A comparison of NO x adsorption on Na, H and BaZSM-5 films
-
Upload
ubrawijaya -
Category
Documents
-
view
5 -
download
0
Transcript of A comparison of NO x adsorption on Na, H and BaZSM-5 films
www.elsevier.com/locate/apcatb
Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–91
A comparison of NOx adsorption on Na, H and BaZSM-5 films
Indra Perdana a,1, Derek Creaser a,*, Olov Ohrman b,2, Jonas Hedlund b
a Department of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Swedenb Division of Chemical Technology, Lulea University of Technology, SE-971 87, Lulea, Sweden
Received 9 May 2006; received in revised form 22 September 2006; accepted 30 September 2006
Available online 21 November 2006
Abstract
NOx adsorption in ZSM-5 films containing Na+, H+ or Ba2+ as counter ions was studied. NaZSM-5 films showed a superior NOx adsorption
capacity over the entire temperature range (30–350 8C) in comparison with the other films. Besides the possibility to form strongly bound surface
nitrate species, the presence of the Na+ ions in ZSM-5 resulted in a large enhancement of various weakly adsorbed species. In the HZSM-5 film, the
NOx adsorption was mainly due to physisorption, surface nitric acid and nitrosium ion (NO+) formation. Besides weakly adsorbed species and
surface nitric acid, the NOx adsorption in BaZSM-5 films also resulted in formation of strongly bound surface nitrate species. The nitrate species in
the BaZSM-5 film were found to be resistant to NO exposure and were mainly formed through an NO2 disproportionation pathway.
# 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: NOx adsorption; Monolith; ZSM-5 films; Counter ions
1. Introduction
Stringent regulations on emissions from combustion
processes have triggered substantial development in exhaust
gas after-treatment systems, in particular for operation under
lean combustion conditions at which NOx reduction is
problematic. Among several available methods, techniques
based on NOx adsorption materials [1] are among the most
promising ones for NOx abatement. Besides basic oxides,
zeolites have also been considered as NOx adsorbents [2–4] due
to their thermal stability and well-defined microporous
structures with high surface area.
NOx adsorption has been studied experimentally on a variety
of zeolite types with different counter ions [4–11]. The
formation of surface adsorbed species has been most frequently
investigated with in situ infrared (IR) spectroscopy. Depending
on the nature of the zeolite, various adsorbed species may exist.
In most cases, the presence of a metal counter ion in the zeolite
has been found to lead to the formation of surface nitrate
species after NOx exposure [2,5,6,11–13]. In addition, other
* Corresponding author. Fax: +46 31 7723035.
E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Creaser).1 On leave from Department of Chemical Engineering, Gadjah Mada Uni-
versity, Indonesia.2 Present address: Haldor Topsøe A/S, R&D, Denmark.
0926-3373/$ – see front matter # 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.09.016
surface species can also be present due to interactions with
surface hydroxyl groups [8–10,13].
To study NOx adsorption and desorption, zeolite powders
[2–4,10,14] or zeolite washcoats on cordierite monoliths
containing binder materials [7,15] have been used. With the
use of zeolite powders, it can however be difficult to obtain an
evenly distributed flow of the adsorbate containing gas through
the powder bed without an excessive pressure drop. As a result
the zeolite supported on a structured monolith support as a
washcoat can be experimentally more practical. Although the
reported results from zeolite washcoat studies are relevant for
catalyst development, the adsorption and transport properties
may be influenced by the type and quantity of binder material
used in the washcoat. A direct adsorption study using a film of
intergrown zeolite crystals free of binder material can provide a
more definitive understanding of the NOx adsorption and
transport properties in the zeolite. In addition, zeolite films are
also interesting materials due to their many unique potential
applications, such as for sensors and membranes [16–20].
Recently, techniques for coating monoliths and other structured
support materials with binder-free MFI type zeolite films
[17,21,22] have been reported and the films were found to be
catalytically active [22–25].
NOx adsorption–desorption in a binder-free NaZSM-5 film
grown on a cordierite monolith has been reported [13,23] and it
was shown that various adsorbed species were present over a
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–91 83
wide temperature range [13]. The results also indicated that
mass transport resistance in the films was an important factor
during transient NOx adsorption–desorption processes.
The affinity of ZSM-5 films in NOx adsorption is strongly
dependent on the structure and surface chemistry. Hence, the
presence of different counter ions in the ZSM-5 films is
expected to have a significant impact on the NOx adsorption–
desorption properties. The present work is therefore aimed at
studying the differences in observed surface species with H+
and Ba2+ counter ions compared to those previously reported
with Na+ [13] during NOx adsorption in ZSM-5 films supported
on cordierite monoliths. The NOx adsorption was studied by
temperature programmed desorption (TPD) and in situ DRIFT
spectroscopy.
2. Experimental
2.1. Sample preparation and characterization
In the present work, three types (NaZSM-5, HZSM-5 and
BaZSM-5) of film and powder samples were prepared. The film
samples were used for NOx adsorption experiments in a gas
flow reactor, whereas the powder samples were used for in situ
DRIFT spectroscopy measurements.
To prepare film samples, cordierite monoliths (approxi-
mately 100 mm in length) with a cross-section containing 188
channels (channel dimension 1 mm � 1 mm) were used as
supports. A detailed description of the sample preparation
procedure has been reported elsewhere [22]. The monoliths
were seeded with 60 nm silicalite-1 seeds [26,27] and
hydrothermally treated 12 times in a synthesis solution at
75 8C for 48 h in each step. The synthesis solution had a molar
composition of 3TPAOH:25SiO2:0.25Al2O3:1Na2O:1600
H2O:100EtOH. Following each hydrothermal treatment, the
samples were rinsed in an aqueous ammonia solution and were
treated with ultrasound in order to remove bulk crystals on top
of the film surface. After the final hydrothermal treatment, the
coated monoliths were polished on each side to a length of
75 mm. In addition, ZSM-5 powder samples were prepared in
an identical synthesis solution as used for film growth by
hydrothermal treatment for 72 h at 100 8C in the absence of
support and silicalite-1 seeds [22]. Finally, template molecules
in the monolith and powder samples were removed by
calcination at 550 8C. The samples were heated from room
temperature to 550 8C with a heating rate of 1.75 8C min�1 and
the temperature was kept constant at 550 8C for 6 h. Finally, the
samples were cooled down to room temperature at a cooling
rate of 1.75 8C min�1.
