rhetorical theory in american - OhioLINK ETD Center

367
RHETORICAL THEORY IN AMERICAN LEGAL PRACTICE DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Richard Davis Rieke, B .S., M. A, ****** The Ohio State University 1964 Approved by Adviser Department of Speech

Transcript of rhetorical theory in american - OhioLINK ETD Center

RH ETO RICAL THEORY IN AM ERICAN

LEG A L PR A C TIC E

DISSERTATION

P r e s e n te d in P a r t i a l F u lf il lm e n t of the R e q u ire m e n ts fo r the D e g re e D o cto r of P h ilo so p h y in the G rad u a te

School of The Ohio S tate U n iv e rs ity

By

R ic h a rd D avis R iek e , B . S . , M . A,

******

The Ohio S tate U n iv e rs ity 1964

A pproved by

A d v ise r D e p a rtm e n t of Speech

VITA

June 13, 1935 B orn--A lton, Illinois

1957 , , . , B. S . , Southern Illinois U niversity , Carbondale,Illinois

1957-1958. . Teaching A ssis tan t, D epartm ent of Speech, TheOhio State U niversity , Columbus, Ohio

1958 . . . . M. A ., The Ohio State U niversity , Columbus, Ohio

1958-1964. . In stru c to r, D epartm ent of Speech, The Ohio StateU niversity, Columbus, Ohio

PUBLICATIONS

"E arly Steps Tow ard the Unification of Speech and Psychology in the 20th Century, " C entral States Speech Journal, Vol. XII, No. 2, 1961, pp. 127-133,

FIELDS OF STUDY

M ajor F ield: Speech

Studies in R hetoric and Public A ddress, P ro fe sso rs P au l A, Carm ack, H arold F , Harding, W illiam E , U tterback, and W, Hayes Yeager

Studies in G eneral Communication. P ro fe sso rs F rank lin H. Knower, W allace C, (FotherIngham, and Keith Brooks

u

TA BLE O F CONTENTS

C h ap te r P ag e

I. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................1

O rig in s of R h e to r ic a l T heory in L eg a l P ra c t ic e C o n tem p o ra ry I n te r e s t in L eg a l R h e to ric a s E x p re s s e d

in the L i te r a tu r e C oncep ts R e lev a n t to the Study

R h e to r ic a l th eo ry L e g a l education

O rg an iza tio n of the R em ain d er of the Study

n . RH ETO RICA L IN FLU EN CES IN EARLY PROFESSIONA L

E D U C A T IO N ............................................................................................ 47

The In fluence of G re a t B r ita in P a th s to L e g a l E d u ca tio n in A m e ric a

The L aw SchoolP ro fe s s io n a l a s so c ia tio n s M oot c o u r ts and law clubs

P r a c t ic a l a s p e c ts of the law c u rr ic u lu m

III. CHARACTER O F RHETORICAL THEORY IN MODERN

LEG A L E D U C A T IO N .........................................................................90

Law O ffice v s . Law School The P r o p e r F u n c tio n of the Law School R ecogn ition of L eg a l R h e to ric in L aw School C u rr ic u la

O b je c tiv e s of p r a c t ic a l w ork in law schools C onten t of p r a c t ic a l c o u rse s

The id e a l p r a c t ic a l co u rseThe conduct of re p re s e n ta tiv e p r a c t ic e c o u rse s

P r e -L a w R e q u ire m e n ts

111

C h ap te r P ag e

IV. A LEG A L RHETO RIC OF PRA CTITIO N ERS . . . . 176

The P r e r e q u is i te s of th e S u ccessfu l A tto rneyIn te rv ie w s w ith a C lien tThe P re p a ra t io n of P le a d in g sG ath erin g and A rra n g in g E v id en ce B efo re T r ia lThe S e lec tio n of the Ju ryThe O pening S ta tem en tP re s e n ta t io n of E v idenceC ro s s -E xcuninationC losing A rg u m en tA p p e lla te A dvocacy

V. A PPRO A CH ES TO THE VALIDATION O F LEGAL

R H E T O R I C ......................................................................................... 298

L a w y e r-C lie n t In te rv ie w s E v id en ce in the T r ia l C o u rt

VI. SUMMARY AND C O N C L U S I O N S ....................................................341

B I B L I O G R A P H Y ................................................................................................... 351

IV

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

O rigins of R hetorical Theory in Legal P rac tice

Man*s attem pts to p re sc rib e standards of social behavior have

always n ecessita ted the establishm ent of sufficient authority to see that

the standards w ere followed. "While fo rce has always constitu ted one

efficient form of au thority , it has usually proved undesirab le fo r one

reason or ano ther. Thus, m an has sought a m ore desirab le substitute

fo r fo rce. The system s of law which have been the re su lt of th is search

have the problem of lacking lihe im m ediately apparent authority which is

p ossessed in ru le by fo rce . To avoid th is problem , early laws w ere

said to be the d ic ta tes of the gods, and as such even m ore powerful than

the force of m an against m an. The lead e rs w ere usually said to be

e ither gods them selves or appointed by the gods, and th e re fo re , the

word ot the lead er was law --absolute and subject to no appeal.

Under a system of absolute ru le by a divine lead er th ere was no

need for a m ethod of decision-m aking designed to d iscover a ra tional

b asis for securing belief. In ancient Egypt, fo r exam ple, the leader

w as sa id to be ap p o in ted by gods and h is w ord co n s titu ted th e law of the

co u n try . T h e re w as e s ta b lis h e d a c o u r t to c a r r y out the la w , b u t i ts

function w as s e v e re ly r e s t r i c te d by the co n s ta n t p re se n c e w ith in the

n a tio n of the m a k e r of la w s . A s a r e s u l t , th e re w ere no la w y e rs o r

p le a d e rs ; the ju d g e s a c te d bo th a s co u n se l and a r b i te r s . If a c itiz e n had

a co m p la in t to m a k e , he su b m itted i t in w ritin g to the c o u r t w h ich , in

tu rn , gave i t to the p e rs o n a g a in s t w hom th e co m p la in t w as d ire c te d .

T h is defenden t th en w ro te a re p ly . T h e re w as a tim e s e t a s id e d u ring

w hich w itn e s s e s cou ld com e fo r th and sp ea k to the ju d g es . A f te r th is ,

the c o u rt announced a d e c is io n . ^

The fu n c tio n of the c o u r t w as to in te r p r e t the w ill of the s o v e r ­

e ign . C le a r ly , th e c o u r t h ad only th a t d is c re t io n in m ak ing the

in te rp re ta t io n th a t the le a d e r chose to a llo w . T hus, in e f fe c t , the c o u rt

had no f re e d o m of in te rp re ta t io n a t a l l . L a te r , in the d ev e lo p m en t of

g o v ern m en t and law , th e d iv ine pow er of so v e re ig n s d im in ish e d and the

pow er of la w -m a k in g w as sp re a d am ong the n ob ility . T he ju d g m en ts

w hich had b een c o n s id e re d in s p ire d by god w ere c a r r ie d o v e r in the fo rm

of p re c e d e n ts to be u s e d by the c u r re n t ju d g e s .

In G re e c e , th e p o w er to g o vern and m ake law w as m u ch m o re

f re e ly d is tr ib u te d th a n h ad b een the c a se e a r l i e r . Solon, a m a n in v e s te d

w ith the p o w er to m ak e law , b ecam e m o s t in flu en tia l on th e dev elo p m en t

^H enry W. S co tt, The E vo lu tio n of L aw (New Y ork; The B o rd en P r e s s P u b lish in g C om pany, 1908), pp . 85 -9 2 .

of law in m any w ays. M o st p a r t ic u la r ly , w ith r e g a rd to the p re s e n t

study , he w ro te law s in p u rp o se ly am biguous language so a s to give

g re a te r d is c re tio n of in te rp re ta t io n to the ju d g e s . Solon in ten d ed h is

law s to be ap p lied a c c o rd in g to th e ir s p ir i t r a th e r than th e ir le t t e r . I t

could be ex p ec ted th a t to the ex ten t th a t the ju d g m en t of the c o u rt w as

given g r e a te r f re e d o m in se le c tio n of p r in c ip le s fo r d e c is io n to th a t

ex ten t g r e a te r e m p h as is w ould be p la c e d upon the m ethod by w hich the

d e c is io n of the c o u rt w as re ac h e d .

I t i s no t su rp r is in g th a t sh o rtly a f te r the tim e of Solon the f i r s t

ev idence of the ex is te n c e of a group of m e n - - s k i l le d in p e r s u a s io n - -

'3a c tin g a s ad v o ca tes b e fo re the c o u r ts i s found. D em o sth en es is the

m o s t no ted of th e se m en .

I t i s re a so n ab le th a t so long a s th e re w as l i t t le o r no co n ce rn fo r

the m an n e r by w hich ju d g es m ade d e c is io n s th e re w as no in te r e s t in the

study of the th eo ry of ju d ic ia l d ec is io n -m a k in g . H ow ever, a s soon a s a

g roup of ad v o ca tes o r p le a d e r s a ro se who engaged in the re g u la r p r e s e n ­

ta tio n of c a s e s b e fo re the c o u r ts i t w as only to be ex p ec ted th a t m en

w ould becom e in te re s te d in re a so n s why som e ad v o ca te s w ere m o re

su c c e ss fu l in w inning c a s e s than o th e rs ; o r , why ju d g e s found ju s tic e

re s id in g in one p o s itio n r a th e r than the o th e r .

^I b id . , p . 112. ^I b id . , p . 116.

The s y s te m of ju r is p ru d e n c e w hich had grow n f ro m the m o st

an c ien t t im e s in vo lved p ro c e s s e s w hich seem to have evo lved n a tu ra lly

f ro m a s itu a tio n of conflic t: one m a n a s s e r te d a c h a rg e and an o th e r m an

a s s e r te d a c o n tra ry p o s itio n . E a c h a ttem p ted to p r e s e n t h is p o s itio n in

such a way a s to show th a t t ru th and ju s tic e w ere w ith h im . The judge

h e a rd o r re a d th e se s ta te m e n ts and decided who w as on the side of law .

T h is w as the c a s e in an c ien t E g y p t, w hich is about a s f a r b ack a s u se fu l

h is to ry in th is a r e a h a s g o n e . A s the freed o m of the ju d g es in c re a s e d ,

th e re fo re , m o re and m o re a tte n tio n w as given to the m a n n e r in w hich

the lit ig a n ts p re s e n te d th e ir p o s itio n s fo r a rb i tr a t io n .

W hile th e re i s re a so n to b e liev e th a t m any p e r s o n s m ade an

e ffo rt to le a r n m o re about the p r o c e s s of ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m a k in g , t r a ­

d ition h a s i t th a t C o rax w as the f i r s t to se t down fo rm a l p r in c ip le s u n d er

the nam e of rh e to r ic o r the a r t of p e rsu a s io n . ^ I t i s A r is to t le , h o w ev er,

who is g e n e ra lly c re d ite d w ith p re se n tin g the m o s t sy s te m a tic and

in flu en tia l d isc u s s io n of rh e to r ic , and i ts re la tio n to the leg a l p ro c e s s .

A r is to tle saw the ta sk of ju d ic ia l d ec is io n -m ak in g a s s im ila r to the

le g is la tiv e p o licy -m ak in g s itu a tio n b u t y e t re q u ir in g som e d is tin c tio n s in

the a p p lica tio n of the r h e to r ic a l p r in c ip le s . T hat i s to say , he b e liev ed

% i d . ,5

B ro m le y Sm ith , "C o ra x and P ro b a b ili ty , " The Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of Speech E d u c a tio n , VII (F e b ru a ry , 1921), pp. 13-14 .

th a t the sam e s y s te m a tic p r in c ip le s of rh e to r ic ap p lied to bo th s itu a tio n s ,

b u t the le g a l s itu a tio n d em anded c o n tro l in the u se of p ro o fs .

I t is u se fu l to e la b o ra te upon A r i s to t le 's th eo ry of the le g a l p r o ­

c e s s b ec au se h is th e o ry c o n s titu te s a su b s ta n tia l in tro d u c tio n to the

p ro b le m of the p r e s e n t s tudy . A r is to t le v iew ed the p ro c e s s of app ly ing

p r in c ip le s of law to sp e c ific l i t ig a n ts a s a rh e to r ic a l p ro c e s s . To

A r is to t le , f u r th e r , r h e to r ic invo lved the d isc o v e ry of the a v a ila b le

m e a n s of p e rsu a s io n ; an d to h im , the v e ry h e a r t of p e rs u a s io n w as the

dev elo p m en t of lo g ic a l a rg u m e n t th ro u g h the m ed iu m of the en th y m em e

o r r h e to r ic a l sy llo g ism a s he c a lle d i t . ^ He th u s th e o r iz e d th a t m an i s

b o th capab le and d e s iro u s of m ak ing ra t io n a l d e c is io n s . In co n n ec tio n

w ith th is , A r is to tle ad v an ced the id ea th a t t ru th and ju s tic e w ere

n a tu ra lly in c lin ed to p r e v a i l o v e r th e i r o p p o s ite s , and th u s , if p e r s u a s io n

w e re given a chance to d is c o v e r a l l the p ro o fs av a ilab le in the p a r t ic u la r

s itu a tio n the ou tcom e w ould n e c e s s a r i ly be a tru e and ju s t one. ^ If an

u n ju s t d ec is io n w e re m a d e , sa id A r is to t le , i t w as s im p ly b e c a u se the

d e fen d e r of the p ro p e r side fa ile d to d is c o v e r a l l the av a ilab le m e a n s of

p e rs u a s io n .

I t fo llow s f ro m th is th e o ry th a t in the c o u rt of law w hat i s n eed ed

i s a n opportun ity fo r the p a r t ie s in the l i t ig a tio n to be given fu ll

^W. R hys R o b e r ts , " R h e to r ic a , " in T he W orks of A r is to t le , W. D. R o ss (e d ,) , (O xford: The C la ren d o n P r e s s , 1946), XI, p . 1354a.

^ Ib id . , p . 1355a.

op p o rtu n ity to d isc o v e r and s e t fo r th the av a ilab le m e a n s of p e rsu a s io n .

W ith th is , th e judge (in th is w o rd A r is to tle a lso in c lu d ed a ju ry ) w ould

a r r iv e a t a p ro p e r d ec is io n . H ow ever, b e c a u se of the unique a s p e c ts of

the le g a l s itu a tio n , A r is to t le f e l t som e ad d itio n a l c o n tro l w as c a lle d fo r

in the c o u r t. He a rg u e d th is w ay. In the n o b le r e n d e av o r of le g is la tiv e

p o licy -m ak in g the p a r t ic ip a n ts w e re bo th d e b a te r s and ju d g e s . T h a t i s ,

the p e r s o n s p re s e n tin g th e p ro o fs w ere a lso the p e r s o n s judging th em .

The p o licy -m a k e r s n e c e s s a r i ly had a v ita l in v o lv em en t in the ou tcom e

of th e d e c is io n -m a k in g p r o c e s s fo r the p o licy w ould be th e i r s and w ould

a ffe c t th e ir a c tio n s . T h u s , if a p e r s u a d e r u sed a s p ro o f ap p e a ls

d ire c te d no t to w ard the i s s u e b u t the m en d ec id in g i t (such a s a ro u s in g

of p re ju d ic e , p ity , a n g e r , e t c . ) the ju d g es w ould, by v ir tu e of th e ir

p e rs o n a l in v o lv em en t in the o u tco m e , s t i l l m ak e a n en lig h ten ed and

p ro p e r d e c is io n . T h is w as n o t the c a se in the c o u r t, A r is to tle c la im ed .

On the c o n tra ry , in the c o u r t the judge o r ju ry w as c a lle d upon to decide

a p ro b le m w hich w as of v i ta l in te r e s t to o th e r p e r s o n s u n re la te d to the

ju d g es . T he c o u r t h ad no in v o lv em en t in the ou tco m e of the c o n tro v e rsy ,

only the l i t ig a n ts . In fa c t, j u r i e s w ere sp e c if ic a lly s e le c te d on the

b a s is of th e ir ig n o ra n ce of th e p e rs o n s o r p ro b le m s b e fo re the c o u r t.

T h u s , sa id A r is to t le , th e lik e lih o o d th a t ju d g es w ould d ec id e on the

b a s is of a p p e a ls i r r e le v a n t to the is s u e s w as in c re a s e d . F o r in s ta n c e ,

a s a ju ry i s h e a r in g a rg u m e n ts abou t a p ro b le m w hich h a s no in te r e s t to

th em they a r e m o re lik e ly to v iew the p ro b le m in lig h t of th e ir own f e e l ­

in g s and be sw ayed by the m o s t p leas in g and p la u s ib le sp e a k e r, and thus

choose be tw een the l i t ig a n ts on the b a s is of w hich se e m s the m o s t

a t t r a c t iv e . T h is , d e c la re d A r is to t le , co n s titu te d choice and no t ju d g m en t

and could e a s ily h appen w hen the ju ry h ad no s tak e in the outcom e of the

d e c is io n -m a k in g p r o c e s s .

In add ition to the p ro b le m ju s t s ta te d , the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s a lso

su ffe re d f ro m the n eed to m ake im m ed ia te d e c is io n s a s opposed to the

o p p o rtu n ity fo r c a lm d e lib e ra tio n in the le g is la tiv e a sse m b ly .

In re sp o n se to th e se conditions of the le g a l s itu a tio n , A r is to tle

th e o r iz e d th a t i t w as p o s s ib le to reg u la te the rh e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of the

l i t ig a tio n in such a w ay a s to in su re (or a t le a s t m o re n e a r ly a s s u re ) th a t

the ju d g es would dec id e on the b a s is of sound ju d g m en t. S p ec ifica lly ,

A r is to t le a g re e d w ith a lre a d y e s ta b lish e d p r a c t ic e s of the c o u rts to

exclude any p ro o fs c o n s id e re d i r r e le v a n t to the r e a l is s u e s of the c a s e o r

lik e ly to d is t r a c t the ju d g m en t of the c o u rt f ro m the i s s u e s . The th e o ry

w as th a t the ju d g es cou ld not b a se th e ir d e c is io n on im p ro p e r p ro o fs if

they w e re exposed to none.

A r is to tle f u r th e r re a so n e d th a t if the p o lic ie s of the le g is la tiv e

a s se m b ly w ere m o re lik e ly to be sound than th o se of the c o u r t, th en the

law s of the a s se m b ly should be a s ex ten siv e and sp ec ific a s p o ss ib le so

a s to rem o v e a s m u ch of the d ec is io n -m ak in g p ro c e s s f ro m the c o u r t a s

p o s s ib le . T h a t i s , the c o u r t faced two sp ec ific ta sk s : (1) to d e te rm in e

8

the fa c ts of the sp e c ific ca se b e fo re the co u rt; (2) to d e te rm in e the a p p li­

c a tio n of the law to th o se fa c ts . C le a r ly , s ta te d A r is to t le , the a s se m b ly

cou ld not be ex p ec ted to le g is la te fo r each sp ec ific c a s e , so the c o u rt

w ould a lw ays be n eed ed to d e te rm in e fa c ts . H ow ever, the a s se m b ly

cou ld so s e t fo rth th e law a s to m ake i t s a p p lica tio n to fa c ts c le a r in

m o s t c a s e s . T h is , in e ffec t, a s su m ed th a t p r in c ip le s of law cou ld be

s ta te d in such language a s to rem o v e the d is c re tio n of the judge in d e te r ­

m in in g ap p lica tio n to g iven fa c ts . T h is a ssu m p tio n r e s t s upon a th e o ry

s im i la r to the one above; the fa c to rs w hich m ove judges (including

ju r ie s ) to decide w h a t i s fa c t in a given c o n tro v e rsy and then to dec ide

how the law is to b e ap p lied to the fa c ts can b e so re g u la te d a s to m ak eg

the ju d g e 's d e c is io n p re d ic ta b ly ra tio n a l.

Two co n c lu s io n s m ay be draw n f ro m th is d isc u ss io n of A r i s to t l e 's

th e o r ie s . F i r s t , A r is to t le c le a r ly b a s e d h is th e o ry of ju r is p ru d e n c e

upon an a ssu m p tio n of a cap ac ity w ith in m an fo r ra tio n a l d e c is io n -m a k in g

a s opposed to d e c is io n s founded upon n o n -ra tio n a l b a s e s such a s p ity and

p re ju d ic e . Second, A r is to tle v iew ed the p ro c e s s of ju d ic ia l d e c is io n ­

m ak in g a s e s s e n t ia l ly a rh e to r ic a l one. T h a t i s , a ssu m in g the law is

g iv en , i t w as the du ty of the litig a n ts to d isc o v e r the av a ilab le m e a n s of

p e r s u a s io n (that i s , th e sum to ta l of p o ss ib le p roofs) to b r in g the ju d g es

to b e liev e in the t r u th o r ju s tic e of one cau se over the o th e r , w ith in the

®Ibid.

co n tex t of r e s t r i c t io n s on the u se of p ro o fs c o n s id e re d to ap p ea l to the

n o n -ra tio n a l m o tiv e s of the ju d g e s . To A r is to t le , the en th y m em e w as

the p r im e v eh ic le of p ro o f in fo re n s ic p e rs u a s io n ju s t a s i t w as to h im in

a l l rh e to r ic a l s itu a tio n s .

C o n tem p o ra ry I n te r e s t in L e g a l R h e to ric a s E3q>ressed

in the L i te r a tu re

W ith the b ack g ro u n d of the th e o r ie s of A r is to t le , i t s e e m s r e a ­

sonable to m ove to m o d e rn A m e ric a n le g a l p r a c t ic e and in q u ire two

th in g s:

1) I s th e re re a s o n to b e lie v e th a t an in te r e s t in the r h e to r ic a l

a s p e c ts of the law co n tin u es in the U nited S ta te s?

2) H ave s c h o la rs of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry m ade th o ro u g h study of the

r h e to r ic of the law ?

If th e re is s t i l l a s tro n g ly r h e to r ic a l e le m e n t in the a d m in is tra t io n of law

i t cou ld be ex p ec ted th a t m e m b e rs of the le g a l p ro fe s s io n w ould be

in te re s te d in i t and th a t rh e to r ic a l s c h o la rs w ould study i t . B e fo re any

fu r th e r in v e s tig a tio n in the a r e a is u n d e r ta k e n --w h ic h i s p ro p o se d in th is

s tu d y - - i t s e e m s n e c e s s a ry to in v e s tig a te th e se two q u e s tio n s .

The m o s t r e c e n t te s tim o n y f ro m the le g a l p ro fe s s io n w ith re g a rd

to the rh e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of law w as g iven a t the 1959 C o n feren ce on

L e g a l E d u ca tio n . B etw een the 15th and 18th of Ju n e , 1959, le g a l s c h o la rs ,

p r a c t i t io n e r s , educatbat»». and no ted r e p re s e n ta t iv e s of o th e r d isc ip lin e s

10

gathered in Ann A rb or, M ichigan to participate in the 1959 C onference on

L egal Education. P r o fe s so r C harles W. Joiner of the U n iversity of

M ichigan Law School detected an im portant them e that w as to com e from

the conference in h is opening ad d ress when he said .

F i r s t an d fo re m o s t fjthe la w y e r] w ill continue to b e a h a r d - h ead ed ad v o ca te an d co u n se lo r; he m u s t con tinue to be an a c c u ra te , c le a r an d c a re fu l th in k e r , a r t ic u la te in the p re se n ta tio n of id e a s , bo th to h is c lie n t and to the c o u rts and trib u n a ls*

He no ted th a t the la w y e r w ill r e ly on th eo ry m o re and p re c e d e n t le s s in

dev elo p m en t of c a s e s and in g iving ad v ice . P r o f e s s o r J o in e r w as co n ­

c e rn e d w ith the p r e - le g a l tra in in g of the law y e r; he d id not ap p ro v e of

" re g im e n tin g th e p r e - la w s tu d en t into c o u r s e s . " "H ow ever, " h e w ent on

to say , "we m u s t dem an d ex ce llen ce be p ro v e d b e fo re e n te r in g in the

study of law . " The e x c e lle n c e w ith which he w as co n ce rn ed w as d iv ided

in to two p a r t s : " 1) We m u s t have m o re p ro o f of sk ill in co m m u n ica tio n .

2) We m u s t d em an d p ro o f of a b ility to an a ly ze an d th ink in dep th about a

d ifficu lt p ro b le m , R o ss L . M alone, then p r e s id e n t of the A m e ric a n

B a r . A s so c ia tio n , su p p o rte d P r o fe s s o r J o in e r 's in te r e s t in the p r e - le g a l

tra in in g b e in g o b ta in ed . W hile i t i s t ru e , he n o ted , th a t good la w y e rs

have com e f ro m a l l s o r t s of back g ro u n d in v inderg raduate study , " i t i s

no p ro o f a t a l l th a t th e m an w o u ld n 't have b een a b e t te r law y er h ad he h ad

9The Tw elfth Annual Summ er Institute of L ega l Education, The Law Schools Look A head, 1959 C onference on L ega l Education (Ann A rbor, M ich ., 1959.

^°Ibid., p. 45. ^ % id . , p. 51

11

the b e n e fit of p re - le g a l tra in in g w hich w as d es ig n e d a t le a s t to im p ro v e

h is sk ills of com m im ication . " "I hope, " he concluded , " th a t the confe-

12re n c e is going to give som e fu r th e r thought to d e c is io n s in th is a r e a . "

A n o th e r m em b er of the law facu lty of the U n iv e rs ity of M ich ig an --

Luke K. C ooper r id e r - -c o m m e n te d upon the o b je c tiv e s of p ro fe s s io n a l

le g a l ed u ca tio n " in the b ro a d e s t te r m s . "

L aw school m u s t t r a in the s tuden t in the la w y e r’s tech n iq u es w ith h is m a te r ia ls , a t the le v e l of p re d ic tio n and advocacy . R e fe re n c e , h e re , i s to som eth ing o th e r than the ’c a se a n a ly s is ' te ch n iq u es w hich we d r i l l in to our s tu d en ts in the tra d it io n a l caseb o o k c o u rs e s . The exchange w hich g o es on in the c la s s ro o m in such c o u rs e s i s v e ry la rg e ly d r i l l in the handling of id e a s , of a b s tr a c t io n s , r a th e r th an in the handling of m a te r ia ls , by w hich I m ean the le g a l m a te r ia ls , c a s e s , s ta tu te s , re g u la tio n s , e t c . , w hich a r e o r m ay be re le v a n t in p a r t ic u la r lit ig a tio n a l o r p o te n ­t ia l ly l i tig a tio n a l s itu a tio n s . The la t te r type of tra in in g o u r s tu d en ts re c e iv e only on a h ap h a z a rd b a s is . M oot c o u r t i s an a p p ro a c h , b u t is thought of a s beyond the c u r r ic u lu m , hence goes w ithout p ro p e r su p e rv is io n , and the e x p e r ie n c e w hich the studen t g e ts f ro m i t is low in q u a lity , qu ite in su ff ic ie n t, and p e rh a p s m is le a d in g . P ro b le m s have b een in c o rp o ra te d in som e c o u rse s , w hich i s c e r ta in ly fo r th e good, b u t they u su a lly p ro c e e d upon the a ssu m p tio n th a t the s tu d en t a lre a d y know s the fund am en ta ls of how to d e r iv e a p re d ic tio n o r an a rg u m e n t f ro m le g a l m a te r ia ls , and tlia t a l l th a t r e m a in s to be done is to open up an opportun ity fo r p r a c t ic e . T h is a ssu m p tio n is p ro b ab ly unsound a s to the m a jo r i ty of s tu d en ts . T he P ro b le m s and R e s e a rc h c o u rse s a r e a g r e a t s te p fo rw a rd , b u t we n eed to re co g n ize th a t the function w hich th e y seek to p e r fo rm is one of the p r im e functions of the law sch o o l, and d e s e rv e s to be t re a te d v e ry s e r io u s ly , not a s a side is s u e . The w ay a law y er h an d les a s ta tu te o r c a se p re c e d e n t in p re p a r in g a b r ie f o r opinion is qu ite d iffe re n t f ro m the w ay the sam e c a s e o r s ta tu te i s h an d led in a tra d it io n a l law school c la s s , and the tra d it io n a l c a se d r i l l i s of l i t t le a s s is ta n c e in le a rn in g th a t tech n iq u e . S till, i t i s a technique w hich can be taugh t in a r e la t iv e ly sh o rt a llo c a tio n of t im e , and c e r ta in ly does not re q u ire th re e y e a r s of d r i l l .

IZ lb id . , p . 71. 1 3 lb id ., pp. 119-120.

12

Speaking bo th a s a p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y and a s the B a r E x a m in e r of D e tro it,

M ich igan , T hom as H, A dam s in d ica te d th a t " r e g a rd le s s of the ch an g es in

d ire c tio n w hich the su b stan tiv e law m ay take we m ay a ssu m e th a t fo r

m an y y e a r s to com e the p r in c ip a l sk ill w hich a law y e r w ill re q u ire i s the

a b ili ty to co m m u n ica te . I t is t r u e , he n o te s , th a t th e re w ill r e m a in

o c c a s io n s in w hich a law y er n eed s only the know ledge of the law and the

a b ility to app ly i t to a g iven s e t of fa c ts and com e fo r th w ith an opin ion a s

to w h e th e r o r no t a c o u rse of ac tio n m ay be leg a lly u n d e rtak en , "M uch

m o re o ften , h o w ev er, i t i s n e c e s s a ry th a t the la w y e r be ab le to s a tis fy

som eone e ls e of the soundness of h is c o n c lu s io n ," " T h is ," A dam s s a y s ,

"he can only do if he i s ab le to s ta te h is p o s itio n in a m an n e r w hich o th e rs

m ay e a s ily u n d ers tan d ,

M ore sp ec ific a lly , A dam s n o te s th a t f ro m the tim e the young la w ­

y e r ta k e s h is b a r ex am in a tio n to h is f i r s t in te rv ie w w ith a c lie n t o r a

p ro sp e c tiv e em p lo y e r, h is f i r s t o ra l a rg u m en t o r w r itte n b r ie f , "he w ill

be co n fro n ted w ith the p ro b le m of se llin g h im se lf o r h is p o s itio n to an

a u d ito r w ish ing to u n d e rs ta n d b u t too busy to c o n s id e r and re c o n s id e r a

s ta te m e n t in an a ttem p t to give lo g ic a l m ean ing to an ap p a ren tly i l lo g ic a l

s ta te m e n t, The a u d ito r w ill f re q u e n tly be one who is not t ra in e d in

law . T hen , when d isc u ss in g w ith a c lie n t a p r a c t ic a l co u rse of a c tio n ,

i t i s n e c e s s a ry fo r the law y er to be ab le to co m m u n ica te the b a s is of h is

^ % id . , p . 154. ^^Ibid. ^ ^ Ib id ., p , 155.

13

opin ion in such a w ay th a t the c lie n t u n d e rs ta n d s and a p p re c ia te s it; the

c l ie n t m u s t u n d e rs ta n d the le g a l a s p e c ts invo lved in the s itu a tio n in o rd e r

to know w hat fa c ts the law y er need s to b eg in to fo rm an opin ion , A dam s

e m p h a s iz ed in h is sp eech th a t teach ing co m m u n ica tio n i s the job of both

the u n d e rg ra d u a te schoo l and the law schoo l. He n o te s th a t now n e ith e r

i s doing the job:

The a b ility to com m u n ica te c le a r ly (and inc lu d ed in co m m u n ­ica tio n is the a r t of red u c in g to w o rd s the a g re e m e n t of two p e rs o n s so th a t in the fu tu re th o se p e r s o n s and o th e rs w ill know w hat th a t a g re e m e n t w as) is a s im p o rta n t , if no t m o re im p o rta n t to a law y e r, than know ledge of ru le s of law . R u les of law w ill change d u rin g the p e r io d of p r a c t ic e b u t the a r t of and n e c e s s ity fo r co m m u n ica tio n w ill no t.

The law schoo l should not give i t s d e g re e o r s tam p of a p p ro v a l to any s tu d en t who does n o t have th is a b ili ty to a s a tis fa c to ry d e g re e .

T h is co m m u n ica tiv e sk ill should be developed b e fo re a d m iss io n to law schoo l. M uch of such co m m u n ica tiv e sk ill i s no t p e c u lia r to the law and can b e s t be taught o u tsid e a le g a l en v iro n m en t.The law sch o o ls should , th e re fo re , b r in g w hat p r e s s u r e they can , to b e a r upon th e i r re sp e c tiv e u n d e rg ra d u a te sch o o ls to p lac e m o re e m p h a s is upon th is ab ility .

In a d m ittin g a p p lic a n ts the law schoo l should a t the l e a s t be s a tis f ie d th a t the a p p lic a n t p ro b ab ly w ill be ab le to a c q u ire th is sk ill . F o r th o se a p p lic a n ts who do no t have the a b ili ty su ffic ien tly d eveloped the law sch o o ls should h av e , and re q u ire the s tu d en ts to ta k e , a c o u rse to develop th is sk ill . T h is c o u rse should be tau g h t w ithou t p r im a r y em p h as is on law o r s o -c a l le d 'le g a l w ritin g . * A fte r the s tu d en t h a s a c q u ire d a b a s ic co m m u n ica tiv e a b ility i s su ffic ien t tim e to s p e c ia liz e in 'le g a l w r itin g . ' The fa c t th a t m any s tu d e n ts w ith law re v ie w e x p e rien ce s t i l l do not have the co m m u n ica tiv e sk ill d e m o n s tra te s th a t m e re 'le g a l w riting* i s not su ffic ien t. N e ith e r the w ritin g of a c o n tra c t n o r a p le a to a ju ry i s 'le g a l w ritin g . *

The law sch o o ls m u s t th e m se lv e s a s su m e the re sp o n s ib il i ty fo r teach in g the co m m u n ica tio n 's sk ill u n til such tim e a s the u n d e rgra d u a te sch o o ls do th e ir job in th is r e s p e c t .

17ibid., p . 156.

14

A t th is p o in t, p e rh a p s i t i s w e ll to note th a t the 1959 C onference

on L e g a l E d u ca tio n h e ld a t the U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan w as not devo ted to

the p ro b le m of co m m u n ica tio n tra in in g fo r law s tu d e n ts . In sp ite of the

a p p a re n t c o n s is te n c y w ith w hich th is p ro b le m w as r a i s e d by the p a r t i c i ­

p a n ts , th is co n fe ren c e w as d es ig n ed to d is c u s s a l l the p ro b le m s fac in g

le g a l ed u ca tio n in the y e a r s to co m e. E a ch su p p o r te r independen tly

s e le c te d co m m u n ica tio n a s the p o in t to be s t r e s s e d . E a ch p a r tic ip a n t

in d ep en d en tly cam e to th is co n fe ren ce a lre a d y c o n c e rn e d w ith the p ro b le m .

A dded to th is f a c t is the r e a l iz a t io n th a t th e se p a r t ic ip a n ts re p re s e n te d

law sch o o ls a l l o v e r the U n ited S ta te s - -n o t one p a r t ic u la r type of schoo l

n o r one se c tio n of the n a tio n ,

T h o m as M , C o lley , D ean of the School of L aw of the U n iv e rs ity

of P it ts b u rg h , s u m m a riz e d the op in ions a s to th e im p o rta n c e of co m m u n ­

ica tio n to law w hen he s ta te d , " the law , is above ev ery th in g e ls e , a

co m m u n ica tin g p ro fe s s io n , " He sa id fu r th e r , "no law school can p re te n d

th a t i t i s tu rn in g out g ra d u a te s f i t to e n te r the p r a c t ic e w hen i t know s

18th a t th e i r co m m u n ica tio n f a c i l i t ie s a re a l l bu t n o n e x is te n t, "

The p a r t ic ip a n ts in th is co n fe re n c e , a f te r l is te n in g to the opening

sp e e c h e s w hich have b een d is c u s s e d above, n ex t w ent in to d isc u ss io n

g ro u p s fo r c lo s e r study of the p ro b le m s facinjg le g a l edu ca tio n . V ir tu a lly

e v e ry g roup c o n se n su s d is c u s s e d a t one po in t o r a n o th e r - -u s u a lly f i r s t - -

the p ro b le m of teach in g co m m u n ica tio n s k ills . To be s u re , m any w ere

18The L aw S chools L ook A head , op, c i t , , p , 166,

15

c o n ce rn ed only w ith le g a l w ritin g ; m any w ere co n ce rn ed w ith the e n tire

q u es tio n of p r a c t ic a l t ra in in g in law schoo ls; m any w e re co n cern ed with

the re la tio n sh ip of re sp o n s ib il i ty betw een the u n d e rg ra d u a te college and

the law school; b u t a l l w e re co n ce rn ed in one way o r a n o th e r w ith the

co m m u n ica tio n n eed s of the law y er and the p ro b le m of sa tis fy in g them .

The fin a l c o n se n su s , e n titled "T he Role of the L aw School in

D eveloping a L a w y er, " m ad e th is s ta tem en t:

The p ro b le m s fac in g so c ie ty re su ltin g fro m ra p id grow th of tech n o lo g ica l know ledge, th e in c re a s in g ra p id ity of tra n sp o r ta tio n an d co m m u n ica tio n , the la r g e r n u m b ers of p e r s o n s liv ing c lo s e r and c lo s e r to g e th e r , and the m o b ility of p e o p le , ind ica te th a t a l l la w y e rs w h e re v e r they w ill p ra c tic e n eed b ro a d know­led g e and cap ac ity . T o m o rro w 's law y er w ill n eed g r e a te r know ledge of, and a p p re c ia tio n fo r , the leg a l and so c ia l p ro b le m s of a l l p eo p le of th e w orld ; know ledge of, and a p p re ­c ia tio n fo r , the im p a c t of the tech n o lo g ica l ad v an ces on p eo p le s ; and the ca p a c ity to desig n and o p e ra te th e le g a l and so c ia l m a c h in e ry to m ak e th is com plex w orld , s ta te o r c ity , o p e ra te in p eace and in a c co rd an ce w ith law . The fu tu re w ill a lso c a ll fo r the sam e c a re fu l th in k e r , c lie n t c a r e ta k e r , and ad vocate so n e c e s s a ry today ,

The c o n se n su s w ent on to say , "T he law schoo ls have a r ig h t to dem and

of th e i r a p p lic an ts the c a p a c ity to re a d and u n d e rs ta n d , to o rg an ize , c o m ­

p o se , w r ite and speak e ffec tiv e E n g lish . " I t no tes th a t " the w ritte n and

spoken w ord a r e the la w y e r 's to o ls and they m u s t be s h a rp . " With

r e g a rd to the re la tiv e re sp o n s ib il i ty of co lleg es and law schoo ls in f i l l ­

ing th is need , the c o n se n su s s a y s , "the law schoo ls shou ld not ad m it

th o se who do no t m e e t s ta n d a rd s of p ro fic ien cy in co m m unica tion

1 9 lb id ., p . 5.

16

p r e s c r ib e d by th em . The law sch o o ls , on the o th e r hand , m u s t te a ch the

stu d en t to app ly to the law h is a b ili ty to com m unica te and m u s t dem and of

20h im q u a lity r e s e a r c h in depth and e ffec tiv e w ritin g on le g a l m a t te r s , "

F in a lly , the c o n sen su s n o tes th a t "the u n d e rg ra d u a te c o lle g e s n eed m o re

a s s is ta n c e th an is being g iven a t the p r e s e n t tim e in ad v is in g p r e - la w

s tu d e n ts . " W hile the p a r t ic ip a n ts s tro n g ly r e je c te d the id ea of p r e s c r ib e d

c o u rse s in co lleg e fo r those p re p a r in g to e n te r law schoo l, they did fe e l

th a t " s tu d e n ts should be ad v ise d th a t s tu d ie s in the a r t s and sc ie n c e s

should be p u rsu e d w hich w ill p ro d u ce (a) a b ro a d c u ltu ra l b ack g ro u n d , (b)

h a b its of th o ro u g h n e ss , in te l le c tu a l c u r io s ity and s c h o la rsh ip , and (c) the

ab ility to o rg a n iz e m a te r ia ls and com m u n ica te the r e s u l ts o ra lly and in

w ritin g ,

The te s tim o n y fro m the C o n feren ce on L eg a l E d u ca tio n su p p o rts

two te n ta tiv e co n c lu s io n s . F i r s t , th e re s e e m s to be no doubt th a t m e m ­

b e r s of the le g a l p ro fe s s io n in th e U nited S ta te s continue w ith an in te r e s t

in the r h e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of le g a l p r a c t ic e . Second, the te s tim o n y is

e x p re s s e d in such a way a s to su g g est confusion o y er the c h a ra c te r of

the rh e to r ic of law . C e rta in ly , the w ord " rh e to r ic " i s no lo n g e r u se d to

c h a ra c te r iz e the p ro b le m a r e a , and th e re se em s to be no d is tin c tio n

b e tw een g ra m m a r and o th e r e le m e n ta ry a s p e c ts of language and rh e to r ic

a s w as m ad e in the tim e of the a n c ie n ts .

2 ° Ib id . , p . 6. ^ % i d . , p . 7.

17

To le a rn w h e th e r o r no t r h e to r ic a l s c h o la rs have m ade a thorough

study of the rh e to r ic of the le g a l p r o c e s s a study of the l i te r a tu r e h a s

b een m ad e .

The H is to ry of Speech E d u ca tio n in A m e r ic a , p u b lish ed in 1954

u n d e r the a u sp ic e s of the Speech A s so c ia tio n of A m e r ic a , m a k e s no

re fe re n c e to a tte m p ts b y law sch o o ls to p ro v id e sp eech ed u ca tio n o r of

22 „la w y e rs and p o te n tia l la w y e rs to s e c u re i t , A f u r th e r ex am in a tio n of

the sc h o la r ly w o rk done by the f ie ld of sp eech w as m ade th ro u g h study of

T hons sen . F a th e r son , and T hons sen . B ib lio g rap h y of Speech E d u c a tio n ;

the supp lem en t to th a t w ork;^ '^ the Index to T he Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of

S peech ;^^ the T ab le of C o n ten ts of The Q u a r te r ly Jo u rn a l of Speech ,

2 2 K arl R . W allace (ed. ), H is to ry of Speech E d u c a tio n in A m e ric a , Speech A sso c ia tio n of A m e r ic a (New Y ork : A p p le to n -C e n tu ry -C ro f ts , I n c . , 1954).

23L e s te r Thons sen , E liz a b e th F a th e r son , and D o ro th ea T hons sen (com p. ), B ib lio g rap h y of Speech E d u c a tio n (New Y ork: T he H. W. W il­son C om pany, 1939).

^ '^ L este r Thons se n , M ary M a rg a re t R obb, and D o ro th ea T hons sen (com p. ), B ib lio g rap h y of Speech E d u ca tio n Supplem ent: 1939-1948 (New Y ork: The H. W. W ilson C om pany, 1950).

25 G ile s W ilke son G ray (com p. ), In d ex to The Q u a r te r ly Jo u rn a l of Speech V o lum es I to XL 1915-1954 (D ubuque, Iow a: W m. C. B row n Com pany P u b l is h e r s , 1956).

18

Speech M onographs^ and T he Speech T e a c h e r ;^^ G rad u a te T h e se s An

Index of G rad u a te W ork in S peech . T h ese r e fe r e n c e s y ie ld ed the

co n c lu s io n th a t s tu d en ts in sp eech have b een in te r e s te d in s tu d ie s of the

speak ing of in d iv id u a l la w y e rs , b u t have b een l i t t le co n ce rn ed w ith the

teach in g of sp eech in le g a l ed u ca tio n ,

A b r ie f re v iew of the p u b lic a tio n s w hich have b e en p ro d u c e d

re le v a n t to the re la tio n sh ip of sp eech to le g a l ed u ca tio n is re v e a lin g . In

1925 R alph Sm ith of the U n iv e rs ity of P it ts b u rg h p u b lish ed an a r t ic le in

T he Q u a r te r ly Jo u rn a l of S peech u n d er the t i t l e , "T he T each ing of P u b lic

28Speaking in L aw S choo ls, " S m ith ’s a r t ic le c o n c e rn e d a q u e s tio n n a ire

h e h ad s e n t to 142 law sch o o ls in the U nited S ta te s - - " a b i t m o re th an a

h a lf" re p ly in g . He d is c o v e re d th a t a " l i t t le m o re than a d ozen" o ffe red

c o u r s e s in th e i r c u r r ic u lu m s " th a t m ig h t be te c h n ic a lly and a c c u ra te ly

know n a s P u b lic Speaking, He a ls o .d is c o v e re d th a t g e n e ra lly th e se

^ ^ F ra n k lin H, K now er (c o m p ,) , T ab le of C on ten ts o f T he Q u a r ­te r ly J o u rn a l of Speech 1915-1956, Speech M onographs 1934-1956, and T he Speech T e a c h e r , 1952-1956 w ith a R ev ised Index C om piled T hrough 1956 (Speech A sso c ia tio n of A m e r ic a , 1957),

27 F ra n k lin H, K now er (co m p .) , "G rad u a te The se s A n Index of G rad u a te W ork in Speech , " Speech M onographs (1935-1963),

^^R alp h S m ith , "T he T each ing of P u b lic Speaking in L aw S choo ls, " T he Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of S peech , XL (F e b ru a ry , 1925), pp. 54-57 ,

^ % i d , , p , 54,

19

c o u rs e s w e re e le c tiv e and did not s a tis fy any of the r e q u ire m e n ts fo r the

law d e g re e . " T h e re a r e a t le a s t five in s t i tu t io n s ," the au th o r n o te s ,

" . , , in w hich the w o rk in P u b lic Speaking is p r e s c r ib e d and m ade a

re q u is ite p a r t of the law c u r r ic u lu m and a like n u m b er in w hich c r e d i t i s

g iven to w a rd the d e g re e , " The re m a in d e r of the a r t ic le b r ie f ly d is ­

c u s s e s the n a tu re of th e se co u r s e s - - s ta tin g th a t they e m p h a s iz e o u tlin ing ,

im p ro m p tu sp eak in g , psychology of p e rsu a s io n w ith r e g a rd to the ju ry ,

question ing a s in ex am in a tio n and c r o s s ex am in atio n of w itn e s s e s . They

use s ta n d a rd te x ts in pub lic speaking supp lem en ted by bo o k s of a p u re ly

le g a l n a tu re and a r e g e n e ra lly tau g h t by the sam e p e r s o n who te a c h e s

pub lic speak ing in the l ib e ra l a r t s co lleg e . The a r t ic le g ives b r ie f

a tten tio n to m o o t c o u r t p ro g ra m s in law sch o o ls , and c lo s e s w ith a s ta te ­

m en t by th en S e c re ta ry of S ta te C h a r le s H ughes in d ica tin g th a t w hile he

b e lie v e s th a t pub lic speak ing i s im p o rta n t to the la w y e r , th e re i s no

tim e in the law c u rr ic u lu m fo r i t . T he au th o r c lo se s w ith the s ta te m e n t

th a t th e re i s no q u es tio n of the value of teach ing pub lic speak in g , b u t i t

31should be p ro v id e d b e fo re g rad u a tio n f ro m co lleg e .

D uring the n ex t th ir ty y e a r s the fie ld of speech a s a n acad em ic

d isc ip lin e m ad e im p re s s iv e g row th . The am ount of sc h o la r ly r e s e a r c h

p ro d u ced w ith in the fie ld in c re a s e d , sp ec ia l a tten tio n w as given to w hat

w as c a lle d b u s in e s s and p ro fe s s io n a l speak ing , and the n u m b er of c la s s e s

3 0 ib id ., p . 55. 3 1 ib id ., p . 57.

20

o ffe re d in speech g rew in n u m b er and g e o g rap h ica l d is tr ib u tio n . By 1955,

12,071 g rad u a te d e g re e s h ad b een aw ard ed by d e p a r tm e n ts of sp eech .

D uring the th ir ty y e a r s follow ing R alph S m ith 's a r t ic le , th e re w as no

p u b lish ed ev id en ce of in te r e s t on the p a r t of the speech fie ld in the c o m ­

m u n ica tio n p ro b le m s of le g a l education .

In 1954, H. P h ilip C o nstans and D a lla s C. D ickey p u b lish ed an

a r t ic le e n title d "T he C o n tem p o ra ry R h e to ric of the L aw . H e re the

a u th o rs s e t fo rth the v a r io u s s itu a tio n s in w hich la w y e rs engage in

speaking: s e le c tio n of the ju ry , ex am in a tio n of w itn e s s e s , c r o s s - e x a m ­

in a tio n of w itn e s s e s , o b jec tio n s to te s tim o n y and a rg u m e n t on o b je c tio n s ,

the opening a d d re s s to judge o r ju ry , and the c lo sin g a rg u m e n t o r

sum m ation . T hey a lso add the s itu a tio n s of a rg u in g fo r a new t r i a l and

the a rg u m en t of an ap p ea l. A fte r a d isc u ss io n of each of th e se

s itu a tio n s , the a u th o rs p o in t out the need fo r la w y e rs to have tra in in g in

th e se v a r io u s ty p es of speaking and note the inadequacy of te x ts w hich

su it the need s of le g a l speak ing . They note th a t the f ie ld of sp eech h a s a

re sp o n s ib ili ty to f i l l th e se need s an d su g g est s tro n g ly th a t i t i s no t m ee tin g

it .

^ ^ F ra n k lin H . K now er, "G rad u a te T h e s e s ," op. c i t . , (June, 1955),p . 111.

P h il ip C onstans and D a lla s C. D ickey , "T he C o n tem p o ra ry R h e to ric of the L a w ," The S ou thern Speech J o u rn a l, XIX, No. 4 (May, 1954), pp . 277-282 .

^^Ibid., p. 277.

21

In 1955 , A lan K ent S h e a re r , a can d id a te fo r the M. A, d eg ree in

p u b lic a d d re s s a t the U n iv e rs ity of K an sa s , d e v ise d a c o u rse in le g a l

advocacy fo r p r e - le g a l s tu d e n ts , S h e a re r , who h ad had speech

e x p e rie n c e w hile an u n d e rg ra d u a te , a tten d ed law schoo l and re c e iv e d a

law d e g re e . W hile th e re , he a p p a re n tly p e rc e iv e d a n eed fo r such a

c o u rse and d ec id ed to develop i t a s a g rad u a te s tu d en t in sp eech . The

c o u rse w as p re p a re d f ro m w ritin g s by a u th o rs in bo th the speech and

le g a l f ie ld s and w as d es ig n e d a s an e x p e r im e n t w hich w ould m e a s u re

w h e th e r o r n o t s tu d en ts a tten d in g the c o u rse show ed s ig n if ic a n t im p ro v e ­

m en t in th e ir a b ility in le g a l advo cacy . U n fo rtu n a te ly , only two s tu d en ts

co m p le ted the c o u rse , and th is l im its the value of the s tu d y 's co n c lu s io n s .

A lso in 1955 , D onald E . W illiam s w ro te an a r t ic le on group

d isc u s s io n and a rg u m en ta tio n in le g a l ed u ca tio n . W illiam s no ted th a t

law , being co n ce rn ed w ith the su p e rv is io n of the r ig h ts and p r iv ile g e s of

m an and so c ie ty , d e s e rv e s th a t education b e s t d e s ig n e d to a s s u re i ts

e ffic ien cy . He a lso no ted th a t th e r e w as w id e sp re a d c o n tro v e rs y a s to

w hat m ade a good ed u ca tio n , in d ica tin g a n u m b er of a r t ic le s f ro m leg a l

jo u rn a ls w hich w ill be d is c u s s e d la te r in th is s tu d y . W illiam s o b se rv e d

th a t " sp ee ch and law have a lw ay s b een c o n s id e re d c lo se ly a llie d

^^A lan K ent S h e a re r , "A C o u rse in L e g a l A dvocacy fo r P r e - L e g a l S tuden ts (unpublished M a s te r 's th e s is . U n iv e rs ity of K a n sa s , 1955).

^^D onald E . W illiam s, "G roup D isc u ss io n and A rg u m en ta tio n in L e g a l E d u c a tio n , " The Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of S peech , X LI, No. 4 (D ecem b er, 1955).

22

d isc ip lin e s . " T u rn in g to an c ien t t im e s , W illiam s s a y s , " the c la s s ic a l

r h e to r s , ho ld ing th a t rh e to r ic w as an a r t w hich could e ffe c tiv e ly en e rg ize

37t ru th , d is c u s s e d ex ten s iv e ly i t s ap p lic a tio n to fo re n s ic speak ing . " He

fu r th e r a s s e r t s th a t " fro m an tiqu ity to the p r e s e n t day , the a s so c ia tio n

b e tw een th e se two s tu d ie s h a s b een p e rp e tu a te d . "

W illiam s a s s e r t s th a t th e re a r e two fo rm s of w hich a r e "uniquely

im p o rta n t" to th e p re - la w s tu d en t’s t ra in in g . T h ese a r e d isc u s s io n and

a rg u m e n ta tio n . In o rd e r to d isc o v e r the p r e s e n t (1955) th ink ing in law

sch o o ls and c o lle g e s re g a rd in g the v a lu e of d isc u s s io n and a rg u m en ta tio n

to the p r e - la w and law stu d en t, W illiam s sen t out a q u e s tio n n a ire to 39

law sch o o ls an d 157 u n d e rg rad u a te c o lleg e s o ffe rin g p r e - la w tra in in g ;

he re c e iv e d r e p l ie s f ro m 37 law sch o o ls and 141 c o lle g e s . T he re s u l ts

show ed th a t n in e ty -f iv e p e r cen t of the p e rs o n s rep ly in g fo r th e law

schoo ls "b e lie v e th a t tra in in g in g roup d isc u s s io n w ould be h e lp fu l to the

la w y e r , b u t none of th e se sch o o ls o f fe rs o r p la n s to o ffe r sy s te m a tic

study in i t . " H alf of th ese re sp o n d e n ts b e liev ed th a t th e c u r r ic u lu m w as

too crow ded to p e r m it an ad d itio n a l c o u rse of th is ty p e , and fo r ty p e r

cen t f e l t th a t t ra in in g in d isc u ss io n w as a lre a d y p ro v id e d in such c o u rse s

a s t r i a l ta c t ic e and le g a l n eg o tia tio n s and in the a c t iv it ie s of le g a l a id

c l in ic s . W illiam s co n c lu d es , h o w ev e r, th a t " th is k ind of tra in in g is

no t p r im a r i ly co n ce rn e d w ith p r in c ip le s and m ethods of g roup d iscu ss io n

b u t w ith le g a l p ro c e d u re s and p r a c t ic e s . "^9

3’ Ibid., pp. 397-398. 3Sibid., p. 399 39ibid.

23

W illiam s a lso d isc o v e re d th a t six ty p e r c en t of the u n d e rg ra d u a te

c o lleg e s o ffe red c o u rse s in d isc u ss io n , and th a t the schoo ls w hich did

no t in d ic a te d the re a so n w as th a t d isc u ss io n w as u til iz e d in ex is tin g

c o u r s e s . No schoo l re q u ire d i t s - p r e - la w s tu d en ts to take a c o u rse of

th is n a tu re and only four p e r cen t b e liev e " th a t such tra in in g w ould be

unhelpfu l to th e se s tu d en ts . " "T he ou tstand ing r e a s o n given fo r not

re q u ir in g p re - la w studen ts to study group d is c u s s io n ," th is q u es tio n n a ire

re v e a le d , " is th a t th e re h a s b een no g e n e ra l dem and fro m the law schoo ls

th a t s tu d en ts tak e th is tra in in g w hile u n d e rg ra d u a te s .

W ith r e g a rd to a rg u m en ta tio n , W illiam s found th a t none of the

law sch o o ls o ffe red study in b a s ic th e o re tic a l p r in c ip le s and a l l of the

p a r tic ip a tin g d ean s and law p r o fe s s o r s ex cep t one " th in k such tra in in g

would be h e lp fu l. " A gain , the crow ded c u rr ic u lu m w as given by o v er

s ix ty p e r cen t a s the re a s o n fo r not o ffe rin g the c o u r s e , and fo r ty - fo u r

p e r c en t in d ica ted th a t they fe l t such tra in in g b e lo n g ed in p r e - la w study.

F u r th e r , e ig h ty -o n e p e r cen t of the law sch o o ls in th is su rv ey o ffe r m oot

c o u r t a c t iv it ie s w hich p ro v id e s tu d en ts w ith tra in in g in advocacy , bu t

only th ir ty p e r cen t of the sch o o ls re q u ire s tu d en ts to p a r t ic ip a te . A lso ,

the e m p h a s is in th ese a c tiv it ie s is on le g a l p ro c e d u re s , no t on the u n d e r ­

ly ing p r in c ip le s of advocacy .

4°Ibid.

24

Of the c o lleg e s sam p led , e ig h ty -se v e n p e r cen t o ffe r a rg u m e n ta ­

tio n c o u r s e s b u t only th re e p e r cen t r e q u ire d the c o u rse of p r e - la w

s tu d e n ts . The la c k of th e re q u ire m e n t w as the sam e a s b e fo re - -n o

dem and f ro m the law sch o o ls . S ev en ty -e ig h t p e r cen t of th e se sch o o ls

o ffe re d e x t r a c u r r ic u la r debate and none r e q u ire d i t of p re - la w s tu d e n ts .

In the conclud ing p o r tio n of h is p a p e r , W illiam s r e i te r a te s the

a p p a re n t d isc re p a n c y b e tw een w hat is d e s ir e d by the law sch o o ls and

w hat they see k to p ro v id e th e m se lv e s o r have p ro v id e d fo r th em by the

c o lle g e s . He n o te s th a t the le g a l p ro fe s s io n i s unw illing to p r e s c r ib e

p re - la w c o u r s e s and the co lleg es w ill not r e q u ire th em u n til the law

sch o o ls do p r e s c r ib e , W illia m s ' c o n c lu s io n -- th e te a c h e r s of sp eech

should co m m u n ica te to the law schoo ls co n cern in g w hat they h ave to

42o ffe r .

The f in a l a r t ic le d isc o v e re d th rough th is s e a rc h of the f ie ld of

43sp eech w as w r itte n by D avid B , S tro th e r . S tro th e r , in d isc u s s in g

p e rsu a s io n in A m e ric a n le g a l p ro c e d u re , s t r e s s e s ag ain the fa c t th a t

law is co n c e rn ed w ith so c ia l co n tro l and the v a lu e of a c o u r t 's d e c is io n

is p ro p o rtio n a te to the " c la r i ty by which bo th co n s tru c tiv e and re fu ta tiv e

lin e s of a rg u m e n t a r e p re s e n te d by opposing co u n se l. . . . T h is

'^^Ibid. ^ ^ Ib id ., p . 402.

'^^David B . S tro th e r , " P e rs u a s io n in A m e ric a n L eg a l P ro c e d u re , "W este rn Speech (F a ll, 1961), pp. 231-236.

44I b id . , pp . 231-232.

25

a u th o r re v ie w s fro m a r h e to r ic a l p o in t of v iew the s ig n if ic a n t a ttitu d e s

to w ard p e rs u a s io n in A m e r ic a n a p p e lla te c o u r ts , and c a lls a tte n tio n to

bo th the b r ie f and the o r a l a rg u m e n t. In th is d isc u s s io n , he n o te s th a t

" , . , te n p e r cen t of a p p ro x im a te ly th i r ty th o u san d c a s e s h e a rd each

y e a r in s ta te and f e d e ra l a p p e lla te c o u r ts w here o ra l a rg u m e n t is u sed ,

am o u n ts to a nu m b er s iz e a b le enough to have a s ig n if ic a n t in fluence on

so c ia l re g u la tio n , and to w a r ra n t s e r io u s c o n s id e ra tio n , "^5

A fte r rev iew ing som e of the te s tim o n y fro m ju d g es and o th e r p e r ­

sons a s s o c ia te d w ith the law e m p h as iz in g the im p o rta n c e of o ra l a rg u m e n t,

S tro th e r ex am in es p o s s ib le c a u s e s of th e la c k of in te r e s t in i t . Among

o th e r s , he c i te s the f re q u e n tly m en tio n ed su rv ey am ong g ra d u a te s of the

H a rv a rd U n iv e rs ity L aw School w hich gave sk ill in advo cacy sig n ifican tly

the lo w e s t ra tin g am ong th o se s k il ls m o s t im p o rta n t in th e ir le g a l p r a c ­

tic e , T he au th o r a lso lo o k s f a r th e r b a c k in h is to ry to find the cau se of

the d iff icu lty . He sa y s .

The ex is tin g a ttitu d e to w ard advocacy r e f le c ts a b r e a k w hich e x is ts b e tw een law and o th e r a llie d le a rn e d a r e a s . It m ay have h ad i t s fo rm a l beg inn ing in 460 A . D , w hen E m p e ro r L eo w as the f i r s t to r e q u ire th a t a s p ir in g la w y e rs should take ex am in a tio n s b e fo re b e in g c e r t i f ie d to p r a c t ic e . A s the study an d p ra c t ic e of law b e c a m e in c re a s in g ly sp e c ia liz e d , o th e r a r e a s w hich had co n tr ib u te d m u ch to the la w y e r’s b ack g ro u n d an d developm en t w e re n e c e s s a r i ly d e -e m p h a s iz e d . The fo rm a l s tudy of rh e to r ic w as am ong th em ,

4 5 ib id ,, p . 232, '^^ Ib id ,, p . 235,

26

In the con clu sio n of h is a r t i c le , S tro th e r s ta te s w hat he fe e ls i s the p r o ­

b le m w ith r e g a rd to sp eech and the p r a c t ic e of law in ap p e lla te c o u r ts :

The p la c e of o r a l a rg u m e n t in A m e r ic a n le g a l p ro c e d u re i s p a ra d o x ic a l. Ju d g e s and law y e rs a g re e th a t i t is a p a r t of le g a l p ro c e d u re , b u t f ro m th is ju n c tu re on opinions d iffe r .Ju d g es p r e s e n t s tro n g c la im s fo r i t s e ffec tiv e u se b e ca u se i t a s s i s t s th em in d e te rm in in g so c ia l re g u la tio n . They p o in t out, fu r th e r , th a t the la w y e r can do m u ch w ith o r a l a rg u m en t to im p ro v e h is e f fe c tiv e n e s s . On the o th e r h an d , le g a l s c h o la rs and la w y e rs s e e m to su b o rd in a te the study of o ra l a rg u m e n t to such a d e g re e th a t m o s t la w y e rs , a t b e s t , have re c e iv e d l i t t le of such tra in in g a c a d e m ic a lly .

While a la w y e r m a y be tra in e d to p r e p a re a s e r ie s of v a lid a rg u m en ts in su p p o rt of a p o s itio n , h e i s s e r io u s ly h a m p e re d in the p re s e n ta t io n of h is ca se if he can n o t adap t sk illfu lly to the g iv e -a n d -ta k e of o r a l a rg u m e n t. If aU law y e rs w ere b e t te r equipped w ith know ledge of the u se of bo th the p r in c ip le s of rh e to r ic and law , th e c o u r ts w ould b e b e t te r p re p a re d to d i s ­p en se ju s t ic e in the n a tio n 's s e rv ic e ,

The p r e c e d in g / re v ie w of the c o n te m p o ra ry l i te r a tu r e of le g a l

r h e to r ic g e n e ra te s a n i n t e r e s t in fu r th e r study of the a r e a . W hile th e re

a p p e a rs a s tro n g in te r e s t in ob tain ing g r e a te r u n d erstan d in g of the r h e ­

to r ic a l functions and th e o r ie s in law on th e p a r t of the le a d e r s of the

le g a l p ro fe s s io n , the s c h o la rs of rh e to r ic h av e ev idenced only a p a s s in g

in c lin a tio n to p e r fo rm the n e c e s s a ry in v e s tig a tio n . The q u es tio n s s u r ­

rounding the e x is te n c e , c h a r a c te r , and v a lid ity of an u n d erly in g rh e to r ic a l

th e o ry in A m e ric a n le g a l p ra c t ic e r e m a in , fo r the m o st p a r t , u n an sw ered .

f ’ Ibid,, p, 236,

Ce

27

Concepts R e lev a n t to the Study

R h e to r ic a l th eo ry

W hile the te rm " rh e to r ic " i s an a n c ien t and v e n e ra te d w o rd , i t

i s a lso a m uch u sed w ord by sc h o la r and lay m an a lik e . F o r m any y e a r s ,

th e re h a s e x is te d quite a d iv e rg en ce of m ean in g s fo r the te rm , no t only

b e tw een sc h o la rs and la y m en , b u t am ong ind iv idual lay m en a s w ell. In

the opin ion of the au th o r , the te r m " rh e to r ic a l th e o ry " is m o re su itab le

to th is study than would be any of the o th e r te r m s u se d in s im ila r c o n ­

te x ts . B u t b ecau se of the am biguous c h a ra c te r of the w ord , i t is

n e c e s s a ry to d isc u s s i t s m ean ing a s u sed in th is study.

W ith re g a rd to the m u ltifa r io u s m ean in g s of " r h e to r ic ," D onald

C. B ry a n t sa id in 1953, "R h e to ric . . . en joys s e v e ra l o th e r m ean in g s

w hich . . . s e rv e to m ake a n a ly s is of i t d iff icu lt. In g e n e ra l th e se a re

the sam e m ean in g s w hich [JioytJ H udson rev iew ed th ir ty y e a r s ag o .

. . . B ry a n t p ro c e e d s to l i s t som e of the o th e r known m ean in g s

g iven to the te rm " rh e to r ic " : b o m b ast; h ig h -so u n d in g w ords w ithout

co n ten t, o r a to r ic a l fa ls if ic a tio n to h ide m eaning ; so p h is try ; o rn a m e n ta ­

tio n and the study of f ig u re s of speech ; m o s t com m only am ong aca d e m ic

fo lk ; F re s h m a n E ng lish ; and f in a lly , le a s t com m only of a ll , the w hole

a r t of spoken d isc o u rs e , e sp e c ia lly p e rsu a s iv e d i s c o u r s e . A s the

"^®Donald C, B ry a n t, "R h e to ric : I ts F u n c tio n s and i ts Scope, "The Q u a r te r ly Jo u rn a l of Speech , XXXIX, No. 4 (D ecem b er, 1953), 402.

"^ Ibid.

28

p r e s e n t study h a s b ro u g h t an ex ten s iv e ex am in a tio n of the w ritin g of le g a l

s c h o la rs and p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s , i t can be sa id w ith a s s u ra n c e th a t

w hen th ey u se the te r m " rh e to r ic " they m o s t com m only m ean som eth ing

in the ra n g e of the f i r s t few B ry a n t d e f in itio n s --b o m b a s t, h igh sounding

w o rd s , e tc .

T h u s , the o b jec tiv e of th is sec tio n is to r e je c t m o s t of the p o p u la r

co n cep ts of " rh e to r ic ;" and re p la c e them w ith a m o re su itab le one fo r

the p u rp o se s of th is study.

M o st im p o rta n t in u n d e rs tan d in g the v a r io u s m ean in g s ap p lied to

rh e to r ic is the d iffe ren ce of p o s itio n tak en by P la to and A r is to t le , F o r ,

a s la te r in v e s tig a tio n in to le g a l education w ill r e v e a l , i t is th is v e ry

d iffe ren ce w hich h a s been so im p o rta n t in d e te rm in in g the ro le of c o m ­

m u n ica tio n tra in in g in le g a l edu ca tio n , P la to m ade h is p o s itio n c le a r in

th e G o rg ia s :

S o c ra te s , T hen do you th in k th a t to have le a rn e d is the sam e a s to b e lie v e ? T h a t i s , is know ledge the sam e a s b e lie f o r a r e th ey d iffe re n t?

G o rg ia s , To m y m in d , S o c ra te s , they s e e m d iffe ren t,S o c ra te s , You a r e qu ite r ig h t and you m ay co n firm y o u r

opin ion f ro m th is fac t: If anyone should a sk you, 'G o rg ia s , is th e re such a th ing a s a fa ls e b e lie f and a t ru e b e lie f? * I im ag in e th a t you w ould say th a t th e re i s ,

G o rg ia s , Y es,S o c ra te s , W ell th en , i s th e re both a fa lse and a tru e

know ledge?G o rg ia s , C e rta in ly n o t,S o c ra te s , T hen i t i s p e r fe c tly c le a r th a t know ledge and

b e lie f a r e no t the sa m e ,G o rg ia s , T ru e ,

29

S o c ra te s , S til l , th o se who have le a rn e d have b een p e r ­suaded ju s t a s m uch a s th o se who b e lie v e ,

G o rg ia s , T h a t is so,S o c ra te s , S hall w e, th en , a s su m e two k inds of p e rs u a s io n ,

the one p ro d u c in g b e lie f w ithout c e r ta in ty , the o th e r know ledge?G o rg ia s , Y e s , of c o u rse ,S o c ra te s , T hen w hich k ind of p e rs u a s io n co n cern in g ju s t ic e

and in ju s tic e d o es rh e to r ic e ffec t in law c o u r ts and o th e r public g a th e r in g s , the kind w hich p ro d u c e s b e lie f w ithout know ­led g e , o r th e k ind w hich y ie ld s know ledge?

G o rg ia s , I t w ould seem quite obv io u s, S o c ra te s , th a t i t is the k ind w h ich p ro d u c e s m e re b e lie f ,

S o c ra te s , So r h e to r ic , i t s e e m s , e ffe c ts a p e rsu a s io n w hich can p ro d u c e b e lie f about ju s t ic e and in ju s tic e , b u t canno t give in s tru c t io n about them ,

G o rg ia s , Y es ,S o c ra te s , The rh e to r ic ia n , th en , i s no t a te a c h e r of law

c o u rts and o th e r pu b lic g a th e rin g s a s to w hat is r ig h t o r w rong , b u t m e re ly a c r e a to r of b e lie fs ; fo r ev id en tly he could n e v e r in s tru c t so la rg e a g a th e rin g on such w eighty m a tte r s in a sh o rt tim e ,

G o rg ia s , H e c e r ta in ly co u ld n 't,

T hus, P la to v iew ed rh e to r ic a s a p ro c e s s w hich could p ro d u ce b e lie fs

w ithout a n e c e s s a r y c o r re la tio n w ith r e a l i ty . He co m p ared i t to p ro d u c ­

ing the a p p e a ra n c e of b eau ty th ro u g h c o s m e tic s r a th e r than t ru e b eau ty

p ro d u ced by b u ild in g up the body in g y m n a s tic s . T hus, P la to co m es to

be a s so c ia te d w ith the school of thought th a t s e e s rh e to r ic a s the p o te n tia l

enem y of in q u iry , know ledge, o r t ru th and ju s tic e depending upon the

p a r t ic u la r f ra m e of re fe re n c e of the in d iv id u a l. T h u s, in le g a l edu ca tio n ,

rh e to r ic could v e ry w ell be c o n s id e re d the a n ti th e s is of the o b jec t of le g a l

education , w hich i s in q u iry into the su b stan ce and sc ien ce of law and the

avoidance of the sh a llo w o r sham .

C, H elm bo ld ( tra n s , ) P la to 's G o rg ias (New Y ork: TheL ib e ra l A r ts P r e s s , 1952), pp , 13-14,

30

A r is to t le i s id e n tifie d w ith the o th e r school of thought concern ing

r h e to r ic , fo r h e b eg in s h is d is c u s s io n of the su b jec t by noting th a t

"R h e to r ic i s th e c o u n te rp a r t of D ia le c tic . . . , In d ica tin g th a t the

en thym em e is th e v eh ic le of r h e to r ic a l p ro o f, A r is to t le say s.

I t i s c le a r , th en , th a t th e a r t i s t i c m ethod h a s to do w ith p ro o fs in th e s t r i c t e r s e n se . Now p ro o f is a k ind of d em o n ­s tra t io n ; f o r we e n te r ta in the s tro n g e s t conv ic tion of a th ing if we b e lie v e th a t i t h a s b een 'd e m o n s tra te d . • R h e to r ic a l p ro o f, h o w ev er, C is no t sc ie n tif ic d e m o n s tra tio n ] ; i t ta k e s the fo rm of an en th y m em e , th is b e in g , in g e n e ra l , the m o s t e ffec tiv e am ong the v a r io u s fo rm s of p e rsu a s io n . The en th y m em e, a g a in , i s a k in d of sy llo g ism ; now e v e ry kind of sy llo g ism fa lls w ith in the p ro v in c e of D ia le c tic , and m u s t be ex am in ed u n d er D ia le c tic a s a w hole, o r u n d e r som e b ran ch of i t . . . . T ru th and l ik e n e s s to txuth a r e d is c e rn e d by one and the sam e facu lty ; w hile h u m a n n a tu re , le t u s add , h a s ap titude enough fo r d is c e rn in g w hat is t ru e , and m e n in m o s t c a s e s do a r r iv e a t the t ru th . C onsequen tly one who is sk illed in d isc e rn in g the t ru th can do w e ll in w eighing p ro b a b ili t ie s . . . .

B u t th e a r t of R h e to ric h a s i t s va lu e . I t i s v a lu a b le , f i r s t , b e c a u se t ru th and ju s tic e a r e by n a tu re m o re p o w erfu l than th e ir o p p o s ite s ; so th a t, w hen d e c is io n s a r e n o t m ad e a s they should b e , the s p e a k e rs w ith the r ig h t on th e ir s ide have only th e m se lv e s to thank fo r the o u tco m e. T h e ir n e g le c t of the a r t n e ed s c o r re c t io n .

P ro c e e d in g to a d e fin itio n , A r is to t le say s , "So le t R h e to ric be defined a s

the facu lty . . . of d isco v e rin g in the p a r t ic u la r c a se w hat a r e the a v a i l­

ab le m e a n s of p e rs u a s io n . " T h is i s , " he sa y s , " the function of no

o th e r a r t . . . . "

^^L ane C o o p er, The R h e to r ic of A r is to tle (New Y ork: Apple to n - C e n tu ry -C ro f ts , I n c . , 1932), p . 1.

^^Ibid., p. 5. 53ibid., p. 7.

31

The o th e rs a r e each in s tru c tiv e o r p e rs u a s iv e w ith r e g a rd to som e sp e c ia l s u b je c t-m a tte r . T hus m ed ic in e in fo rm s u s abou t the co n d itio n s of h e a lth and d ise a se ; g eo m etry about the p ro p e r t ie s of m a g n itu d es; a r i th m e tic abou t n u m b e rs ; and so w ith the r e s t of the a r t s and s c ie n c e s . B u t R h e to r ic , i t would see m , h a s the fu n ctio n of d isc o v e rin g the m e a n s of p e rsu a s io n fo r e v e ry c a s e , so to sp eak , th a t is o ffered ; and hence we say th a t the a r t a s such h a s no sp e c ia l a p p lic a tio n to any d is tin c t c la s s of su b je c ts .

A r is to tle d iv id es the p ro o fs o r p e rs u a s io n s of rh e to r ic into two c a te g o r ie s :

n o n - a r t i s t i c - - " a l l such a s a r e no t su p p lied by o u r own e f fo r ts , bu t

e x is te d b e fo reh an d , such a s w itn e s s e s , a d m iss io n s u n d er to r tu r e ,

w r itte n c o n tra c ts and the lik e ;" and a r t i s t i c - - " th o s e th a t m ay be f u r ­

n ish e d by the m eth o d of R h e to ric th ro u g h o u r own e f fo r ts . T h e re fo re ,

A r is to tle p e rc e iv e s rh e to r ic and d ia le c tic a s co n s tan tly in te ra c tin g

p r o c e s s e s , n e ith e r co m p le te w ithout the o th e r .

R ic h a rd M . W eav er, in h is m o d e rn d isc u s s io n of the su b je c t,

f in d s th a t A r is to tle and P la to w ere n o t a s s e p a ra te d w ith r e g a rd to the

re la t io n of r h e to r ic an d d ia le c tic a s m any suppose . Studying the p o s itio n

of P la to a s e x p re s s e d in the P h a e d ru s , W eaver say s th is:

Now rh e to r ic a s we have d is c u s s e d i t in re la tio n to the lo v e rs c o n s is ts of t ru th p lu s i t s a r tfu l p re se n ta tio n , and fo r th is re a so n i t b e c o m e s n e c e s s a ry to say som eth ing m o re about the n a tu ra l o rd e r of d ia le c tic and rh e to r ic . In any g e n e ra l c h a ra c te r iz a tio n rh e to r ic w ill inc lude d ia le c tic , b u t fo r the study of m e th o d i t i s n e c e s s a ry to s e p a ra te the tw o.D ia le c tic i s a m e th o d of in v es tig a tio n w hose o b jec t i s the e s ta b lish m e n t of t ru th about doubtful p ro p o s itio n s .

^^Ibid. , pp. 7 -8 . ^^Ib id ., p . 8.

32

T h e re i s , th en , no tru e rh e to r ic w ithou t d ia le c t ic , fo r the d ia le c tic p ro v id e s th a t b a s is of ’h igh sp e cu la tio n abou t n a tu re ’ w ithout w hich rh e to r ic in the n a r ro w e r se n se h a s nothing to w ork upon. Y et, w hen the d isp u ted te r m s h ave b een e s ta b lish e d , we a r e a t the l im it of d ia le c tic . How does the noble rh e to r ic ia n p ro c e e d fro m th is p o in t on? T h a t the c le a r e s t d e m o n s tra tio n in te r m s of lo g ica l in c lu s io n and ex c lu s io n o ften f a i ls to win a s s e n t we h a rd ly need s ta te ; th e r e fo re , to w hat d oes the rh e to r ic ia n r e s o r t a t th is c r i t i c a l p a s sa g e ? It i s the s tag e a t w hich he p a s s e s fro m the lo g ic a l to the a n a lo g ica l, o r i t is w h ere f ig u ­ra tio n com es in to r h e to r ic ,

P la to say s th is in the P h a e d ru s :

S o c ra te s . W hen an o ra to r who know s no th ing abou t good o r ev il u n d e rta k e s to p e rsu a d e a c ity in the sam e s ta te of ig n o ra n c e , not by s ing ing the p r a is e s of an a s s ’s shadow m asq u e rad in g a s a h o r s e , b u t by reco m m en d in g e v il a s though i t w e re good (for he h a s stud ied the op in ions of the m ob and can p e rsu ad e i t to do e v il in p lace of good); u n d e r such c i r ­cu m stan c es w hat s o r t of a h a rv e s t do you th in k rh e to r ic would re a p f ro m the seed she h a s sown?

P h a e d ru s . N ot a v e ry accep tab le one.S o c ra te s . Can i t b e , th en , m y f r ie n d , th a t we have in su lted

the a r t of m aking sp eech es m o re f re e ly than w e should hav e? P e rh a p s she m ay re p ly , ’W hat in the w o rld i s the po in t of th is s tra n g e n o n se n se , g en tlem en ? R em em b er th a t I b r in g no com pulsion to le a r n the a r t of speech on anyone who is ig n o ra n t of the tru th ; in d eed , if m y adv ice is w o rth an y th ing , a m an should no t r e s o r t to m e u n til he h as le a rn e d the tru th . Y et th is b o a s t I can m ake: w ithout m e even the m an who tho rough ly is f a m il ia r w ith the fa c ts w ill be n o t a b i t n e a r e r to the a r t of p e rsu a s io n , ’

P h a e d ru s . And w on’t she be r ig h t to say so?S o c ra te s . I a g r e e - - i f , th a t i s , the a rg u m e n ts th a t com e

fo rw a rd to speak fo r h e r should give te s tim o n y th a t she is an a r t . Now I se e m , a s i t w e re , to h e a r som e a rg u m e n ts a d ­vancing to give th e i r év idence th a t she te l l s l i e s , th a t she is no t an a r t a t a l l , b u t an a r t le s s ro u tin e .

^^R ich ard M. W eav er, The E th ic s of R h e to ric (Chicago: H en ry R eg n e ry Com pany, 1953), pp . 15, 17-18.

^^W. C. H elm bold and W. G. R abinow itz ( tr a n s . ) , P la to ’s P h a e d ru s (New Yo rk : The L ib e ra l A r ts P r e s s , 1956), p . 47.

33

T h e re fo re , th e c la s s ic a l w r i te r s on the su b jec t say th a t rh e to r ic i s co n ­

c e rn e d w ith th e p r o c e s s of p e r s u a s io n and the m e a n s to p e rs u a s io n (no

d is tin c tio n b e in g m ade b e tw een w r i t te n and spoken p e r s u a s io n , a lthough

the e a r ly G re e k s w ere obv iously m o re co n ce rn ed w ith spoken p e r s u a s io n ) .

In sp ite of the a lle g e d s e p a ra tio n of p h ilo so p h ie s , b o th P la to and A r is to t le

fe l t th a t r h e to r ic n e c e s s a r i ly m u s t involve d ia le c tic o r the p ro c e s s of

lo g ic a l in q u iry and d is c o u rs e , a lthough P la to d isa p p ro v e d of the co n cep t

of p ro b a b ility upon w hich A r is to t le r e s te d h is s y s te m .

M oving to m o re r e c e n t in te rp re ta t io n s of r h e to r ic , D onald C.

B ry a n t i s an a r t ic u la te sp o k esm an of the m o d ern v iew of rh e to r ic by

th o se in the f ie ld of sp eech . In an a r t ic le on the fu n c tio n s and scope of

r h e to r ic , B ry a n t u s e s th is fo r a w ork ing defin itio n : " . . . I tak e rh e to r ic

58to be the ra tio n a le of in fo rm a tiv e and su a so ry d is c o u r s e . " L a te r

expanding on th a t d e fin itio n , B ry a n t no tes,

. . . I t U rh e to ric ] o p e ra te s ch iefly in the a r e a s of the co n tin g en t, i t s a im i s the a tta in m e n t of m ax im u m p ro b a b ility a s a b a s is fo r public d e c is io n , i t i s the o rg a n iz in g and a n i­m a tin g p r in c ip le of a l l s u b je c t-m a tte r s w hich have a re le v a n t b e a r in g on th is d e c is io n . '

F in a lly , r e s ta t in g h is m a in id e a in a way to d raw to g e th e r h is id e a s on

the m ean in g of rh e to r ic , the a u th o r say s th is

C O

D onald C, B ry a n t, "R h e to r ic : I ts F u n c tio n s and I ts S cope, "op. c i t . , p . 404.

^ ^ ib id ., p . 408.

34

. . . R h e to r ic , o r the rh e to r ic a l , is the function in h u m an a f fa i r s w hich g o v e rn s and g iv es d ire c tio n to th a t c re a tiv e a c tiv ity , th a t p r o c e s s of c r i t ic a l a n a ly s is , th a t b ra n c h of le a rn in g , w hich a d d re s s th e m se lv e s to the whole phenom enon of the d e s ig n e d u se of language fo r th e p ro m u lg a tio n of in fo rm a tio n , id e a s , and a tti tu d e s . Though i t is in s tru m e n ta l in the d is c o v e ry of id e a s and in fo rm a tio n , i t s c h a r a c te r is t ic fu n c tio n i s the p u b lic a tio n , the p u b lic iz in g , the h u m an iz in g , the an im a tin g of th em fo r a re a l iz e d and u su a lly sp ec ific au d ie n c e . A t i t s b e s t i t se e k s the ’e n e rg iz in g of t ru th , ’ in o rd e r to m ak e ’re a s o n and the w ill of God p re v a il . * B ut ex cep t in sc ie n c e , and no doubt theo logy , the p ro m u lg a tio n of t ru th , s u re o r d e m o n s tra b le , is out of the q u es tio n . N o rm a lly the r h e to r ic a l fu n ctio n s e rv e s a s h igh a d e g re e of p ro b a b ility a s the co m b in a tio n of su b je c t, au d ien ce , sp e a k e r , and o c c a s io n a d m its . R h e to r ic m ay o r m ay n o t b e invo lved (though the s p e a k e r - w r i te r m u s t be) in the d e te rm in a tio n of the v a lid ity of the id e a s b e in g p ro m u lg a te d . Such d e te rm in a tio n w ill b e the p ro v in c e in any g iven s itu a tio n of ph ilo so p h y , e th ic s , p h y s ic s , e c o n o m ic s , p o l i t ic s , e u g e n ic s , m e d ic in e , h y d ra u lic s , o r b u c o lic s . To r h e to r ic , h o w ev er, and to no o th e r •••ationale, b e lo n g s the e ffic ien cy - - th e v a lid ity if you w il l- -o f the r e la t io n in the id e a -a u d ie n c e -s p e a k e r s itu a tio n .

B ry a n t a d d r e s s e s h im se lf to the q u es tio n of the good an d b ad ends

of rh e to r ic ; h e say s i t d o es n o t m a t te r w h e th e r the in d iv id u a l i s a p re a c h e r

o r an a g i ta to r , a m e s s ia h o r a m oun tebank , advocate o r a d v e r t i s e r ,

th ey a r e a l l u s e r s of rh e to r ic and m u s t be s tu d ied . "T he f a c t i s , " B ry a n t

s a y s , " th a t in th e ir c h a r a c te r is t ic p reo c cu p a tio n w ith m an ip u la tin g the

p u b lic m in d , th ey a r e one. " He m ig h t have added the p r iv a te m in d a lso .

"T h ey m u s t n o t a l l be ap p ro v ed o r em u la ted , " he goes on to say , "but

^ ° Ib id . , pp . 412-413 .

35

they m u s t a l l be s tu d ied a s h ighly s ig n if ic an t so c ia l p h en o m en a , l e s t we

be ig n o ra n t of th em , and hence p o w e r le s s b e fo re th em , fo r good o r fo r

i l l .

R ecen tly , s c h o la rs of speech and co m m unica tion h ave tu rn e d to

p sycho logy , so c ia l p sycho logy , and o th e r so c ia l sc ie n c e s fo r m e th o d and

d a ta to advance th e i r u n d ers tan d in g of the com m unica tion p r o c e s s . T h is

h a s p ro d u ced a new v o cab u la ry and a new w ay of view ing co m m u n ica tio n

o r rh e to r ic . In R e a d e r in P u b lic O pinion and C om m unication , a n u m b er

of in d iv id u a ls w ith th is so c ia l sc ien ce o r ie n ta tio n p r e s e n t th e ir d efin itio n s

of co m m u n ica tio n . C h a r le s H. Cooley s a y s , "By com m u n ica tio n is

m e a n t the m e c h a n ism th rough w hich h um an re la tio n s e x is t and develop

a l l of the sym bo ls of the m ind , to g e th e r w ith the m ea n s of conveying

th em th rough space and p re s e rv in g th em in tim e " ; R o b e r t P a r k sa y s th a t

"co m m u n ica tio n m a in ta in s the c o n c e r t n e c e s s a ry to enab le o u r g ro u p s to

function to g e th e r" ; C a r l I . H ovland d e fin es co m m unica tion a s the " P r o ­

c e s s by w hich an in d iv id u a l (com m unica to r) t r a n s m its s tim u li to m odify

the b eh a v io r of o th e r ind iv id u als (co m m u n ica tees)" ; and R o b e r t C,

A ngell calls i t " m e re ly the p a ss in g of id e a s f ro m one m in d to a n o th e r .

The re c e iv in g m in d m ay n o t a c c ep t the id e a s , and even the o rig in a tin g

m in d m ay no t b e lie v e th em .

^ ^ Ib id ., p . 411.

^ ^ B e rn a rd B e re ls o n and M o rr is Janow itz (eds. ), R e a d e r in P u b ­lic O pinion and C om m unica tion , (G lencoe, Illin o is : F r e e P r e s s , 1953).

36

B ry a n t, the t ra d it io n a l rh e to r ic ia n , se e m s to a c c e p t th is new

o rie n ta tio n , a lthough he i s unw illing to re lin q u ish h is g e n e ra l o r ie n ta tio n .

He sa y s th a t m o s t w r i te r s of m o d e rn books on a s p e c ts of speech

. . . inc lude a s u p - to -d a te a s ta te m e n t a s p o ss ib le of the p y sc h o lo g ic a l and the ra tio n a l b a s e s of rh e to r ic . I t i s a co m m o n ­p la c e th a t of the s tu d ie s re c e n tly com e to new and p ro m is in g m a tu r i ty , p sy ch o lo g y , e sp e c ia lly so c ia l p sycho logy , and c u ltu ra l an th ro p o lo g y have m uch to te a c h m o d e rn rh e to r ic and to c o r r e c t o r r e in te r p r e t in t ra d it io n a l r h e to r ic . The sam e m ay be sa id of the v a r io u s new v e n tu re s in to the study of m ean in g , u n d er the g e n e ra l h ead of s e m a n tic s . How language m e an s is obv iously im p o rta n t to the ra tio n a le of in fo rm a tiv e and su a so ry d is c o u rs e . N e v e r th e le s s , in sp ite of I . A , R ic h a rd s ' book The P h ilo so p h y of R h e to ric , the th e o ry of m ean in g is no t the ph ilo sophy of rh e to r ic , any m o re th an i s the p sycho logy of p e rc e p tio n . R h e­to r ic i s the o rg a n iz e r of a l l such fo r the w ield ing of pub lic

• • 63opin ion .

F ro m the p re c e d in g d isc u ss io n i t is c le a r th a t th e re a r e two

m a jo r p o s itio n s f ro m w hich co m m u n ica tio n o r rh e to r ic i s today v ie w e d --

one f ro m the p e rsp e c tiv e of the h u m a n itie s and the o th e r f ro m the so c ia l

sc ie n c e p o in t of v iew . A s i s a lso c le a r , th e se p o s itio n s a r e n o t in c o m ­

p a tib le . F o th e rin g h a m , in h is fo rth -c o m in g book on the F u n c tio n s in

P e r s u a s io n p r e s e n ts a m o d e rn v iew of co m m unica tion and p e rs u a s io n

f ro m the p e rsp e c tiv e of so c ia l s c ie n c e . He in d ic a te s th a t p e rsu a s io n

(which c o n s titu te s a g r e a t m a jo r i ty of the com m unica tion e f fo r ts of the

law y er) " . , , i s co n ce iv ed a s fo llow s: When m e s s a g e s have b een a

m a jo r d e te rm in a n t of re le v a n t and in s tru m e n ta l e f fe c ts , p e r s u a s io n h as

^^D onald C. B ry a n t, "R h e to ric : I ts F u n c tio n s and i t s Scope, " op. c i t . , p . 415.

^'^W allace C. F o th e rin g h a m , F u n c tio n s in P e r s u a s io n (in p r e s s ) .

37

o c c u rre d . " He re c o g n iz e s five c r i t e r i a of p e rs u a s io n ; (1) The e ffec t

m u s t be re le v a n t to the g o a ls sought by the so u rc e of a m e ssa g e ; (2) the

e ffec t m u s t be in s tru m e n ta l , th a t i s , the l i s t e n e r 's re a c tio n is sought a s

a m e an s to fu r th e r b e h a v io r a s opposed to c o n su m m ato ry o r the e ffec t

being an end in its e lf ; (3) the e ffe c t m u s t be the r e s u l t of a m e ss a g e ,

w hich is d e s c r ib e d a s " a s ign o r g roup of s igns (s ig n a ls a n d /o r sym bols)

in ten tio n a lly u sed by a so u rce to a ffe c t a r e c e iv e r ;" ' (4) The fo u rth c r i ­

te r io n dem an d s th a t the r e c e iv e r of the m e ss a g e be f r e e to e x e rc is e

c h o ic e - -a c c e p t o r r e je c t , e tc , ; and the (5) fifth c r i te r io n c a lls fo r the

exchange of m e s s a g e s b e tw een d if fe re n t p e r s o n s , th a t i s , i t i s in t e r p e r ­

sonal.

F o th e rin g h a m v iew s co m m u n ica tio n a s a l a r g e r concep t than

p e rsu a s io n . "T he d iffe re n c e C b e tw een p e rs u a s io n an d co m m u n ica tio n ]

is th a t the e ffe c t of w hat i s sa id l in a co m m u n ica tio n ] m ay not s a tis fy

o th e r c r i te r i a of p e r s u a s io n - - in s tru m e n ta l i ty , s ig n if ic a n t m e ssa g e e ffe c t,

and ch o ice . " F o r the p u rp o se s of th is s tudy , h o w ev er, com m unica tion

w ill a lm o s t a lw ays su g g e s t the m ean in g F o th e rin g h a m g ives to p e rs u a s io n .

N ic h o ls , in h e r r e c e n t book R h e to r ic and C r i t ic is m , d is c u s s e s

rh e to r ic f ro m the h u m a n itie s p e r s p e c t iv e . She b eg in s by r e i te ra t in g the

po in t m ade by m any of th o se w hose th e o r ie s have ju s t b een rev iew ed :

th e re is a "hodge-podge of co n cep tio n s" w ith r e g a rd to rh e to r ic , "One

m ay n a r ro w the f ie ld , " she say s

38

by ru lin g out such a co n cep tio n a s th a t w hich m a k e s rh e to r ic m e re b la n d ish m en ts of a p ro s e p ie c e , o r e x c e s s iv e a e s th e t ic s .We m ay ru le ou t, too , such m o d e rn no tions a s th o se w hich s t r e tc h the concep tion of rh e to r ic to m ea n such th in g s a s the p o w er of the sun to in v ite one o u td o o rs . M o st peop le m ay be w illing to p la c e rh e to r ic w ith th o se a r t s w hich a r e co n ce rn ed w ith w o rd s in som e w ay o r a n o th e r . I tak e rh e to r ic to m ean the th e o ry and the p ra c t ic e of the v e rb a l m ode of p re se n tin g ju d g m en t and ch o ice , know ledge and fe e lin g . A s p e rsu a s io n , i t w o rk s in the a r e a of the con tingen t, w h e re a l te rn a t iv e s a r e p o s s ib le . In p o e tic , i t i s th e a r t of im a g in a tiv e ap p ea l; in s c ie n tif ic d is c o u rs e , i t i s the m ean s of so p re s e n tin g tru th as to f ix i t c le a r ly in the m in d of the l i s te n e r o r r e a d e r .

The p re c e d in g d isc u s s io n s u g g e s ts , then , the m ean in g to be a tta ch ed to

the te r m "co m m u n ica tio n tra in in g " in th is study . I t w as not m e a n t to be

an ex h au s tiv e d isc u s s io n , only one adequate to f a c i l i ta te th is study of

the co m m u n ica tio n ro le in le g a l education .

P e r h a p s the m o s t d iff ic u lt fe a tu re of th is d e fin itio n is th e a c t of

d is c r im in a tin g the p ro c e s s of co m m unica tion f ro m the p r a c t ic e of law

i ts e lf . F o r , m uch th a t i s c o n s id e re d the p ro p e r p ro v in c e of the law

o r ig in a te d in r h e to r ic . R e c a llin g the w ords of T h o m as M . C o U ey --"T h e

law i s , above ev ery th in g e ls e , a com m unicating p r o f e s s io n " - - i t is no t

d iff icu lt to see how th is h a s h ap p en ed . F o r ex am p le , in an c ien t R om e,

w hen C ice ro w ro te h is c la s s ic w o rk s on rh e to r ic h is a im w as th e tra in in g

of la w y e rs m o re th an any o th e r type of s p e a k e r . He w as a g r e a t fo re n s ic

^ ^ M a rie H ochm uth N ic h o ls , R h e to ric an d C r i t ic is m (Baton Rouge : L o u is ia n a S tate U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1963), pp . 7 -8 .

^^The L aw Schools L ook A h ead , op. c i t . , p . 415.

39

sp e a k e r h im s e lf , and w hen he d iv ided rh e to r ic in to five p a r t s - - in v en tio ,

d isp o s itio , e lo cu tio , p ro n u n tia tio , and m e m o r ia - -h e w as th ink ing p r i -

6Tm a r ily of the ta s k s of the law y e r . Law now la y s c la im to In v en tio ,

w hich i s d e s c r ib e d by Thons sen and B a ird a s the a tte m p t of the sp e a k e r

to find out w hat he should say , inc lud ing th e " e n tire in v e s tig a tiv e u n d e r ­

tak in g , the id e a of the s ta tu s [ o r is s u e a s the law y er w ould c a l l i t ] ,

and the m odes of p e r s u a s io n - - lo g ic a l , em o tio n a l, and e th ic a l - - in a l l of

th e ir co m p lex in te r r e la t io n s , C o m p are th is defin itio n w ith the

fo llow ing s ta te m e n t m ade by one study g roup a t the 1959 co n fe ren c e on

le g a l educa tio n .

In d isc u s s in g the q u es tio n of w h e th e r le g a l éducation h a s any unique c h a r a c te r is t ic s th a t d iffe re n tia te law school tra in in g f ro m tra in in g in o th e r f ie ld s of know ledge, an a tte m p t w as m ad e to d e te rm in e the fundam en ta l p u rp o se of le g a l educa tio n . The a d v e r s a ry and d ia le c tic a l n a tu re of th e p ro fe s s io n w as p a r t ic u ­la r ly em p h a s iz e d , and the s k il ls d eem ed m o s t e s s e n tia l to the h ig h e s t q u a lity of p e rfo rm a n c e in the p ro fe s s io n w ere the a b i l i t ie s to an a ly ze , sy n th e s iz e , and th ink c r i t ic a lly , A k een sen se of re le v a n c e , a d a p tab ility , the e x e rc is e of sound ju d g ­m en t founded upon c a re fu l ex am in a tio n and ev a lu a tio n of bo th fa c ts and th e o r ie s , and the a b i l i t ie s to engage in s e lf -e d u c a tio n

° 'H a r r y C aplan ( t r a n s ,) , C ic e ro , A d H eren n iu m (C am b rid g e ; H a rv a rd U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1954), p , 7,

“L e s te r T h o n ssen and A , C ra ig B a ird , Speech C r i t ic is m (New Y ork: The R onald P r e s s Com pany, 1948), p , 79,

40

and to b r in g im ag in a tiv e th ink ing to b e a r on the re so lu tio n of e x is tin g and p o te n tia l p ro b le m s of le g a l s ig n ifican ce w ere a lso c o n s id e re d goals of the le g a l education , ^

S u re ly , C ic e ro w ould have a cc e p te d th a t s ta te m e n t a s a d e sc r ip tio n of

in v en tio ,

R ic h a rd M cK eon, in studying rh e to r ic in the M iddle A g es , a lso

n o tes th is fa c to r of p o r tio n s of rh e to r ic being a s su m e d in to an o th e r d is ­

c ip lin e ,

R h e to r ic i s , a t m o s t, an unu su a lly c le a r ex am p le am ong the a r t s and sc ie n c e s of a ten d en cy w hich a p p e a rs in the h is to ry of rh e to r ic only b ec au se i t i s u n iv e rs a l in in te l le c tu a l d isc ip lin e s .In a p p lic a tio n , the a r t of rh e to r ic co n trib u ted d u rin g the p e r io d f ro m the fo u rth to the fo u rte e n th cen tu ry no t only to the m ethods of sp eak in g and w ritin g w e ll, of com posing l e t t e r s and p e tit io n s , s e rm o n s and p r a y e r s , le g a l docum en ts and b r ie f s , p o e try and p r o s e , b u t to the canons of in te rp re tin g law s and S c r ip tu re , to the d ia le c t ic a l d ev ic e s of d isc o v e ry and p ro o f, to the e s ta b lis h ­m e n t of the sc h o la s tic m eth o d , w hich w as to com e in to u n iv e rsa l u se in ph ilo sophy and theo logy , and , f in a lly , to th e fo rm u la tio n of s c ie n tif ic in q u iry , w hich w as to se p a ra te p h ilo so p h y fro m th eo lo g y . In m a n n e r of ap p lic a tio n , the a r t of r h e to r ic w as the so u rc e b o th of d o c tr in e s w hich have long sin ce b eco m e the p ro p e r ty of o th e r sc ie n c e s (such a s the p a s s io n s , w hich w ere c o n s id e re d in handbooks of rh e to r ic u n til D e s c a r te s p ro p o se d a 'sc ien tific* t re a tm e n t of th em d iffe re n t only in d e ta ils ) and of p a r t ic u la r d ev ice s w hich have b een app lied to a v a r ie ty of sub ­je c ts (such a s to th e 'c o m m o n p la c e s ' w hich w e re so m e tim e s tech n iq u es fo r inven ting a rg u m e n ts , so m e tim e s m e a n s fo r d ila tin g s ta te m e n ts , so m e tim e s m ethods fo r d isc o v e rin g th in g s , o r to 'd e f in itio n ' o r 'o r d e r ' , w hich m ay be d e te rm in e d e n tire ly by c o n s id e ra tio n of the v e rb a l cond itions of e x p re s s io n , the p sy c h o lo g ic a l re q u ire m e n ts of p e rsu a s io n , o r th e c irc u m s ta n tia l p ro b a b ili t ie s of fa c t) . In th e o ry o r ap p lica tio n , the a r t of r h e ­to r ic w as now id e n tifie d w ith , now d is tin g u ish e d f ro m , the whole

^^The L aw Schools Look A head , op, c i t , , p , 27,

41

o r p a r t n o t only of g ra m m a r , lo g ic , and d ia le c tic (w hich w e re , in tu rn , d is tin g u ish e d f ro m o r id e n tif ie d w ith each o th e r) b u t a lso of so p h is tic an d sc ie n c e , of ’c iv il p h ilo so p h y ,* psycho logy , law , and l i t e r a tu r e and , f in a lly , of ph ilo so p h y a s such . Y et, if rh e to r ic i s d efin ed in te r m s of a s ing le su b jec t m a t t e r - - such a s s ty le o r l i t e r a tu r e o r d i s c o u r s e - - i t h a s no h is to ry d u rin g the M iddle A ges; the m an y in n o v a tio n s w hich a r e r e ­c o rd e d d u rin g th a t p e r io d in the a r t s w ith w hich i t i s r e la te d su g g es t th a t th e i r h is to r ie s m ig h t p ro fita b ly be c o n s id e re d w ithou t unique a tta c h m e n t to the f ie ld in w hich th e ir ad v an ces a r e c e le b ra te d .

T h e re fo re , fo r the p u rp o se s of th is s tu d y , the la w y e r’s a c t of finding

the law and f a c ts , of d isc o v e rin g the is s u e s w hich the law a llo w s, and

of a r ra n g in g th em in to a m ean in g fu l op in ion o r a rg u m e n t w ill be re c o g ­

n iz e d a s a u n iv e rs a l p a r t o f both the law and of r h e to r ic . T h is i s the

v e ry s tu ff of le g a l a d m in is tra tio n w hen one e x c lu d es the study of the

ph ilo sophy and h is to r y of the law and i ts r e la t io n to so c ie ty . T h is

study w ill c o n c e n tra te a tten tio n on th e p ro c e s s of la w y e rs em ploying

th is in fo rm a tio n to p e r fo rm the in te n tio n a l a c t of u s in g s ig n a ls and

sy m bo ls to a c c o m p lish such a p u rp o se a s the m o d ifica tio n of b eh av io r

o r the e s ta b lis h m e n t of an a ttitu d e o r opinion in o th e rs .

L e g a l E d u c a tio n

I t i s n e c e s s a r y to c h a r a c te r iz e le g a l ed u ca tio n in the U nited

S ta te s a s opposed to th a t in m o s t o th e r c o u n tr ie s and to le g a l education

R ic h a rd M cK eon, ’’R h e to r ic in the M iddle A g e s , ” C r i t ic s and C r i t ic is m A n c ien t and M o d ern , ed , R , S, C ran e (C hicago: The U n iv e r­s ity of C hicago P r e s s , 1952), pp , 295-296 ,

42

in the p a s t . A s th is s tudy w ill u se ed u ca tio n a l th e o ry and c o m m e n ta ry as

a b a s is fo r in fe re n c e s on th e o r ie s of le g a l r h e to r ic , i t i s n e c e s s a ry to

in d ica te the v a r io u s s o u rc e s of ed u ca tio n a l com m en t.

The p r im a r y fo rc e in A m e ric a n le g a l ed u ca tio n is the law school.

T h is i s a p ro fe s s io n a l in s titu tio n dev o ted to the o b jec t of p re p a r in g p e r ­

so n s fo r the p r a c t ic e of law . W hile m any such sch o o ls a r e s itu a te d

w ith in a u n iv e rs i ty , th ey m u s t be d is tin g u ish ed f ro m the l ib e ra l a r t s

s tu d ie s in law such a s i t s ph ilo sophy , h is to ry , r e la t io n to p o li t ic s and

C o n stitu tio n , b u s in e s s , e tc . In the U n ited S ta te s m o re than anyw here

e lse th e re h a s d ev e lo p ed a group of p ro fe s s io n a l m en who devote fu ll­

tim e to le g a l ed u ca tio n . They have g iven s e r io u s a tten tio n bo th to th e o r ie s

of le g a l a d m in is tra t io n a s w ell a s pedagogy . T h e ir a ssu m p tio n s and

u n d e rs tan d in g of r h e to r ic a l th e o r ie s in law a re e x p re s s e d in the g e n e ra l

ed u ca tio n a l p o lic ie s of law schoo ls; in the se le c tio n of c u rr ic u lu m ; in

the m a te r ia l c o v e re d in c o u rse s such a s those on t r i a l p r a c t ic e , ev id en ce ,

a p p e lla te p r a c t ic e , m o o t c o u r t, p lead in g , and o th e rs w hich m ay o r m ay

no t em p h asize the rh e to r ic a l p ro b le m s of the v a r io u s ta s k s u n d e r study;

in the p re s c r ip t io n of p r e - le g a l s tu d ie s o r the la c k th e reo f; and in the

e s ta b lish m e n t and su p p o rt of p o s t-g ra d u a te p ro g ra m s .

