Natural Philosophy - Forgotten Books
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of Natural Philosophy - Forgotten Books
NATURAL PHILOSOPHY ,
BE ING
HEADS OF LECTURES
DEL IVERED IN THE UN IV ERSITY OF ED INBURGH,
JOHN I’LAYFAIR,
PEOFESSOI OF NATURAL PE ILOSOPHY IN THE UN IVERSITY OF EDINBURGH,
FELLOWOF THE R OY AL SOC IETY OF LONDON ,
encnn'
ru w or THE nou n socm '
rv or znm nvn c n ,
u mr u n : or Tm:n ow“. uzm cu socm '
rv or h um mus .
VOL . II .
EDINBURGH
PR INTED B Y NE ILL 4 CO.
ARCHIBALD C ONSTABLE AND COMPANY, EDINBURGH,AND LONGMAN, nun s'
r, nuns, 0 1 mm BROWN,AND CADELL 8: Bu rns,
LONDON.
18 14 .
CONTENTS.
Ss cr . 8.
Eclipses of the Moon ,
Eclip s es of the Sun ,
Number of Eclipses,
9. Plan ets,
Orbits of the Plane ts,
Rotation of the Planets,
Secondary Planets,
Ring of Saturn ,
Comets,
A berration of L ight, and the Nuta
tion of the Earth‘
s A x is,
Dimen sions of the Solar Svstem,
The A n nual Parallax, and Distance of
the Fixed Stars,
A rrznnrx . On the M ethod of deter
min ing by observation the con
stan t coeffic ients in an assumed
or given Function of a variable
Quantity,
PA RT II. Pn r sxcu . ASTRONOMY .
Szcr . l . Forces w hich retain the Planets in
their Orbits,
2. Forces w hich disturb the Elliptical
Motions of the Planets, 245Disturbance of the Moon
’
s Motion, 247
3. Disturbance in the Motions of the
Primary
CONTENTS. vii
Primary Planets, from their actionon one another , Page 265
Disturbance in the Motion of the Se
tellites of Jupiter from their ac
ouone another,
General result from the theory of
the Planetary Disturbances, 288
5. A ttraction of Spheres and Spheroids, 291
6. Figure of the Earth, 296
7 . Procession of the Equinoxes, 308
Variation of the Diurnal Rotation , 318
Variation of the Obliquity of the
Ecliptic,
8. Explanation of the Phenomena of the
T ides, 326
Principle ofUniversal Gravitation, 339
OUTLINES
6 OUT L INES or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY .
a . The d irection of gravity passes nearly through thecentre of the earth.
5. The Zenith ahd the Nadir are the Poles of the
horizon .
c . If a plane parallel to the plane of the horizon of
any place , pass through the centre of the earth, it.
w ill cut the celestial sphere in a circle hardly di
stinguishable from the former . It is called the
Rational, and the other the Sensible Horizon .
d. The Horizon of any p lace divides the visible from
the invisible Hemisphere. This supposes the eye
to be situated on the surface of the earth : if it is
elevated above the surface , the apparent horizon is
a circle parallel to the former, but low er , being the
base of a cone w hich has the eye of the spectator
for its vertex , and ofWhich - the superficws t ouches
the superficies of the earth all] round.
10 . C ircles, the planes of wh ich pass through
the Zen ith and Nadir of any place , are c alled
Vertical Circ les, and are perpendicular to the ho
rizon of the place .
a . The Meridian’
of any place, is one of the vertical
circles of that place .
6. The vertical circle that is at right angles to the
plane of the meridian, is called the Pr ime Ver ti
cal.
8 our tms s or'
tram “. rn i t osorav.
altitude or e levation at the pole above the horizon
of that plac e.
0
141. The ele vation of the pole at any plac e is
found , by observing one of th e stars, which are so
n ear it as not to se t, w hen it passe s the meridianabove , and again w hen it passes the merid ian un
der the pole that is, by obse rving its greatest an d
its least altitude s above the horizon half the sum
of the two altitudes of the star, is the elevation of
the pole, or the Latitude of the place .
For the star is alw ays at the same distance from
the pole so that on the me ridian it w as as much
above the pole in the one obse rvation, as it w as
b elow in the other.
a . T hose stars never se t at any place of which the
polar distance is equal to the latitude of the
b. This observation requires- the use of sa instrument
whieh can be placed accurate ly ia the plane of themeridian , such as the A stronomical C irc le , the Qua.
dran t, &c . or one likeHa nu v’
s Sextant, wh ichcan
de termiDe the grea test or least altitude of a star
above the horizon , w ithout any previous inquiry
into the position of the meridian.
15. To
a sr nonouz. 9
T5§ Tmfin dfM eridian Line , or that in which
the p lanentm eridian in te rsectsme hotinon of
any place .
O bse rve the alt itude of a star w hen it is on the east
side of the meridian, md mafi dn thc hmizw ,
the point w hich is in the same vertical circle , or
w hich has the same azimuth w ith it. Observe the
star a it has the same altitude again on the
w est side of the meridian , and mark in like manner the point on the horizon w hich is in the same
vertical circle w ith it . The line that bisects the
angle made by lines drawn from the plaee of oh»
serration to the tw i) poin ts thus marked on the
horizon , is the Meridian L ine.
For w hen the altitudes of a star on opposite sides of
the meridian are equal, its azimuths, or the angles
which its verticals make with the meridian, are
1 6 . The meridian and the latitude be ing thus
found , if the merid ian altitude of any star be oh
se rved . its d istance from the pole, or from the
e quator, is de te rmined.
a. For the altitude of the equator, or of the point
where the equator cuts the meridian, is km meingthe same w ith the complement of the latitude gandthe ditl
’
ermce between the meridian altitude of the
star and of the equator is the declination of thestar.
10 our nms s or NATURA L rm hosoen r .
otherw ise on the same .
Thns the places of the stars, as north or south of a
giyea plane, that of the equator, are de termin ed ;hut those pupa , to be fully known, must be de te r
Now; of the circles at right anglea to the equator ,
or the cme les of declinat ion ,.
no one is fixed 1n its
position, but A ll y? them revolve uniformly w ith
the heavens ; so that it is only by the computation
of time that one of them can he d istinguished from
another .
The circle of declination which passes through the
point in the equator which the sun occup ie s ,at the
vernal equinox, has some advan tages ahnye the
rest, as a lin e to w hich the stars are to be referred .
called the Colurc, and its position ,
hisee , for a
instant, may be determin ed by means if a
regulated Accord ing to the follow ing me .
1 7 The iime from a star heing on the meri
d lan ,toits next comrng to the me ridian, is al
w ays of the seine length it is called a Side rial
Day.
12 oun mns or NATURA L rurt osornr .
Observe the hour by the clock wheutbe sun’
s oen tre
tion of the sun at the same instnnt . Let tbe nnye
at which the sun’
s path cuts the equator, or w hat
is called the Obliquity of the Eclip tic,
find an arch e, such that sin — i
c has two values, let the least of them, turned in to
time , When the sun’
s declin ation is north,
the hour w hich the clock should have marked at
the time of the observation is d , if it be before ,and 1211 — 03 if it be after the solstice . Whenthe sun
’
s declination is south, 12 o’
is the hour,
if it be before , and 24 — e’
, if it he after tbe sol
stice . The error thus found may either be corree
ted or allow ed for . The clock is afte rw ards to beregularly compared w ith the soothing of the
stars.
20 . If a meridian c ircle pass through any star,
the arch of the equator in tercepted be tw een that
c ircle and the poin t of the ve rnal equinox,is call
ed the R iglzt Ascension of the star ; and if a clock
be regulated as above desc ribed, the time of a
star’s passage over the merid ian , w hen turn ed in
to degrees, w ill be equal to its right asc en sion .
11 . Suppose
a srs ouomr . 13
a . Suppose the hour accm'ding to sidet ial tithg wlten a
m0
24 111 0 1: 6°
30”
Right Ascen . =
T he pl'
eceditlg ohservatiom , for determining the pla
m of the summ'
e anmpposed mhe made on the
meridian ; and such, when they can be obtained , on
ac count of their simplicity, are prd crable to all
others. It often la ppens, how ever, that the stars
must be observed when they are not on the meri
dian , and their position s, w ith respect to the im
moveable circles of the sphere , must then be deri
T he angle-which the mer idian of a star makes w ith
the meridian of the place of observation , is called
the star’
s Horary Angle, as it is the angle w hich
measures the time betw een the instant of observe s
t ion , and the star’
s passage over the meridian.
2 1 . Of these five quan tities, the Declinat ion,
the A ltitude, the Azimuth , the Horary A ngle
of a star, and the Latitude of the place of obse r
va t ion , if any three be give n , the othe r tw o may
b e found from the re solut ion of the sphe rical tri
angle
1 4 0 0 1 1 1142 3 or NA TURA I. rnrt osormr.
angle PZS, fig. 1. contained by the arches join ingthe pole , the zen ith, and the star.
This general problem contains tw enty cases, of
w hich those that follow are the most useful in
astronomy.
In all of these, w e suppose d to be the declination ,
a the altitude , h the horary angle , 2 the azimuth
of a star ; and l the latitude of the place of obser
vation .
22 . Suppose the altitude and azimuth of a star
to be observed, and the latitude to be also know n ;
it is required to find the dec lination, and the ho
rary angle of the star.
Here a , z, I are given , to find at and h, or, in the sphe
rical triangle PZS, the sides ZP, ZS are given ,
(the complemen ts of l and a) and the angle PZS,
between them to find the side PS, and the angle
P.
By letting fall a perpendicular from S on the meri
dian , w e may obtain a solution by case l st and 2d,
of oblique- angled spherical triangles.
The solution may also be expressed analyticallythus
s sr nouostr . 15
Fin d an angle as, so that
tan 3: cos 2‘ x cot a, then
tan z x sin x
sin a x sin
coa xand sin d
T he latter formula isuseful, when the declination of
a star is to be determined by observationsmade out
of.the meridian .
T he former is useful, when the time is to be found bythe mere observation of a star. It is more usual,
w hen this is inquired afi er, to have the declination
of the star given as in the following problem.
2 3. The declination and the altitude of a star
b e in g given , as also the latitude, to find the hora
ry angle a nd the azimuth .
Here the three sides of the triangle ZPS given, to
find the angles at P and Z.
If d’
complement of Dec.
a’
complement of A lt .
l’
complement of Lat .
16 OUTL INES or NATURAL ra t t osorar.
d' + a’ — l'
By the first fortunla, the hour can always be deter
mined from astronomical observations, if the tim0
of the star’s passing the meridian is known .
The second formula serves to find the meridian, than
the observation of the altitude of a know n star.
The meridian , how ever, is better found by ehser
ving‘
a star when it has the same altitude on the
e ast and w est sides of the meridian , and bisectingthe difference of the azimuths, as in 15.
24 . Let a, h and I be given , to find (I that is,
the altitude, the horary angle , and the latitude , to
find the declination .
0 . Here two sides of the triangle ZPSare given, and
the angle opposite to one of them, to find the third
side . This falls under Case 7. of oblique- angled
spherical triangles.
6. Find
ASTRONOMY. 17
5. Find an are s , such that tan x: cos b x cos I.
cos x x sin p .Next find an arc y, so that cosysin
-
I
then the complement ofDec . y x.
This solution is from its nature ambiguous ; the sum
ofy and somust be taken , when the perpendicular
from the,zenith, on the circle of declination, falls
within the triangle ; their difference, when it falls
w ithout.
25. Le t a, d, 2 be given to find I,or to find the
latitude from obse rving the altitude and azimuthof a star, and know ing also its declination.
Here, again, in the triangle ZPS, two sides are gi.
ven , and the angle opposite to one of them, to find
the third side , the complement of latitude . The
perpendicular must he let fall from the star on
the meridian ; and the distance of this perpendicu
lar, first from the zenith, and then from the pole ,
is found as in the last case ; the sum or difference
is the complemen t of the latitude .
26 . Le ti
a, d and 11, be given to find I that is,
the altitude and herary angle be ing obse rved of a
star, of w hnch the declinat ion is known , to find
the latitude.
VOL . 11 .
[ 8'
OUTL INES OF NA TURAL PHILOSOPHY.
Theperpendicular is to be let fall, as‘ in ,the last case,
from the star on the meridian ; and there beingtwo sides of the spam triangle given, m l the
g‘
le Opposite to one of them, the calculation is
This M M “useful for finding the latitude, when
two equal altitudes of a star are observed , and the
inta val of time between the observations. The
half of the i n terval gives the horary angle, and so
the latitude may be found as above .
27 . In the above formulas it may happen , that
a 2 0 , or that the star is in the horizon, or 90°
from the zenith . The horary angle ts then found,
if the lat itude and dec lination are given , from a
right angled triangle , of,
w hich one of the sides,
ght angle , is the e levat ion of the
the arch be tw een the star, whenrising crea ting, and the meridian ; ans the by
pothenuse is the distance of the star from.
the
I n this case, the hursry angle , (converted into time),is the time of ha lf the stay of the star above the
horizon , (or under it) , and if it be ealled H,
obs H tan ! x ten d .
The other side of the tr iangle , or the azimuth of the
rising or setting star, is also called the Amplitude,
and
a sr aonomr . 21
30 . Suppose that the right ascension ~and dc
c linat ion of a star are given , to find its longitude
a nd latitude . Find an are r , such that
cot x 1: sin 2 x cot Dec .
The dehlination , if north, is reckoned positive , ifsouth, negative, and s has the same sign w ith it .
L et y z x— v, being reckoned positive for thathalf of the ecliptic which is north of the equa
tor, and negative for the opposite , or w hich
chines to the same, pos itive when the right ascen
sion is lgss than a semicircle, negative when it is
greater .
Then tan Long.
cosz-x tan R ight Asa ,
‘
cos x
and tan Lat z sin Long. x tw y .
T his rule , which is Dr Mu s eu m’s, is quite free
tion AB the right ascension , SD the latitude , and
AD the longitude of the star. See V inc e’
s Act .
101. 1 . p . 39. L A Lann a computes the angde BAS,
B 3 and
‘
ss OUTLINES OF NATURAL PHI LOSOPHY.
and the arc AS, in the triangle ABS. Hence the
angle SAD being known , and the side AS, in the
triangle ADS, the sides AD and DS are found .
This is somew hat more prolix . Cannon , 144 8,
(2d edit .) considers the subject differently, butbrings out the same solution w ith Dr Muns
nvnz.
D1:Lsunan has computed tables, for facilitating this
computation, as it occurs very often in astrono
‘
If the star is in the ecliptic , or Lat. = 0 , x
and y 0 ,‘
t herefore cosy l , and
tan R ight A sc .
cosptan Long
The changes are obvious, that would make the same
formulas apply to’
the converse of the problem,
viz. to find the right ascension and declination from
the longitude and latitude being given .
3 1 . By the methods now explained , and chief
ly'by the observations made on the meridian
,os
talogues of the stars have been formed , in w hich
the ir place s are all set dow n in respec t of the c in
cles of the sphe re , viz. the Ec liptic or the Equator,
but most comm’
only the forme r.
a . Htrrs ncn ns began the first catalogue of the fixed
stars, 120 yearsA . C . J esus,”
says Punv, mm
d iam
a sr aonomr . 23
T his catalogue w as iti'
terw ards published by Proseur , w ith some additions, and contained 1022
b. The use of the telescope increased the nmnber ot'
the visible stars, as w ell as the precision w ith which
the ir places were asc ertained. The Britannic Ca
talogue , published by h um an ) in 1669, contain.
e d nearly 3000 fixed stars. Great additions have
been made to this catalogue , particuhrly by LA
C ast e s , who determined the places of nearly10 ,000 in tbe southern bemispbere .
MrWannasron, in 1784 , published a catalogue , in
which the stars are arranged accord ing to their
right ascension and declination .
The difl'
erent volumes of the Connoi'
umwe dc: Tam,
contain a catalogue of more than fixed
La L anna and his nephew observed , in the space of
twelve years, fixed stars, and determined
the ir place s exac tly . Mém. dc (”
Academic des Satan
ccs , Paris 1789. 1790 . See Mos ruc ns, vol. xv.
p. &c .
a Some catalogues, though onot very numerous, are
highly valued for the ir accuracv, such as that of Ls
C amus, contain ing 515 stars : of Hu nt e r , con .
taining 389, Naut . A lmanack, 1773 ; of Mar e n ,
B 4. containing
21 oun m s s or NA TURA L en rrosorn r .
containing 998 ; of M a s c ara s , containing only
36 ; but the places determined w ith sueh exactness,
as to render it extremely valuable . See his Astro
nomical Observations, 1770 .
Bon s’
s Atlas, Berlin , 1797, is the largest catalogue ,
reduced into one body, that bas appeared ; it eon
tains
J. The number of the stars, how ever, visible w ith
the telescope , far exceeds whatever can be reckon
ed . The bright tract in the heavens, called the
M ilkyWay , seems to ow e its w hite appearance to
an incredible multitude of stars, which the eye can
not distinguish. Dr Han scum. has seen
stars pass through the field of his telescope m a
quarter of an hour ; though the field w as not more
than 15’ in diameter .
39 . The most obvious d istinc tion among the
stars, is founded on the ir d ifl'
erent magnitudes.
T hose of the first magn itude , are distinguiihcd by
part icular names ; the re are only ten visible in
Europe , w hich all astronomers have agreed to
belong to that class.
a . The stars visible to the naked eye, are divided, inall, in to six claw es, not very accurately separated
from one another . The an cients counted 15of the
ASTRONOMY. 86
Dr HALLEY, Phil. Tram . N° 364. Also Vine s ,
vol..r. p. 505:
b. If c be the class reckoned from the first, 13 x c“is
nearly the number of stars in that class .
33. The fixed stars are not scattered over the
h eavens indisc riminately , but are disposed in
t'
o'w hich , from
'
the most remote an t iqui
given fromce rtain figure s of
an imals, conce ived to be connec ted w ith them,
w hich are called Constella tions .
a . n the beginning of astronomical sc ience , it was
o
I
nly by such a device as this that men could speak
pf the stars, or describe them to one another . It
is a remain of the ancient picture w riting, that pre
ceded alphabetical language .
b. The number ot’
the ancien t constellations was fi ;
24 M in the
southern hemisphere , and 10 composed out of
groups, not included in the ancient m gemen t.
The stari hf each constellation are distinguished
by the Greek letters , disposed inreferenee to their
magnRude and positionfl
For the method’
of distinguishing the constellations,see L s Lan na , tom. 1 . 8m.
34 . Many of the stars, w hich, to the
'
naked eye , or
fibroug h telescopes of small pow e r, appear single ,
are
26 our t ms s or warm s rnxtosornr .
are found , w ith highe r magnifiers, to consist of
tw o, some time s three or more Stars, ex treme ly
near-
to one anothe r.
a . Dr m asca ra has observe'
d no less t han
thm multiple stam of which on ly 42
before . In some of thsm, the small
very unequal ; the largest a reddish
smallest a sky- blue, inclining to green .
669 .
85. The fixed stars are not entire ly exemptf ram
change several stars w hich are men tioned by the
ancien t astronome rs having now ceased td be vi
sible , and some be ing now visible to the naked
eye , w hich are not in the anc ient catalogues.
M andin lm Vi nca, §704 .
b. A star of the same kind w as seen by K e n na in
1604 ; and several similar facts are recorded .
28 ob i -
t i ne s or NATURA L en i t osornr .
and of:an irregular shape , are discovered ; and on
are resolved into a multitude of small stars, dis
tinct ly separate , but extreme ly near to one ano
a . The fl i'
lkyWay is a space of this kind,visible to
the naked eye , and encompassing the w hole he a .
vens . Dr HEs sc n e n’
s telescope discovers it to con
sist of a vast multitude of stars, 81 .
Other two nab-Le n ear the South Pole , distinguish
able by the naked eye, are called by sailors the
to be eommsed of ytam
b. The other nebuhz are not visible but with telescopes . Hovonns discovered one in Orion
’
s Sword ,
that appeared a bright spot on a dark ground, andseemed like an opening into some brighter
gion .
9. Several more usbs lc had been observed before Dr
He nson“ , by Hu an g , CAssi i i i , LA Cum , &e .
and a catalogue of103 w as published by the French
astronomers, in .
the Connoissance des Ten s for
1783. Dr Hznsc nxi. has given a catalogue of
Trans . 1786, 1789, &c .
asc ns i. has also d iscovered nebulous
single stars, surrounded by a faintluminoes
a sr nortomr . £9
may arise eigfigr
the body in that di
o s»w iry so the appearance of
of the heaven ly bodies, round
the earth, may e ither be produced by the real t e
the rotat ion at the earth, on its axis, from w e st to
40 . It is no objec tion to the supposition , that
of his motion . The motion which any
w ith respec t to those bodies, and all“
fig; one take place just as if the mo
tion common to them all had no existence .
80 our t ms s or . NATURA L r n i i osor n r .
4 1 . The reality of the diurnal revolut
heavens, is liable toa great objection , as
that a circular motion, in the same di
common to an immense number
mm, and entirely de tached from one,
that this motion is so regulated , that
tim e are all pe rformed in the same tim
plane s paralle l to one another .
The revolution of a detached body about a
about an axis, cann ot take place w ithoconstan tly, acting, to draw it out of
line in which it has at er ery instan t a
continue its motipa, The revolution
body, like them on MM mas ses? fromone original impulse ; ‘
its con tinuance remain s no
new action , but is a consequence of theWmatter .
It w as to obviate the difficulty arising
tached and distant situation of the’
bod
one anothe r , that the hypothesis of
orbs w as inven ted . To those w ho do
in the se orbs, the diurnal revolution hf the
can have no probability.
asr aasiom r. 3 1
42. The physical and meehfliical obje etioas to
the rotation of the earth being en tirely obviated,while they press so hard upon the
o
opposite hypo
thesis ; the simplicity of the uplanations afl'
orded
hy the forme ry jm ifin us in admitting it as the
cause of the apparen t diurnal revolution of the
heavens, at least till some fac t , or some princ iple
inconsistent w ith it is discovered.
Sizer . II.
O F“M E ATM OSPUERKZA L REPRACTKOR .
43; A’
new of light, t in passing through t he at
motphere, inh e ri t intoml curve , in t he same ve rt i
eai planeWith the original ray, and concave to
ward the‘
Surface“
of the earth. But the objec t
[mmw hich the ray come s, is m in the direc t ion
which the ray has w hen it ente rs the eye , and
appears elevated above its t rue p lace .
and some t imes
the AstronomicalM a caw .
a . The d irect of the atmospheri c reflection alters the
place of an object only i n a vertical plane ; it ih
“98 888
32 ou'
r tms s or star dus t eni t osor nr .
creases the altitude, but does not affect the azi
muth .
6. Hence all the altitudes, measured as in the prece
ding sections; require corrections to be applied to
them before the true altitudes are obtained .
The method ofmaking these‘
correctiont isnow to be
4 4 . From the princ iples of opt ic s, it is know n ,
that the rays which pass through the strata of the
atmosphe re at right angles, or wh ich come from
stars in the zenith, su'
fi'
e r no refrac tion , and that,
at all other elevat ions, the quan t ity of the refrac
tion is nearly as the tangen t of the zen ith dis
tance .
a . If x be the true distance of a star from the zenith,
and y the M on , so that the apparent distance
is x -
y, then, by the nature of refraction, sin 3:is
to sin (3: y) in a constant ratio, suppose that of
m to n ; and since sin (x— y) sin x . . cosy
sin x . cosy- cos x . siny,
cos t” 0 e
“
sinm ‘v' Novv if y be very
small, cosy I nearly ; and therefore siny
22: tan s . As sin y z y
36 ourmn s s or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
a . Dr BRADLEY has given a formula,
Let 6 : height of the mercury in the
inches, 1: height of Faua znn zrr’
a
s : the zenith distance , r : the m
computed by the rule , the
6 7°
expression for the density or specifi
and In that case, there
49 . Not only are the stars elevated h
tion , but all te rrestrial objects
the same cause , by an angle
the straight line draw n from the eye to
makes w ith the tange nt to the pa th of the ray at
the point w he re it en te rs the eye .
