Post on 12-Mar-2023
^J- CO
I 1 T- o
I
p -J on Hi O o Q UL m
m c
J?1S C L.
LU O
O _j ■**
o JC 3 O Li. !■■ ** CS (A ö C (/) O 0) o a:
>n ,i"i Dß'^D |
.."."A'.'1!' I
US Army Corps of Engineers® Engineer Research and Development Center
Environmental Compliance Assessment Data: Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's EGAS Program Donna J. Schell March 2001
20010423 081 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Foreword
This study was conducted for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers un-
der project 622720A896, "Base Facilities Environmental Quality," Work Unit
T20, "Compliance Data." The technical reviewer was Gary W. Schanche, Con-
struction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL).
The research was performed by CERL's Installation Division (CN), Environ-
mental Processes Branch (CN-E). The Principal Investigator was Donna J.
Schell (CN-E). The technical editor was Linda L. Wheatley, Information Tech-
nology Laboratory. Dr. Ilker Adiguzel is Branch Chief (CN-E) and Dr. John T.
Bandy is Division Chief (CN). Gary W. Schanche is the associated Technical Di-
rector. William D. Goran is Acting Director of CERL.
CERL is an element of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Cen-
ter (ERDC), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Director of ERDC is Dr. James
R. Houston and the Commander is COL James S. Weiler.
DISCLAIMER
The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. All product names and trademarks cited are the property of their respective owners.
The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.
DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED. DO NOT RETURN IT TO THE ORIGINATOR.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Contents
Foreword 2
1 Introduction 7
Background 7
Objectives 7
Approach 7
2 Environmental Compliance Assessment System 10
Active Army 10
Army Reserve 10
Army National Guard 11
3 Summary of Findings and Recommendations 12
Trends Analysis 12
Top 20 Findings of Noncompliance Across All Fiscal Years 12
Trends by Topic and Fiscal Year 76
Trends Across Topics 25
Numeric Analysis of Findings 25
Numbers of Findings 25
Positive Findings 26
Accuracy of Findings 26
Citations of Negative Findings 27
Pollution Prevention Solutions 28
No or Inadequate Characterization of Wastes (HW. 10.1) 28
Noncompliance With State and Local Wastewater Regulations (WA.3.1) 29
Noncompliance With State and Local Air Emissions Regulations (AE.3.1) 31
Noncompliance With State and Local Drinking Water/Water Quality Regulations (WQ.3.1) 31
Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Hazardous Materials (OSHA- based regulations pertaining to issues such as personal protection equipment [PPE] and eyewashes) (HM.2.1) 31
Noncompliance With State and L oca! Solid Waste Regulations (SO. 3.1) 31
Hazardous Waste Satellite Accumulation Point/Accumulation Point Limits Exceeded (HW.75.1) 32
Discharge of Oil Into or Upon Navigable Waters (PO. 15.1) 32
Inadequate or No Spill Containment and Cleanup Materials in POL Storage Areas (PO.20.1) 33
Noncompliance With State and Local Hazardous Waste Regulations (HW. 3.1) 33
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Water Quality (WQ.2.1) 33
Noncompliance With State and Local Storage Tank Regulations (ST.3.1) 33
Noncompliance With or Lack of State/Federal NPDES for Point Source Discharges (WA.10.1) 33
Discharges That Would Cause Pass Through or Interference at the POTW/ FOTW (WA.25.1) 33
Improper Storage of Compressed Gas Cylinders (HM.45.1) 33
Lack of "Used Oil" Label on ASTs (ST. 125.1) 33
Lack of or Incomplete MSDSs (HM.1.2) 34
Inadequate Management and Organization of Paperwork (05.1.2.A) 34
Inadequate Fire Protection for Flammable/Combustible Storage Areas (HM.35.9) 34
No or Incomplete Asbestos Survey (T2.1.3. A) 34
Appendix A: Installations/Facilities Included in the Data Analysis 35
Appendix B: Definitions for Fields in ACCESS Database 40
Appendix C: Keyword Index 46
Appendix D: Trends by Legislative Authority 56
Appendix E: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1994-2000 by Topic for the Active Army 59
Appendix F: Top Three Findings in Each Fiscal Year by Topic for the Active Army (FY 1994-2000) 77
Appendix G: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1991-1998 by Topic for the Army Reserve 100
Appendix H: Top Three Findings in Each Fiscal Year by Topic for the Army Reserve (FY 1991-1998) 104
Appendix I: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for Army National Guard 136
Appendix J: Top Three Findings in Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for the Army National Guard 140
Appendix K: Positive and False Positive Findings 145
Appendix L: Positive Versus Negative Findings 146
Appendix M: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Active Army 148
Appendix N: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Army Reserve 160
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix O: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Army National Guard 163
Appendix P: Questionable Findings 165
Appendix Q: Citations of Negative Findings 169
CERL Distribution 171
Report Documentation Page 172
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
1 Introduction
Background
The Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard have been conduct- ing environmental compliance assessments since the late 1980s under the Envi- ronmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS). No analysis of the data gen- erated to date had been done until the project reported here. This report summarizes the methodology used for an analysis of the data and the results of that analysis.
Objectives
The objectives of this effort were to review the available Army environmental compliance assessment data to identify:
• Trends in environmental noncompliance • Whether or not the Army is resolving issues of noncompliance overtime • True problem areas versus perceived problem areas • Potential areas for research focus.
Approach
Step One: The first step was to obtain ECAS data from the Army Reserve, the Active Army, and the Army Guard. See Appendix A for a list of installations and facilities covered by the data. Data for Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98) and a portion of FY99 were not received until July 2000 and therefore had not been comprehen- sively analyzed at the time of this report.
Step Two: When received, the Active Army and Army Reserve data were in DOS format, which had to be converted into a Microsoft™ ACCESS database. See Appendix B for a list of data fields used in the ACCESS database and their defi- nitions.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Problems with the data included:
• Data that are pre-FY95 were developed without using TEAM Guide and
the Active Army Supplement. The checklist item numbers cited in this
data have been translated to the current TEAM Guide and Active Army
Supplement checklist item numbers. If the regulatory requirement no
longer exists, the finding was referred to the XX.2.1 checklist item number
in each TEAM Guide Section.
• Multiple findings. Findings based on Federal/state regulations and Army
Regulations (AR) were stacked together into one finding and marked as a
Class 01 finding. A commonly occurring example is the stacking together of
the findings for a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC)
and an Installation Spill Contingency Plan (ISCP). In cases where it is ob-
vious which checklist items were joined, both checklist item numbers have
been indicated in the field. The class field was then edited to indicate that
two classes were involved.
• Mixed-up findings. Throughout the data are findings written up against
the wrong citation. When the finding description had enough detail, an
appropriate checklist item number was assigned. In some instances, how-
ever, there was not enough data or the data was confusing. An example of
the latter is a reserve center that has hazardous waste findings written up
for it under conditionally exempt small quantity generator (CESQG) check-
list item numbers, small quantity generator (SQG) checklist item numbers,
and treatment storage and disposal facility (TSDF) checklist item numbers.
Data in the finding description was insufficient to tell what type of facility
it really is. The findings in these cases are marked as Questionable.
• Edited checklist items. In some cases the assessors edited the text of the
checklist item to reflect an issue that the checklist item did not truly cover.
These findings are also marked Questionable.
• False positives. These are findings listed as positive for which the finding
description indicates simple compliance, not above and beyond. These find-
ings have been identified as FP.
• Unidentified facilities. The name of the facility assessed is not always in-
cluded in the data received from the Army Reserve. Instead of the facility
name, this field was often filled with the name of the assessment team.
Identifying the majority of the facilities was resolved by searching the Fed-
eral Facilities Identification (FFID) database. After searching the FFID,
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
•
however, facility names still could not be determined for SC2104SC007,
WI2104WI091, and WI2104WI0X1.
Confusion in the MACOM field. Active Army ECAS records have been
identified with the following Major Army Commands (MACOMs) that do
not seem appropriate for Active Army ECAS data: Corps of Engineers
(COE), Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), and Army Na-
tional Guard (ARNG). The COE data were from an assessment done at a
COE research and development (R&D) facility, the Cold Regions Research
and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). The record was deleted. The
ARNG data were from a tenant facility and were removed from being
marked as an Active Army ECAS record.
• Root cause lists. The Army Reserve and the Active Army use the same root
cause codes, when they are used, but the Army National Guard uses a dif-
ferent list. Due to the inconsistency with which set of root cause codes was
used, and the inconsistency of whether any codes were used at all, it was
not possible to do a root cause analysis.
Step 3: All the data were indexed with appropriate keywords (see Appendix C) so that they are searchable by concepts.
Step 4: The data were reviewed by subject experts to identify existing or poten- tial solutions to repeated problems.
Step 5: New data are incorporated as they are generated.
10 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
2 Environmental Compliance Assessment System
To effectively review the ECAS data, it was necessary to first understand the ex-
isting processes and the variations across MACOMs. Some processes and proce-
dures are common to all three branches of the program, but there are variations
as well.
Active Army
The Active Army ECAS program encompasses all MACOMs except the Army Re-
serve and the Army National Guard. The program is administered by the U.S.
Army Environmental Center (AEC) but implemented by the individual
MACOMs.
Currently, the Active Army uses a DOS-based software to record its findings of
noncompliance. Typically, assessors perform site visits, write findings, and the
findings are reviewed by the installation.
The Active Army rates its findings by whether they are Class 1 (regulatory re-
quirement), Class 2 (future regulatory requirement), Class 3 (Army/Department
of Defense [DOD] requirement or management practice), or Health and Safety
(based on Office of Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] regulations).
Army Reserve
The Army Reserve ECAS program is administered by HQ U.S. Army Reserve
Command (USARC), but implemented by the 416th Engineering Command.
As with the Active Army, the Army Reserve uses a DOS-based software to record
its findings of noncompliance. Typically, assessors perform site visits, write find-
ings, and the findings are reviewed by the installation.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 ^
The Army Reserve rates its findings by whether they are Class 1 (regulatory re- quirement), Class 2 (future regulatory requirement), Class 3 (Army/DOD re- quirement or management practice), or Health and Safety (based on OSHA regu- lations).
Army National Guard
The Army National Guard ECAS program is administered by ARNG- National Guard Bureau (NGB) and executed by one of three contractors selected by ARNG-NGB.
The Army National Guard uses software called WINCASS to record its findings of noncompliance. WINCASS is built in Power Builder. Typically, assessors per- form site visits, write findings, a stringent quality assurance (QA) check is done by ARNG-NGB as well as a designated individual on the contract team, and all reviewed by the installation.
For the purposes of ECAS, the ARNG-NGB defines an installation as being all the facilities within a state.
The ARNG rates its findings by whether they are Class 1 (regulatory require- ment), Class 2 (future regulatory requirement), Class 3 (Army/DOD requirement or management practice), and Health and Safety (based on OSHA regulations). Unlike the Reserve and the Active Army, however, it also assigns a measure of threat (Significant, Major, Minor).
12 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
3 Summary of Findings and Recommendations
Trends Analysis
The purpose of trends analysis is to identify recurring noncompliance issues. While there is similarity across the entire Army, the nature of facilities and mis- sion also impact what noncompliance is found.
Top 20 Findings of Noncompliance Across All Fiscal Years
The first form of trends analysis done was to identify the most common noncom- pliance findings across all FYs in each of the three ECAS branches. The Class of the finding is indicated in italics.
• Active Army Top 20 Findings 1. No or inadequate characterization of wastes (Federal regulation; see
checklist item HW.10.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1 2. Noncompliance with state and local waste water regulations (state regu-
lations written under WA.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1 - 53 percent were related to NPDES issues - 34 percent were related to stormwater - 18 percent were related to point source discharges - 15 percent were related to washracks - 12 percent were related to treatment works - 5 percent were related to monitoring - 5 percent were related to vehicle maintenance - 2 percent were related to plans
3. Noncompliance with state and local air emissions regulations (state regulations written under AE.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropri- ate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1 - 39 percent were related to permits - 13 percent related to painting activities - 11 percent related to degreasers - 9 percent related to plans
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 13
- 7 percent related to particulates
- 6 percent related to open burning
4. Noncompliance with state and local drinking water/water quality regu-
lations (state regulations written under WQ.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see
the appropriate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1
- 21 percent related to monitoring
- 14 percent related to backflow prevention
- 14 percent related to design criteria
- 12 percent related to wells
- 12 percent related to recordkeeping
- 4 percent related to reporting
5. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding hazardous
materials (HM.2.1) Primarily Health and Safety (OSHA)
6. Noncompliance with state and local solid waste regulations (state regu-
lations written under SO.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate
state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1
- 30 percent related to landfills
- 15 percent related to dumpsters
- 11 percent related to medical waste
- 8 percent related to construction/demolition waste
- 7 percent related to tires
- 7 percent related to plans
7. Hazardous waste satellite accumulation point/accumulation point limits
exceeded (Federal regulation; see checklist item HW.75.1 in the U.S.
TEAM Guide) Class 1
8. Discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters (Federal regulation, see
checklist item PO.15.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1
9. Inadequate or no spill containment and cleanup materials in petroleum,
oil, and lubricants (POL) storage areas (Federal regulation; see checklist
item PO.20.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1
10. Noncompliance with state and local hazardous waste regulations (state
regulations written under HW.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropri-
ate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1
- 36 percent are related to the storage facilities
- 25 percent are related to labeling
- 23 percent are related to container management
- 13 percent are related to uncharacterized waste
- 6 percent are related to inspections
11. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding water quality
(WQ.2.1) Class 1
12. Noncompliance with state and local storage tank regulations (state
regulations written under ST.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate
™ . ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1 and Class 2, but
since the underground storage tank (UST) deadline has passed, what
was a Class 2 would now be a Class 1.
- 48 percent were related to USTs
- 26 percent were related to aboveground storage tanks (ASTs)
- 26 percent it was impossible to tell if the issue was an AST, a UST, or both
- 13 percent were related to release detection
- 12 percent were related to inspections
- 11 percent were related to containment
- 8 percent were related to recordkeeping
13. Noncompliance with or lack of state/Federal NPDES for point source
discharges (Federal regulation, see checklist item WA.10.1 in the U.S.
TEAM Guide) Class 1
14. Discharges that would cause pass through or interference at the pub-
licly-owned/federally-owned treatment works (POTW/FOTW) (Federal
regulation; see checklist item WA.25.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1
15. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (Federal regulation; see
checklist item HM.45.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Health and Safety (OSHA)
16. Lack of "used oil" label on ASTs (Federal regulation; see checklist item
ST. 125.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1
17. Lack of or incomplete Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) (Federal
regulation; see checklist item HM.1.2 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Health
and Safety (OSHA)
18. Inadequate management and organization of paperwork (Management
Practice finding; see checklist item 05.1.2.A in the Active Army Sup-
plement) Class 3
19. Inadequate fire protection for flammable/combustible storage areas
(Federal regulations; see checklist item HM.35.9 in U.S. TEAM Guide)
Health and Safety (OSHA)
20. No or incomplete asbestos survey (AR 200-1 requirement; see checklist
T2.1.3.A in the Active Army Supplement) Class 3
• Army Reserve Top 20
1. No or incomplete MSDSs Health and Safety (OSHA)
2. Incomplete radon measurements Class 3
3. No or inadequate asbestos survey Class 3
4. No or inadequate inventory of hazardous waste Class 3
5. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding hazardous
materials Class 1
6. No or inadequate Incompatible Use Zone (ICUZ) study Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 15
7. No or inadequate surveillance of stormwater discharge Class 1 8. No or inadequate coordination with the fire department Class 3 9. No or inadequate written hazardous waste management plan Class 3 10. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous substances Class 3 11. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management Plan Class 3 12. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding air emissions
Class 1
13. Inadequate fire protection for flammable/combustible storage areas Health and Safety (OSHA)
14. No or incomplete file of environmental regulations Class 3 15. Inadequate flammable/combustible storage rooms inside of buildings
Health and Safety (OSHA) 16. No copy ofSPCC Class 1 17. No or inadequate plan for reclaimed, recoverable, and waste liquid pe-
troleum products Class 3
18. No or inadequate storage and handling of flammable/combustible mate- rials Health and Safety (OSHA)
19. Inadequate flammable storage cabinets Health and Safety (OSHA) 20. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials Class 1.
• Army National Guard Top 20 1. No or inadequate characterization of wastes Class 1 2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations Class 1 3. No or inadequate ISCP Class 3 4. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials Class 1 5. No or inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage tanks Class 1 6. Noncompliance with state/local hazardous waste regulations Class 1 7. No "USED OIL" label on containers other than tanks Class 1 8. No copy of SPCC Class 1 9. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (ST.3.1) Class 1 10. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is not integrated into plan-
ning Class 1
11. No or inadequate coordination with the fire department Class 3 12. Inappropriately operating as a hazardous waste CESQG Class 1 13. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW Class 1 14. SPCC plan inadequate Class 1 15. Inadequate ISCP training Class 3 16. Noncompliance with state and local solid waste regulations Class 1 17. Natural resources are not or are inadequately managed to support the
military mission while also protecting and enhancing resources for mul- tiple use, sustainable yield, and biological integrity Class 3
18. Nonparticipation in state/local recycling programs Class 3
16 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
19. No or inadequate SPCC training Class 1
20. Inappropriately operating as a hazardous waste SQG Class 3
Trends by Topic and Fiscal Year
In addition to identifying the top 20 findings across all topic areas and across all
FYs for the Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard, the data have been analyzed for the following:
• classification of findings by legislative source (see Appendix D)
• the top three findings in each topic area, across all FYs, for each MACOM
(see Appendices E, F, and G)
• the top three findings in each topic area, in each FY, for the Active Army,
Army Reserve, and Army National Guard (see Appendices H, I, and J).
When there was a tie for placement, the same ranking number was used and all
tied noncompliance findings were listed.
Some of the inconsistencies between commands can be attributed to differences
in activities, but some of it also has to do with different assessors, which is a flaw
in the process as it was executed during these assessments. A prime example of
an inconsistency between assessors has to do with secondary containment for
ASTs over 660 gal. Some assessors reviewing MACOMs view that regulation as
a suggestion, not a requirement. Other assessors view it as a requirement. How
it was viewed determined whether it was written up or not.
Active Army
When looking at the three most common findings in each topic area by FY across
the Active Army, definite trends can be observed, some of which differ from those
appearing in the top 20 list. Unfortunately, in looking at this information it was
found that in virtually every topic area at least one of the top three noncompli-
ance issues identified in the early years of ECAS still shows up in the top three
in the later years.
In the Active Army these trends are as follows (see Appendix G for a tabular rep-
resentation of this data): (Note that these observations are based on data from
FY94 through FY98).
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 17
• Air Quality: Not surprisingly, the most consistent trend across all FYs is the
number one finding — noncompliance with state/local regulations. This
category encompasses a broad range of issues though. The most commonly
repeated ones across all FYs are: open lids on solvent degreasers, unpermit-
ted sources (construction and/or operating permits), improper incinerator op-
eration, and particulate emissions. A common finding that dropped off the
top three list in FY97 related to the signs on gasoline pumps. While it would
be nice to think that the Army finally achieved compliance with this re-
quirement, the reality is, this requirement was rescinded. See the individual
state supplement to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state requirements. These
are all Class 1 findings.
• Cultural Resources: In every year's data, the lack of or inadequate historic
properties survey is in the top three findings. In FY96 a management prac-
tice finding (Class 3) on inadequate management/organization of paperwork
made it into the top three. In FY94 through FY96 the lack of or inadequate
Installation Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) shows up in the
top 3. It disappears in FY97, but it is questionable as to whether it has dis-
appeared because required installations have an ICRMP and all the ICRMP
are adequate, or if the finding is no longer being written because this re-
quirement is interpreted as having a future compliance date. In more recent
years, findings concerning inadequate curation of long-term collections are
increasing. The survey finding and the long-term management of collections
are based on Federal regulations, 36 CFR 60.9; see checklist item CR.5.1. in
U.S. TEAM Guide. The ICRMP finding is based on requirements in AR 200-4
and DoD Instruction (DODI) 4715.3 (see checklist item CR.1.6.Ain the Active
Army Supplement). The survey and collection management are Class 1 find-
ings, and under the revised DOD definitions of Classes, the ICRMP is also a Class 1.
• Hazardous Materials Management: Contrary to expectations, improper
labeling of containers is not an issue that consistently shows up in the top
three, but inadequate management of compressed gas cylinders is an issue,
placing in the top three from FY95 through FY98. Findings written under
the heading "noncompliance with other Federal regulations" also consistently
places in the top 3. These findings were primarily related to PPE and eye-
wash issues. The compressed gas finding is based on Federal regulations, 29
CFR 1910.101; see checklist item HM.45.1 U.S. TEAM Guide. In FY99 and
FY00 a sudden drop off in the numbers of hazardous materials findings was
observed. This drop off is due to the following decision in December 1998:
18 ___ ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Under the ECAS program, only a limited number of OSHA regulations
will be reviewed. In the TEAM Guide, the checklist items with OSHA ci-
tations (Title 29) that will be assessed are found in PM.45.2 (Pesticides).
P0.45 (Service Stations), and SO. 110 (Medical Waste).
OSHA and OSHA-related issues that will not be addressed in the ECAS
program include: eyewashes, fire extinguishers, HAZCOM, MSDSs (i.e.,
in relation to HAZCOM), Chemical Hygiene Plans, and storage of haz-
ardous materials in containers and tanks (i.e., flammable combustible
liquids, storage of acids, storage of compressed gases). These issues are
currently found in TEAM Guide sections HM.1.2 through HM.1.4,
HxM.10, HM.15, HM.35, HM.40, HM.45, ST.120).
Assessors will not add checklist items based on OSHA, NFPA regula-
tions, Compressed Gas Association Standards, ANSI standards, TB-
MEDs, ARs, DODIs or DODRs to the Hazardous Materials section with-
out submitting the citation for review by AEC for inclusion in the TEAM
Guide or Active Army Supplement.
• Hazardous Waste: The number one finding in every FY is inadequate or lack
of waste stream characterizations. This finding addresses orphan drums/
containers and waste streams being disposed of in the solid waste that need
to be disposed of as hazardous waste (e.g., weapons cleaning rags contami-
nated with trichloroethane (TCE)-containing solvent, paper waste from the
floor of paint booths). The other most persistent finding in hazardous waste
(every FY) relates to the management of satellite accumulation points
(SAPs). These findings mostly related to excess quantities of waste at the
SAP. While the Army seems to be succeeding at managing its 90-day storage
areas, there are still problems with moving the waste from the SAPs to the
90-day areas or a TSDF. And shop personnel are not trained. The charac-
terization finding is based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 261.3, 261.4(b),
261.21 through 261.24, and 262.11; see checklist item HW.10.1 in U.S. TEAM
Guide. The SAP findings are based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 262.34(c);
see checklist item HW.35.1 (for SQGs) and HW.75.1 (for LQGs) in the U.S.
TEAM Guide. These findings are all Class 1.
Although the numbers are not high enough to affect these statistics, there is
an increase in FY99 and FY00 findings on the management of universal
waste. This increase is due to the adoption of the universal waste regula-
tions by the states. Until these Federal regulations were adopted by individ-
ual states, they could not be implemented.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 19
Natural Resources: The most persistent finding is the lack of or inadequate Installation Natural Resource Management Plan (INRMP). In 3 of the 5 years of data, this was the number one finding in Natural Resources. The second most common finding (FY95-97) is no (or inadequate) survey of en- dangered species. The plan finding is based on both Federal and Army re- quirements, Sikes Act, 42 USC 670 et seq (see checklist item NR.1.2 in U.S. TEAM Guide), and Army/DOD requirements (see checklist item NR.1.3.A in the Active Army supplement to TEAM). The survey finding is based on Fed- eral requirements, 50 CFR 402.01(a), 402.10, and 402.12, see checklist item NR.20.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The survey is a Class 1 finding and, under the revised DOD definitions of Classes, the INRMP is also a Class 1.
Other Environmental Issues - NEPA: This category seems to have a success story during FY94-96, NEPA not being integrated into the planning process was consistently in the top three findings. It does not place in the top three at all in FY97 and FY98. Instead, a management practice (MP) finding of in- adequate management and organization of paperwork appears in the top three in FY96 and stays there. So, while the Army seems to be better at in- corporating NEPA into its processes, it is not managing all the ensuing pa- perwork well.
Other Environmental Issues -Noise: Two of the top three findings have been the same every year FY94-97. They are: no or inadequate ICUZ study and no or inadequate noise-complaint procedure. No noise findings were in the data available for FY98. These findings are based on requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3
Other Environmental Issues - Installation Restoration Program (IRP): The only finding that consistently shows up in the top three in this category first placed in FY95. This is the lack of or inadequate removal site evaluation. No IRP findings were found in the data available for FY98. The evaluation find- ings are based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 300.410; see checklist item 03.1.2 in U.S. TEAM Guide. Class 1
Other Environmental Issues - Pollution Prevention (P2): Insufficient data.
Other Environmental Issues - Environmental Management: Due to the fluc- tuation in this section in what is being assessed and what has been assessed, it is difficult to track trends. The most persistent findings across all FYs, however, relate to insufficient funding and staffing, which was closely fol- lowed by internal communication problems. Class 3
20 . ^^ ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Pesticides Management: The finding that shows up most frequently across
multiple FYs (FY94, FY96 - 98) is no or inadequate Installation Pest Man-
agement Plan (IPMP). That is followed by inadequate pesticide storage and
mixing areas. These findings are driven by requirements in AR 420-76, AR
200-5 (replacement for AR 420-76), and DODI 4150.7. Class 3
POL Management: The problem that shows up at the top of the list most fre-
quently (every FY) in this category is the lack of or inadequate spill contain-
ment and cleanup materials. After the problems with appropriate spill con-
tainment/clean up materials, the lack of or inadequate SPCC made the top
three every FY since FY95. The containment and cleanup materials finding
is based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 110.2, 110.3, 110.5, and 110.6; see
checklist item PO.20.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The SPCC findings are
based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 112.1(d) through 112.7; see checklist
items PO.5.1 through PO.5.6 in U.S. TEAM Guide. Class 1
Solid Waste Management: Not surprisingly, the most consistent trend across
all FYs is noncompliance with state and local regulations. This category en-
compasses a broad range of issues though. The most commonly repeated is-
sues across all FYs are: waste tire storage, landfill management, and medi-
cal waste management. The second most persistent finding has to do with
the improper storage of solid waste or recyclables prior to pick up for dis-
posal. This finding usually translates to overflowing dumpsters, open lids on
dumpsters, and recyclables being disposed of as solid waste. This second
finding is based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR 243.200-1; see checklist
item SO. 10.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. See the individual state supplement
to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state requirements. Class 1
Storage Tanks Management: The most prevalent findings from FY94
through FY97 related to UST upgrading. The success story here is the
Army's success in meeting the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's)
December 1998 deadline. The next most common trend (starting in FY95) is
noncompliance with state/local regulations. This category encompasses a
broad range of state-regulated issues. The most commonly repeated state-
regulated issues across all FYs since FY95 are: tanks (ASTs and USTs) not
being registered; inadequate spill and overfill protection; and inadequate sec-
ondary containment for ASTs. See the individual state supplement to U.S.
TEAM Guide for specific state requirements. Class 1 and 2 (USTs until De-
cember 1999).
Toxic Substances - PCBs: The same three issues make the top three in all
FYs. The first is no or inadequate PCB annual document log; second is the
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 21
lack of required markings on PCB equipment; and third is inadequate stor-
age areas for PCB items. No PCB findings were found in the data available
for FY98. The marking finding is based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR
761.40 and 761.45; see checklist item Tl.10.2. in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The
documentation finding is based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR 761.180(a);
see checklist item Tl.15.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The storage finding is
based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR 761.65(a) through 761.65(b)(1), see
checklist item Tl.40.2 in U.S. TEAM Guide. Class 1
Toxic Substances -Asbestos: The same two issues show up in the top three in
each year for which there is data. These issues are the lack of or inadequate
asbestos survey and the lack of or inadequate Asbestos Management Plan.
No asbestos findings were in the data available for FY97. Both of these find-
ings are driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3
Toxic Substances - Radon: The only persistent finding across FYs, and in the
top three every FY, is the lack of or incomplete radon measurements. No ra-
don findings were found in the data available for FY98. This finding is
driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3
Toxic Substances - LBP: The most common trend in this category is the lack
of or inadequate notification of housing occupants as to the lead-based paint (LBP) hazard in their housing. Class 1
Wastewater: The most consistent trend across all FYs and the number one
finding is noncompliance with state and local regulations. This category en-
compasses a broad range of issues. The most commonly repeated state-
regulated issues across all FYs are: unpermitted discharges and violations of
existing permits. The second most persistent findings, across all FYs, is the
discharge of inappropriate materials/waste to the POTW/FOTW. This dis-
charge finding is based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 403.5(a) through
403.5(c); see checklist items WA.25.1 and WA.25.3 in the U.S. TEAM Guide.
See the individual state supplement to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state
requirements. Class 1
Water Quality: The most consistent trend across all FYs and the number one
finding is noncompliance with state and local regulations. This category en-
compasses a broad range of state-regulated issues. The most commonly re-
peated state-regulated issues across all FYs are: no cross connection control
program, improper well closure, and inadequate recordkeeping. See the indi-
vidual state supplement to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state requirements.
Class 1
i? ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Army Reserve
When looking at the three most common findings in each topic area by FY across
the Army Reserve, definite trends can also be observed, some of which differ
from those appearing in the top 20 list. Unfortunately, in looking at this infor-
mation it was found that in virtually every topic area at least one of the top three
noncompliance issues identified in the early years of ECAS still shows up in the
top three in the later years. These are not always the same trends as found in
the Active Army, however, due to the nature and size of Reserve facilities. See
Appendix H for a tabular representation of this data. (Note that these observa-
tions are based on data from FY91 through FY98.)
• Air Quality: Not surprisingly, the most consistent trend across all FYs and
the number one finding is noncompliance with state and local regulations.
This category encompasses a broad range of issues. The most commonly re-
peated ones across all FYs are open lids on solvent degreasers and unpermit-
ted sources (construction and/or operating permits) and improper incinerator
operation. Unlike the Active Army, a persistent finding for the Reserve is the
lack of or inadequate emissions inventory. A finding that has dropped was
the lack of or incomplete quarterly chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) procurement re-
ports. With the revision of AR 200-1, this requirement was removed. The in-
ventory is a Class 3 finding, while noncompliance with state/local regulations is a Class 1 finding.
Cultural Resources: In FY91 through FY96 data, the lack of or inadequate
historic properties survey is in the top three. Additionally findings in every
FY indicate that effects of undertakings on historic properties are not ade-
quately considered. Unlike the Active Army, the ICRMP does not show up as
a persistent issue. Both are Class 1 findings.
Hazardous Materials Management: The top findings trends in this topic area
are completely different than for the Active Army, because the Reserve has a
different perspective on what is and is not to be audited in this topic area.
Findings of noncompliance that occur annually relate to MSDSs, storage of
flammable/combustible liquids, and coordination with the local fire depart-
ment. These findings are all Health and Safety and not Environmental find-
ings.
Hazardous Waste: As with the Active Army, a persistent finding is inade-
quate or lack of waste stream characterization/inventory. This finding ad-
dresses orphan drums/containers; waste streams being disposed of in the
solid waste that need to go as hazardous waste (e.g., weapons cleaning rags
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 23
contaminated with TCE-containing solvent, paper waste from the floor of
paint booths). The other persistent finding for the Army Reserve is the lack
of or inadequate hazardous waste management plan. The characterization
finding is based on Federal regulations and is Class 1; the hazardous waste
management plan is Class 3.
• Natural Resources: Unlike the Active Army, the INRMP is not an issue for
the Army Reserve, because it lacks large tracts of land. They do still need to
perform surveys of threatened and endangered species on the property they
do own. Problems also exist with grounds maintenance at Reserve Centers.
This is probably a result of a lack of personnel dedicated to this type of job.
The survey is a Class 1 finding and inadequate grounds maintenance is a
Class 3 finding.
• Other Environmental Issues ■ NEPA: Findings that NEPA is not being inte-
grated into the planning process are consistently in the top three. This is a
Class 3 finding.
• Other Environmental Issues - Noise: Two of the top three findings have been
the same every year during FY91-97. They are: no or inadequate ICUZ
study and no or inadequate noise complaint procedure. This duplicates the
situation for the Active Army. These findings are based on requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3
• Other Environmental Issues - IRP: The only finding that consistently shows
up in the top three in this category is the lack of or inadequate screening for
the past use of hazardous substances. Class 3
• Other Environmental Issues - P2: The lack of or incomplete master listing of
hazardous substances and/or a P2 Plan are the consistent repeats in this category. Class 3
• Other Environmental Issues - Environmental Management: The only consis-
tent theme in this medium is a lack of environmental training as required by
AR 200-1. Class 3
• Pesticides Management: Unlike the Active Army, there are findings in all
FYs for no or inadequate review of pesticide contracts and pesticide applica-
tors not being DOD-certified. These both are occurring because the usual
practice for a Reserve Center is to contract out pest control operations or to
have a soldier do it who has never been certified. Class 3
24 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
POL Management: The consistent theme in this category is a lack of or in-
adequate plans related to the management of POL (e.g., PSCC Plans. ISCP,
and/or plans for reclaimed, recoverable, and waste liquid petroleum). The
last plan is no longer required with the re-write of AR 200-1. The SPCC is a
Class 1 finding while the ISCP is a Class 2 finding.
Solid Waste Management: The most consistent trend across all FYs is non-
participation in available recycling programs. Army personnel are not re-
quired to recycle, but are encouraged to do so. Class 3
Storage Tanks Management: The most prevalent findings from FY91 - 97
related to UST upgrading. After the UST issue, the next most common trend
(starting in FY95) is inadequate secondary containment for ASTs. Class 1
and 2 (USTs until December 1999).
Toxic Substances - PCBs: The only repetitive finding is the lack of required
markings on PCB equipment. This finding stems, in part, from transformers
located on Reserve property that are not clearly marked as to whether they
belong to the local utility company or the Army Reserve. Class 1
Toxic Substances -Asbestos: The same two issues show up in the top three in
each year for which there is data. These issues are the lack of or inadequate
asbestos survey and the lack of or inadequate Asbestos Management Plan.
Both of these findings are driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3
Toxic Substances - Radon: The only persistent finding across FYs, and in the
top three in every FY, is the lack of or incomplete radon measurements. This
finding is driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3
Wastewater: The most consistent trend across all FYs related to the surveil-
lance of stormwater discharge. This is not a regulatory requirement, but a
management practice. The second most persistent finding, across all FYs, is
the discharge of inappropriate materials/waste to the POTW/FOTW. Class 1
Water Quality: The most consistent trend across all FYs and the number one
finding is noncompliance with state and local regulations. This category en-
compasses a broad range of state-regulated issues. The most commonly re-
peated state-regulated issues across all FYs are improper well closure and
inadequate recordkeeping. Class 1
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 25
Army National Guard
When looking at the three most common findings in each topic area by FY across the Army National Guard, it is difficult to identify trends because there are only 2 years worth of data. See Appendix I for a tabular representation of this data.
