Oil and Gas Fields DB+~ - OSTI.GOV

ResearchReport)

APEC-GEMEEDMherals and Energy Exploration and Development Expert Group

Oil and Gas Fields DB+~(http: /Japec.kigam.re.kr)

t@liEi?HBim%F!JiKorea Institute of Geology, Mining & Materials

1 DISCLAIMER

Portions of this document may be illegiblein electronic image products. Images areproduced from the best available originaldocument.

APEC-GEMEEDMkerals and Energy Exploration and Development Expert Group

Oil and Gas Fields DBY+(http: /{apec.kigam.re.kr)

Australia

Brunei Darussalam

Canada

Chile

the People’s Republic

Hong Kong

Indonesia

Japan

of China

the Republic of Korea

Malaysia

Mexico

New Zealand

Papua New Guinea

the Philippines

Singapore

Chinese Taipai

Thailand

the United State of America

ZuElin!iiiKorea IInstkute of Geology,

m%%Mining & Materisls

APEC-GEMEEDMinerals and Energy Exploration and Development Expert Group

Oil and Gas Fields Database(httpY/apec.kigam.re.kr)

*Young–In Kim, ** Jung-Kuy Ha.rJ

Abstract

As agreed by the Second Meeting of the Expert Group of

Minerals and Energy Exploration and Development in Seoul, Korea

“The Construction of Database on the Oil and Gas Fields in the

APEC Region” is now under way as a GEMEED database project for

1998. This project is supported by Korean government funds and the

cooperation of GEMEED colleagues and experts.

During this “year, we have constructed the home page menu

(topics) and added the data items on the oil and gas field, These

items include name of field, discovery year, depth, the number of

wells, average production(b/d), cumulative production, and API

gravity.

The web site shows the

APEC region is 47,201. The

economies are shown in the

total number of oil and gas fields in the

number

table.

World oil and gas statistics

consumption, and trade information

the users convenience.

of oil and gas fields by member

inch-ding reserves, production,

were added to the database for

i

The number of oil and gas fields in the APEC region

RMember Total

Economy Fields

Austmlia 115

Brunei7

Darussalem

Hchina

I23

Member

EconomyHong Kong

china

Indonesia

Japan

Korea

+

Total Member

Fields Economy

- Mexico

New195

Zealand

8 I PhilippinesI

=7==

Total

Fields

106

6

4

Malaysia

ii

1=Member Total

Economy FieldsChinese

5Taipei

Thailand 5

,

46,607USA

DOE pdf

T%rl

Aj ~ .....................................................................................................................

1-1

1-2

1-3

1-4

1-5

X123

2-1

2-2

2-3

2-4

2-5

2-6

GEMEED ...........................................................................................

7] S- ......................................................................................................

..................................................................................................................

APEC 7]% ........................................................................................................

APECQl

APECQl

APEC+

+4%%’?5 -wq..,,,,,,,...,....................................................................+341%4 a% .................................................................................Z&% ...................................................................................................

GEMEED ...........................................................................................................

7] Q .,,,...............................................................................................................

GEMEED +% Q% ........................................................................................

g2~ qq ............................................................................................................

DB +=& .......................................................................................................

$?% + =L-&lECOW) .......................................................................................

lz~q ~ +xD ...................................................................................................

Xl 3 % GEMEED L+lo] ~ MlO]& ..................................................................................

X11147]Q. ..................................,,,............................................................................

%] 2 %! ~q=~ Y=lOil and gas Fields DB ...<.,.,..,.,...,......................................

71 3 ~ ANMED q %?%%% DB ............................0..,.,.,,...,.................................

Al 4 % Oil and Gas Fields DB .....................................................................................

1

3

3

3

4

6

8

9

10

10

11

15

16

20

21

23

23

23

26

29

...111

%] 1 ~ +4 q 71-&@ DB ...................................................................................... 29

l-l 7] Q. ..................................................................................................................... 29

● Australia ...................................4..........................................................................

● Brunei Darussalem .............................................................................................

● Canada ....................................................................................................................

● Chile ........................................................................................................................

c the People’s Republic of China ......................................................................

● Indonesia ................................................................................................................

● Japan .......................................................................................................................

● the Republic of Korea .......................0...............................................................

c Malaysia .................................................................................................................

● Mexico ....................................................................................................................

● New Zealand .........................................................................................................

● Papua New Guinea ...........................................................................................

● Peru ........................#.........................................................................................!......

● the Philippines ......................................................................................................

“ Russia .....................................................................................................................

“ Chinese Taipei .................................................................................................!,,.

9 Thailand .................................................................................................................

s the United State of America ..........................................................................

● Vietnam ..................................................................................................................

29

31

33

35

36

37

39

40

42

44

46

48

49

51

52

53

54

55

57

1-2 95% 3%! ...................................................................................................... 58

31 2 ?4 q+ q 7} A%-7zll DB .....!.!..0..,.................................................................. 153

2-1 4 -i+ ...................................................................................................4................. 153

iv

................................................................................................................

...................................................................,...,.., .,.,$,.., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

................................................................................................................

7}, u~x$=~ ................................................................................................................

+, ‘Jti* ................................................................................................................

q. +ljl~ ................................................................................................................

X15’ JZ2% .................................................................................................................

● The Maintenance and Update of GEMEED’s WWW Database in Korea,

3rd Meeting APEC-GEMEED (8-12 May, 1998, Ottawa, Canada)

● APEC-GEMEED X13~} q Ql(8-12 May, 1998, Ottawa, Canada) Summary

Report

153

157

161

169

170

170

174

178

182

1-3-1 APEC %+ 7] #+!+ (1989)

1-3-2 Al& 4! ?i+H1992)

6

‘2-1 71 JL

10

2–2 GEMEED %% SL%lTerms of Reference)

11

APEC GEMEED Database Workshop

SUMMARY RECORD

Canberra, Australia, 9-11 September 1996

L At its inaugural meeting in Santiago, ChiIe in March 1996, the Group

of Experts on Minerals and Energy Exploration and Development (GEMEED)

accepted proposals from Australia and Chile to stage a Workshop to design

a comprehensive database to facilitate investment in minerals and energy

throughout the APEC region.

2. The Workshop was held in Canberra, Australia from 9-11 September

1996, hosted by the Bureau of Resource Sciences. It was attended by

representatives of Australia, Chile, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Papua New Guinea

and Chinese Taipei. Participants also attended from the Australian State of

Queensland and from Australian industry. A list of delegates is at

Attachment A.

3. Presentations were made on a variety of matters, including (in general

terms):

subjects which should be covered in the database

how to use the Internet to disseminate information

existing relevant databases in several member economies

the policy and legal framework for petroleum and minerals exploration

and development in two individual member economies technical issues in

data management.

4. Three proposals for future work were foreshadowed:

a cooperative study by GEMEED of mine safety measures and

pollution controI in the region(proposed by Japan)

a database on mining related experts and organizations in the APEC

region (offered to be undertaken by Korea), and possible joint feasibility

studies by GEMEED for mining investment in the APEC region (proposed

by Korea).

5. The agenda for the meeting and copies of the papers presented are

17

attached (Attachments B and C), together

Canadian Government listing information it

Database (Attachment b).

6, The Workshop accepted that:

it was important to ensure that data

with a copy of a letter fi-om the

could make available now for the

and documents were stored in a

format that would remain readable for a worthwhile time;

GEMEED would be constructing a database cataloging and linking

individual national databases and metadatabases,

responsible for managing its own data, GEMEED

providing a good ability to access information in these

with each economy

could add value by

databases;

because member economies differ widely in their telecommunications

capacities, it would be useful for those providing maps to offer ‘quick look’

maps as well as more detailed maps;

as GEMEED would need to construct the database over a prolonged

period, it should focus its early efforts on capturing basic exploration data

and information on the investment framework;

as an alternative to linking detailed hard data (such as gravity surveys

on particular areas) into the GEMEED database, member economies could at

least provide a contact to be approached for such information.

7. Japan informed the Workshop that the MN.fAJ (Metal Mining Agency

of Japan) has

occurrences and

database already

to other areas.

been developing a database of international rnineraI

would offer access to this to GEMEED at no cost, This

covered part of the APEC region and it wouId be expanded

8, The Workshop adopted the following

of the Database:

a. Lhdcages

Recommendation on development

The Database wdl consist of a series of linked fieIds, presented in

groups of reIated topics. The subjects wilI be the topics listed in Annex 1.

Content should not dupIicate but, through appropriate linkages, integrate

relevant parts of the existing database of the Energy Working Group.

18

Australia will design the GEMEED Database Home Page and “undertake

construction of the links. Contact will be Dr Paul Williamson, Bureau of

Resource Sciences, Canberra. Each member economy will, as soon as

possible, nominate a contact for the APEC GEMEED. Database and supply

to Austdia and to the Secretariat the names of agencies to be contacted

and existing databases of relevance to GEMEED. With the advice of a

Steering Committee as agreed below, the Secretariat wilI send a

questionnaire to the agencies nominated by member economies, seeking

Internet addresses for specific topics on which they already have material

available on the Internet. Australia will ensure that the initial linkages are in

place by the time of the Second Meeting of GEMEED in Seoul on 24-27

March 1997, Funding for this work will be sought from the APEC TILF

Fund. For member economies without existing Internet facilities, Australia

will receive any information provided in digital form, make it available on

the Internet through Australia’s linkages, and migrate it to the originating

country as soon as this is possible.

b. Steering Corn@&e

A Steering Committee consisting of one representative each from

Australia, Chile, Japan and Korea will cooperate on technical aspects of

design of the database. These countries will inform the Secretariat by 25

September 1996 of the name of their representative on the Steering

committee. Coordinator of the Steering Committee will be Tomas Astorga of

the Secretariat. The Secretariat will, as soon as possible, invite member

economies not able to be present at the Database Workshop to participate in

the Steering Committee if they wish. The Steering Committee will begin its

work as soon as possible and will meet immediately before the next meeting

of GEMEED in Seoul, Korea on 24-27 March 1997, to review progress and

agree on a report to GEMEED.

c. Engagement of consultant

The Secretariat will engage a consultant to provide expert advice to

ensure that the database created is as well designed and useful as possible.

19

The consultant should be abIe to begin work by December 1996 and have it

completed by March 1997, in time for the Second Meeting of GEMEED in

Smul. Funds for the consultancy will be sought from the APEC TJLF Fund.

The consukant wiIl design an Internet tempIate for member economies and

submit this with hk draft report to the Steering Committee by February

1997.

d, Timing for construction of the database

The GEMEED Database should grow over time, but an initial content

should be in place by March 1997. Content to be included should reflect

what member economies already have available, but as a minimum, all

member economies should aim, as a target, to make available the foIlowing

information within these time frames:

energy reserves and production, by field - by September 1997

metal reserves, supply and demand - by September 1998

studies on the supply and demand outIook, by commodities – by Sep.

1999. The Scheckde for development of the Database is at Annex 2,

e. Ongoing funding and monitoring of progress

Each meeting of GEMEED will review progress in construction and

filling of the database, and consider requirements for its continuing

development. Each member economy should review and, where possible,

update its data on the database every six months. Each member economy

should report briefly to each meeting of GEMEED on what it has achieved

since the last meeting. GEMEED will seek renewed funding from APEC

each year to support continuing development of the Database.

12 September 1996

20

!u~.

22

.<=7 . . .. ..-. $ ...,.-. . . . d.? ,,: . .. .,,,, ..”.,.,..,.,:,,.. ,., ,,, .,,.

“illm.-RECWG-GEMEED

GroupofExpertsonMineralsandIhergy ExplorationzmdDevelopmentMinerals and Energy related Directory

<Z= 3-2> APEC ~ ~ Oil and Gas Fields DB =m 01xl>

25

=1%%- ++3+= Zq$* ++3+= q$gq *ZJ+ Zq+lq -R++=

Hong Kong, ChineseAustralia 115 Mexico 106 5

china TaipeiBrunei

7 Indonesia 195 New Zealand 6 Thailand 5Darussalem

Papua NewCanada 55

46,607Japan 14 USA

Guinea - DOE pdf

Chile 21 Korea 8 Philippines 4

TotalChim 23 Malaysia 30 SingapoE -

47,201

3-1 ANMED

● ~ % % ‘d ‘~~%~ : Key contacts in government. industry and research.

. ~~ % +% XdY. : Bauxite. Black coal. Brown coal. Chromium. Cobalt. Copper.

Dkunonds, Gold. Flydro. Iron ore. Manganese ore. Mineral sands. Molybdenum.

Nickel, Platinum-group metals. Oil/gas/condensate. Oil shale. Tantalum, Tin.

Tungsten. Vanadium. Zinc. Lead. SiIver. Thermal. Uranium.

.q~ AJq~$3_ : Industry activity. Industry expenditure, Exploration,

Development. Development proposals. Production. Supply. Demand. Investment.

Service Industries and Consukants. Other reIated databases.

● % ?l +2?? WXl% E : Mining and petroleum law. Mineral and petroleum property

lz-eatment, Environment protection laws, Labour laws and regulations-

occupationaI health and safety. Immigration n.des for ski&d professionals. Land

access arrangements. Banking and currency transfer arrangements. Import and

export rules.

● %+$ 2J?SXl% Y : Fiscal treatment-Taxes and Royalties, Foreign investment

rules. Banking and currency transfer arrangements. Government programs or

incentives. Key contacts in government, industry and research. Venture capital

arrangements.

● =X] %Y_ : Environment protection laws. Land access arrangements. Banking

and currency transfer arrangements. Key contacts in government, industry and

research. Rehabilitation. Landowner benefits and compensation,

● xl+%%} +1E : Geoscientific and survey data. Metadatabases. Key contacts

in government, industry and research. Research and development.

27

.fle .,jidit,?t%f” .:@.’~@mrnw@it&“HahP.~ ‘“ ., “,’. ‘: . “ : “ ~ ~~ . ‘”...— ...- .-.”,... ”+_._. ,-. —.. ..%.- .. ..*..———.—..-.. .—.”-.=-.”4-----.4+..-.7, ,/

~:, ,Bg “:; .z#;:::.s:’”;*’;:,. ..Ai f ‘%ilt<; ““ %%?ii7%iF7i$iii~@:GmivStd~.Rkbad :“borne. %$itch. NetecaPe” FWt!:’ SEWNd“.-+ :.......F_- .....d.-.. ...<.-.-....-.-A---.----..-.-+-- .,--.---—.-..-—-—-”---- -—---—----— --+—--.-=7-----

‘wottmadjt$!:;~:wqil?yltql ://www.bre.gov,au/gemeed/anmedhni 31U!W~at a~ata~..

I APECNei3wrkof Minards andEmaq2gDatabases A(ANluED) I

‘II

28

*] 4 ‘i Oil and Gas Fields DB

1-1 7] XL

Oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I I

Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I 345

Production (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes, 1996) 27.0

R/P ratio (years) 13.4

Year of first commercial production 1964

Crude oil chamctenstics

Average gravity 46.0 “API

Proportion with less than 1% sulfur I ‘4100°

Light oil 98%

Medium oil o%Heavy oil 2%

Although drilling for oil took place as long ago as 1892, it was not ntil

well after World

then, numerous

War II that Australia

oil fields have been

achieved oil-producer

discovered, notably in

are as: Gippsland Basin(Bass strait), off Victoria: Cooper

status. Since

the following

Basin, South

Australia; Eromanga and Surat Elasins, Queensland: Carnarvon Basin

(North-west Shelf) off Western Australia: Bonaparte Basin in the Timor

Sea. Production of oil (including condensate and other NGL’s ) has

flu-ctuated in recent years: in 1996 it averaged 617,000 b/d, of which

crude oil accounted for 70%, condensate for 18% and LPG/ethane for

12%. just over 30% of Australia’s total oil output in 1996 was exported,

mostly to Japan and other Asian

Gas

destinations, the USA and New Zealand.

rProved amount in place (billion cubic meters) 1\Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) I 13601

Production (net, billion cubic meters, 1996) I 30.0

R/P ratio (years) I 41.1

lYear of first commercial production \ 19691

Natural Gas Characteristics

Heat value (MJ/ms)

H

Average

(gross calorific value, after, extraction of NGL’s) 37.2I

Non-hydrocarbon constituents(%) -3

Hydrogen sulfide(%) -o

Helium(%) -o

lCarbon dioxide(%) /-21

1-Nitrogen(%) -0.5

Exploration for hydrocarbons has discovered more natural gas than oil:

Australian proved reserves of gas as reported for the present Survey are in the

same bracket as those of China, Kuwait and Libya. Gross production grew by

over 60% between 1990 and 1996, reflecting in part agrowth in domestic demand

30

but more especially a substantial increase in

from the North West Shelf fields. The main

exports of LNG(principally to Japan)

gas-consuming sectors in Australia

are public electricity generation, thenon-ferrous metals industry and the

residential sector. The level of proved recoverable reserves reported in the present

Survey has been provided by the Bureau of Resource Sciences and corresponds

with their category “Economic Demonstrated Resources”: these are defined as

“resources judged to be economically extractable and for which the quantity and

quality are computed partly from specific measurement, and partly from

extrapolation for a reasonable distance on geological evidence. ”

Brunei Da.russalem

I Oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes)

Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 184




Although the earliest discoveries (Seria and Rasau fields) were made

on land, all subsequent oil fields were found in offshore waters. With

proved reserves of 1 350 million barrels, Brunei has the third highest

level in south-east Asia. There were 7 offshore fields in production in

1996, to-gether with the two original onshore fields: total output

(including about 16 000 b/d of natural gasoline) was 165 000 b/d,

somewhat lower than in recent years, About 95% of Brunei’s oil output is

exported, mostly to Japan, Thailand, South

31

Korea and Singapore,

Gas

Proved amount in place (billion cubic meters) I IProved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) I 399

Production (net, billion cubic meters, 1996) 9.4


Year of first commercial production .-

Natural gas was found in association with oil at Seria and other fields

in Brunei. For many years this resource was virtually unutilized, but in the

1960s a realization of the resource potential, coupled with the availability

of new technology for producing and transporting liquefied natural gas,

enabled a major gas export scheme to be devised. Since 1972 Brunei

has been exporting LNG to Japan, and more recently to the Korean

Re-public.

Despite annual exports

steady at just under 400

of 7–8 bcm, proved

bcm since 1990.

reserves have remained

Over 90% of Brunei’s marketed production is exported, the balance being

mostly used in the liquefaction plant, local power stations and offshore

oil and gas installations. Small quantities are used for residential

purposes in Seria and Kuala Belait.

32

Canada

Oil

I Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I 11724

I Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million t onne.s) I 844



I Year of first commercial Production I 186d

Crudeoil characteristics

Average gravity I 33 “API

Proportion with less than 1Y. sulfur I 100+

Light oil I 60~

Medium oil I 7?4

IHeavy oil I 33q

There is a very substantial oil resource base, albeit not on the scale of

the USA and Mexico. Resources and reserves have been reported by the

Energy Council of Canada in terms of the established amount in place

and established recoverable reserves. After many years as a comparatively

minor producer, Canada’s oil output became of real significance only

after major discoveries such as the Leduc field in 1947. Output advanced

rapidly from around 1950; crude oil production passed the million b/d

mark in 1968. In 1996 output of crude was 1.4 million b/d, that of NGL’s

(including

production

bitumen.

pentanes) 624 000 b/d. Canada is the world leader in the

of oil from deposits of oil sands–see the chapter on natural

33

Gas

Proved amount in place (billion cubic meters) I 7779

Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) I 2093



Year of first commercial production


Average RangeHeat value (MJ/I’If)

(9ross calorific value, after extration of NGL’s)37.4 30-55

Non-hydrocarbon constituents(%) 7 0-60

Hydrogen sulfide(%) 5 0-55

Helium(%) 0.4 0-0.5

Carbon dioxide(%) 2 0-20

Nitrogen(%) 1.7 0.1-15

Canada’s proved reserves are the third largest in the Western

Hemisphere, At end-1 996, 86% of “remaining established reserves” of

marketable natural gas consisted of non-associated deposits: the

provinces with the largest gas resources were Alberta (with 80,6% of

remaining established reserves), British Colombia

Saskatchewan (4.4%).

Grass production of Canadian natural gas was the third

world in 1996. Of the net output remaining after

(13.8%) and

highest in the

allowance for

re–injection, flaring and shrinkage, approximately half was exported to the

United States,

34

The largest users of gas within Canada are the industrial, residential and

commercial sectors.

Chile

Oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 1I Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I 34




Oil resources are on a fairly modest scale, and are located in the

Ma-gallanes Basin in the far south of the country, on or near the island

of Tierra del fuego: several oil and gas fields straddle the border with

Argentina, Chile’s portion of Magallanes has reached maturity, after

producing some 400 million barrels: oil output has fallen every year since

1982. In 1995, 60% of national production came from offshore wells,

23% from onshore wells on Tierra del Fuego and 17% from the

continental mainland: all is refined domestically. Proved recoverable

reserves, as published by Oil & Gas Journal, had remained virtually

unchanged for about ten years, but their latest assessment (reserves as

of January 1, 1998) indicates a reduction from 300 to 150 million barrels.

35

China

oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 18 122


Production (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes, 1996) 157.3—



The first significant oil find was the Lachunmia field in the north-central

province of Gsnsu, which was discovered in 1939. An extensive

exploration program, aimed at self–sufficiency in oil, was launched in

1950s; two major field complexes were discovered: Daqing(l 959) in

northeastern province of Heilongjiang and Shengli (1 961) near the Bo

the

the

Eiai

gulf. The latest advice received from the China National Committee of

the World Energy Council gives proved recoverable reserves approaching

5.3 billion tonnes, by far the largest of any country in Asia: oil output is

on a commensurate scale, with the 1996 level accounting for over 40°A

of the regional total. China exported about one–eighth of its crude oil

output in 1995.

GM

lProved amount in place (billion cubic meters) I -1Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) 1 171




36

Past gas discoveries have been much fewer than those of crude oil, which is reflected in

the fairly moderate level of proved reserves. Gas resemoim have been identi]ed in many

parts of China, including in particular the Sichuan Basin in the central region, the Tarim

Basin in the north-west and the Yinggehai (South China Sea).

In Janumy 1996, China began delivering natural gas to the Castle Peak power station in

Hong Kong via a pipeline from the offshore Yacheng field, deliveries in 1996 totaled

0.22bcrn.

Indonesia

Oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGI-’s, million tonnes)

Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes] 677



Year of first commercial production I 1885

Crude oil characteristics

Light oil 85.0%

Medium oil 9.9%

Heavy oil

The first commercial discovery of oil was made in north Sumatra in

1885: subsequent exploration led to the finding of oil fields in southern

Sumatra, java and Kalimantan. Although assessments of proved

recoverable reserves vary quite widely from one source to another, a

37

volume of at least 5 billion barrels can be observed, placing Indonesia in

the same bracket as India and Kazakhstan-all three falling well short of

China in this respect. In the context of its current production levels for

crude oil and condensate, Indonesia’s proved reserves appear to require

enhancement, if the R/P ratio is not to fall dangerously low. In 1995

Indonesia exported some 55% of its output of crude oil and

condensates,

LPG’s. It has

Gas

as well as a large part of its production of gas–plant

been a member of OPEC since 1962.

l------aPrcwed amount in place (billion cubic meters)

Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters)

Production (net, billion cubic meters, 1996)


lYear of first commercial production I -1


I!

Heat value (MJ/m”) (gross calorific value, after extraction of NGL’s) I 31.7 -43.6

lHydrogen sulfide(%) [ 0-0.55 \

lCarbon dioxide(%) I 0-71.21 I

Nitrogen(%)~

The level of proved recoverable reserves shown above corresponds

with that quoted by Oil & Gas Journal; the figure of 3 590 billion m3

quoted by C6digaz and OPEC includes both proved and probable

reserves.

38

Indonesia’s

are as are in

Exports of

Japan began

gas production is the highest in Asia. The main

northern Sumatra, Java and eastern Kalimantan.

producing

LNG from Arun (Sumatra) and Bontang (Kalimantan) to

in 1977–1 978. Indonesia has for many years been the

world’s leading exporter of LNG, Shipments in 1996 were chiefly to

Japan (70%) but also to the Korean Republic(24%) and Taiwan,

China(6%). Indonesia exports well over half of its marketed production.

The principal domestic consumers of natural gas are power stations,

fertilizer plants and the steel industry; the residential and commercial

sectors have relatively small shares.

Japan

Oil

I Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes.) I -I




I ‘fear of first commercial production I 18751

Indigenous oil resources are modest: a number of small fields have

been discovered on the islands of Honshu and Hokkaido, including two

in Honshu’s offshore waters. Approximately 50% of Japan’s 1995 crude

output of 14 000

small amounts of

b/d was produced offshore.

NGL’s) has drifted downward

39

Total oil output (including

in recent years.

Korea

In the 1970s, oil and gas exploration

international oil companies with the

offshore Korea was made by

concession from the Korean

government. They drilled 12 exploratory wells.

In 1979, PEDCO took over the exploration business in Korea and has

substantially expanded its business. Since 1983, PEDCO’S ambitious

exploration teams have conducted 63,355 I_-km of seismic survey and

drilled 18 exploratory wells. In 1987 and 1993, they found gas layers, but

the amount of confirmed gas reserves is not enough to develop

40

economically. PEDCO is now evaluating the total domestic continental

shelf, including Block VI-I to get additional gas reserves.

Korea has a vast continental shelf with an acreage of 300,000knf. Only a

limited area was explored. PEDCO will continue its exploration effort

until it becomes an oil and gas producer. In order to share benefits from

oil development on the Korean shelf, PEDCO is seeking honored partners

in the oil business.

Exploration Activities in Offshore Korea

Block Area(w) Seismic(L-km) Exploratory wells

I 36,460 6,477 1

II 39,433 13,301 4

Ill 41,427 8,193

Iv 42,449 11,314 1

v 42,390 11,995 4

VI-I 12,918 33,490 11

VI-2 11,668 10,998 2

JDZ 82,557 19,571 7

East Sea - 2,115

West Sea – 470

Total 309,302 117,924 30

Source : PEDCO(1998)

41

Malaysia

Oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I I

\ Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil arid NGL’s, million tonnes) I 526 \

r I


LR/P ratio (years) 15.1I

I Year of first commercial production I 191OI

Oil was discovered at Miri in northern Sarawak in 1910, thus beginning

Malaysia’s long history as an oil producer. However, it was not until after

successful exploration in offshore areas of Sarawak, Sabah and

peninsular Malaysia in the 1960s and 1970s that the republic really

emerged as a major producer. Generally speaking, proved reserves have

more than kept pace with production: at end-1 996, they stood at 4

billion barrels, compared with less than 3 billion at end-1 990. After

following a rising trend for many years, oil production has leveled off

since 1995, in line with the government’s National Depletion policy. in

1995, 60% of Malaysian crude oil production was exported, chiefly to

Thailand, Japan, Singapore and the Republic of Korea.

42

Gas

Proved amount in place (billion cubic meters)

Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) 2271


R/P ratio (years) 60.9.,



Average Range

Heat value (MJ/m”) 42.0 41-71(gross calorific value, after extraction of NGL’s)

Non-hydrocarbon constituents(%) 3.5 1.3-9.3

Hydrogen sulfide(%) N N

Helium(%) o 0Carbon dioxide(%) 2.8 0.9-8.7

Nitrogen(%) 0.7 0.0-0.8

Exploration of Malaysia’s offshore waters has located numerous fields

yielding natural gas or gas/condensates, mainly in the areas east of

thepeninsula and north of the Sarawak coast, Proved reserves have risen

to over 80 tcf and now rank as the second highest in Asia, after

Turkmenistan.

