ML17334B615.pdf - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

CATEGORY 1REGULAT INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9703170230 DOC.DATE: 97/03/10 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKETFACIL:.50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315

50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

FITZPATRICK,E. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana 6 Michigan EleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT: Forwards response to RAI re GL 87-02,including responses tonine items from NRC staff ! seismic evaluation work sheets. C

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A025D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:TITLE: Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants — A-46 — GL-87

TNOTES:

RECIPIENTID CODE/NAME

OGC/HDS2HICKMAN,J

COPIESLTTR ENCL

1 11 1

RECIPIENTID CODE/NAME

PD3-3 PD

COPIESLTTR ENCL

1 1

E

0

INTERN : FILE CEDE/ECGB

NRR/DRCH/HHFBNRR/DRPE/PD1-3

EXTERNAL: NRC PDR

1 11 11 11 1

1 1

NRR/DENRR/DE/EMEBNRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXB

1 12 21 11 1

D

U

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK,ROOM OWFN 5D-5(EXT. 415-2083) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROMDISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 13 ENCL 13

Indgana Mich!gan ~Power Company500 CircIe OriveBuchanan, MI 491071395

INOlANSlMlCMGANPQWM

March 10, 1997

Docket Nos.: 50-31550-316

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Document Control DeskWashington, D.C. 20555

Gentlemen:

AEP: NRC: 1040E

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2RESPONSE TO NRC LETTER REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL

INFORMATION RELATED TO COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'S RESPONSETO GENERIC LETTER 87-02 (TAC NO. M69437)

By letter dated October 21, 1996, the NRC requested additionalinformation regarding our January 30, 1996, response to genericletter 87-02. The following attachments contain the requestedinformation.

Attachment No. 1 contains the responses to the nine items fromthe NRC staff

Attachment No. 2

Attachment No. 3

Attachment No. 4

Attachment No. 5

Attachment No. 6

contains the sample seismic evaluation worksheets (SEWS) and anchorage calculations asrequested in item 2

contains the sample SEWS and anchoragecalculations for tanks and heat exchangers asrequested in item 5

contains the seismic adequacy calculations fortanks 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32 as requested in item6

contains the SEWS and anchorage calculationsfor horizontal tanks and heat exchangers asrequested in item 7

contains the calculations for limitedanalytical reviews (LARs) of the cable andconduit raceways as requested in item 8

PP~j~Vice President

vlbAttachments

'P703i70230 9703i0PDR ADOCK 05000315P PDR

r UUrg.g

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME

THIS IO ~ DAY OF

Qdt 199,7

JAMNNSOWNOTARYPUBUC,BERRIEN COUNY, MlMYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES FEB. 10,1999

rrrrrrrrInrrrrrrgmrrI[ItrllrgrrgIrgfr

D~g /

Notary PublicJI

My Commission Expires

IlilIll ll»

lI~

~ p~I II

I

\

JI

'

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionPage 2

AEP: NRC: 1040E

CC A. A. BlindA. B. BeachMDEQ - DW 6c RPDNRC Resident InspectorJ. R. Padgett

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:1040E

RESPONSES TO NRC REQUEST FORADDITIONALINI"ORMATION(RAI)

RELATED TO COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'S RESPONSETO GENERIC LETTER 87-02 (TAC NO M69437)

>)ozgops

" ll

r /

I r. J

l'PaO. i

tf9,"

RESPONSE TO THE USNRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATIONUNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUE USI A-46 REVIEW FOR

DONALDC. COOK NUCLEARPLANT, UNITS 1 &2

%ith rcspcct to Section 2.2, page 2-2, discuss the engineering basis for using the In-Structure Response Spectra (ISRS) developed for the Diesel Generator Building todetermine loads in the AuxiliaryBuilding at Elevation 609 fcct, and provide the DieselGenerator Building and AuxiliaryBuilding ISRS.

The basis for using the ISRS developed for the. diesel generator building to determine loads inthe auxiliary building at elevation 609 feet is provided in the third fullparagraph ofpage 2-2 ofthe final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal. This paragraph states:"The ISRS are not available at some of the floor elevations where safe shutdown equipment is

located. When this is the case, either the ISRS for a higher elevation or the ISRS developed bya linear interpolation between existing ISRS may be used in the evaluation. In the case of theauxiliary building elevation 609 feet, since the interpolated ISRS are very close to the

corresponding ISRS for the diesel generator building, the ISRS for the diesel generatorbuilding were used."

To further illustrate this basis, figure 1 shows a plot of four ISRS (SSE, 5% equipmentdamping) for the elevations in question. These spectra include the auxiliary building 587'nd633'levations which are the elevations where developed spectra exist directly 'above andbelow the 609'levation, and the spectra at 609'n the diesel generator building. In addition tothese spectra, a 609'uxiliary building spectra is provided that was generated by interpolatingthe spectral acceleration values at 587'nd 609'. The auxiliary building and diesel generatorbuilding share a common foundation mat. As shown in figure 1, there is essentially nodifference between the diesel generator spectra at 609'nd the interpolated auxiliary buildingspectra at 609', and, therefore, there is no.engineering significance with regard to the loaddetermination ifeither ofthese are used.

With regard to the diesel generator building and auxiliary building ISRS, the ISRS for allelevations of all buildings at Cook Nuclear Plant included in the USI A-46 evaluation for 2%and 5% equipment damping have been provided in appendix 8 of the final Seismic Evaluationand Walkdown Summary Report submittal.

1.50

Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantComparison of Selected Auxiliary Building FRS and 1.5xBS

to Diesel Generator Building FRS at Elevation 609 feet- 5% Damping

Ql

O

QQOO

C

O

CLG9

1.00

0.50

0.00

0.1 10 50

Frequency (Hz)

Oteeel609'ux 609'nterpohted 1.5xBS

Figure l ISRS for D.G. Building El 609'ompared to ISRS for AuxiliaryBuilding El. 587', 609' 633' 5% Damping

Discuss key examples of designated "rigorously analyzed anchorages," (page 4-6) usinghand calculations and ANCHOR4 sofhvarc package and provide copies of theirengineering calculations. Also discuss a few cases ofanchorage verification based on thcresults of tug tests conducted and provide a description of the tests and applicableengineering justification for such an approach.

Table I provides a list of key examples ofequipment items with varying levels of anchorageevaluations. These examples include "rigorously analyzed anchorages," comparisons toanalyzed equipment items and judgments based on the anchorage inspection and in some

cases judgments supplemented by tug tests. Copies of the completed seismic evaluation worksheets (SEWS), the analysis (ifapplicable) and the corresponding anchorage inspection sheets

are included in attachment 2 of this response to the RAI for those items marked with a * intable l. When comparison or judgment was used to satisfy the GIP anchorage criteria an

appropriate description of the evaluation is documented in the notes of the SEWS. Theanchorage inspections and installation testing performed for the Cook Nuclear Plant USI A-46 evaluations, discussed in greater detail in the response to RAI question 4, greatly exceedthe requirements of the GIP. This provides greater confidence in the judgments made by theseismic review team (SRT) that capacity greatly exceeded demand when a formal anchoragecalculation was not made.

A review of notes within the data base for each equipment item in the Cook Nuclear PlantUSI A-46 effort was conducted in order to respond to this request'for additional information(RAI). Anchorage evaluations performed can be categorized as follows: a) a detailedANCHOR4 evaluation was performed; b) a detailed hand calculation was performed; c) theanchorage was screened based on an anchorage evaluation on an identical item of equipmentand anchorage or a worst case evaluation of a similar equipment item; or d) the SRT judged,based on the weight and anchorage of the equipment, that the anchorage obviously met theGIP screening criteria.

In some cases when method (d) was used, a tug test was performed. This was performed byan SRT member that would tug on the assembly in the weakest direction to a level of abouttwo times the estimated weight of the item. The tug test from a practical standpoint wasunnecessary due to the relative light weight and robust'anchorage of the equipment. Eachanchorage evaluation whether detailed or by judgment was based on a detailed anchorageinspection and the SRT inspection. Items tug tested were in general light weight components.

Samples ofdetailed analysis performed by ANCHOR4 and by hand calculations are includedwith the sample SEWS in attachment 2. When judgment was used the basis for the judgmentis included in the notes section of the SEWS. The detailed anchor inspection documentationis also included with each SEWS provided.

The engineering justification for the approach used for performing the anchorage evaluationsis described in section 4.4, page 4-26 second paragraph of the Rev. 2 GIP. This paragraphstates: "There are various combinations of inspections, analyses, and engineering judgmentwhich can be used to verify the adequacy of equipment anchorage. The Seismic CapabilityEngineers should select the appropriate combination of elements for each anchorage

installation based on the information available. For example, a simple hand calculation maybe sufficient for a pump which has only a few, very rugged, anchor bolts in a symmetricalpattern. On the other hand, at times it may be advisable to use one of the computer codes to

determine the loads applied to a multi-cabinet motor control center if its anchorage is notsymmetrically located." The anchorage evaluations used the appropriate combinations ofelements necessary to determine that any screened equipment met the GIP criteria.

Table 1 provides a brief description of the anchorage evaluation performed. There is a goodcross section of examples that include all equipment classes on the Cook Nuclear Plant safe

shutdown equipment list (SSEL) (1 to 20) and categories ofanchorage evaluations performed.Examples of class 0 and 21 anchorage evaluations are provided in response to RAI questions5 and 7.

Table 1

Examples of Anchorage Evaluations

Class Equipment ID1-AB-N

1-ABD-A*

2-ABV-A

2-AM-D

2-EZC-D

1-11A

1-52-RTB

2-21B

2-T21B

1-T11A

1-CRID-III-CVT

I-TR11B

2-CRID-I-CVT*

Anchorage Evaluation PerformedThree section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Six section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Six section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Eight section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Eleven section MCC (including attached EZC-BS).Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Large Multisection 600V Switchgear. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Reactor Trip Breaker Units composed of 4 breakervertical sections. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Large 'ultisection 600V Switchgear. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Large Multisection 4KV Switchgear... DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Large Multisection 4KV Switchgear. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Small Transformer 4'-6" x 2'-6" x 2'-4". Weightestimated at 1180 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Large supply transformer. Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed.Small Transformer 4'-6" x 2'-6" x 2'-4". Weightestimated at 1180 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.

Table I (Continued)Examples ofAnchorage Evaluations

Class Equipment ID2-TR-ELSC

1-PP-10W*

1-PP-4

1-PP-50W

1-QT-111-AB

12-PP-31S

2-PP-26N

2-PP-3E

2-PP-46-4*

2-PP-82S

2-QT-106-CD1

1-PP-7W

2-PP-9W

1-HV-AFP-8RE-2

Anchorage Evaluation PcrformcdSmall Transformer 20" D x 30" W x 36" H. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed..900 GPM pump. 'etailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed including nozzle loadings on the suction and

discharge piping.440 GPM pump. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed including nozzle loadings on the suction and

discharge piping.Large Pacific Pump with a weight of20,000 lbs. Detailed

, ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Small 90 GPM Pump - weight about 800 lbs. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.100 GPM pump - 2076 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed.. Item was designated an outlieruntil nozzle loads are defined.Pacific Pump - total weight 5500 lbs. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzleloadings on the suction and discharge piping.Large Ingersoll Rand Pump - 7935 lbs. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Small Goulds Pump - 511 lbs. Nozzle loads judged to be

small by SRT. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation (four5l8" anchors) and the walkdown.Small Goulds Pump - 214 lbs. Nozzle loads judged to be

small by. SRT. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation (four5/8" anchors) and the walkdown.Small Worthington Pump - 135 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed induding nozzle loadings on thesuction arid discharge piping.Large vertical pump with a 45'ong vertical casing.Screening of anchorage based on a review of existingqualification that included an anchorage evaluation.Vertical pump. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed'including nozzle loadings on the suction anddischarge piping.Small light weight fan - 154 lbs. Anchorage accepted byjudgment aAer a review of the anchorage drawings.

Table 1 (Continued)'xamplesof Anchorage Evaluations

Class

9

10

10

14

14

14

14

Kquipmcnt ID1-HV-AFP-M1*

1-HV-AFP-Xl

I-HV-CEQ-I

12-HV-ES W-7*

12-HU-ESW-1

2-HU-AFP-BRE-1

2-HV-DGS-1

2-HV-DGX-1

1-HV-ACRA-1

1-HV-AES-1 (FLT)

1-AFW*

1-BCTC-AB

1-CRCD

1-ELSC

1-ELSCX

Anchorage Evaluation PerformedMedium size fan - 500 lbs, mounted with 16 1/2" steelto steel bolts. Anchorage accepted by judgment after a

review of the anchorage drawings.Small light weight fan - 287 lbs, mounted with 12 3/8"steel to steel bolts. Anchorage accepted by judgmentafter a review of the anchorage drawings.Large fan unit. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Large fan unit. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Large fan unit similar to 12-HV-ESW-7. Anchoragescreened based on comparison to ANCHOR4 evaluationfor 12-HV-ESW-7.Small light weight fan - 154 lbs. Anchorage accepted byjudgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.Large fan - 1531 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Large fan - 1100 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Cooler unit with a weight estimate of 3000 lbs. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Large filter unit - 24,000 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed.Small wall mounted panel (36" H x 20" W x 6" D).Panel estimated to weigh 50 lbs. Anchorage screened byjudgment after a review of the anchorage description anda 100 lb. tug test.

Panel 38" W x 60" H x 9" D. Weight estimated at 300lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Rack 38" W x 84" H x 9" D - Weight estimated at 400lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Small wall mounted panel (36" H x 20" W x 6" D).Panel estimated to weight 50 lbs. Anchorage screened

by judgment after a review of the anchorage descriptionand a 100 lb. tug test.

Small distribution panel 57" H x 22" W x 6" D.Weight estimated at 370 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed.

Table 1 (Continued)Examples of Anchorage Evaluations

Class14

14.

14

14

14

14

14

15

16

16

16

16

Equipment ID1-MDAB

1-TDAB

1-VDCD-1 8. 2

2-AFWX

2-BATT-N-SH

2-DCN

2-VDAB-1 &2

2-BATT-AB*

1-BC-AB1

1-CIUD-I-INV

2-BC-A

2-DGAB-INV

1-OME-150-AB*

Anchorage Evaluation PerformedWall mounted switchboard 38" W x 84" H x 9" D.Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4evaluation performed for 1-MCAB.Wall mounted switchboard 38" W x 84" H x 9" D.Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4evaluation performed for 1-MCAB.Pair of 22" W x 38" H x 7" D distribution panels.Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4evaluation performed for 1-VDAB-1 (IdenticalConstruction).Wall mounted panel - 57" H x 22" W x 6" D. Weightestimated at 100 to 150 lbs. Anchorage screened byjudgment after a review of the anchorage description anda tug test.Wall mounted Battery Shunt. Weight estimated at 100lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after a review ofthe anchorage description, the ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed for 1-BATT-N-SH and a tug test.

Switchboard bolted to a steel rack. Anchorage screenedbased on comparison to the ANCHOR4 analysis forsimilar panel 1-DCN.Pair of 22" W x 38" H x 7" D distribution panels.Anchorage screened based on comparison to the detailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed for similar panel 1-

VDAB-1.Substantial 2 - step battery rack. Anchorage evaluationbased on a review of existing anchorage and recentmodifications made to the racks.

Battery Charger 3025 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed.Inverter 2'-5" x 3' 6'-3" - 2100 lbs. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Battery Charger 32" L x 24" W x 46" H. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Inverter 28" x 28" x 57". Detailed ANCHOR4evaluation performed.Large Diesel Generator. Anchorage capacity for 2-OME-150-CD indicated an additional margin of 36.Anchorage screened based on comparison to thatevaluation.

Table 1 (Continued)Examples of Anchorage Evaluations

Class18

18

1&

18

18

1&

18

18

18

18

18

Equipment ID1-CLI-113

1-CPS-317

1-CPS-410

1-MPP-232

1-NPP-151

2-8LI-110

2-CLI-113

2-CPS-410

2-FFI-210

2-IFI-311

2-IFI-51

Anchorage Evaluation PerformedSmall transmitter - 27 lbs. Anchorage screened byjudgment after review of the anchorage inspectiondocumentation and the walkdown.Small 9" x 9" panel. Anchorage screened by judgmentafter review of the anchorage inspection documentationand the walkdown.Rack supported device. One detailed ANCHOR4analysis was performed to encompass 1-CPS-410, 8c

420 and 2-CPS-410 Ec, 420.Small pressure transmitter - 35 lbs. Anchorage screened

by judgment after review of the anchorage inspectiondocumentation and the walkdown.Small pressure transmitter - 24 lbs. including bracket.Anchorage screened by judgment aAer review of theanchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.Instrument on small, stiff bracket. Assembly weighsless than 100 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation and,the walkdown.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a smalldiameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation andthe walkdown.Small device on a rack. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a smalldiameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation andthe walkdown.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a smalldiameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation andthe walkdown.Transmitter bolted to support composed of a smalldiameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment afterreview of the anchorage inspection documentation andthe walkdown.

Table 1 (Continued)Examples ofAnchorage Evaluations

Class

18

19

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

Equipmcnt ID2-XRY-153

1-VTS-356

2-Al 1*

1-ACRA-2

1-CAS

1-DGAB

1-GR-1

1-HSD1

1-NRI-23-ISO

2-CG2

2-PRZ

2-RPS-A

2-SWRR

Anchorage Evaluation PerformedSmall rack consisting of a small panel bolted to P1000unistruts. Anchorage screened by judgment after reviewof the anchorage inspection documentation and thewalkdown.Light weight component - 5 lbs. Anchorage screened byjudgment after review of the anchorage inspectiondocumentation, the walkdown and a tug test.

Relay panel included in a section of panel from A6 toA15. Weight estimate ofentire panel 3000 lbs. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Stand alone panel 24" L x 24" D x 84" H. Weightestimated @ 700 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Large Control Panel 24'-6" L x 6'-3" D x 7'. Handcalculation performed on the weak link in the anchoragesystem and found to be more than adequate.

Large Control Panel in Diesel Generator Room. DetailedANCHOR4'evaluation performed.Relay Rack 6'-6" L x 8'. Weight estimated 300lbs./lineal foot of rack. Hand calculation performed onthe weak link in the anchorage system and found to bemore than adequate.

Walkthrough cabinet 12' x 6' x 8'. DetailedANCHOR4 evaluation performed.Heavy duty rack. Anchorage judged adequate based onreview of the anchorage inspection documentation, thewalkdown and the obvious ruggedness and installationof this new design.Control cabinet 5'-6" L x 2'-6" W x 7'-7" H.Anchorage screened based on comparison to theANCHOR4 evaluation performed for similar panel 1-

RPC-1.Item is included in a Control Panel with two other items.Total panel is 12'-3" L x 8'. Weight estimated at300 Ibs/lineal ft. Anchorage screened based oncomparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for1-SG,

Relay cabinet 90" W x 30" D x 90" H, welded toembedded steel. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluationperformed.Cabinet 16' x 8' x 18" D. Weight estimated at 300lbs/lineal ft. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.

3) Table 4.5 shows that the 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum and the, GERS with an amplificationfactor of 7 do not cnvclopc thc floor response spectra. Provide copies of thc seismicdemand versus capacity spectral comparison.

The location of the devices that are documented as outliers in table 4.5 are at elevation 687'nthe containment building. Figure 2 shows a comparison of the ISRS at elevation 687'n thecontainment building to 1.5 times the bounding spectrum. The GERS must be compared to1.5 times the demand spectra for median centered spectra because Cook Nuclear Plantresponse spectra was designated as median centered spectra by the NRC. An amplificationfactor through the piping and support of the piping system must also be considered whencomparing GERS to the demand spectra. The GIP defines the upper bound amplificationfactor as 7. Therefore, the total ISRS was multiplied by 1.5 x 7 (10.5) to define the demandthat is compared to the GERS. Figure 3 shows a comparison of the GERS for air operatedvalves (AOVs) to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'. Figure 4 shows acomparison of the GERS for solenoid operated valves (SOUs) to 10.5 x the ISRS atcontainment building elevation 687'. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the GERS for motoroperators to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'. As shown in figures 2,3, 4, and 5, the demand exceeds the capacity.

The outlier resolution for these items is to review the existing piping analyses and comparethe demand acceleration from the analysis to the capacity acceleration. It is believed that theactual amplification factor is less than 7 and the capacity willbe shown to be greater than thedemand once the outlier resolution has been completed.

10

2,00

Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantCont. Bldg. Elev. 687.5 feet vs 1.5xBS

5% Damping

1,50C0GJS

Q)

u 1,000

0

0.50

P

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~

~ ~ I r

: ~ ~ i ~ .: ~: ~ X I ~ ~

I I ~ I ~ 'I

~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ \~ r,, ~ J' ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ I

0 ~ 000.1 10

Frequency (Hz)

1.5xBS EL667.5

Figure 2 ISRS for Containment El. 6".7.5'. Vs. 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum - 5% Damping

11

20

Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantAmplified Containment Building El. 687.5 feet vs AOV GERS

5o/o Damping

15C06$l0)

10

(5

DSa. 5(0

'I r ~ r r ~ ~

' ~ h ~

~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ r/:.'/'.

: r~..~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -:.r ~ ~ ~ -'.. ~ ~ ': ~ ~: ~ ': ~:.

~ ~ r

0

0.1

~ \4 ~

10

Frequency (Hz)

1 O.Gx

EL687AOVGERS

Figure 3 Amplified ISRS for Containment El. 687.5's. AOVGERS -5% Damping

Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantAmplified Containment Building El. 687.5 feet vs Solenoid Valve GERS

- 5/o Damping20

~ r

I I I I

1 h ~

\ I

15O

CIu 10O

CS

0Q)a. 5

CO

~ \ h ~

I' I' I

~ r e ~

I ~

I \ ~ h h I

~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ h

j I ~ I' ~ P

0 ~ h ~ ~

'I ~ ~

/~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

/~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~

0.1 10 50

. Frequency (Hz)

1 0.5xEL687

SolenoidGERS

F<igure 4 Amplified ISRS for Containment El. 687.5's. Solenoid Valve GERS - 5% Damping

13

25

Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantAmplified Containment Building El. 687.5 feet vs MOV GERS

5% Damping~ ~ 'r ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ '

~ r

20

C0C6

OO

10

0CL(0 -5

~ 4 % ~

~ e ~ e e ~

~ ~

' r ~ o' ~

r ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t I. r ~ ~ ~

~ ~;:.I-. I...... '

~ 0 ~ ~ ~

~ ~ J' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I

'I. ~ s... ~ .s.) ~ ~ .... ~

~:- ~ ~ ~ -': I ~:. ~-

~ ~ ./ ~

t r ~ ~ ~ 5

0

0.1

~ 5 0 0 4 1 ~ 8 ~ I

10 50

Frequency (Hz)

3 0.5x MOVEL687 GERS

Figure 5 Amplified ISRS for Containment El. 687.5's. Motor Operator GERS - 5% Damping

l4

Regarding thc tightncss check of expansion anchors performed on a representative number ofmechanical and electrical components, state whether the representative number meets thcsample size for expansion anchor tightness check as listed on table C.2-4 of the GIP.

The number ofexpansion bolts tightness tested for the Cook Nuclear Plant VSI A-46 effort exceeded

the sample size for expansion anchor tightness check as listed on table C.2-4 of the GIP. Bolttightness checks were conducted on every accessible expansion bolt in the scope of USI A-46equipment on the SSEL. In addition all accessible steel to steel and cast-in-place bolts/nuts werevisually inspected and loose nuts were tightened as needed. This was done to ensure that the boltswere snug and therefore active in the event of vertical reaction loadings on the anchorage during anearthquake. Other tests using ultrasonic techniques to determine embedment length and weld qualitywere also performed as an enhancement to the program. Anchorage inspection documentation isincluded with the SEWS in attachment 2 of this RAI.

When the type of expansion anchor used could not be positively determined, a 0.6 reduction factorfor unknown expansion bolts was used in the anchorage evaluations performed in accordance withthe GIP.

Inaccessible anchor bolts were not tightness tested. The GIP excludes inaccessible anchors from thesample and states in the second paragraph of section 4 4.1 that "all accessible anchorages should bevisually inspected. Allpracticable'means should be tried to inspect inaccessible anchorages or thoseobstructed from view ifthey are needed for strength to secure the item ofequipment or ifthey secure

'quipmenthousing essential relays (to avoid impact or excessive cabinet motion). For exam'pie, it isnot considered practicable to resort to equipment disassembly, removal, etc., to inspect inaccessibleanchorages. The basis for the engineering judgment for not performing these inspections should bedocumented." The majority of anchorages for SSEL equipment were accessible. These anchorageswere tightness tested, had their embedment length verified and were visually inspected by theanchorage inspection team and were again visually inspected by the SRT.

There were some fans that had inaccessible anchorages that would have required removal of fireprotection material to inspect and disposal of material that could possibly be contaminated. Thiswould not have been consistent with the ALARAgoals at the site (dust and exposure). These fanshad calculated or judgmental anchorage margins of 10 or greater and therefore were not inspected.Anchorages for these were primarily cast in place or steel to steel bolts and the tightness check wasnot required to be performed. The regenerative heat exchanger anchorages were also not visuallyinspected due to the time required to remove insulation and to perform the anchorage inspection in a

high radiation area. There werc also a number ofwall mounted panels (class 14 and 20) that were nottightness checked. Tightness checking of these bolts would have required complete equipmentdisassembly and removal of the equipment. This activity would be contrary to section 4.4.1 of theGIP. These panels also had very high margins even when considering a 0.6 reduction factor forunknown expansion anchors. In the cases mentioned above, the engineering judgment for notperforming the inspections were documented on the SEWS for the equipment item. There were alsosome cases when isolated bolts were not tested on a given assembly because they could not be

reached without disassembly. These cases are documented in the anchorage inspectiondocumentation.

5) Table 5.1 shows only four (4) vertical tanks for GIP review. Provide the engineering criteriafor sclccting only four vertical tanks and thc justification of the structural integrity of the othersmaller vertical tanks for Safe Shutdown E<arthquakc (SSK). Indicate the number of verticaltanks supported on skirts and structural legs at Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 8r, 2.

Table 5.1 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal includes onlythe flat bottom vertical tanks that may be evaluated using the GIP methodology in section 7 of the

GIP. These tanks are described in the first paragraph of section 7.3.1 of the GIP which states: "Thetype of vertical tanks covered by the screening guidelines are large, cylindrical tanks whose axis ofsymmetry is vertical and are supported, on their flat bottoms, directly on a concrete pad or a floor."

The evaluation of the remaining tanks are documented in table 4-7 of the final Seismic Evaluationand Walkdown Summary Report submittal. Items 1 and 2 of table 4-7 "Commentary on EquipmentItems Meeting the Intent of the GIP Caveats" discuss this evaluation. Item 1 includes class 0

equipment items and states "There are 50 and 51 equipment items identified as class 0 in unit 1 andunit 2 respectively. These items were primarily passive and were similar to items considered as

components of the class 21 equipment. For these equipment items the SRT assessed the potential forseismic damage and made the necessary evaluations. All these items were at locations in the plantwhere 1.5 times the bounding spectrum is greater than the floor response spectra where they arelocated. Anchorage was evaluated using the GIP criteria." Item 2 includes class 21 tanks and heatexchangers not covered by the GIP criteria (section 7 of the GIP). This item states:. "There are 63

and 58 equipment items identified as class 21 in unit 1 and unit 2 respectively. Of these tanks andheat exchangers, there were only 20 where the GIP criteria was applicable. The remaining 98 wereevaluated by meeting the intent of the GIP criteria. Anchorage was evaluated using the GIP criteria."

The class 0 and 21 equipment items on the SSEL that may be categorized as tanks and heat

exchangers for unit 1 and 2 are listed in tables 2 &, 3, respectively. The table includes a description ofthe tank or heat exchangers configuration and anchorage evaluation. Included in that list are all tankssupported on skirts and structural legs that are on the Cook Nuclear Plant SSEL. Tanks on legsinclude 1,2-QT-113-AB1, AB2, CD1, CD2 (eight diesel oil filters); 1,2-QT-144-AB, CD (four dieseloil filters}; 1,2-TK-10 (two reactor coolant letdown volume control tanks); 1,2-TK-11 (two boroninjection tanks); 1-TK-12-N, 12-TK-12-M and 2-TK-12S (three boric acid storage tanks}. Tanks onskirts include 1,2-TK-37 (two component cooling water surge tanks); and 1,2-QT-141, AB1, AB2,CD1, CD2 (eight diesel starting air receivers).

Sample SEWS (including the calculations and anchorage inspection documentation) are provided inattachment 3 for the tanks that have an * aAer the equipment ID in tables 2 and 3.

Table 2Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)

Class IDI-QT-112-AB &,

CD (2 filters)

DescriptionAB &CD EMERGDIESEL FULLFLOW LUBE OILFILTERS

Building El.AUXILIARY 579

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationSmall tank-like component containing oil, with a height ofabout 5', and a

diameter of3'. Weight full= 2707 lbs. Anchored by three 3/8" diameter J-

bolts and three 5/8" wedge anchors at 60 degree intervals (i.e., evenlyspaced).

I-QT-I 13-AB I *,113-AB2, 113-

CD I, 113-CD2

(4 strainers)

I-QT-116-AB &CD (2 heatertanks)

I-QT-118-AB &CD (2 filters)

AB &, CD EMERGDIESEL FULLFLOW LUBE OILSTRAINERS

AB &, CD EMERGDIESEL LUBE OILHEATER(TANK)

AB EMERG DIESELBYPASS LUBE OILFILTER

AUXILIARY 579

AUXILIARY 579

AUXILIARY 579

The anchorage was screened based on a review ofan existing vendorcalculation that indicated a high anchorage margin.Strainer supported on 4 angle legs. Each leg is anchored by one 1/2" J-boltanchor. The total weight is 1730 lbs. The ANCHOR4 analysis performedfor 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2 together, since they are connected

by a relatively rigid piping segment, indicated that the anchorage was

adequate..Heaters anchored by three 3/8" J-bolts at 120 degrees apart, on a 5" highconcrete pad. The weight of the tank is approximately 152.5 lbs.

Anchorage screened by an ANCHOR4 evaluation.Filter anchored by three 3/8" J-bolts with a minimum embedment of10.25", at 120 degrees.

The approximate weight of the tank is estimated to be the same as 1-QT-112-CD (Wt =2707 lbs.), because the tanks are of the same manufacturer,and size, and both hold oil.

Anchorage screened by an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

Table 2 (Continued)Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)

Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationI-QT-143-ABI, AB EMERGAB2, CD I & DIESEL CONTROLCD2 (4 dryers) AIR DRYER I

AUXILIARY Airdryer mounted on 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 1/4" angle steel frame with otherair dryer tanks. Angle frame on 1-3/4" Grout Pad. Frame anchored byeight 1/2" non-shell type expansion anchors, four per base plate. Tankshold air and are the size of fire extinguishers.

I-QT-144-AB AB EMERG&CD (2 filters) DIESEL FUEL OIL

TRANSFERFILTERS

AUXILIARY 58

7

Anchorage judged adequate based on the walkdown and review of the

anchorage inspection documentation.Small filter 10" in diameter, 44" high, mounted on three angle legsanchored by three 5/8" Phillips Red Head Wedge/coupling anchors

Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation for 1-QT-144-AB.

I -TK-253-1, 2,3 &4 (4 tanks)

PRESSURIZER TR"B" PRESSURERELIEF VALVENRV-152 RESERVECONTROL AIRTANKS

CONTAINMENT 61

2This horizontal tank contains air and is supported by other than standardsaddles:

Tank is well welded to building steel, and judged adequate by the SRT.

12-TK-207 REACTOR PLANTNITROGEN BULKSTORAGE TANKS¹3,4,5,6,7,8

GROUNDS 609

Similar to a horizontal heat exchanger; each tank is approximately 2'ndiameter and 20'ong (about 15'etween supports). Tank weight is about4800 lbs. Anchorage consists of four cast-in-place (in buried concrete

pedestals) 3/4" diameter J-Bolts.

Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

18


Class21

21

IDI-HE-11

I-HE-13*

DescriptionREACTORCOOLANTPUMPSEAL WATERHEATEXCHANGEREXCESS LETDOWN HEATEXCHANGER

BuildingAUXILIARY

CONTAINMENT

El.609

612

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationVertical Heat Exchanger is identical to 2-HE-11. The anchorage wasscreened by comparison to the calculation for 2-HE-11.

Relatively small exchanger (1600 lbs) on two saddles in extremely high radarea.

Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet intopiers. Could not inspect the anchorage due to ALARAconsiderations.

21 I-HE-14 LETDOWN HEATEXCHANGER

AUXILIARY 633

Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts) and small exchanger, the anchoragewas judged adequate by the SRT.Exchanger anchored with two 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing.Vertical distance from the base ofexchanger to the C.G. of exchanger is 13".

Vertical distance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29".

Anchorage adequacy was accepted based on a short hand calculation..21 I-HE-15E 8c EAST AND WEST

W (2 CCW HEATexchangers) EXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 609 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles.

Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts. There are four 1" wedge expansionanchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.

C.G. ofexchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.

A hand calculation was performed for the heat exchanger and the resultsshow that the anchor bolts and saddles are adequate.

19


Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21

21

I-HE-I7E & W (2exchangers)

I-HE-18E' W (2exchangers)

EAST & WESTRHR HEATEXCH ANGERS

EAST & WESTCONTAINMENTSPRAY HEATEXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 6P9

AUXILIARY 6P9

Anchorage more than adequate based on previous analysis of exchangerwithout top braces. Braces had since been installed.

Very well engineered support structure.

There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the mall ineach ofthe four quadrants. This takes the overturning loads on the

exchanger.

Bottom support (at about the 1/4 point of the exchanger, with theremainder of the exchanger hanging below) is a heavy duty ring withgussets at the bolt locations. These are bolted to a steel support structurethat is obviously well engineered.

21 I-HE-32E &32W(2 exchangers)

EAST RHR PUMPPP-35EMECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 573

Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis. Based on the

review of this analysis and anchorage inspection documentation the Heat

Exchanger is adequate.8" diameter by 2" wide exchanger, attached to East Residual HeatRemoval Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have been considered withthe pump'using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listedseparately on the SSEL.

Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.

20

Table 2 (Continued)Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)

Class21

IDI-HE-33E & W(2exchangers)

DescriptionEAST AND WESTCONTAINMENTSPRAY PUMP PP-9EMECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGER

Building El.AUXILIARY 573

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to East Containment

Spray Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pumpusing the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separatelyon the SSEL.


21 I-HE-34-NE*, 34-

NW, 34-SE, &34-SW (4 exchangers)

NORTH SAFETYINJECTION PUMPPP-26N INBOARD *

MECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 587 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety InjectionPump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pump usingthe rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the

SSEL.


21 I-HE-35N, 35S (2coolers)

NORTH SAFETYINJECTION PUMPPP-26N LUBE OILCOOLERS

AUXILIARY 587 Small exchangers 1'-5" long and 4" in diameter attached to North SafetyInjection Pump with four 1/4" bolts. Could have screened with the

pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listedseparately on the SSEL.


21


Class ID Description Building El. Description ofConfiguration and Anchorage Evaluation21 I-HE-36-EN, 36-ES,

36-WN, 36-WS(4 exchangers)

EAST & WESTCENTRIFUGALCHARGING PUMP PP-50EINBOARDMECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 587 6" in diameter 8-3/4" high heat exchanger, attached to East

Centrifugal Charging Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could havescreened with the pump using the rule of the box, however theexchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.

Anchorage to the-pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.

21 I-HE-37E, 37W (2coolers)

EAST&, WESTCENTRIFUGALCHARGING PUMP PP-

50E, &50WGEAROILCOOLERS

AUXILIARY 537 Small exchanger 1'-6" long and 5" in diameter attached toreinforced plate support with four 1/2" bolts. Plate support boltedto East Centrifugal Charging Pump with three 1/2" bolts. Couldhave screened with the pump using the rule of the box, howeverthe exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.

21 I-HE-38E &38W (2coolers)

EAST & WESTCENTRIFUGALCHARGING PUMPBEARING LUBE OILCOOLERS

AUXILIARY 5g7Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.Small exchangers 1'-6" long and 5" in diameter bolted to two

1'ong

channel columns that are welded to the skid of the EastCentrifugal Charging Pump. Could have screened with the pumpusing the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listedseparately on the SSEL.


22


Class

21

ID- I-HE-47-ABN&47-ABS, 47-CDN &47-CDS (4 aItercoolers)

I-QP-21

DescriptionAB &CD EMERGDIESEL NORTHCOMBUSTIONAIRAFTERCOOLERS

NORTH BORICACID BLENDER(MIXINGTEE)

BuildingAUXILIARY

AUXILIARY

El.587

587

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationAftercooler on Diesel Generator skid transfers its lateral load to theinlet manifolds. Gravity loads are carried by a post on a spring hangerbase, so the post is incapable ofcarrying lateral or longitudinal load.

The Diesel Generator Turbochargers in Unit 1 were replaced in a recent

outage. As part of the modification, an analysis was perforined for theassociated piping and the aftercoolers. Allsupports met D.C. Cookacceptance criteria.Boric Acid Blender supported by piping. It is in-line with the pipebetween two pipe supports offthe floor. Blender very small (6" indiameter and 11" long).

21 I-QT-107- AB &CD(2 tanks)

CD EMERGDIESEL FUEL OILDAYTANKS

AUXILIARY 587

Screened based on drawings (insulation precluded inspection of the

blender connection to the piping system) and inspection for interactions.

Horizontal tanks which sits on two saddles. Each saddle has two, 1/4"

thick plates, forming a "U", with no gussets. There are two 5/8" anchors

per saddle.

21 I-QT-110-AB &CD(2 Coolers)

AB &CD EMERGDIESEL LUBE OILCOOLERS

AUXILIARY 587

A Horizontal Tank Analysis was performed to show that the tankanchorage is adequate.

Lube Oil Coolers mounted to wall with fourteen 3/4" wedge typeexpansion anchors.

External Anchor Analysis was performed on the Unit 2 Jacket WaterHeater 2-QT-131-CD which has the same configuration as 1-QT-110-AB. Based on this. analysis, both supports are adequate.

23


Class21

IDI-QT-131-AB &,

CD (2 Coolers)

DescriptionAB 64 CD EMERGDIESEL JACKETWATERCOOLERS

BuildingAUXILIARY

El.587

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationJacket Water Cooler mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" wedge typeexpansion anchors. External Anchor Analysis was performed on the Unit2 Jacket Water Heater 2-QT-131-CD..

Based on this analysis both supports are adequate.

I-QT-133-AB &CD (2 Tanks)

AB 8c CD EMERGDIESEL JACKETWATER SURGETANKS

AUXILIARY 587 100 Gal. Tanks, 2'-6" D x 3'.

Notes and the ANCHOR4 analysis for 1-QT-133-CD also apply to 1-QT-133-AB since they are essentially identical.

The surge tanks are supported (bolted) to a shelf. The shelf is bolted to

the wall by four J-bolts. In addition, two 3/4" wedge anchors attach the

top channel to the wall. The wedge anchors were conservatively left outof the ANCHOR4 analysis.

21 I-QT-134-AB &134-CD (2 Tanks)

AB &CD EMERGDIESEL AUXJACKET WATERHEATERS(TANKS}

AUXILIARY 587

The anchorage was screened based on an ANCHOR4 analysis for the

anchorage to the shelf.The AB tank is the same as the CD tank except that 3/8" bolts weremeasured in the field instead of the 1/4" bolts on the drawings for AB.

The ANCHOR4 analysis for 1-QT-134-CD (using 1/4" diameter PhillipsRedhead Wedge Anchors) demonstrated adequacy. The base plates werealso shown to be adequate.

24

Table 2 (Continued)Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)

Class ID Description Building'l. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21

21

21

I -QT-141-AB I,141-AB2, 141-CD I,141-CD2 (4 airreceivers)

I-TK-10

I-TK-11*

AB &CD EMERGDIESEL STARTINGAIR RECEIVERS I

&2

REACTORCOOLANTLETDOWNVOLUMECONTROL TANK

BORON INJECTIONTANK

AUXILIARY

AUXILIARY

AUXILIARY

5S7 Airtanks anchored by four 5/S" J-bolts (Ref. 1, 4). Total weight foreach tank is 6000 lb.

Tank anchorage was verified by an ANCHOR4 analysis. Nozzle loadswere included.

609 Tank on 4 wide flange legs, 90 inches in diameter and 120 inches inheight.

Tank 1-TK-10 is similar to the 2-TK-10. Tank anchorage and wide.flange legs were evaluated in a hand calculation for 2-TK-10 and foundto be adequate.

612 Tank is 5'iameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Legsupports (10" WF w/5/S" flange) 4'-4" in height..

.Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/ two embedded 1 3/4" bolts.

21 I-TK-200 MAINSTEAMLEADSCONDENSATIONDRAINTANK(POT)

The Seismic Evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) isseismically adequate. The Boron Injection Tank (1-TK-11) is muchsmaller but has about the same support. Therefore, Tank 1-TK-11 isjudged adequate based on comparison.

621 Small tank supported from floor.

Anchorage judged acceptable based on the walkdown and theanchorage inspection documentation.

25


Class

21

IDI-TK-32

DescriptionCONDENSATESTORAGE TANK

Building El.GROUNDS 609

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationLarge flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height (31'-7"

liquid tank). 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs. Anchored withthirty 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'-4" long strap that is embedded in the concreteat a 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.

The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 RefuelingWater Storage Tanks (RWST) 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33. The calculation forthe RWST resulted in the conclusion that the meld to the tank and

embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the fullyieldstrength of the strap.

The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST. The calculationfor the RWST using the GIP methodology indicated an overall safetyfactor of2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.

21 I-TK-33 REFUELINGWATERSTORAGE TANK

G ROUN DS 609

The CST was screened based on a comparison of the significant attributesto the RWST.Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'iquidtank). 420,000 gallons, weight 94,000 lbs. The tank is founded on a

concrete pad and anchored with twenty-five 3/8" th x 5" W x 4' 4" Lstrap, embedded in concrete a 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.

A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG GIP criteria. Thecalculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and

embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yieldstrength of the strap. The calculation for the RWST using GIPmethodology indicated an overall safety factor of2.57 for overturningand 1.72 for shear.

26

Table.2 (Continued)Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)

Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21 I-TK-37* COMPONENT

COOLINGNATER SURGETANK

AUXILIARY 650 Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height. Skirt is 4'-6" high from the topof the pad to skirt connection to tank. Skirt has I/2" thickness. There are 8 boltsevenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2"

width. Bolts suppoited from 3" x 3 x I/2" angle.

21

21

I -TK-76N, 76S

I-TK12-N

CONTROLROOM A/CNORTH ANDSOUTH CHILLV/ATEREXPANSIONTANKSNORTH BORICACIDSTORAGETANK

AUXILIARY 650

AUXILIARY 537

The anchorage was screened based on a hand calculation performed for the boltstresses.

Small tank 2'n length x 9" in diameter on a I" diameter piping system. Tank in-linewith pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantilevered angle (2 I/2" x 2 I/2" x 3/8")about I'6" long. Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to the wall with 2 I/2"expansion anchors.

Anchorage and support for these small tanks were accepted by SRT judgment after the

walkdown and a review of the anchora e ins ection documentation.

Boric Acid Tank on 4 Wide Flange Beam Legs.

This Tank is identical to tank 2-TK-12S which was evaluated-by means

ofa calculation. The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorageare adequate.

21 I 2-HE- I 6N NORTH SPENTFUEL PIT HEATEXCHANGER

AUXILIARY 609 3' 2" diameter horizontal heat exchanger about 22'ong on two saddles supported bypiers, Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs. Exchanger bolted into pier with four7/8" diameter bolts per saddle. Piers are doweled into floor. The results of tankanal sis show that the tank anchora e and saddles are ade uate.

Table 2 (Continued)Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Kxchangers (Unit 1)

Class

21

ID12-OME-44N-2 &44S-2

Descri tionNORTH &SOUTHRADIOACTIVEWASTE GASCOMPRESSOROME-44N-2 SEALWATER HEATEXCHANGERS

EI.BuildinAUXILIARY 609

Descri tion of Confi uration and Anchora e EvaluationSmall Heat Exchanger 3'-2" long by 10" in diameter attached to South

Radioactive Waste Gas Compressor OME-44S-1 with 4 - 1/2" bolts.

Compressor anchored to ground with 4 3/4" bolts. The SRT reviewedthe anchorage drawings for the compressor and judged the anchorageto be adequate (4 J-bolts). The compressor is not on the SSEL and

only anchorage adequacy is required.

21 12-TK-47-AB*&47-CD

AB &CD EMERGDIESEL FUEL OILSTORAGE TANKS

GROUNDS

The anchorage of the compressor was judged acceptable after a reviewof the anchorage during the walkdown.

609 Underground tanks. SRT evaluated this tank based on the availabledocumentation in the equipment package.

A tank calculation was performed by hand. The tank was modeled as a

beam on elastic foundation. The overall tank stresses were very low (onthe order of3.6 ksi).

21 12-TK12-M MIDDLEBORICACID STORAGETANK

AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Tank on 4 Wide Flange Beam Legs. Alldimensions for the

tank, legs, connections and anchorage given in the anchorage packagefor the tank.

This Tank is identical to tank 2-TK-12S which was evaluated by means

ofa hand calculation. The calculation indicated that the legs and

anchorage are adequate. This tank was screened based on comparisonto the Unit 2 calculation.

28

Table 3Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat E<xchangers (Unit 2)

Class ID12-HE-25A

Description15GPMRADIOACTIVEWASTEEVAPORATORHE-25CONDENSER

BuildingAUXILIARY

El.600

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationComponent is supported offshell ofmuch larger (about 4.0') diametertank 12-TK-148 which is not on the SSEL. This component is

designated an outlier due to concerns related to the anchorage for 12-TK-148 and nozzle loads.

12-HE-25B & C (2Coolers)

2-QT-112-AB &CD (2 filters)

15 GPMRADIOACTIVEWASTEEVAPORATORHE-25DISTILLATECOOLERS

AB&CDEMERGENCYDIESEL FULLFLOW LUBE OILFILTER

AUXILIARY

AUXILIARY

587

579

The Heat Exchanger is about 14" in diameter and 10 feet long,supported by stiffened saddles with two 3/4" diameter anchor bolts ineach saddle, supported offofa steel platform. Weight ofHX < 2000 lbs.

Capacity exceeds demand for saddles, support frame and platform byinspection.Small tank, with a ht ofabout 5'nd a diameter of3', anchored by six1/2" expansion anchors at 60 degree intervals. Tank contains oil, totalmaximum approximate weight = 2707 lbs.

ANCHOR analysis shows high margins and includes inlet and outletnozzle loads.

29

Table 3 (Continued)Description ofAnchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)

Class Descri tion Buildin El. Descri tion of Confi uration and Anchora e Evaluation2-QT-113-ABI,AB2,CDI &CD2 (4Strainers)

AB EMERGENCYDIESEL FULLFLOW LUBE OILSTRAINER 5 I

AUXILIARY 579 Supported on four angle legs. Each leg is anchored by one I/2" J-bolt anchor.

Weight = 17304, c.g. at approx. mid-height = 33".

The ANCHOR analysis performed for CDI & CD2 including nozzle loads showed

a high margin. The inlet and outlet nozzle loads were assumed equally distributedbetween the two strainers. Anchorage for ABI and AB2 was acceptable bycorn arison.

2-QT-116-AB&CD

AB&CDEMERGENCYDIESEL LUBE OILHEATER TANK

AUXILIARY 579 Small heater 9.5" Dia. x 3'-9.5" Ht.

Anchorage screened based on the ANCHOR4 analysis for 116-CD.II

2-QT-118-A B&CD

AB EMERGENCYDIESEL BYPASSLUBE OIL FILTER

AUXILIARY 579 Filter anchored by nine anchors in three groups of three, so each group is 120 degrees

for the next (i.e., evenly space).

The approx. syeight of the tank is estimated to be the same as that of2-QT-I l2-CD(Wt =2707//), because the tanks are of the same manufacturer, size, and both hold oil.

2-QT-143-ABI,AB2 andCD I, CD2 (4dryers)

AB EMERGENCYDIESELCONTROL AIRDRYER/II

AUXILIARY 587

Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation.

Small tank mounted together on steel frame with the other air dryer tank (ABI withAB2 and CDI with CD2). Frame anchored by eight 3/8" non-shell type expansionanchors, four per base plate. Tanks hold air and are the size of fire extinguishers,

(approx. 8.9 lbs. filled weight each). The nozzle loads are not a concern.

Anchorage screened based on judgment aAer walkdown and review ofanchorageinspection documentation.

30


Class ID2-QT-l44-AB &CD (2 filters)

DescriptionAB&CDEMERGENCYDIESEL FUEL OILTRANSFER FILTER

BuildingAUXILIARY

El.587

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationSmall filteron three angle legs anchored by three 5/8" Phillips Red Head Wedgeanchors. No interactions.

Anchorage screened by judgment after walkdown and review ofanchorage inspectiondocumentation.

0 2-TK-253-1 &2

0 2-TK-253-3 &4

PRESSURIZERTRAIN

'A'RESSURE RELIEFVLVNRV-153RESERVECONTROL AIRBOTTLE RACKPRESSURIZERTRAIN

'B'RESSURE RELIEFVLVNRV-152EMERGENCY AIRBOTTLE RACK

CONTAINMENT 612

CONTAINMENT 650

This component is a small (about 4.5'ong x 16" diameter) air tank horizontallymounted (welded) on a short length of I beam which in turn is welded to buildingsteel. Tank weight was assumed to be 250 lbs.

An ANCHOR4 analysis showed a very high margin.

This component is a cylindrical compressed air "bottle" about 12" in diameter and60" tall, secured to the crane wall with steel straps that are attached to a very stoutsteel bracket arrangement, secured to the wall with a number ofexpansion anchors.

AEPSC Structural &Analytical Design Nuclear Section reviewed the as-foundcondition of the support for this tank, and found it to be adequate for design loads.

21 12-HE-16S SOUTH SPENTFUEL PIT HEATEXCHANGER

AUXILIARY 609 Horizontal heat exchanger 3' 2" diameter, and about 22'ong on two saddles

supported by piers. Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs.

Exchanger bolted into pier with four 718" diameter bolts per saddle. Piers are

doweled into floor. The tank anchorage and saddles were adequate based on the

analysis for 12-HE-16N as noted in Table 2.


Class

21

ID2-HE-I I »

DescriptionREACTORCOOLANTPUMPSEAL WATERHEATEXCHANGER

BuildingAUXILIARY

El.

609Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation

Vertical Heat Exchanger on a Gusseted steel pedestal. Each Pedestal

is anchored to the floor with eight 3/4" J-Bolts embedded 20" intofloor. Exchanger is 16" in diameter and 14'n height.

Exchanger is bolted to the steel pedestal with two 1" diameter steel

bolts on 6" centers in weak direction and 2'-8" in strong direction.This connection is more limiting than the anchorage to the floor.

21 2-HE-13 EXCESS LETDOWN CONTAINMENT 612HEATEXCHANGER

A hand calculation was performed to demonstrate the adequacy ofthese four bolts.Heat exchanger (1600 Ibs) on two saddles in extremely high rad area.

Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2

feet into piers. Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts) and smallexchanger, the anchorage is acceptable by SRT judgment.

21

21

2-HE-14

2-HE-15E &15W (2exchangers)

LETDOWN HEATEXCHANGER

EAST k WESTCOMPONENTCOOLING WATERHEATEXCHANGER

AUXILIARY

AUXILIARY

633

609

Exchanger anchored with two 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8"

spacing. Vertical distance from the base ofexchanger to the C.G. ofexchanger is 13". Vertical distance from the base of the exchanger to

the top nozzle is 29". Anchorage adequacy was accepted based on a

short hand calculation.Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforcedsaddles. Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts. There are four 1"

wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.

C.G. ofexchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.

Anchorage screened based on a hand calculation for 1-HE-15E.

32


Class

21 2-HE-17E & 17WDescri tion

EAST &WESTRESIDUAL HEATREMOVALHEATEXCHANGER

BuildinAUXILIARY

El.609

Descri tion of Confi oration and Anchora e EvaluationVery well engineered support structure. There is a ring support at top of the

exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the four quadrants. This takes the

overturning loads on the exchanger. Bottom support is a heavy duty steel gussetstructure supported by two peers. There are two bolts in each peer. The supportstructure for the exchanger is obviously well engineered.

21 2-HE-18E & 18 W EAST& WESTCONTAINMENTSPRAY HEATEXCHANGER

AUXILIARY 609

Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis. Based on the inspectionand anchorage data collected, the Heat Exchangers are adequate.

Very well engineered support structure. There is a ring support at top of theexchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the four quadrants. This takes theoverturning loads on the exchanger. Bottom support (at about the quarter point of the

exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below) is a heavy duty ringwith gussets at the bolt locations. These are bolted to a steel support structure that is

obviously well engineered.

21 2-HE-32E &32W EAST & WESTRESIDUAL HEATREMOVALPUMPPP-35EMECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 573

Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis. Based on the inspectionand anchorage data collected the Heat Exchanger is adequate.8" in diameter by 2" long exchanger, attached to East Residual Heat Removal Pumpwith two 5/8" bolts. Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box,however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.

Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by SRT judgment.

33

Table 3 (Continued)Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)

Class

21

ID2-HE-33E &33W (2exchangers)

DescriptionEAST & WESTCONTAINMENTSPRAY PUMP PP-

9E MECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERS

BuildingAUXILIARY

El.573

Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, is not attached to the East

Containment Spray Pump as shown on the anchorage sketch, however

piping can support the small exchanger. Could have screened with the

pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed

separately oh the SSEL.

21 2-HE-34-NE,34-NW, 34-SE,&34-SW (4exchangers)

NORTH &SOUTHSAFETYINJECTION PUMPPP-26N

OUTBOARDMECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 587

Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North SafetyInjection Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the

pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listedseparately on the SSEL.


2-HE-35N & NORTH &SOUTH35S (2 Coolers) SAFETY

INJECTION PUMPPP-26N LUBE OILCOOLERS

AUXILIARY 587 Small exchanger 1'-5" long by 4" in diameter by 8-3/4", attached toNorth Safety Injection Pump with four 1/4" bolts. Could have screened

with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger waslisted separately on the SSEL.



Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21 2-HE-36-EN,

36-ES, 36-WN,36-WS (4exchangers)

EAST & WESTCENTRIFUGALCHARGING PUMP PP-

50E INBOARDMECHANICALSEALHEAT EXCHANGERS

AUXILIARY 587 6" in diameter 8-3/4" high heat exchanger, attached to East Centrifugal ChargingPump with two I/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pump using the rule ofthe box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.


21

21

2-HE-37E,37W

~ 2-HE-38E* &38W

EAST & WESTCENTRIFUGALCHARGING PUMP PP-

50E GEAR OILCOOLER

EAST &WESTCENTRIFUGALCHARGING PUMP PP-

50E LUBE OIL COOLER

AUXILIARY 587

AUXILIARY 587

Exchanger I'-6" long and 5" in diameter attached to reinforced plate support withfour I/2" bolts. Plate support bolted to East Centrifugal Charging Pump withthree I/2" bolts. Could have screened using the rule of the box, however the

exchanger has a separate SSEL listing.


Small exchanger I'-6" long and 5" in diameter bolted to 2 1'ong channelcolumns that are welded to the skid of the East Centrifugal Charging Pump.Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however theexchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.

21 2-HE-47-ABN&, 47-ABS, 47-CDN &47-CDS (4aAercoolers)

AB &CD EMERGENCYDIESEL NORTHCOMBUSTION AIRAFTER-COOLERS

AUXILIARY 587Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.Aftercooler transfers its lateral load to the inlet manifolds. Gravity loads are

carried by a post on a spring hanger base, so the post is incapable ofcarryinlateral or longitudinal load.

The Diesel Generator Turbochargers in Unit 2 were replaced in a recent outa< e.

As part of the modil ication an analysis was perlonned for thc associated pipingand the aAercoolers. Allsupports met the D.C. Cook acceptance criteria.

35

Table 3 (Continued)Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)

Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21 2-QP-21 SOUTH BORIC ACID

BLENDERAUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Blender supported by piping. It is in-line with the pipe between two

pipe supports offthe floor. Blender very small (6" in diameter and I I" long).

21

21

21

21

2-QT-107- AB&CD (2 tanks)

2-QT-110-AB&CD(2 Coolers)

2-QT-115-AB& CD(2Tanks)

2-QT-131-AB& CD(2Coolers)

AB & CD EMERGENCYDIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKS

AB &CD EMERGENCYDIESEL LUBE OILCOOLER

AB &CD EMERGENCYDIESEL LUBE OILSUMP TANKS

AB &CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKETWATER COOLER

AUXILIARY 587

AUXILIARY 5/7

AUXILIARY 579

AUXILIARY 587

Screened based on drawings (insulation precluded inspection of the blenderconnection to the piping system) and inspection for interactions.Horizontal tanks which sits on two saddles. Each saddle has two I/4" thick plates,forming a "U",with no gussets. There are two 5/8" anchors per saddle.

A Horizontal Tank Analysis was performed to show that the tank anchorage is

adequate.

Lube Oil Coolers, mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" Wedge type anchors.

External ANCHOR4 analysis for 2-QT-110-CD was performed. Based on the

results of this evaluation both coolers were screened.

The tank sits on two saddles, two plates per saddle, I/O" thick. There are two 3/4"

anchors per saddle. There are four anchors in total for the tank.

Anchorage screened based on review of the anchorage inspection documentationand the vendor qualification of the tanks.

Jacket Water Cooler mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" wedge type expansionanchors.

An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-131-CD. Based on that analysis bothcoolers were screened.

36


Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21 2-QT-133-A B

&CD (2 tanks)AB&CDEMERGENCYDIESEL JACKETWATER SURGETANK

AUXILIARY 587 100 GAL. TANK,2'-6" D x 3'.The surge tanks are supported (bolted) to a shelf. The shelf is boltedto the wall by four 7/8" anchors.

21 2-QT- l34-AB&CD4 (2tanks)

AB &CDEMERGENCYDIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATERHEATER (TANK)

AUXILIARY 587

An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-133-CD. Based on thatanalysis both coolers were screened.

Heater tanks separately mounted by three 1/2" coupling rods and

Phillips Redhead wedge type anchors.

An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-134-CD. Based on that

analysis both coolers were screened.

21 2-QT-14 I-ABI,AB2,CDI, &CD2(4AirReceivers)

AB EMERGENCYDIESEL STARTINGAIR RECEIVER III

AUXILIARY 587 Airtanks anchored by four 5/8" J-bolts. Total weight for the tank is

6000 lbs.

The tank anchorage was verified by an ANCHOR4 analysis. Nozzleloads were included.

21 2-TK-10 REACTOR COOLANTLETDOWN VOLUMECONTROL TANK

AUXILIARY 609 Tank on four wide flange legs, 90 inches in diameter and 120 inchesin height.

The tank leg support and anchorage was screened based on a handcalculation.

37


Class21

ID2-TK- I I

DescriptionBORON INJECTIONTANK

BuildingAUXILIARY

El.612

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationTank is about 5'n diameter by 10'n height supported by 4 WideFlange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/8" flange) 4'-4" in height..

Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/ two embedded 1 3/4" bolts.

Weld of leg to tank about 14" in length and 1/4" thickness on each sideof the wide flange and 10" at the top of the wide flange.

21

21

2-TK-12S

2-TK-150

SOUTH BORIC ACIDSTORAGE TANK

MAINSTEAM LEADSCONDENSATE DRAINTANK

AUXILIARY

AUXILIARY

587

600

The seismic evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) indicatesthat it is seismically adequate. The Boron Injection Tank is muchsmaller but has about the same support. Therefore, Tank 2-TK-11 is

judged adequate based on comparisonBoric Acid Tank on four Wide Flange Beam Legs.

Tank anchorage and wide flange legs were evaluated using a handcalculation. The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are

adequate.

Small horizontal tank bolted to wall in-line with the piping system.

Anchorage was judged acceptable based on the walkdown and a

review of the anchorage inspection documentation.

38


Class21

ID2-TK-32

DescriptionCONDENSATESTORAGE TANK

BuildingGROUNDS 609

Description of Configuration and Anchorage EvaluationLarge flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height,500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs. Anchored with thirty 3/8" th

x 5" w x 4' 4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epthwith a 2" radius hook at the end.

The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 RWST 1-

TK-33 and 2-TK-33. The calculation for the RWST resulted in theconclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concretewas sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.

The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST. Thecalculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overallsafety factor of2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.

21 2-TK-33 REFUELINGWATER STORAGETANK

GROUNDS 609

The CST was screened based on a comparison of the significantattributes to the RWST.

Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'-0"

liquid tank 420,000 gallons and weighs 94,000 lbs. Anchored withtwenty-five 3/8" th x 5" w x 4' 4" long strap that is embedded in theconcrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.

A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG G1P criteria. Thecalculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and

embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the fullyieldstrength of the strap. The calculation for the RWST using the GIPmethodology indicated an overall safety factor of2.57 for overturningand 1.72 for shear.

39


Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation21 2-TK-37 COMPONENT

COOLING WATERSURGE TANK

AUXILIARY 650 Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height. Skirt is 4'-6" highfrom the top of the pad to skirt connection to tank. Skirt has 1/2"

thickness.. There are eight bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a

solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" width. Bolts supportedfrom 3" x 3" x 1/2" angle.

21 2-TK-76N*,76S

CONTROL ROOM AIRCONDITIONINGNORTH AND SOUTHCHILLWATEREXPANSION TANKS

AUXILIARY 650

2-TK-37 is similar to 1-TK-37. The support for 2-TK-37 wasscreened based on the hand calculation for 1-TK-37.Small tank 2'n length x 9 " in diameter on a 1" diameter pipingsystem. Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a

cantilevered angle (2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 3/8") about 1'-6" long. Anglewelded to a plate that is bolted to the reinforced block wall with three5/8" diameter through bolts (other side ofwall inspected and boltscame through).

Anchorage and support for these small tanks were accepted by SRTjudgment after the walkdown and a review of the anchorageinspection documentation.

40

Section 5.1.2 states that all four tanks reviewed met the intent of the GIP. Indicate that thcGIP-2 guidclincs and methodology are fully.mct or identify any deviations from thcguidelines and thc methodology. Provide calculations for determining thc seismic adequacyof the tanks (ID 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32) using thc methodology dcscribcd in section 7 of thcGIP-2. The evaluation of thc anchors which restrain the tank movement should also beprovided.

The flat bottom tanks were screened based on calculations performed on August 25, 1989, prior tothe publication of the rev. 2 GIP. The evaluation performed followed the procedure available atthe time in the rev. 1 GIP. There are only minor differences between the two revisions that do notaffect the results due to the resulting high margins.

There are two differences in the configuration of the RWST (1-TK-33) that are not in conformancewith the GIP procedure: a) the tJR = .0007351 which is less than the limits of the GIP screeningtable of .001; and b) the tank was not anchored with bolts but rather with twenty-five 3/8" x 5" x 4'

4" long straps that are embedded in the concrete at a two foot depth with a two inch radius hookat the end.

The tJR issue was accounted for by making an appropriate adjustment in the calculated naturalfrequency for the tank. The anchorage was considered by replacing the strap in the calculationwith bolts ofequivalent area and strength. Both of these modifications meet the intent of the GIPguidelines. The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment inthe concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The calculation for theRWST using the Rev. 1 GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 foroverturning and 1.72 for shear. In order to obtain further assurance that the RWST is seismicallyadequate a calculation that conformed to'ASCE Standard 4-86 was performed and'yielded similarresults.

The strap detail for the CST (2-TK-32) is identical to the strap for the RWST (1-TK-33). Thecalculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment inthe concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The CST also has a verysimilar configuration as this RWST. The CST was therefore screened based on a comparison ofthe significant attributes to the RWST.

The SEWS for 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32 including the calculations are included as attachment 4.

7i Section 5.1.5 states that horizontal tanks and heat cxchangers rcviewcd mct thc intent of thcGIP. Indicate that the GIP-2 guidelines and methodology are fully met or identify anydeviations from them. Provide calculations using the methodology described in section 7 ofthe GIP-2 for the following tanks and cxchangers: 1-HE-14, 2-HK-15K, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB and 2-QT-115-CD. The evaluation of the anchors which restrain thc tankmovement should also be provided.

