050920175AZND3KMminutesof83-105th.pdf - Environmental ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of 050920175AZND3KMminutesof83-105th.pdf - Environmental ...
1
Minutes of the 83rd meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 28.09.2015, under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 390-392 dated 17.09.2015 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for Extension & Expansion of “Residential
Plotted Colony” located at Sector 36-39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s
Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd.
The project proposal along with observations of SEAC was lastly considered in
the 79th meeting of SEIAA held on 09.01.2015 and it was noticed that the project
proponent on 28.10.2014 submitted application for seeking Extension & Expansion of
validity of Environment Clearance granted by MOEF, GOI vide letter dated 07.01.2008
for construction of “Residential Plotted Colony” located at Sector 36-39, Panipat,
Haryana. The SEAC in its recommendation has reported that the compliance report
issued by RO, MOEF, GOI dated 21.08.2014 shows that the work is quite incomplete and
completion certificate for only a part of the project has been issued on 10.02.2014. The
EC already granted was valid up to 06.01.2013 and any work executed afterwards
tantamount to violation of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. The SEAC has
recommended that this case may be decided at the level of SEIAA.
It was noticed that the project site was monitored by RO, MOEF on 24.04.2014
and as per compliance report the status of construction of the already granted EC project
is as under:
1. Road network Completed
2. Sewer line 100%
3. Storm line Completed
4. Electricity network Completed
5. Underground tanks for water storage Completed
6. Plantation 80%
7. Parks development 23 parks are completed and 9 parks are under
development
8. Plots sold out 85%
9. Villas 16 are complete
Status of other building in given below:-
1. Nursery School Yet to be started
2. Primary School Yet to be started
3. High School Yet to be started
4. Creche Yet to be started
5. Dispensary Yet to be started
6. Religious places Yet to be started
7. EWS 163 plots have been handed over to Housing Board,
Haryana which are under construction
8. Club Under construction
9. Taxi Stand Yet to be started
2
It was also found that the project proponent has not forwarded the proper
documents pertaining to this project to the member. The Authority decided that the matter
regarding consideration of expansion of project can be considered only after the matter
regarding grant of extension to the validity of EC granted is sorted out. Accordingly the
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be
asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15 days or before next
meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall supply copy of updated Form I, Form IA, conceptual
plan and certified copy of compliance report to the members of SEIAA for
consideration of their case for extension of validity of environment clearance.
[2] The project proponent shall give the justified reasons for delay in submission of
application for extension of validity of EC.
[3] The project proponent shall give the justified reasons for not completing the
project within validity of EC.
[4] The project proponent shall clarify why the development of public utility services
were not taken up along with the development of residential plots.
[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with authenticated proof that
no construction was taken up at the site after the expiry of validity of EC.
The project proponent on 16.02.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 16.02.2015 was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
The Authority was of the view that the recommendation made by SEAC are not clear and
do not state that no construction has taken place after the expiry of validation of
Environment Clearance letter. Accordingly, the Authority decided to refer back this case
to SEAC with the advice to re-appraise the case and may communicate a clear opinion in
this case.
Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Proposed ‘Group Housing Scheme’ at
village- Rewazpur, Sector- 89, Faridabad, Haryana by M/S Ferrous
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 81st meeting of SEIAA
held on 18.02.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred with the decision that the
project proponent shall submit solar path analyses ensuring that the orientation of the
building is proper and the sun light will be available to the proposed dwelling units.
The project proponent on 20.02.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
3
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 20.02.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:
1. The comments of SEAC should be taken on the information dated 20.02.2015
submitted by the project proponent.
2. The height of building is 63 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance
from the recognize institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering
College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for
fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The
project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
4. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
(11.362 acres) in the revenue estate of Village Daula, Sector-49,
Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Pyramid Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 79th meeting of SEIAA
held on 09.01.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred with the decision that the
project proponent shall submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15 days
or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan showing
separate Exit ramp from basement.
[2] The project proponent shall submit soft copy and hard copy of the solar path
analysis.
