Role of structural details in altering the expected seismic response of bridges
Grazing triggers soil carbon loss by altering plant roots and their control on soil microbial...
Transcript of Grazing triggers soil carbon loss by altering plant roots and their control on soil microbial...
SPECIAL FEATURE
PLANT–SOIL INTERACTIONS AND THE CARBON CYCLE
Grazing triggers soil carbon loss by altering plant
roots and their control on soil microbial community
Katja Klumpp1‡, Sebastien Fontaine1*‡, Eleonore Attard2, Xavier Le Roux2†,
Gerd Gleixner3 and Jean-Francois Soussana1
1INRA, UR874 Grassland Ecosystem Research, 234, Av. du Brezet, F-63100 Clermont-Ferrand, France; 2INRA,
CNRS, Universite de Lyon 1, Microbial Ecology, UMR 5557, 43 Bd du 11 novembre 1918, 69622 Villeurbanne,
France; and 3Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Postbox 100164, D-07701 Jena, Germany
Summary
1. Depending on grazing intensity, grasslands tend towards two contrasting systems that differ in
terms of species diversity and soil carbon (C) storage. To date, effects of grazing on C cycling have
mainly been studied in grasslands subject to constant grazing regimes, whereas little is known for
grasslands experiencing a change in grazing intensity. Analysing the transition between C-storing
and C-releasing grasslands under low- and high-grazing regimes, respectively, will help to identify
key plant–soil interactions for C cycling.
2. The transition was studied in a mesocosm experiment with grassland monoliths submitted to a
change in grazing after 14 years of constant high and low grazing. Plant–soil interactions were anal-
ysed by following the dynamics of plant and microbial communities, roots and soil organic matter
fractions over 2 years. After disturbance change, mesocosms were continuously exposed to13C-labelled CO2, which allowed us to trace both the incorporation of new litter C produced by a
modified plant community in soil and the fate of old unlabelled litter C.
3. Changing disturbance intensity led to a cascade of events. After shift to high disturbance, photo-
synthesis decreased followed by a decline in root biomass and a change in plant community struc-
ture 1.5 months later. Those changes led to a decrease of soil fungi, a proliferation of Gram(+)
bacteria and accelerated decomposition of old particulate organic C (<6 months). At last, acceler-
ated decomposition released plant available nitrogen and decreased soil C storage. Our results indi-
cate that intensified grazing triggers proliferation of Gram(+) bacteria and subsequent faster
decomposition by reducing roots adapted to low disturbance.
4. Synthesis. Plant communities exert control on microbial communities and decomposition
through the activity of their living roots: slow-growing plants adapted to low disturbance reduce
Gram(+) bacteria, decomposition of low and high quality litter, nitrogen availability and, thus,
ingress of fast-growing plants. Our results indicate that grazing impacts on soil carbon storage by
altering plant roots and their control on the soil microbial community and decomposition, and that
these processes will foster decomposition and soil C loss inmore productive and disturbed grassland
systems.
Key-words: ARISA, carbon cycling, decomposition, disturbance, grassland, management,
microbial community, nitrogen cycling, particulate organic matter, PLFA
Introduction
Understanding the impact of disturbances (grazing, cultiva-
tion, climate variability) on linkages between above-ground
and below-ground biota is essential to predicting the conse-
quences of land use and global change for soil C cycling. Over
*Correspondence author. E-mail: [email protected]
†Present address: Fondation pour la recherche sur la biodiversite, 57
rue Cuvier, CP 41, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France.
‡The first two authors have contributed equally to this work.
Journal of Ecology 2009, 97, 876–885 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01549.x
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society
the last 20 years, theses questions have inspired various exper-
iments in forests and grasslands (Pickett & White 1986;
McNaughton, Banyikwa & McNaughton 1997; Bardgett &
McAlistair 1999; Wardle et al. 2008). Hence, we are now able
to define principles that are at least applicable to disturbances
such as grazing and cultivation (Wardle et al. 2004; Bardgett
et al. 2005). Depending on the intensity of disturbance,
ecosystems tend towards two contrasting systems that differ
in terms of functional diversity of biota, C storage and pri-
mary production. For example, intensively grazed grasslands
are dominated by fast-growing plant species producing litter
of high quality (low C ⁄N ratio and lignin content) that are
quickly decomposed by bacteria (Seastedt 1985; Berendse,
Bobbink & Rouwenhorst 1989; McNaughton, Banyikwa &
McNaughton 1997; Bardgett, Wardle & Yeates 1998). As a
result, in these productive ecosystems, C storage in the soil–
litter continuum is relatively low (C-releasing ecosystem)
(Milchunas & Lauenroth 1993). Grasslands adapted to low
grazing levels, on the other hand, are dominated by fungi and
slow-growing plants species and exhibit larger C storage
(C-storing ecosystem) and lower above-ground net primary
productivity than productive ecosystems.
However, the influence of disturbance on biotic communi-
ties and ecosystem functioning has mainly been studied in
grasslands and forests either under constant disturbance (i.e.
close to steady-state) and ⁄or along chronosequences where
many factors are likely to covary (soil mineralogy, soil
depth, climate) (Wardle et al. 2004; Bardgett et al. 2005;
Patra et al. 2006; but see Bardgett & McAlistair 1999). Con-
sequently, the mechanistic basis of the transition between
undisturbed C-storing and disturbed C-releasing ecosystems
is less known. Plant communities, litter pools, decomposer
communities and soil processes are linked in feedback loops
which make it difficult to determine the major ecological
drivers (see Bardgett et al. 2005). For example, it has been
proposed that frequent grazing favours fast-growing plant
species that allocate carbon to growth rather than to second-
ary defences (i.e lignin) and which decrease litter quality
(e.g. Wardle et al. 2004). In that case, plant species would
feedback on soil communities and processes through litter
quality (Seastedt 1985; Berendse, Bobbink & Rouwenhorst
1989; Bardgett et al. 2005; De Deyn & Van der Putten
2005). However, in some cases, grazing has been shown to
affect soil microbial communities before plant communities,
suggesting that the shift in ecosystem functioning is not nec-
essarily caused by a change in plant litter quality (Patra
et al. 2005). Finally, recent studies have shown that grasses
strongly affect litter decomposition via the presence of their
living roots which modify the environment of decomposers
(Van der Krift et al. 2001; Van der Krift, Kuikman &
Berendse 2002; Personeni & Loiseau 2004). As grazing
affects root biomass and activity (Holland & Detling 1990;
Guitan & Bardgett 2000; Hamilton & Frank 2001) changes
in soil communities and litter decomposition may be pro-
voked by a change in living roots rather than litter quality.