The refraction of the heavenly and t
is difl'
eren tly estimated . That of th
is the angle con tained be tw een the
en
by the atmosphere ,
curve w hen it enters t
ASTRONOMY. 37
tangent at the eye and the chord of the arch inter
cepted betw een the Object and the eye .
Near the earth’s surface; the curvilineal path of the
ray of light may be supposed nearly to comcxde
w ith the circle of equal curvature .
50 . If the e levat ion of the top of a moun tain
from a poin t in the plane below ,and the depre s
s ionof that point from the top of the mountain, be
b oth obse rved at the same time , the angle sub tend
ed at the earth’s cen tre , by the d istanée be tw een
them,added to the obse rved e levation , and the
sum d imin ished by the depression ,is double of
the refrac t ion .
This supposes the path of a ray of light, for a small
part, to coincide w ith a circle . If, in fig. the
arch from B to A be the path of a ray, and if AHand BFbe perpendicular to A C , BC , in A and B
the tangent EA , EB being draw n to the path of the
ray, HAE is the apparen t elevation of B from A ,
and FBE the apparent depression of A from B ;
the true elevation being HA B, and the true de
pression FBA . It is evident, that FBA
BAH AGB, that is, true Elev. true Dep .
Hor . ang. But true Elev. z app . Elev. R efi ;
and trueDep. app . Dep. R ef. therefore 2 Ref.
Hor. ang. app . Elev. app . Dep.
51 . The
88 oue s s or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
51 . The o terrestrial refrac tion found by means
of the preced ing theorem, w hen the elevation is
not very great, varies from i of the angle
subtended by the horizontal distanc e of the Oh
jec ts ; and the radius of curvature of the ray,
the refore , varies from tw ice to tw e lve times the
radius of the earth .
In the mean state (if the atmosphere , the refraction is
about of the horizontal angle , and the radius of
curvature of the ray seven times the radius of the
earth.
The terrestrial refraction must vary w ith the densityof the air , that i s, w ith the barometer and thermo
meter. The great differences, how ever, remarkedin this proposition , must be ow ing to some other
cause .
In the measurement of heights, the angle of elevation
should b e diminished by one - fourteen th of the angle
corresponding to the horizontal distance , Sappo
sing the refraction to be of the mean quanti ty.
52. The effect of refrac tion may also be allow ed
for, by comput ing the corre c tion of curvature , as
in 24 8 . vol. I and taking one - seven th of it,for
the number of feet, by w hich the objec t is ren
de red
as t aonomr . 39
dared by the refrac tion higher than it ought to
be.
“L is the length of the horizontal line in English
2
miles, the correction fpr curvature in feet is
and for refraction
In the measurement Of heights i t must be observed,
that the one of these corrections is Opposed to the
other.
In‘
the next section , the method of estimating the
angle subtended by the horizontal distance w ill be
explained . The subject of terrestrial refraction
require s to be farther investigated by observations
of elevations and depressions made at the same
tith e, and w ith a reference to the states of the
barometer and thermometer.
Secr . III.
FIGURE OF THE EARTH.
53. .Tn e figure of the earth is understood to be
determined by a surface at eve ry point perpend i
C 4 cular
40 OUTLINES or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
cular to the direction Of gravity, or to the direc
t ion of the plumb- line
, 24 . b).
This. surface is the same that the on would havé if it
w ere continued all round the earth ; or, if w e w ere
to trace curve lines, by levelling from a given poin t
round the earth, in every direction , till they
turned in to themselves, the superficies in which all
these lines w ould lie, is that w hich w e consider as
the superficies of the earth. The given point may
be supposed any one, on the level of the sea.
Q .
The figure'
bounded by this superficies, is that w hich
is really measured by‘the combined me thods of
astronomy and practical geometry, and is to be
carefully distinguished from the actual figureof the
earth, including all its inequalities ; or from an ave.
rage figure that should leave out as much of Solidma tter above it, as is included of empty space un .
der it .
541. The length of an arch Of the'
me ridian, tra
c ed on the supe rfic ies above defined, may be mea
sured by Obse rving the latitude of the tw o ex tre
m it ies Of the arc , and then measuring the distance
be tw een the se poin ts in fathoms, toises, or any
othe r know n measure .
The distance, as measured on the surface, divided bythe degrees, and parts of a degree contained in the
difference
AS’
ERONOMN. 4 1
diflgmnce ofwe hmm w giveme kngmof a
Eas t-Osm an“ was the who
A
si a
-
l, this me thod
to the estimation of the s circumference . By
uded the ch cumference Of
. H 1 1 stadia . MON‘
I’
UCLA ,Hislm'
rc
tom. 1 . p. i t? Qde ed it .
the distance Of the arch requhe d, and nmrly north
and south of one another. A series of triangles is
then to he carried poin t to the other
by means of stations taken on the taps of hills or
other elevated
and the bearings of the sidhsrm b of the ma idian d the
given .
or the sides or the .. gles in know nmeasures, or fathoms, is next found by mea .
suring a hue on a level ground, and connecting it
M anglesw ith 4 he sides Of one of the triangla .
In all t we proceed as if the triangles were plane ,whereas they are in fact spherical, and the three
“M
4-4 OUT L INES or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
Let Ann be one half of the meridian , A and B
points in the Equator, C the centre of the earth, D
the Pole , EA a perpendicular to the meridian at
E, a poin t of which the latitude is A : EGA , Hthe centre of curvature , F a perpendicular on the
axis ; then EG is the normal, or H, GF the sub
normal S ; let CF x, and FE z y ; then
x2
) But, by the property of the
subtangents of the ellipses,
s n cos A, and y : n sin A ; therefore , by anbatiq
tution,
a“(b
2sin ’
A2
a2cos A
2
) 64 ,
62
(a2cos A
2sin A
and n
2
Now , by §56. r n ’ therefore,
a"b2
(a2cos A
”sin A
Z
);0
If D be the length of a degree in lat . A, andm the number Of degrees in an
are equal to the radius, then r mD,
58. In,
ASTRONOMY: 45
58. In an ellipse w he re the eccentric ity is
small, or w here a and b d iffe r but by a small
quantity 0, this general formula may be reduced
tomore simplic ity, by extracting the root of the
denominator, and rejec ting the pow e rs of 6 greater than the first we have then
' mD = a (l - i —c
—c
i
a a
t . This value Ofm.
Dmay be changed into another, moreconvenient in calculation , by substituting for sin a?2
l—cos 2 7.
2from which is obtained
6. At the Equator, A 0, and cos 2 A : I ; so that
mD= a (l a — 2 c .
13. At the Pole, x= 90°, 2 A= 180
°§ and since
cos — l , mD = a + c.
The degree of the meridianat the equator, is there
fore to the degree at the pole as a 2 c to
a + c.
d. In the parallel of 2 A=90°, and c0 32 A=O
46 OUT L INES or NATURA L PHIL OSOPHY.
The radius of curvature at the parallel of or
m D, is nearly an arithme tical mean between the
radius of the equator and half the earth’
s axis.
The degree in the parallel of 4-5is also an arithme ti
cal mean betw een any two degrees equally distan t
from it on the north and on the south.
e. The degree in any latitude is understood to be that
ofw hich the middle point is in that latitude .
If, therefore , D be found by actual measurement in
any two known latitudes, w e shall have tw o equa
tions, in w hich a and c are the only unknow n
quantities, and from which, therefore , theymay be
determined .
59. The lengths of tw o degrees, of w hich the
middle poin ts are in given latitude s, be ing know n
it,is required from thence
O
td de termine the diame
ter of the equator, and the axis of the earth, that.
is,the longe r and the shorter axis Of the ellipt ic
me ridian .
a. L et D and D’
be the given degrees, (the least , or thatnearest the equator, being D), A and A
’ ‘
the lati
tude s of their middle points, a the semitransverse
ax is of the meridian , c the difference of the semi .
axis ; w e have the equations,
4 8
c.
OUT L INES OF NA TURA L PHIL OSOPHYo
degree , in any latitude , above the degree at the
equator, w hen divided by the square of the sine of
the latitude , should always give the same quotien t:
or the excess of the degrees of the ‘
meridian above
the degree at t he equator, should be as the squares
of the sine'
s of the latitudes.
Since 0
m—r— v
(D, D)
3 sin (A’
A) x sin (A A)’
D’ D sin (A’
A) x sin (A’
If, then, D'
and D are two contiguous degrees, so
that — D sm (2 A + 10
) x sin
and since sin 1 ° 01746, D’
- D
3 c x . 01745sin (2 A
The contiguous degrees, therefore , differ by a quan
tity proportional to the sine of tw ice the middle
latitude The difference is a maximum, w hen
2 A 1 or when the middle latitude is
450
Asrson omr . A9
The quantity5; is called the C ompressicn , and deter
.
mines the spee ies of the'
ellipsh .
d.We shall now take for the determination of the fi
gure and magnitud e of the earth, the five arches
subjoined , as those that have been measured w ith
the greatest care, and the best in strumen ts ; as
being the largest also, and the most distant from
one another .
fathoms .
I . 0° 56749 60480 2 Peru.
II . 1 1 56755 Ind ia.
III . 46 570 1 1 607594 France .
IV. 52 57074 608256 England .
V . 66 57 192 60952 4 Lapland .
As five quan tities may be combined, two and two, in
ten differen t w ays, ten results may be deduced from
the comparison of these degrees ; and if the merid ian
were truly elliptical, and if there w ere no error in
the observations, all these results w ould coinc ide .
As the latter supposition cann ot be expected to hold,
we must look for some d ifference in the results,
and must choose only those combinations, in which
the degrees are considerably distan t from one ano
ther, because in tha t w ay the errors Of observat ion
will least affect the conclusions . Such are the lat
and 311, l st and 4 th, l st an d 5th ; 2d and 3d , 2d
and 4 th, 2d and 5th ; 3d and 5th.
V00
1“ II. c. The
52 our us s s or NATURA L rm sosornr .
Sw a nse a. Stockholm, 1805.
k. Of all these degrees, it may be said,
of 30 tomes m the length, or 2” in the
the arch, is more than
If the hypothesis of an
them nearer than this
dered as having the su
if it is found that these arches cannot he
w ith the elliptic hypothesis, w ithout
greater errors than those just mentioned
pothesis must be either rejeete d, or
60 . The five degrees in the last artic
in giving ve ry n early the same compress
earth at the poles, and may all be repre
the same equat ion, to an exac tness
the limits that have been assigned (559
a. By combining the degrees in the seven
tioned , it w ill be found, that 2is betw een s ome
and 9 0325.
5. The men be tween these, or £ 032, is that which, on‘
the whole, seems the nearest to the truth . Itmakesthe sum of all the errors in the five degree s amoun t
only to 21 toises, taking them w ith the same sign .
Taking them with their proper signs, they nearly
destroy
ASTRONOMY. 53
destroyone another . The compressionmay therefore
he stated at .0032 and the equation
which doe s most nearly represent the degrees of
the meridian, w ill from'
thence come out
57ol 1t cos2 A
In fathoms,
D 607594 72 cos2 A
In mile s, D 3 299 cos 2 A.
2 .Hence, by the formulas, 59. b.)
Toises. Fathom Miles.
c 1046958 1 1 158 8
q 3271743 00 assesse s 3962 349
1. 3861273 42 34 75700 .
Radius of curvature for the parallel of
0
45° a 3266508 2 1
miles . The miles meant here are English miles.
d . The circumference of the Elliptic Meridian may be
found nearly by multiplying the mean degree, or
that in the parallel of by360 . The result is
miles.
54 ‘ oun ms s os -NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
The circumference:of the Equator is 24806 16“
miles,
a little more than 4-0 miles greater than the prece
din’
gJi
The ‘
ch'
cu'
nfa enoe :of the Meridian may be found
more t ecumtely hy‘the thdomm for the M tifica
tion of the ellipsis . See LA Camus, Lego” E le
mentaz'
rcs dc Math. 5954 . A lso Base Mctn'
t ,
tom. 11 . p. 676.
The Frendhffromtheir late measurement, comparedw ith that in Perl , make the compression 0 0324 ,and the quadrant of the meridian 51311 1 1 toises
w hich gives for the entire c ircumference546848 154fathoms, or 248561 2 miles ; about 1 mile greater
than the result ob tained above ,
e . TheGeographicalMile, or that of w hich there are
60 in the length of the mean degree, is fa
tliliihs,’
53560756 feet.
61 . The scmidiama er belonging to any lat i.
tude A, is nearly equal to a (l n sin2
A), w he re
n denotes or the compression ,’
as before, (g58.
a. This is found, by expressing the“
semidim ter of
the elliptic meridian, in terms of the latitude , in a
manner
56 c ou rs e s or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
that poin t, the centre of curvature of this sec tion ,
at the point where it cuts the meridian , is the
point in which the direc tion of gravity, or of the
plumb- line , intersec ts the axis of the earth.
a . The direction of gravity, if the earth he a solid of
revolution , passes alw ays through the axis of the
earth. If, therefore , w e conceive the plumb- line
to be carried over an indefin itely small arch of the
perpendicular:
to the meridian , either to the east or
w est, its direct ion w ill intersect the axis at the
same point w here it intersected it before , w hich
point, therefore, ‘is the centre of curvature of the
arch, or the same,
w ith K (fig. BK is greater
than EH, nnd~the dpgree ofthe perpendicular arch
is greater,than the degree of the meridian in the
same ratio
The radius of cury ature‘
of the a rch perpendicular
to the meridian, is'therefore the normal of the me .
ridian , relatively to its shorter axis, or it is
a‘l
63. If D be the degree of the meridian, at a
point of which the lat itude is A, and A the degre e
of the curve perpendicular to the meridian at'
the
same poin t,
66 oun m s s or -na‘
rm t PHILOSOPHY.
sw im ,w henare '
given in meson w ithre‘%peé€M isfisnperficfies.
t ] L ll "Mla v lh
'
rhati thefletevhlinations thns aflbrdeflm r be the
l n m lest pouiblw the two planes ought toh e at
m m am a and if t he tmpum..aiais @ne hn ing a m m the planes ahonu pm
case hf the earth, the plane of the Equatortion fixed by the diurnal motion , is
ut as one of t
ton fi determinfl by finding its M-tnde m above
it"cs The other circle to which the ipositidnof places on
the earth s surface is to be referred, must necessa
rily be a Meridian (a) ; but as none of the meri
dians i s d ist inguished from another , by any circum
stance ia the diurnal ,motion , of w hich they all
partake alike , the particular meridian that is to befixed on for the de termination of geographical poo
sitie na, is a matter of arbitrary arrangement.
d,When a meridian is chosen for a first meridian , or
that to w hich all positions are to be referred , it is
net by directly measuring the distance from it that
such a reference is made, bat by measuring the
angle which the plane of the meridian passing
asr aonom‘
r . 6 1
through anygiven place, makes with theaof
the first‘
m n . This angle'
is ‘called a..
gitudc of the place , and the diurnal motion fi r
nhhes us w it h the means of de te rlnining i t. It '
is measnred by the arch p f the equator, inter .
Wham the first meridian and the me
ridian of theuplace, and is reckoned eastm west,
according as the place is east or w est of the first
'The ancients took for the ir first meridian, or that
from which.their. longitude w as counted, th
than of the JFortunate Isles, a line passing, as they
conce ived, through the w estern extremity of the ha
bitable earth. Many of the moderns have employedthe same meridian , or rather that of the Island of
Farm, one of the most westerly of the Canariea. In
general, however, nations employ the meridian of
their own metropolis, or of the ir principal observa
tory ; as w e do that ofGreenw ich, the French that.
It has been proposed to tfi e the
that of' a point very remarkable in the natural history of the globe. It would be inconvenient to take
for a first mer idian any poin t where astronomicalobservations are not constantly made .
65. The hour, as reckoned unde r any two me
”
Tid im s,is d iffe ren t, and the d iffe rence is propor
fina l to the difiemnce of longitude , or the angle
w hich
64 our t m s s or NATURA L rn rt osor n r .
tioned . all the methods of finding the lopgitude may
be reduced .
l
68. If the latitude s of any two places are given ,
and also the ir difl'
e rence ot'
longitude , th’
e ir dis
tance may be found by sphe rical trigonomet ry.
a . It'
the earth is con sidered as a sphere ; then , in the
spherical triangle con tained by the arches joiningthe two places w ith one another, and with the pole ,
tw o sides are given , viz . the distances from the pole ,
or the complements of latitude, and the angle at the
pole , or the d ifferenc e of longitude ; and there
fore the 3d side may be found by the 2d case of
oblique- angled spherical triangles . This side is the
(fistance of the places expressed in degreea, &c. ;
and may be turned into miles, by multiplying bythe mean length of a degree , 60. b.)
If the angles at the base or the azimuths are also re
quired, it w ill be best to resolve the triangle by
Nar i an’
a Formula . See E lm . of Gen “. Edin .
1810, p. 378. See alsoWoonuoosa’
s Trigonome
try , p. 196.
6. But if the spheroidal figure is to be taken - into ac
coun t, the calculation becomes more complex . For
as , on this supposition , the direc tions of the plum
mets AD, BF, (fig at the tw o places, if the ir
latitudes are difi'
erent, do not meet the axis in the
same point, these three lines do not contain a solid
ASTaoNo . 66
angle , and therefore the rules of trigonometry can'
not be directly applied to them . If, how ever, C
be the.
cen tre of the spheroid , and if A C and BC
be joined, the angles PCA , PC B, are deduced from
the latitudes, 6 1 . 6. Then , in the solid angle at
C , are given the two plane angles PUA , PCB, and
the inclination of their planes, viz . the difference
of longitude , or the angle at P ; therefore the angle
ACB may be found by the same case of spherical
triangles as before . He nce the straight line
A B is also found, the radii CA , CB being given,
61 .
5. In this w ay also, are found the angles at the base
of the triangle PAB, or those w hich the plane
A CB makes w ith the planes AOP, BCP. These ;
how ever, are not the true azimuths, w hich are the‘
angles that the plane ADB makes w ith ADP, andthat ABE makes w ith PEB
To find these last if DB be draw n , then in the tri
angle BCD, BC , CD, and the angle BCD are gi
ven , w hence DB is found . Then in the triangle
ADB,all the three sides are given w herefore the
angle ADB may be found . Next, in the triangle
BED,the sides BE, ED, DB are given ; therefore
the angle EDB, and its supplement FDH are
found . Therefore the three plan'
e angles ADP,
ADB, FDH, w hich con tain the solid angle at D,
are given ; w hence the inclination of the planes
may be found , and therefore the angle w hich the
plane PAD makes w ith the plane ADB, that is,
Von. II. E the
66 OUTL INES or NATURA L p n rrosorur .
the angle PAB, such as it w ould be.
measured at
A . In the same w ay the azimuth at B may befound.
d .When these calculations are applied in small tri
angles, they naturally become much more simple .
The process now described , contains a general ao
lation of spheroidal triangles, w hich have one angle
at the pole , w hatever he the oblateness of the sphe
roid, and whatever he the magnitude of the tri
angles.
69. The A rtific ial Globe is a delineation of the
surface of the earth, and the c irc les belonging to
it, on the surface of a sphere , moveable about an
axis ; it se rves to give a correc t notion of the fi
gure and proportion of the parts into wh ich the
earth’s surface is e ither naturally or artific ially
d ivided , as w e ll as to resolve many of the pro
hlems of geography, w hen great accuracy is not
required .
A contrivance of the same kind is applied to the heaven s . The uses of the celestial and terrestrial globes
are“
fully explained in most of the treatises on
A stronomy and Geography.
70 . A Map is a representat ion of the w hole , or
of a part of the earth ’s surface on a plane ; and
though
68 OUTLINES or NATURA L PHI LOSOPHY.
The eye is then supposed placed in the Opposite
pole, and the other hemisphere is in like mannerrepresented . It is in this w ay that the Maps of theWorld are usually constructed .
b. The stereographic projection has these two very
remarkable properties.
1 . All the circles of the sphere , both great and
small, are represented by circles in this pro
jection .
2. A ny twocircles cut oneanother in the projection , at the same angle in which they cut one
another on the surface of the sphere . A c
cordingly, the parallels of latitude 1n this pro
jection cut the meridians at right angles.
These properties contribute much to the simplicityand beauty of the construction , which, how ever,has this disadvantage , that the same drea on the
earth’s surface, is represented by a much larger
area near the equator, and especially tow ards the‘
edges of the projection , than at a greater distance .
Notw ithstanding of this, the stereographic projection is w ell adapted to Map s of theWorld, or oflarge portions of the globe .
72 . The construc tion called FLAMSTEnn ’s Pro
jection , (though it is rather a Developemen t than
a Projection), is very w ell contrived for the rep t e
scutation
A sr aouomr . 69
aentation of smalle r portions of the earth’s sur
face .
a . In this construction , a straight line is draw n for
the meridian of the middle of the map, on w hich
aremarked off equal distances, to denote degrees
of latitude . From a poin t in this lin e , as a centre ,
and w ith a radius that is to the length of the de
gree of latitude as the cotangen t of the middle lati
tude to an arch of 1 degree , an arch of a circle is
de scribed , to represen t the middle parallel of lati
tude . From the same cen tre are described other
arches, through the different points marked off on
the merid ian of the.
middle of the map, w hich re
present the different paralle ls of latitude . Oh any
one of these parallels, equal distances are se t off on
each side of the middle poin t, w hich are to the as
sumed degree of latitude , as the cosine of the lati
tude of that parallel to the radius. The degrees
of longitude are thus marked on each parallel, and
the curves w hich pass through the corresponding
points in the different parallels are meridians.
These are curved more and more on re tiring
from the middle of the map ; but unless the extent
is very great, they afford a very good replt sen ta.
firmof the convex surface .
b. This construction has a very remarkable property,viz. that the quadrilaterals in the map, included be
tw een the meridians and parallels of latitude , have
the same ratio to one another nearly, w ith the qua:
drilaterals which they represent on the surface of
E 3 the
70 OUT L INES or NA TURAL PHILOSOPHY.
the globe . See Mémoire sur la Projection dc:
Cortes Geog raphz'
ques , par M . HENRY, 4 to, Paris,1810, chap . 3m , p . Ste .
73. The construc t ion w h ich is called MERCA
TCR’S Proj ec t 1ou, is chiefly used for nautical
charts. In it the me ridian s are paralle l line s ; the
degree s of longitude are all equal ; the parallels of
lat itude are also paralle l line s and the d egre e s of
latitude increase on the chart in the same rat io that
the degrees of longitude diminish in the sphe re ,
or in the spheroid.
a . The consequence ofmaking the degrees of latitudeincrease in this chart, in the manner descr ibed, is,
that the degrees of latitude and longitude bear to
one another the same ratio that they actually do on .
the surface of the earth ; and as the meridians are
all parallel, the rhumb- lines, or the lines of azi
muth, are straight lines . Hence the great use ofthis construction in navigation . 1
b. This very ingenious contrivance is alluded to,
though obscurely, by P'rou mr . It w as first used
among the moderns by Mna cxroa , whose nam e it
bears ; but the principle of it w as first explained byED .Wa te n 'r in 1599, who shew ed that the parts
into w hich the meridian is divided , must be ia
versely as the cosines, or directly as the secants (if
the latitude ; and he taught how it might be con
structed
a sr aouoMr . 7 1
structed by the addition of the secants of a series
of arches taken in arithmetical progression .
It w as afterw ards observed, that the meridian line
thus divided , w as analogous to a scale of loga
rithmic tangents of the half- complements of the
latitudes ; this w as at first only know n as a fact,
but w as afterw ards demon strated by Ju l e s Gus:
c oRr , in his Exercitationes Geometrica , 1668. Dr
HAL LEv proved the same in a more concise man
ner, Phil. T rans . N 219 , and greatly improved
the construction of the chart.
For other me thods of constructing maps and charts,
see VARENw s, Sect . iv. chap . 32. Encyclopedic
Met/zodique, art . Cartes . L oR cNA , Princip ii dz'
Geog rqfia , 4 to, Verona, 1789. Traité dc Topo.
g raphic, St e . par L . PUt ssAN'
r, L iv. u. LA GRANGE,
Mém. dc Berlin, 1779.