To prepare HZSM-5 samples, the NaZSM-5 samples were
ion-exchanged following a procedure reported elsewhere [24].
The samples were treated in a 10 wt.% NH4NO3 solution at
100 8C in a container equipped with a reflux condenser for 1 h
and were rinsed in deionized water for 1 h. The exchange was
carried out three times followed by a single calcination
treatment. The samples were heated from room temperature to
400 8C with a heating rate of 0.2 8C min�1 and the temperature
was kept constant at 400 8C for 24 h. Then, the temperature was
slowly decreased to room temperature with a cooling rate of
0.5 8C min�1.
To prepare BaZSM-5 samples, the NaZSM-5 film and
powder samples were ion-exchanged in a 2 wt.% Ba(NO3)2
solution in a container equipped with a reflux condenser at
80 8C for 2 h. To remove excess Ba(NO3)2 from the samples,
the film samples were treated in deionized water three times for
2 h each. The powder samples were rinsed with deionized water
in a stirred container three times for 2 h each. Following the
rinsing, the samples were calcined at 550 8C. The samples were
heated from room temperature to 550 8C with a heating rate of
1.8 8C min�1. After keeping the temperature constant at 550 8Cfor 1 h, the temperature was decreased to room temperature
with a cooling rate of 1.8 8C min�1. The ion-exchange and
calcination procedure was repeated three times.
Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy
(ICP-AES, Analytica AB, Sweden) was used to determine the
elemental composition of the powders. The exchange level in
the zeolite was expressed as a ratio of the amount of exchanged
atom to aluminium atom.
The zeolite loading (gzeolite/gsample) on the monolith samples
was determined by N2 gas adsorption measurements (BET
measurement). The surface area of the cordierite support was
negligible compared to the total surface area of the film sample.
With a knowledge of the specific surface area (415 m2/g [28])
for the ZSM-5 powder, the ZSM-5 loading in the film samples
could be calculated from the following equation [29]:
Zeolite loading ðgsample=gzeoliteÞ
¼measured BET area of ZSM-5 coated sample ½m2=gsample�
specific surface area of synthesized ZSM-5 powder ½m2=gzeolite�(1)
However, during film synthesis bulk crystals were found to
deposit on top of the film [22] in particular at the ends of the
monoliths. In order to remove as much sedimented crystals on
the film surface as possible the samples were treated with
ultrasound after each step [22]. To minimize the amount of
sediments at the monolith ends (top and bottom), the monoliths
were polished a few millimeters at both ends after the final
synthesis step [22]. Therefore, the measured weight difference
before and after synthesis cannot be used to estimate the zeolite
loading of the samples that were tested later on. Details about
the application of this technique for measurements of zeolite
loading on support materials are reported elsewhere [25,28–
30].
2.2. NOx adsorption–desorption measurements
NOx adsorption measurements with monolith samples were
performed in a gas flow reactor. As described in our previous
report [13], the reactor was a horizontal quartz glass tube with a
length of 880 mm and a diameter of 22 mm. The gas
temperature in the reactor was regulated with a temperature
controller connected to an electrical heater and thermocouples.
The monolith samples were placed inside the reactor and were
pre-treated with 8% O2 in argon at 500 8C for 15 min with
a total flow rate of 3000 ml min�1 (STP). Following the
Fig. 1. Top view of HZSM-5 film (a) and side view of HZSM-5 (b).
Table 1
Results from ICP-AES elemental and BET surface area measurements
Before cation
exchange
(mg/kg)a
After cation
exchange
(mg/kg)a
BET surface
area
(m2/gsample)b
Zeolite loading
(gzeolite/gsample)b
NaZSM-5
Si 414,000 – 58.1 0.14
Al 6,240 –
Na 6,000 –
HZSM-5
Si 428,000 447,000 58.6 0.14
Al 5,520 5,280
Na 5,210 <100
BaZSM-5
Si 414,000 427,000 74.7 0.18
Al 6,240 6,090
Na 6,000 813
Ba – 11,800
a Measurements on powder samples synthesized with similar synthesis
procedure as that for monolith film sample preparation.b Measurements on monolith samples with zeolite films.
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–9184
pre-treatment, the samples were cooled down to the specific
adsorption temperature which varied from 30 to 350 8C.
For NO2 adsorption experiments, a gas mixture containing
600 ppm NO2 in argon with a total flow rate of 2600 ml min�1
(STP) was exposed to the samples. The gas mixture was
prepared in a gas mixer (Environics 2000) consisting of several
mass flow controllers. Following the adsorption, the samples
were flushed with argon (inert gas) at the adsorption
temperature. To release adsorbed species, temperature pro-
grammed desorption (TPD) was carried out. The TPD consisted
of heating from the adsorption temperature to 550 8C with a
temperature ramp of 20 8C min�1 in a steady stream of pure
argon. In some experiments, the effect of an NO containing
atmosphere on the adsorbed species was further investigated by
exposing a sample that first had been equilibrated with NO2 to a
stream of 600 ppm NO in argon. During adsorption and
desorption, the outlet gas composition was analyzed online
using a chemiluminesence detector (Ecophysics CLD 700 EL
ht). The amount of adsorbed/desorbed NOx was quantified from
the area under the corresponding concentration curves of
adsorption, flushing and TPD.
