Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/clay nanocomposite membranes for fuel cell application
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/clay nanocomposite membranes for fuel cell application
Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/
layered double hydroxides nanocomposite
membranes for fuel cell application
Q1 M. Herrero a, A.M. Martos a, A. Varez a,*, J.C. Galvan b, B. Levenfeld a
aDepartamento de Ciencia e Ingenierıa de Materiales e Ingenierıa Quımica, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid,
Avenida de la Universidad, 30, 28911 Leganes, Madrid, SpainbCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Metalurgicas (CENIM-CSIC), Avda. Gregorio del Amo, 8, 28040 Madrid, Spain
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 26 December 2012
Received in revised form
6 June 2013
Accepted 10 June 2013
Available online xxx
Keywords:
PEM
Polysulfone
Layered double hydroxide
Proton conductivity
a b s t r a c t
In the present study, sulfonated polysulfone (sPSU)/layered double hydroxide (LDH)
composite membranes for use in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) were
investigated. Polysulfone (PSU) was sulfonated with trimethylsilyl chlorosulfonate in 1,2
dichloroethane at room temperature.
Composite membranes were prepared by blending different amount (0, 1, 2, and 5%) of
LDH nanoparticles with sPSU in dimethylacetamide (DMAc). The membranes were pre-
pared by the casting method and the samples obtained were characterized by XRD, FTIR
spectroscopy. The thermal behavior for all samples was evaluated by thermogravimetrical
analysis (TGA). Finally electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the
membranes electrical properties. The EIS measurements were carried out with the mem-
branes in contact with HCl solutions at different concentrations (10 3 ! c ! 10 1). Results
show a clear dependence of the membrane electrical resistance with the sulfonation
degree and the amount of the LDH added.
Copyright ª 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction
In the last years, great effort has gone into the fuel cells
development in order to avoid the dependence on hydrocar-
bon fuel and the pollution release during the process which
can be cause hazardous threat to the environment and human
life. The most promising fuel cells are the polymer electrolyte
membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) due their modularity [1] and
wide variety of applications. In PEMFCs a proton exchange
membrane (PEM) is the core, playing a key role. The PEMmust
show a high proton conductivity, a low electronic conductiv-
ity, thermal stability, low fuel permeability, good mechanical
properties and low cost [2,3]. The first and most utilized
membranes are based on expensive perfluorinated polymers,
which operate only under fully hydrated conditions [4]. Many
efforts are being done in order to replace this type of polymer,
the current alternatives are: (i) modified perfluorinated com-
posites membranes, (ii) functionalized non fluorinated poly-
mers and related composite, and (iii) acidebase composite
membrane [5,6].
The second approach includes polymers with high me-
chanical and chemical stability, relatively high proton con-
ductivity, low cost and low permeability to the fuel. Some of
them are: sulfonated polysulfone (SPSU) [7], sulfonated poly
(ether ketone) (SPEK) [8], sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone)
(SPEEK) [9], etc. Among these polymers, polysulfone is one of
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ34 916249484.E-mail address: [email protected] (A. Varez).
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/he
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u rn a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e7
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 1/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocompositemembranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
0360-3199/$ e see front matter Copyright ª 2013, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
ero os rez J.C.J.C. n eldeld
a clear dependence of the membrane electrical resista clear dependence of the membrane electrical resist
e, and (iii) acide, and (iii) acid
the preferred material due to its low cost, high thermal sta-
bility, and easy availability [10]. In addition, this polymer has
been easily sulfonated with various sulfonating agents giving
excellent proton conducting membranes.
Although, incorporations of inorganic fillers, such as, TiO2,
ZrO2, phosphotungistic acid, leads to an increase in some
properties of the virgin polymer [1,9,11e13], however clays are
the most promising reinforcement materials due to they can
easily be exfoliated to individual platelets inducing extremely
large surfaces and interface between the filler and the poly-
mer matrix. These lamellar solids are used to increase the
mechanical properties, decrease the fuel and water perme-
ability [14], and, due to their hygroscopic properties, maintain
humidity inside the membrane [13].
