NaLi2PO4:Eu3+ based novel luminescent red phosphor
Transcript of NaLi2PO4:Eu3+ based novel luminescent red phosphor
ORIGINAL PAPER
NaLi2PO4:Eu3+ based novel luminescent red phosphor
P D Sahare* and M Singh
Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110 007, India
Received: 06 November 2013 / Accepted: 13 February 2014 / Published online: 5 March 2014
Abstract: Eu3? doped NaLi2PO4 red luminescent phosphor has been synthesized by solid state reaction and its phase
purity has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. Optical properties of the phosphor have been investigated and the
effect of dopant (Eu3?) concentration (0.1–3.0 mol%) has been observed. Excitation spectra of the phosphor NaLi2-
PO4:Eu3? show a very efficient absorbance band corresponding to the common allowed transition 7F0 ? 5L6 occurring at
393 nm, while the luminescence spectra exhibit prominent emission peak centered at 702 nm (5D0 ? 7F4) in pure red
region. Color purity of this red phosphor has been calculated and found to be around 99.9 %, which is very close to that of
commercial red phosphor Y2O3:Eu3?. Luminescence studies of the phosphor show excellent stability with respect to
excitation energy. Chromatic investigations have also been performed using emission spectrum and some important
chromatic parameters are calculated using CIE-1931 color calculator in order to find potential application of the phosphor.
Keywords: NaLi2PO4:Eu3?; Photoluminescence; Red phosphor; Color purity; Color-coordinates; WLEDs
PACS Nos.: 07.07.Hj; 32.50.?d; 33.50.Dq
1. Introduction
In last few decades, a lot of research has been carried out on
rare-earth (RE) doped various inorganic/organic phosphors
for their various applications. Among the dopants, usually
RE and transition metal ions, Eu3? is attractive dopant for
their unique optical properties, such as, almost a narrow band
light emission, long lifetime and higher luminescence effi-
ciency, etc., as compared to other dopant materials [1–5].
Therefore, Eu3?/Eu2? doped phosphors have been studied
extensively for their potential applications in light emitting
devices, displays, solid state lasers, optical amplifiers, sen-
sors and optoelectronics devices etc. [6–12].
Orthophosphates ABPO4 (where A and B are mono and
divalent cations, respectively) and oxide glasses (such as
borates), phosphates and fluorophosphate doped with Eu3?/
Eu2? ions are reported as efficient optical materials [13–
21]. These phosphors emit red and bluish emissions when
doped with Eu3? and Eu2? ion species, respectively [22–
24]. Mostly, Eu3? ion doped phosphors are reported as red
light emitting phosphors, such as, PKBAEu [25],
M6AlP5O20 (M = Sr/Ba/Mg) [26], LAFB [27] and PKSA
[28], show dominant emission peaks in the spectral ranges
611–620 and 587–594 nm, corresponding to the electric-
dipole allowed 5D0 ? 7F2 and magnetic-dipole allowed5D0 ? 7F1 transitions, respectively. But the phosphors,
e.g., SABBL [29] and Eu3?-Doped BaFCl [30] exhibit a
dominant peak centered at around 700 nm attributed to the5D0 ? 7F4 transition. The spectral ranges (611–620 and
587–594 nm) come under the radish–orange visible spec-
tral region, while the pure red color ranges from 620 to
750 nm.
The present commercial phosphors used for a ‘‘cool
white’’ fluorescent lamps are two rare earth doped phos-
phors, one LaPO4:Tb3?, Ce3? for green and blue emissions
and another Y2O3:Eu3? for red. These are likely the most
common type of fluorescent lamp phosphors in use today.
This approach is little better, as it exhibits better color
rendering index (CRI 89) in comparison to the SUN light
(CRI 82) but still poor than highest achievable (CRI 100).
This may be due to lack of proper combination of the
emission colors of solid-state lighting (blue/green/red)
source(s) used in compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) or in
white light emitting diodes (WLEDs), especially, red
phosphor. Now most of CFLs are being replaced by*Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]; pdsahare@
yahoo.co.in
Indian J Phys (June 2014) 88(6):621–630
DOI 10.1007/s12648-014-0459-9
� 2014 IACS
WLEDs as the later ones are energy efficient and envi-
ronmental friendly (mercury free). Expected improvement
in the next generation WLEDs would be through a com-
bination of an ultraviolet (UV) or blue-emitting chip and
phosphors as solid-state lighting sources. This has, there-
fore, attracted considerable interests. Recently, thus much
more attention has been focused on the generation of white
light, through a better combination of red, green and blue
phosphors with UV or near-UV LEDs. From this point of
view, it is important to improve the efficiency and color
render index of red, green and blue color emitting phos-
phors having their prominent excitation wavelengths in
range of 350–410 nm [31, 32].
