A shaft is a rotating machine element which is used to transmit p
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems: Out-Gassing and Photosynthesis Transmit Soil δ 13 C...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems: Out-Gassing and Photosynthesis Transmit Soil δ 13 C...
Carbon Cycling in FloodplainEcosystems: Out-Gassing and
Photosynthesis Transmit Soil d13CGradient Through Stream Food Webs
Duncan P. Gray,1* Jon S. Harding,1 Bo Elberling,2 Travis Horton,3
Tim J. Clough,4 and Mike J. Winterbourn1
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand; 2Department of Geographyand Geology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark; 3Department of Geological Sciences,
University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand; 4Agriculture and Life Sciences Division, Lincoln University,
PO Box 84, Canterbury, New Zealand
ABSTRACT
Natural braided river floodplains typically possess
high groundwater–surface water exchange, which
is vital to the overall function and structure of these
complex ecosystems. Spring-fed streams on the
floodplain are also hotspots of benthic invertebrate
diversity and productivity. The sources of carbon
that drive these productive spring-fed systems are
not well-known. We conducted field assessments
and a manipulation, modeling, and a laboratory
experiment to address this issue. Initially d13C
values of both dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC)
and food-web components of five springs were
used to assess the sources of carbon to spring food
webs. Partial pressures of CO2 in upwelling water
ranged from 2 to 7 times atmospheric pressure, but
rapidly approached equilibrium with the atmo-
sphere downstream commensurate with 13C
enrichment of DIC. Speciation modeling and a
laboratory out-gassing experiment suggested that
downstream changes in pH could be explained so-
lely by CO2 out-gassing. However, field results
indicated that both out-gassing and photosynthetic
drawdown by aquatic plants controlled the net flux
of CO2. A whole stream manipulation indicated
out-gassing was the primary effect at the spring
source, which was confirmed by invariant diel pH.
At 1296 m downstream from the spring source a
large diel shift in pH indicated a plant effect on CO2
concentration which would contribute to the
overall downstream gradient in d13C DIC. Within
the first 1296 m the gradient in d13 DIC was
transmitted through three trophic levels of the
spring food web. These findings indicate depen-
dency on groundwater inorganic carbon by spring
stream food webs and strong hydrologically medi-
ated linkages connecting terrestrial, subsurface,
and aquatic components of the floodplain.
Key words: biogeochemistry; connectivity; car-
bon; braided river; food web; stable isotopes; New
Zealand.
Received 13 July 2010; accepted 25 February 2011;
published online 10 March 2011
Author Contributions: DPG conceived the project, designed, and car-
ried out the survey and manipulation, analyzed data, and drafted the
manuscript. JSH contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of
results, and drafts of the manuscript. BE contributed the degassing
experiment, speciation modeling, and contributed to the manuscript. TH
performed the carbon isotope analysis of organic samples and certified
reference materials, contributed to the improvement of the original
manuscript, and assisted in the interpretation of the stable isotopic data.
TJC contributed to the degassing experiment, speciation modeling, and
the manuscript. MJW contributed to the design of the study and inter-
pretation of results, identified aquatic invertebrates and helped prepare
material for isotopic analysis.
*Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]
Ecosystems (2011) 14: 583–597DOI: 10.1007/s10021-011-9430-1
� 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
583
INTRODUCTION
Many natural rivers have extensive flood-plains
that contain diverse habitats. In braided systems,
floodplain habitats are in a state of continual
change (Arscott and others 2000; van der Nat and
others 2003). Floodplains are connected hydrolog-
ically to the river and wider catchment (Brunke
and Gonser 1997; Ward and others 1999; Woessner
2000) with both spatial and temporal variability in
groundwater–surface water exchange (Stanford
and Ward 1993; Brunke and Gonser 1997; Poole
2002). Feedback loops and interactions between
habitats and the wider catchment, have been in-
ferred (Hynes 1975; Stanford 1998; Wiens 2002)
and links between aquatic and terrestrial systems,
hydrology and ecology, and among organisms
across habitat boundaries have been demonstrated
(Fisher and others 2004; Paetzold and others 2005;
Malard and others 2006; Tockner and others 2006).
As a result, Hynes’ (1975) assertion that the
‘‘stream is ruled by its Valley’’ has received re-
newed attention.
Early biogeochemical studies of streams focused
on small, forested headwater ecosystems and con-
sequently on the sources and dynamics of organic
carbon in heterotrophic food webs (Fisher and
Likens 1973). Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC)
provides the basis of autotrophic aquatic food webs
in streams with adequate sunlight for photosyn-
thesis (Raven and others 1985; Sand-Jensen and
Frost-Christensen 1998). From an ecosystem per-
spective the distinction between organic and inor-
ganic carbon may be misleading as the two are
interchangeable through the metabolic processes of
respiration and photosynthesis (Shibata and others
2001). Although hydrologists and geochemists are
aware of the biological controls acting upon DIC in
streams (Clark and Fritz 1997; Jones and Mulhol-
land 1998; Telmer and Veizer 1999; Doctor and
others 2008), there is limited biological research on
the connections between DIC and in-stream eco-
logical patterns. That DIC may be the primary
source of carbon to a stream food web and that the
sources of that DIC are varied and complex has
been inferred (Finlay 2003; Hawke and Polaschek
2005). However, few studies have identified and
traced the signature of d13C DIC through a stream
food web (Rounick and James 1984; Finlay 2004;
Jepsen and Winemiller 2007).
In streams, the amount of inorganic carbon
available to primary producers is dictated by the
balance between atmospheric diffusion, in-stream
metabolism, and groundwater inorganic carbon
inputs when present (Allan and Castillo 2007).
Diffusion to the atmosphere results in a shift in the
CO2(aq) concentration of water towards that of the
atmosphere (ca. 387 ll l-1), whereas in-stream
metabolism will either increase or decrease CO2(aq)
concentration depending on the balance between
photosynthesis and respiration (Fisher and Likens
1973). Groundwater is generally supersaturated
with CO2 due to soil respiration within the catch-
ment (Dawson and others 1995; Jones and Mul-
holland 1998) and in the Sleepers River watershed,
Vermont, USA, partial pressure of carbon dioxide
(PCO2) was 4–74 times that of the atmosphere
(Doctor and others 2008).
The isotopic evolution of DIC begins with disso-
lution of atmospheric CO2 (d13C � -8& V-PDB)
by meteoric water. DIC is generally depleted in 13C
relative to the atmosphere due, in part, to the
addition of CO2 from soil respiration. The isotopic
composition of soil derived CO2, in turn depends
on the photosynthetic pathway of the predominant
surface vegetation. The C3 metabolic pathway for
carbon fixation in photosynthesis operates in about
85% of plant species and predominates in most
terrestrial ecosystems (Clark and Fritz 1997). Most
C3 plants have d13C values that range from -24 to
-30& with an average value of about -27&
(Clark and Fritz 1997). Photosynthetically fixed
carbon in the form of vegetative matter accumu-
lates within soils where aerobic bacteria convert
the majority back to CO2, resulting in soil CO2
concentrations 10–100 times greater than in the
atmosphere (Elberling and Ladegaard-Pedersen
2005). Microbial and plant root respired CO2 have
the same d13C value as the source vegetation,
although out-gassing from soils may result in iso-
topic enrichment in excess of 4& (Cerling and
others 1991; Aravena and others 1992, but see
Davidson 1995). Therefore, the d13C of aerobic soils
and soil water DIC in C3 dominated landscapes,
such as New Zealand, can be expected to be
approximately -23& ± 3. A further addition to
soil and groundwater DIC comes from bicarbonate
(HCO3-) ions derived from bedrock weathering.
