agenda meeting - St. Tammany Parish Government

AGENDA MEETINGST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING

OCTOBER 5, 2021 - 2PMST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT COMPLEX BUILDING A

21490 KOOP DRIVE, PARISH COUNCIL CHAMBERSMANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA

NOTE: This meeting wifi be open to the public. Seating may be restricted due to COVID19capacity guidelines. Attendees wifi be required to wear a face mask or covering.

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

ANNOUNCEMENTS• Please silence all phones and electronic devices• Appeals• Speaker Cards• Public Speaking - Ten (10) minutes each side and five (5) minutes for rebuttal• Please exit the building

APPROVAL OF THE JULY 6, 2021 MINUTESPUBLIC HEARINGS

1- BOA CASE NO.2021-2480-BOARequest by applicant in an A-2 Suburban Zoning District for an after the fact variance toreduce the required rear yard setback from 19.3 feet to 11.3 feet to allow for the completionof the construction of a single family residence.The property is located:3 14 Fountain Street, Mandeville, LouisianaApplicant: Cassandra LuquetRepresentative: Ricky Landry

2- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2504-BOARequest by applicant in a HC-2 Highway Commercial Zoning District for:

• A waiver of the required 5 foot setback.• A variance to increase the maximum allowable height of the sign from 9 feet to 13.4 feet.• An increase in the maximum allowable square footage of a monument sign from 32 square

feet to 50 square feet.The property is located: 2009 Ronald Regan Hwy, Covington, LouisianaOwner: Thomas MincherApplicant: American Hunter — Ronnie AlphaRepresentative: Vincent F. Wynne, Jr.

3- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2509-BOARequest by applicant in an A-4 Single Family Residential Zoning District to reduce the requiredfront setback from 25 feet to 18 feet and the required rear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet.The property is located: 62230 N. 14th Street, Slidell, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: Ashley Cannon

4- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2510-BOARequest by applicant in a HC-2 Highway Commercial Zoning District to reduce the required sidelandscape buffer on the north side of the property from 10 feet to 3.6 feet for approximately 181feet and to replace the required number of Class A & Class B trees.The property is located: 70487 Highway 21, Covington, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: PPCW, LLC — Ronnie Bonner & Todd Heiden

5- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2512-BOARequest by applicant in an A-i Suburban Zoning District to:

• Reduce the required 50 foot no cut buffer to 10 feet on the east side of the property, for adistance of approximately 50 feet from LA Tung Road, to allow for the placement of adriveway.

• Reduce the required 50 foot no cut buffer along the natural drainage crossing the property.The property is located: 18001 LA Tung Road, Covington, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: Roxanne Lepre

6- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2515-BOARequest by applicant in a CBF-1 Community Based Facilities Zoning District for a waiver of therequired 8 foot opaque fence on the north and east sides of the property where abutting A-2Suburban Zoning District.The property is located at 24401 Highway 190, Lacombe, Louisiana.Applicant: Chad Almquist

7- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2529-BOARequest by applicant in an A-2 Suburban Zoning District for a waiver of the required 50 foot nocut buffer on the east side of the property.The property is located on the north side of Perrilloux Road, Madisonville, Louisiana.Applicant & Representative: William P. Holliday

8- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2533-BOARequest by applicant in a PBC-i Public Business Campus Zoning District for an after the factrequest to replace the required trees to be preserved within the street planting buffer area and withina 154 foot portion of the south side buffer planting area, with the required number of Class A &Class B trees.The property is located at 64231 Highway 434, Lacombe, Louisiana.Applicant: Phiski LLC — John MalinskiRepresentative: C M Combs Construction, LLC — Christopher Combs

9- BOA CASE NO. 2021-2554-BOARequest by applicant in an A-5 Two-Family Residential Zoning District for a reduction of therequired minimum width for a two-way driveway from 24 feet to 16 feet.The property is located at 72194 Formosa Drive, Covington, Louisiana.Applicant & Representative: Steve Blanc

OLD BUSINESS

NEW BUSINESS

ADJOURNMENT

MINUTESST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF AI)JUSTMENT MEETING AUGUST 4, 2021

ST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT COMPLEX BUILI)ING “A”21490 KOOP DRIVE, PARISH COUNCIL CHAMBERS

MANI)EVILLE, LOUISIANA

I he August 4, 2021 meeting of the St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment was called to orderby the Vice Chairman, Mr. Ballantine.

The roll was called as Ihilows:

PRLSLN’T: Mr. Brookter, Mrs. Thomas. Mr. Ballantine, Mr. Daly, Mr. Blache (present as votingmember), Mr. Spies.

ABSEN’J’: N A

SI AF1~ PRESENT: Mr. Liner. Mrs. Lambert. Mrs. Couvillon, Ms. Contois

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTESMoved by Mr. l3rookter and seconded by Mrs. Thomas to accept the July 6, 2021 minutes.

MOTION (ARRIES L NANIMOUSLY

I- BOA CASE NO.2021- 2431-BOARequest by applicant in a Pt D Planned Unit Development Overlay to reduce the requiredstreet planting area from 35 feet to 4 lèetThe property is located: 510 East l-lowze Beach Road, Slidell, LouisianaApplicant: Group I Realty, Inc. Honda of SlidellRepresentative: Birkie Ayer, Jr.

(Mrs. Lambert read the staff report into the record...)

.lohn .Jacohson: Committed to remodel the I londa dealership and to make it look better thancurrently. Given the same criteria for design. I ive oak trees are to he replanted in kind. Would likethe Board to approve as requested.

Birkie Ayer. Jr.: F~ xplains request from previous month. Obviously previous request was notsufficient. Meet with staff. Revised plan submitted Entire row of parking spaces removed. Pushedfrom 4 foot buffer to 20 foot buffer. Provides details regarding proposed buffer. Refers to reviseddrawing submitted. [‘he 2 existing live oak trees are located outside of the 35 foot buffer and in aterrible place to allow to expand the facility. Proposing eight 4 inches live oak trees. total of 32inches, to replace the two 16 inches live oak trees and preserving live oak tree in other buffer andother existing trees. Providing same amount of’ planting. Also improving landscaping on sides andreai (pro~’ides list of species and number of trees to oc planted). Dramatic improvement to the frontof’ the facility and it will also ilTiprOve the circulation and car display. Show the Board someArchitectural renderings. Meet the required 35 foot buffer on the sides, not in the front.

Mr. Ballantine: Ask Ms. Contois to provide comments on proposed revised plan.

Ms. Contois: Did not reviewed the revised plan submitted at the meeting after the staff report wascorn p1 eted.

Birkie Ayer. Jr.: Revised plan submitted before staff report completed. New revised plan submittedis different and was submitted after staff report was completed. Made attempt to meet the minimumrequired number of Class A & Class B trees. Would like to keep working with staff to make surerequired species and number o~trees a~e provided. Only variance requested is the reduction of thefront buffer.

Ms. (ontois: Question: Is the proposed mitigation for the live oak trees in addition to the standardplanting requirements?

Birkie Ayer, Jr.: Some of the live oak trees are proposed to be planted in buffers and some are not.All mitigation tree are proposed to he planted from the building to the street. The 8 live oak treesare proposed to be planted from the building forward. The 32 inches of live oak trees proposed tohe planted are not in addition to the minimum standard planting but part of the required planting.

Ms. Contois: Asking the question because the code requires that the mitigation of live oak trees bein addition to the required minimum number of Class A & Class B trees. It should he clarified aspart of variance request. No trees proposed to be provided in parking islands. Is it part of the~ariance request?

l3irkic A~er. .Jr.: It was indicated in the staff report. In regards to the parking islands located nextto the shov~room, not proposing to provide trees hut could provide if requested.

Mr. Ballantine: To clarify the request. you are requesting to reduce the front buffer from 35 feetto 20 feet? This is what we would be voting on?

Birkie Ayer, Jr.: Correct.

Mrs. Lambert: The Hoard also need to vote on the request to provide or not provide the requirednumber of trees within the parking row and on the request to use the replanted Live Oak trees tomeet the required number of 1 5 Class A & 1 5 Class B within the front landscaping buffer.

Mr. Blache: Suggest amendment to the original motion to include the request to provide requirenumber ol’trees within parking islands and to use the replanted Live Oak trees to meet the requirednumber of 1 5 Class A & 1 5 Class B within the front landscaping buffer.

Moved by Mr. Brookter and seconded by Mrs. Thomas to approved the requested variance toreduce the front planting buffer to 20, the proposed revised plan and to add required trees in theparking island.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY

2- BOA CASE NO.2021-2459-BOARequest by applicant in an A-3 Suburban Zoning District & MHO Manufactured HousingOverlay to reduce the required rear yard setback from 25 feet to 15 feet to allow for theplacement of a manufactured home on the property.The property is located: 59230 N Preachers Oak Lane, Slidell, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: Dwayne Parker

(Mrs. Lambert read the stall report into the record...)

