District Level Project Implementation Unit
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of District Level Project Implementation Unit
Government of Nepal
National Reconstruction Authority
Central Level Project Implementation Unit
District Level Project Implementation Unit Grant Management and Local Infrastructure
Chautara, Sindhupalchok
EARTHQUAKE HOUSING RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT (EHRP)
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (ESMP) Sub Project Name: Bajre Tole Landslide Protection
Sub Project Location: Banskharka-1, Panch Pokhari Thangpal
Rural Municipality
Fiscal Year: 2075/076
2
Salient Features of Sub Project SN Particulars Description
1 Name of Project Bajre Tole Landslide Protection
2 Type of Project Slope Protection
3 Location Banskharka-1, Panch Pokhari Thangpal Rural Municipality
4 District Sindhupalchok
5 Nos. of Earthquake Beneficiary 40
6 Total Benefitted HHs by Project 10
7 Is there Geo-technical recommendation
No
8 Total Dimension of Landslide Length: 17 m & Breadth: 12 m
9 Major Works Installation of stone filled gabion retaining wall
10 Types of Structures Gabion wall
11 Total Protected Area 863 m2
12 Total Estimated Cost (NRs.) 140397
Project Contribution (NRs.) 127700
User Contribution (NRs.) 12697
13 Per Capita Cost (NRs.) 3510
14 Rationality of Site Selection Landslide due to stone quarrying
15 How does the Proposed Project Fulfill the Provision of EHRP-ESMF
The landslide might be triggered due to removal of materials from its lower parts by human activities such i.e. quarrying
16 ESSR Approved Not Applicable
17 ESMP Prepared Yes
18 Earthquake and Safeguard Perspective of the Proposal
The landslide of Bajre might be triggered due to destabilization of the slope
due to removal of materials from its lower parts by human activities such
as quarrying for reconstruction and exaggerate due to earthquake shaking
according to the local residents.
3
Abbreviations and Acronyms CBS Central Bureau of Statistic
CLPIU Central Level Project Implementation Unit
DLPIU District Level Project Implementation Unit
EHRP Earthquake Housing Reconstruction Project
ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework
ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan
GMaLI Grant Management and Local Infrastructure
GoN Government of Nepal
GPS Global Positioning System
MIS Management Information System
NRA National Reconstruction Authority
PDNA Post Disaster Needs Assessment
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride
RM Rural Municipality
UC User Committee
VDC Village Development Committee
Units and Symbols amsl Above Mean Sea Level
◦C Degree Celsius
Km Kilometer
LS Lump sum
Lit. Liter
m. Meter
m3 Cubic Meter
Nos. Number
4
Table of Contents
CONTENTS
Salient Features of Sub Project .............................................................. 2
Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................. 3
Units and Symbols ............................................................................. 3
Table of Contents .............................................................................. 4
Lists of Figures ................................................................................. 4
Lists of Tables .................................................................................. 4
1. Introduction ................................................................................. 5
2. Objectives of ESMP ......................................................................... 6
3. Description of Sub-Project ................................................................ 6
3.1 Site Description ......................................................................... 6
3.2 Environmental and Social Issues ...................................................... 7
3.3 Rationale of Sub-Project .............................................................. 7
4. Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) .................................. 7
5. ESMP Estimated Cost/Budget ............................................................. 9
6. Occupational Health and Safety .......................................................... 9
7. Implementation and Monitoring of ESMP ................................................ 9
8. Expected Outcomes ...................................................................... 11
9. Conclusions ................................................................................ 11
10. References ............................................................................... 11
Annexes ......................................................................................... i
Photographs .................................................................................... x
Lists of Figures Figure 1: Sub Project Location ............................................................... 6
Figure 2: Environmental and Social Monitoring Mechanism............................ 10
Lists of Tables Table 1: Environmental and Social Management Plan .................................... 8
Table 2: ESMP Budget ......................................................................... 9
Table 3: Safeguard Work Implementation Plan ......................................... 10
5
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
On Saturday, 25 April 2015, a 7.6 magnitude earthquake (Nepal’s National
Seismological Centre), struck Barpak, Gorkha, about 76 km northwest of Kathmandu.
Ever since the first recorded earthquake of 1255 AD that killed one-third of the
population of the Kathmandu Valley and its King, Abhaya Malla, Nepal has
experienced a major earthquake every few generations (PDNA, 2015). The last great
earthquake (of magnitude 8.4) in 1934 AD resulted in more than 10,000 deaths in
the Kathmandu Valley.
After the Nepal Earthquake of April 2015 and subsequent aftershocks including of
May 2015, had left wide spread damaged residential houses, heritage sites, water
supply system, government building, schools, rural road, hospitals, health posts,
agricultural land, trekking routes, hydropower plants etc. To date, there are over
8,790 casualties and 22,300 injuries (PDNA, 2015). It is estimated that the lives of
eight million people, almost one-third of the population of Nepal, have been
impacted by these earthquakes. The disaster also emphasized aspects of inequities
in Nepali society across geography, income and gender. Poorer rural areas have been
more adversely affected than towns and cities due to their inferior quality of houses.
