A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY ...

48
Brigham Young University Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive BYU ScholarsArchive Undergraduate Honors Theses 2021-06-18 A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI Ronald A. Zegarra BYU Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht BYU ScholarsArchive Citation BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Zegarra, Ronald A., "A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 196. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/196 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected].

Transcript of A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY ...

Brigham Young University Brigham Young University

BYU ScholarsArchive BYU ScholarsArchive

Undergraduate Honors Theses

2021-06-18

A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR

MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI

Ronald A. Zegarra BYU

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht

BYU ScholarsArchive Citation BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Zegarra, Ronald A., "A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI" (2021). Undergraduate Honors Theses. 196. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studentpub_uht/196

This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected].

i

Honors Thesis

A FRET FLOW CYTOMETRY-BASED SCREENING ASSAY FOR MULTIPLEX

ANALYSIS OF METABOLITES IN T. BRUCEI

Ronald Alejandro Zegarra

Submitted to Brigham Young University

in partial fulfillment of graduation requirements for University Honors

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Brigham Young University

June 2021

Advisor: Kenneth A. Christensen Honors Coordinator: Walter Paxton

ii

iii

iv

v

ABSTRACT

Kinetoplastid parasites are a significant public health issue in some tropical and

subtropical regions of the world. Kinetoplastid parasites all require glycolysis for survival,

with host glucose key for ATP production. One such parasite, Trypanosoma brucei,

exclusively metabolizes glucose in its bloodstream form. Trypanosomal glycolysis is unique

because it displays unconventional structural features. Hence, glucose metabolism has been

studied extensively in T. brucei and is a therapeutic target in kinetoplastid parasites.

The lack of in vivo analytical techniques for measuring vital glycolytic metabolites in

situ has restricted the ability of researchers to test, with high sensitivity and specificity, the

essential roles glycolytic metabolites play in both parasite differentiation and regulation of

metabolism. Using endogenously expressed Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)

biosensors, we have been able to track in vivo glucose concentrations via flow cytometry in

cultured T. brucei parasites, which has enabled unprecedented analysis of the dynamics of

intracellular glucose under changing extracellular conditions, including a screening assay for

potential glucose uptake inhibitors.

We are currently expanding our FRET biosensor suite to measure glycolytic

metabolites and simultaneously screen for specific glycolytic inhibitors throughout the

metabolic pathway. We expect to use biosensors for glucose, ATP, pH, and pyruvate.

However, these sensors typically use the same fluorescent proteins, making it extraordinarily

difficult to monitor multiple biosensors in the flow cytometer. To overcome this limitation,

we present a cellular barcoding method in which multiple cell lines expressing a different

biosensor have unique labels to separate individual sensor responses via flow cytometry.

Each cell line is distinguishable from one another using a cell surface staining scheme or

vi

barcode. Using this approach, we demonstrated the separation of up to four unique

populations, thus allowing the analysis of multiple analytes in a single screening assay. As

proof of principle, we demonstrated the barcoding of two cell lines expressing cytosolic

glucose or ATP sensors and simultaneously measured cytosolic glucose and ATP. We found

that cellular barcoding does not interfere with parasite cell viability, and cell populations

remained distinguishable over time. We also showed that the individual FRET biosensor

responses remain unaffected by barcoding. Finally, we demonstrated that this method could

be used in a high-throughput screening assay for T. brucei and other kinetoplast parasites to

identify compounds that inhibit glycolysis.

vii

viii

ix

x

xi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank the BYU College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, the

BYU Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, the BYU Honors Department, and the

National Health Institute for funding research presented as a part of this thesis. Without their

support, progress on this project and my personal development would have been substantially

less.

Also, I want to thank my advisor and mentor, Dr. Kenneth A. Christensen, for

accepting an inexperienced and ambitious undergraduate and taking the time to help me

become a scientist. I want to thank Dr. Christine Ackroyd for being a second mentor in the

lab and constantly feeding my curiosity. Thank you to Charles Voyton for initially

conceiving the idea of barcoding biosensor-expressing trypanosomes and Jacob Vance for his

initial work selecting and testing various dyes as barcodes. Thank you to the Jim Morris

Laboratory at Clemson University for transfecting the cell lines used.

I am incredibly grateful to my constant companion, Isabelle Anne Zegarra. Her

support means more than she could ever know. And finally, for my parents, Ronald I.

Zegarra and Violeta Y. Zegarra, for the long hours of work and the immense sacrifice they

made to give my siblings and me the opportunity to a better life in the United States. I could

not have done this without any of them—esto es para ustedes.

xii

xiii

xiv

xv

CONTENTS Title i

Abstract v

Acknowledgments xi

Table of Contents xv

Introduction 1

Results & Discussion 6

1.1 Barcode staining scheme could potentially distinguish four 6

different parasitic populations, simultaneously

1.2 Biosensor response is unaffected by barcoding 7

1.3 Biosensor response is statistically significant 9

1.4 Multiplex screening assay 11

1.5 Drug assay supports multiplex biosensor efficiency 13

Conclusions 15

Methods 15

1.1 Cells, Constructs, and Reagents 15

1.2 T. brucei transfection and localization of biosensors 16

1.3 T. brucei culture 16

1.4 Sample preparation and flow cytometry 16

1.5 Selection and optimization of barcoding dyes 17

1.6 Testing parasite viability and population distribution of barcoded cells 18

over time

1.7 Creating a Z-prime experiment and analyzing high and low glucose

Response over time 18

xvi

1.8 Running a barcoded multiplex assay 19

1.9 Testing barcoded biosensor response with drug treatments 19

Further Acknowledgements 20

Abbreviations 21

References: 21

xvii

xviii

xix

xx

1

INTRODUCTION

According to the World Health Organization, the kinetoplastids Trypanosoma brucei,

Trypanosoma cruzi, and Leishmania spp. parasites are the causative agents of some of the most

significant neglected tropical diseases endemic, mainly in tropical and subtropical areas. 1,2

Roughly half a billion people are at risk of contracting these diseases. Current estimates indicate

that more than 20 million individuals are infected with some form of a kinetoplastid pathogen,

resulting in extensive morbidity and more than 100,000 yearly deaths combined. 3

Unfortunately, many treatments for kinetoplastid parasite infections have serious adverse side

effects, including death.4,5,6 Hence, identifying additional drug targets and developing

kinetoplastid-specific inhibitors that could become new therapeutics are unmet needs.