A second fo rc e in le g a l ed u ca tio n w hich w ill be ex am in ed in th is

study is th a t p ro v id e d f ro m the p ra c tic in g p ro fe s s io n i ts e lf . T h a t i s ,

m en who a r e a c tiv e ly engaged in the p r a c t ic e of law seek in v a r io u s w ays

43

to in fluence the c o u rse of p re p a ra tio n of law s tu d e n ts , and in so doing

they su g g est th e ir own th e o r ie s of the rh e to r ic of law . T h is p r a c t ic a l

pedagogy w as , a t one t im e , p a ram o u n t in le g a l education th ro u g h the

a p p re n tic e sh ip sch em e of p re p a ra tio n . In re c e n t t im e s , h o w ev er, the

th e o r ie s of the p ro fe s s io n a t la rg e com e f ro m p ro c e e d in g s and p a p e rs

p u b lish ed by p ro fe s s io n a l o rg an iza tio n s and books w r itte n by su cc e ss fu l

a tto rn e y s reco u n tin g th e i r fav o rite e x p e r ie n c e s and c a s e s ,

A fu r th e r no te should be m ade re g a rd in g A m e ric a n le g a l e d u c ­

a tio n a s c o n tra s te d w ith E n g lish le g a l ed u ca tio n . T ra d itio n a lly , and

c u r re n tly , the U nited K ingdom d iv ides the p ra c tic e of law in to two p a r t s - -

b a r r i s t e r s and s o l ic i to r s . A s is com m only known, b a r r i s t e r s fo rm the

h ig h e r p a r t of le g a l p r a c t ic e , co n c e n tra tin g ex c lu s iv e ly upon t r i a l p r a c ­

t ic e , In fa c t, a p p e a ra n c e s b e fo re the h ig h e r c o u r ts of G re a t B r ita in

a r e r e s t r ic te d to b a r r i s t e r s . S o lic ito rs , on the o th e r h an d , p e r fo rm

the office d u ties co n n ec ted w ith the law and a p p ea r in som e of the low er

c o u r ts u n le ss they choose to engage a b a r r i s t e r fo r th is w o rk a s w e l l - -

w hich i s no t uncom m on. In reco g n itio n of th is d iv is io n , E n g lish le g a l

education i s of two ty p e s and quite d if fe re n t to su it the n eed s of each

d iv is io n .

N e ith e r the d iv is io n of p ra c t ic e n o r the d iv is io n of le g a l education

e x is ts in the U nited S ta te s , A d m iss io n to the b a r of a s ta te q u a lifie s

one to a p p ea r b e fo re the c o u rts of th a t s ta te , and a d m iss io n to the b a r

44

does n o t r e q u ire any sp e c ia l ed u ca tio n fo r t r i a l p r a c t ic e . A lthough som e

p e r s o n s in the le g a l p ro fe s s io n in the U nited S ta te s have no ted a de fac to

sp e c ia liz a tio n of p r a c t ic e in A m e ric a and have th u s c a lle d fo r a fo rm a l

s e p a ra tio n s im ila r to th a t in the U nited K ingdom , th is h a s n e v e r com e

in to b e in g , T h e re fo re , in A m e ric a n le g a l ed u ca tio n no p ro v is io n is

m ad e fo r sp e c ia liz a tio n in t r i a l p ra c t ic e .

O rg an iza tio n of the R em a in d e r of the Study

The s e a rc h in to the o r ig in s of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in leg a l p r a c t ic e

and the ex am in a tio n of c o n te m p o ra ry l i te r a tu r e bo th in law and rh e to r ic

g e n e ra te s q u e s tio n s re g a rd in g the u n d erly in g th e o r ie s of A m e ric a n le g a l

p r a c t ic e :

1) D oes a rh e to r ic a l th e o ry u n d e rlie m o d e rn A m e rica n le g a l

d e c is io n -m a k in g ?

2) If so , w hat c h a ra c te r iz e s th is th e o ry ?

3} If th e re i s a c o n s is te n t th eo ry a s su m e d in the le g a l p r o c e s s ,

does i t s ap p lica tio n a p p ë a r to be v a lid a ted ?

If the p re su m p tio n w hich co m es f ro m a n c ie n t rh e to r ic a l and le g a l

s c h o la rs s t i l l h o ld s - - th a t i s , th a t the a d m in is tra tio n of law th ro u g h the

ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s is p r im a r i ly , if no t a l to g e th e r , a rh e to r ic a l p r o c e s s - -

then one w ould ex p ec t th a t a r h e to r ic a l th e o ry of A m e ric a n ju r is p ru d e n c e

7 lF o r a d isc u s s io n of th is , see "Should A dvocacy be R e s tr ic te d to E x p e r ts ? " , J o u rn a l of the A m e rica n J u d ic a tu re S ocie ty , 19, N o, 3 (O ctober, 1935), p p , 85-89 .

45

e x is ts . If such a th e o ry does e x is t , i t is of in te r e s t to s tu d en ts of r h e ­

to r ic . T h e re fo re , th e o b jec t of th is study is the e x p lo ra tio n of the

q u e s tio n s l i s te d above.

A s th e m a te r ia ls of the s tudy do no t le n d th e m se lv e s to a d iv is io n

p r e c is e ly along the l in e s of the above m en tio n ed q u e s tio n s , i t i s u se fu l

to ex p la in the o rg an iz a tio n w hich th is study w ill fo llow . B e fo re i t is

p ro d u c tiv e to look fo r u n d erly in g rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in A m e ric a n le g a l

p r a c t ic e , i t i s n e c e s s a ry to u n d e rs ta n d fo rc e s in flu en c in g le g a l p r a c t ic e

in the U n ited S ta te s w hich a r e d is t in c t f ro m th o se o p e ra tin g in o th e r

c o u n tr ie s o r in the p a s t . S p e c if ic a lly , i t is in the a r e a of le g a l ed u ca tio n

th a t A m e r ic a n le g a l in flu en ces a r e qu ite d iffe re n t f ro m th o se e ls e w h e re .

The r e f o r ej in C h ap te r II w ill be d is c u s s e d d ev e lo p m en ts in le g a l e d u c ­

a tio n e a r ly in A m e ric a n h is to ry . I t w ill be d is c u s s e d in th is c h a p te r how

the in flu en ce of the p ro fe s s io n i t s e l f upon the le g a l p ro c e s s d im in ish e d

in fa v o r of the law schoo l. T h u s , a lthough the o b je c t of th is study is

the rh e to r ic of le g a l p r a c t ic e o r th e ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s , i t w ill be d is c o v e re d

in C h ap te r II th a t due to the em in en ce and a c tiv ity of law sch o o ls , m uch

of the d a ta fo r the study w ill co m e f ro m le g a l ed u ca tio n .

In C h ap te r IIJ, a m o re d e ta ile d in v e s tig a tio n w ill be m ade in to

m o d e rn A m e ric a n le g a l e d u ca tio n . T h is is done on the b a s is of two

a s su m p tio n s . F i r s t , if a p r im e in flu en ce on the d ire c tio n of the le g a l

46

p ro c e s s in the n a tio n i s p ro fe s s io n a l ed u ca tio n , then a study of the

th e o r ie s u n d e rly in g the p r o c e s s should in c lu d e edu ca tio n . Second, if

th e re i s a c o n s is te n t r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in the p r a c t ic e of law , th en leg a l

e d u c a to rs hav e th e ta s k of s e le c tin g o r id en tify in g i t if they a im to p r e ­

p a re m en fo r p r a c t ic e . A lso , the va lue g iven to r h e to r ic a l th e o ry by

e d u c a to rs w ould c e r ta in ly b e re f le c te d in i t s e m p h a s is in p ra c t ic e by

g rad u a te of th e law sch o o ls . A gain , the fo cu s i s no t to study the pedagogy

of law , b u t to u se i t a s a m e a n s of le a rn in g ab o u t the p ra c t ic e of law .

C h ap te r IV w ill tu rn the in v e s tig a tio n fo r the ex is ten c e and c h a r ­

a c te r of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in le g a l p r a c t ic e to the r e fe re n c e s f ro m the

p ra c tic in g p ro fe s s io n i ts e lf . T hrough the w ritin g s of la w y e rs , the ta sk s

in le g a l p r a c t ic e w ill be ex am in ed and the rh e to r ic a l con ten t and th eo ry

w ill be o b se rv e d .

C h ap te r V w ill be d evo ted to the q u es tio n of the v a lid a tio n of

rh e to r ic in th e le g a l p r o c e s s . U sing bo th the d a ta f ro m p re c e d in g ch ap ­

t e r s a s w e ll a s m a te r ia ls f ro m law and o th e r s c h o la r ly s o u rc e s d ire c te d

sp e c ific a lly to the v a lid ity of the sy s te m of ju r is p ru d e n c e , the q u estio n

w ill be a sk e d w h e th e r ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m a k in g and i t s rh e to r ic a l a sp e c ts

h a s p ro v e d to a c co m p lish i t s s ta te d o b je c tiv e s .

F in a lly , C h a p te r VI w ill p ro v id e a su m m a ry and s ta te m e n t of the

co n c lu s io n s of the study.

C H A PTE R n

RHETORICAL IN FLU EN CES IN EARLY

PRO FESSION A L EDUCATION

A study of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in A m e ric a n le g a l p r a c t ic e should

include su ffic ien t u n d e rs tan d in g of the h is to r ic a l in flu en c es on the p r o ­

fe s s io n to p e rm it an en lig h ten ed study of m o d e rn p r a c t ic e s . Some

d isc u ss io n h a s a lre a d y b een d evo ted to the a n c ie n t th e o r ie s of ju r i s p r u ­

den ce . The rh e to r ic a l th e o r ie s re le v a n t to law , i t h a s b een su g g ested ,

w ere re v e a le d in A r is to t le ’s w o rk s .

Of c lo s e r co n cern to th is study i s the h is to r ic a l in flu en ce of

p ra c t ic e in G re a t B r ita in . T h is w ill be b r ie f ly d is c u s s e d . M ore p a r t i ­

c u la r ly , the in fluence of B r i t i s h le g a l education on A m e ric a n le g a l

education , an d th u s on A m e ric a n le g a l p ra c t ic e w ill be in v e s tig a te d .

F in a lly , w ith the know ledge th a t law is a p ro fe s s io n c o n tro lle d by

p ra c t i t io n e r s , and th a t the th e o r ie s of p r a c t i t io n e r s a r e f i r s t shaped

du rin g p ro fe s s io n a l edu ca tio n , the p a th s to le g a l ed u ca tio n in the U nited

S ta te s w ill be s tud ied . I t i s p a r t ic u la r ly im p o rta n t to d is c u s s the

v a r ia tio n s in leg a l education w hich o c c u r re d in A m e ric a n a s opposed to

47

48

p ra c t ic e s in B r i ta in , S pec ifica lly , the in flu en ce of the law schoo l in

A m e ric a m u s t be u n d e rs to o d b e fo re m o d e rn p ra c t ic e s can be m e an in g ­

fu lly ex p lo red .

T he Influence of G re a t B r ita in

F ro m A r is to t le th rough the p ro d u c tiv e p e r io d of R om an c iv i l i ­

za tio n th e re w as a c lo se a s so c ia tio n b e tw een education in g e n e ra l ,

rh e to r ic a l ed u ca tio n , and le g a l edu ca tio n . To C ice ro and Q u in tilian , the

g re a t R om an w r i te r s on the su b jec t, to be an a d v o c a te - - fo re n s ic o r

o th e rw ise --o n e shou ld be an o r a to r , an d to be an o ra to r one n eed ed a

b ro a d l ib e ra l ed u ca tio n w hich inc lu d ed rh e to r ic a s the cu lm in a tio n of

the p ro c e s s , A lthough G re a t B r ita in ev en tu a lly p ro d u ced n o ted s c h o la rs

of r h e to r ic , i t w as th e re th a t leg a l ed u ca tio n and rh e to r ic a l th e o ry took

se p a ra te p a th s , A fo rm a l sy stem of le g a l education in E n g lan d w as

e s ta b lish e d b e fo re the lead ing w o rk s on r h e to r ic w ere p ro d u c ed in th a t

co u n try , P a u l M , H am lin w r ite s th a t the Inns of C o u rt and C h an cery ,

"v o lu n ta ry , n o n -c o rp o ra te , le g a l s o c ie t i e s ," o r ig in a te d d u rin g the end

of the 13th and the beg inn ing of the 14th c e n tu ry , ^ On the o th e r hand ,

Sandford d is c o v e rs the beg inn ings of rh e to r ic in E ng land to have been

du ring the 16th c e n tu ry w ith the w o rk s of T h o m as Cox, T h o m as W ilson,

^ L e s te r T hons sen . S e lec ted R ead in g s in R h e to ric and P u b lic Speaking {New Y ork: The H, W, W ilson C om pany, 1942), pp , 65 and 99,

2P a u l M, H am lin , I ü E d u c a tio n in C olonial N ew Y ork (New

Y ork: New Y ork U n iv e rs ity Law Q u a r te r ly R eview , 1939), p , 14,

49

and R ic h a rd S h e r ry . ^ When rh e to r ic d id develop , i t w as in the u n iv e rs i ty

and no t in co n n ec tio n w ith le g a l ed u ca tio n . W hile i t i s lik e ly th a t m any

s tu d en ts who s tu d ied rh e to r ic in the u n iv e rs i ty w ent on to the law , th e re

w as no n e c e s s a r y re la t io n b e tw een the tw o .^

The E n g lish in fluence on A m e ric a n le g a l p r a c t ic e w as a n a tu ra l

d ev e lo p m en t of the co lo n ia l re la t io n s h ip . Law p r a c t ic e , and co n seq u en tly

le g a l ed u ca tio n , w as not w ell d eveloped in the e a r ly s ta g e s of co lo n ia l

A m e r ic a . W a rre n , in h is H is to ry of the H a rv a rd Law School, a cco u n ts

fo r th is w ith s ix a rg u m e n ts . F i r s t , he n o te s the r ig id s ta te of the

C om m on Law a t the tim e ; seco n d , la w y e rs a s a c la s s w e re no t a t a l l

p o p u la r w ith the peop le ; th ird , th e re w as a g e n e ra l la c k of p r in te d

m a te r ia ls and e s p e c ia lly a sh o rta g e of le g a l books and r e p o r ts of d e c i­

s ions; fo u r th , in the New E ng lan d m a g is try and the c o u r ts , the c le rg y

w as m o s tly su p rem e and th e re w as l i t t le fo r the law y e r to do; f if th , the

ro y a l g o v e rn o rs ten d ed to in te r f e r e in the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s ; and s ix th ,

the co lo n ia l ju d g es ten d ed to be g e n e ra lly ig n o ra n t, and p a r t ic u la r ly

lack in g in le g a l t ra in in g . H ow ever, a s the A m e ric a n s began to b eco m e

m o re c o n c e rn e d w ith th e ir re la tio n s w ith G re a t B r i ta in and the su b je c t

of th e ir r ig h ts u n d e r com m on law , the la w y e rs m ad e the com m on law

^W illiam P h il l ip s S andford , E n g lish T h e o r ie s of P u b lic A d d re s s , 1530-1828 (C olum bus, Ohio: H aro ld L . H ed ric k , 1938), p . 22.

^ Ib id . , p . 49.

50

m o re and m o re the o b jec t of study. T h u s , i t b ecam e the c u s to m fo r

5fa m il ie s to sen d th e ir sons to E n g lan d to obtain a le g a l ed u ca tio n .

The s tu d ie s fo llow ed once in E ng land w e re d e te rm in e d by the

Inns of C o u rt and C h an cery , T h ese s tu d ie s w e re p u rsu e d by m e a n s of

R e a d in g s , M o o ts , and B o lts . S ince the la te ,13th and e a r ly 14th c e n tu r ie s

the re a d in g s h a d b een d e liv e re d in the h a lls w ith a g re a t ce rem o n y .

T hey c o n s is te d of one of the lead in g p ra c t i t io n e r s being a s s ig n e d to p r e ­

p a re h im s e lf on an a s p e c t of the law , and during the s e s s io n a t the Inn

to r e a d h is r e p o r t . T h ese re a d in g s w e re re g a rd e d a s a u th o r ita tiv e and

w e re f re q u e n tly c ite d in a rg u m e n t a t W e s tm in s te r , ^ H o w ev er, by the

tim e m o s t of the young A m e ric a n s w e re com ing to E ng lan d fo r a le g a l

ed u ca tio n , a ro u n d 1700 and l a t e r , the re ad in g s h ad c e a s e d to be of m uch

v a lu e , and th e p o s itio n of R ea d e r had becom e a s in e c u re . S im ila r ly ,

the M oots an d B o lts w e re e ith e r p o o rly u sed o r no t u se d by the tim e

A m e r ic a n s a r r iv e d to be ed u ca ted . P re v io u s to the 18th c e n tu ry . M oots

h ad b e e n e x e r c is e s in th e n a tu re of fo rm a l a rg u m e n ts on p o in ts of law

r a is e d by the s tu d e n ts , and w ere fo r m an y y e a r s conducted w ith g re a t

c a re in the H a lls of the Inns u n d er th e su p e rv is io n of a B e n c h e r . Two

b a r r i s t e r s w ould s it a s ju d g es fo r the M oots. B o lts w e re s im i la r to

M oots in p re s e n ta t io n and p u rp o se .

^ C h a r le s W a rre n , H is to ry of th e H a rv a rd Law School and of E a r ly L e g a l C o n d itio n s , I. (New Y ork: L e w is P u b lish in g C o ., 1908), pp . 3 -5 .

^ Ib id . , p . 5* ^H am lin , lo c . c it. ^Ibid .

51

A fte r 1700, the Inns continued to d e te rm in e who should be ad m itte d

to the B a r , b u t tra in in g fo r a d m iss io n w as no lo n g e r th e ir ch ie f c o n c e rn .

' A language s im i la r to th a t w hich w as th en affec ting thec h u rch and the u n iv e r s i t ie s of E ngland g ra d u a lly su p erv en ed .until m e r e s t fo rm s su fficed to con fer the d ign ity of advocate and p le a d e r . A ttendance upon R eadings an d M oots w as no t p r e s c r ib e d , and n e ith e r le c tu re s n o r c o u r s e s of study w ere re g u la r ly g iven . ^

The m e re p h y s ic a l p re s e n c e and the ea ting of so m any d in n e rs in the Inn

w as about the ex te n t of B r i t is h le g a l edu ca tio n .

If the Inns p ro v id e d l i t t le in the way of le g a l education , the

q u estio n re m a in s a s to w hat the A m e ric an le g a l s tu d en t in G re a t B r i ta in

did to le a rn h is ch o sen f ie ld . W a rre n in d ic a te s th a t in add ition to

a tten d an ce a t the In n s , th e se s tu d en ts had a t l e a s t two o th e r v a lu ab le

in flu en ces a v a ila b le to th em in E n g la n d - - f i r s t , the opportun ity to r e a d ,

independen tly , the books tiia t w e re no t so a v a ila b le in A m e r ic a , and

10the opportu n ity to o b se rv e the le g is la tiv e and ju d ic ia l sy s te m s a t w o rk .

Of the l a t t e r , W a rre n say s th is :

The f a c i l i t ie s fo r le g a l study supp lied b y the Inns of C o u rt w e re , h o w ev e r, the le a s t of the o p p o rtu n itie s open to young A m e ric a n b a r r i s t e r s in London a t th is t im e . F o r th e se y e a r s , 1750-1775, fo rm e d a p e r io d of re m a rk a b le b r il l ia n c e in E n g lish h is to ry . S tuden ts of law w e re no t only s tudying a t the Inns side by side w ith fu tu re C hief J u s t ic e s , K enyon and E llen b o ro u g h , and the fu tu re C h a n c e llo rs , T hurlow , E ld o n and E rsk in e ; b u t they w e re a ls o lis te n in g to the lum inous ju d g m en ts of L o rd

^Ib id . ^^W arren , 0£ . c i t . , p . 153.

52

M an sfie ld on King*s B ench , to the com m anding e loquence of P i t t (L ord C hatham ) and the o ra to ry of C h a r le s P r a t t (L o rd Cam den); th ey w ere elbow ing, in the Inns th e m s e lv e s , the b u r ly f ra m e of S am uel Jo h n so n , th e a u to c ra t of l i t e r a tu r e ; and they w e re w itn ess in g D avid G a r r ic k ’s ’p o w ers of a c tin g v a s t and unconfined ,

In the footnote to the above s ta te m e n t, W arren q uo tes the co m ­

m en t by C h a rle s J . In g e rs o il of h is f a th e r J a re d In g e rs o il who w as in

the M iddle T em ple in 1 7 7 4 --"M a n sfie ld , B lack s to n e , C hatham and

G a rr ic k and o th e r lu m in a r ie s of th a t p e r io d w ere o b je c ts of h is co n s tan t

a tte n tio n , and of h is c o rre sp o n d e n c e , and e v e r a f te r am ong the p le a s u re s

12of h is m em o ry , "

In re fe re n c e to independen t study of law s tu d e n ts , th e re w as

som e en co u rag em en t th a t i t should in c lu d e the read in g of m a te r ia ls

d es ig n ed to in c u lc a te som e p r in c ip le s of good speak ing . In A H is to ry of

E d u ca tio n fo r the E n g lish B a r ; w ith S uggestions a s to S u b jec ts and

M ethods of Study (1860), P h ilip A n stie Sm ith ta k e s up the q u e s tio n of

the p lace of o ra to ry in le g a l ed u ca tio n , A student who chose to a d d re s s

h im se lf to the study of o ra to ry . Sm ith sa id , ", , , m ay find h is c o u rse

checked by opposition on two d iffe re n t g ro u n d s, " T h a t i s , he could

ex p ec t to h e a r som e say th a t e loquence is " u se le s s in som e c a s e s , and

m isch iev o u s in o th e rs ; o r , when i t s v a lu e i s a d m itted , m ay find i t

t r e a te d a s a p o w er, w hich i s p o s s e s s e d , indeed , by som e g ifted m in d s .

^^Ibid, l^ Ib id ,

53

b u t i s beyond the re a c h of en d e a v o r, A d m ittin g th a t the b a r r i s t e r

should avo id a p p ea ls to the fe e lin g s and p a s s io n s . Sm ith s t i l l a d v ise s

the law s tu d en t to study o ra to ry . He say s th a t i t i s a s m uch a p a r t of

the a r t of o r a to ry th a t a b a r r i s t e r be ab le to say w hat m u s t be s a id in

the b r ie f e s t and c le a r e s t m a n n e r .

U sing l e t t e r s f ro m e s ta b lis h e d b a r r i s t e r s to s tu d en ts , au th o r

Sm ith goes on to s ta te h is c a s e th a t o ra to ry can be le a rn e d . H is a r g u ­

m e n ts , h o w ev e r, s tro n g ly su g g es t th a t S m ith ’s co n cep t of le a rn in g the

a r t of o ra to ry i s la rg e ly confined to g ra m m a r and sty le :

If i t be a d m itte d th a t e loquence is a d e s ir a b le q u a lifica tio n fo r a b a r r i s t e r , th e re s t i l l r e m a in s the q u e s tio n w h e th e r i t be p o s s ib le to a c q u ire i t . In r e fe re n c e to th is m a t te r , som e e x tr a c ts sh a ll f i r s t be g iven w hich re co m m e n d , in e x p re s s t e r m s , the d ire c tio n of s tu d ie s to such an o b je c t. One of th e se o c c u rs in a le t te r f ro m S ir W illiam , th en M r, Jo n e s , to L o rd A lth o rp e . He te l ls h im th a t, w ith h is know ledge a s w e ll a s ju d g m en t, he w ill e a s ily a c q u ire h a b its of e loquence; *but h a b its th ey a r e , no l e s s th an p lay in g on a m u s ic a l in s tru m e n t o r hand ling a p en c il: and a s the b e s t m u s ic ia n s and f in e s t p a in te r s b eg in w ith p lay ing so m e tim e s o u t of tune and d raw in g out of p ro p o rtio n , so the g r e a te s t o r a to r s m u s t b eg in w ith leav in g som e p e r io d u n fin ish ed , and p e rh a p s w ith s ittin g down in the m id d le of a se n te n ce , . . , I am , . , p e rsu a d e d , th a t a v ir tu o u s and knowing m an , who h a s no n a tu ra l im p ed im en t, m ay b y h a b it a c q u ire p e r fe c t e lo q u en ce , a s c e r ta in ly a s a h ea lth y m an , who h a s the u se of h is m u s c le s , m ay le a r n to sw im o r sk a te . ’

^^P h ilip A n stie S m ith , A H is to ry of E d u c a tio n fo r the E n g lish B a r ; w ith S u ggestions a s to S u b jec ts and M ethods of Study (London: B u tte rw o r th s , 1860), p . 117.

14I b id . , p . 122,

54

T h is book , d e s ig n e d to be u s e d a s a p a r t of the in d ep en d en t study of a

young law s tu d e n t, c o m p le te s the ch a p te r on e loquence w ith a s e r ie s of

p o in te rs on the a r t of rh e to r ic d raw n f ro m the w ritin g s of C ic e ro , Q u in ­

t i l ia n , and the lead ing m e m b e rs of the E n g lish B a r ,

S ig n ifican tly , th is book , w r itte n fo r the u se of law s tu d en ts in

E ng land d u rin g and im m e d ia te ly follow ing the g re a t p e r io d of p ro d u c ­

tiv ity of E n g lish rh e to r ic ia n s (1776-1828) does no t m en tio n any of the

E n g lish w r i te r s on the su b je c t. R a th e r , a f te r p a s s in g r e fe re n c e to the

two R om an rh e to r ic ia n s and le g a l e d u c a to rs , Sm ith p ro c e e d s to d raw

m o s t of h is p r in c ip le s on the p r a c t ic e of le g a l speak ing f ro m the

co m m en ts and e x p e r ie n c e s of p ra c tic in g la w y e rs . T h is , w hich does no t

seem to be uncom m on d u rin g th e t im e , s tro n g ly su g g e s ts a s t r i c t

s e p a ra tio n in E ng land b e tw een the rh e to r ic ia n s and the b a r r i s t e r s .

P a th s to L e g a l E d u ca tio n in A m e ric a

A s th e A m e ric a n c o lo n ie s b ecam e m o re w ealthy and c o m m e r­

c ia lly a c t iv e , the o p p o rtu n ity to ob ta in books in c re a s e d . W ith the

p u b lica tio n of B lackstone*s C o m m e n ta r ie s in 1765, th e re w as a d ec id ed

in c re a s e in the am ount of le g a l study tak ing p lace in A m e r ic a , C h a rle s

W a rre n p ro v id e s th is a n a ly s is of the n a tu re of e a r ly A m e ric a n law and

le g a l ed u ca tio n

W hen the R evo lu tion b ro k e out and the C o lon ies w e re th row n ab so lu te ly on th e ir own r e s o u r c e s , a m o v em en t b eg an in s e v e ra l

55

of th e i r ed u ca tio n a l in s titu tio n s to in tro d u ce the s tudy of law a s a p a r t of the g e n e ra l sy s te m of education; and v a r io u s law p r o fe s s o r s h ip s w ere e s ta b lish e d during the l a s t tw enty y e a rs of the 18th c e n tu ry , though w ith sm all s u c c e ss .

T h en cam e a p e r io d of re a c tio n . The old p re ju d ic e s of the e a r ly 17th C en tu ry w ere re v iv e d ag a in s t la w y e rs in the c lo sing y e a r s of the 18th C en tu ry , A v io len t o p position to anything E n g lish , and e sp e c ia lly to the E n g lish Com m on L aw D o c tr in e s , sw ept o v e r the U nited S tate s - -w hich la s te d w ith v a ry in g fo rce u n til a f te r 1810, Then cam e the W ar of 1812 and the ensuing c o m m e rc ia l d i s t r e s s and p a n ic s , d iv e rtin g a tte n tio n fro m a ll fo rm s of ed u ca tio n . M eanw hile , the e a r ly y e a r s of the 19th C en tu ry w e re the g re a t fo rm a tiv e p e r io d of A m e r ic a n Law; A m e ric a n law re p o r ts w ere be ing in tro d u ce d , an d A m e rica n law b o o k s w r itte n . And i t w as un d er the sp u r of the d e s ire to teach young m en A m e ric a n law sy s te m a tic a lly an d m o re tho­rough ly th an they could be tau g h t in law office th a t the A m eric an Law S chools a ro s e ,

"A s th e re w ere in the C olon ies no co lleg ia te law le c tu re s b e fo re

1780, and no law schoo ls b e fo re 1784, the young m an who a s p ire d to be

a law y e r, " sa y s C h a rle s W a rre n , "had two c o u rse s open to h im , " "T he

f i r s t , " sa y s W a rre n , "w as to p ic k up such s c ra p s of know ledge of p r a c ­

tic e , a s he co u ld , by se rv in g a s a co p y ist o r a s s i s ta n t in the c le r k 's

office of som e in fe r io r c o u rt, and by read ing such b o o k s . Coke ch ie fly ,

a s he could b o r ro w , An exam ple of one who d id th is type of study

who is a lso of in te r e s t to s tu d en ts of public speak ing i s P a t r ic k H enry ,

Som e few young m en of p re -e m in e n t na tiv e a b ility ach ieved d is tin c tio n w ithout tra in in g even in a c le r k ’s o ffice . Thus P a t r ic k H en ry w as ad m itted to the B a r in Sept, 1760 a t the age of 24, a f te r bu t s ix w eek ’s s o lita ry study of Coke upon

^ ^ W a rre n , o£, c i t , , pp , 5 -6 , * I b id , , p , 131,

56

L ittle to n and the V irg in ia S ta tu te s , a lthough one of the th re e e x a m in e rs , G eorge W ythe, re fu s e d to sign h is l ic e n s e , leav ing i t to P ey to n and John R andolph to ad m it. The la t te r s a id they ‘p e rc e iv e d h im to be a young m an of g en iu s, v e ry ig n o ra n t of law b u t d id n o t doubt he w ould soon qualify h im se lf . ‘

The second m eth o d of obtain ing a le g a l education in th o se d ays b e fo re

law sch o o ls w as to e n te r the office of a lead ing m e m b er of the B a r ,

try in g to find one who owned a good l ib r a r y . The o b jec t w as to ab so rb

by read in g and w atch ing a s m uch of the law a s p o ss ib le . O ccas io n a lly ,

the law y er w ould tak e tim e fo r d i r e c t teach in g of h is s tu d e n ts , b u t th is

d oes not a p p e a r to have b een a com m on o r ex ten s iv e p r a c t ic e .

In the o ffic e , the s tuden t h ad a c c e s s to a ll h is s e n io r 's law books fo r study . He p o red o v e r the MSS, v o lu m es of fo rm s , and the a b s t r a c t s , com m onplace b o o k s , and MSS, n o te s of c a s e s , w hich each law y er of th o se days m ade fo r h im se lf ,, , , He w as ex p ec ted to copy out p lead in g s and o th e r d o cu ­m en ts fo r h is s e n io r , and to d ra f t b r ie f s . In r e tu rn , the law y er gave to h is s tuden t such ad v ice , in fo rm a tio n , o r in s tru c tio n a s h is tim e o r h is w h im p e rm itte d .

A s a r u le , the law y er w as too b u sy a m an to pay m uch a tten tio n to h is s tu d en ts ; and the ch ie f advan tage ga in ed by th em w as in p e r s o n a l a s so c ia tio n w ith th e ab le la w y e rs a g a in s t whom he t r ie d h is c a s e s , and in the g e n e ra l in fluence w hich g r e a t c h a r a c te r s h av e on younger m en who com e in co n tac t w ith th em ,

T h is d e sc r ip tio n of law study in the o ffice i s not a s c o m p lim e n ta ry a s i t

m ig h t have b een h ad i t been s ta te d by m any of the p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s

d u rin g the y e a r s b e fo re the 20th C en tu ry , I t should no t be su g g ested

th a t th e re w as w id e sp re a d d is s a tis fa c tio n w ith law office s tudy . On the

^"^Ibid,, pp , 131-132, IS jb id ,, p . 133.

57

c o n tra ry , th is c o n flic t b e tw een law sch o o l and law office ed u ca tio n p e r ­

s is te d fo r m an y , m any y e a r s , C h a r le s W a rren m ay be fo rg iv en if he

o v e rs ta te d the o b jec tio n ab le f e a tu re s of th is type of le g a l e d u c a tio n - -

h is p r im e o b jec tiv e w as to w rite the h is to ry of the H a rv a rd L aw School,

and fo r y e a r s th e r e w as d ire c t c o n f lic t b e tw een the sch o o ls and the

o ffice s .

T h is c o n flic t in ph ilosophy of ed u ca tio n w ill be d is c u s s e d l a te r ,

b u t fo r the t im e , a t l e a s t one p o s itiv e s ta te m e n t should be re c o rd e d .

B en jam in e F , B u t le r , w ritin g h is P la n fo r the O rg an iza tio n of a Law

F acu lty in the U n iv e rs ity of the C ity of N ew Y o rk , f i r s t p u b lish ed in

1835, sa id th is : "T he g re a t n u m b er of L aw o ffices in th is c ity , in w hich

a v a r ie d and in s tru c t iv e b u s in e ss i s c a r r i e d on, w ill a c c o rd f a c i l i t ie s

fo r the a c q u is itio n of p ra c t ic a l know ledge w hich m ay be tu rn e d to g re a t

19acco u n t, " T h is w as sa id even d u rin g the tim e of the g r e a t d ev e lo p ­

m e n t of the law sch o o ls .

To su m m a riz e the p ro c e s s of le g a l ed ucation p r io r to the grow th

of A m e ric a n law sc h o o ls , the young m a n had , a t f i r s t , the n eed to go to

E ng land to study in the In n s , r e a d the av a ilab le b o o k s, and o b se rv e the

a c tiv e le g a l scen e in G re a t B r i ta in . L a te r , w hen th is fo rm of education

b ecam e im p o ss ib le b e ca u se of the s p li t b e tw een A m e ric a an d E n g lan d , the

^^B en jam ine F , B u tle r , P la n fo r the O rg an iza tio n of a L aw F a c u lty in the U n iv e rs ity of the C ity of N ew Y ork (New Yo rk : Law C en te r F o u n d atio n , 1956), p . 14,

58

stu d en t of law e ith e r in d ep en d en tly re a d w hat w as a v a ila b le , e n te re d the

office of a c le rk , o r r e a d in the office of a p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y . C le a r ly ,

each of th e se fo rm s of le g a l ed u ca tio n p u t the c o n ce n tra tio n upon the

a c q u is itio n of p r a c t ic a l know ledge of the law . The equ ipm ent of a la w ­

y e r th u s t ra in e d w as e x p e r ie n c e in doing and w atch ing the fu n c tio n s of

law p r a c t ic e . M ost of h is a c tu a l know ledge of the law he p ick ed up a s

i t b e c a m e av a ila b le to h im th ro u g h h is l a t e r p r a c t ic e . If such a m an

w as a cq u a in te d w ith the p r in c ip le s of rh e to r ic o r if he had e x p e rie n c e

in sp eak in g , i t w as e i th e r the r e s u l t of o b s e rv a tio n of sp e a k e rs a t w o rk ,

the c a s u a l read in g of the sp e e c h e s of p re v io u s o r a to r s , o r he m ay h ave

h ad som e e x p e rie n c e in h is p re v io u s fo rm a l ed u ca tio n . I t is t r u e , a s

W a rre n n o te s , th a t m o s t of th e law y ers of th e s e e a r ly tim e s cam e f ro m

the a r i s to c r a c y and had b e n e f itte d fro m a co lleg e education . H ow ever,

th e re w as ab so lu te ly no g u a ra n te e th a t a m an a d m itte d to p ra c t ic e a t

th is t im e had any such know ledge o r e x p e r ie n c e .

T he L aw School

The law school d ev e lo p ed along two l i n e s - - f i r s t , p ra c tic in g

a tto rn e y s who w ere v e ry p o p u la r w ith s tu d en ts b egan to a t t r a c t th em in

la rg e n u m b e rs u n til the law office took on a s p e c ts of the law school;

seco n d , u n iv e rs it ie s w e re developed w hich in c lu d ed one o r m o re

^ ^ W a rre n , o£. c i t . , p . 153.

59

p ro fe s s o r s h ip s in law . The f i r s t , and m o s t fam ous law schoo l of the

f i r s t type w as e s ta b lis h e d in L itc h f ie ld , C o n n ec ticu t in 1772 a t the office

of law y er T apping R eeve . R eeve s e ttle d in the s m a ll C on n ec ticu t town to

p ra c tic e law , n o t fo rm a schoo l, b u t a s the R evo lu tion fo rc e d young m en

to seek th e i r le g a l education in the U nited S ta tes r a th e r th an in E ng land ,

m o re and m o re s tu d en ts sought out p ra c tic in g la w y e rs who would p ro v id e

th em w ith the n eed ed education . By the end of the R ev o lu tio n , R eeve

21“ . . . found h im se lf a t the h ead of a fu lly d eveloped law schoo l. "

T h is h a s beco m e known a s the L itch fie ld Law School. O th e r s im ila r

schoo ls d eveloped d u rin g the sam e tim e . E s s e n tia l ly , th is school w as

l i t t le d if fe re n t f ro m office tra in in g w ith two e x c e p tio n s -- th e studen ts

w e re m o re n u m ero u s and had the opportun ity to exchange id e a s and

le a rn f ro m each o th e r , and the law y er a t the h ead of the schoo l devoted

m o re of h is tim e to teach in g th a t w as tru e in m any o ffice s of busy p r a c ­

tic in g a t to rn e y s . R eed m ak es the follow ing g e n e ra liz a tio n about the

su b jec t:

The e a r ly p r iv a te law schoo l w as e s s e n tia l ly a sp e c ia liz e d and e la b o ra te d law office . I t o r ig in a te d in New E n g lan d , w here the a p p re n tic e sh ip sy s tem w as m o s t f irm ly e s ta b lis h e d , sp re ad f ro m th e re in to o th e r s ta te s , and w as ev en tu a lly n o t so m uch d e s tro y e d a s ab so rb ed by the co llege o r u n iv e rs i ty law school, w hose c h a ra c te r i t la rg e ly d e te rm in e d . A s a fu lly developed .

^ ^ A lfred Z an tz in g e r R eed , T ra in in g fo r the P u b lic P ro fe s s io n of the L aw , B u lle tin No. 15 (New Y ork; C arneg ie F o u n d a tio n fo r the A d v ancem en t of T each ing , 1921), p . 128.

60

s e lf -c o n sc io u s in s titu tio n , announcing i ts e lf a s such , i t a p p e a re d s lig h tly l a te r than the e a r ly so u th e rn co lleg e law schoo l. U nlike th is a r t i f ic ia l c re a t io n , h o w ev er, i t developed by im p e rc e p tib le s tep s ou t of a p r a c t i t io n e r 's c la s s and r e p re s e n ts a m o re p r im itiv e type of ed u ca tio n a l o rg a n iz a tio n ,^ ^

A s e a r ly a s the R evolu tion , th e re w as som e ev id en ce of in te r e s t

on the p a r t of c o lle g e s and u n iv e r s i t ie s to e s ta b lish som e teach in g of

law . In 1777, the C onnec ticu t A ssem b ly o ffe red to endow p ro fe s s o r s h ip s

of law , m e d ic in e , and o ra to ry a t Y ale C ollege in r e tu rn fo r a s h a re of

c o n tro l of the c o lle g e . The Y ale C o rp o ra tio n w as unw illing to give up

any s h a re of i t s p o w e r, and so d e c lin ed the o ffe r , "D u rin g the nex t

f ifteen y e a r s the Y ale P re s id e n t , E z r a S tile s , gave an o c c a s io n a l l e c ­

tu re on law , b u t a p p a re n tly only fo r the c u ltu ra l value of th e su b jec t,

A ccord ing to R eed , i t is T hom as J e f f e r s o n who d e s e rv e s c r e d i t fo r

in itia tin g " u n iv e rs i ty in s tru c tio n in p ro fe s s io n a l law in th is co u n try ,

He re o rg a n iz e d the C ollege of W illiam and M ary in 1779 and in c lu d ed

p ro fe s s o r s h ip s of law . One w as P r o f e s s o r of "M o ra l P h ilo so p h y and

the L aw s of N a tu re and of N a tio n s , " and the o th e r , u n d er the d ire c tio n

^^Ib id ,

2 3 ju liu s G oebel, J r . , and the S taff of the F o u n d atio n fo r R e s e a rc h in L eg a l H is to ry , A H is to ry of the L aw School of Law C o lum bia U n iv e r­s ity (New Y ork: M orn ing side H eig h ts: C olum bia U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1955), p . 10,

^^Ib id , R eed , 0£ , c i t . , p , 116.

61

of G eorge W ythe, P r o f e s s o r of "L aw and P o lic e , The f i r s t r e c o rd e d

law d e g ree a w a rd e d in the U nited S ta te s w as 1793 a t the C ollege of

W illiam and M ary .

In 1794, J a m e s K ent w as app o in ted P r o f e s s o r of Law a t C olum bia

C ollege la rg e ly a s a r e s u l t of h is p o li t ic a l a s s o c ia t io n s , a lthough K ent

took the job s e r io u s ly . W hat w as p ro p o se d w as d e sc r ib e d in the

pub lic an n o u n cem en t of the ap p o in tm en t.

T h is p ro fe s s o r s h ip i s in ten d ed to c o m p ris e a b r ie f rev iew of the h is to ry , the n a tu re , the s e v e ra l f o rm s , and the ju s t ends of c iv il g o v e rn m e n t- -a sk e tc h of the o r ig in , p r o g r e s s , and f in a l s e tt le m e n t of th e U n ited S ta te s - - a p a r t ic u la r d e ta il of the o rg a n iz a tio n and d u tie s of th e s e v e ra l d e p a r tm e n ts of the g e n e ­r a l g o v e rn m en t, to g e th e r w ith an e x am in a tio n of such p a r t s of the c iv il an d c r im in a l cod es of the f e d e ra l ju r is p ru d e n c e . . . the c o u r ts of th e s e v e ra l s ta te s . . . and the m o re p a r t ic u la r ex am in a tio n of the C o n stitu tio n of the S ta te . The w hole d e ta il of ou r m u n ic ip a l law , w ith re la t io n to the r ig h ts of p ro p e r ty and of p e r s o n s , and th e fo rm s of a d m in is te r in g ju s t ic e , b o th c iv il and c r im in a l , w ill th en be t r e a te d fu lly and a t la rg e . 28

Of p a r t ic u la r i n t e r e s t h e r e is the ph ilo so p h y K en t h e ld re g a rd in g the

ro le of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in le g a l ed u ca tio n . In h is f i r s t le c tu r e , he

d e m o n s tra te d bo th a f a m il ia r i ty w ith Q u in tilian an d a co n ce rn fo r the

rh e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of le g a l p r a c t ic e .

A la w y e r in a f r e e c o u n try , should have a l l the re q u is i te s of Q u in til ia n 's o r a to r . He should be a p e r s o n of i r r e p ro a c h a b le v ir tu e and g o o d n ess . He should be w e ll r e a d in the whole c ir c le of the a r t s an d s c ie n c e s . He should b e f it fo r the a d m in is ­tra tio n of p u b lic a f f a i r s , and to g o v ern the com m onw ealth by h is

^ Ib id . ^^G oebel, o£. c i t . , p . 14. ^^Ibid .

62

councils s ic . J , estab lish i t by his laws and c o r re c t i t byh is exam ple. . . . [The law yer] ought to be well read in the G reek and Roman c lass ic s ; he ought to have a knowledge of the civil law; he ought to develop his pow ers of close r e a ­soning by study of logic and m athem atics; he ought to be well grounded in the doctrines of m o ra l philosophy; and he ought to have acquired the a r t of public speaking. Upon such a foundation should he e rec ted h is education in the m unicipal law,

This f i r s t s e rie s of lec tu re s in the law a t Columbia is variously

d escrib ed as a " re la tiv e success" and as a "fa ilu re , Before K ent's

second se rie s of lec tu re s was delivered in 1824, the H arvard Law

School, ", , , the f i r s t collegiate school of law now in ex istence, ' was

31founded in M assachusetts in 1817. " However, as A lbert J , Harno

says in h is h isto ry of legal education published as a p a r t of the Survey

of Legal Education of the A m erican B ar A ssociation, "Growth and deve­

lopm ent in these early schools cam e haltingly. The common method of

p rep ara tio n fo r the p ro fession s till was through office apprenticeship,

"Law yers clung tenaciously, " Harno re la te s , "to the notion that legal

education was nothing m ore than the m astering of a c ra ft, the skills for

which had to be p assed on from the p rac titioner to the novice. And that

view was to continue for some y e a rs yet to come, "

^^Ibid, , pp, 14-15, ^®Goebel, og, c i t . , p , 20; Reed, op, c i t , , 120.

^^W arren, o£, c i t , , p , 1,

A lbert J , H arno, Legal Education in the United States (San F ran cisco ; Bancroft-W hitney C o ,, 1953), p, 39,

33lbid,

63

P ro fe s s io n a l a s so c ia tio n s . - - In p a s s in g f ro m a g e n e ra l d isc u ss io n

of the p a th s to a le g a l education in A m e ric a b e fo re th e 20th C en tu ry to

a sp ec ific ex am in a tio n to the a c t iv it ie s of the law sc h o o ls , a b r ie f

co m m en t ought to be m ade co n cern in g e a r ly p ro fe s s io n a l a s so c ia tio n s .

In lie u of the kind of a s so c ia tio n am ong p e rs o n s of s im i la r in te re s ts

w hich w as la te r to com e w ith the co lleg e l i t e r a r y so c ie ty and the law

clubs of the law sch o o ls , the p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s so m e tim e s fo rm ed

such s o c ie tie s a f te r being a d m itte d to p r a c t ic e . T h e re w as , betw een

1770 and 1774, such an a s so c ia tio n in New Y o rk C ity c a lle d The M oot,

I t w as founded a s a club "to en co u rag e a m o re p ro fo u n d and am ple study

of the c iv il law , h is to r ic a l and p o li t ic a l ju r is p ru d e n c e , and the law of

n a tu re , , , , The C o n stitu tio n of th is club n o te s th a t a t ev e ry

m ee tin g any m e m b e r w as p e rm it te d to p ro p o se a q u es tio n of law to be

debated by the club a t the fo llow ing m e e tin g . If m o re th an one q u estio n

w as p ro p o se d , the p re s id e n t took a vo te of the m e m b e rs ,

A n o th er s im ila r o rg a n iza tio n w as fo rm e d a ro u n d 1768 in New

Y o rk C ity ca lled The D ebating S ocie ty , F ro m i t s C o n s titu tio n , i t is

le a rn e d th a t i t s d eb a te s w e re c o n s tru c te d to co n fo rm to the sty le of the

law c o u r t - - a n a ffirm a tiv e opened the d eb a te , fo llow ed by a s ta te m e n t by

the n e g a tiv e , then th e re w ere r e b u tta ls and c o n c lu s io n s . Q u estio n s

^ ^ W arren , 0£ , c i t , , p , 161,

H am lin , op. c it , , p , 201,

64

w ere cho sen in a m an n e r s im ila r to th o se in The M oot, Som e of the

to p ic s d eb a ted w e re , "W hether in an ab so lu te m o n arch y i t is b e t te r th a t

the C row n should be e lec tiv e th an h e re d i ta ry ;" "W hether the King is

ju s tif ia b le in T o ro C o n scien te fo r r e s e rv in g a y e a r ly Q u itre n t fo r ev e ry

100 a c r e s of land he g ra n ts ;" 'W hether in the C on stitu tio n of G rea t

B r ita in i t w ould be a good p o lit ic a l m ax im th a t the King can do no w rong ;"

"W hether the L aw s ought to co m p el a su b je c t to a c c e p t of a pub lic e m ­

p loym en t, I t i s p o ss ib le th a t th is so c ie ty w as a s s o c ia te d w ith K ing’s

C ollege and th a t i ts p ro p e r nam e w as the K ing’s C ollege D ebating

e . ^ 37 Society.

T h e se o rg an iz a tio n s a r e of p a r t ic u la r in te r e s t in th is study b e ca u se

they w e re , a p p a re n tly , the only a tte m p t d u ring the e a r ly d ay s in A m e ric a

to dup lica te the a n c ien t m o o ts in the Inns of G re a t B r i ta in , and w ere an

o u tle t fo r a fe l t n eed by p ra c tic in g la w y e rs to im p ro v e th e m se lv e s in the

com m unica tion of to p ic s re la te d to law and p o li t ic s . The s im ila r i ty

betw een th e se so c ie tie s and the debate p ro g ra m s w hich w e re la te r to be

developed in A m e ric a n co lleg es and u n iv e rs i t ie s can n o t be e scap ed .

M oot c o u r ts and law c lu b s , - -P ro b a b ly the m o s t p e r s i s te n t way in

w hich A m e ric a n law schoo ls h ave a tte m p te d to p ro v id e the law studen t

w ith p r a c t ic a l tra in in g in rh e to r ic i s the u se of m oo t c o u r ts and law

3 6 ib id ,, p , 204, S=7lbid,

65

c lu b s . G eo rg e W ythe, the f i r s t P r o f e s s o r of L aw in the U nited S ta te s ,

in c lu d ed in h is p ro g ra m a t the C o lleg e of W illiam and M ary m o o t l e g i s ­

la tu r e s and s im ila r p r a c t ic a l a c tiv itie s ,^ ® Ja m e s K en t, w hose w ork

a t C olum bia b eg an sh o rtly a f te r 1777, in s titu te d a "m o o t o r debating

c lu b " d u rin g h is second s e r ie s of le c tu r e s in 1824-1825. K ent m e t

w ith h is p r iv a te s tu d en ts e v e ry S a tu rd a y and they d is c u s s e d in w r itte n

o r s e t sp eech es a th em e w hich had b e e n a ss ig n ed the p re v io u s w eek.

A sa h e l S te a rn s , f i r s t P r o f e s s o r of Law in the H a rv a rd Law

School w hen i t w as founded in 1817, show ed a s im ila r in t e r e s t in the

m o o t c o u r t p ro g ra m and o th e r m e th o d s of p ro v id in g co m m u n ica tio n

tra in in g . A lthough m o s t of the s tu d e n ts du ring th is tim e (1817-1840)

h ad h ad n e a r ly two y e a r s of o ffice s tu d y , and thus w e re ex p ec ted to be

w e ll g ro u n d ed in the te c h n ic a l d e ta ils of p r a c t ic e . P r o f e s s o r S te a rn s

s t i l l fe lt the need fo r devoting a m a jo r i ty of the law s tu d e n ts ’ tim e to

p r a c t ic a l tra in in g . T h is could be in te rp re te d th a t he re c o g n iz e d a

d iffe re n c e b e tw een know ing the fo rm a l p ro c e d u re s and p r a c t ic e s of

c o u r ts and le g a l do cu m en ts and b e in g p re p a re d to engage su c c e ss fu lly

in th e r h e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of law p r a c t ic e . W hile th is m ay seem to be

an obvious d is tin c tio n to som e r e a d e r s , i t h a s p ro v e d to be r e g u la r ly

co n fu sed , a c c e p te d , r e je c te d , e tc . b y A m e ric a n law sch o o ls .

®®Reed, o£. c i t . , p . 117. ^^G oebel, op . c i t . , p . 20.

^ ^ W arren , o£. c i t . , II, p . 333.

66

To em p h a s iz e the im p o rta n c e P r o f e s s o r S te a rn s placed, upon th is

type of e d u ca tio n , of the five p a r t s of the H a rv a rd Law School c u r r ic u ­

lum re p o r te d in 1825, two m en tio n ed le c tu r e s in law and r e c i ta t io n s

and ex am s in law . T he rem a in in g p a r t s w e re a s follows:

A M oot C o u rt in w hich q u es tio n s a r e r e g u la r ly a rg u e d (often a t c o n s id e ra b le leng th ) b e fo re the P r o f e s s o r , who p ro n o u n ces an op in ion . In th e s e f ic ti t io u s a c tio n s the p le a d in g s , b i l l s of e x c e p tio n s , d e m u r r e r s to ev id en ce , sp e c ia l v e rd ic ts and m o tio n s in a r r e s t of ju d g m en t o r fo r a new t r i a l a r e d raw n up in fo rm by the s tu d e n ts . - -D uring the a rg u m e n t th e se s tu d en ts who a r e no t of c o u n se l a r e em ployed in tak in g m in u te s , w ith a v iew to th e a c q u is itio n of fa c ility and a c c u ra c y p r e p a ra to r y to p r a c t ic e . The c a s e s to b e a rg u e d a r e , of c o u r s e , ad ap ted to the p r o g re s s of the re sp e c tiv e s tu d e n ts in th e i r p ro fe s s io n a l s tu d ie s . B u t th ey a r e s tro n g ly u rg e d to engage in th em v e ry soon a f te r th e ir co m m en cem en t; i t hav ing b e en found b y e x p e r ­ie n ce th a t no o th e r e x e rc is e i s so p o w erfu l an e x c ite m e n t to in d u s try and em u la tio n o r so s tro n g ly in te r e s t s the s tu d en ts in th e i r p ro fe s s io n a l p u r s u i ts .

D ebating C lubs inc lud ing a l l the m e m b e rs of the L aw School in w hich som e q u e s tio n (g en e ra lly in m o ra l p h ilo so p h y , p o li­t ic a l econom y, o r c iv il policy) w hich a d m its an ex tended and f r e e d isc u s s io n , is d eb a ted once a w eek w ith a v iew to im p ro v e ­m e n t in e x te m p o re e lo cu tio n .

W ritte n d is s e r ta t io n s by the s tu d en t upon som e t i t le o r b ra n c h of the law o r the h is to ry of som e d e p a r tm e n t of le g a l o r p o li t ic a l sc ie n c e ,

A t C olum bia C o lleg e , sh o rtly a f te r K ent co m p le ted h is second

s e r ie s of le c tu r e s , a new L aw School w as fo rm e d un d er the d ire c tio n of

T h eo d o re W, D w ight, He fo llow ed the p a t te rn s e t by K ent and by S te a rn s

a t H a rv a rd and in h is f i r s t announcem en t he sa id th a t m o o t c o u r ts w ould

42lbid,

67

b e h e ld in the ty p ic a l f a s h i o n . T w o y e a r s la te r h is announcem en t i s

m o re sp e c ific .

Two M oot C o u rts a r e h e ld e v e ry w eek , a t each of w hich a cau se p re v io u s ly a s s ig n e d i s a rg u e d by four s tu d e n ts , two fo r each c la s s . The C o u rt c o n s is ts of the p re s id in g P r o fe s s o r , w ith w hom a r e a s s o c ia te d the two m e m b e rs of the S en io r C la ss who h ad a c te d a s C ounsel in the C ase p re v io u s ly a rg u ed . The a s s o c ia te Ju d g es d e liv e r w r itte n opin ions one w eek a f te r the a rg u m e n t, and the cau se is th en concluded by an opinion d e liv e re d by P r o f e s s o r D w ight. 44

In 1829, Jo se p h S to ry b ecam e Dane P r o fe s s o r of Law a t H a rv a rd

L aw School. In h is opening a d d r e s s . S to ry s e t a p a tte rn in fav o r of

co m m u n ica tio n tra in in g a s s tro n g a s th a t of K ent a t C olum bia, He sa id

th is , a s c ite d in H arn o ,

T he s tu d en t m u s t have a th o ro u g h know ledge of the p r in c ip le s of the law ; b u t th a t in i t s e l f is no t su ffic ien t. He should not im ag in e . . . th a t enough is done, if he h as so f a r m a s te re d the g e n e ra l d o c tr in e s of the com m on law , th a t he m ay e n te r w ith som e confidence pinto p r a c t ic e . T h e re a r e o th e r s tu d ie s , w hich dem and h is a tte n tio n . He should ad d ic t h im se lf to the study of p h ilo so p h y , of r h e to r ic , of h is to ry , and of hum an n a tu re . I t i s f ro m a w ant of th is e n la rg e d v iew of duty , , , th a t th e p ro fe s s io n h a s so m e tim e s b een re p ro a c h e d w ith a so rd id n a r ro w n e s s , w ith a low ch ic an e , w ith a cunning a v a r ic e , and w ith a d efic ien cy in l ib e ra l and en lig h ten ed p o licy . 45

'T h e p o rtio n of the L aw School w ork in w hich S to ry ch iefly d e lig h ted , " says

W a rre n , "w as the M oot C o u rts . "4^

4 ^ G o eb e l, o£. c i t , , p , 38,

4® H arno, 0 £ , c i t , , p , 45,

4^ W a rren , op, c i t , , p , 70,

68

T h ese M oot C o u rts had been one of the p r in c ip a l f e a tu r e s of the Law School u n d e r P r o fe s s o r S te a rn s ; and h is r e p o r ts . . . show how la rg e an am ount of t im e w as devoted to th e m .U nder S to ry and A shm un, h o w ev er, th ey re c e iv e d ev en g r e a te r a tten tio n . T hey w e re h e ld in the le c tu re room once a w eek , g e n e ra lly on F r id a y , in the a fte rn o o n ; a s ta tem en t of f a c ts w as d raw n up by the P r o f e s s o r the w eek b e fo re the a rg u m e n t, and two co u n se l a s s ig n e d to each s id e , one fro m the S en io r c la s s and one f ro m the Ju n io r c la s s e s , e a c h of the studen ts in the School re c e iv in g a c a se in ro ta tio n , a c co rd in g to h is s tan d in g .L a te r , w hen the n u m b e rs of the S chool in c re a s e d so la rg e ly , i t w as found n e c e s s a ry to ho ld two an d even th re e c o u r ts in a w eek,

Two tim e s a y e a r , the Law School h e ld m ock ju ry t r i a l s in w hich

they a tte m p ted a s m u ch a s p o ss ib le to re p ro d u c e an a c tu a l t r i a l . The

s tuden ts d rew lo ts to d e te rm in e who w ould a c t as counse l and the

rem a in in g s tu d en ts s e rv e d a s w itn e s s e s , ju ry , o r took n o te s f ro m the

aud ien ce . A ll the o th e r a c tiv itie s of th e schoo l w ere su sp en d ed fo r the

t r i a l and th e re se e m s to have b een q u ite a fe s tiv e a ir su rro u n d in g the

o ccas io n . To give an id ea of the a tm o sp h e re which p re v a ile d , W arren

quotes f ro m a l e t t e r se n t h im by R ic h a rd H. D ana, J r . c o n ce rn in g the

b e s t sp eech es g iven d u rin g h is s tay a t th e school.

The m o s t s u c c e ss fu l speech m ad e a t the School d u rin g the w hole tim e I w as th e r e , w as m ad e b e fo re a ju ry of u n d e r - g r a - d u a te s . Judge S to ry on the B en ch , b y W m. M. E v a r ts . A law a rg u m e n t w hich he in tro d u ce d in to i t , a d d re sse d ^o the C o u rt, w as the m o s t c o m p le te , s y s te m a tic , p re c is e and e leg a n tly spoken law a rg u m e n t I have e v e r y e t h e a rd , including m an y a rg u m e n ts of o u r m o s t d is tin g u ish e d co u n se l b efo re o u r h ig h e s t c o u r ts . E v a rts* ju ry a rg u m en t w as v e ry w ell done, b u t W m.

^^ ib id . ^® Ib id ., p . 71.

69

D av is of P ly m o u th , who w as h is opponent, did qu ite a s w ell to the ju ry . E v a rts* w as the b e s t law , and D a v is ’ the b e s t ju ry , a rg u m en t I h e a rd in the School, When ch arg in g the ju ry . Judge S to ry sa id he m u s t ru le the law in c e r ta in p o in ts a g a in s t th e d e fen d an t’s c o u n se l (E v a rts ) though they h ad b e e n a rg u e d to h im ’in a m a n n e r to w hich I c h e e rfu lly do h o m ag e . * Judge S to ry a lw ay s co m p lim en ted l ib e ra l ly , b u t n e v e r w en t so f a r a s in th is in s ta n c e . Indeed , E v a r ts h a s b ee n a p e c u lia r young m an a t sch o o l, c o lle g e , and in h is p ro fe s s io n a l s tu d ie s . If he d o es not becom e d is tin g u ish e d , he w ill d isap p o in t m o re p e rs o n s th an any o th e r young m a n whom I have e v e r m e t w ith .

The M oot C o u rts en joyed w ide p o p u la r ity w ith the s tu d en ts u n til

a ro u n d 1848. T hen , the in te r e s t seem ed to d ec lin e o r v a ry . One

su g g estio n w as th a t the in tro d u c tio n of p r iz e s fo r d isp u ta tio n w as the

cau se of lo s s of in te r e s t in M oot C o u rts . T h is w as though t of a ro u n d

1855 .^^ "In 1879, the s tu d en ts h ad lo s t in te r e s t so la rg e ly th a t the

M oot C o u rts w e re su sp en d ed . L a te r , th ey w e re re su m e d , b u t s t i l l ,

a p p a re n tly , w ith nothing n e a r the s u c c e ss known b e fo re 1848. One

p r o fe s s o r , speak ing b e fo re the A m e ric a n B a r A s so c ia tio n , in 1892,

m ade th is o b se rv a tio n :

The M oot C o u rts a r e n o t v e ry su c c e s s fu l . I w ish they w e re m o re so. I t is w e ll fo r the s tu d en ts to a rg u e in a som ew hat m o re fo rm a l m a n n e r a s they w ill b e fo re the fa c u lty , r a th e r th an to confine th e m se lv e s to th e ir c lu b s . M oot c o u r ts u se d to b e co m p u lso ry , b u t th e re w e re so m an y e x c u se s th a t we h ave g iven up the co m p u lsio n . They a r e r a th e r dw indling. We h av e ex p e rim e n te d w ith p r a c t ic e c o u r ts . L a s t y e a r we t r ie d M rs , M ay b rick w ith a ju ry f ro m the u n d e rg ra d u a te s and i t w as

^ 9 ib id , , pp. 7 1 -7 2 . ^O lb id ., p . 218.

S l lb id , , p . 328,

70

qu ite s u c c e s s fu l . B u t to m ake th a t k in d of th ing a s u c c e s s is p r e t ty h a rd w o rk fo r the P r o fe s s o r who h a s to g e t up the ev id en ce on bo th s id e s ,

F in a lly , in 1897, the M oot C o u rts w e re d isco n tin u ed a lto g e th e r ,

though W a rre n n o te s th a t the Law C lubs h ad tak en o v e r the fo rm e r

p o p u la r ity of the M oot C o u rts .

The f i r s t L aw Club se em s to have b een fo rm e d a t H a rv a rd

a ro u n d 1825, h o w ev er r e c o rd s a r e n o t v e ry a c c u ra te and i t is n e c e s s a ry

to r e ly on te s tim o n y of m e m b e rs of the club w ritin g in I860 , The

R e c o rd B ook of th is c lu b - -T h e M a rsh a ll C lu b -- fo r the y e a r s I860 to

1876 h a s b een p r e s e r v e d , and W a rre n u s e s i t to d e s c r ib e the n a tu re

of the c lu b .

The R e c o rd B ook of the M a rsh a ll Club . . . co n ta in s . , , the follow ing s ta te m e n t: ’In o r ab o u t the y e a r A , D, 1825, c e r ta in s tu d en ts of the Dane Law School, d e s iro u s of im p ro v in g th e m se lv e s in th e study of the L aw an d f ittin g th e m se lv e s to b eco m e m o re re a d y in a rg u m en t and m o re tho rough in r e s e a r c h , and a t the sam e t im e , d e s iro u s of cu ltiv a tin g f r ie n d ly i n t e r ­c o u rs e and s o c ia l a m en ity one w ith a n o th e r , o rg a n ize d th e m se lv e s in to a L aw Club o r so c ie ty , and adopted a s th e ir d is tin g u ish e d a p p e lla tio n the nam e of the M a rsh a ll C lub, , . , *

A cco rd in g to o th e r r e c o rd s , the s ta te d p u rp o se of th e se c lubs w as

to d is c u s s c a s e s and p o in ts of law and u se th is p r a c t ic e in con junction

w ith the s tu d ie s of the c u r r ic u lu m . T h is w as e n co u rag ed by the F a c u lty

^^Ibid , ^^Ibid , , p . 321,

^^Ib id . ^ ^ Ib id ,, p . 319.

71

of the School, A s an ex am p le , the a c tiv it ie s of the M a rsh a ll Club

u su a lly w ere h e ld each w eek in the a fte rn o o n . P r i o r to the m e e tin g ,

the C le rk w as to a s s ig n two m e m b e rs to p r e p a re a c a se fo r a rg u m e n t

and a s ta te m e n t of f a c ts of th e c a s e . The C le rk a ls o appoin ted a m e m ­

b e r to a c t a s ju d g e . Once the two m e m b e rs who w e re to a c t a s

co u n se l had co m p le ted the s ta te m e n t of f a c ts , the C le rk pu t i t on f ile

in the l ib r a r y fo r a l l to re a d in advance . A t the m e e tin g , of c o u r s e ,

the c a se w ould be a rg u e d and a d ec is io n re n d e re d by the studen t ju d g e .

By 1873-1874 the College C atalogue cou ld c la im th a t a lm o s t

e v e ry m e m b e r of the School belonged to a c lu b , of w hich th e re w e re

tw elv e . The g row th in n u m b er and ac tiv ity of th e c lu b s is su g g es ted a s

COa s tro n g re a so n fo r the dec lin e of in te r e s t in the M oot C o u rts . The

fa c t th a t a lm o s t a l l the s tu d en ts be longed to a c lu b , and not a l l w as

p ro b ab ly no t a r e s u l t of the ind iv idual students* ch o ice . A lthough the

h is to r ie s of H a rv a rd do no t say so e x p lic itly , th e r e i s s tro n g r e a s o n to

su sp e c t th a t th e so c ia l a s p e c t of the c lubs o ften outw eighed the a c a d e m ic

in te r e s t s . T h e re i s no d en ia l th a t belonging to the " r ig h t" club w as

im p o rta n t, and the b la c k b a ll sy s te m of a d m iss io n of new m e m b e rs w as

in u s e , T h is cou ld have b een a sign of l e s s in te r e s t in the a c tu a l

^ ^ Ib id ., p , 322, ^ '^Ib id ,, pp . 327-328,

58lbid. , p , 322, 5 9 Ib id . , p . 413,

72

p ra c t ic e of c a se s fo r s tu d en t im p ro v em en t. In a r e p o r t of 1878, b y the

V is itin g C o m m ittee , O liv e r W endell H o lm es , J r . a d d re s s e d h im se lf to

th is questio n .

I t i s s ti l l g round fo r r e g r e t th a t M oot C o u rts a t t r a c t le s s a tten tio n than fo rm e r ly . The fa c t i s in p a r t due to the im p ro v ed o rg an iza tio n of the Club C o u rts w h ere i t i s now the p ra c t ic e to have a bench of s e v e ra l judges in s te a d of one a s fo rm e r ly .T h is ad d s to the in te r e s t and th o ro u g h n ess of the d isc u ss io n ; and , a s the s tu d en ts a r e engaged in c a s e s v e ry f re q u e n tly , the Club C o u rts a r e m o re im p o rta n t th an th o se p re s id e d o v e r by the P r o f e s s o r s , w h e re the s u p e r io r ity of the judge is o ffse t by the r a r e r e c u r r e n c e of o p p o rtu n itie s fo r any one p e rso n to be h e a rd .

Y our c o m m ittee a r e of the opin ion th a t the p ra c t ic e of d raw ing counsel by lo t in s te a d of sp e c ia lly a ss ig n in g th e m a s w as fo rm e r ly the p r a c t ic e i s one of the c a u s e s of the l i t t le in te re s t now fe l t . . . .&0

A nother h is to ry of the H a rv a rd L aw School in d ic a te s th a t a t no

tim e did the F ac u lty a tte m p t to in c re a s e the n u m b er of law c lu b s o r to

su p e rv ise thena. I t g o es on to po in t ou t, "T he Pow Wow Club, w hich

w as long the m o s t p ro m in e n t in the School, w as s ta r te d abou t 1870. "

A fte r th is , s e v e ra l o th e r s w ere fo rm e d , sa y s th is au th o r . He go es on

to com m en t on the so c ia l n a tu re of the c lu b s , "T he th re e o r fo u r m o s t

p ro m in en t c lubs s e le c te d the a b le s t m e n in the c la s s , and so m e tim e s

even d rew m en aw ay f ro m the new er and le s s im p o rta n t ones to f i l l

v a c a n c ie s . M em b ersh ip in one of the b e s t c lu b s w as a su b s ta n tia l

^°Ibid.

73

h o n o r . S im ila r co m m en ts could be m ade about the law clubs a t

C olum bia. W hile i t i s d iff ic u lt to d is a g re e w ith O liv e r W endell

H o lm es , J r . , i t i s n o t e a sy to a c c e p t the fa c t th a t s tu d e n t- ru n so c ia l

c lu b s , b a se d upon so c ia l p r e s t ig e , and d raw ing the a b le s t m en in to one

o r two top clubs and leav in g the r e s t fo r the o th e r c lu b s could be a s

e ffec tiv e an in s tru m e n t fo r educating s tu d en ts in the p r a c t ic a l and co m ­

m u n ica tiv e a s p e c ts of le g a l p ra c t ic e a s w ould a s im i la r p ro g ra m u n d er

fa c u lty su p e rv is io n , g u id an ce , and in s tru c tio n , and d es ig n ed to s p re a d

the w o rk and value equally am ong a l l the s tu d en ts . N e v e r th e le s s , th is

w as the s itu a tio n in m o s t of the b e s t law sch o o ls in the U nited S ta tes

d u rin g th is tim e .

P r a c t ic a l A sp e c ts of the L aw C u rr ic u lu m

F i r s t , to b e s u re th a t the m ean ing of the w o rd " p ra c t ic a l" is

u n d e rs to o d in th is co n tex t, le t i t be s a id th a t in the te rm in o lo g y of le g a l

ed u ca tio n , anything d es ig n e d to h e lp a law s tu d en t l e a r n to apply the

le g a l p r in c ip le s he h a s s tu d ied in the a c tu a l p r a c t ic e of law is c a lle d

p ra c t ic a l . O bviously , th en , in th is se c tio n no t a l l p r a c t ic a l a s p e c ts of

the c u rr ic u lu m a r e to be ex am in ed . Only th o se a s p e c ts of the c u r r ic u ­

lum w hich have a v a lu e in re v e a lin g rh e to r ic a l th e o ry w ill b e exam in ed .

^^The C en ten n ia l H is to ry of the H a rv a rd L aw School, 1817- 1917 (C am bridge; The H a rv a rd Law School A s so c ia tio n , 1918), p . 145,

^^G oebel, op. c i t , , p . 38.

74

In H a m lin 's L eg a l E d u c a tio n in C olonial New Y o rk , the f i r s t

u se fu l a t te m p t to p r e s c r ib e a c o u rse of study fo r law s tu d en ts in A m eric a

a p p e a r s . T h is w as w ritte n b y W illiam Sm ith in ab o u t 1756. A lthough

i t w as no t in ten d ed fo r a sp ec ific school of law , i t i s , n e v e r th e le s s , the

f i r s t a tte m p t to s e t fo rth a law c u r r ic u lu m . In i t . Sm ith d iv id es the

tra in in g of a la w y e r in to the s tu d y of s ix s c ie n c e s , in c lu d ed am ong

w hich is "L o g ick and R h e to r ic k . " Sm ith su g g ested rea d in g a book ca lled

th e A r t of Speak ing , w ithou t no ting the a u th o r.

M o re d ire c t ly a s s o c ia te d w ith a law schoo l, b u t s t i l l no t ac tu a lly

a p a r t of a law schoo l c u r r ic u lu m , i s the in fo rm a tio n co n ta in ed in the

f i r s t o ffic ia l an n o u n cem en t of the founding of the H a rv a rd L aw School.

H e re , a g r e a t d e a l of s t r e s s w as la id on the advan tage to be en joyed by

the law s tu d e n ts , " th ro u g h the p r iv ile g e ex tended to th em of a ttend ing

the l e c tu r e s of the co lleg e p r o f e s s o r s . " "A nd i t can n o t be d o u b te d ,"

co n tin u es C h a r le s W a rre n , " th a t th is p r iv ile g e fo rm e d a c o n s id e ra b le

in d u cem en t and a t t r a c t io n to th o se who jo in ed the School. " W a rre n h as

g a th e re d to g e th e r in h is book m uch te s tim o n y of f o rm e r s tu d en ts to the

e x ten t to w hich th ey a v a iled th e m se lv e s of th is o p p o rtu n ity and of the

v a lu e th ey saw in i t . P e rh a p s a s s ig n ifican t a s the fa c t of the p riv ile g e

i s the id en tity of p ro fe s s o r s th a t W a rre n m en tio n s .

^^H am lin , og. c i t . , p . 197.

75

Of the P r o f e s s o r s of the C ollege a t th is t im e , i t h a s b een sa id th a t they fo rm e d 'a g roup of m en u n equalled in A m e r ic a in v a r ie d cu ltiv a tio n and the l i te r a r y s p ir i t . '

Jo h n Q uincy A d am s had b een ap p o in ted B oy lston P r o f e s s o r of R h e to ric and O ra to ry , in 1806, a d is tin c tly adv an ced step in in te l le c tu a l t ra in in g , of w hich h is two v o lu m es of le c tu r e s s t i l l give p ro o f. He w as su cceed ed , in 1809, by Jo sep h M cK ean, w hose p lace in tu rn w as tak en , in 1819, by E d w ard T . C hanning, of w hom i t h a s b een sa id ’no A m e ric a n p ro fe s s o r e v e r e x e r ­c is e d so p ro lo n g ed and unqu estio n ab le a l i t e r a r y in fluence o r tra in e d so m any d is tin g u ish ed a u th o rs .

In 1857, C olum bia U n iv e rs ity e s ta b lis h e d a sy s te m u n d er w hich a

s tu d en t a i t e r th re e y e a r s ' a tten d an ce , cou ld s e le c t one of th re e sch o o ls:

L e t te r s , S c ien ce , and Ju ris p ru d e n c e . In the School of J u r is p ru d e n c e

the s tu d e n ts , then in th e i r fo u rth y e a r , w ould be in s tru c te d in M odern

H is to ry ; P o l i t ic a l E conom y; the P r in c ip le s of N a tu ra l and In te rn a tio n a l

Law ; C iv il and Com m on Law; C icero de L e g ib u s , de O r a to re , de O ffic ii s;

P la to de R upublica; A r is to t le ’s R h e to ric and L ogic; C h e m is try . T h is

w as to be acco m p an ied by a m oot co u rt p ro g ra m .

T h u s , th e re w as som e e ffo rt to p ro v id e law s tu d en ts w ith tra in in g

in the p r in c ip le s of rh e to r ic a p a r t f ro m the p r a c t ic e p ro g ra m s of the

m oo t c o u r ts . H ow ever, in sp ite of H a rv a rd Law S ch o o l's n o tice of the

value of h e a r in g o th e r p ro fe s s o r s in the C o lleg e , and in sp ite of Jo sep h

S to ry 's co m m en ts on the value of rh e to r ic to the law s tu d en t. H a rv a rd

did not develop a s a le a d e r am ong law sch o o ls in p ro v id in g such a

l ib e ra l c u r r ic u lu m . "W hat S tory did fo r the ad v an cem en t of le g a l

6 4 w a r re n , og. c i t , , pp. 329-330. ^^Q ogbel, og, c i t . , p . 27.

76

ed u ca tio n , " says H a rn o , " is < • • a su b jec t fo r d eb a te , " "T h a t he did

no t su b s ta n tia lly l ib e ra l iz e the c o u rse of in s tru c tio n , " th is au th o r co n ­

tin u e s , " is c le a r . L ib e ra l s tu d ie s , if tak en a t a l l w hile the studen t w as

p re p a r in g fo r the b a r , h ad to be p u rsu e d b e fo re he began h is law

s tu d ie s . A d iffe re n c e of ph ilo sophy , w hich w ill be d isc u s se d la t e r ,

Lne x is te d e a r ly b e tw een H a rv a rd and Y ale to w ard le g a l education . Y ale

a tte m p te d to te a ch a m o re p ra c t ic a l co u r se - -de signed to p ro v id e a

c o u rse of study p a t te rn e d a f te r the o ffice w o rk , b u t an im p ro v e m e n t on

i t . In th is ph ilo sophy , i t w as co n ce rn ed w ith developing a rh e to r ic a l

th e o ry of le g a l p r a c t ic e . R e p re se n ta tiv e of th is th e o ry is W illiam C.

R o b in so n ’s F o re n s ic O ra to ry A M anual fo r A d v o ca tes . R obinson,

p r o fe s s o r of law a t Y ale U n iv e rs ity w ritin g in 1893, e x p re s s e s the u n d e r ­

ly ing ph ilosophy of h is book in the P re fa c e .

I have w r itte n th is book in o rd e r to a s s i s t law s tu d en ts and young la w y e rs in p re p a r in g th e m se lv e s to d isc h a rg e in a p ro p e r m a n n e r th e ir d u tie s a s ad v o c a te s . F o r m o re than fo rty y e a r s I have b een a f re q u e n te r of c o u r t- ro o m s , and have stud ied the m o d es in w hich th e t r i a l s of c a u se s a r e conducted f ro m the v a r io u s p o in ts of v iew of a sp e c ta to r , a c o u r t o f f ic e r , a p a r t i c i ­pa tin g co u n se l, an d a ju d g e . The conv iction w as long since fo rc e d upon m y m in d th a t the en o rm o u s w as te of tim e and e n e rg y involved in th e se p ro c ee d in g s i s due to a w ant of m ethod in p re p a r in g and p re se n tin g c a u s e s , w h ereb y the co n flic ts of the fo ru m , w hich should c o n s is t in the co n ce n tra tio n of w ell o rd e re d fo rc e s on the e x ac t p o in ts of a tta c k and d e fen se ,

^^H arno , op. c i t . , p . 47. ^^R eed , o£. c i t . , p . 156.

^®W illiam C. R ob inson , F o re n s ic O ra to ry A M anual fo r A dvo­c a te s (B oston: L i t t le , B row n , and C om pany, 1893),

77

d e g e n e ra te in to a g u e r i lla w a r fa re of in d e fin ite d u ra tio n , c h a ra c te r iz e d by i r r e g u la r and often f ru i t le s s s a ll ie s , s u r ­p r i s e s , and r e t r e a t s . A cting upon th is conv ic tion , and seek ing fo r the m eth o d in w hich a le g a l c o n te s t ought to be conducted ,I w as led to c o m p a re the m o d es of o p e ra tio n , adopted by a d v o ca te s who h a d b eco m e n o ted fo r the c e le r i ty w ith w hich th ey won th e ir c a s e s , w ith the m eth o d and the ru le s p r e s c r ib e d by w r i te r s on th e A r t of F o re n s ic O ra to ry , e sp e c ia lly by C ic e ro and Q u in tilia n , and b ec am e s a tis f ie d th a t, w hh ther co n sc io u s ly to th e m se lv e s o r no t, th e se ad v o ca tes p u rsu e d th a t m eth o d and obeyed th o se r u le s . If th is be tru e , nothing i s m o re d e s ir a b le than th a t young ad v o ca te s should be w ell t r a in e d in the p r in c ip le s and p ra c t ic e of th is a r t , and fo r th a t p u rp o se I have b ro u g h t to g e th e r in th is vo lum e the su b stan ce of w h a tev e r I have found a lre a d y w r itte n on the su b jec t, and of such a d d itio n a l c o n c lu s io n s a s I have d e r iv e d f ro m p e rso n a l o b s e rv ­a tio n and e x p e r ie n c e . T h a t i t m ay h e lp to s e rv e th is p u rp o se , and a lso m e e t w ith som e a p p ro v a l f ro m ad v o ca tes who a r e q u a lified to judge of i ts m e r i t s and d e fe c ts , m o d esty d oes no t fo rb id m e to h o p e .

B ut by no m e a n s would I le a d the s tu d en t to b e liev e th a t h is ex am in a tio n of th e A r t of F o re n s ic O ra to ry should b e confined to the t r e a t is e w ith w hich he i s h e re p re s e n te d . On the co n ­t r a r y , the study of L o g ic , R h e to r ic , and E lo cu tio n , on a f a r m o re ex ten s iv e sc a le th an the l im its of th is volum e p e r m it , I m u s t s tre n u o u s ly reco m m en d . N o r is th e re a w ork on A dvo­c ac y o r on any one of i ts su b o rd in a te to p ic s , n o r any book of T r ia l s , n o r any ab le novel in Ayhich the o p e ra tio n s of sk illfu l a d v o c a te s and d e te c tiv e s a r e d e s c r ib e d , th a t he m ay no t p ro fita b ly re a d a s i l lu s tr a t in g and apply ing the ru le s and m e th o d s w hich th is m an u a l in c u lc a te s and ex p la in s . ^9

R obinson o p e ra te s u n d er the th e s is th a t a lthough som e of the

g r e a t ch a llen g es and m o m en ts of o ra to ry m ay belong to the p a s t , i t i s

s t i l l a b so lu te ly e s s e n t ia l th a t the ad v o ca te know the p r in c ip le s of o ra to ry .

R e g a rd le s s of the n a tiv e ta le n t a young m an m ay h av e , he s a y s , the

p e r fo rm a n c e of le g a l advocacy r e q u ire s the u se of fa c u ltie s "w hose

^ ^ Ib id ,, pp . v -v ii .

78

developm en t d ep en d s a lm o s t e n tire ly upon a r t i f ic ia l tra in in g , " I t is

fo rtu n a te fo r the ad vocate th a t the m e th o d s w hich co n s titu te the a r t of

o ra to ry "have b e e n the su b jec t of in v e s tig a tio n f ro m the dawn of c iv iliz ed

so c ie ty , and m an y of the ru le s in w hich th ey a r e e x p re s se d a r e m o re

v e n e ra b le th an th o se of any o th e r s c ie n c e ." D uring th ese a g e s , he sa y s ,

th e re h as b een no change in hum an n a tu re ; the s tim u li w hich m oved

m en to ac tio n in a n c ie n t G reece a r e s t i l l s im ila r ly e ffec tiv e fo r m o d ern

m an . "A ll the acc u m u la te d know ledge of the p a s t , w ith a l l the i l lu s tr io u s

ex am p les of the ap p lica tio n of th a t know ledge, th u s lie b e fo re the o ra to r

of o u r day fo r h is gu idance and in s tru c tio n . " "He is con fused , " says

R obinson, "by no dil&fersities of th e o ry , m is le d by no con flic ting ru le s

of p r a c t ic e . H is te a c h e r s , an c ie n t and m o d e rn , a re in h a rm o n y bo th a s

to the cond ition of in te l le c t and w ill in to w hich he m u s t en d eav o r to lead

h is h e a r e r , an d a s to the m eth o d s by w hich th a t condition is to be p r o ­

duced . " A ll th a t is lack ing is the d e s ir e and m o tiv a tio n on the p a r t of

the studen t to l e a r n . I t i s conceivab le th a t R ob inson’s g en e ro u s

c la im s a s to the v a lid ity and r e l ia b il i ty of h is th e o r ie s m ig h t h ave con­

tr ib u te d to the re lu c ta n c e of o th e r p r o fe s s o r s of law to b e liev e in th e ir

v a lu e and a g re e to th e i r in c lu sio n in the law school c u r r ic u lu m . B ut

th is i s only c o n je c tu re .

^ ^ Ib id . , pp . 3 -4 .

79

R ob in so n ’s book is d iv ided in to two p a r t s - - th e f i r s t s e ts fo rth

the th eo ry and p ra c t ic e of o ra to ry in g e n e ra l , and the second p a r t seek s

to apply tha t th e o ry to the fo re n s ic s itu a tio n . W hile he g iv es c r e d i t to

C ice ro and Q u in tilian fo r h is in s p ira t io n beyond the le g a l p ro fe s s io n

its e l f , i t is c le a r th a t he w as in flu en ced by the B r i t i s h th e o r ie s of public

speaking of C am p b e ll, B la ir , and W hately . F o r ex am p le , he d iv id es

the a r t of o ra to ry in to two p ro c è s s e s --c o n v ic tio n and p e r s u a s io n , w hich

71is a B r it ish c o n tr ib u tio n to rh e to r ic a l th e o ry . He s ta te s th a t o ra to ry

"m oves the W ill by P re se n tin g the Id e a s C a lcu la ted to E x c ite those

E m otions w hich W ill P ro d u ce the A c t D e s i r e d ," w hich is an o th e r o ff­

sp rin g of fa c u lty psycho logy f ro m the B r i t i s h p e r io d , F ro m Q u in tilian

he ob tains the id e a of the o ra to r b e in g a good m an , and f ro m A r is to t le ,

th rough C ice ro and Q u in tilian , he d iv id es o ra to ry in to ju d ic ia l , d em o n ­

s tra t iv e , and d e lib e ra tiv e , W ith r e g a rd to the d iv is io n s .o f o ra to ry ,

the au tho r d raw s ch ie fly fro m C ic e ro by ca lling th em In v en tio n , E x p r e s ­

sion , A rra n g e m e n t, and D e liv e ry . T h ese a re defin ed e s s e n tia l ly a s

the Rom an r h e to r ic ia n s would h av e , w ith e x p re ss io n tak in g the p la c e of

s ty le , and m e m o ry being o m itted .

In h is ap p lic a tio n of th e se th e o r ie s to the fo re n s ic s itu a tio n ,

R obinson b eg in s w ith inven tion , defin ing i t a s " , , , the a c t by w hich an

'^^Ib id ., p , 18, '^^ ib id ., p , 9,

7 3 l ^ . , pp . 32-46; 17, 7 4 ib jd ,, pp . 56-57 ,

80

o r a to r p ro d u c e s in h is own m ind the id e a s w hich a r e to be em ployed in

h is o ra tio n , A fte r s tr e s s in g the n eed to app ly the id e a s of the

fo re n s ic o ra tio n to the h e a r e r s , the au th o r d is c u s s e s the id e a s s e r v ic e ­

ab le in fo re n s ic o ra to ry . T hey a r i s e , he s a y s , a lw ays f ro m the i s s u e s

in the cau se and a lw ay s include the id ea of a duty to b e p e r fo rm e d , A

7 Agood d ea l of a tte n tio n is devo ted to the d is c o v e ry of the i s s u e s . In

d isc u s s in g a rg u m e n t, the au th o r d ev o tes h is a tte n tio n a lm o s t e n t ire ly

to in a r t i s t ic p ro o fs - - w itn e s s e s , d o cu m en ts , e tc , and to to p ic s o r co m m o n ­

p la c e s , bo th co n cep ts o r ig in a lly a t tr ib u ta b le to A r is to t le , S ig n ifican tly ,

th is book p ro v id e s no m en tio n of the a s p e c t of a rg u m e n t w hich A r is to t le

thought to b e m o s t im p o rta n t: en th y m em es. One page is devo ted to

the sy llo g is tic fo rm , and one exam ple is g iv en , b u t th e re i s l i t t le d i s ­

c u ss io n of the p ro b a b ility fa c to r , no d is c u s s io n of the fo rm s of en thym em e

a s th ey m ay a p p e a r in a rg u m e n t, and no d is c u s s io n of the lo g ic of the

fo rm ,

A fte r speak ing g e n e ra lly on the a r ra n g e m e n t of id ea s and the

o rd e rin g of th em fo r the co m p le te o r a to r ic a l a c t of the c o u r tro o m , a s

i t i s d e s c r ib e d , R obinson d iv id es the fu n c tio n s of the t r i a l in to su b ­

d iv is io n s : q u a lific a tio n s of w itn e sse s ; tra in in g w itn e sse s ; d i r e c t

^^I b id , , p . 59, ^^I b id , , pp , 59-65 ,

^^I b id . , pp , 65 -85 . ^^I b id , , pp , 97-103,

81

ex am in a tio n of w itn e s s e s ; c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of w itn e s s e s ; r e - d i r e c t

e x am in a tio n . T he r e m a in d e r of the book c o n c e rn s i t s e l f w ith s ty le ,

d e l iv e ry , and som e id e a s on the p a r t s and p re p a ra t io n of an o ra tio n ,

R o b in so n 's F o re n s ic O ra to ry is in fo rm a tiv e to th is study in a

n u m b e r of w ay s . P r im a r i ly , i t s tan d s a s an ex am p le of an e ffo r t to

r e la te fo rm a l le g a l ed u ca tio n and r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in a way th a t had

n o t b e e n done fo r c e n tu r ie s . I t i s of in te r e s t th a t th is s o r t of an e f fo r t

w as m ad e d u rin g the fo rm a tiv e y e a r s of the A m e ric a n law schoo l, an d

one can sp ecu la te w hat ch an g es m ig h t have tak en p la c e had Y ale b eco m e

the lead in g and m o s t in flu e n tia l of the law sch o o ls . H o w ev er, a s R ee d

in d ic a te d , i t w as no t Y ale b u t H a rv a rd th a t b eg an to s e t the exam ple f o r

o th e r law sch o o ls .

W ithin the c u r r ic u lu m of H a rv a rd L aw S chool, h o w ev e r, a

d ev e lo p m en t took p la c e w hich bo th h ad a p ro found e ffe c t upon le g a l e d u ­

c a tio n an d w as a p o te n tia l co n trib u tio n to the co m m u n ica tio n tra in in g of

the law s tu d en ts . T h is w as the d ev e lo p m en t of the c a s e m ethod of

te ac h in g law . The c a s e m eth o d m u s t be d is c u s s e d in two d im e n s io n s - -

how i t w as in ten d ed to b e , and how i t a c tu a lly w a s .

F i r s t , the c a s e m eth o d w as in ten d ed by i t s d e v e lo p e r - - P ro f e s s o r

C h r is to p h e r L an g d e ll of H a rv a rd - - to be a m eth o d of teach in g law by

dev elo p in g the s tu d en t in le g a l th inking and le g a l re a so n in g , r a th e r th an

^% i d . , pp . 128-225. ® °Reed, lo c . c it .

82

m e re ly teach in g p r in c ip le s of law . T h a t i s to say , m any in the law

fe l t th a t " the p r im a r y o b je c t of le g a l in s tru c t io n is to te a c h the s tu d en t

w hat the law is upon a su ffic ien tly la rg e n u m b e r of to p ic s , to give h im

a g e n e ra l know ledge of a l l i ts m o s t im p o rta n t b ra n c h e s , One of the

fo llo w e rs of L a n g d e ll r e a c te d to th a t p o s itio n , "I should in fe r f ro m jjth a t

s ta te m e n t] th a t the a u th o r 's o b je c t w as know ledge. The o b je c t h e ld up

Û Oby u s a t C am b rid g e i s the pow er of le g a l re a so n in g . . . . A s P r o ­

f e s s o r W illiam A . K e e n e r d e sc r ib e d the s y s te m in 1888,

T h is m e th o d of teach in g does n o t c o n s is t in le c tu re s by the in s t r u c to r w ith r e fe re n c e to the c a s e s in su p p o rt of the p ro p o ­s itio n s s ta te d by h im . The e x e rc is e s in the le c tu re ro o m c o n s is t in a s ta te m e n t and d isc u s s io n by the s tu d en ts of the c a s e s s tu d ied by th e m in advan ce . T h is d isc u ss io n is u n d er the d ire c tio n of the in s t r u c to r , who m a k e s such su g g estio n s and e x p r e s s e s such op in ions a s a r e n e c e s s a ry .

The s tu d en t i s r e q u ire d to an a ly ze each c a s e , d is c r im in a te b e tw een the re le v a n t and i r r e le v a n t , b e tw een the a c tu a l and p o s s ib le g ro u n d s of d e c is io n . And a f te r hav ing thus d is c u s s e d a c a s e , he i s p r e p a re d and r e q u ire d to d e a l w ith i t in i t s re la t io n to o th e r c a s e s .

In o th e r w o rd s th e s tuden t i s p r a c t ic a l ly doing, a s a s tu d en t, w hat he w ill be c o n s ta n tly doing a s a la w y e r . By th is m ethod , the s tu d e n t 's re a so n in g p o w ers a r e c o n s ta n tly developed; and w hile he i s gain ing the pow er of le g a l a n a ly s is and sy n th e s is , he i s a lso gain ing th e o th e r o b jec t of le g a l e d u c a tio n --n a m e ly , a know ledge of w hat th e law a c tu a lly i s . 84

H en ry M. H a r t , J r . and A lb e r t M . S ack s , p ro fe s s o r s of law a t

H a rv a rd , p r e s e n t a m o d e rn in te rp re ta t io n of the L angdell m eth o d in the

® ^W arren , 0£ . c i t . , p . 419. ^^Ibid .

^ % i d . , pp . 419-420 . S ^ Ib id ., p . 421.

83

p re fa c e to th e ir book The L eg a l P r o c e s s ; B a s ic P ro b le m s in the M aking

and A pp lica tion of L aw , 1958.

1. Knowledge abou t law , i t se e m s is e a s ie r to a cq u ire and re ta in , and m o re re a d ily a c c e s s ib le fo r e ffective u s e , ifi t can be re la te d to a c o h e re n t and in te llig ib le v iew of the le g a l sy s te m a s a w hole and i ts c h a r a c te r is t ic m o d es of function ing ,

2. A le g a l sy s te m a sy s te m - a co o rd in a ted , function ing w hole m ade up of a s e t of in te r r e la te d , in te r - a c t in g p a r t s . The so lu tion of sp ec ific leg a l p ro b le m s co n s ta n tly re q u ire s an u n d ers tan d in g of the functions and in te r - r e la t io n s h ip s of m o re th an one in s titu tio n a l p ro c e s s and f re q u e n tly s e v e ra l . P ro b le m s a r is in g in a c o u r t c a ll fo r a p e rc e p tiv e a w a re n e s s not only of w hat c o u rts a r e fo r b u t of w hat a le g is la tu re i s fo r and so m e ­tim e s a lso of w hat an a d m in is tra tiv e agen cy is fo r and of w hat m a t te r s can b e s t b e le f t to p r iv a te d e c is io n . P ro b le m s a r is in g in the c o u rse of the le g is la tiv e o r a d m in is tra tiv e p ro c e s s e s c a ll fo r the sam e a w a re n e s s e s . L a w y e rs a t the stage of p r i ­v a te co u n se lin g have ag ain and ag a in to c o n s id e r w hether to invoke the p ro c e d u re s of p r iv a te o r of ju d ic ia l s e ttle m e n t o r , o ften a lte rn a tiv e ly , of le g is la tiv e o r a d m in is tra tiv e se ttle m e n t.The developm en t of th e se a w a re n e s s e s c a l ls fo r study w hich co m es to g r ip s w ith the q u es tio n s of w hat each of th ese v a r io u s p r o c e s s e s of d ec is io n good fo r and how each in te r - r e la te s and in te ra c ts w ith the o th e rs .

3. M any of the tro u b le so m e an d m o s t freq u en tly r e c u r r in g d iff ic u ltie s in the law a re n o t d iff ic u ltie s of the law of c o n tr a c ts , o r to r t s , o r p ro p e r ty , o r c iv il p ro c e d u re , o r co n s titu tio n a l law , o r of any o th e r of the conven tional f ie ld s of su b stan tiv e o r p ro c e d u ra l law . T hey a re d iff ic u ltie s w hich a r e in tr in s ic in the whole e n te rp r is e of o rg an iz in g and m ain ta in in g a so c ie ty w hich w ill e ffec tiv e ly se rv e the p u rp o se s w hich so c ie tie s e x is t to s e rv e . T hey p ose p ro b le m s and im p lic a te concep ts w hich a p p e a r and r e a p p e a r in e v e ry f ie ld of su b stan tiv e law and in e v e ry p ro c e s s of d ec is io n - ju d ic ia l , le g is la t iv e , a d m in is tra t iv e , and p r iv a te . 85

o eH enry M. H a«t, J r . and A lb e r t M, S acks, The L e g a l P r o c e s s ;

B a s ic P ro b le m s in the M aking and A p p lica tio n of Law (C am bridge: T e n ta tiv e E d itio n , 1958), pp. i i i - iv .

84

T h e se a u th o rs , sh o rtly fo llow ing the p re c e d in g s ta te m e n t, say e x p lic itly

th a t th is p ro p o se s noth ing m o re than the c a s e sy s tem of L an g d e ll of the

1870’ s.®^

The second o b lig a tio n involved in an ex am in a tio n of the c a se

m eth o d of teach in g a s i t developed b e fo re th e 20th C en tu ry is an acco u n t

of w hat i t a c tu a lly b e c a m e , H arno d e s c r ib e s th e se two fe a tu re s of the

c a se m ethod a s p a ra d o x ic a l. "L an g d e ll, " sa y s H arno , " in tro d u ce d and

h is e a r ly d is c ip le s p e r fe c te d , a sy s te m of in s tru c t io n w hich in the h an d s

of an ab le and sk illfu l te a c h e r is u n e x ce lled a s an in s tru m e n t of ed u ­

c a tio n . " H ow ever, H arn o p ro c e e d s to say th a t ", , , L an g d e ll a lso

i s re sp o n s ib le m o re th an any o th e r m an fo r confining le g a l ed u ca tio n in

a s tra ig h t m o ld w hich w as fo r y e a r s to d is s o c ia te i t f ro m the liv in g

co n tex t of the w o rld ab o u t i t , " Going on , H arn o sa y s .

The d ic tu m w as th a t a l l the a v a ila b le m a te r ia ls of the law w e re con ta in ed in p r in te d b o oks, and th e p r in te d books f ro m w hich and only f ro m w hich a le g a l ed u ca tio n w as to be had w e re c a se -b o o k s c o n s is tin g of s e le c te d d e c is io n s of the a p p e l­la te c o u r ts on each of the m a in to p ic s of the law . D is re g a rd e d w e re the b ro a d p r e m is e s fo r the study of law conceived by th o se m en who h e ld the in it ia l p ro fe s s o r s h ip s of law . U n reco g ­n ized w as the fa c t th a t p ro sp e c tiv e la w y e rs needed tra in in g in v a r io u s a r e a s of le a rn in g and sk ill,

H arn o n o tes th a t i t c am e to be the no tion th a t the law w as s e lf - su f f ic ie n t

and th a t re ach in g le g a l co n c lu s io n s in v o lv ed nothing m o re than r e c o u rs e

® ^Ibid ,, p , V, ®^Harno, og. c i t , , pp , 59-60 ,

85

to the law i ts e l f and i t s own in te rn a l h is to r y . T h is w as so no t only in

the U nited S ta te s b u t in E n g lan d and E u ro p e a s w e ll.

In conclud ing the co m m en ts on the c a s e m eth o d of in s tru c tio n in

law sc h o o ls , i t can be sa id th a t i t s co n cep tio n invo lved g re a t p o te n tia l

in the d ev e lo p m en t of r h e to r ic a l th eo ry in th e ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s . H ad

the c a s e m eth o d developed a s o r ig in a lly p lan n ed , i t w ould have b ro u g h t

ab o u t e x te n s iv e a n a ly s is of the r h e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of ju r is p ru d e n c e ,

a long w ith the study of le g a l p r in c ip le s . I t could be re a so n e d th a t f ro m

such a study of p r a c t ic e m ig h t have com e d is c u s s io n s of the th e o ry of

law . T h is s ta te m e n t i s a c a d e m ic , h o w e v e r , in lig h t of the d ire c tio n

tak en in th e d ev e lo p m en t of the ca se m e th o d . The c o n ce rn fo r le g a l

p r in c ip le s to the ex c lu s io n of a l l e lse le f t no tim e fo r rh e to r ic a l a n a ly s is .

The above le a d s d ire c tly to a d is c u s s io n of the d iv e rg e n t p h ilo ­

so p h ies of law sch o o ls w ith r e g a rd to p r a c t ic a l a s p e c ts of th e ir p ro g ra m .

W hile th is d iffe re n c e of ph ilosophy h a s a l r e a d y b een su g g ested and

d e s c r ib e d b r ie f ly , a few m o re co m m en ts a r e n e c e s s a ry to g ive a c le a r

p ic tu re . A t the School of L aw a t C o lu m b ia , fo r ex a m p le . D ean H a rla n

F is k Stone s ta te d the ph ilo sophy of h is sch o o l w hen he sa id th a t p r e ­

p a ra t io n fo r the b a r (w hich he re c o g n iz e d a s the p u rp o se of law schoo ls)

invo lved two p r o c e s s e s . " T h e re is f i r s t , " s a id S tone, " the m a s te r y of

88lbid.

86

the p r in c ip le s of the com m on law and equ ity s y s te m s , w hich can be

a cq u ire d only by d ilig en t study, p re fe ra b ly u n d e r co m p éten t g u id an ce ,

of p r in te d b o o k s , p r in c ip a lly th e r e p o r ts of ju d ic ia l d e c is io n s . . . .

The second p r o c e s s w as the p r a c t ic a l e x p e rien ce ". . . by w hich the

s tuden t b e c o m e s f a m il ia r w ith the c o u rse of p ro c e d u re in the law office

and in the c o u r ts and public o ffices ; the m a c h in e ry , in s h o r t , by w hich

the law y er a p p lie s th o se p r in c ip le s to c a s e s ac tu a lly a r is in g in h is

p ro fe s s io n a l p r a c t ic e . "^0 T h is , of c o u rse , would include any a tte m p t

to p re p a re a la w y e r fo r the co m m u n ica tiv e a sp e c ts of law p ra c t ic e .

"L ike W arden D w ight b e fo re h im . D ean Stone fe lt v e ry s tro n g ly th a t i t

w as to the f i r s t of th e se two p h a s e s of le g a l tra in in g th a t the law schoo ls

ought to devo te th e ir a tten tio n . . . . " Stone fe l t th a t any p r a c t ic a l

tra in in g w as n o t p a r t of the b u s in e s s of the law school. He f e l t th a t the

m ech an ic s of p r a c t ic e , a s he c a lle d th e m , could be p ick ed up a f te r

g rad u a tio n . 91

R e tu rn in g to the s ta r t of the S to ry e r a a t H a rv a rd , H arn o r e c a l ls

the in c o n s is te n c y be tw een the id e a l the D ean s e t fo rth in h is in a u g u ra l- -

the d e s ire to b ro a d e n leg a l study to include o th e r a re a s such a s

rh e to r ic - - a n d th e a c tu a lity of the c u r r ic u lu m un d er h is d ire c tio n . "T h is

r a i s e s the o f t - r e c u r r in g q u es tio n , " say s H arn o , "a s to w hat should be

®9ooebel, o£. c i t . , p. 226. 90ibid. ^^Ibid.

87

tau g h t in a law school and w hat should be a ssu m e d to h ave b een taugh t

ad eq u a te ly by o th e r ed u ca tio n a l a g e n c ie s . " H arno r e c a l l s th a t a t th a t

t im e H a rv a rd d id not even re q u ire i ts law s tu d en ts to h ave su ffic ien t

p r e l im in a ry ed u ca tio n a s th a t r e q u ire d fo r a d m iss io n to co lleg e .

How th en could S to ry say th a t th ey Q aw s tu d e n ts ] had had su ff ic ie n t in s tru c tio n in the f ie ld s u n d er d is c u s s io n ? W hat se e m s to be c le a r i s th a t u n d er S to ry , w h e th e r he so v iew ed i t o r n o t, a m o m en to u s step in the developm en t of le g a l ed ucation w as tak en . L e a d e rs b e fo re h im , inc lud ing B la c k - s to n e , J e f fe rs o n , K en t, and H offm an, had conceived of the study of law a s a p a r t of a l ib e ra l education . U nder S tory l ib e ra l and le g a l in s tru c tio n w e re d iv o rc ed , and a s to l ib e ra l education a l l th a t re m a in e d w as the a ssu m p tio n th a t s tu d en ts h a d som ehow gotten i t e lse w h e re .

H arno s tre n g th e n s h is com m en ts by s ta tin g th a t "w hen le g a l

ed ucation in A m e ric a g ra v ita te d to the u n iv e r s i t ie s , the c r i t ic is m of the

lim ite d co n ten t of the c o u rse of in s tru c tio n w as s t i l l v a lid . " He a g re e s

th a t the law sch o o ls o ffe re d a b e t te r ed ucation than d id o ffice study,

b u t, he n o te s , " . . . beyond th a t th ey [ law s c h o o ls ] m e re ly s u b s ti­

tu ted one te c h n ic a l p ro g ra m fo r a n o th e r . " The c a se s y s te m , says

H arn o , w o rk ed no su b s ta n tia l change. "In som e r e s p e c ts c a se in s t r u c ­

tio n confined le g a l ed u ca tio n into an even n a r ro w e r m o ld . "^3 Included

in th is n a r ro w n e s s , a c c o rd in g to H arn o , is the re fu s a l of the co lleg es

of law to sp ec ify the c o n ten t of p re le g a l education .