Malaysia became a major gas producer in 1983, when it

exporting LNG to Japan, This trade has continued

supplemented in recent years by LNG sales to South Korea

China. In 1996, Malaysia was the world’s fourth largest

offshore natural gas.

commenced

ever since,

and Taiwan,

producer of

43

Domestic consumption of gas has also been expanding rapidly in recent

years, the major market being power generation. The other principal

outlet for natural gas, apart from own use within the oil/gas industry, is

as feed stock/fuel for industrial users, Small amounts of CNG are used

in transport, following the launching of a government program to promote

its use.

Mexcio

Oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 6613




LYear of first commercial production 1904

Crude oil ckmcteristics

Proportion with less than 1% sulfur

\ Light oil I 20.24

] Medium oil I 31.894

IHeavy oi! I 48.0%4

Mexico is one of the largest oil producers in the world and at the end

of 1996 ‘possessed the eighth largest volume of proved recoverable

reserves, Its massive oil resource base has given rise to one of the

world’s largest oil industries, centered on the state enterprise petri Ieos

Mexicanos (Pemex), founded in 1938. Commercial oil production began

in 1904 and by 1918 the republic was the second largest producer in

44

the world. The discovery and development of oil fields along the eastern

side of the country-in particular, offshore fields in the Gulf of Campeche

have brought annual production up to its present level. Output of crude

oil, condensate and NGL’s in 1996 was 3 227 000 b/d; exports of crude

totaled 1,544,000 b/d, of which some 78% were consigned to the USA.

Gas

Proved amount in place (billion cubic meters) 1 916

Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) 1 810





I IAverage

Heat value (MJ/m”) (gross calorific value, after extraction of NG1.’s) 35.4

Although

they were

largest in

proved reserves have fallen each year since end-1 984, when

assessed as 2 172 billion cubic meters, they remain the third

North America, W}thin the 1996 total of 1 810 bcm, 57.1%

were located in the northern region, 25.4% in the southern region and

17.5% in the marine regions.

Production of natural gas was on a plateau during the early 1990s but

rose sharply in 1996, owing to the availability of associated gas from

new offshore fields. This rise in output was not, however, reflected in a

commensurate increase in marketed production, owing to a major

incident at the Cactus gas–processing plant, which restricted supplies of

45

dry gas (and led to increased flaring in the Gulf of Campeche fields).

By far the greater part-around 80-85%-of Mexico’s gas production is

associated with crude oil output, mostly in the southern producing areas,

both onshore and offshore.

The largest outlet for gas is as industrial fuel/feedstock (61% of total

disposals in 1996): the energy industry consumed about 21%, power

stations 15% and households about 3Y0, Mexico habitually exports

relatively small amounts of gas to the USA and imports somewhat larger

quantities.

New Zealand

Oil

proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 40

proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 15




The known oil resources are quite modest, with relatively more strength

in natural gas liquids than in crude oil. New Zealand possesses seven

sedimentary basins: oil and gas discoveries have been concentrated in

the Taranaki region on the west side of North Island. Minor quantities of

oil were produced from the Motorua field in Taranaki from 1935 to 1972.

46

Other fields subsequently brought into production include the (onshore)

Kapuni and (offshore) Maui gas/condensate fields and the onshore

Mckee oil field. Estimates of resources and reserves reported by the

Ministry of Commerce are in terms of “proven plus possible” values. Oil

output in 1996 comprised nearly 2 million tonnes of crude/condensate

and 0.2 million tonnes of gas–plant NGL’s. About two-thirds of the

crude/condensate was exported, very largely to Australia and the USA.

Gas

lPmved amount in place (billion cubic meters) I 146/

lProved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) I 681





Average

Heat value (MJ/m=) (gross calorific value, after extraction of NGL’s) 39.7

Non-hydrocarbon constituents(%)I

5.3

Hydrogen sulfide(%) o

Helium(%) o

1

Carbon dioxide(%) 2.6

Nitrogen(%) 2.7

The Maui offshore

hydrocarbon deposit so

about two-thirds of the

gas/condensate field is by far

far discovered in New Zealand; it

countty’s economically recoverable

the largest

accounts for

gas reserves.

47

Effective utilization of its gas resources has been a key factor in New

Zealand’s energy policy since the early 1980s.

The Maui field came into commercial production in 1979 when a pipeline

to the mainland was completed. Three plants were commissioned in the

1980s to use indigenous gas, producing (respectively) methanol,

ammonia/urea and synthetic gasoline.

An extensive transmission and distribution network serves industrial,

commercial and residential consumers in the North Island. Small (and

declining) amounts of CNG are used in motor vehicles.

Papua New Guinea

Oil

\ proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I -\

proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) 35


I R/P ratio (years) I 7.11

I Year of first commercial moduction I 1992 I

Five sedimentary basins are known to exist in PNG. Most exploration

activity, and all hydrocarbon discoveries to date, have been made in the

Papuan Basin in the southern part of the mainland. After many

campaigns of exploration (starting in 191 1), the first commercial

discoveries were eventually made during the second half of the 1980s.

48

I

Commercial production began in 1992 after an export pipeline had been

built, The oil exported is a blend called Kutubu Light(45 ‘API). Output

and exports in 1996 averaged just over 100 000 b/d.

Oil

Peru

lProved amount inplace (crude oiland NGL's, million tonnes) I -1





probably the oldest oil producer on the South American

Peru’s remaining recoverable reserves are comparatively

not much more than 100 million tonnes, one tenth those of

Although

continent,

slender, at

Brazil, Formany years oil production was centered on the fields in the

Costa (coastal) area in the north-west: from about 1960 onward the

Zocalo (continental shelf) off the north-west coast and the Oriente area

east of the Andes came into the picture. In 1995 the Oriente fields

accounted for about 65% of total oil output, the Costa fields for 19%

and the Zocalo 160A. Production overall has fluctuated within a narrow

band of 120,000-130,000 b/d in recent years,

49

Gas

rProved amount in place (billion cubic meters)

lProved recoverable reserves (biilion cubic meters) I 1991

lProdudion (net, billion cubic meters, 1996) I 1.01

R/P ratio (years) I >100


Proved reserves have been virtually stable at about 200 billion m3 since

1990. Gas output is mostly associated with oil production and its

historical development profile is similar to that of oil-a decline in the

1980s followed by a Ievelling–off in the present decade. An appreciable

prapotilon of production (18% in 1996) is flared .Marketed production of

gas has fluctuated around 1 bcm/year in recent times. Small quantities

are consumed in power stations and as an industrial and household fuel,

but by far the greater part of current output is used in the upstream

operations of the oil and gas industry,

A major step forward for Peruvian gas will be initiated if Shell and Mobil

decide to go ahead with the development of the Camisea gas field in

the south-east of the country.

50

Philippine

Oil




\ R/P ratio (years) I >100/

I Year of first commercial production I 1979/

Crude oil charectefitics

Average gravity 34.0 “API

Proportion with less than 1% sulfur 33.4%

Light oil 35.0%

Medium oil 65.0%

Heavy oil o

This is one of the more recent arrivals on the Asian

the first discoveries being made in 1976-1977.Except

fields on the islands of Cebu and Leyte, all oil finds

made offshore, in the South China Sea west of the

oil scene,

for a few

have been

islands of

Mindoro and Palawan. Proved reserves of crude oil and NGL’s at

end–1996 were some 225 million barrels, within a stated range of

189 to 261 million barrels. Output from the offshore Nido field

began in 1979, reaching a peak of 42 000 b/d by the end of the

year: a rapid decline soon set in, and national production has

never regained its 1979 level. In recent years, production has

come mostly from another offshore field (West Linapacan), but

water intrusion has cut output back drastically.

Russia Fedration

Oil

I Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I -I

I Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I 6654 I

I Production (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes, 1996) I 301.11

kR/P ratio (years) 21.8


The Russian oil industry has been developing for well over a century,

much of that time under the soviet centrally planned and state-owned

system. In which the achievement of physical production targets was of

prime importance. After World War II, hydrocarbons exploration and

production development shifted to the east, with the opening-up of the

Volga-Urals and West Siberia regions. Production levels advanced

strongly from the mid–1 950s to around 1980 when output leveled off for

.a decade, A decline set in from 1990, bringing total output of crude oil

ancl NGL’s to just over 300 million tonnes (6.1 million b/d) in 1996.

About 40% of oil production is exported.

52

Gas

Proved amount in place (billion cubic meters) 47700

Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) 47700



lYear of first commercial production I -1

The gas resource

estimates of Russia’s

base is by far the largest in the

proved reserves are twice those of

world: current

Iran and about

ten times those of the USA or Saudi Arabia. The greater part of the

Federation’s reserves are located in West Siberia, where the existence of

many giant and a number of super-giant gas fields has been proved,

The 1996 output of the Russian gas company Gazprom accounted for

94% of the Federation’s output and nearly a quarter of world gas

production. Russia is easily the largest exporter of natural gas in the

world: in 1996, 74 bcm went to Western Europe, 49 bcm to Central

Europe and 73 bcm to members of the CIS,

Chinese Taipei

Oil

I Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I -I



I R/P ratio (years) I 5.51

I Year of first commercial production I 19041

53


I 70%/

Medium oil 30%

Heavy oil o%

The first commercial oil field in what is now Taiwan, China was

discovered in 1904. Other small fields have been located over the years,

but the island’s overall oil resources are insignificant. Proved reserves are

only 4 million barrels and oil output has been static at 1 000 b/d of

crude (plus even smaller amounts of NGL’s) for the past five years.

Thailand

Oil


I Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes)] 28 I





I Average gravity I 39 “APII

I Proportion with less than 1% sulfur

i

Light oil 99.6%

Medium oil 0.4%1

LHeavy oil

54

Resources of crude oil and condensate are not very large in

comparison with other countries in the region. Official data show proved

reserves of oil as 115 million barrels, plus 126

condensate, while additional “probable & possible”

242 and 208 million barrels, respectively. About 35%

million barrels of

eserves are put at

of proved reserves

of oil, together with 100% of those of condensate, are located in

offshore areas in the Gulf of Thailand. Total output of oil (crude oil,

condensate and other NGL’s) has been on a gradually rising trend

throughout the present decade. Exports of condensate and natural

gasoline amounted to nearly 25,000 b/d in 1996.

the United State of America

oil

Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes)

Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I 3768



] Year of first commercial production I 1859I

characteristics

Light oil 39%

Medium oil 35%

Heavy oil 26%

The United States has one of the largest and oldest oil industries in

the world. Although its remaining recoverable reserves are dwarfed by

some of the Middle ,East producers, it is second only to Saudi Arabia in

terms of oil production. Proved reserves of crude oil have been on a

declining trend for many years, whereas those of natural

registered increases since 1994. Crude oil production in

000 b/d and that of NGL’s (including “pentanes plus”)

gas liquids have

1996 was 6 465

was 1 830 000

b/d. The USA exported 110 000 b/d of crude oil in 1996, principally to

the US Virgin Islands (for offshore processing), the Republic of Korea,

Canada, Taiwan, China and Japan.

Gas

Proved amount in place (billion cubic meters)

Proved recoverable reserves (billion cubic meters) I 4714


]R/P ratio (years) / 8.1]

LYear of first commercial production


t

Average

Heat value (MJ/m”) (gross calorific value, after extraction of NGL’s) 38.27

For the third successive year, US proved reserves increased in 1996,

‘with additions to reserves being equivalent to 107!X0 of 1996 natural gas

production.

The increase in reserves was partly due to revisions and adjustments to

estimates for old fields and partly to discoveries (field extensions, new

field discoveries and new reservoir discoveries in old field). Total

56

discoveries equaled the highest level in the past decade; they were

predominantly made in Texas and the Gulf of Mexico Federal Offshore,

Offshore development is likely to continue to be spurred by technological

advances in exploration and deepwater production.

About 82% of proved reserves consist of non-associated gas. The states

with the largest gas reserves at end–1 996 were Texas (23.OYO of total

US), New Mexico

Reserves in Federal

16,7% of the total.

(9.9%), Oklahoma (7,9%) and Wyoming (7.4%).

Offshore areas in the Gulf of Mexico represented

Vietnam

Oil

I Proved amount in place (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes) I -1

I Proved recoverable reserves (crude oil and NGL’s, million tonnes)\ 82 I




During the first half of the 1980s oil was discovered offshore in three

fields (Bach Ho, Rong and Dai Hung), and further discoveries have since

been made: proved reserves are assessed at 600 million barrels.

Production of crude oil (averaging 34 API)” began in 1986 and has risen

steadily: at present all output is exported.

Source : Survey o Energy Resources 998 ,WEC (World Energy Council)

57

Australia

Well Cum.Name of fie Id ;:a’”

Depth Prod. API(ft) ~; Total Avg(t)/d)

(19~7;?8bl)Gravity

Mount Homer 19653,800

-5,8002 7 26 20,240 38.0

IEUabiru 1983 4,786 2 2 14,352 7,565,029 42.3

lIIiHarriet 1983 6,230 10 10 10,760 6,668,000 38.2

Anabranch 1965 4,188 . .. 1 4 13,701 44.0

Duarran 1964 4,105 . .. 1 . .. 14,036 37.0

Maffra 1965 4,251 1 2 17 28,086 48.0

Richmond 1963 3,643 . .. 1 2 16,345 43.0

Snake Creek 1964 4,990 . .. 1 4 12,658 67.0

Sunny Bank 1962 6,139 . .. 1 . .. 706 40.0

Trinidad 1965 4,599 ... 2 3 63,446 46.0

!@lBarracouta 1965 4,550 2 2 3,690 33,277,000 62.8

Hbfarlin 1966 5,100 1 4 11,410 54,629,500 50.0

EIKingfish 1967 7,500 26 37 43,440 934,636,400 46.9

Ell+alibut 1967 7,700 10 17 64,290 689,006,000 43.3

l@Mackerel 1969 7,700 18 18 80,790 347,077,800 45.6

HTuna 1968 6,500 20 22 6,780 32,786,700 40.5

❑ lSnapper 1968 4,350 16 21 4,710 11,906,400 47.0

❑ lCobia 1972 7,700 10 12 49,620 65,075,900 44.6

EIWest Kingfish 1968 7,500 15 18 41,800 46,622,780 46.9

58

Discov

Name of field ery

year

lEIFortescue 1978

EIFlounder 1968

Kooroopa 1985

Talgeberry 1985

Washpool 1985

Toobunyah 1985

E- 1985

1986

IBorah Creek I 1982

IKincora I 1980

ISandy CreekI

1982

IWaratah

IITintaburra

I

IMonlor

}

E--Cranstoun

Blina

ISundown

1982

1984

1987

1987

1981

1983

IWest Terrace I 1985

LloydI

1987

Well3epth ‘prod Prod.

CumAPI

(ft) ~el,” Total Avg. (b/d) (I ~:;&bl) Gravity

7,7001 2:

8,2001 t

3,3001 11

3,9001 :II

5,2501 1

3,5001 5,I

3,8001 2

25 91,930 142,895,000 43.0

10 16,960 13,271,900 46.7

1 9 12,312 42.0

3 356 217,882 46.0

1 4 715 35.0

5 300 198,683 43.0

2 11

2,700 1 1 77 44,129 43.0

4,900 1 3 36 11,584 34.0

II4,700 2 2 33 I 296,342 I 34.0 I

4,900 1 1 4 8,685 34.0

5,350 4 4 71 262,047 34.0

3,500 6 6 449 424,864 43.0

4,150 1 1 68 5,875 49.0

4,250 1 1 140 4,071 48.0

4,300 6 6 438 1,058,202 37.0

3,600 4 4 65 165,626 39.0

3,800 1 1 55 105,686 33.0

4,806 1 1 94 14,419 37.0

59

Well Cum

Name of field Di;:;rery D~f:;h ProdProd. API

~el,” Total Avg.(b/d) (I ~~7;:Bb,) Gravity

Bodalla South 19844,800 ~ ~

2,425 2,758,48147..2

-5,230 -48.7

Kenmore 19854,600 48.2

-4,980 9 92,639 1,959,951

-45.8

Black Stump 1986 5,360 1 1 126 118,373 45.2

Glenvale 1985 3,800 1 1 37 17,834 49.3

Jackson 1981 4,750 32 32400

16,354 18,834,000 _48”o

Jackson South 1982 4,800 6 6 1,144 1,884,000 40.8

Chookoo 1985 6,000 3 3 306 245,000 45.0

Wilson 1983 5,000 5 5 458 526,000 40.0

Naccowlah1983 6,000 7 7

40.0

South914 2,069,000 _46 o

Gunna 1983 6,000 1 1 37 71,000 40.0

Tinpilla 1983 6,000 1 1 38 66,000 .40.0

Naccowlah

West1983 5,700 8 8 1,195 1,546,000 40.0

Bogala 1984 6,900 2 2 159 244,000 40.0

Yanda 1984 8,000 1 1 92 41,000 40.0

Mooliampah 1985 6,000 1 1 76 64,000 40.0

Watson South 1985 5,500 1 1 825 511,000 40.0

Sigma 1983 5,700 2 2 132 71,000 40.0

Tickalara 1984 5,600 4 4 291 149,000 40.0

Big Lake 1984 6,600 2 2 29845.0

280,000 _48 o

60

Name of fieldDiscovery Depth

WellProd.

CumAPI

year (ft) P:e; ‘ Total Avg,(b/d) ~19~7;;Bb11 Gravity

Gidgealpa 1984 6,150 10 11 1,809 2,004,00045.0

-50.0

McKinlay 1985 5,100 1 1 36 26,000 41.0

Strzelecki 1978 5,800 16 16 4,518 11,305,00043.0

-49.0

Dullingari 1979 5,200 16 17 3,787 6,587,000 54.0

Narcoonowie 1983 6,000 2 2 134 118,00052.0

-53.0LimestoneCreelyBiala

1984 5,100 9 9 1,454 992,000 41.0

Wancoocha 1984 6,000 5 5 818 1,060,00044.0

-54.0

Muteroo 1985 6,000 3 3 1,785 1,512,000 45.0

Spencer 1986 6,500 4 5 1,038 468,000 47.0

Jena 1985 5,200 1 1 83 56,000 41.0

Alwyn 1985 5,200 1 1 127 77,000 41.0

Merrimelia 1983 . .. 9 9 1,252 2,507,000 .. .

Meranji 1985 . .. 3 3 401 317,000 .. .

Bookabourdie 1985 ... 2 2 116 48,000 .. .

Dirkala 1986 7,000 1 1 697 474,000 56.0

Nungaroo 1985 4,150 1 1 74 39,000 40.0

Ulandi 1985 5,200 1 1 63 62,000 40.4

Watson 1985 . .. 2 2 206 64,000 .. .

Cooroo/CoorooNorth

1986 ... 3 3 1,438 473,000 .. .

61

WellDiscovery Depth prod Prod.

CumName of field

APIyear. (ft) ~e,l’ Total Avg. (b/d) {I &7;&) Gravity

Challum 1983 ... 1 1 19 13,000 ...

Kerinna 1984 4,300 1 1 29 15,000 41.0

Kercummura 1985 ... ... ... ... 1,000 50.8

Cook 1985 ... . .. ... 25 23,000 ...

Toby 1987 ... 1 1 5 1,000 .. .

Dingera 1987 ... 1 1 NA ... .. .

Pitchery 1988 . .. 1 1 NA . .. .. .

Munro 1988 ... 1 1 NA .. . .. .

NaccowalahEast

1988 . .. ‘1 1 NA . .. .. .

Mawson 1987 . .. 1 1 173 51,000 .. .

Pintari North 1988 . .. 1 1 NA . .. .. .

Taloola 1988 . .. 2 2 NA . .. .. .

Sturt 1988 . .. 1 1 NA . .. .. .

Tantanna 1988 . .. 3 3 NA . .. .. .

Tirrawarra 1970 9,500 28 35 4,770 7,685,227 52.0

6151 1,163,6191 46.91

\

Moorari 19717,705 ~

-9,400

Fly Lake 1971 9,300 1 3 94 469,454 53.0

E3rolga 1983 9,547 1 1 39 45,211 53.0

Woolkina 1982 9,700 1 1 26 98,546 51.5

62

Moonie 1961

Alton 1964

H

R%=-l-=

h-iWellDepth prod, Prod.

(ft) ~e~l Total Avg.(b/d)

w4,000 24 36 2,581

1,200-6.7(KI

407 516 17,447

5,250 s ~–5.577

111

%4-++-=1 I I 1

Narrows I 19865,740 1 1

a*

++

3,209,269 48.9

224,561,262 37.7

927,370 35.5

NockatunQa 1983 5,420 4 5

Winna 1985 4,526 1 1\

Koora 1985 4,822 1 2

Thungo 1986 4,670 1 1

Kihee 1986 3,200 1 1

Woodada’c’ 1980 7,400 ,.. . .., #

North Herald 1982 3,937 1 1 ... 15,914 44.0

South Pepper 1982 4,036 1 1 ... 345 44.0

Total 926 1,148 550,000 2,737,768,713

Source: Oil & Gas Journal

+=Ha52.0

59.0

59.0

49.6

46.3

41.7

45.7

44.7

54.0

El OfFsho~, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

63

Brunei Darissalem—

Name ofWell Cum

Di;e’”rery ‘epth Prod.Prod.

Prod.API

field (ft) Total Avg. (b/d)(1987 )(Bbl)well

Gravity

•l Fairley 1969 10,740 37 54 13,157 107,200,000 40.0

~ Amps1963

7,06898 219 43,694

515,500,00041.0

Sw -8,155

❑ Magpie 1975 .. . 16 23 17,718 66,900,000 31.0—

IEk2hampion 1970 4,300 106 210 39,846 285,800,000 34.0

Seria 1929 ... 346 585 20,277—

Rasau 1929 .. . 5 9 4,508

Other . .. .. . 13,000,000 .. ... . .. .

Total 81 119 2,613 22,025,548—

Source: Oil & GasJournal El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

Canada

FFName of Discoverfield year

Acheson 1950

IBantry I 1940

Bellshill Lake 1955

Bonnie Glen 1952

HCarson CreekN.

1958

Cessford 1950

Clive 1951

ICountessI

1951

Gilby I 1962

HarmattanEikton I 1955

wIJoffre I 1953

HJudy Creek 1951

Kaybob 1957

Kaybob S. 1958

WellDepth prod Prod.

CumAPI

(ft) ~e,l” Total Avg. (b/d) (I ~:7;:Bbl) Gravity

3,390 62 118 12,986 120,066,226 38.0

2,574-3,300

150 184 6,647 46,537,461 .. .

f2,950 419 432 12,980 58,646,234 ...

3,959144 170 23,229 496,104,770

34.0-6,779 -44.0

8,787-8,935 4’

74 9,967 136,947,486 44.0

2,800-3,028

196 272 3,523 29,739,639 .. .

6,704-6,208

120 169 5,436 49,182,090 ...

2,858-4,272

116 148 7,258 61,650,607 .. .

3,900-5,400

145 318 18,300 312,219,206 32.0

4,201-7,000

85 155 3,116 46,423,510 .. .

3,570 69 84-5,961

2,371 180,961,066 36.0

.. . 87 149 4,131 70,926,216 . ..

8,796-10,75 62 76

4,581 60,444,189 .. .

6,730 33 74

-8,4405,752 73,761,997 .. .

3,179 204 288 5,382 100,259,782 .. .

4,983-6,779

88 167 3,892 81,882,361 .. .

8,307-8,701

190 266 18,915 388,265,226 43.0

4,870 56 88-9,577

5,856 100,629,149 .. .

5,600-0.042

711 100 9,5921 76,445,9821.. .

I

Name of “Well Cum

D’s;::rery Dg;h Prod.Prod. API

field ~el, Total Avg. (b/d) ~,~y;;6b,) Gravity

Leduc-Woodbend

1947 .:’:; 348 737 4,604 375,198,288 40.0

Lloydminster 19331,690

-1,945500 836 5,863 47,200,642 .. .

Medicine1954

5,435River -7,600

246 347 10,220 67,323,063 .. .

Mitsue 1964 5,908 250 386 25,401 271,263,665 43.0

Nipisi 19655,648

-5,726244 340 31,912 263,581,751 41.0

Pembina 1953 _;’;;: 3,315 4,055 93,541 “204’’56”: 32,0 -37.0

Provost 19462,760

-2,898949 1,308 17,938 70,388,031 . ..

Rainbow 19654,994

-6,160261 339 48,992 497,656,724 38.0 -42.0

Rainbow1965

6,102 so 81South -6,400

7,029 62,063,923 .. .

Red Earth 19564,184

-4,878174 259 4,942 36,024,951 .. .

Redwater 1948 _;’::: 587 848 15,145 784,068,674 35.0

Simonette 1958 10,500 33 46 2,460 37,367,554 ...

Snipe Lake 1962 8,500 48 95 3,785 52,574,155 . ..

Sturgeon1953

4,912

Lake S. -8,47192 146 15,992 137,010,616 37.0

Sundre 19548,700

-9,00054 69 3,182 35,791,800 ..4

Swan Hills 1957 8,100 589 !320 40,545 667,109,678 40,0

Swan Hills S. 1959 8,400 178 198 18,009 338,479,554 .. .

Turner Valley 19133,100

-9,150101 158 2,655 138,926,474 39.0

Utikuma Lake 1963 5,624 104 138 4,461 43,380,838 .. .

66

Name of Discovery Depth prodWell

Prod.CumProd.

APIfield year (ft) “ Total Avg.(b/d)

well (1987) (Bbl) ‘raviw

Virginia Hills 1957 9,210 126 183 16,958 141,966,553 34.0

Wainwright 19251,903

-2,200617 760 9,684 65,562,771 ...

Westerose 1952 6,818 28 35 15,048 125,517,746 ...

WillisdenGreen

1956 5,157 572 797 9,416 114,056,076 .. .

Wizard Lake 19514,044 38 48

14,372 318,444,912 .. .5.973

Zama 3,702 136 242 5,914 73,391,28433.0

-37.0

Other .. . 8,770 13,103 358,948 1,501,088,846 ...

Boundary1957

3,418Lake -4,575

287 348 11,171 167,805,481 40.0

Other .. . 391 829 24,749 253,385,577 .. .

All Fields .. . 1,434 1,624 13,479 161,286,112 ...

Steelman 1950 4,600 660 721 9,188 251,994,739 .. .

Weyburn 1955 4,600 809 878 17,793 280,897,407 .. .

Other .. . 12,378 16,144 180,528 1,647,494,821 .. .

All Fields .. . 1,175 1,494 2,293 61,049,607 .. .

Ail Fields .,. .. . ... 9 802,951 .. .

All Fields .. . ... .. . 26,413 54,571,770

Total 37,882 51,744 1,236,553 12,839,976,429

Source:Oil & Gas Journal I@offshore, (c)Condenstate, (e)l%timated

67

Chile

Name of field Discovery Depth Well Prod. Cum APIyear (ft) Prod. Total Avg. (b/d) Prod. Gravity

well (1987)(Bbl)Canadon 1962 6,090 13 63 236 14,468,812 38.4

Daniel 1960 5,806 4 119 165 34,434,471 25.4

Daniel Este 1961 5,523 5 64 490 28,311,574 25.0

Dungeness 1962 5,251 3 19 107 3,915,136 28.6

Posesion 1960 5,622 33 75 838 21,176,251 63.6

Other ... 22 120 2,336 22,192,977 . ..

