Dissolved organic carbon in peat porewater increases with warming: a field manipulation experiment...

18
Peat porewater dissolved organic carbon concentration and lability increase with warming: a field temperature manipulation experiment in a poor-fen Evan S. Kane Lynn R. Mazzoleni Carley J. Kratz John A. Hribljan Christopher P. Johnson Thomas G. Pypker Rodney Chimner Received: 8 October 2013 / Accepted: 9 January 2014 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Abstract Studies conducted across northern Europe and North America have shown increases in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in aquatic systems in recent decades. While there is little consensus as to the exact mechanisms for the increases in DOC, hypotheses converge on such climate change factors as warming, increased precipitation variability, and changes in atmospheric deposition. In this study, we tested the effects of warming on peat porewater composition by actively warming a peatland with infrared lamps mounted 1.24 m above the peat surface for 3 years. Mean growing season peat temperatures in the warmed plots (n = 5) were 1.9 ± 0.4 °C warmer than the control plots at 5 cm depth (t statistic = 5.03, p = 0.007). Mean porewater DOC concentrations measured throughout the growing season were 15 % higher in the warmed plots (73.4 ± 3.2 mg L -1 ) than in the control plots (63.7 ± 2.1 mg L -1 ) at 25 cm (t = 4.69, p \ 0.001). Furthermore, DOC from the warmed plots decayed nearly twice as fast as control plot DOC in laboratory incubations, and exhibited lower aromaticity than control plot porewater (reduction in SUVA 254 in heated plots compared with control plots). Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) concentrations Responsible Editor: Jan Mulder E. S. Kane U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Houghton, MI 49931, USA E. S. Kane (&) Á C. J. Kratz Á J. A. Hribljan Á C. P. Johnson Á T. G. Pypker Á R. Chimner School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA e-mail: [email protected] C. J. Kratz e-mail: [email protected] J. A. Hribljan e-mail: [email protected] C. P. Johnson e-mail: [email protected] T. G. Pypker e-mail: [email protected] R. Chimner e-mail: [email protected] L. R. Mazzoleni Department of Chemistry, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA e-mail: [email protected] Present Address: C. P. Johnson Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA Present Address: T. G. Pypker Department of Natural Resources, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BC V2C OC8, Canada 123 Biogeochemistry DOI 10.1007/s10533-014-9955-4

Transcript of Dissolved organic carbon in peat porewater increases with warming: a field manipulation experiment...

Peat porewater dissolved organic carbon concentrationand lability increase with warming: a field temperaturemanipulation experiment in a poor-fen

Evan S. Kane • Lynn R. Mazzoleni • Carley J. Kratz • John A. Hribljan •

Christopher P. Johnson • Thomas G. Pypker • Rodney Chimner

Received: 8 October 2013 / Accepted: 9 January 2014

� Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Abstract Studies conducted across northern Europe

and North America have shown increases in dissolved

organic carbon (DOC) in aquatic systems in recent

decades. While there is little consensus as to the exact

mechanisms for the increases in DOC, hypotheses

converge on such climate change factors as warming,

increased precipitation variability, and changes in

atmospheric deposition. In this study, we tested the

effects of warming on peat porewater composition by

actively warming a peatland with infrared lamps

mounted 1.24 m above the peat surface for 3 years.

Mean growing season peat temperatures in the warmed

plots (n = 5) were 1.9 ± 0.4 �C warmer than the

control plots at 5 cm depth (t statistic = 5.03,

p = 0.007). Mean porewater DOC concentrations

measured throughout the growing season were 15 %

higher in the warmed plots (73.4 ± 3.2 mg L-1) than in

the control plots (63.7 ± 2.1 mg L-1) at 25 cm

(t = 4.69, p \ 0.001). Furthermore, DOC from the

warmed plots decayed nearly twice as fast as control plot

DOC in laboratory incubations, and exhibited lower

aromaticity than control plot porewater (reduction in

SUVA254 in heated plots compared with control plots).

Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) concentrations

Responsible Editor: Jan Mulder

E. S. Kane

U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station,

Houghton, MI 49931, USA

E. S. Kane (&) � C. J. Kratz � J. A. Hribljan �C. P. Johnson � T. G. Pypker � R. Chimner

School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science,

Michigan Technological University, Houghton,

MI 49931, USA

e-mail: [email protected]

C. J. Kratz

e-mail: [email protected]

J. A. Hribljan

e-mail: [email protected]

C. P. Johnson

e-mail: [email protected]

T. G. Pypker

e-mail: [email protected]

R. Chimner

e-mail: [email protected]

L. R. Mazzoleni

Department of Chemistry, Michigan Technological

University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA

e-mail: [email protected]

Present Address:

C. P. Johnson

Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of

Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison,

WI 53706, USA

Present Address:

T. G. Pypker

Department of Natural Resources, Thompson Rivers

University, Kamloops, BC V2C OC8, Canada

123

Biogeochemistry

DOI 10.1007/s10533-014-9955-4

tracked DOC patterns as expected, but the amount of

dissolved N per unit C decreased with warming.

Previous work has shown that warming increased net

primary production at this site, and together with

measured increases in the activities of chitinases and

glucosidases we suggest that the increased DOC

concentrations observed with warming were derived

in part from microbial-plant interactions in the rhizo-

sphere. We also detected more nitrogen containing

compounds with higher double bond equivalents (DBE)

unique to the warmed plots, within the pool of

biomolecules able to deprotonate (16 % of all com-

pounds identified using ultrahigh resolution ion elec-

trospray mass spectrometry); we suggest these

compounds could be the products of increased plant,

microbial, and enzyme activity occurring with warming.

With continued warming in peatlands, an increase in

relatively labile DOC concentrations could contribute to

dissolved exports of DOC in runoff, and would likely

contribute to the pool of efficient electron donors (and

acceptors) in the production of CO2 and CH4 in

terrestrial and aquatic environments.

Keywords Peat � Climate change �Extracellular enzyme � Dissolved organic

nitrogen � Dissolved organic carbon � Ericaceae �Sedge

Introduction

Long-term studies of northern peatlands and brown-

water fed freshwater bodies of Europe and North

America have revealed increasing concentrations of

dissolved organic carbon (DOC) over the last two

decades (Freeman et al. 2001a; Driscoll et al. 2003;

Worrall et al. 2003; Freeman et al. 2004; Evans et al.

2005; Yallop et al. 2010; Urban et al. 2011). In carbon

rich ecosystems such as northern peatlands, DOC

pools are significant (Battin et al. 2009) and fluxes of

DOC can be similar in magnitude to that of long-term

C accrual in dead organic matter (Moore 2003; cf.

Rapalee et al. 1998). Not only are DOC pools and

fluxes important to consider with respect to carbon

cycling, but changes in DOC concentrations affect

critical ecosystem properties in aquatic environments,

such as pH (Kullberg et al. 1993), light attenuation

(Bukaveckas and Robbins-Forbes 2000), mineral

complexation and the mobility of heavy metals (Urban

et al. 1990; Kolka et al. 2001), peat porewater

electrochemistry and microbial activity (Heitmann

et al. 2007; Alewell et al. 2008; Keller et al. 2009) and

foodweb structure (Hessen 1992). It is therefore

important to understand the direct mechanisms driving

the observed increases in DOC concentrations.

To date there is still uncertainty associated with

identifying the primary drivers of observed increases

in DOC concentrations in a wide range of ecosystems

(Sucker and Krause 2010; Clark et al. 2010; Preston

et al. 2011). Debate surrounding the isolation of single

mechanisms responsible has focused on factors related

to climate change, notably increasing temperatures

(Freeman et al. 2001a), changes in atmospheric

deposition (Monteith et al. 2007; Clark et al. 2010;

Evans et al. 2012), altered precipitation or drainage

patterns (Strack et al. 2008; Holl et al. 2009; Kane

et al. 2010), and increased atmospheric CO2 concen-

tration (Freeman et al. 2004; Fenner et al. 2007;

Johansson et al. 2009). At the heart of uncertainty

concerning a direct mechanism for increasing DOC

concentrations in streams (considered as an export

from the terrestrial system) is distinguishing between

changes in soil DOC concentrations versus changes in

runoff patterns and hydrologic connectivity (Tranvik

and Jansson 2002; Roulet and Moore 2006). As such,

studies involving landscape temperature gradients

(Kane et al. 2006; Borken et al. 2011) or mesocosms

(Judd and Kling 2002; Blodau et al. 2004) report

increased soil DOC concentrations with warming, but

consensus as to the direct effects of temperature on

DOC concentrations in runoff are mixed (Pastor et al.

2003; Porcal et al. 2009; Clark et al. 2009; Preston

et al. 2011). Notwithstanding, peatlands (or Histosols)

in particular have been shown to be strong sources of

DOC export in comparisons across diverse catchment

types (Aitkenhead and McDowell 2000; Alvarez-

Cobelas et al. 2012). Improved understanding of the

underlying mechanisms of changes in DOC concen-

trations in peatlands is necessary to understand

observed changes in DOC export and to predict future

changes in DOC.

The concentration of peat porewater DOC is largely

dependent on the relativity between DOC production

and consumption in the soil matrix, and both of these

processes are likely to increase with temperature in

northern organic soils. DOC production increases with

temperature-mediated increases in plant production,

owing to root exudates (Kuzyakov 2002; Freeman

Biogeochemistry

123

et al. 2004) and changes in the types and activities of

extracellular enzymes exuded (Fenner et al. 2007) and

increased inputs and leaching of plant litter and soils

(McDowell and Likens 1988; Moore and Dalva 2001;

Park et al. 2002). DOC production also increases as the

turnover of dead organic matter increases (which

increases with temperature), as the water-soluble

products of decomposition accumulate (Kalbitz et al.

