CRA LTD - FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM - Records ...

18

FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAMWatson Street and Plant SiteSt. Louis, Michigan

prepared for:Bidley & AuatinOctober S1BB&

FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAMWatson Street and Plant SiteSt. Louie, Michigan

prepared for:Sidley S. AuetlnOctober ,1988

Ref. No. 1113 CONESTOGA-ROVERS 4 ASSOCIATES LIMITED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL

1.2 PRESEARCH INC.

1.3 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER PRIVATE LANDS

2.0 FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM 4

2.1 PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS 42.1.1 June 1982 Investigation 42.1.2 July 21, 1982 Investigation 6

2.2 SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 INVESTIGATION 82.2.1 Purpose 82.2.2 Equipment 82.2.3 Sampling Stations 92.2.4 Collection of Petroleum Based Liquid 9

Samples2.2.5 Total Oil Observer 112.2.6 Laboratory Analysis 122.2.7 Analytical Results 12

2.3 SEPTEMBER 15 TO OCTOBER 21, 1982 13INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM2.3.1 Purpose 132.3.2 Equipment 142.3.3 Augering Stations 142.3.4 Excavation of Test Pits 152.3.5 Sampling Stations 172.3.6 Field Observations 172.3.7 Defined Areas of Contamination 222.3.8 Groundwater 2 42.3.9 Laboratory Analysis 282.3.10 Analytical Results 282.3.11 Restoration of Private Lands 29

3.0 EXISTING PIPELINES 31

3.1 TOTAL OIL OBSERVER 38

3.2 TOTAL OIL PIPELINE TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS 38

3.3 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG 41

4,0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 60

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D

APPENDIX E

APPENDIX F

APPENDIX G

APPENDIX H

APPENDIX I

APPENDIX J

APPENDIX K

APPENDIX L

AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER PRIVATE LANDS

"EXPLORATORY SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION- PLANT SITE - ST. LOUIS, MICHIGAN"FIGURES, BOREHOLE LOGS AND LABORATORYANALYSIS

"FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM- WATSON STREET - ST. LOUIS, MICHIGAN"FIGURES, BOREHOLE LOGS AND LABORATORYANALYSIS

ANALYTICAL G.C./M.S. DATA FORSEPTEMBER 8, 1982 PROGRAM

GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANYCORRESPONDENCE REGARDING G.C./M.S.ANALYTICAL DATA

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIESDATA

TOTAL PETROLEUM INC. ANALYTICAL DATAAND REVIEW CORRESPONDENCE OF ANALYTICALRESULTS BY GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

BOREHOLE LOGS - SEPTEMBER 19, 1982AUGERING PROGRAM

OBSERVATION WELL - BOREHOLE LOGS

ANALYTICAL G.C./M.S. DATA FORSEPTEMBER 21, 1982 SAMPLING PROGRAM

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES DATASEPTEMBER 21, 1982 SAMPLING PROGRAM

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES DATAOCTOBER, 1982 - SOIL/LIQUID SAMPLES

I

LIST OF TABLES

Page

f TABLE I GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS - PLANT SITE 27

TABLE II SAMPLING DATA 40

ILIST OF FIGURES

I FIGURE 1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 PROGRAM

I10

FIGURE 2 AUGER HOLE LOCATIONS 16

FIGURE 3 TEST PIT AND TRENCH LOCATIONS FORVISUAL CHARACTERIZATION 18

FIGURE 4 SAMPLING LOCATIONS - SEPTEMBER 8 & 21, 1982 19PROGRAM

1 FIGURE 5 ESTIMATED EXTENT OF SUBSURFACE PETROLEUM 231 BASED CONTAMINATION

1 ^ FIGURE 6 GROUNDWATER CONTOURS, OCTOBER 1982 26

FIGURE 7 LOCATION OF EXISTING PIPELINE FACILITIES 35

I FIGURE 8 CROSS-SECTION A-A, EXISTING PIPELINE 36FACILITIES

] FIGURE 9 SAMPLING LOCATIONS - SEPTEMBER AND 371 OCTOBER, 1982 PROGRAM

( FIGURE 10 PIPELINE LOCATION - NORTHWEST CORNER 39OF PLANT SITE

LIST OF PLATES

PLATE I

PLATE II

PLATE III

PLATE IV

PLATE V

PLATE VI

PLATE VII

PLATE VIII

PLATE IX

PLATE X

PLATE XI

PLATE XII

PLATE XIII

PLATE XIV

PLATE XV

PLATE XVI

PLATE XVII

UGW-16-2

UGW-16 AT FENCE LINE

982-21-1 UGW-16 AT FENCE LINE

982-21-6 75 FEET SOUTH OF UGW-16

982-21-5 38 FEET SOUTH OF UGW-16

982-21-2 38 FEET NORTH OF UGW-16

UGW-16 AT FENCE LINE

982-21-6 LOOKING NORTH

TRENCH WEST OF STATION 6+35 ALONG PIPELINE

END OF OLD 6"0 PIPE AT STATION 6+35

DEPTH OF OLD 6"0 PIPE at STATION 6+35

90° BEND AT STATION 6+35

PIPE LINER BENEATH RAILROAD TRACKS WESTOF STATION 6+35

NEW AND OLD 6"0 PIPELINES WEST OFSTATION 6+35

OLD AND NEW PIPELINES WEST OF STATION 6+35

END OF OLD PIPELINE WEST OF STATION 6+35(WEST END)

90° BEND TO NORTH WEST OF STATION 6+35(NOTE CATHODIC PROTECTION)

PLATE XVIII SAMPLING 4"0 PIPELINE ADJACENT TO UGW-17

Page

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 GENERAL

During collection of soil samples

in May 1982 along the line of the proposed upgradient

containment wall, a petroleum based liquid was

identified in several boreholes on Velsicol's St. Louis

Plant Site property west of the easterly plant boundary

fence line and north of Highway M-46. Subsequent

preliminary field investigative work completed in late

June 1982, defined the approximate horizontal and

vertical extent of the petroleum based liquid beneath

the Velsicol Plant Site. Details and conclusions of

this preliminary investigative program are contained

within the report entitled "Exploratory Subsurface

Investigation - Plant Site, St. Louis, Michigan".

This report was submitted to Sidley & Austin on July 6,

1982.

On July 15, 1982, Conestoga-Rovers

& Associates Limited (CRA) was directed to proceed with

a further preliminary field and laboratory

investigative program which would define the extent of

petroleum based liquid contamination beneath private

lands east of the easterly plant boundary fence line

and north of Highway M-46. Details and conclusions of

[I this preliminary investigative program are contained

( within the report entitled "Field Investigative

* Program, Watson Street, St. Louis, Michigan". This

I report was submitted to Sidley & Austin on July 25,

1982.i* A third investigative program was

( authorized on September 2, 1982. The intent of this- •program initially, was to more accurately define the

I extent of the petroleum based liquid contamination

I beneath private lands east of the easterly plant

" boundary fence line and north of Highway M-46, and to

1 sample and chemically characterize the liquid

contaminant. The program was subsequently expanded on

I September 10, 1982 to include redefinition of petroleum

. based contaminated areas west of the easterly plant

boundary fence line between the easterly plant boundary

I fence line and the Pine River north of Highway M-46 and

sampling and chemical characterizations of the observed

I contaminant. This report presents the details and

field and laboratory observations of this investigatory

program.

iI

I 1.2 PRESEARCH INC.

I On August 31, 1982, Presearch

Inc., was retained by Velsicol to provide expert

I testimony and to assist in the identification

I of the source and type of contaminant encountered.

II Mr. J. Leslie Goodier, P.E., of

Presearch Inc. was present at the Plant Site and

• ~ observed the field investigative and sampling

1described hereafter.

procedures undertaken during the investigative program

i1.3 AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER PRIVATE LANDS

iOn September 3 and again on

j ^ September 13, 1982, CRA personnel met with the three

homeowners whose lands were anticipated to be affected

' by petroleum based contaminants. Each homeowner was

I requested to sign an authorization that allowed entry

of personnel and equipment onto the lands in question.

j Copies of the signed authorizations are contained

within Appendix A. A condition of authorization to

• enter was that all vegetation and lands damaged by

I equipment or vehicles would be restored to no worse

than pre-existing conditions at Velsicol's expense.i

II 2»° FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM

I 2'1 PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS

2.1.1 June 1982 Investigation

iThe preliminary field

J investigative program completed in late June

. 1982, confirmed the presence and identified the

* extent of petroleum based contaminants beneath

I Velsicol land, and lands adjacent to the

easterly plant boundary fence line and north of

J Highway M-46. Two areas of contamination were

- identified; an area within which the soil

• contained free petroleum based liquid, and an

1 area within which soil contamination by

petroleum based material was determined by odor

| ^ The horizontal extent of these two zones, as

. inferred from the field investigation and the

* supporting borehole logs, are presented in

j Appendix B. In all cases the presence of a

petroleum based contaminant was limited to the

I upper five to six feet of soil. The vertical

migration of the oily material was apparently

• restricted by an underlying dense clay till

I strata. Preliminary laboratory analysis of

collected samples tentatively identified theii

« contaminant to be a No. 6 or lighter fuel oil,

on the basis of BTU value, color, viscosity and

] sulphur content.

I On July 12, 1982, as part of this

I initial field investigative program, Mr. N.

LaPaugh and Mr. B. White of Total Oil were

) present at the Plant Site to witness the

excavation of a test pit on Velsicol property.

* The pit was allowed to sit open overnight and an

1 oily liquid sample was collected by Total Oil on

the morning of July 13, 1982. This sample was

I split with CRA.

During this period, a program was

also underway to excavate a continuous trench

adjacent to the line of the proposed upgradient

I ^ containment wall in order to identify and remove

all subsurface utilities or services which

* entered the Velsicol property. On July 13, this

\ trenching program had reached the general area

of the test pit. While the test pit was being

1 sampled by Total Oil and CRA personnel, the

backhoe involved in the trenching operation

* encountered an isolated section of four inch

I diameter pipeline. This section of pipeline was

approximately 30 feet long, cut but uncapped at

j both ends, and completely full of a black

odorless oily liquid. A sample was collected

from the pipeline and split with Total Oil.

Preliminary laboratory analysis of

both the test pit and the pipeline samples

tentatively identified the liquid in each case

to be No. 6 fuel oil on the basis of BTU value,

color, viscosity and sulphur content.

Laboratory results of samples taken during the

June 1982 investigation are presented within

Appendix B.

The 4" diameter pipeline was again

sampled on October 19, 1982 and analyzed by

Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory. Analysis

confirmed that the material within the pipeline

was a No. 6 oil. Analytical data is contained

within Appendix L.

I 2.1.2 July 21, 1982 Investigation

* The purpose of the July 21, 1982

I investigation was to identify by field drilling,

the horizontal and vertical limits of soils

I contaminated by petroleum based material beneath

• private lands, east of the easterly plant

i

- boundary fence line and north of Highway M-46.

In addition, preliminary laboratory analysis of

1 selected liquid samples collected east of the

plant boundary fence line was performed to

I confirm that the contaminant was similar to that

. previously encountered west of the boundary

* fence line.iOn the basis of the June, 1982

fI ^- investigative program, an initial 150 foot by 50

I foot sampling grid was established east of the

proposed upgradient containment wall line.

I Additional intermediate sampling stations were

established in the field, where required, to

I delineate the contaminated and uncontaminated

• zones. The horizontal extent of the oily

contamination in the backyards of the Watson

I ^ Street homes, as identified by this field

investigation and the supporting borehole logs

I are contained within Appendix C.

An open pit approximately 3' x 31

J was dug by backhoe, ten (10) feet east of the

plant boundary fence line adjacent to UGW-16, on

] July 21, 1982 and allowed to sit overnight. A

* petroleum based liquid sample was collected from

this pit on the morning of July 22, 1982 and

r forwarded to the laboratory for preliminary

characterization. Laboratory analysis suggested

I that the contaminant was a product similar to

kerosene. Laboratory results are contained

I within Appendix C.

i 2.2 SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 INVESTIGATION

I s " " 2.2.1 Purpose

The purpose of the Sept. 8, 1982 investigation

I was to confirm the horizontal and vertical limits

of petroleum based contaminants north of Highway

I M-46 beneath private lands east of the easterly

i plant boundary fence line and beneath Velsicol

lands immediately west of the plant easterly

I ^ boundary fence line, and to sample and chemically

characterize the encountered petroleum based

* contaminants.

i2.2.2 Equipmenti

A tractor-backhoe was utilized toiI excavate test pits on private lands east of the

| plant's easterly boundary and also on the Plant

Site, within the southeast sector.ii

2.2.3 Sampling Stations

Four sampling pits were excavated

on the Plant Site and three sampling pits were

excavated on private lands east of the easterly

plant boundary fence line. Figure 1 details the

location of sampling stations established for

this investigative program.

2.2.4 Collection of Petroleum Based Liquid Samples

Open pits approximately 61 x 61

were dug by backhoe on the morning of

September 7, 1982. The vertical limit of

excavation was defined by the top of the clay

till. The excavated test pits were allowed to

sit over-night and the samples were collected the

following day.

New disposable vinyl gloves were

worn by the sampler at each location.

Samples were collected by skimming

surficial oily contaminants from the surface of

the groundwater with a large spoon.

-6"fJ TOTAL OIL PIPELINE(YELLOW JACKET COATING)

6' 0 UNCOATED PIPELINE

S82-5-I a, D,

9826-to

I *982-2

*\*98Z-3 n

figure ISAMPLING LOCATIONS

SEPTEMBER 8 ,1982 PROGRAMSt. Louis Plant Site

1119 • I/II/II

I1 All tools utilized in the sampling

of the oily contaminants received an

I acetone-hexane-acetone-distilled water wash after

. each sample was collected.

f All sample bottles were washed

using an acetone-hexane-acetone-distilled water

I wash sequence and were subsequently oven dried at

I a minimum temperature of 200*F for 30 minutes

prior to being used. Aluminum foil was placed

] between the neck of the jar and the standard cap.

Samples were shipped to the analyzing laboratory

I by commercial courier under chain of custody

. protocol on the same day as collection.

i2-2.5 Total Oil Observeri -

Mr. Pat Lincoln of Total Oil was

" present on-site on September 8, 1982 and observed

! all investigative proceedings on that day.

J On the basis of verbal

_ authorization received from Mr. J.G. Archer, Esq.

* of Sidley & Austin, CRA provided Mr. Lincoln with

! a split from samples UGW16-1, UGW16-2, UGW16-3

and 982-5-1.

11

II 2.2.6 Laboratory Analysis

I Collected samples were split 3 ways,

- The first set was forwarded to Environmental

- Research Group (ERG) laboratories by CRA for gas

I chromatograph/mass spectrometer analys is. The

second set was retained by Presearch Inc. for

J subsequent analysis by Rocky Mountain Analytical

- Laboratories (RMAL). The third set was retained

by Mr. Pat Lincoln of Total Oil for subsequent

i analysis at Total Oil facilities.

J In addition, GC/MS analytical data

- was reviewed by Gulf Research & Development

* Company.

I] ^ 2.2.7 Analytical Results

* GC/MS analytical data is presented

1 in Appendix D. ERG opined that the petroleum

based contaminant was similar to a No. 2 diesel

I fuel.

• On the basis of a review of the

1 GC/MS data, Gulf Research & Development Company

opined that the data indicated the contaminant wasii

I( a No. 2 fuel oil (diesel fuel and No. 2 fuel oil

are commonly used interchangeably).

| Correspondence from Gulf Research & Development

I Company is contained within Appendix E.

f Analytical data from RMAL is

contained within Appendix F. Chromatographic

I comparision indicated that all samples except

• sample no. 9982 originated from the same source

and that sample no. 982-b-1a was collected from

I an area near the contaminant source. Boiling

ranges of the four related samples corresponded

J to diesel oils and kerosenes.

IAnalytical results provided by

J Total Oil for samples split with and analysed by

Total Oil are contained within Appendix G. Gulf

J ^ Research & Development Company's evaluation of

. this analytical data is also contained within

Appendix G.

2.3 SEPTEMBER 15 TO OCTOBER 21, 1982 INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM

2.3.1 Purpose

The purpose of the September 15 to

October 21 1982 investigative program was to

13

II redefine areas of petroleum based contamination

north of Highway M-46, from east of the easterly

I plant boundary fence line to the Pine River.

f Encountered contaminants would be sampled and

* chemically characterized.

iI 2.3.2 Equipment

" A CME 75 truck mounted drill rig

1 equipped with solid stem augers was used to

advance borings into the area of suspected

J contamination.

I• A Case 580 B tractor backhoe was

I used to excavate test pits.

i -I 2.3.3 Augering Stations11 A 20' x 20' grid was established

east of the easterly plant boundary fence line

I referenced to the previous UGW series of

. sampling stations initially located for the

upgradient containment wall sampling program. A

I 50' x SO1 grid was established west of the

ii 14

I easterly plant boundary fence line also

referenced to the previous upgradient wall

( sampling holes.

The horizontal limits of the

I petroleum based contaminant was defined by

augering along these grids until "clean" and

I "dirty" samples were extracted in close

• proximity. The horizontal extent of petroleum

based contamination was assumed to lie midway

I between a "clean" and "dirty" hole. Figure 2

details the location of auger hole stations.i* 2.3.4 Excavation of Test Pitsi

During the course of the drilling

1 ^" and analytical program it became evident that

i three distinct areas of soil contamination were

present. A program to accurately delineate the

1 three distinct areas of contamination by

excavation and observation of test pits and

{ trenches was performed between October 13 and

. October 21, 1982.

iii

UGW-15 SAMPLING STATIONSUPGRADIENT CONTAINMENT WALL

10 AUGER STATIONS (SEPT. 1982) /

53 It 31

6"0 TOTflL OIL PIPELINE(VELLOW JACKET COATINC

WASHINGTON AVE.

figure 2AUGER HOLE LOCATIONS

II The locations of the test pits and

trenches are detailed on Figure 3.i• 2.3.5 Sampling Stations

iThree sample pits, approximately

J • 6'x4' were excavated and sampled on September 21

• adjacent to the easterly plant boundary fence

line. Sampling protocol was identical to that

I described in Section 2.2.4. The location of the

sample pits is detailed on Figure 4.i• Soil samples were collected from

three sample pits excavated in the southwesterly

I portion of the Plant Site within areas exhibiting

non liquid, black, petroleum based contamination.

I ^ These sampling locations are also indicated on

. Figure 4.ii

2.3.6 Field Observationsii 2.3.6.1 Soil Horizon

I Borelogs for each augering station

are contained within Appendix H.ii 17

LEGENDft TEST PIT

TRENCH

_F_IEI.D__06SeRVATION_

A — BROWN LIQUID-DIESEL FUEL OOOR

0 — BROWN -BLACK LIQUID- DIESEL FUEL ODOR

C — NONLIQUID, BLACK, LITTLE OR NO ODOR

D — BROWN - BLACK LIQUID - DIESEL FUEL ODOR

E — NONLIQUID , BLACK , LITTLE OR NO ODOR

F —BROWN LIQUID- DIESEL FUEL OOOR

6 —NONLIQUID, BLACK, LITTLE OR NO ODOR

H —NONLIQUID, BLACK, LITTLE OR NO ODOR

I — NO APPARENT CONTAMINATION

J —BROWN LIQUID- STRONG DIESEL FUEL ODOR,

K —— NO APPARENT CONTAMINATION / /

L —— TANK BOTTOM

M — 6ROWN LIQUID- DIESEL FUEL ODOR

N —BROWN LIQUID-DIESEL FUEL ODOR ^

P —BROWN LIQUID - STRONG DIESEL'fuEL ODOR

Q —BROWN LIQUID-DIESEL FUEL ODOR

R—NO APPARENT CONTAMINATION

S —BROWN LIQUID- STRONG DIESEL FUEL ODOR

T —BROWN LIQUID- STRONG DIESEL FUEL ODOR

U —NO APPARENT CONTAMINATION

V—CONTAMINATION ALONG PIPE STRONG DIESEL FUEL ODOR

W—NO APPARENT CONTAMINATION

._) UQUIO CONTAMINATION — BROWN/BLACK. DIESEL FUEL ODOR

f-T" 1 LIQUID CONTAMINATION — BROWN . DIESEL FUEL ODOR

CRA

figure 3TEST PIT & TRENCH LOCATIONS

FOR VISUAL CHARACTERIZATIONSf. Louis Plant Site

- - - 6 0 TOTAL OIL PIPELINE( Y E L L O W JACKET COATiNGl

6 0 UNCOATED PIPELINE

o.tf,

\ \JGW-I6-Ia,t

LEGEND

- SAMPLING LOCATION SEPT 6, 1982

- SAMPLING LOCATION SEPT 21,1982

- SAMPLING LOCATION OCTOBER ,1982

figure 4SAMPLING LOCATIONS

SEPTEMBER 8 AND 21. 1982St. Louis Plant Site

In general, the soil horizon

beneath private lands consisted of 6

inches to 18 inches of topsoil underlain

by fine to coarse sands. Dense clay till

was encountered at depths ranging from 3

feet to 7 feet.

The soil horizon beneath the Plant

Site consisted of 1 to 9 feet of fill

material (including landfill from the

golf course remedial action program)

underlain by medium to coarse sands. Clay

till, where encountered, ranged from a

depth of 5 to 16 feet beneath existing

ground surface.

2,3.6.2 Extent of Petroleum Based Contamination

Free petroleum based liquid

contaminant exhibiting a strong diesel

fuel odor was identified in boreholes

982A-7, 8, 10, 13, 14, 18, 21, 32, 34, 35,

36, 40, 42, 47, 49, 68.

Soils contaminated with a petroleum

based non-liquid material exhibiting

20

II little or no odor were identified in

boreholes 982A-43, 44, 45, 46, 50, 51, 52

I 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 79,

82, 83, 85, 86, 88, 92, 95, 96, 100, 101,

1 105, 106, 107.

Contamination inferred by a diesel

I fuel odor only was identified in

boreholes 982A-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11,

] 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25,

j 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 37, 38, 39, 41,

66, 67, 70, 71, 73, 75, 76, 77, 91, 103,

No petroleum based liquid or

non-liquid contaminant or odor was

identified in boreholes 982A-58, 59, 63,

64, 72, 74, 78, 80, 81, 84, 87, 89, 90,

93, 94, 97, 98, 99, 102.

Free petroleum based liquid with a•

very strong diesel fuel type odor and

I light brown color was identified in test

pits 982-21-1, 982-21-2, 982-21-3,

982-21-5, 982-21-6, 1082-21-A, 1082-21-F,

1082-21-L, 1082-21-M, 1082-21-N,

21

II 1082-21-P and trenches 1082-21-Q,

- 1082-21-S, 1082-21-T and 1082-21-V.

i2.3.7 Defined Areas of Contaminationi

I Borehole and test pit examination

* indicated that subsurface soils and/or

I ^, groundwater was contaminated by petroleum based

materials within the southern sector of the PlantII Site. The defined areas of contamination are

• indicated on Figure 5. Four distinct zones were

identified on the basis of visual examination of

sampling boreholes and test pits.

Zone A was characterized by the

presence of a free flowing brown liquid petroleum

based contaminant exhibiting a strong diesel fuel

type odor.

Zone B was characterized by a dark

petroleum based liquid having much greater

viscosity relative to liquids in Zone A and

exhibiting a diesel fuel type odor.

Zone C was characterized by soils

containing a very black, highly viscous

22

LEGENDU6W-I5 SAMPLING STATIONS

UPGRACHENT CONTAINMENT WALL

SAMPLING STATIONS I SEPT. 19621

• WW2 OBSERVATION WELL' i f \

LIQUID CONTAMINATION /, f ]CHARACTERIZED 8Y LIGHT BROWN ' /COLOR AND STRONG DIESEL FUEL ODOR

LIQUID CONTAMINATION ICHARACTERIZED BY DARK BROWNTO BLACK COLOR B STRONGDIESEL FUEL ODOR

NON LIQUID CONTAMINATION /CHARACTERIZED BY BLACK COLOR-SLIGHT TO NO ODOR\ ZONECAREA INFERRED CONTAMINATEDBY DIESEL FUEL ODOR ONLY

6 0 TOTAL OIL PIPELINEJACKET COATtW

6"0UNCOATEDPIPELINE

CRA

figure 5ESTIMATED EXTENT OF

SUBSURFACE PETROLEUM BASED CONTAMINATIONSt. Louis Plant Site

Icontaminant having little to no odor. Theigroundwater within Zone C exhibited no odor or

I oil type contamination.

1 Zone D was characterized by a

i diesel fuel type odor only.

j The vertical extent of petroleum

based contamination is apparently limited to the

* ^ soils overlying the clay strata and was generally

\ found between 2 feet and 7 feet below original

ground surface.

2.3.8 Groundwater

Groundwater was encountered

throughout the area sampled at depths ranging

from 1 foot to 4 feet below the original ground

surface. The surface of the lands east of the

plant boundary fence line were very soft and

spongy, and considerable damage and rutting to

grassed areas occurred from equipment movement

during sampling and augering operations.

In addition to well WW2, installed

during the upgradient wall sampling program, four

24

II new observation wells were installed. The

locations of these wells are detailed on Figure

I 6. Each well was installed using a CMB 75 truck

mounted drill rig with 8"0 hollow stem augers.

1 The wells were constructed using a 2"0 black

i steel pipe as a casing and a Johnson Red-Head

1-1/4" O.D. well screen. The well screen was

j attached to the steel pipe casing by an 1-1/4

inch x 2 inch reducer. The well was bottomed at

the interface of the water bearing sands and the

clay till strata. The resulting hole was

backfilled using silica sand and the top 2 feet

was plugged with bentonite. Borehole logs of the

well installations are presented within

Appendix I.

The sampling wells were initially

baled using a 1" diameter copper baler and

allowed to recover for 48 hours. Elevations were

obtained by field survey and computed for the 24

resulting water levels using a U.S.G.S. based

bench mark. A surveyors tape was used to measure

from the top of the stand-pipe to water level.

Groundwater elevations are presented in Table 1.

Figure 6 presents the groundwater contours as

determined from the field data summarized in

Table 1.

25

OBSERVATION WELL ,

(727.32) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION / /(AVERAGE OF SEPT 25 6 OCT. I2/

GROUNDWATER CONTOURS I

r—— — g" TOTAL OIL PIPELINE(YELLOW JACKET COATING I6"UNCOATED PIPELINE

oW A S H I N G T O N ' * AVE

figure 6GROUNDWATER CONTOURS

OCTOBER 1982St. Louis Plant Site

TABLE I

GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS - PLANT SITE

ELEVATIONSAMPLING TOP OF DISTANCE, TOP OFWELL STANDPIPE STANDPIPE TO W.L. GROUNDWATER ELEVATION

Sept. 23/82 Oct. 12/82 Average

735.56 8.17 727.39 726.91 727.15

739.07 11.83 727.24 727.40 727.32

740.00 12.79 727.21 727.98 727.60

743.40 15.25 728.15 727.90 728.03

732.20 5.73 726.47 726.05 726.26

II 2.3.9 Laboratory Analysis

Liquid samples collected from the

1 three sampling stations described previously in

Section 2.3.5 were split two ways with the first

J set forwarded to ERG Laboratories for gas

- chromatograph/mass spectrometric analysis. The

second set was forwarded to RMAL for gas

i chromatograph, boiling point and metal analysis.

] Soil samples collected from the

. three sampling stations described previously in

" Section 2.3.5 were forwarded to RMAL for gas

| chromatograph analysis.

i2.3.10 Analytical Results

I ^~

I 2.3.10.1 Liquid Samples

| GC/MS analytical data from

. ERG is presented within Appendix J.

1 Analytical data from RMAL is

presented within Appendix K.iii 28

II The chromatograms of each of the

three samples were comparable to

sample 982-b-l which was previously

I identified as the source sample. The

boiling range corresponded to diesels

j and kerosenes.

i1 2.3.10.2 Soil Samples

I Analytical data from RMAL is

presented in Appendix L. Analysis

' does not indicate positive correlation

1 with the source sample (982-b-l) or

with any other samples. One sample

] did not contain adequate contaminant

for analysis.

1 "

i2.3.11 Restoration of Private Landsi

In an effort to maintain good

* public relations with the affected land-owners,

1 a temporary repair to all properties which

sustained surficial damage was made by the

I application of topsoil and grass seed.

i1 29

I• The affected land-owners were

assured that a more permanent repair would be

I made at the conclusion of all works in the area.

iiiiiiiii -iiiiii

30

I• 3.0 EXISTING PIPELINES

1 During the course of the

subsurface investigation, a 6" diameter pipeline was exposed

1 at a depth approximately 3 feet below the existing ground

• surface running in a north-south direction, two feet west of

the east plant boundary fence line north of Highway M-46.

I This pipeline was found to be coated with a yellow plastic

material and was laid through the area where the heaviest

] ^ petroleum liquid contamination was encountered.

1 The soil and groundwater

j immediately beneath this section of pipeline was heavily

contaminated by a petroleum based liquid exhibiting a strong

1 diesel fuel type odor.

Three liquid and three soil

I ^- samples were collected in this area on September 21, 1982.

Sample locations are indicated on Figure 9. Liquid samples

I were analyzed by ERG and RMAL. Analysis indicates that the

• contaminant is a No. 2 fuel oil and that all three samples

are highly comparable with the sample previously identified

1 by RMAL as being nearest the source of contamination. Soil

samples have been stored at the Plant Site offices.

