Teaching Abstract statistics in Online Education
Transcript of Teaching Abstract statistics in Online Education
http://ssc.sagepub.com/Social Science Computer Review
http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/27/2/271The online version of this article can be found at:
DOI: 10.1177/0894439308327129
2009 27: 271 originally published online 29 December 2008Social Science Computer ReviewMichael L. Vasu and Ali O. Ozturk
Computer SimulationTeaching Methodology to Distance Education Students Using Rich-Media and
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
can be found at:Social Science Computer ReviewAdditional services and information for
http://ssc.sagepub.com/cgi/alertsEmail Alerts:
http://ssc.sagepub.com/subscriptionsSubscriptions:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.navReprints:
http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.navPermissions:
http://ssc.sagepub.com/content/27/2/271.refs.htmlCitations:
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Teaching Methodology to DistanceEducation Students UsingRich-Media and ComputerSimulationMichael L. VasuAli O. OzturkNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
This article addresses the two major issues involved in the teaching of an introductory
methodology course versus face-to-face instruction. The first issue incorporates a rich-
media solution, specifically streaming video, to precede traditional notes on any topic and
second the use of a computer simulation software created by the authors, which can be placed
on a matriculated distance education student’s desktop remotely, without the legal or logistical
problems of using commercial software, for example, Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences (SPSS) or Statistical Analysis Software (SAS). Technical and pedagogical dimen-
sions of these particular issues are discussed as well.
Keywords: distance education; computer simulation; software; pedagogy; research
methodology
Instructors involved in teaching introductory courses in public opinion and political sci-
ence methodology are confronted with the need to incorporate computer-based materials
into their courses. For face-to-face students, there are abundant alternatives.1 However, for
distance education (DE) courses where students are not required to come to the campus and
are located in time zones, literally, throughout the world, computer applications section of
the course creates a series of logistical, legal, and pedagogical problems for the methodol-
ogy instructor. In addition to the desire to provide the hands-on experience with computer
analysis, methodology instructors must accomplish the traditional objectives of imparting
various methodological concepts (e.g., the effects of a control variable on a bivariate rela-
tionship) as well as confront the problem of teaching various statistical and methodological
concepts to an audience whose mathematical maturity and preparation are usually very
heterogeneous.
Research emerging from a number of studies has recently uncovered insights with
respect to the financial parameters and the technological needs and desires of DE stake-
holders (faculty, students, and administrators). In their recent study including seven univer-
sity campuses around the nation, Jafari, McGee, and Carmean (2006) determine that DE
stakeholders are eagerly waiting for light, nimble, mobile, smart, helpful, and intuitive
Authors’ Note: Please address correspondence to Michael Vasu, NCSU Box 8102, Raleigh, NC 27695;
e-mail: [email protected]
Social Science Computer Review
Volume 27 Number 2
May 2009 271-283
# 2009 SAGE Publications
10.1177/0894439308327129
http://ssc.sagepub.com
hosted at
http://online.sagepub.com
271
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
teaching and learning technology systems (Howell, Williams, & Lindsay, 2003). To this list,
we would add the issue of the cost for DE delivery (Taylor, Vasu, Vasu, & Steelman, 2002).
We have found that our public opinion research methodology DE course is significantly
enhanced if traditional lecture notes can be augmented with rich media, in particular video
that can be updated at will (literally daily). This video allows the instructor to explain con-
cepts such as sampling, the null hypothesis, statistical significance, and so on in a video for-
mat, which is then reinforced in lecture online. This also allows the instructor to present the
material in a preview, view, and review formats thus giving instructors the light, nimble,
mobile, smart, helpful, and intuitive teaching and learning technology systems they desire.
In our view, any DE course is enhanced if traditional lecture notes can be augmented with
rich media, in particular video that can be updated at will (frequently in response to student’s
questions). However, in our view, this technology is particularly useful in methodology
courses that seek convey concepts such as control, sampling, the null hypothesis, statistical
significance, and so on for a constituency with whom you will only have contact online.
It has been, and in many ways still is, a significant challenge to develop and use a
technology that could satisfy all the needs and desires of the DE faculty and students.