Carbonate dissolution by carbonic acid produces a
d13C DIC value intermediate between that of soil
CO2 and the carbonate source, whereas HCO3-
derived from silicate weathering will be 7–10&
greater (more enriched) than the d13C value of soil
CO2 (Kendall and others 1992; Pawellek and Veizer
1994). The d13C value of most carbonates is
approximately 0& V-PBD (Craig 1953; Taylor and
Fox 1996). d13C DIC values of groundwater inor-
ganic carbon more negative than those of surface
water have been reported in numerous studies (for
584 D. P. Gray and others
example, Finlay 2003; Doctor and others 2008) and
suggest that groundwater CO2 is likely to have an
influence on surface streams in many systems with
high groundwater–surface water exchange.
Because spring-fed streams on floodplains are
hotspots of benthic invertebrate diversity and pro-
ductivity (Gray and Harding 2009) the question
arises as to what energy pathways support them?
The primary objective of our study was to investi-
gate the importance of groundwater carbon to
floodplain spring food webs. The study was con-
ducted in three parts. First, an investigation of
multiple sites along five spring streams was made to
determine the nature and consistency of ground-
water carbon contributions to spring stream food
webs. This was followed by a laboratory based out-
gassing experiment and speciation modeling to in-
fer the degree to which downstream trends in pH
could be explained by the flux of CO2. Finally,
continuous diel measurements of pH and a whole
stream manipulation of five additional springs were
performed to investigate the relative effects of out-
gassing and photosynthesis on the longitudinal
gradient identified in part one.
METHODS
Site Selection
All spring streams (except one on the West Coast)
were located within the floodplains of braided rivers
in Canterbury, New Zealand, at altitudes between
515 and 1000 m a.s.l. (Figure 1). These catchments
were within the Torlesse Terrane that comprises
quartzofeldspathic sandstones and mudstones with
subsidiary conglomerates (Anekant and others
2004). The area occupies an orographic rain ‘‘sha-
dow’’ produced by the prevailing ‘‘westerly’’ air
flow. Consequently, whilst study sites and sur-
rounding terrestrial habitats may experience con-
siderable aridity, the alpine sourced rivers of which
they are a part are subject to frequent and extreme
flooding (Winterbourn 1997).
Initially, five floodplain spring streams were se-
lected as replicate sites to assess the response of
stream ecosystems to groundwater carbon inputs.
The streams were located in the Hawdon Valley,
2 km upstream of the Sudden Valley Stream con-
fluence, at 600 m a.s.l.; at Manuka Point in the
Rakaia Valley, at 600 m a.s.l.; at Mount Potts in the
Rangitata Valley, 550 m a.s.l.; below Mt Joseph in
the Fork Stream, a tributary of the Tekapo River,
1000 m a.s.l., and below Mt Glen Lyon in the
Hopkins Valley, 600 m a.s.l. Five sampling sites
were established along each stream at distances of
0, 6, 36, 216, and 1296 m from the source. The
streams flowed for at least 1.5 km through tussock
grassland and no forest patches were present. In an
attempt to avoid the influence of methanogenesis
or sulfur bacteria, which might have depleted d13C
values of biota and DIC, no streams were in close
proximity to swamps or standing water (Jones and
Mulholland 1998). However, we cannot com-
pletely discount chemoautotrophic bacterial path-
ways which have been identified in predominantly
aerobic freshwater systems (Trimmer and others
2009; Doi and others 2006). Streams were sampled
in September 2008.
Another five spring streams fulfilling the same
criteria as those described above were chosen for
the manipulation of out-gassing and photosynthe-
sis. We decided to use five novel springs to further
test the commonality of the pattern. A 36 m long
reach starting at the spring source was used.
Figure 1. Location of the five spring streams included in
the initial survey in September 2008 (closed circles) and
springs used in the whole stream manipulation of out-
gassing and photosynthesis in April 2009 (closed triangles).
Symbols are superimposed on outlines of major river
floodplains. Inset: location of the study area within New
Zealand.
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 585
Reaches had no inflowing tributaries and were
located within the Rakaia, Waimakariri, and Tar-
amakau river floodplains (Figure 1). The manipu-
lation was carried out in April 2009.
Sample Collection and ExperimentalDesign
For the longitudinal study, spot water chemistry
samples, and data were collected at each of the five
sites along each of the five streams. Water samples
for the analysis of DIC were collected in autoclaved
250 ml, Nalgene bottles from well-mixed areas of
the stream during mid-morning through mid-
afternoon. Bottles were rinsed three times in
stream water, filled and capped underwater to en-
sure that no head space remained in the bottle.
Samples were immediately put on ice, in the dark,
and returned to the laboratory within 24 h and
refrigerated. Samples were couriered to the Geo-
logical and Nuclear Sciences Stable Isotope Labo-
ratory, Wellington and stored in a refrigerator for
5 days at 4�C, before analysis. Water samples were
reacted with 85% phosphoric acid at room tem-
perature, and CO2 was extracted and purified to be
run on a Europa Geo 20–20 mass spectrometer in
dual inlet mode. All results are reported with re-
spect to VPDB, normalized to a single internal so-
dium carbonate water standard with reported
values of -5.6& for d13C. The external precision
for these measurements is 0.1& for d13C. The car-
bon concentration in mg C kg-1 of water was cal-
culated from the measured CO2 pressures. DOC
concentrations were estimated using the spectro-
photometric method of Collier (1987). Tempera-
ture (�C) and conductivity (lS25 cm-1) were
measured with a calibrated Oakton conductivity/
temperature 10 meter and dissolved oxygen with a
YSI 550 meter. Measurements of water pH were
made with a Solstat FET pH meter and glass elec-
trode with re-calibration before each measure-
ment. Stream discharge was assessed across three
transects by measuring wetted width, depth, and
velocity determined with a Marsh-McBirney flow
meter. Percentage macrophyte/filamentous algae
cover and proportions of pools, riffles, and runs in
the reach upstream of each site were estimated,
visually. Altitude was measured using a Trimble
Recon GPS XC unit and used to calculate average
slope between sites. Finally, air temperature was
recorded at each site using a Center 300 Type K
thermometer. Subsequent continuous measure-
ments of pH were made in the Hawdon Valley
spring using an in situ YSI 6600 multi-parameter
water quality monitor.
Samples of submerged bryophytes, macrophytes,
and filamentous algae were collected mid-stream
for isotopic analysis to reduce the likelihood that
plants had been exposed to the atmosphere during
low flow. Emergent macrophytes and bryophytes
were not collected. Biofilms were scrubbed from
more than four stones using a tooth brush and
aquatic invertebrates were collected with a kick-
net. Where present the leptophlebiid mayfly Dele-
atidium and the hydrobiid snail Potamopyrgus anti-
podarum (primary consumers), predatory caddisfly
larvae, Hydrobiosis and Psilochorema (Hydrobiosi-
dae), and the predatory stonefly Stenoperla were
collected. When these taxa were not available
other members of the appropriate consumer guild
were collected: primary consumers included a
mayfly Nesameletus, two stoneflies, Austroperla and
Zelandoperla and the caddisflies Pycnocentria and
Olinga; predatory invertebrates were a stonefly
Megaleptoperla and three caddisflies Philoreithrus,
Hudsonema, and Polyplectropus. Predatory fish were
captured with a Kainga EFM 300 backpack elec-
trofishing machine (NIWA Instrument Systems,
N.Z.). The native galaxiids, Galaxias paucispondylus
and G. vulgaris were obtained where possible but, at
some sites salmonids (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Salmo
trutta,) or bullies (Gobiomorphus breviceps) were
collected. Lastly, riparian fishing spiders (Dolomedes
aquaticus), which have been shown to derive
greater than 90% of their diet from aquatic insects
(Williams 1979), were collected from each site.