The adsorbed species during NO2 adsorption was further
investigated for powders using in situ DRIFT spectroscopy (Bio
Rad FTS 6000 spectrometer). As reported previously [13], the
zeolite powders were placed in a sample holder assembly in a
Harrick Praying Mantis DRIFT cell. The gases were supplied
by individual mass flow controllers with a total flow rate of
200 ml min�1 (STP). The samples were pre-treated with 8% O2
in argon at 500 8C for 15 min. The adsorption experiments were
performed by introducing 600 ppm NO2 in argon followed by
argon flushing. Finally, to release the adsorbed species from the
samples, the temperature was increased to 500 8C with a ramp
of 20 8C min�1 and was then kept constant for about 20 min.
The spectra recorded were the average of 100 scans with a
resolution of 2 cm�1 with a background in an argon
atmosphere.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization by electron microscopy, N2
adsorption and ICP-AES
Details about synthesized ZSM-5 film properties have
been reported previously [13]. Following the repeated
hydrothermal treatments, the ZSM-5 films reached a
thickness of approximately 1700 nm thick. Scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) images taken after cation exchange and
high temperature treatment during experiments showed that
the exchange and temperature treatment did not deteriorate
the ZSM-5 films on the monolith surfaces. Instead, as visible
in Fig. 1, SEM images from the HZSM-5 sample shows a
homogeneous polycrystalline ZSM-5 film covering the entire
cordierite monolith surface. The images are very similar to
those recorded from NaZSM-5 films [13] and Ba exchanged
ZSM-5 films.
Table 1 contains the results of the ICP-AES measurements.
Based on these results for the powder samples, treated with
the identical method as that for the film samples, the ion-
exchange methods used in this present work could reach a
cation-exchange capacity of >98% and about 86% for H
and Ba exchanged ZSM-5, respectively. The degree of ion-
Fig. 3. The amount and distribution of adsorbed species at varying tempera-
tures after exposure to 600 ppm NO2 over NaZSM-5, BaZSM-5 and HZSM-5
monolith samples.
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–91 85
exchange was calculated on the assumption that one proton is
exchanged for one cationic sodium and one cationic Ba for two
sodium ions. The ICP-AES measurements on the synthesized
powder samples showed that the ZSM-5 had a Si/Al molar ratio
of about 64 and an Al/Na molar ratio of about 0.9, indicating
that they were pre-dominately NaZSM-5 [13]. Since the
powder and film samples were prepared in an identical
synthesis solution, it is here assumed that the Si/Al and Al/Na
molar ratios of the films are similar to those of the powder
samples. In another ongoing study, we are investigating the
exact elemental composition in thin ZSM-5 films, for example,
to elucidate if Al gradients are present and the results will be
reported elsewhere.
In addition, the results in Table 1 indicate that the ion-
exchange treatments did not significantly change the zeolite
loading of the original NaZSM-5 film. Also, the BET surface
area calculated from the N2 adsoption measurements was
similar for the monolith samples with HZSM-5 and NaZSM-5
films, but somewhat larger for the BaZSM-5 sample.
3.2. NOx adsorption capacity
To study NOx adsorption in ZSM-5 films, monolith samples
were exposed and equilibrated in a stream of 600 ppm NO2 in
argon. Following the equilibration with NO2, the samples were
flushed with argon (inert gas) and were heated (TPD treatment)
to desorb or decompose the adsorbed compounds. Fig. 2 shows
an example of the outlet NOx concentration profile during such
a sequence for the BaZSM-5 film sample. Besides the
breakthrough of NO2, NO was also formed during the NO2
adsorption over the BaZSM-5 film. Similar behaviours were
also observed for HZSM-5 and NaZSM-5 films. Fig. 3 is a
stacked bar diagram showing the quantities and distribution of
NOx compounds involved in the aforementioned treatments
following NO2 adsorption on NaZSM-5, HZSM-5 and BaZSM-
5 film samples. In the present report, results for the NaZSM-5
film are partly taken from our previous work [13].
Fig. 2. Measured NOx composition out of the reactor for BaZSM-5 film
exposed to 600 ppm NO2 for 60 min at 30 8C followed by a 30 min argon
flush, 30 min NO2 re-adsorption, 30 min argon flush at constant temperature and
finally a temperature ramp of 20 8C min�1.
An inert gas flushing, following NO2 equilibration always
results in desorption of adsorbed NOx mostly NO2. Fig. 3 shows
that the desorption is significant at low adsorption temperatures,
but the amount becomes negligible at adsorption temperatures
above 200 8C. The NOx desorption during inert gas flushing is
due to the release of physisorbed species. However, it should be
noted that due to mass transport limitation in the ZSM-5 films,
the inert gas flushing may not completely remove the
physisorbed species, particularly at low temperatures.
A temperature increase during TPD following the sequence
of NO2 adsorption and inert gas flushing results in another
desorption or decomposition of NOx adsorbed species. As seen
in Fig. 3, the quantity of NOx desorbed during TPD following
the adsorption at low temperatures is large and the amount
decreases as the adsorption temperature increases. However, at
high adsorption temperatures, the amount of the desorbed NOx
during TPD makes up a larger portion of the total amount of
NOx desorbed during TPD and flushing. This indicates that the
NOx desorption due to the temperature increase results from
the decomposition of chemisorbed species formed in the ZSM-
5 films during the NO2 adsorption. Depending on the
adsorption temperature, the chemisorbed species might
comprise various adsorbed species which differ in thermal
stability.
As clearly shown in Fig. 3, it was found that exchanging
cationic Na in ZSM-5 films with either H+ or Ba2+ cations
results in a significant reduction in the adsorption capacity.
The ion-exchange causes a decrease in the quantity of species
removed by argon flushing and it also significantly lowers the
amount of NOx later released during TPD. This relationship
indicates that the quantity of the physisorbed species in the
ZSM-5 films may be partly dependent on the quantity of
the chemisorbed species. The chemisorbed species formed
might play a role as active sites for further NO2 adsorption but
with weaker interactions. This kind of adsorption effect
results in an additional capacity for physisorption in the ZSM-
5 films.
