Global and local governance of shrimp farming in the Mekong ...
SHRIMP FARMING: BIOFLOC AS BIOSECURTY ? - Amazon ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of SHRIMP FARMING: BIOFLOC AS BIOSECURTY ? - Amazon ...
SHRIMP FARMING: BIOFLOC AS BIOSECURTY ?
Nyan Taw, Ph.D.
Technical Consultant
Blue Archipelago BHD
MALAYSIA
Biofloc, a very recent technology seem a very promising for stable and sustainable production
as the system has self nitrification process within culture ponds with zero water exchange
(Yoram, 2000, 2005a&b & Yoram, et at 2012). The technology has been successfully applied
commercially in Belize by Belize aquaculture (McIntosh, 2000a, b & c, 2001). It also has been
applied with success in shrimp farming in Indonesia, Malaysia (Nyan Taw 2004, 2005, 2008,
2010, 2011 &, 2012) and recently successfully commercialized in Malaysia (Nyan Taw, et.at
2013). The combination of two technologies, partial harvesting and biofloc, has been studied in
northern Sumatra, Indonesia (Nyan Taw 2008 et. al). Recently, a semi-biolfoc applied in
earthen ponds in Myanmar was published (Taw & Tun, 2013) and biofloc technology used
successfully in small family own farm in Bali, Indonesia will be published in early 2014 (Taw &
Setio, 2014)
With emerging viral problems and rising costs for energy, biosecure farm design with biofloc
technology appears to be an answer for sustainable production.
INTRODUCTION
FLOC COMMUNITIES AND SIZE
The biofloc Defined as macroaggregates – diatoms,
macroalgae, fecal pellets, exoskeleton,
remains of dead organisms, bacteria,
protest and invertebrates.
(Decamp, O., et al 2002)
100 µ
BIOFLOC
As Natural Feed (filter feeders – L. vannamie & Tilapia) : It is possible that microbial protein has a higher availability than feed protein (Yoram, 2005)
Brown Green
Biofloc technology is a system that has a self-nutrification process
within culture pond water with zero water exchange (Yoram, 2012)
BIOFLOC TECHNOLOGY CONCEPT
SHRIMP FARMING IN BIOFLOC
SUMMARY 1. High stocking density - over 130 – 150 PL10/m2 2. High aeration – 28 to 32 HP/ha PWAs 3. Paddle wheel position in ponds (control biofloc & sludge by siphoning) 4. Biofloc control at <15 ml/L 5. HDPE / Concrete lined ponds 6. Grain (pellet) 7. Molasses 8 C&N ratio >15 9. Expected production 20–25 MT/ha/crop with 18-20 gms shrimp
Bioflocs
High density
High aeration & PWAs position
Dark Vannamei Red Vannamei Grain pellet
Feed & grain application & Growth
Biofloc
Avg. F/D, GP Consumption & Growth Performance
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134
DOC (days)
GP (kg), F/D (kg)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
MBW (g)
F/D GP MBW
Paddle Wheels Aerator – Efficiency
Standard with 2 paddle wheel set – 1 HP
Model NAN RONG – High efficiency NR-A135
Specification: Horse power 1 HP
Standard O2 transfer rate 4.99 kgs O2/hr
DO 4.0 to 8.0 ppm
Effective horizontal disturbance of water 53.2 to 63.84 meters
Effective vertical disturbance of water 1.1 to 1.4 meter
Carrying capacity: Optimum efficiency (P. monodon)- 250 to 350 Kgs/HP.
Carrying Capacity – Vannamei
(Kopot & Taw GAA 2004)
Paddle Wheels Aerator – Efficiency
Standard with 2 paddle wheel set – 1 HP
Model NAN RONG – High efficiency NR-A135
Specification: Horse power 1 HP
Standard O2 transfer rate 4.99 kgs O2/hr
DO 4.0 to 8.0 ppm
Effective horizontal disturbance of water 53.2 to 63.84 meters
Effective vertical disturbance of water 1.1 to 1.4 meter
Carrying capacity: Optimum efficiency (P. monodon)- 250 to 350 Kgs/HP.