Trends Across Topics
Program management issues such as training, recordkeeping, plans, permits, labeling, and reporting are not confined to a single topic area, but cross all top- ics. These program management issues account for 40 percent of all the find- ings:
Reporting Requirements = 1 percent Permits = 5 percent Training = 5 percent Labeling = 5 percent Program Management* = 7 percent Plans = 8 percent Recordkeeping = 8 percent
*Program Management encompasses staffing, budget, communications, policies, and procedures.
Numeric Analysis of Findings
Numbers of Findings
To define the validity of numeric analysis, it is important to understand the baseline. As represented in Table 1, data received from the Army Reserve date back further than any other data. But the Army Reserve had a more difficult time supplying current data. Table 1 represents the number of records in the database, by FY, for the Active Army, Army Reserve, and the Army National Guard. Additional data for FY98 and a portion of FY99 were not received until July 2000 and had not been comprehensively analyzed at the time of this report.
26 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Table 1. Number of database records by organization and FY.
FY Active Army Army Reserve Army National
Guard TOTAL Oct 1990-Sept 1991
(FY91) No data 58 No data 58
Oct 1991 -Sept 1992
(FY92)
No data 980 No data 980
Oct 1992-Sept 1993
(FY93)
No data 1974 No data 1974
Oct 1993-Sept 1994
(FY94)
2195 922 No data 3117
Oct 1994-Sept 1995
(FY95)
2669 37 No data 2706
Oct 1995-Sept 1996
(FY96)
1994 822 No data 2816
Oct 1996-Sept 1997
(FY97) 949 662 1541 3152
Oct 1997-Sept 1998
(FY98) 65 182 386 633
Oct 1998-Sept 1999
(FY99) 1180 No data No data 1180
Oct 1999-Sept 2000
(FY00) 439 No data No data 439
Positive Findings
A Positive finding is defined as one that documents an instance of going above and beyond compliance with the regulations, not just simple compliance. While reviewing the data it became clear that this definition was not always adhered to. Therefore, findings that were originally classed as Positive (898) that did not meet the definition for positive findings were reclassified as False Positives (399). This 49 percent reflects the desire of the auditor to give individuals a "pat on the back" for doing a difficult job well. There was no indication, however, of anything done that was unique or innovative. Instead of being documented as positive findings, these kinds of kudos are best conveyed verbally in the outbrief when commanding officers are present. See Appendices K, L, M, N, and O for specific details.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 27
Accuracy of Findings
Findings were classed as questionable for the following reasons:
Ql - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under regulations re-
lating to more than one size of hazardous waste generator. The text of the find-
ing does not document actual generator status.
Q2 - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under regulations re-
lating to both hazardous waste generators and TSDFs. The text of the finding
does not document actual generator status or TSDF status.
Q3 - The regulation cited is not relevant for the description provided in the text of this finding.
Q4 - The positive finding does not indicate the installation/facility has gone
above and beyond regulatory requirements or that they have shown extraordi-
nary initiative and innovation.
Q5 - The finding combines Class 1 and Class 3 regulatory requirements into one finding.
In reviewing the data (see Appendix P for numeric details) it is obvious that the
Army National Guard has virtually no questionable findings, an average of
1.5/yr for the 2 yr of data received; whereas the Active Army averaged 130 ques-
tionable findings per year for the 4 yr of complete data received and the Army
Reserve averaged 82 questionable findings per year. It can be concluded that the
Army National Guard has a superior quality assurance program to ensure that
the findings generated under ECAS are accurate.
For the Active Army, the primary reason for being questionable was a disconnect
between the description of the noncompliance situation and the cited regulation.
The most prevalent reason for the Army Reserve, however, is positive findings
that do not indicate going above and beyond. In talking to members of the Re-
serve about this issue, it was noted that some Reserve audit teams feel they al-
ways have to leave a facility with at least one positive finding, even if it is for
something like good landscaping.
Citations of Negative Findings
Findings are written up against one of three types of citations: (1) a manage-
ment practice finding based on a suggested good idea, (2) an AR/DOD finding
2§ . ______ ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
based on requirements found in Army Regulations, DOD Instructions, and/or
DOD Directives, and (3) a regulatory finding based on a state/local/Federal re-
quirement. As is to be expected, more regulatory findings were written than
management practices or AR/DOD. See Appendix Q.
Pollution Prevention Solutions
Rather than identifying pollution prevention (P2) solutions for all potential
compliance findings, the top 20 noncompliance findings for the Active Army were
analyzed for potential P2 solutions. Correcting most of the following findings
involves process change and/or proper training for applicable personnel instead
of a technological solution. However, the following programs might also facili-
tate compliance through "P2 glasses" across topic areas.
1. Diversifying the P2 Program: The P2 mission is to reduce or eliminate pollution
of land, air, and water resources. An individual can make an impact while im-
plementing a P2 program; however, one person rarely has enough knowledge or
expertise to understand everything related to P2. Forming a team of experts
from natural resources, energy conservation, compliance, and other environ-
mental areas can lead to better decisions, initiatives, and solutions by drawing on
the skills, knowledge, and experience of many disciplines.
2. Forming an internal PPOA Site Assessment Team: These "internal" site assess-
ments involve no regulators, are of short duration, and focus on solving mainte-
nance and environmental challenges. Solutions are sought that both protect the
environment and reduce workload and/or cost to the customer. Emphasis is
placed on finding, developing, and implementing only those material substitu-
tions, work process changes, and technology acquisitions that will not increase the burden of the producer.
No or Inadequate Characterization of Wastes (HW. 10.1)
P2 solutions: Not knowing the characterization of waste is a potential source of
pollution due to improper disposal and/or storage. Technologies/processes that can assist:
• Develop a waste analysis plan that serves to standardize and optimize the
required testing of wastes so that all wastes at a site are properly character-
ized prior to disposal in a simple and efficient manner. A waste analysis plan
establishes the characterization frequency and analytical requirements to be
satisfied for every identified waste at the installation and provides guidance
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 29
for handling new wastes. Components of the plan include: Responsibilities
for Characterization Prior to Disposal, Characterization by Generator
Knowledge of a Listed Hazardous Waste, and Determining the Frequency of
Characterization.
• HazMat Pharmacy Implementation: This approach includes a centralized
system responsible for control of hazardous material inventories from requi-
sition to disposal. The Pharmacy manages authorization, procurement, re-
ceipt, storage, issue, use, reuse/recycling, and eventual disposal. Knowing
what is on hand and procuring it will eliminate having inadequate charac-
terization of waste.
• Computerized tracking systems that may enhance or even be required by a
HazMat Pharmacy system. Tracking facilitates compliance with reporting
requirements and the data can provide accurate accounting for emergency
planning and community right-to-know (EPCRA) reporting as well as a his-
toric record of reductions in the use of specific hazardous materials. The
tracking begins when a material is ordered and follows the material and its
container through receipt, issue, use, return, reissue, recycling, and disposal.
Noncompliance With State and Local Wastewater Regulations (WA.3.1)
P2 solutions: There are no easy technological fixes; most of the findings can be
corrected through process change and/or training. However, a few storm water
and wastewater technologies may be enhancements:
• Sand filter for treating storm water runoff: Sand filters can be used for
storm water quality control and managing storm water runoffvolum.es. Sand
filters are composed of at least two components: a sedimentation chamber
and a filtration chamber. The sedimentation chamber removes floatables
and heavy sediments, while the filtration chamber removes additional pol-
lutants by filtering flow through a sand bed.
• Water quality inlets (WQIs) to control storm water runoff: WQIs are struc-
tures designed to separate pollutants from the first flush of storm water us-
ing a series of chambers for pollutant sedimentation, screening, and separa-
tion. A water quality inlet typically consists of a sedimentation chamber, an
oil separation chamber, and a discharge chamber. Because of their separa-
tion capabilities, WQIs are occasionally referred to as oil/grit separators or
oil/water separators. These best management practices (BMPs) may be con-
structed on site, precast, or manufactured by a vendor.
30 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
•
Wet detention ponds to treat storm water runoff: A wet detention pond is a
constructed pond that maintains a permanent pool of water within a desig-
nated area, a I relies on physical biological, and chemical processes to re-
move pollutants from storm water runoff. Pollutants removed include sedi-
ment, organic matter, dissolved metals, and nutrients. In addition, wet
detention ponds control storm water flow that prevents downstream flooding.
As storm water enters the pond, treated water is displaced and discharged into a receiving body of water.
Secondary use of acids and alkalis for wastewater treatment: The secondary
use of acids and alkalis as treatment chemicals in an Industrial Wastewater
Treatment Plant (IWTP) is a feasible waste reduction method, effectively re-
ducing the disposal of used or excess acids and alkalis. The secondary use of
acids and alkalis can reduce problems associated with disposal of acid and
alkali waste streams, such as the high cost and the liability of normal waste disposal.
Hydroblasting wastewater recycling system: This technology has been used
to successfully recycle wastewater generated during the hydroblasting of
ships' boilers. Hydroblasting is a time-consuming process that generates
12,000 to 20,000 gallons of wastewater containing heavy metals and sodium
nitrate. Sodium nitrate is added to the water used in the hydroblasting proc-
ess and acts as a surface conditioner that prevents flash rusting of boiler tube
surfaces during hydroblasting operations. It has been found that this wa-
ter/sodium nitrate mixture can be reused in the hydroblasting process with-
out adversely affecting the finished product only if the solids have been re- moved.
Laser reduction of toxic organic compounds in wastewater: Laser-Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction (LIPOD) is a method to photochemi-
cally oxidize organic compounds in wastewater. Using a laser, ultraviolet ra-
diation can be applied to organic compounds to achieve complete oxidation of a variety of organic compounds.
Reverse osmosis (RO) and ultrafiltration wastewater treatment process: RO
technology uses membrane separation systems typically to remove inorganic
salts from wastewater. However, RO can also be used to treat wastewater
containing some organic solvents. The RO system uses a semipermeable
membrane to separate pure water from contaminated liquids.
Evaporator for aqueous waste reduction: Evaporation is a proven technology
for reducing aqueous wastes. By using active evaporation or heating to
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 31
evaporate excess water, hazardous waste rinse water disposal or wastewater treatment can be minimized.
• Biological aqueous wastewater treatment system: The BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System (BATS) is a biological treatment system for contaminated
wastewater. This system uses naturally occurring microbes; however, where
highly toxic or recalcitrant target compounds are present, microbial amend-
ments are introduced.
• Precipitation and microfiltration wastewater treatment systems: The pre-
cipitation and microfiltration process uses a combination of treatments on a
variety of wastes. Chemical precipitation of heavy metals is the first treat-
ment in this process. Precipitates and all particles larger than 0.1 to 0.2 mi-
cron size are filtered through a unique tubular fabric crossflow microfilter.
Concentrate is dewatered using conventional processes, such as filter press or centrifuge.
• Powdered activated carbon wastewater treatment: The technology removes
organic contaminants from wastewater and minimizes the inhibitory effects
of process wastewater containing toxic organic compounds.
Noncompliance With State and Local Air Emissions Regulations (AE.3.1)
P2 solution: Process changes and/or training would correct most of the find-
ings. In respect to emissions from open burning/open detonation (OB/OD), the
BangBox testing chambers, emissions characterization of complete munitions,
and grouping munitions into emissions families so that future testing require-
ments can be abbreviated might prove to be viable P2 solutions to OB/OD emis-
sions. A draft report of the first subsurface BangBox test was completed in May 1997.
Noncompliance With State and Local Drinking Water/Water Quality Regulations (WQ.3.1)
P2 solution: All findings can be addressed by process change and/or training
programs. Following proper operations and maintenance (O&M) procedures and
scheduling guidelines would address any equipment failures.
3? ERDCCERLTR-01-34
Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Hazardous Materials (OSHA-based regulations pertaining to issues such as personal protection equipment [PPE] and eyewashes) (HM.2.1)
P2 solution: There is no P2 solution for these findings. It is a matter of keep-
ing abreast of a dynamic environmental regulatory environment.
Noncompliance With State and Local Solid Waste Regulations (SO.3.1)
P2 solution: Most findings can be addressed by process change and/or training
programs. Actual technologies/procedures that may assist in achieving compli-
ance and minimizing or prohibiting potential pollution follow:
• Recycling Sorting Line (RSL): An RSL, also known as a clean material recov-
ery facility (MRF) processes commingled recyclables from curbside collection
programs, drop-off sites, or satellite recycling centers. A properly designed
RSL will process and recover up to 90 percent of the collected material. Re-
covered material is ultimately re-sold to specialty recyclers. Materials proc-
essed include newspaper; steel and aluminum cans; brown, green, and clear
glass; polyethylene terephthalate (PET); and high-density polyethylene
(HDPE) plastics. An RSL serving a small community is typically designed to
process less than 50 tons/day of recyclables. An RSL serving a municipality
can process 200 to 300 tons/day of recyclables. A sorting line may keep poten-
tial HW or medical wastes from being landfilled.
Solid waste sorting line (SWSL): An SWSL, also known as a dirty MRF,
processes recyclables from a stream of raw solid waste and is typically used
in rural areas with no curbside programs or in communities that are not ac-
tively promoting recycling. A properly designed SWSL will process and re-
cover between 5 and 45 percent of the incoming material as recyclables; the
remainder is used in a waste-to-energy facility, landfilled, or otherwise dis-
posed of.
Use of collection containers for recycling: Using individual, dedicated (com-
partmentalized) recycling containers to separate common recyclables such as
plastics, glass, paper, cans, and compostables from both residential and
commercial waste streams eliminates or reduces the need to sort the materi-
als at the recycling center and results in lower processing costs. The contain-
ers may be placed at exterior or interior locations around the residential or
work areas, allowing the residents or personnel to place each type of material
in its own bin.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 33
Hazardous Waste Satellite Accumulation Point/Accumulation Point Limits Exceeded (HW. 75.1)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training. In addition, ensuring that the contractor (if picked up by a contractor) provides an adequate pick-up schedule based on usage.
Discharge of Oil Into or Upon Navigable Waters (PO. 15.1)
P2 solution: Ensure that spill and response plans are up-to-date and personnel are properly trained in procedures to follow in the event of an accidental dis- charge.
Inadequate or No Spill Containment and Cleanup Materials in POL Storage Areas (PO.20.1)
P2 solution: Can be solved by process changes and/or training.
Noncompliance With State and Local Hazardous Waste Regulations (HW.3.1)
P2 solution: The findings here can all be addressed by process change and/or training programs and following prescribed O&M schedules for all equipment.
Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Water Quality (WQ.2.1)
P2 solution: Process changes and/or adequate training to ensure compliance with Federal regulations.
Noncompliance With State and Local Storage Tank Regulations (ST.3.1)
P2 solution: Process changes and/or adequate training to ensure up-tordate re- cordkeeping and procedures are followed.
Noncompliance With or Lack of State/Federal NPDES for Point Source Discharges (WA. 10.1)
P2 solution: Process changes and/or adequate training.
34 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Discharges That Would Cause Pass Through or Interference at the POTW/ FOTW (WA.25.1)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training - following proper O&M proce- dures/schedules.
Improper Storage of Compressed Gas Cylinders (HM.45.1)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training - find out how and store the com- pressed cylinders correctly and safely.
Lack of "Used Oil" Label on ASTs (ST. 125.1)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training.
Lack of or Incomplete MSDSs (HM. 1.2)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training. Of course, procuring the correct and complete MSDS would correct the problem.
Inadequate Management and Organization of Paperwork (05.1.2.A)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training for personnel.
Inadequate Fire Protection for Flammable/Combustible Storage Areas (HM.35.9)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training. In this case, find out guidelines for fire protection and procure the proper equipment.
No or Incomplete Asbestos Survey (T2.1.3.A)
P2 solution: Process change and/or training. Either do the survey or finish it properly.
ERDC/CERL TR-01-34 35
03 C <
iS 03 Q 0
■ HM <D c O
■o TJ
0 CÖ
■D £ +J
3 Ö MM
03 o c CO
CO to CO
(0 CD
0 PC
■ HHI 4H* r-C ■ HM ■■ X ■ HM
ü £
03 _fi
U. F fc </> c 4J
T3 o Ö ■ ■■1 wf/mJ T3
03 cö ■Hl s Hl
03 s +•* o
<n o c o ■■■ c?
§ >>
PQ
< T3 CD
X ö ■ HHI cö "D s-i
C o
o •pH
Q. CO
Q. CO
< EH
o 3|
pC 0) >> s
3
s a, CO o m
13 <
*-< <
'o 1 '2
s
3 s ca
P3 i i kl es fti n ;>> « X!
(XI C0 £ 6 cö o < 1-4 Q 1—( s < eu H
CO
Q
c kl
>> 6
'S o
4J o a
SH o 0) «! E-i «
cö -u cö
XI o
k,
3 o
a c <
o a a> P
kl <1>
i
s ü <
p—i O
o o CO
CO cö
m S rl >> m TJ £ s-i
< C0
>> 3 cö e 1—H
fl P3
cö o tj-4
CL, ■e >^ 3 o s
o
CO 0)
s 3 < r< < DH
CÖ
3 CO CO kl
<
< o 3
Cü 3
o >, -U
CO S Ö cö
Q < P* >> cö p«
id s r3
c ^
cö EH
s kl < kl
> s
CU
3 CÖ
o a CO
Q
cö 3 CO co SH
<
36 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
05
2
CO
£ £
I-» 05
a
o> 01 SH be
«0
o a O
Ö o c Cd SH CJ
CO
>> £ SH
<; 03 SH SH
co
-u o a a> Q
o
C
CO
ca c c « >> o
o ft Q >> £ s- <
ca O >> £ SH
< CO
S3 riso
n - S
elfr
id
•
Wh
ite
San
ds
0) M C ca
Pi eu
'in tn
s
-u 1
>> o to be C £
c
>> ft 0> -a
«5
2 < Q r5 >>
> o s-1 en
PH T3 r* C -u <u -»j .tn SH ca c k ca > C3
o a a) o o
o a. a>
CO
£ '■5 O
Cd
C3 13 3 s- CO O H Q t) <C c >H Ü
>> >> £ +J %
CO
£ Si
£ «Si
SH c cS
03 0>
C3
05 SH PH +3
f* o -u <2 r! O X c
o k Ö 0)
o PH cB
SH •a C
c ■f—1
-t-> c
•PH ca
CO U CO w H > CO
• • • •
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 37
hn bn o o cd SH
m -t-i fa
•
CD
J
fa
•
0) ^3 ft bn
05 s cB u fa
•
CO
s • 1—1
M CO
•
S '3 '3 •- EH
SH CD
c CD
Ü
00 03
CO
O
55
C fi fi o o CO
SH
fa CO
CS
H fa
I—«
bo bo cB SH
pa
s CO
r—1 r—H
'6
Ö ca
'S Ö
t-H
CO
-fi fa
CJ
ft£ ^s 0) cB +J cB _,j o W fa fa fa fa O fa
• • • • •
£> 1
fi +J Fi CB
?P s e CO CO
CD
co +» fa
3 E-H CD
£ £ 3 SH
Q
fa fa
CD
fa
fi l-H 1»
SH
3 Yak
ima
ing
Cen
•
c o
Ö ■*->
«5
£ o co '- cB O • 1-4
P s CS
T3 O O
a fa S3 +J -t-> +J -u -*-> -u fa fa fa fa fa fa
fi rl !# o o CO
-4-> SH
o <* £
c cB
'•& fi
t—4 ft
CD
,fi fa
02 -t-J fa o fa
o fa
• •
d OS T!
CD
£ fa <
O CD
O 0)
CB
CD >>
+J +J CD +-> fa fa fa
• • •
CO £ CO
£ CO
o
•
t^ £ cB
£ -i-5 CO
O
55
•
CD +J
d CO
4) CD CD O co bjo •i—< "fi o £ SH
o CD
O CD
CB
Xl O
OH S» -l->
CD +j +J c3
fa fa fa fa
• • •
1
e CD r) SH
£ fi o
_C (—H
SH
< •
Iß fi o
'+3 cB
55 CD
• F
t. B
elvo
i
• F
t. M
yer
•<* £ cd
£ CB
T3 9m O
£ 55
•
38 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
© c o © T; ^ >- J. _j
I* ^ ,2 fa £
•
05 03 -u>
£ O 2
•
X CS
2 C3
C X) &U| O
2
•
t> CO 05 -l-J
£ T> O 2
•
TJ CD 0)
«0 tf 05 S-
e £ 3 •
^ u 10 i* 05 CD
£ Q •+J fa
•
■* ca
05 CS
^ T)
ft o 2
• •
© 02 © ^-.
£ fa
•
c CD en O
05 en 3
fa
TJ X S-, n fr
£ £
o Ü
o o «5
o
CO -U ■+-> -M -1-3 +J -*^> fa fa fa fa fa fa
fi o en
a r*
05 o
£ •"3
fa
•
e O
05 u O a fa
•
X o
fa
•
c CS
CD CD Cw
«0 CS
a>
Ü
O
fi Tl O CD
• Ü S-, 05 ,a o o u i—1 T) CD
£ o § s o w .-5 -w co ö CD o
-4J 4-> -U 4J +J fa S fa fa fa fa fa
CS
bo fi
"S C CD
«
co CO
s
u 3
^3 a CS
3 K
fi o CO
u CS
S-< CS
c o CD
od
Ru
cer
05 -U -*j -u +J ■+J
^ fa fa fa fa fa fa
£ •
C O • •
05
X)
o CD (1) o e O
fa -t->
fa
H • • •
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 39
s 02
c o be
3 c (X!
3 ÖS
- 03
CD
4S 01
ID CD '53
o "3
6 03 CO
CD
CD
Q CO o 03
+-> +J -*-> +J o <! ^ fa fa fa fa fa OH
a CD s» < a
>>
CD «3 O
u cs
u CO
■~
03 CO CQ
< C
CD o CD
"03 T3 "03
ft Tl CD «Ö SH
CD £ <!
03
O
03 T3 o
55
c o en
I £ OH Ü
be ■c
a '03
fa fa fa
03
o 55
03
O
55
05
•
U
.S.
Arm
y M
ili-
tary
Aca
dem
y
00 03
a
o 55
•
03
03 -a o
55
•
CO
•
U.S
. Arm
y M
ili-
tary
Aca
dem
y
1ft 03
H-> 03
TJ O
55
•
03 +J 03
TJ O
55
•
IH CD
s c
fa fa
<B
>>
0) c o
TJ CO CO
& CO C
_0 +3 ja 13 +» CO fi
I^-H
CO <u
'S
ho C
•I-H
Ö
o Ü
40 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix B: Definitions for Fields in ACCESS Database
• FFID - Federal Facility ID Number • NAME - Name of the facility/installation assessed • MACOM - Name of Major Army Command the facility/installation belongs to.
Options in this field include:
AMC TRADOC
FORSCOMM USARC
MEDCOM USARPAC
MDW USMA
MUSARC - used for Reserve facilities for additional identification CITY - location for facility/installation assessed STATE - location for the facility/installation assessed COUNTRY - country of the facility/installation assessed FISCAL YEAR - FY the assessment was conducted ASSESSMENT DATE - dates the assessment occurred FINDING ID - number used as a unique record identifier LAW/REG - identifies the law/statute that is the authority for the noncompli- ance finding. Options in this field include:
Code: Definition:
CAA Clean Air Act
CURL Cultural Resources
CWA Clean Water Act
ESA Endangered Species Act
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 41
EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act
FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
MULT Multiple
NATR Natural Resources
NCA Noise Control Act
NEPA National Environmental Protection Act
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act
PRVN Pollution Prevention
RCRA-C Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subpart C
RCRA-D Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subpart D
RCRA-I Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subpart I
SD WA Safe Drinking Water Act
SFND Superfund
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
• MANUAL SECTION - identifies which section of the TEAM Guide or associ-
ated Supplement the finding was written under.
Manual Section: Question Number Prefix:
Air Emissions AE
Cultural Resources CR
Hazardous Materials HM
__! . ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Hazardous Waste HW
Natural Resources NR
Other Env. Issues, NEPA 01
Other Env Issues, Noise 02
Other Env. Issues, IRP 03
Other Env. Issues, P2 04
Other Env Issues, Program Mgt. 05
Pesticides PM
POL Management PO
Solid Waste SO
Storage Tanks ST
Toxic Substances, PCB Tl
Toxic Substances, Asbestos T2
Toxic Substances, Radon T3
Toxic Substances, LBP T4
Wastewater WA
Water Quality WQ
• QUESTION NUMBER - The checklist item number from U.S. TEAM Guide
and/or its affiliated Supplements.
• QUESTIONABLE FINDING - Indicates that this finding is questionable.
The reason it is questionable is listed in the REASON FOR
QUESTIONABLE field.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 43
• REASON FOR QUESTIONABLE - Indicates why the finding is questionable. These reason are as follows:
Ql - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under
regulations relating to more than one size of hazardous waste gen-
erator. The text of the finding does not document actual generator status
Q2 - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under
regulations relating to both hazardous waste generator and
TSDFs. The text of the finding does not document actual genera-
tor status or TSDF status.
Q3 - The regulation cited is not relevant for the description pro- vided in the text of this finding.
Q4 - The positive finding does not indicate the installation/facility
has gone above and beyond regulatory requirements or that they
have shown extraordinary initiative and innovation.
Q5 - The finding combines Class 1/HS and Class 3 regulatory requirements into one finding.
• POSITIVE/NEGATIVE - indicates whether the finding was positive, nega- tive, or a false positive.
• CLASS - indicates whether the finding is Class 01, 02, 03, HS. For the pur-
poses of this database Class 1 is any finding based on a Federal, state, or lo-
cal regulations. Class 2 findings are those that have a compliance date after
the date of the assessment. Classes 3 are based on Agency/DOD require-
ments and/or management practices. Class HS is based on a health and
safety requirement that is not fundable with environmental funds.
• CORRECTED - when entered, indicates when the noncompliance was cor-
rected. This field being empty is not a definite indicator that noncompliance has not been corrected.
• REPEAT - indicates if the finding is a repeat of a finding in a previous as- sessment.
• COST - estimated cost to attain compliance.
• TENANT NAME - used when a tenant is assessed at a larger facility
• LOCATION - where the noncompliance is occurring.
• FINDING SUMMARY - short summary of what was wrong
if ERDCCERLTR-01-34
• ROOTCODE - root cause codes. Options for this field include:
Materials:
Ml - Supply
M2 - Poor Quality
Personnel:
PI -Awareness of Requirement
P2 - Understanding
P3 - Not Conscientious (deals with attitude of personnel)
P4 - Result v. Action (The result did not equal the action taken.
Procedures were followed that should have produced a favorable
result but did not.)
P5 - Accountability Not Assigned
P6 - Action v. Procedure (correct procedure(s) in place but incorrect
action taken)
P7 - Insufficient Skills
P8 - Inexperience (not an attitude of personnel)
Equipment:
El - Controls Failure
E2 - Inadequate Facility Design
E3 - Monitoring Equipment Failure
E4 - Poor Maintenance
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 45
Techniques:
Tl - Time to Do the Job
T2 - No Procedures in Place
T3 - Priority Conflict
T4 - Inadequate Procedures
T5 - Procedures Not Available
• CRITERIA - text of the requirement, including regulatory citation, from the
TEAM Guide or affiliated supplements.
• FINDING DESCRIPTION - the details of noncompliance.
• SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS - assessor provided guidance on how to attain compliance.
• CORRECTP7E ACTION - actions taken toward compliance.
• FINDING COMMENT - additional comments
• CORRECTIVE ACTION COMMENT - additional comments on corrective ac- tions.
• BRANCH - indicates which branch of the service the data came from. AA - Active Army
USARC -Army Reserves
ARNG -Army National Guard
• KEY WORD INDEX - index terms to allow for a narrower search of the data.
46 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix C: Keyword Index
Aboveground Storage Tank - use AST Accumulation Point Aerosol Cans Air Pollution Control Device Air Quality Antifreeze AR/DOD - used to identify findings based on an AR, DODI, or DODD citation. Archeological Resources Asbestos AST (aboveground storage tank) Automobile Air Conditioning - use MVAC Backflow Prevention Device Ballasts BASH - Bird Air Strike Hazard Program Batteries - term is used for all types of batteries Berm - use SECONDARY CONTAINMENT Biennial Report - use REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Biomonitoring - used for Whole Effluent Toxicity testing of WWTP effluent Blast Facility Boilers Brakes Budget Process Building - use of an unsuitable building Capacitor Cathodic Protection Cemetery CVWF - Central Vehicle Wash Facility Central washrack - see CVWF CFC Chlorination Facility Chemical Analysis Cleanup Closure
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 47
Coastal Zone
Coliform
Communication Equipment
Community Relations
Community Right To Know - use EPCRA
Community Water System - use POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
Compaction - i.e., landfill operation
Complaint Investigation System
Compliance Agreement
Compost
Composting Toilet
Compressed Gas
Construction Activity (re NPDES stormwater permits)
Construction/Demolition Waste
Consultation
Container - condition of waste storage container
Container Management
Contaminated Dry Sweep - use SPILL RESPONSE MATERIALS Contaminated Soil
Contract
Cooling Water
Cross Connection Program - use CROSS-CONNECTION Cross-Connection
Cultural Resources
Curation Facilities
CX - Categorical Exclusion
Cylinders - if appropriate, use COMPRESSED GAS instead
Decontamination Facilities
Degreaser - equipment, not cleaning compounds
Demolition
Design Criteria - a structural or equipment requirement
Dike - use SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
Dilution
Dining Facilities
Disinfection
Discharge - the deliberate release of a substance into the air, water, or soil.
Disposal
48 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Documentation - if the issue is "required records are not kept onsite," use "Record-
keeping"; if the issue is "required information of some form is not submitted to a
required person/agency" use "Reporting Requirements"
Dredging
Drinking Water - use Potable Water System
Drip Pan - use Secondary Containment
Drums
Drycleaning
Dumpsite
Dumpster - "dumpster" or other solid waste storage container
Dust Control
EA - Environmental Assessment as related to NEPA
Earthen Dike - use SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
EIS - Environmental Impact Statement
Electric Arc Furnace
Emergency Planning - use for "Contingency Plan"
Emergency Planning Commission - use EMERGENCY PLANNING
Emergency Response Equipment
Emergency Response Team
Emission Controls
Emission Sources
Endangered/Protected Species
Environmental Justice
Environmental Noise
EPCRA
EQCC
Erosion
Exception Report - use REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Excess Materials
Exercise Plan
Facility Response Plan
Fence - use Security
Filling Station - use FUEL DISPENSING FACILITY
Filters
Filtration
Fire Control
Firing Range
Fish and wildlife - See Wildlife Management
Flammable Storage
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 49
Flammable Storage Cabinet - use FLAMMABLE STORAGE Flammable Storage Container - use FLAMMABLE STORAGE Flocculation Floodplain Fluorescent Lightbulbs Fluoridation Followup Inspection - use INSPECTION Food Waste Forestry FOTW - use TREATMENT WORKS Freon - use CFC Fuel - used instead of MOGAS or Gasoline Fuel Dispensing Facility - used for fuel dispensing of any kind, MOGAS, diesel, or
aircraft fuel (i.e., gas stations, service stations, etc.) Fuel Dispensing - refers to vehicle refueling from tankers, fueling operations, fueling
areas, etc. Fuel Filter Fugitive Dust - use FUGITIVE EMISSIONS Fugitive Emissions Fugitive Particulate Emissions - use FUGITIVE EMISSIONS Gasoline - use FUEL Generator - use only for power generators - not generators of hazardous waste Grease Grease Interceptor - use GREASE TRAP Crease Trap Ground Water Habitat Management Halon Hazardous Air Polluant Hazardous Materials Storage Hazardous Waste Storage HAZCOM HAZWOPER - use Training Heating Oil Tank Historic Preservation Household Hazardous Waste Housekeeping Ice ICUZ - Installation Compatible Use Zone
Ü9. . ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Illegal Dumping
Incinerator
Incinerator Ash
Incompatibles
Indoor Air Quality
Industrial Waste Treatment Plant - use TREATMENT WORKS
Industrial Wastewater
Infectious Waste
I&I - inflow & infiltration
Inspection
Installation Compatible Use Zone - Use ICUZ
Installation On-scene Coordinator (IOSC)
Installation Response Team - use SPILL RESPONSE TEAM
Installation Restoration Program
Interstitial Monitoring Equipment
Inventory
IOSC - installation on-scene coordinator
IRP - use CLEANUP
ISCP - Installation Spill Contingency Plan (an AR/DOD requirement) ITAM
Labeling
Laboratory
Land Application
Land Management
Landfill
Landfill Closure
Landfill Cover
Landfill Gas
Landscape
LBP - use LEAD-BASED PAINT
Leachate
Leach Field - if referring to domestic sewage - see SEPTIC SYSTEM
Lead-Based Paint
Leak - use RELEASE
Leak Detection
Liquid Petroleum Products - use POL
Litter
Loading Area - referring to loading/unloading facilities, areas, or operations for rail-
road cars, coal piles, tank trucks, etc.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 51
Log - use RECORDKEEPING
Maintenance
Management - organizational or management deficiency
Management Practice
Manifests
Maximum Contaminant Levels
Medical Monitoring
Medical Waste
Mess Hall - use DINING FACILITIES
Minimization
Mitigation Measure
Mixed Waste - i.e., radioactive and hazardous waste
Mobile Tanks
Modification
MOGAS-use FUEL
Monitoring
Monitoring Wells
MSDS
Munitions - improper storage or handling of munitions and related products or resi- due
MVAC
National Register
Native American
NEPA
Neutralization
Nickel-Cadmium Batteries - use BATTERIES
Noncommunity Water System - use POTABLE WATER SYSTEM
Notification - use REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
NOV - Notice of violation
NOx
NPDES
NPL (National Priorities List)
OB/OD
Occupational Health Assessment Program
Odor
Off Road Vehicle
Oil
OÜ Dry - use SPILL RESPONSE MATERIALS
Oil Filter
52 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Oil Sheen Oil Soaked Rag - use OILY RAGS Oil-based Paint Oil/Water Separator Oily Rags Opacity Open Burn Pit - use OPEN BURNING Open Burning (for trash) Open Detonation - use OB/OD Open Dump Operation & Maintenance - use O&M Operations Manual Operator Ordnance Overfill Prevention Oxygen Cylinder - use COMPRESSED GAS Ozone Depleting Chemicals P2 Opportunity Paint Booth Particulates Parts Washer - use DEGREASER PCBs Permit Pesticide Applications Pesticide Applicators Pesticide Mixing Area Pesticides Photo Lab Pinkwater Plans Point Source Discharge POL - petroleum, oils, and lubricants POL storage POL Transfer Facility Potable Water Storage Tank Potable Water Well Potable Water Treatment POTW - use TREATMENT WORKS PPE
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 53
Procurement
Program Management - use to describe issues such as poor internal communication, complete lack of a program, poor internal processes
Programmatic Agreement Propane Cylinder - use COMPRESSED GAS Protected Species - see Endangered/Protected Species QRP (Qualified Recycling Program) Radon REC - Record of Environmental Consideration Recordkeeping Recreation Recycling Red Bag Waste - use MEDICAL WASTE Refrigerant Recovery Equipment Registration Regulated Medical Waste - use MEDICAL WASTE Regulation - This is used to identify findings based on Federal, state, or local regula-
tions. Regulatory Library - This is used to identify findings mandating facili-
ties/installations to keep a library of environmental regulations. Release - an accidental spill or leak Release Detection Reporting Requirements Reservoirs Restoration Restricted Use Pesticides Rinsings ROWPUs - Reverse Osmosis Water Purification Units - equipment used to produce
drinking water Runoff Control Safety Sampling Sandblasting Secondary Containment Section 106 - use HISTORIC PRESERVATION Section 404 - use WETLANDS Security Segregation - separating different material or waste types Septic System
54 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Sewage Sludge
Sharps
Shelf Life
SHPO - State Historic Preservation Officer
Signs
Sludge - for all sludge except sewage sludge (see SEWAGE SLUDGE)
Soil Conservation
Solid Waste Management Plan
SPCCP
Spill-use RELEASE
Spill Response Materials
Spill Response Team
Spill/Overfill Protection
Status - hazardous waste generator status
Storage
Storage Building
Storage Cabinets
Storage Locker
Storage Shed - use STORAGE BUILDING
Storage Tank - use AST - aboveground storage tank or UST - underground storage
tank when the finding indicates which one. Use storage tank when it cannot be
determined.