Mrs. Lambcrt: Request may ha~e to he amended since the drawing shows manufactured homewith tongue.

I)waync Parker: Explained that he submitted survey and plot plan showing manufactured home.Not aware of the required setbacks. I was informed after applying for permit that I had to adjustthe setbacks. Manufactured home moved Ofl the property before electrical permit was applied for.

Mrs. Lambert: Are you aware that you have to remove the tongue? And how far is the mobilehome Irom the property lines?

1)waync Parker: 1 ongue has been removed as well as the axle. Do not know where the propertyline s in the front in regards to the ditch. In the rear. the mobile home is 17 feet from the fence,but property line is further back. Provides additional information regarding the property.

Mr. I3rookter: What is the sue of your property?

Dwayne Parker: 50 feet X 120 ft~et.

Moved by Mrs. Thomas and seconded by Mr. I3rookter to approved as requested.


3- BOA CASE NO.2021-2470-BOARequest h~ applicant in an A-2 Suburban toning I)istrict for a waiver of the requiredsetback on the north and west sides and to reduce the required setback from 25 feet to 2.75ft~et on the east side olan existing pond.I’he property is located: 1835 Lotus Road, Mandeville, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: C.I~. Properties of Louisiana - Joshua Fouquet


Joshua Fouquet: Requesting variances as shown on the survey. Could make lots smaller. Tryingto make lots look symmetrical similar in size. Ii is currently 4 parcels and requesting to create atotal of 5 lots. Existing ponds has been in place for many years and goes over 2 of the lots.

Mr. Blache: Ask to confirm concern from staff in regards to the maintenance of the pond.

Mrs. Lambert: Pond will he crossing several property lines, which could cause some issues inregards to the maintenance and the use of the pond and also the need to involve several propertyowners. Potential issues v~ ith trespassing over common property line

Mr. l3lache: I-low can you address concern from staff?

Joshua Fouquet: Will ask attorney to draft agreement and submit to Parish. Property owner wouldhave to agree to common maintenance agreement of the pond.

Mr. Brookter: Are different flood zone shown on the survey and crossing the property lines?

Joshua Fouquet: Flood Zone B near the pond, Lots, 1. 2,4 & 5 and existing house within Floodtone C. Large area wooded in the rear and rest is all green. Almost 550 feet to build house outsideof Flood zone. Lot I is reduced from approximately 900 feet to 567 feet. Reconfiguring the lots.

Mr. l)aly: Lots 3, 4 & 5 arc extending over the pond. Could you reconfigure the lots to be shorterand have the pond only on lot 2?

Joshua Fouquct. I he lots would not meet the minimum lot si/c of I acre.

Mr. Daly: Ask for clarification of required no cut buffers.

Mrs. Lambert: 25 feet no cut bdffer along the lron~ ~~nd 50 feet no cut buffers on the sides and rear.

Mr. 1)aly: Only 50 feet left to build a house. It appears to he like some cases presented to the Boardwhere only a small area is lef~ to build a residence.

Motion by Mr. Blache and seconded by Mrs. Thomas to approve as requested with stipulation thatmaintenance agreement of the pond be submitted.


4- BOA CASE NO.2021-2474-130ARequest by applicant in a I IC-3 Highway Commercial Zoning District to reduce therequired street planting buffer from 30 feet to 10 feet.Ihe property is located: Southeast corner of LA I lighway 59 & 1-12, Mandeville, LouisianaApplicant: lhrce W. & Mandeville, LLCRepresentative: Gull States Real Estate Services. LLC Michael J. Saucier


Michael Saucier: Present project for new Micro Hospital Speciali7ed Emergency room. Existingbuffer along 1-12 within the Right of Way. On site Detentionldry pond, allowing to replant treesrequired by code. Propose use is a low traffic generator. Approximately 20 patients per day. Crossaccess agreement with gas station.

Mr. Daly: Is an access going to be provided from gas station to the emergency room?

Mr. Saucier: Correct. Emergency entry from the gas station and other access for public from theadjacent road.

Motion by Mrs. Thomas and seconded by Mr. I)aly to approved as requested and as per staffcomments.

5- I3OA CASE NO.2021-2475-BOARequest by applicant in an A-2 Suburban /oning District to increase the maximumallowable length of an accessory structure from 50 feet to 60 feet and the maximumallowable width of an accessory structure from 50 feet to 55 feet.

1 he property is located: 1 29 Oak Manor I)rive, Slidell, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: James R. Watts

(Mrs. I ambert read the staff report into the record...)

James R. Watts: Not aware of size restriction. Need to cover camper and boat. I~nclosed area is 40feet X 60 feet with an attached lean to. No objection letters from President of 1-lomeownerAssociation and abutting neighbors submitted the Hoard at the meeting.

Motion by Mr. l3rooktcr and seconded by Mrs. 1 hornas to approve as requested.

6- BOA CASE NO.2021-2477-BOARequest by applicant in an A-3 Suburban ioning District for an after the fact waiver of therequired 50 loot no cut buffer from the top of the bank of Cypress Bayou.The property is located: 60343 Park Drive, Lacombe, LouisianaApplicant & Representative: Michel Burgess & Andrew Pei’fley

(Mrs. I ambert read the staff report into the record...)

Andrew Peffley: Contractor for the project. Property in family for 80 years. There was acommunity pool on the properly in the 50~s. It was abandoned and property overgrown. Client isinterested to build a house. Pool and property brought up to safer standards. Cleared existing path.Found out about no cut buffer. If allowed to use existing driveway, will avoid having to removeadditional trees and keep the property secluded.

Mr. Blache: Request seems to be the less obtrusive option. In favor of request.

Mr. f3allantine: Ills not reall) an after the fact request, since it was not a clear cutting. Visited thesite and could observe that most of the trees have been presenied.

Motion b) Mr. Blache and SeCC)nded by Mr. I)aly to approve as requested.

7- BOA CASE NO.202 1- 2480-BOA-- POSTPONED FROM 06/01/2021 MEETINGRequest by applicant in an A-2 Suburban /oning District for an after the fact variance toreduce the required rear yard setback from 19.2 ft~ct to 4 ft~et to allow for the completionof the construction ola single larnily residence.ihe property is located:314 Fountain Street, Mandeville. LouisianaApplicant: Cassandra LuquetRepresentative: Ricky Landry

Mrs. Lambert indicated that the case had to he readvertised.

Moved by Mr. I3rookter and seconded by Mrs. I homas to postpone until the September ~ 2021Meeting.

V1OTION CARRIES I NkN~MOU~LY

OLD BUSINESS

NEW BUSINESS

AI)JOURNMENT: Mr. Ballantine. VICE CI-IAIRMAN

MOTION CARRIEI) UNANIMOUSLY

MR 10 VI BALLAN I INE. VICE-( I IAIRMANS 1. 1 AMMANY PARISI I I3OARI) OF AI)JI. STMENTS

Disclaimer: These minutes are intended to represent an overview of the meeting and genera!representation of the testimony given; and therefore, does not constitute verbatim testimony ora transcription of the proceedings.

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 2021-2480-BOAInitial Hearing Date: 10 05 2021 (postponed from 09 07 2021 due to Hurricane Ida)Date of Report: 09 24 2021

GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant: Cassandra LuquetRepresentative: Ricky LandryLocation of Property: 314 Fountain Street, Mandeville, LouisianaZoning of Property: A-2 Suburban Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Reduction of the rear yard setback.

OVERVIEWRequest by applicant for an after the fact variance to reduce the required rear yard setback from19.2 feet to 11.3 feet.

STAFF COMMENTS

The after the fact request is to allow for the completion of the construction of a single familyresidence. After issuance of the building permit and further review of the site plan, it was broughtto our attention that a portion of the rear porch and stair case was constructed within the rear yardsetback (see attached). Note that only a portion of the porch being 19.4 feet in width will encroachwithin the rear yard setback.

