Discriminated Induction of SOS Functions in Escherichia coli by Alkylating Agents
Acquisition of resistance to antitumor alkylating agent ACNU: a possible target of positron emission...
Transcript of Acquisition of resistance to antitumor alkylating agent ACNU: a possible target of positron emission...
www.elsevier.com/locate/nucmedbio
Nuclear Medicine and
Acquisition of resistance to antitumor alkylating agent ACNU:
a possible target of positron emission tomography monitoring
Hideya Kawaia,c, Jun Toyoharab,d, Hirotsugu Kadoc, Takao Nakagawaa, Shinji Takamatsud,
Takako Furukawad, Yoshiharu Yonekurad, Toshihiko Kubotaa, Yasuhisa Fujibayashid,4aDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan
bRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry Section, Department of Medical Imaging, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba 263-8555, JapancResearch Institute of Brain and Blood Vessels, Akita 010-0874, Japan
dBiomedical Imaging Research Center, University of Fukui, Fukui 910-1193, Japan
Received 2 August 2005; received in revised form 2 October 2005; accepted 4 October 2005
Abstract
Early detection of tumor response to chemotherapy is of great importance for appropriate treatment of tumors. In this study,
characteristics of two positron emission tomography (PET) tracers, [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) and[18F]3V-fluoro-3V-deoxy-thymidine (FLT), in the early detection of tumor cell response as well as tolerance development to chemotherapy was compared using rat
C6 glioma cells and 1-(4-amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl)-methyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)-3-nitrosoureahydrochloride (ACNU). ACNU is an
alkylating agent known to induce drug resistance through expression of O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic acid methyl transferase
(O6-MGMT). We established an ACNU-resistant C6 glioma cell line (C6/ACNU) and investigated the effect of ACNU on the uptake of
FLT and FDG. In C6 cells, DNA synthesis presented as [3H]thymidine ([3H]Thd) incorporation into DNA was quickly suppressed by
ACNU. In C6/ACNU cells, the suppression was recovered promptly, indicating that DNA alkylation occurs initially but highly expressed
O6-MGMT repairs DNA, leading to the recovery of DNA synthesis. The patterns of FLT uptake in C6 and C6/ACNU were difficult to
distinguish in the very early stage of the treatment, though it was reported that FLT uptake well correlated with proliferation in certain
conditions. FDG uptake showed different patterns between the resistant and control cells, with significantly decreased uptake in C6 cells
and unchanged uptake in C6/ACNU cells at 18–24 h after the treatment. Though difficult to be directly translated into clinical situation,
the present study will provide a base to develop an appropriate protocol to assess tumor response to treatment by PET and to design
effective treatment plans.
D 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Drug resistance; Glioma; Thymidine; PET; FLT; FDG
1. Introduction
Treatment of malignant tumor consists of surgical
operation, radiation therapy, chemotherapy or their combi-
nation. Among them, chemotherapy plays an important
role especially in the treatment of recurrent, metastatic or
nondissectible tumors. However, selection of antitumor
agents as well as dosage and schedule of the treatment is
still based on personal experiences of each doctor or
hospital, and establishment of an evidence-based decision
making protocol is required. At present, therapeutic effect
can only be evaluated by volumetric change in X-ray CT
0969-8051/$ – see front matter D 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.10.002
4 Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 776 61 8430; fax: +81 776 61 8170.
E-mail address: [email protected] (Y. Fujibayashi).
or MRI, which requires more than a month after
completion of the therapy. In addition, tumor cells can
develop resistance against a specific agent or a group of
agents. Thus, early detection of tumor response to
chemotherapy is of great importance for appropriate
treatment of tumors.
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a noninvasive
technique that can expose molecular processes in cells and
biological characteristics of tumors [1]. In general, changes
in such molecular processes during therapy precede
anatomical changes in tumor tissue so that PET can be a
useful tool to detect the very early response of tumor cells to
chemotherapy [1,2]. Tumor cells are known to have
accelerated energy requirement and high growth rate.
Among the available molecular probes for PET, [18F]2-
Biology 33 (2006) 29–35
H. Kawai et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 33 (2006) 29–3530
fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) [3] and [18F]3V-fluoro-3V-deoxy-thymidine (FLT) [4] have been proposed as markers
of glycolysis representing energy consumption and DNA
synthesis representing cell growth, respectively. There have
been several reports comparing these two tracers for
qualitative diagnosis of tumors [5–8].