Stormwater
SWPPP (stormwater pollution prevention plan)
Survey
Swimrning pool
Tanker Truck Purging
Tier 2 - use EPCRA
Tier 1 - use EPCRA
Tires
Training
Training Activities
Transformers
Transportation
Trash
TRC - Technical Review Committee
Treated Wood
Treatment - general term for hazardous waste treatment
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 55
Treatment Works - identifies a facility and the wastewater collection system used for
the processing and conveyance of industrial and/or domestic wastewater. Use
WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM when the finding only refers to the col-
lection system or components of the collection system, and not the WWTP. Turbidity
Underground Storage Tank
UST
Universal Waste
Used OÜ
Vectors
Vehicle Maintenance
Ventilation
VOCs
Washrack
Waste Characterization
Wastewater Treatment Plant - use TREATMENT WORKS
Wastewater CoUection System - use WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM when
the finding refers to only the collection system or components of the collection system, and not the WWTP.
Water Cooler
Water Conservation
Water/Wastewater Reclamation - Use WATER CONSERVATION
Water Treatment Plant - use POTABLE WATER TREATMENT
Weapons Cleaning
Wellhead Protection Program
Wetlands
White Goods
Wildlife Management
Woodworking
X-Ray Lab - X-ray film processing facility or operations; X-ray developing room
Yard Waste
56 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix D: Trends by Legislative Authority
Trends for the Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard
Authority Active Army
Army
Reserve
Army
Guard
Clean Air Act 683 426 82
Cultural Resources 160 27 3
Clean Water Act 1539 831 751
Endangered Species Act 29 15 3
EPCRA 54 26 1
FIFRA 768 74 36
Multiple 314 284 4
Natural Resources 307 50 51
Noise Control Act 168 219 16
NEPA 249 83 65
National Historic
Preservation Act
172 57 65
OSHA 1033 1360 15
Pollution Prevention 94 82 8
RCRA-C 1536 893 628
RCRA-D 570 311 84
RCRA-I 447 125 134
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 57
Authority Active Army
Army
Reserve
Army
Guard
Safe Drinking Water Act 705 107 6
Superfund 52 70 20
TSCA 231 564 5
Trends for Active Army Major Commands
Authority AMC TRA- DOC
FORS- COM
MDW MED- COM
USAR- PAC
USMA
Clean Air Act 207 219 222 58 27 36 20
Cultural Resources 22 37 69 20 9 13 6
Clean Water Act 331 439 639 112 61 77 21
Endangered Species
Act
9 10 8 1 1 0 0
EPCRA 20 15 12 5 0 1 0
FIFRA 172 176 216 81 45 43 10
Multiple 59 67 67 41 10 28 14
Natural Resources 74 64 110 16 11 16 5
Noise Control Act 25 39 76 6 0 18 0
NEPA 111 48 57 7 6 12 2
National Historic
Preservation Act
76 15 52 9 5 5 3
OSHA 82 361 296 124 54 58 35
Pollution Prevention 16 19 31 5 2 17 0
RCRA-C 237 384 687 90 32 45 27
RCRA-D 66 171 219 43 17 33 20
58 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Authority AMC TRA- DOC
FORS- COM
MDW MED- COM
USAR- PAC
USMA
RCRA-I 89 98 195 18 10 22 3
Safe Drinking Water
Act
125 195 179 69 35 45 17
Superfund 12 8 23 2 0 5 2
TSCA 88 46 47 11 5 22 5
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 59
Appendix E: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1994-2000 by Topic for the Active Army
FORSCOM
Topic Finding
Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE.3.1) Class 1
(i.e., open burning; permits; cold cleaner degreaser lids)
2. No or inadequate signs on fuel pumps (AE.55.2) Class 1
3. No or incomplete quarterly CFC procurement report
(AE.85.1.A) Class 1
3. Inadequate training for mechanics on freon recovery
equipment (AE.90.1) Class 1
Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National Regis-
ter (CR.5.1) Class 1
2. Inadequate management of historic properties affected by
undertakings (CR.5.3) Class 1
3. Inadequate historic preservation plan (CR.5.1.A) Class 3
Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (HM.45.1) HS
2. Containers of hazardous materials are not correctly labeled,
tagged, or marked (HM.1.3) HS
3. No or incomplete MSDSs (HM. 1.2) HS
3. No or inadequate written hazard communication program
(HM. 10.1) HS
Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Inadequate waste determination (HW. 10.1) Class 1
2. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1) Class 1
3. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (HW.3.1)
(i.e., training records; 90-day limit exceeded; satellite accu-
mulation points; labeling; unknown waste) Class 1
60 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
FORSCOM
Topic
Natural Resources Mgt.
Finding
Other Environmental Issues:
NEPA
Other Env. Issues: Noise
Other Env. Issues: IRP
1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR.1.3.A) Class 1
2. Insufficient vegetative cover to control dust and erosion
damage (NR.10.9.A) Class 3
3. No or inadequate survey of endangered and threatened spe-
cies (NR.20.1) Class 1
1. EA not produced when required (01.5.2) Class 1
1. NEPA implementation activities not executed (01.1.3.A)
Class 1
3. EA does not contain required information (01.5.20) Class 1
1. No or incomplete ICUZ study (02.1.3.A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate ICUZ committee (02.1.4.A) Class 3
3. No or incomplete operational data on noise producing ac-
tivities (02.1.9.A) Class 3
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (03.3.1)
(i.e., USTs; contaminated soil) Class 1
2. Inadequate removal site evaluation (03.1.2) Class 1
3. Inadequate screening for past use of hazardous substances
(03.1.3.A)CTass3
3. Inadequate community relations activities (03.10.2) Class 1
Other Env. Issues: P2 1. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete (04.5.1)
Class 1
1. Hazardous materials management is not considered an in-
tegral part of hazardous waste minimization (04.10.2. A)
Class 3
Inadequate implementation of P2 recommendations
(04.1.9A) Class 3
Inadequate consideration of P2 initiatives (04.5.2) Class 1
3.
3.
Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. l.A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate EQCC (05.1.6A) Class 3
3. Inadequate environmental training (05.7.l.A) Class 3
Pesticides Mgt. 1. No comprehensive IPMP (PM.1.4.A) Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 61
FORSCOM
Topic Finding
1. Inadequate pesticide storage facility (PM.45.4.A) Class 3
3. No or inadequate pest management coordinator (PM. 1.3.A)
Class 3
3. Inadequate pesticide mixing/storage sites (PM.45.3.A) Class
3
3. No or inadequate spill control kits (PM.45.8A) Class 3
POL Mgt. 1. Discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters (PO. 15.1)
Class 1
2. No or inadequate spill containment and cleanup materials
(PO.20.1) Class 1
3. No "USED OIL" label on containers other than tanks
(PO.65.6) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (SO.3.1)
(i.e., open dumping; waste tire storage; biomedi-
cal/biohazardous waste; permits; condition of dumpsters;
grease storage; training) Class 1
2. Inadequate participation in state/local recycling programs
(S0.25.1.A) Class 3
3. Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid waste
(SO. 10.1) Class 1
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Lack of "used oil" label on ASTs (ST. 125.1) Class 1
2. Lack of spill overfill protection for substandard USTs
(ST.30.1A) Class 3
3. Substandard USTs not upgraded, closed, or removed
(ST.25.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No or inadequate annual PCB document log (Tl. 15.1)
Class 1
2. Inadequate PCB items storage areas (Tl.40.2) Class 1
3. Inadequate >50 ppm PCBs and PCB items storage areas
(Tl.40.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or incomplete asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3
2. No or incomplete Installation Asbestos Management Plan
(T2.1AA) Class 3
62 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
FORSCOM
Topic Finding
3. Improper disposal of asbestos containing material (T2.15.1)
Class 1
Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (T3.3.1)
(i.e., radon reduction program incomplete) Class 1
2. No or inadequate mitigation of structures (T3.1.12.A) Class
3
Toxic Substances, LBP 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (T4.3.1)
(i.e., no lead hazard management program) Class 1
Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WA.3.1)
(i.e., unpermitted discharges; NPDES permit violations; re-
view of sanitary sewer service agreements; improper opera-
tion and maintenance of treatment systems; inadequate
secondary containment; permit limits exceeded; sludge re-
moval records not maintained; inadequate implementation
of stormwater pollution prevention plans) Class 1
2. No or noncompliance with existing state/Federal NPDES
for point source discharges (WA.10.1) Class 1
3. Discharges that would cause pass through or interference
at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1
Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WQ.3.1)
(i.e., abandoned wells not plugged; testing/disinfection after
water main repair; failure to notify public when levels ex-
ceeded; wells too close to possible source of contamination;
no cross connection control program; no emergency contin-
gency plans) Class 1
2. Inappropriate swimming pool operations and maintenance
(WQ.4.1.A) «ass 3
3. No SOP for alerting personnel of emergencies (WQ. 1.5.A)
Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 63
TRADOC
Topic Finding
Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE.3.1)
(i.e., permits; open burning; cold cleaner degreaser lid not
closed; inadequate emissions inventory; fugitive emis-
sions; incinerator operator training; gasoline tanks/pumps
do not meet requirements; insufficient recordkeeping; in-
adequate recordkeeping) Class 1
2. No or inadequate signs on fuel pumps (AE.55.2) Class 1
3. Immersion batch cold solvent cleaners left open. (AE. 116.1) Class 1
Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National Reg-
ister (CR.5.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate ICRMP (CR.5.1.A) Class 1
3. No or inadequate regulation of the excavation of archeo-
logical sites. (CR. 15.1) Class 1
Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Inadequate fire protection for flammable/combustible
storage areas (HM.35.9) HS
2. No or incomplete MSDS (HM. 1.2) HS
3. Inadequate flammable storage cabinets (HM.35.4) HS
Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (HW.3.1)
(i.e., improper storage; uncharacterized waste) Class 1
2. Inadequate waste characterization (HW. 10.1) Class 1
3. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1)
Class 1
Natural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR. 1.3.A) Class 1
2. No or incomplete survey of endangered and threatened
species (NR.20.1) Class 1
3. No or noncompliance with existing permit for discharge of
dredged or fill material to waters (NR.5.1) Class 1
3. Floodplains and wetlands are not identified/protected
(NR.10.2) Class 1
64 ERDC'CERLTR-01-34
TRADOC
Topic Finding
Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. No or incomplete preparation of an EA (01.5.4.A) Class 1
2. NEPA is not integrated into planning (01.5.1) Class I
3. EA not produced when needed (01.5.2) Class 1
Other Environmental Issues: Noise 1. No or inadequate ICUZ study (02.1.3.A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate ICUZ committee (02.1.4.A) Class 3
3. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure (02.1.10.A)
Class 3
3. No or inadequate operational data on noise producing
activities (02.1.9.A) Class 3
Other Env. Issues, IRP N/A
Other Env. Issues, P2 1. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete
(04.5.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate use of life cycle cost analysis.
(O4.10.5.A)Cfass3
Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 1. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. l.A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate EQCC (05.1.6.A) Class 3
3. Inadequate training for environmental personnel
(05.7.1A) Class 3
Pesticides Mgt. 1. Inadequate pesticide storage facility (PM.45.4.A) Class 3
2. No or insufficient spill control kits (PM.45.8.A) Class 3
3. Noncompliance with pesticide storage requirements
(PM.45.1) Class 1
POL Mgt. 1. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials
(PO.20.1) Class 1
2. Discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters (PO. 15.1)
Class 1
3. Missing "USED OIL" label on containers other than
tanks (PO.65.6) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (SO.3.1)
(i.e., open dumping; waste tire storage; unpermitted land-
fill; hazardous waste in landfill; landfill cover; landfill
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 65
TRADOC
Topic Finding
security; improper biomedical waste disposal; inadequate
recycling; improper grease storage) Class 1
2. Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid
waste (SO. 10.1) Class 1
2. Nonparticipation in state/local recycling programs
{SO.2b.lA) Class 3
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. No or inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage tanks (ST.5.1) Class 1
1. UST, no prevention of overfilling and spilling (ST.45.1) Class 1
3. Inadequate UST closure (ST.95.3) Class 1
Toxic Substances, PCB 1. Inadequate PCB items storage areas (Tl.40.2) Class 1
2. No ML markings for PCB equipment (Tl. 10.2) Class 1
3. Inadequate PCB shipping containers. (Tl.40.5) Class 1
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or inadequate asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3
2. No or incomplete identification of the existence, extent
and condition of all asbestos (T2.1.6.A) Class 3
3. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management Plan iT2.1AA) Class 3
Toxic Substances, Radon N/A
Toxic Substances, LBP 1. No or inadequate LBP Management Program (T4.1.3.A)
Class 3
2. No or inadequate notification of housing occupants of
potential LBP hazards. (T4.10.1) Class 1
Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WA.3.1)
(i.e., violations of pretreatment standards; unpermitted
discharges; inadequate implementation of stormwater
pollution prevention plan; open floor drains; oil/water
separator maintenance; oil water separator discharges;
noncompliance with discharge permits; inadequate spill
containment) Class 1
2. No or noncompliance with existing state/Federal NPDES
66 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
TRADOC
Topic Finding
for point source discharges (WA.10.1) Class 1
3. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW (WA.25.2) Class 1
Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WQ.3.1)
(i.e.. wells located near contamination source; abandoned
wells not plugged; no cross connection control program;
inadequate maintenance/training) Class 1
2. Inadequate swimming pool operations and maintenance
(WQ.4.1.A)CTass3
3. No SOP for alerting personnel of emergencies (WQ.1.5.A)
Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 67
Topic
Air Emissions Mgt.
Cultural Resources Mgt.
Hazardous Materials Mgt.
Hazardous Waste Mgt.
AMC
Finding
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE .3.1)
(i.e., unpermitted sources; incomplete permits; outdated
permits; inadequate recordkeeping; noncompliance with
permit requirements) Class 1
2. Inadequate refrigeration recovery and recycling equip-
ment (AE.90.5) Class 1
3. No or inadequate Title V permifair emissions inventory (AE.1.2) Class 1
1. No identification of historic properties affected by
undertakings (CR.5.3) Class 1
2. No or incomplete historic properties survey/National
Register (CR.5.1) Class 1
3. CRMO not designated/training inadequate (CR. 1.3.A) Class 3
3. No or inadequate preparation and implementation of an HPP. (CR.5.1.A) Class 3
1. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (HM.45.1)
HS
2. Extremely hazardous substances present/LEPC
(HM.25.1)
3. Noncompliance with SARA III requirements. (HM.30.1) Class 1
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (HW.3.1)
(i.e., inadequate labeling; unregistered accumulation
points; inadequate secondary containment; submission
of incomplete reports; incompatible storage; outdated
contingency plans) Class 1
2. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1) Class
1
3. 90-day limit exceeded on storage of hazwaste (HW.55.1)
Class 1
68 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
AMC
Topic Finding
Natural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR.1.3A) Class 1
2. Land management operations not consistent with mod-
ern conservation and land use principles (NR.10.7.A)
Class 3
3. No or inadequate survey of endangered and threatened
species (NR.20.1) Class 1
Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. Inadequate preparation of an EA(01.5.4.A) Class 1
2. Categorical exclusions (01.5.3A) Class 1
3. EAs not reviewed as action continues (01.5.7A) Class 1
Other Env. Issues: Noise 1. No or incomplete ICUZ study (02.1.3A) Class 1
2. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure (O2.1.10.A)
Class 3
3. No or inadequate ICUZ committee (02.1.4.A) Class 3
Other Env. Issues: IRP 1. No or inadequate removal site evaluation (03.1.2) Class
1
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(03.3.1) (i.e., noncompliance with remediation schedule)
Class 1
Other Env. Issues: P2 1. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous sub-
stances (04.10. LA) Class 3
2. Inadequate pollution prevention plan. (04.1.4.A) Class 3
3. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete
(04.5.1) Class 1
Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. No or inadequate EQCC (05.1.6A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate training for environmental personnel
(05.7.1.A) Class 3
3. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. LA) Class 3
Pesticides Mgt. 1. No comprehensive IPMP (PM. 1.4.A) Class 3
2. Pest control contracts are not adequately reviewed and
approved (PM.1.7.A) Class 3
3. Inadequate pesticide mixing/storage sites (PM.45.3.A)
Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 69
:
AMC
Topic Finding
POL Mgt. 1.
2.
3.
SPCC plan inadequate (PO.5.2) Class 1
Missing "USED OIL" label on containers other than
tanks (PO.65.6) Class 1
No or inadequate ISCP (P0.5.3.A) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1.
2.
3.
Noncompliance with state and local regulations (SO.3.1)
(i.e., open dumping; inadequate security; improper dis-
posal of biomedical waste; improper disposal of asbestos
waste in landfill; improper disposal of dried sludge)
Class 1
Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid
waste (SO. 10.1) Class 1
Inadequate solid waste storage (SO. 10.1.A) Class 3
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1.
2.
3.
Inadequate UST release detection systems (ST.65.1)
Class 1
Noncompliance with state and local regulations (ST.3.1)
(i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate secondary
containment; inadequate monitoring/inspection; inade-
quate USTs not removed) Class 1
Inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage
tanks (ST.5.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, PCB 1.
2.
No or inadequate annual PCB document log (Tl.15.1)
Class 1
No ML markings for PCB equipment (Tl.10.2) Class 1
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1.
2.
No or inadequate asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3
No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management
Han (T2.1.4A) Ocas 3
Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Incomplete radon measurements (T3.1.3A) Class 3
Toxic Substances, LBP N/A
Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WA.3.1)
(i.e., noncompliance with permit requirements; improper
70 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
AMC
Topic Finding
monitoring/inspection; unpermitted discharges; inade-
quate spill control systems; inadequate implementation
of stormwater pollution prevention plan) Class 1
2. No or noncompliance with existing state/Federal NPDES
for point source discharges (WA.10.1) Class 1
3. Inadequate analytical and sampling methods (WA. 10.5)
Class 1
Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WQ.3.1)
(i.e., incomplete records; no cross connection control pro-
gram: outdated maps of distribution system; no public
notification after violation; inadequate monitor-
ing/inspection; inadequate radiological monitoring)
Class 1
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 71
MDW
Topic Finding
Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE.3.1)
(i.e., open burning; cold cleaner lid left open; incinerator
operation violating state standard; noncompliance with
permit requirements) Class 1
2. Noncompliance with CFC/refrigerant management
requirements (Multiple) Class 1
Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate ICRMP (CR.5.1.A) Class 1
2. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National
Register (CR.5.1) Class 1
3. Inadequate long-term management of collections
(Multiple) Class 1
Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Hazardous materials containers are not labeled, tagged
or marked (HM. 1.3) HS
2. No or incomplete MSDSs (HM.1.2) HS
3. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (HM.45.1)
HS
3. Inadequate flammable storage cabinets (HM.35.4) HS
Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Inadequate characterization of wastes (HW. 10.1) Class 1
2. 90-day limit exceeded on storage of haz waste (HW.55.1)
Class 1
3. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1)
Class 1
3. No or inadequate hazardous waste training (HW.60.1)
Class 1
Natural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR. 1.3.A) Class 1
Other Environmental Issues: NEPA N/A
Other Env. Issues: Noise N/A
Other Env. Issues: IRP N/A
Other Env. Issues: P2 1. No or inadequate P2 program. (04.1.14.A) Class 3
72 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
MDW
Topic Finding
Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. No or inadequate environmental support agreements
with tenants (05.1.13.A) Class 3
2. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. l.A) Class 3
3. Inadequate communication (Multiple) Class 3
Pesticides Mgt. 1. Inadequate pesticide storage facility (PM.45.4.A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate spill control kits (PM.45.8.A) Class 3
3. Inadequate pesticide mixing/storage sites (PM.45.3.A)
Class 3
3. Noncompliance with pesticide storage requirements
(PM.45.1) Class 1
3. Unlabeled pesticide equipment (PM.45.17.A) Class 3
POL Mgt. 1. No or insufficient spill containment and cleanup materi-
als (PO.20.1) Class 1
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (PO.3.1)
(i.e., inadequate secondary containment; unpermitted
discharge) Class 1
2. Missing "USED OIL" label on containers other than
tanks (PO.65.6) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (SO.3.1)
(i.e., open dumping; improper disposal of solid sludge;
waste tire storage; inadequate inspections at landfill)
Class 1
2. Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid
waste (SO. 10.1) Class 1
3. Inadequate solid waste storage (SO. 10. l.A) Class 3
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (ST.3.1)
(i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate UST label-
ing) Class 1
2. Inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage
tanks(ST.5.1)C/ass2
Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No or inadequate PCB inventory. (Tl. 10.1) Class 1
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 73
Topic
Toxic Substances, Asbestos
Toxic Substances, Radon
Toxic Substances, LBP
MDW
Finding
1. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management
Plan(T2.1.4.A)C7ass3
2. No or inadequate asbestos survey. (T2.1.3 A) Class 3
N/A
N/A
Wastewater Mgt.
Water Quality Mgt.
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WA.3.1)
(i.e., unpermitted discharge; visible spill; incomplete
stormwater pollution prevention plan; inadequate sec-
ondary containment) Class 1
2. Discharges that would cause pass through or interfer-
ence at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1
3. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW (WA.25.2)
Class 1
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WQ.3.1)
(i.e., no cross connection control program; no contingency
plan; inadequate monitoring/inspection; incomplete re-
cordkeeping) Class 1
2. Inadequate swimming pool operations and maintenance
(WQ.4.1.A)C/ass3
3. No or inadequate records of actions taken to correct or
repair the distribution system (WQ.1.3.A) Class 3
74 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Topic
Air Emissions Mgt.
Cultural Resources Mgt.
Hazardous Materials Mgt.
Hazardous Waste Mgt.
Natural Resources Mgt.
MEDCOM
Finding
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(AE.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted sources; cold cleaner lids
left open; no vehicle emission testing) Class 1
No certification of recycling and recovery equipment.
(AE.90.1) Class 1
1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National
Register (CR.5.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate ICRMP (Multiple) Class 1
1. Hazardous materials containers are not labeled,
tagged or marked (HM.1.3) HS
2. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders
(HMA5.1) HS
3. Inadequate housekeeping in hazardous material stor-
age areas. (HM.1.4)#S
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(HW.3.1) (i.e., uncharacterized waste; improper man-
agement of hazardous waste containers; discharge to
sanitary sewer) Class 1
2. Inadequate characterization of wastes (HW.10.1)
Class 1
3. Inadequate hazardous waste storage area. (HW.80.4)
Class 1
1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR.1.3.A) Class 1
2. No or inadequate Endangered Species Management
Plan (NR.20.2.A) Class 3
3. Inadequate natural resources law enforcement per-
sonnel (NR.1.16.A) Class 3
Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. Inadequate integration of NEPA into planning.
(01.5.2.A) Class 1
Other Env. Issues: Noise N/A
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 75
MEDCOM
Topic Finding
Other Env. Issues: IRP N/A
Other Env. Issues: P2 1. Inadequate procurement of recycle content products
(04.6.1) Class 1
Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6.1.A) Class 3
2. Inadequate communication (Multiple) Class 3
Pesticides Mgt. 1. Inadequate pesticide storage (PM.45.1) Class 1
2. No DD Form 1532 completed (PM.1.6.A) Class 3
2. Unlabeled pesticide equipment (PM.45.17.A) Class 3
POL Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(PO.3.1) (i.e., inadequate labeling; visible spills; inade-
quate recordkeeping) Class 1
2. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials
(PO.20.1) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Lack of participation in state/local recycling programs
(S0.25.1.A) Class 3
1. Lack of segregation of solid waste from medical waste
(SO. 110.4) Class 1
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(ST.3.1) (i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate
inspection) Class 1
1. Inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage
tanks(ST.5.1)C7assl
Toxic Substances, PCB N/A
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or inadequate asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3
2. No or inadequate asbestos management plan
(T2.1.4.A) «ass 3
Toxic Substances, Radon N/A
76 ERDC'CERLTR-01-34
Topic
Toxic Substances. LBP
Wastewater Mgt.
Water Quality Mgt.
MEDCOM
Finding
1. No or inadequate notification of housing occupants of
potential LBP hazards (T4.10.1) Class 1
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(WA.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted discharge; noncompliance
with permit requirements; inadequate secondary con-
tainment) Class 1
2. Discharges that would cause pass through or interfer-
ence at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1
3. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW
(WA.25.2) Class 1
1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(WQ.3.1) (i.e., no distribution materials survey con-
ducted; uncertified operator; no cross connection con-
trol program) Class 1
2. No or inadequate emergency SOP (WQ.1.5.A) Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 77
r by
Top
ic f
or
W)
a fa
-u
'■£
4> o C
•2
£ o u C o 2
1
ca
1 cu SM
13 o o
u o o>
-4J c3
+J CO
CD
CO
H <!
CO
C ©
'42
CD
i- 4) c ca CD
'o o
i
a '5
- CD ft O U ft s C CD
ft O
«2 c o
'42 ca - CD ft o
o
ca In CD
C 3
co" fi O
'co CO
£ CD
4) _> '42
■a
CO CD
■~
fi o CO
CD
£ •- CD ft
4)
ca
cr 4)
"Ü ca c
'S) C
'ft CD 4)
O o 4) U
■ft ft ca o +J
4) •- _d
'3 fa T
itle
V p
erm
its.
(AE
.1.2
)
r-i oi
-fi a CD
£ X) i
i •- o
ca •~ CD
_C 'u C
c 1
(0 p*
a> o C •2
CD lp
13 u o
i—I
CO
CD
S-, CD
CD
-PJ
a SH
4)
ft s O u c o
£ 4) ft
T3 ca
_fi
en"
b£ c 'fi
J2
c CD ft o
4)
ST fi
(0 o (0 o
d • PH
'S ti
• PH
fa
a. S o u C o 2
13 fi 03
4)
ca co
CO C
ca
fi ca CD
'S u
ft C s fi 4) ft O
co" 4) o
fi o CO
J3
CD O
C ca
fi 4)
£ 4) S-
'3 cr
ca ■-
+J
4)
CO
cr
u 4) ft O SH
ft £
c _o '42 ca ■~ 4) ft O
4) ■ — -fi ft
•fi ^ be PH
.5 8 LL o o r-i
£ ~
Ü cu 4 i«
rfi
& 4)
CD CO CD u SM
o CO
TJ CD -u
s CD
ft c 3
4) C I
i CD
T3 ca
_fi
en" C o
"m
i 4)
ca
a- 4)
T3 ca
£? o
LU
c >-
«so
PH • pH
fa
4> u
c .2 "a. £ o
13 o o
T3 C ca CD
ca CO
r-1
CO
CO
fi
CO
T>
S* 4) c ca 4)
C !- fi
-Q
C 4) ft O
O CJ 4)
4)
ca
cr
> '42 •a «3 b£ c
CO
fi o
'en CO
£ CD
CD
o '-fi
ca t, bD 4)
c fi ® 3 CO
R fi
c LL c
o 2
o •l-P
r2 2
CJ
c 4) ft O
-fi ca
_fi ft CD CD
en
£ CD
ca fi cr
fi CD > ° 5 u ft
> "O E
<
1—1
c ■ ■■■
<*
rfi
"5 3 be 4>
CD CO
fi _©
'cQ CO
e 0)
+1»
£ T3 4)
1
4)
i en
£ 4)
^ r2
0 >
s 4>
a en
i—i ca cj o
1—1
CO
H
CD
ft c
ft X! 4)
ca fi cr
S-t
'3 ^3
o
CD CD u
fi ca ^^ ■i^ be < T) £
4) ft >
CD
+3
t-l CD > c CO
C _o 'to
•r- 4)
Q.
o <
0
d -3 d fa
ft S o o fi o 2
C ca
ca CO
en a o
'42 a
ca fi cr CD
T3 ca c
C o
fi CD > fi
fi O CO
TJ 4)
co
£ 4) ft
ca
!- O
o 2
CN
<
* 'S e 4> fi fe CJ S-c
fi 2 O pfi
2 ^
|2 JC T-i CN CO
■ ■ £ ■&
Li. ■s o CO
X 3 0
•P* fi o
■ ■■■ in 0 CO
■Ö pd H CO
s c Tf
0 Q.
05
<
a <
78 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
j>> CD 1 ■
o 0 u C
"E cu In 03
cr
CD
s 0)
< i—i
in
0) be
c 03 c
i 03 N
'5 a be
o
-3 cu
03 3 cr
u 3 tn tn cu
'-+3
tn
•Ee CD
OS
be 03
a> a)
3 00 cu 5 5
p. ^"s cu
T3 •- CD
cd i—i
o "1 Ö • PH
C
fa
"a o H 03 -a 03 <| C3 ft e o cj c o
55
'S, £ o o
o
ft u Ü
<
o ft
3 cr cu
T3 03 c
c 03
c cu E
ft O c
_o
IM
T—i
OS o
C
o o 2
o
ft
o
•3 OS cd cj
cu 5
CM T—i CM
i 1
3 en ft ■~
i > —
£ cr> -o o
CU C75
« < c w cu 3 tn
cr >=H
tn
IS tn
I-i
in
OS o
0-'
OS a i—i
cu , be cd
IM g
a • PH
fa
03 3 03
s 0)
03 3 cr CD
T3 03 3
I—t
N
'3 3 be ■~, o
13 3 03 -u 3 CD
s
s_ o
<u p. cd ft O
3 o • --
<; CM
r-i
0) -*J 03 3 cr CD
13 03 c
o o
55
E 3 ft
"3 «H c o tn
.1 tn
CM
in
s p 03
'~ cu o o
55
o CJ cu
-o C cd be
_C
o CD •-
c cu 3
_ft '3 cr CD
u cu
Ö
<
.3
5 03 u
-*J ■~ cu o o
55
cu > o o cu '—
c 03
cu be
cu
CD
cd 3 cr cu
03 _c u o o
55
3 tn
tn cu
t CD
ft O u ft u
•E o
"Go cu
OS
15 c
_o '■3
03
1 cu >
rH
in OS o c CD
CU
03 3 O4
CU 13
03 C
o o
<5
03 N c '5
CD O
03 13 3 C er cd
^ 3
£ £
<M CO CO CO i-i (M CO
U o -u cd u O ft o
I- o +J tn
i CD
i tn
i 1 J3 3 1
03 SH
a) _S 'Ö 3
E o o 3 o c
e SM
cu ft tn
+-> 3
0) +J 03 3 cr CD
ft E 3 ft
%
be 03 C 03
E CD
03 N
"c 03 be
o
s C8
c cu E
s •- cu
13 cu
-»-3 03 3 cr cu
3 tn
tn CD
Vi
'be cu
OS 'a T—1
C
03
o be c
•E 3
13
cd
s. tn ^v
8 w
T3 •FH
fa
o -M 03 s-l CD
C 'o
s- 0) a o
£
Ö _o '•3 03 u tu a. o
cu u 3
■2 "a.
s
3
a>
13 03
_S
o o
55
a c o tn
en
CN
in in
CO
3 cr cu
Cd
c
ft C3
ft "o c o
<
<
■a 03 c t- o o
55
cu ft o
ft o
•E o
c o
+3
cu >
in OS o
c CD
-t-3
tn C o o o 2
O
CO CD
,3
o OS
2 if 5 3
IN CO i-i CM
tn
< tn i IS ■^ cu CD u ^ CD
T—1
<M
03 3 cr
in OS
cu
03
•E ft
5t- O -u C CD
E
"■6 cu ft
CD
3 3
CO +j
in § OS CT
be $
CU •a
03
Ü o
ft >>
cd
-a c fa
tn C
_o
G
u o o
55
r-!
OH'
S PS Ü 1—t
o u ft ft 03 a
cu be C3 3 a £
o •E o tn
^3
13 CU o
cd
tn 3 bo 7 .3 o •% ° 5 55
CO
tn cu o t.
Ö 3 o
• 1-1 tn a 0)
0 K H i—i
CO
3 ■(->
"5 ü
ERDC/CERL TR-01-34 79
bc d
S3
50 .05
bt ö
d
tu d
■ PH
d
o> bc cö C
2 0
cö 3 O" 01
-3 03 3
CO
ft o s-,
u •c
c 3 >>
■3 Cü
o
t2 c*—
03
CO
in
bo 3
3
01 T3
o £ ■-
Cü
& cö ft
«<—i
o 3 o ü
2 W
-§ ö cö
o o
CO
ü
CD CJ
3 cö
3 ÖD
*" i—!
13 CN In 03
T) CD
fr.