Calafate 1955 6,045 13 61 1,008 25,561,335 49.3

Catalina Sur 1961 5,779 4 43 25 6,360,443 44.0

Cullen 1954 5,730 16 107 382 40,980,042 41.8

Tres Lagos 1957 5,724 18 84 366 15,826,176 40.1

Catalina 1956 5,756 10 26 1,788 6,204,654 38.7

Gorrion 1986 6,025 6 6 947 375,381 39.0

San Sebastian Norte 1986 6,870 4 4 227 87,726 37.0

Other . .. 33 255 1,538 57,773,725 . ..

Ostion 1977 7,156 15 18 1,468 7,724,254 33.0

Posesion 1977 6,727 12 39 1,102 5,169,663 34.5

Spiteful 1977 6,298 35 82 5,036 41,014,552 34.5

Spiteful Norte 1978 7,150 13 55 799 9,213,168 39.0

Daniel 1977 6,126 28 36 3,140 3,423,262 35.9

Este-DungenessPejerrey 1984 7,229 36 75 7;855 8,274,097 39.0

Jaiba 1978 6,650 2 2 871 25,251 46.5

Total 325 1,353 30,724 352,512,97n

Source: Oil & Gas Journal ❑ Offshore, (c)Condenstate, e)Estimated

68

Indonesia

3,974

;ebang I 1977 I 2,91~ 20E

(. Simpang 19713,74

-5.01

‘. Tabuhan I 1937I 3,35-5.89 ~

<antau I 1929 I 2,764

;erang Jaya I 1926 I 3,701

lenuang

3enakat East

fempino

3n. Kemala+

1942 6,10

1973 N

1931 1,64

1938 ‘ 5,4

41

.imau I 1928 I 3,89-4,62 ~

)gan TimurI

1943I

ralang Jimar 1937I

r. MiringI

1935I

ranjung Tiga I 1938 I 3,75(4

(enali Asam I 1931I

II3elimbing . .. 5,37111 1 I

69

~

rotal

22(

1,41$

Prod.4vg.@l@

69,66[

cum ~1

Prod.[1987M3bl)

Gmvity

‘,928,974,192 51.5

54.0

45.0

50.8

45.3

47.5

35.1

NA

23.0

38.0

NA

27.42

31.0

NA

28.0

29.0

.. .

Namoffkld ‘iscove~ D;; :; ‘;oM’ *:g=&year

<uang 1940 5,24S

Cemara 1976-7.10

Jatibarang 1969 3,06

Tugu Barat 1979 3,01

3urlyu 1923 2,07 161 334

Sangatta 1939 1,84

Tanjung 1938 2,29

Tapian Timur 1967 4,39

Wa,rukin S., 1966 2,06

<Iamono 1936

_inda 1977 ‘ 3,281

Sele 1951 2,15

Sa{30 1940 1,80C 354 354

-irik 1939 1,60C

Plolek 1956 2,60C

N.pulai 1941 1,80C

S. F’ulai 1941 1,800

cumProd.

(1987M3bl~

APIGmvity

25.1

..

29.C

..

33.2

33.0

39.s

38.E

26.S

19.0

19.0

35.C

34.C

34.C

34.0

34.0

34.0

70

Nan. of field ‘iscove~ D;: ‘1%: ‘:oal *:g~;,d) ‘“ ‘1Prod.year(1987M13bl)

Gmvity

Talang Akar 1922 2,800 35.0

Benakat 1932 1,60C 35.C

Jirah 1930 2,300 35.0

~ajah 1940 6,000 38.0

Ahab 1951 6,000 36.0

Sembakung 1976 2,600 17 Is 36.C

Elangkudulis 1980 3,250 . .. 1 39.5

Salawati 1976 5,749 7 13 39.2

All Fields1893 2,15~ 71 41~

- 1909 -2,297..

Ardjuna 19692,380 26 33

- 7,25C37.C

Arimbi 1972 ‘2,943 10 12 33.C

3ula 1897280 61 7

- 1,3001,29S 14,632,00C 23.C

~atang 1975 690 12 20 31C 916,000 19.2

3uaya 1978 2,035 . .. 2 .. . 96,00C 28.C

-indai 1971 1,1OC 16 Ie 55C 3,022,000 30.7

Menggala S., 1968 3,765 1 1 480 7,669,00C 33.5

71

DepthWell cum

Name of field ‘lscOveProd. API

ry year . (ft) :; Toti Avg.(bfd) ~ Gravity

Tanjung Medan 1976 2,770 2 7 38C 890,000 37.6

Benua 1978 2,400 19 22 4,930 7,357,000 41.4

Beruk 1974 1,750 17 23 5,310 22,080,00C 38.0

Bungsu 1976 2,05C 7 8 75C 5,303,00C 38.4

3arnar 1974 4,65C 5 6 270 2,225,00C 33.5

3usun 1979 2,550 6 1,310 2,332,00C 42.3

Gatam 1977 2,385 3 .. . 314,000 33.5

<asikan 1972 660 18 2 470 2,894,000 27.3

Beruk NE 1976 1,800 3 9C 796,000 40.0

Osam 1978 900 4 150 384,000 31.8

Paitan 1978 2,315 1 1 Ilc 305,00C 31.6

‘eolada 1973 950 30 31 5,680 32,503,000 33.1

%saka 1977 2,25C 19 2 2,99C 5,101,OOC 34.6

Sabak 1974 ‘ 2,35C 14 1 88C 8,805,00C 35.8

Terantam 1973 90C 4 8C 335.00C 31. 7

Zamrud 1975 3,60 c 5?.5 11,46 c 28,945,00 c 40.QQ

Langgak 1976 1,38 c 1-?2 64 c 2,056,00 c 31. 7

Geudondong 1965 3,19 2 . .. . .. .. . .. 53.1

JUIU Rayeu 1968 2,83 2 9 6 22 1 12,284,05 6 53. 6

ee Tabeu 1971 2,72 1, 37 47 11,891,66 4 50, 3.

72

WellName of field

Discove~ [email protected] Prod Prod. APIyear (ft) ~ell Total Avg.(bid) & Gravity

Alur Cimon 1972 3,098 . .. 34 .. .. 50.8

Tualang 1973 2,631 13 75 2,602 29,601,774 49.9

‘eudawa 1980 3,083 . .. 30 .. . .. 48.1

<Iuang 1913 2,591 3C 88 595 33,674,78Ll 42.6

Mangunjaya 1934 2,700 8 110 138 22,980,07~ 32.0

Tanjung Laban 1982 3,590 16 24 5,609 4,567,078 38.1

qam ba 1982 3,150 60 65 28,360 35,936,98E 37.0

?awa 1985 4,038 . .. 18 1 57,28S 38.7

Tempino 1931 4,493 3 17 152 1,259,127 40.9

Bentayan 1932 4,446 6 13 825 672,555 22.0

Oanerokan 1976 4,915 3 8 3E 178,846 39.4

~Cinta 1970 3,500 36 46 13,158 171,187,861 34.0

ZIG ita 1972 5,000 6 9 1,036 6,452,24~ 34.5

g Kitty 1973 2,700 6 7 1,161 13,61 5,26~ 18.0

2!0 Nora 1973 3,200 3 5 391 8,667,165 29.C

Xl Roma 1974 3,200 44 75 7,381 88,607,804 31 .C

Xl Selatan 1971 4,000 8 19 1,277 20,402,184 19.5

~Zelda 1971 7,50C 27 43 6,303 34,764, 75~ 33.0

lIJKrisna 1979 4,50C 28 41 7,413 57,130,762 37.0

@Yvonne 1980 4,500 9 11 4,016 11 ,317,58t? 36.C

73

Well cum~qme of field D~cc’”cry Depfi Prod Prod.

Prod.API

year. (ft) ~eu” Total Avg.(bid)(1987M3bl)

Gravity

=lFarkja 1982 8,000 Ic 22 3,118 10,581,595 32.0

EITiti 1982 8,000 .. . 4 ... 1,654,547 33.0

ASundari 1982 4,40C 12 15 3,371 9,700,36!5 25.0

@Duma 1983 2,300 3 6 158 657,997 16.0

~Kamila 1983 4,80C 7 9 10,585 25,813,993 36.0

Wanda 1984 4,80C L c 110 1,549,42S 36.C

Canderawasih 1976 3,500 11 17 1,268 11 ,697,05~ 27.8

Jaya 1973 3,050 14 19 1,785 35,366,50S 42,0

<asim 1972 3,350 3E 4s 4,79C 45,774,41 s 38.C

Walio 1975 2,750 224 268 17,803 146,754,005 34.2

Other . .. .. 11 22 1,883 11,882,221 ...

Aman 1974 4,70C lC 10 2,343 6,021,389,337 38.6

Antara 1978 1,425 c K 700 35,9

Balam SE 1972 4,50C 12 12 671 29.0

i3alam South 1969 1,60C 4E 4E 8,446 33.4

Bangko 1970 1,950 75 85 26,341 33.7

9atang CPI 1975 690 6 7 286 19.0

9ekasap 1955 2,950 53 6C 20,392 33.7

Bekasap S., 1968 3,90C 8 11 736 34.1

WellDiscovery Depth ~mdNameof field Prod.

year (ft) well Toti Avg(bid)Prod.

987)(Bbl

I 1973 I 2,4501 2+ 24 4,42$/

Cebakan 1974 4,700 4 4 61 S

II ri 1941 77C 1,073 1,370 80,105

Saruk 1980 4,600 1 2 4

Hitam 1975 6,69C 4 5 1,343

ntan 1977 3,35C 6 6 864

Jorang 1972 5,50C Id 18 9,123

Kerang 1977 3,900 11 13 1,044%

Kopar 1974 5,300 13 18 2,582

Kotabatak 1952 5,500 67 113 18,384

Kulin 1970 2,050 55 61 4,843

.ibo SE 1973 5,90C 24 27 10,32~

-ibo 1968 6,00C 9 10 1,711

-incak 1981 2,570 4 4 72~

Nlenggala N., 1968 3,850 14 17 4,136

Menggala S.CPI.

1968 3,765 7 8 1,852

Minas 1944 2,60C 465 604 254,99C

Mindal 1971 3,400 2 3 74

Ylutiara 1976 3,500 2 2 3E

75

—I i

Name of fieldDiscove~ Depl

year (ft) well -..

YeHa 1977 5,000 3 3 47

Obor 1978 7,370 1 1 149

‘ager 1974 4,30C 23 25 6,544

‘e!ita 1977 6,600 G 5 621

aernatang 1959 3,750 37 43 8,682

‘ernatang Bow 1969 5,300 5 9 851

Pemburu 1981 2,30C 8 9 3,70s

Perkebunan 1977 2,300 . .. 1 .. .

Petani 1964 4,750 33 34 14,478

‘etapahan 1971 4,500 23 28 5,736

‘inang 1971 3,950 19 2C 2,355

‘inggir 1972 3,300 5 6 373

Pinggir S., 1973 3,300 2 2 56

Qudu 1972 5,950 8 12 1,614

‘uncak 1979 2,400 14 14 3,769

Pungut 1951 3,40C 27 27 4,850

?angau 1968 6,1OC 3 10 104

Rantaubais 1972 1,07C 14 16 543

~ckiri 1979 6,100 . .. 2 ..

Seruni 1972 3,00C 22 23 4,821

(l Y3’7)(kJt)J)

7’6

~me offieldDiscoveV Depthyear (ft) ,,w*,

\ lYO/ )IDUL}

Sikladi 1975 4,340 18 18 2,593 39.8

Singa 1977 3,200 1 1 55 31.0

Sintong 1971 3,400 1s 20 2,005 32.3

Sinton SE 1973 4,50C .. . 1 .. 36.1

Suram 1971 1,750 4 6 252 27.7

Tandun 1969 3,000 9 9 740 33.2

Telinga 1975 4,205 7 8 925 33.3

Topaz 1977 5,200 7 7 1,992 33.2

Yopi 1979 3,63C 1 1 62 36.7

Tunas 1983 4,819 2 2 370 35.0

Jbi 1976 4,35C 20 21 1,584 35.1

Waduk 1982 6,100 Ic 11 324 37.e

Binio 1972 1;600 2C 21 454 11,677,943 34.0

‘ekan 1976 3,700 22 22 795 7,573,274 35.0

Llerbau 1979 2,70C 2E 26 1,299 6,334,383 36.0

<erum utan 1980 3,000 22 23 1,162 4,711 ,49d 35.0

Y Merbau 1980 2,60C 8 9 272 2,750,090 36.0

?anduk 1981 2,500 6 6 228 1,401,271 46.0

77

DiscoveryWell

Depth ‘ ~d Prod.Name of field

yeq (ft) ‘- ToMAvg.(b/d) ~well

Kayuara 1982 3,70G 9 lC 55s 1,878,81C 35.

1983 2,800 17 17 1,505 1,928J59 34.

3. Kayuara 1983 3,50C 45 49 5,698 5238.225 35.

Mutiara 1985 2,70C 2 2 79 97,163 34.

other 4,60C ... .. ... 9,175

;bul 1970 5,70C 12 14 76C 21,667,05C 36.

Rambutan 1972 4,500 5 7 29 3210,751 42.

glTabuan(PSC) 4,00C 10 lC 1J2C 1,178,193 34,

Jene 1985 6,50C a lC 93564 4,085,391 35.

Pian 1986 6,000 1 1 217 26,512 36.

~Kerang (PSC) 1984 2,90C 2 3 744 271,616 35.

[I.agan 1986 2,40C 4 4 290 111.815 56,

,other 4,50C 3 3 196 868,406 ...

5,19C3aqak 1972

-10,60c3[ 107 5,362 37,953,108 32.C

7,50C j ~ ~aYilam 1974

-1I,50C > 18,47023 S 32.

?amaguan 1974 900- 5,1OC 142 7 1,962 5,898,117 30.C

Mutiara 1984 900-5,80 cl 21 9 2,599 2,961,789 30,C

embed 19742,900

-10,10~ “““1 6 “’“7,054 35.0

WellName of field ‘iscovev D;: ~1 ~o,d *::;;d) ;:. ‘1

year(1987M3bl)

Gravity

~Tambora” 1980 8,000- 13,00 4,1 0s 5,667,498 33.C

@lHandil 1974 272 115,033 617,340,703 33.C

El Bekapai 1972 15,845 152,065,282 40.0

2Attaka 1970 47,116 433,197,460 39.0

#EIMelahin 1972 7,50 3 6 888 6,217,272 23.1

~Kerindingan 1972 8 2C 5,038,615 23.8

ELSepinggan 1973 5,855 41,580,242 34.0

@Yakin 1976 8,917 18,290,674 18.8

S Rajah 1981 5,50 3 3 1,672 3,596,380 33.8

@lUndang 1974 8,646 53,319,790 40.0

~Kepiting 1982 6,00 2 2 2,57C 1,094,050 37.C

Arun 1971 ‘ 10,05 57 110,815 293,625,359 55.0

Samboja 1909 360-4,38 28 126 487 64,387,468 21.0

Sanga Sanga 1897 275-6,00 107 24C 2,941 266,631,554 32.0

Tarakan 1906 200-6,54 130 1,165 1,73C 210,151,159 20.0

211Kakap KH 1980 16,150 9,343,000 45.0

L

79

well cumDiscoveg Depth prod Prod. API

Name of field(ft)

Prodyear well” TOWIAvg.(bid)

[1987M13bl)Gravity

ZILalang 19803,1 Oc ,=

-3,600Ie 10,870 30,550,00C 39.E

~Mengkapan 19813,85

8,440,000 42.C

Iil Melibur 198490C ,

-1 ,30C13 8,680 3,21 0,00C 35.6

~ Kurau 19864,500

-5,00C7 7 . .. . .. 47.4

Tarakan(Mamburungar 1984

5,227-5,291

2 4 . .. . .. 31.1field)

Total 6,065 10,677 1,186,000 12,330,062,000

Source: Oil & Gas Journal El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

80

Japan

Discovery DepthWell

Prod.Cum

Name of fieldAPI

year (ft) p;e;” Total Avg. (b/d) (I ~~;fBb,) Gravity

I❑ lAga-Oki I 1972 I 7,590 7] 71 12,2001139,623,0001 24.8[

lEIHigashi-Niig1965

4,500 ,8 28ata -9,200

53.9

I@Sarukawa 19582,000

-3,20062 134 32.3

EdYoshii 1968 8,000 9 25 61.8

EIYurihara 19761,310 ~ ,4

-7,61043.5

EIKatakai 19603,310

-16,300 5 ‘650.0

❑ ilOther .. . . .. 56 77 .. .

El Agaoki-Kits 1982 4,950 10 10 33.0

EIYabase1933 1,100

-5,800 6’ 7333.0

EIMinami-Aga 19647,300

-9,600 ‘0 2638.5

lEIMinami 1984 13,200-Nagaoka -15,100 5 “

55.7

EdHagashi1970

6,000-Kashiwazaki -8,900 6 ‘3

62.0

lEIKubiki1959 1,100

-6,40094 125 29.7

❑ lOther 35 47 k .. .

Total387 606

12,200 139,623,000

Source: Oil & Gas Journal EdOffshore, (c)Condenstate, (e)Estirnated

81

Malaysia

Name of field Discovery Depth Well Prod. Cum API

year (ft) prod. Total A“g-(b/d) Prod. Gravitywell (1987) (Bbl)

@ Bekok 1976 5,500 23 30 268,000 759,820,000 47.0

~ Pulai 1973 4,300 23 32 42.3

II Tapis 1975 6,700 70 106 45.0

iJ Kepong 1979 6,000 3 10 47.0

iJ ~ong 1978 5,800 28 42 47.0

El Tinggi 1980 4,400 26 31 48.0

~ IroflgBarat 1979 3,300 10 12 35.0

~ Semangkok 1980 3,700 5 5 42.5

iJ Guntong 1978 .. . 9 14 . ..

d Palas 1979 .. . 11 11 . ..

~ Tabu 1978 .. . 9 13 . ..

El Tembungo 1971 6,000 8 16 10,620 31,276,000 40.0

~ Fairley 1973 8,655 . .. 2 ... 5,845,000 39.5

laram

d D18 1981 4,000 5 5 4,160 1,618,000 35.0

@ West Lutong 1966 5,600 12 27 10,110121,690,000 39.5

El !3aram 1963 9,500 12 36 7,640 135,989,000 40.5

El Bakau 1971 1,1000 3 3 130 7,047,000 39.0

82

F==

l===

EE Baronia

I@ Betty

E Tukau

E Bokor

❑ Siwa

I

TDiscovery Depth

year (ft)

z1972 3,100

1976 4,200

$1967 7,900

1967 7,900

1966 5,000

1972 2,000

1973 4,100

z1975 2,200

1977 6,785

1972 5,700

1977 4,80C

— Well Prod. Cum API~d. Total Avg+(bfd) Prod. GravityNell (1987 )(Bbl)

18 31 9,070 36,211,000 35.0

6 7 13,750 21,719,000 35.0

B 1

19 40 15,260 148,770,000 42.0

13 17 14,320 62,327,000 38.0

26 48 22,600 91,749,000 29.2

18 19 24,140 34,011,000 35.0

4 4 1,360 1,496,000 25.0

I i 1 1

4 4 3,920 9,331,000 37.01 I t 1

7 15 3,010 13,499,000 30.0,

11 14 16,360 20,271,000 32.0’

15 19 6,630 21,620,000 30.0

49 70 53,370 235,380,000 37.0

1 6 550 901,000 33.0

Source:Oil & Gas Journal I@ Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

83

Mexico

LWell

Name of fieldDiscovery Depth ‘prod

year (ft) ~el, ” Total A

IMision I 1945 I 5,4401 31 312

Monterrey 1950 6,510 5 6

Tigrillo 1971 3,342 .. . 11

@l Areque 1970 11,362 17 17

Constituciones 1956 6,350 176 176

Ebano-Panuco 1901 1,450 324 324

Tamaulipas I ... I 4,2001 1521 1521

Chicontepec 1973 4,264 220 220

❑ llsla de Lobos 1963 6,875 9 9

❑ Marsopa 1974 10,198 7 7

Naranjos-C Azul 1909 1,800 206 206

Tres Hermanos 1959 6,960 34 34

Other . .. . .. .. . .. .

El Atun 1966 9,040 7 7

❑ Bagre 1973 10,919 8 8

Escolin 1942 7,216 95 95

Hallazgo 1955 10,170 36 36

Jiliapa 1958 7,390 29 29

84


CumName of field

APIyear (ft) ~ell” Total Avg.(b/d) ~,~~7;:ab,) Gravity

Mecatepec 1941 7,544 32 32 29.8

Miquetla 1959 6,480 57 57 35.0

Poza Rica 1930 7,090 132 132 35.0

Pres Aleman 1949 8,036 86 86 26.0

Remolino 1962 10,745 36 36 29.5

San Andres 1956 10,410 123 123 29.0

Other . .. . .. 315 316 . ..

Matapionche 1974 11,129 29 45 35.6

Other .. . . .. 22 31 . ..

Ixhuatlan Ote 1965 1,960 20 34 22.6

Moloacan 1962 500 170 207 22.3

Santa Rosa 1952 1,312 6 9 25.4

Acuatempa 1955 .4,085 6 6 21.0

Muro 1965 3,966 11 19 17.0

Ordonez 1952 5,220 8 8 21.0

Ocotepec 1953 3,737 13 13 20.0

Santa Agueda 1953 4,780 3 3 16.0

Other . .. 57 57 . ..

Agata 1956 3,830 9 15 . ..

Bacal 1976 3,500 24 40 35.0

Well CumName of field Di=;::re~ D;:; Prod.

Prod. API~e,, Total Avg. (b/d) ~,~~;:gb,l Gravity

Conception 1974 1,600 3 15 31.0

Cuichapa 1935 2,200 63 123 30.0

El Plan 1931 1,700 67 86 30.0

Lacamango 1973 1,700 18 27 26.3

Los Soldados 1953 4,492 18 22 32.0

Other . .. 26 38 . ..

Blasillo 1967 7,216 31 58 40.0

CincoPresidentes

1960 6,862 73 134 35.0

BllrrO 1931 2,200 23 38 26.0

Vents 1954 4,730 20 83 41.0

Ogarrio 1957 5,790 57 194 38.0

Otates 1965 7,469 12 18 39.0

Rodador 1971 11,398 14 14 26.0

SanchezMagallanes

1957 4,240 73 345 27.0

San Ramon 1967 9,517 29 65 30.0

Tonala 1928 1,770 31 61 28.0

Other ... . .. 3 15 ., .

86

WellName of field

13iscovery Depth prod Prod.year (ft) ~el, ” Total Avg.(bid)

lAgave I 1977 I 13,4501 71 161

Arroyo Zanapa 1978 14,599 1 2

Arteza 1977 11,800 3 5

Ayapa 1972 8,200 3 5

Cacho Lopez 1977 14,250 1 1

Cactus 1972 14,100 14 30

Carrizo 1962 3,500 18 35

Castarrical 1967 10,080 38 59

Comoapa 1979 14,432 4 6

Copano 1977 11,890 9 10

Cunduacan 1974 13,775 12 42

El Golpe 1963 3,500 93 135

Giraldas 1977 15,225 21 22

Iride 1974 13,775 12 16

Muspac 1982 9,676 1 13

Mecoacan 1957 2,200 17 30\

Mora 1981 ... 61 63

Mundo Nuevo 1977 11,800 4 5

Nispero 1974 14,100 4 18

Paredon 1978 15,690 12 13

CumProd.

API

[1987) (Bbl) ‘raviw

41.7

38.9

26.4

7.2

29.0

31.5

23.3

29.3

44.5

43.9

28.9

25.7

37.0

28.5

57.0

8.6

38.1

46.0

34.4

39.8

87

Discovery DepthWell

Name of fieldyear (ft) F“e:” Total

Prod.Aver.(b/d)

10xiacacwe I .. . I 11,1501 51 211

lSamaria(Cret) I 1973 I 14,2091 261 491

ISantuario I 1966 ISitio Grande 1972 13,766 19 22

Sunualpa 1978 12,887 2 7

Tapijuapa 1982 15,613 1 12

Tintal 1968 5,904 4 6

lTopen I 1978 I 11,1721 21 31

ITupilco I 1959 I 9,685 671 101

Bellota 1982 17,056 9 12

Cardenas 1979 17,548 26 45

Chiapas 1979 12,136 5 7

1Fenix 1979 17,876 4 7

Iris 1979 14,432 8 8

Jujo 1980 17,548 18 19

Caparroso 1982 18,368 1 1

Tecominoacan 1983 19,519 1 5

}

Jolote 1983 18,119 1 1

Artesa Terc., 1984 .. . 2 3

88

Discovery DepthWell

Name of fieldProd.

year (ft) p’e;” Total Avg. (b/d)

;arm ito 1980 10,050 1 1

:den 1983 17,590 1 2

;amaria Terc., 1965 4,920 16 23

)ther ... ... 16 37

EICantarell 1976 8,528 63 75

EIAbkatun 1978 11,800 25 35

KIKu 1979 10,000 8 15

EIPOI 1979 12,600 8 8

ilChuc 1982 13,100 1 3

Ellxtoc 1984 . .. 1 2

Total 3,768 5,120 2,541 ,00(

Cum-i

Prod.API

(1987) (Bbl) ‘raviw

45.6

38.5

13.9

. ..

21.3

30.0

22.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

14,676,444,000

Source:Oil & Gas Journal g offsho~, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

89

New Zealand

od.

~

Na”me of field Discovery Depth

tEl Maui 1969 11,000 12 14

Mckee 1980 7,848 17 19-8,251

Kaimiro 1982 11,900 1 1

Tariki 1986 ... 1 1

Ahuroa 1987 .. . 1 1

Total 40 45 2900C

Cum I API

-t-

prod. gravity(1987)(Bbl)78,539,000 54.(

F!j8.(

38.!

r 46.’

L.,+ ,

Souree:Oil & Gas Journal ❑ Offshore, (c)Condmstate, (c)Estimated

90

Peru

Discovery DepthWell

Prod.Cum

Name of fieldAPI

year (ft) p:e:” Total Avg. (b/d) (I ~~7.:6bl) Gravity

❑ lPena1960

3,000 -

Negra 8,500168 284 12,296 104,197,142 38.0

❑ lLobitos 19603,500-

7,500 115 249 8,322 50,006,041 38.0

❑ lLitoral 19551,500- 92 138 2,642 36,409,940

36.06,000 -40.0

❑ lProvidencia 19673,000- 36 80 38.0

7,0001,757 20,834,644 _40 o

Other .. . 4 11 125 197,346 .. .