The project proponent on 27.02.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
4
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 27.02.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:
1. The comments of SEAC should be taken on the information dated 27.02.2015
submitted by the project proponent.
2. The height of building is 113.80 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance
from the recognize institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering
College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for
fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The
project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
4. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
(2.5625 acre) located in the Revenue Estate of Village Gurgaon,
Sector-3, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Santur Realtor Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred with the decision that the
project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall seek clarification from competent Authority regarding
no objection about the existence of entry and exit gate as proposed in the plan
under the 66 KV HT line.
[2] The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan showing 6
meter wide ramp instead of 4 meter.
The project proponent on 09.03.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
5
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 09.03.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed
to submit clarification from the authorised competent authority of Electricity department.
The project proponent should submit clarification from the competent authority of
electricity department as was desired by the Authority and further observed that:
1. The SEAC should examine the revise traffic circulation plan submitted by project
proponent vide letter dated 09.03.2015.
2. The project proponent shall obtain clarification from the competent authority of
electricity department and shall submit the same to SEAC.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
4. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [5] Revised EC Proposed Group Housing Project “The Ultima” (22.231
acres) at Sector-81, Village-Lakhnola, Gurgaon by M/s DLF Homes
Developers Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred on the request of project
proponent with the decision that the project proponent shall submit permission of
competent authority for use of revenue rasta for laying of services line.
The project proponent on 13.03.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 13.03.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed
to submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta. The project
proponent should submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta as
was desired by the Authority and further observed that:
6
1. The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of
revenue rasta and shall submit the same to SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. The height of building is 96.85 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance
from the recognized institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering
College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for
fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The
project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Complex namely
“Ansal Heights” at Sector-92, Village- Wazirpur, Tehsil & Distt.
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred with the decision that the
project proponent shall submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta
for laying of services line.
The project proponent on 13.03.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 13.03.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed
to submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta. The project
proponent should submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta as
was desired by the Authority and further observed that:
1. The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of
revenue rasta and shall submit the same to SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
7
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for the commercial complex project –
Spaze Buziness Park, Sector-66, Village- badshahpur, District-
Gurgaon by M/S KAY KAY Designer Towers Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015, wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the
project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license.
The project proposal could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse
of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for
taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case
was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The case was taken up in the today’s meeting and it was observed that the project
proponent has failed to submit copy of re-validated license and further observed that:
1. The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license to the SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for the proposed commercial colony INXT
CITY CENTER at village Shikopur, Sector-83, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Trishul Industries.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015, wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the
8
project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of validated license.
The project proponent on 20.03.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 20.03.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has
submitted copy of revalidated license. The Authority has further observed that:
1. The project proponent has not submitted assurance of water supply from
competent authority and shall obtain the same and submit the same to SEAC.
2. The project proponent has not submitted assurance of power supply from
competent authority and shall obtain the same and submit the same to SEAC.
3. The project proponent shall obtain copy of valid accreditation certificate issued by
NABET/QCI in respect of EIA consultant engaged by them and submit the same
to the SEAC.
4. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
5. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking declaring that no
construction has been started at the site along with photograph to the SEAC.
6. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for the Project “Vatika Express City”
Resedential plotted Colony on total land measuring 100.875 acres
located in the revenue estate of village Harsaru, Hayatpur, Sector-
88A and 88B, Distt-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vatika Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015, wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the
9
project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit self contained note with authenticated proof
about the shifting of HT lines and showing that the vacant unplanned pockets in
the licensed area are actually affected by the existence of HT lines. The proposed
plan of the said un planned pocket areas, once HT lines are shifted.
[2] The project proponent shall submit revised green belt development plan
earmarking space of make provision for green-park for the residents as per
assurance given in the meeting.
[3] The project proponent shall provide Old age home on 0.25 acre of licensed area
and shall submit a plan.
[4] The project proponent shall submit dual plumbing plan showing layout of infra
structure facilities without crossing revenue rasta.