4

g:~3

~Ti1

~~~~~1

Roxi and Cassie LuquetParcel in lot 39, Fountain Ave.St. Tammany Parish, La.

SetbacksFront 2.5’Right Side 7.5’

~ Left SideRear 19.25’

.

.Ie

Date7123/20

PROJECT NO:6709

7-06-2021MEMOTO: St. Tammany Parish Board of AdjustmentFROM: Brett FaltermanRE: Opposition to Variance Request. BOA Case # 2021-2389-BOA

Dear St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustors,

I previously wrote the BOA expressing opposition to the variance request referenced above.The applicants of this variance request failed to appear at the first hearing, and I am unable totake off another day of work. The Intent of this letter is to remind the BOA of the unitedopposition of the adjacent landowners to this variance request, and to explain why.

Duringthe previous BOA hearings I attended, the BOA clearly views documentation ofthardship’ as an important factor in approving or denying variance requests. In this case, thegreater hardship falls on adjacent landowners, who are experienced significant and unmitigatedflooding due to construction activity at 314 Fountain St.

I also understood from the previous hearing that part of the justification for the variancerequested in this case was due to a small mistake during parish permitting relevant to the rearset-back (discrepancy of 19.4’ versus 19.2’). I do not object to the granting of a minor variancefor this mistake. I do object to the substantial variance being requested of 15’, which wouldallow construction activity to within 4’ of the rear property line (the structure has a 5’overhang).

I also understand from the previous hearing that this request is ‘retro-active,’ meaning to methat the out-of-town contractor conducted unpermitted work and is now asking the BOA tocover it up. I politely request that the BOA uphold relevant St. Tammany Parish building code,deny variance requests that are due to poor planning or basic disregard for existing ParishCode, and minimize the spatial extent of variance requests that are deemed legitamate andnecessary.

Thanks,

Brett Falterman237 OAK IN MANDEVIILE LA 70448

Scanned with CamScanner

28July 2021

Memorandum to St. Tammany BOA (Reference 314 Fountain Street Mandeville,LA)

To whom it may concern,

I strongly oppose the approval of this variance request for 314 Fountain Street Mandeville, LA 70448.20% of the depth for this property is approximately 19.2 feet. This build was originally approved insideof the required setback (“due to an error by a new person in the office” per phone conversation on 20May 2021), and from what I understand further variance inside of 4 feet is now being requested. The‘nita error is inexcusable. After the incorrect initial approval, there were mu tip e inspections of theproperty. Inspectors U d not notice the proximity of the piles and building to the property line. This isdue to lack of attention to deLil’, lazness, or negligence. In any case, this should have been caughtearlier in the process. Due to ~he m ~rnper approval, the contractor drove piles dangerously close tothe neighboring properties. Damage occr~rred in multiple locations on a shared brick wall.

If the house is allowed to remain in its current position, the surrounding property values in thishistorical neighborhood will drop as a direct result of this gross error. The construction at 314Fountain has flooded the neighboring properties. The roof covers a very large portion of the property,and it is closer to the surrounding properties than what is allowed by code. The house footprint anddrainage does not meet code; the water no longer flows in the preconstruction drainage direction. Thegrade of the property traps water to the rear and side of the house, and it floods the neighboringproperties. The proximity and lack of drainage causes undue hardship on the neighboring properties.

St. Tammany Parish should honor the required setback as stated by code (25 feet or 20% of propertydepth). Drainage of this property needs to be readdressed and fixed immediately. I ask the board toconsider what they would do if a neighbor’s house was causing flooding on their property along withbeing so close to your property that someone could look out of multiple windows straight into yourbedroom. I implore the board to do the right thing and disapprove this variance request and ensurethe proper setback is honored. In addition to the proper setback, drainage needs to be engineered tofollow the historical .ii ction (East) towards the street.

The contractor has not been a~ the p ‘~vious two BOA meetings. It seems that he is not taking thisseriously, or he just expects the varianL... ~o be approved because the structure is already out of code.It doesn’t matter if the porch s 2 feet or 20 feet wide. It is part of the structure of the home, and itneeds to be modified to fit outside of the required setback (19.2’). Why even have setbackrequirements if this variance is approved? This error is detrimental to the value of the surroundingproperties, and it causes undue hardship by flooding areas of surrounding properties that were notflooding until this construction began. If the required 20% setback is not honored and the drainage isnot fixed, the parish could face multiple lawsuits. Thank you for your time and consideration in thismatter.

Respectfully,

Bret Deroche

245 Oak Ln Mande~lle, LA

-— .,~ A-

~ —, ..S I - r

~ •~_~ ~

-~ --

;.;•• LI- -

— —4 -~

—

-~ _5~i •~,

--~

- - ~ ~jjiw~ F

0 .4. il” i

:.~.t -J~bffi~ r

~ .nIc ~

--

nfl1

• ‘- ~?“4G~~~ -

-

~1~~

- ft

~ ~%.:7

~ W’~ Jet

~ ~

•.L -,

-‘. t~k - .k~ ~

‘~ ~fl P

—I • —

—4-i

-4

4

-4.

:~

~ø:~i~ ~ F

•‘ W,~ - -

_:“

Vt

I-

- It

•‘.4s ‘:tL.

~ •~-: ----~; ‘c~r%

• ,- •

tr. t~

- .11~

~Y~i-T

‘4’ ~-

a—

,

S S-~ -I_I

-4

LV-

I——

i44~Lt ‘ht

.;.t r:.•

‘~

ii

-~W~ j:—

‘~ ~ 4,

-. .,;~

I

rI—

q P

A

-q - . t~rr .-, L— — r ~ .__~ — I ~ —— C .~‘ a. — r — — —ii

-~ ~&~->~ .~: . ‘);-~‘,-.aV.. -— • 4” - . •. -—- ..-.

—‘• A- -I- ~ Jq 11’W IF’ ~ t3

— 0 /~t~k. ~ r~ S ,~~ : C St. -. . ~ ~ - •~.• . . -—We

-~ -. .C4! L.?d .1 ~ ~ ,. —

b,, ~%cn~, ~cr -; - ~ -s-i : ~4t.::~~* — -

- . ~. .. . - r-_,~ 1r~ -

~r-fl--4 Lr~htr ~ -

- ‘~:‘—-~-- --~—•..~-- - — - _~~___

~4. .

~ -~

-~ a

:11I

4-- 3

~ .sc-~~ .~:;:~ ~-~: t~. :~ s~ I~-

— -,~ ....~ 1~

S

1’

p.

I ~

j4;~gIi

a ~, -.,

“-i-

-r

q.

II fr 4

J.

4t~t.



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant: American Hunter — Ronnie AlphaOwner: Thomas MincherRepresentative: Vincent F. Wynne, JrLocation of Property: 2009 Ronald Regan Hwy, Covington, LouisianaZoning of Property: HC-2 Highway Commercial Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: After the fact variance requests to increase the maximum

allowable height and square footage of a signOVERVIEW

The requests consist of:• A variance to increase the maximum allowable height of the sign from 9 feet to 13.4 feet.• A variance to increase in the maximum allowable square footage of a monument sign from