Spiders were found beneath overhanging tussocks
directly adjacent to the stream. All organic samples
were held on ice in the dark, returned to the lab-
oratory within 24 h and frozen at -20�C.
The out-gassing and photosynthesis stream
manipulation used a different method for the
measurement of DIC. Vacuum sealed 12 ml Exe-
tainers� were opened beneath the surface of the
water to avoid ambient air contamination. Filled
vials were kept on ice before saturated sodium
azide was added prior to shipping to the University
of California Davis (USA) stable isotope laboratory.
Samples were analyzed using a Sercon Trace Gas
system interfaced to a PDZ Europa 20–20 IRMS.
Raw data were normalized using a single-point
additive correction based on replicate analysis of
lithium carbonate (LSVEC) with a d13C of
-46.7& ± 0.07; n = 8.
To test the relative effects of out-gassing and
photosynthetic uptake of CO2(aq) on d13C DIC, a
fully factorial manipulation in five springs was
performed. Initially, water chemistry measure-
ments and water samples were collected from the
source of each stream and at 6, 16, and 36 m
586 D. P. Gray and others
downstream. To inhibit out-gassing, but not pho-
tosynthesis, a sheet of transparent polythene was
laid over the first 36 m of each stream. Once a
satisfactory seal had been achieved and all gas
pockets had been minimized, the sheet was left in
place for 1 h to ensure that all pre-manipulation
water had left the reach. Water sampling was then
repeated at each point. The polythene sheet was
then removed and all macrophytes, bryophytes,
and algal mats were removed from the reach;
substrates with obvious diatom layers were either
removed or inverted. The streams were then left for
a further 1 h before re-sampling. The polythene
sheet was then put in place again and a final set of
water samples taken after 1 h. After each sample
collection the residence time of water in each reach
was estimated using a fluorescein dye tracer.
Water samples for chemical speciation modeling
and controlled out-gassing were collected from the
Hawdon Valley spring because of access issues at
other sites during high summer flows. Samples
were collected at mid-depth using gas-tight 130 ml
glass bottles, and transported to Lincoln University
stable isotope laboratory, New Zealand, for carbon
and isotope analysis, and to the Soil–Water
Chemical Laboratory, Department of Geography
and Geology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
for metal analysis. Total dissolved Fe2+, Fe3+, Al3+,
Mn2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, and Na+ were determined on
acidified water samples (10% HNO3) by atomic
absorption spectrophotometry (AAS). Concentra-
tions of Cl-, NO3-
, and SO42- were measured using
an ion chromatograph in one determination
(Dionex Ionpac AS14 4 mm column and CD20
conductivity detector). Replicate samples were
interspersed with standards and indicated a preci-
sion better than 4%.
In the laboratory a controlled degassing experi-
ment was performed to quantify the importance of
CO2 out-gassing on changes in pH and d13C DIC.
Initially, a 2 ml water sample was taken from a
sealed bottle via a septum. This water was injected
into a pre-evacuated 12 ml Exetainer� pre-purged
with helium. The dissolved CO2 was allowed to
equilibrate with the He headspace for 24 h, prior to
d13C analysis. After the first water sample had been
taken the remaining water was decanted into a
200 ml beaker and stirred constantly whilst at a
temperature of 18 ± 1�C. Water pH was measured
on 12 occasions during the 1200 min degassing
experiment, with further water samples taken from
the beaker at the time of every 2nd pH measurement
for d13C DIC analysis. Isotopic analysis was per-
formed using a PDZ Europa 20/20 TG11-CF/IRMS.
All results were corrected for linearity and normal-
ized to the V-PDB scale using two in-house gas
standards (-8.13& ± 0.03 and -38.57& ± 0.07)
supplied by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography
(La Jolla, CA 92093-0244, USA) and calibrated
against the international standard NBS-19. All
measurements were replicated three times.
Organic Sample Preparationand Analysis
Bryophytes, macrophytes, and filamentous algae
were rinsed to remove contaminant material. Guts
of all aquatic invertebrates and riparian spiders
were removed where possible. Although the ceph-
alothorax and leg coxae of Dolomedes aquaticus may
contain stored food materials, Collier and others
(2002) found no significant difference in d13C val-
ues between them and legs minus coxae; therefore,
we combined all lower leg and cephalothorax
material in samples. Snails were removed from their
shells prior to isotope analysis. This can be achieved
either through manual extraction of soft tissues or
by dissolving the shell in HCl. The two techniques
were compared and no effect of HCl was found on
d13C values (P = 0.993). However, d15N values for
material treated with HCl were significantly lower
(P = 0.01) and manual extraction was used there-
after. All organic material was dried at 45�C for at
least 48 h before grinding with a mortar and pestle.
Because endogenous lipids have more depleted
d13C values than other major compounds, their
presence can affect conclusions drawn from d13C
analyses in food web studies (Logan and others
2008). Therefore, lipids were extracted from all
samples as described by Logan and others (2008).
Samples were then re-dried at 45�C for at least 48 h
and frozen at -80�C prior to isotope analysis. Val-
ues of d13C were determined using continuous flow
IRMS in the Stable Isotope Laboratory, University of
Canterbury. Samples were combusted at 1050�C in
a Costech ECS 4010 elemental analyzer and the
CO2 was injected into a Thermo Delta V Plus IRMS
via a Conflo III gas interface. Values of d13C were
normalized to the V-PDB scale based on replicate
analyses of certified primary reference materials
(IAEA-CH-3; NBS-22; USGS24) for each analytical
sequence. Analytical precision for all samples was
better than 0.15& V-PDB.
Estimations and Statistical Analyses
Excess PCO2
The partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) in
water samples was estimated using the relationship
given by Doctor and others (2008):
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 587
CTa0
KH¼ PCO2 ð1Þ
where CT is the total DIC concentration (mol C l-1)
of the sample, a0 is the ionization fraction between
CO2 and H2CO3 (Stumm and Morgan 1981), and KH
is the Henry’s law equilibrium constant for CO2 in
water. Because KH is temperature dependent, the
value was estimated from the temperature of the
stream at the time of sample collection using the
relationships provided in Telmer and Veizer (1999).
Excess PCO2 (ePCO2) is the ratio of the calculated
value of PCO2 in the sample to that of the atmo-
sphere, which was assumed to be 387 ll l-1.
Food Web Components and Water Chemis-try Relationships between water chemistry vari-
ables, d13C DIC, d13C of food web components and
distance downstream from the source were assessed
using mixed effects linear models. Mixed models
were used to remove variation contributed by ran-
dom, higher level effects (stream), before assessing
patterns due to fixed variables. To test for homo-
geneity of slopes between significant food web
components and DIC we used a mixed effects linear
model ANCOVA. The d13C value of filamentous
algae and distance were log10 transformed to im-
prove normality and homogeneity of variances.
Quantification of Carbon Utilization Methods to
partition the sources of carbon in stable isotope
studies center around the use of mixing models
(Rasmussen 2010). To separate contributions of
terrestrial organic carbon from groundwater inor-
ganic carbon we have used a gradient based model,
which produces estimates of the proportion of ter-
restrial consumption (pT) from signature slopes of
consumers (Rasmussen 2010). The d13C value of
inorganic carbon and most autochthonous pro-
duction exhibit pronounced gradients along rivers
relative to terrestrial signatures, which exhibit no
gradient. Terrestrial food consumption therefore
reduces the downstream d13C signature slope of
consumers in proportion to the amount of terres-
trial food consumed.
