Meller Systemic resistance to gray mold induced in tomato by benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma...

30
Meller Harel, 1, Phytopathology Systemic resistance to gray mold induced in tomato by 1 benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum T39 2 3 Yael Meller Harel*, Zeraye Haile Mehari, Dalia Rav-David and Yigal Elad 4 5 Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, Agricultural Research 6 Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250 7 8 *Corresponding author: Y. Meller Harel; E-mail address: [email protected]; 9 current postal address: Department of Vegetable Research, Institute of Plant Sciences, 10 The Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel 11 12 13 ABSTRACT 14 Meller Harel, Y., Haile Mehari, Z., Rav-David, D., and Elad, Y. Systemic resistance 15 to gray mold induced in tomato by benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum 16 T39. Phytopathology 17 Gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) is an important disease of tomato (Solanum 18 lycopersicum). This study examined defense-related gene expression involved in the 19 resistance to B. cinerea that is induced in tomato plants by benzothiadiazole and 20 Trichoderma harzianum T39 soil drench. In whole plants, transcriptional changes 21 related to salicylic acid and ethylene were induced by the application of a 0.01% 22 benzothiadiazole solution; whereas changes related to jasmonic acid were induced by 23 the application of a 0.4% T39 suspension. On detached leaves, soil treatment by T39 24 led to enhanced resistance to B. cinerea infection that was proportional to the 25 Page 1 of 30 Phytopathology "First Look" paper • http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-02-13-0043-R • posted 09/18/2013 This paper has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but has not yet been copyedited or proofread. The final published version may differ.

Transcript of Meller Systemic resistance to gray mold induced in tomato by benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma...

Meller Harel, 1, Phytopathology

Systemic resistance to gray mold induced in tomato by 1

benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum T39 2

3

Yael Meller Harel*, Zeraye Haile Mehari, Dalia Rav-David and Yigal Elad 4

5

Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research,

Agricultural Research 6

Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250 7

8

*Corresponding author: Y. Meller Harel; E-mail address: [email protected]; 9

current postal address: Department of Vegetable Research, Institute of Plant Sciences, 10

The Volcani Center Agricultural Research Organization, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel 11

12

13

ABSTRACT 14

Meller Harel, Y., Haile Mehari, Z., Rav-David, D., and Elad, Y. Systemic resistance 15

to gray mold induced in tomato by benzothiadiazole and Trichoderma harzianum 16

T39. Phytopathology 17

Gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) is an important disease of tomato (Solanum 18

lycopersicum). This study examined defense-related gene expression involved in the 19

resistance to B. cinerea that is induced in tomato plants by benzothiadiazole and 20

Trichoderma harzianum T39 soil drench. In whole plants, transcriptional changes 21

related to salicylic acid and ethylene were induced by the application of a 0.01% 22

benzothiadiazole solution; whereas changes related to jasmonic acid were induced by 23

the application of a 0.4% T39 suspension. On detached leaves, soil treatment by T39 24

led to enhanced resistance to B. cinerea infection that was proportional to the 25

Page 1 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 2, Phytopathology

concentration of the T39 suspension. By 5 days after pathogen inoculation, the plants 26

that had received the 0.04% T39 drench exhibited 62% less severe disease than the 27

untreated plants. The 0.4% T39 drench led to an 84% reduction in disease severity. 28

Observations of B. cinerea infection in leaves harvested from plants grown in the 29

treated soils revealed that drenching with a T39 suspension induces systemic 30

resistance against B. cinerea and primes salicylic acid- and ethylene-related gene 31

expression in a manner proportional to the concentration of the biocontrol agent. 32

Benzothiadiazole treatment induced resistance to gray mold independently of salicylic 33

acid and led to strong priming of two genes known to be involved in defense against 34

B. cinerea, Pti5 and PI2. 35

36

Additional keywords: Tomato, gray mold, induced resistance, control agents, jasmonic 37

acid 38

39

Upon exposure to biotic or abiotic stimuli, plants’ innate defenses against 40

pathogens or pests can be strengthened in a systemic manner, leading to the 41

physiological state of induced resistance (IR). IR is usually reached through two main 42

physiological routes: systemic acquired resistance (SAR) or induced systemic 43

resistance (ISR), which, in model plant systems, can be differentiated by the nature of 44

the elicitor and the regulatory pathways involved. SAR, occurs usually following an 45

earlier localized attack by a pathogen that is characterized by the accumulation of the 46

phytohormone salicylic acid (SA), the activation of pathogenesis-related (PR) gene 47

expression and, often, the development of a necrotic region at the site of the pathogen 48

entry, which is known as the hypersensitive response (13). ISR begins with the 49

colonization of plant roots by beneficial soilborne microorganisms, such as plant 50

Page 2 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 3, Phytopathology

growth-promoting rhizobacteria and fungi (55). It involves the phytohormones 51

ethylene (ET) and jasmonic acid (JA) and is generally associated with a physiological 52

state in which plants can react more efficiently to pathogen attack, that is, the priming 53

of plant defense mechanisms (11). Primed defense reactions include an earlier 54

oxidative burst and stronger up-regulation of defense-related genes (3). Although 55

more often associated with the ISR pathway, priming can also be induced by SAR 56

activators, such as SA and its chemical analogues, as well as various other molecules 57

(26). 58

SA activates the SAR response via a complex signaling cascade that leads to the 59

induction of the expression of PR genes (36). SA-analogues such as benzothiadiazole 60

(BTH) and its derivative acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) are assumed to activate SAR 61

through a similar pathway (32, 48). The efficacy of BTH and ASM as control agents 62

has been demonstrated in various pathosystems such as squash (Curbita pepo)-63

Phytophthora blight (25), pea (Pisum spp.)-Uromyces pisi (8), grapevine (Vitis 64

vinera)-Plasmopara viticola (44) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.)-Puccinia psidii 65

(9). In tomato, spray applications of SA analogues have been found to effectively 66

control gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) (2, 39). These compounds have also been shown 67

to be effective when seeds were sown in treated soil (2, 7), when used as a stand-alone 68

seed treatment or when integrated with applications of the plant growth-promoting 69

rhizobacterium P. fluorescence (1). Studies of the defense pathway activated by the 70

SA-analogues for IR against B. cinerea are scarce. In one study, early and enhanced 71

generation of reactive oxygen species, as well as an increase in peroxidase activity 72

were found to be important in induced resistance to B. cinerea in tomato (39). 73

Trichoderma spp. are established plant growth-promoting fungi that suppress 74

plant diseases by direct antibiosis or mycoparasitism, as well as indirect induced 75