The q u es tio n re m a in s a s to how th is d iffe re n c e of ph ilosophy in

the few sch o o ls sp e c if ic a lly m en tio n ed thus f a r in flu en ced the g e n e ra l

^^H arn o , og. c i t . , p . 48. p. 9 1 ,

88

p a th of le g a l ed u ca tio n in the U nited S ta te s . A lf re d Z. R eed , in h is

study of A m e ric a n L e g a l E d u ca tio n , d raw s th is co n clu sio n .

The two New E n g lan d sch o o ls [ H a rv a rd and Y ale ] w ere a lik e in seek ing to t r a in only the p ra c tic in g la w y e r , and not the p o lit ic ia n o r le g is la to r a s w e ll. W here th ey d iffe red w as in th e ir e s tim a te of the k ind of tra in in g th a t th e p ra c t i t io n e r re q u ire d . H a rv a rd w as slow to a ssu m e e n t i r e re sp o n s ib ili ty fo r th is ta s k , a s a su b sd tu te fo r the sy s te m of office tra in in g .I ts o r ig in a l co n cep tion of i t s m is s io n w as to leav e to the o ffice w hat the schoo l can n o t do so w e ll. Y ale , on the o th e r hand , f ro m the s t a r t f ra n k ly a tte m p te d n e ith e r m o r e n o r l e s s than an o rd in a ry p r a c t i t io n e r s ' c o u r s e , annexing to i t s e l f w hat w as e s s e n tia l ly a s y s te m a tiz e law o ffice . T r a c e s of th is e a r ly co n flic t of id e a ls m ay a t a l l p e r io d s of o u r h is to ry be found b e tw een schoo l and schoo l, o r in the sam e schoo l a t d iffe re n t p e r io d s ; now a som ew hat g r e a te r e m p h a s is upon a sc h o la rly t re a tm e n t of the b ro a d e r a s p e c ts of the com m on law ; now a g r e a te r a tte n tio n to the m in u tiae of p r a c t ic e , to the d ra ftin g of w r i tte n in s tru m e n ts , to the p u re ly lo c a l law of the j u r i s ­d ic tio n . E a r ly law sch o o ls , h o w ev er, c an n o t be s a tis fa c to r i ly c la s s if ie d f ro m th is p o in t of v iew . A s the p r e s s u r e to se c u re s tu d e n ts , and th e re fo re to give s tu d en ts w h at they dem and, h a s m ade i t s e l f f e l t u n d er a co m p etitiv e r e g im e , few schoo ls have p u rsu e d a c o n s is te n t p o licy in th is r e s p e c t . The v a r ia t io n s sp rin g p a r t ly f ro m the c a lib re o r te m p e ra m e n t of the in s t r u c ­to r s - - th e re la t iv e im p o rta n c e th ey a tta c h to th o ro u g h grounding in fu n d am en ta l p r in c ip le s , a s a g a in s t an ed u ca tio n th a t w ill be of im m ed ia te u s e - - a n d p a r t ly f ro m the n a tu re of the c lie n te le to w hich the schoo l m u s t n a tu ra lly a p p e a l- -w h e th e r to a n a tio n a l o r to a lo c a l s tu d en t body. The m a in s ig n ifican ce of the sh ifting p o licy and g e n e ra l u n c e r ta in ty a s to p re c is e ly w hat su b je c ts sh a ll b e tau g h t i s the ev idence w hich th is a ffo rd s th a t the com m unity d em an d s m o re than a s in g le type of leg a l edu ca tio n . In th e a tte m p t to be a l l th in g s to a l l m en , a s ta n ­d a rd iz e d c u r r ic u lu m h a s b een sought. F a i lu re a f te r a l l th e se y e a r s to a g re e a s to the co n ten t of such a c u r r ic u lu m is a p r e t ty f a i r in d ic a tio n th a t the ta s k is im p o ss ib le . 94

^^R eed , 0£ . c i t . , p . 156.

89

A s w ill be d is c o v e re d la te r in th is study , th is d iffe re n c e h a s n o t b een

re s o lv e d to the p r e s e n t day.

The o b jec tiv e in th is c h a p te r h a s b een to study the dev elo p m en t

of A m e ric a n le g a l edu ca tio n . T he m o v em en t f ro m the a p p re n tic e sh ip

p h ilo so p h y of th e B r i t is h to the fo rm a l p ro fe s s io n a l school in th e U nited

S ta te s h a s b een t r a c e d . In the c o u rse of th is e x a m in a tio n , som e o b s e r ­

v a tio n s have b ee n m ad e w hich w ill h e lp the in v e s tig a tio n y e t to com e.

F o r ex am p le , the change f ro m a p p re n tic e sh ip to law school

ed u ca tio n n e c e s s i ta te d a re -e x a m in a tio n of the p h ilo so p h y of le g a l p r a c ­

t ic e . W h ereas the p re v io u s a ssu m p tio n h ad b e e n th a t the le a rn in g of the

fu n c tio n s of le g a l p ra c t ic e w as of p r im a r y im p o r ta n c e , and a know ledge

of p r in c ip le s of law w ould fo llow in tim e ; in the law sch o o ls the r e v e r s e

w as h e ld . T h a t i s , the law sch o o ls tau g h t p r in c ip le s an d le f t know ledge

of fun c tio n s to gmow in la te r t im e d u rin g p r a c t ic e . A lthough co n flic t

e x is te d am ong the law sch o o ls w ith r e g a rd to th is p h ilo so p h y , n e v e r th e ­

le s s th ro u g h the in flu en ce la rg e ly of H a rv a rd L aw School, the p a t te rn

w as s e t fo r m o s t of the co u n try .

F in a lly , the ex ten s iv e in flu en c e of the law sch o o ls on the d ev e lo p ­

m e n t of le g a l p r a c t ic e h a s b een o b s e rv e d . T h ro u g h the pow er tak en f ro m

the h an d s of the p r a c t i t io n e r s , law sch o o ls beg an to a s s e r t th e ir th e o r ie s

upon the p ro fe s s io n and the ju d ic ia l sy s te m a s a w hole . To the ex ten t th a t

the law sch o o ls su b o rd in a ted an in t e r e s t in the r h e to r ic of law , to th a t

e x te n t i t w as su b o rd in a ted th ro u g h o u t the p ro fe s s io n .

C H A PTER m

CH ARACTER O F RH ETO RICAL THEORY IN

MODERN LEG A L EDUCATION

The im p a c t of the law schoo l on le g a l p ra c t ic e in the U nited

S ta te s can n o t b e e x a g g e ra te d . C h ap te r II show s th is . The th e o re t ic a l

v iew s h e ld by the ed n ca tb n s a r e re f le c te d , th ro u g h th e ir s tu d e n ts , in

the law o ffic e s and c o u r ts of the c o u n try . In a study of the c h a ra c te r

of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in le g a l p r a c t ic e , th e r e fo re , i t is re a so n a b le to

look to th e law sch o o ls to see w hat th e o re t ic a l v iew s they ho ld on the

su b je c t.

In th is c h a p te r , the m o d e rn p e r io d w ill be tak en to in c lu d e the

p r e s e n t c e n tu ry . A s w ill be d is c o v e re d , f ro m 1900 to th e p r e s e n t the

g r e a te s t g row th and in tro sp e c tio n h a s o c c u r re d am ong th e law sch o o ls ,

and th is p e r io d is th u s the m o s t f ru i tfu l so u rc e of in fo rm a tio n fo r th is

study .

W ith r e g a rd to the d isc o v e ry of e d u c a to r s ’ a tti tu d e s to w ard

rh e to r ic a l th e o ry , and the e ffe c ts of th e se a ttitu d e s in the law c u r r ic u la ,

i t i s u se fu l to d iv ide th e in v e s tig a tio n in to fo u r su b d iv is io n s . F i r s t ,

the im p lic a tio n s of the co n flic t b e tw een law office and law schoo l education

90

91

w ill be d isc u s se d ; second , the p ro p e r fu n c tio n s of a law s c h o o l- -p a r t ic u ­

la r ly w ith r e g a rd to rh e to r ic a l th e o ry - -w il l be exam ined; th i rd , the law

schoo l c u r r ic u la w ill b e s e a rc h e d fo r ev idence of r h e to r ic a l th eo ry ; and

fo u rth , r h e to r ic a l th e o r ie s w ill b e t r a c e d th rough p re - la w re q u ire m e n ts

s e t up by le g a l e d u c a to rs .

Law O ffice v s . L aw School

The a c tu a l co n flic t b e tw een a p p re n tic e sh ip in a law o ffice and

fo rm a l study in a law school i s n o t so im p o rta n t to th is s tudy a s i s the

im p lica tio n of th is co n flic t upon the th e o re t ic a l foundation of le g a l edu ­

ca tio n . C le a r ly , the w ork of an a p p re n tic e in the office of a p ra c t ic in g

a tto rn e y w as of a p r a c t ic a l s o r t . He w as ex p ec ted to le a r n the p ra c t ic e

of law a s any a p p re n tic e le a rn e d any t r a d e . "T he p ra c t ic e of law in

e a r ly t im e s w as the p ra c tic e r a th e r of a tra d e than of an a p p lie d sc ie n ce ;

and a d m iss io n to i t , a s to o th e r t r a d e s , w as th ro u g h a p p re n tic e sh ip .

So sa id Jo sep h H en ry B e a le , R o y all P r o fe s s o r of Law a t H a rv a rd in

1937 . He w en t on to say , "T h is v iew of law p re v a ile d in th is co u n try fo r

a h u n d red y e a r s o r m o re , and the young m an le a rn e d law only by going

abou t w ith a la w y e r , o b se rv in g w hat he d id and th en doing lik e w ise .

W hile P r o f e s s o r B ea le w as a b i t p re m a tu re in suggesting th a t th is fo rm

^Joseph H en ry B ea le , "T he H is to ry of L e g a l E d u ca tio n , " in Law A C en tu ry of P r o g r e s s 1835-1935, I (New Y ork: New Y o rk U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1937) , p . 104.

^Ibid .

92

of ed u ca tio n h ad ended a f te r a hundred y e a r s o r m o re in the U nited S ta tes

(in 1964 th e re re m a in som e s ta te s in w hich a p e r io d of study in a law

office i s s a tis fa c to ry q u a lifica tio n to app ly fo r a d m iss io n to th e b a r ) , h is

d e s c r ip tio n of th is type of tra in in g i s u se fu l, and i ts s tre n g th s and w eak ­

n e s s e s b eco m e a p p a re n t. When such an a p p re n tic e g rad u a ted in to h is

own p r a c t ic e , he p ro b ab ly had only the b a r e s t a p p re c ia tio n of the p r in c i ­

p le s and ph ilosophy of the law , b u t he h ad a f a i r ly c le a r id ea of w hat a

law y er w as ex p ec ted to do w ith a c lie n t. He h ad w atched a law y er ta lk

w ith a c lien t; he had p o ss ib ly ta lk ed w ith th em h im se lf . He h ad seen

the le g a l fo rm s p re p a re d and p re p a re d som e h im se lf; he had w a tch ed a

t r i a l and h ad p ick ed up som e id eas on the w ays of an e ffec tiv e t r i a l

la w y e r .

O rig in a lly , p r o fe s s o r s of law in the co lleg es a im e d only a t p r o ­

v id ing a co m p lem en t to the study in an o f f ic e - - th e y w ish ed to f i l l the

e x is tin g gap in the law s tu d e n t’s a p p re c ia tio n of the p r in c ip le s and

ph ilosophy of the law . T h is w as tru e of the f i r s t law school in L itc h fie ld ,

C o n n ec ticu t, w hich w as nothing m o re th an an o rg a n iz e d law office

d ê sig n ed to p ro v id e a m o re sy s te m a tic ed u ca tio n in the p r in c ip le s of the

law . T h ese p o in ts w e re b ro u g h t out in the p rec ed in g c h a p te r .

H ow ever, a s le g a l education e n te re d the 20th C en tu ry , the law

school cam e m o re and m o re to be v iew ed a s a s e lf -su ff ic ie n t in s tru m e n t

93

of tra in in g fo r law s tu d e n ts . In A u g u st of 1900 the A sso c ia tio n of A m e r ­

ic a n Law Schools w as fo rm e d a s a r e s u l t of the in itia tiv e of som e

m e m b e rs of the A m e r ic a n B a r A sso c ia tio n , ^ By the tim e of the seco n d

m ee tin g of the a s s o c ia t io n , the p r e s id e n t , E m lin M cC la in , sa id th is in

h is m a jo r a d d r e s s ;

I th ink we can a g re e th a t the s tu d en t who p u r s u e s h is c o u rse in an office o r by p r iv a te re a d in g does so to h is d isad v a n ta g e , and th a t w h a te v e r m ay be h is in d iv id u a l s u c c e s s in the p r o f e s ­sion , h is law tra in in g a c q u ire d in th e se m e th o d s is le s s th o ro u g h and le s s e f f ic ie n t a s to the m a n h im se lf th an the re g u la r w o rk of a law sch o o l. ^

In 1913 , the E x e cu tiv e C o m m ittee of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw

Schools r e p o r te d , " . . . we b e lie v e th a t a l l s tu d en ts should have th re e

y e a r s in a law sch o o l of re c o g n iz e d s tand ing . . . . " T hen , they w en t

on to say , in re s p o n s e to a re so lu tio n by W illiam R o g e rs of the U n iv e r ­

s ity of C in c in n a ti, "W e b e lie v e th a t th a t p a r t of th e re so lu tio n w hich

re c o m m e n d s a y e a r of a p p re n tic e sh ip in a law office i s unw ise , in v iew

of ex is tin g co n d itio n s in law o ff ic e s .

^ A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, H andbook, V ol. 1,1900- 1901.

^ E m lin M cC la in , "A d d re ss of the P r e s id e n t ," P ro c e e d in g s of th e Second A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S ch o o ls , V ol. 2, i 9 0 4 p . 38.

^ R ep o rt of th e E x ecu tiv e C o m m ittee , P ro c e e d in g s of the T h i r ­te e n th A nnual M eetin g of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls,V ol. 13 (1913), p . 17.

94

R ee d , in h is 1928 study of law sch o o ls no ted th a t once a p r e s ­

c r ib e d p e r io d of p re p a ra t io n fo r p ra c t ic e h a s b een s e t, " , . . the q u es tio n

of the e x te n t to w hich law schoo l study m ay o r should re p la c e du ring th is

p e r io d th e tra d it io n a l m e th o d of p re p a ra t io n in an a t to rn e y 's office h a s

cau sed th e g r e a te s t p e rp le x ity , I t is co n ce iv ab le , say s R ee d , th a t

law s tudy cou ld have b een r e s t r i c t e d to a r ig o ro u s ly c o n tro lle d a p p re n ­

tic e sh ip p ro g ra m leav in g l i t t l e o r no ro o m fo r a law schoo l ex cep t a s i t

m igh t b e u s e d c o n c u rre n tly w ith o ffice w o rk . T h is i s e s s e n tia l ly how

the s itu a tio n developed in C anada and the U nited K ingdom , In fa c t, say s

R eed , "In c e r ta in of the m id d le A tlan tic s ta te s the d ev e lo p m en t of law

schoo ls w a s , , , r e ta rd e d by i l l ib e r a l b a r a d m iss io n ru le s , " T h is w as

p re v e n te d f ro m becom ing a g e n e ra l p r a c t ic e in the U nited S ta te s by a

lax ity of th e ru le s and a f a i lu r e , g e n e ra lly , "to copy the E n g lish s ta tu ­

to ry p ro v is io n th a t r e s t r i c t e d the n u m b er of c le rk s who m ig h t be tak en

in to one o f f ic e ," "In the ab sen c e of th is r e s t r i c t io n ," say s R eed , "law

sch o o ls d ev e lo p ed out of law o ffices in a p e r fe c tly n a tu ra l w ay . T h u s,

i t w as d if f ic u lt to r e s i s t th e i r c la im to a re c o g n iz e d p la c e in the b a r

a d m iss io n sy s te m , "7

^ A lfred Z a n tz in g e r R eed , P re s e n t-D a y Law S chools in the U nited S ta tes a n d C anada, B u ll, N o, 21 (New Y ork: C arn eg ie F oundation fo r the A d v an cem en t of T each in g , 1928), p , 55,

’ Ibid,

95

A t f i r s t , the law sch o o ls d id not ex p ec t to p ro v id e the e n t ire

ed u ca tio n of the law s tu d en t. A t H a rv a rd , w hich w as the f i r s t law school

to o p e ra te in a s ta te w hich p re s c r ib e d a p e r io d of p re p a ra tio n fo r the

b a r , i t w as only a sk e d th a t the studen ts who ch o se to a tten d the c o u rs e s

be p e rm it te d to coun t the tim e th u s spen t a g a in s t the to ta l am o u n t

p r e s c r ib e d . A t th a t t im e , the com plete law c o u rs e a t H a rv a rd occup ied

only h a lf of the to ta l am o u n t p re s c r ib e d . T h u s , a s tu d en t w ould spend a

y e a r and a h a lf a t schoo l and the sam e am o u n t of tim e in an o ffice , ®

T h is a s s u re d th a t th e s tu d en t w ould re c e iv e som e p ra c t ic a l tra in in g ,

"W hen, h o w ev er, the sch o o ls bo th leng thened and in te n s if ie d th e i r

c o u rs e s of in s tru c tio n , " o b s e rv e s R eed , "w hile a t the sam e tim e the

p e r io d of p re p a ra t io n , if p r e s c r ib e d a t a l l , w as g re a tly red u ced , i t w as

fo re s e e n th a t the ou tcom e m ig h t be th a t the a p p lic a n t would re c e iv e no

office tra in in g a t a l l ,

To avoid th is p o s s ib il i ty , som e p ra c t ic in g a tto rn e y s a tte m p te d to

have law s adop ted to in s i s t th a t som e of the p r e p a ra t io n tim e be sp en t

in an o ffice . By 1928, a c co rd in g to the R eed r e p o r t , only Rhode Is lan d ,

New J e r s e y , V e rm o n t, and New Y ork a c c e p te d th is condition . R eed

continue s.

In a l l the re m a in in g fo rty -f iv e ju r is d ic t io n s , the law sch o o ls have won th e ir f ig h t to be p e rm itte d to occupy if they can ,

® Ibid., p . 55 ^Ibid,

96

a g a in s t the f r e e co m p e titio n of law o ffice s , the e n t ire f ie ld of p ro fe s s io n a l p re p a ra t io n . In ten s ta te s they even occupy a p r iv ile g e d p o s itio n in th is r e s p e c t . The p r e s c r ib e d p e r io d fo r o ffice s tu d en ts in I ll in o is , M ich igan , M in n eso ta , O hio, W ashington (s ta te ) , and W isco n sin i s fo u r y e a r s a s a g a in s t the th re e y e a r s th a t su ffice a t le a s t fo r c e r ta in ty p es of law sch o o ls s tu d en ts ; and v e ry re c e n tly [1 9 2 8 ] W est V irg in ia h a s announced th a t i t w ill g ive no c re d i t fo r o ffice s tudy , and K entucky , C o lo rad o , and W yom ing have d e c re e d th a t a t le a s t one of th e i r two o r th re e p r e s c r ib e d y e a r s m u s t be sp en t in a law schoo l.

The p ro b le m of r e la t io n s b e tw een the law sch o o ls and law office

s tudy i s s ta te d s im p ly - - s in ce the law sch o o ls w e re be ing r e s t r i c t e d by

the p ra c tic in g a t to rn e y s , they fe l t a n eed to em p h a s iz e th e ir s tre n g th s

and avo id th e ir w e a k n e s se s . They c o n c e n tra te d on the aca d em ic and

o v erlo o k ed th e p r a c t ic a l . A s R eed o b se rv e d .

U n w illin g n ess on the p a r t of the p ro fe s s io n a t la rg e to concede th a t law school tra in in g is in d isp e n sab le h a s p ro m o te d u n w ill­in g n e ss on the p a r t of law schoo l m en to concede th a t any o th e r s o r t of tra in in g is d e s ir a b le , and h a s fo s te re d a sy s te m of p r e p a ra t io n in w hich n e ith e r of th e se two m e th o d s re c e iv e s i t s a p p ro p r ia te e m p h a s is ,

The law schoo l m en a lso c o n s is te n tly b e lie v e d th a t law office

tra in in g w as in e ff ic ie n t, and p o o rly m an ag ed . The g e n e ra l fee lin g in

the law sch o o ls , then , w as th a t the s tu d en t could ob ta in a ll of the tru ly

v ita l edu ca tio n in the sch o o l, and any th ing e lse he n eed ed could be p ick ed

up e a r ly in h is c a r e e r . A fte r a l l , th ey sa id , the la w y e r , un like the

p h y s ic ia n , r a r e ly k i l ls h is c l ie n ts ,

lO lb id ,, p , 56, l l l b i d , , p . 213,

97

The P ro p e r F u n c tio n of the Law School

The in e sc a p a b le co n c lu s io n of the p re c e d in g sec tio n i s tlia t law

sch o o ls m o v ed f ro m a c le a r ly defined function of p ro v id in g th e p r in c ip le s

of law to a vague function of p re p a r in g s tu d en ts fo r the p ra c t ic e of law .

T h is co n c lu s io n im p lie s th a t th e r e w as no c a re fu l thought g iven to the

q u es tio n of w hat c o n s titu te s ad eq u a te p re p a ra t io n fo r p ra c t ic e - - r a th e r

the sc h o o ls , la rg e ly in s e lf -d e fe n se ag a in s t the p ra c tic in g la w y e rs ,

cam e to define the p ro v is io n of p r in c ip le s of law a s th e to ta l fu n c tio n of

p re p a r in g s tu d en ts fo r p ra c tic in g law . T h a t they d id no t convince the

p ra c tic in g la w y e rs of th is i s c le a r f ro m the fa c ts show ing the re fu s a l

of the s ta te s im m e d ia te ly to g ive the law schoo ls so le ju r is d ic t io n in

the p re p a ra t io n of la w y e rs . T h is i s shown in the f i r s t sec tio n of th is

c h a p te r .

T h a t the law school r e p re s e n ta t iv e s th e m se lv e s w e re no t u n a n i­

m o u sly co n v in ced of th is c o n c lu s io n w ill b eco m e c le a r in the m a te r ia l to

fo llow . To p u t th e q u estio n in the p e rsp e c tiv e of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry , i t

could b e sa id th a t the law sch o o ls had fo rc e d th e m s e lv e s , in m any c a s e s ,

to b e lie v e th a t education in Inven tio w as su ffic ien t to p r e p a re the fo re n s ic

s p e a k e r o r w r i te r ; and th a t any n eed he m ig h t have fb r the rem a in in g

tra d it io n a l p a r t s of rh e to r ic - - D ispo s itio , E lo c u tio , P ronvu itia tio , and

M e m o r ia - -w ould be s a tis f ie d th ro u g h ac tu a l p r a c t ic e . Some

98

re p re s e n ta t iv e s of the law sch o o ls r e je c te d tills co n c lu s io n . They co n ­

ten d ed th a t know ledge of the p r in c ip le s of the law an d know ledge of how

to find the n e c e s s a ry id e a s in any c a se (th is inc lud ing the lo g ica l p ro o fs )

w as no t enough. T hey a rg u e d th a t such tra in in g w ould leav e the s tu d en t

in ad eq u a te ly p re p a re d to a r ra n g e and p r e s e n t h is id e a s e ith e r to a c lie n t,

a n o th e r a tto rn e y , o r to a c o u r t . T h is i s the e s se n c e of the co n flic t

o v e r the p ro p e r fu n ctio n of the law school.

The annual m e e tin g of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law Schools

p ro v id e d a fo ru m fo r the exchange of id e a s on th is c o n tro v e rsy . In 1910,

John C, T ow nes, speak ing on the "O rg an iza tio n an d O p era tio n of a L aw

School, " c le a r ly in d ic a te d h is p o s itio n in the d eb a te , "A nother m o s t

im p o rta n t p a r t of the w o rk of the law schoo l, " Tow nes sa id , " is teach in g

p ro c e d u re , I su b m it th a t th is i s r e a l ly the tru e c a s e sy s te m , "If

the p u rp o se and u n d e rly in g id e a of th a t sy s tem i s to th ro w the s tu d en t

b a c k upon h im se lf and h is own r e s o u rc e s and t r a in h im in doing ex a c tly

w hat he w ill have to do a f te r h e le a v e s the schoo l, the p re p a ra tio n and

t r i a l of c a s e s m e e ts th is dem and a s no o th e r p a r t of the c u rr ic u lu m

p o ss ib ly can , B eing sp e c if ic , Tow nes a rg u e d th a t in the p ra c t ic e

c o u r t w o rk the s tu d en t is ob liged to an a ly ze fa c ts an d find the com b in atio n

IZ jo h n C, T ow nes, "O rg an iza tio n and O p era tio n of a Law School, " P ro c e e d in g s of the T en th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S ch o o ls, V ol. 10 (1910), p , 74,

1 3 ib id ,, pp , 74-75 ,

99

of c irc u m s ta n c e s th a t show a le g a l r ig h t, a v io la tio n of the r ig h t, and

co n seq u en t dam age. If the s tu d en t i s to do th is , the sp e a k e r c la im e d ,

he m u s t app ly ru le s of law to f a c ts , find the a u th o r it ie s , and m ake h is

own ju d g m en ts ah to th e ir re la t iv e im p o rta n c e . A fte r th is , the s tuden t

m u s t p r e p a re h is own p lead in g so a s to m ake c le a r the i s s u e s , and

fin a lly , h e m u s t m ake good h is a rg u m e n ts in the t r i a l . "If th e re i s any

fo rce in th e a rg u m en t, " d e c la re d T ow nes, " th a t the s tu d en t m u s t be

t ra in e d in the law school to do th a t w hich he i s a f te rw a rd to do in the

law o ffice , i t finds p e c u lia r ap p lic a tio n and fo rc e in the teach in g of

p r o c e d u r e ."14

A fte r m aking h is a rg u m e n t in fav o r of a m o re com plete th eo ry

of the fo re n s ic rh e to r ic , T ow nes p ro c e e d s to a t ta c k h is o p p o n en ts’ id e a s .

H is a rg u m e n t sa id s im p ly th a t the study of c a s e s a lre a d y d e c id e d - -a s in

the c a se m e th o d --g a v e the s tu d en t p r e p a ra t io n in one of the p r o c e s s e s he

needed a s a law y er. A n im p o rta n t p ro c e s s i s thus p ro v id e d , Tow nes

g ran te d , b u t only one of m an y . "T he p re p a ra t io n and t r i a l of c a s e s in a

m oot c o u r t , o r by w h a tev er n am e the tr ib u n a l m ay be c a lle d , n e c e s s a r i ly

invo lves th em a l l , " "Y et s tra n g e to s a y ," T ow nes concluded , " a s a

ru le the sch o o ls w hich in s i s t m o s t s tre n u o u s ly on the ca se sy s te m give

le a s t a tte n tio n to the a d je c tiv e law and the t r i a l of c a s e s . I f e a r th e re

1 4 lb id ., p. 75.

100

m u s t be som eth ing w rong w ith m y lo g ic . T h is iro n ic conclusion w as

c le a r ly a im e d a t the ph ilo sophy of the H a rv a rd L aw School, w hich saw

the o rig in a tio n of the c a se m e th o d and w hich le d th o se who opposed the

p r a c t ic a l law c u rr ic u lu m .

In the g e n e ra l d is c u s s io n of the A ddress by P r o f e s s o r T ow nes”,

O liv e r A . M ark e r, th en D ean of the U n iv e rs ity of I llin o is College of L aw

cam e to h is su p p o rt w ith th is com m ent: 'G en tlem en who a r e so f re e to

d e c la re th a t the a tte m p t to te a c h p ra c t ic e and p lead in g in the A m e ric a n

law school h a s b een a fa i lu re h av e had a d if fe re n t e x p e rie n c e fro m som e

of u s . " D ean M ark er m en tio n ed s u c c e s s fu l lp ra c t ic a l c u r r ic u la both a t

the U n iv e rs ity of M ichigan and the U n iv e rs ity of I ll in o is .

T hese w ere only the opening argum ents in a debate destined to

em erge annually for m any m ore y e a r s . In 1911, Marian F isk Stone,

speaking a s the P resid en t of the A sso cia tio n , a d d ressed h im self to the

question of the function of the law school. In answ ering that question,

he sa id , ”, . . it should be borne in m ind that the en tire h istory of leg a l

education teach es us that the law school i s p ecu lia r ly the p lace for the

student to becom e the m a ster of the p rin cip les of law from the sch olarly

IS lb id .

^ '^Oliver A . M a rk e r , "D isc u ss io n , ” P ro c e e d in g s of the T en th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S chools, Vol. 10,(1910), p . 10.

101

and th e o re t ic a l p o in t of v iew . "1? It w as th is , he c la im e d , th a t h ad p e r ­

m it te d the law schoo l to su cceed in co m p e titio n w ith th e law o ffice a s

an in s tru m e n t of le g a l edu ca tio n .

Two a s p e c ts of the p r a c t ic a l c u r r ic u lu m m e t p a r t ic u la r ly w ith

S to n e’ s d isa p p ro v a l: le g a l a id " d is p e n s a ry s " a s he c a lle d th e m , and

m o o t c o u r t p ro g ra m s . " It m ay be q u e s tio n ed , " he sa id , "w h e th e r th e se

e x p e r im e n ts , ju d g ed fro m the v iew po in t of the p r o p e r fu n c tio n of the

law sch o o l, w ill p ro v e to b e p ro f ita b le . H is a rg u m e n t w as th a t the

th re e y e a r s a llow ed fo r the law school p ro g ra m w e re so s h o r t th a t only

th o se s tu d ie s w hich w ould w o rk to the b e s t p o s s ib le ad v an tag e of the

s tu d e n t cou ld be c o n s id e re d . "T he com m on e x p e r ie n c e is th a t the s tu ­

d e n t’s w ork ing tim e d u rin g the th re e y e a r s of the law c o u rse is co m p le te ly

o ccu p ied in the study of the p r in c ip le s of the law , " s ta te d S tone.

Stone d id no t r e je c t the s tu d e n ts ’ n eed fo r w o rk in m a te r ia ls

o th e r than th e p r in c ip le s of law ; r a th e r he a rg u e d th a t once ou t of school

the s tu d en t w ould have no fu r th e r o p p o rtu n ity to study th e se p r in c ip le s

u n d e r the gu idance of the p r o fe s s o r . On the o th e r h an d . Stone a rg u e d ,

upon e n te r in g p ra c t ic e the s tu d en t does hav e an o p p o rtu n ity to conduct

a " le g a l a id d is p e n s a ry . " I t d o es no t m a t te r , a c c o rd in g to S tone,

^^H arlan F . Stone, "T he F u n c tio n of the A m e ric a n U n iv e rs ity L aw School, " P ro c e e d in g s of the E lev en th A nnual M eeting of the A s s o c i­a tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 11 (1911), p . 61.

IS lb id . , p . 68. l^ ib id .

102

w h e th e r o r n o t th e young a tto rn e y a v a ils h im se lf of the o p p o rtu n ity to

le a r n th e se ad d itio n a l m a te r ia ls of law p ra c t ic e , i t i s s t i l l t ru e th a t th is

o p p o rtu n ity i s b e t te r than anything the law school cou ld develop to a p p ro ­

x im ate the co n d itio n s of p r a c t ic e . "How, th en , " a sk e d S tone, "can th e r e

be any q u e s tio n b u t th a t the ’leg a l a id d is p e n s a ry ’ and the m o o t c o u r t,

w hen they d isp la c e any su b s ta n tia l p a r t of the c u r r ic u lu m , d ea lin g s c ie n ­

t if ic a lly w ith le g a l p r in c ip le s o r w ith le g a l th e o r ie s , c o s t m o re than

they a r e w o rth ?

S to n e 's co n c lu s io n w as th a t law sch o o ls should a d v ise th e i r s tu ­

d en ts to o b ta in th is type of e x p e rie n c e in v aca tio n tim e and a f te r the

co m p le tio n of the law c o u rse . He a lso w as w illing to p e r m it s tu d e n t-

o rg a n iz e d c lu b s fo r p r a c t ic e , a s long a s " . . , the le g a l a id d isp e n s a ry

fe a tu re of the c u r r ic u lu m is su b o rd in a te d , a s i t should b e , to the m ain

b u s in e s s of the law sch o o l, w hich is : sound, th e o re tic a l tra in in g by

21co m p eten t in s t r u c to r s of p ra c t ic a l e x p e r ie n c e , "

In 1913, H en ry M . B a te s speak ing in h is p r e s id e n tia l a d d re s s to

the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw Schools re p lie d to S tone. F i r s t , B a te s

ta lk ed abou t the p o p u la r c r i t ic is m s of ju d ic ia l p ro c e d u re s , the in e ff i­

c ien cy and d e lay in the c o u r ts . He added th a t inadequate g e n e ra l

ed u ca tio n p ro d u c e d " , . . n a r ro w n e s s of v is io n , p ro fe s s io n a l in e ffic ien cy

20 Ib id . 2 1 ib id ., p . 69.

103

and n eg le c t of e th ic a l c o n s id e ra tio n s , . . . "^2 E ven though m o s t law ­

y e r s re m a in ab le and u p r ig h t. B a te s sa id , th e se in ad eq u ac ie s h av e

se rio u s ly im p a ire d the " , , , u s e fu ln e s s , the in flu en ce and the p re s t ig e

of the B a r a s a w hole , "

To h e lp re m e d y the cond itions giving r i s e to th e se c r i t i c i s m s .

B a te s p ro p o se d th a t law sch o o ls should in c r e a s e the am ount of w o rk in

t r i a l p ra c t ic e and p ro c e d u re . He no ted th a t th e p ro c e s s of d e c is io n ­

m aking w hich ta k e s p la c e in c o u r t h a s c e r ta in b a s ic th e o r ie s and p r in c ip le s .

He fe lt th a t the teach in g of th e se to the law s tu d en ts w ould f a c i l i ta te the

n eeded r e fo rm s .

It i s n e c e s s a r y to look m o re c lo se ly a t th is speech to see w hat

the 1913 A A IjS P r e s id e n t m e a n t w hen he spoke of teach in g p r a c t ic e and

p ro c e d u re . S p ec ific a lly , he d id no t m ean the teach in g of e lo cu tio n w hich

w as p o p u la r a t the tim e . T h is i s w hat he sa id in th a t r e s p e c t .

H e re in l i e s one of the ch ie f b e n e f its of & p ro p e r ly conducted p ra c t ic e c o u r t , one conducted n o t fo r th e tra in in g in fo re n s ic speak ing , n o r fo r a m e re advance r e h e a r s a l of t r i a l in c o u r t , b u t a s th e c ro w n in g , v iv ify ing s tep in a c a re fu l study of the b a s ic p r in c ip le s of t r i a l ,

T h is s ta te m e n t sa y s a s w e ll a s any th u s f a r p re s e n te d w hat w as the d is ­

tin c tio n in the m in d s of the le g a l e d u c a to rs b e tw een speech tra in in g and

^^H en ry M , B a te s , "A d d re ss of the P r e s id e n t , " P ro c e e d in g s of the T h ir te e n th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S chools, V ol. 13 (1913), p . 36.

2 3 ib id ., p . 37,

104

the study of the t r i a l d e c is io n -m ak in g p r o c e s s . Q uite freq u e n tly such a

s ta te m e n t is m ade in w hich the im p lie d m ean ing i s th a t tra in in g fo r

sp eech involved only v o ic e , d ic tio n , and g e s tu r e - - th e tra d itio n a l c o n c e rn s

of e locu tion . T h e se m en a s s o c ia te d th is type of tra in in g w ith the so p h is t

o r s h y s te r , and a c c o rd in g ly re je c te d i t w h e re v e r p o s s ib le . On the o th e r

hand , they re c o g n iz e d a n eed fo r stu d y , im p ro v em e n t, and tra in in g in

the ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s i t s e l f , w hich c a lle d fo r an a n a ly s is of a co m p le te

rh e to r ic a l th e o ry .

No o th e r sch o o l r e p re s e n ts the ph ilosophy of le g a l education

w hich in c lu d es the function of s o -c a l le d p r a c t ic a l tra in in g a s w e ll a s the

U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan Law School. F ro m i t s beg inn ing in 1859, the

school

. . . faced the n eed to p ro v id e tra in in g in the sk ills of an ad v o ca te , and the co n seq u en t p ro b le m of d e te rm in in g w hat m ean s w ould b e s t in c u lc a te such s k il ls . The c le rk -a p p re n t ic e - ship in the o ffice of a p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y (w hatever i t s o th e r d e fic ie n c ie s) h a d s a tis fa c to r i ly su p p lied th is p o r tio n of the la w y e r’s p r e p a ra t io n fo r p r a c t ic e , and m uch thought w as given to the p ro b le m of how to a c co m p lish the sam e r e s u l t w ith in a u n iv e rs i ty . The s te p s tak en to p re p a re s tu d en ts fo r the r e a l i t ie s of a c tu a l p ra c t ic e le d to the c h a ra c te r iz a tio n of M ichigan a s a " p ra c t ic a l" law sch o o l. T h e se s tep s inc luded ex ten s iv e c o u rs e w o rk in p lead in g and p ro c e d u re . . . and the e s ta b lish m e n t of p r a c t ic e t r ib u n a ls , known o r ig in a lly a s M oot C o u rts and Club C o u rts and la te r a s P r a c t ic e C o u rts and C ase C lubs, w h e re s tu d en ts could gain e x p e rie n c e in both t r i a l and ap p e lla te p r a c t ic e . In ad d itio n , b e tw een 1887 and 1916,

105

c o u rs e s in E lo cu tio n and O ra to ry w e re o ffe re d in the Law D e p a rtm e n t and the an n u a l A nnouncem ent n o te d v a r io u s o r a to r ic a l a s so c ia tio n s an d co m p e titio n s b e tw een 1897 and 1927.24

What m o st sch ools e ith er d iscouraged , or perm itted the students

to do on their own tim e, the U n iversity of M ichigan Law School required

from its start. Both appellate argum ents b efore ju d ges, and jury

tr ia ls in which the case w as ca rr ied from its beginning, through the

p lead in gs, obtaining of a ju ry , exam ination of w itn e ss e s , statem ents

and argum ents w ere required of students at M ichigan. 25 The students

at M ichigan w ere encouraged in th eir in te r e st in liter a ry and o ra to r ica l

a sso c ia tio n s; the Announcem ent of the Law School in the 1888-1889

sch oo l year stated th is philosophy.

I t is im p o r ta n t fo r th o se who study the la w w ith the v iew of beco m in g a d v o ca te s , th a t th ey should give a tte n tio n to the su b je c t of fo re n s ic e lo q u en ce , the b e t te r to equip th em fo r the p e rfo rm a n c e of th e ir d u tie s a s a d v o c a te s . I t i s a m is ta k e to suppose th a t ex ce llen cy in speak ing is s im p ly a g ift of n a tu re , and no t the r e s u l t of p a tie n t and p e r s i s te n t la b o r and study. In s tru c tio n in e lo cu tio n an d o ra to ry is th e r e fo re n e c e s s a ry to law s tu d en ts . The ju n io r c la s s re c e iv e in s tru c t io n in v o ca l c u ltu re , a r t ic u la tio n and p ro n u n c ia tio n ; p o s itio n and g e s tu re ; q u a lity and fo rc e of v o ic e . Aj i advanced c o u rs e in o ra to ry h a s b een a r ra n g e d fo r the s e n io r c la s s . . . .2&

24Elizabeth Caspar Brow n, L egal Education at M ichigan 1859- 1959 (Ann Arbor: The U n iversity of M ichigan Law School, 1959), p . 266.

25lb id . , p p . 234-235 .

Z6"U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan L aw School, A nnounc em en t, 1888-1889, in B ro w n , o£, c i t . , p . 232.

106

T h e se c o u r s e s w e re o ffe red u n til 1916; a f te r th a t , i t w as reco m m en d ed

th a t the s tu d en t o b ta in the tra in in g p r io r to e n te r in g law schoo l,

E d so n R . S underland w as the m an m o s t c lo se ly a s s o c ia te d w ith

the p ra c tic e c o u r s e s a t M ich igan d u rin g the e a r ly p a r t of the 20th C en­

tu ry , W riting in 1903, he e m p h a s iz e d th a t the ch ief function of the law

schoo l i s to f it m en fo r the p r a c t ic e of the law . He c la im ed th a t an

a tte m p t to m ak e the law school c u r r ic u lu m a s p r a c t ic a l a s p o s s ib le did

n o t ten d to n a r ro w i t , but r a th e r such an a tte m p t he c o n s id e re d in a c c o rd

w ith the l ib e ra liz in g ten d en c ie s of u n iv e rs ity c u ltu re , He m ade a

d i r e c t ch a llen g e to th o se who b e lie v e d the fu n ctio n of the law schoo l

len d ed w ith the teach in g of p r in c ip le s . N oting th a t m o s t of the s tu d en ts

in law schoo l a r e th e re to le a r n how to p ra c t ic e law , he sa id " , , , i t

i s no t uncom m on fo r a m an to be v e ry w ell in fo rm ed about the law , and

a t the sam e tim e be a com plete fa i lu re a s a la w y e r , , , , S underland ,

a ls o , a d m itte d th a t know ledge of the p r in c ip le s w as in d isp e n sa b le , and

th a t a b ili ty in p ro c e d u re d id no t a lone allow fo r s u c c e ss e i th e r . H is

co n c lu s io n is obv ious: the only p ro p e r function of a law schoo l is to p r o ­

v ide ed u ca tio n fo r the p ra c tic e of law , and such ed u ca tio n n e c e s s a r i ly

^^E d so n R , S underland , "T he P ra c t ic e C o u r t ," M ich igan A lu m ­n u s , V ol, 9 (1903), p , 295.

28 ib id ,

107

in c lu d ed both the teach in g of p r in c ip le s and the p ro v is io n of a "know ­

led g e of the m e a n s w h ereb y the p r in c ip le s of the law a r e a p p lied to

p a r t ic u la r c o n tro v e rs ie s ,

W riting ag a in in 1912, S underland again a d d re s s e d h im se lf to

th is d iffe ren ce of opinion. He c la im e d th a t th e re could only be two

r e a s o n s fo r exclud ing the teach ing of p r a c t ic e f ro m the law c u r r ic u lu m - -

e i th e r i t canno t be su c c e ss fu lly tau g h t o r i t does no t b e long to the p ro p e r

fu n c tio n of the law school, He d is m is s e d the f i r s t re a s o n by a s s e r t in g

th a t p ra c tic e h ad b een su c ce ss fu lly tau g h t fo r y e a r s . He c la im e d the

s u c c e s s w as u n q u es tio n ed , b u t co m m en ts by o th e r le g a l e d u c a to rs

re p e a te d ly show th a t th e re w as s e r io u s q u estio n a s to the su c c e ss w ith

w hich p r a c t ic e cou ld be taugh t,

S u n d e rla n d 's co m m en ts , though , w e re d ire c te d to w ard p ro v in g

th a t p ra c t ic e w as a p ro p e r p a r t of th e fu n ctio n of the law sch o o l. He

d iv id ed th is o b jec tio n in to two p a r ts : e i th e r p ra c tic e w as of no im p o r t­

an ce in i ts e lf , o r the teach in g of p ra c t ic e would d im in ish the tim e

a v a ila b le fo r o th e r m o re im p o rta n t s u b je c ts ,

In in tro d u c in g h is a rg u m e n ts , S underland m a k e s the follow ing

c o m p a riso n w hich te l ls som ething abou t h is u n d ers tan d in g of rh e to r ic

2 9 lb id ,, p , 296,

^^E dson R , S underland , "T h e A r t of L eg a l P r a c t ic e , " M ichigan A lu m n u s, V ol. 18 (1912), p , 252,

^^I b id . , p , 253,

108

a s w ell: " T h e re is no e s s e n t ia l d iffe ren ce in the re la t io n w hich p ra c t ic e

b e a r s to the study of law and th a t w hich co m p o sitio n b e a r s to the s tudy

of l i t e r a r y s ty le , . . . A know ledge of rh e to r ic w ill n e v e r m ake a w r i te r ;

a know ledge of the p r in c ip le s of law w ill n e v e r m a Ü a la w y e r. T h is

s ta te m e n t b e a r s c lo s e r ex am in a tio n in lig h t of a c u r io s ity about the

a u th o r 's u n d e rs tan d in g of the th e o r ie s of rh e to r ic . In co m p a riso n w ith

a c la s s ic a l d e fin itio n of r h e to r ic , S underland h a s co m m itted two e r r o r s .

F i r s t , he h a s concluded th a t rh e to r ic d e a ls so le ly w ith m ethod of c o m ­

p o s itio n , p ro b ab ly im p ly in g s ty le and a r ra n g e m e n t only . T h u s, he le a v e s

in v en tio n unm en tio n ed . T h is i s im p o rta n t to u n d e rs ta n d in g the second

e r r o r . Second, he h a s a s su m e d the re la t io n b e tw een know ledge of le g a l

p r in c ip le s and the p r a c t ic e of law is the sam e a s th a t be tw een know ledge

of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry and th e p ra c t ic e of co m m u n ica tio n . H ere he m a k e s

an e r r o r com m on to le g a l e d u c a to r s - -h e d iv id es le g a l ed ucation in to

tw o p a r t s - - th e o r y and p r a c t ic e - - a n d a s su m e s th a t the th e o ry p ro v id e s

in fo rm a tio n a s to how the s tu d en t should behave in p r a c t ic e . He a s s u m e s

th a t knowing the re a so n in g tak en by ju d g es in p re v io u s c a s e s i s su ff ic ie n t

fo r the s tuden t in le a rn in g the re a so n in g of p e rs u a s io n n e c e s s a ry to

in fluence fu tu re ju d g e s .

If th is a s su m p tio n i s a c ce p ted , then i t i s n e c e s s a ry to a g re e w ith

S underland th a t a l l th a t r e m a in s is to p ro v id e the s tu d en t w ith an

^ ^ Ib id ., p . 254.

109

o p p o rtu n ity to t r y - o u t the re a so n in g and fa c ts th u s le a rn e d . B u t r h e to r ­

ic a l th e o ry w ould r e je c t the a s su m p tio n . A r is to t le , and th o se who hav e

fo llow ed h im h av e a g re e d th a t p ro o f r e q u ire s m o re th an f a c ts and

rea so n in g ; i t i s a lso n e c e s s a r y to study the o th e r m o d es of p r o o f - - e th o s

and p a th o s - -a n d the th e o r ie s of app ly ing th e se m o d es of p ro o f to the

p a r t ic u la r s itu a tio n , ju d g e , and sp e a k e r . T h u s, if S u n d erlan d is to

a rg u e th a t th e fu n c tio n of the law schoo l " . . . ought to b e to develop

good la w y e rs so f a r a s . . . m e a n s w ill a l lo w ," th en he should inc lude

n o t only the s tu d y of th e p r in c ip le s of the law , b u t he should a lso add a

study of the th e o r ie s of how Üie p r in c ip le s m ay m o s t e ffec tiv e ly be

ap p lied in the p a r t ic u la r s itu a tio n . T h u s , S u n d erlan d ’s co n cep tio n of

the fun ctio n of th e law school i s c o n s is te n t w ith c la s s ic a l th e o r ie s of

r h e to r ic , b u t h is u n d e rs tan d in g of rh e to r ic i ts e lf i s in ad eq u a te .

W ithout re a liz in g i t , S u n d erlan d s tre n g th e n e d the c a se fo r the

teach in g of r h e to r ic in the sam e a r t ic le . He a s s e r t s th a t the c a se s y s ­

tem i s only a h a lf-w a y p o in t in le g a l ed u ca tio n . T h ro u g h the study of

c a s e s , the s tu d e n t i s m oved f ro m the a b s t r a c t r e a lm of le g a l th e o ry in to

the c o n c re te a r e n a of a c tu a l l i t ig a tio n . B ut i t s t i l l on ly te l l s the

s tu d en t how o th e r s have ap p lied th e law , and i t could b e added p a r e n ­

th e tic a lly th a t i t te l l s h im la rg e ly how only a p p e lla te ju d g e s h av e ap p lied

the law , and ig n o re s fo r the m o s t p a r t the e f fo r ts of th e la w y e rs , ju ry ,

33ibid.

110

and judge in the c o u r t of o r ig in a l ju r is d ic t io n . The c a s e sy s te m , say s

S u n d erlan d , p ro v e s to the s tu d en t th a t the law i s an a p p lied sc ien ce

w ithout p e rm it t in g h im in s tru c tio n in the ap p lica tio n of i t . The key

a rg u m e n t in fa v o r of in s tru c tio n in the a p p lica tio n of p r in c ip le s i s given

in th is p a ra g ra p h .

The m e re sc h o la r i s d ish e a r te n e d o v er the u n c e r ta in tie s of the law . F o r h im they m ak k im p e rfe c tio n and in c o m p le te ­n e s s , and he looks fo rw a rd to the tim e when le g a l s ta n d a rd s w ill be so f a r p e r fe c te d th a t the a n s w e rs to leg a l p ro b le m s m ay be w o rk ed out w ith a c c u ra c y and p re c is io n . He w ould app ly the c lo se lo g ic of the m a th e m a tic ia n to the fa c ts and law of the c a s e , and w ould h ave the c o r r e c t r e s u l t follow in v a r ia b ly f ro m c o r r e c t p r e m is e s . The la w y e r know s b e t te r . He u n d e rs ta n d s th a t th e r e i s no ab so lu te s ta n d a rd p o ss ib le ; th a t r e v e r s e d c a s e s and d isse n tin g op in ions only e m p h a s iz e the hum an e le m e n t in le g a l c o n tro v e rs ie s ; th a t two ju d g es m ay d iffe r d ia m e tr ic a lly and n e ith e r be w rong; th a t r ig h t and w rong , a s ap p lied to the so lu tio n of le g a l p ro b le m s , a r e p u re ly re la tiv e t e r m s .

In e s s e n c e , he i s say ing th a t the s tu d en t m u s t be b ro u g h t to

r e a l iz e th a t law d ea ls in p ro b a b ili t ie s and th a t the s tu d en t m u s t have an

o p p o rtu n ity to le a rn how to d ea l w ith the p r in c ip le s le a rn e d f ro m the

c a se m eth o d in the a c tu a l and u n c e r ta in s itu a tio n . T h is , of c o u rse , is

one of th e m o s t a n c ie n t of r h e to r ic a l th e o r ie s .

T h u s , S underland w ould see a s a m a jo r function of the law school

the p ro v is io n of te a ch in g , p r a c t ic e , and c r i t ic is m in the ap p lica tio n of

the law . T he c r i t ic i s m w ould no t b e d ire c te d to w ard the p ro p e r u se of

3 4 ib id ,, p , 255,

I l l

the p r in c ip le s in a rg u m e n t, and the ap p lic a tio n of the a rg u m e n t to a given

au d ien ce . He s u m m a r iz e s h is opinion of th e function of the law schoo l

w ith th e se w o rd s.

The law y er . . . i s a p ro fe s s io n a l m an w ith w hom know ­ledge is bu t a m e a n s to a p r a c t ic a l end . If he canno t u se h is know ledge i t i s of no value to h im . He can n e v e r a p p re c ia te w hat he knows u n til he le a rn s how to u se it; he can n ev e r know how to a c q u ire know ledge u n til he u n d e rs ta n d s how h is know ledge is to be em ployed . It is to ro u n d ou t the law schoo l c u r r ic u lu m in to a p r a c t ic a l a s w ell a s a th e o re t ic a l c o u rse , to supp lem en t th e c a s e sy s te m in m ak in g the law c o n c re te , and to develop the study of law a s a sc ie n ce w hich i s p r im a r i ly to be app lied to th e n ee d s of a co m plex so c ie ty , th a t the teach in g of p r a c t ic e h a s taken a p ro m in e n t p lace in the L aw D ep a rtm en t of th e U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan .

A lfred Z. R eed , in h is re v iew of le g a l ed u ca tio n fo r 1929, p o in ts

ou t th a t the figh t b e tw een p ra c t i t io n e r s and e d u c a to rs i s m o re em o tio n a l

th an n e c e s s a ry , a good d e a l of the a rg u m e n t a r is in g f ro m se n tim e n t

r a th e r than lo g ic . R eed , re s p e c te d a s a n e u tra l o b s e rv e r (being

n e ith e r a law y er n o r a law te a c h e r) re a s o n s th a t i t i s the duty of th e law

school to look a f te r the p r a c t ic a l tra in in g of the s tu d en ts , b u t h e i s su re

th a t the p o p u la r m eth o d of the m o o t c o u r t i s u n s a tis fa c to ry . He c o n ­

c lu d es th a t only th ro u g h a c tu a l c o n tac t w ith r e a l c lie n ts could a la w y e r

le a rn the ap p lica tio n of th e leg a l p r in c ip le s . T h u s, R eed su g g es te d the

^^I b id . , p . 260,

3^A lfred Z , R eed , R eview of L e g a l E d u ca tio n in the U n ited S ta tes and C anada fo r the Y e a r 1929 (New Y ork: C arn eg ie F o u n d a tio n fo r the A dvancem ent of T e ach in g , 1930), p . 3,

112

d ev e lo p m en t of le g a l a id c lin ic s such a s a r e now in e x is te n c e . H is

r e a s o n fo r ob jec ting to m o o t c o u r ts w as th a t law schoo ls m ay th u s . .

be en co u rag ed to devote to th e se a c t iv i t ie s a g r e a te r p ro p o rtio n of th e ir

s tu d e n ts ’ tim e than ought to b e d iv e r te d f ro m th e ir p r im a ry r e s p o n s i ­

b i l i ty —in cu lca tio n of a sc ie n tif ic know ledge of the law .

The p ro b le m of d e te rm in in g a rh e to r ic of A m e ric a n le g a l p r o c e s s e s

i s f ru s t r a te d , th e r e fo re , f ro m the s ta r t b y a fundam en tal d is a g re e m e n t

a s to the function of a law school. In h is 1921 r e p o r t on le g a l ed u ca tio n ,

R eed s ta te d the p ro b le m e ffec tiv e ly . He sa id th a t the f i r s t p ro b le m

fac in g the law school w as a d e c is io n on th e am oun t and type of n o n -th e o -

r e t ic a l education they ought to p ro v id e ; b u t second , R eed a s s e r te d th a t

th e r e a l p ro b le m w as th e d e te rm in a tio n an d co o rd in a tio n of r o le s to be

d iv id ed am ong the u n d e rg ra d u a te c o lle g e s , the law sch o o ls , and the

a s so c ia tio n s of p ra c tic in g la w y e rs , and th e b a r e x a m in e rs . T he ty p ic a l

p a t te rn , acco rd in g to R eed , i s fo r each of th e se th re e u n its to ig n o re

the w o rk of the o th e r s , the r e s u l t be in g th a t each a tte m p ts to tak e a s

m uch of the e d u ca tio n a l p ro c e s s in to i t s own p ro g ra m a s p o s s ib le , w ith ­

ou t r e g a rd to the ex p e n se . "T he f in a l s tag e in ed u ca tio n a l dev elo p m en t

i s a t ta in e d ," co n c lu d es R eed , "when the th re e c e n tre s le a r n to co o p e ra te

in s te a d of to co m p e te . " "A sing le l a r g e r o rg an iz a tio n , " he co n tinued ,

3 7 ib id . , p. 10.

3® A lfred Z . R e e d , T ra in in g fo r th e P u b lic P r o f e s s io n o f th e L a w , op . c i t . , p . 280.

l is

" th e s e v e ra l p a r t s of w hich a r e m u tu a lly su p p o rtin g in a s p i r i t of su b o r­

d ination to the com m on w hole, i s the go a l to w ard w hich A m e r ic a n le g a l

education i s m o v in g , "39

The d ia lo g u e on the p ro p e r fu n c tio n of the law school p ro d u ce d ,

o v e r the y e a r s , a good d ea l m o re ta lk th an ac tio n . The law sch o o ls co n ­

tin u ed to o p e ra te on the p a t te rn s e t b y the H a rv a rd L aw School and thus

pu t in o s t of th e i r e f fo r ts to w ard the study of le g a l p r in c ip le s th ro u g h the

c a se m ethod . T h is d id no t, h o w e v e r, p re v e n t som e law schoo l le a d e r s

fro m continuing th e i r p ro te s t .

A fte r so m e y e a r s of q u ie t, th e p r o te s t s cam e ag a in d u rin g and

im m ed ia te ly fo llow ing W orld W ar II. In a 1943 r e p o r t of the C o m m ittee

on A im s and O b je c tiv e s of L eg a l E d u c a tio n , A lb e r t J . H arn o su b m itte d

a m in o rity op in ion b la s tin g h is c o lle a g u e s fo r th e ir f a i lu re to ch an g e .

"I w ish to u rg e upon the schoo ls and th e b a r th a t th ey engage in an even

m o re s ig n if ic a n t an d sea rc h in g a n a ly s is of th e m se lv e s . . . sa id

H arn o . He c la im e d th a t th e re h a d b e e n a fa i lu re to define c le a r ly

the ro le of the la w y e r in the a f f a ir s of the na tio n . T h e re w as no q u es tio n

^^Ibid .

A lb e r t J . H a rn o , "S e p a ra te S ta tem en t in R e p o rt of C o m m ittee on A im s and O b je c tiv e s of L eg a l E d u c a tio n , " H andbook of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 41 (1943), p . 139.

114

in H arn o ’ s m in d th a t la w y e rs occup ied p o s it io n s of le a d e rsh ip , "B u t th a t

they m ake fu ll u se of the p o w ers of le a d e r s h ip w hich a r e th e i r s by v ir tu e

of the s tra te g ic p o s itio n they occupy in o u r so c ie ty m any w ill q u estio n ,

W hat w as n eed ed , sa id H arno , w as an ex tensive study of the

ta s k s of a law y er and w hat w as needed to fu lf il l them . A s a s ta r t , H arno

in d ica ted th a t he could c ite c e r ta in b a s ic an d e s se n tia l to o ls of a law y er.

T he law y er shou ld be p ro f ic ie n t in read in g . He should be ab le to re a d f a i r ly ra p id ly and w ith co m p reh en sio n of d iff i­cu lt p a s s a g e s . He should , in d eed , b e a m a s te r of w o rd s and te rm in o lo g y . He should be ad ep t in e3q> ression--in speak in g , w ritin g , and d ra f tin g . He need n o t b e an o ra to r , b u t a law y er who canno t e x p re s s h im se lf w ell o ra l ly i s only h a lf a one.A b ility to w rite c le a r ly and cogen tly i s a sine qua non. He should be ab le to th in k and be cap ab le of su sta in ed th ink ing ,

H arno concluded h is d is s e n tin g opinion b y ca llin g fo r a re v is io n of the

law school c u r r ic u la , even to the po in t of m o d ifica tio n of the c a s e

m ethod , to acc o m p lish the education in som e of the a r e a s m en tio n ed .

A t about the sam e tim e th a t H arn o w as e x p re ss in g h im se lf . The

Ohio S tate U n iv e rs ity C ollege of Law w as engaged in such a s tudy a s he

w as ca llin g fo r . S ta rtin g in 1939, a new c u rr ic u lu m w as adop ted a t

Ohio S tate a r is in g f ro m the th e s is th a t

, , , the im p a rtin g of in fo rm a tio n concern ing co n tro llin g le g a l co n cep ts an d p ro c e d u re s , w hile im p o rta n t, should n o t be the so le o b jec tiv e of le g a l education ; th a t pedagog ical e ffo r t should a t the sam e tim e be d ire c te d to w a rd (1) the cu ltiv a tio n of ad equate p ro fe s s io n a l, so c ia l, s c ie n tif ic and sc h o la s tic a tt i tu d e s .

4 1 lb id ,, pp, 139-140, ^^Tbid,, p , 140,

115

(2) the developm en t of such te c h n ic a l s k ills a s e ffec tiv e e x p re s s io n and office and co u rt p r a c t ic e , and (3) the s tim ­u la tio n of p o w ers of a n a ly s is and sy n th e s is , n o t only w ith r e s p e c t to s tr ic t ly ‘legal* m a te r ia ls b u t a lso a s to so c ia l, p o l i t ic a l , and econom ic m a t te r , . . .^ 3

In lig h t of the study of c u rr ic u lu m , s ta te d the r e p o r t of Dean

F ra n k R . S trong of the O .S .U . C ollege of L aw , the c a s e m ethod of

teach in g w as exposed to be no tab ly in ad eq u a te w ith r e g a rd to the teach in g

of s ta tu to ry c o n s tru c tio n , advo cacy , co u n se llin g , an d d ra ftin g , ^ A fte r

ten y e a r s of e x p e rim e n t. S tro n g re p o rte d , " E x p e r ie n c e w ith th e se c u r ­

r ic u la r innovations h a s com bined w ith a decade of a c tiv e fe rm e n t in

p ed ag o g ica l in q u iry to su g g e s t the g r e a t d e s ir a b i l i ty , if n o t u rg en t

n e c e s s i ty , of fu r th e r im p ro v e m e n t of the law schoo l c u r r ic u lu m along

the lin e s en v isag ed ten y e a r s ago , In lin e w ith th is b e lie f , Ohio

State p r e p a re d an in v e n to ry of m a jo r le g a l c a p a c it ie s . Included in the

in v en to ry u n d er the h ead in g of d iffe re n tia l c a p a c it ie s w as study in le g a l

m ethod . The ob jec tive of th is w as to im p a r t a w o rk in g u n d ers tan d in g of

the ", , , f lu id ity of lan g u ag e , , , the p r in c ip le s of sy llo g is tic and

inductive lo g ic ; of the p r in c ip le s of re a so n in g by an a lo g y and analyzing

by c la s s if ic a tio n , , , ,

^ ^ F ra n k R, S trong , "A New C u rric u lu m fo r th e C ollege of Law of The Ohio State U n iv e r s i ty ," Ohio State L aw J o u rn a l , V ol, 11, No, 1 (W in te r, 1950), p, 44,

"^^Ibid,, p, 45, ^ % id ., p. 44, ^% i d . , p, 46,

116

Included w ith in a c a te g o ry c a lle d le g a l s k ills w e re the su b d iv is io n s

"D ia le c tic a l, " and "T ec h n ic a l, " W ithin the fo rm e r c a te g o ry w as inc lu d ed

fa c t d isc r im in a tio n , c a se a n a ly s is , s ta tu te a n a ly s is , le g a l sy n th e s is ,

and is s u e d isp o s itio n . In the l a t t e r w as le g a l advocacy : ad jec tiv e

w hich a im ed a t p ro v id in g te c h n ic a l c a p a c itie s fo r the co m p e ten t p r e s e n ­

ta tio n of is s u e s b e fo re le g is la tiv e and ad ju d ica tiv e b o d ie s ; and leg a l

advocacy : a rg u m e n ta tiv e , w hich p ro p o se d to develop a cap ac ity fo r

p e rs u a s iv e a rg u m e n ta tio n of i s s u e s b e fo re le g is la tiv e and ad ju d ica tiv e

b o d ie s . L e g a l d ra f tsm a n sh ip , r e s e a r c h , and w ritin g w e re o th e r sk ills

in c lu d ed ,

A s opposed to d iffe re n tia l c a p a c it ie s , the O .S . U. r e p o r t inc luded

th o se ca lle d " In te g ra l. " W ithin th is group w e re the su b d iv is io n s of

le g a l co u n se llin g , le g a l n eg o tia tio n , le g a l c o n te s ta tio n , and le g a l p la n ­

n ing . The d e s c r ip tio n of the o b jec tiv e of le g a l n eg o tia tio n w as " . . .

to develop c a p a c ity in bo th a d je c tiv e and su b stan tiv e re p re s e n ta t io n of

in te r e s ts th ro u g h in fo rm a l, n o n - lit ig io u s p ro c e d u re s ,

D ean S trong re p o r te d in 1950 th a t h is co lleg e of law then o ffe red

c u r r ic u la r w o rk in a l l the a r e a s d is c u s s e d above w ith the excep tion of

leg a l advocacy: a rg u m e n ta tiv e , w hich he fe l t w as p ro v id e d th rough the

m oot c o u r t p ro g ra m . He in d ic a te d th a t the school h a d even e x p e r i­

m en ted w ith a c o u rse in le g a l n eg o tia tio n ,

4% Ibid,, pp . 4 6 -47 . ^® Ibid ,, p . 48,

117

In 1944 the C om m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m of the A sso c ia tio n of

A m e ric a n L aw S chools c a lle d fo r a change in the w ay c a s ë - teach in g w as

p e rfo rm e d . T he tra d it io n a l a p p ro a c h to the c a se m e th o d , a s d e riv e d

f ro m A m es , fo cu se d on only one le v e l of the c a s e s : w h at i s the r ig h t

o r b e s t re a d in g of the opinion a t the ju d ic ia l le v e l? T h a t i s , in the

c la s s the in s t r u c to r d is c u s s e d the m ean in g of the ju d ic ia l d e c is io n in

lig h t of h is (the in s t r u c to r ’s) o p in io n s, The C o m m ittee r e p o r t id en ­

tif ie d two ad d itio n a l le v e ls p o s s ib le in c a s e - te a c h in g . F i r s t , the

a d v o c a te ’s le v e l, "W hat read in g w ill the c a se o r c a s e s b e a r , in te rm s

of o u r c o r r e c t d o c tr in a l te c h n iq u es , and can th a t rea d in g b e m ade n o t

m e re ly c o lo ra b le b u t re a l ly p e r s u a s iv e (to a p a r t ic u la r tr ib u n a l)?

The study of th e a rg u m e n ts a c tu a lly m ad e by co u n se l o r th o se w hich

m ig h t have b e e n m ad e fo r the p la in tiff and then the d e fen d an t, sa id the

r e p o r t , once m ad e up a la rg e p a r t of the c a s e - te a c h in g of L an g d e ll a t

H a rv a rd , " T h is ad v o c a te ’s a p p ro a c h ," co n tin u es the r e p o r t , " is a v i ta l

ad d itio n to the ju d ic ia l o r law p r o f e s s o r ’s le v e l of d is c u s s io n . I t is

w o rth s e p a ra te study and d r i l l , T he C o m m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m p r o ­

p o se d to devo te an e n tire s e m e s te r ’s w o rk to th is side of c a s e study,

^ '^"R ep o rt of the C o m m ittee on C u rric u lu m !' H andbook of A s s o c ­ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw Schools and P ro c e e d in g s of the F o r ty - s e c o n d M eetin g , V ol, 42 (1944), p , 173,

3®’l b i d . , p , 174, 5 'llb id ,

118

”, . . w ith the ju d ic ia l le v e l th e re t r e a te d ch ie fly a s the fa c to r w hich

l im its and g u id es ad v o cacy , a s being the le v e l to w hich advocacy m u s t

ap p ea l and on w hich p e rs u a s io n m u s t p ro v e e ffec tiv e , , , , "W hen

C ardozo s p o k e ,” co n c lu d es the r e p o r t , "of m o s t ap p ea ls a s fo red o o m ed

in th e i r o u tco m e , h e spoke f ro m the s tan d p o in t of one w orking on th e

ju d ic ia l le v e l, ” B u t, th ey co n tin u e , he a lso spoke a s a judge fac ed w ith

law y e r a f te r la w y e r who cam e b e fo re h im who h ad n o t ", , , le a rn e d in

sch o o l th a t the c a s e s o ffe r m any d o c tr in a l p o s s ib i l i t ie s on the a d v o c a te ’s

le v e l , b u t th a t i t i s the c o u r t 's job to r e a d a s the so le c o r r e c t p o s s i ­

b il i ty som e one of the te c h n ic a l p o s s ib i l i t ie s w hich m ak es fo r s e n se and

ju s t ic e ,

The c o m m itte e spoke out a g a in s t the th e o ry th a t the le a rn in g th a t

m ig h t com e f ro m such an a p p ro ach to le g a l ed ucation a s m en tioned

above ought to b e le f t a t th e le v e l of b y -p ro d u c t of the study of p r in c ip le s

a lo n e , "T he d e s ir e d v a lu e s , , , , m u s t u n d e r p r e s e n t cond itions be

m ad e in to p ro d u c ts c o n sc io u s ly sought, a t the expense of su b s tan tiv e

c o v e rag e and by c o n ce n tra tio n upon one o r a few s k il ls a t a t im e , , , .

To i l lu s t r a te w hat k ind of study they p ro p o se d , the c o m m itte e

m en tio n ed a p p e lla te advocacy . The p h a se of le g a l p r a c t ic e , they s a id ,

^^Ib id . ^ % i d , , pp , 174-175. ^ % i d . , p , 176,

119

w hich in v o lv es the p re p a ra t io n of the ap p e lla te b r ie f and p re se n tin g the

o ra l a rg u m e n t, . . i s a d is tin c tiv e a r e a w hich does no t depend upon

p e c u lia r e x p e r tn e ss in any g iven le g a l s u b je c t-m a tte r , . . , ” 55 "T h e re

should be no doubt, " say s the C o m m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m , " th a t advocacy

is an a r t capab le of co m m u n ica tio n ; bo th the G re ek s and the S c h o la s tic s

in th e i r day d e m o n s tra te d th a t i t i s , T h is i s a s c lo se a s th e co m m ittee

cam e to ca llin g fo r th a n c ie n t rh e to r ic a l th e o ry to a s s i s t th em in th e i r

s e a rc h fo r im p ro v em en ts in le g a l education .

The value of th is r e p o r t to the p r e s e n t study is no t so m u ch in the

id e a s fo r im p ro v em e n t in law teach in g a s i t i s in the re p re s e n ta t io n of

the s ta tu s of th inking on rh e to r ic a l th e o ry a s a p a r t of the p r o c e s s of law .

The r e p o r t s e rv e s b o th a s a c r itiq u e of com m on p ra c t ic e in law sch o o ls

in fa ilin g to re co g n ize the r h e to r ic a l a sp e c ts of le g a l p ra c t ic e and th u s

to fo rm u la te a r h e to r ic a l th e o ry to m e e t the n e e d s , and i t s e rv e s a s an

i l lu s tr a t io n of the re c o g n itio n of th is fa c to r by som e le g a l e d u c a to rs . A s

w ill be seen in the fo llow ing sec tio n , th e re is no ev idence of a substcin tia l

e f fo r t to fu lf ill th is d e s i r e . On the c o n tra ry , a l l the ev idence su g g es ts

th a t in the c u rr ic u lu m m o s t of th e co n cen tra tio n re m a in s on p r in c ip le s

of law , and the p r a c t ic a l a s p e c ts (tha t i s , the rh e to r ic a l a s p e c ts , am ong

o th e rs ) a r e le f t to an o c c a s io n a l c o u rse o r e x t r a - c u r r ic u la r a c tiv ity .

S ^ ib id ., p . 185, 56ibid.

120

R ecogn ition of L eg a l R h e to ric in

L aw School C u rr ic u la

In lig h t of the p re c e d in g d isc u s s io n of the p ro p e r function of the

law sch o o l, the in v e s tig a tio n m ay now tu rn to a m o re sp ec ific ex am in a tio n

of the c u r r ic u la of the sch o o ls . A s s ta te d b e fo re , the e x ten t of r e c o g ­

n itio n of the c h a ra c te r of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry invo lved in the le g a l p ro c e s s ,

on the p a r t of le g a l e d u c a to rs , should be ev id en ced in the developm en t

of law schoo l c u r r ic u la . I t h a s a lre a d y b een s ta te d th a t the rh e to r ic a l

fu n c tio n s of law a r e ty p ic a lly c la s s if ie d w ith o th e r fu n c tio n s involved in

the a p p lic a tio n of le g a l p r in c ip le s u n d er the t i t le of p r a c t ic a l c o u rs e s ,

o r p ro c e d u ra l c o u rse s . T h u s , i t i s to th is a r e a of law schoo l in s tru c tio n

th a t one m u s t go to see ev id en ce of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry .

T h is ex am in atio n of c u r r ic u la w ill be d iv id ed in to two p a r ts .

F i r s t , the s ta ted o b je c tiv e s of p r a c t ic a l w o rk in law sch o o ls w ill be

exam in ed . Second, the co n ten t of th e se c o u r s e s w ill b e d isc u s s e d . V a r ­

ia tio n s e x is tin g o v er the y e a r s fro m sch o o l to school w ill b e esqposed b y

r e fe re n c e to r e p re s e n ta tiv e law schoo ls f ro m m o s t p a r t s of the nation .

The f i r s t q u es tio n p o sed , th e n , i s w hat i s the o b jec tiv e of p ra c t ic a l w o rk

in law sch o o ls?

O b jec tiv es of p r a c t ic a l w o rk in law sch o o ls

One of the s ta te d r e a s o n s fo r p r a c t ic a l o r r h e to r ic a l education in

the law sch o o ls is to p ro v id e fo r the im p ro v e m e n t of the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s

121

I ts e lf . The p o in t w as s ta te d in 1912 by E d w ard W, H in ton , D ean of the

U n iv e rs ity of M isso u ri L aw School: "I th ink i t m ig h t be sa id th a t the

v e ry g e n e ra l n eg le c t of p ro c e d u re in the law sch o o l i s one of the c a u s e s

th a t h av e led to the u n s a tis fa c to ry condition of o u r p ra c t ic e a t th is

t im e , "We have tu rn e d o u t a g en e ra tio n of la w y e rs , " he co n tin u ed ,

" sp len d id ly equipped in su b s ta n tiv e law , b u t w ith l i t t le tra in in g in p r o ­

c e d u re , They have b e e n le f t to p ick up th e ir p ro c e d u re h a p h a z a rd , and

th ey seem to have done i t r a th e r b ad ly , H in to n 's co n c lu sio n w as th a t

law sch o o ls should a im p ro c e d u re c o u rse s to w ard the c o r re c t io n of th is

p ro b le m .

One y e a r l a t e r , H e n ry M , B a te s of the U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan

L aw School spoke a s the P r e s id e n t of the A , A, L , S, and cam e to a

s im i la r co n c lu sio n . He n o ted th a t one of the g ro u n d s of p o p u la r d isc o n te n t

w ith th e le g a l sy s te m a ro s e f ro m the fa ilu re to in s i s t upon adequate

ed u ca tio n . He c la im e d th a t th is la c k p ro d u ced " , . , n a r ro w n e s s of

v is io n , p ro fe s s io n a l in e ffic ie n c y and n e g lec t of e th ic a l c o n s id e ra tio n s ,

w hich d e sp ite a m a jo r i ty of ab le and u p rig h t la w y e rs , [ h a s ] s e r io u s ly

im p a ire d the u s e fu ln e s s , the in fluence and the p r e s t ig e of the B a r a s a

5?E dw ard W, H in ton , "D iscu ss io n of th e A d d re s s of the P r e s i ­d en t, " P ro c e e d in g s of the T w elfth A nnual M eetin g of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S chools, V ol, 12 (1912), p , 17,

58ibid ,

122

w h o le , "59 A gain , a s h ad the o th e r s , B a tes fe l t th a t a n e c e s s a ry

o b je c tiv e of p ra c t ic a l tra in in g in law schoo ls w as to h e lp a m e lio ra te the

p ro b le m s w ith in the le g a l sy s te m ,

E dson R , S u n derland , a lso speaking a t th e 1913 m eetin g of the

A , A . L , S , , m ade a th o ro u g h a n a ly s is of th is o b jec tiv e of p ra c t ic a l le g a l

ed u ca tio n . He began b y speak ing of the g e n e ra l in d ic tm e n t of pub lic

op in ion of a ll so c ia l in s ti tu tio n s , and noting th a t the law w as c e r ta in ly

am o n g th o se u n d e r c r i t ic i s m . H ow ever, he sa id , i t w as not the law

i t s e l f b u t le g a l a d m in is tra tio n th a t w as being o b je c ted to . The s ta tu to ry

poB tion of the law a d ju s ts to pub lic opinion, he n o te d , th rough the m ed iu m

of p o p u la rly e le c te d r e p re s e n ta t iv e s in le g is la tu r e s . H ow ever, th e ad m in ­

is t r a t io n of the law is u n d e r the c o n tro l of the la w y e rs , who a r e no t

re sp o n s ib le to the p u b lic , " D is c re t io n ," S un d erlan d com m en ted , " n e c e s ­

s a r i ly p lay s so la rg e a p a r t in ju d ic ia l a d m in is tra tio n , and p e rso n a l

c a p a c ity and sk ill a r e such d e te rm in in g f a c to rs in the com plex p ro b le m s

of p ro fe s s io n a l w o rk of a l l k in d s , , , " th a t th e re i s l i t t le the le g is la tu r e s

c an do to c o n tro l i t , B ut w hile the a d m in is tra tio n of ju s tic e m ay no t

b e a s w e ll c o n tro lle d by le g is la tu r e s , i t do es fa ll u n d e r the in fluence of

^9H enry M, B a te s , "A d d re ss of the P r e s id e n t ," P ro c e e d in g s of th e T h ir te e n th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m ericcin L aw Schools^ V ol, 13 (1913), p , 36,

^^E dson R , S u n d erlan d , "T each ing P r a c t ic e , " P ro c e e d in g s of th e T h ir te e n th , op, c i t , , p , 48,

123

the p u b lic . T ha t i s , th ro u g h the p ro c e s s of co m p e titio n am ong la w y e rs

th o se who o ffe r w hat th e p u b lic w ill no t have m u s t change th e ir w ays o r

find th e m se lv e s unem ployed , "T he pub lic h a s b eco m e convinced , " s ta te d

S u n d erlan d , " th a t th e re i s g ro s s in effic ien cy in the a d m in is tra tio n of the

law . . . . T h e re is too m u ch de lay , ex p en se and u n c e r ta in ty abou t i t ,

Sunderland , too p ro p o se d th a t an o b jec tiv e of p r a c t ic a l le g a l

ed u ca tio n be the im p ro v e m e n t of the a d m in is tra tio n of the law . C e r ta in ly ,

n o t a l l th e im p ro v e m en ts th u s ca lled fo r can be c la im e d a s be ing rh e to ­

r ic a l in n a tu re , bu t th e s p e a k e rs a t no tim e a tte m p te d to d isc r im in a te

th e rh e to r ic a l f ro m th e n o n - rh e to r ic a l r e fo rm s sought. The only co n c lu ­

s io n s th a t m ay be d raw n f ro m th is evidence a r e th e se : the le g a l sy s te m

i s , am ong o th e r th ings an o rg an iza tio n fo r co m m u n ica tio n . The p ro c e s s

of co m m u n ica tio n flow s f ro m the counsel to the c o u r t (judge o r ju ry ) and

f ro m w itn e sse s to the c o u r t th rough co u n se l, and f ro m p re c e d e n t d e c is io n s

and a u th o r ity th rough the la w y e rs to the c o u r t . If th e re i s c r i t ic is m of

the e n t i re p ro c e s s of a d m in is tra t io n of th e law , then education fo r the

c o r r e c t io n of the tro u b le m u s t in som e w ay be d ire c te d a t the co m m u n i­

c a tio n p ro c e s s . To th e e x te n t, th en , th a t law schoo l le a d e rs s e t a s a

goal of p r a c t ic a l edu ca tio n the in c re a s in g e ffic ien cy of the a d m in is tra tio n

of ju s t ic e , to th a t ex ten t th ey p ro p o sed , a t le a s t p a r t ia l ly , a rh e to r ic a l

o b je c tiv e .

6 l lb id . , pp. 4 8 -4 9 .

124

A second m a jo r o b jec tiv e of p r a c t ic a l le g a l education p ro p o se d by

th e law schoo ls w as the p ro te c tio n and c o n tro l of the ju ry sy s te m . The

n eed fo r the ex ten s iv e c o n tro l of w hat can be a d m itted in ev idence and

sa id by co u n se l co m es f ro m th e pow er given to th e ju ry in le g a l d e c is io n ­

m ak in g . The a ssu m p tio n m ad e c o n c e rn s th e re la t iv e c a p a b ili t ie s and

p o w e rs of the t r i a l judge an d the ju ry . A s the ju ry is g iven in c re a s e d

p o w e r, w ithout any co m m e n su ra te in c re a s e in know ledge o r c a p a b ility ,

i t i s n e c e s s a ry to add m o re and m o re c o n tro ls to the ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s to

a s s u r e th a t the ju r y 's d e c is io n is guided a s m u ch a s p o ss ib le to w ard a

sound b a s is . T h e re fo re , t r i a l p ro c e d u re a c ts a s a type of m o n ito r o v e r

the com m unica tion b e tw een co u n se l, w itn e s s e s , a u th o r it ie s , and the

c o u r t , includ ing the in s tru c t io n s f ro m the ju d g e to the ju ry . I t i s th u s

a s su m e d th a t if the ju ry re c e iv e s only sound co m m u n ica tio n s i t s d e c is io n

m u s t n e c e s s a r i ly r e s t on m o re sound r e a s o n s ,

R oscoe P ound of the H a rv a rd Law School u se d th is lin e of r e a ­

soning to a rg u e a g a in s t e m p h a s is upon te ac h in g p ro c e d u re - -h e lo o k ed

fo rw a rd to the tim e w hen the pow er of the ju ry w ill d im in ish and th u s

th e n eed fo r the e la b o ra te c o n tro ls w ill do lik e w ise . The re a so n A m e ric a n

law sch o o ls h ad n eg lec ted t r i a l p ra c t ic e . P o u n d sa id , w as h is to r ic a l in

th a t m o s t of i t s p r in c ip le s h a d b ecom e com m on to A m e rica n L aw éifter

th e e s ta b lish m e n t of the law sch o o ls , "We m u s t r e m e m b e r , " he sa id .

125

" th a t o u r A m e ric a n law re a lly b eg in s a t the R e v o lu tio n -- in fa c t, n o t u n til

som e tim e a f te r , " C om m on law , he r e c a l le d , w as adopted q u ite la te

in A m e ric a n h is to r y . P ound continued;

E v id en ce w as d ev elo p ed in the f i r s t q u a r te r of the n in e teen th c e n tu ry p r e t ty th o ro u g h ly . B u t t r i a l p ra c t ic e , , , w as developed in the U nited S ta te s a f te r 1850, I t re a c h e d i ts z en ith abou t 1875; i t b egan to d ec lin e abou t 1900, and I u n d e r ­tak e to say i t w ill b e s tead ily of l e s s im p o rta n c e in the d ev e lo p m en t of o u r law in th e fu tu re . Now, why i s th a t? I t i s b ecau se we m ad e the g re a t m is ta k e in m o s t of o u r ju r is d ic t io n s of tak ing aw ay fro m the t r i a l judge h is com m on law p o w e rs . C onsequen tly , a l l th is tech n iq u e of in s tru c tio n of ju r i e s b ecam e of v e ry g r e a t im p o rta n c e - -m o re so in som e s ta te s than in o th e rs . Then

r f ro m 1851 on w e took aw ay the independence of the ju d g es . We m ad e th em e le c tiv e p ra c t ic a l ly a l l o v e r the co u n try . W h ereas a judge w as f o rm e r ly the c e n te r of the c o u r t ro o m , now c o u n se l b e c am e the a l l im p o rta n t f a c to r in the t r i a l and the judge b e c a m e a s o r t of w ooden In d ian who s a t up th e r e d ig n ified , b u t of v e ry l i t t le p r a c t ic a l co n seq u en ce .

T h e re w as w h e re th is su b jec t of t r i a l p ra c t ic e began , , , ,A ll [ o f t h i s ] • . • developed b e c a u se we h ad tu rn e d ju r ie s lo o se by cu ttin g off the com m on law p o w e rs of the t r i a l judge and we h ad to d e v ise som e m e a n s of ge ttin g aw ay f ro m the v e rd ic t w hich r e s u l te d u n d er such c irc u m s ta n c e s . So we d e v e ­loped a ll th is m in u tia of t r i a l p r a c t ic e w hich h a s a ssu m e d a tre m e n d o u s im p o rta n c e in the b o o k s ,

P o u n d ’s co n c lu sio n w as th a t p ro c e d u re should b e tau g h t, b u t h e f e l t i t

p o s s ib le to o v e re m p h a s iz e t r i a l p r a c t ic e , and , he con tinued , . if

we a r e p a tie n t we m a y find th a t we can g e t a long in an o th e r decad e p re t ty

w ell in the p a th s in w hich we h ave b e e n going, He m ean t th a t he

62R oscoe P o u n d , "D isc u ss io n of the S underland S p e e c h ," P r o ­c eed in g s of the T h ir te e n th , op, c i t , , p p , 7 -8 ,

63ibid ,, pp, 8 -9 , ^"^Ibid,, p, 9,

126

fa v o red giving in c re a s in g d is c re tio n to the judge and thus avo id the

n e c e s s ity to te a c h t r i a l p ra c t ic e in tlie law school. Speaking a y e a r

b e fo re , E d w ard W, H inton had tak en an opposing v iew . He reco g n ized

th a t som e of the p ro fe s s o r s r e je c te d the id ea of teach in g p ra c t ic e and

p ro c e d u re b e c a u se i t w as thought to be soon o b so le te , o r a t le a s t becom ing

th a t w ay. He n o ted th a t som e of h is co lleag u es b e lie v e d " . . . th a t when

we ge t done re fo rm in g i t [ t r i a l p r a c t ic e and p ro c e d u re ] , and to the

id e a l s im p lif ic a tio n of i t , th e re w ill be nothing le f t to te a c h . H inton

re je c te d th is p o s itio n w hich w as l a t e r to be defended by Hound: " P e r s o n ­

a lly , I do not b e lie v e th a t we w ill a r r iv e a t th a t cond ition fo r som e y e a rs

to com e, " H is re a s o n s fo r say ing so w e re th e se : "So long a s w e have

the com m on law ju ry we w ill h av e so m e d ifficu lty in w ork ing w ith th a t

ju ry , and we w ill have need fo r m o re o r le s s law of p ro c e d u re , and the

su c c e ss fu l p r a c t i t io n e r m u s t u n d e rs ta n d th a t b ra n c h of the law .

S u n d erlan d spoke a t g r e a te r len g th on the su b jec t. He w as con­

c e rn e d th a t t r i a l p r a c t ic e , w hich he b e lie v e d to be the end and e sse n c e

of p ro c e d u re , w as la rg e ly ig n o re d b y law schoo ls . "T he t r i a l , " he

sa id , " is the h e a r t of p ro c e d u re . " H is a rg u m e n t w as th is ,

A g lan ce a t the function of th e ju ry in the m o d e rn t r i a l a t law w ill m ak e the po in t c le a r . I t i s the ju ry w hich i s the c h a r a c te r is t ic fe a tu re of the t r i a l , co lo rin g a l l i ts p h a se s and

^^H inton , lo c . c it . ^^Ib id .

6 ?E dson R . S underland , "T each in g P r a c t ic e , " o£. c i t . , p . 54.

127

d e te rm in in g m o s t of i t s ru le s . T h is i s the in s titu tio n w hich h a s m ade com m on law p ro c e d u re w hat i t i s . T h e re i s s c a rc e ly any th ing ab o u t the t r i a l , f ro m the p lead in g s to the w r i t of e r r o r , w hich does not r e f le c t th e in fluence of th is unique fe a tu re of E n g lish and A m e ric a n le g a l developm ent.

To e la b o ra te , S u n d erlan d sa id th a t the p u rp o se of p lead in g s w as to p r o ­

duce is s u e s t r ia b le to a ju ry ; a m a jo r p o r tio n of the f i r s t p a r t of the

t r i a l i s devoted to the se le c tio n of the ju ry ; the w ay in w hich the law y e rs

handle th e m se lv e s and p re s e n t th e ir c a s e s f ro m opening s ta te m e n t to

f in a l a rg u m e n t is re g u la te d b ecause of the p re s e n c e of a ju ry ; the p r o ­

b le m of in s tru c tio n s to the ju ry r e s t s upon the ju ry ; and , he concluded ,

, , , sp e c ia l in te r ro g a to r ie s and sp e c ia l v e rd ic ts a r e m e re ly d ev ices fo r p e n e tra tin g in to the co n sc ie n c e of the ju ry ; new t r i a l s , w ith th e ir v a s tly co m p lica ted r u le s , w ere d ev ise d and a re g ra n ted a s a sa feg u ard a g a in s t p e rv e r s e v e rd ic ts of ju r ie s ; the v e rd ic t i s the f in a l d e c is io n of th e ju ry and i t f ix e s the c h a ra c te r of the judgm ent; and the w r i t of e r r o r i s sued ou t o r the a p p ea l i s tak en in m o s t c a s e s b ecau se the ap p e llan t b e lie v e s he can conv ince the c o u r t th a t som e e r r o r w as c o m ­m itte d in the p re s e n c e of the ju ry w hich p re ju d ic ia lly in flu en ced i ts v e rd ic t , and he p ra y s fo r a r e v e r s a l and an o th e r t r i a l b e fo re a n o th e r ju ry , ^8

The second o b jec tiv e of p r a c t ic a l c o u rs e s in law sch o o ls , then ,

h a s b ee n co n cern ed w ith the ro le of the ju r y in le g a l d ec is io n -m a k in g .

The r u le s w hich a r e to be taugh t and p e r fe c te d , a r e d esig n ed to co n tro l

the co m m u n ica tio n s re c e iv e d and the n a tu re of the p e rsu a s io n w hich

ta k e s p lace in the m in d of the ju ry . O bv iously , the ru le s th e m se lv e s

^ ^ Ib id ,, pp , 54 -5 5 ,

128

a r e c o n s tru c te d and tau g h t on the a ssu m p tio n th a t th o se who m ake and

te a c h th em know w hat e ffe c t c e r ta in m e s s a g e s have on the m in d s of th e

ju r o r s . A lso , th e re i s a s tro n g sug g estio n by som e of the s p e a k e rs ,

th a t know ledge of the u se of the p r a c t ic e s and p ro c e d u re s w ill p e rm it a

d e g re e of s e le c tiv ity on the p a r t of the law y er in c o u r t to the end th a t

he m ay in fluence the d e c is io n of the ju ry .

In any ev en t, in so f a r a s the ju ry i s a fo ca l p o in t of p ra c t ic a l

tra in in g in law sch o o ls such tra in in g m u s t n e c e s s a r i ly be c o n s id e re d a s

m uch r h e to r ic a l a s le g a l , if n o t m o re so. F o r in fa c t , th e se ru le s

re la te d to the ju ry a r e n o t co n ce rn ed w ith p r in c ip le s of law n o r w ith the

ap p lica tio n of law to th e end of so c ia l c o n tro l, r a th e r they beg in and end

w ith an a tte m p t to c o n tro l the d ec is io n -m aJd n g p r o c e s s of a g roup of

le g a lly u n tra in e d p e r s o n s a s they re sp o n d to m e s s a g e s bo th p e rs u a s iv e

and , a lleg e d ly , in fo rm a tiv e . P o u n d ’s a rg u m e n t th a t a s the d e c is io n ­

m ak ing d is c re tio n of the ju ry i s d im in ish ed the n eed to study the t r i a l

sy s te m in law school w ill a lso d im in ish is p re d ic a te d upon the a s s u m p ­

tio n th a t the t r i a l ju d g e , be ing t ra in e d in law , d oes no t n eed to be

p ro te c te d a g a in s t p o s s ib ly p re ju d ic ia l co m m u n ica tio n s . T h is a rg u m e n t

is i t s e l f su b jec t to s e r io u s doubt.

The th ird o b jec tiv e of p r a c t ic a l ed ucation in law sch o o ls , a s

s ta te d by le g a l e d u c a to rs , i s in d iv id u a l su c c e ss in advocacy . I t i s th is

o b jec tiv e w hich s e e m s to be le a s t p o p u la r w ith the law school p r o f e s s o r s .

129

and i t i s th is o b jec tiv e th a t they m o s t fre q u e n tly a s s o c ia te w ith rh e to r ic .

The m o s t com m on r e a s o n g iven fo r d e -e m p h a s iz in g s u c c e ss in advocacy

a t th is t im e w as a fee lin g th a t i t should be tau g h t e ls e w h e re . T h is im ­

p lie d th a t th e r e p re s e n ta t iv e s of the law sch o o ls re c o g n iz e d the d e s ir a b i l i ty

of a young la w y e r le a rn in g the p r in c ip le s of ad v o cacy , b u t th ey s im p ly

f e l t th a t i t could b e t te r be tau g h t e i th e r b e fo re o r a f te r law sch o o l. How­

e v e r , th is r e a s o n does n o t fu lly ex p la in the a ttitu d e of the law sch o o ls

to w ard th is o b jec tiv e of p r a c t ic a l education . A fu r th e r b a s is of re je c tio n

a p p e a r s , m o re by im p lic a tio n th an d ir e c t s ta te m e n t- - th e teach in g of

ad v o cacy i s no t a c a d e m ic a lly re s p e c ta b le . T h e re i s a v e ry s tro n g sug ­

g es tio n th a t the le a d e r s of th e law schoo ls a s s o c ia te d advocacy w ith

ta le n ts and k n ac k s , the h ig h -so u n d in g p h r a s e s and em pty o ra to ry w hich

C h ap te r I d is c u s s e d a s b e in g am ong the p o p u la r d e fin itio n s of rh e to r ic ,

S u n d erlan d , the lead in g exponen t of p ra c t ic a l law schoo l c o u r s e s , and a

re p re s e n ta t iv e of the sch o o l (M ichigan) m o s t open ly in fav o r of such

c o u r s e s , a tte m p ts to m ak e the d is tin c tio n in th is w ay.

The teach in g of t r i a l p r a c t ic e h a s s c a rc e ly b e en a tte m p te d in m o s t of the law sc h o o ls of th is c o u n try . A nd the re a so n p ro b a b ly l ie s in the f a i lu re to c le a r ly d is tin g u ish b e tw een t r i a l p r a c t ic e a s a body of w e ll-d e fin e d and a c c u ra te ly developed p r in c ip le s of p ro c e d u re and t r i a l p ra c t ic e a s a vague and shadow y d isc o u rs e on s u c c e s s in ad v o cacy . The law sch o o ls can n o t u n d e rtak e to te a c h m en how to r e a d c h a ra c te r ; how to cu ltiv a te an im p re s s iv e m a n n e r; how to sk illfu lly in te r ro g a te a w itn e ss ; how and w hen to ap p ea l to the em o tio n s of the ju ry ; how to d e lic a te ly f la t t e r o r s e v e re ly a r r a ig n . T hey canno t

130

te a c h re so u rc e fu ln e s s and ta c t . The a r t of e x p re s s io n and the sk ill of s tra te g y a r e o u ts id e the p ro p e r scope of the sc h o o ls of law . A ll of th e se th in g s a r e a s n e c e s s a ry in s e llin g goods o r teach ing schoo l a s in p ra c tic in g law . The a r t of advocacy is the a r t of l i fe , and only life can te a c h w hat l ife i s .

A lthough he im p lie s th a t h is only ob jec tio n is th a t advocacy m u st

b e tau g h t "by l i f e , " h is d e sc r ip tio n of p ra c t ic e a s "vague an d shadowy

d is c o u rs e on su c c e ss in a d v o c a c y ," s tro n g ly su g g ests an acad em ic con­

d em n a tio n of the p ro c e s s . T h is co n c lu sio n i s s tre n g th en ed when he

p ro c e e d s to co m p are th is w ith " , , . t r i a l p r a c t ic e , , , v iew ed a s the

k ey s to n e of a sy s te m a tic sch em e of p ro c e d u re , co n cern in g i ts e lf w ith

th e p r in c ip le s by w hich the p ro b le m s p e r ta in in g to the conduct of the t r i a l

a r e a n a ly ze d and solved, , , , " He d e s c r ib e s c o u rse s in th is to be

" , , . a c c u ra te , lo g ica l, and p ro fe s s io n a lly te c h n ic a l. They co n cern

. . . t h e v e r y e s s e n c e o f p r o c e d u r e , a n d C a r e 3 a s s o l i d l y i n t e l l e c t u a l70

a s any o th e r b ra n c h of the law . " S underland thus s tro n g ly su g g ests th a t

h e d o es n o t f e e l the study of adv o cacy to be in te lle c tu a lly so lid ,

E p a p h ro d itu s P e ck , a re p re s e n ta t iv e of Y ale L aw School w hich

w as one of the f i r s t schools to em p h a s iz e p r a c t ic a l law tra in in g , a ttem p ted

a s im i la r d is tin c tio n betw een the law of p ro c e d u re , c o v e rin g such sub­

j e c t s a s the ju r is d ic tio n of c o u r ts , the m ode of obtain ing ju r is d ic tio n o v er

th e p e r s o n by s e rv ic e , the m ode of ob tain ing p o s se s s io n of the p e rso n s ,

^9ibid,, pp , 5 5 - 5 6 , ^ Ibid., p , 56 .

131

o r p ro p e r ty by a r r e s t o r by a tta ch m en t, e tc , , and the study of t r i a l

p r a c t ic e . Of th is he s a id , " It seem s to m e th a t th e re is a group of

su b je c ts th e re C those ju s t m en tio n ed ] th a t c o v e r w hat one m ay c a ll

th e com m on law of ju d ic ia l p ro c e d u re , " Of t r i a l p ra c tic e he sa id , "It

s e e m s to m e th a t the te a c h in g of t r i a l p r a c t ic e p r e t ty n e a r ly am o u n ts to

teach in g the a r t of ad v o cacy , w hich P r o f e s s o r S underland sa id cannot

be tau g h t, A s f a r a s the teach ing of ad v o cacy w as co n cern ed . P r o ­

f e s s o r P e c k noted th a t in the ten or e lev en y e a r s he had b een in co m p le te

c h a rg e of the p ro c e d u re c o u rs e s a t Y ale he h a d n e v e r b een ab le " , , ,

to conduct p ra c tic e c o u r ts w ith anything lik e the d eg ree of su c c e ss and

of u se fu ln e s s th a t se e m s to have Bsuen found in som e o th e r sch o o ls ,

The tes tim o n y so f a r p re se n te d su g g e s ts th a t advocacy m ay be an

o b jec tiv e of p ra c t ic a l c o u r s e s in law schoo l, b u t th a t the p r o fe s s o r s of

law r e je c t i t a s a le g itim a te o b jec tiv e . T h is i s n o t u n iv e rsa lly the

c a s e - -d u r in g the sam e tim e o th e r r e p re s e n ta t iv e s of law sch o o ls w ent

on r e c o rd a s fav o rin g the teach in g of ad v o cacy , W alte r C, C lephane of

G eorge W ashington U n iv e rs ity Law School spoke out in opposition to the

S underland ph ilosophy . He s ta te d th a t he con d u c ted h is t r i a l p r a c t ic e

c la s s e s in a way to a p p ro x im a te w hat a c tu a lly h ap p en s in a c o u r t a s

n e a r ly a s p o ss ib le . He a g re e d th a t i t w as im p o rta n t to le a rn to fo llow

^^E paphrod itu s P e c k , "D iscu ssio n of the S underland S peech , " P ro c e e d in g s of the T h ir te e n th , op, c i t , , p , 11,

72lbid,

132

the ru le s of p ro ced u re# b u t he w as a lso anx ious to te a c h the s tu d en ts

the b e s t m e th o d s of ap p ro ach in g the ju ry , the w itn e s s (including c r o s s -

exam ination ) and the s tra te g y of t r i a l . He e m p h a s iz e d th a t follow ing

e v e ry p ra c t ic e t r i a l tim e i s tak en fo r the p r o fe s s o r to c r i t ic iz e the

p e rfo rm a n c e of the s tu d e n ts , te llin g them w hat th ey did w ell, and w hat

they should change o r o m it, He m ade i t c le a r th a t he w as speak ing

of som eth ing o th e r than in s tru c t io n in le g a l p r in c ip le s .

Of c o u r s e , w e have o u r r e g u la r co u rse on e v id en ce , and o u r c o u rse on p lead in g , and o u r co u rse on p r a c t ic e and our c o u rse on c r im in a l p ro c e d u re , and on le g a l e th ic s , in w hich th eo ­r e t ic a l in s tru c tio n i s g iven in the c la s s ro o m ; b u t when it co m es to the c o u rt ro o m i t i s a l l done in e x a c t acco rd an ce w ith the a c tu a l ru le s of p r a c t ic e ,

I th in k th is p r a c t ic e c o u rse i s m o s t v a lu a b le , I know o u r own u n iv e rs ity i s d e lig h ted w ith i t , fo r i t h a s w o rk ed w ell,

F ro m th is s ta te m e n t i t can re a d ily be concluded th a t C lephane a im ed a t

teach in g som eth ing m o re th an the p r in c ip le s of la w --h e w as anx ious to

he lp the s tu d en ts le a r n the m o s t e ffec tiv e way to u se the p r in c ip le s to

a cc o m p lish th e ir o b jec tiv e in c o u rt. T h is cou ld b e d e sc rib e d a s teach in g

su c c e ss in advocacy (w ithout n eg a tiv e ly toned lan g u ag e), O liv er A,

H a rk e r of the U n iv e rs ity of I llin o is C ollege of L aw re f le c te d a s im ila r

ph ilo sophy w hen he sa id , " I fe e l , , , so f a r a s th is [ p ro c ed u re ]

^^W alte r C, C lephane , "D iscu ss io n of th e S underland S p e e c h ," P ro c e e d in g s of the T h ir te e n th , op, c i t . , p . 13,

74lb id .

133

b ra n c h is co n c e rn e d , th a t the p re p a ra t io n of the s tu d en t is in ad eq u ate

if i t g o es no fu r th e r th an th e a c q u ire m e n t of a know ledge of the ru le s

by w hich p ro c e d u re is g o v ern ed and the h is to r ic a l d ev e lo p m en t of p r o -

c e d u re . " W hile he re c o g n iz e d th a t th e law sch o o l canno t tu rn out a

f in ish e d p ro d u c t, he sa id . . the law school can fu rn is h such tra in in g

th a t w ill enab le a s tu d en t to m ake th e p ro p e r s e le c tio n of th e to o ls th a t

a r e a p p ro p r ia te to the m a t te r in h and , and to m ak e in te ll ig e n t use of

7 Ath e m . " The p la c e to do th is type of te a c h in g , H a rk e r sa id , w as in

the m o o t o r p ra c t ic e c o u r t p ro v id e d i t w as co n d u c ted w ith the sam e

c a r e and p re p a ra t io n a s w as given to a l l the o th e r c o u r s e s .

T h u s , a su b s ta n tia l co n flic t of p h ilo so p h ie s d ev e lo p s o v er the

te a ch in g of ad v o cacy . T h e re i s v i r tu a l a g re e m e n t (som e re lu c ta n t) th a t

e ffec tiv e advocacy i s an o b jec tiv e of le g a l ed u c a tio n , b u t a f te r th a t,

th e re i s co n flic t o v e r w h e th e r ad v o cacy can be tau g h t in sc h o o ls , w h e th e r

ad v o cacy i s a c a d e m ic a lly re sp e c ta b le enough to be tau g h t in sch o o ls ,

and w h e th e r advocacy should n o t be tau g h t in sch o o ls o th e r than law

sc h o o ls . W ith r e g a rd to th is o b je c tiv e , h o w e v e r, th e r e i s no q u es tio n

ab o u t i t be ing a rh e to r ic a l o b jec tiv e a s opposed to a s t r ic t ly leg a l

o b je c tiv e .

75 O liv e r A . H a rk e r , "D isc u ss io n of the H a s tin g s S p e e c h ," P r o ­c ee d in g s of the T w elfth , op. c i t . , p . 20.

76ibid.

134

To th e se th re e b ro a d o b je c tiv e s of p r a c t ic a l law schoo l education

m u s t be ad d ed th o se o b jec tiv es w hich have no a p p a re n t r e la t io n to the

study of r h e to r ic . T h a t is to sa y , the suggestion m u s t no t be le f t th a t

a l l of the p r a c t ic a l o b je c tiv e s c an e a s ily be r e la te d to rh e to r ic a l th e o ry ,

A g re a t p o r tio n of the p r a c t ic a l law school c u rr ic u lu m h a s b ee n re g u la r ly

a im e d a t the tra in in g of law s tu d e n ts to p e r fo rm the v a r io u s ta s k s of

la w y e rs su ch a s re sp o n d in g to a sum m o n s, se a rc h in g a d eed , and so

fo r th .

H o w ev er, once the r h e to r ic a l o b jec tiv es of p r a c t ic a l law school

tra in in g h av e b e en d is c u s s e d , a f u r th e r avenue of in q u iry l ie s in the

in v e s tig a tio n of the w ays in w hich th e se educational id e a ls have been

t r a n s la te d in to sp ec ific c o u r s e s .