Downstream Patterns of DIC Mixed model anal-
ysis was also used to test the importance of different
physico-chemical variables on downstream
enrichment of d13C DIC. The following transfor-
mations were made; slope (degrees) and ePCO2
were log10 transformed, whereas upstream per-
centage macrophyte cover and percentage riffle
were arcsine square root transformed to improve
patterns of normality and heteroscedasticity.
Stream Out-Gassing and Photosynthesis Manipu-lation The effect of whole stream manipulations
on d13C of DIC was assessed using mixed effects
linear models. Values of d13C DIC, standardized to
the value at source of each stream, were used as the
response to control for variable stream source val-
ues. The change in residence time of water along
each reach as a result of macrophyte removal was
used as the stream level random factor. Significant
differences during mixed effects linear modeling
were identified using ANOVA and P values. All
analyses were conducted in R using the package
‘‘lme4’’ (R Development Core Team 2007).
Experimental Out-Gassing and Speciation Model-ing Modeling CO2 equilibrium requires calcula-
tions of ion activities from concentrations and mass
balance equations. The computer program PHRE-
EQE was used to calculate geochemical equilibrium
based on thermodynamic data given for tempera-
tures between 1 and 100�C (Parkhurst and others
1990). Input data for simulations included con-
centrations of dissolved chemical elements; Fe2+,
Fe3+, Mg2+, Al3+, Mn2+, Ca2+, K+, Na+, Cl-, NO3-,
SO42-, total inorganic carbon, H+, and tempera-
ture. Activity coefficient calculations were per-
formed with the Davies (1962) approximation,
valid for ionic strengths below 0.1 M. The maxi-
mum ionic strength for these water samples was
below 0.05 M and the Davies approach is therefore
appropriate. PHREEQE has been used in a similar
way by Serrano and others (2000) and by Elberling
and Matthiesen (2007) for evaluating CO2 degas-
sing. In our study the speciation model was not
calibrated but validated against observed pH values.
RESULTS
Longitudinal Study
The five spring streams were characterized by
broadly similar physico-chemical conditions. Dis-
charge increased rapidly from the initial spring
source, but generally plateaued approximately
200 m downstream. An exception was Mount Potts
stream, which joined a large spring at 800 m. The
rapid increases in discharge indicate that ground-
water inputs continued, at least in the upper 200 m
of the streams.
Water temperature at spring sources (6.4–9�C)
was similar to the annual average air temperature
of the sites (Gray and others 2006). pH was circum-
neutral and conductivity was low and relatively
constant (range 39–97 lS25 cm-1) along the length
588 D. P. Gray and others
of each stream (Table 1). Water at the spring
sources was not saturated with oxygen (range 76–
94%) but became saturated downstream (101–
108%). DOC concentrations were low, and at some
spring sources were below the detection level of
1.6 g m-3. All streams flowed across river flats and
therefore slopes were low. Spring sources were
typically pools with a high percentage of macro-
phyte cover (mean 56% SD 15.2), which declined
to a mean of 0.7% (SD 0.12) at the downstream
sites as current velocity increased. Both tempera-
ture and pH increased logarithmically downstream
(Figure 2). DIC concentration (mmol kg-1) de-
clined logarithmically with distance downstream,
except at the lowest site on the Hopkins Valley
stream (Figure 2). Between this site and the sam-
pling site immediately upstream, discharge more
than doubled in the absence of tributaries sug-
gesting considerable input of up-welling ground-
water. Groundwater may therefore have provided
the high quantities of DIC measured at the lower
site. Before exclusion of this data point no signifi-
cant relationship was found between DIC concen-
tration and distance downstream (P = 0.28), but
when the point was removed a significant decline
in DIC concentration was found (P = 0.003). The
ePCO2 at spring sources ranged from 2 to 7 times
atmospheric pressure, but was invariably less than
1.5 at the downstream sites. DIC became more
enriched in 13C downstream (Figure 2). Although
the same general pattern was observed in all
streams, actual d13C values ranged from -15.6 to
-12.2& at sources and from -12.5 to -9.0&
1296 m downstream.
The d13C of biofilms, moss, primary consumers,
invertebrate predators, and fish all showed signifi-
cant positive relationships with d13C DIC (Fig-
ure 3). Thus, multiple trophic levels of the spring
food web tracked the rapid downstream enrich-
ment of d13C DIC. However, a non-significant
relationship was found for filamentous algae when
an outlier, that may have been exposed to atmo-
spheric CO2 was included (P = 0.4), although a
significant positive relationship was obtained when
the outlier was excluded (P < 0.001). The only
food web components not related to d13C DIC were
macrophytes and riparian spiders.
A recent study in forested temperate systems has
shown that fractionation effects on algal d13C were
equal to or more substantial than the effect of
variation in d13C DIC suggesting that patterns
transmitted through the food web might in fact be
driven by CO2 concentration, rather than the iso-
topic value of source inorganic carbon (Finlay
2004). However, regressions between 1/CO2 and
fractionation (as in Finlay 2004, equ. 2) between
d13C of DIC and primary producers in our streams
were all non-significant. CO2 concentration did not
appear to have a primary influence on the extent of
isotopic fractionation during aquatic photosynthe-
sis in the streams studied. However, we did not
analyze individual algal species, thus we cannot
exclude an algal fractionation effect.
Gradient based mixing models allowed for the
partitioning of autochthonous and allochthonous
contributions to the d13C signatures of stream biota
(Table 2). The value of pT calculated for biofilm was
0.41 indicating approximately 41% allochthonous
content. Invertebrate predators and fish utilized a
slightly greater proportion of terrestrial carbon in
their diets, potentially indicative of the consump-
tion of terrestrially derived prey. Fishing spiders
derived 70% of their carbon from terrestrial sour-
ces. Overall, the results indicated a considerable
influence of inorganic groundwater carbon on the
food webs of these spring streams.
Table 1. Physico-Chemical Characteristics Along Five Spring Streams Sampled in September 2008
All sites Source Lowest site
Mean Range Range Range
pH 7.0–8.0 7.0–7.5 7.6–8.0
Temperature (�C) 7.9 6.4–11.2 6.4–9.0 7.3–11.2
Conductivity (lS25 cm-1) 57 39–97 41–65 39–80
Dissolved oxygen (% saturation) 95 76–112 76–94 101–108
DOC (g m-3) 2.18 0–3.2 0–2.6 1.9–3.2
Average slope (degrees) 1.6 0–13 0 0.37–1
Up-stream macrophyte cover (%) 31 0.5–90 15–90 0.5–1
Up-stream riffle (%) 37.0 0–90 0–5 30–90
Air temperature (�C) 15.2 9.1–20.3 na na
Hawdon Valley sites are included in this data set. pH values are only shown as a range. Up-stream macrophyte and riffle values are for the stream reach directly above each site.
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 589
To identify downstream drivers of d13C DIC we
compared gradients to physico-chemical descriptors
of the stream. Both macrophyte cover (P = 0.005)
and ePCO2 (P < 0.001) showed a significant rela-
tionship with d13C DIC. In plots of ePCO2 and
up-stream macrophyte cover versus d13C DIC
(Figure 4) regression lines for ePCO2 and d13C DIC
were similar for all streams except Fork stream.
Isotopic enrichment of DIC along Fork stream was
comparable to that at the other streams, but ePCO2
at the source was only twice that of the atmo-
sphere, and decreased by only one unit over
1296 m. Regressions lines for macrophyte cover
versus DIC d13C were all broadly similar suggesting
that macrophyte cover may be the controlling
variable. Collinearity between predictor variables
Figure 2. Downstream
gradients of pH,
temperature, DIC
concentration, excess
partial pressure of CO2
(ePCO2), and d13C DIC in
five spring streams
(mean ± 1SE). Means
and error bars were not
calculated for pH. Water
samples from Hawdon
Valley springs were
partially frozen during
storage resulting in gas
head formation.