As mentioned previously, NO is a byproduct during
exposure of the ZSM-5 films to NO2 at the adsorption
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–9186
temperatures studied. As seen in Fig. 3, the amount of NO
produced during NO2 adsorption in the NaZSM-5 film
decreases very little with increasing adsorption temperature.
However, the amount of byproduct NO with HZSM-5 and
BaZSM-5 films appears to decrease more with temperature,
becoming almost immeasurable above 200 8C. As reported
previously [13], the NO production is related to the formation
of surface nitric acid in the presence of residual water [2,6], by
the following reaction:
3NO2þH2O @ 2HNO3þNO: (2)
This reaction may also occur through the steps of NO2
disproportionation and in turn the interaction of the NO+
surface intermediate with residual water.
2NO2 @ NOþ þNO3�: (3)
H2O þ 2NOþ @ 2Hþ þNO2þNO: (4)
In the case of the NaZSM-5 film, the amount of byproduct
NO is still significant during NO2 adsorption even at 350 8C.
The NO production is thus related to the formation of thermally
stable nitrate species on metal sites through surface nitric acid
[2,3,6], by the following reaction:
nðHþNO3�Þ þ Mnþ�ðZeo�O�Þn @ MnþðNO3
�Þnþ nðZeo�O��HþÞ (5)
where M is a metal cation and n is its charge. However, it seems
that the development of NO in HZSM-5 and BaZSM-5 films is
not or at least less associated with the formation of the nitrate
species, but due to the formation of surface nitric acid (reaction
(2) above) which is less thermally stable compared to the nitrate
species.
As mentioned previously, the appearance of NO during NO2
adsorption in the ZSM-5 films is evidence for the presence of
residual water in the samples. The presence of counter ion
alkali or alkaline earth metals in the ZSM-5 can enhance the
adsorption affinity for water [31–33]. It is known to be difficult
to completely remove water from zeolites by heating under a
non-vacuum system [6]. During NO2 exposure, the residual
water can immediately react to form surface nitric acid [2,6]
which can in turn enhance the adsorption capacity by adsorbing
other NOx containing species via hydrogen bonds [13]. The
nitric acid formed can further interact either with NO2 or other
nitric acid molecules [34]. However, compared to the Ba2+
cation, Na+ is smaller in size and stronger in polarizing power.
In addition, as mentioned earlier, ICP-AES measurements of
the ZSM-5 powder samples show that the ZSM-5 have a Si/Al
molar ratio of about 64 which is considered to be high [35] and
the value is expected to be similar for the film samples. ZSM-5
with such as Si/Al molar ratio should contain only one to two
alumina sites per unit cell. For that reason, Ba2+ is more poorly
anchored in the ZSM-5 framework. Thus, at the same
temperature the amount of residual water in BaZSM-5 might
be less than that in NaZSM-5. As a result, less surface nitric
acid can be formed in the BaZSM-5 film leading to a low
adsorption capacity of the BaZSM-5 film for other weakly
adsorbed NOx species. Another possible reason for the low
adsorption capacity of the BaZSM-5 film at low temperatures is
that the stable nitrate species formed on the Ba sites may, due to
their large dimension, hinder other NOx molecules to be
adsorbed in the interior of the ZSM-5 films.
In comparison with the HZSM-5 film, the adsorption
capacity of the BaZSM-5 film at 350 8C is higher (not clearly
evident in Fig. 3). Due to the absence of alkali or alkaline earth
metal, it is obvious that there is no possibility to form nitrate
species in the HZSM-5 film. On the other hand, the presence of
Ba2+ ions in the ZSM-5 should promote the formation of stable
nitrate species from NO2 exposure. However, as shown by
Fig. 3, the quantity of these nitrate species should be much less
in comparison with those in the NaZSM-5 film. According to
ICP-AES element analysis of the powder ZSM-5 samples
prepared in a similar way to the film sample preparation, about
86% of the Na+ in the synthesized sample can be exchanged
with Ba2+ by the ion-exchange method used in the present
work. Since the ZSM-5 used in the present work has a low Al
content, it might lead to heterogeneous Brønsted sites [36]. The
catonic Ba would be likely to situate in a unit cell with two
aluminum sites or in between two adjacent unit cells having
only one aluminum site each. Depending on the position and
distance between the aluminum sites, it might cause Ba2+
cations to be unevenly distributed in the ZSM-5 framework.
3.3. Adsorbed species and their stability in ZSM-5 films
In the following section, the formation of adsorbed species
in the ZSM-5 films following NO2 adsorption is discussed in
more detail. The adsorbed species are classified with respect to
their thermal stability by NOx-TPD. Since the adsorbed species
can differ in thermal stability, a temperature increase during
TPD following a sequence of NO2 equilibration and inert gas
flushing over the ZSM-5 film samples can develop a specific
NOx concentration profile. Fig. 4 shows concentration profiles
of NOx desorption at the reactor outlet as a result of temperature
increase following NO2 equilibration and inert gas flushing at
various adsorption temperatures for the different ZSM-5 films.
NO concentrations were negligible throughout the desorption
period and thus are not depicted in the figure. In addition to
NOx-TPD observations, in situ DRIFT spectroscopy measure-
ment results from powder samples of the ZSM-5 are also
discussed.