I Analytical data is contained within Appendix J & K.

During the sampling program, an

I additional 6 inch diameter pipeline was encountered

31

II approximately 1'-6" east of the protective coated

pipeline. This pipe was not protectively coated.iThis uncoated pipeline was

I subsequently exposed in a northerly direction and was

1 found to have been cut at Station 6+35. This is at a

location where the yellow-jacketed pipeline makes a 90°

1 turn to the west.

I ^- The cut end of the 6"0 uncoated

i pipeline was found to be plugged with a sandy clay

material which was saturated with a petroleum product

1 having a strong diesel-like odor. The ground below and

around the pipeline was also found to be heavily

j contaminated with the same petroleum product. The

i pipeline contained a liquid which resembled water but

also had a distinctive diesel fuel odor.i -Samples were obtained from the

I liquid and soil contents of the pipeline and also from

• soil immediately beneath the exposed cut end. Sample

locations are indicated on Figure 9. One liquid and two

I soil samples were analyzed by RMAL. Analysis indicates

that the chromatograph of the contaminants within one

I soil and the one liquid sample correlated with the

| chromatograph of the contaminant contained in sample

982-b-la, which was previously identified as the sourcei32i

sample. The second soil sample did not contain

sufficient contaminant for accurate analysis.

Analytical data is contained within Appendix L.

The two 6 inch pipelines were also

exposed to the west beyond the 90° bend. The older

uncoated 6"J3 pipeline was found to be cut approximately

155 feet west of the turn and plugged in a similar

fashion with soil. Again, heavy contamination of the

soils underlying the pipeline by a material having a

strong diesel fuel odor was evident.

Samples were obtained from the soil

plug within the cut ends and from beneath the pipeline.

Two soil samples were analyzed by RMAL. Analysis

indicates that the chromatograph for one of the samples

matches the chromatograph for the contaminant contained

in sample 982-b-1a, which was previously identified as

the source sample, although some weathering with loss of

the lighter ends was noted. The second sample did not

contain sufficient contaminant for accurate analysis.

Analytical data is contained within Appendix L.

The coated pipeline was found to

turn approximately 90* to the north. No contamination

was evident in this area.

33

II CRA had, in the past, requested

Total Oil to locate and flag their pipeline locations.

• Total personnel located and flagged a line from the

I bend at the easterly fence line in a northwesterly

direction. This area was trenched at right angles to

1 the flagged line in three different locations along the

alleged pipeline alignment. Trenching operations

* failed to identify a pipeline.

The location of existing pipelines

as field identified are detailed on Figure 7 and 8.

The pipeline was again exposed at

the northwestern corner of the Plant Site south of the

Pine River crossing and west of the old northwest

j dredge pond.

1 ^1 A 6"# yellow jacketed pipeline was

1 found running approximately parallel to a 4"J3 uncoated

pipeline. A very strong diesel fuel type odor was

J evident in soil beneath the 4"j0 pipeline. Two samples

of this soil were collected. One sample was analyzed

• by RMAL and the other was retained at the site office.

t Analysis of the sample by RMAL indicates that the

contaminant corresponds to a No. 2 heating oil.

I Analytical data is contained within Appendix L.

ii

TRENCHES EXCAVATED TOLOCATE PIPELINE

LIQUID CONTAMINATIONLIGHT BROWN/STRONG DIESELFUEL ODOR

LIQUID CONTAMINATIONDARK BROWN/STRONGDIESEL FUEL ODOR

YELLOWJACKET PIPELINE]

SECTION OF 4" 0

60 UNCOATEDPIPELINE

tt .O+OOWASHINGTON

LOCATION OF EXISTINGPIPELINE FACILITIES

St. Lout's Plant Site

FENCELINE

6"0 YELLOW JACKET 9PIPELINE . *»

6"0 UNCOATEO PIPELINE

•H

SOIL & WATER CONTAMINATED BY MATERIALCHARACTERIZED BY BROWN COLOR AND STRONG

DIESEL FUEL ODOR

CLAY TILL

CRAIllS-l/ll/lt

figure 8CROSS-SECTION A - A '

EXISTING PIPELINE FACILITIESSt Louis Plant Site

1082-13-SIIO82-/3- SttOBZ'13-Li

SEPTEMBER, 1962 SAMPLING LOCATIONS

HO82-I9-3 OCTOBER, 1982 SAMPLING LOCATIONS

LWUD CONTAMINATION CHARACTERIZED BYLIGHT BROWN COLOR AND STRONG DIESEL fUEL ODOR

—— LIQUID CONTAMINATION CHARACTERIZED BY DARKBROWN TO BLACK COLOR AND STRONG DIESELFUEL ODOR 6 9 TOTAL OIL PIPELINE

(YELLOW JACKET COATING)

6"0 UNCOATED PIPELINE

ioas-ia-4 \ \ /

figure 9SAMPLING LOCATIONS

SEPTEMBER G OCTOBER,1982 PROGRAMSt. Louis Plant Site

This portion of the pipeline and

sample location is detailed on Figure 10.

A summary of all collected samples•is presented in Table II.

3-1 TOTAL OIL OBSERVER

Mr. Pat Lincoln of Total Oil

was present at the Plant Site on October 18 and 19,

1982.

3.2 TOTAL OIL PIPELINE TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS

Liquids which were transmitted

I ^ through the pipeline from 1960 to 1975 have been

identified in correspondence from Mr. P.A. Lincoln11 Total Petroleum Inc., as a variety of products which

I included regular gasoline, premium gasoline, furnace

oils and JP4. Some light Michigan crude was transmitted

1 in 1975 prior to shutdown of the pipeline.

iiii

' "6" YELLOW JACKET

too'

LDIESEL ODOR VERY STRONG

PROPOSEDCOLLECTION

SYSTEM

Oo_,_ro

ooH——BASELINE

CRA

figure 10PIPELINE LOCATION

NORTH WEST CORNER OF PLANT SITESt. Louis Plant Site

III3-I/M/M

TABLE IISAMPLING DATA

SAMPLE NO. TYPE DATE

9982

982-1-C

UGW 16-2C

UGW 16-3cUGW 16-2aUGW 12-1

UGW 16-1a782-5-1 a

UGW 16-3a982-1a982-2982-3

982-b-1a

982-21-1

982-21-2

982-21-5

T. H. 1T. H. 2

1 082-1 3-S11082-13-S2

1082-13-L11082-19-11082-19-2

1082-19-31082-19-4

1082-19-51082-19-6

1082-19-6-1

1082-21-11082-21-2

OilSedimentLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquidLiquid

LiquidLiquidLiquid

Liquid

LiquidLiquidLiquidLiquidSoilLiquidSoil

LiquidSoil

SoUSoil

SoilSoil

LiquidSoilSoil

SoilSoilSoil

Oil

OilsonSoil

Sept. 8/82

Sept. 8/82Sept. 9/82Sept. 9/82Sept. 8/82Sept. 8/82Sept. 8/82Sept. 8/82

Sept- 8/82Sept. 9/82Sept. 9/82Sept. 9/82

Sept. 9/82Sept. 21/82Sept. 21/82

Sept. 21/82Sept. 21/82

Sept. 21/82Sept. 21/82Sept. 22/82Sept. 22/82

Oct. 13/82Oct. 13/82

Oct. 13/82Oct. 19/82Oct. 19/82

Oct. 19/82Oct. 19/82Oct. 19/82Oct. 19/82

Oct. 19/82Oct. 21/82

Oct. 21/82

LOCATION

Tank BottomW. of UGW16

E. of Million Gallon Tank

UGW 16-60' W.

UGW16-110' W.UGW16-601 W.

Cottrell PropertyUGW 16-101 W.Cottrell PropertyUGW 16-1101 W.E. of Million Gallon TankCottrell PropertyCottrell PropertyCottrell PropertyUGW 16 F.L.UGW 16 F.L.

UGW 16 38' N.UGW 16 38f N.

UGW 16 38' S.UGW 16 38' S.

S. W. Portion PlantS. W. Portion Plant

Inside 6" PipeBelow 6" PipeInside 6" PipeInside 6" PipeInside 6" Pipe20'W. B.H. 57

1501 E. WW 61001 S. WW 6Inside 4" Pipe@UGW17Inside 4" Pipe@UGW17Below 4" Pipe @N.W. PondBelow 4" Pipe @N.W. Pond

ANALYZED BY

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

ERG/TOtai oilERGERG/Total OilERGERG/Total OilERGERG

ERG

RMAL

RMAL/ERG

Retained in OfficeRMAL/ERG

Retained in Office

RMAL/ERGRetained in OfficeRetained in OfficeRetained in Office

RMALRMAL

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

RMAL

Retained in OfficeRMALRetained in Office

II 3.3 PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG

1 During the course of these

investigative programs, a photographic log was

1 maintained in order to visually document subsurface

• pipelines and soil conditions. Excerpts from this log

are presented as follows:iI •—

iiiii -iiiiii

41

PLATE I

UGW-16-2

42

PLATE II

5&fc:^£&rM&.i

» v .*-,*»' 1.^ -«— _ %.

UGW-16 AT FENCELINE

PLATE III

982-21-1, OGW-16 AT FENCELINE

44

PLATE IV

982-21-6, 75' SOUTH OF UGW-16

45

PLATE V

982-21-5, 38' SOUTH OF OGW-16 AT FENCELINE

46

PLATE VI

982-21-2, 38' NORTH OF UGW-16 AT FENCELINE

47

I

PLATE VII

UGW-*6 AT FENCELINE

48

PLATE VIII

982-21-6 LOOKING NORTH

49

PLATE IX

TRENCH WEST OF 6+35 ALONG PIPELINE

50

woo

oB

toUl

x

PLATE XI

DEPTH OP OLD 6" PIPE AT STA. 6+35

52

S€+9 -YXS CIN3H .06

i ix

IIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIII

PLATE XIII

PIPE LINER BENEATH RAILROAD TRACKS WEST OF STA. 6+35

54

PLATE XIV

NEW AND OLD 6" PIPELINE WEST OF STA. 6 + 35

55

PLATE XV

t : Vv

OLD AND NEW PIPELINE WEST OF STA. 6+35(STRONG DIESEL ODOR)

56

PLATE XVI

•*.; *•*- .*

END OF OLD PIPELINE WEST OF STA. 6+35 (WEST END

57

PLATE XVII

SSSSI f ys SS PI IP-w _ fcX .a. ?S .* .*r _• Ti - r.«3 . • .

90" BEND TO NORTHWEST OF STA. 6+35(NOTE CATHODIC PROTECTION)

58

PLATE XVIII

SAMPLING 4M0 PIPELINE ADJACENT TO UGW-17

59

4.0 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

A) It is concluded that subsurface soil and/or groundwater

beneath Velsicol lands and private property have been

contaminated by petroleum based materials* This

contamination is limited in horizontal extent to a

portion of the southerly sector of the Plant Site

property and a limited area of private lands immediately

east of the easterly plant boundary fence line. The

vertical extent of contamination is within the coarse to

fine sands overlying the clay till strata and is

generally within a depth of two to seven feet from

original ground surface.

B) The contaminated area is comprised of three visually

distinct zones.

Contamination beneath the westerly one half of the

southerly sector of the Plant Site (hereafter referred

to as Zone C) is by a very viscous, black, petroleum

based material exhibiting little to no odor.

Contamination of the easterly one-third of the southerly

sector of the Plant Site (hereafter referred to as

Zone A) is by a brown, liquid, free flowing petroleum

based material exhibiting a strong diesel fuel type

odor.

60

Between Zones A and C lies an area which contains a

brown to black free flowing petroleum based material

exhibiting a diesel fuel type odor. This zone

(hereafter referred to as Zone B) appears to be a mixing

interface zone between Zones A and C.

C) The contaminant within Zones A and B is highly mobile

and may seriously impact installation of the proposed

Plant Site upgradient containment wall and storm sewer

unless it is contained or removed prior to construction

of the noted structures. Further, a long term potential

of discharge of this contaminant to the Pine River

exists, unless the contaminant is contained or removed

from the land area to be dewatered by the proposed storm

sewer.

The contaminant within Zone C appears to be immobile.

It is concluded that this contaminant will not in the

short term impact construction of the proposed Plant

Site downgradient containment wall, and will be securely

contained in the long term by the noted structure.

D) Laboratory characterization has identified the

freeflowing liquid contaminant in Zone A to be a No. 2

fuel oil, No. 2 diesel oil, or a kerosene.

61

Laboratory characterization has identified the immobile

contaminant in Zone C to be a mixture of unidentified

but unrelated substances and diesel or fuel oil, since

samples 1082-19-3 and 1082-19-4 exhibit some correlation

to the previously identified source sample. Sample

1082-19-5 does not correlate to any other sample.

E) Adjacent to the easterly plant boundary fence line north

of Highway M-46, two approximately parallel 6"0

pipelines have been identified and uncovered. Total

Petroleum Inc. officials have verbally stated the two

identified pipelines are owned by Total Pipeline

Corporation. One pipeline is coated with yellow plastic

material while the second line is uncoated. Total Oil

officials have stated, and documents in Velsicol's

possession indicate, that the existing six inch

pipeline(s) replaced two four inch pipelines in the

1950's.

F) At the point where the pipeline installation bends to

the west into the Plant Site from the easterly fence

line, and again at the point where this pipeline

installation bends to the north in the interior of the

Plant Site, the uncoated six inch pipeline has been cut

and removed. The cut ends were found to have soil plugs

and one section of line contained liquid with a distinct

diesel fuel odor.

62

G) In the north west quadrant of the Plant Site, the six

inch coated pipeline was uncovered and found to be

running parallel to a four inch uncoated pipeline.

The soil adjacent to and beneath the pipeline

installation was found to be contaminated with petroleum

based material having a strong diesel fuel odor.

H) Along the easterly fenceline portion of the pipeline

installation, soil and groundwater beneath the pipelines

are heavily contaminated with the brown liquid petroleum

product characterized by a strong diesel fuel type odor.

At other points where the pipeline installation was

uncovered, soils adjacent to and beneath the pipeline

were heavily contaminated with a petroleum based

material characterized by a strong diesel odor. In

these other areas no attempt was made to observe

groundwater.

I) Samples of groundwater and/or soils were collected from

four locations at the pipeline installation along the

easterly plant boundary fence line, and at three other

locations at the pipeline installation within the

interior of the Plant Site.

Laboratory characterization of these samples has

identified the major petroleum based contaminant to be

63

No. 2 diesel oils or kerosene. The analyzing

laboratories have also identified the contaminant

collected at the easterly fence line installation as

being nearest to the source of contamination.

Characterization of the contaminant samples from Zone A

west of the easterly fence line indicate the material is

related to the 'source1 samples but has undergone

varying degrees of weathering, generally being more

weathered the further west from the pipeline the

material was located.

J) Total Petroleum Inc. has stated that products similar to

the contaminant in Zone A have been pumped through the

pipeline facilities previously discussed.

K) The area identified by the analyzing laboratories as the

'source1 area of contamination is located east of the

easterly plant boundary fence line as it existed during

plant operational periods. Records do not indicate that

the plant at any time stored or handled No. 2 diesel

fuel, No. 2 fuel oil, or kerosene in the 'source1 area.

The only facility of record within the 'source1 area

which handled one or more of the identified petroleum

based contaminants is the transmission pipeline facility

apparently owned by Total Pipeline Corporation.

64

L) On the basis of evidence to date, it is concluded that

the highly mobile petroleum contaminant within Zone A

originated from the pipeline facility as it now exists

or from former pipelines in the same location replaced

by the existing facility.

All of which is respectfully submitted

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED

Richard G. Shepherd, P. Eng

Frank A. Rovers, P. Eng

Donald Robinson

65

I4

I

APPENDIX A

iiiii

AUTHORIZATION TO ENTER PRIVATE LANDS

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED651 Colby Drive,

Con.ultlng Eng!n».ri Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2V 1C2" (519)884-0510

III11111I1I1III11

September 3, 1982 Reference 9-1078C-13

Miss Audrey Phelps115 N. Watson StreetSt. Louis, Michigan 48880

Dear Miss Phelps,

As you are aware, Velsicol Chemical Corporation have engaged Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Limited to perform a sub-surface investigatory programin order to determine the depth of clay till, groundwater flow and characteristicsand general soils classification in conjunction with the closure and securementof the St. Louis facility.

Unfortunately, we find it necessary to excavate once more. This willentail, with your permission, excavation of a pit approximately 61 x 6' x 6'which would be fenced and allowed to remain open for approximately 48 hours.At which time the hole will be backfilled, topsoiled and seeded. At the sametime a temporary repair would be effected upon the damage which our previousdrilling program caused.

Within approximately 2 weeks, a decision will be made as to Velsicols*ultimate plans at which time you will be contacted and a permanent repair to yourproperty will be made.

Should you have any questions, comments, or criticisms, please do nothesitate to call the undersigned at 681-5726.

Yours truly,

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC., LTD.

Don Robinson

DR:dw

By my signature, I hereby grant permission to CRA to enter my/our lands in orderto excavate test pits. I understand that all damage will be repaired to mysatisfaction at Velsicols' cost.

•Sudrey Phelps / cc: E. SmithR. ShepherdM. Lawton

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED651 Colby Drive.

Consulting EngfnMn ^9)664^0^°'


Mr. Howard Cottrill123 North WatsonSt. Louis, Michigan 48880

Dear Mr. Cottrell,

As you are aware, Velsicol Chemical Corporation have engagedConestoga-Rovers & Associates, Limited to perform a sub-surface investigatoryprogram in order to determine the depth of clay till, groundwater flow andcharacteristics and general soils classification in conjunction with theclosure and securement of the St. Louis facility.

Unfortunately, we find it necessary to excavate once more. Thiswill entail, with your permission, excavation of a pit approximately6? x 61 x 6f which would be fenced and allowed to remain open for approx-imately 48 hours. At which time the hole will be backfilled, topsoiled andseeded. At the same time a temporary repair would be effected upon thedamage which our previous drilling program caused.

Within approximately 2 weeks, a decision will be made as to Velsicols*ultimate plans at which time you will be contacted and a permanent repair to yourproperty will be made.


Yours truly,

LTD.CONESTQGA-RQOTRS

Don Robinson

DR:dw

By my signature, I hereby grant permission to CRA to enter my/our lands in orderto excavate test pits. I understand that all damage will be repaired to mysatisfaction at Velsicols1 cost.

Howard Cottrill . cc: E. SmithR. ShepherdM. Lawton

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED651 Colby Drive,

Consulting Engln»r« £"Aft«£°i5,n«artO* Canada N2V 1C2(519) B84-0510


Mr. Roquel Serna201 N. Watson StreetSt. Louis, Michigan 48880

Dear Mr. Serna,

As you are aware, Velsicol Chemical Corporation have engaged Conestoga-Rovers & Associates, Limited to perform a sub-surface investigatory program inorder to determine the depth of clay till, groundwater flow and characteristicsand general soils classification in conjunction with the closure and securementof the St. Louis facility.

Unfortunately, we find it necessary to excavate once more. This willentail, with your permission, excavation of a pit approximately 61 x 6' x 61which would be fenced and allowed to remain open for approximately 48 hours.At which time the hole will be backfilled, topsoiled and seeded. At the same timea temporary repair would be effected upon the damage which our previous drillingprogram caused.

Within approximately 2 weeks, a decision will be made as to Velsicols'ultimate plans at which time you will be contacted and a permanent repair to yourproperty will be made.


Yours truly,

CONESTOGA-ROVERS& ASSOC., LTD.

Don Robinson

DR:dw

By my signature, I hereby grant permission to CRA to enter my/our lands in orderto excavate test pits. I understand that all damage will be repaired to mysatisfaction at Velsicols1 cost.

"Roque 1 ssSer-ria"-"" cc: E. Smith^^ R. Shepherd

M. Lawton

CRAConsulting Engineer*

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED651 Colby Drive,Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2V 1C2(519)864-0510


Miss Audrey Phelps115 N. Watson StreetSt. Louis, Michigan 48880

Dear Miss Phelps,

We are again asking for your cooperation and understandingregarding our investigatory program in order to determine the depthof clay till and the groundwater flow™

When we drilled on your property September 7, 1982, our ifindings were not as favorable as we had hoped. So again we must )drill more test pits in order to finish up our investigation and returnyour property back to normal.as soon as possible. -,

Within 2 weeks time we shall know what the decision is to J

be regarding Velsicol's ultimate plan for closure of the St. LouisPlant Site. I

Should you have any questions, comments, or criticisms, pleasedo not hesitate to contact me at 681-5726. |

.Yours very truly,


. Don RobinsonDR:dw

cc: E. Smith; R. Shepherd; M. Lawton

By my signature, I hereby grant permission to CRA to enter my/our landsin order to excavate more test pits. I understand that all damagesto my land will be repaired to ray satisfaction at Velsicol's cost.

Audrey Phelps /

CRACon tutting Engineers

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED651 Colby Drive.Waterloo, Ontario. Canada N2V 1C2(519}884-0510


Mr. Howard Cottrill123 North WatsonSt. Louis, Michigan 48880

Dear Mr. Cottrill,

We are again asking for your cooperation and understandingregarding our investigatory program in order to determine the depthof clay till and the groundwater flow.

When we drilled on your property September 7, 1982, ourfindings were not as favorable as we had hoped. So again we mustdrill more test pits in order to finish up our investigation and returnyour property back to normal as soon as possible.

Within 2 weeks time we shall know what the decision is tobe regarding Velsicol's ultimate plan for closure of the St. LouisPlant Site.

Should you have any questions, comments, or criticisms, pleasedo not hesitate to contact me at 681-5726.

Yours very truly


' Don RobinsonA "" * *

DR:dv

cc: E. Smith; R. Shepherd? M. Lawton

By my signature, I hereby grant permission to CRA to enter my/our landsin order to excavate more test pits. I understand that all damagesto my land will be repaired to my satisfaction at Velsicol's cost.

Howard Cottrill

CRAConsulting EnglriMf*

CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES LIMITED651 Cotby Drive,Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2V 1C2(519)884-0510


Mr. Roquel Serna201 N. Watson St.St. Louis, Michigan

Dear Mr. Serna,

48880

We are again asking for your cooperation and understandingregarding our investigatory program in order to determine the depthof clay till and the groundwater flow*

When we drilled on your property September 7, 1982, ourfindngs were not as favorable as we had hoped. So again, we must ndrill more test pits in order to finish up our investigation and return jyour property back to normal as soon as possible.

Within 2 weeks time we shall know what the decision is tobe regarding Velsicol's ultimate plan for closure of the St. Louis 'Plant Site.

Should you have any questions, comments, or criticisms, pleastdo not hesitate to contact me at 681-5726.

Yours very truly,


Don Robinsonff 'DR:dw

cc: E. Smith; R. Shepherd; M. Lawton

APPENDIX B

* "EXPLORATORY SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

1 - PLANT SITE - ST. LOUIS, MICHIGAN"

I FIGURES, BOREHOLE LOGS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS

ii

0* 100* 200'

FENCELINE ON PROPERTY BOUNDARY

AREA CONTAINING LIQUIDCONTAMINANTAREA DETERMINED CONTAMINATEDBY ODOR

OIL PIPELINE (ABANDONED)

ucw-is UPGRADIENT CONTAINMENT WALLBOREHOLES

QJ/s-50 SUBSURFACEBOREHOLES

SOIL INVESTICAT(ON

UGWW-Z MONITORING WELL

WASHINGTON AVENUE

CRA

figure 4ESTIMATED EXTENT OFSUBSURFACE OIL PLUME

Sf. Louis P/ont S/'fe

//T182"~TII5 TI I6 J

TII6

A

B

FORMER STORAGE TANKSAND DESIGNATOR

AREA.CONTAINING LIQUID2 CONTAMINANT

CRA

AREA DETERMINED CONTAMINATEDBY ODOROIL PIPELINE (ABANDONED)

FENCEL1NE ON VELSICOLPROPERTY LINE

figure 5ORIGINAL SITE CONDITIONS

St. Louis Plant Site1076 -28/06/82

UICIHBAH TESTIIIG EKGIL'EERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

_ LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO

BOWING NO

ELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATK

CREW C1 S«mp>«• El*v>

•

.

i-

9•i|

9_

9M ——————

If

\

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIO-»w , G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT / FT? 1

G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT PT.t-V f\ , n _ ——— - GW AFTITR COMPLETION / PTC'

\t \ \\ <\ 1 G.W. AFTER , MRS. *T.H1EF "s^V iJ : V w HPLPER Ki Vj _ aw VOLUMES LVf.v^-^-

D»pth

0

1

2

3'

4

6

a

7

.

.

10 v

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

1.

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

L*"*nd

\

NS

INS-INS.

' INS.INS.

DiBPth Soft DMCfipilon .

• Chano* ( D»ntiTy, Moinuri, Color. Texture, Btc. ) Blow* /6**

oto.O I

• V't,i ^^

dL r -Jxo^ ^O-^r, CoA/S^-^-^OU^

M ^\

^ o(L r A ov <-r-\j «'SC* . ( >i **^ V A . -* i ** w«- •_*• A J /i \ ( \i i / '

\3.O& i /1 _I ——————

1

IRHB "^H

J

S !i;

———______ 1

IIi —————• ii

11——B

> IStart taking routine penetration test one foot above nominal depth & drive 18".

DATE

f;.ICHI6AM TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.. - GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSr>*- Q"8~L LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

SORING NO ^AtPROJECT IXLOCATION <~: OlM-r U.JO

CREW CHIEF HFIPER

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED ATG.W. ENCOUNTERED ATG.W. AFTER COMPLETIONG.W. AFTER MRS.G.W, VOLUMES

FT.FT.FT.

,NS

INS.INS.INS.

] &*mpla

J

1iK--•pL1

^

i

D*piti

O

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

.

B

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

IB

1ft

20

21

22

23

24

25

L**""d

"A

D*rtfi Soil DMcnptlon / f

Ch«n»» ( Density. Moiitur*. Color. Tcxturi, etc. ) Blows /«*'

-

I'3U

^^^ V 3

5'^6'o

-

>fto^ - , -r0 JNJ^iO^v 5,t L.T £^MG. ^ O / S f S t r ' l_\ •» V-T"(} ' rA 'c\JcAcrf r n \s~\ e » » v ^ i*. HUJ vj r^t~$ v * vSA ' N, 0, « « -r-^ iA^ -t-i /o^l &*tL,\t V- V) i O v l O oe-irt. u»>-cJT\

R1 l ' v 8O f "i fr<Lb*^SL V \w^t. (S-CA^-^ \JU-Aj ^

tFO(S J H ——1K1 —

-

I1-

x - 1i

. - •*

""'%'f' • • • " ' 1 —

i•«

1

VioO

i%**1«t

O)

V1

Start taking routine penetration test one foot above nominal depth & drive 18".

DATE

C.ICHI6AM TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS


I

JOB NO

BONING

ELEVATION'ROJECT

LOCATIC

^REW CS«mpl*

_ El*v.

,

1

^.|

B•j

iI•

1

i1

I

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION"»W , ,„_. ,. G.W ENCOUNTERED AT FT.

G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT,G.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT.

VI ( i V r\ "^- G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.HtEF \ \V ^..V<r V r / HFI PER V^s . li „ GW VOLUMES

D«Ptti

O

1

a

3

4

s

6

7

a

6

10

11

la

13

14

IS

16

17

1B

19

70

21

33

33

2«

as

L*9«nd

JSINS.

INS.INS.INS.

b«th So" D^cription P.n.u.tion1 Of -

Ch*n** |x ' D»niit£ Moiftur*. Color. Ttxlura. «te. t Blewi /S" y^i

3'^

y u / nsJAuJ^w O>AO A c\xU.\ijJ N./^vt'T* V Vww

1 x a — iv-

a•

\CcU-o.-Ai _ 1 '

___

•1—— e

i

-

1;tt)

0>Q.Oct-«

O

rre

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-D1STURB6D U.L.-UNOIST. LINER S.T. -SMELBV TUBE I.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

Start taking routine penetration test one foot above

KICHIB* DATE £~> "" I " ft 7^

ri;

:;\2Ito

Jj

OO

i**i/tflj* ;

CO1o>

1c

!1I

'ROJEC7

-OCATIC

:REW cSample

_ Elev.

11111 —

11

F

rI

1

<L u.,.>AN TFSTIHG FKRIt,'FERSr IMC.

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS R|N N 0^?Uj- | 'LOG OF SOIL BORING .^y Qp(.

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONIN ._. , , , . , . . . , , GW ENCOUNTERED AT ^£_ FT. ^

G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^ H\ t . G <* AFTF« COMPLETION FTVyt I' V \ V G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.

•4IPF «A>\£r> VCV t HPIPER V)f^N-r^- G* VOLUMES . . - . — - --

Depth

0

1

a

3

4

B

B

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

2.

L-ndDepth

Chenpe

/ ' O9 'Co

5'of e -o

8-0

JS

INS.INS.INS.INS.

Soil Description i •

( Density. Moifturt, Color. Texture, etc. ) Blow* /B"

^.-,- A^u«-t rsmA^/ii,^^ AJuniCT

3 1 ^ !A*-o-^ "AAP A r n.^ to v <? P O OMI >L\ ^*vj"\ \ C*V •

xJ \ U~li M O ^ M »O S 0 ^ 6 fi C /W^V v.. i^* *~. LN C * i ' LLJ C. H

o ^- V *fV^~r O. ^*w Q >^ \ r & i— f**> o <? ci 1 —.... . . ...... ... • .... . . .... . ......... .n __....^ r- m^ jA vu sOvj ^ \ A ^ /S n r w 1 1 u i - rO^"\ i i Vp i Jjv / i M<? v r / BiTorb' —

|—IB——— i

|—1

-

-

. •

• " . .- . .