Consequently, these
samples were omitted
from DIC analyses. The
excluded outlier of DIC
concentration from the
lower Hopkins Valley site
is shown as asterisk.
Significance of the
relationship between log
distance and water
chemistry variables are
shown after testing with
mixed effects linear
models with stream as the
random effect.
590 D. P. Gray and others
Figure 3. Relationships
between d13C of food web
components sampled
along five spring streams
and d13C DIC. Plots are
real data, but trend lines
and P values are derived
from mixed effects linear
models with stream as
random factor. The
outlier in the plot of
filamentous algae versus
d13C DIC is shown as
asterisk. Mixed effects
ANCOVA indicated no
significant difference
between the slopes of
each significant line (df
11, X2 = 5.779, P = 0.2).
Table 2. Linear Regression Parameters and Associated Mixing Model Estimates of the Proportion of Ter-restrial Carbon Consumption (pT) by Components of the Spring Biota
Consumer/resource Slope (±SE) Intercept (±SE) r2 RMA slope pT
Invert. consumer/biofilm 0.49 (±0.08) -17.61 (±2.21) 0.69 0.59 0.41
Invert. predator/biofilm 0.34 (±0.11) -20.63 (±2.99) 0.39 0.56 0.44
Fish/biofilm 0.75 (±0.13) -21.14 (±2.89) 0.29 0.52 0.48
Spiders/biofilm 0.17 (±0.06) -21.77 (±1.75) 0.34 0.3 0.7
After Rasmussen (2010). pT is estimated from the slope of the consumer–resource signature relationship.
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 591
was moderate (VIF = 1.5–3.2) (Quinn and Keough
2002). Percentage upstream cover of macrophytes
was significantly related to ePCO2 (r = 0.621) and
the percentage of riffle habitat (r = -0.654). Due to
this collinearity these analyses were not able to
disentangle the effects of macrophyte cover and
ePCO2 on downstream patterns of DIC d13C.
Stream Out-Gassing and PhotosynthesisManipulation
After controlling for between-stream effects (stan-
dardization) and within-stream changes in water
residence time due to the manipulation (random
factor), a negative shift in d13C DIC due to both
out-gassing and photosynthetic uptake of CO2 was
observed (Table 3). However, only out-gassing had
a significant effect on d13C DIC along the initial
36 m of the streams.
Experimental Out-Gassing andSpeciation Modeling
We observed an increase in pH from 6.9 to 7.6 and
a shift in d13C DIC values from -21.7 to -15.1 as
water de-gassed over 1200 min (Figure 5). The
steady state pH value based on speciation modeling
was 7.68. This value indicated that steady state had
almost been reached after 1200 min, and that the
shift in pH along the spring streams could be ex-
plained solely by degassing of CO2. The large dis-
crepancy between d13C DIC of spring source water
collected during this out-gassing experiment and
that taken during the initial survey is, we believe, a
seasonal effect. The initial survey was performed
during early spring when soils were cold and pre-
cipitation levels low, whereas the de-gassing
experiment was carried out during summer when
soils were warm and precipitation higher. Elevated
summer temperatures increase levels of respiration
and CO2 production in soils. Subsequent precipi-
tation events flush this CO2 into the groundwater
system (Keifer and Amey 1992; Davidson and
Janssens 2006). We have insufficient data to fur-
ther investigate this phenomenon.
Diel Patterns of pH
Speciation modeling indicated that pH was an
appropriate proxy variable for CO2 content of water
and consequently d13C DIC in these streams. Con-
tinuous monitoring at the spring source over a
3 day period revealed an almost constant pH with a
maximum value of 6.94 and an amplitude of 0.03
(Figure 6). Thus, it seems that plants were not
having a significant effect on the quantity or d13C
of DIC at the spring source. However, 1296 m
downstream from the source maximum pH was
8.26 and amplitude was 0.93. During daylight the
increase in stream pH above that dictated by out-
gassing was the result of uptake of CO2 by plants
for photosynthesis. At night, photosynthesis ceased
and there was a net addition of CO2 to the stream
from respiration, potentially offsetting the effects of
out-gassing. Our finding confirms the predomi-
nance of out-gassing close to the spring source, but
indicates a strong effect of photosynthesis and res-
piration by aquatic plants in downstream reaches.
DISCUSSION
Our study showed that the d13C gradient trans-
mitted through the spring stream food web was the
result of both physical out-gassing and photosyn-
thetic uptake of CO2 from the water. The average
d13C value of DIC at spring sources was -12.7&
suggesting that DIC was a combination of C3
derived CO2 and HCO3- derived from mineral
Figure 4. Relationships between d13C DIC, excess partial pressure of carbon dioxide (ePCO2) and percentage upstream
cover of macrophytes (arcsine square root transformed) in individual streams (real data). The r2 values for individual
regressions are shown below each plot. Hawdon Valley data are excluded.
592 D. P. Gray and others
dissolution by carbonic acid. The spring stream food
webs appeared to be autochthonous-based. The
unusual isotopic depletion of carbon fixed within
spring streams permitted the inference that bio-
logical communities were dependent upon CO2
derived from the respiration of soil organisms in the
catchment of the spring.
Drivers of Downstream d13C Enrichment
A number of studies have suggested that carbon
(isotope) exchange with atmospheric CO2
(d13C � -8&) can be partially responsible for
downstream enrichment of d13C DIC values of
water (Taylor and Fox 1996; Yang and others 1996;
Atekwana and Krishnamurthy 1998; Karim and
Veizer 2000; Helie and others 2002; Kanduc and
others 2007). These studies compared headwaters
with lower reaches of large rivers and showed that
headwaters were relatively depleted in d13C DIC.
Doctor and others (2008) pointed out that where
CO2(aq) out-gassing occurs, isotopic equilibrium
between CO2(aq) and atmospheric CO2 can only be
attained after chemical equilibrium has been
reached (that is, an ePCO2 of 1). Therefore, when a
chemical potential for CO2(aq) evasion exists
(ePCO2 > 1) the isotopic signature of DIC will be
regulated predominantly by out-gassing. Isotopic
enrichment of 13C DIC occurs as HCO3- is con-
verted to CO2 to maintain the ionic balance as H+
declines (Hendy 1971; Doctor and others 2008). In
the groundwater dominated streams of our study,
partial pressures of CO2 were in excess of atmo-
spheric pressure at the majority of sites. Only the
lower sites on the Hopkins Valley and Mt Potts
streams had reached chemical equilibrium and
might therefore have begun to be influenced,
Table 3. Linear Mixed Effects Model Tested with Maximum Likelihood Estimation to Investigate the Mainand Interactive Effects of the Prevention of Out-Gassing and Removal of Macrophytes (Fixed CategoricalVariables) on the Downstream Shift in d13C of DIC
Predictors Type var. X2 df P value
Stream Random 0.22463
Gas Treatment 6.7641 2 0.03
Macrophyte Treatment 2.0492 2 0.35
Distance Covariate 13.143 1 <0.001
Gas:macrophyte Treatment interaction 1.1533 3 0.76
This analysis accounted for stream specific change in residence time of water due to the removal of macrophytes (random effect) and the stream specific variation in d13C DIC atsource (response = standardized d13C DIC). We used model simplification to estimate the Chi square (X2) statistic and its significance level (P value) for each fixed effect and theirinteraction. Var. = variance explained by the random block effect. P values < 0.05 are indicated in bold.