C onten t of p r a c t ic a l c o u rse s

T he d isc u s s io n of th e co n te n t of the p ra c t ic a l law schoo l c o u rs e s

w ill be d iv id ed in to two p a r t s ; f i r s t , the p ro fe sso rW id e a ls of w hat

should be in c lu d ed in the c o u r s e s w ill be exam ined , and second , som e

re p re s e n ta t iv e sc h o o ls ’ a c tu a l p r a c t ic e s w ill be d is c u s s e d .

T he id e a l p r a c t ic a l c o u r s e , - -A s suggested in the s ta te m e n t of

o b je c tiv e s , the d iffe re n c e s of op in ion am ong the law schoo l r e p r e s e n ­

ta t iv e s w ith r e g a rd to co n ten t of p ra c t ic a l c o u rse s ra n g e s a ll the way

fro m the m in im u m in s tru c tio n in s tr ic t ly le g a l p ro c e d u re s to the

135

co m p le te d u p lica tio n of th e p re p a ra t io n and t r i a l of c a s e s . R e p re se n tin g

the fo rm e r end of the con tinuum , W illiam P . R o g e rs of the U n iv e rs ity

of C incinnati L aw Schools sa id , "I th ink the sch o o ls should r e q u ire th a t -

s tu d en ts who a r e going in to p r a c t ic e should know how to d raw a l l n e c e s ­

s a ry p a p e r s and p le a d in g s , should know the m ean in g of a d e m u r re r , and

77should know w hen and how to maJce n e c e s s a ry m o tio n s and am en d m en ts ,"

R o g e rs w as in doubt w h e th e r the c o u rs e s should go fu r th e r . He u s e d a

com m on a rg u m e n t, su g g estin g th a t if the sch o o ls could no t p r e p a re an

e x p e r t p ra c t i t io n e r th en they should no t a tte m p t th e p re p a ra tio n a t a l l

beyond w hat he h ad su g g ested . He a sk ed if any of the o th e r law schoo l

re p re s e n ta t iv e s could te l l h im why they d id n o t ap p ro v e of a r ic h e r

p r a c t ic a l c o u rse so th a t " , , , we can give to s tu d e n ts who a sk u s why

they sh a ll not h av e m o re c o u r t p ra c t ic e in th e i r c o u r s e , a re a so n w hich

w ill b e s a tis fa c to ry to th e m , '^^W illiam E , H igg ins of the U n iv e rs ity of

K an sas School of Law re p re s e n te d the o th e r end of the con tinuum , H ig ­

g ins c la im ed p r a c t ic a l le g a l esqperience fo r h im s e lf , and p ro c e e d e d to

give a fu ll a n a ly s is of w hat should b e in c lu d ed in the p ra c t ic a l c o u r s e .

F ro m m y e :q )e rien ce in th e se c o u r ts th e r e a re th re e th in g s w hich we ought to te a c h by p ra c t ic e c o u r ts : F i r s t , w here to fin d the law ; and , second , how to find it; an d th ird , how to

77 W illiam P , R o g e rs , "D isc u ss io n of th e H astin g s S peech , " P r o ­ceed in g s of the T w elfth , op, c i t , ,. p , 23,

'^®Ibid.

136

p re p a re and p re s e n t i t . F o llow ing th ese th e r e a r e a lso th re e th ings th a t a young m an shou ld le a rn a s the fu n d am en ta ls of p r a c t ic e , and , by the v a y , one does no t have to c o v e r the d e ta ils of p ra c t ic e in the d if fe re n t s ta te s e i th e r . One can take h is own p ra c t ic e and te a c h i t fu n d am en ta lly a f te r the f i r s t o r F re s h m a n y e a r . N ow , th e se , in m y op in ion , a r e the fu n d am en ta ls : f i r s t , w hat i s a conclusion of law , and how to re co g n iz e it; second , w hat i s an u ltim a te o r o p e ra tiv e fa c t, and how to reco g n ize it; th i rd , w hat i s the ev id en ce to su s ta in such a fa c t . B r ie f ly , in th o se th re e fu n d am en ta ls is the id e a l w hich we a im to give in the p ra c t ic e c o u rts of o u r law school.I do .no t b e lie v e in le c tu r e s a lo n e , and I do n o t b e liev e in c o u r ts of p ra c t ic e m e re ly a s a c o u rse e ith e r f ro m the te x t­book, if we should have o n e , o r f ro m the c a se -b o o k ; I do not b e liev e th ey alone w ill b e s u c c e ss fu l. You m u s t have a d v e r ­s a ry p ro c e e d in g s .

E d w ard W. H inton f e l t th a t th e re w ere c e r ta in th in g s to be

ob tained in the p r a c t ic e c o u r t w hich the s tuden t cou ld no t le a r n e l s e ­

w h ere . T h is w as , in H inton’s op in ion , the e x p e rie n c e w ith the raw

m a te r ia l of a c a s e . A s he p u t i t , " . . . the ta le of woe such a s a c lie n t

b r in g s in to th e o ffice , w hich i s qu ite a d iffe ren t th ing f ro m the re c o rd

AOth a t we find in the r e p o r ts . " The s tuden t, he f e l t , n eed ed and could

get e x p e rie n c e in dealing w ith th e s to ry of the c l ie n t , " . . . in dealing

w ith the raw f a c ts , in m ak ing up h is m ind as to th e r e a l fa c ts of the

c a s e , and apply ing the p ro p e r le g a l a n a ly s is to w h at you m ig h t c a ll the

81o p e ra tiv e f a c ts . " In the p r a c t ic e w ork , H inton b e lie v e d , the s tuden t

^9W illiam E . H igg ins, "D isc u ss io n of the H a s tin g s S p e e c h ," P r o ­ceed in g s of the T w elfth , op. c i t . , p . 25.

®®Hinton, 0£ . c i t . , p . 18. ^^Ib id . , pp . 18-19.

137

could become im p ressed ", . . with the necessity»’ not m e re ly of stating

a cause of action, but of stating h is cause of action, because in the

p rac tice court he will run into difficulties of pleading a situation which

h is proof does not support. " F inally , Hinton sought to provide in the

p rac tice course an opportunity fo r the student to gain ", . . p rac tica l

e3q>erience in form ulating the charge o r in struction to the t r i e r s of

fact; in seeing the necessity for conform ing the questions subm itted . , ,

to the issu es made by the pleadings, , , ,

C harles M, Hepburn of Indiana U niversity School of Law added

the thought ", , , that a p rac tice court should look m ore to the scientific

b as is of pleading than to a m ere copying of co rre c t fo rm s.

Jam es B, Brooks of Syracuse U niversity College of Law

attem pted to state the case fo r those who have le ss reg a rd fo r the value

of p rac tice co u rses. He fe lt that too m uch attention can be given to

studying the t r ia l of questions of fac t, fo r he said ", , , only a sm all

percentage of the law yers ever try questions of fac t to any g rea t extent,

He went on to state what he would include in the p rac tice co u rse ,

8 2 lb id ., p , 19,

®^Charles M, Hepburn, "D iscussion of the H astings Speech," P ro ­ceedings of the Twelfth, op, c it. -, p . 27.

®^James B. B rooks, "D iscussion of the H astings Speech ," P r o ­ceedings of the Twelfth, op, c it, , p , 30,

138

I do n o t c o n s id e r th a t m y s tu d en ts a r e be ing tra in e d to go in to c o u r t and t r y c a s e s b e fo re a ju ry sp e c ia lly . B u t w hât I r o s e to say is th is : The m o o t c o u r t w hich p r e s e n ts q u estio n s of law , p u ts the s tu d en t on h is m e tt le to find the law and the a u th o r i t ie s , and d e te rm in e s the fo rm of ac tio n a s a ru le .T h is a ls o g iv es the in s t r u c to r an o p p o rtu n ity of tra in in g the s tu d e n t in the th in g s th a t he ought to b e tra in e d in , such a s h is a d d re s s to the c o u r t, h is a ttitu d e and h is language b e fo re the c o u rt; the lo g ica l a r ra n g e m e n t of h is p o in ts in h is b r ie f ; the p ro p e r c itin g of a u th o r it ie s ; th e back ing of h is p a p e r s , an d a l l the l i t t le d e ta ils so n eed fu l to be know n. The young m en a r e g ra te fu l fo r th is k ind of t ra in in g w hich th ey g e t only in a c o u r t th a t is o rg a n ize d fo r p re se n tin g and d isc u ss in g q u e s tio n s of law .

1 h ave an abiding fa ith th a t if a m an i s m ade fo r a la w y e r , he w ill h ave no s e r io u s d ifficu lty w ith the p ra c t ic e if he know s the law . So I w ould cu t out a l l th is ro u tin e of try in g to fash io n a m o ck c o u r t fo r the t r i a l of q u e s tio n s of fa c t.

T h e se co m m en ts r e p re s e n t the m a jo r g ra d a tio n s along the co n ­

tinuum of in c lu s io n of con ten t in the p r a c t ic a l c o u rse w o rk . F ro m

th e se s ta te m e n ts of id e a l c o u rse c o n te n t ,ia g e n e ra l p ic tu re of the

a ttitu d e to w a rd a r h e to r ic a l o r ie n ta tio n in p ra c t ic e c o u r s e s can be

d raw n . The n ex t s tep is to exam ine som e sp ec ific p r a c t ic a l c o u r s e s to

see how th ey w e re s e t up and ru n .

T he conduct of re p re s e n ta t iv e p r a c t ic e c o u r s e s . - -T h e n a tu re of

m o o t c o u r t and law club w o rk in the e a r ly sch o o ls h a s b een d e s c r ib e d in

C h ap te r II . Som e co n c lu sio n s can be d raw n co n cern in g the d ev e lo p m en t

of le g a l rh e to r ic by co m p arin g th e se p r a c t ic e s w ith th o se of the law

sch o o ls of abou t 100 y e a r s la te r .

^ ^ Ib id . , pp . 30-31 .

139

The U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan Law School, las h a s b een no ted

b e fo re , ran k ed a s the le a d e r am ong law sch o o ls in p ro v id in g a p ra c t ic a l

c u r r ic u lu m . Both in the c u r r ic u lu m and in the v o lu n ta ry s o c ie tie s

im p ro v e m en t in speak ing an d debating w as an ob jec tiv e of law school

w o rk . F ro m the tim e the school w as opened in 1859 u n til the e a r ly p a r t

of the 20th C en tu ry , l i t e r a r y so c ie tie s w e re ac tiv e am ong law s tu d en ts .

B row n , in h e r h is to ry of the school, r e f e r s to an 1894 c la s s annual

w hich su g g es ts the p u rp o se of the s o c ie tie s to be the c u ltiv a tio n of f o r ­

e n s ic e loquence , and to fa n ", , , the dying e m b e rs of the w e ll nigh lo s t

a r t of speech m ak ing , B row n n o tes v a r io u s l i t e r a r y and debating

s o c ie tie s in o p e ra tio n a s la te a s 1919-1920, W hile the e a r l i e r d e s c r ip ­

tio n s of th e se s o c ie tie s h a d s ta ted th e ir p u rp o se a s the d ev e lo p m en t of

l i t e r a r y c u ltu re , in 1911-1912 the d e s c r ip tio n w as changed to the

R7se c u rin g of tra in in g in p u b lic speak ing an d debating . L a te r , B row n

r e f e r s to a m im eo g ra p h e d p am p h le t e n tit le d "C ase Club C om petition"

w hich w as a p p a re n tly d is tr ib u te d to the s tu d en ts in 1938-1939, The

f i r s t p a r t .o f the p am p h le t g ives th is d e s c r ip tio n of the c a s e club a c tiv ity

and h is to ry .

A s the C ase Club e n te r s upon i t s s ix teen th y e a r of a c tiv ity i t m ig h t be w e ll to p a u se and c o n s id e r i t s h is to ry , , , The f i r s t r e c o rd s a v a ila b le a re fo r the y e a r s 1923 and 1924, A t

^^To W it (U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan School of L aw , 1894) c ited in B row n , o£, c i t , , p , 230,

87B row n, o£, c i t , , p , 231,

140

th a t tim e P a u l L e id y w as the se n io r a d v is e r fo r the Cooley C lub , w hich a p p e a rs to have b ee n the only club in ex is te n c e , an d hence the n u c leu s a ro u n d w hich the p re s e n t co m p etitio n h as b e e n b u ilt , . . . T he c a s e s , d u rin g the f i r s t few y e a r s , w ere a rg u e d b e fo re j u r i e s of s tu d en ts ; the q u es tio n s of fa c t being a rg u e d , a s w ell a s q u e s tio n s of law . . . . In the C ooley Club th e re w ere s ix te en m e m b e r s - - a s co m p ared w ith the 330 m e m ­b e r s of the five f i r s t - y e a r and fo u r s e c o n d -y e a r c lu b s today [ 1 9 3 8 ] . In 1924 the m e m b e rsh ip in c re a s e d to tw e n ty -fo u r.A nd in 1925 the c a se club s y s te m , a s i t e x is ts to d ay , w as f o r ­m a l ly o rg an ized by P r o f e s s o r s H o lb ro o k , S taso n , and D urfee ,In th a t y e a r the M a rs h a ll , K en t, S to ry , and H o lm es C lubs w ere o rg a n ize d ,

T he sam e p am p h le t m ad e r e fe re n c e to a s ta te m e n t w hich gave the p u r ­

p o se of the c lubs a s be in g an e x t r a c u r r ic u la r o p p o rtu n ity fo r the

p re p a ra t io n and a rg u m e n t of law c a s e s . B y 1933 th e facu lty reco g n ized

the v a lu e of the c lu b s by ex cu sin g s e n io r s tu d en ts f ro m the p o rtio n s of

the p r a c t ic e c o u r t r e q u ire d of s e n io rs w hich had to do w ith the p r e p a r ­

a tio n of b r ie f s and o r a l a rg u m en t,® ^ A nd, by 1940-41 , " , , , C ase

C lubs w e re a re co g n iz ed though v o lu n ta ry p a r t of the L aw School’s

p ro g ra m of tra in in g fo r ad v o cacy . S tudent p a r t ic ip a tio n had continued

90to show a stead y in c r e a s e ,"

B efo re ending the d isc u s s io n of the teach in g of p ra c tic e a t the

U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan School of L aw , the id e a s of E d so n R , S underland

once ag a in need to b e ex am in ed . H is sp eech b e fo re th e A sso c ia tio n of

A m e r ic a n L aw Schools in 1913 w as re m a rk a b le fo r a t le a s t one r e a s o n - -

Q Q

"C ase Club C om p etitio n " (U n iv e rs ity of M ich igan School of L aw , 1938-1939), c i te d in B ro w n , og, c i t , , p , 240,

® ^Ibid,, p , 243, ^°Ib id ,

141

he p ro p o se d a m eth o d of teach in g t r i a l p r a c t ic e w h ich , though r id ic u le d

by h is c o lle a g u e s a t the t im e , ev en tu a lly p ro v e d to be the m o s t m o d e rn

in co n cep tio n of a l l m e th o d s . "To p ro d u ce a la w -sc h o o l t r i a l w hich

sh a ll s e rv e a u se fu l e d u c a tio n a l p u rp o se , " he to ld the m e m b e rs of the

A . A , L . S . , " th e re m u s t b e two th ings;

f i r s t , a u se fu l s e t of f a c ts m u s t be developed analogous to the fa c ts in a l i t ig a te d c o n tro v e rs y , and , seco n d , th e re m u s t b e a th o ro u g h and te c h n ic a l p re p a ra t io n of those fa c ts in a ll th e i r le g a l p o s s ib i l i t ie s , b y s tu d en ts r e p re s e n tin g both s id es of the c o n tro v e rsy .

H is p ro p o se d m ethod of a c c o m p lish in g the f i r s t o b jec tiv e w as to a s s ig n

v a r io u s tra n s a c t io n s to d if fe re n t s tu d e n ts . E a ch of the s tu d en ts a s su m e d

the ro le of a p a r ty in the r e a l c o n tro v e rs y . If h is c h a ra c te r w ro te a

th re a te n in g l e t t e r to a n o th e r p a r t ic ip a n t, the s tu d en t w ro te such a

l e t t e r . If the c h a ra c te r m ad e a te lephone c a l l , o r h ad a c o n v e rsa tio n ,

o r s ig n ed a c o n tra c t , o r b o rro w e d m oney , e t c . , th e n the s tu d en t d id

the sa m e . Once the s tu d e n t-a c to r h ad p e r fo rm e d h is a ss ig n e d d e e d s ,

i t w as a s m uch a p a r t of h is p a s t ex p e rie n c e a s if he h ad b e e n the o r ig in a l

p a r ty in the c o n tro v e rsy . T h u s , w hen p u t on the w itn e ss s tan d to be

q u es tio n ed about h is a c tio n s , the s tu d en t cou ld te l l w hat he d id , saw ,

sa id , o r w h a tev e r i t w as ju s t a s a r e a l w itn e s s . E q u a lly , he cou ld be

S underland , "T ea ch in g P r a c t ic e , " P ro c e e d in g s of the Thirteenth^ op. c i t . , p . 58.

142

su b je c te d to c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n reg a rd in g h is r e p o r t of e x p e r ie n c e s ,

and r e a l d isc re p a n c ie s cou ld b e d isco v e re d .

T h is m ethod , c la im e d S u n derland , had the advan tage of r e a l i ty

and c o n s is te n c y o v er the com m on m ethod of giving a s tu d e n t-w itn e ss a

sh e e t of p a p e r saying w hat he know s re le v a n t to the t r i a l . It w as com m on

te s tim o n y th a t in the l a t t e r m e th o d , c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n w as v ir tu a lly

im p o ss ib le ; u n d er the S u n d erlan d m ethod , i t a t l e a s t a p p ro x im a te s the

r e a l e:q)erience«

W hile the m eth o d of the s tu d e n ts ' p re p a ra t io n u n d er the S u n d er­

lan d p la n i s e s se n tia lly the sam e a s th a t u se d in o th e r sch o o ls , the

s p e a k e r d id p re s e n t a p h ilo so p h y of handling the a c tu a l t r i a l w hich d if­

f e r e d f ro m the com m on p r a c t ic e . The t r i a l , he s a id , " , . . should no t

be looked upon a s a m e re im ita tio n of an ac tu a l la w su it. A s an im ita tio n

92i t am o u n ts to noth ing , " T he o b jec t, he c la im e d , w as n o t s im ply to

a llo w the s tu d en ts to go th ro u g h the m o tio n s of a t r i a l , b u t r a th e r to

in s t r u c t them ; to p e rm it th e m to le a rn the ap p lica tio n of the p r in c ip le s

they h ad le a rn e d in c la s s . "T o th a t end, " he co n tin u ed , "the in s tru c to r

who p re s id e s in the c o u r t shou ld n o t fo rg e t th a t he i s in s tru c tin g , n o t

im p e rso n a tin g a ju d g e . . . . He should c r i t ic iz e an d c o r r e c t f re e ly .

S u n d erlan d would have h is in s tru c to r - ju d g e in te r r u p t a t any tim e he fe l t

^^Ibid., p . 60, ^^Ibid., pp. 60-61.

143

a c o n tr ib u tio n to the le a rn in g p ro c e s s m ig h t be m ad e ; he a lso en co u rag ed

s e r io u s d is c u s s io n s a f te r th e t r i a l to co m m en t on good and b ad w o rk

done b y the s tu d en ts .

"A p ra c t ic e c o u r t conducted along th e se l i n e s , " S underland con ­

c lu d ed , " is no t an a p p ea l to th e sp e c ta c u la r , b u t a s e r io u s education

in s titu tio n . " " It i s the only m eth o d so f a r d ev ise d fo r teach in g the te c h -

94nique of the p ro fe s s io n in a c o n c re te w ay. "

T urn ing to the p r a c t ic e s of a n o th e r of the lead in g s c h o o ls - - th e

U n iv e rs ity of C hicago L aw S c h o o l--H e rm an O liphan t re p o r te d on h is

c o u rse in b r ie f m ak ing and le g a l a rg u m en t to the A s so c ia tio n of A m e ric a n

L aw Schools in 1916. He re p o r te d th a t the w o rk in h is su b jec t w as an

o u tg row th of the v o lu n ta ry c lu b s w ith som e m o d ific a tio n . The c lu b s h ad ,

fo r a n u m b er of y e a r s , b e e n e ffec tiv e ly o rg a n iz e d by the s tu d en ts .

D u rin g the 1913-1914 sch o o l y e a r the c lubs w e re co n so lid a te d . "An

in s t r u c to r , who e x e rc is e d g e n e ra l su p e rv is io n , p r e p a re d q u es tio n s fo r

a rg u m e n t, and chose s ix u p p e r c la s s -m e n on b a s is of m e r i t to a c t a s

ch ie f j u s t i c e s . " T h ese s ix s tu d en ts , a cco m p an ied by two o th e r m e m b e rs

of th e c la s s who s e rv e d a s a s s o c ia te ju s t ic e s , h e a rd a rg u m e n ts in a

s y s te m of ro ta tio n and g ra d e d the p a r t ic ip a n ts . T h is fo rm a t d rew a

9 4 lb id ., p . 61.

^ ^ H erm an O lip h an t, "A C o u rse in B r ie f M aking and L eg a l A rg u ­m e n t, " H andbook of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls and P ro c e e d in g s of the S ix teen th A nnual M eeting (C hicago , I l l in o is , D e c em ­b e r 2 8 -2 9 , 1916), V ol. 16, pp . 156-159.

144

n u m b er of c r i t ic i s m s : 1) th e re w as a la c k of u n ifo rm ity in the judging

s ta n d a rd s of the v a r io u s ju s t ic e s ; 2) c a s e s w e re too fre q u e n tly p o o rly

p re p a re d by the p a r t ic ip a n ts ; 3) s tu d en t a tto rn e y s w ere o ften d isc o u ra g e d

by the la c k of p re p a ra t io n of the ju s t ic e s ; 4) th e re w as o ften a g re a t

d ea l of tim e w a s te d b e c a u se s tu d en t c o u n s e lo rs devoted th e m s e lv e s to

i r r e le v a n t p o in ts of a r e s u l t of no g u id an ce .

A s a r e s u l t of th e se c r i t ic i s m s , a new c o u rse in b r ie f in g and

a rg u m en ta tio n w as c re a te d . P r o fe s s o r O liphan t d e s c r ib e d h is c o u rse

in th is w ay: "A fte r te n le c tu r e s and e x e r c is e s upon the u se of law bo o k s,

a m ee tin g of a l l m en in the f i r s t y e a r c la s s i s ca lled , " In th is m e e tin g ,

the s tu d en ts w e re g iven d ire c tio n on p r e p a ra t io n of c a s e s , w ritin g

b r ie f s , and m ak in g o r a l a rg u m e n ts , in ad d itio n to being g iven w ritte n

in s tru c tio n s h e e ts . E a c h s tu d en t th en a rg u e s a t le a s t two c a s e s a s

a tto rn e y and h e a r s two c a s e s a s an a s s o c ia te ju s t ic e , A t each c a s e ,

the a s so c ia te ju s t ic e co m es a lre a d y hav ing r e a d the b r ie f s and acq u a in ted

w ith th e ir c o n te n ts . T he o ra l a rg u m e n ts ru n fo r tw en ty -fiv e to fo r ty -

five m in u te s fo r each s id e , v a ry in g w ith th e n a tu re of the q u es tio n

u n d er in v e s tig a tio n , " E n tire s e r io u s n e s s ," sa id O liphan t, "an d m uch

in te r e s t is m a n ife s te d . The a tto rn e y s d isp la y no t only e a r n e s tn e s s bu t

o ften w a rm th . T hey a r e q u estio n ed c lo se ly , and u su a lly e f fe c ­

tiv e ly , , , . A cco rd in g to O liphan t, a l l the f i r s t y e a r m en w ere

^^Ibid, , p . 156. ^’ Ibid. ^^Ibid., p . 157,

145

r e q u ire d to do th is w o rk u n le ss ex cu sed fo r som e sp ec ific c a u s e , and

w h ile no c re d it to w a rd a d e g re e w as g iven fo r th is w o rk , e a ch s tu d en t

re c e iv e d a g rad e w hich in c lu d ed , am ong o th e r th in g s , h is w o rk in o ra l

a rg u m e n t.

A m ong the v a lu e s w hich O liphan t re c o g n iz e d f ro m h is c o u rs e w as

the opportun ity to m ove on f ro m the u n d e rg ra d u a te E n g lish w o rk in

a rg u m e n ta tio n w hich the s tu d en ts h ad and c o o rd in a te i t w ith the law w ork.

U nlike M ich ig an , H a rv a rd L aw School d id n o t see any v a lu e in

hav in g the s tu d en ts p r e s e n t c a s e s b e fo re ju r i e s . A s the C e n ten n ia l H is ­

to ry of the H a rv a rd L aw School (pub lished in 1917) p u t i t - - " . . . i t h a s

b e e n a so u rce of s a tis fa c tio n th a t the fa sc in a tio n of c o u r t p r a c t ic e h a s

n o t le d s tu d en ts to se e k m o re h a lf -e f fe c tiv e tra in in g in the p r a c t ic e side

of the law a t the ex p en se of the la s tin g b e n e f its of a th o ro u g h g rounding

in le g a l th ink ing . H ow ever, th is book n o ted th a t "v e ry g r e a t b e n e fits

h av e b een d e r iv e d . . . f ro m e x p e r ie n c e in the p re p a ra t io n of b r ie f s

and the p re s e n ta tio n of o r a l a rg u m e n ts b e fo re a judge o r a c o u r t of

a p p e a l, and i t i s h e r e th a t e f fo r ts have b een m ad e and r e s u l t s ach iev ed ,

The s tu d e n t- ru n c lu b s w hich w e re d e s c r ib e d in C h ap te r II co n tin u ed to

o p e ra te in m uch the sétme fa sh io n . On M arch 8 , 1910, the F a c u lty

^^C en ten n ia l H is to ry of the H a rv a rd L aw School, op. c i t . , p . 143.

^ ° ° Ib id ., pp . 143-144.

146

re c o g n iz e d the va lue of the c lubs by e s ta b lish in g a B o a rd of S tudent

A d v is e rs , The p u rp o se of th is B o a rd -Wras to enco u rag e " , , , am ong

f i r s t y e a r s tu d en ts e a r ly and in te ll ig e n t u se of the law l ib r a r y and a lso

fo r re n d e r in g the w o rk of the law c lu b s e ffic ie n t. . . . T h ese

a d v is e r s h e lp ed the new s tu d en ts in the p re p a ra t io n of th e ir b r ie f s and

s a t a s ju s t ic e s to h e a r th e i r a rg u m e n ts . In 1911» the F a c u lty e s ta b lish e d

p r iz e s of $200 and $100 fo r the two w in n e rs of the co m p etitio n am ong the

c lu b s .

T he v a lu e of th is w o rk w as in d ire c tly su g g ested by the C en ten n ia l

H is to ry w hen i t o b s e rv e d th a t in te r e s t in the c lu b s w as s tro n g in the

f i r s t y e a r and then d im in ish e d s ig n ifican tly in the second and th ird y e a r s .

The re a s o n g iven fo r th is w as the f a c t th a t the s tu d en ts who d id p o o rly

in the c la s s w o rk b e c a m e d isc o u ra g e d an d d ropped out of the v o lu n ta ry

c lu b s to c o n c en tra te on th e i r s tu d ie s . T h u s , the conclusion su g g ested

w as th a t only the s u p e r io r s tu d en ts con tinued w ith the c lu b s - - th o s e who

n eed ed the e x tra w o rk le a s t w e re the o n e s who re c e iv e d i t , w hile th o se

who h ad the g r e a te s t n e e d re c e iv e d none a f te r th e ir f i r s t y e a r ,

T he co m p e titio n am ong the c lu b s w as d e sc r ib e d in th is p a s sa g e

f ro m the C en tenn ia l H is to r y :

T he co m p e titio n i t s e l f w as an e lim in a tio n to u rn a m e n t. The a d v is e r s , su b je c t to the ap p ro v a l of the F a cu lty , f ra m e d m o o t

^Q^Ibid,, p, 145, ^Q^Ibid,, p, 146,

147

c a s e s fo r a rg u m e n t. A t each a rg u m e n t tw o re p re s e n ta t iv e s of one club w e re opposed by two re p re s e n ta t iv e s of an o th e r c lub .No re p re s e n ta tiv e of a club could a rg u e m o re than once, u n til a t le a s t s ix m en f ro m the club had a rg u e d . The ju d g es w e re to be s e le c te d by the com peting c lu b s , o r to be a s s ig n e d by the a d v is e r s . In the f in a l ro u n d th e re w e re to be no t le s s than th re e ju d g es . The ju d g e s in m aking th e i r a w a rd s w ere to co n ­s id e r the ab ility shown in the p re p a ra t io n of b r ie f s , in p re se n tin g a rg u m e n ts , in a c c u ra te ly and su cc in c tly s ta tin g the a u th o r it ie s c ite d , and in m ee tin g q u es tio n s pu t by th e c o u r t du ring a r g u ­m en t. The a d v is e r s w e re to reg u la te th e co m p etitio n in a l l m a t te r s no t sp e c ific a lly p ro v id e d fo r in th e re g u la tio n s .

T h is fo rm of co m p e titio n w as con tin u ed w ith no change th ro u g h

the 1913-1914 school y e a r , in sp ite of som e obvious o b je c tio n s - - in the

f i r s t p la c e , one d e fea t e lim in a te d an e n tire c lu b , and , second ly , i t w as

lik e ly th a t only two m en f ro m the club w ould h av e an opportu n ity to

a rg u e . To c o r r e c t th is , in 1914 the re g u la tio n s w ere changed to p ro v id e

fo r a ro u n d -ro b in co m p etitio n of s ix ro u n d s b e fo re the e lim in a tio n began .

The e n tire to u rn a m e n t took two y e a r s - - th e qualify ing rounds b e in g h e ld

d u rin g a s tu d en t’s second y e a r , and the e lim in a tio n s com ing the follow ing

y e a r .

At the School of L aw a t C olum bia U n iv e rs ity , the o p e ra tio n of

p r a c t ic a l w o rk w as e s se n tia lly the sam e a s a t H a rv a rd . The s tu d en ts

fo rm e d into v o lu n ta ry c lubs and o v er a p e r io d of two y e a r s engaged in

an e lim in a tio n co m p etitio n . In -1937 the F a c u lty gave som e re co g n itio n

of the value of th is w ork by o ffe rin g c re d it f o r m oo t c o u r t b r ie f s

lO ^ibid. , p . 147. p . 150.

148

su b m itted in lie u of r e g u la r ly a s s ig n e d e s s a y s , and by in c re a s in g the

s ta tu s of the s tu d en t m o o t c o u r t co m m ittee . A t C olum bia, h o w ev er,

som e d ifficu lty w as e n c o u n te re d fro m s tu d en t o b jec tio n s o v e r the

so c ia lly se g re g a te d n a tu re of the c lu b s . T h is ten d ed to w eaken the

a c tiv ity of the c lu b s.

A t the G eorge W ashing ton U n iv e rs ity L aw School the m oot c o u r t

p ro g ra m w as u n d er g r e a te r facu lty su p e rv is io n than a t e i th e r H a rv a rd

o r C olum bia. W alter C lep h an e , in ch a rg e of the p ro g ra m in 1913,.

n o ted th a t he had had ” . . . no d ifficu lty a t a l l in conducting a tho rough ly

o rg an iz ed m oo t c o u r t w ith w hat I b e liev e to b e e x c e lle n t r e s u l t s , upon

p r in te d s ta te m e n ts of fa c t . . . . H is m e th o d w as to hand the

stu d en ts a s ta te m en t of a c a se w hich h ad a r i s e n in som e c o u r t, and

ou tline to the s tuden ts som e of the fa c ts and su g g e s t c e r ta in lin e s of

a tta c k and defence . T hen the s tu d en ts w e re to fo rm u la te th e ir own lin e s

of a rg u m e n t, and p r e p a re th e i r c a s e s f ro m p lea d in g s to ev idence . The

p ro c e d u re w as to be the sam e a s a c tu a lly done in the c o u r ts ; i t d id not

m a t te r w hich ju r is d ic t io n the m a n n e r of p ro c e d u re w as d raw n fro m ,

b u t w h ich ev er one w as ch o sen , i t w as fo llow ed c lo se ly . "We t r y to

m ak e the m o o t c o u r t a s c lo se ly ak in to a r e a l c o u r t a s i t i s p o ss ib le to

lO^Goebel, o£. c i t . , pp. 340-342.

lO ^c iep h an e , "D isc u ss io n of the S u n d erlan d S peech , " P ro c e e d in g s of the T h ir te e n th , op. c i t . , p . 11.

149

m ak e i t , " C lephane s ta te d . "We have the ju d g e , th e c le rk , the c r ie r ;

w e have enough c o u r ts to d iv ide the c la s s e s up in to j u r i e s , each studen t

107h av in g som e d efin ite p a r t in the w o rk a s s ig n e d to h im . " In follow ing

h is c a s e , the s tu d en t law y e r w as to ap p ro ach the ju r y a s in a r e a l c a s e - -

in tro d u c in g w itn e s s e s (p re p a re d to r e la te f ic ti t io u s f a c ts ) , and even

a llow ing fo r c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n - -w h ic h n e c e s s a r i ly m u s t be u n sa tis fa c to ry .

H o w ev er, sa id C lephane , " s ix - te n th s of the a r t of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n . .

. c o n s is ts in know ing w hen to s to p . The s tu d en t v e ry qu ick ly f in d s out

w hen to stop h is c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of th e se w itn e s s e s on th e se f ic titio u s

f a c ts . In h is p ro c e e d in g s , C lephane d id n o t p e r m it the judge to

in te r r u p t the p ro c e e d in g s w hen h e fe l t i t n e c e s s a r y to co m m en t o r c r i ­

t ic iz e w hat the s tu d en ts w ere do ing . The c a se w as co m p le te d w ith the

a rg u m e n ts to the ju ry , the in s tru c t io n s of the judge to the ju ry , and

th en the v e rd ic t , and a f te r a ll w a s f in ish e d , the ju d g e took tim e to m ake

h is co m m en ts .

John D. F le m in g of the U n iv e rs ity of C o lo rad o in d ic a te d th a t h is

sch o o l’s m o o t c o u r t w o rk w as s im i la r to th a t a t G eo rg e W ash ing ton , but

he fe l t i t h ad an advan tage in a s m a ll s tu d en t body. He a rg u e d th a t in

sch o o ls w ith a la rg e e n ro llm e n t, i t w ould be qu ite d iff ic u lt to m a in ta in

the o rg a n iz a tio n n e c e s s a r y to su p p o rt auch a lo t of a c tiv ity .

1 0 7 lb id ., p . 12. ^Q ^Ib id ., pp . 12-13 .

109John D. F lem in g , "D isc u ss io n of the S u n d erlan d S p e e c h ," P ro c e e d in g s of the T h ir te e n th , op . c i t . , p . 14.

150

In h is P r e s id e n t ia l A d d re ss to the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw

S chools in 1912, D ean W illiam G. H a s tin g s of the U n iv e rs ity of N e b ra sk a

Law School n o t only d e s c r ib e d h is s c h o o l's p ro g ra m b u t a lso c r i t ic iz e d

the p r a c t ic e a t som e o th e r sch o o ls . He ch a rg e d m o s t of the sch o o ls

w ith te a ch in g the law and no t i ts ap p lica tio n . He sa id they o p e ra te u n d er

the a s su m p tio n th a t the s tu d en t h a s a life tim e to le a r n the a p p lic a tio n

and only th re e y e a r s to le a rn the p r in c ip le s . B u t he s ta ted th a t the

su b s ta n tiv e p r in c ip le s a ro s e out of the tr ib u n a ls and " . . . w e re fo rm e d

and o rg a n iz e d fo r the sake of such p r a c t ic e , in o rd e r to p e r f e c t the w ork

of th o se t r ib u n a ls , and have no o th e r ex cu se fo r th e ir e x is te n c e , "HO

"Any in s t r u c to r on any su b je c t, " con tinued H a s tin g s , "m u s t h av e le a rn e d

a t th e v e ry b eg in n in g of h is e x p e r ie n c e , th a t w hile id e a s can b e conveyed

and e m o tio n s a ro u se d d , by in d ire c t m eth o d s and su g g estio n , h a b its a r e

only re a c h e d by d i r e c t in s is ta n c e and p e r s is te n c e , a im ed im m e d ia te ly

a t the sought fo r p ro fic ie n c y . " H I D e sc rib in g h is s c h o o l's m e th o d s , he

sa id th a t " . . . w h e re we w ant p r a c t ic e , we w ant p ra c t ic e , and n o t

so m eth ing ab o u t p r a c t ic e , and we w ant i t a s a b so lu te an im ita tio n of the

genuine a r t ic le a s can . . . be o b ta in ed , " E x c e p t, he n o ted , in th o se

p la c e s w h e re the p ra c t ic e can b e m ade m o re e ffec tiv e a s a te ac h in g

110-yyilliam G, H a s tin g s , " P ra c t ic e C o u rts , " P ro c e e d in g s of the T w elfth A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S choo ls, op. c i t . , p p . 90 and 97.

^ “ ib id . , p . 97.

151

dev ice by som e change f ro m the m o d e l. H as tin g s m ad e th is com m en t

abou t the m a jo r i ty of the sch o o ls of the A .A , L , S. , of w hich he w as

P re s id e n t a t the tim e .

I t i s b e lie v e d th a t genuine im p ro v e m en t in o u r schoo ls in th is r e s p e c t w ill co m m en ce a s soon as a d ep p e r a p p re c ia tio n of the p o s s ib i l i t ie s of the w o rk in th is d ire c tio n i s re a c h e d by the in s t r u c to r s . To a la rg e ex te n t, w ork along th is line in the sch o o ls of the A sso c ia tio n se e m s to be le f t to the in itia tiv e of the s tu d en t. He is in v ite d to fo rm law c lu b s , an d by a lm o s t w holly v o lu n ta ry e f fo r ts th ro u g h them to g e t f a m il ia r i ty w ith c o u rt p r a c t ic e , som ew hat a f te r the m a n n e r of th e v o lu n ta ry l i t e r a r y an d debating s o c ie tie s of the c o lle g e s of a r t s , w hich w ere s tro n g e r in th o se c o lle g e s in y e a r s gone by th an they a r e now. In th o se s o c ie tie s e n e rg e tic and a m b itio u s s tu d en ts d id m uch to qu a lify th e m se lv e s fo r the a c tu a l w o rk of the h u s tin g s and the fo ru m . D o u b tle ss , such v o lu n ta ry w ork i s va luab le in the law sch o o l, and fo r th a t p o r tio n of the s tu d e n ts who thus v o lu n ta rily engage in i t w ith e n e rg y , i t m ig h t e a s i ly p ro v e m o re va luab le th an w ould any r e q u ire d e x e r c is e s . T he b ro ad en in g and ex tend ing of the c o u r s e s in the a r t s , the e n la rg in g of c la s s e s , and the m u ltip ly in g of in te r e s t s fo r the s tuden t in those in s titu tio n s h a s undoubted ly w eakened the l i t e r a r y s o c ie tie s , ju s t a s the b ro ad en in g and s tren g th en in g of the c u r r ic u lu m of the law sch o o l h a s too o ften d raw n a tten tio n aw ay f ro m the p ra c tic e c o u r ts .

It should be e m p h a s iz e d th a t th is w as a sw eeping in d ic tm en t of

the p ra c t ic e s in m o s t law sch o o ls in the U nited S ta te s a t the tim e . He

h ad , in s h o r t o r d e r , o b se rv e d th a t the schoo ls gave l ip - s e r v ic e to the

d e s ira b il i ty o f p r a c t ic e w o rk , b u t a t the sam e tim e w eakened i ts p o te n tia l

v a lue to the s tu d en ts by p e rm itt in g i t to be o rg a n iz e d and ru n by the

s tu d en ts , u n d e r s tu d en t d ire c tio n , and on a v o lu n ta ry b a s is .

H a s tin g s re c a l le d th a t a t the U n iv e rs ity of N e b ra sk a Law School,

a t f i r s t p r a c t ic e w as a v o lu n ta ry p ro g ra m , the schoo l i ts e l f having

^ Ib id ,, pp . 97-98 .

152

o r ig in a te d a s a v o lu n ta ry a s so c ia tio n of law c le rk s who cam e to g e th e r

to study w ith each o th e r . L a te r , H as tin g s n o ted , the p ra c t ic e c o u r ts

w e re m ade a co m p u lso ry p a r t of the c u r r ic u lu m , w ith in s t r u c to r s in

a tten d an ce a t a l l s e s s io n s . In 1910, a n o th e r change w as m ad e so th a t

only in s t r u c to r s w e re the ju d g es in the t r i a l c o u r ts . A law p r o fe s s o r

w as a lso p la c e d a t the h ea d of a su p re m e c o u r t , a s s i s te d by a n u m b er

of s tu d en ts , to h e a r a p p e a ls . T h is re o rg a n iz a tio n , he sa id , w as n e c e s ­

s a ry to g u a ran te e th a t the s tu d en ts d id in fa c t o b ta in the p ra c t ic a l

e x p e rie n c e rec o m m e n d e d . H ow ever, he n o ted , " . . . th e re a r e s t i l l

too m any s tu d en ts who do i t p e r fu n c to r ily , o r find g ro u n d s fo r avoiding

i t a lto g e th e r . Qne c r i t ic i s m of h is own sc h o o l's p ro g ra m w hich

H as tin g s m en tio n ed w as th e la c k of e x a m in a tio n s o r o th e r m e a s u re s

to a s s u re in cen tiv e to w o rk on the p a r t of th e s tu d en t.

O liv e r A . H a rk e r , in 1912, d e s c r ib e d the p r a c t ic e a t the U n iv e r­

s ity of I llin o is C ollege of L aw . When th e schoo l w as f i r s t s ta r te d th e re

w as no facu lty su p e rv is io n . T he P r e s id e n t of the u n iv e rs ity h ad m ade

an a r ra n g e m e n t w ith the ju d g es who w e re th en on the B ench to su b m it

c a s e s to the s tu d en ts to be t r i e d on a g re e d s ta te m e n ts of f a c t . The th re e

A p p ella te Ju d g es of the T h ird D is tr ic t of the s ta te c o o p e ra ted .

p . 98. ^ ^ % i d . , p . 108.

^ O liv er A , H a rk e r , "D isc u ss io n of the H a s tin g s S p e e c h ," P r o ­ceed in g s of th e .T w e lf th , op. c i t . , p . 20.

153

By 1912 , H a rk e r s a id , the p ro g ra m w as a r e q u ire d c o u rse w ith

a p r o fe s s o r in c h a rg e to c r i t ic iz e the w o rk of the in d iv id u a l s tu d e n ts .

"A ll s tu d en ts a r e r e q u ire d to d r a f t the in i t ia l p le a d in g - -n o t m e re ly

th o se s tu d en ts who a r e engaged in the c a s e , b u t e v e ry s tu d en t. "If

in tr ic a te q u e s tio n s of defense a r i s e , " con tin u ed H a rk e r , " th en a l l s tu ­

d en ts a r e r e q u ire d to d ra f t s p e c ia l p le a s . A ll p a p e r s a r e p a s s e d to

the p ro fe s s o r fo r ex am in a tio n . " The p r o fe s s o r c o r re c te d th e p a p e r s

and c a lle d the a tte n tio n of the c la s s to d e fe c ts in a p p ro a ch and p ro c e d u re .

"I do no t th in k , " H a rk e r sa id , d ire c tin g a n o th e r a t ta c k a t th e H a rv a rd

sy s te m , "m uch c a n b e ac c o m p lish e d b y the club c o u r t a lo n e . " He

s tro n g ly b e lie v e d th a t a school n eed ed bo th v o lu n ta ry c lu b s and p ra c tic e

c o u r ts u n d er the su p e rv is io n of the fa c u lty . ^

A t the U n iv e rs ity of W isco n sin L aw School, a cc o rd in g to John B .

S anborn , the p r o fe s s o r in c h a rg e , th e r e w as no a tte m p t to r e c r e a te an

a c tu a l t r i a l w ith ex am in a tio n of w itn e s s e s . R a th e r , a t W isco n sin the

a tte m p t to te a c h p ra c t ic e w as m ad e th ro u g h a g e n e ra l c o u rse in the

fu n d am en ta ls of p r a c t ic e , w hich w as su p p lem en ted by a p r a c t ic e c o u rt

in w hich the in s t r u c to r i l lu s t r a te d som e of the id e a s p r e s e n te d in the

c la s s . "You can n o t co v e r the th ing c o m p le te ly , o r you can n o t co v e r the

sam e ground w ith any two s e ts of s tu d en ts in d if fe re n t c a s e s u n le s s you

^ l % i d . . p . 22. l l^ Ib id .

154

t e l l th em w hat to do. . , , "^18 s tu d en ts w ere given a s ta te m e n t of

fa c ts and w e re a ss ig n e d to d isco v e r who th e p a r t ie s w ere know ing only

who w as to be c o n s id e re d th e ir c lie n t b u t u n aw are of who should be the

p la in tiff and who the defendan t. They w e re a lso a ss ig n ed to d isc o v e r

how they should g e t the c a s e into c o u r t. To do a com ple te t r i a l , even

u s in g the s h o r te s t c a se a v a ila b le , w as s t i l l too long fo r a m o o t c o u r t.

"We t r y to give s tu d en ts a chance to p r e p a r e a c a s e , to m ake th e ir

p ro o f of s e rv ic e , and th en the studen t a p p e a r in g fo r the defendan t com es

in and d e m u rs o r a n s w e rs o r m oves to s tr ik e out; then m o tio n s a r e

m a d e , and f in a lly , we com e down to the a c tu a l t r i a l . " R a th e r th an t ry

the c a s e , i t i s a r ra n g e d fo r a sp ec ia l v e r d ic t , the ju d g m en t i s e n te re d ,

and the d efea ted p a r ty ta k e s h is ap p ea l.

F ra n k M. P o r te r of the U n iv e rs ity of S outhern C a lifo rn ia C ollege

of L aw a d d re s s e d the A , A , L . S, w ith r e g a r d to h is p ra c t ic e p ro g ra m .

" F o r e ig h t y e a r s , " he s a id , "I have b e e n co n n ected w ith a schoo l in

w hich th e re h a s b een g rad u a lly developed an e la b o ra te m o o t c o u r t s y s ­

te m . T h is schoo l r e q u ire d two and a h a lf y e a r s of a c tu a l m o o t

c o u r t e x p e r ie n c e , and P o r te r te s tif ie d th a t the s tuden ts n eed ed no u rg ing .

l lS jo h n B . S anborn , "D iscu ssio n of the H astin g s S peech , " P r o ­c ee d in g s of the T w elfth , op. c i t . , p . 29.

1 1 9 ib id ., p . 30.

^^O prank M. P o r t e r , "D isc u ss io n of the H astin g s S peech , " P r o - c eed in g s of the T w elfth , op. c i t . , p . 32.

155

In re sp o n s e to the f re q u e n t o b jec tio n th a t p ra c t ic e w o rk tak es tim e th a t

cou ld b e t te r be spen t in o th e r s tu d ie s . P o r te r s a id , " . . . I th ink the

tim e i s w ell spen t, "^21 th e ir f re sh m a n y e a r , th e s tuden ts w e re g iven

le c tu r e s upon the duty of an a tto rn e y to h is c l ie n t , h is duty to the c o u r t

and to the s ta te , and le c tu r e s on the e le m e n ta ry p r in c ip le s of p r a c t ic e .

A t th e sam e tim e , the s tu d e n ts w ere re q u ire d to f ile two com p la in ts

and two a n sw e rs . D u rin g the second and th i rd y e a r s , the s tu d en ts

w e re re q u ire d to t r y fo u r c a s e s p e r y e a r , and a p p e a l two c a s e s . "T h ey

m u s t p re p a re th e ir p lead in g and t r i a l b r ie f s ju s t a s an a tto rn e y w ould in

an a c tu a l c o u r t. " The s tu d en ts w ere g rad ed and g iven ra tin g s on prom pt*

n e s s , p lead ing p re p a ra t io n and conduct in c o u r t. The studen t w as

e3q>ected to ob tain a t l e a s t the p a s s in g g rad e a s r e q u ire d in o th e r su b ­

je c t s . Inadequate p a p e r s w e re re tu rn e d to the s tu d e n t fo r c o r re c tio n .

" F in a lly , they com e to th e a c tu a l try in g of the c a se w hen they m u s t

1 2 s t r ik e ju ry , exam ine w itn e s s e s , e tc . . . . E v e ry T uesday n ig h t

w as s e t a s id e a t th is schoo l fo r the p u rp o se of m o o t c o u r t c a s e s . T hey

h ad tw elve la w y e rs on th e pay ro l l fo r the p u rp o se of ac ting a s ju d g es a t

th e se t r i a l s . In conclud ing h is r e m a rk s . P o r te r m ad e th is ev a lu a tio n

of the p ra c t ic e w o rk a t S o u th e rn C a lifo rn ia .

I t c o s ts m oney , ta k e s tim e , and r e q u ire s c a re fu l a tten tio n and su p e rv is io n , b u t I b e lie v e th a t i t p ay s . I t g iv e s the s tuden ts en th u s ia sm fo r th e i r life w o rk , b e s id e s g iving th em the n e c e s s a ry

IS ljb id ., pp. 32-33, 122ibid., p. 33. 123ibid,

156

in s tru c t io n , I do no t b e lie v e th a t i t is im p o ss ib le to teach p r a c t ic e . Of c o u rse , the te a c h e r m u s t know how to p ra c t ic e h im s e lf , if he is going to te a c h o th e r s , and i t i s n o t a t a ll d iff icu lt to fin d such te a c h e r s ,

In th is sec tio n , the m e th o d s of teach ing p r a c t ic e have b een

exam in ed in r e p re s e n ta tiv e sch o b ls th roughout the U n ited S ta te s , V a r ­

ia tio n s in teach in g p ro c e d u re an d ph ilosophy have b e en reco g n ized .

B efo re m oving on, th e re a r e th re e add itio n al r e fe r e n c e s w hich p re s e n t

som e g e n e ra l id e a s a s to the e x te n t and v a r ia tio n of p ra c t ic e c o u rs e s

w hich should be included . In 1902, Jo sep h H. B e a le , J r . w as a s s ig n e d

by the A s so c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw Schools to stuâjfythe f i r s t y e a r

c u r r ic u la of r e p re s e n ta tiv e law sc h o o ls , and r e p o r t h is find ings to the

A sso c ia tio n , A m ong o th e r c o n c lu s io n s , B eale o b s e rv e d th a t w hile

c o u rse s in p lead in g w ere o ffe re d to f i r s t y e a r s tu d e n ts , he could find

no school th a t a ttem p ted to te a c h p ra c t ic e o r the co m m u n ica tiv e a s p e c t

of p ra c t ic e to th e se s tu d en ts . W hile no p a r t ic u la r ph ilo so p h y w as d i s ­

co v e red , i t w as ap p a ren tly the c o n se n su s of law sc h o o ls th a t th is type

of tra in in g , if i t w as to be in c lu d e d a t a l l , should be r e s e r v e d to the

second and th ird y e a r s tu d en ts ,

Second, in 1921 John H , W igm ore p re s e n te d a m in o rity r e p o r t

of the C o m m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m of the A, A, L , S, w hich c a lled fo r m o re

124ibid ,

^^^Jo sep h H, B e a le , J r . , "T he F i r s t Y e a r C u rr ic u lu m of Law Schoo ls, " P ro c e e d in g s of th e S econd A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw Schools, V ol. 2 (1902), pp. 4 2 -5 1 ,

157

study and im p ro v e m e n t of th e c u r r ic u la of law sc h o o ls . He sa id , "In

th e p a s t 20 y e a r s the c u r r ic u lu m of the f i r s t - c l a s s law sch o o l h as no t

1 ? Ap r o g re s s e d . I t i s s tand ing s t i l l , " W igm ore m ad e th is fu r th e r

o b se rv a tio n .

D uring the l a s t d o zen y e a r s , som e tw elve su b je c ts h av e b e en u rg e d a s re q u ir in g a p la c e in the c u r r ic u lu m . T h o se p ro p o sa ls have com e f ro m re s p e c ta b le and even a u th o r ita tiv e q u a r te r s , and e v e ry one of th em i s re c o g n iz e d in the c u r r i ­cu lum of a t le a s t two sch o o ls . If any p e rc e p tib le p ro g re s s iv e ten d en cy e x is te d , a l l o r som e of th o se p ro p o s a ls w ould have re c e iv e d re c o g n itio n in a la rg e n u m b e r of sc h o o ls . The f ig u re s show th a t such rec o g n itio n h a s b e e n lack in g ,

A m ong the c o u r s e s to w hich W igm ore r e f e r r e d w as one e n ti t le d " P r o ­

fe s s io n a l S peech o r F o re n s ic V oice T ra in in g and D e liv e ry , " In the

A s s o c ia t io n 's su rv e y of the f if ty m e m b e rs of the A , A , L , S, , s ta te d

QW igm ore , i t w as d is c o v e re d th a t fiv e o ffe re d a c o u rse of th is type,

W ig m o re , who w as one of the le a d e r s in the founding of the A sso c ia tio n ,

an d who w as and i s re c o g n iz e d a s one of the le a d e r s in the developm ent

of orgsm ized study of ev idence and ju d ic ia l p ro o f , m ad e a p le a fo r the

study and p o s s ib le adop tion of som e of th e se c o u r s e s . T he evidence

g a th e re d in th is s tudy su g g e s ts th a t he w as u n s u c c e ss fu l.

F in a lly , a r e p o r t of q u es tio n ab le v a lu e , b u t one w hich should be

in c lu d ed n e v e r th e le s s , w as m ade by W illiam E , H igg ins of th e U n iv er­

s ity of K an sas School of L aw in 1912, H is co m m en t w as th is ,

^^^John H , W igm ore , "M in o rity R e p o rt of the C o m m ittee on C u r­r ic u lu m , " P ro c e e d in g s of the N in e teen th A nnual M eeting of th e A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 19 (1919), p , 34,

^27lbid,, p, 36, 128ibid ,, p, 37,

158

A n u m b er of y e a r s ago I h ad the p le a s u re of m aking a to u r of som e of the co lleg e s of th is co u n try to a s c e r ta in how they a r r iv e d a t c o n c re te p ro b le m s to b e p re s e n te d in th e ir p ra c t ic e c o u r s e s . I found th a t the p r a c t ic e c o u r ts w ere m a t te r s of p u b lic a tio n in th e i r ca ta lo g u es and th a t they d id n o t e x is t a s a fa c t,

C om bining the s ta te m e n ts of id e a l and o b jec tiv e s re g a rd in g the

p h ilo sophy of p r a c t ic a l le g a l ed u ca tio n w ith the r e p o r ts of a c tu a l p r a c ­

t ic e s in re p re s e n ta t iv e schoo ls p ro v id e s an u n d e rs tan d in g of the th e o r ie s

of le g a l rh e to r ic in A m e ric a n law sch o o ls . One conclusion b e c o m e s

p re d o m in a n t- - la w schoo l le a d e r s a r e la rg e ly un ited in the b e lie f th a t a

p r a c t i t io n e r of law n eed s to l e a r n the rh e to r ic a s w ell a s the p ro c e d u re

of le g a l p ra c t ic e ; b u t the sam e m e n have been n o ticeab ly d iv ided in

th e i r a ttitu d e re g a rd in g w hat th is am oun ted to and how to te a c h i t , A

com m on b e lie f h a s b een to the e ffe c t th a t p r a c t ic a l ed ucation should be

o b ta in ed b e fo re o r a f te r law sch o o l. If th is i s in d eed the c a s e , th en i t

m ig h t be ex p ec ted th a t the law sch o o ls w ould lak e the in itia tiv e in se ttin g

up re q u ire m e n ts fo r p r e - la w s tudy and B a r a d m iss io n w hich w ould

a s s u r e the ob ta in ing of th is ed u ca tio n . T h is i s the su b jec t of the n ex t

se c tio n ,

P r e -L a w R e q u ire m e n ts

The h is to ry of p re - la w and a d m iss io n re q u ire m e n ts i s a d is c o u r ­

ag ing study in g e n e ra l , and p a r t ic u la r ly so w ith r e g a rd to rh e to r ic a l

129'W illiam E , H ig g in s , " D isc u s s io n o f the H a s tin g s S p e e c h , " P r o c e e d in g s o f th e T w e lfth , op , c i t . , p , 25,

159

th e o ry . I t could be c h a ra c te r iz e d a s d e s ire fo r h igh s ta n d a rd s o v e rco m e

by doubt lead in g to in ac tio n . A lthough the H a rv a rd L aw School fo rm a lly

opened in 1817, and law sch o o ls w ere an e s ta b lis h e d in s titu tio n by the

m id d le of th e 19th C en tu ry , b e fo re 1876 no law sch o o l in the U nited

S ta te s r e q u ire d th a t a p p lic a n ts f o r ad m iss io n d e m o n s tra te any g e n e ra l

ed u ca tio n . By 1890, th i r ty p e r cen t of the law sch o o ls had adopted

som e e n tra n c e r e q u ire m e n ts , b u t in no c a se d id th e se c a ll fo r m o re

than a h igh schoo l ed u ca tio n , and sh o rtly th e r e a f te r , the b e s t the C om ­

m itte e on L e g a l E ducation of th e A m e rica n B a r A sso c ia tio n could do

131w as to céill fo r b e t te r p r e l im in a ry tra in in g w h ere i t w as p ra c tic a b le .

The A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law Schools cam e into e x is te n c e in

1900, and im m e d ia te ly c o n c e rn e d i ts e lf w ith the q u e s tio n of p r e - la w

re q u ire m e n ts . F ro m the d is c u s s io n s th a t took p la c e in the y e a r ly

m e e tin g s of th is g ro u p , a good b i t can be le a rn e d ab o u t the s ta tu s of

rh e to r ic a l tra in in g in the m in d s of the le a d e r s of the law sch o o ls , and

the ex ten t to w hich they w ould go to se c u re i t . A t th e i r f i r s t m ee tin g

in A ugust, 1900, the A sso c ia tio n m e m b e rs a g re e d to dem and a h igh

schoo l ed u ca tio n o r i t s eq u iv a len t of a s tu d en t b e fo re a d m iss io n to any

schoo l in th e A .A ^ L . S. No com m en t w as m ad e co n cern in g the con ten t

Alfred Z. Reed, P resent-D ay Law Schools, op. c it. , p. 130.

13 1 lb id .

160

o r q u a lity of the education ; a l l th a t w as r e q u ire d w as c e r tif ic a tio n of a

h igh schoo l edu ca tio n . Two y e a r s l a t e r , i t w as d isc o v e re d th a t

s ig n if ic an t v io la tio n s of th is r e q u ire m e n t w e re b e in g co m m itted by m e m ­

b e r s of the A sso c ia tio n , an d the q u es tio n of e:q>ulsion f ro m the

133o rg a n iz a tio n w as r a i s e d a s a p o s s ib le m e a n s of e n fo rc e m e n t.

In 1904, a m a jo r a d d re s s w as p r e s e n te d by H a r ry S. R ic h a rd s ,

D ean of the U n iv e rs ity of .W isconsin C o llege of L aw co n cern in g the

q u e s tio n of the q u a lity of p r e - le g a l t ra in in g . R ic h a rd s po in ted out th a t

the re q u ire m e n t of a h igh schoo l ed u ca tio n w as m is le a d in g due to the

g r e a t d iffe re n c e am ong h igh sch o o ls . Som e, he s a id , h ad s ta n d a rd s no

h ig h e r th an th e seven th and e ig h th g ra d e s in o th e r schoo l d i s t r ic t s .

In o th e r c a s e s , he o b se rv e d , law sch o o ls w hich a r e la x in a d m in is te r in g

th e i r e n tra n c e r e q u ire m e n ts s im p ly a d m it s tu d en ts who do not p o s s e s s

th e n e c e s s a r y ed u ca tio n a l r e q u ire m e n ts . A d d itio n a lly , acco rd in g to

R ic h a rd s , s tu d en ts b e tw een ag es 16 and 18 a r e s im p ly no t m a tu re enough

fo r law study.

^^^P ro c e e d in g s of the F i r s t A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 1 (1900-1901), p . 10.

133p ro c e e d in g s of the T h ird A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e r ic a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 3 (1903), pp. 5 -2 0 .

^ ^ ^ a r r y S. R ic h a rd s , "E n tra n c e R e q u ire m e n ts fo r Law S ch o o ls , " P ro c e e d in g s of the F o u r th A nnual M eetin g of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 4 (1904), p . 29.

161

T u rn in g to th o se law sch o o ls re q u ir in g a co lleg e education p r io r

to law school a d m iss io n , R ic h a rd s m ade the sam e o b se rv a tio n a s he had

ab o u t h igh sch o o ls ; c o lle g e s v a r ie d s ig n if ic a n tly in th e q u a lity of th e ir

p r o g ra m s . On the o th e r h an d , th e sp e a k e r f e l t th a t fo u r y e a r s of co lleg e

p lu s law schoo l w as too long to ex p ec t a s tu d en t to devo te to h is p r e p a ­

ra t io n fo r the B a r . H is r a th e r vague co n c lu s io n w as th a t s ta n d a rd s

n e ed ed to be r a i s e d g ra d u a lly ; he did no t su g g e s t a m e a n s of a s s u r in g

q u a lity and he d id n o t su g g e s t the l im it to be p la c e d on quan tity of p r e -

le g a l ed u ca tio n , o th e r th an to su g g e s t th a t tw o y e a r s of co llege should be

1 OCa r e q u is i te .

In 1905, the A . A , L . S. adop ted a ru le th a t m e m b e rs m u s t r e q u ire

a t l e a s t fo u r y e a r s of h igh schoo l of s tu d en ts p r io r to a d m iss io n .

A nd, in 1906, the A s so c ia tio n adop ted the fo llow ing re so lu tio n : "R e so lv ed ,

T h a t any schoo l w hich g iv e s a d e g re e to a s tu d e n t who h a s s tu d ied law

fo r l e s s th an th re e y e a r s i s n o t com plying w ith A r t ic le VI of the A r t ic le s

of th e A sso c ia tio n . T h is w as s e r io u s ly o b je c te d tq by som e m e m ­

b e r s , and th e p a s sa g e of the re so lu tio n r e s u l te d in th e w ith d raw al of the

U n iv e rs ity of M aine School of L aw fro m the A sso c ia tio n . T h u s, i t w as

no t u n til th is tim e th a t any co m p le te a tte m p t to p r e s c r ib e the e n t ire

^35ibid.

136p r o c e e d in g s of the F if th A nnual M eeting of th e A sso c ia tio n of A m e r ic a n ;Law S c h o o ls . V o l . 5 (1905), p . 11.

137p r o c e e d in g s o f th e S ix th A nnual M e e tin g o f the A s s o c ia t io n of A m e r ic a n L aw S c h o o ls , V o l. 6 (1906), p . 7.

162

p e r io d of p r e - la w an d law school ed u ca tio n w as m ad e , and th is did not

a ffec t th o se sch o o ls n o t belonging to the A .A , L . S.

The d ev e lo p m en t of ru le s g o v ern in g p re - la w study w e re rev iew ed

by W illiam P , R o g e rs in h is P r e s id e n t ia l a d d re s s of 1907. "Only a

s h o r t tim e ago , " he r e c a l le d , " s tu d e n ts w e re p e rm itte d to e n te r m o st

of o u r law sch o o ls w ithou t any p re l im in a ry q u a lifica tio n . On th is su b ­

je c t th e re w e re no fix ed ru le s . "138 The r e s u l t , he sa id , w as the

a ccep tan ce of young m e n s tra ig h t f ro m the fa rm o r f ro m c le rk in g in a

s to re w ithou t even a g ra m m a r schoo l ed u ca tio n in m any c a s e s . "We

have a l l o b se rv e d , " s a id R o g e rs , " . . . how th o se w ith d e f ic ie n t p r e p a ­

ra tio n have s tu m b led th ro u g h l ife , c a r ry in g the p ro fe s s io n a s a b u rd en ,

w ith a p e rp e tu a l apology fo r a la c k of an ed u ca tio n . . . . "139

T u rn in g h is a tte n tio n to the q u e s tio n of the con ten t of the p re - la w

c o u rse of stu d y , R o g e rs no ted , "We shou ld a g re e th a t one canno t take too

m uch of w hat is d e s ig n a te d a s the c o u rse in E n g lish ; fo r the law y er who

can u se w ith flu en cy an d a c c u ra c y the w o rd s of the E n g lish language is

in th is r e s p e c t equ ip p ed fo r the law . . , ."1 4 0 "Too m uch e m p h a s is , "

he sa id , "can n o t b e la id upon a w e l l - s e le c te d c o u rse of th is k ind . "

^^^WiHjLam P . R o g e rs , "A tiàiress of the P re s id e n t , " P ro c e e d in g s of the Seventh A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S choo ls, V ol. 7 (1907), p . 73,

^^^Ibid. l^ O jb id ., p . 77.

163

Speaking m o re sp ec ific a lly of o r a l u se of lan g u ag e , R o g e rs m ad e the

fo llow ing s ta tem en t:

Of la te y e a r s the a r t of p u b lic speak ing h a s b e en som ew hat s n e e re d a t . We a r e to ld th a t th is i s the age of s c ie n c e , and th a t e loquence and w e ll - r ounde d sen te n c es do n o t c o m p o rt w ith sc ie n tif ic study of any k ind; th a t the u n iv e r s a l i ty w ith w hich m a g a z in e s and n e w sp a p e rs a re re a d , th u s k eep in g the g e n e ra l p u b lic w ell in fo rm ed on a l l to p ic s , h a s sw ep t f ro m th e o ra to r h is b a se of in flu en ce , an d th a t he h a s , th e ré fo rp , lo s t h is p o s itio n of le a d e rsh ip av long m e n , and .;a s y ie ld e d h is p la c e a t the B a r to the q u ie t, u n im p as sioned lo g ic ia n who w ins the c o u r t by the fo rc e of h is p la in b u t lo g ic a l s ta te m e n ts . I am w illin g to a d m it th a t m e r e ly rounded s e n te n c e s , th a t lo fty p h r a s e s coup led to g e th e r w ithout thought, a r e now , if they h ave no t a lw ays b een , w o rse th an u s e le s s . B u t I do n o t a d m it th a t th e tim e h a s p a s s e d w hen th e a b ility to s tan d on o n e ’s fe e t and th ink w ell and ra p id ly , and to c lo th e one ' s thoughts in good E n g lish , i s a p p re c ia te d by the g e n e ra l p u b lic . I doubt if th e r e h a s ev e r b e en a tim e w hen such a b ili ty w as so m uch a p p re c ia te d o r so h ig h ly v a lu ed a s the p r e s e n t . The pow er of th e genuine o ra to r to g a in h is p o in t, h is a b ili ty no t only to c a r r y w ith h im the c ro w d , b u t to w in ju r i e s and c o u r ts , w as n e v e r g r e a te r than to d ay . The g ra c e fu l a r t of pub lic speak ing m ay have lo s t som e of i ts ad v o c a te s and d e v o tees , b u t he who h a s i t p e r fe c te d p o s s e s s e s a g ift w hich i s in v a lu ab le .And to e v e ry young m a n w ho c o n tem p la te s a l ife a t th e B a r , I w ould say m is s no o p p o rtu n ity to c u ltiv a te th is a r t ; tak e ad v an ­tag e of e v e ry o ccas io n w hich g iv es you a chance to th ink and ta lk in p u b lic , b u t r e m e m b e r n e v e r to do so u n le s s you have som e thoughtful m e ss a g e to p re s e n t .

In th is , the f i r s t p ro n o u n cem en t on the co n ten t of p r e - le g a l ed u ­

c a tio n by an o ffic ia lly d e s ig n a te d r e p re s e n ta t iv e of A m e ric a n law sch o o ls ,

i t i s of in te r e s t th a t th is s tro n g a s ta te m e n t in b eh a lf of sp eech tra in in g

^"^^Ibid., pp. 77-78.

164

w as in c lu d ed . H o w ever, no fo rm a l a c tio n e ith e r a c ce p tin g o r m odify ing

the p ro p o sa l w as tak en ,

SpeéLking in 1915, H a r ry S, R ic h a rd s ag ain r a i s e d the q u es tio n of

p r e - le g a l e d u ca tio n a l r e q u ire m e n ts . He o b se rv e d f i r s t th a t the p re c e d in g

te n y e a r s h ad seen a dec id ed change of a tti tu d e , so th a t law school

le a d e r s g e n e ra lly re co g n iz ed th a t a law s tuden t shou ld have som e u n iv e r ­

s ity tra in in g f i r s t . He rem in d e d the m e m b e rs of the A , A . L , S, th a t the

o rg a n iza tio n reco m m en d ed , b u t d id not r e q u ire , th a t two fu ll y e a r s of

co llege p re c e d e law school e n try , " J u s t w hat the c h a ra c te r of th is w o rk

should b e , " R ichard sco o n tin u ed , " is a m a t te r of c o n tro v e rs y . I s i t

enough th a t a s tu d en t have two y e a r s of any kind of w o rk o ffe re d in

c o lleg e , " the sp e a k e r in q u ired , " o r should th is w o rk b e p r e s c r ib e d w ith

re fe re n c e to the subsequen t le g a l s tu d y ? ipj^g s p e a k e r - - P r e s id e n t

of the A , A , L , S, - -p ro c e e d e d to m ak e the follow ing o b se rv a tio n .

The ten d en cy of the s tu d en t, if a llow ed to choose w ithout r e s t r ic t io n , is to tak e p ub lic speak ing and the p ro p h e tic o r sp ecu la tiv e sc ie n c e s of p o li t ic a l econom y and socio logy; b u t the m o re obvious n eed of the s tu d en t f r e s h f ro m the h igh sch o o ls i s d isc ip lin e , the p u r s u i t of su b jec ts th a t re q u ire fo r th e i r m a s te ry c lo se a tte n tio n and e x a c tn e s s . S ubjects th a t a r e to a c o n s id e ra b le e x te n t sp ecu la tiv e a r e m o re p r o ­fitab ly r e s e r v e d to the l a s t two y e a r s of a co lleg e c o u rse ,

In h is reco m m en d a tio n , R ic h a rd s p ro p o sed th a t the s tu d en t tak e

in the f i r s t two y e a r s of co llege E n g lish , L a tin o r G re e k , G erm an o r

^"^^Harry 8, R ic h a rd s , "A d d re ss of the P r e s id e n t ," P ro c e e d in g s of the F ifte e n th A nnual M eeting of th e A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law Schools, V ol, 15 (1915), p , 66.

143ibid.

165

F re n c h , m a th o r n a tu ra l s c ie n c e , h is to ry (E n g lish o r A m e r ic a n C o n s ti­

tu tio n a l) , p sy ch o lo g y . If m o re co lleg e i s d e s ir e d , he su g g e s te d th a t

the s tu d en t th en take p o li t ic a l s c ie n c e , p o li t ic a l eco n o m y , and soc io logy .

He m ad e no fu r th e r m en tio n of pub lic speak ing .

A s la te a s 1924 the A s so c ia tio n w as s t i l l a sk in g th e q u e s tio n s

r e la te d to p r e - le g a l ed u ca tio n and tak ing no a c tio n . In a r e p o r t of the

C o m m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m fo r th a t y e a r a su rv ey w as in c lu d ed r e p o r tin g

the o p in ions of v a r io u s law sch o o ls on the m a t te r . A sk ed f i r s t if any

c o u rse should be r e q u ire d fo r law schoo l a d m iss io n , 31 law sch o o ls

gave an u n q u a lified n eg a tiv e a n sw e r; 12 a n sw e re d a f f irm a tiv e ly . Of

th o se in fav o r of re q u ir in g a c o u r s e , five w ould d em an d only E n g lish

b e s tu d ied ; no o th e r s in g le su b je c t o r c o u rse r e c e iv e d m o re th an one

v o te . Of the 31 o th e r sch o o ls , 14 w ould be in fa v o r o f reco m m en d in g

c o u rs e s to be tak en w ithout m ak in g th em a r e q u ire m e n t. If the sch o o ls

d e s ir in g to re q u ire a c o u rse a r e com bined w ith th o se w illin g to r e c o m ­

m en d , an d a tab u la tio n is m ad e of the su b je c ts m e n tio n e d , 7 p ro p o se d

the tak in g of a c o u rse in p u b lic speak ing and 18 m e n tio n e d com positionf'^ '^

P re s e n t in g a m o re g e n e ra l p ic tu re of the p r e - la w r e q u ire m e n ts ,

R eed re p o r te d in h is 1928 s u rv e y th a t the q u es tio n of w h a t su b je c ts the

144iiR eport of the C o m m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m , " H andbook of the A s so c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S chools and P ro c e e d in g s of the T w en ty - Second M eetin g , V ol. 22 (1924), p , 36,

166

s tu d en t s tu d ied d u rin g h is u n d e rg ra d u a te o r p re - la w y e a r s w as u su a lly

le f t to the in d iv id u a l s tu d en t to d e c id e , su b jec t to the g e n e ra l re g u la tio n s

of the co lleg e he a tten d ed . "A study of the A nnouncem ents fo r 1925-26 , "

R eed n o ted , " re v e a ls th a t of s ix ty -fiv e th r e e -y e a r fu ll- t im e law sch o o ls ,

re q u ir in g a t l e a s t two c o lleg e y e a r s fo r a d m iss io n , only n ine in s i s t th a t

a p p lic a n ts who p r e s e n t the m in im u m re q u ire m e n ts sh a ll have s tu d ied

c e r ta in su b je c ts in ad d itio n to th o se p r e s c r ib e d fo r co lleg e s tu d en ts in

g e n e ra l, In a l l th e sc h o o ls , acco rd in g to R eed , an a p p lic a n t w as

a c c e p te d if he h ad co m p le ted the co llege d e g re e , r e g a rd le s s of the

c o u rs e s ta k e n . R eed a lso re p o r te d th a t d u rin g in v e s tig a tio n in the

1922-23 schoo l y e a r , he d is c o v e re d the fo llow ing c o u rse s fa v o re d by

law sch o o ls fo r p r e - la w study ; h is to ry , eco n o m ics , and E n g lish , in ­

cluding bo th w r itte n co m p o sitio n and pub lic speak ing .

In h is own a n a ly s is of the p ro b le m of p r e - le g a l ed u ca tio n , R eed

a sk e d w h e th e r the function of such tra in in g w as to p re p a re fo r the study

of law , o r to p ro v id e the s tu d en t w ith th a t p o r tio n of h is ed u ca tio n w hich

the law schoo l w ould be u nab le to p ro v id e in v iew of the m any b u rd e n s

and l im ite d tim e i t h a d a v a ila b le . R eed p ro c e e d e d th is w ay.

145Aifred Z. Reed, P resent-D ay Law Schools, op. c i t . , p. 201.

^'^^Ibid., p. 203.

%

167

If a tte n tio n i s d ire c te d p r in c ip a lly to p re p a ra t io n fo r the law schoo l, th en the tra in in g of the s tu d e n t's m in d w ill seem to m any m o re im p o rta n t th an the in fo rm a tio n a l a sp e c t of h is w o rk , A know ledge of h is to ry , of g o v e rn m e n t, and of eco n o ­m ic s m ay b e of som e im m e d ia te b en e fit to the law studen t, in enab ling h im to do ju s t ic e to the w ork of the schoo l, b u t i t i s doubtful w h e th e r i t i s of g r e a t b en efit, p a r t ic u la r ly in v iew of the fa c t th a t the in s tru c t io n p ro v id ed in th e s e su b jec ts i s no t d ire c t ly k ey ed to h is fu tu re n eed s . The dev elo p m en t of h is rea so n in g p o w e rs , on the o th e r hand, is of im m ed ia te b e n e f it to h im ; and th is end can n o t u su a lly be so re a d ily a tta in e d in th e se su b jec ts a s in o th e rs in w hich m o re p r e c is e th inking i s r e q u ire d . If , h o w e v e r, w e s ta r t f ro m a d if fe re n t p re m is e , and r e g a rd the co lleg e y e a r s a s p a r t of the p re p a ra t io n of the s tu ­d en t fo r h is p ro fe s s io n , th en we a re m o re lik e ly to reco g n ize the im p o rta n c e of g iv ing h im in fo rm a tio n , and in te r e s ts , th a t w ill be of v a lu e to h im d u rin g h is e n tire c a r e e r . T h is in fo rm ­a tio n can b e s e c u re d , and th e se in te r e s t s c a n be s tim u la ted , d u rin g h is C oliege y e a r s b e t te r than a t any o th e r tim e . F ro m th is po in t of v iew i t w ould even seem p re fe r a b le - - s h o u ld th is p ro v e n e c e s s a r y - - to a d ap t the w ork of the law school to the re a so n in g c a p a c ity of the b ro a d ly ed u ca ted s tu d en t, and t r u s t to the d isc ip lin e of the law w o rk to sh a rp e n h is m ind to a k e e n e r edge, r a th e r th an to ru n the r is k of s a c r if ic in g to a single a im o th e rs of eq u a l im p o rta n c e .

To the w r i te r the seco n d of th ese two av en u es of ap p ro ach to the p ro b le m se e m s c le a r ly the one th a t should be fo llow ed,, , , A c u r r ic u lu m th a t i s to be of the g r e a te s t p o ssib le b e n e ­f i t to the fu tu re p r a c t i t io n e r should in c lu d e n o t only su b je c ts th a t a re in tim a te ly co n n ec ted w ith h is te c h n ic a l s tu d ies and m ay be s a id to fo rm p a r t of "the law , " in th e b ro a d e s t s e n se .Of th is s o r t a r e p o li t ic a l h is to ry and g o v e rn m en t (p o litica l sc ien ce ). I t shou ld a lso inc lude o th e r s u b je c ts th a t cannot b e b ro u g h t u n d e r any such d efin itio n , h o w ev er b ro a d , and y e t m a y b e u sefu l to the la w y e r in h is p ro fe s s io n a l c ap ac ity . Of th is s o r t a r e c o u r s e s th a t give h im a know ledge of b ra n c h e s of sc ien ce o r of b u s in e s s (econom ics) w hich h is law p ra c tic e m a y touch . Of th is s o r t a lso a r e c o u rse s th a t develop p ro fic ien cy in the u se of c e r ta in im p o r ta n t too ls th a t a r e not p e c u lia r to the la w y e r 's a r t , and y e t a r e co n stan tly em p lo y ed by h im . Such a r e E n g lish e x p re s s io n , both w ritte n and o r a l , and accounting ,

^^■^Ibid., pp. 203-204,

168

A p p aren tly R eed i s w illin g to iden tify s e p a ra te fu n c tio n s a s of

va lue to the p o te n tia l law s tu d en t, bo th a k een m in d and a b ility to th ink

and the " to o ls" of E n g lish e x p re s s io n , w r itte n and spoken. A s d id

m o s t of the le g a l e d u c a to rs , R ee d th e o r iz e d th a t co m m u n ica tio n and

p e rsu a s io n e x is te d a s s e p a ra te f ro m the m e n ta l p r o c e s s e s . T h is r e l e ­

g a te s rh e to r ic a l th e o ry to the p o s it io n i t o ccu p ied in m any of the

M edieval s c h o o ls . C h a r le s S e a r s B aldw in co m m en ts th a t any ju d g m en t

of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry m u s t be m ad e in lig h t of i t s re la tio n to g ra m m a r

an one hand and log ic on the o th e r . "L og ic m ay be u sed fo r a n a ly s is

w ithout p re s e n ta tio n , " say s B aldw in . He c o n tin u e s , "T h is , indeed , is

a b s tr a c t ly i t s p ro p e r fu n c tio n , and in d ic a te s i t s re la tio n to ph ilosophy .

. . . " B ut B aldw in n o te s , in p r a c t ic e log ic b e c o m e s r e la te d to rh e to r ic ,

" . . . and c o n v e rse ly r h e to r ic , b y y ie ld ing i t s f ie ld of inven tio to lo g ic ,

148m ay be red u c e d to the study of s ty le . R eed p ro b ab ly w ould have

a g re e d w ith the c h a ra c te r iz a tio n of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry includ ing only

s ty le and d e liv e ry .

In the 1950*s th e re w as a f lu r r y of in te r e s t in p re le g a l education

beginning w ith the a s s ig n m e n t of A r th u r T , V a n d e rb ilt to p r e p a re an

C h a r le s S e a rs B ald w in , M ed iev al R h e to ric and P o e tic (G lou- c e s te r , M a ssa c h u se tts : P e t e r S m ith , 1959), p . 91.

169

ex h au stiv e r e p o r t on the su b jec t. He s ta r te d by rem o v in g the hyphen.

In se ttin g out on h is s e a rc h , V a n d e rb ilt s a id he ex p ec te d to find a " m a ss"

of l i t e r a tu r e on the su b jec t of p r e le g a l ed u ca tio n . " . . . To m y s u r ­

p r i s e , " he sa id , "I found th a t r e la t iv e ly l i t t l e h ad b e e n w r i tte n on the

su b je c t and th a t m o s t of i t , m o re o v e r , w as c a su a l and s u p e rf ic ia l . . .

V a n d e rb ilt a lso d isc o v e re d im m e d ia te ly th a t th e re w as u n an im ous

op p o sitio n to the se ttin g -u p of a l i s t of sp e c ific c o u r s e s to be re q u ire d

fo r e n try in to law sch o o l.

In re sp o n s e s to q u e s tio n n a ire s se n t to law sc h o o ls , V an d erb ilt

le a rn e d of the c r i t i c i s m s being m a d e of s tu d en ts e n te r in g law school.

M ore ac u te th an the co m p la in ts a s to in a c c u ra te o r hazy know ledge o r even e n tire la c k of in fo rm a tio n c o n ce rn in g th e ir in te lle c tu a l and so c ia l en v iro n m e n t i s the w e ll-n ig h u n iv e rs a l c r i t ic is m re sp e c tin g the in a b il i ty of law s tu d en ts to th in k s tra ig h t and to w r ite and speak in c le a r , fo rc e fu l, a t t r a c t iv e E n g lish .A lm o st ev ery o n e who d is c u s s e s law sch o o l s tu d e n ts - - o r even , i t m u s t b e added , young law sch o o l g r a d u a te s - -h a s an unkind w ord to say abou t th e ir la c k of ad eq u a te p o w e rs of o r a l and w r itte n e3q>ression in th e ir n a tiv e tongue . Such c r i t i c i s m , on a n a ly s is , g e n e ra lly r e la te s a s m u ch to d e fe c ts in th ink ing a s to fa u lts of e x p re s s io n ,

^ ^^A rth u r T. V a n d e rb ilt, "A R e p o r t on P r e le g a l E d u ca tio n , "N ew Y ork U n iv e rs ity L aw R ev iew , XXV, 2 (A p ril, 1950), p . 200. V a n d e rb ilt u se d the com m on sp e llin g " p re - le g a l" a s a n i l lu s tr a t io n of the la c k of a tte n tio n w hich had b e e n d ev o ted to the su b je c t. He said " p re m e d ic a l" h ad b eco m e com m on, b u t " p re le g a l" h ad n o t. V a n d e rb ilt’s sp e llin g w ill be ad o p ted fo r the re m a in d e r of th is s tu d y ,

^^°Ibid. ^ ^ % id ., p. 203. ^^^Ibid., pp. 209-210.

170

The l a s t sen te n ce shows a g lim m e rin g a w a re n e s s th a t th e re i s a

n e c e s s a r y re la t io n b e tw een w hat i s c a lle d th ink ing and e x p re ss io n . A

re la t io n w hich R eed , a s n o ted above, w as unw illing to m ak e . B u t the

p ro b le m th a t R eed fo u n d -- th e in a b ility to a g re e on w hat the c o lle g e s

should b e a sk ed to do fo r the p o te n tia l law s tu d e n t—w as s t i l l ev id en t in

V a n d e rb il t 's s tudy . T he q u estio n s t i l l rev o lv ed a ro u n d the p ro v is io n of

sp e c ific in fo rm a tio n to a s s i s t the s tu d en t in h is le g a l s tu d ie s o r the

tra in in g of the s tu d e n t 's fa c u ltie s in a n tic ip a tio n of the ta sk s of le g a l

p r a c t ic e , o r should the s tuden t s im p ly be e n co u rag ed to ob ta in a b ro a d

l ib e r a l education .

T hroughou t h is in q u iry , V a n d e rb ilt d is c o v e re d the value g iven to

c ap a c ity to d ea l in language fo r one e n te r in g law . A lthough the co m m en ts

con tin u ed to d is c u s s language fro m the p e rs p e c t iv e of g ra m m a r and

l i t e r a tu r e , the fo llow ing s ta te m en t re sp e c tin g the study of lo g ic , s c ie n -

t i f iç m eth o d , and p sy ch o lo g y shows a f u r th e r a w a re n e s s of the re la t io n

of th e se d isc ip lin e s to r h e to r ic a l th e o ry .

To som e m en who have n o t h ad the good fortkm e of having h a d a g re a t te a c h e r , log ic se e m s lik e no th ing m o re th an a s e r i e s of m e n ta l c a r d t r ic k s , b u t w ith an in s p ir e d guide i t m a y becom e th e k ey th a t un locks th e w o rld of re a so n in g . To study lo g ic a s th e sc ie n ce and a r t of in q u iry , to o b se rv e how i t s p r in c ip le s h av e b een ap p lied to the p h y s ic a l s c ie n c e s in b ro ad en in g out s p h e re s of know ledge and e n r ich in g o u r l iv e s ,

153ib id ., p . 210.

171

to p e rc e iv e how f a r the m eth o d s of n a tu ra l sc ie n ce can be ad ap ted to the study of so c ie ty in i t s v a r io u s a s p e c ts , to le a rn how th e se p r in c ip le s of log ic a r e p u t to w ork in the a s c e r ta in ­m e n t of t ru th in ju d ic ia l p ro c e e d in g s , i s to give the s tu d en t new p o w er o v e r h im se lf and h is en v iro n m en t. L og ic a s the sc ie n ce an d a r t of ex p lan a tio n can a lso teach h im m uch about the a r ra n g e m e n t and c la s s if ic a tio n of know ledge and h e lp h im to p u t h is though ts in the b e s t p o s s ib le fo rm fo r com m unica tion to o th e r s . I t c an te a c h h im how to avo id com m on f a l la c ie s on h is own p a r t and how to d e te c t th em in o th e rs . W ith the a id of p sych o lo g y i t c an p u t h im on g u a rd a s to p itfa lls of p ro p ag an d a .A n ed u ca ted m an h a s b een defin ed a s one who h a s the ab ility to a c t on a ll the a v a ilab le ev idence a t the m o m en t w hen ac tio n b e c o m e s n e c e s s a ry . If th is d e fin itio n i s t r u e , i t w ould then a p p e a r th a t the ab ility to ev a lu a te ev idence is a p r a c t ic a l m a t te r of tre m e n d o u s im p o rta n c e no t only fo r the law studen t b u t fo r e v e ry m an .

P sy ch o lo g y , like lo g ic , depends upon the teach in g . . . .W ith th is equ ipm ent of log ic an d psycho logy , the a r t of w ritin gta k e s on new m e a n ii^ and debating b ec o m e s som eth ing m o re ..........—th an a 'talk* f e s t . ^

In r e fe re n c e to the ta lk f e s t ch a llen g e a g a in s t d eb atin g , V a n d e r­

b i l t q u o tes J e ro m e P o u n d 's ch a rg e th a t debating u n d e r G eorge P ie rc e

B a k e r a t H a rv a rd invo lved a th o ro u g h -g o in g c r i t ic a l and lo g ic a l a rg u ­

m e n t, w h e re a s m o d e rn debating te n d s to give too m uch a tten tio n to

w inning a vo te of the au d ien ce . S til l , th e re fo re , the co m m en ta to r

sp eak s of co m m u n ica tio n , logic and psycho logy , and p e rs u a s io n a s

som ehow d iffe re n t and in d iv id u a l e n t i t ie s . And y e t, V an d e rb ilt looks

fo rw a rd to th e com bining of th e se e le m e n ts in w r itte n and spoken c o m ­

m u n ica tio n . T h ese o b se rv a tio n s a r e qu ite rev ea lin g w ith r e g a rd to the

r h e to r ic a l th e o r ie s of le g a l e d u c a to rs .

154 ib id ., pp. 254-255.

172

M uch of the v a lu e to th is study in the ex am in a tio n of the p r e le g a l

r e q u ire m e n ts r e s t s in the e f fo r ts to c h a r a c te r iz e the ro le s o r ta sk s

w hich face a p ra c t ic in g a tto rn e y . In h is 1950 r e p o r t V a n d e rb ilt g iv es

s tro n g e m p h a s is to the ro le of ad v o ca te . "In the f in a l a n a ly s is , " he

s a y s , " . . . bo th the d ev e lo p m en t of the law and the p ro fe s s io n a l w o rk

of e v e ry law y er depend upon the w o rk of the ad v o ca te , re p re s e n tin g h is

c lie n t in c o u r t , o r b e fo re an a d m in is tra tiv e tr ib u n a l o r a le g is la tiv e

body . . . . ''1 5 5 I t i s in th e se s itu a tio n s , the au th o r d e c la r e s , th a t the

law is u ltim a te ly te s te d and re je c te d o r v in d ic a te d . I t i s the a d v o c a te 's

w o rk th a t d e te rm in e s how an office la w y e r a d v ise s h is c lie n t. Involved

in the w o rk of the a d v o ca te , a c co rd in g to V a n d e rb ilt , a r e the ta sk s

of u n d er s tand ing fa c ts and law , h um an n a tu re , the so c ia l en v iro n m en t

of p a r t ic u la r l i t ig a tio n , and the c ap ac ity to re a s o n the com m unique. 156

E la b o ra tin g upon th e s e , he s a y s .

The a d v o c a te 's g ra sp of f a c ts , h is co m p reh en sio n of the law , h is know ledge of hum an n a tu re , and h is u n d e rs ta n d in g of h is en v iro n m e n t a ll s e rv e m e re ly to supply the raw m a te r ia l fo r the e x e rc is e of h is p o w ers of re a so n in g , n o t in the a b s tr a c t b u t w ith r e la t io n to h is sp ec ific c a s e . The so lv ing of p ro b le m s i s the la w y e r 's ta s k w h e th e r i t be in the t r i a l of c a s e s o r in g iv ing sound ad v ice in h is o ffice . G en e ra lly th ey a r e c r i t ic a l p ro b le m s in the l iv e s of h is c lie n ts and n o t m e re m a t te r s of ro u tin e .

1 5 5 ib id ., pp . 265-266 . ^56^^^^^ p , 267.

173

R easo n in g is a step in the p re p a ra t io n fo r the t r i a l of a c a s e and i t i s w orthw hile only to the d e g re e th a t he i s a b le to e3q>ress h im se lf in w o rd s o ra l ly and in w ritin g .

F o llow ing the V a n d e rb ilt r e p o r t , the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw

Schools to o k som e a c tio n . In 1951, the C o m m ittee on P r e le g a l E ducation

reco m m en d ed th e e s ta b lis h m e n t of a l i s t of d e s ir e d s k ills an d in s ig h ts .

T h e ir re c o m m e n d a tio n s in c lu d ed , am ong s k il ls , co m m u n ica tio n , fac t

em p lo y m en t, re a so n in g , and th ink ing . A s in s ig h ts , the c o m m itte e

158in c lu d ed sem a n tic - -lan g u ag e and l i t e r a tu r e . The fo llow ing y e a r the

A sso c ia tio n ad o p ted a s p o licy the follow ing s ta te m e n t.

B u t w hile i t c o n s id e rs the p r e s c r ip t io n of p a r t ic u la r c o u r s e s u n w ise , the A sso c ia tio n can p ro p e r ly c a ll a tte n tio n to the q u a lity of u n d e r -g ra d u a te in s tru c t io n w hich i t b e lie v e s fu n d a ­m e n ta l to th e l a t e r a tta in m e n t of le g a l co m p eten ce . T h a t q u a lity of ed u ca tio n i s c o n c e rn e d w ith the d ev e lo p m en t in p r e ­law s tu d en ts of b a s ic s k il ls and in s ig h ts . I t th u s in v o lv es ed u ca tio n fo r :

A . C o m p reh en s io n an d e x p re s s io n in w o rd s;B . C r i t ic a l u n d e rs ta n d in g of the h um an in s titu tio n s an d

v a lu e s w ith w hich the law d e a ls ; andC. C re a tiv e p o w er in th ink ing .

S h o rtly s ta te d , w hat th e law sch o o ls seek in th e ir e n te r in g s tu d e n ts i s n o t a cc o m p lish m e n t in m e r e m e m o riz a tio n b u t a c c o m p lish m e n t in u n d e rs ta n d in g , the cap ac ity to th ink fo r th e m s e lv e s , and the a b ility to e x p re s s th e i r though ts w ith c la r i ty and fo rc e .

ISTib id . , pp . 280 an d 282.

158iip^eport of the C om m ittee on P r e le g a l Education, " Handbook of the A sso c ia tio n of A m erican Law Schools and P ro ceed in g s of the F orty-n inth M eeting, V ol. 49 (1951), pp. 150-165.

159iii^eport of the C o m m ittee on P r e - L e g a l E d u c a tio n , " H andbook of th e A s so c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S chools and P ro c e e d in g s of the F if t ie th A nnual M eetin g , V ol. 50 (1952), pp . 99-114.

174

W ith th e se s ta te m e n ts the law sch o o ls r e s te d th e ir c a s e . T hey would

re fu s e to te l l the co lleg e s o r s tu d e n ts w hat c o u rse s to take in p re p a ra tio n

fo r law schoo l. T hey w ould u rg e th a t a good college ed u ca tio n be

o b ta in ed , and th ey w ould s t r e s s the v a lu e of language and though t to the

la w y e r .

In th is c h a p te r le g a l ed u ca tio n h a s b een p ro b ed fo r ev idence of

e d u c a to r s ’ v iew s of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in le g a l p ra c t ic e . I t h a s been

d isc o v e re d th a t th e a ttitu d e of th e se e d u c a to rs h a s b een s tro n g ly in fluenced

by th e ir s tru g g le fo r id en tity and p o w er w ith the p ra c tic in g p ro fe s s io n .

T h a t i s , in th e i r e f fo r t fo r p o s itio n , they em p h asized th e ir s tre n g th in

the teach in g of le g a l p r in c ip le s a lm o s t to the ex clusion o f a l l e ls e .

T h is h a s le d to e x te n s iv e in q u iry in to the p ro p e r ro le of the law school

w ith in the p ro fe s s io n , and am ong o th e r e d u c a to rs . A nd f ro m th is in q u iry

h a s com e a f ra g m e n te d view of th e ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s . By iso la tin g know ­

ledge of le g a l p r in c ip le s , the e d u c a to rs have com e to in d iv id u a lize th e ir

a p p ro a c h to g ra m m a r , s ty le , in v en tio n , a r ra n g e m e n t, and e x p re ss io n .

In the le g a l c u r r ic u la and in the d is c u s s io n s of p re le g a l r e q u ire m e n ts ,

th e re is ev id en ce of a tendency to s e p a ra te sk ills and in s ig h ts involved

in th e le g a l p r o c e s s and a tta c k th em ind iv idually .

T h is s e p a ra tio n of m e n ta l p r o c e s s e s on one hand and com m unicative

p r o c e s s e s on the o th e r leav es a r h e to r ic a l th e o ry s im ila r to th a t com m on

in the M iddle A g es and e a r ly R e n a is sa n c e , a s d isc u s se d by B aldw in . In

175

such a th e o ry - -w ith s ty le and d e liv e ry s e p a ra te d f ro m th ink ing and con ­

t e n t - - i t i s only to be ex p ec ted th a t a c e r ta in co n tem p t should o ccu r

re g a rd in g the em p ty n ess of pu b lic speak ing , ju s t a s i t d id in the c a se of

the so p h is ts . In the law sch o o ls such a con tem pt is m a n ife s t. C once iv ­

ab ly in d i r e c t re a c tio n to the u l t r a - p r a c t ic a l i ty of the law o ffice , in

w hich a s tu d en t w as tau g h t how to w in a c a s e , the law sch o o ls s tud iously

avo ided teach in g anything th a t m ig h t be c o n s tru e d a s s tr a te g y fo r t r i a l s .

P r a c t ic a l c o u rse s tend to include the study of p ro p e r p ro c e d u re , fo rm s ,

r u le s , and o th e r te c h n ic a l i t ie s , and avoid any d isc u s s io n of m eth o d s by

w hich a sp ec ific c a se m ig h t be won. The th e o ry s tro n g ly su g g es ted by

such d a ta i s th a t if the law y er d is c o v e rs the f a c ts , a r r a n g e s th em lo g i­

c a lly , p ro p e r ly know s the p r in c ip le s of law a p p lic a b le , and obeys the

ru le s of p ro c e d u re , he w ill be su c c e ss fu l if h is c a se i s m o re d ese rv in g

of the ap p ro v a l of the law than h is o p p o n en ts '.

Such a s ta te m e n t a s th a t above r a i s e s a q u es tio n . I s such a

th e o ry su p p o rted by th o se m e m b e rs of the p ra c tic in g p ro fe s s io n whose

d a ily o b jec t is the w inning of sp ec ific c a s e s ? T h a t q u es tio n w ill b e p u r ­

sued in the n ex t c h a p te r .

C H A PTE R IV

A LEG A L RH ETORIC O F PRA C TITIO N ERS

A s s ta te d in C h ap te r I , i t i s the p u rp o se of th is study to in v e s tig a te

the q u es tio n s (I) D oes a r h e to r ic a l th e o ry u n d e rlie m o d e rn A m e ric a n

le g a l d ec is io n -m ak in g ; and if so , w hat c h a r a c te r iz e s the th e o ry ; and

fin a lly , (3) if a th e o ry o r th e o r ie s i s found, does the ap p lica tio n a p p e a r

to be v a l id a te d / The ex am in a tio n of A m e ric a n le g a l ed u ca tio n in the l a s t

two c h a p te rs p ro v id e s s tro n g ev id en ce of the e x is te n c e of a rh e to r ic a l

th e o ry . F u r th e r , in th o se c h a p te r s the c h a ra c te r of the th e o ry w as

d is c u s s e d f ro m the p e rsp e c tiv e of the le g a l s c h o la r . In th is c h a p te r , the

c h a r a c te r is t ic s of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in A m e ric a n le g a l d e c is io n -m a k in g

w ill be in v e s tig a te d f ro m the v iew po in t of the p r a c t i t io n e r .

F i r s t , i t i s u se fu l to u n d e rs ta n d the value in looking a t le g a l

rh e to r ic a s a p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y w ould u n d e rs ta n d i t . The sc h o la r o b ­

s e rv e s the le g a l sy s te m a s i t i s d e s ig n ed to p ro v id e the m e c h a n ism of

ra tio n a l ju d g m en t in the a p p lic a tio n of law . The p r a c t i t io n e r lo o k s upon

the sy s tem a s an advocate - -one d e d ica te d to advancing the cau se of h is

c lie n t by w h a te v e r m e an s the sy s te m w ill a llo w . The a tto rn e y is e j e c t e d

176

177

to p lay two ro le s : he i s bo th an o ff ic e r of the c o u r t and an a d v e r s a ry

b e fo re the c o u r t. W ith th e ad d itio n of the l a t t e r r o le , the p r a c t i t io n e r

ten d s to v iew the r h e to r ic a l th e o ry involved in th e ju d ic ia l sy s te m in a

d iffe re n t se n se than w ould the sc h o la r .

A su g g estio n of the d iffe rin g a ttitu d e s of s c h o la r and p ra c t i t io n e r

w as g iven in the l a s t c h a p te r . B r ie f ly , i t in v o lv ed a co n flic t in p ed ag o ­

g ica l a p p ro a c h . The s c h o la r ten d ed to p u t m o s t e m p h a s is upon the

p r in c ip le s of law u n d e r th e a ssu m p tio n th a t if p r in c ip le s w e re u n d e rs to o d ,

th e ir ju s t a p p lic a tio n w ould e a s ily fo llow . T he p r a c t i t io n e r , on the o th e r

h and , w as in c lin e d to fa v o r the a p p re n tic e sh ip m e th o d of le g a l edu ca tio n ,

w h ere le g a l p r in c ip le s w e re c e r ta in ly h e ld to b e im p o r ta n t, b u t g re a t

a tten tio n w as g iven to the p ro c e s s of ad ju d ica tio n a s w e ll. The p r a c t i ­

t io n e r s , b e in g d a ily in v o lv ed in th is p r o c e s s , su g g e s te d th a t w ithout an

u n d e rs tan d in g of r h e to r ic a l th e o r ie s invo lved in a d ju d ica tio n , the p r in c ip le s

of law w ould la c k the s tre n g th of e ffec tiv e ap p lic a tio n . T he a tto rn e y who

knew p r in c ip le s b u t la c k e d e3q>erience in the c o u r ts s t i l l h ad a good d ea l

to le a r n .

S u ccessfu l a t to rn e y s have w r itte n e x te n s iv e ly on the, su b jec t of the

p ro c e s s and th e o ry of the a p p lica tio n of law . P o s s ib ly th ey have done

th is to f i l l the gap le f t by the v i r tu a l r e fu s a l of th e law sch o o ls to study

the su b je c t in a w ay the p r a c t i t io n e r s deem n e c e s s a r y . P o s s ib ly the

178

su c c e ss fu l a t to rn e y s w rite about th e ir s u c c e s s e s f ro m the com m on

m o tiv e of s e lf -g lo r if ic a tio n . T he re a so n s a r e not im p o rta n t. I t i s the

o b je c t of th is c h a p te r to exam ine the id e a s of p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s with

the p u rp o se of d isc o v e rin g th e ir a tt i tu d e s to w ard rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in

le g a l p r a c t ic e . In it ia l ly , th re e p ro b le m s p re s e n t th e m se lv e s .

F i r s t a d e c is io n m u s t be m ad e in te r m s of the o rg a n iz a tio n of

the c h a p te r . I t w ould be p o ss ib le to o rg a n ize th is d isc u ss io n a ro u n d the

c la s s ic a l p a t te rn of rh e to r ic - - in v e n tio n , a r ra n g e m e n t, s ty le , d e liv e ry ,

and m e m o ry . H o w ev er, th a t a p p ro ac h h a s b een re je c te d in fav o r of an

o rg an iz a tio n in t e r m s of the rh e to r ic a l ta s k s of the p ra c tic in g a t to rn e y - -

(1) la wye r - c l ie n t in te rv ie w s ; (2) p re p a ra t io n of p lead in g s; (3) obtaining

in fo rm a tio n ; (4) s e le c tio n of the ju ry ; (5) p re se n tin g an opening s ta tem en t;

(6) d ire c t ex am in a tio n of w itn e sse s ; (7) c ro ss -e x a m in a tio n of w itn e sse s ;

(8) p re se n tin g c lo s in g a rg u m en t; and 9) advocacy b e fo re c o u r ts of appeal.

T he d isc u s s io n of the ta sk s w ill be p re c e d e d by a b r ie f ex am in a tio n of

the p r e r e q u is i te s f e l t n e c e s s a ry to the su c c e ss fu l p ra c tic e of law . T his

o rg a n iz a tio n h a s b e e n se le c te d b e c a u se i t a llow s fo r a m o re c le a r ex am i­

n a tio n of r h e to r ic a l th eo ry in law and i t i s the s tru c tu re g e n e ra lly u sed

by the w r i te r s th e m se lv e s ,

A second p ro b le m inv o lv es the d ec is io n a s to the sp ec ific ity

r e q u ire d in p re s e n tin g a m ean ing fu l le g a l r h e to r ic . The w r i te r s tend to

179

show a w ide ran g e f ro m g e n e ra l th e o ry to sp e c ific su g g estio n s fo r

b e h a v io r . H e re the d e c is io n h a s b een to p r e s e n t fa ith fu lly the g e n e ra l

th e o r ie s and a s m any sp e c ific s a s seem n e c e s s a ry to m ake fo r a r e a s o n ­

ab le u n d e rs tan d in g of the w hole r h e to r ic .

F in a lly , a th i rd p ro b le m is th a t of d e te rm in in g how m an y op in ions

should be in c lu d ed to p ro v id e a r e p re s e n ta t iv e r e p o r t of the a t ti tu d e s of

p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s . F i r s t , the s e le c tio n is c le a r ly lim ite d to th o se who

have w r itte n on the su b je c t. Second, w hile a g re a t m any op in ions have

b e e n rev iew ed , i t h a s b een d isc o v e re d th a t the po in t is soon re a c h e d éifter

w hich the add itio n of m o re does no t s ig n if ic a n tly change the o u tco m e.

T h e re fo re , th o se a u th o rs sp ec ific a lly r e f e r r e d to in th is c h a p te r have

b e en se le c te d on the b a s is of r e p re s e n ta t io n r a th e r than ex h au s tio n of the

supply .