Also, it is possible to estimate the heat of adsorption from the
TPD concentration profile [37]. Our calculation method is
similar to that used for powder samples [38]. The flow in the
channels was modeled to follow a one-dimensional single
channel model [39]. The desorption was from a monolayer of a
single adsorbed species with negligible re-adsorption and a
negligible activation energy for adsorption. The actual TPD
following NO2 adsorption resulted in a multi-peak desorption,
indicating the presence of various adsorbed species and thus it
was difficult to determine the initial condition of the model for
the desorption of each adsorbed species. Therefore, the heat of
adsorption was estimated only for the adsorbed species easily
removed early during TPD following NO2 equilibration and
Fig. 4. NOx concentration profiles during TPD after NO2 equilibration and
argon flushing on NaZSM-5 (a), HZSM-5 (b) and BaZSM-5 (c) at various
temperatures: 30 8C (i) to 350 8C (ii).
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–91 87
inert gas flushing at 30 8C. The calculation is based on the slope
of the concentration increase from the first desorption peak (see
Fig. 4). Since transport resistances both in the ZSM-5 film and
in the gas phase were neglected from the model, it is expected
that the resulting heat of adsorption would be overestimated.
3.3.1. NaZSM-5
As reported previously [13] and shown in Fig. 4(a), the
adsorbed species in the NaZSM-5 film can be classified into at
least three types of thermally stable species: low, intermediate
and high. The calculation for the estimated heat of adsorption
indicated that the adsorbed species that can be easily desorbed
early during TPD following NO2 equilibration at 30 8C have an
average heat of adsorption of about 49.7 kJ mol�1. This value is
at the upper limit of the heat of adsorption for physisorption
[40] probably due to the influence of transport resistance in the
NaZSM-5 film which is neglected in the model. The highly
thermally stable species are composed of two nitrate species
that also differ in thermal stability. The less stable nitrate
species was found to involve surface nitric acid in its formation
following reactions (2) and (5) above [13]. In situ DRIFT
spectroscopy measurements upon NO2 exposure to the
NaZSM-5 powder sample at 30 8C (see Fig. 5(a)) showed
the presence of nitrate species assigned to a feature at
1449 cm�1 [9,13] and surface nitric acid at 1551 and
1668 cm�1. These peaks from the nitric acid were found to
be unstable during NO exposure [13], since reaction (2) above
was reversed. Also, it was found that the presence of surface
nitric acid and hydroxyl groups could enhance the NOx
adsorption capacity for weakly adsorbed species. A detailed
discussion about the absorbed species and their interactions for
NaZSM-5 were reported previously [13].
3.3.2. HZSM-5
3.3.2.1. Thermal stability of adsorbed species. Fig. 4(b)
shows NOx desorption during TPD following NO2 equilibra-
tion at different temperatures for the HZSM-5 film. A
temperature increase following the equilibration at 30 8Cresults in a steep concentration increase that leads to the first
TPD peak. The concentration increase is similar to that which
arises from the NaZSM-5 film, suggesting it results from
desorption of similar adsorbed species. Since the release
occurs very quickly, it might be due to the release of
physisorbed NO2 still remaining in the ZSM-5 film after inert
gas flushing. The average heat of adsorption value of this
species estimated from the desorption profile, early during
TPD, was about 51.0 kJ mol�1 which is very close to that from
the NaZSM-5 film. Mass transport resistance in the ZSM-5
film could cause the release of the physisorbed species during
the inert gas flushing to be slow. However, the temperature
increase could activate the movement of the physisorbed
species in the ZSM-5 framework. The presence of physisorbed
NO2 on HZSM-5 in a 600 ppm NO2 atmosphere is also shown
by the in situ DRIFT spectroscopy measurements. As shown
in Fig. 5(b), a feature with a band at 1628 cm�1 is assigned to
the physisorbed NO2 and is similar to that observed on the
NaZSM-5 sample [13].
Besides the release of physisorbed species, the first
desorption peak from the HZSM-5 film might also be due to
the release of other weakly adsorbed species that differ slightly
in thermal stability. However, the peak from the HZSM-5 is
narrower and lower in intensity compared to that from the
NaZSM-5 film. This indicates that a lower quantity of the
weakly adsorbed species contributes to the appearance of the
first desorption peak of the HZSM-5 film compared to that from
the NaZSM-5 film. As seen in the Fig. 4(b), a further
temperature increase results in another NOx desorption peak
with a maximum at about 400 8C. Increasing the temperature to
above 400 8C results in a steep NOx concentration decrease that
is followed by an insignificant desorption above 500 8C.
However, it is interesting that TPD following NO2 adsorption at
350 8C results in a negligible NOx desorption (see Fig. 4(b)).
This observation indicates that the second peak from the
HZSM-5 film might belong to a specific surface species that is
relatively stable at high temperatures. Since cationic alkali or
Fig. 5. Infrared spectra following 600 ppm NO2 exposure at 30 8C for 5 min on NaZSM-5 (a), HZSM-5 (b) and BaZSM-5 (c). Dashed line is zero level.
Fig. 6. NOx-TPD profiles of HZSM-5 (a) and BaZSM-5 (b) after a sequence of
(i) 600 ppm NO2 equilibration and argon flushing at 200 8C, (ii) 600 ppm NO2
equilibration, argon flushing, 600 ppm NO equilibration and argon flushing at
200 8C and (iii) NO2 equilibration and argon flushing at 300 8C.
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–9188
alkaline earth metals are absent in the HZSM-5, this species
cannot be stable nitrates. It is more likely that the species is
surface nitric acid.
3.3.2.2. Stability of adsorbed species against NO atmos-
phere. The absorbed species formed in the HZSM-5 film were
further investigated by introducing 600 ppm NO to the NO2
equilibrated HZSM-5 film. Following the NO exposure, the
sample was then flushed with inert gas followed by TPD.