The project proponent on 20.02.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 20.02.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:
1. The comments of SEAC should be taken on the information dated 20.02.2015
submitted by the project proponent.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
4. The project proponent shall submit revised green belt development plan
earmarking space of make provision for green-park for the residents as the same
has not been submitted.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
10
Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT/Cyber Park located
at Industrial Sector 19, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Dominant Offset
Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015, wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the
project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations
within 15 days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit NOC from Airport Authority.
[2] The project proponent shall submit copy of validated license.
The project proponent on 20.02.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken
up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was
transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken
by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on
31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The reply dated 20.02.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has
submitted NOC from AAI regarding height clearance but failed to submit copy of
revalidated license. The Authority and further observed that:
1. The project proponent shall obtain copy of revalidated license and shall submit the
same to SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [11] Environmental Clearance for the development of Industrial Estate
and CETP at I.E. Barhi, Phase-III near Gannaur, District –
Sonepat, Haryana by HSIIDC.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 80th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.01.2015, wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the
project proponent may be asked to submit permission for withdrawal of ground water
from CGWA within 30 days.
The case could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking
11
needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was
transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The case was taken up in the today’s meeting and it was observed that the project
proponent has failed to submit the permission for withdrawal of Ground water.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [12] Environmental Clearance for expansion of existing Panipat Institute
of Engineering and Technology 70 milestone, Pattikalayana,
Smalkha, Panipat. (Developed by Vidyapeeth Educational Trust) by
Panipat Institute of Engineering &Technology.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 79th meeting of SEIAA
held on 09.01.2015. It was observed that the SEAC has recommended this project for
Environmental Clearance subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has
proposed the expansion of existing Panipat Institute of Engineering and Technology 70
milestone, Pattikalayana, Smalkha, Panipat. (Developed by Vidyapeeth Educational
Trust) with the proposal as given under:
Particulars Existing Expansion Total
Total Plot Area 21032.72 sqm 33005 sqm 54037.72 sqm
Built up area 18962.16 sqm 22177.84 sqm 41139 sqm
Ground Coverage 8060.04 sqm 4519.25 sqm 12579.29 sqm
Details of Blocks
Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 17
Block A, A, B & C
Existing = 12 +
Proposed = 4
Height 21 m - 21 m
Green Area 11416 sqm 11188.683 sqm 22604.683 sqm
Total water requirement 300 KLD 251.25 KLD 551.25 KLD
Fresh water requirement 127.4 KLD 152.6 KLD 280 KLD
Waste water generation 121.43 KLD 148.53 KLD 270 KLD
STP Capacity 141.05KLD 168.95 KLD 310 KLD
Power requirement 184.496 KW 265.498 KW 449.994 KW
RWH pits 6 pits 9 pits 15 pits
Solid waste management 1760 kg/day 3944 kg/day 5704 kg/day
Proposed parking 3371.94 sqm 2726.26 sqm 6098.20 sqm
The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due
to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of
India for taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and
the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The case was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The project
proposal was examined in terms of MoEF &CC Govt. of India amended Notification S.O
3252(E) dated 22.12.2014, providing exemption to the project from obtaining
environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
12
The members of Authority were having different opinion based on their
interpretation of the amended notification. However Chairman SEIAA concluded the
discussions with the remarks, the text of which is as under:
“I am of considered opinion that nobody should sit upon the matter, where it
ceased to have jurisdiction. This application was received on 30.09.2014 and more than
one year period has passed still we are reluctant to dispose of the matter. This is eloquent
testimony of our thinking. It is crystal clear neither SEIAA nor SEAC has any
jurisdiction, in view of MOEF & CC, GOI Notification S.O.3252(E) dated 22.12.2014
stating that the construction of Industrial Shed, School, College, Hostel for Educational
Institutions and Universities are now not included in the notification but such buildings
shall ensure sustainable environment management, solid and liquid waste management,
rain water harvesting and use of re-cycle material. The MOEF &CC, GOI vide OM 19-
2/2013-IA-III dated 09.06.2015 has also issued guidelines to be followed for building
projects to ensure sustainable environment management by the project proponents before
the start of construction. Abortive efforts were made to have consensus on the matter.