In this study, characteristics of these two PET tracers in
the early detection of tumor cell response as well as
tolerance development to chemotherapy were compared
using rat C6 glioma cells as a tumor cell line and 1-(4-
amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl)-methyl-3-(2-chloroethyl)-3-
nitrosoureahydrochloride (ACNU) (nimustine hydrochlo-
ride) as a chemotherapy agent. ACNU is commonly used
for glioma patients [9], but acquisition of drug resistance
by the tumor cells causes serious problems in cancer
chemotherapy using ACNU [10]. ACNU is a non-P-
glycoprotein-mediated drug, and resistance to ACNU is
independent of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression. Thus,
noninvasive detection of P-gp expression using monoca-
tionic radiopharmaceuticals such as [99mTc]MIBI is not
useful for monitoring ACNU treatment. We established an
ACNU-resistant C6 glioma cell line (C6/ACNU) for this
study and investigated the effect of ACNU on the uptake
of FLT and FDG by the cells with or without the tolerance
to provide a basis for the detection of cellular response to
ACNU treatment as well as detection of tolerance
development by PET.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Radiochemicals and chemotherapeutic agent
[Methyl-3H(N)]3V-fluoro-3V-deoxy-thymidine ([3H]FLT,
229.4 GBq/mmol; 37 MBq/ml) and [5,6-3H]deoxy-2-
fluoro-d-glucose ([3H]FDG, 2.22 TBq/mmol; 37 MBq/ml)
were purchased from American Radiolabeled Chem-
icals, St. Louis, MO. [Methyl-3H]thymidine ([3H]Thd,
2.92 TBq/mmol, 37 MBq/ml) was purchased from Amer-
sham Biosciences, Amersham, UK. A chemotherapeutic
agent, 1-(4-amino-2-methyl-5-pyrimidinyl)-methyl-3-(2-
chloroethyl)-3-nitrosoureahydrochloride (nimustine hydro-
chloride), was supplied by Sankyo (Tokyo, Japan). ACNU
was dissolved at 1.0 mg/ml in distilled water and stored as a
stock solution in the dark at �208C.
2.2. Cell line and cell culture
The C6 rat glioma cell line was obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. The cells
were grown at 378C in a humidified atmosphere containing
5% CO2 in F-10 nutrient mixture medium (GIBCO, Grand
Island, NY) supplemented with 15% horse serum (GIBCO)
and 5% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Logan,
UT). A C6 subline resistant to ACNU was established anew
by continuously exposing the C6 cell line to gradually
increasing concentration of ACNU, according to the
previously reported method [11].
2.3. Growth inhibitory effect of ACNU on C6 and C6/ACNU
glioma cells in vitro
The cytotoxicity of ACNU on C6 and C6/ACNU glioma
cells were examined by trypan blue dye exclusion method.
The C6 or C6/ACNU glioma cells (1�104) were plated in a
24-well plate (Falcon, Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ)
with 1.0 ml of F-10 nutrient mixture medium (GIBCO)
supplemented with 15% horse serum (GIBCO) and 5% fetal
bovine serum (Hyclone Laboratories), and cultured at 378Cfor 24 h in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Then, the
cells were treated with indicated concentrations of ACNU
for 72 h. The cells in each well were trypsinized, and viable
cell number was analyzed by the trypan blue dye exclusion
method. The drug concentration required for the 50%
inhibition of cell growth (IC50) at 72 h ACNU treatment
was determined by plotting the logarithm of the drug
concentration vs. the growth rate of the treated cells.