This is particularly true for social science curriculums in terms of embracing the challenge
of applying technology to the teaching–learning process (Nufrio, 2007). Indeed, the search
for better strategies significantly depends on the available hands-on and user-friendly DE
technologies that will ensure simplicity in presentation creation and in delivery to DE
faculty while providing flexibility in managing students’ time. We believe MediaSite goes
a long way toward achieving these previously mentioned objectives.
Designing an Online Public Opinion Research Course
With the initiation of the University’s first entirely DE BA degree completion program
(Leadership in the Public Sector), we were approached to convert a survey research meth-
odology course—originally developed for on-campus political science major students—
into the DE format. As the literature suggests, there is a typical series of steps in course
development of this type (Care & Scanlan, 2001; Ko & Rossen, 2004). The first step of the
conversion process was very time-consuming in terms of creating electronic versions of
entire course notes, assignments, and other relevant materials including the course syllabus
and book review formats.
During the second stage of course design, we chose Blackboard Vista, an online course
delivery platform made available to our DE faculty. We started with the configuration of the
course materials (such as lecture notes, syllabus, supplemental written materials, discussion
board protocols, assignments, and final exam content) within Blackboard Vista. Blackboard
Vista offered significantly useful teaching and course management tools; these tools them-
selves are inadequate to elaborate relatively complex topics and assignments of our meth-
odology course. Therefore, we supplemented our course content with additional streaming
videos to build an online, media-rich learning platform using Blackboard Vista and
MediaSite tools and systems.
MediaSite is used to create course presentations incorporated in our course lecture mod-
ules located in the course homepage.2 Accordingly, students were asked to watch a lecture
272 Social Science Computer Review
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
presentation that introduces the subject of a particular lecture module before reading the
lecture notes or doing any lecture activities. DE students can watch and listen to their
instructor’s presentation live or on-demand while following any additional presentation
supplements. In our view, MediaSite goes a long way toward what distance educators want
in terms of learning technology systems (Jafari et al., 2006).
Figure 1 shows an example of MediaSite live presentation outlook for one of the lecture
presentations. In this case, one of the authors in this article presents the lecture along with
slides automatically provided by the MediaSite recorder via a document camera hooked up
to another computer showing our online course content (Vasu and Ozturk, 2008).
Using the Elaboration Model Simulation
At this point, we will turn to our use of a simulated data set that we used in teaching the
logic of causal analysis to undergraduate DE students called the Elaboration Model.3 We
agree with Earl Babbie (2006, p. 422) that the Elaboration Model is one of the best ways
of explaining causal analysis in the social sciences using contingency table analysis as a
precursor to more multivariate concepts. The software is called the Elaboration Model in
that it takes a great deal of its form from the model of the same name, which dates back
to the pioneering work of Paul Lazarsfeld (1982). The basic structure of the simulation/
Figure 1
Lecture Video Screen Produced Via MediaSite
Vasu, Ozturk / Teaching Methodology to Distance Education Students 273
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
software is to comprehend the relationship between the two variables after the introduction
of a ‘‘test’’ or ‘‘control’’ variable and then observe the effect on the original relationship.
Additionally, the simulation asks the student to identify whether the control variable is
intervening or antecedent to the two variables in the original bivariate relationship. Once
this is established, the student is asked to examine and define the outcome of the problem
posed. The program was designed to produce output that indicates whether the partial rela-
tionships (relationships in the control tables after the introduction of the control variable)
are statically significant. The partial relationships can remain the same, go away, or the par-
tial table can be split with one relationship remaining statistically significant and the other
becoming nonsignificant.
These outcomes in the Elaboration Model, which are the effect of controlling the third
variable, are defined as
1. Replication, which is the case whenever the partial relations remain essentially the same as the
original relationship, regardless of whether the control variable is antecedent or intervening.
2. Explanation is the terminology used to identify a spurious relationship that can be shown
to be false because the partial relationships are greatly reduced or go away when the con-
trol variable is introduced. Additionally, the control or test variable can be shown to be
antecedent, preceding in a time order, compared to the original bivariate relationship.