Kinetoplastid parasites are motile protozoans and include the human pathogens T. brucei,

T. cruzi, and Leishmania spp. Kinetoplast protozoa share significant similarities in both cellular

biology and metabolism7 that are distinct from mammalian cells. For example, kinetoplastids

have unique peroxisomes (known as glycosomes) in which the bulk of glycolysis occurs.7,8 In

addition, kinetoplastid parasites are vector-borne diseases. As a result, they have complex life

cycles in which they survive in different life stages in insects or mammalian hosts.7-9 Although

the abrupt changes in environmental conditions between life stages could negatively affect the

protozoan parasite, T. brucei, has evolved survival mechanisms to adapt to nutrient availability

changes. 10-13 Importantly, the changes in life stages mean that all kinetoplastid protozoan

parasites depend on host metabolism for survival.7-9 In its mammalian bloodstream form, the

parasites rely heavily on glucose metabolism.

Glucose is essential for kinetoplastid survival in the mammalian host, where it acts as

both a signal and a metabolic energy source.4,13-15 For example, when T. brucei moves from the

2

tsetse fly to the mammalian bloodstream, the parasite experiences increased glucose.13,16 High

glucose is the signal that induces parasite differentiation to the bloodstream form (BSF), which

can survive in the mammalian host.10-13 Importantly, BSF T. brucei relies nearly exclusively on

glucose metabolism for survival within the host. Glucose also plays a pivotal role in Leishmania

spp. infections16,17 where glucose and its metabolites are essential for the anaplerotic synthesis of

glutamate, the primary free amino acid needed to differentiate from the insect form to the

intracellular form found in its mammalian host.16,17

Since glucose metabolism plays a critical role in the kinetoplastid life cycle and viability,

targeting glucose metabolism is an attractive strategy for generating anti-parasite therapeutics.4

For example, a recent report outlines how a specific inhibitor of trypanosome

phosphofructokinase, an essential enzyme in glycolysis, kills BSF T. brucei in a mouse model in

which the parasites had migrated to the brain. Importantly, this phosphofructokinase inhibitor

had no substantial host toxicity.18 Since this mouse model of T. brucei infection is similar to the

late-stage disease in humans,18 this work demonstrates that parasite-specific glycolysis inhibitors

are viable therapeutic targets.

Our focus here is to develop a screening approach to identify small molecules which

impact specific steps of T. brucei glycolysis. Such inhibitors could be used as either metabolic

probes to illuminate individual steps of metabolism or act as trypanocidal compounds that would

serve as lead compounds for drug development. Regardless of the final use of identified

compounds, the screen itself requires analysis of the concentrations of individual metabolites

consumed or created in different stages of glycolysis. Advances made in the measurement of

glycolytic metabolites, as carried out here, therefore have significance for the field of multiplex

3

assay development and metabolomics, the study of small-molecule metabolites in cells, tissues,

and organisms.19

Obtaining broad coverage of the metabolome is challenging because of the broad range

of physicochemical properties of the small molecules in question.19,20 Metabolomic studies

currently utilize primarily two techniques; mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance

(NMR).19,20 While both techniques can measure a high number of metabolites simultaneously,

neither is ideally suited for measuring metabolites in intact organisms.19-21 Small-molecule

fluorescent probes have a long history quantifying relative and absolute concentrations of

intracellular analytes such as pH and Ca2+.22 For example, the Christensen lab has used probes

coupled with fluorescein, which can report pH, for pH quantification in T. brucei glycosomes.23,24

Using a signal peptide fluorescein conjugate, such as F-PTS1, pH conditions inside glycosomes

were dynamically analyzed under starvation conditions.24

Recently, a wide variety of genetically encoded Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)

sensors have been developed to measure various metabolites, as well as pH, protein activity, and

protein-protein interactions.15, 22-27 Such biosensors can be targeted to individual cellular

locations, including individual organelles, thus allowing unprecedented analysis of changes in

individual metabolite concentration in live cells. Moreover, to increase the efficiency of these

non-destructive monitoring techniques, a fluorescent protein glucose biosensor (FLII12Pglu-

700μδ6 ) has been used to measure intracellular glucose with flow cytometry. This combination

of techniques has enabled the measurement of observable changes in glucose concentrations

within the cytosol and the glycosomes of live T. brucei.25 These intracellularly expressed

biosensors offer invaluable tools for monitoring in situ metabolic response(s) to changing

environmental conditions.

4

Our goal was to apply biosensors to screen multiple glycolytic metabolites in

kinetoplastid parasites.15,22-26 If such biosensors could be analyzed together, a single assay could

be used to screen for inhibitors of more than one step of glycolysis. The combination of

biosensors would then provide a critical tactical advantage over a standard single metabolite

screening assay. In addition, since inhibitors of earlier steps of glycolysis affect glycolytic

downstream metabolic steps, the assay itself contains the opportunity for secondary hit

validation; molecules identified as hits of early stages of glycolysis could be validated by their

impact on downstream metabolites, including the end-product ATP.

FRET sensor utility in studies of multiple metabolites in a single in vivo application is

hampered by the significant spectral overlap between different FRET sensors, which has made

their combined use impossible. Fluorescence barcoding has previously been used to measure

multiple signals of different origins in a single sample simultaneously. 28 This barcoding

technique is performed by staining different cells with unique fluorescent dyes, mixing the

samples together before flow cytometry analysis, and running them as single samples. Notably,

the staining of different cell types allows separate analysis of cells containing different

biosensors and thus eliminates the problem of spectral overlap between different biosensors in

the same sample. Here we demonstrate the use of fluorescence barcoding to create a proof of

principle multiplexed screening assay to identify inhibitors of multiple steps of glycolysis. The

assay relies on measurements of glucose (the first metabolite used in glycolysis) and ATP, the

final product of glycolysis.