- ' • | ——_ . Bfl

J__

biiunia' / ^ Cf . O o

DATE (-» ! '* C

f on icri

LOCATK

CREW C1 S»mpl«U Elw.

1I

:f*L1Q- 1a

'

e no

mln

a

£JOA**

§

SO

1;%iswaI3sI1r00

1-

1-

1

.-- ' <-%» 1i t

HH icoi i t .u chDiucrna r m^. Jn. M0 iGEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS ( >^v, 1 i n 1

• DRIMQ NO 'V. ^-' ' ( )

LOG OF SOIL BORING \rn' n'r<ELFVATiON 1 O^, A ' *^ ' •• -

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN . ___^ O.W fhlCOUNTERep AT fj: |NS

O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ft IN;

\'\ U \ V ( O.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INiHIEF \\V .. V^ \t-»* HFIPER ^lA^>-\\* _ a.w. VOLUMU V I A - .

O*pth

0

1

3

3

4

s

«7

.

•

10

11

13

13

14

18

16

17

H

19

30

31

33

33

34

as

L*** ( Depthol

3*o

Sol) D**crlpt)on _

( Dtnihy. Moiituri. Color, Texture, etc. ) Btowt/(H/^A

^^ A(/. , ys,^, ,., ^/V.-T- ( fe.^\ 1 ——i - 1

••|

£05 (^^(lo.A^ ' 1 ——1 — *I

1••gJ —•••

,*

-

B-

'ii

)

)

1^1

/

11]

-1

1

1

'l

J

s

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LINER S.T. - SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SPL1T S^OON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

er

Submitted To:

Conestoga-Rovers Associates, LTD.c/o Velslcol Chemical Corporation500 North Bankson StreetSt. Louis, MI 48880

Attn: Mr. Richard G. Shepherd

Report Date:

Certified By:

June 24, 1982

/ HamAnn Arb&r gp'erations Manager

Samples Received By: June 8, 1982

Client P .O . Number: Letter

ERG Project Number: 8695

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. • 117 N. FIRST • ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104 • 313/662-3104

Conestoga-RoversERG Project #8695June 24, 1982

Sample IUGW-15-C (Monitoring well water with oil)

Water by Distillation Result: 92.13%

Sample IUGW-15-B (Soil sample with oil)

Sulfur Result: 0.28*

BTU per Ib. Result: 19,136 i

Note: Identification of the petroleum fraction 1n the I,soil sample 1s difficult in that 1t follows no set Ispecification uniformly. It has color characteristic •*of a number six oil but viscosity would suggest a much )more refined product, possibly even greater than a ]number two or diesel fuel. The heating value suggests 1heating ranges found 1n number two and intermediate Igrade oils. j

The best possible conclusion we could arrive at would jbe to suggest that this could be a waste oil or a number Isix oil that has been diluted with some higher refined Iproduct such as a solvent. 1

1

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC.

Conestoga-RoversERG Project 18695June 24, 1982

Sample #UGW-15-C (Monitoring well water with oil)

Water by Distillation Result: 92.13%

Note: No visible layer of oil formed after severaldays of letting the sample sit. Since less than 8%is non-aqueous, oil determination was.not feasible.No further tests were performed.

Sample IUGW-15-B (Soil sample with oil)

Sulfur Result: 0.28%

BTU per Ib. Result: 19,136

Note: Identification of the petroleum fraction inthe soil sample is difficult in that it follows noset specification uniformly. It has color character-istic of a number six oil but viscosity would suggesta much more refined product, possible even greaterthan a number two or diesel fuel. The heating valuesuggests heating ranges found in number two and inter-mediate grade oils.

The best possible conclusion we could arrive at wouldbe to suggest that this could be a waste oil or a numbersix oil that has been diluted with some higher refinedproduct such as a solvent.


.MORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

Submitted To:

Conestoga-Rovers and Associates, Ltdc/o Hooker Chemical Co.Bldg L-147th St. and Buffalo Ave.Niagara Falls, NY 14302

Attn: Richard G. Shepherd

Report Date:

Certified By:

July 7, 1982

Fra/ik'T. "Hammer " " ' ' XAnn Arbor Operations Manager

Samples Received By: June 28, 1982

Client P.O. Number: Don Robinson

ERG Project Number: 8739

ERG Sample Number: 06/075849

Client ID: UGW-17 . Oily Water(natural water matrix)

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GROUP, INC. • 117 N. FIRST • ANN A R B O R , MICHIGAN 48104 •313/662-3104

Conestoga-RoversERG Project #8739July 7, 1982

The following procedures were performed:

Sample was allowed to settle for two days to allow a distinct layerof oil to form.

Result of BTU/lb analysis was 8,800. This is low for diesel oils,since #6 diesel typically runs about 18,000 BTU/lb. The oil layerwas contaminated with water and sediment. #6 diesel with similarcontamination shows approximately 12,000 BTU/lb, which furtherindicates that #6 diesel is not in the layer.

The odor is that of a distinct asphalt-based material which ischaracteristic of solvents used to thin asphalt. "RC-70" wassuggested because it contains an asphalt base with fuel oil, andnaptha as a dispersant.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GROUP. INC.

LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

Submitted To:

Conestoga-Rovers & Associates500 Bankson StreetSt. Louis, MI 48880

Attn: Rick Shepherd

Report Date:

Certified By:John WilsonManager, Inorganics Laboratory

Samples Received By: July 14, 1982

Client P.O. Number: Don Robinson (7/13/82)

ERG Project Number 8781


Conestoga-RoversERG Project #8781July 20, 1982

Sample IUGW 16, July 16, Split with Total Sample

% Sulfur 0.35 %

B.T.U./lb 12,432

Sample #UGW 17

% Sulfur 0.85 %

B.T.U./lb 13.438

Note: Regarding classification of samples UGW #16and 17, both appear to be number six oil. SampleUGW 117 exhibits, both heating value and sulfur valueexpected for a normal number six oil. There are,however, large amounts of solids, mostly sediment,suspended in the hydrocarbon fraction. Sample UGW116 gives low values for heating value and sulfurfor a number six oil. If, however, the water con-tamination, which is severe, is taken into accountwe would expect results as demonstrated.


APPENDIX C

"FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM

- WATSON STREET - ST. LOUIS, MICHIGAN"

FIGURES, BOREHOLE LOGS AND LABORATORY ANALYSIS

UGW- 15

732-

0 txf 4tf

U6W-I6

EAST PLANT SITEPROPERTY BOUNDARY

782-13

USW-17LEGEND

SAMPLING STATIONSJULY 21 , 1982SAMPLING STATIONSUPGRADtENT CONTAINMENT WALL

FENCE ON PLANT SITEPROPERTY BOUNDARY

UGW-18

• UGW-19

782-2 782-3m BB a 782-19

_&T82-4

I______._

if_ _PJT_Cb __ — —

782-8"^^ 782-9m s ,

ct-i a

CB

i

, 782-6 DQ

««-*

782-12S LJ _ .

•*———*•

782-17

I

iv

1-co

zoCO

•: M-46 :WASHINGTN.:AVE.-

f igure 2SAMPLING LOCATIONS EAST

OF VELSICOL PROPERTY LINESt. Louis Plant

107 i -XC/07/12

(5

L E G E N D

FENCE ON PLANT SITEPROPERTY BOUNDARY

SAMPLING STATIONSMAY & JUNE PROGRAMS

SAMPLING STATIONSJULY 21 INVESTIGATIVE PROG.AREA CONTAINING LIQUIDCONTAMINATION ON PLANT SITEAREA DETERMINED CONTAMINATEDBY ODOR ON PLANT SITEAREA CONTAINING LIQUID CONTAMINATIONEAST OF tAREA DETERMINED CONTAMINATED BY ^ODOR EAST OF t

V ;>:M-46-WASHINGTON-•AVE.".::CRA- . " • • • . - ; > • - • - - . • - • - * . - -*: •- - . - • *•'.

figure 3ESTIMATED

EXTENT OF SUBSURFACEOIL BASED CONTAMINATION

St. Louis Plant Site

I07I-2C/07/IZ

-o-LABOBATORY ANALYSIS REPORT

erSubmitted To:

Conestoga-Rovers Associates, LTD.c/o Velsicol Chemical Corporation500 North Bankson StreetSt. Louis, MI 48880

Attn: Mr. Richard G. Shepherd

Report Date:

Certified By: •

August 4, 1

FranOperations r, Ann Arbor

Samples Received By: July 23, 1982

Cl i en t P . O . Number : Don Robinson

ERfa Project Number: 8805


Conestoga- RoversERG Project 18805August 4, 1982

Sample % Water by Distillation

Sample #782-5A 96.46

Sample I7S2-5B 98.59

Note: Both samples are composed of large volumes of waterwith sediment and slight hydrocarbon contamination.

Sample 782-5A would seem to have a slightly larger amount |of hydrocarbon contamination, due to the percentage of water 'shown and also by the odor threshold.

Odor would suggest kerosene as the major source of hydrocarboncontamination.


PROJECT NAME :

JOB N* : _^_

STRATIGRAPH1C AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGFIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WftTSCN ST. HOL£ Ng.___ 782-1

9-1078

CLIENT :Velsicol Chemical Corporation

DATE COMPLETED:July 21, 1982

HOLE TYPE :Split Spoon Sampling

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _

LOCATION :St. Louis, Michigan TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION:

PROFILE

DEP

TH(E

LEVA

TION

)

0 -

1-

2-

3-

4 -

5-

6-

7-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION 6 REMARKS

Tops oil- *" Medium sand "*"•-

Brown, moist, compact

Medium sandBrown, wet, very compact

' Sandy clay ^-Brown, moist, very stiff

Silty clayGrey, moist, very stiffEnd of borehole

2(9

iE

T7m '

E:^I*

~^ GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS T WATER FOUND

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2 .0*

2'-0" to 4 l-6"Oily Liquid

SAMPLE

NUM

BER

f-

ou.w

OD

PENETRATIONTESTBLOWS / FOOT

20 40 60 «0

V STATIC WATER LEVEL

PROJECT NAME :

JOB N« : ____

STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGFIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WATSCN ST.

HOLE N«:7B2-2

9-1078

CLIENT : Velsicol Chemical CorporationDATE COMPLETED:

July 21, 1982

HOLE TYPE :Split Spoon Sampling

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _

LOCATION : St. Louis, Michigan TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION:

PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

o-

1-

2-

3-

4-

5-

6-

7-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION a REMARKS

Tops oil

Medium sandbrown, wet

Silty claygrey, moist

—— End of borehole ——————————

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

T

MONITORINSTALLATION

-

Water @ 2 '6"

Faint fuelOil odor @ 4'0"

'

-

SAMPLE

NUM

BER

i-

BLOW

S /

FOO

T

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 »0

,

Js-

J GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL

STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT NAME :

JOB N» : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WftTSCK ST.

9-1078

HOLE N*:

DATE

782-3

July 21, 1982

CLIENT : .Velsicol chemical Corporation^

HOLE TYPE : Split Spoon jamplinq_____

LOCATION : St. Louis, Midiigan_____

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _

TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION:

PROFILE

DEP

TH(E

LEV

ATI

ON

)

0 -

1-

2 -

3-

4 -

5 -

6-

7-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION & REMARKS

Topsoil ^

Medium sand - brown, moist

Medium sand - brown, wet

Silty clay - grey, moist

—— End of borehole - —————————

STRA

TIGR

APHY

k*7-f\.

t.:/:5

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2 ' 6 M

2' to 4' fuel oilodor strong/

4'

SAMPLE

NUM

BER ua.

i-

BLOW

S / F

OO

T

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS / FOOT

20 40 60 BO

J GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS T WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL


JOB N« : ____

CLIENT :

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WRTSCN ST. HOLE N*. 782-4

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED: July 21. 1982Chemical Corporation

HOLE TYPE .- Split Spoon Sampling

LOCATION : St. Louis, Michigan

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0 -™

1-

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION ft REMARKS

Tops oil



Sandy clay - brown, moist&nd or borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

V

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'6"

No odor

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R bJQ.

t-

8U.

v>

m

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 SO

S.

\.

f

-/

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS T WATER FOUND STATIC WATER LEVEL

STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT NAME •

JOB N« : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, W&TSCN ST.

9-1078HOLE N»:

DATE

782-5

July 2 1

CLIENT : Velsicol Chemical Corporation

HOLE TYPE : Split Spoon Sampling____

LOCATION : St. Louis. Michigan_____

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0 -

1 -

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

9 -

-

-


Tops oil

Medium sand - grey, wet

Sandy clay - grey, moist

End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

V

HQ

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'0"

Oil liquid at 2 '?'

J

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R bJ0.>1-

oob.•s.CO

_;CD

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 80


STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT MAMF • FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, MRTSCN ST. H O L E N » : 782-6

JOB N8 .

CLIENT : .

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED :Chemical Corporation

Spoon SamplingHOLE TYPE •


GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DEP

TH(E

LEVA

TION

)

0 -

1-

2 -

3-

4-

5-

6-

7-

8-

9-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION 6 R E M A R K S

Tops oil





——— End of borehole ——————————

STRA

TIGR

APHY

VV.V.V.

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2 i O "

Faint fuel odor at*) i f

^

SAMPLE

NUM

BER ua.

I-

&ou.X.CO§CD

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 SO BO

^

~N«

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS T WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL


JOB N« : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, VRTSCN ST. HOLE 782-7

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED:——JVlY 21, 1962



LOCATION : St. Louis, Michigan_____

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION; _


PROFILE

DEP

TH -

(ELE

VATI

ON

)

o -

1 -

2 -

3-

4 -

5 -

6-

7-

;-


Topsoil



""•"'" End of borehole

STRA

TIG

RAPH

Y

V

iKvK

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 1 '611

2f to 41 faintfuel odor

J

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R ma.i-

BLO

WS

/ FO

OT

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS / FOOT

20 40 60 BO

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL


JOB N« : _____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, HRTSCN ST. HOLE N«: 782-8

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED r

CLIENT • Velsico1 Chemical Corporation

HOLE TYPE • Split Spoon Sampling____

LOCATION : St. Louis, Michigan______

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION:_


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0 -

1-

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6-

7 -


-

Tops oil



— "• •• End of borehole

c(9

iKfe

V

I-

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'0"2' to 4' oilyliquid;

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R

UJa.

BLO

WS

/ FO

OT

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 BO

S|

,

] GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS T WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL

STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOG

I

PROJECT NAME :

JOB N« : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, VftTSCK ST.

9-1078

HOLE N«r 782-9

DATE rnuPiFTFp. July 21, 1982


HOLE TYPE: Split Spoon Sampling_____

LOCATION : St. "Louis, Michigan_____

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0 -

1 -

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

-

-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION 6> REMARKS

Tops oil

Course sand - brown, wet


End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

1I1

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2 '0"2' to 4' oilyliquid

J>

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R

ISt-

&ou.>vIfl§00

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 SO 80



JOB N« : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, HftTSCN ST. HQL£ 782-10

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED: July 21, 1982

CLIENT • Ve^s*co* Chemical Corporation

HOLE TYPE• Split Spoon Sampling____


GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0 -

1 -

2 .

3 .

4 .

5 .

6 .

7 .


Tops oil



— — End of borehole ——————————

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

V:|:|:|:¥:

MONITORINSTALLATION

water @ 2 '0M

2' to 4' faintfuel oil odor

'

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R

I-

BLO

WS

/ FO

OT

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 SO 80

^

r*-i

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL


JOB N« : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WVTSQ3 ST.

9-1078_______________________

CLIENT : Velsicol Chemical Corporation__________

HOLE TYPE : Split Spoon Sampling______________

LOCATION : St. Louis, Michigan_______________

HOLE N»:

DATE

782-11

July 21, 1982

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DEP

TH(E

LEV

ATI

ON

)

0 -

In

2 -

•} _

4 -

5 -

6-

7 -


Topsoil


Sandy clay - brown, moist

End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

v

MONITORINSTALLATION

water @ 2*0 "

No odor

SAMPLE

NUM

BER

Ul0.

l-

oou.V.en§ID

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 80

GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS V WATER FOUND V STATIC WATER LEVEL


JOB NS : ____

INVEST. PROGRAM, VfrTSCN ST.. HOL£ 782-12

9-1078DATE COMPLETED:

July 21, 1982

CLIENT Velsicol Chemical Corporation

HOLE TYPE : Split Spoon Sampling

LOCATION :

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

._ GROUND ELEVATION : __St. Louis, Michigan „ TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION:

PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VATI

ON

)

0 -

1-

2 -

3-

4 -

5 -

6-

7-


Tops oil

Medium sand - brown

Silty clay - moist

End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water - noneencountered

Ho odor

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R

Ua.i-

8Ik"vo>s0

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 80

s.

s_

r*

^*


STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT NAME • FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, VRTSCN ST. HOLEN«:______782-13

JOB N« : ____ 9-1078 DATE rnup. rrrp. July 21, 19B2




GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DEP

TH(E

LEV

ATI

ON

)

o -

1-

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

-

-

-


Tops oil



end of borehole

STRA

TIGR

APHY

7

I

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 1 '611

i — x2* to 4 ' strongfuel oil odor4 ' oil liquid4" to 5 * strongfuel oil odor

}

SAMPLE

<DxUJo.H

OOb.V.vt

ffi

PENETRATIONTEST8 LOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 80


STRATIGRAPH1C AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT MAMF •

JOB NS :

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM/ VRTSCN ST. HQLE N9. 782-14

9-1078 DATE CQMPtFTFn- July 21, 1982


HOLE TYPE : Split Spoon Sampling


GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION :


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0-

™

1-

2-

3-

4 -

5-

6-

7-

-

-

STRATIGRAPHYDESCRIPTION a REMARKS

^^ Tops oil _^.




cna ot Dorehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

•&

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ a 'O"oily liquid at 3'

J

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R

UJa.t-

8U.

!O

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 BO

X«

<^^



J08 Nfl : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WftTSCN ST. HOLE N»: 782-15

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED: Julv 21. 1982




GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION:_


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VA

TIO

N)

0 -

1-

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 •

6-

7 -


Tops oil




End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

V

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'0"

No odor

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R uja.t-

oou.\v>§a

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 80



JOB N* : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, VRTSCN ST.

9-1078HOLE N»: 782-16

DATE COMPLETED: July 21, 1982

CLIENT • Ve*sico* Chemical Corporation

HOLE TYPE • Split Spoon Sampling ____

LOCATION

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _St. Louis, Michigan TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION:

PROFILE

DEPT

H(E

LEVA

TION

)

0 -

1-

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6-

7-

8-


Topsoil



'• End of borehole

<eo

1

T

,- '

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'0"

Oily liquidbetween 3 ' and 5 '

SAMPLE

NUM

BER

£

BLOW

S / F

OOT

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

20 40 60 80

_*

^

]:i


STRAT1GRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT NAME :

JOB N» : ^_

CLIENT :

.FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM. WRTSCN ST.

9-1078_________________________

Chemical

HOLE N*r 782-17

DATE COMPLETED: July 21. 1982

HOLE TYPE : Spli,t Spoon Sampling

LOCATION : St. T-ouis.

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VATI

ON

)

0 -

1 -

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

-

-


Tops oil

Mixed sand fill - moist


-"^ Sandy clay - brown, moist ">NS-

End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

V

— H^v—^—

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 4*0"

N o odor

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R

£Oou.V.v>Io

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS / FOOT

20 40 60 BO


STRAT1GRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT NAME :

JOB N« : ____

FIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, VRTSCN ST. HQLE Ng. 782-18

9-1078 DATE COMPLETED: July 21. 1982




GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DEPT

H(E

LEVA

TIO

N)

0 -

1 -

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -


Tops oil

Mixed sand fill



End of borehole

STRA

TIG

RAPH

Y

V

1

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'0"2' to 4' fuel oilodor

»

SAMPLE

NUM

BER

UJa.u.X.w

ffl

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS / FOOT

20 40 CO SO

^

"*vf


PROJECT NAME :

JOB N« : ____

STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGFIELD INVEST. PROGRAM, WftTSCN ST. HQLE N,.__ 782-199-1078

CLIENT : Velsicol Chemical CorporationDATE COMPLETED: July 21, 1982

HOLE TYPE :

LOCATION : _

Split Spoon SamplingGEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _St. Louis, Michigan TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION:

PROFILE

DEP

TH(E

LEV

ATI

ON

)

0 -

1-

2-

3-

4 -

5-

6-

7-

-


Tops oil




—— —End of borehole ——————————— -

STRA

TIGR

APHY

v

••:•:•:•••:••

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2'6"

Very faint fueloil odor @ 4' to

•T-fc"

./

SAMPLE

NUM

BER Ua

i-

oou.\w

o

PENETRATIONTEST

BLOWS /FOOT

ZO 40 60 SOI

I


STRATIGRAPHIC AND INSTRUMENTATION LOGPROJECT NAMF , FIELD PI VEST. PROGRAM, M&TSQN ST. HOL£N«:______782-20____

JOB NS :_______9-1076________________________ DATE rnupig-Trp. July 21.

CLIENT : Velsicol Chemical Corporation_________

HOLE TYPE : Split Spoon Sampling____;__________

LOCATION : St. Louis. Michigan________________

GEOLOGIST/ENGINEER:

GROUND ELEVATION: _


PROFILE

DE

PTH

(ELE

VATI

ON

)

0 -

_•

1 -,

2 -

3 -

4 -

5 -

6 -

7 -

-

-

-


Tops oil

Medium sand - brown, moist .,



End of borehole

STR

ATIG

RAP

HY

V

!H!;,,:-

MONITORINSTALLATION

Water @ 2 '6"

4' to 51 fuel oilodor

)

SAMPLE

NU

MBE

R ug

8k.X.to

§o

PENETRATIONTEST

8 LOWS /FOOT

ZO 40 60 60

>•

.


APPENDIX D

ANALYTICAL G.C./M.S.

FOR SEPTEMBER 8, 1982 PROGRAM


117 N. First Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 (313) 662-3104

er

September 24, 1982

Mr. Rick ShepherdConestoga-RoversBox 876Oswego, New York 13126

Dear Rick:

As we discussed during our phone conversation of September 23, I havecompleted tabulation of the GC/MS data for your eight oil samples.Unfortunately, I was unable to get it typed today. 1 am thereforesending you a handwritten copy of the results, and a typed copy will bemailed Monday, September 27.

All samples except your ID 982-3 were prepared by skimming an aliquot ofoil from the sample and weighing out approximately 0.5 grams. Thisaliquot was then diluted 1:10 with methylene chloride and analyzed byGC/FID. This showed that the samples are similar to a number 2 dieselfuel. The samples were then diluted an additional 1:5 and analyzed byGC/MS. All components detectable in the samples were identified and arereported as percent of the total based on total ion current of the basepeaks.

Sample number 982-3 was mainly aqueous and was prepared by taking a 20gram sample from the top (taking care to obtain as much oil as possible)and extracting with 4 ml of methylene chloride. Analysis by both GC/FIDand GC/MS revealed no compounds present at a detection limit of 0,1 mg/Kg,

If you have any questions or if you require further information, pleasefeel free to call .

Sincerely,

FaasManager, Organic Studies

LF/cjEnclosurescc: R. O'Brien

Ann Arbor Chicago Cleveland San Francisco Minneapolis-Si. Paul

......tisl...... Now. -.r i (G Projec t #(1943September 27, 19(12

KRG Sample Number:Client III:

Compound

Saturated Hydrocarbons

r-9r - in'•11

';M

r'!fic?ii lnsalnrated Hydrocarbons

C9

C l l(-UcH

f-u

79340I IGW16-1

J%L

79341UGW16-2

0.971.31.8

2.51.83.2

0.700.742.54.45.51.59.84.04.40.620.40

79342I IGW16-3

J1L

1.24.9_..4.39.77.92.7--4.24 . 42.1----

1.31.11.52.50.726.12.55.05.04.82.70.260.48

_ _--—_ __-.--2.6--_6.9--_ _--

3.7

3.14 . 2

79343902.1

*L

2.0

79344982.2

JIL

3.5

1.4

79346782-5-1

_I*L

79347782-12-1

J£L

_ _1.41.0

11120.6_ _

4.65.83.04.16.22.80.50

—3.42.44.4

122.9__

5.67.27.5

15102.6--2.8

_ _----3.33.23.32.9

1.61.73.53.65.71.80.74

0.771.34.2

131.11.71.7

0.823.05.0--_ _3.1--

Conns toija HoversMM! PnvJiKt 08943September ?/, )<M2

F.IUi Sample Number:Client II):

Compound

Aroma t ics (continued)

phenylalkanes MW 204phenylalkanes MW 218phenylalkanes MW 232phenylalkanes MW 246phenylalkanes MW 260( 1 -me thylnonyl) -benzene( 1-methyldecyl ) -benzene(4-mothylphenyl ) phenylmethanonedecahydronaphthalenemethyl -decahydronaphthalenetHtrahydronaphthalenemethyl -tetrahydronaphthalenesC^-tetrahydronaphthal enesmethyl naphthalenesC^-naphthalenesC3_naphthalenesphenanthrenemethyl -phenananthrenesCjj-phenanthreneschrysene9ll-f luoreneC^-phenanthrenespyrene

MOVES:

All results reported as % of totalMW = molecular weight

79340UGW16-1

J*L

1.71.21.4----—--—0.420,52—1.61.61.84.0_ _0.911.8_ _—--_ _--

*

Sample Number 79345, Client II) 982-3: no

79341IIGW16-2

J1L

0.820.580.800.180.18—----0.140.?80.420.490.801.32.72.30.491.20.85—--0.38--

cop-bounds were

79342 793431IGW16-3 982.1

J1L J%L

._0.44

_-——2.1 0.654.6 1.00.75-__ _

0.871.62.05.25.8

2.34.9 0.94_.4.9 0.651.1

0.40_ _--

detectable with a de/ectlon

79344982.2

J1L

1.9—1.10.20—--——0.360.670.842.01.81.83.11.50.83--0.31_ _----0.10

limit of

79346782-5-1

J*L

1.7———0.601.01.6-__ _0.46—0.640.69—1.51.80.66_---—------

0.1 mg/Kg.

b

79347782-12-1

J L

0.79--—--—0.360.46—--0.540.282.4--...2.4--0.29--_. .----_ _—

11 ~11] REGARDING G.C./M.S. ANALYTICAL DATA

l

IIIIlli

APPENDIX E

GULF RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CORRESPONDENCE

R A. PlundoIE»«l»TH(f.- MANAGE"

P. O, Drawer 2O36Pittsburgh. PA

October 26, 1982Reference: 5-530TR80

Mr. J. Leslie GoodierPresearch Incorporated2361 S. Jefferson Davls HighwayArlington, VA 22202

Dear Mr. Goodier:

Our chromatography and mass spectrometry experts have evalu-ated the data you submitted with your letter of October 1, 1982. With afew minor exceptions we agree with the findings of the two other inde-pendent laboratories that the samples examined are diesel fuel/#2 fueloil. (These two names are often used interchangeably.)

Three of the five chromatograms prepared by the Rocky MountainAnalytical Laboratory are typical of those for diesel fuel. The boilingranges match, and the peak relationships match. The last two samples donot appear to be diesel fuel. Sample UGW-16-3C may contain highlyweathered diesel fuel, but it also contains heavier components, as shownby the large undifferentiated bulge on the right side of the chromato-gram, and by the increase in boiling range. It is possible to loselight components by weatherization, but it is not possible to gainheavier components, whose presence is verified by the 736°F end point.The fifth sample, 9982, is definitely not diesel fuel. It is too highboiling and has the wrong peak pattern (fingerprint).

Hydrocarbon compositionResearch Group via GC/MS analysesfuel. All components identifiedfound in No. 2 diesel fuel. Thecomponents (above C22), shown inratory. However, since the samp!between laboratories, we are not

data provided by the Environmentalare consistent with data from diesel

in the seven samples are typicallyGC/MS data does not show the heavychromatograms from the first labo-e numbering systems seem to differsure which samples are comparable.

O« SUL' OIL COBPOOATlQN

S

41 2 6*5' fiOOC

DATE 10/26/82 "«OM w. C. Picking TO Mr. J. L. Goodier SHEETNO

Charges for this work are $250. You will be billed by Gulf OilCompany - U.S., Virginia/North Carolina I&C Marketing. If you have anyquestions, please contact me. Thanks for the opportunity to be ofservice.

Very truly yours,

W. C. Picking

SUBSIDIABV OF GULF OIL 4 i 2 / 3 6 2 - i 6 O O

APPENDIX F

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES DATA

Rec'd CRA

PRESEARCH .INCORPORATED SEP ' ° 1982

2361 S . J E F F E R S O N D A V I S H I G H W A Y . A R L I N G T O N . V I R G I N I A 222O2 ( 7 O 3 ) 5S3-27OO

24 September 1982

Sidley and AustinOne First National PlazaChicago, Illinois 60603

Attention: James G. Archer, Esquire

Reference: Velsicol Plant, St. Louis, MI, Project No. 9-1113,Presearch Contract No. VEL-1__________________

Dear Jim:

Today I received a copy of the oil sample analyticalresults from Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory, they aremost encouraging. In brief, Sample 982-b-l(a) taken from theimmediate area of the pipeline is classed as the "sourcesample". This means that this oil is the closest to thenatural state. It is, however, aged and weathered and positiveidentification is not possible, but from it's boiling range, itcorresponds to diesels and kerosenes. With the exception ofSample 9982 Cw^ich I gained from a surficial, very heavy,sludge/oil pool in the the area where the 1,000,000/gal storagetank bottom was buried), the remaining three samples are allrelated to the source sample. There has been change from aging,weathering, evaporation and filtering through the sediments,and passage through the aquifer, but the analysis indicates thatthey are related to the source sample. This includes thesample taken from the site of the originally diked storage tankarea.