The P r e r e q u is i te s of the S u c c e ss fu l A tto rney

B efo re d isc u s s in g the ta s k s of an a tto rn e y , w r i te r s on the su b jec t

a r e in c lin ed to ta lk ab o u t the in d iv id u al t r a i t s n e c e s s a ry to b eco m e a

su c c e ss fu l la w y e r. T h is i s c o n s is te n t w ith the p a t te rn s e ÿ by C ic e ro - -

one of the f i r s t p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s to w r i te r h e to r ic a l t r e a t is e s - - w h e n

he d isc u s se d the p r e r e q u is i te s of the id e a l o r a to r a s includ ing n a tu ra l

g ifts a s w e ll a s b ro a d know ledge and p r a c t ic e , A d h eren ce is th u s g iven

^J, S, W atson (T ra n s , ) , C ice ro on O ra to ry and O ra to rs ; w ith H is L e t te r s to Q u in tus an d B ru tu s (London; H en ry G, Bohn, 1855), pp . 171- 220,

180

to w hat som e w ould c a ll a t r a i t - th e o r y of law y er b e h a v io r - - th e a s s u m p ­

tio n of value in studying p e rs o n a l t r a i t s n e c e s s a ry to p e r fo rm c e r ta in

ta s k s .

Speaking of th e se n a tu ra l g ifts o r t r a i t s , m o d e rn w r i te r s have

sa id an in d iv id u a l, to b eco m e a la w y e r , should h ave good s e n se , sound

u n d er stand ing , sub tle g en iu s , be f r e e f ro m fa u lts of in d ec is io n , tim id ity ,

fa ls e sh am e , h a s te , and n o n ch a lan ce . The law y e r should be ab le to

2co n tro l h is te m p e r . He should have a h ea lth y fra m e capab le of en d u rin g

the lo n g -co n tin u ed e x e r tio n of m ind and body w hich com es w ith the

ex c item en t of the c o u r tro o m and pub lic speah ing . F in a lly , a s tro n g

v o ice is re q u ire d . One is n o t ex p ec ted to be a su c c e ss fu l ad v o ca te w ith

a s m a ll, th in v o ice o r one w om an ish o r w e a k . G e n e r a l l y , a la w y e r is

ex p ec ted to have an a t tra c t iv e p e rs o n a li ty , p e rc e p tio n , k ee n n ess of

o b se rv a tio n , c le a rn e s s and q u ick n ess of c o m p re h e n sio n , the fa cu lty of

sound and p ro m p t ju d g m en t, and the p o w er of im ag in a tio n . ^

T h is l i s t of t r a i t s se e m s to d e s c r ib e a su p e r-h u m an in d iv id u a l.

T h e re a re som e th e o r is ts today who fe e l th a t such an a n a ly s is in t e r m s

of t r a i t s is no t p a r t ic u la r ly u se fu l. They w ould p r e f e r an a n a ly s is f ro m

^H enry H ard w ick e , The A r t of W inning C a se s o r M odern A dvocacy , A P r a c t ic a l T re a t is e on P re p a ra t io n fo r T r ia l , an d the Conduct of C a se s in C o u rt (2d ed«3 A lbany , New Y ork: B anks & C o . , 1920), p . i i i ,

3F ra n c is L , W ellm an , D ay in C o u rt o r The Subtle A r ts of G re a t

A dvocates (New Y ork : The M acm illan C om pany, 1914), p . 25,^ Ib id . , p . 26. ® Ibid., pp . 28; 33; 34; 35.

181

the ta s k s w hich m u s t be p e r fo rm e d . P ro b a b ly the w r i te r s on le g a l r h e ­

to r ic w ould a g re e th a t few , if any , su c c e ss fu l a t to rn e y s can be found in

p o s s e s s io n of a l l the t r a i t s l i s te d above, n o r do a l l the ta s k s of the

a tto rn e y r e q u ire th a t such a com b in atio n of t r a i t s b e b ro u g h t to b e a r a t

once.

S till in a g re e m e n t w ith the an c ien t w r i te r C ic e ro , the m o d ern

p r a c t i t io n e r s ex p ec ted the ad v o ca te to have b ro a d know ledge. W hile no t

going so f a r to sp ec ify c o u r s e s to be tak en in sc h o o l, th e se w r i te r s

e m p h as iz ed ag a in and ag a in the n e c e s s ity fo r the a tto rn e y to follow the

p a t te rn of B acon and take a l l know ledge fo r h is d o m ain . He m u st not

only u n d e rs ta n d fu lly the p r in c ip le s of the law , b u t a lso r e a d ex ten s iv e ly

in a l l o th e r f ie ld s . M ost f re q u e n tly m en tio n ed w as a tho ro u g h study of

the c la s s ic s , l i t e r a tu r e in g e n e ra l and the B ib le in p a r t ic u la r , ^ W hat i s

c a lle d the study of hum an n a tu re is g iven h ig h im p o rta n c e w ithin the

r e a lm of b ro a d know ledge. The p ra c t ic e of law d ep en d s upon dealing

w ith o th e r s so m e tim e s th ro u g h the exchange of in fo rm a tio n , so m e tim es

to p e rsu a d e th e m . To do th is e ffec tiv e ly , the la w y e r w as e:jq)6Cted to

study o th e r m en to le a rn w hat m e an s w e re a v a ila b le . The b e s t m e a n s

of le a rn in g ab o u t hum an n a tu re , acco rd in g to one w r i te r , " , , , i s c a r e ­

fu lly to in te r ro g a te your own e x p e r ie n c e , and see how you a r e y o u rse lf

^H enry H ard w ick e , o£, c i t , , p . 25,

182

a ffe c te d , The b ro a d f e a tu re s of b e h a v io r , th is w r i te r con tinued , a re

s im i la r am ong a l l m en re g a rd le s s of e x te rn a l d iffe re n c e s . T h u s , if one

know s h im s e lf , he know s m u ch about o th e rs as w ell. T h is s ta tem en t

th e o r iz e s g re a t value to com e f ro m such a p ro je c tiv e p r o c e s s a s a s su m ­

ing c h a r a c te r is t ic s ex is tin g in o n ese lf to re s id e in m o s t o th e r s . L a te r

s ta te m e n ts by su c c e ss fu l a t to rn e y s w ill em phasize the v a lu e in re a liz in g

in d iv id u a l and group d iffe re n c e s w hich m ay be a lto g e th e r d iffe re n t f ro m

e3q>eriences o r c h a r a c te r is t ic s known to the a tto rn e y . Som e m o d ern

c o m m e n ta to rs on com m unica tion w ould r a is e se r io u s doubt a s to theQ

e ffe c tiv e n e s s of the fo rm e r p ro je c tiv e th e o ry .

Im p o rta n t am ong the p r e r e q u is i te s of the s u c c e ss fu l a tto rn e y w as

the study of the th e o r ie s of rh e to r ic and o ra to ry and the s tudy and c r i t i ­

c is m of g r e a t s p e a k e rs of the p a s t, H en ry H ardw icke, a m e m b e r of the

N ew Y o rk B a r and the au th o r of The A r t of Winning C a s e s o r M odern

A dv o cacy , devoted a g re a t p o rtio n of h is book to the d isc u s s io n of the

a n c ie n t c o u r t p ro c e d u re s in E g y p t, G re e c e , and Rom e a s w e ll a s the

m e th o d s of speak ing u se d in the v a r io u s c o u rts . The v a lu e of speaking

to th e s e ad v o ca te s is e x p re s s e d in th is s ta tem en t.

U n d er som e nam e o r o th e r la w y e rs have ex is ted in a l l c iv ilized s o c ie tie s , and alw ays w ill n e c e s s a r i ly e x is t a s long a s hum an

^I b id , , p . 56,

®See D avid K, B e r io , The P r o c e s s of C om m unication (New Y ork: H o lt, R in e h a r t and W inston, I n c , , I960 ), pp. 122-131,

183

n a tu re re m a in s im p e rfe c t , and i t b ec o m e s n e c e s s a ry to a d m in is te r the law . They have a lw ays cham pioned the c au se of the innocen t and the w eak a g a in s t ty ran n y and in ju s tic e ; th ey have alw ays b een am ong the m o s t en ligh tened , c o u rag eo u s and p a tr io t ic m e m b e rs of so c ie ty .

T he o rd e r of ad v o ca te s w ould n e v e r have b een in flu e n tia l b u t fo r the fa c t th a t i ts m o s t i l lu s tr io u s m e m b e rs have a s s id u o u s ly cu ltiv a ted the a r t of speak ing w ell, ^

W ith r e g a rd to the study of the rh e to r ic a l th e o r ie s of the a n c ie n ts ,

th e re is f re q u e n t m en tion of C ice ro ; le s s f re q u en t m en tio n of Q u in tilian ;

and v e ry r a r e ly is A r is to t le reco m m en d ed a s good read in g fo r the

p o te n tia l ad v o ca te . The w r i te r s of e a r ly tw en tie th cen tu ry le g a l rh e to r ic s

w e re c o n c e rn e d th a t th e studen t ad ju s t h is th e o r ie s to (he c u r r e n t tim e ,

H ard w ick e p u t h is p o in t th is way:

W hile we do not ad v ise a s e rv ile im ita tio n of the m eth o d s p u r ­sued by C ic e ro , f o r , in fa c t , t im e s have changed to such an e x te n t and the m o d es of in s tru c tio n a r e now so ra d ic a lly d if fe re n t f ro m th o se in C ic e ro ’s day , th a t i t w ould be im p o ss ib le , y e t , n o tw ithstand ing a l l th is , m u ch p ro f i t m ay be d e r iv e d f ro m a c a re fu l su rv ey of h is life ,

A long w ith the study of th e o r ie s of o ra to ry and r h e to r ic , the young

law y er w as en co u rag ed to study the l iv e s of g re a t la w y e rs to l e a r n w hat

he could of the so u rce of th e ir g re a tn e s s . H ow ever, one w r i te r cau tioned

the s tu d en t to g u ard a g a in s t the lik e lih o o d th a t in such r e p o r ts on the

life of g r e a t m e n th e re i s a tendency to s t r e s s the sp e c ta c u la r an d leav e

u n m en tioned m uch of th e p lodding, h a rd w o rk w hich i s n e c e s s a ry to the

^H enry H ard w ick e , 0£ , c i t , , pp , 250-251 , ^^Ib id . , p p . 266-267,

184

ad v o ca te b u t w hich do es n o t m ak e fo r good rea d in g , I t w as f e l t by

som e th a t the p r im e m e th o d of teach in g eloquence w as by exam ple ; th a t

th e study of the lead in g c h a r a c te r is t ic s of g re a t o r a to r s and th e i r sp e e ch es

w as a s v a lu ab le to the p o te n tia l sp e a k e r a s the study of g r e a t m a s te r -

12p ie c e s of a r t w as to the s tu d en t a r t i s t , H ardw icke p re s e n te d h is l i s t

of the g re a t a d v o c a te s who d e s e rv e d study , and in c lu d ed b r ie f rh e to r ic a l

c r i t ic is m s fo r each one. The l i s t in c lu d ed P e r ic le s , D em o sth e n es ,

C ic e ro , a l l the A ttic o r a to ry . L o rd E rskL ne, W illiam M , E v a r ts , R ufus

C hoate , D an ie l W e b s te r , S ir J a m e s S c a r le t t , P a t r ic k H e n ry , H en ry C lay

and W illiam P in ck n ey ,

To b eco m e acq u a in ted w ith the c u r re n t p r a c t ic e s and m eth o d s of

s u c c e ss fu l la w y e rs , the s tu d en t w as to ld to go to c o u r t and w atch the

le a d e r s of the p ro fe s s io n in a c tio n . H e re , c le a r ly , i s an ap p ea l fo r the

v a lu e s to be o b ta in ed th ro u g h th e o ld a p p re n tic e sy s te m . B e tte r even

th an w atch ing the good la w y e rs in c o u r t w as the a s s is t in g of h im so a s

to be acq u a in ted w ith the p la n s and s tr a te g y w hich a r e n o t m en tio n ed in

open c o u rt, F r a n c is L , W ellm an , a su c c e s s fu l a tto rn e y h im se lf and a

^^W m, S co tt S te w a rt, S te w a rt on T r ia l S tra te g y , P r a c t ic a l Sug­g e s tio n s to the Young L a w y er on How to O btain and H old C lie n ts , How to P r e p a r e and T ry L a w su its (Chicago: The F lo o d C o ,, 1940), p , 2,

l^ H e n ry H ard w ick e , og. c i t , , p , 324,

l^ lb id , , pp , 254; 256-257; 283; 299-300; 303,

185

fre q u e n t c o n tr ib u to r to the l i t e r a tu r e of le g a l r h e to r ic , m ad e th is p r o ­

p o sa l to com bine the v a lu e s of a p p re n tic e sh ip w ith law schoo l ed ucation ,

I have often though t th a t one of the b e s t m e th o d s of in s tru c tio n fo r s tu d e n ts , p e rh a p s in th e ir l a s t y e a r a t the law schoo l, w ould be to tak e the c la s s in a body to the c o u r t-h o u s e , w here a d v o c a te s of e x p e r ie n c e w e re conducting a c tu a l t r i a l s , and then r e tu rn to the le c tu re ro o m and d is c u s s in d e ta il the t r ia l and th e w hys éind w h e re fo re s fo r e v e ry m ove m ad e b y counsel on e i th e r s id e .

Som e day p e rh a p s th is w ill be done,

In su m m a ry , the p r e r e q u is i te s of the s u c c e s s fu l a tto rn e y , a s

n am ed by the p ra c tic in g a d v o c a te s of th is p e r io d , a r e no t su b stan tia lly

changed f ro m those d is c u s s e d by C ice ro and o th e r c la s s ic a l rh e to r ic ia n s .

I t w as s t i l l ex pected th a t th e s tu d en t m u s t b r in g to h is p re p a ra tio n c e r ta in

n a tu ra l g if ts , w ithout vdiich he could n o t ex p ec t to su c ce e d and w hich

could no t be p ro v id e d b y the le a rn in g s itu a tio n . He w as expected to

a c q u ire b ro a d know ledge beyond a fu ll u n d e rs tan d in g of le g a l p r in c ip le s ,

and h e w as e n co u rag ed to m ak e an e x ten s iv e study of th e th e o ry of r h e to r ic

and o ra to ry and the o u ts tan d in g p ra c t i t io n e r s . F in a lly , i t w as u n iv e rsa lly

f e l t th a t th e fu ll d ev e lo p m en t of an ad vocate could n o t com e un til a f te r

long p r a c t ic e , n o t only a s an a s s i s ta n t b u t a lso in th e com ple te d ire c tio n

of a t r i a l .

L , W ellm an , og. c i t , , p , 101,

S, S te w a rt, og, c i t , , p , 5; F , L , W ellm an , og, c i t , , p , 102,

186

In te rv ie w s w ith a C lien t

T he la w y e r’s f i r s t a cq u a in tan ce w ith a cau se o r p ro b le m , and

h is p r im a r y in fo rm atio n about i t co m es fro m h is c lie n t. T h u s , th is

co m m u n ica tiv e s itu a tio n b e c o m e s a v e ry im p o rta n t p a r t of the rh e to r ic

of law . T h is v a lu e w as re c o g n iz e d by Q u in tilian w hen he sa id , "V ery

im p o rta n t a r e in te rv ie w s b e tw een law y er and l i t ig a n ts , fo r in such in t e r ­

v iew s the o r a to r w ill d isc o v e r the r e a l is s u e s . . . ," 1 6 The la w y e r-c lie n t

in te rv ie w i s th e re fo re an im p o r ta n t rh e to r ic a l ta s k fo r two re a so n s . In

the f i r s t p la c e , the obtaining of in fo rm a tio n w hich w ill u ltim a te ly fo rm

p a r t of a p e rs u a s iv e ap p ea l i s a tra d it io n a l function of the rh e to r ic a l

canon of Inven tion . Second, the v e ry a c t of ob ta in ing the in fo rm a tio n

th ro u g h com m unication b e tw een law y er and c lie n t in v o lv es rh e to r ic a l

th e o ry . The follow ing d is c u s s io n of p r a c t i t io n e r s ’ though ts on the i n te r ­

v iew w ill s tro n g ly suggest th e ir concep tion of the u n d e rly in g rh e to r ic a l

th eo ry .

T he m a jo r d iv is io n s of in te r e s t w ithin the in te rv ie w s itu a tio n a r e

f i r s t , the p ro b le m of getting the c lie n t into the o ffice and in a f ra m e of

m in d to say w hat he h as on h is m in d . N ext, i s the q u e s tio n of how the

law y er i s to o b ta in a ll the in fo rm a tio n he p o ss ib ly can d u rin g the in t e r ­

view ; th i rd , the law yer m u s t be co n ce rn ed w ith the ro le s he and the

^ ^ C h a rle s E d g a r L it t le ( tr a n s . and ed . ) Q u in tilian the School M a s te r The In stitu tio O ra to r ia of M arcu s F a b iu s Q u in tilin au s (2 V o ls . ; N a sh v ille ; F o r G eorge P eab o d y C ollege fo r T e a c h e rs , 1951), p . 322,

I

187

c lie n t p la y d u rin g the in te rv iew ; and f in a lly , th e re i s the q u es tio n of th e '

tim in g and freq u en cy of in te rv ie w s .

A ctually g e ttin g a c lie n t in to h is o ffice i s n o t u s u a lly a p ro b lem

fo r a l& yyer (u n le ss the law y er i s young and unknown), fo r the c lien t is

m oved to seek a s s is ta n c e f ro m an a tto rn e y b e ca u se of a re c o g n iz e d d iff i­

cu lty . P ro fe s s io n a l e th ic s c a re fu lly r e s t r i c t the la w y e r f ro m going out

to peop le and convincing th em they n e e d h is h e lp . H o w ev er, once the

c lie n t a r r iv e s i t m ay n o t be a s easy to s ta r t h im ta lk in g a s i t m ay seem .

The f i r s t co n fro n ta tio n be tw een la w y e r and c lie n t se em to b e c r u c ia l - - i t

i s im p o rta n t th a t the a tto rn e y co m m u n ica te an im p re s s io n of n a tu ra l ,

con fiden t, cap ab ility and n o t be in too b ig a h u r ry to d is c u s s h is fe e . If

a c lie n t h a s b een k ep t w aiting in the o u te r o ffice , the c o u n se lo r should

s tep ou t and e s c o r t h im in to the in n e r office r a th e r th an h av e the c lien t

s en t in to h im . The office i ts e lf should be a r ra n g e d in a m a n n e r condu­

c ive to c o n v e rsa tio n w ithou t being so co m fo rtab le th a t th e c lie n t re la x e s

17to the p o in t th a t h e fo rg e ts he i s in a b u s in e s s c o n fe re n c e .

Some c lie n ts a r e qu ite n e rv o u s and find i t d iff ic u lt to beg in to ta lk

abou t th e i r p ro b le m . In th is ca se i t m ay be n e c e s s a ry fo r the a tto rn e y to

tak e th e in itia tiv e and say w hat m ay be n e c e s s a ry to s e t the p e rso n a t

18e a s e . I t should be sa id p a re n th e tic a lly th a t none of th e w r i te r s exam ined

S. S tew art, og. c i t . , p . 18. ^^I b id . , p . 19.

188

devo ted m uch a tte n tio n to the type of co m m en ts th a t m ig h t s e rv e to s e t

c l ie n ts a t e a s e . One w ent only so f a r a s to su g g est such q u es tio n s a s

th e se :: "Now, w hat is y ou r tro u b le ? Now, how can we he lp you?

F o r o th e r c l ie n ts , i t i s n e c e s s a ry only fo r the law y er to s it b ack and

l is te n .

O nce the in te rv ie w h a s begun , the u ltim a te p u rp o se is to d raw f ro m

the c lie n t e v e ry p o ss ib le b i t of in fo rm a tio n - - th is o b jec tiv e is a g re e d upon

by a l l the w r i te r s . The th e o ry of how th is goal is to b e acco m p lish e d

se e m s a lso to be u n iv e rsa lly adop ted . If th e re a r e to b e in s tru c tio n s a s

to the te llin g of the s to ry o r s tru c tu r in g of the in te rv ie w in any w ay, th is

should be done a t f i r s t . Once the c lie n t h a s begun ta lk in g , he should no t

b e in te r ru p te d fo r such th in g s . H ard w ick e , in w ritin g about The A r t

of W inning C a s e s , r e c a l ls th a t C ic e ro in s is te d upon ta lk in g a t fu ll len g th

w ith e v e ry c lie n t who co n su lted h im , and m ad e su re th a t no o th e r p e rs o n

w as p r e s e n t o r th a t any o th e r d is tra c t io n cou ld a r i s e to h a m p e r the

te llin g of the s to ry . ^

D uring the in te rv ie w , i t i s im p o r ta n t th a t the la w y e r no t le a d the

w itn e ss o r m ak e su g g estio n s a s to the re la t io n of fa c ts to r e c e n t d e c is io n s .

The c lie n t m u s t be p e rm it te d to te l l the s to ry , p r e s e n t h is a rg u m e n ts ,

ex p la in why he ought to win the c a se in h is own w ay. " . . . The la y m a n 's

19lbid.

John C. R eed , Conduct of L a w su its (Boston: L i t t le , B row n , and C om pany, 1912), p . 38.

2 iR e n ry H ard w ick e , o£. c i t . , p . 33.

189

c o m m o n -sen se v iew of h is own c a se i s o ften b e t te r than any le g a l opinion

on the subject» E v en if the c lie n t in s i s t s upon in q u irin g abou t the

le g a l a p p lic a tio n s to h is c a s e , he should b e p u t off fo r th e t im e . E v en a s

the law y er h e a r s the s to ry and b e c o m e s c o n c e rn e d w ith w hat he i s h e a r in g

in t e r m s of the r u le s of ev idence and the v a lu e of som e of the in fo rm a tio n

2 3being g iven , he shou ld r e s i s t any in te r ru p t io n to c o r re c t o r m od ify .

If the c a se is a c r im in a l one, the a tto rn e y m u s t n o t sco ld the

c lie n t o r m ake a p a r t ic u la r po in t to in s i s t upon the tru th . The c lie n t

should b e a sk e d s im p ly w hat i t i s the p o lic e a c c u se h im of, and then he

should be a llow ed to te l l h is b to ry , t ru e o r f a ls e , w ithout in te r ru p tio n o r

in te rp re ta t io n by the co u n se lo r. If the s to ry i s no t t ru e , i t w ill b e d i s ­

co v e re d by check ing w ith o th e r s o u rc e s of in fo rm a tio n ,^ ^

The law y e r m u s t c o n s tan tly give the im p re s s io n of -w illingness to

l is te n . He m u s t n o t h u r ry the s to ry a long although th e re se em to be

u n n e c e s sa ry d ig re s s io n s and u n lim ited , i r r e le v a n t d e ta il . M any a tto rn e y s

d isco u rag e a c lie n t f ro m the s ta r t by h av ing a c lu tte re d d e sk and an a i r

of b e in g v e ry b u sy . The c lie n t ta k e s th is a s a sign th a t th e re i s l im ite d

tim e fo r h im to te l l w hat he h as on h is m in d ,

22f , L , W ellm an, og. c i t , , p , 75 ,

23w , S, Stew art, og. c i t , , pp, 35 and 39,

2 4 lb id ,, p . 35, 2 5 ib id ., p. 29,

190

One w r i te r su m m a riz e d the th e o ry of the in te rv ie w by using the

w o rd s of Q uin tilian ; h is in tro d u c tio n to the quo ta tion w as th is ; "We now

ad d a quo ta tion f ro m Q u in tilian , w hich i s m o re d e ta ile d in i ts d ire c tio n s ,

and w hich re a d s a s if i t w e re w r itte n by an e x p e r ie n c e d counsel of o u r

t im e . . . . The co m m en ts of Q u in tilian com e f ro m h is In s titu te s of

O ra to ry , Book VIII:

L e t u s a llow p len ty of tim e . . . and a p la c e of in te rv ie w f re e f ro m in te r ru p tio n to th o se who sh a ll have o cc a s io n to c o n su lt u s , and le t u s e a rn e s t ly e x h o rt them to s ta te ev e ry p a r t ic u la r o ff-h an d , how ever v e rb o se ly o r h o w ev er f a r they m ay w ish to go back ; fo r i t i s le s s inconven ience to l is te n to w hat i s su p erflu o u s th an to be le f t ig n o ran t of w h at i s e s se n tia l . F re q u e n tly , to o , the o r a to r w ill find both th e e v il and the re m ed y in p a r t ic u la r s w hich to the c lie n t a p p e a re d to have no w eigh t on e ith e r side of the q u es tio n ,

W hile th e re i s no c le a r a g re e m e n t, i t g en e ra lly s e e m s reco m m en d ed th a t

th e above p ro c e s s take p la c e a t the f i r s t in te rv ie w b e tw een law y er and

c lie n t.

The in te rv ie w s w hich follow the f i r s t a r e eq u a lly im p o rta n t, and

a p p a re n tly none h a s sa id why b e t te r than Q u in tilian fo r two of the m o d ern

a u th o rs u se h is w o rd s (although only one p ro p e r ly g iv e s c re d it to Q u in ­

t i l ia n ) .

N o r should he b e co n ten t w ith h e a r in g only once: the c lien t should be r e q u ire d to re p e a t th e sam e th ings ag a in and again;

C, R eed , og. c i t . , p . 39.

27lb id . The s ig n ifican ce of th is quotation i s p r im a r i ly th a t R eed s e le c te d th is p a r t ic u la r p a s sa g e to quote in a m o d e rn book on advocacy . F o r the fu ll te x t of th is co m m en t by Q u in tilian , see L i t t le , og. c i t . , p p . 322-323.

191

no t only b e c a u se som e th in g s m ig h t have e sc a p e d h is m em o ry a t the f i r s t r e c i ta l , e sp e c ia lly if he b e , a s is o ften the c a s e , an i l l i t e r a te p e rso n ; b u t a ls o th a t we m ay see w h eth er he te l ls ex ac tly the sam e s to ry ; fo r m any s ta te w hat i s f a ls e , an d , a s if they w e re no t s ta ting th e i r c a s e , b u t p lead in g i t , a d d re s s th e m se lv e s n o t a s to an a d v o c a te , b u t a s to a judge .

T h u s, the a tto rn e y h as two g e n e ra l o b jec tiv es in h is ta lk s w ith h is c l ie n t-

he w ish es to l e a r n a s m uch a s p o s s ib le of the fa c ts of the com ing c a s e ,

and he w ish e s to le a rn a s m uch a s p o ss ib le of the v e ra c i ty of h is c lien t.

He seek s to ac c o m p lish th e se ends f i r s t by e s ta b lish in g an im ag e of

re c e p tiv ity and le ttin g the c lie n t ta lk fo r a s long a s he is w illing .

W hen the c lie n t h as f in a lly sa id a l l th a t co m es to h is m ind , the

co u n se lo r i s to tak e the in it ia t iv e and , by m e a n s of the tech n iq u es of the

c o u r tro o m , d raw even m o re in fo rm a tio n f ro m the c lie n t. T h u s , the

a tto rn e y p ro c e e d s to t ry the c a s e in h is o ffice; he w ill engage in d ire c t

ex am in a tio n and c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of h is c lie n t, he w ill a s su m e the

ro le of the opponent and ch a llen g e p ro o f a t e v e ry p o ss ib le p o in t, he w ill

s e a rc h and p ro b e h is c lie n t u n til he is s a tis f ie d th a t he h a s le a rn e d a ll

he p o ss ib ly can . O ften , he w ill d isc o v e r th a t the c lie n t h a s no r e a l

c a se and p u t a stop to the p ro c e e d in g s a t once . O th er t im e s i t m ay be

d isc o v e re d th a t th e p a r ty who is to be sued h a s no m oney to pay dam ages

J , C. R eed , c i t . , p . 39; H ard w ick e , o£. c i t . , p . 9. H a rd ­w icke u s e s e s s e n tia lly the sam e w o rd s b u t g iv es no c r e d i t to Q u in tilian , F o r the L a tin te x t f ro m Q u in tilian , see L i t t le , op. c i t . , pp . 322-323.

^^H en ry H ard w ick e , og, c i t . , p . 3.

192

even if the c o u r t d ec id es a g a in s t h im . A fu r th e r b e n e f it of c r o s s -

e x am in a tio n of the c lie n t in the a t to rn e y ’s office i s th e avo idance of

s u rp r is e a t the t r i a l . If the law y er a s k s the q u e s tio n s of the c lien t w hich

m ay b e ex p ec ted f ro m the opponent, the c lie n t’s a n s w e rs w ill be h e a rd

fo r the f i r s t tim e in a s itu a tio n allow ing fo r c o r re c t io n and p lanning.

The u n ex p ec ted an sw er in the c o u rtro o m can be fa ta l to a c a se .

C le a r ly , the p ro b le m s of m o s t c lie n ts can be d e a lt w ith sh o rt of

going to co u rt; the ta s k of the a tto rn e y i s to d isc o v e r w hat the law can

te l l ab o u t the p a r t ic u la r p ro b le m , app ly h is own ju d g m e n t, and com e

fo r th w ith an opinion a s to the b e s t way of ap p ro ach in g the p ro b le m . The

co m m u n ica tio n ta sk co m es in b rin g in g c lie n t and op in ion to g e th e r - - th a t

i s , the c lie n t m u s t bo th u n d e rs ta n d w hat the a tto rn e y sa y s and be w illing

to fo llow h is ad v ice . A com m on p ro b le m to la w y e rs i s getting c lie n ts to

tak e th e i r ad v ice . So m any peop le w an t to m ake d e c is io n s fo r th e m se lv e s ,

they fin d i t d iff icu lt, p a r t ic u la r ly in the ca se of young la w y e rs , to tak e

the ad v ice of a n o th e r , T h is p r e s e n ts an unusual p ro b le m in p e rsu a s io n

to the c o u n se lo r: h is f i r s t re sp o n s ib ili ty i s to se rv e th e b e s t in te re s ts

of h is c lie n t, b u t i t i s no t a lw ays c le a r to w hat ex ten t th a t re sp o n s ib ili ty

d em an d s th a t the a tto rn e y in s is t th a t h is opinion i s in the c l ie n t 's b e s t

S. S tew art, o£. c i t . , p . 34.

^^I b id . , p . 38. ^ ^ Ib id ., pp. 36-37 .

193

i n t e r e s t s . The q u es tio n m a y be th is ; to w hat l im its and by w hat m ean s

shou ld th e a tto rn e y seek to convince h is c lie n t to fo llow h is adv ice? T he

l i t e r a tu r e of the p r a c t i t io n e r s does no t re a l ly a d d re s s i t s e l f to th is

q u es tio n ; i t s e e m s to a s su m e only th a t the la w y e r 's ad v ice should a lw ay s

be ta k e n .

In a r e c e n t study of the p o ten tia l co m m u n ica tio n p ro b le m s w hich

m ay a r i s e b e tw een a tto rn e y and c lien t som e in s ig h t w as g a ined into th is

s itu a tio n , In a r e p re s e n ta t iv e sam ple of la w y e rs in th e Chicago a r e a ,

a q u e s tio n n a ire a sk ed the a t to rn e y s to in d ic a te th e p o s s ib le so u rc e s of

co m m u n ica tio n b reak d o w n s. In the o r a l co m m u n ica tio n f ro m law y er to

c l ie n t , th e a tto rn e y s re p o r te d a b e lie f th a t a " la c k of t im e to go over

id e a s th o ro u g h ly , " and "em o tio n a l p ro b le m s of the c l ie n t w hich p re v e n t

c a re fu l l is te n in g and c le a r th in k in g , " w e re the ch ie f p ro b le m a r e a s ,

T he m o s t s e r io u s co m m u n ica tio n p ro b le m s in w r itte n com m unication

w e re "m isco n c e p tio n s of the c lie n t abou t the p o in ts y o u 'r e m ak ing" and

' 'u n fa m ilia r i ty of c lie n t w ith y o u r te rm in o lo g y ,

In a m o re sp ec ific a n a ly s is of the b a r r i e r s , th e follow ing l i s t w as

d ev e lo p ed . F i r s t , an o v e r - a l l d is tu rb e d em o tio n a l s ta te of the c lien t

a c ts a s a b a r r i e r to co m m u n ica tio n b e tw een h is la w y e r and h im se lf;

W ayne N, T hom pson and S, Jo h n In s a la ta , "C om m unication f ro m A tto rn e y to C lien t, " T he Jo u rn a l of C o m m u n ica tio n , XIV (M arch , 1964), pp , 22 -3 3 ,

3 3 lb id ,, p , 24, ^ % i d , , pp , 24 -2 5 ,

194

seco n d , em o tio n a l b lo c k s on a p a r t ic u la r p o in t m ay a r i s e . A m ong such

b lo ck s w as l i s te d se lf -d e c e p tio n , fee lin g s of g u ilt, and d e s ir e fo r s ta tu s .

T h ird , p re c o n c e iv e d n o tio n s b locked co m m unica tion . An exam ple of

th is w ould be a p r e -e s ta b l is h e d id e a on the n a tu re of the p ro b le m

in v o lv ed o r an e x a g g e ra te d idea of the m e r i t of a c a s e . F o u r th , d iv e r ­

g en t v iew s a s to the ro le of the a tto rn e y w ere d isc o v e re d .

W h ereas the a t to rn e y v isu a liz e d h im se lf a s a qua s i- ju d ic ia l a d v ic e -g iv e r who i s se rv in g so c ie ty by function ing a s an e x te n s io n of th e c o u r t s y s te m , the c l ie n t v iew s h im a s an ad v o ca te o r a p a r t i s a n w hose job is to ’f ig u re a w ay ou t' w ith ­o u t r e g a rd to w hat i s r ig h t and re a so n a b le . The r e s u l t of th is d iv e rg en c y i s th a t th e f ra m e of re fe re n c e w hich the c lie n t a p p lie s to w hat he h e a r s is n o t the sam e a s th a t w hich the a tto rn e y a p p lie s to w h at he is saying .

A f u r th e r p ro b le m in the a r e a of u n d e rs tan d in g of ro le s is a ten d en cy fo r

a c lie n t to o v e rs im p lify the w ork of an a tto rn e y . It i s com m on to v iew

the law a s p r e c is e and p re d ic ta b le . T h is le a v e s the c lie n t u n p re p a re d

to l i s te n to th e co m p lex d isc u s s io n of p ro b a b ili t ie s and ap p ro a ch es w hich

the a t to rn e y p r e s e n ts . A fifth b a r r i e r found w as an in ad eq u ate r e in fo r c e ­

m e n t and in su ff ic ie n t t im e fo r g ra sp in g th o u g h ts . In lig h t of th e

c o m p le x itie s of the law , th e p rev a len ce of em otioned p ro b le m s w hich

ten d to in te r f e r e w ith decod ing , and the eco n o m ics of the A m e ric a n le g a l

s y s te m , th is i s a p a r t ic u la r ly s e v e re b a r r i e r . B ec au se an a tto rn e y m u s t

3 5 ib id ., p . 27.

195

e i th e r c h a rg e a v e ry h igh fee o r keep m any c lie n ts u n d e r h is c a r e ,

th e re is r a r e ly tim e fo r an adequate co n fe ren ce b e tw een la w y e r and

c lie n t. The s ix th b a r r i e r d isc o v e re d w as in a c c u ra te and inadequate

r e f e r e n t ia l m e a n in g s . Q u ite s im p ly , c lie n ts often do n o t u n d e rs ta n d

le g a l te rm in o lo g y .^ ^ T h e se w e re the ch ie f co m m u n ica tio n p ro b le m s

found in the C hicago study.

The P re p a ra t io n of P lea d in g s

If the p ro b le m of a c l ie n t i s to r e q u ire ap p ea l to the ju d ic ia l s y s ­

te m , i t i s n e c e s s a ry to p r e s e n t to the p ro p e r a u th o r it ie s a fo rm a l

s ta te m e n t of the p ro b le m and th e sp ec ific q u es tio n s th a t d iv ide the

p a r t ie s to the su it. "P le ad in g i s th a t b ra n c h of le g a l s c ie n c e w hich d ea ls

w ith the p r in c ip le s go v ern in g the fo rm a l w r itte n s ta te m e n ts m ade to the

c o u r t by the p a r t ie s to a su it of th e ir re sp e c tiv e c la im s and d e fen ses a s

to the su it. B efo re any d isp u te can be dec ided i t i s n e c e s s a ry to

d e te rm in e the issu es* T h is can be done in v a r io u s w ay s such a s the

d i r e c t q u estio n in g of the p a r t ie s c o n ce rn ed by the judge o r by the exchange

of w r itte n s ta te m e n ts in advance of a d ir e c t h e a r in g of th e p a r t ie s .

"U n d er o u r A n g lo -A m eric an sy s te m of le g a l p ro c e d u re we a r e co m m itted

by t ra d it io n an d , . . , p ro b a b ly , by g e n e ra l in c lin a tio n , ex c ep t in

^^Ib id . The e n tire l i s t of co m m u n ica tio n b a r r i e r s a p p e a rs on pp . 25 -2 8 .

C h a r le s E . C la rk , H andbook of the Law of Code P le ad in g (St. P a u l , M inneso ta : W est P u b lish in g C o ., 1947, 2d ed . ), p . 1.

196

ex cep tio n a l c a s e s , to the la t te r m eth o d . In th e e a r ly p e r io d of le g a l

d ev e lo p m en t, p lead in g w as done o ra l ly , b u t fo r s e v e ra l h u n d red y e a r s

the p ra c t ic e of exchanging w r i t te n , te c h n ic a l le g a l docum ents h a s b een

39accep ted .

I t i s in the p lead in g s th a t the th e o r ie s of the p r a c t i t io n e r s ten d to

b eg in th e ir c la s h w ith the le g a l p h ilo so p h e rs , fo r i t is h e re th a t the dual

ro le of o ff ic e r of the c o u r t and ad v o ca te fo r a c l ie n t’s cau se f i r s t com e

in to co n flic t. The function of th e p lea d in g s a s a p a r t of the ju d ic ia l

p ro c e s s is to c la r ify the c o n tro v e rs y so a s to m ak e the u ltim a te d e c is io n

r e s t upon the a c tu a l p o in ts in c o n flic t and no t upon ir r e le v a n c ie s . The

th e o ry i s , th e r e fo re , th a t the d e c is io n w ill b e m o re ra tio n a l to the ex ten t

th a t the p r e c is e is s u e s of the c a s e a r e s e t out b e fo re the s ta r t of th e t r i a l .

H o w ev er, the th e o ry of the p ra c t i t io n e r i s not a lw ays in a c c o rd

w ith th is o b je c t. In the f i r s t p la c e , the a tto rn e y is co n ce rn ed w ith s e t ­

ting out the is s u e s in such a w ay a s to enhance the lik e lih o o d of the judge

o r ju ry dec id in g w ith h is s id e . T h e re fo re , he reco m m en d s th a t th e

is s u e s should n o t s ta te h is c a se in fu ll fo r f e a r th a t in the a c tu a l t r i a l he

m ay fa ll s h o r t of th a t goal and b e judged m o re h a rs h ly a s a r e s u l t . I t

w ould be b e t t e r , he re a s o n s , fo r the c o u r t to b e p le a sa n tly s u rp r is e d th a t

he i s p ro v in g m o re than he sa id h e w ould than to be d isap p o in ted in h is

fa i lu re to com e up to ex p ecta tio n s.^®

3 8 lb id ,, p . 2, 39ibid .

A lex an d e r H , R obb ins, A T re a t is e on A m e ric a n A dvocacy (St, L o u is : C e n tr a l L aw Jo u rn a l C om pany , 1913), p , 44,

197

Second, th e a tto rn e y is in co m p e titio n w ith an o th e r a tto rn e y and

each is d e s iro u s of gain ing an u p p e r h an d a t th e v e ry s ta r t of l i t ig a tio n .

T h u s , th e la w y e r i s cau tio n ed no t to d is c u s s h is p ro p o sed p ro o fs w ith

h is opponent and n o t to p o in t out any e r r o r s o r w ea k n esse s a t the tim e of

p lead in g s fo r f e a r the opponent w ill h av e tim e to c o r r e c t th em b e fo re the

tim e of t r i a l . ^

T h u s , a c u r io u s d icho tom y is d is c o v e re d in th is p hase of the

ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s ; one w hich w ill o c c u r th ro u g h o u t. T he ju d ic ia l sy s te m

is s e t up to e n fo rc e a p r o c e s s of r a t io n a l decision-m éik ing and in c lu d e s ,

a s one e s s e n t ia l , the s tep of c le a r ly s ta tin g the p o in ts of d iffe re n c e w hich

b r in g the p a r t ie s to the c o u r t. H o w ev er, the ju d ic ia l sy s tem a lso em p lo y s

the a d v e r s a ry m eth o d w hich ten d s to le a d the ad v o ca te s to d e s ir e th a t the

e x a c t n a tu re of the co n flic t re m a in co n fu sed o r only p a r t ly re v e a le d u n til

the l a s t p o ss ib le m in u te . The le g a l p r o c e s s s e e m s to b e fo s te r in g two

opposing rh e to r ic a l th e o r ie s .

G a th e rin g and A rra n g in g E v id en c e B e fo re T r ia l

P ra c t ic in g t r i a l la w y e rs u n an im o u sly u rg e ex ten siv e p re p a ra t io n

b e fo re the s t a r t of c o u r t w ork . In the f re q u e n t c r i t ic is m s of the w ay in

w hich li t ig a tio n i s h a n d led in c o u r ts , la c k of ad eq u a te p re p a ra tio n i s c ite d

S. S te w a rt, o£. c i t . , p . 84.

198

a s one of the m o s t ou tstand ing e r r o r s . 42 It i s on th is b a s is , a s w ell a s

o th e r s , th a t th e re have b een f re q u e n t c a lls fo r an a r e a of sp e c ia liz a tio n

am ong a tto rn e y s who engage ex c lu s iv e ly in t r i a l w ork , 43 The th e o re tic a l

a s su m p tio n of litig a tio n u n d er the a d v e r s a ry sy s tem is th a t two equally

sk illed ad v o ca te s who a re equally in fo rm ed of the c a se a t hand a r e m o re

lik e ly to expose the n e c e s s a ry in g re d ie n ts of a ra tio n a l d e c is io n than any

o th e r p ro c e d u re . C le a r ly , if one of the ad v o ca tes f a i ls to p r e p a re h im ­

se lf a s ex te n s iv e ly a s p o s s ib le , the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s te n d s to b e f ru s tr a te d .

If, fo r ex am p le , one a d v e rs a ry u n d e re s tim a te s the s tre n g th of h is oppo­

n en t, and p r e p a re s acco rd in g ly , the re su ltin g d ec is io n is lik e ly to be

a ffec ted , 44

The d e s ir e of the le g a l p ro c e s s to avoid the b a s in g of i t s d e c is io n s

on the p e r s o n a l i t ie s of the ad v o ca tes i s g e n e ra lly accep ted ,45 The fo l­

low ing s ta te m e n t by a p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y c le a r ly a r t ic u la te s the th eo ry

th a t in a c o n te s t betw een the n o n - ra tio n a l d e s ir e on the p a r t of the judge

42]_,eonard B , S lo sso n , "T he N eed fo r T ra in in g in A dvocacy , " J o u rn a l of the A m e ric an J u d ic a tu re S ocie ty , V ol. 16 (June, 1932), p , 83.

4 3 lb id ,, p, 84,

4 4 w a lte r P a r k e r S tacy , "T he L a w y er, H is C lien t and h is A d v e r- s a ry , " The N o rth C aro lin a L aw R ev iew , V ol. 4 (F e b ru a ry , 1926), p , 22,

45 ib id ,, p. 21,

199

o r ju r o r to r e je c t the p e r s o n of the ad vocate and the ra tio n a l d e s ir e to

a c c e p t the a d v o c a te 's a rg u m e n ts , the l a t t e r w ill be se le c te d .

L a w su its a r e n o t won in the c o u r t ro o m . P re p a ra t io n , in d u s try , a r e w hat count in the long ru n of the p ro fe s s io n .W itn esses m u s t b e in te r ro g a te d , p le a d in g s an a ly zed , c o n s id ­e ra tio n g iven to the o rd e r of p re s e n ta tio n of te s tim o n y , the law , then the f a c ts , m u s t be b r ie fe d . N othing m u s t be le f t undone. F o r i t m ay happen th a t th e re a r e s ittin g on the ju ry m en o r w om en to whom your p e rso n a li ty d o es not ap p ea l. If you know y o u r c a se you m ay o v e rco m e th a t te m p o ra ry h an d icap .B ut if you d o n 't know y o u r c a s e , you a r e lo s t .

An ad d itio n a l p o in t i s r a is e d w ith r e g a rd to p re p a ra t io n of c a s e s

b e fo re t r i a l . I t i s , only a sm a ll p e r cen t of the to ta l c a s e s e n te re d into

litig a tio n e v e r a c tu a lly com e to t r i a l . T he p o in t i s th e re fo re b ro u g h t up

th a t if the p ro b a b ili t ie s of the case n e v e r b e in g t r ie d a re v e ry h ig h , why

should the law y er spend tim e and m oney in e x ten s iv e p re p a ra tio n ? The

q u estio n is a n sw e re d by ex p e rie n c e d t r i a l la w y e rs to the e ffe c t th a t

n eg o tia tio n is a k ey fu n c tio n of the a tto rn e y . He is ex p ec ted to do h is

b e s t to p re v e n t a c a s e f ro m going a l l the w ay to the c o u rt fo r th is invo lves

g r e a t expense in tim e and m oney . T h e re fo re , a t ev e ry s tep the a tto rn e y

m u s t be p r e p a re d to e n te r into n e g o tia tio n s w ith h is o p p o n en t--b u t only

w ith the goal of se c u rin g the m o s t fa v o ra b le p o ss ib le se ttle m e n t fo r h is

c lie n t. The a tto rn e y m u s t be p re p a re d to m ak e a judgm ent a s to w hether

a g iven sum o ffe red in s e ttle m e n t, fo r ex a m p le , is b e t te r th an w hat he is

$ ^ A lb e rt H . M i l l e r , "A L a w y e r 's T re a tm e n t of h is C lien t, " A m e r­ic a n B a r A sso c ia tio n J o u rn a l , V ol. 13 (Ja n u a ry , 1927), p . 32.

200

lik e ly to o b ta in a s a ju d g m en t f ro m the c o u r t , tak ing in to acco u n t the

va lue of e a r ly se ttle m e n t. The a rg u m e n t of the p ra c t i t io n e r s is th a t

u n le s s a la w y e r i s fu lly p r e p a re d and re a d y to go into t r i a l he is not

re a d y to e n te r in to n eg o tia tio n s n o r can he m ak e a ju d g m en t a s to w hat

w ill happen should he end up in c o u rt,

N eg o tia tio n ty p ica lly o c c u rs d u rin g the tim e of p re p a ra t io n fo r

t r i a l , and i t c o n s titu te s the m eth o d fo r decid ing m o s t of the c a s e s th a t

a r i s e . C e r ta in ly m o re li tig a tio n is d ec id ed by the p ro c e s s of n eg o tia tio n

than by the ju d ic ia l sy s te m . W ith th is b e in g the c a s e , one w ould ex p ec t

th a t p r a c t i t io n e r s would have developed an ex ten s iv e th e o ry of le g a l neg o ­

tia tio n along w ith w e ll-d ev e lo p ed s y s te m s fo r c a r ry in g out the th e o ry .

H ow ever, th is does no t seem to be the c a s e . W ith the ex cep tio n of the

p rec e d in g d is c u s s io n of the va lue of p re p a ra t io n to n eg o tia tio n a s w e ll a s

som e m en tio n th a t la w y e rs known to be w eak t r i a l a tto rn e y s ten d to be

le s s e ffec tiv e in n eg o tia tio n b e ca u se th ey la c k the pow er to th re a te n con­

tin u ed c o u r t a c tio n , th e re i s a lm o s t no d isc u s s io n by p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s

of the p ro c e s s of n eg o tia tio n .

To p ro c e e d m o re sp ec ific a lly in to the s te p s of p re p a ra t io n su g ­

g es te d by the p r a c t i t io n e r s , the p r im a r y m ea n s of in fo rm a tio n -g a th e rin g

is by in te rv ie w . The in te rv ie w w ith the c lie n t h a s a lre a d y b een d isc u s s e d ,

^^W , S, S tew art, o£, c i t , , pp . 120-122,

201

In te rv ie w s w ith ad d itio n a l p o te n tia l w itn e s s e s p o se ad d itio n a l p ro b le m s .

The p ro b le m i s sp e c if ic a lly one of seek in g the g re a te s t p o s s ib le am o u n t

of re lia b le in fo rm a tio n th ro u g h the re c o lle c tio n of a p e rso n w ith f i r s t ­

hand in v o lv em en t in the c a se b u t who m ay h av e no d e s ir e to c o o p e ra te in

the litig a tio n . T h a t i s , the p o ten tia l w itn e ss could be p laced a t som e

p o in t along a continuum ran g in g fro m a c tiv e d e s ire to help the c l ie n t w in

the ca se th rough le th a rg y to an open h o s ti l i ty to w ard the cau se of one

p a r t ic ip a n t. Not only do es a fee lin g to w a rd the li t ig a n ts in flu en ce the

b eh av io r of w itn e s s e s b u t a lso a g e n e ra l d is in c lin a tio n to tak e p a r t in

le g a l m a t te r s ten d s to d isc o u ra g e c o o p e ra tio n w ith a t r i a l a tto rn ey .^ ®

U nder th e se c i r c u m s ta n c e s , the p ra c t i t io n e r s have d ev elo p ed upon

the b a s ic th eo ry of in te rv ie w e x p re s s e d e a r l i e r in th is sec tio n . T h a t

th e o ry w a s , i t w ill be r e c a l le d , th a t th e in d iv id u a l w ill tend to p r e s e n t

the m o s ^ a c c u ra te p o s s ib le acco u n t of w hat he know s if he i s p e rm it te d

to te l l the s to ry in h is own w o rd s in a s itu a tio n a s u n s tru c tu re d b y the

in te rv ie w e r a s p o s s ib le , b ecau se the in te rv ie w e r , n o t be ing a w a re of

w hat in fo rm a tio n is a v a ila b le , m ay a c tu a lly s u p p re s s som e of i t in h is

a tte m p t to o rg an ize the re c ita t io n . H o w ev er, in th is ca se the la w y e r i s

no t dea ling w ith a c l ie n t who is h ig h ly m o tiv a te d to help the c a se ach iev e

s u c c e s s . T h u s, th e f i r s t s tep w hich m u s t b e tak en b y the a t to rn e y w ith

r e g a rd to the w itn e ss in te rv ie w i s to d is c o v e r w hat fa c ts a r e av a ila b le

^®Ibid., p . 94.

202

re le v a n t to the a ttitu d e of the p o te n tia l w itn e ss to w ard the c a s e . I t i s

th u s a ssu m e d th a t know ledge of h o s til i ty on the p a r t of the w itn e ss w ill

p e r m it the law y er to a d ju s t h is ap p ro ach so a s to obtain m ax im um

4 9in fo rm a tio n . I t is su g g ested by one p ra c t i t io n e r th a t an ap p ea l to the

c au se of ju s t ic e m ay o v erco m e an u n w illin g n ess to d isc u ss a c a se w ith

the law y er.

A n e c e s s a ry p a r t of the rh e to r ic a l th e o ry of the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s

i s invo lved w ith the f re e d o m of opposing a tto rn e y s to d isco v e r the

m a te r ia ls w hich th e ir opponent in ten d s to u se a g a in s t them . T h a t is to

say , a s long a s d ebate i s c o n s id e re d a c o n te s t o r gam e in the sam e sen se

w a r i s , the e le m en t of s u rp r is e i s a va lu ab le w eapon. The m ytho logy of

law in c lu d es re g u la r ly the s itu a tio n in w hich a lo s t cause i s saved a t the

l a s t m inu te by the un ex p ec ted a p p ea ran ce of a s u rp r is e w itn ess w hose

te s tim o n y th ro w s the o pposition off b a lan ce an d sw eeps th rough th e

im ag in a tio n of the ju ry . The p ro b le m th is p o s e s to the ju d ic ia l sy s te m

is th a t u n d er such c irc u m s ta n c e s i t seem s lik e ly th a t the d ec is io n i s m o re

n e a r ly the p ro d u c t of n o n -ra tio n a l s tim u li. T h a t i s , in the f i r s t p la c e

th e re is an a s su m e d s tre n g th p sy ch o lo g ica lly in the influence such a s u r ­

p r i s e h as upon a judge o r ju ry . In the second p la c e , if i t i s a tru e

s u rp r is e the opposition w ill n o t have h ad tim e to study the te s tim o n y and

^ % id ., pp. 94-95. SOjbid.

203

p re p a re to co u n te ra c t i ts im p a c t. T hus the re su ltin g d e c is io n m ay give

m o re w eig h t to the te s tim o n y than w ould have b een the c a se had th e re

b een no s u rp r is e .

If th e th eo ry of the v a lu e of s u rp r is e is a c c e p te d , then i t is to be

ex p ec ted th a t opposing a tto rn e y s w ould seek to d isc o v e r a s m uch as

p o ss ib le of the p ro o fs to be u se d by the o th e r side w hile a t the sam e tim e

guard ing c a re fu lly th e ir own p ro o fs . T h u s, one of the p re su m e d v a lu es

of the a d v e r s a ry sy stem of ju d ic ia l d ec is io n -m ak in g is th a t the opponents

a re m o re lik e ly to d isc o v e r a l l re le v a n t in fo rm a tio n and avo id s u rp r is e s

m o re e ffec tiv e ly than w ould b e done in an o th e r sy s te m . To give e n co u r­

ag em en t to th is o b jec t, the law in m o s t of the U nited S ta te s p ro v id e s fo r

the ex te n s iv e in te rv iew in g by one a tto rn e y of the c lie n t and p o ten tia l

w itn e s se s of the o th e r a tto rn e y . T h is i s fe l t by p ra c tic in g t r i a l law y ers

to be a v a lu ab le add ition to th e p re p a ra t io n fo r t r i a l ,

The n ex t step in p re p a ra t io n fo r t r i a l in v o lv es w hat i s ca lled the

o rg a n iz a tio n of a th e o ry of th e c a s e . O nce th e law y er h a s g a th e red

to g e th e r the in fo rm atio n a v a ila b le (and i t should no t be a s su m e d th a t

b e c a u se th is study h a s d is c u s s e d only in te rv iew in g of w itn e s s e s th e re is

no o th e r so u rc e of in fo rm a tio n ), i t is n e c e s s a ry to d e te rm in e how i t w ill

b e p u t to g e th e r to fo rm an a rg u m en ta tiv e c a s e . The d e c is io n b e fo re the

a tto rn e y i s the one of se le c tin g th e c o u rse of a c t io n - - th e em p h as is and

L , W ellm an, c i t , , p , 92,

204

n a tu re of p ro o f—m o s t lik e ly to w in the c a s e . A s th is s tep is no t d isc u s se d

fu lly by p r a c t i t io n e r s in te r m s of sp ec ific th e o ry b u t r a th e r s e e m s to r e s t

upon the in tu itio n of the law y e r in the c a s e , som e i l lu s t r a t io n is n e c e s s a ry

to ex p la in w hat i s m e a n t. In any p a r t ic u la r c a se th e re a re lik e ly to be

s e v e ra l p o te n tia l i s s u e s a ro u n d w hich the c o n tro v e rs y m ig h t m o v e . In a

m u rd e r c a s e , fo r ex a m p le , th e key q u es tio n m ig h t be th e c irc u m s ta n c e s

a ro u n d w hich the d ea th o c c u r re d th u s in q u irin g w h e th e r the d ea th w as a

p re m e d ita te d k illin g o r n o t. On th e o th e r hand , the q u es tio n of the san ity

of the a lle g e d k i l le r m ig h t be the c e n tra l is s u e . I t i s u ltim a te ly tiie

d e c is io n of the a tto rn e y s in v o lv ed w h e th e r the f i r s t , the second , b o th , o r

an o th e r is s u e b e c o m e s th e tu rn in g p o in t of the c a s e . T h e ir d e c is io n m u s t

b e m ad e on the b a s is of w hich cho ice w ill p ro d u ce the s tro n g e s t p ro b a ­

b ility of v ic to ry . T h u s , the d e fen se a tto rn e y m ig h t choose to c e n te r h is

e n tire a tte n tio n on the q u es tio n of san ity ig n o rin g a lto g e th e r the q u es tio n

of p re m e d ita tio n , know ing th a t if he lo s e s tlie d e c is io n of the ju ry h is

c lie n t w ill d ie bu t if he w ins th e c lie n t goes f r e e . On the o th e r hand , the

q u es tio n of p re m e d ita tio n m ig h t be e a s ie r to w in th e ju ry w ith , b u t r e g a r d ­

le s s of th e d e c is io n , the c l ie n t m u s t go to j a i l an d he m ig h t be ex ecu ted .

The d e c is io n , to b e s u re , i s b a s e d to som e e x ten t upon the la w y e r 's

ju d g m en t of w hat the law i s p re s u m e d to say upon the g iven s e t of f a c ts ,

S. S tew art, o£ . c i t . , pp . 101-102; 107. See a lso J . C.R eed , og. c i t . , pp . 53; 149; 157-159.

205

b u t the law is am biguous and could conceivab ly su p p o rt e ith e r p o s itio n .

T h u s , the la w y e r f in a lly m u s t dec ide w hat p ro o f w ill p roduce w h at e ffec t

upon the judge o r ju ry . T h is is c le a r ly a r h e to r ic a l d ec is ion .

The w ritin g s of th e p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s r e g u la r ly in d ica te th a t

such a d e c is io n m u s t be m a d e . They fu r th e r in d ic a te th a t it i s qu ite

p o s s ib le th a t the c a se m ay b e won o r lo s t on the s tre n g th of th is ty p e ofC O

d e c is io n by the la w y e r . B ut the p r a c t i t io n e r s have l i t t le to say r e g a r d ­

ing the th e o ry o r m eth o d to be ap p lied . They re c o g n iz e th a t i t i s n e c e s s a ry

to be fu lly in fo rm e d and to study the p o te n tia l i s s u e s w ith c a r e , an d th en

to s e le c t the " s tro n g e s t" p o s itio n , Why one p o s itio n is s tro n g e r than

a n o th e r , o r how i t i s to be d e te rm in e d i s no t w e ll developed.

One ad d itio n a l a s p e c t of p re p a ra t io n fo r t r i a l should be d is c u s s e d

b e ca u se of i t s im p lic a tio n s to le g a l rh e to r ic : b e fo re pu tting w itn e s s e s

b e fo re the c o u r t an a tto rn e y is ex h o rted to co ach th em re g a rd in g th e i r

fo rth co m in g p e r fo rm a n c e , A foundation fo r th is can be la id by no ting the

e m p h a s is g iven in the c o u r t to the c re d ib ili ty of a w itn e ss in d e te rm in in g

f a c ts , and the im p o rta n c e p la ce d on the d e m ea n o r of the w itn ess in d e te r ­

m in ing c re d ib ili ty , John H, W igm ore , a r e s p e c te d sc h o la r of ju d ic ia l

p ro o f and ev id en ce , n o ted th re e fo re n s ic m e th o d s of d e te rm in in g the

53 W, S, S tew art, og. c i t , , p , 107,

C , R eed , op, c i t , , p , 162,

206

c re d ib ili ty of a w itn e s s , the f i r s t m en tioned w as the b eh av io r of the w it­

n e s s w hile speak ing to th e c o u r t .

The d a ta th a t m ay p o ss ib ly a ffe c t p ro b a tiv e value of t e s t i ­m o n ia l e v id en ce , v iz . the g e n e ric hum an t r a i t s , and the te s tim o n ia l e lem e n ts of p e rc e p tio n , re c o lle c tio n , and n a r ra t io n , have b e e n su rv ey ed in C h a p te rs XLX-XXIV. W hether any one o r m o re of th e m i s so p r e s e n t , in a g iven w itn e s s , i s the p ro ­b lem fo r the ad v o ca te and the judge . How d oes he get a t them , in t ra d it io n a l fo re n s ic p ra c t ic e ?

(a) Some of the m o re p e rc e iv a b le by au to p tic p re fe re n c e . . . i . e . f ro m the d e m e a n o r of the w itn e ss d u ring te s t im o n y -- a m e n ta l d e ra n g e m e n t, f ro m h is in c o h e re n t u t te ra n c e s , —a d e a fn e ss , f ro m h is f a i lu r e to h e a r q u e s tio n s , - - a n h o n e s t o r d ish o n e s t d isp o s itio n , f ro m h is ev a s iv e o r s tra ig h tfo rw a rd m ode of e a g re s s io n , - - a b ia s , f ro m h is in to n a tio n s o r h is fa c ia l m o v e m en ts .

T h e re fo re , i t can b e re a so n a b ly a ssu m e d th a t the b eh av io r of a w itn e ss

w hile te s tify in g i s a t l e a s t f e l t to be a s ig n ifican t f a c to r in judging c r e d i ­

b ili ty w h e th e r i t ac tu a lly e n te r s into the a c tu a l p ro c e s s o r no t, and

r e g a rd le s s of i t s a c tu a l e ffic a cy a s a c r i te r io n of c re d ib ili ty . F ollow ing

fro m th is p r e m is e , the p ra c t ic in g a tto rn e y th e o r iz e s th a t to the ex ten t he

can a s s u r e th a t h is w itn e s s e s behave in a m a n n e r designed to se c u re

b e lie f , to th a t ex ten t th ey w ill be b e liev ed by judge and ju ry . T h e re fo re ,

the law y e r ta k e s tim e in h is o f f ic e - -b e fo re the t r i a l - - to ta lk w ith a

w itn e ss abou t the com ing p e r fo rm a n c e . The w itn e ss m u st be e^diorted

to te l l the t ru th in a l l m a t t e r s g re a t and s m a ll , fo r th e re se em s to b e a

s tro n g tendency fo r w itn e s s e s to becom e co n sc io u s of the c o u r t s itu a tio n

^^John H en ry W ig m o re , The S cience of Ju d ic ia l P ro o f (3d ed , ;B oston: L it t le , B row n, an d Com pany, 1937), p . 721.

207

and b eco m e d e fe n s iv e . F o r ex a m p le , th e re i s a t r i c k th a t i s p lay ed by

one a tto rn e y ask in g a w itn ess if he h a s ta lk ed w ith the opposing a tto rn e y

about h is te s t im o n y - - th e w itn e ss know s he h a s so ta lk ed b u t is le a d to

b e liev e he should n o t have ta lk ed w ith the law y er and p ro c e e d s to lie and

say he h a s ta lk e d w ith no one. T he opposing a tto rn e y p o u n ces on th is

fa lseh o o d to su g g e s t th a t one lie m ay be a sign of o th e rs in the te s tim o n y

and th a t i t a l l should be d isb e lie v e d . T h is r e s u l t could have been p r e -

56ven ted by p ro p e r coaching of the w itn e s s . The d r e s s , the h e s ita n c y

o r a s s u ra n c e of a n sw e r , the f a c ia l e x p re s s io n , the p ro p e r em o tio n al

a ttitu d e to w ard a c ro s s -e x a m in in g a tto rn e y , a s w ell a s o th e r i te m s a re

su g g ested a s su itab le o b jec ts fo r p r io r coach ing fo r w itn e s s e s . Such

coaching i s of in te r e s t b ecau se of the rh e to r ic a l th e o ry i t im p lie s . F o r

the a tto rn e y to p r a c t ic e h is w itn e s s e s so th a t th e i r v e rb a l m e ssa g e and

n o n -v e rb a l m e s s a g e s of v o ca l tone and v isu a l cu es w ill b e c o n s is te n t is a

reco g n itio n of a b e lie f th a t the au d ien ce w ill ob ta in m ean ing f ro m a ll

th re e . T he le g a l sy s te m re c o g n iz e s th is and c a lls fo r th e ju ry o r judge

to d raw c o n c lu s io n s a s to the c re d ib ili ty of a w itn e ss on the b a s is of a ll

th re e co d es . H o w ever, the coach ing of w itn e s se s a lso su g g es ts a p o ss ib le

n o n -ra tio n a l in g re d ie n t. T h a t i s , to the ex ten t the law y er p r e p a re s h is

w itn e ss to co m m u n ica te cu es of c re d ib i li ty to the ju ry w hen none a re

S, S tew art, o£, c i t , , pp, 172-173,

208

w a rra n te d ; o r w hen he co ach es a w itn e ss to avo id cu es of n o n -c re d ib ili ty

w hich w ould o rd in a r i ly o c cu r in the w itn e s s , to th a t ex ten t he i s d isto rtin g

the a ssu m e d ra t io n a l co n tex t of the c o u r t a s m uch a s if he w e re to

in s tru c t the w itn e ss to te s t ify fa ls e ly . The ju d ic ia l sy s te m e la b o ra te ly

c o n tro ls the v e rb a l co n ten t of te s tim o n y , b u t p la c e s no b a r r i e r s to the

a d m iss io n of m e s s a g e s th ro u g h to n a l and v isu a l co d es .

W hile th e se fu n c tio n s e m p h a s iz e the im p o rta n c e of s tru c tu r in g a

le g a l c a s e , ev id en ce su g g e s ts th a t i t i s n o t a com m on p ra c t ic e in the

U nited S ta te s fo r t r i a l a t to rn e y s to p r e p a re fo rm a l t r i a l b r ie f s . T h is is

c o n tra s te d w ith the cu sto m in the U nited K ingdom in w hich a s o lic ito r

g e n e ra lly p r e p a r e s a co m p le te b r ie f so th a t the b a r r i s t e r who ev en tu a lly

m u s t a rg u e the c a se in c o u r t can b e in fo rm e d a s w ell a s p o ss ib le of the

m a te r ia ls of the p ro c e e d in g s . T h o se p ra c tic in g la w y e rs who w rite on

the su b jec t, h o w e v e r, tend to en co u rag e the p r a c t ic e of b r ie f w ritin g .

The p u rp o se of th e b r ie f is to o rg a n iz e a l l the m a te r ia ls to b e u se d in

p re se n tin g the c a s e to the c o u r t in the m o s t e ffec tiv e m an n e r p o s s ib le .

The a tto rn e y a im s a t se ttin g out the fa c ts c le a r ly and re la tin g th em to the

is s u e s e s ta b lis h e d in the p le a d in g s . I t i s in the b r ie f th a t the o rd e r of

p re se n tin g w itn e s s e s i s e s ta b lish e d . To i l lu s t r a te , a b r ie f fo r a c iv il

H en ry H ard w ick e , 0£ . c i t . , p . 12.

C . R ee d , o£. c i t . , p . 215.

209

a c tio n should in c lu d e (acco rd in g to a b o o k a u th o r iz e d by the A m e ric a n

L aw In s titu te and the A m e ric a n B a r A sso c ia tio n ) f i r s t a s ta te m e n t of the

a c tio n , o r such p ro c e d u ra l d a ta a s the type of su it and th e tim e of i ts

o r ig in a tio n . N ex t, a s ta te m e n t of f a c ts shou ld be in c lu d ed . P re s u m a b ly ,

th is sec tio n should co n ta in in fo rm a tio n --w h a t one side b e lie v e s to be

f a c t - - a n d should n o t b e a rg u m e n ta tiv e . H o w ev er, " , , , th e o r d e r in

w hich the fa c ts a r e to b e p re s e n te d i s a m a t te r of s tra te g y to be d ec id ed

d iffe re n tly in d iffe re n t c a s e s , T he f a c ts can be a r ra n g e d ch ro n o lo g i­

c a lly , o r in the o r d e r in w hich the c a s e i s to be p re s e n te d , o r in som e

o th e r w ay. The s ta te m e n t of fa c ts shou ld in c lu d e a c le a r in d ic a tio n of

w hat i s d e s ir e d f ro m th e c o u rt, F o llow ing the s ta te m e n t of f a c ts

should be a c le a r in d ica tio n of the i s s u e s a r is in g u n d er th e li t ig a tio n and

th en a sec tio n w ith the a tto rn e y ’s a rg u m e n t of the i s s u e s . In m an y c a s e s

i t i s n e c e s s a ry to in c lu d e a sec tio n s e ttin g fo r th the f a c ts r e la tin g to the

am oun t of dam age in v o lv e d -- lo s s e s due to im p a irm e n t of fu tu re ea rn in g

p o w er, a s c r ib e d v a lu e of pa in and s u ffe r in g , d is f ig u re m e n t, h u m ilia tio n ,

and lo s s of l i f e 's p le a s u re s , The f in a l s tep in the t r i a l b r ie f i s a

co n c lu sio n w hich p o in ts ou t the p re s e n c e of a l l the n e c e s s a ry and im p o r t­

a n t e le m e n ts of the c a se and the ju s t if ic a t io n fo r an ad eq u a te ly s u b s ta n tia l

a w a rd fo r the c lie n t,

5 9 w ilfo rd R . L o r r y , .A C iv il A c tio n - - The T r ia l , A m e r ic a n Law In s ti tu te and the A m e r ic a n B a r A s so c ia tio n (P h ilad e lp h ia : A . L aw In s titu te , O c to b e r , 1959), pp . 16-17,

6 0 ib id ,, p , 17. 6 l ib id . 62 ibid ,

210

T h e re a r e a s su m e d s tra te g ic c o n s id e ra tio n s involved in the

se le c tio n of the o rd e r of p re se n tin g w itn e s s e s . T hat i s , i t i s a s su m e d

th a t f a c to rs o th e r th an the con ten t of the te s tim o n y m ay o p e ra te on the

decision-m éik ing p r o c e s s , W ilford R , L o r ry , w ritin g in the a u th o r iz e d

v e r s io n , su g g es ts som e of the co n s id e ra tio n s .

In d e te rm in in g the o rd e r of appeareince of w itn e sse s , th e re a r e o th e r c o n s id e ra tio n s in add ition to the n a tu re of th e ir te s tim o n y . F o r in s ta n c e , the a p p ea ra n c e of the w itn ess w ill have a b e a r in g on the e ffec t of h is te s tim o n y ; h is ab ility to p r e s e n t fa c ts c le a r ly and in a p e rsu a s iv e fa sh io n m u s t be co n s id e red ; h is g e n e ra l in te llig en ce éind a b ility to handle the sk illfu l c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of opposing co u n se l m u st be w eighed so th a t h is e f fe c tiv e n e s s m ay n o t be d e s tro y e d and y o u r c a se w eakened by a d ra m a tic co llap se u n d er c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n .L ead f ro m s tre n g th so th a t the p ro p e r im p re s s io n w ill be m ad e w hile y o u r fa c t f in d e rs a r e s t i l l im p re s s io n a b le . J u r o r s a r e a v e ra g e hum an b e e in g s . They a r e su b jec t to fa tigue in the c o u rse of a long t r i a l , and a m onotonous p re se n ta tio n ten d s to du ll th e ir s e n s e s .

W ith r e g a rd to fa c tu a l a d m iss io n s e l ic i te d fro m your opponent, obv iously , i t w ould no t be d e s ira b le to r e a d into the re c o rd a d m iss io n s a t such an e a r ly stage of the c a se th a t the ju ry w ould n o t co m p reh en d the meeining of o r the e ffe c t of such a d m iss io n s and th e ir p u rp o r t w ould be e n tire ly lo s t ex cep t fo r the fa c t th a t you h ad th em on the r e c o rd . You m ig h t d eem i t m o re e ffec tiv e to o ffe r r e c o rd a d m iss io n s m ade by y o u r opponent follow ing the te s tim o n y of one of yo u r w eak er of le s s co lo rfu l w itn e sse s . I t m ig h t even be d e te rm in e d by you th a t a c e r ta in few a d m iss io n s m ig h t be w ithheld , if no t needed in the d i r e c t p re se n ta tio n of yo u r c a s e , fo r u se in c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of d efen d an t's w itn e s s e s o r even fo r re b u tta l upon the conclusion of the d e fen d an t's c a s e . N ev er save fo r rebutté il an e s s e n tia l p ie c e of ev idence n eed ed to e s ta b lis h a n e c e s s a ry e lem en t of y ou r c a s e in ch ief. You m a y n e v e r re a c h the p o in t w here you can f la sh th is s u rp r is e on o p p o s­ing co u n se l. C o m p le te ly e s ta b lis h y ou r c a se f i r s t .

^ ^ Ib id ., pp . 2 4 -2 5 .

211

W ith the co m p le tio n of the t r i a l b r ie f , an a tto rn e y h a s a t h and a

r e c o rd of the a v a ilab le m a te r ia ls he w ill u se in the c a s e , a r ra n g e d in

the o rd e r he h as d e te rm in e d b e s t fo r the p a r t ic u la r c irc u m s ta n c e s . The

n ex t s tep in the ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s h a s to do w ith the ju ry .

T he S e lec tio n of the J u ry

T r ia l by ju ry i s a r ig h t, no t a re sp o n s ib il i ty , and th e re fo re the

d e c is io n w h eth er o r no t to tak e a c a se to a ju ry r a th e r than only a judge

is a fa c to r in the d e c is io n -m a k in g p ro c e s s o v e r w hich each a tto rn e y h a s

som e c o n tro l. T h is d e c is io n , a s w ell a s the th e o ry of u ltim a te s e le c tio n

of th e ju ry ,, i s a s ig n if ic a n t rh e to r ic a l function in th a t i t in v o lv es a sp e a k e r

re la tin g h im se lf and h is su b je c t to the au d ien ce . I t fu r th e r in v o lv es an

a lm o s t unique rh e to r ic a l p r o c e s s of a sp e a k e r g iven the pow er to p a r t i ­

c ip a te in the s tru c tu r in g of h is a u d ien ce . An a tto rn e y h a s only l im ite d

c o n tro l in the sen se th a t one m ay d ecid e to tak e the c a se to a judge alone

b u t the opponent s t i l l m ay s e le c t a ju r y t r i a l . The d ec is io n is c le a r ly

b a s e d upon the q u e s tio n of w hich of the two a l te rn a t iv e s o ffe rs the

g r e a te r p ro b a b ility of a fa v o ra b le d e c is io n fo r the law y er m ak ing the

d ec is io n . T h is a s s u m e s a p o s s ib il i ty (in t ru th , a p ro b ab ility ) th a t the

sam e c a se when p re s e n te d to a judge s ittin g alone w ill p ro d u ce a d iffe re n t

d e c is io n th an when p re s e n te d to judge and ju ry . If th is i s the a ssu m p tio n

of la w y e rs , then w hat f a c to r s e n te r in to th e ir d ec is io n to p r e s e n t a c a se

to one a r b i t r a to r r a th e r than th e o th e r?

212

If i t i s know n w hat judge w ill h e a r the c a se , th en i t i s p o ss ib le to

study the p a s t ju d ic ia l b e h av io r of the judge and p re d ic t how he is like ly

to re sp o n d to the fo rth co m in g c a s e . O ver the y e a rs a judge co m es to

be rep u ted to fa v o r p la in tiffs o r d e fen d an ts , and th is can b e checked by

an ex am in atio n of the c o u r t r e c o rd s . M ost freq u en tly i t i s the defendant

who a s su m e s a fa v o ra b le a ttitu d e f ro m the judge . I t i s w idely h e ld th a t

in the c o u rse of y e a r s a judge w ill b eco m e cyn ica l and fre q u e n tly no t

v e ry to le ra n t of the fo ib le s , p e c u l ia r i t ie s , and w e ak n e sse s of hum an

b e in g s . The judge i s a s su m e d to be in flu en ced by h is en v iro n m e n t and

th e re fo re g e n e ra lly in c lin e d to w ard the va lue of p ro p e r ty and a b a s ic

c o n se rv a tism .

A judge is lik e ly to be p r e f e r r e d by a le s s e3q>erienced law y er

b e cau se the p ro c e e d in g s a r e m uch l e s s co m p lica ted , and i t is th e re fo re

le s s lik e ly th a t th e d e c is io n w ill be in flu en ced by in e x p e r ie n c e . I t i s a lso

a ssu m e d th a t a ju d g e i s m o re lik e ly to b a se the d ec is io n upon the fa c ts

and law of the c a s e r a th e r than a n o n -lo g ic a l re sp o n se to th e p e rso n a l

e ffec tiv en ess of in e ffe c tiv e n e ss of the co u n se l.

C o n v e rse ly , i t i s the p la in tiff who u su a lly ch o o ses a ju ry t r i a l .

The re a so n fo r th is r e s t s upon an a lm o s t u n iv e rsa l a s su m p tio n th a t a ju ry

^^H ubert H ick am and T hom as M . Scanlon, P r e p a ra t io n fo r T r ia l , Jo in t C om m ittee on C ontinuing L e g a l E d u ca tio n of the A m e ric a n L aw I n s t i ­tu te and the A m e ric a n B a r A sso c ia tio n (P h iladelph ia : A . L aw I n s t . , 1963),p . 288.

R . L o r r y , o£. c i t . , p . 30. ^% ick am and S can lon , op .c i t . , p .289 .

213

is m o re lik e ly th an a judge to d ecide on e m o tio n a l, sy m p a th e tic , o r

o th e rw ise i r r e le v a n t g ro u n d s. F o r e x a m p le , one w r i te r ex p la in s th a t

the p la in tiff c le a r ly h a s the m o re d iff icu lt ta s k in the t r i a l , fo r he h as

f i r s t the b u rd e n of p ro o f. T h a t i s , he m u s t convince a s tr a n g e r (or

s tra n g e rs ) th a t th ey " , . . should e n r ic h h im by tak in g m oney fro m

a n o th e r , and he m u s t do th is by a p re p o n d e ra n c e of the ev id en ce . "

T h is dem and fo r m oney is u su a lly b a s e d upon c irc u m s ta n c e s w hich o c c u r re d

m on ths o r even y e a r s ago , and the m ed iu m b y w hich the p la in tif f ’s a tto rn e y

m u s t co m m u n ica te the d ra m a and m e r i t of h is s ide of the c irc u m s ta n c e s

is u n tra in e d and fre q u e n tly f r ig h te n e d w itn e s s e s . A d d itio n a lly , the

w itn e s se s m u s t r e p o r t th e ir f i r s t - h a n d know ledge w ith in a co n tex t of

e la b o ra te r u le s w ith w hich th ey a r e u n fa m il ia r , and p ro b ab ly w h ile in a

s ta te of r e s e n tm e n t o v e r the in te r ru p tio n in th e ir o rd in a ry w ay of life ,

In the fa c e of th is d iff ic u lt ta s k , the p la in tif f ’s a tto rn e y i s expected

to seek any f a c to r w hich w ill ten d to w o rk in h is fa v o r and h e lp o v erco m e

the a s su m e d d isad v an tag e w ith w hich he b e g in s . C le a r ly , i t i s a s su m e d ,

w ith a judge a l l the dem an d s of b u rd e n of p ro o f and ru le s of ev id en ce and

p ro c e d u re w ill be e n fo rc e d upon the p la in tiff ; the ju ry , h o w ev er, is

exp ec ted to ta k e the hum an e le m e n t in to c o n s id e ra tio n . T h u s, th e one

lev e lin g fa c to r fo r the p la in tiff i s the a s su m e d sy m p a th e tic c o n s id e ra tio n

of tw elve le g a lly u n tra in e d c it iz e n s .

67W. R , L o r r y , og. c i t . , p . 30. ^^I b id . , p . 30. ^^Ib id .

214

I t should be n o te d , how ever, th a t the sy m p ath e tic re sp o n se of the

ju ry is no t r e s t r i c te d to the p la in tiff . W hile i t i s u su a lly he who h a s

su ffe red in som e w ay (o r c la im s to have su ffe red ), th e re a r e s itu a tio n s

in w hich the defendan t h a s a lso su ffe red and is thus an o b jec t of the ju r y 's

sym pathy . F o r e x a m p le , if a c a r ow ned by M r, A b u t d riv e n by h is son

w e re to c ra s h in to a n o th e r c a r , the son b e in g k ille d in the acc id e n t

although the p ro p e r ty dam age re su ltin g w as c le a r ly h is fa u lt, i t i s

p o ss ib le th a t a lthough a su it a r is in g f ro m th is a c t w ould p lace the fa th e r

(M r, A) a s the d e fen d an t, h is g rie f o v e r the death of h is son m ig h t b rin g

ju ry sym pathy to p lay in h is fav o r. In th is in s ta n c e , i t i s p o ss ib le th a t

70co u n se l fo r the d e fen d an t m igh t r e q u e s t a ju ry t r i a l . The assu m p tio n

in th is case would b e th a t the defense w ould have bo th the p re su m p tio n

fav o rin g the side n o t h av ing the b u rd en of p ro o f a s w ell a s the b e n e fit of

the so -c a lle d hum an e le m e n t fro m the ju ry .

A ssum ing th a t i t h a s been d ec id ed to p r e s e n t a ca se to a ju ry , i t

i s n ex t reco m m en d ed th a t the a tto rn e y s p e r fo rm an a n a ly s is of th e ir

p o te n tia l a u d ie n c e -- th e ju ry . P re su m a b ly , the a tto rn e y h a s s tu d ied h is

own ca se and is f a m il ia r w ith i t s s tre n g th s and w ea k n e sse s in fa c ts ,

a rg u m e n ts , law , and th e c h a ra c te r of h is c lie n t. H is opponent h a s done

lik ew ise . Now, the ch a llen g e to bo th i s to find ju r o r s who a t le a s t a re

n o t p re ju d ic e d a g a in s t th e i r case and a t b e s t in c lin ed to a c c e p t i t a p r io r i .

^°Ibid,, p, 29,

215

The th e o ry of the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s is th a t th ro u g h the e ffo rts of the

a d v e r s a ry s the ju r o r s in c lin ed to p re ju d ic e to w ard e ith e r side w ill thus

be re je c te d and the p an e l f in a lly se le c te d the m o s t ob jective p o ss ib le

g roup f ro m th o se av a ila b le . T h is is a im ed a t fu r th e r in su rin g th a t the

d e c is io n w ill b e a ra t io n a l one b ecau se th o se tending to decide n o n - ra t io n -

71a lly have b een excluded .

Such a th e o ry r e s t s upon a t le a s t two a s su m p tio n s . F i r s t , i t is

a s su m e d th a t i t is p o ss ib le to d isc o v e r a m ean in g fu l continuum of te n ­

d e n c ie s to w ard ra tio n a l and n o n -ra tio n a l d e c is io n -m ak in g w ith r e g a rd

to the sp ec ific c a se a t hand so a s to p e rm it the ran k in g of j u r o r s a c c o rd ­

ing ly and the re je c tio n of th o se a t the one e x tre m e . Second, i t i s a s su m e d

th a t the p a r tic ip a tin g la w y e rs a r e ab le to d isc o v e r the in fo rm a tio n

n e c e s s a ry to p e r fo rm the f i r s t ta sk . E ven m o re , the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s

a s s u m e s th a t bo th p a r t ic ip a tin g s id e s in a c a se do an equally e ffec tiv e

job in ju ry se le c tio n , fo r s u c c e ss by one side and re la tiv e fa i lu re by the

o th e r would c le a r ly s e t up a condition fo s te r in g a n o n -ra tio n a l d ec is io n

in b eh a lf of the side doing the e ffec tiv e w o rk .

In the in fo rm a tio n g a th e rin g step of ju ry se le c tio n , the a tto rn e y

is ex p ec ted to g a th e r in fo rm a tio n p r io r to the t r i a l . I t i s c o n s id e re d a

m is ta k e to b e liev e th a t the a sk in g of s tan d a rd q u es tio n s to p o te n tia l ju r o r s

S. S te v ^ r t , og. c i t . , p . 142,

216

on the day of the t r i a l w ill r e v e a l enough in fo rm a tio n to a c cep t o r r e je c t

the p an e l m e m b e rs . On the c o n tra ry , a s the n am es of the p o te n tia l

ju r o r s a r e av a ilab le in advance of the t r i a l i t i s now the p ra c t ic e to

p e r fo rm a fu ll in v e s tig a tio n upon th em . In som e c i t ie s , in v es tig a tiv e

s e rv ic e s e x is t w hich s e c u re a com plete r e p o r t on each m e m b e r of the

g roup of p ro sp e c tiv e j u r o r s co v erin g such i te m s a s d o m estic s itu a tio n ,

p r e s e n t and p re v io u s em p loym en t, p o lit ic a l a ffilia tio n , econom ic s ta tu s ,

club m e m b e rsh ip s , p re v io u s e3qperience w ith l itig a tio n o r ju r ie s , and so

fo rth . T h ese ag e n c ie s o p e ra te fo r a fee and in m any c a s e s g a th e r a l l

in fo rm a tio n w ithou t m ak in g ac tu a l p e rso n a l c o n ta c t w ith the in d iv id u a ls .

T h is in fo rm a tio n , along w ith anything e lse known about the ju r o r s , i s

freq u e n tly p lac e d in a m a s te r f ile w hich then i s u se d to p re p a re the

q u e s tio n s to b e a sk e d of the p an e l during the v o ir d ire o r se le c tio n p ro c e s s ? ^

To s ta te m o re sp ec ific a lly w hat in fo rm a tio n is sought th rough

th e se in v e s tig a tio n s ,

i t i s conven ien t fo r a law y er who is to t r y a ju ry c a se to know a s m uch a s can b e re a d ily and p ro p e r ly a s c e r ta in e d about the s o c ia l, f in a n c ia l and p o lit ic a l back g ro u n d of p e rso n s who m ay be ca lle d in to th e ju ry box fo r ex am in a tio n . T h e ir f r a te rn a l so c ie ty and re lig io u s a ff ilia tio n s , w h e th e r they a r e em p lo y e rs o r em p lo y ees , w h e th e r they a re m e m b e rs of unions and , if so , w hat u n io n s , w h e th e r th ey have even h ad tro u b le w ith the law ,

R , L o r r y , o£, c it. , p . 35. ^^I b id . , p . 38.

^'^Hickam and S can lon , 0£ . c i t . , p . 35.

217

o r b e e n engaged in li t ig a tio n an d , if so , w hat l itig a tio n , w h e th e r th ey a r e m a r r ie d o r s in g le , and w hat th e i r sp ouses do fo r a liv in g , -wiiether th ey a r e in te ll ig e n t o r s tu p id , educated o r i l l i t e r a t e , o p in io n a ted , o r e a s ily p e rsu a d e d , fo rc e fu l o r w eak in c h a r a c te r , and a dozen o th e r m a t te r s , m ay in fluence an a t to rn e y 's ju d g m en t in challeng ing ta le s m e n fo r cau se o r o th e rw ise .

T he w r i te r s do no t d is c u s s th e in v e s tig a tiv e m e th o d u se d in ob ta in ing

su ch in fo rm a tio n , b u t f ro m th e e m p h a s is upon avo id ing co n tac t i t m a y be

a s su m e d th a t l i t t le o r no u se i s c u r re n tly be ing m ad e of p sy ch o lo g ica l

te s t in g m e th o d s .

The f in a l p ro c e s s of s e le c tio n in the c o u r tro o m v a r ie s am ong

ju r is d ic t io n s w ith in the U nited S ta te s . In the f i r s t p la c e , th e re i s no

d is a g re e m e n t th a t the o p p o rtu n ity to see the p o te n tia l ju r o r s w ill p ro v id e

m u ch ad d itio n a l in fo rm a tio n c o n ce rn in g th e ir v a lu e to a p a r t ic u la r a t t o r ­

n ey . T he w ise t r i a l law y e r w ill w atch the g roup c a re fu lly s ta r tin g a t th e

f i r s t m o m en t p o s s ib le , and h e w ill d raw c e r ta in in fe re n c e s ab o u t th e i r

lik e ly re sp o n s e to a rg u m e n t f ro m h is o b se rv a tio n . In any c a s e , th e

f in a l ta s k of p ick in g tw elve j u r o r s (few er in som e s itu a tio n s) in v o lv es

v isu a l o b se rv a tio n and q u estio n in g e i th e r by the a tto rn e y s th e m se lv e s o r

b y the judge u s in g a s e r ie s of q u e s tio n s su b m itted by the a t to rn e y s . I t

i s a s su m e d th a t the p re v io u s ly g a th e re d in fo rm a tio n coupled w itli w hat

^ E u s tac e C ullinan , P r e p a ra t io n fo r T r ia l of C iv il A c tio n s , A m e ric a n L aw In s titu te and C o m m ittee on C ontinuing L eg a l E d u ca tio n an d the A m e ric a n B a r A sso c ia tio n (P h ilad e lp h ia : 1951), p . 50.

^^L loyd P a u l S try k e r , The A r t of A dvocacy (New Y ork: Sim on an d S c h u s te r , 1954), p . 54.

218

is re v e a le d d u rin g the v o ir d i r e ex am in a tio n w ill su ffice to expose those

p e rs o n s m o s t lik e ly to d ec id e n o n -ra tio n a lly in one d ire c tio n o r an o th er.

T he co n sen su s of p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s fa v o rs allow ing the t r i a l

la w y e rs th e m se lv e s to a sk q u es tio n s of the p ro sp e c tiv e j u r o r s . The

a tto rn e y s , no t the judge, hav e s tu d ied th e ir c a s e s and know w hat em o ­

tio n a l, m o ra l and econom ic f o rc e s a re involved in the f a c ts . They a re

f a m il ia r w ith tlie w itn e sse s they ex p ec t to ca ll and th e re fo re should be

in a b e t te r p o s itio n to a n tic ip a te th e i r im p ac t upon v a r io u s ty p e s of

77p eo p le . One su c c e ss fu l t r i a l la w y e r s ta te s , fu r th e r , th a t h is chance

to q u es tio n the ju r o r s is an " , , , in v alu ab le opportun ity to m ake p e rso n a l

c o n tac t w ith the ju ro r and gauge h is p e rso n a lity and m in d , " F a c e - to -fa c e

sp eech , he co n tin u es , p e rm its one to " , . , ge t beh ind the f a c e 's m a sk .

S o m etim es a h a rd face lig h ts up in a w a rm sm ile , o r a k ind ly face

b e co m e s fo rb id d in g a s the l ip s c u rv e du rin g an a n sw e r, In such

p e rs o n a l q u es tio n in g , he c o n tin u es , i t i s p o ss ib le to se n se a bond of

sym pathy o r r e s is ta n c e , "A ll the p sy ch o lo g ica l a r t s c an be em ployed to

ev a lu a te the j u r o r 's le an in g s , "^9 in c o n tra s t , he co n c lu d es , l i t t le can be

le a rn e d by o b se rv in g a g roup of peop le an sw er the q u e s tio n s p u t by the

judge,

R , L o r ry , op, c i t , , p , 36,

^^L o u is N iz e r , My L ife in C o u rt (New Y ork: P y ra m id B ooks, 1963), p , 40,

7 9 ib id , , pp , 40-41 ,

219

When a j u r o r who is c le a r ly u n accep tab le a s defined by law is

found, he is e a s ily ex c lu d ed by s ta tin g the cau se of h is u n a c ce p tab ility .

Such le g itim a te c a u s e s v a ry am ong the ju r is d ic t io n s , b u t u su a lly a re

c le a r - c u t in d ic a tio n s of p re ju d ic e d a ttitu d e to w ard the sp ec ific c a se o r

such c a s e s in g e n e ra l . L e ss e a sy to define a r e the c a u s e s fo r w hich

an a tto rn e y i s p e rm it te d to exclude a ju r o r p e re m p to r ily . In th is c a s e ,

i t i s s im p ly a s su m e d th a t i t i s re a so n a b le fo r a law y e r to o b je c t to a

p o te n tia l ju r o r b e c a u s e he h a s an in tu itiv e fee lin g w hich c a l ls fo r

re je c tio n . Some such fee lin g s can be id en tified . F o r e x a m p le , if a

ju r o r h a s b een o b jec te d to fo r cau se b u t the ob jection h a s b e e n o v e rru le d ,

the law y er m ay w ish to send the ju r o r aw ay p e re m p to r ily fo r f e a r he h a s

been in su lte d by the o r ig in a l o b jec tio n , and the in su lt m ig h t p re ju d ic e

h im a g a in s t the c a s e , A s the n u m b er of p e re m p to ry ch a lle n g e s is

l im ite d , the p r e s e r v a t io n of th e m u n til the s tra te g ic tim e b e c o m e s so m e­

thing of a gam e b e tw een the la w y e rs . E a ch a tte m p ts to fo rc e the o th e r

to exclude a ju r o r who w as ob jec tio n ab le to the f i r s t la w y e r , th u s the

opponent h a s w a s te d a cha llenge and th e re b y h e lp ed the one who fo rc e d

h im to do i t . F u r th e r , if one law y er can a r ra n g e i t so h is opponent h a s

u se d a ll h is c h a lle n g e s w hile s ti l l re ta in in g som e of h is c h a lle n g e s , then

he h a s c o n tro l of the s itu a tio n and m ay e ffec t an im b a lan ce on the ju ry

in h is favor, ®2

80 W, S, S te w a rt, op, c i t , , ppw 140-141, ^ k b id ., 141, % bid i, p . 143,

220

F in a lly , in the se le c tio n of the ju ry , w hat c h a r a c te r is t ic s do the

a tto rn e y s look fo r on w hich to b a se th e ir accep tan ce o r re je c tio n ? The

c h a r a c te r is t ic s see m to d iv ide in to th re e c a té g o rie s - - in te llig e n c e and

education , le a d e rsh ip c a p a c ity , and p re ju d ic e - -w ith the l a s t b e in g the

m o s t w idely d isc u s s e d and the m o s t am b ig u o u s.

E d u ca tio n of j u r o r s , and th e ir in te ll ig e n c e , is m ean ing fu l to the

t r i a l a tto rn e y in two w ay s. In the f i r s t p la c e , the in te llig e n c e and

u n d ers tan d in g of the ju ry m u s t be su ffic ien t to follow the d e ta i ls andQ O

a rg u m e n ts w hich the la w y e r in ten d s to u se in the t r i a l . M uch litig a tio n

invo lves a deep p e n e tra tio n in to com p lex s u b je c t-m a tte r , w ith the ju ry

being ob liged to s e le c t f ro m v a r io u s e x p e r t te s tim o n y and to ev a lu a te

a rg u m en ts f ro m the te s tim o n y . P re su m a b ly , in such a c a se i t would

e ith e r be to the advan tage of bo th p a r t ie s th a t the ju ry be ab le to c o m p re ­

hend the p ro ce e d in g s; o r , should one side p e rc e iv e i ts e l f a s c le a r ly

d e fic ien t in te r m s of fa c t, i t m ig h t w ish to ob ta in a l e s s in te llig e n t ju ry

and hope to w in th ro u g h m isu n d e rs ta n d in g . In any ev en t, i t i s fe l t to be

v aluab le to the a tto rn e y th a t he ob ta in d a ta on the in te llig e n c e and edu­

ca tio n of the ju ry so a s to in c re a s e h is a l te rn a t iv e s .

L e a d e rsh ip p o te n tia l of v a r io u s m e m b e rs of the ju ry i s a lso of

in te r e s t to a t to rn e y s . The follow ing s ta te m e n t, m ade e a r ly in the p re s e n t

®^Samuel W eiss , How to T ry a C ase (New Y ork; B a k e r , V oorh is and Co. a 1940), pp , 4 5 -4 6 ,

221

c e n tu ry , su g g e s ts one a ttitu d e on ju ry s e le c tio n w ith re g a rd to in te l l ig e n c e

le a d e r s h ip , p e r s o n a li ty , e tc .

M ark th e i r [ the j u r y ] c an d o r, a g e , h u m o r, in te llig e n c e , so c ia l s tan d in g , o ccu p a tio n , and le t y o u r e y es choose the m o s t f r ie n d ly , l ib e r a l and noble fa c e s - -y o u n g o r o ld , but b e t te r young than o ld - - b e t te r w a rm th an co ld fa c e s ; b e t te r b u ild e rs than s a le sm e n , b e t te r f a r m e r s th an in v e n to rs , b e t te r good, l ib e ra l d e a le r s than a ll . A void d o c to rs , law ­y e r s , and p e ttifo g g e rs . T h e re is a l i t t le m a n , d e fo rm ed , n a r ro w , s e lf ish , o p in ionated . Y onder i s a c a p tio u s , c a u s tic , w itty m a n , of s ta le jo k e s and s t r e e t - c o r n e r a rg u m e n ts ; and f u r th e r on is a h a rd m a n , g r im -fa c e d and co ld , g re y look, w hite b lood and g la s s y e y e s . R ule th em a l l off, if p o s s ib le .The w o rld h a s u se d th e m i l l . T hey w ill sp re a d th e ir m is e ry fo r com pany sak e ,

The sam e au th o r goes on to em p h asize the p o s s ib le im p o rta n c e of l e a d e r ­

sh ip th ro u g h sp e c ia l ed u ca tio n o r e x p e r ie n c e . He say s th a t if the ca se

in v o lv es a p ro b le m of c o n s tru c tio n and one of the j u r o r s is a c o n s tru c tio n

e n g in e e r , th e re i s a s tro n g lik e lih o o d th a t w h a te v e r opinion he e x p re s s e s

to the ju ry w ill be a c c e p te d a s com ing fro m an a u th o r ity . T h is ten d s to

be tru e a c r o s s the b o a r d - - i f the c a se in v o lv es in s u ra n c e , an in su ra n c e

Q Cm an on the ju ry w ill have e x tre m e in flu e n c e , e t c , , s ta te s th is au th o r .

The fo ca l p o in t of m o s t co n c e rn in ju ry se le c tio n , h o w ev er, is

the d isc o v e ry of p re ju d ic ia l a ttitu d e s lik e ly to in flu en ce unduly the

d e c is io n . The p re ju d ic e s a r e sought n o t only to rem o v e the u n d e s ira b le

on es b u t to find th o se who com e in c lin ed to v o te w ith the exam ining

Jo sep h W. D onovan, M odern J u ry T r ia l s (New Y ork: G, A, Jen n in g s C o ,, I n c , , 1927), p , 227,

85 lb id . , p , 228,

222

la w y e r . The te s tim o n y of the p ra c t i t io n e r s su g g es ts th a t w hile the

su c c e ss fu l t r i a l law y er knows th a t l i t t le can be le a rn e d by openly ask in g

a ju r o r if he is p re ju d ic e d , n e v e r th e le s s th is is f re q u e n tly the ex ten t ofQ /

ex am in a tio n . On the c o n tra ry , the reco m m en d a tio n of the effec tive

t r i a l la w y e r is th a t ju r o r s can b e p ro b ed fo r p re ju d ic e only by thorough

o b se rv a tio n , and by engaging th e m in p e rso n a l c o n v e rsa tio n to the l im it

a llow ed by the c o u r t. The c o u n se l t r i e s to a sk q u e s tio n s th a t re q u ire

m o re th an a s ing le w ord a n s w e r- -h e w an ts the j u r o r to ta lk to h im . He

t r i e s to g e t the ju r o r to te l l ab o u t h is hom e life , w o rk , fam ily b ack g ro u n d ,

no ting no t only th e substance of the an sw er b u t how the ju ro r e x p re s s e s

h im se lf . S o m etim es the la w y e r w ill engage in som e re p a r te e w ith

88h is opponent and w atch the e ffe c t i t h a s upon v a r io u s ju r o r s .

F ro m th e se e f fo r ts , an a tto rn e y ex p ec ts to le a r n if the ju r o r h as

p re v io u s ly s e rv e d on a ju ry , an d if so how he v o ted . He le a rn s if the

ju r o r h as h im se lf b een involved in litig a tio n , and if so , on w hich side;

h e le a rn s if the ju r o r h as b een a cc u sed of any c r im e , and if so , w hat

th e ou tcom e w as; he le a rn s w h e th e r anyone c lo se to the ju r o r (husband,

w ife , r e la t iv e , o r c lo se f r ie n d , e tc . ) h a s b een so invo lved w ith the c o u r ts .

® ^F ran c is L , W ellm an , S u ccess in C o u rt, f^ew Y ork: The M ac­m illa n C om pany, 1941), pp. 100-101.

®^W. S. S tew art, og. c i t . , p . 142; S. W e is s , op. c i4 ., p . 44.

®®F. L . W ellm an , S u c ce ss in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 99.

223

T he law y er a tte m p ts to le a rn if the ju r o r is a w ork ingm an o r m e m b e r of

a la b o r union o r a m e m b e r of m a n a g em e n t, o r se lf-e m p lo y e d o r u n em ­

p loyed o r if anyone c lo se to h im is so a s so c ia te d w ith a m a jo r

em p lo y m en t g roup . The law y er in v e s tig a te s w h eth er o r no t the ju ro r

h a s any p re v io u s e x p e rie n c e w ith the p a r t ic u la r l i t ig a n ts , th e ir la w y e r ,

o r th e i r p ro b le m s . S p ec ific a lly , the law y er seek s to le a rn if the ju r o r

h a s fo rm e d any ju d g m en t re g a rd in g the c a s e , the l i t ig a n ts , th e ir la w y e r ,

e t c . ; and he goes beyond sim p ly ask in g the ju ro r if he i s ab le to abide

by the p rep o n d e ran c e of ev idence r e g a rd le s s of the d ire c tio n i t goes .

T he ju r o r i s q u estio n ed re g a rd in g h is own e x p e r ie n c e s - -w h e th e r he h a s

e v e r su ffe re d in ju ry such a s th a t w hich i s invo lved in the p r e s e n t c a s e ,

o r w h e th e r he h a s c a u se d such in ju ry , o r w h eth er anyone c lo se to the

ju r o r h a s b e e n so invo lved . In each of th e se avenues of in q u iry , the

d e te rm in a tio n of the ex is te n c e of one o r m o re of the f a c to r s g e n e ra lly

su g g e s ts the p re su m e d p re ju d ic e . T h a t i s , if the ju r o r i s a m e m b e r of

m an ag em en t and the c a s e in v o lv es a co n te s t betw een a w o rk e r and h is

e m p lo y e r , i t i s ex p ec ted th a t the ju r o r w ill be p re - in c l in e d to fav o r the

em p lo y e r.

R es tin g m o re on the te s tim o n y of the p r a c t i t io n e r s is the ju d g ­

m e n t of the in fluence of n a tio n a lity on a d ec is io n . T h e re se em s to be no

d is a g re e m e n t th a t the e thn ic d e r iv a tio n of the ju r o r w ill s ig n ifican tly

224

a ffe c t the w ay in w hich the ju ro r re sp o n d s to the t r i a l . In one c a s e , the

w r i te r su g g es ts th a t la w y e rs a g re e th a t th e I r i s h , I ta lia n s and Jew s

", . . a r e su b jec t to an em o tio n a l a p p e a l, w hile the S co tch , E n g lish ,

G erm an s and N o rd ic s a r e no t, "89 T he a u th o r does ad m it th a t ex cep tio n s

to th is ru le a re p o s s ib le . I t is a lso a g re e d th a t v a r io u s re lig io u s and

ethn ic g roups can b e ex p ec ted to be p re ju d ic e d a g a in s t one a n o th e r , I t

a lso se e m s to be a c c e p te d th a t young j u r o r s a r e to be ex p ec ted to be le s s

d ifficu lt to d ea l w ith and m o re lik e ly to be re ce p tiv e to a rg u m e n t. The

young ju r o r is th u s p r e f e r r e d by p la in tiffs and opposed by d e fen d an ts , 91

A re m a in in g p re ju d ic e m o s t d iff ic u lt of a l l to c h a ra c te r iz e i s

th a t feeling th a t a j u r o r sim p ly does n o t lik e a la w y e r. A fte r som e tim e

spen t question ing a p o te n tia l ju r o r , la w y e rs te s tify re g u la r ly th a t som e

m en sim p ly seem a p r io r i un likely to s e e the ca se in the way the a t to rn e y

w ould have i t , 92 in such c a s e s , co u n se l r e je c ts the ju r o r p e re m p to r i ly

and hopes th a t i t d o es no t la te r tu rn o u t th a t the ju r o r w as p re d isp o s e d

to vo te in fa v o r of th e m an who re je c te d h im , 93

The fa c to r th a t m a k e s the se le c tio n of a ju ry of sp e c ia l in te r e s t

to the rh e to r ic ia n i s th e cho ice a v a ila b le to the one who w ould seek to

89w , S, S te w a r t, og. c i t , ,. p . 143,

90f , L , W ellm an , S uccess in C o u rt, op, c i t . , p , 99,

91lbid, 9 2 ib id ., p. 106,

93w , R , L o r r y , o£. c i t , , p , 35,

225

in flu en ce . T h a t i s , r h e to r ic h a s long co n ce rn e d i t s e l f w ith the a n a ly s is

of the aud ien ce to b e in flu en c ed , b u t u su a lly fronti th e p e rsp e c tiv e of

see in g w hat can be done to a d ju s t to the in d iv id u a ls who a re th ru s t upon

the s p e a k e r . In the c o u r tro o m , h o w ev er, the sp e a k e r h a s som e o p p o r­

tu n ity to s e le c t , f ro m am ong a la rg e group p re s e n te d to h im , th o se

p e r s o n s who b e s t su it h im - - th e s p e a k e r . T h u s , the d isc o v e ry of a

ra tio n a le upon w hich to b a s e th is se le c tio n p o s e s a r a th e r d iffe re n t p r o ­

b le m than th a t of seek ing to a d ju s t to a g iven au d ien ce .