3. Interpretation is the relationship in which the introduction of the control variable results in
a reduced partial relationship but unlike a spurious relationship, the time order has a dif-
ferent effect in that the control variable can be defined as intervening between the two
variables in the original relationship.
4. The final outcome is specification in which the partial tables are different in that one par-
tial relationship is strong (statistically significant in our simulation) and other partial rela-
tionship becomes insignificant or greatly reduced. Additionally, the third or test or control
variable can be either antecedent or intervening.
Our simulation of the Elaboration Model is essentially a data set that is a numerical
matrix programmed so that a specific mathematical model underlies the actual construction
of the simulation.4 The simulated data set software (also called the Elaboration Model) we
discuss in this article has a variety of underlining mathematical models built into it, such
that each expresses specific statistical properties designed to address specific heuristic
objectives. The statistical topics we have chosen (statistical significance, control, linearity,
etc.) are designed to cover topics commonly covered in introductory methodology and sta-
tistics books. The entire simulation also includes examples of replication, interpretation,
specification, and elaboration. The student is asked to read and evaluate a problem. The
assignment comes at a point in the course where the student has been introduced to sam-
pling, statistical significant versus substantive importance, and various statistical tests
and measures.
Outline of Student Assignment
The assignment is essentially a research problem that involves a description of a set of
events as well as the questions and instructions necessary to generate a codebook and
274 Social Science Computer Review
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
various other materials. For the purpose of this article, we will present only a subset of
the simulation designed to express only one aspect of the Elaboration Model.5 As we have
indicated, North Carolina State University (NCSU) uses a remote data access developed,
under the leadership of one of the authors, for graduate courses that do significantly more
computer analysis than do undergraduate courses. Moreover, these students are typically
local students, Remote Computing Network (RCN) takes pressure off of already crowded
student labs and finally avoids logistical and legal issues—pertaining to commercial statis-
tical software—specific to DE as well. Pedagogically, our initial findings appear to us that
the simulation of data analysis designed to define and describe the policy implications for
the outcome works very well for undergraduates.6 Although each computer lab assignment
varies slightly, this example will provide the reader with a sense of how the simulated data
set is employed.
A Research Problem to Analyze: School Board Policy
Let us assume that you are employed as a policy analyst by the County School District,
which has taken a simple random survey of all high school seniors in the district. The
County School Board is interested in answering some questions about the high school
seniors to allocate resources for programs, equipment, teachers, and so on during the
upcoming year. The survey data, along with the data from school records, have been com-
bined into a large data set. Assume that this database is on the computer that you will be
using.
You have been assigned the task of analyzing some of the data that have been collected
according to following four scenarios:
A. The School Board is interested in learning more about delinquency of high school seniors.
B. The School Board wants to know whether money should be spent to provide some type of
after-hours supervision for students to reduce delinquency.
C. Some critics of sex-education classes in high school have said that sex-education classes
have led to more pregnancies and abortions and have changed the attitudes of high school
seniors. The Board is interested in knowing whether sex education makes any differences
in attitudes or whether there are other influences on attitudes.
D. The Board is interested in the changing attitudes and the role of women in society.
Assuming that the underlying distribution of the variables is normal, answer the
following questions:
1. Specify the independent variable (IV) and dependent variable (DV) in this data set and
specify the reasons that lead you to this conclusion.
2. Using your knowledge of �2, interpret the tables and indicate whether the bivariate rela-
tionship is statistically significant. In your final answer, relate your statistics back to the
original hypothesis put forth by the researchers.
3. Reexamine the original relationship; is the relationship between IV and DV the same
across both levels of the control variable?
Vasu, Ozturk / Teaching Methodology to Distance Education Students 275
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
4. How would you describe this relationship with respect to the four categories of the
Elaboration Model outlined in class?
Answers Given to Students After Assignment is Turned In
After collecting the students’ online submissions, instructors post the following
responses to the course locker. Because of space limitations, we include a complete set
of responses for the first scenario (A) only. However, for the other scenarios (B, C, and
D), the Elaboration Model outputs and brief descriptions are provided to the reader.
(A.) The School Board wants to know whether money should be spent to provide some
type of after-hours supervision for students to reduce delinquency. Run another crosstab of
10 and 9. Next, run a crosstab of 10 and 9 with 8 as control.