I understand that Rick Shepherd is sending additionalsamples to the Rocky Mountain Laboratory for analysis. Some ofthese samples were drawn from the SW corner of the plant at theedge of the river. It will be interesting to see if thesesamples relate to the "source sample".

I have learned that Rick exposed the 6 in pipeline andfound that there were two 6 in lines, one protectively wrappedand one unprotected and patched. I am awaiting Rick's reportof findings and photographs of the exposed lines. With theanalyses, Rick's findings and a response from Pat Lincoln toquestions raised in my first letter to you, I will shortly bein a position to formally report my findings.

P R E S E A R C H I N C O R P O R A T E D

I honestly believe that the situation todate looks verygood for Velsicol. Sample 9982, the tank bottom sludge, isnot incidently related to the source sample.

Very truly yours,

PRESEARCH INCORPORATED

J. Leslie GoodierSenior Scientist

JLG/lml

cc: *UPeter Gustafson Esq., Grand Rapids, MIDon Robinson, St. Louis, MO

w/copies of analytical reports

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

for

Presearch,Inc.

On September 15 and 16, 1982, five samples were received for analysis. The samples werelabelled as follows:

Sample Description Laboratory Number Date Received Type

99829-82-1CUGW-16-2CUGW-16-3C982b-l (a)

2210-012210-022210-032210-0*2210-05

September 15September 15September 15September 15September 16

OilOil/waterOil/ waterOil/waterOil/water

The samples were received under chain-of-custody. The original custody recordsreceived with the samples are attached.

Results

Chromatographic Comparison; The chromatograms of each oil or extract are shown inthe attachment. The top four chromatograms show an oil originating from the samesource. The chromatogram at the bottom shows no relationship with the top foursamples. Sample 982-b-l (a) appears to be closest to the source. Its pattern is completewith both light and heavy ends. The boiling range is approximately 350 to 696° F.Sample UGW-16-2C shows some weathering or loss of the light ends. There is excellentcorrespondence to the pattern in Sample 982-b-l (a). The boiling range is 385 to 696° F.Sample 9-82-1C shows the next best correlation. The pattern is complete but somevariations are apparent. The boiling range is a bit higher at ^21 to 696° F. Finally,Sample UGW-16-3C shows extreme weathering of the oil. The 'light ends, below C,2,are almost gone but the pattern In the top three samples is still present. The boilingrange is 488 to 736° F.

The last sample shown is a much higher boiling material. The boiling range isapproximately 488 to 825° F. There is no correlation with the patterns in the other foursamples. This sample is therefore of different origin than the others.

Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory 5530 Marshall Street. Arvada. CO. 30002 (303) 421-6611

The boiling ranges for Samples 982-b-l (a), UGW-16-2C and 9-S2-1C correspond to idiesels and kerosenes. Because of weathering, however, exact assignment is not possible.

Sample UGW-16-3C does not correspond directly with commercial refined cuts but fromthe similarity of the chromatograms as discussed above, it probably originated fromdiesel or kerosene. Sample 9932 does not correspond to any common refined CJts either.Its appearance is that of a tank bottom or residue.

Metals Analysis! Metals results and nickel/vanadium ratio are reported in the attachedtable. The results show no sound comparison of the samples. This is probably due to the ^ [nature of the samples where they have been moved through the aquifer, been mixed withwater and exposed to other minerals in the soil. )

Methodology -j

Chromatographic comparison; Three of the samples (UGW-16-2C, 9-S2-1C and UGW-ib-3C) had an oil layer and it was light enough to be directly injected onto a gas jchromatograph (GC). The other two samples could not be handled with a syringe andthey were extracted with a small amount of pentane. The pentane peak is apparent at Ithe start of the chromatograms. Boiling ranges were estimated by comparison to astandard of linear alkyl hydrocarbons analyzed under the same conditions.

Metals Analysis; Oil was recovered from each water sample by skimming the oil slickand removing the material. The oils were then diluted in xyiene and analyzed byinductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. Concentrations were based on the Conoco oilreference standard.

9/20/82

CHROMATOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF OILS AND EXTRACTS

1 -=• 0}

9826-1 (a) (2210-05)

UGW-16-2C (2210-03

9-82-1C (2210-02)

UGW-16-3C 2210-04

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

for

Presearch, Inc.

Client Description: 9982 9-82-1C UGW-16-2C UGW-16-3C 982-b-l (a)RMA Numberi 2210-01 2210-02 2210-03 2210-0* 2210-05

Parameter Units

Nickel/Vanadium ratio (Calc.) -Silver mg/kgAluminum mg/kgBoron mg/kgBarium mg/kg

CalciumCadmiumChromiumCopperIron

MagnesiumManganeseMolybdenumSodiumNickel

PhosphorusLeadSiliconTitaniumVanadiumZinc

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

mg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kgmg/kg

DetectionLimit

0.89.01.51.0

100.501.00.52.5

301.51.5

2002.0

0.50153.00.250.750.35

1.2NDND42

ND

950NDND2.0

2*

40ND2.3ND

18

NDND

200.3*

150.62

5.3ND

5610

2.6

60NDND

0.7178

NDND1.5ND6.9

ND7319

9.11.3

0.35

NDNDNDND

2*NDND6.5

15

NDNDND

, ND4.0

NDND1402.6NDND

12ND

4019

1.3

1200.762.24.237

ND1.85.2220

38

ND26

4203.83.2ND

ND22

NDND

29NDND

0.8733

NDNDNDND

13

NDNDND2.0NDND

ND means not detected.C

i1IiI1i1I11II

APPENDIX G

TOTAL PETROLEUM INC.

ANALYTICAL DATA

IIIIIIIlIiIIl

TOTALTotal Petroleum, Inc.

ONE DENVER PLACE SUITE 22OI 999 18TH STREET DENVER. COLORADO 8O2O2 TELEPHONE 303 «2B-2OOO

PATRICK A. LJNCOt_N. P.E.MANAGER ENVIRONMENTAL. AFFAIRS

Mr. John Rademacher October 8, 1982Vice President, EnvironmentalHealth & Regulatory Affairs

VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION341 East Ohio StreetChicago, IL 60611

Dear Mr. Rademacher:

I promised Don Robinson that we would share our laboratory results onthe samples collected from Saint Louis.

Attached are the results our laboratory obtained. I am sending a copydirectly to Saint Louis, since Don is anxious for the results and hasbeen calling for them.

You will note that the samples are high-boiling material, unleaded, andcontain negligable cracked products.

We would appreciate receiving a copy of your results.

Sincerely,

Patrick A. Lincoln/jwAttachment

cc:D. RobinsonL.R. ReinkemeyerC.E. FiskeW.J. VoreN.D. LaPaugh

P.A. LincolnTo: J-M. Rademacher10/8/82TOTAL LAB RESULTS ON SAMPLES FROM VELSICOL SITEPage 2

II. July 21, 1982 Samples:

Water samples from pit near boring 782-5 were not analyzed. There wasnot enough oil available for analysis.

Soil samples of 782-5 and 782-6 borings were analyzed as follows: Oiland grease were determined by soxhlet extraction of the soil sample.The other values were run on a distilled water extract, which was filter-ed prior to analysis. All values are on an as received soil basis.

Sample Oil &' Grease Cl Ca Mg Na ]No. (mg/kg)____ PH (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)

782-5 1(1 to 2 ft) 22. 6.9 840. 190. 6.9 81. J

782-5 ](5 ft depth) 39. 6.9 310. 300. 8.8 170. J

782-6 "J(just under Jtopsoil) 55. 7.0 520. 240. 7.2 60.

1 P.A. LincolnTo: J.M. Rademacher10/8/82TOTAL LAB RESULTS ON SAMPLES FROM VELSICOL SITEPage 3

III. September 8, 1982 Samples:

Total Petroleum received samples of water from pits dug at UGW-16-3,UGW-16-2, UGW-16-1, and 782-5-1, There was insufficient material in782-12 for a second sample and 782-8 showed no sign of oil, so neitherof us sampled that location. A hole was dug at the 2 million gallontank on 9/9/82 and a sample 982-1 obtained.

We were able to recover oil from samples UGW-16-3, UGW-16-2, and 982-1by centrifuging. The other two samples were not analyzed. UGW-16-1contained too little oil for testing any parameters, and 782-5-1 had

. "virtually no scum on top" according to the chemist. Distillationrange was run by GC because of limited sample size. The results ob-tained were:

UGW-16-3 UGW-16-2 982-1

API Gravity @ 60°F 30.0Specific Gravity @60°F (gm/ml) 0.876

Bromine Number 1.5Kinematic Viscosity

(cSt @ 100°F) 8.1Sulfur (wt %) 0.39Lead (ppm wt) 7.2Distillation °F (ASTM D 2887)

IBP 2975% 37610% 40820% 45730% 49740% 53450% 57460% 61870% 67580% 75990% 89295% 971FBP 1081

29.8

0.8772.1

8.80.439.3

3033924284845295676046456987789019831117

21.6

0.9240.5

220.0.7535.

402550615700766823878933993

1061117212431313

It. A. ».O-

October 29. 1982Reference: 5-S30TR80

Mr, J. Leslie toodlerPresearch Incorporated2361 5* Jefferson Davls KlgiwtyArlington. VA 22202

Dear Hr* Goodltr:Our Interpretation of analytical results produced by the Total

Laboratory on Maples fron the Velslcol site are as follows.

I. July 13, 1082 StaplesSaople 1 (Oil In pipe)

This oil 1$ too viscous to be No. 2 fuel oil.It could be a 30* oil. a blend of Mo. 2 and No, 6 fueloils* or any runfaer of other possibilities.Saaple 2 ((HI skfened frt» pit between UQMS I U&f*16)

Based on gravity *nd distillation* the oil 1s60-70% No. 2 fuel oil and 30-405 of heavier petroleunoil and reslduuB (crude oil bottoas).

II. July 21, 1982 SaaplesWork performed tells nothing about the oil or

grease, other than It 1s present in the soil at partsper vlllion levels. Other data appears typical forMter extracts of sol U

III. September 8, 1982 StaplesData shows that UGW-16-3 and U&M6-2 are nearly

Identical* Gravity and distillation data Indicate thestaples are 70-801 No. 2 fuel oil and 20-30% heavierpetroleoa oil. but no resl&njc.

Sasple 982-1 Is heavier than the first two sables.It contains approxiaately 25% weathered No. 2 fuel oiland 75% heavier oil plus residue.

O-l.

10/29/82 ,.0* V. C. PickingTS .- HS'"-?. -i>^ t-'-!"X*« "I

For your Infonwtlwi, typical boiling ranges for petrolei*are:

1. Gasoline (D96)2* Kerosene (D86)3. Ho. 2 P.O. (086)4. Lube (His (D1160)5. Residue* (D1160)

75"F to 425*F325*F to 550*F350°F to 680*F680*F to 1050Vt€60*F plus

The gas chnwtograpnfc -slaulated dlstniatlw procedure. ASTO 02^7always shows lower over points and higher end points than ASTM D86 orASTM 01160*

Charges for this worfc are $160. You will be billed by GulfOil C«**ny - U.S., Virginia/north Carolina UC Marketing. If you haveany questions please contact «e. Thanks for the opportunity to be ofservice.

Very truly yourst

|Tl C. . ...«. C. Picking 0

APPENDIX H

BOREHOLE LOGS

SEPTEMBER 19, 1982

AOGERING PROGRAM

I1

DATE -/r- rMICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS— LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION'ROJECT

.OCAT1C

:REW ct

i-i

[

1-

1•

.

Ii

GROUND WATtH OBStRVATIOW O* ENCOUNTERED AT ,^/ FT f

f^^^- / ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.— > / • S &&•''-, G.W AFTER COMPLETION -4^ FT tTT

J j* S9 S^" s* °'W' AFTCR HRS" ' FT-^1EF Z/O/^ V/ HELPER O-O^Tx^ a.w. uni UMES U**.«..^

Owpth

0

1

2

3

- ss

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

\ 25

iL*0«nd

-

\

>

D«pthof

Ch»ng»

P - - "

*•'"

MS

INS.INS.INS.INS.

Son DMcriptien / _Pcnmntion

( D*mfty, Moisture, Color, Tcxturi, me. ) Blow* /£"

-nPZo'i. j ———

•

""""" """'""*' 1 ———

£/*>J V f£s?A' ' V* •*-rc ' s s '

—— * ——— - — ; ————— 1"7 ' #**£ ff f~ £•'£> *-''~ m^ *^ ' y^--- . •1=-

————————— l=i.

_^ ————————————— |i

——————

1 t

\ "

i 1

D•

*J

1 0.QJ

'

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-OtSTUHBED U.L.-UNDIST. tINER S.T. - SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON B.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS


JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION'.HUJtL.1

.OCATIC

:REW aS*mpl«

• El«v.

hF•

L

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSN „.,._ .._, GW. ENCOUNTERED AT J? ff £-. ,N5

.---__ y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS._j >• , ~.&V'-ft M M- GIM AFTER COMPLETION ^ fT ^-r|NS

/ - _ ^ __ G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.•IIEF .,, , ^//Zf2^/ HP! PER ^ OX/"//C GW VOLUMES /S.->*,..is

O«Dth

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

e

.10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

10

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*e*nd/

Depthof

Ching*

/•C"

-?r / "

S'O"

.X" / /*» ^^ •* TSoil DMCriotion ^

P*n«tr«tion

( Dvntity, Moisluri, Color. T«xtur«, #te. ) Blowt/6"

Tr/fc-'i r ' *>

/*v;-".; . '.v,' /!>. -.'---^

————— 1^S~t/r'&, 5/:+sK /.t'.'*t<s'*s ^t ' 'r"

C />« \s (< /r/* ix y— -*<^ ' -• r? ——"ex i

F=

————— IE

———————— IE—

1——

———

n

I

1

ii

11

"JJ!jj

00

D.a>TD

"5

o

0)

O

0)01aCD

O

O

ffl*»•trt

j ;

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. -SHELB^ TUBi S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

1DATE

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS


JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

I PROJECT

LOCATIC

1CREW O

I I Sample

• "*

} VL- 1

1

1

L—1-1£ I

01 1

ML, 11 0-• rtj

«- -o

!lill• CD

oo

* of

1 4)

i**eo

i 1* a

1 £en•-

L.re,.

1

l-n

1i

1-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSW .,_ ,,., G.W ENCOUNTERED AT ^/ .'' FT X"" ,Nfj

__^ . G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.*!Tx""' X/VXX_T ,_ G.W AFTER COMPLETION -^T FT <— * ms

/ ^ G.W. AFTER ^MRS. FT. INS^IEF £//2tfV HELPER tf-Wf^. GW VOLUMES yx>. . ' - / VX

Depth •

0

1

3

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IS

20

31

22

23

24

•

L*e*nd Depthof

Cheno*

rl'C'-

4"e>«

£T (O

Soil Deccrtption / _Penetretion

( Dertstty, Moisture, Color. Texture, etc. ) Blowt/6"

y'jy/^S'o '

\

•

f*3tt&> w-^*V'0 X?/ "**^ .V ii'^.'f-^^ tS^

C//< V tf-/«e vx- x-^^ / c- •* —'4r

•

|

|

———

1 '

!

——— I

.,_.,.. J

———

1

! __ 1i

——1 —— !

• !

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO.

D.„ ^./s-.eaPROJECT

LOCATIO

C

m

00

0>

•O

cS£a0)

'I2§M«o

JDn*-OO

VCo

C

"a?!uaO)

11I.w

1EW Ct-

Etw.

1-

1

.£7,*=%

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS &*-"*! *• BORING NO. V>- •*•/*> — '

LOG Oh SOIL BORINGELEVATION .., , . .,

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSM G.W ENCOUNTERED AT _f. Cf v— )Nij

T / r G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.*"V ' ' *-O**/-i Q.w_ AFTER COMPLETION ^J BT £,|N5

} , - > * . SZ.r>tS,' ~- G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. ,NS.HEF / ' A,/? V ME1 PER C- '^ ^— G.W VOLUMES ^^ ^/^.y

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

B

0

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

2S

L-"a Dcothei

Ch«ng«

" t f ' '

3 , ^ <»ft5

^'0"

Soil DMcrlptlon /

( Otniity. Moiftur*. Color. T*xiu», etc. ) Btowi/6"

-V-'V ^^ •' —

\-^——————————————————————————— 1 ——r/rly i?/rcv /- fn'£ —

' ^'x , . .,^^ If ' /'///} *- /" ^ t A ri1-

!

———————— lEE——

___

————

:

————————— |E———————

——

t \f

1

11

rl]

J

1

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T,-SMEL6Y TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK, CORE OTHER-

1Di -L

I

MICHIGATE <"- •'•"---

ADJECT

OCATIC

CREW Ct

I ] Sampler1--f1 ii «!1

j |• ttJ 1

* * I*•] •£ I&P•ore •

Pi•

• **VT'

Ooli1 ?

i%

{ %I §

i!I ?

re

.

1-

1

^- ..

AN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS <£cr -7 -J. .

• OHING NO. 7 C ** *^^—LUG Oh SOIL BORING

ELEVATION .,.„_,. l—. — — .— ___ __ —— __ — — -— ——— -

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS»M ., G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT £ FT fo ,N5

.- ___ / ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. (Ng.~ "'^ '-*. G.W. AFTEB CnM^LeTlOIS) ^ FT ^- |NS

•• s~ G.W. AFTER HRS. FT. INS4\tf .-' '/;/- V HFIPER C=-^^^^- s.w .VOLUMI=«; j j . v * . . . .

Deptti

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

e

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

U^d Oeoth01

Change

/Y-"

J"6"

5-t>»

Soil Description /

( Dentttv, Moinurt, Color. Ttxture, etc. ) Blowi /6"

i

f

=fulff ^ ^ .__ __ i

——__

''^•s- j" ' 1

j

———

———

;1

——————

—

i

i

.

•

D

PI

L

MICHIGATE 7 -/£"-£"

HOJECT

OCATIC

CREW Cr

!

i*m»l*Elev.

-

• r— r

*a«.£F£01

ia**00;g

Sta

rt ta

king

rou

tine

pene

tratio

n te

st

II

I-———

1

<T,,c

AN TESTING ENGINEERS.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

LOG OF SOIL BORING/

N

4IEF /- / /U, V HFI PER ^- ^/-:/—

O

1

a

3

4

6

6

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

1ft

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

—— Depth Soil Deccripiionof

Change ( DentrTy. Moifturn, Color. Tex

/ /,£"'

2 '$"

*'**

^/ •?t*r-Z* £ * i—

s-S-^. :>;,../; xjr,.v.*^

^-^. <r.w/> ,-^-^^

INL. JOB NO

BORING NO. ^£" •*•' /*T "

ELEVATION „ ,

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

a.w. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT. ^ INS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION V (=T. ^" INS.G.W. AFTER ^HRS. "~ FT. INS.G.W. VOLUMES -Ax.^/^'-.X

Penetretionture, etc. ) Blowt /6"

S~?f •' .' ^~

^ __ " —————

^1

1

i

r/^y «S>VV ,w^/-r-

' ^ &.'*„*

•—————————————— | ——

f^ *--<•- m1—

:

1

]

:

—— T.I

t1

__

—————i-

::i!ii

j

|j

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LINER S.T. - SMELflV TUBE S.S.-SFLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE "~<rr *»MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS_ LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

•ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW cSemple

_ El«v.

"1-^

11-f11

1^1

*—. ,r- ' . ———————————————— - ——————————— .GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

1M .„ B.W ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT ^T? ,N5

,-._,- / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. (NS.•^^ ' ^-ELS/5 __ GW AFT** COMPLETION 2 " ^^ INS

/ ^ s-s*^f* G-w- AFTEB HRS- FT. INSÎEF ^//:Sl V WPI PER Cô/^f>c- ^ Q w VOLUMEfi /-^^^Depth

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

B

B

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

LM Depth Soil De*cription / .,_f ' Peoetretlon

C*»eng» ( Density. Moisture. Color. Textun, etc. ) Blows /S"

/ •£»

3<c<>

*S v

I7rV^'^^'-

s~-js'/>f <r-»j^ •' -'*: y <,.* 'jGi*~-**' '• * r- —~

————————— 1=fl**£'0< /•? trâs'^x &>fvj f_~,*^*-*~-'^ -^ -. T-

JZi^>s? £-. <^t/ £

'*'/? ',' {?•'; 7- V /-/&.'£.? ——

' Jr"^ <£ ' /^V/> /? //^ i /"

—————— 1^1

—

;

———

—————————— fe——

i___ j

\ ——I ——

CO

-cZ

1 *j C* O)

CLQJ

*D

T5

ocV

1 8l ;g (0f fc,1 *riI I

i %\ *I ro• +*

S

DATE


__ LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

. BORING NO. •' -T

ELEVATION»ROJECT

LOCATIC

;REW ci-

I-

1

^ , / . —————————————————— .GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

N „ __ Q-W ENCOUNTEH6D AT "Z ST <O ,NS

,-- — — y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.

/ ^ ^ _ G.W. AFTER HBS. FT. INS.t * ^ j ^ y^ .A. \x * t * PH p^ i_^^Td/ ** jf^m / /1IEF , *-Sf^s.f y HFi pf p *— *^K«=- A«. ^ w v/OLU"PS -^K- -^ . . i .

D«pth

O

1

2

3

*

6

fl

7

8 •

B

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

IB

IB

2O

21

22

23

2<

25

L^<of

/ <C'->

? * O ' '

*•

Sol" Pncrlptlon /

( Dtnsrty, Moijturt, Color. T*xtur«, «te. 1 Blowi /6"y^£/y£T& t £• j

i/"7/f^ • JTV»*/£ tLrf?~+s '• '-~>--^~

—————— Pf-tStC-C -~, < \ i

<_ • N

Jf /ss~'-f> * s~- /.•'.•?-'. m i|

i

————— ————— fe

—— >

———

1—1—

i—•—

i

i-i

!'!3.111

00

V

outin

e pe

neak

ing

S

I

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBEO U.L.-UNOIST. LINEft S.T. - SMELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON B.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-



JOB NO.

8ORING NO.

ELEVATION'ROJECT

LOCATIC

;REW oS»mpl»

— El«v.

L—g

11

1-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS*K| _ . , _ , G W ENCOUNTEBeo AT ^ FT.Or* 1NR

— _ y _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT __ FT. . •• (NS..>/ r *— •-'OX. , _ G w APTER COMPLETION - FT -~ )NS

/ ,-- , ^ _, G.W. AFTER HRS. FT. INS•IIFF ^"C^V HFLPER wJ-^^J-x-— Gw. VOLUMES T.-C .,,,,,

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

18

20

21

22

23

24

L"""' OfChcnp*

<?„

3't'"

S'f

Soil OvKription / -

( Diniitv, Motcturt, Color. T«xturt, «tc. ) Blowt /6"

x-^--~-- ^ ___ |,*•,-/ ') ' .,* •/*> ') !'. :' '- x-V-- S* ' ' •' —• '

:

^ - __ i/'**£•/;, ^/ZfJ.O /", ± ^•-'/-S .'•->;- / !

_j

- ;x / X/V /.^^x xu x,*? -'j 7 —4-* tr'^Z ;r ,^s* •1—

!

| ——— 1

——— 1t

•j

——— ,

!

___ I

I *ii— i—i ____ ;

00

V

•oeB

I -I °-I ^

^

II\

I

I11

ca

D)

TO*^CO

DATE


__ . LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

• ORING NO.

ELEVATION

P /V - / L,

'RDJECT

LOCATIC

:REW cvS*mp<«

1=1-

i

h

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOHN _..„ e.w. ENCOUNTERED AT _i FT C

„,-— i—— . / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.— >.X . ^-S*t''S'*5 __ G.W AFTER COMPLETION —— FT £!

/ _ ^ ^. O.W. AFTER HRS. FT.1IEF /-"tZ/'sy HFIPER L-—&t/*C/£> QW VOLUMES 4-.-. /, ^

0

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

.

B

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

L^o«/

O*c> th

Ctiangt

//r*

3-c"

•

IS~«""" INS.

INS.INS.INS.

Sell Dncrlption

( Dvnsitv. MoiHurt. Color. Taxtun, rtc. t Blows /B"7J"w'; , —————— 1=/^^ <, a /?,^^,, ^.r- —

\

11

I y.,. i

——— i——— i

i—i———————— tE|

——

I—

.13]3]

^"k.

.

1JI!)

00

a01•o"5

o

(O

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. - SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

Ii DATE



JOB NO. _____________ __

O.JT •? • " / IBORING NO .- £.- •."* X^ "" / /

ELEVATION __.._._______>ROJECT

LOCATIC

DREW Cr

El*v.

tL11i

•

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONStM Q.W. ENCOUNTERED AT "^ FT ,NS

^^^ y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.

^X^« ^£f£^jt^ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT t> IN<>

J /f sy ^* G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.•II EF X J*,*?y WFI PER Cf~GP&4C- „._ G.W. VOLUMES ,^-^L- y-

Dvoih

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

L^d D.cth Soil Omrlptlon / P.n«r.non

Ch»n9* ( Density. MoiRurt. Color. Texture. «te. 1 Blow* /B"

£"

•S-9"

W

"7~D^^*O '*•S^r^fL \ i^fi,' f^. *^ f*tfsA'^S /•>/* £' ^tr* s\^s ,4- .•£."* • *~ "^"~ r

'

!;

____/ ^v, .r- , , i————————————————————— 1 —£if*\J /-^ A •/;••' V" / -.-T ' — >

' / '

^ {»' # "L> o f- ,~c- i '- •I—j——— ji • i

Ii ——

I ::•

————

' ———— |i

j!

1

——

•

00

I *

f £

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION _

ROJECT

.OCATIC

REW oS«mDl*

_ Elwr.

h1-h1-

1-

i-i

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN _.,,, e.w. eweoMWTSBSo AT *? *j <^> 1^5

•^ —— y*. ;> <• G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT "T FT. __ INS.-'/' y 4-&L/S _5 . ^ G.W AFTSBCOMPLETIOW _£ CT *— J ,N5

y . X f - ^ SZ^VJtS* O.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.4IEF 4-J&t*y HPLPER C-O^^/S a w VOL.IMM _,//-., , ../

D*pth

0

1

2

3

4

5

«

7

B

B

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

18

20

21

22

23

24

25

/L»g«nd O*eih

ofChing*

/•*"

3 -0"

&'*"

•

Soil D ••crip t ion 'P*n«tr«tion

( D»n»itv, Moitturt. Color. Tixturi, «tc. ) Blowt/6"

-rz>/3£.s'±

/WA ^.r'f't'^ tli-xV. tvV -*- '»3 .r ""

——————— |E/V7/?£> ' Srfsjt &/?&£>"J l^f *""

I~-J__

c'^y <^x-'<r v 'A-T'^''-=; — i1 i! 1—!

r^ x A//I; O ^" & ^^ *-& •

•|

i1

—————————————————————————— j

\ !

I Ii_1! 1

1

-

—————————— I1

——————

1 I

j ______

M

CO

•o00

s

O)

(B»*CO

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDlST. LINER S.T.-SHELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW Cl| SampUL- Elw.

r'

*•*IIJSre

OOi*-Vco

s*"<1IIaw

fC

re

to

1tt

1-Hln™

1•

1•

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS1W .,. , G.W ENCOUNTEBEn AT %> FT G |N5

- . J G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.-* S ' £&tJ/~ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT t£=>

)NS

/ ^- /~ f, _ G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INSHIEF >-/' 'i.X HELPER C-C •/TXI B.w vot UMES A/--.-,.,vx

D«ptn

0

i

' 2

3

4

6

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

•

L"""1Depth

0*

/ '0 "

3-D"

Sol' Description ' f

( Dcntttv. Moinuri, Color. Tvxturt, etc. ) Blows /G"

•Tsv-s.*-*- ———

/~yj?& • _5«0'v£ to/Ctf^*-^^^ ^-r ."3 '— >~ I—————— ^f?£$i 5#fJ% &£*&&/*/ L*JS* 7""~

fjs^-t. & * *- Af •' *y ' £*J£ & /^- +Jr £.£ fl

1_

—————— f^—————— 1

—.

—

———————————— tE

—11———•

i

i

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION _

'ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW cf••mot*

11

1-1

1

I-1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSM _ ff,^ f wcrou"TB«ep AT -^ *T ^ 1N5

^* - / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT . ^ FT. |NS,->X " ^"PiJ •' £ _ ___ S W A*Te« CO^'l-CTlOw ^r BT •^ tNS

/ o , -- _ > O.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INSHEF J-'f'sA. V HELPER -^^ X^A^ e w Uftl .,„« x '.-. . . .

