Stop Land Subsidence in Peat Meadow Areas - Raad voor de ...
Dissolved organic carbon in peat porewater increases with warming: a field manipulation experiment...
Transcript of Dissolved organic carbon in peat porewater increases with warming: a field manipulation experiment...
Peat porewater dissolved organic carbon concentrationand lability increase with warming: a field temperaturemanipulation experiment in a poor-fen
Evan S. Kane • Lynn R. Mazzoleni • Carley J. Kratz • John A. Hribljan •
Christopher P. Johnson • Thomas G. Pypker • Rodney Chimner
Received: 8 October 2013 / Accepted: 9 January 2014
� Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
Abstract Studies conducted across northern Europe
and North America have shown increases in dissolved
organic carbon (DOC) in aquatic systems in recent
decades. While there is little consensus as to the exact
mechanisms for the increases in DOC, hypotheses
converge on such climate change factors as warming,
increased precipitation variability, and changes in
atmospheric deposition. In this study, we tested the
effects of warming on peat porewater composition by
actively warming a peatland with infrared lamps
mounted 1.24 m above the peat surface for 3 years.
Mean growing season peat temperatures in the warmed
plots (n = 5) were 1.9 ± 0.4 �C warmer than the
control plots at 5 cm depth (t statistic = 5.03,
p = 0.007). Mean porewater DOC concentrations
measured throughout the growing season were 15 %
higher in the warmed plots (73.4 ± 3.2 mg L-1) than in
the control plots (63.7 ± 2.1 mg L-1) at 25 cm
(t = 4.69, p \ 0.001). Furthermore, DOC from the
warmed plots decayed nearly twice as fast as control plot
DOC in laboratory incubations, and exhibited lower
aromaticity than control plot porewater (reduction in
SUVA254 in heated plots compared with control plots).
Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) concentrations
Responsible Editor: Jan Mulder
E. S. Kane
U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station,
Houghton, MI 49931, USA
E. S. Kane (&) � C. J. Kratz � J. A. Hribljan �C. P. Johnson � T. G. Pypker � R. Chimner
School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science,
Michigan Technological University, Houghton,
MI 49931, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
C. J. Kratz
e-mail: [email protected]
J. A. Hribljan
e-mail: [email protected]
C. P. Johnson
e-mail: [email protected]
T. G. Pypker
e-mail: [email protected]
R. Chimner
e-mail: [email protected]
L. R. Mazzoleni
Department of Chemistry, Michigan Technological
University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
Present Address:
C. P. Johnson
Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of
Wisconsin-Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison,
WI 53706, USA
Present Address:
T. G. Pypker
Department of Natural Resources, Thompson Rivers
University, Kamloops, BC V2C OC8, Canada
123
Biogeochemistry
DOI 10.1007/s10533-014-9955-4
tracked DOC patterns as expected, but the amount of
dissolved N per unit C decreased with warming.
Previous work has shown that warming increased net
primary production at this site, and together with
measured increases in the activities of chitinases and
glucosidases we suggest that the increased DOC
concentrations observed with warming were derived
in part from microbial-plant interactions in the rhizo-
sphere. We also detected more nitrogen containing
compounds with higher double bond equivalents (DBE)
unique to the warmed plots, within the pool of
biomolecules able to deprotonate (16 % of all com-
pounds identified using ultrahigh resolution ion elec-
trospray mass spectrometry); we suggest these
compounds could be the products of increased plant,
microbial, and enzyme activity occurring with warming.
With continued warming in peatlands, an increase in
relatively labile DOC concentrations could contribute to
dissolved exports of DOC in runoff, and would likely
contribute to the pool of efficient electron donors (and
acceptors) in the production of CO2 and CH4 in
terrestrial and aquatic environments.
Keywords Peat � Climate change �Extracellular enzyme � Dissolved organic
nitrogen � Dissolved organic carbon � Ericaceae �Sedge
Introduction
Long-term studies of northern peatlands and brown-
water fed freshwater bodies of Europe and North
America have revealed increasing concentrations of
dissolved organic carbon (DOC) over the last two
decades (Freeman et al. 2001a; Driscoll et al. 2003;
Worrall et al. 2003; Freeman et al. 2004; Evans et al.
2005; Yallop et al. 2010; Urban et al. 2011). In carbon
rich ecosystems such as northern peatlands, DOC
pools are significant (Battin et al. 2009) and fluxes of
DOC can be similar in magnitude to that of long-term
C accrual in dead organic matter (Moore 2003; cf.
Rapalee et al. 1998). Not only are DOC pools and
fluxes important to consider with respect to carbon
cycling, but changes in DOC concentrations affect
critical ecosystem properties in aquatic environments,
such as pH (Kullberg et al. 1993), light attenuation
(Bukaveckas and Robbins-Forbes 2000), mineral
complexation and the mobility of heavy metals (Urban
et al. 1990; Kolka et al. 2001), peat porewater
electrochemistry and microbial activity (Heitmann
et al. 2007; Alewell et al. 2008; Keller et al. 2009) and
foodweb structure (Hessen 1992). It is therefore
important to understand the direct mechanisms driving
the observed increases in DOC concentrations.
To date there is still uncertainty associated with
identifying the primary drivers of observed increases
in DOC concentrations in a wide range of ecosystems
(Sucker and Krause 2010; Clark et al. 2010; Preston
et al. 2011). Debate surrounding the isolation of single
mechanisms responsible has focused on factors related
to climate change, notably increasing temperatures
(Freeman et al. 2001a), changes in atmospheric
deposition (Monteith et al. 2007; Clark et al. 2010;
Evans et al. 2012), altered precipitation or drainage
patterns (Strack et al. 2008; Holl et al. 2009; Kane
et al. 2010), and increased atmospheric CO2 concen-
tration (Freeman et al. 2004; Fenner et al. 2007;
Johansson et al. 2009). At the heart of uncertainty
concerning a direct mechanism for increasing DOC
concentrations in streams (considered as an export
from the terrestrial system) is distinguishing between
changes in soil DOC concentrations versus changes in
runoff patterns and hydrologic connectivity (Tranvik
and Jansson 2002; Roulet and Moore 2006). As such,
studies involving landscape temperature gradients
(Kane et al. 2006; Borken et al. 2011) or mesocosms
(Judd and Kling 2002; Blodau et al. 2004) report
increased soil DOC concentrations with warming, but
consensus as to the direct effects of temperature on
DOC concentrations in runoff are mixed (Pastor et al.
2003; Porcal et al. 2009; Clark et al. 2009; Preston
et al. 2011). Notwithstanding, peatlands (or Histosols)
in particular have been shown to be strong sources of
DOC export in comparisons across diverse catchment
types (Aitkenhead and McDowell 2000; Alvarez-
Cobelas et al. 2012). Improved understanding of the
underlying mechanisms of changes in DOC concen-
trations in peatlands is necessary to understand
observed changes in DOC export and to predict future
changes in DOC.
The concentration of peat porewater DOC is largely
dependent on the relativity between DOC production
and consumption in the soil matrix, and both of these
processes are likely to increase with temperature in
northern organic soils. DOC production increases with
temperature-mediated increases in plant production,
owing to root exudates (Kuzyakov 2002; Freeman
Biogeochemistry
123
et al. 2004) and changes in the types and activities of
extracellular enzymes exuded (Fenner et al. 2007) and
increased inputs and leaching of plant litter and soils
(McDowell and Likens 1988; Moore and Dalva 2001;
Park et al. 2002). DOC production also increases as the
turnover of dead organic matter increases (which
increases with temperature), as the water-soluble
products of decomposition accumulate (Kalbitz et al.
2000; Michalzik et al. 2001). DOC mineralization can
also increase with temperature (Moore et al. 2008),
with rates of change being dependent on structural
characteristics of the DOC (Christ and David 1996;
Michaelson et al. 1998; Wickland et al. 2007). Since
DOC is produced by microbes while also being a labile
substrate for microbial activity (McKnight and Aiken
1998), production and consumption relationships of
DOC are hard to disentangle (Muller-Wegener 1988;
Neff and Hooper 2002; Kalbitz et al. 2003). Field
manipulation studies with controls over variables
which co-vary with temperature are necessary to test
specific mechanisms for the observed increases in
DOC concentrations with warming (cf. Jassey et al.
2013).
Accumulation of the water-soluble products of
decaying organic matter in response to warmer tem-
peratures is also affected by enzyme production and
biophysical limitations to the microbial decay of DOC.
Microbial acquisition of nutrients is primarily exe-
cuted through the release of extracellular enzymes.
These enzymes depolymerize organic matter hydro-
lytically (Sinsabaugh et al. 2008) and oxidatively
(Sinsabaugh 2010) to release soluble components
which can be assimilated by microorganisms (see
reviews by Munster and de Haan 1998; Nannipieri
et al. 2002; Caldwell 2005; Burns et al. 2013). Exactly
how sensitive enzyme activities are to changes in
temperatures can be described using the first principles
of thermodynamics, with the sensitivity of organic
matter degradation being directly related to the acti-
vation energy of a particular enzyme (Wallenstein et al.
2011). This is an important additional consideration in
northern organic soils because the temperature sensi-
tivities of enzyme activity are generally higher in
colder environments (Koch et al. 2007). For example,
Wallenstein et al. (2009) found that temperature
explained 72 % of the variation in modeled hydrolytic
enzyme activity (b-glucosidase) in tundra soil. More-
over, Jassey et al. (2012) recently demonstrated that
oxidative enzyme activity (peroxidase) increased by
over 30 % with passive warming in a Sphagnum
peatland. To date the direct effects of enzyme activity
on DOC concentrations in peatland ecosystems have
largely assumed DOC accumulates when enzyme
function is inhibited, such as by complexation with
organic molecules (Joanisse et al. 2007) or with the
presence of oxygen (Freeman et al. 2001b, 2004).
