Comprehensive School Improvement Plan

21
Comprehensive School Improvement Plan Charles R. Drew High School 2016 2017 Vision Statement The vision of Clayton County Public Schools is to be a district of excellence preparing ALL students to live and compete successfully in a global society. Mission Statement The mission of Clayton County Public Schools is to be accountable to all stakeholders for providing a globally competitive education that empowers students to achieve academic and personal goals and to become college and career ready, productive, responsible citizens.

Transcript of Comprehensive School Improvement Plan

Comprehensive School Improvement Plan

Charles R. Drew High School

2016 –2017

Vision Statement

The vision of Clayton County Public Schools is to be a district of excellence preparing ALL students

to live and compete successfully in a global society.

Mission Statement The mission of Clayton County Public Schools is to be accountable to all stakeholders for providing a globally competitive education that empowers students to achieve academic and personal goals and

to become college and career ready, productive, responsible citizens.

P a g e 2 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

District-Wide Expectations for Comprehensive School Improvement Plans

Utilize the schools’ pertinent data such as CCRPI data to make instructional decisions and prioritize strategic actions and

monitoring protocols.

Performance goals should be written as specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals using goal

setting formulas.

Include action steps that address Clayton County Public Schools’ instructional priorities: Literacy Across the Curriculum,

Numeracy Across the Curriculum, Integrating Technology, and Critical Thinking in the comprehensive plan.

Action steps for training (professional development), weekly collaborative planning, implementing S.T.A.R.T.S. and Explicit

Instruction need to be included.

A formative assessment system with data analysis should be included in the action steps for all applicable goals.

Plan action steps for necessary interventions based on academic and behavioral data (i.e. subgroup data, placed or retained

students, reading interventions, and the Behavior Big 7 Report).

Consult the Technology Department before purchasing hardware or software to support an action step.

Formatting: Times New Roman, 10 font, updated revision date

In various school meetings such as administrative, leadership, data, grade level and collaborative planning sessions, schools

should regularly review Comprehensive School Improvement Plans and make revisions as needed. District level reviews will

occur periodically – August/September 2016, January 2017, and May 2017.

P a g e 3 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Principal: Gary Townsend

Assistant Principal(s): Stephanie Trice, William Silveri, Nezetta Johnson

School Leadership/Improvement Team

Name Position

Dennis Truitt Instructional Facilitator

Tanganyike Wilson Math Department Chair

Quinnisha Marion ELA Department Chair

Kenneth Chong Science Department Chair

Emory Arnold CTAE Department Chair

Chet Davis World Language Department Chair

Tina Shatto/ Brian Barrington DES Department Chair

Cheyne Rittenberry Social Studies Department Chair

Major Larry Taylor ROTC

Erica Wimberly Teacher

Cornelius Polk Teacher

Johne Battle Teacher

Sharien Muhammad Lead Counselor

Radhika Nataraj Teacher

Marchete Nimes Media Specialist

Rebecca Wing Teacher

P a g e 4 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

High School Data Profile

CCRPI Score

2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2020 Goals

Overall CCRPI Score: 52.6 Overall CCRPI Score: 62.3

2016 Goal: 61.0 2019 Goal: 68.5

2017 Goal: 63.5 2020 Goal: 71.0

2018 Goal: 66.0

Overall CCRPI Goals based on the following formula:

CCPRI Performance Goals

For each year during the five-year Strategic Waiver School System term, formerly

the Investing in Educational Excellence (IE2), with the baseline year 2015-2016,

____School will increase its College and Career Ready Performance Index (CCRPI)

score with Challenge Points by 3% of the gap between the baseline year CCRPI

score and 100.