Given the lack of knowledge, the role of plant–grazer–
decomposer interactions on the control of ecosystem C-N
fluxes is rarely included in current geochemical models, which
partly explains discrepancies between predictions and empiri-
cal results (Fontaine & Barot 2005). A better understanding of
the nature of links between plant and soil communities and
ecosystem functioning after a change in disturbance will con-
tribute to build new models including functional diversity of
biota. Thesemodels may providemore accurate predictions on
the impact of disturbance and diversity loss on ecosystem pro-
ductivity andC storage.
A mesocosm study with semi-natural grasslands showed a
trade-off between above-ground productivity (i.e annual net
primary productivity, ANPP) and below-ground carbon stor-
age when these grasslands were submitted to a change in dis-
turbance (simulated grazing) after 14 years of constant high
and low grazing intensity. Both pre-experimental (field) and
experimental low disturbance favoured above- and below-
ground C storage (Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne 2007a).
Moreover, this trade-off was partly assigned to community
aggregated leaf (specific leaf area, leaf dry-matter content) and
root and rhizome traits (specific length, tissue density), which
responded significantly to (changes in) disturbance (Klumpp
& Soussana 2009).
Here, by using the same mesocosm experiment, we study
the mechanistic basis of the transition between undisturbed
C-storing and disturbed C-releasing grassland ecosystems.
Given that plant species influence litter decomposition via
the presence of living roots and that disturbance modifies
root biomass and activity (e.g. Holland & Detling 1990; Van
der Krift et al. 2001), we hypothesize that disturbance affects
soil C cycling by altering plant roots and their control on
microbial community and decomposition. To study these
mechanisms, we analysed in detail the dynamics of plant and
microbial communities, plant roots, soil organic matter frac-
tions and N leaching over 2 years. After a change in distur-
bance, mesocosms were continuously exposed to 13C-labelled
CO2, allowing to trace both the incorporation of new litter
C produced by a modified plant community and the fate of
old unlabelled litter C. Analysing the transition between
undisturbed C-storing and disturbed C-releasing ecosystems
will help identify key plant–soil interactions for C cycling
and geochemical models.
Materials and methods
EXPERIMENT WITH GRASSLAND MONOLITHS AND
MANAGEMENT
The study was carried out with grassland monoliths from a perma-
nent semi-natural mesic pasture that had been subjected to high- and
low-intensity sheep grazing without fertilization for the last 14 years
(Louault et al. 2005). High-intensity grazing, and therefore high dis-
turbance (H) prior to the experiment, meant that grassland was cut
once and sheep-grazed four times per year, whereas under low-inten-
sity grazing [pre-experimental low disturbance (L)], grassland was
grazed by sheep once a year only. Grassland under high disturbance
was dominated byHolcus lanatus, Lolium perenne, Agrostis capillaris,
Festuca arundinacea, Taraxacum officinale and Trifolium repens,
while grassland under low disturbance was dominated by Elytrigia
Effect of grazing on ecosystem carbon cycling 877
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
repens, Agrostis capillaris, Arrhenatherum elatius, Festuca rubra and
Vicia cracca (data not shown).
Procedures to select and extract grassland monoliths are described
by Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne (2007a). Briefly, in June 2002,
48 monoliths (L 0.5 · W 0.5 · H 0.4 m) were sampled from the two
grassland plots. Following extraction, 24 monoliths of each pre-
experimental treatment were placed in eight mesocosms closed by
transparent canopy enclosures (L 1.5 · W0.5 · H0.75 m), each con-
taining three monoliths of the same disturbance treatment. Meso-
cosms were placed in natural light and outdoor temperatures. To
reduce light transmission from the side, dark plastic edges of 10 to
20 cm height were placed around each monolith throughout the
experiment (seeKlumpp, Soussana&Falcimagne 2007a). Air humid-
ity was adjusted to outdoor conditions. Monoliths were watered one
to three times a week to target a soil water potential of c.)30 kPa.
After the transfer into mesocosms, ‘high’ grazing disturbance (H)
was simulated by cutting at 5 cm height and applying artificial urine
(5 g N m)2, see Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne 2007a) five times
per year. The low-disturbance (L) monoliths were neither cut nor fer-
tilized during the experiment. After 6 months of acclimatization
(from now on referred as t0), half of the monoliths of each treatment
were switched to the opposite disturbance treatment, resulting in four
replicate mesocosms each with constant low disturbance (LL), con-
stant high disturbance (HH), a shift to high disturbance (LH) and a
shift to low disturbance (HL).
All 16 mesocosms were henceforth continuously exposed to13C-labelled CO2. For d13C labelling, outdoor air was scrubbed from
H2O and CO2, which was then replaced by fossil-fuel derived CO2
depleted in 13C (d13C )34.7 ± 0.03&). Thereafter, the 13C-labelled
air was humidified, mixed with temperature-regulated cooled out-
door air (30%) and distributed to the mesocosms. During night time,
mesocosmswere providedwith unlabelled air. ThemeanCO2 concen-
tration inside the mesocosms was held close to the outdoor CO2
concentration (425 ± 39 lmol mol)1; mean difference of 13.2 ±
z9.5 mol mol)1) and had on average a d13C signature of )21.5(±0.27 &) during the two-year experiment. Air flow and CO2 con-
centration in each mesocosm was monitored continuously during the
two-year experiment (see Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne 2007a for
full details on themethod).
PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND NITROGEN
NUTRIT ION INDEX
Analyses of plant community structure comprising botanical
composition and plant functional traits were carried out after mono-
lith extraction in September 2002 and then five times during the
course of the experiment (1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the start of
the experiment). Measured shoot and root and rhizome traits were:
vegetative height, specific leaf area (SLA), leaf dry matter content
(LDMC) and leaf nitrogen content (LNC), specific length (SL) and
tissue density of roots and rhizomes (DENS) (for methodologies
see Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne 2007a; Klumpp & Soussana
2009).
The Nitrogen Nutrition Index (NNI) evaluates N availability of
the vegetation and was calculated according to Lemaire & Salette
(1983) from nitrogen content of live biomass (in N%) and green
above-ground biomass (in t DMha)1) as: (N% ⁄ (4.8DM)0.32).
SOIL ORGANIC MATTER FRACTIONS
Soil was sampled once before the start of 13C labelling (t0) and then
five times during the experiment (at 1.5, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months). At
each soil harvest, half a monolith per mesocosm was sampled. The
remaining half was sealed with a stainless steel plate and the empty
space was filled with sand. Vertical soil slices (L 0.4 · l 0.06 · H
0.3 m) of the sampled monoliths were split into three horizontal lay-
ers (0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm). The soil layers were air-dried and
free organic matter (OM) fractions were separated with water by
passing the soil through a series of three brass sieves of decreasing
mesh sizes (1.0, 0.2 and 0.05 mm) (wet sieving). The remaining mate-
rial in each sieve was separated into the organic and mineral fraction
by density flotation in water (Loiseau & Soussana 1999). Organic
fractions containing roots (R), rhizomes (Rh), coarse (>1 mm) and
fine (0.2 to 1 mm) particulate organic matter (POM) were oven-dried
and analysed for their C content and d13C. Hence forward, root and
rhizomewere added together (R + Rh).
GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE EUBACTERIAL
COMMUNITY
For each soil sampling date, DNA was extracted using the Fast-
DNA� SPIN Kit for Soil (BIO 101� Systems, Qbiogene, Carlsbad,
CA, USA) and bacterial community structure was characterized by
Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) using a modified
method from Ranjard et al. (2000) (for details see Attard et al. 2008).
The ARISA method, which gives a molecular fingerprint of the soil
community, is a rapid method to set up and was used to follow tem-
poral changes in microbial community structure. However, this
method does not give any information on the microbial community
and its activity.
PLFA ANALYSES
To better describe the microbial community and its role on soil pro-
cesses, phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) and their d13C signature were
determined before (t0) and 18 months after disturbance change from
fresh soil samples (depth 0–10 cm, sieved at 2 mm). PLFA and their
d13C signature were analysed according to Zelles (1999) and Kramer
& Gleixner (2006). The PLFA-methyl esters were corrected for
methyl carbon (MeOH) introduced during methylation to obtain
d13C values of PLFAs. PLFA nomenclature was used as described by
Frostegard & Baath (1996) and Zelles (1999). Saturated, branched-
chain fatty acids (14:0iso, 15:0iso, 15:0anteiso, 16:0, 16:0n, 17:0br,
17:0n) were associated with Gram-positive bacteria. Monounsatu-
rated and cyclopropyl-substituted PLFAs (16:0br, 16:1x7br, cy17:0,17:1x8br, 18:1x7 and cy19:0) were associated with Gram-negative
bacteria (Ratledge & Wilkinson 1988) and 18:1x9 and 18:2x6 with
saprophytic fungal lipids. C16:1x5, 20:3 and 20:4 indicated arbuscu-
lar mycorrhizal fungi (Jabaji-Hare 1988; Olsson 1999) and the PLFAs
10Me-C16:0 were used to indicate soil actinomycetes (Kroppenstedt,
Greinermai & Kornwendisch 1984; Brennan 1988). Individual
PLFAs and communities (fungal, gram(+), gram()), mycorrhizal
fungi and actinomycetes) are expressed in percentage peak area.
1 3C TERMINOLOGY AND ANALYSES
The fraction of ‘old’ unlabelled C (f Cold) and ‘new’ C derived from13C-labelling (f Cnew) in roots and rhizomes, coarse and fine POM,
and individual PLFAwere calculated by amass balance equation:
f Cnew ¼ ðd13Csample � d13CcontrolÞ=ðd13Cinput � d13CcontrolÞ eqn 1
f Cold ¼ 1� f Cnew eqn 2
878 K. Klumpp et al.
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
where d13Csample is the d13C of the sample, d13Ccontrol is the d13Cvalue before the start of labelling (t0) and d13Cinput is the mean
d13C value of the fully labelled green leaves during the experiment
()40.4& ± SD 2.7). d13Cinput was more depleted in winter than
in spring (P < 0.05), but did not differ between disturbance
treatments (P > 0.1) (see Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne
2007b for more details).
MODEL APPROACH
Rootmortality and decomposition rates of particulate organic matter
(POM) were determined by a carbon flux model. The model was con-
strained to measured quantities of old (unlabelled) and new (labelled)
carbon in root biomass and particulate organic matter in the upper 0–
10 cm soil layer during the 2-year experiment (see Model flowchart,
Fig. 1). The model comprises six compartments (expressed in mg C
g)1 soil): new C and old C in roots (Rootnew and Rootold), coarse par-
ticulate organic matter (cPOMnew and cPOMold) and fine particulate
organic matter (fPOMnew and fPOMold). The Rootnew compartment
is supplied by a fraction (s) of the daily net plant photosynthesis (Anet
in mg C g)1 soil) measured by gas exchange. Root turnover (mortal-
ity, m) releases particulate organic matter supplying carbon with a
fraction (b) to the fPOM and a fraction (1- b) to the cPOM compart-
ment. The cPOMand fPOM compartments have distinct decomposi-
tion rates, (kc) and (kf). The decomposition of coarse POM releases
CO2 with a fraction (1-a) and supplies the fPOMcompartment with a
fraction (a). Therefore, the model comprises six equations allowing to
calculate six parameter unknowns (s,m, b, a, kc and kf):
d
dtðRoldÞ ¼ �m�Rold � Tair eqn 3
d
dtðcPOMoldÞ ¼ m� ð1� bÞ �Rold � Tair
� kc � cPOMold � Tair
eqn 4
d
dtðfPOMoldÞ ¼ m� b�Rold � Tair
þ kc � a� cPOMold � Tair
� kf � fPOMold � Tair
eqn 5
d
dtðRnewÞ ¼ Anet � s�m�Rnew � Tair eqn 6
d
dtðcPOMnewÞ ¼ m� ð1� bÞ �Rnew � Tair
� kc � cPOMnew � Tair
eqn 7
d
dtðfPOMnewÞ ¼ m� b�Rnew � Tair
þ kc � a� cPOMnew � Tair
� kf � fPOMnew � Tair
eqn 8
The model was fitted to measured data of four replicate mesocosms
per treatment by using Berkeley-Madonna software. The model was
run in thermal time (Tair, in degree days) by using daily temperature
means in mesocosms. Parameters (s, m, b, a, kc and kf) are therefore
expressed in (degree days)1). Mean residence times (MRT, in years)
of carbon in roots and rhizomes, coarse POM and fine POMwas cal-
culated as 1 ⁄m, 1 ⁄ kc and 1 ⁄ kf divided by a mean (for the 2 years of
the experiment) annual temperature sum of 4500 �C.
DATA ANALYSIS
anovas were performed for particulate organic matter fractions and
PLFAs to test differences between constant low disturbance (LL),
shift to high disturbance (LH), constant high disturbance (HH)
and shift to low disturbance (HL). Differences were tested with a
Fisher-LSD post hoc test. When necessary, data was log-trans-
formed prior to analysis to satisfy Shapiro–Wilk’s test of normality.