2000; Michalzik et al. 2001). DOC mineralization can

also increase with temperature (Moore et al. 2008),

with rates of change being dependent on structural

characteristics of the DOC (Christ and David 1996;

Michaelson et al. 1998; Wickland et al. 2007). Since

DOC is produced by microbes while also being a labile

substrate for microbial activity (McKnight and Aiken

1998), production and consumption relationships of

DOC are hard to disentangle (Muller-Wegener 1988;

Neff and Hooper 2002; Kalbitz et al. 2003). Field

manipulation studies with controls over variables

which co-vary with temperature are necessary to test

specific mechanisms for the observed increases in

DOC concentrations with warming (cf. Jassey et al.

2013).

Accumulation of the water-soluble products of

decaying organic matter in response to warmer tem-

peratures is also affected by enzyme production and

biophysical limitations to the microbial decay of DOC.

Microbial acquisition of nutrients is primarily exe-

cuted through the release of extracellular enzymes.

These enzymes depolymerize organic matter hydro-

lytically (Sinsabaugh et al. 2008) and oxidatively

(Sinsabaugh 2010) to release soluble components

which can be assimilated by microorganisms (see

reviews by Munster and de Haan 1998; Nannipieri

et al. 2002; Caldwell 2005; Burns et al. 2013). Exactly

how sensitive enzyme activities are to changes in

temperatures can be described using the first principles

of thermodynamics, with the sensitivity of organic

matter degradation being directly related to the acti-

vation energy of a particular enzyme (Wallenstein et al.

2011). This is an important additional consideration in

northern organic soils because the temperature sensi-

tivities of enzyme activity are generally higher in

colder environments (Koch et al. 2007). For example,

Wallenstein et al. (2009) found that temperature

explained 72 % of the variation in modeled hydrolytic

enzyme activity (b-glucosidase) in tundra soil. More-

over, Jassey et al. (2012) recently demonstrated that

oxidative enzyme activity (peroxidase) increased by

over 30 % with passive warming in a Sphagnum

peatland. To date the direct effects of enzyme activity

on DOC concentrations in peatland ecosystems have

largely assumed DOC accumulates when enzyme

function is inhibited, such as by complexation with

organic molecules (Joanisse et al. 2007) or with the

presence of oxygen (Freeman et al. 2001b, 2004).

Relationships between DOC and extracellular enzyme

activities are not straightforward, and there may be

positive feedbacks wherein labile DOC promotes

hydrolytic enzyme production, which in turn increases

the quantity of DOC (Shackle et al. 2000). However,

there is almost no work investigating in situ temper-

ature effects on hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme

function, and how these factors in turn effect DOC

concentrations in northern peatlands.

To examine the direct effects of warming on peat

porewater composition, we actively heated the soil

surface of a poor fen peatland ecosystem in northern

Michigan, USA for three growing seasons (Johnson

et al. 2013). We used a combination of spectral

indexes, porewater incubation studies (for mineraliza-

tion and enzymatic activities), ion chromatography,

and ultra-high resolution electrospray ionization mass

spectrometry to test our hypotheses. We hypothesized

that DOC inputs to porewater derived in part from

microbial/plant interactions in the rhizosphere would

outstrip losses from DOC mineralization in the heated

plots, leading to an increase in porewater DOC quantity

and quality (or lability) with warmer temperatures. We

expected higher activities of both hydrolytic and

oxidative enzymes with warming, which would also

increase DOC concentrations through the cycling of

phenolic compounds. Alternatively, warming could

cause a reduction in the solubility of oxygen, which

would lead to a decrease in phenol-oxidase activity.

We hypothesized that microtopography (hummock vs.

hollow or lawns) would be a significant arbiter of

temperature effects on DOC concentrations, owing to

changes in thermal conductivity and relative water

table position with change in peat microtopography.

Methods and materials

Study site and instrumentation

The study site is located in a poor fen peatland on the coast

of Lake Superior in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan,

Biogeochemistry

123

USA near the town of Pequaming (46.85�N 88.37�W,

Elev. 183 m). The peatland initiated *2,225 years ago

on a tombolo in Lake Superior and has 290 cm of sedge

and Sphagnum peat overlying sandy mineral soil (Bois-

vert 2009). The peatland is categorized as a barrier beach

lagoon-tombolo (Albert et al. 2005). Hummock and lawn

microtopography is prevalent, with vegetation typical of

poor fens in the region (trees: Picea mariana and Larix

laricina; shrubs: Chamaedaphne calyculata, Ledum

groenlandicum, Kalmia polifolia, Andromeda glauco-

phylla, Myrica gale, Vaccinium oxycoccos; herbs: Dro-

sera rotundifolia, Sarracenia purpurea; sedges: Carex

oligosperma, C. exilis, C. utriculata; mosses: Sphagnum

fuscum, S. rubellum, S. magellanicum, S. papillosum).

The average annual temperature and total precipitation

for the region are 4.5 �C and 833 mm, respectively.

Our study consisted of 10, 2 m by 1 m plots that

were divided equally between hummocks and lawns.

Plot locations were chosen based on available micro-

topography and were randomly subdivided into heated

or control treatments. The heating treatments consisted

of infrared lamps (MRM-1215, Kalglo Electronics

Company Ltd., Bethlehem, PA, USA; 1,500 W,

165 cm long) positioned 124 cm above the peat

surface on steel conduit that was anchored into the

underlying sandy substrate, as described in detail by

Johnson et al. (2013). Elevated boardwalks and planks

were built to allow access to all plots without damaging

vegetation. Warming occurred in three different peri-

ods: 2008 from June to November (initiation phase,

data not presented); 2009 from May to December; and

2010 from April to November.

The study area was instrumented with an air

temperature/relative humidity sensor (CS-215, Camp-

bell-Scientific Inc., Logan, UT, USA; height =

183 cm) and a tipping bucket rain gauge (TE525WS,

Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA; height =

100 cm) wired to a datalogger (CR1000, Campbell-

Scientific Inc.). Data were collected every minute, and

were binned into 20 min averages. Within each plot, a

thermocouple (Type-T copper constantan, Campbell-

Scientific Inc.) was installed 5 cm below the peat

surface and wired to a multiplexor (AM25T, Camp-

bell-Scientific Inc.) and a datalogger. Water table

levels were measured at 1-h intervals in a 1.5 m long,

10 cm diameter PVC well with a water table logger

(Levellogger Junior, Solinst, Georgetown, Ontario,

Canada) and a barometric pressure logger (Barrolog-

ger Gold, Solinst, Georgetown, Ontario). Volumetric

water content at 0–6 and 0–12 cm vertically beneath

the Sphagnum moss surface at each plot was measured

manually with a HydroSense� Water Content Sensor

(Campbell Scientific Inc., Australia) in July–October

of 2010. Temperature data from the nearby MTU Ford

Center Research Forest in Alberta, MI were used to

compare mean growing season temperatures and

summed degree-days (SDD; sum of mean daily

air temperatures [10 �C) from June–September,

2009–2011.

Porewater collection and analysis

Porewater was harvested from piezometers approxi-

mately bi-weekly throughout the growing seasons of

2009–2010, and approximately monthly following the

cessation of the heating treatments in 2011. Piezom-

eters were constructed of 2.54 cm diameter polyvinyl-

chloride pipe with 10 cm slotted regions covered with

40 lm Nitex nylon mesh. Slotted regions were

centered at depths of 25 and 50 cm beneath the peat

surface. Prior to sampling for chemical analyses, the

piezometers were pumped dry and allowed to

recharge. A small amount of pore water was pumped

into the collection flask as a pre-rinse for sample

collection in high density polyethylene (HDPE) Nal-

gene bottles. Approximately 150 mL of sample was

collected, and then samples were kept on ice packs in a

cooler and brought back to the laboratory where they

could be filtered through 0.45 lm nylon membrane

filters (less than a day from time of collection). After

filtration, samples were split into three parts: (1)

50 mL was acidified (pH 2) and refrigerated prior to

DOC and TDN analysis, (2) 50 mL was kept frozen

prior to anion and organic acid analysis, and (3) 10 mL

was diluted (1:10) and its ultraviolet absorbance at

k = 254 nm was immediately determined on a spec-

trophotometer using a 1 cm quartz cuvette (Spectra-

Max M2 multimode microplate reader; Molecular

Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Blanks

of deionized water (with and without acidification)

were run with all analyses (approximately one for

every 15 samples). DON and TDN were run with a

TOCV Analyzer with TDN module, (Shimadzu Sci-

entific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA), and nitrate

(NO3-), acetate, formate, and oxalate were deter-

mined with an ICS-2000 ion chromatograph with an

IonPac AS11 separator column (Dionex Corporation,

Bannockburn, IL, USA). Ammonium (NH4–N) was

Biogeochemistry

123

determined spectrophotometrically using salicylate

and cyanurate reagents (Hach Co., Loveland, CO,

USA) following Sinsabaugh et al. (2000). Dissolved

organic N (DON) was determined as the difference

between TDN and dissolved inorganic N (DIN;

NH4–N plus NO3–N). We calculated specific ultravi-

olet absorbance (SUVA) by dividing absorbance at

k = 254 nm by DOC concentration, and reported

SUVA254 of DOC in units of L mg C-1 m-1. Total

dissolved iron concentrations were quantified spec-

trophotometrically (ammonium thioglycolate reagent,

Martini instruments MI 408 Iron High Range Meter,

Rocky Mount, NC, USA) throughout the summer of

2010 to determine possible interferences with

SUVA254 (cf. Weishaar et al. 2003). Dissolved oxygen

(DO) and specific conductivity were measured at 25

and 50 cm depths throughout the growing season.

