Reka Bentuk Kurikulum & Pengurusan Pendidikan ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Reka Bentuk Kurikulum & Pengurusan Pendidikan ...
Reka Bentuk Kurikulum &Pengurusan Pendidikan Berasaskan
Hasil (OBE)
Nor K Noordin, Ph.DFakulti Kejuruteraan
Amir Affan Abdul Azim, Ph.DFakulti Perhutanan dan Alam Sekitar
([email protected])02.03.2022
At the end of this session, participants are able to:
•explain definition and process of OBE
•describe the different levels of learning outcomes
•differentiate three domains in learning taxonomy
•construct a good learning outcomes
Matlamat Program (PEO)
Hasil Pembelajaran Program (PO / PLO)
Hasil Pembelajaran Kursus(CO / CLO)
Hasil Pembelajaran Topik
Hasil Pembelajaran (LO)
Pernyataan umum yang menggambarkan kerjaya danpencapaian profesional yang disediakan oleh program kepadagraduan selepas tamat program pengajian.
Hasil pembelajaran khusus untuk program pengajian.Pengetahuan, kemahiran teknikal dan insaniah yang dapatdimanfaatkan oleh pelajar, setelah tamat pengajian
Hasil pembelajaran khusus untuk sesuatu kursus. Pengetahuan, kemahiran teknikal dan insaniah yang dapatdimanfaatkan oleh pelajar di akhir kursus
Hasil pembelajaran khusus bagi topik-topik yang terkandungdalam sesuatu kursus. Pengetahuan, kemahiran teknikal daninsaniah yang dapat dimanfaatkan oleh pelajar di akhir topik
Istilah umum yang boleh digunakan secara bergantian padamana-mana tahap hasil pembelajaran. Pernyataan tentangapa yang pelajar dapat lakukan setelah tamat pembelajaran.
COPPA Ed 2.0 2017
Area 7Area 1
Area2
Area 3Area 4
Area 5
Area 6
01
02
0304
05
06
07
Programme monitoring, review and continual quality improvement.
Programme management
Educational resources
Academic staffStudent selection
and support services.
Assessment of student learning.
Programme development and delivery
2. Curriculum Design and Delivery
3. Assessment of Students
4. Student Selection and Support Services
5. Academic Staff 6. Educational Resources
7. Programme Monitoring and Review
8. Leadership, Governance and Administration
9. Continual quality improvement.
1. Vision, Mission, PEO, PO
“A way of designing, developing, deliveringand documenting instruction in terms of its intended goals and outcomes” (Spady, 1988).
“….is a process that involves the restructuring of curriculum, assessment and reporting practices in education to reflect the achievement of high order learning and mastery rather than the accumulation of course credits” (Tucker, 2004)
Focu
s in
OB
E
A theory / philosophy of education
A systematic structure for curriculum, infrastructures and management system
A classroom practice including course delivery and assessments
Three Different Focuses in OBEScenario:1. Globalization Challenge
• Diversity of knowledge sources
• Market and employer demand
2. Graduate Qualities• Imbalance growth of
– Jasmani (Physical), – Emosi (Emotional), – Rohani (Spiritual),– Intelektual (Intellectual)– Teknologi (Technology)
• Examination oriented• Learning Skills are not
optimal
1. Perancangan / Semakan
2. Pembangunan & Reka bentuk
3. Pelaksanaan & Pemantauan
4. Penilaian
Kurikulum TahapAkademik
PEO
PO
Standard Program
Kurikulum
CO
AktivitiPdP
AktivitiPentaksiran
JPP
TaksonomiBloom
Kredit
KurikulumDokumentasiBukti
Survei awal dan akhir
Rancangan Pengajaran
Penilaian formatif
Penilaian sumatif
Skema pemarkahan
Portfolio pelajar
Rubrik penaksiran
Penaksiran & analisis
PenambahbaikanKualiti Berterusan
(CQI)
Semakankurikulum
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Defined by
Focused on
Organised around
Directed by
Content based
Teaching
Teacher centered
Surface learning
Evaluation
Traditional technologies
To …
Outcome based
Learning Student centered
Deep and meaningful learning
Assessment
New digital technologies
IT’S NOT WHAT WE TEACH, IT’S WHAT THE STUDENTS LEARN!
OBE addresses the following questions…
1 2
34
Teaching andLearning activities
How do we help our students to achieve it?
Assessments
How do we knowthey have achieved it?
Learning Outcomes
What do we want our students to have or able
to do?
CQIHow do we close the loop?