Figure 5. Gradients in Hawdon spring water chemistry
during the laboratory de-gassing experiment. A Changes
in d13C DIC over time (error bars equal 1SD), B changes
in pH over time (the horizontal dashed line refers to the
steady state pH calculated by PHREEQE).
Figure 6. Diel measurements of pH taken at 5 min
intervals at 1296 m downstream and at the source of the
Hawdon Valley spring between 15 and 18 January and
15 and 18 February 2010, respectively.
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 593
isotopically by exchange of CO2 with the atmo-
sphere. In both streams d13C DIC was still depleted
relative to the atmosphere (-11.2 and -12.45&,
respectively) suggesting that any downstream (be-
low �1296 m) enrichment might be partly due to
mixing between-stream DIC and atmospheric CO2.
Doctor and others (2008) reported a positive shift
in d13C DIC of between 1 and 4& over tens of
meters downstream from a spring source and
attributed it to out-gassing of CO2 due to the ab-
sence of any significant photosynthetic activity. In
contrast, Hellings and others (2001) observed sea-
sonal enrichment in the order of 4–7& d13C DIC in
a highly polluted estuary and attributed it to
CO2(aq) drawdown by phytoplankton. Numerous
other studies of freshwater rivers and lakes, as well
as brackish and saline habitats, have observed a
positive correlation between photosynthetic rate
and d13C DIC (Barth and Veizer 1999; Bontes and
others 2006; Wachniew 2006; Trojanowska and
others 2008). The spring sources in our study were
dominated by the macrophyte Callitriche stagnalis,
which formed a thick mat covering the water sur-
face. Madsen (1991) showed that Callitriche copho-
carpa in Danish streams depended upon CO2(aq)
over-saturation for a sufficient supply of carbon
and a similar phenomenon might explain the
plant’s affinity for up-welling zones. In contrast,
other macrophyte taxa use morphological and
physiological adaptations (for example, the finely
dissected leaves of Myriophyllum), to increase effi-
ciency of carbon uptake, or use C4 or CAM pho-
tosynthetic pathways (Madsen 1991). Results from
Fork stream in this study suggest that macrophytes
may play an important role in regulating d13C DIC
enrichment, as isotopic enrichment equivalent to
that seen in the other streams took place in the
absence of a comparable gradient in ePCO2. Inter-
estingly, no Callitriche was seen in Fork stream,
possibly due to its low ePCO2, although a sub-
stantial cover of filamentous algae, bryophytes, and
Myriophyllum was present.
The whole stream manipulation of out-gassing
and photosynthetic uptake of CO2(aq) indicated that
close to spring sources out-gassing was the major
driver of downstream d13C enrichment. Hendy
(1971) suggested that isotopic fractionation of DIC
due to CO2(aq) out-gassing should be significant
when ePCO2 is greater than twice that of the
atmosphere. During our manipulations ePCO2
ranged from 4.5 to 8.9 and at all points in the
experimental reach there would have been a strong
chemical drive for CO2(aq) evasion, which over-
whelmed plant effects. De-gassing of Hawdon Val-
ley spring water in the laboratory suggested that all
downstream trends in pH and d13C DIC values
could be explained largely by CO2 de-gassing con-
sistent with the findings of Doctor and others
(2008). However, the incorporation of groundwa-
ter carbon into stream food webs indicates that
photosynthetic uptake of CO2(aq) does occur. At the
spring source, invariance of diel pH indicated no
change in the quantity of CO2(aq) as a result of plant
metabolism. However, 1296 m downstream in the
Hawdon spring stream we observed a large diel
shift in pH attributable to the metabolic activity of
aquatic plants. In the laboratory, in the absence of
photosynthesis, modeled and actual pH of Hawdon
spring water at steady state with the atmosphere
were 7.68 and 7.62, respectively. However, peak
daytime pH in the spring was 8.2. Thus, photo-
synthetic uptake can be expected to have an
increasing influence on CO2(aq) and d13C DIC with
increasing distance from the point of upwelling.
The downstream transition point between the
predominance of out-gassing and the increasing
influence of plant metabolism will be dynamic and
regulated by the initial ePCO2 of groundwater, the
rate of out-gassing, heterotrophic respiration of
stream biota and the biomass and metabolic activity
of aquatic plants.
Primary Producer Response
The primary food of the dominant consumers in
these springs (that is, the mayfly Deleatidium and
the snail Potamopyrgus) is biofilm (Winterbourn
2000), which showed a strong isotopic relationship
to d13C DIC and comprised 59% groundwater car-
bon. Bryophytes and filamentous algae also
showed significant relationships with d13C DIC, but
were unlikely to have been consumed directly by
any of the invertebrates used in this study (Death
2000). However, bryophytes and filamentous algae
are an integral part of the overall food web and
contribute to pools of coarse and fine particulate
organic matter (Suren and Winterbourn 1991;
Winterbourn 2000). Macrophyte d13C did not show
a significant relationship with d13C DIC. Algae vary
widely in d13C between species, water velocities,
and CO2 availability (Finlay and others 1999; Fin-
lay 2001) and similarly variable (species specific)
results have been obtained for aquatic macrophytes
(Osmond and others 1981). Furthermore, macro-
phytes in still water have been shown to have
markedly more enriched d13C values than the same
species in flowing water (France 1995). Hence,
the generally low water velocity at spring
sources compared to downstream reaches might
have contributed to the relative invariance of
594 D. P. Gray and others
macrophyte d13C values across a broad range of
d13C DIC. Some d13C enrichment of plants at spring
sources may also have occurred due to exposure to
the atmosphere during periods of low flow.
Food Web Response
An important finding of our study was that food
webs of the spring streams were tightly coupled to
the downstream trend in d13C DIC and derived at
least 50% of their carbon from groundwater. Pri-
mary consumers, predatory macroinvertebrates
and fish showed strong positive relationships with
d13C DIC. The strong relationship for fish suggests
they move around little within these streams.
However, the lack of significant downstream
enrichment of riparian spider 13C is contrary to the
assumption that Dolomedes aquaticus derives the
majority of its diet from aquatic sources (Williams
1979). Fishing spiders may be less reliant on
aquatic prey around heavily vegetated streams
such as these spring sources. Furthermore, there
may be seasonal shifts in use of aquatic versus
terrestrial prey related to the relative abundance of
each. Peak emergence times for common aquatic
insects in other streams in this part of New Zealand
are during late spring and summer (Winterbourn
and Crowe 2001), whereas our collections were
made in early spring (September).
CONCLUSION
Results of this study show that biological commu-
nities in floodplain spring streams are dependent
upon carbon derived from terrestrial vegetation in
the greater catchment. More importantly, in terms
of ecosystem processes, the study elucidates aspects
of the carbon cycle within floodplains that link
terrestrial, subterranean, and aquatic components,
a poorly understood aspect of the short-term carbon
cycle. Terrestrially fixed carbon is converted from
organic to inorganic form within soils and ground-
water, thereby becoming available to the auto-
trophic food web in the spring stream (Figure 7).
The d13C of atmospheric carbon is approximately
-8&. Photosynthesis by terrestrial C3 plants de-
pletes carbon to approximately -27& and this
carbon becomes incorporated into soils. Soil respi-
ration produces CO2, with a similar isotopic signa-
ture to its parent material, and enters groundwater.
Due to high concentrations of 13C-depleted carbon
in groundwater we observed strong biogeochemical
gradients along spring streams, gradients that re-
sulted from a combination of physical out-gassing
and metabolic activity by stream primary producers.