Measurements were made within a slotted PVC well

(capped when not being measured) with Hach probes

(LDO101 and CDC401 probes with a HQ40d18 meter;

Hach Co., Loveland, CO, USA) which were calibrated

monthly with water-saturated air for DO and at

1,000 lS cm-1 (as NaCl) for conductivity.

Ultrahigh-resolution ESI-FT-ICR MS analysis

A 10 mL aliquot was prepared for Electrospray

Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Reso-

nance Mass Spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR MS) analysis

using solid phase extraction (Strata-X; Phenomenex

Inc., Torrence, CA, USA). For this purpose, 10 mL of

filtered and frozen porewater from two warmed plots

and two control plots in 2009, when the DOC

concentration differences were the greatest between

treatments at 25 cm (day of year 249). These samples

were applied to Strata-X solid phase extraction

cartridges (pre-conditioned with methanol and aceto-

nitrile), the cartridges were rinsed with high purity

water and dried, and DOC was washed out with

1.5 mL methanol (CHROMSOLV for HPLC). Sam-

ples were stored at -5 �C until further analysis.

The ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometric ana-

lysis was performed on a 7 tesla FT-ICR MS (LTQ FT

Ultra, Thermo Scientific) equipped with an ESI

source. For the analysis, the signal was optimized

with methanol dilution. The solution was directly

infused at 4 lL min-1 into the ESI interface. The ESI

probe was placed in position ‘‘B’’ and the needle

voltage was set between -3.7 and -3.8 kV (blanks

were run at -4.0 kV). The sample delivery apparatus

was flushed after each run with a minimum of 500 lL

of methanol/water (50/50) and 100 % methanol until

background noise level was reached. Negative ion

mass spectra were collected for the mass range of

100 \ m/z \ 1,000. The mass resolving power was set

at 400,000 (defined at m/z 400). Automatic gain

control was used to consistently fill the instrument

with the same number of ions (n = 1 9 106) for each

acquisition to avoid space charge effects from over

filling the mass analyzer. The instrument was exter-

nally calibrated in negative ion mode with a standard

solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate and taurocholic

acid, and the resulting mass accuracy was better than

2 ppm. Over 200 individual mass spectra were

collected and stored as transients by use of Thermo

Xcalibur software (Thermo Scientific, USA). Repli-

cate mass analysis was performed. Variances in the

analyte intensity and the reproducibility of low

relative abundance (RA) signals were calculated from

the replicate analyses.

Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR MS data were pro-

cessed using Sierra Analytics Composer software

previously described (Mazzoleni et al. 2010; Putman

et al. 2012). Briefly, *200 transients recorded in the

time domain were co-added to improve analyte detec-

tion (Kujawinski 2002; Stenson et al. 2003). The

molecular formula calculator was set to allow up to 70

carbon (C), 140 hydrogen (H), 25 oxygen (O), and 4

nitrogen (N) atoms per molecular formula composition.

A higher number of N was tested during the method

development. However, a higher number of chemically

unreasonable formula assignments without a significant

increase to the proportion of the assigned total ion

current was observed. Thus, the more conservative

method (with N B 4) was selected. The molecular

formula calculator, based on the PREDATOR algorithm

(Blakney et al. 2005), uses a Kendrick mass analysis

(Hughey et al. 2001) to sort ions into CH2 ‘‘homologous

series’’ and then assigns the de novo molecular formulas

B500 Da. In other words, all of the ions[500 Da either

belong to a CH2 series with de novo formulas B500 Da

or were not assigned. A threshold of 6 times the root

mean square values between 950\ m/z \ 1,000

(RA C 0.4 %) was applied to the data. Formulas

containing 13C corresponding to the monoisotopic

masses were also assigned and evaluated. Blank samples

were analyzed using the same method. The molecular

formulas resulting in measurement errors[3 ppm were

Biogeochemistry

123

discarded. Additional data filtering of the assigned

formulas was done by applying rules and assumptions as

described by Koch et al. (2005).

Enzyme activity assays

Enzyme assays were conducted on porewater samples

harvested prior to and following the senescence of

vegetation (early September and late October, respec-

tively). The enzymes assays were conducted using a

96-well plate format according to Sinsabaugh et al.

(2005). There were 16 technical replicates per sample.

Each replicate contained 200 lL of porewater and 50 lL

of substrate. Hydrolytic enzyme activity was estimated

using 200 lM fluorometric substrates including acid

phosphatase, b-glucosidase (glucosidase), cellobiohy-

drolase (cellulase) and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (chiti-

nase). The hydrolytic enzyme assays included a blank

with 250 lL of reverse osmosis water, a substrate

correcting blank containing 200 lL of water and 50 lL

of substrate, a quenching blank containing 200 lL of

water and 50 lL of methylumbelliferone. Each of these

had 8 technical replicates per plate. Additionally, there

were 8 technical replicates containing 50 lL of meth-

ylumbelliferone and 200 lL of porewater for each

sample to calculate the quenching coefficient. Oxidative

enzyme activity was estimated using the L-dihydroxy-

phenylalanine (L-DOPA) substrate method to measure

phenol oxidase and peroxidase activity. There were 16

technical replicatesper sample, and 8 technical replicates

for blanks including 250 lL of water, 200 lL of buffer

and 50 lL of 5 mM L-DOPA substrate, and 200 lL of

porewater with 50 lL of water. The peroxidase assays

also had 10 lL of H2O2 added to all wells. All samples

were incubated at room temperature. Hydrolytic enzyme

samples incubated for 2 h, and then 10 lL of 1.0 M

NaOH was added to each well in order to stop the

reaction. Fluorescence was measured at an excitation of

364 nm and an emission wavelength of 450 nm using a

SpectraMax M2 plate reader (Molecular Devices Cor-

poration, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Oxidative enzyme

samples incubated for 24 h and the absorbance was

measured at 450 nm. Enzyme activities were calculated

according to German et al. 2011.

Porewater incubation

In May of 2010, 150 mL of porewater was harvested

from three heated and three control plots at 25 cm

depth. Samples from each plot were filtered as

previously described and 30 mL was put into five

60 mL precleaned and sample-rinsed HDPE bottles,

for a total of 30 bottles. 1 mL of common inoculum of

pore water filtered through a 1.6 mm glass fiber filter

(sequentially diluted to 10-3) was pipetted into each

bottle, following methods described by Wickland et al.

(2007). Bottles were then capped, gently shaken, and

incubated at 20 �C. A subset of six bottles (three

heated and three control plots) was acidified to

pH = 2 and measured for DOC and TDN concentra-

tions on the day the incubation was set up and 7, 14,

21, and 56 days later.

Statistical analyses

A repeated measures analysis of variance was con-

ducted using PROC MIXED to test for differences in

pore water DOC, DON, and SUVA254 between heated

and control treatments (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC,

USA, version 9.2). Warming treatment, depth, micro-

topography (hummock or hollow/lawn), day of year,

year, and depth and warming interactions were treated

as fixed effects, and day of year was treated as a

repeated measures with plot number acting as the

subject. We used variance components symmetry

covariance structure for repeated measures analysis as

determined by looking at the fit statistics and the

Kenward and Roger’s correction for degrees of

freedom (Littell et al. 2006). Type-3 tests of fixed

effects were considered significant at p \ 0.05. Ana-

lysis of covariance was used to determine the signif-

icance of changes in the relationship between DOC

and DON as a function of heating (Cody and Smith

1997). Least-squared mean value comparisons by

heating treatment and depth employed the Tukey–

Kramer adjustment. For comparisons of seasonal

mean values between heated and control plots we

conducted two-tailed t tests (a = 0.05).

Results

Temperature effects on DOC concentrations

Mean monthly peat temperatures measured at five cm

were 1.9 �C warmer in the heated plots (mean ± stan-

dard error; 18.4 ± 0.2 �C) than in the control plots

Biogeochemistry

123

(16.5 ± 0.2 �C) measured from June–August, 2009–

2010 (t = 5.03, p = 0.007). There was no significant

difference in mean monthly temperatures across

hummock or lawn microtopographies across all sam-

pling times at 5 cm (t = 0.18, p = 0.86), but some

opposing trends in temperatures between hummocks

and lawns were observed in June and July (Fig. 1e, f).

Mean temperatures measured at 42 cm throughout the

growing season of 2010 were not significantly differ-

ent between heated (16.6 ± 0.2 �C) and control plots

(16.3 ± 0.1 �C). Mean seasonal dissolved O2 concen-

tration at 50 cm was 1.1 ± 0.8 mg L-1 and mean

seasonal conductivity was 53.1 ± 4.7 lS s-1. Dis-

solved O2 declined as temperature increased in con-

current measurements at 50 cm throughout the growing

season (r = -0.69, F1,14 = 11.98, p = 0.004).

Growing season precipitation (May–September)

was 343 mm in 2009 and 483 in 2010, but mean

monthly water table depths (below peat surface) were

not different between 2009 (13.7 ± 3.2 cm) and 2010

(16.4 ± 3.1 cm) (t = 1.90, p = 0.15). The plots

received 40 % more precipitation in July of 2010

(77 mm) than in July of 2009 (47 mm), but mean July

water table depths were similar for these 2 months

(15.2 ± 2.5 vs. 16.8 ± 1.4 cm, respectively). Mean

peat moisture at 6 cm (6.0 ± 0.6 g g-1) and at 12 cm

(15.1 ± 2.1 g g-1) measured throughout the growing

season were not significantly different between heated

and control plots (t = 0.45, p = 0.66; and t = 0.34,

p = 0.74, respectively).