Relationships between DOC and extracellular enzyme
activities are not straightforward, and there may be
positive feedbacks wherein labile DOC promotes
hydrolytic enzyme production, which in turn increases
the quantity of DOC (Shackle et al. 2000). However,
there is almost no work investigating in situ temper-
ature effects on hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme
function, and how these factors in turn effect DOC
concentrations in northern peatlands.
To examine the direct effects of warming on peat
porewater composition, we actively heated the soil
surface of a poor fen peatland ecosystem in northern
Michigan, USA for three growing seasons (Johnson
et al. 2013). We used a combination of spectral
indexes, porewater incubation studies (for mineraliza-
tion and enzymatic activities), ion chromatography,
and ultra-high resolution electrospray ionization mass
spectrometry to test our hypotheses. We hypothesized
that DOC inputs to porewater derived in part from
microbial/plant interactions in the rhizosphere would
outstrip losses from DOC mineralization in the heated
plots, leading to an increase in porewater DOC quantity
and quality (or lability) with warmer temperatures. We
expected higher activities of both hydrolytic and
oxidative enzymes with warming, which would also
increase DOC concentrations through the cycling of
phenolic compounds. Alternatively, warming could
cause a reduction in the solubility of oxygen, which
would lead to a decrease in phenol-oxidase activity.
We hypothesized that microtopography (hummock vs.
hollow or lawns) would be a significant arbiter of
temperature effects on DOC concentrations, owing to
changes in thermal conductivity and relative water
table position with change in peat microtopography.
Methods and materials
Study site and instrumentation
The study site is located in a poor fen peatland on the coast
of Lake Superior in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan,
Biogeochemistry
123
USA near the town of Pequaming (46.85�N 88.37�W,
Elev. 183 m). The peatland initiated *2,225 years ago
on a tombolo in Lake Superior and has 290 cm of sedge
and Sphagnum peat overlying sandy mineral soil (Bois-
vert 2009). The peatland is categorized as a barrier beach
lagoon-tombolo (Albert et al. 2005). Hummock and lawn
microtopography is prevalent, with vegetation typical of
poor fens in the region (trees: Picea mariana and Larix
laricina; shrubs: Chamaedaphne calyculata, Ledum
groenlandicum, Kalmia polifolia, Andromeda glauco-
phylla, Myrica gale, Vaccinium oxycoccos; herbs: Dro-
sera rotundifolia, Sarracenia purpurea; sedges: Carex
oligosperma, C. exilis, C. utriculata; mosses: Sphagnum
fuscum, S. rubellum, S. magellanicum, S. papillosum).
The average annual temperature and total precipitation
for the region are 4.5 �C and 833 mm, respectively.
Our study consisted of 10, 2 m by 1 m plots that
were divided equally between hummocks and lawns.
Plot locations were chosen based on available micro-
topography and were randomly subdivided into heated
or control treatments. The heating treatments consisted
of infrared lamps (MRM-1215, Kalglo Electronics
Company Ltd., Bethlehem, PA, USA; 1,500 W,
165 cm long) positioned 124 cm above the peat
surface on steel conduit that was anchored into the
underlying sandy substrate, as described in detail by
Johnson et al. (2013). Elevated boardwalks and planks
were built to allow access to all plots without damaging
vegetation. Warming occurred in three different peri-
ods: 2008 from June to November (initiation phase,
data not presented); 2009 from May to December; and
2010 from April to November.
The study area was instrumented with an air
temperature/relative humidity sensor (CS-215, Camp-
bell-Scientific Inc., Logan, UT, USA; height =
183 cm) and a tipping bucket rain gauge (TE525WS,
Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA; height =
100 cm) wired to a datalogger (CR1000, Campbell-
Scientific Inc.). Data were collected every minute, and
were binned into 20 min averages. Within each plot, a
thermocouple (Type-T copper constantan, Campbell-
Scientific Inc.) was installed 5 cm below the peat
surface and wired to a multiplexor (AM25T, Camp-
bell-Scientific Inc.) and a datalogger. Water table
levels were measured at 1-h intervals in a 1.5 m long,
10 cm diameter PVC well with a water table logger
(Levellogger Junior, Solinst, Georgetown, Ontario,
Canada) and a barometric pressure logger (Barrolog-
ger Gold, Solinst, Georgetown, Ontario). Volumetric
water content at 0–6 and 0–12 cm vertically beneath
the Sphagnum moss surface at each plot was measured
manually with a HydroSense� Water Content Sensor
(Campbell Scientific Inc., Australia) in July–October
of 2010. Temperature data from the nearby MTU Ford
Center Research Forest in Alberta, MI were used to
compare mean growing season temperatures and
summed degree-days (SDD; sum of mean daily
air temperatures [10 �C) from June–September,
2009–2011.
Porewater collection and analysis
Porewater was harvested from piezometers approxi-
mately bi-weekly throughout the growing seasons of
2009–2010, and approximately monthly following the
cessation of the heating treatments in 2011. Piezom-
eters were constructed of 2.54 cm diameter polyvinyl-
chloride pipe with 10 cm slotted regions covered with
40 lm Nitex nylon mesh. Slotted regions were
centered at depths of 25 and 50 cm beneath the peat
surface. Prior to sampling for chemical analyses, the
piezometers were pumped dry and allowed to
recharge. A small amount of pore water was pumped
into the collection flask as a pre-rinse for sample
collection in high density polyethylene (HDPE) Nal-
gene bottles. Approximately 150 mL of sample was
collected, and then samples were kept on ice packs in a
cooler and brought back to the laboratory where they
could be filtered through 0.45 lm nylon membrane
filters (less than a day from time of collection). After
filtration, samples were split into three parts: (1)
50 mL was acidified (pH 2) and refrigerated prior to
DOC and TDN analysis, (2) 50 mL was kept frozen
prior to anion and organic acid analysis, and (3) 10 mL
was diluted (1:10) and its ultraviolet absorbance at
k = 254 nm was immediately determined on a spec-
trophotometer using a 1 cm quartz cuvette (Spectra-
Max M2 multimode microplate reader; Molecular
Devices Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Blanks
of deionized water (with and without acidification)
were run with all analyses (approximately one for
every 15 samples). DON and TDN were run with a
TOCV Analyzer with TDN module, (Shimadzu Sci-
entific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA), and nitrate
(NO3-), acetate, formate, and oxalate were deter-
mined with an ICS-2000 ion chromatograph with an
IonPac AS11 separator column (Dionex Corporation,
Bannockburn, IL, USA). Ammonium (NH4–N) was
Biogeochemistry
123
determined spectrophotometrically using salicylate
and cyanurate reagents (Hach Co., Loveland, CO,
USA) following Sinsabaugh et al. (2000). Dissolved
organic N (DON) was determined as the difference
between TDN and dissolved inorganic N (DIN;
NH4–N plus NO3–N). We calculated specific ultravi-
olet absorbance (SUVA) by dividing absorbance at
k = 254 nm by DOC concentration, and reported
SUVA254 of DOC in units of L mg C-1 m-1. Total
dissolved iron concentrations were quantified spec-
trophotometrically (ammonium thioglycolate reagent,
Martini instruments MI 408 Iron High Range Meter,
Rocky Mount, NC, USA) throughout the summer of
2010 to determine possible interferences with
SUVA254 (cf. Weishaar et al. 2003). Dissolved oxygen
(DO) and specific conductivity were measured at 25
and 50 cm depths throughout the growing season.
Measurements were made within a slotted PVC well
(capped when not being measured) with Hach probes
(LDO101 and CDC401 probes with a HQ40d18 meter;
Hach Co., Loveland, CO, USA) which were calibrated
monthly with water-saturated air for DO and at
1,000 lS cm-1 (as NaCl) for conductivity.
Ultrahigh-resolution ESI-FT-ICR MS analysis
A 10 mL aliquot was prepared for Electrospray
Ionization Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Reso-
nance Mass Spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR MS) analysis
using solid phase extraction (Strata-X; Phenomenex
Inc., Torrence, CA, USA). For this purpose, 10 mL of
filtered and frozen porewater from two warmed plots
and two control plots in 2009, when the DOC
concentration differences were the greatest between
treatments at 25 cm (day of year 249). These samples
were applied to Strata-X solid phase extraction
cartridges (pre-conditioned with methanol and aceto-
nitrile), the cartridges were rinsed with high purity
water and dried, and DOC was washed out with
1.5 mL methanol (CHROMSOLV for HPLC). Sam-
ples were stored at -5 �C until further analysis.
The ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometric ana-
lysis was performed on a 7 tesla FT-ICR MS (LTQ FT
Ultra, Thermo Scientific) equipped with an ESI
source. For the analysis, the signal was optimized
with methanol dilution. The solution was directly
infused at 4 lL min-1 into the ESI interface. The ESI
probe was placed in position ‘‘B’’ and the needle
voltage was set between -3.7 and -3.8 kV (blanks
were run at -4.0 kV). The sample delivery apparatus
was flushed after each run with a minimum of 500 lL
of methanol/water (50/50) and 100 % methanol until
background noise level was reached. Negative ion
mass spectra were collected for the mass range of
100 \ m/z \ 1,000. The mass resolving power was set
at 400,000 (defined at m/z 400). Automatic gain
control was used to consistently fill the instrument
with the same number of ions (n = 1 9 106) for each
acquisition to avoid space charge effects from over
filling the mass analyzer. The instrument was exter-
nally calibrated in negative ion mode with a standard
solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate and taurocholic
acid, and the resulting mass accuracy was better than
2 ppm. Over 200 individual mass spectra were
collected and stored as transients by use of Thermo
Xcalibur software (Thermo Scientific, USA). Repli-
cate mass analysis was performed. Variances in the
analyte intensity and the reproducibility of low
relative abundance (RA) signals were calculated from
the replicate analyses.
Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR MS data were pro-
cessed using Sierra Analytics Composer software
previously described (Mazzoleni et al. 2010; Putman
et al. 2012). Briefly, *200 transients recorded in the
time domain were co-added to improve analyte detec-
tion (Kujawinski 2002; Stenson et al. 2003). The
molecular formula calculator was set to allow up to 70
carbon (C), 140 hydrogen (H), 25 oxygen (O), and 4
nitrogen (N) atoms per molecular formula composition.
A higher number of N was tested during the method
development. However, a higher number of chemically
unreasonable formula assignments without a significant
increase to the proportion of the assigned total ion
current was observed. Thus, the more conservative
method (with N B 4) was selected. The molecular
formula calculator, based on the PREDATOR algorithm
(Blakney et al. 2005), uses a Kendrick mass analysis
(Hughey et al. 2001) to sort ions into CH2 ‘‘homologous
series’’ and then assigns the de novo molecular formulas
B500 Da. In other words, all of the ions[500 Da either
belong to a CH2 series with de novo formulas B500 Da
or were not assigned. A threshold of 6 times the root
mean square values between 950\ m/z \ 1,000
(RA C 0.4 %) was applied to the data. Formulas
containing 13C corresponding to the monoisotopic
masses were also assigned and evaluated. Blank samples
were analyzed using the same method. The molecular
formulas resulting in measurement errors[3 ppm were
Biogeochemistry
123
discarded. Additional data filtering of the assigned
formulas was done by applying rules and assumptions as
described by Koch et al. (2005).
Enzyme activity assays
Enzyme assays were conducted on porewater samples
harvested prior to and following the senescence of
vegetation (early September and late October, respec-
tively). The enzymes assays were conducted using a
96-well plate format according to Sinsabaugh et al.
(2005). There were 16 technical replicates per sample.
Each replicate contained 200 lL of porewater and 50 lL
of substrate. Hydrolytic enzyme activity was estimated
using 200 lM fluorometric substrates including acid
phosphatase, b-glucosidase (glucosidase), cellobiohy-
drolase (cellulase) and N-acetyl-glucosaminidase (chiti-
nase). The hydrolytic enzyme assays included a blank
with 250 lL of reverse osmosis water, a substrate
correcting blank containing 200 lL of water and 50 lL
of substrate, a quenching blank containing 200 lL of
water and 50 lL of methylumbelliferone. Each of these
had 8 technical replicates per plate. Additionally, there
were 8 technical replicates containing 50 lL of meth-
ylumbelliferone and 200 lL of porewater for each
sample to calculate the quenching coefficient. Oxidative
enzyme activity was estimated using the L-dihydroxy-
phenylalanine (L-DOPA) substrate method to measure
phenol oxidase and peroxidase activity. There were 16
technical replicatesper sample, and 8 technical replicates
for blanks including 250 lL of water, 200 lL of buffer
and 50 lL of 5 mM L-DOPA substrate, and 200 lL of
porewater with 50 lL of water. The peroxidase assays
also had 10 lL of H2O2 added to all wells. All samples
were incubated at room temperature. Hydrolytic enzyme
samples incubated for 2 h, and then 10 lL of 1.0 M
NaOH was added to each well in order to stop the
reaction. Fluorescence was measured at an excitation of
364 nm and an emission wavelength of 450 nm using a
SpectraMax M2 plate reader (Molecular Devices Cor-
poration, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Oxidative enzyme
samples incubated for 24 h and the absorbance was
measured at 450 nm. Enzyme activities were calculated
according to German et al. 2011.
Porewater incubation
In May of 2010, 150 mL of porewater was harvested
from three heated and three control plots at 25 cm
depth. Samples from each plot were filtered as
previously described and 30 mL was put into five
60 mL precleaned and sample-rinsed HDPE bottles,
for a total of 30 bottles. 1 mL of common inoculum of
pore water filtered through a 1.6 mm glass fiber filter
(sequentially diluted to 10-3) was pipetted into each
bottle, following methods described by Wickland et al.
(2007). Bottles were then capped, gently shaken, and
incubated at 20 �C. A subset of six bottles (three
heated and three control plots) was acidified to
pH = 2 and measured for DOC and TDN concentra-
tions on the day the incubation was set up and 7, 14,
21, and 56 days later.
Statistical analyses
A repeated measures analysis of variance was con-
ducted using PROC MIXED to test for differences in
pore water DOC, DON, and SUVA254 between heated
and control treatments (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC,
USA, version 9.2). Warming treatment, depth, micro-
topography (hummock or hollow/lawn), day of year,
year, and depth and warming interactions were treated
as fixed effects, and day of year was treated as a
repeated measures with plot number acting as the
subject. We used variance components symmetry
covariance structure for repeated measures analysis as
determined by looking at the fit statistics and the
Kenward and Roger’s correction for degrees of
freedom (Littell et al. 2006). Type-3 tests of fixed
effects were considered significant at p \ 0.05. Ana-
lysis of covariance was used to determine the signif-
icance of changes in the relationship between DOC
and DON as a function of heating (Cody and Smith
1997). Least-squared mean value comparisons by
heating treatment and depth employed the Tukey–
Kramer adjustment. For comparisons of seasonal
mean values between heated and control plots we
conducted two-tailed t tests (a = 0.05).
Results
Temperature effects on DOC concentrations
Mean monthly peat temperatures measured at five cm
were 1.9 �C warmer in the heated plots (mean ± stan-
dard error; 18.4 ± 0.2 �C) than in the control plots
Biogeochemistry
123
(16.5 ± 0.2 �C) measured from June–August, 2009–
2010 (t = 5.03, p = 0.007). There was no significant
difference in mean monthly temperatures across
hummock or lawn microtopographies across all sam-
pling times at 5 cm (t = 0.18, p = 0.86), but some
opposing trends in temperatures between hummocks
and lawns were observed in June and July (Fig. 1e, f).
Mean temperatures measured at 42 cm throughout the
growing season of 2010 were not significantly differ-
ent between heated (16.6 ± 0.2 �C) and control plots
(16.3 ± 0.1 �C). Mean seasonal dissolved O2 concen-
tration at 50 cm was 1.1 ± 0.8 mg L-1 and mean
seasonal conductivity was 53.1 ± 4.7 lS s-1. Dis-
solved O2 declined as temperature increased in con-
current measurements at 50 cm throughout the growing
season (r = -0.69, F1,14 = 11.98, p = 0.004).
Growing season precipitation (May–September)
was 343 mm in 2009 and 483 in 2010, but mean
monthly water table depths (below peat surface) were
not different between 2009 (13.7 ± 3.2 cm) and 2010
(16.4 ± 3.1 cm) (t = 1.90, p = 0.15). The plots
received 40 % more precipitation in July of 2010
(77 mm) than in July of 2009 (47 mm), but mean July
water table depths were similar for these 2 months
(15.2 ± 2.5 vs. 16.8 ± 1.4 cm, respectively). Mean
peat moisture at 6 cm (6.0 ± 0.6 g g-1) and at 12 cm
(15.1 ± 2.1 g g-1) measured throughout the growing
season were not significantly different between heated
and control plots (t = 0.45, p = 0.66; and t = 0.34,
p = 0.74, respectively).
Mean peat porewater DOC concentrations at 25 cm
were 15 % higher in the heated plots (73.4 ±
3.2 mg L-1) than in the control plots (63.6 ± 2.1
mg L-1) across all sampling times in 2009–2010
(t = 4.69, p \0.001) (Fig. 2). Mean monthly porewater
DOC concentrations at 50 cm were not significantly
different between heated and control plots in 2009
(t = 1.01, p = 0.35; mean of 69.9 ± 2.0 mg L-1), but
were significantly different in 2010 (t = 4.47,
p = 0.001). There was a significant warming treatment
effect on DOC concentrations after accounting for
seasonal changes (Table 1). In fact, the increases in
mean monthly DOC concentrations in heated plots
relative to control plots generally corresponded with
mean increases in peat temperatures (Fig. 3). The largest
increases in DOC and peat temperature in heated plots
relative to control plots occurred later in the growing
season (August and September). There were no changes
in DOC concentrations by year (Fig. 2), depth, or
microtopography (hummock or lawn terrain)
(Table 1A). In 2011 there was no power being supplied
to the infrared lamps, and there were no differences in
mean DOC concentrations between the previously
heated (83.2 ± 3.4 mg L-1) and control (84.7 ±
5.3 mg L-1) plots measured at 25 cm throughout
June-October (n = 6 sampling dates, t = 0.33,
p = 0.76).