Page 3 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 4, Phytopathology

resistance (37, 52). Trichoderma harzianum is the most commonly studied and most 76

effective biocontrol agent available for use against a wide variety of plant diseases 77

(17, 40). The T. harzanium T39 isolate, initially characterized as a control agent of 78

gray mold on grapevine (15), has been shown to effectively control other foliar 79

pathogens when sprayed onto various crops (10, 47), applied as a soil drench (12, 16), 80

applied directly to tubers (19), or even dispersed by honeybees (50). 81

Plant-Trichoderma spp. interaction is known to correlate with systemic 82

modulations of the plant proteome and transcriptome (23, 52). For instance, the 83

interaction between T39 and grapevine was recently shown to be related to complex 84

transcriptional reprogramming (41), affecting mainly proteins associated with stress 85

responses, photosynthesis, redox signaling and energy metabolism (46). The 86

hormonal and molecular pathways involved in Trichoderma spp.-mediated IR are 87

usually activated by typical ISR in a JA/ET-dependent manner (31, 44, 51, 52). 88

However, in some instances, the colonization of plant roots by Trichoderma spp. 89

induces the expression of defense-related genes associated with the SA and JA/ET 90

pathways, allowing for complex cross-talk between the plant and the biocontrol 91

organism (23). In addition, the effects of Trichoderma spp.-based treatments on the 92

expression levels of defense-related genes vary with the type of treatment, the type of 93

tissue analyzed and the plant age. For instance, SA-induced gene expression was 94

observed in tomato foliage after long-term Trichoderma spp. treatment, soil 95

incorporated or applied as a seed coating (4, 54), but opposite results were observed 96

when T39 was sprayed onto grapevine foliage (45, 46). Similarly, a SAR-like 97

response was observed when a high rate of T. asperellum T-34 was applied, but not 98

when a lower application rate (still sufficient for IR) was used (49). In the B. cinerea-99

tomato system, the efficacies of two species of Trichoderma, including T. harzanium 100

Page 4 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 5, Phytopathology

T22, and the transcriptional changes they induced in the plants were shown to vary 101

greatly with the tomato cultivar and Trichoderma strain (54). In the latter system, 102

Trichoderma spp. seed treatment led to general up-regulation of SA-marker genes 103

before infection and to the down-regulation of those genes following infection, as well 104

as the up-regulation of JA-dependent genes (54). 105

The general objective of the present work was to further characterize the IR 106

pathway triggered by benzothiadiazole and T39 in the B. cinerea-tomato system when 107

those treatments are applied as soil drenches in a commonly grown cultivar. We 108

hypothesized that there is a difference between plants’ responses to benzothiadiazole 109

and T39 with regards to the genes involved in the IR pathways. In particular, we 110

studied the role played by SA in the two cases and tested whether there is a 111

correlation between the intensity of modulation of defense-related gene expression 112

and the IR level following treatment with T39. 113

114

MATERIAL AND METHODS 115

Tomato plants and growth conditions. Tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) 116

of the commonly used determinate cultivar cv. 5811-Ram (Hazera Genetics, Brurim 117

M.P. Shikmim, Israel) were obtained from a commercial nursery (Hishtil, Ashkelon, 118

Israel) at 40 to 50 days after seeding and transplanted into 0.5-liter pots containing a 119

coconut fiber-tuff potting medium. Plants were fertigated proportionally with 120

drippers two to three times a day with 5:3:8 NPK fertilizer (irrigation water was 121

mixed to have total N, P and K concentrations of 120, 30 and 150 mg/liter, 122

respectively; EC 2.2 dS/m), allowing for 25 to 50% drainage. Plants were treated 123

against arthropod pests once initial infestation occurred and kept at 20 to 30°C in a 124

pest- and disease-free greenhouse for 1 to 2 months before treatment with inducers. 125

Page 5 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 6, Phytopathology

Treatment with inducers. The inducer treatments were applied to the plants as 126

soil drenches 4 days before inoculation and again 2 to 4 h before the plants were 127

inoculated with the pathogen. Drench treatments were carried out by applying 5 ml of 128

liquid to the wet potting medium in the root zone of the plants and preventing excess 129

liquid from draining from the bottom of the pots. Treatments included the application 130

of suspensions of Trichodex (Trichoderma harzianum T39) at concentrations of 0.04 131

and 0.4%. The activity of unformulated T. harzianum T39 conidia at these 132

concentrations is similar to the activity of the formulated product in terms of induced 133

resistance (18). An aqueous solution of BTH (Bion 50 WG, Syngenta Crop 134

Protection, Switzerland) was used at a concentration of 0.01% (1, 32). Water was 135

applied as a control. 136

Botrytis cinerea infection. B. cinerea (isolate BcI16) was cultured on potato 137

dextrose agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) in Petri dishes and incubated at 20°C 138

for 10 days. Conidia were harvested in distilled water and filtered through 139

cheesecloth and the concentration of the conidia was determined using a 140

haemocytometer under a light microscope. The concentration of the conidia was 141

adjusted to 106 conidia/ml in a solution of 0.5% glucose and 0.25% K2HPO4 and that 142

suspention was then incubated at room temperature for 2 h without shaking. Glucose 143

and K2HPO4 have been shown to facilitate the germination of B. cinerea conidia and 144

subsequent leaf infection (15). Five to seven leaflets from the fourth leaf of tomato 145

plants per treatment were excised and immediately put through a plastic net placed on 146

wet, absorbent paper in a plastic box. Each tomato leaflet was inoculated with 4 to 5 147

droplets of 10-µL inoculum. Disease severity was recorded at 3, 4, 5 and 6 days post-148

inoculation (dpi) by measuring the diameter of any necrotic lesions. 149

Page 6 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 7, Phytopathology

Experimental design and statistical analysis. The experiments were laid out 150

according to a completely random design in which seven plants received each 151

treatment. Three independent experiments were carried out. For the disease 152

development study, average lesion area was calculated for each leaflet, plant and 153

replicate and the statistical analysis included all data from all experiments. Disease 154

incidence and AUDPC data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance 155

(ANOVA) to detect significance and Fisher's protected LSD test for mean separation 156

(P ≤ 0.05). Standard errors of the means were also calculated. The standard errors 157

are marked with error bars in the figures and stated in Table 1. The statistical analysis 158

was conducted using the R version 2.10.1 software (http://www.r-project.org). 159

Disease reduction was calculated according to the formula: 160

% Disease reduction = 100 – (Lesion areaTT

*100/Lesion areaControl

) 161

where TT refers to a treatment in which T39 or BTH was added to the potting mix and 162