In this sense, LDHs, also called anionic clays or hydrotalcite-
like compounds, exhibit certain specific advantages (purity,
crystallinity and particle size control, easy functionalization),
which are lacking in layered silicates type nanoclays. LDHs
constitute a large family of inorganic materials, with the gen-
eral formula ½M2þ1-xM
3þx$ðOHÞ2&ðA
n-Þx=n$mH2O, where M2þ is a
divalent cation such as Mg, Ni, Zn, Cu, and M3þ is a trivalent
cation such asAl, Cr, Fe, V orGa; x is a value that determines the
layer charge density and the anion exchange capacity, ranges
between 0.2 and 0.4. An is an exchangeable anion with formal
charge n [15,16].
In this work, we disclose the preparation of LDH/SPSU
membranes by the castingmethod using dimethylacetamide as
solvent. The LDH used was Zn,Al-NO3 in order to minimize the
basic properties of this kind of compounds, and was prepared
by the coprecipitationmethod. The polysulfonewas sulfonated
using chlorotrimethylsilane as sulfonating agent, different
ratios PSU: chlorotrimethylsilane were used. The degree of
dispersion of the LDH particles and the type of the polymeric
membranes obtained were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD).
The interactions between LDH and SPSUwere discussed on the
basis of the FTIR spectroscopy data. The Water Uptake Mea-
surements were used as a quantitative measure of membrane
performance in fuel cells application. Performance of a mem-
brane is dependent on proton conductivity, which in turn often
depends on its water content. High proton conductivity is
supported by high level of water uptake; at the same time, it is
also a sign of low-dimensional stability as water influences the
polymer microstructure and mechanical properties. The ther-
mal stability was determined by TGA analysis and electro-
chemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to study the
membranes electrical properties. The EIS measurements were
carried out with the membranes in contact with HCl solutions
at different concentrations. Results showed a clear dependence
of the membrane electrical resistivity with the sulfonation
degree and the amount of the LDH added.
2. Experimental
2.1. Materials
The reagents, Zn(NO3)2$6H2O, Al(NO3)3$9H2O, NaOH were
from Panreac. Polysulfone polymer (Mn ¼ 22,000), trime-
thylsilyl chlorosulfonate (Si(CH3)3SO3Cl, 99%) and the sol-
vents, N,N-dimethylacetamide (CH3C(O)N(CH3)2, DMAc) and
1,2-dichlorethane (C2H4Cl2, DCE), were supplied by Aldrich. All
of them were used without further purification.
2.2. Preparation of the Zn,Al-NO3 LDH
The LDH selected was [Zn1 xAlx(OH)2](NO3)x0.8H2O (x ¼ 0.33)
due to the lower basicity. The powder was prepared by the
co-precipitation method [17]. A first solution was prepared by
dissolving Zn(NO3)2$6H2O and Al(NO3)3$9H2O in 250 mL of
water with a total Zn/Al concentration of 0.6 mol/L and a
Zn:Al molar ratio of 2. A second solution was prepared by
dissolving NaOH in 800 mL of water (NaOH concentration
1 mol/L). Both solutions were added drop-wise to decarbo-
nated water in a 3-neck vessel, with stirring and the pH was
maintained at a value of 8.0. The slurry was aged for 12 h at
40 (C with stirring. In order to minimize contamination with
atmospheric CO2, the reaction was carried out under a ni-
trogen purge. Prepared powder was characterized by XRD
and FTIR techniques.
2.3. Sulfonation of the polysulfone
The PSUwas sulfonated according to a procedure described by
Chao et al. [18]. The dried PSU (20 g) was dissolved in 100 mL
anhydrous 1,2-dichlorethane in a three-neck flask equipped
with mechanical stirrer, condenser and nitrogen purge inlet
which carries the gaseous HCl generated by the substitution.
The resulting solution was purged with nitrogen for 1 h and
chlorotrimethylsilane diluted in 20mL 1,2 dichloroethanewas
added to the solution, dropwise for 30 min. The resulting so-
lution was vigorously stirred for 24 h at room temperature.
After reaction was completed, SPSU was isolated from the
solution by precipitation with methanol, and then was
washed with deionized water for several times and dried to
constant weight. Two molar ratio of PSU:TMSCS were pre-
pared, 1:1 and 1:3. In case of higher TMSCS content, the sul-
fonated polymer produced was water soluble.
2.4. Membrane preparation
Dried sulfonated polysulfone was dissolved (5% wt) in dime-
thylacetamide (DMAc), and the resulting solution was filtered.
