Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's EGAS Program - DTIC

^J- CO

I 1 T- o

I

p -J on Hi O o Q UL m

m c

J?1S C L.

LU O

O _j ■**

o JC 3 O Li. !■■ ** CS (A ö C (/) O 0) o a:

>n ,i"i Dß'^D |

.."."A'.'1!' I

US Army Corps of Engineers® Engineer Research and Development Center

Environmental Compliance Assessment Data: Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's EGAS Program Donna J. Schell March 2001

20010423 081 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Foreword

This study was conducted for Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers un-

der project 622720A896, "Base Facilities Environmental Quality," Work Unit

T20, "Compliance Data." The technical reviewer was Gary W. Schanche, Con-

struction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL).

The research was performed by CERL's Installation Division (CN), Environ-

mental Processes Branch (CN-E). The Principal Investigator was Donna J.

Schell (CN-E). The technical editor was Linda L. Wheatley, Information Tech-

nology Laboratory. Dr. Ilker Adiguzel is Branch Chief (CN-E) and Dr. John T.

Bandy is Division Chief (CN). Gary W. Schanche is the associated Technical Di-

rector. William D. Goran is Acting Director of CERL.

CERL is an element of the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Cen-

ter (ERDC), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Director of ERDC is Dr. James

R. Houston and the Commander is COL James S. Weiler.

DISCLAIMER

The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. All product names and trademarks cited are the property of their respective owners.

The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.

DESTROY THIS REPORT WHEN IT IS NO LONGER NEEDED. DO NOT RETURN IT TO THE ORIGINATOR.

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Contents

Foreword 2

1 Introduction 7

Background 7

Objectives 7

Approach 7

2 Environmental Compliance Assessment System 10

Active Army 10

Army Reserve 10

Army National Guard 11

3 Summary of Findings and Recommendations 12

Trends Analysis 12

Top 20 Findings of Noncompliance Across All Fiscal Years 12

Trends by Topic and Fiscal Year 76

Trends Across Topics 25

Numeric Analysis of Findings 25

Numbers of Findings 25

Positive Findings 26

Accuracy of Findings 26

Citations of Negative Findings 27

Pollution Prevention Solutions 28

No or Inadequate Characterization of Wastes (HW. 10.1) 28

Noncompliance With State and Local Wastewater Regulations (WA.3.1) 29

Noncompliance With State and Local Air Emissions Regulations (AE.3.1) 31

Noncompliance With State and Local Drinking Water/Water Quality Regulations (WQ.3.1) 31

Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Hazardous Materials (OSHA- based regulations pertaining to issues such as personal protection equipment [PPE] and eyewashes) (HM.2.1) 31

Noncompliance With State and L oca! Solid Waste Regulations (SO. 3.1) 31

Hazardous Waste Satellite Accumulation Point/Accumulation Point Limits Exceeded (HW.75.1) 32

Discharge of Oil Into or Upon Navigable Waters (PO. 15.1) 32

Inadequate or No Spill Containment and Cleanup Materials in POL Storage Areas (PO.20.1) 33

Noncompliance With State and Local Hazardous Waste Regulations (HW. 3.1) 33

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Water Quality (WQ.2.1) 33

Noncompliance With State and Local Storage Tank Regulations (ST.3.1) 33

Noncompliance With or Lack of State/Federal NPDES for Point Source Discharges (WA.10.1) 33

Discharges That Would Cause Pass Through or Interference at the POTW/ FOTW (WA.25.1) 33

Improper Storage of Compressed Gas Cylinders (HM.45.1) 33

Lack of "Used Oil" Label on ASTs (ST. 125.1) 33

Lack of or Incomplete MSDSs (HM.1.2) 34

Inadequate Management and Organization of Paperwork (05.1.2.A) 34

Inadequate Fire Protection for Flammable/Combustible Storage Areas (HM.35.9) 34

No or Incomplete Asbestos Survey (T2.1.3. A) 34

Appendix A: Installations/Facilities Included in the Data Analysis 35

Appendix B: Definitions for Fields in ACCESS Database 40

Appendix C: Keyword Index 46

Appendix D: Trends by Legislative Authority 56

Appendix E: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1994-2000 by Topic for the Active Army 59

Appendix F: Top Three Findings in Each Fiscal Year by Topic for the Active Army (FY 1994-2000) 77

Appendix G: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1991-1998 by Topic for the Army Reserve 100

Appendix H: Top Three Findings in Each Fiscal Year by Topic for the Army Reserve (FY 1991-1998) 104

Appendix I: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for Army National Guard 136

Appendix J: Top Three Findings in Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for the Army National Guard 140

Appendix K: Positive and False Positive Findings 145

Appendix L: Positive Versus Negative Findings 146

Appendix M: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Active Army 148

Appendix N: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Army Reserve 160

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Appendix O: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Army National Guard 163

Appendix P: Questionable Findings 165

Appendix Q: Citations of Negative Findings 169

CERL Distribution 171

Report Documentation Page 172

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

1 Introduction

Background

The Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard have been conducting environmental compliance assessments since the late 1980s under the Envi- ronmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS). No analysis of the data generated to date had been done until the project reported here. This report summarizes the methodology used for an analysis of the data and the results of that analysis.

Objectives

The objectives of this effort were to review the available Army environmental compliance assessment data to identify:

• Trends in environmental noncompliance • Whether or not the Army is resolving issues of noncompliance overtime • True problem areas versus perceived problem areas • Potential areas for research focus.

Approach

Step One: The first step was to obtain ECAS data from the Army Reserve, the Active Army, and the Army Guard. See Appendix A for a list of installations and facilities covered by the data. Data for Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98) and a portion of FY99 were not received until July 2000 and therefore had not been comprehensively analyzed at the time of this report.

Step Two: When received, the Active Army and Army Reserve data were in DOS format, which had to be converted into a Microsoft™ ACCESS database. See Appendix B for a list of data fields used in the ACCESS database and their definitions.

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Problems with the data included:

• Data that are pre-FY95 were developed without using TEAM Guide and

the Active Army Supplement. The checklist item numbers cited in this

data have been translated to the current TEAM Guide and Active Army

Supplement checklist item numbers. If the regulatory requirement no

longer exists, the finding was referred to the XX.2.1 checklist item number

in each TEAM Guide Section.

• Multiple findings. Findings based on Federal/state regulations and Army

Regulations (AR) were stacked together into one finding and marked as a

Class 01 finding. A commonly occurring example is the stacking together of

the findings for a Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC)

and an Installation Spill Contingency Plan (ISCP). In cases where it is ob-

vious which checklist items were joined, both checklist item numbers have

been indicated in the field. The class field was then edited to indicate that

two classes were involved.

• Mixed-up findings. Throughout the data are findings written up against

the wrong citation. When the finding description had enough detail, an

appropriate checklist item number was assigned. In some instances, how-

ever, there was not enough data or the data was confusing. An example of

the latter is a reserve center that has hazardous waste findings written up

for it under conditionally exempt small quantity generator (CESQG) check-

list item numbers, small quantity generator (SQG) checklist item numbers,

and treatment storage and disposal facility (TSDF) checklist item numbers.

Data in the finding description was insufficient to tell what type of facility

it really is. The findings in these cases are marked as Questionable.

• Edited checklist items. In some cases the assessors edited the text of the

checklist item to reflect an issue that the checklist item did not truly cover.

These findings are also marked Questionable.

• False positives. These are findings listed as positive for which the finding

description indicates simple compliance, not above and beyond. These find-

ings have been identified as FP.

• Unidentified facilities. The name of the facility assessed is not always in-

cluded in the data received from the Army Reserve. Instead of the facility

name, this field was often filled with the name of the assessment team.

Identifying the majority of the facilities was resolved by searching the Fed-

eral Facilities Identification (FFID) database. After searching the FFID,

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

•

however, facility names still could not be determined for SC2104SC007,

WI2104WI091, and WI2104WI0X1.

Confusion in the MACOM field. Active Army ECAS records have been

identified with the following Major Army Commands (MACOMs) that do

not seem appropriate for Active Army ECAS data: Corps of Engineers

(COE), Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), and Army Na-

tional Guard (ARNG). The COE data were from an assessment done at a

COE research and development (R&D) facility, the Cold Regions Research

and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL). The record was deleted. The

ARNG data were from a tenant facility and were removed from being

marked as an Active Army ECAS record.

• Root cause lists. The Army Reserve and the Active Army use the same root

cause codes, when they are used, but the Army National Guard uses a dif-

ferent list. Due to the inconsistency with which set of root cause codes was

used, and the inconsistency of whether any codes were used at all, it was

not possible to do a root cause analysis.

Step 3: All the data were indexed with appropriate keywords (see Appendix C) so that they are searchable by concepts.

Step 4: The data were reviewed by subject experts to identify existing or potential solutions to repeated problems.

Step 5: New data are incorporated as they are generated.

10 ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

2 Environmental Compliance Assessment System

To effectively review the ECAS data, it was necessary to first understand the ex-

isting processes and the variations across MACOMs. Some processes and proce-

dures are common to all three branches of the program, but there are variations

as well.

Active Army

The Active Army ECAS program encompasses all MACOMs except the Army Re-

serve and the Army National Guard. The program is administered by the U.S.

Army Environmental Center (AEC) but implemented by the individual

MACOMs.

Currently, the Active Army uses a DOS-based software to record its findings of

noncompliance. Typically, assessors perform site visits, write findings, and the

findings are reviewed by the installation.

The Active Army rates its findings by whether they are Class 1 (regulatory re-

quirement), Class 2 (future regulatory requirement), Class 3 (Army/Department

of Defense [DOD] requirement or management practice), or Health and Safety

(based on Office of Safety and Health Administration [OSHA] regulations).

Army Reserve

The Army Reserve ECAS program is administered by HQ U.S. Army Reserve

Command (USARC), but implemented by the 416th Engineering Command.

As with the Active Army, the Army Reserve uses a DOS-based software to record

its findings of noncompliance. Typically, assessors perform site visits, write find-

ings, and the findings are reviewed by the installation.

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 ^

The Army Reserve rates its findings by whether they are Class 1 (regulatory requirement), Class 2 (future regulatory requirement), Class 3 (Army/DOD requirement or management practice), or Health and Safety (based on OSHA regulations).

Army National Guard

The Army National Guard ECAS program is administered by ARNG- National Guard Bureau (NGB) and executed by one of three contractors selected by ARNG-NGB.

The Army National Guard uses software called WINCASS to record its findings of noncompliance. WINCASS is built in Power Builder. Typically, assessors perform site visits, write findings, a stringent quality assurance (QA) check is done by ARNG-NGB as well as a designated individual on the contract team, and all reviewed by the installation.

For the purposes of ECAS, the ARNG-NGB defines an installation as being all the facilities within a state.

The ARNG rates its findings by whether they are Class 1 (regulatory requirement), Class 2 (future regulatory requirement), Class 3 (Army/DOD requirement or management practice), and Health and Safety (based on OSHA regulations). Unlike the Reserve and the Active Army, however, it also assigns a measure of threat (Significant, Major, Minor).


3 Summary of Findings and Recommendations

Trends Analysis

The purpose of trends analysis is to identify recurring noncompliance issues. While there is similarity across the entire Army, the nature of facilities and mission also impact what noncompliance is found.

Top 20 Findings of Noncompliance Across All Fiscal Years

The first form of trends analysis done was to identify the most common noncompliance findings across all FYs in each of the three ECAS branches. The Class of the finding is indicated in italics.

• Active Army Top 20 Findings 1. No or inadequate characterization of wastes (Federal regulation; see

checklist item HW.10.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1 2. Noncompliance with state and local waste water regulations (state regu-

lations written under WA.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1 - 53 percent were related to NPDES issues - 34 percent were related to stormwater - 18 percent were related to point source discharges - 15 percent were related to washracks - 12 percent were related to treatment works - 5 percent were related to monitoring - 5 percent were related to vehicle maintenance - 2 percent were related to plans

3. Noncompliance with state and local air emissions regulations (state regulations written under AE.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1 - 39 percent were related to permits - 13 percent related to painting activities - 11 percent related to degreasers - 9 percent related to plans

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34 13

- 7 percent related to particulates

- 6 percent related to open burning

4. Noncompliance with state and local drinking water/water quality regu-

lations (state regulations written under WQ.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see

the appropriate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1

- 21 percent related to monitoring

- 14 percent related to backflow prevention

- 14 percent related to design criteria

- 12 percent related to wells

- 12 percent related to recordkeeping

- 4 percent related to reporting

5. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding hazardous

materials (HM.2.1) Primarily Health and Safety (OSHA)

6. Noncompliance with state and local solid waste regulations (state regu-

lations written under SO.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate

state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1

- 30 percent related to landfills

- 15 percent related to dumpsters

- 11 percent related to medical waste

- 8 percent related to construction/demolition waste

- 7 percent related to tires

- 7 percent related to plans

7. Hazardous waste satellite accumulation point/accumulation point limits

exceeded (Federal regulation; see checklist item HW.75.1 in the U.S.

TEAM Guide) Class 1

8. Discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters (Federal regulation, see

checklist item PO.15.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1

9. Inadequate or no spill containment and cleanup materials in petroleum,

oil, and lubricants (POL) storage areas (Federal regulation; see checklist

item PO.20.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1

10. Noncompliance with state and local hazardous waste regulations (state

regulations written under HW.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropri-

ate state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1

- 36 percent are related to the storage facilities

- 25 percent are related to labeling

- 23 percent are related to container management

- 13 percent are related to uncharacterized waste

- 6 percent are related to inspections

11. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding water quality

(WQ.2.1) Class 1

12. Noncompliance with state and local storage tank regulations (state

regulations written under ST.3.1 U.S. TEAM Guide; see the appropriate

™ . ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

state supplement for the actual requirements) Class 1 and Class 2, but

since the underground storage tank (UST) deadline has passed, what

was a Class 2 would now be a Class 1.

- 48 percent were related to USTs

- 26 percent were related to aboveground storage tanks (ASTs)

- 26 percent it was impossible to tell if the issue was an AST, a UST, or both

- 13 percent were related to release detection

- 12 percent were related to inspections

- 11 percent were related to containment

- 8 percent were related to recordkeeping

13. Noncompliance with or lack of state/Federal NPDES for point source

discharges (Federal regulation, see checklist item WA.10.1 in the U.S.

TEAM Guide) Class 1

14. Discharges that would cause pass through or interference at the pub-

licly-owned/federally-owned treatment works (POTW/FOTW) (Federal

regulation; see checklist item WA.25.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1

15. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (Federal regulation; see

checklist item HM.45.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Health and Safety (OSHA)

16. Lack of "used oil" label on ASTs (Federal regulation; see checklist item

ST. 125.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Class 1

17. Lack of or incomplete Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) (Federal

regulation; see checklist item HM.1.2 in the U.S. TEAM Guide) Health

and Safety (OSHA)

18. Inadequate management and organization of paperwork (Management

Practice finding; see checklist item 05.1.2.A in the Active Army Sup-

plement) Class 3

19. Inadequate fire protection for flammable/combustible storage areas

(Federal regulations; see checklist item HM.35.9 in U.S. TEAM Guide)

Health and Safety (OSHA)

20. No or incomplete asbestos survey (AR 200-1 requirement; see checklist

T2.1.3.A in the Active Army Supplement) Class 3

• Army Reserve Top 20

1. No or incomplete MSDSs Health and Safety (OSHA)

2. Incomplete radon measurements Class 3

3. No or inadequate asbestos survey Class 3

4. No or inadequate inventory of hazardous waste Class 3

5. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding hazardous

materials Class 1

6. No or inadequate Incompatible Use Zone (ICUZ) study Class 3


7. No or inadequate surveillance of stormwater discharge Class 1 8. No or inadequate coordination with the fire department Class 3 9. No or inadequate written hazardous waste management plan Class 3 10. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous substances Class 3 11. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management Plan Class 3 12. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations regarding air emissions

Class 1

13. Inadequate fire protection for flammable/combustible storage areas Health and Safety (OSHA)

14. No or incomplete file of environmental regulations Class 3 15. Inadequate flammable/combustible storage rooms inside of buildings

Health and Safety (OSHA) 16. No copy ofSPCC Class 1 17. No or inadequate plan for reclaimed, recoverable, and waste liquid pe-

troleum products Class 3

18. No or inadequate storage and handling of flammable/combustible materials Health and Safety (OSHA)

19. Inadequate flammable storage cabinets Health and Safety (OSHA) 20. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials Class 1.

• Army National Guard Top 20 1. No or inadequate characterization of wastes Class 1 2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations Class 1 3. No or inadequate ISCP Class 3 4. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials Class 1 5. No or inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage tanks Class 1 6. Noncompliance with state/local hazardous waste regulations Class 1 7. No "USED OIL" label on containers other than tanks Class 1 8. No copy of SPCC Class 1 9. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (ST.3.1) Class 1 10. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is not integrated into plan-

ning Class 1

11. No or inadequate coordination with the fire department Class 3 12. Inappropriately operating as a hazardous waste CESQG Class 1 13. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW Class 1 14. SPCC plan inadequate Class 1 15. Inadequate ISCP training Class 3 16. Noncompliance with state and local solid waste regulations Class 1 17. Natural resources are not or are inadequately managed to support the

military mission while also protecting and enhancing resources for multiple use, sustainable yield, and biological integrity Class 3

18. Nonparticipation in state/local recycling programs Class 3


19. No or inadequate SPCC training Class 1

20. Inappropriately operating as a hazardous waste SQG Class 3

Trends by Topic and Fiscal Year

In addition to identifying the top 20 findings across all topic areas and across all

FYs for the Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard, the data have been analyzed for the following:

• classification of findings by legislative source (see Appendix D)

• the top three findings in each topic area, across all FYs, for each MACOM

(see Appendices E, F, and G)

• the top three findings in each topic area, in each FY, for the Active Army,

Army Reserve, and Army National Guard (see Appendices H, I, and J).

When there was a tie for placement, the same ranking number was used and all

tied noncompliance findings were listed.

Some of the inconsistencies between commands can be attributed to differences

in activities, but some of it also has to do with different assessors, which is a flaw

in the process as it was executed during these assessments. A prime example of

an inconsistency between assessors has to do with secondary containment for

ASTs over 660 gal. Some assessors reviewing MACOMs view that regulation as

a suggestion, not a requirement. Other assessors view it as a requirement. How

it was viewed determined whether it was written up or not.

Active Army

When looking at the three most common findings in each topic area by FY across

the Active Army, definite trends can be observed, some of which differ from those

appearing in the top 20 list. Unfortunately, in looking at this information it was

found that in virtually every topic area at least one of the top three noncompli-

ance issues identified in the early years of ECAS still shows up in the top three

in the later years.

In the Active Army these trends are as follows (see Appendix G for a tabular rep-

resentation of this data): (Note that these observations are based on data from

FY94 through FY98).


• Air Quality: Not surprisingly, the most consistent trend across all FYs is the

number one finding — noncompliance with state/local regulations. This

category encompasses a broad range of issues though. The most commonly

repeated ones across all FYs are: open lids on solvent degreasers, unpermit-

ted sources (construction and/or operating permits), improper incinerator op-

eration, and particulate emissions. A common finding that dropped off the

top three list in FY97 related to the signs on gasoline pumps. While it would

be nice to think that the Army finally achieved compliance with this re-

quirement, the reality is, this requirement was rescinded. See the individual

state supplement to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state requirements. These

are all Class 1 findings.

• Cultural Resources: In every year's data, the lack of or inadequate historic

properties survey is in the top three findings. In FY96 a management prac-

tice finding (Class 3) on inadequate management/organization of paperwork

made it into the top three. In FY94 through FY96 the lack of or inadequate

Installation Cultural Resources Management Plan (ICRMP) shows up in the

top 3. It disappears in FY97, but it is questionable as to whether it has dis-

appeared because required installations have an ICRMP and all the ICRMP

are adequate, or if the finding is no longer being written because this re-

quirement is interpreted as having a future compliance date. In more recent

years, findings concerning inadequate curation of long-term collections are

increasing. The survey finding and the long-term management of collections

are based on Federal regulations, 36 CFR 60.9; see checklist item CR.5.1. in

U.S. TEAM Guide. The ICRMP finding is based on requirements in AR 200-4

and DoD Instruction (DODI) 4715.3 (see checklist item CR.1.6.Ain the Active

Army Supplement). The survey and collection management are Class 1 find-

ings, and under the revised DOD definitions of Classes, the ICRMP is also a Class 1.

• Hazardous Materials Management: Contrary to expectations, improper

labeling of containers is not an issue that consistently shows up in the top

three, but inadequate management of compressed gas cylinders is an issue,

placing in the top three from FY95 through FY98. Findings written under

the heading "noncompliance with other Federal regulations" also consistently

places in the top 3. These findings were primarily related to PPE and eye-

wash issues. The compressed gas finding is based on Federal regulations, 29

CFR 1910.101; see checklist item HM.45.1 U.S. TEAM Guide. In FY99 and

FY00 a sudden drop off in the numbers of hazardous materials findings was

observed. This drop off is due to the following decision in December 1998:

18 ___ ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Under the ECAS program, only a limited number of OSHA regulations

will be reviewed. In the TEAM Guide, the checklist items with OSHA ci-

tations (Title 29) that will be assessed are found in PM.45.2 (Pesticides).

P0.45 (Service Stations), and SO. 110 (Medical Waste).

OSHA and OSHA-related issues that will not be addressed in the ECAS

program include: eyewashes, fire extinguishers, HAZCOM, MSDSs (i.e.,

in relation to HAZCOM), Chemical Hygiene Plans, and storage of haz-

ardous materials in containers and tanks (i.e., flammable combustible

liquids, storage of acids, storage of compressed gases). These issues are

currently found in TEAM Guide sections HM.1.2 through HM.1.4,

HxM.10, HM.15, HM.35, HM.40, HM.45, ST.120).

Assessors will not add checklist items based on OSHA, NFPA regula-

tions, Compressed Gas Association Standards, ANSI standards, TB-

MEDs, ARs, DODIs or DODRs to the Hazardous Materials section with-

out submitting the citation for review by AEC for inclusion in the TEAM

Guide or Active Army Supplement.

• Hazardous Waste: The number one finding in every FY is inadequate or lack

of waste stream characterizations. This finding addresses orphan drums/

containers and waste streams being disposed of in the solid waste that need

to be disposed of as hazardous waste (e.g., weapons cleaning rags contami-

nated with trichloroethane (TCE)-containing solvent, paper waste from the

floor of paint booths). The other most persistent finding in hazardous waste

(every FY) relates to the management of satellite accumulation points

(SAPs). These findings mostly related to excess quantities of waste at the

SAP. While the Army seems to be succeeding at managing its 90-day storage

areas, there are still problems with moving the waste from the SAPs to the

90-day areas or a TSDF. And shop personnel are not trained. The charac-

terization finding is based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 261.3, 261.4(b),

261.21 through 261.24, and 262.11; see checklist item HW.10.1 in U.S. TEAM

Guide. The SAP findings are based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 262.34(c);

see checklist item HW.35.1 (for SQGs) and HW.75.1 (for LQGs) in the U.S.

TEAM Guide. These findings are all Class 1.

Although the numbers are not high enough to affect these statistics, there is

an increase in FY99 and FY00 findings on the management of universal

waste. This increase is due to the adoption of the universal waste regula-

tions by the states. Until these Federal regulations were adopted by individ-

ual states, they could not be implemented.


Natural Resources: The most persistent finding is the lack of or inadequate Installation Natural Resource Management Plan (INRMP). In 3 of the 5 years of data, this was the number one finding in Natural Resources. The second most common finding (FY95-97) is no (or inadequate) survey of endangered species. The plan finding is based on both Federal and Army requirements, Sikes Act, 42 USC 670 et seq (see checklist item NR.1.2 in U.S. TEAM Guide), and Army/DOD requirements (see checklist item NR.1.3.A in the Active Army supplement to TEAM). The survey finding is based on Fed- eral requirements, 50 CFR 402.01(a), 402.10, and 402.12, see checklist item NR.20.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The survey is a Class 1 finding and, under the revised DOD definitions of Classes, the INRMP is also a Class 1.

Other Environmental Issues - NEPA: This category seems to have a success story during FY94-96, NEPA not being integrated into the planning process was consistently in the top three findings. It does not place in the top three at all in FY97 and FY98. Instead, a management practice (MP) finding of inadequate management and organization of paperwork appears in the top three in FY96 and stays there. So, while the Army seems to be better at in- corporating NEPA into its processes, it is not managing all the ensuing paperwork well.

Other Environmental Issues -Noise: Two of the top three findings have been the same every year FY94-97. They are: no or inadequate ICUZ study and no or inadequate noise-complaint procedure. No noise findings were in the data available for FY98. These findings are based on requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3

Other Environmental Issues - Installation Restoration Program (IRP): The only finding that consistently shows up in the top three in this category first placed in FY95. This is the lack of or inadequate removal site evaluation. No IRP findings were found in the data available for FY98. The evaluation findings are based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 300.410; see checklist item 03.1.2 in U.S. TEAM Guide. Class 1

Other Environmental Issues - Pollution Prevention (P2): Insufficient data.

Other Environmental Issues - Environmental Management: Due to the fluc- tuation in this section in what is being assessed and what has been assessed, it is difficult to track trends. The most persistent findings across all FYs, however, relate to insufficient funding and staffing, which was closely followed by internal communication problems. Class 3

20 . ^^ ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Pesticides Management: The finding that shows up most frequently across

multiple FYs (FY94, FY96 - 98) is no or inadequate Installation Pest Man-

agement Plan (IPMP). That is followed by inadequate pesticide storage and

mixing areas. These findings are driven by requirements in AR 420-76, AR

200-5 (replacement for AR 420-76), and DODI 4150.7. Class 3

POL Management: The problem that shows up at the top of the list most fre-

quently (every FY) in this category is the lack of or inadequate spill contain-

ment and cleanup materials. After the problems with appropriate spill con-

tainment/clean up materials, the lack of or inadequate SPCC made the top

three every FY since FY95. The containment and cleanup materials finding

is based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 110.2, 110.3, 110.5, and 110.6; see

checklist item PO.20.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The SPCC findings are

based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 112.1(d) through 112.7; see checklist

items PO.5.1 through PO.5.6 in U.S. TEAM Guide. Class 1

Solid Waste Management: Not surprisingly, the most consistent trend across

all FYs is noncompliance with state and local regulations. This category en-

compasses a broad range of issues though. The most commonly repeated is-

sues across all FYs are: waste tire storage, landfill management, and medi-

cal waste management. The second most persistent finding has to do with

the improper storage of solid waste or recyclables prior to pick up for dis-

posal. This finding usually translates to overflowing dumpsters, open lids on

dumpsters, and recyclables being disposed of as solid waste. This second

finding is based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR 243.200-1; see checklist

item SO. 10.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. See the individual state supplement

to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state requirements. Class 1

Storage Tanks Management: The most prevalent findings from FY94

through FY97 related to UST upgrading. The success story here is the

Army's success in meeting the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's)

December 1998 deadline. The next most common trend (starting in FY95) is

noncompliance with state/local regulations. This category encompasses a

broad range of state-regulated issues. The most commonly repeated state-

regulated issues across all FYs since FY95 are: tanks (ASTs and USTs) not

being registered; inadequate spill and overfill protection; and inadequate sec-

ondary containment for ASTs. See the individual state supplement to U.S.

TEAM Guide for specific state requirements. Class 1 and 2 (USTs until De-

cember 1999).

Toxic Substances - PCBs: The same three issues make the top three in all

FYs. The first is no or inadequate PCB annual document log; second is the


lack of required markings on PCB equipment; and third is inadequate stor-

age areas for PCB items. No PCB findings were found in the data available

for FY98. The marking finding is based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR

761.40 and 761.45; see checklist item Tl.10.2. in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The

documentation finding is based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR 761.180(a);

see checklist item Tl.15.1 in the U.S. TEAM Guide. The storage finding is

based on a Federal regulation, 40 CFR 761.65(a) through 761.65(b)(1), see

checklist item Tl.40.2 in U.S. TEAM Guide. Class 1

Toxic Substances -Asbestos: The same two issues show up in the top three in

each year for which there is data. These issues are the lack of or inadequate

asbestos survey and the lack of or inadequate Asbestos Management Plan.

No asbestos findings were in the data available for FY97. Both of these find-

ings are driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3

Toxic Substances - Radon: The only persistent finding across FYs, and in the

top three every FY, is the lack of or incomplete radon measurements. No ra-

don findings were found in the data available for FY98. This finding is

driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3

Toxic Substances - LBP: The most common trend in this category is the lack

of or inadequate notification of housing occupants as to the lead-based paint (LBP) hazard in their housing. Class 1

Wastewater: The most consistent trend across all FYs and the number one

finding is noncompliance with state and local regulations. This category en-

compasses a broad range of issues. The most commonly repeated state-

regulated issues across all FYs are: unpermitted discharges and violations of

existing permits. The second most persistent findings, across all FYs, is the

discharge of inappropriate materials/waste to the POTW/FOTW. This dis-

charge finding is based on Federal regulations, 40 CFR 403.5(a) through

403.5(c); see checklist items WA.25.1 and WA.25.3 in the U.S. TEAM Guide.

See the individual state supplement to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state

requirements. Class 1

Water Quality: The most consistent trend across all FYs and the number one


compasses a broad range of state-regulated issues. The most commonly re-

peated state-regulated issues across all FYs are: no cross connection control

program, improper well closure, and inadequate recordkeeping. See the indi-

vidual state supplement to U.S. TEAM Guide for specific state requirements.

Class 1

i? ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Army Reserve

When looking at the three most common findings in each topic area by FY across

the Army Reserve, definite trends can also be observed, some of which differ

from those appearing in the top 20 list. Unfortunately, in looking at this infor-

mation it was found that in virtually every topic area at least one of the top three

noncompliance issues identified in the early years of ECAS still shows up in the

top three in the later years. These are not always the same trends as found in

the Active Army, however, due to the nature and size of Reserve facilities. See

Appendix H for a tabular representation of this data. (Note that these observa-

tions are based on data from FY91 through FY98.)

• Air Quality: Not surprisingly, the most consistent trend across all FYs and

the number one finding is noncompliance with state and local regulations.

This category encompasses a broad range of issues. The most commonly re-

peated ones across all FYs are open lids on solvent degreasers and unpermit-

ted sources (construction and/or operating permits) and improper incinerator

operation. Unlike the Active Army, a persistent finding for the Reserve is the

lack of or inadequate emissions inventory. A finding that has dropped was

the lack of or incomplete quarterly chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) procurement re-

ports. With the revision of AR 200-1, this requirement was removed. The in-

ventory is a Class 3 finding, while noncompliance with state/local regulations is a Class 1 finding.

Cultural Resources: In FY91 through FY96 data, the lack of or inadequate

historic properties survey is in the top three. Additionally findings in every

FY indicate that effects of undertakings on historic properties are not ade-

quately considered. Unlike the Active Army, the ICRMP does not show up as

a persistent issue. Both are Class 1 findings.

Hazardous Materials Management: The top findings trends in this topic area

are completely different than for the Active Army, because the Reserve has a

different perspective on what is and is not to be audited in this topic area.

Findings of noncompliance that occur annually relate to MSDSs, storage of

flammable/combustible liquids, and coordination with the local fire depart-

ment. These findings are all Health and Safety and not Environmental find-

ings.

Hazardous Waste: As with the Active Army, a persistent finding is inade-

quate or lack of waste stream characterization/inventory. This finding ad-

dresses orphan drums/containers; waste streams being disposed of in the

solid waste that need to go as hazardous waste (e.g., weapons cleaning rags


contaminated with TCE-containing solvent, paper waste from the floor of

paint booths). The other persistent finding for the Army Reserve is the lack

of or inadequate hazardous waste management plan. The characterization

finding is based on Federal regulations and is Class 1; the hazardous waste

management plan is Class 3.

• Natural Resources: Unlike the Active Army, the INRMP is not an issue for

the Army Reserve, because it lacks large tracts of land. They do still need to

perform surveys of threatened and endangered species on the property they

do own. Problems also exist with grounds maintenance at Reserve Centers.

This is probably a result of a lack of personnel dedicated to this type of job.

The survey is a Class 1 finding and inadequate grounds maintenance is a

Class 3 finding.

• Other Environmental Issues ■ NEPA: Findings that NEPA is not being inte-

grated into the planning process are consistently in the top three. This is a

Class 3 finding.

• Other Environmental Issues - Noise: Two of the top three findings have been

the same every year during FY91-97. They are: no or inadequate ICUZ

study and no or inadequate noise complaint procedure. This duplicates the

situation for the Active Army. These findings are based on requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3

• Other Environmental Issues - IRP: The only finding that consistently shows

up in the top three in this category is the lack of or inadequate screening for

the past use of hazardous substances. Class 3

• Other Environmental Issues - P2: The lack of or incomplete master listing of

hazardous substances and/or a P2 Plan are the consistent repeats in this category. Class 3

• Other Environmental Issues - Environmental Management: The only consis-

tent theme in this medium is a lack of environmental training as required by

AR 200-1. Class 3

• Pesticides Management: Unlike the Active Army, there are findings in all

FYs for no or inadequate review of pesticide contracts and pesticide applica-

tors not being DOD-certified. These both are occurring because the usual

practice for a Reserve Center is to contract out pest control operations or to

have a soldier do it who has never been certified. Class 3

24 ERDCCERLTR-01-34

POL Management: The consistent theme in this category is a lack of or in-

adequate plans related to the management of POL (e.g., PSCC Plans. ISCP,

and/or plans for reclaimed, recoverable, and waste liquid petroleum). The

last plan is no longer required with the re-write of AR 200-1. The SPCC is a

Class 1 finding while the ISCP is a Class 2 finding.

Solid Waste Management: The most consistent trend across all FYs is non-

participation in available recycling programs. Army personnel are not re-

quired to recycle, but are encouraged to do so. Class 3

Storage Tanks Management: The most prevalent findings from FY91 - 97

related to UST upgrading. After the UST issue, the next most common trend

(starting in FY95) is inadequate secondary containment for ASTs. Class 1

and 2 (USTs until December 1999).

Toxic Substances - PCBs: The only repetitive finding is the lack of required

markings on PCB equipment. This finding stems, in part, from transformers

located on Reserve property that are not clearly marked as to whether they

belong to the local utility company or the Army Reserve. Class 1

Toxic Substances -Asbestos: The same two issues show up in the top three in

each year for which there is data. These issues are the lack of or inadequate

asbestos survey and the lack of or inadequate Asbestos Management Plan.