𝑰𝑬𝟐 𝑨𝒏𝒏𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝑮𝒓𝒐𝒘𝒕𝒉

= (100 − 2016 𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑃𝐼 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑒 (𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑠))

× 0.03

Example

Baseline

CCRPI

Score

Expected

Annual

Growth

Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5

65

(100 –

65)(.03)

65 +

1(1.05)

65 +

2(1.05)

65 +

3(1.05)

65 +

4(1.05)

65 +

5(1.05)

1.05 66.05 67.1 68.15 69.2 70.25

Achievement Points Earned:

34.1/60

Achievement Points Earned:

23.2/50

Progress Points Earned:

13.5/25

Progress Points Earned:

33.6/40

Achievement Gap Points

Earned:

5/15

Achievement Gap Points

Earned:

5/10

Challenge Points Earned:

0/10

Challenge Points Earned:

.5/10

P a g e 5 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Academic Achievement

Goal 1: To increase academic achievement for all students in Clayton County Public Schools as evidenced by state, national, and international assessment results.

ELA Performance Goals:

A) Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding 9th grade Literature to

40% in the Content Mastery portion of our CCRPI score. This will exceed the

expected growth of 35%.

B) Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding American Literature to

48% in the Content Mastery portion of our CCRPI score. This will exceed the

expected growth of 35%

C) Ensure that the 95% participation rate is met.

D) Increase the overall pass rate of students in World Literature by 5% each

semester.

E) Increase the overall pass rate of students in British Literature by 5% each

semester.

F) Increase the number of DES students passing each level of English by 5% each

semester.

CCRPI Alignment:

HS Indicator 1. Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones Ninth Grade Literature EOC (required

participation rate ≥ 95%)

HS Indicator 2.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones American Literature EOC (required participation

rate ≥ 95%)

HS Indicator 14.Percent of students achieving a Lexile measure greater than or

equal to 1275 on the Georgia Milestones American Literature EOC

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

All ELA teachers will utilize the Explicit

Instruction Model, implement realistic daily

learning targets, and utilize essential questions

to address the overall unit focus

Septemb

er 2016

–May

2017

Administration,

Dept. Chairs,

Instructional

Facilitator

TKES observations, Department Chair visits,

Content Coordinator visits

Language Arts Teacher

Leader Professional

Learning Community

Sept 3rd, 2015

P a g e 6 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

All ELA teachers will utilize Constructive

Response Questioning and Comparative

Analysis techniques to promote and engage

students in higher level thinking

Septemb

er 2016

Administration,

Dept. Chairs,

Instructional

Facilitator

Student’s use of graphs and charts. Student’s

ability to use comparisons, contrasts, causes,

effects, changes, and the skill to state a

generalization, conclusion, explanation or

prediction.

Early release day

workshops, Instructional

Facilitator content area

meetings

Monitor student attendance data monthly to

ensure attendance accuracy. (Enrollments,

withdrawals, suspension, etc…)

Aug

2016 .-

May

2017

Mr. Silveri,

Registrar,

Counseling

dept.

$1000

Prizes

(Partners in

Ed)

Posted information in data room will be reviewed

weekly by administration and Instructional

Facilitator.

MyOn Reports, STAR Reading Lexile Reports,

Benchmark Data, Pre/Post Test Data.

School wide MyOn

Training – September 2016

All ELA teachers will review Lexile scores of

their students and monitor monthly readings

and test scores

August

2016 to

May

2017

READ180 and

Language Live

online programs

IEP meetings, Progress reports, parent

communication logs

Bi-weekly monitoring of DES students to assist

them in reaching typical and/or high growth

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mrs. Shatto,

Case Managers

Minutes of collaborative planning sessions, Grade

level meeting notes, data room participation will be

discussed with administration during bi-weekly

leadership team meetings.

Benchmark, SLO data, classroom performance data

retrieved from Edutrax; SLDS usage.

Teacher use of data

collection forms that will

be posted in the data room

– September 2016

Increase the use and monitoring of data to

guide instruction and remediation.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Tracking

Form

Check point- Monthly Data Room Evidence

There will be close monitoring of students who

fall in the lower 25th percentile on common

summative, benchmark, and formative

assessments.