Statistical analyses were performed with the statistica 6 package
(StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). With the primer software (PRI-
MER-E Ltd., Plymouth, UK) rank similarity matrices were com-
puted and used to construct ‘maps’ highlighting the similarity or
dissimilarity of bacterial and plant community structure among
samples by non-metric multidimensional scaling (MDS) (Kruskal
& Wish 1978). Similarity percentages (SIMPER) were computed to
quantify the percentage of dissimilarity between treatments,
whereas one-way analyses of similarity (ANOSIM) were performed
to test differences between treatments at each sampling by using
the primer software package (Plymouth Routines In Multivariate
Ecological Research).
TIME SCALE
Not all measures can be conducted at the same frequency because of
methodological constrains. The frequency of each analysis is reported
inAppendix S1 in Supporting Information.
Results
DESCRIPTION OF GRASSLANDS MAINTAINED UNDER
CONSTANT LOW AND HIGH DISTURBANCE
Grasslandmonoliths maintained under constant low (LL) and
high (HH) disturbance had a significantly different botanical
composition (Fig. 2a). The plant communities of the HH and
LL treatments exhibited divergent community aggregated
morphological traits (see dissimilarity Fig. 2b). The HH plant
Rootold c
Rootnew fPOMnew
fPOMold
m s 1-β
β
α
α
β
1-β
1 1-
α
kc
m Anet kf
kf
cPOMnew
cPOMold m
1-α
kc
Fig.1. Model flowchart. New and old C in roots (Rootnew andRootold), coarse particulate organic matter (cPOMnew and cPOMold) and fine par-
ticulate organic matter (fPOMnew and fPOMold). (s) is fraction of the daily net plant photosynthesis (Anet) going to Rootnew; (m) root turnover
(mortality); (kc) and (kf) decomposition rates of cPOM and fPOM compartments; (b) and (1- b) fraction of decomposed roots going to fPOM
and cPOM; (a) and (1-a) fraction of decomposed cPOMgoing to fPOMand released as CO2.
Effect of grazing on ecosystem carbon cycling 879
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
community was characterized by high specific leaf area (SLA),
high leaf nitrogen content (LNC) and low mean plant height
(mHeight) indicating a fast growth strategy (i.e. nutrient
exploitation). The LL plant community had a low SLA, low
LNC and an increased LDMC and mHeight, characterizing a
slower plant growth strategy (i.e. nutrient conservation) than
theHHplant community (data not shown).
Differences in plant community structure were mirrored by
differences in soil C dynamics and microbial community. The
amount of coarse and fine particulate organic matter (POM)
was higher at low (LL) compared to high (HH) disturbance
(Fig. 3). Moreover, during the 13C labelling experiment, the
amount of old (unlabelled) carbon in roots and rhizomes and
in coarse and fine POM declined at a slower rate in LL than
HH soils, indicating a slower microbial decomposition of
POM in the LL treatment (Fig. 3 & Table 1). The bacterial
community structure, characterized by the ARISA method,
differed significantly between soils of high and low disturbance
(Fig. 2c). This difference was also supported by PLFA data.
Low- compared to high-disturbance soil showed a higher frac-
tion of fungal (including arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) and
individual Gram()) PLFAs, and a lower fraction of Gram(+)
and actinomycetes PLFA (Table 2).
After 18 months of 13C labelling, only a small quantity of
new C (1–3% of total) was incorporated in Gram()) and
Gram(+) bacteria PLFA irrespective of disturbance treatments
(Table 2). This result indicated that those decomposers either
fed on pre-experimental soil organic matter or most of them
were in a dormant stage. In contrast, soil fungi dependedmore
on the newly fixed plant C as the higher percentages of new C
(9–13% of total) compared to bacteria indicated. Overall, the
percentages of newC in total PLFA biomarkers were higher in
HH than in LL, demonstrating a higher microbial biomass
turnover under high disturbance.
DYNAMICS OF ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING AFTER A
DISTURBANCE CHANGE
Hours and days following the cut of above-ground biomass,
plant photosynthesis rate decreased in monoliths previously
adapted to low disturbance (LH). This was followed by a net
emission of CO2 during daytime for several days, indicating
that plant shoot respiration exceeded photosynthesis (for
details seeKlumpp, Soussana&Falcimagne 2007a).
1.5 month after a shift to high disturbance (LH versus LL),
plant community structure changed significantly (Fig. 2a),
Per
cent
age
of d
issi
mila
rity
Month after management change
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
0
20
40
60
Bacterial community
NSNS
NS
*** *
***
0
20
40
60
80
100 (a)
(b)
(c)
Plant community
*
NS
*
NS NSNS
* **
*
0
10
20
30
40
*
**
NS
*
***
Plant functional traits
Fig.2. Percentage of dissimilarity for plant (a) and functional traits of leaves (b) and bacterial community (c) between treatments submitted to
constant disturbance (LL versusHH,•), shift to high disturbance (LH versus LL,s) and shift to low disturbance (HL versusHH,r). Data points
are means of four replicates per treatment for percentage of dissimilarity being significant (*, P £ 0.05) or not (NS). In all three graphs, the two
constant disturbance treatments (HH versus LL,•) were significantly dissimilar (P £ 0.05) throughout the experiment. For plant species composi-
tion, percentage of dissimilarity was determined for species (n = 30) with a presence throughout the experiment (>1%). Dissimilarity of plant
functional traits was determined by using specific leaf area, leaf drymatter content and leaf nitrogen content.
880 K. Klumpp et al.
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
showing a shift fromhigh-stature plant species (i.e.Elytrigia re-
pens, Arrhenatherum elatius, Holcus lanatus, Cirsium sp., Vicia
sp.) to low-stature plant species (i.e.Agrostis capillaris, Dactylis
glomerata) supporting frequent cuts (data not shown). Species
replacement resulted in considerable changes of community
aggregated traits (Fig. 2b) that were related tomodified growth
conditions (i.e. light, nutrients, regrowth) and defoliation
intensity. For example, a shift from LL to LH increased spe-
cific leaf area (SLA) and leaf nitrogen content (LNC). How-
ever, a shift to low disturbance (HL versus HH) lead to non
significant changes in plant species community, indicating, a
shift to less frequent disturbance, modifies botanical composi-
tion only slowly (Fig. 2a).