Both of these findings are driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3

Toxic Substances - Radon: The only persistent finding across FYs, and in the

top three in every FY, is the lack of or incomplete radon measurements. This

finding is driven by requirements in AR 200-1. Class 3

Wastewater: The most consistent trend across all FYs related to the surveil-

lance of stormwater discharge. This is not a regulatory requirement, but a

management practice. The second most persistent finding, across all FYs, is

the discharge of inappropriate materials/waste to the POTW/FOTW. Class 1

Water Quality: The most consistent trend across all FYs and the number one


compasses a broad range of state-regulated issues. The most commonly re-

peated state-regulated issues across all FYs are improper well closure and

inadequate recordkeeping. Class 1


Army National Guard

When looking at the three most common findings in each topic area by FY across the Army National Guard, it is difficult to identify trends because there are only 2 years worth of data. See Appendix I for a tabular representation of this data.

Trends Across Topics

Program management issues such as training, recordkeeping, plans, permits, labeling, and reporting are not confined to a single topic area, but cross all topics. These program management issues account for 40 percent of all the findings:

Reporting Requirements = 1 percent Permits = 5 percent Training = 5 percent Labeling = 5 percent Program Management* = 7 percent Plans = 8 percent Recordkeeping = 8 percent

*Program Management encompasses staffing, budget, communications, policies, and procedures.

Numeric Analysis of Findings

Numbers of Findings

To define the validity of numeric analysis, it is important to understand the baseline. As represented in Table 1, data received from the Army Reserve date back further than any other data. But the Army Reserve had a more difficult time supplying current data. Table 1 represents the number of records in the database, by FY, for the Active Army, Army Reserve, and the Army National Guard. Additional data for FY98 and a portion of FY99 were not received until July 2000 and had not been comprehensively analyzed at the time of this report.


Table 1. Number of database records by organization and FY.

FY Active Army Army Reserve Army National

Guard TOTAL Oct 1990-Sept 1991

(FY91) No data 58 No data 58

Oct 1991 -Sept 1992

(FY92)

No data 980 No data 980

Oct 1992-Sept 1993

(FY93)

No data 1974 No data 1974

Oct 1993-Sept 1994

(FY94)

2195 922 No data 3117

Oct 1994-Sept 1995

(FY95)

2669 37 No data 2706

Oct 1995-Sept 1996

(FY96)

1994 822 No data 2816

Oct 1996-Sept 1997

(FY97) 949 662 1541 3152

Oct 1997-Sept 1998

(FY98) 65 182 386 633

Oct 1998-Sept 1999

(FY99) 1180 No data No data 1180

Oct 1999-Sept 2000

(FY00) 439 No data No data 439

Positive Findings

A Positive finding is defined as one that documents an instance of going above and beyond compliance with the regulations, not just simple compliance. While reviewing the data it became clear that this definition was not always adhered to. Therefore, findings that were originally classed as Positive (898) that did not meet the definition for positive findings were reclassified as False Positives (399). This 49 percent reflects the desire of the auditor to give individuals a "pat on the back" for doing a difficult job well. There was no indication, however, of anything done that was unique or innovative. Instead of being documented as positive findings, these kinds of kudos are best conveyed verbally in the outbrief when commanding officers are present. See Appendices K, L, M, N, and O for specific details.


Accuracy of Findings

Findings were classed as questionable for the following reasons:

Ql - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under regulations re-

lating to more than one size of hazardous waste generator. The text of the find-

ing does not document actual generator status.

Q2 - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under regulations re-

lating to both hazardous waste generators and TSDFs. The text of the finding

does not document actual generator status or TSDF status.

Q3 - The regulation cited is not relevant for the description provided in the text of this finding.

Q4 - The positive finding does not indicate the installation/facility has gone

above and beyond regulatory requirements or that they have shown extraordi-

nary initiative and innovation.

Q5 - The finding combines Class 1 and Class 3 regulatory requirements into one finding.

In reviewing the data (see Appendix P for numeric details) it is obvious that the

Army National Guard has virtually no questionable findings, an average of

1.5/yr for the 2 yr of data received; whereas the Active Army averaged 130 ques-

tionable findings per year for the 4 yr of complete data received and the Army

Reserve averaged 82 questionable findings per year. It can be concluded that the

Army National Guard has a superior quality assurance program to ensure that

the findings generated under ECAS are accurate.

For the Active Army, the primary reason for being questionable was a disconnect

between the description of the noncompliance situation and the cited regulation.

The most prevalent reason for the Army Reserve, however, is positive findings

that do not indicate going above and beyond. In talking to members of the Re-

serve about this issue, it was noted that some Reserve audit teams feel they al-

ways have to leave a facility with at least one positive finding, even if it is for

something like good landscaping.

Citations of Negative Findings

Findings are written up against one of three types of citations: (1) a manage-

ment practice finding based on a suggested good idea, (2) an AR/DOD finding

2§ . ______ ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

based on requirements found in Army Regulations, DOD Instructions, and/or

DOD Directives, and (3) a regulatory finding based on a state/local/Federal re-

quirement. As is to be expected, more regulatory findings were written than

management practices or AR/DOD. See Appendix Q.

Pollution Prevention Solutions

Rather than identifying pollution prevention (P2) solutions for all potential

compliance findings, the top 20 noncompliance findings for the Active Army were

analyzed for potential P2 solutions. Correcting most of the following findings

involves process change and/or proper training for applicable personnel instead

of a technological solution. However, the following programs might also facili-

tate compliance through "P2 glasses" across topic areas.

1. Diversifying the P2 Program: The P2 mission is to reduce or eliminate pollution

of land, air, and water resources. An individual can make an impact while im-

plementing a P2 program; however, one person rarely has enough knowledge or

expertise to understand everything related to P2. Forming a team of experts

from natural resources, energy conservation, compliance, and other environ-

mental areas can lead to better decisions, initiatives, and solutions by drawing on

the skills, knowledge, and experience of many disciplines.

2. Forming an internal PPOA Site Assessment Team: These "internal" site assess-

ments involve no regulators, are of short duration, and focus on solving mainte-

nance and environmental challenges. Solutions are sought that both protect the

environment and reduce workload and/or cost to the customer. Emphasis is

placed on finding, developing, and implementing only those material substitu-

tions, work process changes, and technology acquisitions that will not increase the burden of the producer.

No or Inadequate Characterization of Wastes (HW. 10.1)

P2 solutions: Not knowing the characterization of waste is a potential source of

pollution due to improper disposal and/or storage. Technologies/processes that can assist:

• Develop a waste analysis plan that serves to standardize and optimize the

required testing of wastes so that all wastes at a site are properly character-

ized prior to disposal in a simple and efficient manner. A waste analysis plan

establishes the characterization frequency and analytical requirements to be

satisfied for every identified waste at the installation and provides guidance


for handling new wastes. Components of the plan include: Responsibilities

for Characterization Prior to Disposal, Characterization by Generator

Knowledge of a Listed Hazardous Waste, and Determining the Frequency of

Characterization.

• HazMat Pharmacy Implementation: This approach includes a centralized

system responsible for control of hazardous material inventories from requi-

sition to disposal. The Pharmacy manages authorization, procurement, re-

ceipt, storage, issue, use, reuse/recycling, and eventual disposal. Knowing

what is on hand and procuring it will eliminate having inadequate charac-

terization of waste.

• Computerized tracking systems that may enhance or even be required by a

HazMat Pharmacy system. Tracking facilitates compliance with reporting

requirements and the data can provide accurate accounting for emergency

planning and community right-to-know (EPCRA) reporting as well as a his-

toric record of reductions in the use of specific hazardous materials. The

tracking begins when a material is ordered and follows the material and its

container through receipt, issue, use, return, reissue, recycling, and disposal.

Noncompliance With State and Local Wastewater Regulations (WA.3.1)

P2 solutions: There are no easy technological fixes; most of the findings can be

corrected through process change and/or training. However, a few storm water

and wastewater technologies may be enhancements:

• Sand filter for treating storm water runoff: Sand filters can be used for

storm water quality control and managing storm water runoffvolum.es. Sand

filters are composed of at least two components: a sedimentation chamber

and a filtration chamber. The sedimentation chamber removes floatables

and heavy sediments, while the filtration chamber removes additional pol-

lutants by filtering flow through a sand bed.

• Water quality inlets (WQIs) to control storm water runoff: WQIs are struc-

tures designed to separate pollutants from the first flush of storm water us-

ing a series of chambers for pollutant sedimentation, screening, and separa-

tion. A water quality inlet typically consists of a sedimentation chamber, an

oil separation chamber, and a discharge chamber. Because of their separa-

tion capabilities, WQIs are occasionally referred to as oil/grit separators or

oil/water separators. These best management practices (BMPs) may be con-

structed on site, precast, or manufactured by a vendor.


•

Wet detention ponds to treat storm water runoff: A wet detention pond is a

constructed pond that maintains a permanent pool of water within a desig-

nated area, a I relies on physical biological, and chemical processes to re-

move pollutants from storm water runoff. Pollutants removed include sedi-

ment, organic matter, dissolved metals, and nutrients. In addition, wet

detention ponds control storm water flow that prevents downstream flooding.

As storm water enters the pond, treated water is displaced and discharged into a receiving body of water.

Secondary use of acids and alkalis for wastewater treatment: The secondary

use of acids and alkalis as treatment chemicals in an Industrial Wastewater

Treatment Plant (IWTP) is a feasible waste reduction method, effectively re-

ducing the disposal of used or excess acids and alkalis. The secondary use of

acids and alkalis can reduce problems associated with disposal of acid and

alkali waste streams, such as the high cost and the liability of normal waste disposal.

Hydroblasting wastewater recycling system: This technology has been used

to successfully recycle wastewater generated during the hydroblasting of

ships' boilers. Hydroblasting is a time-consuming process that generates

12,000 to 20,000 gallons of wastewater containing heavy metals and sodium

nitrate. Sodium nitrate is added to the water used in the hydroblasting proc-

ess and acts as a surface conditioner that prevents flash rusting of boiler tube

surfaces during hydroblasting operations. It has been found that this wa-

ter/sodium nitrate mixture can be reused in the hydroblasting process with-

out adversely affecting the finished product only if the solids have been removed.

Laser reduction of toxic organic compounds in wastewater: Laser-Induced

Photochemical Oxidative Destruction (LIPOD) is a method to photochemi-

cally oxidize organic compounds in wastewater. Using a laser, ultraviolet ra-

diation can be applied to organic compounds to achieve complete oxidation of a variety of organic compounds.

Reverse osmosis (RO) and ultrafiltration wastewater treatment process: RO

technology uses membrane separation systems typically to remove inorganic

salts from wastewater. However, RO can also be used to treat wastewater

containing some organic solvents. The RO system uses a semipermeable

membrane to separate pure water from contaminated liquids.

Evaporator for aqueous waste reduction: Evaporation is a proven technology

for reducing aqueous wastes. By using active evaporation or heating to


evaporate excess water, hazardous waste rinse water disposal or wastewater treatment can be minimized.

• Biological aqueous wastewater treatment system: The BioTrol Aqueous

Treatment System (BATS) is a biological treatment system for contaminated

wastewater. This system uses naturally occurring microbes; however, where

highly toxic or recalcitrant target compounds are present, microbial amend-

ments are introduced.

• Precipitation and microfiltration wastewater treatment systems: The pre-

cipitation and microfiltration process uses a combination of treatments on a

variety of wastes. Chemical precipitation of heavy metals is the first treat-

ment in this process. Precipitates and all particles larger than 0.1 to 0.2 mi-

cron size are filtered through a unique tubular fabric crossflow microfilter.

Concentrate is dewatered using conventional processes, such as filter press or centrifuge.

• Powdered activated carbon wastewater treatment: The technology removes

organic contaminants from wastewater and minimizes the inhibitory effects

of process wastewater containing toxic organic compounds.

Noncompliance With State and Local Air Emissions Regulations (AE.3.1)

P2 solution: Process changes and/or training would correct most of the find-

ings. In respect to emissions from open burning/open detonation (OB/OD), the

BangBox testing chambers, emissions characterization of complete munitions,

and grouping munitions into emissions families so that future testing require-

ments can be abbreviated might prove to be viable P2 solutions to OB/OD emis-

sions. A draft report of the first subsurface BangBox test was completed in May 1997.

Noncompliance With State and Local Drinking Water/Water Quality Regulations (WQ.3.1)

P2 solution: All findings can be addressed by process change and/or training

programs. Following proper operations and maintenance (O&M) procedures and

scheduling guidelines would address any equipment failures.

3? ERDCCERLTR-01-34

Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Hazardous Materials (OSHA-based regulations pertaining to issues such as personal protection equipment [PPE] and eyewashes) (HM.2.1)

P2 solution: There is no P2 solution for these findings. It is a matter of keep-

ing abreast of a dynamic environmental regulatory environment.

Noncompliance With State and Local Solid Waste Regulations (SO.3.1)

P2 solution: Most findings can be addressed by process change and/or training

programs. Actual technologies/procedures that may assist in achieving compli-

ance and minimizing or prohibiting potential pollution follow:

• Recycling Sorting Line (RSL): An RSL, also known as a clean material recov-

ery facility (MRF) processes commingled recyclables from curbside collection

programs, drop-off sites, or satellite recycling centers. A properly designed

RSL will process and recover up to 90 percent of the collected material. Re-

covered material is ultimately re-sold to specialty recyclers. Materials proc-

essed include newspaper; steel and aluminum cans; brown, green, and clear

glass; polyethylene terephthalate (PET); and high-density polyethylene

(HDPE) plastics. An RSL serving a small community is typically designed to

process less than 50 tons/day of recyclables. An RSL serving a municipality

can process 200 to 300 tons/day of recyclables. A sorting line may keep poten-

tial HW or medical wastes from being landfilled.

Solid waste sorting line (SWSL): An SWSL, also known as a dirty MRF,

processes recyclables from a stream of raw solid waste and is typically used

in rural areas with no curbside programs or in communities that are not ac-

tively promoting recycling. A properly designed SWSL will process and re-

cover between 5 and 45 percent of the incoming material as recyclables; the

remainder is used in a waste-to-energy facility, landfilled, or otherwise dis-

posed of.

Use of collection containers for recycling: Using individual, dedicated (com-

partmentalized) recycling containers to separate common recyclables such as

plastics, glass, paper, cans, and compostables from both residential and

commercial waste streams eliminates or reduces the need to sort the materi-

als at the recycling center and results in lower processing costs. The contain-

ers may be placed at exterior or interior locations around the residential or

work areas, allowing the residents or personnel to place each type of material

in its own bin.


Hazardous Waste Satellite Accumulation Point/Accumulation Point Limits Exceeded (HW. 75.1)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training. In addition, ensuring that the contractor (if picked up by a contractor) provides an adequate pick-up schedule based on usage.

Discharge of Oil Into or Upon Navigable Waters (PO. 15.1)

P2 solution: Ensure that spill and response plans are up-to-date and personnel are properly trained in procedures to follow in the event of an accidental discharge.

Inadequate or No Spill Containment and Cleanup Materials in POL Storage Areas (PO.20.1)

P2 solution: Can be solved by process changes and/or training.

Noncompliance With State and Local Hazardous Waste Regulations (HW.3.1)

P2 solution: The findings here can all be addressed by process change and/or training programs and following prescribed O&M schedules for all equipment.

Noncompliance With Other Federal Regulations Regarding Water Quality (WQ.2.1)

P2 solution: Process changes and/or adequate training to ensure compliance with Federal regulations.

Noncompliance With State and Local Storage Tank Regulations (ST.3.1)

P2 solution: Process changes and/or adequate training to ensure up-tordate recordkeeping and procedures are followed.

Noncompliance With or Lack of State/Federal NPDES for Point Source Discharges (WA. 10.1)

P2 solution: Process changes and/or adequate training.


Discharges That Would Cause Pass Through or Interference at the POTW/ FOTW (WA.25.1)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training - following proper O&M procedures/schedules.

Improper Storage of Compressed Gas Cylinders (HM.45.1)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training - find out how and store the compressed cylinders correctly and safely.

Lack of "Used Oil" Label on ASTs (ST. 125.1)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training.

Lack of or Incomplete MSDSs (HM. 1.2)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training. Of course, procuring the correct and complete MSDS would correct the problem.

Inadequate Management and Organization of Paperwork (05.1.2.A)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training for personnel.

Inadequate Fire Protection for Flammable/Combustible Storage Areas (HM.35.9)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training. In this case, find out guidelines for fire protection and procure the proper equipment.

No or Incomplete Asbestos Survey (T2.1.3.A)

P2 solution: Process change and/or training. Either do the survey or finish it properly.

ERDC/CERL TR-01-34 35

03 C <

iS 03 Q 0

■ HM <D c O

■o TJ

0 CÖ

■D £ +J

3 Ö MM

03 o c CO

CO to CO

(0 CD

0 PC

■ HHI 4H* r-C ■ HM ■■ X ■ HM

ü £

03 _fi

U. F fc </> c 4J

T3 o Ö ■ ■■1 wf/mJ T3

03 cö ■Hl s Hl

03 s +•* o

<n o c o ■■■ c?

§ >>

PQ

< T3 CD

X ö ■ HHI cö "D s-i

C o

o •pH

Q. CO

Q. CO

< EH

o 3|

pC 0) >> s

3

s a, CO o m

13 <

*-< <

'o 1 '2

s

3 s ca

P3 i i kl es fti n ;>> « X!

(XI C0 £ 6 cö o < 1-4 Q 1—( s < eu H

CO

Q

c kl

>> 6

'S o

4J o a

SH o 0) «! E-i «

cö -u cö

XI o

k,

3 o

a c <

o a a> P

kl <1>

i

s ü <

p—i O

o o CO

CO cö

m S rl >> m TJ £ s-i

< C0

>> 3 cö e 1—H

fl P3

cö o tj-4

CL, ■e >^ 3 o s

o

CO 0)

s 3 < r< < DH

CÖ

3 CO CO kl

<

< o 3

Cü 3

o >, -U

CO S Ö cö

Q < P* >> cö p«

id s r3

c ^

cö EH

s kl < kl

> s

CU

3 CÖ

o a CO

Q

cö 3 CO co SH

<

05

2

CO

£ £

I-» 05

a

o> 01 SH be

«0

o a O

Ö o c Cd SH CJ

CO

>> £ SH

<; 03 SH SH

co

-u o a a> Q

o

C

CO

ca c c « >> o

o ft Q >> £ s- <

ca O >> £ SH

< CO

S3 riso

n - S

elfr

id

•

Wh

ite

San

ds

0) M C ca

Pi eu

'in tn

s

-u 1

>> o to be C £

c

>> ft 0> -a

«5

2 < Q r5 >>

> o s-1 en

PH T3 r* C -u C3

o a a) o o

o a. a>

CO

£ '■5 O

Cd

C3 13 3 s- CO O H Q t) <C c >H Ü

>> >> £ +J %

CO

£ Si

£ «Si

SH c cS

03 0>

C3

05 SH PH +3

f* o -u <2 r! O X c

o k Ö 0)

o PH cB

SH •a C

c ■f—1

-t-> c

•PH ca

CO U CO w H > CO

• • • •

hn bn o o cd SH

m -t-i fa

•

CD

J

fa

•

0) ^3 ft bn

05 s cB u fa

•

CO

s • 1—1

M CO

•

S '3 '3 •- EH

SH CD

c CD

Ü

00 03

CO

O

55

C fi fi o o CO

SH

fa CO

CS

H fa

I—«

bo bo cB SH

pa

s CO

r—1 r—H

'6

Ö ca

'S Ö

t-H

CO

-fi fa

CJ

ft£ ^s 0) cB +J cB _,j o W fa fa fa fa O fa

• • • • •

£> 1

fi +J Fi CB

?P s e CO CO

CD

co +» fa

3 E-H CD

£ £ 3 SH

Q

fa fa

CD

fa

fi l-H 1»

SH

3 Yak

ima

ing

Cen

•

c o

Ö ■*->

«5

£ o co '- cB O • 1-4

P s CS

T3 O O

a fa S3 +J -t-> +J -u -*-> -u fa fa fa fa fa fa

fi rl !# o o CO

-4-> SH

o <* £

c cB

'•& fi

t—4 ft

CD

,fi fa

02 -t-J fa o fa

o fa

• •

d OS T!

CD

£ fa <

O CD

O 0)

CB

CD >>

+J +J CD +-> fa fa fa

• • •

CO £ CO

£ CO

o

•

t^ £ cB

£ -i-5 CO

O

55

•

CD +J

d CO

4) CD CD O co bjo •i—< "fi o £ SH

o CD

O CD

CB

Xl O

OH S» -l->

CD +j +J c3

fa fa fa fa

• • •

1

e CD r) SH

£ fi o

_C (—H

SH

< •

Iß fi o

'+3 cB

55 CD

• F

t. B

elvo

i

• F

t. M

yer

•<* £ cd

£ CB

T3 9m O

£ 55

•

© c o © T; ^ >- J. _j

I* ^ ,2 fa £

•

05 03 -u>

£ O 2

•

X CS

2 C3

C X) &U| O

2

•

t> CO 05 -l-J

£ T> O 2

•

TJ CD 0)

«0 tf 05 S-

e £ 3 •

^ u 10 i* 05 CD

£ Q •+J fa

•

■* ca

05 CS

^ T)

ft o 2

• •

© 02 © ^-.

£ fa

•

c CD en O

05 en 3

fa

TJ X S-, n fr

£ £

o Ü

o o «5

o

CO -U ■+-> -M -1-3 +J -*^> fa fa fa fa fa fa

fi o en

a r*

05 o

£ •"3

fa

•

e O

05 u O a fa

•

X o

fa

•

c CS

CD CD Cw

«0 CS

a>

Ü

O

fi Tl O CD

• Ü S-, 05 ,a o o u i—1 T) CD

£ o § s o w .-5 -w co ö CD o

-4J 4-> -U 4J +J fa S fa fa fa fa fa

CS

bo fi

"S C CD

«

co CO

s

u 3

^3 a CS

3 K

fi o CO

u CS

S-< CS

c o CD

od

Ru

cer

05 -U -*j -u +J ■+J

^ fa fa fa fa fa fa

£ •

C O • •

05

X)

o CD (1) o e O

fa -t->

fa

H • • •

s 02

c o be

3 c (X!

3 ÖS

- 03

CD

4S 01

ID CD '53

o "3

6 03 CO

CD

CD

Q CO o 03

+-> +J -*-> +J o <! ^ fa fa fa fa fa OH

a CD s» < a

>>

CD «3 O

u cs

u CO

■~

03 CO CQ

< C

CD o CD

"03 T3 "03

ft Tl CD «Ö SH

CD £ <!

03

O

03 T3 o

55

c o en

I £ OH Ü

be ■c

a '03

fa fa fa

03

o 55

03

O

55

05

•

U

.S.

Arm

y M

ili-

tary

Aca

dem

y

00 03

a

o 55

•

03

03 -a o

55

•

CO

•

U.S

. Arm

y M

ili-

tary

Aca

dem

y

1ft 03

H-> 03

TJ O

55

•

03 +J 03

TJ O

55

•

IH CD

s c

fa fa

>

0) c o

TJ CO CO

& CO C

_0 +3 ja 13 +» CO fi

I^-H

CO <u

'S

ho C

•I-H

Ö

o Ü


Appendix B: Definitions for Fields in ACCESS Database

• FFID - Federal Facility ID Number • NAME - Name of the facility/installation assessed • MACOM - Name of Major Army Command the facility/installation belongs to.

Options in this field include:

AMC TRADOC

FORSCOMM USARC

MEDCOM USARPAC

MDW USMA

MUSARC - used for Reserve facilities for additional identification CITY - location for facility/installation assessed STATE - location for the facility/installation assessed COUNTRY - country of the facility/installation assessed FISCAL YEAR - FY the assessment was conducted ASSESSMENT DATE - dates the assessment occurred FINDING ID - number used as a unique record identifier LAW/REG - identifies the law/statute that is the authority for the noncompliance finding. Options in this field include:

Code: Definition:

CAA Clean Air Act

CURL Cultural Resources

CWA Clean Water Act

ESA Endangered Species Act


EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act

FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act

MULT Multiple

NATR Natural Resources

NCA Noise Control Act

NEPA National Environmental Protection Act

NHPA National Historic Preservation Act

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act

PRVN Pollution Prevention

RCRA-C Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subpart C

RCRA-D Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subpart D

RCRA-I Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Subpart I

SD WA Safe Drinking Water Act

SFND Superfund

TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act

• MANUAL SECTION - identifies which section of the TEAM Guide or associ-

ated Supplement the finding was written under.

Manual Section: Question Number Prefix:

Air Emissions AE

Cultural Resources CR

Hazardous Materials HM

__! . ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Hazardous Waste HW

Natural Resources NR

Other Env. Issues, NEPA 01

Other Env Issues, Noise 02

Other Env. Issues, IRP 03

Other Env. Issues, P2 04

Other Env Issues, Program Mgt. 05

Pesticides PM

POL Management PO

Solid Waste SO

Storage Tanks ST

Toxic Substances, PCB Tl

Toxic Substances, Asbestos T2

Toxic Substances, Radon T3

Toxic Substances, LBP T4

Wastewater WA

Water Quality WQ

• QUESTION NUMBER - The checklist item number from U.S. TEAM Guide

and/or its affiliated Supplements.

• QUESTIONABLE FINDING - Indicates that this finding is questionable.

The reason it is questionable is listed in the REASON FOR

QUESTIONABLE field.


• REASON FOR QUESTIONABLE - Indicates why the finding is questionable. These reason are as follows:

Ql - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under

regulations relating to more than one size of hazardous waste gen-

erator. The text of the finding does not document actual generator status

Q2 - Findings for a specific installation/facility are written under

regulations relating to both hazardous waste generator and

TSDFs. The text of the finding does not document actual genera-

tor status or TSDF status.

Q3 - The regulation cited is not relevant for the description provided in the text of this finding.

Q4 - The positive finding does not indicate the installation/facility

has gone above and beyond regulatory requirements or that they

have shown extraordinary initiative and innovation.

Q5 - The finding combines Class 1/HS and Class 3 regulatory requirements into one finding.

• POSITIVE/NEGATIVE - indicates whether the finding was positive, negative, or a false positive.

• CLASS - indicates whether the finding is Class 01, 02, 03, HS. For the pur-

poses of this database Class 1 is any finding based on a Federal, state, or lo-

cal regulations. Class 2 findings are those that have a compliance date after

the date of the assessment. Classes 3 are based on Agency/DOD require-

ments and/or management practices. Class HS is based on a health and

safety requirement that is not fundable with environmental funds.

• CORRECTED - when entered, indicates when the noncompliance was cor-

rected. This field being empty is not a definite indicator that noncompliance has not been corrected.

• REPEAT - indicates if the finding is a repeat of a finding in a previous assessment.

• COST - estimated cost to attain compliance.

• TENANT NAME - used when a tenant is assessed at a larger facility

• LOCATION - where the noncompliance is occurring.

• FINDING SUMMARY - short summary of what was wrong

if ERDCCERLTR-01-34

• ROOTCODE - root cause codes. Options for this field include:

Materials:

Ml - Supply

M2 - Poor Quality

Personnel:

PI -Awareness of Requirement

P2 - Understanding

P3 - Not Conscientious (deals with attitude of personnel)

P4 - Result v. Action (The result did not equal the action taken.

Procedures were followed that should have produced a favorable

result but did not.)

P5 - Accountability Not Assigned

P6 - Action v. Procedure (correct procedure(s) in place but incorrect

action taken)

P7 - Insufficient Skills

P8 - Inexperience (not an attitude of personnel)

Equipment:

El - Controls Failure

E2 - Inadequate Facility Design

E3 - Monitoring Equipment Failure

E4 - Poor Maintenance


Techniques:

Tl - Time to Do the Job

T2 - No Procedures in Place

T3 - Priority Conflict

T4 - Inadequate Procedures

T5 - Procedures Not Available

• CRITERIA - text of the requirement, including regulatory citation, from the

TEAM Guide or affiliated supplements.

• FINDING DESCRIPTION - the details of noncompliance.

• SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS - assessor provided guidance on how to attain compliance.

• CORRECTP7E ACTION - actions taken toward compliance.

• FINDING COMMENT - additional comments

• CORRECTIVE ACTION COMMENT - additional comments on corrective actions.

• BRANCH - indicates which branch of the service the data came from. AA - Active Army

USARC -Army Reserves

ARNG -Army National Guard

• KEY WORD INDEX - index terms to allow for a narrower search of the data.


Appendix C: Keyword Index

Aboveground Storage Tank - use AST Accumulation Point Aerosol Cans Air Pollution Control Device Air Quality Antifreeze AR/DOD - used to identify findings based on an AR, DODI, or DODD citation. Archeological Resources Asbestos AST (aboveground storage tank) Automobile Air Conditioning - use MVAC Backflow Prevention Device Ballasts BASH - Bird Air Strike Hazard Program Batteries - term is used for all types of batteries Berm - use SECONDARY CONTAINMENT Biennial Report - use REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Biomonitoring - used for Whole Effluent Toxicity testing of WWTP effluent Blast Facility Boilers Brakes Budget Process Building - use of an unsuitable building Capacitor Cathodic Protection Cemetery CVWF - Central Vehicle Wash Facility Central washrack - see CVWF CFC Chlorination Facility Chemical Analysis Cleanup Closure


Coastal Zone

Coliform

Communication Equipment

Community Relations

Community Right To Know - use EPCRA

Community Water System - use POTABLE WATER SYSTEM

Compaction - i.e., landfill operation

Complaint Investigation System

Compliance Agreement

Compost

Composting Toilet

Compressed Gas

Construction Activity (re NPDES stormwater permits)

Construction/Demolition Waste

Consultation

Container - condition of waste storage container

Container Management

Contaminated Dry Sweep - use SPILL RESPONSE MATERIALS Contaminated Soil

Contract

Cooling Water

Cross Connection Program - use CROSS-CONNECTION Cross-Connection

Cultural Resources

Curation Facilities

CX - Categorical Exclusion

Cylinders - if appropriate, use COMPRESSED GAS instead

Decontamination Facilities

Degreaser - equipment, not cleaning compounds

Demolition

Design Criteria - a structural or equipment requirement

Dike - use SECONDARY CONTAINMENT

Dilution

Dining Facilities

Disinfection

Discharge - the deliberate release of a substance into the air, water, or soil.

Disposal


Documentation - if the issue is "required records are not kept onsite," use "Record-

keeping"; if the issue is "required information of some form is not submitted to a

required person/agency" use "Reporting Requirements"

Dredging

Drinking Water - use Potable Water System

Drip Pan - use Secondary Containment

Drums

Drycleaning

Dumpsite

Dumpster - "dumpster" or other solid waste storage container

Dust Control

EA - Environmental Assessment as related to NEPA

Earthen Dike - use SECONDARY CONTAINMENT

EIS - Environmental Impact Statement

Electric Arc Furnace

Emergency Planning - use for "Contingency Plan"

Emergency Planning Commission - use EMERGENCY PLANNING

Emergency Response Equipment

Emergency Response Team

Emission Controls

Emission Sources

Endangered/Protected Species

Environmental Justice

Environmental Noise

EPCRA

EQCC

Erosion

Exception Report - use REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

Excess Materials

Exercise Plan

Facility Response Plan

Fence - use Security

Filling Station - use FUEL DISPENSING FACILITY

Filters

Filtration

Fire Control

Firing Range

Fish and wildlife - See Wildlife Management

Flammable Storage


Flammable Storage Cabinet - use FLAMMABLE STORAGE Flammable Storage Container - use FLAMMABLE STORAGE Flocculation Floodplain Fluorescent Lightbulbs Fluoridation Followup Inspection - use INSPECTION Food Waste Forestry FOTW - use TREATMENT WORKS Freon - use CFC Fuel - used instead of MOGAS or Gasoline Fuel Dispensing Facility - used for fuel dispensing of any kind, MOGAS, diesel, or

aircraft fuel (i.e., gas stations, service stations, etc.) Fuel Dispensing - refers to vehicle refueling from tankers, fueling operations, fueling

areas, etc. Fuel Filter Fugitive Dust - use FUGITIVE EMISSIONS Fugitive Emissions Fugitive Particulate Emissions - use FUGITIVE EMISSIONS Gasoline - use FUEL Generator - use only for power generators - not generators of hazardous waste Grease Grease Interceptor - use GREASE TRAP Crease Trap Ground Water Habitat Management Halon Hazardous Air Polluant Hazardous Materials Storage Hazardous Waste Storage HAZCOM HAZWOPER - use Training Heating Oil Tank Historic Preservation Household Hazardous Waste Housekeeping Ice ICUZ - Installation Compatible Use Zone

Ü9. . ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

Illegal Dumping

Incinerator

Incinerator Ash

Incompatibles

Indoor Air Quality

Industrial Waste Treatment Plant - use TREATMENT WORKS

Industrial Wastewater

Infectious Waste

I&I - inflow & infiltration

Inspection

Installation Compatible Use Zone - Use ICUZ

Installation On-scene Coordinator (IOSC)

Installation Response Team - use SPILL RESPONSE TEAM

Installation Restoration Program

Interstitial Monitoring Equipment

Inventory

IOSC - installation on-scene coordinator

IRP - use CLEANUP

ISCP - Installation Spill Contingency Plan (an AR/DOD requirement) ITAM

Labeling

Laboratory

Land Application

Land Management

Landfill

Landfill Closure

Landfill Cover

Landfill Gas

Landscape

LBP - use LEAD-BASED PAINT

Leachate

Leach Field - if referring to domestic sewage - see SEPTIC SYSTEM

Lead-Based Paint

Leak - use RELEASE

Leak Detection

Liquid Petroleum Products - use POL

Litter

Loading Area - referring to loading/unloading facilities, areas, or operations for rail-

road cars, coal piles, tank trucks, etc.