Fig. 1 Seasonal differences between the mean hourly peat temperatures (5 cm) of plots heated with infrared lamps and unheated
control plots. Negative values in pane (a) indicate periods when the heated plots were actually cooler than the control plots
Biogeochemistry
123
2009 2010
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
DO
C a
t 25
cm
(mg
L -1 )
control
heated
40
50
60
70
80
90
172
183
197
207
224
249
338
113
121
136
160
177
199
216
233
247
274
286
295
DO
C a
t 50
cm
(mg
L -1 )
Fig. 2 Mean daily DOC concentrations for heated and control plots at 25 cm (top pane) and 50 cm (bottom pane) throughout
2009–2010. Error bars are standard errors of the mean values
Table 1 Mixed-effects model of predictors of (A) dissolved
organic carbon and (B) dissolved organic nitrogen
Term Fixed
effects
F value
Degrees of
freedom
(num, den)
p
A: DOC
Depth 1.7 1, 276 0.1931
DOY 10.32 18, 276 \.0001
Heated or control 15.7 1, 276 \.0001
Hummock or lawn 1.69 1, 276 0.1944
DOY 9 heated 1.16 18, 276 0.291
Depth 9 heated 8.82 1, 276 0.0032
B: DON
Depth 0.89 1, 204 0.3460
DOY 5.64 16, 204 \.0001
Heated or control 0.15 1, 204 0.7030
Hummock or lawn 1.32 1, 204 0.2526
DOY 9 heated 0.71 16, 204 0.7868
Depthv 9 heated 5.56 1, 204 0.0193
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
*Jul
R2 = 0.99p = 0.004
R2 = 0.83p = 0.09
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Mea
n in
crea
se in
DO
C
rela
tive
to c
on
tro
l plo
ts (2
5 cm
, mg
L -1
)
Mean increase in peat temperature relative to control plots (5 cm, °C)
2009
2010
Fig. 3 Mean monthly increases in peat temperature are compared
to mean monthly increases in porewater DOC concentrations at
25 cm. Asterisk denotes a point not included in the regression
owing to a period of relatively heavy rainfall (standardized residual
error = 1.32). Error bars are standard errors of the mean values
Biogeochemistry
123
Temperature effects on porewater composition
and quality
A significant change in DOC with heating, with no
significant change in DON, would result in a different
DOC:DON ratio in response to heating. While DOC and
DON both exhibited significant seasonal changes, there
was no direct effect of heating on porewater DON
concentrations across all samples (Table 1B). There was
an interaction between heating and depth in explaining
variation in DON concentrations (Table 1B), owing to
the increase in DON at 25 cm in heated plots
(1.31 ± 0.06 mg N L-1) compared to control plots
(1.20 ± 0.06 mg N L-1) across all dates (t = 2.37,
p = 0.03); this difference was not found at 50 cm
(t = 1.14, p = 0.27). As expected, DON increased with
DOC, and there was a marginal interaction between
heating and DOC in explaining variation in DON
(F1,240 = 2.90, p = 0.09; Fig. 4). When the correlation
between DOC and DON was accounted for in
ANCOVA, heating had a weak but significant effect
on DON concentrations across all sampling depths
(F1,240 = 4.19, p = 0.04). As such, the amount of DON
per unit DOC declined in heated plots relative to control
plots (Fig. 4). Mean DIN concentrations were small
across all sampling times (0.08 ± 0.02 mg N L-1), and
there were no significant differences between heated and
control plots (t = 1.06, p = 0.29).
Heating significantly reduced porewater aromatic-
ity (Fig. 5). Porewater aromaticity changed with depth
and season as could be expected, but also changed
with heating and was a significant covariate with the
DOC:DON ratio (Table 2). Mean total dissolved Fe
concentrations were not different between heated
(2.1 ± 0.4 mg L-1) or control plots (1.6 ±
0.2 mg L-1; t = 1.55, p = 0.16), and therefore any
potential Fe interference of treatment effects on
SUVA254 were minimal. In addition, DOC from the
heated plots decayed twice as fast as control plot DOC
control
R2 = 0.36
heated
R2 = 0.49
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
30 60 90 120
DOC (mg L -1)
DO
N (m
g L
-1)
control
heated
Fig. 4 The slope of the relationship between DON and DOC
declined with heating in analysis of covariance (F1,240 = 4.19,
p = 0.04). Coefficients describing the trends are b0 = 0.38 ±
0.09, b1 = 0.013 ± 0.001 for heated plots and b0 = 0.18 ±
0.13, b1 = 0.017 ± 0.002 for control plots
1:1
2.5
3.5
4.5
2.5 3.5 4.5
Mean SUVA254
in control plots
Mea
n S
UV
A25
4
in h
eate
d p
lots
25 cm
50 cm
Fig. 5 Mean daily porewater Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance
at 254 nm (SUVA254; L mg C-1 m-1) measurements were
lower in heated plots than in control plots across all depths and
sampling days (t = 2.76, p = 0.011). Error bars are standard
errors of the mean values
Table 2 Mixed-effects model of predictors of specific ultra-
violet absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254; L mg C-1 m-1)
Term Fixed
effects
F value
Degrees of
freedom
(num, den)
p
Depth 5.23 1, 143 0.0236
DOY 2.61 12, 143 0.0036
DOC:DON 29.18 1, 143 \.0001
Heated or control 5.05 1, 143 0.0261
Hummock or lawn 0 1, 143 0.9811
DOC:DON 9 DOY 2.71 12, 143 0.0025
DOC:DON 9 heated 4.47 1, 143 0.0362
Depth 9 heated 3.45 1, 143 0.0654
Biogeochemistry
123
within the first 3 weeks of a 2 month laboratory
incubation experiment, with exponential decay coef-
ficients for heated plot DOC being -1.8 9 10-3
± 8.4 9 10-4 compared to -8.0 9 10-4 ± 3.7 9
10-4 for the control plot DOC (Fig. 6). The exponen-
tial decay coefficients for DOC incubated for 56 days
were not different for porewater collected from the
heated (-8.6 9 10-4 ± 3.2 9 10-4) and control
plots (-9.2 9 10-4 ± 1.1 9 10-4).
Perhaps surprisingly, SUVA254 was negatively
related to the dissolved organic C:N ratio across all
samples (r = -0.47, p \ 0.001; see also Table 2).
Collectively, these results suggest that the higher DOC
concentrations present in the warming treatments were
relatively aliphatic in nature, while also being asso-
ciated with a higher dissolved C:N ratio.
Ultrahigh resolution mass spectrometry revealed
that, within the pool of relatively small compounds
(*200–800 Da) that are able to deprotonate, there
were small differences in peat porewater composition
with heating. Compounds unique to the heated plots
had lower mean H:C ratios and higher DBE than
compounds unique to the control plots (Fig. 7).
Compounds unique to the heated plots (289 identified)
were generally more condensed and less oxidized than
compounds unique to the control plots (Fig. 8). 17 %
of the 1,545 biomolecular assignments made for the
warmed plot DOC were in the range of protein and
carbohydrate containing compounds (H:C [ 1.5,
O:C [ 0.3), whereas only 8 % of the 1,516 biomo-
lecular assignments fell within the range of amino-
sugars in the control plot DOC (Fig. 8). Porewater
y = 56.7e-0.0018x
R2 = 0.69
y = 49.6e-0.0008x
R2 = 0.70
47
50
53
56
59
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63
day of incubation
DO
C o
f in
cub
ated
sam
ple
s (m
g L
-1 )
Fig. 6 Reduction in dissolved organic carbon over a 56 day
laboratory incubation. Each point is the mean DOC concentra-
tion of porewater from three heated (opaque diamonds) or three
control (squares) plots. Negative exponential relationships are
plotted for the first 21 days only. Error bars are standard errors
of the mean values (n = 3 plots)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
O:C H:C N:C DBE/10
Wei
ghte
d R
elat
ive
Abun
danc
e
Control, all Heated, allControl, unique Heated, unique
Fig. 7 Mean weighted relative abundances of O:C, H:C, N:C and
the DBE of all molecular formulas present in the sample, and of the
molecular formulas unique to a given sample. Data represent the
assigned molecular formulas of samples from two control plots
and two heated plots collected on the same day at 25 cm depth.
Error bars are standard errors of the mean values (n = 2)
Fig. 8 Van Krevelen diagram of porewater harvested from two
heated and two control plots. Points represent the composition of
molecular assignments unique to heated (gray) or control
(white) plots. Points depicted by a times symbol are molecular
assignments common in all pore water
Biogeochemistry
123
from the heated plots exhibited greater biomolecular
assignments associated with aromatic compounds,
with 35 % of the biomolecular assignments occurring
above the threshold for AI [ 0.5 (Koch and Dittmar
2006).
The three organic acids measured changed in
different ways with the heating treatment, though
responses were variable and not statistically significant.
Least-squares mean acetate concentrations decreased
from 0.32 to 0.16 mg L-1 with heating, but were not
significantly different (F1,244 = 1.80, p = 0.18). For-
mate (mean concentrations ranging from 0.10 mg L-1
in control plots to 0.12 mg L-1 in the heated plots) and
oxalate (mean concentrations ranging from 0.20 to
0.26 mg L-1, respectively) concentrations were also
unaffected by the heating treatment (F1,244 = 2.04,
p = 0.16, and F1,244 = 2.25, p = 0.14, respectively).
Least-squared mean acetate concentrations increased
with depth from 25 to 50 cm (0.06–0.42 mg L-1
respectively; F1,244 = 7.90, p = 0.005).
Enzyme activities
Porewater extracellular enzyme activities were
affected by heating treatment and also changed
seasonally (Table 3). Chitinase and glucosidase activ-
ities were significantly affected by warming, with
mean activities increasing by 58 and 138 %, respec-
tively (Table 3, p = 0.005 and p = 0.03, respec-
tively). Cellulase, acid phosphatase, and phenol
oxidase activities exhibited seasonal changes as might
be expected, but did not change in response to warming
(Table 3). Cellulase activity increased during leaf
senescence in both the heated and control treatments
(p = 0.002). Phosphatase and phenol oxidase activity
were higher during leaf out versus leaf senescence
in both treatments (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002,
respectively).