32 square feet to 50 square feet.

STAFF COMMENTSStaff is not opposed to the request to increase the height of the sign due to the unusual elevationdifference between Highway 190 and the proposed location of the sign. The difference in elevationcreates a hardship in regards to the visibility of the sign.

The requested variance to increase of the maximum allowable square footage of the singleoccupancy sign from 32 square feet to 50 square feet is a personal preference rather than a propertyhardship.

190

‘

ERICAN UNTER, L.L.C.2009 RONALD REAGAN HWY

COVNIGTON, LOUISIANA 70433

To Whom It May Concern:

Please consider this a formal request for a variance by my business, American Hunter, to a owthe business to keep in place a new sign placed on the original sign structure.

The sign has been in place for over 40 years and was put in its current location because the lotand building are situated much lower that the highway. The highway curves at the entrance tothe place of business and the lot and building are at least 8 feet lower than the road itself. Thecurvature of the highway and the recessed nature of the lot and building required the sign to bebuilt in its current configuration.

I was told by the sign company, who changed my logo, that I could take the sign down one sideat a time and replace the sign with a new logo. I am now aware that this was not appropriate andwould have applied for the correct permit had I known of the requirements for a non-conformingsign.

I am concerned that a monument sign will not allow customers to find my place of business andwould respectfully request that my company be given a variance to allow the sign to remain in itscurrent location and configuration.

Si~ely,

Ronnie Alpha

Thomas Mincher

580 Highway 1085

Madisonville, Louisiana 70447

July 15, 2021

Via U.S. Mail and E-Mail hlambert(ã~stpgov.org

Ms. Helen LambertAssistant ] )irectorDepartmei it of Planning & DevelopmentSt. Tammany Parish GovernmentP.O. Box b28Covington, LA 70434

RE: 2009 Ronald Reagan Highway, Covington, Louisiana 70435

Dear Sir/Madam:

1, [‘homas Mincher, owner of the property located at 2009 Ronald Reagan Highway,Covingtor, Louisiana, do hereby appoint and permit Ronnie Alpha, leasee of the above-mentioned property, and his lawyer, Vincent F. Wynne, Jr., to represent my interest in therequest fo a variance before the Board of Adjustments. Further, I authorize them to take anysteps nece ;sary to obtain a variance for the sign that I placed on the property.

Si re

/

Mi. Vincent F. Wynne, Jr.

U

t

t

0

~te,

‘Sn

wry

*z0

-çK

/ I,.-S1~

CD

CD

a

I

‘1

.1

S

%.1

If)

Iti(P1

I—

‘S

.5

I.

-¼~!

MIll

I

‘N

0 it

/

CD

GeCGO

~

* ~

~ ‘3 -

~ L.

~, ~i ~

C rji

j

ci

(T~ ~

~cI~i~2

~

------

*-~

~

n~ ~P~2\~Q~J ~

J V~Y?~ ~\ATh~2)

\~‘~

c~Gd

/1 ~

~\4I

~Ec Q

C

©

a-

9’ C.)

~j: zN)~J1

- _I

‘4.

.

~T.-.

- ~

~ -~-2J-~ ~•

- —--‘- ~- ~4- .•~ - - :~-~-L\’~.~- -

-

.?~- .

- ~ -~

~.,.I ~-

I.

J~

L .~. - -

~‘7.

41-r

4. -~

-~

,~.•: ~-‘~-

~: •1~~ . -~ ~‘1i~2 ~ ~

• -~••)~.

• • ~

• • •

• • •

.•~. ...~,

• ~ •~• ..., ‘.1~-

,~•;~; !

; 7

~: j,.”~ .~• .~ •

-.

~..~-. ~

~; .~?•;/~,

•,~ ~. ‘~

0•~

~..•.•.-. •••~••~~“

i~:~ ~ ~

~ ~t:•.••

IC

americanhunterusa.com0

,.. 0.

~ ~‘••~

• ~r ~ It

~ ~: • • •~.. •• .~

•t~I

. ~ • • ••~ ••

~ -:~~ T

1 .• • I •

• - • .- •rM. •~& •,

• •• •~JL

• s -7 “

‘2 —i

S.’

4- — ~•

ti •t~ F

44

4

r ‘~“~ •‘-

—; .-t’.-:~-’~-;. a.

-~ • •‘ -‘ ••?•3 ~

•1’ ‘t~ i.L-~Jc- , ~ 4.

~ 1; —‘ —

-‘:‘ -— :- •:~- ‘In..- --~

• /. • • . c~~’ ‘-~~ ~ ;-. I—.

I :._ _ ••I —\•• I,’- •J~~• •. . •-

r- -4

• . • • ~ iS

4-a -J,:.,~•‘- ::~~ 2

1, --

•~~: —~-“-‘~-

• • •~: 1• JfrY•~fr

• ‘ -- ‘I-. -~•~ ~tG~

- i-•~

•, 5-

-5--. - -.

•~‘ :‘—~~\



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant & Representative: Ashley CannonLocation of Property: 62230 N. 14th Street, Slidell, LouisianaZoning of Property: A-4 Single Family Residential Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Reduction of the front and rear yard setbacks.

OVERVIEWRequest by applicant to reduce the required front setback from 25 feet to 18 feet and the requiredrear setback from 20 feet to 10 feet.

STAFF COMMENTS

The objective of the request is to allow for the placement of a 1,152 square foot (16’ X 72’)manufactured home on a 50’ X 100’ lot.

2021-2509- BOA

I

0)

I/

a

~. I~•

1~-U

— S_~ b&J.%’l

(Speci1~’ other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on the following lines below your specific request for a variance/appeal:)

~ y. jod ~ ~*~* ~1~* ~O ~ç~U~+ S~ ~q’~ (~ uccu~d ~e ~o ~ (5~

9ETh~rV~ ko ~‘ ~cc* ~rd w~- ~ /~ 4c~ ~

SIGNATURE 0) OWNERJAPPLICANT DATE OF APPLICATION

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENTP.O. BOX 628 I COVINGTON, LOUISIANA 70434 [email protected] 985-898-2529

WWW.STPGOV.ORG

LC* \L\ (~(~ U

4—

N.I3TH STREET (ASPHALT)

0 0

o = 1/2” IRON ROD FOUND= 1/2 IRON ROD SET

= POWER POLE

L 3 ~= SEWER MANHOLE

~1E SHE ~ ~UIiE ~fiFIL

J#82230 N. 14TH STREET

(ASPHALT)

BUII,DLNG SETBACKS: REFERENCE SURVEY: Survey done by j~j Setback lines shall be verified by owner or contractor priorFRONT: N/A John G. Cummings and Associates, doted to any construction, as on abstract has not been performed bySIDE: N/A 6/6/2016. No. 16144—RESUB the undersigned.SIDE STREET: N/A BASIS FOR ANGLES: j~j~ Servitudes shown hereon are not necessarily exclusive.REAR: N/A The Recorded Subdivision Map. Servitudes of record as shown on title opinion or title policy willFLOODZONE NOTE: This is to certify that I have consulted the Federal be added hereto upon request, as surveyor has not performed anyInsurance Administration Flood Hazard Boundary Maps and found the title search or abstract.property described is located in Flood Zone(s) “C” with aBase Flood Elevation of N/A in occordance with Community N~IE~ This is to certify that I hove done an actual ground surveyand found that no encroachments exist either way across anyPanel No. 225205 0410 D; Revised: APRIL 21, 1999 property lines except as shown.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS DONE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND CONTROL; AND THAT THE SURVEY WASDONE ON THE GROUND AND IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE “STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR BOUNDARY BOUNDARY SURVEYS” ASADOPTED BY THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, BOARD OF REGISTRATION FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS FOR ACLASS SURVEY.

lOT 14 SQUARE 33. EST ALTON

I5y8’59

14

50’9071

00

(3,

A

o LOT

9.,

9071 1

COPYRIGHT © 2021ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDLOWE ENGINEERS. LLC

SURVEY MAP OF