Six months after shift to high disturbance (LH versus LL),
less old C was found in roots and rhizome due to an increased
mortality (and reserve mobilization) of root and rhizome tis-
sues (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Both, increased root mortality and
lower transfer of new C to roots and rhizomes resulted in a
reduction of total root and rhizome mass (Fig. 3). Despite the
greater input of old C into soil, caused by the increased root
and rhizome mortality, the amount of old C in cPOM and
fPOM remained unchanged (Fig. 3). Model results indicate
that microbial decomposition of old POM was accelerated
Month after start of 13C labelling
Old
R +
Rh
mg
C g
–1 s
oil
0
2
4
6
8
a
a
b b
a
b
b c
a
a
b c
a a
b c
a a b c
a
b
Old
cP
OM
m
g C
g–1
soi
l
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
a
a
b b
a
a a a
b
b
a
b
b a
b
a
b b b
b
a
a
Old
fPO
Mm
g C
g–1
soi
l
0 5 10 15 20 250.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
b
a
b
b
a
b
a
a
a
a a a a
a b b
a a a a
a
a
Tot
al R
+ R
hm
g C
g–1
soi
l
0
2
4
6
8
a
a
b
b
b
b
a
b c
a
a
a a
a
a
b
a
a b
c c
b*
Tot
al c
PO
Mm
g C
g–1
soi
l
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
b
a a a
b
a a
b b b
a
a
a ab ab b
b b b
b b b
Tot
al fP
OM
mg
C g
–1 s
oil
0 5 10 15 20 250.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
a
b a
a
b b
b
a
aaaa
a
a
a
a a
a b
b b
b
Fig.3. Total and old C in roots and rhizomes (R + Rh), coarse particulate organic matter (cPOM) and fine particulate organic matter (fPOM)
during 13C-labelling experiment in the 0–10 cm soil layer. Four treatments were studied: constant low (LL,•) and high (HH, .) experimental dis-
turbance, and shift to low (HL,r) and high (LH,s) disturbance. Data are means of four replicate mesocosms. Letters indicate significant differ-
ences (P £ 0.05) between treatments for a given date.
Table 1. Mean residence times (MRT, in years; Flowchart Fig. 1) of
carbon in roots and rhizomes, coarse (cPOM) and fine (fPOM)
particulate organic matter in pasture monoliths with constant low
disturbance (LL), constant high disturbance (HH), shift to low (HL)
and shift to high (LH) disturbance. Results are means of four
replicates per treatment. For a given compartment, letters indicate
significant differences (P £ 0.05) between treatments; n = 3 as one
replicate was randomly left out each time. When appropriate, data
was log-transformed prior to analysis to conform to the assumption
of normality
Treatment Compartment MRT (years)
LL Root & rhizomes 2.3a
LH 1.0bc
HH 0.9b
HL 1.8ac
LL cPOM 0.4a
LH 0.2b
HH 0.3b
HL 0.5a
LL fPOM 0.9ac
LH 0.7b
HH 1.0c
HL 1.3c
Effect of grazing on ecosystem carbon cycling 881
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
after disturbance was intensified (LH) (Table 1). The shift to
reduced disturbance (HL versus HH) increased root and rhi-
zome biomass through a reduction of root mortality (Fig. 3
and Table 1). Despite the reduced transfer of old C from roots
to POM, the amount of C in POM remained constant (Fig. 3),
indicating a reduced decomposition rate in this fraction
(Table 1). Changes in decomposition rates of old C in the LH
and HL treatments were parallel to a significant change in
bacterial community revealed by theARISAmethod (Fig. 2c).
Twelve months after a shift to high disturbance (LH),
markedly less old C was detected in coarse and fine POM,
confirming a substantial acceleration of the decomposition
of pre-experimental POM (Fig. 3). Modelling shows that
decomposition rates of cPOM and fPOM were accelerated by
50% and 80%, respectively, after intensified disturbances
(LH), leading to a reduction of total particulate organic C
(Fig. 3). In contrast, decomposition rates of cPOM and
fPOM were decelerated by 70% and 30%, respectively, after
reduced disturbance (HL), increasing total particulate
organic C. The acceleration of POM decomposition in the
LH treatment released large amounts of nutrients. Considering
differences in organic nitrogen of R + Rh and POM within
the 0–30 cm soil layer between the LL and LH treatment, an
amount of 14.3 g N m)2 (143 kg N ha)1) was released
through accelerated microbial decomposition (Table S2 in
Supporting Information). Most released N was retained by
grassland monoliths as loss of N through leaching was low
(0.8 g N m)2 year)1). Together with N fertilization this addi-
tional N contributed to a higher nitrogen nutrition index
(Lemaire & Salette 1983) in the LH (0.76 ± 0.05) compared
to the LL treatment (0.56 ± 0.05). In the HL treatment,
the deceleration of POM decomposition sequestrated
3.8 g N m)2 (38 kg N ha)1).
Eighteen months after management change, analyses of
PLFAs allowed a better description of changes in themicrobial
community and their consequences on decomposition pro-
cesses. Intensified disturbance (LH) decreased the fraction of
fungal PLFA by a factor of 2 and increased the fraction of
Gram(+) bacteria by a factor of 2 (Table 2). The percentage of
new labelled C in Gram(+) bacteria PLFA was less than 5%,
indicating that these microorganisms mostly decomposed old
POM deposited prior to disturbance change. Reduced
disturbance (HL) did not significantly change microbial com-
munities (Table 2). Thus, as supported by analyses of micro-
bial DNA (Fig. 1), the ‘recovery’ of a fungi-dominated soil
microbial community after reduced disturbance ismuch slower
than the proliferation of Gram(+) after intensified disturbance.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (e.g. 16:1x5, 20:3 and 20:4) and
Table 2. Mean relative abundance of individual PLFAs and percentage (%) of new C in PLFAs of fungal, Gram()) and Gram(+) bacteria,
mycorrhizal fungi and actinomycetes in pasture monoliths with constant low disturbance (LL), shift to high disturbance (LH), constant high
disturbance (HH) and shift to low disturbance (HL). For a given date, letters indicate significant difference (P-values £ 0.05, bold) between
treatments. Datawere arcsine-transformed prior to analysis to conform to the assumption of normality
Time community PLFA
t0 t18 month
LL HH LL LH HH HL
Fungal 18:1 x9 21a 19b 27a 17 b 20ab 20ab
18:2 x6 6a 5a 11a 3b 7ab 3b
Total 27a 24b 38a 20b 27b 23b
%new C 9a
13a 9a 13a
Gram()) 16:1 x7 br 11a 9a 7a 7a 11b
8a
17:1 x8 4a
3b 5ab 2a 2
a8b
18:1 x7 13a 12a 15a 11ab 12ab 8b
cy 17:0 br 2a 2a 1a 2b 2b 2b
cy 19:0 7a
13b
7a
11b 11b 12b
Total 37a
39a 35a 33a 38a 38a
%new C 1a 2a 4c 3bc
Gram(+) 16:0 n 9a
11b
6a
12b 8b 10b
17:0 br 4a 4a 1a 5b 4b 5b
n 1a 2b 0a 2b 1b 2b
a 15:0 8a
10b
6a
10bc 8ac 10bc
i 15:0 4a
6b
3a
7b 4ab 3a
Total 26a
33b
17a
34b 26c 29c
%new C 2a 3b 2a 4c
Mycorrhizal fungi 16:1 x5 7a 2b 6a 6a 5a 7a
20:3 0.4a 0 b 1a 1a 0.6a 0.4a
20:4 2a 1a 4a 5a 3ab 1b
Total 9a
3b 11a 12a 8a 9a
%new C 1a 1a 2b 2b
Actinomycetes 16:0 10Me 1a
2b 0a 0.5a 1
ab2b
%new C 0 a 0 a 0 a 0.1b
882 K. Klumpp et al.
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
actinomycetes (16:0 10Me) were not affected by disturbance
change.