More women and girls died than men and boys, partly because of gendered roles
that disproportionately assign indoor chores to women (PDNA, 2015).
Thirty-two of the country’s 77 districts have been affected, out of which 14 district
were severely affected while 18 district were partially affected. Sindhupalchok
district was identified by the Government of Nepal (GoN) as one of the most severely
affected districts by the earthquake with around 3,500 deaths which is the highest
total number of casualties in a district i.e. around 40 per cent of the total in Nepal
and 1,569 cases of injury (District Disaster Relief Committee, Sindhupalchok).
Similarly, the damage to infrastructure was quite severe with destruction individual
houses. Many health posts and schools, public infrastructures, security posts,
trekking routes, hydropower plants etc. were also severely affected and many of
those were completely destroyed. Of the estimated 288,000 people in the district,
99 per cent were affected by the earthquake (Nepal Earthquake, 2015).
6
2. Objectives of ESMP The objective of the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) are:
To identify and address the site-specific environmental and social issues of
earthquake housing reconstruction project.
To recommend measures for minimization and mitigation of adverse impacts.
3. Description of Sub-Project
3.1 Site Description
Location and Terrain
The sub project (geographic
location: 27◦ 54.576′ N and 085◦
36.500′), is located at Banskharka of
Panch Pokhari Thangpal Rural
Municipality, Ward Number 1 at an
elevation of 1650 amsl. It is 86 km
from Kathmandu, Federal capital
city of Nepal.
In Ward No. 1 of Panch Pokhari
Thangpal Rural Municipality, former
Banskharka VDC, the total housing
reconstruction beneficiaries are 905
of which 879, 768 and 489 have
already received 1st tranche, 2nd
tranche and 3rd tranche respectively as
of 2019/01/07 EHRP-MIS data.
Climate
The sub project site is in Indian monsoon region and climate can be divided into
three distinct season’s viz. winter from November-March, summer from April-May
and rainy from May-October with mean annual temperature of 18°C, with maximum
temperature of 32.5°C and minimum of 5°C and annual rainfall of 1615 mm. The
sub-tropical forest species vegetation including Simal (Bombax ceiba), Uttis (Alnus
nepalensis), Chilaune (Schima wallichii) etc. are found in the sub project site.
Figure 1: Sub Project Location
Bajre Tole Landslide
Protection Sub Project
Site
7
Human Population and Occupation
The total population of Ward number 1, Banskharka was 2259 (Male: 1170 Female:
1089) and the total households was 588 according to CBS, 2011. Agriculture is the
major sources of income of the people. Maize, millet etc. are the major crops grown
and Tamang is the major ethnic group of Bajre Tole.
3.2 Environmental and Social Issues
Panch Pokhari Thangpal being hilly rural municipality, most of the issues are related
to the slope instability and landslides. The effect of landslide of Barje Tole was
individual site basis rather than local or large regional basis.10 households were
prone to the landslide and if proper slope mitigation measure is not applied, it may
result in partial damage to complete destruction of beneficiary houses (both
completed and under construction) and loss of agricultural land directly on or near
to the landslide though the effect of landslide on natural environment i.e. forest,
grassland and wildlife is insignificant.
3.3 Rationale of Sub-Project
The landslide (translational slide) of Barje Tole might be triggered due to
destabilization of the slope due to removal of materials from its lower parts by
human activities such as stone quarrying for reconstruction and exaggerate due to
earthquake shaking according to the local residents. After environmental and social
verification/validation, the issue i.e. translational slide, was found to be project
induced.
4. Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) To identify and assess physical, biological, socio-economic and cultural issues and to
recommend measures for avoidance, minimization and mitigation of adverse impacts
due to Earthquake Housing Reconstruction Project (EHRP), one day orientation and
consultation program was held at office of rural municipal executive of Panch
Pokhari Thangpal Rural Municipality comprising rural municipality chairperson, vice
chairperson, ward chairperson, chief executive officer, members of rural municipal
executive, ward members and representatives from different line agencies. During
8
the program, the ward chairperson of Banskharka raised the issue of slope
instability/landslide at Barje Tole.
The ESMP includes cost effective mitigation measure for of slope
instability/landslide i.e. implementation of rock/stone filled gabion retaining wall
for slope protection measure, which was raised during orientation and consultation
meeting and verified/validated during field visit.
During the preparation of ESMP, various documents such as district profile, former
VDC profile, CBS publication and publication of line agencies at district level and
other project related reports were reviewed. Likewise, Google Earth map was also
used as references for the overview of the sub project area. GPS (Garmin) was used
to determine location of sub project. Similarly, field verification/validation,
measurements and consultation with ward chairperson, ward secretary,
beneficiaries and locals were also carried out. Further, consultations and discussions
with and among EHRP consultants was also conducted.