As previously discussed in response to questions 2 and 5, anchorage and support evaluations tookseveral different forms consistent with the GIP. These forms included for tanks and heatexchangers: a) detailed evaluations using the step by step procedure in section 7.4 of the GIP; b)detailed hand calculations; c) screening based on an anchorage evaluation for an identical item ofequipment and anchorage or a worst case evaluation ofa similar item; or d) the SRT judged, based

on the weight and anchorage of the equipment, that the anchorage obviously met the GIPscreening criteria. The GIP-2 guidelines for adequate strength of the tanks or exchangers, saddlesand anchorage are met for all horizontal tanks and heat exchangers that were identified in the finalreport as screened. The step by step procedure in section 7.4 was not used for supports that wereobviously rugged based on the inspection. Exchangers that did not meet 'the applicable ranges ofparameters and assumptions contained in table 7-6 of the GIP could not be evaluated with thesection 7.4 procedure. These tanks were evaluated as, described in tables 2 and 3 of this responseto item 5 of the RAI.

SEWS that include the calculations and the anchorage inspection documentation for 1-HE-14, 2-HE-15E, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB and 2-QT-115-CD are contained in attachment 5 of thissubmittal. The evaluations for 1-HE-15E and 1-QT-107-CD are also provided since the screeningfor 2-HE-15E and 1-QT-107-AB are based on these evaluations, respectively. These SEWS andcalculations provide a good cross section of the evaluations performed. The calculation for 1-HE-14 was a short hand calculation that indicated the anchorage had a safety margin of eight. A handcalculation was performed for 1-HE-15E that was also used to screen 2-HE-15E. These had acalculated safety margin of four. Heat exchanger 12-HE-16N and tanks 1-QT-107-CD and 2-QT-115-CD included a calculation using the step by step methodology in section 7.4 of the GIP.

S) Tables 6-1 and 6-2 provide a summary of the limited analytical reviews (LARS) for thcsclcctcd cable and conduit raceways. Provide copies of the calculations of the analyses forresolution of thc outlicrs listed as LARNumbers 005, 011, 022 and 023. Also provide typicalsample calculations for thc raceways that arc not selected as outliers (i.e., LAR Numbers001, 010, 027 and 030).

The requested information is contained in attachment 6 to this RAI.

y 9) Discuss thc issue described in thc Information Notice 95-49 regarding Thermo-Lag panels,in particular, thc issue regarding seismic resistance capability of the cable tray and its

support when appropriate weight and modulus of the Thermo-Lag are included in thcanalysis.

The fire-wrapped raceways were walked-down as part of the USI A-46 raceway evaluations, alongwith all of the other raceways in the plant. The weight of the Thermo-Lag material was considered

in choosing LARS for the USI A-46 effort. None of the hangers supporting fire-wrappedraceways were selected for LARbecause: (1) the SRT did not find them to be an enveloping case,

i.e., other hangers of similar construction were more heavily loaded; and (2) the SRT was awarethat the hangers supporting the fire-wrapped raceways had been evaluated and, unlike most otherrod hangers in the plant, had been laterally braced.

In addition, in response to NRC bulletin 92-01 and generic letter 92-08, we performed a walkdown ofall Thermo-Lag installations in the plant to determine whether seismically induced failureof the Thermo-Lag could result in the Thermo-Lag falling and damaging nearby equipment. Thiswalk down covered all Thermo-Lag installations, including conduits and cable trays, wallpilasters, and electrical equipment. The walkdown team concluded that the Thermo-Lag was wellsecured, so that large sections could not fall, but smaller pieces (golfball size and smaller) couldfall if local sections of the Thermo-Lag fractured. As a result of the walkdown Thermo-Lagmaterial was removed from some of the conduits to address the safety interface condition.

In the mid 1980s, a minimum number (<10 %) of the cable tray and conduit raceways were fire-wrapped with Thermo-Lag material as part of our 10 CFR 50 Appendix R efforts. Some of theThermo-Lag material in the plant is being removed and will be replaced with DARMATTmaterial. In some instances, the Thermo-Lag was removed and was not replaced by any other typeofmaterial...

44

ATTACHMENT2 TO AEP:NRC:1040E

SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS,ANDANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION

FOR CLASS 1 THROUGH 20 EQUIPMENTRAI ITEM 2

This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspectiondocumentation for a cross section of class 1 through 20 equipment items. The samples selectedare designated with an * in Table 1 of this RAI. The following examples are included:

lass

1-ABD-A2-CRID-1-CVT1-1'P-10W

14

17

1-HV-AFP-Mk12-HV-E W-71-A W-A -A

1- Mk:-15 -AB 2- Mk:-150-2-A11

Ol/16/92PG. HO.I )

SAfE SNUIOOuN EoulpHENT LIST (SSELup)

fUHCI ION: 600 VAC STSTEH

Equipment Io ~ 1-ABD-A

Equi pment Class: Train: I

Drawing Number: 1-12001 1-12010

Systemt ELECTRICAL OlSTRIBUTIOH 600VAC

Equip Description: 600VAC NCC ABD-A

Bul lding: AUXILIART Roomt AB EHERG OIESEL GENERATOR ROON Etevationt 587

Normal state: Desired st'ate: Power Required: Sort: U,

Supporting System Drawing Munbert

Required Interconnections and Suppo t Cupport ing Components:

Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR flin/Optt HIM

Alias Hubert

AOOITIOHAL IMFORNATIOM

Power Train: B

Component Scrvedt 600Y KCC ABD-A

Manufacturer: CUTLER-HAMMER Model:

Panel:

Elem Drawing: uiring Drawingt 1-9QOS I-9C206

Power Source: 1-llAS

ualkdownt F Relay Only: H

Component Type: HCC

ISO Drawings:

Detailed Location: IN tHE MU RE'GIOM OF tHE ROONROON, NEAR THE NORTH MALL

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 1 of 12

ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0)Description: 600VAC MCC ABD-A

Class: 1. Motor Control Centers

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NWREGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER

SEISMIC CAPACITYVS DEMAND

Elevation where equipment receives seismic inputElevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = )Capacity based on: 1.50 Bounding SpectrumDemandbasedon: 1.00 RealisticMedian-CenteredFloorResponseSpectra

587.00N/AN/A

'I.200

LOG

0.0000.50

1

'

II \

/

I

/

/

LOG Hz

Capacity ..... Demand

50.00

CapacitDemand 1

Demand 2

FileCAGIPtGIPtspectra.desC:tGIP'PROJ0035tspectra.desC.'tGIPIPROJ0035'Lspectra.dos

Label Boundin S ctrumBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION587 BROADEN NBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION587 BROADEN N

Does capacity exceed demand'

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control CentersDescription: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN

THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM

MCC/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Data BaseMCC/BS Caveat 2 - Rating of 600 V or Less.MCC/BS Caveat 3 - Adjacent Cabinets Bolted TogetherMCC/BS Caveat 4 - Attached Weight of 100 Pounds or Less.MCC/BS Caveat 5 - Externaliy Attached Items Rigidly Anchored.MCC/BS Caveat 6 - General Configuration Similar to NEMAStandards.MCC/BS Caveat 7- Cutouts Not LargeMCC/BS Caveat 8- Doors/Buckets Secured.MCC/BS Caveat 9 - Natural Frequency Relative to 8 Hz LimitConsidered.MCC/BS Caveat 10 - Adequate Anchorage.MCC/BS Caveat 11 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.MCC/BS Caveat 12 - No Other Concerns

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum/

ANCHORAGE

YesYesYesN/AYesYesYesYesN/AYesYesYes

1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq.,

damping, center of rotation).3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts

and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment

length, anchor spacing, freewdge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concretecracking.

6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 .7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity

reduction for expansion anchors.8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been

considered.9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.

Are anchorage requirements met'?

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesYes

Yes

YesYesYes

D.C..COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0)Description: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or

structures.3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility.4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5. No other adverse concerns were found.

Is equipment free of interaction effects?

YesYes

YesYesYes

CO+IME~N

1-ABD-A& 1-ABD-B in the same box.

5 vertical panels on 4" concrete pad.

Anchorage by bolts in front 4 1/2" J-bolts and 2 1/2" expansion anchors. Anchorage by welds in back 6 2" long3/16" fillet.

Anchor Pattern:

f x ][ x][x ][ x][x x]

Weight of MCC is a maximum of 800 Ibs/cabinet x 5 = 4000 Ibs, which was used in the anchor analysis.

The AEPSC Rev. 0 report" Fundamental Resonant Frequencies of Cook Nuclear Plant Cabinets, Panels, andRacks in Auxiliary Building Complex ( Determined By In-Situ Modal Testing; Year 1985 and 1986)" dated August10, 1994 documents the testing of four MCC assemblies. The minimum fundamental frequancy from these testswas 9.6 Hz for MCC assembly 2-ABD-B/ABD-A.The SRT based on this report judged that the frequancy for MCCassembly 1-ABD-A/ABD-B was above 8 Hz. However, for conservatism credit for MCC Assembly 1-ABD-A/ABD-Bbeing above 8 Hz. was not taken, and therefore the caveats on this SEWs related to the 8 Hz issue were answeredN/A. This enabled the conservative use of the 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum vs. floor spectrum comparison for capacityvs. demand and the use of the peak of the 5% damped floor spectrum for the anchorage calculations.

No interaction concern.

Zap 345 MCC ABD-ABBZap,346 Typ. Opening @ bottom.

Anchor Evaluation Performed by Bahaa Mahmoud - S8AChecked by George Gary Thomas.

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control CentersDescription: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN



Anchor calculation additional margin = 1.634

Evaluated by Gary Thomas and Satyan Sharma on 7/17/92.

Evaluated by: Date:

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0)Description: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


MCC ABD-AM TYP. OPENING AT BOTTOM.

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0)Description: 600VAC MCC ABD-A


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


ANCHOR Report

Eargm~Z

'esponseSpectrum: Instructure Realistic

Frequency: GIP - Flexible

Percent Damping: GIP - 5.00

Spectral Values:

DirectionNorth - SouthEast - WestVertical

Acceleration (g's)1.041.040.17

Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00

Combination Criteria: SRSS

~We ggs

Number ofWeights: 1

No Weight1 4000.00 50.000 10.000 45.000

Fgrrgg

Number of External Forces: 0

Eunmh'umberof External Moments: 0

fgc~LIRJRR

Number of Anchor types: 2

Tension ShearUltimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control CentersDescription: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EOG RM, IN



No. Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact1 1/2

2 1/2

Other

Other

J-Bolt (90deg)

UnknownExpansion

Anchor

6660.00 3330.00

2290.00 2380.00

1.00

1.00

0.30

0.30

1.00

1.00

Czmrch.

Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.

Reduction Factor: 0.85

W~Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.

Surry~c

Number of Surfaces: 1

Surface Orientation

No

DirectionComp

0.000

DirectionComp

Ny0.000

DirectionComp

1.000

Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹ 1

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD.-A(Rev. 0)Description: 600VAC MCC ABD-A


Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


4x

Legend for Anchor Patterns

Anchor Bolts:

Concrete Uncs:

Concrete Potnts: ~IIIINeid Uncs:

knobs"

Number of Anchors: 6

AnchNo. Id

1 1

2 1

3 1

4 25 26 1

Coord3.750

36.50043.80076.60083.90096.300

Coord1.5001.5001.5001.5001.5001.500

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000 000

SurfId

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2l14I92Status: YesSheet 9 of 12

ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0)Description: 600YAC MCC ABD-A


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Rovi/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


¹ of elements per line: 1

Number of Concrete Lines: 4

NoStart

X-Coord0.000

100.00Q100.000

0.000

StartY-Coord

1.5001.500

17.00017.000

StartZ-Coo rd

0.0000.0000.0000.000

EndX-Coord100.000100.000

0.0000.000

EndY-Coord

1.50017.00017.0000.000

EndZ-Coord

0.0000.0000.0000.000

SfId

LineWidth

2.0002.0002.QQQ

2.000

Number of Concrete Points: 0


Number of Weld Lines: 6

StartNo X-Coord

StartY-Coord

StartZ-Coord

EndX-Coord

EndY-Coord

EndZ-Coo rd ld

LineWidth

0.00015.400

3 — 19.40056.50059.90096.100

18.50018.50018.50018.50018.50018.500

0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

2.25017.60021.60058.60062.10098.400

18.50018.50018.50018.50018.50018.500

0.000 1

0.000 1

0.000 1

0.000 1

0.0000.000 1

0.1250.1250.1250.1870.1870.187

Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 1

Embedment Length: (1 3.60 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes


Embedment Length: (13 40 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID:1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control CentersDescription: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 58?.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN




Embedment Length: (13.60 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes


Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes


Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes


Embedment Length: (13.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity}:=27.25 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes

Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes

AncNo Id

1 1

2 1

3 1

4 2

5 2

6 1

PaIVVali

3750.913330.003708.293330.003750.913330.001717.501785.001717.501785.003729.603330.00

Pallr/VallrN/A

N/ANIAN/AN/ANIAN/AN/AN/A

N/A

RT RN RLX 0.56X 1.00X 0.56X 1.00X 0.56X 1.00X XX XX XX XX 0.56X 1.00

RG RS REX XX X,X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX X

RF RCX XX XX X

X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX X

RR RP RB1.00 X X1.00 X X1.00 X X1.00 X X1.00 X X1.00 X X0.75 X X0.75 X X0.75 X X0.75 X X1.00 X X1.00 X X

RM

N/A = Not ApplicablePall = Allowable Pull without Reduced InspectionVali = Allowable Shear without Reduced InspectionPallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced InspectionVallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

= Outlier= Reduction Factor Not Used

RT = Reduction Factor for Type of AnchorageRN = Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0)Description: 600VAC MCC ABD-A


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEARTHE N WALL


RL = Reduction Factor for EmbedmentRG = Reduction Factor for Gap at AnchorsRS = Reduction Factor for SpacingRE = Reduction Factor for Edge DistanceRF = Reduction Factor for Concrete StrengthRC = Reduction Factor for Concrete CracksRR = Reduction Factor for Essential RelaysRP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying ActionRB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load PathRM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads

e

Analysis Performed: Yes

Type ofAnalysis: Regular

Spectral Accelerations (G's)

10

121314

1617

1920

22

N-S

1.038-1.038-1.0381.0381.038

-1.0381.038

-1.0380.415

-0.4150.415

-0.415-0.4150.4150.415

-0.4150.415

-0.4150.415

-0.415-0.4150.4150.416

0.415-0.4150.415

-0.415-0.4150.4150.415

-0.4151.038

-1.038-1.0381.0381.038

-1.0381.038

-1.0380.415

-0.4150.415

-0.4150.415

-0.415-0.415

Vertical0.067

-0.0670.067

-0.0670.067

-0.067-0.0670.0670.067

-0.0670.067

-0.0670.067

-0.067-0.0670.0670.167

-0.167-0.1670.1670.167

-0.1670.167

Safety Factor3.6537.0483.5267.0856.8633.6523.7876.8191.6343.9903.9761.6761.6434.0551.6663.9123.8169.4874.3028.4943.8389 6738.579

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control CentersDescription: 600VAC MCC ABD-ABuilding: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN



24 Z.415 0.415 -0.167 4.333

Minimum Safety Factor: 1.634.

The Anchorage Capacity is 1.634 times greater than the Demand

**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019TTACHHENT NO. 1

ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET

Bldg. Location

Installation dwg. / Rev.

Anchora e Arran ement SketchEquipment No.

/ II

VIE

L ~

Q 4pOg

( 7

E, -v. K E.i Lco'm< G.

0

QOCOC.RETG

( P~o4

Drawn by:Verified by:

QuM./Cert. Inspector

Date:Date:

l

~q~n

Reviewed by: Date:nstructz.on Anchor Review Engineer

Page 1 of 3

Revision 1

**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019TTACHMENT NO. 1


Ab F~ c,. i-.. Ce~ Q.~Unzt I Bldg. Locate.on


Anchora e Arran ement Sketch

Equipment No.

I0 ~ 0

~ ~ r ~ 1 I

CLEi'-; 8) ) / ~r>Z~r-~

I rr

0

ELCJ. /AC+ Lop>W)|'h Z


Qua1. /Cert. Inspector

Date:Date.

Reviewed by: Date: 7 2»~nstructzon Anchor Review Engineer

Page 1 of 3Revision 1

* ' CHP 5021. CCD. 019.TTACHMENT NO. 1


4'b C ~ c,. ~.egg P~Un3.t g

- 3"/&-Bldg. Locate.on



3-'I 6'-0t< cpa pygmy 4p& %%cd

P'g) g Q c~ll

LJL~>

A~5 An~So~

( ~!

2-'FV»

0

1~/A, l 3'/g

l'/i Typ

0VL fg


Qual./Cert. Inspector

Date:Date: >-r~

Reviewed by: Date:onstructzon Anchor Reve.ew Engineer


!

D ~ ~ II

0

~ ~

~ ~

C ~

I I ~ ~

I ~ ~

~ l~4

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

o ~

~ ~

~ II II

~ - r.

Q

P 0

R%Ã~%~%~%%%~~~jIIIIHRIIIIIIIIWHIIINIIIRIIIRRLLI551IIWIIILLeimmmimemrr

RRIml%NIRSIj!mLLWRSHHR%WSLL~~5%~Wiiiimeemrr0' I$~%k%$%R%5%$%WW

~ ~l.~ l

I '

alMKWF

sC

**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 03.9ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Equipment No.: l- SO-

Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: ! - G3-

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Dwg No.: 2"3

Weld IDT e

SizeLen thCracks Yes

0Yes Yes

3 II

Yesde

C

3 III

Yes Yes<HZ'esNoYesNo

Weld T e Codes1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 = Groove

Lack ofPenetrationPorosity

Yes YesCZb

Yes Yes Yes

Yes Yes

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

0 (=

SC(-Qs 4 Wrv ~ a.r <4'. W ~4(nc+ +0 aO KWUQS~Q gh'4e.

ULLQ DCTRIL

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No

Reviewed by:ons ruc ron re Date: 7 z fe

Date:

Verified by:ua . era. npsec or 0,„:;I",: t !.<(.'i:I..".I "l!i!!Ao(.LLiP

i>IJ( 'I ':.:

4-'uc

ron nc or eve.ew ngzneerf6~~( r ;,i>(;!(I;.(r "..I('('((lhI; LI,:V/E!) Date:

QQIIIJ( ~ ~,. „'age 3 of 3

Equipment No.:

Tightness esvaoxzsned by "Snug Fit"Tightness verified by: ~- ',(

Qual. /Cert. Inspector

Comments: 4 Mc~ 9 4c >) z s

S 5 A DEPARTl4ENTCONTROLLED DOCUMENT

COPY NO.

JOB ORDER NO.:

12 SHP 5050 NDE.008ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Uf TRASONXC TEST REPORT

REPORT DATE: 8 ~ REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponent:

ItemMaterialOther

Test Unit/ S/NWFrea./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

TEST DATA REMARKS

Ic' '

c

8'ERFORMED

BY:

REVIEWED BY: WD

FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1

f EVEf:~ DATE:

'VEE: ~ DATE:

Page 1 OERevision 0

Equip Xd: 2-CRID-I-CVT Train: 2 Equip Class: 4

Drawing No.: 2-12050

ction: 120 VAC SYSTEM

System: 120V CONTROL ROOM XNSTRUMENTATXON DXSTRIBUTXON

Equip Desc: 10KVA TRANSFORMER — CONSTANT VOLTAGE

Building: AUXILIARY Room: 4KV ROOM — 600 VOLTS SWITCHGEAR AREA

Elev: 609 Sort: S,R Notes:

Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd:

Support System Drawing: 2-98077, 2-12050

Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MXN

Alias No:

Comp Served:

Power Train: A

MFR: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.

el: XSL12100

el:Elem. Drawing: 2-98077

Wiring Drawing: 2-91332

Power Source: 2-EZC-C-5AR

Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y

Comp Type: TRANSFORMERk

Xso Diawing:

Location: XN THE MIDDLE EAST REGXON OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN

DC Cook Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)

GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 1 of 11

ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V

SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLEEAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS21B SUPPLY TRAIN

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100


Elevation where equipment receives seismic inputElevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 8.00)Capacity based on: 1.50 * Bounding SpectrumDemand based on: 1.00 * Realistic Mean-Centered Floor Response Spectra

633.00N/AN/A

1.200

LOG

0.085

\

/\

r/I

//

//r

0.S0 LOG HzCapacity ..... Demand

S0.00

CapacityDemand 1

Demand 2

C:tGIPLGIPtspectra.desC."tGIP'PROJ0032tspectra.desC:tGIPLPROJ0032tspectra.des

RecordLabellBounding SpectrumBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION633 BROADEN NBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATIONI633IBROADENN



GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92Status: YesSheet 2 of 11

ID: 2-CRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class .'. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V




TRN/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassTRN/BS Caveat 2 - Rating of 4.16 KVor Less.

'RN/BSCaveat 3- Transformer Coils Postively Restrained Within CabinetTRN/BS Caveat 4- Coils Top Braced or Anal zed for Large Transformers.TRN/BS Caveat 5- Clearance Between Energized Component and Cabinet.TRN/BS Caveat 6- Adequate Slack in High Voltage Leads.TRN/BS Caveat 7- Wall-Mounted Units Anchored Close to Enclosure Structure.TRN/BS Caveat 8 - Weak-Way Bending of Thin Webs Evaluated.TRN/BS Caveat 9 - Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together.TRN/BS Caveat 10 - Doors Secured.TRN/BS Caveat 11 - Adequate AnchorageTRN/BS Caveat 12- Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.TRN/BS Caveat 13 - No Other Concerns.

YesYesYesN/AYesYesN/AYesN/AYesYesN/AYes

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?

ANCHORAGE



and washers, expansion anchor tightness,'etc.)5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment~ length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete-

cracking.6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/47. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity


considered.9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes

Are anchorage requirements met?

DC Cook Unit 2


ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT'( Rev. 0 ) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V



INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures2. Ifthe equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or


YesN/A

YesYesYes

Is equipment free of interaction effects'P

C L D

~CON IE~S

SRT: George G. Thomas (S8A) and Satyan Sharma -10/29/92

Anchorage: Anchorage is 1/2" diameter wedge expansion bolts. Most likely they are Phillips anchors based onthe Unit 1 GRID-CVT's. Used unknown expansion anchor in ANCHOR analysis for conservatism. Minimumembedment is 2-13/16" above GIP minimum embedment for all types of 1/2" expansion anchors.

Weight estimate based on maximum weight for an inverter in Table C.1-1 of the GIP (configuration similar to aninverter). Weight estimate is 45 Ibs/ft"3.

Weight = (4.5' 2.5' 2.33') x 45 Ibs/ft"3 = 1180 Ib

Fluorescent light above unit could come out. However interaction judged non4amaging

Thin 3/16" thick angles at base of transformer that is bolted to the base channel is gusseted in two locations. (Noweak way bending).

Frequency judged by the SRT to be at least 8 Hz.

ANCHOR analysis indicates an additional factor of safety of 1.97.

Pictures: Zap shot 2629 -Inside CabinetZap shot 2630 —Outside of TransformerZap shot 2631 —Braced Base Channels



ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT ( Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM -600V



Evaluated by: Date:

// «gzAttachment: PicturesAttachment: ANCHOR Report



ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0 ) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V



P IC~UIRg$

C

t

Braced Base Channels Inside Cabinet

'

Outside of Transformer



ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE8uilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00


Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600VSWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLEEAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC 8US218 SUPPLY TRAIN