Discussion
The description of grassland monoliths maintained under
constant low and high grazing disturbance for the last 14 years
was consistent with the commonly observed pattern (e.g. De
Deyn, Cornelissen & Bardgett 2008; Bardgett et al. 2005;
Wardle et al. 2004 etc). Grassland mesocosms exposed to low
disturbance were characterized by high-stature plant species
with a slow-growth strategy, fungi-dominated soil community
and slow soil C cycling (i.e. C-storing grassland) (Fig. 2,
Tables 1 and 2). In contrast, grassland mesocosms exposed to
high grazing were dominated by small-stature plant species
with a fast-growth strategy, bacteria-dominated soil commu-
nity, higher above-ground productivity and lower soil carbon
storage (i.e. C-releasing grassland) (see Klumpp, Soussana &
Falcimagne 2007a). Hence, the studiedmesocosms are a useful
proxy to investigate the mechanistic basis of the transition
between undisturbed C-storing and disturbed C-releasing
ecosystems.
HOW DOES THE TRANSIT ION OCCUR?
Changing the frequency of disturbance led to a cascade of
effects which tend to be opposed between intensified and
reduced disturbance treatments. Shift to high disturbance led,
within hours, to a sharp decrease in canopy photosynthesis
during daytime and net emission of CO2 for several days.
During this time, plant respiration exceeded plant photosyn-
thesis, and reserve remobilization and C starvation were likely
to increased root mortality (Table 1). 1.5 months after a shift
to high disturbance (LH versus LL), plant and soil community
structure changed significantly. Changes in plant community
structure were assigned to a replacement of slow-growing
high-stature plant species by fast-growing low-stature plant
species, which do support frequent defoliations.
These changes induced a decrease in root biomass and an
acceleration of old (pre-experimental) POM decomposition
within 6 months following the shift to high disturbance
(Fig. 2). The accelerated mineralization of old POM was con-
current to a proliferation of Gram(+) bacteria and a decline in
the fungal and Gram()) communities (Table 2). The fact that
only a small amount of new labelled C (<5%) was found in
Gram(+) bacteria indicated that these microorganisms mostly
decomposed old POM. Hence, the accelerated mineralization
of POMwas provoked by a proliferation of Gram(+) bacteria.
Changes in mineralization could not be ascribed to mineral
nitrogen supply as the increase in decomposition rate (50 and
80% for coarse and fine POM, respectively, Table 1) was ten
times higher than the observed effects of N addition in grass-
lands (Van der Krift, Kuikman & Berendse 2002; Manning
et al. 2008). Moreover, it is well established that N% of about
1.7 is sufficient to cover the requirements of microbes (Waks-
man & Tenney 1927; Melin 1930; Parton et al. 2007). Thus,
although decomposition of roots and coarse POMmay require
an additional source of nitrogen (N%was 1.1% and 1.4% for
roots and fine POM, respectively, see Table S1 in Supporting
Information), N addition was not likely to be the main driver
of the accelerated decomposition of fine POM (N% was 1.6).
Consequently, intensified grazing triggers proliferation of
Gram(+) bacteria and subsequent faster decomposition by
reducing plant roots adapted to low disturbance.
These results support our hypothesis that disturbance affects
soil C cycling by altering plant roots and their control on
microbial community and decomposition. At last, the acceler-
ated POM mineralization decreased soil carbon storage
(Table 1) and released plant available nitrogen, which contrib-
uted to the higher above-ground primary production of these
LH monoliths (Klumpp, Soussana & Falcimagne 2007a).
However, N losses through leaching were doubled (0.8 g and
0.4 g N m)2 years)1 in the LH compared to the LL treat-
ment), providing evidence that less frequently disturbed eco-
systems better retain nutrients.
Overall, changes in plant and soil community structure and
related processes were slower with reduced disturbance than
intensified disturbance. This difference could be explained by
contrasting growth rates of plant and microbial communities
in disturbed and undisturbed grasslands. After intensified dis-
turbance, new conditions created by defoliation (high avail-
ability of light and nutrients) allow fast-growing plant species
to dominate quickly, leading to a rapid change in soil pro-
cesses. In contrast, after reduced disturbance, an exclusion of
fast-growing plant species is slow and depends on the depletion
of key resources by slow-growing plant species. Moreover, the
slower transition may be exacerbated by the soil community
since soil fungi commonly have a slower growth rate than bac-
teria (Swift, Heal & Anderson 1979). The transition between
fast- and slow-growing communities therefore explains why,
after cessation of disturbance, the C storage capacity recovers
more slowly than this capacity is lost after intensified distur-
bance (Fig. 3).
ABOVE-GROUND AND BELOW-GROUND INTERACTIONS
CONTROLLED THROUGH LIV ING ROOT ACTIV ITY
It has been proposed that plant communities control soil
microbial communities and subsequent processes through lit-
ter quality (Seastedt 1985; Berendse, Bobbink & Rouwenhorst
1989; Merrill, Stanton & Hak 1994; Bardgett, Wardle &
Yeates 1998). Although plant species may greatly differ in their
decomposability, these differences are unlikely to affect
decomposition at ecosystem scale, as no correlation has been
found between species decomposability and fast- and slow-
cycling ecosystems (Van der Krift et al. 2001; Manning et al.
2008). Our results provide support that plant communities
exert control on soil microbial communities and related
processes through their living roots, which modify soil
resources (moisture, inorganic N, labile C) and provide rhizo-
deposits (Personeni & Loiseau 2004; De Deyn & Van der
Putten 2005). Indeed, growth of Gram(+) bacteria and decom-
position of pre-experimental POM were reduced in the pres-
ence of living roots of slow-growing plant communities.
Effect of grazing on ecosystem carbon cycling 883
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
Although the advantage of these reductions for slow-growing
plants remain unclear, maintaining a dense root system,
slow decomposition rates and, hence, low nutrient availability
may be seen as a strategy of those plants to hamper the
ingress of fast-growing plants in undisturbed ecosystems.