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant & Representative: PPCW, LLC — Ronnie Bonner & Todd HeidenLocation of Property: 70487 Highway 21, Covington, LouisianaZoning of Property: HC-2 Highway Commercial Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Reduction of the required side landscape buffer.

OVERVIEWRequest by applicant to reduce the side landscape buffer on the north side of the property from10 feet to 3.6 feet for approximately 181 feet and to replace the required number of Class A &Class B trees.

STAFF COMMENTS

The objective of the request is to increase the width of the rear portion of the northern drive laneto allow to:

• move the “Bug Prep Area” from the front of the property to the rear, which will improvethe cleanliness and visual appearance of the site from Hwy 21.

• reduce damages to rims on the cars of the motorists during left turn within the drive aisleand create a safer traffic flow.

Staff does not have any objection to the requested variance considering that the main objective isto increase the safety of the traffic flow and to reduce potential damages to the vehicles of thepatrons using the carwash.

Should the Board be in favor of the request, it should be subject to the following:• Replace the required number of Class A & Class B tree removed, within the front, rear

and side buffers.

UU~~

44

‘%~ .4‘4’

4’.“4%

4’..~4 ‘4’

4’

S.“4’

21~‘3.

9

A

‘444

—4,

V

4,

1

/

• 1’

I cI.’II. ~LtItU.. I. ~‘ U~ II L II...~ IflI~fl~ J S’SaI~jII.I_II.I.. tIII~III~t’.I19IL_cII I

We are asking to widen our North Dnve Lane on the back half of our property by 68’.The wider drive lane will start approximately 220’ from the front property line (hwy 21).The wider,,çlrive lane will allow PPCW (Pelican Pointe CW) to move the Bug Prep Are~from thq4~Iont of the property to the rear of the property. Moving the Bug Prep to the

~~ir wi){ t/elp PPCW improve the cleanliness and appearance of the Hwy 21 visual.The w/d/r drive ~if I also allow customers to turn left without damaging there tires and

7i~i)5i~ the )*t~anØ a safer trattic 1)0w —_________________

_____ _____- .

Sl(i~i\ I IjRl~ ( )I ( )\\‘NLkJ\l’l’l.iC,\N I .‘ ( )l !\I~l~I IL i\ 1 l( ~i\’

1)1 P.I.R “II .~ I ~I P1 ,\N~’.I\(, & Ill I uT\II IlI(,’~.,;2’I (.4I\I\I,II)~~ 1(11 iSI~’c~ 11411 ‘I ~“,\l\(j~l~,II’~’)\ ()I~I.

~ ‘,Il’IO\ ()IU

POWERS OF THE BOARD TO GRANT VARIANCES/APPEALS

The St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment is limited in its power to grant variance/appealrequests as mandated by State and Parish Law. The board must consider the following in orderto determine if a variance/appeal is eligible for granting:

Is the variance/appeal request self-imposed?Variances/appeals may not be granted by the board if the request is considered a‘~personal preference~.

2. Does the variance appeal request constitute afinancial hardship?Variances/appeals may not be granted by the board if the request is considered strictly afinancial hardship.

3. Does the variance/appeal request present a practical djfficulty or unnecessary hardship?If the applicant can prove through testimony and presentation of factual documentationand/or evidence to the board that a practical difficultly or unnecessary hardship would beimposed if a variance/appeal was not granted, then the board may consider granting thevariance/appeal request.

4. Does the variance/appeal request impose an adverse effect on the adjacent neighbor ‘sproperty or surrounding neighborhood?If the variance/appeal request adversely effects an adjacent property owner and/or thesurrounding neighborhood in general, and testimony is forthcoming from same that canbe proven within reason that an adverse effect would be imposed, the board may decidenot to grant the applicant’s variance/appeal request.

5. Will the granting ofthe variance/appeal request constitute establishing a precedent?The board may deny the granting of a variance/appeal request which may result in theestablishment of a dangerous or unfavorable precedent to the parish.

LNo2. No3. Yes We want to regain use of the 50 of property at the rear of our lot. When originally

planning this de~elopment.we were told that a road would be constructed on this portionof ground from Greenbriar to the Flowers Bayou. which is why we set the pay stationwhere it is. As the other properties have been developed, neither of them have abidedby the road agreement, and a strip center has been developed on the property to thenorth.

4. No. What we are asking for ~vill not affect any property or neighborhood. The are weare requesting is at the right rear of our property, directly against the side of the stripcenter and to the rear of the offices behind us.

5. No. The area is far to the rear of the property, adjacent to the rear and sides of existingbuildings.

DFPARTMFNT OF PLANNING & DEVFLOPMEW[P0 BOX 628 COVINGTON. LOUISIANA 70434 I P1 \NNINGaSrPGOV ORG I 985-898-2529

WWW STPGO’~ ORG

/

4 ‘7,

CO’~ INGTON. LOL lSI;\~~ DA~ IL) L~\\ E LlE~\IRD115 SI) IITF~ I’

CONSULI1NG ENGINEERS

4’,

c

RS bo

~4

4 q

PELICAN POINTE L\RWASIISITE RENOVATIONS

PIc ~Ic

CO\INGTON. LOIISI\\A I)A~1D LA~E BEAIRD~sSO I~1F~ IS~

CONSULIVIG ENCINEC~PELICAN POINTE CARWASFISITE RENOVATIONS

;~~i~j r~i~i~ [• flt. ~!

~ !~ d ~JI ~

r

CO~ INGTON. LOt, ISIANA OA~ IL) LANE HEAlED

PELICAN POINTE CARWASHSITE RENOVATIONS

___________ ~

GRADING & DRAINAGE NGTES:

~ ~o-~910115 PlO 00*0000 0* 0*9*0 0001*000010*05 .1

000.19*5 *010 *9 tOlStOY 090090 V

! ~II13000*00*

0000*00000*00000 0~00000

0 0000000 00 lOt 00610* 0*000000 0000000*01 0010000(0 0

0*00000050 030 *00000 00*J*000010 00000 0 TIE00*00*9 0100, 0(000 OSlO 0

I—C

EXISTING GRADE0090 TO 00*00* O*000000l*O 0*00’ 090. 100 0 —

000101010 000*0000 000015T000 9TH 0*0.0100 ID

*1*00100*00 *0101*0 ([0

~:0

c GRADING ANG DRAINAGE PLAN C Lo260000 .40 0

8E-D(aD0~

a;

VPLAN DEVIATIGN:

0

*010 * 0*0000*000*0*000 9*9*5910 00

V

EROSIGN CGNTRGL WARNING:TOO 0*0I*CT* 000040 #9(000 00* 00 TIE 01001 00 0*ISI*IT 0* 0001100 *00*

0*0100000*11 900Tfl 00400000 001 001003 9 0000000*01 v

ja

0~

C

C0~

90%

oo 07/009 00*9 C

sn.t6/29/2021 0. 0000

_________ ;1 ‘i

UTILITY NOTES

wS.cSS*!flSmSSAPo.&STGSfS*TSA.GS

or, ~ GOA’OTO~. ErO~OEr, ‘oG GO 0101S V.

GSAOLPROSRW GOAlS S TO 0 05

UTIUTY WARNING:ITO UTTOOAOAOWTO 010111055005000 00050 0 —10515010500000000010050550 o

A~

0500000000005050531115 TOASTS 00

SflTO05TrSGOSI000005T000IS TO *0.000 SOlOIST 5000ST0055T000

UTIUTY PROVIGERS E—0010000 000 ~

F—

0UTIUTY NOTES

TO

0 001550100 51010 001T000 OTIS ST 00015100 0101 tOAST IS 105105 P05000 OOT5000TOTI 01 05090510 01011110 10 001100 10100100. 011 P0050000k C)

~H~1/0T

‘tzW !~6/29/2021

UTILITY PLAN

BOLLARD DETAIL

ALkALI/ti O•Q

LLCVV

VV

C/)ALt

-to

o ~

<F

-JLa)I-:

CScPSCl — ~

CONTRACTION JOINT

SCALE i-C-©

~c. [~fl5!t55” ~ ~ F~/~AL~Z.\ irr~ES• \v i-~~AL ~c. \j/~F”

~PSCT ~flASc TC~ ~LSSc Cc. ScEXi’. JOINT

DETAIL 2

( II I I‘ SIDEWALK PLAN

N

~

~

TNP. SIDEWALK DETAIL

SCALE DETAIL ©

~1~7~L’ -. I

DOWELED CONSTRUCTION JOINT