❑ lBartra 19798,000- ,0 ,6

8,9305,240 17,049,168 11.6

HCapahuari1973

11,800- ,7 26

Sur 12,90010,337 128,708,116 33.2

EIDorissa 19789,800-10,600 7 ‘2

8,782 34,591,373 30.8

EIForestal 19739,000- 8 ,0

9,9006,663 32,660,815 18.1

lEIHuayuri 197710,000- ~ ,2

10,8004,397 17,406,645 27.1

lEISan Jacinto 19787,200- 13.1

9,760 ‘2 227,027 26,908,128 _23 s

❑ lShiviyacu 19739,100- ,5 22

1,0,80023,012 58,561,369 20.4

lEIJibaro 19741o,11o-

10,155 5 63,222 6,338,698 10.7

❑ lJibarito 19819,000- 4 s

9,6506,311 9,651,813 10.5

Other .. . 3 11 1,029 2,210,471 .. .

Talara area1,343-

6,080770 1,219 7,226 44,628,171 33.2

Talara-Limaarea

1869 2::; 2,152 5,975 26,347 945,336,088 34.1

91

Name of field

2orrientes

Pzwayacu

N. Esperanza

‘tanayacu

Oapirona

dalencia

%Wa Central

Total

)iscoveoyear

1971

1972

1980

1974

1972

1975

Well CumD;f;; Prod

Prod. API

~el,” Total Avg.(bid) (1 ~~7;:Bb,) Gravity

10,000-12,600 32 36

22,823 86,601,829 29.8

9,600-11,300 ‘0 ‘4 3,301 15,315,532 30.2

10,200 z a-10,700 1,149 4,549,394 44.0

.11,400 7 8

-13,600 1,295 3,771,578 19.1

. ..I 46 53 1,460

3,529 8,219

Some: Oil & Gas Journal E Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

92

Name of field

!@South Nido

❑ Matinloc

❑Cadlao

South Tara

Total

Philippines

Discovery DepthWell

Prod.Cum

APIdate (ft) p;e;” Totoal Avg. (b/d) (I ~y;:eb,) gravity

19776,576

-6,885 3 5684 15,200,730 27.1

19786,656

-6,750 5 52,684 8,853,496 43.[

19775,734 z z

-5,8812,085 9,203,358 45.(

19874,335

-4,436 ‘ ‘52 19,078 40.1

11 13 5,505 33,276,662

Source: Oil & Gas journal El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

93

Chinese Taipei


CumName of field

APIyear (ft) “ Total Avg. (bfd)

(19~7t?Bbl)wellGravity

‘iechengshan’c’ 1959 . .. 25 33 1,060 15,306,500 51.0

:hingtsohuic’ 1967 . .. 5 18 48 50.0

‘unghoshan’c’ 1971 . .. 23 33 270 6,301,067 45.0

;huhuangkeng’c’ 1960 . .. 24 26 146 50.0

iJ CBK~cJ 1986 . .. 4 9 1,089 417,981 47.0

Total 81 119 2,613 22,025,548

Source:Oil & Gas Journal El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

94

Thailand


CumName of field

APIyear (ft) we,,” Total Avg. (b/d) (I ~:;;Bb,) Gravity

ElErawan ,i=’ 1973 7,000 88 119 6,356 14,446,200 54.6

EIBaanpot,’c’ 1980 7,000 20 21 438 1,180,400 54.6

BIPlatong, ~cJ 1976 8,500 29 43 3,647 4,084,700 59.1

ELSatun,’C) 1980 8,500 56 58 4,728 4,020,500 55.1

5,258 so 61~irikit 1981

-5,97616,180 27,865,000 41.0

lirikit West 1983 5,500 2 2 500 474,000 41.0

‘ru Krathiam 1984 . .. . .. 2 30 11,000 19.0

Total 245 306 31,879 52,081,800

Source: Oil & Gas JournallEloffshm, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

95

Australia

Name of fieldDisc. Depth Prod. 1995 Prod. API

date ft oil well avg. , bld grav”@

AUSTRALIA lgWandoo 1991 2,000 5 13,190 19.5

APACHE HAlkimos 1994 6,207 1 39 39.0

❑ jlHarriet 1983 6,230 13 10,904 38.2

❑Tanarni 1991 6,010 1 683 43.0

BHP ❑Challis/Cassini 1984 5,000 7 8,400 39.5

‘ETROLEUM ❑ lGriffin area 1989 8,630 9 53,700 55.0

PN .LTD t@Jabiru 1983 4,786 5 12,300 42.3

l@3kua 1986 7,545 2 3,700 42.5

BORAL Beharra

ENERGY1990 10,827 3 57 62.0

springs(c)

7ESOURCESKatnook (c)

LTD.1989 9,394 2 41 52.0

CONSOLIDA

TED GAS Woodad(c) 1980 7,800 6 6 53.6

PTY. LTD.

DISCOVERYMount Honrer

‘ETROLEUM1965 4,987 7 380 35.5

—❑ Barracouta 1965 4,550 8 2,100 62,8

tEIBream 1969 6,200 16 17,800 45.4

❑ lCobia 1972 7,700 9 8,400 44.6

❑ Dolphin 1967 4,000 1 5,800 45.0

❑ Flounder 1968 8,200 13 22,600 46.7

ESSO–BHP ❑ Fortescue 1978 7,700 17 20,200 43.0

❑ lHalibut 1967 7,700 15 28,800 43.3

❑ Kingfish 1967 7,500 32 36,000 46.9

❑ Mackerel 1969 7,700 25 18,600 45.6

lEIMarlin 1966 5,100 18 10,000 50,0

❑ Perch 1968 3,700 1 3,700 41.0

96

Name of fieldDisc. Depth Prod. 1995 Prod. API

date ft oil well avg. , b/d 9rav-&

EiSeahorse 1978 4,700 1 500 5.0

iIdSnapper 1968 4,350 8 5,200 47.0

lEITarwhine 1981 4,500 1 4,900 65.0

ETuna 1968 6,500 15 13,300 40.5

lEIWest Kingfish 1968 7,500 20 29,400 46.9

EilWhiting 1983 4,800 4 1,500 52.9

MOSAIC OILFairymount 1985 6,700 4 96 50.3

N.L. ‘

Barrow Island 19641,200

438-6,700

13,393 37,7

WAPETDongara 1969

5,2501

GROUP56

-5,57735.5

Thevenard 4,600

Island1985 21

-5,75046,339 48.2

WESTERN l@Chervil 1983 3,450 2 520 44.0

MINING HNorth Herald 1983 4,000 1 170 42.0

CORP. ❑ iSouth Pepper 1982 4,000 7 3,000 42.0

WOODSIDE

OFFSHORE❑ lGoodwyn 1972 9,680 5 29,400 29.4

PETROLEUM❑ lNorth Rankin 1972 9,840 19 35,600 54.5

PTY. LTD.

AGL Mereenie 1964 4,000 24 45,443 48.9

+TROLEUM( Moonie 1961 58,000 19 44.5

e) Roma . ...

OIL Bargie 1994 5,682 1 45.6COMPANY

OFBlack Stump 1986 3,815 1 45.2

‘USTRAL’A Bodalla South 19844,789

6 47.8LTD. (e) -5,215

97

Name of fieldDisc. \ Depth

date ft

Prod. 1995 Prod. API

)il well avg. , b/d 9 rav-@I I

I 1

3ogoon River1990 4.660 11 I 47.8

YAllaSt

<enmore 1985

Fliverslea 1981

4,593

-A QRfI

4,950J--l l-----

2 I I 48.2

----/

1 1-37.05,350

5,250 ] 34.0

1 I I 35.04,884

BHP

‘PETROLEUM

Beechwood

(c)1981 5,692 1 I I 38.0

L....Boxleigh (c) 1970 5,300

Broadway (c) \ 1983 . ...

5,790

5,817

5,463

Il-ark (c) 1993 1 ....

1 ....

1 ....

1 ....

6 .. ..

2 . .. .

5 47.0

1 ....

North Boxleigh ,991

(cl

Roswin North

(c)1992 5,873

Roswin (c) 1984 5,756

5,300

5,430

Toylor (c) 1988 5,538

5,817

98

Disc.Name of field

Depth Prod.

date ft oil well

3ANTOS (e)

3ANTOS (e)

Blina 1981 4,300 6

I I 1

Dilkera 1986 3,446 1

Koora 1986 3,176 1

, I

Nockatunga 1983 3,318 3

Sundown 1983 3,800 3

ThungoI

1986I 3,998 I 5

West terrace 1983 I 3,800I

o

Winna I 1985 I 3,334 I 2

Bogala I 1984 I 6,900 I 346

Challum 1983 ....

I IChookoo 1985 6,000

Cook I 1985 .. .. ICooroo 1986 .. ..

1995 Prod.

avg. , b/d

API

g rav ‘ty

37.0

37.0

45.0

45.0

39.0

45.0

45.0

45.0

45.0

33.0

45.0

32.8

45.0

.. . .

.. . .

.. ..

. ..

45.0

.. ..

Disc.Name of field

Depth

date ftI I

:orella 1989 .. ..

=chuburraI I

....

1 I

Senoa ...

North II

Jackson I 1982 I 4,800

=+-t--=

+-

West

100

Prod.

oil well

1995 Prod.

avg. , b/d

API

g rav itY

.. ..

....

... .

.. ..

.. ..

40.0

40.0

-48.0

40.0

.. ..

.. ..

.. ..

.. ..

.. ..

.. ..

.. ..

.. ..

. ...

.. ..

.. ..

Name of fieldDisc. Depth Prod.

date ft oil well

Tinpilla1

1983I

6,000I

I I I I

Wandilp I I .... I

Waston I 1985 .. .. IWaston

South1985 5,500

Wilson I 1983I 5,000 I1 t

Yanda I 1984 I 8,000 II I I I I

~

❑ Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimate

1995 Prod. API

avg. , b/d g rav”ti

.. ..

....

.. ..

40.0

.. ..

.. ..

42.0

506,217

101

Brunei darissalem

Name of field ‘ Discovery Depth , Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oil well avg b/d grav”w

‘SHELL❑ lAmpa SW 1963

7,068-8.155

151 43,731 41.0

lEIChampion 1970 4,300 299 60,470 23.0

lEIEnggang 2 639 .. ..

❑ lFairley 1969 10,740 28 6,990 40.0

HFairley-B1973 9,500 3 2,630 40.0

aram

❑ llGannet .. .. .... 0 40.0

EIllron Duke 1973 ... 4 5,955 .. ..

EIMagpie 1975 . ... 20 9,651 31.0

Rasau 1929 . .. . 17 6,313 30.0

Seria-Tali 1929 ... .. 312 15,115 34.0

‘TotalBrunei

766 151,494

El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

102

Canada

‘Name of field Disc. Depth, I Producing I 1995 Prod. I APII date \ ft I oil well I avg. ,b/d I grav-ti

ALBERTA Acheson 1950 3,390 52 2,411 38.0

13antry 1940 2,574 221 9,219 ....--3,300

Bellshill 1955 2,950 463 11,575 34.0-44Lake .0

Bonnie Glen 1952 3,959 101 3,998 . .. .-6.779

Caroline .... 169 4,742 44.0

Carson 1958 8,787 44 5,099 ... .Creek N. -8,935

Cessford 1950 2,800 234 3,818 . .. .–3.r-l?r+

Clive 1951 6,074 112 4,841 .,..-6,028

Countess 1951 2,858 147 10,447 32.0-4?77

Fenn Big 1950 3,900 89 2,570 . .. .Valley -5,400

Gilby 1962 4,201 136 7,728 36.0-7,000

Golden 1949 3,570 55 1,572 ....spike -5,961

Grand Forks \ II .... 18,7591 . .. .

Harmattan

I1954 6,358 72 3,368 . .. .

East -8,766

Harmarron 1955 8,796 60 2,881 ....Flktrm –1(-).757

Hayter 1968 2,030 479 17,679 . .. .-2,815

Innisfail 1956 6,730 28 1,009 . .. .-8,400

Joarcam 1949 3,179 124 3,736 . .. .

Joffre 1953 4,983 86 3,577 . .. .-6,779

Judy Creek 1951 8,307 134 12,465 43.0-8,701

103

—Nameoffield Disc. W 1

grav-~avg. ,b/d

~ybobI

1957

i---

4,870 66-9,577

5,600 55-10,042

4,740 . ...

.. ..9,095

+

.educ-Wood 1947~end

Joydmimster 1933

-t-

3,062 96-5,380

1,690 324-1,945

1,570 .. ..

4,398 .. ..

+

bfedicine 19547iver

blitsue 1964

Nipisi 1965

+

5,435 244-7,600

5,908 273

5,648 268-5,726

8,418 .. ..

20,071

19,876

.. ..

41.0

‘embina I1953 3,000 3,331

-6,13357,036 32.0

-37.0

Provost 1946

*

2,760 3,446-2,898

4,994 252-6,160

6,102 51-6,400

107,213 .. ..

30,206 38.0-42.0

RainbowI

1965

5,697 .. ..

4,184 185-4,878

6,730 .. ..

35.0RedwaterI

1948

*

2,012 614-3,200

10,500 35

8,500 35

4,912 83-8,471

11,887

RiE-hR- 7,860 .. ..

1,572Snipe Lake \ 1962 .. ..

37.0Sturgeon I 1953 7,086

*

30,951

7,702

40.0

.. ..

s. ITaber N.

I1966 3,110- 235

3,27012,999 .. ..

104

Nameoffield Disc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oil well avg. ,b/d grav-Ry

Turner Valley 1913 3,100 106 2,155 39.0-9,150

Utikuma Lake 1963 5,624 128 9,149 . .. .

Valhalla 1973 1,815 484 21,423 ... .-7,060

Virginia Hills 1957 9,210 110 12,637 34.0

Wainwright 1925 1,903 597 6,902 . ...

-2,200

Westerose 1952 6,818 33 3,065 . ...

Westemp .. .. 17 2,913 . .. .

Willisden 1956 5,157 480 5,757 . .. .Green

Wizard Lake 1951 4,044 47 2,766 . .. .-5,973

Zama 1966” 3,702 108 5,494 33.0-37.0

Other .... 10,464 396,145 . .. .

BRITISH Boundary 1957 3,418 254 7,663 40.0COLUMBIA Lake -4,575

Eagle West ,1976 2,170 44 2,283 ....-3,940

Other .. .. 498 24,726 . .. .

EAST El Cohasset .. .. 8 18,845 ... .COAST

E Panuke .... 2 2,553 ... .

MANITOBA Total for all . ... 1,354 11,080 . .. .fields

NEW Total for all .... . ... .. .. ... .BRUNSWICK fields

105

—Nameoffield Disc. \ Depth, I Producing

NC)RTHWESTTERRITORIES

8( ARCTICISLANDS

CINTARIO

SASKATCHEWAN

TotalCanada

@ Offshore,

Total for all .4.. 1,140fields

Steelman 1950 . .. . 591

Weyburn 1955 4,600 931

Other . .. . 14,512

45,554

(c) Condenstate, (c)Estimated

633 ....

29,272 ,...

4,921 I .. ..

6,881 ....

27,157 .. ..

287,930 .. ..

1,378,951

106

Chile

Nameoffield Disc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilwell avg. ,bld gravity

ENAP - Canadon 1962 6,090 4 34 38.420 NTINENTE

Daniel 1960 5,806 25 509 25.4

Daniel Este 1961 5,523 9 95 25.0

Delgada 1958 7,694 10 144 35.0

Dungeness 1962 5,251 8 141 28.6

Faro Este 1959 7,381 5 128 35.0

Posesion 1960 5,622 39 298 63.6

ENAP - Anguila AN-1 1989 5,758 9 404 32.0COSTA

AFUERA Atun AT-1 1992 5,722 6 104 33.0

Catalina Norte 1989 5,807 6 288 38.0

Daniel 1990 5,840 14 188 35.0

Daniel 1984 6,126 22 383 35.9

Este-Dunaeness

Ostion 1979 7,156 12 224 33.0

pejerrey 1984 7,229 16 315 39.0

Posesion 1980 6,727 15 243 34.5

Suka 1988 5,932 24 1,179 32.0

Spiteful 1979 6,288 13 393 34.5

Spiteful Norte 1980 7,150 5 128 39.0

Terrarmar 1991 6,211 8 946 33.0

107

—Nameoff ield Disc. Depth , Producing 1995 Prod. API

date ft oihvell avg. ,b/d gravity

=NAP–ISN Calafate 1956 6,045 7 150 49.3

Catalina 1956 5,756 4 94 38.7

~

Catalina Sur 1962 5,779 4 56 44.0

Cullen 1954 5,730 14 360 41.8

Cullen Este 1988 5,479 1 58 40.0

Flamenco 1954 6,545 5 208 40.2

Gaviota Norte 1990 “7,000 5 123 38.0

Golondria 1978 5,906 1 72 37.0

Gorrion 1986 6,025 3 75 39.0

Lago Mercedes 1992 12,468 1 65 . .. .

Punta Baja 1954 7,545 4 120 39.0

Sombrero Este 1992 6,506 2 301 36,0

Tres Lagos 1957 5,724 16 132 40.1

~otalChile 1,231 506,217

—

~E Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (e)EstixnatedSouroe :Intemational Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997 / PennWell

publishing CO.

108

China

Name of f ield I Disc. I Depth,I date

CNPC

*

Northeast

Daqing

LiaoheI

IJilin

North

ft

....

....

.. ..

Huabel I ....Dagang .. ..

Jidong ....

East

Shengil ....

Zhongyuan .. ..

Jiangshu .. ..

Annui ....

Jianghan I ....

‘reducingoilwell

49.700

T1995 Prod. APIavg. ,b/d g rav’@

1,123,207 . .. .

311,313 . .. .

+

93,455 ... .

86,236 . ...

--1-601,698 .,..

82,293 . ...

20,338 ... .

1,009 . ...

17,053 ....

Name of f ield

IDisc.date

I TotalChina

Northwest IXinjiang IChangging I

+

Yanchang

Tarim

Turpan-Hami

Yumen ISouthwest I

=l---L-1

Y,G&GI

Other ‘1

❑ lOffshore II

Depth, Producingft oilweli

4.........+

....—

.. ..

----1....

4........

+

.. ..

....

.... I

.... II 49.700

1995 Prod. APIavg., b/d arav”~

1

II

158,501 . ...I

724,407 . .. .

14,746 . .. .

+

50,763 . .. .

44,285 . .. .

--t

8,102

----1-3,455

2,048

11,315 . .. .

X168,789 ....

2,983,989

❑ Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)EstimatedSource :International Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997/ PemWell

Publishing Co.

Indonesia

Name of f ieldDisc. Depth,date ft

%oducingoilwell

1995 Prod. [ APIavg. ,b/d gravity

❑Anoa 1984 3,415,610 7,03044.5

-45.0AMOSEAS

Pagerungan(c) 19946,550

-8,455

=?----+

ARBNI 9

365EIArdjuna 19692,380

-7,250

❑ lArimbi 1972 2,943

❑ Bima 19833,000

-3,888

24

34ARCO

EINorthwestComer

19745,411

-5,80015

Alur Cimon 1972 3,098

App 1950 701 I . . .

ASAMERA

Bago 1977 2,250

Bentayan 1932 4,446

Bertak 1988 4,364

Bijak 1987 1,705

Geodondong 1965 3,192

I

E,..

22.0

27.4

300 21,568

L

52.0

==+’+= I ...

1=53.6

I 49.0Keban 1941I

1,358I I

F...

41.5

42.6Kluang 1913 2,591

NameoffieldDisc. Depth. Producing 1995 Prod. AP 1date ft oilwell avg. ,bld grav”m

Le Tabue . .. .. .

Mangunjaya 1934 2,700

Merbau 1979 600 32.0

Meuranti 1978 750.. .

Panarukan 1976 4,915.. .

39.4Peudawa 1980 3,083

48.1Peureulaw . ..

.. .Ramba 1982 3,150

Rantau37.0

Paniianfl...

.. .

Rawa 1985 4,08637.0

SouthRawa

1985 4,08637.0

Supat 1984 4,62633.6

TanjungI ahan

1982 3,59038.1

Tempino 1931 1,647 40.9

Tengah 1984 3,245 34.7

Tuaiang 1973 2,631 49.9

BC~NHAM/ENlM/ENERGYE Harimau . .. 5 423 .. .

QUITY I

Air Serdang 198830.1

BOW 5,248-32.0

VALLEYITAU 79 12,397SMAN Guruh 1991 5,681 30.0

—

112

I I I

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producingdate ft oilwell

CALTEXPACIFIC

IN DON ESIA

I I I

AmanI

1974 I 4,700

Ampuh I 1981 I 6,000 I

Antara I 1978 I 1,425I I

*Balam SE I 1972 I 4,500 I

I I IBalam S I 1969 I 1,600

Bangko I 1970 I 1,950

Batang I 1975 I 690I 1

Bekasap I 1955i

2,950

Bekasap S I 1968 I 3,900 4,414

Bekasap SE 1968 . ..1 t

i

Benar I 1973 I 2,450

Benua I 1978 I 2,4001I I I

Beruk I 1974I 1,850Beruk NE I 1976 I 1,800

I I IBeruk NO I 1985 I 1,900

Buaya I 1978I 2,035

%ungsu I 1976 I 2,050

Butun I 1982I

4,000

Cebakan I 1974 I 4,700

1995 Prod. APIavg. ,b/d gravity

39.0

38.0

36.0

...

. ..

29.0

33.0

34.0

19.0

34.0

697,135 34.0

34.0

33.0

37.0

38.0

40.0

38.0

28.0

38.0

44.0

30.0

113

1

Name off ieldDisc. Depth, Producingdate ft oilwell

—

—

Cucut 1981 5,800

Duri 1941 770

Dusan 1979 2,550

Garuk I 1980 I 4,600

GatamI

1977I

2,385

+++

Genting . ..

Giti .. .

Hitam 1975 6,690

HiuI

1983I

5,900

1995 Prod. APIavg. ,b/d grav.Ry

I 34.0

L=...I 22.0

t==r 31.0I[

t--

34.0

I...

}

. ..

39.0

I 40.0

t-

39.0

33.0

I . . .

I45.0

F_38.0

28.0

39.0

I 37.0

114

NameoffieldDisc. Depth,date ft

EXSPANIETA

KSATRIA‘ETRASANGA

I I

Tarakan I 1906 I

Juata 19261,278

-3,600

Mengatal I 1938I

1,050-5,250

Pamusian 1906[

213-2,772

Sanga-sangaI

Anggana I 1903I230

-2,772

Kutai LamaI 1938

‘1426

N. -5.637

Kutai Lama

I 1902I1,640

s. -2,953

=--+=+5Louise S. 1897

82-2,379

Maura I 1902I869

-2,297

==-1-=kSamboja I 1909I

65-4,387

‘reducingoilwell

275

1995 Prod.avg. b/d

5,0

.

9

—

APIgrav-Ry

19.0-20.5

+

19.0-32.0

18.0-19.0

+

19.0-20.0

25.0-29.0

i

27.0-33.0

25.0-30.0

i

25.0-30.0

25.0-29.0

+

25.0-30.0

25.0-29.0

427.0

-31.0

27.0-29.0

26.0

118.0

-27.0

115

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Prod.date ft oilwell

=H=--t--Lindai I 1971 I 1,100

ManggaI

1988I

7,800

Mengkapan I 1981 I 4,000

Minas 1944 2,600

Mindal 1971 3,400

Mutiara 1976 3,500

Nella 1977 5,000

%

Obor 1978 7,370

Osam 1978 900

Pager 1974 4,300

Paitan I 1978 I 2,315

1995 Prod.avg. ,b/d

APIgrav”m

29.0

20.9

32.0

35.0

42.0

35.0

32.0

.. .

33.0

34.0

44.0

35.0

37.0

34.0

35.0

40.0

32.0

38.0

32.0

116

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producingdate ft oilwell

Pak I 1988 I 3,667

Pedada I 1973 I 950

Pelita I 1977 I 6,600

PematangI

1959I

3,750

Pemburu I 1981 I 2,300\

Perkebunan I 1977 I 2,300

Petani I 1964 I 4,7501 1

PetapahanI

1971I

4,500

Pinang I 1971 \ 3,9501

Pinggir I 1972I 3,300

PuduI

1972I

5,950

=i-=-kdPungut

I1951

I3,400

Pusaka 1977 2,250

Rangau 1968 6,100

Rantau Bais 1972 1,070

117

—I 1 I

Nameof f ieldDisc. Depth, Producingdate ft oilwell

<intis I 1984I 6,450

Sabak I 1974 I 2,350

Sebanga . ..

Seruni 1972 3,000

Sidingin ...

3ikladi I 1975I 4,340

Singa I 1977I 3,200

SintongI

1971I

3,900

Sintong SE . 1973 I...

ISuram I 1971 I 1,750

Tandun I 1969I 3,000

Tanggul . ..

TanjungMedan I 1976I 2,770

Tegar I I ... I

995 Prod. API

avg.,bld grav-m

39.7

.. .

36.0

...

...

35.0

.. .

40.0

31.0

L

32.0

36.0

28.0

33.0

...

34.0

...

118

I

I

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilwell avg. ,bld grav”w

Telinga 1975 4,205 33.0

Terantam 1973 900 32.0

Titian .. . .. .

Topas 1977 5,200 33.0

Topi 1979 3,630 37.0

Tunas 1983 4,819 35.0

Ubi 1976 4,350 35.0

Ujung Tanjung 1975 3,600 34.0

Waduk 1982 6,100 38.0

Zambrud 1975 3,600 40.0

Ahab 1951 600 36.0CITRA

PATENINDO Dews 1936 8,337 ... 1,393 ...N.P.

Raja 1950 600 38.0

Belida ~1989 5,000 28 113,233 47.0

Ikan Pari 19834,100-

CONOCO 4,500.. . 1,618 47.4

GROUPSembilang 1994 .. . 4 8,690 .. .

Udang 1974 5,595 .. . ... 39.0

EKSITAPATRANAGA Mamburungan 1989

5,020-5,131

2 125 . ..

RI

ENTERPRISE/GFB Camar 1970 4,350 2 1,736 ...

RESOURCES

119

—

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate R oilwell avg. ,b/d g rav “N

GENINDO Sembakung 1976 7:,956 .. . 2,709 35.0

‘GOLDON TanjungSPIKE Kurung

... 3 1,116 .. .

Belimbing 1965 5,371 35.5

Karangan 1975 5,250 23.0

Limau Barat 19283,898

HUSKY -4,626 .. . 5,622 .. .

Limau Niru 1954 5,118 .. .

Limau Timur 19283,898

-4,626.. .

JAPEX Arbey Selo ... 9 2,332 .. .—

KE-3/Camar 19704,178 36.6

-4,260 -37.0

Maciura KE-2 19783,370 45.5

KODECO-4,080

8 987 r-47.2

Madura1987

6,700 35.1

KE-23 -8,350 -45.0

Madura KE-5 ... .. .

iIEIKurau 19864,500

-9,00047.4

llIILalang 19803,100

-3,60039.6

900MALAKAAIT/ ❑ Melibur JS 1984

-1,30035.6

LASMO/ROL 89 20,889

EUM lEIMengkapan 19813,850

-4.,45042.0

❑ lMSBV 19934,500

-9,000...

lEISelatan 19873,900 ...