Taking in view the opinion of other two members of SEIAA, the case is remanded
back to SEAC for deciding the case as per MOEF GOI Notification dated 22.12.2014”.
Item No. [13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Hotel Project at Sector-60,
Gurgaon by M/s Toucan Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 82nd meeting of
SEIAA held on 09.03.2015. It is observed that the SEAC has recommended this project
for Environmental Clearance subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent
has proposed expansion of Hotel Project at Sector-60, Gurgaon.
Total Plot Area: 3.17 Acre Total Built up area: 38177 sqm
Modification Details
Particulars Existing as per
EC received
Requested Modification in Existing EC
(with justification)
Built-up Area (m2) 35937 38177
(Additional Area is based on revised
sanctioned plan and compoundable area
permitted under HUDA bye-laws)
No. of Floors in Tower A
(Commercial)
G+5 G+6
(revised sanction has been received from
HUDA & submitted to SEAC)
No. of Floors in Tower B
(Red Fox Hotel)
G+11
(service floor
was sanctioned
by HUDA but
not covered in
EC)
G+S+11
(revised sanction has been received from
HUDA & submitted to SEAC)
No. of Floors in Tower C
(Lemon Tree Hotel)
G+10
(service floor
was sanctioned
G+S+9
(revised sanction has been received from
HUDA & submitted to SEAC)
13
by HUDA but
not covered in
EC)
No. of Rooms in Tower B
(Red Fox Hotel)
171 155
No. of Rooms in Tower C
(Lemon Tree Hotel)
126 110
Car Parking 515 463
Laundry Not Proposed Proposed in Lower Basement
(reduced floor area for parking
compensated by provision of double stack
parking)
ETP Not Proposed Proposed (for laundry)
STP capacity 263 KLD 295 KLD
The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due
to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of
India for taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and
the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
The case was taken up for the consideration in the today’s meeting and the
Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent has not obtained the assurance for water supply from
competent authority. The project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to
the SEAC.
2. The project proponent shall submit proof of having deposited up to date EDC/IDC
paid to the concerned department to the SEAC.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
4. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [14] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Project
(20.625 Acres) at Village Ullawas, Sector-60 & 63-A, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s High Responsible Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 82nd meeting of
SEIAA held on 09.03.2015, wherein It is observed that the project proponent has
submitted copy of letter of Intent dated 05.09.2014 issued by Town and Country Planning
Department for grant of license for the additional area measuring 2.525 acre but the
14
Town and Country Planning Department has not granted license for the same. The
representative of the project proponent submitted a letter requesting to defer their case till
they submit copy of license.
The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due
to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of
India for taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and
the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
In the today’s meeting the project proposal was taken up for consideration and it
was observed that the project proponent has failed to submit the license for additional
area measuring 2.525 acre. The Authority further observed that:
1. The project proponent shall obtained license for the additional area and shall
submit the same to the SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license
3. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of water supply from competent
authority and shall submit the same to the SEAC.
4. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply from competent
authority and shall submit the same to the SEAC.
5. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
6. The height of building is 147.1 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance
from the recognize institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering
College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for
fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The
project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.
7. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
15
Item No. [15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
in the revenue estate of Village Kadarpur & Maidawas, District-
Gurgaon, Sector-63 A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s
Mahamaya Exports Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 82nd meeting of
SEIAA held on 09.03.2015. It was noticed that the SEAC has recommended this project
for Environmental Clearance subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent
has proposed the construction of Group Housing Colony in the revenue estate of Village
Kadarpur & Maidawas, District- Gurgaon, Sector-63 A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban
Complex on a total plot area of 56757.071 sqm. The total built up area shall be
143428.761 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 3 Residential towers with
basement, 3 towers of Tower A (S + 19), 4 towers of Tower B (S + 22), 4 towers of
Tower C (G+19), EWS (G + 7), Convenient Shopping (G), Community building (G +1)
& and 2 nursery schools (G + 1). The Group Housing project shall have 686 Dwelling
Units, 124 EWS Units and 84 Domestic servant Units. The maximum height of the
building shall be 71.20 meter. The total water requirement shall be 724 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 419 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 508 KLD,
which will be treated in the STP of 600 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall
be 7985.699 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has
proposed to develop green belt on 44.69% of project area (30% tree plantation + 14.69%
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 14 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 2256 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed
are 1345 ECS.