Septemb

er 2016-

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Online

Resources

Weekly lesson plans; information/formal

observations

Collaborative planning as

scheduled

Teachers will utilize technology throughout the

week to engage students during the

instructional period

January

2017 to

May

2017

Instructional

Facilitator;

Administrative

Team

P a g e 7 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Implement an after school and Saturday

Scholar Academy which will offer remediation

based on student needs in ELA (to include

current failing students).

October

2016 –

May

2017

T. Wilson Title 1 Benchmark Data, SLO Data, Classroom

Performance Data, EOC

Content specific best

practices for student

improvement;

Ensure all students have knowledge and

materials of all credit recovery opportunities

Septemb

er 2016

to May

2017

Counseling

Department

Varied Credit Recovery Applications

Goal 1: To increase academic achievement for all students in Clayton County Public Schools as evidenced by state, national, and international assessment results.

P a g e 8 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Math Performance Goals:

A) Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding Algebra I to 15% in the

content mastery section of our CCRPI as compared to Coordinate Algebra in

2014. This will exceed the expected growth of 35%.

B) Increase the percentage of student meeting/exceeding Geometry to 30% in the

content mastery section of our CCRPI as compared to Analytical Geometry in

2014. This will exceed the expected growth of 35%.

C) Ensure the 95% participation rate is met.

D) Increase the overall percentage of students passing Advance Algebra by 5% for

2015-2016 as compared to Math III in 2014 each semester.

E) Increase the overall percentage of students passing Advance Decision Making by

5% for 2015-2016 as compared to Math IV in 2014 each semester.

F) Increase the number of DES students passing each level of Math by 5% each

semester.

CCRPI Alignment:

HS Indicator 3.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones Algebra I/Coordinate Algebra EOC (required

participation rate ≥ 95%)

HS Indicator 4.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones Geometry/Analytic Geometry EOC (required

participation rate ≥ 95%)

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

All Math teachers will utilize the Explicit

Instruction Model, implement realistic daily

learning targets, and utilize essential questions

to address the overall unit focus

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mrs. Trice,

Dept. Chairs,

Instructional

Facilitator S.

TKES observations, Department Chair visits,

Content Coordinator visit

Content specific training

from district PD catalog

All Math teachers will utilize Constructive

Response Questioning and Comparative

Analysis techniques to promote and engage

students in higher level thinking.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Dept. Chairs,

Instructional

Facilitator

Student’s use of graphs and charts. Student’s

ability to use comparisons, contrasts, causes,

effects, changes, and the skill to state a

generalization, conclusion, explanation or

prediction

Early release day

workshops, Instructional

Facilitator content area

meetings

Monitor student attendance data monthly to

ensure attendance accuracy. (Enrollments,

withdrawals, suspension, etc

August

2016 to

May

2017

Muhammad,

Lead Counselor

Master schedule

P a g e 9 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Enroll all 9th and 10th grade students in Math

Support class as it pertains to Algebra and

Geometry to provide additional math

curriculum exposure and support

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Minutes of collaborative planning sessions, Grade

level meeting notes, data room participation will be

discussed with administration during bi-weekly

leadership team meetings.

Benchmark, SLO data, classroom performance data

retrieved from Edutrax; SLDS usage

Increase the use and monitoring of data to

guide instruction and remediation.

Septemb

er 2016-

May

2017

Instructional

Facilitator;

Administrative

Team

Tracking

Form

Check point- Monthly Data Room Evidence

There will be close monitoring of students who

fall in the lower 25th percentile on summative,

benchmark, and common assessments.

