An Introduction to Balanced Socrecard
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
3 -
download
0
Transcript of An Introduction to Balanced Socrecard
- 3 -
Measurement Motivates Behaviour
“What you measure is
what you get”
“It’s not what you
expect … it’s what you inspect”
“If you can measure it,
you can manage it”
The Balanced Scorecard’s (BSC) fundamental premise is that measurement motivates behaviour
- 4 -
The scorecard differs substantially from traditional measurement approaches
• The BSC’s focus is on factors which create long-term economic value in an organisation, for example:– Customer focus.
– Organisational learning.
– Business processes.
• Traditional accounting measures are by definition backward looking:– Financial measures only reflect the results of actions already taken.
– Do not provide an indication of future financial performance.
– Do not indicate desired performance.
– Do not provide a basis for planning and target setting.
- 5 -
Criteria For A Good Balanced Scorecard
A Good Balanced Scorecard will “Tell the story” of your strategy
Cause and Effect Relationships:• Every measure should be part of a “cause
and effect” chain to determine if the measures correctly represents and drives the strategy.
Linked to Financials:• Every measure selected should ultimately
Drive Performance.• Focus on factors that create long-term
value.• A balance of lead and lag indicators:
Measures that Create Change:• Measures must cause the organisation to
change its behaviour in some way.
CompanyStrategy
As-Is
Vision
- 6 -
Clarifying and
Translating the Vision
and Strategy
Strategic Feedback and Learning
Planning and Target Setting
Communication and
Linking
• Feedback system used to test the hypotheses on which strategy is based.
• Strategy development is a continuous process.
• Stretch targets are agreed.• Investments are determined by the strategy.• Annual budgets are linked to long-range plans.
• Goal alignment exists from top to bottom.
• Open communication of strategy is basis for employee empowerment
BalancedScoreboard
The Balanced Scoreboard creates a strategic framework for action
• The strategy is the reference point for the entire management process.
• The shared vision is the foundation for strategic learning.
- 7 -
The Balanced Scorecard translates vision and strategy into four dimensions of performance
“When we achieve our vision, how will our organisation learn and
grow ?”
“When we achieve our vision, how will we look
to our business partners ?”
“When we achieve our vision, how will our internal business
processes operate ?”
“When we achieve our vision, how will we look to our shareholders ?”
Vision
Customers and Partners
Financial/Shareholder
Internal Processes
Learning and Innovation
- 8 -
For each of the four dimensions, objectives, measures and targets are explicitly defined
Financial / ShareholderObjectives Measures Targets
Customers and PartnersObjectives Measures Targets
Internal ProcessesObjectives Measures Targets
Learning and InnovationObjectives Measures Targets
Vision
- 9 -
The linkage between the four dimensions is crucial in ensuring long-term success
• Financial• Client satisfaction,
efficient and effective delivery of services will deliver financial results.
• Excellent processes and people will deliver client satisfaction.
• Good people in efficient processes support effectiveness.
• You need good people, people processes and structure to achieve high performance.
Shareholder Value
• Partners / Customers
• Internal Processes
• Learning & Growth
- 10 -
Alignment through the organisation will be achieved by cascading the scorecard
High Level Scorecard
Business Unit or Departmental Scorecards
Individual Scorecards
Shareholder / Parent / Requirements
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
- 11 -
When implemented well, the benefits of Balanced Scorecard can be significant
• Senior executives are focused and aligned around a small number of critical objectives and success measures.
• A simple, single management report makes progress towards financial, customer, internal processes and learning objectives clearly visible.