2.4. RT-PCR analysis of O6-methylguanine-
deoxyribonucleic acid methyl transferase
The expression of O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic
acid methyl transferase (O6-MGMT), a key enzyme for the
establishment of resistance to ACNU [12–14], was analyzed
by the RT-PCR method, as previously reported [15], with
some modification using cyclophilin as housekeeping gene
expression control. In brief, total RNA was extracted from
cultured glioma cells according to the manufacturer’s
instructions for TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA). Two micrograms of total RNA was converted to
single-strand cDNA using the first-strand cDNA synthesis
kit (Amersham Biosciences). The resulting cDNA was
subjected to PCR analysis. The PCR amplification mixture,
in a final volume of 25 AL, consisted of 1� Taq DNA
polymerase buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 AMof each specific primer and 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase
(Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The cycle number was chosen such that amplification of the
products was in the liner range with respect to the amount of
input cDNA. Each cycle consisted of 30 s at 948C for
denaturation, 30 s at 608C for annealing and 60 s at 728C for
extension. The PCR products were stained with ethidium
bromide after agarose gel electrophoresis and photographed
using Polaroid film type 667. The sequences of specific
primers were as follows:
O6-MGMT
(sense): ATTAGCAGCCCTGGCAGGCAACCC
(antisense): GAAGACTCGAAGGATGGCTTGAGCC
Cyclophilin
(sense): GGGGAGAAAGGATTTGGCTA
(antisense): AGAGATTACAGGGTATTGCGAG
2.5. Cell uptake studies
The C6 or C6/ACNU cells (1.0�104) were plated in a
24-well plate with 1.0 ml of the culture medium described
Fig. 1. RT-PCR analysis of O6-MGMT in C6 and C6/ACNU cells.
H. Kawai et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 33 (2006) 29–35 31
above for 48 h. Then, the cells were treated with the medium
containing ACNU (0, 1, 5 and 10 Ag/ml) for 1, 3, 6, 12,
18 and 24 h. After the treatment, the cells were washed
twice with cold fresh medium, then the medium was changed
to the uptake medium containing [3H]FLT or [3H]FDG and
incubated for 1 h. Thymidine-free minimum essential
medium (GIBCO) was used for [3H]-FLT studies, and
glucose-free RPMI1640 (GIBCO) was used for [3H]-FDG
studies to avoid the influence from carrier Thd or glucose.
The cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) three times, lysed by 0.5 ml of 0.2 N NaOH, mixed
with liquid scintillation cocktail (ACS II, Amersham
Biosciences) and the radioactivity was measured with a
liquid scintillation counter (LSC-5100, Aloka, Tokyo,
Japan). Protein concentration was determined by DCP
protein assay kit (Bio-rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
Relative uptake of the tracer was expressed as disintegra-
tions per minute per milligram protein and compared to
those of untreated controls.
2.6. DNA synthesis analysis
[3H]Thd incorporation into DNA after ACNU treatment
was measured to analyze the primary response to ACNU
treatment. Protocol for [3H]Thd uptake studies followed the
protocol for [3H]FLT uptake studies. After incubation,
[3H]Thd incorporation into DNA was measured following
the method described by Ayusawa et al. [16]. Briefly, the
Fig. 2. The effect of ACNU treatment (1–10 AM) on the cell number in C6 (A) and
studies, 1 S.D.) at each time point.
cells were washed with cold PBS for three times and treated
with 5% trichloroacetic acid, then the residue was washed
with cold 70% ethanol. Acid-insoluble fraction was
collected by centrifugation, dissolved in 0.5 ml 0.2 N
NaOH, then mixed with liquid scintillation cocktail (ACS II,
Amersham Biosciences). The radioactivity was measured
with a liquid scintillation counter (LSC-5100, Aloka).
The cell viability and protein concentration were
determined by trypan blue dye exclusion method and DCP
protein assay kit (Bio-rad Laboratories), respectively.
Relative uptake of the tracer was expressed as disintegra-
tions per minute per milligram protein.
3. Results
3.1. Establishment of C6/ACNU
C6 glioma cells were cultured under the presence of
ACNU to establish ACNU-resistant cell line. When the
treatment was started, the majority of the cultured cells
died, but some survived and started to proliferate
gradually. ACNU concentration was increased stepwise un-
til the IC50 value of the surviving cells reached 26.8 Ag/ml,
approximately 10 times higher than that of the parent
C6 cells (3.68 Ag/ml), and used as C6/ACNU. The
doubling times of C6 and C6/ACNU cells were 18.5 and
20.6 h, respectively. RT-PCR analysis revealed that the
expression of O6-MGMT, a key enzyme for ACNU-
resistance, was higher in C6/ACNU cells compared to
that in C6 cells (Fig. 1).
3.2. The effect of ACNU on cell viability
The effect of ACNU on cell viability in C6 and C6/
ACNU cells is shown in Fig. 2A and B. In all ACNU
dose conditions studied, viable cell numbers of both C6
and C6/ACNU cells were unchanged up to 12 h after
C6/ACNU (B) cell lines. Data are expresses as % of control (average of five
Fig. 3. The effect of ACNU treatment (1–10 AM) on the [3H]Thd incorporation into DNA in C6 (A) and C6/ACNU (B) cell lines. Data are expressed as % of
control (average of five studies, 1 S.D.) at each time point.