72 oun mns or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
Sscr . V .
or PA RA LLAX ES.
HAvma obtained an accurate notion of the figure
of the earth, w e are enabled to measure the lines
either on its surface or in its interior, w hich must
serve as the bases from w hich, by the rules of tri
gonometry, w e are to deduce the distances of oh!
jects observed in the heavens. Though the fixed
stars are too far off, to have the ir distances thus
ascertained, there may be others, of which the dis
tances admit of be ing compared w ith the diame ter
of the earth. A ll distances that are not ascertainedby the direct application of a measuring line , are
determined on the same general principle ; that
is, from the change in the ir angular position , w hichis made by a know n change in the position of the
observer. This leads us to consider what is called
the Parallax of an Obj ect.
74 . The parallax of any objec t in the heavens,is the diffe rence of its angular position, as it w ould
be
11511 10 110 11 1 . 313
b e seen from the centre of the earth, and as it is
seen from a poin t on the surface .
The parallax of an object, is therefore the same
w ith the angle which the distance betw een the
centre and a given point on the surface subtends
at the object .
Though an object to have no parallax , ought, strict
ly speaking, to be at an infinite distance , yet it w ill
have no sen sible parallax, if its distance‘
19 very
great compared w ith the diameter of the earth . A n
angle of one - fourth of a second may be considered
as insensible ; so that if the radius of the earth
subtend an angle , at the distanceof any object, lessthan one - fourth of a second, that object w ill be seen,from all points of the earth
’
s surface, in the same
position .
Now , an archof 1 is 0 00004848 of the radius ; and
the fourth of a second is therefore
I00000 l212.
825082
and therefore, if a body is distant from the earth
by 825082 of its sem1diameters, i t can have no sen
sible parallax.
Though the centre of the earth i s a point from w hich
no observations can be made , yet as it is equally
related to all the points on the surface, the posi
tions of the heavenly=bodies may bemost conveni
t
OUT LINES OF NATURA L PHILOSOPHY .
ently referred to it . When a star is seen in the
zenith of any place , it is seen in the same position
as if it w ere view ed from the centre .
75. The parallax of a body at a given d istance
from the centre of the earth, is greatest when the
body is seen in the horizon . This is called the
Horizontal Parallax and the parallax at any gi
ven alt itude , or the quan tity by wh ich the true
altitude is dimin ished , is to the horizon tal paral .
lax as the cosine of the altitude to the radius.
If P be the horizontal parallax, p the parallax at the
altitude a, p P it cos a .
If r be the radius of the earth, supposing it spherical,
and a the distance of the body,5: sin P.
When P is very small, P 5, P being expressed,
not in degrees, but in parts of the radius to have it
in degrees, must be multiplied by 111, the num
ber of degrees in an arch equal to the radius .
If the horizontal parallax is known, the distance d
is known ; for d z fi .
70 c ou rs e s or n am e s ] . rn rrosor n r.
he the horizontal parallax,
ang. ASC = s in ZAS, and
ang. BSC = s in Z’BS ; w hence
prmust be supposed negative, if the star is between
the zeniths .
b. If the star does not
.
change its declination, this
formula w ill give the horizontal parallax , though
the observer be not on the same meridian , because
the meridian altitude of such a star, is the same at
all places in the same latitude .
c . If there is a change of declination, and if the oh
servers are not under the same meri dian , then , byrepeated observation s of the zenith distance at any
of the places, the star‘
s change of declination for a
given in terval of time , may be found ; and so, from
the observed altitude at that place , the altitude at
any other place , under the same parallel, may he
found, if the difference of longitude is !know n .
Hence the altitude is known at the place where the
ASTRONGMY. 77
meridian of the second observer intersects the pa
rallel of the first, and thus the parallax is compu
ted as above .
This method of finding the parallax , was applied to
that of the 'moon , by LA CAILLE, who observed at
the Cape of Good Hope , and L A LANDE , who oh- s
served at Berlin, in 1751 . LA L ANDE, Astronomr'
e,
tom. 11 . 1650 .
77. Tw o obse rve rs being supposed, as in the
last article , the parallax of a star may be found,
by comparing it w ith a fixed star, (w hich has no
parallax ), at the time of its passage over the meri~
dian.
For if S be the object of which the parallax 1s to be
found, as before ; T a fixed star, that passes the
meridian at the same time , or nearly at the same
time w ith S ; the angles TAS, TBS, may be both
measured, and they are together equal to the angle
ASB because AT and BT are parallel.
The angle ASB being thus found, the rest of the cal
culation is as above .
La Cums andWARGI NTEN,‘ the former at the Cape,the latter at Stockholm, employed this method for
finding the parallax ofMars. LA LANDE, tom. 11.
6 1052; Vmcn, vol. 1. 158.
ASTRONOMY. 79
Thus changes are called the parallaxes in right
ascension and dec linat ion .
c ln fig . 8 . ifo he the me ridian , P the pole , Z the
zenith, S the true place of the star , depressed by its
parallax toin the direction of the vertical circle
ZSS’; let PS be a circle of declina tion passing
through the true place of the star, and PS'
anotber
such circle , passing through the apparent place .
If8M be draw n pe rpendiclar to PS’
,MS’ is the pa
rallax in declina tion, and the angle SFM, the pap
rallax in right ascension . The triangle SSM may
be con sidered as rect ilineal ; and if w e make theangle at S, or w hat is called the ang le of position,z y ,
the parallax in altitude , or SS'
, being p ,
we have MS’ : p x cosy : parallax in declina .
tion ; also SM Z‘
p x siny ; and hence the angle
COS
M I pmfi — flmwfllfl ifl n gbt ascen
6. 11ence itmay be shew n , that when the horizontal
As the parallax in right ascension is nothing, when
any body is on the merid ian , and increases on
either side , by compmi ng the difference be
tw een the t ime when the body, and a star near
to it , corne to the 1neridlan, wiflt the difi’erenee
hem the time s w hen they come to the same
hour circle, near the horiaony th parallax in rightascension
BU oun w as or NA TURA L ra rLosoq .
ascension may be found ; and thence the horizon)
tal parallax may be concluded. Vue n’a Astra” ;
my , vol . 1 . &c . See also LA Carat s , A ctroa
nomic, 65l . , &c . ; and LA Lanna, Liv. xx . tom. 34
&c . From the difference betw een the al
t itudes of the body and of the star, as they appear
on the meridian , and as they appear near the hori .
zon , the parallax in altitude may be still more di
rectly concluded .
Ss c '
r . V I.
MOT ION OF THE SUN
80 . THE great orb w hich is the source of light
and heat , and in w hose presence all other lum 1ua
rie s disappear, partakes, w ith the stars, in the d iur
nal morion ; but the time betw e en his passing the
meridian one day, and his passing it the n ext, is
greater than a syderial day, and , at a medium, ex
ceeds it by 8 minutes 56 seconds and a half'
nearly.
The sun , therefore, appears to go eastward amongthe fixed stars every day, by an arch correspond.
ing to or by 59’
8 .3. T his is the mean
rate ; the real motion of the sun is sometimes fas
ter, and sometimes slower, than this quantity.
Asraofioura
the meridian one day, and his passing it the next,
is called a mean sotar day.
whe mh r exceeds the fiderial day bym bfi' SSt ot‘
aiderial time ; and
the lengths are in the ratio of l .0027399 to l .
8 1 . The sun doe s not move eastw ard in the
plane of the equator, but in the plane of a circle
cutt ing it oblique ly in the two opposite poin ts, ai
ready re ferred to, of the V e rnal an d Autumn al
Equinoxes, and mak ing, w ith it, an angle of 23"27
’
30"n early.
mm the sun's motion is an in one pliné, may beshew n by observing his right ascension and decli
n ation, every day at noomand marking it od'
upon
a globe , on which a gre'
at circle , representing the
eqaator, has already bea i described ; or , whi ch “
better , by remarkmgflhat the fim of thfi tight wcension has alw ays the same rat io to the tangent
of the declination . This conld not be, tmless the
plane passing through the sun and the vernal equi
nox , made a constan t angle w ith the equator, such
that the radius had to its tant a'
‘
ratio the
Same with the preceditig.
The circle w hich the sun thus appears to describe in
the heayens , is called ' the Ecliptic, and thr engle
which it mahes with the m m , is ealled the abs:
Von. II. F
OUTL INES OF NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
My qf lk flcltplfc. A Year is the time which the
89 . During the apparent d iurnal revolution of‘
the ec lipt ic doe s not re
ma like the equator, so as to,
be alw ays vertical to the same poin t on the earth’s
surface . The plac es, how eve r, ove r w hich it
passes, and through the zeniths of w hich the sun
must pass in his annual course , are all contained
w ithin a zone , extending about 28° 28’on each
side of the equator.
a . This tract, which is called the Torr id Zone, is
88 . Each pole of the ecliptic is d istant from the
eor'
reSpond ing pole of the equator, by an arch
equal to the obliquity of the eclipt ic and in the
diurnal revolut ion , they de scribe the c ircles ’alled
Circla , and thc spaces within them m the Fr1’
g-id
86 oun m as or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
tween the time and the declination, the letter.must
be supposed a maximum, or its fluxion must be
made equal to nothing. Thence the time of the
solstice, and also the declination itself, when a ma
xinmm, may both be found.
86 . The length of the year is de te rmined, by com
paring toge ther the t ime of the sun’s be ing in e ither
equinox , or in e ithe r tmpic , for one year, (found
as above ), w ith the t ime of his be ing in the same
point for anothe r ye ar, d istant from the former by
a conside rable number of years. The in terval
reckoned in days, and parts of a day, d ivided by
the number of years, gives the true length of the
year.
a . It w as soon found , that the year w as nearly equal
to 865days. But when tw o equinoxes, at the dis
tance of 60 years w ere observed , the inte rval w as
found to be nearly 21900 days ; this, d ivided by
60, gives which is nearly the length of the
year .
6. This, how ever, is too great ; and more accurate
observation has found it to be 365d .24-2264 or
365‘15h 48' Btor , Astron. vol. 11 . 40 .
2d edit.
88 OUTLINES or NM RA L e n t t osorur.
G - m ’ “ 8m m” 0 '
sin Dec . C
the R ight A scemitm.
respect of the fixed stars, to rec ede tow ards the
w est, at the rate of nearlyper annals , or about
1° in 72 years.
This motion is called the Procession of the EM
mers, the middle off the constellation A ries was at
the vernal equinox, from which it is now distant
ASTRONOMY . 89
more than 58° towards the east. t ancuoe
discovered the precession of the equinoxes, by e
comparison of his ow n w ith more ancient M ex-
va
tions .
90 . On accoun t of the precession of the equi
noxe s, the tropical year, or the time in which the
sun move s from the ve rnal equinox to the vernal
equinox again ,is le ss than the t ime in which he
move s from one star to the same star again ; the
ve rnal equinox having gone westward so as to
me et the sun .
T he time inwhich the sun goes fi'
om one fixed star
time i hat the sun takes to move overWi of hilorbit. This amounts to 0 14-1 19 of a day, or
so so that the siderial year is sosd 65
9 1 . The Obliquity Of the Ec liptic is also subject
to c hange , and appe ars to have been constantly di
m in ishing from the remotest date of ast ronomical
ob se rvation :its present rate of d iminut ion i s near
ly 50”in a cen tury .
A Chinese Ohservation Of the sun’s altitude at the
solstieu, as encient as the year 1 160 before 0hrist,
has
90 OUTL INES OF NA TURAL PHILOSOPHY.
has been preserved ; and from it LA Pu cs deduc
the obliquity at that time , 23° 54’ Comm it
sauce tics Tests, p. 4-32.
A series of observations, from the age of Pi t -run s,
dow n to the present time , confirms the same gene
rel result. LA Pu c s , ibid . LA Lu ng , Ad m .
2738 Vi nc e , Astra . r. 151 .
The mean obliquity for 1750 , w as determined very
exactly by LA Carm a and BRADLEY, to be 23° 28
'
19”
The obliquity, beside this progressive diminution , is
subject to slight periodic irregularities, w hich are
not here considered . The d iminution itself,
though apparently progressive , w ill be found after
w ards to be really periodical, and a part of a slow
vibration , by w hich the obliquity of the ecliptic
alternately increases and diminishes w ithin very
narrow limits.
a sun’
s diame ter, measured
w ith h is place Observed in the
*t i, that it
“
the sun’s mean appa
m, his least diameter 113— 12, and
“s tanc e at any t ime from th e poin t
n he re his diame ter is least, his apat that time is m— n cos
m 32° 06' 2 and m— n : 31° 32' so that
n z z and or as 5945
97 . Because the distance Of the sun and earth
must be inve rsely as the apparent diameter of the
sun , therefore , if the distance be called y , y
Bwhere B is a constant quantity, to bem n cos
d e termined by Observation . Hence it can be show n,that the orbit Of
'
the sun isan e llipsis, having the
e arth in its focus.
BFrom the equation y
_m - n cos s
it is evident,
that y is greatest, when z= 0, and least when
Iftherefore , FA be taken (fig. equal to
B Band PP
m n’ they w rll represent the
greate st
94‘
OU'
rt rns s or NATURA L rn rt osornr .
he the orbit ot'
the sun ; the eartb being mwomat F, the place of the sumat
'
any time
the angle AFG being z z ; draw GHto AP ; then my
—n).
Now , y z FG, and y cos s H ; themefore
an . FG -
z m . PH+ (m— n) FA . Produce ” to
K, so that n . FK : (m— n) FA ; then m . F0
is . FH- t—a . FK z n . HK . Draw K L perpendi
cular to AK , and GL parallel to A K ; then
or m zzn zzGL zGF. The
lin e GF, then drawn to the given poin t F, has a
given ratio (of a le ss to a greater) to GL , the per
p endiculef di'awn w a line given in positioh ;
m o n o m enim d whas r n a e a .
cun K L the directrix, andZ-ithe ratio of the semi
two positions of the sun, in w hich his d iurnal mo
96 oor t m s s or s n ou t. m n osora r .
99T Thepontien anci ' the spec ies of the sun's or
hit, being thus de termined, the calculation of his
plaee thf any give n time, is teduee d to the geo
metric problem,of d raw ing a line through the fo
cus of an eHipsig soas to cut ofl'
a sector betw e en
it and the t ransverse axis,having a given rat io to
the w hole elliptic area.
IfAGPH (fig. be the m'hit of the sun ; F the fo
cus in w hich the earth is placed ; ant he gle ce of
the mn at a given time ; then the time of- the sun
’s
dm ihihg thfi ereh’
PG, or of the rad‘
ins ve etor de
scribing the seetor PFG, is given ; and the time of
radius vector de
to the w hole e llipsis
given . If, from this, the M ie n d
line FG can be de termined , it is evi
da lt , that the angle PFG, and theW M G ,
are found.
This is known by the name of K epm s Problem , it
can only be resolved by approfimation .
a . The angle PFG, which measures the angular dis
tance of the Wil l iam the Pcrr'
gcc, or low er epsis
is called the true mummy.
6. Ha civcle b e deacrihed fi'om fiie centre F,With a
OUT L INES OF NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
not far from the truth, in elliptical orbits of small
eccentricity. This solution w as first proposed byBunnunnus, a French astronomer, and w as after
w ards adopted and improved by Dr Sar aWa rm ,
and is known in this coun try by‘
the name of
Wann’
sHypothesis . Another solution is distinguish
ed, for the simplicity of the principles, and the e le
mentary nature of the reasoning employed, vit . tha t
given by the late DrMa r n awSr nw s a r , in'
the E din
burgh Physical and L iterary E ssays, vol. 11 . (1755)
p . and again republished in his Physical and
Mathematical Tracts, p. 40 4 . Among the other
lutions, those of Naw'rax, Pris . Math. lib . r.
prop. 30. Schol. of SIMPSON, Essays, 4 to, (1740 )
p. ofEm ma , Commen t. Petrop . tom. v u. and of
Ivoa r , Edinburgh Transactions, vol. v., (the latterextending to the most d ifficult case of the pro
blem, when the eccen tricity is great), are particu
larly commendable.
Of all these , how ever, it may be said, that though
excellent when a numerical calculation only is re
quired, yet when the solution is to be a step in the
investigation of other properties of the elliptic mo
tion , they cease to be ofuse , so that recourse must
be had to such gen eral theorems, as e xpress the
true anomaly in terms of the eccentricity,‘
and of
the mean anomaly. The first solution of this kindw as . given by C LAIRAULT , Theoric de to Lane,
31. lemma 3d , 8m. It w as afterwards tinproved
and extended by other mathematicians, particular
lr
102 ourmmas or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
103. Astronomical tables, constructed from the
data, and on the princ iples new explained , serve
to de termine the sun ’3 place ln the ecliptic , for
any instan t of time , eithe r past or future .
a . From the time of the sun’s passing through the peg
rigee , w hen his true and mean place coincide , his
mean place for any other t ime may be computed ,
by allow ing for the in terval an increase of longi
tude, at the rate of59’ p er dim , and thus the
mean anomaly is computed . From the mean ano
maly, is found the equation of the centre , con
tained in a table , which gives the quan tity of that
equation for every degree ofmean anomaly ; thence
is given the true anomaly, and of course the turd
longitude . The tables are so constructed, as to give
the mean place of the sun for the beginning of every
year , hence the mean place for any time ofany ye ar
i s easily found . When equations are thus ranged In
tables, the quantity by w hich they are found.
out
in the table , and on w hich their magn itude depends,are called the Arguments of the Equations.
The tables of the sun’
s motion , are in reality nothingelse than the expansion of the general M ule
contained in 100 .
Tim, from the fact of the s atiation Of the men’
s ap
parent diameter, compared wi th the reaction of
his angular velocity, w e have demanm d, that ,whether
104 OUTL INES or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
rotation . The decisive facts have not yet occur
red, w hich are to determine, whether a motion of
translation does not also belong to the earth.
In order that the theory of the elliptical motion mayhave its conclusions extended either to the future or
the past, a very accurate measure and reckoning of.time are necessary, and w e are now
of the da ta by which these may w ith certain ty be
determined.
Of the Equation of time, and of the K alendatr,
The arrival of the Sun in the meridian , being a morqconspicuous phenomenon than that of a Star, has
been taken to mark the beginning and end of the
day, used for the purposes of civil life . Solar time,consists of days measured in this manner, and is
used by astronomers, as
‘
well as by the people at'
large . As tronomers begin the day at noon , and
reckon 24 hours round to noon again : in the com
mon reckoning, the day begins at midnight, and la
divided into 24 hours, w hich are counted by 12 and
12. L A PLACE has proposed, that In this the astro
nomers should follow the people, as, by beginningthe day at midnight , the whole of the sun s stayabove the horizon falls m the same day.
1041. The
106 OUT L INES or NAT URA L PHILOSOPHY.
mean and the apparen t t ime , and is called the
Equation (f Time .
a . The conversion of degrees and minutes, into
mean sOlar time , is performed by a different
rule from their conversion into siderial time . For
an hour of mean solar time, there must be reckon
bd'
ls° 9’ 2711847 of the equator ;'
and so on, in the
same proportion .
6. There are four times in the year, when the mean lon
gitude of the sun, and his true right ascension , are
equal to one another , and, at these times, the ap
parent and the mean time coincide . These times
happen , at present , about the 15th of April, the
i5th of June, the l st of September, and the 24 th
of December.
‘
From the first of the above periods
to the second, the apparent time is before the
mean , and the equation of time is subtractive , or
must be taken from the apparent time , to give the
mean . It is greatest at the 15th of May, w hen it
amounts to 3‘ 58"to be subtract ed . From the se
cond to the third interval, the equation is additive,
the mean time beingbefore the apparent ; and it be
comes amaximum about the 25th of July, w hen itamounts to 6’ It becomes negative be tw een
the third and fourth interval, and reaches its ma
ximum on the 2d or 3d of November, when it
amounts to 16’ 15”
subtractive . Dr HALs has
given a geome trical construction, ibr determin ing
the time when the apparent days are longest or
shortest, and also when they are equal'
to the
mean .
a sr aonomi‘.
Suppose, for example, that e ars .
volution of the sun ; then
so th'
at if w e
count three years, each.
of 365days, and a fourth
of 866, w e shall have exac tly four revolutions of
the sun i and at the beginn ing of the fifi b yearnhe
sun w ill be in the mme poin t of the ecliptic which
he was in at the beginning of the first . This is the
arrangement of what is ralled the Juhhn Kalendar ; .
and if the revolution of the stmgwe re exactly 365d
6h, it would be altogether perfect . It is called the
Julian Kalendar, and the Y ear thus computed, the
Julian Year, from Jus tus Cue/m , by w hom, w ith
the advice of the astronomer Sostosuas, in vas in
Tbe addition of a day, or a numba '
of days, to any
fixed period , at stated in tervals, is called Intercala
tion . T he year on which the intercalation fell w as
calledBisscxtslis , because the 6th of the K almds of
March w as tw ice counted. With us, it is called
109. As the true length of the sun ’s revolution
is not w hat has now been supposed, but instead of
is only 36548 4 2264 , the Julian year is
longer than'
the revolution of the sun by
(nearly 1 1m
and , therefore , before a
new year begins, the sun has passed the point in
the
1 10 oun w r s or na ruu t ra 1Losoe n r .
the eclipt ic w here the last year began , by a small
naeuonfl iz. caressx594s'
.
l‘
he Julian reckoning, therefene, falls cuntinunllybehind the sun, and the course of the season s,
hy a quanti ty which, how ever , is so small, that it
was long term it was chsefi 'éd.
m A t the time of the Gound q Ntoa in the yw fi é of
the Christian era, the J uitm talendum in tro
a” dueed into the C lmrch and at mat time the vernal
equinox fell on the QIst om h.
"0 n aeeoun t of
the imperfeefion in the mode ef feel onihgjust no .
titted , the reckoning tiell m mntly hehind the true
time ; so that in the year lm the m year
had fallen nearly 10 days, behind the‘
snn t aud the eqfi nm instead “M on ti“:
2l st, fell on the 1 1th MM ; 80 M the differ
ence w as nearly a day in 182 years. The conti
nuance of this.
erroneous
made the
and it was théi éfoi'e
dar, whichwas dene
the first step w'
as tfi correct the loaf; of the ten
days, by coun t ing the day after the 4thibf
’
October
1582, not the 5th, but the 15th of the month.
1 10 . A s the loss in the Julian kalendar awanuied to one day in 132 yearS, itWould ani bunt
'
to
three 111 996 years, or in the space nearly bf tam
1 12 OUTL INES OF NAT URA L PHILOSOPHY.
tions in the kalendar, and'
tlie real motions of the
sun, should always be the least possible ,°
n not
thereby completely resolved . The modes of in ter
ce lation best suited to that object, require all the
integer numbers to be found which most nearly ex
press the ratio of the fraction 2 4-2264 to 1 . See
EULER , Elemcns d’Alg
-
ebrc, tom. Additions byLa Gasman, 20.
Secular Variations in the apparent Motion of theSun .
The variations in the sun
’s motionWhich have now
been described, are confined wi thin short periods,
during which they alternately increase and dimi
nish. There are others, which go on from one age
to another, and are either continually progressive ,
or circumscribed by periods of very long duration .
These are so slow , that they are'
only perceived bycomparing together observations made at a great
distance of t ime . They are called Secular inequa
1 1 1 . By comparing very distant observations, it
is found that the line of the apsides, or the longe r
axis of the sun ’s orbit , has a progre ssive motion ,
or a motion eastward ; so that the apsis recedes
from
Ast aonour
fromthe vernal equ1nox or by Dr. LAMBRa’s
‘Tables
‘
fi annually.
a. This motion includes the precession of the equi
noctial points, which is in the opposite direction ,
and amounts to so that the real motion of
the apsides eastw ard, in respect of the fixed stars,
is l l".65a- year, or 19'
in a century.