Fig. 6(a) shows the effect of NO exposure on the TPD profile for
the NO2 equilibrated HZSM-5. Following NO2 equilibration
and inert gas flushing at 200 8C, the NO exposure significantly
lowered the NOx desorption quantity and the TPD peak was at
slightly higher temperature compared to the desorption without
NO exposure. Thus, the peaks likely result from the desorption
of surface species having similar thermal stability. As
mentioned previously, the peaks are likely to result from the
decomposition of surface nitric acid in the HZSM-5. However,
as apparent from the figure, the NO feed seems unable to
completely remove the adsorbed species, by for example, the
reversal of reaction (2). TPD following NO2 adsorption at
300 8C caused a similar desorption peak to that after NO
exposure but with a lower intensity. Since part of the nitric acid
is stable against NO, there may be two possible ways to form
surface nitric acid in the HZSM-5. The first is due to a water–
NO2 interaction following reactions (2) or (3) and (4) above.
The second is a result of deprotonization following NO2
disproportionation.
Zeo�O��Hþ þNOþ þNO3�@ Zeo�O��NOþ þHþNO3
�:
(6)
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–91 89
The TPD observations indicate that the nitric acid species
formed through these two mechanisms are likely to have similar
thermal stability. A similar deprotonization reaction mechan-
ism for nitric acid formation was reported for H type mordenite
[10]. The presence of nitric acid and the nitrosium ion (NO+)
during NO2 adsorption on HZSM-5 is also confirmed by the in
situ DRIFT spectroscopy measurement with the HZSM-5
powder sample. As shown in Fig. 5(b), exposure of the
HZSM-5 powder to NO2 at 30 8C results in the development
of a feature with a band at 2129 cm�1 which represents the
stretching vibration of NO+ in HZSM-5 [12,41–43]. Mean-
while, a band at 1598 cm�1 is similar to that found for NaZSM-
5 (1551 cm�1) and can be attributed to the stretching vibration
of nitric acid molecules [13].
As noted above, the absence of cationic alkali or alkaline
earth metals causes HZSM-5 to be less hydrophilic. As a result,
the formation of surface nitric acid due to NO2–water
interaction is very limited, as indicated by the small amount
of NO formation during NO2 adsorption (Fig. 3). Although the
nitric acid can interact with Brønsted acid sites, there are few of
these interactions leading to a small quantity of weakly
adsorbed NOx containing species in the HZSM-5. As seen in
Fig. 5(b), the spectroscopy measurement after NO2 adsorption
on HZSM-5 shows a broad infrared spectrum in the range of
3500–3000 cm�1 that indicates interactions between nitric acid
molecules and OH groups with a small intensity. A temperature
increase to above 500 8C can, however, completely decom-
poses all nitric acid species in the HZSM-5 film (see Figs. 4(b)
and 6(a)).
3.3.3. BaZSM-5
3.3.3.1. Thermal stability of adsorbed species. Fig. 4(c)
shows NOx concentration profiles from TPDs with the NO2
equilibrated BaZSM-5 film. A temperature increase following a
sequence of NO2 equilibration and inert gas flushing at 30 8Cresults in NOx desorption that has a similar profile to that of the
HZSM-5 film. Two distinguishable concentration peaks are
visible. In comparison with the HZSM-5 film, the first
desorption peak of the BaZSM-5 film is broader due to a
high temperature shoulder. This indicates that the peak results
from the desorption of not only physisorbed species, but also
other weakly chemisorbed species. The average heat of
adsorption value estimated for the adsorbed species that could
be released early during TPD was about 53.9 kJ mol�1 which is
very close to those for the HZSM-5 and the NaZSM-5 films.
Similar to that seen with the HZSM-5 film, the second
desorption peak of the BaZSM-5 film has a maximum at about
the same temperature. Therefore, this peak can be attributed to
the decomposition of surface nitric acid in the BaZSM-5 film. A
further temperature increase to above 450 8C seems to cause
additional NOx desorption, indicated by the development of a
shoulder at high temperature. Moreover, TPD after NO2
equilibration at 300 8C results in additional NOx desorption
which is not observed from the HZSM-5 film. This indicates the
presence of another adsorbed species more stable than surface
nitric acid. As mentioned previously, stable nitrate species
might be formed on Ba sites. In situ DRIFT spectroscopy
measurements at 30 8C on the BaZSM-5 powder exposed to
600 ppm NO2 confirmed the presence of nitrate species. As
shown in Fig. 5(c), features with bands at 1450–1505 cm�1 may
characterize the vibrations of the nitrates.
In comparison with the surface nitrate species formed in the
NaZSM-5 film, the surface nitrate species in the BaZSM-5 film
apparently have lower thermal stability. As seen in Fig. 4(a and
c), high temperature NOx desorption (above 350 8C) for the
BaZSM-5 film has a peak at lower temperature. Also, the peak
for the BaZSM-5 film is lower in intensity indicating a small
amount of the nitrate species.
3.3.3.2. Stability of adsorbed species against NO
atmosphere. Fig. 6(b) shows the effect of NO exposure on
the stability of the adsorbed species in the BaZSM-5 film.
Preceding the NOx desorption by TPD, 600 ppm NO was fed to
the NO2 equilibrated BaZSM-5 film and then the film was
flushed with inert gas. As illustrated by the figure, the exposure
of the NO2 equilibrated BaZSM-5 film to NO at 200 8C results
in a large decrease in the NOx desorption quantity. However, the
NO feed does not completely eliminate the NOx desorption,
instead it causes another higher temperature peak to become
more discernible, which in the TPD after only NO2
equilibration was visible only as a slight high temperature
shoulder. This high temperature peak is also clear in the TPD
following NO2 equilibration at 300 8C. These observations
indicate that the peak at high temperature results from the
desorption or decomposition of adsorbed species more stable
than surface nitric acid. The large decrease in NOx desorption
due to the NO introduction is likely a result of the
decomposition of surface nitric acid and nitrate species
following the reversal of reactions (2) and (5). Meanwhile,
the peak at higher temperature should correspond to the
presence of nitrate species on Ba sites. These results indicate
that the formation of nitrate species in the BaZSM-5 does not
necessarily occur with the involvement of surface nitric acid
(reactions (2) and (5)) due to their resistance against NO
exposure.