Mean peat porewater DOC concentrations at 25 cm

were 15 % higher in the heated plots (73.4 ±

3.2 mg L-1) than in the control plots (63.6 ± 2.1

mg L-1) across all sampling times in 2009–2010

(t = 4.69, p \0.001) (Fig. 2). Mean monthly porewater

DOC concentrations at 50 cm were not significantly

different between heated and control plots in 2009

(t = 1.01, p = 0.35; mean of 69.9 ± 2.0 mg L-1), but

were significantly different in 2010 (t = 4.47,

p = 0.001). There was a significant warming treatment

effect on DOC concentrations after accounting for

seasonal changes (Table 1). In fact, the increases in

mean monthly DOC concentrations in heated plots

relative to control plots generally corresponded with

mean increases in peat temperatures (Fig. 3). The largest

increases in DOC and peat temperature in heated plots

relative to control plots occurred later in the growing

season (August and September). There were no changes

in DOC concentrations by year (Fig. 2), depth, or

microtopography (hummock or lawn terrain)

(Table 1A). In 2011 there was no power being supplied

to the infrared lamps, and there were no differences in

mean DOC concentrations between the previously

heated (83.2 ± 3.4 mg L-1) and control (84.7 ±

5.3 mg L-1) plots measured at 25 cm throughout

June-October (n = 6 sampling dates, t = 0.33,

p = 0.76).

Fig. 1 Seasonal differences between the mean hourly peat temperatures (5 cm) of plots heated with infrared lamps and unheated

control plots. Negative values in pane (a) indicate periods when the heated plots were actually cooler than the control plots

Biogeochemistry

123

2009 2010

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

DO

C a

t 25

cm

(mg

L -1 )

control

heated

40

50

60

70

80

90

172

183

197

207

224

249

338

113

121

136

160

177

199

216

233

247

274

286

295

DO

C a

t 50

cm

(mg

L -1 )

Fig. 2 Mean daily DOC concentrations for heated and control plots at 25 cm (top pane) and 50 cm (bottom pane) throughout

2009–2010. Error bars are standard errors of the mean values

Table 1 Mixed-effects model of predictors of (A) dissolved

organic carbon and (B) dissolved organic nitrogen

Term Fixed

effects

F value

Degrees of

freedom

(num, den)

p

A: DOC

Depth 1.7 1, 276 0.1931

DOY 10.32 18, 276 \.0001

Heated or control 15.7 1, 276 \.0001

Hummock or lawn 1.69 1, 276 0.1944

DOY 9 heated 1.16 18, 276 0.291

Depth 9 heated 8.82 1, 276 0.0032

B: DON

Depth 0.89 1, 204 0.3460

DOY 5.64 16, 204 \.0001

Heated or control 0.15 1, 204 0.7030

Hummock or lawn 1.32 1, 204 0.2526

DOY 9 heated 0.71 16, 204 0.7868

Depthv 9 heated 5.56 1, 204 0.0193

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

*Jul

R2 = 0.99p = 0.004

R2 = 0.83p = 0.09

-5

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Mea

n in

crea

se in

DO

C

rela

tive

to c

on

tro

l plo

ts (2

5 cm

, mg

L -1

)

Mean increase in peat temperature relative to control plots (5 cm, °C)

2009

2010

Fig. 3 Mean monthly increases in peat temperature are compared

to mean monthly increases in porewater DOC concentrations at

25 cm. Asterisk denotes a point not included in the regression

owing to a period of relatively heavy rainfall (standardized residual

error = 1.32). Error bars are standard errors of the mean values

Biogeochemistry

123

Temperature effects on porewater composition

and quality

A significant change in DOC with heating, with no

significant change in DON, would result in a different

DOC:DON ratio in response to heating. While DOC and

DON both exhibited significant seasonal changes, there

was no direct effect of heating on porewater DON

concentrations across all samples (Table 1B). There was

an interaction between heating and depth in explaining

variation in DON concentrations (Table 1B), owing to

the increase in DON at 25 cm in heated plots

(1.31 ± 0.06 mg N L-1) compared to control plots

(1.20 ± 0.06 mg N L-1) across all dates (t = 2.37,

p = 0.03); this difference was not found at 50 cm

(t = 1.14, p = 0.27). As expected, DON increased with

DOC, and there was a marginal interaction between

heating and DOC in explaining variation in DON

(F1,240 = 2.90, p = 0.09; Fig. 4). When the correlation

between DOC and DON was accounted for in

ANCOVA, heating had a weak but significant effect

on DON concentrations across all sampling depths

(F1,240 = 4.19, p = 0.04). As such, the amount of DON

per unit DOC declined in heated plots relative to control

plots (Fig. 4). Mean DIN concentrations were small

across all sampling times (0.08 ± 0.02 mg N L-1), and

there were no significant differences between heated and

control plots (t = 1.06, p = 0.29).

Heating significantly reduced porewater aromatic-

ity (Fig. 5). Porewater aromaticity changed with depth

and season as could be expected, but also changed

with heating and was a significant covariate with the

DOC:DON ratio (Table 2). Mean total dissolved Fe

concentrations were not different between heated

(2.1 ± 0.4 mg L-1) or control plots (1.6 ±

0.2 mg L-1; t = 1.55, p = 0.16), and therefore any

potential Fe interference of treatment effects on

SUVA254 were minimal. In addition, DOC from the

heated plots decayed twice as fast as control plot DOC

control

R2 = 0.36

heated

R2 = 0.49

0.5

0.7

0.9

1.1

1.3

1.5

1.7

1.9

2.1

2.3

2.5

30 60 90 120

DOC (mg L -1)

DO

N (m

g L

-1)

control

heated

Fig. 4 The slope of the relationship between DON and DOC

declined with heating in analysis of covariance (F1,240 = 4.19,

p = 0.04). Coefficients describing the trends are b0 = 0.38 ±

0.09, b1 = 0.013 ± 0.001 for heated plots and b0 = 0.18 ±

0.13, b1 = 0.017 ± 0.002 for control plots

1:1

2.5

3.5

4.5

2.5 3.5 4.5

Mean SUVA254

in control plots

Mea

n S

UV

A25

4

in h

eate

d p

lots

25 cm

50 cm

Fig. 5 Mean daily porewater Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance

at 254 nm (SUVA254; L mg C-1 m-1) measurements were

lower in heated plots than in control plots across all depths and

sampling days (t = 2.76, p = 0.011). Error bars are standard

errors of the mean values

Table 2 Mixed-effects model of predictors of specific ultra-

violet absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254; L mg C-1 m-1)

Term Fixed

effects

F value

Degrees of

freedom

(num, den)

p

Depth 5.23 1, 143 0.0236

DOY 2.61 12, 143 0.0036

DOC:DON 29.18 1, 143 \.0001

Heated or control 5.05 1, 143 0.0261

Hummock or lawn 0 1, 143 0.9811

DOC:DON 9 DOY 2.71 12, 143 0.0025

DOC:DON 9 heated 4.47 1, 143 0.0362

Depth 9 heated 3.45 1, 143 0.0654

Biogeochemistry

123

within the first 3 weeks of a 2 month laboratory

incubation experiment, with exponential decay coef-

ficients for heated plot DOC being -1.8 9 10-3

± 8.4 9 10-4 compared to -8.0 9 10-4 ± 3.7 9

10-4 for the control plot DOC (Fig. 6). The exponen-

tial decay coefficients for DOC incubated for 56 days

were not different for porewater collected from the

heated (-8.6 9 10-4 ± 3.2 9 10-4) and control

plots (-9.2 9 10-4 ± 1.1 9 10-4).

Perhaps surprisingly, SUVA254 was negatively

related to the dissolved organic C:N ratio across all

samples (r = -0.47, p \ 0.001; see also Table 2).

Collectively, these results suggest that the higher DOC

concentrations present in the warming treatments were

relatively aliphatic in nature, while also being asso-

ciated with a higher dissolved C:N ratio.

Ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry revealed

that, within the pool of relatively small compounds

(*200–800 Da) that are able to deprotonate, there

were small differences in peat porewater composition

with heating. Compounds unique to the heated plots

had lower mean H:C ratios and higher DBE than

compounds unique to the control plots (Fig. 7).

Compounds unique to the heated plots (289 identified)

were generally more condensed and less oxidized than

compounds unique to the control plots (Fig. 8). 17 %

of the 1,545 biomolecular assignments made for the

warmed plot DOC were in the range of protein and

carbohydrate containing compounds (H:C [ 1.5,

O:C [ 0.3), whereas only 8 % of the 1,516 biomo-

lecular assignments fell within the range of amino-

sugars in the control plot DOC (Fig. 8). Porewater

y = 56.7e-0.0018x

R2 = 0.69

y = 49.6e-0.0008x

R2 = 0.70

47

50

53

56

59

0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63

day of incubation

DO

C o

f in

cub

ated

sam

ple

s (m

g L

-1 )

Fig. 6 Reduction in dissolved organic carbon over a 56 day

laboratory incubation. Each point is the mean DOC concentra-

tion of porewater from three heated (opaque diamonds) or three

control (squares) plots. Negative exponential relationships are

plotted for the first 21 days only. Error bars are standard errors

of the mean values (n = 3 plots)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

O:C H:C N:C DBE/10

Wei

ghte

d R

elat

ive

Abun

danc

e

Control, all Heated, allControl, unique Heated, unique

Fig. 7 Mean weighted relative abundances of O:C, H:C, N:C and

the DBE of all molecular formulas present in the sample, and of the

molecular formulas unique to a given sample. Data represent the

assigned molecular formulas of samples from two control plots

and two heated plots collected on the same day at 25 cm depth.