Control refers to the treatment in which only water was applied. 163

For the gene expression study, whole third leaves (three to four per treatment) 164

were collected at 0 dpi to study the effect of the treatment on the whole plant. To 165

study the disease effect on detached leaves, leaflets from fourth leaves were mock-166

inoculated or inoculated (five to seven per treatment) and harvested at 1 dpi. The 167

harvested leaf tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80ºC. 168

RNA isolation and qPCR analysis. Leaves collected and stored as described 169

above were ground in liquid nitrogen and total RNA was extracted using the 170

ISOLATE Kit (Bioline, London, UK). The plant effect on gene expression was tested 171

and found to be negligible: the average of the relative expressions of the genes of 172

interest in individual plants showed low variability and ranged between 83 to 104% of 173

the relative expressions in the pooled plants. Therefore, we pooled the leaf tissue 174

Page 7 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 8, Phytopathology

collected from the three independent biological replicates within each experiment, to 175

reduce noise linked to variation between individual plants. 176

Reverse transcription was performed in two to three 800-ng replicates of DNAse 177

I-treated total RNA (Applied Biosystems/Ambion, Austin, TX) using the M-MLV 178

reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI) and cDNA products were pooled to 179

reduce noise linked to the efficiency of the reverse transcription. qPCR reactions 180

were carried out in a Rotor-Gene Q 6000 (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the reaction 181

products were analyzed using Rotor-Gene 6000 software. Each PCR amplification 182

was performed in duplicate in a 15-µl reaction mixture consisting of 7.5 µl of 183

Absolute Blue SYBR Green ROX qPCR Master Mix 2X (Abgene, Epsom, UK), 1 µl 184

each of the forward and reverse primers (3 µM), 4 µl of cDNA template and 1.5 µl of 185

PCR-grade water. The cycling conditions were as follows: a 15-min pre-incubation at 186

95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 15 s at 60°C and 20 s at 72°C. The 187

amplification of one product only was confirmed by melt-curve analysis (72 to 95°C). 188

The housekeeping genes coding for ribosomal protein RPL8 (accession number 189

U60482) and Actin Tom 52 (accession number X64562) were used for the 190

normalization of gene expression. Primer 3 software 191

(http://fokker.wi.mit.edu/primer3/) was used to design gene-specific primer pairs for 192

12 defense-related genes, PR1a, Chi9, GluB, SAMT, ACO1, ERF1, Pti4, Pti5, 193

TomloxA, TomloxC, TomloxD and PI2. Among the studied genes, PR1a, Chi9 and 194

GluB code for PR proteins (55). SAMT codes for salicylic acid carboxyl 195

methyltransferase, which catalyzes the methylation of SA to methyl salicylate (meSA) 196

(5). The proteins encoded by ACO1, ERF1, Pti4 and Pti5 are related to ethylene 197

synthesis and response (22, 24, 53). The lipoxygenase-encoding genes TomloxA, 198

TomloxC and TomloxD catalyze the first step in the octadecanoid pathway involved in 199

Page 8 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 9, Phytopathology

responses to biotic and abiotic stress (28). Finally, PI2 encodes a proteinase inhibitor 200

that is up-regulated by wounding and jasmonic acid (JA) (20). 201

The self-annealing of the designed primers and specificity to the chosen target 202

were checked using the primer-blast program 203

(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi?LINK_LOC=BlastHome) 204

and the primers were synthesized (Integrated DNA Technologies, Skokie, IL). The 205

sequences of these primers are outlined in Table 1. Relative levels of gene expression 206

in the treated plants as compared to the untreated and mock-infected (calibrator) 207

plants were calculated using the formula 2- ∆∆

Ct

and the ∆∆ Ct method (35), in which 208

∆Ct = Ct specific gene - Ct normalizer and ∆∆ Ct = ∆Ct – arbitrary constant [the 209

highest calibrator ∆ Ct (51)]. In the analysis of relative gene expression, up-210

regulation was considered significant when the change in expression level was 1.5-211

fold or more and down-regulation was considered significant when the level of 212

expression was ≤0.5-fold. 213

214

RESULTS 215

Effects of BTH and T39 drench treatments on systemic resistance to gray 216

mold. BTH and T39 significantly suppressed disease severity on detached leaves 217

when applied twice to the growth medium; applications were made 4 days and 2 to 4 218

h before B. cinerea inoculation (Fig. 1). The most effective treatment was a 0.4% T39 219

suspension, which suppressed disease severity by 84% at 5 days after pathogen 220

inoculation. Applications of a 0.04% T39 suspension and a 0.01% BTH solution each 221

reduced disease severity by 62% at 5 days after inoculation (Fig. 1). 222

Effects of BTH and T39 drench treatments on the expression of defense-223

related genes in leaves of non inoculated tomato plants. Genes related to SA and 224

Page 9 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 10, Phytopathology

ET were up-regulated in whole plants grown on potting medium drenched with a 225

0.01% BTH solution (Fig. 2). The most responsive genes were PR1a, the canonical 226

marker of the SA pathway, whose expression was up-regulated 7-fold, and GluB, a 227

PR gene induced by SA and ET whose expression was up-regulated 5-fold. The 228

expression of the other PR genes, as well as Pti4 and Pti5, which code for trans-acting 229

factors of PR genes, the SAMT gene, which codes for SA methylase and the ET-230

responsive genes TomloxC, ERF1, and ACO1 were also up-regulated three- to 4-fold. 231

Expression of the proteinase inhibitor gene PI2 was also increased two-fold by the 232

soil-applied BTH treatment. These results show that, as expected, drenching with 233

BTH induced the expression of SA- and ET-responsive genes in whole plants. 234

The expression of the PR genes PR1a and GluB was down-regulated in whole 235

plants that received the T39 suspension soil drench independently of the 236

concentration. None of the other examined genes were affected by this treatment at 237

0.04% concentration. Drenching with a more concentrated T39 suspension (0.4%) 238

induced the expression of the JA marker genes TomloxA, TomloxD, and PI2, as well 239

as TomloxC and SAMT (Fig. 2). 240

Effects of B. cinerea infection and drenching treatments on the expression of 241

defense-related genes, as observed in inoculated detached leaves. Real-time PCR 242

data analysis of gene expression in detached leaves one day after infection revealed 243

that three genes that code for PR proteins, PR1a, Chi9 and GluB, were transcribed at 244

higher levels in the infected leaves than in the mock-infected (control) ones, with 245

expression up-regulated three-, two- and four-fold, respectively (Fig. 3). Similar to 246

the expression of PR genes, the expression of Pti5, which codes for ET-responsive 247

trans-acting factors involved in PR gene expression, was induced upon B. cinerea 248

infection and not by the drenching treatments alone (Fig. 4). In contrast to Pti5, the 249