Carrying Capacity – Vannamei
(Kopot & Taw GAA 2004)
Physical barrier for viral carriers – use 250 micron screen net
Chemical application – kill viral carriers. Apply crusticides
Kill free water bore virus (aging) - dies in 72 hrs without host
Treated water ready for use for culture (apply same procedure)
MODULE OPERATION Water treatment system (Control WSSV)
Treatment Reservoirs ponds
Culture ponds Clean animals – SPF or SPR or PCR check Clean Ponds–clean or oxidized pond bottom Clean Water– treated water & nets (250 micron) Prevent carriers (fence) Strict security to avoid biosecurity breaches
Basic Procedure (Summary) Parameters Closed Water Semi Closed Water Open Water
Fill in Water Quarantine, Treatment
and Culture ponds (Max.
level > 120 cm)
Started fill in to Quarantine,
Treatment and Culture
ponds (optimum level >100
cm)
Started fill in to Quarantine,
Treatment and Culture ponds
(Max level > 120 cm).
DOC ( 1 - 45 46 – 90 91 - harvest
Apply Crustacide
To Kill WSSV Carrier
All ponds/0.5 – 1.0 ppm Use whenever possible No use
Bio assay
Check toxicity
Yes - approximately 5–10
days
Yes – approximately 5-10
days
No need
Aging water
To Kill WSSV in water
All ponds minimum 3
days
Minimum 3 days Minimum 3 days
Screening: 250 – 300
micron. Prevent carrier
entering module
Yes – at all critical points:
Main inlet, between QP &
TP; TP & Main TP or
Supply canal. TP & CP
Yes – at all critical points:
Main inlet, between QP &
TP; TP & Main TP or
Supply canal. TP & CP
Yes – at all critical points:
Main inlet, between QP & TP;
TP & Main TP or Supply
canal. TP & CP
Water exchange No Minimum (topping up only) Maximum
Water source Within module only Start open to outside Open to outside
BASIC OPERATION PROCEDURE (SUMMARY)
POND WATER PREPARATION For already treated water initially in culture ponds and series of
treatment reservoirs for later use>
Day Activity
1 Urea 8 kg & TSP 1 kg
Grain pellet 30 kg & Dolomite 50 kg
2 Tea seed cake 15 ppm
4 Grain pellet 30 kg & Dolomite 50 kg
6 Grain pellet 30 kg & Dolomite 50 kg
8 Grain pellet 50 kg, Molasses 8 kg & Kaolin 50 kg
10 Grain pellet 50 kg
12 Kaolin 50 kg
Nyan Taw AA 2006, LV
Shrimp will be cultured in less or no water exchange system. Water will be added only
to replace the loose water by siphon or evaporation. Water level starts with maximum
and maintain at optimum level. The system is to promote and switch from autotrophic
to heterotrophic condition. Water quality management during culture operation
Culture System (for 0.5 ha HDPE lined pond)
1. Dissolved Oxygen: Maintained at level >4 ppm.
2. Alkalinity: Maintained at level > 70 ppm by applied 50 kg/pond
Hydrated lime (Ca(OH)2) every week.
3. Kaolin: Apply 50 kg/pond once every three week.
4. Molasses: Apply 8.0 kg/pond three times a week
5. Grain Pellet: Apply together with feed from 10-20% during earlier
stage and increase to 20-50 % during late stage (see standard).
6. Sludge: Sludge accumulation in pond bottom need to be
removed periodically by siphoning.
7. Management: All applications need to be adjusted by Shrimp growth,
Biomass, Feed per day and Biofloc volume.
POND WATER MANAGEMENT
DURING OPERATION
Culture System (for 0.5 ha HDPE lined pond)