ANCHOR Report

~~~use'esponseSpectrum:!nstructure Realistic

Frequency: User - 8.00Percent Damping: User - 5.00

Spectral Values:DirectionNorth - SouthEast - WestVertical


Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00Combination Criteria: SRSS

W~~s'umber of Weights: 1

No Weight1 1180.00 14.000 14.250 35.375

Porcine


gl~oe~sNumber of External Moments: 0

~llowat~s.~n~Number of Anchor types: 1

Ultimate UltimateTension

InterShearInter Saf

No Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear 'oeff Coeff Fact1/2 Other Unknown

ExpansionAnchor

2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00

~rgbUltimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.

DC Cook Unit 2


ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00



Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600VSWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLEEAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS218 SUPPLY TRAIN

~W

Allowable Stress: 0 psi.

~uNumber of Surfaces: 1

Surface OrientationDirection

Comp

0.000

DirectionComp

0.000

DirectionComp

1.000

Anchor Pattern for Surface 0 1




ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V



Anchor Bolts:

Concrete Lines: ~ItinConcrete Points: ~mtmW'eld Lines '.

~Ge retryAn(QIL'Number of Anchors: 4

NoAnch

Id Coord1.500

26.4381.750

26.875

Coord0.7500.750

27.75027.750

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.000

SurfId

ft of elements per line: 1


NoStart

X-Coord0.0000.000

StartY-Coord

0.89127.609

Sta~Z-Coord

0.0000.000

EndX-Coord

28.06328.000

EndY-Coord

0.89127.609

EndZ-Coord

0.0000.000

SfId

LineWidth

1.7811.781


KeldJ.um4 of elements per line: 5Number of Weld Lines: 0

er i in u i a oReduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 1

OC Cook Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V



Adequately Installed: YesGap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% BoltsEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes








AncNo Id

PaIVVali

Pallr/Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM

1' 1202.25 N/A 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1428.001202.25

N/AN/A

0.60 1.000.60 1.00

X 1.00 1.00X 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.88 1.00 1.00

1.001.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.00



ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V


Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL1 2100

1428.00 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.003 1 1202.25 NIA

1428.00 NIANIA1202.25

1428.00 NIA

0.60 1.00 X0.60 1.00 X0.60 1.00 X0.60 1.00 X

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 0.88 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.OO O.88 1.OO

1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

1.001.001.001.00

N/AI aliVanPallrVallr

RT

RLRGRS

RCRRRP

= Not Applicable= Allowable Pull without Reduced inspection= Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection= Allowable Puli with Reduced Inspection= Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection= Outlier= Reduction Factor Not Used= Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage= Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy= Reduction Factor for Embedment= Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors= Reduction Factor for Spacing= Reduction Factor for Edge Distance= Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength= Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks= Reduction Factor for Essential Relays= Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action= Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path= Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads


Type of Analysis: RegularSpectral Accelerations (G's)

N-S0.362

-0.362-0.3620.3620.362

-0.3620.362

-0.3620.145

E-W0.145

-0.1450.145

-0.145-0.1450.1450.145

-0.1450.362

Vertical0.073

-0.0730.073

-0.0730.073

-0.073-0.0730.0730.073

Safety Factor1.9692.0062.0091.9711.9712.0081.9692.0073.820

DC Cook Unit 2


ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev. 0) Class: 4. TransformersDescription: 10KVATRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGEBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00


Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600VSWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLFEAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS21B SUPPLY TRAIN

10

1213141516171819

2021222324

-0.1450.145

-0.145-0.1450.1450.145

-0.1450.145

-0.1450.145

-0.145-0.1450.1450.145

-0.145

- -0.362-0.3620.3620.362

-0.3620.362

-0.3620.145

-0.1450.145

-0.1450.145

-0.145-0.1450.145

-0.0730.073

-0.0730.073

-0.073-0.0730.0730.183

-0.183-0.1830.1830.183

-0.1830.183

-0.183

4.1963.8114.1983.86T4.1444.1463.8694.9175.0104.9225.0165.0274.9344.9285.022

Minimum Safety Factor: 1.969


Coo

Component Ão.2 ( ~~~ "T C4T Claca ~

Any particular area tha Sei.smic Review Team should pay extra attention totYes W Ho (Xf yes, check items that, apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor EmbedmentvAnchor Edge DistanceAnchor GapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack

Others (describe briefly)

If there is concern for Design Basis Di.screpancy, circle the «pplicableitem and explain.

Harcfvare Haintenance Type DiscrepancyDrawing Update Type Di.screpancyS igni.ffcant Operability/Design Basi.s DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:

Actions Taken:

Prepared Sy Dsta ~R-<< 3

**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Un1typt4 tR T3/2- W <~-n-9>



ANCHOR jNSPECTION DATA SHEET

AuK VAv ~0'7-'ldg.Location

4 Q.Pro-+-C.v wEquipment No.

2 -CFiQ- 7=C.VT

I ~ II

"'iiÃ7

OS> leaf. OV»

3II

il9 clonic)

ELp V. V low Looki'n

gtl

'Pao ~iNoR~h

Drawn by:Verified by. Q~(

Date: ri zv e»

Qual. /Cert. InspectorReviewed by: T Date: ~ ~ (l- 'l~

Construction Anc or Review Engineer


**12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Un1t Bldg.T3'~-II-9W

Location



+ /a. BoLT

GYP

EI-BQ- glE,A Lope.<toG- ER


Date:

Date:, I~.7- lZ.Qual. /Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: T " 4>'~4~~. Date:Construction An hor Review Engineer


++12 CHP 5021-CCD.Q19ATTACHMENT NO. 1


VAv ~~ 0 .'g'z5Un>.t 5 Bldg. Locationi>- Sq.7&- t

7 ~> <I 'I> C.~SO 2- QvfInstallation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.


~ls ~i)

d O'A

~ ~

IPIt e ~

~"~i"i> ~ ( Cur Y

t~".;ll >O )f95

Date: /l 2'. 7Drawn by:Verified by: 8 8(f. Date: IZ=l- I Z.

Qual. /Cert. InspectorReviewed by: T. +~'-<k. Date:

Construe won An hor Review Engineer


**12 CHP 502 1 . CCD. 0 1.9

( ATTACHMENT NO. 1

ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET

g /CA+ ~g v'P~ Dg- g" Fc

Unxt 5 Bldg. Location) ~ - 3 q)'o -('))

/ ) %-)l-I)> g Q I O-Z-C.vgInstallation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.


e

el0

'"4')

I:Ii~ Il ~

~ I

I II -3 II3II ~ rIrJ~)

D

3 - D'li~II- 9'/i).

l e n ~ + </) p'II'IA::«U lQ90

R'h l= )

Lc'qy, $

Drawn by: Date:Date: /2 7- "~.Verified b (

Qual. /Cert. XnspectorReviewed by: I')&<L~I Date:

Construction Anchor Review Engineer


lSSRSSLLLLRSLLL5WWHRESHWl5WRHSRI - - WLHLL~RHSSWS~~~~55%5%5%RHWS.5%RSWMMMWRI~~~~~~~M

4*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Equipment No.: ~. C~ 0- -VT'mbeddedSteel Dwg. No.:

PHYSXCAL CHARACTERXSTXCS

Dwg No..: ~V~<7i <-3 q7b-te

T~i~-n- 'I

Weld XD

T e

SizeLen th

O'I 4/~ Weld T e Codes1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 = Groove

Cracks


Yes

YesN

s0

0

Y s0

Yes

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Vt."~B )0 18'~

Equipment base

Reviewed'y:

Verified by:

flexible: 0 Yes I No T'> u ~~4~~~ons r c ron e

ons r son nc o evxew ngxneernua . er . npsec or

Date:

Date: I l.- il-

Date: IZ. 7-~ L

Page 3 of 3

Revision 1

S 8 A DEPARTMENTCONTROL.FO OOCUMENT

COPY NO.

12 SHP SOSO NDE.008ATTACHMENT NO. 1

ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT

ZOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: //3:~ ~ REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

Unit /~ComponentItem r " JMaterial >5Other

Test Unit/ S/NFreq./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

c - '() ~

TEST DATA REMARKS

/, g

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:

FORM NO. 12 SHP S050 NDE.008-1

LEVEL:~ DATE: /LEVEL: ~ DATE: ll

Page 'f 1Revision 0

Equipment No.: - CQX'Q-X-C.'d

Tightness established by "Snug Fit"Tightness verified by: & (."z <PL

'ual./Cert. Inspector

Comments:

01/16/92>G. MG. 72

sAFE'KvtoouN EGUIpHENT LisT (ssELMp)

FUMCTIOM: CCM

Equipment Class: 5 train: 1

Equipment IO: I-PP.IOM Orauing H +bert 1.5135A

SyStem: CCM

Equip Description: LIESt CCM PVHP

Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 KALLMAY Elevation: 609

Normal state: R/NR Oesired state: R Pouer Required: Y Sort: M,R

Suceorting System Orauing Herbert 1-12001 1-12060 1-98/05

Required Interconnections and Supporting Coeponentst 'I-T11A7 I.HCAB-3

fetv Related Status: NUCLEAR SR( Hin/Opt: HIN

AOOITIONAL IHFORHATION

IAl ias Hubert Pouer Train: 8

C~nt Served: VEST CCM PVHP

Hanufacturer: IHGERSOI.L-RANO CO Hodel: 9000CPH

Panel: I-CCM I-HSOI

E I cm Orauing: 1-98405 Miring Orauing: 1-93011

Pover Source: 1-1'I IA7, 1-HCAB-3

ual tdount F Relay Only: Y

C~nent Type: PVHP

ISO Orauings:

Oetai led Location:

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0)Description: WEST CCW PUMP

Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALL AY,Manufacturer, Model; Etc.: INGERSOLL-RANDCO 9000GPM

SEISMIC CAPACITYYS DEMAND

1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic inputElevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00)

3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 20.00)Capacity based on: 1.00 * Bounding SpectrumDemand based on: 1.00 Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum

609.00YesYes

0.800

c'OCi

0.090

/rr/

/

//r/

0.50 LOG HzCapacity ..... Demand

33.00

CapacityDemand 1

Demand 2

C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.desC:tGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.desCAGIPIPROJ0035tspectra.des

RecordLabel Bounding SpectrumBUILDINGGround(ELEVATIONI608 BROADEN NBUILDINGGround ELEVATION608 BROADEN N

Does capacity exceed demand?

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID:1-PP-10W(Rev. 0)Description: WEST CCW PUMP


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM


HP/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassHP/BS Caveat 2- Driver and Pump on Rigid SkidHP/BS Caveat 3 - Thrust Bearings in Both Axial DirectionsHP/BS Caveat 4 - Check of Long Unsupported PipingHP/BS Caveat 5 - Base Vibration Isolation System Checked.HP/BS Caveat 6 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibilityof Attached Lines.HP/BS Caveat 7 - Adequate Anchorage.HP/BS Caveat 8 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.HP/BS Caveat 9- No Other Concerns.


ANCHORAGE

YesYesYesYesYesYesYesN/AYes




length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concretecracking.

6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/47. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity




INTERACTION EFFECTS

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes*


structures.3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5. No other adverse concerns were found.

YesN/A

YesYesYes


D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev. 0 }Description: WEST CCW PUMP


Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM

IS E UIPME T SEISMIC LLY DE UATE> ~es

CO MEN S

SRT: John D. Stevenson, Paul Wilson, Rick Leonard, and Kaifash Mahajan on 10/5/93.

MFG: INGERSOLL-RAND PUMP, 9000 G.P.M.

Anchorage: 6-3/4" J-Bolts.Total WT=9580 lbs. C.G.=35" above base.

'Minor cracks in non-Struct. pad judged insignificant.

Nozzle loads were applied in the ANCHOR analysis. Nozzle loads were obtained from AEP "SUMMARYOFLOAD ON EQUIPMENT" 11/2/71, Summary of Loads on Pumps for CCW Ã1W PUMP, (microfilm page00100020022) and included deadweight, thermal, thermal anchor movements, and seismic loads.

Ref. Drwgs.: Ingersoll-Rand C-14ALV86X51, W-16ALV500X17, AEPSC 12-3286-9, 12-3073B-2, 12-3073A-3, 12-

~ ~

~

3285-23, Livsey 8 Co. 1-CCW-37, Rev. 5, Sh. 2 of 2.

Picture f/12, Wk1, Tmi, Disk2

Evaluated by:c- /

Date:

Ot

8- ZS- qS

tta nt'i u esachm ' e 0

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal PumpsDescription: WEST CCW PUMPBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model ~ Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM

CTUR S

4 ~

L j

41-PP-10W West CCW Pump-Anchorage

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal PumpsDescription: WEST CCW PUMPBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RANDCO 9000GPM

ANCHOR Report

~Ea h ua e:

Response Spectrum: SSE

Frequency: GIP - Rigid


Spectral Values:





~We'gag

'umberof Weights: 1

No Weight1 9580.00 105.400 20.750 35.000

o ces


No Fx Fy Fz1 2.86E+003 1.24E+003 -3.24E+0032 -2.36E+003 2.24E+003 -4.85E+003

26.87026.870

-5.25047.750

17.00019.000

/~mme

Number of External Moments: 2

No Mx My1 4.88E+004 1.68E+0052 6.32E+004 8.76E+004

3.34E+004-1.60E+004

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W ( Rev. 0 )Description: WEST CCW PUMP

Class: 5. Honzontal Pumps

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model

~ Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM

~llowal>les:

~nor'umber

of Anchor types: 1


InterShearInter Saf

Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact3/4 Other J-Bolt (90

deg) 15030.007510.00 1.00 0.30 1.00

Gmseng




S~ua c~Number of Surfaces: 1

Surface Orientation

No

DirectionComp

Nx0.000

DirectionComp

Ny0.000

DirectionComp

Nz1.000


D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID:1-PP-10W(Rev. 0)Description: WEST CCW PUMP

Class: 5. Honzontal Pumps



Anchor Bolts: ~IIIK'~Concrete Lines: ~[~<nggg

Concrete Points:

Weld Lines

.'~e


AnchId

1 1

2 1

3 1

4 1

5 1

6 1

Coord10.00059.750

109.50010.00059.750

109.500

Coord4.2504.2504.250

37.25037.25037.250

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

SurfId

r in

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-1 OW ( Rev. 0 )Description: WEST CCW PUMP





NoStart

X-Coord8.2508.2508.250

129.000

StartY-Coord

2.6252.625

37.2502.625

StartZ-Coord

0.0000.0000.0000.000

EndX-Coord129.000

8.250129.000129.000

EndY-Coord

2.62537.25037.25037.250

EndZ-Coord

0.0000.0000.0000.000

Sf LineWidth

1.0001.0001.0001.000

r Pin




D ter inati du on a


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (19.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.00 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes




D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 9 of 11

Oa

ID: 1-PP-10W ( Rev. 0 )Description: WEST CCW PUMP


Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Floor El.: 609.00Building: AUXILIARYManufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM


Reduction Factor Input for Anchor f/4


Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 5

I Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (20.00 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.63 in.Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes

Reduction Factor Input for Anchor f/6



AncNo Id

Pall/Vali

5342.332798.39

Pallr/VallrN/AN/A

RT RN1.00 1.001.00 1.00

RL RG0.54 1.001.00 1.00

RS RE1.00 0.651.00 0.37

RF RC1.00 1.001.00 1.00

RR1.001.00

RP RB RM1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev. 0)Description: WEST CCW PUMP



5508,76 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.003741.21 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.005342.33 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.002798.395562.313541.72

NIA 1.00N/A 1.00N/A 1.00

1.001.001.00

1.00 1.000.56 1.001.00 1.00

1.001.001.00

0.37 1.00 1.000.67 1.00 1.000.47 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

1.001.001.00

5586.05 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.003741.21

1 5403.66N/A 1.00NIA 1.00

1.001.00

1.00 1.000.54 1.00

1.001.00

0.50 1.00 1.000.67 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

1.001.00

3347.69 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N/A = Not ApplicablePall = Allowable Pull without Reduced InspectionVali = Allowable Shear without Reduced InspectionPallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced InspectionVallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection

= OutlierX = Reduction Factor Not UsedRT = Reduction Factor for Type of AnchorageRN = Reduction Factor for Installation AdequacyRL = Reduction Factor for EmbedmentRG = Reduction Factor for Gap at AnchorsRS = Reduction Factor for SpacingRE = Reduction Factor for Edge DistanceRF = Reduction Factor for Concrete StrengthRC = Reduction Factor for Concrete CracksRR = Reduction Factor for Essential RelaysRP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying ActionRB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load PathRM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads

al is Re

Is'nalysis

Performed: Yes

Type of Analysis: Regular

Spectral Accelerations (G's)No'-S 0.375

-0.375-0.3750.375

E-W0.150

-0.1500.150

-0.150

Vertical0.100

-0.1000.100

-0.100

Safety Factor3.6804.9484.0024.555

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal PumpsDescription: WEST CCW PUMPBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM

10

121314

15

18192021

222324

0.375-0.3750.375

-0.3750.150

-0.1500.'I50

-0.150-0.1500.1500.150

-0.1500.150

-0.1500.150

-0.150-0.1500.1500.150

-0.150

-0.1500.1500.150

-0.1500.375

-0.375-0.3750.3750.375

-0.3750.375

-0.3750.150

-0.1500.150

-0.1500.150

-0.150-0.1500.150

0.100-0.100-0.1000.1000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.100-0.1000.1000.250

-0.250-0.2500.2500.250

-0.2500.250

-0.250

4 4284.1813.7414.6412.3763.6013.4032.5032.4793.4482.4003.4184.9077.9505.4506.2604.9097.6066.4175.768



**12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHNENT NO . 1

ANCHOR NSPECTXON DATA SHE

.. Unxt Bldg. ZocatzonI- t -

iow'nstalat>.on dwg. / Rev.


X- PP-(ox

Equipment No.

'IO <'- z'l~ "l-3 l~

—0 0 $ ~/~"

~$cP

I

cJ

I

IN

+0I

A0 pk

8

"I-3.VI

INOIANA MICHIGASITE OESIGN CON

WORKING C

jUL 201

RC'Efi

LERKT


Date: t"- /ZV/ ~Z.

Date:Qual. /Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by. Date:.Construction Anc or Review Engineer

Page 1 of 3

Revision 3

~~ Jd ('HJ 502 J ~ CCD. QlgATTACHMENT NO. l

Unit

CHOR NSP CT ON DATA SHE

Bldg.CG RAh

Locat1'on



X- PP-lnvlEqu1pment No.

INOIANA IIICIIIGANP0%'RSITE DESIGN CONTROLLcO

WORKING COPY

JUL 201995

LERK +


Reviewed by:

Date: / zlDate:

Qual. /Cert. Xnspectorr- Date: 1 l I <2

Construct1on chor Rev1ew Engineer

Page 1 of 3Revision

ATTACHMENT NO.

ANCHOR ZNSPECTXON DATA S

O I AUnxt-5 8t'o-'t

Bldg. Locationg- I P- IQWf

Znstallatz.on dwg. / Rev.


Q l)~z-

FLE,U. Ux.ew uonxx.ea ~urn+

INOIANA IAICHIGAN POVIERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

)Ut. 20 $ 9SK

LERK T

Drawn by: Date:Date: +-lF-

Qua ./Cert:. Xn pectorReviewed by: Dat

Construction nchor Review Engineer

Verified by:

1-('i-9 x

Page 1 of 3Revision

J4 QJ4L Vv4 4 ~ QPP gd y.TTACHMZNT Np.

Equipment No.: - PP- 'IO~Anchor type: ~ oi - ~YPE. Z, Dia:Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit"Torque Wrench No.:Tightness verified? 0 Yes

Dwg No .:Dwg No.: l2: 3A3g

0 TorqueCal, Due Date:

0 No Nk'ns ruc Date: — — 2ion

Date:ruc 1 n AREEquipment base flexible? 0 Yes g, No

ons

Bolt IDGaps

Comments

Anchorlen th

Protruding <glen th .~

Embedment

fI v'1" Il fq-

3 ~

Bolt- Pr1

Concretecondition

Edgedistance

- 'In<i" ~ ~

4,~r~'a KDc.E, oeQo<- ~TK'XC.T.

Pac g'lq'A~

Anchors acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

~ ~ I

Z-5q 2:5~( Z.-'3 2- Sg

Q~ Q< Oa OK Q< OgQa g. Qa Q< O< OK

Comments:C s ~ o - S~aucv. P

DR.x,

Verified by:Q a ./Cert. Inspector

Revieved by:Construct1on

IHOIAHA MIC4IGAW POWER

WORKlt(G COPY

JUL 20 1993

Date:

ago 2 of 3e r ion 3

S & A DEPARTMENTCONTROLLED DOCUMENTCopY NO.~ SHP 5050 NDE pp8

ATTACHNEHT NO.


JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: u-aO~i9 REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

Unit On cComponent J - 7'P- )0 0ItemMaterial

Test Unit/ S/N 4Frey./Diameter Jjz.Reference Standard 4 -8Couplant/Batch No. 4 <./

TEST DATA REMARKS

4

wA-'~

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY;

I.EVEE'~IEVEI:~

DATE:

DATE:

FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1Revision 0

Equip Xd: 2-PP-46-4 Train: 1 Equip Class: 5

Drawing No.: 12-5131 12-5131A

tion: RI

Syst: em: BORON MAKEUP (CVCS)

Equip Desc: BORIC ACXD STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP g4

Building: AUXILXARY Room: BORXC ACID STORAGE TANK AREA


Normal State: NR Desired State: R Power Req'd: Y

Support System Drawing: 2-12010 2-98272

Req'd Support Comp: 2-AB-A-1D

Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN

Alias No: Power Train: B

,Comp Served: BAST

MFR: GOULDS PUMPS XNC.

Mo el: 3196

1: 2-BA 2-HSD2

Elem. Drawing: 2-98272


Power Source: 2-AB-A-1D

Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y

Comp Type: PUMP

Iso Drawing: 0-DR-724

'ocation: XN THE MXDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET'OUTHEASTOF MXDDLE BORIC ACXD STORAGE TANK

512-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR

D.C. COOK Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)

GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 1 of4

ID: 2-PP-46-4 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC. 3196


1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input

Description: BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP f/4Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACIDSTOR TANKAREA - IN THEMIDDLEEAST REGION OF THEROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OFMIDDLEBORIC ACID STORAGETANKIt/12-TK-12M, NEAR THEFLOOR

587.00Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00)

3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 20.00)Capacity based on: 1.50 " Bounding Spectrum

5. Demand based on: 1.00 Realistic Median-Centered Floor Response Spectra

N/AN/A

1.200

LOG

: 0.080

lI

\I\

III

I

II

j/I

r~

0.50 LOG HzCapacity ..... Demand

50.00

CapacitDemand 1

Demand 2

FileC:tGIP>GIP'Lspectra.desC:tGIPIPROJ0034tspectra.desC:tGIPIPROJ0034'Lspectra.des

RecordLabel(Bounding SpectrumBUILDINGAuxilia IELEVATION587IBROADEN(NBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION587 BROADENIN







Description: BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP &Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACIDSTOR TANKAREA - IN THEMIDDLEEAST REGION OF THEROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OFMIDDLEBORIC ACID STORAGETANK012-TK-12M, NEAR THEFLOOR


HP/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassHP/BS Caveat 2- Driver and Pump on Rigid Skid.HP/BS Caveat 3 - Thrust Bearings in Both Axial DirectionsHP/BS Caveat 4 - Check of Long Unsupported Piping.HP/BS Caveat 5 - Base Vibration Isolation System CheckedHP/BS Caveat 6 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibilityof Attached Lines.HP/BS Caveat 7 - Adequate Anchorage.HP/BS Caveat 8 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.HP/BS Caveat 9 - No Other Concerns.

YesYesYesYesYesYesYesN/AYes

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum7

ANCHORAGE







considered.9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate10. The adequacy of embedded steel ~ grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.


YesYes

YesYes

Yes.

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes






Description: BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP I/4Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACIDSTOR TANKAREA - IN THEMIDDLEEAST REGION OF THEROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OFMIDDLEBORIC ACID STORAGETANK012-TK-12M, NEAR THEFLOOR

INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targ'ets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or


YesNIA

YesYesYes

ls equipment free of interaction effects?

IS E U P ENTSEISIVIICA Y D U T ~Ys

COMMEN S

SRT: John D. Stevenson, Paul Wilson, Rick Leonard, and kailash Mahajan on 10/05/93.

GOULDS PUMP.Anchorage Four 5/8" diameter Ram anchor expansion bolts.Pump WT 511lbs, C.G=12 3/8" above base.

The 5/8" diameter expansion anchors have 4" embedment into the base concrete below the 8" pad, per theanchorage inspection.This judged adequate by the SRT for the light (511 (bs) pump.Attached piping is 2" or less. Nozzle toads judged not to be a problem by the SRT.

Picture 0 49, Wk1, Tm1, Disk1.

Evaluated by: Date:

achm t: Pictures



ID: 2-PP-46-4 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal PumpsDescription: BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP N4

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACIDSTOR TANKAREA - IN THFMIDDLEEAST REGION OF THEROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OFMIDDLEBORIC ACID STORAGETANKf/12-TK-12M, NEAR THEFLOOR


ICTUR S

Boric Acid Storage Tank Transfer Pump 2-PP-46A-~ Anchors

Coo

Component No. Claaa

Any payticular prea the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attention totYam ~ No W (If yea, check items that apply. )

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor EmbedmentAnchor Edge DistanceAnchor GapAnchor Thread~EngagementAnchor Grip

v'nchorAngularityConcrete Crack

Others (describe briefly}

If there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicableitem and explain.

1.2.3.

Hardvare Maintenance Type DiscrepancyDrawing Up&,te Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Doaign Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:l4- 33-

Actions Taken:

PreI ared By T Data

*(* '. CHP 5021.CCD.019ZTACHMENT NO. 1

Unxt

NCHOR NS ECTION DATA SH E

Bl g.l TO A I= %ASK A,Re.I'-.Location



M5QLATiCIA

OlI l

( AP)Chorq CcO!l

(ARE Z~«~fyZ V)IR:P.

II

I1

I l

gI

lOl

',O'- ',OI

All /IJ/C.IIORq+g Pf

/»'o"

/-'8Ã"

PL%,M VIKVf

r ~I J

PLA-rE >g pPz x pP~ ~~

INQIANA hIICHIGhN POwFRSITE DESIGN CONTRQI.LEO

WORKING COPY

JUL t Z t995

I.ERK T


Date:Date:

Qua ./Cert. Inspector~ ~

Reviewed by: 7'ate:Construction An hor Revs,ew Engineer


~ ~ l

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

r~ %~1

~ II o

s ~

~ ~

R%WWK~%WW&&C4541%1LHLLKlSSWL1%%L~LISWLRSL5%5%WKRILSLmmWSLLXLL~HRRKR'%%saaslmMMM&i&

5%L%SKRRLRI r 4 a r i k

JSC~r

i ~

-pp

'> T]ig,lgl (

("~ i'!":iROLl.E%DOCui4&4T

2 SHP 50SO NDE.008ATTACHMENT NO. 1

UK TRASON IC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO.: REQUEST NO. /A

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponent

ItemMaterialOther 5

P.sTest, Unit/ S/NFreq./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.g l4

DS /

TEST DATA REMARKS

nc r

PERFORMED BX:

REUIEMED BY:

FORM NO. 12 SHP SOSO NDE.008-1 Page 1 ofRevision 0

:~Z- '3

Database: K:SSEL1B.DBF

Equip XD: 1-HV-AFP-M1 Train: 2 Equip Class:9

ing No.: 12-5148B

ction: HVAC

System: TURBXNE BUXLDXNG VENTXLATION

Equip Desc:. EAST MOTOR DRXV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN

Building: TURBXNE Room: EAST MOTOR DRIV. AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM


Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y


Req'd Support Comp: 1-AB-D-R2D

Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt:MIN'lias

No: Power Train: A

Comp Served: EAST MOTOR DRXV AUX FEED PUMP

MFR:

1: 10000 FT 3/MIN

Panel:



Power Source: 1-AB-D-R2D

Walkdown: F Relay Eval

Comp Type: VENT FAN

Y

Xso Drawing:

Location: XN THE SW CORNER OF THE ROOM, 10'W OF EAST MDAFWP, ONTHE WEST WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLOOR.

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet1 of3

ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 9. FansDescription: EAST MOTOR DRIVAUXFEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FANBuilding: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV

AUXFDWTR PUMP RM, IN THESW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'WOF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL,12'BOVE THE FLR.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURINGCO. ~ 10000 FT"3/MIN


Elevation where equipment receives seismic input2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00)

Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 10.00)4. Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum5. Demand based on: 1.00 " Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum

591.00YesYes

0.000

LOG

0.090

/r

rr

0.50 LOG Hz

Capacity ..... Demand33.00,

CapacitDemand 1

Demand 2

FileC:tGIPtGIPtspectra.desC:LGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.desCAGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des

RecordLabel Bounding SpectrumBUILDINGGround ELEVATION608 BROADEN NBUILDINGGround ELEVATIONI608BROADEN N


D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 9. FansDescription: EAST MOTOR DRIVAUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FANBuilding: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV


Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURINGCO., 10000 FT"3/MIN


FAN/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassFAN/BS Caveat 2 - Drive Motor and Fan Mounted on Common Base.FAN/BS Caveat 3 - Long Shafts Supported at Fan and at Motor.FAN/BS Caveat 4 - No Possibility of Excessive Duct Distortion Causing Binding or Misalignment

of Fan.FAN/BS Caveat 5 - Base Vibration Isolation System CheckedFAN/BS Caveat 6 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibilityof Attached Lines.FAN/BS Caveat 7 - Adequate Anchorage.FAN/BS Caveat 8 - No Other Concerns

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum7

ANCHORAGE

YesYesYesYes

N/AYesYesYes





6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the. base are less than 1/47. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity




YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 9. FansDescription: EAST MOTOR DRIVAUXFEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FANBuilding: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV


Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURINGCO., 10000 FT"3/MIN

INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures2. Ifthe equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or


Is equipment free of interaction effects'P

YesNIA

YesYesYes

S U

~CIELIRXR

SRT: Gary Thomas, Gunnar Harstead and Harry Young on 10/20/93.

Anchorage: .

Fan mounted to embedded plate structure with at least 16 steel to steel bolts at least 1/2" in diameter.

Weight of fan 500 lbs.

No anchorage calculation required for a fan of this size with this robust anchorage. Therefore anchorage is OKbased on SRT judgement and inspection.

Interaction:Insulated pipe running outside the room the fan services could impact the outside screen of the fan. Pipe wellinsulated and willcushion the impact, therefore the SRT judged this as non4amaging.

Photo: Fan mounted outside the room with the damper on the inside, therefore could not get a good picture of fan.

Evaluated by: Date:

2 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO

Unct Ii 2.-5(:8

Xnstallatxon dwg. / Rev.


ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEETTuRsit4P. OI4VW /gal Pq<~'T ~~a,l 2 h&ogC R.oatFCMg v)ATCR. Paine poenh SauTuMCsT c~IM

Bldg. Locationi- t<-V- hFP-Mi

Equipment No.

Dla4~ON'5'p

( g FP-Old7 QSuP PO T~.

Drawn by: Date: ~'- 8-~1~

Verified by:

Reviewed by

Hh Date:Qual. /Cert. Xnspector

Anal~ Date:Construction Anchor Review Engineer).- <) -~( 3


Database: K:SSEL1B.DBF

Eguip ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Train: 2 Equip Class:9

wing No.: 12-5148B

ction: HVAC

System: SCREENHOUSE VENTXLATXON

Equip Desc: UNIT Q1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTXLATION FAN

Building: SCREENHOUSE Room: EAST ESW PUMP ROOM




Req'd Support Comp: 1-PS-D-2B

Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN

Alias No: Power Train: A

Comp Served: EAST ESW PUMP

MFR: BUFFALO FORGE CO

l: 5000 FT"3/MIN

Panel:

Elem. Drawing: 1-98415 1-98721


Power Source: 1-PS-D-2B

Walkdown: F Relay Eval : Y

Comp Type: VENT FAN

Xso Drawing:

Location: IN THE SW CORNER OF THE ROOM, 15'E OF EAST ESW PP,13'BOVETHE FLOOR.

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)'IP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92

Status: YesSheet1 of11

ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT41 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'SE OF E ESWPP,

13'BOVETHE FLR.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN


1. Elevation where e ui ment receives seismic in utElevation of seismic in ut below about 40'rom rade rade = 608.00

3. E ui menthasfundamentalfre uenc aboveabout8Hz est.fre uenc =10.00Ca acit based on: 1.50'Boundin S ectrumDemand based on: 1.00 * Realistic Median-Centered Floor Res onse S ectra

587.00N/AN/A

1.200

LOG

0.0800.50

l'

\\\

I

\I

I

rjr

LOG Hz


50.00

Ca aciDemand 1

Demand 2

FileC:tGIP<GIPIs ra.desC:(GIPIPROJ0035ls .desC:(GIPPROJ003Qs lra.des

RecordLabel Boundin S trumBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION587 BROADEN NBUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION587 BROADEN N

Does capacity exceed demand? Yes

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNITN EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP,



FAN/BS Caveat 1- Earth uake Ex erience E ui ment ClassFAN/BS Caveat 2- Drive Motor and Fan Mounted on Common Base.FAN/BS Caveat 3- Lon Shafts Su orted at Fan and at Motor.FAN/BS Caveat 4- No Possibility of Excessive Duct Distortion Causing Binding or

Misali nment of Fan.FAN/BS Caveat 5- Base Vibration Isolation S stem CheckedFAN/BS Caveat 6- Sufficient Slack and Flexibilit of Attached Lines.FAN/BS Caveat 7 - Ade uate Anchora e.FAN/BS Caveat 8- No Other Concerns

YesYesYesYes

N/AYesYesYes

ts the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'

ANCHORAGE


dam in, center of rotation .

3. The t e of anchora e is covered b the GIP.4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length,

nuts and washers, ex ansion anchor ti htness, etc.5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, andconcrete crackin .

6. For bolted anchora es, an a s under the base are less than 1/47. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity

reduction for ex ansion anchors.8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been

considered.9. Thestren th of thee ui mentbaseand the load athto the CG isade uate.10. The ade uac of embedded steel, rout ads or la e concrete ads have been evaluated.11. The anchora e ca acit exceeds the demand.

Are anchorage requirements met7

INTERACTION EFFECTS

Yes

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes

Yes

1. Soft tar ets are free from im act b nearb e ui mentorstructures.2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or

structures.3. Attached lines have ade uate flexibilit .

4. Overhead e ui ment or distribution s stems are not likel to colla se.5. No other adverse concerns were found.

YesN/A

YesYesYes

ls equipment free of interaction effects? Yes

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALLIATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 3 of 11

ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'E OF E ESW PP,


IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLYADEQUATE'P Yes

COMMENTS

SRT: Gary Thomas, Gunnar Harstead and Harry Young on 10/19/93.

Capacity vs Demand:Component is in Screenhouse building using Auxiliary building Response Spectra for calculation

Anchorage:Fan sits on steel platform, bolted to the wall on two sides with 2- 3/4" through bolts on each side, and hung atopposite corner by a 4x4x3/8" angle.

Calculation should be rerun. This fan is the limiting analysis fo 12-HV-ESW-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,&8

Anchorage is adequate. The calculated anchorage safety factor is 32.8.

~ ~Photo: Wk. 2, Tm. 2, Disk 1, Picture 29 Fan; 30 Underside of frame showing two bolts to wall; 31 Top of anglehanger support for platform.

Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: ANCHOR Re ort

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVAI UATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92Status: YesSheet 4 of 11

ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNITP1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN

1 Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMPRM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'E OF E ESW PP,


PICTURES

Figure 1: Fan 12-HV-ESW-7 Figure 2: Underside of frame showing two bolts towall

Figure 3: Top of angle hanger support for platform

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans

Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMPRM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP,

13'BOVETHE FLR.

F,loor El.: 591.00Building: SCREENHOUSE

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN

ANCHOR Report

Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN

Response Spectrum: SSE

Frequency: GIP - Flexible


Spectral Values:


Acceleration 's

0.600.600.25



~Wei htn:

Number of Weights: 1

No Wei ht1 500.00 35.000 23.000 18.000

Forces:


Moments:


Allowables:

Anchor:

Number of Anchor types: 1

Tension Shear

Coeff FactShearProductDiaUltimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf

No. Manufact Tension Coeff

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'EOF E ESW PP,


1 3/4 Other Grouted In 1500.00 7510.00 1.00Place

0.30 1.00

Concrete:



Weld:


Surfaces:

Number of Surfaces: 2Surface Orientation

DirectionCom

No0.0001.000

DirectionCom

N1.0000.'000

DirectionCom

Nz0.0000.000


Anchor Pattern for Surface //2

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP




Anchor Bolts:

Concrete Uncs: ~mmConcrete Points:

Weld Uncs:

Geometrei:

Anchor:


Anch SurfNo. Id

1

2 1

34 1

Coord16.10052.60070.00070.000

Coord46.00046.00041.3004.800

Coord4.0004.0004.0004.000

Id

Concrete Lines:

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591:00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'EOF E ESW PP,




Nostart

X-Coo rd0.000

70.000

startY-Coord

46.0000.000

startZ-Coo rd

4.0004.000

EndX-Coord

70.00070.000

EndY-Coord

46.00046.000

EndZ-Coord Id

4.000 1

4.000 2

LineWidth

3.0003.000

Concrete Points:


Weld Lines:



Determination of Reduction Factors:

Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹1

Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: ( 7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: ( 7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.06 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: Yes

D.C. COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT f/1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP



Embedment Length: ( 7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.13 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes

Reduction Factor input for Anchor 0 4

Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment I.ength: (7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.13 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


NoAnc Pall/

Vali1500.007510.001500.007510.001500.007510.00

Pallr/Vallr RT RN

NIAN/A

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

NIA 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00

N/A 1.00 1.00N/A 'l.oo 1.00

RL RG1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

RS RE1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

RF RC1.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

RR RP RB1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

RM

1 1500.00?510.00

NIA 1.00 1.00NIA 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1,00

~Le eed:

N/A = Not A licablePall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Ins ectionVail = Allowable Shear without Reduced Ins ectionPallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Ins ectionVallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Ins ection


RT = Reduction Factor for T e of Anchora eRN = Reduction Factor for Installation Ade uacRL = Reduction Factor for Embedment

= Reduction Factor for S acinRSRG = Reduction Factor for Ga at Anchors

D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNITN EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP,


RFRCRRRPRB

= Reduction Factor for Ed e Distance= Reduction Factor for Concrete Stren th= Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks= Reduction Factor for Essential Reta s= Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and P in Action= Reduction Factor for Base Stren th and Load Path= Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads

Anal sis Results:



S ectral Accelerations G's

No

10

1213141516

18't92021

N-S0.600

-0.600-0.6000.6000.600

-0.6000.600

-0.6000.240

-0.2400.240

-0.240-0.2400.2400.240

-0.2400.240

-0.2400.240

-0.240-0.240

E-W0.240

-0.2400.240

-0.240-0.2400.2400.240

-0.2400.600

-0.600-0.6000.6000.600

-0.6000.600

-0.6000.240

-0.2400.240

-0.2400.240

Vertical0.100

-0.1000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.100-0.1000.1000.100

-0.'I 000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.100-0.'I000.1000.250

-0.250-0.2500.2500.250

Safet Factor44.55359.94877.05450.89748.71659.56549.641

106.18431.79653.06891.15132.44433.58556.10333.32187.64856.45359.642/6.162

205.01567.138

22 ~ 0.2400.240

-0.240-0.240

-0.2500.250

67.33376.365

24 -0.240 0.240 -0.250 59.986


D.C. COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. FansDescri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFANBuilding: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP

RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THERM, 15'SEOF E ESW PP,



Coo

Component No. I'Z"& G~+- 1 Cla»a

Any particular prea the Seismic Review Team»hould pay extra attontion to7Yes No v'Lfye», check item» that apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor EmbedmentAnchor Edge DistanceAnchor CapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor CripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack

Other» (describe brief].y)

If thereitem and

l.2.3.

i» concern. for Desi.gn Basis Discrepancy, circle tho applicableexplain.

Hardvare Maintenance Type DiscrepancyDrawing Update Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Do»ign Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condi tion:

Actions Taken:

Prepared By ~'aca ~5>'" 3

*c' CHP @021. CCD. 019. ZTACHNENT NO. 1

O(vUnxt



NCHOR XNSPECTION DATA SHEE

E. M ea 4o~Bldg. Location

iZ- 9-ES -7Equipment No.

rAu &r I (OIAi~A MlCHIQAy POWERSITE i)ES I'H CO ITROLLEO

WORKIIIQ COPY

JUL >S tsSS

«RZ l.

DETAIL A DETAIL(I

0(0

CoHPon(EQ r I 8 I'-ITTAC'AGOT(o /V Cu~l QZ'Q 'P IATE

a~ (~) zz"p5

~-as'~+~1rI

cj(((I((VB AprlrI,E

I

IIF-(I(Il~

3-P

8 eche ~4AL~/A" B.<T't~f(pf,Q oP Top

/)~i(Joo o

Drawn by:Verified b Date:

Qual. /Cert. XnspectorReviewed by: pate. F-RI- t 3

Construction An hor Review Engineer


**l2CHP 5021.CCD.019I 'TACHMENT NO. 1

Unzt

Xnstallatz.on dwg. / Rev.


NCHOR INSPECTXON DATA SHEET

c.Yc.t Quod 0 ~ E U 7 oow~ Bldg. Location

IZ,- Av- F>g-7Equipment No.

\

Ow

~I

II

I

I

I'I

I-~+/6 f 'THRV Cbo'ErbI. 7YP. Z

lo Yig

EL'E.V lEw'w Meir

I IOIANA h'ICHIGAIJ POP,'/IISl fF. OCSIGH CONTROLLED

YIORKIIIG COPY

JUL tg19SS

. LCRK~

Drawn by:Verified b

Date: Y /2 q

Date: 'PDQual. /Cert. Inspector

~

~~

~ ~

Reviewed by: T Date: ~ <'-'I~Construct>on A chor Review Engineer


i~2 CHP 5021 - CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Unct

bNcHQR

Bldg.

NSPECTION DATA SHEET

E Few Q~Locatzo



Equipment No.

Top Wgosps ipcPbi77u~ IV'2Z

I 'I~

I—4/iS'I

I

)—4/iy

I

I~ 4'ibI

WwACcc:ssibt 8

Pi@ ~ TOP Mc)xwsoC vc

Q II1vg

0 M

Vd

Z"

5/

POp Wc v

~S<QQ MibBO77~ +i@

I/u" PLtI Y-e i S S Ti Y'CSWE't DED YO

Tnt')'Lr

rv >c L.

Sc CHANNEL IS bta'vT87'FNos AnlQ

HEEDED VOLrt-TI cr»

fi 7I 7 7<. L»" 7c"

TOP Qi~ZJlMg VVlb''vt48~

IttDIANA MICiIIGQN PPWt RSITC PESld't( CONTROLLt.J

WORKING COPY

f UL 1g tSSS

~ pRg T~E'WPD

n'rawn

by: Date:

~

~

~ ~

Verified byQual. /Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: T, Date:Construct>.on A chor Review Engineer

') "2.I- Qg

Page 1 of 3

Revision 1

*" 2 CHP 5021- CCD ~ 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

.Unxt

NC OR INSPECTIO D TA S E

C/8 N uSEBldg.

F.. FSM R> iP oeLocation

4 -7Installation dwg. / Rev.


C.0

gA" /Z. /Q" /g "

O>Oy ECT VIe& AA

0'5'~ '~ '+,>,~C, o tQg+>',:< -',~l8"+: ~ W.A ~ %~XI'>"5'I (rd S '4~ ~ )'>-4 <J~ -56

AntCho<s A, d,c,iOAPF. Y~"P mJ

HAVE &ashore.

I8 Q,. 0

IZ'2" l2 Fi(." II Pa

cT is& P

INOIRIIAVICMIGA>I POWERSITE OESlut< CONTfiOLLEO

WORKING COPY

lUL 1519S5

LCRK

Drawn by: Date:

Qual. /Cert. InspectorReviewed by: Date:



~ ~ ~

e ~ ~ a

- ~ ~ ~ ~

~ 9 ~

~ ~ e s ~

~ ~ ~

o 14

V

t

5%RRSRSHKLPMWWMMM&WR%1%RRRRSLMMWMMMW&RSRSSWRHLL555%655%%LLR5%%%5%%88~~~~5555WRIHHSE54WWHRRSRI

%8%Ã%R4%~~M5%K'WWMMMWW

Pt 4 P C.

44

c

'12 CHP 5021. CCD. 03.9ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Equipment No.: IZ- AV'-

Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Dwg No.': Iz.-$4 82-7

Weld IDT e

SizeLen thCracks

/ 3/

Yes57@

YesdRP

Yes Yes

~i M~ w'~ w/ /

YescHZP

YesQRD

~/i<"

/ '/y"

Y s


Lack ofPenetration

Ye's Yes Yes Yes@HE

Yesc85 +Ys Yes

429Yes

CPS

Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YescHZP . 895

Yes<HE

lhQIAt(A te1ICH~GA I POII~RSlTE OrS|GH CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

JUL t~199~

LrPg T ~ CA

Equipment base flexible: G Yes 8 No

Reviewed by:ons ruc on re

ns ruc 1on c or ev1ew ng1neer~

~ ~

verified by:ua . er . npsec or

Date:

Date:

g-Ah- 93


(12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

ANCHOR TNSPECTXON DATA SHEET

quipment No.: l~-/-rV'- E'SVEmbedded Steel Dwg. No.: h


Dwg No.: t+-W 4BZ.-7

Weld XD

T e

SizeLen thCracks


'lie.

Yes

Yes

Yes

w'io

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Yes4lZP

Yes'RAN

Qes

YesCfB

YesCh

YesKDYes

Weld T e Codes

1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 = Groove

liVOIANA h".CH IGnN PO)".ERSITE OFSICH

COlITROaa.EL'CRNlIt(C

CCRC'UI.

>g]995

-tres T ~~Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5 No T

Reviewed by:ons ruc 1o re Date: 0- >>- 'l'3

Date: b-2,(- f2

Verified by:~ ~

ons ruc 1on nc or ev1ew ng1neer

ua . er . npsec or Date:


C'2 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO- 1


quipment No.: / Z —

A'mbeddedSteel Dwg. No.: ghPHYSlCAL CHARACTERISTICS

Dwg No..'Z-WC SZ-~

Weld XD

T e

SizeLen thCracks


Yes

Yes

Yes

ges

3"

Yes

@Ys

YesCb

3/

s0

Yes s

Yes

s0

3/

Yes0

s Yes


INDI/(JA >.',~Q<ICAN PP;ygIISITC O~SlCN CONT(IDLI.ED

YYDIIKIIICCQP'f

lUL ~q 199"

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5 Noon ruc x n re Date '2I

Reviewed by:

V rified by:on ruc >on nc o

ua . er . npsec or

evxew ngxneerDate:


12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


quipment No.: 2- — Sld- 7

Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: g-3L8~PHYSXCAL CHARACTERXSTXCS

Dwg No.: Z-W Z-7

Held XD

T e

4JZ IJ~L 4AV Weld T e Codes1 = Fillet

SizeLen thCracks


Yes

YeskS'es855

Yes

YesB5

Yes

YesQRI

Yesc55'es

Yes

Yescd&

7'Fq

YescRED

Yesdrab

YesCKb

Yes

es

Yes

Yes Yesmz . Hh

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

2 = Plug/Slot3 = Groove

QEhlOTES An/ XII $ 4O~AJW uJEL A.

INOIANA tIICHIGAN POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

JUL >~ 1995

.LEAK 7

Eguipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8-No

Reviewed by:ons uc zo re

Date:ons ruc son or evzew ngxneer

Verified by:ua . er . npsec or Date: Y-<-9'3


S 8 .A.DEPARTMENTCONTPOLLED DOCUtvlciNTCOPY NO. 3 -l

SHP 5050 NDE.008ATTACHMENT NO. 1


JOB ORDER NO.: /8 REPORT DATE: 4-/- '73 REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponentItem n /iMaterial /<Other 5

-FS i~~ "Test Unit/ S/N > (wS'r.'- 5'2F- P~

Freq./Diameter 7 zsZ~

Reference Standard C- ~ PCouplant/Batch No. '=. c/ ~7aZ

TEST DATA REMARKS

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


: ~3LEVEL:~ DATE: ~ ///+


Equip XD: 1-AFW Train: 2 Equip Class: 14

Drawing No.: 1-12035

sction: 120 VAC SYSTEM

stem: 120/208V MISC. SAFTEY RELATED POWER DXSTRIBUTXONJ

Equip Desc: POWER PANEL

Building: AUXILIARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DXESEL GENERATOR ROOM

Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes:

,Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd:

Support System Drawing:

Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR


Comp Served:

Mfr: POWER ELECTRIC INC.

Model:

Min/Opt: MIN

E em. Drawing: 1-98215


Power Source: 1-ABD-C-2A

Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N

Comp Type: DISTRIBUTXON PANEL

XSO Drawing:

Location: 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORgl-OME-150-CD( ON THE NORTH WALL

DC Cook Unit1SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)

GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92Status: YesSheet 1 of 3

ID: 1-AFW ( Rev. 0 )Description: POWER PANELBuilding: AUXILIARY

Class: 14. Distribution Panels

F(oor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL GENERATOR C1-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.


Elevation where equipment receives seismic inputFlevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = )

Capacity based on: 1.00 'ounding SpectrumDemand based on: 1.00 * Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum

587.00YesSRT

0.000

LOG

r

/////

/

//

0 0900.50 LOG Hz


33.00

CapacityDemand 1

Demand 2

FileC:tGIPtGIPtspectra.desC:LGIPIPROJ0031tspectra.desC:tGIPtPROJ0031tspectra.des

RecordLabel Bounding SpectrumBUILDINGGroundlELEVATION 608 BROADEN NBUILDINGGround(ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N


DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-AFW ( Rev. 0 )

Description: POWER PANELBuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL GENERATOR f/1-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL



DP/BS Caveat I - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassDP/BS Caveat 2 - Contains only Circuit Breakers and SwitchesDP/BS Caveat 3 - Doors Secured.DP/BS Caveat 4 - Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together.DP/BS Caveat 5 - General Configuration Similar to NEMAStandards.DP/BS Caveat 6 - Adequate AnchorageDP/BS Caveat 7 - Potential Chatter of Essential Rela s Evaluated.DP/BS Caveat 8 - No Other Concerns.

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'7

YesYesYesN/AYesYesN/AYes

ANCHORAGE





6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 .

7. Factors affecting essential relays have been'considered: gaps under the base, capacityreduction for expansion anchors.

8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has beenconsidered.

9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesN/AYes


DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-AFW( Rev. 0)Description: POWER PANEL


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL GENERATOR 81-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL


INTERACTION EFFECTS




YesN/A

YesYesYes

S'E I NT ES C L Y DE U E

SRT: George Gary Thomas (S&A) and Tom Huang (AEP) on 10/7/1993

Ref. 1: Anchor Inspection Data Sheet: Anchorage Arrangement Sheet, 1/21/93.Ref. 2: Dwg 0 1-12035-12 (internal components dwg).

Capacity:BSCav.2: Verified by walkdown and Ref. 2.

Anchorage:Wall mounted panel with dimensions: 36"Hx20''Wx6"Deep. Anchorage was not accessible.

Panel estimated to weigh less than 50 lbs. Tug tested by G. Thomas to at least 100 Ibs, OK; therefore, no explicitanchorage evaluation necessary.

Evaluated by: Date:

(12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACENENT NO. 1


COE E gg I,

Un>.t Bldg. Location



PHOO uuislr«k1-'8" C~lr ( YI'I'.)

t-a"

r&AQUI!M )qua%

lo un,pl~

CASa)~) I'-8wZ-II8! «5 /8

~ ~

lI

8

lvI

(~)

5Ctcwg ~/~ssl cps LJII tC H

Cd/AEc.f. un:sic«I, H ufo'A.

(9'rP)II'IDIMIt,'!CHICA,I~W~IIGITE DESIGII COIITIIOU.'60

VFORXING COPY

APH 0 8 tS93

..I.EAK

Drawn by:verified by-

Reviewed b

7-Date:

1- ~I-'l3ual./ ert. nspector

Date:Construction A chor Review Engineer


g

~-

eemseaarxRRRRRSRSHHELRSRSRRRRMML&WRRRSHHHRLQSSISLRLSHRRRRRRLLLLMWWWWW&WRWRlWRHSLW558WRLELMWWWWMW&

I

k i

0 f

~J4>

~ ~

Database: K:SSEL2C.DBF

Equip ID: 2-BATT-AB Train: 1 Equip Class:15

ywing No.: 2-12003

nction: 250 VDC SYSTEM

System: 250VDC DISTRXBUTXON

Equip Desc: PLANT BATTERY AB

Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB BATTERY EQUIPMENT AREA



Support System Drawing: 2-98055, 2-12003

Req'd Support Comp:


Alias No: Power Train: B

Comp Served:

MFR: C 6 D BATTERIES

l: LC-25

Panel: 2-BC-AB


Wiring Drawing: 2-91012, 2-91301

Power Source: 2-TDAB-5

Walkdown: C Relay Eval : Y

Comp Type: BATTERY, *RHR WALKDOWN COMPONENT

Iso. Drawing:

Location: IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCEDOOR

D. C. Cook Unit 2Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)

GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2114/92Status: NoSheet 1 of 6

ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0) Class: 15. Batteries on RacksDescription: PLANT BATTERYABBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AS BATTERY

EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTEROF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTHOF THE ENTRANCE DOOR

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CBD Power Systems LC-25 Cells



3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 8.00)Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum

5. Demand based on: 1.00 " Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum

609.00YesSRT

0.850

LIN Irr ~ 1

rr

er

~ t

0.0001.00 LOG Hz

Capacity ~.... Demand

33.00

CapacttDemand 1

Demand 2

HAGIPtGIPtspectra.desH:tGIPtPROJOOSStspectra.desH:tGIPV'ROJ0058tspectra.des

RecordLabel Bounding SpectrumBUILDINGGround Spectrum ELEVATION BROADENBUILDINGGround Spectrum ELEVATION BROADEN



GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: NoSheet 2 of 6

ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0)Description: PLANT BATTERYABBuilding: AUXILIARY

Class: 15. Batteries on Racks

Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AG BATTERYEQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTEROF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTHOF THE ENTRANCE DOOR

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CSD Power Systems LC-25 Cells


BAT/BS Caveat I - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassBAT/BS Caveat 2 - Battery Cell Plates are Lead-Calcium Flat-Plate, Plante, or Manchex

Design.BAT/BS Caveat 3- Each Individual Battery Weighs Less Than 450 Pounds.BAT/BS Caveat 4- Close-Fitting Spacers between Cells..BAT/BS Caveat 5- Batteries Restrained by Side and End RailsBAT/BS Caveat 6 - Battery Racks Have Longitudinal Cross Bracing.BAT/BS Caveat 7- Racks Constructed of Wood Evaluated.BAT/BS Caveat 8 - Batteries Greater Than 10 Years Old Evaluated.BAT/BS Caveat 9 - Adequate AnchorageBAT/BS Caveat 10 - No Other Concerns.


YesYes

YesYesYesYesN/A

YesYes

ANCHORAGE









YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesN/AYes



ID: 2-BATT-AB( Rev. 0)Description: PLANT BATTERYAB


Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATIERYEQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTEROF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTHOF THE ENTRANCE DOOR

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C&D Power Systems LC-25 Cells

INTERACTION EFFECTS




YesN/A

YesYesYes

S IC LLY D U

~CON I~EN

Date: 10/18/93

SRT: Tom Huang (AEP), Steve Anagnostis (S&A), Paul Krugh (AEP), Randy Steele (AEP)

References:1. Cook Dwgs 12-3476-18, 12-3073A-3, 12-3073D2. C&D Power Systems Inc Dwgs K-5629-3, M-8654-C, M-8655-C, M-8665-D3. Anchorage Package

Four substantial welded steel 2-step battery racks well braced in both directions. Two racks house 28 cells each,and two racks house 30 cells each. Each cell is a C&D Power Systems LC-25. The cells are well secured. Eachrack is anchored with twelve (12) 3/8" anchors.- see references for details.

Frequency > 8 Hz by inspection.

BS Caveat 2: Batteries are C&D lead calcium flat plate (per label on battery).BS Caveat 3: Each cell weighs 325 Ibs (Reference 2)BS Caveat 8: Batteries were installed in 1985. SQUG Action Item 002 was written to address the aging issue.

ANCH Caveat 1: The anchorage package specifies the anchors as unknown 3/8" non-shell type expansionanchors. The original plant drawings (Ref 1) specify 3/8" J-bolts (90 degrees, 9", embedment), but when the currentbattery rack was replaced in 1985, a note was added to the plant drawing that, where necessary due to bolt holemisalignment in the rack, the original J bolts were to be cut off and replaced with 3/8" Kwikbolts. The current boltsare exactly where the original plant drawings locate the J bolts, and they look like J-bolts (cut-off threaded end).

ANCH Caveat 2: Per Ref 2, the 28 cell racks weigh 10231 Ibs and the 30 cell racks weigh 10920 lbs. The cellsare about 90% of the weight and the rack is about 10% of the weight. The attached "Battery Rack WeightDistribution" shows the geometry.

ANCH Caveat 4, 6: Installation checked per Ref 3.



ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0 )Description: PLANT BATTERYABBuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERYEQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTEROF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTHOF THE ENTRANCE DOOR

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells

ANCH Caveat 5: In the SRT's judgement, the anchors are the original J bolts. Per GIP Table C.4-1, these havenominal capacities of 3.74k pullout and and 1.87 kip shear. The pullout capacity is reduced by 0.51 to 1.91 kipsdue to the 9" embedment length. No other reductions are required.

Note that ifthe anchors were 3/8" Kwikbolts (the replacements specified in Ref 1), the nominal capacities wouldbe 1 46 k pullout and 1.42 kip shear. The pullout capacity would be reduced by 0.88 to 1.28 kips due to 3.5 ksiconcrete. No other reductions would be required."

ANCH Caveat 8: The racks are anchored through a pair of 3/4" thick plates that run along the front and back ofthe racks (see references and photos). This configuration may produce some prying on the anchors; although theplate may be stiffenough relative to the anchors to keep this to a minimum. Per the discussion for ANCH Caveat11, the pullout load would have to increase by a factor of 6.2 for J-bolts (3.6 for Kwik,bolts) to reach the allowablelimits.

ANCH Caveat 11: The attached "Battery Rack Weight Distribution" shows that the front-to-back overturningmoment for one rack is 55648 in-lbs. That moment is resisted by six anchors with a moment arm of 30", whichproduces a per bolt pullout load of 55648/6/30 = 309 lbs. The side-to-side seismic loads willnot produce anysignificant pullout loads. The shear load is 4586 Ibs for one horizontal direction of input. SRSS'ing the twohorizontal directions and dividing by the number of bolts produces a per bolt shear load of 1.41 x 4586/12 = 539lbs.

Using the bi-linear shear-tension interaction in GIP Figure C.3-2, the interaction for a J bolt anchor is 309/1910 =0.16 (Note that the shear is less than 0.3 of the shear allowable). Ifa 3/8" Kwikbolt were assumed, the interactionwould be 0.7 x (309/1280) + (539/1420) = 0.55.

Photos: W2T1.11, 12

Evaluated by: Date: /c'o ~S

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: Battery Rack Weight Distribution



ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0 )Description: PLANT BALIERY AB


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: A8 BATTERYEQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTEROF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTHOF THE ENTRANCE DOOR


JPPGTUR s

0.12



ID: 2-BATI-AB( Rev. 0 )Description: PLANT BATTERYAB


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERYEQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTEROF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTHOF THE ENTRANCE DOOR


ac W s ib

P—11

CC of upper tie

W x Sah = 2295 Ib

W x (1 — 0.4 Sov) ~ 4958 Ib

CG of lower tier

W x Sah ~ 2293 fb

W = 1/2 rack weight = 5460 Ibs

Soh = 1.5 x 57. FRS O 8 Hz = 0.42gSav = 2/3 x 1.5 x 5K FIIS I 20 Hz =

0.23g'ateral

Load = 2 x 2293 Ib = 4586

W x (1 - 0.4 Sov) = 4958 Ib

Overturning Momen't (sum moments about 8) „~ (2293 x 26) + (2293 x 48) - (4958 x 23)= 55648 in fbs

Base Channet

Bolt lines

D. C. Cook Unit 2Outlier Seismic Verification Sheet (OSVS)

GIP Rev 2, Corrected 2/14/92Sheet 1 of 4

ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev. 0)Description: PLANT BATTERY ABBuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERYEQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OFTHE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OFTHE ENTRANCE DOOR

.OU L I SU DE I I ION- ec calan Eeet ical E u'

a. Identify all the screening guidelines which are not met. (Check more than one ifseveral guidelines couldnot be satisfied.)

Capacity vs. DemandCaveatsAnchorageSeismic InteractionOther

b. Describe all the reasons for the outlier (i.e., ifall the listed outlier issues were resolved, then the signatorieswould consider this item of equipment to be verified for seismic adequacy).

The battery rack is an outlier due to BAT/BS Caveat 8 - Batteries Greater Than 10 Years Old.

2 P D DO U E 0 U N ~ono,

a. Defined proposed method(s) for resolving outlier.

The attached "Position Paper on the Replacement of the Safety Related Batteries at the Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant" (R. J. Roman May 10, 1993) states that AEPSC has committed to adoptingthe replacement criteria stated in ANSI/IEEE Std 450-1987. AEPSC's position is that thiscommitment resolves the outlier.

b. Provide information needed to implement proposed method(s) for resolving outlier (e.g., estimate offundamental frequency).

3 C

4CE C 0

The information on this OSVS is, to the best of our knowledge and belief, correct and accurate, and resolution ofthe outlier issues listed on the previous page willsatisfy the requirements for this item of equipment to be verifiedfor seismic adequacy:

F

Approved by: Date:

Attachment: Position Paper on the Replacement of Saf Related Batteries

~ QI

I ~ ~ ~

~ ~ I II ' It

~ I ~ I ~

~ Ml ~

~ ' ~, I ~ ~ t ~ I S I V ~ ~ I

~ ~ I ~ ~

I

I s

~ C '»I ~ s

I I

I I ~

I~ ~ »» I ~ ~

~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ II I ~ ~ ~ ~ I».

~ . ~ I I I II ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I

~ ~ II ~ I I I

I ~ II I

l I

II. S ~

I ~ . ~ ~ I 'Jl ~ »I ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ »' ~ I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ I ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ ~

~ I~ I ~ ~ I II I ~ ~

I~ ~ I Ii. ~ ~ I ~'

~ ~

»O ~ I ~

~ ~ »I ~

~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~

~ I »\ ~

V ~ I I~ ~ ~ I » ~ I ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

C ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ '

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ I

' I ~ I»J ~

1J ~ I ~ I ~ 4

I

lL.

~I ~ »

CHARTER POWER ersAfMS, INC, Plyrrmuth Meeting, Pennsyh an(a

DATE:

TO:

FROM'6

February 1984

Ron RomanAmerican Electric Power Service Corp.

Graham WalkerCM Charter Power Systems, inc.

SUBJECT: O.C, Cook Nuclear PlantTmfn N, 250 VoftSafety Refatad BatterySeismic and Ufe Qualification

I

In response to your1B Feb 94 memo, our mes indicate the following;'I

1. The Train N batteries were originally purchased ln May 1979 under,P.O. No. 0887M21-8, as the Train C AuxiliaryFeedwater System dattarfea.

2. The original Technical Specification, DCCEE-183&CN, Rev. 2, 1 May 1878,requfmd only seismic qualification,

3, The C&Q Seismic QuafNcatfon Report submfttid for these batteries and racksfs No. VL7S10-02, ReV. 2, dated 16 July 1878:. AlldoCumentatfcn at that timewas submitted tha AEPSC offices In New Yofft',City.

II

4. The 3DCU-g has a 20 qualified life at a 77F arinual average operating ,ltomporature. Qualification is by equivalence af conffguratfon, desfgn andmaterials to previously tested 3DCU-5, 3DCU-7 and OCU-17 models whichwere 20 years artNcfaffy aged in acconfance with fEEE<36 prfor to seismictestfng. The fEEE-344 seismfc qualNcation testing these caffe experiencedenvelopes the D.C. Cook fioor responsa spectrum. The reports for these !

qualification tests are located at C&D Headquirters fn Plymouth Meeting, PA,.and are avaffabfa for review.

II

lfyou have any questions, pfease call me.I

I

Sincerely,

Graham WafkorManage; Applications Engineering

TOTAL P.03

volt-u- »ax Note 7671

~ ~S~SCo JOopn

Pnono N

vsFrom

. Co.

Phono s

Fat 0

~ 4»'» ~ V t

Date May 10, 1993

nnnpeot Position Paper on the RepIacemeat of the Safety Related Batteriea at theDonald C. Cook Nuclear Plant

tronP~~Ro Je Roman/D ~ Re Smith

%pie

1) J.A ra l+)

s)

+ ~ ~vA~ ~~l+CA« ~I"i><

+~r/qg

Based on a review of the surveillance raporto, history, and maintenancerecords/trend charta for the 2AB battery, tho decision hae been made toreplace this battery during thc 1994 Unit 2 refueling outage. Theresults of similar raviaws for the five other safety-related batterieohas led to the decision to not replace any of these batteries during thoupcoming xafueling outages. Tha following discussion addreaaas thedotails of the reviews that, led to this decision.

AEPSC'a plan had boon to replace the oafoty-related batteriea at theDonald C. cook Nuclaax Plant ovary- 10 years even though they arepurchased aa 20 year batteriea. a nav lated

to ton nt, was developed aaod on prev oua prematurep a er eo and high temperatures oxperiencod in the

battory rooms. Beforo the decision was made to adopt this plan, astudy waa conducted by HVAC showing that it would ba lees expansive toraplaco the battaries avory tan years than to air condition the batteryrooms. Baood on this plan alone, tha lAB battaxy should ba replaced in1995 (since it wao manufactured in 1985), tha 1CD battery in 1995, the1N battery in 1999, tha 2AB battory in 1994, the 2CD battery in 1996,and the 2N in 1998.

During the EDSFI, the 10 year x'eplacemont pl,an came into qucation duringa review of the original battary sizing calculationo. After lengthydiscussions between the inspector and Mr. Roman< AEPSC ccaxnittad toadopting the replacement criteria stated in ANSI/IEEE Std 450"1987r IEEERocoaaended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of LargeLead Storago Batteries fox'enerating Stations and Substations.Specifically, IEEE 450 recommends replacing a battery when its capacity,aa determined by the 60 month performance tost, ia bolow 80t of thamanufacturer's rating. Under ideal conditions, a battery would roach

'L

A rule of thumb regarding high temperature is that, for ovary 15'Fabove a 77'F average temperature, a battery' lifo io shortened by 50% ~ Theaverage temperatures in the battery roomo at the DCCNP are leoo than 92'F(77'F + 15'F) however other factors, ao discussed in the body of this report,lead to accelerated aging and/ox aarly roplacament of large lead-acid storagebat'terios.

77 F average temperature, thorough maintenance throughout batterylifo, etc.

intra-System

r v ~ raa»»»u ~ VC

Poaition Paper on the R«pl«cement of the Safoty @el«ted Batteries «t tb+Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantMay 10, 1993Page 2

thi.o point somewhere around 20 years. Under current DccNp conditions,battery could reach this point sooner (due to the high battery roomtcmpcraturee mentioned previously). Ao implied in the previous twostatements however, factors other than age affect the viability of thebattery. Physical characteristics, such as plate condition togetherwith agc, are often determinants for complete battery replacement.Failure to hold a charge, as shown by cell voltage and specific gravityreadi.ngo, io a good indicator for further investigation into the needfox replacement. lt io a combination of those factors, and not simplythe age or capacity alone, that haa led to the decision to replace the2AB battery during the 1994 Unit 2 refueling outage. Neither thesefactors, nor the age or capacity alone, indicate the need to replace anyof tho other safety"related batteries at this time.

Xn support of the decision to not xaplace any of the other safety"related batteries during 1994 r~fucling outagco, the followinginformation i.a provided.

QQCA Voc ~g~

2)

3)

4)

March/April voltage trends of these batteries i.ndicatc that all ofthc calls have voltagoa in the normal range of 2.20 - 2.24 volts(on a float charge). For comparison purpooao, thirteen (13) ofthe 2AB cell voltages ware leos than (or equal to) 2.20 volts.A cursory review of the past tcn year's worth of these safety-reLated battery files reveals few occurrences, i.f any, involvingcell low voltages, electrolytelspecific gravity concerns, andoverall less than dcaircable physical conditions. Ao a contrast,there wexe many instances of these same concerns regarding the 2ABbattery.The files do not indicate that an issue waa made xagaxding thetemperatures of the 1AB< 1CD, 1N, 2CD, & 2N battery xooms. Thcfi.lco do show, however, that, upon procuxement & i.notallation ofthe 2AB battery, the manufacture'o xapxeaentativc atatod that thebattery life would be shortened due to the high ambienttemperatures in the battery room. While this is a recognizedattribute for all of thc batteries/roomo, it appeared to be morcsevere at the time fox tha 2AB battery room.Routine preventive and corrective maintenance ie a part of anybattery's life. This maintenance should be fairly consistent fromono safety-xelated battery to another, ao they are all large,lead-acid stationary batteriee. For the most part, thi.omaintenance hae been consistent for the majority of the Class 1Ebatteries. As expected then, these Class 1E battcrico arcexperiencing a normal, predictaEXe decrease in their ecrvico li.fc.The 2AB battery, howavex, hae demanded considerable additionalmaintenance and engineering time i.n the past couple of years

n Nine (9) cells had voltages leoa than 2.20 vDc and four (4) cellshad voltagco equal to 2.20 VDC.

4The aforcmcntioned study comparing the coot of more fx'cqucnt battory

replacement versus ai.r conditioning the battery rooms supporto this otatament.The atnbiont temperatures axe generally higher i.n the AB battery rooms, whencompaxed to the cD and N Txain rooms, due to their physical location in theplant and their ventilation systems.

Position Paper on the Replacement of the Safety Related Batteriea at theDonald C. Cook ?tucloar PlantMay 10, 1993Page 3

resolving issues concerning low voltages, specific gravities. etc.Ae the additional time spent maintaining this battery issignificant, it is believed that this is signaling tho end of thisbattery's useful life and that it will most probably not staywithin the Tech Spec range for individual coll voltages beyond thoupcoming refueling outage.

Toad acid storage batterieo are dynamic electrochemical devices. Asouch, the ability to predict their future performance and/or capacityrepresents a near formidable Cask. The decision to not replace any oftho other safety-related batterios outside of 2KB dura,ng the upcomingrefueling outages was arrived at after careful consideration of all thefactors involved- Tho information available simply does not supporttheir replacement at this time. Therefore, it is recommended that thosebattories continue to be maintained and tasted in accordance with thoIREE standards and the recommendation to replace them corno when thomaintenance/testing data supports it.

Preparod By/Date: os'/o 9 g

Concurrence 8y/Date: n~ ~AC~~pS'07'.

Concurranco Statement:

ass m

~~ ~~ ~c: 0+Co Joffxoy/4+Rr tdlderoon/Reit+ RomanR.I. GhoborgJ.A. KobyraD.R. Smith/J. Murtha - BridgmanT.A. Kratt - BridgmanAEPSC/NEEP Gafoty Related Battery File

(c:ir$rXbatteryioefmemo.wp)

TOTAL P.G3

0 ~ ~ I ~

~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ 0 0 ~

~ ~ ~ ~

mr rr

~ ~ I

e

~ - h 0

Q ~ ~

0 .104

~-

0 ~

0 ~

0 ~

RSRKRIRWRSRIISII:-RSMIIIII55IIImmlsIIRIISIIB55IIRSIIIIRIRSIRIIIRIRRIIII

y 4 e o o

IIHRIIRW~RwmIIERMWWWWMWWJ 0 0 H j

0 e r~ + ~ t 0 0 ~MWWMMWWW

~ ~ Cr0h

~ 'tta;EERIER0L ~

**12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019".TACHMENT NO. 1

NCHOR INS ECTION DATA SHEETW KV A6 CIAT7Egg ROOD

Unz.t Bldg. Locationz.-34~ — 8 t z.-3z z -serT-

Installatxon dwg. / Rev. Ecpxxpment No.


Rr T-aQ

('T~r II

INDIANAMICHIGAN POKIERSITE OESIGt< COtITIIOLLEO

WOfiKIIIGCOPY

OCT 0 5 3995

I.ER'K T@I Q(~QJ.<l>.1rI |

1

I

3-8/q.

+~I)I'<

(.Typ)

)I -3$ <.>)c)

/ i

7 C/fhhlhgBL TYP,

Eca.M Ni~Q

400k

i'd&

N

<RAN

9.


Reviewed by:~

~

Date: 2 3Date: I->6"4>

I r -r-'2Qual. /Cert. Inspector

w %n Date:Constructs.on Anchor Review Engineer


( >*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 0].9ATTACHMENT NQ. 1

i i/vOUnct

NS CT 0 T

Avx (D C'FBldg.

ASE P V I P I'I!=U ~

Location/2 " 3 ~ = 'i'- 7



2.->i i | - A'E|Equipment No.

INDIANAMICHIGAtt POVlCRSITC DESIGN CONTROLLCO

lVORKING COPY

OCV 05 >99S

GAY TBRYl0 Yz. A I 4 ~ 20 /q

(spp- Sut'PoRrDI=TAIL)

VJ Q L H f4'1 E ." J:

Q X3 4 4 i ORi <~DAhrGCC FRANC

~<AT TBR'

lO ~L pc I e "X ZO'i+"

(SPE ZLI! PORlQFTWI I

S7g

4.g'$

2

p II2C-8

~ II

cRov t P&e

T C.I4ANV I= I- GAS

Ecv>o A


Date:Date:ual./Cert. inspector

Reviewed by: T '4~4 Date:Construction Anc or Review Engineer

t o.-5-'I3

Page 1 of 3

Revision . 3


UnLt

Ig - 3P ZP-y

P CT 0 T

ucq'ldg.

~ & QA~raRg~JUL f'ME.~T. Boo H

Location



/ /2, BARaOi T.aC

Equipment No.

iiii)ll'lA:<iCi'IC "SIIE 0"SiGi'l CO" ~

'ii'OR!.IhC (.Oi'

OCT 05 1995

>'+z Q 1I

WI

'hI'~ 4

Date: 2

Date:

Drawn by:

l g.-z -c.'~

Verified by:Qual./Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: T'i' v~v~~=~.; Date:Construct'>on Anchor Reve.ew Engineer

Page 1 of 3

Revision .3

( >*12 CHP 5021. CCP. 019ATTACHMENT NO.

TkvoUnzt

N ECT 0 T

.- ux gotBldg.

A, 5 .BA>~E.RYEC V'~ > %COO;-q

Location



IIDIP . ~ Q. BOP

EVERY 2.Wu OR ERD

CATTP R'f FOR C-I MG-

UMISTRVTS T'IG-HTA~INS, r WTTI=RY

INDIANA MICHIGAN PO'V(fRSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

OCT 0 5 1995

UNl STRv 7(hR>C.gI-= Twa+,-2o58

IIYz Tt+K. E'c.OF RiGIDIh/SV LOFTI ONSOAR loQR~~WGATTBRI&5

QP,~<Pg'I'VAPOR i DP.l Al L


,Date:

Date:Qual. /Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: I '~F'I'5'h~-~(bQn Date:Construct>on Anchor Review Engineer

Page 1 of 3Revision . 3

**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019( ATTACHMENT No.

Equipment No.:Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:

CHOR XNS CT 0

HYS ICAL CHARACT RIST C

Dwg No..: j Q -QQp- p

Weld IDT e

SizeLen thCracks

Lack ofPenetration

Wi

Q/~@CC

esN

Yes

I/ cr

Yes0

Y s

Ct

s es

Yes Yes

W3 w4

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo'YesNo

es

YesNo

YesNo

Yes0

We d e Codes1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 =.Groove

Porosity es es eso

es0

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YNo

INDIANA41ICHIGAII POPOVER

SITE OESIGII CONTROLLEDWORKING COPY

0CT 05 19,I5

I.EP'K

T'quipment

base flexible: 0 Yes 8 Noons ruc ron re Date: -24

Reviewed by:

Verified by:ons ruc z.o c or evxew ngzneer

ua . e . npsec or

Date:

Date:

(o-5'- f3

Page 3 of 3

Revision 3

~ ~ )0 $t'R

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

s ~

e ~

RRRSRRRRRSRWRSI5--.IMIIIIIR8imimmmSRIMIIMIIIKRIIRRIIIIIIIRSRIIIHRRIERRImilliAIR%%LRRHLL

/S ~

0 ~ ~ ~

~ ~ t

E

0~ te a ~

E o ~

0 0

~ a ~

r

~ - l- ~

Q

t l~ l'4

~-

)

f

s 4

~ ~

o ~

0 ~

IBK~EP~0

~~RK~~~~RR -,-RRRRRSRSRSRSRSRR~ .

MRRRSMR58%55WRSMRIRSIH555$ 55RHRRSSRRRRRRRSRRRSESRRRHMRRWWRSRRRRRSRRRSRRS~RWRHHEQHKRH5%6%

IHMWRRRSRHRIRHr e

a e r rMMWMMMWWa ~a -.. EL. a

ka ~ r g ~ r g e~W~J'He~~:aneesmw

8Ke

Ak'

I ~

s

~ y ~ I ~

~ ~ ~ 4 lj ~ ~ e ~ ~

e ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ - ~

~ .~ %4

~ - 0 ~ ~ .e

e ~

~ ~

e ~

~ ~

~ '

RRRRRRRRRRRRRImi:;:mmmmilmMIIIRRRSElKRMIIIIHIRRIIIMlmlmIIISmimimlRIy y r e

~IIIIIREQR!SRwRSIIMWWMWMWWr e 1 e r y

r p i P t eMW&MMMW&Ca ~C a

'YSMe!ERP%%9&UIKQWJC

'h ~

P ~MWaMNaLMC)HNk&&%4%

~ a

~ ~

~ ~ I~

f ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~

Q 0 ~

- ~ ~ ~

5 - 8

o 1~4

o ~

RRNNRNR%5%5%555%- -.

IKmmmmmmmm- mmlESRNmmmmm

RES1mmmKlmmRSMEWRSmMMIR

y e o r e r o

~mmmmhhRRWHRmmmm

mmmmmmm55mr

~ y ~MWWMMM&Waj ~

0 C.' ~ ~

4 ~0 HFJBESISSI%leaSKHKaeRKSSP~ i . K~%K8'

~ ~

I ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~,.

~ ~ ~ s ~

I ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ - ~

~ .s is)

~ - C ~

s ~

~ ~

s ~

t

KRERHHRWHMSRRSIIIII .

RRRSNIRSRRR%mm5I=-IIIMIIIII55IIISRIEIIIIIIIIRRRRSRI5%MIEIIRSRSRSIIIS

0 ~ ~

~IIIIRWRESHESIIIIIIEIIIIIIIIIIRHIRl

0 I'

0 yMWWMMMW&~ ~4 4 ~ s a 8 a R E M

a%4%%~<' a.. a i o ~ la a ~

sssIsss ''~'%81sssssssssi%1E 's~s.ssvissw . ssaake~sssIMII 25a4KM<ÃtRQRUPk%0r

~ ~ rr ~

O ~l~e

APL ~ ~

~ 1

S 8 A DEPART)so=ATCONTROl.LED DOCUMENTCOPY NO.

i12 SHP 5050 NDL- 008ATTACPNENT HO.

UITRASONIC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

Unit ~QComponent — - AItem - ~ rSMaterial ~ S

Other

Test Unit/ S/N (Freq./Diameter 5 m4zReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

i<.TS c c-9

TEST DATA REMARKS

AM ru. s'/z

k.L

PERFORMED BY:C

REVIEWED BY: '" M~. Pc&


I EVEE,:.~~IEVEI'age

1 ofRevision 0

DATE: C /.- 5 y3

oly16192PG. N0.425

SAFE'HUTDOWN EOUIPNEHT LIST (SSELUP)

FUNCT IOH: 01ESEL GENERAT IOM

Equipment Class: 17 Train: 1

Equipment ID: I-DHE-150-AB DraMing Number: 1.12001 1-5151A 1-51510

System: DIESEL GEHERATOR COM1'ROL AHD IHSTRlNENTATION

Equip Description: AB EKERG DIESEL GEHERATOR

Bui lding: AUXILIARY Roan: AB EHERG DIESEL GEHERAI'OE ROOM Elevation:'87

Normal state: Desired state: Pouer Required: Sort: lI,R

Si~rting System Orauing Number:

Recnsired Interconnections and Supporting Conponentsl

ty Related Status:

E.

NUCLEAR SR Min/Dpt: KIM

ADDITIOMAL INFORHATIOH

alias Number: Prier I'rain: B

Conponent Served: AB EKERG DIESEL GEHERATOR

Nanufacturerl GENERAL ELECIRIC CO Model:

'Pnneil 1-OGAB 1-OGABX

Elcm Orauing: 1-98032 1-98051 1-98052 Uiring Drawing: 1-95301

Paver Source: 1-T11A11 1-T1164 1-TOAD-2

un I Ldoun: F Relay Only: Y

Component 'Type: ENG. GEN 3500XU,4KV

ISO Drauingsl

Detailed Location: IN tHE CENTER OF THE ROON

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-OME-150-AB ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN

THE CENTER OF THE RMManufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO



3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 20.00)4. Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum

Demand based on: 1.00 " Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum

687.00YesYes

0.800

G

LOG

0.0900.50 LOG Hz


33.00

Ca aciDemand 1

Demand 2

C:IGIPtGIPLspectra.desC:tGIPLPROJ0031 tspectra.desC:LGIPIPROJ0031tspoctra.des

RecordLabel Boundin SpectrumBUILDINGGround EI.EVATION608 BROADEN NBUILDINGGround ELEVATION608 BROADEN N



'G/BSCaveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassEG/BS Caveat 2- Driver and Driven Component on Rigid Skid.EG/BS Caveat 3- Base Vibration Isolation System Checked.EG/BS Caveat 4 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibilityof Attached Lines.EG/BS Caveat 5 - Adequate AnchorageEG/BS Caveat 6 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.EG/BS Caveat 7 - No Other Concerns.

YesYesN/AYesYesN/AYes

Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)Glp Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet2of4

ID: 1-OME-.150-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN


ANCHORAGE








YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes

Are anchorage requirements met'P

INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft targets are free from impact b nearby equipment or structures2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or


Is equipment free of interaction effects'

YesN/A

YesYesYes

C L D

~Clggg~g

SRT: George Gary Thomas (S&A) and Tom Huang (AEP) on 10/16/93.

Diesel Generator and driver not on same skid, however large contrete foundations originate from common floor,differential motion not a concern.

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-OME-150-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN


No interations. See AEP anchorage data for seismic qualification. Engine anchored by fourteen 2" or largeranchors. Generatoranchoredbyeight1" anchors. Generatorshaftendanchoredbyfour1.75" anchors. theANCHOR analysis gives a large safety margin (36) as shown by that done for 2-OME-150-CD.

Concern noted with regard to support of air manafold that supports aftercooler. Aftercooler supported by springmounted column. This concern was tracked and reconciled with items 1-HE47-ABS 8 ABN.

Zap shot Wk. 2, Team 2, Disk 2, Picture 20 8 21.

Evaluated by: Date:

i(-~—Attachment: Pictures

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-OME-1 50-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO

Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, INTHE CENTER OF THE RM

AB Emerg Diesel Generator 1-AB-150-AB

AB Emerg Diesel Generator, 1-OME-150-AB

AB Emerg. Diesel Generator 1-OME-150-AB

AB Emerg. Diesel Generator, 1-OME-150-AB

~ >12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

CT

UnztIZ.-3458- 3

Bldg.

Instailat on dwg. / Rev.


~T'Pc''F DI~BLEV&INE GeS~ROT OR ROOnA

Locationr.' &ME. —/50-3 6

Equipment No.

/rl~z

~ g ~

~ g0,

INDIANAMICHIG PSITE DESIGN NT L

WORKING C Y

SEP 2 7 $ 995

EIID

LERK / ~

gap— dv ~Ion Vlpw Lmwivs BAs~

Drawn by:( Verified by:

Q a C rt. Xnspector

Date:Date: ~-8 'Y- ~.8

Reviewed by: Date:Construction chor Review Engineer


*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACiQ&NT NO ~ 1

PME'n tl2.-3468 - l3

Installat on dwg. / Rev.

Eh/Q OP C(E.SE.I-G;euERATaR Roof.

Bldg- Locatzony. —awe, -l4o-AE

Equipment No.


COgr't

+Cp

/3y

9$

9tl

Oo Oos "q F

Sf'I'/~g"

5fv'

Q5q

~O

Qo o

PENT

MACHlh/E BASF ftmsanom~ H.

GRou T PawINOIANA MICHIGAN POIVCIISITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO

WORKING COPY

SEP 27 1995

I

Ol

G H

Qo Qo

qual

QMCHa R- MUV'"Ra.~SSaa lZ2. +4"g x )5>< "DE, (gEeC'BORE, TyP. (g) PL@ 5,

KT I,J.Z.L A..-< sr<"Loll,-A45%ÃS-kE-ABC+r//To EueZODEO mfa.

Drawn by:Verified by.

q . ert.Reviewed by:

Construe on

Date:Date: r -2~ - F~

Cn'age

1 of 3Revision .3

VvuInspector

('2

chor Review Engineer

**12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHKENT NO. 1

I Equipment No.-Anchor type: re ~c rTightness established by:Torque Mrench No.:Tightness verified? 0 Yes

Equipment base flexible?

0 "Snug Fit" Q

8 Noons ruc

0 Yes N Noons

DWg NOe

'orque

Cal. Due Date:Date:

1on

ruc 1on ARE

Bolt ZD

Caps "I/I/ CCATS I El 6

D W W & O'ommentsAIU'T <Ec SEE roc're "

Anchorlen th

protrudinglen th

Embedment

3~" 37>" rk

Bolt;riConcretecondition

Edgedistance

ACC

ogeh'K1 b LEgq q gg C9,~'II Q~Rt'

Xu rr46800 T &%DAN> EE~ T

~ <i~" 3" v"

Anchor +y~ y.Anchor

an larit O 0

Thread Feesengagement ~, I~

-y„'I

Q'' Q O

76cE556p ccs58 cc d8 cfcEIch emcee

~z

Comments:

c~

tAVerified by:., Cert:. Inspector

I

Reviewed by:Construct1on I MICHIGAN POWER

SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEDWORKING COPY

SEP 2 7 1995

( tat I ~+'AA~vl

Date:

Date:

Paga 2 ofRevision 3

S 8 A DEPARTMENTCONTROLLED DOCUMENTCOPY NO. 3

JOB ORDER NO.:



REPORT DATE: / d" 3 REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponent -OWN-/ &Item AC+o SMaterial .S.Other

TEST DATA REMARKS

Test Unit/ S/NFreq./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

Vs"

Vs"

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


I.EVEI:M DATE: / P

I EVE I: ~ DATE:


Equip Id: 2-OME-150-CD Train: 2 Equip Class: 17

D~<wing No ~ : 2-12002,,2-5151C, 2-5151D

tion: DIESEL GENERATION

System: DXESEL GENERATION, CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATXON

Equip Desc: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR

Building: AUXILXARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM

Elev: 587 'ort: S,R Notes:

Normal State: Desired State: 'ower Req'd:

Support System Drawing: 2-98033, 2-98051, 2-98052, 2-12002

Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: CD EMERGENCY DXESEL GENERATOR

MFR: GENERAL ELECTRXC CO.

2 SAs 2 DGCD 2 DGCDX

Elem. Drawing: 2-98033, 2-98051, 2-98052

Hiring Drawing: 2-953027

Power Source: 2-T21C3, 2-T21D8, 2-TDCD-2

Halkdown: F Relay Eval: Y

Comp Type: ENG. GEN-3500KW, 4KV

Iso Drawing:

Location: XN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OP THE MAXNENTRANCE DOOR


GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet1 of14

ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:

Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSLGEN RM - IN THE CENTER OFTHE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OFTHE MAINENTRANCE DOOR



3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = )Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding SpectrumDemand based on: 1.00 * Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum

587.00YesSRT

0.800

LOG //

//

r/

r~/r

0.0900.50 LOG Hz


33.00

'apacit

Demand 1

Demand 2

FileC:LGIPtGIPLs ectra.desC:tGIPIPROJ0034ts ectra.desC:tGIPtPROJ0034tspectra.des

RecordLabel Boundin SpectrumBUILDINGGround ELEVATION608 BROADEN NBUILDINGGround ELEVATION608 BROADEN N




ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL .

GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OFTHE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OFTHE MAINENTRANCE DOOR


EG/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment ClassEG/BS Caveat 2 - Driver and Driven Component on Rigid SkidEG/BS Caveat 3 - Base Vibration Isolation System CheckedEG/BS Caveat 4 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibili of Attached LinesEG/BS Caveat 5 - Adequate Anchorage.EG/BS Caveat 6 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated.EG/BS Caveat 7- No Other Concerns.

YesYesN/AYesYesNIAYes


ANCHORAGE



arid washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment

length, anchor spacing, freewdge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concretecracking.



considered.'.

The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate10. The adequa of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.


INTERACTION EFFECTS

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes

1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures.2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or



YesNIA

YesYes




Manufacturer, Model~ Etc.:

Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSLGEN RM - IN THE CENTER OFTHE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OFTHE MAINENTRANCE DOOR

S U SESMC LL D

~cbmgp~

SRTs are TR Satyan-Sharma, W. Djordjevic, J. Nieto, and R. Steele. -. 10/5/93

REF: 1. Anchorage Inspection Data Sheet, Anchorage Arrangement Sketches of generator anchorage, 9/8/93.2. Report on Seismic Analysis of Equipment Supplied by Worthington Compressors Inc. for the D. C. Cook NuclearPlant, Report EG-37017, 9/20/74- Engine on Foundation calculation.3.. Dwgs 12-3241-12, 12-3468-13.4. Anchor Bolt Schedule, Dwg 12-3073A-3.5. General Arrangement Dwg W501812AT.

Anchorage:See Reference 0 2 for seismic qualification of Engine. Engine is anchored by 14 - 2" anchors.

Generator anchored by 8-1" CIP anchors. An edge distance reduction factor is taken for the 4 inside anchors (theyare located approx. 3.7" from the pit's edge). Generator shaft end anchored by 4-1.75" CIP anchors ( modeled as1.375" anchors ANCHOR because this is the largest size anchor covered in the GIP). See ANCHOR analysis.

Photo: DG21-34&35, 36 and 37 (-34 of bolt, -35 from SW corner, -36 from NW corner, and -37 from NE corner).

Evaluated by: Date:

9


Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 )Description: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Rov//Col: CD EMER DSLGEN RM - IN THE CENTER OFTHE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OFTHE MAINENTRANCE DOOR


PJCT~UQS

Figure 2: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.35)Figure 3: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.36)

Figure 4: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.37)Figure1: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.34)





ANCHOR Report

~Ea t~eResponse Spectrum: SSE

Frequency: GIP - Rigid


Spectral Values:


Direction.North - SouthEast - WestVertical




Wejg+g

'umberof Weights: 1

No Weight1 10000.00 50.500 85.400 51.250

aleeNumber of External Forces: 0


~li wattg~

hach@.'umber

of Anchor types: 2

Tension Shear






Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter SafDia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact

1-3/8

Other

Other

Cast InPlace (A-

307)Cast In

Place (A-307)

26690.00 13350.00

50400.00 25250.00

1.00

1.00

0.30

0.30

1.00

1.00



~WI


~ance

Number of Surfaces: 2Surface Orientation

No

DirectionComp

0.0000.000

DirectionComp

0.0000.000

DirectionComp

Nz1.0001.000

Anchor Pattern for Surface ff. 1






Anchor Pattern for Surface //2







Anchor Bolts

.'oncreteLines '.

Concrete Points .

Weld Lines .

mmmm

geoJHefXK

'umber

of Anchors: 12

10

12

AnchId Coord

98.70093.20093.200 ~

98.7002.3008.0608.0602.300

30.75030.75070.25070.250

Coord76.75076.750

129.250129.250129.250129.25076.75076.75010.00022.00010.00022.000

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0008.5008.5008.5008.500

SurfId

ttt of elements per line: 5


sta~ stan s~art End End End sf LineX-Coord

5.00096.00035.500

Y-Coord39.36039.3600.000

Z-Coord0.0000.0008 500

X-Coo rd5.000

96.00035 500

Y-Coo rd131.360131.36032.000

Z-Coord id0.000 1

0.000 1

8.500 2

Width10.00010.00030.000






4 65.500 0.000 8.500 65.500 32.000 8.500 2 30.000




Dete a' educti F


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes




Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 3.70 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.

ssential Relays in Cabinet: No



ID; 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY



Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance-Edge1: 8.75in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes.Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes




Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 3.70 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: No

dequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes



ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-GeneratorsDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATORBuilding: AUXILIARY

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.'.


Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes




Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (54.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.

( Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes




Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (64.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in.Essential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes=mbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes









NoAnc Paii/

VailPaltr/Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM

7

1 20671.7913350.00

0.000.000.000.00

1 20671.7913350.00

1 20907.9013350.00

0.000.000.000.00

1 20907.90

N/A 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00NIA 1.00 1.00N/AN/AN/A

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

N/A 1.00 1.001.00 1.00N/A

N/A 1.00 1.00

N/A 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00NIA 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

0.77 1.001.00 1.000.771.000.771.000.77 1.001.00 1.000.78 1.001.00 1.000.781.000.781.000.78 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.M1.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.M 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00

1.001.001.001.00

1.001.001.001.001.00

1.001.001.001.00

13350.002 39829.26

N/AN/A

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.000.88 0.90

1.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.M 1.00

1.001.00

1.001.00

10

12

13395.022 39829.26

13395.022 39829.26

13395.022 39829.26

13395.02

NIA 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00

NIA 1.00 1.00NIA 1.00 1.00NIA 1.00 1.00N/A 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 0.530.88 0.901.00 0.530.88 0.901.00 0.530.88 0.901.00 0.53

1.M 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00'i.oo

1.001.001.001.00

1.001.00

1.001.001.001.00

N/A = Not ApplicablePall = Allowable Pull without Reduced InspectionValiPallr

= Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection= Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection

D.C. COOK Unit 2




Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSIGEN RM - IN THE CENTER OFTHE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OFTHE MAINENTRANCE DOOR

Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection= Outlier= Reduction Factor Not Used

RT = Reduction Factor for Type of AnchorageRN = Reduction Factor for Installation AdequacyRL = Reduction Factor for EmbedmentRG = Reduction Factor for Gap at AnchorsRS = Reduction Factor for SpacingRE = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance

= Reduction Factor for Concrete StrengthRC = Reduction Factor for Concrete CracksRR = Reduction Factor for Essential RelaysRP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying ActionRB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load PathRM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads

SI u



Spectral Accelerations (G's)No

10

12131415

17

N-S0.375

-0.375-0.3750.3750.375

-0.3750.375

-0.3750.150

-0.1500.150

-0.150-0.1600.1500.150

-0.1500.150

E-W0.150

-0.1500.150

-0.150-0.1500.1500.160

-0.1500.375

-0.375-0.3750.3750.375

-0.3750.375

-0.3750.150

Vertical0.100

-0.1000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.100-0.1000.1000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.1000.100

-0.100-0.1000.1000.250

Safety Factor49.38766 43749.19666.70036.84879.87280.17436.70384.08984.91941.166

124.22384.08285.264

124.22341 14257.447

D.C. COOK Unit 2





181920

222324

-0.1500.150

-0.150-0.1500.1500.150

-0.150

-0.1500.150

-0.1500.150

-0.150-0.1500.150

-0.250-0.2500.2500.250

-0.2500.250

-0.250

2091.746735.38537.89257.220

2091.80438.041

735.242



REPORT ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS

OF EQUIPMENT SUPPLIFD BY

WORTffINGTON CohfPRFSSORS INC.

FOR

TllE D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT

or

AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER

SERVICF. CORPORATION

REPORT HG-37017, Ldition C

September 20, 1974

CC 05A

SUMKCT

RL

oooo

Sheet ofSee.'

Comment No. DES CRXPTXOH

Engine SepecMications

Foundation Bolt Specifications

@@gine Flange Specifications

Poundation BoltsOperating,

— Tension - Rocking,Tightening, Seismic~

Stresses 8c F.S.

lA,3

Foundation Bolts - Bending

Foundation Bolts - Shear S Combined

Stresses K F.S.

15 P1ange - Bending - Rocking, Torque,

Stress &; P. S.

Conclusions

su~acr E~~i«P~ ~~rzowTYPF ~RG No W-$0/B/Zg a~ ~ ~J2sr .

xa

0

xO

Qzx

0 g =44

\

~ p'iv&dpggeV Soar S CZPr)(z ~g. r.s~)

Ill/SO (ke 44~m. sK- w~ssa)b) C'. k -4s Swuc w ('r~~ A~w Jaia)c) Ovr~pci c&nv. - /r J>ocul

J) po~g~w~<g = gfdP ('y~~ 5>~ca.)

eg pe. = 5z~ Cr~+ >~w Js- t1>sA)

~) louadareu AzT 5rsds( rkE8 = +CA kA X~srcw)wr

'(- goaooaHWodour'~ ''

She«t of~ Shts./ 7

a/s ~+

WCL.5D3

Li = 8.)l,g.L, = 6. O iH.

L~ = 6~.0 iN.

F<vgb/lTioH UogTS

b,: 'l,8I5'4D.- S.~ Pjog.

~25 iH ~

. 35'Z. X io '"/L/~

EioNP/ToH Lbc- .

. lo8 s io 'H/Lb+

(~ 4is7 N.)(So o'PSib

.Ol & y. io '"/gb+(Io 6o> lN )(Polio PSi)

42,0 IN

('3.sb7& iu )( s y>oo'si)

4,,„- 4, +6, tK,-golsti|<R. Rargr<oH gpouT Poise

.06%iiio "

7

A////4'o//L As%/pccu~n r .'

oh'/o

(o /g ]<I ~

7 go.v s (g. /Cr/t Io//.'/.by,

7 g/o

<. ~'

~ S

CAL 8Y

E>4 <>> ~l< FPu<DATiwAf

~g No 4'CIL/ZA~

+ aucu.I

oaovp

Sheet Mof~Shte.

0C5

zI

a

F l - (I ~ 4) SK 5'u) c $5 .5 < 8+ - W

CdiV'f/~ = =,o = D 7P/0l.

8g 'Wi> Ssdrss gp~~ PF~ouwmw~+irg: 7( ':/gyp'~<')

~j~>eA iud +u+swrs >/gvw.worww / 4'~size~~~ /oAyzcwy~c

@/<~ dN>~c 7o P~~c" Pw dwy~w gi pg,4'e Fp)

= WP~)

H

~~ = Pc/'file 5jeers J~~ goer =~.- ~~ ggjjgY,Pve rp kc~rwq i/~

Jil g

su~m +86/PE ON +@nba/7/PWMRG. No. -E(O 5 A

~gp. C- J: i"Qwet of~~%4.

x0

II <fg~

x0IC9

zI

0

3bh C4-Z3(4' 7S)

/2

~« ~zz ~4.io c~os~

.zs 3 y ro '"Z~eJL

DS.S zo /JY- Z Q~io = Z/p, 37 xl0 /gaag . ZD3'0

5 pic'+c Cc h's7 lh'FRzzs uir4 a~~v-y:

A'p I~P goLTS

5.@gal x /0

/ /2l9,37>./0 5.p x ro

Cd~~

A-A

s5sw r~"gZSg /o

~ ) ~

~„~ Fk'/r/Pr A fuuPddziu//

~RG No W g OY64 ~CAL BY

oaoue

Sheet ~ of~ Shte.

/E4. 4z.~

. Odd&

O

xO

zK

0

4ryz~c A +u~a///ruN;use Lk r HrrupE -Wc~ —/ou//ORnu// ur.rz Ckr XA'c:

Jig~ ~ /~~sruti.

8) F<ung gwsAwsw S/uWc'HW +i'm/ .'zEu = QS7As, g~s/s azw/rr pu~er

/ =.04dN 'XwC. Pju, g) ~ s/o 4>~uurbco g. gag, g gpss+= 8/parr/rN = . 2~

75oi. ru~/ C+aoe S3

~~~zCz.~),= id<-le ~'< .~crs

5) Cl &'rPilA'$ 5jgp(g — /ZcRc err Po giv4rrru 4/puu

cbA/ 5/p

''Yw B$ "

J'

zi

/I,gag

/f/P/O'' D',p

(Sl QGES oH SAhl.LEs 7 CR~AS <Cc.7>apJ OFCOM HD2 (T u FOUN DA'TI0H 60(1)

++4/A8' wFp~A////J/4//'YPF

~Rg. N<> k-S/0'/A /0CAL BY

GROUP

XO

"X0fee

CO

X

0

e)/w/r~>r /cA~/m tw Aces Pic'o //y//jew///t':us~~< 4 /+ed~ 4zwx~~z~~ c~ c = 4 z.

(/Arm gzEuc n//(gc'y /eupcuys — ////////<~

Cf~srr~~~r X~/x A.~)2= Aw,A~~ Pr~ = Z/~/ - /Ai////a /o+gw - @os des -Fj . PAP'w. XAc)7~ <8+

z~~ e, A ((zP@)c8 (y. z.)(Z. xx/)

gP~ 00< Q

TYPF

CAL SY

QiVr,rate- giY tl&h/87iVpl

RG N~ +- /096 / /GROUP '" ~Sheet of~ Shte.

!

/od 0, 3 Esp

5 9$ r 3 f'sl

3z 6/,9 aa

~s/

7 = r ~o/7 r

fzAnt Ezj'PcPsr SPE<148 ZnP/E +4 6.<

+- g~yt/iFzM =

9 = /''/l A~/> ) -iHC~'>~8

(pg) =~ P/g/fg ~) = /o 776 6

= ~/p) /o7766'(, 2)

> 6,Zog.

<j F><iN ~rMS = ( rcw&oa Cw gers)P~~l~r~( SEJM /L = /8 5 / I /'s/

4'4arw'Cr Sw/oss'z

pdwl~lc" Sea'sue+

5) scrag PF 5$ FE/Y,+E y/B'av AFF+~<+y- ~+J<it'Ides /8'gvos/Ed

~uAP~rnw Mrs, h PA&i<rivx~c. +aserrv~swiAg/lg gg Jgr PP gjP gcs8d.cQ

P(rrre~r ~/aa~iWe,<'gzyp~+r (S~ss. fr~ri~s:

sUMKT +$gp~ + oPA84Xi4~

TYPE ......~RG. No. ~ ~CAL BY

oaove

Sheet ~ of~~ Shta.

z0

z0QzK

0

Fi~v~ lAloklHirlklopl P4Tc~lAL 5/diiFic~7r~h'f.

CAL BY

E8/cpwE'iY fpuHorg/'roAI

gg N 5 00009k~GROUP

Sheet of~ Shh.

hde

z0I

z0QzI

0

W /%dr dF rsrugg- swdN4 -/Sw&'riuw gers losjg Pip/Pop'<gr„$d/J'WIC 5W

~, = 8+/rw 8 = ~6,+/rrr.

8, =<LOr+8 4 =,oe9'8 =.ot"/(I8IS) = 4' ZZ./+

o< P~ >) = 9! oo+ err

o ~ji+ -~~p(~ ~~)+- / 256 rrr

TYPF

CAL BY

Ew&Ne gw Wiu&4PJ~~G. No.

CALCU.

oaom

Sheet of~ Shts.lo

z0

X00x

0

/J Y Scdstrtutlug (g /rrro Qi 'oiN4 y Sug&8rrn/4 JlrlOLmcuW4,'

'"fur~ ag-.

pq cx437

GRoUp r z.C 't

Sheet ofJ.. Shts,gJ

Inrccc//ri//r, g~.co:

/

/

1

P Pc/(x M) $//(w-oL)jp// (x-$)g + C3

X0I

Q~ y/

E"/ g

p~(gg e ~ ~] I

+

'3

/ (X ~L) Pc( Cy cL)-

X00X

0

8cZcc<rrc/o/,'

SPA///'G Lo//cm'//r lu Lciroiuyg

gUgpg ZiVW/A+ Pp 845PPA /fdic

MG. Ro. ~

Ioooo

Sheet~ of 7$hh.

Date

/Z4 s~c

8) /E.~ i8i~A4f~gg~r J~i5 CPA~~

g ~~zcrrum~c ~a~wc g7wru ~w +wuzmwWoaWaaWru~ .

P" X~ew ~ r ~~~a = (P~) ~ ( +~~c~ Pu~ Sr7~e+w .

/or gS

/ Pd&E/c'>c'clxwzg ~c'cw)= ld/6' (i vJc'Eo. ~oog- prpr,z3 = zunis-wd@

e~ WwlcleeAr ~ Q 5 +$ /zc c vf

cuuiw~ ck X~w8/jailSUEJECT

CAL BY

f"Shoo'Pi/M

caecU.

eaoUp

Sheet ~ of Shit.

~oo~zi > rgro~//c1roj/1 '» Saf/

rs/o'vd

/+pe//48'//n// 4/047. F~B/A~z Nc c Ac uA/pe /o ///F ////oF/ower. Pnwr:i +6"/s//~@

//82'0/?/PcvYE/Pcg~r/~ +cP/7sis /8'o/- /so /ipAe //f P/r/// .

/u Xrt~ /auwda/~w Aces go~ Wo

5M>M/e 4nwds'.

~ ~

>~E~ EIIIrIIIIC.P'OWIII47IoIIf'- 5-~Do o&PJWRG. No.

oaout

Sheet of~ Shto./ / ~l~

III Moof OF FAllVFE SHcno- ill FouuoArloH Boa rS bul:To Sogt>o/7'Ai s6IRWIC- I.oh,JIHAD,

F„=(FI ~> t.urh CW'h~ tg(ZS'O) =

FRom P

P"

I OO 'flLF'g, I c T to H

FgloT ) ~pl ~ 'Io 9ol'L).LE 'tI l 9

7Pd

W8'/citaly

QEscu E:tnt i'd r orred/7i'c h' +YE~A IH 6 88$ E rj cf uM Po SHCJ+ For2i 85 TcF4+WSW j7TE8 EO 7M Fpc aOarroN got.rS.