In present work, we have reported an efficient pure red
(emission wavelength around 702 nm) phosphor based on
Eu3? doped NaLi2PO4 system synthesized through solid
state reaction. Generally, Eu3? ions doped phosphors show
most prominent emission peak at around 618 nm
(5D0 ? 7F2) which is in orange-red region while in present
orthophosphate most prominent emission peak is centered
at around 702 nm (5D0 ? 7F4) which is really a pure red
light. Both transitions are electric-dipole allowed transi-
tions and their emission response and efficiency depend on
crystal field of the host around Eu3? ions. Different nature
of the emission spectrum (peaking at around 702 nm) of
this phosphor has been attributed to different crystal field
exerted on Eu3? ions. The better chromatic coordinate
shows its novelty and potential use as a pure red phosphor
for better color rendering WLEDs.
2. Experimental details
NaLi2PO4:Eu3? phosphor was synthesized through solid
state reaction with starting materials LiOH�H2O (CDH,
99.5 %) and NaH2PO4�2H2O (CDH, 99 %) and the impu-
rity salt EuCl3�6H2O (CDH, 99.5 %). The samples were
prepared taking into consideration the following chemical
reaction:
2LiOH � H2O + NaH2PO4 + 2H2O
þ EuCl3 � mol%ð Þ �!heatingNaLi2PO4 :Eu3þ þ 6H2O:
AR grade LiOH and NaH2PO4 (molar ratio 2:1) and the
appropriate amount of the impurity (x = 0.1–3.0 mol%)
were mixed consistently using agate mortar and pestle in
presence of ethanol for better mixing. A temperature
controlled programmable furnace with temperature
stability better than ±1 K was used for the samples
synthesis. Mixture of the precursors was heated at 673 K
for 12 h in alumina boat and cooled slowly at room
temperature, grinded in the form of fine powder and heated
again at 1,073 K for the same period. The ingot thus
obtained was grinded again to get fine powder. All these
samples used for further characterization were in the form
of white powder.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the powder samples
were recorded using a high-resolution (D8 Discover Bruker)
X-ray diffractometer, equipped with a point detector (scin-
tillation counter), employing monochromatized Cu-Ka1
radiation obtained through a Gobel mirror with a scan rate of
1.0 s/step and step size of 0.02 at room temperature. High-
resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM)
images of the samples were taken using a (Philips Tecnai G2
30) transmission electron microscope (TEM) operating at an
accelerating voltage of 300 keV. Thermo gravimetric ana-
lysis of the samples was carried out using (Perkin Elmer
Diamond) TG/DTA system from room temperature to
1,273 K at a heating rate of 10 K/min. Fourier transforma-
tion infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a FTIR spec-
trometer (Spectrum RX I Perkin Elmer). Conventional
excitation and emission spectra of the powder samples were
recorded using (Horiba Jobin–Yvon Fluorolog) modular
spectrofluorimeter at room temperature using a Xenon lamp
as continuous source. Fluorescence decay curves were also
taken on (Horiba Jobin–Yvon FluoroCube) single photon
counting system. The decay curves were theoretically fitted
by using the least square method. Lifetime was then calcu-
lated from these decay curves.
3. Results and discussion
Figure 1(a) is stick XRD pattern for the data from JCPDS #
45-1348 for NaLi2PO4 crystalline material, while
Fig. 1(b)–(e) show experimental patterns for the synthe-
sized Eu3? doped NaLi2PO4 crystalline materials with
impurity concentrations 0.1, 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 mol%,
respectively. The diffraction patterns are indexed to
orthorhombic crystal system of NaLi2PO4 space group
Pmnb(62) and JCPDS # 45-1348 [33]. Stick pattern of the
standard data has also been plotted along with the experi-
mental data for matching and identifying impurity/sec-
ondary phases in the diffraction pattern of the powder
material. No diffraction peaks of any phase related to the
impurity have been observed when doping level is lower
than 1.0 mol%, as seen in Fig. 1. However, when the
impurity concentration increases to 2.0 mol% or more, new
diffraction peaks are found growing and intensity increases
with doping concentration. These new diffraction peaks
have been attributed to formation of impurity clusters
related to monoclinic phase of Eu2O3 (JCPDF# 43-1009).