11. Hence there is a difference betw een the Tropical
Y ear, or the time‘
of the sun 3 resolution from equi
nox to equi nox, and w hat 18 called the Anomalie
iic Year , or the time of the sun s revolution frome ither apsis to the same apsis again . A s the apsis
has gone in the same direction w ith the sun over
62” in a year, the sun must come to the placewhere the apsis w as at the beginn ing of the year,
and must move over 62 ”more before the anoma
listie year is completed . The time required to this
is .0 1748 of a day, w hich, added to the tropical
year, gives 36.5d 259744 , or 36.5d 6h 14m 2“for theanomalistic . B lo'
r. Astron . tom. 11 . 91 .
r. The line of the apsides thus con tinually movinground, must at one period have coincided with the
line of the equinoxes . The low er aps18 or perigee
in 1750 , w as 278° .621 1 from the vernal equinox,
according to LA CAILLE and the higher apsis w as
therefore at the distance of The time re
quired to move over this arch, at the rate of 62 '
annually, is about 5722 years, w hich goes back
nearly 4000 before our era,—a period remarkable
Von. II . H for
OUTLINES or n s ruaar. pun osop a r .
b. The secular variation of the equ tion of timefi a
differen t for every different state of that equation
it is greatest about the time w hen the sun is in the
perigee ; and a is then w as
The Sun ’s Rotation on his Axis .
1 14 . The face of the sun ,when view ed w ith a
telescope , though of a bright and in tense light,
ihr above that of any other objed't , is often
marked w ith dark Spots, w hich, when examined
from day to day,“
are found to trave rse the w hole
surfac e fmm e ast to w e st, in the spac e nearly of
fourteea ' days.
11 . These spots, though only visible w ith the telescope ,are sometimes so large, as to subtend an angle
nearly of one minute. Their number, position,and magnitude , are extremely variable . Each of
them is usually surrounded with a Penumbra , be
yond w hich is a borde r of light, more brilliant than
the rest of the sun’
s disk . When a spot is first d is
covered ou the eastern limb, it appears like a fine
line ; its breadth augments, as it approaches the
middle of the disk , from which it diminishes as it
goes over to the w estern limb, w here , at last, it an
tirelydisappears . The same spot,atter fourteen days,
is sometimes discovered again on the east side . It
10
1 1 8 oe t s or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
The Paths of the spots thus trac ed, are
obse rve d to be rectilineal at two opposite season s
of the year, the beginn ing of June and the beginn ing of Decembe r, and to cut the ecliptic nearly
at an angle of 7° Be tw een the first and the
second of the se seasons, the paths of the spots are
convex upward, or to the north, and acquire the ir
greatest curvature about the middle of that pe riod .
In the follow ing six mon ths, the paths of the spots
are convex tow ard the south, and go through the
same series of changes. They appear to be e lliptic arches.
In the beginning ofMarch and September, w hen the
opening of the elliptic paths is at its maximum, the
smaller axis is to the greater as 18 to 100. LA
L anna , Astronomic,3233.
1 17. The preceding appearances may be ex
plained, by supposing the spots to be opaque t o
d ies,attached to the luminous surface of the sun5
the sun having a revolut ion on an ax is inclined at
an angle of 7° 20'
to the axis of the ecliptic .
The apparent revolution of a spot i s performed in 27
days ; but in this time the spot has done more than
complete an entire revolution , having, in addition
to it, gone over an arch equal to that which the sun
has described in the same time in his orbit. This"reduces
120 OUTL INES or NA TURA L rmLosornr .
The length of the Zodiacal Light, taken fiom the
sun upw ards to its vertex , is various, from 45° to
and even 120 °
The season most favourable for observing this phe.
nomenon , is about the beginning of March, after
sunse t : the axis extends toward Aldebaran , and
makes, w ith the horizon, an angle nearly of 64
The aspect of the Zodiacal Light is by not means
uniform ; it is much brighter in some years than
others. A remarkably brilliant appearance of it
w as observed at Paris, l 6th February 1769.
The Zodiacal Light appears to be inclined to the
ecliptic at an angle of and to cut it in the 18th
of Gemini ; so that i t is in the plane of the sun’
s,
equator, or perpendicular to his axis of rotation .
L A LANDE , Astron . 847 .
A s w e do not think that the decisive facts have
yet occurred, which are to determine w hether the. ap
parent motion of the sun is not to he explained by the
real motion of the earth, w e have employed entirely the
language that is suggested by the appearances. The
low er apsis of the elliptic prbit, or that nearest to the
focus in which either the sun or the earth is placed, has
AWRONOMY . 12 1
the Pen‘
gec . supposing that it is the poin t
sun buinotion approaches nearest to the
e con trary supposition , it w ould be
The same applies to ~ the terms
distance of the Sun and Earth, it
that t he distances w e have treat
not compared with any
such as the diame ter of the
The obse rvat ions on w hich such a compa
as this must be founded , and by which the
parallax is ascertained, cannot be explained
understood . In the
that even by help of
it may be infer
less than 10"
of the sun’s solstitial altitudes,
w e saw , how the latitude may be deduced .
In order to make the deduction w ith accuracy, the
sun‘
s altitudes must be corrected for the parallax ;
and it may be easily shewn , that if the horizontal pa
rallax of the sun is so great as the lat. of Green
w ich, for example , determined w ithout makingthe due allow ance for it, w ould be erroneous, by
The latitude de termined by observations of
the stars, is free from this error, and therefore
ought not to agree w ith the former by Now ,
the correction necessary to be made , in order that
the determination deduced from the altitude of the
sun ,
1521 OUTL INES or NATURA L rnxt osornr .
is nearly a straight line , and the disk a semicircle .
The diminution continues, the disk becoming
more and more concave to the w e st, till, about the
e nd of anothe r seven days, it disappears altoge
ther.
After a few,days, the moon again appears, like
a fine c resc ent,to the eastw ard of the sun, w ith its
concavity turned tow ard the east , and continues
to increase on that, side till it become en tirely full
orbed, about 29 days from the time when it w as
last full.
The‘
line separating the light and the dark part of themoon is irregular and serrated, and its form va
ries while one is looking at it through the teles
c0pe : the light, as it advances, touches some
points, w hile they are yet at a distance from the
illuminated surface , and while all round them is
dark . The light on them spreads, till it be un ited
to the rest.
The Moon , w hen full, is opposite to the Sun when
she disappears, or w hen it is New Moon , she is in‘
conjunction w ith the sun : these two aspects of the
moon are called the Syzz'
gies . A t the time when
the moon appears as a semicircle , she is 90° distantfrom the sun on either side : she is then said to bein the quadratures .
“The moon , during all these changes, advances amongthe fixed stars, at the rate of 18° at an ave
rage
126 OUTL t s or Nam “. PHILOSOPHY.
l? & The position of.the uodcs rs found, by ob
se rving the long'itude ot
J the moon ,when the has
no latitude , an d it appears, of
such Obse rvatioris, that the fi not
fixed , but has a slow retrograde motion, at the
rate of in a day ; so as to complete a
volation relatively ro the fixed stars in “m a le
lam . 4 am Pigs . vol. u. p. 351 . an east
A s the momen t of the moon being irr the fi iifiticmay not be actually observed, yet, from eeveral
Observations, taken before and after, the exact
124 . By comparing places Of the moon ,
ved at ve ry remo te pe riods, it i
secular mean motion of the
the fixed stars, is 1336 c ircumfe
w hich give s for the t ime of a
revolution M 3251661 .
In the same w ay, the tropical revolution,
It also has been found, on making these
for very remote ages,
As'raonomir. 129
a s(60 16
’
sin x (12'4 sin 2 3 sin 3Q:
a] be ing put for the mean anomaly, reckoned from
th e perigee .
This is the eqiration of the centre, as deduced fromD]:Lusan ’
s Tables, published in Vi nce’
s Astron.
vol. m . see p. &c.
The maximum of the equation is 3° 17
’and
takes place when the mean anomaly=86°5
’
(Y.
128 . The axis of the lunar orbit is not at rest;
but has a progressive motion , like that of the sun’s
orbit . This motion is 0° 6’
4 1"in a day, or 4 0
°
4 1'
33” in a year ; so that it makes an en tire revo
lution ,relatively to the fixed stars, in 8232
d.5807,
or in a little more than n ine years.
The Trop ical revolution of the perigee is shorter byl ‘1 4 056.
The motions hitherto enumerated, are similar m the
Moon and in the Sun . There are other inequalities peculiar to the moon .
129 . T he moon ’s longitude , calculated accord
ing to the law s of the elliptic motion, doe s notagree exactly w ith her true place , but require s to
be correc ted by an etch proportional to the sine of
VOL . II. I double
132 OUT L INES or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
plains them, but has led us to distinguish manymore, of which the accumulated effect was perce i
ved, by the disagreement of the calculated w ith the
observed places of the moon , though their law s
w ere unknown . These w ill be considered under
the head ofPhysical A stronomy.
Of the Moon’
s Revolution on her Ar id.
132. The moon, as she revolves in her orb it
1about the earth, prese rves alw ays, at least nearly ,
the same face turned tow ard the earth, and the re
fore must revolve on her axis, in the same d irce
t ion , and in the same time , that she revolves in her
orbit.
a . The moon’s surface, when view ed w ith a telescope ,
presents an'
object so strongly characterised, as to
leave no doubt of its being always the same.
The accurate examination of the spots, which the
tracing of the progress of the illumination has na
turally induced, has discovered some apparent ine
qualities ia the moon’
s revolution on her axis, to
which the name of Libration has been given . They
are optical appearances, and argue no real inequalic
ty in the moon’
s rotation.
133. If,
ASTRONOMY. 138
133. If the angular velocity w ith which the
moon revolves on her axis is un iform, that w ith
w h ich she revolves in her orb it, be ing, as w e have
see n , alternately accelerated and retarded, small
segments on the east and w e st sides ought alter
nataly to home in sight and to disappear. This is
conformable to observation .
Thus there is produced in the orb of the moon, an
apparent libration backw ard and forward, called
her L ibration in Long itude .
134 . If the axis on w hich the moon turns,w e re
pe rpendicular to the plane of her orbit, or if her
equator coinc ided w ith that plane , w e should perf
ce ive no other librat ion than that w hich has now
be en de scribed. But in fac t the spots on the
n orth and south of the plane of the moon’s orb it ,
alte rnately a dvance tow ard the middle of the
d isk , and recede from it by a very small quan .
t ity .
This is called the Lz’
bratz’
on in Latitude, and shew s
that the moon’s axis is not exactly, though nearly,
perpendicular to the plane Of her orbit.
135. A third libration arise s from this, that the
point to w h ich the moon presents always the same
face, is the centre of the earth, round w hich the
l 3 spec tator
134 our tms s or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
spec tator desc ribes a c ircle parallel to the equator,in the course of the diurnal revolution Of the
earth.
Hence, when the moon rises, a spectator sees some
Spots tow ard the upper limb of the moon , which hew ould not see at the centre . As the moon becomes
more elevated, these points approach more to the
upper edge, while others, on the inferior limb, come
in sight . This order is reversed as the moon de
scends to the horizon . This is called the Diurnal
or Parallactic L ibrarian.
136. From an attentive obse rvation of the lunar
spots, it has be en found, that the equator of the
moon is inclined to the plane of the ecliptic , at an
angle of 1 ° and that the line in w hich its
plane cuts the plane of the ecliptic , is parallel to
the line of the nodes, or to that in w hich the
moon ’s orbit cuts the same plane .
Bro-
r, tom. 1 1 . p. 4 11 . 72.
a . Suppose three planes to pass through the centre of
the moon , one representing the equator of the
moon , another the plane of her orbit, and let the
third be parallel to the ecliptic . This last w ill lie
betw een the two others, and w ill intersect them in
the same line in which they intersect one another.
136 our tmas or murmur. surrosorn r .
tent from it'
hy more than certain limits, an eclipsealways takes plac e .
139. Hence it is evident , that an ec lipse hap
pens, ih consequence ofi
oue of the two Opaque
bodies, the Earth and the Moon , being so placed
as to prevent the Sun’s light from falling on the
other.
The in terposition of the moon betw een the sun and
the earth, produces an Eclipse of the Sun ; and the
interposition of the earth betw een the moon and
the sun , so that its shadow falls on the moon , or
on any part of the moon , produces an Eclipse of theMoon . The whole of the phenomena of eclipses
admit of explanation , 09 these principles.
140 . As the return of eclipses must depe nd on
the return of the line of the syzygies to the line
of the nodes and as the mean angular motion of
these lines is known , the periods at w hich eclipses
w ould return, w ere there no irregularity in the
motions of the earth and of the moon,may be easi.
ly calculated .
‘
a . T he time of a lunation, or of one revolution of the
line of the syl ygies, is as alre adystated ; and a revolutien of the line of the - odes,
relatively to the sun, is 3461 61968. If, by the
method of continued fractions, w e seek for smaller
numbers,
ASTRONOMY. i 87
numbers, that may nearly express this ratio, w e
shall find 19 and 223 ; so that after 223 lunations,
the node has nearly performed 19 revolutions. In
223 lunations, t herefore , or 18 Julian years 10 daysand 7 hours, the sun , the moon , and the node are
nearly in the same position w ith respec t to one ano
ther ; and the series of eclipses returns nearly in
the same order.
This period is thought to he the sauc e of the Chat
dean astronomers ; and their predictions of eclipses
w ere probably founded on it . It is particularlymentioned by PM NY . A period of 521 Julian
years, is considerably more exact. LA L anna,
Art. 1503.
b. The meanmotions of the lines of the syzygies, and
of the nodes, are also used in another way in the cal
culation of eclipses. Though the mean places of
those lines are different from theWe ; and though
it be on the latter that the phenomena of eclipses
depend, it is useful to have the mean places , in or .
der to know whether the circumstances are such,
that an eclipse can possibly happen or not at a gi.
ven new or full moon . The mean motions in
astronomical tables, afford the means of perform
ing this calculation, which is also much abridged
by a table of w hat are called the Epacts, that is, of
the ages of the moon , (reckon ing from the last
Mean conjunction , and supposing her motion uni
form), at the beginning of every year. L A Lu n e,
4stron. 1732 ; a oosson, Astron.
Eclipses of the Moon.
The length of the earth’s shadow varies,
according to the distance of the sun and earth, be
tw een the limits of and semi
diame ters of the earth ; its mean length being
Half the angle of the cone formed by the shadow of
the earth, = semid. G —parallax G) ; and therefore
if r be the radius of the earth, Sbeing the apps
rent semidiameter, and p the horizontal parallax
of the sub , the length of the shadow reckoned from
r
the earth’
s centresin
142. Hence half the angle subtended at the
earth’s centre , by the se c tion of the shadow at the
distance of the moon , is P S+p.
P is the horizontal parallax of the moon, S and p as
above.
The apparent semidiameter of the shadow , may there.
fore vary from 37'
42”
to
SeeWoonnousn, Astron. p. 340 .
140 OUTLPNES or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
144k. Considering the small arches moved overby the moon, and the section of the shadow,
during the time of an eclipse , as Straight lines
given in posit ion , and de scribed by tw o points,
viz. the centre of the moon’
s disk , and the centre
of the sec tion of the shadow , moving w ith given
veloc ities, the determination of the phenomena of
a lunar eclipse is reduced to the solution of a
geometrical problem.
L et ST and MP, (fig. represent the portions of
the ecliptic, and of the moon’
s orbit traversed, da~
ring the time ofa lunar eclipse , the first by the centre
of the section»of the shadow , and the second by the
centre of the moon , considered as straight lines
L et S be the cen tre of the ear th’
s shadow , andHthe cen tre of the moon at the instant of the appaci.
tion, and let S‘and
'
M'
be any other cotemporary
positions of the se centres ; SS'
and MM’
be ing to
ken in opposite directions. Draw S’
N parallel to
SM ; and join M’N. Now if t be the time in
w hich SS’
and MM’ have been moved over, rec
koned from the moment of the opposition, in hours
and decimals of an hour ; let the horary motion of
the moon in longitude be as, so that M0 =m t,
her horary motion in la titude in, so that Pal/0 : A t ;
and le t the horary motion of the sun or of the she
clow be a, then SS’
: MN n t.
M4 oue e s or h a rve s t. PHILOSOPHY.
ed through the shade the n eare r the moon hap
pens to be to the earth, or the farther she is
from the after of the shadow ; the darkness is
the greater.
The light that, by the refraction of the earth’s atmo:
sphere , is made to enter w ithin the limits of the
conical shadow , is no doubt the cause of this phes
nomenon .
In some instances the moon has disappeared entirely,
as in that mentioned by Karm a in June 1620.
Havas has taken notice Of another, where the
moon could not be seen even w ith a telescope;
though the night was remarkably clear .
146. A s an ec lipse of the mOon happens at the
same instant of absolute time to all Observers, it is
one Of the phenomena, from the Observation Of
w hich the longitudes of places may be most di
rec tly inferred,567.
On account Of the illsdefined boundary of the shadow,
this method Of ascertaining the longitude does not
admit of great precision . It is difficult to deter
mine the beginning or end to less than a minute
of time .
The arrival Of the boundary Of the shadow , at the dif
ferent spots, can be more accurately ascertained
than the'
beginning or end ; and, therefore , as manyobservations
ASTRONOMY. 146
W ef that kind shnuld be made as pon
sible .
When several such observations, made under two
fl uent meridians, are compared , the mean m yfi n ish a tolerably exact determination of the dif
fere nce of longitude .
The comparison of the beginning or end, w ith calcu.
lations previously made, may also serve for findingthe longitude, and may be useful for that purpose
at see .
147. The length of the moon ’s shadow is less
than that of the earth, in the same rat io that the
d iameter of the moon is less than the'
diameter of
the earth that is,in the ratio of l to
a . Hence , when the Earth is in the aphelion , the lengthof the Moon
’
s shadow is and if the moon.
is in the perigee , its distance fromthe earth is ouly so that the shadow may reach the earth,
’
and a total eclipse may take place . But if the moon
w ere in her apogee, when her distance is
Von H. K the
OUTL INES or NATURA L‘
YHILOSOPHY.
the « shadow bould not reach the e arth and the
eclipse could not anyw here be total.
6.When the earth is in the perihelion , the length -of the
moon'
s shadow is and if at the same time
the moon be in the perigee , or indeed nearer
than her mean distance, a total eclipse may hap
pen .
4
c. The moon’
s mean motion about the centre of the
earth 18 33’
in an hour ; and the shadow of the
moon , therefore , traverses the surface of the earth
w hen it falls on the surface perpendicularly, w ith
a velocity of about 380 miles in a minute . Whenthe shadow falls obliquely, its velocity appears
greater in the inverse ratio of the sine of the 0 i
quity.
Relatively to a point On the earth‘
s surface , the sha
dow may go much faster than this, as its motion
may be in an opposite direction to the diurnal ro e
tation .
The duration of a total eclipse, in any given place,
cannot . exceed 7’
58 7. LA Lawns , 1777 .
A n A nnular Eclipse, or one where the sun’
s disk'
appears like a ring all round the moon, may last
12m 245.
To have a partial eclipse of t he sun, it is not requi
site that the shadow should reach the earth ; it is
s ufficient that the d istance of the centres of the
sun and moon be less than the sum of their appa
rent semidiameters.
ASTRONOMY. HQ
moon, aud that neuly in the ratio o( 8 to e ; but
few er eclipsos of the sun are observed in any given
place than of the moon , as a lunar eclipse is vis ible
te a whole hemisphere ; but a solar only to a
151 . The general phenomena of the ec lipse be
i ng calculated to the time of a given meridian, the
phenomena, as they w ill be obse rved at any parti
cular place , may also be dete rmined, by calcula
t ing the altitude s of the sun mid moon, and the
efl'
eets of the ir parallaxes for difl'
erent i naants of
t ime , and then employing theme thod o f in terpolati on , to de te rmine the t ime of the beginn ing and
and, and the quan tity of the greate st obscuration .
a . I.et the plaees of the sun and moon Be found for
an instant, far from the beginning of the eclipse,
and from thence let the ir altitudes for the giv
place be oomputed, as also the efl'
ec ts of parallax in
m a d am e .
Let the m mce of the apparen t longitude of the
two bodies thus found be called 3, and the latitude
of the moon A. If the sun s parallax is included,le t his parallax in latitude be applied to the moon,taking notice , whether it increases or diminishes
the difl'
erence of latitude . Then ACB, fig. 15. be
ing an arch of the ed iptig A the place of the sun, D
of the moon, as just computed , P the pole of the
ecliptic, and FDC a circle of longitude, AC z ),
K 3
150 our t mas or NATURA L r n xt osormr.
and CD z a. and AD the distance of the centres ,
w hich w e may call y=V because the triangle
AGB may be regarded as rectilineal. In practice ,
3 may be found by a construction ; or if great ac
curacy is required, w e may compute y from the
trigonometrical formula , cosy cos 3x cos A.
6. Let similar calculations be made for other tw o
instants, separated by equal in tervals of time a ; so
that one may be near the middle , and another near
the end of the eclipse . L et the distances of the
centres found for these times be A , A'
, A"; let
the differences of these distances be D and D‘;
and let the second difference, or D D’
A .
Then if y be the distance of the centres for any tinne
t, reckoned from the instant for which the first
computation is made, 3
D Q A
The distance of the centres is thus expressed in terms
of the time , and from this equation the time of the
beginning and end of the eclipse , and the quan tity
of greatest obscuration , maybe determined.
c. The time of the greatest obscuration is
m (D sa)
and this being substituted for t, the value ofy w ill
give the nearest approach of the centres.
45-1. oun mr s or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
Occultation d Stars.
152. The same method used in calculat ing
eclipses, may‘
be applied to compute the occul
tation of a fixed star by the moon ; only, when
the moon is distant from the ec liptic, the base of
the right- angled triangle in the former construc
tion , must not be supposed equal to the difi'
eren ce
of longitude , but to that diffe rence multiplied
in to the sine of the zen ith distance , or the cosine
of the latitude .
If S (fig. b e the star, D the moon, D the d ifl'
e
rence of latitude , SE is not to be taken as equal
to AC , the difference of longitude, but as equal to
AC x sin SP dif. long. x cm A
The distance SD being thus found, the reat’
of the
computation is as before .
If at the time of the mean conjunction of the moon
and a star, that is, when the moon’s mean longi
tude is the same w ith the longitude of the star,
their difference of latitude exceed 1 37"there can
be no occultation , but if the difference be less than
there must be an occultation somewhere on
the face of the earth. Betw een these limits there
is a doubt, which can only be removed by the cal
culation of the moon’
s true place . VINCE, vol. 1.591 .
156 oun m s s or NATURA L Pnuosornr .
chm oritur srdens, postal radians,” Hist. Nat.
lib. n . cap. 16.
By Lucifer is understood Venus, when seen in
the morning before sunrise . By Vesper, the
same planet seen in the eyeping after sunset.
c. The other five planets are visible only through the te
lescope, and have been lately discovered ; Uranus llyHs nscn s n, in 1781 Ceres by Plum, in 1311 ;
Pallas hy OLBEa s, in 1802 ; Juno by Han n a,
in 1803 ; Vesta by Quil t s, in 1807.
d. The planets have also particular characters, bywhich they are distinguished ; these, in the order
in which they have been enumerated, are,
s s s t a s i s
It is best to begin w ith the inferior planets, l i d
w ith Venus, as that of which the phen omena are
most easily observed.
154 . Venus the most brilliant of the planets,
always accompanies the sun , never receding fromhim more than and becoming, as she is on
the east or w est side , alternately the Evening or
the Morn ing Star.
a . Venus is the only planet mentioned in the SacredWritings, and in the most ancient poets, such as
Hzstep and Hous n .
b. The
u n m mr . 151
b. ThEEvm ing n d Moming Star, or the Hesperusand Phowhos
'us of the Greeks, w ere at first mppOsad to be difl
'
erent . The discovery that they are
the same is ascribed to Pr 'rns oons s.