3E f oubNA <ro N goer w iriHl. revctoo ) jt'. F tom l I9u

Wogttt < )Le- -o Rove CTtH II.'3IR 6 I —)gQ GEE.T'CS l

ToQ.QVG = l %CO -~s<0 Fr- impFtt+M bCt the OC +AC NNC

LINEA

CH15 4 i) l r'Iti'C, (

5QP C.=,~ b .-

(r>-cc)(.tugcb 7p Ooo L6~hQ VIlIl&k.C Mttad; ~Q. A~ "- LSg tel

SHAR< p< = 2, 6 ie7- =-„= t<9IY.i

—.',G~f>9 III IN

4$ 40~%%. 5ccito 4 npig Ag ~ 3.16 rt.(

5pg~g g:, ),Q 76 ( ll

iver/„~ r . 9V75 " tg. 76 /H

cg F.~., (ualaa') .. ical„o ~ g p 5 -. (6)(lo(o~o)4 li''rl.9 —I r ivv«l l

b~F~. (~.~ay)-]999> v1'3

CAL SY

EWp/A/E t/+ ~~~~gQ Sly~

6 No - 0 Yd<Waaovv .... <

Sheet ~ ofMZ,Shts.

o

xOI

0

XO

X

a

/ ~d~ ~F Hh~uP< ocul% '/ ~N E H~~4'J>4

fane i6'. 4: 7 =.pion~~~FZow ~sP~us~ fjwcXm& Cw>wg .

grf4A'ril~—HgZ

sic 5')

Ck. w)(P~~~ w)

/Fire = gd.7

8Arifpl/i4M~ 8~x 4cdg,

c>) f'~~ IZocA/A di, (p ~)

(pic,~iz~~+g = rs<F~p/

w= wg) =(q,>~a):~~) = see.~V ~>;»/J/< (lib>/)6 l9 ) pg~~ L/If

iYPE

CAL SY

&CIIIO@~yAIDHTi~II

~RG. No.> ~~~ "~< ~

L CALCU.

c-.j. ~

GROUP "

Shoot of~ Shta.

X0

C 4r~/>Cu44r)//oc44$ ///op/ P~A/Pp//r//c 6/fislci) ~upas gC~qL/W

///~ ju/a/8'/- QcM +i+//'rc-///II@ Zu~~5'Ad/+~ILo+Flg/~E +8 g+4P c4'4~~>/II'I/ 'C8 0'/IWCy

JFx2c sr Pew/'//Ir//II<~o+rI lp

FaW ><I/yp 6 P>C///4c FCr~r~rS r-put-g.

(gl/IS IJ PVEPII'dII'SFNVllIILI'P DOC ~r//E rp/~ocrIn/'E coI/I/II''J

4) 'gdcrs g~ I /I/'I/g$ E:(ddiuoI4$)O ~ a

ef~<rrwq

Z, 3+jZIO ~ 4DZ PZ/ .7a

e) 5plcrf /8cpo/2,~3o

Z4 7Z

yy = 7<, uc //. 'L /0 WPI, J'>OC

C ~/

'

SUBJ~ ENGINE ON FOUNDATION-

TYPF

CAL BY

G. No.

GROUPI

Sheet ~> of~> She.

z0

CONCLUSIONS<

POUNDATXON BOLT F S ~ 2 4' P >4 ) j F

THXS SAFETY FACTOR IS DUE TO THE PREIOAD ON

THE FOUNDATION BOLT AND OCCURS ON THE LOWER PART

OF THE 3-PIECE BOLT, FRXCTXON BETWEEN THE ENGINE

AND FOUNDATION ALIDW NO SHEAR OR BENDING IN THE

BOLTSE SO THE PRETENSIONS BEING CONSIDERABLY

GREATER THAN TZNSIXZ IOADS CAUSED BX ENGINE ROCKING,

IS THE GOVERNING FACTOR.

0v XI ENGINE MOUNTING FLANOES: R.S. - «.23 (P.Z6)

FREQUENCIES:k

A) ENGZNE ROCKZNG: F 3 9:('PS ((')THXB IS VERY CONSERVATIVE BECAUSE XT IS

BASED ON FOUNDATXON BOLT EIDNGATION AND THE

PKDENSION SHOULD ALMW NONE ~

B) VERTLCAL -' . ~ 44 CPScr'p v3

Coo

Componene Po. 2-086- ISO-~ Claia ~l

Any pazpicular area che Seismic Roviev Team should pay extra actontion cotYes ~ No (If yea, check icema that apply. )

Anchor TypeAnchor Diameter /Anchor Spacing ~Anchor NumberAnchor EmbedmentAnchor Edge Distance~Anchor Gap'Anchor Thread EngagementAnchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack

/wG~A


IE chere ia concern. for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicableitom and explain.

l.2.3.

Hardvare maintenance Type DiscrepancyDrawing UpWt~ Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Dosign Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:k) ORB

Actions Taken:

Proparad By T. Dato 1-~-'V ~

~ K

A

~ ~ r s

s ~ ~ ~ ~

y~ 0 ~ I

P

~ ~ ~ o ~

~ r

NI

'P

e

MPWi.I

I

'

L PV~

~o s s

0

/~ y~ // ~r

~ 0/

~ i

~ ~ 4

~ ~

~ a ~ ~ ~ I

P

~ ~ ~ ~ P ~

~ 8~ ~ ~

~ e ~ o ~

P

. Ie y I ~ a

O~ O~ O~ 0»

P

~ I ~

I ' I~ '

go I I

~ P

~I i /ifr. / r

~ ~

~ ~

«1Z CHP >Ox l. CCD. O 1 gATTACHMZHT No.

~g No.: /2-Z4C8 — l3Dwg No.: /Z-30T5A, —g

0 TorqueCal. Due Date:

Date:ons r c zo

Equipment No.:Anchor type: UD A CHEART PF—~~ Dia:Tightness established by: 0 "Snug FitTorque Wrench No.: QA

Tightness verified? 0 Yes 8, No

Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8- No 7ons uc

P YSICAL CHARACT RUSTIC

Date:ARE

Bolt ZD

Gaps

Anchorlen th

/Arpa7 eRMJ

5

-Cu'AGL-. - bV

S -5" S-4

CE.SS B

s-("

H'ommentspv A c oPQ

„Pc. R. 'Dw&.~ ~ + ~ -"/z-Zo~:A,

Protrudinglen th

Embedment/I

5 - I/gII

5 -I—/Cn

3/l g IIS-Ig 6 -ling g-2.

13 ll

/II I ~l I 3ll

S- I~( 5-l~ S-lg,

BoltriConcretecondition

Edgedistance

llZ zg

V '~e"

I'llZ~/b5"/&

I/2 /)(

ly/I

I(. 2/&

gk CK

Anchors acin

~ Il5 cg

p /I5 ~ IIS-B /3"Z'~ /3 II gll

S ~~ S~

Anchoran larit

Threadengagement

Ol( old oh OK

0"0''V

oK.

Comments: W A C. AC.Q H F:C.OOR C AT'I&6- WA

A,. H RS PRF-SP.=& ~,

Verified by:Qual. /Cert. Xnspector

I

Reviewed by: TConstruction

INDIANAESIGN CONTROLLCD

WORKING COPY

SEP 08 1998

Date:

Date: I->- J~

I.CRK ~ '~~ age 2 of 3gvi<IoA

S 8 ADEt'ARTMEt'GHTROLLED Du CUt4tNT

COPY NO.

12 SHP 5050 NDE-008ATTACHMENT NO- 1


JOB ORDER NO ~ : REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO. (Q ) Q

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponent - pr E,. 0 -CItemMaterial C. &Other

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/N k.Freq./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

SS

TEST DATA REMARKS

c-S-

Qvc ~I

'/z

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:

(

FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE. 008-1

LEVEL: ~ DATE:


Uatabase: K:SSEL2C. DBF

Equip Xd: 2-All Train: NA Equip Class: 20

Drawing No.: NONE

~

~~

nction:

System: EQUIPMENT CONTROL AND XNDXCATXON STATXONS

Equip Desc: AUXXLIARYRELAY PANEL AllBuilding: AUXXLIARY Room: CONTROL ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:


Alias No:

Comp Served:

MFR

Power Train:

Model:

Elem. Drawing:


Power Source:

Walkdown: F Relay,Eval: N

Comp Type: INSTRUMENT/RELAY RACK

Xso Drawing:

Location: XN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM


GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: Yes'Sheet 1 of 8

ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAYPANEL A11

Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets

Building: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col:.CONTROLROOM - IN THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF THE ROOM


Elevation where e ui ment receives seismic in utElevation of seismic in ut below about 40'rom rade rade = 608.00E ui menthasfundamental fre uenc above about8Hz est.fre uenc =11.00Ca acit based on: 1.00'Boundin S eclrumDemand based on: 1.00 * Desi n Basis Ground Res onse S ectrum

633.00YesYes

0.850

LIN

0.0001.00 LOG Hz


33.00

Caac'emand

1

Demand 2

FileH:tGIPLGIPts ectra.desH:$GIPIPROJ0059ts tra.desH:LGIPIPROJ0059ts tra.des

RecordLabel Boundin S trumBUILDINGGrounds ectrum ELEVATION BROADENBUILDINGGround S ectrum ELEVATION BROADEN

Does capacity exceed demand? Yes

D. G. Gook Unit 2Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)




Building: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROLROOM - IN THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF THE ROOM


l&C/BS Caveat 1 - Earth uake Ex erience E ui ment Classl&C/BS Caveat 2- Com uters and Pro rammable Controllers Evaluated Se aratell&C/BS Caveat 3 - Stri Chart Recorders Evaluated.l8 C/BS Caveat 4 - Structural Ade uate.l&C/BS Caveat 5 - Ad acent Cabinets or Panels Bolted To etherI8,C/BS Caveat 6 - Drawers or E ui ment on Slides Restrained18C/BS Caveat 7- Doors Secured.l&C/BS Caveat 8 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibilit of Attached Lines.l8 C/BS Caveat 9 - Ade uate Anchora e.l8C/BS Caveat 10 - Potential Chatter of Essential Rela s Evaluated.I&C/BS Caveat 11 - No Other Concerns.


YesN/AN/AYesYesN/AYesYesYesYesYes

Yes

ANCHORAGE


dam in ~ center of rotation .

3. The t e of anchora e is covered b the GIP4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length,

nuts and washers, ex ansion anchor ti htness, etc.5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered:

embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition,-andconcrete crackin .

6. For bolted anchora es, an a s under the base are less than 1/47. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity

reduction for ex ansion anchors.8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been

considered.9. Thestren thofthee ui mentbaseandtheload athtotheCGisade uate.10. The ade uac of embedded steel, rout ads or lar e concrete ads have been evaluated.11. The anchora e ca acit exceeds the demand.

YesYes

YesYes

Yes

N/AYes

Yes

YesYesYes


INTERACTION EFFECTS

1. Soft ta etsare free fromim act b nearb e ui mentorstructures2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or

structures.3. Attached lines have ade uate flexibilit4. Overhead e ui ment or distribution s stems are not likel to colla se.5. No other adverse concerns were found.

ls equipment free of interaction effects?

Yes

YesYes

YesYesYes

Yes





Building: AUXILIARY



IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLYADEQUATE? Yes

COMMENTS

Date: 11/1/93SRT: Satyan Sharma (AEP), Paul Krugh (AEP), Steve Anagnostis (S&A), Randy Steele (AEP - Relay Engineer)

References:1. Anchorage Package2. AEPSC USI A-46 Project Report No MT2, Rev 0, "Summary Report of Fundamental Frequencies Determinedby ln-Situ Transfer Function Modal Testing at Cook Nuclear Plant", Aug 1994.3. Drawing No 12-3388-3

A11 -15 form an 10"-2" long x 8'all x 2'eep control panel. The panel is constructed of welded steel plate,angles, and channels. The panel is welded along the front to embedded steel at 4 points, and along the back attwo points. A11 and A13 contain essential relays.

Based on modal test data of similar panels in the control room (Ref 2) ~ the SRT estimates the lower boundfundamental frequency at 11 Hz.

The overhead control room ceiling and raceways have been evaluated as part of the raceway walkdown andjudged acceptable - see the control room PASS form for details.

There is a door at the far end of the A6-A15 bank that is commonly left open. The door could, strike the panel,but the SRT judges the impact is far enough away from the essential relays not to be significant.

There is a ladder secured against the wall in front of the panel - it is secured so it will not strike the panel - judgedacceptable.

There is a fire extinguisher hung on the end of A6 that wilt bang against the cabinet. The SRT judges that it willnot affect the essential relays in A11 and A13.

Anchorage:

1. The anchorage package shows details for 1 of the four front edge weldments - the others are similar.2. The back edge weldments were not detailed - the SRT added these details to the anchorage package.3. The SRT conservatively estimates the weight at 300 Ibs/ lineal foot.4. The strength of the weldments is equivalent to at least a 1.5" x 1/8" fillet weld (4 kips per GIP Table C.6-1).The embedded steel is a 5/16" steel plate anchored with a 1/2" x 4" Nelson stud every 12" (4.4 kips per GIPTable C.3-1 including a .65 knockdown for embedment length). The weldment controls. The attached ANCHORanalysis shows a margin of 3.3.




Room, Row/Col: CONTROLROOM - IN THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF THE ROOM

Floor El.: 633.00Building: AUXILIARY



Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment: ANCHOR Report





Building: AUXILIARY

Manufacturer, Model, Etc

ANCHOR Report


Response Spectrum: Instructure RealisticFrequency: User - 11.00Percent Damping: User- 5.00

S ectral Values:Direction Acceleration 's

North - South 0.314East - WestVertical

0.3140.183


~eicehts:Number of Weights: 1

No Wei ht1 3000.00 60.000 0.000 50.000

Forces:Number of External Forces: 0

Moments:Number of External Moments: 0

Allowables:Anchor:Number of Anchor types: 1

Tension Shear

Dia Manufact ProductUltimateTension

UltimateShear

InterCoeff

Inter SafCoeff Fact

3/8 Hilti Kwik-BoltN

1460.00 1420.00 1.00 0.30 1.00

Concrete:Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.Reduction Factor: 0.85

Weld:Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.



ID:2-A11 Rev. 0Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAYPANEL A11


Building: AUXILIARY



Surfaces:Number of Surfaces: 1


ComNo

0.000

DirectionCom

0.000

DirectionCom

1.000

Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹1

gY


Anchor Bolts:

Concrete Vines: ~Ppgy(Peg!P

Concrete Points: ~5m+Weio uncs: ~5~5

~GeomerAnchor:Number of Anchors: 0

Concrete Lines:¹ of elements per line: 1



ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0Descri lion: AUXILIARYRELAYPANEL A11


Building: AUXILIARY




Concrete Points:Number of Concrete Points: 6

No Coord19.00047.00075.000

103.0002.000

118.000

YCoord

2.0002.0002.0002.00Q

22.00022.000

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

SurfId

Conc-PtArea9.0009.0009.0009.0009.0009.000

Weld Lines:¹ of elements per line: 1


NoStart

X-Coo rd19.00047.00075.000

103.0002.000

118.000

StartY-Coord

2.0002.0002.0002.000

22.00022.000

StaaZ-Coord

0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

X-Coord20.50048.50076.500

104.5003.500

119.500

EndY-Coord

2.0002.0002.0002.000

22.00022.000

Z-Coo rd0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

StId

LineWidth

0.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.125

Determination of Reduction Factors:


Anal sis Results:Analysis Performed: Yes

T eofAnal sis:Re ularS ectral Accelerations G's

No N-S0.314

-0.314-Q.3140.3140.314

-0.314

E-W0.125

-0.1250.125

-0.125-0.1250.125

Vertical0.073

-0.0730.073

-0.0730.073

-0.073

Safet Factor13.9738.111

13.9738.1118.500

18.535

-0.314 -0.125 0.073 '8.5007 0.314 0.125 -0.073 18.535

D. C. Cook Unit 2

Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 8 of 8

IO: 2-A11 Rev. 0Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAYPANEL A11


Building: AUXILIARY


Floor EI.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROLROOM - IN THE NORTHEASTCORNER OF THE ROOM

10

12131415161718192021

222324

0.125-0.1250.125

-0.125-0.1250.1250.125

-0.1250.125

-0.1250.125

-0.125-0.1250.1250.125

-0.125

0.314-0.314-0.3140.3140.314

-0.3140.314

-0.3140.125

-0.1250.125

-0.1250.125

-0.125-0.1250.125

0.073-0.0730.073

-0.0730.073

-0.073-0.0730.0730.183

-0.183-0.1830.1830.183

-0.1830.183

-0.183

7.5053.2903.3528.9217.5053.2908.9213.352

12.6267.842

37.0288.816

12.6267.8428.816

36.553


The anchorage can withstand 3.290 times greater seismic demand

I**12 CHP 502 1. CCD. 019

ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Unztz-maw'- o

CT 0

Bldg-

Mop < H E+SI- coR+FR,O(= l HE'ROOM

Location



AVx, Pa.LA,Y PAMC-LS A-II T'HRL( A-ISI'BR DMS I, 2,-Zg'I'F-lo 2-SS'<0-0

? -C4 4<A- I g~ 2."ZZ'46- I

~lg

/o-? p

A-IS

Q-0

IHOIAHA t(IICHICAH POW-ASITE OESIGH COHTAOLLEO

WOAKIHG COPV

SEP 21 1995

SEC DE,r4.I L I

'(z, g I '!'a x S 4 SH(n

ELev. VIEw LYG-,EAST'LEAK

+


Date: /Date: ga. g9

Qual ./Cert. inspectorReviewed by: F Date:

Construction Anch r Review Engineer-2-I- t3

page 1 of 3Revision .3

**12 CHP 5021 CCD p19ATTACHMENT NO.

NS CT 0 T

VBldg.

yCR + E4gl COB.IVI=-R3F T F.~WH

Location


Anchora e Arran ement SketchEcgxzpment No.

E

~ A ) ~~ ~i t.A '( g ~ ~I ~ ~'9v D~CD "S~~

~ ~

V~/tb1 ~

gltVC ~ 'SK4 <~I ~ ~

V9 r I 'Lk~ ~~VSI

os~ ~

S> D e')~/I II I lg ~II

(6~ ~ 28 ~28'Z8 ~IB~QI I

~ I

28 2B ZB ZB 'Ie

ZE:E: DF-1 AIL I

CTI "A

A'A..'NOIAtIA

MICklGAt( POWERSITE OESIGN Cott TAOLLEO

WORKING COP'f

SEP 2i >99<

5t~o

(I.

~~A = jhrPCCF S5]BLK LEAKT

Drawn by:Verified by-

Date:

Date:

/y 3

Qual. /Cert. InspectorReviewed by: Date:

Construction Anc or Review Engineer

Page 1 of 3Revision

""~4 <Ha'021.CCD oa9ATTACHMENT NO. a


CHOR INS CTIO

H S ICAL CHARACTERIS C

.: 2~22 eV—

Weld IDT e

SizeLen thCracks

WJ WZI I

y// g I/

0

W3 W< WSI TAcK. I/II'

3/'l

W7'z"

YNo

Weld e Codes1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 Groove


o o o 0

YeNo

YesNo

W I IS WELD Pb oN 1=OUR S(DE.S,W Q Y8" L/hrQE.R CV1W 3 +8 ClhJC)BQCL/ 7W 4. /4 LrNDCR Cu T

'/4. UIVO E:P, CU t.

4v Cg /4 UMDL=RCVT'8

/4 UADER cvTII

3Ia 8

I2

Q HOLW WIt-H WASHSR5

RMBE.@DE 0~ C

I

4l X 3 X~ PING LI:-

3 HAGI,

0

a WI

SEc.TIo~ e E'aYAIL-I S E.c-~101 C C.

Equipment base flexible: Cl Yes E Noons ruc son re

Reviewed by:

Verified by:ua . er . npsec or Irrl)IANAFiIICHIGAN PO'V/FTI

SITE OCSIOrr Cotr TIIOLLt.oV/OII~Ir G COI V

SEP 2 l 1993

ons ruc son c or evzew ngzneerDate:

Date: 5 +

page 3 ofRevision



FOR TANKS Ec HEAT EXCHANGERS EVALUATEDFOR USI A-46 THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE

PROCEDURES IN SECTION 7 OF THE GIPRAI ITEM 5

This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspectiondocumentation for a cross section of class 0 and 21 tanks and heat exchangers that are notcovered by the procedures in Section 7 of the GIP. The samples selected are designated with an* in Table 2 and 3 of this RAI. The following examples are included:

lass

21

1- T-113-AB11-HE-13

21

21

21

1- -34-1-'I'K-111-'1 K-37

21

21

21

2- -112- -32- -134- D

Equip ID: 1-QT-113.-AB1

" wing No.: 1-5151A

tion: EMERG DXESEL

Train: 1 Equip Class:0

System: DIESEL LUBE OXL

Equip Desc: AB EMERG DIESEL PULL PLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1

Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB EMERG DXESEL LUBE OXL PXT


Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N


Req'd Support Comp:


Alias No: Power Train: NA

Comp Served: LUBE OXL STRAXNER 1

MPR: NUGENT

1' 1554-4L3B

P lElem. Drawing: N/A

Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source: N/A

Walkdown: A Relay Eval

; Comp Type: STRAINER

Xso Drawing:

Location:

DC Cook Unit 1


ID;,1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. OtherDescnption: AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBEOIL PIT,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554PL3B


1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic inputElevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00)Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 8.00)Capacity based on: Judgment

5. Demand based on: 1.00 'ealistic Mean-Centered Floor Response Spectra

587.00N/AN/A

Ca acitDemand 1

Demand 2

File

C:LGIPtPROJ0031tspectra.desC:<GIPIPROJ0031'Lspectra.des

Record

BUILDING uxilia ELEVATION587 BROADEN NBUILDING uxilia ELEVATION5S7 BROADEN N


ANCHORAGE

2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural fretful.,damping, center of rotation).

3. Thh pe of anchorage is coveredb the GIP.4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts



6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4.7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity


considered.9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate.10. The adequac of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand.

Yes

YesYes

Yes

YesN/A

Yes

YesYesYes


DC Cook Unit1SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) ~


ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. OtherDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBEOIL PIT.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554PL3B

INTERACTION EFFECTS


structures.3. Attached lines have adequate flexibili .

4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse.5. No other adverse conce'ms were found.

YesN/A

YesYesYes

Is equipment free of interaction effects'

SRT: Tom Huang (AEP) and George Gary Thomas (S&A) on 10/6/93

REF: 1. Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics DataSheet, Certified 6//6/92 for both 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2.2. Dwg 0 10-0893. Worthington Co. Full Flow Oil Lube Strainer Calculation, 8/26/74.

MFG: NUGENT, WM W8Co -1554M-L3B-DN-100

Seismic Capacity vs Demand: The Bounding Spectrum does not apply for Class 0 items. This component isseismically rugged based on SRTIudgement and inspection, and anchor analysis.

Anchorage:Supported on 4 angle legs. Each leg is anchored by one 1/2" J bolt anchor. The ANCHOR analysis wasperformed for 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2 together, since they are connected by a relatively rigid pipingsegment.

Frequency was judged to be greater than 8 Hz.

The total weight is 17305, with the CG located at an approx. mid-height = 33" (Ref. 2).

The minimum embedment of the 1/2" J-bolts for 1-QT-113-AB1 and'1-QT-113-AB2 is 9.125" and was used for theembedment reduction factor for the J-bo! ts.

The SRT also judged the bolts may be subject to prying. therefore a very conservative.5 reduction factor wasapplied for prying.

ANCHOR analysis includes nozzle loads as specified in Ref. 3, Sheet 15. Conservatively assume that the inlet andoutlet nozzle loads are distributed between the two strainers, 1-QT-113-AB1 and AB2, because of the way theyare joined (see Ref. 2). Therefore the nozzle loads modeled in the ANCHOR analysis are the absolute values of

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUA'TIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 3 of 11



Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554AL3B

the larger of the two loads specified in Ref. 3, Sheet 15. The way the loads are defined in Ref. 3," they correspondto the x,y,z coordinate system as follows: c=x, a=y, and b=z.

The ANCHOR analysis even with the highest nozzle loads and anchorage reduction factors, shows a high marginof safety (2.5).

Zap Shot, Wk1, Tm 2, Disk 1, Picture 45

Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: ANCHOR Report

DC Cook Unit 1



Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EOG LUBEOIL PIT,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554<L3B

P~CI BKR

AB Emerg Diesel Full Flow Lube Oll Strainer 1, 1-QT-113-ABI

DC Cook Unit 1




Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B

ANCHOR Report

gy~gi~g'esponseSpectrum: Instructure Realistic

Frequency: User - 8.00Percent Damping: User - 5.00




NciahtmNumber of Weights: 2

No Weight1730.001730.00

22.875-22.875

0.0001.000

33.00033.000

EQKQRNumber of External Forces: 2

No Fx Fy Fz1.23E+0023.31E+002

1.23E+002 7.03E+0024.02E+002 6.24E+002

0.0000.000

12.000-12.000

24.00024.000

%@arnis'umberof External Moments: 2

Mx1 8.64E+003 -1.86E+0042 3.98E+003 -8.52E+002

6.86E+0032.54E+003

hlhMrat~haabuc'umber

of Anchor types: 1

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EYALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GlP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 6 of 11

ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev, 0) Class: 0. OtherDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLONlLUBE OIL STRAINER 1


Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554<L3B


InterShearInter Saf

No. Dia1 1/2

ManufactOther

ProductJ-Bolt (90

deg)

CoeffShearTension6660.00 3330.00 1.00

Coeff Fact0.30 1.00

Qaac&c'ltimateStress: 3500.00 psi.


~iAllowable Stress: 30600 psi.

Qi~g~Number of Surfaces: 1


CompNx0.000

DirectionComp

Ny0.000

DirectionComp

1.000



DC Cook Unit 1



Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBEOiL PIT,


Anchor Bolts: mmmmConcrete Lines: ~mt//+Concrete Points

.'eld

Lines

.'ux;

hrzhac.'umberof Anchors: 8

NoAnch

Id Coord-30.719-16.531-30.719-16.53130.71916.53130.71916.531

Coord-7.260-7.2507.2507.250

-7.250-7.2507.2507.250

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

SurfId

0 of elements per line: 4Number of Concrete Lines: 0


No Coord-30.719-16.531-30.719-16.53130.71916.53130.71916.531

Coord-7.250-7.2507.2507.250

-7.250-7.2507.2507.260

Coord0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000

SurfId

Conc-PtArea4.0004.0004.0004.0004.0004.0004.0004.000

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEvVS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 8 of 11



Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554AL3B

EcldJ.iaaf '

of elements per line: 4Number ofWeld Lines: 0


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment I.ength: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.Gap at Three'ded Anchor: 0.00 in.:Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes

Reduction Factor Input for ..ichor 0 3

Adequately In"tailed: YesEmbedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: No




Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBEOIL PIT,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 15544L3B

Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes




Adequately Installed: Yes'mbedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.

Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru InstallationEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes





DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. OtherDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINEP. 1




AncNo ld

1 1

2 1

Pall/VaIl

1398.603330.001398.603330.00

Pallr/VallrN/AN/AN/AN/A

RT1.001.001.00

RN RL1.00 0.421.00 1.001.00 0.421.00 1.00

RG RS1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

RE RF RC1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

RR RP RB1.00 0.50 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.50 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

RM1.001.001.001.00

3 1

4 1

1398.60 N/A3330.00 N/A1398.60 N/A

1.001.001.00

1.00 0.421.00 1.001.00 0.42

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.M

1.00 0.50 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.50 1.00

1.001.00

3330.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.005 1

6 1

1398.60 N/A3330.00 N/A1398.60 N/A

1.001.001.00

1.00 0.421.00 1.001.00 0.42

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.50 1.001.0Q 1.0Q 1.001.00 0.50 1.00

1.001.QO

1.003330.00 N/A 1.QO 1.00 1.00 1.QO 1.00 1.QO 1.QO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

7 1

8 1

3330.001398.60

N/AN/A

1398.60 N/A 1.001.QO

1.00

1.00 0.42"s.00 1.001.00 0.42

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.GO

1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 0.50 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.M 0.50 1.'00

1.001.00

3330.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N/Aall

= Not Applicable—Allowabi Pull without Reduced Inspection

Vail = Allowable Shear without Reduced InspectionPallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced InspectionVallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection


RT = Reduction Factor for Type of AnchorageRN = Reduction Factor for In tallation AdequacyRL = Reduction Factor for EmbedmentRG = Reduction Factor for Gap at AnchorsRS = Reduction Factor for SpacingRE = Reduction Factor for Edge DistanceRF = Reduction Factor for Concrete StrengthRC = Reduction Factor for Concrete CracksRR = Reduction Factor for Essential RelaysRP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying ActionRB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load PathRM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads


ype of Analysis: RegularI A elerations (G's)

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUAlION WORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet11 of11


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG I.UBEOIL PIT,


No1

234567891011

12131415161718

20212223

N-S0.325

-0.325-0.3250.3250.325

-0.3250.325

-0.3250.130

-0.1300.130

-0.130-0.1300.1300.130

-0,1300.130

-0.130.130

-0.130-0.1300.1300.130

-0.130

E-W0.130

-0.1300.130

-0.130-0.1300.1300.130

-0.1300.325

-0.325-0.3250.3250.325

-0.3250.325

-0.3250.130

-0.1300.130

-0.1300.130

-0.130-0.1300.130

Vertical0.067

-0.0670.067

-0.0670.067

-0.067-0.0670.0670.067

-0.0670.067

-0.0670.067

-0.067-0.0670.0670.167

-0.167-0.1670.1670.167

-0.1670.167

-0.167

Safety Factor5.8437.4565.8437.4565.8537.2137.2135.8532.4782.7562.5032.6952.4782.7562.6952.5035.1149 3858.7525.0405.1149.3855.0408.752

Minimum Safety Factor: 2 I78


SUBJECT F F nM

CAL BY

S AIN R

G. No.ak

GROUP

~~of Sos.

PAGE DESCREPTIOH

z0

O

XQ

X

I

0

2-S

7-9

10-11

12

13

14

15

29

30

Fig. 1

Frequency of System

Seismic leg forces

Nozzle loads

Leg forces due to nozzle loads

Leg stresses

Base Plate

Flolding down boltMeld of leg to tank

Local Shell Stresses

Recommendation sketch (SK-7940)

Summary

CalculationsSUBJECT: WC/ -/Ci iC ~ ( Q..(

JOB NUMBER / 8/'/'ILE

NUMBER "(0SHEET / OF

SY A Y /'A/OATE~FAPP CATE

CalculationsSUBJECT:

JOB NUMBER

FILE NUMBER

SHEET ZBY ~~1APP

Z5-r dC-<0

OF

DA~DATE

l27'r

ps S

fif

FA'r

/~f0'

CalculationsSU6JECT: SHEET Z OF

BY A TH/ DATE~'PP DATE

+Cj 2 t/Ol\g+Q 4 «4«L / gS«t~

AC AZgA'474 Sds

gC7

/0 >

Q/

4t

g«

Z//2 B

CF

N7/S

IdZ4

/2 ~S"r —.

Se~p~

'i0'5''/

.rg . /r= ' +44

C

rim«/P4 f

g'(

/z w"FAC( t'

/Sgs

Q~Z' c~ ~

F

r JCar: ~C g

/F

Ã

~ Q4 «

~ ~

Calculations ~"

EU@EDT: fjordJIVE reQ/g. ~ 1 ~/AJ/E+

t~,I

SHEET

BY

OF

DA

IJOB NUMBER 26 I TdJ

FILE NUMBER

APP DATE

~ WcrvOM F~eArW')P

7u~)( r- ~o>'-.+ 6v S'.~

r~/ ) l-a'gw

E

C«34>EE MOTIF5

+

/UA7 V

CalculationsSUBJECT: LJog~)ply ~ypl

8 654 Or l. ~A/&k4

Fzr uw<c o<

FILE NUMBER

SHEET OF

BV I ~

DATIVE

APP DATE

7)rr ZZC7 )od

~p g ( —F. " FEZ 5 F. gg~ px~ ~z)

r~rJ)C

x (IS &4S ZC~)AJ C

x ~AFEFxxlz 'x,assed+ sZ

Q~)my

Is?+PD4 T 9?e t 24/ 7P

~7~ /2d 0

cgaZ rr 29/

2llrS99~6 l z

~l.6?~l2

87 + 3,{?r,

ll)&I QZ,M

x

7,(2. ]

Ax/g/

WA5% CfpfC./)r-))

~~< "i/8&

Formals-iA Fizgcy ~ &~g~Ay/~ — l P ~

't6xsnc 8esEr p sr +~ srs ~ az F) ~l x?zoP +sos g F~ v

azszj'El

CC ~K l2)'4( FEE@ w EP~~>1 ~~ 5

lO Z+O

4> g4 rg>EE(O I

/224 4

Cak:ulations.SUBJECT:

FILE NUMBER C I 0SHEET~ OF

APP DATE

CalculationsSUSJECTI

„,~PFILE NUMBER + l 0

SKEET~ OF

eV A L H DATE29

APP DATE

x DSC~

X

ZzC 25

p4 /7a >

gi 2.¹/


~PFILE NUMBER

SHEET~ OF

BY +CW DATE

APP DATE

3l

I

/F/

K

OzXO

Cele UiationsSUBJECT:

FILE NUMBER Q~ lSHEET~ OF

APP DATE

z

' ~ E

~ CalculationsSUBJECT:, IJy~rHWC7 oA/

rl/o

J-~)f8 A7 G4 SIT PP'EtZW

FILE NUMBER

SHEET OF

BYE r OA~~/gDATE

prACr]a+i P Pierr|CrlOV ~ Srg<CrxOal

D an dr /~ca r

/2.6 mid -W.i

- HrZ W.j -a,d

Wc 7

-4dr3

g,5 -asA i e-ig,/ -Wee irk

iS,S -/4P u.i

-I/AZ-39rd-

77,'5'82li

-87)]~0//QrS

NEO

/D7.0 A7

Co<By/Al /045

-/ IB-5 —+S'Z

->Br7-/&Br'B.7

)- a7Z-l~~)

O

CC

O

CalcuiationssuwscTI QocruFFT'o&

5reru A. Zs-~fr OP I-r~C ~

JOB NUMBER

FILE NUMBER

SHEET

BY

APP

619,o

OF

DATE

DATE

~Eh /A

F OL(F 4 OFF g ATF

<GO ~ ~ cg CJ

g ~PC ( gA~ ~FFFDOF'F" /0)

c -Pg,PSq'cnxc

y - «B,G ~ ~ - iS'S,G' g 482F) +$7+

- /99r 7

"/9917'/r>e'er&+ 5+rB >l/i~w~b -S'~/g-//,34 - w,47 -/.5 «48 7&

- /7,/2 Ws/

(sFrd sziFrrr Fo )

/'r ~44?M P r™

g/'

( V<M~ld+3

aqua ++

Calculationssu+EcT: 4~grA w'c7ohl

/age& dr Sos'p &cd'5

JOB NUMBER

FILE NUMBER

SHEET CBV lAPP

OF

ATE

OA7E .

/a)LÃT /vmr

/jiZ 4,7 -8r 7-/6il

a,2 -Br graf3//5i5

-St

are''

CalculationssUBJEGT: ~4R7 //IA<re

fuge& g/ 9QsF np Z4'

F I LE NUMBE R

SHEET

BY

APP

OF

DA~TE

DATE

JOB NUMBER N/ rO

/&mr JWLEP

F~

Wc

/7 2

8'E2

-5ZA

-37

-Bdr7 8(7 -28$ C3rgFdic

-/B A,9 -e/

~5',P.ER

/DOr

2', Or0-le-II& ~7z& -as4

'7r,l

?Br2.

~ I

4d

. 4r3

muvt7Zo+S

's

Q,B -aZ.1 /7Pr 9

-XZ.4

—77- 2

—/LSM(~ .r~ 5

r 69,8,

~ Xj/r7-'

+7'T iE

'0z

0

Calculations'UBJECT:

PoA?c~ g7 9AM~ 'c5

JOB NUMBER

FILE NUMBER

SHEET KBY

APP

/,oOF

'ATE /DATE

IHuZ7 C~l IecEp Aur

/3F6 HC'i/ 8F5 HE 7IWi4

-m,5-/6i/

ZSA-Wr3

BS(dsc}E3

-/o70 -4i7-3g2 -JCO

-BF g ~D F7 40F3 -/8S j4P 77iS

//5i-zs>

i $)C /

~ 5"I


„~fFILE NUMBER s t 0SHEET~/ OF

APP OATS

.u~ r

3's'K

SF K

o 6'P+~ OPIA

s+g E 'j, K

Ce'zs. ~SSS'4 gg

WFSl

i~s" Y ~ oh''~ ) 3C~ - ' >C:C-'

4's /~ QgSF P

FQ~ I

fez'6/ gl ~ so

4s" 4i x+ v~-c ~~+

X = -4'dv —/XX F S'g = - A/SF ~ yF

~ ~

I

QS ~j = ~2k'5

-res- -rOZZ

rr>-"=- res Krrs < & 9g r24" s ~rr' w4 ~ s-<

ro Pw7 ''O''


JOB NUMBER

FILE NUMBER 6 I 0SHEET~ OF

APP OATS

— r~ S ~ — g~~ — /5 ~

y~ +(g gr. -g'.g y = - ) s's .y - 4 s = -ag. p'

~ rti.~ «»..~ PEP" t r 4'/CP J

V 7

(/4/ K 6 sC 'I /O'P s''//) //. SI

~d5S W rSC rr ~ + AO>P'4'po w '~y.0 ~ MA" Ping

'SFFS

- 5'C r-Ss c

r7pa H fr ~ 4

K~ - S'Z .7 rO + ~ S'4's' = 145 3'

Ir'C ~ <<'~ rg V=,~s> ~

..znC ~we c.~

ASIA

+Qp ( r/j .. ~C'~w~ i Aging o

zVA

~ES~ FS E'Fg

~p pro

/rr g'/ p /r 0

gag / f SE'.~E 8 gus'K ~ Z r~1ne /. r

S r

= rrv'


JOB NUMBFR

FILE NUMBER

SHEET

BY

/ O

DATE

DATE

/~p/Ag

;~ ~'f~ «vj M~ @r"(/&W + l~ &) «A ( IC'rE!+

y C2 ai 2

lo2P

Ip g e ~ rEEE rr't/r.

gr'(.jr' «<7l rx«AE .w)mArD

E y,lrcP.'jvr~~W E'~

/(4 o'MW~/ i>p+ /4


FILE NUM8ER

SHEET

ev

APP

Q.- (c

OF

OA~kDATE

A. JE (( :Z~r /de oCI'+0

/4 to

+ (~~~-D) J '.DgP~ %

~1 &o( ~ ogp

/ C

7c a~&

r- y. Z,y C

C

FKP

~" M.( r.

~ ~

2IJJ 7- g. ~ yr FS

Arf><j~~~rSy g ~~ A

/

0CC

0z

CalculationsSUMECT:

„„,~F' F.FILE NUMBER

SHEET~ OF

APP OATS

E" y"

~Ca AVE g > E5'7

I~ JA.

z ~ y'&Ma4'm

JP4&~iT'C

r s4~I~~'j ~ ZPE'ii)

IggZ Ted

>K

s

C

t ~ gfs APtg SggP ~ ~gg - ~c J d

~St 8'c tS


JOB NUMBER

FILE NUMBER

SHEET

BY r

~ APP

OF

DATE

0 ATE

~ ~rr rr rr,/rr M / r~p~ r r r/rf p /(Z,(e~/ rr /(A ~

C4F/~ ~ —Q7P lj

Qow7LR C>0, lr HLC

r afUrr apF- ~47 raw.

T2<L

t./ i92. /44 ~ lC

~ zcZ5 X .~dZ.~T ~~I

o<.

98~,

~ 8" ~ 2

,'„~~ Euic Fiow L~ac. Gt~ 'STRAINER

TYP RG. No. /0-O89

CAL BY

C -I0GROUP

Sheet of

a/z ~/~~

z0

u

Local S Hc~~ - Tz.css as '

go~'hem LoAbs ~ (As pEi

sn/~r.''i

VZZS C.Q -/29 Lb~

F8 + +/0 /6/ - 7o3 Lb~

fc ~ /zZ /bg,- sr~ >gj4 t5'L>(A) w-Q I- IA7cl) w-/bg

A + s~zbz) w zb<,-z-i;z&4i~-+Ac t y4j(il) iN Lbg - 7z-ci&z) ur

, C

c+ciaI.C.f

6/zA 7+3

OLl7LET;+ +0l lb( ~ /$+ O Lby, -Ca+

48<, - ~ L.b~

k p>oft) ~ -lQ ~- lf]2) /n'-LLg

2/2 ((Z) lpl-lip 2 C(E) ll45'/o(>R)w ~by - 3ER.C/~) w-4@

~Y+

0LJ7+ @

l5.Gr2.5

TYP

CAL BY

RS. No. ~~

SU~EOT FULL FL>'W LU E OiL STRA IN ER. eaour

Sheet of Shta,

XL T'RANKKtL OF LoAbh FR< M IDYLL'T g OUT LCT'HOKKLEhTo TAvK sH<it Ho~zizs.: (sxgrcH P.ts )

ASSo&E eHvg oHE Ho4ht t Peg TAHE 5t cs NCLeA1% PRO& ~C (HECT g OVT<6 r )JG4%LE'Sf

"~ Fr.~ Fa.:

FR. I f Fig I~~+i3y= ~ =as/klNo KRC.E S

4)A ":~i

g]ace ~= w (m<hSK I

v»= w.~~~~. (;~+„~Fj...)(z)bv.6LR8

= (i»+i»(')( s.|.~) 85 3/ Pg gp(

L5g'l

Fa. Faleg our'a

/VORRLEg 2

Alp - (~<jpg ~F1,„p)(l)(li b l3) .(>'Zq ~VOL)(~)(gJ,Q)P

e 82 07/~ 7 /jll LSy

a)Fiz.~ F6:iZ F6„/s,;

Fb,„~ t6,"., ~" ~ zo ~ L4-/ ~ppp aceg

<) p'= (Fb;„~ F'<;,')(x)(igloo)) Ce" ~~)(t)(cpu)8

= go/.5

jL ('Fb„'- /b..,),g(qi0~)„j —= zqgc) zH. 6 g

~p'0 Qp c.Cg

TYP

CAL BY

RG. No. lO-DBS

pt ULL FLoW LLJE,F OIL ~i TRAtHEk, eaom

Shoat of Sh?s.

8/26/>+

$ >f5,6-- (Fs,„- F h,„, ( ) ( .z - v)( )

4 go4%v6g

ag Fh,„F'k,„~:(F8 -Pk ) ~ ~ 'oy

~ ~Pc RRc.FS

Y=

Py - zg ')(/i,sc>) («y wry) (i)-(n.<cry

8w -44'

p/~+'Fb,„„> Fb +„) (is) (6iv vi|o)(iz)X pro Z4l 55 Z

Fb,.„";

= (F8,z ~b +,) ('i)(ir6~r) (7~> -~) (z) (vc6is33

s 82. 7f4 i / lu - L 4+

= (r-b,,„~ t h,+,)(i~) (go~+.) (i~))QRR Lc. 5 L

mL sV

FUI-l- t l.ow vila Ole Cl RAIIIER

RG N

C - IOOROLP

i8Sheet a f Shh.

8/2 ~/w-

c) [rooc FC.- Fc+'c+

F „-F „, KE I-l23

hlo+KLC. L

<)poor goALy, cesE. o>, p. II3:

Fy = p. = 6 —(+L-*) L=2iL a.-+ .

cC i)(F „" "«cJ6~5 IL,6 aj

c (2LIc- p~ ) = ~/~Fc ) I 2 ( I 3 it<i3'$

i3 6>

zs s,g

IN - LQ

c)

L

I. c,„- f c„„~+ go <a<6 $

>gr 6iS

ig(Fc,cr ~ I'c„„.,j

~76-" > I'IS ~ l ~6g '

(,vS) (ii)(3occ'3')IJ, 6ig

'>e ~u(2cr 3

~ oo~~icS

)g 6 yg I f o6 L S

= l2< ~~in ~'oor) l"(IC3 '4) 29'J3

«)~Coojh) I

+ F'cia "" adT ~~70 t~~~/OR+ (t 5

Fy CFc,„- F I )(>r'I (-'ll-3zl (i\(>I) 2Q3

IC 6 ' /0,6>5'c) Q z - i (F2c Itl co lb»( j~e 3II)-

l$gU~E~ FULL I ~4& L~4'C QlL R t k.Av<C

TYP RG. No.

GAL BY

mOuI C JO

z0I

I

z0Oz

I

0

+b) I'ly

+

C

gU~~ FUI.U FLDw LDEE OIL ~TRAI<KN

TYP RG. No.

CAL BY

CAMl.

c-P

Sheet of Shts.ZO

<2 Fa+ I4: rsvp///ulcc'b 5 0 .'

/'46„~ /6...:

Fi8a& //>'/98K' CPS'8 '3 7 P//g.''y

=R = 6' (gL -~) L= 23.('~)

( $ 7?.W 1I Q PI@

~) fiam /des', dgM:v, /.//>:

Ega.- gq.g =

pl< &»''&l 3!"Lcg

) p:5

+bw +~~aug Zfia L ~7g (..IH, »pJ .7g (iL 5 1l-l<)

3 Q.,(n/7,'6 Z p / 6' t )

- ~be-r «(s ~i-]i): NFa i~ LQ-

gU@ECT FvW. MW Lv K6 ~tL. Sl l~hlA~K.

Re. No.

CAL BY

L~GROlP

Shoot af Shta.>/

F] Fl~!!!!! N C, pgAHE!.A'TC to 0,

@5 p+ !!e,„+Hc,„(<Q(~el+«<3avf szS. 7

b) A y = (gFp ( is (!.t') xt i~<!'(!river!).3 —I'l7/,$ /8-C4~

8

Pp c. g c y (Q(yq) ply)+ plo~kt,c. 5

M~,„+AC,„ t>(al.o eP~X)

g (<~q l C (x)

\. I K. (l5.6>J5 p (! iL )(>ggi~)7.o 5 g, 7 aJ - l.4+

8

~c - Hc l.(l

Ac '„+

~>!! Rc „~ ii(<!!l-'B<) <ql. C <1 ) y ( I h)

/!! y = (i!(F~)(<!~ 6U~ (L) (!'l,!) (u'6'L!).8 8

) pg H,z + c~„< zt(991 3!31$= Ob>E'-~4'

Qe

FLow 4'u KE. Qlc Cli2AIHKR.

RG No

uu sv

C-I<

Sheet of Sos.22

Si23jXy

X0

8c,„, Wc„+

22) 'F+=8

c) p)(

: ~t,~) a (.1~)

2. (. F~ ) C~r.ecr) cg3.si )(iroc3')

grVc +COol- i3.(X3OF 3CO)

¹ Plo+ W (C$'= Jggp

X0Oz

0

6J CoNPCLAT<oN OF I RAHC feR'Peg /Mal.e LCO*bC'q

Fv.')Fy = Fg> + Fx< = ~F3.3+2.nx = 6Y$ 5 Lbg

~) Fy - Fy + p> = ~~ ~~py = all Lbg

zq Fy,'+ '+

I '5) < I ~ ~ F Yy - 2(LAPGJ f'4'fl > 4 - 0 "rc|

Fyi + Fy< "FYoi = &33 + 2.el+ i~i 8"- 'is 6:S

~F-= . '.f ~ "t F~ + F+>- fogy 3'/pv 3K',g "- By/,g Q~

6) F4 = FZ + I'+++ FK> = '663,3 0 /332 3P 5 %.=2'52VJ+.'I

~'l x:«q Ax = P1x„+ Nx~ = 62ov e sszcx = @733'j w-t5<6)8x: iitp + <x< = l2is+v63's. -" 8866

Q jiff;@ Ay= py> + p7y2 +/ye = l6ol p+il9yvi27ls=seUio.c6>s) Ny = Ny, + Ny~~ayz = no~.6+Shl~zosv',7 =/wf).3

63 ~~:a) 0+ = Pa, ~ I'1a 2 <isa~ - col.2 +iso3 t s22. = 23 e 6 3 m 26g-

iilfh + /fan t g< = aoxV,2% /363 + S'3S2'78/;2 IO 26S-/

CK ~ IAl

~ ~

FULL FLoW LU5E QlL S1RANEE'.

TYP RG. Na

gy RL5

OkOVF

Sheet Mof Shh,

8 gt/7P

Hj Dlo<'o&ENTAYloN OP TRANLF'EgpED goK+lc LaAgg '

gi-(

Fy, = +6%5, g Lb<, - Kll LI+

FY= +»&.S L4q, - «-~.e+Fh=+ 8'll.S L4~ '~- lying,g LIl

iH) 4 Ll)Bi/ IH c'4g ) 8 BC6 w-LL< . p

H Y + %(41 I tH LQ j IYl893nr 5,'~ X~AK + 2s sag'3 lN L4y~ "s 78/,Q N.t.g~ I

o

I

-',"U„~ I.ui- r" Luis; Q)~ =pi(p,i~i<<

RG. No

CAL BY

oooo C

Sheet Mof Shts.

82m O

TAHV. 5 H C I < I H ) Q 6 iE < 1 Y

J I >RikaH TAa aEl<KlC. Bt HbiNQ ~pi2C(t

c7 = I-o~4r n orNHC 5T'rc c'A d~d r~ Pc /r pc/~IWc.t 5 C/J ~/p g.Np+g, ( Rcvhirlgg

AT

l3 -2 P ]C -rl.dLJ 3= 3A',+ iu0 zz.

( P,Sg(~.<)

"/p)(l'L) g( I>S QJ(~)(gg-y/,p)

g~~ (>(, g)=+is4.

I'"'/ >

il",„~~ I uii )ioW LueE Qi STggiHZP

RG No Io -O 0S

CAL BY LSheet of Shta.

a ~s/~

3K GlcMH Fi'6< Q QH blH ro CpiEr i ic 6 t) v r 7~ Jl/o y~( g gQA ii6

'lT t~ f ~v 8 LQ SAT QE FcLLumtHQ l oAb~ Cog't~< lg vgaMWY LANK c4~5 R VATtV C $ 6 HQlfFQ Lgg Qg po ~g

++gal.,''SIi.e

l-CH P.>3 )

Rg H> = l>,6'(FV) i My= la,g ('l i Hi6$ + +Si 6 .- ~i +88, 6 iH -L)g

P$ py = i;r(ry) (~)('Fp)+ H)= n.S(~ii') «(e)(2~-LS.S') + iqiZS,>) — »oiler,iH--le

I/l. i'

9 Al LloÃ 6 + 87ol.l.,I '26op7

bt MPob 4uo~.7cr - —= -+'ll7o. 5 64/ <+ g Pg H. //H

V~o>(o Rc Sri>ess ~LuE To gogz<v Leppy

I) a = ~g YX~'f 7 g,~/uAREA /<(g, gg, L yg-

F~

- (io'- iS.Pl-)F}

CooihiHeh 6tH eH EiL STso sr@ 6 !

+ + l 0 +O = ~+~ +-cr +os'+cI

dye ~tie.i+f8,6+ u>5, 3 S <i~v, C+ 7S,q = ~S eo,~ jw.~s

l ~ P 5a +~~ ~+~1( l, I + Fc,~+ li'70,5 + w1 (

- —J1oG ~ l

+ HL46,7 /iH~Thai Q

, CAL BY

t us.s- fMsss Luge Ola STRA(HC 6

RG. N

NSIH Q WRC QOl L.6 T'Ihl I>1, 7HC I-DC 6E PRI AHP l 5'l PE'Sr ~STHE ~A~~ SHEI.~, OVC F ~ VERY CoI4EERVd

>IVY'R.AI4SFKRL64H~'%+I-6 ~DO f oN P.2.3 *g.E SHOm 8 OAQht'h 'SHEE, T, P.L'7> F POD PQIHT Oug,P, X5,

SIHCE:Pt< 5 H6AR IH'r6HSI t'r i f <ma((, [email protected] 2. F'ak7He CoebIH6 „l-R.e~S IOTGH(Irr uH beer-8 S~F7, P. ~7,LVI<i 'QE ll5 6 0,

z0I

-u n.8

~), = Sy($)+a~ 78<9./

m.= 5

"%IS~ 3

?.i7l(I'Nsgi

-~01,/

iIX84.7

t'ss7,2.

/ohio 9

.il KP9',7

ltz80,p n7't,7

t'337,l. -3i7/.I

los 0, Q -9o) t| /

p2I4' lo897,

-3»i I 7s-34,i

->oJ O',I 2 ~ ~1 4

loZ37,I >f96,X

Dc.

&29,7

'7$ 36,2

R 2.'19~ 7

0I0z

0

~IJ H 5AFET'r F8ct"u r2

$ (7oOD

il2t Y, 7~e

f. S.-" 9oaov P5/ <ftA 8 "4'2

A~- ~

Z,64

i LILI 7'I asm LaaP„(. UII b 7 fdlSIIILfc

L= 2 )77.S C"Tg.- )(x&t'o, I) (P.

te AS ~ li04 I ooo ~

Radial loof,Circ, Itaieant ~

Loilp Honiont a ~

'T ~ talon Houont,Shoot Load,Sheer Loode

1».C 1;~ lb.IIL I.".lan~ ~ lbsi e st/+lan Ib»

Vc ~lbVL T~VIb

2. Geoee ~Iris Poionerera

(0.4)$)—~ 0 e3Rin

'cL/2

OuOLAu

-XTabto 5-Computation Shoat for Local Strossos in Cylindrical Shellsc.b)

H2ga a~by

Cb Q g - //e,tro

P SQ c = /s.cisot) w = g.f'g

Mr

ROUNDATTACHMENT

Bu

2I Oueu Hrr

Vessel Ihicl I~ aa,

Atteclvaent rudiva,Yo ~ aot Iediv ~ ~

I IS)1r

5II~ I ~ ConceniI ~ Iion due I~I/~ ) Ieenbiano Ised, Kn

b) bondtnp leod, Kb ~r. 0

'HOT EI Ent ~ I oil 4tco valves in

~ ccoidence arith ~ ipn convention

uCL X/

CYLINDRICAL SHELL

,o L5

F~Flp

Sc

IC

Rood cvrvsalor

Hisd/Rie

Course ~ ebsolvt ~ valves ~ f~ II~I~ ~ Iid enter I~ @ii)I ~

Kb ~

Av AL Bu BL Cu CL Dv

7 89 '/ In'/I

STRE$ 5ES if lead a ~ OSSOIII ~ thor shove, teeerse ~ ipns shove

OL

y Fa

.I)/ g

Ag

, CIOBQ

2A

2 ~

14 ~ r'I ~ I

Hc/ Rut/i~IIS

sar/ RuffHIS

~HL/ N~>/7

Hier

HL/a ll

77 77SS7)S'7

0 /7$ C) /'7it 0 /7f0

3.'t cCH ~

lr I I'

Add ~Itehiotseur 4I aueueonoo~ IIS ~Ilsaaes, ~Ics P 4 I 5> X>+Tfa

/69I'0/69

sq 1 2.'l+'s

/oS

,Ol 2C

dA

2A

da

2O orI

Hs IrNe

Itc/RutllHs

Hc/Rural

Na

HL/RntPHa

IaL/ Reel)

He \ HL

HV~tg/ R I/)T

+

5

HtIIS ~ r ~ Si 2d It T0

Sheer stress duote lee ~Iuu Ils

Add ~ Iceluoiaollr 4I ouu vien~I K ateeaaia,na ~ (i = <>is')+L 6fs 6fs3 1.7S L7r 7 S'l» S6

+

5heor arrest 40I~ leod. Yc

5heor steer ~ duoto leod, VL

r aaSV

VLY

Add Altearolcatlr fer eurenenen~I sacer ~ iieaaea, r

COII~ IHED 5TRE55 IHTEHSITTI $

I) when ny ~, tr

hero lthe sitest I a it ~ lna'I IIOFI Cr

0 0 o 0 0 0 0

2l trhear 'O

Sl Wh d~anhoes uafko Htaa

5 4iseei ol $ $ ~ Ie ert IISI ~

)

5 t I'isis es)' ~ rrI ~I

~,

~ I

l0 ,Iifrrapra irt >bohr IIR

Qd~

~(

?

JDC, I

?~ 1 f\

~ / ~ eV p

p( ~

P Jorp('

F:;C,F

IUnF. F. L. 0.

strainer'C,ODf!,!i.!,

KD14 ~ p 3 ~ 42r(p G ~ G J/ 1 ~ (( 1 ~

("(L',:(T, V'", 'lL.: *

4>o 5/ 27uu ~ '2g $41v3 o >y 1 17

I ~ (/r' 025 g lo 3((', ~ ~ O.C4'p >2 o 35.// p F 'k A/ F 2 r'1 p i~ 4 D p F 2 ('/

3 ~ 3< ~ Ql, "~ 2; '025 g 1 ~ 35/

3'i, !7S(

.014

~ Vg

I

g

',(, '" ~

(.'.

~ (

I ~

Jo ~

~ .. 'iCn'I

o ~

~ r~:." ~ rF P=

l.r

r

537 " LAX=""':.:.

i7SO .'C.",= ("

"17 lu D":!= ~; ..7755 -.r.P v

'130F~X=

16981102SG543.51 q4if55

11630

( ~ ~

~I~ ~

I

~~4 '('d j'.

gczupg 8/'

gg//m Ni~Y'i~i ~/('((//(gzz>: rP4z vu~p~;< -.-..;

./Wy +~jvzcj~j'.,P/"-:".

'I

~ O,', '.Pq ~ 'I ~ ~

"~ I

Ot 4> ~AAT N(L VAICAW tATT. NO

iy, d/A'A'///.4 g5A'$

Pfd'dPAcwb

«~/St.'. "45~ah//

COP< WliVFg

z.y c xc DiZ3A/

~ t

lthe/aiA

~ ~

SO 5 4/A'C,'.:

VP/Z5

jg/$j/h/&/.F8-

/5'/5g.x5 4

ppPig

TlII ~

ms /coypu..

Ep/$j/h+800

j'/arV8-8s~ir-:r~~

~ "alp'vP s4L d~ $gAAi+HA'gdPM~ /0~~~+f /HA-XZg-Pdldd SuZ/i'd& ~.a <Crx~ag SPW/h/+g/-M IWEPg. 486 /O.P8$~ W==.k~/. F4uiAffbkj'~g fgKFEF7kfJ$7 8f- A@/ddt >'c.v'= 6I

jH''g

oF Pp'z$fwd- LEE'S 7d/CCoyyaORPa g~Z MzrV,"'7/4FFS j 8'/jl~g R/7ERlh'CT. SQAÃlhFRPafs j/d/

i~ ti~u;i5 dddE.; A$///E--SECfoal

~„&A/$g/4& i~<'/35Cg/h/6- Oh/

M)ygz>C ACE t'A'Cc&

VNIXSS DIN(ANISE SttC.DNICNSIONS ~NNAI\I

ID(CA, CEO«CIA(0 STVSOES1 VSAII TI~ I IIEA~ IlAihlll

S INAICNI1 C $ SCI AOVNotI($$II tAAAllllllVtf1 t(NOICVEAA

ANCLIAAITTAoh( VTIAOC tollIIONDON((NI1IclffSTVNII1I

I IlACC DCC (Calt tlACC DCC IS>SfS t(ACC DCC D(attlANCECSTIISCADLVN IAI~

alata(or $(C

tllltftaSA le AAA~ ACAA CONN(AS at ~ Er IIAC.1ENOYt SVAASSsipgic Sf"Pf

~ I tOIIION~

II INC(ON (ANION«Ohltlal IOCO«ONII

~ Ihlln I ~ IAII ~

NOAINVCION Ol «CAVO

slvNAN Ioo«n.vah tCS(ttfl

NOA MNO Oh ~ ~ AA\«Ohl INOI(h 1 ~

Sf//>JMEA /OVili& pOOIF: pWO ~ TIIISC501 Cotto ~ ATIOII

CCVtttftnt ~ CACIAC DIT. SVff1(0, A. 5,Ohh g g( CW~L Attn, g l$

'N "-"-"-VMJ cy ~ I >I I I

CalculationsSUBJECT-'/ 04KB/h(<-'C"c/4

2 u8< C~u ~rp~wEp~o'MMAK

Y'OBNUMBER

FILE NUMBER

SHEET 0BY

APP

C -/0OF

DA~DATE

Cr F F5 / 8) P //

FE /- Z Pid

('wC

F

(4 .TK4' ~l

A,<~ .OEEE WS/ rn

F

wein . r c'(4 T'c '4 F Acct Fc.FAF+cccccf

r Ei; cr cc I 6 Cd~~y FA +c,cAA~ 1o

l<.r&PPd~ CHAFE PF 5K PLATO. SWI r /

,'7c cr.'-~EEOC Fr>

r< /~7'~ ~E/ ~ 4&l

~~gf4(r r/8/EE g,g4

g IM

3 rrt Cr

(FA dcS

Qr

Oz


Unxt N

/8- J9


Bldg.CION'RO. Qiagai L~OL: Qc, Pi-,

Location

Installation dwg.. / Rev.


0-6" ~ g~

g~ g

g ~~ I

~ I~ ~

~ ~~ ~I ~~ ~

iV~'(%e)

~ g

5 g Type >Qol %5 Cfyp)

) I

sc& L

(',i''L


Reviewed 'by:

Date:Date: '2--') -/2

Qual. /Cert.

onstructz.on

Page 1 of 3h~

InspectorDate: l

Anchor Review Engineer

**12 CHP 5021-CCD-019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

C OR INSPECTION DATA SHEET

Give LMM'ic /i iUnzt

/2- 3zae

Bldg. Location- Ql -/13-A82



- Q/z


Reviewed by:Qu ./Ce t. Inspector

nstructxon Anchor Review

Date:

Date:

Date:Engineer

5

r3 ~A+ Q~"p )

G lc 5'<


~ ~ ~

0~ ~ II

~ ~ a i e

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~r

o ~

0 ~

s ~

RSR%RRKi%WW&W .

a a o o

mRSRIN WALLSwwweaarrm55555LSRLRSmmmRHE%RRHHRRHHELmRSmmELSLlIRSHRRELLLMW&M MWW

~ II II

0

'rr ~

s ~1

~JUL i

I ~~hl

sir ~ ~

*+12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


ipment No.: l-6 t- II3-8edded Steel Dwg. No.: ~lb


Dwg No.: l&3cÃV-//

Held IDT eSizeLen hCracks


Yes

Yesc3g9

Yes

3'lL

YesCRh

YesQtV

Yes

Yes Yes

YesHZP

Yes

es

Yes

Yes

Yes

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

'esNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Held T e Codes


5~7'PGR< QQac.~ - evhu s

Qg~ggg (gal.kl0%bb

0

0

Ecpxipment hase flexible: Cl Yes 8 Noons ruc won e

Date: cP-

Reviewed by:

V 'ed by:ons ruc ron c or evzew ngxneer

~/'a

. er . npsec or

Date:

Date: ~'~ ~ 'i


**12 CHP 5021 CCD 019ATTACHMENT NO ~ 1


ipment No.: - GT- i(3- 6

mbedded Steel Dwg. No.:PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

Weld IDT eSizeLenCracks

Lack ofPenetration

Yes ~Ys

Yes0

Yes

Yes0

Yes Yes

Yes @Ys

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Weld T e Codes


Porosity Yes0

Yes es Yes Yes65

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

SQPPoR 7 QRhc.k. - E'YFh~s

Qg~ggg $ g>c.atoll ~

fP)~ I

a

0'

O

Ecpxipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 Noons ruc son re Date:

Reviewed by:

V 'fied by:ons ruc son c or evxew ngxneer

ua ; er . npsec or

Date:

Date: 0 35 9"


**12 CHP 502 1 . CCD. 0 19ATTACHMENT NO. 1


quipment No.: /- - - Q3.

Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: A

PHYSICAL CHARACTERXSTXCS

Dwg No.: IB-8"zV-il

Weld IDT e

SizeLen hCracks

Lack ofPenetration

Yes

Yes

Yes Yes Yes Yes

Yes Yes Yes Yes

YesNo

YesNo

Yes'Lto

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Weld T e Codes

1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot:3 = Groove

Porosity Yes Y s Yes Yes Yes YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

50PPoR 7 QPhck c- EYRi~s

+KCT

Qg~gg+ (<xc,Kf4%'bb

Ecpxiyment hase flexible: CI Yes 8 Noons ruc won re

Reviewed by:

ified by:ons ruc ron c or evxew ngzneer

ua —. e . npsec or

Date:

Date: ~ r 5

y.'age

3 of 3Revision 1

~~j.~ ( riP 4021 CCD 019ATTACHMENT NO- 1


ipment No.: -97- I/ g

mbedded Steel Dwg. No.:PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

g .: ~gWeld IDT e

SizeLen hCracks


Yes

Yes

Yes

YesQRD

YescKRP

YesCgg)

Yes

Yes

Yes0

Yes0

Yes0

Yes

Yes

Yes0

Yeso

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Weld T e Codes


507'PoQ~ QQ&ck - EYRg 5,

~ I

OBS.RC.kC 7 (Hi(.k8%&:

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No Date:ons ruc 1on re

Reviewed by:

V 'fied by:ons ruc 1on c or ev1ew nglneer

ua . e . npsec or

Date:

Date:


Equipment No.: ( - G~-<6 - RSX~

~ ~

Tightness established by "Snug Fit"Tight:ness verified by:

Qual. /Cert. Xnspector

Comments: )pP

Equip ID: 1-HE-,13 Train: 12

Drawing No.: 1-5129A 1-5135

.ction: RI~

~

Equip Class: 21

Sys tern: CVCS

Equip Desc: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER

Building: CONTAINMENT Room: REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM, AZ 295


Normal State: Desired State: Power.Req'd: N


Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER

Mfr: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO

Model:

Elem. Drawing:

Wiring Drawing:

Power Source:

Walkdown: F G Relay Eval : N

Comp Type: HEAT EXCHANGER

XSO Drawing:

Location: ON THE CONTAXNMENT WALL SIDE OF THE RM

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: YesSheet 1 of 1

ID: 1-HE-13 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: CONTAINMENT Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: REGENERATIVE

HEAT EXCHANGER RM, ON THECONT WALLSIDE OF THE RM

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS It!DUSTRIALMANUFACTURINGCO

BASIS: External analysis

1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greaterthan the demand.

2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than thedemand.

3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to orgreater than the demand.

4. Attached piping has adequate fiexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom,, vertical tank.

5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

C~MMEE.'Q

SRT: George G. Thomas (SS A) and Tom Huang (AEP), April 13, 1995.l

Ref: Unit'1 and 2 Anchor Bolt Schedule (Drwg. ¹ 3073A-3 and 3073D), and Unit 1 8 2 Containment BuildingConcrete Floor (Drwg. ¹ 1-2-3207-23)

Relatively small exchanger (1600 Ibs) on two saddles in extremely high rad area.

Could not inspect anchorage due to it being hidden from view with insulation. Removal of insulation was notperformed because of ALARAconsiderations.

Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers. Due to large anchorage (four3/4" bolts) and small exchanger, the anchorage is acceptable by SRT judgment,

Evaluated by: Date:

iz /~ /~s

01/16/92PG. NO.539

SAFE SHUTDOuN EOUIPHENT LIST (SSELMP)

FUHCTIOH: ESN

Equipment Class: 2'I Train: 2

Eeiirment IO: 1-HE- IBE Drawing Nunbert 1-5113 I-51C4

Svstem: COHTAINHENT SPRAY

Enufo Description: EAST CONTAINHENI'PRAY HEAT EXCHANGER

Rui lriing: AUXI L IARY Room: E CONTAINHENI'PRAY HEAT EXCKAHGER ROOII Elevation: 609

wnr~l state: Desired state: Power Required: N Sort: u,

Siaoorting System Drawing Number:

Required Interconnections and Supporting Components:

fetv Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Hin/Opt: HIN

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

4l ias Number: Power Train: NA

Cnmcx nent Served: EAST COHTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER

wsnufacturer: YUSA Node l:

oanel:

EIem Drawing: H/A wiring Drawing: N/A

cower Source: N/A

ualtdown: F Relay Only: NO

Comoonent Type: HE

ISO Drawings:

Detailed Locatian:

.DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HE-18E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: EAST CONTAINMENTSPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: E CONT SPRAY

HEAT EXCHANGER RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: YUBA(VERTICAL)





4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom,vertical tank.

5. A ring- pe foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

C LL 0 T?

~C)JJV~N$

SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.

ery well engineered support structure.

There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the 4 quadrants. This takes theoverturning loads on the exchanger.

Bottom support (at about the 1/4 point of the exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below) is aheavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations. These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviouslywell engineered.

Qualification data (Yuba Heat Transfer Division Calculation 69-G-226) indicates an analysis to the design basis.Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected the Heat Exchanger is adequate.

Evaluated by:

cQDate:

> /I g

/8- ~ - fiAttachment: Pictures

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HE-18E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: EAST CONTAINMENTSPRAY HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: E CONT SPRAY

HEAT EXCHANGER RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: YUBA(VERTICAl)

ELC3XKE>

BASE GUSSETED SUPPORT TOP SUPPORT

P. O. BOX 3158 ~ TULSA, OKLAHOMA74101 o (918) 939.2201

December 7, l971YUSA ItlOUSTA!SS, lNC.

American Electric PowerTwo BroadwayNew York, New York 10004

Attention: Mr. R. A. KadlecMechanical Engineering Division

Subject: Indiana & Michigan Electric CompanyDonald CD Cook Nuclear PlantContract 1241Containment Spray Heat ExchangersYuba Job Number 69-G-226

,C~~~ F'LA~>ORD - grD f,gpss

~rCTIDNE~~GtNV;.qDATE

~LEANT LIPEy~MEDATE TO PLANT0 NOH pERHAHENr

HlNQfUMg~~N~

Gentlemen:

(6) 'four Seismic Stress Analysis for the subject gob.Qe are enclosing six (6) copies o our

b"" 9 1971. written by your Mr. A. Sherman, request'ingji refer to a letter of Novem Qr~ ~~ ~ ~

a' suit we have completely rewritten this a y *additional clarification. As a resu

as Rev. 2.

nts at our earliestPlease return one ( ) copy in i(1) d'cating your approval and/or commentconvenience.

Uery truly yours,

YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORATION

B. F. FormanDes ign Engineer

BFF:dccc: Mr. A. Sherman

Main FileEng. File

/U JI

1

Y\/."!< .!!::/s7 1 8 N"SF 0!'lV I S I Ql~>U3/s l(vov ~>ales, Inc,

Seismic S trc. s Anal vsisIndiana & Michigan Electric Company

Donald C. Cook tiuc lea r PlantContract 1241

Containment Spray Heat ExchangersYuba Reference 69-G-226

Page 1 op

Rev. 2

S tresses in the support ring structure resulting from the operating load on supports, thc

forces due to seismic acceleration and operating pressure will be investigated using the refer-

ences listed below.

The support structur'e consists of two 4" x 2" rings encircling the exchanger together

with a 1" thick wear plate and q" shell plate. Refer to Page 5 for vertical support details.

The following stresses will be calculated:

1. Longitudinal bending stress due to shell acting as a cantilever beam and

loaded with horizontal seismic force.

2. Bending stress in ring structure loaded with operating wt. and vertical

seismic and horizontal seismic force acting at center of gravity of

exchanger.

3. Circumferential and longitudinal stress in shell due to pressure in shell.

The period of vibration'is determined using References 1 and 2 below:

l. "Introduction to Matrix Method of Structural Analysis", by Harold C.

Martin, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966.

2. Yuba Computer Program to determine loads and reactions in structures by

the direct stiffness method per reference 1 above. The program also/

Icalculates the natural frequencies of structures. See discussion on

Pages 10 and 11.

"LIU/iI SCAT TRANSF!. R 0!Vl"IQl':.'OA

IYOUSTalas, INC.

(' .. 'u <g u / l~ U 4 Page 2 ciRcv.

k

~

~W = 94.4 Total Operating Wt.

<Vertical,Acceleration Av = .17

*Horizontal Acceleration AH = .3

A = 10/12 Ft-

B = 18/12 Ft.

C = 9.42 Ft.

D = 3.46 Ft.

E = 6.92. Ft.

(See Fig. 2 Page 5)

6 = 45'k

HF = W x AH = 94.4 x .3 = 28.3

VF = W x (1 $ A ) = 94.4 x 1.17 = 110.4

2 PE Sin 8 = VF D Sin 6+CHF

. 2 P x 6.92 x .707 = 110.4" x 3.46' .707 ]9.42' 28.3

P = 54.9 k (Vertical reaction at one support)

'Zhe following forces are horizontal components acting normal to the rings. Tvo

forces act at each support - See Fig. 2 Page 5.

A x P '/12' 54.9kRl 2/3B x 2 2/3 (]8/] 2 ) 2

22 . 8 k (Force due to moment caused by ver tica 1

reac Lion)

HF/2 Sin 01= 4x2

HF Sin 6hg = 4x2 = 2.5 (Force due to moment cuased by horizontalk

reaction)

28.3 /2 x .707 I= 1.25 (Horizontal shehr in each ring)

28.3 x .707k

4x2

".,I-:l7 Tf? ANSF ER DIVISIONYVOfi'IIIDVSTAICS,II6c.

U i' (.' iPago 3 o

~

Rev. 2

h ~ hR= l~, 1 I 2 -"228'k ~125k>25kI

= 26.55 k, 24.05 k (Total horizontal force acting normal to the ringSee Fig. 2 Page 4)

Using'' 2" Rings and the loading "R" shown in Figure 2, calculations were

made to determine stresses.

For stress in rings see Page 6.

Stress in Shell(Due to HF Acting at CG)

kM = 'F x C = 28.3 x 9.42' 12 = 3200 in k (Moment in Shell)

Section Modulus Where d = outside diameter of shell, in.

(d4~~= .049087

R

d 4) di = inside diameter of shell, in.

30 3= 1426 ill43300

M 3 200.000 in lbStress =

S=

. 1426 2245 psi Shell Stress

The above calculations were'' based on the horizontal & vertical acceleration

given in your specification 42373-NK.I

The accelerations used to obtain stresses correspond closely to those obtained

by calculating the natural frequency of the exchanger see Page 9 for values plotted

on the response spectra curve it Floor EL.633.I

The natural period of the exchanger as obtained from our computer program and

based on loadings shown on Figure 1. Page 4 is 1.275 Second (maximum).

~('

~ ~

v' y V) jI (. I, ~,.r.. Q," i ~

k~~ 'I

C

Hr- Wrr7r&C. C

0l(.C..

C

Og

t Qa'

0

(I)4

('Xl+

7~-'ll rt~/rr 'g" t:f

c 5i

Hcg

++OOO

c'as".

I

I

S+7W 7

SS r/7u4< Sr' . ,r

/r

Or~ („K,:7~/ -~o'

l(Q

Phoo6+~7'nA

.~zSWa I: ~WC>QOyZ'7.

l

II'LVO

I.iV6i};:,.A VS!M7 '1 I..'.~ I."i:.."i'-FL Ci~e~f'O'LCAVlIf.u;.-'iI~

< 11'L"kic=zG ir7S~

~ rm

s. cvvvIIIIrIIvoI Y~i:A COI:."r~iIufTZC> l!:Dl1~Tl'.lI.".. ll!C. (

3515 Ol 'V .ON lmAO. 1'Ut 'a. 0! LAf<Q1.1AI IAVI:4 1%.".t 0 0 0~ ~ ill h ~tr 'I'A ltWLV

0Vo'C.

ez-g- ~=a -/

'

'l

l ~

~ L

r, ~

~ J 0 '4 ~ ~ v 4 4 dA~r I V J A U

%Iran'

llha ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~

QI\ '':j. I'. !J:;. 4, 4 aI

YUUh HLAI1'AANSF 613 Ol VISIONYVOA IMDVSTAIFS, INC.

STRRSS I!; Rl;;CSReference "Formulas For Stress 6 Strain" by Roark (See Page 7)

Miome'nts in Rin

Pa e Go.."Rev. 2

= 17'

- ~ =28'os ()k = .9563

Cos e - ~ = .8830

R ='26.55 k r = 31.5"26.55 k x 31.5"

2

'MR = - ~3- R

MR' 5 R r

r (-- Cote)1

e

( si e1-)e

=418 in k

M'0 = 4 R r ( . — -)1 1

sin e e

R(Cos o( 1)

Sin e e

MR = -418 (—1

.7853

= 418 ('8830.707

1) = -113.8 in k (Moment at load due to load)

1) = -10.4S in Ic (Moment at R'ue to load at R).7853

Q Oc. plH5

418 (—— ) = 59.4 in k (Moment at 0 due to load zt R)1 1

.707 .7853

418 ( — } = 33.4 in k (Moment at 0'ue to load at R). 9563 1

.707 .7853

I = 59.51 in4 S59. 51 = 14.9 in3

MR (Total) = (113.8 + 10.45) = -.124.25 in k

M0 (Total) = (59.4 p 33.4) = 92.8 in k

Moment of Inertia of Rin.3 3

1= 12 + 12 q L 8x 22+22 5m2 x 4 15 x 1.5

1

T

.752]QF.

~ll~ ti

RADlVSMax. Stress (at load)

-124250 in. lbs.14-9 in3

Mcor I

-124250 in. lbs. x 1.5"

8,350 psi (in 4" x 2" ring)a

22.5 x .75 8 x 3.5CG = 2 x 4 $ 1.5 x 15

59.51 in 3,140 psi (in shell)

5II

Y'J13fs r'L;ATTftAl"SFCR DIVISrQNYVOA INOUSTAISS, INC.

isa.„re: o',

Copy Taken From

"Formulas For Stress and Strain" by Roark

Tauu: VIII.—Fonstur~s ron Clncof,*n Braes win Ancnns

Bf'n 2'n Vn Bf, T, and V arc positive xvhcn as shosvn, negative ivhcn reversed. Allapplied forces and couplesarc positive svhcn as sirocco, negative svhcn reversed. The follosving notation is ctnploycd: g w niodufug~ ofelasticity (lb. ppr sq. in.); f ~ moment of incrl,ia bf ring cross section (in.'); 1V or F as shovrn ~ applied load or

I y/~ reaction (lb.); w ~ applied load (lb. pcr lin. in.); l: ~ freight of contain'd liquid (lb. pcr cu. in.) ~ ~ si« ~~i

' ~ cosa;s ~ sin 0,c ~ cos0;n ~ sinO, c ~ cos O; p sruti,q ~ cosp. Allanglcs~uradians,distanccsinNI ' 2 inches, forces in pounds, moments in inch-pounds. +D, or +D„rncans incrcasc, -D, or -D„means decrease

in diamctcrs. +drR means increase, -aR means dccrcasc, in upper half of vertical diameter. C

TI trtn VIII.—FolMULAs l'OR ClncvLAR Itngcs A'Ho Ar'cncs.—(Confinucd)

fzalin ruppxe andcow numM

Formulas for tending moment II,eireumfere rfsl 4ensfon 2', rsdtst shear V at a u!ar dieesneo r from toirnm o ting and for Vi.shan't in Lairosut drnmeeer,and D,. change in versiesi dismerer

f fdK under sny numbx of equal radialforem cqusay spsadI Il/

IO'~./,0' I ' JlrZ(b.-. 0

Ilr

(a ~ eton ~ I) It'-frI!(---):hfag+If~ rfP/ xat o,h,dd,l „ /u l /l

c)" 4s e)r ~ - 'Ir eot C at toads.

l

ludisl disrtseement ef each load foist ~ -@L (y+,e2n.L, (2 2 )lrlfs/2 1 'X .

ftsdisi dupfae me t se r 0, 2I, In, ere.' C- fnsrsrdgal (C ~ ss)

htss —hf ~ --frP(- —eor I}sr each loadl /l

(o

. VU/i II::Al 'I IIAisSICI:IIOIVISIQNYVOA ftaovSTRIES. tNc.

SUlMARY OF STRESSES

Combined Lon itudinal Stress

s r xLongitudinal stress due to pressure = 2t - .2 p

ghere r = inside radius of shell, t = shell thickness & p = design pressure

2x 5" .2 x 150 psi = 4,470 psi

Combines stress = pressure stress + bending stress (Page 3)

= 4,470 + 2,245 = 6,715 psi h

Combined Circumferential Stress

r xCircumferential stress due to pressure = - .6 pt ~

Combined stress = pressure stress $ bending s tress (Page 6)

= 8,910 +3,140 = 12,050 psi

Shear S tress

s

'Xhe shear stress in the shell can be ignored since the ring structure takes the load

in bending.

ggllalii5alll

gmgg~~gg

gggg~g55I~SR

~ g

) ~

'«i'..cc'ice!i

'j'his procvc(ct7 uses the direcL sti.'.i'(.ss Ur Lilod as si:o-:n b> Ii. C« I.'artif! jn

s';AL') i;( f'jnL'hlods ol. Stl.uctul:al tlnal)'8).s ~

l

Xn the case or: "- been a:ith a distributed load, the load is d'vide(. into f an...

pOint lOadS SpaCed alOng thf: Laealf}.

g i:/f't.

L = len('th

The problenl (!ould be appzo>:ifvated asF

F F F t:'

p I'I~I/('«1) )<he) e H = 'fao ~ pk Load l pints

Fro}fr here t >e program calculates ti:e nov>'«ts at each loari point and th

reactions at each load point and the reactions at each support. Also, (:ith the

input:, the natural fzcque;.cies may be calculated.

'Co find tl.e natural fze(Iucncv tnc stiifness:".atri>: Sound above is used in r.:;:"'.

the sa.,~a @ay ..". spring constant in a vibrating spriqg and'rf".ss systera. For a

spring

F = "IZ hlF=- —. X

I oo= -g: buL for

4„8)'S teal rrC4 — }IV

or (W' —);;-0Z [CDEY.

v l ~ «I I aa «a ~~w vhv J~ N ta p J AIf~

an of;cillilting$}}c/ is in radians/sec

'iV = g/~phd'

fa}O i ('l«l «I««I««Illa lc II I pre ~ cly cflllcl Yrvracflr I)!ci~ ivr., '«ld I~ rc I lc. Lc r ~ >'.d

da'd I ~ 4 IClc ~~ I \I l J ~ l, I «Ir I IC«C l ~ Cr 4 l val ~

f,l ca Crr.rr fr.V« ll«C l f« r V«.lcf Il I~ CCCC«l ~ .C«l,

(V~ ra} ~ t C«f ~ VII(«CCC I'I~ 4f CICrJl Cl ll 0 l C« lI IvrCf ~ I («IVIIICA

Ercq ..- ~/Z g rye le«/ccc

~«««4«rv vva~ v v J cv IAa v~ C«C.C:

aa«va««v~««a ~l avv4 «wav ~k a«t J 1 ~ I J«ae ~ ~ ve«A4U

1

Ca'vr v

Ca<T I

YUB.'. i,'.'}':YRI=.S. lNC.

I'(:f '>:.. (:l:.l '.ll!!I!r 'I:I(«.::}I(;« f.f I'«l "l<I!

Fo our case F =: 1', aa! Ia "r'e 1 1S 'Lh<.: S t itllfeS fr i'eai tr ) .". I

"1 1

r-;

F f.t

point loGds O'Ad are the displace.~. nt.. at the point loads.

p wt+ 2)e vllere H =- hV

or "11 )i X —. KZ, where X.. 2

or (1' H tf ) X = 0, since'tlie displecer.ents "re not nll equal to Zero

the deterninate of. thc 1!atria (1; + H X.) aust equal Ze.o. ThenW'=~7'nd

P -„—..cycles/sec..W2 A

4ev e vPLRv ~ vev v '

lie.alt -%Let 4tnvle.g> 11 11 a fena till CI

Ievbt ftnhatae fteaetfCte ~ ~ hV e ~ I Vl IC 1 V 1 ~ eV

Ovnta IC ~ 't vlf~ tet Iti pCII~ hOf I ~ Cr I . ~ ge'r pre ~

ehntt Othtt It.nn Il.nt fn ~ a haah il ea tr'l~ 'IeCCelf

f at hlahnef ~ vllhnvl It.et C v 0 ~ 4 tvl Cf IvLC tta 41

Tent.liat fraeetecee

~ ' ve vvvearteaa et,

C cate.

.at r.

k4it4A a ~ ra acr A'L~ v re A ~ e pv JNrv vh eva e~> dva vlNkbr

' '' '' " ~

''/I4+ je 1 ~ I' . a '~ I' ~,aa ~ '$ I I ~ (I pt(Z ~ ~

fJLeefw a ~ e s'a i ~ ~ af e ~ aa ~ I Ij 'at J lw ~ Vl ~

Y U'5r 1r"i~hIS'1 f1'L: lflC

t (: tr'Or'a wl aell I lf. 'era i.'I' etc!II ala I'I'I. I L'h.:.4 i

e'a' rreaeaealwre ~vie 'AAwAA,ave ee r ~

TITI.Ir

0'cela".

XNSTRUC LIONS

FOR

XNSTALLATXON, OPERATXON AM) MAXIQENANCE

or

SHELL AM) TUBE IIEAT EXCHAlxGERS

FOR

AZRXCAIT ELECTRIC POHEP, P'HVXCE CORPORATXOH

XIIDXAIIA8: 11XCHXOAD ELECTRXC CO&ZiQK

DONALD C. COOK IICL"P3PL~I'HXT

1 A|lD 2

GUSTO."KR' PURCHASE ORDER IMBIBER

Contract 1243.

YUBA HEAT TRANSFER DIVISION JOB NUIIBER

69-G-226

DESIGNED AM) BUILT

BY

YUBA HEAT TRANSFER DXVXSXON

TULSA, OKLAHOa~M,

VV'I: D HHQ,'I7 ll i;ZQ,I.JGL-;.2 L'3i"'7J"I'~"'~I.GP. O. OOX 3158 ~ TULSA, OKLAIIOMA 24101 ~ 19161 939 2201

EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION SHEET

;,Qg

,/69-G-226

YVGA INOUSTAIES. INC,

CUSTOI 1E R American Electric Power Corn. OATF.

CVST. NO.

9-18-7042373-P(IY

PROPOSAL NO. OG-898-64PLANT LocATIQN Donald C ~ Cook tguclear Plant

SIZE 60-355 TYPE CFU POSITIONVertxca'ontainment

S ra Cooler EA"1ITEMi NO

200 sHELLs PF FourNO. OF UNITS One SHELL ARRANGEMENT PARALLEL ENGRS. TEB

PERFORMANCE OF ONE UNIT

10

VAPOR

LIQVIO/HR.

v.- /KA.

FLVIO CIRCVLATEOB TOTAL FLVIO ENTERING lHR.

SH'ELL SIDE

Lake Hichigan Ilater1 650,000 - 3300 GPI~I

1 650 000

TVOE SIDE

Boraced NaOH I ater1,600,000 - 3200 GPif

1 600 000STEAM /HR.

'NON CONOENSAGLES /HR.13 FI.VIO VAPORI?ED OR CONOENSEO /HA.14 STEAM Coia/OENSEO

15 GRAVITY.I,IQUIO16 VISCOSITY-I.IQVIO

MOLcCULAR.V(EIGHT VAPORS

=/HR.oAP I

CP.

16 SP. HEAT-GTV/=(aFFNTHAL.PY-GTV/='G

TEMPERATURE IN20 TEMPEAATVRE OVT

oF 76141. 5

167.5100

21 OPERATING PRESSVRE P.S.I.A. P.S.I.G.

IMPER OF P S tWO

24LOCITY

pRcssuRc ORopF ov'LING REslsTANcE

F TJSEC.PD. t

.001 .0005

3.710 at.LowEo l,4 c" t.c. 10 aLLowEo 4. 0 cat.c.

26 HEAT EXCHANGco-G.T.UJHR.22'RANSFER RATE SERVICE

107, 850, 000375

M.T.O. ~+~V-~OF. 25 ~ 6

29 OESIGN PRESSVAE

CON STR UCTION-EACH SHEL L

150 300GO TEST PRESSURE

DESIGN TEMPERATURE

A249 TP316

Steel

I a.t. 225oF 200

No- 1150 U

450200

0 0 5/8 IN 20 GwG.AvG.gt+;vaLLLENGTH 29 7 PITCH 'l3/l 6« ~ > 7LYA((

INOM. I. O. 60«o. o.'QS SKELI. COVER IINTEGRAL Qp<~~~QItS+26 CKANNEL. 304 S ta in less Steelo? TUBE sHEETs sTATIONARY Steel 6 Overlav

F LTG. KO. COVERCHANiiIEL COV E R 304 S.Steel ClaFLOATING

GB BAFFI.Es sEGME'(TAL Steel P ITCH lt CUT F I.OW

QG BAFFLE-LONG Steel IMP'T. Stainless Steel40 TYPC JQINTs sHELL . Bo1 ted TUBES Bolted41 GAsKETs-sHELL S.Steel Clad4? CONNECTIONS-SHEI.L-IN 18

CHANNEL- IN44 CORROSION ALLQIVANCE SKELL SIOB l./8

FLTG. HO cHaNNEL S.Steel CladOUT 18 SEAIES

oUT t,2« SERIES VETUBE SIOE

FULI- OF lvATEA 94,4004 HTS EacH sHELI ANO GUNQI E 60 000 GVNOLE ONLY

EMARKs:— Edd current cesc tubes.Seal weld tuoes.Full suo ort olace a U bends.

E"REQUIREMENTS-as«E 1968 Sect.I IC Tube Sec= 8 STA'.I~IYEst 6~Y TEMAcLAss

JUL 11M~4'i(/7I'~C-

7//f

YQBA HEAT TRANSFER CRPORATIONP. O. BOX 3158 ~ TULSA, OKLAHOMA74101 ~ (9181 939-2201

July 9, 1.975

American Electric Power Service CorporationTwo BroadwayNew York, New York 10004

Attention: Mr. Cherry

Subject: Indiana & Michigan Electric Co.Donald C. Cook Nuclear PlantContract 1241Containment Spray Heat ExchangerYuba Job Number 69"G-226

Reference: Seismic Report for American Electric Power

Gentlemen:

Confirming our recent telephone conversations regarding,our SeismicAnalysis, our 69-G-226 vertical containment spray'heat exchanger for t'e-Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, the natural period of vibration is.108 sec. rather than .787 sec. as stated in the report.

Please note that the .108 sec. perio'd will result in lower accelerationsand stresses than those in the Seismic Report.

If we may be of further assistance, please contact us.

Very truly yours,

YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORAT N

WCN/etcc:. Mr. R. H. Shaw

Mr. T. R. HarringtonMr. Bill NewlandMain FileEngineering File

WiXliam C. Newland, Jr.Design Engineer

,ALL AGREEMENTS CONTINGENT UPON STRIKES, ACCIOENTS ANO OTHER CONOITIONS BEYONO OUR CON

o'LLC NO TRACTS ARE SVLIECT TO APPROVAL SY AN OFFICER OF THE COMPANY. QUOTA'TIONS SUMECT TO CHANGE YYITHOUTNOTICE,

712

"VI

U-TUBE EXCHANGER

REMOVABLE CHAN."$=L AND COVER

TOO PASS SHELLEVEN PASS TU" E SIDE

TEMA CLASS 'R'ONSTRUCTION

VUGG V~CaV Vna,usvt-:v. D<vrorotaYVOA INOVSTAI4S'NC ir~ ~~

TYPICAL CONSTR U CTIONFEATURES OF YUBA TYPECFU EXCHANGER

0

e'%f'

l~~l

IT

~>V"

g(y( /

rr:o /re% ror«o ~

,t/ %'

,0

gg~~t

a~/ SOAP

got 4 ~

Ctootorr ooogoo«/7

Lf.ooo

trI

w ooo«« to lo tv«or ItCoo«rtt /~tr raW/

rtoooota

o ~

I /k

C.(iPICC tS /«/«JtrfCC

~ ao «orto«/tt .4 tp«r~.o J ot Ct o /%it

ct. ~. toI ooh>

to/I/~A'too J

.Sc r r/root BP gCooo toIltoo.

YVSA lQAT TRAPGFA NYIQIOIITIBIAWKANlWoo,poC,«o, ~

oC

rttr~ oo too r« /~ ro fr&rot.rtrrtce ar o«rrro o/II«o to«tD«4ro«oorrI rw to«««r ~r// r/~rtl'; ~ '. It 4'oI

Co

Component Zo. t H 6-(8 6 Class

Any particular area the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attontion to?Yes No (If yes, check items that apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor Diameterhnchor Spac:fag ~Anchor NumberAnchor EmbedmentAnchor Edge DistanceAnchor GapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack


If there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicableitem and explain.

l.2.3,

Hardvare Maintenance Type DiscrepancyDrying Up&,te Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy .

Others

Condition:

Actions Taken:

t4 odC

Prepared By T. naos > <3 7Z

~~l4 Vrxr'441.V O.ulrATTACHMENT NO- 1

Equipment No.


.ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET

Avx E.c. bog'-g uUnxt 0 Bldg. Location

t 'Z-) 5 A -0, I 2-39I >- J 1- H ~8f


1 (a~)

~ ~zVI

0 ~

r

(AO'-0"

It(OlAl(P 4ICHI(

tahiseg

MAR 2g

A g flQ)l~ 4,

i'lfPOi.'rdnY

LORY. T

~ ~

4 or>'0 '

gp ) ( ~

ELGu. i"4 Loose)6 NGSg 4

4 ~V ~

r

Drawn by: Date:Date:Verified by:

~

~ ~Q al./Cert. nspectorReviewed by: Date: 8 <>83

Construction An or Review Engineer


**12 CHP 5021 CCD01'TTACHMENTNO.

CHOR INSPECTION DATA S EE, ~ ~<T.5'PR~ %.6- R~g0

0'ldg. Location


Anchora e Arran ement SketchEquxpm'ent No.

kg+ p oiT, 4lh5~,HMT(STCAM)

Sl'„. „"„=~ ~ ~~ J ~', ik I ~ g Q

2S 1995

'ngr

lp~ 4'Fg

I8 W$g

ig

4'rawn

by: T'~ Lmt-mm,a Date:Verified by:~~ ~~

Date:Q al./Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: Date:Construction An hor Review Engineer



Unxti<- '39IS S I-HG- I55

Ecpxxpment No.Installation dwg. / Rev.


NCHOR INSPECTION D TA SHEE, ~ WvT SPRR'/ ~ 6- RooI4A '~. Ct. Voq-o"

Bldg. Location

IIIIIIIIII

I'

g~

fpllc CE 'cIVV 'i.< ~ ii

MAR 2g the~

IIII

IIIIIIII~l PLP,g Ul~ .

(B e.Oe t mme.886<I)

7.W ..U Date: 3- I'i<~

Date:Drawn by:Verified by:

qual./Cert. InspectorReviewed by: Date: 3-aS-'f>




Unxt12-39 lb A

Installatl.on dwg. / Rev.


ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEE~! . pg q

~ 40NT 5 PRA'/ H Q- Pop~Bldg. Location

A 1- ~ - (QE.Equipment No.

6I &s~/sP!

9 24,+jg~p4.

>40 50!.T,! o~< —~Wh5~, NOT(~r. 5)

SE. CT. 'A,-A S'ECT. 5-8

2/g+'/g ~pg)

!3

~h.~4gw)

3'/2 xg x>/yx 8'jf(p~) 4

c 4-

IO

ACCT,'c-c

I t<0!*!!A V.!,"'l!"t::

WOc",Kl!":" C~

MAR 7 Z l~~'BCT0-D

Date: ~-~~-'~Z

Date:

&~L4nln.Drawn by:Verified by:

Qual. /Cert. InspectorReviewed by: T- Date:

Constru son An hor Pevxew Engineer


*+12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Un t> AInstallat on dwg. / Rev.


ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA S EEw~t- zpn.~ w c - a<p~

Bldg. Location0 I- l-h=- —ISI:

Equipment No.

p l/+ +p~i ~ ~ll5/ cp 54l T w 1TH lo4. MHh&%9RHOT

IB «/zX g"

I~ I/a x Wy (STI~a Wmeg+~ I/2 R)

StHM K OH CIT~ Se6 Or RR HEe I~ VO7 S~WH

SECT. F-E

(RW)0~ g

p lI

0 I

~:>l ~ !i>i'cV. CQpy

MAR 2Z 1S95

-LCRK,T

5CcT. F-F

T AuL4esp Date: ~-' -'(~

Date:

Drawn by:

Date:hor Review Engineer


Verified by:ua ./Cert. Tnspector

Reviewed by:Constru son

~ ~

~ ~ II

~ ~

~ ~i

~ +

~ ~

s ~

~ s ~

~ - ~

' L I W 1

KR~~~RRKR~ + ~ ~

~ ~ ~ v l ~ j

- mmwmmlHmmm mml@mmR1mmRI

e ~

mRSWRIRRNSNKlMWWWWW&W5%mmRMSRRmmRQmmmRRRRR%l%

~ 0 I 0 Cs 4 ~MW&MMWW&

~ r~gs r

W

0

tW - ~ ~


Dwg No.: )~- S ))SA- 0

Dwg No.:Equipment No.:Anchor type NR)GC t.lfeR. Dia: >/

Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 5 TorqueTorque Nrench No.: ~~+ ~) ) Cal. Due Date: C 04 3

Tightness verified? 5.Yes 0 No 7- '~'~'<~'i Date: "-< )-')3ons ruc ron

Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8 No ''.""""<»"l: Date: 3 '- l3

Bolt IDCaps

Anchorlen th

l 0 tL lK )'5

84 sq s4"

l S' lo CommentsGETw&&nJCoNC:Q L

Protrudinglen th

Embedment

Boltri /S S/j'/II"tp g"

'"/sl)

( 3y 653

~4. ~/g

Concretecondition Cj OQQ 0 00$ G,OOg g o 0g (WOOLD 40OP'oop Coop

Edgedistance

Anchors acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

+(l ~rr gl l

/eI m&S OK olc. oL

g 9/)@ 4Il

Q II

OE Og. hJUT tsSl~"T&lclL.

Comments:

Verified by:q a ./Cert. Inspector

Date: +Reviewed by: T-

Const ct ogI II)IrNh tfil~rIGr'll I <Wr;

'rYODK)AG COPY

y;qB 23 1993

Pago 2 of 31-Revision

Date: 3- a3- qg

gu4 J. ~ <i', gggATTACHMENT NO.

ANCHOR INSPECT ON D T S~

~

~ ~

Equipment No.: I—1+6-< SG

Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:HYSICAL C CT RIST C

D g No.: I- Bhi5A-a

Weld IDT e

SizeLen hCracks

Lack ofPenetration

3|ltp

Yes Yes0

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Weld e Codes1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 = Groove

Porosity Yes YesNo

YesNo

Yes'o YesNo

Yes YesNo No

R&.os 8 TYpLce io<+71()N< AAB g~6 pg, sTR084 R ~~T-' -re-'tz

INGIABO '<tSITe 0=<"

VIP

LEACH + r

Equipment base flexible:Reviewed by:

Qns rucOps'QyVerified by: ua. e

Q Yes Q. No 7 43 Lw~<w-uons c 1on re

xon c or evzew ngxneerov hy'.

npsec or

Date: 3- <"

Date:

Date:


S 8 A CEPARTMENTCONTROL.LEO DOCUMc8'l

COPY NO.


Ul',TRASONIC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO.: > If( REPORT DATE: > '+ lZ REQUEST NO. l IA.

IDENTIFICATION

Unit C hlEComponent l AC.l FItemMaterialOther

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/NFreq./Diameter 6Reference Standard C. KeCouplant/Batch No. i~ cMA6t= o".

'3e

TEST DATA REMARKS

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


IEVEI: ~ DATE:

E.EVEL:~ DATE: 5


01/16/92PG. MO.SC5

SAFE SHUTOOMM EOUIPHENT LIST (SSELMP)

FUNCTION:

Equipment Class: 21 I'rain: 2

Equipment IO: 1-HE-3C-HE Drawing Number: 1-5135A

Svstem: CCM

Equip Description: NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP.26N OUTBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER

Building: AUXILIARY Room: NORTH SAFETY INJEC'IIOH PUMP ROOII Elevation: 587

Normal State: Desired state: iPower Required: M Sort: lf,

Suoonrting System Drawing Humber:

omvired Interconnections and Supporting Components:

fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN


AIIas Number:

Cnmonnent Served: NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP 26N

Power Train: MA

wanufacturert BORG. MARNER Kodeit NX 0500-FM

Panel

EC~ Drawing: H/A Miring Drawing: N/A

Pnwer Source: N/A

Mal%down: F Relay Only: M

Comoonent I'ype:ISO Drawings:

HE ~

Detailed Location:

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HE-34-NE (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD MECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: N SAFETY

INJECTION PUMP RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BORG-WARNER, NX-0500-FW




3. The capacity of connections between the. anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to orgreater than the demand.

4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom,vertical tank.


N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

S S C

~co vinsSRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/1/93.

ANCHORAGE ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEERING JUDGMENT OF THE SRT.

6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety Injection Pump with 2 1/2" bolts. Could havescreened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed seperately on the SSEL.

Crane above in a parked and locked position.

Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment: Pictures

DC COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) ~


ID: 1-HE-34-NE (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD MECHANICALSEAL HEATEXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: N SAFETY

INJECTION Pt MP RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BORG-WARNER, NX-0500-FW

NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N

~~xc vnr ~vs~ iiu. viaATTACHMENT NO. 1


Un1t g Bldg.A. 5a4z h~ e~ ', 9„ Rn

Locat1onC

Installat1on dwg. / Rev.

Anchora e Arran ement, SketchEqu1pment No.

F46'v. J>I=4 45DksQl c

yj'4 Ooi~Yyp

Vlc o.O.

INDiAHA." llCHIGA"IPOY(ERCONSTRLICT!Oib CGLTROLLEO

EYORKING COPY

S~P g g tqap

Oo

I~l

FLo 'E4.'-0

~ T,

4 Gra q

' i

CLERK

k7

,:IDrawn by:Verified by:

Reviewed by:

Date: /8-/-Date: L-Z.- 'P <

Qual. /Cert. InspectorDate:

nstruct1on Anchor Rev1ew Engineer


Equipment No.:

Tightness Verified by:

Tightness established by "Snug Fit"Tightness veri'ed by: 'C.

goal./Cert. Inspector

onstruction ARE

Comments:

Equip ID: 1-TK-11 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21

Drawing No.: 1-5142

ction: RI

ys tern: BORON INJECTION

Equip Desc: BORON INJECTION TANK

Building: AUXILXARY Room: BORON INJECTION TANK ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:


Alias No: Power Train:

Comp Served: BORON INJECTION TANK

Mfr: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP.

Model: 900 GALS, O'I'.Elem. Drawing: 1-98282


Power Source: '1-AM-D-5A 1-AM-A-2A


Comp Type: TANKa

ISO Drawing:

Min/Opt: MIN

Location: XN THE MIDDLE OF ROOM, 15'W OF THE ROOM'S ENTiVQICEDOORWAY.

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev. 0)Description: BORON INJECTION TANK

Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORONINJECTION TANKRM, IN THEMIDDLEOF RM, 15'WOF THERM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS, 4'lBASIS: External analysis






N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

SMC

~CO ~~SSRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.

ADEQUACYOF ANCHORAGE AND TANKTO SUPPORT CONNECTION BASED ON JUDGMENT BY THE SRTAND COMPARISON TO THE BORIC ACID TANKEVALUATION.

Tank is 5'iameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/8" flange) 4'R" inheight..

Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/ two embedded 1 3/4" bolts with 2'-11" embedment

Weld of leg to tank about 14" in length and 1/4" thickness on each side of the wide flange and 10" at the top of thewide flange.

Adjacent Block wall reinforced with column supports and it is not an interaction concern.

The Seismic Evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) is seismically adequate. The Boron Injection Tank (1-TK-11) is much smaller but has about th. same support. Therefore, Tank 1-TK-11 is judged adequate.

DC COOK Unit 1




Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORONINJECTION TANKRM, IN THEMIDDLEOF RM, 15'WOF THERM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS. 4'lEvaluated by: Date:

- fs.


DC COOK Unit 1




Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORONINJECTION TANKRM, IN THEMIDDLEOF RM, 15'W OF THERM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS, 4'lELILlEH

BASE ANCHORAGE PEDESTAL SUPPORT COLUMN TO TANKCONNECTION

Coo

Component No. ~ TK. <laic Ql

Any payticulir area the Seismic Revue~ Teaa should pay extra attention to?Yes ~ No (If yea, check items that apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor Embedment <Anchor Edge DistanceAnchor CapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor CripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack


If there ts concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicableitem and explain.

l.2.3.4(,.

Hardvare Maintenance Type DiscrepancyDrawing Up&,te „Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Design Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:

Actions Taken:

Prepared By D444

L2 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHM.NT NO. 1

AQ'L ~~I'-0" ClBldg.

I - T>C. -IlEquipment

Un tI2- 3514.-17



BORON'MKCTIOM tAMI( t=.I GMLocation

O

NO. Ycxwk, Loc. =+i@~ +aK<IrPro~ Dwg. (0-33] "t-l7

E I"x I5"X l5"

W IO» 4.5

I ~1~'+ AMOSHQLY'5 PEPDRAINlklC) Q.357')-20

o

O.

6J

Qc

40Qg INOI.-'sic. r'.I.,r< ~ „".

SITE 0::SIGN COrWORKING CGc ~

JUL lg tSS5

LERK

Drawn by:Verified, by: ~

Qua . Cert. InspectorDate:

Reviewed by: = 4,Construct on

Date:c or Review Engineer


.2 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Un t AUX. (oQ'-0" EL.Bldg.

BQROQ M,K,CT'lQKL TAMK PQQMLocation



I-TK-)iEquxpment No.

)8

ELK.V. LKC. UHH

INOIANA MICKIGAN POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO

WORKING COPY

lUt. 1)1995

LERK~


Reviewed by:

Date:Date:

Construction AnDate:

or Review Engineer

Qua . Cert. Xnspector3


~ ~ ~ 4 4 vo 4 ~ gag t/i y)

ATTACHMENT No.

quipment No, I- Vl(-iL ~ No i ~pe. c i-.Yaw< ~g No.:Anchor type: >~+ ~"P~ ~ I~~ Dia: I ++ Dwg No.:Tightnass cata isnas hy: FJ "snug Fit" 0 Torque

g Torque Wrench No.: hlh Cal. Due Date:

+Q- Tightness verified'? 0 Yes 0 No Date:

ons ruc ronq Equipment base flexible7 D Yes I No ' <">l Date:

ons ruc xo ARE

/o Pj ~J I ~

)Q %~7+

Bolt ID'/tie" A '13K A

COIIIments I

Anchorlen h

s //' w'//'j1eb' v 4

Z'-II" @ 0 ~ '-I I

" ~ g 2'-IFE.CE~ RGCLGSE.OProtruding p~~T~o

< ~/ ., ~a galen th

P.ECESXQ <ITT I HICK Ill4 p/+» )/In ~ > + @

Ih I ICD

Embedment~v

2-6'/s" 2'-5'e

Boltri Z."~<~" 2 '~o" 6 '4" 2'/e" E>4"V<t." GPGUY

condition'""'te CO~Cea iS CeC~ IL BELD-LCa

PER CPAV{LLLCs

Edge 4/A N/A M /'A IM/4, 4/A 4/0, hL/0, g/A &z)g<distance TIS IQ Q.m

Anchors acinAnchor

an larit

6'/z" 8'/z" 8" B " 8" 5" 8"Atu QIOR

4/4 4/A kVA UJA kl /A IJ/A U/4 4/A &Hi u~TW (N >/S ' I+" ~/~- our mi~~a-.

Thread " ~ecE~ t-I< RE~a RccEss 0 i4 P,G Ess DK. H ICengagement

Comments, + UA'TA, 'QoT QwtlkiEQ DUE 'To 7 AYLQM.INA

UUOKTALNA LIE TCi T P,

Verified by-gua ,//Cert inspector

Ravieved by:Construct on ARE

INDIANALIIGHT'..:SITE OESIGN CONTRC~ 0

WORKING COPY

Date: -> 3

Pago 2 of 3Revision 1

LERK 9 '~ I

S '8 'A DEPAR'FMENTCONTROLLED DOCUMENTCOPY NO. 'P -l

2 SHP 5050 NDE.008ATTACP2KNT NO. 1

ULTRASONiC TEST REPORT

C

A'/Tg

gy

REQUEST NO. JA

IDENTIFICATION

Unit + eComponent: - 7 f -//Item n/ A/'/--Naterial ~/

Other C)

TECHNI UE-'tl

Test Unit/ S/NL(.i -'/'S

Freq./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

Cz c "RQS

TEST DATA RENARKS

A /T c'L C

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:"


LEVEL~ DATE: 3 23 ~13

LEVEL:~ DATE: Y ZS


Equip ID: 1-TK-37 Train: 12 Equip Class:21

Drawing No.: 1-S13SA

ction: CCW~

~

System: CCW

Equip Desc: COMPONENT COOIING WATER SURGE TANKggc

Building: AUXILIARY Room:~ HALLWAY$ 5o

Elev: %69- Sort: S, Notes:



Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: CONDENSATE COOLING TANK

MFR: SPEAR AND WOOD

Y"Gel: 10000GAL, 2' x 12'

'lem. Drawing: N/A

Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source: N/A


Comp Type: TANK (COMMON DIVIDED BY BAFFLE}

Iso Drawing:

Location:

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-TK-37 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SPEAR AND WOOD, 10000GAL, 2' x 12'






5. A ring- pe foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

SRT: Gary Thomas and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.

Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height. Skirt is 4'4" high from the top of the pad to skirt connection totank. Skirt has 1/2" thickness. There are 8 bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" highx 4" length x 2" width.

Bolts supported from 3" x 3" x 1/2" angle.

Crane above tank has been evaluated by AEPSC for seismic loads.

The results gave a safety factor of 1.06 for the anchor bolts using the GIP penalty for J-bolt embedment.

A hand calculation that included in the package was performed for the bolt stresses.

Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: External Anchorage Analysis for 1-rK-37

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet2of5

ID: 1-TK-37 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SPEAR AND WOOD, 10000GAL, 2' x 12'

BOLT TO TANKDETAIL

CUENT <<Iota S'+t-I "" attar ~ or~

Stevenson and Assodates

8 A Structural Meelto atcolCoo<atria<5 Eat<to«a<toy Fr<ra

D5

~ ~

5P fA

~ ~

6Cl

»

th

~ .\

<It» tu l.'.

-<o» ( «o

45 i

~ 'I

'L~ I

I, A,S»hf

tht I

hr

h»ft

gl Pg ti

<; » I '«rtrl tth.

I~ I

I (~f ~ ~

«'l'

\I ~ I

*

I»5 p. «,

I ~ '<

~ „.,~ .If

yh(l

~5

\ ~

of

(tl '551<»»

~ r

» Cf Pl»h I ftjj

II«L

pt 'p tr

5

» I

tt ''I11 lh l O

.Il

trrlh

I

u (

5

»rl»g

r ~ ttro

~ t

55>'5 t,:.It}

I~

CIJENT 4(S Sl. 8 "" L I ., '7 M stru. ~ I

SUBJECT ~ ~s'1 P w w Cg«I Ccs ~.~ uI <, I(J>1.c 7E

A Ic- [ « ~g ~ 5 7

Stevenson and AssodatesAS(ruccurc!.MccIsr aces l

Coarul((s(r Ea(r(act((ay E(rsi

is»I 4.," . ~,

gc '?N.

4 E~E. I«II)I IEII,(

u ~ 1' ilr 7 r(c

'I„~ ~

8'ci

1 *

5 ~ 11.'cc

„~II

'I ~ 4

r?

~ » 1~

h.

Il .CI VI Qlr ~

1 I41\5,

* 4 ~4

)i% tl7 (l»P

re» ~ t (1; I.Ilrr, '114 "C

?u

qg.c i r PL ?cl

»»

I» cl

'4'i. ''7(

~ C

7( '5„

. Itrr

~ I

~C E

~ '

~ lC'I

cgt

114 QI

CI

fine

»4 1

~

l,''FV

I\ ~

~ir

p7

~ t I

rli

~roc 2?P

O'«'»I'

rI

-,c; r(lr»;~

irc»I x

5

7

4 44

kt'''I

lr»E

1 I»7

S"Cj 4'PW

I'ic~ CI

C("'"' I t«lv, «(7s,c ~

'r«r,. Ttt(I

I 5»r

:Lt ~I".1 ()r

E~ 4

r'

4

CuEHT Y) 9 ~' " SHEET OF

g@~ C ~~~ F ~~ a V ~ c.ter„- 4-IJt r.Z»

7 ht tc, ( h'rSteve@son and Assodatcs

0 *Stractara)-Mac)raalcalCoarldttay Ka2ltaccrlatr Ftral

44

(2

2 7.

'24"4'fcr.gf

,44rr ~

44144

2

IFJt ll ~ I

r-'29'vYt ~

".4.' 'r Jtt

'24" V

i g 2 'tFI't 4)

'II~ \

Fr

YYt

g 'I

~ '

~

' 1' . ~ > ''r.Vrx 2FI' - 41. 241

~4

h ~

41 ~

Pl2

~ 44,

'YrY

I;"2 ~Ih

222~

' '1

fIrl\IF

) 4Y.C 44

Y'4

22Y2", I.f ~ .g;\s Yl

*)f.

h'F.y I



Unxt "

/2-3 Z7Bldg.

Y(-Location



'w MG ORNA

INDIANACONST RU

w

a 3 ~992

MICHIGAN POWER

TION CONTROLLEO

RKIHG COPY

« ~L 4''-o

Drawn by.Verified by

Date:Date:

Reviewed by:Q al./Cert. Inspector

Date: Snstructzon Anchor Review Engineer


**12 CHP 5021 CCD O19ATTACHMENT NO. 1

ANCHOR INSPECT10N DATA SHEET

Unxt g

Q-3Bldg. Locate.on


Anchora e Arran ement SketchEcpxzpment No.

INDIANAMICHIGAN POWER

CONSTRUCTION CONTROLLEDWORKING COPY

AUG 1 > 1992

CLERK .> +~~

8/y

.:c "aq'.e


Reviewed by:QG ./Cert.

nstructxon

Date:

Date:Inspector

P

Date:Anchor Review Engineer

-I- l



r


Unxt g Bldg. Location

Installatz.on dwg. / Rev.


1- -3

(gp($ +4 <4(QH>GAB POWERQON$ TQQCv n~ GONTSOLLEO

wOR ~. 'Ci CC('Y

azw

p~l ~b c<~ (omnlsonS Votv SrC r~a~ +i~>

Leo +

H» +

Fl 6

oP)s

4r 3+c//< Ãs B% 3'ls


Reviewed by:

Date:

Date:Q l./Cert. Inspector

Date:onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer


l s

fi ~

~ ~

I ~ ~

,;~/~ N

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

s ~

~W~sRM~RHR%a ~ ~ aMMIIIIIIIII585mmlmmmRSIIIRIMIIIII

RSIIISIIIRSRRIIII55. Iles% .. l%I%

IIIIIISIIIHIIa

Rse&R4%Ã%RM~RJ%8%5%MWWMWMW&I

~ La Sl ~ ~i

~~K9MEX >

LL ~ L ~ (

~~asia~ ~

~ I ~

~ ~ ~

~~ ~ i f ~

~ ~

Equipment No.: I .! -

~'ightnessestablished by "Snug Fit"Tightness veri fied by:

Qual. /Cert. Xnspector

Comments:

Equip XD: 12-TK-47-AB Train: 1 Equip Clays,:21

wing No.: 2-5151C

tion: EMERG DIESEL

System: DIESEL FUEL OXL

Equip Desc: AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK (BURIED IN THEYARD)

Building: GROUNDS Room: INNER PLANT GROUNDS




Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status:.NUCLEAR SR


Comp Served: AB FUEL OXL STORAGE TANK

MFR:

60,000 GALS (12'IA X 72'ONG)'Panel:

Elem'. Drawing: NgA

Hiring Drawing: N/A

Min/Opt: MIN

Power Source: N/A


Comp Type: TANK (COMMON FOR UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2)240 HRS FULL LOAD.

Xso Drawing: 7

Location: BEXNG REPLACED UNDER RFC 12-4113,, CI NOT APPROVED AS OF9-15-92.

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 12-TK47-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANKBuilding: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT

GROUNDS UNIT0 2 BURIEDSOUTH OF TURBINE BUILDING

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 12'IAX 69'-10"LONG, 60000 GALS



-2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than thedemand.


4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom,vertical tank..


N/A

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

mQKS

SRT: George G. Thomas (SBA) and Tom Huang (AEP)'C

Underground tank. SRT evaiuated this tank based on the ave~~able documentation in the equipment package.

A tank calculation was performed (included in the tank package) based on the reference drawings The tank wasmodeled as a beam on elastic foundation. The overall tank stresses were very low (on the order of 3.6 ksi).

Evaluated by:

~gi-) Date:

il /Z ~low"

Attachment: EVALUATIONOF STRESSES IN THE TANK

CUENT

g - a4CttO5~

Stcvcnson and Assodatcs

EIAStructural Maclen aleut

Conautttatr Kntrtncartng Ftrra > cn tn-

OSC

CLlEHT

SUMECT

Stevenson and Associates

ElA scuctvcal Mechanical

coasulctsy Elplaoocno f4'

CUENT

Stcvcnson and Associates

k A Stsucturel-M eAe nleslCoaoultlaa Koalnooriay Fina . C. ~ Ca~ 4

CUENT


R A StnsctvcehMocha alcalCoaaoltlay Eagtoeeaay Fina De +e C-WO W

CUENT


h st(udvrasMecha aleafCoawltlay Knylnoodng fire

g CUENT


Il A Structursl-Mschs nicslConsulting Engtn«ring Sirrn

z08Pu

5 ~ 4, No~ o

—1 '3 lOc 3%

c

4CUENT

Stevenson end Assodatcs

l5 A Srrucrural.McchaalcalCaarulung Kaalaccriny flrra Pr Cr 8 WOCr

CUENT


II h StructurohM echo uk olCuaoulttau Kactaoortatr fto ra

I 2.

S (

CUENT


8 A SICIICIVC1I.MWL4OIC4ICoaoul5sy Kaylneorlng Feaa D.

a ggg

CUENT

SVMEGT

Stcvcnson and hssodatcs

8 ASvuctural.MechanicalCoaaultiog K~laoeclny Eitoa

Y-t

A.

Equip ID: 2-HE-11 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21

Drawing No.: 2-5129A 2-5135~

~

~ction: RI

System: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER INZ/LEAKOFF

Equip Desc: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEATEXCHANGER

Building: AUXILIARY Room: SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP

Mfr: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO.

Blem. Drawing: N/A

Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source:

Walkdown: F Relay Bval : N

Min/Opt: MIN

Comp Type: HEAT EXCHANGER

ISO Drawing: 2-CS-91 2-CS-100

Location: IN WEST AREA OF ROOM

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 2-HE-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SEAL WTR HEAT

XCHGR RM - IN WEST AREA OFROOM

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRIALMANUFACTURINGCO.







N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

S U

~CVIF~S

SRT: Gary Thomas and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.

Vertical Heat Exchanger on a Gusseted steel pedestal. Each Pedestal is anchored to the floor with 8- 3/4" J-Boltsembedded 20" into floor.

Exchanger is 16" in diameter and 14'n height.

Exchanger is bolted to the steel pedestal with,2 1" diameter steel bolts on 6" centers in weak direction and 2'-8" instrong direction. This connection is more limiting than the anchorage to the floor.

Attached calculation was to judge adequacy of these for bolts.

The exchanger has a frequency of 10.6 Hz and the bolts had a safety factor in tension of 3.54.

Evaluated by: Date:

IC) /4

~g~ CZ

Attachment: Picturesttachment: Verification of Bolt Connection

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 2-HE-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SEAL WTR HEAT

XCHGR RM - IN WEST AREA OFROOM

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRIALMANUFACTURINGCO.

ECUlKR

SUPPORT PEDESTAL TOP OF THE EXCHANGER

CUENT

SUBJECT

t'()Ne.Q CaO<~


S ASllvclvlal-MCCIIIalcolCoalvlgag Saglaotllag Fitch

Ahchol' ~ Acca oaohC Slcatch

2-HHIIoalcro Vatlaco tacofaSllC DYSICN CDNYIDSIIO

clalclha cotY

Sfp lS 1SSS

I~ I(

I ~

h'YI'nt>

NYCTlS fC(WF)

~,Clyl

, ~')

eIC.S ~

qvr)"..'LEV

l K(o C)SST

~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r er'

~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ h ' ~ ~

rt'acatl4c

". )pP

;I@aha'

li cac

~ \hr 5't,o IODIINC IVQOCAN YOOC~ cl 5 Dcslca cahl caslto

voc claa can

SSP lS lSSS

SIC

IYCSO IAIL~FA) AD

CIYcltaJ

IICCDI13(YYY )

«CIO II3(rlrg.-,'t

IYCSO'Wt(tel Y3)

~ ICSDWIlg

~ I~ '

I. "~

T eotTtrit)

tr(»

3ECY.'t\3 ccc(cccl c-c N occuv)

r~

C

A Bl I 'oh0 0p 0

0 0c e

o. ~

0 0II IC

0 0F >3 e(FID)

0 0IC

0 0C I\

L

C,caclr

~E

sell:'rc I

0 0T.

rL ~

,Ql01hhc I cocah cocca«lc Dlgas cac IDLsco

aacclha catt

SfP'S SSSS

acscT

r0 ~aa Iaa

S.

g.)i

~ r

g+Ps

Yah CI'I

c I,

tC

'Ã)' ~

'S

C

CUEHF

QJBJECT

Stevenson and Assodatcs

8 A Structural-MectfaalcalCoaru! o oft Eatftocurtafr Fifa<

P P.

~ i'I, h ,f ~

P.'

~cK

«<<I

j.fipv»<YA ~iverfl"gv vruhu '. 'P<% .fc\u <K

h.. 'g"I

~ )

I t» f«~lg 'tfr lg«»u'P vh tlap

P..

~, '«

rr'pi

t,'hr >

f. ~ I ~

p

pfr

»~

» I

~ «

~ u / Pf»

P

h

P..

htrfu P

~h«

IP

gh'

I

l'I

r<

up

I'P H

f '«

'

~ru ~

I

~ I

qtr ~ »Irph

r'tfu Ip.

hFrutarp

toKj .ifu* ~

h

CUENT JOB No.

SUBJECT ~@AweEW

Stevenson and Assoctntes

IR.ASt( ucfuf al.Macha afccl

CuafulffaffRaffface(Lay Sic(a

4~

1 ~

+1

~ I

Jul gl»

~'gIu4

«P

Irp ( ~

/««

«ls 1,14 'la»n. ~

\'..IP 'f

»J

Sir! I

'I .4

.'"4,')!e/Off P CP

'"'5 III,I(lr«"«»l

«'+rrf„»VtfPP

PrirI~ 1

~ I ru

I'« "f~ 'I

~pI'-

l -'5 4

crap l»Q,:If

(~"r, ~ 44

I(l«»I'l('

lI ~

uf'I

14.C'«PPP

~ 1,1P

~ «1«

''1 1(Q/

'1 »t

%14 r IIIu

~rpl

rpI

0(fg ff

CUENT JOB No. ~ 'HEET OF


5 AStructural.l4ucha attutCoaruttiag Kagtauurtag Firar

L.

~ r~ r,

Coo

Componone yo, 2 Class l

Any paxpicular area the Seismic Review Teaa should pay extra attention totYes < No (Xf yea, check items that apply.)

Anchor TypoAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor Embodmont<Anchor Edge DistanceAnchor CapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor CripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack

~qs ~ ~~T

gjO I/ E; Q Pl I IJ (. ) <Al(= (gE'L

Other'a (describe bri.oily)

TE there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, cir'clo the applicableitem and explain.

1.2.3.

Hardware Maintenance Type Discrepancyl'raving Upd?te Typo DiscrepancySigni|.'icant Operability/Design Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:

Actions Taken:

Prepared By

**12 CHP 5021.CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEESBfn DATER I+&ATAX . M @Oq -01'AC,HAhl4BR g.oug

Bldg. Location



2..~-I tEctuzpment No.

2-HG "I I

INDIANA I IICMIGAN POWCRSITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO

WORKING COPY

SEP t)1995

g(

~ I

|<YPg

~i1 R(7<~)

I/Z,R.(~p) ~Ag

~b<~ 0 \

~ h~

<~b

PLED. gK.G C A&T

Date:

Date:

Drawn by:

Date:Engineer

.Verified by:~ ual./Cer . Inspector

Reviewed by: TConstrue won An hor Review



ANCHOR INSPECT ON DATA SH E

Unxtl2- 3z



(>yp) IVB &(T9P)

I

,'A 0 0P

0 0I

~4

I

0 0

0 0>/g Z(~p)

0 08

C AFOOTPee .

0 0

I-O'RP

I IOIAPIA iVICHIGAN POPOVER

SITE OESIGN CONTROlLEDYPORKIHG COPY

SEP t~1995

.LFRKT

Drawn by: Date:Verified by: Date:

al. Cert. XnspectorReviewed by: Date:

Construction Anch r Review Engineer


*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

CHOR INSPECTION DAT S

A"SX ~ gPa'-O" S~ %PITCH &BR'TBXCHfHIGBR. RooH

Unitl 2- 525s

Bldg.



H~ -1(Equipment No.

Location

INDIANAI.IICHIGAN PO'ilE'RSITE DLSIGN COMTROLLiD

WORKING COPY

SF.P 13 ISSUE

LERK

W~Hb('TYPE) 3/( y

WMAj ~/II(~P'L) /Ig

HMH$~P2.) ~I(

w~ wB

wm wl

.bi,'ob'4'ga

J BoiT(~P)

e'$~ ~

5CCT, Z -8 (scca c;c ~«~+~~)

Drawn by: Date: ~ 1

Verified by:~ ~

ual Cert. InspectorReviewed by: T

Construe won chor Review

Date:

Date:Engineer

-F-F


ATTACHMENT NO ~ 1

ANC OR SP

EquipmentNo.-'mbeddedSteel Dwg. No.:

YSICA CHARA IS C

Dwg No.:

Weld IDT e

SizeLen thCracks

2I/Yes Yes Yes Yes s

'/ ~II I >/II 3li t

l II/ %4" <4'8I/Yes

oYesNo

YesNo

Weld e Codes


Lack of ~ePenetrationes Yes es QeQs Yes

No NoYesNo

Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes'es YesNo

YesNo

INDIANAMICHIGAN POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

SEP tg t995

LERK

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5-Noons ruc z n e

Date:

Reviewed'y:

Verified by:ons ruc won c or evzev ngxneerV

a .. e . npsec or

Date: t l2 3

Date:

Page 3 of 3Revision

*~12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Equipment No.:Anchor type: GODET

Tightness established by: 0Torque Wrench No.:Tightness verified? 0 Yes

Equipment base flexible? 0

Dia:"Snug Fit"

Dwg No.: l2-32pwg No ~: I 2 - '32 8$

0 TorqueCal. Due Date:

No Date: 1ons c 10Yes C(No ~. Date: 0 1-13

ons uc 1 n ARE

C C

Bolt IDGaps

Anchorlen th

A 5 C O e. F cl aeT I/S~"em Yg>'STc $$ $Hpv gpss

\ It I " 'I V< ii i il c « I II2.- 0 2,- 0 Z-o 2.- o 2- o g-0 2o

0

2-0

Comments

f~ IYI QCfCjI 2.-3vlgG

Protruding p I5/l~ g" p'I ~ '>/~ ~"/g Z~Jy

edment )I )I//)~i iI qu 1< qu lI-1" li q'i~I 1 qy8 ) q


Edgedistance

g ( 2. /IX P I 2." > I W ) I> W t 2. 0 I 2. 7i2-

Anchors acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

@II @tl @'II @II ( 4 u

~4 Oo i~o 00 g0 OO O4 ()

0

oy 0 y ng oK. ot. ck ok o((

Comments:

Verified by:r9 a ., ert. Inspector

Revieved by:Construct on ARE SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WOIIKING COPY

SEP l~ 1995

LEIIK

Date:

Date:

ago2of 3ovision -3

~ I e

~ ~ k

~ ~ '

~ ~

~ ~ e

~ ~ e

~ ~ I- ~ ~ 4' ~ / I

e 14elec

~ ~ II I - d e

W '

.R Lk

ommmmiimmmi.

- IIIIIIIIHImmmIIRlmmmmRRIIIRI mm58~ ~ ~ o p o

~ - = ISRIIRHIIIIIIR5lRRREMIIMMIT&

~ i g $ J I' ]'0 ) J WW%%

~ .

0

S 8 A DEPARTMENTCONTROLLEO DOCUMENTCOPY NO.