In situ DRIFT spectroscopy measurements on the BaZSM-5
powder sample following NO2 adsorption at 30 8C indicated a
broad infrared spectrum developing in the wavenumber range
of 2200–3000 cm�1 (Fig. 5(c)). A similar infrared spectrum
was also observed with NaZSM-5 following NO2 adsorption
[13] and it was found that the intensity of the spectrum easily
collapsed after NO introduction. Therefore, the broad infrared
spectrum likely corresponds to the presence of surface nitric
acid in BaZSM-5 due to water–NO2 interaction. In NaZSM-5
the surface nitric acid formed might immediately interact with
the counter ion Na+ to form nitrate species and OH Brønsted
groups (reaction (5)) which become new sites for the adsorption
of additional NOx containing species [13,34]. In contrast, the
formation of the surface nitric acid in the BaZSM-5 is
apparently not followed by immediate reaction with cationic Ba
to form Brønsted sites. As a consequence, in situ spectroscopy
measurements on the BaZSM-5 powder exposed to NO2 show
an insignificant infrared spectrum development in the Brønsted
OH vibration frequency region (see Fig. 5(c)). In the interior of
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–9190
BaZSM-5 with low aluminum content, the formation of nitrates
through surface nitric acid might not be favorable. Although
surface nitric acid can be formed near barium sites, distances
between alumina sites might hinder the nitrate formation
according to reaction (5), compared to that with NaZSM-5. As
seen in Fig. 5(c), a feature with a frequency band at 1574 cm�1
is similar to that found in both NaZSM-5 (1551 cm�1) and
HZSM-5 (1598 cm�1) and is assigned to the stretching
vibration from nitric acid molecules.
The fact that nitrate species in BaZSM-5 films are stable in
an NO atmosphere suggests that they are formed primarily not
via surface nitric acid. An alternative pathway for their
formation is via the NO2 disproportionation reaction (3).
Subsequently, the NO+ binds to negatively charged sites in the
ZSM-5 framework, replacing the charge compensating Ba2+
which is further bound to NO3�.
2ðZeo�O�Þ�Ba2þ þ 2NOþ þ 2NO3�
@ 2ðZeo�O��NOþÞ þ Ba2þðNO3�Þ2: (7)
The in situ spectroscopy measurement on the powder sample
after NO2 adsorption shows the development of a feature at
2132 cm�1 (see Fig. 5(c)). This feature is often attributed to the
stretching vibration of NO+ in zeolites [12,41–43]. In addition,
another peak at 1739 cm�1 is clearly visible and it corresponds
to the formation N2O4 which is an intermediate product of the
NO2 disproportionation reaction.
However, as demonstrated by reaction (7), to form a
complete nitrate species, each Ba2+ counter ion needs two
charge compensating nitrates. In the interior of the ZSM-5, the
formation of the complete nitrate species might be hindered
either sterically or due to the fact that the Ba2+ cations are
positioned far from the framework negative charge sites due to
the high Si/Al ratio. Instead, each Ba2+ counter ion may capture
only one charge-compensating nitrate.
2ðZeo�O�Þ�Ba2þ þNOþ þNO3�
@ Zeo�O��NOþ þZeo�O��Ba2þ�NO3�: (8)
The reasons offered here to rationalize why nitrate formation is
less favorable in the BaZSM-5 film may also explain why the
few nitrates in BaZSM-5 have a lower thermal stability than
those in NaZSM-5 which is evident by comparing the high
temperature peaks in their respective TPD profiles (Fig. 4(a and
c)).
4. Conclusions
The present report dealt with a comparison of NOx
adsorption in ZSM-5 films with Na+, H+ and Ba2+ as counter
ions. Depending on the cations, adsorbed species having
different thermal stabilities could exist in the ZSM-5 films.
Besides the cations, residual water in the ZSM-5 also played
an important role in the adsorption. The presence of Na+
counter ions in the ZSM-5 was found to provide a high NOx
adsorption capacity over a wide temperature range. In HZSM-
5 film, in addition to physisorbed species, NO2 adsorption
could occur at relatively high temperatures and formed
species with moderate thermal stability, such as surface nitric
acid and nitrosium (NO+) ions. Surface nitric acid in the
HZSM-5 could be formed either by NO2–residual water
interactions or following an NO2 disproportionation pathway.
On the other hand, highly thermally stable nitrates,
moderately thermally stable nitric acid and weakly thermally
adsorbed species including physisorbed NO2 appeared to be
present in the BaZSM-5 film. The nitrates formed in the
BaZSM-5 were found to be mostly stable in an NO
atmosphere and thus did not apparently involve surface
nitric acid in their formation. Instead, NO2 disproportionation
led mainly to the development of the nitrate species.
However, the fewer nitrate species formed in the BaZSM-5
film and their lower thermal stability compared to those in the
NaZSM-5 film suggested that surface nitrate formation in the
BaZSM-5 was less favourable either due to sterical
hinderance or due to the poor anchoring of the Ba2+ cation
in the ZSM-5. The formation of fewer hydroxyl groups also
led to a lower adsorption capacity of the BaZSM-5 for weakly
adsorbed species.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the financial support of the
Swedish Research Council. I. Perdana and D. Creaser also
thank the SIDA-Swedish Research Links program for support.
Also the authors thank Alessandra Mosca at the Division of
Chemical Technology, Lulea University of Technology for
preparation of one of the monolith samples and some of the
characterization measurements.
References
[1] W.S. Epling, L.E. Campbell, A. Yezerets, N.W. Currier, J.E. Parks II, Cat.
Rev. 46 (2004) 163–245.
[2] O. Monticelli, R. Loenders, P.A. Jacobs, J.A. Martens, Appl. Catal. B 21
(1999) 215–220.
[3] A. Sultana, R. Loenders, O. Monticelli, C. Kirschhock, P.A. Jacobs, J.A.
Martens, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000) 2934–2937.