• The Plan-Do-Review principle establishes clear accountability for achieving objectives, for success and failure
• The BSC implementation establishes a strategic feedback / monitoring system that drives actions to excel in critical performance indicators
Focus
BalancedPerformance
Accountability
ContinuousImprovement
- 13 -
Balanced Scorecard design is only a component of the overall process
Scorecard Design Scorecard Implementation / Roll-out
Strategic Intent
Develop & finalise Objectives
Develop & finalise Measures
Determine baselines and set targets
Incorporate scorecard review as
key item in business management meetings
Manage business according
to scorecard
Review/refine
score-card on a
regular basis
in conjunc-tion with strategy review process
Align/plan initiatives according
to scorecard
Develop and
implement BU and section
scorecards
Ensure scorecard alignment
Review & refine onan ongoing
basis
Manage BU, section etc.
according to
scorecard formatFeedback to high level scorecard to
ensure alignment
Corporate/Shareholder input where relevant
Communicate Scorecard to organisation
Cascade scorecard to individual level. To ensure individual
focus and alignment.Balanced Scorecard
Business Management Process
- 14 -
The Business Management Process (BMP) implements the Balanced Scorecard in a Plan-Do-Review Cycle
Link to Higher Level BSC
Financial
Learningand
Innovation
InternalProcesses
Customersand
Partners
MeasuresTargets
Objectives
Link to Lower Level BSC
Link to Higher Level BMP / Report
Link to Lower Level BMP / Report
ReviewBSC
• Take Action:– Initiatives– Plans – Budgets
• Measure Actuals against Targets
• Compile Report Target
• Plan-Do-Review session
• Determine Root Causes for Variances
• Define Action Steps
PDR Session
- 16 -
We need to have clear and communicated definitions of the BSC components
• Objective:– Statement that defines what we must do to achieve the vision.– Linked to our strategy.
• Measure:– A numeric indicator that will indicate successful achievement of the objective. • Lead indicator – Indicates the likelihood of change (forward looking).• Lag indicator – Indicate that change has occurred (backward looking).
• Target:– Value of the measure that we would like to achieve in a given time frame.– Must be achievable.
- 17 -
Perspective
A “Good” Balanced Scorecard includes objectives, measurements and targets that promote changeExample:
Financial
Customer
Internal
Learning
BusinessObjectives
• Shareholder value
• Profit
• New revenue
• Differentiation
• Strategic alliances
• Customer service• Productivity
• New product development
• Segmentation
• People policy
• Alliance management
• Customer focus
Measurements
• % dividend growth
• Operating Margin
• Revenue from new services
• Target market-share
• Profits from alliances
• Customer satisfaction
• Revenue/work hour
• Product development cycle time
• Number of initiatives targeted at profitable segments
• Management span of control
• Number of “learning” partnerships”
• % management time interfacing with customers
Targets
• CPI + X% annually
• Top quartile
• 25% in three years
• Number one
• $M in five years
• Number one customer rating
• Best-in-class within five years
• Reduced by 50% in two years
• 60% within one year
• Triple in three years
• 10 in five years
• 20% in two years
Accountabilities
• Finance Director• CEO• Business Development Manager
• Marketing Director
• Business Development Manager
• Marketing Director• COO• Research and Development Manager
• Marketing Director
• Human Resources Director
• Business Development Manager
• CEO
. . . and clear accountabilities to ensure ownership.
- 18 -
The objectives define what the organisation must do to achieve the vision
Description of a good objective:
• Linked to, and descriptive of a component of the vision/strategy.
• Relevant to what the organisation wants to achieve.
• Action orientated:– Start statement with a verb.
• Measurable:– there must be a manner in which we can determine success in achieving the objective:
• Clear and concise.
• Understandable to the whole organisation.
• Must be able to assign overall accountability to a single person.
- 19 -
Measures must be the key indicators that register achievement of the objective
The SMART criteria defines a good measure:
• SS imple – relatively easy to access, collate and calculate.
• MM easurable – e.g: number of hours worked, lines installed, etc.
• AA actionable – ability to take action on variances to plan.
• RR elevant – ability to influence that which is being measured.
• TT imeous – must be determined/measured as frequently as
possible, or when relevant.
– the longer the delay in measuring the less the chance to allow timeous/appropriate action.
- 20 -
Targets must be set for each measure, and define goals for the organisation to achieve
Criteria for a good target:
• Must be achievable.