155. This M t n an emning star, and at
hum m m fnem the summ at what 18
called her Greatest Elongation, m ean , through
the telescope , to have a semic ircular disk, like the
moon in the last quarter, w ith its convexity tumed to the w est , From that time , during her apptsaeh to the sun , he r splendour increase s for a
while, though the quantity of the illuminttted
“diminishe s, like the moon in the wane ; and.
tt the same time , her diamete r, measured by the
M e of the bonus, increases.
a. A t the time of her greatest elongation, Venus is
stationary w ith respect to the sun , or has the same
motion in longitude . Afi ci that, her motion in
longitude becomes slow er than the sun’
s, and she
comes nearer to the sun , as just remarked. A t a
certain she becomes stationary w ith respect
to the stars, having no motion in longitude .
spect d the fixed M a d is direeted m t
5. Venus at last approaches the sun, so as to be lost
in his fight ; and nlter some tithe, appear-s outh
158 0 111 1 1 112 3 or 11 11 1 0 11 11 1. r n rt osornr .
w est side, and is seen in the morning, before the
c. Though Venus in general is not visible at the time
of her conjunction w ith the sun, she has sometimes
been seen as a dark spot passing over the bodyof
the sun . This is the phenomenon called the Tus
ss’
t q euus. Her diameter is then grentest, sld
measures nearly one minute .
156. A s V enus proceeds to the w estw ard, bet
d isk 13 seen as a cre scent continually increasing,
atflthe same time that the diameter 13 d iminish
ing. At the elongat ion of the d isk is again
a semicircle ; and from thence it inc reases, while
the distance from the sun diminishes,t ill the pla
ne t is lost in the sun ’s rays ; her orb be ing almost
ac ircle
,but its diame ter not more than one - sixth
of what it w as at the former conjunction.
a . The conjunction , which is preceded by the sp
proach to a full orb , or that w hich follows the wes
tern elongation of Venus, is called the sup erior con
junction , as she is then farthest from the earth. The
other the inferior .
b. The time of the greatest elongation of Venus is
about sixty- nine days before or after the inferior
conjunction , when she is betw een 39°and 40
°dis
tant from the sun, and comes to the meridian l b
either before hr after how“
; her disk is then
The diurnal motion in his orbit 4 °5’ 32”
T he periodic time nearly .
1 60 . The pomts m w hich a plan e t has no lat i
tude, are c alled , as in the c ase of the Moon
,the
Nodes of f/16 Planet . The Plane t is then in th e
e cl iptic , and on e - half of its orb it lies on the north,
the other on the south side of that plane .
4 . The line of the nodes of every planet, or the com
mon section of the plane of its orbit, w ith the
plane of the ecliptic, passes through the Sun . This
w as discovered by Ka r e n a . See Dr Sm i t h’
s Ao
count of K r:m e n’
s Discoveries, p . 154 .
b . The node through w hich the planet passes into the
northern signs, is called its Ascending Node ; that
through w hich it passes into the southern , is call
ed the Descending A’ode .
c . T he Heh'
ocentr ic place of a planet , is its place as
it would be seen from the Sun : the Geocenm'
c, as it
is seen from the Earth.
When the Earth is in the line of a pla
n e t’s nodes, or, w hich is the same , w he n the Sun
is seen from the Earth in that line , if the plane t’
elongat ion from the Sun . and its geoc e n tric lat i
tude be observed , the inclinat ion of the orbit ma
b e found ; for, the sin e of the elongation is to th
VOL . II. L radius
162 e a r n in gs or NA TURA L pm t osoe nr.
radius, as the tangent of the geocentric latitude to
the tangent of the inclinat ion .
L A L iana , 1358 . Gnm onv’
s Astron. Book ur.
prop . 20 .
If the planet be 90° distant from the Sun , the lati
tude observed is just equal to the 1nelination . K nr
LER made use of this last method for determiningthe inclination of the orbit ofMars .
162 . If an infe rior planet, at the infe rior and
supe rior conjunc t ions, or a supe rior planet at theOpposit ion and conjunc tion , be also 90
°
distant
from the node ; from the obse rvation of its geo
c en tric place , the inclinat ion‘
of the orbit beingknow n
,the rat io of the plane t
’s d istance from the
Sun,to the Earth
’s d istance from the Sun
, mayb e found .
In the annexed figure, (fig. let S be the Sun,
VV’ the orbit ofVenus, E the Earth ; then joiningEV , EV
’, and draw ing the perpendiculars VD,
V’D’
, if ES a, SV b, and the angle BSV I,
SD z b cos I : SD’; so that ED a— b cos I,
and ED’a 6 cos I . If the angle VES a,
and V'ES a'
, then because VD
164 our t m xs or NATURA L PHILOSOPHY.
therefore be nearly in the centre of the orbit of
Mars. The same is true of Jupiter, Saturn ,&c . o
c . Mars appears w ith his disk perfectly round, both
at the opposition and the conjunction . In the in
termediate positions, he is found to w ant somethingOf perfect rotundity on the side turned farthest
from the Sun .
Observations made at the oppq ition of a planet,
and , w hen possible , near the conjunction , are
valuable , because the planet is then seen from the
Earth in the same place it would be seen in from
the Sun ; that is, the geocentric and heliocentric
places, e ither coincide, or differ exactly by 180
degrees .
164 . The supe rior plane ts are not alw ays pro
gre ssive , or do not alw ays move from w e st to
cast ; but, like the infe rior, they become station
ary, and also re trograde . They are progressive
at the conjunc t ion , and for a conside rame d istanceon each side Of it they are re trograde at the 0 p
posit ion , and at ce rtain poin ts be tw een , are station
af’
y, passing gradually from one of these state s
to anothe r.
a . Thus Mars, when he emerges from the Sun’
s rays,
a few days after the conjunction , and is seen to
166 ourmmts or NATURA L Pa rt o'
sorrtr'
:
For the six principal planets, these ares are
bited in the annexed Table, according to the ir
mean quan tities. See L A L ANDE, 51 192. A lso
BIO L , 97 . vol. 111.
TABLE.
Elongation , Arch of Re Time of Re
when sta trogradafion.
Uranus,
1 65. T he appare nt motion of an Object is affect ed by the motion of the spec tator ; and if there is
not a ce rtain tv that he is at re st , w hen the mot ion
Of the forme r appears ex tremely irregular, it is na
tural to inquire , w hethe r any mot ion that can
Son-ably
168 OUT L INES OF NA T URA L eurt osorl-nr.
This is evident, because CF 18 equal to DB, an!makes the same angle w ith CD.
Hence it is evident, that an object, w ithout beingreally at rest, may he apparen tly so, if the observer
is in motion , and may even acquire an apparent mo
tion , in a direction contrary to its real. Thus al
so the observer and the object both moving w ith
perfect regularity, both describing concentric
c ircles, for example , w ith uniform velocities, and
d irected the same w ay, the one may become sta
t ione ty in respect of the other, and even acquire a
motion in an opposite direction .
167. Suppose (I to be the d istance of a planet
(imagin ing it to desc ribe a c ircle round the sun )from the sun , or the radius of its orb it, and e the
e longation from t he sun,at w hich it appears sta
t ionary, the rad ius of the circle in w hich the Oh
serve r must move , in order to see the plane t sta
t ionary at that e longation , be ing called .z'
,is found
from the equation x“
d .t ' dz cot“c or
ga/1 + 4 cotz
e
a. This follow s from w hat K e rr. has demonstrated in
his Astronomy, Sect. L auoatan , Institutions
ASTRONOMY. 169
Astronomiqucs, p. 585. LA Lanna has slinplified‘
the demonstration , 1188. See also BroT, vol. 111 .
p . Note .
If, by help of the above formula, w e inquire, suppo
sing the Earth to revolve in a year round the Sun ,
and Mars in days, what must be the ratio
of the distance of the Earth to the distance ofMars
from the Sun , in order that the latter may be sta
tionary at the elongation of l36~
‘
w e shall find it
to be tha t of l to which is the ratio deduced
from other phenomena.
c. Not only are the stations thus explained, but the ex
ten t Of the arches of progression and retrograde
tion also.
°
This coincidence affords a strong pre
sumption in favour of the system Of the Earth’
s
motion , or that which, from the name of its dis
coverer, is called the Cop ern ican System.
The same holds of Jupiter, Saturn , Uranus. The
same motion of the Earth, and the same distance
from the Sun , w ill account for the phenomena in
all the cases so that whatever probability there is,
from the phe nomena Of one planet , in favour of the
Earth’
s motion , the same is increased in a quadru
plicate ratio, from considering the phenomena of all
these four superior plane ts.
The tw o inferior planets, give a similar increase of
evidence The four new planets are not takeninto
170 OUTLINxs or NATURA i. rn rt osor n i .
into account, as the times of their stations, ac
may not yet have been sufiiciently determined b yobservation .
j:On the strength of this evidence, w e shall assume th é
motion of the Earth as a fact , and try w hether it is
consistent w ith the other phenomena of the plan e- 3
tary motions.
Orbits of the Planets.
168. If a plane t be obse rved tw ice in the same
node , the node in the interval be ing supposed to
remain fixed,the position Of the line of the nodes
may be dete rmined, and also the distance of the
planet from the sun at the times of observation .
a. L et a superior planet be Observed m its hode
N, (fig. from the Earth at E , and after the
plane t has made an entire revolution , and returned
to the point N, let the Earth be at E'. Then,
from the time , and the construction of the Earth’
s
orbit, EE'
is given , and the angles SEE’
, SE’
E.
But the angles SEN, SE’
N, are know n by obser
fatiou therefore the angles EE'
N, E'
EN, as also
the"
172 cou rs e s or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
or the planet’
s distance from the Sun, is foun d;
The position of PS, relatively to NS, is also th us
determined for, in the right- angled spherical t ri
a
angle, of which the base is the arch that mea
sures the angle OSN, and the perpendicular the
arch which measures the angle PSO, the hypothe
nuse is the measure of the angle PSN, which the
radius vector makes w ith the given line SN.
6. Thus also, EP, the planet’
s distance from the
Earth, is found . If, then , by Observations made
a little before and after the opposition , the diur.
nal motion of the planet in its ow n orbit, relative:
ly to E, be determined , the same may be found re
latively to S, being to the other in the inverse ta
tio of SP to EP.
When many oppositions of a planet are thus oboer
ved, many different radii of the planetary orbits
are determined , as w ell as the angular motions
corresponding to them.
170 . It appears,. On laying down the radn de
te rmined as above , that the orbits of the planets
are e llipses, having the Sun in the ir common fo
cus ; and that the angular motions of a plane t
round the Sun , are inve rse ly as the squares of its
d istances from the Sun ; so that the sec tOrs de
sc ribed by the radius vec tor,are proportional to
the time .
ASTRONOMY. 1 73
These tw o propositions, w hich have already been
shew n to hold of the Earth’
s motion , are therefore
common to the motions of all the planets. Theyw ere discovered by KEPLEn , and w ere first found
out by him, w ith infinite ingenuity and labour,
w hen he was endeavouring to determine the orbit
171 .When the focus of an e llipse , and three
points in its c ircumfe renc e , are given , the e llipse
may be desc ribed and hence the plane tary orbits
may be de te rmined , that is, the axis, the cecen
tricities, and thence the equat ions to the centres,
&c.
The application of this to find the three E lement:
of an orbit , the Eccentricity, the place of the
Aphelion , and the Epoch, or radicalmean place, for
a given time , is in LA L ANDE ,1288, &c . A lso
V in c e’
s Astronomy , vol. 1 . §257 . See also Nzuo
TON"Prin . Math. lib . Imus, prop . 21 . Schol.
172 .When the mean d istances of the planets
are compared , and also the ir period ical times, it is
found that the squares of the pe riodical times are
as the cube s of the d istances.
This great general fact w as also discovered by K er
LER , and is the third of the law s that hear his
name .
173.When
174 OUT L INES or NATURA L rm t osornr .
173.When the elemen ts Of the orb it are foundfrom Observation , at pe riods considerably d istan t
from one another, the line of the apsides Of e ach
of the plan e ts is discove red to have a slow mot ion
forw ard .
L A L anna , 1309, Si c .
The Elements of the Orbits of the different Plan ets
are given in the annexed tables.
Inclination of Secular motionthe Orbit to the
Eclipt ic for
1801 .
Venus
176 our t tn rzs or NA TURAL.
PHILOSOPHY.
Secular var.tude of the Pe
74°21
’
46"128 37 l .
32 17
The First of the above Tables gives the inclination of
the orbits, the position of the line Of the nodes, and
the secular motion of the nodes for all the plan e ts .
The sign minus, prefixed to the motions of the
nodes, sign ifies that they are retrograde . The in
clinations of the orbits of Vesta, C eres and Pallas,
are greater than those of the other planets ; and
the orbit of the last goes far beyond the zodiac.
T he
53 18 1 1249 43 o .
146 39 39121 14 1
1 1 s
89 s 58167 21 42
178 OUTL INES or NATURAL rmt osor nv.
Rotation cf the Planets.
1 76. Four of the plan ets, V enus, Mars, Jupiterand Saturn, w hen examined w ith the telescope ,
appear to revolve on axe s, in the same direction
in w hich thev revolve in the ir orbits ; the axis
of each remaining alw ays parallel, or nearly pa
rallel, to itself.
a . This conclusion is derived from the motion of certain
spots, w hich are distinguished, by the colour or ia
tensity of their light , from the other parts of the
planetary disk: In this w ay the time of rotation
is also determined, as in the case Of the Sun,
b. It is thus found, that Venus revolves in 2311 21m 90,
on an axis which makes a very small_angle w ith
the plane of the ecliptic: This w as first observed
by the elder CASSINI. L A L anna , 334-1 .
c . Mars revolves in 1 day 39 minutes, on an axis incli
ned at an angle Of to the ecliptic .
d . Jupitcr revolves in 9h56m, on an axis nearly perpene
dicular to the ecliptic .
Saturn revolves on his axis in 10h 16m.
180 OUTL INES or NATURA L rurt osornr .
SECT . X .
OF THE SECONDA RY PLANETS.
1 79. JUPITER, w hen view ed through a telescope ,
is ~ found to be accompan ied by four small stars,
ranged nearly in a straight line , paralle l almost to
the plane of the ecliptic and Occasionally on the
same , or on opposite sides of the plane t .
a . Sometimes these small stars pass betw een us and J 11
piter, and their shadow s are then seen traversing his
disk. Hence , it is eviden t, that both Jupiter and
they are opaque bodies, w hich d erive their light
from the Sun .
6. Jupiter, accordingly, projects behind him . a con ical
shadow , in w hich the little stars just mentionedare often immersed ; so that they d isappear, and
are eclipsed , as the Moon is, byTelling in to the
shadow of the Earth.
0 . Hence these little stars are to .be considered as
moons, w hichc irculate round Jupiter and‘
as theyare alway s obseri'ed to move eastw ard, when theyare eclipsed , and w estward when they pass over the
d isk, it is evident, that their motion is progressive ,
182 0 0 1 1 1 8 1 3 or NA TURA L r n rt osorur .
credible labour, a complete theory of the ir motion ;has been established .
The t ime from the middle of one eclipse
Of a satellite , to the middle Of the next , is the
t ime of its synodic revolut ion , and is equal to the
t ime of its revolut ion round Jupite r, increased bythe t ime
i
w hich it takes to de sc ribe an arch of its
orbit , equal to the arch w hich Jupiter has describ ed in the same t ime round the Sun .
a . The synodic revolution of a satellite is subject to va
riation , as the rate of Jupiter’
s motion , in his 0 1‘
bit, is not uniform. The greatest equation of Ju
piter’
s orbit is and the time of the first
satellite’
s moving over an arch equal to this, is
39m 229 ; and so much, therefore , may the synodic
r evolutions of that satellite differ from the‘
mean .
Those of the 4 th may differ 6h from the
same cause . V ixe n, Ast. vol. 1 . 4-19. LA LAnnn,Ast. 2925.
1 82 The synodical revolutions of the same sa
tellite, are subje ct to an inequality, depending on
the distance of the Earth from Jupite r.
a .When the Earth 18 nearest to Jupiter, or at the .timeof Jupiter
’
s opposition to the Sun , if:the synodic
revolution be a , the successive eclipses should happen at the intervals 11, 2 11, 3 n, &c . reckoning from
the
184 our t rnrs or 11 1111 13 11 1. rn 1 t osorar .
bxli s sm to belong to sll the n tellitu. 1t haalso been found , that the eccentrieity of dupiw
‘
s
orbit does afi'
ect the inequxlity in queetion . Mt »
11 .
of the m mmw Mam distances fromJa
piter, which connec ts thc periods of the plm ets.
and their mean d istances from the 81111 ; that is,
the 811mm of the former Quantities are as the
cubes Of the latte r.
Nam e s:M an y“ lib. un prop.
The mean mmion of thc firuun lfitg d ds
ed to tw ice the meanmotion pfto three time s the mean moti
on
L“, are the longitndes of tha e w
tellites, l .’
Celeste , tom. 1. 9 3432,
1 86. The orb its of the satellites are not in the
same plane w ith the orbit of Jupiter .
This appears fi'
om the duration of the eclipses of thesame satellite, when compared with one another .
The
186 OUT L INES or NATURA L rnrt osorn r :
From analog we may conclude, w ith considerable
probabil ity, that the orbits of. all the satellites are
e ither circles or ellipses.
6. Dr Heasc annn has observed, that the same satellite
ismore luminous at one time than another, and that'
the period of these changes is for each satellite the
samew ith the time of its revolution about Jupiter ;
hence he'
has inferred , that the satellite also revolves
on its axis, in the same time that it revolves about
Jwhen
This is also the law of the Moon’s rotation, 132.
190 . The beginning or end of an eclipse of a sa
tellite , marks the same instan t of absolute t ime to
all the inhabitants of the Earth , and w ay the re
fore be employe d for find ing the longitude , in the
same w ay w ith an eclipse of the Moon, S67. and14 6.
a . The immersion of a satellite into the shadow ofJu.
piter, and its emersion fi om it , are Histant'
s more
precisely defined than the beginning or end of a lo.
nar eclipse ; and ther fore the longitude is more
accurately found by the former . The comparison
may e ither be made betw een the observation and
the T ables ; or betw een it and another observation
made under a known meridian .
f
b. The first satellite is the most proper to be observed,
its motions being best known, and its eclipses re
curring most frequently.
A stronomers,
188 cur t ms s or NATURA L rn rt osornr .
the third , and the fourth,
9 39"
192. The plane ts Saturn and Uranus have also
satellite s ; the forme r seven, and Still:latte r'
six ;
w h ich, w ith the Moon , make e ighteen secondary
plane ts in the solar system.
a. The fourth of the'
satellites of Saturn w as the first
discovered ; it w as seen by Hovoans in 1655.
The first, second , third and fifth, w ere.
discovered
by Cassius, be tw een the years 1671 and 1684.
Other two satellites, w hich w e i rnproperly call the
sixth and seventh, though they are nearer to Sa
turn than any of the rest, w ere discovered by Dr
HEe sca su. in 1789.
1 93 . The connec tion betw een the period ic times
and the mean distances of the satellites of Saturn,
is the same as in the satellites of Jupiter, and in
the primary plane ts.
a . The fifth satellite disappears regularly for about one
half of the time of its revolution round Saturn ;and hence Naw '
ron concluded, that its revolution
on its axis is of the same . duration w ith its re
volution round Saturn . Prindp . Mat/1. lib . 111.
prop:17.
1941. The
390 ourm’
rta s or fiATURA l. rmw soru’
v.
observed between the ring and the planet. Sn irn’
s
Op tics . DE LA Laun t , tom. m . §3353.
b. The plane of the ring i s in the plane of the‘
equator
ofSaturn ; it is inclined to the orbit of the planet,nearly at an angle of and remains always pa.
rallel to itself.
1 96.When Saturn is in the longitude of5°
or of 1 1“
the plan e of the ring passes through
the Sun , and the light then falling upon it edge s
Wise, it is no longer visible to us.
é . This disappearance of the ring has been often observed . LA L ANDE , 3354 .
The disappearance of the ring from this cause , lasts
only a few days ; for when Saturn has passed the
node of the ring three or four minutes, or the Sun
has risen above its plane by that quantity, the ringbecbmes visible .
1 97. The ring also disappears, w hen its plane
passes through the Earth ; for its edge , or its
th ickne ss, be ing then direc ted to the eye , and be
ing too fine to be se en,the plane t appears quite
round .
sfIn this case, the Earth requires to be elevated above
the plane of the ring, at least half a degree before
the ring is seen, which makes it continue invisibleseven
198 c tr-
turn s or ua '
ruuu. ra osovn r .
200 . The ring revolves on an axis at right:
angles to its ow n plane nearly, in the same time
w ith the planet itself, or in a little more than ten
This observation w e also w e to Dr B l u e s t “ .
m The fime ot'
the uvalutioa at'
the fing ia AS'
l d n
6. It is ru b ble, that if a satellite at the meaa dis
tance of the middle of the ring, revolved round Sa
turn, and obeyed the law of Karat : in respect ofthe other satellites, it would revolve exactly in10“89“ Bin , Act . Phys. tom. m
’
. p. 96 .
“2 i sm oaomr . 193
SECT . XI.
br con e/rs.
COMET 1s a luminous body, which appears
i n t he heavens only fora limited t ime , seldom'
ex
(reading a few months duri ng w hich, beside the
diurnal motion , of w hich it partakes in common
with the other heavenly bodies, it hasalw ays a
motion pecuhar to itself, by which it change s itsiplaee among the fixe d stars. 1 ts appearance is
usually that of -a collection of vapbnrp in the
centre ofw hich is a nuc leus, for the most part, but
indistinc tly defined .
I n some Comets, the peculiar motion is progressive,in others retrograde . i n the same comet, the
motion is all nearly in one plane ; but in different
C omets, these planesmake all different angles w iththe e cliptic . A t the beginning and end of the ap
pearance of a Comet, it deviates from the plane'
m
which the middle part of its course lies. Naw 'rov
dc Systm ate Mandi , 59 . The Comets have no
parallax , and are therefore certainly beyond the
limits of our atmosphere .
V OL . II. 20 2 . A
196 our t t s or NATURA L run osorfir .
m ay believed , that the solutton does not fallw ithin the limits of an elementary treatise . A t
th‘
e‘
sauie time, a very simple geometrical problemis the foundation of it. fi rt
'
th. The
det ermination of the orbit implies that of the five
quantities, w hich are its elements
1 . The inclination of the orbit . 2. The position of
the line of the nodes. 8 . The longitude of the pe ‘
rihelion . 4 . The perihelion distance from the
Sun . 5. The time whe n the‘
Comet‘
m in the pe
rihelion .
NEW-
run 3 solution being a laborious and indirect ap
proximation , the problem has been attempted bymany others. L A CA ILLE, Astron . 775, Ste.
Boscovrcn , Op era, tom. 1 11 . p . 14 . &c. The solu
tions of Boscok and L A PLACE are illustrated bySir H. ENGLEFIELD, in his Determination of the Ora‘
bits of Comets, Lond . 1793.
L A LANna has given a mechanical construction, that
serves for finding the orbit nearly, it is
follow ed by Vm c a , 653. L AMBERT has demon .
strated some remarkable properties of the orbits ofCome ts, in a w ork en titled Insig niorcs Orb
’
t'
tc'
Co
metaram p rop rietatcs , Aug. Vind . 1761 , 8vo. See
also, LA GRANGE , Mém. dc Berlin , 1783.
The most perfect solution of all is supposed to be that
of LA PLACE, Mcchanique Celeste.
A s'
raonomv. 197
The latest, and in practice one of the best, is
that of DE Luri ng, Abrégé
d’
Astron . Logan 21 .
524.
205. The only Come t w hich is know n with ah
solute certainty to have return ed, is that of 1682,
w h ich, conformably to the predic tion ofDrHA L
Lav, appeared in 1759 .
Dr HA v was led to this prediction by observing,that a Comet had appeared in 1607, and another
in 1531 , and that the elements of their orbits,
w hen calculated from the observations made on
them, agreed nearly w ith those of the Comet of
1682, the period being betw een seventy- five and
seventy- six years.