JOB ORDER NO.: CQ 4, REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO. M A,

IDENTIFICATION

Unit 'l ~CDComponent 2 — - l l

ItemMaterial + SOther

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/Frey./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No. C <

TEST DATA REMARKS

PERFORMED BY:

REUIEWED BY:


LEVEL: M~ DATE: / 5Page 1 of 1Revision 0

Emlip ID: 2-HE-38E Train: 2 Equip Class:21J

wing No.: 2-5135A

ction: CCW

System: MISCELLANEOUS SEALING AND COOLXNG

Equip Ddsc: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER

Building: AUXILIARY Room: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP ROOM


Normal State: Desired State:


Req'd Support Comp:


Power Req'd: N

Min/Opt: MIN


Comp Served: EAST CENTRXFUGAL CHARGING PUMP

MFR: AMERXCAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES (BASCO)

M

Pa lElem. Drawing: N/A

Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source: N/A


Comp Type: HE

Iso Drawing: 2-CCÃ-515, 2-CCW-508

Location: XN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OFEAST CENTRXFUGAL CHARGING PUMP g2-PP-50E

DC COOK Unit 2SCREENING EVALUAPION WORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-HE-38E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers

Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: E CENTRIFUGALCHARG PMP ROOM -'IN THENORTHEAST PART OF THEROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OFEAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGINGPUMP ¹2-PP-50E

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MIDLAND-ROSS/ROSS-OPERATING VALVECO.


Description: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER






N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

C Y D


ANCHORAGE TO PUMP ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEERING JUDGMENT OF THE SRT

Small exchanger 1'W" long and 5" in diameter bolted to 2 1'ong channel columns that are welded to the skid ofthe East Centrifugal Charging Pump. Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however theexchanger was listed seperately on the SSEL.

Crane above in a parked and locked position.

Evaluated by: Date:


DG COOK Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)

GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet2of2

ID: 2-HE-38E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: E CENTRIFUGAL

CHARG PMP ROOM - IN THENORTHEAST PART OF THEROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OFEAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGINGPUMP ¹2-PP-50E

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MIDLAND-ROSS/ROSS-OPERATING VALVECO.

EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50ELUBE OIL COOLER

**12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Un1tNA




hu -&. gz'-o'ldg. Location

'2-H-E-5 6Ecgxzpment No.