The protein biosensors used in the assay are FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 (FLIP700) and

AT1.03YEMK (YEMK). FLIP700 measures cytosolic glucose levels, while YEMK measures

cytosolic adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels. FLIP700 and YEMK were cloned into pXS6.Q

5

25,29,30 and transfected into BSF T. brucei. The glucose and ATP sensors used here contain no

signal (targeting) sequence and are therefore expressed in the cytosol.31,32

We used these two biosensors to design a screening assay that allows analysis of glucose

and ATP in the cytosol using a single flow cytometry assay. In short, fluorescent protein

biosensors that monitor important metabolites were genetically encoded and expressed in live T.

bruci BSF parasites. Biosensor-expressing parasites were labeled with desired concentrations of

one or two surface reactive dyes (cellular barcoding), then mixed into a single sample. A similar

barcoding approach27 has been used to obtain multiplexed measurements of enzymatic activity

with FRET biosensors. Here we report the first use of cellular barcoding to monitor changes in

intracellular metabolites and demonstrate its effectiveness when applied into a multiplexed

screening assay.

Using a model staining scheme, we show that four distinct populations could be

identified within a mixture. The concentrations of dye in this mixture have an insignificant effect

on parasite viability and do not diminish in brightness over time. Using these dyes, we

demonstrate that readout from two sensors can be monitored in a single assay. Moreover, we

show that cellular barcoding does not affect FRET biosensor response. In other words, whether a

transgenic parasite expressing a sensor is stained or unstained, the response of the biosensor to

changing extracellular conditions remains the same. Finally, we demonstrate that multiplexed

biosensors can be effectively used to simultaneously screen for inhibitors of multiple glycolytic

steps in a single assay. The resulting assay is proof of principle that a barcoding approach can be

used to eliminate problems associated with spectral overlap and, therefore, allow the creation of

a singel assay to analyze multiple metabolites.

6

RESULTS & DISCUSSION

A barcode staining scheme can distinguish four different parasite populations.

Cellular barcoding combined with the readout of multiple FRET biosensors via flow

cytometry should enable the simultaneous detection of multiple unique analytes in a single assay.

However, effective cellular barcoding requires selecting fluorescent barcoding dyes with

emission spectra that do not overlap with other barcoding dyes or with biosensor fluorescence.

We tested the feasibility of cellular barcoding using covalent cell-surface labels for different

biosensor-expressing cell populations, using multiple N-hydroxysuccinimidyl (NHS) protein

reactive dyes. Importantly, these dyes have minimal spectral overlap with the FRET biosensor

emission. We first tested whether multiple FRET biosensor-expressing populations could be

distinguished using the barcoding NHS-conjugated dyes, Sulfo-Cyanine 3 (Cy3) and Sulfo-

Cyanine 7 (Cy7). BSF wild-type T. brucei were stained with either no dye, Cy3, Cy7, or both

barcoding dyes. The dye combination was designed to create four different populations that

could be distinguished from each other by flow cytometry. Figure 1A shows each of the four

barcoded populations, run as separate samples and then combined into a single plot. These data

demonstrate that this staining scheme can achieve sufficient separation of the fluorescence

intensities to allow the individual analysis of four distinct populations. Indeed, when the

barcoded populations were combined into a single sample and then analyzed in a single flow

cytometry experiment, each labeled population was clearly distinguished from the other (Figure

1B).

7

These data, shown in Figure 1, show proof of principle separation of four different barcoded

populations in a single flow cytometry experiment, using two different dyes. However, more

populations could be created by adjusting the individual dye concentrations. For example, using

three intensity levels for each dye would allow nine different stained populations when analyzed

using flow cytometry.33,34 Therefore, we conclude that this staining scheme is an efficient model

that could be modified to match the desired number of analytes in a myriad of unique

experiments.

Biosensor response is unaffected by barcoding

FRET biosensors can be highly sensitive. If the barcoding itself alters either biosensor

response or cellular behavior, cellular barcoding could not be used. For example, covalent

attachment to surface receptors could impact the delivery of extracellular cargo to the cytosol

A B

Figure 1. Using Sulfo-Cyanine3 (Cy3) and Sulfo-Cyanine7 (Cy7) dyes, four distinguishable populations can be made. (A) Scatter plots of a four-population staining scheme using BF WT cells with each population run separately and (B) all combined and run simultaneously.

8

and alter the analyte concentrations the biosensors measure. In addition, the attachment of

fluorophores to the molecule of interest can potentially alter the molecular properties of the cell

surface receptors and may affect the relevant conformational states and dynamics of flexible

biomolecules like intrinsically disordered proteins (IDP).35 Depending on the size of the

molecule being studied, the fluorophores could also compete with extracellular ligands by

blocking key signals for nutritional intake.35 To minimize this effect, the concentration of the

dyes used for labeling was previously optimized.23-25,27

To ensure that our labeling methods did not alter either the biosensor response or

intracellular analyte levels, we compared the biosensor response in cells that were barcoded

differently. BSF cells expressing the cytosolic glucose sensor FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 (FLIP700)23-

25,27 cells were divided into four unique populations by cellular barcoding with Cy3 and Cy7

dyes. Specifically, one group was barcoded with Cy3 and Cy7, and the other groups barcoded

with either Cy3 or Cy7. The last group was not barcoded as a control. The four barcoded

populations were placed in increasing glucose concentrations, and the biosensor response of each

population was recorded by flow cytometric analysis. As shown in Figure 2, there was no

significant difference between each barcoded population and the unbarcoded control sample.

This result indicates that the glucose biosensor response is not influenced by the use of barcoding

dyes over the entire range of glucose concentrations tested, consistent with the conclusion that

barcoding dyes allow reliable measurements of the metabolites their barcoded signals represent.