Log - use RECORDKEEPING

Maintenance

Management - organizational or management deficiency

Management Practice

Manifests

Maximum Contaminant Levels

Medical Monitoring

Medical Waste

Mess Hall - use DINING FACILITIES

Minimization

Mitigation Measure

Mixed Waste - i.e., radioactive and hazardous waste

Mobile Tanks

Modification

MOGAS-use FUEL

Monitoring

Monitoring Wells

MSDS

Munitions - improper storage or handling of munitions and related products or resi- due

MVAC

National Register

Native American

NEPA

Neutralization

Nickel-Cadmium Batteries - use BATTERIES

Noncommunity Water System - use POTABLE WATER SYSTEM

Notification - use REPORTING REQUIREMENTS

NOV - Notice of violation

NOx

NPDES

NPL (National Priorities List)

OB/OD

Occupational Health Assessment Program

Odor

Off Road Vehicle

Oil

OÜ Dry - use SPILL RESPONSE MATERIALS

Oil Filter


Oil Sheen Oil Soaked Rag - use OILY RAGS Oil-based Paint Oil/Water Separator Oily Rags Opacity Open Burn Pit - use OPEN BURNING Open Burning (for trash) Open Detonation - use OB/OD Open Dump Operation & Maintenance - use O&M Operations Manual Operator Ordnance Overfill Prevention Oxygen Cylinder - use COMPRESSED GAS Ozone Depleting Chemicals P2 Opportunity Paint Booth Particulates Parts Washer - use DEGREASER PCBs Permit Pesticide Applications Pesticide Applicators Pesticide Mixing Area Pesticides Photo Lab Pinkwater Plans Point Source Discharge POL - petroleum, oils, and lubricants POL storage POL Transfer Facility Potable Water Storage Tank Potable Water Well Potable Water Treatment POTW - use TREATMENT WORKS PPE


Procurement

Program Management - use to describe issues such as poor internal communication, complete lack of a program, poor internal processes

Programmatic Agreement Propane Cylinder - use COMPRESSED GAS Protected Species - see Endangered/Protected Species QRP (Qualified Recycling Program) Radon REC - Record of Environmental Consideration Recordkeeping Recreation Recycling Red Bag Waste - use MEDICAL WASTE Refrigerant Recovery Equipment Registration Regulated Medical Waste - use MEDICAL WASTE Regulation - This is used to identify findings based on Federal, state, or local regula-

tions. Regulatory Library - This is used to identify findings mandating facili-

ties/installations to keep a library of environmental regulations. Release - an accidental spill or leak Release Detection Reporting Requirements Reservoirs Restoration Restricted Use Pesticides Rinsings ROWPUs - Reverse Osmosis Water Purification Units - equipment used to produce

drinking water Runoff Control Safety Sampling Sandblasting Secondary Containment Section 106 - use HISTORIC PRESERVATION Section 404 - use WETLANDS Security Segregation - separating different material or waste types Septic System


Sewage Sludge

Sharps

Shelf Life

SHPO - State Historic Preservation Officer

Signs

Sludge - for all sludge except sewage sludge (see SEWAGE SLUDGE)

Soil Conservation

Solid Waste Management Plan

SPCCP

Spill-use RELEASE

Spill Response Materials

Spill Response Team

Spill/Overfill Protection

Status - hazardous waste generator status

Storage

Storage Building

Storage Cabinets

Storage Locker

Storage Shed - use STORAGE BUILDING

Storage Tank - use AST - aboveground storage tank or UST - underground storage

tank when the finding indicates which one. Use storage tank when it cannot be

determined.

Stormwater

SWPPP (stormwater pollution prevention plan)

Survey

Swimrning pool

Tanker Truck Purging

Tier 2 - use EPCRA

Tier 1 - use EPCRA

Tires

Training

Training Activities

Transformers

Transportation

Trash

TRC - Technical Review Committee

Treated Wood

Treatment - general term for hazardous waste treatment


Treatment Works - identifies a facility and the wastewater collection system used for

the processing and conveyance of industrial and/or domestic wastewater. Use

WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM when the finding only refers to the col-

lection system or components of the collection system, and not the WWTP. Turbidity

Underground Storage Tank

UST

Universal Waste

Used OÜ

Vectors

Vehicle Maintenance

Ventilation

VOCs

Washrack

Waste Characterization

Wastewater Treatment Plant - use TREATMENT WORKS

Wastewater CoUection System - use WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM when

the finding refers to only the collection system or components of the collection system, and not the WWTP.

Water Cooler

Water Conservation

Water/Wastewater Reclamation - Use WATER CONSERVATION

Water Treatment Plant - use POTABLE WATER TREATMENT

Weapons Cleaning

Wellhead Protection Program

Wetlands

White Goods

Wildlife Management

Woodworking

X-Ray Lab - X-ray film processing facility or operations; X-ray developing room

Yard Waste


Appendix D: Trends by Legislative Authority

Trends for the Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard

Authority Active Army

Army

Reserve

Army

Guard

Clean Air Act 683 426 82

Cultural Resources 160 27 3

Clean Water Act 1539 831 751

Endangered Species Act 29 15 3

EPCRA 54 26 1

FIFRA 768 74 36

Multiple 314 284 4

Natural Resources 307 50 51

Noise Control Act 168 219 16

NEPA 249 83 65

National Historic

Preservation Act

172 57 65

OSHA 1033 1360 15

Pollution Prevention 94 82 8

RCRA-C 1536 893 628

RCRA-D 570 311 84

RCRA-I 447 125 134


Authority Active Army

Army

Reserve

Army

Guard

Safe Drinking Water Act 705 107 6

Superfund 52 70 20

TSCA 231 564 5

Trends for Active Army Major Commands

Authority AMC TRA- DOC

FORS- COM

MDW MED- COM

USAR- PAC

USMA

Clean Air Act 207 219 222 58 27 36 20

Cultural Resources 22 37 69 20 9 13 6

Clean Water Act 331 439 639 112 61 77 21

Endangered Species

Act

9 10 8 1 1 0 0

EPCRA 20 15 12 5 0 1 0

FIFRA 172 176 216 81 45 43 10

Multiple 59 67 67 41 10 28 14

Natural Resources 74 64 110 16 11 16 5

Noise Control Act 25 39 76 6 0 18 0

NEPA 111 48 57 7 6 12 2

National Historic

Preservation Act

76 15 52 9 5 5 3

OSHA 82 361 296 124 54 58 35

Pollution Prevention 16 19 31 5 2 17 0

RCRA-C 237 384 687 90 32 45 27

RCRA-D 66 171 219 43 17 33 20


Authority AMC TRA- DOC

FORS- COM

MDW MED- COM

USAR- PAC

USMA

RCRA-I 89 98 195 18 10 22 3

Safe Drinking Water

Act

125 195 179 69 35 45 17

Superfund 12 8 23 2 0 5 2

TSCA 88 46 47 11 5 22 5


Appendix E: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1994-2000 by Topic for the Active Army

FORSCOM

Topic Finding

Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE.3.1) Class 1

(i.e., open burning; permits; cold cleaner degreaser lids)

2. No or inadequate signs on fuel pumps (AE.55.2) Class 1

3. No or incomplete quarterly CFC procurement report

(AE.85.1.A) Class 1

3. Inadequate training for mechanics on freon recovery

equipment (AE.90.1) Class 1

Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National Regis-

ter (CR.5.1) Class 1

2. Inadequate management of historic properties affected by

undertakings (CR.5.3) Class 1

3. Inadequate historic preservation plan (CR.5.1.A) Class 3

Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (HM.45.1) HS

2. Containers of hazardous materials are not correctly labeled,

tagged, or marked (HM.1.3) HS

3. No or incomplete MSDSs (HM. 1.2) HS

3. No or inadequate written hazard communication program

(HM. 10.1) HS

Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Inadequate waste determination (HW. 10.1) Class 1

2. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1) Class 1

3. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (HW.3.1)

(i.e., training records; 90-day limit exceeded; satellite accu-

mulation points; labeling; unknown waste) Class 1


FORSCOM

Topic

Natural Resources Mgt.

Finding

Other Environmental Issues:

NEPA

Other Env. Issues: Noise

Other Env. Issues: IRP

1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR.1.3.A) Class 1

2. Insufficient vegetative cover to control dust and erosion

damage (NR.10.9.A) Class 3

3. No or inadequate survey of endangered and threatened spe-

cies (NR.20.1) Class 1

1. EA not produced when required (01.5.2) Class 1

1. NEPA implementation activities not executed (01.1.3.A)

Class 1

3. EA does not contain required information (01.5.20) Class 1

1. No or incomplete ICUZ study (02.1.3.A) Class 3

2. No or inadequate ICUZ committee (02.1.4.A) Class 3

3. No or incomplete operational data on noise producing ac-

tivities (02.1.9.A) Class 3

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (03.3.1)

(i.e., USTs; contaminated soil) Class 1

2. Inadequate removal site evaluation (03.1.2) Class 1

3. Inadequate screening for past use of hazardous substances

(03.1.3.A)CTass3

3. Inadequate community relations activities (03.10.2) Class 1

Other Env. Issues: P2 1. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete (04.5.1)

Class 1

1. Hazardous materials management is not considered an in-

tegral part of hazardous waste minimization (04.10.2. A)

Class 3

Inadequate implementation of P2 recommendations

(04.1.9A) Class 3

Inadequate consideration of P2 initiatives (04.5.2) Class 1

3.

3.

Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. l.A) Class 3

2. No or inadequate EQCC (05.1.6A) Class 3

3. Inadequate environmental training (05.7.l.A) Class 3

Pesticides Mgt. 1. No comprehensive IPMP (PM.1.4.A) Class 3


FORSCOM

Topic Finding

1. Inadequate pesticide storage facility (PM.45.4.A) Class 3

3. No or inadequate pest management coordinator (PM. 1.3.A)

Class 3

3. Inadequate pesticide mixing/storage sites (PM.45.3.A) Class

3

3. No or inadequate spill control kits (PM.45.8A) Class 3

POL Mgt. 1. Discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters (PO. 15.1)

Class 1

2. No or inadequate spill containment and cleanup materials

(PO.20.1) Class 1

3. No "USED OIL" label on containers other than tanks

(PO.65.6) Class 1

Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (SO.3.1)

(i.e., open dumping; waste tire storage; biomedi-

cal/biohazardous waste; permits; condition of dumpsters;

grease storage; training) Class 1

2. Inadequate participation in state/local recycling programs

(S0.25.1.A) Class 3

3. Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid waste

(SO. 10.1) Class 1

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Lack of "used oil" label on ASTs (ST. 125.1) Class 1

2. Lack of spill overfill protection for substandard USTs

(ST.30.1A) Class 3

3. Substandard USTs not upgraded, closed, or removed

(ST.25.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No or inadequate annual PCB document log (Tl. 15.1)

Class 1

2. Inadequate PCB items storage areas (Tl.40.2) Class 1

3. Inadequate >50 ppm PCBs and PCB items storage areas

(Tl.40.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or incomplete asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3

2. No or incomplete Installation Asbestos Management Plan

(T2.1AA) Class 3


FORSCOM

Topic Finding

3. Improper disposal of asbestos containing material (T2.15.1)

Class 1

Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (T3.3.1)

(i.e., radon reduction program incomplete) Class 1

2. No or inadequate mitigation of structures (T3.1.12.A) Class

3

Toxic Substances, LBP 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (T4.3.1)

(i.e., no lead hazard management program) Class 1

Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WA.3.1)

(i.e., unpermitted discharges; NPDES permit violations; re-

view of sanitary sewer service agreements; improper opera-

tion and maintenance of treatment systems; inadequate

secondary containment; permit limits exceeded; sludge re-

moval records not maintained; inadequate implementation

of stormwater pollution prevention plans) Class 1

2. No or noncompliance with existing state/Federal NPDES

for point source discharges (WA.10.1) Class 1

3. Discharges that would cause pass through or interference

at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1

Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WQ.3.1)

(i.e., abandoned wells not plugged; testing/disinfection after

water main repair; failure to notify public when levels ex-

ceeded; wells too close to possible source of contamination;

no cross connection control program; no emergency contin-

gency plans) Class 1

2. Inappropriate swimming pool operations and maintenance

(WQ.4.1.A) «ass 3

3. No SOP for alerting personnel of emergencies (WQ. 1.5.A)

Class 3


TRADOC

Topic Finding

Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE.3.1)

(i.e., permits; open burning; cold cleaner degreaser lid not

closed; inadequate emissions inventory; fugitive emis-

sions; incinerator operator training; gasoline tanks/pumps

do not meet requirements; insufficient recordkeeping; in-

adequate recordkeeping) Class 1

2. No or inadequate signs on fuel pumps (AE.55.2) Class 1

3. Immersion batch cold solvent cleaners left open. (AE. 116.1) Class 1

Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National Reg-

ister (CR.5.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate ICRMP (CR.5.1.A) Class 1

3. No or inadequate regulation of the excavation of archeo-

logical sites. (CR. 15.1) Class 1

Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Inadequate fire protection for flammable/combustible

storage areas (HM.35.9) HS

2. No or incomplete MSDS (HM. 1.2) HS

3. Inadequate flammable storage cabinets (HM.35.4) HS

Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (HW.3.1)

(i.e., improper storage; uncharacterized waste) Class 1

2. Inadequate waste characterization (HW. 10.1) Class 1

3. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1)

Class 1

Natural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR. 1.3.A) Class 1

2. No or incomplete survey of endangered and threatened

species (NR.20.1) Class 1

3. No or noncompliance with existing permit for discharge of

dredged or fill material to waters (NR.5.1) Class 1

3. Floodplains and wetlands are not identified/protected

(NR.10.2) Class 1

64 ERDC'CERLTR-01-34

TRADOC

Topic Finding

Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. No or incomplete preparation of an EA (01.5.4.A) Class 1

2. NEPA is not integrated into planning (01.5.1) Class I

3. EA not produced when needed (01.5.2) Class 1

Other Environmental Issues: Noise 1. No or inadequate ICUZ study (02.1.3.A) Class 3


3. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure (02.1.10.A)

Class 3

3. No or inadequate operational data on noise producing

activities (02.1.9.A) Class 3

Other Env. Issues, IRP N/A

Other Env. Issues, P2 1. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete

(04.5.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate use of life cycle cost analysis.

(O4.10.5.A)Cfass3

Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 1. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. l.A) Class 3

2. No or inadequate EQCC (05.1.6.A) Class 3

3. Inadequate training for environmental personnel

(05.7.1A) Class 3

Pesticides Mgt. 1. Inadequate pesticide storage facility (PM.45.4.A) Class 3

2. No or insufficient spill control kits (PM.45.8.A) Class 3

3. Noncompliance with pesticide storage requirements

(PM.45.1) Class 1

POL Mgt. 1. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials

(PO.20.1) Class 1

2. Discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters (PO. 15.1)

Class 1

3. Missing "USED OIL" label on containers other than

tanks (PO.65.6) Class 1


(i.e., open dumping; waste tire storage; unpermitted land-

fill; hazardous waste in landfill; landfill cover; landfill


TRADOC

Topic Finding

security; improper biomedical waste disposal; inadequate

recycling; improper grease storage) Class 1

2. Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid

waste (SO. 10.1) Class 1

2. Nonparticipation in state/local recycling programs

{SO.2b.lA) Class 3

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. No or inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage tanks (ST.5.1) Class 1

1. UST, no prevention of overfilling and spilling (ST.45.1) Class 1

3. Inadequate UST closure (ST.95.3) Class 1

Toxic Substances, PCB 1. Inadequate PCB items storage areas (Tl.40.2) Class 1

2. No ML markings for PCB equipment (Tl. 10.2) Class 1

3. Inadequate PCB shipping containers. (Tl.40.5) Class 1

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or inadequate asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3

2. No or incomplete identification of the existence, extent

and condition of all asbestos (T2.1.6.A) Class 3

3. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management Plan iT2.1AA) Class 3

Toxic Substances, Radon N/A

Toxic Substances, LBP 1. No or inadequate LBP Management Program (T4.1.3.A)

Class 3

2. No or inadequate notification of housing occupants of

potential LBP hazards. (T4.10.1) Class 1


(i.e., violations of pretreatment standards; unpermitted

discharges; inadequate implementation of stormwater

pollution prevention plan; open floor drains; oil/water

separator maintenance; oil water separator discharges;

noncompliance with discharge permits; inadequate spill

containment) Class 1



TRADOC

Topic Finding


3. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW (WA.25.2) Class 1


(i.e.. wells located near contamination source; abandoned

wells not plugged; no cross connection control program;

inadequate maintenance/training) Class 1

2. Inadequate swimming pool operations and maintenance

(WQ.4.1.A)CTass3

3. No SOP for alerting personnel of emergencies (WQ.1.5.A)

Class 3


Topic

Air Emissions Mgt.

Cultural Resources Mgt.

Hazardous Materials Mgt.

Hazardous Waste Mgt.

AMC

Finding

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE .3.1)

(i.e., unpermitted sources; incomplete permits; outdated

permits; inadequate recordkeeping; noncompliance with

permit requirements) Class 1

2. Inadequate refrigeration recovery and recycling equip-

ment (AE.90.5) Class 1

3. No or inadequate Title V permifair emissions inventory (AE.1.2) Class 1

1. No identification of historic properties affected by

undertakings (CR.5.3) Class 1

2. No or incomplete historic properties survey/National

Register (CR.5.1) Class 1

3. CRMO not designated/training inadequate (CR. 1.3.A) Class 3

3. No or inadequate preparation and implementation of an HPP. (CR.5.1.A) Class 3

1. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (HM.45.1)

HS

2. Extremely hazardous substances present/LEPC

(HM.25.1)

3. Noncompliance with SARA III requirements. (HM.30.1) Class 1

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (HW.3.1)

(i.e., inadequate labeling; unregistered accumulation

points; inadequate secondary containment; submission

of incomplete reports; incompatible storage; outdated

contingency plans) Class 1

2. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1) Class

1

3. 90-day limit exceeded on storage of hazwaste (HW.55.1)

Class 1


AMC

Topic Finding

Natural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR.1.3A) Class 1

2. Land management operations not consistent with mod-

ern conservation and land use principles (NR.10.7.A)

Class 3

3. No or inadequate survey of endangered and threatened

species (NR.20.1) Class 1

Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. Inadequate preparation of an EA(01.5.4.A) Class 1

2. Categorical exclusions (01.5.3A) Class 1

3. EAs not reviewed as action continues (01.5.7A) Class 1

Other Env. Issues: Noise 1. No or incomplete ICUZ study (02.1.3A) Class 1

2. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure (O2.1.10.A)

Class 3


Other Env. Issues: IRP 1. No or inadequate removal site evaluation (03.1.2) Class

1

2. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.

(03.3.1) (i.e., noncompliance with remediation schedule)

Class 1

Other Env. Issues: P2 1. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous sub-

stances (04.10. LA) Class 3

2. Inadequate pollution prevention plan. (04.1.4.A) Class 3

3. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete

(04.5.1) Class 1

Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. No or inadequate EQCC (05.1.6A) Class 3

2. No or inadequate training for environmental personnel

(05.7.1.A) Class 3

3. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. LA) Class 3

Pesticides Mgt. 1. No comprehensive IPMP (PM. 1.4.A) Class 3

2. Pest control contracts are not adequately reviewed and

approved (PM.1.7.A) Class 3

3. Inadequate pesticide mixing/storage sites (PM.45.3.A)

Class 3


:

AMC

Topic Finding

POL Mgt. 1.

2.

3.

SPCC plan inadequate (PO.5.2) Class 1

Missing "USED OIL" label on containers other than


No or inadequate ISCP (P0.5.3.A) Class 1

Solid Waste Mgt. 1.

2.

3.

Noncompliance with state and local regulations (SO.3.1)

(i.e., open dumping; inadequate security; improper dis-

posal of biomedical waste; improper disposal of asbestos

waste in landfill; improper disposal of dried sludge)

Class 1

Lack of segregation of recyclable materials from solid


Inadequate solid waste storage (SO. 10.1.A) Class 3

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1.

2.

3.

Inadequate UST release detection systems (ST.65.1)

Class 1

Noncompliance with state and local regulations (ST.3.1)

(i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate secondary

containment; inadequate monitoring/inspection; inade-

quate USTs not removed) Class 1

Inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage

tanks (ST.5.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, PCB 1.

2.

No or inadequate annual PCB document log (Tl.15.1)

Class 1

No ML markings for PCB equipment (Tl.10.2) Class 1

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1.

2.

No or inadequate asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3

No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management

Han (T2.1.4A) Ocas 3

Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Incomplete radon measurements (T3.1.3A) Class 3

Toxic Substances, LBP N/A


(i.e., noncompliance with permit requirements; improper


AMC

Topic Finding

monitoring/inspection; unpermitted discharges; inade-

quate spill control systems; inadequate implementation

of stormwater pollution prevention plan) Class 1



3. Inadequate analytical and sampling methods (WA. 10.5)

Class 1


(i.e., incomplete records; no cross connection control pro-

gram: outdated maps of distribution system; no public

notification after violation; inadequate monitor-

ing/inspection; inadequate radiological monitoring)

Class 1


MDW

Topic Finding

Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (AE.3.1)

(i.e., open burning; cold cleaner lid left open; incinerator

operation violating state standard; noncompliance with

permit requirements) Class 1

2. Noncompliance with CFC/refrigerant management

requirements (Multiple) Class 1

Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate ICRMP (CR.5.1.A) Class 1

2. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National


3. Inadequate long-term management of collections

(Multiple) Class 1

Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Hazardous materials containers are not labeled, tagged

or marked (HM. 1.3) HS

2. No or incomplete MSDSs (HM.1.2) HS

3. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders (HM.45.1)

HS

3. Inadequate flammable storage cabinets (HM.35.4) HS

Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Inadequate characterization of wastes (HW. 10.1) Class 1

2. 90-day limit exceeded on storage of haz waste (HW.55.1)

Class 1

3. SAP/accumulation point limits exceeded (HW.75.1)

Class 1

3. No or inadequate hazardous waste training (HW.60.1)

Class 1

Natural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR. 1.3.A) Class 1

Other Environmental Issues: NEPA N/A

Other Env. Issues: Noise N/A

Other Env. Issues: IRP N/A

Other Env. Issues: P2 1. No or inadequate P2 program. (04.1.14.A) Class 3


MDW

Topic Finding

Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. No or inadequate environmental support agreements

with tenants (05.1.13.A) Class 3

2. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6. l.A) Class 3

3. Inadequate communication (Multiple) Class 3

Pesticides Mgt. 1. Inadequate pesticide storage facility (PM.45.4.A) Class 3

2. No or inadequate spill control kits (PM.45.8.A) Class 3

3. Inadequate pesticide mixing/storage sites (PM.45.3.A)

Class 3

3. Noncompliance with pesticide storage requirements

(PM.45.1) Class 1

3. Unlabeled pesticide equipment (PM.45.17.A) Class 3

POL Mgt. 1. No or insufficient spill containment and cleanup materi-

als (PO.20.1) Class 1

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (PO.3.1)

(i.e., inadequate secondary containment; unpermitted

discharge) Class 1

2. Missing "USED OIL" label on containers other than



(i.e., open dumping; improper disposal of solid sludge;

waste tire storage; inadequate inspections at landfill)

Class 1



3. Inadequate solid waste storage (SO. 10. l.A) Class 3

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (ST.3.1)

(i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate UST label-

ing) Class 1

2. Inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage

tanks(ST.5.1)C/ass2

Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No or inadequate PCB inventory. (Tl. 10.1) Class 1


Topic

Toxic Substances, Asbestos

Toxic Substances, Radon

Toxic Substances, LBP

MDW

Finding

1. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management

Plan(T2.1.4.A)C7ass3

2. No or inadequate asbestos survey. (T2.1.3 A) Class 3

N/A

N/A

Wastewater Mgt.

Water Quality Mgt.

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WA.3.1)

(i.e., unpermitted discharge; visible spill; incomplete

stormwater pollution prevention plan; inadequate sec-

ondary containment) Class 1

2. Discharges that would cause pass through or interfer-

ence at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1

3. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW (WA.25.2)

Class 1

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations (WQ.3.1)

(i.e., no cross connection control program; no contingency

plan; inadequate monitoring/inspection; incomplete re-

cordkeeping) Class 1

2. Inadequate swimming pool operations and maintenance

(WQ.4.1.A)C/ass3

3. No or inadequate records of actions taken to correct or

repair the distribution system (WQ.1.3.A) Class 3


Topic

Air Emissions Mgt.

Cultural Resources Mgt.

Hazardous Materials Mgt.

Hazardous Waste Mgt.


MEDCOM

Finding

1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations

(AE.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted sources; cold cleaner lids

left open; no vehicle emission testing) Class 1

No certification of recycling and recovery equipment.

(AE.90.1) Class 1

1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National


2. No or inadequate ICRMP (Multiple) Class 1

1. Hazardous materials containers are not labeled,

tagged or marked (HM.1.3) HS

2. Improper storage of compressed gas cylinders

(HMA5.1) HS

3. Inadequate housekeeping in hazardous material stor-

age areas. (HM.1.4)#S


(HW.3.1) (i.e., uncharacterized waste; improper man-

agement of hazardous waste containers; discharge to

sanitary sewer) Class 1

2. Inadequate characterization of wastes (HW.10.1)

Class 1

3. Inadequate hazardous waste storage area. (HW.80.4)

Class 1

1. No or inadequate INRMP (NR.1.3.A) Class 1

2. No or inadequate Endangered Species Management

Plan (NR.20.2.A) Class 3

3. Inadequate natural resources law enforcement per-

sonnel (NR.1.16.A) Class 3

Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. Inadequate integration of NEPA into planning.

(01.5.2.A) Class 1

Other Env. Issues: Noise N/A


MEDCOM

Topic Finding

Other Env. Issues: IRP N/A

Other Env. Issues: P2 1. Inadequate procurement of recycle content products

(04.6.1) Class 1

Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt. 1. Insufficient funding and staffing (05.6.1.A) Class 3

2. Inadequate communication (Multiple) Class 3

Pesticides Mgt. 1. Inadequate pesticide storage (PM.45.1) Class 1

2. No DD Form 1532 completed (PM.1.6.A) Class 3

2. Unlabeled pesticide equipment (PM.45.17.A) Class 3

POL Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations

(PO.3.1) (i.e., inadequate labeling; visible spills; inade-

quate recordkeeping) Class 1

2. Insufficient spill containment and cleanup materials

(PO.20.1) Class 1

Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Lack of participation in state/local recycling programs

(S0.25.1.A) Class 3

1. Lack of segregation of solid waste from medical waste

(SO. 110.4) Class 1

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations

(ST.3.1) (i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate

inspection) Class 1

1. Inadequate secondary containment for bulk storage

tanks(ST.5.1)C7assl

Toxic Substances, PCB N/A

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or inadequate asbestos survey (T2.1.3.A) Class 3

2. No or inadequate asbestos management plan

(T2.1.4.A) «ass 3

Toxic Substances, Radon N/A


Topic

Toxic Substances. LBP

Wastewater Mgt.

Water Quality Mgt.

MEDCOM

Finding

1. No or inadequate notification of housing occupants of

potential LBP hazards (T4.10.1) Class 1


(WA.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted discharge; noncompliance

with permit requirements; inadequate secondary con-

tainment) Class 1

2. Discharges that would cause pass through or interfer-

ence at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1

3. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW

(WA.25.2) Class 1


(WQ.3.1) (i.e., no distribution materials survey con-

ducted; uncertified operator; no cross connection con-

trol program) Class 1

2. No or inadequate emergency SOP (WQ.1.5.A) Class 3

r by

Top

ic f

or

W)

a fa

-u

'■£

4> o C

•2

£ o u C o 2

1

ca

1 cu SM

13 o o

u o o>

-4J c3

+J CO

CD

CO

H <!

CO

C ©

'42

CD

i- 4) c ca CD

'o o

i

a '5

- CD ft O U ft s C CD

ft O

«2 c o

'42 ca - CD ft o

o

ca In CD

C 3

co" fi O

'co CO

£ CD

4) _> '42

■a

CO CD

■~

fi o CO

CD

£ •- CD ft

4)

ca

cr 4)

"Ü ca c

'S) C

'ft CD 4)

O o 4) U

■ft ft ca o +J

4) •- _d

'3 fa T

itle

V p

erm

its.

(AE

.1.2

)

r-i oi

-fi a CD

£ X) i

i •- o

ca •~ CD

_C 'u C

c 1

(0 p*

a> o C •2

CD lp

13 u o

i—I

CO

CD

S-, CD

CD

-PJ

a SH

4)

ft s O u c o

£ 4) ft

T3 ca

_fi

en"

b£ c 'fi

J2

c CD ft o

4)

ST fi

(0 o (0 o

d • PH

'S ti

• PH

fa

a. S o u C o 2

13 fi 03

4)

ca co

CO C

ca

fi ca CD

'S u

ft C s fi 4) ft O

co" 4) o

fi o CO

J3

CD O

C ca

fi 4)

£ 4) S-

'3 cr

ca ■-

+J

4)

CO

cr

u 4) ft O SH

ft £

c _o '42 ca ■~ 4) ft O

4) ■ — -fi ft

•fi ^ be PH

.5 8 LL o o r-i

£ ~

Ü cu 4 i«

rfi

& 4)

CD CO CD u SM

o CO

TJ CD -u

s CD

ft c 3

4) C I

i CD

T3 ca

_fi

en" C o

"m

i 4)

ca

a- 4)

T3 ca

£? o

LU

c >-

«so

PH • pH

fa

4> u

c .2 "a. £ o

13 o o

T3 C ca CD

ca CO

r-1

CO

CO

fi

CO

T>

S* 4) c ca 4)

C !- fi

-Q

C 4) ft O

O CJ 4)

4)

ca

cr

> '42 •a «3 b£ c

CO

fi o

'en CO

£ CD

CD

o '-fi

ca t, bD 4)

c fi ® 3 CO

R fi

c LL c

o 2

o •l-P

r2 2

CJ

c 4) ft O

-fi ca

_fi ft CD CD

en

£ CD

ca fi cr

fi CD > ° 5 u ft

> "O E

<

1—1

c ■ ■■■

<*

rfi

"5 3 be 4>

CD CO

fi _©

'cQ CO

e 0)

+1»

£ T3 4)

1

4)

i en

£ 4)

^ r2

0 >

s 4>

a en

i—i ca cj o

1—1

CO

H

CD

ft c

ft X! 4)

ca fi cr

S-t

'3 ^3

o

CD CD u

fi ca ^^ ■i^ be < T) £

4) ft >

CD

+3

t-l CD > c CO

C _o 'to

•r- 4)

Q.

o <

0

d -3 d fa

ft S o o fi o 2

C ca

ca CO

en a o

'42 a

ca fi cr CD

T3 ca c

C o

fi CD > fi

fi O CO

TJ 4)

co

£ 4) ft

ca

!- O

o 2

CN

<

* 'S e 4> fi fe CJ S-c

fi 2 O pfi

2 ^

|2 JC T-i CN CO

■ ■ £ ■&

Li. ■s o CO

X 3 0

•P* fi o

■ ■■■ in 0 CO

■Ö pd H CO

s c Tf

0 Q.

05

<

a <

j>> CD 1 ■

o 0 u C

"E cu In 03

cr

CD

s 0)

< i—i

in

0) be

c 03 c

i 03 N

'5 a be

o

-3 cu

03 3 cr

u 3 tn tn cu

'-+3

tn

•Ee CD

OS

be 03

a> a)

3 00 cu 5 5

p. ^"s cu

T3 •- CD

cd i—i

o "1 Ö • PH

C

fa

"a o H 03 -a 03 <| C3 ft e o cj c o

55

'S, £ o o

o

ft u Ü

<

o ft

3 cr cu

T3 03 c

c 03

c cu E

ft O c

_o

IM

T—i

OS o

C

o o 2

o

ft

o

•3 OS cd cj

cu 5

CM T—i CM

i 1

3 en ft ■~

i > —

£ cr> -o o

CU C75

« < c w cu 3 tn

cr >=H

tn

IS tn

I-i

in

OS o

0-'

OS a i—i

cu , be cd

IM g

a • PH

fa

03 3 03

s 0)

03 3 cr CD

T3 03 3

I—t

N

'3 3 be ■~, o

13 3 03 -u 3 CD

s

s_ o

<u p. cd ft O

3 o • --

<; CM

r-i

0) -*J 03 3 cr CD

13 03 c

o o

55

E 3 ft

"3 «H c o tn

.1 tn

CM

in

s p 03

'~ cu o o

55

o CJ cu

-o C cd be

_C

o CD •-

c cu 3

_ft '3 cr CD

u cu

Ö

<

.3

5 03 u

-*J ■~ cu o o

55

cu > o o cu '—

c 03

cu be

cu

CD

cd 3 cr cu

03 _c u o o

55

3 tn

tn cu

t CD

ft O u ft u

•E o

"Go cu

OS

15 c

_o '■3

03

1 cu >

rH

in OS o c CD

CU

03 3 O4

CU 13

03 C

o o

<5

03 N c '5

CD O

03 13 3 C er cd

^ 3

£ £

<M CO CO CO i-i (M CO

U o -u cd u O ft o

I- o +J tn

i CD

i tn

i 1 J3 3 1

03 SH

a) _S 'Ö 3

E o o 3 o c

e SM

cu ft tn

+-> 3

0) +J 03 3 cr CD

ft E 3 ft

%

be 03 C 03

E CD

03 N

"c 03 be

o

s C8

c cu E

s •- cu

13 cu

-»-3 03 3 cr cu

3 tn

tn CD

Vi

'be cu

OS 'a T—1

C

03

o be c

•E 3

13

cd

s. tn ^v

8 w

T3 •FH

fa

o -M 03 s-l CD

C 'o

s- 0) a o

£

Ö _o '•3 03 u tu a. o

cu u 3

■2 "a.

s

3

a>

13 03

_S

o o

55

a c o tn

en

CN

in in

CO

3 cr cu

Cd

c

ft C3

ft "o c o

<

<

■a 03 c t- o o

55

cu ft o

ft o

•E o

c o

+3

cu >

in OS o

c CD

-t-3

tn C o o o 2

O

CO CD

,3

o OS

2 if 5 3

IN CO i-i CM

tn

< tn i IS ■^ cu CD u ^ CD

T—1

<M

03 3 cr

in OS

cu

03

•E ft

5t- O -u C CD

E

"■6 cu ft

CD

3 3

CO +j

in § OS CT

be $

CU •a

03

Ü o

ft >>

cd

-a c fa

tn C

_o

G

u o o

55

r-!

OH'

S PS Ü 1—t

o u ft ft 03 a

cu be C3 3 a £

o •E o tn

^3

13 CU o

cd

tn 3 bo 7 .3 o •% ° 5 55

CO

tn cu o t.

Ö 3 o

• 1-1 tn a 0)

0 K H i—i

CO

3 ■(->

"5 ü

bc d

S3

50 .05

bt ö

d

tu d

■ PH

d

o> bc cö C

2 0

cö 3 O" 01

-3 03 3

CO

ft o s-,

u •c

c 3 >>

■3 Cü

o

t2 c*—

03

CO

in

bo 3

3

01 T3

o £ ■-

Cü

& cö ft

«<—i

o 3 o ü

2 W

-§ ö cö

o o

CO

ü

CD CJ

3 cö

3 ÖD

*" i—!

13 CN In 03

T) CD

fr.