To prepare the composite membranes the LDH particles were
suspended in a SPSU-DMAc solution during 2 h with me-
chanical stirring and then in an ultrasonic bath for an addi-
tional hour. The membranes were cast on a Petri dish, using
the LDH-polymer solution, and dried at 60 (C during 12 h.
Finally, the membranes were washed with distillate water.
The amount of LDH incorporated in the membranes was from
1 to 5 wt% of the total mass (LDH þ polymer). The thickness of
the resulting membranes was around 100 mm.
2.5. Characterization and measurements
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were recorded in a X’Pert
Philips instrument using Cu-Ka radiation (l ¼ 1.54050 �A).
The FTIR spectra were recorded in a Perkin-Elmer Spec-
trum GX instrument, using KBr pellets; 100 spectra (recorded
with a nominal resolution of 4 cm 1) were averaged to
improve the signal-to-noise-ratio.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e72
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 2/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocomposite membranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
. The dried PSU (20 g) was dissolved in 100 m. The dried PSU (20 g) was dissolved in 100 m
in 20min 20m
Thermogravimetric analyses were carried out in TG-7
instrument from Perkin-Elmer. The sample was heated
from 50 to 900 (C in flowing nitrogen, at a heating rate of
10 (C min 1.
Water uptake of sulfonated polysulfones and LDH/SPSU
composites membranes were determined from the difference
between the dry and swollen membranes. A membrane of
3.8 cm2, was weighed dry and immersed in an excess of
distilled water for 24 h at room temperature and at higher
temperatures 60, 80 (C for 2 h. Then, the membrane was
removed wiped and weighed (Wwet). Finally, the membrane
was dried overnight at 80 (C in an oven, and after wasweighed
again (Wdry). The percentage of water absorbedwas calculated
using the following equation.
Water uptake (%) ¼ (Wwet Wdry) ) 100/Wdry
For electrical characterization we have used a test cell
constituted by two half-cells separated by two O-rings where
membrane was placed. A conventional electrochemical setup
of four electrodes was used for thesemeasurements involving
two saturated Ag/AgCl electrodes as reference electrodes and
two platinum electrodes as secondary electrodes. Impedance
spectroscopy (IS) measurements were carried using an
impedance analyzer (Solartron 1260) together an electro-
chemical interface (Solartron 1287). The measurements were
carried out at room temperature in the frequencies range of
0.1e105 Hz, by applying a *10 mV amplitude sinusoidal wave
perturbation, close to the resting membrane potential. Six
different HCl solutions (1 ) 10 3 ! c ! 0.1 M) were tested. The
solutions on both sides of the membrane have the same
concentration. Before measurement, membranes were
immersed for 12 h in a solution of the appropriated HCl
concentration.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Polysulfone sulfonation
Qualitative polysulfone sulfonation was confirmed using FTIR
spectroscopy and termogravimetrical analysis.
In Fig. 1a the FTIR spectra for the pristine polysulfone (PSU)
and sulfonated polysulfone in different amount (SPSU11 and
SPSU13) are displayed. In the sulfonated samples a new broad
band is recorded at 3400 cm 1, assigned to the stretching OeH
vibration of the eSO3H group. However, this band is not
enough to confirm the sulfonation process, because some
moieties of water bonded to the hydrophilic sulfonic groups,
whichwas not totally removed by the drying process, lead this
intense band. The sulfonation process is confirmed by the
presence of the shoulder, around 1030 cm 1, together the peak
located around 1014 cm 1 and assigned to the symmetric
stretching vibration of the diphenyl ether unit [19]. The
shoulder represent the symmetric stretching of eSO3H group.
This shoulder is more pronounced in the SPSU13 sample,
indicating the increase in the sulfonation degree. In this
polymer, the adsorption band due to the ether group overlaps
to the characteristic band associated to the asymmetric
stretching vibrations of eSO3H group, which appears at
1350e1150 cm 1 [20].
The thermogravimetric analysis of the PSU and SPSU
samples, recorded in flowing nitrogen, is shown in Fig. 1b. The
thermal degradation of PSU takes place in only one step be-
tween 525 and 600 (C, while for the SPSU at least 3 steps can be
distinguished in the TGA. This also has been reported by other
groups [7,21,22]. The first weight loss (up to 250 (C) was
assigned to evaporation of residual solvent and to the
desorption of water bonded to hydrophilic sulfonic groups,
which was not totally removed by the drying process. The
weight loss between 250 and 440 (C is associated to the loss of
sulfonic acid (eSO3H) groups. Finally the weight loss over
440 (C is associated to the polymermain chain decomposition.