9

Biosensor response is statistically significant

In a screening assay, it is necessary to distinguish between a positive result (inhibition of

the target) and the noise inherent in individual measurements. For example, a lower experimental

uncertainty and a greater separation between a positive and a negative results in a more powerful

screening assay. The Z' factor is the most commonly used statistical parameter to gauge assay

quality and track assay performance during a screening experiment. 36 A higher Z' value indicates

better screening assay performance because it separates positive and negative control

populations, which is necessary to distinguish actual inhibition from experimental noise.

Specifically, Z' values closer to 1 show a complete statistical separation between positive and

negative controls in an assay.36The advantage of a Z' analysis is its simplicity as it reduces the

Figure 3

Figure 2. Barcoding does not affect sensor response to differing concentrations of glucose. BSF cells expressing FLIP700 were divided into four unique populations by cellular barcoding with Cy3 and Cy7 dyes. The barcoded sample was placed in increasing concentrations of glucose, and the biosensor response of each population is shown overlapped with an unbarcoded sample control for comparison.

10

myriad of variables found within the signal assay to a single parameter.37 Because of its

suitability to interpret information-rich data sets in multiple parameters (i.e., barcoded

biosensors), the value of a Z' analysis in our multiplexed screening assay is pivotal to assessing

its feasibility.

Initially, a Z' experiment was performed separately for each biosensor. Using unbarcoded

BSF T. brucei cells expressing FLIP700, one sample was equally divided into two populations

and treated with either 0 mM or 7 mM extracellular glucose. The FLIP700 biosensor response

under each condition represented the physiological range of extracellular glucose concentrations

and were our positive and negative controls. Next, we performed an identical experiment using

the YEMK biosensor since the presence or absence of extracellular glucose would result in

depleted intracellular ATP. Specifically, unbarcoded BSF T. brucei cells expressing YEMK were

separated into two equal populations and treated with either 0 mM or 7 mM extracellular

glucose.

Figure 3 shows the results of these experiments. There was a unique and significant

difference between high and low glucose responses in each separate cell line. The FLIP700

(Figure 3A) had a Z' value of 0.81, while YEMK (Figure 3B) had a corresponding Z' value of

0.82. These Z’ values reflect a high dynamic range between controls and repeatability within

each population.

11

Multiplexed screening assay

Supported by the previous experiments, it was evident that a viable multiplex assay could

be performed using the combination of covalent dyes and biosensor-expressing cell lines

described above. BSF cells expressing FLIP700 were barcoded with Cy3.32,33 Similarly, BSF

cells expressing YEMK were barcoded with Cy7.32,33 Once barcoded, FLIP700 and YEMK

samples were combined and divided equally into two heterogeneous populations and treated with

either 0 mM glucose or 7 mM glucose as our high and low controls.

The uniquely treated heterogenous barcoded populations were separately loaded into the

same 384 well plate (Corning 384 Well Deep Well Plate). The low (0 mM glucose) control

population and the high (0.7 mM glucose) control multiplexed population each had (n=192)

samples distributed equally in the plate, adding up to 384 samples total. The plate was run

Figure 3. Plots representing FRET/CFP of high and low controls in BSF cells expressing the ATP biosensor in cytosol (1), or glucose biosensor in the cytosol (2). Plots show the ratio of ECFP/EYFP intensity emission (x-axis) and ECFP emission (y-axis) of BSF cells expressing pDR-GW AT1.03YEMK (YEMK) in cytosol (1) or FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 (FLIP700) in cytosol (2). High controls correspond to cells incubated in 7 mM extracellular glucose (1.C, 2.D), and low controls corresponds to cells incubated in 0 mM extracellular glucose (1.A, 2.B). Z-prime values for cytosol and cytosol assays are calculated as 0.81 and 0.82, respectively.

12

simultaneously, allowing for all barcoded biosensors to run as a single sample. The biosensor

response for each population was recorded by the flow cytometer. As depicted in Figure 4, there

was a significant difference between each barcoded population with a Z' for YEMK and

FLIP700 of 0.83 and 0.79, respectively. This suggests that a specific biosensor reflects the

concentration of its specific metabolite in the cellular location of the biosensor and can therefore

be used to measure metabolite concentration.

Figure 4. Plots representing FRET/ECFP emissions of combined (n: 384) C7 barcoded pDR-GW AT1.03YEMK (YEMK) (A, C), and Cy3 barcoded FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 (Flip700) (B, D). Plots show the ratio of ECFP/EYFP intensity emission (x-axis) and ECFP Intensity emission (y-axis) of BSF cells simultaneously expressing pDR-GW AT1.03YEMK (YEMK) in cytosol (A, C) or FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 in cytosol (B, D). High control (n=192) corresponds to cells incubated in 7 mM glucose (C, D), and low controls (n=192) corresponds to cells incubated in 0 mM glucose (A, B). Z-prime values for cytosolic ATP and cytosolic glucose assays are calculated as 0.83 and 0.79, respectively.

13

Drug assay supports multiplex biosensor efficiency

To demonstrate that multiplexed biosensors can be used to simultaneously screen for

inhibitors of multiple glycolytic steps in a single assay, we screened a small selection of

available anti-kinetoplastid drugs as well as reference anti-trypanosomal compounds.

We picked inhibitors that would specifically impact single targets or aspects of glycolysis

(i.e., ATP only or glucose only), except for 2-deoxyglucose (2-DOG), which due to its

biochemical composition influences both glucose levels and therefore ATP levels that result

from glucose metabolism.38 High concentrations of salicylhydrozamic acid (SHAM) + glycerol

are known to only affect ATP and NADH production; therefore, it should only lower ATP

signals in the YEMK biosensor while not impacting glucose metabolism or the signal of the

FLIP700 glucose bioscensor.39 6-deoxyglucose (6-DOG) was used to allosterically compete with

the regular intake of glucose into the cell. Because glucose transport across the plasma

membrane is likely to be the rate-limiting step of glucose utilization within metabolism40,

treatment with 6-DOG should lower glucose uptake while not affecting ATP production.

