Web Page + OPAC = Better Use
Transcript of Web Page + OPAC = Better Use
Denise A. Garofalo
Assistant Librarian, Systems and Catalog Services
Mount Saint Mary College
WEB PAGE + CATALOG = BETTER USE
For ALA Midwinter, PhiladelphiaJanuary 25, 2014
Mount Saint Mary College
� Located on the Hudson River in Newburgh, NY
� 3200 FTE
� Library has 100K items
� 2012-2013 academic year
� 217K webpage views
� 108K OPAC searches
Webpage stuck in the ‘90s
� Structure convoluted, look dated
� Project started in 2011
� Then stalled
� Discovery a possibility
� But $ situation = Discovery service not an option
� Restarted in 2013
� Library move impacted rollout timeline
Considerations for new webpage
� Required� Catalog access on home page
� Requested� Access to other resources from home page
� Easy navigation
� Site search
� Desired� Nice look
� Look like the library is a part of the campus web presence, but distinct
Design
�Clear�Consistent�Communication easy� “direct access to salient features and
information is essential in an effective design strategy3”
3Lynch, P. J., & Horton, S. (2011). Universal usability sidebar: universal design principles.WebStyle Guide, 3rd Ed. Retrieved from http://www.webstyleguide.com/wsg3/2-universal-usability/3-universal-design.html
Navigation
�Clear paths to the content that interests
�Labels are clear & concise
�Prominent site search--usability guidelines tend to prefer the upper-right corner of the page
Content
�Needs to be consistent, organized, and easy to skim through since,� “On the average Web page, users have time to
read at most 28% of the words during an average visit; 20% is more likely.”1
�Critical content above the “fold”
1Nielsen, J. (2008). How little do users read? Nielsen Norman Group, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/
Why the catalog on the library’s web page?
�To support access to our resources� Emphasize what your site does that's
valuable from the user's point of view2
�To increase user satisfaction and remove confusion
�To encourage use
2Nielsen, J. (2001). 113 design guidelines for homepage usability. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/113-design-guidelines-homepage-usability/
Usability….
� “…means that a system has visible working functionality familiar to its users, maximum reliability, and useful content that is supported by its environment and aligned with context of use. In addition, a usable system accommodates the cognitive capacity and various needs of its users, so that they can easily understand, effortlessly learn, and dynamically interact with the system as well as its content, resulting in a satisfactory experience with a high level of productivity.”4
4Chen, Y. H., Germain, C. A., & Rorissa, A. (2011). Defining usability: how library practice differs from published research. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), p621.
Why?
�To provide “more emphasis on user attitude and satisfaction”5
�Wanted to make sure users would be able to use the new library webpage
5 Chen, Y. H., Germain, C. A., & Rorissa, A. (2011). Defining usability: how library practice differs from published research. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), p617.
From http://www.kiddokingdom.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/kiddo-kingdom-fingers-crossed-pray-we-open-this-weekend.jpg
Resources
� Chapman, S., Desai, S., Hagedorn, K., Varnum, K., Mishra, S., & Piacentine, J. (2013). Manually classifying user search queries on an academic library web site. Journal of Web Librarianship, 7(4), 401-421.
� Chen, Y., Germain, C. A., & Yang, H. (2009). An exploration into the practices of library web usability in ARL academic libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 953-968.
� Chen, Y. H., Germain, C. A., & Rorissa, A. (2011). Defining usability: how library practice differs from published research. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 599-628.
� Emde, J. Z., Morris, S. E., & Claasen-Wilson, M. (2009). Testing an academic library website for usability with faculty and graduate students. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 4(4), 24-36.
� Fagan, J. C. (2012). Editorial: Connecting the dots between good Data and good Decisions. Journal of Web Librarianship, 6(2), 87-93.
� Krug, S. (2009). Don't make me think: a common sense approach to web usability. Pearson Education
� Lown, C., Sierra, T., & Boyer, J. (2013). How users search the library from a single search box. College & Research Libraries, 74(3), 227-241.
� Lynch, P. J., & Horton, S. (2011). Web style guide online. Web Style Guide, 3rd Ed. Retrieved from http://www.webstyleguide.com/wsg3/index.html
Resources, cont.� Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing web usability: the practice of simplicity. Indianapolis, IN: New
Riders.
� Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox. Retreivedfrom http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000319.html
� Nielsen, J. (2001). 113 design guidelines for homepage usability. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/113-design-guidelines-homepage-usability
� Nielsen, J. (2008). How little do users read? Nielsen Norman Group,from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/
� Parker, R. C. (1997). Roger C. Parker's Guide to web content and design: eight steps to web site success. New York: MIS:Press.
� Spool, J. M. (1999). Web site usability: a designer's guide. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
� WCAG 2 at a glance. (2011). WCAG 2.0 at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/glance/
� Web site usability testing: recommended procedures. (n.d.). Web site usability testing: recommended procedures. Retrieved from http://www.webpagecontent.com/arc_archive/124/5/