33 r3

03 3 o

«4-

o 01 bo cö

CM

bc •>*

cu »n 03 03 03

CÖ

3 er

CÖ

3

t-, o

03 •- Cü

'S ° .s z

o cj

CÖ N CÖ

.3 3 Oi

■c

bc o i. & 3 o

*-3 cö CJ

'S 3 e

Cü o 3 .2

e o ü 3 o

3 bc o) ^ >-. ,_*-

'S CQ

Cü 2 01 fr !- 0)

T3 3

o 3

ffl

N s* T1 3 cö 03

Xi 03 <1) C+-c O CÖ

CÖ r/3 1——<

IH Cü CD +J rt CÖ +■>

'm s u Cü

3 o 03

3 r>

o U

03

3

o CO

'S H bc 2 CÖ pH

o 0) bc cö s- o

u Cü a o u ft s

>> CJ

03 CÖ bc

o> 03 03 0) In ft

lO

ffi

03 u Cü

T) 3

cö ,3 'S

Cü CJ

3 3

o CJ

3 o

CÖ <N

03 2 T3

03 fr

ffi

Cü

,3

o Cü bc cö

•-Ö S

CJ

03 CÖ bc -3 cü 03 03 Cü ■-.

ft £ o CJ

E

03 SH

Cü

3

T3

cö N 3

,C <+- o 03 >H

Cü

3

3 o ü

o 3 Cü u cö

cö ■c

Cü

cö

6 03

3 o

-3 03

"ÖS -Q cö

03

cö

o

'S H bc 2

3 HH

co

(1) 3 +J n CÖ

o cö

's cü +J S -4J m s—\ CÖ r: r-< 3 3 er 03 S

Cü

CJ

o 1—1

CJ CJ cö

T3 cö 3 §

i—« "3 co

oq

-a Cü

Cü 0) o X Cü

• 3 LO

.s £

T3 03

T3 03 03 u X 03

CO

CO

o

cö 3 er 0)

-3 3 3

3 _o '■Ö cö N

•c 03

CJ 3 - 3

JS

3 bc 03

— CO CÖ ^

K ^ ^ E w ft T3 ^

03 03

03 CÖ

o CJ

3 o

3 cö

CJ cö

o 3

I-H

C-3

3 o ' ' o i—1 -t->

SH UJ o •4J

3 £ 3 OJ

cö 3

•c 03

ffi S 3 o

er CJ 03 o 03 m 0) cö

T3 cö 3

I—1

cö

CJ

03 CÖ

L5 CO

T3 03

03 03 CJ X 03

S • .3 in

•S ^'

cö 3 cr cü

-3 cö 3

03 CJ

3 cö

3 o

bc d

■i-i

d

i CD

^ 03 ra 'Eö 03 01 03 in

Cü ft O LH ft CJ

•c o

3 3 o

Z in

CJ cu o u ft 0) IH

IC 03 3 3 er 03

3 3

in co

s 3

u a 3 o

CD S

3i w y Cö 03

3

e o

03 CÖ 03 IH 3 03 bc CÖ

03 CJ

3 .2 'ft S o CJ

3 o

S3

CN

3 bo 03

CÖ CN

03

73 03 fr in 03

r3

K

03

CÖ

& « 03 rH

1 s s* o

«4-1

o

ü cö

03

co Q co

o

o CD -U CÖ

3 er 03

X! CO 3

<*H ^-^ o i—i 3 3 ö o

•l-H o i—i «i

-t-> cö ^ 3

V 03

K s w 3

CJ 03

m 03 cö

cfl ri

03 CÖ §

CJ ■s CO

CD

03 CD

X Cü

3 1—1

in ^™ r^ 3 ^ o ft K

0) CJ 3

• 2 "ft s o CJ

3 o

S3

o H

ft 03 3 Cfi o In

3

3 0) N -M CÖ CÖ

SU S

03 3 o

T) !H 3 N 3 ft

80 ERDCCERLTR-01-34

ISC a

• PH

C

fa on s

tora

ge

of h

az

was

te. (

HW

.55.

1)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

INR

MP

. (N

R.1

.3.A

)

2.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(N

R.3

.1)(

i.e.

,

inad

equat

e er

osio

n

cont

rol; s

tate

lis

ted

endan

ger

ed s

peci

es)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

surv

ey o

f en

dan

ger

ed

and t

hre

aten

ed s

pe-

cies

. (

NR

.20.

1)

«0

bo a

a fa m

anag

emen

t of

90-

day

sto

rag

e si

te;

un

-

char

acte

rize

d w

aste

;

imp

rop

er m

anag

e-

men

t of

haz

ard

ou

s

was

te c

onta

iner

s; i

n-

com

plet

e m

anif

ests

)

3.

90-

day

lim

it e

xcee

ded

on s

tora

ge

of h

azar

d-

ous

was

te.

(HW

.55.

1)

1.

Lac

k of

or

inad

equat

e

INR

MP

. (N

R.1

.3.A

)

2.

Cu

rren

t st

atu

s of

on-

goin

g ag

reem

ents

or

enfo

rcem

ent

acti

ons

not

exam

ined

.

(NR

.1.1

)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

surv

ey o

f en

dan

ger

ed

and t

hre

aten

ed s

pe-

cies

. (

NR

.20.

1)

3.

Flo

odpla

ins

and w

et-

lands

are

not

iden

ti-

1»

c •1-1

C

fa stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

on

s.

(HW

.3.1

)

(i.e

., im

pro

per

lab

el-

ing;

unch

arac

teri

zed

was

te;

imp

rop

er s

at-

elli

te a

ccum

ula

tion

po

int

des

ignat

ion;

in-

adeq

uat

e in

spec

tio

ns)

1.

Lac

k or

inad

equat

e

INR

MP

. (N

R.1

.3.A

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

surv

ey o

f en

dan

ger

ed

and t

hre

aten

ed s

pe-

cies

. (N

R.2

0.1)

3.

(NR

.1.5

.A)

fa stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(HW

.3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e se

c-

ondar

y c

onta

inm

ent;

inad

equat

e la

beli

ng;

unre

gis

tere

d a

ccum

u-

lati

on a

reas

; in

com

-

ple

te m

anif

ests

; in

-

adeq

uat

e tr

ainin

g)

1.

Lan

d m

anag

emen

t

op

erat

ion

s n

ot

per-

form

ed c

on

sist

ent

wit

h m

od

ern c

onse

r-

vat

ion a

nd l

and u

se

pri

nci

ple

s.

(NR

.10.

7.A

)

2.

Lac

k of

or

inad

equ

ate

INR

MP

. (N

R.1

.3.A

)

3.

Insu

ffic

ient

vege

ta-

tiv

e co

ver

to c

ontr

ol

du

st a

nd e

rosi

on

dam

age.

(NR

.10.

9.A

)

•>*

0 H

Nat

ura

l R

eso

urc

es

Mgt

.


S 1.

I

nad

equat

e m

anag

e-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tio

n o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(01

.1.2

.A)

1.

EA

not

pro

duce

d

when

nee

ded.

(01

.5.2

)

2.

Inad

equat

e or

lac

k of

imple

men

tati

on o

f

NE

PA

. (0

1.1

.3.A

)

3.

No

or i

nco

mple

te

pre

par

atio

n o

f an

EA

.

(01.

5.4.

A)

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te

ICU

Z s

tudy.

(02

.1.3

.A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e as

-

sess

men

t of

the

effe

ct

of n

oise

. (0

2.1.

5.A

)

CO

IDC

C

fied

/pro

tect

ed.

(NR

.10.

2)

1.

NE

PA

not

inte

gra

ted

into

pla

nnin

g.

(01.5

.1)

2.

Inad

equat

e m

anag

e-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(01.

1.2.

A)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

pre

par

atio

n o

f an

EA

.

(01.

5.4.

A)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICU

Z s

tudy.

(02.

1.3.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICU

Z c

omm

itte

e.

(02.

1.4.

A)

10

a T3 Ö

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

pre

par

atio

n o

f an

EA

.

(01.

5.4.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

in-

tegra

tion o

f en

viro

n-

men

tal

revi

ew w

ith

pla

nn

ing a

nd d

eci-

sion

-mak

ing.

(01.

5.2.

A)

3.

NE

PA

not

inte

gra

ted

into

pla

nnin

g.

(01.5

.1)

3. C

ateg

oric

al e

xclu

-

sion

s (0

1.5.

3.A

)

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

ICU

Z s

tudy

.

(02.

1.3.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICU

Z c

omm

itte

e.

(02.

1.4.

A)

be s

C

1.

Cat

ego

rica

l ex

clu-

sion

s.

(01.

5.3.

A)

2.

NE

PA

not

inte

gra

ted

into

pla

nnin

g.

(01.5

.1)

2.

EA

s not

revi

ewed

as

acti

on c

onti

nues

.

(01.

5.7.

A)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICU

Z s

tudy

.

(02.

1.3.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICU

Z c

omm

itte

e.

(02.

1.4.

A)

0 H

Oth

er E

nvir

on-

men

tal

Issu

es:

NE

PA

Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

Noi

se

82 ERDCCERLTR-01-34

05

bjo a

S3

.05

bx Ö

• PH

S3

05

be

05

be

a

o H

CO

3 cr a»

03

c

o o

55

CO

a o CJ

<D en 'o c

3

cu c o

—< 3 a -a

« < C _J

_C

o o

55

cj

3 CU

CO

O

o E

o> -a cc c .te o

cu t£ c3 C 03

s 3 cr CÜ

C3

C

i 1 c o F n C3

s-, o CD

o u cu

4-1

to C o

CM

O

T3 c 03

3 < CM

CO

3 cr

d

"öl CO

o o ^H 01 - ^""

C

£ c o

CO

o 'U

CS c 'S *—' HH +J

CO

'o s

Ö 03

3 CT o>

13 s

.3

o o

55

CO

o

a

CO '_l

£ w

o o 01 s- 3

"Ö 01 Ü

CD 3

« 3 3 -5 cr ca

c o o c o

55

b£ ■£, ,j_r

2 p o CS CO -Q

T3 c CS

3 3

3 o

en 0>

"3 0>

3

'-2 CO 01 > 3

0) 3 "" 3

0) tX 3

0) ^N

£ 3 tuO .2 3

•c o

'S o

3 3 cr cu 3

_B

I« o o

55

CM

3 > CU

CO

O

3 N ^ 3 ITt 3 •-

o

£ 3 tx o Co cu

+J u. 3 -3 3 3 3 a cr 3 «« o> o

T3 CS

3

3 a) 3

3 o

cu ■ a 3

0> C in

ti—i 3

o a i cu cu

4J CO

_3 15 > cu o>

'en

13 > o £

cu s cu -t-3 no cu o

3 _o

< O) ^ f ^ 3 3 cr CM

3 3 cr

en en cu

CO

"3 o 3

3 rr

CO 0)

"a 3 en

CO

3 o

cu u 3 's

1—1

CO

cu -3

CS

3

•- o o

55

CO

o 3 O

'-£3

01 T3 3 C u o o

55

CO 3

3 3

'S CU

s cu U

•3 3 3

3 _o '5 3

.bo '-C en cu >

a) "S 3

_S

SH

o o

55

01

3 cu

E J2 "3. 6

CO

o

55

E o o C

u o o

55

o -t-J

0)

'5 > 3

3 3

E !- CU -u 01

T3

< in

T—i

CO

O

.2 "a E o u 3 o

55

T3 3 S 01

CS

CO

CO

o en 3 o

s

oo co

cu 'O 3

_S

u o o

55

CM

2- O

CU I*

3 -d

cu o

be _c 'B 01 Öl

3 3 cr « a c

CD en 3 +J tn 3 a •-

c2

to cu Ü c 3 +J en

,£> 3 tn co 3 o

•3

3

a> a cu u. 3 u

o* ^ 4) O

3 3

co O

T3 3

_B

k. o o

55

CM

3 _o '■£ 3 3

s 3

3 cu

m co P o

fe g -•

cu tc 3 3 3

6

CM 0!

3 o l. o

3 3 cr cu

T3 3

-3 3 3

-*J 3 cu s

3 _o '^ 3 N

'S 3

M

O

CO

O

3 3 cr cu

T3

£ & o .5

tn cu cu co CO

3

a 55 a

■a CU

CO

O

c _o

3

co cu >

s 3 a* cu

T3 S C

CO

o

o o

55

CO

CD

3 to en

> 3

cu OH

o S

c T«H i r» +3

SH o LO

bo CO

3 4-

1

TJ .2 3 CD > CD

CD

as 3

O 3 3

£ s CO be

o CO 3 o o

'a CN

be Ö 3

0) TJ

CO

6 3 3

o TJ 3

a> a cd ft <

0

cd

3 =*H o

LO

rr" O

S • PN

+3 3

■—<

"3 PH

3 CO

u E o u

cr £

St— O

3 _o +3

CN

i—i

o

er 01

-d cd C

s _o

cd SH

01

CO CD

_> '■+3

CN CO

0) , bo cd cd N c 'S

E be

cd 3 cr CD

-d cd 3

TJ c cd

-4-» a 0)

4H

o

SH CD a cd ft

3 cd

cd ■c ft o u ft ft cd Ö

3 o SH

'> C CD

c CD

£ Ol bo cd

bo c

-3 c

.3

to .OS

a • PH

d • PH

«5 .A

toe Ö

• PN

TJ S3

Ö _©

+3 ö 01 > 01 SH

ft 3 o

o OH

^ , 01 i—l CD t

SH o LO

be m

cd N 4-

3 cd 'So

0) -4-» cd 3 er 01

O

CD

c cd

B CD

c cd bo •~ o

SH

O

s- 01 ft

cd 3 cr CD

co o u 0)

Id > CD

Ö

o ro a

rC u cl)

TJ cd TJ cd < m o *rH -w

cd 3 3 ft ri >> co CD c bo

c U. er cd t*-i CN o

s cd

1—H ft © u .3

CD TJ cd

s ►—1

3 CD

s

o 3

_o '+3 o

o o

55 «4-C o "cd Ö cd

CO

3 o SH

o LO cd

•c Ö ti) M* 01 0) > 3 O cd 01 SH

3 rr1 S

ft 01 rn

ö o

TJ cd rl

01 r—1 ft

3 o

TJ -M 3 C

s cd o N

o a, cd CD cd ft c X

o C

Ö CD

E 0) bo cd C cd

3 cd

TJ CD u 01

'co c o

T) N

cd s cd Ö CN u

43 en O

S Ö i-H

3 cd

01

CO cd

■e cd ft

o ft £ o o

cd

ho

CO 3 o

a 3 o

3 bo CD LH

13 M 0)

01

M 01

43

CN

o

CN CO

CD i bo 3 cd N ß 'S 2 § E bo _~ 3 -a 3 3 cr 3

Cd rn 3 c

■-

O

^ i- CD ft 3 ft

e*-. o 3 o

bo 3

TJ 3

,3 +J CU ^ 3 3

< 0) S CN 5*3

3 ■4-3

i—l e*H 3

C/J

LO 13 o 3 3

H-1 « LO

o

3 CD

0 -n 3 3 cr 0)

T3 3

_B

w O

o

CN

01 bo 3 3 3 3 3 i- ^ 3. bo oi 3

-4-> _~ 3 TJ 3 3 cr 3 CD ^

N ^

X) 3 3

o

01 ft 3 ft O ,-H

ho 3

'S 3

eH

< .2

ho 3

Ü 3 r-| e*3 3 CO 3

co CD

T3 3 3

LO

O

cd 3 CT <D

"Ö 3

_C

i- O o

55

.Si

tu c

Ö

o H

3 01 VH -n o

ho Ö

3 ■E 01

ft E o CD a

o o

CO CD 3 co co

> 3 H M Ol

r3

3 co co 3 o

-a 3 N 3

r3

o 3 •-

3 01

s 0) bo 3 3 3

co 3 o

TJ SH 3 N 3

3 3

TJ 01 M CD

TJ '35 3 o CJ

TJ

3 N 3

43 Ci—I O

3 ft

13 bJD

3 ^5

.5 < 3 CN

co 3

co 3 O

O

o 3

TJ O M ft

TJ Ol M 3 o o H

P-.

CO

> o o CD

O

e^—i

0) TJ 3

co 3

s < 'S LO M r-i cu 5; s- O 0) w

01 bo 3 3

3 3

3

3 cr 01

TJ 3 3

co CD 3 co

U

be

Ä < T3 3 o 3 co 3 bo SH

CD

3 cr CD

i—i

LO' e2

bo ft y-*. T> o 3 t-i

TJ 3 3

3 ft V- o

< CN

i-i

3 .3

SH

.2 'G ^4—

e*H 3 CO

3 <D

E 3 o

'-*3

LO

o O

o 55

3 CO 3

M

TJ 3 3

CN

CO +J i—i fab

CN PL,

> 3

SH CD

43 +-> o

3 SH ho o SH

PH

84 ERDGCERLTR-01-34

be C

t> XI

I® c ** -) L «C

-u W) 3 a 0

• PH u TJ 5s

a 3 i*H en I* Ö

CD rH

be 3

5 «

Xt C 3

CO

in O

3 3 cr cu

-o 3 C

■- ©

o 2

t> id O

3 to 3 a-

cu XI 3 C

in O

CO

o o 2

CO

O

<

a; ^

§ CU

2 £3

en cu P.

CO 3 cr 4)

T3 3 C

>>

1 ** Si § 2 *=

cu =

cu •3

4> a

a 3 CT cu

XS CO C

en

be

* < 3 CO

-e CU

4)

2 3 a* 4>

-3 CO

_c

o o 2

-3 C CO

a. en

CO

•c cu eO 3 _

a 3 c

.0)

be a

a

- o a a 3 tn

C CD

s o

-= CO

a . w in © O

4) > en 3 CU

4>

a £ o o o 2

< 41

TT 3

:: §• 3 4> S5 -3 *—' 3 w C

CU S cu

o o 2

o o

3 4)

6 4) fcC CO c 3 E en CU a

CO

4) O 3 3

O o 3 o 2 CO

4) IH

4) be 3 l* O

-4-> en

4) XS

en 4) a

en

£ s E S

■g S

CU -3

CO 3 rr +J en 0) 3 3

TO 4) •r 3 h a; C 3 CO

o 3 3

E a 7—1

o o 3 3

Ö CM

a 3 'a

en

3 CU

W < s CO

r-i in

be O a • f-<

13 O a O •H

CU X) G 3 o en

41 4) 3 4) <

o bn

CU a >> 3

-1 O ad 3 _C

hr ^ ^.^ CT r3 in o X 3

t2

tu < CD T-l

a en

Tf CD E -*J 3

CD

E CD •~

"3 a-

Tf 3 4) § 3 3 a- cu

-3 3 3 **

4) CD

E o 2

CU be 3 u o en

m

CU

S

s-, O o 2

-3 'G '-£ en 4) P.

CU_

en

^3

3 'G +3 en CD ft

S " in

s

3 3 cr CD

-3 3 3

X) 3 3

C CU

C

'cfl

u 41

- .3 co •- o

3

3 o

en

3 3 CO cu

.05

be a

a

OH o

CO

in O

tn CD

^_, 1

O

CD *~V +i <: > <J JS I-H cu C

3 CU

CU

a E o

s CL,

i i-H o en CD

-3

o «2 bo _£

'en en

Ö

X) 4)

X! 3

in

cu

3 3 cr 4)

X) 3 C

E 4)

CO

C 3

CU o f= o i- £ o o 2 CU

1—1

en CD

CU

~a3 be 3

o C

o cu

o o 2

tn CD P.

CO

u o +-> 3 c

X)

o

ft

tn CD xi

en 4)

CU

o 3 41

^^ CO

3 rH CT

~ in CU TO o be 3

o > O 3

<1) 3 CM s_ be S-H

s—' o u c d_ 3 W o X a a> A:

3 o

S o 03 3

ft

o PH

0> 0)

■Q ■~ CD Xi et) es <i) CO k.

ij -fi o

c o a

o CD

'S ?*> HH CD m

ttt O Q

k. CD e '3

cä

C CD

0) SH

s e 3

i—i

ö i—i

d PH

o

• pH

Ö • pH

co

o

c o o

c o

cö

fi es

CD

O PH

'G .3

o

3 CO

fi

a

es e o

■& a>

co <35

c • PH

Ö •PH

in 0S

bfl C

• PH

nö Ö

•IN

CN CO

O Q co p bc C

.3 2

CD k

c

c o cj

c o

fi cS -u fi CÖ

rfi -4->

SH

0> nfi

CD o fi CÖ

cö n

8 p

CD

CÖ

fi

co id co

O PH

S rt PH fi3 ft fl ^ n, fi c . CD o u c o

CD

C o

rfi >

fi O u

& CÖ

C o u 0) CD

CS

fi

0>

CS

3 O* 01

XJ CÖ fi

bß PH c co ft 01 01 ^ ki O cj Ol kl

01

CÖ

er 5^ a> in

CÖ c

O PH

CM CO

ü O PH CO

CÖ

fi> <N

es fi

CN

fi bß CD SH

o PH

fi CÖ

C CÖ

o PH

CD

C o

CD -o

CÖ c co" fi

ß o CJ

fr es

TJ fi O CJ CD

ft S O o c o ß

> er

u ^^ CD +-> ft fi . «

-±3 fl £ 01

s-, CD 3 u C <1> cö s-

•fi bo * S CD __,

c cö

CÖ w

8 Q ;ß — co ft -fi w

c o 2

CD

fi o

CD bß cö in o

CD ki

SH o ft CD C CÖ «H

+3 kl CD ft o SH ft £

c CD ft O

CD CÖ

o fi o

es fi er CD •fi es

_e

bc c

3 -fi

cö Q.

CD bc es - o CD

CD CD es CD •- bß

es 3 er CD

cö

4> — CD "^ fi cö

3 bß 01 ki

~ CO

o cj fi o

-fi C cö CD

c _o '-C co

0) -fi CÖ

c •FH

TJ CD

fi

o o fi

kl o

•r-l

fi o

es 3

CD ■3 es ß

fi _o '■Ö u 41 ft CD a

c

CD

ft E fi CD

cö 3

CD T3 3

^C

cu u C eö fi CD

Oi p5

4) ,_,

fi 3

CÖ PO

O ;s ~ co

o CJ

C o

c 3 fi

O

3

in C 3

13 CD

s kl 01 ft fi fi

3 T3

3 bß CD ki ki 01 ft o - ft

3

"es cj

'S CD

s

3 3 CT CD

T3 3 C

CÖ CD O ft

C o fi of bß 3 ki o

CD CD 3 CD ki bß

3 3 CD- CD

"Ü 3 ß

C CD

5 S ."S CD

* • =

"I* .05

bfl S

• FH

U • pH

o H

T3 C 3 jj CD

g l s s

.S o

c o CJ

ft CD

ft 3 fi 3 CD

01 i bß 3 3 N c '3 S bß oi o

e 3

3 3 er CD

"Ö 3 ß

•Jsi SH

o

01 ft 3 ft

H-H o ß o

01 cj ß 3

oi ,—, kl rH

"es W

d

O

"3 CD O

ft

T3 fi 3 •-

.s >; 5 - M ^

o PH

o cj fi o

ti

CD 3

'S co

T3 fi 3 CD

C

3

ki CD ft O ki ft

CD bß

TJ 3

-d

o CD

•c 3 cj 0) CD

CD

3 3 er

fi CD

CD bß 3 Ö 3 Ä S J3 k, T3 CD c ft cö O i—i

ft o

CD i bc 3 3 C 3

6 4)

3 3 er CD

CS

c

C 3 bß ki o

fi 3

fi CD

86 ERDC/CERL TR-01-34

05

d

fl

tion i

n s

tate

/loca

l re

-

cycl

ing

pro

gra

ms.

(S0.2

5.1

.A)

3.

Lac

k of

seg

regat

ion o

f

recy

clab

le m

ater

ials

from

sol

id w

aste

.

(SO

. 10.

1)

3.

In

adeq

uat

e so

lid

was

te s

tora

ge.

(SO

.lO

.l.A

)

1.

Inad

equ

ate

US

T r

e-

leas

e det

ecti

on s

ys-

tem

s.

(ST

.65.

1)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(ST

.3.1

)(i.

e.,

inad

equat

e U

ST l

a-

beli

ng;

inad

equat

e

spil

l/ov

erfl

ow p

rote

c-

tion

; in

adeq

uat

e

fl • PH

fl E im

pro

per

dis

po

sal

of

regula

ted m

edic

al

was

te;

was

te t

ire

stora

ge;

inad

equat

e

clos

ure

pla

n)

2.

Inad

equat

e se

gre

ga-

tion

of

recy

clab

le m

a-

teri

als

from

sol

id

was

te.

(SO

. 10.

1)

3.

No

np

arti

cip

atio

n i

n

stat

e/lo

cal

recy

clin

g

pro

gra

ms.

(S0.2

5.1

.A)

1.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu

-

lati

ons.

(ST

.3.1

)(i.

e.,

unre

gis

tere

d s

tora

ge

tan

ks;

inad

equat

e

seco

ndar

y c

onta

in-

men

t; i

nad

equ

ate

spil

l/ov

erfl

ow d

etec

-

tion

)

2.

Inad

equ

ate

US

T

iß

fl 'S fl

inad

equ

ate

met

han

e

monit

ori

ng;

was

te

tire

sto

rage;

asb

esto

s

disp

osal

in l

andf

ill;

open

dum

pin

g)

2.

No

np

arti

cip

atio

n i

n

stat

e/lo

cal

recy

clin

g

pro

gra

ms.

(S0.

25.1

.A)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(ST

.3.1

)(i.

e.,

un

reg

iste

red s

tora

ge

tanks;

in

adeq

uat

e re

-

cord

keep

ing;

inad

e-

quat

e se

condar

y c

on-

tain

men

t; i

nad

equat

e

mon

itor

ing;

ina

de-

quat

e U

ST

s)

&

fl 'S fl

tion o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(S0.1

.2.A

)

3.

Inad

equat

e se

greg

a-

tion o

f re

cycl

able

ma-

teri

als

from

sol

id

was

te.

(SO

. 10.

1)

1.

Mis

sing "

US

ED

OIL

"

lab

el o

n A

ST

s.

(ST

. 125

.1)

2.

Inad

equat

e sp

ill

over

-

fill p

rote

ctio

n f

or s

ub-

stan

dar

d U

ST

s.

(ST

.30.

1A)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

US

T c

lo-

sure

. (S

T.9

5.3)

O •i-i CM 0 H

ti 03

3 ca

EH o> bo ca u o

CO


l>

a •rH

C • PH

fa seco

ndar

y c

on

tain

-

men

t)

3.

In

adeq

uat

e m

anag

e-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(ST

.1.2

.A)

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

an-

nual P

CB d

ocu

men

t

log.

(Tl.

15

.1)

2.

No

ML m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B e

quip

men

t.

(Tl.

10.2

)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

PC

B

item

s st

ora

ge

area

s.

(Tl.

40.2

)

3. I

nad

equ

ate

man

age-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(T1.

1.2.

A)

3. I

nad

equ

ate

stora

ge

area

s fo

r P

CB i

tem

s

conta

inin

g g

reat

er

«0

tec Ö

•PH

c fa re

leas

e det

ecti

on s

ys-

tem

s.

(ST

.65.

1)

3.

Subst

andar

d U

ST

s

no

t upgra

ded

, cl

osed

,

or r

emov

ed.

(ST

.25.

1)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e an

-

nual

PC

B d

ocu

men

t

log.

(Tl.

15.1

)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egula

-

tion

s.

(Tl.

2.1

)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

PC

B

item

s st

ora

ge

area

s.

(Tl.

40

.2)

two ö

•TH

d •PH

fa

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e se

c-

on

dar

y c

onta

inm

ent

for

bu

lk s

tora

ge

tan

ks.

(ST

.5.1

)

3.

Inad

equat

e U

ST

re-

leas

e de

tect

ion

sys-

tem

s.

(ST

.65.

1)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e an

-

nual

PC

B d

ocum

ent

log.

(Tl.

15.1

)

2.

No

ML

mar

kin

gs

for

PC

B e

quip

men

t.

(Tl.

10.2

)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

PC

B

item

s st

ora

ge

area

s.

(Tl.

40.2

)

be a

•i-i

d fa

1.

No

ML m

ark

ing

s fo

r

PC

B e

quip

men

t.

(Tl.

10.2

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e an

-

nual

PC

B d

ocum

ent

log.

(Tl.

15.1

)

3.

(T1.

1.2.

A); I

nad

e-

qu

ate

>50

ppm

PC

Bs

and

PC

B i

tem

s st

or-

age

area

s.

(Tl.

40.1

)

0 H

Tox

ic S

ub

stan

ces,

PC

B


l>

be Ö

Ö fa th

an o

r eq

ual t

o

50pp

m.

3.

In

adeq

uat

e oper

a-

tional

pro

cedure

s at

PC

B s

tora

ge

area

s.

(Tl.

40

.4)

«3

1.

Inco

mple

te r

ado

n

mea

sure

men

ts.

(T3.

1.3.

A)

2.

(T3.

1.8.

A)

c X! C

fa

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te a

s-

bes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e In

-

stal

lati

on

Asb

esto

s

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n.

(T2.

1.4.

A)

3.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egula

-

tion

s.

(T2.

2.1)

1.

Rad

on m

easu

rem

ents

not

per

form

ed.

(T3.

1.3.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

to

c

C • PH

fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e In

-

stal

lati

on

Asb

esto

s

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n.

(T2.

1.4.

A)

2.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e as

-

bes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

A)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

man

age-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion

of

pap

erw

ork

.

(T2.

1.2.

A)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(T3.

3.1)

(i.e

.,

inad

equat

e ra

do

n r

e-

be C

d fa

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te

asbes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

A)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e In

-

stal

lati

on

Asb

esto

s

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n.

(T2.

1.4.

A)

3.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

iden

tifi

cati

on o

f th

e

exis

ten

ce,

exte

nt

and

cond

itio

n of

all a

sbes

-

tos.

(T2.

1.6.

A)

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

mit

igat

ion o

f st

ruc-

ture

s.

(T3.

1.12

.A)

2.

Rad

on m

easu

rem

ents

o •1-1

OH 0 H

Tox

ic S

ub

stan

ces,

Asb

esto

s

Tox

ic S

ubst

ance

s,

Rad

on

05

be =

-0 ti

• pH

fa

3.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h

stat

e/lo

cal

regula

-

tions

(T3.

3.1)

(i.e

., no

radon r

educt

ion p

ro-

gra

m d

ocu

men

ta-

tion

).

«0

be g

'S c •H

fa post

-mit

igat

ion s

am-

plin

g.

(T3.

1.13

.A);

No

or i

nad

equat

e w

ritt

en

radon p

olic

y.

(T3.

1.14

.A); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e pre

par

atio

n

and s

ubm

issi

on o

f

ann

ual

rep

ort

s.

(T3.

1.15

.A)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egula

-

tion

s.

(T4.

2.1)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

LB

P m

anag

emen

t

prog

ram

. (T

4.1.

3.A

)

«5

be a

Ö • IN

fa duct

ion

prog

ram

)

2.

Rad

on m

easu

rem

ents

not

perf

orm

ed.

(T3.

1.3.

A); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e m

easu

re-

men

ts o

f Pri

ori

ty 1

stru

cture

s.

(T3.

1.4.

A); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e m

itig

atio

n

of s

truct

ure

s.

(T3.

1.12

.A); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e po

st-

mit

igat

ion s

ampli

ng.

(T3.

1.13

.A); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e w

ritt

en r

a-

don

poli

cy.

(T3.

1.14

.A)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egula

-

tion

s.

(T4.

2.1)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

on

s.

(T4

.3.1

)(i.

e.,

be =

C fa n

ot

per

form

ed.

(T3.

1.3.

A)

3. N

o or

in

adeq

uat

e

dat

abas

e.

(T3.

1.16

.A)

<

0 H

Tox

ic S

ubst

ance

s,

LB

P

90 ERDCCERLTR-01-34

be S

C 1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e/lo

cal

reg

ula

-

tion

s.

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

nonc

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

per

mit r

equ

irem

ent;

vio

lati

on o

f p

retr

eat-

men

t st

andar

d;

un

-

per

mit

ted d

isch

arg

e;

inad

equ

ate

storm

wa-

ter

poll

uti

on p

reve

n-

tion

pla

n;

inad

equat

e

mai

nte

nan

ce)

2.

No

or n

onco

mpli

ance

wit

h e

xis

ting

stat

e/F

eder

al N

PD

ES

for

po

int

sour

ce d

is-

char

ges

. (

WA

.10.

1)

3.

Dis

char

ges

that

wou

ld c

ause

pas

s

thro

ugh o

r in

terf

er-

ence

at

the

CO

s & be c

•H

d

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(WA

.3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e se

c-

on

dar

y c

onta

inm

ent;

un

per

mit

ted d

is-

char

ge;

inad

equat

e

sto

rmw

ater

poll

uti

on

pre

ven

tion p

lan;

im-

pro

per

mai

nte

nan

ce;

inad

equ

ate

reco

rd-

kee

pin

g o

f sl

udge

re-

mov

al;

nonco

mpli

-

ance

wit

h p

erm

it

requir

emen

ts)

2.

Dis

char

ges

that

wou

ld c

ause

pas

s

thro

ugh o

r in

terf

er-

ence

at

the

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

1)

be s

d

inad

equat

e m

anag

e-

men

t)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(WA

.3.1

)

(i.e

., unper

mit

ted d

is-

char

ge;

inad

equ

ate

seco

ndar

y co

nta

in-

men

t; n

onco

mpl

ianc

e

wit

h p

erm

it r

equir

e-

men

ts;

no b

ackup

pow

er a

t W

WT

P;

un

-

cert

ifie

d oper

ators

)

2.

Dis

char

ges

that

wou

ld c

ause

pas

s

thro

ugh o

r in

terf

er-

ence

at

the

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

1)

3.

Intr

od

uct

ion o

f po

l-

luta

nts

int

o

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

2)

be c

d

1.

Lac

k of

or

no

t m

eet-

ing r

equir

emen

ts o

f

stat

e/F

eder

al N

PD

ES

for

poin

t so

urc

e di

s-

char

ges

. (W

A.1

0.1)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(WA

.3.1

)

(i.e

., unper

mit

ted d

is-

char

ge;

inad

equat

e

seco

ndar

y c

onta

in-

men

t; i

nad

equat

e re

-

cord

keep

ing;

ex-

ceed

ed e

fflu

ent

lim

itat

ions;

non

com

-

pli

ance

wit

h p

erm

it

requir

emen

ts)

3.

Intr

oduct

ion o

f po

l-

luta

nts

into

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

2)

V • 1-4 a 0 H

u CD

CO

CD

CO ca


t>

•PN

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

1)

1.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(WQ

.3.1

)

(i.e

., no

cro

ss c

onne

c-

tion c

ontr

ol

pro

gra

m;

impro

per

wel

l cl

o-

sure

; no

dis

infe

ctio

n

of r

epai

rs;

no e

mer

-

genc

y re

sponse

pro

-

gra

m;

inad

equat

e

secu

rity

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

P2

eval

uat

ion

.

(WQ

.2.1

.A)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

man

age-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion

of

pap

erw

ork

.

(WQ

.1.2

.A)

«0

be a

• PH

S3

fa

3. I

ntr

oduct

ion o

f po

l-

luta

nts

in

to

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

2)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(WQ

.3.1

)

(i.e

., no

cro

ss c

onne

c-

tio

n c

ontr

ol p

rog

ram

;

inad

equ

ate

monit

or-

ing/i

nsp

ecti

on;

no

emer

genc

y co

ntin

-

genc

y pla

n)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egula

-

tion

s.

(WQ

.2.1

)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

man

age-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion

of p

aper

work

.