• Provide some stretch for the organisation.
• Set for a good fixed time period.
• Determine intermediate values, to evaluate progress.
• Aligned with what the organisation wants to achieve.
• Supported by and have buy-in of the executive team.
The objectives, measures, targets and accountabilities need to be defined at all levels of the organisation.
- 21 -
Priority: • Effectively Manage Value Adding Processes
Formula:• Weighted ranking of total unit cost of
production + plant reliability index + total staffing index + computerised instrumentation index + total maintenance + sustaining capital index.
Source:• Site Leadership
For each objective and measure we will develop a precise definition . . .
Measure:Cost excellence rating
Formula Notes:• A weighted index that gives a quartile
performance cost excellence position. Weightings to reflect their importance to each business.
• Categories are 1st to 4th quartile• Rankings, as defined by external consultants
at least every other year, but done yearly• A comparative group is defined• Formula to be defined by type of plant
relevant to their business need and value proposition. Weightings may shift over time.
Update Frequency:• Annual
Action to Implement:• Use blend of industry studies (e.g., Solomon, Mastio, Chem Systems, Townsend), and analysis of
one-on-one comparisons vs. leaders.• May also use simplified benchmarks and models, as appropriate.
Effectively Manage Value Adding Processes: Be the low cost provider of products and services by achieving competitive excellence in all our
business processes.
EXAMPLE
Objective:
- 22 -
Perspective: Internal processesMeasure: Cost excellence rating ¦
. . . and an approach to setting targets
Effectively Manage Value Adding Processes: Be the low cost provider of products and services by achieving competitive excellence in all our
business processes.
Objective:
Frequency of Meaningful UpdateMonthly
AnnuallyQuarterly
Measurement definition/formula (See also Measurement Profile):Weighted ranking of total unit cost of production + plant reliability index + total staffing index + computerised instrumentation index + total maintenance + sustaining capital index.Approach to setting targets and/or developing measure [If targets exist, identify source]:Target is to be top quartile. Sites (types of plants) will need to select the key variables, weight them, and choose a suitable external benchmarking methodology. Recommendations need to be agreed by business teams and leadership teamTarget setting responsibility:Manufacturing leadership/SBU
Accountability for results:Manufacturing leadership
Tracking/reporting responsibility:Site leadership
Completion date:1995 (some could be ready by January)
Linkage to Businesses:Through business teams, aligned with SBU strategy
Linkage to BT Streams / Initiatives:ManufacturingCapital investment excellenceSupply chain
EXAMPLE
- 24 -
Generally, BSC objectives focus around key themes in each of the four areas
Financial/Shareholder Themes
• Shareholder value.
• ROI.
• Profitability.
• Turnover/Revenue.
Learning & Innovation Themes
• Attract, retain and motivate employees.
• Clarify and communicate Roles and Responsibility.
• Building skills.• Manage resources
(leadership).• Knowledge management.
Internal Process Themes• Low costs.• Production efficiency.• Quality:
– ISO compliance.• Safety.• Production volume.• Environment.• Process effectiveness.
Customers & Partners Themes
• Retention.
• Satisfaction.
• Value-added to customers.