In order to confirm the prospect of substitution of Eu3? for
Li/Na ions in as prepared NaLi2PO4 samples, angular shift
d(2h) for peak corresponding to the plane (2 2 0) reflections
as a function of dopant Eu3? ions concentration has been
622 P D Sahare and M Singh
observed and illustrated in Fig. 2(a). Magnified region
around peak corresponding to plane (2 2 0) is also shown in
Fig. 2(b). The peaks are plotted in different line styles and
are (solid curve) for 0.1, (dash with two doted curve) for
1.0, (dash with single dotted curve) for 2.0 and (dashed
curve) for 3.0 mol%. It could be clearly seen that the peak
position corresponding to this plane (2 2 0) has got shifted
significantly with concentration of Eu3? ions increasing. It
demonstrates effective substitution of Eu3? for Li/Na ions
in lattice of crystalline NaLi2PO4 powder. Rietveld
refinement has also been done in order to confirm the
possibility of substitution of Eu3? ions for host ions
(Li/Na) by analyzing variations in structure parameters of
powder material [34, 35]. Table 1 shows the variation in
cell parameters with dopant concentration. The results are
also compared with that of the nominally pure NaLi2PO4
material (JCPDS # 45-1348). It is observed that the cell
parameters decreased with dopant concentration. This
demonstrates the presence of an effective substitution of
Eu3? ions in host materials. It is also observed that inten-
sity of peaks and cell volume (Table 1) gradually
decreased due to decreased crystallinity of the materials
with addition of Eu2O3 phase [36]. On the basis of all
above results, it is observed that incorporation of more and
more Eu3? ions in NaLi2PO4 lattice replaces Na?/Li? ions
at low concentrations. At the same time oxygen molecules
from surrounding atmosphere diffuse due to high temper-
atures and impurity phase (Eu2O3) clusters are formed and
grow more in number and size with concentration and time.
Thus as the concentration increases (beyond the doping
level *2.0 mol%), they fall out of the matrix to form
clusters.
Fig. 1 (a) is the stick pattern for the data from the JCPDS # 45-1348.
XRD patterns for materials having impurity concentrations (b) 0.5,
(c) 1.0, (d)2.0 and (e) 3.0, respectively are also shown. The peaks
corresponding to the Eu2O3 impurity phase are indicated by the solid
square (filled diamond)
(a) (b)
Fig. 2 Shifts in peak positions in the XRD patterns of NaLi2PO4
phosphor for different Eu3? impurity concentration. (a) is plot of
d(2h) of the peak corresponding (2 2 0) plane as a function of Eu3?
impurity concentration. (b) is magnified region of XRD patterns
around the peak corresponding to plane (2 2 0) for different Eu3?
impurity concentration: (straight curve) for 0.1 (dashed with two
dotted curve) for 1.0 (dashed with single dotted curve) for 2.0 and
(dashed curve) for 3.0 mol%
Table 1 Variation in cell perimeters of NaLi2PO4 phosphor with
Eu3? dopant concentration
Sample Lattice parameters Cell volume
(cm3)a b c
Reported work
NaLi2PO4 [29] 6.8770 9.9770 4.9255 337.95
Present work
NaLi2PO4:Eu (x mol%)
x = 0.1 6.8798 9.9870 4.9275 338.56
x = 0.5 6.8725 9.9825 4.9295 338.18
x = 1.0 6.8735 9.9828 4.9265 338.04
x = 2.0 6.8730 9.9775 4.9276 337.97
x = 3.0 6.8685 9.9725 4.9252 337.36
Novel luminescent red phosphor 623
The morphology of doped NaLi2PO4:Eu3? has been
characterized by TEM. TEM micrographs are shown in
Fig. 3. Mono-dispersed star like particles could be seen
here. The average particles size is observed to be around
1.5 lm in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) show better resolution of a
single particle. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED)
of the particle as shown in Fig. 3(c), exhibits regular dif-
fraction points well indexed to orthorhombic structure of
NaLi2PO4 and is in good agreement with the observed
XRD patterns. Incorporation of impurity in the material has
been confirmed by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS)
spectra and all EDS peaks corresponding to impurity and
host elements could very well be observed in the EDS
spectrum given in Fig. 4. Wt% and at.% of constituent
atoms are also given in inset.