Moreover, mediating soil organic matter decomposition
through the activity of living roots will have a larger
impact than the production of low-quality litter. Indeed,
as shown here, the activity of living roots controlled litter
decomposition independently of their quality (Table 1 and S2).
However, further experiments, under controlled conditions,
are necessary to directly assess effects of plant species (slow-
versus fast-growing communities) on soil community and
processes.
IMPL ICATIONS FOR PRIMARY PRODUCTION, NUTRIENT
RETENTION AND CARBON STORAGE IN GRASSLANDS
Our results indicate that grazing triggers fast carbon and
nutrient cycling by altering plant roots and their control on
microbial community and decomposition. Furthermore, they
signify that slow and fast nutrient cycling have complementary
effects on biomass production. Intensified grazing stimulates
microbial decomposition, releases the previously accumulated
nutrients and increases primary production (Table 1 and S2).
However, despite returns of urine and faecal material by
herbivores, a depletion of stored nutrient in fast-cycling
(C-releasing) grasslands will occur over time, owing to lower
nutrient retention (N leaching was doubled in LH compared
to the LL treatment) and exportation by herbivores. Conse-
quently, to maintain primary production without fertili-
zation in the long-term, a return to slow-cycling (C-storing)
ecosystem is required to build new organic reserves (Table 1
and S2). Indeed, slow-cycling grasslands have a greater reten-
tion of nutrients due to higher root biomass (Fig. 3 and
Table S2).
In order to compensate climate change and food require-
ments of a growing human population, changes in land use
towards more productive (but disturbed) systems are likely to
become more frequent in the coming decades (FAO 2008).
Our results show that more productive and disturbed grass-
land systems will foster POM decomposition and soil C loss.
This concurs with a report that, for a range of European grass-
land sites, net ecosystem carbon storage declines with increas-
ing disturbance by grazing and cutting (Soussana et al. 2007).
Provided that microbial decomposition is limited to the POM
compartment, soil C loss should be low given that POM repre-
sents a small fraction of total soil organic matter. However,
studies have shown that nutrient loss of ecosystem favours the
activity of mining microbes and accelerates the decomposition
of recalcitrant soil organic matter (Carreiro et al. 2000; Fon-
taine et al. 2004; Waldrop, Zak & Sinsabaugh 2004; Fontaine
& Barot 2005). Therefore, higher N losses of ecosystems
exposed to high disturbance may lead to a long-term soil C
loss. However, further work is needed to investigate the impact
of ecosystem disturbance on the loss of recalcitrant soil organic
carbon.
Acknowledgements
We thank Patrick Pichon (UR 874), Claire Commenaux (UMR5557),
Emanuelle Personeni, and Christiane Kramer for their technical and scientific
contributions. We also thank Juliette Bloor and Nicolas Gross, Vincent Maire
and anonymous referees for helpful comments on the manuscript. This work
was supported by aMarie Curie Individual Fellowship (EVK2-CT2002-50026)
to K.K., a PhD Scholarship (INRA – Region Poitou Charentes) to E. A., the
European FP5 ‘GREENGRASS’ project (EVK2-CT2001-00105) and the
Project ANRBIOMOS.
References
Attard, E., Degrange, V., Klumpp, K., Richaume, A., Soussana, J.F. & Le
Roux, L. (2008) How do grasslandmanagement history and bacterial micro-
localisationaffect the responseofbacterial community structure to changes in
abovegroundgrazing regime?SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,40, 1244–1252.
Bardgett, R.D. & McAlistair, E. (1999) The measurement of soil fungal:bacte-
rial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate
meadow grasslands.Biology and Fertility of Soils, 29, 282–290.
Bardgett, R.D., Wardle, D.A. & Yeates, G.W. (1998) Linking above-ground
and below-ground food webs: how plant responses to foliar herbivory influ-
ence soil organisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 1867–1878.
Bardgett, R.D., Bowman,W.D., Kaufmann, R. & Schmidt, S.K. (2005) A tem-
poral approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology.Trends in
Ecology and Evolution, 20, 634–641.
Berendse, F., Bobbink, R. & Rouwenhorst, G. (1989) A comparative study on
nutrient cycling in wet heathland ecosystems. II. Litter production and nutri-
ent mineralization.Oecologia, 78, 338–348.
Brennan, P.J. (1988) Mycobacterium and other actinomycetes. Microbial
Lipids (eds C. Ratledge & S.G. Wilkinson). pp. 203–298, Academic Press,
London.
Carreiro, M.M., Sinsabaugh, R.L., Repert, D.A. & Parkhurst, D.F. (2000)
Microbial enzyme shifts explain litter decay responses to simulated nitrogen
deposition.Ecology, 81, 2359–2365.
De Deyn, G.B., Cornelissen, J.H.C. & Bardgett, R.D. (2008) Plant functional
traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes. Ecology Letters,
11, 516–531.
De Deyn, G.B. & Van der Putten, W.H. (2005) Linking aboveground and
belowground diversity.Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 625–633.
FAO (2008) La Situation Mondiale de L’alimentation et de L’agriculture. FAO,
Rome.
Fontaine, S. & Barot, S. (2005) Size and functional diversity ofmicrobe popula-
tions control plant persistence and long-term soil carbon accumulation.
Ecology Letters, 8, 1075–1087.
Fontaine, S., Bardoux, G., Abbadie, L. & Mariotti, A. (2004) Carbon input to
soil may decrease soil carbon content.Ecology Letters, 7, 314–320.
Frostegard, A. & Baath, E. (1996) The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis
to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil.Biology and Fertility of Soils,
22, 59–65.
Guitan, R. & Bardgett, R.D. (2000) Plant and soil microbial responses to defo-
liation in temperate semi-natural grassland.Plant and Soil, 220, 271–277.
Hamilton, E.W. & Frank, D.A. (2001) Can plants stimulate soil microbes and
their own nutrient supply? Evidence from a grazing tolerant grass. Ecology,
82, 2397–2402.
Holland, E.A. & Detling, J.K. (1990) Plant response to herbivory and below-
ground nitrogen cycling.Ecology, 71, 1040–1049.
Jabaji-Hare, S. (1988) Lipid and fatty acid profiles of some vesicular– arbuscu-
larmycorrhizal fungi: contribution to taxonomy.Mycologia, 80, 622–629.
Klumpp, K. & Soussana, J.F. (2009) Using functional traits to predict grass-
land ecosystem change: a mathematical test of the reponse-and-effect trait
approach.Global Change Biology, DOI: 10.1111/j1365-2486.200901905.x
Klumpp, K., Soussana, J.F. & Falcimagne, R. (2007a) Effects of past and cur-
rent disturbance on carbon cycling in grassland mesocosms. Agriculture,
Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 59–73.