-4,500

120

MARATHON

MAXUS

ENERGY

lEIKakap KH 1980 6,350 7

EKakap KRA 1991 5,200 4

lEICinta / 1970 I 3,5001

EIDuma 1983 2,300

E Farida 1982 7,000

❑ lGita 1972 5,000

❑ llndri 1989 3,500

Elntan 1987 3,200

❑ lntan NE 1987 3,300

EIKamila 1983 4,650 316

EIKitty ‘1971 2,700

=-F-t-a❑ lRama 1974 3,200

ELSelatan 1978 2,800

iEISundari 1981 4,400

I@Witi 1981 6,100

--1---11995 Prod. APIavg., b/d gravity

1,397 43.0

=

8,122 50.5

16,194 45.0

*

34.0

16.0

32.0

33.0

34.2

32.0

32.6

126,863 36.0

18.0

37.0

29.0

31.0

20.0

25.0

33.0

121

f

Disc. Depth, Producing1995

Nameoffield Prod.AP 1

date fft oilwellavg.. b/d

grav “N

❑ lWanda 1982 4,800 36.0

❑NViduri 1988 3,500 24.0

EIYvonne 1880 5,000 36.0

lEIZelda 1971 6,300 32.2—

M08LE Arun(c) 1971 9,367 64 87,839 55.0—

Andan 1950 1,969 29.0

Blimbing 1952 4,922 .. .

Link 1939 1,600 34.0P.LIRIK

... 1,470PETROLEUM N.pulai 1941 1,800 34.0

Sago 1940 1,800 34.0

S. Pulai 1941 1,800 34.0—

PT. SURYA7AYA TELADAN ‘enakat

1932 4,167 ... 1,573 35.0—

Binio 1952 1,600 14 132 34.0

Gemuruh 1983 2,800 17 496 34.0

KayuaraEast

1983 3,500 46 1,610 35.0

PT. EXSPANSUMATERA Kayuara 1982 3,700 5 128 35.0CENTRAL

SUMATERA Kerumutan 1980 3,000 10 317 35.0

MerbauNorth

1980 2,600 4 31 36.0

Merbau 1979 2,700 21 699 36.0

1

122

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilweli avg., b/d grav”o

Mutiara 1985 2,700 1 5 34.0

Panduk 1981 2,500 6 109 46.0

,.Parum 1987 4,200 17 693 35.0

Pekan 1976 3,700 12 135 35.0

GunungKembang 1987 3,600 4 986 36.0

Ibul 1970 5,700 3 89 36.0

Jene 1985 6,500 28 5,372 35.0

Kerang 1984 2,900 2 76 35.0

Lagan 1986 2,400 5 134 56.8

PT. EXSPAN Langkap 1987 2,900 11 581 34.0

SUMATERASOUTH Pian 1986 6,000 1 74 36.0

SUMATERARambutan 1972 4,500 6 2 42.0

Rimbabat 1984 3,200 .. . . .. 34.0

South Tabuan 1981 2,200 ... . .. 34.0

Tabuan 1986 4,000 6 390 34.0

Teras 1976 4,500 3 24 42.0

Besitang 1977 3,973 51.5

PERTIMINA GebangUEP I

1977 2,917 188 5,319 54.0

Kuala Dalam 1983 3,872 50.8

123

Nameoffield

+

1995Prod. APIavg. ,b/d grav”m

45.0

45.0

Disc.date

1971

3epth,ft

3,740-5.019

Producingoilwell

K.SimpangRarat

K.SimpangTimur

P.TabuhanBarat

P.TabuhanTimur

1967 3,576

3,350-5.893

2,460 1=50.8

50.8

1937

1968

PulauPaniana

Rantau

1928

1929

3,300

2,764 1----...

45.3

t---

47.5

. ..

Serang Jaya

Securai

1926

1980

3,701

4,100-6.890——

3,701SungalBuluh

51.01984

Air SerdangI

.<1988 4,860 ,.

3,822–3.775——

4,167

I 25.7Bajubang 1930

1973BenakatEast I 35.0

8etung 1966 4,003 I . ..

379

BetangJamhi

1951 328

F...

7,997

. ..

.. .

UEP IICandi

Deras

1937

1937

8,012

6,618

Jirak

Kenali Asam

1930

1931

2,093

2,077t-

.. .

29.0

KetalingTimur

1985 1,837—. I ...

NameoffieldDisc. Depth,

date ft

Kruh N. I 1935 I 4,652

Molek I 1956 I 2,600

Musi I 1985 I 2,717

Setiti I 1960 \ 1,837I I

Sukaraja I 1934 I 7,379

Sungai Lilin I 1964I 2,690

Talang Akari

19226,562

–R.681

Talang Jimar I 1937 I 4,123

Tempino I 1931I

1,647

Ukui/PondokI

19501,378

-1,641

Banyubang I 1980I 1,312

Cemara 19763,964

-7.104

Kandang Haui ,979Tim) v

7,54E

Kawengan 19261,60C

PERTIMINA -7.675

UEP IllLedok 1893 1,38C

I,

I

I MB STR I 1985 I1O,4O(I I I

Pegaden I 1986 I 6,89(I I 1

Producingoilwell

18[

125

—

Nameoff ieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilwell avg. ,b/d grav-~

Randegan 1973 5,578 . ..

Tigu Barat 1979 3,014 . ..—

Bangkadulia 1960 3,250 39.5

Dahor1966 3,610

Selatan. ..

Kambilin 1981 3,491 . ..

Sangkinah4,265-4,539

...

PERTIMINASangatta 1939 2,600 33.0

UEP77 2,934

Tanjung 1938 .. . 39.9

Tanta 1975 6,660 ...

Tapa-Teritip 1975 4,396 . ..

Tapian Timur 1967 2,067 38.8

Warukin 1966 3,250 26.9

Kiamono 1936 574 19.0

I’ERTIMINALinda 1977 3,281 19.0

UEP V98 1,629

Sele 1951 2,156 35.0

Wiriagar 1984 3,500 39.7—

PETROMER Arar Gas (c) 1977 50.0

TFIEND/SANTAFE ENERGY

Cenderawasih 1976 281 11,191 26.7

‘EsOuRcEs Jaya 1973 39.6—

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod- AP 1

date ft oilwe II avg. ,b/d 9 rav ‘W

Kasim 1972 36.5

Kasim Barat 1975 34.5

Kasim Utara 1973 25.7

Kasuari ...

Klagagi ..

Klalin 1990 43.5

Klalin (c) 1986 55.0

Klaserai 1981 . ..

Lao-lao ...

Maniwar . ..

Moi 1979 16.2

Walio Kais 1973 2,337 34.3

Walio Text II 1973 2,268 34.3

Walio ‘U’ ‘ 1975 2,284 34.3

West Klagagi ... . ..

‘ETRONusA Selat Panjang 1994 . .. 1RI IMI RHAKTI

203 . ..

SANTA FE Salawati 1992 ... 18 7,377 34.0

SANTOSIAGL Bula,897 280-1,

30088 900 23.0

SIDHAKARYA Sabaku 1977 . ..

PILONA191 - ...

Salawati 1977 5,500 ... . ..

127

—

NameoffieldDisc.date

Depth,ft

——100

-800

Producingoilwell

1995 Prod. APIavg. ,b/d 9 rav ity

1---46.0

-52.0

46.0

Batu Keras 1903

Kampung

Minyak100

-500—.300

-800

300-1,000

—.4,600

-15,600

1896

1905

1904

1972

t----

-52.0858

46.0TRITON 74

Suban Jeriji

----l=-52.0

46.0-52.0

Sungai

Taham

lEIBekapai I 40.0

i

2,900-19,200

8,850-10,158

244

lEIHandil

Semanlu

1974

1990

I33.0

62,348r

30.8-32.7

TOTAL

INDONESIEt

48,000

-13.000

8,001-13,000

f@Tambora 1984I

33.0

I

I 55.0Tunu(c) 1985

1,.200-11,000 117

3,100-7,100

6

2,900-4,900

5

3,400-11,600

32

45,90832,0

-42.0❑ lAttaka 1970

1970lEIKerindinga

43320.0

-36.0n

1,84716.0

-29.0lEIMelahin ,

EISepinggan

1972

11,03125.0

-38.01972

UNOCAL n6,000

-10,00017

670-2,235

e

2,’180 ~-6,600

27,51740.0

-42.0lEISerang 1973

79013.0

-22.5EIYakin C.

❑ lYakin N.

1976

1977 1,97916.2

-28.9

2,050-2,530

60018.4

-21.1❑Yakin W. 1982

128

Nameoffield Disc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. AP 1date ft oilwe II avg. ,b/d grav”@

JSTRAINDO Benuang 1942 6,103 . .. 7,352 35.1

Beringin 1975 6,365 3%.8-6.925

Burrya Nibung 1926 5,315 33.2

Gunung Kemala 1938 5,548 38.0

Jatibarang 1969 7,136 29.0/Karana AmcIel

Kuang 1940 5,249 25.1

Ogan Timur 1943 3,898 .. .-4.626

Prabumulih 1953 5,315 .. .Barat

Tanjung Miring 1935 3,511 .. .

Tanjung Tiga 1938 3,750 28.0

VIRGINA Badak 1972 4,350 365 49,903 34.4INDONESIA -12.600

Lampake 1981 7,000 .. .

-9.000

Mutiara 1984 1,500 38.5

-8.500

Nilam 1974 7,300 33.4-14,700

Pamaguan 1974 5oo- 26.8

6.000

Semberah 1974 2,000- 30.08.500

Wailawi(c) 1974 2,600- 32.0

4,800

TOTALNDONESIA

8,504 1,521,469


Source :International Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997 / PennWell Pblishing Co.

129

Japan—

Nameoff ieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilwell avg., bfd grav”m

EEIAga-Oki 1972 7,590 2 612 24.8

Higashi–Niigata,965 4,500-9

,2003 1,577 53.9

❑ llwafune-Oki,984 5,050-8 ~

,6606,734 .. .

Katakai ‘ ’60 3,310-1 0 496 50.0

JAPEX-----

Sarukawa,958 2,000-3 43

,200695 32.3

Yoshii 1968 8,000 0 687 61.8

Yurihara,976 1,310-7

,6105 331 43.5

Other .,,. 39 767 .. .

Higasaki-Kashiwazaki ‘ ’70 6,000-8 6 421 62.0

. . .

Kubiki,959 1,100-6 60

,400417 29.7

rEIKOKUCIIL Minami-Aga

,964 7,300-9 g

,600491 38.5

CO.LTD

Minami-Nagaoka,984 13,200-

15,1009 888 55.7

Yabase,933 1,100-5 48

,800316 33.0

—

Total Japan 229 14,432

—

El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)EstimatedSource :International Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997/ PennWell publishing Co.

‘reducingoilwell

Disc. Depth,date ft

Nameoffield

1976 I 5,500lEIBekok I 47.0I r 44.0lEIGunton

1979 3,300

1979 6,000

I

!31ron barat I 35.0

r 47.0❑ Kepong

❑ lPalas 1979 6,300

1973 4,300

1971 4,300

1980 3,700

1978 5,600

1975 6,700

I 49.0

r 42.3❑ PulaiESSO

MALAYSIA r 50.0

780

lEISeligi

k42.5

44.0

❑ lSemangkok

❑ lTabu

❑ lTapis650,000

L

45.0

=

1980 4,400

1978 5,800

1971 6,000

ETinggi

❑ lTiong

❑EITembungo k48.0

47.0

40.0PETRONASCARIGALI

+

1971 6,785

1972 5,700

LEIErb WEST I 30.0SABAHSHELL

PETROLEUM

(SSPC)

SABAHSHELL

E3ERHAD(SSPC)

EISamarangI

37.0

1975 2,200

1976 4,200

1981 4,000

1972 3,100

i@lSt. Joseoh

❑ lBayan

I32.0

L-37,3

❑ ID-18

❑ lTemanaI

35.0

131

Name off ieldDisc. oepth, Producing 1995 Prod. AP 1date ft oilwell avg. .bld grav W.

@lBakau .,. .

@lBaram ....

lElE3aronia 1967 “7,900 42.0

I@Betty 1967 7,900 38.0SARAWAKSHELL /

R BokorPETRONAS

1972 2,000 35.0

CARl GALl ❑ lFairleyBaram

1973 8,655 39.5

❑ lSiwa 1973 4,100 25.0

❑ lTukau 1966 5,000 39.2

@iWest Iutong . .. . 39.5

Total Malaysia 780 650,000

—

El Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)EstimatedSource :Intemational Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997/ PennWell Publishing Co.

132

Mexico

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilwell avg. ,b/d grav”w

Abkatun 1978 11,800 4,740 246,560 28.7

Bacab 1991 ... . 6,980 17.7’

Batab 1986 .... 5,565 33.6

Caan 1985 ... . 166,471 38.5

Cantarell 1976 8,528 905,568 19.9,

Chat 1994 55,510 18.0 ~~

Chuc 1982 13,100MARINE

112,452 12.6 ~

REGION Ek1991 . .. . 1,598 28.0

Ixtoc 1974 . .. . 9,038 29.3

Ku 1979 10,000 192,931 20.9

Pol 1979 12,600 120,497 32.4

Taratunich 1990 . ... 64,012 24.5

Other . .. . 50,261 26.2

Other (c) . .. . 87,825 ....

Acuatempa 1995 4,085 332 20.3

Agua Fria 1978 ... . 4,187 44.8

NORTHERN Angostura 1954 ... . 1,000 14.2

REGION

Arenque 1970 11,362 6,516 34.5

Atun 1966 9,040 587 37.6

Nameoffield IDisc. Depth,date ft

Producing 1995 Prod.oilwe II avg. ,b/d

APIgravity

I 1,407Bagre I 1973 I 10,919 33.3

=$=-l-= 1---1,662

7,463

20.9

17.3

Copite I1975 . ...

E303

3,482

2,011

215

34.3

Escolin 1942 I 7,216 26.6

+

1955 10,170

1963 6,8”75—

1958 7,390

Haliazgo

Isla de Lobos

29.0

39.8

I 1,305 35.8Jillapa

516Marsopa 1974 10,198

Matapionche 1974 11,129

Mecatepec 1941 7,544

20.0

t-----

534

1,557

35.9

30.2

30.1Miquetia 1959 6,480—

Muro 1965 3,966—

Ocotepec 1953 3,737

I 881

1-----377

333

16.6

21.2

E1,291

6,048

16.2

11.7

I 8,600Poza Rica I 1930 ! 17,090

+

24.0

29.8

30.7

R1,47s

624

6,70S 28.6San Andrez I 1956 I 10,4IC

134

Name of fieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. APIdate ft oilwell avg. ,b/d g rav ‘ity

Santa

Agueda1953 4,780

ETamaulipas I 1956 4,200

Tres

Hermanos I 19596,960

Other . ...I

19,551 27.4

E620

755

6,334

10ther I II .... .. ..

Agata I 1966 3,830 32.6

41.3

41.0

29.1

33.0

Agave I 1977 13,450

k1,524

137Ayapa

Bacal I 1976 I 3,500 I 2,176

r=Bellota I 1982 17,056 37.1

Blasillo I 1967 7,216 1------4,245

8,581

41.9

44.3SOUTHERN Cactus

I 1972 14,100

r= 38.5CaparrosoI

1982 ....

Cardenas I 1979 17,548 I 33,633 37.7

I 2,789Carmito 1980 10,050

Carrizo 1962 3,500

Chiapas 1979 12,136

46.3

E 18.1

45.4I

566

Cinco1960 6,862

presidents I 6,205 36.1

135

Name of f ieldDisc. Depth,date ft

—

Comoapa 1979 14,432

Conception 1974 1,600

Copano 1977 11,890

Cuichapa 1935 2,200

Cunduacan I 1974 13,775

*-

Eden 1983 17,590—

El Burro 1931 2,200

El Golpe 1963 3,500

El Plan 1931 1,“700

Fenix 1979 17,876

Fortuna

Nacionai1927 . ...

Gira!das 1977 15,225

=--+=+=

Ixhuatian

Oriente1965 . .. .

Jacinto 1987 ... .

Jolote 1983 18,119

Jose Colomo 1951 ... .

Jujo I 1980 17,548

136

Producing I 1995 Prod. I APIoiiwe[i I avg., b/d I arav-~ I

2,002 37.4

623 33.8

8,476 47.3

3,829 30.8

18,954 35.1

8,382 38.7

392 35.0

2.519 33.9

292 29.7

2.648 36.9

176 52.9

4<900 40.0

28.129 28.8

136 44.6

552 16.1

17.962 43.1

25.071 37.7

12 35.9

75.924 35.4

.

TDisc. Depth,Nameoffield date ft

La Venta 1954 ‘4,730

Lacamango 1973 1,700

Los Soldados 1953 4,492

Luna 1987 ... .

Moloacan 1962 ....

Mora 1981 . ...

Mundo Nuevo 1977 11,800

Oaxiacaque I 1977 11,150

Ogarrio I 1957 5,790

Otates I 1965 7,469

Rio Nuevo I 1975 I 14,950

Rodador I 1971 ....

Samaria

(Cret.)1973 ....

Samaria

(Terc.)1965 4,920

San Ramon I1967 9,515

Producinooilwe II

+-i-=

*

1.557 17.6

11.358 38.2

1.323 54.2

*

12.559 53.7

3.928 38.0

4.205 28.0

6.1841 33.3

*

713 37”.5

8.028 39.7

3.432 38.0

*

1.100 35.7

61.146 29.3

733 28.5

2.393 I 31.8

—

NameoffieldDisc. Depth, Producing 1995 Prod. API

date ft oilwell. avg. ,b/d gravity

Santa Rosa 1952 .... 118 23.0

Santurario 1966 9,617 2.249 42.1

Sen 1986 . ... 35.105 41.3

Sitio Grande 1972 13,766 7.616 33.5

Sunuapa 1976 12,877 252 30.3

S. Magallanes 1957 4,240 4.008 33.3

Tecominoacan 1982 19,519 45.332 40.6

Tintal 1968 5,C]04 326 26.9

Tonala 1928 1, ;770 747 33.4

Topen 1978 11,172 344 27.9

TuPilco 1959 9,685 929 38.5

Vernet 1954 .... 279 43.8

Other . ... 49.475 42.9

Other . ... 16.485 ....—

TotallMexico

4,740 2,722,129—


Source :International Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997 /PennWell Publishing Co.

138

New Zealand

Nameoffield Disco. Depth,date ft

FLETCHER Ahuroa (c) 1987 8,688CHALLENGE Kaimiro 1982 11,900

Mckee 1980 7,848-8,251

Tariki 1986 9,065

Waihapa 1986 10,125-10,643

NEW ZEALAND Ngatoro!

1992 . .. .OIL & GAS

SHELLIBPITODD Kapuni (c) 1959 11,700

lEIMaui 1969 11,000

El Ofhhm , (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

10 815 42.0

25 6,150 38.5

0 0 52.7

6 3,165 36.6

2 627 35.0

121 3,390 I 54.0

15/ 18,866 I 51.0

0 0 ....

Source :Intemational Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997/ PennWellpublishing CO.

139

Papua New Guinea

Nameoffieid Disco. Depth Prod. 1995Prod. API

date oilwell avg., bld grav”@k

CHEVRON AQOQO 1989 4,200 8 11,430 44.0

-5,400

Lagifu/Hedinia 1986 7,400 21 88,142 45.0

-8,500

Total 29 99,572

PapuanewGuinea

El Offsllme, (c)Condenstate, (c)EstimatedSource :InternationalPetroleum Encyclopedia 1997/ PennWell

publishing co.

140

Peru

Name of field Disco. Depth, Prod. 1995 Prod. API

date ft oil well avg. , bfd grav-ky

GMP SA I Lote I 1869 2,000 69 756 33.0

(Block) -9,000

Lote V 1869 2,000 33 225 35.0

(Block) -9,000

MAPLE GAS [Agua [ 1939 I 1,000[ 171 161 I 40.0

Caliente -1,500

Maquia 1957 2,100 28 515 37.0

-2,400 [

OCCIDENTAL Bartra 1979 8,000 11 3,438 11.6

-8,930

Capahuarj 1988 12,000 6 5,443 31.0

Norte -13,500

Capahuarj 1973 11,800 16 4,677 33.7

Sur -12,900

Carmen 1986 10,680 1 374 18.4

Dorissa 1989 9,800 10 6,249 32.0

-10,600

Forestal 1973 9,000 8 3,650 18.5

-9,000

Huayuri Sur I 1977 I 10,000 11 2,529 28.5 I

-10,800

Jibarito 1981 9,000 7 8,765 10.5

-9,650

Jibario 1974 10,110 6 2,596 10.6

-10,155

San Jacinto 1978 7,200 19 7,326 14.9

-9,760

Shiviyacu 1973 9,100 21 9,314 20.3

I /-10,100/ I I I

—Name of field Disco.

fiCIDENTAL

/ BRIDAS

—

I

+

Cruz II 1978

Folche I 1978

Folche Norte 1978

Organos SurI

1978

Patriai

1978

Zapotal 1978

Depth, Prod. 1995 Prod.

ft oil well avg. , bld

1,343 111 517

-6,080

1,343 286 1,247

-6,080

1,343 6 26

-6,080

1,343 13 68

-6,080

1,343 14 54

-6,080

1,343 6 27

-6,080

1,34’3 64 I 208

-6,080

1,343 82 428

-6,080

1,343 48 93

-6.080

1,343 95 526

-6,080

1“,343 235 1,099

-6,080

API

grav-Ry

35.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

35.0

35. c

35.C

142

Name of field Disco. Depth, Prod. 1995 Prod. API

PETROPERU

- LOTE X

PETROPERU

- LOTE 8

date ft oil well avg. , b!d gravity

Ballena 1924 3,500 1,242 1,214 30.0-5,000

Carrizo 1953 4,000 963 31.0-5,500

Central ... . 273 ....

Coyonitas . .. . 79 ..,.

La Tuna . .. . 326 .. ..

Laguna .. .. 1,306 ....

Laguna 1953 7,000 992 29.0

Zapotal -8,000

Merina . .. . 823 .. ..

Organos 1947 6,000 227 30.0-7,000

Patria . ... 73 ....

Pena 1914 4,000 1,010 35.5Negra -5,000

Reventone . .. . 2,050 .. ..

s

Somatito .,. . 380 .. ..

Taiman 1922 3,000 2,739 30.0-6,500

Tunal . ... 61 .. ..

Verde . ... 550 ....

Capirona 1978 9,800 3 225 25.0-12,000

Chambira 1994 12,600 3 715 26.5-14,600

Corrientes 1974 10,000 31 10,024 24.9-12,600 ‘

PavayacuI

1978I

9,600 22 14,926 36.0-11.300

Yavayacu 1977 11,400 5 986 18.8-13,600

143

Name of field Disco. Depth,

ft

1,500

-6,000

Prod.

oil well

i-

1995 Prod. API

avg. , b/d grav”m

1,277 36.0

-40.0

PETRO -TECH 79

3,500

-7,500

193 10,099/ 38.0

I

lli10r9anos

t

.. .. 38.0

6,767 38.0

... .

3,000

-8,500

0

. .. .

214

53

❑ iPena Negra I 1960

lEIProvidencia 1967 3,000

-7,000

1,275 38.0

-40.0

PROVISA I

MERCANTILE

‘RIO BRAVO

Lote Ill 1869

(Block)

2,000

-9,000

60

72Lote IV 1869

(Block)

2,000-9,000

SAPET

DEVELOPMENT

Lote VII 265

260 --1-1,562 33.0

982 36.0

.. ..

3,000

(Block) ILJNIPETRO

ABC

Lote IX 1869

(Block)

2,000

-9,000

51 418 32.0

VEGSA Lote II I 1869 2,000

-9,000

107

3.883

t

Total Peru

(c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

Source :Intemational Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997 / PennWell

publishing co.

144

Philippines (e)

Name of field \ Disco. I Depth, I Prod. I 1995 Prod. I API I

ALCORN

PALAWAN

ALCORN

‘HII-IPPINES

SHELL /

OXY

Total

Philippines

date ft oil well avg. . bld g rav-lty

Cadlao 1977 5,734 0 2,900 45.6

-5,881

South Tara 1977 4,335 0 40.4

-4,436

Galoc 1981 7,260 0 37.2

-7,280

Matinloc 1978 6,656 4 43.8

-6,750

Nido 1977 6,576 4 27.2

-6,885

North 1987 6,830 0 43.2

Matinloc -7,021

West 1990 7,025 3 32.3

Linapacan -8,140

lEICamago 1989 11,167 0 48.7

lEIMalampaya 1992 11,648 0 29.0

-12,343

11 2,900


Source :Intemational Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997

publishing co.

/ PennWell

145

Chinese Taipei

Name of field ‘ Disc. Depth, Prod. 1995 Prod. API

date ft oil well avg. , bld 9ravity

CHINESE Chingtsohu & 1967 5,346 7 207 50.0

PETROLEUM CBK -’12,000

Chinshui & 1971 5,248 19 55 45.0

Yunghoshan -12,000

Chuhuangkeng 1904 6,560 29 174 50.0

-15,600

Tiechengshan 1962 9,840 16 597 51.0

Other 6,560 6 4 .,. .

-8,800

Total 77 1,037

Chinese

Taipei—


Source :Intemational Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997 / PennWell

publishing co.

146

Thailand

Name of field Disco. Depth. Prod. 1995 Prod. API

date ft oil well avg. , bld grav”@

CAIRN Wichan Buri 1988 3,526 1 244 26.6

ENERGY FAR

EAST LTD.

PTTEP Kamphaeng 1986 3,780 1 80 25.2

INTERNATION Saen

AL U Thong 1987 3,550 5 1,200 33.2

SINO-U.S. Bung Ya 1984 7,800 1 59 34.5

PETROLEUM Bung Nang 1987 8,900 6 203 35.8

THAI SHELL Nang Nuan 1987 9,000 1 3,086 40.0Sirikit 1981 5,500 97 17,643 41.0

TOTAL l@Bongkot 1973 7,000 29 3,760 56.0UNOCAL ❑ lBaanpot 1974 7,000 5 160 54.6

EEIErawan 1972 7,000 93 8,298 54.6

lEIFunan 1981 6,100 60 4,425 45.0

❑ IGomin 1988 7,300 7 1,405 47.0

❑ llJakrawan 1976 6,500 9 547 45.1

❑ lKaphong 1973 8,000 4 320 55.0

❑ lPlatong 1976 8,500 11 2,144 59.1

HSatun 1980 8,500 32 6,913 55.1

l@Surat 1971 6,800 3 411 50.0

Total 365 50,898

Thailand

•l Offshore, (c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

Source : International Petroleum Encyclopedia 1997 /

PennWell publishing co.

147

U.S. AFor your convenience the publication can be viewed or download by

section.

Oil and Gas Field Code

oil and gas field names

(1 Ok to 772k)

Master List 1996: Comprehensive listing of U.S.

as of October 1996. Presented in 37 PDF files.

SectionNameandFi\e Size

Chimers (266K, 31 pages)

Includes Cover Page, Preface, Contents, Chapters, and the Glossary.

M- (290K, 8 pages)

States and areas having subdivisions are shown with their subdivisions.