33 r3
03 3 o
«4-
o 01 bo cö
CM
bc •>*
cu »n 03 03 03
CÖ
3 er
CÖ
3
t-, o
03 •- Cü
'S ° .s z
o cj
CÖ N CÖ
.3 3 Oi
■c
bc o i. & 3 o
*-3 cö CJ
'S 3 e
Cü o 3 .2
e o ü 3 o
3 bc o) ^ >-. ,_*-
'S CQ
Cü 2 01 fr !- 0)
T3 3
o 3
ffl
N s* T1 3 cö 03
Xi 03 <1) C+-c O CÖ
CÖ r/3 1——<
IH Cü CD +J rt CÖ +■>
'm s u Cü
3 o 03
3 r>
o U
03
3
o CO
'S H bc 2 CÖ pH
o 0) bc cö s- o
u Cü a o u ft s
>> CJ
03 CÖ bc
o> 03 03 0) In ft
lO
ffi
03 u Cü
T) 3
cö ,3 'S
Cü CJ
3 3
o CJ
3 o
CÖ <N
03 2 T3
03 fr
ffi
Cü
,3
o Cü bc cö
•-Ö S
CJ
03 CÖ bc -3 cü 03 03 Cü ■-.
ft £ o CJ
E
03 SH
Cü
3
T3
cö N 3
,C <+- o 03 >H
Cü
3
3 o ü
o 3 Cü u cö
cö ■c
Cü
cö
6 03
3 o
-3 03
"ÖS -Q cö
03
cö
o
'S H bc 2
3 HH
co
(1) 3 +J n CÖ
o cö
's cü +J S -4J m s—\ CÖ r: r-< 3 3 er 03 S
Cü
CJ
o 1—1
CJ CJ cö
T3 cö 3 §
i—« "3 co
oq
-a Cü
Cü 0) o X Cü
• 3 LO
.s £
T3 03
T3 03 03 u X 03
CO
CO
o
cö 3 er 0)
-3 3 3
3 _o '■Ö cö N
•c 03
CJ 3 - 3
JS
3 bc 03
— CO CÖ ^
K ^ ^ E w ft T3 ^
03 03
03 CÖ
o CJ
3 o
3 cö
CJ cö
o 3
I-H
C-3
3 o ' ' o i—1 -t->
SH UJ o •4J
3 £ 3 OJ
cö 3
•c 03
ffi S 3 o
er CJ 03 o 03 m 0) cö
T3 cö 3
I—1
cö
CJ
03 CÖ
L5 CO
T3 03
03 03 CJ X 03
S • .3 in
•S ^'
cö 3 cr cü
-3 cö 3
03 CJ
3 cö
3 o
bc d
■i-i
d
i CD
^ 03 ra 'Eö 03 01 03 in
Cü ft O LH ft CJ
•c o
3 3 o
Z in
CJ cu o u ft 0) IH
IC 03 3 3 er 03
3 3
in co
s 3
u a 3 o
CD S
3i w y Cö 03
3
e o
03 CÖ 03 IH 3 03 bc CÖ
03 CJ
3 .2 'ft S o CJ
3 o
S3
CN
3 bo 03
CÖ CN
03
73 03 fr in 03
r3
K
03
CÖ
& « 03 rH
1 s s* o
«4-1
o
ü cö
03
co Q co
o
o CD -U CÖ
3 er 03
X! CO 3
<*H ^-^ o i—i 3 3 ö o
•l-H o i—i «i
-t-> cö ^ 3
V 03
K s w 3
CJ 03
m 03 cö
cfl ri
03 CÖ §
CJ ■s CO
CD
03 CD
X Cü
3 1—1
in ^™ r^ 3 ^ o ft K
0) CJ 3
• 2 "ft s o CJ
3 o
S3
o H
ft 03 3 Cfi o In
3
3 0) N -M CÖ CÖ
SU S
03 3 o
T) !H 3 N 3 ft
80 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
ISC a
• PH
C
fa on s
tora
ge
of h
az
was
te. (
HW
.55.
1)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
INR
MP
. (N
R.1
.3.A
)
2.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(N
R.3
.1)(
i.e.
,
inad
equat
e er
osio
n
cont
rol; s
tate
lis
ted
endan
ger
ed s
peci
es)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
surv
ey o
f en
dan
ger
ed
and t
hre
aten
ed s
pe-
cies
. (
NR
.20.
1)
«0
bo a
a fa m
anag
emen
t of
90-
day
sto
rag
e si
te;
un
-
char
acte
rize
d w
aste
;
imp
rop
er m
anag
e-
men
t of
haz
ard
ou
s
was
te c
onta
iner
s; i
n-
com
plet
e m
anif
ests
)
3.
90-
day
lim
it e
xcee
ded
on s
tora
ge
of h
azar
d-
ous
was
te.
(HW
.55.
1)
1.
Lac
k of
or
inad
equat
e
INR
MP
. (N
R.1
.3.A
)
2.
Cu
rren
t st
atu
s of
on-
goin
g ag
reem
ents
or
enfo
rcem
ent
acti
ons
not
exam
ined
.
(NR
.1.1
)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
surv
ey o
f en
dan
ger
ed
and t
hre
aten
ed s
pe-
cies
. (
NR
.20.
1)
3.
Flo
odpla
ins
and w
et-
lands
are
not
iden
ti-
1»
c •1-1
C
fa stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
on
s.
(HW
.3.1
)
(i.e
., im
pro
per
lab
el-
ing;
unch
arac
teri
zed
was
te;
imp
rop
er s
at-
elli
te a
ccum
ula
tion
po
int
des
ignat
ion;
in-
adeq
uat
e in
spec
tio
ns)
1.
Lac
k or
inad
equat
e
INR
MP
. (N
R.1
.3.A
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
surv
ey o
f en
dan
ger
ed
and t
hre
aten
ed s
pe-
cies
. (N
R.2
0.1)
3.
(NR
.1.5
.A)
fa stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(HW
.3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e se
c-
ondar
y c
onta
inm
ent;
inad
equat
e la
beli
ng;
unre
gis
tere
d a
ccum
u-
lati
on a
reas
; in
com
-
ple
te m
anif
ests
; in
-
adeq
uat
e tr
ainin
g)
1.
Lan
d m
anag
emen
t
op
erat
ion
s n
ot
per-
form
ed c
on
sist
ent
wit
h m
od
ern c
onse
r-
vat
ion a
nd l
and u
se
pri
nci
ple
s.
(NR
.10.
7.A
)
2.
Lac
k of
or
inad
equ
ate
INR
MP
. (N
R.1
.3.A
)
3.
Insu
ffic
ient
vege
ta-
tiv
e co
ver
to c
ontr
ol
du
st a
nd e
rosi
on
dam
age.
(NR
.10.
9.A
)
•>*
0 H
Nat
ura
l R
eso
urc
es
Mgt
.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 81
S 1.
I
nad
equat
e m
anag
e-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tio
n o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(01
.1.2
.A)
1.
EA
not
pro
duce
d
when
nee
ded.
(01
.5.2
)
2.
Inad
equat
e or
lac
k of
imple
men
tati
on o
f
NE
PA
. (0
1.1
.3.A
)
3.
No
or i
nco
mple
te
pre
par
atio
n o
f an
EA
.
(01.
5.4.
A)
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te
ICU
Z s
tudy.
(02
.1.3
.A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e as
-
sess
men
t of
the
effe
ct
of n
oise
. (0
2.1.
5.A
)
CO
IDC
C
fied
/pro
tect
ed.
(NR
.10.
2)
1.
NE
PA
not
inte
gra
ted
into
pla
nnin
g.
(01.5
.1)
2.
Inad
equat
e m
anag
e-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(01.
1.2.
A)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
pre
par
atio
n o
f an
EA
.
(01.
5.4.
A)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICU
Z s
tudy.
(02.
1.3.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICU
Z c
omm
itte
e.
(02.
1.4.
A)
10
a T3 Ö
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
pre
par
atio
n o
f an
EA
.
(01.
5.4.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
in-
tegra
tion o
f en
viro
n-
men
tal
revi
ew w
ith
pla
nn
ing a
nd d
eci-
sion
-mak
ing.
(01.
5.2.
A)
3.
NE
PA
not
inte
gra
ted
into
pla
nnin
g.
(01.5
.1)
3. C
ateg
oric
al e
xclu
-
sion
s (0
1.5.
3.A
)
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
ICU
Z s
tudy
.
(02.
1.3.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICU
Z c
omm
itte
e.
(02.
1.4.
A)
be s
C
1.
Cat
ego
rica
l ex
clu-
sion
s.
(01.
5.3.
A)
2.
NE
PA
not
inte
gra
ted
into
pla
nnin
g.
(01.5
.1)
2.
EA
s not
revi
ewed
as
acti
on c
onti
nues
.
(01.
5.7.
A)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICU
Z s
tudy
.
(02.
1.3.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICU
Z c
omm
itte
e.
(02.
1.4.
A)
0 H
Oth
er E
nvir
on-
men
tal
Issu
es:
NE
PA
Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
Noi
se
82 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
05
bjo a
S3
.05
bx Ö
• PH
S3
05
be
05
be
a
o H
CO
3 cr a»
03
c
o o
55
CO
a o CJ
<D en 'o c
3
cu c o
—< 3 a -a
« < C _J
_C
o o
55
cj
3 CU
CO
O
o E
o> -a cc c .te o
cu t£ c3 C 03
s 3 cr CÜ
C3
C
i 1 c o F n C3
s-, o CD
o u cu
4-1
to C o
CM
O
T3 c 03
3 < CM
CO
3 cr
d
"öl CO
o o ^H 01 - ^""
C
£ c o
CO
o 'U
CS c 'S *—' HH +J
CO
'o s
Ö 03
3 CT o>
13 s
.3
o o
55
CO
o
a
CO '_l
£ w
o o 01 s- 3
"Ö 01 Ü
CD 3
« 3 3 -5 cr ca
c o o c o
55
b£ ■£, ,j_r
2 p o CS CO -Q
T3 c CS
3 3
3 o
en 0>
"3 0>
3
'-2 CO 01 > 3
0) 3 "" 3
0) tX 3
0) ^N
£ 3 tuO .2 3
•c o
'S o
3 3 cr cu 3
_B
I« o o
55
CM
3 > CU
CO
O
3 N ^ 3 ITt 3 •-
o
£ 3 tx o Co cu
+J u. 3 -3 3 3 3 a cr 3 «« o> o
T3 CS
3
3 a) 3
3 o
cu ■ a 3
0> C in
ti—i 3
o a i cu cu
4J CO
_3 15 > cu o>
'en
13 > o £
cu s cu -t-3 no cu o
3 _o
< O) ^ f ^ 3 3 cr CM
3 3 cr
en en cu
CO
"3 o 3
3 rr
CO 0)
"a 3 en
CO
3 o
cu u 3 's
1—1
CO
cu -3
CS
3
•- o o
55
CO
o 3 O
'-£3
01 T3 3 C u o o
55
CO 3
3 3
'S CU
s cu U
•3 3 3
3 _o '5 3
.bo '-C en cu >
a) "S 3
_S
SH
o o
55
01
3 cu
E J2 "3. 6
CO
o
55
E o o C
u o o
55
o -t-J
0)
'5 > 3
3 3
E !- CU -u 01
T3
< in
T—i
CO
O
.2 "a E o u 3 o
55
T3 3 S 01
CS
CO
CO
o en 3 o
s
oo co
cu 'O 3
_S
u o o
55
CM
2- O
CU I*
3 -d
cu o
be _c 'B 01 Öl
3 3 cr « a c
CD en 3 +J tn 3 a •-
c2
to cu Ü c 3 +J en
,£> 3 tn co 3 o
•3
3
a> a cu u. 3 u
o* ^ 4) O
3 3
co O
T3 3
_B
k. o o
55
CM
3 _o '■£ 3 3
s 3
3 cu
m co P o
fe g -•
cu tc 3 3 3
6
CM 0!
3 o l. o
3 3 cr cu
T3 3
-3 3 3
-*J 3 cu s
3 _o '^ 3 N
'S 3
M
O
CO
O
3 3 cr cu
T3
£ & o .5
tn cu cu co CO
3
a 55 a
■a CU
CO
O
c _o
3
co cu >
s 3 a* cu
T3 S C
CO
o
o o
55
CO
CD
3 to en
> 3
cu OH
o S
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 83
c T«H i r» +3
SH o LO
bo CO
3 4-
1
TJ .2 3 CD > CD
CD
as 3
O 3 3
£ s CO be
o CO 3 o o
'a CN
be Ö 3
0) TJ
CO
6 3 3
o TJ 3
a> a cd ft <
0
cd
3 =*H o
LO
rr" O
S • PN
+3 3
■—<
"3 PH
3 CO
u E o u
cr <u
TJ 3 s
cd +J 3 o> £
St— O
3 _o +3
CN
i—i
o
er 01
-d cd C
s _o
cd SH
01
CO CD
_> '■+3
CN CO
0) , bo cd cd N c 'S
E be
cd 3 cr CD
-d cd 3
TJ c cd
-4-» a 0)
4H
o
SH CD a cd ft
3 cd
cd ■c ft o u ft ft cd Ö
3 o SH
'> C CD
c CD
£ Ol bo cd
bo c
-3 c
.3
to .OS
a • PH
d • PH
«5 .A
toe Ö
• PN
TJ S3
Ö _©
+3 ö 01 > 01 SH
ft 3 o
o OH
^ , 01 i—l CD t
SH o LO
be m
cd N 4-
3 cd 'So
0) -4-» cd 3 er 01
O
CD
c cd
B CD
c cd bo •~ o
SH
O
s- 01 ft
cd 3 cr CD
co o u 0)
Id > CD
Ö
o ro a
rC u cl)
TJ cd TJ cd < m o *rH -w
cd 3 3 ft ri >> co CD c bo
c U. er cd t*-i CN o
s cd
1—H ft © u .3
CD TJ cd
s ►—1
3 CD
s
o 3
_o '+3 o
o o
55 «4-C o "cd Ö cd
CO
3 o SH
o LO cd
•c Ö ti) M* 01 0) > 3 O cd 01 SH
3 rr1 S
ft 01 rn
ö o
TJ cd rl
01 r—1 ft
3 o
TJ -M 3 C
s cd o N
o a, cd CD cd ft c X
o C
Ö CD
E 0) bo cd C cd
3 cd
TJ CD u 01
'co c o
T) N
cd s cd Ö CN u
43 en O
S Ö i-H
3 cd
01
CO cd
■e cd ft
o ft £ o o
cd
ho
CO 3 o
a 3 o
3 bo CD LH
13 M 0)
01
M 01
43
CN
o
CN CO
CD i bo 3 cd N ß 'S 2 § E bo <U o
-t-> _~ 3 -a 3 3 cr 3
Cd rn 3 c
■-
O
^ i- CD ft 3 ft
e*-. o 3 o
bo 3
TJ 3
,3 +J CU ^ 3 3
< 0) S CN 5*3
3 ■4-3
i—l e*H 3
C/J
LO 13 o 3 3
H-1 « LO
o
3 CD
0 -n 3 3 cr 0)
T3 3
_B
w O
o
CN
01 bo 3 3 3 3 3 i- ^ 3. bo oi 3
-4-> _~ 3 TJ 3 3 cr 3 CD ^
N ^
X) 3 3
o
01 ft 3 ft O ,-H
ho 3
'S 3
eH
< .2
ho 3
Ü 3 r-| e*3 3 CO 3
co CD
T3 3 3
LO
O
cd 3 CT <D
"Ö 3
_C
i- O o
55
.Si
tu c
Ö
o H
3 01 VH -n o
ho Ö
3 ■E 01
ft E o CD a
o o
CO CD 3 co co
> 3 H M Ol
r3
3 co co 3 o
-a 3 N 3
r3
o 3 •-
3 01
s 0) bo 3 3 3
co 3 o
TJ SH 3 N 3
3 3
TJ 01 M CD
TJ '35 3 o CJ
TJ
3 N 3
43 Ci—I O
3 ft
13 bJD
3 ^5
.5 < 3 CN
co 3
co 3 O
O
o 3
TJ O M ft
TJ Ol M 3 o o H
P-.
CO
> o o CD
O
e^—i
0) TJ 3
co 3
s < 'S LO M r-i cu 5; s- O 0) w
01 bo 3 3
3 3
3
3 cr 01
TJ 3 3
co CD 3 co
U
be
Ä < T3 3 o 3 co 3 bo SH
CD
3 cr CD
i—i
LO' e2
bo ft y-*. T> o 3 t-i
TJ 3 3
3 ft V- o
< CN
i-i
3 .3
SH
.2 'G ^4—
e*H 3 CO
3 <D
E 3 o
'-*3
LO
o O
o 55
3 CO 3
M
TJ 3 3
CN
CO +J i—i fab
CN PL,
> 3
SH CD
43 +-> o
3 SH ho o SH
PH
84 ERDGCERLTR-01-34
be C
t> XI
I® c ** -) L «C
-u W) 3 a 0
• PH u TJ 5s
a 3 i*H en I* Ö
CD rH
be 3
5 «
Xt C 3
CO
in O
3 3 cr cu
-o 3 C
■- ©
o 2
t> id O
3 to 3 a-
cu XI 3 C
in O
CO
o o 2
CO
O
<
a; ^
§ CU
2 £3
en cu P.
CO 3 cr 4)
T3 3 C
>>
1 ** Si § 2 *=
cu =
cu •3
4> a
a 3 CT cu
XS CO C
en
be
* < 3 CO
-e CU
4)
2 3 a* 4>
-3 CO
_c
o o 2
-3 C CO
a. en
CO
•c cu eO 3 _
a 3 c
.0)
be a
a
- o a a 3 tn
C CD
s o
-= CO
a . w in © O
4) > en 3 CU
4>
a £ o o o 2
< 41
TT 3
:: §• 3 4> S5 -3 *—' 3 w C
CU S cu
o o 2
o o
3 4)
6 4) fcC CO c 3 E en CU a
CO
4) O 3 3
O o 3 o 2 CO
4) IH
4) be 3 l* O
-4-> en
4) XS
en 4) a
en
£ s E S
■g S
CU -3
CO 3 rr +J en 0) 3 3
TO 4) •r 3 h a; C 3 CO
o 3 3
E a 7—1
o o 3 3
Ö CM
a 3 'a
en
3 CU
W < s CO
r-i in
be O a • f-<
13 O a O •H
CU X) G 3 o en
41 4) 3 4) <
o bn
CU a >> 3
-1 O ad 3 _C
hr ^ ^.^ CT r3 in o X 3
t2
tu < CD T-l
a en
Tf CD E -*J 3
CD
E CD •~
"3 a-
Tf 3 4) § 3 3 a- cu
-3 3 3 **
4) CD
E o 2
CU be 3 u o en
m
CU
S
s-, O o 2
-3 'G '-£ en 4) P.
CU_
en
^3
3 'G +3 en CD ft
S " in
s
3 3 cr CD
-3 3 3
X) 3 3
C CU
C
'cfl
u 41
- .3 co •- o
3
3 o
en
3 3 CO cu
.05
be a
a
OH o
CO
in O
tn CD
^_, 1
O
CD *~V +i <: > <J JS I-H cu C
3 CU
CU
a E o
s CL,
i i-H o en CD
-3
o «2 bo _£
'en en
Ö
X) 4)
X! 3
in
cu
3 3 cr 4)
X) 3 C
E 4)
CO
C 3
CU o f= o i- £ o o 2 CU
1—1
en CD
CU
~a3 be 3
o C
o cu
o o 2
tn CD P.
CO
u o +-> 3 c
X)
o
ft
tn CD xi
en 4)
CU
o 3 41
^^ CO
3 rH CT
~ in CU TO o be 3
o > O 3
<1) 3 CM s_ be S-H
s—' o u c d_ 3 W o X a a> A:
3 o
S o 03 3
ft
o PH
ERDC/CERL TR-01-34 85
0> 0)
■Q ■~ CD Xi et) es <i) CO k.
ij -fi o
c o a
o CD
'S ?*> HH CD m
ttt O Q
k. CD e '3
cä
C CD
0) SH
s e 3
i—i
ö i—i
d PH
o
• pH
Ö • pH
co
o
c o o
c o
cö
fi es
CD
O PH
'G .3
o
3 CO
fi
a
es e o
■& a>
co <35
c • PH
Ö •PH
in 0S
bfl C
• PH
nö Ö
•IN
CN CO
O Q co p bc C
.3 2
CD k
c
c o cj
c o
fi cS -u fi CÖ
rfi -4->
SH
0> nfi
CD o fi CÖ
cö n
8 p
CD
CÖ
fi
co id co
O PH
S rt PH fi3 ft fl ^ n, fi c . CD o u c o
CD
C o
rfi >
fi O u
& CÖ
C o u 0) CD
CS
fi
0>
CS
3 O* 01
XJ CÖ fi
bß PH c co ft 01 01 ^ ki O cj Ol kl
01
CÖ
er 5^ a> in
CÖ c
O PH
CM CO
ü O PH CO
CÖ
fi> <N
es fi
CN
fi bß CD SH
o PH
fi CÖ
C CÖ
o PH
CD
C o
CD -o
CÖ c co" fi
ß o CJ
fr es
TJ fi O CJ CD
ft S O o c o ß
> er
u ^^ CD +-> ft fi . «
-±3 fl £ 01
s-, CD 3 u C <1> cö s-
•fi bo * S CD __,
c cö
CÖ w
8 Q ;ß — co ft -fi w
c o 2
CD
fi o
CD bß cö in o
CD ki
SH o ft CD C CÖ «H
+3 kl CD ft o SH ft £
c CD ft O
CD CÖ
o fi o
es fi er CD •fi es
_e
bc c
3 -fi
cö Q.
CD bc es - o CD
CD CD es CD •- bß
es 3 er CD
cö
4> — CD "^ fi cö
3 bß 01 ki
~ CO
o cj fi o
-fi C cö CD
c _o '-C co
0) -fi CÖ
c •FH
TJ CD
fi
o o fi
kl o
•r-l
fi o
es 3
CD ■3 es ß
fi _o '■Ö u 41 ft CD a
c
CD
ft E fi CD
cö 3
CD T3 3
^C
cu u C eö fi CD
Oi p5
4) ,_,
fi 3
CÖ PO
O ;s ~ co
o CJ
C o
c 3 fi
O
3
in C 3
13 CD
s kl 01 ft fi fi
3 T3
3 bß CD ki ki 01 ft o - ft
3
"es cj
'S CD
s
3 3 CT CD
T3 3 C
CÖ CD O ft
C o fi of bß 3 ki o
CD CD 3 CD ki bß
3 3 CD- CD
"Ü 3 ß
C CD
5 S ."S CD
* • =
"I* .05
bfl S
• FH
U • pH
o H
T3 C 3 jj CD
g l s s
.S o
c o CJ
ft CD
ft 3 fi 3 CD
01 i bß 3 3 N c '3 S bß oi o
e 3
3 3 er CD
"Ö 3 ß
•Jsi SH
o
01 ft 3 ft
H-H o ß o
01 cj ß 3
oi ,—, kl rH
"es W
d
O
"3 CD O
ft
T3 fi 3 •-
.s >; 5 - M ^
o PH
o cj fi o
ti
CD 3
'S co
T3 fi 3 CD
C
3
ki CD ft O ki ft
CD bß
TJ 3
-d
o CD
•c 3 cj 0) CD
CD
3 3 er
fi CD
CD bß 3 Ö 3 Ä S J3 k, T3 CD c ft cö O i—i
ft o
CD i bc 3 3 C 3
6 4)
3 3 er CD
CS
c
C 3 bß ki o
fi 3
fi CD
86 ERDC/CERL TR-01-34
05
d
fl
tion i
n s
tate
/loca
l re
-
cycl
ing
pro
gra
ms.
(S0.2
5.1
.A)
3.
Lac
k of
seg
regat
ion o
f
recy
clab
le m
ater
ials
from
sol
id w
aste
.
(SO
. 10.
1)
3.
In
adeq
uat
e so
lid
was
te s
tora
ge.
(SO
.lO
.l.A
)
1.
Inad
equ
ate
US
T r
e-
leas
e det
ecti
on s
ys-
tem
s.
(ST
.65.
1)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(ST
.3.1
)(i.
e.,
inad
equat
e U
ST l
a-
beli
ng;
inad
equat
e
spil
l/ov
erfl
ow p
rote
c-
tion
; in
adeq
uat
e
fl • PH
fl E im
pro
per
dis
po
sal
of
regula
ted m
edic
al
was
te;
was
te t
ire
stora
ge;
inad
equat
e
clos
ure
pla
n)
2.
Inad
equat
e se
gre
ga-
tion
of
recy
clab
le m
a-
teri
als
from
sol
id
was
te.
(SO
. 10.
1)
3.
No
np
arti
cip
atio
n i
n
stat
e/lo
cal
recy
clin
g
pro
gra
ms.
(S0.2
5.1
.A)
1.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu
-
lati
ons.
(ST
.3.1
)(i.
e.,
unre
gis
tere
d s
tora
ge
tan
ks;
inad
equat
e
seco
ndar
y c
onta
in-
men
t; i
nad
equ
ate
spil
l/ov
erfl
ow d
etec
-
tion
)
2.
Inad
equ
ate
US
T
iß
fl 'S fl
inad
equ
ate
met
han
e
monit
ori
ng;
was
te
tire
sto
rage;
asb
esto
s
disp
osal
in l
andf
ill;
open
dum
pin
g)
2.
No
np
arti
cip
atio
n i
n
stat
e/lo
cal
recy
clin
g
pro
gra
ms.
(S0.
25.1
.A)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(ST
.3.1
)(i.
e.,
un
reg
iste
red s
tora
ge
tanks;
in
adeq
uat
e re
-
cord
keep
ing;
inad
e-
quat
e se
condar
y c
on-
tain
men
t; i
nad
equat
e
mon
itor
ing;
ina
de-
quat
e U
ST
s)
&
fl 'S fl
tion o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(S0.1
.2.A
)
3.
Inad
equat
e se
greg
a-
tion o
f re
cycl
able
ma-
teri
als
from
sol
id
was
te.
(SO
. 10.
1)
1.
Mis
sing "
US
ED
OIL
"
lab
el o
n A
ST
s.
(ST
. 125
.1)
2.
Inad
equat
e sp
ill
over
-
fill p
rote
ctio
n f
or s
ub-
stan
dar
d U
ST
s.
(ST
.30.
1A)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
US
T c
lo-
sure
. (S
T.9
5.3)
O •i-i CM 0 H
ti 03
3 ca
EH o> bo ca u o
CO
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 87
l>
a •rH
C • PH
fa seco
ndar
y c
on
tain
-
men
t)
3.
In
adeq
uat
e m
anag
e-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(ST
.1.2
.A)
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
an-
nual P
CB d
ocu
men
t
log.
(Tl.
15
.1)
2.
No
ML m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B e
quip
men
t.
(Tl.
10.2
)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
PC
B
item
s st
ora
ge
area
s.
(Tl.
40.2
)
3. I
nad
equ
ate
man
age-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(T1.
1.2.
A)
3. I
nad
equ
ate
stora
ge
area
s fo
r P
CB i
tem
s
conta
inin
g g
reat
er
«0
tec Ö
•PH
c fa re
leas
e det
ecti
on s
ys-
tem
s.
(ST
.65.
1)
3.
Subst
andar
d U
ST
s
no
t upgra
ded
, cl
osed
,
or r
emov
ed.
(ST
.25.
1)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e an
-
nual
PC
B d
ocu
men
t
log.
(Tl.
15.1
)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egula
-
tion
s.
(Tl.
2.1
)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
PC
B
item
s st
ora
ge
area
s.
(Tl.
40
.2)
two ö
•TH
d •PH
fa
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e se
c-
on
dar
y c
onta
inm
ent
for
bu
lk s
tora
ge
tan
ks.
(ST
.5.1
)
3.
Inad
equat
e U
ST
re-
leas
e de
tect
ion
sys-
tem
s.
(ST
.65.
1)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e an
-
nual
PC
B d
ocum
ent
log.
(Tl.
15.1
)
2.
No
ML
mar
kin
gs
for
PC
B e
quip
men
t.
(Tl.
10.2
)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
PC
B
item
s st
ora
ge
area
s.
(Tl.
40.2
)
be a
•i-i
d fa
1.
No
ML m
ark
ing
s fo
r
PC
B e
quip
men
t.
(Tl.
10.2
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e an
-
nual
PC
B d
ocum
ent
log.
(Tl.
15.1
)
3.
(T1.
1.2.
A); I
nad
e-
qu
ate
>50
ppm
PC
Bs
and
PC
B i
tem
s st
or-
age
area
s.
(Tl.
40.1
)
0 H
Tox
ic S
ub
stan
ces,
PC
B
88 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
l>
be Ö
Ö fa th
an o
r eq
ual t
o
50pp
m.
3.
In
adeq
uat
e oper
a-
tional
pro
cedure
s at
PC
B s
tora
ge
area
s.
(Tl.
40
.4)
«3
1.
Inco
mple
te r
ado
n
mea
sure
men
ts.
(T3.
1.3.
A)
2.
(T3.
1.8.
A)
c X! C
fa
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te a
s-
bes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e In
-
stal
lati
on
Asb
esto
s
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n.
(T2.
1.4.
A)
3.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egula
-
tion
s.
(T2.
2.1)
1.
Rad
on m
easu
rem
ents
not
per
form
ed.
(T3.
1.3.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
to
c
C • PH
fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e In
-
stal
lati
on
Asb
esto
s
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n.
(T2.
1.4.
A)
2.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e as
-
bes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
A)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
man
age-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion
of
pap
erw
ork
.
(T2.
1.2.
A)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(T3.
3.1)
(i.e
.,
inad
equat
e ra
do
n r
e-
be C
d fa
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te
asbes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
A)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e In
-
stal
lati
on
Asb
esto
s
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n.
(T2.
1.4.
A)
3.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
iden
tifi
cati
on o
f th
e
exis
ten
ce,
exte
nt
and
cond
itio
n of
all a
sbes
-
tos.
(T2.
1.6.
A)
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
mit
igat
ion o
f st
ruc-
ture
s.
(T3.
1.12
.A)
2.
Rad
on m
easu
rem
ents
o •1-1
OH 0 H
Tox
ic S
ub
stan
ces,
Asb
esto
s
Tox
ic S
ubst
ance
s,
Rad
on
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 89
05
be =
-0 ti
• pH
fa
3.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h
stat
e/lo
cal
regula
-
tions
(T3.
3.1)
(i.e
., no
radon r
educt
ion p
ro-
gra
m d
ocu
men
ta-
tion
).
«0
be g
'S c •H
fa post
-mit
igat
ion s
am-
plin
g.
(T3.
1.13
.A);
No
or i
nad
equat
e w
ritt
en
radon p
olic
y.
(T3.
1.14
.A); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e pre
par
atio
n
and s
ubm
issi
on o
f
ann
ual
rep
ort
s.
(T3.
1.15
.A)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egula
-
tion
s.
(T4.
2.1)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
LB
P m
anag
emen
t
prog
ram
. (T
4.1.
3.A
)
«5
be a
Ö • IN
fa duct
ion
prog
ram
)
2.
Rad
on m
easu
rem
ents
not
perf
orm
ed.
(T3.
1.3.
A); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e m
easu
re-
men
ts o
f Pri
ori
ty 1
stru
cture
s.
(T3.
1.4.
A); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e m
itig
atio
n
of s
truct
ure
s.
(T3.
1.12
.A); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e po
st-
mit
igat
ion s
ampli
ng.
(T3.
1.13
.A); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e w
ritt
en r
a-
don
poli
cy.
(T3.
1.14
.A)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egula
-
tion
s.
(T4.
2.1)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
on
s.
(T4
.3.1
)(i.
e.,
be =
C fa n
ot
per
form
ed.
(T3.
1.3.
A)
3. N
o or
in
adeq
uat
e
dat
abas
e.
(T3.
1.16
.A)
<
0 H
Tox
ic S
ubst
ance
s,
LB
P
90 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
be S
C 1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e/lo
cal
reg
ula
-
tion
s.
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
nonc
ompl
ianc
e w
ith
per
mit r
equ
irem
ent;
vio
lati
on o
f p
retr
eat-
men
t st
andar
d;
un
-
per
mit
ted d
isch
arg
e;
inad
equ
ate
storm
wa-
ter
poll
uti
on p
reve
n-
tion
pla
n;
inad
equat
e
mai
nte
nan
ce)
2.
No
or n
onco
mpli
ance
wit
h e
xis
ting
stat
e/F
eder
al N
PD
ES
for
po
int
sour
ce d
is-
char
ges
. (
WA
.10.
1)
3.
Dis
char
ges
that
wou
ld c
ause
pas
s
thro
ugh o
r in
terf
er-
ence
at
the
CO
s & be c
•H
d
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(WA
.3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e se
c-
on
dar
y c
onta
inm
ent;
un
per
mit
ted d
is-
char
ge;
inad
equat
e
sto
rmw
ater
poll
uti
on
pre
ven
tion p
lan;
im-
pro
per
mai
nte
nan
ce;
inad
equ
ate
reco
rd-
kee
pin
g o
f sl
udge
re-
mov
al;
nonco
mpli
-
ance
wit
h p
erm
it
requir
emen
ts)
2.
Dis
char
ges
that
wou
ld c
ause
pas
s
thro
ugh o
r in
terf
er-
ence
at
the
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
1)
be s
d
inad
equat
e m
anag
e-
men
t)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(WA
.3.1
)
(i.e
., unper
mit
ted d
is-
char
ge;
inad
equ
ate
seco
ndar
y co
nta
in-
men
t; n
onco
mpl
ianc
e
wit
h p
erm
it r
equir
e-
men
ts;
no b
ackup
pow
er a
t W
WT
P;
un
-
cert
ifie
d oper
ators
)
2.
Dis
char
ges
that
wou
ld c
ause
pas
s
thro
ugh o
r in
terf
er-
ence
at
the
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
1)
3.
Intr
od
uct
ion o
f po
l-
luta
nts
int
o
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
2)
be c
d
1.
Lac
k of
or
no
t m
eet-
ing r
equir
emen
ts o
f
stat
e/F
eder
al N
PD
ES
for
poin
t so
urc
e di
s-
char
ges
. (W
A.1
0.1)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(WA
.3.1
)
(i.e
., unper
mit
ted d
is-
char
ge;
inad
equat
e
seco
ndar
y c
onta
in-
men
t; i
nad
equat
e re
-
cord
keep
ing;
ex-
ceed
ed e
fflu
ent
lim
itat
ions;
non
com
-
pli
ance
wit
h p
erm
it
requir
emen
ts)
3.
Intr
oduct
ion o
f po
l-
luta
nts
into
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
2)
V • 1-4 a 0 H
u CD
CO
CD
CO ca
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 91
t>
•PN
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
1)
1.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(WQ
.3.1
)
(i.e
., no
cro
ss c
onne
c-
tion c
ontr
ol
pro
gra
m;
impro
per
wel
l cl
o-
sure
; no
dis
infe
ctio
n
of r
epai
rs;
no e
mer
-
genc
y re
sponse
pro
-
gra
m;
inad
equat
e
secu
rity
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
P2
eval
uat
ion
.
(WQ
.2.1
.A)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
man
age-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion
of
pap
erw
ork
.
(WQ
.1.2
.A)
«0
be a
• PH
S3
fa
3. I
ntr
oduct
ion o
f po
l-
luta
nts
in
to
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
2)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(WQ
.3.1
)
(i.e
., no
cro
ss c
onne
c-
tio
n c
ontr
ol p
rog
ram
;
inad
equ
ate
monit
or-
ing/i
nsp
ecti
on;
no
emer
genc
y co
ntin
-
genc
y pla
n)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egula
-
tion
s.
(WQ
.2.1
)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
man
age-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion
of p
aper
work
.
(WQ
.1.2
.A)
c
Ö
fa
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(WQ
.3.1
)
(i.e
., im
pro
per
wel
l
clos
ure;
im
pro
per
sam
plin
g; n
o cr
oss
conn
ecti
on c
ontr
ol
prog
ram
; no
dis
infe
c-
tio
n o
f re
pai
rs;
non-
com
plia
nce
wit
h
per
mit
req
uir
emen
ts)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egu
la-
tion
s.
(WQ
.2.1
)
3.
Inap
pro
pri
ate
swim
-
min
g po
ol o
per
atio
ns
and m
ainte
nan
ce.
(WQ
.4.1
.A)
c
fa
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(WQ
.3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e re
-
cord
keep
ing;
no
cros
s
conn
ecti
on c
ontr
ol
pro
gra
m;
un
cert
ifie
d
oper
ators
; w
ells
nea
r
conta
min
atio
n
sour
ce;
nonc
ompl
i-
ance
wit
h p
erm
it r
e-
quir
emen
ts)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egu
la-
tions.
(WQ
.2.1
)
3.
(WQ
.4.3
.A)
• p* a 0 H
Wat
er Q
ual
ity M
gt.