TG/DTA of mixture of precursors has been taken to
understand diffusion process during synthesis and to
determine temperatures for this process. TG/DTA curves
(recorded for temperature range 323–1,273 K) for prepar-
ing NaLi2PO4:Eu3? (2.0 mol%) phosphor is shown in
Figs. 5(a) and 5(b). It is observed in this figure that the
sample shows an endothermic peak for DTA in Fig. 5(a) in
temperature range from 323 to 473 K, which is consistent
with enormous weight loss (about 30 %) shown by TGA in
Fig. 5(b) in the same temperature range. This observation
could be attributed to thermal release of water of crystal-
lization from ingredients and also more water molecules
due to their decomposition. Upon increasing temperature
up to 1,273 K, two endothermic peaks have been observed,
one at around 855 K and another broad peak around
1,085 K in DTA curve. The peak centered at around 855 K
is related to solid state reaction occurring among precursors
Fig. 3 TEM image of Eu3?
doped NaLi2PO4 phosphor:
(a) is low resolution image;
(b) is high resolution (enlarged
view) of the image of a single
particle and (c) is a SAED
pattern
Fig. 4 A typical EDS pattern of Eu3? doped (2.0 mol%) NaLi2PO4
phosphor. Elemental analysis (in at.% and wt%) of material is also
given in the inset
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
375 500 625 750 875 1000 1125 1250
-16
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
Hea
t flo
w (
mW
)
Mas
s lo
ss (
%)
Endo
350 K
855 K
1085 K
a
b
Temperature (K)
Fig. 5 TG/DTA curves of the mixture of precursors for preparing
Eu3? doped (2.0 mol%) NaLi2PO4 phosphor. (a), (b) are for DTA and
TGA, respectively
624 P D Sahare and M Singh
to form NaLi2PO4 phosphor and later one centered at
1,085 K is related to formation of the impurity phase
Eu2O3 for higher concentration of impurity. For nominally
pure sample 1,085 K peak is not observed. It could also be
seen from TGA curve that there is only slight weight loss
(0.91 %) at high temperature range (750–1,150 K) could
be attributed to release of water molecules formed during
reaction and their compensation by oxygen diffusion to
form Eu2O3 phase [37]. Formation of impurity phase
(Eu2O3) is also supported by XRD results.
FT-IR spectra of NaLi2PO4:Eu3? sample doped with
2.0 mol% and that of undoped sample are shown in
Figs. 6(a) and 6(b), respectively. Typically, IR absorption
band of (PO4)3- group has two absorption bands in ranges
of 1,120–940 and 650–540 cm-1 [38]. In present phosphor
the phosphate group exhibit strong characteristic absorption
bands centered at around 1,043 and 588 cm-1 which have
been assigned to stretching and bending vibration modes of
(PO4)3- group, respectively. However, it is observed from
FTIR spectra some irrelevant bands at 1,629 and
3,437 cm-1 that could be attributed to (OH)- content due to
adsorption of water molecules at powder surface when the
sample is in contact with atmospheric air [39–41].
Excitation spectra of Eu3? (2.0 mol%) doped NaLi2PO4
recorded at room temperature are shown in Figs. 7(a)–
7(c) for different characteristic major emission bands
peaking at 593, 618 and 702 nm. In these spectra common
f–f transition lines (as absorption bands) have been
observed at 318, 361, 376, 381, 393, 464, and 524 nm.
These bands have been assigned to direct absorption bands
of Eu3? ions from ground state 7F0 to excited states 5H4,5D4, 5G2, 5G3, 5L6, 5D2, and 5D1, respectively. These states
match well with the similar bands reported in literature
[42]. Among all absorbance bands, most intense band has
been found to be at around 393 nm corresponding to the
transition of 7F0 ? 5L6 energy level.
Normally, light corresponding to 393 and 465 nm bands
are used as exciting sources to obtained the emission
spectra of Eu3? ions doped phosphors which give promi-
nent emission peak at around 618 nm corresponding to
electric-dipole allowed 5D0 ? 7F2 hypersensitive allowed
transition that followed DJ = 2 selection rule [25, 27, 28,
43]. It is well known that host matrix environment around
Eu3? ions and excitation energy could significantly influ-
ence emission intensity of electric-dipole allowed5D0 ? 7F2 and 5D0 ? 7F4 transitions. In order to optimize
the appropriate excitation energy of phosphor, it has been
excited by different excitation wavelengths. The emission
spectra of NaLi2PO4:Eu3? excited by these wavelengths,
i.e., 361, 382, 393 and 465 nm are as shown in Figs. 8(a)–
8(d), respectively. The spectra consist of five characteris-
tics peaks centers at around 580, 593, 618, 653, and
702 nm corresponding to the allowed transition 5D0 ? 7FJ
(J = 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4). There is no significant shift in
emission peak positions of the emission spectra. However,
the corresponding intensities increased for excitation
wavelengths in the spectral range 361–393 nm but
decreased rapidly on excitation with 465 nm. The emission
spectra for samples with different impurity concentrations
in the range (0.1–3.0 mol%) are also shown in Fig. 9(a).