~ous States (30K, 2 pages)

Field code information for all fields located in the States of Alaska,

Arizona, Florida, Iowa, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, Oregon,

South Dakota, Virginia, and

Alabama (39K, 2 pages)

Field code information for

Arkansas (47K, 3 pages)


~tiomia (46K, 3 pages)


coIorado (90K, 7 pages)


Ulinois (1 19K, 6 pages)


Washington.

all fields located in this State.

all fields !ocated in this State.


all fields located in this State,


148

Indiana (95K, 5 pages)


Kansas (645K, 38 pages)


Kentucky (238K, 12 pages)


Louisiana (180K, 11 pages)


Michkan (139K, 9 pages)


Mississiuui (61 K, 5 pages)


Montana (49K, 3 pages)


Nebraska (59K, 4 pages)


New Mexico (92K, 7 pages)


New York (42K, 2 pages)


al I

al I

all

all

all

all

al I

all

,all

all

North Dakota (37K, 3 pages)

Field code information

~ (162K, 8 pages)

Field code information

for all

for all

fields located in this State.










fields located in this State,


149

Oklahoma (772K, 35 pages)

Field code information for all fields located in this State.

PeJlnw lvania (79K, 5 pages)


Tennessee (24K, 2 pages)


Texas A-F (471 K, 33 pages)

Field code information for all

names beginning with A through

Texas G-M (459K, 32 pages)


names beginning with G through

Texas N-Z (488K, 35 pages)


names beginning with N through

~@ (34K, 2 pages)

fields located in this State with field

F.


M.


z.


WestVirginia (94K, 5 pages)


Wyoming (135K, 8 pages)


Federal Offshore - California and Other Gulf (16K, 1 page)

Field code information for all fields located in this area,

Federal Offshore - Louisiana (385K, 15 pages)

Field code information for all fields located in this area.

150

Federal Offshore - Texas (1 10K, 5 pages)

Field code information for all fields located in this area,

Index Partl (36K, 29 pages)

Field name and State or area for field code numbers 000100 through

012999.

Index Part 2 (36K, 31 pages)

Field name and State or area for field code numbers O

249985.

3000 through

kdex Part 3 (35K, 31 pages)


559969.

Index Part 4 (34K, 30 pages)


951068.

Invalid List (1 OK, 1 page)

Field code information by State for invalid field names plus reason

are invalid.

source : URL: http: //www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/natgas/fcml96.html

they

151

Vietnam

Name of field

PETROVIETN

AM P.I.C.

—Total

V-kNnam

❑ lWhire

Tiger

(Bach Ho)

❑ Rong

(Ora90n)

tEIDi Hung

Disc.

date

198

1983

1985

Depth,

ft

120

-160

T20

120 177,0004

-’160I

=a--4--28 177.000

(c)Condenstate, (c)Estimated

Source : International Petroleum

publishing CO.

Encyclopedia 1997 / PennWell

152

MI

grav”m

34.C

34.(

34.C

World Total

Country 1000 million barrel Rat io RIP

OECD 96.9 9.3% 13.1

OPEC 797.1 76.8% 75.2

NON-OPEC 175.2 16.9% 14.4

APEC (163.0) (15.7%) (60.0)

WorldTotal 141 “43 100.0% 62.2

SOUrCe: ~~~q 1998 (fJ~}&l~~~)

C.I.S.

Country 1000 million barrel Ratio RIP

Azerbaijan 7.0 0.7 ●

Kazakhstan 8.0 0.8 42.5

Russia 48.6 4.7 22.7

Uzbekistan 0.6 0.1 8.0

Etc. 1.2 0.1 15.4

Total 65.4 6.4% 24.7

Source : 4%9!Y 1998 (Ui24%~3iJ)

~ : under 0.05 * : over 100 years

North America

Country 1000 million barrel Ratio R/P

U.S.A 29.8 2.9% 9.8

Canada 6.8 0.7% 9.2

Mexico 40.0 3.8% 33.6

!NofihAmerica 76,6 7.4% 16.0—

Asia & Oceania

Country 1000 million barrel Ratio RIP

Australia 1.8 0.2% 8.0

Brunei 1.4 0.1% 23.3

China 24.0 2.3% 20.5

India 4.3 0.4% 15.6

Indonesia 5.0 0.5% 9.0

Malaysia 3.9 0.4% 15.1

Papua New Guinea 0.3 * 11.7

Vietnam 0.6 0.1% 8.5

etc 1.0 1.0% 11.3

Asia&Ocean ian 42.3 4.1% 15.6

Source : 4%2!= 1996 (Ui#i}4$?El?!l)

T : under 0.05 * : over 100 years

154

Mica

Country I 1000 million barrel I Rat io I R/P

I Algeria I 9.2 I 0.9% I 18.8

I Angola I 5.4 \ 0.5% I 20.3

I Cameroon I 0.4 I 8.8% I 8.8

Congo 1.5 16.4% 16.4

Egypt 3.8 0.4% 12.2

Gabon 2.5 0.2% 18.5

Tunisia 0.3 T 9.4

I Libya I 29.5 I 2.8% I 55.6

I Nigeria I 16.8

I etc I 0.6 \ 0.1% I 12.3

I Africa I 70.0 I 6.7% ] 25.0

Europe

I Country I 1000 million barrel I Rat io I RIP I

I Denmark 0,9 0.1% 10.31

Italy 0.7 0.1% 17.5

Norway 10.4 1.0% 8.6

Rumania 1.6 0.1% 32.5

England 5.0 0.5% 5.2

Etc 1.6 0.1% 11.6

Europe 20.2 1.9% 8.2

Source : 4%$?Y 1998 (CH24%=31)

155

Central & South America

Country 1000 mill”mn barrel Rat io R/P

Argentina 2.6 0.2% 8.5

Brazil 4.8 0.5% 15.5

Colombia 2.8 0.3% 11.7

Ecuador 2.1 0.2% 14.8

Peru 0.8 0.1% 18.5

Trinidad and tobago 0.6 t 12.6

Venezuela 71.7 6,9% 59.5

Etc. 0.8 0.1% 21.7

Central& SouthAmerica 86.2 8.3% 37.3

Source : 4%$?Y 1998 (CHiZ~4%~El)

T : under 0.05 * : over 100year

Middle East

Country 1000 million barrel Rat io R/P

Iran 93.0 9.0% 69.0

Iraq 112.5 10.8% *

Kuwait 96.5 9.3% *

Oman 5.2 0.5% 15.8

Catarrh 3.7 0.4% 15.1

Saudi Arabia 261.5 25.2% 79.5

Syria 2.5 0. 2% 12.0

U.A. E 97.8 9.4% *

Yemen 4.0 0.4% 28.9

Etc 0.2 0.2% 12.2

M idd leEast 676.9 65.2% 87.7

Source : q%!?!~ 1998 (UIF24$%?43V)

T : underO.05 * : over 100yearn

156

Word Totalunit [lOWB/D)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

OECD 19550 19660 20550 20745 21375 29.9%

OPEC 26070 26850 27190 27515 28225 40.5%

Non OPEC 30530 30985 32345 33120 34295 49.0%

WordTotal 65750 66010 66950 67850 69685 100%

“ &!%gY 1997 (f2ii2A!%Fm)Source .

C.I.S.unit(lWOS/D)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

Azerbaijan 225 210 195 185 185 0.3%

Kazakhstan 550 490 435 440 480 0.7%

Russia 8035 7155 6420 6205 6075 9.0%

Uzbekistan 80 95 125 165 165 0.2%

Etc. 225 230 225 220 255 0.4%

C.1.s 9145 8180 7400 7215 7160 10.5%

Source : 4%E551 1997 (Eli~t4$?~l!l)

North Americaunit(1COcJwo)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

U.S.A 8870 8585 8390 8320 8300 11.4%

Canada 2060 2185 2275 2400 2460 3.4%

Mexico 3120 3130 3140 3065 3280 4.9%

NorthAmerioa 14050 13900 13805 13785 14040 1g.i%o

Source : 4%9?Y 1997 (Uli24%~3J)

157

Asia & Oceaniaunit(IOOWD)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 \ 1996 Ratio ( 96)

Australia I 600 I 565 I 610 I 585 I 615 ] 0.8% IBrunei 0.2% IChina I 2840 I 2890 \ 2930 I 2990 I 3170 I 4.7% IIndia 1.0% I

Indonesia I 1580 I 1590 I 1590 I 1580 I 1640 I 2.3% IMalaysia I 670 I 660 I 675 I 725 I 725 I 1.0% I

Papua New Guineal 55 I 125 I 120 I 100 I 105 I 0.1% IVietnam I 110 I 125 I 140 I 150 I 170 I 0.3% I

etc I 240 \ 240 I 230 I 220 I 225 I 0.3% I

Asia&Oceanian I 6915 I 6990 I 7180 I 7315 I 7560 \ 10.8% ISource : 4%2!Y 1997 (CJlP!+%i21~)

Afkicaunit (IOOOEVO)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (96)

Algeria 1320 1325 1310 1325 1395 1.8%

Angola 535 505 530 615 710 1.0%

Cameroon 135 130 115 105 100 0.2%

Congo 175’ 190 195 185 230 0.3%

Egypt 910 945 930 930 900 1.3%

Gabon 290 305 335 355 360 0.5%

Libya 1475 1400 1430 1440 1440 2.1%

Nigeria 1950 1985 1990 2000 2150 3.2%

Tunisia 110 100 100 90 90 0,1%

etc 30 40 40 60 110 0.2%

Africa 6930 6925 6975 7105 7485 10.7%

158

Ehropeuni (1OXIWD)

7

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (’96)

Denmark 160 170 190 190 215 0.3%

Italy 85 90 95 100 105 0.0%

Norway 2265 2430 2765 2965 3315 4.6%

Rumania 140 140 140 140 140 0.2%

England 1975 2115 2680 2755 2735 3.9%

Etc 490 460 480 440 415 0.6%

Europe 5115 5405 6350 6590 6925 9.8%

Central & South Americaunit(laxwo)

I Country I 1992 I 1993 \ 1994 I 1995 I 1996 I Ratio(!36)

I Argentina I 585 \ 630 \ 695 I 750 I 805 \ 1.2%

I Brazil I 645 I 655 I 680 I 705 I 800 I 1.2%

I Colombia 14401460146015901635/ 1.0%

I Ecuador I 330 I ’355 1 390 I 395 \ 395 I 0.6%

Peru 115 125 130 125 120 0.2%

Trinidad andtobago

145 135 140 140 140 0.2%

I Venezuela / 2500 I 2590 I 2750 I 2960 I 3145 I 4.8%

Etc. I 75 I 80 I 90 I 95 I 100 I 0.1%

ICentral&South

America I 4835I

5030I

5335 I 5760 I 6140 I 9.3%

Country

Iran

Iraq—

Kuwait—

Oman

Catarrh

Saudi Arabia

Syria

U.A.E

Yemen

Etc

M idd Ie East

Middle EastUnt (1mowo)

1992 I 1993 \ 1994 I 1995 I 1996

3525 3700 3710 3715 3715

525 465 515 590 590

1095 1930 2095 2155 2155

750 785 815 895 895

495 I 460 I 450 ] 460 I 475

2510 I 2445 I 2460 I 2505 ] 2600

185 I 210 345 I 350 I 370

55155150 ]50150

18760 I 19580 I 19905 I 20080 i 20375

Ratio ( 96) I

5.5% I

0.9% I

43.2%

1.3%

O.6%

12.8% I0.9% I

3.5% I

0.5% I

0.1% I29.3% I

Source : 4%E!!Y 1997 (CJIZ}4$?=3J)

160

q. +lqi#

Word Totalunit (1000B/D)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

OECD 39605 39820 40830 40925 41775 59.6%

EU 12715 12630 12655 12800 13020 18.7’%

Developing Country 18250 19205 20325 21560 22550 32.6%

WordTotal 65975 65760 67065 68095 69545 100.0%

C.I.S.unit(lCQOBiD)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

Azerbaijan 160 165 165 170 170 0.3%

Belarus 425 280 255 245 245 0.4%

Kazakhstan 405 315 245 240 225 0.3%

Russia 4495 3790 3265 2935 2565 3.9%

Turkmenistan 100 65 75 80 80 0.1%

Ukraine 855 500 400 380 345 0.5%

Uzbekistan 180 165 145 135 130 0.2%

Etc. 340 290 190 170 175 0.3%

c. 1.s 6960 5570 4740 4335 3935 6.0%

161

North Americaunk (1CDO@JO)

Countw 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (96)

U.S.A 16260 19470 16950 16950 17400 25.2%

Canada 1625 1680 1720 1665 1735 2.4%

Mexico 1545 1550 1685 1560 1605 2.2%

NorthAmerica 19430 19700 20355 20175 20740 29.8%

Asia & Oceaniaunit (mom)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( ‘!36)

Australia 680 720 755 780 785 1.1%

Bangladesh 40 45 45 45 50 0.1%

China 2660 2915 3145 3380 3615 5.2%

India 1285 1300 1400 1515 1630 2.4%

Indonesia 730 785 755 825 900 1.3%

Japan 5540 5455 5760 5805 5830 8.1%

Malaysia 295 330 370 380 395 0.6%

New Zealand 110 110 ’115 120 125 0.2%

Pakistan 250 270 290 300 340 0.5%

Philippines 280 290 305 345 360 0.5%

Singapore -400 425 495 515 510 0.8%

Korea 1520 1675 1840 2010 2145 3.1%

Taiwan 585 625 665 725 725 1.1%

Chinese Taipei 490 555 615 715 785 1.1%

etc 390 410 430 450 480 0.7%

Asia& Oceanian 15255 15910 17005 17910 18675 26.8%

Source : 4%2!92 1997 (Cll#4%F43!J)

162

Africaunit(l CCOB/0)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (’96)

Algeria 200 230 225 220 215 0.3%

Egypt 455 440 435 475 500 0.7%

South Africa 370 385 400 425 435 0.6%

etc 1020 1055 1100 1130 1170 1.7%

Africa 2045 2110 2160 2250 2320 3.3%

Central & South Axnericaunit(1IXOBID)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( !96)

Argentina 420 415 425 425 445 0.6%

Brazil 1330 1355 1420 1500 1600 2.2% i

Chile 160 175 190 210 225 0.3%

Colombia 235 245 255 265 275 0.4%

I Venezuela 143014301435/44514251 0.6%

I Etc. 1165 1205 1270 1320 1365 2.0%I b I 1 ,

Central&SouthAmerica

3740 , 3825 3995 4165 4335 6.1%

Source : 4%QIY 1997 (CliiX4%i2i31)

Middle East

unit(l COWD)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

Iran 1015 1060 1115 1220 1170 1.7%

Saudi Arabia 1095 1115 1160 1125 1160 1.6%U.A.E 325 335 330 335 335 0.5%

Etc 1105 1135 1190 1260 1295 1.9%M idd leEast 3540 3645 3795 3940 3960 5.7%

163

Europeunit(1fXIOWD)

—Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( ’96)

Austria 235 235 235 235 240 0.3%

Belgium/Luxembourg 560 545 555 545 595 0.9%

Bulgaria 110 115 120 125 135 0.2%

Czecho 140 140 140 155 155 0.2%

Denmark 185 195 210 215 235 0.3%

Finland 215 205 215 210 215 0.3%—

France 2010 1940 “1880 1895 1930 2.8%

Germany 2850 2905 2880 2880 2920 4.2%

Greece 330 340 345 360 375 0.6%

Hungary 170 160 170 160 145 0.2%.

Iceland 15 15 15 15 15 *

Ireland 105 105 115 120 120 0.2%

Italy 1925 1910 “1915 1975 1955 2.8%—

Holland 795 790 790 830 810 1.1%

Norway 195 210 210 210 230 0.3%

Poland 290 295 315 330 360 0.5%—

Portuggal 265 250 255 270 255 0.4%—

Rumania 26fl 240 225 275 280 0.4%

Slovakia 80 80 75 80 80 0.1%

Spain 1115 1080 1120 1175 1220 1.8%

Sweden 345 335 355 340 360 0.5%

Switzerland 280 265 270 255 260 0.4%—

Turkey 500 575 555 610 615 0.9%

England 1780 1795 1785 1750 1790 2.5%—

Etc 250 275 265 285 285 0.4%—

Europe 15005 15000 15015 15300 15580 22.3%

Source : 4%$!!5! 1997 (171EW%=3J)

f : underO.05 * : over 100years

164

1993E! unit(1OOOWD)

Ranking Contries Consumption Ratio (%)

1 U.S.A 16,470 25.1

2 C.1.s 5,470 8.3-1

3 Japan 5,455 8.3

4 China 2,915 4.4

5 Germany 2,905 4.4I , I

6 France 1,940 3.0

7 Italy 1,910 2,9

8 England 1,790 2.7

9 Canada 1,680 2.6

10 Korea 1,675 2.6

11 Mexico 1,555 2.4z

12 Brazil 1,355 2.1

Etc 20,520 31.3

Word Total 65,640 100.0

Source : 4%9!9 1997 (i31Z~4%F213!l)

165

1994E! unti(1OOOWD)

Ranking Contries Consumption Ratio(%)

1 U.S,A 16,950 25,3

2 Japan 5,765 8.6

3 C.1.s 4,670 7.0

4 China 3,145 4.7

5 Germany 2,880 4.3

6 Italy 1,915 2.9

7 France 1,880 2.8

8 Korea 1,840 2,7

9 England 1,785 2.7

10 Canada 1,720 2.6

11 Mexico 1,680 2.5

12 Brazil 1,420 2.1

Etc 21,355 31.9

WordTotal 67,005 100.0

1995E! unit (1COWO)


1 U.S.A 17,400 24.9

2 Japan 5,830 8,5

3 C.1.s 3,935 6.3

4 China 3,615 4.9

5 Germany 2,920 4.2

6 Korea 2,145 3.0

7 Italy 1,955 2.9

8 France 1,930 2.8

9 England 1,790 2.6

10 Canada 1,735 2.6

11 Mexico 1,605 2.3

12 Brazil 1,600 2.2

Etc 23,085 32.8


unit(lOWB/D)


1 U.S,A 17,400 25.0

2 Japan 5,830 8.4

3 C.1.s 3,935 5.7

4 China 3,615 5.2

5 Germany 2,920 4.2

6 Korea 2,145 3.1

7 Italy 1,955 2.8

8 France 1,930 2.8

9 England 1,790 2.6

10 Canada 1,735 2.5

11 Mexico 1,605 2.3

12 f3razil 1,600 2.3

Etc 23,085 33.2


Unt (1OOOWD

Import 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio(’96)

US,A 7888 8620 8929 8831 9400 24.7%

West Europe 10139 10399 9840 9567 9539 25.1%

Japan 5.36 5307 5612 5581 5685 15.0%

Etc 9473 10255 11146 12261 13362 35.2%

Total 32986 34581 35527 36240 37986 100.0%

unit(1OOOWD

Export 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio(’96)

U.S.A , 918 959 943 949 978 2<6%

Canada 1101 1215 1323 1402 1484 3.9%

Mexico 1469 1434 1421 1422 1656 4.4%

Central & South

America2374 2391 2695 2797 3011 7.9%

East Europe 1887 2072 2136 2312 2699 7.1%

Middle East 15453 ‘ 16456 16513 16651 17170 46.0%

North africa 2849 2685 2652 2696 2756 7.3%

West africa 2679 2676 2675 2723 2916 7.7%

Asia & Oceanian 2414 2420 2517 2576 2790 7.3%

Etc 1842 2273 2652 2712 2526 6.6%

Total 32986 34581 35527 36240 37986 100.0%

169

2-2 7} A

World Total

Country Trillion @ Ratio RIP

OECD 13.86 9.8% 13.6

UE 3.33 2.4% 15.0

WorldTotal 141.43 100.0% 62.2

C.I.S.Country Trillion N Ratio R/P

Azerbaijan 0.85 0.6 *

Kazakhstan 1.84 1.3 *

Russia 48.63 4.4 82.1

Turkmenistan 2.89 2.0 83.3

Ukraine 1.14 0.8 62.7

Uzbekistan 1.89 1.3 39.2

Etc. 0.04 T 93.3

Total 57.28 0.5% 81.1

Source : 4%E?Q 1997 (Ui15tq%?#l!4)

f : under 0.05 * : over 100 years

North kerica

Country Trillion m Ratio RIP

U.S.A 4.68 3.3% 8.7

Canada 1.93 1.4% 12.6

Mexico 1.92 1.4% 61.4

NorthAmerica 8.53 6.1% 11.8

Source : q%f?!g 199? (Ui Flq%?3311)

170

Asia & Oceania

Country Trillion M’ Ratio R/P

Australia 0.55 0.4% 18.5

Bangladesh 0.29 0.2% 38.2

Brunei 0.40 0.3% 34.5

China 1.17 0.8% 58.8

India 0.69 0.5% 33.5

Indonesia 2.05 1.5% 30.8

Malaysia 2.27 1.6% 64.2

Pakistan 0.62 0.4% 41.0

Papua New Guinea 0.04 * *

Thailand 0.20 0.1% 18.0

Vietnam 0.14 0.1% *

etc 0.69 0.5% 73.5

Asia&Ocean ian 9.11 6.4% 40.1

Source : %%$?S! 1997 (Ui S}4%?J431)

t : under 0.05 * : over 100years

lkfkica

Country Trillion w Ratio R/P

Algeria 3.69 2.6% 56.0

Egypt 0.58 0.4% 50.1

Libya 1.31 0.9% *

Nigeria 2.97 2.1% *

etc 0.76 0.5% *

Africa 9.31 6.5% *

Source : +%9!52 1997 (U12}4%=EI)

7: under 0.05 * : over 100years

171

Europe

Country Trillion W Ratio RIP

Denmark 0.11 0.1% 17.0

Germany 0.33 0.2% 18.9

Hungary 0.09 0.1% 22.3

Italy 0.30 0.2% 14.7

Netherlands 1.81 1.3% 20.8

Norway 1.35 1.0% 33.0

Rumania 0.40 0,3% 23.0

England 0.70 0.5% 8.3

Etc 0.33 0.2% 24.6

Europe 5.42 3.9% 18.6

Source : 4%Q9 1997 (CH’E~4%i211tl)

Central & South America

Country Trillion W Rat io RIP

Argentina 0.62 0.4% 21.4

Bolivia 0.13 0.1% 40.1

Brazil 0.15 0.1% 28.9

Colombia 0.23 0.2% 49.7

Ecuador ‘ 0.10 0.l% *

Trinidad and tobago 0.35 0.3% 49.6

Venezuela 4.01 2.8% *

Etc. 0.30 0.2% *

Central& South America 5.89 4.2% 70.2

Some : 4%!21SI 1997 (tHE~4%F3?il)

T : underO.05 * : over 100year

172

Middle East

Country Trillion ~ Ratio R/P

Bahrain 0.15 0.1% 20.4

Iran 21.00 14.9% *

Iraq 3.34 2.4% *

Kuwait 1.50 1.1% *

Oman 0.85 0.6% *

Catarrh 7.08 5.0% *

Saudi Arabia 5.35 3.8% *

U.A.E 5.80 4.1% *

Yemen 0.48 0.3% *

Etc 0.24 0.2% *

Midd Ie East 45.79 2.5% *

Source : q%$?= 1997 (CIIZ}4%=3J)

T : under 0.05 * : over 100years

173

Word Totalunit( milliin TOE )

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( !)6)

OECD 795.6 820.2 856.8 869.0 917.9 45.7%

OPEC 148.8 159.2 161.7 168.1 189.7 9.4%

Non OPEC 352.6 374.2 395.5 427.7 464.5 23.1 %

WordTotal 1830.7 1860.8 1881.3 1915.3 2008.7 100.0%

Source : A%E?Q 1997 (llZ}4%PJ~)

C,,I.S.unit ( millbn TOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (’96)

Azerbaijan 6.6 5.7 5.4 5.5 5.3 0.3%

Kazakhstan 6.8 5.6 3.8 5.0 5.4 0.3%

Russia 537.6 518.8 509.8 499.9 505.0 25.1 %

Turkmenistan 50.5 54.8 29.9 27.1 29.6 1.5%

Ukraine 17.6 16.1 15.3 15.3 15.4 0.8%

Uzbekistan 35.9 37.8 39.6 40.8 41.1 2.0%

Etc. 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 *

C.1.s 655.5 639.2 604.1 593.9 602.1 30.0%

North Americaunit ( million TOE)

—

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (96)

U.S.A 463.1 468.3 487.6 481.4 492.2 24.5 %

Canada 104.5 112.9 122.3 133.4 137.7 6.9%—

Mexico 25.0 25.0 25.8 25.3 28.1 1.4%

~NorthAmerica 592.6 606.2 635.7 640.1 658.0 3.6%

Source : ~%E5Q 1997 (41?J+%E33!I)

174

Asia & Oceaniaunit(milliinTOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (’96)

Australia 21.1 22.0 25.3 26.8 26.8 1.3%

Bangladesh 5.1 5.5 6.0 6.7 6.8 0.3%

Brunei 8.8 9.3 9.4 10.4 10.4 0.5%

China 13.6 14.6 14.9 15.8 17.9 O.gyo

India 14.3 14.5 15.6 16.9 18.4 0.9%

Indonesia 48.9 50.6 56.6 57.7 59.9 3.0%

Malaysia 20.5 22.4 23.5 26.0 31.8 1.6%

Pakistan 10.9 11.6 12.3 12.6 13.7 0.7%

Thailand 6.8 7.6 8.6 9.0 10.1 0.5%

etc 8.2 8.5 8.5 8.2 8.9 0.5%

Asia& Oceanian 158.2 166.6 180.7 190.1 204.7 10 .2%

Source : 4%P!R 1997 (UiZ~4%~El)

Africaunit( milliin TOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio (’96)

Algeria 49,5 50.5 46.5 54.7 59.3 3.0%

Egypt 7.6 \ 9.0 9.5 9.9 10.4 0.5%

Libya 5.9 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 0.3%

Nigeria 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.1 4.2 0.2%

etc 0.6 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.7 0.1%

Africa 67.4 71.1 67.9 76.7 82.2 4.1%

Source : 4%$!!Y 1997 (CH~t4%=El)

Europeunt ( milh TOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( 96)

Denmark 3.7 4.1 4.4 4.8 5.8 0.3%

Germany 13.4 13.4 14.0 14.5 15.7 0.8%

Hungary 3.6 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.6 0.2%

Italy 16.3 17.5 18.6 18.3 18.12 0.9%

Netherlands 62.2 63.0 59.7 60.3 68.2 3.4%

Norway 26.5 26.0 27.7 28.0 36.8 1.8%

Rumania 18.3 17.3 15.7 15.1 14.7 0.7%

England 46.4 54.8 58.5 64.0 76.1 3.8%

Etc 12.1 12.8 12.3 12.3 11.7 0.6%

Europe 202.5 212.8 214.6 221.0 250.8 12.5%

Souroe : 4%9k2 1997 (UlZ~4%1331)

Central & South Americaunit(minim TOE )

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( ’96)

Argentina 18.1 19.5 20.0 22.6 26.1 1.3%

Bolivia 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.8 2.9 0.1%

Brazil 3.6 4.0 4.1 4.5 4.8 0.2%

Colombia 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.2 0.2%

Trinidad and tobago 5.4 5.3 5.6 5.5 6.4 0.3%

Venezuela 19.5 21.0 22.2 26.8 28.8 1.4%

Etc. 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.1%

Central& South America 55.6 58.g 61.5 68.7 75.7 3.6%

Source : q%f?!k! 1997 (Uli2}4%~34)

176

Middle Eastunit( miliiin TOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio ( Q6)