Error bars are standard errors of the mean values (n = 2)

Fig. 8 Van Krevelen diagram of porewater harvested from two

heated and two control plots. Points represent the composition of

molecular assignments unique to heated (gray) or control

(white) plots. Points depicted by a times symbol are molecular

assignments common in all pore water

Biogeochemistry

123

from the heated plots exhibited greater biomolecular

assignments associated with aromatic compounds,

with 35 % of the biomolecular assignments occurring

above the threshold for AI [ 0.5 (Koch and Dittmar

2006).

The three organic acids measured changed in

different ways with the heating treatment, though

responses were variable and not statistically significant.

Least-squares mean acetate concentrations decreased

from 0.32 to 0.16 mg L-1 with heating, but were not

significantly different (F1,244 = 1.80, p = 0.18). For-

mate (mean concentrations ranging from 0.10 mg L-1

in control plots to 0.12 mg L-1 in the heated plots) and

oxalate (mean concentrations ranging from 0.20 to

0.26 mg L-1, respectively) concentrations were also

unaffected by the heating treatment (F1,244 = 2.04,

p = 0.16, and F1,244 = 2.25, p = 0.14, respectively).

Least-squared mean acetate concentrations increased

with depth from 25 to 50 cm (0.06–0.42 mg L-1

respectively; F1,244 = 7.90, p = 0.005).

Enzyme activities

Porewater extracellular enzyme activities were

affected by heating treatment and also changed

seasonally (Table 3). Chitinase and glucosidase activ-

ities were significantly affected by warming, with

mean activities increasing by 58 and 138 %, respec-

tively (Table 3, p = 0.005 and p = 0.03, respec-

tively). Cellulase, acid phosphatase, and phenol

oxidase activities exhibited seasonal changes as might

be expected, but did not change in response to warming

(Table 3). Cellulase activity increased during leaf

senescence in both the heated and control treatments

(p = 0.002). Phosphatase and phenol oxidase activity

were higher during leaf out versus leaf senescence

in both treatments (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002,

respectively).

Discussion

Temperature effects on DOC concentrations

and composition

The increase in DOC concentrations with heating

observed in this experiment was expected because the

water-soluble products of decomposition and biogenic

DOC should both increase with warming, because

decomposition and microbial activity are temperature

dependent. We observed a strong seasonal effect on

DOC concentrations, which is consistent with many

studies reporting patterns of peat DOC concentrations

that track temperatures and plant and microbial activity

throughout the growing season (Dalva and Moore

1991; Heikkinen 1994; Tegen and Dorr 1996; Scott

et al. 1998; Tipping et al. 1999; Kalbitz et al. 2000).

The growing season of 2011 was considerably warmer

(1962, SDD) than 2010 (1919 SDD) or 2009 (1814

SDD); this was coincident with mean porewater DOC

concentrations that were*22 % higher across all plots

in 2011 than was measured in 2009–2010. This

seasonal increase in mean DOC concentrations

observed in the warm year is similar in magnitude to

the increase in DOC measured with active heating at

the peat surface. A unique aspect of this study was the

increase in DOC concentrations measured in response

to warming which was independent of temporal

variability. This effect is confirmed by the fact that

there were no differences in DOC concentrations

Table 3 Changes in porewater enzyme activities (25 cm depth) in late summer and following senescence in both control and heated

plots (±standard error of the mean)

Treatment Season Chitinase Glucosidase Cellulase Phosphatase Phenol oxidase Peroxidase

Control Leaf out 0.118 (0.009) 0.287 (0.087) 0.066 (0.001) 1.475 (0.270) 0.030 (0.002) 0.013 (0.003)

Senescent 0.140 (0.002) 0.123 (\ .001) 0.208 (0.011) 0.539 (0.131) 0.002 (0.001) 0.011 (0.002)

Heated Leaf out 0.186 (0.005) 0.593 (0.003) 0.079 (0.002) 1.879 (0.480) 0.017 (0.002) 0.018 (0.009)

Senescent 0.182 (0.025) 0.380 (0.137) 0.319 (0.044) 0.432 (0.087) 0.002 (0.001) 0.001 (0.001)

Differences (t, p; n = 8)

By treatment 4.28, 0.005 2.76, 0.03 0.76, 0.48 0.27, 0.80 0.73, 0.50 0.35, 0.74

By season 0.34, 0.75 1.42, 0.21 5.12, 0.002 4.53, 0.004 5.44, 0.002 1.90, 0.11

Units are in nmol h-1, except phenol oxidase and peroxidase, which are in lmol h-1. Significant differences by treatment or season

(a = 0.05) are in bold text

Biogeochemistry

123

between previously heated and control plots in 2011,

when there was no power being supplied to the infrared

lamps. Moreover, we began to see separation in deeper

porewater DOC concentrations with warming in the

second year of the heating treatment, even though

temperatures at 50 cm were not significantly altered by

the experiment. This, too, likely reflects an influence of

heating on vegetation, and resulting interactions with

root-associated microorganisms and root activity in

addition to the downward diffusion of porewater. In a

3 year passive warming experiment in an alpine fen

peatland, a structural equation modeling effort esti-

mated a 23 % increase in the weight of litter-layer

microbial community effects on water chemistry

(Jassey et al. 2012). Jassey et al. (2012) suggested that

by inhibiting higher trophic levels within the microbial

community, interactions between Sphagnum-derived

polyphenols and warmer temperatures could actually

increase nutrient levels and dissolved C release. We

note here that passive warming effects on DOC and

TDN concentrations in the alpine fen study were

variable, with warming only significantly increasing

DOC concentrations in the third year of temperature

manipulation, and with no effect on TDN. Neverthe-

less, these results generally agree with those presented

herein, and demonstrate that modest warming at the

peat surface can have significant direct effects on DOC

concentrations and complex indirect effects on micro-

bial activity and porewater character.

Humic substances released by plant roots and

microorganisms are of a relatively lower molecular

weight (more aliphatic) than are the water-soluble

products of decomposition, which are more comprised

of high molecular-weight (aromatic) compounds (Thur-

man 1985; McKnight and Aiken 1998). In this study,

the relative aromaticity of peat porewater declined in

the warmed plots relative to control (Table 2; Fig. 5),

but the character of the pool of biomolecules that were

able to deprotonate (*200–800 Da) did not change

appreciably with modest warming at the peat surface

(Fig. 7). Compounds unique to the heating treatment

had narrower H:C and O:C ratios than control plots

(Fig. 8), suggesting a more aromatic or condense

structured DOM (Hedges 1990). While these results

may appear to be at odds with the SUVA254 data, they

suggest that most of the change in bulk porewater

composition with heating occurred in the fraction of

compounds not well quantified with the ultra-high

resolution mass spectrometry in this study. Increases in

the concentrations of relatively labile low molecular

weight DOC are consistent with increased microbial

activity (as observed with hydrophilic acids; Bourbon-

niere 1989; Guggenberger et al. 1994). It is possible that

the changes in novel compounds present in the heated

plots relative to control reflect increasing amounts of

microbially derived humic acids or the diagenesis of

polysaccharides (oxygen-rich biochemicals)-these pro-

cesses would result in narrower H:C and O:C ratios

within the pool of relatively large molecular weight

DOM (see, for example, Visser 1983). Interpretation of

these data are not straightforward, however, because

larger biomolecules initially released from peatland

vegetation and mosses can be degraded into smaller

components fairly rapidly (Gonet and Debska 1998;

Strack et al. 2011; cf. Wickland et al. 2007); this is a

transformation which would likely be facilitated at

warmer temperatures. In this study, novel compounds in

the heated and control plots both generally had lower

DBE and there was a decrease in the appearance of

unsaturated and/or oxygenated compounds, which

could indicate that the unique compounds in both

treatments were more labile (Tfaily et al. 2013). One

consistency between the FT-ICR MS data and analysis

of mean porewater constituent concentrations within

the much larger dataset was that an increase in N:C ratio

in novel compounds generally corresponded with

higher DBE (Fig. 7). This finding is consistent with a

higher N:C generally occurring in the unheated control

plots (Fig. 4), which also had higher SUVA254. The

increase in N:C while also having higher aromaticity

could be indicative of amine complexation with

carboxylic groups or protein complexation with phe-

nolic OH groups (McManus et al. 1985; Spencer et al.

1988; Munster and de Haan 1998). It could be that with

increased breakdown of larger humic substances with

warming, or with an increase in the abundance of lower

molecular weight compounds, there is less complexa-

tion of proteinaceous compounds with DOM (lower

dissolved N:C). Future studies employing emerging

technologies in liquid chromatography and mass spec-

trometry (cf. Liu et al. 2011; Remucal et al. 2012), in

conjunction with field manipulation experiments, are

needed to fully appreciate exactly how the character of

DOM is likely to change in a warmer climate.

Notwithstanding, these findings suggest different mech-

anisms of DOM production and consumption within

different biomolecular size classes in response to

warming at the peat surface.

Biogeochemistry

123

In this study, warming resulted in an increase in

relatively aliphatic DOC, with no statistical increases

in DON (Table 1B; Fig. 4). In contrast, studies have

shown that the ratio of aliphatic to aromatic DOC is

generally higher in aquatic systems with more DON

relative to DOC (McKnight and Aiken 1998). Aro-

matic structures present in DOC would largely come

from the degradation of plant-derived lignin (and

possibly the products of burning), whereas aliphatic

DOC would largely come from microbes, algal

exudates, and root exudates in the rhizosphere

(Hatcher and Spiker 1988; McKnight and Aiken

1998; Benner 2003). The observed declines in aro-

matic DOC relative to DON with warming could

suggest that N-containing biomolecules were not

generally exuded within the rhizosphere, or that

soluble N was rapidly immobilized. Because of the

absence of lignin in microorganisms and the fact that

SUVA254 decreased with warming, these results

suggest that the increase in DOC with warming was

largely derived from plants and plant–microbe inter-

actions within the rhizosphere, and not from the

breakdown of organic matter. This is consistent with

previous research in boreal peatlands showing that

porewater DOC is quite reactive and is composed of

relatively modern C affected by rhizosphere pro-

cesses, particularly when sedges are abundant (Chan-

ton et al. 2008). Complementary research at this site

has shown increased gross ecosystem productivity

with warming on the hummock-dominated plots, with

no differences in ecosystem respiration (Johnson et al.