O»pth

0

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

B

B

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1B

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L^

tDvetnof

Chano*

/<£"

3'$"

Soil Description /•

( Dtniity, Moicturn, Color. Tvxtur*. etc. 1 Blow* /6"

Tcy^T^-'i-

/< -r ? -v^ o .'„. . -. .AX /<- T ' - -r—

j•

Aff.O/ £,Jf<sA &>£G*SS~/ s^sr^. j»/£dr , I* ^"X%<^ IP/ J&4-C/? •

|

1B1|

————— -fe—

——————————————————————————————————————————————————— - ——————————— S

I———I

———

••

•

—B—

*

J

VH

UN

W

*•

~^a

j•-»

t-•D

V

tt>aa>c

O

Ol

TO**CO

TYPE OF SAMPLE: 0.-DISTURBED U.L.- UNDIST. LINER S.T. - SHELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-


DATEGEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

. BORING NO.

ELEVATION

1 PROJECT

LOCATIC

IC

IIK

REW Cl

El*v.

'

1 • t1 CD •

0)

I*,'\I °-1 °*I T5

TO

lUV

OO

liIS|!• Q.

w

1!1

Ifrar|

1-

1--

h11—

i

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN _ ._ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT. ^ IMC

^ __ / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ""' FT. INS._^^-* sZ-^^'Z G.W. AFTER COMPLETION *? FT ^^ ^5

y - >, G.W. AFTER HRS. FT. INSHIEF Xx ^XSV * HELPER A?i/^x« G.W. VOLUMES ±J",i,, ix

Dvpth

0

1

a

3

4

6

6

7

B

&

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

26

Lwn° *D«pth

of

"•*'

? '^ ''

S'3"

'"

Soil 0«cription ' P.n.tr.tior,

( Otntitv, Moirtur*, Color. Tcxturt, »tc. 1 Blows /6"

TS^- ' -

>*-?>T5- -i-J-v^ ^.^:^^-^ *-» / i r —

««. r/y.^J «4T**.^ tcx/ry ———

1_' 'i 1T» •

7*6*^ £*•'£ C/~ /rffeg, ' I

1-•

•*.

—

—

————

i1 1— 1

DATE


_ ' LOG OF SOIL BORING

JO6 NO.

BORING NO. 7iff.V/r "/tf

ELEVATION ^____________"ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW DSwnpl*1 El**.

1-

k

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOfiIN GW ENCOUNTERED AT ? PT, -£Z

4***— / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.—— •/ - £.£^/-S G.W. AFTER COMPLBTinN J1 CT ^!

y .*- xC>-»/X^- •*• G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.4IEF /*/te&V HPIPFR C^7f^T^ a.*. vmuMM i-/. -.....,,

Dwth

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

ft

10

11

12

13

14

IS

1C

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

U*Md Dwtthof

/ '*"

ye"//< t"

f - * f r .

ISINS.INS.

? INS.INS.

Soil QMcrtption / -P«n«tr«ion

{ Dvntitv. Motitur*. Color. Tcxturt. «tc. ) Slows /B"

x .'- / -1 * •' «*

/'Vn>- ±*i'J& £^+ -.*s*S s'/-^'C~

HFfl '-Pv/> /''"' • --^ ' /r -r-

1 ^1

,&'&**£> &S- s-*a££

——————— 1——————— 1

-

^

————

I-

00

V

a)a

09*-(O

']]]D:i'i.1

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D. -DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. - SHE LEY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-


IDATE

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

BORING NO.

'ROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW ClSemple• Elev.

1 —————

FHr

1-

1

1i

1

3 - /£T / 1 ————————————————————— - —————————— —— i..-GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOr

IN ..„.,_. ,.™ fi.W. BWCOUNTteiEB AT *? FT ^T

--,__ /^ G.w. ENCOUNTERED AT ^( FT._i. / , X-*r'- '' — . Q.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^' PT,«^

1 3 SJ /* SS^jT G-W' AFT6B HRS fT

^IEF /- A^V HPIPER (rOW^- a.w. VOLUMES . .,.Depth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L-nd

fDepth

ofChange

J<t>'-

2-D"

S-o"

JS

INS.

INS.INS.INS

Soli Description / .Penetration

( Density. Moinure. Color. Texture, Me. 1 Blows /6"

-TV/'-tott.

*-'*•#. .. -O <3/cV^4^*o- f- sr.f^s-^ I

'.

W0.S*»o /->v.^ ts*f- ——

7 '4,7 '^- ,, j —p—————— 1

1-•

—l-l

CO

*

'

ion

teou

tine

pene

akin

gt

tak

S

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-OISTURBE D U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. - SMELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION _'ROJECT

LOCAT1C

:REW aSamel*

.. Elw.

1-

1

P

1-

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSM ,.. G.W. BNCOUNTEItep AT f2- fj ^1 ,N1

__ / ^_ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.•"TV. ,i-.iV''_> _ G.W. AFTF.H COMPLETION pL, FT, ^ (N5

J ,? •» . ." . O.W. AFTER H«S. FT. INS4IEF X /*•-''• HELPFR r— J-'/ VcI. G w voi LJMS« //,.. ..

0

1

2

3

4

S

B

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

^^Depth

ofChino*

,'•&";="c"3-D"

Soil DMcripTion *Fcncimion

( Density. Moitturf, Color. Taxtura, ate. ) Blowt/6"

"77'/^5^>i.

**^/^" -1 C~ J* A '*-, s • *• ji > <x~— - '/*"* ' ' 7* ^

"^^ '"f*"' *"'"' "*' """

, |

; "1

———— N

——

————————————— M————

———————— 1=—————

——

1—

11

"]3]E

*s33

00

Ol

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-D1STURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. -SHELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT S^OON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

1D

1 -L

MICHIG<^_ ' T _ t." ^iTP / •- -

ROJECT

OCATIC

CREW a1 S*mpl«I L ....1 pj

1 I1 "11

\

i

!••!' -1 GO

0) 1

'i*!

**&•°is11{ sI "* •-•oo

hJ 0

V)O)

i =* .2*re

1 0

£aa>c

t =1 s01

ll1 ^* »Jk,«ri

1

hiW

1-,-

*' x

AN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS BOB1NG NQ 9*^ _ ,LOG OF SOIL BORING

ELEVATION; , ___ —————————— - —————— - ———————————————— . ——— ——— ,

GROUND WATER O&SERVATIOI^J _,., , GW. ENCOUNTERED AT FT

.— ___ , _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.— ' - f ^--'- "'' ^— . ..__ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT

/ ^ -• -. ^ G.W. AFTER MRS- FT.JIFF ^ / S^S-'y HELPER LT0 »<£s~ _ _ GW. VOLUMES A>^AJ^

O«ptti

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

L*p«nd

'

sO«pTt1

ofCh»n»B

/'^"

-

4/'^ "

SIS

INS.

INS.INS.INS.

Soil DMcription _P«n«tr«ion

( Dwnrty, Moiiturt, Color. T«xtun. «c. ) Blowi/6"

7^" •^•^/i-

/'IgD. £r*v£> jJ2s&'t~'*' s>— '&'*,/—————— IE* " 1'&'£*£ £/=- /7ki~£ J

•11

——————— 11—————— 1=|

————————————— tE

j i

———— : ————————— _. —— _... J i

DATE



JOB NO.

) j ••• OWING NO. T-^P-'A - »CT

ELEVATION _________'ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW CrSample

_ Elev.

h

1-

^

1-

i

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONIN ..... <?«* ENCOUNTERED AT ' *J —

(-_i__ / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT __ FT. ^.— '•> ' * .'-^tS'S^ ,_ GW AFTER COMPLETION ..; PJ ""

/ - , xi x- , G.W. AFTEW ,HRS. FT.«EF ,— .'x:./W HFIPPR t"^>/ <. ew VOLUMES * -•• „ . , v x

Death

0

1

2

3

4

8

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

10

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*9*nd/•Death

ofChinpft

/ '£"

3'G"

y-c*1

IS

INS., INS.

INS.fNS.

Soil Description • Brtrntritlon

(Density, Mo«turt, Color. Texturt, etc. ) Blow*/6"

•73/=»£^ '.'

**^O- ^X/v^ to/."sr^* / ''—• *• •• r T~

__

—————— N/^/ <; !>•- ^/'S-Si^ /> /•• Z-^SAJ -*•' - - ~ i

| ———— -

I 1*

,V^'^^^> -/= >>.v;. J

•11

————— 1N

—1—B

——————

———————— tEi

——

I-H

)]

:i'i3333

"3:ii

i

00

o

1

0)c(Ua

01

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-D1STJRBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SMELBY TUBE B.S.-SPLIT S^OON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

IDATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO. *

ELEVATION

IROJECT

uOCATIC

:REW ctS*mpl«

_ El«w.

I——•

L-

\-t1

1-

h

I

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSiw ,. „„, .. G w. ewmiJNTEAsn AT *v FT, CJ3 ,N5

^ ___ ' , G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT , FT. . ( INS.-— '/ ' f~£:»' J _ _ GW APTEB COMPLETION .- -- *T, "-- ,NS

/ .XVl. /2."jXtx- G.W. AFTER .MRS. FT. INS.•1IEF *~ ' -^ y" WFI PPR &*•' *"•'<<-. G.W. VOLUMES ,', " -,'-y W

O«Pth

0

1

a

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L-""' Dvothof

Ch«nj»

''*"

2'o"

Soil Description ' .P*n>tntion

t D»nthy, Moicturc, Color. Ttxturt, «tc. ) Blows /6"

~7'Ff*'^.T'—

rt^Q -sf-vM / - -T. j-/,-.v ,-•- '-•• ." •" "? —

- ——————— : ————— 1

=!^\

\

——i•——

IIj

fl.I*CO

V

IJI*^a

I E1 io>

I*1 0.s

b_

I w£n

I


DATEGEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

LOG OF SOIL BORINGBORING NO. X <--J

ELEVATION

'ROJECT

LOCATIO

:REW a-Sample

1-

1-

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSM ., G.W. BNCOUNTERCD AT "^ PT, ^INS

-r-_^— y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.—— - -^ . ^_ /5 *V*_ G.M< AFTEB COMPLETION ^ fj £3 |NS

y •* j^ /" ^ Xx- * G'w- APTEP5 HRS. FT. INS.*IPF /•/tf'Zy HELPPR te*—S/;<4.f O.W.WOLUMM L/+*^.^,

Dwth

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L""n< ofCh»nf)«

/'*"

3 'D"

S/'C*

ST"

Soil D»*cripilon 'P«n«mtion

( Dimity, Moiituri, Color. Ttxiun, «e. ) Blows /S"

7>^s:^^ ———r-JKb. S*+~& £frt,*.+* —IctLs

/ '>£-y5/ S^y 'Z) (££** ***** b*S*?~S \\— '

^"/A1 V ^>'X - 1^^7.-. -/) ,,u./r /;-T-«#r

£if / >v- -/i ^ /^- j+-^t*> ^ S •F1

1 -

i1

i >

1—1

——

—

———i—

ii

3J

1

00

0)

&

esou

tine

pene

akS

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.—UNDIST. LtNER S.T. - SHEUBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

1 DATE «£__ /."" - & £»



JOB NO.

• ORING NO

ELEVATION .

>ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW CFSample. Eiev.

FhhI1^pr

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIM iw_ni G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ">' FT ^ .uc;

^- ___ / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT , PT. INS.•^'- ' ^-3±JS£ ^ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^- FT ~ tNS

/ ^, ^- G.W. AFTER ,MRS. PT. INS.J ff F A ' ' 't. y H E I PE R «^» X«=X^ _ G w_ VOLUMES .-:T'X>ty W

Death

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*e«nd Depthof

China*

/• 0"

-/'<?"

S'S"

Soil Description _Penetmlon

( Density. Motftur*. Color. Texture, etc. ) Blows /6"

X^/^-^T^'^-

rt££. S"^A/^) /£/J+i~'*' s-i£'-- —

————————— P1 _ |i i

__€*>'' v. grS/Z is /T~*£>/ «5. 7 —

' /V ^ ' £*'£> t/~ tJ&C£ •

•|

—————————— 1=

I I!!

1 i———___ i

———————————————————————— _ — ——————————— ,

———————— 1=m, ——— '1 1

i i

... .., - ... i j

—————————————————————————— JZ !• i• i

IVf

u1**V £

1 £I T)

1

0)cO)av

"•530

0>

2ra

to**to

•rvDC nc ei ii i-— UNDIST LINER fi T --RHti BY TiiBP «: e _«n tT «S*noN B r _«nr>c rnBP OTHER-

0

pL

MICHIGiTp t-s5-£3*

ROJECT

OCATIC

CREW C*I SampUL El«v.

r

.*a*,> !

•D •

1CL0)•o

c 1

i|0)

oto**OoVcotn*«

C.2*-2•*gVQ.«

»*

O

_cn*->«-<k.to*-

I-

I-

11

1

*•. i -

AN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS .OR,NG NQ 9BM-ZLU(J Uh SOIL BORING

ELEVATION

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSkM .. G.W EMCOUNTERED AT 'T' FT C? |NS

____ j f. ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. (NS.5^ ' X-/-*''-- __ G.W AFTER COMPLETION -1/ FT, ° INg

^ ,S?S>U ^./S* «~ G.W. AFTER HRS. FT. ,NS.<IEF S~/r^szf \s HEI PPR u- ^^^ /«^ aw VOLUMES AJ^tS,, \s

o

i

• a

3

4

5

6

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

IB

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L~nfl

fDepth

ofOtsnga

/' T »

ft "

5'c"

Sell OMcription ' .

( Dcntity, Moictun, Color. Tcxtun, etc. \ Blowt /6"

T'^.^-S^ / ^»

A"^fO. Jtv-7/v.O //,'-"£• wv /~*£>s£T~

.

*-*"~ ***"*"* '""* *-***'" *-**' —— jzzj1 .. , 1 -. — —

J1

- M.

—

———————— lEE————

————

——i

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LtNEH S.T. -SHEL.BY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE -



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

'ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW ciSemple

1r

tk

I

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOrIN _..,.,„.,. .,..__ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT "3 *T *"

c-_r_ / „ O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT _ FT.^^ • •— i£*-/-'— ___ Gw AFTER COMPLETION ^ PT C

t , j _s~ .^s- if G.W. AFTER HRS. FT.-MEF ^ /e/_ Y HELPER iS-^X^vC. Gw VOLUMES MJ-S,. , *S

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L-","Death

ofChange

/'C"

2,p-<

C'C"

- r - -—— f

JS

=> .NS.„ INS.* INS.

INS.

Soil Description _Penmetion1 Density, Moisture, Color. Texturt, etc. ) Blow* /6"

-rtr-^-'L.

Wz&f 5''7*/£ £,£&t*"*s s-r& ' s-T^

/•*}£$! 7~3 ££**3/f£*£i ^f-'*1/} fcf-~£'^f'^ f *- ~

C /X^V L^/L £ ' V /-*r&s£*F~/ / t

————————————— 1

•1H

i

i.

00

I1

1 0

?Ql

a

rn

I

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.DATE


JOB NO. ____

BORING NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW D

Elw.

I»r01

1

I1"1

f(B

O

V

Oa

OO

0)

O

I

Sta

rt ta

king

rou

tine

pene

tratio

n

1-

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATtQftK| .._ , G.W_ tNCOLJNTSREQ AT ^5 BT ^

—__„- / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT _ FT.•~> / * £&£*/•* " m| _ G.W. AFTER COM^LCTIrtW —— 1 *T ^

/ /?^J /^/StSS*^' G.W. AFTER ,HRS. FT.41EF j-/f9ff£y HELPER ^ &*£?*£ G w vni uutEft ^-^>- ,.^,>

Dwth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

e

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

IB

30

21

22

23

24

25

• — , Depth0*

/ *C "

3-c"

S'c-

ISINS.INS.

•"* INS,INS,

Soil Dncflption fP«netretion

( Dtrwttv. Moisture, Color, Texture, «U. ) Blown /6"

•y*^jfc./A

rtffb. £rf*s£ /?,&'±~>*j /i*i&/s^-——

•

HM-rc r~A-,- <-• A ,?^^ /.'/»—— ———

K- ^——————————————————————————————— ___ ———————————————————————————————————————— • ——————

Cite £-&*? , A^/C ' *- / •

— • —— i —._^ — —— i

^——— 1

—————

,

I s

—————

—————

—

0

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON Pi.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

IDATE -yg* gp



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION _PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

i£

*ID

'EIoo

"oo«fc.

V,

REW CSampl*

-\-^*rn —————*ri

0)

n.0)

*^O_ 1Ol 1

1*- !

rID

1I

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS•? JP«II•JW _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT — FT. <^> (NS

__—_,— f G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS— ' X ' £•&&'£ __ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION 5 FT. C"> tu<;

/- — , G.W. AFTER HRS. FT. INS

f f £ & y «FIPER &~*lS<C^ G.W VOLUMES >d^,^/vyD*ptti

0

1

2

3

4

s

e

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L^n*e

Of

XV"

2-o"

Sail Description / -

( Dtntttv. Mowturt, Color. Tcxturt, «te. ) Blow»/6"/73/ ij>;» |

/*•/>?£• £&*£ £ /r^-us*s s--r& t*-. -?—

^&. &~i> a**u,~ ~'^ ——•^ • __^ 1

i

——————

| ______

———

TYPE OF SAMPLE; D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LINER S.T.-SHEL8V TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-



BORING NO.

ELEVATION .

L* t -

PROJECT

LOG AT! C

CREW Cl1 Sampli

\V

m

'

<*aO>

.1!o

oowCoyw

Jre

Ca>O.

0)

1

I2rreCO

1

h

I1

I1

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIO*«U GW. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT ^

tr^s__ /^ ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT _ ? FT. „— ' -" ' —— *"V- ' -" G.W. AFTER COMPLETION .JL- FT *~

y „ _ — G.W. AFTER .MRS. FT.^IEF >i '/'^?V HPl PPR :-.-r>iX*fr"xi GW VOLUMES ^tAr^i.ji*

D«pth

0

1

2

3

4

fi

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*9*tld ' *T

/'£"

3'&-

Z'C"

IS^ INS.

. INS.INS.(NS.

Soil DMCripiion / „Pcntmtton( Dvnstty, Moirturf, Color. Tixiurt, «te. ) Blows /6"

~r^'f-.'-f- '+•

^£2, £sts,2 /i/-'r.*--v >•—•'.-" 2-

———————————— P

/ ' /CV^^? ^ /" ^~&t-£

——— s ——————— 1——————————— 1

i ———————————————————————————————————————————— _ ——— B ————I

1

——————————— 1——i

i

I =I s

,~.e-r . tucn e T - C M P I B V TLIRP «: c _«;*i rT SPOON R C -POCK CORE OTHER-

DATE 9- >C - £MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS_ LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION'ROJECT

LOG ATI C

SREW OSample

- Elev.

*-

Nhi

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS)M ,.,._, ,. G.W ENCOUNTERED AT — f-r^> .Nr;

_ f G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT -^- FT. INS.,5x /• ^.^ i-'.' ~ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION —— > ff, <^ )N<;

/ X- . G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS41EF j-J&S'.y --HPLPER *Jr«^<iv<C o.w VOLUMES >^/-. ,>...>

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

.

0

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IBi

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Legend Depthof

Chenge

/>£>•'

3'°"

Soil Deccrlpilon > .Penetretipn{ Dentitv, Morcturi, Color. Texture, etc. ) Blows /B"

•7Z>^£& st~

f?<:£' ^s/~S> /£,-,-.*"*-'• X- '£' - "^

M».^~0 &^*~~ ' m~.. ———— ]

I V1

—————— 1^off<T7

=31

——i

-

————r

———

B —

•£toO£Vco

esak

S

]

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

• BORING NO

ELEVATION

"ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW aEl«V.

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSM ,,. 0 W. SNCOUNTERED AT ^ FT -=> (N?

^ / ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.— / • ,/.&&.' i. .. ' Q.W AFTER COMPLETION 3 FT & tNS

/ , , ^- G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INSUEF 2-*i-*tS.y HELPER - e- .4* : owi v/n.uMes ^1 .*., ., i^

O*pth

0

1

2

3

4

B

0

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

1«

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L~n" D*ethof

Chine*

I-L,"

3'°"

5'B"

S - - - r - ' f

Soil Oneription ' _

( Dtniity, Moisturt, Color. Tcxtun, «te. ) Blows /6"VrxSe/4

y^yZJj -H'l^Zi /StV'Cta**-xV f*lC* t i7^"———— ^^>-,>' .£- ^^^) «xsst«^ M/* /_ ———

^

^/x? y trTi'' *)'' ?*•**? £tt —T™"i

1

—— -,—

31

————

| ————

t ____

i

——

t

j ————

£

jw

00

a«>•oTo

O

«g.O

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT S*»OON R.C.-HOCK CORE OTHER-

I MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. IHC. JOB NO

DATE


BORING NO ' - .v X' - ~

ELEVAT1ON

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW C[ SimpleL- Elev.

1

I" i • .IT" t r- —————— — — - —— • — - — —— — —

•JN . , __ ., , „ ._

HIEF - •'"•• "• '- HELPER .. -~-' •''>' ---^-Depth I Legend | D«DT^ Soil Datcription

j ! 0*0 i | Chenge ( DensiTv. Moinur*. Color. Tex

GROUND WATERG.W ENCOUNTERED ATG.W. ENCOUNTERED ATG.W. AFTER COMPLETIONG.W AFTER . HRSG.W. VOLUMES - -.r .-

tore, etc. ) Blowi /6"

OBSERVATIONS2~ FT.

— FT-FT. — •FT.

P.netr

INSINS.INSINS.

.ti.n

\ />. . . ~.v

l~.~Jt~ -- /•6. t'f**T * ••'•> -J

CO

\ I

10

12

13

14

15

16

17

tr.I » 20

21

22

24

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC. JOB NO


LOG OF SOIL BORINGBORING NO

PROJECT

CREW CHIEF HELPER .- xt-1


G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT __ FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT. i INS.G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.G.W

Simple D»pth

1

L*Q«n6 O«Otti Soil OMcription /' -

Ch»ng« { Density, Moifturi. Color. Tvxiur*. «tc. ) Blowi fS"

' ~' ~ '. —————— i

f)t

10

13

feil"]

a<y

15

IS

CT_C^re

20

(B '—• •to , 22

i 23

24

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D. -D'STU^BE D U. L-- UNDIST. LrNER S.T -SHELBr TUBE S.S.-SPL1T S^OON R C . - R O C K CORE

I

1

li!

' — /DATE ~ /

PRO 1CTT

LOCATION

CREW CHIEF _! S»mpl« D*ptL_ Et*v.

11f 1!

• 2

B• 3

' 4

V

E 5

6a; :.2

** B 700 B£ 8 BC. ^O) i

•0 . 9

= BE 1^1 11oO

"re ; 12

L • is

1 • ! IA7 B~ B 15

E *•— > 1 67c . —————————L. 1

1 :C.

C 18

- • ;C ! 19^

•- i 20

2 • :— • ;

K ,

tO ! 22

23

24

: "

raiLniuHR ir^iinu cnamccn^r inu. JOP NO^ . - GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS BORING ND :'-_;., _ -

-- - i nr; ni- win HOMINGFl EVAT10N „„.._ ni iiiimii-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS, ,__^ ft W FMeO;.)WTFRED AT ^- FT ~ ,N5

G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT , FT. |NS.— • - • - • . . ' . - • " - GW AFTF.R rnrmPLETiON '7 FT «^ )N5

/ . -. ^- , G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. (Ng-• '•" ' / HPI PFR -""^ **,+— GW VOLUME* • ', . ^,-

* ' -- -~h L«9«nd O*cth Soil Description ' _

Ch»no« ( Dtntity, Momuf*. Color. T«xtur«, »tc. I Blowi /6"

** /:> -"'•'• * / r '" " - —————

i 1

BB

| _ ;

j^ '-r1" I-*-.".-".'*. .:.rVw.i -X .- ' „- . .'.-' .v'/;'',"- r^.''^^. £.- •• , —— •

! B .•

C'-" C'^-- i~*'/ s s~?~'z-r~~t 1 !

1 '"

; i !i i

<

( . ^ r~ .

: ;; ' i

' j ; t

i : ; t: • 1

I: I• \: ———— 1

| : ' ——— i,

i ;

{ ;

i•

1

,

{ ''

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D -DISTURBED U.L.- UNDiST. LINEP S .T . -SHELBV TUBE S.S-SPLIT SPQON R .C-HOCK CORE OTHER-



LOG OF SOIL BORING•ORINO NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT — /

LOCATION//-) JJ

X— *-^^—

CREW CHIEF HF1 ppfi

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. |NS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. )NS.

G.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT. INS.G.W. AFTER MRS. _ FT. INS.G.W. VOLUMES

ftampl*L

h1-

1

I

'

1

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

8

6

7

a

.10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*9"")D*pttt Soil Description -

Change ( Density, Moitturw, Color. Tcxturt, etc. } Blowt /6"

ff'ffi"

WX .i*A/£ j c/ty &U, ^ro/^,

—————— 1: —————

r//Q.y rt4<csf&r}T4'-Z) **?&<* 7~ •/ T

^f f * / M I ^M' ^ *" &fii& £>f- / ±. t /^ ••|

h-——————————— 1

———————————— i———————— 13

l—I— i—

1—

00

•B£Q.0)•o

Io

.0ra

0)c0)aw.£*<20

01_cJ(D

r(0*-w

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. * SMELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-



BORING NO.

PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

V

9

l>>

5B^

>5 i

REVTC

-- 1= I'I —• Pll

*1IIill|lrfVs;32.

D

•*

i 1^

t3

0

1

1i

1

^^^N

HIEF .,-//'-7/:'V HFIPPR ^f X^X^TDepth

0

1

2

a

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

33

24

25

L""d^*

Depth Soil Descriptionof

Ch»rtO» ( Dentitv, Moiflore, Color. Tex

^-<?"S-c"

f. '0"

GROUND WATER OBSERVATlOfO.W. ENCOUNTERED AT £" FT. ^G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION £ FT. ^G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.G.W. VOLUMES jLJffjtft^jy

JS5 INS.

tNS.INS.INS.

Penetrationtun. etc. ) Blows /6"

^^y ^~Q , r,*y *.,.<. ~»,z.

S«fA -S*«6 ****," -"

~«t>. £•**£, &&>*,*; *.

r/AV &PVY ^rxr-

' 1 -"tfVuiO

f~ ' I

j j*^ * ^B

1 —— : —————— I—<;? /^ X-i / *f 1

———— 1

———

———

ii

i—

00

I

l

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UND1ST. UINER S.T.-SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON W.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC. JOB NO.


V . •— *

BORING NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

L

>

*EW D

Elev.

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONIM S W SNCDUNTFR6D AT £ ff &

^.-^_ / _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.•^ • .t~J;'- ~ ._ Q.W. AFTER COMPLETION £J pT J=

',.-,-, -- * „ „ G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.4IEF "" '• /* y HELPER — *" ^* S~ a.w UOLUUEB Jj. •.,...,

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

18

IS

20

21

22

23

24

25

, —— , Depthel

Change

£-•*•'

JS

" INS.INS.

" INS.INS.

Soil Description /* Penetration

( Demity. Moisture, Color. Taxturt. etc. ) Blowi /6"

/•7/Vf ^s'jrjQ +* t~. ' • jS S~-'-~ /" •'--"' ' 2~

I

•I1

——

- -- ~- ,~ • t)/

^"

£- J £.' f*O £ /^ far L£^ H

—————— 1

*I

—————— |

i—

00

»

•o

.01C

OO)aV

po>.*

CO

rn

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

I MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO.


BORING NO.

ELEVATION _1 PROJECT

LOCATK

• CREW C

r Ir1"'1i •fI ^fi 00

u

1 «4 oU .

••• •

I D.'ft)

*

1 11 -

03

!?7O

1 i*-

li_ k.

V

|1cn

I -S;ra<£ii

!

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION*1W G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT J» FT. -

S^^- / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.-xx' ' £~-&tSSf G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT.

/ , - j^ s ~ " °'W- AFTER / MRS- FT-rllEF ^-'tf&V HP1PER G-&rsF,*Z Gw VOLUMES J~-j's*.m/

O«Dth

O

1

2

3

4

S

e

7

8

0

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L^« Depthof

Chane*

f'C"'"*

JS

"" INS., INS.' INS.

INS.

Soil D«crlp<lor / P.™,,,,lon

( Dtftsrty, Morcturt, Color. Ttxtur*, «c. t Blows /6" '

/-/^ JT^^> .^4-^^ ^./^ ^X^£9"

e ss*y r#r~ss5 t-s?-rx.'0 *-* o'± * —

^ 1^ ' 1

———————— 1.•

———————— 1———

1 ___

DATE



JOi NO.

• ORINC NO.

ELEVATIONPROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW DSemole1 Elev.

1-

I-r

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOfIN CW ENCOUNTERED AT _^ FT *

>r- _,— y -. O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT __ FT.^,/ * £-&<S/3 __ r fi W AFTEH COMPLETION £T *T

J t / P t f i t s~ •* G.W. AFTER MRS. «T.<IFF ^/^oy ^«PIPER - fr^X^/*^- e.w.voLUM«^>-.^.iy

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

S

«

7

S

ft

10

11

12

13

14

IB

16

17

11

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

Legend Depthof

Chenge

:T'*"

^ '£

IS

INS.INS.

^ INS.INS.