Discussion
Temperature effects on DOC concentrations
and composition
The increase in DOC concentrations with heating
observed in this experiment was expected because the
water-soluble products of decomposition and biogenic
DOC should both increase with warming, because
decomposition and microbial activity are temperature
dependent. We observed a strong seasonal effect on
DOC concentrations, which is consistent with many
studies reporting patterns of peat DOC concentrations
that track temperatures and plant and microbial activity
throughout the growing season (Dalva and Moore
1991; Heikkinen 1994; Tegen and Dorr 1996; Scott
et al. 1998; Tipping et al. 1999; Kalbitz et al. 2000).
The growing season of 2011 was considerably warmer
(1962, SDD) than 2010 (1919 SDD) or 2009 (1814
SDD); this was coincident with mean porewater DOC
concentrations that were*22 % higher across all plots
in 2011 than was measured in 2009–2010. This
seasonal increase in mean DOC concentrations
observed in the warm year is similar in magnitude to
the increase in DOC measured with active heating at
the peat surface. A unique aspect of this study was the
increase in DOC concentrations measured in response
to warming which was independent of temporal
variability. This effect is confirmed by the fact that
there were no differences in DOC concentrations
Table 3 Changes in porewater enzyme activities (25 cm depth) in late summer and following senescence in both control and heated
plots (±standard error of the mean)
Treatment Season Chitinase Glucosidase Cellulase Phosphatase Phenol oxidase Peroxidase
Control Leaf out 0.118 (0.009) 0.287 (0.087) 0.066 (0.001) 1.475 (0.270) 0.030 (0.002) 0.013 (0.003)
Senescent 0.140 (0.002) 0.123 (\ .001) 0.208 (0.011) 0.539 (0.131) 0.002 (0.001) 0.011 (0.002)
Heated Leaf out 0.186 (0.005) 0.593 (0.003) 0.079 (0.002) 1.879 (0.480) 0.017 (0.002) 0.018 (0.009)
Senescent 0.182 (0.025) 0.380 (0.137) 0.319 (0.044) 0.432 (0.087) 0.002 (0.001) 0.001 (0.001)
Differences (t, p; n = 8)
By treatment 4.28, 0.005 2.76, 0.03 0.76, 0.48 0.27, 0.80 0.73, 0.50 0.35, 0.74
By season 0.34, 0.75 1.42, 0.21 5.12, 0.002 4.53, 0.004 5.44, 0.002 1.90, 0.11
Units are in nmol h-1, except phenol oxidase and peroxidase, which are in lmol h-1. Significant differences by treatment or season
(a = 0.05) are in bold text
Biogeochemistry
123
between previously heated and control plots in 2011,
when there was no power being supplied to the infrared
lamps. Moreover, we began to see separation in deeper
porewater DOC concentrations with warming in the
second year of the heating treatment, even though
temperatures at 50 cm were not significantly altered by
the experiment. This, too, likely reflects an influence of
heating on vegetation, and resulting interactions with
root-associated microorganisms and root activity in
addition to the downward diffusion of porewater. In a
3 year passive warming experiment in an alpine fen
peatland, a structural equation modeling effort esti-
mated a 23 % increase in the weight of litter-layer
microbial community effects on water chemistry
(Jassey et al. 2012). Jassey et al. (2012) suggested that
by inhibiting higher trophic levels within the microbial
community, interactions between Sphagnum-derived
polyphenols and warmer temperatures could actually
increase nutrient levels and dissolved C release. We
note here that passive warming effects on DOC and
TDN concentrations in the alpine fen study were
variable, with warming only significantly increasing
DOC concentrations in the third year of temperature
manipulation, and with no effect on TDN. Neverthe-
less, these results generally agree with those presented
herein, and demonstrate that modest warming at the
peat surface can have significant direct effects on DOC
concentrations and complex indirect effects on micro-
bial activity and porewater character.
Humic substances released by plant roots and
microorganisms are of a relatively lower molecular
weight (more aliphatic) than are the water-soluble
products of decomposition, which are more comprised
of high molecular-weight (aromatic) compounds (Thur-
man 1985; McKnight and Aiken 1998). In this study,
the relative aromaticity of peat porewater declined in
the warmed plots relative to control (Table 2; Fig. 5),
but the character of the pool of biomolecules that were
able to deprotonate (*200–800 Da) did not change
appreciably with modest warming at the peat surface
(Fig. 7). Compounds unique to the heating treatment
had narrower H:C and O:C ratios than control plots
(Fig. 8), suggesting a more aromatic or condense
structured DOM (Hedges 1990). While these results
may appear to be at odds with the SUVA254 data, they
suggest that most of the change in bulk porewater
composition with heating occurred in the fraction of
compounds not well quantified with the ultra-high
resolution mass spectrometry in this study. Increases in
the concentrations of relatively labile low molecular
weight DOC are consistent with increased microbial
activity (as observed with hydrophilic acids; Bourbon-
niere 1989; Guggenberger et al. 1994). It is possible that
the changes in novel compounds present in the heated
plots relative to control reflect increasing amounts of
microbially derived humic acids or the diagenesis of
polysaccharides (oxygen-rich biochemicals)-these pro-
cesses would result in narrower H:C and O:C ratios
within the pool of relatively large molecular weight
DOM (see, for example, Visser 1983). Interpretation of
these data are not straightforward, however, because
larger biomolecules initially released from peatland
vegetation and mosses can be degraded into smaller
components fairly rapidly (Gonet and Debska 1998;
Strack et al. 2011; cf. Wickland et al. 2007); this is a
transformation which would likely be facilitated at
warmer temperatures. In this study, novel compounds in
the heated and control plots both generally had lower
DBE and there was a decrease in the appearance of
unsaturated and/or oxygenated compounds, which
could indicate that the unique compounds in both
treatments were more labile (Tfaily et al. 2013). One
consistency between the FT-ICR MS data and analysis
of mean porewater constituent concentrations within
the much larger dataset was that an increase in N:C ratio
in novel compounds generally corresponded with
higher DBE (Fig. 7). This finding is consistent with a
higher N:C generally occurring in the unheated control
plots (Fig. 4), which also had higher SUVA254. The
increase in N:C while also having higher aromaticity
could be indicative of amine complexation with
carboxylic groups or protein complexation with phe-
nolic OH groups (McManus et al. 1985; Spencer et al.
1988; Munster and de Haan 1998). It could be that with
increased breakdown of larger humic substances with
warming, or with an increase in the abundance of lower
molecular weight compounds, there is less complexa-
tion of proteinaceous compounds with DOM (lower
dissolved N:C). Future studies employing emerging
technologies in liquid chromatography and mass spec-
trometry (cf. Liu et al. 2011; Remucal et al. 2012), in
conjunction with field manipulation experiments, are
needed to fully appreciate exactly how the character of
DOM is likely to change in a warmer climate.
Notwithstanding, these findings suggest different mech-
anisms of DOM production and consumption within
different biomolecular size classes in response to
warming at the peat surface.
Biogeochemistry
123
In this study, warming resulted in an increase in
relatively aliphatic DOC, with no statistical increases
in DON (Table 1B; Fig. 4). In contrast, studies have
shown that the ratio of aliphatic to aromatic DOC is
generally higher in aquatic systems with more DON
relative to DOC (McKnight and Aiken 1998). Aro-
matic structures present in DOC would largely come
from the degradation of plant-derived lignin (and
possibly the products of burning), whereas aliphatic
DOC would largely come from microbes, algal
exudates, and root exudates in the rhizosphere
(Hatcher and Spiker 1988; McKnight and Aiken
1998; Benner 2003). The observed declines in aro-
matic DOC relative to DON with warming could
suggest that N-containing biomolecules were not
generally exuded within the rhizosphere, or that
soluble N was rapidly immobilized. Because of the
absence of lignin in microorganisms and the fact that
SUVA254 decreased with warming, these results
suggest that the increase in DOC with warming was
largely derived from plants and plant–microbe inter-
actions within the rhizosphere, and not from the
breakdown of organic matter. This is consistent with
previous research in boreal peatlands showing that
porewater DOC is quite reactive and is composed of
relatively modern C affected by rhizosphere pro-
cesses, particularly when sedges are abundant (Chan-
ton et al. 2008). Complementary research at this site
has shown increased gross ecosystem productivity
with warming on the hummock-dominated plots, with
no differences in ecosystem respiration (Johnson et al.
2013). Together, these findings suggest that the
increased DOC concentrations observed with warm-
ing were derived more from plants and plant–microbe
interactions within the rhizosphere than from the
accumulation of products from decomposition of
organic material.