2013). Together, these findings suggest that the

increased DOC concentrations observed with warm-

ing were derived more from plants and plant–microbe

interactions within the rhizosphere than from the

accumulation of products from decomposition of

organic material.

Temperature effects on porewater enzyme activity

Extracellular enzyme activities of the porewater dif-

fered by warming treatment for chitinase and glucosi-

dase, and differed seasonally for cellulase, phosphatase

and phenol oxidase activities. This suggests that the

controls on enzymatic metabolism are dependent on

environmental conditions. Chitinase, a carbon and

nitrogen-acquiring enzyme, may have higher activity

in heated treatments due to a higher rate of nitrogen

cycling in heated plots. This has been demonstrated in

upland temperate forests (Melillo et al. 2011, Butler

et al. 2012). In Arctic tundra soils, temperature has been

shown to be the strongest driver of hydrolytic enzyme

activities, though low activities have been observed in

the summer- possibly owing to a tight nitrogen cycle

and nitrogen limitations for enzyme production (Wal-

lenstein et al. 2009). More chitinase enzymes may be

produced, or the efficiency of chitinase enzymes may

increase with warming. Fungi produce the majority of

chitinase enzymes, and it has been demonstrated that

fungal abundance increases with warming in tundra

ecosystems (Clemmensen et al. 2006). Allison and

Treseder (2008) found that warming with closed-toped

greenhouses in a boreal forest lead to a decline in fungal

abundance and chitinase activity, however their study

might have been confounded with drying of the organic

horizon caused by the impediment of precipitation due

to the structure of the greenhouses. This study used

infrared lamps, which did not block moisture inputs

from precipitation. In a survey of 32 diverse wetlands

from around the world, Kang et al. (2005) demonstrated

that chitinase (N-acetylglucosaminidase) activities

associated with solid-phase peat increased with mean

annual temperatures measured in the field. While the

increasing potential chitinase activities measured with

increasing temperatures presented by Kang et al. (2005)

were over a magnitude greater than those measured in

this study (confer with Table 3), the results indicate that

chitinase activities associated with both solid and

dissolved phases are likely to increase with modest

warming in peat soil.

Glucosidase activity was also higher in heated

treatments. This may be due to an increase in the

amount of substrate available in heated treatments, or

to changes in the amount or efficiency of glucosidase

enzymes in the porewater. Since relatively aliphatic

compounds and DOC concentrations both increased

with warming, it seems likely that the concentration of

polysaccharides broken down by glucosidase has

increased with warming. Moreover, there was no

measured increase in phenol oxidase activity with

warming, which could allow for an accumulation of

phenolics with warmer temperatures, barring any co-

occurring changes in water table position and

increased aeration (Freeman et al. 2001b). Taken

together, these data suggest increased hydrolytic

enzyme activity could contribute in part to higher

concentrations of DOC with a warmer climate, which

fits nicely with reports suggesting a temperature (and

Biogeochemistry

123

enzyme) mediated rising trend in DOC concentrations

in runoff is underway (Freeman et al. 2001a).

We observed seasonal changes in hydrolytic and

oxidative enzyme activity potentials. Phosphatase

activity was higher in the leaf out period versus the

senescent period, indicating that phosphorus-acquiring

enzymes either have more substrate available, or have

a higher abundance or specific activity earlier in the

season. Phenol oxidase activity was also higher during

leaf-out than at the end of the growing season. This

suggests that there is either higher abundance or

efficiency of phenol oxidase enzymes or that there is a

higher polyphenol concentration early versus late in

the growing season. Although it is unclear which

mechanism may be involved, it is possible that the type

of phenol oxidase enzymes changes seasonally, due to

the wide variety of enzymes that depolymerize poly-

phenols and the relative instability of oxidative

enzymes versus hydrolytic enzymes (Sinsabaugh

2010). A previous study in an alpine peatland has

shown increased peroxidase activity with passive

warming, which was three orders of magnitude higher

than phenol oxidase activity (Jassey et al. 2012). While

we did observe higher oxidative enzyme activity in

September than in October, we did not observe large

differences between phenol oxidase or peroxidase

enzyme activity potentials, and there was no signifi-

cant effect of heating on oxidative enzyme activity

potentials. We measured enzyme activity potentials in

peat pore water, and it is possible that oxidative

enzymes associated with the solid phase (particle-

associated extracellular enzymes, or humus-enzyme

complexes) are more sensitive to changes in environ-

mental conditions than are free floating extracellular

enzymes associated with dissolved organic matter

(Hoppe 1991; Munster and de Haan 1998). Cellulase

activity increased during leaf senescence versus leaf

out. This may be due to an increase in concentrations of

more complex polysaccharides as leaf litter accumu-

lates. It is also possible that there is a decrease in the

relative concentration of simple polysaccharides dur-

ing this period, as evidenced by a non-significant

decrease in glucosidase activity from leaf out to

senescence. More data is needed on the relative

abundances of the chemical species present in the

two seasons to allow us to draw further conclusions

about the impact of substrate concentrations on

porewater enzyme activities.

Conclusions

We observed increases in porewater DOC concen-

trations and a slight decline in porewater aromaticity

with modest warming at the peat surface over

2 years. We also observed increases in hydrolytic

enzyme activity potentials in response to warming.

Earlier work at this study site has shown increased

gross primary production, with little change in

ecosystem respiration with active warming at the

peat surface (Johnson et al. 2013) and the observed

changes in porewater character are consistent with

increases in vegetation production and increased

microbial activity in shallow peat. Moreover, we

observed increases in DON:DOC generally corre-

sponding with higher aromaticity in the unheated

control plots. This was also observed within the suite

of novel compounds measured in the heated plots,

which had higher N:C and DBE than the control

plots. However, all novel compounds had lower DBE

than did compounds common to both heated and

control plots. These data suggest a tight coupling of

climate effects on the peatland biosphere and pore-

water chemistry, with different consequences for the

production and diagenesis of relatively large and

small biomolecules. Collectively, these data support

other studies which indicate DOC concentrations are

likely to increase in organic soils with the predicted

warming likely to occur in the coming decades. With

continued warming in peatlands, an increase in

relatively labile DOC concentrations could contrib-

ute to dissolved exports of DOC in runoff, and would

likely contribute to the pool of efficient electron

donors (and acceptors) in the production of CO2 and

CH4 in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Future

work examining how DOC export is likely to change

in a warmer climate, either by mineralization or in

runoff, is necessary to understand the consequences

of any temperature mediated increases in DOC

concentrations in soil.

Acknowledgments This research was supported by the U.S.

Department of Energy’s Office of Science (BER) through the

Midwestern Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic

Change Research at Michigan Technological University as well

as the Michigan Technological University Ecosystem Science

Center. We would like to thank Justina Silva and Jennifer

Eikenberry for help with laboratory analysis, and Arvo Aljaste

and Kristen Schmitt for help with field work. We appreciate the

constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers.

Biogeochemistry

123

References

Aitkenhead JA, McDowell WH (2000) Soil C: N ratio as a

predictor of annual riverine DOC flux at local and global

scales. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14(1):127–138

Albert DA, Wilcox DA, Ingram JW, Thompson TA (2005)

Hydrogeomorphic classification for Great Lakes coastal

wetlands. J Great Lakes Res 31:129–146

Alewell C, Paul S, Storck FR (2008) Co-regulation of redox

processes in freshwater wetlands as a function of organic

matter availability? Sci Total Environ 404:335–342

Allison SD, Treseder KK (2008) Warming and drying suppress

microbial activity and carbon cycling in boreal forest soils.

Glob Chang Biol 14:2898–2909

Alvarez-Cobelas M, Angeler DG, Sanchez-Carrillo S, Almendros

G (2012) A worldwide view of organic carbon export from

catchments. Biogeochemistry 107(1–3):275–293

Battin TJ, Luyssaert S, Kaplan LA, Aufdenkampe AK, Richter

A, Tranvik LJ (2009) The boundless carbon cycle. Nat

Geosci 2:598–600

Benner R (2003) Molecular indicators of the bioavailability of

dissolved organic matter. In: Findlay SEG, Sinsabaugh RL

(eds) Aquatic ecosystems: interactivity of dissolved

organic matter. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 121–135

Blakney GT, Robinson DE, Ly NV, Kelleher NL, Hendrickson

CL, Marshall AG (2005) Predator: PCI data station for FT-

ICR mass spectrometry. 53rd American Society of Mass

Spectrometry Annual Conference on Mass Spectrometry &

Allied Topics, San Antonio

Blodau C, Basiliko N, Moore TR (2004) Carbon turnover in

peatland mesocosms exposed to different water table lev-

els. Biogeochemistry 67(3):331–351

Boisvert E (2009) Initiation and development of three lake

superior costal peatlands. MS Thesis, Michigan Techno-

logical University, Houghton, p 77

Borken W, Ahrens B, Schulz C, Zimmermann L (2011) Site-to-

site variability and temporal trends of DOC concentrations

and fluxes in temperate forest soils. Glob Chang Biol

17(7):2428–2443

Bourbonniere RA (1989) Distribution patterns of dissolved

organic matter fractions in natural waters from eastern

Canada. Org Geochem 14:97–107

Bukaveckas PA, Robbins-Forbes M (2000) Role of dissolved

organic matter in the attenuation of photosynthetically

active and ultraviolet radiation in Adirondack lakes.