Though there can he no doubt that these four Co.
mets w ere the same , they w ere considerably unlikein appearance . The Comet of 1531 w as of a
bright gold colour ; that of 1607 dark and livid ;
in 1682 it w as bright ; in 1759 it w as obscure .
PmGaE'
, Cometog raphie, tom. 1 1 . p . 189 .
The return of some of the other Comets is probable,
thgugh not certain .
The great Comet of 1680 , w as supposed by Dr HAL
LEY to have a period of 575 y ears, and to be the
same w hich had appeared a little before the death
of Jan us CE SAR , i n the year 44 A . C . again , in
the reign of JUSTINIAN, in the year 531 P. C . and
N 3 in
198 OUTLNES or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
in 1 106, in the re ign of Hu nt 1 . A t all these
periods, appearances of a great and terrible Co
met are recorded, but no such observations as
can ascertain the identity of the elements . Synop
sis Astronaut!: Cometia s, subjoined to m v’
e
Astronomical Tables .
20 6. The C omet of 1680 , men tioned above , is
remarkable for having approached nearer to the
Sun than any other that is know n . At its pe ri
he lion ,its distance from the Sun w as on ly 757 th
part of the Earth’s. It descended to the Sun w ith
great ve loc ity,and almost pe rpend icularly, and
ascended in the same manner, remaining insight
for four mon ths.
When this Comet was in the perihelion , the diarrhe
ter of the Sun must have subtended an angle of
more than 1 12 degrees. See many interesting
particulars w ith respect to it, tom. 111 .
p rop . 4-1 . at the end.
The phenomena of the tails of Comets, shew the ce
lestial spaces to be void of resistance .
Some Comets have come very near the Earth. The
Comet of 1472, is said by RzorouoNrANus to have
moved over an arch of 120 degrees in one day .
The Comet 1760, moved over an arch of 4 1 de
grees in the same space of time . A s neither of
them could probably have described in its orbit
202 ouruNas or NA TURA L r a osoruv.
If the star is in the pole of the ecliptic, it describes ac ircle, w ith the radius having the pole for
its centre .
If the star is in the ecliptic, it describes a straight
line in that plane, and extending on each
side of the star.
The purposes of practical astronomy require, that
the change made by the aberration on the longi
tude and latitude, and on the right ascension and
declination of a star, should be computed .
212 . If L be the longitude of the sun at anytime , and L
'
the longitude of a star, the abe rra
tion of the star in longitude is
x cos (L’
L)c
and the aberration in latitude is
x sin (L'
L) sin Lat .
These formulas w ere first given by C LAraAvT .
Acad. dc Scien . 1737.
See also CAGN0 L 1, Tr ig . g1529. LA LANDI , 2823.
and D3 L Aua , Ast. lecon . 19 . 20, 21 . &c .
2 13. If A be the right ascension, and D the de
clination ofa star, L be ing the sun
’s longitude , as
be fore,
$04, OUT L INES or NATURAL PHILOSOPHY.
Though it is proved to demonstration , from facts
above enumerated, that the Earth is far from beingthe centre of the planetary motions, yet all the ap
pearances hitherto mention ed, are consistent w ith
w hat is called the Tvcnomc System:of the heavens,
(from its inventor Tvcno in which the
sun, accompanied by the planets, revolves in an or.
hit round the Earth. This system, which its want
of simplicity renders suspected , is entirely over
turned by the fact of the aberration , and the mo
tion of the Earth completely established.
When the aberration w as first discovered, it was
thought that the velocity of light, as inferred from
the eclipsea of the satellites of Jupiter, did not perfectly agree w ith it. It has, how ever, been found,
from more accurate comparisons, that they per
fectly coincide .
2 15. It appears, that the light of the, heave nly
bodies trave rses the space s be tw een them and the
earth w ith the same uniform veloc ity .
The reflected fight fmm the Sflflclh'
tes, travels w ith
them velocity with the 61t 1381“if the fixedstars ; and the velocity of this last in the same fromw hatever distance it comes .
There IS reason to think, that light w accelerated by
of the earth s motion, and proportional to the m
crease
ASTRONOMY. 209
Sr cr . XIII.
D IMENSIONS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM .
Hr'
rnaaro, the distance of the Sun from the Earth
has served as the unit, by which w e have measured
all other distances in the planetary system. It now
remains, (in order to have a precise idea of those
distances), to compare this unit w ith the diameter
Of the Earth, and Of consequence w ith the know nmeasures in which that diameter has already been
expressed . This depends on the parallax of the
Sim; w hich has already been shown to be less than
and, on account of its smallness, difiicult to be
ascertained . The method w hich first presents it
self, does not lead to any thing more precise than
the limit just mentioned .
222. Since the ratios Of the distances Of the pla
nets from the Sun, to the distance Of the Earth
from the Sun , are known , if the parallax Of anyOf the plane ts w e re d iscove red, that Of the Sun
would, Of consequence , become know n .
This follow s, readily, from the law s of the planetarymotions.
V9». 11 .
8 12 our t s or na ruam. rm t osornr .
This construction suppoees the obsm ers O m '
to
be either exactly, or neu'ly in the plnne of the orWfi f i’mw . bn t it may be extended to cnm in
w hich that condition does not take ph ee . l t re
quires , too, that the lmghnde d me flnw d m .
“tion should be accurately known . To avoid
been prd'
erred , for ascertain ing the peullnx. If
w e suppose observers, situated in respect of one
another , so that the line w hich Venus is seen to de,
scribe on the Sun’
s disk, is longer at the oqe ste
tion than the other ; the duration of the transit
w ill evident ly depend-
on the distenoe of the obser
vens fi‘
om one another, estimated in the direction
perpendicular to the lines which Venus traces out
on the surfaeeof the Sun . The dM ences of dtb
ration, therefore , depend on the paralln of the
Sun, or on a functwn of it ; md therefw e whw
that function w know n, the parallax may be mfer
red, fi'
om the comparison of the durations of the
transit . SeeWoona oose , Ast1-on. p .m ate.
The transit of 1769, w as observed atWardhus or
the North Cape , and also at 0 tabcité in the South
Semand was found to be longer at the formcr thanat the latter by QS
’
HlO" The difl
'
a‘
ence , suppo
sing the parallax to bave been S’fiBfl, should hay e
amoun ted to kfl‘w26“95 and bence the parellax isVmon , Art Dr Mn
a u nt’
s
214 our tmr s or aut eu r. Pa t t osormr.
Ss c '
r. XIV
OF THE ANNUA L PA RA LLAX A ND DISTANCE Of
THE FIXED STARS.
226. THE fixed,stars, as has,
been already Shawn;
have no parallax with respect to this Earth, or
any line that can be measured on its surface ; and
their‘
ditmm is so great. that it is yet doubtfill
whether they have any parallax, even w ith re
spect to the orbit of the Earth round the Sun .
A fixed star not only occupies exactly the same place
in the heavens, from whatever point of the Earth’
s
surface it is observed, but it does so w ithin a quan
tity so small as to be hardly measurable , even
when view ed from opposite extremities of a dia
meter of the Earth’
s orbit.
On the supposition that the star does change its situa
tion , when so view ed, the angle whichmeasures that
change is called the Annual Parallax of the Star .
227. If
or r Ll s or NATURA L PHI LOSOPHY.
which w e see in the heavens. A s it cannot he
doubted, that the fixed stars are luminous bodies
like the Sun, it is probable that they are not near
er to one another than the Sun is to the nearest of
tha n . When , therefore , two stars appear like a
shuttle star, or very near to one another, the one
must be placed far behind the other, but nearly in
the same straight line , w hen seen from the Earth.
The same must hold at least in a certain de
gree , w herever a great number of stars are seed
« unw an ted in a small spot. In the starry nebu
la». therefore, such as the MilkyWay, w hich derive their light from the number of small stars, ap
pearing as if in contact w ith one another, it is
plain, that the most distan t of these must be manyWetland times farther off than the nearest, and
light must, of course , require many thousand years
to come from them to theEarth. The poet, per
l-‘
ields of radiance , whose unfading light
“as travelled the profound six lbou nd years,
Nor ye t arr ived in sight of mortal things.
”
e t the fields w hich he describes, are far within
the circle to w hich the observations of the estrone
me r extend
m oun txrs or rum “. ra tw sor a r .
naturally consists of a ser'ies od
’
termg prw eed’
n gaccording to the powm et
'
one of the vuhble
because it inserts a term in the midst d'
a nnw
ber of otherr.
232 . 1f r and y are two variable quant it ietg tf
which several values have been determined from
Observation ; it y be assumed equal to a serios of
the powers of x, beginning from O, and going on
to as many terms as the re are observations, viz.
& c . ; then , if for
y ae , be put the ir corresponding values, a de
termined by observation , as many. equations w ill
arisc as there are unkriown coefi cien ts A, B, C
ant o be found, from which they w ill becom
known.
one of the unknow n quantities, and whefi the ia
tervala betw een the observations are éqaal, u it
supposed in what tbllom :
233. Le t a d,
servations made at tbe times o, m, 9 m, 8m, 4 m,8 m.
82! our tms s or NA TURA L n ut osor nv.
6. If there are three observations, y as
k
Asa - 1
_ 2fl+ 7
c . A ttention must be paid to the signs of the difi'
nr
ences . The succeeding quan tity is here alw ays sub
tracted from the preceding, and therefore if the
former is the greater, the difference w ill be nega
tive . On the subject of interpolation , see New.
TON, as above quoted . on [fi nite Series ;
L A CA ILLB Astron . p, 69 Nautical Almanaclc, ex.
planstion at the end .
Interpolations of this kind, cannot be supposed to ex
tend far beyond the interval within w hich the oh
servations are contained , unless it shall appear, on
continuing the observations, that the formula ap
plies to them, w ithout requiring the addition of
new terms. A s long as the addition of new obser
vations, requires an alteration in the formula, it is
certain that the true law is not discovered .
234 . Le t it now-be supposed, that the form of
the function is known from theory, but that the
constant quantities that enter into it, are to be de
termined by observation ; required, consideringthat every Observation is liable to e rror, in w hat
w ay
g m us e s or unruna r. e a osor nr .
g u m balance one another, so that a more
w fi e gmud formula to he
y : A sin s + B sin 2 x,
and that from observation w e have eight values of
a and y , viz .
Il ence,
64-28 A 9 848 B7071 A B7660 A 984-8 B8191 A 9337 B8660 A 8660 B9063 A 7660 B9897 A 6428 B9660 A 5000 B
By adding the first four into one, secondfour, w e get
A BA B
and also the
and therefore,
x x
or A
In like manner, B : l '.2 ; so that the equation be
comes,
y = (l°
sin x + sia .
Tins is nearly the equation of the centre in the
Earth’
s orbit.
In this w ay all the elements of any of the planetary
orbits may be de termined M ucous!” or cor
rected if they are already nearly kn ow n . In the
con struction ofA stronomical Tables, the number of
equations combin ed has amounted to many hun
In the example above , no method w as to be fol
low ed, but that of dividing the original equations
into tw o parcels or groups, from the sums of w hich
the new equations w ere to be deduced . But when
it happens in the given equations, that the terms
involving the same unknown quan tity, have differen t signs, the best w ay is to order all the equa
tion s so that one of the n uknown quantities, as
A , shall and then
to add them derivative
equations . Let the same be done w ith B, C , &c.
296 c ou rs e s or uam a t PHILOSOPHY.
coefficient ; and the oooflicientn of tbo sgme uqknow n quantity, in the differen t equations, w ill become by that means as pnequal as they can be rea
dered, w hich con tributes to make the divisor byw hich that quan tity is to he found , as large , and it?
self ot'
course, as accurate as the case will admit of,
Suppose, for example, that the formula'
sin x sin 2 x 2 3,
was reduced in to a table, and that by a comparn
son w ith observation , it w as required to correct the
quantities and that is, A and B, ae
cording to our former notation.
Suppose also that the observations w ere made when
the values of x w ere 80° 45°,and tha t the errors in the T ables w ere in
these instances found to be .318, — 334 , - 083,
+ 044 + 05— 021 — 084 ; than , ceiling s« andb the corrections on A and B, w e have
500 a
707 a
8 66 0 .866 6=
3 66 0
0 + .O5
966 a .500 6
866 9 3 66 6
ASTRONOMY.
PART Ii.
PHYSICA L ASTRONOMY.
SECT . I;
br'
rn s roacs s wm ca RETA IN rm:PLANETS IN
THE IR onmrs.
236.IF a body gravitating to a fixed centre,
have a projec tile motion impressed on it, in a line
not passing through the centre , it w ill move in a
curve and the straight line draw n from the M
(ly to the cen tre, w ill describe areas proportional
to the times.
Princip . Math. lib. r. prop. I .
P 9 a. Conversely,
282 our t w s s or NATURAL. rnrt osornr .
nitely small portion of time, or the momentary in“:
crement of AB, o 6 w ill be the velocity at the
end of that time, and 2 A b e D (o
Now if CB = x, B b z i , then , since the
a — xsquare of the velocity is as
xa constant quan
tity 111“may be found ; so that e
2
and therefore 2ABED m“ 11
For the same reason, 2A 61 D ma
a a
And therefore 2EB b e m2
or dividing a by x i , and rejecting the terms in
volving the higher pow ers of i ,
g , and f z gm‘x
The centripetal forcef is therefore inversely as the'
square of the distance .
6. If the point G bisect AC , then , iii—GLCG
if c be the velocity acquired by falling to G,
c’ m“x l , or c z m; us therefore is the veloci
if
” true s t am osrom . 288
ty aoquired by falling fi’
om A half -wsy to the
centre C .
c . Hence also, the force at G : l c"x
£ 39 . If to a tangent of an ellipsis, a perpendi
cular be draw n from either focus, the distance of
4 . M P(6g. be a point in the ellipm ADBE, AB
the transverse , DE the conjugate axis, C the centre ,
Q and F the foci ; GPH a tangent to the ellipsis
in P,89 the perpendicular on it from 8 . Draw
SP, PF, and make FH perpendicular to GP.
Be cause the angles SPG, FPH, are equd , the'
triangle: SPG, FPH are equiangular, and there
SP : PF FH x SG .
But EH x 8G . CD’
, therefore
SP z PF
SG‘ SPCs
PFM dCB
934: M W ? n am d nm w somn .
240 , If a body urged by a centripetal ferc t
must be inverse ly.
as the squai'
e (if the distano
F,
M ym d vmg b tge emmm n A Let P l
bther posifion of the body, aml wi1
radius SP let an afch
ing AB in L ; the frelocity of the'
falling h'
t
L , and of the revolving body at P, w iIl h’
é
If, then , the velocity'
of the revbb tihg body n
mean distance , or at the point D, he called '
its veloclty at e
Now 0 is the velocity of the falling
w ell as of the revolving body
LN be taken equal to FP, the
ing body at L is = Lfi'i
.
equal to SP,hndmic PF,SN Sis
to that the poin t N7is givem The
249 opruruzs or NATURA L ens opa r.
mi'
m
from which the proposition above - follows rea
b. Bymeans of this theorem, themass of theSun, and
of any of the Planets which have satellites, maybe compared w ith the mass of the Earth.
9. In the Mecam'
qtte Celeste, they are calculated from
the most exact data, as below
Quantity ofmatter in the Sun
in Uranus,
d. A s the ratios of the Diameters of the planetsknown from observation
, the ratios of their Bulb ,
being the same w ith those of the cubes oftheir diameters, are also known ; and hence the Densities,which are proportional to the quantities of matter,divided by the bulks, are found.
PHYSICA L A'
STKONOMY.
Dtmity of the Sun ,
of the Earth,
ofJupiter,ofSaturn,
ofDrum,
946. The immoveable point to w hich the plat
ets gravitate , is not the centre (if the Sun , but
1c centre of gravity of the solar system.
From the equality of action and reaction , the gravii
tation of the planets to the Sun must be accompa
nied by the gravitation of the Sun to the planets;so that the quan tity of the n
ibtion of the former,
estimated in any direction , must be equal to that
of all the latter estimated in the Opposite . The
Sun, therefore, moves in an orbit, about the only
point of which the condition beuno‘t be disturbed,by the mutual fiction of the surrounding bodies,
viz. the centi e b’
f gravity of the whole.
if there were only one planet, the Sim and that pla
net would describe similar conicsections, of which
their common centre of gravity would be one of
the foci ; their distances from that point being al
w ays inversely as their masses . If there is a num
ber of planets, the path or the Sun w ill become a
more complicated curve , but w ill be such as to fur
nish a centrifugal force in respect of each planet;
just able to counteract the gravitation toward it .
i on. 11. 47 . Th ,
242 oun w ss or NATURA L enrt osomr .
24 7. The centre of the Sun is never distant byso much as his ow n dhmetér from the centre of
gravity of the system .
The diameter of the Sun is equal nearly to .009 of
the radius of the Earth’
s orbit. Now , if w e sup
pose:the Sun , and all
'
the great planets of the sys
tem, Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus, to be in a
straight line, and the planets all on one side of the
Sun , the centre of the Sun w ill be nearly t he far
thest possible from the centre of gravity of the
w hole ; yet w e shall find'
on computation , that the
distance is not greater than .0085of the radius of
the Earth’
s orbit. w 'ronr Princip . lib . 1 11 .
prop. 12.
24 8. Thus the existence of the princ iple ofgravi
tation, is e stablished by induction from the law s
ofK EPLER, and from it , by reasoning downw ard ,
conclusions have been obtained concern ing the
quant ity of matte r in the plane ts, to which obse r
vation, w ithout the assistance of theory, neve r
could have reached .
It yet remains to be shewn, that the same force which
occasions the descent of heavy bodies on the Earth’
s
surface , at the rate of feet per second, w he n
diminished in the inverse ratio of the square of the
distance,is just sufficien t to retain the Moon in her
orbit .
244 commas or NA TURAL rmLosornr .
St ar . 11.
OF THE FORCESWHICH DISTURB THE ELLIPTICA L
MOT ION OF THE PLANETS.
Wan t there are only two bodies that gravitate to
one another, w ith forces inversely as the squares of
their distances, it appears from the last’
section
that theymove in con ic sections, and describe , about
their common centre ofgravity, equal areas in equal‘
times, that cen tre either nemaining at rest, or mo
ving uniformly in a straight line . But if there are
three bodies, the action of any one on the other
We , changes the nature of their orbits, so that thedetermination of their motions becomes a problem
of the greatest difficulty, distinguished'
by the name
ofm s:Paonu n or w e r an : BODIES:
The solution of this problem, in its utmost generali
ty, is not w ithin the pow er of the mathematical
sciences, as they now exist . Under certain limita
tions, how ever, and such as are quite consistent
w ith the condition of the heavenly bodies, it ad
mits of being resolved . These limitations are ,
that the force which one of the bodies exerts on the
other two, is, either from the smallness of that ho
dy,’
or its great distance, very inconsiderable, ia*
respect
our LrNs s or Na'
rosu. gart osoenr.
tion of the line passing through the centres of theSun and Earth.
This force at the conjunction, exceeding that part atthe disturbing force which draws tha
'
Moon to the
Earth, tends to diminish the Moonls gravity to the
Earth. A t the oppositionB it does the same, bybecoming negatiye ; for the Earth is
.
then drawnmore than the Moon, and the difl
'
erence is nearlythe same as at the conjunotion.
b. IfMN be taken equal toHE , and NO made per-
7
pendicular to the radius vector, the force MN is
resolved into two, one directed fromM to 0 ,les
sening the gravity of the Moon to the Earth, and
the otherdirected from 0 toN, parallel to the tan
gent to the q n“s
‘orbit at M, and therefore acce
lerating theMoonfrom O to A , retarding her fromA to D, sod so alternately in the other two qua
drants .
A t the quadratures C andD, the forceHK van ishes,
and the only remaining force is directed to the
centre ofthe Earth, so that the areas are there pro
portional to the times.
f’ The analytical values of these foroes are next to befound. Draw CED the line of the quadratures,
put SE'
a, EM the radius vector of the Moon’
s
orbit r, the angle CEM x, and themass of the
Sun as. The force that retains the Earth in its
our tmzs or s n ou t. rmtosormr.
The mean quantity of the
‘
force (1 3 sin
6, when it boun cer;- 3 i sin1 a), the fluent
gx + gsin x x cos xy;
and this, when x is an entire circumference, be.
and it gives $227
for the mean disturbing force
acting on the Moon, m the direction of the radius
vector.
250 . Hence , at the quadratures, the gravity of
the Moon to the Earth is increased,
by aquant ityequal to the mass of the Sun mult iplied inito the
radius of the Moon’s orbit, and divided by the
w ho of the Sun ’s distance from the Eatth
'
p at the
opposition and conjunction it is dimin ished by
twice this quantity ; and the effect upon the
w hole
our t m s s os -m ruaar. enrt osor nv.
,orbit in less time. As the area described by the
radius vector in the primitive and the disturbed on
bit is the same , it can be shewn, that in conse
quence (if t he mean disturbing force,vector is increased by a 858th part, and the angular vdocity diminished by a 179th part .
E xposition win Systems duNeeds, chap. v. p. 213.
9“edit.
952. The annual equation is an irregularity in
the Moon’s motion , arising from the variation of
the Sun’s distance from the Earth, and bearing a
given ratio to the equation of the Sun ’s cen tre .
Since the Sun’s disturbing force is inversely as the
cube of his distance, when he approaches the
Earth at the perihelion , theMoon’
smotion is slow er ,
and, for the same reason , at the aphelion , it is
quicker than the mean . This produces w hat is
called the annual equation, equal nearly to (l
x sin Sun’
s mean anomaly.
This has a contrary sign to the equation of the Sun’s
253. An inequality in the same disturbing force
depending on the position of the transverse axis of
the Moon ’s orbit, in respect of the line drawn
from the Earth to the Sun, produces the equa
tion
254 our tw s s or s a t-
vas t rnuosoi a'
i '.
254 . The Variation is an equation derived fromthe force at right angles to the radius Vector,which, from the quadratures to the syzygies, s e
calcretes the motion of the Moon, and from the‘
(
syzygies to thq quadratures re tards it. This force
w as found to be proportional to the sine of tw ice‘
the Moon’s angular distance from the Sun , and
the equation itself is nearly prOportional to the
same quantity.
If the angular distance of the Moon frbm the Sm!
A, the variation , according to Mar i a, is
sin 2 A
(20) sin 3
‘
A
sin 4 A
Beside the above inequalities, first found out by OHservation, and now explained by the theory of gra
vity, there are several others of smaller amoun t ,which theory alone has discovered ; all that oh
servation could do, being to ascertain that some
unknown inequalities existed, which introduced
an uncertainty into all the calculations of the
Moon’
s plac e . These have been separated by the
theory, and the Tables, by that means, brought to
agree very nearly with observation.
955. One of the equations w hich theory has discovered, is remarkable for the great length of its
pe riod,
256 onrunns or NATURAL rriiLosor'
flY.
of the transverse axis of the orbit, hr of the line of
the apsides.
957. The motion of the line of the nodes is pro
duced by that part of the Sun’s disturbing forcewhich is in the direction of the straight line
joining the centres of the Sun and Earth, and
proportional to the distance of the Moon from a
plane passing through the centre of the Earth atright angles to the line joining the c entres of the
Sun and Earth.
Suppose the Moon to be on the same side of the lastmentioned plane that the Sun is. Then , if in the
direction of her motion for the instant ju'
st past,
there be taken a line equal to the space passed over
in that instant, and if in the line drawn through
the Moon, perpendicular to the above plane , on
the side opposite to the plane , there be taken a
part equal to the space which the force urging the
Moon from the plane would have made her de
scribe ih the same time, then the trtre path of
the Moon w ill be the diagonal of the parallelogram
under these two lines ; and the momentarychange in the place of the no
'
de will be the distance
between the point where an arch having the dirce
tion of this diagonal, and another ha'
ving the dirce
tion of its side , meet the plane of the ecliptic . The
same w ill happen in other situations of the Moon ,
and the line of the nodes w ill thus have a motion
in
258 our t w s s or NA TURAL rm nosorn r .