January

2017 to

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Weekly lesson plans; information/formal

observations

Collaborative planning as

scheduled

Teachers will utilize technology throughout the

week to engage students during the

instructional period

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Online

Resources;

GIZMOS

Weekly lesson plans; information/formal

observations

Collaborative planning as

scheduled

Bi-weekly monitoring of DES students to assist

them in reaching typical and/or high growth

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mrs. Shatto,

Case Managers

IEP meetings, progress reports, parent

communication logs Benchmark Data, Classroom

Achievement Data

Implement an after school and Saturday

Scholar Academy which will offer remediation

based on student needs in Mathematics (to

include current failing students).This will assist

in addressing the CCPS instructional priority of

Numeracy Across the Curriculum.

October

2016 –

May

2017

T. Wilson Title 1 Benchmark Data, SLO Data, Classroom

Performance Data, EOC

Connections to the Standards of Mathematical

Practices will be made during instruction to

increase conceptual understanding and

mathematical proficiency.

January

2015 –

May

2017

Site Facilitator;

Administrative

Team

District

Resources

Informal/formal observations

P a g e 10 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Implementation of FLP to address student

needs

October

2016 to

May

2017

Mrs. Trice,

Mrs.

Muhammad,

Teachers TBA

Title I FLP applications, informational posters and

meetings.

FLP Professional Training

TBA

Ensure all students have knowledge and

materials of all credit recovery opportunities

Septemb

er 2016

to May

2017

Counseling

Dept.

Varied Credit Recovery Applications

Goal 1: To increase academic achievement for all students in Clayton County Public Schools as evidenced by state, national, and international assessment results.

Science Performance Goals:

A) Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding Biology to 42% in the

Content Mastery portion of our CCRPI score. This will exceed the expected

growth of 35%.

B) Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding Physical Science to 13.5%

in the Content Mastery portion of our CCRPI score. This will exceed the

expected growth of 35%.

C) Ensure the 95% participation rate is met.

D) Increase the overall number of students passing all other Science courses

(Chemistry, Physics, Human Anatomy, Environmental) by 5% each semester.

E) Increase the overall number of DES students passing Science by 5% each

semester.

CCRPI Alignment:

HS Indicator 5.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones Physical Science EOC (required participation

rate ≥ 95%)

HS Indicator 6.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones Biology EOC (required participation rate ≥

95%)

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

All Science teachers will utilize the Explicit

Instruction Model, implement realistic daily

learning targets, and utilize essential questions

to address the overall unit focus.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Dept. Chair,

Instructional

Facilitator

TKES observations, Department Chair visits,

Content Coordinator visits

Content Training for

Biology, Physics, Physical

Science.

Dates TBA

P a g e 11 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

All Science teachers will utilize Constructive

Response Questioning and Comparative

Analysis techniques, and lab reports to promote

and engage students in higher level thinking.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Dept. Chairs,

Instructional

Facilitator

Student’s use of graphs and charts. Student’s

ability to use comparisons, contrasts, causes,

effects, changes, and the skill to state a

generalization, conclusion, explanation or

prediction.

Early release day

workshops, Instructional

Facilitator content area

meetings

Monitor student attendance data monthly to

ensure attendance accuracy. (Enrollments,

withdrawals, suspension, etc

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mr. Silveri,

Registrar,

Counseling

dept.

Students will be placed in Biology based on

their CRCT scores and prior academic

performance. Those that show a need for

support, will be placed in Environmental

Science in preparation for Biology in 10th

grade.

Septemb

er 2016

S. Muhamad

Lead Counselor

Administration

N. Johnson

Instructional

Facilitator

Tracking

Form

Schedules of 9th grade students.

Increase the use and monitoring of data to

guide instruction and remediation.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Minutes of collaborative planning sessions, Grade

level meeting notes, data room participation will be

discussed with administration during bi-weekly

leadership team meetings.

Benchmark, SLO data, classroom performance data

retrieved from Edutrax; SLDS usage

There will be close monitoring of students who

fall in the lower 25th percentile on summative,

benchmark, and common assessments

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Dept. Chair

Check point- Monthly Data Room Evidence Collaborative planning –

first Thursday of the month

Teachers will utilize technology throughout the

week to engage students during the

instructional period.