As the sulfonation degree increases the onset of each loss
weight takes places at lower temperature indicating that sul-
fonation has a negative effect on the polymer thermal stability
and the increase in the sulfonation degree leads less thermal
stability in the polymer.
Fig. 1 e a. FTIR spectra of PSU, SPSU11 and SPSU13 among
the regions: 800e3100 cmL1 and 1050e950 cmL1. All
spectra were normalized for comparison (vertical bar
indicate the scale of y-axis). b. Thermogravimetric analysis
for polysulfone (PSU) and sulfonated polysulfone in
different degree (SPSU11 and SPSU13).
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u rn a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e7 3
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 3/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocompositemembranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
e
((
3.2. Physical characterization of nanocomposites
3.2.1. X-ray diffraction
The XRD patterns of the Zn,Al-NO3-LDH powder, SPSU11
membrane and the LDH/SPSU11 composite membranes with
different LDH contents (1, 2 and 5%wt) are displayed in Fig. 2a.
The very broad peak at 19.7( (2q) associated to the PSU in-
dicates the low crystallinity of the polymer. In the case of
composite membranes the main diffraction peak, d003, of the
Zn,Al-NO3-LDH (d003 ¼ 9 �A, 2q ¼ 10.1() is absent in the XRD
patterns of samples with 1( 2 wt% of LDH and only it is
observed in the highest loaded composite membrane (labeled
as arrows in Fig. 2a). This result could be expected for samples
containing low amount of LDH, due to the low concentration
and low crystallinity. When the LDH content increases up to
5 wt%, two very weak and broad diffraction peaks appear at
2q z 9.4 and 10(, one of them could correspond to the main
diffraction peak of Zn,Al-NO3-LDH (d003). On the other hand,
for composite membranes with 2 and 5% of LDH, also appears
a new peak at 2q z 5.5e6( that could be associated to the
intercalation of the part of the polymer between the interlayer
of the LDH [23,24].
3.2.2. FT-IR spectroscopy
The FT-IR was, also, used in order to determinate the specific
interaction of LDH/sPSU. The position of the shoulder corre-
sponding symmetric stretching vibration of the sulfonate
group band is very sensitive to the local environment of the
sulfonate anion [19,25], e.g. hydration by moisture or
hydrogen bonding by a second component in a polymer blend,
so that any interaction would shift the anion symmetric
stretching vibration to lower frequencies (higher wave-
number). In Fig. 2b FT-IR spectra of the SPSU11, SPSU11-1%
LDH and SPSU11-5%LDH are displayed in the region
1050e950 cm 1. The shoulder is shifted to higher wave-
number, indicating weak interactions between the hydroxyl
LDH layer and the sulfonic group, probably hydrogen bonding.
Furthermore the intensity of this shoulder increases as the
content of LDH, indicatingmajor interaction between the LDH
and the sPSU.
3.2.3. Thermal stability
In order to investigate the effect of the LDH in the thermal
stability of the LDH/PSU composites TGA was performed
(Fig. 3). Two behaviors can be observed depending on the
sulfonation degree. The presence of LDH in the SPSU11
membrane basically does not modify the thermal behavior of
the film (Fig. 3a). However in the case of the SPSU13 (Fig. 3b)
the main effect of introducing the LDH nanoparticles was a
significant displacement of, basically, all degradation peaks,
improving the thermal stability of the polymer. This effect is
associated to the thermal characteristic of the LDH which
could be ascribed to the hindering role of the LDH particles on
the diffusion of oxygen and volatile products throughout the
composite materials [26]. The thermal stability improves with
the LDH, but an optimum fraction exists beyond which the
thermal stability begins to deteriorate. In the SPSU13 when
the LDH content increases (samples with 5%) the thermal
degradation temperature seems decrease. This behavior has
been previously reported for other LDH-polymer system
[27,28] and is due to the fact that the high content of LDH can
catalyze the degradation of polymer.