260:From the same cause arises a variat ion it !
the inclination of the Moon’s orbit to the ec lipt ic
confined w ithin ve ry narrow limits. A con strue
t ion for de te rmin ing the inc lination for any givef l
t ime , is given ibid. prop . and is found to agree
w ith obse rvation .
What respects the motion of the nodes is thus com
pletely explained ; and it is here that the indirec t
method of de termining the Moon’s inequalities has
been most successful . It has not been equallyosc ’
in ascertaining the motion of the apside s.
To conceive , in general, the cause w hich renders the‘
apsides of the Moon’
s orbit more than 180 degrees
distant from one another, w e must begin w ith sup
posing the Moon at the low er apsis ; then , if that
planet w ere acted on only by the force of gravity,
the radius vector, after it had described
w ould arrive at the upp er apsis, or w ould be inter
sooted by the orbit at right angles.
But as the mean disturbing force , in the direction of
the radius vector, may be considered as a quanti
ty constantly taken from the Moon’
s gravity, the
portion of her path de scribed in any instant, w ill
fall be tw een the tangent and the arch of the ellipt ic orbit w hich w ould have been described if the
Moon had been acted on by gravity alone . The
actual path of the Moon , therefore , w ill be less
bent than the elliptic orbit would have been in the
same
260 ovum ” or NATURAL rnxt osorn r .
elegance. Dr Suwn r has demonstrated this
26 1. If r be the radius of the Moon’s orbit
,
supposing it to be a circle , and ac ted on on ly by F,
her gravity to the Earth . Then if a mean disturb
ing force a:f be supposed to diminish the Moon’s
gravity, the greatest distance she w ill gO to from
and the cube of this
distance w ill be to the cube of r in the duplicate
ratio of the angle desc ribed by the Moon from
one apsis to the n ext to two right angles.
Tracts Hath. dfr Phys . Tract w . prop. 27 ; also
Hence the angle described from one apsis to the
x(F— 5f)
Farsi has adOptcd the principle of MAcnm, includingalso the action of the forces perpendicular to the
radius vector . Op era, tom. m . p . 380.
Vmcn, in the 2d volume of his Astronomy , has com .
pated the motion of the apsides according to this»
lost method, and makes the quantity of it in a sy.
PHYSICA L ASTRONOMY. 261
derisl revolution of the and
M us e’s Tables make the latter Dr
Su wul 'r’
s Th erm gives W8 4
§d§ ’ the value sssigned to it, §250.
The result of these inve stigations, therefore, agrees
nearly with observation ; but it cannot be denied
that the principle on which they are fmmded is li .
able to some object ions, so that if it wm not for
the information derived from the direct solution
of the problem of the three bodies, it might still be
doubted, w hether the principle of gravity account
ed exactly for the motion of the Moon’s spsides.
CM l RAU’
l‘
, who first compared the result of that
solution w ith observation, met w ith the same didi
culty that Nsw roa trad done , and found that his for .
mula gave only half the true motion . He therefore M agined that gravity is not inversely as the
squares of the distances, but follow s a more compli.
cated law ,such as can only be expressed by g for
mula of two terms . In seeking for the eoefi cien t
262 OUTL INES or NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
position , that the force of gravity is inversely as the
square Of the distance .
262 . Since , by the Moon’s inequalities, the ra
tio of the Sun is d isturb ing force tothe force w ith
w hich the Moon gravitate s to the Earth become s
know n ; if the rat io of the forme r, to the w hole
force re taining the Earth in its orb it, could be
fouhd, the ratio of this last to the force Of the
Earth on the Moon w ould also be found , and from
thenc e the rat io of the d istance of the Moon to
the d istance of the Sun from the Earth.
The latter ratio w ould be given, because ifE andfare the forces that retain the Earth and the Moon
in their orbits if a and r are the radii of those or
bits, P and p the periodic times,
a r0F F
P‘P‘
and so if the ratio of F to F’ be given , P andp bemg also given, the ratio Of a to r is found .
In this w ay the Sun’
s distance might be found fromhis ow n f orce to disturb the Moon , the idea of
Which appears first to have Occurred to Dr MA
THEWST EWART . The principal difficulty is to
‘fitld‘
the ratio of the disturbing force of the“
Sun to the force w hich the Sun exerts on the
Earth. If the expression of that force was carried
u n me t. “n arrows . 266
Ssc'r. III.
usruansuc e s 1N THE MOT IONS or THE PRIMA
ar PLANET: PRODUCED BY rnm a ACT ION ON
ONE s s or n aa.
Ir is necessary, in this inquiry, to know-
the quanti.
ties of matter in the different planets ; and these
have been she edy calculated for the planets which
have satellites. The masses of Venus and Mars
have been computed by M . LA Pu cn from some
disturbances which they appear to produce on the
Earth’
s motion . The mass of Mercury has been
estimated, from supposing his density, and that of
the Earth, to be inversely as their mean distances
from the Sun. This law holds w ith respect to
the Earth, Jupiter and Saturn , and analogy autho
rises the extension of it to Mercury. From know
ing the density and the bulk, the quantity of mat
ter is inferred. The mass of the Sun being 1 ,
that of Mercury is M of Venus
of Mars those of the others being as
266 . ourms rs or NATURAL r a t t osor nv.
The gravitation of one plane t to another, is expres.
sed by the quantity of matter in each, divided by
the square of the distance ; and therefore the tw o
bodies tend to come together w ith a force that is as
the sum of their masses divided by the square of the
distance ; so that w hen the motion of both is re
ferred to one only, the force must be expressed by
the sum of the masses divided by the square of the
distance .
The disturbances produced by the action of the pri
mary planets on one another, are of more difficult
investigation than‘
those produced by the Sun on
the motions of the Moon , because the disturbingbody
'
18 not at an immense distance, as in the lat
ter case . The only sure wayof subj ecting them to
calculation , is by a direct'
solution'
of the Problem
of t he Three Bodies ; the part of w hich that may ,
be accounted quite elementary 18 nowto be cousi
dered.
264 . The force s w hich act upon a body to
how ever many centres they tend,and w hat ever
law they may obey,may be resolved lino th
d irec tion s of three lines or as es, glven 1n pos1t1on,
at righ t angle s to one anothe r,
This is eviden t from Dynamics, vol. 1 . 70 .
Theadvan tage of this resolution of fbrces for deter
mining the motion of a body attracted to several
centres,
PHYSICA L ASTRONOMY. 263
parallel to .r or SM, that afi'
ects the relative mo
tion ofP to S, 1s
For the action of the Sun on P being resolved as
above, the part of it that is in a direction parallel
to x or to SM is and the action of P'
on P
being resolved in like manner, the part of it paral
lel to SM ism
'
in) Now,supposing x to
vary by the momentary incremen t or fluxion 5, 3’
remaining constant , the increment of q, or q w ill
be such that 5! and thereforea,
m'
(xw hich, therefore, is the force
by which P'acts directly on P ; and if to this be
added the Sun’
s force in the same direction , viz.
the amount of the direct action of S and P’
on P, in a line parallel to SM, is
976 OUT Lnts s Or NA TURA L rut t osorm'
r.
Now, the Sun, by the united action of the plan ets P
and P', is draw n in the direction opposite to th'
m
last by a force and as the Sun is
here considered as immoveable , w e must conceive
this force to be transferred to Pin the opposite di
rection .
Thus the whole action on P, or the force F
By w riting in this formula y, y’and 31, instead ofx;
lx
’
and x, w e have F’ tr
oy
and in like manner
m 2
The substitution of these values of F, &c . in the
three formulas of the last article , w ill give three
fluxionary equat ions, On‘
which the mot ion of P
depends.
The same being done for P'
, there w ill come out six
fluxionary equations, from the in tegration of
w hich
274 ouumr s or NA-
rua a r. rm nosor nv.
a. or the motio’n'
ot‘ in; apsidt-s, s
"a due to Venus,l i t t oMm-
s, and 52 5to Jupiter
'
nearly.
b. In"the secular diminution of the fi ltration to the
centre , 4 m s is an;area of Venus, v .94 of
Mars, of fiupiter, and the rest is produ’
edd byMeretn'
y and Saturn .
A s it is not the cen tre of the Earth , but
the cen tre of gravity of the Moon and'
Earth
which desc ribe s equal areas in equal time s, about
the centre of the Sun , the regularity of the Earth’s
mot ion is disturbed on that account , and the
Earth is forc ed out of the plane of the ecliptic .
a . The irregularities thus communicated to the Earth
are, by observers on its surface , transferred to the
Sun ; the Sun, therefore, has a motion in longitude,
by which he alternat ely advances before the point
that describes the elliptical orbit in the heavens,
andlfalls behind it ; and in like manner alternately
ascen'
ds above the plane of the ecliptic, and descends
below it .
6. These inequalities are small. The -mass of the
Moon is about {3 th of that of the Earth ; the
distan ce , therefore, of the centre of gravity of the
Moon and Earth, from the centre of the latter,must be less than a semidiameter, and therefore the
in equality in the Sun’
s place must be h as than his
horizontal parallax.
1 76 ouruus s or run -
nu t. rn rt osorar .
273. The inequalit ie s of the small planets Ju
no, Vesta, Ceres and Pallas, have ne t yet been
computed ; the disturbances wh ich they must suf
fer from Mars and Jupiter are‘
no doubt con side o
table , and, on account of the ir vicinity , though
their masses are small, they may somewhat d i
sturb the motions of one anothe r. The lr act ion
on the othe r bod ies in the system is probaby ia
sensible .
A s two of these planets have nearly the se ine perim
dic time , they must preserve nearly the same dis
tance, and the some aspect w ith regard to one ano
ther. This offers a new . case in the computation
of disturbing forces, and may produce equations
of longer periods than are yet know n in our sys.
tem.
274. The ac t ion of Jupiter and Saturn on one
another, produces an inequality in the mot ion of
e ach, of considerable amoun t , and of a long pe
riod, viz. years.
a . If n express a number of years reckoned from the
beginning of 1750 , S the mean longitude of Sa
turn , and I of Jupiter, reckoned from the same
time , then the great equation that must be applied
to the‘
mean longitude of Jupiter, or to I, is
5 a x 02042733) xsin (5s e 1 n x
THYSICAL ASTRONOMY.
and that which must be applied to S is
n x 0". l ) x
sin (5S 2 I 11 x 58”.88)
These equations are to one another nearly in the ra
tio of 3 to 7. As the quantity 58 — 2 I n xrequires years to increase from 0 to
360 degrees, therefore the above equations require
that period to run through all their changes. See
LA PLAC E, Mem. Acad. dcs Sciences, 1785, 1786.
Also LA Lanna, 4 st. tom. 111. 3670.
275. Besides these two great inequalities, the re
are ten others, arising from the action ofSaturn,
to w hich Jupiter is subj ec t , and w hich may
amount w hen greatest to l l’.56 the re are also
six to which Saturn is subjec t from the act ion of
Jupiter, and these may amount to
For the part icular forms of these equations, see La
Lu na , ibid, and fi ner , Ast. vol. 111 . p. 94 . and
109 .
276 . The motion of the apsides, and the change
of eccentric ity in the orb its of Jupite r and Saturn ,are chiefly produced by the ir action on one ano
ther ; but in the d 1sturbance w hich the planes of
their orbits sufi'
e r, the other planets have”
a sen.
sible effec t.
Jumrnh.
280 oue Ns s or NATURAL r
'
n l t osorur .
time ,‘
by considering the Orb it as an elltpSis, the
elements of w hich are cont inually changing.
T his is the method of LA Gu tte rs, and is followedinthe Mecam
'
quc Celeste, Part . u. chap. 9.
Dr Hu s s y , when he predicted the return of the co.
met of 1682, took into considerat ion the actiqn of
Jupiter, and concluded that it w ould increase the
periodic time of the Comet a little more than a
year ; he therefore fixed the time of the re - appear
ance to the end Of the year 1758:PT the beginningof 1759.
He professed, however, to have made this calculationhastily, or, as he expresses it, led calayw . Synop,
sis qf the Astronomy qf Comets .
279. GLA InAUT , on calculating w ith great care
and labour the effec ts both of Jupiter and Saturn,found that the re turn of the Comet w ould be re
tarded 51 1 days by the former,and 100 by the
latte r in consequence ofw hich hefore told that its
re turn to its perihe lion would be on the i5th of
April 1759 .
He said at the same time , that he might be out a
month in his calculation. The Comet actually
reached its perihelion on the 13th of March, just
days gerlier than was predicted ; thus affordinga
anvst eA L A sr xouomv. 281
‘
a veryremarkable va ification of the theory of Gra,
vity, and'
the caleulat ion ofDisturbing Forces,
This Comet may be expected again about the year
1835. The investigations of L A PLAC E w ill re nder it much easier to calculate the quan tity bywhich its arrival may be anticipated or retarded bythe notion of the planets .
A Comet, which w as observed in 1770, had a motion,when carefully examin ed, wh ich could not
’
be we
conciled w ith a parabolic orbit, but w hich might be
represented by an elliptic orbit of moderate eccen .
tricity, in which it revolved in the space of five
years and e ight months . This Comet, how ever,
had ne ver been seen in any former revolution, nor
has it bee n seen in any subsequen t one .
980 .
'
M rBtmxm n'
r, on trac ing the path of this
C ome t , found that bet w e en the years 1767 and
1 770 , it had been ve ry near to Jupite r, and again
had come ve ry near to that planet in 1779 ; he
there fore conjec tured , that the disturbance ofJu
p ite r might have so alte red its original orbit, as to
re nde r the Come t for a t ime visible from the
Earth ; and may have so changed it'
again , hitter
one revolution ,as to restore the Comet to the same
region in w hich it had formerly moved . This
conjec ture has been confirmed by a careful appli
(sailor) of the tbtmulas of the M ecaniquc Celeste.
ourmnas or n e w e s t. rnrnosorn r .
Mr Bnm m r found that the Comet had come so
near to Jupiter between 1767 and 1770, that it
may have been brought from an orbit of which the
semitransverse w as (that of the Earth‘
s or
bit being l ), and in which it revolved in a period
of years, to one in which the semitrans
verse w as and in which it revolved in five
years and eight months, as it was at that time oh
served to do. While revolving in this orbit, it
came near to Jupiter again ; and its time of revolu
tion, and its distance w ere so changed, that the lat
ter became and the former 16 years. In
this orbit it cannot, any more than in its first,
come so new the Earth as to be visible .
The preceding is the greatest instance of disturbance
that has yet been discovered among the bodies of
our system, and furnishes a very happy and un
expected application of the theory of Gravitation.
281 . Though the Come ts are disturbed in so
great a degree by the ac tion of the Planets, they
do not appear by the ir reac tion to produce any
sensible effects.
This must no doubt arise from the small quantity of
matter which a Comet contains.
The Comet of 1770 came so near to the Earth, as to
have its periodic time increased by days, ac
cording to LA Pu c n’s computation , and if it had
been equal in mass to the Earth, it would have
made
.286 oun mzs or NATURAL ratw sornv.
Se er . IV .
or THE m sruaamvcas WHICH THE sa rumrss
or JUPITER surran FROM THE ACTION or'
os i‘
.
ANOTHER.
282. Tm; application of the same principles to
the satellites ofIupiter, has fully explained all the
irregularit ies which had been observed in their
motions, and has reduced under know n law s seve
ral others, of which the existence had been indi
stinc tly perce ived.
A very remarkable relation takes place betw een themean motions of the first three satellites, as re
marked 185; the mean motion of the first satel
lite tw ice that of the third, being equal to three
times the mean motion of the second, reckoningfrom any instant of time . L a y m an has shewn,
M ecam'
quc Celeste, liv. I t . chap . 8. that if the primi
t ive mean motion of these satellites w as near this
proportion, their mutual action on one another,
must in time have brought about an accurate con°
fom ity to it.
r a rsacA L ASTRONOMY. 285
It follows, that Long. 1a Sat. 3 Long. 2d Sat .
8 Long. 3d Sat. a constant quantity ; and it has
been found , since ever the sate llites w ere observed ,
that this con stan t quantity has been nearly equal to
This last must be the result of original con
stitution .
288: The fi rst satellite move s nearly i n the
pianoof Jupite r s equator, and has no ecbent ric i
ty exc ep tWhat is communicated to it from the
third and fourth , the irregularitie s of one of
these small planet s produc ing similar irregulari
ties i n the re st . It has heside an inequality chief.
ly produced by the action of the se cond ,’and
‘
e ir
cumsc ribed by the pe riod of d ays.
984 . T he orb it ofthe second satellite moves on a
fixed plane, to which it is inc lined at an angle of
. i3", and on which its nod e s have a ret rograde
motion , so that they comple te a revolution in
I4 years.
The motion of the nodes of this satellite 18 one of the
principal data that have been used for determiningthe masses bf the satellite s, w hich are so necessary
to be known m computing theirdisturbances . This
satelli te has no eccentricity but what it de rives
from t he action of the third and l‘
ourth.
2 85. The
ourmN58 or sta t us.“rati osdp nv.
985. The third sate llit e moves on a fixed plane
that isb e tw een the equator and the orb it ofJupiter
, and is inc lined to that plane at an angle of
its node s making a tropical revolution, (re
t rograde ), in 14 l .739 years.
The equator of Jupiter rs inclined to the plane ofhisorbit, at an angle of3° the fixed [11111108 011
which the planes of the orbits move, are determi
ned by theory, and probably could never be disco
vered by observation alon e .
286. The orbit of the third satellite is ecc entric ;but appears to have tw o d istinct equat ions of the
centre one which really a rises fromits ow n ec
centric ity and another, w hich theory shew s to be
an emanation from the equat ion of the centre of
th e fourth satellite . The first equat ion is refer
able to an apsis, w hich has an annual motion of
2° 36' forw ard in respect of the fixed stars ;
the 2d equation is refe rable to the apside s’
of the
4 th sate llite .
These two equations may be considered as formingone equation of the centre, referable to an apsis
that has an irregular motion . The twa equations
coincided in 1682, and the sum of their maxim was‘
In 1777, the equations were opposed, and
the ir difference was 5’
Observation
9290 our t mas or NATURAL rnrt osornv
II. That the planets all move in the same di'rection, as both
“
primary and secondary do
from w est to east
III. That the planes of their orbits are but littleinclined to one another.
But for these three conditions, terms of the kind
mentioned above w ould come into the expres
sion of the inequalities, which might therefore
increase w ithout limit.
These three conditions do not accesso
out of the. nature of motion or of gravitation,or from the action of any physical ca
'
use w ith
w hich w e are acquainted . Neither can theybe considered as arising from chance ; for the
probability is almost infinite to one , that,w ithout a cause particularly directed to that
object,"such aconformity could not have ari
sen in the motions of thirty- one different bo
dies scattered over such a vast extent .
The only explanation , therefore, that remains,
is, that all this is the work of intelligence and
design, directing the orig ina l constitution of thesy stem, and impressing such motions cm the parts
as were calculated tog ive stability to the whole.
396
298.
OUTLINE: NATURAL rumosornr .
Snc '
r . VI.
FIGURE OF THE EA RTH.
FROM'
observation it has already been infer
re d, that the Figure of the Earth is nearly that of
an oblate spheroid, of w hich the greateraxis, the
diameter of the equator, is to the less, the axis of
revolution , as 312 to 3 11 .
The strict mean ing of the phrase, the Figure ‘!f theEarth, has already been defined, and must be care
fully kept in view , in searching into the causes
which have determined it .
Since the Earth revolves on its axis , it is evident,
that its parts are all under the influence of a cen
trifugal force, proportional to their distances from
that axis, and that if the mass w ere fluid , the
columns toward the equator, being composed of
parts that are lighter, must extend in length, in
order to balance the columns in the direction of the
axis. By this means an oblateness or elevation at
the equator w ould be produced, similar, in some de
gree at least, to that w hich the Earth has been
found to possess . Though it is not evident how
the centrifugal force would produce such an effect
on:
300 our tmas or NATURAL rurt osornr .
But though it w as thus demonstrated that the parts
of a homogeneous fluid, on which the figure of the
oblate spheroid just described was any how indu
ccd, would be in equilibn‘
o, yet it w as not shewnconversely, that, w henever an equilibrium takes
place in such a fluid mass, the figure of the mass
must be the oblate spheroid in question . D’
A uu
ne ar indeed shew ed, that there are more sphe
roids than one in which the state of equilibrium
may be main tained ; and this result, though it was
not observed by MACLAuam , might have been in
ferred from his solution . L n Gaunaa afterw ards
proved , that the solids of equilibrium must always
be elliptic spheroids, and that in general there are
two spheroids which satisfy the conditions.
In the case of a homogeneous mass of the mean den
sity of the Earth, revolving in the space of 231156’
M, one of the spheroids is that which has been
mentioned ; the other, is one in which the equato
rial diameter is to the polar, as 681 to 1 . Mb».
Acad des Sciences, 1784 . L A Pnacn has added
the limitation which follow s.
30 3. A fluid and homogeneous mass, of the
mean density of the Earth , cannot be in squill
brium w ith an elliptic figure , if the time of its rm
tation be less than eh 25m if the time of t e
volut ion is greater than this, the re w ill always be
two
r nr srcA L ASTRONOMY. 30 1
two elliptic spheroids, and not more , in which an
equilibrium may be main tained .
If the density Of the fluid is greater than the mean
density of the Earth, the time of rotation w ith
which the equilibrium ceases to be possible , is bad,
by dividing 2“25m 1 7980 by the square root of the
density Of the fluid, that of the Ear th being unity ,
L A PLACE , Theor ie da Mous ement cc de In Figure°
des Plund er, Paris, 1784 , p . 126.
30 4 . If the fluid mass, supposed to revolve on its
axis, be not homogeneous, but be composed of
strata that increase in den sity tow ard the centre ;
the solid Of equilibrium w ill still be an e llipt ic
spheroid, but of le ss oblatene ss than if it w ere ho
mogeneous.
This w as demonstrated by C LA l nau'r , Theorie, 8m.
NEWTON fell into the mistake Of supposing the
con trary to be the case , or that the greater densi
ty tow ard the centre , w ould be accompanied w ith
greater oblateness . If the density increase , so as
at the centre to be infinite , the ellipticity is
$289 s— ‘is which is the case Of the least el
is the case Of the greatest .
296. Hence
cos OUT LrNas or NATURAL rnrt osorar .
305. Henc e , as the elliptic ity Of the Earth has
1 1been shew n to be less than
230 3 12near
ly), it is eviden t, that if the Earth is a spheroid Of
equilibrium,it is denser toward the interior.
The greater density of the Earth tow ard the centre ,
is in itself probable, and has been put beyond all
doubt by very accurate experiments, made on the
sides Of the mountain Schehallien in Perthshire , by
the late Dr MA ss vNE .
By Observations of the zenith distances Of stars,
made on the south and north sides Of that moun
tain , the difference Of the latitude of tw o stations
was de termined. A trigonometrical survey Of the
mountain , ascertained the distan ce betw een the
same tw o poin ts, and thence , from the know nlength Of a degree Of the meridian , under that pa
rallel, the differe nce of the latitude Of the stations
w as again inferred, and w as found less by l l".6
than by the astronomical Observations.
The zeniths Of the stations had therefore been sepa
rated from one another more than in the usual pro
portion Of the meridian distance ; and this could
only arise from the plummet on each side , he
ing attracted toward the body Of the mountain
303. cou rs es or NA TURAL enrt osoe nr .
ourement of degrees, and from experiments with
the pendulum.
As, in the actual figure of the Earth, the compression,
or the ellipticity, is nearly .0032, 60 . if w e take
this from .008095, the remainder, .005495, or
1is the diminution of gravity from the pole to
the equator . A nd the gravitation at any other
point of the spheroid, is g (l .0054-95sin 2 A),
g being the gravity at the equator. The length of
an isocronous pendulum is expressed by the same
formula. This agrees nearly w ith the observations
on the lengthof the pendulum in different latitudes.
See a Table of them, VINCE, Act. vol. u. p . 105.
L A L anna , Ast. 2712. Bro'r, Ast. tom. m.
p . 14-8.