Soil Deurlption ' _Penetretlon( OensrTv. Moisturt. Color. Texture, etc. 1 Blows /C"

/*?/)( jSvAii T^ tfT/'+'l/ /CT/ fci S^~fC ' *?7~~ \S ——————

——— 11—I "1pd

„, * " ———— iC//f Y }s/}/£s.£Z?#7>rt> s*tf?t r T"~ •

^ r 1^ x £/v& &f* /y*?/^£" H

1I|| ——

_ ——— J*V

-

———— i.

i—

1

I•+rf

8

one

outin

e pe

neak

Star

t

]

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D. -DISTURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LTNER S.t.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPL1T *POON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE


_ LOG OF SOIL BOFUNG

JOB NO.

IBORINO NO.

ELEVATION

"•

PROJECT

LOCAT1C

- c

'-00

o

•D

*•

•o

REW CSemple

1*F*CP I

in0)

o

Ic.0"*-aa>a>D.w

iO)

rre

,—>»/. ' " —————————————————— " ' ————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOP

•\ft ' B W, FwrO»lWTeREp AT _^.- *T, C

. —— y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.-S/« /-&UJJZ __ G.W AFTER COMPLETION ^ rT"^5

/ _ ^» -" G.W, AFTER HRS. FT.mEF ^ '/ttfV WPI PER « r- > «-V. x^ e.w. VOLUMES jJs- * ^. .

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

B

10

11

12

13

14

15

IB

17

18

19

30

21

22

23

24

25

L^nd Depthof

Cheno*

5-t>"

7'e"

- r ' -f

JS

INS.INS.INS.INS,

Soil Description / .

( Densitv, Moinure, Color. Texture, etc. ) Blowt/6"

S^S)f £st>^s£ f {'/£ y /^s£- /-*?*'/ £~ ™"

—————— 1•

—

—————— 1

1-

I k

1 I* *-

*tf

I !

TYPE OF SAMPLE: -D.-DISTURBED U.L,—UNDIST. LINER S.T. -SM£LBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION _PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

i1i

;

ii23

REWO

ElM.

I-

1-

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION»N i?w ewcauNTSRen AT ^* »T. C

_g™ /' ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.

-IICF ^•/ ^/3 V HFI PER £-6 Vg/2. G;w; VOLUMES V-T^t ,* \sDvpth

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

.

10

11

12

13

14

IB

16

17

1.

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

L^nd Oapthof

f'D"

US

7 INS.INS.

^ INS.INS.

Sol« PMCriptlon /Pcnitwiofl

( Oinsitv, Moiftur*, Color. Tvxturt. «e. 1 Blowi/B"

/"^^X i'^A/^J r ".' y /C/i£ X-/5 / s 7" "

————————— 1Nmi—^^^f

—— -^ ——— <8^ ^ (

^ * ^VW^ ^ A" /4^9 £<£* •

——••

I

1 "

—————

———— **

1 ——

——————————————— 1

————————— I

1

00

es

: je> CDf +•"

! rto*•>(O

.1

0

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINEB-S.T. - SH€1.B> TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-HOCK CORE OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION»ROJtCl

LOCATK

:REW cScmpla- Cl«v.

y

Hi-i-^1

— j r / / — ————————————————————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOr

IN G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^> FT C.

^—^s- y _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ __ FT.-1 ' f .-£-&lS/S -. GW- AFTER COMPLETION '^" PT. £

/ .. - ^^ O.W. AFTER ,HRS. FT.HIEF ^.'/V/^V HPIPER &-0M?A? -. G.W. VOLUMES A>~^ , ., x

D«pth

0

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L«9*nd D«pthof

Chang*

£'*"

8'6"

IS^ INS.

INS.^ INS.

INS.

Soil DMcripllon / _ .^ ' Pvnctrnlen( OtntKy, Moitturt, Color. Ttxturt, Me. } Blowc/6"

/*«#r -s^^o f' *v>*» y /=•/ <-£- /^c> / 5 -^-

———————— N1

———————— 1c/dy &/zci~>*s MQS&-T~

± IT^'<£W£ ^>/^ X^^^ 11

•

—————— 1-

—————— 1

I—

00

+•>

1 ^^^ji

c0)aa>

I!1 si rr

CO**to

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D. -DISTURBED U.U-ONDIST. LHNER S.T. —SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

• OWING NO.

ELEVATION _

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW Cr

El«v.

>-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN " _ Q W ENCOUNTERED AT £ FT &3 |N5

*«-•——- /- j., f Q.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.^--X/ ' ~—<P£/S~> " _ __ ___ GW AFTER COMPLETION ^7 FT £. )NR

KEF J/AS? I/ HPl PER &^ K^V^T „ «;*; VOLUMSS A^»^1 /y WDwth

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

.

B

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

IB

30

31

22

33

34

25

LWd Oapthel

f

S'&".

Self Ocwrlptlon _

( Density, Moinurt, Color. T*xtura. «e. 1 Blows IV

/~?/y £/$ss& ff c-/st-¥ ^f&z. *-*&*$ "2 - • i————— — — ^

i -i.

i—_—— L

1

-

————— I

CO

m«•*.8

esou

tine

pene

akSt

art

0

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LINE* S.T. — SHELflV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG QF SO)L

JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

IPROJECT

LOCATIC

;REW cSample

L Elev.

.

J——1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN .... a.w ENCOUNTERED AT ^3 FT *^ .ue

<r-»—« - / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.— »/ •> <£-&tS/£ ' -S.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT.

/ ^-r^»> ^^T f± . j j e»> ., -G.W, AFTER _ MRS. FT.H1EF J-/&fZy HP! PER :"-*'*r>ev<- B w: VOLUMES .A^Vl /. L/

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

5

8

7

6

• fi

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

L"™Depth

of

S'6>"

"

INS.INS.INS.

Soil Description ' BP*netretion

( Demitv, Moisture. Color. Texture, etc. ) Blowi/6"

1

_ j

——

—————

-

\-

————————————— 1• " •

--

-

I si v

-I

Ivo**S

V

0)aa>1 1vc

1 5:I

aW

DATE

MICHI6AN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

__ LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION _PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

ss1•o•B-£fr'SE£

1-s£os4^

I+•*

S*-s•>aI=s1*si•«to

REW O•mpl»El*w.

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION1W „„.„...„ OW etOCQLJNTERED AT ~7 tT £

^T-— ~ 7 ^ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT PT. —• -^ f f ^CtS' + •• _ ||MI_ Q_W. AFTER COMPLETION S '*

/,.** SC»*^s~'+ G.W.APTCR ,HRS. FT.41EF *• /• 'J/r V HELPER t^-^ " ?* -;..,11. a.w. VOLUMES U.-^ *, y

Ocpttt

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

•

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

1ft

IT

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*g*nd

ts5 INS.

INS.INS.INS.

0~* S°" °—— W«" P.n.w.,lDn

Ch»ne* ( Dtnsitv. Moitturt, Color. Tcxtun. Me. } Blows /6"

-^tf"

v-5"'i "

^'^"

^S'V S*n& 5' £S#y £'/££ *?J'/S7—

———— li—^V .'x^<r,-VL- 1 ^

•/*7'i' ^^--5 /~-i-L- S~? ? * r * " '

,•I

Wrft, $#4/*> /ZttfAS fr'&s /~&.F.£ $s£. I

tr 1^'^A^> ^ ^-^ 1

|

1 ——————————————— —

——————— N

' ——————— 1=1

i—

1

)

j

)

!

f1

I:i:ijf:i|

)i)ij

)>

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBEO U.L.-UND1ST. LINER S.T.— SHEILflV TUBE S.S.-SPL1T SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE


.*• *—

JOB NO.

SORING NO.

ELEVATION _PROJECT

LOCATK

CREW C

1f-r

N

r

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONIN G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT *? FT £

5 ~""~ / - • - / * • - G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.* ' *-^i//— __ GW_ AFTER COMPLETION *< FT ^

y . . • — _ ixvv °-w- *FT6R HRS- rr-HIEF ^-//VX* V/ HELPER £?~^ .^^ , ,.. o.w. VOLUMES /- >* LJ V

D«pth

0

1

a

3

4

B

6

7

0

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

LWd

•— ^••^ni

JS

" !NS.INS.

? INS.INS.

olChmrtgi ( Dcnstty, Moiftun, Color. T«xtur«, «te. ( Blowi /S"

/

/94"-

f I

—————————————

—————— l*1 ^^ r" 1

i m* n

/•"J/-™' jy?/V& &/!r&bS/>S fa//^ s s^LSS~f <-V*C •

-

WY r-&?v ™>z —/ j i

——

.

—1—

*1 =* ^"* ^-

•I0)

™-D

1 SI ^

re

i!1

CP

Ox»

0

I Mft

S

ll<D

1 ft)

°-

MO)S

l!I1

CO*•V)

TVPP OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UND1ST. LINER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPL1T "S^OON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHEH-

DATE



JOB NO.t '•

• ORINO NO. *-";

ELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATIO

Cl

00

0),>•O

«0

£.

1n£Fo0)§.0(0*•*00

»co*p*£**

I*-<a*•*u

1gssI.*«***rfis»-

CO

*EW ChSempJeEtev.

*^f />- , ' ••"" ——————— • ^GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

N mmmim a w ewrniiNTPRen AT *<" ET £T* IW.- -' / O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.

._'/* rf—— .^i^/ .-. - „...,.,,., ___ , , «*« A^TPB COfLtT'CM ^' FT C? INS

y s, xCoxVS^" G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.irEF JiWV HE! PER i-T^^ /C^ aw VOLUM« >^^^'V

Depth

O

1

2

9

4

8

€

7

•

»

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

IB

IS

20

21

22

23

24

75

Legend/

Depthof

Chenge

?'G"

Soil Description < MPenemtlon< Ovnsitv, Moisture. Color. Texture, etc. ) Blowi/f

A^x £<**'<& $ c/st-y F-tCL s-i c , - -7-

————— 1—

• *|I|J•I•

,,h—

^—— i ————— h

/tf'<F#A £> £ /7&^£. ••I

1———

I-

———————— feE.

!

i-

1)

)i1ii0"i

P>

.1j

ijii

>TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBEDU.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPL1T SPOON B.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

D

I I1 ,;1!1

miomu

ATE ?-/&*-€ *

ÔJECT

OCATIC

REW ClSempl*El*v.

1^ V§> . -1

l h1efl •, t F^l![ii

1 E 1i Mh> •

1 « ————

t*.

ii*p<

I ~

IIIBw**

1 C0)Q-0)

IIO>

i1* rm

1*1

HH icoiinu mmnL-cnt3r inu. JOB NO.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS MM 9£3*3 - ^BORING NO 7&r*rr /LOG OF SOIL BORING

.- ELEVATIHN£T / _____ _^_^_ —— _ —— _ ————— _ —— __^ ___________

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONIN __ B.Mf eWCOUNTERED AT *^ PJ.

^T*^- -/rv;y<- G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.>, ^ ^-w _-* S.W. AFTER COMPLETION */ PJ ^

/X» 'J X« -x^"-^» G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.

/rs^y HELPER ' <-""_^ r ^^ aw VOLUMES >V>--t .. vy

Death

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

8

9

1O

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

L-""1Depth

ofChenge

.

f'O"

// LO

JS

INS._ INS." INS.

INS.

Soil Description / „Penetrttion( Densitv. Moicturt, Color. Tcxturt, «c. ) Blowi /6"

wx ^~o f c/*y f.,i.t. *~t>sy~

•

I !• ,

—

———————— IE

——/V/TZ?* ^?/?fJl) /2-/?p0t*ssJ L+SiCZ- V^ •

A/'/-- Oi _SÂ^/i /^ r'. pc «*/ A> *V/f'^r" '£*£}*?£. c s £—

4r

——

=^j——————— i

i-TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L--UNO1ST. LINER S.T.-SMEL8Y TUBE S.S.=SPLIT SÔON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-



BORING NO.

ELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW Dtempi*. Ele*.

J

F

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOf>N - e w. SNCOMWTeBEO AT *T

£.«•—. y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^S * ,——OU/—— _ QW AFTER COMPLETION BJ

/ y, - x« , " ' G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.•11EF -A/«*«y HELPER &-£r/f *Z a.w.voL-uuH AJ**t£>

Depth

0

1

2

3

A

S

6

7

.

B

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Lw"d*

Depthof

Change

£'&"

«

INS.INS.INS.INS.

Soli Description _Penetration

< Density. Moiiturt, Color. Texture, etc. 1 Blowi/B"

/^XA- ^/x,/. ^ «y/«X ^'*^ <^*'S7-

———

1 —— •

1

' I

&Af/} G Jy& C~j£ , ••

V\Br***-*c T 'TiTj C ^iifnii n"aHi. t_t * r\*»»6ff» Co^kS^ •

V^^V ^Cv«*fs%^£Ct£ 1 "— —— 1———— i ——————————— —————

M——— 1•'

——— 11—

r

«*

IA

esou

tine

pene

akin

gSt

art

;]

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.--OI8TURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LINER S.T.-SNCLBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER

1I

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.DATE

PROJECT

LOCATION

f

C oo

1


JOB NO. _

BORING NO. ~7.*'•»'

ELEVATION

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST: LINER S.T.-SH6LBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT-SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NOELEVATION

-~ J?

PROJECT

LOCATIC

-C KEW Oftvmol*El«v.

L|-

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION1M _ O.W BNCOUNTPHSD AT f *T C

<•-—» y O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. ,— *X * ./.0tSJ T _„,._ Q-W AFTER COMPLETION ^ rT C

/ , >*" v*^*. °'W- *FTBB /MRS. FT.•IIEF .,._ , ^yA/TV/ '• HPIPER C2"~OtS&& awvnLUMEs /-^-',?'/\y

Dwth

0

1

2

a

4

S

6

7

.

0

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

l_*e*ndof

-

,'

fV"

JS

" INS.} INS.

INS.INS.

So l DMcrlptfon '

( Dcraity, Mo«tur«, Color, Tcxturt. «te. ) Blewi/6"/^X^" _^^VX^) G S~'^y jZ'tLt. S~rC</£7~ I

' ———— —————

| —————————————————— 1

.

———————— 1————— JE:

" ^T ' ' ~" ' Ii

f

————

'

3

——— ———— 1- •

I—

CO

.£

w

|

I

s

•s

"TYPE OF SAMPLE: D,-DISTURBED U.L. UNDIST7-UJNER S.T.—SHELBV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

• OR.NO NO.

ELEVATION

~ £>/

[ PROJECT

LOCATIC_*

[ CREW C

fUrnpl*£l«v.

i <1 In'I8

1

S *1 *

J=

I £

. C

. E

It

1|i %\ °ls

M* flB)

t S1 a* 0)

C

I 3h1si «* »

a5ii

p*

V-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOf1M .. ._ GW ENCOUNTERED AT / 4^ PT ^

^_,__ y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT *FT-^ T V > £-&*S/JT G.W AFTER COMPLETION S O p-f (

•4IEF- /-/ ^^X HELPER ^e ^^^T G w VOLUMES J^jy. x/Dwth

0

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

8

e

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L*".ndD«pth Soil Description ' _

Ch»no» ( Dtmitv. Moiituri, Color. Ttxlurt, «tc. I Blows /6"

ID'D"

IS•^ tNS.-* INS." INS.

INS.

•tmion

_____ f „ ^ _______ ,

————————————————— 1

————————————————— 1

———— : ——————— IMFft* S*Q*j£ s£/**/>u/sS ts/&5~' /^isS? ' L O t L~

=—

\-^ r

-

—————————— 1

, _

_ifVPE_pF SAMPLE:. D — niBTUpBFn II i — ,1 iwrMCT i iweo «T . cue . «.v TUBC *»• ^B. .- "---•• - -

PROJECT


_ LOG OF SOIL BORING<r j-

GCt* *BORING NO Tt>* //

ELEVATION

LOCATION

CREW CHIEF Death

Ei«v.

HELPERD»oth

elSoil Description

( Demttv. Moiitur*. Color. Texturt. etc. ) Blowi/6"

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSC.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT. ^? INS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS

C.W. AFTER .MRS. FT. INS.

G.W. VOLUMES^rT^tJ^ V

"I

o£>(6

O

Q.

0 \

O).£!irer lratn

I

ID

11

12

13

14

IB

16

17

IS

20

21

22

23

25

S'cr

i

t

3 ]

ITYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DlSTUR«ED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. - SMtLBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.-KOCK CORE OTHER-

I

MICHIGAN TESTING EKGIKEEBS, IHC. JOB NO.

!l

I

PROJECT

LOCATION

II

i

\\

CREW CHIEF

4•*8

*

8

e*-B)CQ>a

s

sen

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

19

20

ai

22


SORING NO.

^S-t -^^ff——-—-—

ELEVATION

HELPERD*eth

ofSoil 0«crlptton

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT (*»G.W. ENCOUNTERED ATG.W. AFTER COMPLETION C*G.W. AFTER HRS.G.W. VOLUMES

FT.FT.FT.FT.

INS.INS.INS.INS.

P.n.tr«len

( E>*nsiTv. Moiiuir*. Color. Tvxtun. «te. t Blows /6"

5

_i_

DATE


JOB NO.

NO.

ELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW aS«mpl*

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSbM Q W ENCOUNTERED AT <y ft ^ ,NS

--,«- y O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.S /* i ' -£t24-//-_r . ft W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT O ,N«j

Z*j2sA\s /ÂtS*^* O.W. AFTER HRS. FT. INS,4IEF ^/>S^»y HELPFR CrOr&SZ: aw. WALUUM 4/* -..*,.*

0

1

2

3

4

B

B

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

IB

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L~"" of

©•a"& » 0 "

J3.-0*

Soil DM-ription X - __ „._r r_n_tr_tlon

t Dtntltv. Moitturi, Color. Ttxturt. *tt } Blows /B™

^^ sx £**fct& f f/s? y /£/££. xâ/ST*™" I

|

•

J — '• ___ .•1|1•1I

c-.**~a*e | ——•

tf#& . -S-5W_O X? /STÂ^/^ A/^ /^r*/^r7^ _5 / tf- •1

——

_5xfn<PX c^^y ^stfevft/ *#&/$• 7~ j/ - / • - • - ' . - . , _ . , . , , „ ^

•r • __

H

———————— feE

—————

l-i

CO

•3

_-

I1

aJ;

0**

I

ta+*en

TVPf OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L-UNOIST. LINER S.T. -SHELBY TUBE S.S.-S^LIT SPOON K.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATEi1ii



JOB f4O. _

BORINQ NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

L

n

REW ClftemeleElev.

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION1M _ fi.W ENCOUNTERED AT ? *T, ^

S • G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^*7~r •£*&f/S*r G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT

J ^ * '^. G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.•IIEF *•'*%&¥ HELPPB &-6*/S?<<: GW VOLUMES X4r^/> u/

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

6

6-

7

8

0

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1B

19

20 •

21

22

23

24

25

L^< 'Depthof

Chene*

/ &

f3'C'

JS

INS.INS.INS.INS.

Soil Deacrlption Penetr tlan

1 Density. Moisture, Color. Texture, etc. ) Blows /&"

+*sy **<"* f'&<*y <*="U. ^O.ST- ——1••I• i—

! =1

&WM C/*V &**^~ S-«0f*^

± I^ S*f ' -PX/4 & A'c ££ •1

————————— 1

t-

1 liCO

«

•O

•8

a0)•o

! .§

S is:(D**cn



JOB NO.

BORING NO,

ELEVATIONPROJECT

LOCATIC

C

b5±

i:*IEi*

|:8

- 0)§*rf£;£MafcQ)

0>a««->oi•s~r$V)

REW a•mpl*ClM.

I-

I

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIM nw *MCr>UNTERED AT ^7 «T O m,

•<*7 "• V ,- >• O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS,'.' JrQC/Sf aw AFTER COMPLETION -X »T ^ ,N5'

/ > ^ y S* s*t*.->* °-W' AFTBB MRS. FT. INS.«EF A-XO^V HeiPER f~GG/'ffs& ___ a.w. VOLUMES /rferf V y

Dwth

0

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

B

B

10

11

12

13

14

16

IB

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

28

L^«df « ———————————— ——— = ———— - ——— — f. - —————————— .— n

Ch*np« ( Dcntitv. MoUtuni, Color. T«xtur«, etc. ) Btowi/B"

7'0"

/6<C»

M'X **** frs#y mi ^o/^r- i ——I•IIi-'

?.

\ ——

———— fe£//V y &-/£& X /^-^ o / J ™"

/ - '

———————————————————————————— ___ f

:M

I

I-I

MgT~)\

}

piI]t

I

TYPE OF SAMPLE: ©.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T."--SHEI.BY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R..C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

I .! ;!.;iiii r . — .

miuniu

ATF ^ '*&' * &

HOJECT

OCATIC

REW Cl

11 si

i!i»riii if-»

1\ -s1 l — '

f Si :£*-

1 -iI ~2o>

f c1 «{ aw

1 !1 D>

i :to

V)

1(

t

ff~

->, £?

an iconnu cubinccno,GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

/

w

-tlEF XX^-^X WPIPPR - C^Ot^^^

0

1

2

a

4

B

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1S

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

'"-"'

•• "•

rOaoth Soli DMcriptfon

ofCh«r«a« { D»nsity, Moiitur*. Color. T«x

f>0»

inf.. JOB NO

BORING NO i&f"/^ ~ «*

ELEVATION

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT. ^* INS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. |NS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION £• FT. ° INS.

G.W. AFTER . MRS. FT. INS.

tur*. «tc. ) Blows /6"+*,* ^s^& # es«,y ^.** ^cisy- ———

— =P———

^^. x»^> *****> <*;* "

h-' ^^C- >^? ^-^

"~

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T. —SNEL8Y TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON H.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

HATP


JOB NO.

BORING NQ.

ELEVATIONPROJECT

LOCATIC

c

.

00

o.>™•o<eX4-<QV•o

REW Oft*mpl«

Elw.

.:

1•pJCO

it»-

«o*-£*-co"*-c*-«OJQ.

?*-

sfJCst(Q«H

(0

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOh»N _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT ^

<--r-- / G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT _FT.5s* +~0£//£ _ Q.w. AFTER COMPLETION/L^Vt^TT

y *j*S> \S S~ *~ -^ O.W. AFTER HRS. FT.4IEF S-/&ey HPIPER GrOl/£/£ Q.w. VOLUMK //^-^ T~

D«)th

O

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

•

B

10

11

12

13

14

IB

16

17

IB

IB

20

21

22

33

24

25

l>9«nd

IS? INS.

INS.INS.INS.

°»* »°" O-"*"'*" P.ftMr.,ten

Ch«n«* ( Dtmtty. Moinur*. Color. Tcxtur*, Me. ) Blows /6"

*/%«

fo"

tt/f ^?**& f £SSJy s=zs*^- s^so'57— 1 ___

————————— — —— -E———— 1^1—.^

—/ J—I I —* j mse<**s& e/^ &&4SS. |

~r~

—— (*

————— 1

————— 1

i—

--

' 1

f

-.]]:]r]:ij

i•

1

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LIN6R S.T. - SHELIIY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON W.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

I


DATE ^-^- f fPGEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

SORING NO.

ELEVATION .'ROJECT

LOCATK

:REW c$*mpl«

_ El«v.

1-H ———————

nI

•

"-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONIN .__ r. w, Pwcni,iNTCRPD AT *T,

^C^ / ^ O-W- ENCOUNTERED AT FT._>/ - ^> OtfX /_j QW AFTER COMPLETION FT

/ .4 j- X" - -**• G.W. AFT6R MRS. FT.-UEF ^VO^Ty HF1PPR Cy*Gl/tr^ Bw v/n.uMts^V/S^^/T-

Ovptf*

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

ft

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IS

19

20

21

22

23

Li0wtdfOveth

01Chvno*

•r^X/

7'tf"

asINS.INS.

INS.INS.

Soil DMcription .P*nttritien( Dtntity. Motrturt, Color. Tcxtura, «te. ) Blowi /6"

WX £>!*/£> &<rs*Sf &*<-<- A-^e/c-T" 1 ___

J•

I|

—

—————————— 1f/#v o*e&. **?D'Z7~ •

i

•

•

r//^y &€&**-> A-*=?>_r-r— 1/

1x^'-tf^^ */*" xV^^^r |

—————— i•—————— i

=——

_

eoo>™•o«S

*-&•D3 *

I I

I .".*-e>

1 2• 4 4-

s

V

Va

i «o>J£ra'i s

I ra«^(A


D

P

L

" C

«

:a'|

i'**1V

o

ilc•s

ATE T * -3f' "" O *

10JECT

OCATIC

REW Oimpl«

l-£ lA] 1

£ 1ac

o

!*-r2CO

1-

1

^1 x£V

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS .Dq,NO No f^/?- 7LOG Oh SOIL BORING

ffLEVATION _„.„__...

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOhM aw EMCOUMTEIlen AT ^T FT 6

_, y O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT..S^X^T *£~QtSS^ m M GW- AFTEH COMPLETION £T FT &

y ^^ x,* j ****** O.W. AFTER HflS. FT.HIEF X/>?X^y . HELPFR C>-<5*<<-*C aw vniuMEfiX/^^ix

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

a

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

16

19

• 20

21

22

23

24

25

L^nd Owihof

5-'^"

^•tf"

.-^ .- ' - rr - - r

JS

* INS.INS.

» INS.• INS.

5oll E)0tCriOliOft ' "•mtf yfj o n( D*nsttv, Motfturc, Color. Tcxturt, «te. ) Blows /•"

/-V* ^V^/v^ f --/^^ xS, -^ox.**- | ———

1

—

—————— 1,

^«^__

____ ^

, " —————— fe(. //) \/ fS'flf.f'-faSf^ /*.-,? 0*1*' •

/ I

1 —————————, —————————————————————————— S£ ——————————————————————————— „ .__ , . . •

S

——————————————————————————————— 1

—————————

1 ————

^ 1I

\

11J

r.}:i:i:i:i'ij)i;

D„ f-?r,.Sfff PROJECT

* LOCAT1Ci

>i •.„I:liiI'-r

REW Cltampl*

I -' 1« r0>

1*11

11

- 1i &r1 H .I 0i < r

! S1 so

1 1**£*-*1 i« •*ra**

f *1 »1 °-

o>

1 iO>

I «1 "• rn*->cnii

1

^™" ^

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS . &£~/~ - ~?• ORINQ NO.™^-''- ' 'LOG OF SOIL BORING

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN __ „_ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT G» FT. ^ IMIC;

— --•-*- -^, -f^- G-w- ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.^ X" ' ^-&t>'£& _ G w AFTEn COMPLETION «» FT ^O 1MR

/ trfj^ S~* rS^J* G'W- AFTER , / HRS" FT' INS-4IEF S*f&#y HPIPFR &rOCS<F<~ Gw VOLUMES X^Vf/t^Depth

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

25

' D«pthof

Changa

£•*"

#0"

SO" D^crlptton P»n.U.tiOn

( Darwitv, Motstura, Color. Taxtur*, •te. } Btowi /6"A7/X 5~st*s& f? er/sf)' ^/^- y*-^c/s7^

—————————— 1=

1

———— ^ ——— ^ ^. | ____

1

—————————— 1

——————————— 1=——

. . ——

D

P

L

C

r

*

*

IE

1

1

ne p

enet

ratio

n te

st o

ne

o

!««•*W

MICHIGATF 7~rC* S'P

ROJECT

OCATIC

REW CtS«mpl*Elm.

I-

k

1

J «•

AN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. J0. «0GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS #£>2X7- ^

BORINO NO 7&0*rs *LOG Oh SOIL BORING

j~ ELEVATION _ _

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION1*1 m Q.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.

-i / _ o.w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^S.r *-^t>/—— O.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT,

4IEF A /^*> / HFI PER 6-° *^^X , , _ a!w! VOLUMES //^XIX/T

0

1

2

3

4

B

B

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

IB

19

20

31

22

23

34

29

L* d

SINSINS,INS.INS.

Dooth Soil Description _ ,of Ptnttfitlon

ChBno* ( Density, Moinur*. Color. T«1urt. Me. ) Blows /S"

S'0"

/,v"

"'——'-'———- ———— J=

I

1£s*C?<^r GrSS? y •————

J ___^ —— g~ t

———— : — : ——— =,

1 "—•

———— 1

1—

' J

i

f'

'

1J

1- J

;w\Jj

(

TYPE OF SAMPLE: D.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT S^OON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

IDATE_ZT-



JO* NO,

f -II *cB

! -1 1

IOo

6 Vi ;w0)av

oO)

ra*-C/)

I

BORING NO

ELEVATION

'ROJECT

LOCATIC

;REW c— ClBV,

•

K

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIO*IN , „ B.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT C

^^•m^f J G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT rj.^/ . ^£><^/^ ' G.W. AFTER COMPLETlONXX3X/^fe,

/A /2 t £.*,/;* <* G.W. AFTER .MRS. FT.

/ O O / HEI PER *"** *^«^- G w. VOLUMES Xx^X^-T ——Dmth

0

1

2

*

4

B

6

7

e

B

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

IS

19

20

21

22

23

24

LVMOf

£•*"

/0'0«

s* INS.

INS.INS.INS.

, Soil D*ftcriptlon _ ,

( Dvnshv, Moifturi, Color. Tcxturt, rte. ) Blowt/6"^/X, &"& f r'*y r,^ ^*'lr- ———

1•11

—••1

^

,,

._.