Therefore, treatment with 6-DOG should only lower the FLIP700 signal while not affecting

YEMK signals within the cell samples.

Each compound was tested in duplicate at 50 mM with 7 mM glucose and 0 mM glucose

used as controls. As shown in Figure 5, there was a significant difference in biosensor response

within the combined barcoded BSF cell populations. Compounds were initially scored as active

if they inhibited the FRET response at a minimum of three standard deviations below the average

of high (7 mM glucose) controls (Figure 5) in all replicates without altering BSF parasite

viability. Figure 5 also showed a significant and simultaneous response difference between the

controls and the treated samples. 2-deoxyglucose (2-DOG) reduced both glucose and ATP

14

concentration in the cytosol. Salicylhydrozamic acid (SHAM) + glycerol only reduced ATP

concentration in the cytosol. While 6-deoxyglucose (6-DOG) only reduced glucose concentration

in the cytosol. Since our biosensors are highly specific and only correspond to their assigned

metabolite, the findings described above indicate that our barcoded biosensor cell lines give

reliable and robust measurements of their metabolite when used simultaneously.

Figure 5. Bar graph representing FRET emission of combined Cy3 barcoded FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 (Flip700) in Blue and C7 barcoded pDR-GW AT1.03YEMK (YEMK) in Red. Bars show the ratio of ECFP/EYFP intensity emission (x-axis) and the treatment administered (y-axis). High control corresponds to cells incubated in 7 mM extracellular glucose; low control corresponds to cells incubated in 0 mM extracellular glucose. 50 mM of 2-deoxyglucose (2Dog) was administered to combined BSF C3/C7 barcoded cells in 0.7 mM extracellular glucose (High+2-Dog). 50 mM of combined Salicylhydroxaminc acid (SHAM) and 5 mM glycerol was administered to combined BSF C3/C7 barcoded cells in 0.7 mM extracellular glucose (High+SHAM+glycerol). 50 mM of 6-deoxyglucose (6-Dog) was administered to combined BSF C3/C7 barcoded cells in 0.7 mM extracellular glucose (High+6Dog).

15

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that multiple populations can be distinguished using two unique

barcoding dyes. With the selection and optimization of barcoding dyes, including the use of three

dyes rather than two, we hypothesize that the number of populations could be modified to fit a

large suite of FRET biosensors. We showed the method's robustness by demonstrating that

cellular barcoding has no effect on biosensor response and that the method appropriately models

single-cell analysis. We showed that barcoding can be used to simultaneously measure multiple

analytes in multiple locations, that each sensor responds sensitively and robustly to its respective

analyte, and that the method can highlight relationships between metabolically related analytes

(glucose and ATP). This approach could enable flow cytometric monitoring of multiple

metabolites in different cellular locations in a single experiment.

In the future, we propose that this method could be used for a variety of applications,

including high-throughput screening in T. brucei and other kinetoplast parasites. Additionally,

we anticipate that multiplexed measurements of important metabolic analytes will be crucial for

developing future drug therapies for kinetoplastid-caused diseases, such as trypanosomiasis,

leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease.

METHODS

Cells, Constructs, and Reagents

All experiments were performed using 427 BSF parasites. BSF cells were continuously

cultured in HMI9 media supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and 5% Corning Nu-Serum

IV. Cell culture media components, including the selection antibiotics (blasticidin, G418, and

16

hygromycin) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis.; MO). Cy3 and Cy7 NHS ester dyes were

purchased from Lumiprobe (Hunt Valley, Maryland). To control for the potential effects of

fluorescent media components, parasites were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (137 mM

NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4) for all experiments.

T. brucei transfection and localization of biosensors

The plasmids for the FRET biosensors, pRSET-FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 (FLIP700) and pDR-

GW AT1.03YEMK (YEMK), were obtained from Addgene (Addgene plasmids #13568 and

#28004 respectively).22,24,25 Each biosensor was cloned into the pXS6 expression vector using the

Q5 mutagenesis kit, restriction endonucleases, and other cloning reagents from New England

Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). The FLIP700 sensor was localized to the glycosomes by appending a C-

terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence using site-directed mutagenesis as described by Voyton

et al.22 Parasites were transfected and isolated as described by Wang et al.29

T. brucei culture

BSF cultures were counted via flow cytometry on a Beckman Coulter CytoFLEX flow

cytometer and diluted daily to a concentration of 2.0 X 105 cells/mL to maintain cell densities at

approximately 1.0 X 106 cells/mL for experimental use the following day. Parasites expressing a

FRET biosensor were grown in media containing blasticidin (5 µg/mL), hygromycin (5 µg/mL),

and G418 (1.5 µg/mL) antibiotics. WT cells were grown in media without antibiotics.

Sample preparation and flow cytometry

17

For flow cytometry experiments, cells were centrifuged at 1000 RCF for 10 minutes,

washed three times in PBS to remove media (centrifuging at 1000 RCF for 5 minutes in between

each wash) and stained at varying concentrations for a period of 30 minutes. After staining, cells

were washed two to four times before flow cytometric analysis. Experiments were performed on

a Thermo Fisher Scientific Attune NxT flow cytometer with a four-laser (405 nm, 488 nm, 561

nm, 638 nm) excitation configuration. Emissions due to YFP (530/30) and FRET (530/30) were

detected by excitation with the 488 nm and 405 nm lasers, respectively. Cy3 (585/42) and Cy7

(780/60) were excited with the 561 nm and 638 nm lasers. Gain settings for each fluorescent

channel were adjusted to minimize the robust coefficient of variation (rCV) for the signal in

each.

Flow cytometric data were analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR). For all

experiments, dead cells and doublets were excluded from analysis using forward scatter (FSC)

and side scatter (SSC) parameters (FSC-height vs. SSC-height and FSC-area vs. FSC-height,

respectively). For barcoding experiments, cells were then separated into distinct populations

according to their Cy3 and Cy7 fluorescence characteristics before analyzing biosensor response

in each population. Biosensor response was determined according to the ratio FRET/CFP.