CQI at three different levels
Program Outcomes (PO)
Program Educational Objectives (PEO)
Mission & VisionStakeholders
AlumniAdvisory Committee
Course Outcomes (CO)
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
CQI
CQI
CQI
Analysis
Analysis
Analysis1 2 3
• Employer/Stakeholders do not match with graduates’ competencies
• Students main concern is GRADES but Employers’ concern are their abilities, attitudes and skills
• Traditional method is a PROCESS-based
• OBE is OUTCOME-basedInput Process Outcome
Why OBE?
3H
CognitiveThe Head
(1)
PsychomotorThe Hand
(2)
AffectiveThe Heart
(3)
Curriculum Approach
1 2
4 3
Curriculum as a body of knowledge to be
transmitted(Kelly, 1985)
Curriculum as an attempt to achieve certain ends in students – product (Tyler, 1949)
Curriculum as process(Stenhouse, 1975)
Curriculum as praxis: informed, committed
action (Grundy, 1987)
Process Based vs Outcomes
Based
Lecturer Centered vs
StudentCentered
Assumed vsAssured
Piece meal vsIntegrated
Curriculum Design
• From teacher-centered learning (TCL)
• Traditional teaching teacher owns” the knowledge and convey it to the students.
• Teacher brings the content and the answers into the classroom/ training room with him / her.
• to a student-centered learning (SCL)
• SCL Based teaching : students (trainee) to learn as much as possible.
• teacher as a coach who asks questions and provides guidelines for the acquisition of knowledge.
Paradigm Shift in the Education and Training Philosophy
Perkembangan badan pengetahuan (BoK), kajian pasaran, CQI, dan faktor-faktor lain yang berkaitan
Pengenalpastian dan penetapan Matlamat Program (PEO)
Pengenalpastian dan penetapan Hasil Pembelajaran Program (PO)
Reka bentuk kurikulum berteraskan penjajaran dan pencapaian PEO dan PO
Pengenalpastian dan penetapan Hasil Pembelajaran Kursus (CO)
Penetapan kandungan kursus dan Jumlah Jam Pembelajaran Pelajar (JJPP)
REKA
BEN
TUK
KURI
KULU
M
PROG
RAM
AK
ADEM
IK
What are Learning Outcome (LO) ?
“… think first about what is essential that students know or be able to do after the course or program – what students need to know and could make powerful use of to enhance their lives and more effectively contribute to society. We believe that such reflection will lead instructors to focus on a broad synthesis of abilities that combine
knowledge, skills and values into a whole that reflects how people really use knowledge.” (Mark Battersby, 1999)
Learning outcomes are statements that describe the knowledge or skills students should acquire by the end of a particular assignment, class, course, or program, and help students understand why that knowledge
and those skills will be useful to them. They focus on the context and potential applications of knowledge and skills, help students connect
learning in various contexts, and help guide assessment and evaluation.
Why Develop Learning Outcome (LO) ?
For Students For Instructors For Institution & Administrators
more connected to their learningand to the material of the course
process of developing LO itself offers an opportunity for reflection on the content of the course in the context of its potential applications
development of a coherent curriculum within a decentralized institution while maintaining instructor autonomy, and helps to ensure that students are prepared for future work and learning.
helps students draw connections between courses and other kinds of knowledge, enhancing student engagement
context of the learning will always be emphasized, and courses focus on the knowledge and skills that will be most valuable to the student now and in the future
LO reflect and support the contemporary nature and priorities of the university, enhancing student engagement, uncovering opportunities for interdisciplinary, and providing guidance and support for students with many different kinds of previous academic preparation.
understand the conditions and goals of their assessment
LO guides instructors to useful methods of assessment
LO provide structures from which courses and programs can be evaluated and can assist in program and curricular design, identify gaps or overlap in program offerings, and clarify instructional, programmatic, and institutional priorities.
LO allow instructors to set the standards by which the success of the course will be evaluated.
01
02
03
06
05
04
define the type and depth of learning, students are
expected to achieve
provide an objective benchmark for
formative, summative, and prior learning
assessment
clearly communicate expectations to
learners
clearly communicate graduates’ skills to the stakeholders
define coherent units of learning that can be further subdivided or modularized for classroom or for other delivery modes
guide and organize the instructor and the learner
Why are learning
outcomes important?
What is PEO? What is PO? What is CO?Broad statements describe the career and professional accomplishment that the program is preparing graduates to achieve
Statements that describe what students are expected to know and be able to do by the time of graduation.