The spectra are plotted with different line styles and are
given by (dashed curve) for 0.1, (dotted curve) for 0.5,
(dash with single dotted curve) for 1.0, (solid curve) for 2.0
and (dash with double doted curve) for 3.0 mol%. Varia-
tions of respective intensities and the respective peak
intensity ratios of 702 nm peak to 618 nm peaks with
impurity concentrations have also been shown in Fig. 9(b).
The curves for intensity variations have been denoted by,
filled diamond, filled circle and filled square symbols for
618, 653 and 702 nm emission peaks, respectively, while
Fig. 6 FTIR spectra: (a), (b) represents spectra for doped (2.0 mol%)
and undoped NaLi2PO4 phosphors, respectively
Fig. 7 Excitation spectra of Eu3? doped (2.0 mol%) NaLi2PO4 at
different emission wavelengths: (a) 593, (b) 618 and (c) 702 nm
Novel luminescent red phosphor 625
the ratio curve is denoted by filled triangle symbol. It could
be seen here that not only intensities of respective peaks
vary and saturate after impurity concentration beyond
*2.0 mol% but also their ratio vary. Careful observation
reveals that there is also some red shift up to this con-
centration but for 3.0 mol% concentration it again shifts a
bit towards blue at which the impurity starts clustering.
These changes thus may be attributed to quantum con-
finement of these clusters. Amongst these, the selection
rules make 5D0 ? 7F4 transition (702 nm) is of particular
interest. It is very interesting that this 5D0 ? 7F4 transition
is electric-dipole allowed hypersensitive transition and
therefore, it is also sensitive to coordination environment of
Eu3? ions in this system, while intensity of the magnetic-
dipole allowed 5D0 ? 7F1 and 5D0 ? 7F3 transitions
hardly vary with crystal-field strength around the Eu3?
ions. Concentration of Eu3? ions has been varied from 0.1
to 3.0 mol% to optimize the appropriate dopant concen-
tration in matrix of NaLi2PO4 phosphor. On increasing
Eu3? dopant concentrations, luminescence centers
increased and enhanced luminescence intensity. It is
observed from Fig. 9b, that the sample doped with
2.0 mol% of Eu3? ions gives maximum emission intensity
and decreased beyond this concentration. With higher
dopant concentration, the emission intensity decreases due
to non-radiative relaxation process which is due to cross
relaxation among the neighboring Eu3? ions [44].
It is observed in Fig. 9(a) that only emissions from level5D0 are taking place in our material indicating that the
emissions from 5D2 and 5D1 are quenched. This may be
occurring due to a cross-relaxation process, which involves
two Eu3? ions depopulates 5DJ (J = 1, 2) level and thus
quenches 5DJ emission in favor of lower energy 5D0 level
emission. In process, Eu3? ions at 5DJ (J = 1, 2) states
transfer their energy to neighboring Eu3? ions at ground
state (7F0). This could be represented as (5DJ–5D0) ?
(7F0–7FJ).
Therefore, the possible cross-relaxations occurring for
Eu3? ions may be represented as follows [45, 46]:
Eu3þ 5D1
� �+ Eu3þ 7F0 ! Eu3þ 5D0
� �+ Eu3þ 7F3
� �and
Eu3þ 5D2
� �+ Eu3þ 7F0
� �! Eu3þ 5D0
� �+ Eu3þ 7F5
� �:
Thus, closely matched energy difference between 5D1, 5D2
and 5D0 levels and 7F3, 7F5 and 7F0 levels makes these
processes possible [45, 46]. Besides cross-relaxation pro-
cess, luminescence from 5DJ levels can be quenched also
by high-energy lattice phonons leading to multiphonon
relaxation process [47]. Cross-relaxation can occur
between energy levels of the same Eu3? ion which happens
to have two pairs of energy levels separated by same
amount of energy. By this process original system (in
Fig. 8 Emission spectra of Eu3? doped NaLi2PO4 for different
excitation wavelengths: (a) 361, (b) 382, (c) 393 and (d) 465 nm
(a)
(b)
Fig. 9 (a) shows the emission spectra (for kex = 393 nm) for
NaLi2PO4 samples with different impurity concentrations in the
range (0.1–3.0 mol%): (dashed line) for 0.1, (dotted curve) for 0.5,
(dashed with single dotted curve) for 1.0, (solid curve) for 2.0 and
(dashed with double dotted curve) for 3.0 mol%). (b) represents
variations of respective intensities and peak intensity ratios of 702 to
618 nm peaks with impurity concentrations. The curves for intensity
variations have been denoted by filled diamond, filled square and
filled circle symbols for 618, 653 and 702 nm emission peaks,
respectively, while the ratio curve is denoted by filled triangle
626 P D Sahare and M Singh
excited state) loses energy by obtaining lower state and
another system acquires energy by going to a higher state.