Page 10 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 11, Phytopathology

expression levels of the ethylene responsive factors Pti4 and ERF1 were not affected 250

by infection alone (Fig. 4). Among the genes encoding lipoxygenases, TomloxD was 251

the most strongly up-regulated by B. cinerea infection. In contrast, the expression of 252

TomloxA was strongly inhibited (Fig. 5). The most sensitive gene to B. cinerea 253

infection was PI2, which was up-regulated 33-fold upon infection (Fig. 5). Analysis 254

of the effect of the drenching treatments alone on the defense-related genes expression 255

in detached leaves revealed that, in the absence of infection, each of those treatments 256

had either a null or inhibitory effect (Figs. 3-5). The only exception was the SAMT 257

gene, whose level of expression was up-regulated 6-fold by both the 0.04% BTH 258

treatment and the 0.04% T39 treatment and up-regulated 3-fold by the 0.4% T39 259

treatment. 260

Effect of drenching treatments on the expression of defense-related genes 261

upon gray mold infection. The drench treatments increased the induction of the 262

expression of PR genes by B. cinerea infection. Plants treated with 0.4% T39 263

suspension showed the strongest effect: upon B. cinerea infection PR1a, CHI9, and 264

GluB were upregulated by, 30- (from 0.1- to 3-fold increase), 7- (from 0.3- to 2-fold 265

increase) and 28-fold (from 0.1 to 2.8-fold increase), respectively, compared to an 266

average of 3-fold increased expression in untreated plants (Fig. 3). The 0.04% T39 267

treatment had a weaker effect: upon B. cinerea infection PR1a, Chi9, and GluB were 268

upregulated by, 8- (from 0.4- to 3-fold increase), 5.5- (from 0.6- to 3-fold increase) 269

and 5.5-fold (from 0.4 to 2-fold increase), respectively. The BTH treatment had the 270

weakest effect, affecting the up-regulation of PR1a, Chi9, by 2.7-fold and GluB by 271

6.6-fold. 272

The induction of the expression of Pti5 upon infection was also sensitive to the 273

soil treatment; the expression levels of this gene were slightly higher in infected 274

Page 11 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 12, Phytopathology

leaves detached from the 0.04 and 0.4% T39-treated plants (17- and 18-fold, 275

respectively) than in the infected plants that had not been treated with an inducer (13-276

fold difference) and were strongly increased by the BTH treatment, which led to a 24-277

fold increase. Although the expression of the other ET-responsive factors, Pti4 and 278

ERF1, were inhibited by the drenching treatments and remained very low in all cases 279

(Fig. 4), they were induced by the combination of drenching and infection: 3-fold in 280

the case of the BTH treatment, 8-fold and 3-fold in the case of the 0.04% T39 drench 281

and 5-fold and 6-fold in the case of the 0.04% T39 and 0.4% T39 treatments, 282

respectively. Expression of the ACO1 gene, which is responsible for ethylene 283

synthesis, was up-regulated 2-fold upon infection in leaves of untreated plants and 284

BTH-treated plants. In contrast, the combination of T39 drenching and gray mold 285

infection led to a 3-fold increase in expression in the case of the 0.04% T39 treatment 286

and a 5-fold increase in expression in the case of the 0.4% T39 treatment (Fig. 4). 287

Neither of the T39 treatments had any effect on the up-regulation of PI2, the most 288

infection-responsive gene in our study. In contrast, treatment with BTH led to an 86-289

fold increase in the expression of this gene upon infection (Fig. 5). The expression of 290

TomloxC and TomloxD was induced by B. cinerea infection to the same extent (2-fold 291

to 3-fold) in the control and T39-treated leaves; whereas the levels of expression of 292

these genes upon infection decreased in the BTH-treated leaves (Fig. 5). Finally, the 293

expression of TomloxA was strongly repressed by B. cinerea infection in the control, 294

BTH and 0.04% T39 plants. However, this repression of expression due to infection 295

was blocked in the leaves treated with 0.4% T39. 296

297

DISCUSSION 298

Page 12 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 13, Phytopathology

Expression levels of defense-related genes in plants often reflect the state of the 299

plant’s awareness of biotic and abiotic stresses. In the present work, we studied the 300

mode of action by which drench applications of the chemical BTH and drench 301

applications of the biocontrol agent T. harzianum T39 induce resistance to B. cinerea 302

infection in tomato leaves. In whole plants, we found that the expression of 12 303

defense-related genes was modulated as expected according to the nature of the 304

treatment: the SA-analogue BTH up-regulated SA-inducible genes; whereas T39 up-305

regulated JA-inducible genes. In infected leaves, BTH-mediated IR correlated with 306

the priming of the expression of ET- and JA-responsive genes; whereas T39-mediated 307

IR was accompanied by the priming of the expression of SA-responsive genes. 308

In whole tomato plants grown in BTH-drenched growth medium, the systemic 309

induction of SA-regulated gene expression by the SA analogue was observed together 310

with the induction of ET-regulated gene expression and the inhibition of JA-regulated 311

gene expression. Treatment with SA chemical analogues such as BTH has been 312

correlated with SAR in parsley cell cultures and, in Arabidopsis thaliana, BTH was 313

shown to prime the accumulation of PAL mRNA upon treatment with an elicitor or 314

pathogen infection (27, 30). In the case of drench applications of T39, expression of 315

SA-responsive genes was inhibited in whole plants and the JA- and ET-responsive 316

genes TomloxA and TomloxC, as well as the SAMT-encoding gene were up-regulated 317

following the application of a suspension containing a high concentration of conidia 318

(0.4%). 319

Similar up-regulation of TomloxA and, to a lesser extent, TomloxC was observed 320

in tomato plants of different cultivars grown from seeds coated with T. harzianum 321

T22 (54). In that work, gene expression was only weakly induced by the treatment in 322

a breeding line that was not responsive to the biocontrol agent. We observed a similar 323

Page 13 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 14, Phytopathology

correlation between the strength of IR and the degree to which the level of gene 324

expression was affected by the treatment. 325

In addition, the up-regulation of SAMT in plants treated with a highly 326

concentrated T39 suspension most probably reflects the induction of methylation of 327