(A.1) The IV is the parents’ work status (yes, no). The DV is delinquency (yes, no).
Among the reasons that this is the case is that the IV is the variable that is isolated as influ-
encing or producing changes in the DV. (In our discussion of IVs whose values are contin-
uous, we have stated that changes in the values of the IV produce or result in changes in the
values of the DV.) Obviously, the IV must precede the DV in a time-order sense. In the
above example, the father and mother working outside the home is assumed to be associated
with delinquency in that a strong agent in the socialization process is not available in the
home.
(A.2) The relationship between parents’ working and delinquency is statistically
significant (p < .002). There is an association between the variables indicated by a variety
of measures of association provided at the bottom of the printout (such as g ¼ .40). The
relationship expressed in Figure 2 supports the research hypothesis that
the children raised in homes where both the parents work are more likely to be
delinquent than those whose parents do not work (35.8% of the former vs. 19.1% of the lat-
ter). Remember, however, that in our class discussion, we underscored the multivariate
nature of most real-world relationships.
(A.3) The effect of introducing supervision (a variable that measures ‘‘Was the child ade-
quately supervised?’’) can be expressed as follows:
Examining the first table in Figure 3, we notice that for both the parents who did work
(yes) and those who did not work (no) and whose children were not adequately supervised,
there is no statistically significant relationship between both parent working and the delin-
quency variable—in other words, the categories are statistically independent. Note, how-
ever, that the delinquency percentages have increased vis-a-vis the original bivariate table.
Examining the second table in Figure 3, we notice that again there is no statistically sig-
nificant relationship between parent working and delinquency for those whose children
were adequately supervised. In other words, the two categories are statistically independent.
Note also that across both levels of the control variable, the bivariate measure of associa-
tion, g, is low (.14425 and .06250, respectively).
(A.4) The relationship between the working parent and delinquency is the same at both
levels of the control variable. For both levels of the control variable, the relationship is
insignificant by both measures of statistical significance (�2) and the measures of associa-
tion presented at the bottom of the page. In other words, the original relationship between
276 Social Science Computer Review
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Figure 2
The Elaboration Model Crosstabulation Output
Figure 3
The Elaboration Model Crosstabulation With a Control Variable
Vasu, Ozturk / Teaching Methodology to Distance Education Students 277
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
parent working and incidence of delinquency observed in the bivariate table appears to be
‘‘explained away’’ by the introduction of the control variable supervision occurring in time.
This is clearly an example of explanation. The control variable supervision is an intervening
variable between the IV and DV. Moreover, the introduction of the control variable (third
variable) results in the elimination of the originally observed bivariate relationship across
both levels of the control variable indicating that it is the relationship between working
mothers and lack of supervision that produced the original bivariate relationship.
Other Examples of the Elaboration Simulation
(B.) The School Board is interested in learning more about the delinquency of high
school seniors. First, run a crosstab of variables X9 (did both parents work?) and X10 (was
respondent delinquent?). Second, using the crosstab of X10 and X9, introduce variable X1
(sex of the respondent) as a control.
(B.1) The following results will be obtained through the Elaboration Model assuming
students follow the directions appropriately:
The Elaboration Model Output
Independent variable: 9 (Did both parents work?)
Dependent variable: 10 (Was respondent delinquent?)
Raw �2 ¼ 12.45
Contingency coefficient ¼ 0.19962
Control variable: 1 (Sex of the respondent)
Yes: Raw �2 ¼ 4.59, contingency coefficient ¼ 0.12276
No: Raw �2 ¼ 8.34, contingency coefficient ¼ 0.16446
This is an example for replication. As already discussed, replication occurs whenever the
partial relationships are the same (same is defined in terms of statistical significance) as the
original bivariate relationship regardless of whether the test or control variable is antecedent
or intervening. In the above example, when variable 1 (sex of respondent) is introduced as a
control variable, the original relationship remains the same for all levels of the control vari-
able (i.e., the control variable has no effect).