Vision
- 25 -
The Balanced Scorecard should contain a balance of lead and lag indicators
F1 Meet shareholder expectations
F2 Improve operating performance
F3 Achieve profitable growth
Return on Equity Combined Ratio Business Mix
C1 Improve agency performance
C2 Satisfy target policyholders
Acquisition/Retention(vs. plan)
Acquisition/Retention(by segment)
Agency Performance(vs. plan)
Policyholder Satisfaction Survey
I1 Develop target markets
I2 Underwrite profitablyI3 Align Claims with business
I4 Improved productivity
Business Mix (by segment)
Loss Ratio Claims Frequency Claims Severity Expense Ratio
Business Development (vs. plan)
Underwriting Quality Audit Claims Quality Audit
Headcount Movement Managed Spending Movement
L1 Upgrade staff competenciesL2 Access to strategic
information
Staff Productivity Staff Development (vs. plan) Strategic I/T Availability
(vs. plan)
ObjectivesMeasures
Lead Indicators(Performance Drivers)
Lag Indicators(Core Outcome Measures)
Lear
ning
Inte
rnal
Cust
omer
Fina
ncia
l
- 26 -
AREA PRODUCTION MANAGER
DIRECTOR
ZONE MANAGER
TEAM LEADER
Sample Target for Specific Time Window From To
21hours
19hours
Reduce area cycle time from
22 to 8 days
Reduce overall cycle time from 73 to 28 days
Strategic Business Objective
Reduce zone cycle time from
7 to 3 days
Reduce team cycle time from 30 to 11 hours
5.1days
4.6days
17days
15days
48days
44days
Top-Down and Bottom-Up
LinkedPLAN
ACTUAL
Quarterly Time Window Target
PLAN
ACTUAL
Quarterly Time Window Target
PLAN
ACTUAL
Quarterly Time Window Target
PLAN
ACTUAL
Quarterly Time Window Target
Objectives, measures and targets at each level have to be aligned top-down and bottom-up
Example: CarManufacturer Reduce overall
cycle time from 73 to 28 days
- 27 -
Measures should be cascaded as with this railway utility
• Managing Director
• Functional Managers
• Area Managers
• Department Managers
• Section Managers
• Work Group,Supervisors and Staff
Business objective:“92% of trains to
arrive within 5minutes of published
time”
Punctuality
% leave on time
Maintainschedule
Crewavailable
% trainsavailable
Trains inwrong
location
Trainsrejected byoperations
% trainsavailable
right formed
% trainsoperational
% trainspending
wheel sets
% wheel setsto plan
Wheel lathedowntime
- 29 -
Client Key Issues
TelcoSupp’s vision is to be the most successful local telecommunications solutions provider
• Producer and supplier of products in the telecommunications industry.
• Vision is to be the most successful locally.
• Alignment of leadership to meet long-term goals.
• Increasing customer demands.
- 30 -
The TelcoSupp’s BSC objectives were designed to support the Vision
Financial / Shareholder• Deliver sustainable
growth in profitability.• Maximise shareholder
value.• Ensure financial
independence by funding future growth and initiatives internally.
Organisational Learning
• Attract and retain appropriate skills.
• Develop a learning culture.
• Communicate effectively.• Apply employment equity
principals.• Empower our employees.• Develop a company team
spirit.• Define, communicate and
live the values.
Internal
• Be the industry benchmark by any measure.
• Invest in the right projects to ensure our future
• Become a centre of competence.
• Develop a balanced relationship with the parent company.
Business PartnersCustomer:• Increase market share.• Broaden customer base.• Improve service quality to
exceed customer expectations.
• Build long term customer partnerships.
Alliances:• Pursue alliances to enable
us in our marketSuppliers:• Build long term supplier
relationshipsCommunity:• Actively support Southern
African development
A measurement system will assess progress towards the objectives.
Vision
- 31 -
Benefits Concerns
Comments on TelcoSupp’s BSC
• Cascaded into the organisation to create focus.
• Parent company has adopted BSC concept and suggested BSC development and implementation for other divisions.
• Strong ‘business partner’ and organisational learning focus.
• High number of objectives (21).
• Accountabilities rest with a few individuals.
Balanced Scorecard Comments
- 32 -
TelcoSupp’s BSC measures and accountabilities
Objectives
Financial
• Deliver sustainable growth in profitability
• Maximise shareholder value.
Agreed Measure(s)• Operative profit on turnover.• ROCE.• EVA.
• Ensure financial independence by funding future growth and initiatives internally.
• Cash flow
Accountability
Financial Director
Financial Director
Financial Director
Business PartnersObjectives
• Market Share Index (aggregate segments)
• Customers’ supplier evaluations.• Customer surveys (includes a preferred supplier assessment.)