SA, to yield meSA. In tobacco, methyl SA (meSA) produced from SA by SAMT was 328

found to act as a mobile signal critical for the development of SAR. Once transported 329

systemically to distant tissue by the vascular system, meSA is re-converted into active 330

SA, triggering the expression of defense genes in these tissues (42). Since 331

demethylation of meSA to SA is generally considered to be a prerequisite for SAR 332

(42, 43), this suggests an inhibition of SAR by T39 treatment, in line with the 333

inhibition of SA-responsive gene expression. Therefore, in the present study, drench 334

applications of a 0.4% T39 suspension led to the induction of JA- and ET-responsive 335

genes in whole plants, in accordance with the general consensus that this biocontrol 336

agent works through the ISR pathway. 337

In leaves detached from plants that had received the drenching treatments, SAMT 338

was the only gene to be up-regulated. BTH drenching, in particular, had the strongest 339

effect on the level of SAMT transcription, which remained high upon B. cinerea 340

inoculation. In addition, the up regulation of the SA-regulated genes due to 341

inoculation was not affected by the treatment. These results suggest that BTH 342

drenching treatment leads to transport of SA in the form of meSA in the detached 343

leaves without inducing SAR there. A similar absence of any correlation between IR 344

associated with BTH and SA-induced gene expression was described in a previous 345

study that used the same inoculation assay (7). In that work, PR1a expression was 346

found to be induced by an extreme concentration of BTH, but not by the concentration 347

active in IR. Accordingly, the relationship between the IR associated with SA 348

Page 14 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 15, Phytopathology

analogues and SA-dependent SAR is still controversial (21, 34). In the present study, 349

up regulation of the five genes, all related to the ET and JA pathways (GluB, ERF1, 350

Pti4, Pti5 and PI2) was observed upon infection in the leaves detached from plants 351

grown on BTH drenched soil as compared to the leaves of untreated plants. This so-352

called priming effect was strongest for Pti5 and PI2. These two genes are known to 353

play a major role in defending the plant against B. cinerea infection (6, 14). 354

In the case of drenching with T39 suspensions, strong priming effects on PR1a, 355

Chi9, and GluB expression were observed. The level of priming was proportional to 356

the concentration of the T39 suspension applied and correlated with the level of IR. 357

Up-regulation of SAMT was observed as well upon T39 drench treatment, but when 358

plants treated with T39 were inoculated, their levels of SAMT mRNA fell back to the 359

level observed in untreated plants. Since up regulation of the PR genes was observed 360

in that case, it suggests an increase in SA level. SAMT appears therefore as a good 361

marker for SA involvement in the IR molecular pathways. The priming effect of the 362

T39 treatment on defense- and microbial recognition-related gene expression upon 363

infection with B. cinerea is expected for a biocontrol agent triggering the ISR 364

pathway (3) and has been reported by others (38, 41, 51). However, the recent study 365

of the effect of T22 treatment on gene expression in IR against B. cinerea showed 366

opposite results, mainly up-regulation of SA-marker genes before infection and the 367

down-regulation of those genes following infection (54). The discrepancy with our 368

results can probably be explained by the mode of application of the biocontrol agent 369

as well as the type of the bioassay for gray mold infection. Expression of the ET-370

related genes EFR1 and ACO1 was also primed by the T39 treatments. In addition, 371

the induced resistance to gray mold observed in plants treated with a 0.4% T39 372

suspension correlated with a maintained level of TomloxA expression. This is in 373

Page 15 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 16, Phytopathology

accordance with the suggested role of TomloxA in controlling the spread of beneficial 374

fungi in roots (33). Similarly, in the case of P. viticola-grapevine interaction, 375

induction of Lox9 genes transcription was observed in T39-treated plants (45). Toxic 376

effects of compounds derived from the lipoxygenase pathway, such as C6-volatiles, 377

on B. cinerea have also been described (29). 378

In conclusion, SA was involved in opposite manner in the BTH- and T39-379

mediated IR in the tomato-B. cinerea system. Prior to inoculation, the SA-responsive 380

genes were systemically up regulated by BTH and inhibited by T39. Following 381

inoculation in the detached leaves BTH-mediated IR was found independent to SA, 382

probably involving SA transport in the form of meSA, while T39 induced strong 383

priming of the SA-responsive genes expression. In addition, the present study shows 384

a clear correlation between the concentration of the applied T39 suspension, the rate 385

of induced resistance in tomato leaves and the priming of the expression of genes 386

related to SA and ET. Practically, since the two control agents both induce resistance, 387

but do so in different ways, they should be applied in a way that allows for constant 388

exposure and protection of the host plant, including during periods preceding 389

infection by B. cinerea. This will allow the activation of the different resistance genes 390

prior to and during the infection process. 391

392

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 393

This research was funded by the Autonomous Province of Trento, Call for Proposal 394

Major Projects 2006, Project ENVIROCHANGE. The authors acknowledge the help 395

of Mr. Ran Shulhani and Mr. Menahem Borenshtein, who took care of the plants. 396

Publication of the ARO number 513/13. 397

398

Page 16 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 17, Phytopathology

LITERATURE CITED 399

1. Abo-Elyousr, K. A. M., and El-Hendawy, H. H. 2008. Integration of 400

Pseudomonas fluorescens and acibenzolar-S-methyl to control bacterial spot 401

disease of tomato. Crop Prot. 27:1118-1124. 402

2. Achuo, E. A., Audenaert, K., Meziane, H., and Höfte, M. 2004. The salicylic 403

acid-dependent defence pathway is effective against different pathogens in 404

tomato and tobacco. Plant Pathol. 53:65-72. 405

3. Ahn, I. P., Lee, S. W., and Suh, S. C. 2007. Rhizobacteria-induced priming in 406

Arabidopsis is dependent on ethylene, jasmonic acid, and NPR1. Mol. Plant-407

Microbe Interact. 20:759-768. 408

4. Alfano, G., Ivey, M. L. L., Cakir, C., Bos, J. I. B., Miller, S. A., Madden, L. V., 409

Kamoun, S., and Hoitink, H. A. J. 2007. Systemic modulation of gene expression 410

in tomato by Trichoderma hamatum 382. Phytopathology 97:429-437. 411

5. Ament, K., Krasikov, V., Allmann, S., Rep, M., Takken, F. L., and Schuurink, R. 412

C. 2010. Methyl salicylate production in tomato affects biotic interactions. Plant 413

J. 62:124-134. 414

6. Asselbergh, B., Curvers, K., Franca, S. C., Audenaert, K., Vuylsteke, M., Van 415

Breusegem, F., and Höfte, M. 2007. Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in sitiens, an 416

abscisic acid-deficient tomato mutant, involves timely production of hydrogen 417

peroxide and cell wall modifications in the epidermis. Plant Physiol. 144:1863-418