Septemb

er 2016-

May

2017

Instructional

Facilitator;

Administrative

Team

Online

Resources;

GIZMOS

Weekly lesson plans; information/formal

observations

Bi-weekly monitoring of DES students to assist

them in reaching typical and/or high growth.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mrs. Shatto,

Case Managers

IEP meetings, progress reports, parent

communication logs Benchmark Data, Classroom

Achievement Data

P a g e 12 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Implement a after school and Saturday Scholar

Academy which will offer remediation based

on student needs in Science (to include current

failing students).

October

2016 –

May

2015

T. Wilson Title 1 Benchmark Data, SLO Data, Classroom

Performance Data, EOC

Ensure all students have knowledge and

materials of all credit recovery opportunities

Septemb

er 2016

to May

2017

Counseling

Dept

Varied Credit Recovery Applications

Goal 1: To increase academic achievement for all students in Clayton County Public Schools as evidenced by state, national, and international assessment results.

Social Studies Performance Goals:

A. Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding Economics to 75% in the

Content Mastery portion of our CCRPI. This will exceed the expected growth of

35%.

B. Increase the percentage of students meeting/exceeding US History to 35% in the

Content Mastery portion of our CCRPI. This will exceed the expected growth of

35%.

C. Ensure the 95% participation rate is met.

D. Increase the overall number of students passing all other Social Studies courses

(American Government, World History, Psychology) by 5% each semester

E. Increase the overall number of DES students passing Social Studies by 5% each

semester.

CCRPI Alignment:

HS Indicator 7.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones US History EOC (required participation rate ≥

95%)

HS Indicator 8.Weighted percent of students scoring at Developing Learner or

above on the Georgia Milestones Economics EOC (required participation rate ≥

95%)

P a g e 13 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

All Social Studies teachers will utilize the

Explicit Instruction Model, implement realistic

daily learning targets, and utilize essential

questions to address the overall unit focus.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mr. Silveri, N.

Johnson

Instructional

Facilitator

TKES observations, Department Chair visits,

Content Coordinator visits

Social Studies Teaching

and Learning Labs

TBA

All Social Studies teachers will utilize

Constructive Response Questioning,

Comparative Analysis techniques, and

Document Based Questions (DBQs) to promote

and engage students in higher level thinking.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Administration,

Dept. Chairs,

Instructional

Facilitator

Student’s use of graphs and charts. Student’s

ability to use comparisons, contrasts, causes,

effects, changes, and the skill to state a

generalization, conclusion, explanation or

prediction.

Early release day

workshops, Instructional

Facilitator content area

meetings

Monitor student attendance data monthly to

ensure attendance accuracy. (Enrollments,

withdrawals, suspension, etc…)

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mr. Silveri,

Registrar,

Counseling

Dept.

Based on student needs, a re-alignment of

Social Studies teachers was developed to allow

teachers to teach to their strengths.

August

2016

S. Muhamad

Lead Counselor

Administration

N. Johnson

Instructional

Facilitator

Master schedule

Increase the use and monitoring of data to

guide instruction and remediation.

August

2016 to

May

2017

Thompson,

Bostic,

Williams,

Taylor

Dep. Chair

School

Administration

Tracking

Form

Minutes of collaborative planning sessions, Grade

level meeting notes, data room participation will be

discussed with administration during bi-weekly

leadership team meetings.

Benchmark, SLO data, classroom performance data

retrieved from Edutrax; SLDS usage

P a g e 14 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

There will be close monitoring of students who

fall in the lower 25th percentile on summative,

benchmark, and common assessments.