• Number of customers contributing >5% of turnover over total customers
• Increase market share.• Broaden customer base.• Improve service quality to exceed customer expectations.• Build long term customer partnerships.
• Pursue strategic alliances to enable us in our market.
• Actively support Southern African development.
• Market share in specific business segments (as measured in the Market Share Index)
• Value of business via Black Economic Empowerment companies.
• IPP credits.
• % purchase volume via frame agreements• Build long term supplier relationships
Agreed MeasureMarketing DirectorMarketing Director
Marketing Director
Marketing Director
Financial Director
Financial Director
Accountability
Cust
omer
sAl
lian-
ces
Supp
-lie
rsCo
mm
-un
iry
- 33 -
TelcoSupp’s BSC measures and accountabilities (cont.)
Internal
• Be the industry benchmark by any measure.
• Become a Centre of Competence.
• Develop a balanced relationship with the parent company.
Objectives
• Refer to Quality Measurement System.
• Number of significant centres of competence.
• Proportion of own business versus commission business
• Invest in the right projects to ensure our future
• Net present value of all project business cases to be implemented
Agreed Measure
Operations Director
CEO
CEO
Executive Accountability
Marketing DirectorOrganisational LearningObjectives
• Staff turnover• Number of unfilled positions
• Training and education expenditure as % of payroll.
• Refer to Quality Measurement System.
• Attract and retain appropriate skills.
• Develop a learning culture.
• Communicate effectively.
• Apply employment equity principals.
• Empower our employees.
• Develop a Siemens team spirit.
• Define, communicate & live the values.
• % Black staff penetration.• % Black and gender representivity.
Agreed Measure
• Refer to Quality Measurement System.
• Refer to Quality Measurement System.
• Refer to Quality Measurement System.
HR Director
HR Director
HR Director
HR Director
HR Director
HR Director
HR Director
Executive Accountability
- 35 -
Client Key Issues
ChemCo needed a strategy to manage a diverse portfolio in a highly cyclical market
• Manufacturer of petrochemicals:– Polymers and monomers for use as industrial feedstocks
– Primarily commodity products
• Approximately 6000 employees
• One year into a two year Business Transformation™ project
• Highly cyclical market.
• Wide variety of product and customer types within the portfolio.
• Major leadership change underway.
- 36 -
Shareholder
Customer
Internal Processes
Society
Employee Learning & Growth
Develop a Learning
Organisation
Focus on Margin
Enhancement
Strive to Continuous Enhancement Manage Value
Adding Process Effectively
Champion Responsible
Care
Foster ProductStewardship
Demonstrate CommunityLeadership
Provide CustomerValue Develop Total
Business Relationships
Build FinancialStrength
Achieve Profitable Growth
Deliver Results to Shareholder
Create a Climate for Results
ChemCo's Balanced Scorecard translated the firm’s strategy into strategic objectives across five perspectives
- 37 -
Benefits Concerns
Comments on ChemCo’s BSC
• Defined linkages to ultimately provide shareholder returns.
• Introduced “society” dimension to indicate community responsibility.
• Reduce focus to thirteen key objectives.
Balanced Scorecard Comments
• Broad and generic objectives and measures:– Not specific to the organisation.– Could apply to other companies.
- 38 -
Employee Learning & Growth Perspective
Society Perspective
Internal Processes Perspective
Shareholder Perspective
Customer Perspective
The objectives were translated into into a set of key strategic measures
•Provide superior value to our customers by supplying them with products and services that meet their needs (total value package).
•Form relationships with customers which allow us to fully understand and address their needs.
C1 Provide Customer Value
C2 Develop Total Business Relationships
SH1 Deliver Results to Shareholders
SH2 Build Financial Strength
SH3 Achieve Profitable Growth
DefinitionStrategic Priority•Develop and use our leadership to empower and gain commitment from all employees thus achieving exceptional business results.
•Improve our skills and knowledge by developing people and adapting best practices found within ChemCo and from external sources to realise all of our priorities.
•Be a leader in our industry by our achievements in safety, health, environment and risk management.