92 ERDGCERLTR-01-34
O P
■a 3 o
CO 05
, CO J-
o
i be a
a
a» +J cd
er CD
CO
«4- o
c CD
E
S c o
"cd
CD O
C cd
"3 to CD
"cd Ö
_o
CD
.—I
CO CO CD
CD 4J cd 0 er CD
cd
i* 3 CO
CO CD
'•+3 s- CD
ft
'to CD S-,
Id C o
CD
cd 3 er a>
cd
< to
pi
CD to cd 3 cd
E CD
cd
cd N
'c cd to •- o
o
CD
ft crt
_3 ID to 5 u.
s o u c o
55
-o c < jd
'-£ cd a.
c O u ft Ü
V o
4J cd T—1 #C
PH 3 c
cd a
CM
o o
55
cd C CO
a
CO
Ü
O "a} "a
a CD -^> cd
CO
CO C o 4-i
s-, o o
55
5 CD >
IM o o
55 DH
CD
cd c
>—1
4J C CD
E
O
a _o *4J
i—i oi T—1 CN CO
0) P
be
S o o c o 3 i- o
'3
'ä? "a, cd
3 er CO
cd
"o 4-> a CD
E
1 C
"cd
CD u C
.2 "a
cd o
_o
C cd CD 4J on
s.
(i.e
., par
ti-
CD
cd 3 a" CD
cd
< CO
T-i
PEJ Ü
CD 4J cd 3 er CD
X) cd
CD to a C cd
E
CO
C o
*4J
ü ■^
1
c cd
E 0!
4-> cd
o
C 3
1 cd ft o c o
• pH
-0 c
«*H o
u ea
r-i
CD U
C
.2 'S.
+->
s t~ o o
55
CN
CD to cd 3 cd
E
5 CO
o fa Ü
2 '-3
E o u c o
55
CO
cd CO
regula
ti
(AE
.3.1
)
cula
tes)
- o o
55
T-i
PH
u •-. o o
55
CN
CD
to c o
O 4J c CD
E
.5" 3 er CD
T3 cd c
r—1
CO
C CD
E CD to cd
4J cd N
'2 3 to
J3 -t-> ä <»
CO
C O
1 CD to
I cd
CO * CD ^ cd N ^ p o u I-I C
cd
s c o
£ c Cd co
9 CO en
cd to
bfi .2 o f—1 e CD
4-i o CD
ft ^^ C a T3 0) cd TJ cd <
S o o C o
55
C CD 3 C ft CM'
TH* a Cd
a> +J cd
-t-> en
CO
Ö o
cd
4J
■a
er CD
X) cd c
h-t
cd 4-1 C CD
E
o c
_o *3
r-i r-i
tfn CO CD
P, S-
to Ö o
3 o co CD
0 CD to
s
<
"a
3
"3 ft
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 93
©
E Ö
-3 S3
oi
Ü
03 bo Ö
-3 Ö
o
1.
Inad
equ
ate
stora
ge
at
90-d
ay a
reas
(M
ulti
-
ple)
2.
Inad
equat
e or
lac
k o
f
char
acte
riza
tion o
f
was
tes.
(HW
.10.
1)
05
S3 T3
S3
fa perw
ork.
(CR
.1.2
.A)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h F
eder
al s
afet
y
requir
emen
ts n
ot
in
chec
klis
t.
(HM
.2.1
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
haz
ard c
omm
unic
a-
tion
pro
gra
m.
(HM
.10.
1)
3.
Impro
per
sto
rage
of
com
pres
sed
gas
cyli
nder
s.
(HM
.45.
1)
1.
Inad
equ
ate
stora
ge
at 9
0-da
y ar
eas
(Mul
tipl
e)
2.
Inad
equ
ate
or l
ack
of c
har
acte
riza
tion
of w
aste
s.
GO
S3 -0
S3
fa
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
Fed
eral
req
uir
emen
ts
no
t in
che
ckli
st.
(HM
.2.1
)
4.
Fai
lure
to
imple
men
t
a h
azar
do
us
mat
eria
ls
man
agem
ent
pro
gra
m.
(HM
.1.5
.A)
2.
Tra
inin
g r
egar
din
g
haz
ardous
chem
ical
use
in l
abora
tori
es.
(HM
.15.
2)
2.
Impro
per
sto
rage
of
com
pre
ssed
gas
cyl
in-
der
s.
(HM
.45.
1)
1.
Inad
equ
ate
or l
ack
of
char
acte
riza
tio
n o
f
was
tes.
(HW
.10.
1)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
Fed
eral
req
uir
emen
ts
no
t in
che
ckli
st.
a 0 H
Haz
ardous
Mat
eria
ls
Mgt
.
Haz
ardous
Was
te
Mgt
.
94 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
T3 01
o o
HI ~o
<V 4> o X CD
3 < 01
1 c
01 r-
r 0) c
"o r
4)
o I-, ft <
o 0) -a
SB c
CO
i-i
cd 03
3 cr
01
03
o to
s 3 C ft
to
T3
03
3 rr
c 'a
o 1—1
r-i
tec E 3 6
I—1 o fc "-»"
o>
03
<*- o
u.
c < 0>
-c C3
'■3
01 T3 03
a. E
CM
o • FH o
3
co
lO V- P-, S Pi- lz; t—t
tl be a; rr^ c <U 3 o r—i
-t-> 3 'o ft
o
o 03
l-J
I* O
O
'£ 'is u
S u pi o
o 2
5 to 3 o u
01 be c 03
T3
Ö 00
pi
<f
o o 2
o 01 to
'3 c
a) u 3
-3 01 o
CO T-i t>j CO 2 r-i
os Ö o
in i 01 c o 0)
-t-> 01 ,3
tec £ 3
X a> 03
|
C • f-i o ft
XS CO
_c u o
OH"
0)
03
£7
<
03
3 a- 01
XI 03 O
5 ft n
< CO
03 3 cr 01
xs 03
tr. o
3 01
ai to
'o 3
o rH o T3
0) XI 0> a>
o
03
CO
r-i PS 2
C
o o
tx c
'3 •—
0)
E o> •—
.o
Pi
c
o o 2
£ to CO 01 to to 03
o
til
-< CO r-i CO 2 i—i
XJ 1 a>
01 0) 1 m ^—V 4)
CO 3 _o +3 03
3
13 0) a> u X 0)
be CO
Ö CO
6
03 N
'S 03
E?
U o
01 ft 03
3 a*
-3 03
C
< CO
rH
pi
01
03 3 cr
to aj u
3 o to
C 03
c
be 03
3 03
E
03 N
'S 03 bo
o
tec a v-v
£ 3
-M
'o ft
03
O
X3 < o g T3
03
01 Pi
0)
E < 01
01
o T3
V ft ^ o3 <; ft ■
O rH
3 rH
.2 O d
•PH
fa
u o 03
CO
ID t>
3 cr o>
XS 03 c
1—1
03
Ö
e
ft tr-, O
3 _o '■+J
co 1—i
5
1« o
o 03
OH
cd r?
3
O
O
03 s-, 3
+J 03
2
Ol be 03
C 03
s
in r-i pi 2
3 cr 01
xs 03
C
c 03
+->
3 0)
E <f,
CO r-i <N' CO r-i r?
03
to a 0) o 0)
E 01 3 o 1 c to
• M o o <1 to
0 H
to o>
'äs In
03
■—
'> c
Cd s- <u
O
PH
to 01 3 to to
> C
W s_ 01
X, -4-1
o
01 to
'o 2
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 95
o
i d
C
<
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
pro
cure
men
t of
recy
-
cle
conte
nt
mat
eria
ls
(04
.6.1
)
1. I
nad
equat
e co
mm
uni-
cati
on (
Mul
tipl
e)
1.
Inad
equat
e pes
tici
des
sto
rag
e or
mix
ing a
r-
eas
(Mul
tipl
e)
0)
be d
♦ PH
S3
(02.
1.5.
A)
2. N
o or
in
adeq
uat
e
nois
e co
mpla
int
proc
edur
e.
(02.
1.10
.A)
1 1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
pro
gra
m t
o im
ple-
men
t th
e P
2 p
lan
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
pro
cure
men
t of
re-
cycl
e co
nte
nt
mat
e-
rial
s (0
4.6
.1)
1. I
nad
equ
ate
com
-
mu
nic
atio
n (
Mul
ti-
ple)
1.
In
adeq
uat
e pe
sti-
cide
s st
ora
ge
or
mix
ing
area
s (M
ul-
CO
s a TWO S3
•0 d
1.
Lac
k of
imple
men
ta-
tio
n o
f P2
reco
mm
en-
dat
ions.
(04.1
.9.A
)
2.
Pro
cure
d p
roduct
s not
mad
e fr
om r
eco
ver
ed
soli
d w
aste
.
(04.
1.11
.A)
1. I
nad
equat
e tr
ainin
g
for
env
iro
nm
enta
l
per
sonnel
. (0
5.7
.l.A
)
1.
Inad
equat
e m
anag
e-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tio
n o
f pap
erw
ork
.
Topic
Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
IRP
oq •OH
en CD 3 en en
> c
SH
CD
O Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
Pro
gra
m M
gt. ti s
en CD
"o '-C en CD
96 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
O O
too a
a
c 4) 'y w 3 4-3 »3
3 u d a*
F. •r 9)
T3 c -tJ
d CO s a
c E a. ^H
o o 3 c
o CN
o C3 'a.
d
-2 6 OH
0) be o a> d S-,
o co n T3
+J en d 01 0) -*-> HI d
a CD
co 3 d cr 01
is Tf T) d ■rt
C u O
05 05
bO S3
• PH '
S3 a;
"a
d 3 a*
d C
c 0)
E s '3
-4-J d E a 3 C
T—1
Ö CN
Ö s d UH
o -a:
o 01 ^-^ o u r/i o T1
d Q. C d H-l co d U
be «41 O 01
CO I.
O co C T3
-*-» u to
-u d
m a) d s-
d a O)
cn 3 d o" ■s
T) TJ d C
■u c 'S
h-H CO
GO 05
to a
a
o H
CN
0) _> '35 C o>
01
p< s o u o
<
5J
PH
o d t.
+J
3 o u 0)
T3
fc Ö £
d
3 d
01
o>
01 In -u o c
< T-i
PH
T3 o> > O
a.
c o> 6 0) ho d C d
to D
PH
•>#
cu 01
E +j o c o
T3
C 3 O 12 3 a* 0) IH
3 o
-a c d
in ~ .K
— .5 PH a> « HH
3 3 o CO u Ol OH
d Ü
t 01 o
3 01
CO 01
-a
0) PH
d s-
_o 'E
01
01 T3 s- O
co u V 3 W
Tf
PH
d 3 a* o>
T3 d 3
o d
c d Ü 01
S r o 0) PH
3 d CO d E ^-, C*H
O 3 n, >i o 3
3 o a CN o
5. to
d 01 O
PH o d
PH
ft
o PH
01 •4J CO d
3 "o CO
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 97
©
E ÖD C
• PM
S3
fa clab
les(
SO
.lO
.l)
1. I
nad
equ
ate
of la
ck o
f
seco
nd
ary c
onta
in-
men
t fo
r bulk
sto
rag
e
tanks.
(ST
.5.1
)
25 < 25
0)
tec Ö
• IN
= • PH
fa
© i—i
d CO
CO 0)
1
1. In
adeq
uat
e of
lack
of
seco
ndar
y co
nta
in-
men
t fo
r b
ulk
sto
r-
age
tan
ks.
(ST
.5.1
)
< 25 1.
N
o or
inad
equat
e
Inst
alla
tion
Asb
es-
tos
Man
agem
ent
CO
ten Ö •rt
T3 C
fa recy
clin
g pro
gra
ms
and p
roce
dure
s.
(S0
.25
.2.A
)
1.
Inad
equat
e st
ora
ge
of
con
tam
inat
ed r
eus-
able
sh
arp
s.
(SO
.110
.1)
1. N
onco
mpl
ianc
e w
ith
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(SO
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
impro
per
dis
posa
l of
infe
ctio
us
was
te)
1. In
adeq
uat
e of
lack
of
seco
ndar
y c
on
tain
men
t
for
bu
lk s
tora
ge
tan
ks.
(ST
.5.1
)
< 25 1.
N
o or
inc
ompl
ete
as-
bes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
A)
Topic
ti
Ö CO H
CD be cfl ■~ o
CO Tox
ic S
ub
stan
ces,
PC
Bs
Tox
ic S
ub
stan
ces,
Asb
esto
s
98 ERDC/CERL TR-01-34
o
E a
• IN
S3
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
noti
-
fica
tion
of h
ou
sing
occu
pant
s of
po
ten
tial
LB
P h
azar
ds.
(T
4.10
.1)
1.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(WA
.3.1
)
(i.e
., u
np
erm
itte
d d
is-
char
ge;
WW
TP i
nop-
erat
ion
al)
05
S3 TS d
< T—i
CN
c es
CÜ < z 1.
N
o or
inad
equat
e
noti
fica
tion
of h
ous-
ing
occu
pant
s of
po-
ten
tial
LB
P h
azar
ds.
(T4.
10.1
)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
an
d l
ocal
regula
tions.
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
un-
per
mit
ted d
is-
char
ge;
WW
TP i
n-
op
erat
ion
al)
CO
be S3
• IN
S3 • IN
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
Inst
alla
tion
Asb
esto
s
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n.
(T2.
1.4.
A)
< z
< Z 1.
N
onco
mpli
ance
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal r
egu-
lati
ons.
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
unper
mit
ted d
is-
char
ge;
WW
TP
inoper
atio
nal
)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
NP
DE
S r
epo
rtin
g r
e-
quir
emen
ts.
(WA
.10.
2)
3.
Fai
lure
to
surv
ey
ü a 0 H
Tox
ic S
ub
stan
ces,
Rad
on
Tox
ic S
ub
stan
ces,
LB
P
u 0)
-4-> es
CÜ
w cs
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 99
o
i d
fa
1.
In
adeq
uat
e m
on
ito
r-
ing/s
ampli
ng
(M
ulti
-
ple)
0)
two a
Ö fa
1.
In
adeq
uat
e m
oni-
tori
ng/s
ampli
ng
(Mul
tipl
e)
be d
d fa st
orm
wat
er d
is-
char
ge.
(WA
.10.
4)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
ons.
(WQ
.3.1
)
(i.e
., u
np
erm
itte
d d
is-
char
ge;
inad
equ
ate
monit
ori
ng/i
nsp
ec-
tion
)
2.
Inad
equat
e m
anag
e-
men
t an
d o
rgan
iza-
tion o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(WQ
.1.2
.A)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
mai
nte
nan
ce o
f
swim
min
g p
ools a
nd
swim
min
g a
reas
.
(WQ
.4.3
.A)
o H
13
It 0)
100 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix G: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1991-1998 by Topic for the Army Reserve
Topic Finding
Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations.
(AE.2.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate emissions inventory. (AE.1.3.R)
Class 3
Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties sur-
vey/National Register (CR.5.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate consultation with the SHPO
(CR.5.3) Class 1
3. No or inadequate regulation of the excavation of
archeological sites (CR.15.1) Class 1
Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate MSDSs (HM.1.2) HS
2. No or inadequate coordination with the fire de-
partment (HM.1.3.R) HS
3. Containers of hazardous materials are not correctly
labeled, tagged or marked (HM.1.3)HS
Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. No or inadequate inventory of hazardous waste
(HW.1.4.R) «ass 3
2. Inappropriately operating as a CESQG (HW. 15.1)
Class 1
3. No CESQG training records are maintained
(HW. 15.3) Class 1
Natural Resources Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate survey of endangered and
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 101
Topic Finding
threatened species (NR.20.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate ground maintenance (NR. 10.l.R) Class 3
3. Lack of or inadequate INRMP (NR. 1.3.R) Class 1
Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. No or inadequate integration of NEPA into plan-
ning (01.5.2.R) Class 1
2. No or inadequate maintenance of NEPA regulations
(Ol.l.l.R) Class 3
3. No or inadequate management and organization of
paper work (01.1.2.R) Class 3
Other Env. Issues: Noise 1. No or inadequate ICUZ study (02.1.3.R) Class 3
2. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure
(O2.1.10.R) Class 3
Other Env. Issues: IRP 1. No or inadequate screening for past use of hazard-
ous substances (03.1.3.R) Class 3
2. No or inadequate removal site evaluation (03.1.2)
Class 1
Other Env. Issues: P2 1. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous
substances (04.10.l.R) Class 3
2. No or inadequate Hazardous Waste Minimization
Program (O4.10.2.R); Inadequate written pollution
prevention plan (04.1.4.R) Class 3
Other Env Issues: Program Mgt. 1. No or incomplete file of environmental regulations
(05.1.1.R) Class 3
2. Inadequate training for environmental personnel
(05.7.1.R) Class 3
3. No or inadequate rapport between the Environ-
mental Officer and the support MACOM environ-
mental office (05.8.1.R) Class 3
Pesticides Mgt. 1. No or inadequate review of pesticide contracts
(PM.1.7.R) Class 3
102 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Topic Finding
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(PM.3.1) (i.e., improper storage; inadequate record-
keeping) Class 1
3. Non-DOD pesticide applicators are not certified
(PM.5.1) Class 1
POL Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate spill containment and
cleanup materials (PO.20.1) Class 1
2. No copy of SPCC (PO.5.1) Class 1
3. No or inadequate SPCC training (PO.5.7) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Nonparticipation in state/local recycling programs
(S0.25.1.R) Class 3
2. Installation personnel not periodically informed
about materials prohibited from disposal
(SO.10.3.R) Class 3
3. Inadequate markings on food waste containers
(SO.10.4.R) Class 3
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Inadequate closure of USTs (ST.95.3) Class 1
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(ST.3.1) (i.e., inadequate UST closure documenta-
tion; inadequate training; inadequate secondary
containment; inadequate monitoring/inspection;
unregistered storage tanks) Class 1
3. Substandard USTs not upgraded, closed, or re-
moved (ST.25.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No ML markings on PCB equipment (Tl.10.2)
Class 1
2. No inspections for >500 ppm PCB transformers
(Tl.20.7) Class 1
3. No or inadequate PCB inventory (Tl.10.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or incomplete asbestos survey (T2.1.3.R) Class 3
2. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Manage-
ment Plan (T2.1.4.R) Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 103
Topic Finding
3. No or inadequate protective equipment for asbestos
personnel (T2.1.7.R) Class 3
Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Radon measurements not performed (T3.1.3.R)
Class 3
2. No or inadequate measurements of Priority 1 struc-
tures (T3.1.4.R) Class 3
3. No or inadequate long-term measurement of Prior-
ity 2 and 3 structures (T3.1.6.R) Class 3
Toxic Substances, LBP 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(T4.3.1) (i.e., paint chips) Class 1
Wastewater Mgt. 1. No or inadequate surveillance of stormwater dis-
charge (WA.10.4) Class 1
2. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW
(WA.25.2) Class 1
3. Discharges that would cause pass through or inter-
ference at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1
Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations
(WQ.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted discharge; inadequate
secondary containment; inadequate maintenance;
inadequate implementation of stormwater pollution
prevention plan; no grease traps; noncompliance
with permit requirements) Class 1
2. No or inadequate monitoring for lead and copper
(WQ.50.6) Class 1
3. Inappropriate use of pipe, solder, or flux that con-
tains lead (WQ.25.1) Class 1
104 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
ü
.2 n (5 a)
8 S .2 8
"£ 5> 111 1- c >
— LL (/) ^ Ö) (I) C >
13 0) C (0
X
C a> Q. Q. <
00
be a
-a a
t* .«
bo a
C
CO .A
be
be a
a
.os
be a •»*
-o a
o
o ej c o Z
73 c 3
cu
fa < to C o
3 tx
CD
CD -a
CU a c 3
.-• o
c T, t£ i") 3 0) "Z >—- CU 3 CJ CD 3 ^ Tr, *-* CO CT CU
a> <D a. ,3 S-, c ,_ "3 ifc^
T-, o U. O 3 3 o O
o -fcj
>->
en
£ o CJ 3 O
25
o '■ZJ 3
ho «3 •-
0)
'53 he fa
<
C
O o
25
be _c 'a. cu cu
bx
TJ 3 3
CO
3 3 cr cu
-3 3
pB
U o o
25
3 CU >
co 3
_o 'co 03
E 0)
«2 "3
3 = ■-
Pi
fa
o a x 0)
■3 3 4)
fa
O CO
a> a
:= 05
o CJ 3 o
25
3 cj
_o
•3 3
fa <
U3
C o
.-3 M
-3 cu
cu a c 3
r3 <D > o 3
in CU O ■-
3 O tn
bo C
'-£ en cu
-t->
to 3 O
'in CO
s cu
CU I ^
"ft E o o
_S
t* o o
25
c cu >
en C o
00 T—i
o cj 3 o
25
3 S- a>
cu fa
cu X. -t-> o
r3
CO 3 o
bb fa cu <
o o
25
cu t 3 3 CT
< -3 r-l
Iß 0)
3 o o !- a ü fa O
o a cu
Ö 3 3 o SH o
-*J c cu rrl 3 3 r3
CU -a
CU
E 3 3 .o
3 3 cr cu
3
u o
o 25
3 cu >
to C o
«
fa
o
^2 ,
Si — CM
fa <
cu CJ 3 3 Ü
•£ cu ^- "5 E o CJ 3 o
25
cu fa
s_ cu
X.
en 3 o
o CJ
3 o
25
en C
_o
'en CO
fa
3 IM CU
-3 a>
fa i. cu
H3
CO
C o
5 cu
3 3 o- CU
-3 3
_C
I- O o
25
3 cu >
^3
CO
C o
'55 en
,-^ cu 0J
o
cu 'S, E o o
_B
Si o o
25
o s- a U fa Ü
Si cu t 3 3 CT
■e o a CU u +J 3 cu E CU Si 3 CJ
0J
uo oo
ft 3 s
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 105
CO 05
c
• p*
fa chlo
roet
hyle
ne d
ry
clea
nin
g f
acil
itie
s
(AE
.75.
8);
No
cert
i-
fica
tion
for
ref
rig-
eran
t re
cove
ry
equip
men
t us
ed f
or
MV
AC
s (A
E.9
0.6)
1.
Inad
equat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and o
r-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa
-
per
wo
rk (
CR
.1.2
.R)
2.
Eff
ects
of under
tak-
ing o
n h
isto
ric
pro
per
ties
/ N
atio
nal
Reg
iste
r no
t ta
ken
into
acc
ount
(CR
.5.2
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
man
agem
ent
of a
r-
chae
olog
ical r
e-
sour
ces
(CR
.15.
2)
be d
• PH
a fa
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and
loc
al
reg
ula
tio
ns
(CR
.3.1
)
(i.e
., no
cu
ltu
ral
re-
sour
ces
stu
dy
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICR
MP (
CR
.5.1
.R)
3.
Inap
pro
pri
ate
man
-
agem
ent
of h
isto
ric
pro
per
ties
aff
ecte
d
by u
nder
takin
gs
(CR
.5.3
)
be &
S3
fa freo
n re
cove
ry.
(AE
.90.
1):
No
or i
n-
adeq
uat
e do
cum
en-
tati
on o
f se
rvic
ing
and a
mounts
of r
e-
frig
eran
t ad
ded
to
appli
ance
s.
(AE
.95.
2)
1. N
o or
inad
equat
e
his
tori
c pro
per
ties
surv
ey/N
atio
nal
Reg
iste
r.
(CR
.5.1
)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
regula
tion o
f the
ex-
cav
atio
n o
f ar
cheo
-
logi
cal
site
s.
(CR
.15.
1)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICR
MP
. (C
R.5
.1.R
);
Inap
pro
pri
ate
man
-
agem
ent
of h
isto
ric
pro
per
ties
aff
ecte
d
by u
nder
takin
gs.
(CR
.5.3
)
«5
be ti
C • PH
fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
his
tori
c pro
per
ties
surv
ey/N
atio
nal
Reg
iste
r.
(CR
.5.1
)
2.
Inap
pro
pri
ate
man
-
agem
ent
of h
isto
ric
pro
per
ties
aff
ecte
d
by u
nder
takin
gs.
(CR
.5.3
)
be
• pH
fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
his
tori
c p
rop
erti
es
surv
ey/N
atio
nal
Reg
iste
r.
(CR
.5.1
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
man
agem
ent
of a
r-
chae
olog
ical
re-
sour
ces.
(CR
.15.
2)
3.
Eff
ects
of u
nder
tak-
ing o
n his
tori
c
pro
per
ties
/Nat
ional
Reg
iste
r not
taken
into
acc
ount
.
(CR
.5.2
); S
HP
O n
ot
consu
lted
duri
ng
cult
ura
l re
sourc
es
Ü
0 H
Cu
ltu
ral
Res
ourc
es
Mgt
.
ERDCCERLTR-01-34
GO 05
£ be a
-8 a fa
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h oth
er F
eder
al
regula
tions
rega
rd-
ing
haz
ardous
ma-
teri
als
(HM
.2.1
)
2.
Inad
equat
e tr
ainin
g
for
haz
ardous
ma-
teri
als
pers
onne
l
(HM
.10.
2)
2.
Im
pro
per
sto
rage
of
com
pres
sed
gas
cyli
nder
s (H
M.4
5.1)
£ bfl
T3 C
• |H
1.
Lac
k of
or
inad
e-
quat
e M
SD
Ss
(HM
.1.2
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
wri
tten
haz
ardous
com
munic
atio
n
pro
gra
m (
HM
.10.
1)
3.
Inad
equat
e fl
am-
mab
le/c
om
bu
stib
le
stora
ge
room
s in
-
side
of b
uil
din
gs
(HM
.35.
6)
£ bo
a • FH
fa
1.
Lac
k of
or
inad
e-
quat
e M
SD
Ss.
(HM
.1.2
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
coor
dina
tion
wit
h
the
fire
dep
artm
ent.
(HM
.1.3
.R)
3.
Conta
iner
s of
haz
-
ardous
mat
eria
ls
are
not
corr
ectl
y la
-
bele
d, t
agged
or
mar
ked
. (H
M.1
.3)
£ be a
a fa
1.
Lac
k of
or
inad
e-
qu
ate
MS
DS
s
(HM
.1.2
)
2.
Conta
iner
s of
haz
-
ardous
mat
eria
ls
are
not
corr
ectl
y la
-
bele
d, t
agged
or
mar
ked
. (H
M.1
.3);
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
coor
dina
tion
wit
h
the
fire
dep
artm
ent.
(HM
.1.3
.R); I
nad
e-
qu
ate
house
kee
pin
g
in h
azar
dous
mat
e-
rial
s st
ora
ge
area
s;
(HM
.1.4
); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e w
ritt
en
haz
ardous
com
mu-
nic
atio
n p
rogr
am.
(HM
.10.
1);
Inad
e-
qu
ate
trai
nin
g f
or
haz
ardous
mat
eri-
als
per
son
nel
.
£ bfi
-0 c • FH
fa
co
« O
bo Ö
"S Ö
'S.
1.
Lac
k of
or
inad
e-
quat
e M
SD
Ss.
(HM
.1.2
)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
reg
ula
tio
ns.
(HM
.2.1
)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
coord
inat
ion w
ith
the
fire
dep
artm
ent.
(HM
.1.3
.R)
o H
Haz
ard
ou
s
Mat
eria
ls M
gt.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 107
CO
c • IN
= • IN
fa
1.
Inad
equ
ate
or l
ack
of c
har
acte
riza
tio
n
of w
aste
s (H
W. 1
0.1)
2.
90 d
ay l
imit e
x-
ceed
ed o
n st
ora
ge
of
haz
was
te
(HW
.55.
1)
3.
Inad
equat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and
S
• IN
fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
inven
tory
of h
az-
ardous
was
te
(HW
.1.4
.R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
wri
tten
haz
ardous
was
te m
anag
emen
t
pla
n(H
W.1
.3.R
)
3.
Inad
equat
e m
an-
CO
bo a
c • IH
fa 1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
inven
tory
of h
az-
ardous
was
te.
(HW
.1.4
.R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
trai
nin
g r
ecor
ds.
(HW
.15.
3)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
wri
tten
haz
ardous
TWO d
*»N
•0 a fa (H
M.1
0.2)
; N
o or
inad
equ
ate
mat
eri-
als
for
spil
l cl
eanu
p.
(HM
.20.
1);
Inad
e-
quat
e fl
amm
able
/
com
bust
ible
sto
rage
cabin
ets.
(HM
.35.
5);
Inad
e-
quat
e fi
re p
rote
c-
tion f
or f
lam
mab
le/
com
bust
ible
sto
rag
e
area
s.
(HM
.35.
9);
Impro
per
sto
rage
of
com
pres
sed
gas
cyl
-
inder
s.
(HM
.45.
1)
1. N
o or
in
adeq
uat
e
inven
tory
of h
az-
ardous
was
te.
(HW
.1.4
.R); N
o or
inad
equ
ate
seco
n-
dar
y c
onta
inm
ent
in
haz
ard
ou
s w
aste
stora
ge
area
s.
(HW
.10.2
);In
ap-
W)
a fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
wri
tten
haz
ard
ou
s
was
te m
anag
emen
t
pla
n.
(HW
.1.3
.R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
inven
tory
of h
az-
ardous
was
te.
(HW
.1.4
.R)
3.
Inad
equ
ate
trai
nin
g
• pH
0 H
Haz
ardous
Was
te M
gt.
108 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO .05
be G
• PH
a fa
05
Ml Ö
•pH
-0 Ö
•M fa
a .2 ^
CO N
'S bo
o
■~-
a. CO a
o o z
c a;
ca 3 a"
ca C
a) ca
ca
CO 3 o — ca N ca
c o Z
CU CO
ca c ca
3
a> be a;
be .£ >,
u C ca
£ s *
— CD
<- -£„•-— CD
o fa
E. 4J
cu
en C o
o -a
o Z ~ S — -=" £
5 a. ca
3 PC
c
ca 3 a" o
ca c
CD
ca c
o o Z "be
3 o
-a
ca
be c '£ '3
o o z
o «2
DC
c '5
ca 3 cr cu
T3 ca c
— ^ = be 3 ca
• 3 a* ? w .3
V o cu I*
o en 3 o V s N ca
JS
o
C ca
+J .«
ca a o c o
o z
I» I«
bo c 3 3
1 •£ c3
c -u a) CO
S N
cu c ho ca ca to
■-. o
u CD P.
CN
ca
£.3 fa £
CO
lO I—I
-a cu C
50 .05
be a
a • PH
fa
s ..
S °* 0) CO bo _j ca *; c £ ca 2
CN cu to -U 1—1 ca KJ
3- ^ CU MH
ca 3
3 o ca o ft Z
bo 3
ca
«5 .05
be a
a
.05
be Ö
•i-<
ä • 1H fa
o
ca d a>
a. c? ca C o 00
>-, fa (!) o i—i
ca IT5 r en i-l
P. o ca £
.3 SH
o bo 3
"S "8 IH
a> 3 Ö o co s-, <u ^ P< <M
& Ü
CD 3 3 o co u cu p.
fa Q CO EH
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 109
«4H i-
00
be c
c fa
-£ c 3 s -s s 2 « 3 CO 3 u cd 3 cd
* 1 ^ co u .3 3 u O O cd ft
r—1
co t>
s B — 13 -U CD fi 13
O a; ft ü
CD -*-} cd 3 cr CO
-a a c SH
o o
55
r-1
CS CO
r-i
cs
PH
CS
1—1
G CO
e CO to cc c cd
£ CO
-G
o G o
'-Ö CO > SH CD CD
G O o
13 G cd
CD CO u 3 o CD CO
Si 3 ca a
o SH
-H3
C o u
Q O O
EH
CD
C 3
13 CD
u cd
+-> c o u CD
a
3 cd
CS 00 r-i
CS 55
o
o c CO
cd CD CD O
3 o CD CO
>> % cd 3 er CD
cd a CO s- cd
3 a. a 3 CO
O +J
X) CD bo cd C cd S
CD
E >> 3
£ CD
-4J
ft o CO
"3 0)
-S
c o
'to
o
C cd
X. r- CO
T3 G cd to c
+3 CD
«2 CO CD o S-
3 O CO CO SH
to
co 3 3 cd CO - -a
CD i—i CD CD
3 '>, _CD CD
ft 3 '+3 cd
^ •§ £ 5
>-. 'C 9- to §
CD °
fi ?. Id «
"Sb r-i ° (S
•2 g HO 6
CD ri CO
C '3 S CO
-tJ CS
3 a1
CO
SH >. Tl CD
05
bxi S
T3
a>
"ft s o u a u
1
CO u
"3 SH
3 -t-> Cd
C «4H o
s
o '-Ö cd
"3 CO SH
CD CO
SH
o o
55
r-i r-i
CD
C 3 o SH
be <H o CO
Ü
o
r-i Ö r-l
CO > SH
3 CD
CO
cd 3 er CO
c cd
T3 CO SH
CO bo S cd
Td
'u CO ft CO
13 CD
G CD
-t-J cd
rH
Ö CM
Ö
fa
o o
55
SH
3 o CD
CS 55
CS
.0 C cS C
CS 5 13 cd a
i-i CO
«4-1
o
CD SH CS
55
r-i
«0 u C Cd
13 s- CO
XS CO
fa
CO +-> c3 3
CD
SH O CO u z—V
c CO
s CO bo cd fi cd S c
I SH CD ft
4-3 o ö
c CO -(-> CO
'co
1
o u ä SH
<D 13 O
£
fi
T3 fi
co'
bo C
Ö
ft s o u Ö o
SH
CO
o
s
CO
1, rH
CM
13 ca a SH O
a cd
CO
'3
CD
C 3 o
(S r-i Ö
CS
CO
a o
cd SH CD
C o o
■a CO
B ■~
«2
cd C
_o '+3 cd >
_ft 'u C •c ft CD
CS t> Ö r-l
CS
fa 55 £ S 6 55 S SH
bo hJ ft O ^ CD
CO
CD
3 g r-i CN CM
«5 CD
Cd
CT CO
1
G a xt G
1
Cd CO u
■s CD CO
be 13 Cd
.G
SH
CO
«+H •n 'u ^^ o
5?
G cd
CO ft co
i—i
Ö CM
S3 o o
55 £ CO xs
CO CS fa 3
CD CO bo
G CO
r5
r-i
CO
as 3 cr CO
i
Ö a XS G
i
CS 0 SH
CO CO
■ CO
T3 cd Ö
OH*
CD
cd 3 er CD
«H o CO o
CS r-i ö
be XS cd G
•pH
CO
O
XI Ö cd
'u CO ft CD Ö
SH
O
CH
CS 55
CS co
13 cd a
SH
cd Ö CO
co 13
'd SH ei? Tl CN CO rH I* Ö '3 a
C rH
a o o
55 £ CO 13
CO p3 u cd CS o 3 CS
fa 3 CO
CO bo
Ö CO N»'
cd 3 er £ 55 fe 55
r-i CM' CN
ü CD
o, ,_ CO
0 cd SH
H 3 CS
55
3 o CD CO
03 ft S
110 ERDGCERLTR-01-34
CO
be c
-3 a
• PH
fa erat
ive
agre
emen
ts
do n
ot
stat
e th
at
the
DO
D w
ill
carr
y
out
its
obli
gati
ons
under
the
agre
e-
men
t to
the
exte
nt
that
fu
nd
ing i
s
avai
lab
le
(NR
.1.1
2.R
);N
oor
inad
equat
e tr
ain
ing
of la
w e
nfor
cem
ent
per
sonnel
(NR
.4.3
.R); N
o or
inad
equat
e E
ndan
-
gere
d S
peci
es M
an-
agem
ent
Pla
n
(NR
.20.