Table 1: Environmental and Social Management Plan
Envir
onm
enta
l
Impact/
Asp
ects
Lik
ely
Pote
nti
al
Impact
Locati
on
Mit
igati
on
Measu
res
Mit
igati
on C
ost
Benefi
cia
ries
Tim
e
of
acti
on
Resp
onsi
bilit
y
Slope instability i.e. landslide
Partial damage to complete destruction of beneficiary houses
Barje Tole, Banskharka
Rock/stone filled gabion retaining wall
NRs. 140396
10 HHs Chaitra-Jestha, 2075/76
UC's, RM, DL-PIU, GMaLI
The final ESMP document will be shared and implemented in the consultation and
coordination with rural municipality, ward of rural municipality, CL-PIU, DL-PIU,
GMaLI and other related government and non-governmental line agencies.
9
5. ESMP Estimated Cost/Budget The ESMP identified implementation of rock/stone filled gabion retaining wall as a
cost effective slope protection measure since gabions are cost effective due to their
flexibility and can withstand foundation movement and because of their coarse fill,
they are very permeable and thus provide excellent drainage (The Landslide
Handbook, 2008). The detail ESMP cost/budget is Table 2.
Table 2: ESMP Budget
Sn. Description of work Amount Remarks
1. Excavation of soil for slope cutting along with foundation for plastic water tank and disposal of excavated materials
7918
2. Supplying, assembling and placing mechanically woven double twisted heavy zinc coated gabion boxes
47197
3. Packing and filling of gabion creates with rubble stone including supplying hard block and bond
71852
4. Total Amount 126968
5. User’s Committee Contribution Amount 12696
6. DL-PIU, GMaLI Contribution Amount 127700
7. GRAND TOTAL 140396
6. Occupational Health and Safety The implementation of mitigation measure involves small-scale civil works, which
may give rise to health and safety risks of minor accidents and injuries. The members
of User’s Committee (UC) will be made aware of safety risks and how to manage
these risks. Similarly, personal protection equipment’s (PPEs) will be provided to
the labors.
7. Implementation and Monitoring of ESMP The implementation of mitigation measure will be carried out through User’s
Committee (UC). Formation, mobilization and management of the UC will be as per
the prevailing rules and regulations. The work implementation plan is presented in
Table no. 3
10
Table 3: Safeguard Work Implementation Plan
Activity/Months Month
Falgun Chaitra Baisakh Jestha Ashar
ESMP Preparation and
Approval from DL-PIU, GMaLI
User Committee Formation
and Agreement
Implementation of Work
Monitoring and Evaluation
Work Completion
The monitoring mechanism will be as per the revised Environmental and Social
Management Framework (ESMF). However, the District Environment and Social
Safeguard Unit will develop its field monitoring plan and will monitor the compliance
of the ESMP and progress of sub project activities accordingly and submit monitoring
report.
The proposed organogram for the implementation and monitoring of ESMP is
presented in figure 2.
NRA World Bank
CLPIU/GMaLI
Environment & Social Safeguard Unit (Environment and Social Development Specialist)
DL-PIU (GMaLI)
Environment Specialist
Social Development Specialist
Rural Municipality
Rural Municipal Ward Office
User’s Committee
Monitoring Committee
Monitoring of Slope Protection Work at Bajre Tole, Banskharka-1, Panch Pokhari Thangpal RM
Figure 2: Environmental and Social Monitoring Mechanism
11
8. Expected Outcomes The expected outcomes of ESMP implementation are as follows:
Mitigation of adverse impacts such as partial damage to complete destruction of
beneficiary houses i.e. both completed and under construction and loss of
agricultural land due EHRP.
9. Conclusions During one day orientation and consultation program held at office of rural municipal
executive of Panch Pokhari Thangpal Rural Municipality, the ward chairperson of
Banskharka raised the issue of slope instability/landslide at Barje Tole. After
environmental and social verification, the issue was partially found to be project
induced. The effect of landslide of Barje Tole was individual site specific rather than
local or large regional.
Reviewing various documents, field verification/validation, measurements and
consultations with different stakeholders, site specific ESMP was prepared which
identified implementation of rock/stone filled gabion retaining wall as a cost
effective slope protection measure. After the implementation of ESMP, it is
expected to mitigate adverse impact due EHRP at Barje Tole.
10. References The landslide handbook—A guide to understanding landslides, U.S. Geological
Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008
National Population and Housing Census, Central Bureau of Statistics, 2011
Post Disaster Needs Assessment, National Planning Commission, Government of
Nepal, 2015
Sindhupalchok District Profile, Central Bureau of Statistics, 2018
Environmental and Social Management Framework, Government of Nepal, 2018
ix
Annex V: Beneficiaries Details
Sn. Name of Sub Project Beneficiaries
Gender Ethnicity Address Remarks
1 Dharma Grangden
Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-1 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
2 Manish Grangden
Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-2 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
3 Shyriya Glan Female Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-3 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
4 Purna Bdr. Grangden Tamang
Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-4 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
5 Seti Maya Tamangani
Female Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-5 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
6 Sosman Grangden Tamang
Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-6 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
7 Babu Tamang Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-7 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
8 Furba Grangden
Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-8 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
9 Lakpa Lamsa Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-9 Reconstruction
Beneficiary
10 Sete Lama Grangden
Male Janajati Bajre Tole,
Banskharka-10 Reconstruction
Beneficiary