Septemb

er 2016-

May

2017

Instructional

Facilitator;

Administrative

Team

Online

Resources

Check point- Monthly Data Room Evidence Collaborative planning as

scheduleed

Teachers will utilize technology throughout the

week to engage students during the

instructional period

Septemb

er 2016-

May

2017

Instructional

Facilitator;

Administrative

Team

Weekly lesson plans; information/formal

observations

Bi-weekly monitoring of DES students to assist

them in reaching typical and/or high growth

August

2016 to

May

2017

Mrs. Shatto,

Case Managers

Implement an after school and Saturday

Scholar Academy which will offer remediation

based on student needs in Social Studies (to

include current failing students).

October

2016 –

May

2017

T. Wilson Title 1 Benchmark Data, SLO Data, Classroom

Performance Data, EOC

Ensure all students have knowledge and

materials of all credit recovery opportunities

Septemb

er 2016

to May

2017

Counseling

Dept.

Varied Credit Recovery Applications

Safe-Orderly-Secure Learning Environments

Goal 2: To provide and maintain a safe, orderly and secure learning environment.

P a g e 15 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Performance Goals:

A. Develop and implement a comprehensive school safety plan

B. Drew High School will reduce the number of suspension/expulsions by 10% from 271 to

244 by end of SY 2016

CCRPI Alignment:

HS Exceeding the Bar Indicator 9.School or LEA Research/Evidence-based

Program/Practice designed to facilitate a personalized climate in the school:

examples include but are not limited to Teachers as Advisors program; mentoring

program; Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS); service-learning

program; peer mediation; conflict mediation.

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

Establish comprehensive safety plan and

educate entire staff on implementation.

July –

August

2016

Administrative

Team

SRO, Chief

Cox

N/A Staff showing the knowledge of safety plans and

having full understanding on how to implement our

plan without injury or incident to students, staff or

stakeholders.

School Safety Plan, School

Building and Layout,

General Safety precautions

and procedures.

Conduct monthly fire drills, annual tornado

drills, hostile intruder drills, and all other safety

drills necessary

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrative

Team, SRO,

Chief Cox

N/A Staff and students participating and utilizing proper

procedures in case of an emergency

School safety plans,

building layout and general

safety precautions will be

discussed during

designated faculty

meetings.

Improved sign in procedures will be developed

and implemented for all visitors.

Ongoing Administrative

Team, SRO,

Front Office

Staff

Assigned

Escorts when

needed

General Sign in sheets, Labels and badges, IDENTI-Kid

software

P a g e 16 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Continue to utilize our MTSS team to ensure

implementation of the MTSS plan

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrative

Team, MTSS

Team

General Negative behaviors will be decreased through a

system of positive reinforcement and progressive

discipline

MTSS

Monitor discipline data and implementation of

school wide discipline plan

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrative

Team, MTSS

Team

General Ensure proper implementation of MTSS and

decrease incidents that require OSS/ISS by 10%

MTSS

Engagement of All Stakeholders

Goal 3: To create an environment that promotes active engagement, accountability, and collaboration of all stakeholders to maximize student achievement.

Performance Goals:

Increase community involvement in the academic achievement of students. Have 100%

participation upon staff members with our PTSA. Increase our volunteer list by 10%

CCRPI Alignment:

School Climate--The School Climate Star Rating is calculated using data from

the Georgia Student Health Survey 2.0, Georgia School Personnel Survey,

Georgia Parent Survey, student discipline data and attendance records for

students, teachers, staff and administrators.

P a g e 17 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

Solicit additional business and community

partners

August

2016 –

May

2017

Parent Liaison

Administrators

Title I Provided support from community and stakeholders

for student incentives and support.

List of all current Partners in Ed

N/A

Conduct a needs assessment survey for all

stakeholders and implement programs/services

to meet needs

Septemb

er 2016 –

May

2017

Administrators,

Media

Specialist,

Parent Liaison

N/A Survey Results

List of community needs

PTSA/LSC Membership list

Volunteer List

N/A

Effective Communication

P a g e 18 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Goal 4: To effectively communicate the system's vision and purpose and allow stakeholder involvement in an effort to build understanding and support.