3.2.4. Water uptake measurements
In Fig. 4, thewater uptake at different temperatures (25, 60 and
80 (C) of the different membrane tested is compared. After
sulfonation of PSU, the water uptake increases as a conse-
quence of the hydrophilic character of acid groups. Unlike
other system, the amount of water absorbed did not increase
with the temperature [13]. In the case of composite mem-
branes, and at the same sulfonic acid content, water uptake of
the different SPSU/LDH composite membranes is lower than
Fig. 2 e (a) PXRD patterns from the LDH, SPSU11 and the different LDH/SPSU11 membranes. (b) FT-IR spectra of SPSU11 and
composites with 1 and 5% (1100e950 cmL1 range). Vertical bar indicate the scale of y-axis.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e74
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 4/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocomposite membranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
d in the highest loaded composite membrane (d in the highest loaded composite membrane (
e
SPSUmembrane. This behavior was found in other composite
membrane system [29,30] and it was attributed to the reduc-
tion of the free volume and swelling ability, however this
argument cannot be admitted in this case because the water
uptake increases with the amount of LDH. This situation is
compatible with the formation of hydrogen bonding between
sulfonic acid group and the hydrotalcite type compound.
Regarding to the evolution of water uptake of composite
membranes with the temperature we observed, as expected,
an increases of water absorbed with the temperature.
3.2.5. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
The study of the electric properties of the membranes was
performed using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
(EIS). Prepared membranes were placed in contact with the
different acid solutions and they were equilibrated during a
specific time period in contact with the electrolyte. After this,
impedance spectroscopy measurements were carried out in a
four electrode electrochemical cell. Fig. 5a shows the Nyquist
plot (Z0 vs Z00) for SPSU11 with 1% of LDH in contact with
different HCl solutions. All the spectra present clearly two
semicircles, which change with the HCl concentration of so-
lutions. The first semicircle (high frequency arc (HFA)) could
be associated to the membrane capacitance (or constant
phase element of the membrane) acting in parallel with its
resistance. The low frequency arc (LFA) is clearly deformed
and is associated to diffusion of electroactive species through
the membrane [31]. In all the cases, the high frequency
semicircle does not intercept the origin of the plot, indicating
the presence of a resistive element in serieswith the other two
processes. This resistive element should be related to the
electrolyte.
The experimental data for each membrane and each HCl
concentration were fitted with commercial software [32] to
different equivalent circuits. The best fitting was obtained for
the equivalent circuit showed in the inset of Fig. 5. In this
circuit, Rs represents the resistance of the electrolytic solu-
tion, Ri usually is related to the ionic resistance of the mem-
brane, Cg is assigned to the geometric capacitance of the
membrane, and Zws theWarburg impedance in diffusion layer
with finite thickness. From the fitting, the values of the
different circuit parameterswere determined. As expected the
resistivity associated to the membrane decreases with
amount of HCl (Fig. 5b). This behavior has been also observed
in poly(ether ether sulfone) [33] and is attributed to the con-
centration dependence of the electrolyte solution embedded
in the membrane matrix.
Fig. 6a shows the evolution of the impedance plots as a
function of the amount of LDH added to the membrane. The
diameter of the high frequency arcs decreases with the
amount of LDH, indicating an improving of the proton con-
ductivity with the amount of inorganic powder. The SPSU/
LDH nanocomposite membranes have a better electrical
behavior than those membrane based on the SPSU matrix
alone (blank membrane), showing the lowest electrical
Fig. 3 e TGA curves of the sulfonated polysulfone in different degree (PSU11 and PSU13) and their respective LDH
composites.
Fig. 4 e Water uptake measurements at different
temperatures (25, 60 and 80 (C) for SPSU and SPSU
composites.
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u rn a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e7 5
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 5/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocompositemembranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
resistivity the SPSU with a 5% wt of LDH (Fig. 6b). Even these
values are lower than that of Nafion. These results indicate
that this kind of nanocomposites membranes is very prom-
ising for being applied as proton-exchange membranes.
4. Conclusions
A series of sulfonated polysulfone/layered double hydroxide
nanocomposite membranes were prepared using solvent
casting technique. The Zn,Al-NO3 LDH powder was obtained by
the coprecipitation method. Polysulfone was sulfonated with
trimethylsilyl chlorosulfonate in 1,2 dichloroethane at room
temperature and different sulfonation degrees were obtained.