Bahrain 5.8 6.2 6.4 6.5 6.5 0.3%

Iran 22.5 24.4 28.6 31.6 34.3 1.7%

Kuwait 2.4 4.0 5.4 5.4 5.4 0.3%

Oman 2.6 2.5 2.7 3.4 3.6 0.2%

Catarrh 11.4 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 0.6%

Saudi Arabia 30.6 32.3 33.9 34.4 37.2 1.9%

U.A. E 20.0 20.6 23.2 26.9 31.5 1.6%

Etc 3.6 3.8 4.4 4.4 4.5 0.2%

Middle East 98.9 106.0 116.8 124.8 135.2 6.8%

177

Word Total

unit( millionTOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( 96)

OECD 911.8 947.0 969.6 1013.6 1063.6 53.8%

EU 238.1 252.5 253.7 273.9 301.8 14.4%

Developing Country 275.6 295.8 321.3 348.0 377.0 19.1%

WordTotal 1803.6 1828.0 1834.9 1883.8 1971.6 100.0%

Souroe : 4%9!5! 1997 (13i~~4%E9g)

C.I.S.

unit( mkn TOE)

E Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( 96)

Azerbaijan 10.6 7.8 7.3 7.2 7.2 0.4%

I Belarus I 15.1 I 14.0 I 12.3 I 11.1 I 11.6 I 0.6% II I I I I

I Kazakhstan \ 12.2 I 11.7 I 9.2 I 9.7 I 9.5 I 0.5% I

I Russia I 375.5 I 360.7 I 335 I 317.9 I 317.0 I 16.1% I

t

Turkmenistan 8.4 8.4 9.2 7.2 7.6 0.4%

Ukraine 93.2 83.6 73.2 68.6 70.4 3.6%

I Uzbekistan I 33.6 I 36.6 I 37.2 I 38.1 I 40.0 I 2.0% I

I Etc. I 16.8 / 11.5 I 10.2 I 10.3 I 10.3 I 0.5% I

I c. 1.s I 565.4 I 534.3 I 493.6 I 470.1 I 473.6 I 24.0% I

North America

unit( millionTOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( 96)

U.S.A 507.3 524,9 536.5 558.5 569.2 28.9%

Canada 60.2 61.6 63.8 63.8 66.4 3.4%

Mexico 24.9 25.4 26.5 26.7 28.1 1.4%

NorthAmerica 592,4 611.9 626.8 649.0 663,7 33.7%

Source : q%~= 1997 (QiE}%%~EJ)

178

Asia & Oceania

unit( milliin TOE)I

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio(’96)

Australia 15.2 15.7 17.5 17.6 17.2 0.9%

Bangladesh 5.1 5.5 6.0 6.6 6.8 0.3%

China 13.6 14.6 14.9 15.9 15.9 0.8%

India 14.3 14.7 15.7 17.7 19.5 1.0%

Indonesia 20.3 21.5 24.6 27.5 27.1 1.4%

Japan 50.4 50.7 54.3 55.0 59,5 3.0%

Malaysia 9.5 11.7 12.3 13.0 14.5 0.7%

New Zealand 4.4 4.3 4.0 3.8 4.2 0.2%

Pakistan 10.9 11.6 12.3 12.6 13.7 0.7%

Philippines * $ * *

Singapore 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.1%

Korea 4.6 5.7 7.6 9.2 12.2 0.6%

Taiwan 2.8 2.7 3.6 3.9 4.0 0.2%

Chinese Taipei 6.8 7.6 8.6 9.0 10.1 0.5%

etc 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.1 4.9 0.2%

Asia&Ocean ian 161.3 170.5 185.7 196.3 211.0 10.7%

Source : q%S!Y 1997 (CtlPJ&%~El)

f : under 0.05 * : over 100years

Africaunit( milkm TOE )

1 , , I

I Country I 1992 I 1993 \ 1994 \ 1995 I 1996 \ Ratio(96) \

Algeria 16.0 16.7 17.6 20.6 22.1 1.1%

Egypt 7.5 8.7 9.4 9.9 10.3 0.5%

South Africa - - - - –

etc 9.5 9.5 10.2 10.2 10.7 0.5%

Africa 33.0 34.9 37.2 40.7 43.1 2.2%

Source : q%S!Y 1997 (Ui3_t4%~3!l)

179

Europeunit( milliin TOE)

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( ’96)

Austria 5.4 5.7 5.8 6.1 6.6 0.3%

Belgium/Luxembourg 9.0 9.9 9.7 10.6 11.6 0.6%

Bulgaria 3.5 3.3 3.3 4.0 4.2 0.2%

Czecho 5.2 5.3 5,4 5.9 6.9 0.3%

Denmark 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.9 3.4 0.2%

Finland 2.5 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.0 0.2%

France 28.3 29.0 27.8 29.6 29.0 1.5%

Germany 56.7 59.8 61.1 67.0 75.2 3.8%

Greece 0.1 0.1 * * $ *

Hungary 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.9 9.9 0.5%

Iceland

Ireland 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.7 0.1%

Italy 41.2 42.3 40.8 44.9 46.9 2.4%

Holland 33.0 34.1 33.2 34.0 37.5 1.9%

Norway * * * *

Poland 7.8 8.1 8.2 8.9 9.5 0.5%

Portuggal

Rumania 22.8 22.7 21.8 21.6 22.3 1.1%

Slovakia 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.6 0.2%

Spain 5.9 5.8 6.5 7.5 8.4 0.4%

Sweden 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 *

Switzerland 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 0.1%

Turkey 4.1 4.5 5.9 6.2 8.1 0.4%

England 51.4 58.1 60.6 65.4 76.7 3.9%

Etc 5.2 4.7 4.7 4.4 6.9 0.3%

Europe 300.2 315.3 317.4 340.3 376.4 18.0%

Source : 4$?Q!Y 1997 (Ui Z4$?E2131)

T : under 0.05 * : over 100years

180

Central & South Americaunit( millionTOE)

1Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( ’96)

Argentina 20.1 21.2 21.9 24.4 27.9 1.4%

Brazil 3.6 4.0 4.1 4.5 4.7 0.2%

Chile 1.5 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.1%

Colombia 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.0 4.2 0.2%

Venezuela 19.5 21.0 22.2 27.0 28.8 1.5%

Etc. 6.9 6,8 7.5 7.5 8.4 0.4%

Central&SouthAmerica

55.6 58.6 61.3 68.9 75.5 3.6%

Source : 4%$!!Y 1997 (CJi~~4%~31)

Middle Eastunit( millkmTOE )

Country 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Ratio( 96)

lran 22.5 239 28.6 31.5 34.3 1.7%

Saudi Arabia 30.6 32.3 33.9 34.4 37.2 1.9%

U.A.E 16.9 17.6 19.5 21.0 25.0 1.3%

Etc 25.7 28.7 30.9 31.6 31.8 1.6%

Middle East 95.7 102.5 112.9 118.5 128.3 6.5%

Source : q%9!Y 1997 (lllFJ4f%~31)

181

~~+1% -%-?3+ q%%’ +++ xq~q ++~+=q%q- -lW+=Hong Kong, Chinese

Australia 115 . Mexico 106 5Chiua Taipei“Brunei

7 Indonesia 195Darussalem

New Zealand 6 Thailand 5

Papua New 46,607Canada 55 Japan 14 USAGuinea - DOE @f

Chile 21 Korea 8 Philippines 4

Totalchina 23 Malaysia 30 SingapoR -

47,201

182

1.

2.

3.

4,

5.

6.

7.

8,

9,

100

11.

12,

13.

APEC-GEMEED X11%},X12X},413x} q Q1 Proceeding.

APEC-GEMEED DB q ~% q =+$’ Proceeding.