Two energy gaps may be equal or can be balanced by one
or two phonons. It is generally a dominating factor in
nonradiative relaxations at high concentrations.
Figure 10 shows schematic energy level diagram of
allowed transition levels for Eu3? ions involved in emis-
sion process. Excited electrons migrate into the first excited
metastable singlet state 5D0 from successive excited states
without any visible emissions. Non-radioactive energy
transfer has been attributed to high phonon energy of the
host and relatively small energy gaps between 5L6, 5D3, 5D2
and 5D1 states. Although, emission spectra show narrow
peaks of Eu3? due to shielding of 4f orbitals by nearest 5s2
and 5p6 orbitals [48]. Allowed transitions between 5D0
level to Stark levels of 7FJ are well resolved for low con-
centration level of doping (0.1–1.0 mol%). However, for
higher concentrations, beyond 2.0 mol%, Eu3? doped
phosphor shows Stark level peak positions for 5D0 ? 7Fj
transitions which are not well resolved, especially,5D0 ? 7F0,1,2 and they merge in a broad band due to
decreased energy level separations with an increasing
doping level.
A representative photoluminescent (PL) decay curve of
NaLi2PO4:Eu3? phosphor monitored at 702 nm is shown in
Fig. 11. PL decay curves taken at room temperature, have
been fitted to a single exponential function (dotted line) as
I = Io�exp(-t/s), where, Io is initial intensity and s is 1/e
lifetime of the transition level. Lifetimes corresponding to
Eu3? for 5D0 ? 7F4 (detected at 702 nm) have been
determined for different concentrations (0.5–3.0 mol%). It
is, however, found that there is no appreciable change in the
decay curves and thus in lifetimes with impurity concen-
tration in this range. 1/e lifetime (s) has been found to be
12.8 ns.
Emission spectra of phosphor with optimized impurity
concentration (2.0 mol%) and excited at wavelengths 361,
382, 393 and 465 nm have been investigated through the
Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) 1931 color
calculator. The various color parameters such as chromatic
coordinates (x, y), correlated color temperature (CCT) and
distance to the Planckian (black body curve) locus (Duv),
etc. play an important role in designing a CFL lamp or a
white light emitting diode (WLED). These parameters were
evaluated using CIE 1931 color calculator [49]. Duv is a
measure of distance of a (x, y) point from black body locus
in UV space. For standard white light LEDs are generally
required Duv to be below 0.0020 and the chromaticity
coordinates (x = 0.331, y = 0.329). CCT is an important
characteristic parameter for evaluating visible light emitted
from a phosphor which is a specification of the color
appearance of light as compared to an ideal black-body
radiator reference source at a particular temperature.
Black-body spectrum is considered as an ideal spectrum of
day light. Therefore, distance Duv from Planckian locus to
color coordinate (U0, V0) indicates how close tested light
source is to the ideal source and its CCT [50].
Fig. 10 Schematic energy level diagram of Eu3? ions in the lattice of
NaLi2PO4
1.3x10-8 1.4x10-8 1.5x10-8
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Inte
nsity
(ar
b. u
nits
)
Time (s)
Fig. 11 Representative decay curve for NaLi2PO4:Eu3? (2.0 mol%).
The emission was monitored at 702 nm for recording the decay curve
Table 2 Color coordinates, Duv and correlated color temperature
(CCT) for the 361, 382, 393, and 465 nm excitation wavelengths
k (nm) (x, y) (U0, V0) CCT (K) Color
purity (%)
361 (0.6044, 0.3414) (0.4106, 0.5218) 1,172 86.2
382 (0.6109, 0.3430) (0.4146, 0.5237) 1,152 99.6
393 (0.6298, 0.3589) (0.4246, 0.5359) 1,106 99.9
465 (0.6421, 0.3534) (0.4312, 0.5340) 1,075 99.8
Novel luminescent red phosphor 627
Fig. 12 VIBGYOR emission spectra of Eu3? doped (2.0 mol%) NaLi2PO4. for different excitation wavelengths: (a) 361, (b) 382, (c) 393 and
(d) 465 nm, respectively
Fig. 13 CIE-1930 chromatic
color space diagram showing
the chromatic coordinates of the
Eu3? doped NaLi2PO4 phosphor
excited at different
wavelengths, filled circle 361,
filled inverted triangle 382,
filled square 393 and filled
triangle 465 nm
628 P D Sahare and M Singh
Color purity of phosphor can be calculated taking into
account average of (x, y) coordinates relative to the coor-
dinates of illuminates and dominant wavelength.