(WQ

.1.2

.A)

c

Ö

fa

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(WQ

.3.1

)

(i.e

., im

pro

per

wel

l

clos

ure;

im

pro

per

sam

plin

g; n

o cr

oss

conn

ecti

on c

ontr

ol

prog

ram

; no

dis

infe

c-

tio

n o

f re

pai

rs;

non-

com

plia

nce

wit

h

per

mit

req

uir

emen

ts)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egu

la-

tion

s.

(WQ

.2.1

)

3.

Inap

pro

pri

ate

swim

-

min

g po

ol o

per

atio

ns

and m

ainte

nan

ce.

(WQ

.4.1

.A)

c

fa

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(WQ

.3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e re

-

cord

keep

ing;

no

cros

s

conn

ecti

on c

ontr

ol

pro

gra

m;

un

cert

ifie

d

oper

ators

; w

ells

nea

r

conta

min

atio

n

sour

ce;

nonc

ompl

i-

ance

wit

h p

erm

it r

e-

quir

emen

ts)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egu

la-

tions.

(WQ

.2.1

)

3.

(WQ

.4.3

.A)

• p* a 0 H

Wat

er Q

ual

ity M

gt.

92 ERDGCERLTR-01-34

O P

■a 3 o

CO 05

, CO J-

o

i be a

a

a» +J cd

er CD

CO

«4- o

c CD

E

S c o

"cd

CD O

C cd

"3 to CD

"cd Ö

_o

CD

.—I

CO CO CD

CD 4J cd 0 er CD

cd

i* 3 CO

CO CD

'•+3 s- CD

ft

'to CD S-,

Id C o

CD

cd 3 er a>

cd

< to

pi

CD to cd 3 cd

E CD

cd

cd N

'c cd to •- o

o

CD

ft crt

_3 ID to 5 u.

s o u c o

55

-o c < jd

'-£ cd a.

c O u ft Ü

V o

4J cd T—1 #C

PH 3 c

cd a

CM

o o

55

cd C CO

a

CO

Ü

O "a} "a

a CD -^> cd

CO

CO C o 4-i

s-, o o

55

5 CD >

IM o o

55 DH

CD

cd c

>—1

4J C CD

E

O

a _o *4J

i—i oi T—1 CN CO

0) P

be

S o o c o 3 i- o

'3

'ä? "a, cd

3 er CO

cd

"o 4-> a CD

E

1 C

"cd

CD u C

.2 "a

cd o

_o

C cd CD 4J on

s.

(i.e

., par

ti-

CD

cd 3 a" CD

cd

< CO

T-i

PEJ Ü

CD 4J cd 3 er CD

X) cd

CD to a C cd

E

CO

C o

*4J

ü ■^

1

c cd

E 0!

4-> cd

o

C 3

1 cd ft o c o

• pH

-0 c

«*H o

u ea

r-i

CD U

C

.2 'S.

+->

s t~ o o

55

CN

CD to cd 3 cd

E

5 CO

o fa Ü

2 '-3

E o u c o

55

CO

cd CO

regula

ti

(AE

.3.1

)

cula

tes)

- o o

55

T-i

PH

u •-. o o

55

CN

CD

to c o

O 4J c CD

E

.5" 3 er CD

T3 cd c

r—1

CO

C CD

E CD to cd

4J cd N

'2 3 to

J3 -t-> ä <»

CO

C O

1 CD to

I cd

CO * CD ^ cd N ^ p o u I-I C

cd

s c o

£ c Cd co

9 CO en

cd to

bfi .2 o f—1 e CD

4-i o CD

ft ^^ C a T3 0) cd TJ cd <

S o o C o

55

C CD 3 C ft CM'

TH* a Cd

a> +J cd

-t-> en

CO

Ö o

cd

4J

■a

er CD

X) cd c

h-t

cd 4-1 C CD

E

o c

_o *3

r-i r-i

tfn CO CD

P, S-

to Ö o

3 o co CD

0 CD to

s

<

"a

3

"3 ft


©

E Ö

-3 S3

oi

Ü

03 bo Ö

-3 Ö

o

1.

Inad

equ

ate

stora

ge

at

90-d

ay a

reas

(M

ulti

-

ple)

2.

Inad

equat

e or

lac

k o

f

char

acte

riza

tion o

f

was

tes.

(HW

.10.

1)

05

S3 T3

S3

fa perw

ork.

(CR

.1.2

.A)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h F

eder

al s

afet

y

requir

emen

ts n

ot

in

chec

klis

t.

(HM

.2.1

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

haz

ard c

omm

unic

a-

tion

pro

gra

m.

(HM

.10.

1)

3.

Impro

per

sto

rage

of

com

pres

sed

gas

cyli

nder

s.

(HM

.45.

1)

1.

Inad

equ

ate

stora

ge

at 9

0-da

y ar

eas

(Mul

tipl

e)

2.

Inad

equ

ate

or l

ack

of c

har

acte

riza

tion

of w

aste

s.

GO

S3 -0

S3

fa

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

Fed

eral

req

uir

emen

ts

no

t in

che

ckli

st.

(HM

.2.1

)

4.

Fai

lure

to

imple

men

t

a h

azar

do

us

mat

eria

ls

man

agem

ent

pro

gra

m.

(HM

.1.5

.A)

2.

Tra

inin

g r

egar

din

g

haz

ardous

chem

ical

use

in l

abora

tori

es.

(HM

.15.

2)

2.

Impro

per

sto

rage

of

com

pre

ssed

gas

cyl

in-

der

s.

(HM

.45.

1)

1.

Inad

equ

ate

or l

ack

of

char

acte

riza

tio

n o

f

was

tes.

(HW

.10.

1)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

Fed

eral

req

uir

emen

ts

no

t in

che

ckli

st.

a 0 H

Haz

ardous

Mat

eria

ls

Mgt

.

Haz

ardous

Was

te

Mgt

.

T3 01

o o

HI ~o

<V 4> o X CD

3 < 01

1 c

01 r-

r 0) c

"o r

4)

o I-, ft <

o 0) -a

SB c

CO

i-i

cd 03

3 cr

01

03

o to

s 3 C ft

to

T3

03

3 rr

c 'a

o 1—1

r-i

tec E 3 6

I—1 o fc "-»"

o>

03

<*- o

u.

c < 0>

-c C3

'■3

01 T3 03

a. E

CM

o • FH o

3

co

lO V- P-, S Pi- lz; t—t

tl be a; rr^ c 3 'o ft

o

o 03

l-J

I* O

O

'£ 'is u

S u pi o

o 2

5 to 3 o u

01 be c 03

T3

Ö 00

pi

<f

o o 2

o 01 to

'3 c

a) u 3

-3 01 o

CO T-i t>j CO 2 r-i

os Ö o

in i 01 c o 0)

-t-> 01 ,3

tec £ 3

X a> 03

|

C • f-i o ft

XS CO

_c u o

OH"

0)

03

£7

<

03

3 a- 01

XI 03 O

5 ft n

< CO

03 3 cr 01

xs 03

tr. o

3 01

ai to

'o 3

o rH o T3

0) XI 0> a>

o

03

CO

r-i PS 2

C

o o

tx c

'3 •—

0)

E o> •—

.o

Pi

c

o o 2

£ to CO 01 to to 03

o

til

-< CO r-i CO 2 i—i

XJ 1 a>

01 0) 1 m ^—V 4)

CO 3 _o +3 03

3

13 0) a> u X 0)

be CO

Ö CO

6

03 N

'S 03

E?

U o

01 ft 03

3 a*

-3 03

C

< CO

rH

pi

01

03 3 cr

to aj u

3 o to

C 03

c

be 03

3 03

E

03 N

'S 03 bo

o

tec a v-v

£ 3

-M

'o ft

03

O

X3 < o g T3

03

01 Pi

0)

E < 01

01

o T3

V ft ^ o3 <; ft ■

O rH

3 rH

.2 O d

•PH

fa

u o 03

CO

ID t>

3 cr o>

XS 03 c

1—1

03

Ö

e

ft tr-, O

3 _o '■+J

co 1—i

5

1« o

o 03

OH

cd r?

3

O

O

03 s-, 3

+J 03

2

Ol be 03

C 03

s

in r-i pi 2

3 cr 01

xs 03

C

c 03

+->

3 0)

E <f,

CO r-i <N' CO r-i r?

03

to a 0) o 0)

E 01 3 o 1 c to

• M o o <1 to

0 H

to o>

'äs In

03

■—

'> c

Cd s- C

W s_ 01

X, -4-1

o

01 to

'o 2

o

i d

C

<

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

pro

cure

men

t of

recy

-

cle

conte

nt

mat

eria

ls

(04

.6.1

)

1. I

nad

equat

e co

mm

uni-

cati

on (

Mul

tipl

e)

1.

Inad

equat

e pes

tici

des

sto

rag

e or

mix

ing a

r-

eas

(Mul

tipl

e)

0)

be d

♦ PH

S3

(02.

1.5.

A)

2. N

o or

in

adeq

uat

e

nois

e co

mpla

int

proc

edur

e.

(02.

1.10

.A)

1 1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

pro

gra

m t

o im

ple-

men

t th

e P

2 p

lan

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

pro

cure

men

t of

re-

cycl

e co

nte

nt

mat

e-

rial

s (0

4.6

.1)

1. I

nad

equ

ate

com

-

mu

nic

atio

n (

Mul

ti-

ple)

1.

In

adeq

uat

e pe

sti-

cide

s st

ora

ge

or

mix

ing

area

s (M

ul-

CO

s a TWO S3

•0 d

1.

Lac

k of

imple

men

ta-

tio

n o

f P2

reco

mm

en-

dat

ions.

(04.1

.9.A

)

2.

Pro

cure

d p

roduct

s not

mad

e fr

om r

eco

ver

ed

soli

d w

aste

.

(04.

1.11

.A)

1. I

nad

equat

e tr

ainin

g

for

env

iro

nm

enta

l

per

sonnel

. (0

5.7

.l.A

)

1.

Inad

equat

e m

anag

e-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tio

n o

f pap

erw

ork

.

Topic

Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

IRP

oq •OH

en CD 3 en en

> c

SH

CD

O Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

Pro

gra

m M

gt. ti s

en CD

"o '-C en CD

O O

too a

a

c 4) 'y w 3 4-3 »3

3 u d a*

F. •r 9)

T3 c -tJ

d CO s a

c E a. ^H

o o 3 c

o CN

o C3 'a.

d

-2 6 OH

0) be o a> d S-,

o co n T3

+J en d 01 0) -*-> HI d

a CD

co 3 d cr 01

is Tf T) d ■rt

C u O

05 05

bO S3

• PH '

S3 a;

"a

d 3 a*

d C

c 0)

E s '3

-4-J d E a 3 C

T—1

Ö CN

Ö s d UH

o -a:

o 01 ^-^ o u r/i o T1

d Q. C d H-l co d U

be «41 O 01

CO I.

O co C T3

-*-» u to

-u d

m a) d s-

d a O)

cn 3 d o" ■s

T) TJ d C

■u c 'S

h-H CO

GO 05

to a

a

o H

CN

0) _> '35 C o>

01

p< s o u o

<

5J

PH

o d t.

+J

3 o u 0)

T3

fc Ö £

d

3 d

01

o>

01 In -u o c

< T-i

PH

T3 o> > O

a.

c o> 6 0) ho d C d

to D

PH

•>#

cu 01

E +j o c o

T3

C 3 O 12 3 a* 0) IH

3 o

-a c d

in ~ .K

— .5 PH a> « HH

3 3 o CO u Ol OH

d Ü

t 01 o

3 01

CO 01

-a

0) PH

d s-

_o 'E

01

01 T3 s- O

co u V 3 W

Tf

PH

d 3 a* o>

T3 d 3

o d

c d Ü 01

S r o 0) PH

3 d CO d E ^-, C*H

O 3 n, >i o 3

3 o a CN o

5. to

d 01 O

PH o d

PH

ft

o PH

01 •4J CO d

3 "o CO

©

E ÖD C

• PM

S3

fa clab

les(

SO

.lO

.l)

1. I

nad

equ

ate

of la

ck o

f

seco

nd

ary c

onta

in-

men

t fo

r bulk

sto

rag

e

tanks.

(ST

.5.1

)

25 < 25

0)

tec Ö

• IN

= • PH

fa

© i—i

d CO

CO 0)

1

1. In

adeq

uat

e of

lack

of

seco

ndar

y co

nta

in-

men

t fo

r b

ulk

sto

r-

age

tan

ks.

(ST

.5.1

)

< 25 1.

N

o or

inad

equat

e

Inst

alla

tion

Asb

es-

tos

Man

agem

ent

CO

ten Ö •rt

T3 C

fa recy

clin

g pro

gra

ms

and p

roce

dure

s.

(S0

.25

.2.A

)

1.

Inad

equat

e st

ora

ge

of

con

tam

inat

ed r

eus-

able

sh

arp

s.

(SO

.110

.1)

1. N

onco

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(SO

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

impro

per

dis

posa

l of

infe

ctio

us

was

te)

1. In

adeq

uat

e of

lack

of

seco

ndar

y c

on

tain

men

t

for

bu

lk s

tora

ge

tan

ks.

(ST

.5.1

)

< 25 1.

N

o or

inc

ompl

ete

as-

bes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

A)

Topic

ti

Ö CO H

CD be cfl ■~ o

CO Tox

ic S

ub

stan

ces,

PC

Bs

Tox

ic S

ub

stan

ces,

Asb

esto

s

98 ERDC/CERL TR-01-34

o

E a

• IN

S3

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

noti

-

fica

tion

of h

ou

sing

occu

pant

s of

po

ten

tial

LB

P h

azar

ds.

(T

4.10

.1)

1.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(WA

.3.1

)

(i.e

., u

np

erm

itte

d d

is-

char

ge;

WW

TP i

nop-

erat

ion

al)

05

S3 TS d

< T—i

CN

c es

CÜ < z 1.

N

o or

inad

equat

e

noti

fica

tion

of h

ous-

ing

occu

pant

s of

po-

ten

tial

LB

P h

azar

ds.

(T4.

10.1

)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

an

d l

ocal

regula

tions.

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

un-

per

mit

ted d

is-

char

ge;

WW

TP i

n-

op

erat

ion

al)

CO

be S3

• IN

S3 • IN

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

Inst

alla

tion

Asb

esto

s

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n.

(T2.

1.4.

A)

< z

< Z 1.

N

onco

mpli

ance

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal r

egu-

lati

ons.

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

unper

mit

ted d

is-

char

ge;

WW

TP

inoper

atio

nal

)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

NP

DE

S r

epo

rtin

g r

e-

quir

emen

ts.

(WA

.10.

2)

3.

Fai

lure

to

surv

ey

ü a 0 H

Tox

ic S

ub

stan

ces,

Rad

on

Tox

ic S

ub

stan

ces,

LB

P

u 0)

-4-> es

CÜ

w cs


o

i d

fa

1.

In

adeq

uat

e m

on

ito

r-

ing/s

ampli

ng

(M

ulti

-

ple)

0)

two a

Ö fa

1.

In

adeq

uat

e m

oni-

tori

ng/s

ampli

ng

(Mul

tipl

e)

be d

d fa st

orm

wat

er d

is-

char

ge.

(WA

.10.

4)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

ons.

(WQ

.3.1

)

(i.e

., u

np

erm

itte

d d

is-

char

ge;

inad

equ

ate

monit

ori

ng/i

nsp

ec-

tion

)

2.

Inad

equat

e m

anag

e-

men

t an

d o

rgan

iza-

tion o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(WQ

.1.2

.A)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

mai

nte

nan

ce o

f

swim

min

g p

ools a

nd

swim

min

g a

reas

.

(WQ

.4.3

.A)

o H

13

It 0)


Appendix G: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1991-1998 by Topic for the Army Reserve

Topic Finding

Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations.

(AE.2.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate emissions inventory. (AE.1.3.R)

Class 3

Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties sur-

vey/National Register (CR.5.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate consultation with the SHPO

(CR.5.3) Class 1

3. No or inadequate regulation of the excavation of

archeological sites (CR.15.1) Class 1

Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate MSDSs (HM.1.2) HS

2. No or inadequate coordination with the fire de-

partment (HM.1.3.R) HS

3. Containers of hazardous materials are not correctly

labeled, tagged or marked (HM.1.3)HS

Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. No or inadequate inventory of hazardous waste

(HW.1.4.R) «ass 3

2. Inappropriately operating as a CESQG (HW. 15.1)

Class 1

3. No CESQG training records are maintained

(HW. 15.3) Class 1

Natural Resources Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate survey of endangered and


Topic Finding

threatened species (NR.20.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate ground maintenance (NR. 10.l.R) Class 3

3. Lack of or inadequate INRMP (NR. 1.3.R) Class 1

Other Environmental Issues: NEPA 1. No or inadequate integration of NEPA into plan-

ning (01.5.2.R) Class 1

2. No or inadequate maintenance of NEPA regulations

(Ol.l.l.R) Class 3

3. No or inadequate management and organization of

paper work (01.1.2.R) Class 3

Other Env. Issues: Noise 1. No or inadequate ICUZ study (02.1.3.R) Class 3

2. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure

(O2.1.10.R) Class 3

Other Env. Issues: IRP 1. No or inadequate screening for past use of hazard-

ous substances (03.1.3.R) Class 3

2. No or inadequate removal site evaluation (03.1.2)

Class 1

Other Env. Issues: P2 1. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous

substances (04.10.l.R) Class 3

2. No or inadequate Hazardous Waste Minimization

Program (O4.10.2.R); Inadequate written pollution

prevention plan (04.1.4.R) Class 3

Other Env Issues: Program Mgt. 1. No or incomplete file of environmental regulations

(05.1.1.R) Class 3

2. Inadequate training for environmental personnel

(05.7.1.R) Class 3

3. No or inadequate rapport between the Environ-

mental Officer and the support MACOM environ-

mental office (05.8.1.R) Class 3

Pesticides Mgt. 1. No or inadequate review of pesticide contracts

(PM.1.7.R) Class 3


Topic Finding


(PM.3.1) (i.e., improper storage; inadequate record-

keeping) Class 1

3. Non-DOD pesticide applicators are not certified

(PM.5.1) Class 1

POL Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate spill containment and

cleanup materials (PO.20.1) Class 1

2. No copy of SPCC (PO.5.1) Class 1

3. No or inadequate SPCC training (PO.5.7) Class 1

Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Nonparticipation in state/local recycling programs

(S0.25.1.R) Class 3

2. Installation personnel not periodically informed

about materials prohibited from disposal

(SO.10.3.R) Class 3

3. Inadequate markings on food waste containers

(SO.10.4.R) Class 3

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. Inadequate closure of USTs (ST.95.3) Class 1


(ST.3.1) (i.e., inadequate UST closure documenta-

tion; inadequate training; inadequate secondary

containment; inadequate monitoring/inspection;

unregistered storage tanks) Class 1

3. Substandard USTs not upgraded, closed, or re-

moved (ST.25.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No ML markings on PCB equipment (Tl.10.2)

Class 1

2. No inspections for >500 ppm PCB transformers

(Tl.20.7) Class 1

3. No or inadequate PCB inventory (Tl.10.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or incomplete asbestos survey (T2.1.3.R) Class 3

2. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Manage-

ment Plan (T2.1.4.R) Class 3


Topic Finding

3. No or inadequate protective equipment for asbestos

personnel (T2.1.7.R) Class 3

Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Radon measurements not performed (T3.1.3.R)

Class 3

2. No or inadequate measurements of Priority 1 struc-

tures (T3.1.4.R) Class 3

3. No or inadequate long-term measurement of Prior-

ity 2 and 3 structures (T3.1.6.R) Class 3

Toxic Substances, LBP 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations

(T4.3.1) (i.e., paint chips) Class 1

Wastewater Mgt. 1. No or inadequate surveillance of stormwater dis-

charge (WA.10.4) Class 1

2. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW

(WA.25.2) Class 1

3. Discharges that would cause pass through or inter-

ference at the POTW/FOTW (WA.25.1) Class 1

Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations

(WQ.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted discharge; inadequate

secondary containment; inadequate maintenance;

inadequate implementation of stormwater pollution

prevention plan; no grease traps; noncompliance

with permit requirements) Class 1

2. No or inadequate monitoring for lead and copper

(WQ.50.6) Class 1

3. Inappropriate use of pipe, solder, or flux that con-

tains lead (WQ.25.1) Class 1

ü

.2 n (5 a)

8 S .2 8

"£ 5> 111 1- c >

— LL (/) ^ Ö) (I) C >

13 0) C (0

X

C a> Q. Q. <

00

be a

-a a

t* .«

bo a

C

CO .A

be

be a

a

.os

be a •»*

-o a

o

o ej c o Z

73 c 3

cu

fa < to C o

3 tx

CD

CD -a

CU a c 3

.-• o

c T, t£ i") 3 0) "Z >—- CU 3 CJ CD 3 ^ Tr, *-* CO CT CU

a> <D a. ,3 S-, c ,_ "3 ifc^

T-, o U. O 3 3 o O

o -fcj

>->

en

£ o CJ 3 O

25

o '■ZJ 3

ho «3 •-

0)

'53 he fa

<

C

O o

25

be _c 'a. cu cu

bx

TJ 3 3

CO

3 3 cr cu

-3 3

pB

U o o

25

3 CU >

co 3

_o 'co 03

E 0)

«2 "3

3 = ■-

Pi

fa

o a x 0)

■3 3 4)

fa

O CO

a> a

:= 05

o CJ 3 o

25

3 cj

_o

•3 3

fa <

U3

C o

.-3 M

-3 cu

cu a c 3

r3 <D > o 3

in CU O ■-

3 O tn

bo C

'-£ en cu

-t->

to 3 O

'in CO

s cu

CU I ^

"ft E o o

_S

t* o o

25

c cu >

en C o

00 T—i

o cj 3 o

25

3 S- a>

cu fa

cu X. -t-> o

r3

CO 3 o

bb fa cu <

o o

25

cu t 3 3 CT

< -3 r-l

Iß 0)

3 o o !- a ü fa O

o a cu

Ö 3 3 o SH o

-*J c cu rrl 3 3 r3

CU -a

CU

E 3 3 .o

3 3 cr cu

3

u o

o 25

3 cu >

to C o

«

fa

o

^2 ,

Si — CM

fa <

cu CJ 3 3 Ü

•£ cu ^- "5 E o CJ 3 o

25

cu fa

s_ cu

X.

en 3 o

o CJ

3 o

25

en C

_o

'en CO

fa

3 IM CU

-3 a>

fa i. cu

H3

CO

C o

5 cu

3 3 o- CU

-3 3

_C

I- O o

25

3 cu >

^3

CO

C o

'55 en

,-^ cu 0J

o

cu 'S, E o o

_B

Si o o

25

o s- a U fa Ü

Si cu t 3 3 CT

■e o a CU u +J 3 cu E CU Si 3 CJ

0J

uo oo

ft 3 s


CO 05

c

• p*

fa chlo

roet

hyle

ne d

ry

clea

nin

g f

acil

itie

s

(AE

.75.

8);

No

cert

i-

fica

tion

for

ref

rig-

eran

t re

cove

ry

equip

men

t us

ed f

or

MV

AC

s (A

E.9

0.6)

1.

Inad

equat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and o

r-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa

-

per

wo

rk (

CR

.1.2

.R)

2.

Eff

ects

of under

tak-

ing o

n h

isto

ric

pro

per

ties

/ N

atio

nal

Reg

iste

r no

t ta

ken

into

acc

ount

(CR

.5.2

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

man

agem

ent

of a

r-

chae

olog

ical r

e-

sour

ces

(CR

.15.

2)

be d

• PH

a fa

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and

loc

al

reg

ula

tio

ns

(CR

.3.1

)

(i.e

., no

cu

ltu

ral

re-

sour

ces

stu

dy

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICR

MP (

CR

.5.1

.R)

3.

Inap

pro

pri

ate

man

-

agem

ent

of h

isto

ric

pro

per

ties

aff

ecte

d

by u

nder

takin

gs

(CR

.5.3

)

be &

S3

fa freo

n re

cove

ry.

(AE

.90.

1):

No

or i

n-

adeq

uat

e do

cum

en-

tati

on o

f se

rvic

ing

and a

mounts

of r

e-

frig

eran

t ad

ded

to

appli

ance

s.

(AE

.95.

2)

1. N

o or

inad

equat

e

his

tori

c pro

per

ties

surv

ey/N

atio

nal

Reg

iste

r.

(CR

.5.1

)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

regula

tion o

f the

ex-

cav

atio

n o

f ar

cheo

-

logi

cal

site

s.

(CR

.15.

1)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICR

MP

. (C

R.5

.1.R

);

Inap

pro

pri

ate

man

-

agem

ent

of h

isto

ric

pro

per

ties

aff

ecte

d

by u

nder

takin

gs.

(CR

.5.3

)

«5

be ti

C • PH

fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

his

tori

c pro

per

ties

surv

ey/N

atio

nal

Reg

iste

r.

(CR

.5.1

)

2.

Inap

pro

pri

ate

man

-

agem

ent

of h

isto

ric

pro

per

ties

aff

ecte

d

by u

nder

takin

gs.

(CR

.5.3

)

be

• pH

fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

his

tori

c p

rop

erti

es

surv

ey/N

atio

nal

Reg

iste

r.

(CR

.5.1

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

man

agem

ent

of a

r-

chae

olog

ical

re-

sour

ces.

(CR

.15.

2)

3.

Eff

ects

of u

nder

tak-

ing o

n his

tori

c

pro

per

ties

/Nat

ional

Reg

iste

r not

taken

into

acc

ount

.

(CR

.5.2

); S

HP

O n

ot

consu

lted

duri

ng

cult

ura

l re

sourc

es

Ü

0 H

Cu

ltu

ral

Res

ourc

es

Mgt

.

ERDCCERLTR-01-34

GO 05

£ be a

-8 a fa

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h oth

er F

eder

al

regula

tions

rega

rd-

ing

haz

ardous

ma-

teri

als

(HM

.2.1

)

2.

Inad

equat

e tr

ainin

g

for

haz

ardous

ma-

teri

als

pers

onne

l

(HM

.10.

2)

2.

Im

pro

per

sto

rage

of

com

pres

sed

gas

cyli

nder

s (H

M.4

5.1)

£ bfl

T3 C

• |H

1.

Lac

k of

or

inad

e-

quat

e M

SD

Ss

(HM

.1.2

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

wri

tten

haz

ardous

com

munic

atio

n

pro

gra

m (

HM

.10.

1)

3.

Inad

equat

e fl

am-

mab

le/c

om

bu

stib

le

stora

ge

room

s in

-

side

of b

uil

din

gs

(HM

.35.

6)

£ bo

a • FH

fa

1.

Lac

k of

or

inad

e-

quat

e M

SD

Ss.

(HM

.1.2

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

coor

dina

tion

wit

h

the

fire

dep

artm

ent.

(HM

.1.3

.R)

3.

Conta

iner

s of

haz

-

ardous

mat

eria

ls

are

not

corr

ectl

y la

-

bele

d, t

agged

or

mar

ked

. (H

M.1

.3)

£ be a

a fa

1.

Lac

k of

or

inad

e-

qu

ate

MS

DS

s

(HM

.1.2

)

2.

Conta

iner

s of

haz

-

ardous

mat

eria

ls

are

not

corr

ectl

y la

-

bele

d, t

agged

or

mar

ked

. (H

M.1

.3);

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

coor

dina

tion

wit

h

the

fire

dep

artm

ent.

(HM

.1.3

.R); I

nad

e-

qu

ate

house

kee

pin

g

in h

azar

dous

mat

e-

rial

s st

ora

ge

area

s;

(HM

.1.4

); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e w

ritt

en

haz

ardous

com

mu-

nic

atio

n p

rogr

am.

(HM

.10.

1);

Inad

e-

qu

ate

trai

nin

g f

or

haz

ardous

mat

eri-

als

per

son

nel

.

£ bfi

-0 c • FH

fa

co

« O

bo Ö

"S Ö

'S.

1.

Lac

k of

or

inad

e-

quat

e M

SD

Ss.

(HM

.1.2

)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

reg

ula

tio

ns.

(HM

.2.1

)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

coord

inat

ion w

ith

the

fire

dep

artm

ent.

(HM

.1.3

.R)

o H

Haz

ard

ou

s

Mat

eria

ls M

gt.


CO

c • IN

= • IN

fa

1.

Inad

equ

ate

or l

ack

of c

har

acte

riza

tio

n

of w

aste

s (H

W. 1

0.1)

2.

90 d

ay l

imit e

x-

ceed

ed o

n st

ora

ge

of

haz

was

te

(HW

.55.

1)

3.

Inad

equat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and

S

• IN

fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

inven

tory

of h

az-

ardous

was

te

(HW

.1.4

.R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

wri

tten

haz

ardous

was

te m

anag

emen

t

pla

n(H

W.1

.3.R

)

3.

Inad

equat

e m

an-

CO

bo a

c • IH

fa 1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

inven

tory

of h

az-

ardous

was

te.

(HW

.1.4

.R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

trai

nin

g r

ecor

ds.

(HW

.15.

3)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

wri

tten

haz

ardous

TWO d

*»N

•0 a fa (H

M.1

0.2)

; N

o or

inad

equ

ate

mat

eri-

als

for

spil

l cl

eanu

p.

(HM

.20.

1);

Inad

e-

quat

e fl

amm

able

/

com

bust

ible

sto

rage

cabin

ets.

(HM

.35.

5);

Inad

e-

quat

e fi

re p

rote

c-

tion f

or f

lam

mab

le/

com

bust

ible

sto

rag

e

area

s.

(HM

.35.

9);

Impro

per

sto

rage

of

com

pres

sed

gas

cyl

-

inder

s.

(HM

.45.

1)

1. N

o or

in

adeq

uat

e

inven

tory

of h

az-

ardous

was

te.

(HW

.1.4

.R); N

o or

inad

equ

ate

seco

n-

dar

y c

onta

inm

ent

in

haz

ard

ou

s w

aste

stora

ge

area

s.

(HW

.10.2

);In

ap-

W)

a fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

wri

tten

haz

ard

ou

s

was

te m

anag

emen

t

pla

n.

(HW

.1.3

.R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

inven

tory

of h

az-

ardous

was

te.

(HW

.1.4

.R)

3.

Inad

equ

ate

trai

nin

g

• pH

0 H

Haz

ardous

Was

te M

gt.

CO .05

be G

• PH

a fa

05

Ml Ö

•pH

-0 Ö

•M fa

a .2 ^

CO N

'S bo

o

■~-

a. CO a

o o z

c a;

ca 3 a"

ca C

a) ca

ca

CO 3 o — ca N ca

c o Z

CU CO

ca c ca

3

a> be a;

be .£ >,

u C ca

£ s *

— CD

<- -£„•-— CD

o fa

E. 4J

cu

en C o

o -a

o Z ~ S — -=" £

5 a. ca

3 PC

c

ca 3 a" o

ca c

CD

ca c

o o Z "be

3 o

-a

ca

be c '£ '3

o o z

o «2

DC

c '5

ca 3 cr cu

T3 ca c

— ^ = be 3 ca

• 3 a* ? w .3

V o cu I*

o en 3 o V s N ca

JS

o

C ca

+J .«

ca a o c o

o z

I» I«

bo c 3 3

1 •£ c3

c -u a) CO

S N

cu c ho ca ca to

■-. o

u CD P.

CN

ca

£.3 fa £

CO

lO I—I

-a cu C

50 .05

be a

a • PH

fa

s ..

S °* 0) CO bo _j ca *; c £ ca 2

CN cu to -U 1—1 ca KJ

3- ^ CU MH

ca 3

3 o ca o ft Z

bo 3

ca

«5 .05

be a

a

.05

be Ö

•i-<

ä • 1H fa

o

ca d a>

a. c? ca C o 00

>-, fa (!) o i—i

ca IT5 r en i-l

P. o ca £

.3 SH

o bo 3

"S "8 IH

a> 3 Ö o co s-, <u ^ P< <M

& Ü

CD 3 3 o co u cu p.

fa Q CO EH

«4H i-

00

be c

c fa

-£ c 3 s -s s 2 « 3 CO 3 u cd 3 cd

* 1 ^ co u .3 3 u O O cd ft

r—1

co t>

s B — 13 -U CD fi 13

O a; ft ü

CD -*-} cd 3 cr CO

-a a c SH

o o

55

r-1

CS CO

r-i

cs

PH

CS

1—1

G CO

e CO to cc c cd

£ CO

-G

o G o

'-Ö CO > SH CD CD

G O o

13 G cd

CD CO u 3 o CD CO

Si 3 ca a

o SH

-H3

C o u

Q O O

EH

CD

C 3

13 CD

u cd

+-> c o u CD

a

3 cd

CS 00 r-i

CS 55

o

o c CO

cd CD CD O

3 o CD CO

>> % cd 3 er CD

cd a CO s- cd

3 a. a 3 CO

O +J

X) CD bo cd C cd S

CD

E >> 3

£ CD

-4J

ft o CO

"3 0)

-S

c o

'to

o

C cd

X. r- CO

T3 G cd to c

+3 CD

«2 CO CD o S-

3 O CO CO SH

to

co 3 3 cd CO - -a

CD i—i CD CD

3 '>, _CD CD

ft 3 '+3 cd

^ •§ £ 5

>-. 'C 9- to §

CD °

fi ?. Id «

"Sb r-i ° (S

•2 g HO 6

CD ri CO

C '3 S CO

-tJ CS

3 a1

CO

SH >. Tl CD

05

bxi S

T3

a>

"ft s o u a u

1

CO u

"3 SH

3 -t-> Cd

C «4H o

s

o '-Ö cd

"3 CO SH

CD CO

SH

o o

55

r-i r-i

CD

C 3 o SH

be <H o CO

Ü

o

r-i Ö r-l

CO > SH

3 CD

CO

cd 3 er CO

c cd

T3 CO SH

CO bo S cd

Td

'u CO ft CO

13 CD

G CD

-t-J cd

rH

Ö CM

Ö

fa

o o

55

SH

3 o CD

CS 55

CS

.0 C cS C

CS 5 13 cd a

i-i CO

«4-1

o

CD SH CS

55

r-i

«0 u C Cd

13 s- CO

XS CO

fa

CO +-> c3 3

CD

SH O CO u z—V

c CO

s CO bo cd fi cd S c

I SH CD ft

4-3 o ö

c CO -(-> CO

'co

1

o u ä SH

<D 13 O

£

fi

T3 fi

co'

bo C

Ö

ft s o u Ö o

SH

CO

o

s

CO

1, rH

CM

13 ca a SH O

a cd

CO

'3

CD

C 3 o

(S r-i Ö

CS

CO

a o

cd SH CD

C o o

■a CO

B ■~

«2

cd C

_o '+3 cd >

_ft 'u C •c ft CD

CS t> Ö r-l

CS

fa 55 £ S 6 55 S SH

bo hJ ft O ^ CD

CO

CD

3 g r-i CN CM

«5 CD

Cd

CT CO

1

G a xt G

1

Cd CO u

■s CD CO

be 13 Cd

.G

SH

CO

«+H •n 'u ^^ o

5?