H. Kawai et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 33 (2006) 29–3532
treatment when compared to untreated controls. Then, only
C6 cells showed decrease in cell number when treated with
5–10 Ag/ml ACNU.
3.3. The effect of ACNU on DNA synthesis
In the present study, [3H]Thd incorporation into DNA
was used as a marker of DNA synthesis. Fig. 3A shows the
% of [3H]Thd incorporation into acid-insoluble fraction after
various duration (1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h) and concentration
(1, 5 and 10 Ag/ml) of ACNU treatment in C6 cells
compared to untreated controls. DNA synthesis under
10 Ag/ml of ACNU was suppressed to 50%, 30% and
20% of the control at 1, 18 and 24 h of treatment,
respectively. Suppression was dose-dependent in the range
of 1–10 Ag/ml of ACNU.
In C6/ACNU cells, time course of [3H]Thd incorporation
into DNA showed completely different patterns from those
in control C6 cells (Fig. 3B). In C6/ACNU cells, [3H]Thd
Fig. 4. The effect of ACNU treatment (1–10 AM) on the [3H]FLT uptake in C6 (A)
five studies, 1 S.D.) at each time point.
incorporation into DNA was suppressed to 80% and 58%
after 1 and 3 h of treatment with 10 Ag/ml of ACNU,
respectively. Similar suppression was found also in lower
ACNU concentration groups. However, in longer incubation
periods, [3H]Thd incorporation into DNA was gradually
recovered to the control level.
3.4. The effect of ACNU on [3H]FLT uptake
Fig. 4A and B shows the % control of [3H]FLT uptake
after various duration (1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h) and
concentration (1, 5 and 10 Ag/ml) of ACNU treatment in C6
and C6/ACNU cells, respectively. In C6 cells, [3H]FLT
uptake was transiently increased to 120–140% of control
after ACNU treatment for 3–6 h, then decreased to 60–40%
after 24 h of treatment. The increase and decrease seemed to
be dose dependent. In C6/ACNU cells, on the other hand,
the increase was found only in the very early stage, namely,
1 h of treatment, then gradually decreased to 80–60% of the
and C6/ACNU (B) cell lines. Data are expressed as % of control (average of
Fig. 5. The effect of ACNU treatment (1–10 AM) on the [3H]FDG uptake in C6 (A) and C6/ACNU (B) cell lines. Data are expressed as % of control (average
of five studies, 1 S.D.) at each time point.
H. Kawai et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 33 (2006) 29–35 33
controls. Nevertheless, both C6 and C6/ACNU cells showed
similar response pattern to ACNU after 18 h of treatment.
3.5. The effect of ACNU on [3H]FDG uptake
Fig. 5A and B shows the % control of [3H]FDG uptake
after various duration (1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h) and
concentration (1, 5 and 10 Ag/ml) of ACNU treatment in C6
and C6/ACNU cells, respectively. In C6 cells, ACNU
treatment brought complicated response in the early stage
of the treatment but significant suppression in the late stage.
In C6/ACNU cells, on the contrary, high-dose ACNU
treatment induced transient increase of [3H]FDG uptake (5,
10 Ag/ml ACNU, 3 h of treatment), then the uptake went
back to the control level.
4. Discussion
Human glioma usually shows intrinsic multidrug resis-
tance through the expression of membrane-associated P-gp
MDR-1 on stromal vessels [17]. Thus, a non-P-gp-mediated
drug such as ACNU (nimustine hydrochloride) is commonly
used for glioma treatment. ACNU is a cell-cycle-indepen-
dent alkylating agent, which adds a methyl group to DNA
and causes point mutations, mismatch repair or DNA
interstrand cross-links [18], as a result, causing impairment
of DNA synthesis. It is reported that cellular resistance to
antitumor nitrosoureas, such as ACNU, links with the
expression level of O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic
acid methyl transferase (O6-MGMT), which transfers a
methyl group from O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic
acid to repair damaged DNA [12]. Experimentally,
ACNU-resistant glioma cell line can be established by
continuous exposure to ACNU, and the resultant resistant
cells express high level of O6-MGMT [10]. O6-MGMT
expression is also found in nontumor cells and works for
repair of damaged DNA formed by N-nitroso carcinogens
[19]. In tumor patients, expression levels of O6-MGMT in
glioblastoma were inversely correlated with their survival
[20]. Thus, detection of resistance to ACNU in the early
stage of the treatment, in relation to O6-MGMT expression
and DNA synthesis, is of great importance. In the present
study, the C6/ACNU we established (C6/ACNU) was
confirmed to express O6-MGMT mRNA at a high level as
expected, indicating that the resistance to ACNU was
induced through DNA repair by O6-MGMT and provided
a suitable model to study the biochemical changes found in
the resistant cells treated with ACNU.