The sulfonation of PSU reduces the thermal stability of the
polymer. However the introduction of LDH powders improved
the thermal behavior, especially in the case of the samples
with higher sulfonation degree. The introduction of LDH clearly
affects the properties of SPSU membranes, particularly their
water uptake, electrical and transport parameters. Electro-
chemical characterization of the membranes by EIS shows
behaviors that depend on the concentration of both the elec-
trolyte and membrane. The electrical resistivity of membrane
(inversely connected to the proton conductivity) is closely
related with both the concentration of HCl in contact with
membrane and with the layered double hydroxide nano-
composite. This work demonstrates that LDH-composites
membranes are promising materials for proton-exchange pro-
cess, due to membrane transport are quite similar to those of
the best PEM system.
Acknowledgments
Authors thanks financial support received from the regional
government (Comunidad de Madrid through MATERYENER
S2009 PPQ-1626), and Spanish Government, MICINN (MAT2010-
19837-CO6).
Fig. 5 e (a) Complex Impedance plot for the membrane composite with 1% of LDH at different HCl concentration. The
equivalent circuit used for fitting is also displayed in the inset. (b) Evolution of the membrane resistivity with the HCl
concentration.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 6 e (a) Nyquist plot for three composite membranes with different percentage of LDH (1, 2 and 5%) (c [ 0.05 M HCl). (b)
Resistivity of the membrane vs %LDH. Values are also compared with nafion membrane.
i n t e r n a t i o n a l j o u r n a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e76
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 6/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocomposite membranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041
r e f e r e n c e s
[1] Unnikrishnan L, Mohanty S, Nayak SN, Singh N. Synthesisand characterization of polysulfone/clay nanocompositemembranes for fuel cell application. J Appl Polym Sci2012;124:E309e18.
[2] Thanganathan U, Nogami M. Synthesis of mixed compositemembranes based polymer/HPA: electrochemicalperformances on low temperature PEMFCs. J Membr Sci2012;411e412:109e16.
[3] Hickner MA, Ghassemi H, Kim YS, Einsla BR, McGrath JE.Alternative polymer systems for proton exchangemembranes (PEMs). Chem Rev 2004;104:4587e612.
[4] Peighambardoust SJ, Rowshanzamir S, Amjadi M. Review ofthe proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications.Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35:9349e84.
[5] Jannasch P. Recent developments in high-temperatureproton conducting polymer electrolyte membranes. CurrOpin Colloid Interface Sci 2003;8:96e102.
[6] Roziere J, Jones DJ. Non-fluorinated polymer materials forproton exchange membrane fuel cells. Ann Rev Matter Res2003;33:503e5.
[7] Lufrano F, Squadrito G, Patti A, Passalacqua E. Sulfonatedpolysulfone as promising membranes for polymer electrolytefuel cells. J Appl Polym Sci 2000;77:1250e7.
[8] Sangeetha D. Sulphonated poly(ether ether ketone) protonexchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Int J PolymMater 2007;56:535e48.
[9] Kim TW, Sahimi M, Tsotsis TT. Preparation andcharacterization of hybrid hydrotalcite-sulfonatedpolyetheretherketone (SPEEK) cation-exchange membranes.Ind Eng Chem Res 2009;48:9504e13.
[10] Zhu Y, Manthiram A. Synthesis and characterization ofpolysulfone-containing sulfonated side chains for directmethanol fuel cells. J Power Sources 2011;196:7481e7.
[11] Navarra MA, Croce F, Scrosati B. New, high temperaturesuperacid zirconia-doped Nafion composite membranes.J Mater Chem 2007;17:3210e5.
[12] Wu Z, Sun G, Jin W, Hou H, Wang S, Xin Q. Nafion andnanosize TiO2eSO4
2 solid superacid composite membranefor direct methanol fuel cell. J Membr Sci 2008;313:336e43.
[13] Unnikrishnnan L, Madamana P, Mohanty S, Nayak SK.Polysulfone/C30B nanocomposite membranes for fuel cellapplications: effect of various sulfonating agents. PolymPlastics Technol Eng 2012;51:568e77.
[14] Smita B, Sridhar S, Khan AA. Proton conducting compositemembranes from polysulfone and heteropolyacid for fuelcell applications. J Polym Sci B 2005;43:1538e47.