ol~~, 1996.9, t+A]d} ~~o~ ~~1 ~+~, ~~A}

~~~~~, +x1+x] ~~ 1998

W?%%%lq, JFQl%xlw. 1997

q~~.++qjq, ++qy 1997

m%s~~ [=%QA%I 1997

INIP, International Financial Statistics 1998.9

The Central Bank of China, Financial Statistics 1998.7

International PetroIeum Encyclopedia 1997, PennWell publishing Co.

The Central Bank of China, Financial Statistics 1998,7

The World Bank, World Development Indicators 1998

Survey of Energy Resources 199$, WEC(WorId Energy CounciI)

184

3rd Meeting APEC-GEMEED

(May 8-12, 1998, Ottawa, Canada)

The Maintenance and Update of GEMEED’s

VVWW Database in Korea

KOREA

1. Introduction

We have accomplished a part of GEMEED DB goals by Korean

government funds in 1997 including GEMEED growth with the cooperation

of Colleagues and Experts, The APEC-GEMEED DB project for 1999 is

maintaining and updating the ready-made DB in 1997 and 1998. Korean DB

projects history by year is as follows:

- Project in 1997:

The minerals and energy resources related experts and dwectories in

the APEC region.

- Project in 1998:

The Construction of Database on the Oil and Gas Fields in the APEC

Region.

- Project for 1999:

APEC-GEMEED Directories and 011 and Gas Fields Database

Maintenance and Update

As a database project in 1997 “ The minerals and energy resources

related experts and directories in the APEC region” have been compIeted.

There are many who access this site, So we need to update this database,

This year’s project “The Construction of Database on the Oil and Gas

185

Fields in the APEC Region” is now under way. Next

“Maintenance and Update of APEC-GEMEED Directories

Fields Database”

2. Project Purpose

A Group of Experts on Minerals and Energy

year’s project is

and Oil and Gas

Exploration and

Development (GEMEED) is conducting the project on “APEC Network of

Minerals and Energy Database(ANMED)”. But the scope of ANMED is vast

for constructing a database for specific WWW homepages.

ANMED will be a source of general information for the time being. For

this reason, we think there are some problems in providing detailed data to

member economies for the investment promotion of minerals and energy

resources. We think that a specific and useful database should be

constructed as a part of ANMED.

The objective of this DB project is to provide more detailed information

and continuous access to an up-to–date assessment of the directmies and oil

and gas fields in member economies to facilitate strategic phming, definition

of new trends, and investment for minerals and energy exploration and

development within and between member economies,

3. Linkage

We have completed a homepage

minerals and energy resources, related

containing 265 pages which links

experts, and d~ectories in the APEC

fegion. We need member economies’ comments and review and will fiIl up

new additional organizations’ URL.

We already reviewed WWW Energy LLnks as well as publications about

oil and gas from DOE, WEC etc. to construct Oil and Gas fields DB. We

are constructing a unique and creative database without duplication with

other WWW databases.

4. Methodology

186

In gathering data, there are many sources as follows :

*

*

*

*

*

APEC - GEMEED Colleagues and Experts

Internet(http, gopher, ftp)

Publications

Meetings, Workshops

On-site visits and so on

The scope of this database project is limited to the directories and oil &

gas fields of the member economies, There are detailed methods in the

attached original proposals.

5. Budget

The estimated budget for this proposal is US$ 20,000 which will be used

for data search and input labor cost, maintenance cost. and publication cost.

We wilI consider buying another SOHO size PC server.

GEMEED colleagues or experts will be consulted for advice and

supplementation of data within the limit of this project budgetary

appropriation.

6. Others

We would appreciate it very much if GEMEED colleagues provide the

data for update on directories and the oil and gas fields in the APEC region

to Korea. There are many people who access this site. So, we published a

Korean version of GEMEED Directories for Korean companies. For member

economies, we think an English version of GEMEED Directories should be

pubfished after deliberating on this matter with GEMEED secretariat.

187

APEC FACE SHEET

Project No.Date receivedby Secretariat

kN.arne of Cornmitt.efiorking Group :

GEMEED DB Committee/Energy Working GroupTitle of Project : The Maintenance and Update of GEMEED’s

WWW Database in Korea

Proposing APEC Member : KOREA

[

Project Overseer :Name - Young-In KimTitle – Senior ResearcherOrganization - Korea Institute of Geology, Mining and

Materials(KIGAM)Postal Address : I Tel No : 82-42-868-329230, Kajung Dong, Yusungku, Fax No : 82-42–861-9720Taejon, Korea e-mail : [email protected]

Financial Total Cost ofAmount begin

Information Proposal(US$20,000) sought from APECCentral Fund($US-)I

] Project Start Date :1 Jan 1999 \ Project End Date :31 Dec 1999 I

Project Purpose :

A Group of Experts on Minerals and Energy Exploration andDevelopment(GEMEED) is conducting the project on “APEC Network ofMinerals and Energy Database(ANMED)”. But the scope of ANMED isvast for constructing a database for specific WWW homepages.

ANMED will be a source of general information for the time being. Forthis reason, we think there are some problems in providing detailed datato member economies for the investment promotion of minerals andenergy resources. We think that a specific and useful database should beconstructed as a part of ANMED.“ The objective of this DB project is to provide more detailed informationandl continuous access to an up-to-date assessment of the directories andoil and gas fields in member economies to facilitate strategic planning,definition of new trends, and investment for minerals and energyexploration and development within and between member economies,

I Signature of project Overseer I Data ISignature of Committee DataC1mir/WG Lead Shepherd

188

APEC-GEMEED, SECOND MEETING

Seoul, Korea, March 24-26, 1997

The Construction of Database on the Oil and Gas

Fields in the APEC region

KOREA

Introduction :

The first Workshop on GEMEED Database was held in Cannbera,

Australia in September 1996. At that time, Korea presented the database

proposal on “the mining related experts and organizations in the APEC

region”.

At present, we are planning the database on this project with our own

funds. The project result will be shown through the intemet, world wide

web, at the end of this year. Next year, consequently, we will maintain the

ready–made data which was constructed in 1996.

Along with this database, we have another plan to construct database on

the Oil and Gas Fields in the APEC region like the attached proposal in

1998, so we would like to contribute to GEMEED as to conducting this

project again.

Project Purpose :

A group of Experts on Minerals and Energy Exploration and

Development (GEMEED) is conducting the project on “comprehensive

database on mining and energy resource related opportunities and other

related data”. But the scope of GEMEED DB is vast for constructing a

database for specific intemet homepages (world wide web).

GEMEED DB will be a source of general information for the time beiig,

For this reason, we think there are some probIems in providing detaied data

189

to member economies for the investment promotion of oil and gas fields. We

think that a speciilc and usefuI database should be constructed as a part of

GEMEED DB.

The objective of this DB project is to provide more detailed information

and continuous access to an up–to-date assessment of the oil and gas fields

in member

trends, and

development

Linkage :

economies to facilitate strategic planning, definition of new

investment in the oil and gas fields for exploration and

within and between member economies,

At first, we will link all homepages within APEC energy working groups

as well as all the world like attached Energy Links and also review

W’blications about oiI and gas from DOE, WEC ect., and then we will

construct a unique and creative ckdtabase without duplication with other

expert groups database.

Our DB project will overlap a little bit with the energy database expert

group’s data in statistics like Table 1 but we will emphasize geoscience

based database, such as geIogical maps, drilling data and so on.

Methodology :

The our DB project for 1998 will be a part of GEMEED DB, In

gathering data, the member’s colleagues, inteme~ publications, meetings,

workshops, and site visits will be used. The detailed items of Oil and Gas

Fields are as follows :

APEC - GEMEED Colleagues and Experts :

Internet(http, gopher, ftp) : EIA - htt@//www.eia.doe.gov

Energy Information Links on the WWW - http://www.eia.doe. gov/

links.html(Attachment : 1)

Publications :

AAPG, Oil and Gas JournaI, Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,

190

Petromin, World Oil, International Petroleum Encyclopedia and so on,

. Meetings, Workshops

● on–site visits and so on

The scope of this database project is limited to the oil and gas fields of

the member economies. The main items are as follows:

. Name, size, date of discovery, and ownership of the oil and gas field.

. Location (offshore, onshore) and Infrastructure.

. Reserves and API gravity

. Depth, Production(B/d) and Cum. production(Bbl) or production

. Geoscience and survey data(map, drilling etc.)

● Metadata and other pertinent data,

We wiIl the construct database through such processes as data

analyzing, planning, design, and assessment for internet homepage.

planning.

gathering,

Budget :

The estimated

for data search

budget for this proposal is US$ 30,000 which will be used

and input labor cost, and maintenance cost, GEMEED

colleagues or experts will be consulted for advice and supplement of data

within the limit of this proje@ budgetary appropriation.

Others :

To facilitate the exploration and development of the oil and gas in the

APEC region, first of all, we need information about reserves, infrastructure,

related reports on mining rights and so on. There are many difficultities in

gathering these data, so it is necessary for the member economies cooperate.

We would appreciate it very much if GEMEED colleagues provide the

data on experts and organizations and the oil and gas fields in the APEC

region to Korea.

191

Oil

Table 1. International Oil and Natural Gas

Reserves as of December 31, 1995

(Million Barrels)

Rank a CountryOil & Gas

JournalWorld Oil

1 Saudi Arabls c d261,203 cE’61,2742 Former U.S.S.R. 57,000 189,681

3 Iraq c 100,OOO 99,1724 Kuwait c cN6,500 d94,9955 United Arab Emirates c 98,100 63,4846 Iranc 88,200 57,7007 Venezuela c 64,477 65,5658 Mexico 49,775 48,796

9 Libya c 29,500 34,74210 China 24,000 30,959

Top 10 Totzd 868,755 946,36611 United States e22,457 22,160

12 Nigeria c 20,828 21,26913 Norway 8,422 24,175

14 Algeria c 9,200 9,97915 Indonesia c 5,167 5,94516 India 5,814 5,28517 Canada 4)898 5,55018 Brazil 4,200 6,22319 Malaysia 4,300 5,2(N20 Colombia 3,500 5,50021 United Kingdom 4,293 4,538

22 Angola 5,412 3,12523 Oman 5,138 3,29824 Egypt 3,879 3,80425 Qatar c 3,700 3,922

Top 25 Total 979,964 1,076,339APEC Total 105,699 113,060OPEC Total 778,215 719,516World Total 1,007,475 1,107,111

Natural Gas (Billion Cubic Feet)

Rank b Country Oil & Gas.TOurnal

World Od

1 Former U.S.S.R, 1,977,000 1,936,586

2 Iran c 741,609 634,820

3 Qatar c 250,000 244,800

4 United Arab Emirates c 204,600 201,084

5 Saudi Arabia c d185,900 d194,100

6 United States e163,837 162,400! I

7 I Venezuela c 139,900 I 142,802

8 Algeria c 128,000 131,316

9 Nigeria c 109,710 124,423

10 Lraq c 109,500 108,000

Top 10 TotaI 4,010,056 3,880,330

11 Norway 47,498 121,925

12 Malaysia 68,000 80,200

13 Indonesia c 68,916 72,266

14 Mexico 68,413 67,668

15 Canada 67,027 65,750

16 Netherlands 65,156 64,096

1’7 I Australia I 20,082 I 94,7501

I 18 I Kuwait d56,725 1

19 China 59,000 46,300

20 Libya c 45,800 46,243

21 India 24,967 25,500

22 United Kingdom 23,308 24,710

23 Oman 25,200 20,057

24 Pakistan 27,000 17,461

25 Egypt 22,100 19,054

Top 25 Total 4,695,423 4,703,036

APEC Total 515,275 589,334

OPEC Total 2,037,335 1,957,004

World Total 4,933,572 4,951,888

193

a: Rank is based on an average of oiI reserves reported by Oil &Gas Journal and World Oil.

b: Rank is based on an average of natural gas reserves reportedby Oil & Gas Journal and World Oil,

c: Member of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries(OPEC).

cl Includes one-half of the reserves in the Neutral Zone.e: Energy Information Administration proved reserves as of

December 31, 1994 were published by the Oil & Gas Journal asits estimates as of December 31, 1995.

Note: The Energy Information Administration does not certify theseinternational reserves data, but reproduces the information as amatter of convenience for the reader.

Sources: PennWell Publishing Company, Oil and Gas Journal, December25, 1995, pp. 44-45. Gulf Publishing Company, World Oil,August, 1996, p. 34.

194

APEC FACESHEET

Date receivedProject No.

by SecretariatName of Cornmitte~orking Group :

GEMEED DB Committe/Energy Working GroupTitle of Project : The Construction of Database on the Oil and Gas

Fields in the APEC Region

Proposing APEC Member : KOREA

Project Overseer :Name – Young-in KIMTitle — Senior ResearcherOrganization – Korea Institute of Geology, Mining and

Materials (KIGAM)Postal Address : Tel No : 82-42-868-329230, Kajung Dong, Yusungku, Fax No :82-42-861-9720Taejon, Korea e–mail : [email protected]

Financial Total Cost ofAmount begin

Informationsought from APEC

PropOsaI (US$ 30,000) Cential Fund($Us_)I

I Project Start Date : 1 Jan 1998 / Project End Date :31 Dec 1998 I

Project Purpose :

A group of Experts on Minerals and Energy Exploration andDevelopment (GEMEED) is conducting the project on “comprehensivedatabase on mining and energy resource related opportunities and other

related data”. But the scope of GEMEED DB is vast for constructing a

database for specific intemet homepages (world wide web).

GEMEED DB will be a source of general information for the time being.\For this reason, we think there are some problems in providing detaiedldata to member economies for the investment promotion of oil and gasfields, We think that a spectilc and useful database shouId be constructed

as a part of GEMEED DB.

The objective of this DB project is to provide more detailed informationand continuous access to an up–to-date assessment of the oil and gas

]fieIds in member economies to facilitate strategic planning, definition oflnew trends, and investment in the oil and gas fields for exploration and

development within and between member economies.Signature of Project Overseer DataSignature of CommitteeChair/WG Lead Shepherd

Data

195

PROJECT TITLE

“The Construction of Database on the Oil and

Gas Fields in the APEC region”

1. Project Purpose :

A group of Experts on Minerals and Energy Exploration and

Development (GEMEED) is conducting the project on “comprehensive

data”base on mining and energy resource related opportunities and otherrelated data”. But the scope of GEMEED DB is vast for constructing a

database for specific intemet homepages (world wide web).GEMEED DB will be a source of general information for the time being.

For this reason, we think there are some problems in providing detaied data

to member economies for the investment promotion of oil and gas fieIds, Wethink that a specific and useful database should be constructed as a part of

GENJJ3ED DB.The objective of this DB project is to provide more detaikd information

and continuous access to an up–to-date assessment of the oil and gas fieldsin member economies to facilitate strategic plaming, definition of new

trends, and investment in the oil and gas fields for exploration and

development within and between member economies.The objective of this DB project is tn provide continuous access to an up

to date assessment of the oil and gas fields in member economies tofacilitate strategic planning, definition of new trends, and investment in the

oil and gas fields for the exact exploration and development within and

between member economies.

2. Linkage :

At first, we will link aIl homepages within APEC energy working groups

as well as all the world Iike attached Energy Links and also review

publications about oil and gas from DOE, WEC ect., and then we willconstruct a unique and creative database without duplication with other

expert groups database.Our DB project will overlap a little bit with the energy database expert

group’s data in statistics like Table 1 but we will emphasize geoscience

196

based database, such as gelogical maps, drilling data and so on.

3. Methodology :

The our DB project for 1998 will be a part of GEMEED DB. In

gathering data, the member’s colleagues, intemet, publications, meetings,workshops, and site visits wiIl be used. The detailed items of Oil and GasFields are as follows :

APEC - GEMEED Colleagues and Experts :Internet(http, gopher, ftp) :EIA - http://www.eia.doe.gov

Energy Information Links on the WWW - http://www,eia.doe.gov/links,htrnl(Attachment : 1)

Publications :

AAPG, Oil and Gas Journal, Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology,Petromin, World Oil, International Petroleum Encyclopedia and so on.

Meetings, WorkshopsOn-site visits and so on

The scope of this database project is limited to the oil and gas fields of

the member economies. The main items are as follows:● Name, size, date of discovery, and ownership of the oil and gas field.● Lacation(offshore, onshore) and Infrastructure.

. Reserves and API gravity● Depth, Production(B/d) and Cum.production( Bbl) or productionplanning.

. Geoscience and survey data(map, driIling etc.)

. Metadata and other pertinent data.

We will the construct database through such processes as data gathering,analyzing, planning, design, and assessment for internet homepage.

4. Budget :

The estimated budget for this proposal is US$ 30,000 which will be used

for data search and input labor cost, and maintenance cost. GEMEEDcolleagues or experts will be consulted for advice and supplement of datawithin the limit of this project budgetary appropriation.

197

Attachment : 1

Energy and Statistical Information on the Web

Energy Links

These links are provided solely as a service to our customers, and therefore

should not be construed as advocating or reflecting any position of the

Energy Information Administration (EIA), In addition, EIA does not

guarantee the content or accuracy of any information presented in linked

sites.

Department of Energy Resources Board

The Department of Energy has Member ofilces: Energy Efilciency and

created a home page for its Renewable Energy, Energy Information

energy missions: AdministratioIAEnergy Resesrc~ FossilEnergy, Nuclear Energy, and Policy.

@Energy Information, Products,and Programs

Contents: energy data and analysis,energytechnology,energyefficiency,outreachprograms,andenergylinks.

Other U.S. Department of Energy Sites

● Department of Energy “ Gore-Chemomyrdin C2xnmission

“ DOE - Energy Efficiency and c South Africa - U.S. DataRenewable Energy Exchange Page

“ DOE - Office of Fossil Energy c Summit of Americas Page

L● DOE- Office of Policy

U.S. Department of Energy - National Laboratories

● Argonne NationaI Laboratcq ● National Renewable Energy

● Brookhaven National Laboratory Laboratory

“ Lawrence Berkely National ● Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Laboratory c Pacific Northwest National

“ Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Laboratory ● Sandia National Laboratory

● Los Alamos National Laboratory—

Federal Government

● Central Intelligence AgencyWorld Fact Book

s Business Information Service forthe NewIy Independent States

c Central and Eastern EuropeBusiness Information Center

c International TradeAdmirktration -Energy Division

● Minerals Management Service‘ National Science Foundation● U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)● USGS Minerals Page● U.S. Library of Congress -

Country Studiesc U.S. Dept. of State – Chile Visit

Local, State Governments, UniversitiesAcademic

9California Energy Commission“Colorado School of Mines - World

Energy“ Hawaii State Energy Office“ Idtio Dept. of Water Resources

Energy Div.“Michigan Energy Appraisal“Mmesota Dept. of Public Service● National Academy of Sciences● Nat. Assoc. of Regulatory Utiiity

Commissioners

International Energy Statistics

● New Mexico’s Go-Tech● PetroleumTech. Transfer Council● Texas Bureau of Economic

Geology=U, of Illinois Arterial Blockage in

Petroleum Pages University of Tulsa“Utah Office of Energy Services=Energy Data Page at U. of

Wisconsin

s African 0;1 Industry Statistics*APEC● Australian Department of Primary

Industries and Energy● British Petroleum Statistical Review=Canadian Energy Research Institute● Natural Resources Canada -

Energy Sectors Canadian Residential Energy Data

and =Analysis Center“East-West Center*European Energy Network● International Energy Agency

“ IEA Int. Centre for Gas TechnologyInformation

● Japm Petroleum Association of● Mexico - Energy Regulatory

CommissionQMexico - Ministry of Energy“Rand Afrikaans University, South

Africa (IES)● Swedew NUTEKj Dept. for Energy

Economic Studies“Embassy of Turkmenistan*United Nations Energy Statisticss Embassy of Saudi Arabia“World Bank

199

Energy Companies—

“ Agip Petroli ● 011Online

● Amoco Corporation ● OneOk

● tico Corpmation ● Oryx Energy

● Ashland Inc. ● Neste Petroleum AS

● Atomic Energy Corporation of South ● Norsk HydroAfrica

● Ohio Resources corporation● Bay State Gas Company “Parker Drilling● British Petroleum

● Peabody Coal. {CabotEnergy 9 PDVSA“Canadkn HYdro Developers “Petroliam Nasional B=had. (chevron Corporation (National Oil Company of Malaysia)● (CleanFuel Network

● Petrolink● Conoco *Petro Pages“CSIRO Petroleum I Phibro Inc.● Duke Power ● Schlumberger Ltd.“Eden Exploration Ltd. ● Shell Oil“Elf Exploration Inc. “Southern Oilfield Supply and“IExxon Inc. Manufactming

=Grenley & Stewart Resources, Inc. “Statoil

● I-IS Resources Inc. “Tejas Power Corporation

● Hurricane Hydrocarbons “Texaco

● Iceland Oil Ltd. ● Total

● Kuwait National Petroleum Company ● Tokyo Ek?ctric power

● Mapco ● Valvoline Company

● Maraven S,A “The Williams Companies, Inc.

=Media FX Corp. =Ultmmar- Diamond Shamrock

“Mobil Oil oUnicorn

“Oil & Gas .lournal Online

200

Trade Associations

“American Boiler ManufacturersAssociation

● kmrican Gas Association● herican Petroleum Institute● American Public Works Association*American Wind Energy Association● Biomass Energy Alliances Distribution Contractors Association● E&son Electric Institute● Electric Power Research Institute“EPRI: Industrial and Agricultural

Bus. Unit“Electric Vehicles for a Clean Future“Export Council for Energy Efficiency● Export Council for RenewableEnergy

Other Energy Links

*ARAL Energy News“American Association of Petroleum

Geologistss CMS Business Intelligence● CNN Commodities Prices“ Center for Renewable Energy and

Sustainable Technology● Common Purpose for Clean Energy● Dwights: Energy Data, Software and

Information Services“Electricity Net Online=Energy Institute of the i%neqcias=Energy Centrals Energy Modeling Forums Global Hubbert Peak at Ecosystems“John S. Herold, Inc.“ INO Global Marketss International Association for Energy

Economicsc International Energy Foundation● International Institute for Energy

Conservation

“Gas Research Institutes Independent Petroleum Association

of America“Interstate Natural Gas Association of

AmericaBMidwest Gas Association● National Association of Royalty

Owners● National Petroleum Council=National Petroleum Refiners

Association“North American Electric Reliabdity

Council10regon People’s Utility District

Association

● Instituteof Gas Technology“ InternationalBuilding Performance

SimulationAssociation

BInternationalSolar Energy Society‘ Kobe Steel, Energy & Chemical Plant

Group“LLoyd’s List● Moody’s World Energy Group

Lds● National Energy Foundation“Northeast-Midwest Institute

O&G

● Offshore 011 and Gas Technology* Oil Worldc PetroleumFinancial Network● Rocky Mountain Miieral Law

Foundation

● Rezachek’s Renewable Energy Page● Russian Financial and Other

Statistics“ Solar Energy IndustriesAssociationc SustainableMinnesota* The Utility Comection

201

Other Federal Information and Statistics Sources

“ Bureau of the Census “ EnvironmentalProtection Agency“ Bureau of Economic Analysis ● FedStat - One Stop Shopping for● Bureau of Labor Statistics Federal Statistics

● Bureau of Transportation ● Fed World

Statistics ● InternalRevenue Service

● Center for Disease Control ● InternationalTradekhninistration

● Departmentof Agriculture *NASA

=Departmentof Commerce *National Climatic Data Center

● Departmentof Defense ● National Institutesof Health

“ Departmentof Education “ National Library of Medicine

s Departmentof Health and Human =Social Security AdministrationServices “ U.S. House of Representatives

“ Departmentof Housing and Urban I U.S. Library of CongressDevelopment

● U.S. Library of Congress -“ Departmentof Interior THOMAS LegislativeInformation“ Departmentof Justice “ U.S. Senate● Departmentof Labor “ White House● Departmentof State “ White House - Economic Briefii=Departmentof the Treasury Room

wDepartmentof Tranqxxtation

● Department of Veteran’s Affairs—

File last motiled: March 17, 1997contact:MaIk [email protected]: (202) 586-1130Fax: (202) 586-9753

IjlW: http:lhvuw.eia.doe.govllinks.html

If you are having technical problems with this site, please contact the EMWebmaster at wrnaster@eia. doe.gov

202

EXPERT GROUP ON MINERALS AND ENERGYEXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT (GEMEED)

SUMMARY RECORD OF THE THIRD MEETING

8-12 May, 1998Ottawa,Canada

1. Introduction

The Third Meeting of GEMEED was held on 11-12 May 1998 at the Sheraton Hotel in0ttaw4 under the Chairmanship of Mr. Tomas Astorga, of the Ministry of Mines ofChile, and Ms. Bethany Armstrong of Natural Resources Canada. Representatives ofAustralia, Canada, Chile, Indonesia Japan, Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, ChineseTaipei, Thailand and the USA attended. Peru was present as observer.

Two meetings preceded the Annual Meeting:

““ Database Steering Committee““’ Environmental Cooperation Steering Committee (Preparatory meeting this

committee is expected to be ofilcially established at the next EWG meeting).

The following documents are annexed:

Annex 1:Annex 2:Annex 3:Annex 4:

Annex 5:Annex 6:Annex 7:Annex 8:

AgendaList of delegatesVoluntary reports by member economiesSummary record of the preparatory meeting of the proposedEnvironmental Cooperation Steering CommitteeSummary record of the Database Steering CommitteeSecretariat~ReportJapanese Project ProposalsAustralian Project Proposa{

2. Introductory Remarks:

Mr. Astorga and Ms. Armstrong, co-chairs of the meeting, welcomed the delegates. Ms.Armstrong introduced Ms. Linda J. Keen, Assistant Deputy Minister, Minerals andMetals Sector, Natural Resources Canada.

203

3. Opening address by Linda J. Keen, Assistant Deputy Minister

Ms. Keen welcomed the delegates to Ottawa, and stressed the relevance of a meeting ofthis nature, particularly as it addressed the issue of sustainable development of mineralsand metals.

4. Procedural issues

Mr. Astorga reviewed the conclusions of the forward planning meeting, which took placein Tokyo in conjunction with ECO~ 7. He explained the new directives on third tiergroups, issued by the EWG at its recent meeting in Mexico. GEMEED will proposecreating the Environmental Cooperation Steering Committee at the next EWG meeting inAugust 1998, in Cairns, Australia.

Australia asked for minor changes to the Summary Record of the Database SteeringCommittee. The Secretariat agreed to make the changes and will distribute the amendeddocument to all the member economies.

5. Voluntary reports by Economies

““ Australian presentation: Australia provided a brief description of its new resourcespolicy statement on minerals and petroleum and outlined some of the initiatives takenby the government.

““ Canadian presentation: Canada provided a brief review of its investment climate.

““ Chilean presentation: Chile gave a presentation on a general outlook of the Chileaneconomy from the minerals and metals point of view, underlying certain projectionson copper production and world-market share.

““ l[ndonesian presentation: Indonesia provided a review of mining and energydevelopment in the countiy.

““ Japanese presentation: Japan gave a summary of the current state of the Japanesemining industry, particular y on its overseas activities and the government= overseas

“ cooperation activities.

““ IKoreanpresentation: Korea provided an overview of its rehabilitation program forabandoned coal mines.

““ Thailand: Thailand gave a presentation on sustainable development of mineralresources in the economy, including its attempts to increase added value to its mineralresources and to improve its legislation and regulations.

204

““ US presentation: The US expressed its concerns about the misuse of theprecautionary principle and international regulatory initiatives such as the BaselConvention, and ‘~e bansll

6. Report by GEMEED Secretariat

The Secretariat explained its activities since the Second Meeting in Korea, and reportedthat Chile had commissioned a study on energy efficiency in mining to provide baselinedata for fiture work by GEMEED. The meeting accepted the Report by the Secretariat asan accurate summary of activities since the second meeting.

7. Programs of Cooperation

7.1. Comprehensive database

Dr. Williamsonreviewedthe statusof the databaseproject. AMSAT (the consultant)gave a presentationon implementationof the project to date and demonstratedthedatabaseon the Internet.Therewas discussionabout the cost of maintenanceof thedatabaseandoptionsfor findingthedatabase,includingadvertising.

7.2. Environmental cooperation

Mr. Kamei reviewed the conclusions of the preparatory meeting of the EnvironmentalCooperation Steering Committee on May 8ti. He recommended, and the meeting agreed,that the draft terms of reference be approved by GEMEED and ofllcially submitted to theEWG. Mr. Kamei asked all GEMEED delegates to contact their colleagues on the EWGand request support for the setting up the committee at the next EWG meeting.

Japandescribeditsthreeprojectproposals,whichwere supportedby all economies.Theprojectsare:

““ Information service center on internet for environmental issues in APECeconomies

““ Research project on the trends in international environmental law affecting themining industry

““ Research on life cycle assessment in metal mining

Japan proposed the creation of an informal group to discuss the environmental lawproject, and invited the participation of interested economies. Japan will contract anexpert on international law to give a presentation at ECOW(l S.

The Secretariat will write a position paper with Japan on procedural issues related toenvironmental law and regulations, which till be presented at ECOWU 8. The items shallbe procedural (such as legal information from the ANMED database, setting u an

Jinformal network to share information on new international regulations, Secretariat %key

205

note on environmental law from several member economies, Japanese proposal for apaper on general trends on international environmental law). This position paper will befinalized in consultation with the Environmental Cooperation Steering Committee andpresented at that committee during ECO~ 8.

Japan will distribute questionnaires to economies to elicit their views related to theresearch on life cycle assessment in metal mining. Japan expects each membereconomy% cooperation answering the questionnaire.

The Secretariat asked Mr. Campusano to provide liaison with the new EnvironmentalCooperation Steering Committee.

Australiaelaboratedon its proposalfor a projecton sustainableminingbased on bestpractices.After discussion,Mr. Astorga proposed that a small group of interestedeconomiesgatherafterthemeetingto attemptto reachconsensuson how thk shouldbestructured.Thk group met and agreed on project scope and objectives. Australiapresented a revised proposal, titled % orkshops for promotion of sustainabledevelopmentof mineralresource~ as a basisfor submissionof an applicationfor ~Ffunding.

8. Industry panel

James P. Cooney DSD: Applying the Concept

Mr Cooney spokeaboutPlacerDome%newSustainabilityPolicy. ForPlacerDome,sustainabilitymeanstheexploration,design,construction,operationandclosureof minesin a mannerthatrespectsandrespondsto thesocial,environmentalandeconomicneedsof presentgenerationsandanticipatesthoseof futuregenerationsin thecommunitiesandcountrieswhereitworks. Thisdefinitionis thefoundationfor five areasof specificobjectives:corporatecommitment;publicresponsibility;socialprogress;environmentalstewardship;and,economicbenefits.

Ian Thompson HCommunity Relations

Mr Thompson indicated that, as the indus~ has broadened its overseas activities,particularly in developing countries, community relations has become the ~ot button”issue for the mining industry in the 1990s. H[esuggested that industry must have thesupport of local communities to be successful, particularly in regard to how it managesthe exploration and development phase of mining projects. The current culture ofmineral exploration contains many sources of potential conflict with local communities<Sensitivity to the needs, aspirations, and fears of local communities, as well as bettercommunications skills, are key to ensuring that cooperation, rather than conflict,characterizes the industry-community relationship.

206

Rick Siwik n Environmental Protection: Tailings Management

Mr Siwik%presentation reviewed the historical background for tailings management inCanada. He then provided an overview of international activities and initiatives related totailings management. In this overview, he briefly mentioned the workshop of theInternational Council for Metals and the Environment in Stockholm in May 1997, andtwo UNEP-sponsored guidelines dealing with tailings management and large damconstruction. He concluded his presentation by summarizing the activities of the MiningAssociation of Canada in developing a guide to tailings management, and Norandapolicy on tailings management.

Dan Paszkowski DEnergy Efficiency Efforts in Mining

Mr Paszkowski spoke about the negotiations and outcome of the recently concludedKyoto Protocol on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. He then reviewed thecommitment made by Canada to reduce its emissions and the expected impact onCanada%!outlook for energy consumption into the 21* century.

Mr Paszkowski indicated that the metal mining industry in Canada has taken a pro-activeapproach in seeking to reduce its energy consumption, thereby reducing greenhouse gasemissions. Through a Task Force on Energy Initiatives, it is implementing a voluntarychallenge and registration program. He reported industry is already making progress inbecoming more efficient, but warned that there are a number of pitfalls that must beovercome.

In concluding, he opined that the Kyoto Protocol is only the beginning of the debate onclimate change; that the industry is demonstrating that voluntzuy approaches work, andthat increased energy efficiency is a ‘!?in-winlJ situation.

Juanita Galaz DEnvironmental Opportunities in Chile%Mining Sector

Ms Galaz provided an overview of Chile economic profile, indicating that there has beentremendous growth in foreign direct investment, particularly in mining, since 1990.Similarly, mineral production has increased significantly, with copper productiondoubling in that time span. Mining exports represent 46 percent of Chile% total exports.

As mining has grown in Chile over the last 10-15 years, so has concern overenvironmental issues. The National Commission for the Environment (CONAMA) wascreated in 1990, and in 1994, a general environmental law (Law No. 19.300) was passed.The law has three main characteristics: it adopts the polluter pays principle; it makesenvironmental impact assessment mandatory for large projects; and it establishes liabilityfor environmental damage.

207

At thestartof theafternoonsession,Mr. Gary Nash, International Council on Metalsand the Environment (ICME), outlined the membership and work program of the Counciland spoke briefly about some of the current issues related to metals and the environment.

9. Programs of cooperation: new themes and project proposals

Presentations on project proposals and project ideas by potential sponsors:

““ Safe Use of Minerals and Metals (Canada)““ Energy Efficiency (Chile)““ International Environmental Regulations (Chile)““ Maintenance and Update of GEMEED%VWW Database (Korea)““ Workshops for promotion of Sustainable Development of mineral resources

(Australia). The revised proposal was discussed and accepted by GEMEED.

The Secretariat will circulate these presentations and other information to GEMEEDdelegates.

10. Other business

At the request of the Co-chairs, the GEMEED delegates discussed the choice of acronymfor the Expert Group: either retaining ~ EM$3ED0or adopting 9 GMEEDD whichreflects the revised name of the Expert Group. The delegates unanimously expressedtheir preference to retain the acronym GEMEED.

11. Next meetings

The SecondEnvironmentalCooperationWorkshop(ECO~ 8) will be heldin Santiago,28,29 and30 of September1998.

Thailand offeredto hosttheFourthGEMEEDAnnualMeetinginPhuketin May 1999.Tks offer wasgratefidlyacceptedby GEMEED.

me lLJnitedStates will explore tie possibility OfhostingtheFifi GEMEEI)Meeting inautumn 2000.

12. Approval of summary record

The delegates approved the Summary record by unanimity.

208

13. Closing remarks

The Chairman of GEMEED expressed the appreciation of all GEMEED representativesto Natural Resources Canada for its hospitality and the excellent arrangements for themeeting. He also expressed appreciation for the assistance provided by the CanadianInternational Development Agency to support delegate participation at GEMEED 3.

He reaffkned the commitment of GEMEED members to advance the objectives ofGEMEED.

Ottawa, May 12, 1998

209

* 71

- KOREA

CHINA

HONGKONG

INDONESIA

JAPAN

MALAYSIA

PHILIPPINES

RUSSIA

SINGAPORE

TAMAN-Chim

THAILAND

VIET NAM

CANADA

MEXICO

U.S.A

CHILE

PERU

AUSTRALIA

NEWzEALAND

P.N.G

136,164 144,616

182,877 142,189

188,063 208,616

53,443 41,694

420,957 338,754

78,904 79,046

25,088 38,277

87,368 67,619

124,986 132,437

122,098 113,930

57,538 62,859

8,850 11,200

214,422 200,929

65,268 61,1602)

688,697 899,020

16,923 19,660

6,814 10,263

62,900 65,881

?

I10,090

101,600

-1003)

-11,127

17,326

1,145

14,453

1,564

-1,358

17,556

6,5312)

-197,000

-1,296

-1,739

1,807

14,071 14,519 406

2,142 1,697 1,0172)’

29,718

-4,816

94,350

-7,3623)

-4,303

3,345

14,803

7,776

-2,917

-1,635

-9,261

-1,9232)

-166,800

-4,062

-3,407

-12,928

-5,566

3132)

2) 19SW ~}s, 3) 1995 +=.

7:)s : ~~~~~ [~xl+xl ~~] 1998

a%’+%%=1 [J#@l%71@Yl 1997

IN-IF [International Financial Statistics] 1998.9

The Central Bank of China [Financial Statistics] 1998.7

210

=+ 7)

KOREA

BRUNEI

CHINA

HONG KONG

INDONESIA

JAPAN

MALAYSIA

PHILIPPINES

RUSSIA

SINGAPORE]

TAIWAN-China

THAILAND

VIET NAM

CANADA

MEXICO

U.S.A

CHILE

PERU

AUSTRALIA

NEWZEALAND

P.N.G

(@q : q~+,giq %)

=V-1*’W ~yl*4j& %xl‘%%’%19% GNP

(GDP) (GNP)(199W)

(4!3FIGDP71%)

4,426 4,374 10,543 5.5

551) 4~2) 4.61)

9,177 9,0811) 750 8.8

1,723 1,5301) 24,290 5,3

2,146 1,976 1,080 4.6

41,927 51,4921) 40,940 0.9

985 935 4,370 7.8

822 857 1,160 9.7

4,498 3,5601) 2,410 -4.23)

941 949 30,550 7.0

2,834 2,850 12,838 6.8

1,539 1,493 2,960 -0.4

257 2191) 290 8.8

6,176 5,978 19,020 3.8

4,028 3,417 3,670 7.0

80,799 80,601 28,020 3.8

771 741 4,860 7.1

652 5871) 2,420 7.2

3,947 3,824 20,090 2.9

659 606 15,720 2.9

512) 501) 1,150 13.32)

? : 1) 1996% ~}=, 2) 1993 ~}i=, 3) 1995 ~}=

X}s. : &f.&q [~g ~]~] 1997

IMF [International Financial Statistics] 1998.9

The

The

Central Bank of China [Financial

World Bank [World Development

Statistics] 1998.7

Indicators] 1998

211

4 q - APECQl H]=x1x(Comp~ative Indicators of World & APEC)

~g gs g$q “421 APECda q~l(%:

q q 1995 10,OOOM 13383 6238 46.6

0] ? 1998 loow%l 5930 2510 42.3

GDP 1996 10QIEH 28584 16648” 58.2

?QIQi 1996 lo’q%t+ 10658 4938 46.3

%?5 1996 1? 5290 2399 45.3

=Ftl 1996 1! 5368 2539 47.3

~++~~+q 1995 ~ooo~ 3065367 1 165443” 380

x}~Z}~.@~ 1996 1000Q 54657 32 971s) 60.3

37~4j&3 1996 looo~ 749977 444592 59.3 -

3~>aEq 1996 1000GT 24187 197404’ 81.6

212

&+~ APEC=#7}+q %?5 - q(Exports & Imports between Korea and APEC area)

=+3

KOREA

APEC

ASIA

BRUNEI

CHINA

HONGKONG

INDONESIA

JAPANMALAYSIA

PHILIPPINES

RUSSIA

SINGAPORETAIWAN-Chim

THAILAND

VIET NAM

JORTH-AMERICA

CANADA

MEXICO

U.S.A

;OUTH-AMERICA

CHILEPERU

OCEANIA

AUSTRALIA

NEw ZEALAND

P.N,G

+-a1993 I 1996 / 1997

82236

58379

10

5151

6431

2095

11564

1430

935

601

3109

2296

1761

728

1374

997

18138

373

58

1185

124

19

129715 136164

91392 94604

33 29

11377 13572

11131 11725

3198 3540

15767 14771

4333 4356

1906 2601

1968 1767

6439 5796

4005 4612

2664 2242

1599 1603

1203 1514

1191 1471

21670 21625

640 655

204 236

1808 2210

233 241

23 38

=-l-%=+83800 150339

59198 102679

273 475

3929 8539

935 1143

2588 4013

20016 31 4A9

1947 3007

318 581

975 1810

1540 2527

1407 2725

539 1219

91 232

1695 2724

158 408

17928 33305

53a 1103

86 181

3347 6272

571 816

317 150

144616

96498

48710117

903

4107

27907

3283

712

1535

2417

2421

1284~~

2604

344

30122

1162

104

589475C103

213

@qq-

(Foreign Trade

APEC~715+~ Y% ( 1977)

between Korea and APEC area by Rank)

>0;~ 4

Korea

.—

APEC.—

1

2

3-—

4

5.—

6

7

8——9

10

’11

’12-—

13

’14

15——16

17.—

18——

19——

20

_._.LY?144616! 100.(

96498~ 66.1

30122’: 20.[

27 907/ 19.:

: 946041 69.51

U.S.A. j 21 625! 15.9) U.S.A.

4107: 2.8

Japan \ 14 771! 10.8I Japan

China ~ 13 572; 10.0 China

Hong Kong \ 11 725; 8.6 Austrdla

Singapore ~ 5 7%; 4.2 Indonesia

Taiwan-ctin, ~ 4 612~ 3.4 Malaysia

10 l17\ 7.(

5 894! 4.1

+

=

2 421; 1,7

2 417j 1.7

1 535/ 1.1

1 w~ 0.9

1 162! 0.8

Thailand / 2 242/ 1.6 Russia

Austraha ~ 2 210; 1.6 Thailand

Russia 1 1 767~ L31 Chile

Viet Nam / 1 603\ 1.21 Hong Kong 903; 0.61

Canada \ 1514: l.l\ New zeakmd

Mexico \ 1471: 1.11 Philippines 712j 0.51

655: 0.51 Brunei

=+

344; 0,2

239; 0.2

l(xj 0.1

29j 0.01 Peru 104: 0.11.—

214

~q : lCKW ‘++

A(3 l-l =+ 7)1)

irizQlfiE

q & % 7f ~q+x]l)

(%)

Korea \ 280780 / 100.0 -8452

APEC j 191 102 ; 68.1 -1886

1 U.S.A. j 51747 j 18.4 Hong Kong ~ 10822

2 Japan ~ 42678 ; 15,2 China ~ 3456

3 China ~23689 ~ 8.4 Singapore ~ 3380

4 Hong Kong ; 12628 ~ 4.5 Taiw~-ctim \ 2191

5 Singapore ; 8213 ~ 2.9 Philippines / 1 889

6 Australia / 8104 / 2.9 Viet Nam / 1365

7 Indonesia ; 7648 ; 2.7 Mexico ~ 1 127

8 Malaysia \ 7639 ; 2.7 Malaysia ~ 1073

9 Taiwan-cfina j 7033 ~ 2,5 Thailand ; 959

10 Canada ~ 4118 ~ 1,5 Russia ~ 233

11 Thailand \ 3526 ; 1.3 Peru \ 132

12 Philippines : 3313 ~ 1.2 P.N.G ! -68

13 Russia : 3302 / 1.2 Brunei ~ -458

14 Viet Nam ;184; 0.6 New zeakmd \ -506

15 Chile ; 1817 : 0.6 Chile ~ -509

16 Mexico j 1 815 ~ 0.6 Indonesia \ -566

17 New zealand ~ 991 ; 0.4 Canada ~ -1090

18 Brunei ~ 516 j 0.2 Austxalia \ -3683

19 Peru ~ 340 ; 0.1 U.S.A. \ -8497

20 P.N.G : 144 j 0.1 Japan j -13136

215

I

[

.ag~ q+od~

q 7} ~ -~gq(1,Oooa) E!!+ (1995, % i!=w

&l~}+lg QjlKm2 (1996-2(1995,

Kmz) (1990-1 g})1990 1998

000, Al)2000

995,%)As 14

Kwea,Rep.of 99 268”! 42 869; 46 430; 472751 1.0! 454”! 73.52);

Brunei 5 765; 257; 313; 326; 2.41 49; 75.5;

China 9 596 961j 155 305~1 255 091;1 276 301! 1.1; 127~ 69.9~

HonQ Kong 1 075j 5 705~ 6298: 6 373; 1.6; 5 758~ 78.8:

Indonesia 1 904 569/ 182 812; 206 522/ 212 565~ 1 .5; 102: 65.1 ~

Japan 377801 ; 123 537; 125 920~ 126 428; 0.3; 331 j 80.0;

Wdaysia 329 758~ 17 891; 21 450! 22 299\ 2.5~ 61 ~ 72.0;

Phlli~ines 300 ooo~ 60 779; 72 164~ 75 037; 2.7~ 234; 68 .3;

Russia 17 075 400j 148 292~ 147 231! 146 196; -..~~~

64.4;

.$ingapore 6181 3 016; 3 491 i 3 587; 2.0/ 4 833; 77.3/

Taiwan-China 36 000: 20 353\ 21 804: 22 161; 0.9/ 592; 74.83’!

Thailand 513 115; 55 580i 59 612/ 60 495; 1.4~ ‘,117; 69.3;

Viet Nam 331 689: 66 689~ 77 896~ 80 549; 2.4j 225\ 664’;

NORTH AMERICA

Canada 9 970 610; 27 791 ~ 30 194! 30 679j 2.2! 3j 78.9:

Mexico 1 958 201/ ‘ 83 226: 95 831/ 98 881! 1.8; 46; 72.5;

U.S.A. 9363 520~ 254 106; 273 754; 277 625; 1.0: 76.7!,, 28; ,

SOUTH AMERICA

E

Chile 756 626! 13 099; 14 824! 15211: 1.6j 19/ 75.3

Peru 1 285 216~ 21 569~ 24 797; 25 662; 1.7; 18/ 68.3

. OCEANIA

A.@da 7 741 220: 16 888: 18 445! 18 838; 1.1! 21 78.3

New zealand 270 534/ 3 360j 3 680~ 3 760j 1.0: 13! 77.2

P.N.G 462 840; 3 839; 4 1602~ 4811j 1.9j ,~;

57.9

XIE. : s2qa [%l=F%Ea+j74Qa] n3-7,[&qa++q] 1~ [.4QE] Igw, q~+}+ [X1**X] 1~

UN hographic Yearbwkl 1997,R%rld PopulationRomectsl 1937.~ Y2[StatisticalYcartmkl 1997+ : 1)1%%7}2 ‘?34 99,313k$, 9=+35 4E8q 19%’% ~}?a. 94 99,373kd, +.!+%!s 46%

2) =MW(’%?4E)X}SL, 1995% ~}zi’a 3) 1995% +SL’?J

4) UN [Statistical Yeartwk for Mla and The Pscificl x}?%%

SOURCE : Main Statistkal Indicators in APEC - National Statistical Office Republic of KOREA

216

@B%$li&KR-98(C)-43

Oiland Gas Fields DBm

Oil and Gas Fields DB+~ - OSTI.GOV

Documents

Transcript of Oil and Gas Fields DB+~ - OSTI.GOV