The effect of ACNU on viable cell number was found
only in C6 cells and only after 18 h of treatment.
Biochemical changes steering cellular responses to ACNU
should occur preceding or accompanying cell death, and
they will make crucial information for prognosis and further
therapy design if properly captured. In the present study, we
focused on the biochemical changes in viable cells by
careful washing of the treated cells after incubation to
remove the contamination of dead cells and expressing the
data as bradioactivity (disintegrations per minute) per
milligram protein.QIn C6 cells, DNA synthesis presented as [3H]Thd
incorporation into DNA was quickly suppressed by ACNU
treatment. This finding agreed well with the proposed
anticancer mechanism of ACNU. In C6/ACNU cells, on the
other hand, DNA synthesis was transiently suppressed after
ACNU treatment but recovered promptly. This finding
indicated that DNA alkylation occurs by ACNU treatment
initially, but highly expressed O6-MGMT repairs DNA,
leading to the recovery of DNA synthesis to the control
level. Thus, monitoring DNA synthesis after acute ANCU
treatment is considered to be useful to identify whether
tumor cells are responders or not.
Fluorine-18-FLT has been developed as a PET tracer for
imaging cell proliferation [4,21]. FLT is believed to be
retained in cells because of specific phosphorylation by the
cell-cycle-regulated enzyme, cytosolic TK1 [22]. TK1
H. Kawai et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 33 (2006) 29–3534
normally functions in the nucleoside salvage pathway to
convert thymidine to thymidine monophosphate, an essen-
tial step before its incorporation into DNA, and the
metabolic trapping of FLT by phosphorylation is considered
to be an indicator of DNA synthesis activity, even though
only a small amount of FLT is actually incorporated into
DNA [22]. On this point, FLT as a DNA synthesis marker
has been proposed to be analogous to FDG as a glycolysis
marker. At least, it has been demonstrated that TK1 activity
is an important determinant of FLT uptake and retention in
cells [23,24].
In the present study, the changes in FLT uptake after
acute ACNU treatment showed complicated patterns in
response to ACNU treatment, which were completely
different from those in [3H]Thd incorporation into DNA.
The transient increase in FLT uptake, possible reflection of
transient induction of TK1 activity, might be a compensation
reaction of the cells to the suppressed DNA synthesis.
Interestingly, both C6 and C6/ACNU cells showed transient
increase, though with slightly different time course; then at
24 h after treatment, both cell lines resulted in suppressed
FLT uptake in a dose-dependent manner. There have been
several reports indicating that FLT uptake well correlated
with proliferation in steady state or spontaneous growth
condition [25,26]. This can be attributed to close correlation
between TK1 activity and cell proliferation under those
conditions. However, in acute suppression of DNA synthe-
sis by DNA alkylation, it is possible or likely that a
compensation system steps in to induce TK1 activity
transiently and, as a result, increase FLT uptake, bringing
in a discrepancy between FLT uptake and proliferation. In
this condition, [3H]Thd uptake itself should be enhanced
also, but amount of [3H]Thd incorporated into DNA should
be decreased because DNA synthesis itself is suppressed.
Dittman et al. [27] reported that cellular FLT uptake in the
early stage of chemotherapy may not reflect the extent of
proliferation inhibition. Our present finding also supports
their conclusion. Decreased uptake of FLT at 24 h found in
resistant C6/ACNU as well as C6 cells was also interesting,
but the mechanism awaits further investigation.