These relate to the knowledge (C), skills (P)
and behaviours (A) that the student acquire in their
programs
Measurable statements what
students are expected to know and able to do by
the end of each individual
courses
Few years after Graduation – 3 to 5 years
Different Level of Learning Outcomes
Programme Outcomes (PO)
Course Outcomes (CO)/ Course Learning Outcomes
(CLO)
Weekly / Topic Outcomes
Upon graduation -10 UPM POs
Upon course completion Use Taxonomy ofLearning Domains (C/A/P)
Few years after Graduation – 3 to 5 years
.. able to demonstratecritical thinking skills to solve
.. able to explain the physical principles of ..
Competent engineers who are leaders in ..
.. able to explain Archimedes principle of ..
Employer Survey, Alumni Survey
Exit Survey, Prog.Survey
Sum/Form/Cont. Assessments
Upon topic completion Use appropriate Taxonomy ofLearning Domains (C/A/P)Sum/Form/Cont. Assessments
Assessment Methods in Different Levels of Learning Outcomes
Inte
rrel
ated
and
Com
plem
ent E
ach
Oth
er
Shor
t-ter
m
Out
com
esLo
ng-te
rm
Out
com
esVision and Mission of the
Institution
Programme Educational Objectives (PEO)
Hasil Pembelajaran Program (PO)Pernyataan yang menggambarkan pengetahuan, kemahiran dan tingkah laku yang perlu dicapai
oleh graduan setelah tamat pengajian
Knowledge (C)
Skills/Psychomotor
(P)
Affective/Attitude(A)
JKKU Ke-290
SenatKe-658
30 Januari2019
7 Feb. 2019
Cadangan pemetaandomain PO dan
deskripsi PO generikUPM berdasarkan
kluster hasilpembelajaran MQF
Edisi Kedua. Senat 658.11
• MQF Edisi Keduamengelompokkan lapan (8) domain hasil pembelajarankepada lima (5) kluster hasilpembelajaran yang perlu adadalam setiap program pengajian.
• Pengelompokan ini selaridengan aspirasi FalsafahPendidikan Kebangsaan(1961), Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025 dan PelanPembangunan PendidikanMalaysia 2015-2025 (Pendidikan Tinggi).
Semua permohonan Akreditasi Sementara (bagi program pengajian baharu) di UPM akan mengguna pakai MQF Edisi Kedua mulai 1 April 2019. Manakala, permohonan Akreditasi Penuh atau Audit Pengekalan (bagi program pengajian sedia ada) akan mengguna pakai MQF Edisi Kedua mulai 1 April 2020 [Pekeliling MQA Bil. 2/2018 bertarikh 20 Mac 2018]. Pemakaian perubahan dalam MQF Edisi Kedua ini terpakai kepada program pengajian yang bukan di bawah badan profesional, tiada dokumen standard dan standard program.
Numeracy skills
These are the quantitative skills that require learners to acquire increasingly higher levels of numerical abilities. It is acknowledged as an important living skill relevant in study, work and daily life. Within the MQF levels, this learning outcome may not be specifically mentioned for every level but it is expected that numerical skills are required as an outcome ought to be indicated for every specific programme.
financial
statistic
commission
marketing
mathematic
measure
budget
symbol
Fundamental/Analysis/Design/Project
1. Pelajar dapat mengaplikasi pengetahuan dan kefahaman tentang maklumat, fakta, prinsip, konsep dan teori secara sistematik dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
2. Pelajar boleh melaksanakan kemahiran kerja dengan alatan/kaedah/prosedur yang sesuai secara kompeten dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
3. Pelajar dapat menganalisis masalah, membangunkan strategi penyelesaian dan menggunakannya bagi menyelesaikan masalah dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
4. Pelajar boleh menyampaikan maklumat serta idea secara berkesan, melalui lisan atau bertulis dengan menggunakan bahasa yang sesuai.
5. Pelajar boleh berinteraksi, berkolaborasi dan bekerja secara berpasukan dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
6. Pelajar boleh mengamalkan sikap beretika, berintegriti dan profesional dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
7. Pelajar boleh menggunakan teknologi dan aplikasi digital secara beretika bagi menyelesaikan masalah dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
8. Pelajar dapat menggunakan pengetahuan dan kemahiran personal dalam aktiviti keusahawanan.9. Pelajar boleh memimpin dan memikul tanggungjawab secara profesional dalam bidang sains dan
teknologi kayu.10. Pelajar mempamerkan kemahiran kuantitatif dan numerasi yang relevan dalam pembelajaran, pekerjaan
dan aktiviti berkaitan dengan bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
Hasil Pembelajaran Program (PO) Contoh
•A goal of Bloom's Taxonomy is to motivate educators to focus on all three domains, creating a more holistic form of education.