FEED AND GRAIN PELLET USED (KG /DAY)
Full Biofloc Stock - 130 PL10/m2; 15 HP/0.5 ha; DoC 90-110 Production - 10-12 MT/0.5 ha; MBW 18-20 gram SR 80%; FCR 1.2 (feed ); Carrying Capacity - 650-750 kg/HP
SHRIMP FARM, INDONESIA BIOFLOC TECHNOLOGY APPLIED
IN COMPANY ASSET PONDS
Floc System Production R&D, Trial and Company Commercial Ponds
Period 2003 - 2005
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
< 2,0 2,0-
2,4
2,5-
3,0
3,0-
3,5
3,5-
4,0
4,0-
4,9
5,0-
5,9
6,0-
6,9
7,0-
7,9
8,0-
8,9
9,0-
9,9
10,0-
10,9
11,0-
11,9
>12.0
Production range (kg/5000m2)
Nu
mb
er
of
po
nd
R&D. Density 100-200 pcs/m2, M BW 16.41 g, Biomass 9.905 kg, SR 81.7 %, FCR 1.29 (number of ponds = 46)
TRIAL. Density 140 pcs/m2 , M BW 16.56 g, Biomass 10.082 kg, SR 87.0 %, FCR 1.42 (number of ponds = 13)
CCP. Density 130 pcs/m2 (standard), M BW 16.99 g, Biomass 9.557 kg, SR 85.5 %, FCR 1.21 (number of ponds = 131)
NO VIRAL (WSSV) OUTBREAKS: 2003-2005
From:
David M. Smith, et al, 2008 Development of protocols for the culture of black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon,in “zero”water exchange production ponds
P. monodon CULTURED IN BIOFLOC
0
5
10
15
20
40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110Density 80 (Dike)Density 110 (Full)Density 130 Biofloc
PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF ARCA BIRU FARM
Biofloc 0.4 ha HDPE Semi-Biofloc 0.8 ha HDPE Conven 0.8 ha HDPE Dyke
No of Ponds 2 19 119
PWA Energy (Hp) 14 24 20
Stocking Density 130 110 83
DOC (days) 90 101 111
SR (%) 89.16 81.35 83.19
MBW (gr) 18.78 18.31 17.80
FCR (x) 1.39 1.58 1.77
ADG (gr/day) 0.21 0.18 0.16
Avg Harvest tonnage (kg) 9,006 12,950 9,616
Production (Kg/Ha) 22,514 16,188 12,019
Prod per power input (Kg/Hp) 643 540 481
Production ParameterSystem/size/type
Growth
DoC
PERFORMANCE –BIOFLOC & SEMI BIOFLOC Acar Beru, Blue Archipelago, Malaysia
Grams
Nyan Taw, et.al. GAA March/April 2011
No Viral (WSSV) outbreaks
i-SHARP SHRIMP FARM PROJECT
Malaysia - Semi and Full biofloc
Phase one
Paddle wheel aerators position
HDPE Lined modules
Modules in operation
Production Performance CYCLE Trial & 1 for Modules 1 & 2
Density 40/m2 Density 60/m2 Density 80/m2 Density 130/m2 Density 100/m2 Density 100/m2
No of ponds 20 16 8 BFT 4 BFT* 24 BFT 24 BFT
Paddle Wheels Aerators (HP) 12 12 12 16 12 12
Days of Culture (DoC) 113 108 94 88 100 99
Survival Rate (%) 112.23 101.22 106.05 69.56 97.30 104.92
MBW (grams) 21.65 17.41 13.86 12.56 16.05 16.31
FCR 1.34 1.47 1.32 1.74 1.39 1.26
Average Production (kg/pond) 4,875 5,294 5,828 5,677 7,714 8,547
Average Production (kg/ha) 9,749 10,587 11,655 11,354 15,428 17,093
Prod per power Input (Kg/Hp) 406 441 486 355 643 712
CYCLE 1 -Modules 1 & 2 Production Parameter
CYCLE Trial - Modules 1 & 2
ISHARP BLUE ARCHIPELAGO, MALAYSIA SEMI-BIOFLOC PERFORMANCE
Nyan Taw et. al. GAA Jan/Feb 2013
No EMS or WSSV outbreaks –
October 2011-July 2013
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12
Rai
n (
mm
),Sa
linit
y (p
pt)
& T
emp
erat
ure
(C
)
Month/ Week
Rain water Salinity Temperature
CYCLE Trial - Modules 1 & 2 CYCLE 1 - Modules 1 & 2
iSHARP Project, Malaysia
BIOSECURITY & BIOFLOC
MANAGED TO PASS THROUGH MONSOON ?