The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due
to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of
India for taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and
the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and project details were
taken up for consideration and following observation were made by the Authority:
1. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of water supply from competent
authority and shall submit the same to the SEAC.
2. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply from competent
authority and shall submit the same to the SEAC
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license
16
4. The project proponent shall obtain copy of valid accreditation certificate issued by
NABET/QCI in respect of EIA consultant engaged by them and submit the same
to the SEAC.
5. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
6. The height of building is 71.20 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance
from the recognize institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering
College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for
fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The
project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.
7. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for Affordable group hosing colony (10
acres) in the revenue estate of village Hayatpur, Sector -90, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Aster Infrahome Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 82nd meeting of
SEIAA held on 09.03.2015. It was noticed that the SEAC has recommended this project
for Environmental Clearance subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent
has proposed the construction of Affordable group hosing colony (10 acres) in the
revenue estate of village Hayatpur, Sector -90, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of
40519.149 sqm (10 acre). The total built up area shall be 94525.98 sqm. The Group
Housing project shall have 13 residential towers consisting of Tower 1 (Ground+14
Floors), Tower 2 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 3 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 4 (Ground
+14 Floors), Tower 5 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 6 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 7
(Ground +14 Floors), Tower 8 (Ground +9 Floors), Tower 9 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower
10 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 11 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 12 (Ground +14 Floors),
Tower 13 (Ground +14 Floors), Commercial, community, crèche, etc. The maximum
height of the building shall be 50.35 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1195
KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 799 KLD. The waste water generation shall
be 982 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 1180 KLD capacity. The total power
17
requirement shall be 3510 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 21.54% of project area (15.54% tree
plantation + 6% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 11 rain water
harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 4323 kg/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total
parking spaces proposed are 916 ECS.
The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due
to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of
India for taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and
the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and project details were
taken up for consideration and following observation were made by the Authority:
1. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
collection of solid waste and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. The project proponent shall ensure the applicability of standards and codes for fire
and safety.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
**********
1
Minutes of the 84th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 29.10.2015, under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 443-445 dated 23.10.2015 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for the Proposed Residential Plotted
Colony “SONI PALM CITY” located at Village: Budda Khera,
Sector- 32, 32-A, District- karnal, Haryana by M/s Soni Realtors Pvt.
Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC in this case was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent on 18.07.2011 submitted Form 1, Form 1A and Conceptual
plan to the MoEF, GoI for seeking Environmental Clearance under item no. 8(a)
of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 for the proposed residential plotted colony
having total plot area 204022.26 sqm and permissible built up area 22913.5 sqm.
2. The case was transferred to SEIAA on 18.05.2012 after the constitution of 2nd term
of SEIAA on 21.03.2012.
3. The Secretary SEAC advised the project proponent to submit complete
information on the observation as raised in the letter within 30 days vide letter no.
319 dated 09.08.2012. The project proponent failed to submit the reply. The
Secretary SEAC issued final notice for submission of reply within 15 days falling
which the case will be recommended for filling vide letter no. 293 dated
03.06.2013. The project proponent in response to final notice for submission of
reply dated 06.06.2013 issued by Secretary SEAC informed that their project
proposal does not fall under the purview of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 on
the basis of clarification dated 29.11.2011 issued by Regional Office, MOEF GOI
Chandigarh.
4. The SEAC advised the project proponent to give the details of built up area on the
basis of permissible FAR. The SEAC in its 98th meeting held on 09.01.2014 found
that the project proponent has not responded adequately regarding built up area
and forwarded the case on 20.01.2014 to the SEIAA for taking further action.