Learning Domain
Cognitive
AffectivePsychomotor
Psychomotor Domain (Simpson’ Model, 1972)
ORIGINATION : Creating new movement patterns to fit a particular situation
ADAPTATION : Skills are well developed & can be modified to fit special requirements
COMPLEX OVERT RESPONSE : The skillful performance of complex movements
MECHANISM : Learned responses have become habitual
GUIDED RESPONSE : Early stages in learning a complex skill
SET : Readiness to act. It includes mental, physical and emotion sets
PERCEPTION : Ability to use sensory cues to guide motor activity
P7
P6
P5
P4
P3
P2
P1 Low
er o
rder
Hig
her
orde
r
C1Remember
C2Understand
C3Apply
C4Analyze
C5Evaluate
C6Create
P1Perception
P2Set
P3Response
P4Mechanism
P5Complex
Overt Response
P6Adaptation
P7Origination
A1Receiving
A2Responding
A3Valuing
A4Organization
A5Internalizing
Higher orderLower order
Psyc
hom
otor
Cog
nitiv
eA
ffect
iveKnowledge (C), skills (P) and behaviors (A)
should be mapped to the
learning domain in Blooms or
other Taxonomy
Must state the majorskills, knowledge,
attitude or ability that students will acquire
expressed in terms of measurable
and/or observable behaviors (hint:
ask yourself how you would test the
outcome
Each course will usually have between 3 to 5 major outcomes. (Garis Panduan Penulisan
Akademik, JPT, KPM)
Should be written in clear language and in the future
tense
These outcomes
should be the same across courses with
the same code
Begin with an action verb (e.g., write,
install, solve, and apply)
Characteristics of a Good Course Outcome
more general than objectives
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Development of Learning Outcomes• Includes:
– Action Verb • Based on Bloom Taxonomy action verbs (C-P-A)• Illustrate the level of thinking / motor skills / behavior
– Condition• Context in which level of thinking / motor skills / behavior is to occur
– Standard• Criteria of acceptable level of performance or referable standards
• Measurable by INSTRUCTORS and achievable by STUDENTS
• Suitable with included topics
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning– Cognitive, Psychomotor, Affective,
• Diploma (C3, P4, A3)• Undergraduate (C4, P4, A3)• Masters (C5/C6, P5/P6, A4/A5)• PhD (C6/C7, P6/P7, A5)
What level of learning should the subjects offer?
• Course Outcomes (CO) must be aligned to PO
• Must state level of learning taxonomy
• Must be written clearly– Action verb >
condition/performance > standard/ criteria
For each course/subject what are the outcomes?
• Must have at least V+C or V+S• Can have more than 1 action verb, BUT must measure them
• UPM only practice 1 action verb
Mentions particular learning domain (cognitive / psychomotor / affective)
Relates to the standards (level of attainment)
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Relevant
Time-bound
ObservableUsing particular assessment method
Develop using action verbs
Align to PO and PEO, and within course contents
According to student’s abilities
Achievement can be demonstrated
Can be attained within the given learning time
Can be applied, practiced and observed
GOOD ACTIONVERBS
Avoid these words- understand - appreciate- know- learn- aware- familiar
Soft SkillsA cluster of personality traits
Skills, abilities, traits pertaining to personality, attitude and behavior
Soft Skills
CTPSCS
TS
EMNS
LL
KK
LS
Problem Solving & Scientific Skill
Communication Skill
Social skills & responsibility
Professionalism, values, attitudes and ethics
Digital skill, Lifelong Learning & Information Management
Personal & Entrepreneurial skill
Leadership Skill
Numerical Skill
Learning Domain Action verb
Level(Domain + Soft Skills)
Example
(Action verb – Condition – Standard)
Cognitive (C)
explain (menerang)
relate (menghubung kait)
compare (membanding)
C2, CS
C4, LL
C5, CTPS, NS
Menerangkan struktur dan fungsi sel yang terkandung di dalamkayu keras
Menghubung kait pembentukan sel kayu dengan ekologi persekitaran
Membandingkan spesies kayu berpandukan kepada sifat anatomi kuantitatif sel salur
Psychomotor (P)
perform (melaksana)
build (membangun)
P3, LL
P7, CTPS, NS
Melaksanakan pengecaman kayu berpandukan kekundi dikotomus
Membangunkan pangkalan data sistematik kayu daripadasampel kayu yang diekstrak dari hutan
Affective (A)
justify (memberi justifikasi)
solve (menyelesai)
A3, EM
A4, KK, LS
Memberi justifikasi kepentingan pengecaman kayu dalam pengurusan hutan
Menyelesaikan masalah penggunaan spesies kayu dalam projek perumahan kos rendah
• In a course, it can be C+P+A or C+P or C+A• “C” and “P” CAN be written together with “SS” (eg. C2, CS); (eg. P4, TS), • “CTPS” CAN be added when there’s HIGHER ORDER “C” (C4, C5, C6) and/or “P” (P4, P5, P6, P7)• “NS” CAN be added to all “C” and/or “P” level (if numeracy skill is involved in technical skill of a course)• It is NOT recommended to assign “A” ALONE. BETTER EMBED “A” together in “SS” (CS, TS, EM, LL, KK, LS)• It is NOT recommended to assign “A” with CTPS (difficulty to assess “A” in problem solving and scientific skills)
53
Constructive Alignment
“A good teaching system aligns teaching method and assessment to the learning activities stated in the objectives, so that all aspects of this system are in accord in supporting appropriate student learning. This system is called constructive alignment, based as it is on the twin principles of constructivism in learning and alignment in teaching.”