Nyan Taw et. al. GAA Jan/Feb 2013
BIOFLOC IN BALI, INDONESIA Family Owned Farm
0
5
10
15
20
42 50 58 64 72 79 86 93 97
Normal…Intense…g
Days of Culture
NO VIRAL (IMNV
or WSSV)
OUTBREAKS
2009-2013
Northern Coast of Bali, Indonesia
SHRIMP FARM BALI - Biofloc technology
Culture period August- November 2012
Pond A2 A3 F1 F2 E1 E2* B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3
Pond Size (M2) 2,400 2,600 2,800 2,800 1,000 750 2,000 2,000 2,000 600 600 600
PL Stocking Density (No/m2) 170 148 150 145 150 180 155 155 155 175 175 175
Aeration (hp) 18 18 16 18 6 4 12 12 12 12 6 4
Days of Culture 97 97 97 95 95 45 82 82 81 82 82 81
Body weight (gm) 18.4 18.12 15.32 17.3 16.48 4 19.5 18.5 16 14.68 19.72 18.48
Feed Conversion ratio 1.26 1.35 1.49 1.29 1.46 1.2 1.4 1.25 1.35 1.1 1.14
Survival (%) 105.8 104 101 106 94.7 103.9 94 92.9 97.4 98.5 101.9
Production (kg)/pond 7,914 7,281 6,388 7,682 2,345 6,307 5,399 4,622 1,503 2,050 1,981
Production (kg/ha) 32,976 28,004 22,814 27,436 23,450 31,535 26,995 23,110 25,050 34,167 33,017
Production/power input (kg/hp) 440 405 399 427 391 526 450 385 376 342 495
* Aeration problem - DO dropped <1.0ppm
Farm total Production: 53,472 kg (26,736 kg/ha)
In this cycle ponds B1,B2, B3,C1,C2 & C3 intense control less DOC to just over 80 days- more cycles/yearTaw & Setio, 2014 (to be published in Jan-Feb GAA 2014)
SHRIMP CULTURE - SEMI-BIOFLOC IN MYANMAR
Earthen pond bedside Soft Shell Crab Farm
Soft Shell Crab Farm Shrimp Ponds
L. vanamei Post Larvae imported from Thailand by Air
No viral outbreaks
Two modules-earthen ponds:
one module consisted of 1
reservoir and 3 production
ponds
STOCK VANNAMEI PL IN MARCH 2013
Taw & Tun, 2013
Shrimp sampling
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
Belize, CAmerica 2000
Lampung Indo2003-05
Medan, Indo2008
Java, Indo2008
N Bali, Indo2009
BAB Malaysia2010
BAB Malaysia2010 Trial
Commercial Kg/ha Max Record Kg/ha
BIOFLOC IN SHRIMP FARMING Production Performance
Kg
NITRIFICATION SEQUENCE
Avnimelech et. at, 2012 (data from experimental pond Dor, Israel)
Avnimelech et al 2012
25
Pond
Environment
( DO , pH , Temp , Trans , PO4-P ,
CO2 , TAN , NH3-N , NO2-N , NO3-N ,
Sal , Alk , Chlor-a , Floc , Bact , etc. )
WATER PARAMETER
72.01.10
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111
DOC (DAYS)
DO, pH, TRANSPARENCY
( X 10 )
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50TEMP
DO( am) pH (am) pH (pm) DO (pm)
Trans (cm) Temp(am) Temp (pm)
Vannamei STD 131 pcs./m2
Production : 8,971.8 kg; MBW
: 16.36 g SR: 83.9 %
FCR: 1.0 ADG: 0.14 DOC:
113
WATER PARAMETER
72.01.10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111
DOC (DAYS)
PO4-P, TAN, CO2
NO2-N, SALINITY(X10)
025
5075100125
150175200
225250275
300325350
375400425450
475500
ALKALINITY,
Chlorophyl a (ug/l)
PO4-P (ppm) Sal (ppt) TAN (ppm)NO2-N (ppm) CO2 (ppm) Total Alk (ppm)Chlorophyl a (µg/l)
Vannamei STD 131 pcs./ m2
Product ion : 8,971.8 kg; MBW : 16.36 g SR: 83.9 %
FCR: 1.0ADG: 0.14 DOC: 113
SHRIMP PERFORMANCE
72.01.10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111
DOC (DAYS)
MBW (g), Floc (ml/1L)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
F/D (kg), Grain Pellet (kg),
Floc (ml/1L) MBW (g) Feed/day (kg) Grain Pellet (kg)
Van n amei STD 13 1 pcs. / m2
Pr oduct ion : 8 , 9 7 1. 8 kg; M BW : 16 . 3 6 g SR: 8 3 . 9 %
FCR: 1. 0 ADG: 0 . 14 DOC: 113
WATER PARAMETER
72.01.10
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111
DOC (DAYS)
DO, pH, TRANSPARENCY
( X 10 )
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50TEMP
DO( am) pH (am) pH (pm) DO (pm)
Trans (cm) Temp(am) Temp (pm)
Vannamei STD 131 pcs./m2
Production : 8,971.8 kg; MBW
: 16.36 g SR: 83.9 %
FCR: 1.0 ADG: 0.14 DOC:
113
WATER PARAMETER
72.01.10
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111
DOC (DAYS)
PO4-P, TAN, CO2
NO2-N, SALINITY(X10)
025
5075100125
150175200
225250275
300325350
375400425450
475500
ALKALINITY,