Upon discharge into surface streams DIC is used by
autotrophs for photosynthesis. Fractionation during
aquatic photosynthesis results in a further depletion
in 13C (reducing d13C by about 20&) prior to
incorporation into the food web. The double
depletion of d13C by photosynthesis in terrestrial
and subsequently aquatic autotrophs results in the
transmission of highly negative values through the
entire stream food web.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanks to Robert MacLagan (University of Can-
terbury) for providing expertise in carbon hydro-
chemistry and Justin Kitto, Jo O’cock and Pete
McHugh for valuable assistance in the field. Several
high country lessees and the New Zealand
Department of Conservation permitted access to
land. Funding was provided by the Brian Mason
Scientific and Technical Trust and the FRST funded
Groundwater Ecosystems Program (NIWA). DPG
Figure 7. Conceptual
diagram of the major
pathways, forms, and
isotopic values of carbon
that influence spring
streams in a braided river
floodplain. Inset:
relationship between d13C
DIC and food web (solid
line) and ePCO2 (dashed
line) with distance from
spring source.
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 595
was generously supported by a stipend from the
Miss E. L. Hellaby Grasslands Trust. Stephen A.
Norton provided helpful comments on an earlier
version of this manuscript.
REFERENCES
Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology: structure and
function of running waters. Dordrecht: Springer. 429.
Anekant MW, Bradshaw JD, Weaver S, Maas R, Ireland T, Eby
N. 2004. Provenance of the sedimentary Rakaia sub-terrane,
Torlesse Terrane, South Island, New Zealand: the use of
igneous clast compositions to define source. Sediment Geol
168:193–226.
Aravena R, Schiff SL, Trumbore SE, Dillon PJ, Elgood R. 1992.
Evaluating dissolved inorganic carbon cycling in a forested lake
watershed using carbon isotopes. Radiocarbon 34:636–45.
Arscott DB, Tockner K, Ward JV. 2000. Aquatic habitat diversity
along the corridor of an Alpine floodplain river (Fiume Ta-
gliamento, Italy). Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 149:679–704.
Atekwana EA, Krishnamurthy RV. 1998. Seasonal variations of
dissolved inorganic carbon and delta d13C of surface waters:
application of a modified gas evolution technique. J Hydrol
205:265–78.
Barth JAC, Veizer J. 1999. Carbon cycle in St. Lawrence aquatic
ecosystems at Cornwall (Ontario), Canada: seasonal and spa-
tial variations. Chem Geol 159:107–28.
Bontes BM, Pel R, Ibelings BW, Boschker HTS, Middelburg JJ,
Van Donk E. 2006. The effects of biomanipulation on the
biogeochemistry, carbon isotopic composition and pelagic
food web relations of a shallow lake. Biogeosciences 3:69–83.
Brunke M, Gonser T. 1997. The ecological significance of ex-
change processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshw
Biol 37:1–33.
Cerling TE, Solomon DK, Quade J, Bowman JR. 1991. On the
isotopic composition of carbon in soil carbon dioxide. Geo-
chim Cosmochim Acta 55:3403–5.
Clark ID, Fritz P. 1997. Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology.
Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press/Lewis. p 328.
Collier KJ. 1987. Spectrophotometric determination of dissolved
organic carbon in some South Island streams and rivers. N Z J
Mar Freshw Res 21:349–51.
Collier KJ, Bury S, Gibbs M. 2002. A stable isotope study of
linkages between stream and terrestrial food webs through
spider predation. Freshw Biol 47:1651–9.
Craig H. 1953. The geochemistry of the stable carbon isotopes.
Geochim Cosmochim Acta 3:53–92.
Davidson GR. 1995. The stable isotopic composition and mea-
surement of carbon in soil CO2. Geochim Cosmochim Acta
59:2485–9.
Davidson EA, Janssens IA. 2006. Temperature sensitivity of soil
carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nat-
ure 440:165–73.
Davies CW. 1962. Ion association. London: Butterworth. p 192.
Dawson JJC, Hope D, Cresser MS, Billett MF. 1995. Downstream
changes in free carbon dioxide in an upland catchment from
northeastern Scotland. J Environ Qual 24:699–706.
Death R. 2000. Invertebrate–substratum relationships. In: Collier
KJ, Winterbourn MJ, Eds. New Zealand stream invertebrates:
ecology and implications for management. Christchurch: New
Zealand Limnological Society. p 157–78.
Doctor DH, Kendall C, Sebestyen SD, Shanley JB, Ote N, Boyer
EW. 2008. Carbon isotope fractionation of dissolved inorganic
carbon (DIC) due to out-gassing of carbon dioxide from a
headwater stream. Hydrol Process 22:2410–23.
Doi H, Takagi A, Mizota C, Okano J, Nakano S, Kikuchi E. 2006.
Contribution of chemoautotrophic production to freshwater
macroinvertebrates in a headwater stream using multiple
stable isotopes. Int Rev Hydrobiol 91:501–8.
Elberling B, Ladegaard-Pedersen P. 2005. Subsurface CO2
dynamics in temperate beech and spruce forest stands. Bio-
geochemistry 75:479–506.
Elberling B, Matthiesen H. 2007. Methodologically controlled
variations in laboratory and field pH measurements in
waterlogged soils. Eur J Soil Sci 58:207–14.
Finlay JC. 2001. Stable carbon isotope ratios of river biota:
implications for energy flow in lotic food webs. Ecology
82:1052–64.
Finlay JC. 2003. Controls of stream water dissolved inorganic
carbon dynamics in a forested watershed. Biogeochemistry
62:231–52.
Finlay JC. 2004. Patterns and controls of lotic algal stable carbon
isotope ratios. Limnol Oceanogr 49:850–61.
Finlay JC, Power ME, Cabana G. 1999. Effects of water velocity
on algal carbon isotope ratios: implications for river food web
studies. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1198–203.
Fisher SG, Likens GE. 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New
Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem
metabolism. Ecol Monogr 43:421–39.
Fisher SG, Sponseller RA, Heffernan JB. 2004. Horizons in
stream biogeochemistry: flowpaths to progress. Ecology
85:2369–79.
France RL. 1995. 13C enrichment in benthic compared to
planktonic algae - foodweb implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser
124:307–12.
Gray DP, Harding JS. 2009. Braided river benthic diversity at
multiple spatial scales: a hierarchical analysis of beta diversity
in complex floodplain systems. J North Am Benthol Soc
28:537–51.
Gray DP, Scarsbrook MR, Harding JS. 2006. Patterns in spatial
biodiversity in a large New Zealand braided river New Zea-
land. J Mar Freshw Res 40:631–42.
Hawke JD, Polaschek JM. 2005. 13C and 15N in periphyton in the
lower Selwyn River (Canterbury, New Zealand), a ground-
water-fed river surrounded by intensive agriculture. N Z Nat
Sci 30:1–10.
Helie JF, Hillaire-Marcel C, Rondeau B. 2002. Seasonal changes
in the sources and fluxes of dissolved inorganic carbon
through the St. Lawrence River—isotopic and chemical con-
straints. Chem Geol 186:117–38.
Hellings L, Dehairs F, Van Damme S, Baeyens W. 2001. Dis-
solved inorganic carbon in a highly polluted estuary (the
Scheldt). Limnol Oceanogr 46:1406–14.
Hendy CH. 1971. Isotopic geochemistry of speleothems. 1. Cal-
culation of effects of different modes of formation on isotopic
composition of speleothems and their applicability as palaeo-
climatic indicators. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 35:801–32.
Hynes HBN. 1975. The valley and its stream. Verhandlungen der
Internationale Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandt
Limnologie 19:1–15.
Jepsen DB, Winemiller KO. 2007. Basin geochemistry and iso-
topic ratios of fishes and basal production sources in four
neotropical rivers. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:267–81.