(C.) Some critics of sex-education classes in high school have said that sex-education
classes have led to more pregnancies and abortions and have changed the attitudes of high
school seniors. The Board is interested in knowing whether sex education makes any
differences in attitudes or whether there are other influences on attitudes. First, run a cross-
tab of X13 (attitude on abortion?) and X12 (sex educational class?). Next, run a second
crosstab of X13 and X12 with X11 (is respondent Catholic?) as control.
(C.1) The following results will be obtained through the Elaboration Model assuming
students follow the directions appropriately:
The Elaboration Model Output
Independent variable: 12 (Sex educational class?)
Dependent variable: 13 (Attitude on abortion?)
Raw �2 ¼ 7.4
278 Social Science Computer Review
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Contingency coefficient ¼ 0.15515
Control variable: 11 (Is respondent Catholic?)
Yes: Raw �2 ¼ 0.35, contingency coefficient ¼ 0.03414
No: Raw �2 ¼ 0.60, contingency coefficient ¼ 0.04468
This is an example for explanation category in the Elaboration Model. Explanation is a
spurious relationship that may be ‘‘explained away’’ by the introduction of a third variable.
The control or test variable must be antecedent to both the IV and DV. The partial relation-
ship must be zero or significantly less (measured in terms of statistical significance) than
was found in the original relationship. Variables 12 (sex-education class) and 13 (attitude
on abortion) are designed to produce a statistically significant relationship. However, when
variable 11 (is respondent Catholic) is introduced, the relationship disappears for both
levels of the control variable. If these variables are to be relabeled, variable 11 must be ante-
cedent to both the IV and DV (variables 12 and 13).
(D.) The Board is interested in the changing attitudes and the role of women in
society. Run a crosstab of X6 and X1. Run a second crosstab of 6 and 1 with 7 as control.
(D.1). The following results will be obtained through the Elaboration Model assuming
students follow the directions appropriately:
The Elaboration Model Output
Independent variable: 1 (Sex of respondent)
Dependent variable: 6 (Attitude on women’s rights)
Raw �2 ¼ 15.51
Contingency coefficient ¼ 0.22172
Control variable: 7 (Does mother have a BA degree?)
Yes: Raw �2 ¼ 0.25, contingency coefficient ¼ 0.02886
No: Raw �2 ¼ 42.42, contingency coefficient ¼ 0.35197
Variables X1 (sex of respondent) and X6 (attitude on women’s rights) are designed to
produce a statistically significant relationship. When variable X7 (Does mother have a
BA degree?) is introduced as a control, one level of the original relationship remains statis-
tically significant while the other disappears completely. This is an example of specifica-
tion. When the partial relationships differ significantly from each other, that is, when one
remains statistically significant and the other does not, the result is called specification.
In other words, we have specified the conditions under which the original relationship
occurs. Specification occurs whether the test variable is antecedent or intervening.
Conclusion
This article addressed major issues in teaching methodology. First, it allowed rich-media
solutions that is nimble and user-friendly to precede traditional notes on any topic in the
syllabus and, second, it used computer simulation software created by the authors, which
can be placed on a matriculated DE student’s desktop remotely, without the legal or logis-
tical problems of using more commercial software, for example, SPSS or SAS. In our view,
MediaSite is a product that works very well on Blackboard Vista online learning
Vasu, Ozturk / Teaching Methodology to Distance Education Students 279
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
management platform. The software offers the instructor flexibility to modify DE courses at
a much quicker pace and allows a feedback process as well. In the case of teaching concep-
tual analysis using a computer program to online students, the example we chose to present
is a subset of our software, a simulated data set designed to illustrate the conceptual
approach to contingent table analysis also called the Elaboration Model. The advantage
of our simulated data set, we believe, is that it contains a research context that enables the
instructor to instill the relationship of substance to method while using computer-based
materials to students online. The model that underlies the data is known to the instructor
and can be manipulated by the instructor for a variety of purposes—not the least of which
is producing a common standard for grading the computer-generated output. The exercise
itself, we believe, provides a real-world analog to the research process that involves all its
major components. Moreover, our impressionistic feedback of the process of using the data
set and student exercises has been very favorable. Students report enjoying the search for
the right answer and the feedback we provided in our answer sheets. Those who have made
the transition to real-world data report it less traumatic after having been exposed to our
data set. Finally, our data set provides a mechanism for integrating computer-based mate-
rials into the classroom that is both pedagogically sound and logistically manageable.