John Biggs (1999)
TOT: Setting of CEP and CEA in Course Delivery and Assessment @ UMPby Nor K Noordin 08 Feb 2022
EXAMPLE
EXAMPLEConstructive Alignment
25 TOT: Setting of CEP and CEA in Course Delivery and Assessment @ UMPby Nor K Noordin 08 Feb 2022
1. Pelajar dapat mengaplikasi pengetahuan dan kefahaman tentang maklumat, fakta, prinsip, konsep dan teori secara sistematik dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
2. Pelajar boleh melaksanakan kemahiran kerja dengan alatan/kaedah/prosedur yang sesuai secara kompeten dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
3. Pelajar dapat menganalisis masalah, membangunkan strategi penyelesaian dan menggunakannya bagi menyelesaikan masalah dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
4. Pelajar boleh menyampaikan maklumat serta idea secara berkesan, melalui lisan atau bertulis dengan menggunakan bahasa yang sesuai.
5. Pelajar boleh berinteraksi, berkolaborasi dan bekerja secara berpasukan dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
6. Pelajar boleh mengamalkan sikap beretika, berintegriti dan profesional dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
7. Pelajar boleh menggunakan teknologi dan aplikasi digital secara beretika bagi menyelesaikan masalah dalam bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
8. Pelajar dapat menggunakan pengetahuan dan kemahiran personal dalam aktiviti keusahawanan.9. Pelajar boleh memimpin dan memikul tanggungjawab secara profesional dalam bidang sains dan
teknologi kayu.10. Pelajar mempamerkan kemahiran kuantitatif dan numerasi yang relevan dalam pembelajaran, pekerjaan
dan aktiviti berkaitan dengan bidang sains dan teknologi kayu.
Hasil Pembelajaran Program (PO)
Circuit TheoryWrite your most dominant CO
CO1
CO2
Able to analyse DC and AC circuits using the principle of circuit theory
CO3
CO4
Able to determine First and Second Order circuit response
Able to apply Laplace transformation in circuit analysis
Able to evaluate for optimal solution for any given AC/DC circuit
26
Circuit Theory
CO1
CO2
Able to analyse DC and AC circuits using the principle of circuit theory {PO1, C3]
CO3
CO4
Able to to work in team to determine the First and Second Order circuit response [PO2, P5], [PO5, A3]
Able to apply Laplace transformation in circuit analysis [PO1, C4]
Able to determine the optimal solution for any given AC/DC circuit[PO3, C5]
26
Identify PO for each CO and its level of taxonomy
ASSESSMENT
LAB WORKe.g. Ask students to work in group using
Simulink to solve 1st/2nd order ckt
ASSIGNMENT(Case Study/ PBL)
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3130/jaa
be.14.679
What is appropriate?
EXAMINATION/TESTe.g. Translate an
appliance into circuit diagram?
e.g. Given a complex circuit, analyse possible methods to solve it, whyyou choose that method?
31
1. Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation (COPPA) 2. Malaysian Qualifications Framework3. Garis Panduan Pembangunan Program Akademik Universiti Awam4. Programme Standards: Accounting5. Programme Standards: Art and Design6. Programme Standards: Biotechnology7. Programme Standards: Computing8. Programme Standards: Creative Multimedia9. Programme Standards: Dental Specialties10. Programme Standards: Early Childhood Education11. Programme Standards: Education12. Programme Standards: Finance13. Programme Standards: Language14. Programme Standards: Medical and Health Science15. Engineering Programme Accreditation Standard 202016. …..Garis Panduan Badan Akreditasi yang lain-lain
Rujukan / Panduan