การพัฒนาการสอนโดยใช้แบบฝึกทักษะ...

6
37 37 Journal of Southern Technology Vol.10 No.2 July-December 2017 GSP 5 *e mail: [email protected] Curriculum and Instruction Program, Southern College of Technology (1) GSP (2) GSP GSP GSP One Group Pretest–Posttest Design t-test 87.41 88.83 (2) GSP .001 69.92 : GSP

Transcript of การพัฒนาการสอนโดยใช้แบบฝึกทักษะ...

37 37Journal of Southern Technology Vol.10 No.2 July-December 2017

GSP5

*e mail: [email protected]

Curriculum and Instruction Program, Southern College of Technology

(1) GSP (2)

GSP

GSP GSP One

Group Pretest–Posttest Design t-test

87.41 88.83 (2) GSP

.001 69.92

: GSP

38 38 –

The objectives of this research were to (1) develop teaching using the geometry exercise-the Geometer’s Sketchpad on quadrilateral, triangle, and circle in mathematics learning substance group for Grade

and (2) compare the student’s achievement of before and after teaching geometry using the Grade

academic year at Watkuankoei School, Nakhon Si Thammarat. The instruments used for this research were: 1) the geometry exercise using the Geometer’s Sketchpad, 2) a learning achievement test, and 3) a learning management plan. The data were analyzed to determine mean, standard deviation, percentage, relative growth, and t-test.

The research results revealed that: (1) the teaching using geometry exercise had a process efficiency of 87.41 and product efficiency of 88.83 and (2) the students had a higher learning achievement after teaching at .001 levels of significance and relative growth at 69.92%.

Geometric Exercise, Geometer’s Sketchpad, Geometry

Ministry of Education, 2008)

(Watkuankaey School, 2012)

The Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP)

Dynamic) Static)

( Thammachai, 2009 ) GSP

Animation)

Chansuk, 2012)

39 39Journal of Southern Technology Vol.10 No.2 July-December 2017

(Rercha, 2012)

GSP

1.

GSP

GSP

2

3

2

3

2 1. GSP

3

2.

GSP 3.

GSP 1)

2)

(3)

20 (4)

1)

(2)

40 40 –

1 t-test

1

12100XY

XXRG …… 1

RG Y 1X

2X

GSP 1.

GSP

80

( 1) 1 GSP

X

118.00 8.13 87.41

X 40 2.64 88.83

1

GSP 87.41

88.83 80

GSP

3

GSP

Pooprasert (2009) GSP

80.63 80

2.

GSP

( 2)

2

X 40 19.07 2.46

14 .001 69.92 40 2.64

2

19.07

41 41Journal of Southern Technology Vol.10 No.2 July-December 2017

.001

.001 69.92

Sangthong (2010) Watthanabud, Thunapun & Viiriyapong (2014) GSP

. 01 Chumsaeng (2012)

GSP

GSP .001

Puangchon, Sittirug & Manoonphol (2016)

Fogarty Nested

.01

GSP

1.

GSP

80

1. GSP

2.

3.

GSP

Chansuk, P. (2012). Comparison of Learning Achievement on the Mathematics Learning Content Group on Geometric Interpretation of Second Year Lower Secondary School Students between the Learning Facilitation using the GSP Program and the Normal Learning Facilitation. M.Ed. Thesis (Curriculum and Instruction), Mahasarakham University. [in Thai]

42 42 –

Chumsaeng, S. (2012). A Comparison of Learning Achievement and Retention in Supplementary Mathematics Entitled “The Area Enclosed by the Curve” for Grade 12 Students between using the GSP Program and the Conventional Method. M.Ed. Thesis (Curriculum and Instruction), Rajabhat Thepsatri University. [in Thai]

Ministry of Education. (2008). Teaching on Mathematics in Primary School. Bangkok: Office of the Private Education Commission. [in Thai]

Pooprasert, S. (2009). Results of Using the Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) Laboratory Lesson Focusing on Concentration Skills Geometry, Mathematics Learning Substance Group for Grade 6 Students. M.Ed. Thesis (Curriculum and Instruction), Rajabhat Thepsatri University. [in Thai]

Puangchon, D., Sittirug, A., & Manoonphol, K. (2016). Development of an integrated learning activity package on basic graph theory applying the Nested Model of Fogarty for grade 10 students. Journal of Southern Technology, 9(1), 13-18.

Rercha, K. (2012). Comparison of Learning Achievement on the Mathematics Learning Content Group on Geometric of First Year Lower Secondary School Students between the Learning Facilitation using the Exercise and the Normal Learning Facilitation. M.Ed. Thesis (Curriculum and Instruction), Rajabhat Buriram University. [in Thai]

Sangthong, A. (2010). A Study of Grade 8 Students’ Achievement on Studying Geometric Transformation using the Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP). M.Ed. Thesis (Curriculum and Instruction), Rajabhat Rajanagarindra University. [in Thai]

Thammachai, B. (2009). GSP Program Manual (4.06 Thai Version). Bangkok: IPST. [in Thai] Watthanabud, P., Thunapun, M., & Viiriyapong, N.

(2014). The development of mathematical instruction on surface area and volume for grade 9 students based on the geometer’s sketchpad program (GSP). Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakham University, 33(3), -134. [in Thai]

Watkuankaey School. (2012). Student Achievement Summary Report (Academic Tear 2012) Watkuankaey School. Nakhon Si Thammarat. [in Thai]