2.R
)
1.
In
adeq
uat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and
or-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa
-
perw
ork
(01.
1.2.
R)
TSC ti
ti • pH
fa
1.
E
nvir
onm
enta
l re
-
view
not
in
teg
rate
d
con
curr
entl
y w
ith
oth
er p
lannin
g a
nd
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g a
c-
tio
ns
(01.5
.2.R
)
be ti
• IN
ti fa
1.
Envir
onm
enta
l re
-
view
not
inte
gra
ted
into
pla
nnin
g a
nd
deci
sion
mak
ing.
(01
.5.2
. R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
copi
es o
f re
gula
-
ti -a ti
fa rs 55
be ti
ti • p*
fa
1.
NE
PA
no
t in
te-
gra
ted i
nto
pla
n-
ning
. (0
1.5
.1)
2.
En
vir
on
men
tal
re-
view
no
t in
tegra
ted
into
pla
nnin
g a
nd
dec
isio
n-m
akin
g.
Ü ft o
Oth
er E
nvi-
ronm
enta
l
Issu
es:
NE
PA
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 111
CXI
us S3
a
1.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
ICU
Z s
tud
y
(02.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
nois
e co
mp
lain
t
pro
cedure
(O2.
1.10
.R)
3.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
copi
es o
f en
viro
n-
tu d
(3
1.
No
or i
nco
mp
lete
ICU
Z s
tudy
(02
.1.3
.R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
nois
e co
mpla
int
pro
ced
ure
(02.1
.10.R
)
«0
be ö
C • iM
tion
s.
(Ol.
l.l.
R);
Inad
equ
ate
man
-
agem
ent
and o
r-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa
-
perw
ork.
(01
.1.2
.R);
NE
PA
imple
men
tati
on a
c-
tiv
itie
s no
t ex
e-
cute
d.
(01.
1.3.
R);
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
reg
ula
tio
ns.
(01.
2.1)
; E
A n
ot
prod
uced
wh
en r
e-
quir
ed.
(01.5
.2)
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
ICU
Z s
tudy
.
(02.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
nois
e co
mpla
int
proc
edur
e.
(O2.
1.10
.R)
3.
Inad
equat
e as
sess
-
men
t of
hel
ico
pte
r
»ft
be c
• 1-H
d •pH
1. N
onco
mpl
ianc
e w
ith
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
ula
tio
ns.
(02.3
.1)
(i.e
., no
ICU
Z s
tate
men
t)
bJD a
•i-i
(01.5
.2.R
)
3.
Cat
egori
cal
excl
u-
sion
s.
(01
.5.3
.R)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
ICU
Z s
tudy.
(02.1
.3.R
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
nois
e co
mp
lain
t
pro
cedure
.
(O2.
1.10
.R)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
asse
ssm
ent
of th
e
Ö
0 H
Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
Noi
se
112 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO
be c
Ö
fa men
tal
nois
e re
gu-
lati
on
s (0
2.1.
1.R
);
Inad
equat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and o
r-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa
-
perw
ork
(02.
1.2.
R);
No
atte
mpt
to
min
imiz
e en
viro
n-
men
tal
nois
e
(02.1
.7.R
);N
oor
inco
mpl
ete
oper
a-
tion
al d
ata
on n
oi.s
e
prod
ucin
g ac
tivit
ies
(02.
1.9.
R)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
IRP M
anag
emen
t
Pla
n a
nd a
n IR
P
Gui
danc
e an
d P
ro-
cedu
re M
anual
(03.
1.6.
R)
2.
Inad
equat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and o
r-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa
-
perw
ork
(03.
1.2.
R)
g a
• PH
-a e
fa
1.
Wh
en t
her
e is a
haz
ardous
sub-
stan
ce c
onta
min
ant
site
, w
hich
mig
ht
requir
e C
ER
CL
A
resp
onse
act
ion
s, a
rem
ov
al s
ite
eval
u-
atio
n i
s re
qu
ired
to
be d
one. (
03.1
.2)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
«0 S
bfi c • PH
a fa no
ise.
No
or i
nad
e-
quat
e o
per
atio
nal
dat
a m
ainta
ined
.
(02.
1.6.
R);
(02.
1.9.
R);
Non
-
com
plia
nce
wit
h
stat
e an
d l
ocal
regula
tions.
(02.3
.1)
(i.e
., in
ade-
quat
e IC
UZ s
tate
-
men
t)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
scre
enin
g f
or p
ast
use
of h
azar
do
us
subst
ance
s
(03.
1.3.
R)
2.
Inad
equat
e re
mo
val
site
eval
uat
ion.
(03.1
.2)
bo a
a fa
<:
if
be
a • PH
fa effe
ct o
f no
ise.
(02
.1.5
.R)
1. N
o or
inad
equat
e
scre
enin
g f
or p
ast
use
of h
azar
do
us
sub
stan
ces.
(03.1
.3.R
)
Ü
0 H
Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
IRP
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 113
CO
a • 1-4
Ö •rN
fa
1.
Inad
equat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and o
r-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa
-
per
work
(04
.1.2
.R);
No
or i
nad
equat
e
wri
tten
pol
luti
on
pla
n(0
4.1
.4.R
)
1.
No
or i
ncom
-
ple
te f
ile
of e
nvi-
a
Ö fa sc
reen
ing f
or p
ast
use
of haz
ardous
subst
ance
s
(03.
1.3.
R);
(03
.1.5
.R)
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
wri
tten
poll
uti
on
pla
n (
04
.1.4
.R)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
regula
tions
(04.3
.1)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e
mai
nte
nan
ce;
in-
adeq
uat
e er
osio
n
cont
rol)
; P
oll
uti
on
pre
ven
tion p
lan i
n-
adeq
uat
e or
inc
om-
ple
te (
04.5
.1)
1.
Inad
equat
e tr
ainin
g
for
envir
onm
enta
l
CO
S3
(3 •rH
fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
trai
nin
g i
n p
ollu
-
tion p
rev
enti
on
.
(04
.1.3
.R)
2.
No
or i
nco
mp
lete
mas
ter
list
ing o
f al
l
haz
ardous
sub-
stan
ces.
(O4.
10.1
.R)
3.
Inad
equat
e po
llu-
tion
pla
n.
(04.
1.4.
R)
1. I
nad
equ
ate
man
-
agem
ent
and o
r-
U5
be • PH
•PH
fa
1.
N
o or
inad
equat
e
wri
tten
po
llu
tio
n
pla
n.
(04
.1.4
.R)
<;
S g tiJO t3
(3 •pH
fa
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te
mas
ter
list
ing
of
all
haz
ard
ou
s su
b-
stan
ces.
(O4.
10.1
.R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
Haz
ard
ou
s W
aste
Min
imiz
atio
n P
ro-
gra
m.
(O4.
10.2
.R)
3.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
regula
tions.
(04.2
.1);
No
or i
n-
adeq
uat
e haz
ardous
was
te m
inim
izat
ion
pro
gra
m.
(04
.10
.2)
1. N
o or
in
com
ple
te
file
of
envi
ron-
•IH a 0 H
Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
P2
Oth
er E
nv.
Issu
es:
114 ERDGCERLTR-01-34
CO
lac C
b£ CD
"5 n
be
c
E CD
C
Q.
"o C O
-£> 3
CN
iri
o
CD 44» 3 3 cr CD
T3 3 3
£ CD
i—!
IC
O
CD
3 3 CT CD
-3 3 3
CD
'> u CD CO 3
3
1
CD CD
bC
< !- O o. a 3
£ i—i
i-H
in O
CD
3
3 a-
CD T3 3 3
3 o
4-J 3
'c
3 CD
C
S
3
CD
O ^4>
*^ 3 CD
3 4J
'p
E
p a.
"3
CD
o
oi ~
i CD
.3 ,3 -3
"3 CO
tc £
b£
'S • FN CD
P
3 p
en
ö
3 a* CD
+4>
CD 3 bo •_ o
o
CD a
o o
O o rv
o o
CD -u
CO
3 CD
o o
E E
3
£ a
£ 3 o
r^ "3 t. 3 3 .3 3
'-3 O
"C CD
3
CO
■5 «
g. id ■4->
3
'o to -*-} s 3 z w z 3 M CO £ z o O
u > CD p O 3
CD > s y
-3 o o
c CD
a 3 to
TI
CO
3 o
CD 44» a; 1
3
CO
3 _o
r* o ell 3 3
a. to a> ■£
3 S= t. 3 bfl CD •~
"3 -^ 3 CD
£
fee ö
to
"5 c c o CO •— CD
a
[>
O
ca 3 CT CU
a
4-3 CD
JO
c _o
3
C
co
o o CO <
3 -t-= CO a
+J u o a
(a 1-H
■>*
in O
o o
_S
o o z
> C CD
O
CD
s
£ i-i
O
CN CO
£ , 1 a be 3
«0
o
CM'
iri O
'S o o o
CD
3 CD <D
■5
3 CO
TJ 3 3
to 3
_o -+3" 3
G -3
CD
3 -u C CD
e 3 o i-
■> 3 CD
fee c
c
c o
'-£ 03 N
'S o
CB
3 O" cu
-a m
CD
3 O
GO
o o
3 CO
£ i-i
LO
4^" 3 3 cr CD
T3 m
"öS 3 3 o CO
£ i—!
io
to 3 be
CD a. 3
CN
3
3 § o p. O 3
CO
.2 CD O
i«
r to fee S3
• pH
T) ti •m
to
tan CO 3
-* C o 'S 3 CD
-44> C 3 3 S o
K fee c
• FH
ca
I cu S-.
-M c CO
T-J
3 SH
a> +J CB 3 cr
Ü CD
6 3 o s~
■>
% c c o
i-i
3 3 er CD
T3 3 a
CD CD
£ CD
■e
<D
s c o
3 W
CD
-u TJ 3 3 Si
O a 13 3 CD
s 3 o
pq i-i 00 in O
C 1-1 CD
-a 3 CD
t> u o o 0.
CD o
o w
ui ca 1-1 s-, iri o
z a CD
o a > CD
to £ y c CD
& a 3 J3 3 CO
3 CD to
CN CO
ti s
0< Fi 0 3
H o
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 115
00 s feJO Ö
• N
a fa st
affi
ng (
05.6
.l.R
);
No
or i
nad
equat
e
env
iro
nm
enta
l
trai
nin
g a
nd
awar
enes
s
(05.7
.2.R
);N
oor
inad
equat
e ev
alua
-
tion
of
envi
ron-
men
tal
trai
nin
g
nee
ds
(05.
7.3.
R);
No
or i
nad
equat
e
do
cum
enta
tio
n o
f
trai
nin
g (
05.7
.4.R
)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
tio
ns
(PM
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
in-
adeq
uat
e la
beli
ng;
no n
otif
icat
ion
of
serv
ice
cont
ract
s;
impro
per
sto
rage
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
revi
ew o
f pe
stic
ide
con
trac
ts
d • IN
d fa
1. N
o or
in
adeq
uat
e
man
agem
ent
of p
es-
tici
de r
egis
trat
ion
(PM
.1.2
); I
nst
alla
-
tion d
oes
no
t m
eet
mea
sure
s of
mer
it
(PM
.l.l
l.R
);
(PM
.45.
10.R
)
d -0 d
•r*
fa
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
revi
ew o
f pes
tici
de
contr
acts
.
(PM
.1.7
.R)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and
loc
al
regula
tions.
(PM
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
visi
-
ble
spil
l);
App
lica
-
tion
of re
stri
cted
use
pes
tici
des
by
«5
be d
d • PN
EM
1. N
o or
in
adeq
uat
e
revi
ew o
f pes
tici
de
con-
trac
ts.
(PM
.1.7
.R)
be d
d • IN
fa
1.
Pes
tici
de
appl
ica-
tors
are
no
t ce
rti-
fied
. (P
M.5
.1)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
man
agem
ent
of p
es-
tici
de
regis
trat
ion.
(PM
.1.2
)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
revi
ew o
f pes
tici
de
contr
acts
.
(PM
.1.7
.R)
o
0
Pes
tici
des
Mgt
.
116 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
00 s & bß S3
fa (PM
.1.7
.R)
3.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
file
of
pest
icid
e
reg
ula
tio
ns
(PM
.l.l
.R);
No
Pes
t
Man
agem
ent
Coo
r-
din
ator
(PM
.l.3
.R);
No
or i
nad
equat
e
Inst
alla
tion P
est
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n
(PM
.1.4
.R); I
nst
al-
lati
on d
oes
not
mee
t
mea
sure
s of
mer
it
(PM
.l.1
1.R
); A
ppli
-
cati
on o
f re
stri
cted
use
pes
tici
des
by
nonce
rtif
ied f
acil
ity
per
sonnel
(PM
.5.1
.R); P
esti
-
cide
sto
rage
/mis
s-
ing
faci
liti
es n
ot i
n-
clud
ed i
n S
PC
C
(PM
.45.
1.R
); I
nade
-
quat
e pe
stic
ide
stora
ge
faci
lity
bo a
a fa
CO
bo n
a fa no
n-ce
rtif
ied
faci
lity
pers
onne
l.
(PM
.5.1
)
3. A
ppli
cati
on o
f re-
stri
cted
use
pes
ti-
cide
s by
non
-
cert
ifie
d fa
cili
ty
pers
onne
l.
(PM
.5.1
.R)
«5
bo fl
'S a
fa
be d
'S c
fa
o • r-c OH 0 H
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 117
GO «75
toe C
C fa (P
M.4
5.4.
R); M
obil
e
equip
men
t is n
ot
thoro
ughly
dec
on-
tam
inat
ed a
nd i
s
not
labe
led
"CO
NT
AM
INA
TE
D
WIT
H
PE
ST
ICID
ES
"
(PM
.45.
5.R
); N
o or
inad
equat
e se
curi
ty
fenc
ing
(PM
.45.2
1.R
);N
oor
inad
equat
e si
gns
at
pest
icid
e m
anag
e-
men
t fa
cili
ty
(PM
.45.
26.R
); N
o or
sep
arat
e ven
tila
tion
syst
em
(PM
.45.
29.R
)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
tio
ns
(PO
.3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e
seco
ndar
y co
ntai
n-
tic Ö
•p*
• PH
fa
1. N
o or
inad
equat
e
SP
CC t
rain
ing
(PO
.5.7
); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e sp
ill
con-
tain
men
t an
d
«0
tic (3
•PN
a fa
1. L
ack
of o
r in
ade-
quat
e sp
ill
con-
tain
men
t an
d
clea
nup m
ater
ials
.
(PO
.20.
1)
tifi c
c •PN
fa
1. N
onco
mpl
ianc
e w
ith
stat
e an
d l
ocal
reg
u-
lati
on
s.
(PO
.3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e
was
hra
ck)
; Inad
e-
tic ö •»*
a fa
1.
No
copy
of
SP
CC
.
(PO
.5.1
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
SP
CC
tra
inin
g.
(PO
.5.7
)
0 H
to
O PH
118
CO .05
be c
• PH
d
CD .05
b£
a fa
«5 .05
bx d
• IN
d
•IH
PH o
« cu
.CD "p a.
CD C
'S c <u
"5 c o
a o o o
55
._ JO
3 o 55
01
s S cn <H
'S- 5 i
io O
3 > AC 3 CO
a cu CO
O OH
CD CO C O a en .—
-a CD
T3 C3
c o
•Q
O cu
a 3 a-
cu -O 3 c
c 01 £ c
a E a. 3 c CO CD
Z j ^ .S -*
Q -£ ^ 1—4 c ■—> Cd O ,- CO ° 3 P 5 i:
1^ 3 +J ^-^ 05 3 tfj
£ CD 3 O" CO
3 CU LO
be d
fc ^H 3
c O
•p* 3 ö '*-" -0 d
fa
C
CU d a.
o o
55
CU Ü CO
cu o CO
CC 3 a* <D
-Ö CO c
CO
IO
d Cu
0)
CO
a* w' T3 O 2 Cu
bo AC -S c a £ .2
o o
55
cu o CO
CO
CO 3 cr
co a
c 01 > o> •- a
CD en c o a.
en T3
• r* CO
IO
d cu
CD J3
CO
'> 4) S-,
PS IN io
O Cu
o> ü to Ü
CU CO
CO 3 cr 0)
X) CO G
f~ o o
55
bo C
t> Ü IO Ü CU CO
O PH
Ö o> £ a) bo CO c CO
C CO s-
T3 01 tn 3
CO e. rt *-*-s
IO CO
d Q Cd CO
o o
C o
Sn CD
CO
io' CXI
cu r^ XI d r/i be
c ,0 cfl
o en
PH
!H
4)
o a
en en
i O
CD C '« H-»
C CO
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
T3 o rt< -fc-a 0)
s T3 s_
<n CO c 0)
be
3 cr CD
cfl c
01
CO
of 3
CO
0) > o CJ
a
'S '3 er
o 3
O •- T-H
•rt •^ .o ■ ■ a o H3 d
S-H
o o
Ö CO
01 en Cfl
S 3
co
d fa 55 a
V u ^ 0) PH
i« c 41 o
S T3 0)
ClH
b£ CD
en r;
CD -t~) en CO
o u C o
55 a o o E= -C -o
-t-> o o CO o oi c n
3 be be d
55 ^ <D •— _c C/J
c o
cfl a
be c
d a c o
55
3 cj o
0)
en E 3 SH
be o t. a
Ct- o
io CO CN a
d g 5S I
CN
C O
3 a
be c o >>
-3 ,^ Ctf
3 a c o
55
3 IO J-. CN be _• p O a S
CM
c bo "- c c ~ o o
+J >> 3 <I) a - o 3
-4-> IH n 3 a (1) 3 +J
O 3 55 en
IO CN
d CO
en E 3
o a
c o
3 a
t- 3 a c o
55
be _C
u o>
"cfl CJ O
01
cn .
E 1 3 *0
2 ° a 5S
CN
en 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 119
CO
a 'S d
•PH
fa pli
ance
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
-
tions
(SO
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
over
flow
ing
dum
p-
ster
; im
pro
per
man
agem
ent
of
regula
ted m
edic
al
was
te)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
trai
nin
g o
f per
sons
han
dli
ng o
r m
anag
-
ing s
olid
was
te
(S0.
1.4.
R); N
onpa
r-
tici
pat
ion i
n
stat
e/lo
cal
recy
clin
g
pro
gra
ms
(S0.2
5.1
.R);
Open
dum
pin
g i
s pr
ac-
tice
d at
the
faci
lity
(SO
.35.
20)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h st
ate
and l
ocal
regula
tions
(ST
.3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e
feJD d'
d • lH
fa stat
e/lo
cal
recy
clin
g
pro
gra
ms
(SO
.25.
1)
3.
In
adeq
uat
e so
lid
was
te s
tora
ge
(SO
.10.1
.R);
Noor
inad
equat
e m
ark-
ings
on
food
was
te
conta
iner
s
(SO
.10.
4.R
)
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
US
T r
emov
al
(ST
.95.
1.R
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
bo d
d • IM
fa sonn
el n
ot
peri
odi-
call
y in
form
ed
about
mat
eria
ls
proh
ibit
ed f
rom
disp
osal
.
(SO
.10.
3.R
)
2. I
nad
equat
e m
ark
-
ings
of f
ood
was
te
conta
iner
s.
(SO
.10.
4.R
)
1.
Inad
equat
e
spil
l/ov
erfi
ll p
rote
c-
tion
for
su
bst
an-
dar
d U
ST
s.
be d
d fa
<: 55
be d
• PM
d •r* fa so
nnel
are
no
t pe
ri-
odic
ally
info
rmed
about
pro
hib
ited
mat
eria
ls.
(SO
.10.
3.R
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
insp
ecti
ons
of in
-
du
stri
al s
hop
was
te
rece
pta
cles
.
(SO
.10.
2.R
)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
mar
kin
gs
on f
ood
was
te c
onta
iner
s.
(SO
.10.
4.R
)
1.
Inad
equat
e U
ST
clos
ure.
(ST
.95.
3);
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
0 H
Sto
rag
e T
anks
Mgt
.
120 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO
be a
a •** tr
ainin
g;
inad
e-
qu
ate
seco
ndar
y
conta
inm
ent; i
n-
adeq
uat
e le
ak d
e-
tect
ion)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
seco
ndar
y co
ntai
n-
men
t fo
r bu
lk s
tor-
age
tan
ks
(ST
.f).
l)
<
be ö
C
reco
rdkee
pin
g r
e-
gar
din
g U
ST
s
(ST
.90.
2)
3.
S
ubst
andar
d U
ST
s
not
upgra
ded
,
clos
ed,
or r
emov
ed
(ST
.25.
1)
1.
No
ML m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B e
quip
men
t
(Tl.
10.2
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
PC
B i
nven
tory
(Tl.
10.1
)
3.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
tio
ns
(Tl.
3.1
)
(i.e
., in
adeq
uat
e
PC
B m
anag
emen
t);
No
or i
nad
equat
e
50
be a
C
(ST
.30.
1.R
)
2.
Inad
equat
e U
ST
clos
ure.
(ST
.95.
3)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
US
T r
emov
al.
(ST
.95.
1.R
)
1.
No
ML
mar
kin
gs
for
PC
B e
qu
ipm
ent.
(Tl.
10.2
)
2.
No
PC
B i
nven
tory
.
(Tl.
10.1
)
3.
No
US
EP
A id
enti
fi-
cati
on n
um
ber
.
(Tl.
10.3
); I
nad
e-
quat
e st
ora
ge
of
com
bust
ible
mat
e-
rial
s by
PC
B t
rans-
form
er.
(Tl.
20
.4)
be a
a •IH
1. N
o M
L m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B e
quip
men
t.
(Tl.
10
.2)
be a
a
reg
ula
tio
ns.
(ST
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
unre
g-
iste
red s
tora
ge
tan
ks;
inad
equat
e
seco
ndar
y c
on
tain
-
men
t)
2.
Subst
andar
d U
ST
s
no
t upgra
ded
,
clos
ed,
or r
emov
ed.
(ST
.25.
1);
Inad
e-
quat
e A
ST
for
use
d
oil.
(ST
.125
.1)
1.
No
ML m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B e
qu
ipm
ent.
(Tl.
10.2
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
insp
ecti
ons
of P
CB
tran
sfo
rmer
s (>
500
ppm
).
(Tl.
20.7
)
U ft 0 H
Tox
ic
Subst
ance
s,
PC
B
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 121
00
• PH
S3 • PH
1.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
Inst
alla
tio
n A
sbes
-
tos
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n (
T2.
1.4.
R)
2.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
asbes
tos
surv
ey
(T2.
1.3.
R);
(T2.
2.3)
;
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h no
tifi
cati
on
requii
'em
ents
for
faci
liti
es t
hat
de-
mol
ish
stru
ctu
res
(T2.
5.1)
1.
Rad
on m
easu
re-
men
ts n
ot b
eing
done
acc
ordi
ng t
o
sche
dule
(T
3.1.
3.R
);
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
annual
rep
ort
s ar
e
bein
g su
bm
itte
d
IM S3
S3 • PH
dis
posa
l of
min
eral
oil
die
lect
ric
fluid
(Tl.
50.4
)
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te
Inst
alla
tion
Asb
es-
tos
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n(T
2.1
.4.R
)
2.
No
or i
nco
mple
te
asbes
tos
surv
ey
(T2.
1.3.
R)
3.
Asb
esto
s ac
tions
wit
h t
he
po
ten
tial
to g
ener
ate
fug
itiv
e
emis
sions
not
envi
-
ronm
enta
lly a
s-
sess
ed (
T2.
1.5.
R)
1.
Inco
mple
te r
ado
n
mea
sure
men
ts
(T3.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
wri
tten
rad
on p
olic
y
(T3.1
.14.R
);N
oor
inad
equ
ate
dat
a-
«0
g S3
• PH
S3 •PH
1.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e
asbes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
Inst
alla
tion
Asb
es-
tos
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n.
(T2.
1.4.
R)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
pro
tect
ive
equi
p-
men
t fo
r as
bes
tos
per
sonnel
.
(T2.
1.7.
R)
1.
Rad
on m
easu
re-
men
ts n
ot
per-
form
ed.
(T2.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or
inad
equat
e
mit
igat
ion o
f st
ruc-
ture
s.
(T2.
1.12
.R)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
US
S3
S3
1. N
o or
inco
mple
te
asbes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
R)
1
too S3
-0 S3
•PH
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
asbes
tos
surv
ey.
(T2.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or
inad
equ
ate
Inst
alla
tio
n A
sbes
-
tos
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n.
(T2.
1.4.
R)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
pro
tect
ive
equi
p-
men
t fo
r as
bes
tos
per
sonnel
.
(T2.
1.7.
R)
1.
Inco
mple
te r
adon
mea
sure
men
ts.
(T3.
1.3.
R)
2.
No
or
inad
equ
ate
mea
sure
men
t of
Pri
ori
ty 1
str
uc-
ture
s.
(T3.
1.4.
R)
•i-i a 0 H
Tox
ic S
ub-
stan
ces,
As-
bes
tos
Tox
ic S
ub-
stan
ces,
Ra-
don
122 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO 05
bfi c
•PN
• pH
fa (T3.
1.15
.R); N
on-
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egu-
lati
on
s re
gar
din
g
radon (
T3.
2.1)
1.
N
onco
mpl
ianc
e
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
regula
tions
rega
rd-
ing L
BP (
T4.
2.1)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h st
ate
and
loca
l
regula
tions
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
uii-
per
mit
ted d
is-
char
ge;
inad
equ
ate
reco
rdke
epin
g)
2.
Inad
equ
ate
anal
yti
-
cal
and s
amp
lin
g
met
hods
(WA
. 10.
5);
Dis
char
ges
that
wou
ld c
ause
pas
s
thro
ugh o
r in
terf
er-
05
be G
• PH
C • PH
fa
CO
1—i
CO EH
cu CO ca
1.
N
onco
mpli
ance
wit
h s
tate
an
d l
ocal
regula
tions
(T4.
3.1)
1.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
surv
eill
ance
of
storm
wat
er d
is-
char
ge
(WA
. 10.
4)
2.
Dis
char
ges
th
at
wou
ld c
ause
pas
s
thro
ug
h o
r in
terf
er-
ence
at
the
PO
TW
/FO
TW
(WA
.25.
1)
3.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
regula
tions
50
bl) c
• PN
• P*
fa long
-ter
m m
eas-
ure
men
t of
Pri
ori
ty
2 an
d 3
str
uct
ure
s.
(T3.
1.6.
R)
<;
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
surv
eill
ance
of
storm
wat
er d
is-
char
ge.
(WA
.10.
4)
2.
Intr
od
uct
ion o
f po
l-
luta
nts
in
to
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
2)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
syst
em f
or i
nves
ti-
gati
on w
ater
pol
lu-
tion
com
pla
ints
(WA
.1.3
.R);
Dis
-
be d
• PH
a fa
< fc 1.
In
adeq
uat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and o
rgan
i-
zati
on o
f pap
erw
ork
.
(WA
.1.2
.R); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e sy
stem
for
inves
tigat
ion w
ater
poll
utio
n co
mpla
ints
.
(WA
.1.3
.R);
Non
com
-
pli
ance
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
-
tions.
(WA
.3.1
); N
o
or i
nad
equat
e su
r-
veil
lanc
e of
sto
rmw
a-
bfi a
a •P*
fa
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
pre
par
atio
n a
nd
subm
issi
on o
f an
-
nu
al r
epo
rts.
(T3.
1.15
.R)
1. N
on
com
pli
ance
wit
h s
tate
an
d l
ocal
regula
tions.
(T4.
3.1)
(i.e
., p
ain
t
chip
ped
)
1.
No
or
inad
equ
ate
surv
eill
ance
of
storm
wat
er d
is-
char
ge.
(WA
.10.
4)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
syst
em f
or i
nves
ti-
gat
ion w
ater
pol
lu-
tio
n c
om
pla
ints
(WA
.1.3
.R)
3.
Intr
oduct
ion o
f pol
-
luta
nts
in
to
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
2)
u •F*
o H
Tox
ic S
ub-
stan
ces,
LB
P
cu ca
cu CO ca
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 123
CO
&
Ö
a fa en
ce a
t th
e
PO
TW
/FO
TW
(WA
.25.
1);
Intr
o-
duct
ion
of p
ollu
t-
ants
int
o
PO
TW
/FO
TW
(WA
.25.
2)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
tio
ns
(WQ
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
no
cros
s co
nnec
tion
cont
rol
prog
ram
;
inad
equat
e re
cord
-
keep
ing;
unc
erti
fied
oper
ator; i
nade
-
quat
e m
onit
orin
g)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
Wat
er R
esou
rces
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n
(WQ
.1.8
.R)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
reco
rds
of a
ctio
ns
tt) c
• PH
S fa (W
A.3
.1)
(i.e
., im
-
pro
per
fil
ling o
f
wet
land;
oil
/wat
er
sep
arat
or
mal
func-
tion
ing)
; In
troduc-
tion
of poll
uta
nts
into
PO
TW
/FO
TW
(WA
.25.
2)
1.
Inad
equat
e m
an-
agem
ent
and o
r-
gan
izat
ion o
f pa-
per
work
(WQ
.1.2
.R); N
o or
inad
equat
e su
rvei
l-
lance
of
publ
ic w
a-
ter
syst
ems
(WQ
.10.
2)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
reco
rds
of a
ctio
ns
taken
to
corr
ect
or
repai
r th
e dis
trib
u-
tion
syst
em
(WQ
.1.3
.R); N
on-
com
plia
nce
wit
h
«0
a
S •i-i fa ch
arges
that
wou
ld
caus
e pas
s th
rough
or i
nte
rfer
ence
at
the
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
1)
1. N
onco
mpl
ianc
e
wit
h s
tate
an
d l
ocal
reg
ula
tio
ns.
(WQ
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
no
cros
s co
nnec
tion
cont
rol
pro
gra
m;
viol
atio
n of
loca
l
plu
mb
ing c
ode)
1. L
ead
use
d i
n pi
pe,
sold
er,
or f
lux.
(WQ
.25.
1)
«5
be a
Ö • PH
fa ter
dis
char
ge.
(WA
. 10.
4);
Dis
-
char
ges
that
wou
ld
caus
e pas
s th
rough
or i
nte
rfer
ence
at
the
PO
TW
/FO
TW
.
(WA
.25.
1)
< fc
c "0 a fa
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and
loc
al
reg
ula
tio
ns.
(WQ
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
no
back
flow
pre
ven
-
tion
; in
adeq
uat
e
sam
pli
ng)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e
mo
nit
ori
ng o
f lea
d
and c
oppe
r.
(WQ
.50.
6);
No
or
inad
equat
e m
oni-
tori
ng o
f lea
d a
nd
copp
er.
(WQ
.78.
6)
0 H
Wat
er Q
ual
ity
124 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
CO
be c
-Ö Ö
•m fa ta
ken
to
corr
ect
or
rep
air
the
dis
trib
u-
tion s
yste
m
(WQ
.1.3
.R);
Noor
inad
equat
e w
ater
supp
ly d
istr
ibu
tio
n
syst
em m
aps
(WQ
. 1.4
.R); N
on-
com
plia
nce
wit
h
oth
er F
eder
al r
egu-
lati
on
s re
gar
din
g
wat
er q
ual
ity
(WQ
.2.1
; N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e pr
ogra
m
to r
educ
e ex
posu
re
of le
ad t
o ch
ildr
en
(WQ
.25.
1.R
)
be a
• PH
a fa st
ate
and l
ocal
regula
tions
(WQ
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
no
back
flow
pre
ven
-
tion
)
CO
be a
a fa
10
be ä
•PH
fa
be a
d fa
u •H
0 H
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 125
a
d
SH
01
1 3 > .2 O CB
^2 a) & s-
a>
fa
EC C o CO co
Ö _o 'co cn
I s? +J :
cr CÜ
T3 CB c
fa
o
© a CD
£ .S
<D -H3 SH
CB
cr
o o
SH o o
S5
SH
o a CD •- Ö 01
CD SH
o o SH
a O fa u
Pi
in oo
CD +J cB
cr o> -o CO
C •- o o
CO
Ö o
a) > SH
3 0}
0) a o
ft
3
P 5 m PH
o SH
a; CO
•Q cu
PH
"a o
SH
o o
3 bjo
SH
co a> u SH
3 O CO 0) SH
13 SH
3
OH
PH
o>
o
SH
a bo 0) SH
CO
CO Cu u SH
a;
c 3
SH
a o -
o
SH
01 -U CO
in
PH
O 3 o o ^ C '■+3
CO
u CO 01
CO -HS
SH
o o>
PH 3 o
c _cB
CD
SH
13 SH
3
tu GH
fa CO
H3 13 e
u as n a SH C -H3
S 73 TH o be C
-3
m C
o
C n
SH
CU T3
01 fa
3 o bo
CN
PH 5
CO CD
+3
C 01
£ _C o cB -H= -tn»
CN CO
d 'S d
c? o
-H>
c CD >
CO
a o
CD CO
2 fa cr <
bo g 'o bo Ö o
CH o CO
3
C CD SH SH
3 Ü
a 01
u -Ö SH <t> y, c a CD £ SH
o CB
CD CO
■U
c 01
O Ö
S CO
Ö 01 SH
(j
bo u CB CO
o
as o Ü
SH O CB
SH
3 i 1 -H>
PH a>
co CD CJ SH
3 o CO CD SH
■so«
■c o -H2 CO
PH )S
cB S O
CD
co 2 o cr S CD
TJ CB e
CB
ä -9
3 CO
CO CD
'■S cu ft o SH
O
SH
CD
CO
'So
ft PH
CN
«3J
d • IN
d
o
<N
"&
co C o
fa
-a to CD o SH
3 O CO CD
PH
13 3
-H> r-H 3 O
126 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO 05
S fa
3 3 a-
CU "3 3 C
4* o 3
E CO
CO Q co
o , co CO
n 1
be m 01 -t-" CO £ 'C "P 3 O s o
o a CD
CO 3 3 o Tl 0) C e CD ^^ 3 "o 0) 3
S- CO 2
be X) 3 1 ' CO
IT CT a; £0 c CU 43
CO ^ 3 42 F
I—1 "3 3 43 s
s u m 3 E s- rC o CO ^ 5 o -rt o ^ o n c o C
CO
CU
3 K o E
CN co
z 53 CU bo S
CD 3 c £
CU
CD
,~ aj S 6 CO CD
CO CO
0/ CO CU
3 CU
en o •~ ■Ji cr 3
E is ^H
<u 3 ^-^ CU CD > -a O 0=_ Ti en c 3
-t-> P* r$ -a 3 3 CO E c. — ■* c o 3
o o
03 N 3
43 H- o
t—1 •- o O
T5 SH
CS N a
43
a c CU
£
CD
CO
C
c
'■5 CO 3
.05
a
0
SH
a> 43 O
43
T3 SH
CO
bo CD s_ co c o
2 a
C o
CU SH
"co SH
CD T3
CD fa
CO
3 o
% - CO CM
3°E
CD
CO 3 CT /-N CD CM
CO .s s E
CO CO a CO
SH
o
4<i u cfl
42 CO
£ £ CO
CO
3 cr CD
CO
c
in CO
E
ü c
CO o CD be CO
>> o c CD > c
CO 3 cr CD
-3 CO
3
o o
CO CO
£ CO
3 o
"3 SH
CO N CO
43
T-i
E
c CU
*H
CD
CO
3 cr CD
CO c u> o o
25
CD bD 3 C 3
co 3
CO
3 o IH 3 N 3
45
1 o c 3
HH LH 3
« 4= o
CO o co CU
TH tl co
^ ü 3
3
K ^~
3 3
O
CU
o 3 o
T-H
a 3 3 3 T-H
3 CD
P
a1
CD T3 •c
CU X
Oi
a • pH
fa
o
in CO
42 3
3
3 3 cr cu
3 3
r3
o
ffi .ts * .2
3 bo cu u CO
3 O
43 3 ä
CD u a u
CD 6 "cO bo o L. 3 u <1) SM (-J Tt o o CO fc fa
CO
3 o
3 CN
3°E
-u O 3 \Z cr AC cu (M
'S -H .S S a
(M
Si o
tu o
CJ 3
CO
CO
CO O CO
3 _o +3 3 C
-3 o o CJ
3 3 cr cu
3
3
| 'S B 3
3 M
« as
3 42
o
CD ^ "3 CC
'« >n
IM
CD
43
CO
X
42 3
E 3 C
o o
CD bo 3 s- o CO
CO b£ 3
3 42
C CD
3 3 cr
3 3
O
o
I CD bo crt
O o .3 'C CD
3
E
CD SH
3 co CD
3 3 F co'
o c
U o SH a £
CD
CO
c 3
> CD
CO £ o
3
3
£ 3 o
3
CO
3 o
CD
3 3 a* 4)
3 & CO
3 o
< CD SH
3 CO CD
3 43
>>
u 3
-3 O SH
P- -a a. T) -a 3 In . 3 s- 3
o < CD
3 N c 3 3
N £ 3 *-> CO
3 43 E In
o 3
43 5 CD SH
C CO
ft
co
[3 'SH
CD
3
co 3 o
T3 SH
3 N 3 K
ft
co 3
co 3 o
-3 SH
3 N 3 X
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 127
CO
C
d
1.