Selection and optimization of barcoding dyes

Cy3 and Cy7 dyes were selected due to their fluorescence spectra that overlap minimally

with FRET biosensor spectra. Additionally, the high water-solubility of the sulfonated dyes

allows for more efficient washing after staining. Dye concentrations were determined empirically

by staining BSF cells with a 24-point 1:2 serial dilution of each dye. By comparing relative

fluorescence intensities at each point in the dose-response, concentrations were selected that

18

showed minimal (less than 5%) overlap between adjacent populations. The selected dyes were

then tested for effects on viability and sustained fluorescent intensity over a period of 3 hours to

determine whether the staining concentration of dye were toxic to parasites. Both Cy3 and Cy7

were shown to have a minimal effect on parasite viability (less than 5%) and negligible loss in

fluorescence intensity over the period tested. Graph created through Sigmaplot 11.0 (Systat

Software Inc.; San Jose, CA).

Testing parasite viability and population distinction of barcoded cells over time

Approximately 2-4 X 107 BSF WT cells were washed, stained with Cy3, Cy7, both, or

neither, washed, and combined as described above in "sample preparation and flow cytometry".

The barcoded cells were analyzed at 10-15 µL/min for 3 hours. To measure the effect of the dyes

on viability, the FSC-height histograms of 15-minute timepoints at the beginning and end of the

3-hour time course assay was compared. FSC was used to estimate live cells. Graph created

through Sigmaplot 11.0 (Systat Software Inc.; San Jose, CA).

Creating a Z-prime experiment and analyzing high and low glucose response over time

Approximately 2-4 X 107 BSF pRSET FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 or BSF AT1.03YEMK

(YEMK) cells were washed and prepared as described above in "sample preparation and flow

cytometry". Following final wash, equal amount of cells/µL were separately resuspended in

either PBS (0 mM glucose) or 7mM glucose and incubated in ambient condition for 35 mins

before being analyzed via flow cytometry as described above. FSC was used to estimate live

cells. 100 µL of the cell suspension (~20,000 cells per well) was pipetted into the wells; high

controls contained 7 mM glucose, and low controls contain no glucose. FSC was used to

19

estimate live cells. Graph created through Sigmaplot 11.0 (Systat Software Inc.; San Jose, CA).

The following equations was utilized to calculate the Z-prime:

3𝜎("#$%&$') = 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑓7𝑚𝑀"high"𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠

3𝜎()$*&#+,&) = 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑓0𝑚𝑀"low" samples

𝑍! = 1 −3𝜎(#$%&'%() + 3𝜎(*%+'$,-')|𝜇(#$%&'%() − 𝜇(*%+'$,-')|

𝜇(#$%&'%() = 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑓7𝑚𝑀"high" 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝜇(*%+'$,-') = 𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑓0𝑚𝑀"low"𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠

Running a barcoded multiplex screening assay

Approximately 3--6 X 107 BSF pRSET FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 and BSF AT1.03YEMK

(YEMK) cells were washed and separately prepared as described above in "sample preparation

and flow cytometry." Following final wash, equal amount of cells/µL were resuspended in PBS

and treated. BSF pRSET FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 was barcoded with C3 and BSF AT1.03YEMK was

barcoded with C7. Barcoded incubation was done at ambient conditions for 30 minutes.

Following barcoded incubation, each barcoded population was respectively quenched with 1%

BSA in PBS, washed at 1000 RCF for 5 minutes and recombined as one joined sample. 100 µL

of the cell suspension (~40,000 cells per well) was pipetted into the wells containing high control

(7mM glucose) or low control (0 mM glucose). After a 35-minute incubation, the barcoded cells

were analyzed at 10-15 µL/min for 2 hours. FSC was used to estimate live cells. Graph created

through Sigmaplot 11.0 (Systat Software Inc.; San Jose, CA).

Testing barcoded multiplexed screening assay with drug treatments with known impacts

20

Approximately 2-4 X 107 BSF pRSET FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 and BSF AT1.03YEMK cells

were washed and prepared as described above in "Running a barcoded multiplex assay." 100 µL

of the cell suspension (~40,000 cells per well) was pipetted into the wells containing the test

compounds to a final concentration of 50 mM in 0.7 mM glucose. Treatment administered

consisted of 3 replicates. 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose "2-Dog" (Cayman Chemical Company Inc.; Ann

Arbor, MI) was administered at 50 mM in mQH2O as solvent. 6-Deoxy-D-Glucose "6-Dog"

(Cayman Chemical Company Inc.; Ann Arbor, MI) was administered at 50 mM in mQH2O as

solvent. Salicylhydroxaminc acid "SHAM" (Sigma-Aldrich Inc.; St. Louis, MO) was

administered at 50 mM in 1% DMSO as solvent and combined with 5 mM glycerol (Sigma-

Aldrich Inc.; St. Louis, MO). Low control consisted of a starved (0 mM glucose) C3/C7

barcoded cell population; while high control consisted of a C3/C7 barcoded cell population re-

suspended in 0.7 mM glucose. FSC was used to estimate live cells. Graph created through

Sigmaplot 11.0 (Systat Software Inc.; San Jose, CA).

FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

pRSET FLII12Pglu-700μδ6 was a gift from Wolf Frommer (Addgene plasmid # 13568).

The plasmid was cloned into pXS6.Q by Charles Voyton.18,22-25 Transfection was done by the

Morris Lab (Clemson University.; Clemson, SC).

AT1.03YEMK (Addgene plasmid #28004) was purchased from Addgene. The plasmid

was cloned into pXS6.Q by Jacob Vance and Garrett Parker. Transfection was done by the

Morris Lab (Clemson University.; Clemson, SC).

21

Funding was provided by the NIH grant number R21AI105656 and in part by a NIH

Center for Biomedical Excellence (COBRE) grant under award number P20GM109094.

