Experimental implementation of acoustic impedance control by a 2D network of distributed smart cells
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
Transcript of Experimental implementation of acoustic impedance control by a 2D network of distributed smart cells
Experimental implementation of acoustic
impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells.
P. David, M. Collet, J.-M. Cote
dM
em
s2
01
0,
Be
san
çon
2dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Outline
1. Introduction
a. Structural Control : decentralized strategy
b. Structural Control : centralized strategy
c. A new approach
2. Integrated Distributed System :
a. Metacomposites and Métamaterial
b. Operators and Architecture
3. Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells
a. Impedance Operator
b. Strategy Discretization onto a set of active cells
c. Integrated active skin
d. Experimental Results
e. Comparison with classical strategies
4. Conclusions
3dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Introduction
How can we optimize the vibroacoustical energy flux inside complex systems ?
4dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Introduction
ActuatorsVibroAcoustical
SystemSensors
Intégration des Systèmes
Control
Algorithm
Multiphysics Modeling
Multidisciplinary competencies
Technologies developments
Acoustic, Mechanic, Electronic, Automatic, Mathematics…
Integrated Systems
Communication
Energy
Communication
Energy
5dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Introduction
Structural Control : decentralized strategy
Collocated Active Control
(FEMTO-ST / PSA [Monnier 2001])
Results :
• Design Variables and Optimization tools
• Experimental characterization and prototypes
Decentralized
Control
Gi(jw)
Damping
6dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Introduction
Structural Control : Centralized strategy
Centralized Control:
G(jωωωω,C,B)
Semi-distributed Active control
(FEMTO-ST / LCPC [Ratier 2000])
Shaker
Sign
al C
ondi
tion
er
SC
ADC
State estimators
G DAC Amplifier
Nœuds
Mode 4
Sensor 1
Sensor 2
Sensor 3
Sensor 4
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5−120
−100
−80
−60W−Norm : ome=0.1
No
rm in
dB
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5−200
−150
−100
−50W−Norm : ome=0.3
No
rm in
dB
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5−200
−150
−100
−50W−Norm : ome=0.6
No
rm in
dB
time in s
Results :
• Designs variables, modal filtering techniques
• Experimental characterization and validation
7dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Introduction
A new approach…
Whatever be the wanted vibroacoustical properties (transparency, absorption, reflexion…) we propose a new
approach :
To directly optimize the structural constitutive relationships as Hybride composite structures (active/passive) by
using a distributed set of smart cells including transducers and control electronics…
Summary :
These systems have difficulties to find ‘industrial Applications’ :
� Numerical and technologicapl complexity
� Difficult to include into the design process
� Energy Cost
=> We can propose a new approch…
G
GG
G
GG
GGGG
GG
Z(iω)Z(iω)
Cell
Z(iω) Z(iω)
Z(iω)Z(iω) Z(iω) Z(iω)
Z(iω)Z(iω) Z( iω) Z(iω)
Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)
Cell
Z(iω)Z(iω)
Cell
Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω) Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)
Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω) Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω) Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)
Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω) Z( iω)Z( iω)Z( iω) Z(iω)Z(iω)Z(iω)
8dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Integrated Distributed System :
Metacomposites and Métamaterial
operator
« constitutive relationship »
Concept of «Adaptive Genreralized Impedance»
G : Spatio-temporal
Differential or Pseudo-Differencial Operator
Medium 2
Transducers
Hybrid Distributed Interface
Medium 1Incoming Flow
Reflected Flow
Transmitted Flow
Gi(ωωωω) Gi+2(ωωωω) Gi+3(ωωωω)Gi-1(ωωωω) Harvested Flow
9dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Integrated Distributed System :
Metacomposites and Métamaterial
Liu Z. et al. “Locally Resonant Sonic Materials” Science, Vol. 289, September 2000, pp. 1734-1736.
N. Fang et al., “Ultrasonic Metamaterials With Negative Modulus” Nature Materials, Vol. 5, June 2006, pp. 452-456
10dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Integrated Distributed System :
Operators and Architecture
Architectures for distributed smart cells and Control Operators
Order 1 centralized
control
Gi(jωωωω,jkx,jky)
Centralized Control:
G(jωωωω,jkx,jky)Decentralized
Control
Gi(jωωωω)
11dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells
Impedance Operator
The Objectives: Theoretical Aspects
Input Energy Transmitted Energy
y
x0
=
Initial System
Active Skin
Active Skin
Transfer
0
y
x
Transmitted Energy ≈ 0
Controlled Equivalent Systems
or
Input Energy > Transmitted Energyy
0 x
What are these controlling PDEs?
12dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
We search :
So that : Kxr ≤ 0
u(x,t)=G(p(x,0,t))
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells
Impedance Operator
x
y
Active Boundary0
Acoustic Domain
Input WavesFree Reflected Waves
ixk
iyk
rxk
ryk
Controlled Reflected Waves
),(),( 0 txwtxu &&ρρρρ−−−−====
13dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells
Impedance Operator
One can prove that all interacting waves areSo as : kx< 0
EDP of the coupled system :
Control law (Advection):
EDP of the controlled system
Order 1 centralized
control
Gi(jωωωω,jkx,jky)
M Collet, P. David, M. BerthillierActive acoustical impedance using distributed elect rodynamical transducers, Journal of Acoustical Socie ty of America, 125(2), 882–894, 2009
14dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Discret Control law :
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells
Strategy Discretization onto a set of active cells
Controlling Loudspeaker Microphones
Gi(jω)Gi-1(jω) Gi+1(jω)vipk pk+1
Mono-modal modelling ofThe used LP :
15dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells :
Integrated active skin
P. David, M. Collet, J. M. Cote,Experimental implementation of acoustic impedance c ontrol by 2D network of distributed smart cells, Sm art Materials and Structures, Accepter , 2009
16dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells :
Experimental Results
-30 dB max
Needed Power < 20 W
Contrôlé
Non Contrôlé
17dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Energy comparison with X-Filtered LMS strategy :
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells :
Comparison with classical strategies
18dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Implementation of acoustic impedance control by 2D network of
distributed smart cells :
Comparison with classical strategies
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
10-6
10-5
10-4
input power
frequency (Hz)
acou
stic
inte
nsity
no contLMSDistr
Power Flow comparison :
ΓΓΓΓ
∂∂∂∂∂∂∂∂⋅⋅⋅⋅==== ∫∫∫∫ΓΓΓΓ d
iRe
2
1*
n
ppI r
ρωρωρωρω
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 200010
-18
10-16
10-14
10-12
10-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
output power
frequency (Hz)
acou
stic
inte
nsity
no contLMSDistr
19dMems 2010, BesançonJuin 2010
Conclusions
Adaptive distributed Structures/SystemsAdaptive distributed Structures/Systems
Smart Electro-acoustical cellsSmart Electro-acoustical cells
Passive, semi-active or active ControlPassive, semi-active or active Control
Wave’s dispersion / Diffusion ControlWave’s dispersion / Diffusion Control
Developed ConceptsDeveloped Concepts
FEM Multiphysics ModellingFEM Multiphysics Modelling
MF range approach and broadband efficiencyMF range approach and broadband efficiency
Circuits SynthesisCircuits Synthesis
Toward the composite integration…Toward the composite integration…
ResultsResults
Application for more complex systemApplication for more complex system
LF / MF / HF ApproachLF / MF / HF Approach
Technological integration => Fusion ?Technological integration => Fusion ?
Hybride version including passive materialsHybride version including passive materials
FuturFutur
Experimental test on more complex systemsExperimental test on more complex systems