FDG is the most popular PET imaging agent in oncology
as a general marker of energy metabolism. In the present
study, FDG also did not show a well-ordered response
pattern to ACNU in the very early stage of treatment,
namely, bbefore cell-deathQ period (1–12 h). After that, FDG
uptake in C6 cells treated with 5–10 Ag/ml ACNU decreased
significantly at 18–24 h of treatment. This decrease was
comparable to that found in FLT uptake under the same
treatment. On the other hand, C6/ACNU cells showed no
change in FDG uptake, whereas significantly decreased
uptake of FLT was observed under the same condition.
In conclusion, DNA synthetic rate seems to be a good
marker of acquired drug resistance to alkylating agent in
viable cells as Thd uptake showed clearly different patterns
between the resistant and control cells under the treatment.
However, selection of PET tracers for the detection of DNA
synthesis after acute ACNU treatment requires detailed
evaluation. In addition, several factors other than the uptake
by viable tumor cells, such as presence of necrosis and
inflammatory cells in tumor mass, crucially affect the uptake
of radiotracers by tumor mass in in vivo imaging, so our
result cannot be directly applied to clinical situation.
However, present study will provide a base to develop an
appropriate protocol to assess tumor response to treatment
by PET and to design effective treatment plans.
Acknowledgments
This study was partly supported by the 21st Century
COE program bBiomedical Imaging Technology Integration
ProgramQ from Japan Society of the Promotion of Science
(JSPS), grants-in-aid for scientific research (no. 17209041)
from JSPS and research and development project aimed at
economic Revitalization (Leading Project) bResearch and
Development of Technology for Measuring Vital Functions
Merged with Optical TechnologyQ from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
(MEXT) Japan.
References
[1] Haioun C, Itti E, Rahmouni A, Meignan M, Reyes F. PET scan in the
therapeutic strategy. Hematol J 2004;5(Suppl 3):S149–53.
[2] Vaidyanathan G, Zalutsky MR. Imaging drug resistance with radio-
labeled molecules. Curr Pharm Des 2004;10(24):2965–79.
[3] Gaa J, Rummeny EJ, Seemann MD. Whole-body imaging with PET/
MRI. Eur J Med Res 2004;9(6):309–12.
[4] Shields AF, Grierson JR, Dohmen BM, Machulla HJ, Stayanoff JC,
Lawhorn-Crews JM, et al. Imaging proliferation in vivo with [18F]FLT
and positron emission tomography. Nat Med 1998;4(11):1334–6.
[5] Sugiyama M, Sakahara H, Sato K, Harada N, Fukumoto D, Kakiuchi
T, et al. Evaluation of 3V-deoxy-3V-18F-fluorothymidine for monitoring
tumor response to radiotherapy and photodynamic therapy in mice. J
Nucl Med 2004;45(10):1754–8.
[6] van Waarde A, Cobben DC, Suurmeijer AJ, Maas B, Vaalburg W,
de Vries EF, et al. Selectivity of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG for
differentiating tumor from inflammation in a rodent model. J Nucl
Med 2004;45(4):695–700.
[7] Buck AK, Halter G, Schirrmeister H, Kotzerke J, Wurziger I, Glatting
G, Mattfeldt T, et al. Imaging proliferation in lung tumors with PET:
18F-FLT versus 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2003;44(9):1426–31.
[8] Barthel H, Cleij MC, Collingridge DR, Hutchinson OC, Osman S,
He Q, et al. 3V-Deoxy-3V-[18F]fluorothymidine as a new marker for
monitoring tumor response to antiproliferative therapy in vivo with
positron emission tomography. Cancer Res 2003;63(13):3791–8.
[9] Shibui S. Randomized controlled trial on malignant brain tumors —
activities of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Brain Tumor Study
Group. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2004;44(4):220–1.
[10] Saito Y, Hotta T, Mikami T, Kurisu K, Kawamoto K, Kiya K, et al.
Establishment of ACNU-resistant rat gliosarcoma cell lines and their
characteristics. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1991;31(13):846–52.
[11] Thomale J, Huh NH, Nehls P, Eberle G, Rajewsky MF. Repair of
O6–ethylguanine in DNA protects rat 208F cells from tumorigenic
conversion by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
1990;87(24):9883–7.
[12] Mineura K, Fushimi S, Kowada M, Isowa G, Ishizaki K, Ikenaga M.