SCALE: 5/C.l-O ©DEAL p

0

V

-J

-SV

0-A

0I~0

0LA

TSP. SIDEWALK 0 PAVINO

SCALE DETAIL ©

1! _CONC. PAD

DETAIL pBARRIER CURR DETAIL

SCALE i/2 I

~ cCç~7~cC/QC?I

CONC. PAVINO

DETAIL

TTPICAL BACKFILL DETAILS FOR DRAINAOE PIPE

EL ©

CDNC. PATCNING

DETAIL p

GEOTEXTILE WRAP

DETAIL p

SCALE i•-O~

C*~ EALCECELA

CATCH BASIN CR 01

SCALE C)

CAl0 ES/CL/El

U)

DETAIL ©

FRAhUNG PLAN

ENTRY PAVILIGN BUILDING

E~ p

PPRTW. PLASIPAY STAYDA

ACALAVA 03)

• A~C AIM */ A ~flAAI CAAA/AlA AIr A ASAA AIM ATTN

TIP. AT SPDT CDL.

ANILE ~

LDCATIDN FDOT)NG

AAC1IGI? BGLT AGTES:

— I.TRAFFIC ISLAND/PAYSTATIDN

A DETAIL p

A J/4/I• AATAI AM

IA/IC

LI

TYPICAL ANCNDR BGLT

ANILE iW~I AG)

j/AAT&ATl ATEAL PEATA

TYPICAL FRAMINGSECTION ©

RO~ ROB OOROOA ~R

BEAM ED JGIGT CGNNECTIGN

SCALE ~~JA~I~• (~)

COPPER /0 CF ROOF FLITCN BEAM — END VIEW FLITCN BEAM — SIDE VIEW

FIR1•OJO1,71O 0 0 OROLI000

FUFCN BEAM — SIDE VIEW

RGDF BRACING WVERESTRGNG BACK IS REQUIRED ~~tz::~~ }1TTT1}~

FLIFCV BEAM — SIDE VIEW

Erin D. Cook

From:Sent:To:Subject:

Thursday, August 12, 2021 7:40 AMErin D. CookPelican pointe pics

•,.E. ,

lv -ii

,,t .~ .• y~, --‘:~,.7.’ ~

~ ~ •.:

• -,•4 ~tw~~v~‘ ~SI.; ~L

:t ~ -. • ••I, -

-7 ~ 44 I

~ •

/ 2:’— JI.q1~P’• ~

1~

- *

r

..* ~/•

•.I ‘ $4

, *, 7 3~ C- • 1 * •1

~ 14~ ---Ct — • - * *1ø~tw*s~w ~ - - *-~ •~ •4t:J~≤- 4$ ~ 1 1

~ ;t~ ~k’ I. ~ :t*. .:~ -

‘~~3’~ic .

.. ~r’-•’ •4Pf~ç•~

rJ

* ~ ‘ ~I* -

:-4*

~ ~ -- -

• • •• -‘ - • .. -t~

--%• -;, •t •• .• • ••‘•~

- a:. . S• - - •t :-_• - .~‘ -~ a

.4 4?,)

~ ~•1- ••~‘ • -t ~ • • •., ‘

• I?t4 .~,,-‘.•- • 1,~:rZ~ j 0’ 1

, —‘

~ ::r

•1••

‘‘1

-$

#7

~ :i ~.1;

.1

-‘

_~,• ~

I’..

-S

.,,- ~

— • 5’

A.

- •: ‘•-

-2

-‘Si

-

— r-t~ tflt:-:.- -.~

• -

4. -

- . 1~•. — . I

,I~4• r•~~-•-• ;.-4—-.; ‘p • •••_ ~ —.

4 - ~-

-- ‘-‘ - .-ok5r.~ ._

‘_-- ‘;.~‘~t;<~ ~“t ~I

‘a~~ :-t_• - -

~9, S ~ ;~-.. :~$~-“- ~

I- — — ~ •-‘b.~~

~ f~

- •I’~.:~. -

S! 1UO~UOD ai~ MOUN noA ssaiun s~uawq~ene JO SNU!I uo ~~!p ~ou op aseai~ :iivv~J3~

•, ~ ‘rr ~ ~rn;~ -. -

• ~ ~t: jjj:r;st ~• -

:‘ ~ • •“ - ,,~~1~

•:~ •.‘~. .-.-• ~_!‘2 ~10

•%_

b.,I, -

4-p

-‘I-I

F

-a

-

---4 - -I •t’~~ ~•‘

;-~., _.I’- ~.. .•j — 2-- •- • i

-s -. “

“4 a‘~ ‘s~~t- ~s-• :t ~≤L ..I

-rl• - ~ ,%.t ;‘.r• —— -~ ~ -

~~•/ - ;13- • - -

•.•~, ,.tt. -~ ~_j~~•-~ 4-I -:z~44:-_~ ~~bf~- - • • • a-

•%p~’ 14~ ~‘- *-. -

“1-- FZMt~

.4

.4. .

I..

.9,

3’

•.,:t r

0’

rc

~:‘r~’c..~ zv”-~¾.‘,r~51” ~

4,

: ~3’

~

I•‘l

~‘ ‘t~i’~’~ ~~ ~tr~:~%‘ ~ . ..t, Ct

~ ‘~t:4 :~t.’.:’

- ;.y.. ~ •, ~

:~ ,~.‘ ~

~ : :,:~€-

• ;‘ -. - .

~ “.~Ø*. ,•

-.4: ~*.•. ~

-. ‘ ~

—

4,.

4

~ ~

I.,,

-t Ic S

•t -~ ‘.4%.

-‘S

S . ~, •~.

7~.’ ~ ..:‘4:.,’~~-~ _p.. -~ ~ .4 (~4

‘t~-~’ ..,_I- -.

‘- ~ .W’-&”~ .~ .jki - .~

1 ... ‘4. -.4

-4 q :-: ~

- %44 ~ ..,‘.%. .1~i.

t 4 ~ 4—

‘t.—~m’ :~- ‘.V_’~~.

~ *a..≠:.

--4’-•14 C

4-

r

.4-. 4—’-.. — ~-

7 4. .4• .4-’

~ -.4

— ‘\ 4.

• 0 ‘~‘ 4.4 7. -.~*s 4 :- •

- 4-. >z_• ‘- - •‘ ~ -V e

~! ‘ -..4;.

447 • ~ <-i,• ~‘ •.4./7,-.4’. - ~

‘‘

4•4;. ‘4•

I,

-4 4’~~, -4

n

-‘‘ ‘:

4,-”

,1-J -—

I:—. •. .‘.11

- 4 .

• q.

~%Y~4~ j’C ~..t ~ iC- I. - ~

• ••,. ,., I b,

• j~.:~_ ~ it •-

it •,•_-

¼~~

Li

tr

I t•• -4 ~fIj ¼ •~i..t r~

• ,‘~P4 ,~• •‘ :~‘~;~ ?‘

e~ •≠~Ct *4~~

~. ‘.• ~ ~ :‘WM 7• •‘

1:’

‘I

f..:

‘$1, ~ •.‘ ~

4. ~,•:

‘It.

• -s~• -

t ii

‘IL

H—•~ :11

tA ‘

-CV.’4¼!.

•‘~ ~I.~‘ ~- ,•

•~-‘ ~-:• ••~ ~

It

IIII

q

1•

V..— ~

-~ • •‘

~*‘~.~S:* ~‘%< a

C.; P • ~ — .%

- ~4•;y ~ • .~ ~

- a‘C. •.‘ • ;•.

-d ;~r. --, •-- .~:- - . ‘• . —-, - • r

— r - —

- r. . r l

— — II •~•~ p

~• .t4 A 4r ~ - - ~ -!!~ ~ •~%%

• :~ -e,,, ~S~~:i— 4 — * ~ t

$ w ;•— —

$• - . - ~ .. —

“5’. ~-~r,’ C

• -- •. ‘S .•-~7~- 3~T~ ~:

-~ 4 -. 4- • ~ . -

¶4. ~ •-: • • A-— -

*4

IL: N

1,,

A

C

•• ~ i

I

4

-4-

4:

- . - . . ...≥,. . .~. ~ ~

.~ S. ~ S..-. .~ 4~t.”~ r

.S.~ ~I~%•r~4 ~ .~ ~ S

~ ‘

5 j’’. ~~

S5 ~ .. S.

.5 -~ .5 ~ ~

i~ S.. ,• ~ . —

::~ ~ :~.:~ ~

• ~ : ~~•.~ .. ~ r

C ~k:~ ~ - • ~ ‘.

St ~ ~. -;; ~ -

•-:~- ~ .~ S

- ~: ~ ~ 14.-..-.-”~ ..

~~

~ ;I~;~8 ~ 4.‘4 ).V— ~ ~ 4, ‘5

~s •~‘~ ‘‘~~~~‘‘! •. •

‘~4 ~~• * • 4*

• .2 ‘ •S. ~4

S S

.5. 5 ‘5 %. .•%-

•~ t..,. )_~.•

~ . . ~ 4 •.-, .—.5 ‘*5 ~S.S

• • . .~‘ .;.~ ,.. * —

‘S . •• •~ •,,~. ~ .5. 44. ~ \ ~ 5—

L... ~

•5’

V . •. •$ ,••‘.•.• ‘4,.4 5f . ~

5 ‘S .•~ ~‘ ‘ •t._ . ‘-‘4.5. ~‘. ‘S.

5-.

~. ~•‘.

:4

£~• -%.~ S.

5,,

17

5Jt~

.5.S.

4-

C

1.

‘-‘~—-, .€‘4~.

•1’

.4, ~5

‘5,

C

I’ ‘4 . . .5 5._’ 4,S S ~4S.•*~, .

5. 5•. ‘,-•~‘‘ ~~5 S - S ~ - ~•~.‘:‘~ -‘t.~:

.5 5- *S••~)~ ~ q~- •!~~

:~~q ~~•—~ •~

~s.~t• ~

—. A.~• -

.~..•‘• ;•_.•~. •~•-

••~% x• . ~ • .-

•1~~ ~ .•..-•..

• ,.••~

• . •1 ~ -

• 4.

4~-.



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant & Representative: Roxanne LepreLocation of Property: 18001 LA Tung Road, Covington, LouisianaZoning of Property: A-i Suburban Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Reduction of the required 50 no cut buffers.

OVERVIEWRequest to reduce the required:

• 50 foot no cut buffer to 10 feet on the east side of the property, for a distance ofapproximately 50 feet from LA Tung Road.

• Reduce the required 50 foot no cut buffer along the natural drainage crossing the property.

STAFF COMMENTS

The objective of the requests is to allow for the placement of a driveway away from the existingnatural drainage way and to eliminate the need to cross over the natural drainage way, which runsdiagonally from LA Tung Road to rear northwest corner of the property. There is no objection tothe request considering that there is only 90 feet between the eastern property line and the drainageway, preventing the ability to maintain the required 50 buffers and clear sufficient space toconstruct a driveway.

2021 -251 2- BOA

i II

. II II :

II

I

I jI I

L_ -----aLATUNG

~0

MAP PREPARED FOR .RO.KA..NNE LEPRE* %~ ‘iii

0

0-F’

C,0

-1

F’)

(Base Bearing)N04’08’l 5”E—327. 74’

U’m0

m

-<

-o

zzzC)

C)0

>

zp

t~1Cl)0)

CD

0~Cf)

0)CD

-o —~ CD <~ CD

I CD

CDo —

-~ 9~-C

‘0~ 0

‘p

C ~O‘.—~~

0)pC0)

7

0

0

N0048’l O~W—574.76’

I

F~)

21z>

Cm-u >-U-oo-n

rnz >I

zmmxlzC)

;~u s>

-..--.~-r c-~~

CD

D CO Uco0—•

~ ~-~0

D D —o•-< ‘-‘-0 -~a “0

cn D DO

r-o ~.o0. D -‘-.

—10 (0I—

c~I’)Z0—~xl~ C”~’CD

>°~>~ 3u~’z 03~’i~)p ~5•~P~D

~•C0’~< o,.3~1~ CD ~~—~3 >.U

DO~00• 0(0

00.,.,. .-.-0-

‘c~ ~•0(D’O O~’-’

0~5_ ~_,

Cfl~CD~ ~

CD0)0. ~‘ ~i..< ‘-‘-

—~ CD L~40.

0)

CO ~ O~

= 0

N03’56’l 6”E—25426’

0

HzCD

CC

I TCD

O 00p--10~

I0

O 000

C~3 I

o0

0DCD~

(Must verify prior to Construction)Building SetbacksFront:Side:Rear:Side Street:

xo

ii Ii ti II~ Cl) ‘1 -n ZCD C5 D D ~lD ,-.- O~ 0.

0~’ ,D~ g

—~Cfl0)CflOo CD “.JQQ~‘ -r~o~w

OD -D (0

~<~%3O~ -~

U

CD__

-~01 CJ1~

o

j~r ~-~ (0I~ o~

Cl)—-

-I- -

S00’48’1 0”E—571 .50’