ABBREVIATIONS

T. brucei, Trypanosoma brucei; BSF, bloodstream form; T. brucei, Trypanosoma brucei;

MCF, metacyclic form; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; FRET, Förster resonance energy

transfer; WT, wild-type; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl; Cy3, Sulfo-Cyanine3; Cy7, Sulfo-

Cyanine7; FLIP700, FLII12Pglu-700μδ6; FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter.

REFERENCES

1. Sunyoto, T.; Boelaert, M.; Meheus, F. Understanding the economic impact of

leishmaniasis on households in endemic countries: a systematic review. Expert review of

anti-infective therapy 2019, 17, 57-69.

2. Bartsch, S. M.; Bottazzi, M. E.; Asti, L.; Strych, U.; Meymandi, S.; Falcón-Lezama, J.

A.; Randall, S.; Hotez, P. J.; Lee, B. Y. Economic value of a therapeutic Chagas vaccine

for indeterminate and Chagasic cardiomyopathy patients. Vaccine 2019, 37, 3704-3714

3. Bukachi, S. A.; Wandibba, S.; Nyamongo, I. K. The socio-economic burden of human

African trypanosomiasis and the coping strategies of households in the South Western

Kenya foci. PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2017, 11, e0006002.

22

4. Maria Laura, S.; Carolina Leticia, B.; Alan, T. Chapter 14 - The Challenge of Finding

New Therapies for Sleeping Sickness; The Microbiology of Central Nervous System

Infections; Elsevier Inc, 2018; pp 279–303.

5. J. Stein; S. Mogk; C.N. Mudogo; B.P. Sommer; M. Scholze; A. Meiwes; M. Huber; A.

Gray; M. Duszenko Drug Development Against Sleeping Sickness: Old Wine in New

Bottles? Current medicinal chemistry 2014, 21, 1713-1727.

6. Joice, A. C.; Harris, M. T.; Kahney, E. W.; Dodson, H. C.; Maselli, A. G.; Whitehead, D.

C.; Morris, J. C. Exploring the mode of action of ebselen in Trypanosoma brucei

hexokinase inhibition. International journal for parasitology -- drugs and drug

resistance 2013, 3, 154-160.

7. Stuart, K.; Brun, R.; Croft, S.; Fairlamb, A.; Gürtler, R. E.; McKerrow, J.; Reed, S.;

Tarleton, R. Kinetoplastids: Related Protozoan Pathogens, Different

Diseases. 2008, 118 (4), 1301–1310.

8. Anonymous kinetoplast; Oxford University Press: 2020.

9. HIDE, G. History of Sleeping Sickness in East Africa. Clinical Microbiology

Reviews 1999, 12, 112-125.

10. Vonlaufen, N.; Kanzok, S. M.; Wek, R. C.; Sullivan Jr, W. J. Stress response pathways in

protozoan parasites. Cellular microbiology 2008, 10, 2387-2399.

11. Tielens, A. G. M.; Van Hellemond, J. J., Differences in energy metabolism between

trypanosomatidae. Parasitol. Today 1998, 14 (7), 265-271.

12. Bringaud, F.; Rivière, L.; Coustou, V. Energy Metabolism of Trypanosomatids:

Adaptation to Available Carbon Sources. 2006, 149 (1), 1–9.

23

13. Ooi, C.; Bastin, P. More than meets the eye: understanding Trypanosoma brucei

morphology in the tsetse. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology 2013, 3, 71.

14. Langford, C. K.; Burchmore, R. J. S.; Hart, D. T.; Wagner, W.; Landfear, S. M.

Biochemistry and molecular genetics of Leishmania glucose transporters. Parasitology

1994, 108, S73-S83.

15. Gordhan, H. M.; Milanes, J. E.; Qiu, Y.; Golden, J. E.; Christensen, K. A.; Morris, J. C.;

Whitehead, D. C. A targeted delivery strategy for the development of potent

trypanocides. Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) 2017, 53, 8735-8738.

16. Louassini; M. Foulquié; R. Benítez; J. Adroher Citric-Acid Cycle Key Enzyme Activities

during In vitro Growth and Metacyclogenesis of Leishmania infantum Promastigotes.

The Journal of parasitology 1999, 85, 595-602.

17. Akhoundi, M.; Kuhls, K.; Cannet, A.; Votýpka, J.; Marty, P.; Delaunay, P.; Sereno, D. A

Historical Overview of the Classification, Evolution, and Dispersion of Leishmania

Parasites and Sandflies. 2016, 10 (3), e0004349.

18. P. A. M.; Pettit, S.; Walkinshaw, M. D. Fast acting allosteric phosphofructokinase

inhibitors block trypa-nosome glycolysis and cure acute African trypanosomiasis in mice.

Nature Communications 2021, 12, 1-10

19. CREEK, D. J.; NIJAGAL, B.; KIM, D.; ROJAS, F.; MATTHEWS, K. R.; BARRETT,

M. P. Metabolomics Guides Rational Development of a Simplified Cell Culture Medium

for Drug Screening against Trypanosoma brucei. Antimicrobial Agents and

Chemotherapy 2013, 57, 2768-2779.

20. Darren J Creek; Muriel Mazet; Fiona Achcar; Jana Anderson; Dong-Hyun Kim; Ruwida

Kamour; Pauline Morand; Yoann Millerioux; Marc Biran; Eduard J Kerkhoven;

24

Achuthanunni Chokkathukalam; Stefan K Weidt; Karl E V Burgess; Rainer Breitling;

David G Watson; Frédéric Bringaud; Michael P Barrett Probing the Metabolic Network

in Bloodstream-Form Trypanosoma brucei Using Untargeted Metabolomics with Stable

Isotope Labelled Glucose. PLoS pathogens 2015, 11.