No
or i
nad
equat
e N
atu
ral
Res
ou
rces
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n(N
R.1
.5.R
)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e gro
und
mai
nte
nan
ce (
NR
.lO
.l.R
)
3.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
surv
ey o
f
endan
ger
ed a
nd t
hre
aten
ed
spec
ies
(NR
.20.
1)
d
d • PH
1. C
urr
ent
stat
us
of o
ngoi
ng
agre
emen
ts o
r en
forc
emen
t
acti
ons
not
exam
ined
(NR
.1.1
); N
o or
in
com
ple
te
file
of n
atu
ral
reso
urc
es
regula
tions
(NR
.l.l
.R);
Nat
ura
l re
sourc
es a
re n
ot
or a
re i
nad
equat
ely m
an-
aged
to
sup
po
rt t
he
mil
itar
y
mis
sion
whi
le a
lso
pro
tect
-
ing
and e
nh
anci
ng r
e-
sour
ces
for
mu
ltip
le u
se,
sust
ain
able
yie
ld,
and b
io-
logi
cal
inte
gri
ty (
NR
.1.9
.R);
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
reg
ula
tions
regar
d-
ing
nat
ura
l re
sourc
es
(NR
.2.1
) d
d •IN
(HW
.1.5
.R); N
o or
ina
de-
quat
e re
po
rt o
n H
AZ
MIN
effo
rts
(HW
.1.6
.R); I
nad
e-
quat
e co
nta
iner
s fo
r st
ori
ng
haz
ard
ou
s w
aste
(H
W.3
0.2)
1
0. 0 H
CG CU U
O co CD
K "öS
03
128 ERDGCERLTR-01-34
i CO
bo c 'S
K £ T—i
bo CO
PH
2 to a)
+J _e CD
CO
c J3 "a o
CO
ß o
'55 _3 "u
Q.
a. a
to
SI D a
CD
O £
CD en
'o ß CD
2
CD 1-
3 T3
CD O
"o _CD
CD
CD
T-i
CN o CO
fi o
CD CD
CJ CO
CD
jfi
£ CO
CO
_CD
CD
CD w ^ a < a CO 3 O s '-D 3 "S Q a Ö 0 OH — ß T-H CD ft ^-v e c3 CD CD S
o CJ
T3
C C*H
£ oci
Cu cj
3 CO
u r^ S CJ O
T3 Ctj
c ß
Pi Ö T-H
o
C
3 to: CD SH
-a
c
CO
CO
CO CD CJ
C
fa O
o
o c o
'-0 O
be cu a O
CN
o o o 2
CO
"o u o o
T-i
>> T3 3 CO
1- O
O
s s o CJ
T-i
oq O
O
o
CO
CD CO
'3 c
o o
r*3
a
._3 en
CO
3 o
CN
a
r ca S- bo CD
0)
§• CD
bo fi '3 c
'S O
ß
£
s o ej e SH
o o 2
1 m
< PH
<*-
c CD
s- 3 a
£ r-H
5: bO c '3 bo c
C3
—> C a s CD p .5 "5
1-H
t—<
O -c
CD
ß
s ca X
N
o 1—1
CD +n C3 3 O" CD
Pi CO
1-5
CD CO
'o ß CD
Cfl
3 cr CD
CD '- 3
13 CD o O u a
o CD
T—<
CD
CD
S E o CJ
_ß
CO
C _© *4H ca
CD CJ
fi _C0
s £ o o c o 2
C8
1 CD
13 s- CD
T3 CD
&H
CD to
'o C bo C
-3
bo c 'c
CD CD u CJ CO
CD 4-> cS 3 cr CD
en
3 o
-a
a N ca
"o CD
£ CO
T-i
CO
o
PH
"o CD
s CD
S 6 o CJ
•IN
(3 oq
o <n
t—<
«3
T-H
T—1
g o
"o CO
CD
S- O
CO
CD
o ß
-a ca O
T3 C3
_ß fi £
Ö T-H
1 CD 1-,
£ T—i
CD
-C o
,fi
JH ca bo ^ <U J^H >H ^1
c CO
3
CO
eo CD CJ
C ca
fa o o
o ß
_o r-i o
0) -4-> 0) s
CO
ß o 4J
3 a CO
C CD
s
CO
ß o
■-
o o 2
>. 3 CO
o o 2
"a, 6 o u
T-i
<M'
O o o 2
CD CO
'3 c
T-i
O
en CM
C CN
•B S o o
ca sx
a CO
X! 3 eo
o o
2;
T-i i-H <N CO T-H oi
N Ö
1-H o HH
CD
Cfl £ M 3
a" CO
fl CD T-i
C3 c4 ß O
■^ N—^
fa
< £
o o
T-I
>> T3 3 CO
< 2
CO ID 3 CO CO M
CD en
PH
• PH
o 2 Pi
F-H
& C CD in en
0 s Ö o SH
'> fi H
SH
CO
CD
3 CO CO
> fi w
CD
CD
3 CO en
F-H
> c w u CD
o £ o o
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 129
CO
be a
a •IM
reg
ula
tio
ns
(03.1
.l.R
)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e pre
lim
i-
nar
y a
sses
smen
t an
d r
eme-
dia
l si
te i
nv
esti
gat
ion
(03.1
.5)
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te m
aste
r
list
ing o
f al
l haz
ardous
sub
stan
ces
(04.1
0.l
.R)
2.
Inad
equ
ate
man
agem
ent
and o
rgan
izat
ion o
f pa
per-
wor
k (0
4.1
.2.R
)
1.
No
or i
nco
mple
te f
ile
of e
n-
vir
onm
enta
l re
gula
tions
(05
.1.1
.R)
2.
Inad
equat
e en
vir
onm
enta
l
trai
nin
g (
05.7
.l.R
)
3.
The
EP
R-M
rep
ort a
nd
be d
d
regula
tions
(03
.1. l
.R)
3. C
urr
ent
stat
us
of o
ngoi
ng
agre
emen
ts o
r en
forc
emen
t
acti
ons
not
exam
ined
(03.1
.1)
1.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e m
aste
r
list
ing
of
all
haz
ardous
subst
ance
s (0
4.10
. l.R
)
2.
Inad
equat
e m
anag
emen
t
and o
rgan
izat
ion o
f pap
er-
wor
k (0
4.1.
2.R
)
3.
Pro
cure
d p
roduct
s not
mad
e fr
om r
ecov
ered
sol
id
was
te (
04.1
.5.R
); N
o or
in-
adeq
uat
e H
azar
dou
s W
aste
Min
imiz
atio
n P
rogra
m
(O4.
10.2
.R)
1.
Inad
equ
ate
trai
nin
g f
or e
n-
vir
onm
enta
l per
sonnel
(05.
7.1.
R)
2.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e fi
le o
f en
-
vir
onm
enta
l re
gula
tions
(05.1
.l.R
)
pH
be d •**
d
1.
Inad
equ
ate
man
agem
ent
and o
rgan
izat
ion o
f pap
er-
wor
k (0
4.1
.2.R
)
2.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e m
aste
r
list
ing o
f al
l h
azar
do
us
sub
stan
ces
(04.1
0.l
.R)
1.
No
or i
ncom
plet
e fi
le o
f en-
vir
onm
enta
l re
gula
tions
(05
.1.1
.R)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
reg
ula
tions
regar
d-
ing
pro
gra
m m
gt.
(05.
2.1)
;
o p. 0 H
CM eu co CD
CO CO
)—1
>' C
u CD
o
s a cd bo o '«
PH
cö CD
CO co
i—i
>' Ö w
SH
CD
X, o
130 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO 05
tu a
a
en en CD o o -a
-U) CO i- o a. s* o
c
cB be be
OH C
bo C '2 C
"p. >■>
s <
CD
-Ö 3
c ca
be c
d i—t
ui O
c o c
CO
-a
o en ;- cu a.
Q O Q
i
c o
c o CO I.
CD O 13 a
© en
en Xi
XI CO cu cp .S
a a <
a. a < CO <u
3 o
CD
a CD en 3
~Ö CD
•c en CD IM
= 0M
XI CD
S- CD o
I
C o c
OH
CD c c o en
c3 3
CD 0.
cr en CD
X) en CD u >>•
K ca 7-1 U CD m IM £3 in o o s £ a uu
(M
.05
be a
'S d
.05
d
'S d
IM CD
N3
CD u C C3
C o
C CD SH a be C
ca IM
ca 3 cr CD xi ca e
o
CD
c Ö O en SH CD
cp ca
CD s Ö o IN
MM
o
- o
o o C
o c CD IM C3
b£ C '2 Ö ca "a
e IM
< o
X5 CD
CO !N
CD be
XI 3
-Q
XI C ca
be c 6 E be o
PS
d
O
be c
CD
'> CD
ca 3 a* CD
X) ca c
o o 2
o C
>> C H->
x! o m IN CD en CD CD +J i
CD a Q O Q
+J X) a
en o ce SH
M-J
U
'E MJ en a> In
o
u o c >»
MQ
en
CB
"a a <
+3 en CD
P. <1>
'o .2 T-H
iri C CD ri en x) o ^_^ C X) o rH 3 CD
c c o CO
CD
'G '-£
en CD O.
<X
rH
OH
CB u
"a a
<:
CJ
en CD
a CD en 3
e X)
CD
«
CD U
lO
s 0M
1—.
CD c
xi CD
Ü
■c M-> en CD IN
«M
CD O i
C o c
< 2
ft s
en CD
X)
en CD
MM
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 131
Ö • PH
Ö • PH
bo Ö
• PH
Ö
O OH
o o CO
>> a. o o o
55
s. s .o cö
cd ^Q
a 2 *J cö 3 er CD
-a cö 3
o o
T3 CD
3 ^J JH W O SH
+J O CD ft co
Tl O UH 3
er CO
bo 3
cö
ü co
u 3 O SH ft
2 #
o
O CU
(M
C o
CO
CD
a 3 O" CU
TJ CÖ
.3
SH o o
55
a 3 c cö
-2 "3 T3 C CÖ
-4-3 s CD
o CU
Ö cö
~ n .2 o CM
d CO
5 es •3 'C
CÖ 0)
ü ü cu CO til o >> ft o o o
55
CÖ
3 er CU
cö ,3
o o
55
Ö cö
HO cö 1H CU > o u CU SH
TT CU
o CU !H
3 <-*
2 H +J o
-3 '3 er
o co
•— ü cu 3
S o S ft
.OS
Ö • PH
'S c
•1*
o
T3 SH ö
,o CÖ M-H
Ö cö
ft CU
CÖ
3 er CU
TJ cö
_e SH o
3 ^-~ j» PS 2 H
+-> o
ft £ s 2 3 ö er tn
—" u CU 3
» 1 £ ft
s bJO 3
s ^ o
+3 cö ft
o >> u CU SH
i—l
w' CN
lö o
O co
cö ft 3
in
s o CÖ cö
55 CG &
03 CÖ
co
cö 3 er cu
T3 cö G
CN
#
O w cu bo cö SH o
o c
"ö> 3 3 o co tl CD ft 3 o
3 o
-Q cö
T3 CU
.S o
CD &
13 ^ "~ ö
cö u J2 ■" -2 -3 o
cu ft
co
o ft CO
-3
3 o
cö ft
3 ft 3 o
55
o SH ft bo
_s 'S >> u cu SH
SH
CU
o
-3 SH
CO bo CD SH
co 3 o
3 u o 'S
in CN
d co co
s 3
<N
d co
co <u
2 ä
& 55
cu
CU
CO
O co
ho 3
cu ft CO 3
cö 3 er CD
T3 CÖ
3
SH O
o 55
o H3 co
13 •c +j co 3
-3 3
co
3 O
ft
l-J O
3 _o '•Ö 3 ft u
■■6 3 ft 3 o
55
o SH
ft bo
_S 11 ä> cu 1H
13 u o
'S 3 3
u ft o CO r;
.2 ™ s « cö C
in CN
d 02
3 er cu
3 3
■|H SH O
CO
3
3 C*H O
to
co r, C
55 -J
3 o
co cö
Ja « " 3 CÖ >—t
ft ^ » « CU CN u ö CO 3 o
CO
CN
ft
cu -u co 3
co
cö ft O o ■ CD CN
i: ©
o co
(Tl CÖ O V,
CD
CÖ SH
CD S ft +J
3 n O n X!
CÖ cu T) 3 CU 3 o co SH
s SH
c2 CD ft 3
o CtH
CD
CD T3 cö
_G
SH o o
55
«
2 d
3 SH SH O u
H-l o 3 o
*4J cö SH
CÖ ft CD CO
CU
3 3 er
in CN
d co co SH CU 3
3 o u
•Ö cu
+3 3 bo
X co 3
£ +j
CD cö u 3 3
hr cö CD ^ SH
ft -.. s CO
o o o 3 Tl u
55 3 3
s^ cö
3 o u CD CO
cö 3 er cu
-3 cö 3
SH
O O
55
3 3
CD u 3 .2 r—H ft s o u 3 o
55
ft
co
3 3
EH
CD bo 3 SH o -u CO
132 ERDCCERLTR-01-34
IM a
d fa
(ST
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
no U
ST
clo
-
sure
docu
men
tati
on;
unre
g-
iste
red s
tora
ge
tanks; n
o
reg
istr
atio
n c
erti
fica
te
post
ed)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e se
cond
ary
conta
inm
ent
for
bulk
sto
r-
age
tanks
(ST
.5.1
); D
rain
-
age
wat
er i
s no
t tr
eate
d
pri
or
to d
isch
arg
e (S
T.5
.3)
1.
No
ML m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B
equip
men
t (T
l.10.2
)
2.
No
insp
ecti
ons
for
>50
0
ppm
PC
B t
ransf
orm
ers
(Tl.
20.7
)
3.
No
or i
nco
mp
lete
fil
e of
PC
B r
egula
tions
(Tl.
l.l.
R);
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
ann
ual
PC
B d
ocu
men
t lo
g
(Tl.
15.1
); P
CB t
ransf
orm
-
ers
pose
an
expo
sure
ris
k to
food
and f
eed
(Tl.
20.1
);
PC
B t
ransf
orm
ers
are
not
regis
tere
d w
ith t
he
fire
de-
K d
T3 d fa
age
tanks
(ST
.5.1
)
2. N
o or
inad
equat
e re
leas
e
dete
ctio
n fo
r U
ST
s
(ST
.60.
1);
Inad
equ
ate
US
T
clos
ure
(ST
.95.
3)
1.
No
ML m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B
equ
ipm
ent
(Tl.
10.2
)
2.
Curr
ent
stat
us
of o
ngoi
ng
agre
emen
ts o
r en
forc
emen
t
acti
ons
not
exam
ined
(Tl.
1.1)
; N
o or
inco
mple
te
file
of P
CB r
egula
tio
ns
(Tl.
l.l.
R)
i—i
two d
• pH
d fa
(ST
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
unre
gis
tere
d
stora
ge
tanks)
2. N
o or
in
adeq
uat
e re
cord
-
kee
pin
g r
egar
din
g U
ST
s
(ST
.90.
2)
1. N
o M
L m
arkin
gs
for
PC
B
equ
ipm
ent
(Tl.
10.2
)
o a 0
CQ O OH
TT 01 o C C8
03
o E-1
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 133
to o
i CO C
CD
s
ca o c
CD CO s CN 2 1
CO 13 +J
CD
.a I
CO CD >>
-4J co cd bo '5 10
0) +J CD CD CO ca be 'C i—i > •—'
<N d
CO ca CD •*—,
«
CO
C w
he, ca c ca
CD
CD
Cü' CJ
c CD
CO
ca CD
s G o
CO
G o
CD
o •c CH
CO H
CO
s CD co
CD
3 CO
CD
CD
ca HH oa 0> JH
I-i
CN
G ca
CD o X) r-i ca o CD ca - ca 5
s
C •-H
fa
rH
C
s u ca a
'S s o o C
• I-I
SH
o o
55
CO
1-i
CN"
>> CD > SH
3 co
'S, £ o o
.G
SH
o o
55
CO o CO CD
HO CO
< G
£ o Ü
a
3 o Z
'x CD
CD
O
G _o *-£
§ 2 +J CD
'S rH G -.; o w CD EH
"O ^^
5 ° ca +J
ca s-, CD
CD
'S s o CJ
G
CO EH
CO -4-S
G CD
s CD - G
3 cr CD
T3 ca C
o o
-t-3
C CD
s CD - 3 co C3 CD
s
3 +J CJ
2 -u CO
CO
no G ca
3 C5- CD
-Ü ca G
•r-l
« O o
r?
3 CJ
3 SH
CO
O
G
'-13
CN rH i-i co' EH
3 CT CD
ca tG
•- o o
55
S SH
O
CO
s CD CJ
c _ca
< i-i CN CO r-i CN 55 rH
CO o CO o
1
cd F—H
'S G CD
s CD
CD >
+3
CD
-1 CD ft CO o
I CO ca
CD CO ca
^2 ca
I ca
o 1-i
ca !H ca ft
1
G ca
«4-t o
G _o
CO
£ '53 >
CO
r CO CS
4) y—*
«
CO
C r—1
a>
C03 ca G ca
O SH
a CD
CO CD
co
CD
S G CO
ca
CD
CD
CD
co EH
CD S-H
ft CD
id
i-i 3 CO
CD
T3 SH
CD
ca fa a> s ^ ca ca £ o
1-i -4-> ca CD to
G _o '-C ca
r-H
G o
T3
ca CO •rH
CO
CO
t- o
ca 1UQ
-0
3. s o u
CO
i-i
CN
'S, s o Ü
CO o co CD
i-i CN
3 cr CD
T3 ca
c2
G CD
s
1—i
CN EH
ca
CD
CD
CO EH
CO
3
CD
ca
T—, ft s o CJ
3
CD
c3
s rQ 3 CO
3 cr CD
ca
s SH
o CO a _e
>> a
CO _G r—, ft G
CD
s CD S-
3
_G CD i—1
.0 G ■ f-,
13 G
ft CD .g H_
o fa Si
o o
55
a?
3 CO
u o o
55
Ö
+3
G ca
EC
o o
55
ft '3 CT CD
'S G G o CO
s o u c
l-H
o o
i-i
CO EH
o o
O o
55
ca
G o
• r-,
u
"ca 3 G
<! 55
o o
55
CD CJ
G
i-i CN CO i-i CN CO r-i
-u , "Ö3 ,
2
1
ja i—«
cd CO
Ö i—t
G a> s at be
ö
CO o -ri CO CD
X! CO cd
G
t- o o
55
'3 a" CD
CD
G G o CO SH
CD ft
CO ca CD
s &
S CD
CO
CO
'S a SH
CD
C3
s* CD cB CD eq +3 CO o a CO CD rv, +->
co
-u CJ o *J G
bo o 'S 'S CO
CD
o CO CD C3
rH
CO
ca 3
o +3
•i-i
•1H fa
s o u a u o
o co CU
co < G o
'-Ö
i-i CN EH
G
£ o u
_G
SH
O
i-i CN
>> CD >
ft CD
-t-3 C3 Ö CT
CO
ca
c2
a i-i
CD
CD
'S s O
EH
CO *a
G CD
s
CT CD
T3 ca
_G
o
ca
+3 CO CD >
_G
o 55
CS o co
CD
ca CD
s CN EH
u G
CD
3
55
o 55
SH
c2
r-i CN 1-i i-i
CO o CO G CD o
PH u CO a PQ
• pH < Pi HH
0 H
co" 0) CJ
G C3 -u CO
co" CD u G ca +j to
^2
to" CD CJ
G ca co
42
ft
SH
CD
ca 3 3 3 co K) co u o CJ
CD -t-9
'S 'S 'S cd o o EH
o EH £
134 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO 05
be a
-a a
fa
char
ge
(WA
.10.
4)
2.
No
or i
nad
equat
e sy
stem
for
inv
esti
gat
ion w
ater
pol
-
luti
on c
om
pla
ints
(WA
.1.3
.R)
3.
Nonco
mpli
ance
wit
h s
tate
and l
ocal r
egula
tions
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
inad
equ
ate
mai
nte
nan
ce;
un
per
mit
ted
dis
char
ge;
in
adeq
uat
e se
c-
ondar
y c
onta
inm
ent)
; In
-
troduct
ion o
f poll
uta
nts
into
PO
TW
/FO
TW
(WA
.25.
2)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h st
ate
and l
ocal
reg
ula
tions
(WQ
.3.1
)(i.
e.,
inad
equat
e
lead
sam
pli
ng;
no b
ackf
low
pre
ven
tion;
viol
atio
n of
MC
Ls)
2.
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
reco
rds
for
publ
ic w
ater
syst
ems
(WQ
.30.
1)
3.
No
or i
nad
equat
e re
cord
s
be d
d •** fa
char
ge (
WA
.10.
4)
2.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h s
tate
and
loc
al r
egula
tion
s
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
inad
equat
e
imp
lem
enta
tio
n o
f st
orm
-
wat
er p
oll
uti
on p
reven
tion
plan
; unper
mit
ted d
is-
char
ges;
inad
equat
e m
ain-
tenan
ce;
no
nco
mp
lian
ce
wit
h p
erm
it r
equir
emen
ts)
3.
Intr
oduct
ion o
f p
oll
uta
nts
into
PO
TW
/FO
TW
(WA
.25.
2)
1.
Non
com
plia
nce
wit
h o
ther
Fed
eral
reg
ula
tio
ns
regar
d-
ing
wat
er q
ual
ity (
WQ
.2.1
);
No
or i
nad
equ
ate
reco
rds
for
publ
ic w
ater
syst
ems
(WQ
.30.
1)
2.
No
or i
nco
mple
te f
ile
of
wat
er q
ual
ity r
egu
lati
on
s
(WQ
.l.l
.R); N
o or
in
ade-
quat
e re
cord
s of
act
ions
l—I
be d
d fa
luti
on c
om
pla
ints
(WA
.1.3
.R); N
onco
mpl
ianc
e
wit
h s
tate
an
d l
ocal
reg
ula
-
tions
(WA
.3.1
) (i
.e.,
inad
e-
quat
e m
ainte
nan
ce);
No
or
inad
equ
ate
surv
eill
ance
of
sto
rmw
ater
dis
char
ge
(WA
.10.
4)
3 £
0 H
"d 3
u
d
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 135
05
fcfi d
d • »-4
fa
for
com
munit
y w
ater
sys
-
tem
s (W
Q.4
0.1)
IM d
•PH
T3 d
fa
tak
en t
o co
rrec
t or
rep
air
the
dis
trib
uti
on s
yst
em
(WQ
.1.3
.R)
p-1
d •PH
d fa
o & 0
136 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix I: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for Army National Guard
Topic Finding
Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(AE.3.1) (i.e., open burning; inadequate labeling; cold
cleaner lids left open; unpermitted discharge) Class 1
2. No or inadequate CFC/Halon annual report.
(AE.85.1.G) Class 3
3. Lack of or inappropriate refrigeration recovery and
recycling equipment. (AE.90.5) Class 1
Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National
Register. (CR.5.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate ICRMP. (CR.5.1.G) Class 1
3. No or inadequate preparation and implementation of
anHPP. (CR.1.6.G)C7ass3
Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(HM.3.1) (i.e., inadequate labeling; inadequate flam-
mable/combustible storage; inadequate hazardous ma-
terials inventory; visible spills) HS
2. Containers of hazardous materials are not correctly
labeled, tagged, or marked. (HM.1.3) HS
3. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations.
(HM.2.1)flS
Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Inadequate or lack of characterization of wastes.
(HW.10.1) Class 1
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(HW.3.1) (i.e., improper disposal of fluorescent light
bulbs; uncharacterized waste; inadequate mainte-
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 137
Topic
Natural Resources Mgt.
Other Environmental Issues: NEPA
Other Env. Issues: Noise
Other Env. Issues: IRP
Other Env. Issues: P2
Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt.
Finding
nance; disposal of hazardous waste at an unapproved
facility; no designated accumulation point) Class 1
3. No or inadequate written hazardous waste manage-
ment plan. (HW.1.3.G) Class 3
1. Inadequate management of dust, runoff, silt, and ero-
sion debris. (NR.10.9.G) Class 3
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(NR.3.1) Class 1 (i.e., POL spills; inadequate erosion control)
3. Lack of or inadequate INRMP. (NR.1.3.G)CZass3
1. NEPA not integrated into planning. (01.5.1) Class 1
2. No or inadequate implementation of NEPA. (01.1.3.G) Class 1
1. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure.
(O2.1.10.G)CZass3
2. No or inadequate ICUZ study. (02.1.3.G)C7ass3
3. No or inadequate ICUZ committee. (02.1.4.G) Class 3
1. No or inadequate screening for past use of hazardous
substances. (03.1.3.G)C7ass3
1. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous sub- stances. (O4.10.1.G)CZass3
2. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete. (04.5.1) Class 1
3. No designated P2 POC. (04.1.12.G); No or inadequate
budgeting and implementation of hazardous waste
minimization and pollution prevention. (O4.10.4.G)
Class 3
1. No or inadequate EQCC. (05.1.6.G) Class 3
2. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations.
(05.2.1) Class 1
138 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Topic Finding
Pesticides Mgt. 1. No or inadequate disposal for all excess pesticides.
(PM.55A.G) Class 3
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(PM.3.1) (i.e., uncertified applicator; improper storage)
Class 1
3. Government pesticide applicators not certified.
(PM.5.1.G) Class 3
POL Mgt. 1. No or inadequate ISCP. (P0.5.3.G) Class 3
2. No or inadequate spill containment and cleanup mate-
rials. (PO.20.1) Class 1
3. No "USED OIL" label on containers other than tanks.
(PO.65.6) Class 1
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(SO.3.1) (i.e., inadequate maintenance; open dumping;
waste tire storage; improper disposal of regulated
medical waste) Class 1
2. Inadequate participation in state/local recycling pro-
grams. (S0.25.1.G) Class 3
3. Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid
waste. (SO. 10.1) Class 1
Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. No or inadequate secondary containment for bulk
storage tanks. (ST.5.1) Class 1
2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(ST.3.1) (i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate
USTs; inadequate recordkeeping; inadequate
spill/overflow protection; no UST closure documenta-
tion) Class 1
3. Inadequate maintenance of UST. (ST.95.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No ML markings for PCB equipment. (Tl. 10.2) Class
1
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management
Plan. (T2.1A.G) Class 3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 139
Topic Finding
2. No or inadequate asbestos survey. (T2.1.3.G) Class 3
3. Improper disposal of asbestos containing material.
(T2.15.1) Class 1
Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Radon measurements not performed. (T3.1.3.G) Class
3
2. No or inadequate measurements of Priority 1 struc-
tures. (T3.1A.G) Class 3
Toxic Substances, LBP v N/A
Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(WA.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted discharge; no operation and
maintenance manual for WWTP; inadequate secon-
dary containment; noncompliance with permit re-
quirements; inadequate maintenance; inadequate
stormwater pollution prevention plan) Class 1
2. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW.
(WA.25.2) Class 1
3. No application for industrial activity stormwater per-
mit. (WA. 10.3) Class 1
Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.
(WQ.3.1) (i.e., improper well closure; well near con-
tamination source) Class 1
140 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix J: Top Three Findings in Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for the Army National Guard
Topic Finding FY97 Finding FY98
Air Emissions
Mgt.
1. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations. (AE.3.1) (i.e.,
inadequate labeling; open burn-
ing)
2. No or inadequate CFC/Halon an-
nual report. (AE.85.1.G)
3. Knowing release of Class I or
Class II substance used as a re-
frigerant. (AE.90.3)
1. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations (AE.3.1) (i.e.,
open burning; cold cleaner lids
left open)
2. No or incomplete quarterly CFC
procurement report (AE.85.1.G)
3. No or inadequate emissions in-
ventory (AE. 1.3. G)
Cultural
Resources Mgt.
1. No or inadequate historic proper-
ties survey/National Register.
(CR.5.1)
2. No or inadequate ICRMP.
(CR.5.1.G)
3. No or inadequate preparation and
implementation of an HPP.
(CR.1.6.G)
1. No or inadequate historic proper-
ties survey/National Register
(CR.5.1); No or inadequate
ICRMP (CR.5.1.G); Effects of un-
dertaking on historic proper-
ties/National Register not taken
into account (CR.5.2)
Hazardous
Materials Mgt.
1. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations. (HM.3.1) (i.e.,
no discharge notification placard;
improper flammable/combustible
storage)
2. Containers of hazardous materi-
als are not correctly labeled,
1. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations (HM.3.1) (i.e.,
visible spills; inadequate hazard-
ous materials inventory)
2. Noncompliance with other Fed-
eral regulations regarding haz-
ardous materials (HM.2.1)
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 141
Topic Finding FY97 Finding FY98
tagged or marked. (HM.1.3)
3. Noncompliance with other Fed-
eral regulations. (HM.2.1); In-
adequate training in the trans-
portation of hazardous materials.
(HM.50.8)
Hazardous Waste
Mgt. 1. Inadequate or lack of characteri-
zation of wastes. (HW.10.1)
2. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations. (HW.3.1) (i.e.,
uncharacterized waste; inade-
quate recordkeeping; improper
disposal of fluorescent bulbs; haz-
ardous waste disposed to an un-
approved facility; improper
transportation of hazardous
waste)
3. No or inadequate written hazard-
ous waste management plan.
(HW.1.3.G)
1. Inadequate or lack of characteri-
zation of wastes (HW.10.1)
2. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations (HW.3.1) (i.e.,
inadequate recordkeeping; un-
characterized waste; no desig-
nated accumulation point; incom-
plete manifests; improper
transportation of hazardous
wastes)
3. Inappropriately operating as a
CESQG(HW.15.1)
Natural
Resources
Mgt.
1. Inadequate management of dust,
runoff, silt, and erosion debris.
(NR.10.9.G)
2. Lack of or inadequate INRMP.
(NR.1.3.G)
3. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations. (NR.3.1) (i.e.,
no permit obtained; inadequate
erosion control)
1. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations (NR.3.1) (i.e.,
visible spills; no permit obtained)
2. Inadequate management of dust,
runoff, silt, and erosion debris
(NR.10.9.G); No or inadequate
survey of endangered and threat-
ened species (NR.20.1)
Other
Environmental
Issues: NEPA
1. NEPA not integrated into plan-
ning. (01.5.1)
2. No or inadequate implementation
of NEPA. (01.1.3.G)
1. NEPA not integrated into plan-
ning (01.5.1)
Other 1. No or inadequate noise complaint N/A
142 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Topic Finding FY97 Finding FY98
Environmental procedure. (O2.1.10.G)
Issues: Noise 2. No or inadequate ICUZ study.
(02.1.3.G)
3. No or inadequate ICUZ commit-
tee. (02.1.4.G)
Other 1. No or inadequate screening for 1. No or inadequate screening for
Environmental past use of hazardous substances. past use of hazardous substances
Issues: IRP (03.1.3.G) (03.1.3.G)
Other 1. No or incomplete master listing of 1. Pollution prevention plan inade-
Environmental all hazardous substances. quate or incomplete (04.5.1); No
Issues: P2 (O4.10.l.G) or incomplete master listing of all
2. Pollution prevention plan inade- hazardous substances (04.10.l.G)
quate or incomplete. (04.5.1)
3. No designated P2 POC.
(04.1.12.G); No or inadequate
budgeting and implementation of
hazardous waste minimization
and pollution prevention.
(O4.10.4.G)
Other 1. No or inadequate EQCC. 1. Noncompliance with other Fed-
Environmental (05.1.6.G) eral regulations regarding pro-
Issues: Program gram management (05.2.1)
Mgt.
Pesticides Mgt. 1. No or inadequate disposal for all 1. No or inadequate Installation
excess pesticides. (PM.55.1.G) Pest Management Plan
2. Noncompliance with state and (PM.1.4.G)
local regulations. (PM.3.1) (i.e., 2. Noncompliance with state and
uncertified applicator; improper local regulations (PM.3.1) (i.e.,
storage); Government pesticide improper storage)
applicators not certified.