INDIANA MICHIGAN PPW'FgSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

AUG 25 t985

LEgK T'(eek>~

O'- III"

~~~ 7O QCIC E,

g,g<, wssT

Date:6 a-pa

Drawn by-Verified by:

goal.] ert. InspectorReviewed by: Dt:

Constructxon nchor Review Engineer



Unct g

MhInstallation dwg. / Rev.


ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET~gT c.CHTRi~h~ C.~)gg~X-BL 5'5 t-0 Puca A.o~e

Bldg. Locationa-~-BEE

Equipment No.

INOIAtEA PiCHIGAW "OWERSITE OESICh CON~RGu.EO

AORKltIQ COPT

AUG 25 1885

I.ERi< 7

y+'~ PPI T, CJ~~~qq~si~ e u) ~T~P)

~l

I

ookiQt ORTH

Drawn by-Verified by'-

~/~la,~D tDate:

ual./Cert. InspectorReviewed by: T Date:

Construct@on An hor Review Engineer


Equip ID: 2-QT-134-CD Train: 2 Equip Class:21

D awing No.: 2-5151D

tion: EDG

System: DIESEL JACKET WATER

Equip Desc: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER(TANK)

Building: AUXILIARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM

Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: B



Req'd Support Comp: 2-ABD-C-1D

Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN


Comp Served: CD AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER

MFR: INDEECO

75KW HEATER

Panel: 2-DGCD



Power Source: 2-ABD-C-1D


Comp Type: TANK

Iso Drawing:

Location: IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CDEMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP g2-QT-130-CD2,



ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL

GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP82-QT-130-CD2,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER






5. A ring- pe foundation is not used to support a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

DE

SRT: W. Djordjevic and TR Satyan Sharma. 10/6/93.

REF: 1. Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics DataSheet, Certified 8/31/93.2. Dwg 0 12-3468-13.3. Worthington Corp. Dwg. SK7938, 8-23-74

Anchorage: 2-QT-134-CD is the J.W. Heater, separately mounted by three1/2" coupling configuration of rod andPhillips Redhead wedge type anchors. Tightness was verified by torque, 6/28/93.

For anchorage evaluation, see External ANCHOR analysis, File: 2QT134CD.ANC. Weight of fullwater tank isestimated as 550 Ib (assumed with 12.75" OD, .375" Wall thickness, flat.375" thick end plates, 64" height, and4.18 cu. ft volume ofwater). Considered as a cantilever with distributed load, the fundamental frequency isestimated to be 82.5 Hz. Actual response is governed by fixityof the base; anchorage system consists of three5/16" x 2" x 6.25" plates welded to the bottom of the tank at 120 degree intervals. Considering the base flexibilityand configuration, the frequency was estimated to be 8.96 Hz. as indicated on the attached calculation. TheANCHOR analysis intlicates a factor of safety of 3.74, however, the capacity of the anchorage is controlled by thebase plates with a factor of safety of 1.84 as shown in the attached calculation.

DC Cook Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS}

GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2114I92Status: YesSheet 2 of 14


GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP42-QT-130-CD2,


Evaluated by: Date'.

/ L/i3 ~/~g

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: Anchor Plate Seismic Capacity Evaluation for 2-QT-l34-CD

DC Cook Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS'j


ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUX!LIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL

GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2,


2-QT-134-CD

CUFNT

SUBJECT

Stovenson and Assodatcs

8 A S!rucru ral.Mocha a!colCoaoulaa4 KOO!aoorlaO Flrra

tttch

»I~

II

cA

~ gcggg~ E//z$guG- 8g+s~t,+~447rdP'p4/g, 0~~/GALS. (7-". zw.l~S)

IOO 'P~p//8 &gdVf8&.ChF gh'E-

.~CU~ge~ ~Eg ti/VSr d~Q-//di~ gg 444'/0 ~igh~ APOXg'rdn44 Q FC707 5

'?h"4'.e i'~Sfl

I.'r)I

i 8I

$0'

5

zo'', III~ ~

~ ~

~ I

O ~ .

iI» ICg+

rt )%hi

kj.

It'!ho'r

I

* I ~

h

roll 04f8 Igd 095

t.tt

).AMERlCANELECTRiC POWER

.,'@RVICE CORPORATiON

)gf'APPtHOVEO (N GENERAL"8-~IOVEDEXCEPT AS NOTED

'U:.NOT APPROVED

0:~ MFEREN E ONLY

DzR!.I l5 Zrv/.

/j

I ~

or»or Ioor

IOIICuott Iorouorltc

OOI C

.p4

c. ubr

I IIIIO ' c ~ ' 'LI ' I ' ' ~ L t.tent L 4 Ii':. ''~":5'l'Li

Y'),, I

~ I

CUEN~ P

Stevenson and Assochtes

8 ASttuctu tat.McchaatcalCoatutttay Eaglacortay Fttta

z

t ~

4',r.)}

c

%)

~~ ~ ul I

,1

%St . ~

~ i

ag

~i/pcs

c

rt

ft u Mc

CUENT

R~ IZI qs.8


5 A Sciacra ral44>eba alaalCaaralaay Karrlaeerlarr furr

1'1~r

~ h

LA ~

'I'v»r»4+

~»I I

LhUIC

~'IAh

~ I ~

A

LV

AIIl

Al

.LC

hl

1VC

h. ~

gQ re<A g~'(

if'J 5~> li~~;

S»1 ~

ra

av ~ b

ALII U ~ IP

I~

, rv

~ 1I

r»»'.IVIS

~ QI

h »Il

iri A IL,ag

~ I

ol I~ Lr

lh

I Lhr .'I'Ij $>

»C'I (

'IVI

I a.l ~'"iv4

'C S

11>I:m al >.

i ~ » I .I).hI ~ A' Il'

~ I A I

'

CUENT

SVBJECT

SHEET OF


A SvvctuwhMeehs nleelCoaeu!tlag Kagiaoeriaq face

\2/0 9s

CLiFNT


8 A Strttctttral Meeit4444ealCOatultttty sag(4444tlttti fltat

4+0'-

~P

4 ~ 4, 4~

'S

at"I

* .g! tQ;,<JS * SS4 i

+~I

4 StS p

~ S

rs p4

44



ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers

Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSLGEN RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2,

Floor El.: 587.00Building: AUXILIARY


Description: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)

K Ij:tbaualx'esponseSpectrum: User

Frequency: User - 8.96Percent Damping: User - 0.0G



Angle (N-S Direction makes with the XAxis): 0.00Combination Criteria: SRSS

~Wightumber of Weights: 1

No Weight1 550.00 6.875 0.000 32.000


XmasNumber of External Moments: 0

gggygiJPp~hacharNumber of Anchor types: 1


InterShearInter Saf

No Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact1/2 Phillips Wedge (N) 2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00

Qmmta'ltimateStress: 3500.00 psi..

eduction Factor: 0.8 .


GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/ti4/92Status: YesSheet 10 of 14


GEI'I RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-CD2,


Kaid'llowable Stress: 30600 psi.

Rzfvm'umberof Surfaces: 1

Surface Orientation

No

DirectionComp

Nx0.000

DirectionComp

0.000

DirectionComp

Nz1.000



Anchor Bolts .

Concrete Linen: ~mmConcrete Points .

Vleld Lines:


GIP Rev 2, Corrected,2/14/92'tatus:

YesSheet 11 of 14

ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL

GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CO EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP¹2-QT-130-C02,


Qmmdnhrzhar.Number ofAnchors: 3

NoAnch

Id Coord0.000

14.06314.063

Coord0.000

-8.1198.119

ZCoord

0.0000.0000.000

SurfId



Start Start End End End Sf LineNo X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coo rd Id Width

-1.00011.43811.438

0.000-3.5723.572

0.0000.0000.000

6.25014.56314.563

0.000-8.9858.985

, 0.000 1

0.000 1

0.000 1

2.0002.0002.000


EcldJ.bm '

of elements per line: 4Number of Weld Lines: 0

Reduction Factor input for Anchor ¹ 1

Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: ( 2.13 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance- Edge 1: 5.00in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% BoltsEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes

mbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes

OC Cook Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)






Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: ( 2.13 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% BoltsEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


Adequately Installed: YesEmbedment Length: (2.13 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% BoltsEssential Relays in Cabinet: NoAdequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: YesEmbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes


AncNo Id

1 1

2 1

3 1

PaIVVali

2003.752380.002003.752380.002003.752380.00

PallrlVallr RT RN

1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.M1.00 1.001.00 1.00

RL RG RS1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.M1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

RE RF Rc RR1.00 0.88 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.M 0.88 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.88 1.M 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

RP RB RM1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.M 1.M 1.001.00 1.00 1.00

N/A = Not ApplicablePall = Allowable Pull without Reduced InspectionVali = Allowable Shear without Reduced InspectionPallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced InspectionVailr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection


RT

RL

= Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage= Reduction Factor for Installation Adequa= Reduction Factor for Embedment

DC Cook Unit2,~'CREENINGEVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. G) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL

GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEASTPART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEETNORTH OF CD EMERGENCYDIESEL JACKET WATER PLIMP¹2-QT-130-CD2,


RGRS

RFRCRRRPRB

= Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors= Reduction Factor for Spacing= Reduction Factor for Edge Distance= Reduction Factor foi Concrete Strength= Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks= Reduction Factor for Essential Relays= Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action= Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path= Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads


Type of Analysis: RegularSpectral Accelerations (G's)

No N-S E-W Vertical Safety Factor

10

121314

1617181920

222324

0.380-0.380-0.3800.3800.380

-0.3800.380

-0.3800.152

-0.1520.152

-0.152-0.1520.1520.152

-0.1520.152

-0.1520.152

-0.152-0.1520.1520.152

-0.152

0.152-0.1520.152

-0.152-0.1520.1520.152

-0.1520.380

-0.380-0.3800.3800.380

-0.3800.380

-0.3800.152

-0.1520.152

-0.1520.152

-0.152-0.1520.152

0.092-0.0920.092

-0.0920.092

-0.092-0.0920.0920.092

-0.0920.092

-0.0920.092

-0.092-0.0920.0920.230

-0.230-0.2300.2300.230

-0.2300.230

-0.230

4.2044.7044.5144.6124.2044.7044.6124.5145.6983.0395.6983.8593.7406.0646.0643.7408.2577.950

15.0066.8306.830

15.0068.2577.950



ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Meat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK)Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL





Coo

ComponenC Po. '2" KT ) ~4'laia

Any payticu1.ar area the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attention totYes V No (If yea, check itima that apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor Embedmen

'nchorEdge DistanceAnchor GapAnchor Thread Engagements~Anchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack&

khumrJsa

eA-

Others (describe bri.eely)

IE there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle th» applicablei.tom and explain.

1.2.3.

Hardvc,re Maintenance Type DiscrepancyDrawing Update Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Design Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition: a)c,(,~ <)~ P vV(c.8-o K

b> p, >F. +g0+R j~) g->$ 4

Actions Taken:

prepared By T. Dat. 0 » /~

'.2 CHP 5021 ~ CCD.019~TTACEQKNT NO. 1

TWQUn

(Z-34K- l3Znsta at on dwg. / Rev.


~P,qHEA,gg F OR'f)OQ OFROC'OOM.Sa7-0" L

Bldg- Locat on2,-GT-isa- CD

Equipment No.

IIZ'a l30LT VllTH QVERSlZEDWASHY.R 4 NUT )hl >s"38(CK, K, NG'9 54QTTEQ HQLE,

L'-0'ia"

MO WAG%.R

+A QA


WORKING COPY

AUG 51 1S95

LERK ~ ~

Drawn by: Date: c

Date: - 0

Date:or Review Engineer

Verified by:Qu ./Cert. Xnspector

Reviewed by:Construe on


~ ~

s ~ ~

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ II

~ ~ ~ I

~ I~

'

~ 4 ~w~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

i I ~

r~ ~ II

4~ ~ ~

e 'L ~ + ~ i ~ ~ 'l~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ -. Ci ~ I

l-s. L ~

o li)

I

I~ ~ ~ II

r ~

II

I~ 0

RHMeWsaMMMWWHHHL%%%EE.SL~LE55- ewmaaara858QERLl LEWlRISR%i EL

.- l%RiR~HRLWLLMWWWWW~W&mmRIHRHLIL5%l%SRHRRli%&WWWWK%RRiRgRkigi%~~~~~~

~ S ~

~ g'

I ~ ~

IE

> ~ l ~,

~ '~ '

5 <".~ A DEPT.Ri('v'.'='',".CONTROLLED DOCUMENTCOPY NO.

'2 SHP 5050 mE 008ATTACPNENT NO. 3


JOB ORDER NO.: /A Q ~)IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponent

Material V~Other 5- .

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/N y'S -'l~ CA.c'. -'sFreq. /DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

TEST DATA REMARKS

~ wl+%CC'.CS«LcC+

PERFORMED BX:

REVIEWED BY:


LEVEL:~ DATE:

LEVEL~- DATE.


Equip XD: 2-TK-76N Train: 2 Equip Class:21

P~awing No.: 2-5149

~

~

~

~ ~

ction: HVAC

System: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDXTXONING CHILL WATER

Equip Desc: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHXLL WATEREXPANSION TANK

Building: AUXILIARY Room: CONTROL ROOM AXR CONDITIONER ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MXN

Alias No:

Comp Served:

MFR:

Power Train:

Panel:

Elem. Drawing: NOT APPL

Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL

Power Source:


Comp Type: TANK.

Iso Drawing: 2-VW-529

Location: 4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTHWALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR

DC COOK Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-TK-76N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONINGNORTH CHILLWATER EXPANSION TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY



Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: CTRL RM AIRCONDIT RM - 4 FEET EAST OFTHE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE,AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEETABOVE THE FLOOR




4. Attached piping'has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottonvertical tank.


N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

S C L DE

~C


ANCHORAGE AND SUPPORT OF TANKACCEPTABLE BY JUDGMENT BY THE SRT FOR THIS SMALLTANK.

Small tank 2'n length x 9 " in diameter on a 1" diameter piping system. Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantelevered angle (2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 3/8") about 1' 6" long. Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to thereinforced block wall with 3 5/8" diameter through bolts (other side of wall Inspecied and bolts came through).

Glass site tube judged acceptable (no interactions).

Evaluated by: Date:




ID: 2-TK-76N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONINGNORTH CHILLWATER EXPANSION TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY


QJCT~I=S

Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: CTRL RM AIRCONDIT RM -4 FEET EAST OFTHE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE,ATTHE NORTH WALL, 7 FEETABOVE THE FLOOR

CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONINGNORTHCHILLWATER EXPANSION TANK

Coo

Component go, 2 TK 7~ ~ Class 2~

Any payticular area the Seismic Review Team should pay axtra attention to?Yes < No (If'es, check items that apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor ÃumberAnchor EmbedmentAnchor Edge DistanceAnchor CapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor CripAnchor Angulari~Concrete Crack<

Others (describe brieily)

If there is concern for Design Basi.s Discrepancy, circle the applicableitem and explain.

l.3.

Fardvare Naintenanc'a Type Discrepancyruling Update Type Discrepancy

Significant Operability/Dosi~ Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:WoH6

Actions Taken:

Prepared B nasa

12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Unit

0 - NSP CT 0 D T

AU'L ( 50'- Q" .

Bldg.%ÃTHWE,ST CORKP OF CbNTRQl. RIM AlR (.:I„'"„lT>gq s

ROOM IC WAL 1"0" AEOVF FLQClrLocation



Z.- Tl(- IC 0Equipment No.

R > g" x 4 "x I'-4"

ZI r~r'.IO~g e R{'.D 'ltllTll-{.UE<C

VUH'P.i

Wl

83+/ $

g4.'t&L~QOCK %I&44SEC TlQM "4-k"

I7A

Z >"x3"x~ra"—J Q LQ'iX 5'"+

Z'6 I'r"I

Z" Z."

CO

o~C.O>.-rL n-et; ~ PpUO

O C9

O 2.'Y.

~ ~O4/l

ZO&~usQy

n

t.4LI

+ amQ<S CRACWCD VC CBLIMG,ALSQ. MQPTAR BEl'WCCkl t"LQCI(5C RACKE.Q

~/s"4 5%6-ROD

0)-'EB5llED

%A'5'.5

SEC Y."2-K'ECT. 'Y -C"


~

~ ~ual./ ert.Reviewed by:

Construction

Date: C.-/

Date:Inspector

Date:Anc or Review Engineer


ATTACHMENT Np.


Dwg No.:

Weld ID

sizeLen hcracks


No

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesNo No Ho No No No

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YesNo No No No No No

Yes Yes Yes Yes'es YesNo No No No No , No

des1 ~ Fillet2 ~ Plug/s3.ot3 ~ Groove

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

(MGLC.N'ES ~ kFQQMQ 'REM.YVC.LD I ~ UMQCR<U'T AND FMDS OF AMC LE. H< '~e"I" QF 7Hz TOP HQR I "'TAL WELD I 5 CQ~~<~>WASHER

lh3IA;IA h'ijcH(QQNT~o ~i~ c

woaxi-G carr

AUG 181995

LKRKT

I

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 Noons ruc I.on e

Date:

Reviewed by:I

Verified by:ua

ons ruc won c or evxew gxneer

npsec orDate:

Pago 3 of 3Revision 1



FOR LARGE FLAT BOTTOM TANKSRAI ITEM 6

This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspectiondocumentation for the large fiat bottom tank evaluations requested in RAI Question 6. Includedin this attachment are the evaluations for 1-TK-33 (RWST) and 2-TK-32 (CST).

wquip ID: 1-TK-33 Txain: 12 Equip Class: 21

Drawing No.: 1-5144~

~

~ ~

.'ction: DRI

System: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK SUPPLY

Equip Desc: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK

Building: GROUNDS Room: RWST ARBA


Normal State: Desixed State: Powex Req'd:


Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status: NUCLBAR SR Min/Opt: MIN

Alias No: Power Train:

Comp Served: RWST

Mfr: GRAVER TANK AND MAMJPACTURING CO

Model: 420,000 GALS

"Elem. Drawing:

Wiring Drawing:

Power Source:

Walkdown: F Relay Bval : N

Comp Type: TANK

ISO Drawing:

Location: 25'ORTH OF UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT BUILDING.

>12 CHP 5021- CCD. 019ATTACHE'.NT NO. l

Un ti- 2- 3049

GA, ufo+Bl g.

25 HEPTA OI- Awrearr&T.Local on

lc- 33Insta at on wg. / Rev.


RW.S T

7~k. DiN&NCioM '.$ DIRx 5'2'- '5 ttlAH

2'5 ~C.&R STR~ Q &@A~( SB& hJRcy pa.g9 poP, aT~ ncvWg<g

gHC CT'%Re (S SW1 PraOuHO ~ e. ~~w~ c~~ p,~<< /$4 ove 'e (e% ro4

TH@ SoTTOM oF Ttl@

~t46- GF ~ >(g CIaeug~ WCP TeS V~ T'tb array'OOR.IS TA.imM) fH ~~~ I ~ NX,l- Pagan .

AROOHO SNaoTH MO They ~~q Faorn

~ll4) TO YQ ( F R12T QF T~ '2 Gtl>S ~ <0 FtC.SCL)SV:—To

'4~&/ $6 ~$ 6 0 F r~ nC'e'7~& <~aiI mZ ~Su~>oa),

INDIANAI/ICHIGAN POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

OCT kB tSSZ

LERKT

Date: IQ-1 t2D te:

Drawn by:Verifiod by:

gga . Ce . ZnspectorReviewed by: 2

Cons ruct on Anc or Review Engineer

Page 1 oi'Revision .3

'(

I

0

> 12 CHP 502 1 ~ CCD ~ 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

B g.

Insta at on dwg. / Rev.


'2S NOR t H OF NOTWWYYI~.TLocat on

'l-TK.-33Equipment No.

r=C+3uau

>/II"<is'w IP I e < O u>q

OMrI'S 'NIIYI~hS Ceo~Q

OI 3/br'" norns

TRt4K.

a4., 4

,44 s

4~ 4 ~

a

INDIANAMICHIGAN POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLEIi

WORKING COPY

Ot;T 15 1995

LERK +

SECT.'A A

8 ~04T 66 tYRACVAW~Q.AT~ S~gg 4p M~All(.+K STRFtP (DCThiL

c.av~a b be. measu.va a.c.cu.va4)T hue Q~ iv su.tokoav 'F 'adi~ S

Date: 1G 1Drawn by:Uerified by: Date: /<'-

Qua . Cert. InspectorReviewed by: Date. l 0-13- '9'X

Cons ruct on Anc or Rev ew Engineer

Page 1 of 3Revision .3

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANKBuilding: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25'

OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING.Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANKAND MANUFACTURINGCO. 420,000 GALS




3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to orgreater than the demand..



Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

COJg NINES

~

~

SRT: George G. Thomas and Tom Huang on 10/5/930Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'-0" liquid tank). Tank manufactured by Graver Tank,made of ASTM A240 Type 304 Steel, 420,000 gallons and weighs 94,000 lbs. Anchored with 25 3/8" th x 5" w x

4'4"

long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.

A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG GIP criteria as part of the Stevenson 8 Associates report"Earthquake Analysis of D.C. Cook NPP Refueling Water Storage Tank Subjected to Nozzle Loadings to Originaland Current Design Criteria", September 12, 1989.

The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concretewas sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.

The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and1.72 for shear. The calculation is included as a document of this SEWS.

The tank is founded on a concrete pad per drawing 0 1-2-3048.g4

Although anchora the straps were not rusted to the degree that the SRT judged the;e should be reduction incapacity. A flin ing of the walkdown was that these straps should be cleaned and painted to maintain their integrity.

Picture 2, Wk. 1, Tm 2, Disk 1- Pipe at the Bottom of the RWSTPicture 1, Wk. 1, Tm 2, Disk 1 - Typical Rusted StrapPicture 3, Wk. 1, Tm 2, Disk 1 - Buckled out Anchor Strap

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANKBuilding: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25'


Evaluated by: Date:

/~ -zg-

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: Seismic Evaluation of The RWST

OC Cook Unit1SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Meat ExchangersDescription: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANKBuilding: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25'


5 «I

!g5(Sl'') )I

Buckled out Anchor Strap

Pipe at the Bottom of the RWST

)

c

„"5'

5

'I Eyj

Rusted Anchor Strap

4l

'h p

P

1

+ pshsg

"'„"',ggr~ t

STEVENSONR ASSOCIATES

a IlruclaiknoCnanlcalccinclnng englnnnrlng flan CC,( WCC! 4 Ev AL Q AT (a4

0

a,~ (a5 v8

I3I-, I

(J s

IL :O'

+np. n.C. ERIC

I/7

g~r~i ~ !~!'y

pIIL.~~8~~ / rs( PJ7 I

r-i -rl

~ ~

I I jd7

+ t

.I.h.k.+As.g„( !

e..IH ~LC SgWI I I

I

Ii

I I

gLCJ f!~ I

I

~ I 'I

$!

f 6 cnI„. Q,uy ~i>~~<.I.

I I

i rr 7

I 'I

Ir

I I ! )

! i I I I I

Id,i

Il

I I ~ s ~

.Li 1~2.C (I.Ms ' i

Is ~ ~

I I 1

.CD&.iiI 7

7 I

I I IP 'H ~ .: —-'25 ~

I+

Li l

i II

o~ qi gA~—r- j

I I 1j

+I rV'-~—! (',C I(~ ..mI I " I

I i ! I 7

' I

7

Mod .'C gI i I

Icn e)

!I- .i. I I ~ ~ t ~

C' Ial ~ O'. - PPl /~C~ .OJ L klI ~

II

Qgl

I

rh I I ~ ~

~I i~

I ~~

~ 77

I Acct(a 'r< I 8 a~II I

II j

(D'MC.I(.C'B~AuD

2$

pig II'7 Is

I

I ~

~ ~ r

I j

j

SUBJECT

nt 4 I

SHEET OF'BO Z-

NM > zan0RcJ

STEVENSON5 ASSOCIATES

0 Ifn»clUTCHnechonlcotcon»vtttng engtneeltng ttt»n

NS - ~. C e PP

L.t~

I I II I 'I

.«

I! i ~l IRQ.C.—I a. <

)p~ pI I I

w~J. E,DclsPLLt c eL. Pp~i,~I,'pm, sb~~.FI,EE .

I .'!»

i i

~M.4 P~(A.'IFtIP/

tti i l t

MBLc~Ik

t

!r,aT ~~i

I~ et- c.~'a~A

~j: . SWJI

Q,»ti m PgI ~

':)3~'.ca:~: l g cc.Ec.~ ~

Cw:.~)—' —C- ~- -'. -' -::-Ce)-- -'.--'C~-">-'-.----' C~>--'--:I ' I

I . =.Ii '] I i I Tl I

I. C.'Z CC.

j . z 6 ...,..''..5;. t .: '.,:2 ~ .'. ]!

~ T ! ~ I »

~ I

~..l l %. O i

W,O iI

I i II .,o.5:G. ~,

~

i09''.Z-»

I . tAEFA=. n . t.

IIt~

»I~~I1i

I I

+I I 4

~ II i I

! I ~, I I

i ''I 7 8,

I i'e:~I

~ I

i 'II~ .PM~K

7 + Z,- o|r,b,

I 'I

I I i .,2AT j

l

~I

I

Ii

1 ! i~ ~ e*., i., I. ~ ~ t

!.i.C,tq-.J Z.dD .. VZ0Q.Q,~IS.g»-! M~ I

fl>gs q

P,s to»I s .in F. .,'E.F», a!FFE.c.'rP-'. FE,

i P

I

g,r s~o a.etcE» ~-4-CM~-E M~ —4/t.l ~ TEI m.

.cc'AGAN n.A '~a 6 c~,~~a.@~'~w~.s..y c.'F-M.c..ks.

jpJ t

i!

i )

rex tpU ws.( ~-~, p- ..Ei'.A.,c:)ir..'< h,»~<. J»FAG,P.h EA.kaI„P'nk ..i.m~46+S.IV S ~P-,A..

n.p. !

WHX., H,z.& .

t.D~I I

IC C IFFY

I2 E

i

I I ~

lI i

» I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~rr—f ~ ~ ~ I ~ II

P~ H~C ~C. k..I

Response SpectraEOASP 1.0

08-03-1989

g V ~ ~

FREO

1. 0. 102. 0.133. 0.164. 0.205. 0.256. 0.327. 0.40a. O.5O9. i 0.63

10. 0.7911. 1.0012. 1.2613. 1.5814. 2.0015. 2.51

DAMP.050

9.872E-031.790E-022.700E-023.660E-024.832E-026.133E-b27.518E-029.276E.021.219E-011.434E-011.702E-012.040E-012.357E-012.604E-012.834E-01

DAMP.040

1.008E-021.846E-022.794E-023.798E-025~043E-026.432E-027.920E-029.817E-021.306E.011 '40E-011.838E-012.217E-012.572E. 012.849E-013.108E-01

1/3

FREQ

16. 3.1617. 3.9818. 5.0119. 6.3120. 7.9421. 10.0022. 12.5923. 15.8524. 19.9525. 25.1226. 31.6227. 39.8128. 50.1229. 63.1030. 79.43

DAMP DAMP.050 .040

2.288E-01~92~+ 2G'$~

~05&91~~1Qv3BH. Ql~~1

0&612A78E 01

3.066E-01 3.371E-013.290E-01 3.629E-013.292E-01 3.630E-012.937E-O'1 3.208E-01 fo

+'.591E-012.809E-012.337E-01 2.514E-012.20?E-01 2.367E-01

t'.Zc 2. 292E-012%38~1

2/3

5 2 - ~6'5cf- P-EF

SHEETM~Ol42.~

g~ S-S

*

\'I

'STEVENSONR ASSOCIATES

a Ittuatu)CHnechanlcafconsul)lng cnglnccnng nrrn

2)2,.e

C+ ,4 23( I

. I 8 aS

~'o ms 4wi ! I

L j

(I I l IO'Oi I I I

~.s g 0 C., 3-8J~ C.H&l?=~ I I I w4w~w..PaEWEf=mA I

I I f I'~-V'nil p~ '.T F~

l I f I I j I' I j ""'

.G.~~r~.b.of e.&v . 'C,fw.C.A IA, . C~~~~.~) <.~'

~ I T!. „. c.„.) i . A &,c .y'.g f g, LV J.f,a „4 ~oi,7 I,rl &.6)„kd.MQAG.=Ex P' wv.'

JI ! I: I I

I

I j > ~ I ~ I~ I

I .io'z <~~I

! ' l I L'' '-I wi.i

,b..~.f,a C .y... 8. V..... VZa .,O L ..fd .. CV.Cv'6S..~

l ~

I Il ~ f" i, * ', I I I I I I

l

~pi 4

I II

: c.~~S~4./i'T

ri-i'5

jI

I I ~

/05 5"73

( I ( I

5l

Ii 3 M 'Ao

I ( I i ! ( II! I

'

I l1

~ ~ I

I i I ~lII

I I f II

~

g '" 3cO+J ji

j=.o, a Ol ....Ua CD

;.3'~lI

l

I

STEVENSON'ASSOCIATES

a IinrcturojtnochonlcotccnsuNIAII oncinooring Ilrm

SUBJECT~&~IC P6 JOB No.'e" ''' 'J 'u'..C 'C' *Q,P.P

s(ig CPS'Q e-s.-eOCII

III

c o

~ <C

! T li

Tn I+I+L! II ~ J M!5~

~c~ (~~.E~E. k'~~a I oj~ N'"=RE..~

„C '4:.'...orrT=.. I.~!O 'O.j I l.

g. opj

I

Assio «([a

II , nM.Ir

II

T'

I ~ I II~ ~

<6,P. "..==.I.-I I

J+ 'L . Q~'~p.'i:MC'tj C.C K I

i~ }

I

!: I (

I I I I I

! o8~ I, ~

I I I ' I i

~'

I 4

.:,4 c.cI I I

I

I i r«T $'-'a'

'Z.Z .I"~l I

tI I '

~ Qoi i 34~I oI da

, (''6

II ~

I

T ~

r

I i

SUBJECT sosi(0. ++<'1<~7'HssTMa oFEPM

,;-.'STEVENSON8c ASSOClATES

a ttructutoHnechantcotCohuttt«JQ cttglttcctut(I tttttt

5 (

KO «C

j I H l -X,.9

.~. ~J3.6~ j

j L l j

j jt

I~

tI

I ((

tI 1

t I I, (I

«J

I (

j

«MC P '- B ~ 0 4<WGR 'lJJ!~««««I. P Q P mJII

J Q g S Q~ P'4 e l W jy~C't i j

I

il I.!2QI ~

$ 4«

L Ia4-I

j ~~+~ I I-

Ii «j i

I~ I !

t « ~ I '«j3

~ i I ~ I!

'. I I . (

~ « ~ I ~ ~~ I ~ t I

~ 4 S.E GAA.P H.D~ I ~ ~-~L~ a.t/,~ 6='. I I

~ « ~

',.'; . Sj ..'S~P..J @ .—.....,: G'.c~.—.gg;,~.~ i~a I .'t-.'. o....PP-.E'.'.s:~a.+:~ L~a g.;pl@&'C(A D — 6 H.tat I Q ' p, g~( g i.Jci ~ ((«-tc'; T (7): ~ I

I~, Il

I

t

„„.«0 (~ ~

I *',~ ~

plHr~ ..I

j lQ,'./g....j:,...Z 0 ...I.:~, =i j.'.. +

..)=. J <' >~ p»

~ « I '«-c--II . !

P.

Pp

STEVENSONh ASSOCIATES

a IttuotWOHneChcnlCOICchfttltlttg OttghtOOttttg tttttl

I=IDXOttt)ItlIK

t-trg.

I ~ t I~ ~ I I

' „/ 9?~

( .'I ! ( ' t I

' 'Ig TLIg~iQ~

l ((

j~(

K<M .c aA PA44

t t I .'j

~ I

L.. t,bI

t r I

t~ I

/ trr 4

r'

r* I I

) 1

3 ' ~

I ~

I IA/I

It. E8'.I WN

D~.. DE'te."I I

y

~ ~ ~

lt

x.EI..~ ~

H.rw4R:.:,LoAD „cd'ir I

I ~

I

I r I

SUBJECT JOB Ng ~ r! s Ils—S/'s.s

O'ZcJ V-S-S

~/rI

'TEVENSON8c ASSOCIATESccnrvttlng ongrnooltng trim

~-Dc. .RP;~

LL Qs„+ 3„ O

LID

5 PEP

> 8 e, aaL,7J

KJI

r4>. w

I t~S..H.- fc i~

I

iI I

s

I r ~

s I

I

'..w c a~@'„!I . „> I I ',;

I', IIJ ~>cp.p~Liri'Tlc>,nJ—r-- ~'- — "-- —" ~ - ~ = ~

II II ~ ~

.5 WE,P I /.Q..... g.j..~C+ 5~CT*e icI:7- +);:

I

I

i

l q) S zap (...ID,....-... 2.>I

r I " r '

iL.J

.'A.R.E....!.. W nH:C.c ~I

DQ I 4I ~.tt

4 9~g~cA.&Qr

~ ~

I~ ' i ' lt I

O..~ + H. Q I pQ p ~i~ f jig nI Lp~p.+ ~g~ I I

i ~ I

.. A-.M....,.. -'S ~L?'FPI'l'-I Cia I 7.O „:...Eg.5g.g/i;.. 'Z:B.Ai..+8;CQ~

'~

~ I Ir

~ l t.'L.<mrt,a ww<. CA~+.c,.( mv'.I.Ij ~ ~ I

c . 6 6; J..I.S&~3

I'

4? I r.'C) I&.&I C p4( I, I ], I

I II

~ ~ r «'t ~

! I'.C n.y~: I

(..I (.

I ! ~ s ~ I ~

.FI I I

' ' I . ( ''I ~ I

i'R2's/I('

IL. Li

-,.V~ ~,

r r

>0-r—~".I

I IN

\

I t

I '-I 1

r'r'V '. I,.Ll, I

I'

M rI

I I I II> ~

's

I vrl st I:lsr «rr rT'.rs,! s,

'i'

I~ !

'I j

J

II/I rl ~3. I— s-... I

I I j

~ ~

I jI *q ~ r

t '!

I

II

: L,=..2+% ~;L.. ICE, I/. '

I!——

Il l I

I

~ .,r

s i" R'„ I ~ II t

~ II I ~

tI

r. $ sL ~ II I i

r ~ !

SUBJECT i'A,VV.v.

STEVENSON8c ASSOClATES

O ItnIClwalmechoNcolconsaNng cnginoc!Ing II!m

P ~cv C

Q.A/A~ g vll.X

A

l

AA~c- !i .TT''i,y~.+ 'ip

i

L

L tk~~. 3.l.8,i ~ I

wP.EC

Lam~

8 'e 'A'.Pm Je'~.c.d'i

i I i

I

P.I-.A.-I6 8 B,Nm4~ ~ v p

cI'I ='.!ri, g./JAN 'J,: 4 i'j ps';pv~i lDa lij~~ns A

-

I ' ~

c5 = . Q''(y.e+$ 5c +=',,Lel... C? 'ps i !os.d 2%co'p~

S,UR E vvj E .~ c.c A, FIc c- 'l.=,$ 5. ~i >/z'..".)..!2 =,«!>."~7,.%„,~J

C

I v

:„, .. t=wLQ f g.'wg.nL.v'... „~P g~~ P '. P C..~'a I,.PC&,..~~..,...C!g.a ~i,a P..'.,:

l I ! 'i~ \ I

! i ~

'I~A Bee. '!N;v.D.i'~. G' .HK'.~rL DA &~'~

L

~ ~I I i ~ ~

L t.:,'=.: >' rZ.: CZI .) .=..2S;,3;:W ..2.>..~

H ~ r~.~ ~ A c T'~ '~i T A,c.v.e~.'~+!AacMk ~i+.vv< ~i . ~, I !

> J,5 i i PA (rTVV ' ~ T V~/aREFnR .Py~g.I I -, I l v I < I ' ! ! I I t; I ~

'

.i~ ''a mZ!~ vi vL.. '.C'e SvILA~Kv iv'Ev'.'I I;!: I l: l I'.! I!

L

: R.I,S~...:.H-C'.,CW . ~o.GS .APE ~4.9.:4: ..~B 'EF~Q.460

I I ' I I I P I „< „, i ~ I

.* . I ) - . 0 ~ .T

L

!

—-I—- —.—,-,—.---,—!—.;——,—,,————,'PC I, 'ai-I PL a '~ '. I '&I

f"Il r. T-' ' '! '

'. J, j: ..'.LL~S v.D'~ &rH.! = I2'C~7S)+!O'LZ,.5D=.I ?:'i i ! ! I ! ! .:.;: ! i Y"'.vvc iv'v. 'w' f7

E'...,.....,,......v....,. „..... g,v . /.. T,...!i .....,J.L.:....'.. I.: I ;', . ME~OI...CAP,...= I Z,5. (,. VCIP) ....; '8;, C7~..: ".3.;. l..7. 67,>C~.=. ~

~ w v I ~ ~ 'A» vd ~ v v ~ JA « ~v v 4 v ' ~ v 4 4 V4 lv

~s ~„2."s

SUBJECT S I ~ I+ ~ JOB NI4.+

vl I id


a IIIIIChslCIIIIOChcnleolconiutiinIIengineering turn

0, . C.o

MKOIo

IIIK

f~ZZ

37" 7"~ I QI,'iT I I I I s

I

e~L'~C ~I

* '1!, 1 5 so..='e..~

I iL

r ~i$ qf-rPAL

I

'. ~ERE( F,'M.Lm. < wWCR &i~~

lM .

oCT

I,s

'9fz „'l~r

~g C I .~.$ .I.m„<.,5,I

1 M Pr4Di.PR=~,LED ag.c.". '

I

rI ~ l ~

dOSi I.Py~&$ a my'~I

II II I

II ~ ~ I I ~ r ',''.I I I l lglr

I'4 $ P.~c.c-.a

~

'..,H

ctv E „~m ..8.<„

.]c

.O.u R.. I&..er

.II- . ~,.CT.I.t .a

I

I'M.C}=i+D e MA 4 C..lc 'i

I. e,~c.r .nsr..~ J '.

I

l 'A.hDI

ta,~i@ES.'t W.~..~ ....(.~l! L I ' I i

.Q» ~..C .... C.C a.I~ ''.ua iI j.W C. !,n.Wr~g-".„.,Sq-..'ygPZ~I

L'e~ k~~.', a.~. .'.. '.:~..~ .. ~~.g i...S 'n U.C-. '.U. S,Z.:. —:..+.6; '. ! '. I..,II

Prs co+.sP=L.na sruti .or.'-.'-.rs 6 I CiZ ..I ,'I III.f

S M rE- .~'~ ——r II ! i

I

II ~ * r I

~ s I

I—I ', rs

I

j

I ', II 'II

~ I - ~

I

I r

Ir ~

Ir,I

s

't t r ~

~ ~ I

ss I ~

~ ~ ~ \ ~

I r I ~ I

I II r w

r rI~ r

rr s

~ r I

I II I

II I

\

t~ 4

SUBJECT C ISnn I

* oa er- PJOB No. ~~+~ +~~ SHEETglll Ol4~

STEYENSON5 ASSOCIATEScenteIIInii englnoednII nrm

OIi)

illCC

iI

4.

+~i i;I

J ~„L

I L

II

~ll~ i i

I I I

~ iI I

i3 I

I i! ii ~iI

8 Ec5!~ ., l''

. i i

Ip

i I Q„l

I I I

L,

8!7 i

I. 5

I ' I

I If

I

I

IIt~

I II

i I :.2MLI

'.3

I7 C;3LiI i,:I l I I

I .F~.a ]i

I II~ ~

I

":!I

I

I

)II'

g'< ii IgA

IP'I

.l.+J IO'.II.SV..S =J.)IL>~~

i A

I I, II ~

,hlA~u P.B )

i ~

i

~O.g~v fo'~ II i

)=N 4-.c-cn&lrACsd~'lI I t-.)C +i.X4D 8

i i

t

W,

l

!

SHEET~~~ '~~STEVENSON

5 ASSOCIATESconwNng onglnoorlng Irrm

O

~/5I

I

21E

2 h'

I l

!-'

e

!8 ~I F ~'u.l2.4'I

v

J hAAv=~ ~~1

g+s

. ss ..DI

l'

I e Ie

PC <5'IW'V: a f-

e~! l l lI I '

I

1

l

.h~ ~

Ie

1k

! I: 1 ~ r I l

H.K L(xP2. '~~I I 1

I

l~QtJ I

Ttt& kr

I I e I

! I !

I I I I

l..i

I iI

e I

Lr g e& ~e 32 ~ 2

I I I I~

1~

i 1 I1—'-i

I i i l J'E

I

Dj i 1-8-:5

--f1

J

e e e ~

e

e e

l M1 '.. 3.6I:..Ft'.E.'.MM.A. HE. H .' 4 Z6«<4

e

e

I

4

e

l,j I

J I I

II

l. ~ lI

l

I

i l

I I ' i 'I . II ~

~ v r i~»~ e»e»e'~EE~


O Itiuolvrolctt4Chorticolcoriirrtttrco 44QIA44rtog Itrrri

SUBJECT JOB No. (-I+

I «J.

SHEETBL+ 'OfJQ- 2-

RM'F-S-'' CCCC:

rir «~ "I

, P 8+~ ~ C

2K. 2hz I

-i~t 5—t

zfz 8Se'~. 3M'e6 ~~a ".

, JC,(M gi ~7

L3~:

~+If~

fg 5

I ri(

I

r

II I

r 1~( y.g I~i! I'l(

I(

~ ~ i -~~

I'

. rI I

J~C I

C'

~C \ r ~ ~

. ~ ., ~ ~,.r,,„.. r i+-,

i

nrr~l4 ~1

(!, I Ir ~ - '

II " . *"

II

5

o« «.«",f=rr r . I.="pa cr o-c,«..r,r rrr«rcrff;ao aa.6$ *««r.«f r rrw

I J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ *I ~ I

I I

!. '.f, u P T- )

Mphil

Ql 8 A 0 ES P 5„h CP X„7- I('gP%gW jFi-,F X'u''R~ 8

C 1

7. I{I=..„.,S~! 5 ! ! (

~J,DMH Atua . HANS

L

Ecvz.a~ 0I

FRE.uEZ,C.r. C.r=., OV..A.I .I i~.6..RI'Xi'Oa .OF .4''

r H EROS JJIM O

4 ( LJC C~.HI ~+~ 8++r ',, '

.re.J..g:S.. AS ..A„:.CS H ~f f e~VSC-~,H.'rI i I

!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r '

=. ~ C ~ ~ ~

r

A5s~ v K ggQ ~JP- 8' ! l~

I"

I

pl+( I~l

I

I

(>rI

!(-~4—

( I r ' I ! IIrW 4,! ...,. 3,'5.'L4r? .EIIr... MMs

U 5.(.g,Q, > ~ ~~ i." QP'

I( A. I

~'.~l,'~w~ ~F.v. s. PPP.&x f M.A.+ f ~M««c ~H prrA rrc rL.....CCI g Sg hl,~q.u

j I ' i l l I; I 5

8 g(g.~C~I f!,'~c

(I

i, t 4» wt

IC

'r ~ « - r

r r~,; i ! ! ~ I l jr... ~ '.. ~ ~ ', ~' a« ~ !

'"k»'» r~ Irk

I»

~ rI8 ~

:-. STEVENSON'.-.; „'. at, ASSOCIATES.';".' a It»I»CttltattnootlantCOI» ~

' Ctcttttlg 0tlgtt»00tttlg tits

» ~

kk

SUBJECT I ' JOB No. Ik

I» A~VA i t~ W ~ leP. ~t f O

Ill.k=!»»F-'»'—'b

5~trYI ~ '

I'C

n"' f

I »»

~ I I} ((J

LIJ TI~ t

jt

gjI

',li& Br~~

i ij I .'J- i+

-5I '

l CI-

~ Z

~ I I I ~

5

l.Z,. P (c 2SI

o+z)

o2> cQoQ

(2e+

4/g 4

~ '

STEVENSON',.', & ASSOC3ATES~ o structrrroHnechohtcotCOIN(tthg Oh(t(hchfthg (If!ill

CVP u Arc~ n(-

0!ft

(t

KcJ -S-8'

J> VV>VI>M> IJ

}

II

t

~','

3 i

3

t~ t

3

}!

!i }

~ t }

f; i

I = I

3

i~

> ~

I1

3

IJ

II

]~!3 I ~

1 4 ' }(

4I I

I t

}+I

J '

(4 P y.fj, t 4

I}

v

4D A i >}r. I(—I(

+-

II

I1 I

I I I

L

3

! i~ ~

I t t~

3~ ~

3 k- ~

4

3

I

I4 I

I~ I ~ ~

I ' '» ~ 'IL

SUBJECT

C

STEVENSON8('ASSOCIATES ' 6@ G c

o )ftucfut~cf)otucoftuA)uN(thg OtlglhOOflog fltm

~

'OB No. +++ j +~~

zO

~ IIH(IT~OIII

N 9 cP'-5-8).'C. '-,y>,'pt1 ', lh

't'C ~

C s R

. Si C»

I,'i

~~

I

I I

a Ii g'W7 P~„~!

I X~ESS~ C.6.„I i ~ ~

t

~.i.S'~At.8'VT'I.O.+

~ I

~ ~

I )

R!"I~, i

IL.

~ I ~

~ '

I

iI l

I Ie I I I

i!

) j, I

t~I

Il I

&i% .

j ! !EQ R.~I

!

I

tI I I I~ c Dr~t-.

~ ~I l ~:, I i

' i(

&r. O..~.&.W.R.Q.;.):6,C EO Sm )4I':~ ~OK.

D'~ ~ s 4.~,'<w~nP,~c.~~ urn+

~ I i I i ! tt

II I

l C.35o+-I

( D/p—

~ ~ i IE:j M I ~ i 'C ~tV'„C fi..4!.D '.E't ~..~~: '

)I ~

I

~ ' I I

.I ..Pg, . S.O~(=ty 't=)j. „Crt,igPP C.A.C

I~~ . ~ . t

~ I ~ -I a ., ~, ) ~,, 'I ~,, ~ ~, ~ ~ t '1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ., ~ ~ . ~ ~, ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~

~ I

g

:0

'0

STEVENSON'I

ASSOCIATESa Itn(cturotrnochontcol

coewWng eng(noortng firm

h

E

E

(~smr

E

I ~ S

9$ c(=

Ir

E

2

)I

I I

+ ~,.~rs 5'o I I

Q ~I

I)

LGJI

I

II

, S I

I ( rr ~ ~

+&,l

ln,sac 8&

Vt5>QW

I I -" /

'i (s3! ~( I (

JVl

( J.2 o5.k

'Q Lo521 I

:Cpp

(

I I

8&m

4) I ( II I

"i

i ) l i

I ~

i~~7 IE

L.'I X- CE L

I (a gi

)

.j LI

. L

tt d

II

0

STEVENSON8; ASSOC1ATEScont)itttng entttneerlntt tltm

i UP7 tmA C F- ej &5 m r I

-P. c

)

SHEET '4~~0

Ctt -s-z0Itt

Ut

~ L~~l~f !

7(o 'iI (,I t .'o.+77gg

cate jM~~ ! i '

S.~~a.oJjR,O . I P.~~~V"4" .!jct B

I 'R-O t'<5~Lt'QF 5 t:.SIC'R b

j~jt

I )

l t l

I1 ~

! i I

I 3; 4't) ~~,if

'OS)),

J+i I ~ j.„„D C„I 7 ~ .~R C ~„....~i +, Q pent')'

i <~ ~- .,r' " SVZ

-,'ace.II"lo) ','.c)n7 '.""co s t)'i(3-'j,s',—'

~ I

'I

~ ~ ~

P „ i 3 35 5~

~ I I ~ ~ ~ * - I J

i ~ '5'

~ ~j ~ ~ I I i i I I l~I ~) L

I l It

.'...5 Q ~pj, ij... h/+~ +i

i'P

jc~ ''l

~&.2itt t

pea (

2-.2 ..p,e I..... y .J3.3.4%9;.K 5;....'P ~ t.','...., y.:.= H CC3.C

.'+ 5.O ..t) S'.i. ',Ir.i=.:.37 'rr

t.(n.,o po F

.J'4-n p~g

l

t ~ it, tt)

III ~ ~ I ~

f'"

It

~I~.....'3.,5.Q .p.s,.l,, =„...

tlj'' I ) I JI I

.= 'J&.2.: ..! ' I ~ II I ~ I

++ tt ~.3.l.f P s.i =.='.=.(

''t

f ~~i( * \ ~ ~

4 . A ~ « IA 4 ) I~ A'y

I 5 i I joi \ i I . I ~ I t ti J I ! I I I I i i I ~

r„'ai<Q,

r'rotrr, s

,„;.; ";.'TEVENSON'"'- Ik ASSOCIATESo slructuroirnochonlcol

consurrrng ongrneerlng tlrrn

SUBJECT (C 'OB No. ~DC l~u'i(~c

'' AP.R

V)zOrrt

cc

ss ssr@~orrt< ~.~l~sls

4/ ~5 ~g

s n-s ~ fs"s s~0

s rats c."J

~ri;, ~ .

r'M

t J'.K L'u .P,.i

l~r.....s .. l ic k,.to y. I'P.~i

gH~ Im~r

( (~g ~.~™)M<.csO.A .a.,&,5

, i C.s „..MH ./i AsJ,rtc s.~~~ ~>

Q 2

IO+'(-

=,3 2 co .'c' rc....'-ps)r r ~

F R I=-~ w.(.a.k'. ~'..:.7~L ~ L~I A.w~ ~..$ , p'.ig.'<i,.4 t.C .Pg;:C.~ 5 sJ r(c:C ~

FF~ 8 D.A.n'< E.,rt r. h:e r~ ! . t p'I.Q 6, .J., Cl t g r. o 4

rI r r I ~ „( (

EL

,'„3 4 5+ ~ ..I n. J .

if~I

7 Q I, r, I

8S x lc ~HZ -(. 2 359t i ~

IL

l ~

I I

I

«',H..p h'.. J ' WnJ'g,g ~< ~ '.s-r,~ ~ „.Ent.C .t W.'.~r,,<~~t„l CI

I = 2-;

I I i3/a(e da ~ I

r it i

e 4.+z '~I

I

I r II

~ -. '

I

~ 1 '

iLsd i .8-Q

rns~MML

r'L~ ~- 1

I

~ 4 CC,

)C

f

~','TEVENSON .

.- 8CASSOClATESO Ithfotchc<<hOChoh<CO<

cohfcfltlhp cop<hoof<tip hfhl

SUBJECT

Ar )'

G.O'S < —.'G:c. c.~! A PP . ':~

'OROV)

U<

SHEETS~™PF gP ~ '

~.<r

r'O

<5j $ < &S

++!iI

'C I~OI I

I !'

,'5o.8I

I ~

Jt0~$ I xI +-l-

3I

)~!iI I

I T9-W!~UL3.ed1

~C iI .~

I1, '

~ ~ ~

~ I ~ I ~ I

~ ', j

W'7 ff' 1 i c I ~

I I r, I I~ 1 1 r

1" I

I I

II

I I II

II

I I II

I C

SIO I~~ I5 + x In.~B' ~~v5'3'f ~ ~~ R <j~.. I 8

f

l I i

.,.7.e.Z), W, L- Z d,27 ~,g 4~E!,Q~ ~) I +-I I ~ ~ I

<.. ~ .I I i

~! I M ~'Z. IV

~ ~I <

~

~ ~ 1

I II I ~ ', ~ . I !

i I '' ~ ~

(J g.a I S.,i,)(,~.4 ...,E,0<~I.Oa. C.C-„ =A<„< S .FuP-rt.v<..<S„.. i og-I !

I

rI 1 I I r r I I

~ ~

I I: . ~ . ~ ~'. I; I ~ c

I~ ~I+,+<<., ~

1 I ... ~ *r . ~~,. 1 .C...I .c ~ ..Ar

~'r c rcr, ~ a. e~c '

'.....I-rhrrrf....;,.IKSS:S.... e&l ~:. S 'E +,:='.+. (C26 CClCS..)i..

4 J

SUBJEGT ~ c. ri, jOBMJ:-J33C f55 9..'.'SHEET/2 I B~2Z::+Ac Y <g.. f-

d Wc'-5-STEVENSON

8c ASSOC}ATESO ItnjclllloH54Chonlcol

conIIJINny englneerlny ntm

0EO

~ 'I~"

IJS ~ J S k

I7 axe

~ I

cn+

} I I;" }

~ ~

I

,po

I II

1~ .

7p~ I I

i r~) I

I ~J

i

1 R !8 ~ C-~iP'IO~IE.<~L E ~

'I

}I

i

C

}

A P'+ ! )'pl '. Qg t4'5(o 4 ~

4 R. EI

». 1.F.U<~<6.%3:[ a~I?=Aj C

L ..

S~IE- JJ JI

I ~ I) I

I ~ ~

1

,.Z. B&'~ I I

SZ,I2 O

IAI

i g

01l

R

h

>'I

'1 1 1terrrr 14 r rA ~ 1 rt

SUBJECT '~ Wr ~--t;tt r~g

~ V.tri

':4"""~~"STEVENSON""''.-';;:

"..'-".: 8t ASSOCIATES" '-'„,

conrurrrnp enprnaorlng nrrn

Ok &/ . "T et e:i ii'~ >."""'11 +'" X0ro

UIcr. .".ggq Jt..r" rut-r ..rt)tpf.

pPi

3 ~ I ~

~Res 4~I

ct W~ 8.~

604 SW.'t52,4 ++

~ ~

~i ' '~l i~

I I

g

'7+-8+1-.(-1I t

ZSB- Z S.'8 '

~

I

.I e ~

I I I I I I

4 ~

~iP-..C

~ ~ ~

QQ)8' 'I

I2S.SII I I2.B,B:, . 5 IA

I I! .f.'g tI

,w C.1 !Let.

1 r

<J g ~~i~s4!f. k. '- (.8j 5. pc Wff..rf'~ J1 ~ ~ I

It I

, ('7 4rtt Ct~

I.'real

I' g,

rr

r

--~lr

(g~,gg) i

I I I

II

t I

'CAP II I

1

I

t. t 2) + (7O,>u)(J

(to 4. Q

I+

~ g'++; ~ 'h3' i

'I l

1 I ~ 1

~t

I

Ki~S < J)

~ I ~ ~

V

Equip Id: 2-TK-32 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21

'ng No.: 2-5106A

Function: D

System: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK SUPPLY

Equip Desc: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK

Building: GROUNDS Room: INNER PLANT GROUNDS

Elev: 609 Sort: Sg Notes:



Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN


Comp Served: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK

MFR: GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO., INC.

l: 500,000 GALS.

Panel:

Elem. Drawing: NOT APPL


Power Source:

Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N

;i'omp Type: TANK

Iso Drawing:

Location: 50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME



ID: 2-TK-32 (Rev. 0)Description: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK


Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANTGROUNDS - 50 FEET SOUTH OFTHE UNIT2 CONTAINMENTDOME

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK& MFG. CO., INC. 500,000 GALS.



2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments'is equal to or greater than thedemand.




Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

E P El IC

COJHI)LES

SRT: George G. Thomas and Tom Huang on 10/5/93

Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height. Tank manufactured by Graver Tank, made ofASTM A240 Type 304 Steel, 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs. Anchored with 30 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'4"long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.

The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 refueling Water Storage Tanks (RWST) 1-TK-33 and2-TK-33. The calculation for the RWST.resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in theconcrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.

The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST. The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodologyindicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear. Calculation is attached to the SEWS of1-TK-33.

Comparison of significant attributes of the tanks is shown below:

RWST CST

48'iameter31'iquid Height25'trap Anchors

52'iameter31'-7" Liquid Height30'trap Anchors

For shear the tanks are essentially identical since the demand and capacity are both proportional to the area underthe base.

4%,h

II

's'.il r



ID: 2-TK-32 (Rev. 0)Description: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK

Class: 21 - Tanks and Meat Exchangers

Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANTGROUNDS - 50 FEET SOUTH OFTHE UNIT2 CONTAINMENTDOME

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK8 MFG. CO., INC. 500,000 GALS.

ELXUHIR

,, jest

7T

y4)4X, h P

~ o'p ht ~

g t h

2'uckled

Out Anchor Strap

Pipes at the Bottom of the RWST

+*12 CHP 5021.CCD.O].9ATTACHMENT NO.

I- K-30B g.

'2 Tg-'7'4Location

Insta at on wg. / Rev.

Anchora e Arran ement SketchEcgxxpment No.

~gDGg<RTE KToRRG6 fdicIi

DIN&4«od.->< DIp g s4.-S/< %AH

McA)R +'TRRPs ~ ( bbJQ QT'p.~ fQ )NQ~gQQ,~)

>+B GF TM H~~ U~y pp~~~~ s~~<'T y+" p~T4 FK.LES,Q)Gu6

~«~TIos1

QF T W ~TO ~g ~U RAT-

INDIANAMICHIGAN POWE~R

SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEDWORKING COPY

OCT $ 5 tBS5


Qua . Ce Inspector

Date:Date:

Reviewed by: Date:Cons ruct on Anc or Review Engineer

t o-l>

page 1 of 3Revision .3

**12 CHP 5021.CCD ~ 019ATTACHKENT NO. 1

Un tI—'l-'90 4 9

B g.CQ N p

Eblis

~C S I 0 C,Mc

2. T(c- '3QInsta~ at on dwg. / Rev.

Anchora e Arran ament SketchEquipment No.

~/g wl L Q~RAe&- O~g,

0I

N 3/yx5" <Toms

b INDIANAhflOg, AN POLI cSITE OKSIGN C "ITROLL

WORKING OPY

OCT '[5 1995

8("KY' r < Q~

rb

LERK T

++ 4~ '5 A'~'amS OIIYl~I4N~ ts,

8Q'ECT.'AA

+ ~847 rn&AS'uk'a~~~ e,~so'F

%6$ 4~TIW- 8 '3 C7~ ~SWIICy)X 4~Re'>~T«

Date: I o -1-'l2

D te:Drawn by:Verified by:

Qua ./Ce . InspectorReviewed by: Date: I o-<3-'7>

Cons ruct on Anc r Rev ew Engineer

Page 1 o|.'Revision



FOR HORIZONTALTANKS AND HEAT EXCHANGERSRAI ITEM 7

This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspectiondocumentation for the horizontal tank and heat exchanger evaluations requested in RAI Question7. Included in this attachment are the evaluations for 1-HE-14, 2-HE-15E, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB, 2-QT-1 1$ -CD, 1-HE-.15E and 1-QT-107-CD.

01/16/92PG. N0.53'AFE

SHUTDOWN EQUIPMEHT I.IST (SSELWP)

FUNCTION: CC'W


Equipment ID: 1-NE-1C Drawing Number: 1-5135

System: CVCS

Equip Description: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER

Ruilding: AUXILIARY Room: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM Elevation: 633

Normal state: Desired state: Power Required: H Sort:

Suooorting System Drawing Number:

acquired Interconnections and Supporting Components:

fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN

ADDITIONAL INFORMATIOQ

Al ias Number: Power Train: NA

Comnonent Served: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHAHGFR

Manufacturer: AILAS INDUSTRAIAL MANUFACTURING CO Model: 1000 GPM

Panel:

Elem Drawing: H/A Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source: N/A

Walkdownt F Relay Only: N

Comoonent Type: HE (ONE PER UHIT)ISO Drawings:

Detailed Location:

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev. 0)Description: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEATEXCHANG,

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIALMANUFACTURINGCO, 1000 GPM


1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a targe, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greaterthan the demand.




-5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, fIat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

SRT: Gary Thomas, and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.

ANCHORAGE ADEQUACYACCEPTABLE TO SRT BASED ON BACKOF ENVELOPE CALCULATIONSHOWNBELOW.

Nozzle loads on heat exchanger are small (on the order of 600 lbs. and 600 ft.-lbs.).

Anchored with 2 - 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing. Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to theC.G. of exchanger is 13". Vertical d'stance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29".

Supports for saddle dowled into base concrete. Saddle supports are adequately reinforced to transfer loads tobolts.

SRT judged that the Heat Exchanger is rigid.

Back of the envelope calculation:

0.24g (DBE ZPA at floor) x 1.25 (for realistic spectra) x 3320 lbs. (wt. of HX) x 13" (to C.G.) / [2 (bolts) x (11.375")]+ 700 Ibs x 29" (Nozzle loads)/(2 x 11.375" ]+ 700 (ft. -Ibs) x12 in/ft/(2 x11.375") = 1830 lbs. tension/bolt-3320 (.76g )/4 (dead wt. - vertical earthquake) ) = 1199 lbs. tension/bolt

.24 x 1.25 x 3320/4 (bolts) + 700/4 = 424 lbs. shear/bolt

Embedment for the 7/8" diameter J-bolts is 19.5" or 19.5/.875 = 22.3 bolt diameters into concrete. RLp forembedment (90 degree hook) = ]19.5+8(7/8)]/(62.5 x.875)=0.49. Allowable for tension = 20.44 x 0.49 = 9.8 k >1.2 k. For shear = 10.22 k > 0.424 k. OK.

DC COOK Unit 1






Evaluated by: Date:

8/f5 (~>w

(p (p-


DC COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS}GIP Rev 2 Corrected 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 3 of 3





Overall Exchanger Saddle Support

Coo

ComponenC No. Class

Any parget:icular area the Seismic Roviev Teaa should pay oxtra attontion to?Yes < No (If yea, check items that apply.)

5

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor Embedment~Anchor Edge distanceAnchor

Cepv'nchorThread EngagementAnchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack

khamxha

lhd 4= kt('.~<fn r( 'I '< ~ ~ P~

lg" ~4/) J (T(p C04~AJ

Others (((sstribs brisrly) " ~ N IIk~~NO bl AS~5. )~ 5<,&~ f

(

IE there ia concern, for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicableitem and explain.

1.2.3.

Hardvare Maintenance Type DiscrepancyDra~ing Up&,te Type DiscrepancySignificant Operabili.ty/Design Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:

Actions Taken:lJDIJB (AG.H P PrO(AT(O(~

Prepared By T Data ('s >l P--

'HP 5021 CCD.019..i'TACHMENT NO 1

lt 5bPI-ZZlZ,- 332.5 - '9

ALlX I 33'-O" EL. LETDOWN BEAT EXCHANC ER RQQMBl g. Location

I - HE.- I4-

Insta at on wg. / Rev.


OI

4

CC'V

DUE, TQ HIC H RADIA'TIOM AREACSO v.~b HALT LOCKTIQMS WE.PE.NQT QBTALME.D QM THC KkG1PE.D'E5'TAL C)GI VlERE, DEXERMME.Q5(M(LAR TQ THE. WEST PE.QEGTAL.

Wr

II/ N 5'~z-'a I'iz," 5'e"

0>

5E.C T/QM "4-A"

PLA,M I


Reviewed by:

Date: 4!-Z>-'BDate:

ua ./Cert. Xnspector7 Date:



++12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO.

pgg No.: IZ-3)ZI-U. II IZ-3.)ZE ~

gag No.; IZ-50 t ) -ZO

Tightness verified? 0 Yes 0 No Date:ons ruc on

Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes I No Date:ons ruc o ARE

~

~ ~quipment No.: I-HE-I4.

Anchor type: ~ >~<~ ~~PE Z Dia:Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 TorqueTorque Wrench No.: Cal. Due Date:

Bolt ID I ~ 3 4

GaPs BFlwk5l BEfivEEIUI

Comments

Anchorlen th 2 '-

I '~z" Z'- I'li''- I ~i" 7'- I'jz"41'~z" ~ 41'l4" 4lg " 41 "L

Protruding ~sic ~ -~su --~6~.len th


Edg»distance,

)I'-7 lc I'-7~i~" I.'- /'rz" I'-7Yz->8'/4" >8" W Rli "dh a7Vr.

"~V~ ~'/2>/4 " 2'1(" L>~

C.SACK IhlCGMCRETT:

~1( UOTII SIDE5

4'/q 4 '/4

Anchors acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

I I ~/s" II~~a"

4 IO' lQ (50'LQCD I( OIC OK &IC

Comments 4 QtlE TD Hlf' RADIKfloLI AREA Iso Ar'I MLT Loc.ATI wERc hloT QKTAll.lTHC EAST P WERE DE:TER~I IMILAR, TO THE UV'C5i'T PE'0 'TAI Ih

A I hlSPEC T'L(5hl.15 I

R \hH R

R llICo

Varified by:Qua ./Cert. Inspector

Revieved by!T'ons ruct on

Date:

Date!

Page 2 of 3Revision l

siss've w i vvui verATTAVBKNTNO. l

l-HE,- l 4-

edded Steel Dwg. No.:Dug No.: re&

Weld ID

Size

Cracks

Lack ofPenetration

3(/v ( (/~ ~y &» (/4IP 3(/ gr I, (/

Yes YesNo QKOYes s YesNo

/~/4"(('//, /y "» '//,''lg"»'l4"

Yes

W~ WS Vl4 WS 'IMr- W V

l l

I/~ I/~ I/S

des

Yes

Wa,l

1 ~ Fillet~((~I/ » 2 ~ Plllg/slot

3 ~ Groove

Porosity Yes Yes Yes YesNo

Yes's Yes

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8- Noons ruc x

Reviewed by:ons ruc son c or evxev ngxneer

Uerified by: To <~+wc. s «~ oua . e . npsec or Date:


ssaC aVC J ~ 4 SU ~ V J VATTACHMENT NO. 1

~ipment No . 1- HE, - l4

added Steel Dwg. No.:Dwg No.: WR

Meld ID

Size

Cracksg >/g'~~lg "

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YQSNo No No No No No No

l ~ Filletes'

Plug/Slot3 ~ Groove

Lack of . ~ Yes Yes .YesPenetration KaJ No No NoYes Yes Yes YesNo No No No

Porosity Y Yes Yes Yes Yes'es Yes Yeso No No No No No No No

Equipment hase flexible: 0 Yas E Noon ruc z n a

Reviewed by:

Veri.fied by: 7c l eons ruc son c or avxew gxnaer

e . np ec r Date:

Page 3 of 3

Revision 1

S 8 A DEPARTMENTCONTROLLED DOCUMENTCOPY NO. 3- ~

12 SHP 5050 NDE pp8ATTACHMENT NO. 1


JOB ORDER NO.: ~l REPORT DATE: REgUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponentItemMaterialOther 5

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/N 5kFreq./DiameterReference StandardCouplant/Batch No. '7 SB

TEST DATA REMARKS

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


LEVEL ~ DATE

LEVEL:~'- DATE: Z 5


Equip ID: 2-HE-15E Train: 2 Equip Class:21

wing No.: 2-5135A 2-5113

tion: CCW

System: COMPONENT COOLING WATER

Equip Desc: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER

Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 HALLWAY


Normal State:4

Desired State: Power Req'd: N


Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER

MPR: M.L.W. INDUSTRIES

Pa el:Elem. Drawing: NOT APPL


Power Source: NOT APPL


Comp Type: HE

Iso Drawing: 2-CCW-41, 2-CCW-42

Location: 30 FEET EAST OP THE N2 MONITOR TANK



ID: 2-HE-15E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 609 HALLWAY-

30 FEET EAST OF THE ¹2MONITOR TANK

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: M.L.W. INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL)







N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

C LL 0

~CO I~SSRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang, and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93.

Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles. Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts.There are 4 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.

C.G. of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.

Pedestal concrete is cracked. AEPSC tracking the problem through a condition report. SRT has reviewed theresolution of this problem and determined that it is resolved.

This unit is the same as 1-HE-15E except there are no horizontal anchors on 1-HE-15E. The anchorage for thisexchanger is more robust. The calculations of 1-HE-15E show that the anchors are adequate and the saddles aresafe.

Evaluated by:

, sb.~ Date:

ttachment: Pictures



ID: 2-HE-15E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 609 HALLWAY-

30 FEET EAST OF THE ¹2MONITOR TANK

Manufacturer, Model, Etc:: M.L.W. INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL)

BLCLI le

ONE SADDLE WITH 4 HORIZONTALBOLTS OTHER SADDLE SUPPORT

Coo

Component No. '2- —I S E Cloaa

Any pazpicular area tho Seismic Review Teaa should pay extra attontion to?Yea < No (If yea, check Stoma that apply.)

Anchor TypoAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor lumbarAnchor Embodmont+Anchor Edge DistanceAnchor Gap MAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete

Cracks'thers

(describe briefly)

If there ia concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle tho applicableatom and explain.

1.2.3.

Hardvare Maintenanco Type DiscrepancyDra~ing Update Typo DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Design Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:HotJ8

Actions Taken:9 SING

Preparod By Dasa

**12 CHP 5021 CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

Equipment No.



2 6)x B..goy'-0" worry sourH ~w~qUnzt 0 Bldg. Locationi2.- B~Qg- 2s,iz-3zb- z-R6-l56


74'-'/a

~tt Ypg

l~0—

C,RPICe IIJ4ROVl .

I

J

C+ACK II I

6 CCouT

INDIANA MICHIGAN POVIERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

Y(OR KING COPY

AUG 24 1S95

LERK

/~g CRAuC T'O FLIIIIR

0'- l'/a +'/5 (gyp)

Drawn by: Date:Date: &~~ ~~

~~ ~

Verified by:Qual. /Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: 7 Date: 8 ~ t~Construction Anc or Review Engineer



2.Unxt

l 2.-3285-23 f2-'328


he~ M bO I'-O" NORTH ~GATV ~W~qBldg. Location



INOIANA MICHIGAN POvggRSITE DESIGN CONTROLI.EP

'tYORKING COPY

AUG 24 tSIIS

I.ERK

Y9P cR.Ac.z g~ XoIVV e6T.08.00T 4 CoLlC,

ROOT@ TOP

t BOGCf FB. WlPB)K'TEIDE 't'L

0IJ 0

ly+7z 'y 7-E <S~

<>xP)

El Ev. ~<ca UooicuQG

Drawn by: Date:

Dat:e:Verified by:gua ./Cert. Inspector

Reviewed by: T Date:Construct on An hor Review Engineer



2Unxt 0

l2.- N. SS-25, is-32eg-Installatz.on dwg. / Rev.



Bl..IOOq'-g~I hJQATA COOT/ HAU u~Bldg. Location

z- HB-t58Equipment No.

z- Bg - i'd%

Ql/g 9~ lOC4TlOA0$ ~(,N0R.

d

ItIDIANAMICMIGAW POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

WORKING COPY

AUG 24 1998

LERK T-

4

gv iEL.CV. U'I - UO k IQ OuY

C <~ c

0

Date:Date:

Drawn by:

gual./Cert:. InspectorReviewed by: Dat

Constru tron chor Review Engineer

Verified by:~~ ~~

e:



2Unzt 0

12.-8296- S t2.-3xg-Installation dwg. / Rev.



PrOX &1 - boq'-o" NORTH SbQTH RPn~+Bldg. Location

I /bklg (7Yp()7 6

O~

QOGIFI@) AT4X+

CRRcX

)'p j94C80 8,uJP 5AER

0V

INOIANA MICHIGAN PO)VERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

YYOR KING COPY

AUG 24 1895

LERK +

~ ~ pa

CId

CPP ~ Q f~ Volh)7gC,TWd&hl 4,RouT~ MQC.

EI Eu . J)EM tppkxÃI 0 IA


Date:

Date:Q a ./Cert. InsPector

Reviewed by: 7 Date:Construction An hor Review Engineer


**12 CHP 502 1. CCD. 0 19ATTACHMENT No.

Equipment No.: '- H C IGCAnchor type: Z BGU Dia:Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0Torque Wrench No.: rJATightness verified? 0 Yes 5 No HR

ons rucEquipment base flexible7 0 Yes S. No T'ns

Dwg No.: IR-3298"fDvg No.:

TorqueCal. Due Date:

c o ARE

Bolt ED

Gaps

t 2, 3 +o

Comments

Anchor +I p]~ +I g/~'i I3q''.~3(~"len thProtruding q3/~ )IS(I

>'enhQ ~ r I

Embedment Z~ ~~~ ZI ~I~/', 2'4'/<

37/

~tv QW4> a-3o13 8-Z<o~mCC~>/8'. 5'ee eEL v

Boltri ~ /8 E"/IIo 2'IX. < "/II .

To~mc6+>/gSbg LjoTE GEL4w.

Concrete CRAB CRACK. GRfKK GRhWconditionEdge &''" (oo

distance

CEGTcH

To~&+~/~'nchor

s acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

Tp L,~W<6I/q"

Comments. X /Ig'g~ &67~ QLITJtHASSSR, Yiq 4'GTW6&J Wm~oI PII R

0 'I4hCRIT ~ P 0 Serai To

OI 'T RIP ~HOT M u RR ~ C'T

verified by:Qua ./Cert. nspector

Revieved by:Construct on

SITE. DESIGN CONTROLLEDYIOIIKINGCOPY

'UG 2419SK

Date:

D te: 8-»

"I'ERKT

PaRe

e2of 3ision 1

**12 CHP 5021.CCD.P19ATTACHMENT No,

~

~ ~Equipment No.:Anchor type: < ~t. PrH(&OP.

Tightness established by: 0Torque Wrench No.: P

Tightness verified? I Yes

Equipment base flexible? 0

kg No.: '+ >>S8-Dia: I'wgNo.: ~> 8>"ZA

"Snug Fit" E Torque l?-- BoardI

Cal. Due Date:0 No S %a~~ Date: 4.<> 95

ons ruc ionYes 8 No ~~ Date: 0 +> 13

ons ruc on ARE

Bolt IDGaps

Comments

Anchorlen

Protrudinglen h

7~/y'ual CtII

Embedment 5l(q."

BoltriC n ete C,~< MPCQ CRPcv CppcE.condition

Edgedistance

Anchors acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

/I (p $~/l(p 4 4 "

(3/$V )3tqlI gyl /II5" I g'3/8" 5', C ~(<I,"

0 0 0Og. ot'K,

Vo TOP OFC SHIIT

Ta ToPoF AN<

Comments:

Y~ gh ac.ssC'erifiedby:

Qua ./ ert. Inspectorevieved by:

Const ct on ARE

A~MJ I


WORKING COPY

AUG 24 19S5

ReLERK

Date:

Date:

o2of 3ision 1



OR S CT 0

CAL

Dwg No.: I 2-8>98-

Weld XD

T eSizeLen hCracks

~li Io ~hb

Yes Yes YesNo

QL gZ W3

g] ~

Yes YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

YesNo

We e Codes1 = Fillet2 = Plug/Slot3 = Groove

Lack of . LesPenetration QRYes Yes

Noes Yes

NoYesNo

YesNo

YesNo

Porosity Yes Yes YesNo

YesNo

Yes YesNo . No

YesNo

&GQ hi<

'R. ~/~3RYgxqx. q"

IA

'4.4

~ J)44

+4 ~

4 o

.0,~ 4.

INDIANA MICHIGAN PO'LYERSITE DESIGN CONTRCI.LEO

IVORKING COPY

AUG 24 1895

~ ~qyeHh RCCBpT 7~ ~O~"

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes g No 1 Date: <-2'~ons ruc z n e

Reviewed by:

ified by:ons ruc ron c or evxew ngxneer

ua . e . npsec or

: ~S. -3Date:


S 8 A DEPARTMENTCONTROLlED DOCUMENTCOPY NO. ~/


UfTRASONIC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO«: :~/.». ~ * . /A

IDENTIFICATION

Unit WaaComponentItem A~a.MaterialOther 5

Test Unit/ S/NflVSR- CNC-9'KFreq./Diameter .asDReference Standard &C'-8Couplant/Batch No. ~ ~/~ lP88

TEST DATA REMARKS

P. EPV C.

EE

EI

„

J ~

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


LEVEL:~~ DATE: IY'-/3~z3

LEVEL:~ DATE:


~Yi atabase: K:SSEL1B.DBF

Equip ID: 12-HE-16N Train: 12 Equip Class:21~

~

~ing No.: 12-5136, 1-5135

Function: SFP COOLING AND CCW

System: SPENT FUEL PIT COOLING & CCW

Equip Desc: NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER

Building: U-1 AUXILIARY Room: SPENT FUEL PIT HE ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:

Safety Related Status: STANDARD


~ Comp Served: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP

MFR:

5:Panel:

Elem. Drawing:

Wiring Drawing:

Power Source:


Comp Type: HE

Min/Opt: MIN

Iso Drawing: 12-SF-5, 7, 1-CCW-l, 7

Location: NW AREA OF RM

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT

HEATXCHGR RM, NWAREAOFRM

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP.

BASIS: Horizontal TANKanalysis






N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

C

~CM@NN Q

RT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.

3' 2" diameter horizontal heat exchanger about 22'ong on two saddles supported by piers. Total weight full givenas 26,200 lbs.

Exchanger bolted into pier with 4 7/8" diameter bolts per saddle. Piers are dowled into floor.

The results of tank analysis show that the tank anchorage is adequate and also the saddles are safe.

Evaluated by: Date:

Attachment: PicturesAttachment: TANKAnalysis ResultsAttachment: Check of Stresses in Saddles

DC COOK Unit 1



HEAT XCHGR RIVI, NW AREA OFRM


NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER

DG COCK Unit 1



HEAT XCHGR RM, NWAREA OFRM


TANKAnalysis Results

Step 1 —Input Dataa) Assumptions1. Tank is cylindrical, horizontally oriented and supported on saddles.2. Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel3. Saddles are uniformly spaced.4. Saddles overhang is less than spacing /25. Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under

the fixed saddle.6. Imposed nozzle loads are not significant.7. The tank foundation is adequate.8. Anchor bolts are cast in place or expansion type.

YesYesYesYesYes

YesYesYes

b) MaterialsWeight of Tank+ FluidWeight Density of Tank+ FluidSaddle Elastic ModulusSaddle Shear ModulusBase Plate Yield StrengthAnchor Type

c) DimensionsTank Diameter, DTank Length, LTank Thickness, tHeight of Tank+ Fluid C.G., HcgNumber of SaddlesSaddle Spacing, SSaddle Height, hSaddle Shear cross-sectional areaSaddle Weak Axis Moment of InteriaNumber of Bolt Locations / SaddleNumber of Bolts / Bolting LocationExtreme Bolt Spacing,

D'nchorBolt Eccentricity, eWeld ThicknessBase Plate Thickness

26.2 kips151 Ibs/ftn330000.0 ksi1". 500.0 ksi30000.0 ksi

7/8 in 90 deg. J-Bolts

3.17 ft22.0 ft0.44 in2.16 ft

13.0 ft4.9 in

23 63 inn224.36 in"4

1.83 ft3.0 in

0.188 in0.5 in

DC COOK Unit 1





d) Anchor Bolts

Type = 90 Deg J-BoltManufacturer =

Diameter = 7/8 inProduct Name =

Nominal CapacityPullout

20.44 kipsShear

10.22 kips

Concrete Compression Strength, fc' 3500.0 psi

Reduction ParametersCapacity Reduction Factor

Label Check Condition Pullout Shear1. Type of Anchorage2. Installation Adequacy

YesYes Installation is adequate

1.01.0

1.01.0

3. Embedment Length Yes Embedment Length = 18.75in

0.47 1.0

4. Gap at Threaded Anchors5. Spacing between Anchorages

Yes Gap size = 0.0 inYes

1.01.0

1.01.0

7. Concrete Strength and Condition8. Concrete Crack Location and Size9. Essential Relays in Cabinets10. Base Stiffness and Prying Action11. Equipment Base Strength and

Structural Load Path12. Embedment Steel and Pads

Yes Base strength and load pathare O.K.

Yes Installation is O.K.

YesYes Crack Size = 0.0 inNo

Yes

1.01.0

'1.0

1.0

1.0

1.01.0

1.01.0

1.0

Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters?

Step 2- The allowable bolt loads

Allowable Tension Load,Pu'llowableShear Load,Vu'.211 kips

7.967 kips

Step 3 —Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor

RB 346.7068

DC COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: Yes

'heet5 of 9ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGERBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT

HEATXCHGR RM, NWAREAOFRM


Step 4 —Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor

RW 3.3848

Step 5 —Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads

Allowable Anchorage Tension Load, PuAllowable Anchorage Shear Load, Vu

7.211 kips7.967 kips

Step 6 —Calculate the ratios and values

alpha (Pu/Vu)

Vu /WbHcg /

D'cg/SF1

F2

0.913.28 kips/bolt

2.431.18

0.1662.2362.475

Step 7- Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage

lambda 1

lambda uAnchor Acceleration capacity, lambda

1.088 G0.772 G0.772 G

Step 8 —Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response

Maximum Saddle Spacing, Sc 13.45 ft

Step 9 —Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction

Saddle Stiffness, KsR nant Frequency of Tank in Longitudinal Direction

13948.206 kipsfin72.15 Hz

DC COOK Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 6 of9




Step 10 —Determine the seismic demand acceleration

ZPA 0.275 G

Tank is rigid in all three directions.Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA

Step 11 —Check the saddle stresses

The program does not check the saddle stressesCheck the saddle stresses by an independent calculation

CUENT

Cr~ H~hmou


A Struoiurnl Mnohnaionlconrulbag Engiauutiny Firm

''/gag: .4~ J,l~ s4 ke:ss e.s .i

P

II

III I

1 I

i3«) VI S

/r24'z '""

'j8'* '

irin<yjt.p /g.u.IIII .«.g '(., J = ...3 .I PSI

-'A--n.o-L Aro-'n".CIopn.oI ig g'= r Ir0 J.

--Z'.pa--—— .'pg j.E

(I:rru CI'FiOar)

I " ~ ~ I ~ -« ~

I 'I

~ Qf'W r«II

I l II

I

'I 1

u 2.l~ I gg L Lire,

r

—ZBIrls..u ru.S

j

I

~ II'

I i I~ I

~ ~ i

i I I

~4I i2!

j i j

I I

I

i l,I I

CUENT

SUBJECT

W)JOB No. SHEET OF


5 A Srrucrurnl McchnnrcnlConrulnnrr Enprnncnnrr fum

Z085

o

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

o ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ II

e e ~ 0 II

I I II

~ ~ '

~ ~

~ ~

I'

eo r vms ~ we'll ~ Q J,gATTACHMENT HO. l

~g No.: IL 5L97A-I4Dwg No.: IL M135 2

Equipaent No.: 'li- HE-(4 0Anchor types'

'. VDCY Dia: ie"+

Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 TorqueTorque Wrench No.: Cal. Due Date:Tightness verified? 0 Yes EI No Date: ((-(o- 2

ons c nEquipment hase flexible? 0 Yes K No Date: -(0- l2

ons ruc on ARE

Bolt XD

CapsComments

Anchor ', „„, ~m ox~len I

'- l l" l'-ll" I'-II" I'-ll" I'- l l" I'- l I"

I'-

I I" I'-(I" 1%" 30'73-g

Pro~ding ~i',- ~" ~p "8," 4iia 'i

len

Edgedistance

gIz" C 'i'."

„0 ~2,' 2,'+"

Concretecondition 0(( Ql< QK QK OK OK OK

4

. Anchor' acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

Q 7 IEI," 3 1/i >~tg" > 'iZ" 4 4 4

0 0 Zo po 4 4 4 4OlC. OIC. QK Ok; .. Ol( 'l( Qk GK

Comments: 4 5QRr'Yean.m.

IM T PER RA&I I Z, ~

CKo~W A~a,

Verified by:Qua . Cert. nspect r

Reviewed byeConstruct on INDIA IA MICHIGAN POVIER

SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEDVlORKING COPY

. Date:

5-2.z-)z

AUG 2 4.1995

LEAK

Page 2 of 3Revision l

ATTAU96ÃZ NO. 1

Equipment No.: )Z.-HC -IGM

Embedded Steel. Dry. No.:Dug No.:

I l I I I t I

>li ~/ic.1 ~ Fillet2 ~ Plug/slot3 ~ Groove

/~r ~i<. ~i( If~" IS ~i iSize5~~ic" 44.'i'z" Z.>a" 5 '~s" 2." Z ~a" L~~s"

.E.'~4"Lan

Cracks Yea Yea Y s Yea Yes YeaNo No No No No

Yea YeaNo No

Yea YesNo No

Yea YeaNo No

'AE.LDQ 'INS. Vl4, WS. 4 NIoRE.QDE.'5 T

Lack of Yea Yes Yes . YPenetration No No N

Yea YeaNo No

Porosity Yea Yes s es Yea'esNo No o No. No No

CXlALLTY CQMTRQL TEC W MlC.IAU QLll Y VERIFIE,DPER COGGTRUCTLOM, AbKHQR REVlEVl E.MCLMEER,'5

W+ HA'5 5LAC AND its" POPlTLOM

15 UklKR CUT.

geld y 'Ihfi Wz. Wa W< VVs Wr W~ W s

Wi

Wz

Wa

WII

BIOLJ ~? ~6~O >.Cg~NO<i-oQO~OQOX-~@X

co oZO?O i-'l

L UFV. LK . V/E.GY PAC E l QFK

Equipment base flexihles 0 Yea 8 Noons

Revieyed byn e

Date:

Dateons ruc on c or ev ev g eer

Verified by:ua ~ ~ npsec or Date:


ATTAauKNT No. l

Equipment No.: IZ HC IGM

Embedded Steel Dry. No.:%g No.:

Weld ID

SizeLan

Ws VYIo W ii 'llizI 1

~l(c. ~/I( Wi(

5 A Z ~s 4.4'i~ 5'4

Cracks

Lack ofPenetration oPorosity Y

s Yeso No

Yes Yes YesNo No No

Yes .Yes Yes Yeso No No No No

Y Yes Yes Yes'eso No No No No

l ~ Fillet2 ~ Plug/Slot3 ~ Grooves Yes

N No

Yes YesNo oYes YNo No

We '~s" PQRTIOkl CF VlE.EO )6 UQQE.RC O'T.

INDIANAMICHIGAN PO(VERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

'IVORKING COPY

AUG 24 1995

"LERK TPACE Z.OF5

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes H. No T'on e

Date:

Reviewed by:

Verified by:ons ru o

a . e . npsec or

c r evlev g eer

Pago 3 of 3Revision 3.

ATTACEBKNT No.

Equipment No.: 'lh HC )AUEmbedded Steel Dwg. No.:

Dwg No.:

Weld ID

size

V/)s W i~ W is W ic W..)~ W)eI

~/)C +Iso

I I I I

)/s, ~ha- Pi~ )IS

44'Iz" Z.'ls" Z'~z" L"e," Z."e" Z.'Iz" Z.'~e"

WmW

1 ~ Fillet~~Is.

2 ~ Plug/Slot3 ~ GrooveCracks


Yea YesNo No

Yea YesNo No

Yea YesNo No

Yes Yes Yes YeaNo No No No

Yea ,Yes Yea YeaNo No No No

Yes Yea Yes'esNo No No No

YeaNo

YeaNo

YesNo

YesNo

YeaNo

YesNo

WELD'QM 'THI5 PAC E. WC.KE. MOT 'tE.RAFIEO aV a .C.. T~~<~D~-

W)+


WORKING COPY

~UG 24 tSSS

W)sW) LERK T

Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes EL Noona 0 e

Date:

Reviewed by:

Verified by:ona ruc

ua . o . npsec or

on c o evxew gxneerDate: ~-~-~~

Date:


S Px A DEPARTMENTCONTROLLED DOCUMENT

COPY NO.


UITRASONIC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO.: ~ A REPORT DATE: 9 REQUEST NO. hl

IDENTIFICATION

Unit aComponentItemMaterialOther

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/NFreq./Diameter RaReference StandardCouplant/Batch No. 'g L S

TEST DATA REMARKS

r 4

Y T A LE SA'F'T'

t A.

F wio

PERFORMED BY: W

REVIEWED BY:


DATE:


IEVER:I

I EVE?: ~ DATE:

Equip ID: 1-QT-107-AB Train: 1 Equip Class:21

Drawing No.: 1-5151A~

~

~

~

~ ~

tion: EMERQ DIESEL

System: DIESEL FUEL OIL

Equip Desc: AB EMERG DXESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK

Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: AB FUEL OXL DAY TANK

MFR:

el: 36" D x 108" L, 465 GAL.

el:Elem. Drawing: N/A

Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source: N/A


Min/Opt: MIN

Comp Type: TANK (CAPACITY- 2HRS FULL LOADOPERATION)

Iso Drawing:

Location: XN THE SW REGION OF THE ROOM INSIDE THE AB EMERGENCYDIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK ENCLOSURE,, AT 599 EL.

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-QT-107-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L,465 GAL.






5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

COh0iggNT!j

SRT: George G. Thomas (SM) and Tom Huang (AEP), 10/7/93.

~

~

Same as 1-QT-107-CD, except that the grout is in much better condition for 1-QT-107-AB.

Evaluated by:


ed=/

I

Date:

/I 9 ~85el

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-QT-107-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model ~ Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.

~PC~FQ

AB Emerg. Diesel Fuel Oil Day Tank 1-QT-1 07-AB

++12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD ~ 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

AUXUn

iQ- 369Q -2- i-QT- ia7- A5Equipment No.Insta at. on dwg. / Rev.


50UTH%E57 5'le QF'@ o,g pM UP w~iCr) -O AG EMCPGt:M(Y QKSEL T11Q Oll OlE't XLktl( b'i

Bldg. Location

gl Qil

4e p4II

FfP.)

+I Qll

E l E.V. LM. 5QUTH

5y'E.CY1

QD 'A- A"

D,rawn by: Q. ROTC,

Verified by:Qua ./Cart.

Reviewed by:Construct on

Inspector

Date:Date:

Date:Anc r Review Engineer

f

2.- 'LS-g g


~ ~ l

- ~ ~ ~ ~

~ i

S ~ ~

0 - ~

s '%~4

l kt.S

&5%~~%aaaISWISRRRHLLmmeeasmmmmRRE555RRRLLWWWRHaLaii) aa) kalggggggggggg~~~~

gggg@gg++QQ%555%WLLLL~ 4 k k 4MWWMWWWW

Pg

S (% A DEPAiRTMFNTCONTROLLED DOCUMENTCOPY NO.

SHP 5050 NDE.QQ8ATTACHMENT NO. 1


JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: gr 1 REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponentItemMaterialOther

TECHNI UE

Test Unit/ S/NFrey./Diameter ~ ABC)Reference StandardCouplant/Batch No.L&p

TEST DATA REMARKS

W6/7~"

7c'

PERFORMED BY: LEVEL:~& DATE: /REVIEMED BY: LEVEL: DATE:

FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1. Page 1 of 1Revision 0

Page No. 77010/19/94

SYSTEMDESCRIPTDRAWINGNOBUILDXNGNORMSTATEDESXRSTATEPOWERREQDALIASNOPOWERTRAXNCOMPSERVEDMANUFACTURMODELPANELELEMDWGWIRXNGDWGPWRSOURCEQUALXFWALKDOWNPFDOPTSUPPSYSDWGREQSUPPEVAL TYPENOTESFUNCTXON.E'VATION

KTXON. YP TYPE

ISO DWGSDETAIL LOCFLOORFLOW PATHREVREV LOCKLOCK DATESHOW INDEXTAGS IGNATURESREV NOTES

221

2-QT-115-CDDIESEL LUBE OILCD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OXL SUMP TANK2-5151CAUXILIARY

NACD LUBE OIL SUMP TANK

775GALS

NOT APPLNOT APPLNOT APPLNUCLEAR SRFMIN

Seismic Only

EDG579.00

CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PITNTANK

XN THE WEST PART OF THE PXT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE

S0

N/ /

YN

Donald C. Cook Niiclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92

SCREENING EyALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: YesSheet1 of7

ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescn tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY

Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS


Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSLLUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WESTPART OF THE PIT, NEAR THEWEST WALL,3 FEET ABOVE THEFLOOR

1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greaterthan the demand.


3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to orreater than the demand.


5. A rin -t e foundation is not used to su ort a la e, flat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

IS E UIPMENT SEISMICALLYADE UATE? Yes

COMMENTS

SRT: W. Djordjevic and TR Satyan Sharma. 10/6/93.

REF: 1. Anchor inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics DataSheet, Certi".:ed 10/1/93.2. Worthington Dwg ¹ 700003BY.3. Worthington Co.Lube Oil Sump Tank Calculation, 8/22/74.

Anchorage:The tank sits on 3 saddles, 2 plates per saddle, 1/4" thick. There are two 3/4" anchors per saddle. There are 4anchors in total for the tank because the middle saddle has no anchorage on it.

Horizontal Tank Analysis:Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Inertia = 2I + 2(ad "2) = 2((36"x0.25in"3)/1 2) + 2(1 8in"2 x (5"2)in"2") = 900in "4.

Saddle stresses analyzed in Ref. 3.

Nozzle loads judged not significant by SRT.

Evaluated by: Date:

U

go

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Uni~ 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY


Attachment: PicturesAttachment: TANKAnalysis Results


Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)

Sheet 3 of 7ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY


PICTURES


2-QT-115-CD

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL

LUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WESTPART OF THE PIT, NEAR THEWEST WALL,3 FEET ABOVE THEFLOOR


TANKAnalysis Results

Step 1 —Input Data

a Assum tions1. Tank is c lindrical, horizontall oriented and su orted on saddles.2. Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel3. Saddles are uniforml s aced.4. Saddles overhan is less than s acin /25. Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate

under the fixed saddle.6. Im osed nozzle loads are not si nificant7. The tank foundation is ade uate

YesYesYesYesYes

YesYes

8. Anchorbolts are cast in lace or ex ansion t e.

b MaterialsWei ht of Tank+ FluidWei ht Densit of Tank+ FluidSaddle Elastic ModulusSaddle Shear ModulusBase Plate Yield Stren thAnchor T e

6.83 ki s60 Ibs/ft*3

29000.0 ksi1150.0 ksi36.0 ksi

3/4 in 90 de . J-Bolts

Yes

c DimensionsTank Diameter, DTankLen th, LTank Thickness, tHei ht of Tank+ Fluid C.G., HNumber of SaddlesSaddle S acin, SSaddle Hei ht, hSaddle Shear cross-sectional areaSaddle Weak Axis Moment of InteriaNumber of Bolt Locations / SaddleNumber of Bolts / Boltin LocationExtreme Bolt S acin,

D'nchorBolt Eccentricit, eWeld ThicknessBase Plate Thickness

3.8 ft10.0 ft0.19 in2.08 ft

7.67 ft2.0 in

18.0 in"2900.0 in"4

2.67 ft0.02 in0.19 in0.25 in

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP Ti NKBuilding: AUXILIARY


d Anchor Bolts

Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSLLUBE OIL Pl, - IN THE WESTPART OF THE PIT, NEAR THEWEST WALL,3 FEET ABOVE THEFLOOR

T e = 90 De J-BoltManufacturer =

Diameter= 3/4 inProduct Name =

Nominal Ca acitPullout

15.03ki sShear

7.51 ki s

Concrete Com ression Stren th, fc'= 4000.0 si

Reduction ParametersCa acit Reduction Factor

Label1. T e of Anchora e

CheckYes

Condition Pullout1.0

Shear1.0

2. Installation Ade uac3. Embedment Length

4. Ga at Threaded Anchors5. S acin betweenAnchora es

Yes Embedment Length = 27.0in

Yes Ga size = 0.0 inYes

Yes installation is ade uate 1.00.7

1.01.0

1.01.0

1.01.0

6. Edge Distance Yes Edge Distance = 6.0 inAnother Edge Distance = 4

in

0.41 0.31

7. Concrete Stren th and Condition8. Concrete Crack Location and Size

YesYes Crack Size = 0.0 in

1.01.0

1.01.0

9. Essential Relays in Cabinets Yes Essential relays are notresent

1.0 1.0

10. Base Stiffness and P in Action11. Equipment Base Strength and

Structural Load Path12. Embedment Steel and Pads

YesYes

Yes Installation is O.K.

Base strength and load pathare O.K.

1.01.0

1.0

1.01.0

Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters? Yes

Step 2 —The allowable bolt loads

Allowable Tension Load,Pu'llowableShear Load,Vu'.344 ki s

2.346 ki s


0.1726

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Un«2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescri lion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY


Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL'UBEOIL PIT - IN THE WEST

PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THEWEST WALL,3 FEET ABOVE THEFLOOR

Step 4- Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor

RW 0.0379


Allowable Anchora e Tension Load, PuAllowable Anchora e Shear Load, Vu

0."i64ki s2.346 ki s


al ha Pu/VuWbVu/WbH /0'

/S

F2

0.071.71 ki s/bolt

1.370.7790.2712.2361.779

Step 7 —Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage

lambda 1

lambda uAnchor Acceleration ca acit, lambda

0.614 G0.568 G0.568 G

Step 8- Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response

Maximum Saddle S acin, Sc 14.2 ft


Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)


ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ersDescri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANKBuilding: AUXILIARY

Manufacturer Model, Etc.: 775GALS


Saddle Stiffness, KsResonant Fre uenc of Tank in Lon itudinal Direction

10339.067 ki s/in121.66 Hz


ZPA 0.25 G




~Summa

IS E UIPMENT SEISMICALLYADE UATE'?