[15] Cavani F, Trifiro F, Vaccari A. Hydrotalcite-type anionic clays:preparation, properties and applications. Catal Today1991;11:173e302.
[16] Rives V. Layered double hydroxides: present and future. NewYork: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2001.
[17] Gardner E, Pinnavaia TJ. On the nature of selective olefinoxidation catalysts derived from molybdate- and tungstate-intercalated layered double hydroxides. Appl Catal A1998;167:65e74.
[18] Chao HS, Kelsey DR. Process for preparing sulfonatedpoly(arylether)resins. US patent number 4,625,000;November 25, 1986.
[19] Deimedea VA, Fragou KV, Koulouri EG, Kallitsis JK,Voyiatzis GA. Miscibility behavior of polyamide 11/sulfonated polysulfone blends using thermal andspectroscopic techniques. Polymer 2000;41:9095e101.
[20] Linares A, Benavente R. Effect of sulfonation on thermal,mechanical and electrical properties of blends based onpolysulfones. Polym J 2009;41:407e15.
[21] Park HB, Shin HS, Lee YM, Rhim JW. Annealing effect ofsulfonated polysulfone ionomer membranes on protonconductivity and methanol transport. J Membr Sci2005;247:103e11.
[22] Guan R, Zou H, Lu D, Gong C, Liu Y. Polyethersulfonesulfonated by chlorosulfonic acid and its membranecharacteristics. Eur Polym J 2005;41:1554e60.
[23] Uhl FM, Davuluri SP, Wong SC, Webster DC. Polymer filmspossessing nanoreinforcements via organically modifiedlayered silicate. Chem Mater 2004;16:1135e42.
[24] Anadao P, Sato LF, Wiebeck H, Valenzuela-Dıaz FR.Montmorillonite as a component of polysulfonenanocomposite membranes. Appl Clay Sci 2010;48:127e32.
[25] Lu X, Weiss RA. Development of miscible blends of bisphenolA polycarbonate and lightly sulfonated polystyreneionomers from intrapolymer repulsive interactions.Macromolecules 1996;29:1216.
[26] Sur GS, Sun HL, Lyu SG, Mark JE. Synthesis, structure,mechanical properties and thermal stability of somepolysulfone/organoclay nanocomposites. Polymer2001;42:9783e9.
[27] Herrero M, Benito P, Labajos FM, Rives V, Zhu YD, Allen GC,et al. Structural characterization and thermal properties ofPA6.6/Mg, Al/Ad-LDH nanocomposites obtained by solidstate polymerization. J Solid State Chem 2010;183:1645e51.
[28] Du L, Qu B, Zhang M. Thermal properties and combustioncharacterization of nylon 6/MgAl-LDH nanocomposites viaorganic modification and melt intercalation. Polym DegradStab 2007;92:497e502.
[29] Kalappa P, Lee JH. Proton conducting membranes based onsulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/TiO2 nanocomposites fora direct methanol fuel cell. Polym Int 2007;56:371e5.
[30] Devrim Y, Erkan S, Bac N, Eroglu I. Preparation andcharacterization of sulfonated polysulfone/titanium dioxidecomposite membranes for proton exchange membrane fuelcells. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2009;34:3467e75.
[31] Aranda P, Galvan JC, Casal B, Ruiz-Hitzky E. Electrochemicalcharacterization of composite membranes based on crown-ethers intercalated into montmorillonite. Colloid Polym Sci1994;272:712e20.
[32] ZView for Windows, impedance/gain phase graphing andanalysis software. Southern Pines, NC, USA: ScribnerAssociates Inc.; 2010.
[33] Benavente J, Canas A, Ariza MJ, Lozano AE, De Abajo J.Electrochemical parameters of sulfonated poly-ether ethersulfone/membranes in HCl solutions determined byimpedance spectroscopy and membrane potentialmeasurements. Solid State Ionics 2001;145:53e60.
i n t e rn a t i o n a l j o u rn a l o f h y d r o g e n en e r g y x x x ( 2 0 1 3 ) 1e7 7
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
HE11997_proof ■ 28 June 2013 ■ 7/7
Please cite this article in press as: Herrero M, et al., Synthesis and characterization of polysulfone/layered double hydroxidesnanocompositemembranes for fuel cell application, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.06.041