(Rosenberg, M. 1968)
Appendix
Codebook for Data Set
Description Values
1. Sex of respondent (0) Male
(1) Female
(99) Missing
2. Hair length in centimeters Exact value
(99) Missing
3. District math exam score exact value (99) Missing
4. Test anxiety score exact value (99) Missing
5. Final exam score math II exact value (99) Missing
6. Attitude on women’s rights (0) Disapprove
(1) Approve
(99) Missing
7. Does mother have a BA degree? (0) No BA degree
(1) Yes BA degree
(99) Missing
8. Was respondent supervised? (0) No
(1) Yes
(99) Missing
9. Did both parents work? (0) No
(1) Yes
(99) Missing
(continued)
280 Social Science Computer Review
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Description Values
10. Was respondent delinquent? (0) No
(1) Yes
(99) Missing
11. Is respondent Catholic? (0) No
(1) Yes
(99) Missing
12. Sex-education class? (0) No
(1) Yes
(99) Missing
13. Attitude on abortion? (0) Disapprove
(1) Approve
(99) Missing
Notes
1. Our university has created a Remote Computing Network (RCN), which is a system through which
students, faculty, and staff can access lab computers remotely from their home, work, or laptops and use any
of the software that is available in walk-in classroom including, but not restricted to, SAS and SPSS.
However, for pedagogical and logistical reasons, we needed to find a solution for computer analysis that was
under our control and that would allow us to address IT problems by the end of the business day. The authors
of this article have used the RCN system to provide flexibility, access, and exposure to a wider range of applied
data sets for our face-to-face graduate students in methodology classes. However, our DE students who include
military stationed all over the world, we believed, needed a unique solution that had a high reliability, that was
under our control, and that did not require third party intervention to fix. In other words, that was highly nimble.
In addition, questions relating to our site licenses for the software for DE were also a consideration in not using
RCN. We address the pedagogical reasons for developing the Elaboration Model in the body of the article. For
more information on RCN, see http://www.chass.ncsu.edu/it/page.php?name¼index.
2. MediaSite is a media system designed to capture video of the instructions along with presentation slides
and automatically distribute the integrated rich-media presentations live over the Internet or archive them to
servers for later use. In other words, MediaSite allows professors to simply teach and stream their courses to
online students using a rack-mounted unit for permanent in-room installation or a portable unit for multilocation
(including classrooms, labs, and conferences) presentations. MediaSite recorder has capability to integrate
multiple inputs for video, audio, and digital signals—such images as output from a computer to show slides,
documents, and course content. The MediaSite system relies on Windows Media Server and captures the record-
ing as Windows Media file that could be watched through standard web browsers. The recorder configuration
submenus also include options to configure image compression for various quality levels with different
templates for dial-up or broadband users. The presentation sessions can be saved on CDs, DVDs, or USBs using
‘‘Publish-to-Go’’ function, which is significantly useful to distribute the course contents to DE students pursuing
their higher education. Overall, MediaSite is not only a user-friendly, time-saving, and low-cost rich-media
creation system but also gives DE students more flexibility in managing their time (Lipschutz, 2004), provides
interactive features of navigating, and replays particular lectures or presentations.
3. Actual software is available via the authors, which includes instructions pertaining to software installation
on students’ computers. If interested, contact Dr. Michael L. Vasu or Dr. Ali O. Oztrurk at [email protected]
or [email protected]. The total cost of the Elaboration software will be determined in the future.
4. An example will help illustrate this point. Our data set contains a correlation and linear regression module
in which the student is asked to use the Elaboration Model software to examine the linear relationship between
an IV and a DV. The original relationship has a very high positive correlation (r ¼ .89). The student is then
Vasu, Ozturk / Teaching Methodology to Distance Education Students 281
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
instructed to control for a third variable and to run separate scatterplots for two subgroups that comprise the third
variable. The examination of these separate scatterplots reveals that, in fact, no real linear relationship exists
between the IV and DV and that the observed relationship was a simple artifact of failing to control for this third
variable. The example exposes students to scattergrams, linearity, the concept of controlling a variable as well as
requiring them to use the computer. The data set currently has an N of 300 and variables that provide the basis
for a conceptual context or setting.