Color purity ¼
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiðx� xiÞ2 � ðy� yiÞ2
q
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiðxd � xiÞ2 � ðyd � yiÞ2
q � 100
where (x, y) and (xi, yi) are color coordinates of light source
and CIE white illuminate Cs (0.3101, 0.3162), respectively
and (xd, yd) are color coordinates of dominant wavelength
kd [48]. Color coordinates, Duv, CCT and color purity for
different excitations (361, 382, 393 and 465 nm) have been
summarized in Table 2. Better color visualization can be
seen from VIBGYOR emission spectra excited by different
excitation wavelengths as shown in Fig. 12(a), for 361,
(b) for 382, (c) for 393 and (d) for 465 nm. It can be
observed only relative intensity change while the peak
positions do not change appreciably. Thus change in CCT
values could be attributed to the change in intensity of
orange-red lines in emission spectra rather than change in
their peak positions on excitation by different excitation
wavelengths. CIE chromatic diagram shows a minor
change in chromatic coordinates (x, y) in red region as
shown in Fig. 13. Enlarged view of relevant portion of the
diagram has also been shown for better clarity. Present
phosphor shows color stability, since emission color doesn’t
change with excitation energy. Color purity of synthesized
NaLi2(PO)4:Eu3? phosphor doped with 2.0 mol% impurity
concentration has been calculated to be 99.9 % which is
better than LaPO4:Eu (99 %) and ZnAl2O4:Eu (93 %) pre-
pared by different techniques [51, 52] and very close to the
standard red oxide phosphor Y2O3:Eu films (100 %) pre-
pared by spray pyrolysis technique [53].
4. Conclusions
Pure red emission phosphor based on Eu3? doped ortho-
phosphate NaLi2PO4 has been synthesized through high
temperature solid-state reaction. Sample doped with 2 mol%
of Eu3? give a curiously intense and narrow emission at
702 nm corresponding to 5D0–7F4 electric-dipole transition
when sample has been excited at 393 nm. On excitation by
different excitation energy, emission peak positions do not
change while the intensity is varied. From application point
of view, it is important that even if excitation source is
changed the color purity of the phosphor would not change;
the only change would be in its efficiency. From color
coordinate data, determined from emission spectra, show
that it could be a good candidate as a red phosphor for solid
state lighting, especially, chromaticity coordinates of this
phosphor approach to that of an ideal red light emitting
phosphor. It could be used for pure red LEDs or also a pure
red light emitting phosphor in combination with other blue
and green phosphor(s) for a good quality white LEDs.
Acknowledgments We are thankful to University of Delhi for
partial financial assistance through R & D grants. The author (MS) is
thankful to University Grant Commission (UGC) for Rajiv Gandhi
National fellowship (RGNF).
References
[1] Q Y Zhang, K Pita, W Ye and W X Que Chem. Phys. Lett. 351163 (2002)
[2] J K Park, M A Lim, C H Kim, H D Park, J T Park and S Y Choi
Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 683 (2003)
[3] C Wu, W Qin, G Qin, D Zhao, J Zhang, S Huang, S Lu, H Liu
and H Lin Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 520 (2003)
[4] H G Liu, Y I Lee, S Park, K Jang and S S Kim J. Lumin. 110 11
(2004)
[5] K M Shinde, I M Nagpure, S J Dhoble, S V Godbole and M K
Bhide Indian J. Phys. 83 503 (2009)
[6] V Simon, D Muresan, A F Takaes, M Neumann and S Simon
Solid State Ionics 178 221 (2007)
[7] S Vaidyanathan and D Y Jeon J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 6 453
(2009)
[8] J Hao, J Gao and M Cocivera Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 2224 (2003)
[9] S Schweizer, L W Hobbs, M Secu, J Spaeth, A Edgar and G V
M Williams Appl. Phys. Lett. 83 449 (2003)
[10] T Tsuboi Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. 26 95 (2004)
[11] A D Deshmukh, S J Dhoble, S V Godbole, M K Bhide, D R
Peshwe Indian J. Phys. 83 423 (2009)
[12] P P Pal, P K Baitha, N Borgohain and J Manam Indian J. Phys.
88 243 (2014)
[13] H Lai, A Bao, Y Yang, Y Tao and H Yang J. Nanoparticle Res.