[4] J. Despres, M. Koebel, O. Krocher, M. Elsener, A. Wokaun, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 58 (2003) 175–183.
[5] J. Szanyi, J.H. Kwak, R.A. Moline, C.H.F. Peden, Phys. Chem. Chem.
Phys. 5 (2003) 4045–4051.
[6] J. Szanyi, J.H. Kwak, C.H.F. Peden, J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 3746–
3753.
[7] J.F. Brilhac, A. Sultana, P. Gilot, J.A. Martens, Environ. Sci. Technol. 36
(2002) 1136–1140.
[8] A. Penkova, K. Hadjiivanov, M. Mihaylov, M. Daturi, J. Saussey, J.C.
Lavalley, Langmuir 20 (2004) 5425–5431.
[9] J. Szanyi, M.T. Paffett, J. Catal. 164 (1996) 232–245.
[10] Z.-M. Wang, T. Arai, M. Kumagai, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40 (2001) 1864–
1871.
[11] K. Hadjiivanov, D. Klissurski, G. Ramis, G. Busca, Appl. Catal. B 7
(1996) 251–267.
[12] C. Sedlmair, B. Gil, K. Seshan, A. Jentys, J.A. Lercher, Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 5 (2003) 1897–1905.
[13] I. Perdana, D. Creaser, O. Ohrman, J. Hedlund, J. Catal. 234 (2005) 219–229.
[14] G. Centi, P. Generali, L. Dall’Olio, S. Perathoner, Z. Rak, Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 39 (2000) 131–137.
[15] J.M. Zamaro, M.A. Ulla, E.E. Miro, Catal. Today 107–108 (2005) 86–93.
I. Perdana et al. / Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 72 (2007) 82–91 91
[16] J.C. Jansen, J.H. Koegler, H. Van Bekkum, H.P.A. Calis, C.M. Van Den
Bleek, F. Kapteijn, J.A. Moulijn, E.R. Geus, N. Van Der Puil, Microporous
Mesoporous Mater. 21 (1998) 213–226.
[17] J. Caro, M. Noack, P. Kolsch, R. Schafer, Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
38 (2000) 3–24.
[18] R. Moos, R. Muller, C. Plog, A. Knezevic, H. Leye, E. Irion, T. Braun, K.-
J. Marquardt, K. Binder, Sens. Actuators B 83 (2002) 181–189.
[19] J. Coronas, J. Santamaria, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (2004) 4879–4885.
[20] J. Coronas, J. Santamaria, Top. Catal. 29 (2004) 29–44.
[21] M.A. Ulla, R. Mallada, J. Coronas, L. Gutierrez, E. Miro, J. Santamarıa,
Appl. Catal. A 253 (2003) 257–269.
[22] O. Ohrman, J. Hedlund, J. Sterte, Appl. Catal. A 270 (2004) 193–
199.
[23] E.I. Basaldella, A. Kikot, C.E. Quincoces, M.G. Gonzalez, Mater. Lett. 51
(2001) 289–294.
[24] J. Hedlund, O. Ohrman, V. Msimang, E. Van Steen, W. Bohringer, S.
Sibya, K. Moller, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (2004) 2647–2657.
[25] O. Ohrman, J. Hedlund, V. Msimang, K. Moller, Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 78 (2005) 199–208.
[26] J. Sterte, J. Hedlund, D. Creaser, O. Ohrman, W. Zheng, M. Lassinantti, Q.
Li, F. Jareman, Catal. Today 69 (2001) 323–329.
[27] J. Sterte, J. Hedlund, B.J. Schoeman, US Patent to Exxon Chemical
6,177,373 (2001).
[28] O. Ohrman, U. Nordgren, D. Creaser, J. Hedlund, J. Sterte, in: A.
Galarneau, F. Di Renzo, F. Fajula, J. Vedrine (Eds.), Zeolites and
Mesoporous Material at the Dawn of the 21st Century, Studies in Surface
Science and Catalysis, vol. 135, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001, p. 20-P09.
[29] O. Ohrman, J. Hedlund, V. Msimang, K. Moller, J. Sterte, 14th Interna-
tional Zeolite Conference, Cape Town, April 25–30, 2004.
[30] J. Hedlund, B.J. Schoeman, J. Sterte, in: H. Chon, S.-K. Ihm, Y.S. Uh (Eds.),
Progress in Zeolites and Microporous Materials, Studies in Surface Science
and Catalysis, vol. 105, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1997, p. 2203.
[31] K. Tsutsumi, K. Mizoe, Colloids Surf. 37 (1989) 29–38.
[32] J. Sarkany, Appl. Catal. A 188 (1999) 369–379.
[33] J.C. Moıse, J.P. Bellat, A. Methivier, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 43
(2001) 91–101.
[34] Y. Dimitrova, S. Peyerimhoff, Chem. Phys. 254 (2000) 125–134.
[35] B.C. Gates, Catalytic Chemistry, John Willey and Sons, New York, 1992.
[36] J. Datka, M. Boczar, B. Gil, Langmuir 9 (1993) 2496–2498.
[37] J.-P. Joly, A. Perrard, Langmuir 17 (2001) 1538–1542.
[38] F. Foeth, J. Mugge, R. Van der Vaart, H. Bosh, T. Reith, Adsorption 2
(1996) 279–286.
[39] L.L. Raja, R.J. Kee, O. Deutschmann, J. Warnatz, L.D. Schmidt, Catal.
Today 59 (2000) 47–60.
[40] R.I. Masel, Principles of Adsorption and Reaction on Solid Surfaces, John
Wiley and Sons, New York, 1996.
[41] K. Hadjiivanov, J. Saussey, J.L. Freysz, J.C. Lavalley, Catal. Lett. 52
(1998) 103–108.
[42] K.I. Hadjiivanov, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 24 (1998) 41–49.
[43] K.I. Hadjiivanov, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 42 (2000) 71–144.