Linkage between O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
(O6-MT) activity and cellular resistance to antitumour nitrosoureas
H. Kawai et al. / Nuclear Medicine and Biology 33 (2006) 29–35 35
in cultured rat brain tumour cell strains. Acta Neurochir (Wien)
1990;103(1–2):62–6.
[13] Karran P, Lindahl T, Griffin B. Adaptive response to alkylating agents
involves alteration in situ of O6-methylguanine residues in DNA.
Nature 1979;280(5717):76–7.
[14] Kabuto M, Kubota T, Kobayashi H, Nakagawa T, Kitai R. The
antitumor effect of MX2, a new morpholino anthracycline, against
malignant glioma cell lines and its subcellular distribution. Neurosur-
gery 1995;37(3):471–6 [discussion 476–7].
[15] Mineura K, Watanabe K, Yanagisawa T, Kowada M. Quantification of
O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase mRNA in human brain
tumors. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996;1289(1):105–9.
[16] Ayusawa D, Shimizu K, Koyama H, Kaneda S, Takeishi K, Seno T.
Cell-cycle-directed regulation of thymidylate synthase messenger
RNA in human diploid fibroblasts stimulated to proliferate. J Mol
Biol 1986;190(4):559–67.
[17] Takamiya Y, Abe Y, Tanaka Y, Tsugu A, Kazuno M, Oshika Y, et al.
Murine P-glycoprotein on stromal vessels mediates multidrug
resistance in intracerebral human glioma xenografts. Br J Cancer
1997;76(4):445–50.
[18] Wang J, Chen Z, Xia X, Lu D, Xue J, Ruan C. Improvement of
combination chemotherapy tolerance by introduction of polycistronic
retroviral vector drug resistance genes MGMT and MDR1 into human
umbilical cord blood CD34+ cells. Leuk Res 2002;26(3):281–8.
[19] Engelbergs J, Thomale J, Rajewsky MF. Role of DNA repair in
carcinogen-induced ras mutation. Mutat Res 2000;450(1–2):139–53.
[20] Anda T, Shabani HK, Tsunoda K, Tokunaga Y, Kaminogo M,
Shibata S, et al. Relationship between expression of O6-methyl-
guanine-DNA methyltransferase, glutathione-S-transferase pi in
glioblastoma and the survival of the patients treated with nimustine
hydrochloride: an immunohistochemical analysis. Neurol Res 2003;
25(3):241–8.
[21] Krohn KA, Mankoff DA, Eary JF. Imaging cellular proliferation as a
measure of response to therapy. J Clin Pharmacol 2001;2001(Suppl):
96S–103S.
[22] Kong XB, Zhu QY, Vidal PM, Watanabe KA, Polsky B, Armstrong D,
et al. Comparisons of anti-human immunodeficiency virus activities,
cellular transport, and plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of
3V-fluoro-3V-deoxythymidine and 3V-azido-3V-deoxythymidine. Anti-
microb Agents Chemother 1992;36(4):808–18.
[23] Rasey JS, Grierson JR, Wiens LW, Kolb PD, Schwartz JL. Validation
of FLT uptake as a measure of thymidine kinase-1 activity in A549
carcinoma cells. J Nucl Med 2002;43(9):1210–7.
[24] Grierson JR, Schwartz JL, Muzi M, Jordan R, Krohn KA. Metabolism
of 3V-deoxy-3V-[F-18]fluorothymidine in proliferating A549 cells:
validation for positron emission tomography. Nucl Med Biol 2004;
31:829–37.
[25] Buck AK, Schirrmeister H, Hetzel M, Von Der Heide M, Halter G,
Glatting G, et al. Neumaier, 3-deoxy-3-[18F] fluorothymidine-positron
emission tomography for noninvasive assessment of proliferation in
pulmonary nodules. Cancer Res 2002;62(12):3331–4.
[26] Toyohara J, Waki A, Takamatsu S, Yonekura Y, Magata Y,
Fujibayashi Y. Basis of FLT as a cell proliferation marker:
comparative uptake studies with [3H] thymidine and [3H] arabino-
thymidine, and cell-analysis in 22 asynchronously growing tumor cell
lines. Nucl Med Biol 2002;29(3):281–7.
[27] Dittmann H, Dohmen BM, Kehlbach R, Bartusek G, Pritzkow M,
Sarbia M, et al. Early changes in [18F] FLT uptake after chemotherapy:
an experimental study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;
29(11):1462–9.