596 D. P. Gray and others
Jones JB, Mulholland PJ. 1998. Influence of drainage basin
topography and elevation on carbon dioxide and methane
supersaturation of stream water. Biogeochemistry 40:57–72.
Kanduc T, Szramek K, Ogrinc N, Walter LM. 2007. Origin and
cycling of riverine inorganic carbon in the Sava River wa-
tershed (Slovenia) inferred from major solutes and stable
carbon isotopes. Biogeochemistry 86:137–54.
Karim A, Veizer J. 2000. Weathering processes in the Indus
River Basin: implications from riverine carbon, sulfur, oxygen,
and strontium isotopes. Chem Geol 170:153–77.
Keifer RH, Amey RG. 1992. Concentrations and controls of soil
carbon dioxide in sandy soils in the North Carolina coastal
plain. Catena 19:539–59.
Kendall C, Mast M, Rice K. 1992. Tracing watershed weathering
reactions with d13C. Water–rock interaction. In: Kharaka YK,
Maest AS, Eds. Proceedings of the 7th international sympo-
sium on water rock interaction. Rotterdam, USA: Balkema.
pp. 569–72.
Logan JM, Jardine TD, Miller TJ, Bunn SE, Cunjak RA, Lutca-
vage ME. 2008. Lipid corrections in carbon and nitrogen stable
isotope analyses: comparison of chemical extraction and
modeling methods. J Anim Ecol 77:838–46.
Madsen TV. 1991. Inorganic carbon uptake kinetics of the
stream macrophyte Callitriche cophocarpa Sendt. Aquat Bot
40:321–32.
Malard F, Uehlinger U, Zah R, Tockner K. 2006. Flood-pulse and
riverscapedynamics ina braided glacial river. Ecology 87:704–16.
Osmond CB, Valaane N, Haslam SM, Uotila P, Roksandic Z.
1981. Comparisons of delta C13 values in leaves of aquatic
macrophytes from different habitats in Britain and Fin-
land—some implications for photosynthetic processes in
aquatic plants. Oecologia 50:117–24.
Paetzold A, Schubert CJ, Tockner K. 2005. Aquatic terrestrial
linkages along a braided-river: riparian arthropods feeding on
aquatic insects. Ecosystems 8:748–59.
Parkhurst DL, Thorstenson DC, Plummer LN. 1990. PHREEQE.
A computer program for geochemical calculations. US Geo-
logical Survey, Water Resources Investigations 80–96, 195.
Pawellek F, Veizer J. 1994. Carbon cycle in the upper Danube and
its tributaries: d13C DIC constraints. Isr J Earth Sci 43:187–94.
Poole G. 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness
within the river discontinuum. Freshw Biol 47:641–60.
Quinn GP, Keough MJ. 2002. Experimental design and data
analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
p 537.
Rasmussen JB. 2010. Estimating terrestrial contribution to
stream invertebrates and periphyton using a gradient-based
mixing model for d13C. J Anim Ecol 79:393–402.
Raven JA, Osborne BA, Johnston AM. 1985. Uptake of CO2 by
aquatic vegetation. Plant Cell Environ 8:417–25.
Rounick JS, James MR. 1984. Geothermal and cold springs
faunas—inorganic carbon sources affect isotope values. Lim-
nol Oceanogr 29:386–9.
Sand-Jensen K, Frost-Christensen H. 1998. Photosynthesis of
amphibious and obligately submerged plants in CO2-rich
lowland streams. Oecologia 117:31–9.
Serrano MJG, Sanz LFA, Nordstrom DK. 2000. REE speciation in
low-temperature acidic waters and the competitive effects of
aluminium. Chem Geol 165:167–80.
Shibata H, Mitsuhashi H, Miyake Y, Nakano S. 2001. Dissolved
and particulate carbon dynamics in a cool-temperate forested
basin in northern Japan. Hydrol Process 15:1817–28.
Stanford JA. 1998. Rivers in the landscape: introduction to the
special issue on riparian and groundwater ecology. Freshw
Biol 40:402–6.
Stanford JA, Ward JV. 1993. An ecosystem perspective of allu-
vial rivers: connectivity and the hyporheic corridor. J North
Am Benthol Soc 12:48–60.
Stumm W, Morgan JJ. 1981. Aquatic chemistry: an introduction
emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters. New York:
Wiley Inter-science. p 780.
Suren A, Winterbourn MJ. 1991. Consumption of aquatic bry-
ophytes by alpine stream invertebrates in New Zealand. N Z J
Mar Freshw Res 25:331–43.
Taylor CB, Fox VJ. 1996. An isotopic study of dissolved inorganic
carbon in the catchment of the Waimakariri River and deep
ground water of the North Canterbury Plains, New Zealand.
J Hydrol 186:161–90.
Telmer K, Veizer J. 1999. Carbon fluxes, pCO2 and substrate
weathering in a large northern river basin, Canada: carbon
isotope perspectives. Chem Geol 159:61–86.
Tockner K, Paetzold A, Karaus U, Claret C, Zettel J. 2006.
Ecology of braided rivers. In: Sambrook Smith G, Best JL,
Bristow CS, Petts GE, Eds. Braided rivers: process, deposits,
ecology and management. Oxford: Blackwell. p 396.
Trimmer M, Hildrew AG, Jackson MC, Pretty JL, Grey J. 2009.
Evidence for the role of methane-derived carbon in a free-
flowing, lowland river food web. Limnol Oceanogr 54:1541–7.
Trojanowska A, Lewicka-Szczebak D, Jedrysek MO, Kurasiewicz
M, Wassenaar LI, Izydorczyk K. 2008. Diurnal variations in
the photosynthesis-respiration activity of a cyanobacterial
bloom in a freshwater dam reservoir: an isotopic study. Iso-
topes Environ Health Stud 44:163–75.
van der Nat D, Tockner K, Edwards PJ, Ward JV, Gurnell AM.
2003. Habitat change in braided flood plains (Tagliamento,
NE-Italy). Freshw Biol 48:1799–812.
Wachniew P. 2006. Isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic
carbon in a large polluted river: the Vistula, Poland. Chem
Geol 233:293–308.
Ward JV, Tockner K, Schiemer F. 1999. Biodiversity of flood-
plain river ecosystems: ecotones and connectivity. Regul
Rivers Res Manage 15:125–39.
Wiens JA. 2002. Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology
into the water. Freshw Biol 47:501–15.
Williams DS. 1979. The feeding behavior of New Zealand Dolo-
medes species (Araneae: Pisauridae). N Z J Zool 6:95–105.
Winterbourn MJ. 1997. New Zealand mountain stream com-
munities: stable yet disturbed. In: Streit B, Stadler T, Lively
CM, Eds. Evolutionary ecology of freshwater animals: con-
cepts and case studies. Basel: Birkhauser Verlag. p 31–54.
Winterbourn MJ. 2000. Feeding ecology. In: Collier KJ, Wint-
erbourn MJ, Eds. New Zealand stream invertebrates: ecology
and implications for management. Christchurch: New Zealand
Limnological Society. p 100–24.
Winterbourn MJ, Crowe ALM. 2001. Flight activity of insects
along a mountain stream: is directional flight adaptive?
Freshw Biol 46:1479–89.
Woessner WW. 2000. Stream and fluvial plain ground water
interactions: rescaling hydrogeologic thought. Ground Water
38:423–9.
Yang C, Telmer K, Veizer J. 1996. Chemical dynamics of the ‘‘St
Lawrence’’ riverine system: delta D-H2O, delta O18 (H2O),
delta C13 (DIC), delta S34 (sulfate), and dissolved Sr87/Sr86.
Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60:851–66.
Carbon Cycling in Floodplain Ecosystems 597