The O pening S ta tem en t

C a re fu l thought and long p ra c t ic e h a s e s ta b lis h e d a c le a r p a t te rn

to a t r i a l a t law , one fe lt to b e b e s t d esig n ed to b r in g the judge o r ju ry

to the m o s t r a tio n a l p o s s ib le d e c is io n . The a u d ito rs a r e f i r s t to ld w hat

i s to b e p ro v ed ; th en they a r e p re s e n te d w ith th e p ro o f; then th ey a r e to ld

the s ig n ifican ce of the p ro o f. T he f i r s t s te p - - th e opening s ta te m e n t- - is

in ten d ed to do noth ing m o re th an give a p re v ie w of w hat i s to com e.

"The p u rp o se of the opening s ta te m e n ts of co u n se l i s to in fo rm the ju ry

in a g e n e ra l w ay of the n a tu re of the ac tio n and the d e fen se th e re to so

th a t the ju r o r s m ay be b e t te r p r e p a re d to u n d e rs ta n d and ev a lu a te the

ev idence a s i t d ev e lo p s . R ea so n ab ly , the e n t ire c o u r t p ro c e s s i s

vague and m y s te r io u s to the j u r o r s in m any c a s e s and i t i s th u s d e s ira b le

9 4 ib id ., p . 45.

226

th a t they shou ld be in fo rm ed a t once w hat is going to h ap p en . The

opening s ta te m e n t p ro v id e s an opportun ity fo r the a t to rn e y s to enhance

the ju ry*s re c e p tiv ity to th e ir m a te r ia ls w hich fo llow . As one w r i te r

p u t i t , "T he opening s ta te m e n t, b e ing in the n a tu re of a p ro lo g u e , m u s t

to a s g re a t ex te n t a s p o ss ib le su b s titu te fo r the s tag e se ttin g s and l ig h t­

ing e f fe c ts , the p e rsu a s iv e b ac k d ro p s and th e a tr ic a l i l lu s io n s so e ffective

95in c re a tin g the a p p ro p ria te a tm o sp h e re in the th e a tr e , " The follow ing

p a ra g ra p h is a h y p o th e tica l i l lu s tr a t io n of w hat m ig h t be sa id in an

opening s ta te m e n t to exp lain i t s p u rp o se .

Now th a t you have b een s e le c te d to t r y th is c a s e , o u r p r a c ­tic e p e r m its m e to m ake w hat is known a s an opening s ta te m e n t b e fo re the w itn e sse s a r e c a lle d . A s I to ld you d u rin g y o u r se le c tio n , I r e p re s e n t the p la in tiff and I am now going to open on b e h a lf of the p la in tiff . T h is opening s ta te m e n t is n o t ev id en ce , and i t w ould n o t be p ro p e r fo r m e to a rg u e , I m ak e th is opening s ta te m e n t only in the hope th a t I m igh t a s s i s t you in unde r standing the ev idence a s i t is p ro d u ced . In th is opening s ta te m e n t I hope I can p u t o u r th eo ry in a connected fo rm , giving you th e p ic tu re w hich m u s t n e c e s s a r i ly com e b i t by b it f ro m the w itn e s s e s ,

W ithin the open ing , th e re a r e r e s t r ic t io n s a s to the ex ten t the a tto rn e y

can go in ex p la in in g the law inv o lv ed , b u t g e n e ra lly he is p e rm it te d to

exp la in law to the ex ten t i t i s n e c e s s a ry to the p ro p e r u n d ers tan d in g of

the c a s e . A lso w ith in th is sp eech to the ju ry i t i s p ro p e r to an tic ip a te

9 5 lb id ,, p , 47,

S, S tew art, op_, c i t , , p , 159.

22 7

any m is im d e rs ta n d in g o v e r te rm s o r m a te r ia ls w hich w ill be u sed in the

p ro o f. If u sag e in the t r i a l w ill v a ry f ro m o rd in a ry u s a g e , i t i s d e s ira b le

to d is c u s s th is w ith th e ju ry in the opening so a s to in c r e a s e th e ir c o m ­

p re h e n s io n ,

A g re a t d e a l of em p h asis i s p la c e d upon the va lue of aud ience

a tten tio n and the im p o rta n c e of ge ttin g a m e ssa g e to the ju ry w hile i ts

m e m b e rs a r e s t i l l f r e s h and in te re s te d . Not only i s the sp e a k e r e x h o rted

to o b ta in the a tte n tio n of the ju ry in it ia l ly , b u t he i s ex p ec ted to gauge the

len g th of h is r e m a rk s to th e ir a tten tio n , D iffe ren t f ro m the o rd in a ry

sp e a k e r s itu a tio n , if a law y er ru n s o v e r ly long in h is opening r e m a rk s

i t i s p o ss ib le th a t th e judge w ill in te r r u p t to c h a s tis e h im and thus w eaken

h is p o s itio n in th e e s tim a tio n of the ju ry ,

L eg a l p r a c t i t io n e r s give a good d ea l of though t to the q u estio n of

w hich is m o re in flu e n tia l in the speak ing s itu a tio n , p r im a c y o r re c e n c y .

G en e ra lly , the w r i te r s choose the safe ground and s e le c t bo th . They

a rg u e th a t the f i r s t sp e a k e r in the t r i a l gains an ad v an tag e a s w ell a s

the f in a l s p e a k e r , T h is co m es in to c o n s id e ra tio n w ith re g a rd to the

c o u n se l fo r the d e fe n se , a s he h a s an option to p r e s e n t h is opening

97 F . L . W ellm an , Day in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 136.

98w , S, S tew art, o£, c i t , , p , 158,

99w, R , L o r r y , o£, c i t , , p , 51,

100 J , C, R eed , 0£ , c i t . , p , 195,

228

s ta te m e n t e i th e r im m e d ia te ly a f te r the sp eak e r fo r the p la in tiff o r a f te r

the co m p le tio n of the p re s e n ta t io n of the p la in tif f 's ev id en ce . A t le a s t

one re c e n t c o m m e n ta to r u rg e s the defense to open im m ed ia te ly . To

w a it, he s ta te s , r a i s e s a s e r io u s chance th a t the oppo rtu n ity to wirL'. a

re c e p tiv e h e a r in g f ro m the ju ry h as p a s se d . " F i r s t im p re s s io n s , " th is

a u th o r n o te s , " freq u en tly in flu en ce an in d iv id u a l's th inking to such an

esctent a s to c o lo r the e ffe c t of a l l subsequen t e x p e r ie n c e s . H is

e3q>lanation fo r th is i s th a t the ju ry ten d s to develop a " s e t" in th e ir

th ink ing f ro m the opening s ta te m e n t fo r the p la in tiff , and once th is

o c c u rs i t i s v e ry d iff icu lt to b r in g the ju ry into an a ttitu d e of w illin g n e ss

to l is te n to an opposing v iew poin t.

Fo llow ing th is th e o ry , the au th o r co n tin u es, i t is re a so n ab le to

ex p ec t th a t a t t im e s the f i r s t sp e a k e r is so effec tiv e a s to "ch an n e lize"

the th inking of som e ju r o r s f ro m th a t po in t on, ". . , so th a t a l l ev idence

th e r e a f te r re c e iv e d is n o t h e a rd w ith the sam e o b jec tiv ity a s w ould be

the c a se w e re such an opening s ta te m e n t not to be m ad e . "102 F ro m th is

lin e of re a so n in g , i t i s concluded th a t the defense a tto rn e y would b e w ise

to in tro d u ce h is p o s itio n a s soon a s p o ss ib le so a s to avoid the e ffe c ts of

the op p o n en t's r e m a rk s .

T h is a n a ly s is i s a c le a r d em o n stra tio n of the opposition of the

la w y e r 's rh e to r ic to the rh e to r ic a l foundations of th e leg a l sy s te m . The

10 Iw . R . L o r r y , o£. c i t . , p . 49. lO^Ib id .

229

sy s te m seek s a r a t io n a l d e c is io n by re q u e s tin g the ju r y to w ithhold ju d g ­

m e n t u n til a l l th e ev id en ce i s in . The la w y e r know s, th rough p r a c t ic e ,

th a t th is canno t b e a s su m e d to have o c c u r re d . T h u s , the law y er s e e k s

to tak e advan tage of a p re s u m e d m o tiv e on the p a r t of the ju ry , to red u c e

the te n s io n s of in d e c is io n , by w ork ing fo r im m ed ia te judgm ent in h is

fa v o r . The le g a l sy s te m se ek s to o ffse t the p o ss ib le n o n -ra tio n a l e ffec t

of th is by p re s e n tin g the sam e o p p o rtu n ity to the opposing cou n se l. If,

h o w e v e r, the la w y e r s ’ th e o ry of g r e a t s tre n g th in the f i r s t a rg u m e n t

p re s e n te d h o ld s , th en to th a t ex ten t the ra tio n a l e ffec t of the a d v e r s a r y

sy s te m i s red u c ed .

I t h a s a lr e a d y b e e n su g g ested th a t the opening i s an e x e rc is e in

in fo rm a tiv e s p e e c h - - th e a tto rn e y is e3q>licitly fo rb id d en to engage in

a rg u m e n t. T h is p r e s e n ts som e co n flic t in th ink ing , fo r while a ll w r i te r s

on the su b jec t a g re e th a t one m u s t fo llow the r e s t r ic t io n to avo id a r g u ­

m e n t, a t the sa m e tim e a l l se e m to a g re e th a t the opening s ta te m e n t i s

a good o p p o rtu n ity fo r a s p e a k e r to advance h is p o s itio n . The r e s u l t is

th a t the la w y e r i s e n c o u ra g e d to be f a i r , c le a r , b r ie f , in fo rm a tiv e ,

cand id , s im p le , and a t th e sam e tim e to b e fo rc e fu l, s tro n g , and w in a

fa v o ra b le im p re s s io n f ro m the ju ry . M ore sp e c if ic a lly , the opening

i s to b e confined to th e fa c ts and m u s t n o t inc lude a d isc u ss io n of how

49.W. D onovan, og. c i t . , p . 211; S. W e iss , og. c i t . , p p . 4 8 -

230

the fa c ts a r e to be p ro v ed . The s ta te m e n t should be te m p e ra te and

confined w ith in re a so n a b le bounds of p ro p r ie ty and good fa ith , "A nything

ap p ro ach in g an em o tio n a l a p p e a l, o r an a tte m p t to sway the ju ry im p ro ­

p e r ly should be a s s id u o u s ly av o ided , If a sp e a k e r does s tra y beyond

the l im its in h is opening , he r is k s being in te r ru p te d by h is opponent and

reb u k ed by the ju d g e , "T h is m ig h t cau se the ju ry to b e liev e you w ere

try in g to p u ll som eth ing o v e r on th em and s h a tte r com plete ly the e ffec t

of y o u r in tro d u c to ry ex p o s itio n , The way in w hich in fo rm atio n is

to b e com bined w ith p e r s u a s io n , conclude the w r i te r s , i s to m ake the

f a c ts a s p re s e n te d su ffic ien tly d ra m a tic th a t they m ak e th e ir own co n ­

c lu s io n s , "V ery few p e r s o n s , " s ta te s an e a r ly co m m en ta to r, ", , ,

co m p reh en d the fo rc e th a t th e re i s in a c le a r , su cc in c t, o rd e r ly

n a r r a t iv e of f a c t s , " He co n tin u es , " th e re is a lo g ic a l pow er abou t such

a n a r ra t iv e th a t ex ceed s o ften the m e re fo rc e of ingen ious rea so n in g .

I t i s the n a tu ra l log ic of the f a c ts , "1^7

W ith r e g a rd to the m a n n e r of sp eech in th e opening s ta te m e n t,

th e re see m s to be g e n e ra l a g re e m e n t th a t the s ty le ought to be c o n v e r ­

s a tio n a l, f r ie n d ly , and w ithou t tlie u se of e ith e r te c h n ic a l or f lo r id

lan g u ag e . The sp ea k e r i s ex p ec ted to avo id the s te reo ty p e d p h y s ic a l

104-y^ R , L o r ry , op, c i t , , p , 51, ^^^I b id . , p , 53,

lO^ib id , W, D onovan, og, c i t . , p , 240,

231

m a n n e r ism s a s s o c ia te d w ith the o ra to r - -m o v e m e n t, g e s tu re , v o ice ,

e tc . He is not to le c tu re the judge o r ju ry , b u t r a th e r in fo rm a s one

p e rs o n to an o th e r .

The a r ra n g e m e n t of the opening s ta te m e n t is fe lt to be an

im p o rta n t fa c to r in judge o r ju ry c o m p reh en s io n . G en era lly speak ing ,

the ch ro n o lo g ica l o rd e r is c o n s id e re d b e s t , w ith a g re e m e n t th a t som e

c a s e s should s ta r t w ith the key even t and th en go b ack and r e la te s u r ­

rounding fa c ts in a t im e sequence . In any c a s e , the law y er i s u rg ed

to s e t out only th o se fa c ts he can rea so n ab ly ex p ec t to p ro v e . If an y th in g

he should u n d e rs ta te h is c a se .

The opening s ta te m e n t, th en , c o r re sp o n d s to the ex o rd iu m and

n a r ra t io n in the tra d it io n a l o ra tio n a s s e t fo r th in the rh e to r ic of C ice ro .

I t p e r fo rm s the ta s k of meiking the in i t ia l ap p ro ac h to the a u d ito r to -win

a fav o rab le h e a rin g and in s t ru c t h im a s to the n a tu re of the c a s e . I t

p r e p a re s the judge o r ju ry to h e a r the te s tim o n y and see the ev id en ce ,

w hich i s to co m e , w ith in te llig e n t u n d e rs tan d in g . In ev itab ly , the opening

a lso in tro d u c e s the p e r fo r m e r s (i . e . , the law y e rs ) to the a u d ito rs . If

the opening s ta te m e n t s e rv e s to b r in g the judge o r ju ry to h e a r the

ev idence o b j e c t i v e l y i t h a s acco m p lish ed i t s m in im um p u rp o se ; if one

lO SRenry H ard w ick e , 0£, c i t . , pp . 38-39; W. R . L o r r y , 0£ . c i t . , pp . 46 -47 .

109w. S. S tew art, og. c i t . , p . 160; J , C. R eed , og, c i t . , p . 239.

11ÛF. L . W ellm an , Day in C o u rt, op. c i t . , pp . 134-137.

232

la w y e r m an ag es to w in sp e c ia l fa v o r th rough h is open ing , i t i s s im p ly a

p ro d u c t of the a d v e r s a ry sy s tem w hich can be e jq jec ted to o ccu r f ro m

tim e to tim e .

P re s e n ta t io n of E v idence

E v id en ce in a c o u r t of law p r e s e n ts a v e ry c o m p lica ted ch a llen g e

to the s tuden t of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry . P ro b a b ly in no o th e r p lace do es the

law d e m o n s tra te so m uch co n ce rn fo r the rh e to r ic a l a s p e c ts of the

ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s . E v id en ce , in law , is the stuff f ro m w hich d e c is io n s

a r e m ad e . T h e re i s exp ec ted to be a p o s itiv e c o r re la t io n be tw een the

q u a lity of ev idence p re se n te d in a t r i a l and the q u a lity of the d ec is io n

re n d e re d . T h a t i s , if the ev idence i s ra tio n a l so should be the d ec is io n .

The p ro b le m s th a t a r i s e , bo th le g a l and rh e to r ic a l , a r e co n ce rn ed w ith

a s s u r in g th a t the ev idence is r a t io n a l.

The o b jec tiv e of ev idence is to d e m o n s tra te fa c t . The o b je c t of

the t r i a l i s to d ec id e on fa c t and th en apply the law to the fa c t. In the

ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s , th e re a r e two s te p s to be c o n s id e re d w ith r e g a rd to

f a c t s - - f i r S t , the a d m iss ib ili ty of the ev idence; seco n d , the p ro b a tiv e

value of the ev id en ce once i t i s a d m itte d in to c o n s id e ra tio n . B oth s te p s

involve rh e to r ic a l th e o ry . In C h ap te r I the lim ita tio n s of ju d ic ia l decision*

m ak in g , a s v iew ed by A r is to t le , w e re d isc u s se d . A t th is po in t, i t is

n e c e s s a ry to d is c u s s the p ra c t ic a l cond itions of ju d ic ia l t r i a l s a s v iew ed

by the A m e ric a n le g a l p ro fe s s io n .

233

F i r s t , a t r i a l ta k e s p la c e w ith in r e s t r i c t io n s of t im e and p la c e .

U nlike the le g is la t iv e a s se m b ly w hich can d e la y ju d g m en t u n til i t is

s a tis f ie d enough in fo rm a tio n i s a v a ila b le , th e c o u r t is o b lig ed by the

n a tu re of th e d e c is io n s i t m a k e s to p ro c e e d w ith the da ta im m e d ia te ly

a t h an d and r e n d e r a ju d g m en t b a s e d on w hat i s p re se n te d . T he c o u rt

m u s t d ec id e on f a c ts r e la tin g to p a s t e v e n ts , and is th e re fo re g e n e ra lly

l im ite d to the te s t im o n ia l r e p o r t of w itn e s s e s o r c irc u m s ta n tia l ev id en ce .

T he fix ed n a tu re of the c o u r t p re v e n ts i t f ro m the m ov em en t w hich m ig h t

a llo w fo r d i r e c t o b se rv a tio n of d a ta s t i l l c u r r e n t to i ts in v e s tig a tio n , ^^^

A s the c o u r t r e l ie s upon ev idence re m o v ed f ro m th e o r ig in a l fa c t i t is

r e a so n e d th a t som e c o n tro l i s n e c e s s a ry to av o id a s m uch a s p o ss ib le

the d is to r t io n w hich is ex p ec ted to o c c u r .

Second , b y the c o n tro v e rs ia l and em o tio n a l n a tu re of th e is s u e s

w ith w hich a c o u r t m u s t d e a l, i t is e:qpected th a t th e p a r t ie s to the co n ­

f l ic t w ill c o n s ta n tly be te m p ted to g a in th e i r c a u se b y f ra u d o r o th e r

m e a n s of d ece iv in g the tr ib u n a l. A g ain , r u le s a r e e s ta b lish e d to g o v ern

u se of ev id en ce a t th o se p o in ts a t w hich f ra u d i s lik e ly to o c c u r .

T h ird , th e p e r s o n s who engage in th e ju d ic ia l in v e s tig a tio n a r e

u su a lly la y m e n w ith r e g a rd to the sp e c ia l a r e a u n d e r in v e s tig a tio n . In

the c o u r t, p ro b le m s of m e d ic in e , p sy ch o lo g y , b u s in e s s , s c ie n c e , and

H, W igm ore , og. c i t , , pp , 927-928 ,

234

so fo r th co n s tan tly com e up fo r d ec is io n . E ven tra in e d ju d g es cannot be

e x p e r ts in each of the f ie ld s dem anding a d ec is io n . E v en m o re , ju r y ­

m e n la c k the tra in in g in the d e c is io n -m ak in g p ro c e s s w hich a judge

p o sse s se s* T h e re fo re , ru le s a r e s e t up to im p o se lim ita tio n s on p ro o f

so a s to e s ta b lis h a s ta n d a rd of in q u iry su itab le to the lay ju d g es. T hus,

in a c o u r t som e d ata w hich w ould be c o n s id e re d by an e x p e r t in the f ie ld

i s o m itted f ro m c o n s id e ra tio n .

F o u r th , the d ra m a tic se ttin g of the c o u rt a s opposed to the ca lm

of a la b o ra to ry r e q u ire s som e sp e c ia l c o n tro ls . A s a lre a d y re p o rte d ,

the is s u e s b e fo re a c o u r t a re u su a lly em otionally toned th e m se lv e s .

T hen , the p a r t ic ip a n ts - -c o u n s e l , c l ie n ts , ju ry , ju d g e , s p e c ta to rs , c o u rt

o f f ic e r s , and the l ik e - - a s they in te r a c t w ith one an o th e r ten d to in c re a s e

the em o tio n a l a s p e c ts of the a tm o sp h e re . P a r t ic u la r ly , the way in w hich

the judge o r ju ry r e a c t to the m e s s a g e s com ing f ro m the ev idence and the

p a r t ic ip a n ts m ay v a ry m e a s u ra b ly acco rd in g to the a tm o sp h e re w ithin

th e c o u rt. T h a t i s to say , th o se a ss ig n e d to the ta s k of a rb i tra t io n a re

c o n s ta n tly b o m b ard ed w ith m e s s a g e s a ttra c tin g th e ir fa v o r to one side o r

the o th e r , no t only the a c tu a l w o rd s of the w itn ess o r the docum ent, b u t

the m a n n e r of the w itn e ss and h is way of speaking and h is ap p ea ra n c e ,

and the way h e re sp o n d s to the a tto rn e y s . E ven m o re than the in tended

p ro o f, the b eh av io r of the a c c u se d o r the c lie n ts w hen th ey a r e not a c tu a lly

235

p e rfo rm in g , o r the b eh av io r of the a t to rn e y s a t a l l t im e s a c t a s m e ssa g e s

to the judge o r ju ry w hich a r e being decoded in te rm s of the i s s u e s of

the t r i a l . A ll of th e se fa c to rs m ay m ak e a g r e a te r o r l e s s e r im p re s s io n

on the a r b i t r a to r s depending upon the c irc u m s ta n c e s in the c o u rtro o m .

T h u s, an o th e r function of the ru le s i s to en co u rag e the fo cu s of a tten tio n

on the m o s t d e s ira b le p ro o fs and d im in ish the fo rc e of the i r r e le v a n t o r

u n d e s ira b le p ro o fs ,

T h ese p r a c t ic a l cond itions of ju d ic ia l t r i a l s , th e r e fo re , fo rm the

foundation of the t r i a l r u le s of a d m is s ib il i ty . S p ec ifica lly , the ta s k of

a ju ry (or judge if th e r e i s no ju ry ) i s to d e te rm in e the p ro b a tiv e value

of the ev idence subm it^'ed,. th a t i s , the w eigh t o r quality to b e a s c r ib e d

to ev idence so a s u ltim a te ly to m ake a d is tin c tio n be tw een the conflic ting

p o s itio n s . The ru le s of a d m iss ib ili ty do n o t seek to p e r fo rm th is ta s k

fo r the ju ry . H o w ev er, a s the a im of th e c o u r t is to in su re a ra tio n a l

d e c is io n , and a s the p r a c t ic a l l im ita tio n s of the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s do not

su g g est an independen t cap ac ity fo r r a t io n a l d e c is io n -m a k in g , ru le s of

a d m iss ib ili ty a r e s e t up to p e rm it the ju d g e to co n tro l the ev id en ce so

th a t only th a t w hich i s w o rth co n s id e rin g i s b ro u g h t to the a tte n tio n of

the ju ry . W hether a p ie c e of ev idence i s w o rth co n s id e rin g depends

llZ T h e fo u r p r a c t ic a l l im ita tio n s on ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m a k in g and m uch of th e ir i l lu s tr a t io n w as taken f ro m J , H. W igm ore , op. c i t , , pp . 925-932.

236

(w ithin the co n tex t of g iven ru le s ) upon w h e th e r the judge d eem s the

ev idence lik e ly to en co u rag e a ra tio n a l d e c is io n in lig h t of the p ra c t ic a l

l im ita tio n s m en tio n ed p re v io u s ly ,

P re s u m a b ly , if i t w e re the judge who g a th e red the fa c ts in each

case a t law , he w ould cu ll out the u n d e s ira b le ev idence b e fo re com ing

to t r i a l . A s th is is not the c a s e ; a s i t i s the p a r t ie s in co n flic t who b rin g

fo rth the e v id en ce , then the t r i a l a s s u m e s the function of a se in e to

rem o v e the unw anted ev idence b e fo re i t can e n te r into the c o n s id e ra tio n

of the ju ry , o p e ra tin g upon the th e o ry , a s s ta ted b e fo re , th a t if the

decid ing p a r ty is no t ex p o sed to i r r a t io n a l p ro o fs then the d ec is io n is

le s s lik e ly to r e s t upon i r r a t io n a l g ro u n d s . I t should be no ted in

p a s s in g th a t the judge,, w hen dec id in g w ithout a ju ry , i s f e l t to b e capable

of p e r fo rm in g both the ta s k of s e le c tin g f ro m a ll the ev idence th a t w hich

i s w o rth co n s id e rin g and then d e te rm in in g the p ro b a tiv e v a lu e of the

re m a in d e r . I t i s a s su m e d th a t th e ju d g e 's tra in in g in ra tio n a l d e c is io n ­

m ak ing is su ffic ien t to o ffse t the w e a k n e s se s seen in a ju ry .

The p u rp o se of the d i r e c t ex am in a tio n is to p ro v id e cond itions

conducive to the co m m u n ica tio n , f ro m w itn e ss to judge o r ju ry , w hat

the w itn e ss h a s p e rc e iv e d of a p a s t fa c t. I t i s re a so n e d by the p r a c t i t io n e r s

of the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s th a t th e p r im a r y v eh ic le of such a com m unication

l l ^ i b i d . , p . 924. ^ ^ ^ Ib id ., p . 925.

237

is a s tra ig h tfo rw a rd re c i ta t io n by the w itn e s s , g e n e ra lly u n s tru c tu re d

by the exam in ing co u n se l. T ha t i s , once the t r i a l ru le s have b een ap p lied

to d e te rm in e w hat w itn e s s e s a r e to b e h e a r d , then i t i s fe lt the m o s t

e ffec tiv e co m m u n ica tio n w ill be a c h iev ed b y le ttin g the w itn e ss r e p o r t

on h is p e rc e p tio n s , in h is own w o rd s , T he exam in ing co u n se l i s

a d v ise d to a sk only th o se q u es tio n s n e c e s s a r y to evoke an a d m iss ib le

re sp o n se f ro m the w itn e ss w ithout su g g es tin g by the n a tu re of the q u es tio n

w hat should be sa id by the w itn e ss , L ead in g q u es tio n s , th o se w hich

e i th e r d ire c tly su g g e s t the a n sw e r w hich co u n se l d e s ir e s o r w hich e m ­

body a m a te r ia l fa c t and m ay be a n s w e re d " y e s " o r "no , " a r e no t

p e rm it te d in the e x am in a tio n in ch ie f,

The te s tim o n y of a w itn e ss i s s t r u c tu r e d , to an ex ten t, by the

ru le s of ev id en ce . In th e f i r s t p la c e , th e oa th w hich i s a d m in is te re d and

the av a ilab le ru le s of p u n ish m en t u n d e r p e r ju ry a r e d esig n ed to s e rv e a

118p ro p h y la c tic p u rp o s e - -p re v e n tio n of in te n tio n a l d is to r tio n of th e r e p o r t .

A d d itio n a lly , i t i s f re q u e n tly re c o m m e n d ed th a t p rev en tin g the fu tu re

w itn e s s e s f ro m s ittin g in c o u r t to h e a r w h at th e o th er w itn e s se s have to

W eiss , 0£ , c i t . , p . 52,

L , W ellm an , Day in C o u rt, op . c i t , , pp , 153; 157»

l l^ H e n ry H ard w ick e , o£, c i t . , pp , 105-106,

H, W ig m o re , o£, c i t , , p p , 942-943,

238

say w ill p re v e n t the te s tim o n y of one f ro m su g g estin g changes o r

ad d itio n s in the te s tim o n y of a n o th e r , M o re o v e r , w hat a w itn e ss can

e x p re s s a s te s tim o n y is l im ite d to the ex ten t th a t he m ay re p o r t only

d ire c tly o b se rv e d da ta ; the ru le s p re v e n t h im fro m e x p re ss in g in fe re n c e s

w hich he h a s d raw n fro m h is o b s e rv a tio n s , a lthough in a q u a lified w ay^^^

The p re su m p tio n i s th a t the judge o r ju ry should b e p e rm itte d to d raw

th e ir own co n c lu s io n s fro m the d ire c t re p o r t . S im ila r ly , the w itn e ss

m ay te s tify only to th a t w hich he h a s h im se lf e x p e rien ced . He m a y no t

u til iz e h e a r s a y . T he h e a r s a y ru le is b a se d upon a know ledge of the

n u m ero u s p o ss ib le e r r o r s u n d erly in g any te s tim o n ia l ev id en ce- -p e rcep tio i^

re c o lle c tio n , n a r ra t io n - -a n d seek s to hold e r r o r to a m in im um by

re q u ir in g a l l te s tim o n ia l a s s e r t io n s to be m ade in c o u rt *?, , , so th a t

th ey m ay th e re be te s te d by in te r ro g a tio n s c a lc u la te d to g e t a t th e se

17 1p o ss ib le so u rc e s of e r r o r and to re v e a l th em , " If the w itn e ss canno t

a p p e a r in c o u r t , he m u s t m ake h is te s tim o n y b e fo re a su itab le o ffic ia l

e lse w h e re .

W ithin th is f ra m e w o rk of r e s t r ic t io n s , th en , the t r i a l a tto rn e y

m u s t p lan to p r e s e n t h is ev idence in the m a n n e r b e s t ca lcu la ted to w in

ap p ro v a l fro m th o se a s s ig n e d to ju d g e , A q u es tio n i s th u s r a is e d a s to

S. S te w art, og. c i t . , p . 168,

H, W igm ore , og. c i t . , p . 944.

1 2 1 lb id ., p . 942.

239

the m o s t e ffec tiv e o rd e r in w hich to p r e s e n t w itn e s s e s , and the a lm o s t

u n iv e r s a l ad v ice is to p r e s e n t the b e s t f i r s t . If a c a se i s to tu rn p r i ­

m a r i ly on the te s tim o n y of a key w itn e ss , one who w ill do the m o s t to

im p r e s s the judge o r ju ry w ith the s tre n g th of the c a s e , then he should

be p u t on f i r s t . The v a lu e of p r im a c y is em p h as iz ed no t only in

co n n ec tio n w ith the co n ten t of the te s tim o n y , b u t w ith the e ffec tiv e n e ss

of p re s e n tin g the te s tim o n y a s w ell. The m o s t in te llig e n t, h o n es t, and

p e r s u a s iv e w itn e ss (so long a s the p e rs u a s io n fa v o rs the side u sin g h im )

should be p re s e n te d e a r ly , say the p r a c t i t io n e r s . The re a so n m o s t

f re q u e n tly g iven fo r th is o r d e r is th a t the re c e p tiv ity of the ju ry i s fe lt

to b e h ig h e s t e a r ly in the t r i a l b e fo re it can b eco m e t i r e d , b o re d , o r

b la s e .

T h e re i s no doubt am ong the p r a c t i t io n e r s th a t the w ay in w hich

te s tim o n y is p re s e n te d w ill in fluence the ju d g m en t of the p ro b a tiv e value

of i t a s ev id en ce . To i l lu s t r a te , the sam e te s tim o n y com ing f ro m two

d if fe re n t w itn e s se s m ay have d iffe re n t e ffe c ts upon the ju ry in m ak ing

the d e c is io n . To c a r r y th is d iffe re n tia tio n to the e x tre m e , one re c e n t

c o m m e n ta to r in d ic a te s th a t if an a t to rn e y 's w itn e s s e s f i t the follow ing

a d je c tiv e s , he h a s l i t t le to w o rry about: w is e , in te ll ig e n t, p o ised ,

C. R eed , 0£ . c i t . , pp . 250; 259.

^^^H enry H ard w ick e , o£. c i t . , p . 82.

240

re a so n a b le , c o u ra g e o u s , co n fid en t, tru s tw o rth y , u p r ig h t, m o d e st,

com posed , q u ie t, se d a te , s im p le , g ra c io u s , re fin e d , u n affec ted , p r o ­

found, d e l ib e ra te , s e r io u s , e lo q u en t, in c is iv e , zind e n th u s ia s tic . On

the o th e r hand , the a tto rn e y should be co n cern ed abou t any w itn e sse s

who cou ld b e d e s c r ib e d by the follow ing w ords: a r ro g a n t , in so len t,

d ic ta to r ia l , d o m in e e rin g , v a in , o v e rb e a rin g , pom pous, con tem ptuous,

b lu s te r in g , n o isy , g a r ru lo u s , b o a s tfu l, shallow , s u p e rf ic ia l , i r r a t io n a l ,

p re ju d ic e d , s e rv i le , faw ning , o b seq u io u s , in g ra tia tin g , w eak , w itle s s ,

d u ll, and fe a r fu l . In m o re r e s t r a in e d language, the sam e au th o r

d is c u s s e s the p o s s ib le p e r s u a s iv e im p a c t of the m a n n e r of p re se n ta tio n

of w itn e sse s by saying

. . . th e a p p e a ra n c e of the w itn e ss w ill have a b e a r in g on the e ffec t of h is te s tim o n y ; h is a b ility to p re s e n t fa c ts c le a r ly and in a p e r s u a s iv e fa sh io n m u s t b e c o n s id e red ; h is g e n e ra l in te llig e n c e and ab ility to h an d le the sk illfu l c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of opposing co u n se l m u s t be w eighed so th a t h is e ffe c tiv e n e ss m ay n o t b e d e s tro y e d and y o u r c a se w eakened by a d ra m a tic c o lla p se u n d e r c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n .

If , in an sw erin g q u e s tio n s , a w itn e ss d e lay s too long to d e lib e ra te

on h is a n s w e r , i t i s f e l t th a t the c o u r t and ju ry w ill a s su m e th a t he is n o t

being e n tire ly cand id . I t i s b e lie v e d th a t o v e r -d e lib e ra tio n on a n sw e rs

i s a s ign of r e f re s h in g the m e m o ry of a p re p a re d te s tim o n y . M o reo v er,

too m uch d e lay in the p r o g re s s of the tes tim o n y w ill ten d , i t i s s ta te d by

R . L o r ry , og, c i t . , pp . 67-68 . l^ S i b id . , p . 24.

241

the p r a c t i t io n e r s , to lo se the a tte n tio n of judge and ju ry and th e re fo re

1 2 Aw eaken the in te r e s t in the c a s e . A lso , the d r e s s of the w itn e ss is

b e lie v e d to in flu en ce h is c re d ib ili ty . T he m o s t im p o rta n t w itn e s s e s

should be cau tio n ed no t to d r e s s in gaudy o r unusually s tr ik in g clothing

fo r fe a r i t w ill a t l e a s t d e t r a c t f ro m the te s tim o n y , and a t m o s t cau se

a p re ju d ic e a g a in s t the w itn e s s . A bove a l l , expensive and f la sh y jew e lry

127should no t be w o rn b y the p e r s o n te s tify in g .

F in a lly , th e c re d ib ili ty of the w itn e ss w ill be p u t to a s e v e re te s t

u n d e r c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n . T h is w ill la rg e ly be d isc u s se d in a follow ing

se c tio n , b u t fo r the t im e , i t should be no ted th a t the w itn e ss who allow s

h im se lf to b e d raw n in to show ing i l l te m p e r by the c r o s s - e x a m in e r is

128ex p ec ted to lo se c re d ib ili ty in the e y es of the ju ry .

The r h e to r ic a l ta s k of the a tto rn e y du rin g d ire c t ex am in a tio n is a

unique one in m an y w ay s. F o r ex a m p le , m o s t com m only if one i s to

p e r fo rm a p e r s u a s iv e ta s k he n eed .o n ly b e in co n tro l of h im s e lf . The

la w y e r , in th is c a s e , m u s t d raw p e r s u a s iv e com m unica tion f ro m ano ther

p e rs o n m uch a s a m u s ic ia n b r in g s m u s ic fro m an in s tru m e n t. Speaking

m e ta p h o r ic a lly , th e n , a t r i a l la w y e r m u s t p lay the w itn e ss so th a t the

te s tim o n y i s n o t in d is c o rd w ith the e n t i r e p o s itio n be in g p r e s e n te d by

the a tto rn e y . He m u s t ob ta in enough f ro m the w itn e ss to fu lf il l the ro le

126H ickam and S can lon , op. c i t . , p . 278.

1 2 7 ib id ., p . 278. ^^^ Ib id ., p . 284.

242

w hich h as been a s s ig n e d to the p a r t ic u la r w itn e ss . He is c a re fu l no t to

go fu r th e r fo r f e a r of e i th e r b o r in g the aud ience o r b rin g in g fo rth

ad d itio n a l te s tim o n y w hich w ill dam age the c a s e . He (the law yer)

m u s t fu rn ish th e ju ry enough te s tim o n y on each p o in t to win th e ir b e lie f;

he m u s t not d u p lica te te s tim o n y on the sam e p o in t beyond n e c e s s ity fo r

f e a r of a ro u s in g b o red o m o r a su sp ic io n th a t he p ro te s ts too m uch on

thi,s po in t,

When suddenly faced w ith the u n fa m ilia r su rro u n d in g s of the

c o u r t and the u n fa m ilia r ro le of the w itn e s s , the re sp o n se of the in d iv i­

d ual m ay re q u ire a s s is ta n c e f ro m the exam in ing co u n se l to m a in ta in the

te s tim o n ia l v a lu e of the w itn e ss . Som e p e rso n s a r e u n d ers tan d ab ly aw ed

by the s itu a tio n and n eed a good d e a l of en co u rag em en t to say w hat they

know. In such a c a s e , the a tto rn e y b eg in s w ith q u es tio n s e a sy to a n sw e r--

n a m e , a d d re s s , o ccupation , fa m ily , e tc , - - s o a s to tak e the w d tness’

m in d off the ch a llen g e of the c o u rtro o m and p e r m it h im to re la x .

O ther w itn e s s e s re sp o n d in qu ite an o p posite w ay. F o r one of the

few tim e s (if n o t the only tim e) the ind iv idual fin d s h im se lf the c e n te r of

a tten tio n in an im p o rta n t p ro c e e d in g . He h a s som eth ing to o ffe r to the

cau se of ju s tic e and i t goes to h is h ead , "We a r e then co n fro n ted w ith

S, S tew art, o£, c i t . , p . 174.

L , W ellm an, D ay in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p , 145,

C. R eed , og, c i t . , p . 260.

243

an exh ib ition e n tire ly out of keep ing w ith the p e rso n a li ty of the w itn e ss

a s we had o b se rv e d i t th e re to fo re and b e liev ed i t to b e , U nder th e se

c irc u m s ta n c e s the w itn e ss " , , , b eco m es s tim u la te d to the p o in t of

e x h i la r a t io n ,” "U n le ss th is w itn e ss , , , i s so b e re d o r c u rb ed , he m ay

do in ca lcu lab le dam age to the s ide ca llin g h im , ” I t m ay even be n e c e s ­

s a ry to w ith d raw the w itn e ss te m p o ra r i ly to a llo w an opportun ity to ta lk

to h im out of h e a r in g of the c o u r t, I t goes a s obvious th a t the la w y e r

m u s t re m a in in c a lm c o n tro l of h im se lf th ro u g h o u t the ex am in atio n . He

m u s t luiow w hat in fo rm a tio n each w itn e ss h a s to o ffe r and how he h a s

p lanned to ob ta in i t and in w hat o rd e r . T h is r e q u ire s a c e r ta in am o u n t

of m a tu r i ty and com m and , I t is a lso the function of the a tto rn e y to

s itu a te h im se lf , w hile q u es tio n in g , to en co u rag e lis te n in g by the j u r y - -

they should be ab le to see and h e a r the w itn e ss ,

If by d es ig n o r s u rp r is e i t happens th a t a h o s ti le w itn e ss i s c a lle d

to te s tify , th e re a r e v a r io u s w ays reco m m en d ed fo r dealing w ith h im . In

g e n e ra l, i t i s su g g ested th a t c o u r te sy and b re v ity w ill d ea l b e s t w ith such

a s itu a tio n . If the w itn e ss unexpected ly changes f ro m frien d ly to h o s ti le ,

l i t t le can b e done ex cep t to in d ica te th a t he once cam e to the a t to rn e y 's

R, L o r r y , o£, c i t . , pp , 65 -66 ,

, p , 66, g, S tew a rt, og. c i t , , p , 175,

L , W ellm an , Day in C o u rt, op. c i t . , pp . 145-146.

244

office and l e t the ju ry conclude th a t he h a s th u s changed h is te s tim o n y .

In r a r e c a s e s the co u n se l i s u rg e d to take an a g g re s s iv e a ttitu d e to w ard

a h o s ti le w itn e ss and th u s o b ta in u se fu l te s tim o n y , b u t i t i s b e lie v ed th a t

tliis i s in freq u e n tly d e s ir a b le ,

T h roughou t the d i r e c t ex am in a tio n the lav /y er i s ad v ise d to keep

h im se lf in the b ack g ro u n d . I t i s the ev id en ce , and th u s the w itn e ss , th a t

is c a llin g fo r a tten tio n , an d the a tto rn e y does h is c a s e a d is s e rv ic e if he

d is t r a c ts f ro m th a t a tte n tio n . I t m ay happen th a t an opponent m ak es

h im se lf i r r i t a t in g th rough c o n s ta n t o b jec tio n s and b y p e rs o n a l r e m a rk s

a d d re s s e d to the o th e r la w y e r . In th is c a s e , i t is w ise to ig n o re the

r e m a rk s and re fu se to be d raw n in to b ick e rin g o v e r p o in ts of law . In

the long ru n , the i r r i ta t in g a tto rn e y w ill do h im se lf m o re h a rm than g o o d i^

F in a lly , the law y e r m u s t r e s i s t a rg u in g h is c a se a s the ev idence

is p r e s e n te d . T h is is unde s ira b le both b ec au se i t w eak en s the e ffe c t of

the c a s e a s a w hole u n it p r e s e n te d in an e ffec tiv e o r d e r and b e ca u se i t

g ives the opponent a runn ing acco u n t of the s tra te g y of the c a s e .

In co n c lu sio n , i t i s c le a r ly e s ta b lish e d th a t th e su b m iss io n of

ev idence c o n s titu te s a c o m p lex and s ig n ifican t p a r t of the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s .

E v id en ce s e rv e s both a d ia le c t ic a l and a rh e to r ic a l fu n c tio n . D ia le c tic a l,

S, S tew art, op . c i t , , p , 175; S, W e iss , 0£ , c i t , , p , 67;J , C, R eed , op, c i t , , p . 265 -266 ,

S, S tew art, 0£ , c i t . , p . 176.

245

in the se n se th a t i t i s p a r t of an in v e s tig a tiv e p r o c e s s to le a rn of fa c ts

w hich h av e o c c u r re d in p a s t t im e . R h e to rica l, in the sen se th a t a d v o c a te s

s e le c t and p r e s e n t the ev id en ce in su ch a w ay a s to win b e lie f f ro m the

d ecid ing p a r t i e s . The ru le s of a d m is s ib il i ty a r e s e t up to enhance the

d ia le c tic a l n a tu re of the p r o c e s s . T he a d v o c a te s , o p e ra tin g w ith in the

co n tex t of the r u le s , se e k to o b ta in the g r e a te s t p o ss ib le rh e to r ic a l

e ffe c t. T he p r o c e s s of p re s e n tin g f a c ts to the judge and ju ry i s by no

m e a n s c o m p le te , h o w ev e r, u n til c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n is g iv en a chance

to o p e ra te a s a m o d e ra tin g fo rc e upon the te s tim o n y .

C ro s s -E x am in a tio n

C ro s s -e x a m in a tio n i s c e r ta in ly the m o s t p o p u la r a s p e c t of

ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m a k in g . T h is i s so p ro b a b ly b e cau se th e re is so m uch

d ra m a in c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n . The ex c ite m e n t of th is type of q u estio n in g

co m es f ro m the fa c t th a t i t i s a d i r e c t duel b e tw een w itn e ss and c o u n se l.

If, in d e s c r ib in g the d i r e c t ex am in a tio n the m e ta p h o r of a la w y e r be in g a

m u s ic ia n w as p e rm it te d , th en fo r c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n the a tto rn e y m ay be

d e s c r ib e d a s a f is h e rm a n . F i r s t , he w o rk s the w itn e ss to tak e h is b a i t ,

and w hen i t i s tak en the " f ish " m u s t b e p lay ed sk illfu lly if h e i s to be

b ro u g h t in a g a in s t h is w ill. T h e re i s a s tro n g in c lin a tio n am ong the p r a c ­

tic in g a tto rn e y s to say th a t c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n i s an a r t , depending fo r

i t s s u c c e s s upon the sk il l and w it of the co u n se l. S till, the ra tio n a le

Ij, W ellm an , S u c c e ss in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 124.

246

of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n can be e x p re s s e d and the p ro c e s s and m eth o d can

be d is c u s s e d . One w r i te r , in fa c t, ta k e s d ire c t ex cep tion w ith the

d e s c r ip tio n of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n a s an a r t . He n o tes th a t th e re i s , to

be s u re , o p p o rtu n ity fo r d isp lay of w it, ta c t , sh re w d n e ss , keen o b s e rv a ­

tio n , u n d e rs ta n d in g , and the lik e . B u t in h is m ind good t r i a l la w y e rs

depend l e s s on a r t and m o re on so lid p re p a ra tio n , "T hey w ork h a rd to

m a s te r the su b jec t in litig a tio n , they know th e ir fa c ts and re a l iz e f ro m

c a re fu l stu d y ju s t w h ere they w ant to a r r iv e and ju s t w hat po in t they w ant

to m ak e .

T he o b je c t of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n i s to p e rm it th e opposing co u n se l

to m o d e ra te , m od ify , o r r e je c t the ev idence sub m itted a g a in s t h is cau se

by each w itn e s s . C ro ss -e x a m in a tio n is fe lt to be a s tro n g s e c u rity

a g a in s t in c o m p le te , d is to r te d , o r fa ls e ev idence , One su c c e ss fu l

p r a c t i t io n e r goes so f a r a s to d e s c r ib e i t a s the g r e a te s t le g a l engine

e v e r in v en ted fo r the d isc o v e ry of t ru th , C ro s s -e x a m in a tio n i s fe l t

to b e e ffec tiv e in exposing tru th in v a r io u s w ays. It m ay fo rc e a w itn e ss

to abandon a p r e p a re d p o s itio n and im p ro v ise h im se lf in to rev ea lin g fa c ts

he w ish ed to w ithhold . I t m ay so m odify h is b eh av io r a s to convince the

judge and ju r y th a t h is a c tio n s a r e th o se of a d ish o n es t m an . It m ay be

S. S tew art, og. c i t . , p . 219,

^^^H enry H ard w ick e , og, c i t . , p , 138.

1 4 lT h is s ta te m e n t, o r ig in a lly a ttr ib u te d to F . L . W ellm an in h is n o ted A r t of C ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , i s r e i te r a te d and su p p o rted by an eq u a lly s u c c e ss fu l t r i a l law y er of m o re r e c e n t t im e s - -L . P . S try k e r , op. cit.,pk 73.

247

n e c e s s a ry to d e te rm in e th a t a w itn e ss who is e m b a r ra s s e d o r confused

is n o t d is to r tin g te s tim o n y in ten tio n a lly o r , on the o th e r hand , to d e te r ­

m in e th a t a w itn e ss who a p p e a rs to b e the v e ry e s se n c e of h o n es ty is

t ru ly an acco m p lish e d l i a r , "The p sy c h o lo g ic a l a s p e c ts a r e in trig u in g

and l im i t le s s ," r e p o r ts one su c c e ss fu l c o n te m p o ra ry a tto rn e y . "The

ju r y 's in s t in c t , " he co n tin u es , "b a se d on com m on e x p e r ie n c e , d e te rm in e s

the re a c tio n . It i s the la w y e r 's duty to p ro v id e enough g r i s t fo r the

m il l . >i 142

T h u s, the th e o re t ic a l a ssu m p tio n upon w hich the techn ique of

c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n r e s t s i s th a t once g iven a f re e chance to r e p o r t on

w hat p u rp o r ts to be f i r s t- h a n d k n o w le d g e --s ta te d in fu ll and w ithou t the

e m b e llish m e n t of ju d g m e n ts - -a w itn e ss can b e s t be te s te d fo r a c c u ra c y

by ex p o su re to the q u e s tio n s of an opposing a tto rn e y , in the p re s e n c e of

the ju d g e , ju ry , an d the in d iv id u a l a g a in s t whom the te s tim o n y i s d ire c te d .

If th e re have b een o m iss io n s (in ten tio n a l o r o th e rw ise ) the gaps w ill be

fille d ; if th e re h av e b een d is to r t io n s , they w ill be c o r re c te d ; if the

in d iv id u a l te s tify in g i s unw orthy of b e lie f in g e n e ra l, he w ill be ex p o sed .

On the o th e r hand , p re su m a b ly , if the w itn e ss h as re p o r te d h is e x p e r ie n c e s

a c c u ra te ly and h o n e s tly the c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n w ill n o t u n fa irly w eaken

th is ev idence,

N iz e r , o£. c i t . , p . 421.

143J . W. D onovan, op. c i t . , p . 228.

248

O nce the ph ilo so p h y of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n h a s b een s ta te d , i t i s

n e c e s s a ry to exam ine v a r io u s m e th o d s of p ro c e d u re to gain an u n d e r ­

s tand ing of the im p lied rh e to r ic a l th e o ry . U n fo rtu n a te ly , th e re i s no t

a s m u ch d is c u s s io n of a c tu a l p r in c ip le s of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n a s m ig h t

b e im ag in ed c o n s id e rin g the im p re s s iv e n u m b er of w o rd s w hich have

b e e n devo ted to th e su b je c t. A cco rd in g to one a u th o r , " th is s itu a tio n is

acco u n ted fo r by the f a c t th a t m uch invo lved in sk ill in c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n

m u s t b e a c q u ire d f ro m e rq ie rien ce and canno t be e a s ily co m m u n ica ted by

the p r in te d p ag e . I t m ig h t a lso be added p a re n th e tic a lly th a t the

la c k of sy s te m a tic and c a re fu l in v e s tig a tio n m ig h t a lso acco u n t fo r th is

la c k . I t i s c e r ta in ly a p p a re n t f ro m a g lance a t the books w ritte n on th e

su b je c t th a t m o s t of the in s tru c tio n i s in th e fo rm of ex am p les . If a l l

the i l lu s tr a t io n s of fam o u s c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n s w e re rem o v ed fro m the

b o o k s , l i t t le w ould re m a in . A s i t i s , they m ak e fo r in te re s tin g re a d in g ,

b u t re v e a l l i t t le in the w ay of p r in c ip le s .

F ro m a study of the h in ts and su g g es tio n s g iven by su c c e ss fu l

la w y e rs , i t i s p o ss ib le to v iew c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n a s a gam e s itu a tio n .

The gam e b e g in s by an id e n tif ic a tio n of r o le s - - th e w itn e ss a t l e a s t i s

id e n tif ied in fa v o r of h is own te s tim o n y and fre q u e n tly id e n tif ie s h im se lf

^^"^Asher L . C o rn e liu s , The C ro s s -E x a m in a tio n of W itn esses (Ind ianapo lis: T he B o b b s -M e rr i l l Com pany P u b l is h e r s , 1929), p . 1.

249

in b eh a lf of th e s ide w hich h a s c a lle d h im to te s tify ; th e a tto rn e y c r o s s -

exam in ing i s the opponent. To th e e x ten t one g iv es in , the o th e r g a in s .

T h is re la tio n sh ip i s c le a r ly m o re t ru e in the c a se of a p e r ju re d w itn e s s ,

b u t u su a lly o c c u rs even though the w itn e ss h a s s im p ly r e la te d an e x p e r -

145ien ce to the b e s t of h is a b ility .

B e fo re the gam e can b e g in , the a t to rn e y opposing the te s tim o n y

m u s t d ec id e w h e th e r to g am b le on p la y in g --d o e s the chance of ga in o ffse t

the chance of lo s s ? To w hat ex ten t h a s h is p o s itio n b ee n d am ag ed b y the

te s tim o n y ? If th e re h a s b e e n l i t t le o r no d am ag e , i t i s fo o lish to c r o s s -

exam ine an d iru n a r i s k of in c u r r in g lo s s . T he r e p o r ts of the a tto rn e y s

s ta te th a t m o re c a s e s a r e lo s t by a tto rn e y s lo s in g the c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n

gam e th an a r e won b y a s u c c e ss fu l job of q u es tio n in g . T h is i s a d iff i­

cu lt d e c is io n fo r a la w y e r to m ak e . T h e re a lw ay s se e m s to b e an u rg e

to have a go a t e v e ry w itn e ss ju s t in c a se som eth ing m ig h t be ac co m p lish e d .

T h is i s c o n s id e re d a d an g ero u s c o u rse fo llow ed only by in e x p e rie n c e d o r

in e ffec tiv e c b o s s - e x a m in e rs .

If , h o w ev er, the co u n se l d e te rm in e s to c ro s s -e x a m in e a w itn e s s ,

he m u s t do so only if he h a s m ad e th e p ro p e r p re p a ra t io n . In the f i r s t

^ ^ % i d . , p . 52.

L . W ellm an , D ay in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 181; J . C. R eed , op. c i t . , p . 276.

L . W ellm an , S u c c ess in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 125.

250

p la c e , i t i s n e c e s s a ry th a t he u n d e rs ta n d h is o p p o n en t's p o s itio n a s w e ll

a s h is own. 148 Q u es tio n s should not be a sk e d u n le s s the a n sw e r is

known a t the h ig h es t le v e l of p ro b ab ility and u n le s s the a n sw er w ill co n ­

tr ib u te to the cau se of the q u e s tio n e r m o re th an i t h e lp s the side th a t

c a lle d th e w itn e ss , 149 E v e ry d e ta il and d o cu m en t m u s t b e s tu d ied and

c a te g o r iz e d so a s to b e a v a ila b le to the q u e s tio n e r on s h o r t n o tice . The

q u e s tio n e r h im se lf m u s t f i l l h is m ind w ith th is in fo rm a tio n so th a t he

can know w hat is a v a ila b le and use i t w hen a p p ro p r ia te , 1^® S o m etim es

th is am o u n ts to an am az in g am ount of d a ta th a t m u s t b e p r e p a re d by the

a t to rn e y , b u t each ad d itio n b r in g s h im c lo s e r to the lik e lih o o d of a

s u c c e ss fu l c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , "T h is , in the l a s t a n a ly s is , i s the 'a r t '

of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n - - th o ro u g h p re p a ra tio n , "1^1

In c o n te m p o ra ry p ra c t ic e , no e3q>erienced t r i a l law y e r " , , ,

w ould th ink of p ro c ee d in g to t r i a l w ithout dem and ing fu ll d is c lo s u re f ro m

h is opponent th rough th e d isc o v e ry p ro c e d u re s , "152 T hrough th is p r o c e s s ,

a la w y e r m ay dem and to be p e rm itte d to see v i ta l docum ents to be u sed

a g a in s t h im and he m ay dem and to b e p e rm it te d to q u es tio n the opposing

1 4 8 a , I j , C o rn e liu s , o£, c i t , , pp , 26; 29,

149H enry H ard w ick e , og. c i t , , p , 166,

1 5 0 l , N iz e r , 0£o c i t , , p , 333, l ^ l lb id ,

152H ickam and Scanlon , o£, c i t , , p , 91.

251

c lie n t and p o ten tia l w itn e s se s . In e s s e n c e , an a tto rn e y m ay do h is

e x p lo ra to ry c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n b e fo re the t r i a l when an e r r o r w ill not

d e s tro y h is p o s itio n in the ey es of the ju ry . A lso , he th u s develops a

t r a n s c r ip t of o ffic ia l te s tim o n y w hich m ay be u sed to d is c r e d i t opposing

w itn e ss d u rin g the t r i a l . (R ules fo rb id sim ply e n te r in g such a t r a n s c r ip t

in to the r e c o rd , b u t i t m ay be u se d d u rin g question ing if a p ro p e r foun­

d ation i s la id by in q u irin g of the w itn e s s w h eth er he m ad e the re c o rd e d

s ta te m e n t, T h u s,, un d er m o d e rn ru les^ th e re i s no ex cu se fo r an

a tto rn e y n o t to b e fu lly acq u a in ted w ith a ll in fo rm a tio n re la t in g to the

c a s e , even to the po in t of having a p re l im in a ry c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n on

r e c o rd .

N ext in the p ro c e s s co m es the d ec is io n as to the o rg an iza tio n of

the c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n and the m a n n e r of beginning . F i r s t , a l l a g re e i t

i s n e c e s s a r y to fo rm u la te an o b jec tiv e and s tick to i t . A lthough th e re

w ill so m e tim es be h o u rs of q u es tio n s betw een each s tep in the p lan , i t i s

n e v e r th e le s s v a lu ab le to hold to p lan n ed o b jec tiv e s . S o m etim es i t i s

a s good to s ta r t c ro s s q u es tio n s a t the s ta r t of the te s tim o n y and exam ine

in the o rd e r in w hich the w itn ess p re s e n te d i t . On the o th e r hand , i t m a y

be v a lu ab le by question ing f i r s t th a t te s tim o n y w hich w as given la s t ,

^^^I b id , , p , 112. L . C o rn e liu s , 0£ . c i t , , p , 18.

N iz e r , o£. c i t . , p. 346.

252

H ere the rationale is that th is p a r t of the story is m ost fre sh in the mind

of the ju ry and a stunning v ictory over the w itness in such a d istinct p a rt

of the testim ony m ight be m ore destructive than if saved until la te r .

In other cases , a stra tegy is recom m ended which is called going "for

the jugular, " That is , ignoring a ll the m inor points and moving stra ig h t

into an exam ination of the essence of the d ire c t testim ony. Still

another technique is to s ta r t by exposing a se rie s of untruths which m ay

individually be triv ia l but in rap id combination tend to destroy the c re d i­

b ility of the w itness quickly.

W hatever stra tegy is finally selected by the att orney will depend

upon h is evaluation of the ch arac te r of the w itness. A good c ro s s ­

exam iner m ust be p rep ared to make judgm ents about individuals of widely

differing types. This conflicts with the a sse rtio n made e a r lie r in the

chapter that a lawyer could lea rn m ost about human nature by studying

h im self and projecting those conclusions to o thers. In the f ir s t p lace ,

through the discovery m echanism s it is possible to am ass data about

age, education, employment, associa tions, fam ily, po litics, and the like

about the w itness well before the actual t r ia l . T here is no excuse fo r a

c ro ss-ex am in er to face a s tran g er in the courtroom . ^^9 Added to th is

S, S tew art, og. c i t . , p. 225.

157Xj, N izer, op. c i t . , p. 60. ^^^Ibid.

^®^A. Li. C ornelius, op. cit. , p. 35.

253

in fo rm a tio n i s the a n a ly s is of the a tto rn e y h im se lf a s he w atch es the

w itn e ss d u rin g te s tim o n y b e fo re and d u rin g the t r i a l . An a t to rn e y should

b e p r e p a re d to u n d e rs ta n d the p e rsp e c tiv e of th ese in d iv id u a ls - - to pu t

h im se lf in th e ir ro le and p re d ic t a re sp o n se to c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n ,

F u r th e r m o r e , the o b se rv a tio n of a w itn e s s ' body, fa c e , h an d s , e y e s ,

l ip s , m o v em en ts of h an d s and fe e t w hile an sw erin g q u es tio n s m ay re v e a l

a w eak n ess in c h a r a c te r o r te s tim o n y , T h is ad m on ition a r i s e s f ro m

a th e o ry th a t c e r ta in p h y s ic a l a c tio n s a c t a s signs of ag ita tio n re su lt in g

f ro m fa ls e te s tim o n y . A lthough a cunning l i a r w ill a ttem p t to co n cea l

such s ig n s , n e v e r th e le s s , th e e y e s , to n es of the v o ic e , and th e m outh

a r e the b e s t in d ex es to the s ta te of m in d of the w itn e ss , "A co n v u lsiv e

tw itch in g of the m u s c le s of the m ou th w ill o ften b e tra y ag ita tio n w hich

the w itn e ss w ish e s to c o n c e a l, w hile the eye w ill r e v e a l no th ing , , , , ^

O bviously , co n s ta n t a tte n tio n m u s t b e g iven to the a c tu a l te s tim o n y of

the w itn e ss to no te c o n tra d ic tio n s , o m is s io n s , and o th e r e r r o r s of t e s t i ­

m ony w hich w ill c a ll fo r the a tte n tio n of the c ro s s -e x a m in e r . One lead ing

p r a c t i t io n e r p r e p a re s a c h a r t w hich in c lu d e s the v i ta l p o in ts of the t e s t i ­

m ony and b e s id e each one a r e l is te d any in c o n s is te n c ie s m ade by the

^^^I b i d , p . 36, W e iss , o£, c i t , , p , 121,

162 jjen ry H ard w ick e , o£, c i t , , p , 153,

254

w itn e ss in p rev io u s te s tim o n y , in the p r e - t r i a l d ep o s itio n , o r any o th e r

163do cu m en ts av a ilab le .

W ith th ese p r e l im in a r ie s fin ish ed , the gam e b eg in s . A s the

a tto rn e y ap p ro ach es the w itn e s s , he m u s t d e te rm in e h is own m a n n e r of

q u es tio n in g . E ith e r a sav ag e , v ic io u s , and te r r ify in g ap p ro ach o r a

f r ie n d ly , co n c ilia to ry one m ay be u se d . I t s e e m s m o re com m on to

b e lie v e th a t the fo rm e r i s m o re e ffec tiv e , b u t the te s tim o n y of the p r a c ­

t i t io n e r s fa v o rs the l a t t e r , F ra n c is L . W ellm an, an o ft-q u o ted

w r i te r on c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , how ever, cam e to b e lie v e tow ard the end

of h is c a r e e r th a t in c e r ta in c a se s b ro w b ea tin g a w itn e ss w as the m o s t

e ffec tiv e m ean s of fo rc in g ou t the tru th , No ru le of thum b i s g iven

fo r choosing betw een the two a p p ro a ch es , and m u s t be le f t to the in d iv id u al.

One c r i te r io n govern ing the se le c tio n of the la w y e r 's ap p ro ach

to the w itn e ss , h o w ev er, i s th e need to im p re s s the judge and ju ry th a t

the w itn e ss is being f a ir ly d e a lt w ith . In th e c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n g am e ,

the -witness beg ins w ith a p ro b ab le sym pathy fro m the ju ry . He i s p la ce d

in the ro le of the underdog and the a tto rn e y m u s t b e c a re fu l to do nothing

to en co u rag e th a t sym pathy , The ju ry h a s h e a rd a s to ry f ro m the

N iz e r , op, c i t , , pp, 114-115,

^^^H enry H ard w ick e , og. c i t , , p , 188,

165p, W ellm an , S u ccess in C o u rt, op, c i t , , pp, 125-126,

L , C o rn e liu s , og. c i t , , p , 27,

255

w itn e s s , to ld in h is way and p ro b ab ly in a m an n e r b e s t d es ig n e d to

en co u rag e b e lie f . In the m idd le of the s to ry , when the ju ry p ro b ab ly h as

no re a so n to d isb e liev e i t , the opposing co u n se l r i s e s to c ro s s -e x a m in e

and th u s su g g es t th a t th is new acq u a in tan ce m ay be a l i a r . T h is is a

d iff icu lt im ag e to o v e rco m e . The ju ry ten d s m o s t o ften to a ssu m e

the ro le of im p a r t ia l ad ju d ica to r and ex p ec ts the ac tio n s of the a tto rn e y s

to be such th a t e v e ry chance fo r te llin g the tru th is b e ing g iven the w it­

n e s s . None of h is ac tio n s m u s t give the im p re s s io n of su p p re ss in g the

tru th . The a tto rn e y m u s t be v e ry c a re fu l in q u estio n in g c h ild re n ,

w om en, o ld p eo p le , d isab led p e r s o n s , and o th e rs s im ila r ly p ro n e to

w inning sym pathy . N o n -ra tio n a l a s i t m ay seem , th e se ty p es a r e no t

ejq jected to su b m it to the sam e sc ru tin y a s o th e rs . One w r i te r , fo r .

in s ta n c e , w ould no t a tta c k a p r ie s t fo r fe a r the ex am in a tio n would do

m o re h a rm to h is cau se th an good. H ow ever, the sam e w r i te r po in ts

to the n e c e s s ity to gauge the ju r y 's fe e lin g s fo r they m ay change th e ir

sym pathy fo r the w itn ess a s the c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n p ro c e e d s . In one

c a s e , fo r ex am p le , a s ick old m an w as u n d er c ro ss -e x a m in a tio n .^ -^ ,

type m o s t lik e ly to have co m p assio n f ro m the ju ry . A s the q u es tio n s

w ent a lo n g , the w itn ess cam e to be m o re and m o re re v e a le d a s one not

^^^Ib id . S. S tew art, o£. c i t . , p . 231.

^^^Ib id . N iz e r , 0£ . c i t . , p . 141.

256

d e se rv in g of sym pathy . . . T h e re i s a p o in t a t w hich even such a

w itn e ss m ay b e d e a lt w ith a g g re s s iv e ly , and th a t i s w hen he h a s b een so

d is c re d ite d th a t the ju ry a c tu a lly en joys h is d isc o m fitu re . "171 The only

w ay to te l l w hen such a tim e i s re a c h e d is v isu a l a n a ly s is of the m ood of

the ju ry .

D uring the questio n in g th e law y e r h a s the advan tage of co m p le te

c o n tro l of the s itu a tio n , if he ch o o ses to a v a il h im se lf of i t . The way in

w hich the q u es tio n s a r e f ra m e d d e te rm in e s c o n tro l. If the su b stan ce of

the m a t te r u n d er in v e s tig a tio n is p u t in the q u es tio n and s e t out fo r the

w itn e ss to a f f irm o r deny , the q u e s tio n e r re m a in s in c o n tro l. If, on the

o th e r hand , the q u es tio n s a r e o p en -en d ed , s ta r t in g w ith such w o rd s a s

"w hy, " "how, " "w hat, " and the l ik e , i t w ill be the w itn e ss who d e te r ­

m in e s the su b stan ce of the a n s w e r , th e d ire c tio n i t ta k e s , and the tim e

devo ted to i t . In a lm o s t e v e ry c a s e , i t i s to the advan tage of the q u e s ­

tio n e r to u se the fo rm e r type of q u e s tio n and c o n tro l the d ire c tio n of the

q u es tio n in g . Only w hen a w itn e ss h a s b een le d to a p o in t th a t f re e d o m

to e la b o ra te on an an sw e r w ill s im ply m ake m o re f i r m h is im p each m en t

i s i t d e s ira b le to a sk an open q u es tio n . The dev e lo p m en t of a lin e of

q u estio n in g i s a lso m o re e ffec tiv e ly c o n tro lle d if the q u es tio n s a r e kep t

sh o r t and to the po in t. W itn e sse s a r e m o s t f re q u e n tly p e rs o n s of a v e ra g e

in te llig en ce and ed ucation and the q u es tio n s m u s t be p h ra s e d in a fo rm

171•Ibid., p , 352, ^72ibid,, p . 303,

257

and language lik e ly to be u n d e rs to o d . To the ex ten t the sp ec ific questio n

i s u n d e rs to o d , to th a t ex ten t the gu idance of the q u e s tio n e r re m a in s

e ffe c tiv e .

N ot only i s i t d e s ira b le fo r the q u e s tio n e r to be in a c tu a l co n tro l

of the s itu a tio n , i t i s a lso im p o r ta n t th a t the judge and ju ry p e rc e iv e h im

a s b e in g in c o n tro l, w h e th e r he i s o r n o t. A s long a s the ju ry s e e s the

c r o s s - e x a m in e r a s w inning the g am e h is cau se i s ad v an ced . T h u s , th e re

m ay b e t im e s w hen an a n sw e r i t to ta lly the op p o site of th a t ex p ec ted o r

d e s ir e d . The q u e s tio n e r m u s t no t p e rm it the ju ry to see h is c a u se h as

b e en h a rm e d . He m u s t p lay the ro le of one who is a lto g e th e r p le a se d

w ith the c o u rse of e v e n ts . He should a lso have the good se n se to

p e r m it such a w itn e ss (one who h a s begun to s c o re p o in ts a g a in s t the

q u e s tio n e r) q u ie tly to le av e th e s tan d . A com m on m is ta k e i s to continue

1 Cq u es tio n in g such a w itn e ss and m ak e the d ifficu lty ev en w o rse .

T he p ro c e s s of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n goes on, th e n , a t two le v e ls :

one i s an a c tu a l s c ru tin y of th e d i r e c t te s tim o n y to c o r r e c t e r r o r s o r

o m is s io n s , and the o th e r i s the d ra m a p e r fo rm e d fo r b e n e f it of the judge

^^^A. L . C o rn e liu s , op. c i t . , p . 39; W. S, S te w a rt, op. c i t . ,p . 223.

L . W ellm an , Day in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 210; J , C. R eed, op. c i t . , pp . 325-326.

^^^A. L . C o rn e liu s , op. c i t . , p . 128; W. S. S te w a rt, op. c i t . , pp . 233 -235 .

258

and ju ry and d es ig n ed to ex p o se the w itn ess a s one not w orthy of b e lie f .

B oth a r e fe l t n e c e s s a ry to a ra tio n a l ev a lu a tio n of the fa c ts in a c a s e .

S u ccess fo r the a tto rn e y a t e ith e r le v e l m ay d is c r e d i t the value of a

w itn e ss a s a f a c t-g iv e r . I f , th rough c o r re c t io n s and add itions the h a r m ­

fu l e ffec t of the te s tim o n y is o ffse t, the w itn e ss w ill not have c o n tr ib u ted

e ffec tiv e ly to f a c ts n e c e s s a ry to w in the c a s e fo r the side th a t c a lle d h im .

T h is se em s ra tio n a l. On the o th e r hand, if by m eth o d s of g u ile , t r ic k e ry ,

con fusion , r id ic u le , o r h o n e s t escposure an a tto rn e y can d e s tro y w hat is

c a lle d by c la s s ic a l r h e to r ic ia n s the w itn e s s ’ e th o s , the e f fe c tiv e n e ss of

the te s tim o n y is eq u a lly d e s tro y e d . T h is m ay o r m ay no t be ra tio n a l

depending upon the v a lid ity of the m ean s of a tta c k . F o r ex am p le , p r a c ­

t i t io n e rs of law a r e w ell a w a re of the in h e re n t p ro b le m s of hum an

p e rc e p tio n , re c o lle c tio n , and n a r ra t io n . T hey e s ta b lish e la b o ra te ru le s

vnLof a d m iss ib ili ty of ev id en ce in an a ttem p t to c o r r e c t fo r th e se p ro b le m s .

A m ong the ru le s i s one p ro h ib itin g the use of lead in g q u estio n s on d i r e c t

ex am in a tio n , on the a ssu m p tio n th a t th rough th e u se of su g g estio n an

a tto rn e y m ay le a d an h o n e s t w itn e ss to te s tify to f a c ts he w ould n o t have

o th e rw ise . H ow ever, d u rin g c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n suggestion is n o t only

p e rm itte d , i t is the m a in s ta y of the p ro c e s s . S u ccessfu l p ra c t i t io n e r s

r e c a l l w ith p le a s u re the m an y tim e s they h av e le d a w itn ess to expand

H . W igm ore d ev o tes m o s t of h is book on the S c ience of Ju d ic ia l P ro o f to th is type of p ro b le m .

259

upon h is te s tim o n y ag a in and ag a in u n til he h a s , th ro u g h re d u c tio ad

ab su rd u m , ejcposed m uch of i t a s fa b r ic a tio n . To be ab le to supply such

d e ta il fo r a g iven day som e tim e in the p a s t i s good re a so n to a s su m e the

s to ry i s m a d e -u p , T he r e s u l t is the lik e ly re je c tio n of the e n tire ty

of the w itness* te s tim o n y on the a ssu m p tio n th a t if p a r t of the s to ry is

fa lse none of i t should be b e lie v e d . The p ro b le m in th is i s the fa ilu re

of the p r a c t i t io n e r s to o ffe r a m e an s to d is tin g u ish b e tw een the l i a r who

h a s m a d e -u p d e ta ils to su p p o rt an in te n tio n a lly fa lse s to ry and th e h o n e s t

w itn e ss who h a s , th ro u g h su g g estio n , u n in ten tio n a lly e la b o ra te d upon h is

a c tu a l e x p e r ie n c e s .

In th e d ra m a tic p o r tio n of the c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , i t is im p o rta n t

to be s u re the ju ry h a s n o tic ed the im a g in a ry p o r tio n of the te s tim o n y . If

a fa b r ic a tio n w ere to go u n n o ticed , i t s value in d e s tro y in g the c re d ib ili ty

of the w itn e ss w ould be lo s t . T hus one techn ique su g g ested is to so lid ify

a fa b r ic a tio n once i t h a s b ee n a r t ic u la te d . T h a t i s , once the w itn e ss h a s

te s tif ie d to a fa c t the q u e s tio n e r b e lie v e s he can p ro v e to b e f a ls e , the

w itn e ss i s a sk e d to re p e a t the fa c t ag a in and ag a in f ro m e v e ry ang le to

p re v e n t h im f ro m e3q>laining aw ay the e r r o r by som e re a so n a b le ex cu se .

W ith each a n s w e r , the w itn e ss goes d e e p e r in to a co m m itm en t on the

po in t and le s and le s s l ik e ly to deny i t . A nd, w ith each r e - a s s e r t io n , the

177A , L , C o rn e liu s , 0£ , c i t , , pp, 155-156,

260

w itn e ss m oves h im se lf c lo s e r and c lo s e r to im p each m en t. When fin a lly

the law y er sp rin g s h is p ro o f th a t the s ta te m e n t is f a ls e , the w itn e ss i s

d e s tro y e d w ith l i t t le hope of re c o v e ry . T he ju ry i s un lik e ly to b e lie v e

any th ing e lse the w itn e ss sa y s .

S till m o re im p o r ta n t to m ain ta in in g the a ttitu d e of the ju ry i s the

cap ac ity of the q u e s tio n e r to stop w hen he h a s acco m p lish e d h is goal.

T h e re i s a po in t of c lim a x w hich is re a c h e d in c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n w hen

the g r e a te s t am ount of v a lu e h as b een o b ta in ed by a given lin e of q u e s tio n s .

To p ro c e e d fu r th e r on th a t lin e m igh t p e r m it the w itn ess to e3q>lain aw ay

any h a rm th a t h a s b e en done h im o r a t l e a s t to d is t r a c t the a tten tio n of

the ju ry f ro m the p a r t ic u la r conclusion the c ro s s -e x a m in e r h a s o b ­

ta in e d . The ju ry i s n o t tra in e d in th e ev a lu a tio n of te s tim o n y . They

ten d to m ak e fa ir ly g ro s s d is t in c t io n s - - a w itn e ss h a s to ld the tru th o r not;

the fa c t i s a s the w itn e ss sa id o r no t, and so fo r th . S o m etim es a tru ly

s ig n ifican t a c c o m p lish m e n t of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n such as the ex p o su re of

a m a jo r m is s ta te m e n t by the w itn ess m ay b e lo s t in ex tended questio n in g

a ro u n d the p o in t and in the fin a l a n a ly s is co u n t v e ry l i t t le to w ard the

d e c is io n . I t i s f e l t th a t if a v a lid ex p lan a tio n can b e m ad e fo r w hat

N iz e r , og, c i t . , p . 101; S. W e iss , o£, c i t . , p . 119.

L . C o rn e liu s , op. c i t . , p . 34; F . L . W ellm an, D ay in C o u rt, pp . 196; 223.

ISOlbid.

261

h a s b een d raw n f ro m the w itn e s s , then i t can b e m ad e th rough the p ro c e s s

of r e - d i r e c t ex am in a tio n by the co u n se l o r ig in a lly ca llin g the w itn e s s .

T h u s , by cu tting off the w itn e ss b e fo re he can ex p la in a g r e a te r im p a c t

m ay be m ad e on the ju ry and no p ro p e r in fo rm a tio n tru ly lo s t .

A g re a t d ea l i s sa id by p ra c t i t io n e r s ab o u t the v isu a l cu es w hich

a c t a s s ig n s of fa ls if ic a tio n by w itn e s s e s , an d o th e r c h a r a c te r is t ic s of

the in d iv id u a l w hich he lp the q u e s tio n e r . I t h a s a lre a d y b een su g g ested

th a t the e y e s , the m o u th , the v o ic e , m u sc le m o v e m e n ts , h an d s , e t c . ,

m ay re v e a l flaw s in the s to ry o r the c h a ra c te r of the w itn e ss . T he

e x a m in e r i s ex p ec ted to study th e se c lu es c a re fu lly and a d ju s t h is ap p ro ach

a c c o rd in g ly . A w itn e ss m ay be ex pected to v a ry in the s tre n g th w ith

w hich he w ill oppose the o b jec tiv e of the q u e s tio n e r . " T h e re is a p sy c h o ­

lo g ic a l tim e fo r v e n tu re so m e n e s s w ith a w itn e ss . A q u estio n p u t to h im

w hen he i s v ig o ro u s ly r e s i s ta n t m ay be in e ffec tu a l. The sam e q u e s tio n

th row n a t h im w hen he is s tunned and low in m o ra le m ay induce a

co n fess io n . "^^2 x h e r e i s som e d isa g re e m e n t am ong p ra c t i t io n e r s a s to

w hat p h y s ic a l re sp o n se is m o s t re v e a lin g to th e q u e s tio n e r . Som e say

the ey es a r e m o s t in d ic a tiv e . O thersw watch h an d s o r the whole fa c e ,

saying the b e s t l i a r s le a r n f i r s t to co n tro l th e i r e y e s . In a I960 d isc u s s io n

W eiss , o£. c i t . , p . 121; H en ry H ard w ick e , o£. c i t . , p . 153.

N iz e r , og, c i t . , p . 127.

262

of psycho logy in law , D w ight G. M cC arthy concludes th a t " . . . w ith in

re a so n ab le l im its th e re can b e no qu estio n b u t th a t the e x p re ss io n s of

183 . .the face a r e in d ica tiv e of the em o tio n s . " In any ev en t, i t se e m s a s if

m o s t ex p e rien ced c ro s s -e x a m in e r s a d ju s t th e ir s tra te g y in a c c o rd a n c e

w ith th e ir ju d g m en ts of the w ea k n esse s of the w itn e ss b a se d on o b se rv a tio n s

of som e c u e s .

The ju ry a lso w a tch es w itn e sse s . T h e re is no s ing le th e o ry of

w hat c h a r a c te r is t ic s a r e m o s t m ean ingfu l to the m a jo r ity of ju r ie s , b u t

i t i s g e n e ra lly b e liev ed th a t th e p h y s ica l c h a r a c te r is t ic s m en tio n ed above

a re u se d . C u rio u sly , one ex p e rie n c ed advocate n o te s th a t a c to r s r a r e ly

m ake good w itn e ss e s . He ju d g es tha t the a c to r is so co n ce rn ed w ith

m aking a good p e rfo rm a n c e th a t he fa ils to p lay the ro le dem anded by

ju r ie s . T h a t i s , w it, g e s tu r e s , ca lm re sp o n se to the whole s itu a tio n ,

a n sw e rs g iven w ith a f l a i r , do not seem to be effec tiv e in e s ta b lish in g

c re d ib ili ty . On the c o n tra ry , u n so p h is tica ted in d iv id u a ls who a re f r ig h ­

tened o r aw ed by the c o u r tro o m a tm o sp h e re and who re sp o n d qu ie tly and

IQCshyly tend to win m o re confidence fro m ju r ie s .

The v a r io u s w r i te r s on c ro ss -e x a m in a tio n devote c o n s id e ra b le

a tten tio n to d iffe re n t ty p e s of w itn e sse s : p e r ju re d w itn e s s , s a rc a s t ic

18S o u g h t G. M cC arth y , P sycho logy and the L aw (Englew ood C liffs , N . J . : P r e n tic e -H a l l , I960), p . 167.

184f , L . W ellm an, Day in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 204.

N iz e r , o£. c i t . , pp . 127-128.

263

w itn e ss , c h ild re n , f e m a le s , e x p e r ts , h o s tile w itn e s s e s , and so fo rth .

The in d iv id u a l c a s e s can b eco m e so sp ec ific th a t no g e n e ra l p r in c ip le s

m ay be d raw n . I t could b e g e n e ra liz e d th a t i t i s n e c e s s a ry to a d ju s t the

a p p ro ach in question ing to f it the p a r t ic u la r ind iv idual u n d e r ex am in a tio n .

C e r ta in ly , ttb e n questio n in g e x p e r ts f ro m v a r io u s f ie ld s i t i s n e c e s s a ry

fo r the a tto rn e y to in fo rm h im se lf in the f ie ld . C e r ta in ly , the q u e s tio n e r

w ill adop t a d iffe re n t a p p ro ach fo r a w itn e ss judged to be ly ing th an fo r

a w itn e ss judged to be h o n e s tly m is ta k e n . How the ac tu a l a d ju s tm e n t is

m ad e te n d s to v a ry f ro m one p ra c t i t io n e r to a n o th e r ,

In the f in a l a n a ly s is , the gam e of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n is won o r

lo s t by an a tto rn e y depending on the way the ju ry o r judge in te r p r e ts the

a n s w e rs and b eh av io r of the w itn e ss . I t r a r e ly happens th a t a w itn e ss is

a b so lu te ly exposed a s a l i a r , o r an a c c u se d c o n fe sse s on the w itn e ss

187stan d , te le v is io n p ro g ra m s to the c o n tra ry no tw ith stand ing . T h u s ,

i t i s the r e la tiv e c re d ib ili ty of opposing w itn e s s e s , a s m od ified by

c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , w hich fo rm the b a s is fo r ju d g m en ts of fa c t . H ow ever,

th ro u g h th e p e r io d of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , the a tto rn e y s have b een den ied

P a r t ic u la r ly good ex am p les of books d isc u ss in g ad ju s tm e n t to d iffe re n t s itu a tio n s in c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n a r e the follow ing: F , L , W ell­m a n , T ^ A r t of C ro££-Eocam uiation (New Y ork: M acm illan C o , , 1923); and A, L , C o rn e liu s , op, c it.

N iz e r , op, c i t , , pp , 9-12 ,

264

the chance to a rg u e the m e r i t s of th e ir c a s e - - to ad v an ce th e ir own i n t e r ­

p re ta t io n s of the fa c ts and law . T h is i s le f t to the c lo s in g a rg u m en t,

Clo sing A rg u m en t

The function of the f in a l a rg u m e n t is to su m m a riz e the fa c ts

w hich h ave b een p re s e n te d in ev idence and d raw c o n c lu s io n s f ro m th em

w ithou t " , , , s a c r if ic in g em otion o r lucidity,"^® ® T h is s ta te m e n t of

p u rp o se ex p o ses a d iffe re n c e of opin ion a s to the th e o ry of the c lo sin g

a rg u m e n t. T h e re se e m s to b e som e co n flic t b e tw een the d isap p ro v a l of

o ld -fa sh io n e d o ra to ry , the ap p ro v a l of fa c t and lo g ic , and the p r a c t ic a l

e ffe c tiv e n e ss of w inning b e lie f f ro m the ju ry by any accep tab le m e a n s .

One p ra c tic in g law y er c a lls fo r g r e a te r a tte n tio n to m e th o d s of th ink ing

an d re a so n in g . "T he a b ili ty to th in k c le a r ly and r e a s o n a c c u ra te ly , " he

sa y s , " a r e the fu n d am en ta l and e s s e n tia l q u a lif ic a tio n s of the law -

189y e r , " He say s th a t i t i s im p o rta n t to know la w s , c a s e s , and ru le s of

ev id en ce , b u t " the find ing , p re se n tin g , p ro v in g , d is c u s s in g and in te r ­

p re tin g of c e r ta in fa c ts m ak e up a la rg e p a r t , p e rh a p s fo u r- f if th s o r even

n in e - te n th s of t r i a l s a t law , , . , " The t r i a l la w y e r , he con c lu d es , m u s t

c o n s id e r f i r s t if h is con ten tion i s a su ffic ien t b a s is fo r a su it o r d e fe n se .

^ ^ ^ Ib id ., p , 151,

189A lbert S, O sb o rn , "A C ase Book on T hought and R eason ing , A m e ric a n L aw School R ev iew , V ol. 5 (M ay, 1925), p . 534,

265

and then w h e th e r o r not th e re e x is ts a re a so n a b le p ro b a b ility of i t being

acc e p te d by the c o u r t.

F ro m a sp eech f i r s t d e l iv e re d in 1921 b u t c o n s id e re d so v aluab le

a s to d e s e rv e re p r in tin g in 1947, i t i s le a rn e d th a t,

n ex t to th e a d v o c a te 's w illin g n e ss to se iz e upon, an a ly ze and u n d e rs ta n d the d e ta ils of the c a s e w hich he i s p re p a r in g fo r t r i a l . . . n ex t in the a rm o u ry of the advocate [ i s J the p ow er to s e le c t out of th is v a s t m a s s of d e ta il the th in g s th a t r e a l ly m a t t e r , and the c o u rag e to r e je c t . . . th e accu m u la tio n of u n n e c e s s a ry m a te r ia l . . . . O th e r th ings b e in g eq u a l, the s h o r te s t a rg u m e n t is the b e s t . ^91

The au th o r g o es on to d e c la re ,

I know i t i s sa id , and som e p eo p le b e liev e i t m o s t fe rv e n tly , th a t s in ce advocacy is the a r t of p e rsu a s io n , the m o s t im p o r ta n t th in g in advocacy m u s t b e the ab ility to m ak e a flo w ery sp ee ch . W ell, f o re n s ic e loquence h a s , so we a re to ld by h is to r ia n s , f lo u r ish e d in v a r io u s a g e s , b u t I canno t b r in g m y s e lf to b e liev e th a t h ig h ly rh e to r ic a l p e r io d s r e a lly e v e r h av e h a d , e i th e r on ju d g e s o r on ju r ie s , qu ite the in fluence w hich h is to r ia n s and b io g ra p h e rs a s s u r e you th ey d id h ave in the c a se of the p a r t ic u la r su b je c t of th e ir a d m ira tio n . A t any r a te , i t i s a p ro d u ce w hich d o es n o t keep . Can anyth ing b e m o re d e p re s s in g th an read in g the ro llin g p e r io d s even of g re a t sp e e c h e s , . . ?

In the c o n c lu s io n of the sp eech , the au th o r in d ic a te s the th e o ry he ho lds

re g a rd in g le g a l a rg u m e n t.

I th in k i t w ill be found th a t fo r ev e ry s o r t of t r ib u n a l i t is fo rc ib le an d o rd e r ly s ta te m e n t f a r m o re than rh e to r ic a l e la b o ra tio n w hich in d u ces b e lie f and e ffec ts p e rsu a s io n ; an d ,

1 9 0 lb id ., p. 535.

1 9 1 v isco u n t S im on, "T he V ocation of an A d v o ca te , " The C anadian B a r R ev iew , XXV (F e b ru a ry , 1947), p . 156.

266

th e re fo re , w hile w e la w y e rs ought to study, to en joy , and w ithin our o p p o rtu n itie s p r a c t is e , the d ifficu lt and d an g e ro u s b u s in e ss of r h e to r ic , I w ould beg ev ery o n e of you • , . esch ew rh e to r ic a s a su b s titu te fo r w ork and b e liev e th a t the e ffec tiv e way in w hich the v o ca tio n of advocacy is follow ed is f a r m o re by devoting y o u rs e lf to p re c is e and a c c u ra te u n d e rs tan d in g of a l l th a t is invo lved in the fa c ts and the law of the c a se and a c le a r and o rd e r ly s ta te m e n t of the co n seq u en ce , th an in the u se of h ig h -so u n d in g and ro tund p h ra seo lo g y . ^92

G iving an o th er su p p o rtin g opinion to the th e o ry th a t le g a l a rg u m e n t should

focus on fa c t and lo g ic is - th e s ta te m e n t w hich fo llow s.

If the c a se i s p ro p e r ly p re p a re d fo r t r i a l and the in s tru c t io n s p ro p e r ly d raw n . . . the a rg u m e n t to the ju ry is o rd in a r i ly con ­fin ed to the f a c t is s u e s p re se n te d by the in s tru c tio n s . The te s tim o n y re la t in g to th e se fa c t i s s u e s should be rev iew ed in a c a re fu l and e ffec tiv e m an n e r and lo g ic a l a rg u m en t in su p p o rt of fav o rab le in fe re n c e s to b e d raw n f ro m the p h y s ica l fa c ts and c irc u m s ta n tia l ev id en ce , should be m ad e . C are should be taken no t to p a tro n iz e o r in su lt the in te llig e n c e of the ju r o r s and log ic and lu c id ity o r re a so n in g should b e r e l ie d upon r a th e r th an v e rb o s ity and v eh em e n ce . A busing the a d v e rs a ry , h is a tto rn e y o r unfavo rab le ta c t ic s u su a lly w ill p re ju d ic e the ju ry in th e i r fav o r w hile if th e i r conduct is r e a l ly re p re h e n s ib le , the ju ry on som e m e m b er of th e ju ry , a t l e a s t , i s ap t to d e te c t i t w ithou t your help .

"The b e s t p u rp o se of o r a l a rg u m en t, " th is au th o r co n c lu d es , " is to em pha­

s ize and to c a ll the a tten tio n of the c o u r t d ire c tly to the v i ta l p o in ts

n e c e s s a ry to the e s ta b lish m e n t of y our th e o r ie s . "^^4

H a r r i s 's H in ts on A dvocacy, p ro b a b ly the m o s t d u ra b le p iec e of

w ritin g on the su b jec t of leg a l advocacy , d e m o n s tra te s m o re p re c is e ly

19 2 ib id ., p . 158.

^^^Claud B , F lo r a , "E ffec tive P re s e n ta t io n of the L aw , " K ansas C ity Law R eview , IV (A p ril, 1936), p . 87.

1 9 4 ib id ., p. 88.

267

the sch izo id n a tu re of thought on the c lo sin g a rg u m e n t. In i t , the w r i te r

s a y s , "I do no t say you should appeal to the p a s s io n s o r sy m p a th ies of a

ju ry , b u t i t i s p e r fe c tly a llow ab le to induce the ju ry to m ake th a t ap p ea l

fo r th e m se lv e s . E la b o ra tin g upon th a t s e n tim e n t, he says

The m an who d ire c t ly so lic its c o m p assio n i s a p o o r ad v o ca te , b u t he who p r e s e n ts the fa c ts of h is c a se so th a t the ju ry m ay re g a rd h is c lie n t w ith th a t sen tim en t i s a g r e a t one. The one know s hum an n a tu re , the o th e r does n o t. The one aw akens y our sym pathy , the o th e r a ro u s e s y o u r co n tem p t.

. . . A t the B a r , ex cep t in r a r e c a s e s , the h ig h e r g ifts of o ra to ry a r e out of p la c e . . . .

On the o th e r hand,, th e re a r e w r i te r s on the th eo ry of the c lo sin g

a rg u m e n t who m ove m o re in the d ire c tio n of p e rs u a s io n and give le s s

e m p h a s is to log ic and f a c t r e s t r ic t io n s . F o r e x a m p le , one w r i te r p u ts

h is p o s itio n th is way: "W hile f lo r id o ra to ry h a s ten d ed to d is a p p e a r ,

t ru e eloquence is s t i l l of su p rem e im p o rta n c e . H is a rg u m e n t is

th a t s im p ly b ec au se f o rm e r p a t te rn s of pub lic speak ing seem r id ic u lo u s

and out of p lace in a l a t e r tim e , th e re i s no re a s o n to b e liev e th a t p r in ­

c ip le s of e ffec tiv e p e rs u a s io n , when u til iz e d in m o d e rn m e th o d s , a r e

n o t su itab le to the le g a l s itu a tio n . O th er than m e th o d s of e ffec tiv e

co m m u n ica tio n th ro u g h d e liv e ry te c h n iq u es , th is a u th o r s t r e s s e s the

n eed to show conv ic tion on the p a r t of the a tto rn e y . A no ther o b s e rv e r

l^ S o e o rg e W. K eeton , H a r r i s 's H in ts on A dvocacy (London: S tevens & Sons, L im ite d , 1943), p . 37,

196xbid.

^ ^ ^ B e rn a rd L . S h ientag , "The T r ia l of a C iv il J u ry A ction in New Y ork , " U nited S ta te s L aw R eview , LXIX (A p ril, 1935), p . 207.

268

notes that the key to an e ffective sum m ary is the rea lization that the

judge or jury are only concerned with finding m a ter ia l on which to b ase

a d ecisio n . The jud icia l p r o c e ss thrusts upon the judge or jury the task

of m aking a d ecision w hether it is d esired or not; whether they have any

in te r e st in the case or not. They approach the c lo sin g argum ents with

the knowledge that soon a d ecision m ust be m ade. They are looking for

a b a s is ’upon which to found the d ecision . A pparently, th is m ay be

rational or a rationalization . The law yer should strive to give it to

them .

The u ltim ate in departure from the rational theory of the final

sum m ation is m ade in a T rea tise on A m erican A dvocacy. T his book,

w hich i s d escribed by its author as an A m erican v ersio n of the noted

w ork on advocacy by the B r itish w riter R ichard H a rr is , dw ells on the

sty le of the final sta tem en t--th e length and structure of sen tences; the

figurative d e v ic e s , the "pleasant rh etorica l flourish" which is "always

accep tab le. "^99 For exam ple , the author m akes the following com m ent

rem in iscen t of B r itish e lo cu tio n ists .

The ad vocate should avo id p a re n th e se s a s m u ch a s p o ss ib le ;but if he em ploy one, le t it be for the purpose of em p h asis.I t r e q u ire s som e s k ill . . . to do th is e ffe c tiv e ly . If done w e ll,

^^®Ijord M acm illan , "Som e O b se rv a tio n s on the A r t of A dvocacy , " T he C anadian B a r R ev iew , XIII (Jan u a ry , 1935), p . 22.

199Alexander H. R obbins, A T rea tise on A m erican A dvocacy (St. L ouis: Central Law Journal Company, 1913), p . 70.

269

h is p a re n th e s is w ill s ta n d ou t like the p r in c ip a l o b jec t of a b r i l l ia n t p y ro te ch n ic d isp la y ; b u t if i l l -p e r f o rm e d , i t w ill be m o re lik e a dam p c e n te rp ie c e , w hich b e c o m e s a f a i lu r e . . . .

A re c o g n itio n of a p o te n tia l co n flic t b e tw een ra tio n a l dec id in g and p e r ­

su a s io n c o m e s f ro m th is a u th o r 's a s s e r t io n th a t in th o se p la c e s w h ere

lo g ic i s w eak a rh e to r ic a l f lo u r is h o r two w ill h ide th.e fa c t. T he au th o r

p r o te s t s .

I t i s n o t m e a n t th a t a ju r y should be a r t i f ic ia l ly o r h y s te r ic a l ly e x c ite d , b u t th a t, by a p ro p e r em p lo y m en t of a r t , the ad v o ca te should c au se th em , n o t m e re ly to h e a r w hat he sa y s , b u t to p e rc e iv e the p ic tu re p a s s in g th rough h is own m in d , and to be qu ick en ed w ith the im p u lse of h is own s e n sa tio n s .

On the o th e r h an d , the sa m e a u th o r say s l a t e r " . . . th a t ap p ea lin g to

the p a s s io n s of a ju ry , in re p ly , in a d ir e c t m a n n e r is out of p la c e and

u n fa ir , "^^2 Y et, the sam e a u th o r s t r e s s e s the im p o rta n c e of d isc o v e rin g

the m o tiv e s of the ju ry . "U n le ss th e se can b e d is c o v e re d ," he s a y s , "the

ad v o ca te w ill be w ork ing in th e d a rk and w ill su c ce ed , if a t a l l , by

203a c c id e n t. " He goes on to sp ecu la te tlia t th e b a s is of d e c is io n v a r ie s

w ith each ju r o r and m ay ra n g e f ro m p re ju d ic e , d is lik in g the lo o k s of one

p a r ty , to s im p ly jo in ing w ith the m a jo r i ty . T h is i s no t a ra t io n a l th e o ry ,

A f in a l re p u d ia tio n of a ra t io n a l th eo ry in the a p p ro ac h to the c lo s in g

a rg u m e n t c o m e s in the fo llow ing s ta tem e n t in the sam e book.

^Q °Ibid. ^O ^Ib id ., p . 71.

ZOZlb id . , p . 109. ^O ^ib^d., p . 193.

270

With a ll the a d v o c a te 's n a tiv e sk ill and ingenu ity i t m ay happen th a t he h a s not su cceed ed w ith h is w itn e s s e s . He could no t m ake th em in te llig e n t. The m o s t pow erfu l im ag in a tio n cannot supply f a c ts . The advocate m ay find out a t l a s t th a t he h a s a w eak c a s e . But w hat th en ? Shall he d e s p a ir? By no m e a n s , if h e h av e le a rn t som eth ing of the a r t he p r a c t ic e s . A w eak ca se and a s tro n g ad v o ca te w ill o ften b e a t a s tro n g c a se and a w eak ad v o ca te . Now the s tre n g th of advocacy l ie s in the ad ap ta tio n of m a te r ia ls to the end d es ig n ed . If the advocate can a d ju s t th em so th a t, a s a w hole, they w ill seem to be t ru e , he w ill w in. The fa c ts m ay be so a r ra n g e d th a t th ey w ill look la r g e r th an they a r e , a l l th in g s be ing la rg e o r sm a ll by c o m p a riso n .

A T re a t is e on A m e ric a n A dvocacy i% to be s u re , o v e r fifty y e a r s old

and m ay not be an e ffec tiv e re p re s e n ta t io n of thought on the le g a l p ro c e s s .

B u t the e s se n c e of the id e a s in th a t book a r e echoed in th o se p u b lish ed

m uch m o re re c e n tly . L ou is N iz e r looks upon the sum m ation a s c le a r ly

a p e rsu a s iv e e f fo r t . He ta lk s of the ru le of p ro b a b ility and how i t is

u se d to p e rsu a d e a ju ry . "The ju ry d ec id es the ca se b ec au se of the ru le

of p ro b a b ility , " N iz e r a s s e r t s . " It [ th e ju r y ] a c c e p ts one v e rs io n a s

205a g a in s t an o th e r b e ca u se i t a c c o rd s w ith i t s own s ta n d a rd of e x p e rie n c e . "

A nother re c e n t co m m en ta to r d is c u s s e s the q u es tio n th is w ay.

I t i s so m e tim e s sa id th a t an ap p ea l to the em otions i s out of p lac e in the law c o u r ts , a s d e tra c tin g f ro m o b je c tiv ity and re a so n . T h is is a re a c tio n a g a in s t the a r t i f ic ia l o ra to ry of the e igh teen th and e a r ly n in e teen th c e n tu r ie s , and is tru e up to a po in t.

^^^I b id . , p . 199. ^®^L. N iz e r , c^ . c i t . , p . 14.

271

It i s e s s e n t ia l , n e v e r th e le s s , th a t the in te llig en ce and the w ill of the l i s te n e r should be b ro u g h t to w ork in con junction in fav o u r of the ad v o ca te ,

T h e re fo re , th e re is re a s o n to b e liev e th a t in sp ite of the p ro te s ta t io n s

a g a in s t th e u se of rh e to r ic (as the la w y e rs u n d e rs ta n d i t to include only

n o n - ra tio n a l p e rsu a s io n ) in c lo sing a rg u m e n ts , the co n sen su s of p r a c t i ­

t io n e rs i s th a t w ith in the l im its im p o se d by the ru le s of the c o u rt, an

a tto rn e y should seek to d isc o v e r a l l th e av a ilab le p ro o fs , includ ing a

c a re fu l r e fe re n c e to the fa c ts of r e c o rd , the sy s te m a tic u se of sound

re a so n in g , and the p r in c ip le s of p e rs u a s io n o th e r than th e s e . T h is , of

c o u rse , i s a r e s ta te m e n t of the A r is to te lia n th eo ry .

Looking m o re sp ec ifica lly a t p r a c t i t io n e r s ' su g g estio n s reg a rd in g

the c lo s in g a rg u m e n t, i t i s p o ss ib le to d is c e rn som e p r in c ip le s . In the

f i r s t p la c e , s im ila r to any p e rs u a s iv e e f fo r t it i s u se fu l to m ake a

ju d g m en t abou t the a ttitu d e of the judge o r ju ry . T ha t i s , to the ex ten t

the a tto rn e y can u n d e rs ta n d w hat p a r t s of h is case have b e e n im p re s s iv e

and w hat p a r t s r e je c te d ; w hat p a r ts m ig h t be advanced b e s t by r e i te ra t io n

only , and w hat p a r t s r e q u ire ex ten s iv e a rg u m en t, to th a t ex ten t he is

m o re lik e ly to p r e s e n t an effec tive c lo s in g speech , In m o s t c a s e s

th e re i s m uch m o re ev idence than can be fu lly su m m a riz e d in the c lo sin g

^^^John H , M unkm an, The T echn ique of A dvocacy (London;S tevens & Sons L im ite d , 1951), p . 149.

C. R eed , o£, c i t . , pp , 367-368; 373.

272

s ta te m e n t. T h u s , i t i s n e c e s s a r y th a t th e advocate study the e n t i re re c o rd

and s e le c t w hat he w ill co v e r in h is su m m atio n . He w ill p e r fo rm

th is se lec tio n w ith som e c r i t e r i a in m in d . F i r s t , he w ill g e n e ra lly

a tte m p t to m agn ify h is own c a se and m in ify h is opponent’s . He w ill

ana lyze h is opponent’s a rg u m e n ts and e v id e n c e , noting th o se w hich have

seem ed to m ak e any im p re s s io n on the ju ry . He w ill be s u re to an sw er

a ll such a rg u m e n ts . In ev a lu a tin g con flic tin g te s tim o n y , the law y er

w ill t ry to show th a t p ro b a b ility fa v o rs h is in te rp re ta tio n . A tto rn e y s

p u t a g re a t d ea l of e m p h a s is upon the j u r y ’s ju d g m en t of w hat se e m s to

m ake s e n se . The s ide th a t d e m o n s tra te s th a t i ts ev idence m a k e s m o re

sen se i s lik e ly to w in. ^ ^

In the c lo sin g sp eech the a tto rn e y w ill be w ise to u s e the re c o rd

of ev idence to su p p o rt h is p o s itio n . T h e re seem s to be g e n e ra l a g ree m e n t

th a t the c lo sin g sp eech i s b e s t w hen i t s tic k s to the ev id en ce and does not

O 1 pm ove off in to ap p e a ls no t d ire c t ly su p p o rte d by te s tim o n y . One

p ra c t i t io n e r h a s a tab le s e t in f ro n t of the ju ry and p la c e s on i t co p ies

2 0 8 f . L i , W ellm an , D ay in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 245.

2 0 9 j, C. R eed , 0£ , c i t . , pp . 366; 378.

210w . S. S tew art, og, c i t . , p . 276.

211s. W e iss , o£. c i t . , p . 174; L . N iz e r , og. c i t . , p . 15.

212f . L . W ellm an , S u ccess in C o u rt, op. c i t . , p . 208.

273

of the r e c o rd , p r e t r i a l d ep o s itio n s , and o th e r d o cum en ts w hich h e u s e s

fo r r e fe re n c e o r s im p ly p ro p s to in c r e a s e th e p e r s u a s iv e n e s s of h is

f in a l s p e e c h . 213 A ll co m m e n ta to rs on the su b je c t a g re e th a t th e re is

no su b s titu te fo r sp eech h ab its d es ig n ed to p ro v id e b a s ic a r t ic u la tio n ,

and o th e r te c h n ic a l a s p e c ts n eeded fo r u n d e rs tan d in g w hat is sa id . 214

F in a lly , no t on ly m u s t an a tto rn e y a rg u e in fa v o r of h is i n t e r p r e ­

ta tio n of the f a c ts of the c a s e , he m u s t a lso a c t a s an in te r p r e te r fo r the

in s tru c tio n s on law g iv en by the ju dge . The w ay in w hich the ju ry u n d e r ­

s tan d s the a p p lic a tio n of the law to the f a c t s - - th e re sp o n s ib ili ty of th e

ju d g e - -w ill s tro n g ly in flu en ce the d ire c tio n of the d ec is io n . A s the

in s tru c t io n s f ro m the judge follow the su m m atio n , i t i s a function of the

su m m atio n to ex p la in the ca se in such a w ay th a t i t w ill no t lo se g round

d u rin g the d is c u s s io n f ro m the ju dge . ^13

T hroughou t th e e n tire t r i a l , one ad m o n itio n i s m ade o v er and

o v e r a g a in - -p r e s e rv e th e r e c o rd fo r ap p ea l. T ha t i s , a t e v e ry p o in t

w h ere th e re i s a p o s s ib il i ty of e r r o r , an a t to rn e y m u s t be su re th a t he

ta k e s the s te p s r e q u ire d by ru le s to open a p a th to ap p ea l should the

d e c is io n go a g a in s t h im . A ll la w y e rs re a s o n th a t th e re w ill su re ly be

213l , N iz e r , c i t . , pp . 160-161.