Temperature effects on porewater enzyme activity
Extracellular enzyme activities of the porewater dif-
fered by warming treatment for chitinase and glucosi-
dase, and differed seasonally for cellulase, phosphatase
and phenol oxidase activities. This suggests that the
controls on enzymatic metabolism are dependent on
environmental conditions. Chitinase, a carbon and
nitrogen-acquiring enzyme, may have higher activity
in heated treatments due to a higher rate of nitrogen
cycling in heated plots. This has been demonstrated in
upland temperate forests (Melillo et al. 2011, Butler
et al. 2012). In Arctic tundra soils, temperature has been
shown to be the strongest driver of hydrolytic enzyme
activities, though low activities have been observed in
the summer- possibly owing to a tight nitrogen cycle
and nitrogen limitations for enzyme production (Wal-
lenstein et al. 2009). More chitinase enzymes may be
produced, or the efficiency of chitinase enzymes may
increase with warming. Fungi produce the majority of
chitinase enzymes, and it has been demonstrated that
fungal abundance increases with warming in tundra
ecosystems (Clemmensen et al. 2006). Allison and
Treseder (2008) found that warming with closed-toped
greenhouses in a boreal forest lead to a decline in fungal
abundance and chitinase activity, however their study
might have been confounded with drying of the organic
horizon caused by the impediment of precipitation due
to the structure of the greenhouses. This study used
infrared lamps, which did not block moisture inputs
from precipitation. In a survey of 32 diverse wetlands
from around the world, Kang et al. (2005) demonstrated
that chitinase (N-acetylglucosaminidase) activities
associated with solid-phase peat increased with mean
annual temperatures measured in the field. While the
increasing potential chitinase activities measured with
increasing temperatures presented by Kang et al. (2005)
were over a magnitude greater than those measured in
this study (confer with Table 3), the results indicate that
chitinase activities associated with both solid and
dissolved phases are likely to increase with modest
warming in peat soil.
Glucosidase activity was also higher in heated
treatments. This may be due to an increase in the
amount of substrate available in heated treatments, or
to changes in the amount or efficiency of glucosidase
enzymes in the porewater. Since relatively aliphatic
compounds and DOC concentrations both increased
with warming, it seems likely that the concentration of
polysaccharides broken down by glucosidase has
increased with warming. Moreover, there was no
measured increase in phenol oxidase activity with
warming, which could allow for an accumulation of
phenolics with warmer temperatures, barring any co-
occurring changes in water table position and
increased aeration (Freeman et al. 2001b). Taken
together, these data suggest increased hydrolytic
enzyme activity could contribute in part to higher
concentrations of DOC with a warmer climate, which
fits nicely with reports suggesting a temperature (and
Biogeochemistry
123
enzyme) mediated rising trend in DOC concentrations
in runoff is underway (Freeman et al. 2001a).
We observed seasonal changes in hydrolytic and
oxidative enzyme activity potentials. Phosphatase
activity was higher in the leaf out period versus the
senescent period, indicating that phosphorus-acquiring
enzymes either have more substrate available, or have
a higher abundance or specific activity earlier in the
season. Phenol oxidase activity was also higher during
leaf-out than at the end of the growing season. This
suggests that there is either higher abundance or
efficiency of phenol oxidase enzymes or that there is a
higher polyphenol concentration early versus late in
the growing season. Although it is unclear which
mechanism may be involved, it is possible that the type
of phenol oxidase enzymes changes seasonally, due to
the wide variety of enzymes that depolymerize poly-
phenols and the relative instability of oxidative
enzymes versus hydrolytic enzymes (Sinsabaugh
2010). A previous study in an alpine peatland has
shown increased peroxidase activity with passive
warming, which was three orders of magnitude higher
than phenol oxidase activity (Jassey et al. 2012). While
we did observe higher oxidative enzyme activity in
September than in October, we did not observe large
differences between phenol oxidase or peroxidase
enzyme activity potentials, and there was no signifi-
cant effect of heating on oxidative enzyme activity
potentials. We measured enzyme activity potentials in
peat pore water, and it is possible that oxidative
enzymes associated with the solid phase (particle-
associated extracellular enzymes, or humus-enzyme
complexes) are more sensitive to changes in environ-
mental conditions than are free floating extracellular
enzymes associated with dissolved organic matter
(Hoppe 1991; Munster and de Haan 1998). Cellulase
activity increased during leaf senescence versus leaf
out. This may be due to an increase in concentrations of
more complex polysaccharides as leaf litter accumu-
lates. It is also possible that there is a decrease in the
relative concentration of simple polysaccharides dur-
ing this period, as evidenced by a non-significant
decrease in glucosidase activity from leaf out to
senescence. More data is needed on the relative
abundances of the chemical species present in the
two seasons to allow us to draw further conclusions
about the impact of substrate concentrations on
porewater enzyme activities.
Conclusions
We observed increases in porewater DOC concen-
trations and a slight decline in porewater aromaticity
with modest warming at the peat surface over
2 years. We also observed increases in hydrolytic
enzyme activity potentials in response to warming.
Earlier work at this study site has shown increased
gross primary production, with little change in
ecosystem respiration with active warming at the
peat surface (Johnson et al. 2013) and the observed
changes in porewater character are consistent with
increases in vegetation production and increased
microbial activity in shallow peat. Moreover, we
observed increases in DON:DOC generally corre-
sponding with higher aromaticity in the unheated
control plots. This was also observed within the suite
of novel compounds measured in the heated plots,
which had higher N:C and DBE than the control
plots. However, all novel compounds had lower DBE
than did compounds common to both heated and
control plots. These data suggest a tight coupling of
climate effects on the peatland biosphere and pore-
water chemistry, with different consequences for the
production and diagenesis of relatively large and
small biomolecules. Collectively, these data support
other studies which indicate DOC concentrations are
likely to increase in organic soils with the predicted
warming likely to occur in the coming decades. With
continued warming in peatlands, an increase in
relatively labile DOC concentrations could contrib-
ute to dissolved exports of DOC in runoff, and would
likely contribute to the pool of efficient electron
donors (and acceptors) in the production of CO2 and
CH4 in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Future
work examining how DOC export is likely to change
in a warmer climate, either by mineralization or in
runoff, is necessary to understand the consequences
of any temperature mediated increases in DOC
concentrations in soil.
Acknowledgments This research was supported by the U.S.
Department of Energy’s Office of Science (BER) through the
Midwestern Regional Center of the National Institute for Climatic
Change Research at Michigan Technological University as well
as the Michigan Technological University Ecosystem Science
Center. We would like to thank Justina Silva and Jennifer
Eikenberry for help with laboratory analysis, and Arvo Aljaste
and Kristen Schmitt for help with field work. We appreciate the
constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers.
Biogeochemistry
123
References
Aitkenhead JA, McDowell WH (2000) Soil C: N ratio as a
predictor of annual riverine DOC flux at local and global
scales. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14(1):127–138
Albert DA, Wilcox DA, Ingram JW, Thompson TA (2005)
Hydrogeomorphic classification for Great Lakes coastal
wetlands. J Great Lakes Res 31:129–146
Alewell C, Paul S, Storck FR (2008) Co-regulation of redox
processes in freshwater wetlands as a function of organic
matter availability? Sci Total Environ 404:335–342
Allison SD, Treseder KK (2008) Warming and drying suppress
microbial activity and carbon cycling in boreal forest soils.
Glob Chang Biol 14:2898–2909
Alvarez-Cobelas M, Angeler DG, Sanchez-Carrillo S, Almendros
G (2012) A worldwide view of organic carbon export from
catchments. Biogeochemistry 107(1–3):275–293
Battin TJ, Luyssaert S, Kaplan LA, Aufdenkampe AK, Richter
A, Tranvik LJ (2009) The boundless carbon cycle. Nat
Geosci 2:598–600
Benner R (2003) Molecular indicators of the bioavailability of
dissolved organic matter. In: Findlay SEG, Sinsabaugh RL
(eds) Aquatic ecosystems: interactivity of dissolved
organic matter. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 121–135
Blakney GT, Robinson DE, Ly NV, Kelleher NL, Hendrickson
CL, Marshall AG (2005) Predator: PCI data station for FT-
ICR mass spectrometry. 53rd American Society of Mass
Spectrometry Annual Conference on Mass Spectrometry &
Allied Topics, San Antonio
Blodau C, Basiliko N, Moore TR (2004) Carbon turnover in
peatland mesocosms exposed to different water table lev-
els. Biogeochemistry 67(3):331–351
Boisvert E (2009) Initiation and development of three lake
superior costal peatlands. MS Thesis, Michigan Techno-
logical University, Houghton, p 77
Borken W, Ahrens B, Schulz C, Zimmermann L (2011) Site-to-
site variability and temporal trends of DOC concentrations
and fluxes in temperate forest soils. Glob Chang Biol
17(7):2428–2443
Bourbonniere RA (1989) Distribution patterns of dissolved
organic matter fractions in natural waters from eastern
Canada. Org Geochem 14:97–107
Bukaveckas PA, Robbins-Forbes M (2000) Role of dissolved
organic matter in the attenuation of photosynthetically
active and ultraviolet radiation in Adirondack lakes.