•Qualify as an industry leader by developing mutually supportive relationships with the communities in which we conduct business.
•Integrate health, safety, environment, economic, and ethical considerations at every stage in the life cycle of our products.
•Effectively manage the selection of customers and product offerings (including technology & service) so as to maximise margins.
•Be the low cost provider of products and services by achieving competitive excellence in all our business processes.
•Continuously seek ways to improve and simplify ChemCo’s processes to achieve our strategic business objectives.
•Manage our businesses to achieve the returns expected by shareholders.
•Manage our business so that we are cash positive and able to meet capital funding requirements to sustain ChemCo through the business cycle.
•Achieve increased size in our business to provide increased value to shareholders.
E1 Create a Climate for Results
E2 Develop a Learning Organisation
S1 Champion Responsible Care
S2 Demonstrate Community Leadership
S3 Foster Product Stewardship
I1 Focus on Margin Enhancement
I2 Effectively Manage Value Adding Processes
I3 Strive for Continuous Enhancement
Shareholder
Customer
InternalProcesses
Society
Employee Learningand Growth
Customer satisfaction index
Retention of targeted customers
Measures Leadership effectiveness
� survey rating� communications
Employee satisfaction Best practices identified Employee contribution
Safety,health, environment & risk results.
Community opinion rating Product stewardship
participation
Contribution margin
Cash flow cycle time Cost excellence rating Fixed cost productivity Product development cycle
time Business Transformation/SAP
benefits
Return on capital employed
Economic value added Net cash flow
Total revenue
- 40 -
Client Key Issue
ManCo required a tool to focus and align the organisation
• Large petrochemical manufacturer.
• BSC was a component of a large two year transformation™ project.
• Significant cost reduction required to maintain profitability.
• Need to focus and align the organisation.
- 41 -
Accountability and targets are seen as key components of ManCo’s BSC
Shareholder / Financial Customer
Growth / Learning Internal Processes
KPI (Area) A Target CommentsReturn on Net Assets
PBIT/ Net assets (Qtr)
Profit after tax
Cash flow 4 -12 months projection (Mth)
Unit cost
KPI (Area) A Target CommentsCustomer satisfaction index
% Conformance to agreed offering per customer.(Qtr)
Product Mix Optimisation
KPI (Area) A Target CommentsValue created by Project Portfolio
NPV ofnew and developing projects at 22% discount rate (WACC) vs target NPV (Qtr)
Core competencies Taken off
until a suitable measure is defined
KPI (Area) A Target CommentsProcess efficiency
Environment Index: releases, resource consumptions, re-mediation & compliance (Mth)
Safety and Health
Production Value (Mth)
DIIR including occupational diseases
Total Cost per ton of product (Mth)
% Adherence to Target Mix (Mth)
Ton marketable product per gigajoule (Mth)
Actual vs target (Mth)
PeopleKPI (Area) A Target Comments
Employee satisfaction / climate windowAffirmative Action
Index : Leadership values,Job satisfaction and Development Productivity (Qtr)AA spectrum % (Qtr)
Production
Technical Integrity
Index: to be defined
Note: Accountabilities and targets not shown to maintain client confidentiality.
- 42 -
Benefits Concerns
Comments on ManCo’s BSC
• Significant management buy-in and use of the BSC.
• Two years after introduction the BSC remain the key focus/management tool for the executive committee.
• ‘People’ dimension added to indicate a key focus area.
• BSC focused on measures not objectives.
• After two years, executives consider fifteen objectives/measures too many to focus on simultaneously.
Balanced Scorecard Comments
- 44 -
Client Key Issue
OilCo need to address internal soft issues
• Significant player in the downstream oil business.
• Successful organisation looking to maintain and grow position.
• Low employee moral and lack of confidence in leadership.
• Lack of understanding of organisations vision and strategy.
• Growth in market place.
- 45 -
Vision
BSC of a large downstream Oil CompanyFinancial / Shareholder Objectives
Customers and Partners Objectives Internal Processes Objectives
Learning and Innovation Objectives
• Maximise shareholder value.