Chlorophyl a (ug/l)
PO4-P (ppm) Sal (ppt) TAN (ppm)NO2-N (ppm) CO2 (ppm) Total Alk (ppm)Chlorophyl a (µg/l)
Vannamei STD 131 pcs./ m2
Product ion : 8,971.8 kg; MBW : 16.36 g SR: 83.9 %
FCR: 1.0ADG: 0.14 DOC: 113
SHRIMP PERFORMANCE
72.01.10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 11 21 31 41 51 61 71 81 91 101 111
DOC (DAYS)
MBW (g), Floc (ml/1L)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
F/D (kg), Grain Pellet (kg),
Floc (ml/1L) MBW (g) Feed/day (kg) Grain Pellet (kg)
Van n amei STD 13 1 pcs. / m2
Pr oduct ion : 8 , 9 7 1. 8 kg; M BW : 16 . 3 6 g SR: 8 3 . 9 %
FCR: 1. 0 ADG: 0 . 14 DOC: 113
Pond
Environment
( DO , pH , Temp , Trans , PO4-P ,
CO2 , TAN , NH3-N , NO2-N , NO3-N ,
Sal , Alk , Chlor-a , Floc , Bact , etc. )
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98 105 112 119 126 133
DOC (day)
ppm
Heterotrophic Autotrophic
PH comparison between Autotrophic and Heterotrophic System
6
7
8
9
10
1 7
13
19
25
31
37
43
49
55
61
67
73
79
85
91
97
10
3
10
9
11
5
DOC (day)
(pp
m)
pH Autotrop am pH Autotrop pm
PH Heterotrop am PH Heterotrop pm
Dissolved Oxygen Comparison between Autotrophic and
Heterotrophic System
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 97 105 113 121
DOC ( day )
( ppm )
DO Autotrophic AM DO Autotrophic PM
DO Heterotrophic AM DO Heterotrophic PM
Alkalinity – Algae & Biofloc
pH – Algae & Biofloc
DO – Algae & Biofloc
POND WATER ENVIRONMENT
Chandaeng, S. et al.(2005): Taw, N (2006)
More than 2,000 bacterial species were found in well-developed biofloc water Biolfocs may enhance immune activity, based on mRNA expression of six immune-related genes.
ProPO1, proPO2, PPAE, ran, mas and SP1
BIOFLOC MAY ENHANCE IMMUNE ACTIVITY
From – In-Kwon Jang, IWA International Water Congress, 2012, Busan, Korea
Dr. Lightner, GOAL 2012
EMS (Early Mortality Syndrome)/ AHPNS (Acute Hepatopancreatic Necrosis Syndrome)
BIOFLOC as possible solution for
EMS/AHPNS control at farm level
POSSIBLE SOLUTION FOR EMS/AHPNS AT
FARM LEVEL
(EMS Panel GOAL 2012 Bangkok)
PCR for EMS/AHPND
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
BIOFLOC BASIC MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS
FOR SHRIMP CULTURE
1 Semi-biofloc to Full biofloc system feasible
2 Use treated water only
3 Zero water exchange (only topping up)
4 Earthen to HDPE full or semi-lined ponds
5 Aerators to have pond water (biofloc) in suspension (22-24 hrs)
6 Correct aerators’ position and number very important
7 Excess sludge need to be removed –specially for full biofloc
8 Biofloc volume control (<15 ml/L)
9 Control C/N ratio to above >15
10 Molasses & Grain pellet required (Carbon source)
11 Operate in accordance with Carrying capacity of pond essential
(species/stocking density/pond type/operating system)
WHY BIOFLOC AS BIOSECURITY BIOFLOC SYSTEM BIOSECURITY
1. Zero water exchange (topping up only for water
lost due to siphoning & evaporation)
Low risk of virus entering culture ponds
through water source
2. Use treated water only – through reservoirs Modular system
3. Aeration full 22-24 hours in accordance with
pond carry capacity (full or semi-biofloc) to have
biofloc suspended in pond water.
Stable dissolved Oxygen (DO). Healthier
shrimps
4. Phytoplankton (algae) bloom & crash non-
existent as biofloc does not depend on sun light
for photosynthesis.
Stable environment. Low stress for
shrimps – healthier shrimps
5. Stable culture water environment –
DO and pH.
Stable environment. Low stress for
shrimps – healthier shrimps
6. Extra natural live feed – biofloc with unicellular
protein (protein 30 -50%)
Extra nutritious natural feed
7. More than 2,000 bacterial species were found in
well-developed biofloc water
Possibly a probiotic affect
8. Biofloc contains six immune related genes May enhance immune activity in shrimps
Vietnam
Malaysia
Myanmar
Guatemala Beliz Nicaragua
Israel
New Caleonia
BIOFLOC TECHNOLOGY WORLD WIDE
THANK YOU