214-yY S. S te w art, og, c i t . , p . 269; J . C. R eed , og. c i t . , p . 399.

2^^S. W e iss , og, c i t . , p . 187.

274

t im e s w hen the f in a l d e te rm in a tio n of a c a s e m ay w ait m o n th s o r y e a rs

u n til they can a rg u e an ap p ea l.

A pp ella te A dvocacy

T he v e ry e x is te n c e of c o u rts of a p p e a l i s an in d ica tio n of the

rh e to r ic a l n a tu re of the ju d ic ia l sy s tem . A p p ella te c o u r ts e x is t fo r the

p u rp o se of c o rre c tin g e r r o r s o c c u rr in g in th e o r ig in a l t r i a l c o u r t . Of

the p o ss ib le e r r o r s th e re a r e ^ a n y involv ing the q u es tio n of w h e th e r o r

n o t n o n -ra tio n a l p ro o fs w e re p e rm itte d to p lay an in flu en tia l ro le in the

d e c is io n of the low er c o u rt. Thus i t is a s su m e d th a t in th o se c a s e s

w h e re a le g a l d ec is io n h a s b een unduly d e te rm in e d by n o n - ra tio n a l

s tim u li, a c o u rt of ap p ea ls w ill d isco v e r i t and p ro v id e a c o r re c t io n .

T h e se a r e c le a r ly q u es tio n s involving th e a p p lic a tio n of r h e to r ic a l th eo ry .

H o w ev er, the ap p e lla te sy s te m is of in t e r e s t in i ts e lf b e c a u se of tile

r h e to r ic a l th e o r ie s invo lved in the p re s e n ta tio n of an ap p ea l by a n a tto rn e y .

In the c o u rt of a p p e a ls an a tto rn e y m ay com e to a rg u e th a t an

e r r o r w as co m m itted in the o r ig in a l c o u r t such th a t the d e c is io n m u s t be

s e t a s id e o r som e rem ed y p ro v id ed . T h is d isc u s s io n of e r r o r i s m o stly

l im ite d to the ap p lica tio n of the law bo th in the o p e ra tio n of the c o u r t

r u le s and in the com bining of law to the f a c ts found in the c a s e . T h a t is

to say , the fa c ts tend to be p re su m e d to s ta y the w ay the o r ig in a l c o u r t - -

275

judge o r j u r y - - h a s found th em , One of the re a so n s g iven fo r th is

g e n e ra l r e fu s a l by a p p e lla te c o u r ts to in te r f e r e w ith the fin d in g s of fa c t

i s the p re s u m e d value of the o r ig in a l ju ry o r judge hav ing b een p r e s e n t

to o b se rv e the w itn e ss when the te s tim o n y w as g iven . I t i s f e l t th a t

g r e a te r o p p o rtu n ity i s thus p ro v id e d fo r judging the c re d ib ili ty of the

w itn e s s ,

A f i r s t s tep in d isc u ss in g the rh e to r ic of ap p e lla te advocacy is

to u n d e rs ta n d the v a r io u s p ro c e d u re s of c o u r ts of ap p ea l. G en e ra lly

sp eak in g , the s te p s involved (once a c a se h a s b een a c c e p te d fo r rev iew )

a r e f i r s t , the su b m iss io n of a b r ie f ; second , the o ra l a rg u m en t; th ird , a

p r e l im in a ry co n fe re n c e of ju d g es; fo u rth , the w ritin g of a ten ta tiv e

d e c is io n by an a s s ig n e d m e m b e r of the co u rt; f if th , a co n fe ren ce am ong

ju d g es to m ak e th e f in a l d ec is io n ; and f in a lly , the w ritin g and p u b lica tio n

of the d e c is io n w ith d issen tin g o r c o n c u rrin g op in ions a s th ey o c c u r . How

th e se s te p s tak e p la c e and th e e m p h a s is g iven th em w ill in fluence the

u ltim a te d e c is io n and a r e a p a r t of the r h e to r ic a l co n tex t of the ap p ea l.

F o r ex a m p le , the re la tiv e e m p h a s is g iven the o r a l a rg u m e n t a s

opposed to the b r ie f i s v ita lly re le v a n t to the r h e to r ic a l c o n s id e ra tio n s

of a p p e lla te ad v o cacy . In the A ppella te D iv isio n of the N ew Y ork S uprem e

C o u rt F i r s t D e p a rtm e n t, fo r in s ta n c e , f ro m fifty to e igh ty p e r cen t of the

^ ^ ^ K a rl N , L lew elly n , The Com m on Law T ra d itio n (Boston;L i t t le , B row n and C om pany, I960), p . 28.

276

c a s e s p r e s e n te d a r e a rg u e d o ra l ly , and the re m a in d e r a r e su b m itted on

b r ie f s a lo n e . On the o th e r han d , in the U nited S ta te s S uprem e C o u rt,

o ra l a rg u m e n t is ex pected of each c a se and the c o u r t o rd in a r i ly in s is ts

217on o ra l a rg u m e n t even if the p a r t ie s a r e w illing to su b m it on b r ie f s .

To o b ta in a g e n e ra l u n d e rs tan d in g of ap p e lla te c o u r t p ro c e d u re ,

the p r a c t ic e s of som e re p re s e n ta t iv e c o u rts is g iven be low . P r io r to

h e a rin g a rg u m e n t in the A p p e lla te D iv ision of the New Y o rk S uprem e

C o u rt, the ju s t ic e s re a d the b r ie f s and thus r e le a s e the a tto rn e y s f ro m

the n e c e s s i ty of ex ten s iv e explcuiation of the n a tu re of the c a s e , ^18 In

the U nited S ta te s S uprem e C o u rt, the ju s t ic e s have som e know ledge of the

n a tu re of the c a se by having p a r t ic ip a te d in the d isc u s s io n o v e r the

p e titio n of c e r t i o r a r i , bu t w h e th e r o r no t the b r ie f s a r e re a d b e fo re

a rg u m e n t depends upon the p a r t ic u la r ju s t ic e , and the ex ten t of the w o rk

load fac ing the c o u r t. T h e re is re a s o n to b e liev e th a t i t i s no t com m on

fo r S uprem e C o u rt ju s t ic e s to r e a d b r ie f s re g u la r ly b e fo re a rg u m e n t, ^^9

Among the U nited S ta tes C o u rts of A p p ea ls , the p r a c t ic e v a r ie s f ro m

one c i r c u i t to a n o th e r . In som e c a s e s , b r ie f s a r e in v a r ia b ly re a d , in

o th e r c a s e s , they a r e re a d a t the d isc re tio n of the ju s t ic e s , and in s t i l l

21 7 D elm ar K a rlen , A p p e lla te C o u rts in the U nited S ta tes and E ngland (New Y ork; New Y o rk U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1963), p p , 19; 70,

p, 20,

2 1 9 p re d e r ic k B e rn a y s W ien e r, B rie fin g and A rgu ing F e d e ra l A ppeals (W ashington , D, C, : BNA Incorporated;) 1963), p , 16,

IÊ;':

277

o th e rs b r ie f s a r e r a r e ly re a d , In. the New Y o rk C o u rt of A p p ea ls ,

the p r im a r y m o tiv a tio n to r e a d b r ie f s f a l ls upon the judge to w hom the

c a se h a s b e e n a s s ig n e d fo r th e p re p a ra t io n of a sp e c ia l r e p o r t . He w ill

ten d to be w e ll p r e p a re d even to the e x te n t of having h is law c le rk s

p r e s e n t d u rin g a rg u m e n t. A s h is co lle a g u e s know he h a s b e e n a ss ig n ed

22.1th e c a s e , th ey m ay ten d to be m o re la x in p re p a ra tio n .

D u rin g o r a l a rg u m e n t, p ra c t ic e ten d s to be r e la t iv e ly s tan d a rd

am ong the v a r io u s c o u r ts . A ll c o u r ts p ro v id e a sp ec ified p e r io d of tim e

fo r each c o u n se l, and ten d to g u a rd i t c lo se ly . The a p p e lla n t m ay re s e rv e

a p o r tio n of h is tim e fo r re b u tta l follow ing the p re s e n ta t io n of the ap p e llee .

D uring the a rg u m e n t, the p ra c t ic e of ju d g es question ing co u n se l is

v ir tu a l ly u n iv e r s a l , w ith v a r ia t io n s com ing only in the f re q u e n c y of

q u e s tio n s and th e i r n a tu re .

F o llow ing o r a l a rg u m e n t, the p ra c t ic e s of c o u r ts ten d to v a ry .

The ch ie f c o n s id e ra tio n s h e r e co n ce rn the d ec is io n -m a k in g p ro c e d u re a

given c o u r t fo llo w s. F i r s t , i t i s u se fu l to know a t w hat s tag e of the p r o ­

c e s s the f i r s t vo te i s tak en am ong the ju d g e s . In som e c o u r ts , a f i r s t

vo te i s ta k e n im m e d ia te ly , and in o th e rs the c a se is s tu d ie d b e fo re the

v o te , "If tlie vo te i s tak en f i r s t , the opin ion is v e ry ap t to b eco m e , , ,

a b r ie f in su p p o rt of the m a jo r i ty v o te - -a n o th e r fa c to r th a t e m p h as izes

^^Ol b i d , , pp , 16-18 , ^^^D, K a r le n , op, c i t . , p , 36,

278

the im p o rtan ce of the im p re s s io n le f t a t the c lo se of the o r a l a rg u ­

m e n t, "222 T h u s, w hile the ju d ic ia l sy s te m a s su m e s a cap ac ity on the

p a r t of the judge to d e c la re an in it ia l p o s itio n and s ti l l m a in ta in a m ind

open to add itio n al a rg u m en ts w hich m ay ca u se h im to r e v e r s e h im se lf ,

the law y e rs have o b se rv e d a tendency am ong ju d g es to becom e ad v o ca te s

fo r th e ir p o s itio n once they have p u b lic ly id en tified th e m se lv e s w ith i t .

T h is i s an o th er in s ta n c e of ap p a re n t co n flic t betw een the rh e to r ic a l

th e o r ie s of the le g a l sy s te m and th o se of the p ra c tic in g p ro fe s s io n .

C le a r ly , the ra tio n a lity o r non - ra tio n a li ty of an ap p e lla te d e c is io n w ould

b e in fluenced by a d e s ir e to m a in ta in a c o n s is te n t v iew poin t, on the p a r t

of the ju d g es , b e tw een the im m ed ia te im p re s s io n gained f ro m o r a l a rg u ­

m e n t and the f in a l co n clu sio n e x p re s s e d a f te r co n fe ren ces with o th e r

ju d g es and includ ing study of the b r ie f s .

Second, w h e th e r one judge i s a s s ig n e d to w rite a d ra f t op in ion o r

if a l l judges w rite a m em o ran d u m on the c a s e w ill in fluence the rh e to r ic a l

co n tex t of the ap p ea l. In the U nited S ta te s S uprem e C o u rt, fo r ex am p le ,

c a s e s a r e h e a rd M onday th rough T h u rsd ay w hen the c o u rt i s in s e s s io n ,

an d on F r id a y a co n fe ren ce is h e ld . A t the c o n fe ren c e , the c a se is

s ta te d by the Chief J u s tic e and then i t i s d is c u s se d by each A sso c ia te

J u s t ic e in o rd e r of s e n io r ity . A fte r th i s , the c a se is vo ted on in an

2 2 2 f , B , W iener, 0£ , c i t , , pp , 19-20,

279

in v e rs e o rd e r of s e n io r ity , in the a tte m p t to keep se n io r ity f ro m in flu ­

encing the v o te . Once th e d ec is io n h a s b een m a d e , a ju s tic e is a s s ig n e d

to w rite an opinion by the s e n io r ju s t ic e in the m a jo r i ty . The d ra f t

opin ion is c irc u la te d am ong the ju s t ic e s , and f in a lly c o n s id e re d a t one

o r m o re c o n fe re n c e s . In p a r t ic u la r ly d iff icu lt c a s e s , th e re m ay be

p e rs o n a l d isc u ss io n am ong m e m b e rs of the m a jo r i ty and p o ss ib ly ten o r

m o re d ra f ts m ade of the op in ion , W iener m ak es the follow ing com m en t

on the r h e to r ic a l c o n s id e ra tio n s of th is p ro c e d u re .

F re q u e n tly , the c r i t ic a l fa c to r is th u s the leng th of tim e b e tw een a rg u m e n t an d co n fe ren c e . If a c a se a rg u e d on a W ednesday is v o ted on by F r id a y , n e c e s s a r i ly the im p re s s io n le f t by the o ra l a rg u m e n t w ill be tre m e n d o u s ly s ig n ifican t.To th e ex ten t th a t th e vo te is p o stp o n ed to the n ex t F r id a y o r to the co n fe ren ce fo llow ing th a t one, the b r ie f o r the ju s t ic e s ' independen t r e s e a r c h lo o m s l a r g e r in the f in a l d e te rm in a tio n ; the g r e a te r the t im e - la g , the m o re ind ep en d en t study b eco m es p o s s ib le ,

A m ong o th e r F e d e r a l c o u r ts , the p r a c t ic e s v a ry . In F i r s t C irc u it

of the U nited S ta tes C o u rt of A p p ea ls , th e re i s a co n fe ren ce h e ld a t the

end of e v e ry s ittin g and a p re l im in a ry vo te h e ld , a f te r w hich the a s s ig n ­

m e n t fo r opinion w ritin g i s m ad e . E ach judge does no t w rite a

m em o ra n d u m . In the Second C irc u it , e v e ry s ittin g judge w r i te s a

m em o ra n d u m fo r e v e ry c a s e h e a rd . In each m em o ran d u m the judge

in d ic a te s h is re a c tio n s to the le g a l p r in c ip le s invo lved and a ten ta tiv e

^ ^ ^ Ib id ., p , 21.

280

v o te . No c o n fe re n c e i s h e ld u n til a l l have p r e p a re d a m e m o ra n d u m and

re a d those of the o th e r ju d g e s . A t the co n fe ren c e d is c u s s io n m a y o ccu r

and te n ta tiv e v o te s m ay be re a f f irm e d o r r e v e r s e d , and a judge i s a s s ig n e d

to w rite the m a jo r i ty op in ion . In the F o u rth C irc u it , a co n fe re n c e i s h e ld

on the a f te rn o o n a f te r the a rg u m e n t. D isc u ss io n ta k e s p la ce on the

b r ie f s and o r a l a rg u m e n t. A fte r the c a se h a s b een th o ro u g h ly d is c u s s e d

(it m ay be c a r r ie d o v e r to a la te r co n feren ce) a vo te i s tak en and the

Chief Judge a s s ig n s a w r i te r of the opinion. T he p r a c t ic e s of the o th e r

F e d e ra l c o u r ts a r e v a r ia t io n s of th e se p a t te rn s ,

In th e A p p e lla te D iv isio n of the New Y o rk S uprem enG ourt, F i r s t

D e p a r tm e n t, the judge to w hom the c a se is sp e c if ic a lly a s s ig n e d m u s t

study the p a p e r s su b m itted and conduct o r s u p e rv is e such in d ep en d en t

r e s e a r c h a s he f e e ls n e c e s s a ry . He m u s t tak e in to acco u n t the v a lu e s

involved in the c a s e , and do v ir tu a l ly a il th a t w ould be invo lved in w ritin g

an opin ion , fo r u ltim a te ly he w ill reco m m en d to th e r e s t of th e c o u r t

how the c a s e should b e d isp o se d of. The o th e r ju d g es w ill in fo rm th e m ­

se lv e s on the c a se a s m u ch a s p o s s ib le c o n s id e rin g the tre m e n d o u s

dem ands on th e ir t im e . D uring the c o n fe re n c e , the judge to w hom the

c a se h a s b e e n a s s ig n e d r e p o r ts to the group and m a k e s h is re c o m m e n ­

d a tio n s , "H e sp eak s w ith no sp e c ia l au th o rity abou t th a t ap p ea l; no o th e r

2 2 4 ib id ,, pp. 21 -28 ,

281

ju s t ic e y ie ld s to h is ju d g m en t b e c a u se the ap p e a l w as a s s ig n e d to h im ;

and no undue r e s p e c t i s p a id to h is v iew s o r reco m m en d a tio n , The

c a se i s su b jec te d to g e n e ra l d isc u s s io n la s tin g fro m a few m in u te s to

h o u r s , o r c a r r ie d o v e r to a n o th e r co n fe re n c e . An opinion w r i te r is

a s s ig n e d once a m a jo r i ty i s d e te rm in e d .

The w r i te r of the opinion sends c o p ie s to a ll h is c o lle a g u e s and

they d is c u s s i t a t th e fo llow ing c o n fe re n c e . A gain a fu ll d is c u s s io n on

the c a se m ay r e s u l t . "S o m etim es a t th is p o in t, a p re v io u s ly d issen tin g

v iew m ay b e c o n v e r te d by d isc u s s io n in to the p re v a ilin g v iew , and an

op in ion p re p a re d a s a flam in g d is s e n t m ay b eco m e the opin ion of the

c o u rti'^ ^ ^

The p ro c e d u re in the N ew Y ork C o u rt of A ppeals is s im i la r to

th a t ju s t d is c u s s e d . T h e re is one ex cep tio n , h o w ev er, w o rth no ting .

D u rin g the c o n fe re n c e of ju d g e s , a tap e re c o rd in g is m ad e of the d e lib e ­

ra t io n s and i s a v a ila b le to the judge who u ltim a te ly w r i te s th e opin ion or

to a l l ju d g es in th e ev en t th e c a se i s c a r r i e d o v e r to a second o r th i rd

c o n fe ren c e ,

C om m enting on the above m en tio n ed p ra c t ic e of a s s ig n in g c e r ta in

ju d g e s p r im a ry r e s p o n s ib il i ty fo r a c a se p r io r to the o r a l a rg u m e n t,

A r th u r T . V a n d e rb ilt say s

K a r le n , og. c i t . , pp . 2 5 -2 6 . ^^^I b id . , p p . 26-27 .

p . 38.

282

T h e re a r e m any ap p e lla te c o u r ts in w hich the ap p ea ls a re a s s ig n e d fo r the w ritin g of d e c is io n s to the v a r io u s ju s t ic e s in ro ta tio n in advance of h e a r in g a rg u m e n t. H um an n a tu re be ing w hat i t i s , i t in e v itab ly fo llow s th a t the ju d g es who a r e n o t ch a rg e d w ith the w ritin g of an opinion in a p a r t ic u la r c a se a r e n o t lik e ly to tak e a s g re a t an in te r e s t in the c a se a s they w ould if they thought they m ig h t be c a lled on a t the c o u rt co n fe ren ce to w rite the opin ion . Ju d g es in one g re a t c o u r t have b een known to s lip ou t fo r a cup of te a w hen a ca se w as on in w hich th ey w ould no t b e p r im a r i ly re sp o n s ib le fo r the op in ion . T h is s y s te m , of c o u rse , is a l l w rong , b u t w here i t e x is ts , co u n se l w ill do w ell to u se a ll h is ingenu ity to a s c e r ­ta in who i s th e judge who h a s b een a s s ig n e d to w rite the opinion in h is c a s e .

T he obvious o b jec tio n to th is p ra c t ic e i s th a t i t ten d s to re s u l t in o n e -

m a n d e c is io n s , an d V a n d e rb ilt re c o g n iz e s th is by en co u rag in g la w y e rs

to c o n c e n tra te th e i r a tte n tio n upon the judge a s s ig n e d to th e ir c a s e .

The ad v o ca te , on ap p ea l, h a s two ch an n e ls of co m m u n ica tio n to

the co u rt: the b r ie f and th e o r a l a rg u m en t. E a ch h a s a function to p e r ­

fo rm . W hen m o s t e ffec tiv e ly u se d , one w ill co m p lem en t the o th e r . In

E n g lish ap p e lla te c o u r ts , the e m p h a s is i s p la c e d on o ra l a rg u m en t and

the b r ie f i s l im ite d to two o r th re e p a g e s in d ica tin g how the c a se cam e

up and the p o in ts to be a rg u e d . The o r a l a rg u m e n t l a s t s u n til the co u n se l

have f in ish ed o r the c o u r t re q u e s ts th em to stop . In the U nited S ta te s ,

on the o th e r hand , the b r ie f h a s a s su m e d co n s id e ra b ly m o re im p o rta n c e .

2 2 8A rthu r T . V a n d e rb ilt , " F o re n s ic P e r s u a s io n , " The Jo h n R a n ­dolph T u c k e r L e c tu re s , L e c tu re d e liv e re d b e fo re the School of L aw of W ashington and L ee U n iv e rs ity , 1949-1952, L ex in g to n , V irg in ia , 1952, pp . 51-52.

229ibid ., p. 49.

283

H e re , the b r ie f h a s becom e a w r itte n a rg u m e n t in su p p o rt o r in o p p o si­

tion to the o r d e r , d e c re e , o r ju d g m en t below , The va lue of the b r ie f

v a r ie s w ith the p ra c t ic e of the c o u r t. If b r ie f s a r e r e a d only a f te r o ra l

a rg u m e n t, and if the c o u rt h a s b een p e rsu a d e d to d ec id e the c a se one

w ay, the " , , , b r ie f b eco m es the peg on w hich i t can hang i t s co lle c tiv e

ju d ic ia l h a t, " If b r ie fs a r e r e a d in advance of a rg u m e n t, then the b r ie f

a c ts a s a f i r s t s tep in p e rsu a s io n . F in a lly , in a v e ry c lo se c a se w h ere

le g a l m a te r ia ls m u s t be s tu d ied c a re fu lly , ", . , the b r ie f b eco m es the

fa c to r on w hich the e n t ire c a se w ill be won o r lo s t , "^31 the b r ie f ,

the a tto rn e y p u ts the fa c ts of the c a se se le c te d f ro m the re c o rd of the

lo w er co u rtes p ro c e e d in g s , in d ic a te s th e body of la w --p re c e d e n t c a s e s

and o th e r a u th o r ity --w h ic h he fe e ls su p p o rt h is in te rp re ta t io n , and w o rk s

a l l of th em in to the i s s u e s r a is e d on the ap p ea l and an a rg u m en t in h is

fa v o r : T he b r ie f p ro v id e s an opportun ity fo r d e ta il and e la b o ra tio n no t

p o ss ib le on o r a l argument, ^32

The function of the o r a l a rg u m e n t i s to e m p h as iz e and c la r ify th e

w r itte n a rg u m e n t ap p ea rin g in the b r ie f , a cc o rd in g to the U nited S ta te s

S uprem e C o u rt, The o ra l a rg u m e n t should no t se e k to re v ie w the long

s e r ie s of d e c is io n s upon w hich the ap p ea l i s b a se d . R a th e r , i t should

230p^ B , W iener, 0£ , c i t , , p , 37, ^^^Ib id ,

232-^ iley R u tledge , "T he A p p ella te B r ie f , " The Jo u rn a l of the B a r A sso c ia tio n of the D is tr ic t of C olum bia , IX (A p ril, 1942), p , 150,

284

s e le c t one o r two m o s t convincing c a s e s and d is c u s s th em . R a th e r than

r e a d fro m the r e c o rd below o r f ro m th e d e c is io n s of p re v io u s c a s e s ,

the a tto rn e y d u rin g o ra l a rg u m en t should speak w ith th e c o u r t on the

q u es tio n of w h e th e r h is in te rp re ta t io n of the law is to be accep ted over

th a t of h is opponent. D iv e rg en t l in e s of p re c e d e n t shou ld b e d isc u sse d .

T he feeling a g a in s t the re ad in g of p r e p a re d sp eech es d u rin g o ra l a rg u ­

m en t is so g re a t th a t th e U nited S ta te s S uprem e C o u rt h a s w ritte n its

d isa p p ro v a l in to the c o u r t r u le s ,

P o s s ib ly b e c a u se of the re a c t io n a g a in s t pub lic speak ing d isc u s se d

in the p re v io u s c h a p te r , the d ire c tio n of sym pathy in th e U nited S ta tes

h a s b£en to fa v o r the b r ie f and d im in ish th e im p o rta n c e of o ra l a rg u m en t

o r to d isco n tin u e i t a l to g e th e r . T h is tre n d se e m s to b e a p a r t of a g e n e ­

r a l m ov em en t aw ay fro m e m p h a s is upon t r i a l o r ad v o cacy w ork in g e n e ra l.

F o r som e tim e w r i te r s and s p e a k e rs have been c o n ce rn ed w ith th is

developm en t. One in d iv id u al c a lle d a tte n tio n to a q u e s tio n n a ire sen t to

ten law sch o o ls in th e w e s te rn p a r t of the U nited S ta te s , The r e s u l ts

show ed th a t only sev en p e r cen t of th e s tu d en ts p lan n ed to en te r any fo rm

of t r i a l w o rk . T h e ir re a so n s w e re th a t i t re q u ire d too m uch w ork , w as

n o t a s lu c ra t iv e , and th a t t r i a l w o rk i s on i t s way ou t, A nother

^^^R alph M , C a rso n , "C onduct of th e A p p e a l- -A L a w y e r 's V iew , " A ppeals (P h ilad e lp h ia : A m e ric a n L aw In s titu te , O c to b e r , 1954), p , 87, T h is book is one in a s e r ie s on th e p re p a ra t io n and t r i a l of a c iv il a c tio n p u b lish ed by the A m e ric a n L aw In s titu te , I t in c lu d es tl ire e a r t ic le s ,

A , G ooch, "S hall A dvocacy V a n ish ? " W ashington Law R eview and S ta te B a r J o u rn a l, V ol, 31(W inter, 1956), pp . 358-367,

285

c o m m e n ta to r n o ted , " It a p p e a rs to m e th a t a sad d ec lin e in the a r t [ of

a d v o c a c y j h a s b een tak ing p la c e fo r som e tim e . "^35 Qf the th re e m a jo r

fa c tio n s in th e le g a l p ro fe s s io n —le g a l s c h o la rs , o ffice la w y e rs who

a d v ise c l ie n ts a s to the law , and a d v o c a te s - - th is a u th o r say s of advocacy,

I g re a t ly f e a r th a t th is b ra n c h of the p ro fe s s io n , in c o n tr a s t to th e o th e r two b ra n c h e s , i s m a rk e d ly on the d e c lin e . T h is i s n o t a lo n e m y own o b se rv a tio n . I t i s c o n firm ed b y the o b s e rv a tio n of ju d g es and la w y e rs of w ide e x p e rie n c e and sound ju d g m en t, who a r e deep ly c o n c e rn e d about th e p ro b le m .

A s a r e s u l t of th is a lleg ed d ec lin e in ad v o cacy , i t is o b s e rv e d th a t th e re

h a s b een a d ec lin e in the ap p lica tio n of the tech n iq u es of the a r t of

advocacy : l e s s e ffec tiv e p re s e n ta t io n of c a s e s . A n o th e r o b se rv a tio n

su g g e s ts a s te a d y d ec lin e in the e m p h a s is on advocacy in the fa c e of

in c re a s in g n e ed . A lm o st a l l the w r i te r s in d ica te sh o ck a t th e r e p o r t

f ro m the H a rv a rd Law School of a s tu d en t q u e s tio n n a ire w hich a sk e d the

s tu d en ts to l i s t in ran k o rd e r the s k il ls of a la w y e r . T he lo w e s t sk ill

r a n k e d --b y a w ide m a rg in - -w a s ad v o cacy .

In re sp o n se to th is a p p a re n t t r e n d aw ay f ro m ad v o cacy , the m e m ­

b e r s of the p ro fe s s io n have p ro d u ced an im p re s s iv e n u m b e r of

2 3 5 p r e d e r ic k V an P e l t B r y a n , "The R ise and F a l l o f th e A r t of A d v o c a c y , " C hitty*s L aw J o u r n a l, V o l. 7 (1957), p . 13.

^^^ Ib id .

^ ^ ^ H e n ri M« A ld rid g e , "A dvocacy—A D eclin ing A r t? " The A la ­b a m a L a w y e r , V ol. 20 (O cto b er, 1959), pp . 388-395,

^^®Lon L , F u l le r , "W ork on the C u rr ic u lu m , " H a rv a rd L aw School B u lle tin , N o, 2 (Ju ly , 1948), pp . 1 -10 ,

286

a rg u m e n ts in fa v o r of the o r a l a rg u m e n t o v e r the w r itte n b r ie f . The

fo llow ing a r e re p re s e n ta t iv e , R o b e r t H, J ac k so n , then A sso c ia te J u s tic e

of the U nited S ta te s S uprem e C o u rt, sa id in 1951:

L a w y e rs so m etim es q u e s tio n the value of th e re la t iv e ly s h o r t o r a l a rg u m e n t p e rm it te d in the N ation*s h ig h e s t c o u r t.T hey a s k w h e th e r i t is no t a v e s tig ia l fo rm a lity w ith l i t t le e ffe c t on th e r e s u l t . In e a r l i e r t im e s , w ith few c a s e s on i t s d o ck e t, the C ourt could and d id h e a r a rg u m e n ts th a t la s te d fo r d a y s , , , , O ver the y e a r s the tim e a llo tte d fo r h e a r in g h a s b e en sh o rte n e d , b u t i t s im p o rta n c e h a s n o t d im in ish ed .T he s ig n ifican ce of the tre n d is th a t the s h o r te r the t im e , the m o re p re c io u s i s each m in u te ,

I th ink the J u s tic e s w ould a n sw e r unan im ously th a t now , a s tra d it io n a lly , they re ly h ea v ily on o ra l p re s e n ta t io n s . M ost of them fo rm a t le a s t a te n ta tiv e conclusion f ro m i t in a la rg e p e rc e n ta g e of the c a s e s , , , , The b a r m u s t m ake i t s p r e p a ­ra tio n s fo r o ra l a rg u m en t on th e p r in c ip le th a t i t a lw ay s is of the h ig h e s t , and often of c o n tro llin g , im p o rta n c e ,

Spealcing a s a judge of the a p p e lla te c o u rt in In d ian a , C h a r le s F , R em y

sa y s , " P e rs o n a lly , I think e v e ry c a se of any im p o rta n c e should be

a rg u ed o ra lly , " He o b se rv e s th a t in h is co u r t, the r e c o rd goes only to

the judge who h a s b een a ss ig n e d th e p a r t ic u la r c a s e . T h u s , i t i s only

th ro u g h o ra l a rg u m e n t th a t the rem a in in g ju d g es o b ta in the m a jo r

im p re s s io n of th e c a s e , "If I w e re to go b ack in the p r a c t ic e , " R em y

co n c lu d es , "I w ould a rg u e o ra lly e v e ry c a se on a p p ea l in w hich I w as

in te re s te d , "240 ^ r e p re s e n ta tiv e of the Iowa S uprem e C o u rt s ta te s ,

2 3 9 R o b ert H , Jack so n , "A dvocacy b e fo re th e S u p rem e C ourt: Sug­g e s tio n s fo r E ffe c tiv e C ase P re s e n ta t io n s , " A m e rica n B a r A sso c ia tio n J o u rn a l, V ol, 37 (N ovem ber, 1951), p , 801,

2 4 0 ch a .rle s F , R em y, " B r ie f and O ra l A rg u m en t on A ppeal, " Ind iana L aw J o u rn a l , Vol. VI, P ro c e e d in g s of the 34th A nnual M eeting , Ind iana S ta te B a r A sso c ia tio n , B loom ington , I n d ., Ju ly 10-11 , 193(^pp, 16* 28,

287

I t i s o ften a sk e d w h e th e r the c o u rt r e a l ly d e s ir e s o r a l a rg u m e n ts , and , a s a c o ro lla ry in q u iry , w h e th e r they do any good w hen p re s e n te d . Both q u e r ie s m u s t be a n sw ered s tro n g ly in the a f f irm a tiv e . N ot only a r e o ra l a rg u m e n ts g e n e ra lly en jo y ed b y the c o u r t, b u t, m uch m o re im p o rta n t, w hen w e ll h an d led th ey a r e m o s t he lp fu l to i t . Of c o u rse , the w r itte n r e c o r d s , b r ie f s , and a rg u m e n ts a r e of p r im a r y v a lu e , b u t f i r s t im p re s s io n s a r e a lw ays im p o r ta n t, and th e se a r e g a in ed f ro m the a p p e a ra n c e s of the a tto rn e y s b e fo re the c o u r t and w hat th ey say th e re .

The fo llow ing e n th u s ia s tic com m ent w as m ad e by an A sso c ia te J u s t ic e of

the O reg o n S uprem e C o u rt,

One of the m o m en ts w hich m a k e s u s p ro u d of our m e m b e r ­sh ip in the le g a l p ro fe s s io n o c c u rs w hen we see an a tto rn e y r i s e in an a p p e lla te c o u r t, w alk to the le c te r n and then a d d re s s th e c o u r t co n cern in g h is c a se in a m a n n e r w hich ho ld s the r a p t a tte n tio n of a ll . . . . The m e m b e rs of the B ench b eco m e so a b s o rb e d in the a tto rney*s d isc o u rse th a t he con tinues u n in te r ­ru p te d by any q u es tio n . P la in ly , he i s c re a tin g fo r h is c a s e a fa v o ra b le im p re s s io n th a t is tak ing deep ro o t. B efo re h is a l lo tte d tim e h a s e la p se d he re su m e s h is s e a t even though a l l w ould have b ee n w illin g fo r h im to h av e con tinued . When we o b se rv e such an exam ple of advocacy , a l l doubts co n cern in g the v a lu e of o r a l a rg u m e n t v an ish .

L e s s p o e tic an d m o re p ra c t ic a l i s F r e d e r ic k B . W ien er, an a tto rn e y in

W ashington , D , C. and fo rm e r A s s is ta n t to th e S o lic ito r G e n e ra l of the

U nited S ta te s , "T he b ru ta l , h a rd fa c t i s , " sa y s W iener, " th a t som e

c a s e s a r e won and lo s t on o ra l a rg u m e n t, "^43 E la b o ra tin g upon th is

s ta te m e n t, W iener s a y s ,

241q , K . T hom pson , "O ra l A rg u m en ts in the S uprem e C o u rt of Iow a, " Iow a L aw R eview , V ol, 38 (Spring , 1953), p , 394,

242Q eorge R o ssm a n , "A ppella te C o u rt A dvocacy: T he Im p o rtan ce of O ra l A rg u m e n t, " A m ericcui B a r A sso c ia tio n J o u rn a l, V ol, 45 (Ju ly , 1959), p . 675,

2 4 3 p red er ick B . W ien er, "O ra l A dvocacy, " H a rv a rd L aw R eview V ol, 62 (N ovem ber, 1948), p . 58,

288

T h e re a r e , of c o u rs e , som e c a s e s w hich a p a r ty can n o t lo s e , and o th e r c a s e s w hich he canno t w in , r e g a rd le s s of the sk ill o r le a rn in g o r p e r s u a s iv e p o w e rs of h is ad v o ca te . B u t in the la rg e in te rm e d ia te zo n e , co m posing p e rh a p s f if ty p e r cen t of the to ta l , w h ere no one w ould suppose *that c iv iliz a tio n w ill com e to an end w h ich ev e r w ay th is c a se i s d ec id ed , * and w h ere the c a s e s do n o t p r e s e n t p r e s s in g p ro b le m s o r b u rn in g is s u e s , o ra l a rg u m e n t p la y s a v e ry su b s ta n tia l if no t a d e c is iv e p a r t in d e te rm in in g the o u tco m e , , , , I t i s c e r ta in th a t , to an am az in g d e g re e , ju d g e s ' im p re s s io n s a t the c lo se of th e o ra l a rg u m e n ts co inc ide w ith th e i r f in a l d e te rm in a tio n s ,

W riting o v e r a d ecade l a t e r , W ien er in d ic a te d th a t he h ad c o n firm e d h is

b e lie f in the h igh c o r re la t io n b e tw een d e c is io n s of ju d g e s im m e d ia te ly

follow ing o r a l a rg u m e n t an d the f in a l d e c is io n in the c a s e , W iener

e m p h a s iz e s th a t th is co n c lu s io n should n o t im p ly a c a u s a l r e la t io n w ith

the o ra l a rg u m e n t. On th e c o n tr a ry , such a c o r re la t io n o c c u rs in sp ite

of the m an y in e ffec tiv e a rg u m e n ts . T h e re i s a lso no w ay to d e te rm in e

w h eth er o r n o t the d e c is io n w ould have b ee n d iffe re n t had th e re b een no

o ra l a rg u m e n t. N e v e r th e le s s , in one study inc lud ing d a ta f ro m th i r ty -

e ig h t S ta te and T e r r i to r i a l c o u r ts of l a s t r e s o r t a s w e ll a s th a t f ro m

F e d e ra l ap p e lla te c o u r ts , the " , , , p e rc e n ta g e of co in c id en ce w as v e ry

high; the l a r g e s t group of ju d g es w ro te th a t th e ir f in a l vo te co inc ided

w ith th e ir im p re s s io n a t th e c lo se of the a rg u m e n t in 90 p e r cen t o r m o re

of a l l c a s e s h e a rd , " In a n o th e r , m o re re c e n t study , the p e r cen t ran g ed

fro m fifty to e igh ty p e r c e n t of th e c a s e s com ing b e fo re F e d e r a l a p p e lla te

244ibid,

289

c o u r ts . In th is s tudy on ly one judge r e p o r te d a p e rc e n ta g e of n in e ty o r

h ig h e r , In conclud ing h is co m m en ts on the re la tiv e m e r i t s of b r ie fs

and o ra l a rg u m e n ts , W ien er sa y s , "A ll I can f a ir ly o r p ro p e r ly a s s e r t

i s th a t s u c c e ss on a p p e a l i s f a r m o re lik e ly to follow fro m e ffe c tiv e than

in e ffec tiv e b r ie f s and a rg u m e n ts , , , . W hile th is m ay s e e m to be

q u ite a r e s e rv e d s ta te m e n t, i t r e f le c ts a rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in c o n flic t

w ith th a t h e ld by m any in the p ro fe s s io n v/ho b e liev e th a t the t r a in e d

judge in the c o u r t of a p p e a l w ill, th ro u g h h is own study of the c a s e a s

w e ll a s h is re c e p tio n of c o u n s e ls ’ a rg u m e n ts , u ltim a te ly d is c o v e r the

p ro p e r ru le s of law . In such a b e lie f , th e e ffec tiv e n e ss o r la c k of i t in

a rg u m e n ts should only fa c i l i ta te o r im p ed e th is se a rc h ; i t i s n o t ex p ec ted

to m ak e a s ig n if ic an t d iffe re n c e .

P ro m in e n t a tte n tio n is g iven by p r a c t i t io n e r s to th e r h e to r ic a l

e ffe c tiv e n e ss of the s t r u c tu re of b r ie f an d o r a l a rg u m e n t. T h e re i s

s tro n g a g te e m e n t th a t th e a r ra n g e m e n t o f p o in ts in e i th e r w ill in c r e a s e

o r d e c re a s e th e p ro b a b ility of a fa v o ra b le ju d g m en t.

The a r ra n g e m e n t of the b r ie f i s e s s e n tia l ly s ta n d a rd iz e d in to the

follow ing m a jo r d iv is io n s : (I) re su m e of the op in ions of lo w er c o u r ts ;

(2) q u es tio n s p re s e n te d in the appeal; (3) s ta te m e n t of fa c ts ; (4) su m m ary

3 W ien e r , B rie f in g and A rg u in g F e d e ra l A p p e a ls , op , c it.pp , 31-32 ,

2 4 6 ib id ,, p , 33,

290

of a rg u m en t; (5) a rg u m en t; and (6) a v e ry b r ie f conclusion . W ithin th ese

d iv is io n s , h o w ev er, the a tto rn e y h as d is c re tio n . In the s ta te m e n t of

f a c ts , fo r ex am p le , the co u n se l m u s t te l l a s to ry w hich is c o n s is te n t

w ith the re c o rd b u t w hich c r e a te s a fa v o ra b le im p re s s io n fo r h is po sitio n .

"T he id ea l end to be sought in y o u r s ta te m e n t of the fa c ts i s th a t the

s ta te m en t when co m p le te should p o in t n a tu ra lly to y ou r co n c lu sio n .

The s ta te m e n t m u s t be c le a r and in fo rm a tiv e . "The b a s ic p sy ch o lo g ica l

fa c t th a t know ledge is cum u la tiv e can be u se d to advantage by w orking

f ro m the e s s e n t ia l fa c ts to w ard the d e ta i ls . "248 Many a tto rn e y s a ttem p t

to re la te the te s tim o n y in the sam e o rd e r a s i t w as p re s e n te d by the

w itn e sse s . T h is w as the only w ay i t cou ld b e p re se n te d in the o r ig in a l

c o u r t, b u t the ap p e lla te a tto rn e y can r e - a r r a n g e the fa c ts so th a t they

fo rm a un ified w e ll-o rd e re d s to ry . T h u s , the sam e w itn e ss m ay have

o rig in a lly re la te d fa c ts re le v a n t to two p o in ts in the ap p ea l. T h e re is no

re a so n to r e - s t a t e a ll th e se fa c ts a t o n ce , b u t r a th e r he should a r ra n g e

a ll the fa c ts re le v a n t to po in t A to g e th e r , and th o se re le v a n t to p o in t B

to g e th e r . T h e re see m s to b e s tro n g a g re e m e n t am ong w r i te r s th a t

the s tro n g e s t p o in t should be p u t f i r s t .

M. C a rso n , 0£ . c i t . , p . 78.

248f . B . W ien er, "O ra l A d v o cacy ," op. c i t . , p . 68.

249ibid.

291

F i r s t im p re s s io n s a re la s tin g . T he hum an m ind d oes no t lik e to ho ld ju d g m en t in su sp en se . We b eg in to lean in one d ire c tio n o r the o th e r a lm o s t a t once, and h av ing begun to develop a ju d ic ia l hunch in fav o r of one s id e , we do not e a s ily r e v e r s e o u r s e lv e s . Ju d g es fro m e x p e r ie n c e if no t by te m p e ra m e n t a r e lik e ly to be m o re open -m inded th an m o s t of u s , b u t th ey too a r e hu m an . If on read ing your f i r s t p o in t the judge h a s the im p re s s io n th a t y o u r ca se is w eak , the ch an ces th a t your l a t e r p o in ts w ill change h is m in d a r e n o t good, ^50

Such a co n c lu sio n is c o n s is te n t w ith th e o r ie s in psycho logy w hich

d e s c r ib e a p ro c e s s of te n s io n -re d u c tio n o c c u rr in g in d e c is io n -m a k in g .

The th e o ry a s s u m e s th a t ind iv iduals e x p e r ie n c e te n s io n f ro m the lack

of d e c is io n an d have a strong ten d en cy to red u ce the te n s io n by seeking

d e c is io n . T h u s , th is th eo ry d e s c r ib e s a p ro c e s s a t c ro s s -p u rp o s e to

the r a tio n a l th e o ry w hich a s su m e s th e w ithholding of d e c is io n to the l a s t

p o s s ib le m o m en t, w hen a s m uch d a ta a s p o ss ib le h a s b een g a th e re d . If

the n o n - ra tio n a l th e o ry i s h e ld , then i t fo llow s th a t an a tto rn e y , when

w ritin g b r ie f , should n o t only p u t h is s tro n g p o in ts f i r s t , he should

avoid a m u ltip lic ity o f a rg u m en ts w eak and s tro n g to c o n c e n tra te on h is

2 c 1few s tro n g e s t p o in ts and hope to c a p tu re an im m ed ia te d ec is io n .

The a r ra n g e m e n t of the o r a l a rg u m e n t is a lso the su b jec t of

d isc u s s io n am ong ju d g es and p r a c t i t io n e r s . In the f i r s t p la c e , i t is the

p r a c t ic e of som e to d iv ide the o ra l a rg u m e n t am ong two o r m o re a tto rn e y s .

2 5 0 jjen ry W eihofen, L eg a l W ritin g S tyle (St. P a u l , M inneso ta:W est P u b lish in g C o ,, 1961), p . 192,

251jEdward S. D ore , " E x p re s s in g the Idea: The E s s e n tia ls of O ra l and W ritte n A rg u m en t, " F o rd h am L aw R eview , XXIII (D ec. 1954), p ,231 .

292

T h is p ra c t ic e is g e n e ra lly d isc o u ra g e d . F u r th e r , the co u n se l i s

a d v ise d to pay c o n s id e ra b le a tte n tio n to the opening sen te n ce o r tw o,

"H igh on the l i s t of e s s e n tia ls i s the u se of a good opening sen ten ce o r

p a ra g ra p h to ca tch the cou rtes a tte n tio n and e ffec tiv e ly to lodge the m a jo r

p o in ts of the c a se in the c o u r t 's m in d in the c r i t i c a l f i r s t two m in u te s

of a rg u m en t. "253 A lso , i t i s im p o rta n t th a t the a tto rn e y im m e d ia te ly

r e la te the c o u rt to the c o n tro v e rsy . The co u n se l should say w hich p a r ty

he r e p re s e n ts and the n a tu re of th e c a se and the p o s itio n in w hich the

c a s e com es up on ap p ea l.

F ollow ing the s ta te m e n t of fa c ts co m es the a rg u m e n t. In o ra l

a rg u m e n t i t i s w ise to follow the law p o in ts of th e b r ie f only to the ex ten t

th a t m ax im u m u se i f m ade of the unique ad v an tag es of the o r a l p r e s e n ­

ta tio n . Some p o in ts can be m o s t e ffec tiv e ly developed o ra l ly , while

o th e rs a r e b e s t le f t to a r e fe re n c e to the b r ie f . S o m etim es i t is w ise to

c o n s id e r the type of p e rso n n e l on th e c o u r t in d e te rm in in g the o rg a n iz a tio n

of o r a l a rg u m en t. Som e c o u r ts a r e m uch m o re in c lin ed to a s k q u es tio n s

th an o th e rs ; som e c o u r ts m ay be m o re in c lin ed to fa v o r one p o s itio n

th an o th e rs .

Should the tr ib u n a l w ith w hich you have to d ea l fa l l m a rk ed ly in to any one of th e se c a te g o r ie s , y o u r d ev e lo p m en t in o r a l

252r , M. C a rso n , op. c i t . , p . 78.2 C 9

F . B , W ien e r, "O ra l A dvocacy , " op. c i t . , p . 61.

2 5 4 r , M. C arbon , 0£ . c i t . , p . 78.

293

a rg u m e n t of the law p o in ts m ay w e ll he a ffec te d . A c o u rt in c lin e d to a sk q u e s tio n s i s one to w hich you w ould p r e s e n t y o u r le g a l c o n ten tio n s in som ew hat su m m ary fo rm , w hile o rg a n iz in g in d ep th the p r in c ip le s of d e c is io n invo lved and the n a m e s of lead in g c a s e s so th a t you m ay re sp o n d a p p ro p ria te ly to th e ex p ec ted q u e s tio n s . F o r the s o -c a lle d u n in q u is itiv e c o u r t , on the o th e r h and , you w ould develop y o u r in itia l p re s e n ta t io n w ith m o re fu lln e s s in re l ia n c e upon i t s being y o u r p r in c ip à l o r a l s ta te m e n t co n cern in g the law , in th a t you w ill n o t have m an y q u es tio n s to m e e t.

S im ila r ly , w ith a c o u r t w hich you b e lie v e to b e sy m p a th e tic to y o u r side of th e c a se o r to y o u r m a jo r p ro p o s itio n s , you w ill develop a m o re ejq )ansive fo rm of s ta te m e n t of y o u r le g a l p ro p o s i t io n s , w h ich m ay re c e n tly have b een e n d o rse d in th a t c o u r t and w hich you m ay th e re fo re ex p ec t to c a r r y you to v ic to ry upon y o u r s ta te m e n t of fa c ts ; w h e re a s w ith the so - c a lle d u n re c e p tiv e c o u r t you m u s t ex p e c t to ad v an ce y o u r p ro p o s itio n s of law b y s tag e s and b e p r e p a re d fo r cha llenge and a d v e rse c o m m e n t. Such a re c e p tio n , if y o u r le g a l a rg u ­m e n t i s sound and w e ll m a rs h a lle d , should g ive you only a b e t te r e n try in to th e ju d ic ia l m in d . T h a t ad v o ca te i s a s tu te who w e lco m es an d w ill s tr iv e to m e e t on an e q u a l b a s is the ch a llen g e and q u e s tio n of a c o u r t dem anding to b e convinced .

T he o r a l a rg u m e n t i s n o t c o n s id e re d a good p lace to rev iew in d e ta il a

long s e r ie s of d e c is io n s w ith ex ten d ed d isc u s s io n s of the fa c ts invo lved .

I t i s f a r b e t te r to s e le c t only " . . . a c a rd in a l p o in t a ro u n d w hich l e s s e r

p o in ts rev o lv e lik e p la n e ts a ro u n d the sun. . . . " "T he te m p ta tio n i s

a lw ay s p r e s e n t to ‘l e t no g u ilty p o in t escape* in th e hope th a t if one hook

b r e a k s an o th e r m ay h o ld . " Such a p ro c e d u re m ay b e in o rd e r fo r th e

b r ie f w h e re the judge m ay re a d a s l i t t le o r a s m uch a s he d e s i r e s , b u t

th is w eak en s an o r a l a rg u m e n t.

ZSSib id . , p p . 8 2 -8 3 .

c i t . , p . 104,2 5 6 jo h n W. D a v is , "The A rg u m en t of an A p p ea l, " A p p ea ls , op.

294

A p p ella te advocacy p ro v id e s a unique chance fo r aud ience an a ly ­

s is . A c o u rt of a p p e a ls re f le c ts the a ttitu d es of the sam e m en o v e r and

o v e r , and the a tt i tu d e s a r e a m a t te r of public re c o rd . W ithin the o ra l

a rg u m en t the c o u r t ten d s to a sk q u es tio n s w hich re v e a l sp ec ific a ttitu d es

and in te re s ts abou t the c a se a t hand . "The la w y e r, of a l l w r i te r s , h as

the e a s ie s t ta s k w hen i t co m es to iden tify ing h is r e a d e r s . The th re e

o r n ine m en to w hom h is b r ie f and a rg u m e n t a r e d ire c te d a r e freq u en tly

p e rso n a lly known to the a tto rn e y . H e should have som e id e a of w hat w ill

ap p ea l to th em an d w hat w ill n o t. "He m ay know so m eth in g of th e ir

s e v e ra l ta s te s an d in te r e s t s : th e i r p o lit ic a l, so c ia l and econom ic po in ts

of v iew , th e ir h o b b ies and the ju d ic ia l and o th e r pu b lic f ig u re s whom

they a d m ire . . . . "258 one w r i te r pu t it,

F in a lly , and m o s t im p o rta n t of a l l , re m e m b e r th a t you a r e not ju s t a rg u in g to a body; you a r e s tr iv in g to p e rsu a d e a m a jo r ity of sev en ind iv idual h u m an b e in g s , o r a d iv is io n of th re e , to r e v e r s e o r a f f irm . To study and know the in a r tic u la te m a jo r p r e m is e of each . . . i s n o t uneth ical; th is i s p la in com m on s e n se . P u t y o u rse lf in the p lace of each ju d g e , though w ith h is p e rs o n a li ty and n o t y o u rs ; and then dec ide w hat would m ove you. E a c h ap p e lla te ju d g e , unlike the ran d o m ju ry m a n , can b e d is s e c te d by r e s o r t to h is opinions o v e r the y e a r s , a s w ell a s f ro m o th e r le g itim a te s o u r c e s . 2^9

^^^H . W eihofen, o£. c i t . , p . 5. ^^^Ib id .

259G eorge John M ille r , "In tro d u c tio n to O ra l A rg u m en t of an A ppeal, " F lo r id a L aw Jo u rn a l , XXV (June, 1951), p . 222.

295

T h u s , w ith r e g a rd to au d ien ce a n a ly s is , " i t i s nothing le s s th an fo o lish

fo r a law y er to fa il to keep c le a r ly b e fo re h im the m en ta l p ic tu re of the

mzin whom he is a d d re s s in g , . . .

F in a lly , w ith r e g a rd to o r a l ad v o cacy , i t i s obvious th a t b a s ic

s k il ls of good sp eech should be em ployed . T h a t i s , the e f fe c tiv e n e ss of

the co u n se l w ill be in c re a s e d to the ex te n t he p re s e n ts h im se lf w e ll

b e fo re the c o u r t, sp eak s so th a t a l l m ay h e a r w hile avoid ing th e so m e ­

t im e s e x c e ss iv e d e liv e ry m o re su itab le to a ju ry . The sp e a k e r should

u se language f ittin g fo r the o c ca s io n w hile avoid ing the v e ry com m on

fa u lt of o v e r -u s e of te c h n ic a l ja rg o n . T he sp e a k e r should d r e s s and

b eh av e acco rd in g to the ex p ec ted ro le of a co u n se l p re se n tin g a c a se

b e fo re a d ign ified tr ib u n a l. Above a l l , the a tto rn e y m u s t n o t r e a d to the

c o u r t . W r ite r s on ap p e lla te advocacy have m ade th is adm o n itio n m o re

fre q u e n tly than any o th e r ty p e . F ro m the freq u en cy and v eh em en ce

w ith w hich such co m m en ts a r e m a d e , i t can only be concluded th a t m any

la w y e rs a tte m p t to o v erco m e th e ir in ad e q u a c ie s in pub lic speak ing by

rea d in g p re p a re d sp ee c h e s o r even w o rse , re a d in g d ire c tly f ro m the

r e c o rd of the lo w er p ro c e e d in g s . I t h a s a lre a d y b een no ted th a t the U. S.

Suprem e C o u rt h a s w r itte n in to i t s ru le s a b an on read in g n o te s to the

W eihofen, og. c i t . , p . 5.

296

c o u r t in i t s r u le s . T h e re can be no doubt th a t a sk ille d sp e a k e r w ill

re c e iv e a m o re fa v o ra b le h e a r in g in any a p p e lla te c o u r t,

T h is c h a p te r h a s b een dev o ted to a r e la tiv e ly d e ta ile d ex am in a tio n

of the rh e to r ic of le g a l p ra c t ic e a s p r e s e n te d by th o se engaged in th e day

to day w o rk of a la w y e r . I t can be s a id in te n ta tiv e co n clu sio n th a t the

rh e to r ic a l th e o r ie s of p r a c t i t io n e r s ten d to le a n m o re in the d ire c tio n of

m o d e rn p e rs u a s io n th e o ry than do th o se of le g a l s c h o la r s . T h a t i s to

say , the a tto rn e y who m e e ts c lie n ts in h is office an d a d v e r s a r ie s in the

c o u rt o r a d m in is tra t iv e agency m u s t b eg in w ith the fra m e w o rk of ra t io n a l

d e c is io n -m ak in g and seek to d isc o v e r w ays in w hich he can b e s t advance

h is cau se v/ithout open ly v io la tin g th e g iven r u le s . In h is s e a rc h , the

p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y h a s d isc o v e re d th a t p e r s u a s io n m ay tra n sc e n d the

a s su m e d ra tio n a l l im i ts . He h a s d is c o v e re d w e a k n e sse s in the p r e s c r ib e d

p ro c e s s w hich m u s t b e o v erco m e by p ro o fs o th e r than fa c ts and lo g ic .

Above a l l , he h a s d isc o v e re d th a t ju s t ic e m ay depend m o re upon the

e ffe c tiv e n e ss w ith w hich a g iven co u n se l u s e s the av a ilab le m e a n s of

p e rs u a s io n than upon any s in g le r a t io n a l fa c to r invo lved ,

261°^M any w r i te r s d isc u s s the p u b lic speak ing a s p e c t of ap p e lla te advocacy . The fo llow ing a r e s im p ly r e p re s e n ta t iv e , W illiam C, M cD onald, "O ra l A rg u m en t, " T e x a s B a r J o u rn a l , XVI (A pril 22 , 1954), p p , 209-210; P a x to n B la i r , "A ppella te B r ie f s and A d v o c a cy ," F o rd h am L aw R eview , XVIII (M arch , 1949), p p , 30-48; G eorge I , H a ig h t, "T he A dvocate in C o u rts of R eview , " W isco n sin Law R ev iew , V ol, 1940 (M ay, 1940), pp , 327-334,

297

T h e se o b s e rv a tio n s g ive r i s e to the q u e s tio n of th e v a lid ity of the

u n d e rly in g rh e to r ic a l th e o r ie s of the leg a l p r o c e s s . T h is q u estio n w ill

b e p u rsu e d in the follow ing c h a p te r .

C H A PTER V

APPROA CHES TO THE VALIDATION

OF LEG A L RHETORIC

D ata thus fa r p r e s e n te d m o s t s tro n g ly su g g e s t the e x is ten c e of an

u n d erly in g rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in the leg a l p r o c e s s . B oth le g a l s c h o la rs

and p r a c t i t io n e r s reco g n ize th e e s se n tia l ly rh e to r ic a l c h a ra c te r of

ad ju d ica tio n .

T he in fo rm a tio n in the p re ce d in g c h a p te rs a lso p ro v id e s a c le a r

p ic tu re of the c h a ra c te r of th e rh e to r ic a l th e o ry of law . I t seem s a s if

the th e o ry h a s changed l i t t le f ro m th a t once s ta te d b y A r is to t le , I t

a s su m e s th a t m an h a s the ca p a c ity fo r ra tio n a l d ec is io n -m a k in g , bu t

re c o g n iz e s a p ro b ab ility of n o n - ra tio n a lity beco m in g a co n tro llin g fa c to r

in the ju d ic ia l p ro c e s s u n le s s c a re is tak en to av o id such a tu rn of e v e n ts .

In the fa c e of e ffo r ts by p a r t i s a n s in the le g a l c o n te s t to ob ta in a d e c is io n

by any m e a n s , ra tio n a l o r o th e rw ise , the le g a l sy s te m i s desig n ed to

include su ffic ien t reg u la tio n s to a s s u re a h igh p ro b a b ili ty of ra tio n a lity

in the u ltim a te leg a l d e c is io n . H ow ever, the r e p o r ts of a tto rn e y s -« w h o se

ta sk i t i s to p e r fo rm d a ily a s le g a l p a r t is a n s - - in d ic a te th a t n o n -ra tio n a lity

re m a in s a p o ten t fo rc e in ju r is p ru d e n c e ,

298

299

The q u e s tio n re m a in s , th en , to w hat ex ten t i s the th e o ry of r a ­

tio n a l d e c is io n -m a k in g , a s p ra c tic e d in the A m e rica n le g a l s y s te m ,

v a lid ? I t i s the p u rp o se of th is c h a p te r b r ie f ly to e x p lo re th e ap p ro a ch es

w hich have b een ta k e n to the a n sw erin g of th is q u estio n ,

0

Two co m m en ts m u s t be m ade re g a rd in g o rg an iz a tio n . F i r s t , the

v a lid a tio n e ffo r ts h av e tended to fo cu s on the v a r io u s ta s k s of ad ju d i­

ca tio n in d iv id u a lly . T h u s, th is c h a p te r w ill con fo rm to th a t p o licy and

follow a p a t te rn s im i la r to that of C h a p te r IV , although no t inc lud ing a ll

the ta s k s . Second, m e th o d s of v a lid a tio n tend to d ivide e a s ily in to two

ty p e s - - c r i t i c a l and e3q>erim ental. The c r i t ic a l ap p ro a c h es to v a lid a tio n

ten d to com e f ro m m e m b e rs of the le g a l p ro fe s s io n and fo llow the le g a l-

lo g ic a l p a t te rn . E x p e rim e n ta l d a ta m o s t freq u en tly co m es f ro m the

f ie ld s of p sy ch o lo g y , so c ia l p sy ch o lo g y , and in two in s ta n c e s , f ro m

p o li t ic a l s c ie n c e . W ith o ccas io n a l e x ce p tio n s , th is c h a p te r w ill d isc u s s

d a ta f ro m the two m eth o d s se p a ra te ly .

L a w y e r-C lie n t In te rv ie w s

One s e r ie s of in v es tig a tio n s d es ig n e d to ", , , ex p lo re the s ig n i­

f ic a n t b u t n e g le c te d f ie ld of le g a l co m m u n ica tio n , , , , " h a s begun by

in v es tig a tin g a tto rn e y to c lien t co m m u n ica tio n , The r e s u l t s of Üiis

^Wayne N , T hom pson and S, I n s a la ta , "C om m unica tion f ro m A tto rn e y to C lie n t, " T he Jo u rn a l of C om m unica tion , XIV (M arch , 1964), pp , 22 -33 ,

300

study h ave a lre a d y b een d is c u s s e d in C h apter IV , but the m eth od d e s e r v e s

so m e ad d ition al co m m en t h e r e . The m eth o d of th is study w a s a q u e s tio n ­

n a ir e sen t to 320 a tto r n e y s in C h icago , of w h ich f if ty - th r e e w e r e retu rn ed .

The in v e s t ig a to r s w e r e s a t is f ie d that the sa m p le co n stitu ted a r e a so n a b le

c r o s s - s e c t io n of the le g a l p r o fe s s io n in C h icago .

T he f i r s t p a r t o f the q u estio n n a ire sought in form ation co n cern in g

(1) the r e la t iv e im p o r ta n c e o f f iv e p o s s ib le s o u r c e s o f b reak d ow n s in

com m u n ication ; (2) th e a t to r n e y s ’ s e l f -a n a ly s e s of th e se so u r c e s ; (3)

th e ir su g g e s te d so lu tio n s ; and f in a lly (4) co m m u n ica tio n b a r r ie r s in

addition to the f iv e w h ich w e r e to b e ranked by the r e sp o n d e n ts , ^

A seco n d p a r t of the q u estio n n a ire u t il iz e d the " c r it ic a l in cid en t"

tech n iq u e , a m eth od u se d in p sy c h o lo g y w h ich a sk ed the resp o n d en t to

"give the m o s t in te r e s t in g exam p le of a breakdow n in a t to r n e y -c lie n t

com m u n ica tion in you r own p e r s o n a l e x p e r ie n c e , " A th ird step in the

q u e s t io n n a ir e --a n o p en -en d ed in v ita tio n to m ak e add itional c o m m e n ts - -

ten ded to c o n firm p r e v io u s c o n c lu s io n s .

In con c lu d in g , the au th ors o f th is stu dy sta te that the s p e c if ic

fin d in gs o f the study a r e l e s s s ig n if ic a n t than the " grou n d -b reak in g naturd'

of th e ir p r o je c t in g e n e r a l. W hile th ere h a v e b e e n m any s tu d ie s in th is

a r e a , sa y the a u th o r s , ", , . n e v e r b e fo r e h a s th e re b een an a ttem p t to

^Ib id ,, pp, 22; 24, ^ Ib id ,, p . 30,

301

in v e s tig a te th e p ro b le m m u ltid im e n s io n a lly an d sy s te m a tic a lly . Beyond

th is q u e s tio n n a ire , the a u th o rs p la n to c o n s tru c t " . . . a le g a l v o ca b u la ry

te s t a s a s c re e n in g and r e s e a r c h in s tru m e n t an d a r e e x p e rim en tin g w ith

d iffe re n t a u d i to r / anti v isu a l m o d es of p re s e n tin g a le g a l docum en t to

laym en .

E v id en c e in the T r ia l C o u rt

P ro b a b ly the m o s t th o ro u g h ly in v e s tig a te d a sp e c t of the le g a l p r o ­

c e s s is th a t of ev a lu a tin g ev id en ce in judg ing q u e s tio n s of fa c t. T h is

p ro c e s s in c lu d e s the lo g ic a l foundation of th e t r i a l c o u r t , d i r e c t e x a m i­

n a tion , w itn e ss te s tim o n y , and c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n .

B a s ic to the s y s te m of d e te rm in in g q u e s tio n s of fa c t i s the p r e ­

sum ed lo g ic a l foundation . F e l ix S. C ohen, in 1950, p re s e n te d a c r i t ic i s m

of th is foundation . ® C ohen’s th e s is w as th is .

The d is a g re e m e n ts of opposing la w y e rs on s ta te m e n ts of s im p le fa c t , an d the even w id e r d is a g re e m e n ts th a t c h a ra c te r iz e th e ir v iew s on m o re c o m p lic a te d fa c ts (’opinion* and *law*), c a ll fo r a m o re hum ane an d so c ia l v iew of t ru th and m ean in g th an a p p e a rs in m o s t of the t ra d it io n a l lo g ic b o o k s. T h is i s n o t to say th a t the t ra d it io n a l lo g ic b o o k s a r e w ro n g . I t i s only to say th a t so f a r the lo g ic ia n s , h av ing c o n c e n tra te d th e i r v is io n on the lo g ica l h eav en s w h ere w o rd s con tinue a t r e s t and m ean the sam e thing f o re v e r , h ave n o t fu lly ex p lo red the im p e r fe c t e f fo r ts of hum an b e in g s to co m m u n ica te w ith each o th e r . ^

^ Ib id . , p . 33.

^ F e lix S. C ohen, " F ie ld T h eo ry and J u d ic ia l L o g ic , " The Y ale Law J o u rn a l, V ol. 59 ( J a n u a ry , 1950), pp . 238-272 .

^ Ib id . , p . 242.

302

Cohen su g g es ts th a t le g a l lo g ic ia n s could b en e fit f ro m a study of the

p h y s ic a l s c ie n c e s . He say s th a t E in s te in ’s co n tr ib u tio n w as the d ev e lo p ­

m en t of fo rm u la e " , , , by w hich d iffe ren t acco u n ts of the sam e p h y s ic a l

even t m ay be c o r re la te d w ith ea ch o th e r , so th a t f ro m the p o s itio n and

d ire c tio n of an even t in any p h y s ic a l sy stem we can c a lc u la te i t s p o s itio n

and d ire c tio n in any o th e r sy s te m ,

T h u s , he s a y s , i t i s n e c e s s a ry in the law to c o n s tru c t a log ic

w hich can acco m o d ate ’t r u th ’ in i t s v a rio u s fo rm s ; th a t w hat a p p e a rs to

be an h o n e s t t ra n s a c tio n fro m one p e rsp e c tiv e •»vill a p p e a r ’crooked*

f ro m a n o th e r . He c a lls fo r a lo g ic ", , , fro m w hich we can p re d ic t the

su c c e ss iv e ’d is to r t io n s ’ th a t any o b se rv e d so c ia l f a c t w ill undergo a s i t

p a s s e s th ro u g h d iffe re n t value -c h a rg e d f ie ld s in the ’w o r ld - l in e ’ of i ts

h is to ry , " He d e s c r ib e s "w o r ld - lin e " a s a te r m u s e d in p h y s ics to

include a l l the s e r ie s of lo c a tio n s of a body in s p a c e - t im e . T hus, law

m u s t be ab le to cope w ith " a c c u ra te " re p o r ts of the sam e "fac t" which

oa r e d ia m e tr ic a lly opposed.

T h u s , in the t r i a l of q u es tio n s of fa c t, n o te s Cohen, the law

s e a rc h e s fo r c a u sa l re la t io n s . W as the neg ligence of A the cau se of the

acc id en t su ffe red by B ? A c tu a lly , if s t r ic t lo g ic w e re em ployed, the

s tr in g of c a u s a l re la tio n s could b e c a r r ie d to in fin ity , fo r if B had no t

^Ibid . Sibid.

303

b een d riv in g a t a c e r ta in tim e in a c e r ta in p la c e , the n eg lig en ce of A

could n o t h av e c au se d the a cc id en t; and , if B h ad n e v e r b een b o rn , th e re

w ould hav e b een no a c c id e n t, and so on, "W hat we a c tu a lly do, " co n ­

tin u es C ohen, "w hen we lo o k fo r a le g a l cau se i s to p ic k out of th is

in fin ity of in te rs e c tin g s tra n d s a u se fu l po in t a t w hich pub lic p r e s s u r e

can be p la c e d . "9 T h is p o in t i s s e le c te d b e c a u se i t i s b e lie v e d th a t som e

im p ro v em en t in so c ia l conduct can be ach iev ed o r som e re l ie f ob ta ined

fo r th e p la in tiff . T h u s , the cau se of an a c c id e n t i s n o t a lto g e th e r a

q u es tio n of fa c t b u t a com bination of fa c t and v a lu e ju d g m en t.

R esu ltin g f ro m h is c r i t ic a l a n a ly s is a r e , a c c o rd in g to Cohen, a

n u m b er of p ro p o s itio n s w hich cou ld be te s te d e x p e r im e n ta lly .

1. The m o re re p re h e n s ib le the conduct, the m o re read ily w ill ju d g es find a c a u sa l connection b e tw een the conduct and the in ju ry co m p la in ed of.

2. T he m o re h a te fu l the defendan t, the m o re re a d ily w ill ju d g es find a c a u sa l connection b e tw een the defendan t and the in ju ry co m p la in ed of.

3. A ju d g m en t a g a in s t a h igh ly re s p e c te d c itiz e n h a s a l a r g e r p re c e d e n t va lue than a ju d g m en t a g a in s t a d e sp ise d p e rso n ; c o n v e rse ly , a ju d g m en t in fav o r of a d e sp is e d p e rso n h a s a la r g e r p re c e d e n t va lue th an one fo r a p i l la r of so c ie ty .

4 . A va lue d if fe re n tia l in a ttitu d e of judge and ju ry tow ard a g iven c la s s w ill be r e f le c te d in d iffe re n c e s of ju d g m en t a s to w h e th e r in d iv id u a ls of the g iven c la s s a r e re sp o n s ib le fo r the w ro n g s co m p la in ed of,

O bviously , if Cohen*s a n a ly s is is to be ac c e p te d , then the a s su m e d r a ­

tio n a l b a s is of the le g a l p r o c e s s m u s t be s ig n ifican tly a d ju s te d . To th o se

9 lb id ., p . 243. lO lb id ., p . 259.

304

who h o ld in fa v o r of the s tre n g th of fa c t and log ic a s o p p osed to the n o n -

ra tio n a l in flu en ces in the t r i a l c o u r t , Cohen is say ing th a t such a b e lie f

i s a t l e a s t p a r ty m yth .

A t the v e ry h e a r t of a t r i a l of fa c t is the a s su m p tio n th a t the le g a l

p ro c e s s o f fe rs a re lia b le m eth o d fo r s e c u rin g an a c c u ra te p ic tu re of an

ev en t in the m in d of the judge o r ju ry . The so u rc e of th e e v e n t-p ic tu re

i s m o s t com m only the te s tim o n y of w itn e s s e s , and the m ed iu m i s the

q u estio n in g of the w itn e s s e s by opposing co u n se l. U nderly ing th is sy s te m

a r e a n u m b er of a s su m p tio n s . O ne, a w itn e ss p r e s e n t a t the scen e of an

ev en t i s ab le to p e rc e iv e the ev en t w ith re a so n a b le a c c u ra c y ; tw o, the

w itn e ss i s ab le to r e p o r t h is p e rc e p tio n s in such a w ay th a t h is p e rs o n a l

ju d g m en t w ill n o t e x c e ss iv e ly d is to r t the re p o r t; and th re e , th a t a w it­

ness* m e m o ry i s su ffic ien t to a llo w a co m p le te r e p o r t of h is e x p e r ie n c e s

(the "w hole tru th " ) a f te r a d e lay . T h ese a r e a few of the a ssu m p tio n s

th a t do no t even inc lude a c tio n s of the a t to rn e y s , n o r the ju d g m en t of the

ju ry . The sy s te m fu r th e r a s s u m e s th a t a c c u ra c y of r e p o r t i s b e s t

o b ta in ed th ro u g h d i r e c t q u estio n in g by an a tto rn e y g and th a t the c r e d i ­

b ili ty and a c c u ra c y of the w itn e ss can b e s t be te s te d th ro u g h a

c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n of an opposing a tto rn e y . The le g a l p ro c e s s ex p ec ts

th a t ru le s of a d m is s ib il i ty w ill e ffec tiv e ly co n tro l th e flow of n o n -ra tio n a l

p ro o fs to a ju ry , and th a t ju ry m e m b e rs th e m se lv e s a r e m o s t cap ab le of

305

judging w hich of s e v e ra l w itn e sse s should b e b e lie v e d . F in a lly , the

le g a l s y s te m e x p e c ts th a t a ju ry w ill poo l i t s c o lle c tiv e know ledge, v a lu e s ,

e x p e r ie n c e s , and a r r iv e a t a fa c t- ju d g m e n t b a s e d upon th e ev idence p r e ­

sen ted in c o u r t , and com bine th is fa c t- ju d g m e n t w ith th e law a s g iven by

the judge to fo rm a v e rd ic t .

Som e of th e se a s s u m p t on,3 h av e b een in v e s tig a te d fo r v a lid ity .

A p p lica tio n of p sy c h o lo g ic a l s tu d ie s to te s tim o n y d e s e rv e f i r s t m en tio n .

W ritin g f i r s t in 1909, Hugo M u n s te rb e rg m ad e a la s tin g im p re s s io n upon

th e le g a l p ro fe s s io n b y challeng ing m an y of the a s su m p tio n s of v a lid ity

of f i r s t - h a n d te s tim o n y , ^^ S ta ted s im p ly , M u n s te rb e rg re p o r te d the

fin d in g s of e x p e r im e n ts w hich su g g ested th a t w i tn e s s e s ’ p e rc e p tio n v a r ie d

and i t i s q u ite p o s s ib le th a t s e v e ra l w itn e s s e s o b se rv in g the sam e even t

m ay r e p o r t d iffe re n tly w ithou t in ten tio n a l d is to r t io n . In f a c t , l a te r

s tu d ie s ten d ed to in d ic a te th a t e y e -w itn e ss te s tim o n y i s m o s t f req u en tly

in c o n s is te n t w ith the f a c ts a s w ell a s w ith o th e r w itn e s s e s , H ow ever,

the r e p o r te r s f ro m psy ch o lo g y le f t open a door of v a lid ity to the litig a tio n

p ro c e s s by no ting .

E r r o r s in o b se rv a tio n such a s th e se do n o t, of c o u r s e , c o n s ti­tu te th e w hole s to ry . I t i s p o ss ib le th a t the ju ry m ay b e able

^^Hugo M u n s te rb e rg , On The W itn ess S tand (New Y ork: C la rk B o a rd m a n , C o , , L td , , 1923),

^^H aro ld E r n e s t B u r t t , L eg a l P sy ch o lo g y (New Y ork : P r e n t ic e - H a ll, I n c , , 1940), pp , 14-16 .

306

to s if t som e of th is co n flic tin g ev idence and b r in g a ju s t v e rd ic t; b u t th e g r e a te r the d is a g re e m e n t and the m o re n u m ero u s the e r r o r s in o b se rv a tio n , the g r e a te r is the ju r y 's ta sk .

M odern d is c u s s io n s of th is su b jec t seem to su p p o rt th e se co n c lu s io n s .

T h is in fo rm a tio n , th e re fo re , ten d s ag a in to em p h as iz e the im p o rta n c e of

ju d g m en t b y the ju ry in re sp o n se to the s tim u li p re s e n te d to th em in the

c o u r t. I t e m p h a s iz e s the s ig n ifican ce of the w ay in w hich an a tto rn e y

p re s e n ts h is w itn e s s e s , q u es tio n s th em , and how they re sp o n d to c r o s s -

ex am in a tio n . T h a t i s , i t e m p h a s iz e s the p ro o fs of a l e s s c le a r ly ra tio n a l

n a tu re .

In v e s tig a tio n s of the v a lid ity of the ju ry o r judge re sp o n se to the

w ide ran g e of p ro o fs ju s t m en tio n ed have no t b een p e r fo rm e d ex ten s iv e ly .

Of th is a r e a of in v e s tig a tio n , th e fo llow ing s ta tem e n t w as m ad e by a

r e s e a r c h a s s o c ia te a t Y ale L aw School holding advanced d e g re e s in

p sycho logy a s w e ll a s a law d e g re e .

T he proceduB S of law involve s tu d ied e s tim a te s of b e h av io r a s p a r t of the ju r i s t i c p r o c e s s and ev a lu a tio n . The s ig n ifican ce and th e r e l ia b i l i t ie s of c o u r tro o m b e h av io r and the e fficacy and a p p ro p r ia te n e s s of ru le s and p r a c t ic e s re q u ire stud ied a n a ly s is .

On th e w hole , law fin d s in the c u r re n t p sy ch o lo g ica l a n s w e rs , w h e re th e re p u rp o r t to be any , an in su ffic ie n cy of d a ta , a la c k

Ib id , , p . 16.

^^See C a r ro l l A . W h itm er, "P sy ch o lo g y in Law and in C rim in o - logy , " i n J . S tan ley (ed. ), P sy ch o lo g y in U se (New Y ork; A m e ric a n Book C om pany, 1951)

307

of p e rs p e c tiv e on the so c ia l co m p lex ity of the i s s u e s i t s tu d ie s , a n d , by im p lic a tio n , a la c k of su ffic ien t a n a ly s is and re f le c tio n fo r u t i l i ta r ia n p u rp o se . The d a ta th a t e x is ts is sp o rad ic and p o o r ly f it te d . P sy c h o lo g ic a l f ra m e s of re fe re n c e a r e m o stly n o t o rd e re d to any su b s ta n tia l v iew of so c ia l r e a l i t ie s , and m an y of the g e n e ra liz a tio n s th a t is s u e a re e x c e ss iv e ly co n je c ­tu r a l and , o ften s im p ly a rg u m e n ta tiv e .

An ex am p le of the k ind of v a lid a tio n th is w r i te r c a lls fo r is a study of the

ju d g m en ts m ad e by ju d g es and ju r ie s of w itn e ss c re d ib ili ty on the b a s is

of m a n n e r of e x p re s s io n by th e w itn e s s . One study su g g ests th a t i t is

n e c e s s a ry to u n d e rs ta n d the p a r t ic u la r w itn ess b e fo re such ju d g m en ts

can b e m ad e v a lid ly . The study su g g es ts th a t som e w itn e sse s a p p e a r

gu ilty of in te n tio n a l p e r ju ry b e c a u se of signs of ten s io n re su ltin g f ro m

o th e r c a u s e s . B u t, a s i s s ta te d above, the av a ila b le in fo rm a tio n is

qu ite l im ite d in th is a r e a . T he Y ale r e s e a r c h a s s o c ia te concludes :

In te r m s of c u r re n t p e r s p e c t iv e , i t w ould a p p e a r th a t the d im e n sio n a lity of in d iv id u al b e h a v io r is th e p sy ch o lo g ica l con ­tr ib u tio n given g r e a te s t no te in le g a l thought and le g a l p r o c e s s e s .T he s y s te m a tiz a tio n of co n cep tio n s of the i r r a t io n a l and a f a i r co m p o sitio n a l u n d e rs tan d in g of the re la tio n sh ip b e tw een the ra t io n a l and the i r r a t io n a l— o r , in m o re b a s ic p sy ch o lo g ica l t e r m s , th e cognitive and the e m o tio n a l- - is the l a r g e s t and m o s t sp e c ific in q u iry th a t law d i r e c ts to w ard p sycho logy today . The r e f e r e n c e s , in bo th in s ta n c e s , a r e sought in v a r io u s f ra m e s of so c ia l e x p e r ie n c e , bu t i t i s p r e c is e ly th is la t t e r s o r t of d a ta th a t i s la rg e ly , though n o t e n t ire ly , m is s in g .

^^ R o b ert S. R edm ount, "A P an to sco p ic V iew of Law and P sy c h o ­logy* " ZSHZSfÉ,2É&2SÊ1 E d u c a ü o n , V ol. 10, No. 4 (1958), pp . 442-443 .

^^K arl G e rb e r t , "T he P sy ch o lo g y of E x p re s s io n and the T echnique of C r im in a l In te rro g a tio n , " Jo u rn a l of P sycho logy and P sy c h o th e ra p y ,V ol. 2 (1954), pp . 85-98 .

17R . S. R edm ount, og. c i t . , p . 448.

308

The s tu d ie s of w itn e ss p e r fo rm a n c e , th e re fo re , e m p h a s iz e the

im p o rta n c e of the a tto rn e y s in the t r i a l . In lig h t of the p ro b le m s im p li­

c it in te s tim o n y , the u ltim a te d e c is io n of judge o r ju ry r e l i e s h eav ily

on the e ffec tiv e n e ss of ex am in a tio n and c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n .

In M arch of 1956 the Society fo r the P sy c h o lo g ic a l Study of Social

I s s u e s and the S ocie ty fo r th e Study of S ocia l P ro b le m s h e ld a sym posium

on "W itn ess P e r fo rm a n c e u n d e r S t r e s s . "1® A m ong o th e r q u e s tio n s

d eem ed d e se rv in g of e x p e r im e n ta l v e r if ic a tio n w e re th e se ; (1) to w hat

e x ten t do es the p r e - t r i a l c o v e rag e by n e w sp a p e rs tend to in tim id a te

w itn e s s e s and to f ix the a ttitu d e of ju r o r s ; (2) to w hat e x te n t d o es a

s la sh in g a tta c k in a p u b lic c o u r tro o m ten d to b r e a k down a w itn e ss and

g e t m o re tru th fu l a n sw e rs ; and (3) to w hat ex ten t does i t h e lp an u n tra in e d

o b s e rv e r such a s a ju r o r to judge th e c re d ib ili ty of a w itn e s s by allow ing

h im to w atch the w itn e ss te s t i fy , o r s im ila r ly , to w hat e x te n t does

d em ean o r in the ab se n c e of s t r e s s and u n d e r v a r io u s ty p e s of s t r e s s

re v e a l c re d ib ili ty . C le a r ly , th e se q u e s tio n s seek to e x p lo re the v a l i­

d ity of the a ssu m p tio n in th e le g a l p ro c e s s th a t th e co m b in a tio n of

ex am in a tio n and c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n b e fo re a ju ry w ill p ro b a b ly re v e a l a

ra tio n a l con clu sio n re g a rd in g the ev en t in q u es tio n .

^®The v a r io u s r e p o r ts of th is sy m p o siu m c o n s titu te th e e n tire is s u e of The Jo u rn a l of S o c ia l I s s u e s , XIII, No. 2 (1957).

^9Ja c k B , W ein s te in , "T he L aw ’s A ttem p t to O b ta in U sefu l T e s t i ­m ony, " T ^ J o u r i ^ of S o c l ^ I s s u e s , o£. c i t . , pp . 6 -11 .

309

F o r ex a m p le , w ith r e g a rd to c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n m any p r a c t i t io n e r s

a g re e w ith one r e p o r tin g to the sy m p o siu m th a t s t r e s s i s a n e c e s s a ry

in g re d ie n t of c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n in g e ttin g a t the t ru th . He sa id th a t

s t r e s s f ro m q u es tio n in g on c o l la te r a l m a t te r s such a s the w itn e s s ' c r i ­

m in a l b ack g ro u n d o r r e p o r ts of h o m o sex u a lity w ill in c r e a s e the

p ro b a b ility of b r in g in g the w itn e ss to s ta te w hat he b e lie v e s to be tru e .

H o w ev er, a t th e sam e m e e tin g , a n o th e r p r a c t i t io n e r d is a g re e d w ith th is

co n c lu s io n . He c la im e d th a t d ra m a tic re v e la tio n s and b reak d o w n s of

w itn e s s e s m a y o c c u r in the la w y e r 's o ffice b u t r a r e ly - - e x c e p t on te le ­

v is io n - -d o e s i t happen in c o u r t. If a w itn e ss h a s com e to c o u r t

re so lv e d to te l l a fa ls e s to ry , then the ch an ces a r e th a t i t w ill b e re v e a le d

only th ro u g h d i r e c t c o n tra d ic tio n and co n flic tin g c irc u m s ta n c e s r e la te d

in the te s tim o n y of o th e r w itn e s s e s . T h is le a v e s the f in a l co n c lu sio n

to the in te rp re ta t io n of the judge o r ju ry . W ith r e g a rd to s t r e s s u nder

c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n , th is p r a c t i t io n e r c la im s , a s the q u es tio n in g in c r e a s e s

s t r e s s , " It b e c o m e s in c re a s in g ly a p p a re n t to the w itn e ss th a t he cannot

re m a in n e u tr a l and th a t he m u s t defend h im se lf by choosing s id e s , "

^ ^ H a r r is B . S te in b e rg , "T he P r a c t i t io n e r S peaks Out: W itness P e r fo rm a n c e a s Seen by a T r ia l A tto rn e y , " J o u rn a l of S o c ia l I s s u e s , op. c i t . , pp . 30 -31 .

21pavil W. W illia m s , "T he P r a c t i t io n e r S peaks O ut: W itness P e r fo rm a n c e a s V iew ed by a U. S. A tto rn e y , " J o u rn a l of S ocia l I s s u e s , op . c i t . , pp . 34 -35 .

^ ^ Ib id . , p . 34.

310

The w itn e ss a lm o s t a lw ays ch o o ses the side th a t c a lle d h im to te s tify ,

and once the cho ice is m ad e , the w itn e ss b eco m es c e r ta in of ev ery th in g

23he s a y s . If th is v iew i s tak en , a d riv in g c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n could be

esqjected to r e s u l t in m o re h a rm than good w ith r e g a rd to the ju r y 's

a ttitu d e to w a rd th e e x a m in e r 's p o s itio n .

The ev idence is co n flic tin g , th e re fo re , co n cern in g the ro le of

c ro s s -e x a m in a tio n in b rin g in g the ju ry to a ra tio n a l d e c is io n . Some

s tu d ie s su g g es t th a t te s tim o n y i s m o s t a c c u ra te and co m p le te when c o m ­

b in ed w ith f r e e r e c i ta l and d i r e c t ex am in a tio n , and th a t c ro ss -e x a m in a tio n

b r in g s out l e s s co m p le te in fo rm a tio n , m o re in a c c u ra te in fo rm a tio n , and

e l ic i ts m o re "d o n 't know " a n s w e rs . Y e t, on the o th e r h an d , the

p e r s i s te n t e x p e r ie n c e of la w y e rs te s t i f ie s to the e f fe c tiv e n e ss of c r o s s -

ex am in a tio n to re v e a l a fa ls e o r in a c c u ra te s to ry . The u ltim a te t e s t ,

of c o u rse , i s w hat the ju ry u s e s to fo rm i t s d ec is io n and the d e g re e to

w hich the ju ry d e c is io n i s c o n s is te n t w ith r e a l i ty , o r , th a t i s , how

ra tio n a l i s the j u r y 's d ec is io n .

D ec is io n by J u ry

The p u rp o se of the ju ry in a t r i a l a t law i s n o t p r im a r i ly to e n ­

han ce the ra t io n a li ty of th e d e c is io n . R a th e r , the ju ry is h e ld to be a

^^I b id . , p . 35. 24h , E , B u r t t , o£. c i t . , p . 146,

25 B rian A , G ro sm an , "T e s tin g W itness R e l ia b i l i ty ," The C r im i­n a l L aw Q u a r te r ly , V ol. 5 (N ovem ber, 1962), pp. 318-327.

311

sa fe g u a rd fo r the peop le a g a in s t o p p re s s io n by the s ta te ; i t is ex pected

th a t a ju ry w ill a c t a s a r e p re s e n ta tiv e of the v a lu es w ith in the im m e ­

d ia te so c ie ty and m odify p o ten tia lly h a r s h ru le s of law . H o w ever, the

ju ry i s s t i l l ex p ec ted to o p e ra te w ith in the c la s s ic a l a s su m p tio n of the

ra t io n a l c a p a c ity of m an , A ju ry is s t i l l ex pected to w ithhold d ec is io n

u n til a l l ev idence h a s b een p re s e n te d and to m ake i t s d e c is io n w ith in the

con fines of the ev id en ce , and the law a s g iven by the ju d g e . J u ry

d e c is io n s a r e n o t ex p ec ted to b e c a p r ic io u s o r n o n -ra tio n a l.

N e v e r th e le s s , th e re is ev idence to su g g est th a t ju r i e s do not

behave a s e3q>ected. A s one c r i t ic p u t it»

P e r h a p s nothing in the e n tire r e a lm of advocacy s e rv e s the p u rp o se s of th o se d e te rm in e d to avo id a d ec is io n b a s e d on a c le a r - c u t is s u e a s does an in s is te n c e on the r ig h t to a t r i a l by ju ry . H e re i s a m eth o d of rea.ching a d ec is io n th a t d e fie s lo g ic a l ju s t if ic a tio n . I ts sh o rtc o m in g s a r e n o to rio u s , , , , ^^

One w r i te r h a s p r e p a re d a l i s t of q u a lif ic a tio n s a ju r o r should be re q u ire d

to m e e t b e fo re being s e le c te d fo r du ty . B oth the c h a r a c te r of the dem an d s

m ad e in th e l i s t and th e reco g n itio n of the fa c t th a t c u r re n tly no such

q u a lif ic a tio n s a r e en fo rce d s tro n g ly in d ic a te s a la ck of confidence in

p r e s e n t ju r y d e c is io n s . The q u a lif ic a tio n s a r e th ese :

1. C r i t ic a l T hinking A b ility , I t i s e s s e n tia l th a t the p ro sp e c tiv e ju r o r b e ab le to d raw sound in fe re n c e s f ro m d a ta

A dlew , "T he D ia lec tic of A dvocacy , " B oston U n iv e rs ity L aw R ev iew , XXXVI (F a ll , 1956), p , 582,

312

and o b s e rv a tio n s , to re c o g n ize im p lie d a s su m p tio n s , to re a s o n lo g ic a lly by deduction and in te rp o la tio n , and to ev a lu a te s tre n g th and re le v a n c e of a rg u m e n t.

2, P e r s o n a l i ty S ta tu s . The p ro sp e c tiv e ju r o r should b e f re e of such m e n ta l d is o rd e r and em o tio n a l in s ta b il i ty a s w ould p ro d u c e an undue p reo c c u p a tio n w ith h is own p ro b le m s of a d ju s tm e n t, and a s ig n if ic an t d is to r t io n of re a l i ty .

3, A ttitu d in a l O r ie n ta tio n . The p ro sp e c tiv e ju r o r shou ld no t be in se n s it iv e o r opposed to the g e n e ra lly a c ce p ted v a lu e s and co n d itio n s su rro u n d in g hum an p ro p e n s it ie s and hum an f r a i l ty , so c ia l o rd e r and the re q u ire m e n ts of d isc ip lin e , c h a r i ty and co m p ass io n a te u n d e rs ta n d in g , ju s t ic e , eq u a lity and in te g r i ty . He shou ld be f r e e of any m o rb id p re o c c u p a tio n o r a ttitu d e w hich w ould m a te r ia l ly co lo r h is p e rc e p tio n s and u n d e rs tan d in g of p eo p le and e v e n ts .

4 , S o c ia l P e rc e p tio n . The p ro sp e c tiv e j u r o r 's o b se rv a tio n and in te rp re ta t io n of b e h a v io r should no t be so fau lty a s to be th o ro u g h ly in a c c u ra te , and h is ju d g m en t in so c ia l s itu a tio n s should n o t r e f le c t m a rk e d n a iv e te o r g u llib ility .

5, G e n e ra l In fo rm a tio n . The p ro sp e c tiv e ju r o r should no t la c k such a fund of g e n e ra l in fo rm a tio n a s w ould p re v e n t a m in im a l a w a re n e s s of th in g s and ev en ts in so c ie ty n e c e s s a r y fo r an e le m e n ta l a d ju s tm e n t.

6, G e n e ra l In fo rm a tio n A bout the In s titu tio n of L aw . The p ro sp e c tiv e j u r o r should n o t be to ta lly ig n o ra n t o r g ro s s ly m is in fo rm e d a s to the c h a ra c te r an d function of g e n e ra lly known le g a l p r o c e s s e s and le g a l p e rso n n e l, ^7

The a u th o r of th is p ro p o sa l w ould a lso t e s t fo r m e m o ry and h o n es ty of

the p ro sp e c tiv e ju r o r if he could d e v ise a w ay to t e s t th e se i te m s .

C le a r ly , if one m u s t p o s s e s s such q u a lit ie s to p e r fo rm the ta s k of ra tio n a l

d e c is io n -m a k in g , then c u r r e n t ju r i e s a r e fa llin g s h o r t of th e goal (even

if i t i s a s su m e d liia t ju r i e s a r e tru ly re p re s e n ta t iv e of a l l a b ili ty le v e ls ,

^ ^ R o b e rt S. R edm ount, "P sy ch o lo g ic a l T e s ts fo r S e lec tin g J u r o r s , " K an sas L aw R eview , V ol. 5 (1957), p . 401.

313

w hich is d en ied b y p r a c t i t io n e r s ) , and if th is i s the c a s e , th en s e r io u s

doubt i s c a s t on th e a s su m e d rh e to r ic a l th e o ry in th e t r i a l co u rt.

F ro m the e x p e r im e n ta l r e s e a r c h in to ju r y b e h a v io r add itional

s tre n g th is g iven the a s su m p tio n of a s tro n g ly n o n - ra t io n a l c h a ra c te r in

ju ry d e c is io n s . One study ex am in ed the b e h a v io r of a ju ry a s a function

of the p r e s t ig e of the fo re m a n and the n a tu re of h is le a d e rsh ip ,^ ® F o u r

ju ry p a n e ls w e re m a tc h e d in th is e x p e r im e n t, and e ach w as p ro v id ed

w ith a t r a in e d e x p e r im e n te r a s a le a d e r , unknow n to the r e s t of the ju ry .

E a c h ju ry h e a rd the sam e c a s e a s p re s e n te d b y a c to r s and law s tu d en ts

fo llow ing an a c tu a l t r a n s c r ip t in c o u r tro o m c o n d itio n s . Im m ed ia te ly

a f te r the t r i a l , th e ju ry co m p le te d a q u e s tio n n a ire d ea lin g w ith im p o r t­

an t a s p e c ts of the c a se and th en r e t i r e d to a ju r y ro o m to d isc u s s and

d ec id e the c a s e . Im m e d ia te ly follow ing the d e c is io n a n o th e r q u e s tio n n a ire

w as co m p le ted . B oth q u e s tio n n a ire s invo lved s ta tin g the is s u e s of the

c a se and in d ica tin g a " y e s " o r "no" an sw er to th e m ,

F o r each p an e l a d if fe re n t type of le a d e rs h ip w as u se d by the

fo re m a n . The ty p e s in c lu d ed h igh p re s t ig e a u to c ra t ic ; low p re s tig e a u to ­

c r a t ic , h igh p r e s t ig e d e m o c ra tic and low p r e s t ig e d e m o c ra tic . Two such

^® W illiam B e v a n , R o b e r t S, A lb e r t, P i e r r e R , L o i seaux . P e te r N, M ay fie ld , and G eo rg e W rig h t, " Ju ry B eh a v io r a s a F u n c tio n of the P r e s t ig e of the F o re m a n an d th e N a tu re of h is L e a d e rs h ip , " Jo u rn a l of P u b lic L aw , V ol. 7 (F a ll , 1958), pp , 419-449 .

2 9 lb id ,, p . 423,

314

e3q>erim ents w e re p e r fo rm e d and s ta t is t ic a l m e a s u re m e n t em ployed in

each . The co n c lu sio n s show ed an in c o n s is te n c y b e tw een the two e x p e r i­

m e n ts . In the f i r s t , le a d e rsh ip d id n o t have a s ta t is t ic a l ly s ig n ifican t

c o n s is te n t in flu en ce upon the dam age aw a rd , b u t in the second experim ent^

the a u to c ra tic le a d e r p ro d u ced a g r e a te r re la tiv e sh ift th a n d id the dem o­

c ra tic ; the le v e l of p re s t ig e d id n o t a p p e a r to b e s y s te m a tic a lly

in flu en tia l in e i th e r e x p e rim e n t. A cco rd in g to the e x p e r im e n te rs , the

d a ta d e m o n s tra te (including the in c o n s is te n c y b e tw een the two e x p e r i­

m en ts and the d iffe re n tia l in the e ffec tiv e n ess of v a r io u s le a d e r s ,

. . . the ex ten t to w hich the s itu a tio n a l and o th e rw ise c irc u m ­s ta n tia l f a c to r s in fluence w hat i s a s su m e d to b e a co m p le te ly ra t io n a l a c tiv ity --h o w the p la in tiff f a re s depends not only upon the m e r i t s of h is c a s e , b u t upon the ju ry th a t h e a r s i t , and upon th e p e rso n a li ty and b e h a v io r of the ju ry fo re m a n , 31

A d d itio n a l in fo rm a tio n w as ob tained in the second ex p e rim en t.

The n u m b er of s ta te m e n ts m ad e d u rin g each d e lib e ra tiv e se s s io n , the

p e r cen t of the to ta l m ade by the le a d e r , and the n u m b er of b a llo ts taken

p r io r to unan im o u s a g re e m e n t w as checked . F ro m th is d a ta , i t i s

le a rn e d th a t th e h ig h -p re s tig e a u to c ra tic le a d e r w as m o s t in flu en tia l,

hav ing b ro u g h t h is g roup to a g re e m e n t a f te r one b a llo t. Follow ing in

o rd e r in th is rank ing w as the low p re s t ig e a u to c ra t ic , h igh p re s tig e

d e m o c ra tic , and la s t w as the low p re s t ig e d e m o c ra tic le a d e r . I t w as

^Qlb id . , p . 433. 31jb id , , p . 434. ^^Ib id . , p . 435.

315

n o ted th a t th is o rd e r c o rre sp o n d e d c lo se ly to the ra n k o r d e r of am ount

of a w a rd s p re s e n te d by the ju r ie s . " T h is is c le a r e v id en ce , " s a id the

e x p e r im e n te r s , " , . . th a t group opin ion re f le c ts to a s ig n if ic a n t d eg ree

the v iew of an e ffec tiv e l e a d e r - - o r in b ro a d te r m s , th a t re a s o n m ay in

la rg e m e a s u re be p e rsu a s io n . T h is l a s t s ta te m e n t i s s ig n if ic a n t in

th e a n sw erin g of the q u es tio n of the v a lid ity of the ra t io n a l rh e to r ic

a s su m e d in the le g a l p ro c e s s .

A n ex ten s iv e and continuing study is be ing m ad e of ju ry b eh a v io r

a t the U n iv e rs ity of C hicago . The fin d in g s of th is s tu d y , s im i la r to the

o th e r s , r e v e a l s e r io u s re a so n to doubt the ra tio n a lity of ju ry d e c is io n s .

A lthough the f in a l r e p o r t of the U n iv e rs ity J u ry P r o je c t h a s no t b een

p u b lish e d , som e p re l im in a ry d a ta is a v a ila b le and som e d is c u s s io n of

the m e th o d s of in v e s tig a tio n h a s b een m ad e .

T h is study h a s p ro ce ed ed a long two lin e s of in v e s tig a tio n ; one

h a s b een the in te rv iew in g of ju r o r s and ju d g es who hav e p a r t ic ip a te d in

a c tu a l t r i a l s , and the o th e r h a s invo lved the c re a tio n of e x p e r im e n ta l

ju r ie s f o r the study of p ro b le m s no t p o s s ib le w ith r e a l j u r i e s . F o r

ex a m p le , 1500 ju r o r s who had se rv e d on 213 d iffe re n t c r im in a l c a s e s in

C hicago and B ro o k ly n w e re in te rv iew ed w ith re g a rd to the im p o rta n c e of

3 3 lb id ., pp . 435-436 .

3 4 0 a le W. B ro e d e r , "The U n iv e rs ity of C hicago J u ry P r o je c t , " N e b ra sk a Law R ev iew , V ol. 38, No. 2 (1959), pp . 744-760 ,

316

the d e lib e ra tio n s of ju r i e s . I t w as d is c o v e re d th a t in a lm o s t e v e ry c a se

a b a llo t w as tak en im m e d ia te ly ; in th i r ty p e r c en t of th e c a s e s the f i r s t

b a llo t w as unan im ous an d tlie d ec is io n m ad e . In the re m a in in g sev en ty

p e r cen t of the c a s e s w hich show ed d iffe re n c e of opinion on the f i r s t

b a llo t , " , , . the m a jo r i ty on the f i r s t b a llo t a lm o s t a lw ays won,

T he m a jo r ity won in ab o u t n ine ty p e r c e n t of th e se c a s e s , and i t d id no t

m ak e any d iffe re n c e who c o m p rise d the m in o r i ty - -n e i th e r w ea lth y n o r

p o o r p e r s o n s , m en o r w om en, "T he b ro a d po in t su g g ested , of c o u rs e ,

i s th a t m o s t c r im in a l c a s e s a r e d ec id ed d u rin g the t r i a l and n o t d u rin g

the d e lib e ra tio n s , " In th e v e ry few c a s e s in w hich a m in o rity v iew on

th e f i r s t b a llo t b e c a m e the m a jo r ity u ltim a te ly , i t w as n e c e s s a r y th a t

th e m in o rity be a t l e a s t a s s tro n g a s th re e f ro m the f i r s t ,

A co n c lu sio n m o s t re le v a n t to th e q u es tio n of the co n flic t b e tw een

th e p r a c t i t io n e r s ' r h e to r ic a l th e o ry and th a t p re su m e d b y the le g a l sy s te m

w as d a ta co n cern in g the d iffe re n c e am ong ju r o r s a s d e c is io n m aJcers, I t

h a s b een shown in C h ap te r IV th a t p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s b e lie v e th e e thn ic

b ack g ro u n d of a j u r o r in flu en c es h is re a c tio n to a t r i a l . The le g a l sy s te m

p re s u m e s th a t such n o n - ra tio n a l in flu en c es can be avo ided . T he d a ta in

th is study su g g e s ts th a t p e r s o n s w ith G erm an and B r i t is h b ack g ro u n d s

^ S lb id ,, p , 747, 3 6 ib id ,, p , 748,

317

a r e m o re lik e ly to fa v o r the g o v e rn m e n t and th o se of N eg ro , S lav ic and

I ta lia n d e sc e n t m o re lik e ly to fa v o r acq u itta l.

A n o th er ap p ro a c h to th e in v e s tig a tio n in v o lv ed hav ing ju d g es

co m p le te q u e s tio n n a ire s in ju ry t r i a l s . B efo re a j u r y 's d e c is io n w as

aJinounced, the t r i a l judge w as a sk e d to in d ica te , am ong o th e r th in g s ,

how he w ould h av e v o ted had th e r e b een no ju ry . The study in c lu d ed

3 ,0 0 0 q u e s tio n n a ire s , h a lf f ro m c r im in a l c a s e s and th e o th e rs of a p e r ­

so n a l in ju ry v a r ie ty . In the f i r s t p la c e , i t can be p re d ic te d th a t the aw a rd

f ro m a p e rs o n a l in ju ry su it w ill b e f ro m fo rty to fif ty p e r cen t h ig h e r in

an E a s te rn m e tro p o lis than in a M idw est o r S o u th ern r u r a l com m unity .

F u r th e r , in a c r im in a l c a s e , th e judge and ju ry a g re e d e ig h ty -o n e p e r

c e n t of the t im e , and in p e r s o n a l in ju ry c a s e s th ey a g re e d e ig h ty - th re e

p e r cen t of the t im e . A m ong the d isa g re e m e n ts in c r im in a l c a s e s i t

w as d isc o v e re d th a t ju d g es w e re c o n s id e ra b ly m o re p ro n e to con v ic t.

H ad a l l 1500 c r im in a l c a s e s b e e n t r ie d by a judge a lone th e re w ould have

b e e n h a lf a s m an y a c q u it ta ls . A lso , the d is a g re e m e n ts cam e m o s t .

f re q u e n tly in s ta tu to ry rap e c a s e s w h ere the ju ry ac q u itte d in n inety p e r

c e n t of c a s e s w h e re th e judge w ould have con v ic ted . Of in te r e s t in the

p e rs o n a l in ju ry c a s e s w as the f a c t th a t the d a ta d id n o t su p p o rt the

p o p u la r a ssu m p tio n th a t ju r ie s a r e m o s t in c lin ed to fin d the defenden t

37lbid. 38ib id ., p. 749.

318

liab le and re d u c e the a w ard when ev idence is w eak. On the c o n tra ry ,

th e re w as l i t t le d iffe ren ce b e tw een judge and ju ry in find ing fo r d efen ­

d an ts .

D riv in g d ire c tly in to the h e a r t of the ra tio n a lity a s su m e d in le g a l

d e c is io n -m ak in g i s the finding of " ju s tic e " v ary in g a c c o rd in g to the type

of litig a n t.