G cd

CO ft co

i—i

Ö CM

S3 o o

55 £ CO xs

CO CS fa 3

CD CO bo

G CO

r5

r-i

CO

as 3 cr CO

i

Ö a XS G

i

CS 0 SH

CO CO

■ CO

T3 cd Ö

OH*

CD

cd 3 er CD

«H o CO o

CS r-i ö

be XS cd G

•pH

CO

O

XI Ö cd

'u CO ft CD Ö

SH

O

CH

CS 55

CS co

13 cd a

SH

cd Ö CO

co 13

'd SH ei? Tl CN CO rH I* Ö '3 a

C rH

a o o

55 £ CO 13

CO p3 u cd CS o 3 CS

fa 3 CO

CO bo

Ö CO N»'

cd 3 er £ 55 fe 55

r-i CM' CN

ü CD

o, ,_ CO

0 cd SH

H 3 CS

55

3 o CD CO

03 ft S

110 ERDGCERLTR-01-34

CO

be c

-3 a

• PH

fa erat

ive

agre

emen

ts

do n

ot

stat

e th

at

the

DO

D w

ill

carr

y

out

its

obli

gati

ons

under

the

agre

e-

men

t to

the

exte

nt

that

fu

nd

ing i

s

avai

lab

le

(NR

.1.1

2.R

);N

oor

inad

equat

e tr

ain

ing

of la

w e

nfor

cem

ent

per

sonnel

(NR

.4.3

.R); N

o or

inad

equat

e E

ndan

-

gere

d S

peci

es M

an-

agem

ent

Pla

n

(NR

.20.

2.R

)

1.

In

adeq

uat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and

or-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa

-

perw

ork

(01.

1.2.

R)

TSC ti

ti • pH

fa

1.

E

nvir

onm

enta

l re

-

view

not

in

teg

rate

d

con

curr

entl

y w

ith

oth

er p

lannin

g a

nd

dec

isio

n-m

akin

g a

c-

tio

ns

(01.5

.2.R

)

be ti

• IN

ti fa

1.

Envir

onm

enta

l re

-

view

not

inte

gra

ted

into

pla

nnin

g a

nd

deci

sion

mak

ing.

(01

.5.2

. R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

copi

es o

f re

gula

-

ti -a ti

fa rs 55

be ti

ti • p*

fa

1.

NE

PA

no

t in

te-

gra

ted i

nto

pla

n-

ning

. (0

1.5

.1)

2.

En

vir

on

men

tal

re-

view

no

t in

tegra

ted

into

pla

nnin

g a

nd

dec

isio

n-m

akin

g.

Ü ft o

Oth

er E

nvi-

ronm

enta

l

Issu

es:

NE

PA


CXI

us S3

a

1.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

ICU

Z s

tud

y

(02.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

nois

e co

mp

lain

t

pro

cedure

(O2.

1.10

.R)

3.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

copi

es o

f en

viro

n-

tu d

(3

1.

No

or i

nco

mp

lete

ICU

Z s

tudy

(02

.1.3

.R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

nois

e co

mpla

int

pro

ced

ure

(02.1

.10.R

)

«0

be ö

C • iM

tion

s.

(Ol.

l.l.

R);

Inad

equ

ate

man

-

agem

ent

and o

r-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa

-

perw

ork.

(01

.1.2

.R);

NE

PA

imple

men

tati

on a

c-

tiv

itie

s no

t ex

e-

cute

d.

(01.

1.3.

R);

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

reg

ula

tio

ns.

(01.

2.1)

; E

A n

ot

prod

uced

wh

en r

e-

quir

ed.

(01.5

.2)

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

ICU

Z s

tudy

.

(02.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

nois

e co

mpla

int

proc

edur

e.

(O2.

1.10

.R)

3.

Inad

equat

e as

sess

-

men

t of

hel

ico

pte

r

»ft

be c

• 1-H

d •pH

1. N

onco

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

ula

tio

ns.

(02.3

.1)

(i.e

., no

ICU

Z s

tate

men

t)

bJD a

•i-i

(01.5

.2.R

)

3.

Cat

egori

cal

excl

u-

sion

s.

(01

.5.3

.R)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

ICU

Z s

tudy.

(02.1

.3.R

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

nois

e co

mp

lain

t

pro

cedure

.

(O2.

1.10

.R)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

asse

ssm

ent

of th

e

Ö

0 H

Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

Noi

se

CO

be c

Ö

fa men

tal

nois

e re

gu-

lati

on

s (0

2.1.

1.R

);

Inad

equat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and o

r-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa

-

perw

ork

(02.

1.2.

R);

No

atte

mpt

to

min

imiz

e en

viro

n-

men

tal

nois

e

(02.1

.7.R

);N

oor

inco

mpl

ete

oper

a-

tion

al d

ata

on n

oi.s

e

prod

ucin

g ac

tivit

ies

(02.

1.9.

R)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

IRP M

anag

emen

t

Pla

n a

nd a

n IR

P

Gui

danc

e an

d P

ro-

cedu

re M

anual

(03.

1.6.

R)

2.

Inad

equat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and o

r-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa

-

perw

ork

(03.

1.2.

R)

g a

• PH

-a e

fa

1.

Wh

en t

her

e is a

haz

ardous

sub-

stan

ce c

onta

min

ant

site

, w

hich

mig

ht

requir

e C

ER

CL

A

resp

onse

act

ion

s, a

rem

ov

al s

ite

eval

u-

atio

n i

s re

qu

ired

to

be d

one. (

03.1

.2)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

«0 S

bfi c • PH

a fa no

ise.

No

or i

nad

e-

quat

e o

per

atio

nal

dat

a m

ainta

ined

.

(02.

1.6.

R);

(02.

1.9.

R);

Non

-

com

plia

nce

wit

h

stat

e an

d l

ocal

regula

tions.

(02.3

.1)

(i.e

., in

ade-

quat

e IC

UZ s

tate

-

men

t)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

scre

enin

g f

or p

ast

use

of h

azar

do

us

subst

ance

s

(03.

1.3.

R)

2.

Inad

equat

e re

mo

val

site

eval

uat

ion.

(03.1

.2)

bo a

a fa

<:

if

be

a • PH

fa effe

ct o

f no

ise.

(02

.1.5

.R)

1. N

o or

inad

equat

e

scre

enin

g f

or p

ast

use

of h

azar

do

us

sub

stan

ces.

(03.1

.3.R

)

Ü

0 H

Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

IRP

CO

a • 1-4

Ö •rN

fa

1.

Inad

equat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and o

r-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa

-

per

work

(04

.1.2

.R);

No

or i

nad

equat

e

wri

tten

pol

luti

on

pla

n(0

4.1

.4.R

)

1.

No

or i

ncom

-

ple

te f

ile

of e

nvi-

a

Ö fa sc

reen

ing f

or p

ast

use

of haz

ardous

subst

ance

s

(03.

1.3.

R);

(03

.1.5

.R)

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

wri

tten

poll

uti

on

pla

n (

04

.1.4

.R)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

regula

tions

(04.3

.1)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e

mai

nte

nan

ce;

in-

adeq

uat

e er

osio

n

cont

rol)

; P

oll

uti

on

pre

ven

tion p

lan i

n-

adeq

uat

e or

inc

om-

ple

te (

04.5

.1)

1.

Inad

equat

e tr

ainin

g

for

envir

onm

enta

l

CO

S3

(3 •rH

fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

trai

nin

g i

n p

ollu

-

tion p

rev

enti

on

.

(04

.1.3

.R)

2.

No

or i

nco

mp

lete

mas

ter

list

ing o

f al

l

haz

ardous

sub-

stan

ces.

(O4.

10.1

.R)

3.

Inad

equat

e po

llu-

tion

pla

n.

(04.

1.4.

R)

1. I

nad

equ

ate

man

-

agem

ent

and o

r-

U5

be • PH

•PH

fa

1.

N

o or

inad

equat

e

wri

tten

po

llu

tio

n

pla

n.

(04

.1.4

.R)

<;

S g tiJO t3

(3 •pH

fa

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te

mas

ter

list

ing

of

all

haz

ard

ou

s su

b-

stan

ces.

(O4.

10.1

.R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

Haz

ard

ou

s W

aste

Min

imiz

atio

n P

ro-

gra

m.

(O4.

10.2

.R)

3.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

regula

tions.

(04.2

.1);

No

or i

n-

adeq

uat

e haz

ardous

was

te m

inim

izat

ion

pro

gra

m.

(04

.10

.2)

1. N

o or

in

com

ple

te

file

of

envi

ron-

•IH a 0 H

Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

P2

Oth

er E

nv.

Issu

es:

CO

lac C

b£ CD

"5 n

be

c

E CD

C

Q.

"o C O

-£> 3

CN

iri

o

CD 44» 3 3 cr CD

T3 3 3

£ CD

i—!

IC

O

CD

3 3 CT CD

-3 3 3

CD

'> u CD CO 3

3

1

CD CD

bC

< !- O o. a 3

£ i—i

i-H

in O

CD

3

3 a-

CD T3 3 3

3 o

4-J 3

'c

3 CD

C

S

3

CD

O ^4>

*^ 3 CD

3 4J

'p

E

p a.

"3

CD

o

oi ~

i CD

.3 ,3 -3

"3 CO

tc £

b£

'S • FN CD

P

3 p

en

ö

3 a* CD

+4>

CD 3 bo •_ o

o

CD a

o o

O o rv

o o

CD -u

CO

3 CD

o o

E E

3

£ a

£ 3 o

r^ "3 t. 3 3 .3 3

'-3 O

"C CD

3

CO

■5 «

g. id ■4->

3

'o to -*-} s 3 z w z 3 M CO £ z o O

u > CD p O 3

CD > s y

-3 o o

c CD

a 3 to

TI

CO

3 o

CD 44» a; 1

3

CO

3 _o

r* o ell 3 3

a. to a> ■£

3 S= t. 3 bfl CD •~

"3 -^ 3 CD

£

fee ö

to

"5 c c o CO •— CD

a

[>

O

ca 3 CT CU

a

4-3 CD

JO

c _o

3

C

co

o o CO <

3 -t-= CO a

+J u o a

(a 1-H

■>*

in O

o o

_S

o o z

> C CD

O

CD

s

£ i-i

O

CN CO

£ , 1 a be 3

«0

o

CM'

iri O

'S o o o

CD

3 CD <D

■5

3 CO

TJ 3 3

to 3

_o -+3" 3

G -3

CD

3 -u C CD

e 3 o i-

■> 3 CD

fee c

c

c o

'-£ 03 N

'S o

CB

3 O" cu

-a m

CD

3 O

GO

o o

3 CO

£ i-i

LO

4^" 3 3 cr CD

T3 m

"öS 3 3 o CO

£ i—!

io

to 3 be

CD a. 3

CN

3

3 § o p. O 3

CO

.2 CD O

i«

r to fee S3

• pH

T) ti •m

to

tan CO 3

-* C o 'S 3 CD

-44> C 3 3 S o

K fee c

• FH

ca

I cu S-.

-M c CO

T-J

3 SH

a> +J CB 3 cr

Ü CD

6 3 o s~

■>

% c c o

i-i

3 3 er CD

T3 3 a

CD CD

£ CD

■e

<D

s c o

3 W

CD

-u TJ 3 3 Si

O a 13 3 CD

s 3 o

pq i-i 00 in O

C 1-1 CD

-a 3 CD

t> u o o 0.

CD o

o w

ui ca 1-1 s-, iri o

z a CD

o a > CD

to £ y c CD

& a 3 J3 3 CO

3 CD to

CN CO

ti s

0< Fi 0 3

H o


00 s feJO Ö

• N

a fa st

affi

ng (

05.6

.l.R

);

No

or i

nad

equat

e

env

iro

nm

enta

l

trai

nin

g a

nd

awar

enes

s

(05.7

.2.R

);N

oor

inad

equat

e ev

alua

-

tion

of

envi

ron-

men

tal

trai

nin

g

nee

ds

(05.

7.3.

R);

No

or i

nad

equat

e

do

cum

enta

tio

n o

f

trai

nin

g (

05.7

.4.R

)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

tio

ns

(PM

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

in-

adeq

uat

e la

beli

ng;

no n

otif

icat

ion

of

serv

ice

cont

ract

s;

impro

per

sto

rage

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

revi

ew o

f pe

stic

ide

con

trac

ts

d • IN

d fa

1. N

o or

in

adeq

uat

e

man

agem

ent

of p

es-

tici

de r

egis

trat

ion

(PM

.1.2

); I

nst

alla

-

tion d

oes

no

t m

eet

mea

sure

s of

mer

it

(PM

.l.l

l.R

);

(PM

.45.

10.R

)

d -0 d

•r*

fa

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

revi

ew o

f pes

tici

de

contr

acts

.

(PM

.1.7

.R)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and

loc

al

regula

tions.

(PM

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

visi

-

ble

spil

l);

App

lica

-

tion

of re

stri

cted

use

pes

tici

des

by

«5

be d

d • PN

EM

1. N

o or

in

adeq

uat

e

revi

ew o

f pes

tici

de

con-

trac

ts.

(PM

.1.7

.R)

be d

d • IN

fa

1.

Pes

tici

de

appl

ica-

tors

are

no

t ce

rti-

fied

. (P

M.5

.1)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

man

agem

ent

of p

es-

tici

de

regis

trat

ion.

(PM

.1.2

)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

revi

ew o

f pes

tici

de

contr

acts

.

(PM

.1.7

.R)

o

0

Pes

tici

des

Mgt

.

116 ERDCCERLTR-01-34

00 s & bß S3

fa (PM

.1.7

.R)

3.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

file

of

pest

icid

e

reg

ula

tio

ns

(PM

.l.l

.R);

No

Pes

t

Man

agem

ent

Coo

r-

din

ator

(PM

.l.3

.R);

No

or i

nad

equat

e

Inst

alla

tion P

est

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n

(PM

.1.4

.R); I

nst

al-

lati

on d

oes

not

mee

t

mea

sure

s of

mer

it

(PM

.l.1

1.R

); A

ppli

-

cati

on o

f re

stri

cted

use

pes

tici

des

by

nonce

rtif

ied f

acil

ity

per

sonnel

(PM

.5.1

.R); P

esti

-

cide

sto

rage

/mis

s-

ing

faci

liti

es n

ot i

n-

clud

ed i

n S

PC

C

(PM

.45.

1.R

); I

nade

-

quat

e pe

stic

ide

stora

ge

faci

lity

bo a

a fa

CO

bo n

a fa no

n-ce

rtif

ied

faci

lity

pers

onne

l.

(PM

.5.1

)

3. A

ppli

cati

on o

f re-

stri

cted

use

pes

ti-

cide

s by

non

-

cert

ifie

d fa

cili

ty

pers

onne

l.

(PM

.5.1

.R)

«5

bo fl

'S a

fa

be d

'S c

fa

o • r-c OH 0 H


GO «75

toe C

C fa (P

M.4

5.4.

R); M

obil

e

equip

men

t is n

ot

thoro

ughly

dec

on-

tam

inat

ed a

nd i

s

not

labe

led

"CO

NT

AM

INA

TE

D

WIT

H

PE

ST

ICID

ES

"

(PM

.45.

5.R

); N

o or

inad

equat

e se

curi

ty

fenc

ing

(PM

.45.2

1.R

);N

oor

inad

equat

e si

gns

at

pest

icid

e m

anag

e-

men

t fa

cili

ty

(PM

.45.

26.R

); N

o or

sep

arat

e ven

tila

tion

syst

em

(PM

.45.

29.R

)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

tio

ns

(PO

.3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e

seco

ndar

y co

ntai

n-

tic Ö

•p*

• PH

fa

1. N

o or

inad

equat

e

SP

CC t

rain

ing

(PO

.5.7

); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e sp

ill

con-

tain

men

t an

d

«0

tic (3

•PN

a fa

1. L

ack

of o

r in

ade-

quat

e sp

ill

con-

tain

men

t an

d

clea

nup m

ater

ials

.

(PO

.20.

1)

tifi c

c •PN

fa

1. N

onco

mpl

ianc

e w

ith

stat

e an

d l

ocal

reg

u-

lati

on

s.

(PO

.3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e

was

hra

ck)

; Inad

e-

tic ö •»*

a fa

1.

No

copy

of

SP

CC

.

(PO

.5.1

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

SP

CC

tra

inin

g.

(PO

.5.7

)

0 H

to

O PH

118

CO .05

be c

• PH

d

CD .05

b£

a fa

«5 .05

bx d

• IN

d

•IH

PH o

« cu

.CD "p a.

CD C

'S c AC 3 CO

a cu CO

O OH

CD CO C O a en .—

-a CD

T3 C3

c o

•Q

O cu

a 3 a-

cu -O 3 c

c 01 £ c

a E a. 3 c CO CD

Z j ^ .S -*

Q -£ ^ 1—4 c ■—> Cd O ,- CO ° 3 P 5 i:

1^ 3 +J ^-^ 05 3 tfj

£ CD 3 O" CO

3 CU LO

be d

fc ^H 3

c O

•p* 3 ö '*-" -0 d

fa

C

CU d a.

o o

55

CU Ü CO

cu o CO

CC 3 a* <D

-Ö CO c

CO

IO

d Cu

0)

CO

a* w' T3 O 2 Cu

bo AC -S c a £ .2

o o

55

cu o CO

CO

CO 3 cr

co a

c 01 > o> •- a

CD en c o a.

en T3

• r* CO

IO

d cu

CD J3

CO

'> 4) S-,

PS IN io

O Cu

o> ü to Ü

CU CO

CO 3 cr 0)

X) CO G

f~ o o

55

bo C

t> Ü IO Ü CU CO

O PH

Ö o> £ a) bo CO c CO

C CO s-

T3 01 tn 3

CO e. rt *-*-s

IO CO

d Q Cd CO

o o

C o

Sn CD

CO

io' CXI

cu r^ XI d r/i be

c ,0 cfl

o en

PH

!H

4)

o a

en en

i O

CD C '« H-»

C CO

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

T3 o rt< -fc-a 0)

s T3 s_

<n CO c 0)

be

3 cr CD

cfl c

01

CO

of 3

CO

0) > o CJ

a

'S '3 er

o 3

O •- T-H

•rt •^ .o ■ ■ a o H3 d

S-H

o o

Ö CO

01 en Cfl

S 3

co

d fa 55 a

V u ^ 0) PH

i« c 41 o

S T3 0)

ClH

b£ CD

en r;

CD -t~) en CO

o u C o

55 a o o E= -C -o

-t-> o o CO o oi c n

3 be be d

55 ^ <D •— _c C/J

c o

cfl a

be c

d a c o

55

3 cj o

0)

en E 3 SH

be o t. a

Ct- o

io CO CN a

d g 5S I

CN

C O

3 a

be c o >>

-3 ,^ Ctf

3 a c o

55

3 IO J-. CN be _• p O a S

CM

c bo "- c c ~ o o

+J >> 3 <I) a - o 3

-4-> IH n 3 a (1) 3 +J

O 3 55 en

IO CN

d CO

en E 3

o a

c o

3 a

t- 3 a c o

55

be _C

u o>

"cfl CJ O

01

cn .

E 1 3 *0

2 ° a 5S

CN

en 3

CO

a 'S d

•PH

fa pli

ance

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

-

tions

(SO

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

over

flow

ing

dum

p-

ster

; im

pro

per

man

agem

ent

of

regula

ted m

edic

al

was

te)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

trai

nin

g o

f per

sons

han

dli

ng o

r m

anag

-

ing s

olid

was

te

(S0.

1.4.

R); N

onpa

r-

tici

pat

ion i

n

stat

e/lo

cal

recy

clin

g

pro

gra

ms

(S0.2

5.1

.R);

Open

dum

pin

g i

s pr

ac-

tice

d at

the

faci

lity

(SO

.35.

20)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h st

ate

and l

ocal

regula

tions

(ST

.3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e

feJD d'

d • lH

fa stat

e/lo

cal

recy

clin

g

pro

gra

ms

(SO

.25.

1)

3.

In

adeq

uat

e so

lid

was

te s

tora

ge

(SO

.10.1

.R);

Noor

inad

equat

e m

ark-

ings

on

food

was

te

conta

iner

s

(SO

.10.

4.R

)

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

US

T r

emov

al

(ST

.95.

1.R

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

bo d

d • IM

fa sonn

el n

ot

peri

odi-

call

y in

form

ed

about

mat

eria

ls

proh

ibit

ed f

rom

disp

osal

.

(SO

.10.

3.R

)

2. I

nad

equat

e m

ark

-

ings

of f

ood

was

te

conta

iner

s.

(SO

.10.

4.R

)

1.

Inad

equat

e

spil

l/ov

erfi

ll p

rote

c-

tion

for

su

bst

an-

dar

d U

ST

s.

be d

d fa

<: 55

be d

• PM

d •r* fa so

nnel

are

no

t pe

ri-

odic

ally

info

rmed

about

pro

hib

ited

mat

eria

ls.

(SO

.10.

3.R

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

insp

ecti

ons

of in

-

du

stri

al s

hop

was

te

rece

pta

cles

.

(SO

.10.

2.R

)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

mar

kin

gs

on f

ood

was

te c

onta

iner

s.

(SO

.10.

4.R

)

1.

Inad

equat

e U

ST

clos

ure.

(ST

.95.

3);

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

0 H

Sto

rag

e T

anks

Mgt

.

CO

be a

a •** tr

ainin

g;

inad

e-

qu

ate

seco

ndar

y

conta

inm

ent; i

n-

adeq

uat

e le

ak d

e-

tect

ion)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

seco

ndar

y co

ntai

n-

men

t fo

r bu

lk s

tor-

age

tan

ks

(ST

.f).

l)

<

be ö

C

reco

rdkee

pin

g r

e-

gar

din

g U

ST

s

(ST

.90.

2)

3.

S

ubst

andar

d U

ST

s

not

upgra

ded

,

clos

ed,

or r

emov

ed

(ST

.25.

1)

1.

No

ML m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B e

quip

men

t

(Tl.

10.2

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

PC

B i

nven

tory

(Tl.

10.1

)

3.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

tio

ns

(Tl.

3.1

)

(i.e

., in

adeq

uat

e

PC

B m

anag

emen

t);

No

or i

nad

equat

e

50

be a

C

(ST

.30.

1.R

)

2.

Inad

equat

e U

ST

clos

ure.

(ST

.95.

3)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

US

T r

emov

al.

(ST

.95.

1.R

)

1.

No

ML

mar

kin

gs

for

PC

B e

qu

ipm

ent.

(Tl.

10.2

)

2.

No

PC

B i

nven

tory

.

(Tl.

10.1

)

3.

No

US

EP

A id

enti

fi-

cati

on n

um

ber

.

(Tl.

10.3

); I

nad

e-

quat

e st

ora

ge

of

com

bust

ible

mat

e-

rial

s by

PC

B t

rans-

form

er.

(Tl.

20

.4)

be a

a •IH

1. N

o M

L m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B e

quip

men

t.

(Tl.

10

.2)

be a

a

reg

ula

tio

ns.

(ST

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

unre

g-

iste

red s

tora

ge

tan

ks;

inad

equat

e

seco

ndar

y c

on

tain

-

men

t)

2.

Subst

andar

d U

ST

s

no

t upgra

ded

,

clos

ed,

or r

emov

ed.

(ST

.25.

1);

Inad

e-

quat

e A

ST

for

use

d

oil.

(ST

.125

.1)

1.

No

ML m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B e

qu

ipm

ent.

(Tl.

10.2

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

insp

ecti

ons

of P

CB

tran

sfo

rmer

s (>

500

ppm

).

(Tl.

20.7

)

U ft 0 H

Tox

ic

Subst

ance

s,

PC

B


00

• PH

S3 • PH

1.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

Inst

alla

tio

n A

sbes

-

tos

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n (

T2.

1.4.

R)

2.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

asbes

tos

surv

ey

(T2.

1.3.

R);

(T2.

2.3)

;

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h no

tifi

cati

on

requii

'em

ents

for

faci

liti

es t

hat

de-

mol

ish

stru

ctu

res

(T2.

5.1)

1.

Rad

on m

easu

re-

men

ts n

ot b

eing

done

acc

ordi

ng t

o

sche

dule

(T

3.1.

3.R

);

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

annual

rep

ort

s ar

e

bein

g su

bm

itte

d

IM S3

S3 • PH

dis

posa

l of

min

eral

oil

die

lect

ric

fluid

(Tl.

50.4

)

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te

Inst

alla

tion

Asb

es-

tos

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n(T

2.1

.4.R

)

2.

No

or i

nco

mple

te

asbes

tos

surv

ey

(T2.

1.3.

R)

3.

Asb

esto

s ac

tions

wit

h t

he

po

ten

tial

to g

ener

ate

fug

itiv

e

emis

sions

not

envi

-

ronm

enta

lly a

s-

sess

ed (

T2.

1.5.

R)

1.

Inco

mple

te r

ado

n

mea

sure

men

ts

(T3.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

wri

tten

rad

on p

olic

y

(T3.1

.14.R

);N

oor

inad

equ

ate

dat

a-

«0

g S3

• PH

S3 •PH

1.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e

asbes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

Inst

alla

tion

Asb

es-

tos

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n.

(T2.

1.4.

R)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

pro

tect

ive

equi

p-

men

t fo

r as

bes

tos

per

sonnel

.

(T2.

1.7.

R)

1.

Rad

on m

easu

re-

men

ts n

ot

per-

form

ed.

(T2.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or

inad

equat

e

mit

igat

ion o

f st

ruc-

ture

s.

(T2.

1.12

.R)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

US

S3

S3

1. N

o or

inco

mple

te

asbes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

R)

1

too S3

-0 S3

•PH

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

asbes

tos

surv

ey.

(T2.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or

inad

equ

ate

Inst

alla

tio

n A

sbes

-

tos

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n.

(T2.

1.4.

R)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

pro

tect

ive

equi

p-

men

t fo

r as

bes

tos

per

sonnel

.

(T2.

1.7.

R)

1.

Inco

mple

te r

adon

mea

sure

men

ts.

(T3.

1.3.

R)

2.

No

or

inad

equ

ate

mea

sure

men

t of

Pri

ori

ty 1

str

uc-

ture

s.

(T3.

1.4.

R)

•i-i a 0 H

Tox

ic S

ub-

stan

ces,

As-

bes

tos

Tox

ic S

ub-

stan

ces,

Ra-

don

CO 05

bfi c

•PN

• pH

fa (T3.

1.15

.R); N

on-

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egu-

lati

on

s re

gar

din

g

radon (

T3.

2.1)

1.

N

onco

mpl

ianc

e

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

regula

tions

rega

rd-

ing L

BP (

T4.

2.1)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h st

ate

and

loca

l

regula

tions

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

uii-

per

mit

ted d

is-

char

ge;

inad

equ

ate

reco

rdke

epin

g)

2.

Inad

equ

ate

anal

yti

-

cal

and s

amp

lin

g

met

hods

(WA

. 10.

5);

Dis

char

ges

that

wou

ld c

ause

pas

s

thro

ugh o

r in

terf

er-

05

be G

• PH

C • PH

fa

CO

1—i

CO EH

cu CO ca

1.

N

onco

mpli

ance

wit

h s

tate

an

d l

ocal

regula

tions

(T4.

3.1)

1.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

surv

eill

ance

of

storm

wat

er d

is-

char

ge

(WA

. 10.

4)

2.

Dis

char

ges

th

at

wou

ld c

ause

pas

s

thro

ug

h o

r in

terf

er-

ence

at

the

PO

TW

/FO

TW

(WA

.25.

1)

3.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

regula

tions

50

bl) c

• PN

• P*

fa long

-ter

m m

eas-

ure

men

t of

Pri

ori

ty

2 an

d 3

str

uct

ure

s.

(T3.

1.6.

R)

<;

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

surv

eill

ance

of

storm

wat

er d

is-

char

ge.

(WA

.10.

4)

2.

Intr

od

uct

ion o

f po

l-

luta

nts

in

to

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

2)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

syst

em f

or i

nves

ti-

gati

on w

ater

pol

lu-

tion

com

pla

ints

(WA

.1.3

.R);

Dis

-

be d

• PH

a fa

< fc 1.

In

adeq

uat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and o

rgan

i-

zati

on o

f pap

erw

ork

.

(WA

.1.2

.R); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e sy

stem

for

inves

tigat

ion w

ater

poll

utio

n co

mpla

ints

.

(WA

.1.3

.R);

Non

com

-

pli

ance

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

-

tions.

(WA

.3.1

); N

o

or i

nad

equat

e su

r-

veil

lanc

e of

sto

rmw

a-

bfi a

a •P*

fa

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

pre

par

atio

n a

nd

subm

issi

on o

f an

-

nu

al r

epo

rts.

(T3.

1.15

.R)

1. N

on

com

pli

ance

wit

h s

tate

an

d l

ocal

regula

tions.

(T4.

3.1)

(i.e

., p

ain

t

chip

ped

)

1.

No

or

inad

equ

ate

surv

eill

ance

of

storm

wat

er d

is-

char

ge.

(WA

.10.

4)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

syst

em f

or i

nves

ti-

gat

ion w

ater

pol

lu-

tio

n c

om

pla

ints

(WA

.1.3

.R)

3.

Intr

oduct

ion o

f pol

-

luta

nts

in

to

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

2)

u •F*

o H

Tox

ic S

ub-

stan

ces,

LB

P

cu ca

cu CO ca

CO

&

Ö

a fa en

ce a

t th

e

PO

TW

/FO

TW

(WA

.25.

1);

Intr

o-

duct

ion

of p

ollu

t-

ants

int

o

PO

TW

/FO

TW

(WA

.25.

2)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

tio

ns

(WQ

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

no

cros

s co

nnec

tion

cont

rol

prog

ram

;

inad

equat

e re

cord

-

keep

ing;

unc

erti

fied

oper

ator; i

nade

-

quat

e m

onit

orin

g)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

Wat

er R

esou

rces

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n

(WQ

.1.8

.R)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

reco

rds

of a

ctio

ns

tt) c

• PH

S fa (W

A.3

.1)

(i.e

., im

-

pro

per

fil

ling o

f

wet

land;

oil

/wat

er

sep

arat

or

mal

func-

tion

ing)

; In

troduc-

tion

of poll

uta

nts

into

PO

TW

/FO

TW

(WA

.25.

2)

1.

Inad

equat

e m

an-

agem

ent

and o

r-

gan

izat

ion o

f pa-

per

work

(WQ

.1.2

.R); N

o or

inad

equat

e su

rvei

l-

lance

of

publ

ic w

a-

ter

syst

ems

(WQ

.10.

2)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

reco

rds

of a

ctio

ns

taken

to

corr

ect

or

repai

r th

e dis

trib

u-

tion

syst

em

(WQ

.1.3

.R); N

on-

com

plia

nce

wit

h

«0

a

S •i-i fa ch

arges

that

wou

ld

caus

e pas

s th

rough

or i

nte

rfer

ence

at

the

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

1)

1. N

onco

mpl

ianc

e

wit

h s

tate

an

d l

ocal

reg

ula

tio

ns.

(WQ

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

no

cros

s co

nnec

tion

cont

rol

pro

gra

m;

viol

atio

n of

loca

l

plu

mb

ing c

ode)

1. L

ead

use

d i

n pi

pe,

sold

er,

or f

lux.

(WQ

.25.

1)

«5

be a

Ö • PH

fa ter

dis

char

ge.

(WA

. 10.

4);

Dis

-

char

ges

that

wou

ld

caus

e pas

s th

rough

or i

nte

rfer

ence

at

the

PO

TW

/FO

TW

.

(WA

.25.

1)

< fc

c "0 a fa

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and

loc

al

reg

ula

tio

ns.

(WQ

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

no

back

flow

pre

ven

-

tion

; in

adeq

uat

e

sam

pli

ng)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e

mo

nit

ori

ng o

f lea

d

and c

oppe

r.

(WQ

.50.

6);

No

or

inad

equat

e m

oni-

tori

ng o

f lea

d a

nd

copp

er.

(WQ

.78.

6)

0 H

Wat

er Q

ual

ity


CO

be c

-Ö Ö

•m fa ta

ken

to

corr

ect

or

rep

air

the

dis

trib

u-

tion s

yste

m

(WQ

.1.3

.R);

Noor

inad

equat

e w

ater

supp

ly d

istr

ibu

tio

n

syst

em m

aps

(WQ

. 1.4

.R); N

on-

com

plia

nce

wit

h

oth

er F

eder

al r

egu-

lati

on

s re

gar

din

g

wat

er q

ual

ity

(WQ

.2.1

; N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e pr

ogra

m

to r

educ

e ex

posu

re

of le

ad t

o ch

ildr

en

(WQ

.25.