• Real growth in operating profit with a long term objective of 10%.
• Keep unit cost increase below inflation.
• Increase Market Share
• Add significant value to customers.
• Ensure clear roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for all our people.
• Mobilise the organisation towards the vision.
• Ensure strategic advantage through IT.
• Ensure effective performance management.
• Increase diversity in the workforce.
• Empower our employees.
• Stimulate creativity and innovate.
- 46 -
Benefits Concerns
Comments on OilCo’s BSC
• Half the objectives focus on soft issues, to address current internal issues.
• Reduced number of objectives to allow for greater focus.
• No objective to determine/focus on internal efficiencies.
Balanced Scorecard Comments
- 47 -
OilCo designs measures and assigned accountability for all their objectives
Learning and InnovationObjective Measures Accountable
Person• Ensure effective
performance management1) Employees with development plans (lead)2) Level of acceptance of merit appraisal system
(lag)3) Percentage of employees receiving
quarterly performance reviews (lead)
4) Level of belief that performance drives reward and recognition (lag)
HR Director
• Increase diversity in the workforce
1) Staff mix (lag)2) Diversity awareness / attitude (lag)
CEO
• Empower our employees 1) Employee belief that they are empowered (lag) Operations Director
• Stimulate creativity and innovate
1) Number of new ideas (lag)2) Financial impact of new value - adding ideas
(lag)Technology Director
• Increase market share. 1) Market share (lag) Strategy director
• Add significant value to customers
1) Number of value adding plans for top 20% of customers (lead)
2) Customer belief that OilCo adds value to them (lag)
Marketing director
Customers and PartnersObjective Measures Accountable
Person
- 48 -
OilCo designs measures and assigned accountability for all their objectives
Internal Processes
• Ensure clear roles, responsibilities and accountabilities for all our people
1) Percentage of employees with agreed performance charters (lead)
2) Degree to which employees believe that their roles, responsibilities and accountabilitiesare clearly defined (lag)
Operations director
• Mobilise the organisation towards the vision
1) Percentage of employees who attended a Vision / Mission roll-out session (lead)
2) Percentage of monthly business meetings where Vision / Mission is a fixed agenda item and is discussed (lead)
3) Employee belief that OilCo is adhering to its stated value system (lag)
4) Percentage of employees responding “Yes” to vision / mission understanding and acceptance (lag)
HR director
• Ensure strategic advantage through IT
1) Return on total cost of ownership as an investment indicator (lag)
IT director
Objective Measures Accountable Person
Financial / ShareholderObjective Measures Accountable Person
• Maximise shareholder value 1) E.V.A. CEO
• Real growth in operating profit with a long term objective of 10%
CEO
• Keep unit cost increase below inflation
1) Increase in unit cost / vs. CPI. CFO
1) Real annual growth in operating profit
- 50 -
Client Key Issue
Aluminium Smelter introduced a BSC concept to monitor the progress of their “STAR” project
• International Aluminium Smelter.
• BSC development was part of an improvement project.
• Need to demonstrate financial performance to attract further investment:– Investment required for incremental expansion.
– No investment would force the Smelter to close in eight years’ time.
- 51 -
The management team BSC is displayed in a dashboard format
Performance ofRetrofitted
potsNet
shareholder value
PerformanceagainstSTAR
deliverables
Potlineinternalenv’t
Product/processdev’t
Profit
Rate of
return
Unit cost(addedvalues)
Accidentrate
Currentefficiency
• External environmental index.
• Environmental permit exceedances.
• Sickness rate.
• Potline output.
• Saleable output.
- 52 -
Benefits Concerns
Comments on Aluminium Smelters BSC
• The dashboard format indicates importance of each measure:– Large indicators represent key measures.
– Small indicators represent secondary measures.
– Bullet points indicate “warning lights”. Notice only when warning light flashes.
• Focus on few key themes.• Significant detail was
developed for each theme.