21. Hennig, K.; Abi-Ghanem, J.; Bunescu, A.; Meniche, X.; Biliaut, E.; Ouattara, A.; Lewis,

M.; Kelly, J.; Braillard, S.; Courtemanche, G.; Chatelain, E.; Béquet, F. Metabolomics,

lipidomics and proteomics profiling of myoblasts infected with Trypanosoma cruzi after

treatment with different drugs against Chagas disease. Metabolomics 2019, 15, 1-12.

22. Voyton, C. M.; Choi, J.; Qiu, Y.; Morris, M. T.; Ackroyd, P. C.; Morris, J. C.;

Christensen, K. A. A Microfluidic-Based Microscopy Platform for Continuous

Interrogation of Trypanosoma brucei during Environmental Perturbation. Biochemistry

(Easton) 2019, 58, 875-882.

23. Lin, S.; Morris, M. T.; Ackroyd, P. C.; Morris, J. C.; Christensen, K. A. Peptide-Targeted

Delivery of a pH Sensor for Quantitative Measurements of Intraglycosomal pH in Live

Trypanosoma brucei. Biochemistry (Easton) 2013, 52, 3629-3637.

24. Lin, S.; Voyton, C.; Morris, M. T.; Ackroyd, P. C.; Morris, J. C.; Christensen, K. A. pH

regulation in glycosomes of procyclic form Trypanosoma brucei. The Journal of

biological chemistry 2017, 292, 7795-7805.

25. Voyton, C. M.; Qiu, Y.; Morris, M. T.; Ackroyd, P. C.; Suryadi, J.; Crowe, L.; Morris, J.

C.; Christensen, K. A. A FRET flow cytometry method for monitoring cytosolic and

glycosomal glucose in living kinetoplastid parasites. PLoS neglected tropical

diseases 2018, 12, e0006523.

25

26. Lin, S.; Morris, M. T.; Ackroyd, P. C.; Morris, J. C.; Christensen, K. A. Peptide-Targeted

Delivery of a pH Sensor for Quantitative Measurements of Intraglycosomal pH in Live

Trypanosoma brucei. Biochemistry (Easton) 2013, 52, 3629-3637.

27. Voyton, C. M.; Morris, M. T.; Ackroyd, P. C.; Morris, J. C.; Christensen, K. A., FRET

Flow Cytometry-Based High Throughput Screening Assay To Identify Disrupters of

Glucose Levels in Trypanosoma brucei. ACS Infect. Dis. 2018, 4 (7), 1058-1066.

28. Doucette, J.; Zhao, Z. Y.; Geyer, R. J.; Barra, M. M.; Balunas, M. J.; Zweifach, A.,

Flow Cytometry Enables Multiplexed Measurements of Genetically Encoded

Intramolecular FRET Sensors Suitable for Screening. J. Biomol. Screen 2016, 21 (6),

535-547.

29. Wang, Z.; Morris, J. C.; Drew, M. E.; Englund, P. T. Inhibition of Trypanosoma brucei

Gene Expression by RNA Interference Using an Integratable Vector with Opposing T7

Promoters. The Journal of biological chemistry 2000, 275, 40174-40179.

30. Burkard, G.; Fragoso, C. M.; Roditi, I. Highly efficient stable transformation of

bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei. Molecular and biochemical

parasitology 2007, 153, 220-223.

31. Hiromi Imamura; Kim P. Huynh Nhat; Hiroko Togawa; Kenta Saito; Ryota Iino;

Yasuyuki Kato-Yamada; Takeharu Nagai; Hiroyuki Noji; James A. Wells Visualization

of ATP Levels inside Single Living Cells with Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer-

Based Genetically Encoded Indicators. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

- PNAS 2009, 106, 15651-15656.

26

32. Bermejo, C.; Haerizadeh, F.; Takanaga, H.; Chermak, D.; Frommer, W. B., Dynamic

analysis of cytosolic glucose and ATP levels in yeast using optical sensors. Biochem.

J. 2010, 432, 399-406.

33. Nolan, G. P.; Krutzik, P. O. Fluorescent cell barcoding in flow cytometry allows high-

throughput drug screening and signaling profiling. Nature methods 2006, 3, 361-368.

34. Krutzik, P. O.; Clutter, M. R.; Trejo, A.; Nolan, G. P. Fluorescent Cell Barcoding for

Multiplex Flow Cytometry. Current Protocols in Cytometry 2011, 55, 6.31.1-6.31.15.

35. Luitz, M. P.; Barth, A.; Crevenna, A. H.; Bomblies, R.; Lamb, D. C.; Zacharias, M.

Covalent dye attachment influences the dynamics and conformational properties of

flexible peptides. PloS one 2017, 12, e0177139.

36. Zhang, J.; Chung, T. D. Y.; Oldenburg, K. R. A Simple Statistical Parameter for Use in

Evaluation and Validation of High Throughput Screening Assays. Journal of

biomolecular screening 1999, 4, 67-73.

37. Iversen, P. W.; Eastwood, B. J.; Sittampalam, G. S.; Cox, K. L. A Comparison of Assay

Performance Measures in Screening Assays: Signal Window, Z' Factor, and Assay

Variability Ratio. Journal of biomolecular screening 2006, 11, 247-252.

38. Pajak, B.; Siwiak, E.; Sołtyka, M.; Priebe, A.; Zieliński, R.; Fokt, I.; Ziemniak, M.;

Jaśkiewicz, A.; Borowski, R.; Domoradzki, T.; Priebe, W. 2-Deoxy-d-Glucose and Its

Analogs: From Diagnostic to Therapeutic Agents. International journal of molecular

sciences 2019, 21, 234.

39. Clarkson, A. B.; Grady, R. W.; Grossman, S. A.; McCallum, R. J.; Brohn, F. H.

Trypanosoma brucei brucei: A systematic screening for alternatives to the

27

salicylhydroxamic acid-glycerol combination. Molecular and biochemical

parasitology 1981, 3, 271-291.

40. Eisenthal, R.; Game, S.; Holman, G. D. Specificity and kinetics of hexose transport in

Trypanosoma brucei. Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes 1989, 985, 81-89.