Klumpp, K., Soussana, J.F. & Falcimagne, R. (2007b) Long-term steady state13C labeling to investigate carbon turnover in plant soil systems. Biogeo-
sciences, 4, 385–394.
Kramer, C. & Gleixner, G. (2006) Variable use of plant- and soil-derived car-
bon by micro-organisms in agricultural soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,
38, 3267–3278.
Kroppenstedt, R.M., Greinermai, E. & Kornwendisch, F. (1984) Analysis
of fatty acids and other lipids of actinomycetes and coryneform bacteria.
Systematic and AppliedMicrobiology, 5, 273.
884 K. Klumpp et al.
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885
Kruskal, J.B. &Wish,M. (1978)Multidimensional Scaling. Beverley Hills, Cali-
fornia.
Lemaire, G. & Salette, J. (1983) Relation entre dynamique de croissance et
dynamique de prelevement d’azote pour un peuplement de graminees
fourrageres. I. Etude de l’effet dumilieu.Agronomie, 4, 423–430.
Loiseau, P. & Soussana, J.F. (1999) Elevated [CO2], temperature increase and
N supply effects on the turnover of below-ground carbon in a temperate
grassland ecosystem.Plant and Soil, 210, 233–247.
Louault, F., Pillar, V.D., Aufrere, J., Garnier, E. & Soussana, J.F. (2005) Plant
traits and function types in response to reduced disturbance in semi-natural
grassland. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 151–160.
Manning, P., Saunders, M., Bardgett, R.D., Bonkowski, M., Bradford, A.,
Ellis, R.J., Kandeler, E., Marhan, S. & Tscherko, D. (2008) Direct and indi-
rect effects of nitrogen deposition on litter decomposition. Soil Biology and
Biochemistry, 40, 688–698.
McNaughton, S.J., Banyikwa, F.F. & McNaughton, M.M. (1997) Promotion
of the cycling of diet-enhancing nutrients by African grazers. Science, 278,
1798–1800.
Melin, E. (1930) Biological decomposition of some types of litter from North
America forest.Ecology, 11, 72–101.
Merrill, E.H., Stanton, N.L. & Hak, J.C. (1994) Responses of bluebunch
wheatgrass, Idaho fescue and nematodes to ungulate grzing in Yellowstone
National Park.Oikos, 69, 231–240.
Milchunas, D.G. & Lauenroth, W.K. (1993) Quantitative effects of grazing on
vegetation and soils over a global range of environments.Ecological Monog-
raphes, 63, 327–366.
Olsson, P.A. (1999) Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the
distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Microbiol-
ogy Ecology, 29, 303–310.
Parton, W., Silver, W., Burke, I., Grassens, L., Harmon, M.E., Currie, W.S.,
King, J.Y., Adair, E.C., Brandt, L.A., Hart, S.C. & Fasth, B. (2007) Global-
scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposi-
tion. Science, 315, 361–364.
Patra, A.K., Abbadie, L., Clays, A., Degrange, V., Grayston, S., Loiseau, P.
et al. (2005) Effect of grazing on microbial functional groups involved in soil
N dynamics.EcologicalMonographs, 75, 65–80.
Patra, A.K., Abbadie, L., Clays, A., Degrange, V., Grayston, S., Guillaumaud,
N. et al. (2006) Effects of management regime and plant species on the
enzyme activity and genetic structure of N-fixing, denitrifying and nitrifying
bacterial communities in grassland soils. Environmental Microbiology, 8,
1005–1016.
Personeni, E.&Loiseau, P. (2004)How does the nature of living and dead roots
affect the residence time of carbon in the root litter continuum? Plant and
Soil, 267, 129–141.
Pickett, S.T.A. & White, P.S. (1986) The Ecology of National Disturbance and
Patch Dynamics. Academics Press. Inc., London 472 p.
Ranjard, L., Nazaret, S., Gourbiere, F., Thioulouse, J., Linet, P. & Richaume,
A. (2000)A soil microscale study to reveal the heterogeneity ofHg(II) impact
on indigenous bacteria by quantification of adapted phenotypes and analysis
of community DNA fingerprints. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 31, 107–
115.
Ratledge, C. &Wilkinson, S.G. (1988)Microbial Lipids. Academic Press, Lon-
don.
Seastedt, T.R. (1985) Maximisation of primary and secondary productivity by
grazers.AmericanNaturalist, 126, 559–564.
Soussana, J.F., Allard, V., Pilegaard, K., Ambus, P., Amman, C., Campbell, C.
et al. (2007) Full accounting of the greenhouse gas (CO2, N2O, CH4) budget
of nine European grassland sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems &Environment,
121, 121–135.
Swift, M.J., Heal, O.W. & Anderson, J.M. (1979) Decomposition in Terrestrial
Ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford.
Van der Krift, T.A.J., Kuikman, P.J. & Berendse, F. (2002) The effect of living
plants on root decomposition of four grass species.Oikos, 96, 36–45.
Van der Krift, T.A.J., Gioacchini, P., Kuikman, P.J. & Berendse, F. (2001)
Effects of high and low fertility plant species on dead root decomposition
and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 2115–
2124.
Waksman, S.A. & Tenney, F.G. (1927) Composition of natural organic materi-
als and their decomposition in the soil: II. Influence of age of plant upon the
rapidity and nature of its decomposition-rye plants. Soil Science, 24, 317–
334.
Waldrop, M.P., Zak, D.R. & Sinsabaugh, R.L. (2004) Microbial community
response to nitrogen deposition in northern forest ecosystems. Soil Biology
and Biochemistry, 36, 1443–1451.
Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Klironomos, J.N., Setala, H., Van der Putten,
W.H. & Wall, D.H. (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and
belowground biota. Science, 304, 1629–1633.
Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Walker, L.R., Peltzer, D.A. & Lagerstrom,
A. (2008) The response of plant diversity to ecosystem retrogression:
evidence from contrasting long-term chronosequences. Oikos, 117, 93–
103.
Zelles, L. (1999) Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides
in the characterisation of microbial communities in soil: a review. Biology &
Fertility of Soils, 29, 111–129.
Received 10May 2009; accepted 25 June 2009
Handling Editor: Richard Bardgett
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online ver-
sion of this article:
Appendix S1.Timescale of applied methods.
Table S1. Mean N content and C ⁄N of roots and rhizomes, coarse
and fine particulate organic matter in the 0–10 cm soil layer.
Table S2. Amount of N release in the HL treatment and sequestrated
in the LH treatment from root and POM pools in the top 30 cm,
18 months after disturbance change.
Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or
functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors.
Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the
corresponding author for the article.
Effect of grazing on ecosystem carbon cycling 885
� 2009 The Authors. Journal compilation � 2009 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 97, 876–885