Freshw Biol 43:339–354

Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Strom-

berger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A

(2013) Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current

knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem

58:216–234

Butler SM, Melillo JM, Johnson JE, Mohan J, Steudler PA, Lux

H, Burrows E, Smith RM, Vario CL, Scott L, Hill TD,

Aponte N, Bowles F (2012) Soil warming alters nitrogen

cycling in a New England forest: implications for ecosys-

tem function and structure. Oecologia 168:819–828

Caldwell B (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil

biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49:637–644

Chanton JP, Glaser PH, Chasar LS, Brudige DJ, Hines ME,

Siegel DI, Tremblay LB, Cooper WT (2008) Radiocarbon

evidence for the importance of surface vegetation on fer-

mentation and methanogenesis in contrasting types of

boreal peatlands. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB4022.

doi:10.1029/2008GB003274

Christ MJ, David MB (1996) Temperature and moisture effects

on the production of dissolved organic carbon in a Spod-

osol. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1191–1199

Clark JM, Ashley D, Wagner M, Chapman PJ, Lane SN, Evans

CD, Heathwaite AL (2009) Increased temperature sensi-

tivity of net DOC production from ombrotrophic peat due

to water table draw-down. Glob Chang Biol 15:794–807

Clark JM, Bottrell SH, Evans CD, Monteith DT, Bartlett R, Rose

R, Newton RJ, Chapman PJ (2010) The importance of the

relationship between scale and process in understanding

long-term DOC dynamics. Sci Total Environ. doi:10.1016/

j.scitotenv.2010.02.046

Clemmensen KE, Michelsen A, Jonasson S, Shaver GR (2006)

Increased ectomycorrhizal fungal abundance after long-

term fertilization and warming of two arctic tundra eco-

systems. New Phytol 171:391–404

Cody RP, Smith JK (1997) Applied statistics and the SAS

programming language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

Dalva M, Moore TR (1991) Sources and sinks of dissolved

organic carbon in a forested swamp catchment. Biogeo-

chemistry 15:1–19

Driscoll CT, Driscoll KM, Roy KM, Mitchell MJ (2003)

Chemical response of lakes in the Adirondack region of

New York to declines in acidic deposition. Environ Sci

Technol 37:2036–2042

Evans CD, Monteith DT, Cooper DM (2005) Long-term

increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon:

observations, possible causes and environmental impacts.

Environ Pollut 137:55–71

Evans CD, Jones TG, Burden A, Ostle N, Zielinski P, Cooper

MDA, Peacock M, Clark JM, Oulehle F, Cooper D, Free-

man C (2012) Acidity controls on dissolved organic carbon

mobility in organic soils. Glob Chang Biol 18:3317–3331

Fenner N, Freeman C, Lock MA, Harmens H, Reynolds B,

Sparks T (2007) Interactions between elevated CO2 and

warming could amplify DOC exports from peatland

catchments. Environ Sci Technol 41:3146–3152

Freeman C, Evans CD, Monteith DT (2001a) Export of organic

carbon from peat soils. Nature 412:785

Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H (2001b) An enzymic ‘latch’ on a

global carbon store. Nature 409:149–150

Freeman C, Fenner N, Ostle NJ, Kang H, Dowrick DJ, Reynolds

B, Lock MA, Sleep D, Hughes S, Hudson J (2004) Export

of dissolved organic carbon from peatlands under elevated

carbon dioxide levels. Nature 430:195–198

German DP, Weintraub MN, Grandy AS, Lauber CL, Rinkes

ZL, Allison SD (2011) Optimization of hydrolytic and

oxidative enzyme methods for ecosystem studies. Soil Biol

Biochem 43(7):1387–1397

Gonet SS, Debska B (1998) Properties of humic acids developed

during humification process of post-harvest plant residues.

Environ Int 24:603–608

Guggenberger G, Zech W, Schulten H (1994) Formation and

mobilization of dissolved organic matter: evidence form

chemical structural studies of organic matter fractions in

acid forest floor solutions. Org Geochem 21:51–66

Biogeochemistry

123

Hatcher PG, Spiker EC (1988) Selective degradation of plant

biomolecules. In: Frimmel FH, Christman RF (eds) Humic

substances and their role in the environment. Wiley, New

York, pp 59–74

Hedges JI (1990) Compositional indicators of organic acid

sources and reactions in natural environments. In: Perdue

EM, Gjessing ET (eds) Organic acids in aquatic ecosys-

tems. Wiley, New York, pp 43–64

Heikkinen K (1994) Organic matter, iron and nutrient transport

and nature of dissolved organic matter in the drainage basin

of a boreal humic river in northern Finland. Sci Total

Environ 152:81–89

Heitmann T, Goldhammer T, Beer J, Blodau C (2007) Electron

transfer of dissolved organic matter and its potential sig-

nificance for anaerobic respiration in a northern bog. Glob

Chang Biol 13:1771–1785

Hessen DO (1992) Dissolved organic carbon in a small humic

lake: effects on bacterial production and respiration.

Hydrobiologia 229:115–123

Holl BS, Fiedler S, Jungkunst HF, Kalbitz K, Freibauer A,

Drosler M, Stahr K (2009) Characteristics of dissolved

organic matter following 20 years of peatland restoration.

Sci Total Environ 408:78–83

Hoppe HG (1991) Microbial extracellular enzyme activity: a

new key parameter in aquatic ecology. In: Chrost RJ (ed)

Microbial enzymes in aquatic environments. Springer,

Berlin, pp 60–83

Hughey CA, Hendrickson CL, Rodgers RP, Marshall AG, Qian

KN (2001) Kendrick mass defect spectrum: a compact

visual analysis for ultrahigh-resolution broadband mass

spectra. Anal Chem 73(19):4676–4681

Jassey VEJ, Chiapusio G, Gilbert D, Toussaint ML, Binet P

(2012) Phenoloxidase and peroxidase activities in Sphag-

num-dominated peatland in a warming climate. Soil Biol

Biochem 46:49–52

Jassey VEJ, Chiapusio G, Binet P, Buttler A, Laggoun-Defarge F,

Delarue F, Bernard N, Mitchell EAD, Toussaint ML, Fran-

cez AJ, Gilbert D (2013) Above- and belowground linkages

in Sphagnum peatland: climate warming affects plant–

microbial interactions. Glob Chang Biol 19(3):811–823

Joanisse GD, Bradley RL, Preston CM, Munson AD (2007) Soil

enzyme inhibition by condensed litter tannins may drive

ecosystem structure and processes: the case of Kalmia

angustifolia. New Phytol 175:535–546

Johansson EM, Fransson PMA, Finlay RD, van Hees PAW

(2009) Quantitative analysis of soluble exudates produced

by ectomycorrhizal roots as a response to ambient and

elevated CO2. Soil Biol Biochem 41(6):1111–1116

Johnson CP, Pypker TG, Hribljan JA, Chimner RA (2013) Open

top chambers and infrared lamps: a comparison of heating

efficacy and CO2/CH4 dynamics in a Northern Michigan

Peatland. Ecosystems 16(5):736–748

Judd KE, Kling GW (2002) Production and export of dissolved

C in arctic tundra mesocosms: the roles of vegetation and

water flow. Biogeochemistry 60(3):213–234

Kalbitz K, Solinger S, Park JH, Michalzik B, Matzner E (2000)

Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in

soils: a review. Soil Sci 165(4):277–304

Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E (2003) Bio-

degradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as

related to its properties. Geoderma 113(3–4):273–291

Kane ES, Valentine DW, Michaelson GJ, Fox JD, Ping C-L

(2006) Controls over pathways of carbon efflux from soils

along climate and black spruce productivity gradients in

interior Alaska. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1438–1450

Kane ES, Turetsky MR, Harden JW, McGuire AD, Waddington

JM (2010) Seasonal ice and hydrologic controls on dis-

solved organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations in a

boreal-rich fen. J Geophys Res 115:G04012. doi:10.1029/

2010JG001366

Kang H, Freeman C, Park SS, Chun J (2005) N-Acetylgluco-

saminidase activities in wetlands: a global survey. Hyd-

robiologia 532:103–110

Keller JK, Weisenhorn PB, Megonigal JP (2009) Humic acids as

electron acceptors in wetland decomposition. Soil Biol

Biochem 41:1518–1522

Koch BP, Dittmar T (2006) From mass to structure: an aroma-

ticity index for high-resolution mass data of natural organic

matter. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:926–932

Koch BP, Witt MR, Engbrodt R, Dittmar T, Kattner G (2005)

Molecular formulae of marine and terrigenous dissolved

organic matter detected by electrospray ionization Fourier

transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69(13):3299–3308

Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E (2007) Temperature sensi-

tivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and

potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils.

Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21(4):GB4017

Kolka RK, Grigal DF, Nater EA, Verry ES (2001) Hydrologic

cycling of mercury and organic carbon in a forested

upland-bog watershed. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:897–905

Kujawinski EB (2002) Electrospray ionization Fourier trans-

form ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI FT-

ICR MS): characterization of complex environmental

mixtures. Environ Forensics 3(3–4):207–216

Kullberg A, Bishop KH, Hargeby A, Jansson M, Petersen RC

(1993) The ecological significance of dissolved organic-

carbon in acidified waters. Ambio 22:331–337

Kuzyakov Y (2002) Review: factors affecting rhizosphere

priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–396

Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WA, Wolfinger RD, Scha-

benberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS

Institute Inc, Cary

Liu Z, Sleighter RL, Zhong J, Hatcher PG (2011) The chemical

changes of DOM from black waters to coastal marine

waters by HPLC combined with ultrahigh resolution mass

spectrometry. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92:205–216

Mazzoleni LR, Ehrmann BM, Shen XH, Marshall AG, Collett

JL (2010) Water-soluble atmospheric organic matter in

fog: exact masses and chemical formula identification by

ultrahigh-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron reso-

nance mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 44(10):

3690–3697

McDowell WH, Likens G (1988) Origin, composition, and flux

of dissolved organic carbon in the Hubbard Brook valley.