The lengths of the pendulum in different latitudes, are
less subject to irregularities than the lengths of de
grees ; the intensity of gravity being, as might be
expected , less affected by local variations than its
direction .
807. The inequalities on the surface of the
Earth, and the unequal distribution of the rocks
which compose it, w ith respect to density, must
produce great local irregularities in the direc t ion
of the plumb- lin e , and are probably the causes of
the inequalities observed in the measurement of
contiguous
i n i sxcs t ASTRONOMY.“ 805I
contiguous arches of the me ridian; even where the’
work has been conduc ted w ith the greatest sk ill
and accuracy.
This is exemplified in the great areaof themeridian
measured across France ; and in thosemeasured inEngland and Hindustan . The cause may be some
thing concealed under the surface, which can at
present only be a subject of hypothet ical; or, at
best, of analogical‘
reasoning.
These irregularities are so considerable, that the’
spheroid which agrees best w ith the degrees in
France , is one having an ellipticity offile"near
ly double of what may be accounted the mean xelv
lipticity.
308. The apprmdimati'
on w hich, notw ithstand
mg these irregula rities, the figure of the Earth'
ha'
s
made to the sphe roid of equilibrium, cannot,in
a con sistency w ith other appearance s, be ascri
bed to its having been once in a fluid state .
Though the action of water may be evidently traced
in the formation of those stratified rocks whichVOL . II. U compose
0 0 7 1.1 l 0 7 NATORAL PmLOSOTHIY.
“ pose so h rge a m a th - i m m ane
fl ee s i t is of water, tunaporfing or depod tmgt be
fiugments and dem'
m d solid bodies. With re s
gud to those roch that cont’
ain no sueh detritua,
but have the eharaeter of a '
p td lil ofion in aw t
er or leu degreefi t is not eviden t that they are of
aqueous formation. The only action of watn '
,
M af which w e have pay distinct evidenee in the
roidal figune of the Earth.
let in its primit ive form, the p rominent parts
are subjec t to be worn down , and the detritus to
be carried to the low e r parts, occupied by water,
w here they acquire a horizon tal st ratification , and
are, by certain mineral ope rations, afte rwards con
solidated in to stone ; such a body, in the course
of ages, must acquire a surface every w here . at
right angle s to the direc tion of gravity, and com
sequen tly more or le ss approximating to a spin:
mid of equilibrium .
The natural history of the Earth gives great conn
tenan ce to the suppositions here in troduced ; which
therefore seem tb furnish fine most rational caplm
nation of the ellipticity belongingw the lamb, andto the planets mat ure known to revolve on their
808 ourrmns or NATURA L rurt osornr ,
Sac'r. VII .
0 1 THE PRECI SSION OF EQ UINOXES:
31 1 . THE precession of the equi-
norms, is the slowangular motion by which the intersection of the
equator and ec liptic goes backw ard, at the rate of
annually while the inclination of these
planes continues nearly the same ; so that the
pole of the equator desc ribes a c ircle about the
pole of the ecliptic in the space of 2574 8 years
nearly .
In seeking for the cause of this phenomenon, it is natural to inquire how the gravitation toward distant
bodies, such as the Sun and Moon , may afl‘
ect the
Earth’s rotation on its axis.
319 . From what has been proved of the force
w ith w hich the Sun disturbs the motion of the
Moon, it is evident, that every partic le in that he
misphere of the Earth w hich is turned tow ard the
Sun , is drawn toward that body, w hile every par
t iele in the other hemisphere, is draw n in the 0p
posite direc tion, the force that acts on any particle
be ing,
PHYSICAL a s'
raortour . 309
b eing as its distance from the plane that separates
t hese hemisphe res .
that if the Earth were a perfect
orces acting on the opposite he .
would exactly balance one another,
could produce no motion in the Earth or its
e Earth may be con sidered as a
'
sphere
by a spheroidal she ll orm ,
equator. The tendency of the Sun’3
meniscus, except at the time of the
alw ays to make it turn round the
of the equator w ith the ec liptic , to
plan e of this latter c ircle .
matter of the meniscus msy be regarded as
ring round the Earth, in the plane of the
Now , the solar foree acting on the part of
that is above the ecliptic , may at every
be resolved into two ; one of w hieh is in the
of the equator , and the other perpendicular
T he result of all the latter, must be a fores
ring a motion round itseclip tic . The same holds of
the ring that is under the ecliptic .
illthe equator had no other motion,
ound its inte rse c tion w ith the ec lipU 3 tic,
810 c ou rs es or NATURAL ra osornr .
t ic, till it coinc ided w ith that plane ; the line of
their in tersect ion remain ing all the w hile at rest.
The mean quantity of the solar force which it thus
decomposed 2; r ecs ), where as is the mass
of the Sun, a the mean distance of the Sun from
the Earth, r the radius of the equator, and 3 the
declination of the Sun .
The part of this force which is perpendicular to the
1plane of the equator, and w hich tends to make it
move round the line of its nodes, is
3m
Fr e
’
ofi X sin ) .
3 15. As the ring w hich‘
surrounds the equator,
at the same t ime that it has the tendency Just de
scribed, revolves ou an axis perpendicular to its
p lane in t wenty- four hours, it will not revolve on
either ofthese axes, but on one in the same plane
wh ich“
divides the angle b etw een them, so that
‘
the'
sine of its angular distance from each axis, is
m the inverse ratio of the angular Velocity rahad
that axis.
If the arch, round the intersection of the equator
and ecliptic, w hich the solar force acting upon the
ring or the meniscus, would make the Earth describe
,
f our tms s or us ruas t rul t osorn r .
Let ABC (fig. be the ecliptic ; the order of the
letters A , B, C , marking the order of the signs ; so
that if A be the vernal , B is the autumnal equi
no: AGB a circle perpendicular to the ecliptic
G the pole of the ecliptic ; P the pole of the equa
tor ; and APB the equinoxial colure . HG'L
‘ GK
the obliquity of the ecliptic ; HPG a parallel to
the ecliptic passing through the pole of the equator.
The equator is not represented in this figure ; but
the half of it, on the side turned tow ard the eye,
is supposed to be under the ecliptic ; its plane beingat right angles to PP.
T he change w hich the motion c makes on the pole
P, tends to bring it nearer to A . For the diurnal
revolution about the axis PD, being in the direc
tion ABC , and the motion'
about the axis AB be
ing in the direction PG, it will be in the quadrant
PA that these motions w ill be opposed, so as at a
certain point P’
(and in all the points of the line
P’D) to destroy one another. PP
’
is the arch, of
w hich the tangent has already been shewn to
fv
.
If now a great circle he described from the pole P4,it w ill be . the new equator, and the point in which
it w ill intersect the ecliptic, w ill be the new equi
nox . The relation of these small variations to one
PHYSI CA L a sraouomr . 8“
begb est seen by
’
psojeefing a pm or
aplsne touchislg the Earth ia A.
N°2.) be a small part of the ecliptic
straight line ; AP’
a like portioncolure and AQ of the equator.
H‘
AA'
he talccn equal to PP'
, in the former
and if A 'O be drawn perpendicular to AP ,
represent the new equa tor ; and AC , w hich is
{a antecedeplia, w ill represent the preces
1
however, cannot permanently revolve
diameter that is oblique to the plane of
because the centrifugal forces on Opposite
such a diameter w ould not balance one
and must therefore tend to bring the
the ring to be perpencficular to the new
to make the primitive axis ofcoincide w ith the latter.
change , therefore , w ill begin
in the former case , and the pole of tzhe
ill con stantlymove in anteceden t“round
the curve in w hich it will mm is the
K ; for as the great circle APB touches
and as the arch PP’
is veryM P’
the circumference of the latter
enlyWa quantity tha t is m nescetit ia re
cf PP’
. P'
will therd ore deacribe a circle
OM our t mxs or NATURAL rurnosopur .
round G, moving in antecedents!; at the same rate
with the line of the equiuoxes.
3 17. If, therefore, the equator had rece ived no
motion but from the solar force , its inclination to
the e cliptic would have changed con tinually ; but
the line of its intersection w ith that c ircle w ould
have remained at rest . In consequence of the d inr.
nal revolution , this efl'
ec t is entirely reve rsed 5the
inclination of the two planes remains constant , and
their intersec tion continually revolves.
This paradox is remarked by LA PLACE, Systems dz;Maude, p. 210. His solution of it is not so eleg
mentary that it could be adopted here .
318. In order to calculate the precise measures
of the d ifferen t actions that have now been traced,the momentum w ith w hich the solar force w ould
make the spheroidal mmniscus already referred to,
begin to revolve'
about the line of the equinoxes,supposing it to have no other motion , must be de
terminad ; the w hole of the terrestrial spheroid
must tend to revolve about the said axis w ith a
momentum just equal to this quantity.
Nawron, who first resolved the problem of the pre
cession, was in an error wi th respect to this part
6 16 ourme or h arve s t rurt osorur .
319. The Moon produces a similar re trograde
t ion in the intersection of the equator w ith the
plane of the lunar orbit, w hich, being proportional
to the cosine of the inclination of these planes, is
subject to continual variation ; but the mean
quantity of the precession w hich is thus produced,
relatively to the ecliptic , is the same as if the
Moon , moved in the plane of that c ircle .
LA Pu s s , Systems dag Meade,liv. 4am , chap . 13.
p . 271. 2de edit .
If the precession due to the Sun’
s force be that
which is produced by the Moon is which is
to the former nearly as 7 to 3. If the effect of
the Sun w ere reduced to that of the Moon
would be triple of it, which is agreeable to the la
test results deduced from the theory of the tides,as will be seen in the next section .
820. The
tHYSICAL a sr aosom . 847
action of the Moon prod
hich diminishes the
tional to the siga of the dlsa nce
asc ending node from theWe al
besides this, a diminution in the
e ec liptic , proportional to the co
d istance .
two inequalities constitute the Nutstion ; and
result here stated from the theory of gravita
is conformable to tha t w hich was before gi
from observat ion , 218 . Conformfi ly to what
is said there , these two inequalities may be ex
pressed by the revolution of the extremity of the'
Earth’
s axis produced to the Heavens, and describing an ellipse , as there represented ; of which the
greater axis is to the less, as the cosine of the obli
quity of the ecliptic to the cosine of twice that
39 1. The prec ession , on account of variations
in the solar ac tion,asWell as in the lunar force , is
subjec t to some inequalities, not included in the
p rec eding theorem s.
The ameunt ot‘
the pt ecessiorlfincluding all these in e
qunflties, may be calmdated for any peri od of tima,
by a formula given in the M ecenique Celeste, which»reduced to the sexagesimal notation , is
50".41.2 x t12954
'
sin 1". t298 x t . .
0 is the number of years reckoned from 1750 .
918 our tmas or naruaar. r‘
nt t osorn r .
As the annual precession is not always the same, the
length of the tropical year, in remote ages, has been
somewhat different from what it is at present . In
the age of e ancnus, it was about 10' longer.
The syderial year, as already observed, remains ia
variable .
Diurnal Rotation .
322 . The veloc ity of the Earth’s rotation on its
axis, or the length of the day, is not afi’
ec ted by
the action of the Sun or Moon , in such a de
gree as can ever become sensible, even to the ni
cest observat ion .
Systems doMaude, p . 271. The small inequalities so
produced, do not accumulate by time, but quicklycompensate one another.
323. The motions of bodies near the surface of
the Earth, tend, in some cases, to alter the veloci
ty of the diurnal rotation ; but if these motions
are only such as w e at pre sen t perce ive , their ef
fects, like the preceding, must for ever remain iri
sensible .
A body which, by descending froma height, or bymoving from the equator toward the poles, comes
nearer to the Earth’s axis, tends to accelerate the
enr stcxr. asr aonomr . 821
the form of horizontal strata, the axis of the
Earth’
s rotation may have been very diiiierent from
what it n ow is ; it may have gone through a long
series of changes, and may have’
carried the equa
tor, and the accumulation of w aters which ecoemo
paniad it, over regions from which they are now far
distant .
Many facts in the natural history of the Earth, and
of the min eral kin gdom, give countenance to these
suppositions ; and if it be true that the m an
c ient strata have been se t on edge , and that conti
nents have been raised up by the action of an ex
pe nsive force in the in te rior of the Earth, such se
t ion may have materially assisted in changing the
position of the Earth’
s axis.
Obliquity (f the Ecliptic.
325. The position of the ec lipt ic is subjec t tochange by the action of the plane ts each of them
produc ing a ret rograde mot ion in the in tersectionof the plane
'
of the ec liptic w ith the plane of its
ow n orbit . This does not affe c t the inc lination ofthe se two plane s, nor doe s it afi
'
ec t the p lane of the
equator, but it nevertheless changes the inclinaVoL. 11. X tion
622 ove ns or N ATURAL e n n osor nv.
t ion of the eclipt ic to the equator, an d also the
line of the ir inte rsec tion .
This change in the inclination , and in the position
of the line of the equinoxes, is easily dedc by
spherical trigonome try from the retrogradation of
the intersection of the two planes, and from the
constancy of the ir inclination . See L A L anna,
Aslron . 2751, &c .
826. The variat ions in the obliquity of the
e cliptic , thus produced , are among the number of
the secular inequalit ie s w hich have long periods,
and, after reaching a max imum
,re turn in a con
trary dire c t ion .
A s far back as observation goes, the obliquity of the
ecliptic has bee n diminishing, and is doing so at
present, by 52”
in a century ; it w ill not, how ever,
always continue to dimin ish, but in the course of
ages w ill again increase , oscillating backw ards andforw ards 0 11 each side of a mean , from w hich it no
ver can depart far.
The secular variation of the obliquity w as less 111 an
c ien t times than it is at presen t ; it is now n ear its
maximum, and w ill begin to decrease l n the 22d
century of our‘
era .
L A Gas s e r:has shew n , that the total change of the
obliquity, reckoning from that in 1700, must be
less than 5° 23' Mem. Acad. dc Berlin, 1782.
P. 2841.
ourmnxs or NATURAL rm LOSOPHY,
(its Equinox“, Paris, 1749. IA solution - equally cor.
‘
rect and original, w as given about the same time by"Ea t e n, Mew. Aoad. dc Berlin, 174-9.
Tw o solutions, in the Philosophical Transactions for
1 754 and 1756, continued to follow the method of
NEWTON . The first of these w as by Svnvxas nw ,
the second byWALMESLEY and this last, though it
re tained both the defects just mentioned, is remarkable for the elegance of the demonstrations . It ex
t ended the problem to the nutation of the Earth’
s
ax is, and it treated of the d iminution of the obli
quity of the ecliptic by the w h e n of the plane ts .
A memoir by L A GRANGE, on the Libratz'
on of the
Moon , w hich w as crow ned by the A cademy of Sci
ences at Paris, in 1769, con tained an excellent solu
t ion of the problem of the Precession .
Sm rsox , in his .Mz’
scellaneous Tracts, has given the
solution already referred to, w hich is one of great
simplicity and correctness. Its only defect is, that it
does not clearly point out the means by w hich the
un iform inclination of the Earth's axis is maintain
ed .
Another very elegant solution , is that of Fa 1s1 above
referred to ; Theoria Diurm'
Mates , Op era, tom. 111.
p . 292.
LA L anna has follow ed Sm r sON, as has also Vmc s , in
his Astronomy . The latest solution is that of Profes
sor Roszn'rson of Oxford, Phil. Traps. 1807 ; it is
also
enrsxcxl'
. s sraonomr. 325
also after the method of SIMPSON, and the investiga .
tion is accorate and concise .
The solutionof L A (Pub s , in the Mecam
'
que Celeste,
must be considered as the most perfect, and that
w hich can most certainly be said to include, and to
estimate w ith accuracy, all the causes w hich have a
share in this phenomenon . There is, how ever, one
defe ct it may be said to have , that as it proceeds en
tirely by the calculus, it does not sufficiently carrythe imagination along w ith it . . 1
327. Tm: alternate rise and fall of the surface
of the sea tw ice in the course of a lunar day , or of
$24,h 50
mof mean solar time , is the phenome
non known by the namc of the Tides.
The time from one high- water to the next , is, at a
mean , 12h 25m 24-00 . The in stant of low - water is
nearly, but not exactly, in the middle of this inter
val i the tide, in general, taking nine or ten mi
nutes more in ebbing than in flowing.
A t the time of new and full Moon , the tide is the
highest, and the interval betw een the consecutive
tides is the least, viz . 12h 19mm . A t the qua
dratures, or when the Sun and Moon are 90°die
stant, the tides are the least, and the in terval be
tw een them is the greatest, viz. 125301!
328. The time of high- wat er is mosdy regula
d by the Moon , and in general, in the Open sea,
from two to three hours after that plane t has
been
OUT L INES OF NA TURAL PHILO SOPHY.
At Brest, the tides Of the syzigies rise to
feet ; and those Of the quadratures to not
quite the half Of the former quantity.
In the Pacific Ocean, the rise , in the first case ,’
is 5
feet ; in the second, 2 or
The greater the rise'
of high- w ater above the level of
a fixed point , the greater the depression Of the cord
responding low- w ater relatively to the same point.
TO estimate.
the height Of the tide , it seems best to
take the excess Of the mean of the two consecutive
high- w ater marks, above the intermediate low - wa
ter. This is the method Of LA PLACE.
330 . The he ight Of the tide is affec ted by the
vic in ity Of the Moon to the Earth, and inc reases,
ca teris paribus, w hen the parallax and apparent
diamete r of the Moon inc rease , but in a higher
ratio.
The greatest variation Of the Moon’
s semidiameter
above or below the mean is about T
'
Tth of the
w hole , and the corresponding variation Of the tide
at the syzigies is 95th Of its mean quan tity . Sys
tems da Monde, p . 77 .
33 1. The rise Of the t ide is affec ted by the dc
clination of the luminaries ; it is greate st , ce teris
paribus, at the equinoxes, and least at the solsti
c es.
V Vhan.
‘
830 oun mzs or NATURAL rn t t osornv.
preaches the shores, little or no progressive ind -f
In all this, no regard is had to the operation of local
causes, w inds, currents, are . by which these general
law s are modified, or overruled .
833. The dependence of the phenomena justenume rated on the motion of the Sun and Moon,
naturally suggests an inquiry into the effec ts
w hich the act ion of the se bod ies may produce on
the w ate rs w hich cover so large a proportion of
the Earth’s surface.
884 . Ifm‘
be the mass, and a the d istance of the
Sun , 9‘
the mean rad ius of the Earth , 7. the dis:
tance of the Sun from the zen ith of any place (or
the d istance of that plac e from the poin t to w h ich
the Sun is vertical) a partic le of matte r at that
place is drawn tow ard the Suri by a forc e equal
cos 3 ; be sides having l tS gravity inst eav
sed by another force
This is derived from the resolution of forces!, in the’
same way as when the Sun’
s action on the Moon
was investigated.
PHYSLGAL m aonomr .
draw ing the water horizontallg is not
here ; its tendency 18 to increase the efst calculated .
by w hich the solar force everywhere
3 gravity, n eed not be taken into accoun t,
does not.
affect the equilibrium of the wa
eigh t.mwhiéh
'
the m w as tha s ’rise at high
level which i t ‘m h ld stand at if
as its
This is
the ‘conten t
’
of the sphe
einingw ays the smile .
The preceding is suffic ienvto shew , that
t ides are efi'
ect s that might
ed from the princ iple ofgravitat ion . This,
is an approx imation from w hich exac t
cannot b e Obtain ed ,‘
since a material
has be en le ft out, namely, the'
motion of
on w hich the forces of the Sun andexe rt ed .
The rapid motion of the w ate rs,in cousez
quence of the diurnal rotat ion, prevents them from
assuming, at every instant, the figure w hich the
equilibrium
536 our t w as or NATURAL pnrt osoeny .
For since are as the forces of the Sun and
Moon on the waters of the Sea,
and therefore m’
m’
is thus found
the mass of the Earth being 1.
842 . The tw o t ide s immediately follow ing one
mothe r, or the t ides of the day and of the n ight,
should be very unequal w hen the Sun and Moon
are distant from the equator, if the theory of the
sphe roid , 336, w ere just . They are , how ever,
nearly e qual 3 and t his has been shewn , by LA
PLA C E, to be what -must necessarily happen in the
osc illat ion s of a sea‘
ofun iform depth .
The depth of the Sea is therefore nearly the same
throughout, or, though not exactly the same , there
is a certain mean depth, from which the deviations
are not considerable , if w e take in a large extent of
ocean . If this w ere not the case, the consecutive
tides w ould not approach so near to equality 88
Great
rursrczu. asraouon r . 357
643. Great ex ten t is nec essary, in order that the
Sea should be se nsibly affected by the ac t ion of the
Sun and Moon ; for it is only by the inequality of
that ac t ion ,on d ifl
'
e rent part s'
of the ma ss rof w a
ters, that their‘
equilibr ium -is disturbed and such’
inequal ity cannot take place ;unless a great ex tenthf surface be inc luded .
The'
value‘
of cos’z; in the precedingdbr
'
mulas , be
longinglto difl
'
erent parts of the same sea, must be
oond derably differ-
ant. in order that an M llation
of the waters may be prodnc ed The saine fis true
of the'
horizon tal force , of which sin g s . is the
multiplie r. T his las t 18 0 at its maxirhum at the dis
tance'
of 46 ° from the pomt where the attract ingbody is in the zenith:
The tides which are experienced tn nar
row seas, andonshores far from the mainbody of
the ocean , are not p roduced i t) those seas by the
direct act ion of the lumin arie s, but ar e wave s pro
pagated from the great d ihrnal . undulatson ,and
moving w ith much less ve loc ity .
Of this’
, th e tide s in the German Sea, and on the
coasts of Britain , are remarkable examples .
The high- w ater transmitted from the tide in the A t
lan tic, reaches Ushan t betw een three and four
hours utter the Moon has passed the meridian , and
its ridge stretchesNW, so as to fall a little south of
Yes . H. Y the
388 0 0 1 1 18 2 8 OF NA TURA L PHILOSOPHY.
M into three ; one part pauing up the Britith
Channel, another ranging along the w est side d
Ir'
uh Chnnnel, The first ot'
tbese flow s throufllthe Chann el at the rate ot
'
about w miles an hom,
so as to pass through the Straits of Dover, and to
reach the Nore about tw elve at night. The i1a
cond , being in a more open aea, mmes w itll more
rapidity ; by six it has reached the nm'th extremi
ty ot‘
the lrish oon t ; about nine it hu got to tlieOrkney Islands, and forms a ridgepor wm extend
ing due north ; at tw elve, the summit o£ the same
w ave exteads from the cout om eastwud
to the Naze ofNorway ; and inm 1n boun mom,
it reaches the Nore , where it meets the mm ingtide, that left the mouth of the Channel only eight
hours before . Thus these two tides travel round
Britain in about tw enty - eight hom in which time
the primitive tide has gone round the whoie é fl
cumference of the Earth, and near ly w eep ”
vol. 1. pl!“xm iii. fig.581.
oun m s s or ram -
vain . rnrt osornv.
other than the inverse ratio of the squares of the dis.
tances . The expression for the force w hich this law
affords, viz. the quan tity of matter, d ivided by thesquare of the distance , is a line , or a magnitude of
one d imension , as the expression of a force must al»
w ays be w hen reduced to the utmost simplicity.
L astly, The lines described by two bodies attracting
one another according to this law , are always of the
second order . No other law could give the same sim
plicity to tbe'
celestial motions, nor is it likely that
any one could produce the same stability.
Gravitation , nevertheless, is not conceived by us as a
property essential to matter ; there may be manyother law s equally possible , an d the above considera
tions poin t out the law actually existing, as one that
has been w isely selected out of an infin ite number .
.
I’ there,then, any physical ca
’
use, yet more general,
intowhich Gravitation maybe resolved or isit an ui
f‘a
l
c
rt, beyond w hich our know ledge cannot ex.
tend we look at the ill success of the attornpts
hitherto made to explain gravitation, w e shall be dis
posed to embrace the latter opin ion, and to apply the
max im of Bacon Est eaten; e quc fmper r‘
t i ct leci
O
gi"viii
i ihow man
Q5