• Lack of balance in the scorecard:– Little focus on ‘customers’ and ‘innovation and learning’.
– Little need for customer focus as most product sold to shareholder.
– Focus on financial measures, as these are key for long term survival.
Balanced Scorecard Comments
- 54 -
The BSC must be driven from the top
• Leadership/management long-term buy-in and commitment to the Balanced Scorecard process is critical to ensuring success.
• The scorecard needs to be a living document:– Modified/reviewed in line with business/environmental changes.– Scorecard modification/review in conjunction with a strategic review process.
• Agree on a final limited set of key objectives:– Too many objectives will ‘de-focus’ the organisation and spread resources too thinly.
– Differentiate between nice-to-have and must have objectives.
• Measures must be carefully selected to reflect/determine the objective’s core intent.
• Do not develop a system with high running/maintenance costs, i.e. measurement cost outweighs benefit:– Use the 80:20 principle.
- 55 -
The final BSC must focus on the few key objectives required to achieve the strategy
• Too many objectives:– Confuse & de-focus the organisation.– Spread energy to thinly.
• Ensure a balance of objectives between the four dimensions .
• Clear accountabilities must be assigned for each objective.
• Assign only key measures for each objective:– As few measures per objective, ideally only one.– Distinguish between critical and nice-to-have measures.– Ensure balance between lead and lag indicators.
• Ensure the objective for the high level scorecard are strategic in nature, and crucials for all departments.– Operational or department specific objectives must be moved to departmental scorecards.
- 56 -
Successful BSC development will depend in placing objectives and measures at the correct level in the BSC structure
Most of Hillside’s present KPA are departmental measures.
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Financial
Customers& Partners
InternalProcessesVision
Learning& Innovation
Departmental Scorecards
High level or organisation scorecard:
- 57 -
Two factors drive the need for objectives in the high level BSC
Factors driving need for objectives in the high level scorecard
Potential objectives can be assessed against these two dimensions.
Together they determine
requirements for the
objectives in the high level
scorecard.
The need for strategic integration
The need for operational integration
- 58 -
The high level scorecard must focus on strategic issues which integrate across several departments
High
LowHigh
Objectives fordepartmentalscorecardsTh
e ne
eds f
or s
trat
egic
inte
grat
ion
The needs for operational integration
Objectives for
the high level
scorecard
- 59 -
There are many potential pitfalls to successful implementation
Scorecard Design Scorecard Implementation / Roll-out
Strategic Intent
Develop & finalise Objectives
Develop & finalise Measures
Determine baselines and set targets
Incorporate scorecard review as
key item in business management meetings
Manage business according
to scorecard
Review/refine
score-card on a
regular basis
in conjunc-tion with strategy review process
Align/plan initiatives according
to scorecard
Communicate Scorecard to organisation
Develop and
implement BU and section
scorecards
Ensure scorecard alignment
Review & refine onan ongoing
basis
Manage BU, section etc.
according to
scorecard format
Cascade scorecard to individual level. To ensure individual
focus and alignment.
Feedback to high level scorecard to ensure alignment
Corporate/Shareholder input where relevant
Inappropriate strategy
Measures not aligned to objectives
Targets too soft
or ambitious
Scorecard not used
as business
management/focus toolScorecard
not communicated
Review process
inadequate or poorly
timed
Poor alignment between levelsFeedback
not taken into
account
- 60 -
PhilosophyProcess
Strategic Intent
Poor BSC design and implementation can lead to a multitude of problems
• Industry generic, not strategic.• Perspectives “unintegrated”.• What customer values not
defined.• Missing internal, operational
link.• Levels in organisation not
distinguished.
Measurement
• Too many measures.• Unrealistic, unrepeatable.
• Activities instead of measures.
• Misleading.• All financial.
• No executive consensus - not top down.
• Roll out before completion.• Tie to incentives too quickly.• Too many people, too long.• Lose momentum.
• Control, not communication.• Strategic report vs. strategic
agenda.• Strategic planning vs.
improvisation.