Performance Goals:

A. Increase communication between school and stakeholders.

B. Increase Connect Ed service by 10%.

C. Have 100% of our staff members create teacher websites.

CCRPI Alignment:

School Climate--The School Climate Star Rating is calculated using data from

the Georgia Student Health Survey 2.0, Georgia School Personnel Survey,

Georgia Parent Survey, student discipline data and attendance records for

students, teachers, staff and administrators.

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

Principal will have a minimum of 3 informal

chats with parents to discuss their appreciations

and concerns with Drew High School.

October

2016,

February

2017

April

2017

Administration N/A Parent sign in sheets, Agendas, Flyers, Connect-Ed

transcripts

There will be a 9th grade parent meeting prior

to the distribution of the 9 week progress

reports to discuss strategies that will assist in

their students successfully completing their first

and second semester of high school.

October

2016

March

2015

Administration,

Counseling,

9th grade

teachers

Sign in sheets, Agendas, prior progress reports

There will be a parent meeting for all Advance

Placement students to discuss expectations,

rigor, AP scoring and its possible impact on

college credits.

April

2017

Administration,

Counseling

Sign in sheets, Agendas, prior progress reports

Effectively utilize Connect Ed, district

translators, marquee, school website to

communicate with parents and community

March

2015

Mrs. Echols,

Parent Liaison

Connect Ed Transcripts

Use of District Translators

Updated Marquees

Teacher Websites

P a g e 19 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

All teachers will have an up to date and

operational web-site for parent and student use.

October

2016

All Staff

members

Teacher’s sites posted to CDHS web-site. Teacher web-site training.

Organizational Processes

Goal 5: To provide high quality support services delivered on time and within budget to promote student academic success in the Clayton County Public Schools.

Performance Goals:

A. Increase fiscal responsibility in all areas.

B. Have 100% of staff members trained on fiscal responsibility.

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

Implement and train all staff (teachers,

coaching staff, club/organization sponsors) on

fiscal responsibility, fund raising guidelines,

and financial procedures and monitor on a

weekly basis

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrators,

Athletic

Director,

Bookkeeper

N/A Balanced accounts for all accounts and increased

fiscal responsibility. Principal will meet with

bookkeeper monthly to go over financial reports.

N/A

P a g e 20 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Utilize student achievement data to guide

purchases

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrators N/A Increased student achievement through the

purchase/implementation of support materials,

programs, and services

N/A

Highly Qualified and Effective Staff

Goal 6: To recruit and retain highly qualified and effective staff.

Performance Goals:

Recruit, hire, and develop high quality employees who support academic achievement and

the overall wellbeing of students.

CCRPI Alignment:

School Climate--The School Climate Star Rating is calculated using data from

the Georgia Student Health Survey 2.0, Georgia School Personnel Survey,

Georgia Parent Survey, student discipline data and attendance records for

students, teachers, staff and administrators.

P a g e 21 | 21 Revised 09/06/16

Action Steps/ Tasks

Timeline

Project

Leader(s) and

School Level

Person(s)

Monitoring

Resources/

Funding Related Artifacts and Evidence

Professional Learning

Activity and Date

(where applicable)

Adhere to ethical and professional hiring

practices

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrators N/A Hire highly effective employees and monitor

ongoing progress through TKES process

N/A

Implement a structured system of support and

development for new and returning staff

August

2016 –

May

2017

Administrators,

Instructional

Facilitator,

Teacher,

Leaders

District PD

Funds, Title I

Mentor assignments, Monthly meetings with new

teachers and administration, Faculty recognition of

accomplishments, list of all professional

development courses attended

New Teacher Induction

Program, Ongoing PD with

staff

Implement best practices for the teacher

evaluation process.

August

2016 -

May

2017

Administrators N/A TKES evaluations, teacher and leader feedback,

mid-year and summative conferences

Evaluation Instrument

Training