Ecol Monogr 58:177–195

McKnight DM, Aiken GR (1998) Sources and age of aquatic

humus. In: Hessen DO, Tranvik LJ (eds) Aquatic humic

substances—ecology and biogeochemistry. Ecological

studies 133. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–40

McManus JP, Davis KG, Beart JE, Gaffey SH, Lilley TH, Ha-

slam E (1985) Polyphenol interactions. Part 1.

Biogeochemistry

123

Introduction. Some observations on the reversible com-

plexation of polyphenols with proteins and polysaccha-

rides. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans II 2(9):1429–1438

Melillo J, Butler S, Johnson J, Mohan J, Steudler P, Lux H,

Burrows E, Bowles F, Smith R, Scott L, Vario C, Hill T,

Burton A, Zhou Y, Tang J (2011) Soil warming, carbon–

nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets. Proc Natl

Acad Sci USA 8(23):9508–9512

Michaelson GJ, Ping C-L, Kling GW, Hobbie JE (1998) The

character and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter at

thaw and in spring runoff waters of the arctic tundra north

slope. J Geophys Res 103:28939–28946

Michalzik B, Kalbitz K, Park JH, Solinger S, Matzner E (2001)

Fluxes and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and

nitrogen—a synthesis for temperate forests. Biogeochem-

istry 52:173–205

Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, de Wit HA, Forsius M,

Hogasen T, Wilander A, Skjelkvale BL, Jeffries DS, Vu-

orenmaa J, Keller B, Kopacek J, Vesely J (2007) Dissolved

organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmo-

spheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450:537–540

Moore TR (2003). Dissolved organic carbon in a northern boreal

landscape. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17, 109. doi:10.1029/

2003GB002050

Moore TR, Dalva M (2001) Some controls on the release of

dissolved organic carbon by plant tissues and soils. Soil Sci

166(1):38–47

Moore TR, Pare D, Boutin R (2008) Production of dissolved organic

carbon in Canadian forest soils. Ecosystems 11:740–751

Muller-Wegener U (1988) Interaction of humic substances with

biota. In: Frimmel FH, Christman RF (eds) Humic sub-

stances and their role in the environment. Wiley, New

York, pp 179–192

Munster U, de Haan H (1998) The role of microbial extracellular

enzymes in the transformation of dissolved organic matter

in humic waters. In: Hessen DO, Tranvik LJ (eds) Aquatic

humic substances—ecology and biogeochemistry. Eco-

logical studies 133. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–258

Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities

and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In:

Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment.

Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–34

Neff JC, Hooper DU (2002) Vegetation and climate controls on

potential CO2, DOC and DON production in northern lat-

itude soils. Glob Chang Biol 8:872–884

Park JH, Kalbitz K, Matzner E (2002) Resource control on the

production of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in a

deciduous forest floor. Soil Biol Biochem 34(6):813–822

Pastor J, Solin J, Bridgham SD, Updegraff K, Harth C, Wei-

shampel P, Dewey B (2003) Global warming and the

export of dissolved organic carbon from boreal peatlands.

Oikos 100(2):380–386

Porcal P, Koprivnjak J-F, Molot LA, Dillon PJ (2009) Humic

substances—part 7: the biogeochemistry of dissolved

organic carbon and its interactions with climate change.

Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:714–726

Preston MD, Eimers MC, Watmough SA (2011) Effect of

moisture and temperature variation on DOC release from a

peatland: conflicting results from laboratory, field and

historical data analysis. Sci Total Environ. doi:10.1016/j.

scitotenv.2010.12.027

Putman AL, Offenberg JH, Fisseha R, Kundu S, Rahn TA,

Mazzoleni LR (2012) Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass

spectrometry characterization of a-pinene ozonolysis SOA.

Atmos Environ Part A 46(1):164–172

Rapalee G, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA, Harden JW, Veldhuis

H (1998) Soil carbon stocks and their rates of accumulation

and loss in a boreal forest landscape. Glob Biogeochem

Cycles 12(4):687–701

Remucal CK, Cory RM, Sander M, McNeill K (2012) Low

molecular weight components in an aquatic humic sub-

stance as characterized by membrane dialysis Orbitrap

mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 46:9350–9359

Roulet N, Moore TR (2006) Environmental chemistry—

browning the waters. Nature 444(7117):283–284

Scott MJ, Jones MN, Woof C, Tipping E (1998) Concentrations

and fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in drainage water

from an upland peat system. Environ Int 24:537–546

Shackle VJ, Freeman C, Reynolds B (2000) Carbon supply and

the regulation of enzyme activity in constructed wetlands.

Soil Biol Biochem 32:1935–1940

Sinsabaugh RL (2010) Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic

matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 42:391–404

Sinsabaugh RL, Reynolds H, Long TM (2000) Rapid assay for

amidohydrolase (urease) activity in environmental sam-

ples. Soil Biol Biochem 32:2095–2097

Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo ME,LauberC, Waldrop MP, ZakDR (2005)

Extracellular enzyme activities and soil organic matter

dynamics for northern hardwood forests receiving simulated

nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry 75(2):201–215

Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison

SD, Creshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo

ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL,

Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP,

Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry

of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:

1252–1264

Spencer CM, Cai Y, Martin R, Gaffney SH, Goulding PN,

Magnolato D, Lilley TH, Haslam E (1988) Polyphenol

complexation—some thoughts and observations. Phyto-

chemistry 27:2397–2409

Stenson AC, Marshall AG, Cooper WT (2003) Exact masses and

chemical formulas of individual Suwannee River fulvic

acids from ultrahigh resolution electrospray ionization

Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectra.

Anal Chem 75(6):1275–1284

Strack M, Waddington JM, Bourbonniere RA, Buckton EL,

Shaw K, Whittington P, Price JP (2008) Effect of water

table drawdown on peatland dissolved organic carbon

export and dynamics. Hydrol Process 22:3373–3385

Strack M, Toth K, Bourbonniere R, Waddington JM (2011)

Dissolved organic carbon production and runoff quality

following peatland extraction and restoration. Ecol Eng

37:1998–2008

Sucker C, Krause K (2010) Increasing dissolved organic carbon

concentrations in freshwaters: what is the actual driver?

iForest 3:106–108

Tegen I, Dorr H (1996) Mobilization of cesium in organic rich

soils: correlation with production of dissolved organic

carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 88:133–144

Tfaily MM, Hamdan R, Corbett JE, Chanton JP, Glaser PH,

Cooper WT (2013) Investigating dissolved organic matter

Biogeochemistry

123

decomposition in northern peatlands using complimentary

analytical techniques. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

112:116–129

Thurman EM (1985) Organic geochemistry of natural waters.

Nijhoff/Junk, Boston

Tipping E, Woof C, Rigg E, Harrison AF, Inneson P, Taylor K,

Benham D, Poskitt J, Rowland AP, Bol R, Harkness DD

(1999) Climatic influences on the leaching of dissolved

organic matter from upland UK moorland soils, investi-

gated by a field manipulation experiment. Environ Int

25:83–95

Tranvik LJ, Jansson M (2002) Climate change—terrestrial

export of organic carbon. Nature 415(6874):861–862

Urban NR, Gorham E, Underwood JK, Martin FB, Ogden JG

(1990) Chemical processes controlling concentrations of

Al, Fe, and Mn in Nova Scotia lakes. Limnol Oceanogr

35(7):1516–1534

Urban N, Verry ES, Eisenreich S, Grigal DF, Sebestyen SD

(2011) Element cycling in upland/peatland watersheds. In:

Kolka RK, Sebestyen SD, Verry ES, Brooks KN (eds)

Peatland biogeochemistry and watershed hydrology at the

marcell experimental forest. CRC Press, Boca Raton,

pp 213–243

Visser SA (1983) Application of Van Krevelen’s graphical–

statistical method for the study of aquatic humic material.

Environ Sci Technol 17:412–417

Wallenstein MD, McMahon SK, Schimel JP (2009) Seasonal

variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities

in Arctic tundra soils. Glob Chang Biol 15:1631–1639

Wallenstein M, Allison SD, Ernakovich J, Steinweg JM, Sin-

sabaugh RL (2011) Controls on the temperature sensitivity

of soil enzymes: a key driver of in situ enzyme activity

rates. In: Shukla G, Varma A (eds) Soil enzymology.

Springer, Berlin, pp 245–258

Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Bergamaschi BA, Fram MS, Fujii R,

Mopper K (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absor-

bance as an indicator of the chemical composition and

reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Tech-

nol 37(20):4702–4708

Wickland KP, Neff JC, Aiken GR (2007) Dissolved organic

carbon in Alaskan boreal forest: sources, chemical charac-

teristics, and biodegradability. Ecosystems 10:1323–1340

Worrall F, Burt T, Shedden R (2003) Long term records of

riverine dissolved organic matter. Biogeochemistry

64:165–178

Yallop AR, Clutterbuck B, Thacker J (2010) Increases in humic

dissolved organic carbon export from upland peat catch-

ments: the role of temperature, declining sulphur deposi-

tion and changes in land management. Clim Res. doi:10.

3354/cr00884

Biogeochemistry

123