——

1

1 D

MICH1G

I| PROJECT

1 LOCAT1C

! - - .i( CREW Cf

t S*m»l*i L KM*.

f-hu1feli| —

Si"*]lTD

(0

1O

91

Oa

OO

toO*•>

$*«

C£Vjo•»*uc0)a.0)

O

I1*w

£

.

-

I1

1

5\

AN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENG.NEERS .OR.NG NO ^BA/)-',LOG OF SOIL BORING

,-„ SL^W^TIOM

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONM . , _ GW. ENCOUNTERED AT "7 FT.

-*-— „. >/ O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^7~. &&tS/*S mm m _ Q.w. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT. ^

/ j^ *^J * " j^? 4*^ t ^9 j& C.W,~AFTEB WRS, FT-41EF A/'CStty HFIPPR "" &"»*^^^- -IM ___ GW VOLUMES /j^^^ \f

OiDth

0

1

*

9

4

S

6

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

IB

1»

20

21

22

23

34

25

L*,.«d

S* INS.

INS.3 INS.

INS.

DM* Soil OMCrlptlor. / p.n«r«tonol

Ching* ( Dvnsity. Motstun. Color. T*xturt, etc. ) Blowi/6"

70"

/t '*"

HI*. f1~£> f <T'*r r"->- ^C'LT-

———————————————— 1

1 —————— 1|

'

1 ————————————

.

C/rty £s£0t*s*»S S~~ro f s ^

=4 ————————— i

——————

—— _ ,

————— -

_ ^ y_ j*"" H

' BE

>

-...»._

1 —— i- • • • - I — \^•— '

— _

In

?t

•

ii'!'

——.— -,- *Ah.ni f. n —DIST_UHBED U.L.-UNDIST. LINER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON Pi.C.-WOCK CORE OTHER-

DATE

PROJECT

LOCATION

CREW CHIEF

k•o•9

oQ)O

f £» i•V*

ID

w111 i


BORING NO.

ELEVATION

HELPER

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT. INS.G.W. AFTER HRS. FT. INS.G.W. VOLUMES

Sftmpti. Ei»v-

B

_^

^

I1—

D*ptt>

O

1

a

3

4

6

e

7

B

fi

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

2S

L*p»nd

- —

DM* Soli 0«criPtton F MTionof

ChBHp* { Otnsity, Motfturt. Color. Tcxturi, «tc. ) Btowi /C"

3'k"

W"

-?'G"

t~9/X* g~*'V£> f friy ^*t.t- /-y*/ir-

——————————— 1-C&*sC&& 7& 4 £*&&& &LL

x~ SG* GfJ& Of=- */ott£

—————————— 1

•

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DISTURBED U.L.-UNOIST. LINER S.T. - SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SfLIT SfOON R.C.-ROClt CORi OTHER-

DATE



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW o| S*mp4e« Kiev.

,1———

i=11•

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSIN ' .__ O W ENCOUNTERED AT *T, |nj

^*>_^ J G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.i> ../ . £~&(>S/-$ __ _ G.W AFTER COMPLETION *T ,M^

/ *A& *S /CoL/^S G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.•4IEF A 'OOy HELPER w-f *"/*•*- G.W VOLUMES A Irtx \tZ

Depth

O

1

2

3

4

B

6

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

23

23

24

25

L""ld

-

Depthof

3-t"

. Boll Description f

i Density, Moiftuct. Color. Texiurt. etc. ) Blowf /C"/^M * g~*W£> f C~"*ty S=*f4-t- S-fC'l^

]

I I

a** ***«», »*,~r~ • ' h J•^ ' /= y/ • i^ ^ 1 1

}

I f

1

1-L

—————————— 1^1————— ' 1

——————————————— —3———————————————— 1B i

ii

———————————————— = j'

' . • ' . . - • . " " . : . , —• |n

——— :

" ' • " ' " ' \

..: . ' : • —• - • • . h- .1-

0)

*CTD

•B

Q.01

Vc0)o.0)_c**

oO)

to

re*-en

,«P «;-SPLIT S^OON B.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

[ DATE

PROJE(

f-

;T .,£D-

m

e^MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.


JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

C& ft '^

PROJECT

LOCATIC

C

V

*C

;REW c(ampleEtev.

I

•o 1

J1:flj '

Star

t ta

king

rou

tine

pene

tratio

n te

st o

ne f

oof

Sov

1-

-

II

I1 ——

I

_ X t .. , ——————————————— ' ——————— —GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOP

iw • , , , . , . G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT *? FT ^^r^^. J f G-W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT,^ > . &r&(>S/^ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT C

/A rt . J^ *.. .* G.W. AFTER MRS. FT,

I&&Y HF1PER Cror&£. GW VOLUMES J^TVJ^A/

Depth

0

1

2

3

4

B

t

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

LOT, Depth01

Ch»ne*

?>o"

IS'O"

JS

' INS.INS.

5 INS.INS.

* Soil Description ' ~

1 Density. Mowtuti, Color. T*Kturt. etc. ) Blowi tfA*7/X / Jf^^X^ /* fsjy /^*/<.t- f~yv/z.7~

-

—————— EE-

—————— 1

c/4y £&t^ ^s»ssr-Jr ; I^ X^" "x/ ^/*^ /V^1 £ El

. . - • - . " ' - -

- _ '

- . . .

t—

II I

woe nc CAMPI p. n —niCTKBBED U.L.-UNDIST. LIHER S.T.-SHELBY TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.—ROCK CORE OTHER-

Start taking routine penetration test one foot above nominal depth & drive 18".

o5<orCEmVI

^

1\

O5»TlHm»

*I)VI

•»^

ZIft

os>F

TE

R C

OM

PL

m-1OZ

M11H

0z*"

oSmZnOcznXmO>-1

•n-1

ZV>

OSmZooczHmXrnO>H

M•»H

0ZVI

GR

OU

ND

W

>Hm9

Osma<>6zV)

niO>

c~:EEers>

•" a -o m

S ° rr0 5e/O -< —•n w =

•~ o a

8 ? ^r- m rr

si?3) m aZ SSo i/i rr

nvrc-.

> S ;


JOB NO.

BORING NO

!lELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW C| Simple

I''"'

iLIr-h•|^

-

l-

1i

— - ' 4— ——————————————————— ———————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOf

Ifd ,.. IB G.W ENCOUNTERED AT ^^ FT C

^^^ y G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^> / . ^"O^^-S G.W AFTER COMPLETION./ FT O

H1EF / / & / WE1 PER ^° */#£- _ G.W VOLUMES J«fe*3 eS\J

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Lw"dof

to'*"

12,' o"

-

-

JS

• INS,INS.INS.INS.

Soil DMerlptlDft ' P.n.tr.fioft

( Dimity, Moiftur*, Color. Tvxiurt, *tc. ) Blows /6"

A-J/X / £~sjsw& ^" frty j?ftri~ s~f * '£ y*

————————— 1

,

&#y &&&y *-*?& ts ? —^

R1

1

_____ 1

• " • ' • ' - HH

• - . . . p

-"

*•*

I -1 :

li

O)

1 0CCD:

DATE



JOB NO.

NO.

ELEVATION _PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW CfI SamoltU Elw.

b0)1t0.0)•o

e no

mina

SJD«*^OO

V

o*-£*^c_om*-V

&w£*-*•3O

o>£-k!(0w

r2w

1-

-

1I

1

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOft)M IIM ,„ G W FMPOUMTEMEn AT *f *T £

x-*. y - G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^> y . ^Dt^S.S' _ GW AFTER COMPLETION *? KT C

//> /) it j£l~.,Ss*^ O.W. AFTBB MRS. FT.

t&&Y HFLPER fre«^4S. a.*.w«_UMK/A^;wDepth

0

1

2

3

4

6

C

7

•

»

10

11

13

13

14

IB

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

33

24

25

L«0W>0

-

- -

/Oaoth

ofCh«n0«

3'fi"

/#'*"•

ISINS.

INS.' INS.

INS.

Koll DMeriptlon _ . _P«n«umon

( D»n«ity, Moiftur*, Color. Tvxturi, Me. ) Blows /6"A?M, £***+•*& f c-ss-iy Ftt-L. *-,c*s.-y-

t

——————— 1— w

——————— 1±——————— 1

————

1——

W

——— .

rJ*y &&>**">. s^r&'S *— m

+ m/£'&**> &/* &OLQ. ———

————

—— i———

•

u=d

n

)

!111]1

\11)

i

DATE_Zn



JOB NO.

NO

ELEVATION

>ROJECT

LOCATIC

:REW c&*mpu

_ Elm.

•

r•1

h-ij

-

_ f i^ f — — . — . —— , , . -.... ———GROUND WATER OB5ERVATIOI*

M\| , „ a W ElyCOUNTEBED AT ^ fT C

^^_^ > O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. ,^» / „ £&tS*^ _ O.W. AFTEft COMPLETION ^ FT C

/ JS A */ 4£.*,S*9S G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.41EF ^/OteY HFI PFR CyDVfiK- G w VOLUMES 4/*>.rt.S^/

D*ot»i

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

L«9«nd/Dvptti

ofChangt

<?'&"

/Z'0"

IW

*SiINS

j INS.INS.INS.

. So*J D*Mri01ton * _P*n«tr«tion

I Dftftttty, Mo'nturi, Color. Tvxturt. «tc. ) Blows /6"A-7/*/ X^v^ /- frty J=*tt-t- A^r/ir-

——————————— f^

——————————— 1——————————— 1^A4f'£ -J^v^ Bseew* *V//^T— •

•1

MG&. -£**>/) X^/fiaPWAS ^X"7"~ /^&£ ctt-

—— ( —————V/7'>£>>/> c*^ yM=>^£*

I•Q——— . ———————————————————————— | ——

-

•

CD

*>

c.*

>

I JD1 :

1 5re"

va

PATE V-



JOB NO. ___

BORING NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW C

'T

'.

11

-

\-

I1

•

_~ * *__ > ' — — ——— —— ——————————— — ——— - ———— -

GROUND WATER OBSERVATlOUIN . . ._ G.W BNCOUNTERED AT «f FT. 4

<-~^- y _ G-w. ENCOUNTERED AT ' FT.£• / ' &^(S/^ __ BVl( ArTEB CDMPLfTION ^ 'T. O

y A&,\i /£ntS&S O.W. AFTER MRS. FT.•ItEF A/^5Oy HEtPER' GrOrf9£~ GW VOLUMES jJ^^ff\/

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

B

ft

10

11

12

13

14

16

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

L~"° D*pihof

<?'0"

/Z'<?"

-

Soil Dvmcriptlon / _r%W

( Oftnfitv. Moinur i. Color. Tcxtun, «te. } Blows IV

Hi*. &"& f r»*r r<" w*r»

JS

? INS.INS,

INS.

•tt.,ior.

!

^

i

1 !1

. __|

" " I1

<T//9y <£&*>„ MO,IT-

'J-

- •

UJ]

^_)-I

:

H.•

•:.: " • — '' - . — •. - • —

CO

c0>Q.

V

**

O

i

i,r

:i1

u01

i!* «ZJ

1*

Star

t ta

king

rou

tine

pene

tratio

n te

st o

ne f

oot

abov

e^ ^

mi

MICHIG^&TC V** .VC* "* W S*

ROJECT

.OCAT1C

;REW c

•

5*mpl«Elm.

1111-\-

-

Ifr—

I

*

AN TESTING EGEOPHYSICAL ELOG OF SOIL

,£•>

W _, „. , „.. ,. , , _

It'A&V HP.PER &°S

0

1

2

3

4

s

6

7

B

S

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

LW"'

NGINEERS,^GINEERSBORING

^/2^

INL. JOB NO.

Gd£ *3 -mfBORING NO yC™/? ~I-

ELEVATION

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSO.W. ENCOUNTERED AT C+ FT. INS.O.W, ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION (# FT. ^ INS.G.W. AFTER .MRS. FT. INS.G.W. VOLUMES j-fgA (jy

Dwth Soil D~crlptlon / F.n.w«ionO'

C*«np* ( Dtnsitv. Moifturt, Color. Tixturi, Me. ) Blowi /6"

-

6.'0"

/o-&"

/^/A* „£*>*'*'£> f £"*'•* y s^/t-L, /-/r/iT—

——————— 1-

/-?/£^ -5 -'-*0 ^XSfc? '/V U&7~' £?**'+-£• Of 4*

^-^ V /O? y/ ^^

></'.

x-^,o^s:r————— ^ •

•*•• ' ^ ^———

. . - . • - •

•

-

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. JO» NO.


NO.

ELEVATIONPROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW O1 $*mpi«

IFV-^M

'

L

»

'..

-

•

— ' t- y - ———— —— ——— • ————— — ""• "' ' ——————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATION

1M _.„, . Bw ENCOUNTERED AT ^7 fT <£

^*-^. y c O-w. ENCOUNTERED AT , rT.>/ . ^-^*^/_S __ BW AFTER COMPLETION ^7 *T £.

X >) X? */ /C«L/^2 OlW> AFTiP* HRS- PT- */C5*j5y HFIPER OrO^^ .. Q w VOLUME* tA'^f^^

D*eth

0

1

2

3

4

5

<

7

•

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

»

20

21

22

23

2'

1

L"*nd

-

OM>fhof

y./"

7'&"

JJ'o"

iTS

• INS.INS.

> INS.INS.

tSoli Dvccrtption ' .

1 D»mhy. Moirturt, Color. T«xtur«, «te, ) Blows /6"

«/A. JTT^V^ < WX ^ ^e,^r-

" 1

_ 5=T•

X 1

i

|

|

•| -*

Ri———— nr——— fr

r.1

•————————— r~

.

i—— ^-i•H

-

——

CO

•w•o•B

aw•oTo

o

JDID

§

V

Va0)

n**LO

I DATE



JOB NO. ___

BORING NO.

ELEVATION .

'i l

\

II

CO

CB

*c•D

•8

a•8"5

oc0)

I t/I

:_o*Jra*_•O)c<ua

to+•>

rto£

'ROJECT

LOCATK

;REW cSample

« Elw.

h-rIi

,1i-

9•

i

__ / 4^ . — « . ———————— ~ — - , ... - — . ———————

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOAIN . _ , a.w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT

- __ -x -.— y - G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.> > . ^-^t-V«S __ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT

/ ,j\ .^O / . ^ X j» j^ G*W, AFTER MftS. FT.HtEF , X/C5C?y " ." -HELPER - Gr&r&Z,. ew VOLUMES */A*S*?

D«pth

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

e

s

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L""<<

.. 1 •• II "•

/

D*pihof

IS

INSINS.INS.INS.

I Dtnfftv, Moinurt, Color. Ttxturt, itc. ) Blom /F*

«/A. X - < X /r i. »^T-

————————————— tE

•E•

'• ^^m^^mm.

tI~

ST.-SMELBV TUBE s.s.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.—ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE '/-



JOB NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

PROJECT

LOCATK

CREW CS«mpl«- Etw.

b!-

-

I1

1

— ' i— * " ————————— ' —— ' ————————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATlOP

IN ' GW ENCOUNTERED AT ^ ft ^

^**^. J f C.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^y • &&t**S*& , __ _ fiW AFTER COMF1 FTirtN ,y KT ^

/ A A 1 j£ ~Js**> GJW. AFTER HRS. * FT.HIEF 4/&&Y HFIPFR &0I//3& o.w. VOLUMM JL^--——

Cwpth

0

1

2

3

4

«6

e

7

•

•

10

11

12

13

14

IS

1ft

17

IB

19

30

21

22

23

24

25

L«9«nd

•MMHBMMH

/

Depthof

Ch*ne*

f'6"

£,«>"

-

tfS

' INS.INS.

^ INS.INS.

. Soli DMcrlotion / .r«n«trnien

( D»n»rty, Moisturt, Color. T«xturt, «tc. } Blows /6"

/-7M* X>^^ f *-"*>" ^ i- S-f6'S~r-

t

—————— 1^^^1I*"*

^/^y (*i&fiv ATO/ST" •1—^ 1—v/^'-e^/> *^ /^«^^ |

— M

1——— I

——— •

--

_

———i

00

•-*Q.

Q>aa>.£™3O

DlC

) 4-1

n4->(A

1

TVPF nt <AMPI F- n _r»i«TimBeO U L.-UNOIST. I..INER ST . -SME"_aV TUBE S.S.-SPLIT SPOON R.C.—ROCK CORE OTHER-

IDATE


_ LOG OF SOIL BORING<T /r

JO» NO. _

BORING NO.

' ELEVATION _PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW-CI

llw.

r1

Il1-/

-

i'

i

— - y 4__ f ——————————————————————— • —— ——————————

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOtIN „ ,.,_ Q.w ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT <

^^^ _ > G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.>/ . &*&tSS*£ _ __ G.W AFTER COMPLETION 3 FY C

/* /} , S* j - * G.W. AFTER MRS. FT

t f* M^ 1 / ^^m 0^ if -^ j& * •/OOX HELPER erc?^/?^ _ G.w VOLUMES j ^^ ^ y

0

1

. 2

3

4

6

6

7

a

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

C r*

JS

3 INS.INS.

5 INS.INS.

Otottt . Soil DttcripTion " < f K _.Of

Ch»r»e» ( Dvtnttv. Moinurt, Color. Ttxtun. «tc. ) Blows /6"

2-0*

•

6v»

MX. &»£> f r',^ ^,^ s-r"i.

&*<Z C/xJv ^^1-— ————— 1'' * " '" \—

•B•

-

i—

I.00^

8»

I V;to(B•Jo>C0)Q.w

I so

I i^2

o>cJ*

CO

n•*W

DATE/• «-yv - 3* -


JOB NO.

• OflINO MO

ELEVATIONPROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW CtI SimpleL Elw.

|

1!

\~\

\1 -

* I

*•^ 1D.P —————O 1•°l .1g.0TO

OoO)c0

t:£1(0

V0.

CJ

o

_cre

n

1-

-

1\

1

1M

4IEF ^ 'ItA&V HPIPFR tfe«^«

0

1

a

3

4

5

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L""-

"-

• - «™««

O*pth iof

Ch»ng« ( D*mity, Moil

£•0"

'/•&»

(,'0~

A7/A » £~*+v£} f

f^-~

toll DMtriptlen

luff. Color. T«x

*"**•?¥ /*"/\

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT. W? INS.Q.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. ^- INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION X/ 'T. & INS.O.W. AFTER <HRS. FT. INS.G.W. -VOLUMES V^JT^/yl/

' ' f/ f^'lf r

turt. Me. ) Blows /6"

«.*. X^./I.T-

————— EE/*#&, &~» &<e*~«s ,^,0'^T—

/-?££, £**& f?/?C**"*>

C/S?y &&f-V /-/&'*' S

1

/£?

? " ^^

——

yy- _ I _AX*C-7^ I

1

: ————— 1±1

I

—— *^

ii

i

-

——

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC. JOB NO.! L

* PROJECT

1LOCAT1C

'. CREW Cl-s I Samplti L "-•

i L.* Ej Ii •

! • —1 • I'si —

!<o 1*r"° L

* g-' S ''•v,il

to**

\ J.1 gO

1 ~tnV-

§

1 11 cua

I I1 3O

1 !reI s1 w

1

11

-

1t—


£ .N . . . . . . .

41EF / /^^/ HFLPPR &° *O«0th

t>

,

a

3

4

5

6

7

B

B

ID

11

12

13

14

15

16

T?

IB

19

ao

21

22

23

L-"d

*fi£~

Q£}*> j& ~otBORING NO / O** f7 it

ELEVATION _ rZ^.***"^

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT. INS.G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.

G.W. VOLUMES X^A/ /?*

D«.W So" D«cf»ption P.n«rMlono!

Ch»ng» | Density, Moisture. Color. Taxiurt. «te. ) Blows /6"

ttt*. . £^-**£> j

\

£

r <",-,? s,t.>. +*•>**- j ——

f"S"*> *'

———— E=1^ -^-& £<i •

———— P\—

———— 1=

———— 1

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS,GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

PATP ^-5/- &f^ LOG OF SOIL BORING

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW O1 C«mal*1"""

hrCD

w

•S

a0)

n

F•c

^5^^aoooco*•>£*"•

c_onw**a>cVa.«£*-3O

SPaw*-w

;".

".

-

|I—

5"^• £TtM

<IEF ' l/6£y HELPER ^OX/?/TD*Ott\

0

1

2

3

4

6

«

7

8

0

ID

11

13

13

14

15

16

17

IS

IS

20

21

2?

23

24

LWd

-

Ovottt Collof

C*»»n9« ( D»r»ttv, Moiftur

•7V"

/Z '<?"

DMcriptton

n. folor. T«x

INL. JOB NO.

• ORINC NO 7C&/7 ~

ELEVATION —

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSO.W. ENCOUNTERED AT 7 FT. ^^ INS.O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.C.W, AFTER COMPLETION ^7 FT. O |NS.O.W, AFTER MRS. FT. INS.G.W. VOLUMES S&&£f/ X

ff

turit *tc. ) Blowt/6"

«/X. X>»"^ < '"-/' /•'*«• ^"^ | ———

——— • N*

-

/V/F/5, J>/ix>0 /$s£&is«s

———— 1^1

•

£/S3y ^sttv* s

<•

^^^ £ _ ——

'?/*" <

———^«

•

—

•

———

• ———

————

•

*L

n

.]

f i

i

(1



BORING NO.

ELEVATION .

-93

PROJECT

LOCATION

CREW CHIEF HELPER

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSG.W. ENCOUNTERED AT . FT. ^^ INS.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AfTER COMPLETION <"" FT. £2 (NS.G.W. AFTERG.W. VOLUMES

MRS. FT. INS.

S*mpl*_ El*v.

1f-

-

|-m

-

IP

i

O»Ptti

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

19

20

31

22

23

24

25

L*e«nd

"

D.Dth Soil DMer.»tion ' / F.n.wM.on01

Ch»ng* ( Dtrtsrty, Moifturt, Color. Ttxiur*, «t. ) Blowi /B"

J"^rr

^ '^"

-

/•7M, g^vte f <r''*ty /=-/*.<- s~tc'^T-

——————————— 13

/i /Jt £?x/^ &<tfe&**s £./f*~ *r~

—————— Pi—^y^'^xt^ ^/^ ^xr/^F

•

————————————— 13

i——— : —— : ——————————————————————— | ——

1-

00

Q.03•o

"ra

oft

o

I *-• 8*•

vcQJD.

{ 1I X

* e _«», ,T H.C.— POCK CO«*E

DATE


_ LOG OF SOIL BORING .<r *•

JOB NO,

• OWING NO.

ELEVATION .PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW O-

L El*r.

rihi

2 1

!i•0 1*aV

I"1

1JDto

"o

«>

O~fij.1*Jf

V

a>aa>

O

_c(C

k.(D

in

hl-

-

t-

i-

GROUND WATER OBSERVATION'M _.. _.. _ G.W. f *JCC"^WTeR6P AT +^* FT. C

^^~ J c O.W. ENCOUNTiRED AT *** FT.> / . J>0t**'^ BW AFTeReOM^LtTlQW ^" *T

1 . A /jL*j /Oo L/^ & °'w> AFTew /<W. "^ FT.41EF . , A ' *2 *— * 7 "HPI f^CR ^- &"&fL~ ft w, voi IIMK /V>e»_.". ,. r

0

1

2

3

4

5

fi

7

.

9

10

11

12

13

14

1S

16

17

18

IB

20

21

22

23

24

U~n*D«Oth

el

$'&*

/£-o"

as13 INS,

3 INS.INS.

I Dcnsitv. Moinurt, (elor. Tcxturt, «ie. ) Btowi /C"HI*. *-*•*& f r'*y r<±>- ^c^r-

——— r•=*

, ——— ii•

BI

———— IEEC/*J V C—/^/?' V .s-'TC'S / ~

1

•sr

S^

' / B1 —

:,

—————

——————

M 1 H

3



iII

JOB NO.

BORING NO

ELEVATION

-9S'ROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW C1 Strnpl*L Elwr.

1

L1

if-|

1P

— * 1 1— • i ——————— ———— •• • —— - —————GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOf

1M GW ENCOUNTERED AT /£L_ FT *-• _ J ' G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.

> X • ^- i-^^-S c w AFTER COMPLETION / &L FT <

y /^/-^ \/ /Coi/X;/* G.W. AFTER I^RS-. FT.NIEF „ , A /c5OX WPI PER ty»*^/?^- Gw VOLUMES ^Ss-*^ i .* \.

D*ptt>

O

1

2

3

4

5 '

6

7

8

9

ID

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

IS

20

21

22

23

24

25

L-"",

-

Depthof

Chtnoa

'

/£*->'<

/t'C"

«

~ INS.INS.

~* INS.INS.

. Soil Description / •r r«n«trnlon

( Density, Moittur*, Color. Ttxiurt. «tc. ) Blow* /6"

A^/A * £~sffi''& f fSrj y ^~tt.t~ /^-y c /4 T~

"-

•

^tfXi * ^?^r/s**£) ^s/dVf (,"*-- A^1 ••L--'<r-— 1?^™" X^X^^ e^ _

r//a^ ^^>'u x^xrxsr— --^ —— ^^ /y ^/v£ Q f~~ /^o££. mm

-

i— i

* >

[en

TYPE OF SAMPLE: O.-DtSTURBED U.L.- UNDIST. LINER S.T. -SMELBY TUBE S.S.-SPL1T SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

L

nATC ff_M-&^PROJECT

LOCATIO

CREW Ct-1 S*mpl«L Etw.

rLIi..•

!r.£ I " " "'

*• -3 II. n

- O

- ftS.DIB

'oO

Star

t ta

king

rou

tine

pene

tratio

n te

st o

ne 1

-

i-

I

5",

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS BOpuNO NQ 9&fl/? -LOG OF SOIL BORING

ELEVATIONA- . , ——— , ——————————————————————————————— .

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONN .... ... . e w SNeouNTSRtn AT /••>? FT £

^ -1-. y C.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.S>y . ^•^f'/JS , QIM AFTER COMPLETION /^ FT £!

/A A i ~ &nt/&/* G.W. AFTER MRS. FT.

t&f$y HP1PER CyOr&G. ., . GW UOLUM« jJ-&4tS\/

D«eth

O

1

• 2

3

4

B

6

7

.

a

10

11

13

13

14

16

16

17

IB

19

20

21

22

23

24

2ft

L—— nd

S3 INS.

INS.^ INS.

INS.

0«th Soil Dwcfipilon ' / *.n.u.ti<»no<

Ch»no» ( Density, Moinurt, Color. Ttxturf. «tc. ) Blows /6"

Jl'G~

i& *•

«/A. S~*«>0 f <-«*y S.L*. +*•*!..

'

————— 1——— tf

———————— I•——————

i

1

•

0/}y f&rv x.,e/£7 —• • ' \

—————

—————

-" ~ - \*T' - " " - - |/9 &4/J) & ^~ ST-G (~£L B

I

• ————

1* K

f

\

i

ii

•1]:i\

iI

OTHER —

| MICHIG

1 PROJECT

LOCATIC

' i , -

' ^»

AN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS BO*«NG NO _9&3/7 —LOG OF SOIL BORING

_ ELEVATinro$ t± . —————————————————————————————

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOr

VJ C.W ENCOUNTERED AT ^ FT ^

.^^ V G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT.^/". £>&LSJ '^S G.W. AFTER COMPLETION ^ FT ^

CREW CHIEF , A/iSC?/- HEIPER &P>/t9£- __ OW- VOLUMES A/ft.rf ^ y

\ L'EE*

1 I

1 1—; v

! V-' I> n — — -

'•1 ~\*\ <u 1i*iL= Sg| :• • - L

i

ij2| ..^3 HB

(0

i- 0

I °i J,* o>| §

il ^* C* & *ij Ii* c

'1 _C ———————

i i!l id;L *l —\ r 1- 1 ra• 1 *"|1 t/3

i:

il ——t!k 1

D

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IB

IS

20

21

22

23

24

75

L^nd

'•

JS

-* INS.

_ INS.INS.INS,

D-th Soil D«CMOiton / p.r,.Ultion

Ch«no» ( Dtntity. Moinuri, Color. T»xturc, tic. ) Blowi IS"

<9'0"

l?'0"

-

rt/A, &>*># f <r',iy r<^ S~t*<±>

*

—————————— I

• " ,

CSAv A&rt, +-,£»**-*r ^ I

•^— — ^™

J4~s * *z: j/~i -* XT ^r& £*& BS*f /HJS2S * *^ * * *^ B —————

E

'

97

MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS,GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

T>ATP __^- A/ - C'S. LOG OF SOIL BORING

PROJECT

LOCATIC

CREW a1 S*rrtpl«L_ El*v.

b[-.1

!°rfi>

\ ~_>~ 1•D W

"-C 1- ^1 1

-•§•-c •E 1ilow

101

o*rf

•»*

c,0•Maw»*

C

aV

1

1rIB*•>to

-

1'

i-

£ ,w —— : ——

<IEF //Ô/ HF1PPR Ô*//*^.

Depth

O

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

B

9

10

11

12

13

14

19

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

L nd

,

-

INC, J09 NO.

• ORINC NO ^&&-/7 ~"

ELEVATION . .