1.R

)

be a

• PH

a fa st

ate

and l

ocal

regula

tions

(WQ

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

no

back

flow

pre

ven

-

tion

)

CO

be a

a fa

10

be ä

•PH

fa

be a

d fa

u •H

0 H

a

d

SH

01

1 3 > .2 O CB

^2 a) & s-

a>

fa

EC C o CO co

Ö _o 'co cn

I s? +J :

cr CÜ

T3 CB c

fa

o

© a CD

£ .S

<D -H3 SH

CB

cr

o o

SH o o

S5

SH

o a CD •- Ö 01

CD SH

o o SH

a O fa u

Pi

in oo

CD +J cB

cr o> -o CO

C •- o o

CO

Ö o

a) > SH

3 0}

0) a o

ft

3

P 5 m PH

o SH

a; CO

•Q cu

PH

"a o

SH

o o

3 bjo

SH

co a> u SH

3 O CO 0) SH

13 SH

3

OH

PH

o>

o

SH

a bo 0) SH

CO

CO Cu u SH

a;

c 3

SH

a o -

o

SH

01 -U CO

in

PH

O 3 o o ^ C '■+3

CO

u CO 01

CO -HS

SH

o o>

PH 3 o

c _cB

CD

SH

13 SH

3

tu GH

fa CO

H3 13 e

u as n a SH C -H3

S 73 TH o be C

-3

m C

o

C n

SH

CU T3

01 fa

3 o bo

CN

PH 5

CO CD

+3

C 01

£ _C o cB -H= -tn»

CN CO

d 'S d

c? o

-H>

c CD >

CO

a o

CD CO

2 fa cr <

bo g 'o bo Ö o

CH o CO

3

C CD SH SH

3 Ü

a 01

u -Ö SH <t> y, c a CD £ SH

o CB

CD CO

■U

c 01

O Ö

S CO

Ö 01 SH

(j

bo u CB CO

o

as o Ü

SH O CB

SH

3 i 1 -H>

PH a>

co CD CJ SH

3 o CO CD SH

■so«

■c o -H2 CO

PH )S

cB S O

CD

co 2 o cr S CD

TJ CB e

CB

ä -9

3 CO

CO CD

'■S cu ft o SH

O

SH

CD

CO

'So

ft PH

CN

«3J

d • IN

d

o

<N

"&

co C o

fa

-a to CD o SH

3 O CO CD

PH

13 3

-H> r-H 3 O

CO 05

S fa

3 3 a-

CU "3 3 C

4* o 3

E CO

CO Q co

o , co CO

n 1

be m 01 -t-" CO £ 'C "P 3 O s o

o a CD

CO 3 3 o Tl 0) C e CD ^^ 3 "o 0) 3

S- CO 2

be X) 3 1 ' CO

IT CT a; £0 c CU 43

CO ^ 3 42 F

I—1 "3 3 43 s

s u m 3 E s- rC o CO ^ 5 o -rt o ^ o n c o C

CO

CU

3 K o E

CN co

z 53 CU bo S

CD 3 c £

CU

CD

,~ aj S 6 CO CD

CO CO

0/ CO CU

3 CU

en o •~ ■Ji cr 3

E is ^H

 -a O 0=_ Ti en c 3

-t-> P* r$ -a 3 3 CO E c. — ■* c o 3

o o

03 N 3

43 H- o

t—1 •- o O

T5 SH

CS N a

43

a c CU

£

CD

CO

C

c

'■5 CO 3

.05

a

0

SH

a> 43 O

43

T3 SH

CO

bo CD s_ co c o

2 a

C o

CU SH

"co SH

CD T3

CD fa

CO

3 o

% - CO CM

3°E

CD

CO 3 CT /-N CD CM

CO .s s E

CO CO a CO

SH

o

4> o c CD > c

CO 3 cr CD

-3 CO

3

o o

CO CO

£ CO

3 o

"3 SH

CO N CO

43

T-i

E

c CU

*H

CD

CO

3 cr CD

CO c u> o o

25

CD bD 3 C 3

co 3

CO

3 o IH 3 N 3

45

1 o c 3

HH LH 3

« 4= o

CO o co CU

TH tl co

^ ü 3

3

K ^~

3 3

O

CU

o 3 o

T-H

a 3 3 3 T-H

3 CD

P

a1

CD T3 •c

CU X

Oi

a • pH

fa

o

in CO

42 3

3

3 3 cr cu

3 3

r3

o

ffi .ts * .2

3 bo cu u CO

3 O

43 3 ä

CD u a u

CD 6 "cO bo o L. 3 u <1) SM (-J Tt o o CO fc fa

CO

3 o

3 CN

3°E

-u O 3 \Z cr AC cu (M

'S -H .S S a

(M

Si o

tu o

CJ 3

CO

CO

CO O CO

3 _o +3 3 C

-3 o o CJ

3 3 cr cu

3

3

| 'S B 3

3 M

« as

3 42

o

CD ^ "3 CC

'« >n

IM

CD

43

CO

X

42 3

E 3 C

o o

CD bo 3 s- o CO

CO b£ 3

3 42

C CD

3 3 cr

3 3

O

o

I CD bo crt

O o .3 'C CD

3

E

CD SH

3 co CD

3 3 F co'

o c

U o SH a £

CD

CO

c 3

> CD

CO £ o

3

3

£ 3 o

3

CO

3 o

CD

3 3 a* 4)

3 & CO

3 o

< CD SH

3 CO CD

3 43

>>

u 3

-3 O SH

P- -a a. T) -a 3 In . 3 s- 3

o < CD

3 N c 3 3

N £ 3 *-> CO

3 43 E In

o 3

43 5 CD SH

C CO

ft

co

[3 'SH

CD

3

co 3 o

T3 SH

3 N 3 K

ft

co 3

co 3 o

-3 SH

3 N 3 X


CO

C

d

1.

No

or i

nad

equat

e N

atu

ral

Res

ou

rces

Man

agem

ent

Pla

n(N

R.1

.5.R

)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e gro

und

mai

nte

nan

ce (

NR

.lO

.l.R

)

3.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

surv

ey o

f

endan

ger

ed a

nd t

hre

aten

ed

spec

ies

(NR

.20.

1)

d

d • PH

1. C

urr

ent

stat

us

of o

ngoi

ng

agre

emen

ts o

r en

forc

emen

t

acti

ons

not

exam

ined

(NR

.1.1

); N

o or

in

com

ple

te

file

of n

atu

ral

reso

urc

es

regula

tions

(NR

.l.l

.R);

Nat

ura

l re

sourc

es a

re n

ot

or a

re i

nad

equat

ely m

an-

aged

to

sup

po

rt t

he

mil

itar

y

mis

sion

whi

le a

lso

pro

tect

-

ing

and e

nh

anci

ng r

e-

sour

ces

for

mu

ltip

le u

se,

sust

ain

able

yie

ld,

and b

io-

logi

cal

inte

gri

ty (

NR

.1.9

.R);

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

reg

ula

tions

regar

d-

ing

nat

ura

l re

sourc

es

(NR

.2.1

) d

d •IN

(HW

.1.5

.R); N

o or

ina

de-

quat

e re

po

rt o

n H

AZ

MIN

effo

rts

(HW

.1.6

.R); I

nad

e-

quat

e co

nta

iner

s fo

r st

ori

ng

haz

ard

ou

s w

aste

(H

W.3

0.2)

1

0. 0 H

CG CU U

O co CD

K "öS

03

i CO

bo c 'S

K £ T—i

bo CO

PH

2 to a)

+J _e CD

CO

c J3 "a o

CO

ß o

'55 _3 "u

Q.

a. a

to

SI D a

CD

O £

CD en

'o ß CD

2

CD 1-

3 T3

CD O

"o _CD

CD

CD

T-i

CN o CO

fi o

CD CD

CJ CO

CD

jfi

£ CO

CO

_CD

CD

CD w ^ a < a CO 3 O s '-D 3 "S Q a Ö 0 OH — ß T-H CD ft ^-v e c3 CD CD S

o CJ

T3

C C*H

£ oci

Cu cj

3 CO

u r^ S CJ O

T3 Ctj

c ß

Pi Ö T-H

o

C

3 to: CD SH

-a

c

CO

CO

CO CD CJ

C

fa O

o

o c o

'-0 O

be cu a O

CN

o o o 2

CO

"o u o o

T-i

>> T3 3 CO

1- O

O

s s o CJ

T-i

oq O

O

o

CO

CD CO

'3 c

o o

r*3

a

._3 en

CO

3 o

CN

a

r ca S- bo CD

0)

§• CD

bo fi '3 c

'S O

ß

£

s o ej e SH

o o 2

1 m

< PH

<*-

c CD

s- 3 a

£ r-H

5: bO c '3 bo c

C3

—> C a s CD p .5 "5

1-H

t—<

O -c

CD

ß

s ca X

N

o 1—1

CD +n C3 3 O" CD

Pi CO

1-5

CD CO

'o ß CD

Cfl

3 cr CD

CD '- 3

13 CD o O u a

o CD

T—<

CD

CD

S E o CJ

_ß

CO

C _© *4H ca

CD CJ

fi _C0

s £ o o c o 2

C8

1 CD

13 s- CD

T3 CD

&H

CD to

'o C bo C

-3

bo c 'c

CD CD u CJ CO

CD 4-> cS 3 cr CD

en

3 o

-a

a N ca

"o CD

£ CO

T-i

CO

o

PH

"o CD

s CD

S 6 o CJ

•IN

(3 oq

o <n

t—<

«3

T-H

T—1

g o

"o CO

CD

S- O

CO

CD

o ß

-a ca O

T3 C3

_ß fi £

Ö T-H

1 CD 1-,

£ T—i

CD

-C o

,fi

JH ca bo ^ H ^1

c CO

3

CO

eo CD CJ

C ca

fa o o

o ß

_o r-i o

0) -4-> 0) s

CO

ß o 4J

3 a CO

C CD

s

CO

ß o

■-

o o 2

>. 3 CO

o o 2

"a, 6 o u

T-i

<M'

O o o 2

CD CO

'3 c

T-i

O

en CM

C CN

•B S o o

ca sx

a CO

X! 3 eo

o o

2;

T-i i-H <N CO T-H oi

N Ö

1-H o HH

CD

Cfl £ M 3

a" CO

fl CD T-i

C3 c4 ß O

■^ N—^

fa

< £

o o

T-I

>> T3 3 CO

< 2

CO ID 3 CO CO M

CD en

PH

• PH

o 2 Pi

F-H

& C CD in en

0 s Ö o SH

'> fi H

SH

CO

CD

3 CO CO

> fi w

CD

CD

3 CO en

F-H

> c w u CD

o £ o o


CO

be a

a •IM

reg

ula

tio

ns

(03.1

.l.R

)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e pre

lim

i-

nar

y a

sses

smen

t an

d r

eme-

dia

l si

te i

nv

esti

gat

ion

(03.1

.5)

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te m

aste

r

list

ing o

f al

l haz

ardous

sub

stan

ces

(04.1

0.l

.R)

2.

Inad

equ

ate

man

agem

ent

and o

rgan

izat

ion o

f pa

per-

wor

k (0

4.1

.2.R

)

1.

No

or i

nco

mple

te f

ile

of e

n-

vir

onm

enta

l re

gula

tions

(05

.1.1

.R)

2.

Inad

equat

e en

vir

onm

enta

l

trai

nin

g (

05.7

.l.R

)

3.

The

EP

R-M

rep

ort a

nd

be d

d

regula

tions

(03

.1. l

.R)

3. C

urr

ent

stat

us

of o

ngoi

ng

agre

emen

ts o

r en

forc

emen

t

acti

ons

not

exam

ined

(03.1

.1)

1.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e m

aste

r

list

ing

of

all

haz

ardous

subst

ance

s (0

4.10

. l.R

)

2.

Inad

equat

e m

anag

emen

t

and o

rgan

izat

ion o

f pap

er-

wor

k (0

4.1.

2.R

)

3.

Pro

cure

d p

roduct

s not

mad

e fr

om r

ecov

ered

sol

id

was

te (

04.1

.5.R

); N

o or

in-

adeq

uat

e H

azar

dou

s W

aste

Min

imiz

atio

n P

rogra

m

(O4.

10.2

.R)

1.

Inad

equ

ate

trai

nin

g f

or e

n-

vir

onm

enta

l per

sonnel

(05.

7.1.

R)

2.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e fi

le o

f en

-

vir

onm

enta

l re

gula

tions

(05.1

.l.R

)

pH

be d •**

d

1.

Inad

equ

ate

man

agem

ent

and o

rgan

izat

ion o

f pap

er-

wor

k (0

4.1

.2.R

)

2.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e m

aste

r

list

ing o

f al

l h

azar

do

us

sub

stan

ces

(04.1

0.l

.R)

1.

No

or i

ncom

plet

e fi

le o

f en-

vir

onm

enta

l re

gula

tions

(05

.1.1

.R)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

reg

ula

tions

regar

d-

ing

pro

gra

m m

gt.

(05.

2.1)

;

o p. 0 H

CM eu co CD

CO CO

)—1

>' C

u CD

o

s a cd bo o '«

PH

cö CD

CO co

i—i

>' Ö w

SH

CD

X, o

CO 05

tu a

a

en en CD o o -a

-U) CO i- o a. s* o

c

cB be be

OH C

bo C '2 C

"p. >■>

s <

CD

-Ö 3

c ca

be c

d i—t

ui O

c o c

CO

-a

o en ;- cu a.

Q O Q

i

c o

c o CO I.

CD O 13 a

© en

en Xi

XI CO cu cp .S

a a <

a. a < CO >•

K ca 7-1 U CD m IM £3 in o o s £ a uu

(M

.05

be a

'S d

.05

d

'S d

IM CD

N3

CD u C C3

C o

C CD SH a be C

ca IM

ca 3 cr CD xi ca e

o

CD

c Ö O en SH CD

cp ca

CD s Ö o IN

MM

o

- o

o o C

o c CD IM C3

b£ C '2 Ö ca "a

e IM

< o

X5 CD

CO !N

CD be

XI 3

-Q

XI C ca

be c 6 E be o

PS

d

O

be c

CD

'> CD

ca 3 a* CD

X) ca c

o o 2

o C

>> C H->

x! o m IN CD en CD CD +J i

CD a Q O Q

+J X) a

en o ce SH

M-J

U

'E MJ en a> In

o

u o c >»

MQ

en

CB

"a a <

+3 en CD

P. <1>

'o .2 T-H

iri C CD ri en x) o ^_^ C X) o rH 3 CD

c c o CO

CD

'G '-£

en CD O.

<X

rH

OH

CB u

"a a

<:

CJ

en CD

a CD en 3

e X)

CD

«

CD U

lO

s 0M

1—.

CD c

xi CD

Ü

■c M-> en CD IN

«M

CD O i

C o c

< 2

ft s

en CD

X)

en CD

MM

Ö • PH

Ö • PH

bo Ö

• PH

Ö

O OH

o o CO

>> a. o o o

55

s. s .o cö

cd ^Q

a 2 *J cö 3 er CD

-a cö 3

o o

T3 CD

3 ^J JH W O SH

+J O CD ft co

Tl O UH 3

er CO

bo 3

cö

ü co

u 3 O SH ft

2 #

o

O CU

(M

C o

CO

CD

a 3 O" CU

TJ CÖ

.3

SH o o

55

a 3 c cö

-2 "3 T3 C CÖ

-4-3 s CD

o CU

Ö cö

~ n .2 o CM

d CO

5 es •3 'C

CÖ 0)

ü ü cu CO til o >> ft o o o

55

CÖ

3 er CU

cö ,3

o o

55

Ö cö

HO cö 1H CU > o u CU SH

TT CU

o CU !H

3 <-*

2 H +J o

-3 '3 er

o co

•— ü cu 3

S o S ft

.OS

Ö • PH

'S c

•1*

o

T3 SH ö

,o CÖ M-H

Ö cö

ft CU

CÖ

3 er CU

TJ cö

_e SH o

3 ^-~ j» PS 2 H

+-> o

ft £ s 2 3 ö er tn

—" u CU 3

» 1 £ ft

s bJO 3

s ^ o

+3 cö ft

o >> u CU SH

i—l

w' CN

lö o

O co

cö ft 3

in

s o CÖ cö

55 CG &

03 CÖ

co

cö 3 er cu

T3 cö G

CN

#

O w cu bo cö SH o

o c

"ö> 3 3 o co tl CD ft 3 o

3 o

-Q cö

T3 CU

.S o

CD &

13 ^ "~ ö

cö u J2 ■" -2 -3 o

cu ft

co

o ft CO

-3

3 o

cö ft

3 ft 3 o

55

o SH ft bo

_s 'S >> u cu SH

SH

CU

o

-3 SH

CO bo CD SH

co 3 o

3 u o 'S

in CN

d co co

s 3

<N

d co

co cu 1H

13 u o

'S 3 3

u ft o CO r;

.2 ™ s « cö C

in CN

d 02

3 er cu

3 3

■|H SH O

CO

3

3 C*H O

to

co r, C

55 -J

3 o

co cö

Ja « " 3 CÖ >—t

ft ^ » « CU CN u ö CO 3 o

CO

CN

ft

cu -u co 3

co

cö ft O o ■ CD CN

i: ©

o co

(Tl CÖ O V,

CD

CÖ SH

CD S ft +J

3 n O n X!

CÖ cu T) 3 CU 3 o co SH

s SH

c2 CD ft 3

o CtH

CD

CD T3 cö

_G

SH o o

55

«

2 d

3 SH SH O u

H-l o 3 o

*4J cö SH

CÖ ft CD CO

CU

3 3 er

in CN

d co co SH CU 3

3 o u

•Ö cu

+3 3 bo

X co 3

£ +j

CD cö u 3 3

hr cö CD ^ SH

ft -.. s CO

o o o 3 Tl u

55 3 3

s^ cö

3 o u CD CO

cö 3 er cu

-3 cö 3

SH

O O

55

3 3

CD u 3 .2 r—H ft s o u 3 o

55

ft

co

3 3

EH

CD bo 3 SH o -u CO


IM a

d fa

(ST

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

no U

ST

clo

-

sure

docu

men

tati

on;

unre

g-

iste

red s

tora

ge

tanks; n

o

reg

istr

atio

n c

erti

fica

te

post

ed)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e se

cond

ary

conta

inm

ent

for

bulk

sto

r-

age

tanks

(ST

.5.1

); D

rain

-

age

wat

er i

s no

t tr

eate

d

pri

or

to d

isch

arg

e (S

T.5

.3)

1.

No

ML m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B

equip

men

t (T

l.10.2

)

2.

No

insp

ecti

ons

for

>50

0

ppm

PC

B t

ransf

orm

ers

(Tl.

20.7

)

3.

No

or i

nco

mp

lete

fil

e of

PC

B r

egula

tions

(Tl.

l.l.

R);

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

ann

ual

PC

B d

ocu

men

t lo

g

(Tl.

15.1

); P

CB t

ransf

orm

-

ers

pose

an

expo

sure

ris

k to

food

and f

eed

(Tl.

20.1

);

PC

B t

ransf

orm

ers

are

not

regis

tere

d w

ith t

he

fire

de-

K d

T3 d fa

age

tanks

(ST

.5.1

)

2. N

o or

inad

equat

e re

leas

e

dete

ctio

n fo

r U

ST

s

(ST

.60.

1);

Inad

equ

ate

US

T

clos

ure

(ST

.95.

3)

1.

No

ML m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B

equ

ipm

ent

(Tl.

10.2

)

2.

Curr

ent

stat

us

of o

ngoi

ng

agre

emen

ts o

r en

forc

emen

t

acti

ons

not

exam

ined

(Tl.

1.1)

; N

o or

inco

mple

te

file

of P

CB r

egula

tio

ns

(Tl.

l.l.

R)

i—i

two d

• pH

d fa

(ST

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

unre

gis

tere

d

stora

ge

tanks)

2. N

o or

in

adeq

uat

e re

cord

-

kee

pin

g r

egar

din

g U

ST

s

(ST

.90.

2)

1. N

o M

L m

arkin

gs

for

PC

B

equ

ipm

ent

(Tl.

10.2

)

o a 0

CQ O OH

TT 01 o C C8

03

o E-1

to o

i CO C

CD

s

ca o c

CD CO s CN 2 1

CO 13 +J

CD

.a I

CO CD >>

-4J co cd bo '5 10

0) +J CD CD CO ca be 'C i—i > •—'

<N d

CO ca CD •*—,

«

CO

C w

he, ca c ca

CD

CD

Cü' CJ

c CD

CO

ca CD

s G o

CO

G o

CD

o •c CH

CO H

CO

s CD co

CD

3 CO

CD

CD

ca HH oa 0> JH

I-i

CN

G ca

CD o X) r-i ca o CD ca - ca 5

s

C •-H

fa

rH

C

s u ca a

'S s o o C

• I-I

SH

o o

55

CO

1-i

CN"

>> CD > SH

3 co

'S, £ o o

.G

SH

o o

55

CO o CO CD

HO CO

< G

£ o Ü

a

3 o Z

'x CD

CD

O

G _o *-£

§ 2 +J CD

'S rH G -.; o w CD EH

"O ^^

5 ° ca +J

ca s-, CD

CD

'S s o CJ

G

CO EH

CO -4-S

G CD

s CD - G

3 cr CD

T3 ca C

o o

-t-3

C CD

s CD - 3 co C3 CD

s

3 +J CJ

2 -u CO

CO

no G ca

3 C5- CD

-Ü ca G

•r-l

« O o

r?

3 CJ

3 SH

CO

O

G

'-13

CN rH i-i co' EH

3 CT CD

ca tG

•- o o

55

S SH

O

CO

s CD CJ

c _ca

< i-i CN CO r-i CN 55 rH

CO o CO o

1

cd F—H

'S G CD

s CD

CD >

+3

CD

-1 CD ft CO o

I CO ca

CD CO ca

^2 ca

I ca

o 1-i

ca !H ca ft

1

G ca

«4-t o

G _o

CO

£ '53 >

CO

r CO CS

4) y—*

«

CO

C r—1

a>

C03 ca G ca

O SH

a CD

CO CD

co

CD

S G CO

ca

CD

CD

CD

co EH

CD S-H

ft CD

id

i-i 3 CO

CD

T3 SH

CD

ca fa a> s ^ ca ca £ o

1-i -4-> ca CD to

G _o '-C ca

r-H

G o

T3

ca CO •rH

CO

CO

t- o

ca 1UQ

-0

3. s o u

CO

i-i

CN

'S, s o Ü

CO o co CD

i-i CN

3 cr CD

T3 ca

c2

G CD

s

1—i

CN EH

ca

CD

CD

CO EH

CO

3

CD

ca

T—, ft s o CJ

3

CD

c3

s rQ 3 CO

3 cr CD

ca

s SH

o CO a _e

>> a

CO _G r—, ft G

CD

s CD S-

3

_G CD i—1

.0 G ■ f-,

13 G

ft CD .g H_

o fa Si

o o

55

a?

3 CO

u o o

55

Ö

+3

G ca

EC

o o

55

ft '3 CT CD

'S G G o CO

s o u c

l-H

o o

i-i

CO EH

o o

O o

55

ca

G o

• r-,

u

"ca 3 G

<! 55

o o

55

CD CJ

G

i-i CN CO i-i CN CO r-i

-u , "Ö3 ,

2

1

ja i—«

cd CO

Ö i—t

G a> s at be

ö

CO o -ri CO CD

X! CO cd

G

t- o o

55

'3 a" CD

CD

G G o CO SH

CD ft

CO ca CD

s &

S CD

CO

CO

'S a SH

CD

C3

s* CD cB CD eq +3 CO o a CO CD rv, +->

co

-u CJ o *J G

bo o 'S 'S CO

CD

o CO CD C3

rH

CO

ca 3

o +3

•i-i

•1H fa

s o u a u o

o co CU

co < G o

'-Ö

i-i CN EH

G

£ o u

_G

SH

O

i-i CN

>> CD >

ft CD

-t-3 C3 Ö CT

CO

ca

c2

a i-i

CD

CD

'S s O

EH

CO *a

G CD

s

CT CD

T3 ca

_G

o

ca

+3 CO CD >

_G

o 55

CS o co

CD

ca CD

s CN EH

u G

CD

3

55

o 55

SH

c2

r-i CN 1-i i-i

CO o CO G CD o

PH u CO a PQ

• pH < Pi HH

0 H

co" 0) CJ

G C3 -u CO

co" CD u G ca +j to

^2

to" CD CJ

G ca co

42

ft

SH

CD

ca 3 3 3 co K) co u o CJ

CD -t-9

'S 'S 'S cd o o EH

o EH £


CO 05

be a

-a a

fa

char

ge

(WA

.10.

4)

2.

No

or i

nad

equat

e sy

stem

for

inv

esti

gat

ion w

ater

pol

-

luti

on c

om

pla

ints

(WA

.1.3

.R)

3.

Nonco

mpli

ance

wit

h s

tate

and l

ocal r

egula

tions

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

inad

equ

ate

mai

nte

nan

ce;

un

per

mit

ted

dis

char

ge;

in

adeq

uat

e se

c-

ondar

y c

onta

inm

ent)

; In

-

troduct

ion o

f poll

uta

nts

into

PO

TW

/FO

TW

(WA

.25.

2)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h st

ate

and l

ocal

reg

ula

tions

(WQ

.3.1

)(i.

e.,

inad

equat

e

lead

sam

pli

ng;

no b

ackf

low

pre

ven

tion;

viol

atio

n of

MC

Ls)

2.

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

reco

rds

for

publ

ic w

ater

syst

ems

(WQ

.30.

1)

3.

No

or i

nad

equat

e re

cord

s

be d

d •** fa

char

ge (

WA

.10.

4)

2.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h s

tate

and

loc

al r

egula

tion

s

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

inad

equat

e

imp

lem

enta

tio

n o

f st

orm

-

wat

er p

oll

uti

on p

reven

tion

plan

; unper

mit

ted d

is-

char

ges;

inad

equat

e m

ain-

tenan

ce;

no

nco

mp

lian

ce

wit

h p

erm

it r

equir

emen

ts)

3.

Intr

oduct

ion o

f p

oll

uta

nts

into

PO

TW

/FO

TW

(WA

.25.

2)

1.

Non

com

plia

nce

wit

h o

ther

Fed

eral

reg

ula

tio

ns

regar

d-

ing

wat

er q

ual

ity (

WQ

.2.1

);

No

or i

nad

equ

ate

reco

rds

for

publ

ic w

ater

syst

ems

(WQ

.30.

1)

2.

No

or i

nco

mple

te f

ile

of

wat

er q

ual

ity r

egu

lati

on

s

(WQ

.l.l

.R); N

o or

in

ade-

quat

e re

cord

s of

act

ions

l—I

be d

d fa

luti

on c

om

pla

ints

(WA

.1.3

.R); N

onco

mpl

ianc

e

wit

h s

tate

an

d l

ocal

reg

ula

-

tions

(WA

.3.1

) (i

.e.,

inad

e-

quat

e m

ainte

nan

ce);

No

or

inad

equ

ate

surv

eill

ance

of

sto

rmw

ater

dis

char

ge

(WA

.10.

4)

3 £

0 H

"d 3

u

d


05

fcfi d

d • »-4

fa

for

com

munit

y w

ater

sys

-

tem

s (W

Q.4

0.1)

IM d

•PH

T3 d

fa

tak

en t

o co

rrec

t or

rep

air

the

dis

trib

uti

on s

yst

em

(WQ

.1.3

.R)

p-1

d •PH

d fa

o & 0


Appendix I: Top Three Findings Across Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for Army National Guard

Topic Finding

Air Emissions Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.

(AE.3.1) (i.e., open burning; inadequate labeling; cold

cleaner lids left open; unpermitted discharge) Class 1

2. No or inadequate CFC/Halon annual report.

(AE.85.1.G) Class 3

3. Lack of or inappropriate refrigeration recovery and

recycling equipment. (AE.90.5) Class 1

Cultural Resources Mgt. 1. No or inadequate historic properties survey/National

Register. (CR.5.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate ICRMP. (CR.5.1.G) Class 1

3. No or inadequate preparation and implementation of

anHPP. (CR.1.6.G)C7ass3

Hazardous Materials Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.

(HM.3.1) (i.e., inadequate labeling; inadequate flam-

mable/combustible storage; inadequate hazardous ma-

terials inventory; visible spills) HS

2. Containers of hazardous materials are not correctly

labeled, tagged, or marked. (HM.1.3) HS

3. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations.

(HM.2.1)flS

Hazardous Waste Mgt. 1. Inadequate or lack of characterization of wastes.

(HW.10.1) Class 1


(HW.3.1) (i.e., improper disposal of fluorescent light

bulbs; uncharacterized waste; inadequate mainte-


Topic


Other Environmental Issues: NEPA

Other Env. Issues: Noise

Other Env. Issues: IRP

Other Env. Issues: P2

Other Env. Issues: Program Mgt.

Finding

nance; disposal of hazardous waste at an unapproved

facility; no designated accumulation point) Class 1

3. No or inadequate written hazardous waste manage-

ment plan. (HW.1.3.G) Class 3

1. Inadequate management of dust, runoff, silt, and ero-

sion debris. (NR.10.9.G) Class 3


(NR.3.1) Class 1 (i.e., POL spills; inadequate erosion control)

3. Lack of or inadequate INRMP. (NR.1.3.G)CZass3

1. NEPA not integrated into planning. (01.5.1) Class 1

2. No or inadequate implementation of NEPA. (01.1.3.G) Class 1

1. No or inadequate noise complaint procedure.

(O2.1.10.G)CZass3

2. No or inadequate ICUZ study. (02.1.3.G)C7ass3

3. No or inadequate ICUZ committee. (02.1.4.G) Class 3

1. No or inadequate screening for past use of hazardous

substances. (03.1.3.G)C7ass3

1. No or incomplete master listing of all hazardous substances. (O4.10.1.G)CZass3

2. Pollution prevention plan inadequate or incomplete. (04.5.1) Class 1

3. No designated P2 POC. (04.1.12.G); No or inadequate

budgeting and implementation of hazardous waste

minimization and pollution prevention. (O4.10.4.G)

Class 3

1. No or inadequate EQCC. (05.1.6.G) Class 3

2. Noncompliance with other Federal regulations.

(05.2.1) Class 1


Topic Finding

Pesticides Mgt. 1. No or inadequate disposal for all excess pesticides.

(PM.55A.G) Class 3


(PM.3.1) (i.e., uncertified applicator; improper storage)

Class 1

3. Government pesticide applicators not certified.

(PM.5.1.G) Class 3

POL Mgt. 1. No or inadequate ISCP. (P0.5.3.G) Class 3

2. No or inadequate spill containment and cleanup mate-

rials. (PO.20.1) Class 1

3. No "USED OIL" label on containers other than tanks.

(PO.65.6) Class 1

Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.

(SO.3.1) (i.e., inadequate maintenance; open dumping;

waste tire storage; improper disposal of regulated

medical waste) Class 1

2. Inadequate participation in state/local recycling pro-

grams. (S0.25.1.G) Class 3


waste. (SO. 10.1) Class 1

Storage Tanks Mgt. 1. No or inadequate secondary containment for bulk

storage tanks. (ST.5.1) Class 1


(ST.3.1) (i.e., unregistered storage tanks; inadequate

USTs; inadequate recordkeeping; inadequate

spill/overflow protection; no UST closure documenta-

tion) Class 1

3. Inadequate maintenance of UST. (ST.95.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, PCB 1. No ML markings for PCB equipment. (Tl. 10.2) Class

1

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 1. No or inadequate Installation Asbestos Management

Plan. (T2.1A.G) Class 3


Topic Finding

2. No or inadequate asbestos survey. (T2.1.3.G) Class 3

3. Improper disposal of asbestos containing material.

(T2.15.1) Class 1

Toxic Substances, Radon 1. Radon measurements not performed. (T3.1.3.G) Class

3

2. No or inadequate measurements of Priority 1 struc-

tures. (T3.1A.G) Class 3

Toxic Substances, LBP v N/A

Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.

(WA.3.1) (i.e., unpermitted discharge; no operation and

maintenance manual for WWTP; inadequate secon-

dary containment; noncompliance with permit re-

quirements; inadequate maintenance; inadequate

stormwater pollution prevention plan) Class 1

2. Introduction of pollutants into POTW/FOTW.

(WA.25.2) Class 1

3. No application for industrial activity stormwater per-

mit. (WA. 10.3) Class 1

Water Quality Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and local regulations.

(WQ.3.1) (i.e., improper well closure; well near con-

tamination source) Class 1


Appendix J: Top Three Findings in Fiscal Years 1997-1998 by Topic for the Army National Guard

Topic Finding FY97 Finding FY98

Air Emissions

Mgt.

1. Noncompliance with state and

local regulations. (AE.3.1) (i.e.,

inadequate labeling; open burn-

ing)

2. No or inadequate CFC/Halon an-

nual report. (AE.85.1.G)

3. Knowing release of Class I or

Class II substance used as a re-

frigerant. (AE.90.3)


local regulations (AE.3.1) (i.e.,

open burning; cold cleaner lids

left open)

2. No or incomplete quarterly CFC

procurement report (AE.85.1.G)

3. No or inadequate emissions in-

ventory (AE. 1.3. G)

Cultural

Resources Mgt.

1. No or inadequate historic proper-

ties survey/National Register.

(CR.5.1)

2. No or inadequate ICRMP.

(CR.5.1.G)

3. No or inadequate preparation and

implementation of an HPP.

(CR.1.6.G)

1. No or inadequate historic proper-

ties survey/National Register

(CR.5.1); No or inadequate

ICRMP (CR.5.1.G); Effects of un-

dertaking on historic proper-

ties/National Register not taken

into account (CR.5.2)

Hazardous

Materials Mgt.


local regulations. (HM.3.1) (i.e.,

no discharge notification placard;

improper flammable/combustible

storage)

2. Containers of hazardous materi-

als are not correctly labeled,


local regulations (HM.3.1) (i.e.,

visible spills; inadequate hazard-

ous materials inventory)

2. Noncompliance with other Fed-

eral regulations regarding haz-

ardous materials (HM.2.1)



tagged or marked. (HM.1.3)

3. Noncompliance with other Fed-

eral regulations. (HM.2.1); In-

adequate training in the trans-

portation of hazardous materials.

(HM.50.8)

Hazardous Waste

Mgt. 1. Inadequate or lack of characteri-

zation of wastes. (HW.10.1)


local regulations. (HW.3.1) (i.e.,

uncharacterized waste; inade-

quate recordkeeping; improper

disposal of fluorescent bulbs; haz-

ardous waste disposed to an un-

approved facility; improper

transportation of hazardous

waste)

3. No or inadequate written hazard-

ous waste management plan.

(HW.1.3.G)

1. Inadequate or lack of characteri-

zation of wastes (HW.10.1)


local regulations (HW.3.1) (i.e.,

inadequate recordkeeping; un-

characterized waste; no desig-

nated accumulation point; incom-

plete manifests; improper

transportation of hazardous

wastes)

3. Inappropriately operating as a

CESQG(HW.15.1)

Natural

Resources

Mgt.

1. Inadequate management of dust,

runoff, silt, and erosion debris.

(NR.10.9.G)

2. Lack of or inadequate INRMP.

(NR.1.3.G)


local regulations. (NR.3.1) (i.e.,

no permit obtained; inadequate

erosion control)


local regulations (NR.3.1) (i.e.,

visible spills; no permit obtained)

2. Inadequate management of dust,

runoff, silt, and erosion debris

(NR.10.9.G); No or inadequate

survey of endangered and threat-

ened species (NR.20.1)

Other

Environmental

Issues: NEPA

1. NEPA not integrated into plan-

ning. (01.5.1)

2. No or inadequate implementation

of NEPA. (01.1.3.G)

1. NEPA not integrated into plan-

ning (01.5.1)

Other 1. No or inadequate noise complaint N/A



Environmental procedure. (O2.1.10.G)

Issues: Noise 2. No or inadequate ICUZ study.

(02.1.3.G)

3. No or inadequate ICUZ commit-

tee. (02.1.4.G)

Other 1. No or inadequate screening for 1. No or inadequate screening for

Environmental past use of hazardous substances. past use of hazardous substances

Issues: IRP (03.1.3.G) (03.1.3.G)

Other 1. No or incomplete master listing of 1. Pollution prevention plan inade-

Environmental all hazardous substances. quate or incomplete (04.5.1); No

Issues: P2 (O4.10.l.G) or incomplete master listing of all

2. Pollution prevention plan inade- hazardous substances (04.10.l.G)

quate or incomplete. (04.5.1)

3. No designated P2 POC.

(04.1.12.G); No or inadequate

budgeting and implementation of

hazardous waste minimization

and pollution prevention.

(O4.10.4.G)

Other 1. No or inadequate EQCC. 1. Noncompliance with other Fed-

Environmental (05.1.6.G) eral regulations regarding pro-

Issues: Program gram management (05.2.1)

Mgt.