1877. 419

7. Audenaert, K., De Meyer, G. B., and Höfte, M. 2002. Abscisic acid determines 420

basal susceptibility of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and suppresses salicylic acid-421

dependent signaling mechanisms. Plant Physiol. 128:491-501. 422

8. Barilli, E., Sillero, J. C., and Rubiales, D. 2010. Induction of systemic acquired 423

resistance in pea against rust (Uromyces pisi) by exogenous application of biotic 424

and abiotic inducers. J. Phytopathol. 158:30-34. 425

9. Boava, L. P., Kuhn, O. J., Pascholati, S. F., Di Piero, R. M., and Furtado, E. L. 426

2009. Effect of acibenzolar-S-methyl and Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the 427

activation of eucalyptus defences against rust. Australas. Plant Pathol. 38:594-428

602. 429

Page 17 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 18, Phytopathology

10. Brand, M., Messika, Y., Elad, Y., David, D. R., and Sztejnberg, A. 2009. Spray 430

treatments combined with climate modification for the management of Leveillula 431

taurica in sweet pepper. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 124:309-329. 432

11. Conrath, U., Beckers, G. J. M., Flors, V., Garcia-Agustin, P., Jakab, G., Mauch, 433

F., Newman, M. A., Pieterse, C. M. J., Poinssot, B., Pozo, M. J., Pugin, A., 434

Schaffrath, U., Ton, J., Wendehenne, D., Zimmerli, L., and Mauch-Mani, B. 435

2006. Priming: Getting ready for battle. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 19:1062-436

1071. 437

12. De Meyer, G., Bigirimana, J., Elad, Y., and Höfte, M. 1998. Induced systemic 438

resistance in Trichoderma harzianum T39 biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea. Eur. J. 439

Plant Pathol. 104:279-286. 440

13. Durrant, W. E., and Dong, X. 2004. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. 441

Phytopathol. 42:185-209. 442

14. El Oirdi, M., Abd El Rahman, T., Rigano, L., El Hadrami, A., Rodriguez, M. C., 443

Daayf, F., Vojnov, A., and Bouarab, K. 2011. Botrytis cinerea manipulates the 444

antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development 445

in tomato. Plant Cell 23:2405-2421. 446

15. Elad, Y. 1994. Biological control of grape gray mold by Trichoderma harzianum. 447

Crop Prot. 13:35-38. 448

16. Elad, Y., Kirshner, B., and Sztejnberg, A. 1998. Management of powdery mildew 449

and gray mold of cucumber by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and Ampelomyces 450

quisqualis AQ10. Biocontrol 43:241-251. 451

17. Elad, Y. 2000. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma 452

harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Prot. 19:709-714. 453

18. Elad, Y. 2000. Trichoderma harzianum T39 preparation for biocontrol of plant 454

diseases - Control of Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Cladosporium 455

fulvum. Biocontrol Sci.Technol. 10:499-507. 456

19. Etebarian, H. R., Scott, E. S., and Wicks, T. J. 2000. Trichoderma harzianum T39 457

and T. virens DAR 74290 as potential biological control agents for phytophthora 458

erythroseptica. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 106:329-337. 459

20. Farmer, E. E., and Ryan, C. A. 1992. Octadecanoid precursors of jasmonic acid 460

activate the synthesis of wound-inducible proteinase-inhibitors. Plant Cell 4:129-461

134. 462

Page 18 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 19, Phytopathology

21. Gozzo, F. 2003. Systemic acquired resistance in crop protection: From nature to a 463

chemical approach. J. Agr. Food Chem. 51:4487-4503. 464

22. Gu, Y. Q., Yang, C., Thara, V. K., Zhou, J., and Martin, G. B. 2000. Pti4 is 465

induced by ethylene and salicylic acid, and its product is phosphorylated by the 466

Pto kinase. Plant Cell 12:771-785. 467

23. Hermosa, R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., and Monte, E. 2012. Plant-beneficial effects of 468

Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 158:17-25. 469

24. Huang, Z. J., Zhang, Z. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, H. B., Huang, D. F., and Huang, 470

R. F. 2004. Tomato TERF1 modulates ethylene response and enhances osmotic 471

stress tolerance by activating expression of downstream genes. Febs Lett. 472

573:110-116. 473

25. Ji, P., Yin, J., and Kone, D. 2011. Application of acibenzolar-S-methyl and 474

standard fungicides for control of Phytophthora blight on squash. Crop Prot. 475

30:1601-1605. 476

26. Jung, H. W., Tschaplinski, T. J., Wang, L., Glazebrook, J., and Greenberg, J. T. 477

2009. Priming in systemic plant immunity. Science 324:89-91. 478

27. Katz, V. A., Thulke, O. U., and Conrath, U. 1998. A benzothiadiazole primes 479

parsley cells for augmented elicitation of defense responses. Plant Physiol. 480

117:1333-1339. 481

28. Kazan, K., and Manners, J. M. 2008. Jasmonate signaling: Toward an integrated 482

view. Plant Physiol. 146:1459-1468. 483

29. Kishimoto, K., Matsui, K., Ozawa, R., and Takabayashi, J. 2008. Direct 484

fungicidal activities of C6-aldehydes are important constituents for defense 485

responses in Arabidopsis against Botrytis cinerea. Phytochemistry 69:2127-2132. 486

30. Kohler, A., Schwindling, S., and Conrath, U. 2002. Benzothiadiazole-induced 487

priming for potentiated responses to pathogen infection, wounding, and 488

infiltration of water into leaves requires the NPR1/NIM1 gene in Arabidopsis. 489

Plant Physiol. 128:1046-1056. 490

31. Korolev, N., David, D. R., and Elad, Y. 2008. The role of phytohormones in basal 491

resistance and Trichoderma-induced systemic resistance to Botrytis cinerea in 492

Arabidopsis thaliana. Biocontrol 53:667-683. 493

32. Lawton, K. A., Friedrich, L., Hunt, M., Weymann, K., Delaney, T., Kessmann, 494

H., Staub, T., and Ryals, J. 1996. Benzothiadiazole induces disease resistance in 495