Freshw Biol 43:339–354
Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Strom-
berger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A
(2013) Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current
knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem
58:216–234
Butler SM, Melillo JM, Johnson JE, Mohan J, Steudler PA, Lux
H, Burrows E, Smith RM, Vario CL, Scott L, Hill TD,
Aponte N, Bowles F (2012) Soil warming alters nitrogen
cycling in a New England forest: implications for ecosys-
tem function and structure. Oecologia 168:819–828
Caldwell B (2005) Enzyme activities as a component of soil
biodiversity: a review. Pedobiologia 49:637–644
Chanton JP, Glaser PH, Chasar LS, Brudige DJ, Hines ME,
Siegel DI, Tremblay LB, Cooper WT (2008) Radiocarbon
evidence for the importance of surface vegetation on fer-
mentation and methanogenesis in contrasting types of
boreal peatlands. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB4022.
doi:10.1029/2008GB003274
Christ MJ, David MB (1996) Temperature and moisture effects
on the production of dissolved organic carbon in a Spod-
osol. Soil Biol Biochem 28:1191–1199
Clark JM, Ashley D, Wagner M, Chapman PJ, Lane SN, Evans
CD, Heathwaite AL (2009) Increased temperature sensi-
tivity of net DOC production from ombrotrophic peat due
to water table draw-down. Glob Chang Biol 15:794–807
Clark JM, Bottrell SH, Evans CD, Monteith DT, Bartlett R, Rose
R, Newton RJ, Chapman PJ (2010) The importance of the
relationship between scale and process in understanding
long-term DOC dynamics. Sci Total Environ. doi:10.1016/
j.scitotenv.2010.02.046
Clemmensen KE, Michelsen A, Jonasson S, Shaver GR (2006)
Increased ectomycorrhizal fungal abundance after long-
term fertilization and warming of two arctic tundra eco-
systems. New Phytol 171:391–404
Cody RP, Smith JK (1997) Applied statistics and the SAS
programming language. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Dalva M, Moore TR (1991) Sources and sinks of dissolved
organic carbon in a forested swamp catchment. Biogeo-
chemistry 15:1–19
Driscoll CT, Driscoll KM, Roy KM, Mitchell MJ (2003)
Chemical response of lakes in the Adirondack region of
New York to declines in acidic deposition. Environ Sci
Technol 37:2036–2042
Evans CD, Monteith DT, Cooper DM (2005) Long-term
increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon:
observations, possible causes and environmental impacts.
Environ Pollut 137:55–71
Evans CD, Jones TG, Burden A, Ostle N, Zielinski P, Cooper
MDA, Peacock M, Clark JM, Oulehle F, Cooper D, Free-
man C (2012) Acidity controls on dissolved organic carbon
mobility in organic soils. Glob Chang Biol 18:3317–3331
Fenner N, Freeman C, Lock MA, Harmens H, Reynolds B,
Sparks T (2007) Interactions between elevated CO2 and
warming could amplify DOC exports from peatland
catchments. Environ Sci Technol 41:3146–3152
Freeman C, Evans CD, Monteith DT (2001a) Export of organic
carbon from peat soils. Nature 412:785
Freeman C, Ostle N, Kang H (2001b) An enzymic ‘latch’ on a
global carbon store. Nature 409:149–150
Freeman C, Fenner N, Ostle NJ, Kang H, Dowrick DJ, Reynolds
B, Lock MA, Sleep D, Hughes S, Hudson J (2004) Export
of dissolved organic carbon from peatlands under elevated
carbon dioxide levels. Nature 430:195–198
German DP, Weintraub MN, Grandy AS, Lauber CL, Rinkes
ZL, Allison SD (2011) Optimization of hydrolytic and
oxidative enzyme methods for ecosystem studies. Soil Biol
Biochem 43(7):1387–1397
Gonet SS, Debska B (1998) Properties of humic acids developed
during humification process of post-harvest plant residues.
Environ Int 24:603–608
Guggenberger G, Zech W, Schulten H (1994) Formation and
mobilization of dissolved organic matter: evidence form
chemical structural studies of organic matter fractions in
acid forest floor solutions. Org Geochem 21:51–66
Biogeochemistry
123
Hatcher PG, Spiker EC (1988) Selective degradation of plant
biomolecules. In: Frimmel FH, Christman RF (eds) Humic
substances and their role in the environment. Wiley, New
York, pp 59–74
Hedges JI (1990) Compositional indicators of organic acid
sources and reactions in natural environments. In: Perdue
EM, Gjessing ET (eds) Organic acids in aquatic ecosys-
tems. Wiley, New York, pp 43–64
Heikkinen K (1994) Organic matter, iron and nutrient transport
and nature of dissolved organic matter in the drainage basin
of a boreal humic river in northern Finland. Sci Total
Environ 152:81–89
Heitmann T, Goldhammer T, Beer J, Blodau C (2007) Electron
transfer of dissolved organic matter and its potential sig-
nificance for anaerobic respiration in a northern bog. Glob
Chang Biol 13:1771–1785
Hessen DO (1992) Dissolved organic carbon in a small humic
lake: effects on bacterial production and respiration.
Hydrobiologia 229:115–123
Holl BS, Fiedler S, Jungkunst HF, Kalbitz K, Freibauer A,
Drosler M, Stahr K (2009) Characteristics of dissolved
organic matter following 20 years of peatland restoration.
Sci Total Environ 408:78–83
Hoppe HG (1991) Microbial extracellular enzyme activity: a
new key parameter in aquatic ecology. In: Chrost RJ (ed)
Microbial enzymes in aquatic environments. Springer,
Berlin, pp 60–83
Hughey CA, Hendrickson CL, Rodgers RP, Marshall AG, Qian
KN (2001) Kendrick mass defect spectrum: a compact
visual analysis for ultrahigh-resolution broadband mass
spectra. Anal Chem 73(19):4676–4681
Jassey VEJ, Chiapusio G, Gilbert D, Toussaint ML, Binet P
(2012) Phenoloxidase and peroxidase activities in Sphag-
num-dominated peatland in a warming climate. Soil Biol
Biochem 46:49–52
Jassey VEJ, Chiapusio G, Binet P, Buttler A, Laggoun-Defarge F,
Delarue F, Bernard N, Mitchell EAD, Toussaint ML, Fran-
cez AJ, Gilbert D (2013) Above- and belowground linkages
in Sphagnum peatland: climate warming affects plant–
microbial interactions. Glob Chang Biol 19(3):811–823
Joanisse GD, Bradley RL, Preston CM, Munson AD (2007) Soil
enzyme inhibition by condensed litter tannins may drive
ecosystem structure and processes: the case of Kalmia
angustifolia. New Phytol 175:535–546
Johansson EM, Fransson PMA, Finlay RD, van Hees PAW
(2009) Quantitative analysis of soluble exudates produced
by ectomycorrhizal roots as a response to ambient and
elevated CO2. Soil Biol Biochem 41(6):1111–1116
Johnson CP, Pypker TG, Hribljan JA, Chimner RA (2013) Open
top chambers and infrared lamps: a comparison of heating
efficacy and CO2/CH4 dynamics in a Northern Michigan
Peatland. Ecosystems 16(5):736–748
Judd KE, Kling GW (2002) Production and export of dissolved
C in arctic tundra mesocosms: the roles of vegetation and
water flow. Biogeochemistry 60(3):213–234
Kalbitz K, Solinger S, Park JH, Michalzik B, Matzner E (2000)
Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in
soils: a review. Soil Sci 165(4):277–304
Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E (2003) Bio-
degradation of soil-derived dissolved organic matter as
related to its properties. Geoderma 113(3–4):273–291
Kane ES, Valentine DW, Michaelson GJ, Fox JD, Ping C-L
(2006) Controls over pathways of carbon efflux from soils
along climate and black spruce productivity gradients in
interior Alaska. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1438–1450
Kane ES, Turetsky MR, Harden JW, McGuire AD, Waddington
JM (2010) Seasonal ice and hydrologic controls on dis-
solved organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations in a
boreal-rich fen. J Geophys Res 115:G04012. doi:10.1029/
2010JG001366
Kang H, Freeman C, Park SS, Chun J (2005) N-Acetylgluco-
saminidase activities in wetlands: a global survey. Hyd-
robiologia 532:103–110
Keller JK, Weisenhorn PB, Megonigal JP (2009) Humic acids as
electron acceptors in wetland decomposition. Soil Biol
Biochem 41:1518–1522
Koch BP, Dittmar T (2006) From mass to structure: an aroma-
ticity index for high-resolution mass data of natural organic
matter. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:926–932
Koch BP, Witt MR, Engbrodt R, Dittmar T, Kattner G (2005)
Molecular formulae of marine and terrigenous dissolved
organic matter detected by electrospray ionization Fourier
transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.
Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69(13):3299–3308
Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E (2007) Temperature sensi-
tivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and
potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils.
Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21(4):GB4017
Kolka RK, Grigal DF, Nater EA, Verry ES (2001) Hydrologic
cycling of mercury and organic carbon in a forested
upland-bog watershed. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:897–905
Kujawinski EB (2002) Electrospray ionization Fourier trans-
form ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (ESI FT-
ICR MS): characterization of complex environmental
mixtures. Environ Forensics 3(3–4):207–216
Kullberg A, Bishop KH, Hargeby A, Jansson M, Petersen RC
(1993) The ecological significance of dissolved organic-
carbon in acidified waters. Ambio 22:331–337
Kuzyakov Y (2002) Review: factors affecting rhizosphere
priming effects. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:382–396
Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WA, Wolfinger RD, Scha-
benberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS
Institute Inc, Cary
Liu Z, Sleighter RL, Zhong J, Hatcher PG (2011) The chemical
changes of DOM from black waters to coastal marine
waters by HPLC combined with ultrahigh resolution mass
spectrometry. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 92:205–216
Mazzoleni LR, Ehrmann BM, Shen XH, Marshall AG, Collett
JL (2010) Water-soluble atmospheric organic matter in
fog: exact masses and chemical formula identification by
ultrahigh-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron reso-
nance mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 44(10):
3690–3697
McDowell WH, Likens G (1988) Origin, composition, and flux
of dissolved organic carbon in the Hubbard Brook valley.
Ecol Monogr 58:177–195
McKnight DM, Aiken GR (1998) Sources and age of aquatic
humus. In: Hessen DO, Tranvik LJ (eds) Aquatic humic
substances—ecology and biogeochemistry. Ecological
studies 133. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–40
McManus JP, Davis KG, Beart JE, Gaffey SH, Lilley TH, Ha-
slam E (1985) Polyphenol interactions. Part 1.