10 1355 (2008)
[14] S R Liviano, A I Becerro, D Alcantara, V Grazu, J M de la
Fuente and M Ocana Inorg. Chem. 52 647 (2013)
[15] Y Ruan, Q Xiao, W Luo, R Li and X Chen Nanotechnology 22275701 (2011)
[16] B Yan and X Xiao Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5 1962 (2010)
[17] Z Shan, D Chen, Y Yu, P Huang, H Lin and Y Wang J. Mater.
Sci. 45 2775 (2010)
[18] A V Egorysheva et al. Inorg. Mater. 49 1061 (2013)
[19] J Yang et al. J. Alloys Compd. 454 506 (2008)
[20] P S R Naik, M K Kumar, Y N Ch R Babu and A S Kumar Indian
J. Phys. 87 757 (2013)
[21] B H Rudramadevi, K Thilagavathi and S Buddhudu Indian J.
Phys. 86 997 (2014)
[22] H S Jang, H Yang, S W Kim, J Y Han, S -G Lee and D Y Jeon
Adv. Mater. 20 2696 (2008)
[23] H S Jang and D Y Jeon Appl. Phys. Lett. 90 041906 (2007)
[24] G Blasse and B C Grabmaier Luminescent Materials (Berlin:
Springer) (1994)
[25] S S Babu, P Babu, C K Jayasankar, W Sievers, Th Troster and G
Wortmann J. Lum. 126 109 (2007)
[26] K N Shinde, S J Dhoble and A Kumar J. Lum. 131 1939 (2011)
[27] B D P Raju and C M Reddy Opt. Mater. 34 1251 (2012)
[28] K Linganna and C K Jayasankar Spectrochim. Acta A Mol.
Biomol. Spectrosc. 97 788 (2012)
[29] G Gao, N Da, S Reibstein and L Wondraczek Opt. Express 18A575 (2010)
[30] Q Ju, Y Liu, R Li, L Liu, W Luo and X Chen J. Phys. Chem. C
113 2309 (2009)
[31] V R Bandi, B K Grandhe, K Jang, H Lee, S Yi and J Jeong
Ceram. Internat. 37 2001 (2011)
Novel luminescent red phosphor 629
[32] L Liu et al. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93 4081 (2010)
[33] G Y Chao and T S Ercit Can. Mineral. 29 565 (1991)
[34] R C Millard, R C Peterson and B K Hunter Am. Mineral. 80 885
(1995)
[35] V Ramaswamy, L B McCusker and C H Baerlocher Micro.
Mesop. Mater. 31 1 (1999)
[36] S-S Chang and M S Jo Ceram. Internat. 33 511 (2007)
[37] H C Eun, Y Z Cho, H S Park, I T Kim, H S Lee and G I Park
Chem. Eng. Sci. 75 359 (2012)
[38] F Lei and B Yan J. Solid State Chem. 181 855 (2008)
[39] B K Grandhe et al. Ceram. Internat. 38 6273 (2012)
[40] B Yue et al. Cur. Appl. Phys. 10 1216 (2010)
[41] K Vivekanandan, S Selvasekarapandian, P Kolandaivel, M T
Sebastian and S Suma Mater. Chem. Phys. 49 204 (1997)
[42] L Liu and X Chen Nanotechnology 18 255704 (2007)
[43] R T Karunakaran, K Marimuthu, S S Babu and S Arumugam
Solid State Sci. 11 1882 (2009)
[44] M Yu, J Lin, J Fu, H J Zhang and Y C Han J. Mater. Chem. 131413 (2003)
[45] D Hreniak, W Strek, P Deren, A Bednarkiewicz and A
Łukowiak J. Alloys Comp. 828 408 (2006)
[46] A H Kitai Solid State Luminescence (London: Chapman & Hall)
p 38 (1993)
[47] S Shionoya and W M Yen, Phosphor Handbook (Boca Raton:
CRC Press) p 190 (1999)
[48] W Chen, R Sammynaiken and Y Huang J. Appl. Phys. 88 1424 (2000)
[49] Color Calculator version 2, A software from Radiant Imaging, Inc.
http://radiant-imaging-color-calculator.software.informer.com
(2007)
[50] L H C Andrade et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 027402 (2008)
[51] Z Lou and J Hao Thin Solid Films 450 335 (2004)
[52] M Ferhi, K Horchani-Naifer and M Ferid J. Rare Earths 27 182
(2009)
[53] J Hao, S A Studenikin and M Cocivera J. Lum. 93 313 (2001)
630 P D Sahare and M Singh