5. What the model is written in and how we post it to the end user. In addition to the issues raised previously
about the logistics and possible legal constraints, one specific question that any potential reader of this article
may ask is—why would one simulate a data set with all the real data available? The answer is that outside var-
ious natural science domains, and particularly in fields such as political science, sociology, and education and
psychology, real world of data often do not meet the heuristic needs of the instructor. (For example, a real-world
data set may contain an excellent example of second-order control variable, yet no examples of outliers.
Moreover, the use of a simulated data set allows the instructor to construct a very specific example of a statistical
concept—such as the effect of controlling for a third variable on an existing bivariate relationship—in a fashion
that may appear very unlikely when compared to a similar result using real-world data. One example is the abil-
ity to produce an outcome in which the introduction of a third variable clearly—and in a highly statistically sig-
nificant sense—eliminates the original bivariate relationship. We believe this approach instills a solid
conceptual framework for data analysis.
6. In addition, our data set has been designed to be incorporated into the chapters of a commonly used meth-
odology text and possesses the flexibility to be modified (e.g., the variable labels) to use examples from other
textbooks. We have found that students initially exposed to our data sets, in which the variables and values
express heuristically interesting (although simulated) relationships, find the transition to real data less traumatic.
References
Babbie, E. R. (2006). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Care, D. W., & Scanlan, J. M. (2001). Planning and managing the development of courses for distance delivery:
Results from a qualitative study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4. Retrieved
February 12, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/summer42/care42.html
Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B., & Lindsay, N. K. (2003). Thirty-two trends affecting distance education: An
informed foundation for strategic planning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 6.
Retrieved February 12, 2008, from http://www.westga.edu/%7Edistance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html
Jafari, A., McGee, P., & Carmean, C. (2006). Managing courses, defining learning: What faculty, students, and
administrators want? Educause Review, 41, 50-71.
Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2004). Teaching online: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
Company.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1982). The varied sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lipschutz, R. P. (2004). Ready, click, present. PC Magazine. Retrieved January 2008, from http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1544759,00.asp@
Nufrio, P. M. (2007). Meeting the challenge of distance learning in a public/nonprofit MPA curriculum.
International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 519-539.
Taylor, R., Vasu, E. S., Vasu, M. L., & Steelman, J. D. (2002). Cost-income equilibrium for electronically deliv-
ered instruction. Distance Education Issues and Concerns, 19, 115-128.
Vasu, M. L., & Ozturk A. (2008). A rich-media presentation solution for distance education: A review of
MediaSite. Social Science Computer Review, 26, 528-533.
Vasu, M. L., Ozturk, A. O., & Vasu E. (2007). The Elaboration Model [Software]. North Carolina State
University, School of Public and International Affairs.
282 Social Science Computer Review
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Michael L. Vasu, PhD, is a Lifetime Edelman Laureate, awarded by the Institute for Operations Research and
Management Sciences (INFORMS). He is a member of the Graduate Faculty at the School of Public and
International Affairs. He is the author of Politics and Planning and the co-author of Organizational
Behavior and Public Management and Effective Program Practices For At-Risk Youth: A Continuum of
Community – Based Programs. He has written 20 technical paper and monographs, and over 30 peer-
reviewed articles. He is the former President of the Southern Association for Public Opinion Research.
Ali O. Ozturk, PhD, is the Director of Leadership in the Public Sector Online B.A. degree completion program
at the School of Public and International Affairs, North Carolina State University. He is also teaching leadership
and methodology courses as an assistant teaching professor in LPS program. He received his PhD in public
administration from School of Public and International Affairs in 2005. His research and teaching interests
include contemporary public management, public sector leadership, public sector organizational culture,
e-government, and survey research. His e-mail is [email protected]
Vasu, Ozturk / Teaching Methodology to Distance Education Students 283
at NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV on April 20, 2011ssc.sagepub.comDownloaded from