Page 19 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 20, Phytopathology

Arabidopsis by activation of the systemic acquired resistance signal transduction 496

pathway. Plant J. 10:71-82. 497

33. Leon-Morcillo, R. J., Angel, J., Martin-Rodriguez, Vierheilig, H., Ocampo, J. A., 498

and Garcia-Garrido, J. M. 2012. Late activation of the 9-oxylipin pathway during 499

arbuscular mycorrhiza formation in tomato and its regulation by jasmonate 500

signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 63:3545-3558. 501

34. Liu, C. L., Ruan, Y., Lin, Z. J., Wei, R., Peng, Q., Guan, C. Y., and Ishii, H. 502

2008. Antagonism between acibenzolar-S-methyl-induced systemic acquired 503

resistance and jasmonic acid-induced systemic acquired susceptibility to 504

Colletotrichum orbiculare infection in cucumber. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 505

72:141-145. 506

35. Livak, K. J., and Schmittgen, T. D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression 507

data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. 508

Methods 25:402-408. 509

36. Loake, G., and Grant, M. 2007. Salicylic acid in plant defence-the players and 510

protagonists. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10:466-472. 511

37. Lorito, M., Woo, S. L., Harman, G. E., and Monte, E. 2010. Translational 512

research on Trichoderma: From 'omics' to the field. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 513

48:395-417. 514

38. Malmierca, M. G., Cardoza, R. E., Alexander, N. J., McCormick, S. P., Hermosa, 515

R., Monte, E., and Gutierrez, S. 2012. Involvement of Trichoderma 516

Trichothecenes in the biocontrol activity and induction of plant defense related 517

genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:4856-4868. 518

39. Malolepsza, U. 2006. Induction of disease resistance by acibenzolar-S-methyl 519

and o-hydroxyethylorutin against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Crop Prot. 520

25:956-962. 521

40. Moran-Diez, E., Rubio, B., Dominguez, S., Hermosa, R., Monte, E., and Nicolas, 522

C. 2012. Transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana after 24 h incubation 523

with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. J. Plant Physiol. 169:614-524

620. 525

41. Palmieri, M. C., Perazzolli, M., Matafora, V., Moretto, M., Bachi, A., and Pertot, 526

I. 2012. Proteomic analysis of grapevine resistance induced by Trichoderma 527

Page 20 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 21, Phytopathology

harzianum T39 reveals specific defence pathways activated against downy 528

mildew. J. Exp. Bot. 63:6237-6251. 529

42. Park, S. W., Kaimoyo, E., Kumar, D., Mosher, S., and Klessig, D. F. 2007. 530

Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. 531

Science 318:113-116. 532

43. Park, S. W., Liu, P. P., Forouhar, F., Vlot, A. C., Tong, L., Tietjen, K., and 533

Klessig, D. F. 2009. Use of a synthetic salicylic acid analog to investigate the 534

roles of methyl salicylate and its esterases in plant disease resistance. Journal 535

Biol. Chem. 284:7307-7317. 536

44. Perazzolli, M., Dagostin, S., Ferrari, A., Elad, Y., and Pertot, I. 2008. Induction 537

of systemic resistance against Plasmopara viticola in grapevine by Trichoderma 538

harzianum T39 and benzothiadiazole. Biol. Control 47:228-234. 539

45. Perazzolli, M., Roatti, B., Bozza, E., and Pertot, I. 2011. Trichoderma harzianum 540

T39 induces resistance against downy mildew by priming for defense without 541

costs for grapevine. Biol. Control 58:74-82. 542

46. Perazzolli, M., Moretto, M., Fontana, P., Ferrarini, A., Velasco, R., Moser, C., 543

Delledonne, M., and Pertot, I. 2012. Downy mildew resistance induced by 544

Trichoderma harzianum T39 in susceptible grapevines partially mimics 545

transcriptional changes of resistant genotypes. BMC Genomics 13:660. 546

doi:10.1186/1471-2164-13-660. 547

47. Pertot, I., Fiamingo, F., Amsalem, L., Maymon, M., Freeman, S., Gobbin, D., and 548

Elad, Y. 2007. Sensitivity of two Podosphaera aphanis populations to disease 549

control agents. J. Plant Pathol. 89:85-96. 550

48. Ryals, J. A., Neuenschwander, U. H., Willits, M. G., Molina, A., Steiner, H. Y., 551

and Hunt, M. D. 1996. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 8:1809-1819. 552

49. Segarra, G., Casanova, E., Bellido, D., Odena, M. A., Oliveira, E., and Trillas, I. 553

2007. Proteome, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid changes in cucumber plants 554

inoculated with Trichoderma asperellum strain T34. Proteomics 7:3943-3952. 555

50. Shafir, S., Dag, A., Bilu, A., Abu-Toamy, M., and Elad, Y. 2006. Honey bee 556

dispersal of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum T39: effectiveness in 557

suppressing Botrytis cinerea on strawberry under field conditions. Eur. J. Plant 558

Pathol. 116:119-128. 559

Page 21 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 22, Phytopathology

51. Shoresh, M., Yedidia, I., and Chet, I. 2005. Involvement of jasmonic 560

acid/ethylene signaling pathway in the systemic resistance induced in cucumber 561

by Trichoderma asperellum T203. Phytopathology 95:76-84. 562

52. Shoresh, M., Harman, G. E., and Mastouri, F. 2010. Induced systemic resistance 563

and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 48:21-564

43. 565

53. Thara, V. K., Tang, X. Y., Gu, Y. Q., Martin, G. B., and Zhou, J. M. 1999. 566

Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato induces the expression of tomato EREBP-like 567

genes Pti4 and Pti5 independent of ethylene, salicylate and jasmonate. Plant J. 568

20:475-483. 569

54. Tucci, M., Ruocco, M., De Masi, L., De Palma, M., and Lorito, M. 2011. The 570

beneficial effect of Trichoderma spp. on tomato is modulated by the plant 571

genotype. Mol. Plant Pathol. 12:341-354. 572

55. Van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., and Pieterse, C. M. J. 1998. Systemic 573

resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36:453-483. 574

575

Page 22 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 23, Phytopathology

Table 1: Gene-specific primers used in quantitative real-time polymerase chain 576