Biogeochemistry
123
Introduction. Some observations on the reversible com-
plexation of polyphenols with proteins and polysaccha-
rides. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans II 2(9):1429–1438
Melillo J, Butler S, Johnson J, Mohan J, Steudler P, Lux H,
Burrows E, Bowles F, Smith R, Scott L, Vario C, Hill T,
Burton A, Zhou Y, Tang J (2011) Soil warming, carbon–
nitrogen interactions, and forest carbon budgets. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 8(23):9508–9512
Michaelson GJ, Ping C-L, Kling GW, Hobbie JE (1998) The
character and bioavailability of dissolved organic matter at
thaw and in spring runoff waters of the arctic tundra north
slope. J Geophys Res 103:28939–28946
Michalzik B, Kalbitz K, Park JH, Solinger S, Matzner E (2001)
Fluxes and concentrations of dissolved organic carbon and
nitrogen—a synthesis for temperate forests. Biogeochem-
istry 52:173–205
Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, de Wit HA, Forsius M,
Hogasen T, Wilander A, Skjelkvale BL, Jeffries DS, Vu-
orenmaa J, Keller B, Kopacek J, Vesely J (2007) Dissolved
organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmo-
spheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450:537–540
Moore TR (2003). Dissolved organic carbon in a northern boreal
landscape. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17, 109. doi:10.1029/
2003GB002050
Moore TR, Dalva M (2001) Some controls on the release of
dissolved organic carbon by plant tissues and soils. Soil Sci
166(1):38–47
Moore TR, Pare D, Boutin R (2008) Production of dissolved organic
carbon in Canadian forest soils. Ecosystems 11:740–751
Muller-Wegener U (1988) Interaction of humic substances with
biota. In: Frimmel FH, Christman RF (eds) Humic sub-
stances and their role in the environment. Wiley, New
York, pp 179–192
Munster U, de Haan H (1998) The role of microbial extracellular
enzymes in the transformation of dissolved organic matter
in humic waters. In: Hessen DO, Tranvik LJ (eds) Aquatic
humic substances—ecology and biogeochemistry. Eco-
logical studies 133. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–258
Nannipieri P, Kandeler E, Ruggiero P (2002) Enzyme activities
and microbiological and biochemical processes in soil. In:
Burns RG, Dick RP (eds) Enzymes in the environment.
Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 1–34
Neff JC, Hooper DU (2002) Vegetation and climate controls on
potential CO2, DOC and DON production in northern lat-
itude soils. Glob Chang Biol 8:872–884
Park JH, Kalbitz K, Matzner E (2002) Resource control on the
production of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in a
deciduous forest floor. Soil Biol Biochem 34(6):813–822
Pastor J, Solin J, Bridgham SD, Updegraff K, Harth C, Wei-
shampel P, Dewey B (2003) Global warming and the
export of dissolved organic carbon from boreal peatlands.
Oikos 100(2):380–386
Porcal P, Koprivnjak J-F, Molot LA, Dillon PJ (2009) Humic
substances—part 7: the biogeochemistry of dissolved
organic carbon and its interactions with climate change.
Environ Sci Pollut Res 16:714–726
Preston MD, Eimers MC, Watmough SA (2011) Effect of
moisture and temperature variation on DOC release from a
peatland: conflicting results from laboratory, field and
historical data analysis. Sci Total Environ. doi:10.1016/j.
scitotenv.2010.12.027
Putman AL, Offenberg JH, Fisseha R, Kundu S, Rahn TA,
Mazzoleni LR (2012) Ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR mass
spectrometry characterization of a-pinene ozonolysis SOA.
Atmos Environ Part A 46(1):164–172
Rapalee G, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA, Harden JW, Veldhuis
H (1998) Soil carbon stocks and their rates of accumulation
and loss in a boreal forest landscape. Glob Biogeochem
Cycles 12(4):687–701
Remucal CK, Cory RM, Sander M, McNeill K (2012) Low
molecular weight components in an aquatic humic sub-
stance as characterized by membrane dialysis Orbitrap
mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 46:9350–9359
Roulet N, Moore TR (2006) Environmental chemistry—
browning the waters. Nature 444(7117):283–284
Scott MJ, Jones MN, Woof C, Tipping E (1998) Concentrations
and fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in drainage water
from an upland peat system. Environ Int 24:537–546
Shackle VJ, Freeman C, Reynolds B (2000) Carbon supply and
the regulation of enzyme activity in constructed wetlands.
Soil Biol Biochem 32:1935–1940
Sinsabaugh RL (2010) Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic
matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 42:391–404
Sinsabaugh RL, Reynolds H, Long TM (2000) Rapid assay for
amidohydrolase (urease) activity in environmental sam-
ples. Soil Biol Biochem 32:2095–2097
Sinsabaugh RL, Gallo ME,LauberC, Waldrop MP, ZakDR (2005)
Extracellular enzyme activities and soil organic matter
dynamics for northern hardwood forests receiving simulated
nitrogen deposition. Biogeochemistry 75(2):201–215
Sinsabaugh RL, Lauber CL, Weintraub MN, Ahmed B, Allison
SD, Creshaw C, Contosta AR, Cusack D, Frey S, Gallo
ME, Gartner TB, Hobbie SE, Holland K, Keeler BL,
Powers JS, Stursova M, Takacs-Vesbach C, Waldrop MP,
Wallenstein MD, Zak DR, Zeglin LH (2008) Stoichiometry
of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol Lett 11:
1252–1264
Spencer CM, Cai Y, Martin R, Gaffney SH, Goulding PN,
Magnolato D, Lilley TH, Haslam E (1988) Polyphenol
complexation—some thoughts and observations. Phyto-
chemistry 27:2397–2409
Stenson AC, Marshall AG, Cooper WT (2003) Exact masses and
chemical formulas of individual Suwannee River fulvic
acids from ultrahigh resolution electrospray ionization
Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectra.
Anal Chem 75(6):1275–1284
Strack M, Waddington JM, Bourbonniere RA, Buckton EL,
Shaw K, Whittington P, Price JP (2008) Effect of water
table drawdown on peatland dissolved organic carbon
export and dynamics. Hydrol Process 22:3373–3385
Strack M, Toth K, Bourbonniere R, Waddington JM (2011)
Dissolved organic carbon production and runoff quality
following peatland extraction and restoration. Ecol Eng
37:1998–2008
Sucker C, Krause K (2010) Increasing dissolved organic carbon
concentrations in freshwaters: what is the actual driver?
iForest 3:106–108
Tegen I, Dorr H (1996) Mobilization of cesium in organic rich
soils: correlation with production of dissolved organic
carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 88:133–144
Tfaily MM, Hamdan R, Corbett JE, Chanton JP, Glaser PH,
Cooper WT (2013) Investigating dissolved organic matter
Biogeochemistry
123
decomposition in northern peatlands using complimentary
analytical techniques. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
112:116–129
Thurman EM (1985) Organic geochemistry of natural waters.
Nijhoff/Junk, Boston
Tipping E, Woof C, Rigg E, Harrison AF, Inneson P, Taylor K,
Benham D, Poskitt J, Rowland AP, Bol R, Harkness DD
(1999) Climatic influences on the leaching of dissolved
organic matter from upland UK moorland soils, investi-
gated by a field manipulation experiment. Environ Int
25:83–95
Tranvik LJ, Jansson M (2002) Climate change—terrestrial
export of organic carbon. Nature 415(6874):861–862
Urban NR, Gorham E, Underwood JK, Martin FB, Ogden JG
(1990) Chemical processes controlling concentrations of
Al, Fe, and Mn in Nova Scotia lakes. Limnol Oceanogr
35(7):1516–1534
Urban N, Verry ES, Eisenreich S, Grigal DF, Sebestyen SD
(2011) Element cycling in upland/peatland watersheds. In:
Kolka RK, Sebestyen SD, Verry ES, Brooks KN (eds)
Peatland biogeochemistry and watershed hydrology at the
marcell experimental forest. CRC Press, Boca Raton,
pp 213–243
Visser SA (1983) Application of Van Krevelen’s graphical–
statistical method for the study of aquatic humic material.
Environ Sci Technol 17:412–417
Wallenstein MD, McMahon SK, Schimel JP (2009) Seasonal
variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities
in Arctic tundra soils. Glob Chang Biol 15:1631–1639
Wallenstein M, Allison SD, Ernakovich J, Steinweg JM, Sin-
sabaugh RL (2011) Controls on the temperature sensitivity
of soil enzymes: a key driver of in situ enzyme activity
rates. In: Shukla G, Varma A (eds) Soil enzymology.
Springer, Berlin, pp 245–258
Weishaar JL, Aiken GR, Bergamaschi BA, Fram MS, Fujii R,
Mopper K (2003) Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absor-
bance as an indicator of the chemical composition and
reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ Sci Tech-
nol 37(20):4702–4708
Wickland KP, Neff JC, Aiken GR (2007) Dissolved organic
carbon in Alaskan boreal forest: sources, chemical charac-
teristics, and biodegradability. Ecosystems 10:1323–1340
Worrall F, Burt T, Shedden R (2003) Long term records of
riverine dissolved organic matter. Biogeochemistry
64:165–178
Yallop AR, Clutterbuck B, Thacker J (2010) Increases in humic
dissolved organic carbon export from upland peat catch-
ments: the role of temperature, declining sulphur deposi-
tion and changes in land management. Clim Res. doi:10.
3354/cr00884
Biogeochemistry
123