SERVITUDES SHOWN HEREON (IF AN’r) ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSIVE.SERVITUDES OF RECORD AS SHOWN ON liThE OPINION OR irnE POUCY~IMLL BE ADDED HERETO UPON REQUEST AS THE UNDERSIGNED HASPERFORMED NO ABSTRACT OR liThE SEARCH. THE UNDERSIGNED HASMADE NO ATTEMPT TO LOCATE ANY BURIED U11U11ES OR ASSOCIATEDPEDESTALS.THIS MAP IS IN ACCORDANCE Will-I THE STANDARD DETAILEDREQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE ACCURACY STANDARDS OF A D~ SURVEYAND THE APPUCABLE STANDARDS OF PRAC11CE CITED IN LAC 46: LXI.

July 30, 2021

Re: side landscape buffer reduction

To Whom It May Concern,

I am proposing to enter the five-acre portion of my property at the Southeast corner shown on thesurvey provided. Accessing the property at this location will require that I reduce the side landscapebuffer from fifty feet to ten feet from La Tung Road North approximately fifty feet. Approving thisproposed access location will eliminate the need to cross the natural drainage way that runs through theproperty diagonally from the Northwest corner to the Southeast toward La Tung Road.

Respectfully,

Roxanne Lepre

July 29, 2021

Re: Adjacent property owner driveway

To Whom It May Concern,

Roxanne Lepre is proposing to locate her access driveway adjacent to my Southwest property cornernear Louisiana Tung Road. I understand a portion of this driveway will be within the fifty foot no cutbuffer but have no object n with this pro sed location.

:::‘z’ ~ PPr ~31~



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant & Representative: Chad AlmquistLocation of Property: 24401 Highway 190, Lacombe, Louisiana.Zoning of Property: CBF-1 Community Based Facilities Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Waiver of the required 8 foot opaque fence.

OVERVIEWRequest by applicant in a for a waiver of the required 8 foot opaque fence on the north and eastsides of the property where abutting A-2 Suburban Zoning District.

STAFF COMMENTS

The site is proposed to be developed with a recreational facility canoe/kayak and trail adventurebusiness on a 0.90 acre portion of a 3.90 property (see attached drawing). Staff is not opposed tothe requested waiver of the 8’ opaque fence, since the objective is to preserve maintain the existingnatural wooded environment and open space on the property and to encourage the natural path andmovement of the existing wildlife within the entire property.

/

/p

/

~

190

We are requestinci a waiver of the 8’ high opaque fence requirement per St. Tammany Parish code.This fence would restrict the natural path and movement of the wildlife residing on the property,,vhich are essential in providing our clients a memorable experience.

_____ August_2 2021SIGNATURE OF OWNERJAPPLICANT DATE OF APPLICATION

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENTP0 BOX 628 COVINGTON, LOUISIANA 70434 I PLANNING@STPGOV ORG 985-898-2529

WWW STPGOV.ORG

NOTES

EXHIBIT A

PROPOSEDA5GR~OATEPAA1U1iIO MIDDDE’S AISLE

i This PLAN IS FOR CONCEPTUAL PLANNING PURPOSESCRAY AND ShALL NOT DC USED FOR PERMITONUORCONSTRUCT1VEI PURPOSES

2 SURVEY INFORMATION SHOWN IS FROM A ROUNECAYSURVEY PREPARED DV ANNE SURVEYING. INC. DATUDAUGUST 0.2017 AND SURFACE FEATURES LOCATADRY ARAJADALLW. DROWN I ASSOCIATES,INC ON MAY?. 2020

2. SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED VINThINUNINCORPORATED ST TMRMNY PURINA *11015C OR SC N11.V ZONR D AZ

4 ThIS SITE PLAN ASSUMES AREZOMNG OP CAP-ICOD.RAUIITY SANDS FACILITIES OSTRICTIMTNA RURAL

N THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONRS AL C. PERFEMAMAPNO 22S2DN026000ATED42 lENT

/ I

_aU I ,L

/

.. // / L’~~ ~7N-~.

FANLOTDV’IVU / ‘PRWATE~~~~

/ HOUSE I I

//

~hiF ~\\ LZVI~ I

LOCATION OFREQUIRED FENCE

CTA VARIANCE REQUEST3. ACRES

3.55 ACRES

PROPOSEDWOOD CUSTOMER

THROOM

AGGREGATEIYJRN000UNO

~ ,~‘._

// MAIN PRIVATE

~ ~3~7~-RESIDENCE

ECISTEAG PRIVATEORIVEWAT TO REMAIN

I)/

// -1r A /7:

—I SHI ACDA2IDC ROT FOR CORSWUCTION F A I R VV A Yf-~— SCALE ChORDS CONCEPTUAL -FEBRUARY 2201 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN MEET

COG — SODs ER — — — 1~’S~ ~_~~D~_: CONSUI1 INC rNCINI EIUt~C CANOE AND TRAIL ADVENTURESREAl SERB DY D€SADPTIOI ICYTh.CALDCIDCDDDJGATAL.ROflC ~ LACOMBE. LOUISIANA


Case File Number: BOA Case No. 2021-2529-BOAInitial Hearing Date: 10 05 2021Date of Report: 09 24 2021

GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant & Representative: William P. HollidayLocation of Property: North side of Perrilloux Road (Parcel E), Madisonville

Louisiana.Zoning of Property: A-2 Suburban Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Waiver of the required 50 foot no cut buffer

OVERVIEWRequest by applicant for a waiver of the required 50 foot no cut buffer on the east side of theproperty.

STAFF COMMENTS

The objective of the request is to allow for the placement of the driveway towards the east side ofthe property. There is no objection to the request considering that, as shown on the attached picture,there is a utility pole and a fire hydrant located in the center of the 155.19 feet width/frontage ofthe property, preventing the ability to maintain the required 50 foot buffers on each side and clearsufficient space to access the property.

GRE ENS PACE

PERRILLOUX TRACE

x0-J

ILU

I

~2I

€3

77

78

79

80

81

134

135

136

126

13782

83

133

PINE

124 ~3

138125

503 N. £FFERSON A VENUE

George Hurst Provosty IrrevocableTrust Agreement

SHOWING A ~JRYEY o~ A MINOR SUBDI’,ISION OF 25.271 ACRES INTO PARCELSA, B, C, D, & E, LOCATED IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 7SOUTH, RANGE 10 EAST, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LOUISIANA.

COI4NGTON, LA 70433

Z JOHNG CUMMINGSucon~~ No. 4770

~. PROF 5LOWA~.

~

I I Il

PERRILLOUX TRACEj S89’42’57E89~9 8.5 .,~- >4 >4

0a0U,

E~

g PARC~N3501 AL A~RES

~—SEE NOTES FOR (1)~_SER%I7UOE WIDTh N89’42’57~W 610.02’

PARCEL E14.163 ACRES

S8942 7 E 462.91

PARCE~’~\2.458 ACRES

N~9’4 ‘57W 393.52’S89’42’57E~ ‘\ ~3~A

~ PARCEL D~ 1.648 ACRES 15!

338.91’ .i~a2__A

(985) 892-1549 John G. Cummings and Associates FAX (985) 892-9250

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURkfYORS

THIS FLAT REPRESENTS A PHVSICAL SIJRI~EY MADETHE GROUND BY ME. OR ThOSE UNDER MY ENREC I.AND IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPUCABI.ESTANDARDS OF PRACTICE AND BEARS A CLASSSUR’4EY. ROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR

DATE: 3/10/2020

.d

JOB NO. 20029 REV1SED:*oGING SER~FT1JDE 6/25/2CHANGING SERV. SZE 7/8/20

S.

•55•~ 7’

- ~ ~ ~-—,• ~

5-

S.

~s~; ~

. ;f ~~5_~:

/ ;~;~-~ ~:

-.5 ‘.5. 5 5(55J % ~5.

-.5 1’•’)“ Sc:, —

—~ 4,

.5

u;,, -~_---r -“~

5’- 5’ -~

.5.

- 5~.Ø ;•‘0

- 5’-

to’

5, 5 ‘z -~ ,

L ~, 5~’~P,-S - ~• ‘5’—- .: -

~ 5. — VS

c . - ~ r •“ ‘~‘ ;c’ .: ::- - ~ •-

• .~ ‘:. -~z~’:5~ •- - )~5’ ~ ‘~ — -, - ‘5

‘S 3 • ...~5” .5 -:~-‘~ ~- - .~‘- - -~ - —~ .5”≥ S

~ ~ ~_S_~S%.-~-. ~ r’~~ “ .~- —. A. ç~,.- —; ~‘~-‘~ ,~ -~ -~-.~• . ,~..- ‘

‘S ~ c~c ~ ~.. .,4~__) ~- ~ ~. ~