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSo.w. ENCOUNTERED AT /^ FT. t^ INS.G.w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.G.W. AFTER COMPLETION /^ FT. tfp INS.G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.G.w. VOLUMES £/&/$£/ \S

?c

Dw* *«>» D«eription / P.n.tr«tionof

ChcnoB ( Dtntitv, Moiitur«, Color. T*xturt. «tc. 1 Blowt /6"

/&'*"

/ft?*

Htfi.* *r'+v£> f c-*'s*ty ,- /u- s-retiT-'

M/z/?* ^s9*S/> *2 S£dss*S

--\^^Â

————— 1

————— 1

£//>V &^r ^*,*

——— ^

——————

J —————

S / t

/•?'£^J er "'^

•

——————

——————

1——1

———

—————

1

]t

)-)]]

]j1]i1jh

}

DATE



JOS NO.

BORING NO.

ELEVATION

1 PROJECT

LOCATIC

[ -r-<i•,i!

REW ClUmpl*El«v.

«^

i 1i fcl ——

1 1 ———————

*•10 i

1 - •! •&[rzl•*« 1

I- c

•*w 1I P 1!^r°> §f &

Ij4**ID

!ft£Vae>

1 ' S2o0)

I EJC5rto1 *

1I

I-

-

L1

1i

1

— • f *— y ——————————————— ' —— — ————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATIOr

1W ,_ .__ , , C W ENCOUNTERED AT / XT' FT d

^•^ V G.W. ENCOUIMT6RED AT FT, ^>X • £*&**>/,» _ GW. AFTEH COMPLETION ^ ^ FT ——

/ ^ /9 .y j?l-*,s * -* Q-w- AFTER HRS. FT.^IFP /X^/2 / MF. PFR frOf*-*. G w VOLUMES A/r_- v^y y

D«Dth

0

1

2 .

3

4

6

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

IS

16

17

18

10

2O

21

22

23

24

25

L*0*n0

-

JS

-- INS.^ INS.' INS,

INS.

D»th Sot. D^Mptio* / P.n.u,Tlono>

Ch«np* ( Dvruitv, Moisturi, Color. Tvxtutt. «ic. ) BIowi /6"

/?'?"

//•<?"

/-?/A* £~*+v£> f frty ,r*n- /uyr/ir-

——————————— P——————————— 1——————————— 1

——

/rvfva ^rt^n &>s?&<^ss t^s& T —

^r/ ^K ^X^-X-^K. /^/^x^> •I i——————— f ———————————————— 1 ——

S5'*^& tf-/cr .4^^^?i

i

i— iOTHCB—

DATE

KICHIGAK TESTIKG ENGINEERS. INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

PROJECT

LOCATION

CREW CHIEF


G.w. ENCOUNTERED AT /£^ ". & <NSG.w. ENCOUNTERED AT ^^ FT. INSG.W. AFTER COMPLETION J 3_ T~\, & INS

CW. AFTERG.W. VOLUMES

.HAS. INS

1Ei

10

11

- !i - .1*

16

17

18

19

30

21

22

33

ii MICHIGAN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

LOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS"^ ^s

ENCOUNTERED AT S.G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT

-

G.W. AFTERG.W. VOLUMES

CREW CHIEFD»Pth

/-?/*, jr's+w f

KICH1G

\ PROJECT

LQCATIC

C

i

I;•s i*1

REW C*

____

S|

11—f ^

1. i

i1O)

o,0n'ooV

6V-

C

!c.

.EoO)

(G

*•>

*Bto

15—

-

ii

-

AN TESTING EKBIHFFRS, m."" ""«/«." ------GEOPHYSICAL ENGUJEEBE ORINO NO 3&£/7—/OiLOG OF SOIL BORING

S /i: , —— _ ———————————————GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

fj ,, „ , , . . , . nw fcwCOUNTtREO AT *"7 FT ^? i*-?--^ .. y r G w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS

S> 7". 'C't-' -S „ . , . , _ S«U AFTER COMPLETION "^ FT" <"> IW^

4|pp A/C'O/ HPIPFR frOX/r/ —— BMy VOLUMES /rfajf^tJ (/

0

1

2

3

,

ft

6

7

8

Ct

10

11

13

13

14

IS

16

11

1 IB

——— '

I

i

i

IS

20

21

22

33

\\ •»

L^d

'

Owth Soil DMCrlpi.0n ' r.n.ir.iion01 ' 1

Ch»t»9» | Dvmrty, Motfiun . Color. T«ntu»«. «tc. ) Blow* /S**

-

7&"

tt/X. , g^s+vte f I"'**' y /- rt-t~ ,A-j*>/iT- i

_ 1I —

— *r\i— j1—— ———————————————— | — J

/ ^A ^Xxv^ ^xr £* iX / -T" • t^

1 — J

/**>"

i

j-J

£V/J y ^»€5 i/ A*S& s s ?~" " i- ;i^^j

,r 1 —— I/p'' &*£> O/^ sSe C^z |i_i- «

i u1 'r - - - - - - • • - " ' ----- - - . - . . . . |. .. >

h-1t t•

-— —

—i ! |- -.

L

foi piif L

KICHIG^Tf /' *+* * tv fs.

ROJECT

OCATIC

j| CREW Oji »,

!*I1

•

IS

ill- 0.- a;

i i

1 8• ' ta-

(u

I t!o

i iocI cu

C.

I V.fC

re

1 II

i-"1"j'1 ___ , —

•r —— ' —;ii\

i;1

-

• " **"

'J — K — — -- ——— _ __

AN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC. *.«."" '^GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS BOR.NO NO 9 &*/*-*"LOG OF SOIL BORING

~> t £ , i _______ ' ————————————— • ————————— • — • ————— -iGROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

^ • ' — ___ „ C.W. ENCOUNTERED AT 4" FT. ^ IM£

- ^ J G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT . FT. -^ INS.•£> ~7~' &*&*<" J> _ G.W. AFTER COMPLETION & FT. tMfi

1 A /} , /"' S ~ <• G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.41PF A/CJO/ HELPFR fZ'&l/fiyf^ fi w VDLLJMEB fafy^ LS y

0

1

2

3

4

S

6

7

e

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

IBi!

19

ife

20

21

22

23

C^C

-

D.oth Soli Dncripnon r.n.t..tlo«

C «np« ( Dcmity. Moiiturt. Color. T»«tute. »tc. ) Blowi /6"

-

&'0»

-

//- -^"

_

A-7/A » ^TV^-^^ *' f~'*"*- y /• /i*- x*-f^'i*

B1 _B

1 ../*?&£>* Z>*0*'£> &<&s<*s**s is~"z~j? £ris£^£. & f t-*

\ —BBK.

^//?y £%s£Gt«S*S ,*-** 0fS 7 ——— ('

____ :

4^- <X-^ x^>v^> ^?/^ s&£>£~& E

BEi

1 i

1 ^t \

Ii

———

PpB

1

h~

DATE

PROJECT

LOCATION


_ " LOG OF SOIL BORINGELEVATION

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS// j-*^

G W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. (KSG.W. AFTER COMPLETION Sf FT. O INSG.W. AFTER . MRS. FT. INS.

Sol' Dncripiion

( D«n»itv. MomuK, Color. Tixturt. *te. ) Blows /C"

co

C£

fc

I '•eu& iO ,

re*-CO

r

15

1C

6E

i

*

10

11

12

13

14

I

iki

17

18

IB

2D

21

23

23

.ifi!';i;;

W

i «1 ST

T5

|t*>

1 0o<•->

I =1 !s

1 I1 !

C

I \i !; re

tn

I

HICHIG)ATE •- ffV.r, PJ>:, .

ROJECT

OCATtC

REW C

I11"-

g

. — -•

i|_-1

Ii

-

cit

<~

- - - - - - _ __^ • "•"""•""' •••••u^ ^ ^ ^ ^"" J """"*••— - - _. _ , _ ^^^^ " " ~- '"III ... _ ..

AN TESTING ENGINEERS, INC.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS .*.,.,»• *,« 9r>#/V— /HDntV>lL> IV U ^^t ' «

LOG OF SOIL BORING^ C\.ÛATIOK

/ /- , . —————— . ————————————————— — ———— - ———————————————— ,


IN __ , GW ENCOUNTERED AT & FT 1^5 INS.

^ J G w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.£sj". £*-&fJ:> , . , , . . , Cw AFTER COMPLETION £J FT. 1WK

/ f . f l l /"_ y - *• G.W. AFTER .MRS FT. INS.

/oOx HPIPPR &"°^*r: . B-« vOLUMESyW>^V

0

12

3

4

6

6

7

B .

S

10

11

13

13

"**

15

" 1 -ii i *i i8

1 !

1 1 "fc

21

i 7,1

1 »

1

i-____L.2*___

uâ

-

Owth Soil DMC'iDMDt. f f.n«r.tion

Cn»n9* ( OftnsiTv, Motttur*. Colot. Tkxiure. Me. 1 Blowi ^6"

8'Q"

I/<G*>

•

* I ———————I iI _______

I

M££), SA*ifo Q&OWAJ i*jt&?~ tîs&t, &/ 1~ \

i1 __ i

' ' \ —[ !

/AS ' &fS& &/^ /->£o C& \ '1 i

&!

i ——!—

- . : ———

1 ———

—\ . i—

i—1—

-- eutti BY TUBE S.S-SfLIT SPOON R.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

DATE

1 PROJECTJ

* LOCATION

KICHIGAK TESTING ENBIHLhH*. INU.GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERSLOG OF SOIL BORING

JOB


{ D.nnty. Moinuf*. Color. T»»iu

i KICHIG

J PROJECT

| LOCATIC

ji CREW O

jL^r-i

h•« '

l;|'|;**? Q'f "

!l|'

. r

1 ;' 5o-D!i1 I• t!

£

~V

!

QJ

C

a:

1V.£

. re

rii—s15 ——— .

iA

-

Ir~

<r

AK TESTINR EKGIKEERS. INC, «.«..GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS fcomNG NO q&A/j-jLOG OF SOIL BORING

f £- • . ———— . ————— . ————————————————————— iGROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS

IN -» CW fNCOUNTEREO AT /^i FT. -^? (NS^.^ y J "" • iv.. -* G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INS.

^> / . ^-£>i- /_S r .; GW AFTER COMPLETION / 02. FT. -O tN&

/ /f /2 V/ /Cft/X- * C.W. AFTER /I?*5'- FT- INS

4IEF A/^)/>y HFIPER tT'O^^/^.. Gw VOLUMES /^^^^

o

1

3

3

,

S

6

•J

B

.

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

«

t 18

r~1 70

31

23

33

•34

L.p.nfl

DMTh • So>l DMCription ' p*n*v»iionCh*"ff* ( Dcniitv. Moinurt, Color. Texture. «ie. ) BIOWI /6"

————————

rt>°"

/t •*"

l£»0 «

^^ "^ ' ; ^ / 'I

"l*K ' '. • •

• " - % Em, •?* *" KK • - ___

———

^•»

B•, B

BH

:

BP

i"*

^*" • • • --1 _ . _ . _ _ _

* "" SBE

<=,«/ a.^C'^^f ^0,£-r- ___

f* I rf /I G? * fr f ^**f ff r J> i* \

^ B ___ " 1* /?' £A/<P ff/z* //?£&• E —— !

" I -

————

1 ——

APPENDIX I

OBSERVATION WELL

BOREHOLE LOGS

MICHIGAN "TESTING EKGIKEERS. INC. JOI'

i 1 • <? *b£ - ' IL•<• DM? V- -rfftC- .->-

'1 PROJECT

LOCATK

, CREW Ci

"J s

l -1 1-PIIL.* j*• ' !

£ 1OJ »

Oo

1?I1 i

•r"

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS ^^ fa/b/:3LOG OF SOIL BORING "OR-NO *. . _ s^

__ E^ EVAt ION ._. ...

/ /• , . ————————————————————————————————————————————————— .

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS-)fO - , .,. G-W t NCOUNTSHED AT ^T FT. ^ fNt;

. ^^_ _ V G.w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. )NS^* / • &•&**'/-$ ._,.„„_.,.„,,.,,.._ S.W AFTER COMPLETION FT ,N5

/ >i /J , S**n S " ** C.W. AFTER MRS. FT. - IMSMIFF A / O O X HE1PPR "-0^/r/— Gw VOLL,MES Jfarfty

0

i

2

3

4

S

6 ^

7

e

t-

10

11

12

13

14

IS

II 5 : 16

if: i „

li ——18

\i ; »1 11 " jg- ^r- tra

1^^

—

30

22

23

ii 25

L.»*ndO.«h Soil D«cnp,.0* -" ,>.n..r«ion

C* iCh»r»9» ( Dvntitv. Moniuft. Color. Tvxturr, «lc. ) Blow* /B"

S'6>»

^/x.jr*-^ ' -"'-'"^ ^.'At. ^-'^/-' -. —— !

| —————— j

I— •| ———

5 !

Us£L*7~ £**4*v/) ' \

9<o"* . _

R ;C/jA y <&c%* v . • - - e i

/ * B!**>£>7~*7~C>s**^ S> /C" t **/&-£-(- & ^

j _ . ——

^

——— !

1 !

S ______ "

O J

! ————————

• ' i !

————

g ____ 1

1I

————I

! ! ;

1 —

T E S T I N G E N G I N E E R S ; INC.•

r22-

«TP -0-33- 6<PROJECT!

LOCATIC

CREW C1 Svmpl*L Elw.

I

CO

w>™

*'e**

ii-E*l

JD(C

"oo

Ing

roul

ine

pene

irolio

n te

st o

ne

re*«

k.tcLO

h

• -•

-

1|—

-

fE —

^^

GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS

LOG OF SOIL BORING

3N ————— : —————————————————

UMPF //^3/2/ HFIPER &Ot/#jC-

Daoth

0

1

2

3

4

6

6

7

8

B

10

11

12

13

1*

IS

16

17

IB

5fe

1

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

L^d D*et*> Koli' O*«crlp)ienof

Ch»np« ( Dtnsrtv. Moiftuti. Color. T««

7.0"

/0""

/-?/A * jTVf'V^; ^ fs*~y ,- /---.. .

• ORING NO _PV^V^*7

CI.EVATION _


c.w. ENCOUNTERED AT FT. INSG.W. AFTER COMPLETION FT. INS

G.W. VOLUMES yAvTV^X

luft, etc. ) Biowc /6"

**" /U**'ir"

-

k/yTT-

~w

•

I j

tf/X/- d^T^X^^^^ 1——__ ———————— . ——— | ——

"—

> l

•

B£

-

———

BE^

_____

_

1

)

JI1J

bjjjjjj

;f .

!H-

it

iC - s

CO

II1 o

1 a.'' Xi

_-"c5I cIE* o

I "re

.1' I

1!.2I s1 !c.

il1 1

1

WILFUL

- * ?y *ffi P '•DATF - - tr&*r & f> .PROJECT

LOCATI

:REW cSamel*

_ tl*v.

f

ri*i—1 ——

i

i

.

1ft

<rF —

AR ICOimU CfiGlHUIin^, (fib. JOB *o _GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS L/1*/' CBORING MO rv W *OLOG OF SOIL BORING ~ " '^^

_ ELEVATION/ **- _____ , ————————————————————————— _________ — •— -

GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONSpw , ._,..,..,.,.., GW PWCOUNTERED AT y *, e-f ^ INS

,„--__ y _ G.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ' FT. INS.^. / . ^•^t^-'-S _ ,„._.. , .,„ GW A F T E R COMPLETION ^7 (N5

// A/^V/ /Cot/^y" G.W. AFTER MRS. FT. INS.W1FF At&&Y HFLPER ^ °*^/»/— e.w. VOLUMES ^ ^ .. ix

O«Dih

0

1

2

3

a

5

•6

7

8

S

ID

11

12

13

14

IS

16

„

18

19

20

21

22

23

?*

L.p.nS D*othof

/£ ' Gr

1 / ' / "

Soil DMcrtpiien / -

( Dfcnirty, Moiltut*. Colo*. Taxtuft, *tc. ) Blowi /E"

X "~

•

•B

^ "™* ^~^l**i

•

iBB•y~*& ~~ ^?y*^r>

j

—EpE

!

1 1

^7/ V £.WX^" *•/^

•J^07~~?&*** & s*^ £*/4^Z.£ /<£ '&

1 —•i—

• ' —— .—

E

(1

i 1!

c

b1

•X-6;

1IO)

O-D(0

"oC

wcc«cc_cR

nicc.V_c"

5wo>cn

*••t_ID

«

.. • „ KICHIG3ATE_J^-^3£> £fV

ROJECT.OCATK

:REW cfS?

Iii1—lE ——

!I—

i

t

1*

:

E

^f

AN TESTING ENGINEERS. INC. ». «'GEOPHYSICAL ENGINEERS Jb/V../ ^

• ORINC NC KT- i^r ' fiLOG OF SOIL BORING **-/•- — K-i<— ELEVATION

/ £: , - ,— ————————————————— — ————— , •,GROUND WATER OBSERVATlOf

•\$1 • „ __ BW fNÔUNTtREO AT ^Z-X ff <f

• ^^^^ ,/ O.W. ENCOUNTERED AT ' FT.^> X . ^GftSS-S m m n W AFTER COMP1ETIQN r-f

t /> fl 1 /* X - * C.W, AFTER .MRS. FTÎFP A /OO/ HELPER tirOf/*/-.. a w, WOL UMES V... ^ /> tx

0

1

2

9

4

5

> e

7

a

»

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

16

!19

20

21

22

33

94

25I

L^-d01

. Chine*

"

/'^"

t'6"

OS

^ INS.

INS.INS iINS .

Boll Dftcrlption

{ Density. Moitturn. Color. Ttxturt. «tc. t Blow* /E"

A?/A, ^T^^^ / ^-'^->' /- /î /*-*£> /iT- J '

' 1

———————— [Z•__ j

iX£^? -S>M^> B ,. /j

1 I1J->l

£'$ y /^s±7£><*s/s B II 1

& c TTC s-i &/- ' : <X '/ £ '6 " | ——— 1

T

]J

1;B

____ J|

^™^^^* 1

__ ji

*l ——— "^

—— i— ;•— *^ •

i

B :i» i

i

— ;i — i1 1

i ———————————————— pzJiIRBEO U.L.-UNDtST. LINE R S.T. - SMI: LB v ' "TUBE S.S.-SPL17 SPOON B.C.-ROCK CORE OTHER-

APPENDIX J

ANALYTICAL G.C./M.S. DATA

FOR SEPTEMBER 21, 1982

SAMPLING PROGRAM

Conestoga RoversERG Project #8996October 19, 1982

ERG Sample Number:Client ID:

Compound

Saturated Hydrocarbons

C8C9ClOCllCj2C13Cl4Cl5Cl6C17C18

Unsaturated Hydrocarbons

CgClOCiiCl2Cl3 ,Cl4Cl5Cl6Cl7Cl8

C20

f

79731982-21-IL

J*L

3.1^ 3.0"

4.83.49.21.7«2.52.41.0

— —

0.232.04.34.15.62.72.92.50.400.420.48

f

79732982-21-2L

JiL

0.463.10.562.93.06.71.85.92.84.42.5

f-.—2.62.83.44.25.24.45.62.01.0

•

79733982-21 -5L

JSL

3.13.10.225.01.28.75.31.41.22.3

v 0.74

1.41.43.72.29.24.33.12.92.60.870.61

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH GROUP. INC.



Compound

Cyclic Hydrocarbons

C13

Cl5Cj6CjyC18C19C20pentylcyclohexanebutyl cyclohexanehexylcyclohexaneoctyl cycl ohexane

Aromatlcs

C3-subst1tuted benzenesC4-subst1tuted benzenesCs-substltuted benzenesphenylalkanes MW 162phenylalkanes MW 176phenylalkanes MW 190phenylalkanes MW 204phenylalkanes MW 218phenylalkanes MW 232phenylalkanes MW 246phenylalkanes MW 260

•

79731982-21-IL

J*L

3.41.41.21.2....0.280.502.01.02.43.1

2.03.8——0.580.701.0—0.18--0.19

..„„,,, t

79732982-21 -2L

J*L

2.92.01.81.5__«—1.30.571.93.1

0.340.34--0.551.11.0--0.280.280.31

1

79733982-21 -5L

J*L

1.80.83----0.320.360.381.30.831.82.2

1.62.81.50.770.820.830.880.120.270.280.11

•VlRC-r, —— -UAL,— -. 3UP,



Compound

Aromatlcs (continued)

(1-methylnonyl)-benzene{1-methyldecyl)-benzenedecahydronaphthalenemethyl.decahydronaphthalenetetrahydronaphthalenemethyl-tetrahydronaphthalenesCg-tetrahydronaphthalenesnaphthalenemethyl naphthalenesCg-naphthalenesC3-naphthalenesphenanthrenemethyl-phenananthrenesC2-phenanthrenesC3-phenanthrenes

NOTES:

All results reported as % of total*MW = molecular weight

79731982-21-IL

0.470.60

0.701.51.71.5

3.34.22*10.721.20.53

79732982-21-2L

0.701.00.180.380.721.60.98

1.53.42.50.931.9

79733982-21-51

0.310.440.18

1.12.31.6.0.603.03.5.1.60.550.730.370.10


II1IIi _1I APPENDIX K

I ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES DATA

iSEPTEMBER 21, 1982

SAMPLING PROGRAM

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

for

Presearch, Inc.

Three oil samples were received on September 22, 1982 for chromatographic analysis. Thesamples were labelled as follows: /

Sample Description Laboratory Number Type

982-21-1 2229-01 Oil/water982-21 -2 2229-02 Oil/water982-21-5 2229-03 Oil/water

The samples were received under chain-of-custody. The original custody records receivedwith the samples are attached.

Results

The chromatograms of each of the three oils are attached. In addition, the chrornatogramof Sample 982-b-l(a) (2210-05), reported in a letter dated September 21, 1982, is shownfor comparison. AIJ oils are comparable with both heavy and light ends present. Theboiling range of the oils is approximately 350 to 696 degrees F. This boiling rangecorresponds to diesels and kerosenes.

Methodology

All three samples were light enough to be injected directly into a gas chromatograph (GC).Boiling ranges were estimated by comparison to a standard of linear alkyl hydrocarbonsanalyzed under identical conditions.

9/30/82

Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory 5530 Marshall Sueei. Arvada. CO 80002 (303) 421 -66 n

^k»V^-rf\ -/\ ~^f

CHROMATOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF OILS

982-b-l(a) (2210-05)

(2229-01)

(2229-02)

982-21-5 (2229-03) o

j3

jj

i

APPENDIX L

ROCKY MOUNTAIN ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES DATA

OCTOBER, 1982

SOIL/LIQUID SAMPLES

November 3,1932

Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory

Mr. Don RobinsonConestoga-Roversc/o Hooker Chemical & PlasticsBuilding L-lNiagara Falls, NY 14302

Dear Mr. Robinson:

Enclosed is the report of the analyses of the ten samples you submitted.

Please call me if you have any questions.

Best regards,

O. Sohn LogsdonManager, Organic Chemistry

OJL/blsEnclosure (1)

cc: Mr. Leslie GoodierPresearch, Inc.

RMA #2281

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

for

Conestoga-Rovers

On October 18, 20 and 22, 1982, a total of ten samples were received for analysis. Thesamples were received under chaln-of -custody and were labelled as follows: j

Sample Description Laboratory Number Date Received Type ]

1082-13-51 2281-01 October 18, 1982 Soil _,1082-12-52 2281-02 October 18, 1982 Soil )1082-1- - October 20, 1982 Soil j

October 20, 1982 SoilOctober 20, 1982 Soil ^

1082-19-3 2281-031082-19-4 2281-041082-19-5 2281-05

1082-19^6 2281-06 October 20, 1982 Oil1082-19-1 2281-07 October 20, 1982 Soil1082-19-2 2281-08 October 20, 1982 Soil10S2-13-1L 2281-09 October 20, 1982 Water1082-21-1 2281-10 October 22, 1982 Soil

Results

Chromatograms for each sample extract are attached. Also attached is a copy of theinitial Chromatograms for samples reported on September 21, 1982.

1082-19-4 The sample contains components in the boiling range of 421 - 736" F. Thechromatogram shows some correlation with the heavier ends in past sample 982 b-1 (a).The lighter ends, before "C" however do not provide a good comparison. There is alsocomparison of the heavier ends of this sample to those in Samples 1082-13-51, 1082-13-1L,1082-19-2 and 1082-19-3.

1082-13-51 This sample contains components in the boiling range of 345 - 736" F. Thechromatogram shows correlation with past sample 982 b-1 (a). Because the correlation isacross the entire range of components, these two samples are probably of the same origin

Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory 5530 Marshall Street. Arvada. CO. 80002 (303) 421 -6611

I

III

i

and have been exposed to similar weathering conditions. This sample also correlates wellwith Sample 1082-13-1L. The heavier ends above "B" and "C" correlate with 1082-19-2,1082-19-3 and 1082-19-4. This Implies that these samples are of similar origin but havebeen exposed to more extreme weathering or loss of light ends.

1082-19-6 This sample contains components that boil in the range of 548 ->774* F. This.is a heavier hydrocarbon than the previous samples. It does correlate with past sample9982.

1082-13-1L, 1082-19-2 and 1082-19-3 These samples all correlate to past sample 982* b-l(a). The boiling ranges for 1082-13-1L and 1082-19-2 are similar at 345 - 696° F.

While sample 1082-19-3 has a higher range of 345 - 774* F. Sample 1082-19-3 alsocorrelates with past sample 9-82- 1C.

t 1082-21-1 This sample contains a series of hydrocarbons boiling from 421 - 755*F.| The pattern of these components does not correlate with any of the other samples.

1082-19-5. 1082-13-52^1082-19-1 These samples do not show any patterns thatcorrelate with other samples.

Methodology

The soil samples were extracted with 5 ml of pentane per 2 grams of sample. The oil wasdiluted in pentane and the water sample was extracted with pentane. The pentaneextracts were analyzed by gas chromatography using a flame ionization detector. Thepentane solvent peak appears at the beginning, of each sample chromatogram. Boilingranges were estimated by comparison to a standard of linear alkyl hydrocarbons analyzedunder the same conditions.

11/3/82

CHROMATOGRAPHIC COMPARISON RESULTS (11/3/82)

^y^*

1082-21-1

(2281-10)

1082-19-5(2281-05)

1082-13-52(2281-02)

1082-19-1(2281-07)

II


1082-13-S1 (2281-01)

B


1082-19-6 (2281-06)

C D EA B

CHROMATOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF OILS AND EXTRACTS (9/21/82)

1L

9825-1 (a) (2210-05)

UGW-16-2C (2210-03)

9-S2-1C (2210-02)

UGW-16-3C (2210-04)

9982 (2210-01)


1082-19-4 (2281-04)

i

3


B

1082-13-1L(2281-09)

1082-19-2(2281-08)

1082-19-3(2281-03)

; ADDITIONAL ANALYTICAL RESULTStfor*

i Conestoga-Rovers

1 On November 5 and 8, 1982, additional review was performed of the results reported onNovember 3, 1982. The following statements summarize the findings.

*;* 1082-21-1 The distribution of hydrocarbons in this sample corresponds to that of No. 2| ^- heating oil.

1082-19-3, 1082-19-», 1082-19-5 Samples 1082-19-3 and 1082-19-* show correpondencei of some components between "C" and "EH. Sample 1082-19-5 did not show a comparison

because the components of interest were not concentrated enough. The three peaks couldI be background from the extraction solvent because the sensitivity of the analysis was4

increased to try and detect the pattern. Samples 1082-19-3 and 1082-19-* correlate some} with 9-81-1C in the area of "C" and "D". Lighter ends however are not related. Their* origin could be of the same source or different sources producing a similar product or

using similar feedstocks.

— 1082-19-6 This sample shows a pattern and boiling range similar to those of a No. 6 oil.This sample also shows correlation with the past sample 9982.

1 1Q82-13-SI. 1082-13-1L, 1082-J3-S2 Samples 1082-13-S1 and 1082-13-1L correlate over* the entire range of peaks detected. These samples are most likely from the same source.

!

Sample 1082-13-S2 did not contain enough recoverable material in this analysis to show acomparison. The two largest peaks may originate from analytical background because thesensitivity of the test was increased to try and detect a pattern.

f1

1082-19-1 Not enough material was recovered in the analysis to show a pattern.

1082-19-2 This, sample shows slight correlation with 1082-13-1L. The heavier endsT abgyc--HB" and "C^-snow correlation in component peaks at similar retention times buti their responses are somewhat different. Possibly, 1082-13-1L contains additional

Rocky Mountain Analytical Laboratory 5530 Marshall Street. Arvada, CO. 80002 (303) 421-6611

components that mask the pattern of 1082-19-2. Possibly 1082-19-2 has additionalcomponents. The correspondence is present but weak. This sample also shows a slightcorrespondence with 1082-19-4 (reported earlier). This relationship is also weak.

11/8/82

jjj

a

Instruments Ltd.

October 29, 1982

-r ^ x u Rec'dT. CrutcherAssoc.Conestoga-Rovers Ass'n • -»v - b 1982651 Col by Dr.,Waterloo, OntarioCanadaN2V 1C2

Dear M. Crutcher,

Thank you for your inquiry regarding our groundwater instrumentationas advertised in the Ground Water Monitoring Review. Enclosed is abrochure describing our MP System.

If you have a specific project in mind or wish more detailedinformation on our products, please call us.

] Sincere!

i Erik Rehtlane

ER/deEnclosure

507 East Third Street, North Vancouver, B,C. V7L1G4 Telephone (604)984-4215 Telex 04-352606

CRA LTD - FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM - Records ...

Documents

Transcript of CRA LTD - FIELD INVESTIGATIVE PROGRAM - Records ...