The tank anchorage is adequate.

*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Unztl 2.- 5'2

~<' ~ 6. CDBldg.

Iz

I

Location2. -QT-) I

- CCInstallation dwg. / Rev.


I/O".

Qp, UYe)

bb'b

P,~/X,ID a5-2" 7 DIMLZ.324112-

8 G RouT PC%

4, O'4 na

I'-Z"(~p

0/4Q 3 604$ ('7$P)I/j. R AbSHCR

INOIANA MICHIGANPOWE'ITE

OKSIGN GONTPQLI.Q)OWOIIKINQ CQPY 0

AUG 271995

LKRK T

D.te.Date:


ua ./Cert. InspectorReviewed by: Date: 8 -+~ +~

Constructs.on An hor Review Engineer


*~L2 CHP 0023.. CCD. ()] gATTACHMENT NO l

ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHE

&x,g c.D PITLocate.on

2.- a.y -( t g - C D

Unit g

l~- 9 I

ldg.

Equipment No.Installation dwg. / Rev.


06

CQ

p

CL

I

-- -0

(o" INOIANA MICHIGAN POWERSITE OESIGN CONTROLLEO

WORKING COPY

AUG 2't 3995

LERK +


Date:

Date:

Q-t 0-gg

ual.fCert. InspectorReviewed by: 7'ate:

Construction A char Review Engineer-27-'t ~

Page 1 of 3

Revision 1

**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 0 lgATTACHMENT N(3.

Dwg No.: I 2-3Z~t-1

Dwg No.: l 2-3qpZg


Equipment No.: + @T I< 5 | D~

~

~

~Anchor type: BOL ~BlTightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 TorqueTorque Vrrench No.: QA Cal, Due Date:Tightness verified? Cl Yes Cl No NPI 7 ': ll—""*

ons ru t,z.on

Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8 No Date: ~ ~D I~onstruc x n ARE

Bolt IDGaps

Comments

Anchorlen th

Protrudinglen th

Embedment

il2-8 '2- 8I I'

l2-3/Ib

l2- Bolas

5 ~~ ~HOT


Edgedistance

Anchors acinAnchor

an laritThread

engagement

fIb~iY<

9~ht"@I|<il

0

C,RhC I( IN

QA.OVTCR~Itl QROV T

2.- oI

7((g+l'I~ SC~

<v(c.',AHhl0<

M~SR~ GP-OUT T~~~~< ~

JS Il P JOT'P DOING (SoKaTH H~C C)Sl C?1 &AC 9 ADDING I / TM ~IL FR.OM, OP OF C ROOT. % ACC.~ 55IGL6 gl 4D

I "Y&nl 5 >3" >I P 0 AC WP(5l R.CSPGC.TIV Y.

Verified by:~ ~Qual. /Cert.

Reviewed by: TConstruction

nspectorINOIANA kt ICHIGAN POWERSITE DESIGN CONTROLLED

AUG 27 tS8~

Date:

Date: 8'1 I ~

LERK + Page 2 of 3Revis ion 3

'8 A DEPARTMENT

CONTROLLEO DOCUMENTCOPY NO. 2 I

' SHP 5050 NDE. 008ATTACFNEVZ NO .

LTRASONIC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO.: i 6 REPORT DATE-' ~ Q REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

Unit l ~<3Component - 7- l - t 4ItemMaterial C. S,Other

Test Unit/ S/NFreer./Diameter hReference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

TEST DATA REMARKS

1&(l~ L w l

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


EZVEI ~ DATE: ~ /7Page 1 ofRevision 0

01/16/92PG. N0.535

SAFE SHUTDOWN EOUIPHENI'IST (SSELWP)

FUNCTION: CCM


Cauiamcnt IO: 1.HE.15E Orawing Nurbert \-5135A 1-5113

Svstcm: CCM

Cauip Oescription: CAST CCM HEAT EXCHAHGER

Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 HALLMAY Elevation: 609

wnrmaI state- Oesired state: Po~er Required: M„ Sort: M,

Sunnorting System Drawing Number:

oeauired Interconnections and Supporting Components:

fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Nin/Opt 4 HIN


Al ias Number: Power Train: NA

C~nent Served: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER

Hanufacturcr: NL'M INOUSTRIES Model t

Pahei 4

Elem Orawing: M/A Miring Orawing: N/A

Po~er Source: N/A

uaILdown: F Relay Only: N

Comoonent Type: HE

ISO Orawings:

Octallcd Location:

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HE-15E (Rev. 0)Description: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER


Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MLWINDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL)







N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

IS E UP EN SEIS C L 0 U E? ~Ye

C~I~IVIEN S

SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang, and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93'.

Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles. Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts.There are 4 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.

C.G. of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.

Pedestal concrete in good condition, but can see the grout to concrete interface.Hand calculation was performed for the heat exchanger and the results show that the anchor bolts are adequateand the saddles are safe.

Evaluated by: Date:

LAttachment: PicturesAttachment: ANCHORAGE ANALYSISFOR THE TANK

DC COOK Unit 1


ID: 1-HE-15E (Rev. 0)Description: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER


Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MLWINDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL)

CTU ES

kgb

I

ONE SADDLE WITH 4 HORIZONTALBOLTS OTHER SADDLE SUPPORT

CUENT

SUBJECT

SHEEf OF


II h Svurtvsal Macha nialConaulnnp Cnpmawlnp f neo

08lUK

Itgfl(

~~o

I2o- 0

3

(gy) x58

g 6~a&

<<Ig P(3g'0

P'I ..7ke t./a.

CUENT

SUOJECT

JOO No. SHEET Ft OF

~ Ah~rto>


5l A Sicuniucni llsolsnnionlConculnnSI EnqsnsucsnFI Fsc su

i-H —tea

II

i . i S. E.gojs, 'TbM. X<'fnlg] .. o. (.QM ..~6OI'; kx) it:.:I

I ' I

c

~, . „~s I ~ '

* ~, s s Ci,I

I ~ '

~

Ip ..-Q„n I

is

IF

~ ~

~.l cn51cuC40'f

>el t„y . Z-s~r

w.o~ ~p.b'.=, A>(.oo gg

s

T.WS ..SS.:=.~ . = ISI TS/'S I, . 1.3.'gi

~ ~ s ~ ~

~.g>~~A.. |'i«/g.n~g~~ ~ ~ l'~2.

M xS~ y3z zgh) .„„,

z 5'.~(+ i.l~s)

ly I~ Vn'. Ess'J

4.)oscs O.Ic}-.

~ I

iI"7."2.>;"F"",Z, S/< 356 'I;~ I~:

s

I ~

K7$ (f7qOD'), gQ ~ .87ESC +'7. O .O) cital 2~$ ,27S) +qboIS

~

~

I

V ~ J... 3~ ~ FE~ 4 n 2 '6 sun

* I '

4. ~ « I ~ ~

i I ',.'c,lJl 2CIC?.l, '., = '8 8 VS — ii,7 c D .'.,6): WSITSI II.I, . ~ ']9, 8 O'CW

I~ F I

s

I ~ I

I s

s

i II ~

~ I II I

J) I

-s ~

~ 'I

I * ~

CLIENT SHEET OF

~ f~ > " 'KO cr pg


S A Srrncrvrnl hlcchcnrcclConsnlrlnp Enprnccrrnp Flrrn

A,QIOg~io(r.'TET'yY' $ K$ .tv'4 40(.$ $

l0( gxd

~ E.-.4CQ <4C >~4J(LE:k. "'-

o5

' ( «j3xAo f ~,q p

~ ...'.,o-ro ~.yy-y.+ t- lg

. lg =.+.oc ...:.3'.+6 .=.Io8

3 2-~ 5 X 37 3' E. g g ( l 5) — 'ZT

I P TS

CLIENT sHEET ~ o


0 A Srrucrurel hlechenreelCnnsulrrng Engrneenng Frrnr

Io,g75g

VP //ader'< = = 2Zjyoo glOE.i 7y344

2

Jr

zI ~ 2 75 )t', gg y~ g . ( g 1I ) — Z 3 Z. 6 5.J

f. nl ~~H~ ~ Hg

Z7 SoS .+/ Z~~ E 6)" 'tSZ.lS 7.S)j'

o8 .SIPED

.I (C «)'~ (ISS)'f, Se

7 77- ( rlr I "g)I'-S r'e o.y

3 Z..$7 7Z

Ts '27SX 2f go c ~ 1 Z~z

III ~ 3 Z(

V'~ S.fT.. -.



Unzt g Bldg.@AU MA

Location1- H~ -isG



I- RE- 'I5F

PcQRGWA,c PZDE5t&a

li"ICO

40

0

Ihtlh MiCHIGAN POWERSTRUC IO."I COI': ROLLEO

~'r'ORKIAG COPY

f'UG1 ( ]quip

T>~ a"jg

" Z-'vcr(vxP)

a~ 4

cl

0'rawn

by:Verified by:

Reviewed by:

Date: /D- 7-

Date:Q~ l-/Cert. Xnspector

Date: X/7 z.structxon Anchor Review Engineer


"*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Un1t 0 Bldg.F- >

Location



I <I

3 II

il~ )5-a /i~

- I'/g 'xINDIA%'iI8!CtOGAI'I POlVEIOiISTBlICTIO".ICO.'ITROLL

'ViOlIKii'IGCOPY

P,UG l 7 19gr

CL RK

Drawn by:Uerified by:

Reviewed by:Qu ./Cert. Inspector

Date:onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer


+*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Unxt 0 Bldg.-I L"

Location



0-'9ll

O-S1i

o 4'Nr:4'<Il,!CHIGA!<

P0'ON'rr;;C.!!r~ .0!nnP"i'0".K.'."<G CGPY

C A4

r~ ~II

LCicv. Ui- VoGK lQ 00 Y'

rawn by:Verified by: Date:

Q l./Cert. InspectorReviewed by: Date:

onstructzon Anchor Review Engineer

4>- )2


'+12 CHP 5021.CCD.019ATTACHMENT NO. 1


Unxt 4

ZlBldg.

Installatz.on dwg. / Rev.


— E- eEEquipment No.

Location

-HE-i

~F

or'r + O

r

Ei . Uicu

goal

4oLH Imhusg

V~e)

0

0 ~ y

ll'(~'lb''i/. V.i(::-'IGA'iPO'QCQNGTR~.'"."IG:< C.l":.i:RG .LED

AUG j. 7 8,"'>

0oCL'n~(

Q- Pt<0-9

ELEv. 48.& UookiAe 0 H

O~0

V +< D


Reviewed by:

Date: to-7- l

Date: P -~/u >

Q al./Cert. InspectorDate:

onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer


~ ~

~ e ~ t

~ ~ ti''~ )a

) ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ - )

~ '1~4

gQ+Q~gig~~~~kRWWWKHELmmmmmHHLLRSRSmmRRSLIR555m55LLLSRSWRIRHRRLSRSW ~ HLLLLK%%5 .. RRWWWWMWWREWW&W%%55WRIHRRSRRRSRRLLR%8%8%RRMMW&MWWWWMWW

sl ~ !~ „ I~ C Iu

»Bl kl» ~

~ a

al z&its

~ ~

) ~ r

iaL a ~ s.

~ ~ t ' ~ ~ s ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

Ir ~ r

~-

>LkL ' err

- ~ 0 ~ e ~ ~ ..t ia..'. ~r'( ~ ~ 1 4

~ r~ ~

t~ ~ ~

0

555%5%%%%LLRSR55%mHHLS55Ã%8NNLLLLWISNRRRKLLRWWSWLLLLRIRSSRRLELERRRWRWWRSWRWELLLRSWWQLEELR%R%RSRWMMWWMW&WWW&&~ ~ a. 0 ~ l 1 A 1 a a

~ ~gh A.. s OJ r ~ IL5 ~ ~ saaJ

I/5Ji4 4A L I~ ~ f

~ i

Equipment No.:

Tightness established by "Snug Pit"7Tightness verified by: -c

Qual. /Cert. Inspector

Comments:

/w uEPARTPAENICONTROLLED OOCUMEHT

coPYI'-. 9 I

12 SHP 5050 NCE.OOGATTACHMENT NO. 1


JOB ORDER NO ~ : ~$ REPORT DATE: 2 REQUEST NO.

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponentItemMaterial C.SOther

Test Unit/ S/N ifjFreq./DiameterReference StandardCocuplant/Batch No.

TEST DATA REMARKS

ll~V

II r/"II /I A

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


LEVEL:~ DAT<:

I'EVEL:~- DATE:


Equip ID: 1-QT-107-CD . Train: 2 Equip Class:21

Drawing No.: 1-5151C~

~

~ ~

nction: EMERG DIESBL

System: DXESEL FUEL OXL

Equip Desc: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OXL DAY TANK

Building: AUXILXARY Room: CD EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM




Req'd Support Comp:



Comp Served: CD FUBL OXL DAY TANK

MPR:

Model: 36" D x 108" L, 465 GAL.

":Elem. Drawing: N/A

Wiring Drawing: N/A

Power Source: N/A

Walkdown: P Relay Eval : N

Comp Type: TANK (CAPACITY - 2 HRS PULL LOADOPERATION)

Xso Drawing:

Location: XN THE NW REGXON OP THE ROOM, 10 FEET NW OP THE GEN ENDOP DGCD INSIDE THE FUEL OXL DAY TANK ENCLOSURE, AT THB599 EL.



ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x108 L,465 GAL.


1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greaterthan the demand.



4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom,vertical tank.

5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a targe, flat-bottom, vertical tank.

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

D T 7

SRT: George G. Thomas (SB A) and Tom Huang (AEP) —10/7/93.

REF: 1. Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics DataSheet, Certified 4/5/93.2. Worthington Dwg it/ 700006BU3. Worthington Co. Fuel Oil Day Tank Calculation, 8/1 //74.

Anchorage: 1-QT-107-CD is a horizontal tank which sits on 2 saddles. Each saddle has 2, 1/4" thick plates,forming a "U", with no gussets. There are 2 - 5/8" anchors per saddle.

Cracks in the leveling grout on the concrete pad were identified. The SRT judged this acceptable since thestructural concrete pads are intact.

Horizontal Tank Analysis:Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Inertia = 2I + 2(ad*2) = 2((30"x0.25in"3)/1 2) + 2(15in"2 x (4"2)in"2") = 480in"4.

Results of Horizontal Tank Analysis show tank anchorage is adequate (conservatively using expansion bolts forthe 5/8" diameter Nelson Stud anchors), and Ref. 3 calculation contains saddle stresses check.

Interactions: Block wall has been confirmed by AESPC to have been evaluated in the IE 80-11 program.

Evaluated by: Date:

I l /Z ~! eW

DC Cook Unit 1


ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L,465 GAL.

Attachment: TANK Analysis Results

DC Coo4; Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 3of6

ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 Dx108 L,465GAL.

TANK Analysis Results

Step 1 —Input Data

a) Assumptions1. Tank is cylindrical, horizontally oriented and supported on saddles.2. Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel3. Saddles are uniformly spaced.4. Saddles overhang is less than spacing /2.5. Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under

the fixed saddle.6. Imposed nozzle loads are not significant.7. The tank foundation is adequate.8. Anchor bolts are cast in place or expansion type.

b) Materials

YesYesYesYesYes

YesYesYes

Weight of Tank + FluidWeight Density of Tank+ FluidSaddle Elastic ModulusSaddle Shear ModulusBase Plate Yield StrengthAnchor Type

c) DimensionsTank Diamete; DTank Length, LTank Thickness, tHeight of Tank+ Fluid C.G., HcgNumber of SaddlesSaddle Spacing, SSaddle Height, hSaddle Shear cross-sectional areaSaddle Weak Axis Moment of InteriaNumber of Bolt Locations / SaddleNumber of Bolts / Bolting LocationExtreme Bolt Spacing,

D'nchorBolt Eccentricity, eWeld ThicknessBase Plate Thickness

4.5 kips70.7 Ibs/ft"329000.0 ksi1150.0 ksi36.0 ksi

5/8 in Expansion Bolts

3.03 ft9.0 ft

0.19 in1.71 ft

6.0 ft2.38 in

15.0 in"2480.0 in"4

2.1? ft6.0 in0.19 in0.19 in



ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x108 L,465 GAL.

d) Anchor BoltsType = Expansion AnchorManufacturer = Phillips Stud (S)

Diameter = 5/8 inProduct Name =

Nominal CapacityPullout

3.17 kipsShear

3.79 kips

Concrete Compression Strength, fc' 3500.0 psi

Reduction ParametersCapacity Reduction Factor

Label1. Type of Anchorage

CheckYes

Condition Pullout1.0

Shear1.0

2. Installation Adequacy3. Embedment Length

4. Gap at Threaded Anchors5. Spacing between Anchorages6. Edge Distance7. Concrete Strength and Condition8. Concrete Crack Location and Size

Yes Installation is adequateYes Embedment Length = 2.38

inYes Gap size = 0.0 in

YesYes Edge Distance = 6.25 inYesYes Crack Size = 0.0 in

1.01.0

1.01.01.0

0.881.0

1.01.0

1.01.01.01.01.0

9. Essential Relays in Cabinets

10. Base Stiffness and Prying Action11. Equipment Base Strength and

Structural Load Path

Yes

YesYes

Essential relays are notpresent

Base strength and load pathare O.K.

1.0

1.0'<.0

1.0

1.01.0

12. Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Installation is O.K. 1.0 1.0

Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters?

Step 2 —The allowable bolt loads

Allowable Tension Load,Pu'llowableShear Load,Vu'.774 kips

3.79 kips


RB 0.1562

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS}GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet5of6

ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.

Step 4 —Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor

RW 17.7858


Allowable Anchorage Tension Load, PuAllowable Anchorage Shear Load, Vu

0.433 kips3.79 kips


alpha (Pu/Vu}

Vu /WbHcg /

D'cg/S

F2

0.111.13 kips/bolt

3.370.7880.2852.2361.804

Step 7- Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage

lambda 1

lambda uAnchor Acceleration capacity, lambda

1.507G'.715G

0.715 G

Step 8 - Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response

Maximum Saddle Spacing, Sc 13.42 ft


Saddle Stiffness, KsResonant Frequency of Tank in Longitudinal Direction

7230.98 kips/in125.34 Hz

DC Cook Unit 1

SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92Status: YesSheet 6 of6

ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat ExchangersDescription: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAYTANKBuilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM,Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.

4


ZPA 0.25 G




5mamaw

IC

The tank anchorage is adequate.

Coo

Component No. i QT- l 0"( -( i) Claaa

IIEIUll

Any pazticularprea the Seismic Review Teaa should pay axtra attention to1Yes No ~ (Xf yea, check items that apply.)

Anchor TypeAnchor DiameterAnchor SpacingAnchor NumberAnchor EmbedmentAnchor Edge DistanceAnchor GapAnchor Thread EngagementAnchor GripAnchor AngularityConcrete Crack

Others (describe bri.efly)

If there ia concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicableitem and explain.

l.2.3.4.

Hardvaro Maintenance Type Discrepancy.rawing Update Type DiscrepancySignificant Operability/Design Basis DiscrepancyOthers

Condition:! 'oo!6

Actions Taken:

Jog~

peaparad ByT'~~co Dace 4'+ ~ ~

"*12 CHP 5021.'CCD. 019ATTACHMENT NO. 1

IZ..» 890Bldg.

TVE. Moli>tH 5F'~. QP "C D" D~~.CCi-'P

IMSLQE IHE. TUEL OlL W.Y fh'tW-

Locatxon

Insta at on dwg. / Rev.


j'j4 5~a

Ql Q/I

EEEV. 4K&. MQR'TH APR D 5 19S

LEIIK~Q

FACE'~ WC,Rg8 (TVF


d. RQ~IL Date:Date:

Reviewed by:Qua ./Cert. InspectorT o.~l~ Date:

Construction chor Review Engineer


~ g

~ f

'i

y ~ i

~ ~ t

+Jl ~ > e e ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ - liI.

e 'l~l

~ - s.~ r

t L.S

e ~

~ ~

e ~

~ ~

R%K~SWKiRWWWW .

1 0 0 0

RRRSRSRSWWHHHHQL88558LL55WII~WHL 5HHI%55%L 8RESRE5555RWW&&55RRRRHRilN5%5%i% - %SIN6%5%5%RSMMRaIRMWWMWWWW

h 0

I

J l'la1

~ ~ ~ ~

SHP 5050 NDE-008ATTACHMENT NO. 1

UI.TRASONIC TEST REPORT

JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: g7 5 REQUEST NO. A

IDENTIFICATION

UnitComponentItemMaterialOther

Test Unit/ S/NFreq./Diameter ~Reference StandardCouplant/Batch No.

TEST DATA REMARKS

~ 7D

. 7$"

PERFORMED BY:

REVIEWED BY:


LEVEL:W DATE: /I EVEE' DATE:



SAMPLE LARS CALCULATIONS001, 005, 010, 011, 022, 023, 027 AND 030

RAI ITEM 8

This attachment contains thc following:

1. A 16 page document containing thc proccdurcs, input data, and rcfcrcnccs used in the Limited AnalyticalReviews.

2. The rcqucsted Limited Analytical Rcvicws: LAR IIs 001,005,010,011,022,023,027 and 030.3. Thc calculation used to resolve the outlicr gcncratcd by LAR022.4. The proccdurc used to address the outlier gcneratcd by LAR005.

PROCEDURES, INPUT DATA,AND REFERENCESUSED IN THI:I,IMnZDANAI,VSISazmm S

3. LIMITEDANALYTICALREVIEWS

3.1 Problem Statement

This Limited Analytical Review (LAR), performed within the scope of Unresolved Safety issue (USI) A46,evaluates the structural integrity of cable tray and conduit supports which have been chosen asrepresentative, worst case examples of the major different types of raceway support configurations withinD.C.Cook Nuclear Power Plants 1 and 2. Twenty nine sample supports have been chosen from the plantraceway support systems for evaluation.

3.2 Summary of Results

The critical interaction value and related comments for each of the raceway support evaluations in thisLAR are summarized in Table 3.1 below. Refer to the Attachments to this section for details of each of theevaluations.

D. C. Cook A46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway ReviewOctober 1995

page 3-1

Table 3.1 Critical Interaction Values

Interaction ValueLAR No.

001002

Members/Connections0.18 DL

~ ee

Anchorage0.68 3DL

Maximum0.68 3DL

003 0.50 OL 0.48 DL 0.50 DL004

K":005."j!:.:::::-„'i~

0.29 DL<@FOP'<g~

(LOW) ... OLe~~c'~p; 'e""w,'5'~< ~,'„e<'ew ''e< gxQD<p,%:e

0.29 DLItgQLKI

006007008009010011012013014015016017018019020021

023024025026027028029030031032

0.500.810.940.851.050.280.150.720.380.840.790.700.720.330.18low

0.770.250.55

*1~

0.750.14

~ e*

low0.120.68

DLDLDLLLDLLLDLOIDLDLLLDLDL

DLDL

DLDLLL

DLDL

DLDLDL

0.760.560.33

0.431.020.450.580.930.320.400.311.04

0.670.22

0.900.100;23

0.96low

low0.200.24

3DL3DLDLLLDLLLDLLL

30LLLLL

30L3DLDLDLDL

DLOLLL

30L

DLDLDL

0.760.810.940.851.051.020.450.720.930.840.790.701.040.330.670.22

0.900.250.55

0.960.14

low0.190.68

30LDLDLLLOLLLDLDL

30LOLLLDL

30LDLDLDL

O'D,L"':k

DLOLLL

30LDL

DLDLDL

DL Dead Load30L 3x Dead Load (Vertical Load Check)LL Lateral Load CheckRF Rod Fatigue Check

~f'i~/'::„':: Qellier*** Not used.

D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway ReviewOctober 1995

Page 3-2

i i m f a Tr v I i

Logic diagrams indicating the evaluation path taken to demonstrate the acceptance of each of theraceway supports are shown below. Note that the particular evaluation path taken for the support inquestion is defined in heavy outline.

LAR Nos. 003, 004, 008, 010, 012, 019, 020, 021, 023, 024, 030, 031, 032

START

8.3.1

Does the Support HaveVertical Dead Load CapacityWith Eccentricities ~ t.0 x OL?

Yes

Yes8.3.1

Directly mounted to or rigidlycantilevered from an adjacentstructural wall or ceiling?

+No8.3.7

Floor mounted?

; Ho

Yes

8.3.2

Does the Support HaveVertical Capacity ~ 3.0 x OL?

Yes

8.3.3

Does the Supped Have DuctileResponse to Lateral Loading?

Yes

8.3.4

Does the Support Have AdequateLateral Load Strength '?

Yes

No

l

8.3.5

Is the Support a Fixed- EndRod Hanger?

Yes8.3.5

Does the Support Pass theFatigue Evaluation?~ Yes

tfo

Pass AnalyticalReview

Outlier

(Rigid Mount)

D. C. Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway ReviewOctober 1995

page 3-3

LAR Nos. 005, 022

START

8.3.1

Does the Support HaveVertical Dead Load CapacilyWith Eccentricities ) 1.0 x OL?

No

Yes8.3.1

Directly mounted to or rigidlycantilevered from an adjacentstructural wall or ceiling7

8.3,7

Floor mounted?

No

Yes

8.3.2

Does the Support HaveVertical Capacity -,. 3.0 x DL?

Yes

8.3.3

Does the Support Havo DuctileResponse lo Lateral Loading?

Yes

INo

I

8.3.4

Does the Support Have AdequateLateral Load Strength 7

Yes

8.3.5

Is the Support a Fixed - EndRod Hanger 7

No

.V...1


Yes8.3.5

Does the Supporl Pass thoFatigue Evaluation 7

Yes

Outlier

(Any support failing OL)


page 3A

LAR Nos. 009, 011, 016, 025

START

8.3.1

Does the Support HaveVertical Dead Load CapacityW~th Eccentricities ~ 1.0 x Dt.?

Yes

Yes8.3.1

Directly mounted to or rigidlycantilevered from an adjacentstructural wall or ceiling?

No

8,3.?

Floor mounted?

l NoI

8.3.2

Does the Support HaveVeicaIG pocky 30xDL2

l Yes

Yes

8.3.3

Does the Support Have OuctgeResponse to Lateral Loading '7

Yes

8,3.4

Does the Support Have AdequateLateral Load Strength?

Yes

8.3.5

Is Ihe Supporl a Fixed - EndRod Hanger?

Yes8.3.5

Does the Support Pass theFatigue Evaluation '?

Yes


Outlier

(Floor Mounted Support)

jD. C. Cook AAG Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review

October 1995page 3-5

LAR Nos. 014, 028

START

8.3.1

Does thc Support HavoVertical Dead Load CapacityWith Ecccntricities ~ 1.0 x DL '?

Yes

No

Ycs8.3.1

Directly mounted to or rigidlycantilevered from an adjacentstructural wall or ceiting?

No

8.3.7

Floor rnounted2

No

Yes

8.3.2

Does the Support HaveVertical Capacity ~ 3.0 x OL 2

Ycs

8.3.3

Does the Support Have DuctileResponse to Lateral Loading 7

Yes

8.3.4

Does thc Support Have AdequateLateral Load Strenglh 7

Ycs

No

8.3.5

Is lhe Support a Fixed ~ EndRod Hanger '?

Yes8.3,5

Does the Support Pass thcFatigue Evaluation?

Yes


Outlier

(Trapeze Frames)


page 3-6

LAR Nos. 001, 006, 007, 017, 018, 027

START

8.3.1

Does the Support HaveVertical Dead Load CapacityWith Eccentricities ) 1.0 x DL '?

Yes

No

Yes8.3.1

Directly mounted Io or rigidlycantilevered from an adjacentstructural wall or ceiling?

8.3.7

Floor mounted?

Does the Support KavoVertical Capacity ~ 3 o x OL?

Yes

8.3.3

Does tho Support Have DuctileResponse to Lateral Loading '?

Yes

8.3.4

Does the Support Havo AdequateLateral Load Strength 7

Yes

8.3.5

Is the Support a Fixed - EndRod Hanger?

NoI

Yes8.3.5

Does tho Support Pass thoFatigue Evaluation?

Yes


Outger

(Rod Hanger Trapezes)

D. C. Cook A46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway ReviewOctober 1995

page 3-7

LAR Nos. 013, 015

START

8.3,1

Does the Support HaveVertical Dead Load CapacityWith Eccentricities ~ I.O x DL 7

Yes

Yes8.3.1

Directly mounted to or rigidlycantilevered from an adjacentstructural wall or ceiting?

8.3.?

Floor mounted?Yes

8.3.2

Does the Support HaveVertical Capacity 3.0 x OL '?

Yes

8.3.3

Does the Support Have OuctigeResponse to Lateral Loading 7

Yes

No 8.3.4

Does the Support Have Adequate'ateralLoad Strength 2

Yes

8.3.5

Is the Support a Fixed - EndRod Hanger 7

No

Yes8.3.5

Does the Support Pass theFaligue Evaluabon?

Yes

Pass Analytical/Review

Outlier

(Floor to Ceiling Supports)


page 3-8

3.3 Method of Solution

Hand calculations are performed employing the methodology outlined in Section 8 of Reference 3.6.4,"Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment.",Supportstructures are broken down, where applicable, into subsections which lend themselves to common, closedform solutions for structures subjected to static loading.

3.4 Allowables and Assumptions

The following is a compilation of allowable stress and load criteria used throughout the raceway supportevaluations.

strength of 36 ksi. AISC Specification allowables for Allowable Stress Design (Ref. 3.6.1) are used for thedead load analysis. For other analyses, the allowable stress is increased to 0.9 Fy = 32.4 ksi.

J2.5 of Ref. 3.6.1, is 0.3 x 60 = 18 ksi for dead load analysis. For all other analyses, 1.7 x 0.3 x 60 =

30.6 ksi is used.

i: Dimensions, properties, and allowables use'd to analyze variousUnistrut support system components are based on the Manufacturer's Catalog Data provided in Refs.3.6.2 and 3.6.3. These values are used for the dead load analysis and all other analyses. Values forUnistrut components commonly used at D.C.Cook are summarized below:

Unistrut bending moment: Ref. 3.6.3, p.23

P1000: 5080 in-Ib (allowable bending stress of 25 ksi)

Channel nuts/bolts Ref. 3.6.3, p.69

5/8": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 2500 Ib5/8": slip in P1000 or P3000: 1500 Ib1/2": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 2000 Ib1/2": slip in P1000 or P3000: 1500 Ib3/8": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 1000 Ib3/8": slip in P1000 or P3000: 800 IbBolts are assumed tightened to manufacturer's recommended values

r I: D.C. Cook embedded channels are Unistrut P1000 (or equivalent), galvanized, 12 ga. channels with a material yield strength = 33 ksi, modilied by the addition of 3/8 $ x 4"L

Nelson Studs at 12" o.c. Results of tests of modified channels (Ref 3.6.20) indicate a minimum pulloutcapacity of 6400 lb/ft. The mode of failure was ripping of strut material around the stud; stud remaining inconcrete. Using the AISC Allowable Stress Design allowable shear stress of 0.4 x Fy = 13.2 ksi on a

45'one

shaped slip surface results in an allowable pulloutof 13.2 ksi x n x (D + t) x t = 13.2 x 3.14 x (0.375 + 0.105) x 0.105" = 2090 Ib, therefore use the standardcatalog value of 2000 Ib, but not more than the allowable value for pullout of Unistrut channel nuts/bolts aslisted above. For all other load cases, use an allowable stress of 1.7 x 0.4 x Fy resulting in an allowablepullout of 3550 Ib, but not more than the catalog allowable value for the pullout of Unistrut channelnuts/bolts as listed above.


page 3-9

To summarize:

Pullout of embedded strut:(dead load analysis)

2000 Ib

2000 Ib1000 Ib

5/8" channel nuVbolt1/2" channel nut/bolt3/8" channel nut/bolt

Pullout of embedded strut:(all other analyses)

2500 Ib2000 Ib1000 Ib

5/8" channel nut/bolt1/2" channel nut/bolt3/8" channel nut/bolt

Concentrated loads may not be spaced closer than 12" apart unless the sum total ofconcentrated loads on any 12" of Unistrut length does not exceed the single loadallowable.

Reference 3.6.14, willbe used unless noted otherwise within the individual LAR's.

1/2"3/4"1

II

1-1/2"2 II

3 II

4ll

1.1 Ib/ft1.3 Ib/ft2.0 Ib/ft3.5 Ib/ft4.9 Ib/ft

11.1 Ib/ft16.6 Ib/ft

wide by 6" high) is 25 pounds per linear foot, unless noted otherwise within the individual LAR's.

h I: Concrete anchor bolt allowables used in alf analyses are based on Tables C.2-1and C.2-2 of the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4. The anchor bolt type must be known to use the maximum values.

Ifanchor bolts are'identified as "non-shell" type anchors on the PASS, then, per Ref. 3.6.12, the anchorsare either 5/8" Hilti"Kwik-Bolts"or 5/8" Phillips wedge-type anchors. Allother anchors must be identifiedon the PASS or they willbe considered "unknown." Unknown anchors require a reduction factor of 0.6 onthe allowable toads provided in Ref. 3.6.4, Tables C.2-1 and C.2-2.

Allconcrete anchors, known or unknown, shell or non-shell type, which are not loaded in tension by deadweight, require an additional reduction factor of 0.75 for the "Reduced Inspection Alternative", and,because one third of the anchor bolts (there must be a minimum of six) must be assumed to be "notavailable", another reduction factor of 0.67 must be taken.

The design concrete strength at D. C. Cook is 3500 psi. This requires a reduction factor of 0.875 to beapplied to the pullout capacity of all anchors. No reduction is required for the shear capacity.

Ifa tightness check has been performed, it will be so stated on the PASS and the "Reduced InspectionAlternative" reduction factors may be waived.

'D. C. Cook A<6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review

October 1995Page 3-10

r n or I

To summarize:

"Known" concrete anchors such as 5/8" Hilti "Kwik-Bolts", 5/8" PhillipsWedge-type, or 5/8" Phillips Red Head "self drills":

Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.8T5 x 0.75 x 0.67= 1.39 kipsVali = 3.79 kips x 0.75 x 0.67= 1.90 kips

Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.875 = 2.77 kipsVali = 3.79 kips

Allother 5/8" concrete anchors:

(not in tension by deadweight)

(in tension by deadweight)I

Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.83 kips (not in tension by deadweight)Vali = 3.T9 kips x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67= 1.14 kips

Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.875 x 0.6 = 1.66 kipsVali = 3.79 kips x 06 = 228 kips

All3/4" concrete anchors:

(in tension by deadweight)

Pall = 4.69 x 0.875. x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 1.23 kipsVali = 5.48 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 1.65 kips

Pall = 4.69 x 0.&'F5 x 0.6 = 2.46 kipsVali = 5.48 x 0.6 = 3.29 kips

All 1/2" concrete anchors:



Pall = 2.29 x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.60 kipsVail = 2.38 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.72 kips

Pall = 2.29 x 0.875 x 0.6 = 1.20 kipsVali = 2.38 x 0.6 = 1.43 kips

All 3/8" concrete anchors:

.(not in tension by deadweight)


Pall = 1.46 x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.39 kipsVali = 1.42 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.43 kips

Pall = 1.46 x 0.875 x 0.6 = 0.77 kipsVall=142x06=085kips



Shear-tension interaction limitations per the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4, Section C.2.11 willbe used to evaluate theeffect of combined anchor bolt loading.


Page 3-11

3.5 input Data

The hangers evaluated in this calculation were selected by the Seismic Review Team (SRT) thatperformed the raceway walkdown. The selections are documented in the Plant Area Summary Sheets(PASS), which are part of the project documentation.Pl ei i

Horizontal seismic accelerations are required for the Lateral Load Evaluation and the Rod Hanger FatigueEvaluations as defined in the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4.

Three options are presented in the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4, Section 8.3.4 for determining the horizontal seismicacceleration to be used in lateral load evaluations. Acceleration values for D.C.Cook corresponding toeach of the options are summarized below.

Elevation ZPA Building Option 1 Option 2 Option 3587633650609598612625651699

0.200.220.220.220.320.370.420.520.80

AuxAuxAuxDGBContContContContCont

1.211.211.211.211.211.211.211.211.21

0.630.690.690.691.001.161.311.632.50

0.940.940.940.940.940.940.940.942.50

Option 1: 2g scaled by the maximum of SSE/Bounding Spectrum (ZPA value controls)Option 2: 2.5*1.25'Floor ZPA (1.25 is for 'realistic'loor spectra)Option 3: 2.5'1.25 1.5'SSE ZPA (within 40'f grade)

Conclusion: Option 2 for Aux and DGB, Option 3 for Containment


page 3-12

The rod fatigue bounding spectra provided in the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4, Figure 8-9, are plotted below vs. theenvelope of the D.C.Cook 5% damping spectra for the Auxiliary Building and the envelope forContainment at El. 650'nd below. These curves are used to determine the applicable bounding curve inthe Fatigue Evaluation Screening Charts, Figure 8-10 to 8-14 of the GIP.

20

1.5

g 1.0

0.5

00.1

IIIIIIIII1

I II II II II II II II III II II II II I11I III II 1

I II'I II II11I I

r

I I I II I I II I I II'I'rI I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I II I II I I

111I I I II I II I Ir rr

I I II I II I

I I II I I III~ I II I I I

II,

Iis/ I

/

I s

I I II I I

1

I II I II I II II I ~INI II I II I II 11I I I

I 11I 11I I ~

I I ~

I II I I

I I yl1 I

I II I s

I I II I ~

I I ~

I II II I I

~ ssI I I II I I I

II I II I I II I I III~ III I I'I1111I I I II I I II I I I~ I I I

I II I I II I Issls I I ~

I I I II I I I

II I I II I II I I I~ I I I

I I I-rrrrgl I

~ II~ 111~ I I I

I ~ II I I

10

I I II I II 11I I II I II I II sl II I I

1 NI I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II I I II 111

I I II I I II I I I

I I I II I I I

I I II I I IfI I I I

I I II ~ II I I I

I 11I I I II I I II I I I

I I II I II I II I II I IIII I II I I

I I II I II I II I I111I I II I II I I

I I II I II I II I II I II I II I I111I I I-I rrrI I II I II I II I II I II I I~ ~ II I I

F~(Hz)

20

1.5

I 1.0

0.5

I-00.1

I II II II II I

H II II II II II II II II II I1 II II II II II II I~ II II I~ II II Is I~ II I~ II

I I I I II 1111I I I I II I I I II I I I I

I I SS'I I I I

I I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I II I I I IrrrrI I I I II I>I II I I II I I I II I III I I II I I I I~ I I II ~ ~ II I III I I I

I I II I IIs s~s

I I I I II I I I I

I I II ~

6508AdbctoA) I s s

I I ~ I I II

I II II II ~

I III II s

~ II II I

I II II III I

HII

I ~

I

I) I

I II I

I

I II I I I~ I I I~ ~II

II I I

I I I I~ I I I

I I I~ I I I

I~ I I I~ ~ II I I-rrrsJ I I I~ 111

I I I

IIII

I II II II 'II I11I I

II

I/ I

II ~ ' ls

I I I ~ II~I I III~ I

I s

I III II ~

I II s

I ~

~ ~

s I II I I~ ~ II I I~ III I I~ IIII~ ~ I

10

s

I II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II I

1 II II II I

II I

~339I II II I~ ~

~ ~

II II II II II II II II II II II ~

I II II II II II II ~

I I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I II I ISSII I II I II I II I II ssI I II I II I II I IrrrI I II I IIII I II I II I II I I111I I II I II I II I I~ ~ I11 ~

I I I~ I ~

I I I~ ~ I

Frequency (H )

(D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review


i vl in r nn Po r

All threaded rods used in raceway supports at O.C.Cook are manufactured all-thread rods.Some rods, however, are anchored using the welded rod coupler detail shown to the right.The SRT was concerned that the coupler material is not as ductile as the rod material,particularly after being welded. 2.

Fatigue tests were performed on O.C.Cook threaded rods with the welded rod couplerdetail (Ref.3.6.23). These tests show that for the same ductilitydernand, the number ofcycles to failure using the welded coupler detail is approximately half the number of cyclesto failure using typical "nutted" rod connection details at O.C. Cook (Ref. 3.6.6, Table 8-2).

I

The test data points for the welded coupler detail are plotted below on Figure 8=5 from Reference 3.6.6(this figure was used to develop the fatigue evaluation screening charts in the GIP). Each test data pointrepresents 3 tests (6 tests total) on 5/8" rods with an applied axial tensile preload (ITT) of 2.2 ksi (500 lb.)The test data points lie above the "2/3 Strain Acceptance l.ine", which represents the ductility demand vs.cycles to failure acceptance criteria for field-threaded rods. Therefore, in these LAR's, in order to coverrod-hung raceway supports that have not been selected as LAR candidates because of lower weight orlonger length, but which may have welded coupler anchorage details, Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluations willconservatively include the procedures specified in the G1P for field-threaded rods.

3.20

FATIGUE DATAFOR THREADED RODS

COMPEER. ~INST. CVRV8 W/ flGD THRIVED

2.80

2.60

3 2a0

P 2.20

a1.60

1.40

ACCEPTANCE LINE

aa06 ltae~~~«Ildt40W4c AQ(.

1.20 0

1.001.008+00

NOt5lAUZED OVOllUIYDo&NO

O. C. Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway ReviewOctober 1995

page 3-14

3.6 References

3.6.1 "Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design", 9th Edition, American Institute of SteelConstruction, lnc. Chicago, IL, 1989.

3.6.2 "General Engineering Catalog", No. 10, Unistrut Building Systems, GTE Products Corporation,Wayne, Ml, 1983.

3.6.3

3.6 4

"General Engineering Catalog", No. 12, North American Edition, Unistrut Corporation, Wayne, Ml,1992.

I

"Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment",Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification UtilityGroup.

3.6.5 "Design of Welded Structures", Orner W. Blodgett, James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, July1976.

3.6.6 "Seismic Evaluation of Rod Hanger Supports for Electrical Raceway Systems", EPRI NP-7152-D,March, 1991.

3.6.7 "Cable Tray and Conduit System Seismic Evaluation Guidelines", EPRI NP-7151-D, March, 1991.

3.6.8 "The Performance of Raceway Systems in Strong-Motion Earthquakes", EPRI NP-7150-D,March, 1991.

3.6.9 "Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment Anchorage" EPRI NP 5228-SL, Revision1,Volume 1, June, 1991.

3.6.10 AEP Guideline No. 18.3, Rev. 4, 4/9/86: "Guide for Cable Tray Loading"

3.6.11 Test Report 91C1681-02, Testing of D.C.Cook typical Unistrut attachment brackets for rod hungcable trays.

3.6.12 AEP Drawing No. 1-2-EDS433-14, Sheet 1 of 2, 5/31/91.

3.6.13 "Longitudinal Load Resistance in Seismic Experience Database Raceway Systems", EPRI NP-7153-D, March 1991.

3.6.14 AEP Document No. 02-0120-1097, Revision 0, Page 3 (Rigid Conduit Weights)

3.6.15 Letter from I.C.Huang of AEP Service Corporation to Steve Anagnostis of Stevenson andAssociates, 1/10/94, re: as-installed conduit weights for raceway supports LAR011 and LAR017.

3.6.16 "Rigid Frame Formulas", A. Kleintogei, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1952.

/.D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review


3.6.17 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Drawings:

1-1594-41-1460-751-1528-511-1525-571-1464-83

3.6.18 AEP Guideline No. 18.2A, Rev. 0, 6/27/86: "Guide for Cable Tray System Design".

3.6.19 Telecopy dated 4/29/94 from I. Huang of AEP to Steve Anagnostis of Stevenson and Associatesregarding as-installed cable tray and conduit weights for LAR's 1,3,5,9",10,16,18, and 22.

3.6.20 Letter from I.C.Huang/AEP to Steve Anagnostis/Stevenson and Associates, April 7, 1994-resultsof testing of D C Cook modified embedded Unistrut,

3.6.21 Stevenson 8 Associates Design Report, AEP Raceways 82C200-02, Cable Tray Testing-Analysis and Report, 9/30/83.

3.6.22 Telecopy from I.C.Huang/AEP to Steve Anagnostis/Stevenson and Associates, May 6, 1994-Field information concerning LAR011 (bolt spacing and conduit spans).

3.6.23 "Low Cycle Fatigue Tests on 5/8 inch Threaded Road" by Dario A. Gasparini, P.E.IPh.D., Dept. ofCivil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University for Stevenson 8 Associates, March 25, 1992.

D. C. Cook A<6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway ReviewOctober 1995

page 3-16

REQUESTED SAMPLE LARCALCULATIONS001,005,010,011,022,023,027,030

CUENT

Fb ~KMJOB No. IS' SHEET OF

Stl.'VenSOn and ASSOdateS

HlA 5rruc rural Maclra alca I

Coarultrag Eagiaaerrag Frrra

./9

CUENT

%6DC 4 ZAZ-ooi

Stevenson end Associates

Il A SrrnclnrohMochoalcolCoaoolliag Englnoorlng flrra

O5' C7

~cr /(

CUENT

SUOJEGT

gd g~g< Zs4- oo/


5IA Sauctural.Mechoolrsl

coasu!5og Knylnoaanq Few

~. aoP

c

Or8 ~Adds

CUENT

smu acr

ce ~ ~M-oatStevenson and Associates

R h Souelvwl.MechanicalCoasulaao Kayiaoorlaa Flies

sa / Il

'Os6fyLZXt$g C

OMIQN-

~Fthm<

EHVDpQ..'sr.r,', . ss IIIII~1WT~ 7 I' ~ ~ '4I g. > . ~ 'I>y~

$I,V-RLl

s

S

yV

0'cow vtYC'IsgL

I

slI

Isl Ifs

s P",s

Is

I II

II

'ag)~gL @0

~rSI6,CWiW. 80K4 Q'IIILT4)~

IL 4"

yss

t,Mss 's& s'

ss

~ +Jlgt s' I LLI~ t 1, tN.IHP B.

631'- 0"

.=r arS Wt+~~I.SI~gq~

g'laos'r. IL~"e~

$ 3ss

I'3s„'s3y ~ II CIJLMIS (TC0

$ $ I

Skt"~h"s CI MGib

gs IIlg ss

gs, gII

~~IoO ao IIEr~rrIar

WI5 ~Et OVK IIEET WO

GLKVhToR..

~PPoRY ¹ 2ACeVa rL. LL cO1Lo"

wY'g4iW.

Qf&Ar

II5I~P

~ (tPIlfyl.

+PC~~'

1 cAOAling,,

II

I II III

» Y,'

I

~l

n,>/sr>'4.

Z4L+ g» ml»)>VS

~:

fdJla»» t i» t» %A» ~ »»A»» e P»»»J,

Al-'PfdPP tL

Na>22,15t 5 lts5IFT

glc%$Ppi'>'h~

x wan ar» a tat u»»Ie»'sr&.s.»»~~ ag

12.444 LSSlI=T

II»C I5

~ l

I2,55t' $5/FT

1S;hLS>iFT

6,tA C

GIAN 693

10.4$ L$5lFT zCnmD

OmN

'z4. 5(o4 $5rFt'y»

v:c&tsN)~~

AlRm+ C1 6-4

sk@i 6~'4

1Q.625 LBSf FT

YAM-FS

2 .c,t23

l»r

. 1LQI

g» )II

hllKHHVf

cd&'4'IGLOO

g»» I»ll

4'T%lC SVRh4 C46. I»QY WO

5 LCVh'To@»

SUPPLY ¹ <—R.» %L C»5»I»r 0 ~

At'TUEL VVEJC WT5 FOR LAR4'

COH001T lOEHTlFI CATION UNKNOWN

0L

CUENT

r


II A s<ruclural MoehaalcalConeulling Enylnooeny l'leaa

<85$ 'D9 l'ScM/oZ

CUENT

ggu~ + '4@8 S


II A svuciurel.Mechanicalcon oui liay fagiaoorlny Fa w

SS JQx C.»

(


Q A Suwtvral MoehoaleolCosevl8og Eaylaoorlay Fires

CUENT

sum ccr ~+'>DQ 2ccm

4 S

CP

CUENT

Smuem

P~rrStevenson and Associates

Q A SnueNral MechanicalcohsulUay laglaoo<lnp n<m 4'4rx Lad- Wc ID'

CUENT

SUOJ~ 4 b 4AZMSC'IC /HPO auaac 6 oa c

Rcvcnson and Assodates

H A SteuccusahkechaalcalCoa>ulpop Kaplaeeclop

Fitch's~-cv5

AY~re M ~roB ~>PzAce ~ W~. ma.

~ ~


Il A Svuctuwl Moeho nlcslCoaeu!5'nginooenp Fans

Z4Z-oosS zs 9

p'g. A~

1%AC~ear>

~ ~

We.ckc@D gooYo RaD Cc&PL/JJhTo L 'j$',Q RgoUklPWSLD (mK)&EE VETAlL"C-C"

~ ~ ~OQ ~

~/~ TAI

2'-to

U-eu MPspp >Q

I11

2/g IAMC8 I AN P3

U - t'LAMPSQvQ

f "1/g'

'- 4/g"5~~ 6"

l AM-XIO I AMP

&EEPETA'lL

Ie,"(n@l AN-CGQ

)1 p gI

f A,N< CG [ l AM-C82

g1/ Il

2'D

I

l

/g. UN&BRUT ~

BoLl(~) i

I

lqx2x2 x)0 L

I

I

I

llI

I

I

8 MC5>t=-0

) I

I )0+g"

DEgRv'T

PETAlL "c.-c'PXT <wI'poRT

TNP-~ vPFg~

')>r5A

HOTeAGHL=E

'34 l8:46 FROn AEPSC NUCLEAR DES

LEFT'O RIGHTIA."-2840(o-I, 2.98 LBS / FTI'I~"- 50IIZR-I, 3.2.2 LK5/FT<r~-- SOIOSV-I, S.ZZLS>r Vr

I - 9957R-I, I.73 LBS/FT

'q ~ I"-205I3-I, I.BI( 6 LHS/FT~ ~

~ j,Pp~ o gg~

PAGE.OQ4

ACTUALNElGWT5 FOR LAR ~5

2 3O

'R&KPPeon

U-cLkNPs

a'< ~~z

We.Eke@& BOD~o Hot Cc vPLQK~-XC L 3/4. nu >aV4C>wctu> I'~eg&EE OFTA1L "c-c"

l0. 95 LB5/FT'29.Hr 5 L65IFT

3~C8 3AM PZ

t-PIUM@EL. 633'~f

g 'pg&hDP

U-CVd4P5C~Q

yl1

w.~ra".

3

1t

3g Q~)

LEFT TO RKHT0"-9Z.G2PS-I) IO;75 L55/FT4'-'MBPS-I fO.GHL65/FTlANxto )ANTE .

t-3 g

LEFT TO RIGHT

I4. 291'o LD5/FT

25 'H54L65/'I-T

3 AN-'C80 I~~CG t I AM-C82

l 25cg'xP "SF~ (TYP)

I.FI-T TO RISIIT

+I.95 LSD/FT34.Z7 LB5/ FT>2,77 I.Pv/ FT


R A svuctu( ~ I Mn«hnnlcnlCnnlulgng Knglnuuslng

Elf'UENT

D2 o

4AM-use

Joulk>. +~~+~ sHEEf~ oFM~

III O8

LJ.

OW

CUENT

~guECT D O

Stovenson and Assodates

II AStrwte re lkoAonlcs1cosoullsy Ksylaoooay Fleas

o

ECUENT

muccr > C

XeN. ~<~<~~ SHEET 3 OF~~


II AS(naciecabHocbaelealCoasulliny Enolsoerlsa I«w

id' ~Z

CUENT

~c

Stevenson and Assoc|ates

imA slnscturel Mechanical

Coastal'5aO Kngtnoedsg Fhm

CUENT

l


ERA structural Hocbaaiea'I

coneulsny Englnoodna Fcce

CUENT


H A SlluclulnlJlochn nlcnlCon<utgng Cnglnuurlng finn

7d

~ C

CUENT

mum

Stevenson end Assodetes

Wh Srrac<arsl Mschsslcsl

Cssralriarr taylssarlsy Firrs

xg

Rcvcnson and Associates

RIIL Suuctu<al Mochaalcal

Con o villa@ Esglaeorlay E'l(a

CUENT JOG No.


NmA ScwNral htoehonlcal

CoaevlCng Caglaoeslsy Fwa

o5'

CUENT


S A Stiactvial MechanicalCoaouluny Eaoisoeclsy flea

CUENT

SUBJECT


RlA Sltvc(v ral MoAoalcsl

Conoul5sa Kaylnoorlao Faa

l/

~ ~

CUENT


Il A S<oadvrol.Woc4alcslCoaoultley Eaglnoo(lay Foes

O

ECUENT


E5A sv~ousal Mechaaical

Coa>vlsay Ksglaoerlay Fns

LCUENT


l5 A Snvctssal l4ochaaks1coao~hay Esyisoonay nba

d

CUENT


El A Suvelurst.MechanicalConsolan'aylneorlng fl<w

24&a 0

CD'c

CUENT JOO Na MS O SliEEE ~& OF ~F


l5 h strvciscn MechanicalconovlUne ssolssorlnp fires

/z

CUE~r

SUOJECr


II A suuelucol MechanicalConouluna Esglaoorlsp Fifa

.<'( (

(S ag ~ I W4 ~ ~ I (p'rf +

att/+ ae a ~~ ~, ACTUAI WEIG

! FOV LAR~IOQJIrJaQ.

I, ~,~ ~

ei tV

~ ~ r,'JI g"

Jttr .

~ ~ 'I+a ~~ e~ r ~ ~ ~

t

Sr

3c',J IS

~ ~ ~

I ~ ~J

~ f

r(fvyt tva~ ~ ~ r

th)~ I

. a(htJ (JC.S'.

I

I

&PPoRT ¹ )0~ ~ ~

t at

te~ I'

I ~ t ~ *rat

~ ~~t

~

~~

~

~)'jest I

~'J ge

(JJ

CI

R

~ I"-'253I- I

~~ I b'I LBS/Pg ' '.')Dz I"-2528-I~(IS(ng LES// I-T ~

N0.

a I(IQ. - 'I 0 f(S 0 4. - I

z I,(I5 LB5/I=T I ~ '.,~'C

~ I

r ~

ml~la ~*

IA I

I

~Jm!I ~

(JJ: I ~

(SJ '

/IQ..a, ~ I

S

II

et~ te)

~ fI

~ ~

~ r

~ I

rrt ~~ ~ t

t ~ra I~,

I~

J J'I ~ ~ ~ e

~ 'I

~i

I ~

~ ~~ ~ ~

4-'+bI(JPY-f,IOIIl.LR5/ FT

~ ~

r~ $ rat ~

1i,.(p rI''I

~ \~ ~

~+'|- 8(l&qFf-I~ IOI6 LSD/~: "$l:

I ~ ~

I~

I 'a ~

~ ~

t t ~,C ~ 'I ~

1 ~ g)y; Nr. I kgu(r

~ ~ ~ I \\

~ g ~ I ~

I

I"- 9957R-I ~ 'I ~

'i75'LB>/I:T ~ . I'

I"-coNOUjT'.77 LM/i-"7 '~

COiOuITJ .

'7s70 Leih/ F.'.T i~ I ~ ~

~ Qg, ~I

er rt

~ ~ ~ '

~ +A ~

:j„t

'JI

lt.

lai

JCJ!4 ICJ'CJ r

I I;i ~

gt t ~ I rINa~ Ia

~q

~ rTlt

~ ~C

~ a IM N

~ ~

\ ~'V

(ea I'IH

I~ ~

r) ~ ~~ ~ >V,.:

QI(J 'J

r~ ~

r'. J~ ~

l CT C7Ji.tt FROHT ~ ~ ~ ~

TRAY MIGII76 L

2;l,07 M5/k7 C

I9, M, .LE'J/ PTJ: ~

20.08 LP&/FT '

REAR

IGT.- I5I CT- X I I

~ al

Jg REAlZ

~ r

( ~ I

n > ca'I

~C ~

(

n..a!LRS/Xr~ J

I'"''I

80 LB5lPT'l't..

CI

tl. Ii tait)VL"~ . ~ /

~ ..

j; ~

TRAY L, TQ fZ '-':., ~

ICT- C(l ~: -; .(ri .,aI CT- Ce „ t,s,".'> ~ ~

a]))Sg J( 'a

I ~

~ I ~ r>

a4"

~ r r g4"recco~ 1 ~, Korrl

~ ~

~ I ~'I~

F- bC ~ 4

~Ite)o Sel I~ ~

4 Ieh

~r Oe~r4e r

~ vrouw

SUPPoRT. ¹ >0

~g

I I ~

so ~

aClvej

IS

spl I h~ o

r'

~ r ~ I

rI

~ \sg

I

~DeOeS ISr\,

I

'

"rll,'r

r

, ~

~ ~

11'J „i ~~

~\I 'I

IIII

I

~ @

~ ~~I's ~ L ~

ff K

IsosrtI

CutltfP

If>c

'f

K ~ L.-e ~

'' e'rie

J" ~rKr /I~" ~ \

'PI

r 'o

Qfttr

J,I1 Is..IJIC I

IJ ~

I 'I I ..'~ ~

I. I IIkl+'Cr~ ~

s 'I'',I s'I'lrs«I S

S I'I II JI

I:II sI I . I

f:4~3 .I ~ II I)'Ios II I ~I.'ll II' ~ ~I II II .Il II II ~I,II

@Ager

I II ~

~

IlI ~ I

slrl ~

I I~'

I IIII~

I I ~

I ~ e

~ ~ o~ I

~Ce6'I\$ rr ~

e. IlI II ~ ~~ ~ I ~s ) ~ I

i ~I

I I~ IS ~~ e',I ~~ I ~

.IL.'

Ie

ICI Cl

etel ~ ~ore e%%

~ ~ re tA~ o e'I ~ ~ ~

~ rrr' ' 'I~ rsrr

~ ~ slee o~ ~ leer

,r)I ~ ( ~ ~

ro .'goJ'sA tpAtr I II(

'I

~ ~ O. „. Jgpq ~q I

<tr "~

ef}e I~IAII A I

~ t.'~\

ISnrICIrs

AALU

II ~

'le ~

AA

'

~ I ~

Its!I'e.t'

I: -rr ~ A.04

~ St.s'r 1 J')'

I~ ~

I

Ie CIIJ)

I'

)!I"r.. ~

IIA

~ ~

J'" ~ r .

I

rs I I InI''A"~ ~ 'rt IeorSIII

Ilsr't tt"

'g Ietll 'r t

0 CCW 5'S


@IA Structural Mechoslcil

Cosovlllay Eaylaooclny Fam 6

SUOJFCT

4 d 844&DC Coen

STEVENSON& ASSOClATES

a slntctwo4nochonlcotconwtttng onglncottng tlrm

H8'SS rD> rica"ro/ M~A/

STEYENSON5, ASSOCIATES

0 lttvclw04MchonlcolconwNny enqlnoodnp Arm

SUOJEGT AgA z449

OCO

tU

S

JOB No. ++ ~~~ ~ SHEET~~ OF~~

SUBJECT JOB No. ~~~++~ SKEET'=OF~~/


a sliucturo4neehonlecAconwWAg ong'Inoohng Nm

DOC~ b~r~ JDu-o'er'

SUBJECT JOB No. o 5SHEEf OF/~


a aovchroHnochoNcdCOhWNAQ Ohglhlhrlhg Sftl

D2 Caom ~imS4M-w/'r'ASE

rap Wca-

S Xd'

SUBJECT SHEET 0F

STEVENSONK ASSOCIATES

0 IIWCfutCHAOChQhICCICOAWIIIAPCAQfhtOAlg fllfh

844-Oi/HA2~ JDW P ag /0/ ~Nl

0I/I5UJ

~ 0

CLIENT

amECT

Qa Stevenson and Associates

A suvctvtal Mochoslcolconeulusq ssolhttclly Flra

g ~ ~ S


a slrvcluroHn+chantcolconwmng nnglnonnng Arm

xo/ ~ j6

CUGNT


8 A stnaclvwl Hechaslcalcosevhisy tsglooonng fna

SUZeRT.-To—= jPSRS~„"~~-~SUPPORT ...mHF NSro85-V"~) .. 'd'

8'k3'~ i~"L'2

24 27/ ii&

2Q.:ply Il

22 pal'2I ~u.

20~ r-

FL. EL. SSS'-o

«~~l.~8>, 8 QQp

19lB i>

- e rt)ylo

]~. r> 'lb

isio

Sf 3~X/qL---=~V---'-'A=---A'~.)5UI'f'opT AHCRog. PiN,

PLBX i SL.P. C.OTtx 0)q>

bc. PI > ~) @8' 4 ~l@

>0

x)qola

M'M.H'.—..s ...(TYI',)

~ms'eor.,Y=—ASQQo.R..piM~ioMG(T~P)

25 . 7/')>8

sJ@

~hebc

:. 1ND<kNP N~CWC kg po%ERDoNKLD c.. cooK NuciEp,p PLAN~

. DP-. B<. N. MAa~R ...DATE: E4. BB&'-.o."........BUILp'1N&,"AUX.: LoC.P,YiOH RvJGw, can.;.:.PiPE .-YUQHEL JN/7 @ 4

SR GHEE RH ant~ AGEE LAP go pg

. ATTACHMENT NQ.3

ypP

'~Yt<lC ) )J~

~>~vcr~'ue>oW'ery+~

g ~un~ sun~

LoQ Bod 5o ]JF YT SvPPi&TMlS SuFPoR~ Ch)F iu Rv)<V'@Pc 'Yu~)UF L Gun-<

Phoo

g/Wq//~

lIII

I

tl

5I

7r

5

pig Acx EoLTI+'ovC~I)

)l0

lo

+% "zg~g',dy~ 4v t

}/ ga

/4Apg'3 glO

ATTACHMENT NO. 1COOK NUCLEAR PLANT

A-46 RACEWAY EVALUATIONSLARoll

CONDUiTNO.

(SEEATTACH.3)

10

CONDUXT SIZEAND TYPE

3/4" EMT

1" EMT

1" EMT

1 1/2" RIGIDSTEEL

RIGIDSTEEL

1 1/2" RIGIDSTEEL

2" RXGXDSTEEL

2" RIGIDSTEEL

3" RIGIDSTEEL

3" RIGIDSTEEL

2" RIGIDSTEEL

2 i'IGIDSTEEL

3" RXGXDSTEEL

CABLE TYPEAND SIZE

XN CONDUIT

1-12/C f12 XLA

2-2T/C f161-STP g16

1-4/C g7/3.8

1-4/C g7/18

1-4/C g7/18

1-3TC g41-1/C g4

1-4/C gl2

1-3TC g2/01-1/C g2

1-3TC g2/01-1/C g"2

1-3TC g21-1/C g4

1-4/C /12

1-3TC g4/01-1/C g2/0

POUNDS PER FOOTOF CONDUIT AND

CABLE

0.97

0.73

0 '92.87

2.87

2.87

3.81

3 '27 '17 '13 '23 '28 '9

BASIS FOR WEIGHT.CALCULATION

(SEE LXSTED ATTACH. NOS.)

5 & 7C

5 & 8B

5 & 13B

6 & 7C

6 & 7C

6 & 7C

6i 9i & 10

6 & 7C

6, 9, & 10

6, 9, & 10

6, 9, & 10

6 & 7C

6c 9,.& 10

f

)p)

i ~ '

~giant~ II%IS

n)a~a<~) gg O

l8)

la)

hl

4l

0

88rn

'rMKAF.

'i%%f QSÃl.

I%f4Nr>

%% .Pi~

I%$4~C ~

5 ~

~ )+

~eatI

~03

<iS

ClOtl~0z,.'

lRE

J /J ~

'P

A ~

CUENT

C.AQ 5


Il llstevcwcal HochanlcalCDlllll4lligKllglhoollhO Fcm

GNAT iDP ~ - os ~ezra ~.

CLIENT

SmuECT 4+6


Q A Sttuatutal Nathan(calCaaeulUntt Eaelnaatlng fltta

SX i&~Zo r

GUENON

sujet~ 8' CA/Z ~


Q A Snueivr ~ I.MecLanicalConevlsny Kayisoocag Firm

SZ

< s''

~ s

~nno5r

~I

GSZC-P2.

~~

CADirt hsf'Lo

~ l

l gQQQ+ C5»

I>sGSZC-CS18. 5'2 I.B5/ I=T

tt t'Sll'~ ~o

~ mrs" ZOO~JA 0

3 - M.'T8"Z.9.'ISLETS/ T

PIOOO

Op L

GUPPY%

nAS:Slf

+/DAN

LI'»A'bSECT 'AA''07 d'iJ gp~~~'- IZ+KC-Z. <A4 ~~I 65(PT

I5i01

ItIIgPy,I» gO~ ~

1'COT

scrrrrH m v sum's Au

~ ~

~ t, ~, ~

~ ~

Z.'» 7SGM 2.4.A 4 I.65/ PX

O

DI

0DClm

Ci7

C)

ACTUAL VJElC HT5 FOR 4/AR:~ZZ

IQCMTIPICATIOH QF It <, Il/2." g C,D'5UNKHOWH

g~o7 Tg

1I'

JCC.N> 2

L~t%555o Lk(Tft3

ii~ IIIililI

I'O'I~

I'it+It &to

ue Octal. A

LI'-44'4

SECT

'A'A'g'll

co-.%'tt cor ~ ~

l'a

I&i('ii~ I 4 CoiIOIItt

BOVTEM MhY SVPT'5 PEAN VlEW~ ~

t

Pg M, fOX

CII. I.HM4IIIII%CWTX II'IC~ 'll.

Egad o SHEEf OF

CCW 5 dPd

c

STEVENSON5. ASSOCIATES

a Itntcfvtctmocttantcolconutttlnp onplnoottntt Ilrm

0s5 zD8 Pea 659 &~<9

gyy 4 @f82/8 ~4..

OCO

tUK

SUBJECT

4+5 848~JOB No. SHEET~UQF

STEVENSON5, ASSOCIATES

a Auelvcahnoe~cantina ongfnoodng nrm b

0

SUMFGT

STEVENSONK ASSOCIATES

o ttructurotrnnchontcolconautNng nnptneertnq nrm

0 0 0 0

g1l @l <

pl l Qll

I

'4 ~, ~ ~

:cga-TKg A-g

SEE-.: DETAK. A

4 ~ Ill

e I

fL.Gl 6l2-0"

SUNEGT


0 ltmchnol4lochohlcolconeNnp onplnoonnp turn

A5s ro+&W 9 uzi

5r

sussex

STEVENSON8( ASSOCIATES

SUBJECT JOB Ho. +~~~ SHEET &OF~~


a sovclvrounochoMolCchNNho Ohglhccdho Alhl

844- oP 2PAz7

ESP

SUBJECT

STEVENSON8c ASSOCIATESCOhSVINhg OhQIA40tlhg flllA

Goo~ errS/D C

0

Or'/

O

S

SUBJECT JOB No

STEVENSON8( ASSOCIATESconwmng onpHoorlng am

STEVENSON5 ASSOCIATESconweng onplnoonnp Arm

Mrz P3

~w//7M 5 z,S0

g 1/

SUBJECT lPIIHF.STD/K 0 SHEET F OF


o Etructrrrolrnochonlcotconsrrtttng ongtnoortng arm 0

su~Oa7 ~ F

O

6w/i 2STEVENSON

8t. ASSOCIATESQ ltntchl<OHTi4ctMtnlcnl

cntuttlnp ongtnoorlnp tttm

STEVENSON8c ASSOCIATES

o structurotrnoctronlcclconruttlng onglnoorlng llrm

S

Ore

ltttt

CCC 5 /-/C. 7

STEVENSON8c ASSOCIATES

o rrruclrrrcHnochanrcclconrrrrtlng onprnoodnp tlrm

SUBJECT JOB Ho.


a ttructvrctrnochcnlcnlccnwtttnp onglnoortnp hrm

SUBJECT

+6 84r8 sZ

JOB No.

STEVENSON8 ASSOCIATESeonsuenp onplntorlng tern 7 %imam WC,

fooll((fIo%~

(((oA~S))1)OI SAC'lh.

r el(«UNh

\'o Oe(ll 'IAI(

~

1( ) ( r 4 9( (4

Alta Ci>fV14)

f(IOA IIII'1o

,h4<)('() telo IOtfftfgWOV(f

~ ~ If~rSOT'TEN lRAYS—

NC&c~~iCI,All

II f(IIIKO ho CIAan t1'I'11~'Wb

o [lo ~ I'~ 0 ~

~ ~

I(( ~ ( loC(OKAY C COSMIC

lLCLIAt IAAI(f

COnll((((n(% (Oftf IIO t~(fAS 0

~L. 01'4CC IIO- 1

~ I,WI((AS'5

t. ((A(I4LI('IOATC I(.1( '%1.

COL 17

~ I(fII)i/~AIII1AII A(I

K> I(IOI

Cr Aflgis'It"I'Ia.

a)It)fAt4 1S

rCCTIC((I A A '

~

~ ~

~)J

LC1~'(f V

tC C44

2c C~SI ~ 1

2C'CW i 1(J(

~A -zc

~ I

I ~

II~ I

IIII. l

gpP T'IIAY5-~ww

SUBJECT ...SZC/5 9o


o ssrvctwosrnochonrcolconsurrlnSS onynoorhq rrrrn

o >~iZAg- o So

2oarÃrww)ewe 8c„bp3 -ro

0rrs

ro

Og

QC

SUBJECT

ZAN>r

STEVENSON& ASSOCIATES

0 IoMclvfokhochnnkclConukonp onplnoohng ilrm

9'TEVENSON

8( ASSOCIATES0 SlcUClvt04IhlChohtCN

COAWNA9 OA9414OEIA9 llCN

SUBJECT JOG No. 6/ SHEET~ OF


0 oltMcIvcoMlochofllcolconsvNng onglnoodng tlcm "r'O

0C/l

UJCC

2"

5/8 ROD BENT AROUNDPIPE AND BOLTED INSIDE

P1000 ANGLE

I

~ ~

II

5/8 "EXPANSION ANCHORS

EMBEDDED STRUT 2'-0"

2'-6"31 ~

10" PIPE

1'-0"

CRANE WALL

VIEW A-A

o ALL ANGLES ARE 3X3X1/4

o PIPE PENETRATES CRANE WALL AT EL. 603' 10AND RUNS UP INSIDE CRANE WALL TO A JUNCTIONBOX AT EL. 625'-6". THERE IS A LATERAL SUPPORT ATEL. 610'. NO OTHER SUPPORTS EXCEPT PENETRATIONAND JUNCTION BOX.

o PIPE LAYOUT SHOWN IN DRAWING 1 —1460 (SEESECTION 1X-1X AND DRAWING 1-1525).

UNIT 1, LOWER CONTAINMENTCONDUIT 1A1: 10" PIPE

D. C. COOKA-46 RACEWAY WALKDOWNPASS ID//: RACE-1>1, LAR //2

CALCULATIONUSED TO RESOLVETHE OUTLIER GENERATED BY

LAR8022

89C1570-HF-OOI

QUENT C/ cuccc ~ a"~—


mmA Sauctuccl Mochoalccl

Coaoulu ap Kaplaocrlup Puca

cc

CUENT nrem ran


Q A Stractaral.MochankalConrrrttintt Enpinoortnrt Firm

CUENT

SUOJECT

Stevenson and AssociatesI A Sgupturnl MnpbnnlpnlCpneuliing Englnnoeng Fgw

CUENT

SUBJECT

5 SHEET ~ OF ~~

. CF


R A STTHSTE T~ I MSOiTSEICSICOOSE'lung EnglnESTing FTTES

OF'I

CUENT smM DF


R5A Sfrucluf41 Muchnnicnl

Cnnrulrinp Knpinnnrinp firm

6 4

3(

LCUENT C S ~ SHEEi. ~pP~


Q A st<ucNs ~ I Mechanicalconevaino Ksqineoano arm

CUENT


H h Suuct~ral Mechanicalcossunisy Esglaoeany fnm

S 8 C- OGQ

CUENT JOE HF C SHEET $ OF~Stevenson and Associates

l3 ii, SIT S IiurshMSSha OiC*lConSVIITOTI KngiOSSriOTI fTTTTI

43

IF

cuEwr

SUBJECT


/

55A Suuc<u< ~ I Mechonlgal

conovning engineering l'atm

PS

g l

k

PROCEDURE USED TO ADDRESSTHE OUTLIER GENERATED BY

LAR8005

1. Introduction and Summary

The prying-action detail documented in Plant Area Summary Sheet RACE103 and analyzed in LimitedAnalytical Review LAR005 resulted in an outlier. Per the Outlier Seismic Verification Sheet, therecommended resolution to this outlier is to walk-down the plant and document.all occurrences of thisdetail, screen the specific configuration of each detail using an acceptance criteria based on the LARrequirements, and modify those occurrences that do not meet the criteria. This document addresses thefirst part of this resolution - the walkdown and screening. The screening criteria is described in Section 2,the screening walkdown documentation is contained in Section 3.

This walkdown was performed by the Seismic Review Team members that did the bulk of the originalraceway walkdown: I. C. Huang (AEPSC) and Stephen Anagnostis (SEA). The walkdown included all theareas of the plant covered in the raceway walkdown except for the Unit 1 containment above El 650 andinside the crane wall below El 650, as the unit was operating (the Unit 1 containment annulus wasincluded). Based on the original raceway walkdown and that this walkdown of the Unit 2 containment didnot find any significant occurrences of the prying-action detail, the SRT concluded that the Unit 1

containment does not contain any significant occurrences of the prying-action detail.

The results of this walkdown is summarized in Table 1. The first column contains the walkdownworksheet number (the worksheets are in Section 3), the second column describes the location of thehangers with the prying-action detail, and the third column states whether the hangers passed or failed thescreening criteria. About 50 hangers with the prying-action detail were found (note. that some worksheetscover more than one hanger). Twelve of those hangers failed the screening criteria. Allof the hangersthat failed are located in one area of the plant - the Unit 1 Vestibule and the adjacent section of the Unit 1

Reactor Cable Tunnel.

Table 1. Summary of the Prying Action Detail screening walkdown.

Worksheet ff1-092694-1

1-092694-2

1-092694-3

1-092694K

1-092694-5

1-092694-6

1-092694-7

1-092694-8

2-092794-1

2-092794-2

Hanger LocationAux1, El 596, RCT Quad 3 NorthHangers 9, 10, 11 along the right wall counting from door 1-DR-AUX323.Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4Hangers 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 on the left wall counting from door 1-DR-AUX329.Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4Directly across the hall from penetration 1-CEP-4P5Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4Adjacent to penetration 1-CEP-4P5Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1

Two hangers across the hallway from penetration 1-CEP-1PGOne hanger near MCC 1-CT-BNAux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1

Upper platform, 1st hanger on right facing door 1-DR-AUX467Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1

Upper platform, first 3 hangers on left facing door 1-DR-AUX467Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1

Upper platform, first hanger on right off the edge of the platform.Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 3 SouthNear 2-VRS-2200 (Upper Cntmt RMS "B" Data Acq Module)Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 1

Upper platform, two hangers about 3 hangers away from Door 2-OR-AUX468.

Pass/Fail,Pass

Pass

Fail (1J

P3ass

Pass

Pass (2)

Pass [3]

Fail

Pass

Pass

Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown

page 1

1-092794-3

1-092794-4

1-092794-5

2-092894-1

2-092894-2

1-092894-3

2-092894-4

2-092894-5

1-0928944

1-092894-?

1-092894-8

1-092894-9

1-092894-1 0

1-092894-11

2-092894-12

2-092894-13

2-092994-1

Aux1, El 609, 4kV AreaAbove 600V Bus IIAAux1, El 609, Transformer RoomOne hanger above 1-DGTAB and one hanger at the right side of theentrance.Aux1, AuxiliaryCable Vault15'outh of the hatchAux2, EI 5736'outh of gate 2-GT-AUX1013 (U2 Rx Coolant Drain Pump Room)Aux2, El 573South end of the hallway common to both unitsAux1, El 609, elevated area adjacent to the control room cable vaultAbove 12HV-ACA-FLT-3Aux2, El 609Near Miscellaneous Rack 2-H-HAux2, El 609Above cabinet 2-BITH2Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCTNext to 1-DR-AUX467

'ux1,El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT3rd hanger on left from the edge of the platformAux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT4th hanger on left from the edge of the platformAux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT2nd hanger on right from the edge of the platformAux1

~El 612, Vestibule

4 hangers along the containment wall just before the upper platformleading to the RCT.Aux1, El 612, VestibuleThe hanger above the west end of 1-HE-22 and the next hanger west.The two or three hangers south of these running along the block wall.Aux2, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT4th hanger on right from the edge of the platformAux2, El 633Hangers between the Containment Auxiliaries Panel and 2-MSI-1.Cont2, El 598, AnnulusSeveral hangers near Column 1, Az 63, Quad 1

Pass

Pass

Pass [4]

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass [5]

Pass

Pass

Fail [6]

Fail

Fait [73

Pass

Pass

Pass

[1] The angle is "clipped" to the embedded channel with the edge of a washer bolted into the embeddedchannel. Repair by drilling a hole through the angle and rebolting.

[2] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the tw'o

adjacent supports is <= 10', so GIP requirements would be met even if this support was removed. Notethat the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 8'5'n one side and 3'n the other) and aload per rod of 640ft.. This load satisfies the allowables of 20000 for DL and 2500Ã for 3DL as specified inthe LAR calculation.

[3] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria for 3DL, but was judged acceptable as the r/c wall on oneside and a large pipe, and platform steel and handrail on the other side will prevent any significant lateralmotion.

'Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103

Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdownpage 2

[4] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the twoadjacent supports is <= 10', so GIP requirements would be met even if this support was removed. Notethat the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 7'4.5'n one side and 3.5'n the other)and a load per rod of 440% This load satisfies the allowables of 2000@ for DL and 2500@ for 3DL asspecified in the LAR calculation.

[5] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the twoadjacent supports is 9'<= 10'), so GIP requirements would be met even if this. support was removed.Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 7.5'4.5'n. one side and 3'n theother) and a load per rod of 600iti. This toad satisfies the allowables of 2000'or DL and 2500ft for 3DL asspecified in the LAR calculation. I

[6] Both rods on this hanger do not meet the screening criteria (this hanger was the subject of LAR iIi'5,

which initiated this effort).

[7}The two hangers above 1-HE-22 probably need both rod anchorages to be modilied - these twohangers are on either side of a removable concrete hatch. The rods furthest from the corners of the hatchwere clearly visible (and do not meet the criteria), the rods nearest the corner were not easily visible butlook like they willalso require modification.

I

The rods immediately adjacent to the block wall of two or three hangers running along the block wall werenot clearly visible, but do not look like they will meet the screening criteria.

iAttachment to the OSVS for RACE103

Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdownpage 3

2. Screening Criteria

2.1 Criteria DevelopmentThis criteria is for evaluating the D. C. Cook cable tray hanger anchorage detail shown belowfor seismic adequacy in accordance with GIP procedures (Ref. 1).

Lg

v vpv'vP

V

I/2 OR 5/8UNISTRUT NUT AND BOLTIN EMBEDDED UNISTRUT

L2x2x1/4 or L3x3xl/4

'c

= Bearing force on concreteFR = Te'nsile load in threaded rodFa = Tensile load on Unistrut bolt

Force in Unistrut bolt: Fa = FR(1 + Lg/Lq) => FR = Fa/(1+ Lg/L1)

Maximum moment in angle: MMAx= FRL2 FR™MAx/L2

In this detail, bending stresses in the angle and pullout force on the Unistrut bolt will each limitthe capacity of the anchorage. The equations above show that the bending moment in theangle is related to L2, while the force in the Unistrut bolt is related to the ratio of L2 to L<. As theratio L2/L< increases, the lever action on the Unistrut bolt increases for a given rod load FR.

r li 'I

The anchorage detail above is used on rod-hung trapeze hangers. For trapeze-type supports,which may swing laterally during an earthquake, the GIP requires both a Dead Load Check anda Vertical Capacity Check (3 x DL) of the anchorage. The vertical capacity check ensures thatthere is extra design margin in the anchorage to account for additional loads due to supportdisplacement.

This detail is also used on wall-mounted brackets to provide vertical support at the cantileveredend. These supports are directly attached to building structure and are not free to move duringan earthquake. Per GIP procedures, only a Dead Load Check is necessary for these supports.


page 4

Allowa I n b ndi s ess

Bending stresses in angles are calculated in accordance with the AISC specification for single-angle members, Ref. 2. Per Section 5.2.1b of the specification, the calculated bending stress,fa, is:

fa= 1.25M/S = 1.25FnLz/S

where S is the geometric section modulus of the angle section.

For the Dead Load Check, the working stress allowables given in Ref. 2 are used. Per Sections5.1 and 5.2 of Ref. 2, the allowable bending stress is 0.66 Fq for 2x2x1/4 L's, and 0.6 Fq for3x3x1/4 L's. For the 3 x DL Check, an allowable bending stress of 0.9FY is used for both anglesections. The bending stress, fa, and the stress limits are summarized as follows:

1.25FnLz/(0.247)1.25FqLz/(0.577)1.25FnLz/(0.247)1.25FnLz/(0.577)

5 0.66Fy5 0.60Fy5 0.90Fy6 0.90Fy

for L2x2x1/4, DL Casefor L3x3x1/4, DL Casefor L2x2x1/4, 3DL Casefor L3x3x1/4, 3DL Case

liow le nis b llo I d

Allowable pullout loads for the Unistrut bolt are summarized below (see Ref 3 for discussion):

1/2" bolt5/8" bolt1/2" bolt5/8" bolt

2000 Ib,2000 Ib,2000 Ib,2500 Ib,

DL CaseDL Case

.3DL Case3DL Case

Limits for Lz and Lz/L< for a given Fz are listed below for all combinations of angle size, Unistrutbolt size, and load case.

DL case, bending in L2x2x1/4:1 25F+Lz/S 6 0 66Fy Lz 5 0 66 (36 000)(0 247)/(1 25Fn) > Lz 5 4690/Fn

DL case, bending in L3x3x1/4:1.25FnLz/S S 0.60Fy => Lz 6 0.60 (36,000)(0.577)/(1.25Fn) => Lz 6 9970/Fn

3DL case, bending in L2x2x1/4:3x1.25FpLz/S s 0.9Fy = Lz s 0.90 (36,000)(0.247)/(1.25x3Fn) => Lz s 2130/Fn

3DL case, bending in L3x3x1/4:3x1.25F„L,/S 6 0.9Fy

4990/FnLz 5 0.90 (36,000)(0.577)/(1.25x3Fq) => Lz s

Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Watkdown

page 5

DL case, pullout of 1/2" Unistrut bolt:FR(1+LE/Lq) 5 2000 Ib => L2/Lq 5 (2000/FR)-1

DL case, pullout of 5/8" Unistrut bolt:FR(1+L2/Lq) 52000 Ib => L2/Lq 5(2000/FR)-1

3DL case, pullout of 1/2" Unistrut bolt:3FR(1+LE/Lq) 52000 Ib => LP/Lq 5(667/FR)-1

3DL case, pullout of 5/8" Unistrut bolt:3FR(1+L2/Lg) 52500 Ib => LP/Lq 6(833/FR)-1

The equations above are summarized in table form below.

(LB)

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

LOAD CASEDL 3DL

L2 (IN., MAX) L2/Lg(MAX) L2 (IN., MAX) Lp(L/(MAX)

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

4690/ FR

4690/ FR

9970/ FR

9970/ FR

(2000/FR) 1

I (2000/FR) 1

lI (2000/FR)-1

'(2000/FR)-'I

2130/ FR

2130/ FR

4990/ FR

4990/ FR

( (667/FR)-1

I (833/FR) 1

l, (667/FR)-1

'833/FR)-1

2.2 References

1. Generic Implementation Plan Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear PlantEquipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification UtilityGroup.

2. "Specification for Allowable Stress Design of Single-Angle Members," from Section 5 ofthe AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, Ninth Edition, AmericanInstitute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago, IL, 1989.

3. LAR criteria document


page 6

2.3 Screening Charts

Screening charts for F„ in increments of 25 lb up to 800 lb. appear on the following pages.

SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR < '|00 LB

LOAD CASE

Fn

(LB)

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

DL

L2/L)(MAX)L2 (IN., MAX)

3DL

L2 (IN., MAX) L2/L)(MAX)

100

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

'2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

6/8"

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

1/Z'/8"

1/2"

5/8"

1 /2 II

5/8"

188

188

399

399

93.8

93.8

199

199

62.5

62.5

133

133

46.9

46.9

, 99.799.7

79.0

79.0

79.0

79.0

39.0

39.0

39.0

39.0

25.7

25.7

25.7

25.7

19.0

19.0

19.0

19.0

I85.2'25.785.2 I 32.3

II

I

200 I 25.7

200 I 32.3II

I42.6'12.3426 I 157

II

I

998 I 123998

I16,7

II

I

28,4 I 7,9

28.4 I 10.1III

66.5I 7.9

665 I 101II

I

21.3 I 5.7

213 t 73II

I

499I

5749.9 I 7.3

II


page 7

SCREENING CHART FOR FR < 200 LB

LOAD CASE

Fr(

(LB)

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

DL ~ ~

Lg/Li(MAxlL2 (IN., MAX)

3DL

L2(L)(MAXIL2 (IN., MAXI

125

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

37.5

37.5

79.8

79.8

15.0

15.0

15.0

15.0

17.0

17.0

39.9

39.9

4.3

5.7

4.35.7

150

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

'1.331.3

66.5

66.5

12.3

12.3

12.3

12.3

14.2

14.2

33.3

33.3

344.6

344.6

175

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"'/8"

1/2"

5I8"

26.826.8

57.0

57.0

10410.4

10.4

10.4

12.2

12.2

28.5

28.5

2.8

3.8

2.8

3.8

200

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

23.5

23.5

49.949.9

9.0

9.0

9.0

9.0

10.7

10.7

25.025.0

2.3

3.2

2.3

3.2


page 8


LOAD CASE

Fn

(LB)

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

DL

L2/LIlMAX)L2 tlN., MAX)

3DL

L2/LIlMAX)L2 lIN.. MAX)

225

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

20.8

20.8

44.344.3

7.9

7.9

7.9

7.9

9.5

9.5

22.2

22.2

2.0

2.7

2.0

2.7

250

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

18.8

18.8

39.9

39.9

7.0

7.0

7.07.0

8.5

8.5

20.0

20.0

1.7

2.3

1.7

2.3

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8

1/2"

5/8"

17.1 II

17.1I

II

36.3

36.3II

6.36.3

6.3

6.3

?.7

7.7

18.1

18.1

1.4

2.0

1.4

2.0

300

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

15.6

15.6

33.2

33.2

I

5.7

5.7II,I

5.7

5.7II

7.1

7.1

16.6

16.6

1.2

1.8

1.2

1.8


page 9

SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR < 400 LB

LOAD CASE

Fr(

(LBj

ANGLE UNISTRUTSIZE BOLT SIZE

DL ~ ~

L2/Lt(MAX}Lp (IN., MAX}

3DL

L2/L)(MAX)Lp (IN., MAXl

325

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

14.4

14.4

30.7

30.7

5.2

5.2

5.2

, 5.2

6.6-6.6

15.4

15.4

1.1

1.6

1.1

1.6

350

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

13.4

13A

28.5

28.5

IIIIIIIIIII

III

4.74.7

4.74.7

6.1

6.1

14.3

14.3

0.9

1.4

0.9

1.4

375

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

12.5

12.5

26.626.6

4.3

4.3

4.34.3

5.7

5.7

13.3

13.3

0.8

1.2

0.81.2

400

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

11.7

11.7

24.9

24.9

4.0

4.0

4.04.0

5.3

5.3

12.5

12.5

0.7

1.1

0.7

1.1

Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Wa}kdown

page 10


LOAD CASE

Fn

(LBI

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

DL

L2/L>(MAxlL2 (IN., MAXl

3DLL,iL,(MAxlL2 (IN., MAX)

425

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

11.0

11.0

23.5

23.5

3.7

3.7

3.7

3.7

5.0

5.0

11.7

11.7

0.6

0.6

1.0

450

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

10.4- 10.4,

22.222.2

3434

343.4

4.74.7

11.1

11.1

0.5

0.9

0.5

0.9

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

9.9

9.9

21.021.0

3.2

3.2

3.2

3.2

4.5

4.5

10.5

10.5

0.4

0.8

0.4

0.8

500

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

9.4

9.4

19.9

19.9

3.0

3.0

3.0

3.0

4.3

4.3

10.0

10.0

0.3

0.7

0.3

0.7

I Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown

page 11

SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR < 600 LB

LOAD CASE

Fn

(LB)

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

DL

L2/L)lMAX)L2 llN., MAX)

3DL

L2/L1 lMAX)L2 llN., MAX)

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

8.9

8.9

19.0

19.0

2.8

2.8

2.8

2.8

4.1

4.1

9.5

9.5

0.3

0.6

0.3

0.6

550

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

8.5

8.5

18.1

18.1

2.6

2.6

2.6

2.6

3.93.9

9.1

9.1

0.2

0.5

0.2

0.5

575

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

8.2

8.2

17.3

17.3

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

3.7

3.7

8.7

8.7

0.2

0.4

0.2

0.4

600

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

7.8

7.8

16.6

16.6

2.3

2.3

2.3

2.3

3.6

3.6

8.3

8.3

0.1

0.4

0.1

0.4

Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Wa)kdown

page 12

$ CREENING CHART FOR FR < 700 LB

LOAD CASE

Fn

(LB)

ANGLESIZE

UNISTRUTBOLT SIZE

DL

I 2/L) lMAX)L2 IIN., MAX)

3DL

L2/L)lMAX)L2 (IN., MAX)

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

7.5

7.5

16.0

16.0

2.2

2.2

2.2

2.2

3.4

3.4

8.0

8.0

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.3

650

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

7.2

7.2

15.3

15.3

2.1

2.1

2.1

2.1

3.3

3.3

7.7

7.7

0.0

0.3

0.0

0.3

675

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5I8"

1/2"

5/8"

6.9

6.9

14.8

14.8

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

3.2

3;2

7.4

7.4

-0.0

0.2

-0.0

0.2

700

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

6.7

6.7

14.2

14.2

1.9

1.9

1.9

1.9

3.0

3.0

7.1

7.1

-0.0

0.2 .

-0.0

0.2

Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Watkdown

page 13


LOAD CASE

Fn

LB)

ANGLE UNISTRUTSIZE BOLT SIZE

DL ~ ~

Lp(L){MAX)Lp {IN., MAX)

30LL2 {IN., MAXI L2/L]{MAX)

3x3x1/4

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

6.5

13.8

13.8

1.8

1.8

1.8

2.9

6.96.9

0.1

N/A

0.1

750

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

6.36.3

13.3

13.3

1.7

1.7

't.7

1.7

2.8

2.8

6.76.7

N/A

0.1

N/A0.1

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

6.1

6.1

12.912.9

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

2.7

2.7

6.46.4

N/A

0.0

N/A

0.0

800

2x2x1/4

3x3x1/4

1/2"

5/8"

1/2"

5/8"

5.9

5.9

12.5

12.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

2.?

2.7

6.26.2

N/A

0.0

N/A

0.0


page 14

2.4 Anchora e Evaluation Works eet

r,vVV VVV

Vt

Fo

LI

VVVVV~ ~

Hanger Identification and Location:

I/2 DR 5/dVRIvvIRVI IIVI AND DDL'IVI CIIOCDDLD VIIISIRVl

L2v2vl/I VI L2I2II/O

Span: Estimated load on threaded rod, FR.

FSTIMATED CABLE TRAYAND CONDUITWEIGHTS, PLF

Calculations:

ITEM PLFCABLE TRAYS 251/2 CONDUIT 1.1

3/4 CONDUIT 1.31" CONDUIT 2.01.5" CONDUIT 3.52 CONDUIT 4.93 CONDUIT 11.1

4 CONDUIT 16.6

FIELD DATA:

Angle size:

Lengths: L1

Unistrut Bolt Size:

L2/L1

LIMITINGVALUES FROM SCREENING CHART FOR FR= LB:

DL CASE 3 X DL CASE (IF APPLICABLE)*

Max L

Actual L

Max L2/L1

Actual L>/L1

Max L

Actual L

Max L>/L1

Actual L>/L1

PASS:YES NO

PASS:YES NO

PASS:YES NO

PASS:YES NO

*3xDLcase N/A for wall mounted brackets.

Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103

Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown1 page 15

I 3. Screening Walkdown Worksheets

Hanger LocationWorksheot ¹1-092694-1

1-092694-2

1-092694-3

1-0926944

1-092694-5

1-092694-6

1-092694-7

1-092694-8

2492794-1

2492794-2

1-092794-3

1-092794<

1-092794-5

2-092894-1

2-092894-2

1-092894-3

24)92894M

2-092894-5

1-0928944

1-092894-7

1%92894%

1492894-9

1-092894-10

1-092894-11

2-092894-12

2-092894-13

2-092994-1

Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 3 NorthHangers 9, 10, 11 along the right wall counting from door 1-OR-AUX323.Aux1 ~ EI 596, RCT Quad 4Hangers 5. 6, 7, 8, 9 on the left wall counting from 'd'oor 1-DR-AUX329.Aux1 ~ El 596. RCT Quad 4Directly across the hall from penetration 1-CEPAP5Aux1 ~ El 596, RCT Quad 4Adjacent to penetration 1-CEP-4P5.Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1

Two hangers across the hallway from penetration 1-CEP-1P5One hanger near MCC 1-CT-BNAux1 ~ El 596. RCT Quad IUpper platform, 1st hanger on right facing door 1-OR-AUX467Aux1 ~ El 596, RCT Quad IUpper platform, first 3 hangers on loft facing door 1-OR-AUX467Aux1 ~ EI 596, RCT Quad 1

Upper platform, first hanger on right off the edge of the platform.Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 3 SouthNear 2-VRS-2200 tUpper Cntmt RMS "B" Data Acq Module)Aux2, EI 596, RCTQuad 1

Upper platform, two hangers about 3 hangers away from Door 2-DR-AUX468.Aux1, El 609, 4kV AreaAbove 600V Bus IIAAux1 ~ El 609, Transformer RoomOne hanger above 1-DGTAB and one hanger at the right side of the entrance.Aux1 ~ Auxiliary Cable Vault15'outh of the hatchAux2, EI 5736'outh of gate 2-GT-AUX1013 (U2 Rx Coolant Drain Pump Room)Aux2. EI 573South end of the hallway common to both units.Aux1, El 609, elevated area adjacent to the control room cable vaultAbove 12HV-ACA.FLT-3Aux2, El 609Near Miscellaneous Rack 2-H.HAux2, EI.609Above cabinet 2-BITH2Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform loading to RCTNext to 1-DR-AUX467Aux1. EI 612, Vestibule. upper platform leading to RCT3rd hanger on left from the edge of the platformAux1 ~ El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT4th hanger on left from the edge of the platformAux1 ~ El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT2nd hanger on right from the edge of the platformAux1. EI 612, Vestibule4 hangers along the containment wall just before the upper platform leading tothe RCT.Aux1 ~ El 612, VestibuleThe hanger above the west end of 1-HE-22 and the next hanger west.The two or three hangers south of these running along the block wall.Aux2, EI 612, Vestibule. upper plalform leading to RCT4th hanger on right from the edge of the platformAux2, EI 633Hangers between the Containment Auxiliaries Panel and 2-MSI-1.Cont2, El 598, AnnulusSeveral hangers near Column 1. Az 63, Quad 1


page 16

ML17334B615.pdf - Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Documents

Transcript of ML17334B615.pdf - Nuclear Regulatory Commission