Pesticides Mgt. 1. No or inadequate disposal for all 1. No or inadequate Installation

excess pesticides. (PM.55.1.G) Pest Management Plan

2. Noncompliance with state and (PM.1.4.G)

local regulations. (PM.3.1) (i.e., 2. Noncompliance with state and

uncertified applicator; improper local regulations (PM.3.1) (i.e.,

storage); Government pesticide improper storage)

applicators not certified.

(PM.5.1.G)

POL Mgt. 1. Lack of or inadequate spill con- 1. NocopyofSPCC(P0.5.1)



tainment and cleanup materials. 2. No or inadequate ISCP (P0.5.3.G)

(PO.20.1); No or inadequate 3. SPCC plan inadequate (PO.5.2);

ISCP. (P0.5.3.G) No "USED OIL" label on contain-

2. NoSPCC. (PO.5.1) ers other than tanks (PO.65.6)

Solid Waste Mgt. 1. Nonparticipation in state/local 1. Noncompliance with state and

recycling programs. (S0.25.1.G) local regulations (SO.3.1) (i.e.,

2. Noncompliance with state and improper management of regu-

local regulations. (SO.3.1) (i.e., lated medical waste; open dump-

open burning; inadequate main- ing)

tenance; waste tire storage) 2. Nonparticipation in state/local

3. Inadequate segregation of recy- recycling programs (S0.25.1.G)

clable materials from solid waste. 3. Open dumping is practiced at the

(SO.10.1) facility (SO.35.20)

Storage Tanks 1. No or inadequate secondary con- 1. Noncompliance with state and

Mgt. tainment for bulk storage tanks. local regulations (ST.3.1) (i.e., un-

(ST.5.1) registered storage tanks; inade-

2. Noncompliance with state and quate spill/overflow protection;

local regulations. (ST.3.1) (i.e., inadequate USTs; improper clo-

unregistered storage tanks; im- sure of UST)

proper UST closure; inadequate 2. (No or inadequate secondary con-

inspection) tainment for bulk storage tanks

3. Inadequate maintenance of UST. ST.5.1)

(ST.95.1) 3. Substandard USTs not upgraded,

closed, or removed (ST.25.1)

Toxic Substances, 1. No ML markings for PCB equip- N/A

PCB ment. (Tl.10.2)

Toxic Substances, 1. No or incomplete Installation As- 1. No or inadequate Installation As-

Asbestos bestos Management Plan. bestos Management Plan

(T2.1.4.G) (T2.1.4.G)

2. No or incomplete asbestos survey. 2. No or incomplete asbestos survey

(T2.1.3.G) (T2.1.3.G)

3. Improper disposal of asbestos

containing material. (T2.15.1)



Toxic Substances, 1. Radon measurements not per- N/A

Radon formed. (T3.1.3.G)

2. No or inadequate measurements

of Priority 1 structures.

(T3.1.4.G)

Toxic Substances, N/A N/A

LBP

Wastewater Mgt. 1. Noncompliance with state and 1. Noncompliance with state and

local regulations. (WA.3.1) (i.e., local regulations (WA.3.1) (i.e.,

unpermitted discharge; inade- inadequate stormwater pollution

quate secondary containment; no prevention plan; unpermitted dis-

grease trap; inadequate mainte- charge; noncompliance with per-

nance; no stormwater pollution mit requirements; no grease

prevention plan) traps; improper closure of moni-

2. Introduction of pollutants into toring wells)

POTW/FOTW. (WA.25.2) 2. Introduction of pollutants into

3. No application for industrial ac- POTW/FOTW (WA.25.2)

tivity stormwater permit. 3. No or inadequate notification to

(WA.10.3) POTW/FOTW of discharges that

could cause problems (WA.25.3)

Water Quality 1. Noncompliance with state and 1. Noncompliance with state and

Mgt. local regulations. (WQ.3.1) (i.e., local regulations (WQ.3.1) (i.e.,

inadequate recordkeeping; im- improper well closure; well near

proper well closure) contamination source)

C

c Li. 0)

(0 o Q. 0) J2 CO

■D C (0 o >

o Q.

X

C 0) Q.

<

FYO

O

P/F

P

rH

CS

a

o

cS -u C3

TJ O

2;

FY

99

P/F

P

CN

CO

CS T3 O

55

CO

CO

o 2:

FY

98

P/F

P

•* ^

o o o

FY

97

P/F

P

00 o LO CO

o o

FY

96

P/F

P

o CN i-l

CO I-l

CN 1—1

CB

CS 13

O

55

FY

95

P/F

P

lO o

CO -*■> CB

O

55

FY

94

P/F

P

1—1

co" m

o LO

i> CO

CB

CB T3

O

55

FY

93

P/F

P CS

o 55

ID T—1

So CM

CB -4J CB

"Ö

O

55

FY

92

P/F

P cB

+J C3

T5 O

55

o CO

O

CB

CB T3

O

2

FY

91

P/F

P cd

-u CS

T3 O

55

CO

o

CB -u CB

O

2

s 0

CS N

• pH

(3 S*

o

s cu

_> +3 o <

CD > SH CD CO CD

>> s

<!

CS

o 1—1

CB Ö

_o '-Ö

CB

55 >> S

FY

00

P/F

P CB

CB

O

2

CN

in 00

CB -4-»

CB "Ö

O

2

CN

CN

CB

CB ~a O

55

CS

CS

o 55

FY

99

P/F

P

OS CN

ob

oo co

OS

CN

CS +J CS

-Ö

o 55

CN i—1

Ü5 ^ ■^

FY

98

P/F

P

CB

CB -o o

55

Tf

^

CB +J CB

O

55

CS

cB

O

cB

cB T> O 2

cB

cB

o 55

CS +-> CB

T3 O

55

FY

97

P/F

P

CN i—1

CN CN rH

o rH

CB

CB T3 O

55

CB -4-» CB

O

55

CB

CS T} O

55

CB

CB TJ O

55

FY

96

P/F

P

co" CO

CO

co *-H

CO

o rH

o rH

5! CO

o 00

FY

95

P/F

P

i—i CN

CO rH

CN

00" CN

OS CO

00

CB

CS

O

55

CB

CB T3 O

55

FY

94

P/F

P

ob" rH

So rH

co o CN

CB -4-i CS

O

2

CS

CB T3 O

55

cB +J CB

13

O

55

CS -4J CS

T3 O

55

Act

ive

Arm

y

Maj

or

Co

mm

and

O

o o o

ü

o En

Q

O Ü Q

Ü

m 5

<3

CO

r3

CO ■*-) *-> CO o

i TJ> 2 -c 2 ~ Tf

T- — +

CM o 2 2 ~c

CO CM

CO co 00 *-> „ «j w

05 o 2 ■o 2 •3

o

CS _ +

<35 o 2

o 2 -a OS

00 5C 00 1 C~ t- X CM

£ W ~H co co

£ + 00 ■tf o CN

^ CM

t> i Tf< t> TT cc

s s .-H CM in o

(/> 05 CO ~H 05

D> m m O

C + CO CO o t-

■o CO ,

00 <35 o 2

cS cs

co

CO c T—( t> -a CM

■ MM

LL + oo o en n ^H CM 2 -n ^H

0) > o CS CO

■ ■Mi

C3 «5 in

CN CD CO 2

cs -a CM

Ö) o + OS

CM »—t o

2 CS

cs -a

o CO

z CM CM in

CS 4-j CM

(0 •<* T—1

CM o CO 2

cs 05 CN

3 £ (0 + CO t> T—<

o 2

*-> cs

O 05

O t- i-H "Ö 1-H

> ' o 2

CS

cS T3

OS 00 o

2 cs CS

T3

0) 00 o 1—1

0 > + CS

in CS w ■■■■

2 CS 00 CS 00

+* T3 »—t 2 -o !-<

o 1

2

CS

CS o 7—1

05 o 2

CS ■4-»

CS T!

o 1-H 05

Q. + o

2 CS

-t-> CS O o

CS -t-3 CS o

13 C^ 2 -o »

■ ■ CS CS

—■ i o 2 CS

13 in m

o 2

*-> cs

10

X ■ ■Hi

■o + o 2

CS

CS T3 CO

o 2

CS -^ CS

T3 co

c 0 ■

Q. Q. <

a ö es 0 on a

CD

C <D C en C CD < P4

CS c

>> o

!* CS

<d 2

U CS 3 Ü

01 "a 0

■ o S Tf 05 o $ ■* o S o 5 c» o

i * 3 CO 00 H X 4j t>

T3 245 eo o

+ 55 £ t> <M i-H 243 ■* 5 - 2-S

CO

OS i i

o CO

05 o CO

o 1—1

r- i—i 55 « ^ -a tM

C5 m

r-t eo o

+ CD co i-H i-i i—i 2-3 i—i 00 «0

05

s* o 5- O +j o S o 5 o S © GO

■ in *4j ^ -a 2~g Z4j w

+ 5-8 o.2 o S n rt o n 55 «s ^ T3

oo Z4j 55 * Z£ 55 =ö X

t- i i

CM CM

oo CO CM

CD CO

5 * *4j

O -M CM X

£ £

+ CO co CM CM

5- T3 2-§

i-t n

o i> oo CM o rH in CO © X iH

IM (M TH o> CO O i-H CO CO m 1-1 1—i (N 1—1

+ o i-H CO

05 i-H 1—1

i—l oo 50

l-H

w i ■

in OS

oo

o i-i oo

o CM co

o CO 1—1

►2- ^4j

©

I©

+ oo CO t> o i-H ,o3 o5 Si CM <* co i-H i-H *-3 ^4j 0<l

■*

i CM CO

C5

o i-H *4J £-8 24j

O *j eo CM

CM

+ m ■* co 5* oS oS o5 eo CM CO CM *4j Ä fg *4J ^4J t>

a 0

•i-i -M 53 s

§ o Q

a u Ü O <: cc O Ü

O Ü co £ 3 g g 2 K O Q H CO CO O

^ H fa s S E3 53 H


Appendix M: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Active Army

This chart indicates the areas where the predominance of noncompliance findings occur and how that can change from FY to FY (of positive/of negative). Posi- tive Findings include all findings originally classed as Positive plus those reclassified as False Positives.

The Active Army data include AMC, TRADOC, FORSCOM, MDW, MEDCOM, USARPAC, and USMA.

All Active Army

Topic FY94

VI-

FY95

VI-

FY96

VI-

FY97

VI-

FY98

VI-

FY99

VI-

FY00

VI-

Air Emissions 1/51 13/213 10/95 1/48 0/2 5/73 1/26

Cultural

Resources

2/53 6/84 15/86 3/38 1/0 7/52 7/52

Hazardous

materials

8/178 14/396 8/236 4/72 1/8 3/129 0/1

Hazardous Waste 13/458 10/313 4/173 1/92 0/6 1/119 3/65

Natural

Resources

2/78 9/81 15/50 3/39 1/2 9/34 2/19

Other Env Issues,

NEPA

3/54 8/69 4/29 1/37 1/0 7/27 2/7

Other Env. Issues,

Noise

0/24 10/46 13/33 2/10 No data 7/13 2/9


Topic FY94

P/-

FY95

P/-

FY96

P/-

FY97

P/-

FY98

P/-

FY99

P/-

FYOO

PA

Other Env. Issues,

IRP

2/3 1/7 4/24 2/6 No data 1/5 0/1

Other Env. Issues,

P2

1/7 2/9 8/10 6/12 1/1 7/18 0/1

Other Env. Issues,

Program Mgt.

10/38 13/64 18/68 5/16 1/0 16/37 3/20

Pesticides 3/79 4/206 4/173 0/133 1/5 5/104 1/52

POL Mgt. 10/320 3/182 3/152 0/78 0/14 1/83 1/31

Solid Waste 6/100 11/162 11/133 4/47 1/3 5/73 2/21

Storage Tanks 2/335 2/126 6/108 0/49 0/1 7/40 0/25

Toxic Substances,

PCB 2/36 1/60 1/26 0/20 No data 0/18 0/3

Toxic Substances,

Asbestos

4/84 2/61 0/66 0/28 0/2 3/31 0/10

Toxic Substances,

Radon

0/5 0/7 0/7 0/3 No data 0/8 0/2

Toxic Substances,

LBP 0/0 0/5 1/14 1/11 No data 0/13 1/3

Wastewater 2/159 10/259 3/194 1/92 0/8 2/109 0/41

Water Quality 2/60 10/190 17/172 1/85 0/5 2/107 3/51


AMC

Topic FY94

VI-

FY95

VI-

FY96

VI-

FY97

VI-

FY98

VI-

FY99

VI-

FY00

VI-

Air Emissions 0/28 4/29 1/13 1/9 No data 0/10 No data

Cultural Resources 1/40 1/32 0/8 0/7 No data 0/9 No data

Hazardous

Materials

3/32 2/21 3/16 0/16 No data 1/6 No data

Hazardous Waste 1/90 5/57 0/27 0/22 No data 0/11 No data

Natural Resources 2/41 1/20 0/8 0/6 No data 1/5 No data

Other Env Issues,

NEPA

2/50 3/33 0/9 0/6 No data 1/8 No data

Other Env. Issues,

Noise

0/14 1/9 1/0 No data No data No data No data

Other Env Issues,

IRP

2/1 0/0 1/6 0/2 No data No data No data

Other Env Issues,

P2


Other Env Issues,

Program Mgt.


Pesticides 2/53 0/36 0/33 0/40 No data 0/8 No data

POL Mgt. 0/23 0/34 0/34 0/15 No data 0/12 No data

Solid Waste 2/20 1/20 1/13 0/3 No data 1/5 No data

Storage Tanks 0/47 1/25 2/30 0/19 No data 1/6 No data

Toxic Substances,

PCB

1/26 1/28 0/13 0/9 No data 0/2 No data

Toxic Substances,

Asbestos

1/43 2/17 0/31 0/14 No data 0/9 No data


Topic FY94

PA

FY95

PA

FY96

PA

FY97

PA

FY98

PA

FY99

PA

FYOO

PA

Toxic Substances,

Radon


Toxic Substances,

LBP

0/0 0/0 0/1 0/1 No data 0/1 No data

Wastewater 0/47 1/52 0/40 0/26 No data 0/23 No data

Water Quality 1/43 1/25 0/25 0/18 No data 0/12 No data

TOTALS 25/627 28/451 10/320 3/222 No data 5/115 No data


TRADOC

Topic FY94

P/-

FY95

P/-

FY96

P/-

FY97

P/-

FY98

P/-

FY99

P/-

FY00

P/-

Air Emissions 1/8 6/96 4/6 0/14 0/2 2/18 0/6

Cultural Resources 0/5 3/20 3/7 0/4 1/0 4/5 1/0

Hazardous

Materials

5/92 6/138 1/58 2/14 1/7 4/44 No data

Hazardous Waste 7/116 2/100 1/21 0/31 0/4 1/47 1/11

Natural Resources 0/17 2/23 5/12 1/6 1/2 4/4 No data

Other Env. Issues,

NEPA

1/2 1/14 2/6 1/9 1/0 1/9 1/0

Other Env. Issues,

Noise

0/4 5/10 3/9 0/4 0/0 2/2 No data

Other Env. Issues,

IRP

0/0 0/0 2/4 0/1 0/0 1/0 0/1

Other Env. Issues, P2 0/0 2/2 5/1 1/1 1/1 2/3 0/1

Other Env. Issues,

Program Mgt.

0/5 6/21 3/12 0/6 1/0 5/4 1/0

Pesticides 0/7 2/63 0/37 0/27 1/4 3/29 1/2

POL Mgt. 2/52 1/65 1/26 0/23 0/12 0/23 0/8

Solid Waste 0/30 1/74 1/22 1/19 1/3 3/18 1/1

Storage Tanks 1/64 1/31 2/19 0/13 0/1 2/14 0/3

Toxic Substances,

PCB

1/3 0/15 0/5 0/7 0/0 0/9 0/1

Toxic Substances,

Asbestos

3/8 0/24 0/6 0/3 0/2 0/8 0/2


Topic FY94

P/-

FY95

P/-

FY96

P/-

FY97

P/-

FY98

P/-

FY99

P/-

FYOO

P/-

Toxic Substances,

Radon

0/0 0/1 0/0 0/0 0/0 No data No data

Toxic Substances,

LBP

0/0 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/0 0/4 0/1

Wastewater 0/22 4/90 2/35 0/24 0/7 1/43 0/7

Water Quality 1/13 1/60 2/39 0/30 0/5 2/31 1/11

TOTALS 22/447 43/849 37/327 6/238 7/50 37/315 7/55


FORSCOM

Topic FY94

P/-

FY95

P/-

FY96

P/-

FY97

P/-

FY98

VI-

FY99

P/-

FY00

P/-

Air Emissions 0/15 2/68 2/37 0/16 No data 1/5 0/8

Cultural Resources 1/9 1/23 12/38 3/18 No data 1/4 2/9

Hazardous

Materials

0/54 5/147 1/46 2/34 No data 0/6 No data

Hazardous Waste 5/252 1/105 1/57 1/33 No data 0/10 2/35

Natural Resources 0/20 6/28 9/12 2/23 No data 1/6 2/10

Other Env. Issues,

NEPA

0/3 0/17 0/4 0/21 No data 3/3 1/5

Other Env. Issues,

Noise

0/6 4/21 9/15 2/6 No data 2/3 1/7

Other Env. Issues,

IRP


Other Env. Issues, P2 1/3 0/5 2/5 4/5 No data 1/0 0/4

Other Env. Issues,

Program Mgt.

3/12 1/18 7/12 2/7 No data 2/3 1/9

Pesticides 1/19 1/51 4.46 0/57 No data 0/9 0/28

POL Mgt. 8/245 2/49 1/42 0/32 No data 1/4 1/10

Solid Waste 4/50 7/48 4/43 2/21 No data 0/10 1/12

Storage Tanks 1/224 0/46 0/28 0/14 No data 1/3 0/12

Toxic Substances,

PCB

0/7 0/15 0/6 0/2 No data No data 0/2

Toxic Substances,

Asbestos

0/33 0/11 0/13 0/7 No data 1/0 0/3


Topic FY94

VI-

FY95

VI-

FY96

VI-

FY97

VI-

FY98

VI-

FY99

VI-

FY00

VI-

Toxic Substances,

Radon

0/1 0/3 0/0 0/1 No data 0/3 No data

Toxic Substances,

LBP

0/0 0/1 0/4 0/5 No data 0/2 No data

Wastewater 2/90 3/86 2/56 1/32 No data 0/10 0/15

Water Quality 0/4 3/61 5/44 1/30 No data 0/10 1/20

TOTALS 26/1049 38/791 67/483 22/367 No data 13/91 12/189


MDW

Topic FY95

P/-

FY96

P/-

FY99*

P/-

Air Emissions 1/17 2/9 0/16

Cultural Resources 1/4 0/11 1/12

Hazardous Materials 1/71 0/40 0/16

Hazardous Waste 0/38 0/23 0/24

Natural Resources 0/6 1/5 1/4

Other Env. Issues, NEPA 1/4 2/0 No data

Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/6 0/0 No data

Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/0 0/1 0/1

Other Env. Issues, P2 0/0 0/1 1/2

Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 2/13 2/12 3/9

Pesticides 1/42 0/16 1/21

POL Mgt. 0/24 0/11 0/19

Solid Waste 0/14 3/17 1/8

Storage Tanks 0/20 0/4 1/2

Toxic Substances, PCB 0/2 0/1 0/4

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/6 0/5 1/2

Toxic Substances, Radon 0/1 0/0 No data

Toxic Substances, LBP 0/1 1/1 No data

Wastewater 0/22 0/14 1/18

Water Quality 3/29 3/21 0/13

TOTALS 18/421 14/193 11/171

*There are no data for FY97 or FY98.


MEDCOM

Topic FY95

P/-

FY96

P/-

FY99*

P/-

Air Emissions 0/3 0/10 1/1

Cultural Resources 0/5 0/4 1/4

Hazardous materials 0/19 0/29 0/1

Hazardous Waste 2/13 0/6 0/5

Natural Resources 0/4 0/4 0/4

Other Env. Issues, NEPA 3/1 0/2 No data

Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/0 0/0 No data

Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/0 0/0 No data

Other Env. Issues, P2 0/0 0/0 1/2

Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 0/2 0/4 0/4

Pesticides 0/14 0/17 0/14

POL Mgt. 0/10 0/10 0/6

Solid Waste 2/6 0/7 0/4

Storage Tanks 0/4 0/5 0/4

Toxic Substances, PCB 0/0 0/1 No data

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/3 0/2 0/5

Toxic Substances, Radon 0/1 0/2 0/2

Toxic Substances, LBP 0/1 0/0 1/1

Wastewater 2/9 0/19 0/8

Water Quality 2/15 1/8 0/9

TOTALS 11/110 1/130 4/74



USARPAC

Topic FY96

P/-

FY99*

P/-

Air Emissions 0/7 1/18

Cultural Resources 0/5 1/12

Hazardous materials 3/26 1/28

Hazardous Waste 2/19 1/21

Natural Resources 0/3 1/12

Other Env Issues, NEPA 0/5 1/6

Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/8 3/7

Other Env Issues, IRP 1/1 0/3

Other Env Issues, P2 1/1 2/9

Other Env Issues, Program Mgt. 1/11 3/13

Pesticides 0/14 0/29

POL Mgt. 0/14 0/19

Solid Waste 2/20 0/17

Storage Tanks 2/15 2/15

Toxic Substances, PCB 1/0 0/2

Toxic Substances, Asbestos 0/6 1/9

Toxic Substances, Radon 0/3 0/3

Toxic Substances, LBP 0/3 0/4

Wastewater 0/18 0/17

Water Quality 4/22 0/29

TOTALS 17/212 17/273



USMA

Topic FY96

P/-

FY99

P/-



Hazardous Materials 0/15 2/16



Other Env. Issues, NEPA 0/1 0/1

Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/0 No data

Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/2 No data

Other Env Issues, P2 0/0 No data

Other Env. Issues, Program Mgt. 3/6 2/3

Pesticides 0/5 1/4

POL Mgt. 1/13 0/2


Storage Tanks 0/4 No data





Wastewater 0/9 0/5


TOTALS 8/115 8/59

0

ü Q.

CÜ

C

0) >

(0 ö) 0

(0 3 0 </> > JL_ 0) 0 > 0)

0 0 £ DC

Ü- <

>- co a

0) «3

cö

o

« -U CO

£ 3,

cü

CD w o

X.

o

■n c

w O

0) >

03 O

co

CD CO CO

Sß « C ü

'S _ü> c

«3 CD o C

C •& •c o

^5 co S- bo £ .5 ° 'S C-> ä c S o *c c —

'S « CD

11 £ CO o ho CD Ä

& .£ CD fe

'S CD

CD 55 ä o

CO CO* CD u CO

CD

CO CD

-t-> ca

CD > cö bD CD Ö

CD >

T3 'S ^ X •1-H CO >

P -J3 I^M

cö

o _C0 F

Y(o

fp

lse

Posi

c 0 Q. Q. <

FY

98

P/-

CO 1—1

o 00 CN

CN

ö CO

o o

FY

97

P/-

CO CN

CN o

CN

CN

i> CD CN

i—l

FY

96

P/-

05 CN O

<o o

CN in CN

co I—1

o F

Y95

P/-

CN O

CN

o 1—1

ö o 1—1

o

FY

94

P/-

O in CO in

CO

oo i—i

T—1

o 1—1

FY

93

P/-

CO in co co

in co co in co

CN CN CN

01 i-H

FY

92

P/-

10 I—1

co co

CN CD i—I

CO

00 00

LO

5? co

FY

91

P/-

5 o

o o

00 o

CN i—1

CN

o o

co c 'co co

's •- < C

ult

ura

l

Res

ourc

es

Haz

ardous

Mat

eria

ls

CD

CO CÖ

CO

o T3 s- ca N ca

co CD O t~

o co 0)

ca

ca

FY

98

VI-

i—i

o CO

CN i—1

CN

o

i—l i—1

©

to r—1

o 5? o

CO

©

FY

97

VI-

Ö o <N

o 5! o

CO T-H

i-H

CO i—l

©

CO

o

o CO

io CO

CN

FY

96

VI-

9S o

CO

o ©

CT5 CN ©

LO CO

CO

JO o

©

CO

i-H CO

CO

«5 o o

1—1

o JO o

1-1

© ©

o 1-H

o LO

o © 1-H

FY

94

VI-

LO 1-H

<N

o CO i-H

©

oo CN

CN CO

o i—H

CN i-H

©

1-H i-H

eo CO CO

1—1 t> ■—

00

os CN

CM

CM o o 1-1

o5

© 1-H

i-H

i-H oo i-H

oS T-H

CN

CO CN

FY

92

VI-

1-H LO CO

c3

t-H t-l

CN CN

«5 LO i-H

?3

CN o

o i-H

FY91

VI-

o o

CN

©

© o

CN

o o © o

i-H

o ;s

o

0 H

'S ^<

^ 2 S CD •£) CD S > 3

13 c to O H Ä

13 C to

^ 2 s CD -S3 tu

M > 2 O W Ä

Ö A

s « ^ 9 m"

1 * § o ä M

"es

Ö CD Ö CM

>H 2 » 1 £ s 5 £ is

T3 S

S g St So CD o

1* u 2 «r

13 Ö co bo O H Ä S

co CD

U •I-H -M CO CD

PH

H-, o PH

CD

co CS

'o


FY

98

VI-

co o

o o

LO

Ö CO

Ö O

LO rH

O

CM

o rH

FY

97

VI-

rH rH

IN

CO

T—1

LO CO

o

00

o rH

o CO

o CD

o CN jo

CO

FY

96

VI-

CN

ö 05 1—1

rH

i-H

o

LO CO

Ö o o

o o

«s

00 CN

FY

95

VI-

o CN

Ö CN

©

o o

o © o

©

©

CO CO FH

FY

94

VI-

CO CN

LO

05 rH

CO

LO

T—1

CO

CN 1—1

©

CO CO

rH

CO o CO

rH rH

FY

93

VI-

CO

1 CO CO

rH

CO CO rH

CN rH

LO t>

CO rH

o o

CO

CO

CN

rH rH

OS t- rH

in CO rH

FY

92

VI-

CO co CN

ID T-l

CN

CO CD

c3

CO

o o o

CO LO rH

CO

«5 rH C35

rH

FY

91

VI-

CO

o rH

o 5! o T—1

o o o

co ©

o ©

JO CO

o

0

CO r* C CO

EH

CD be C3 (-, o

CO Tox

ic S

ubst

ance

s,

PCB

Tox

ic S

ubst

ance

s,

Asb

esto

s

Tox

ic S

ubst

ance

s,

Rad

on

Tox

ic S

ubst

ance

s,

LB

P

u CD

+-> c«

CD

CO cd

la

S-i CD

c3

CO

i o


Appendix O: Positive Versus Negative Findings By Topic for the Army National Guard

This chart indicates the areas where the predominance of noncompliance findings occur and how that can change from FY to FY (of positive/of negative). Posi- tive Findings include all findings originally classed as Positive plus those reclassified as False Positives.

Topic FY97

VI-

FY98

VI-



Hazardous Materials 0/14 0/5



Other Env. Issues, NEPA 0/57 0/8

Other Env. Issues, Noise 0/16 0/0

Other Env. Issues, IRP 0/19 0/1

Other Env. Issues, P2 0/8 0/1

Other Env. Issues,

Program Mgt.

0/3 0/1

Pesticides 0/34 0/2

POL Mgt. 0/447 0/82


Storage Tanks 0/150 0/82


Topic FY97

P/-

FY98

P/-





Wastewater 0/166 0/46


TOTALS 0/1541 0/386

LL 0 n (0 c o I*-»

(0 0 3 O

C 0 Q. a. <

s CO

bo o

OH

CO < O W >>

w be g Ö

«Ö

r2 Co Ö o • (—( to

C*H o r-l CD

3

'S o

«1

>

CO o a, be c

•rH

W

Cd cd o -*J -u

i CO iß

C3

O

55

cd "d

o 55

CO us

CO CO Si +3 +3 C35 -* CO cd -*

£ io TJ T3 w rH o O

55 1-4

Cd X +3

o r-l

Cd

o 55

CO CD 1-H

t»

as (M rH o

CO o F-t

CO CO +3

OS to

as ca

o 55

00 rH !-H

cd w +3 0) r-l cd <N

£ CO rH T3 CD I—1 O

55 l-H

Cd ■* +3

0) CO rH cd t~

B OS rH T3 o rH rH o

55 CO

Cd cd eo +J +3 05 Cd •* cd "*

B T3 co T3 CD O

55 CN o

55 CM

Cd cd cN +J +3 0» CO CO cd CO

£ TJ CO T3 eo O

55 T-< O

55 l-H

Cd cd rH +3 +3

OS CS cd

B O 55

in X) o

55

lO

a r-N

0 a> CS

cd >. 0

N fj ee ■u •F"C ^j a cd

bio > >> 1 'S 3 u • f-4 ä s s H O 3 «s 3 0 O

w

a CO

o O u o

>>

CD > cj <

«2 CO be C

'S Ö

id CD

r—H

CO C O

"-S CO 0)

cr

S-,

3

CD >

Cfi O o- bß C

X H

CO Cfl CO r* o +J +J -*J +J © cd

CO

cfl CO CO

I* ■a in T3 m T3 TJ c o O O o t*H £ £ 2 2:

05 CO

2 m <M in CT> Cfl oo 05 r* T—i CO T—1 i-H CN L O F*H £

CO CO CO CO CO -M +J -^ -u C3S CO CO CO CO

£ o CO o T3 TJ T3 T3

O O o o £ £ £ fc

C8 CO CO cfl t» +J +J -M

s e i—i 1—1 o CO

T3 CO cfl CO

O O o o fc £ £ fc

to cfl

S £

i—i i—i -<* 1—1

co

O

!M m T—1

CO CO »o -u +J

2 CO t> in CO oq 1—1

CO XI o

CO

o

co CO CO CO ■^ -(-> +J +J +J

S ^ CD CO

oo 00

o o i-H

Cfl X!

CO CO CO T3

E O O o o HH £ z z £

-a >> c

es H £

CD >

0 O o o

Ü a w s

o <J

-M ^ O Ü CU <

co 3 o

O Q i

CO CO O D CO

«s bß o SH a

CO < ü w s-

cS CD ft >> >>

CO be Ö

fi

CO Ö o

•l-H

CO cu

00 c© CO o i—i

. 00 l-H

OS CM

o 05

CO CO

o l-H

CO l-H

CM oo OS 00 o

i>

oo l-H

o o GO »ft

a 0

-t-i

eö N

• PH

C S5 be

O

>> s

a» _> +3 ü <

CD

I CO CO cu

I? SH

<

n Ö o

• -H

C3

s 3

CO

o

03 T3

K5 CM 1—1

00 I-H 05 CN CM CM i—1

C cö s s o

"* Q* CN

I—1 CD

CO 10

00 T—"

LO CD 1—(

■*

Ü s-, o a £ >>

05 00 CD

CD CD 1—1

O 1—t

CO T—1 Tf

CU > •43 O

<3 0? CO CO 10 O 0 •* O

SH O « 0) a. & >>

CN O CD I-H O 0 O O

-D 03 be C -o

•1—<

C b s iC S fi 0) < s

,0 CO c > u O 0 %

0 0 Q W

0 "■S fc O 0 d, < CO 2

CO ü 0

0

H

CO <& O Q

S CO


Appendix Q: Citations of Negative Findings

Management Practice (MP) versus AR/DOD versus Regulatory Negative Find- ings by ECAS Program.

FY Active Army Army Reserve Army Guard

10/90 - 9/91 (FY91) No data 6 MPs No data

No data 12 AR/DOD No data

No data 1 Regulatory No data







10/93 - 9/94 (FY94) 217 MPs 163 MPs No data

575 AR/DOD 475 AR/DOD No data

1481 Regulatory 405 Regulatory No data

10/94 - 9/95 (FY95) 256 MPs 7 MPs No data



10/95 - 9/96 (FY96) 246 MPs 183 MPs No data



10/96 - 9/97 (FY97) 95 MPs 35 MPs OMPs


FT Active Army Army Reserve Army Guard

296 AR/DOD 91AR/DOD 145 AR/DOD

563 Regulatory 31 Regulatory 145 Regulatory

10/97-9/98 (FY98) 7MPs 18 MPs IMPs

17AR/DOD 43 AR/DOD 14 AR/DOD

40 Regulatory 30 Regulatory 50 Regulatory

10/98 - 9/99 (FY99) 170 MPs No data No data

341 AR/DOD No data No data

640 Regulatory No data No data

10.99 - 9/00 (FY00) 57 MPs No data No data

128AR/DOD No data No data

248 Regulatory No data No data


CERL Distribution

Chief of Engineers ATTN: CEHEC-IM-LH (2)

Engineer Research and Development Center (Libraries) ATTN ATTN ATTN

ERDC, Vicksburg, MS Cold Regions Research, Hanover, NH Topographic Engineering Center, Alexandria, VA

Defense Tech Info Center 22304 ATTN: DTIC-0

6 3/01

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated -o 3vc^.io ' nc'-r zer rescor.50 ncJucmg :he t;me 'or reviewing instructions, searching e<!s:inn ;ri data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection o* -nforpvit'o^ So^d :cmrron;s regarding :h;s bürde estimate or any other ascec: of this collection y nicr-vi this burden to Department of Defense. Washington Headaua-ters Se-v^os O-ev^-aio 'or !-fcrma':o,n Operat'cs and Reports (0704-0188). 1215 Jef'crscn Oavs Hir.v 4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other ofovs<on c' 'aw no po'icn shall be subiect :o any penalty for failing to comply with a coiiect'O" ;' "" valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS

-"Q and maintaining the '.ggnstions for 'educing Vmgton VA 22202-

■~-r no! display 3 current'y

1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYYY) 03-2001

2. REPORT TYPE

Final 3. DATES COVERED (From - To)

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE Environmental Compliance Assessment Data: Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's ECAS Program

5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S) Donna J. Schell

5d. PROJECT NUMBER 622720A896 5e. TASK NUMBER

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER T20

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) P.O. Box 9005 Champaign, IL 61826-9005

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER

ERDC/CERLTR-01-34

9. SPONSORING / MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 441 G Street, NW Washington, DC 20314-1000

10. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)

11. SPONSOR/MONITOR'S REPORT NUMBER(S)

12. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES Copies are available from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

14. ABSTRACT

The Active Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard have been conducting environmental compliance assessments since the late 1980s under the Environmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS). No analysis of the data generated to date had been done until the project reported here. This report summarizes the methodology used for an analysis of the data and the results ofthat analysis.

15. SUBJECT TERMS Environmental Compliance Assessment System (ECAS) Environmental Management

Environmental compliance checklists

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF:

a. REPORT Unclassified

b. ABSTRACT Unclassified

C. THIS PAGE Unclassified

17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

SAR

18. NUMBER OF PAGES

172

19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Donna J. Schell

19b.TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code)

(217)398-5544 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239.18

Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's EGAS Program - DTIC

Documents

Transcript of Analysis of Data Generated by the Army's EGAS Program - DTIC