(PM.5.1.G)
POL Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate spill con- 1. NocopyofSPCC(P0.5.1)
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 143
Topic Finding FY97 Finding FY98
tainment and cleanup materials. 2. No or inadequate ISCP (P0.5.3.G)
(PO.20.1); No or inadequate 3. SPCC plan inadequate (PO.5.2);
ISCP. (P0.5.3.G) No "USED OIL" label on contain-
2. NoSPCC. (PO.5.1) ers other than tanks (PO.65.6)
Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Nonparticipation in state/local 1. Noncompliance with state and
recycling programs. (S0.25.1.G) local regulations (SO.3.1) (i.e.,
2. Noncompliance with state and improper management of regu-
local regulations. (SO.3.1) (i.e., lated medical waste; open dump-
open burning; inadequate main- ing)
tenance; waste tire storage) 2. Nonparticipation in state/local
3. Inadequate segregation of recy- recycling programs (S0.25.1.G)
clable materials from solid waste. 3. Open dumping is practiced at the
(SO.10.1) facility (SO.35.20)
Storage Tanks 1. No or inadequate secondary con- 1. Noncompliance with state and
Mgt. tainment for bulk storage tanks. local regulations (ST.3.1) (i.e., un-
(ST.5.1) registered storage tanks; inade-
2. Noncompliance with state and quate spill/overflow protection;
local regulations. (ST.3.1) (i.e., inadequate USTs; improper clo-
unregistered storage tanks; im- sure of UST)
proper UST closure; inadequate 2. (No or inadequate secondary con-
inspection) tainment for bulk storage tanks
3. Inadequate maintenance of UST. ST.5.1)
(ST.95.1) 3. Substandard USTs not upgraded,
closed, or removed (ST.25.1)
Toxic Substances, 1. No ML markings for PCB equip- N/A
PCB ment. (Tl.10.2)
Toxic Substances, 1. No or incomplete Installation As- 1. No or inadequate Installation As-
Asbestos bestos Management Plan. bestos Management Plan
(T2.1.4.G) (T2.1.4.G)
2. No or incomplete asbestos survey. 2. No or incomplete asbestos survey
(T2.1.3.G) (T2.1.3.G)
3. Improper disposal of asbestos
containing material. (T2.15.1)
144 ERDC'CERLTR-01-34
Topic Finding FY97 Finding FY98
Toxic Substances, 1. Radon measurements not per- N/A
Radon formed. (T3.1.3.G)
2. No or inadequate measurements
of Priority 1 structures.
(T3.1.4.G)
Toxic Substances, N/A N/A
LBP
Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and 1. Noncompliance with state and
local regulations. (WA.3.1) (i.e., local regulations (WA.3.1) (i.e.,
unpermitted discharge; inade- inadequate stormwater pollution
quate secondary containment; no prevention plan; unpermitted dis-
grease trap; inadequate mainte- charge; noncompliance with per-
nance; no stormwater pollution mit requirements; no grease
prevention plan) traps; improper closure of moni-
2. Introduction of pollutants into toring wells)
POTW/FOTW. (WA.25.2) 2. Introduction of pollutants into
3. No application for industrial ac- POTW/FOTW (WA.25.2)
tivity stormwater permit. 3. No or inadequate notification to
(WA.10.3) POTW/FOTW of discharges that
could cause problems (WA.25.3)
Water Quality 1. Noncompliance with state and 1. Noncompliance with state and
Mgt. local regulations. (WQ.3.1) (i.e., local regulations (WQ.3.1) (i.e.,
inadequate recordkeeping; im- improper well closure; well near
proper well closure) contamination source)
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 145
C
c Li. 0)
(0 o Q. 0) J2 CO
■D C (0 o >
o Q.
X
C 0) Q.
<
FYO
O
P/F
P
rH
CS
a
o
cS -u C3
TJ O
2;
FY
99
P/F
P
CN
CO
CS T3 O
55
CO
CO
o 2:
FY
98
P/F
P
•* ^
o o o
FY
97
P/F
P
00 o LO CO
o o
FY
96
P/F
P
o CN i-l
CO I-l
CN 1—1
CB
CS 13
O
55
FY
95
P/F
P
lO o
CO -*■> CB
O
55
FY
94
P/F
P
1—1
co" m
o LO
i> CO
CB
CB T3
O
55
FY
93
P/F
P CS
o 55
ID T—1
So CM
CB -4J CB
"Ö
O
55
FY
92
P/F
P cB
+J C3
T5 O
55
o CO
O
CB
CB T3
O
2
FY
91
P/F
P cd
-u CS
T3 O
55
CO
o
CB -u CB
O
2
s 0
CS N
• pH
(3 S*
o
s cu
_> +3 o <
CD > SH CD CO CD
>> s
<!
CS
o 1—1
CB Ö
_o '-Ö
CB
55 >> S
FY
00
P/F
P CB
CB
O
2
CN
in 00
CB -4-»
CB "Ö
O
2
CN
CN
CB
CB ~a O
55
CS
CS
o 55
FY
99
P/F
P
OS CN
ob
oo co
OS
CN
CS +J CS
-Ö
o 55
CN i—1
Ü5 ^ ■^
FY
98
P/F
P
CB
CB -o o
55
Tf
^
CB +J CB
O
55
CS
cB
O
cB
cB T> O 2
cB
cB
o 55
CS +-> CB
T3 O
55
FY
97
P/F
P
CN i—1
CN CN rH
o rH
CB
CB T3 O
55
CB -4-» CB
O
55
CB
CS T} O
55
CB
CB TJ O
55
FY
96
P/F
P
co" CO
CO
co *-H
CO
o rH
o rH
5! CO
o 00
FY
95
P/F
P
i—i CN
CO rH
CN
00" CN
OS CO
00
CB
CS
O
55
CB
CB T3 O
55
FY
94
P/F
P
ob" rH
So rH
co o CN
CB -4-i CS
O
2
CS
CB T3 O
55
cB +J CB
13
O
55
CS -4J CS
T3 O
55
Act
ive
Arm
y
Maj
or
Co
mm
and
O
o o o
ü
o En
Q
O Ü Q
Ü
m 5
<3
CO
r3
146 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
CO ■*-) *-> CO o
i TJ> 2 -c 2 ~ Tf
T- — +
CM o 2 2 ~c
CO CM
CO co 00 *-> „ «j w
05 o 2 ■o 2 •3
o
CS _ +
<35 o 2
o 2 -a OS
00 5C 00 1 C~ t- X CM
£ W ~H co co
£ + 00 ■tf o CN
^ CM
t> i Tf< t> TT cc
s s .-H CM in o
(/> 05 CO ~H 05
D> m m O
C + CO CO o t-
■o CO ,
00 <35 o 2
cS cs
co
CO c T—( t> -a CM
■ MM
LL + oo o en n ^H CM 2 -n ^H
0) > o CS CO
■ ■Mi
C3 «5 in
CN CD CO 2
cs -a CM
Ö) o + OS
CM »—t o
2 CS
cs -a
o CO
z CM CM in
CS 4-j CM
(0 •<* T—1
CM o CO 2
cs 05 CN
3 £ (0 + CO t> T—<
o 2
*-> cs
O 05
O t- i-H "Ö 1-H
> ' o 2
CS
cS T3
OS 00 o
2 cs CS
T3
0) 00 o 1—1
0 > + CS
in CS w ■■■■
2 CS 00 CS 00
+* T3 »—t 2 -o !-<
o 1
2
CS
CS o 7—1
05 o 2
CS ■4-»
CS T!
o 1-H 05
Q. + o
2 CS
-t-> CS O o
CS -t-3 CS o
13 C^ 2 -o »
■ ■ CS CS
—■ i o 2 CS
13 in m
o 2
*-> cs
10
X ■ ■Hi
■o + o 2
CS
CS T3 CO
o 2
CS -^ CS
T3 co
c 0 ■
Q. Q. <
a ö es 0 on a
CD
C <D C en C CD < P4
CS c
>> o
!* CS
<d 2
U CS 3 Ü
01 "a 0
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 147
■ o S Tf 05 o $ ■* o S o 5 c» o
i * 3 CO 00 H X 4j t>
T3 245 eo o
+ 55 £ t> <M i-H 243 ■* 5 - 2-S
CO
OS i i
o CO
05 o CO
o 1—1
r- i—i 55 « ^ -a tM
C5 m
r-t eo o
+ CD co i-H i-i i—i 2-3 i—i 00 «0
05
s* o 5- O +j o S o 5 o S © GO
■ in *4j ^ -a 2~g Z4j w
+ 5-8 o.2 o S n rt o n 55 «s ^ T3
oo Z4j 55 * Z£ 55 =ö X
t- i i
CM CM
oo CO CM
CD CO
5 * *4j
O -M CM X
£ £
+ CO co CM CM
5- T3 2-§
i-t n
o i> oo CM o rH in CO © X iH
IM (M TH o> CO O i-H CO CO m 1-1 1—i (N 1—1
+ o i-H CO
05 i-H 1—1
i—l oo 50
l-H
w i ■
in OS
oo
o i-i oo
o CM co
o CO 1—1
►2- ^4j
©
I©
+ oo CO t> o i-H ,o3 o5 Si CM <* co i-H i-H *-3 ^4j 0<l
■*
i CM CO
C5
o i-H *4J £-8 24j
O *j eo CM
CM
+ m ■* co 5* oS oS o5 eo CM CO CM *4j Ä fg *4J ^4J t>
a 0
•i-i -M 53 s
§ o Q
a u Ü O <: cc O Ü
O Ü co £ 3 g g 2 K O Q H CO CO O
^ H fa s S E3 53 H
148 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Appendix M: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Active Army
This chart indicates the areas where the predominance of noncompliance find- ings occur and how that can change from FY to FY (of positive/of negative). Posi- tive Findings include all findings originally classed as Positive plus those reclas- sified as False Positives.
The Active Army data include AMC, TRADOC, FORSCOM, MDW, MEDCOM, USARPAC, and USMA.
All Active Army
Topic FY94
VI-
FY95
VI-
FY96
VI-
FY97
VI-
FY98
VI-
FY99
VI-
FY00
VI-
Air Emissions 1/51 13/213 10/95 1/48 0/2 5/73 1/26
Cultural
Resources
2/53 6/84 15/86 3/38 1/0 7/52 7/52
Hazardous
materials
8/178 14/396 8/236 4/72 1/8 3/129 0/1
Hazardous Waste 13/458 10/313 4/173 1/92 0/6 1/119 3/65
Natural
Resources
2/78 9/81 15/50 3/39 1/2 9/34 2/19
Other Env Issues,
NEPA
3/54 8/69 4/29 1/37 1/0 7/27 2/7
Other Env. Issues,
Noise
0/24 10/46 13/33 2/10 No data 7/13 2/9
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 149
Topic FY94
P/-
FY95
P/-
FY96
P/-
FY97
P/-
FY98
P/-
FY99
P/-
FYOO
PA
Other Env. Issues,
IRP
2/3 1/7 4/24 2/6 No data 1/5 0/1
Other Env. Issues,
P2
1/7 2/9 8/10 6/12 1/1 7/18 0/1
Other Env. Issues,
Program Mgt.
10/38 13/64 18/68 5/16 1/0 16/37 3/20
Pesticides 3/79 4/206 4/173 0/133 1/5 5/104 1/52
POL Mgt. 10/320 3/182 3/152 0/78 0/14 1/83 1/31
Solid Waste 6/100 11/162 11/133 4/47 1/3 5/73 2/21
Storage Tanks 2/335 2/126 6/108 0/49 0/1 7/40 0/25
Toxic Substances,
PCB 2/36 1/60 1/26 0/20 No data 0/18 0/3
Toxic Substances,
Asbestos
4/84 2/61 0/66 0/28 0/2 3/31 0/10
Toxic Substances,
Radon
0/5 0/7 0/7 0/3 No data 0/8 0/2
Toxic Substances,
LBP 0/0 0/5 1/14 1/11 No data 0/13 1/3
Wastewater 2/159 10/259 3/194 1/92 0/8 2/109 0/41
Water Quality 2/60 10/190 17/172 1/85 0/5 2/107 3/51
150 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
AMC
Topic FY94
VI-
FY95
VI-
FY96
VI-
FY97
VI-
FY98
VI-
FY99
VI-
FY00
VI-
Air Emissions 0/28 4/29 1/13 1/9 No data 0/10 No data
Cultural Resources 1/40 1/32 0/8 0/7 No data 0/9 No data
Hazardous
Materials
3/32 2/21 3/16 0/16 No data 1/6 No data
Hazardous Waste 1/90 5/57 0/27 0/22 No data 0/11 No data
Natural Resources 2/41 1/20 0/8 0/6 No data 1/5 No data
Other Env Issues,
NEPA
2/50 3/33 0/9 0/6 No data 1/8 No data
Other Env. Issues,
Noise
0/14 1/9 1/0 No data No data No data No data
Other Env Issues,
IRP
2/1 0/0 1/6 0/2 No data No data No data
Other Env Issues,
P2
0/4 0/2 0/2 0/6 No data No data No data
Other Env Issues,
Program Mgt.
7/21 4/10 1/8 2/1 No data No data No data
Pesticides 2/53 0/36 0/33 0/40 No data 0/8 No data
POL Mgt. 0/23 0/34 0/34 0/15 No data 0/12 No data
Solid Waste 2/20 1/20 1/13 0/3 No data 1/5 No data
Storage Tanks 0/47 1/25 2/30 0/19 No data 1/6 No data
Toxic Substances,
PCB
1/26 1/28 0/13 0/9 No data 0/2 No data
Toxic Substances,
Asbestos
1/43 2/17 0/31 0/14 No data 0/9 No data
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 151
Topic FY94
PA
FY95
PA
FY96
PA
FY97
PA
FY98
PA
FY99
PA
FYOO
PA
Toxic Substances,
Radon
0/4 0/1 0/0 0/2 No data No data No data
Toxic Substances,
LBP
0/0 0/0 0/1 0/1 No data 0/1 No data
Wastewater 0/47 1/52 0/40 0/26 No data 0/23 No data
Water Quality 1/43 1/25 0/25 0/18 No data 0/12 No data
TOTALS 25/627 28/451 10/320 3/222 No data 5/115 No data
152 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
TRADOC
Topic FY94
P/-
FY95
P/-
FY96
P/-
FY97
P/-
FY98
P/-
FY99
P/-
FY00
P/-
Air Emissions 1/8 6/96 4/6 0/14 0/2 2/18 0/6
Cultural Resources 0/5 3/20 3/7 0/4 1/0 4/5 1/0
Hazardous
Materials
5/92 6/138 1/58 2/14 1/7 4/44 No data
Hazardous Waste 7/116 2/100 1/21 0/31 0/4 1/47 1/11
Natural Resources 0/17 2/23 5/12 1/6 1/2 4/4 No data
Other Env. Issues,
NEPA
1/2 1/14 2/6 1/9 1/0 1/9 1/0
Other Env. Issues,
Noise
0/4 5/10 3/9 0/4 0/0 2/2 No data
Other Env. Issues,
IRP
0/0 0/0 2/4 0/1 0/0 1/0 0/1
Other Env. Issues, P2 0/0 2/2 5/1 1/1 1/1 2/3 0/1
Other Env. Issues,
Program Mgt.
0/5 6/21 3/12 0/6 1/0 5/4 1/0
Pesticides 0/7 2/63 0/37 0/27 1/4 3/29 1/2
POL Mgt. 2/52 1/65 1/26 0/23 0/12 0/23 0/8
Solid Waste 0/30 1/74 1/22 1/19 1/3 3/18 1/1
Storage Tanks 1/64 1/31 2/19 0/13 0/1 2/14 0/3
Toxic Substances,
PCB
1/3 0/15 0/5 0/7 0/0 0/9 0/1
Toxic Substances,
Asbestos
3/8 0/24 0/6 0/3 0/2 0/8 0/2
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 153
Topic FY94
P/-
FY95
P/-
FY96
P/-
FY97
P/-
FY98
P/-
FY99
P/-
FYOO
P/-
Toxic Substances,
Radon
0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 No data No data
Toxic Substances,
LBP
0/0 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/0 0/4 0/1
Wastewater 0/22 4/90 2/35 0/24 0/7 1/43 0/7
Water Quality 1/13 1/60 2/39 0/30 0/5 2/31 1/11
TOTALS 22/447 43/849 37/327 6/238 7/50 37/315 7/55
154 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
FORSCOM
Topic FY94
P/-
FY95
P/-
FY96
P/-
FY97
P/-
FY98
VI-
FY99
P/-
FY00
P/-
Air Emissions 0/15 2/68 2/37 0/16 No data 1/5 0/8
Cultural Resources 1/9 1/23 12/38 3/18 No data 1/4 2/9
Hazardous
Materials
0/54 5/147 1/46 2/34 No data 0/6 No data
Hazardous Waste 5/252 1/105 1/57 1/33 No data 0/10 2/35
Natural Resources 0/20 6/28 9/12 2/23 No data 1/6 2/10
Other Env. Issues,
NEPA
0/3 0/17 0/4 0/21 No data 3/3 1/5
Other Env. Issues,
Noise
0/6 4/21 9/15 2/6 No data 2/3 1/7
Other Env. Issues,
IRP
0/2 1/7 0/10 2/3 No data No data No data
Other Env. Issues, P2 1/3 0/5 2/5 4/5 No data 1/0 0/4
Other Env. Issues,
Program Mgt.
3/12 1/18 7/12 2/7 No data 2/3 1/9
Pesticides 1/19 1/51 4.46 0/57 No data 0/9 0/28
POL Mgt. 8/245 2/49 1/42 0/32 No data 1/4 1/10
Solid Waste 4/50 7/48 4/43 2/21 No data 0/10 1/12
Storage Tanks 1/224 0/46 0/28 0/14 No data 1/3 0/12
Toxic Substances,
PCB
0/7 0/15 0/6 0/2 No data No data 0/2
Toxic Substances,
Asbestos
0/33 0/11 0/13 0/7 No data 1/0 0/3
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 155
Topic FY94
VI-
FY95
VI-
FY96
VI-
FY97
VI-
FY98
VI-
FY99
VI-
FY00
VI-
Toxic Substances,
Radon
0/1 0/3 0/0 0/1 No data 0/3 No data
Toxic Substances,
LBP
0/0 0/1 0/4 0/5 No data 0/2 No data
Wastewater 2/90 3/86 2/56 1/32 No data 0/10 0/15
Water Quality 0/4 3/61 5/44 1/30 No data 0/10 1/20
TOTALS 26/1049 38/791 67/483 22/367 No data 13/91 12/189
156 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
MDW
Topic FY95
P/-
FY96
P/-
FY99*
P/-
Air Emissions 1/17 2/9 0/16
Cultural Resources 1/4 0/11 1/12
Hazardous Materials 1/71 0/40 0/16
Hazardous Waste 0/38 0/23 0/24
Natural Resources 0/6 1/5 1/4
Other Env. Issues, NEPA 1/4 2/0 No data
Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/6 0/0 No data
Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/0 0/1 0/1
Other Env. Issues, P2 0/0 0/1 1/2
Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 2/13 2/12 3/9
Pesticides 1/42 0/16 1/21
POL Mgt. 0/24 0/11 0/19
Solid Waste 0/14 3/17 1/8
Storage Tanks 0/20 0/4 1/2
Toxic Substances, PCB 0/2 0/1 0/4
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/6 0/5 1/2
Toxic Substances, Radon 0/1 0/0 No data
Toxic Substances, LBP 0/1 1/1 No data
Wastewater 0/22 0/14 1/18
Water Quality 3/29 3/21 0/13
TOTALS 18/421 14/193 11/171
*There are no data for FY97 or FY98.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 157
MEDCOM
Topic FY95
P/-
FY96
P/-
FY99*
P/-
Air Emissions 0/3 0/10 1/1
Cultural Resources 0/5 0/4 1/4
Hazardous materials 0/19 0/29 0/1
Hazardous Waste 2/13 0/6 0/5
Natural Resources 0/4 0/4 0/4
Other Env. Issues, NEPA 3/1 0/2 No data
Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/0 0/0 No data
Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/0 0/0 No data
Other Env. Issues, P2 0/0 0/0 1/2
Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 0/2 0/4 0/4
Pesticides 0/14 0/17 0/14
POL Mgt. 0/10 0/10 0/6
Solid Waste 2/6 0/7 0/4
Storage Tanks 0/4 0/5 0/4
Toxic Substances, PCB 0/0 0/1 No data
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/3 0/2 0/5
Toxic Substances, Radon 0/1 0/2 0/2
Toxic Substances, LBP 0/1 0/0 1/1
Wastewater 2/9 0/19 0/8
Water Quality 2/15 1/8 0/9
TOTALS 11/110 1/130 4/74
*There are no data for FY97 or FY98.
158 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
USARPAC
Topic FY96
P/-
FY99*
P/-
Air Emissions 0/7 1/18
Cultural Resources 0/5 1/12
Hazardous materials 3/26 1/28
Hazardous Waste 2/19 1/21
Natural Resources 0/3 1/12
Other Env Issues, NEPA 0/5 1/6
Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/8 3/7
Other Env Issues, IRP 1/1 0/3
Other Env Issues, P2 1/1 2/9
Other Env Issues, Program Mgt. 1/11 3/13
Pesticides 0/14 0/29
POL Mgt. 0/14 0/19
Solid Waste 2/20 0/17
Storage Tanks 2/15 2/15
Toxic Substances, PCB 1/0 0/2
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/6 1/9
Toxic Substances, Radon 0/3 0/3
Toxic Substances, LBP 0/3 0/4
Wastewater 0/18 0/17
Water Quality 4/22 0/29
TOTALS 17/212 17/273
*There are no data for FY97 or FY98.
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 159
USMA
Topic FY96
P/-
FY99
P/-
Air Emissions 1/11 1/2
Cultural Resources 0/6 0/3
Hazardous Materials 0/15 2/16
Hazardous Waste 0/16 0/2
Natural Resources 0/3 1/1
Other Env. Issues, NEPA 0/1 0/1
Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/0 No data
Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/2 No data
Other Env Issues, P2 0/0 No data
Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 3/6 2/3
Pesticides 0/5 1/4
POL Mgt. 1/13 0/2
Solid Waste 1/10 0/9
Storage Tanks 0/4 No data
Toxic Substances, PCB 0/0 0/1
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/2 0/2
Toxic Substances, Radon 0/1 0/1
Toxic Substances, LBP 0/3 0/1
Wastewater 0/9 0/5
Water Quality 2/8 1/6
TOTALS 8/115 8/59
160 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
0
ü Q.
CÜ
C
0) >
(0 ö) 0
(0 3 0 </> > JL_ 0) 0 > 0)
0 0 £ DC
Ü- <
>- co a
0) «3
cö
o
« -U CO
£ 3,
cü
CD w o
X.
o
■n c
w O
0) >
03 O
co
CD CO CO
Sß « C ü
'S _ü> c
«3 CD o C
C •& •c o
^5 co S- bo £ .5 ° 'S C-> ä c S o *c c —
'S « CD
11 £ CO o ho CD Ä
& .£ CD fe
'S CD
CD 55 ä o
CO CO* CD u CO
CD
CO CD
-t-> ca
CD > cö bD CD Ö
CD >
T3 'S ^ X •1-H CO >
P -J3 I^M
cö
o _C0 F
Y(o
fp
lse
Posi
c 0 Q. Q. <
FY
98
P/-
CO 1—1
o 00 CN
CN
ö CO
o o
FY
97
P/-
CO CN
CN o
CN
CN
i> CD CN
i—l
FY
96
P/-
05 CN O
<o o
CN in CN
co I—1
o F
Y95
P/-
CN O
CN
o 1—1
ö o 1—1
o
FY
94
P/-
O in CO in
CO
oo i—i
T—1
o 1—1
FY
93
P/-
CO in co co
in co co in co
CN CN CN
01 i-H
FY
92
P/-
10 I—1
co co
CN CD i—I
CO
00 00
LO
5? co
FY
91
P/-
5 o
o o
00 o
CN i—1
CN
o o
co c 'co co
's •- < C
ult
ura
l
Res
ourc
es
Haz
ardous
Mat
eria
ls
CD
CO CÖ
CO
o T3 s- ca N ca
co CD O t~
o co 0)
ca
ca
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 161
FY
98
VI-
i—i
o CO
CN i—1
CN
o
i—l i—1
©
to r—1
o 5? o
CO
©
FY
97
VI-
Ö o <N
o 5! o
CO T-H
i-H
CO i—l
©
CO
o
o CO
io CO
CN
FY
96
VI-
9S o
CO
o ©
CT5 CN ©
LO CO
CO
JO o
©
CO
i-H CO
CO
«5 o o
1—1
o JO o
1-1
© ©
o 1-H
o LO
o © 1-H
FY
94
VI-
LO 1-H
<N
o CO i-H
©
oo CN
CN CO
o i—H
CN i-H
©
1-H i-H
eo CO CO
1—1 t> ■—
00
os CN
CM
CM o o 1-1
o5
© 1-H
i-H
i-H oo i-H
oS T-H
CN
CO CN
FY
92
VI-
1-H LO CO
c3
t-H t-l
CN CN
«5 LO i-H
?3
CN o
o i-H
FY91
VI-
o o
CN
©
© o
CN
o o © o
i-H
o ;s
o
0 H
'S ^<
^ 2 S CD •£) CD S > 3
13 c to O H Ä
13 C to
^ 2 s CD -S3 tu
M > 2 O W Ä
Ö A
s « ^ 9 m"
1 * § o ä M
"es
Ö CD Ö CM
>H 2 » 1 £ s 5 £ is
T3 S
S g St So CD o
1* u 2 «r
13 Ö co bo O H Ä S
co CD
U •I-H -M CO CD
PH
H-, o PH
CD
co CS
'o
162 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
FY
98
VI-
co o
o o
LO
Ö CO
Ö O
LO rH
O
CM
o rH
FY
97
VI-
rH rH
IN
CO
T—1
LO CO
o
00
o rH
o CO
o CD
o CN jo
CO
FY
96
VI-
CN
ö 05 1—1
rH
i-H
o
LO CO
Ö o o
o o
«s
00 CN
FY
95
VI-
o CN
Ö CN
©
o o
o © o
©
©
CO CO FH
FY
94
VI-
CO CN
LO
05 rH
CO
LO
T—1
CO
CN 1—1
©
CO CO
rH
CO o CO
rH rH
FY
93
VI-
CO
1 CO CO
rH
CO CO rH
CN rH
LO t>
CO rH
o o
CO
CO
CN
rH rH
OS t- rH
in CO rH
FY
92
VI-
CO co CN
ID T-l
CN
CO CD
c3
CO
o o o
CO LO rH
CO
«5 rH C35
rH
FY
91
VI-
CO
o rH
o 5! o T—1
o o o
co ©
o ©
JO CO
o
0
CO r* C CO
EH
CD be C3 (-, o
CO Tox
ic S
ubst
ance
s,
PCB
Tox
ic S
ubst
ance
s,
Asb
esto
s
Tox
ic S
ubst
ance
s,
Rad
on
Tox
ic S
ubst
ance
s,
LB
P
u CD
+-> c«
CD
CO cd
la
S-i CD
c3
CO
i o
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 163
Appendix O: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Army National Guard
This chart indicates the areas where the predominance of noncompliance find- ings occur and how that can change from FY to FY (of positive/of negative). Posi- tive Findings include all findings originally classed as Positive plus those reclas- sified as False Positives.
Topic FY97
VI-
FY98
VI-
Air Emissions 0/34 0/11
Cultural Resources 0/15 0/3
Hazardous Materials 0/14 0/5
Hazardous Waste 0/431 0/105
Natural Resources 0/44 0/10
Other Env. Issues, NEPA 0/57 0/8
Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/16 0/0
Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/19 0/1
Other Env. Issues, P2 0/8 0/1
Other Env. Issues,
Program Mgt.
0/3 0/1
Pesticides 0/34 0/2
POL Mgt. 0/447 0/82
Solid Waste 0/67 0/17
Storage Tanks 0/150 0/82
164 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
Topic FY97
P/-
FY98
P/-
Toxic Substances, PCB 0/1 0/0
Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/27 0/10
Toxic Substances, Radon 0/4 0/0
Toxic Substances, LBP 0/0 0/0
Wastewater 0/166 0/46
Water Quality 0/4 0/2
TOTALS 0/1541 0/386
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 165
LL 0 n (0 c o I*-»
(0 0 3 O
C 0 Q. a. <
s CO
bo o
OH
CO < O W >>
w be g Ö
«Ö
r2 Co Ö o • (—( to
C*H o r-l CD
3
'S o
«1
>
CO o a, be c
•rH
W
Cd cd o -*J -u
i CO iß
C3
O
55
cd "d
o 55
CO us
CO CO Si +3 +3 C35 -* CO cd -*
£ io TJ T3 w rH o O
55 1-4
Cd X +3
o r-l
Cd
o 55
CO CD 1-H
t»
as (M rH o
CO o F-t
CO CO +3
OS to
as ca
o 55
00 rH !-H
cd w +3 0) r-l cd <N
£ CO rH T3 CD I—1 O
55 l-H
Cd ■* +3
0) CO rH cd t~
B OS rH T3 o rH rH o
55 CO
Cd cd eo +J +3 05 Cd •* cd "*
B T3 co T3 CD O
55 CN o
55 CM
Cd cd cN +J +3 0» CO CO cd CO
£ TJ CO T3 eo O
55 T-< O
55 l-H
Cd cd rH +3 +3
OS CS cd
B O 55
in X) o
55
lO
a r-N
0 a> CS
cd >. 0
N fj ee ■u •F"C ^j a cd
bio > >> 1 'S 3 u • f-4 ä s s H O 3 «s 3 0 O
166 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
w
a CO
o O u o
>>
CD > cj <
«2 CO be C
'S Ö
id CD
r—H
CO C O
"-S CO 0)
cr
S-,
3
CD >
Cfi O o- bß C
X H
CO Cfl CO r* o +J +J -*J +J © cd
CO
cfl CO CO
I* ■a in T3 m T3 TJ c o O O o t*H £ £ 2 2:
05 CO
2 m <M in CT> Cfl oo 05 r* T—i CO T—1 i-H CN L O F*H £
CO CO CO CO CO -M +J -^ -u C3S CO CO CO CO
£ o CO o T3 TJ T3 T3
O O o o £ £ £ fc
C8 CO CO cfl t» +J +J -M
s e i—i 1—1 o CO
T3 CO cfl CO
O O o o fc £ £ fc
to cfl
S £
i—i i—i -<* 1—1
co
O
!M m T—1
CO CO »o -u +J
2 CO t> in CO oq 1—1
CO XI o
CO
o
co CO CO CO ■^ -(-> +J +J +J
S ^ CD CO
oo 00
o o i-H
Cfl X!
CO CO CO T3
E O O o o HH £ z z £
-a >> c
es H £
CD >
0 O o o
Ü a w s
o <J
-M ^ O Ü CU <
co 3 o
O Q i
CO CO O D CO
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 167
«s bß o SH a
CO < ü w s-
cS CD ft >> >>
CO be Ö
fi
CO Ö o
•l-H
CO cu
00 c© CO o i—i
. 00 l-H
OS CM
o 05
CO CO
o l-H
CO l-H
CM oo OS 00 o
i>
oo l-H
o o GO »ft
a 0
-t-i
eö N
• PH
C S5 be
O
>> s
a» _> +3 ü <
CD
I CO CO cu
I? SH
<
n Ö o
• -H
C3
s 3
CO
o
168 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
03 T3
K5 CM 1—1
00 I-H 05 CN CM CM i—1
C cö s s o
"* Q* CN
I—1 CD
CO 10
00 T—"
LO CD 1—(
■*
Ü s-, o a £ >>
05 00 CD
CD CD 1—1
O 1—t
CO T—1 Tf
CU > •43 O
<3 0? CO CO 10 O 0 •* O
SH O « 0) a. & >>
CN O CD I-H O 0 O O
-D 03 be C -o
•1—<
C b s iC S fi 0) < s
,0 CO c > u O 0 %
0 0 Q W
0 "■S fc O 0 d, < CO 2
CO ü 0
0
H
CO <& O Q
S CO
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 169
Appendix Q: Citations of Negative Findings
Management Practice (MP) versus AR/DOD versus Regulatory Negative Find- ings by ECAS Program.
FY Active Army Army Reserve Army Guard
10/90 - 9/91 (FY91) No data 6 MPs No data
No data 12 AR/DOD No data
No data 1 Regulatory No data
10/91 - 9/92 (FY92) No data 120 MPs No data
No data 203 AR/DOD No data
No data 52 Regulatory No data
10/92 - 9/93 (FY93) No data 176 MPs No data
No data 440 AR/DOD No data
No data 143 Regulatory No data
10/93 - 9/94 (FY94) 217 MPs 163 MPs No data
575 AR/DOD 475 AR/DOD No data
1481 Regulatory 405 Regulatory No data
10/94 - 9/95 (FY95) 256 MPs 7 MPs No data
576 AR/DOD 9 AR/DOD No data
1769 Regulatory 21 Regulatory No data
10/95 - 9/96 (FY96) 246 MPs 183 MPs No data
494 AR/DOD 272 AR/DOD No data
1231 Regulatory 349 Regulatory No data
10/96 - 9/97 (FY97) 95 MPs 35 MPs OMPs
170 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
FT Active Army Army Reserve Army Guard
296 AR/DOD 91AR/DOD 145 AR/DOD
563 Regulatory 31 Regulatory 145 Regulatory
10/97-9/98 (FY98) 7MPs 18 MPs IMPs
17AR/DOD 43 AR/DOD 14 AR/DOD
40 Regulatory 30 Regulatory 50 Regulatory
10/98 - 9/99 (FY99) 170 MPs No data No data
341 AR/DOD No data No data
640 Regulatory No data No data
10.99 - 9/00 (FY00) 57 MPs No data No data
128AR/DOD No data No data
248 Regulatory No data No data
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 171
CERL Distribution
Chief of Engineers ATTN: CEHEC-IM-LH (2)
Engineer Research and Development Center (Libraries) ATTN ATTN ATTN
ERDC, Vicksburg, MS Cold Regions Research, Hanover, NH Topographic Engineering Center, Alexandria, VA
Defense Tech Info Center 22304 ATTN: DTIC-0
6 3/01
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated -o 3vc^.io ' nc'-r zer rescor.50 ncJucmg :he t;me 'or reviewing instructions, searching e<!s:inn ;ri data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection o* -nforpvit'o^ So^d :cmrron;s regarding :h;s bürde estimate or any other ascec: of this collection y nicr-vi this burden to Department of Defense. Washington Headaua-ters Se-v^os O-ev^-aio 'or !-fcrma':o,n Operat'cs and Reports (0704-0188). 1215 Jef'crscn Oavs Hir.v 4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other ofovs<on c' 'aw no po'icn shall be subiect :o any penalty for failing to comply with a coiiect'O" ;' "" valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS
-"Q and maintaining the '.ggnstions for 'educing Vmgton VA 22202-
■~-r no! display 3 current'y
1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 03-2001
2. REPORT TYPE
Final 3. DATES COVERED (From - To)
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Environmental Compliance Assessment Data: Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's ECAS Program
5a. CONTRACT NUMBER
5b. GRANT NUMBER
5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
6. AUTHOR(S) Donna J. Schell
5d. PROJECT NUMBER 622720A896 5e. TASK NUMBER
5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER T20
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) P.O. Box 9005 Champaign, IL 61826-9005
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
ERDC/CERLTR-01-34
9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20314-1000
10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)
12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Copies are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.
14. ABSTRACT
The Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard have been conducting environmental compliance assessments since the late 1980s under the Environmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS). No analysis of the data generated to date had been done until the project reported here. This report summarizes the methodology used for an analysis of the data and the results ofthat analysis.
15. SUBJECT TERMS Environmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS) Environmental Management
Environmental compliance checklists
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF:
a. REPORT Unclassified
b. ABSTRACT Unclassified
C. THIS PAGE Unclassified
17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT
SAR
18. NUMBER OF PAGES
172
19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Donna J. Schell
19b.TELEPHONE NUMBER (in- clude area code)
(217)398-5544 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239.18