reactions 577

Gene name Accession number Forward primer Reverse primer

RPL8 X64562 TGGAGGGCGTACTGAGAAAC TCATAGCAACACCACGAACC

Actin Tom 52 U60482 CATCGTCCTCAGTGGTGGTA AGATCCTCCGATCAAGACAC

PR1a NM-001247429.1 CTGGTGCTGTGAAGATGTGG TGACCCTAGCACAACCAAGA

Chi9 NM-001247474.1 ATGTGGAAGAGCCATTGGAG TGAGGAGTCATCCAGAACCA

GluB NM-001247876.1 TCGAACAGGAGGAGGATCTG TCCAGGCTTTCTCGGACTAC

Pti5 U89256.1 GACATGGTGCGAGAGTATGG CTGAAACAGAGGCGTTCACT

Pti4 U89255.1 GCTGAAACACCGAAAGGAAG TCGTACGTTCCAAGCAAAC

TomloxA U09026.1 GGTTACCTCCCAAATCGTCC TGTTTGTAACTGCGCTGTG

TomloxC NM-001246883.1 TGTTGGACATGGTGACAAGAA TGGCCAGAAGTTACCCAAAC

TomloxD U37840.1 CCATCCTCACCACCCTCATC TACTCGGGATCGTTCTCGTC

ERF1 AY044236 ATTAGGGATTCAACGCGTAA AGAGACCAAGGACCCCTCAT

SAMT NM_001247880.1 TGGCAAGTACAAGTCCACCA TCCACCTTTCATCAATTCTTCC

PI2 K03291.1 CGACGTGTTGCACTGGTTAC TGCCAATCCAGAAGATGGAC

ACO1 NM-001247095.1 GGGCTTCTTTGAGTTGGTGA GCTTGAACAGCCTCAAGTCC

578

579

Page 23 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 24, Phytopathology

Figure captions 580

Figure 1. Effects of BTH and T39 soil drenches on the development of gray mold 581

(Botrytis cinerea) on leaves detached from treated tomato plants. Disease severity is 582

expressed as lesion area following inoculation with a conidial suspension and as the 583

area under the disease pressure curve (AUDPC ± SE) through 6 days after 584

inoculation. Bars represent the standard error of each mean. Each mean is an average 585

of seven replicates. Bars represent the standard error of the mean. Points at each 586

sampling date followed by a common letter are significantly different according to 587

Fisher's protected LSD test (P≤0.05). 588

589

Figure 2. Effects of BTH and T39 soil drenches on the expression of defense-related 590

genes in whole tomato plants. Total RNA was isolated from the third uninfected 591

leaves and subjected to qPCR analysis. Fold-change is expressed relative to 592

expression levels observed in plants grown on water-drenched soil. Mean levels of 593

relative expression from five qPCR experiments are presented. Bars represent the 594

standard error of the mean. 595

Figure 3. Effects of Botrytis cinerea infection (1 day post-inoculation) on the 596

expression of defense-related genes. Expression levels of the salicylic acid-related 597

genes PR1a, Chi9, GluB and SAMT were analyzed in plants grown in drenched soil in 598

the absence (-) or presence (+) of B. cinerea infection. Total RNA was isolated from 599

leaves and subjected to qPCR analysis. Fold-change is expressed relative to the level 600

of expression observed in uninfected plants grown in water-drenched soil. Mean 601

levels of relative expression from three qPCR experiments are presented. Bars 602

represent the standard error of the mean. 603

Page 24 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Meller Harel, 25, Phytopathology

604

Figure 4. Effects of Botrytis cinerea infection (1 day post-inoculation) on the 605

expression of ethylene-related genes. Expression levels of ERF1, Pti4, Pti5 and 606

ACO1 were analyzed in plants grown in drenched soil in the absence (-) or presence 607

(+) of B. cinerea infection. Total RNA was isolated from leaves and subjected to 608

qPCR analysis. Fold-change is expressed relative to the level of expression observed 609

in uninfected plants grown in water-drenched soil. Mean levels of relative expression 610

from three qPCR experiments are presented. Bars represent the standard error of the 611

mean. 612

613

Figure 5. Effects of Botrytis cinerea infection (1 day post-inoculation) on the 614

expression of lipoxygenase and proteinase-inhibitor genes. Expression levels of 615

TomloxA, TomloxC, TomloxD and PI2 were analyzed in plants grown in drenched soil 616

in the absence (-) or presence (+) of B. cinerea infection. Total RNA was isolated 617

from leaves and subjected to qPCR analysis. Fold-change is expressed relative to the 618

level of expression observed in uninfected plants grown on water-drenched soil. 619

Mean levels of relative expression from three qPCR experiments are presented. Bars 620

represent the standard error of the mean. 621

Page 25 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Figure 1

AUDPC Treatment

Water

BTH 0.01%

T39 0.04%

T39 0.4%

127.0±4.5 a 49.5± 4.6 b 46.5± 4.2 b

24.7± 1.2 c a

b b

c 0

20

40

60

0 2 4 6

Dis

ea

se

s

eve

rity

(le

sio

n a

rea

, m

m2(

Days after infection

Page 26 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Figure 2

0

2

4

6

Rela

tive m

RN

A l

evel

(fo

ld c

han

ge

) BTH 0.01

T39 0.04

T39 0.4

Conc. (%)

Page 27 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

Figure 3

0

1

2

3Chi9

Water T39

0.4

T39

0.04

BTH

0.01

0

1

2

3 GluB

Water T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04

0

1

2

3

4PR1a

Water T39

0.4

T39

0.04

BTH

0.01

0

2

4

6 SAMT

Water T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04

Rela

tive m

RN

A level (

fold

ch

an

ge)

Inducer and concentration (%)

Botrytis cinerea

- +

Page 28 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

0

1

2Pti4

0

1

2 Erf1

0

5

10

15

20Pti5

0

1

2

3 ACO1

Figure 4

Water T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04 Water

T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04

Water T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04 Water

T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04

Re

lati

ve m

RN

A l

evel (

fold

ch

an

ge)

Inducer and concentration (%)

Botrytis cinerea

- +

Page 29 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.

0

1TomloxA

0

10

20

30 PI2

0

1

2

3

4

TomloxD

0

1

2

3

TomloxC

Figure 5

Re

lati

ve m

RN

A le

vel (

fold

ch

ange

)

Inducer and concentration (%)

Water T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04 Water

T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04

Water T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04 Water

T39

0.4

BTH

0.01

T39

0.04

Botrytis cinerea

- +

Page 30 of 30Ph

ytop

atho

logy

"Fi

rst L

ook"

pap

er •

http

://dx

.doi

.org

/10.

1094

/PH

YT

O-0

2-13

-004

3-R

• p

oste

d 09

/18/

2013

Thi

s pa

per

has

been

pee

r re

view

ed a

nd a

ccep

ted

for

publ

icat

ion

but h

as n

ot y

et b

een

copy

edite

d or

pro

ofre

ad. T

he f

inal

pub

lishe

d ve

rsio

n m

ay d

iffe

r.