If the defendant i s an in d iv id u a l, the judge and ju r y p ra c tic a lly n e v e r d if fe r on the q u e s tio n of lia b ili ty b u t the j u r y 's aw ard w h ere the v e rd ic t is fo r the p la in tiff is ap p ro x im a te ly ten p e r ­c en t h ig h e r than th a t of the ju d g e . If the defendan t i s a c o rp o ra tio n th e re b e g in s to be a d iffe ren ce even on the q uestion of l ia b il i ty . The ju ry fin d s a g a in s t c o rp o ra tio n s two p e rc e n t m o re th an does the ju d g e . A nd if the defendant i s a c ity o r s ta te , th e ju ry finds l ia b il i ty in e igh t p e rc e n t m o re of the c a s e s . The s itu a tio n on the dam age side is s im i la r . W here the defendan t is a c o rp o ra tio n o r a c ity o r s ta te an d the v e rd ic t i s fo r p la in tiff , the ju ry a w a rd s ap p ro x im a te ly tw en ty -fiv e p e r ­c e n t m o re than does th e ju d g e . , , , If the ju ry f in d s a ra i lro a d l ia b le , the aw ard is abou t th i r ty p e rc e n t h ig h e r th a n th a t of the ju d g e . . . .'^0

T h e re w as no s ig n ifican t d iffe re n c e d isc o v e re d b e tw een s ta te and fe d e ra l

ju d g es and b e tw een s itu a tio n s invo lv ing w ritte n in s tru c t io n s and a

ju d g e 's su m m ary of the ev id en ce and com m ents on th e w eigh t of the

ev idence , and c a s e s in w hich th e se th ings w ere not do n e .

In the e x p e rim e n ta l ju ry s itu a tio n s , tape re c o rd in g s of m ock

t r i a l s b a s e d on ac tu a l t r i a l s w e re p re p a re d and p la y ed to s e v e ra l d if fe re n t

p an e ls of p e r s o n s ac tu a lly c a lle d fo r ju ry duty. A lso , the d e lib e ra tio n s

^^Ib id . , p . 750. '^Olbid., p p . 750-751,

319

of the ju ry w e re re c o rd e d and in te rv ie w s of the ju r o r s a t v a r io u s s tag e s

of the c a se w e re m ad e . A t th e tim e of th is r e p o r t , fo u r m oo t c a s e s had

b een d ev e lo p ed and p layed to o v e r 100 ju r ie s .

Som e of the in fo rm a tio n th u s gained h as su g g es ted th a t ju r ie s do

in fa c t lo w er the am ount of th e a w a rd when ev idence of l ia b il i ty i s w eak.

The d a ta f u r th e r support the a ssu m p tio n m ade by t r i a l r u le s th a t when

the ju ry know s a defendant to be in s u re d the am ount of th e a w a rd ten d s

to in c re a s e . W hen ju r ie s b e lie v e d the defendant to have no in su ra n c e ,

the a v e ra g e a w a rd w as $33 ,000 ; w h ere the defendan t d isc lo s e d th a t he

had in su ra n c e and the a tto rn e y s d id not r a is e an o b jec tio n , the av e rag e

aw ard ro s e to $ 3 7 ,000 . B u t th e d a ta a lso c a s t s e r io u s doubt on s tan d a rd

c o u rt p ro c e d u re s fo r c o r re c tin g the in fluence of n o n - ra t io n a l p ro o fs .

When the defendan t ad m itted he h ad in su ra n c e , the a t to rn e y s r a is e d

o b jec tio n s , and the judge in s t ru c te d the ju ry to d is r e g a rd th is in fo rm a tio n ,

the a v e ra g e a w a rd w as in c re a s e d to $46 ,000 . "T he o b jec tio n and

in s tru c tio n to d is re g a rd , in o th e r w o rd s ,, s e n s itiz e the j u r o r s to the

fa c t th a t th e defendant is in s u re d and th e re b y in c r e a s e th e aw ard .

Such in fo rm a tio n r a i s e s a q u estio n a s to the so u rc e of a conclusion

on the p ro p e r am ount of an a w a rd . W here do the ju r ie s ob ta in a s tan d a rd

fo r se ttin g such am o u n ts? T he a n s w e r , f ro m th is study , h a s b een th a t

4 1 lb id ., p . 754.

320

in c a s e s w h e re the p la in tiff in d ic a te s how m uch m oney he w an ts and the

defendant d o es n o t p re s e n t and a rg u e in fa v o r of a m o re re a so n a b le

am oun t, the ju r i e s a r e in c lin ed to s t a r t w ith w hat they th in k w as the

p la in t i f f s r e q u e s t , cu t i t in h a lf a s a ru le , and r e p o r t th e ir d e c is io n .

In any of th e se c a s e s , i t should b e em p h as iz ed , if a c tu a l c o u r t p ro c e d u re

w e re fo llow ed the lo sin g p a r ty cou ld go b e fo re a c o u r t of ap p ea ls and

a rg u e th a t r e v e r s ib le e r r o r h a d b ee n co m m itted , a s , fo r ex am p le , in

the c a se w h ere in fo rm a tio n r e le v a n t to the in su ra n c e of the defendan t

w as m ad e so a p p a re n t. T h is , of c o u r s e , le a d s to a q u es tio n of the

v a lid ity of the th e o ry of the a p p e lla te a rg u m e n t, and a p p e lla te ju d ic ia l

d e c is io n -m a k in g .

A p p ella te A dvocacy

M ore c r i t ic i s m h as b een d ire c te d to w ard th e a p p e lla te p ro c e d u re s

than to w ard any o th e r p a r t of the le g a l p ro c e s s . T h is i s a s i t should b e .

F o r i t i s in th e c o u r ts of ap p ea l th a t a l l the th e o re t ic a l a ssu m p tio n s

und erly in g the ap p lica tio n of law m e e t th e i r u ltim a te t e s t . In the fin a l

a n a ly s is , the rh e to r ic a l th e o r ie s of the le g a l p ro c e s s a r e u se d in the a c t

of approv ing th e i r u s e . A p p e lla te c o u r ts o p e ra te w ith in a co n tex t of

ra tio n a l d e c is io n -m ak in g b a se d upon the w ritte n and o r a l a rg u m e n ta tiv e

e ffo rts of co u n se l; the a im of the a p p e lla te c o u rt i s to p a s s ju d g m en t upon

4 2 ib id ., p . 759.

321

th e ra t io n a li ty w ith w hich f a c t and law w as b ro u g h t to g e th e r in the c o u rt

b e lo w , ag a in a s a r e s u l t of a rg u m e n ta tiv e e f fo r ts of a t to rn e y s , o r to

ap p ro v e o r d isa p p ro v e the ra tio n a lity of a d e c is io n of a lo w e r ap p e lla te

c o u r t .

A f i r s t s tep to w a rd v a lid a tio n of th e a p p e lla te p r o c e s s h a s b een to

in q u ire a f te r the c h a r a c te r of d e c is io n sough t. O bviously th e d ev e lo p m en t

of a s y s te m a tic th e o ry of d e c is io n -m a k in g m u s t r e s t upon an u n d ers tan d in g

of the e ffec ts d e s ir e d f ro m the a p p lic a tio n of the sy s te m . If one is to

c r i t ic iz e the rh e to r ic of a p p e lla te ad v o cacy , he m u s t f i r s t g e t in m ind

w h at i s th e o b je c t of th e p e r s u a s iv e e f fo r t of the a tto rn e y . The r h e to r ic a l

a p p ro a c h w ill v a ry , undoub ted ly , depending upon w h e th e r the ob jec t of

th e b r ie f and o r a l a rg u m e n t i s to help the judge see th a t " th e law " r e s t s

w ith one s id e o r a n o th e r; o r th a t "the law " ought to r e s t w ith one side o r

a n o th e r ; o r s im p ly to b r in g the judge in to a f ra m e of m in d w hich w ill be

in s tru m e n ta l to h is vo ting in fa v o r of one s id e o r a n o th e r in the ju d ic ia l

c o n fe re n c e , w hile p ro v id in g the judge w ith su ffic ien t le g a l ra tio n a liz a tio n

to m ake such an e ffe c t a c c e p ta b le by th e com m unity a t la r g e .

W hat d e c is io n , th en , is the ap p e lla te judge ex p ec ted to m ak e? In

th e f i r s t p la c e , th e o b jec t d e s ir e d in a sy s te m of law is p re d ic ta b ili ty . A

c lie n t w an ts to know fro m h is a tto rn e y w hat he can ex p ec t to b e p e rm it te d

to d o --w h a t w ill be the le g a l re sp o n se to h is fu tu re ac tio n s» o r w hat w ill

322

the law say abou t a p a s t ev en t. The a tto rn e y can an sw er only in t e r m s

of p re d ic ta b le b eh av io r of the c o u rt, and th is m o s t com m only is done b y

r e fe re n c e to w hat the c o u r t h a s done in the p a s t . The assu m p tio n i s

th e re fo re m ad e th a t the ju d ic ia l re sp o n se i s c o n s is te n t- - th e law fo r a

g iven s e t of fa c ts today w ill s t i l l be so to m o rro w . The id e a l s itu a tio n ,

c le a r ly , w ould be a body of law e s ta b lish e d and p e rm a n e n t, a r is in g f ro m

u nquestioned s o u rc e s , and u n affec ted by ch an g e , and su ffic ien tly b ro a d

a s to p ro v id e fo r a l l p o s s ib le s itu a tio n s in fa c t . In such a s itu a tio n , th e

r h e to r ic a l ob ligation of co u n se l and co u rt w ould be a lo g ic a l d e m o n s tra ­

tio n , deductive in fo rm , showing the n e c e s s a ry re la tio n sh ip betw een

p r in c ip le s of law and sp ec ific fa c ts .

T h a t such a s itu a tio n does no t and , m o re o v e r , should n o t p r e v a i l

h a s b een the o b jec t of a rg u m en ts f ro m th o se c a lle d le g a l r e a l i s t s .

O p era tin g c r i t ic a lly , the le g a l r e a l is ts have f i r s t a tta c k e d the b a s ic m y th

of law a s s ta te d above, "E v en in a re la tiv e ly s ta tic so c ie ty , m en have

n e v e r b een ab le to c o n s tru c t a co m p reh en siv e , e te rn iz e d se t of ru le s

an tic ip a tin g a l l p o s s ib le le g a l d isp u tes and se ttlin g th em in advance , "

sa id J e ro m e F ra n k in h is L aw and the M odern M ind ,^^ C le a r ly , a f o r t io r i

such a sy s te m i s not p o s s ib le in m o d ern so c ie ty . N e v e r th e le s s , m e m b e rs

^ ^ Je ro m e F ra n k , Law and the M odern M ind (New Y ork; C o w ard - M cC ann, 1949), p . 6,

323

of the le g a l p ro fe s s io n p ro c e e d a s if they had such an id e a l sy s te m . Says

F ra n k ,

. . . o b se rv e the a rg u m e n ts of co u n se l in a d d re s s in g the c o u r ts , o r the v e ry op in ions of the c o u r ts th e m se lv e s : th ey a re w o rd ed a s if c o r r e c t d e c is io n s w e re a r r iv e d a t by lo g ic a l deduction f ro m a p r e c is e and p re -e x is t in g body of le g a l r u le s . Seldom do ju d g e s d isc lo s e any con tingen t e le m en ts in th e i r re a so n in g , any doub ts o r la c k of w h o le -h e a rte d conv iction . The ju d ic ia l v o c a b u la ry co n ta in s few p h ra s e s e x p re s s iv e of u n c e r ta in ty .

E cho ing F r a n k ’s c r i t ic i s m , p h ilo so p h e r M o rr is R ap h ae l Cohen c a lls

a tte n tio n b ack to the tim e (d isc u sse d in C h ap ter I) w hen law w as b e lie v e d

to have d iv ine sanction ; includ ing both the law of M o ses thought to have

b een h an d ed down f ro m God on M t. S inai and the m o re re c e n t E u ro p e an

tra d it io n of n a tu ra l r ig h ts com ing f ro m a n a tu ra l law e te rn a l and

unchanging . "T h e o rth o d o x v iew , " o b se rv e s C ohen, " is th a t the ju d g e s ,

e sp e c ia lly the ju d g es of the S uprem e C o u rt, a r e th e re to see th a t no

le g is la tio n c o n tra v e n e s th e se e te rn a l p r in c ip le s . T h is co n cep t, co n ­

c lu d es Cohen, h a s ". . . lo s t rep u te am ong sc h o la rs and th in k e rs . " He

co n tin u es , " In c re a s e d study h a s shown an am azin g v a r ia t io n a s to w hat

p r in c ip le s a r e c o n s id e re d ju s t . " C o u rts c le a r ly fa ce in c o n s is te n t v a lu e s

and r e v e r s e th e m se lv e s on the sam e v alu e fro m tim e to tim e . "In

4 4 lb id ., pp. 8-9 .

^ ^ M o rr is R ap h ae l Cohen, R easo n and Law (G lencoe, I llin o is : The F re e P r e s s , 1950), p . 137.

324

g e n e ra l , the p r in c ip le s of n a tu ra l law w hich h av e b e e n fo rm u la te d have

re p e a te d ly b e e n shown to b e m e a n in g le ss o r q u es tio n -b e g g in g . "^6

Such c r i t ic is m s tro n g ly in d ic a te s th a t th e r h e to r ic a l o b jec t of an

ap p e lla te ad v o ca te i s n o t s im p ly to p ro v e to the c o u r t th a t the "law "

n e c e s s a r i ly fa v o rs h is p o s it io n - -h e m u s t do m o re . If i t is re co g n iz ed ,

a s th is a rg u m e n t c la im s , th a t ju d g es e x e rc is e su ff ic ie n t d is c re tio n a s to

c re a te law w h ere th ey fe e l i t is n e c e s s a ry , th en i t fo llow s th a t r h e to r ic a l

a n a ly s is m u s t s e a rc h f u r th e r in to the n a tu re of p ro o f u se d to m ake such

d e c is io n s . Of t h i s , ’ Cohen s a y s .

W hen . . . ju d g es in the n am e o f . . . p r in c ip le s , decide th a t c e r ta in m e a s u re s a r e u n ju s t and th e re fo re u n co n s titu tio n a l, they a r e su b s titu tin g th e ir own op in ions fo r the d e lib e ra te ju d g m e n ts of o u r le g is la tu r e s and i t i s w e ll to n o te th a t the c o u r ts by th e i r v e ry co n s titu tio n do n o t h av e a s m uch a c c e s s to the f a c ts of th e c a se a s C o n g re ss o r the s ta te le g is la tu r e s .T hey canno t in s t i tu te in q u ir ie s . T hey a r e r e s t r i c t e d to b r ie f s an d o r a l a rg u m e n ts of a few h o u rs by two la w y e rs .

I t i s a s u p e rs ti t io n to suppose th a t the ju d g e ’s op in ions on eco n o m ic and so c ia l q u e s tio n s do no t in flu en ce h is d e c is io n s .H is to ry b e l le s th a t a s su m p tio n .

B en jam in C ard o zo c o n s id e re d ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m a k in g to in c lu d e

the sam e e le m e n ts a s le g is la tiv e d e c is io n -m a k in g , an d th e re fo re su g ­

g e s te d to the a p p e lla te ad vocate th a t he m u s t a p p ro a c h fo re n s ic p e r s u a s io n

a s he w ould d e lib e ra tiv e p e rsu a s io n . H ow ever, C a rd o zo w ould re c o g n iz e

d iffe re n c e s b e tw een the two s itu a tio n s . F o r ex a m p le , the judge m ay

find an obvious le g a l ru le to f it the p a r t ic u la r c a s e com ing fro m the

^ ^ I b id . , pp . 1 3 7 - 1 3 8 . 4 ? i b i d . , p . 138.

325

c o n s titu tio n o r a s ta tu te . If th a t h a p p e n s , say s C a rd o zo , th e judge need

look no f u r th e r . T he judge p ro c e e d s w ith the s a tis fa c tio n th a t a c le a r

c o n s titu tio n a l ru le w ill tak e p re c e d e n c e o v e r a s ta tu te , and th a t a s ta tu te

w ill com e b e fo re a ju d g e -m a d e law . B u t s t i l l a judge*s w o rk is n o t

su p e rflu o u s o r m e c h a n ic a l. T h e re w ill re m a in c a s e s th a t fa l l in gaps

in law o r w ith in a m b ig u itie s of th e law ; th e re m ay b e h a rd s h ip s and

d iff ic u ltie s re q u ir in g m itig a tio n . Of the le g a l m yth C ard o zo sa y s .

In te rp re ta t io n i s o ften spoken of a s if i t w e re no th ing b u t the s e a rc h and th e d isc o v e ry of a m ean in g w hich , h o w ev er o b sc u re and la te n t , h a d none th e l e s s a r e a l and a s c e r ta in a b le p r e ­e x is te n c e in th e l e g i s la to r 's m in d . The p r o c e s s i s , in d eed , th a t a t t im e s , b u t i t i s o ften so m eth in g m o re .

T he "so m eth in g m o re " of w hich C ard o zo spoke in c lu d ed the reco g n itio n

th a t le g a l ru le s an d p re c e d e n ts s im p ly fo rm the b a s is of the ju d g e 's

ap p ro a c h , and th a t le g a l d e c is io n -m a k in g is a p r o c e s s c o n s ta n tly d e v e ­

lop ing new in d u c tio n s w hich m odify the r u l e s . ^9 To th e a d v o ca te ,

C ard o zo say s th a t ju d ic ia l p ro o f w ill u ltim a te ly invo lve m an y in flu en c es .

My a n a ly s is of the ju d ic ia l p r o c e s s co m es th en to th is , and l i t t le m o re : logic» and h is to r y , and c u s to m , and u t i l i ty , and the a c c ep te d s ta n d a rd s of r ig h t conduct, a r e the f o rc e s w hich sing ly o r in co m b in a tio n shape the p r o g re s s of the law . W hich

^ ^ B en jam in N athan C ard o zo , T he N a tu re of the J u d ic ia l P r o c e s s (New H aven: Y ale U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1921), pp . 14-15 .

^^I b id . , p p . 4 7 -4 8 .

326

of th e se fo rc e s sh a ll dom inate in any c a s e , m u s t depend la rg e ly upon the c o m p a ra tiv e im p o rta n c e o r v a lu e of the so c ia l in te r e s t s th a t w ill be th e re b y p ro m o te d o r im p a ire d ,

A nd, C ardozo m ig h t have added , i t i s th e r e fo re the ta s k of the advocate

n o t only to show th e c o u r t th a t lo g ic , o r h is to r y , o r cu s to m o r u til i ty ,

o r w h atev er cou ld le g itim a te ly w a r ra n t d e c is io n in h is fa v o r , b u t the

advocate h a s the o p p o rtu n ity and the o b lig a tio n to p e rsu a d e the ju d g es

th a t v a lu e s and so c ia l in te r e s t s c a ll fo r th e se le c tio n of a p a r t ic u la r

p o s itio n . "If you a s k how he C the ju d g e j i s to know when one in te r e s t

ou tw eighs a n o th e r , " say s C ard o zo , "I can only a n sw e r th a t he m u s t g e t

h is know ledge ju s t a s the le g is la to r g e ts i t , f ro m ex p e rie n ce and study

and re fle c tio n ; in b r ie f , f ro m life i t s e l f ,

A lthough C ardozo*s a n a ly s is of d ec is io n -m a k in g is h igh ly c r i t ic a l

of the th eo ry w hich r e s t r i c t s p ro o fs to the a s su m e d c lo se d sy s te m of

le g a l p r in c ip le s , he c le a r ly s ti l l p re s u p p o s e s a ra tio n a l b a s is of d ec is io n .

A lthough he w ould b ro ad e n the se le c tio n of p ro o fs fo r the ap p e lla te

a d v o ca te , C ardozo a t i l l ex p ec ts th a t the f in a l d e c is io n w ill be c le a r ly

c o n s is te n t w ith the ex p ec ted v a lu e s of la w —im p a r t ia l i ty , ad h e ren ce to

p re c e d e n t w h ere p o s s ib le , ab so lu te av o id an ce of p re ju d ic e , w him o r

f itfu ln e ss ; s y m m e tr ic a l developm en t of le g a l ru le s c o n s is te n t w ith .

h is to ry o r cu s to m o r lo g ic , w hile b a lan c in g sy m m e try w ith equ ity and

f a i rn e s s , C e r ta in ly C ardozo does no t p e rc e iv e ju d ic ia l d ec is io n -m ak in g

^ ° Ib id . , p . 112, ^ % i d . , p , 113, ^ ^ Ib id ,, pp . 112-113.

327

ai; re su lt in g f ro m n o n -ra tio n a l s o u rc e s o r u l te r io r and u n s ta te d m o tiv e s ,

J e ro m e F ra n k is not so g e n e ro u s . To F ra n k , the e la b o ra te s ta te m e n ts

of the ra t io n a l b a s is of ju d ic ia l d e c is io n s a r e nothing m o re than r a t io n ­

a liz a tio n s - - "T h i s p ra c tic e of m ak ing o u rse lv e s a p p e a r , to o u rse lv e s and

o th e r s , m o re ra tio n a l than we a r e , , , . The need fo r ra tionaliza tion^

a c c o rd in g to F ra n k , co m es f ro m the n eed to develop c e r ta in ty , s e c u r ity ,

r ig id ity , an d u n ifo rm ity in the law w hile a t the sam e tim e m ak ing the

sy s te m function p ra c tic a lly in day by day s itu a tio n s . T h e se p ra c t ic a l

an d id e a l g o a ls a r e s e lf -c o n tra d ic to ry , bu t th e co n flic t i s co n cea led in

p r a c t ic e b y se rv in g the p r a c t ic a l n eed and concealing i t w ith su ffic ien t

ra tio n a liz a tio n to suggest th e id e a l o p e ra tio n , F ra n k a c c u s e s ju d g es

of p ro d u c in g a sy llo g is tic m ach in e - lik e c e r ta in ty in a d e c is io n w hich

m ig h t h av e fa v o re d e ith e r s id e .

T he w eak n ess of th e u se of fo rm a l lo g ic i s now exposed .The c o u r t can decide one w ay o r the o th e r and in e i th e r ca se can m ak e i t s reaso n in g a p p e a r equally f la w le ss . F o rm a l log ic i s w hat i ts nam e in d ic a te s ; i t d e a ls w ith fo rm and no t w ith su b stan ce . The sy llo g ism w ill n o t supply e ith e r the m a jo r p re m is e o r the m in o r p re m is e . The 'joker* is to b e found in the se le c tio n of th e se p r e m is e s . In the g re a t ru n of c a s e s w hich com e b e fo re the c o u r ts , the se le c tio n of p r in c ip le s , and the d e te rm in a tio n of w h e th er the fa c ts a r e to be s ta te d in te rm s of one o r an o th e r m in o r p r e m is e , a r e the ch ie f ta s k s to be p e r fo rm e d . T h ese a r e d ifficu lt ta s k s , fu ll of h a z a rd s and u n c e r ta in t ie s , b u t the h a z a rd s and u n c e r ta in tie s a r e o rd in a r ily co n cea led b y the glib u se of fo rm a l lo g ic ,

F ra n k , og. c i t , , p , 30, p , 66,

328

F ro m such an a n a ly s is i t is p o s s ib le to conclude th a t if the judges have

w ide cho ice in a d e c is io n beyond s ta te d ru le s and a u th o r it ie s then the

ta s k of the ad v o ca te m u s t a lso b e to p r e s e n t p ro o f th a t g o es beyond

s ta te d ru le s and a u th o r it ie s of law . F u r th e r , the lo g ic a l end of F r a n k 's

lin e of re a so n is th a t "the law " can n e v e r be known w ith c e r ta in ty w ithou t

a sp ec ific p ro n o u n cem en t of a c o u r t on a sp ec ific s e t of f a c ts , and even

then i t i s su b jec t to fu r th e r ap p ea l.

A sp ec ific a p p lica tio n of such co n c lu sio n s w as m ad e to the r h e ­

to r ic a l th e o ry of a p p e lla te advocacy by K a r l N. L lew elly n in 1946. To

la w y e rs w hose c a r e e r s had b een in te r ru p te d by w ar L lew elly n sa id a

m o d e rn v iew of advocacy w as c a lle d fo r . The ta s k of an ap p e lla te ad v o ­

c a te , he sa id , w as to p e rsu a d e th e c o u r t to h is v iew of th e law and of

the fa c ts of h is c a s e . To do th is , th e advocate m u s t u n d e rs ta n d the

m e th o d s of the court.. The c o u r ts , sa id L lew elly n , h av e and fee l a duty

n o t only to the law b u t to th e ir own fee lin g s of w hat i s ju s t , decen t, and

f a i r . Such ju d g m en ts n e c e s s a r i ly d if fe r fro m one ju s t ic e to an o th e r and

the ad v o ca te m u s t study the in d iv id u a ls in the fo rm u la tio n of a rg u m en t.

In lig h t of th is lin e of re a so n in g , i t i s c le a r ly no t enough fo r the law y er

to p r e s e n t only a te c h n ic a lly p e r f e c t c a s e . If th e re i s r e a l m e r i t in the

c o n flic t, th e re w ill b e a te c h n ic a lly p e r fe c t c a se p o s s ib le on the o th e r

^ ^ K arl N. L lew elly n , "T he M odern A pproach to C ounselling and A d v o c a c y --E sp e c ia lly in C o m m e rc ia l T ra n s a c tio n s , " C olum bia Law R ev iew , XLVI (M arch , 1946), p p . 167-195.

329

side a s w e ll. "T he s tru g g le w ill then be fo r ac ce p tan c e by the tr ib u n a l

of the one te c h n ic a lly p e r fe c t v iew of th e law a s a g a in s t th e o th e r . "

T hinking r h e to r ic a l ly , th en , "A ccep tan ce w ill tu rn on som eth ing beyond

’le g a l c o r re c tn e s s * . M ore sp e c if ic a lly , say s L lew e lly n ,

. . . the r e a l and v i ta l c e n tr a l job is to sa tis fy the c o u r t th a t sen se and decen cy and ju s t ic e re q u ire (a) the ru le w hich you con tend f o r in th is type of s itu a tio n ; and (b) the r e s u l t th a t you co n ten d fo r , a s b e tw een th e se p a r t ie s . Y our w hole c a se , on law an d f a c ts , m u s t m ake se n se , m u s t ap p ea l a s being obvious s e n s e , in e sc a p a b le s e n se , sen se in s im p le te r m s of life and ju s t ic e . If th a t i s done, & tec h n ica lly sound c a se on the law th e n g e ts r id of a l l fu r th e r d ifficu lty ; i t show s the c o u r t th a t i t s duty to ju s t ic e bu t u rg e s along the e x a c t sam e lin e .

Such a th e o ry , in d eed the e n t i re th e o ry of the le g a l r e a l i s t s , does not

su p p o rt a co n cep t of ra t io n a l rh e to r ic in le g a l ad v o cacy . On the c o n tra ry ,

the v e ry s tro n g su g g estio n a r is in g f ro m such c r i t ic is m i s th a t leg a l

advocacy h a s th e fu ll r e a lm of p e rs u a s io n a t i ts d is p o s a l , and the a t to r ­

ney who f a i ls to m ake fu ll u se of tliis oppo rtu n ity w ill l ik e ly be le f t

b eh ind by th o se who do.

T he id e a should no t be le f t , h o w ev e r, th a t a p p e lla te ju d ic ia l

d e c is io n s a r e h a p h a z a rd . L lew elly n , speak ing ag a in in I960 , a rg u e s

th a t i t i s p o s s ib le to ap p ro ach the d e c is io n s of the c o u r ts f ro m a m o d e rn

b e h a v io ra l sc ie n c e po in t of v iew and s t i l l no t conclude th a t they a r e the

p ro d u c t of u n c o n tro lled and th u s u n p red ic tab le s tim u li. " F o r the fa c t i s , "

^ ^ Ib id ., p . 181. ^ 7 lb id .. p . 183.

330

contends L lew e lly n , " th a t the w o rk of our ap p e lla te c o u r ts a l l o v e r the

coun try is re c k o n a b le .

I t i s re c k o n a b le f i r s t , and on a re la tiv e sc a le , f a r beyond w hat any sane m a n h a s any b u s in e s s expecting fro m a m a c h in e ry devoted to se ttlin g d isp u te s s e lf - s e le c te d fo r th e i r to u g h n ess .I t is reck o n ab le second , and on an ab so lu te s c a le , q u ite su ffi­c ien tly fo r sk ille d c ra f ts m e n to m ake u sab le an d v a lu ab le ju d g m en ts abou t lik e lih o o d s , ajid qu ite su ffic ien tly to r e n d e r the hand ling of an ap p ea l a f ittin g sub jec t fo r e ffec tiv e and sa tis fy in g c ra f tsm a n sh ip .

L lew elly n ’s th e s is is th a t th e re i s a d iffe ren ce be tw een ad h e ren ce to

ru le s and lo g ic to the ex c lu sio n of a l l e lse and the s y s te m a tic ap p lica tio n

of sen se o r r e a s o n to sp ec ific p ro b le m s . Of the fo rm e r m e th o d , he

say s ju d g es t r i e d to do th e ir dec id in g w ithout re fe re n c e to m uch excep t

ru le s and a im e d a t the e lim in a tio n of the im p a c t of s e n se a s an in tru s io n ,

and w anted to w r i te th e i r op in ions a s if w isdom as o p p osed to logic w ere

h a rd ly a d e c en t a t t r ib u te , A lthough such an im ag e p re v a i ls into the

1960*s, say s th is a u th o r , the c o u r ts in ac tu a lity do n o t o p e ra te along

such l in e s . R a th e r , c o u r ts o p e ra te w ith in a w ide ran g e of k inds of

ac tio n . T hey d a ily engage in a p r o c e s s of c re a tiv e ch o ice . Y et such a

wide ran g e of cho ice " , , , in no w ay p ro d u ces an undue u n reck o n ab ility

of r e s u l ts , S ense i s in co n s ta n t u se in the ap p e lla te c o u r ts , in a ll

S ^K arl N , L lew ellyn , The Com m on Law T ra d itio n (Boston;L it t le , B row n and Com pany, I9 6 0 ), p , 4,

59ib id , ^Oibid-,, p , 5, ^ I jb id .

331

ty p es of c a s e s . B u ilt in to the sy s tem a r e su ffic ien t steady ing f a c to rs

to a s s u r e th is con tinual ap p lica tio n of re a so n . L lew ellyn in c lu d es am ong

th e se f a c to rs th e follow ing: 1) ju d g es g row up in a leg a l e n v iro n m e n t

an d a r e cond itioned to re sp o n d in a m a n n e r c o n s is te n t w ith th a t e n v iro n ­

m en t; .2) the a p p e lla te c o u r t o p e ra te d u n d e r heavy in fluence of le g a l

d o c tr in e and d o c tr in a l te ch n iq u es com m only known; 3) m e re ly becom ing

a judge im b u es one w ith a s e n se of re sp o n s ib ili ty fo r ju s tic e ; 4) th e re

is a tra d it io n of one s ing le r ig h t an sw e r and the c o u rt m u s t w r ite out

i t s opinion in a w ay to p e rsu a d e o th e r ju d g es and li tig a n ts of i t s ju s tic e ;

5) th e r e c o rd of fa c ts i s u su a lly f ro zen f ro m the lo w er co u rt; 6) the

i s s u e s a r e l im ite d , sh a rp e n e d , sp ec ific a lly p h ra se d ; 7) the e f fo r ts of

a d v e r s a ry a rg u m e n t by co u n se l p ro v id e a reck o n ab ility ; 8) the d e c is io n

of an ap p e lla te c o u r t i s a g roup d ec is io n and the r e s u l t of in te ra c tio n

am ong the ju s t ic e s who b e n e f it f ro m ju d ic ia l s e c u rity and h onesty ; 9)

th e m e m b e rs of the c o u r t a r e known to a l l , th e i r r e c o rd of d e c is io n ­

m ak ing is av a ilab le to anyone. Such ch eck s do not n e c e s s a r i ly p ro v id e

re c k o n a b ility of such a sw eeping c h a ra c te r a s d re a m e d of in the id e a l

le g a l sy s te m , sa y s L lew elly n . B ut they p ro v id e i t fo r the sp ec ific c a s e - -

w hich is the r e a l c o n c e rn of the a tto rn e y .

^ ^ Ib id ., pp . 19-61.

332

The v e ry re a s o n th a t ap p e lla te c o u r ts e x is t is th a t th e re is doubt, th a t sk ille d m en do not a g re e ab o u t the ou tcom e. To re q u ire re c k o n a b ility is th e re fo re to re q u ire the a b su rd ly im p o ss ib le . N e v e r th e le s s , l e t i t be re p e a te d : th is am az in g in s titu tio n , o u r L aw , a n sw e rs in s ig n ifican t d eg ree to the dem and. T h a t f a c t i s v ita l . I t n ee d s know ing. I t a lso n e e d s u se .

To the rh e to r ic ia n , th en , th is au th o r is saying th a t th e r e i s m e r i t

in studying the p ro b a b ili t ie s of a p p e lla te advocacy ; of seek ing to le a r n

m o re of the w ide cho ice of p e r s u a s iv e o p p o rtu n itie s open. B u t i t m u s t

be done w ithin a co n tex t of the le g a l sy s te m i ts e lf , fo r th is s t ru c tu r e

w ill continue to p ro v id e su b s ta n tia l c lu e s to the b eh av io r of a p p e lla te

c o u r ts .

T h e re i s , a cc o rd in g to L lew e lly n , a w ealth of r e s e a r c h opportun ity

in the study of ju d ic ia l op in ions. F ro m th is r e c o rd of the d ec is io n -m a k in g

p ro c e s s of ap p e lla te c o u r ts m uch could be le a rn e d about the v a lid ity of rh e ­

to r ic a l th e o r ie s u n d erly in g the ap p e lla te p r o c e s s i ts e lf . One r e c e n t study

a p p ro a c h e s ju d ic ia l op in ions a s rh e to r ic a l e f fo r ts d es ig n ed to p e r fo rm a

p e rsu a s iv e ta s k w ith r e g a rd to the g e n e ra l pub lic a s w ell a s th e sp ec ific

l i t ig a n ts , In th e opin ion of th is w r i te r , th e re would be v a lu e in r h e to r i ­

c a l c r i t ic is m of ju d ic ia l op in io n s, u s in g p r im a r i ly the r h e to r ic a l th eo ry of

^ ^ Ib id ,, p , 7,

^ ^ W arren E , W righ t, " Ju d ic ia l R h e to ric : A F ie ld fo r R e s e a rc h , " Speech M onographs, XXXI (M arch , 1964), pp , 64-72 ,

333

A r is to t le a s the ra t io n a le fo r c r i t ic i s m , L lew ellyn ex p an d s on th is th e ­

s is an d p ro p o se s v a r io u s c r i t ic a l and q u a n tita tiv e a p p ro a c h e s to the

study of ju d ic ia l o p in io n s . He su g g e s ts the study of the l in e s of in te r ­

ac tin g p e r s o n -a n d -p e rs o n a l i ty w ith in a w ork ing group such a s an

a p p e lla te c o u r t . To h im , the m a s s of d a ta av a ilab le in c o u r t r e p o r t s - -

no t of the U nited S ta te s S uprem e C o u rt f o r i t s p ro b le m s a r e d is t r a c t in g - -

of the v a r io u s s ta te s " , , , a r e g ifts to b e h a v io ra l r e s e a r c h a s v a luab le

, , , a s te n s of th o u san d s , , . ' ' o f r e p o r t s th a t m igh t b e g a th e re d in a

la b o ra to ry e x p e r im e n t, L lew elly n p ro p o s e s sy s te m a tic s tu d ie s of

r e a c tio n s of ju d g e s to c e r ta in b u s in e s s a r ra n g e m e n ts , o r a q u an tita tiv e

a n a ly s is of the g ro w th and n a tu re of d is s e n t , o r to o p e ra te "by the

d e ta ile d c a s e s tu d ie s , one of w hich su g g e s ts the pow er of a g r e a t ju d g e 's

p e r s u a s iv e n e s s b y w ay of su b s ta n c e , th e o th e r h is p o w er, in sp ite of

ab se n c e of su b s ta n c e , to m is le a d by p r e s t ig e and m a n n e r ,

L lew e lly n , w ritin g in I960 , d e c la re d th a t th e b e h a v io ra l s c ie n c e s

h ad fa ile d to tak e ad v an tag e of the r e s e a r c h o p p o rtu n itie s in law . While

th e re m ay b e d is a g re e m e n t on the v a lu e and p ro d u c tiv ity of such r e s e a r c h ,

i t d o e s , n e v e r th e le s s , e x is t . I t h a s a lre a d y been sa id th a t in the 1930*s

th e re w as m uch se n tim e n t am ong som e m e m b e rs of the p ro fe s s io n to

open up a c a se to the p sy ch o lo g ica l and so c io lo g ica l e n v iro n m e n t of the

65 K, N, L lew e lly n , 0£ , c i t , , p p , 514-515, ^^I b id , , p , 515,

334

le g a l d ec is io n -m ak in g p r o c e s s , R e c e n tly , th e re h as a r i s e n a m o v e­

m e n t to challenge the a p r io r i e s ta b lish m e n t of law a lto g e th e r and pu t

in i t s p lace w hat i s c a lle d e x p e rim en ta l ju r is p ru d e n c e , 68 B r ie f ly , th is

id e a p ro p o se s to develop an e v e n t-c e n te re d m eth o d of app ly ing law . The

d ec is io n of law would be b a se d on the e m p ir ic a lly d e te rm in e d v a lu e s of

w hat i s the in ten d ed p u rp o se of the law and w hat w ill be ach iev ed by a

p a r t ic u la r d ec is io n . The law would then a d ju s t to the changing n eed s of

each ev en t, r a th e r than t r y the fo rm a l lo g ic a l ap p ro ach of app ly ing p r e -

e s ta b lish e d p r in c ip le s , O bviously th is th e o ry to ta lly z e je c ts the

p re su m p tio n of e s ta b lish e d ra tio n a lity in th e law , and o ffe rs in i t s p lace

a sc ie n tif ic ap p ro ach to p ro b le m solv ing . Such a th e o ry , if ad op ted , .

w ould a lso s ig n ifican tly m odify the rh e to r ic a l ap p ro ach to th e ju d ic ia l

p r o c e s s - - c a l l in g in s te a d fo r an a lm o s t p u re ly s c ie n tif ic -d ia le c t ic a l

m ethod ,

^^See E d w ard S tevens R obinson, L aw and the La>vyers (New Y ork: The M acm illan C om pany, 1937), pp, 51-68 fo r a c le a r s ta te m e n t of th is sen tim en t,

6 8 F re d e r ic k K, B e u te l, Some P o te n tia l i t ie s of E x p e r im e n ta l Ju ris p ru d e n c e a s a New B ran ch of S ocia l S c ience (Lincoln: U n iv e rs ity of N e b ra sk a P r e s s , 1957), T h is e n tire book i s devoted to se ttin g fo rth the id e a b eh ind ex p e rim e n ta l ju r is p ru d e n c e ,

6 9 T h o m a s A , W ill, " L eg a l P r o b le m S o lv in g , " T u la n e L a w R e v ie w , XXXVI, (F e b r u a r y , 1962), p , 397,

335

M ore sp e c if ic a lly , e x p e r im e n ta l-q u a n tita tiv e a n a ly s is of ju d ic ia l

dec is ion -m éik ing h a s b een g e n e ra lly r e s t r i c te d to the study of the ju s t ic e s

in te r m s of th e ir a t t i tu d e s , g roup b e h a v io r , and p a t te rn s r e p re s e n te d in

d e c is io n s . The o b je c tiv e , m o s t f re q u e n tly , is to p r e d ic t d e c is io n s . In

a d is c u s s io n of the v a r io u s r e s e a r c h m eth o d s u s e d , G lendon S ch u b e rt (a

le a d e r in p o li t ic a l sc ie n ce q u a n tita tiv e a n a ly s is of c o u r ts ) c a lls a tte n tio n

to the a p p lica tio n of the G uttm an cu m u la tiv e sca le to s e ts of ju d ic ia l

v o te s . "T he r e s e a r c h done th u s f a r , " say s S ch u b e rt, " in cu m u la tiv e

sc a lin g in d ic a te s th a t th e re i s a h igh d e g re e of c o n s is te n c y in the a t ti tu d e s

of S u p rem e C o u rt ju s t ic e s to w a rd the r e c u r r e n t i s s u e s ’of pub lic p o licy

th a t c h a ra c te r iz e th e ir w o rk lo ad . In te rm s of an ex p lan a tio n of the

m e th o d of c o u r t d e c is io n s , say s S ch u b e rt, such a c o n s is te n c y of re sp o n se

in in d iv id u a l ju d ic ia l voting " . . . a p p e a rs to p ro v id e a m uch b e t te r

g e n e ra l ex p lan a tio n . . . th an does the a l te rn a tiv e tra d it io n a l th e o ry of

s ta r e d e c is is , th a t c o n s is te n c y in the m an ip u la tio n of p re c e d e n tia l le g a l

ru le s and p r in c ip le s is a fun ctio n of le g a l c ra f ts m a n sh ip . "71

A second ap p ro ach to the study of ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m a k in g h a s

b e en to v iew the c o u r t a s a sm a ll group and apply the m e th o d s w hich have

b e e n developed fo r sm a ll g roup a n a ly s is . S. Sidney U lm er r e p o r ts a

"^^Giendon S ch u b ert (ed . ) Ju d ic ia l D ec is io n -M ak in g , In te rn a tio n a l Y earb o o k of P o li t ic a l B eh a v io r R e s e a rc h , Vol. 4 (New Y ork: The F r e e P r e s s of G lencoe , 1963), p . 3.

71lbid.

33d

study of le a d e rs h ip in the M ich igan S u p rem e C o u rt. A m ong o th e r

b e n e fits of such r e s e a r c h , sa y s U lm e r , i s th a t " , . . fo r p ra c tic in g

la w y e rs , in fo rm a tio n about th e p o w er o r in fluence s tru c tu r e of a c o lle g ia l

c o u r t is of som e v a lu e in p re d ic tin g th e ju d ic ia l re sp o n s e to the fa c t

s tim u li p re s e n te d in p a r t ic u la r c a s e s . Such in fo rm a tio n a s i t e n te r s

in to the fo rm u la tio n of a p p e a ls (b r ie f s , a rg u m e n ts , e t c . ) , b e c o m e s a

c le a r p a r t of the rh e to r ic a l th e o ry of a p p e lla te ad v o cacy . In a m o re

m a th e m a tic a l ap p ro ach to sm a ll g roup study , S c h u b e rt h a s e x p lo red the

p o s s ib i l i t ie s of u s in g B loc A n a ly s is , G am e A n a ly s is , and S ca lo g ram

A n a ly s is . H is in i t ia l e f fo r ts hav e b e e n d ire c te d m o re to the e x p e r i­

m en ta tio n w ith m eth o d than to seek in g u se fu l c o n c lu s io n s . H o w ev er,

S ch u b e rt s a y s ,

O u r im m e d ia te c o n c e rn i s w ith the so c io -p sy c h o lo g ic a l d im en sio n of tine fo rm a l d e c is io n -m a k in g b e h a v io r of th is s m a ll , p o li t ic a l (in the p u b lic -p o lic y -c o n se q u e n c e s sen se) e li te g ro u p . O ur p r im a r y c o n c e rn is w ith th e m o tiv a tio n s w hich le a d in d iv id u a l m e m b e rs of th is sm a ll g ro u p to ch o o se , in th e i r co n jo in t voting b e h a v io r , to s e le c t c e r ta in a l te rn a t iv e s (i. e . , p r e f e r r e d o u tco m es) r a th e r th an o th e r s . In sh o r t , the fu n d am en ta l q u es tio n th a t we r a i s e i s not *what d e c is io n s h a s the S u p rem e C o u rt m a d e ? '; i t i s r a th e r "W hy (and to a l e s s e r

7 2 s . Sidney U lm e r , " L e a d e rs h ip in the M ich igan S u p rem e C o u r t ," J u d ic ia l D ec is io n -M ak in g , op . c i t . , pp . 13-28.

^ 7 3 lb id ., p . 14.

74o ien d o n A^ S ch u b e rt, Q u an tita tiv e A n a ly s is of J u d ic ia l B eh av io r, B u re a u of S ocia l and P o l i t ic a l R e s e a rc h , M ichigan S ta te U n iv e rs ity (G len­co e , I ll in o is : The F r e e P r e s s , 1959), pp . 77-376 .

337

how) d oes th e S u p rem e C o u rt m ak e the d e c is io n s th a t i td o e s ? ‘75

C le a r ly , one c o n c e rn e d w ith the rh e to r ic a l th e o ry of a p p e lla te d e c is io n ­

m aking i s c o n c e rn e d w ith the sam e q u e s tio n s . A s an ex am p le of the

re s u l ts of th is type of a n a ly s is , a study of the 1936 te r m of the U nited

S ta tes S u p rem e C o u rt f ro m the p e rs p e c tiv e of gam e th e o ry y ie ld s the

c o n c lu s io n ,

VHiether tlie ju s t ic e s . . . w ere p lay in g a gam e . . . , w ith pow er a s th e o b je c t, w e cannot sa y . B u t w e can say th a t th e ir a c tu a l b e h a v io r w as in ex cep tio n a lly c lo se c o rre sp o n d e n c e to the w ay th ey should h ave beh av ed if they h ad b een com peting in such a g a m e . To th e ex ten t th a t th e m o d el su g g e s ts i n t e r ­p re ta tio n s th a t add to o u r unde r s tan d in g of the C o u rt, and d ire c ts a tte n tio n to re la tio n s h ip s and d a ta th a t w ould n o t be p e rc e iv e d f ro m a n o th e r p e r s p e c t iv e , w e m ay be ju s t if ie d in conclud ing th a t gam e th e o ry h a s som eth ing w orthw hile to c o n trib u te to th e study of public law . 75

S u re ly if the ju s t ic e s a r e engaged in a p o w er s tru g g le w ith in

th e ir g ro u p , th en the degteee to w hich an a tto rn e y can in flu en c e th e ir

voting b e h a v io r th ro u g h p e rs u a s io n w ill b e lim ite d . On th e o th e r hand,

ap p e lla te p e r s u a s io n m a y tak e advan tage of such know ledge and u se i t to

fu r th e r a p a r t ic u la r end. In any c a s e , such in fo rm a tio n is re le v a n t to

rh e to r ic a l th e o ry and the v a lid ity of the ra t io n a l a s su m p tio n s .

A d d itio n a l in s ig h t in to a ssu m p tio n s of ju d ic ia l d e c is io n -m ak in g

com e f ro m e f fo r ts s p e c if ic a lly to develop fo rm u la s to p r e d ic t voting

b e h av io r . G e n e ra lly , such fo rm u la s invo lve quantify ing p a s t d ec is io n s

75ib id , - p . 11. 76j;b id ., p . 210.

338

of the c o u r t , a long w ith o th e r re le v a n t d a ta lyhich can be found. The

a ssu m p tio n of one sy s tem is th is : "M ost li t ig a tio n s itu a tio n s rev o lv e

a ro u n d le g is la t iv e o r ju d ic ia l ru le s of law th a t spec ify th a t c e r ta in in d iv i­

dual v a r ia b le s o r com binations of v a r ia b le s w ill le a d to c e r ta in ju d ic ia l

d e c is io n s , Such a fo rm u la , h o w ev er, a s s u m e s a c e r ta in ra tio n a l

co n s is ten cy in c o u r t b e h a v io r .

I t i s p o s s ib le to p r e d ic t how the c o u r t w ill go in a fu tu re c a se , . , f ro m a q u an tita tiv e a n a ly s is of bo th th e v a r ia b le s p r e s e n t in p a s t c a s e s and the d e c is io n s re a c h e d . T h is i s p o ss ib le p ro v id e d the c o u r t i s c o n s is te n t w ith the u n d erly in g p a t te rn i t h a s e s ta b lish e d fo r i t , , , and p ro v id e d th a t the p re s e n c e of th e re le v a n t f a c t-v a r ia b le s in the fu tu re c a s e is no t so su b je c t to d isp u te th a t one cannot know w hat f a c t - v a r ia b le s w ill be found p r e s e n t by the c o u rt,

A p ra c t ic a l ap p lica tio n of such an ap p ro ach h a s b een p ro v id e d by R eed C,

L aw lo r u s in g an IBM 7090 C om puter a t th e S tan fo rd C om putation C en te r

in P a lo A lto , C a lifo rn ia , The p ro g ra m in v o lv es s to rin g p re c e d e n ts

of the U, S» S uprem e C o u rt an.d p re d ic tin g a d e c is io n by fo u r d iffe re n t

m e th o d s. One m eth o d w ould s e t out a l l p re v io u s c a s e s in w hich a l l the

fa c ts of a p re v io u s c a se a r e p r e s e n t in the c a se to be p re d ic te d , no o th e r

^ ^ S tu a rt S . N ag el, "U sing S im ple C a lcu la tio n s to P r e d ic t Ju d ic ia l D e c is io n s , " The P r a c t ic a l L a w y e r, V ol. 7 (M arch , 1961), p , 68,

78i b i d , , p , 69.

^^R eed C , L a w lo r, u n p u b lish ed co m p u te r r e p o r t . T h is a n a ly s is w as p e r fo rm e d on the 7090 IBM co m p u te r a t th e S tan fo rd C om putation C en te r , P a lo A lto , C a lifo rn ia , The co m p u te r p ro g ra m th a t w as u sed w as p re v io u s ly developed and te s te d by L aw lo r on tiie IBM 7090 co m p u te r

■ a t W e s te rn D ata P ro c e s s in g C e n te r lo c a te d a t U, C ,L , A , E d g a r A , Jone%

339

fa c ts a r e p r e s e n t in the p rev io u s c a s e , and a t le a s t one ju s t ic e vo ted p ro

to e s ta b lis h a p ro -p re c e d e n t c a se ; an d a t le a s t one ju s tic e v o ted con to

e s ta b lis h a c o n -p re c e d e n t c a se . A seco n d m ethod c o m p a re s r e s u l ts

ob ta in ed in d e c is io n s m ad e p re v io u s ly on the sam e type of c a s e a s th a t

to be p re d ic te d . The th ird m ethod u s e s a log ic fo rm u la developed to

d e s c r ib e p a s t b e h a v io r of the c o u r t a s a w hole , and the fo u rth m ethod

u s e s a log ic fo rm u la developed fo r d e s c r ib in g the m a n n e r in w hich the

ind iv idual ju s t ic e s have vo ted w hen p re s e n te d w ith v a r io u s f a c t p a t te rn s .

Of the lo g ic -m a th e m a tic a l a p p ro a c h e s the w r i te r s a y s ,

I t is p o s s ib le th a t the r e s u l ts o b ta in ed by m eth o d s by [ s i c j th re e and fo u r w ill b e c o n tra d ic to ry . Only tim e w ill te l l how re l ia b le v a r io u s m e th o d s m ay b e . T hey can su cceed only if c o u r ts and in d iv id u a l ju s t ic e s fo llo w c o n s is te n t voting p a t te rn s and only if th e s e vo ting p a t te rn s c a n be d isc o v e re d and th en d e s c r ib e d in m a th e m a tic a l t e r m s . F o r ex am p le , i t can be shown th a t m u ltip le - ju d g e c o u r ts can be in c o n s is te n t even though e v e ry ju d g e who v o te s on th a t c o u r t i s a lw ays consistent.® ®

I t i s co n ce iv ab le , th e r e fo re , th a t such q u an tita tiv e a n a ly s is of ju d ic ia l

d ec is io n -m a k in g w ill add su b s tan tia l in fo rm a tio n co n cern in g th e q u estio n

of ra tio n a lity and c o n s is te n c y w ith w hich d e c is io n s a r e m ad e . A s th is

type of in fo rm a tio n is ob ta ined , the a n a ly s is of the rh e to r ic of a p p e lla te

advocacy w ill tak e on added so p h is tic a tio n . I t is a s su m e d , of c o u rse ,

th a t the p r e s e n t t r e n d is no t to su b s titu te c o m p u te rs fo r ju d g e s , a s one

P r o f e s s o r of L aw a t U, C, L .A . and C h a irm a n of the U; C, L , A , C o m m it­te e fo r In te rd is c ip lin a ry S tud ies of L aw and the A d m in is tra tio n of J u s t ic e , sp o n so re d fo r the u se of the f a c i l i t ie s a t W e s te rn D ata P ro c e s s in g C e n te r ,

®®Ibid,

340

w r i te r h a s p ro p o sed ,® ^ The c o n se n su s s e e m s to be th a t ab so lu te co n ­

s is te n c y and p re d ic ta b ili ty a r e u nw ise ; th a t in the f in a l a n a ly s is each

d ec is io n m u s t a r i s e f ro m the cho ice of a m an , and if th a t i s th e c a s e ,

the le g a l p ro c e s s w ill continue to invo lve r h e to r ic a l th e o ry .

® ^Paul C , B a rth o lo m ew , "T he S u p rem e C o u rt and M o d ern O b jec­tiv ity , " N ew Y ork S t a ^ J o u r n ^ V ol. 33 (Ju n e , 1961), pp . 157-164.

C H A PTE R VI

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

R h e to r ic a l th e o ry in A m e r ic a n leg a l p r a c t ic e h a s b een the fo cu s

of th is s tu d y . S p e c if ic a lly , i t h a s b e e n ask ed w h e th e r th e re i s an u n d e r ­

ly ing r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in A m e ric a n leg a l p r a c t ic e ; if so , w hat i s the

c h a r a c te r o f the th eo ry ; and , f in a lly , if such a th e o ry is to be found, i s

i t s a p p lic a tio n v a lid ?

U n q u estio n ab ly , th e re i s a rh e to r ic a l th e o ry a s su m e d in A m e ric a n

le g a l p r a c t ic e . The ap p lic a tio n of law s is founded upon a co ncep tion of a

ra tio n a l c a p a c ity in m an w hich can be app lied to h is d e c is io n s . The

d e c is io n -m a k in g p r o c e s s i s founded upon the p re s e n ta t io n of p ro o fs ,

w r itte n an d o r a l , f ro m a d v e r s a r y s to ju d g es . In th is r e s p e c t , th e sy s te m

and th e o ry h av e n o t changed f ro m th a t o r ig in a lly a r t ic u la te d by A r is to t le ,

A t i t s ro o t, the e s ta b lis h m e n t of so c ia l o r d e r th ro u g h the ru le of

law in v o lv e s a p ro b le m : by w h at fo rc e is th e law to b e u p h e ld ? If law is

b e liev e d to com e fro m su p e r-h u m a n s o u rc e s , god o r n a tu re , then ru le s

th a t a p p e a r to be i r r a t io n a l , w h im s ic a l, o r u n ju s t, c a n be a ttr ib u te d to

the in s c ru ta b i l i ty of the s u p e r-h u m a n fo rce b eh in d th e law . A s long a s

m an a c c e p ts th is fo rc e , th en he w ill be p a tie n t, a s w as Job* w ith th is

341

342

seem ing ly u n fa ir tre a tm e n t. The d ifficu lty co m es when i t i s m an , not

god, who i s re sp o n s ib le fo r the law . Then th e m o d ern -d ay Job is m oved

to in q u ire by w h at r ig h t, by w hose a u th o r ity , i s he m ade to su ffe r such

tre a tm e n t w hen o th e rs do no t. To a n sw e r th is q u estio n , the le g a l sy s tem

h a s developed a th e o ry of g o v ern m en t of law s ap p lied w ith r e a s o n , not

the ru le of m en ap p lied a t w ill. T h is sy s te m p ro c la im s th a t the law is

know able and p re d ic ta b le , and the sam e fo r a l l m en . The fo rc e beh ind

the law is R easo n and J u s t ic e ,

B u t if th is sy s te m is to do w hat i t c la im s , th e re m ay be no

d ec is io n s th a t a r e i r r a t io n a l , w h im sic a l, o r u n ju s t. To m e e t th is

re q u ire m e n t, the le g a l sy s te m h a s d ev elo p ed a com plex r h e to r ic a l s t r u c ­

tu re d es ig n ed to a s s u r e ra tio n a lity in the ap p lica tio n of law . In th e f i r s t

p la c e , the s o u rc e s of p ro o f in a le g a l c o n tro v e rs y a r e to com e fro m

w ith in the sy s te m i t s e l f - - s ta tu te s , p re c e d e n ts , e t c , , and th e re fo re a re

to develop a p e rm a n e n c e fo r eq u a l a p p lic a tio n to a l l m en. T he s o u rc e s

of p io o f in q u e s tio n s of fa c t a r e re g u la te d by an e lab o ra te sy s te m of ru le s

of a d m iss ib ili ty and c o u rt p ro c e d u re d e s ig n e d to a s s u r e the l i t ig a n ts th a t

a f a ir t r i a l w ill b e had th ro u g h the av o idance of n o n -ra tio n a l p ro o fs .

D uring the t r i a l , te s tim o n y w ill be ob ta in ed and am ple o p p o rtu n ity w ill

b e p ro v id e d fo r te s tin g i t s p ro b a tiv e v a lu e . The d ec is io n w ill u ltim a te ly

b e m ade e i th e r b y a ju d g e--w h o i s t ra in e d an d e ;q )erienced in the law and

w ill s e le c t only p ro p e r p ro o fs upon w hich to m ake a ra tio n a l d ec is io n ; o r

343

by a ju ry , w hich h a s b ee n g u ard ed fro m n o n -ra tio n a l s tim u la tio n b y the

ru le s and w ill ch eck i t s e l f by pooling th e d e c is io n -m a k in g p o w e rs of

s e v e ra l c i t iz e n s , and w hich can only d ecide q u es tio n s of fa c t, leav in g the

law to th e judge.

A d d itio n a lly , th e re a r e b u ilt in to the le g a l p ro c e s s o th e r ch eck s

and b a la n c e s d es ig n e d to p ro m o te ra tio n a lity in the d e c is io n , A ju d g e ,

if he f e e ls the s itu a tio n dem ands i t , m ay tak e the d e c is io n aw ay f ro m the

ju ry . The l i t ig a n ts , if th ey fe e l n o n -ra tio n a li ty h a s e n te re d in to the

d e c is io n , m ay tak e th e i r c a se b e fo re a c o u r t of a p p e a ls w hich o f fe r s the

in fo rm e d and e x p e r ie n c e d ju dgm en t of m o re th an one ju d g e , and th e r e

a r e s e v e ra l le v e ls of a p p e a l. The e x is te n c e of the a d v e r s a ry a rg u m e n t

a t a l l le v e ls i s d es ig n ed to hold th e in q u iry to c r i t ic a l a r e a s .

Y et, in the fa c e of th is r h e to r ic a l s t r u c tu r e , th o se who da ily

engage in i t s p r a c t ic e have grow n to v iew the p ro c e s s a s l e s s ra t io n a l

th an ex p ec ted . T he c h a r a c te r of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in le g a l p r a c t ic e a p p e a rs

bo th co m plex and c o n tro v e rs ia l . A t t im e s , le g a l p ra c t ic e r e q u ire s a

c o u n se lo r , a t o th e r s a n e g o tia to r , an in v e s tig a to r fo r in fo rm a tiv e c o m ­

m u n ica tio n , an in fo rm a tiv e sp e a k e r , an a rg u m e n ta tiv e s p e a k e r , a

p e rs u a s iv e sp e a k e r , an e ffec tiv e w r i te r in a l l th e se fo rm s , a t t im e s an

a tto rn e y m u s t engage in m ed ia tio n and co n c ilia tio n . T h e se ta s k s and

o th e r s involve th e a p p lic a tio n of rh e to r ic a l th e o ry . D epending upon the

in d iv id u a l o r school of thought te s tify in g , such th eo ry is v iew ed v a r io u s ly

344

a s involv ing m any ap p e a ls , ra tio n a l and n o n -ra tio n a l , o r a t the o th er

e x tre m e , a s no t a ra tio n a l p r o c e s s a t a l l . The a tto rn e y s u til iz e rh e to ­

r ic a l th e o r ie s desig n ed to ap p ea l to a n o n - ra tio n a l fa c u lty a s su m e d to

o p e ra te bo th in ju d g es a s w ell a s j u r i e s . The p ra c tic in g a tto rn e y s a re

c o n c e rn e d no t only w ith fa c ts , b u t w ith the a p p e a ra n c e of fa c ts and th e ir

p re s e n ta tio n . I t i s a s su m e d th a t the a t t r a c t iv e n e s s of the ev idence , in

the fo rm of v isu a l a id s , m o d e ls , c h a r t s , m ay txiake a d iffe re n c e in the

w eig h t they have on the d e c is io n ; a n o n - ra tio n a l a ssu m p tio n . The a t to r ­

ney i s co n ce rn ed not only w ith w hat a w itn e ss s a y s , b u t how he say s i t - -

h is m a n n e r of speak ing , h is d r e s s , th e tone of h is v o ic e , fa c ia l

e x p re s s io n , e tc . The a tto rn e y a s s u m e s th a t such f a c to r s a s th e se w ill

co m m u n ica te co n c lu sio n s to a judge o r ju ry th a t m ig h t b e m iss in g fro m

the te s tim o n y i ts e lf . In th is w ay , the a tto rn e y avo ids th e lim ita tio n s fo r

ra tio n a li ty ex is tin g fo r spoken te s tim o n y . The a tto rn e y a s s u m e s th a t h is

own p e rfo rm a n c e w ill in fluence th e d e c is io n . To w hat ex ten t does he

fu lf il l the ex p ec ta tio n s of the judge o r ju ry of a ro le id e n tif ie d w ith a

s u c c e ss fu l la w y e r? N o n -ra tio n a l a s i t m ay b e , a t to rn e y s b e lie v e th a t

th e d e g re e to w hich they m e e t such ex p ec ta tio n s w ill b e in s tru m e n ta l in

ob ta in ing o r lo s in g a d ec is io n .

In te r m s of the c h eck s , th e fu n d am en ta l q u es tio n , "W hat is the

law , " c o n s titu te s a m a jo r b a r r i e r to an o v e r -a l l ra t io n a li ty in the leg a l

p r o c e s s . L e g a l p r a c t i t io n e r s h av e com e to b e liev e th a t " the law " is

345

w h a te v e r an e ffec tiv e p e r s u a d e r can b r in g a judge to say i t i s . A lthough

a judge m ay b e c o n sc ie n tio u s , h is u n d e rs tan d in g of w hat " the law " i s o r

w h at i s ju s t and sen s ib le w ill v a ry w ith the in flu en ces p e c u l ia r to h im .

T h a t i s , the av a ilab le m e a n s of p e rs u a s io n a r e no t b e in g e ffec tiv e ly

l im ite d to th o se of a ra t io n a l c h a r a c te r , say the p r a c t i t io n e r s . A s one

re p re s e n tin g the le g a l r e a l i s m school of thought m ig h t sa y , th e re m ay be

m u ch m ean ing and p re d ic ta b ili ty in the d e c is io n -m a k in g of the c o u r ts ,

b u t i t i s n o t c a u se d a s m u ch by th e e x te rn a l fo rc e s a s m u ch a s the con ­

s is te n c y w ith w hich th e sa m e n o n -lo g ic a l in flu en c es a c t on the decid ing

ju d g e . T h is b r in g s up a q u e s tio n a s to the c h a ra c te r of le g a l co n s is ten cy .

In v es tig a tio n of a tte m p ts a t v a lid a tio n of le g a l r h e to r ic y ie ld s

in c o n c lu s iv e r e s u l t s . T he fo rc e fu l and a r t ic u la te c r i t i c s advocating a

" r e a l i s t i c " th e o ry of law h av e done m uch to d isp e l the id e a l is t ic , a p r io r i ,

a u th o r ita r ia n is m h e ld o v e r f ro m the tim e of g o d -m ade law and n a tu ra l

law . B u t w hat the r e a l i s t s h av e le f t in p la c e of the s e c u r i ty of th e se

e a r ly co n cep ts is v ag u e . I t i s h e a lth y to u n d e rs ta n d th e w e a k n e sse s of

hum an p e rc e p tio n w hich e n te r in to te s tim o n y , say the c r i t i c s . I t i s

m ean in g fu l to r e a l iz e th a t th e w ay in w hichaa judge o r ju ry p e rc e iv e s the

ev id en ce w ill be in flu en ced by f a c to r s p e c u lia r to th e m and a p a r t f ro m

the ev idence i ts e lf . I t i s u se fu l to know th a t ju r ie s can m ak e th e ir

d e c is io n s w e ll b e fo re th e ev id en ce h a s b een fu lly p r e s e n te d and a rg u ed .

I t i s re v e a lin g to le a r n th a t a p p e lla te c o u r ts can r e s t t h e i r d ec is io n s upon

346

fo rc e s in te ra c tin g w ith in the m e m b e rsh ip of the c o u r t and a p a r t f ro m the

in d iv id u a l c a se a t h and . E v en m o re , the ap p e lla te c o u r t i s bound, n o t by

som e id en tif ia b le and la s tin g p r in c ip le of law , bu t r a th e r b y the b e lie f

in the se n se of one s id e o v e r a n o th e r w hich i s equally su p p o rted by le g a l

a u th o r ity . B ut the q u e s tio n i s w h e th e r o r no t the u ltim a te d ec is io n i s

founded upon a p p ro v ed and reck o n ab le g ro u n d s. The le g a l r e a l i s t s deny

th a t d e c is io n s r e s u l t f ro m the lo g ic a l ap p lica tio n of fa c ts to la s tin g le g a l

p r in c ip le s , and y e t th ey seem to have fa ith th a t le g a l d e c is io n s a re

s e n s ib le , c o n s is te n t, and p re d ic ta b le . They o ffer l i t t le ev id en ce w hich

d is c lo s e s the c h a r a c te r of " s e n s e " in th is con tex t, and w hat q u an tita tiv e

a tte m p ts th a t have b e e n m ade a r e h a p h a z a rd and, th u s f a r , in co n c lu siv e .

W hat im p lic a tio n s do such co n c lu s io n s have fo r s tu d e n ts of rh e to ­

r ic a l th e o ry ? A t th e v e ry le a s t , such conc lu sio n s re v e a l an o p era tin g

and in flu en tia l r h e to r ic a l s itu a tio n w hich h a s been e s s e n tia lly ig n o red by

rh e to r ic a l s c h o la rs and w hich is d e s p e ra te ly in n eed of study. P e rh a p s

m o re to the p o in t, th e p ro c e s s of a p p lic a tio n of law s p ro v id e s the s tu d en t

of rh e to r ic w ith an a d m ira b le o p p o rtu n ity to o b se rv e v a r io u s rh e to r ic a l

s itu a tio n s in o p e ra tio n and to exam ine and m e a s u re th em u n d e r re la tiv e ly

c o n tro lle d co n d itio n s . T h e re is u ti l i ty in such r e s e a r c h n o t only fo r i t s

ap p lica tio n to the le g a l p r o c e s s , b u t in the opportun ity to re v e a l g e n e ra l

rh e to r ic a l h y p o th e se s and d a ta a s w e ll.

347

S p ec ific a lly , the study of le g a l rh e to r ic r a i s e s s e r io u s q u es tio n

a s to th e v a lid ity of A r is to te lia n th e o r ie s of p ro o f a s a p p lied in s itu a tio n s

dem and ing c r i t ic a l d e c is io n s . In no o th e r r h e to r ic a l s itu a tio n i s th e re

such re g u la tio n of p ro o f in te r m s of the ex c lu sio n o r c o n tro l of n o n - r a t ­

io n a l e le m e n ts a s em bodied in e th o s and p a th o s . In no o th e r rh e to r ic a l

s itu a tio n h a s a s m uch a tten tio n b e e n g iven tc the fo cu sin g of the d e c is io n ­

m ak in g a c t on fa c t and re a so n a s em bodied in lo g o s . So fo cu sed , in f a c t ,

th a t le g a l education h a s developed the w id e sp rea d b e lie f th a t i t i s the

p ro p e r ap p lica tio n of le g a l p r in c ip le alone w hich i s the n e c e s s a ry eq u ip ­

m e n t of the ad v o ca te . And y e t, the te s tim o n y of th o se engaged in le g a l

advocacy a s w e ll a s th o se few s o c ia l s c ie n tis ts who h av e p e r fo rm e d

in v e s tig a tio n s th a t th e p re su m e d ra tio n a li ty of le g a l d ec is io n -m a k in g

m ay be a f ic tio n . If u n d er such c o n d itio n s , the le g a l p r o c e s s f a i ls to

b r in g fo r th , c o n s is te n tly and p re d ic ta b ly , ra tio n a l d e c is io n s , th en does

th is n o t q u es tio n the c ap ac ity fo r ra tio n a l d ec is io n -m a k in g in a l l rh e to ­

r ic a l s itu a tio n s?

A s y e t, the evidence does n o t w a r ra n t a co n c lu s io n to th is p ro b le m ,

and th e p re su m p tio n r e s t s w ith ra t io n a li ty . B ut f u r th e r in v es tig a tio n is

c a lle d fo r . The suggestion re s u l t in g f ro m C h ap ter V , fu r th e rm o re , i s

th a t such in v es tig a tio n should fo cu s on the c h a ra c te r of p ro o f o r m e ssa g e

w hich i s c o n s is te n tly the d e te rm in a n t of re le v a n t and in s tru m e n ta l e ffec ts

348

- - le g a l d e c is io n s . T h is in d ic a te s th a t r e s e a r c h a r is in g f ro m stu d en ts

of rh e to r ic o r co m m u n ica tio n w ould lik e ly b e m o re m ean ing fu l than th a t

o r ie n te d to p sy ch o lo g y o r p o li t ic a l s c ie n c e , b e c a u se the p ro b le m u n d e r

in v e s tig a tio n is a r h e to r ic a l p ro b le m . The d a ta su g g e s ts , a lso , th a t

such r e s e a r c h m u s t in c lu d e the b e h a v io ra l sc ie n c e p e rsp e c tiv e .

W hat sp ec ific q u e s tio n s m ig h t be in v e s tig a te d ? In the f i r s t p la c e ,

the key q u es tio n i s , a s s ta te d b e fo re , w hat m e s s a g e s a c tu a lly do ten d to

d e te rm in e in s tru m e n ta l e f fe c ts ? I s th e o v e ra l l s t r u c tu r e of the t r i a l of

f a c t -que s tio n s w e ll d e s ig n e d to c o n tro l co m m u n ica tio n to in su re th a t

a d m iss ib le fa c ts c o n s titu te th e p re d o m in a n t d e te rm in in g m e s s a g e s ? To

w hat ex ten t, th en , do es the ju r y r e s t i t s d e c is io n on p r e f e r r e d m e s s a g e s ?

O r c o n v e rse ly , to w hat ex te n t do m e s s a g e s o th e r th an the p r e f e r r e d on es

d e te rm in e the d e c is io n ? To w hat ex ten t i s th e judge m o re im m une to

i r r e le v a n t m e s s a g e s th an i s the lay m an ? D oes a ju ry a c tu a lly c o m p re ­

h end the ju d g e ’s in s tru c t io n s a s to law ? D oes a ju ry , a ssu m in g such

c o m p reh en sio n , a c tu a lly d ec id e the q u e s tio n s of f a c t f i r s t and th en f i t

th o se d e c is io n s to th e law a s u n d e rs to o d ? D oes the ju d g e 's m a n n e r and

m eth o d in p re se n tin g in s tru c t io n s c o n s titu te a d e te rm in in g m e ss a g e w ith

r e g a rd to the j u r y ’s d e c is io n ? To w hat ex ten t do es the d r e s s , in fle c tio n ,

fa c ia l eziqpression, e tc , of the w itn e ss in flu en ce the d e g re e to w hich he

in flu en c es the d e c is io n ? In th e face of d ire c t ly co n flic tin g te s tim o n y .

349

w hat f a c to r s m o s t f re q u e n tly ten d to cau se the ju ry o r judge to b e lie v e

one w itn e s s r a th e r th an a n o th e r?

In te r m s of th e w o rk of the ad v o ca te , the follow ing q u es tio n s

m ig h t be a sk ed . W hat i s the ro le of the opening s ta te m e n t of f a c ts ? Can

the c h o ic e , a r ra n g e m e n t, and p re se n ta tio n of fa c ts fix a d e c is io n in the

m in d of ju r o r s a t the o u ts e t of the t r i a l ? I s th e re a c o n s is te n t in c re a s e d

s tre n g th in fav o r of th e f i r s t s p e a k e r? To w hat ex ten t can c r o s s - e x a m i­

n a tio n c au se the ju d g e o r ju ry to d isb e liev e te s tim o n y ? W hat i s the e ffec t

of le g a l a rg u m e n t? To w hat ex ten t d o es a rg u m e n t tend to f ix b e lie f o r

change e s ta b lis h e d b e l ie f s ? W hat a s p e c ts of le g a l a rg u m e n t a r e m o s t

e ffec tiv e in in flu en c in g b e lie f? To w hat ex ten t does the p e rs o n a li ty of

th e ad v o ca te and th e m a n n e r of h is b e h av io r in fluence the d e c is io n ?

In te r m s of the sy s te m i ts e lf , th e se q u es tio n s m ig h t b e a sk ed .

How e ffec tiv e a r e the ru le s of ev idence in r e s t r ic t in g p ro o f to the m o s t

r a t io n a l? Is th e re a r e la t io n b e tw een the ap p lica tio n of r u le s of ev idence

and th e ra t io n a li ty of th e d e c is io n ? How r e a l i s t ic is the b e lie f th a t ju r ie s

a r e re p re s e n ta t iv e g ro u p s? To w hat ex ten t d o es the s e le c tio n of ju r o r s

by a d v o ca te s in flu en ce the u ltim a te d e c is io n (would the re je c te d ju r o r s

r e n d e r a s ig n if ic a n tly l e s s ra tio n a l d e c is io n ? )? Is th e re a d iffe re n c e

b e tw een ju ry d e c is io n s and judge d e c is io n s , and if so , w hat is th e c h a ra c te r

of the d iffe re n c e ? To w hat ex ten t do es the p e rso n a lity and so c io -e co n o m ic

b ack g ro u n d of the a c c u se d , p la in tiff , o r defendan t in fluence the u ltim a te

350

d e c is io n . A t w hat p o in t in the t r i a l d oes the ju ry f in a lly m ake i t s d e c i­

s io n ? A t w hat p o in t in the t r i a l does the judge f in a lly m ak e h is d e c is io n ?

I s th e re a re la t io n b e tw een th e se two p o in ts?

On the o th e r h an d , i t m ig h t u ltim a te ly be a sk ed w hat m o d ifica tio n s

in the le g a l sy s te m m ig h t b e m ade to in c re a s e the ra tio n a lity of d e c is io n s?

A nd ju s t a s m ean in g fu l, a re -e x a m in a tio n of w hat i s m e an t by " ra tio n a l

d e c is io n s" m ig h t be u se fu l. C e r ta in ly , in the a r e a of ap p e lla te d e c is io n s

th e re h a s b een re a d ju s tm e n t in the d e s ir e d goal. T h e re i s le s s ta lk of

finding T ru th and J u s t ic e and m o re ta lk abou t m ak ing sen s ib le d e c is io n s .

The q u es tio n , th en , m ig h t be w hat a r e the c r i t e r i a of a s e n s ib le d ec is io n ?

W ith in c re a s e d e f fo r ts in the te s tin g of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry in the

le g a l p r o c e s s , g r e a te r u n d e rs tan d in g of c r i t ic a l d e c is io n -m a k in g in

g e n e ra l is lik e ly to co m e . The p r e s e n t study h a s sought to expose the

c h a ra c te r of r h e to r ic a l th e o ry of c r i t ic a l d e c is io n -m a k in g in A m e ric a n

le g a l p ra c t ic e and to p ro v id e the b a s is fo r ad d itio n a l r e s e a r c h in th is

g e n e ra l a r e a of rh e to r ic .

BIBLIOGRAPHY

351

BIBLIOGRAPHY

B ooks

B aldw in , C h a r le s S e a r s . M ed iev a l R h e to r ic and P o e tic . G lo u c e s te r: P e te r S m ith , 1959.

B e re ls o n , B e rn a rd and Jan o w itz , M o rr is (ed s. ). R ea d e r in P u b lic O pinion and C om m u n ica tio n . R ev ise d ed . G lencoe, I llin o is :F r e e P r e s s , 1953.

B e u te l, F r e d e r ic k K, Some P o te n t ia l i t ie s of F isp e rim e n ta l J u r is p ru d e n c e a s a N ew B ra n c h of S o c ia l S c ien ce . L inco ln : U n iver s ity of N e b ra sk a P r e s s , 1957.

B row n , E liz a b e th C a s p a r . L e g a l E d u c a tio n a t M ich igan 1859-1959.Ann A rb o r: T he U n iv e rs ity of M ichigan L aw School, 1959.

B u r t t , H a ro ld E r n e s t , L e g a l P sy c h o lo g y . New Y ork: P r e n tic e -H a l l , I n c . , 1940.

B u tle r , B en jam in e F„ P la n fo r th e O rg a n iza tio n of a L aw F a c u lty in the U n iv e rs ity of the C ity of N ew Y o rk . F i r s t p u b lish ed in 1835 and re -p u b lis h e d •'vith a fo re w a rd by R u s se ll D . N ile s and an in t r o ­duction by J u liu s J . M ark e . N ew Y ork: L aw C en te r F o undation , 1956.

C ap lan , H a r ry ( tr a n s . ). C ic e ro , Ad H eren n iu m . C am b rid g e : H a rv a rd U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1954.

C ard o zo , B en jam in N ath an . The N a tu re of the Ju d ic ia l P r o c e s s . New H aven; Y ale U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1921.

The C en ten n ia l H is to ry of th e H a rv a rd L aw School, 1817-1917. C am ­b r id g e : The H a rv a rd L aw S chool A sso c ia tio n , 1918.

352

353

C la rk , C h a r le s E , H andbook of the L aw of Code P leading» 2d, ed ,S t, P a u l , M in n eso ta : W est P u b lish in g C o , , 1947,

C ohen, M o rr is R ap h a e l, R ea so n and L aw , G lencoe , I llin o is : T he F r e e P r e s s , 1950,

C o o p er, L a n e , T he R h e to r ic of A r is to t le , New Y ork : A ppleton - C e n tu ry - O ro f ts , I n c , , 1932,

C o rn e liu s , A s h e r L , T he C ro ss -E x a m in a tio n of W itn e sse s . In d ian ap o lis : The B o b b s -M e r r i l l C om pany P u b l is h e r s , 1929,

C uU inan, E u s ta c e , P r e p a ra t io n fo r T r ia l of C iv il A c tio n s . P h ila d e lp h ia : A m e ric a n L aw In s t i tu te , C o m m ittee on C ontinuing L e g a l E d u ca tio n and the A m e r ic a n B a r A sso c ia tio n , 1951,

D onovan, Jo se p h W, M o d ern J u ry T r ia l s , New Y ork: G, A , Je n n in g s C o ,, I n c , , 1927,

F ra n k , J e ro m e , L aw and the M odern M ind, New Y ork: C o w ard - M cC ann, 1949.

G oebel, J r . , J u liu s and the S taff of the F oundation fo r R e s e a rc h in L e g a l H is to ry , A H is to ry of the L aw School of C olum bia U n iv e rs ity , M orn ing s id e H e ig h ts , New Y ork : C olum bia U n iv e rs ity P r e s s ,1955,

G ray , G ile s W ilke son (com p, ), Index to th e Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l o f Speech V o lum es I to XL 1915-1954, D ubuque, Iow a: W m , C, B row n Com pany P u b l i s h e r s , 1956,

H am lin , P a u l M, L e g a l E d u c a tio n in C olon ia l New Y o rk , New Y ork :New Y o rk U n iv e rs ity L aw Q u a r te r ly R eview , 1939,

H ard w ick e , H e n ry , T he A r t of W inning C a se s o r M odern A dvocacy , A P r a c t ic a l T r e a t i s e on P re p a ra t io n fo r T r ia l , and the C onduct of C a se s in C o u rt, 2d, ed , A lbany , New Y ork: B an k s & C om pany , 1920,

H arn o , A lb e r t J , L e g a l E d u ca tio n in the U nited S ta te s , San F ra n c is c o : B an c ro ft-W h itn ey C o , , 1953,

H a r t , J r . , H en ry M , and S ack s , A lb e r t M , The L e g a l P r o c e s s : B a s ic P ro b le m s in th e M aking and A p p lica tio n of Law , C am b rid g e : T e n ta tiv e E d itio n , 1958,

354

H elm bo ld , W, C, ( tr a n s . ), P la tons G o rg ia s . New Y ork; The L ib e ra l A r ts P r e s s , 1952,

H elm b o ld , W, C, and R ab inow itz , W. G. ( tr a n s . ) . P la to * s P h a e d ru s . New Y ork: T he L ib e ra l A r ts P r e s s , 1956.

H ick am , H u b e rt, and S can lon , T hom as M. P re p a ra t io n fo r T r ia l .P h ila d e lp h ia : J o in t C om m ittee on C ontinuing L eg a l E d u ca tio n of th e A m e ric a n Law In s titu te and the A m e ric a n B a r A sso c ia tio n , 1963.

K a rle n , B e lm a r . A p p e lla te C o u rts in the U nited S ta te s and E ng land .New Y ork: N ew Y ork U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1963.

K eeton , G eorge W. H a r r i s 's H in ts on A dvocacy. London: S tevens &S ons, L im ite d , 1943,

K now er, F ra n k lin H. (C om p. ). Table of C on ten ts of The Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of S peech 1915-1956, Speech M onographs 1934-1956, an d The Speech T e a c h e r , 1952-1956 w ith a R ev ised Index C om ­p ile d th ro u g h 1956. Speech A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a , 1957,

L a n g e r , Susanne K. P h ilo so p h y in a New K ey. 2d ed . New Y ork:N ew A m e ric a n L ib r a r y of W orld L i te r a tu r e , I n c . , 1948,

L i t t le , C h a r le s E d g a r ( tr a n s . and ed . ). Q u in tilian the School M a s te r , T he In s titu tio n O ra to r ia of M arcu s F a b iu s Q u in tilin au s . N a sh ­v i l le , T e n n e sse e : fo r G eorge P eabody C o llege fo r T e a c h e rs , 1951.

L lew e lly n , K a r l N . T he Com m on Law T ra d itio n . B oston: L it t le ,B row n and C om pany, I960.

L o r r y , W ilfo rd R . A C iv il A ctio n — The T r ia l . P h ilad e lp h ia : A m e ric a n L aw In s titu te an d the A m eric an B a r A s so c ia tio n , 1959*

M cC arth y , D w ight C . P sy ch o lo g y and the L aw . Englew ood C liffs ,N . J . : P r e n tic e -H a l l , I960.

M unkm an, John H, T he T echnique of A dvocacy . London: S tevens &Sons L im ite d , 1951.

M u n s te rb e rg , Hugo, On th e W itness Stand. New Y ork: C la rk B o a rd m a n C o . , L td . , 1923.

355

N ich o ls , M a rie H ochm uth, R h e to ric and C r i t ic is m , B aton Rouge: L o u is ian a U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1963,

N iz e r , L o u is , My L ife in C o u rt. New Y ork: P y ra m id B o o k s, 1963,

R eed , A lfred Z a n tz in g e r , P re s e n t-D a y Law Schools in the U nited S ta tes and C anada. New Y ork: C arn eg ie F oundation fo r th e A dvance­m en t of T each in g , 1928,

R ev iew of L eg a l E d u ca tio n in the U nited S ta te s and C anadafo r the Y e a r 1929, New Y ork: C arn eg ie F oundation fo r the A d v ancem en t of T each in g , 1930,

R eed , John C, Conduct of L a w su its , B oston : L it t le , B row n , and C om ­pany , 1912,

R obbins, A lex an d e r H, A T re a t is e on A m e ric a n A dvocacy , St, L ouis: C e n tra l L aw Jo u rn a l C om pany, 1913,

R o b e r ts , W, R h y s, G reek R h e to ric and L i te r a r y C r i t ic is m , New York: L o n g m an s , G reen and Co, , 1928,

R obinson, E d w a rd S tevens, Law and the L a w y e rs , New Y ork: The M acm illan C om pany, 1937,

R obinson, W illiam* C, F o re n s ic O ra to ry A M anual fo r A d v o ca tes , B oston : L i t t le , B row n and Com pany, 1893,

S andford , W illiam P h ill ip s , E n g lish T h e o rie s of P u b lic A d d re s s , 1530- 1828, C olum bus, Ohio: H a ro ld L , H e d ric k , 1938,

S chubert, G lendon A , (ed, ), Ju d ic ia l D ecis io n -M ak in g , In te rn a tio n a l Y earbook of P o li t ic a l B eh av io r R e s e a rc h , V ol. 4, New Y ork; The F r e e P r e s s of G lencoe, 1963,

, Q ucintitative A n a ly s is of Ju d ic ia l B eh a v io r, B u re a u of Socialand P o l i t ic a l R e se a rc h , M ichigan S tate U n iv e rs ity , G lencoe: The F r e e P r e s s , 1959,

S co tt, H enry W, The E volu tion of Law , New Y ork; The B o rd en P r e s s P u b lish in g Co, , 1908,

S m ith , P h ilip A n s tie , A H is to ry of E d u ca tio n fo r the E n g lish B a r; w ith S uggestions a s to S ub jec ts and M ethods of Study, London: B u tte rw o r th s , 1860,

356

S tew ard , W m, S co tt, S tew art on T r ia l S tra te g y , P r a c t ic a l S uggestions to the Young L aw y er on How to O btain and H old C lie n ts , How to P r e p a r e an d T ry L a w su its , C hicago: The F lo o d C om pany,1940,

S try k e r , L loyd P a u l , The A r t of A dvocacy , New Y ork : Sim on and S c h u s te r , 1954,

T hons sen , L e s te r . S e lec ted R ead ings in R h e to ric and P u b lic Speaking,New Y ork : T he H, W, W ilson C om pany, 1942,

T hons sen , L e s te r and B a ird , A , C ra ig , Speech C r i t ic is m , New Y ork:The R onald P r e s s C om pany, 1948,

T hons sen , L e s te r , F a th e r son, E liz a b e th , and T hons se n , D o ro th ea (C om p,), B ib lio g rap h y of Speech E d u c a tio n , New Y ork: The H , W, W ilson C om pany, 1939,

T hons sen , L e s te r , R obb, M ary M a rg a re t , and T hons sen , D o ro th ea(Com p), B ib lio g rap h y of Speech E d u ca tio n S u p p lem en t: 1939-1948, New Y ork : The H , W, W ilson C om pany, 1950,

W allace , K a r l R , (ed , ), H is to ry of S peech E d u ca tio n in A m e r ic a , P r e ­p a re d u n d e r th e a u sp ic e s of the Speech A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a ,New Y ork : A p p le tc n -C e n tu ry -C ro f ts , I n c , , 1954,

W a rre n , C h a r le s , H is to ry of the H a rv a rd Law School and of E a r ly L eg a l C ond itions, New Y ork: L ew is P u b lish in g C om pany, 1908,

W atson, J , S, (ed, ) , C ice ro on O ra to ry and O ra to rs ; w ith H is L e t te r s to Q u in tus and B ru tu s , London; H e n ry G, B ohn, 1855,

W eav er, R ic h a rd M , The E th ic s of R h e to r ic , C hicago: H en ry R eg n ery C om pany, 1953,

W eüiofen, H en ry , L e g a l W riting S ty le . St, P a u l , M in n eso ta : W est P u b lish in g C o , , 1961,

W ellm an , F r a n c is L , The A r t of C ro s s -E x a m in a tio n , New Y ork: M acm illan C o , , 1923,

_, D ay in C o u rt o r The Subtle A r ts of G re a t A d v o ca te s , NewY ork; The M acm illan C o ., 1914.

, S u c ce ss in C o u rt. New Y ork : The M acm illan C o , , 1941,

357

W ien e r, F r e d e r ic k B e rn a y s . B rie fin g and A rgu ing F e d e ra l A p p ea ls . W ashington , D, C» ; BNA In c o rp o ra te d , 1961.

W ig m o re , John H en ry . T he S cience of J u d ic ia l P ro o f , 3d. ed . B oston: L i t t le , B row n, an d C om pany, 1937.

A r t ic le s and P e r io d ic a ls

A dlew , E . "The D ia le c tic of A dvocacy , " B o sto n U n iv e rs ity L aw R eview , XXXVI, No. 4 (F a ll , 1956), 579-586 .

A ld r id g e , H e n ri M , "A d v o ca cy --A D eclin ing A r t? " The A lab am a L a w y e r, V ol. 20, No. 4 (O ctober, 1959), 388-395.

B arth o lo m ew , P a u l C. "T h e S uprem e C o u rt and M odern O b jec tiv ity , "New Y ork S tate B a r Jo u rn a l , V ol. 33, No. 3 (June, 1961), 157-164,

B a te s , H en ry M. " A d d re ss of th e P r e s id e n t , " P ro c e e d in g s of theT h ir te e n th A nnual M eeting of th e A sso c ia tio n of A m e r ic a n Law S choo ls, V ol. 13 (1913), 29-42 .

B e a le , J r . , Jo sep h H . "T h e F i r s t Y ea r C u rr ic u lu m of L aw S c h o o ls ," P ro c e e d in g s of th e Second A nnual M eetin g of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S ch o o ls , V ol. 2 (1902), 4 2 -5 1 .

_________ . "The H is to ry of L e g a l E d u ca tio n , " in Law A C en tu ry ofP r o g r e s s 1835-1935, V ol. 1, New Y ork : New Y ork U n iv e rs ity P r e s s , 1937, 104-116.

B e v an , W illiam e t . a l. " J u ry B eh av io r a s a F unction of th e P r e s t ig e of the F o re m a n and th e N a tu re of h is L e a d e rs h ip , " J o u rn a l of P u b lic L aw , V ol. 7, No. 2 (F a ll, 1958), 419-449.

B la i r , P ax to n . "A p p ella te B r ie f s and A d vocacy , " F o rd h am L aw R eview , X V m , No. 1 (M arch , 1949), 3 0 -48 .

B r e e d e r , D ale W. "T he U n iv e rs ity of C hicago J u ry P r o je c t , " N e b ra sk a Law R eview , V ol. 38, No. 2 (1959), 744-760.

B ry a n , F r e d e r ic k V an P e l t . "T h e R ise an d F a l l of the A r t of A dvocacy , " Chitty*s L aw J o u rn a l , V o l. 7, N o. 1 (1957), 13-17.

358

B ry a n t, D onald C. "R h e to ric ; I ts F u n c tio n s and I ts Scope, " TheQ u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of S peech , XXXIX, No, 4 (D ecem b er, 1953), 401-424 .

C a rso n , R alph M, "C onduct of the A ppeal—A L a w y e r 's V iew , " inA p p ea ls . P h ila d e lp h ia : A m eric an L aw In s titu te (O c to b er, 1954), 4 8 -9 5 .

C ohen, F e l ix S. " F ie ld T h eo ry and Ju d ic ia l L o g ic , " The Y ale L aw Jo u rn a l , V ol. 59, No. 2 (Jan u a ry , 1950), 238-272.

C o n s ta n s , H. P h ilip and D ickey, D a lla s C. "T he C o n tem p o ra ry R h e to ric of the L a w ," The S ou thern Speech J o u rn a l, XIX, No. 4 (M ay, 1954), 277-282 .

D av is , John W. "The A rg u m en t of an A ppeal, " in A p p ea ls . P h i la d e l­ph ia : A m e ric a n Law In s titu te (O cto b er, 1954), 90-108.

D o re , E d w ard S. "E x p re s s in g the Idea; The E s s e n tia ls of O ra l and W ritten A rg u m e n t, " F o rd h am Law R ev iew , XXIII, No. 3, (D ecem b er, 1954), 229-242.

F lo r a , C laud B . "E ffec tiv e P re s e n ta tio n of th e L aw , " K an sas C ity Law R eview , IV, No. 6 (A p ril, 1936), 86 -88 .

G e rb e r t , K a rl. "T he P sy ch o lo g y of E x p re s s io n and the T echn ique ofC r im in a l In te r ro g a tio n , " J o u rn a l of P sy ch o lo g y and P s y c h o th e r ­apy , V ol. 2 (1954), 85-98 .

G ooch, J . A . "S hall A dvocacy V anish? " W ashington Law R ev iew and S ta te B a r J o u rn a l , Vol 31, No. 4 (W inter^ 1956), 358-367 .

G ro sm an , B r ia n A . "T e s tin g W itn ess R e lia b ili ty , " The C r im in a l Law Q u a r te r ly , V ol, 5, No, 3 (N ovem ber, 1962) 318-327.

H aigh t, G eorge I . "T h e A dvocate in C o u rts of R e v ie w ," W isco n sin Law R eview , V ol. 1940, No. 3 (May, 1940), 327-334.

H arno ,. A lb e r t J . "S e p a ra te S ta tem en t in R e p o rt of C o m m ittee on A im s and O b jec tiv es of L e g a l E d u ca tio n , " H andbook of the A sso c ia tio n of A m eric an L aw S chools, V ol. 41 (1943), 125-147,

359

H a s tin g s , W illiam G. " P ra c t ic e C o u r ts , " P ro c e e d in g s of the T w elfth A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls,V ol. 12 (1912), 90-97 .

J a c k so n , R o b e r t H. "A dvocacy b e fo re the S uprem e C ourt: S uggestions fo r E ffec tiv e C ase P r e s e n ta t io n s ," A m e ric a n B a r A sso c ia tio n J o u rn a l , V ol. 37 (N ovem ber, 1951), 801-804 .

K now er, F ra n k lin H . (co m p .) . "G rad u a te T h e se s A n Index of G rad u a te W ork in Speech , " Speech M onographs (1935-1962}^

L lev /e lly n , K a r l N. "T he M odern A pproach to C o u n se llin g and A dvocacy - -E s p e c ia l ly in C o m m e rc ia l T r a n s a c t io n s ," C olum bia L aw R ev iew , XLVI, N o. 2 (M arch , 1946), 167-195.

M acm illan , L o rd . "Som e O b se rv a tio n s on the A r t of A dvocacy , " The C anad ian B a r R eview , XIII, N o. 1 (Ja n u a ry , 1935), 2 2 -3 0 .

M cC lain , E m lin . "A d d re ss of the P r e s id e n t ," P ro c e e d in g s of the Second A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 2 (1902), 33-41 .

M cD onald , W illiam C. "O ra l A rg u m en t, " T ex as B a r J o u rn a l , XVI,No. 4 (A pril 22, 1944), 209-210 .

M cK eon, R ic h a rd . "R h e to ric in the M iddle A g e s ," in C r i t ic s and C r i ­t ic is m A n cien t and M odern , ed . R . S. C ran e e t. al» Chicago: T he U n iv e rs ity of C hicago P r e s s , 1952, 260-296 .

M ille r , A lb e r t H. "A L a w y e r’s T re a tm e n t of h is C lien t, " A m e ric a nB a r A sso c ia tio n Jo u rn a l, V ol. 13, No. 1 (Ja n u a ry , 1927, 30-33 .

M ille r , G eorge John# "In tro d u c tio n to O ra l A rg u m en t of an A p p eal, " F lo r id a Law J o u rn a l, XXV, No. 6 (June, 1951), 219-222 .

Nagelj, S tu a r t S. "U sing S im ple C a lcu la tio n s to P r e d ic t J u d ic ia lD e c is io n s , " The P r a c t ic a l L a w y e r, V ol. 7 , N o. 3 (M arch , 1961), 6 8 -7 4 .

O liphan t, H e rm a n . "A C o u rse in B r ie f M aking and L e g a l A rg u m en t, " H andbook of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw Schools and P r o ­ceed in g s of the S ix teen th A nnual M eeting , V o l. 16 (1916),156-159.

360

O sb o rn , A lb e r t S, "A C ase Book on Thought and R easo n in g , " A m e ric a n L aw School R ev iew , V ol. 5, No, 9 (M ay, 1925), 534-538,

R edm ount, R o b e r t S, "A P a n to sc o p ic V iew of L aw and P sy ch o lo g y , " Jo u rn a l of L e g a l E d u ca tio n , Vol, 10, No, 4 (1958), 436-451 ,

_________ , "P sy c h o lo g ic a l T e s ts fo r S e lec ting J u r o r s , " K an sas LawR eview , V ol, 5 (1957), 391-403,

R em y, C h a r le s F , " B r ie f and O ra l A rg u m en t on A p p ea l, " Ind ian a Law J o u rn a l , VI (1930), 16-28 (p ro ceed in g s of the th ir ty - fo u r th an n u al m e e tin g , Ind ian a S tate B a r A sso c ia tio n , B loom ington , In d ian a , Ju ly 10-11 , 1930),

R ic h a rd s , H a r ry S, " A d d re ss of the P re s id e n t , " P ro c e e d in g s of the F ifte e n th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S choo ls, V ol, 15 (1915), 60-76,

_________ , " E n tra n c e R e q u ire m e n ts fo r Law S ch o o ls, " P ro c e e d in g s ofthe F o u r th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S choo ls, V ol, 4 (1904), 29-39 .

R o b e r ts , W, R hys, " R h e to r ic a , " in The W orks of A r is to tle ed , W, D,R o ss , O xford: The C laren d o n P r e s s , 1946, V ol, X I,, 1354a-14aOb.

R o g e rs , W illiam P , " A d d re ss of the P r e s id e n t ," P ro c e e d in g s of the Seventh A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of Aum erican Law S choo ls, V ol, 7 (1907), 67-80,

R o ssm an , G eo rg e , "A p p ella te C o u rt A dvocacy: The Im p o rtan ce of O ra l A rg u m en t, " A m e ric a n B a r A sso c ia tio n J o u rn a l , V ol. 45 (Ju ly , 1959), 675-676 ,

R u tled g e , W iley, "T he A p p ella te B r ie f , " The J o u rn a l of the B a rA sso c ia tio n of ttie D is t r ic t of C olum bia, IX , No, 4 (A p ril, 1942), 147-163,

S hien tag , B e rn a rd L , "T he T r ia l of a C iv il J u ry A ction in N ew Y o rk , " U nited S ta te s L aw R ev iew , LXIX, N o, 4 (A p ril, 1935), 183-214.

"Should A dvocacy be R e s tr ic te d to E x p e r ts , " Jo u rn a l of the A m e ric a n Ju d ic a tu re S o c ie ty , V ol, 19, No, 3 (O c to b er, 1935), 85-89 .

361

Sim on, V isco u n t, "T he V ocation of An A dvocate , " The C an ad ian B a r R ev iew , XXV, No, 2 (F e b ru a ry , 1947), 153-167,

S lo sso n , L e o n a rd B , "The N eed fo r T ra in in g in A dvocacy , " J o u rn a lof th e A m e ric a n Ju d ic a tu re S o c ie ty , V ol. 16, N o. 1 (June, 1932), 8 3 -8 7 .

S m ith , B ro m le y , " C o ra x and P ro b a b il i ty , " The Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of Speech E d u c a tio n , VII (F e b ru a ry , 1921), 13-42.

S m ith , R alph . "T he T each ing of P u b lic Speaking in L aw S choo ls, " The Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of S peech , XI (F e b ru a ry , 1925), 54-57 .

S tacy , W alte r P a r k e r . "The L a w y e r, H is C lien t and h is A d v e rsa ry , "The N o rth C a ro lin a L aw R ev iew , V ol. 4 , No. 1 (F e b ru a ry ,1926), 2 0 -23 .

S te in b e rg , H a r r i s B . "The P r a c t i t io n e r SpeaJcs: W itness P e rfo rm a n c e a s Seen by a T r ia l A tto rn e y , " J o u rn a l of S ocia l I s s u e s , XIII,No. 2 (1957), 30-31 .

S tone, H a r la n F . "T he F u n c tio n of the A m e ric a n U n iv e rs ity Law School, " P ro c e e d in g s of the E lev e n th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol. 11 (1911), 59-61 .

S tro n g , F ra n k R . "A New C u rr ic u lu m fo r the C ollege of L aw of TheOhio S ta te U n iv e r s i ty ," Ohio S ta te Law J o u rn a l, V ol. 11, No. 1 (W in te r, 1950), 4 4 -5 6 .

S tro th e r , D av id B . " P e rs u a s io n in A m e ric a n L eg a l P r o c e d u re , " W este rn Speech (F a ll , 1961), 231-236 .

S u n d erlan d , E d so n R . "The A r t of L e g a l P r a c t ic e ," M ich ig an A lum nus, V ol. 18 (1912), 252-260 .

_________ . "T he P r a c t ic e C o u r t ," M ich igan A lum nus, V ol. 9 (1903),295 -299 .

. "T each in g P r a c t ic e , " P ro c e e d in g s of the T h ir te e n th Annual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S ch o o ls , V ol. 13 (1913), 4 7 -4 8 .

T hom pson , G. K. " O ra l A rg u m en ts in th e S uprem e C o u rt of Iow a, " Iowa Law R ev iew , V ol. 38, No. 3 (S pring , 1953), 392-409 .

362

T hom pson , Wayne N. and In sa la ta , S, John , "C om m unica tion fro mA tto rn e y to C lien t, " The J o u rn a l of C om m unica tion , XIV, No, 1, (M arch . 1964), 2 2 -33 ,

T ow nes, Jo h n C, "O rg an iza tio n and O p era tio n of a Law School, " P r o - c eed in g s of the T en th A nnual M eeting of th e A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S ch o o ls , V ol, 10 (1910), 7 4 -7 5 ,

V a n d e rb ilt , A r th u r T . "A R e p o rt on P r e le g a l E d u ca tio n , " New Y ork U n iv e rs ity Law R ev iew , XXV, No. 2 (A p ril, 1950), 200-290,

W einste in , J a c k B , "T he L a w 's A ttem p t to O btain U seful T estim o n y , " T he J o u rn a l of S o c ia l I s s u e s , XIII, No, 2 (1957), 6 -11 ,

W h itm er, C a r ro l l A, "P sy ch o lo g y in Law and in C rim ino logy , " inP sy ch o lo g y in U se ed, J , S tanley G ray , New Y ork: A m erican B ook Com pany, 1951,

W ien er, F r e d e r ic k B , "O ra l A dvocacy, " H a rv a rd Law R eview , V ol, 62, N o, 1 (N ovem ber, 1948), 56-75,

W igm ore , John H , "M in o rity R ep o rt of the C o m m ittee on C u rr ic u lu m , " P ro c e e d in g s of the N ineteen th A nnual M eeting of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n L aw S choo ls, V ol, 19 (1921), 34-36,

W ill, T h o m as A, "L eg a l P ro b le m Solving, " T u lane Law R eview , XXXVI, N o, 2 (F e b ru a ry , 1962), 297-306,

W illiam s, D onald E , "G roup D iscu ss io n and A rg u m en ta tio n in L eg a l E d u ca tio n , " The Q u a r te r ly J o u rn a l of S peech , X U , No, 4 (D ecem b er, 1955), 397-402,

W illiam s, P a u l W, "T he P r a c t i t io n e r Speaks Out: W itness P e rfo rm a n c e a s V iew ed by a U , S, A tto rn ey , " Jo u rn a l of Social I s s u e s , XIII, No, 2 (1957), 34 -35 ,

W righ t, W a rre n E , " Ju d ic ia l R h e to ric : A F ie ld fo r R e se a rc h , " Speech M onographs, XXXI, No, 1 (M arch , 1964), 64-72,

M isce llan eo u s

Continuing L eg a l E d u ca tio n fo r P ro fe s s io n a l C om petence and R e sp o n s i­b ility» Jo in t C o m m ittee on Continuing L e g a l E d u ca tio n , The R e p o r t on the A rd e n H ouse C o n feren ce , D ec , 16-19, 1958,

363

F o th e rin g h am , W allace C. F u n c tio n s in P e r s u a s io n , (in p re s s ) .

F u l le r , Lion L . "W ork on the C u rr ic u lu m , " H a rv a rd L aw School B u lle tin . B u lle tin No. 2 (Ju ly , 1948), 1-10.

H andbook of the A sso c ia tio n of A m e ric a n Law S chools and P ro c e e d in g s of the A nnual M ee tin g s , V ol. 1-50 (1901-1952),

T he L aw Schools L ook A head , 1959 C onference on L e g a l E ducation .The Tw elfth A nnual S um m er In s titu te on L e g a l E d u ca tio n sp o n ­so re d by the U n iv e rs ity of M ichigan L aw S chool, June 15-18,1959.

L a w lo r , R eed. C. U npublished C om puter R ep o rt. S tan fo rd C om putation C e n te r , P a lo A lto , C a lifo rn ia .

R eed , A lfred Z a n tz in g e r. T ra in in g fo r the P u b lic P ro fe s s io n of the Law . B u lle tin N o, 15, New Y ork: C a rn e g ie F oundation fo r the A dvancem ent of T each ing , 1921.

S h e a re r , A lan K ent. "A C o u rse in L eg a l A dvocacy fo r P r e -L e g a l S tu ­d en ts . " D e p a rtm e n t of S peech, u n p ub lished M. A . th e s is . L aw rence : U n iv e rs ity of K an sas , 1955.

V a n d e rb ilt, A rth u r T . " F o re n s ic P e r s u a s io n ," The John RandolphT u ck er L e c tu re s , 1949-1952 (d e liv e re d b e fo re the School of L aw of W ashington an d L ee U n iv e rs ity ) . L ex in g to n , V irg in ia , 1952, 39-92.