-. 5’ •5• 2 •~- - ..~ ~i - “S ~ ,Z~ ‘~~‘ ( ‘-i- - ‘~‘ -.

-~

‘5

S.

—‘S

—4

—

.5<,

.5

-

--‘I,.

,1

.,- S

- ‘L,. •

I. r‘.5. j ‘5~

V

, •:~-~“ , ‘S

S -~

S - ~ ‘~ •‘ •‘. -.

/ - I t.54~5S•_5 • --

- ~- S.:

‘S S

II •2

‘45

555

.5 5,•

~ ~~~-:‘- ~:

* ‘~: :~~- ~ ~‘:-~

I • ~v:S 5 -- 4 •‘-Y”~-~t -:

S ~J~5 ps~ - —,I . S — I —

S t ‘5

-S — i’ç..i ~I SI ~

S.. J SI 5, -‘5

,,._S_

• ,,~‘rP;~-_s,.--’ -

~ I

5555.5 ~-,

~ 4 .5 5 S_S.

•,r -: ~ - ,~

1~ •~ I

S.,~S. ~ ~:-,.‘• I ‘ -

.5 __5 ,‘_-• S -is ._‘i•__~ ~oS.”•_)_5 ‘r-’~-- ~ S.

.5 5

SS — I ~-‘S ~-•.

‘l, is4~• 5, . -~ S

~ •“ :‘ ‘~ -,..S.~’S ~ S.

S ,~ ~-‘ - . “I .~_~_1,S~ ~ ~, ~ ‘.~ ‘,.~r . 5-S — •~•, ~S

.5 . -~ S S _,.• S .5 •,‘5 .‘~:— _5_. 5 5 5 5 5 5 ~ I —

- S S. — - 5,—S

~ 1 £ ~“S~ ;;f~~ ~ ~5~ 4, “5• -~ .~‘ .- ~ ~ S

;~ .5% ~L‘•5. ~ — 05%

.:• ~, ~

--‘ES •?~i

5- “5’

1

q

~— -‘

~5

I

S“S -‘

‘Sr

I

5 _5

4,



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant: Phiski LLC John MalinskiRepresentative: C M Combs Construction, LLC — Christopher CombsLocation of Property: 64231 Highway 434, Lacombe, Louisiana.Zoning of Property: PBC-1 Public Business Campus Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: After the fact request to replace required trees to be

preserved within street & side buffersOVERVIEW

Request by applicant for an after the fact request to replace the required trees to be preserved withinthe street planting buffer area and within a 154 foot portion of the south side buffer planting area,with the required number of Class A & Class B trees.

STAFF COMMENTSAs shown on the attached tree preservation plan, some of the trees to be preserved have beenremoved within the front and southern planting buffers. The site plan shows the remaining trees tobe preserved and additional trees to be provided. Should the Board be in support of the proposedrevised landscape plan, it should be subject to staff’s recommendations (see below chart).

Planting Required Existing Proposed trees to Staff RecommendationBuffer number of trees trees to be be planted

preservedFront 1 Class A & 1 Total of 10 No additional trees Provide a revised

150 feet Class B per 20 Class A proposed to be landscape plan meeting thefeet Credits planted minimum required number

8ClassA ofClassA& Class B trees8 Class B and an additional 4 Class A

& 4 Class B trees tomitigate some of the trees

removed.South 1 Class A & 1 Total of 20 1 Class A — Willow Provide 5 Class A & 5Side Class B per 30 Class A Oak Class B trees within the329.9 feet Credits 1 Class B — 1 River area identified as limit offeet 11 Class A Birch work/along parking row to

11 Class B mitigate the trees removed.

PARCEL B

PARCEL C

4%~

4%

.%4.

‘utj3~ r~ogg 0

F

• s~. —

-‘i. :~, -.

~ Fr’ -* • *

‘~; ~ ,. -

I

b

:~

1/

Cleared

Entrance Drive Cleared

DIT H‘I__________ ________________ 1~ _______

~O5~i~

-IQ,‘2’•

~i1 ~

I ~I • I a I II ~ ~ S II £

~I—~0~E’-_--.-•—0

.)fl---=-,_ ==.=--

SITE ANALYSISBUILDING 4.809 SF

PARKING REOUIREO 24 SPACES

PARKING PROVIDED 30 SPACES

PlANT SCHEDL IL

L

FRC-I

~A.2

A SITE PLAN

£Z~I ~L~9~Z1

SCALE: 1=40-0’

I\~

~ui

‘.8<AZ_J _J

z~

w

~ LA-i

‘~ L2~

~ 8

_____ ~~JI i:;=L~J =~ C

~

Al LAYOUT & MATERIALS PLAN SCALE: 1=2.0-0”

EXISTING TREE TO REMOVE

Q EXISTING PINES

EXISTING DEAD PINES

EXISTING WATER OAKS

Zq

PBC-130G.-c4”

r~, ~J

‘.8

LI)z-J

Al TREE PRESERVATION PLAN

>-

0—I0I

wPBc-1

PBC-1w ~q.v.,. .j,

~ LA-2SCALE: 1”~2O-O’ (D



GENERAL INFORMATIONApplicant & Representative: Steve BlancLocation of Property: 72194 Formosa Drive, Covington, Louisiana.Zoning of Property: A-5 Two-Family Residential Zoning DistrictVariance(s) Requested: Reduction of the width of a two-way driveway.

OVERVIEWRequest by applicant for a reduction of the required minimum width of a two-way driveway from24 feet to 16 feet.

STAFF COMMENTSThe objective of the request is to allow for an existing 16 foot driveway to continue to provideaccess to an existing duplex and also to a proposed duplex. As shown on the attached survey, Lot16 is a substantial lot of record which does not meet the required lot width under the A-5 ZoningDistrict and is also only accessible from a narrow driveway. The locationlconfiguration of theexiting driveways on the adjacent lots and the presence of utility power poles along the northernproperty line create a hardship and is preventing the construction the of the required 24 foot twoway driveway. Should the Board be in favor of the request, it should be subject to the following:

• Construct the 16 foot driveway from the existing roadway to the property line.• Provide warning sign to traffic exiting the property indicating: Caution: narrow driveway.• Construction of the Road and Sign shall be installed before occupancy of the duplex can

be granted.

I-I.’0

0(I)

(~$I

I ~,

~

\\

72194 Formosa Drive, Covington, LA

Request for Variance of Driveway width from 24’ to 16’

September 7, 2021

The lot is located on a turn in Formosa Drive. The west side of the proposed driveway is restricted by anexisting powerpole and three small trees and the east side is against the property line. A 24’ drivewaywould discharge on the neighbor’s driveway and conflict with the existing trees. A 16’ drive exiting fromthe property will tie into the existing street. As the interior drive starts to turn west, it widens to 24’.

The four mailboxes are installed on the east side of the existing road behind the mailbox. Each tenant isresponsible for their garbage pickup and will put their cans on the shoulder of the road in front of thelot.

I~t~

~_9~

lB Construction,Lot 16 Azalea Pa

72194 Formosa DriveDriveway Plaji

/~

—- - • t.essrytpzi S

• I’

• t 4.

9/7/2021 Mail - OdsOO344Cpc - Outlook

4. 1:’

.4.

•‘I~ ~:

:~ ‘r‘-I

A:

- :tc~~.

“k ~•4jl ~.

•1

P q :“~ ;‘./•. ::‘

~ øJ~j~ (~,

~ /3 4L ~,: t’;.. ~ -,

-I.

~ ‘Ii-.’;)’~• ~

• ;-.ø;Jc;~.1 i-.

‘./c,,c•i•I~;.;_LJ•~.&~—:~;c ‘,

.;.~c •~ ?.~4:K~~’—L~— -— - —

:~ ‘:• :.

-~ :.~

2;.

-4....

~. ~•.

-.

‘4.,,‘1•,

-~• ;-~l )tL5?.~---4. •2’~~a —~ ~

14

.~ ~• 1.

‘\ ~ •,q/ ~ ,. ‘Id

~ •i~•~, • ,:• ? s;~, ~ I • • •

:4~ -~.

N-. ‘~- * • -.

;Z~•’ •jY-‘‘Ii -

P36 31818-3341

t

V..

I-’ ?-

;4’.-;.:.;,~ ~—‘k~- :J’~

-~~ •• •;•

—‘• .r •, - -•~• • ‘•V/•_._ •~ ~ •~•~• . • •. .—~•.• •.. •~. •—~ — — — -— ~ I

C —— — — ——~ — — —~ C —~ ‘ — I

•.7•~_•. ~ •.~.-:f .~L’~’ *4.J.”’3lt•~4r.t~..:1• ~st::~.y.S A — •1— ~ ~— ~ -~ ~ J

—~ ~ - 4 g • ~ I — 4. —

Y ,.~4. •~•

1--.” ~:-2; - .

:~~‘t;~: ~

I. •

— ~

-~:;- P~~I .~Z~-’ ~ -~

~t ~

~ ~ ~

-. •• •. •. ~ ~ 4. -

4. -.. :‘—‘.- •t13- ‘- • .- . .‘:. • •_~ t. ~- ..~,C .--, ..-. —. .- • ~ —

https://outlook.oWIce.com/mail/[email protected]/iflboXid/AAQkADQ1’RiND95LTNmMzEtNDlwO~iODBmLWUwNmQ5ZDM2flUzMWAQABZZl3OVOj9DmlGJ6MYwfl0U%3D/SXS/~.. 1/2

agenda meeting - St. Tammany Parish Government

Documents

Transcript of agenda meeting - St. Tammany Parish Government