5. The SEIAA in its 67th meeting held on 28.02.2014 referred back this case to SEAC
with the advice to visit the site in order to assess the latest status of construction
and exact proposed built up area of the project proposal and thereafter send the
recommendation within stipulated period. The case was referred to the SEAC vide
Memo No. SEIAA/HR/14/447 Dated 12.03.2014.
2
6. The SEAC constituted a sub-committee for site inspection. The sub-committee
visited the site on 30.07.2014. The sub-committee reported that as the total built
up area involved is 148807 which is less than 150000 sqmt and as per clarification
given by RO, MOEF GOI, the project does not require environment clearance.
The sub-committee also reported that the development of the project is at an
advanced stage and no violation of any kind had been noticed.
7. The report of the sub-committee was discussed in the 103rd meeting of SEAC held
on 28.04.2014 and the SEAC submitted the case to SEIAA to take a view and
further process accordingly. “As reported in the sub-committee report the case
under consideration is recommended to be filed.”
8. The recommendation of SEAC was considered in the 75th meeting of SEIAA held
on 16.09.2014. It was noticed that the built up area involved is 148807 sqmt and it
was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the advice to appraise this
project under item no. 8(a) and send recommendation on merit. The case was
referred back to SEAC vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/14/1306 dated 17.06.2014.
9. The SEAC in its 117th meeting held on 18.02.2015 considered this case in view of
SEIAA findings and reiterated their stand that project does not need environment
clearance. Since the SEIAA is not accepting the recommendation/views of SEAC.
The SEIAA may seek clarification on the subject from MOEF GOI.
10. No action on the recommendation of SEAC was taken as the term of SEIAA
lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MOEF&CC, GOI. No action
was taken by MOEF&CC, GOI and the case was transferred to SEIAA Haryana
on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.
It was observed that the SEAC in its recommendation has reported the clarification
of RO, MOEF&CC GOI Chandigarh dated 29.11.2011 submitted by the project
proponent stating that the project activity does not require environment clearance as the
project activity does not fall under the purview of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. It
was also noticed that the SEIAA in its 75th meeting held on 16.09.2014 decided that as
the built up area involved is 148807 sqm therefore project activity requires environment
clearance under item no. 8 (a) of EIA Notification 14.09.2006. As there was conflict in
opinion regarding applicability of EIA Notification in this case, a decision was taken to
seek clarification from MOEF&CC, GOI in the matter.
Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing
Complex “PSA (6 Acre)” Basai at Sector-37C, Manesar, Gurgaon by
M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 06.11.2012
3
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent has submitted license no. 64 of 2011 issued by Town and
Country Planning Department for development of group housing colony on an
area of 17 acres.
2. The SEIAA on the same license had already granted environment clearance for
development of 11 acres of licensed area out of total 17 acre of the licensed area to
M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
3. The environmental clearance to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. was
granted on the recommendation of SEAC. The EC letter was issued on
15.04.2014.
4. The AAI clearance submitted by the M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present
project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
5. The approved zoning plan dated 09.03.2012 submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions
Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech
Services Pvt. Ltd.
6. The NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification
submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the
name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
7. The EDC/IDC receipt submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present
project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
It was observed by the Authority that this case is not fit for consideration as
SEIAA has already granted environmental clearance on the recommendation of the
SEAC to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. and all the vital documents submitted
by the project proponent are in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. to
which EC has already been granted, whereas the application has been submitted by M/s
Prime IT Solution Pvt. Ltd, which is contradictory in terms. It appears that the SEAC has
not considered this fact at all.
In view of the above observations it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by
the Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as
prescribed in the notification.
4
Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for the construction of Group Housing
Colony (14.30 Acres) at Village-Harsaru and Hayatpur, Sector-89 A,
Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent submitted
application for seeking clearance for the project on 09.01.2014. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. Since the height of building is 64.60 meter hence clearance from the recognize
institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering College/National Institute of
Technology etc regarding structural stability and for fire safety clearance from
institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The project proponent shall obtain
the same and submit to the SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan
showing area ear marked for composting.
3. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
4. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
5. The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for
composting
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
5
Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Commercial
Colony located at Village Dhankot, Sector-102, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Clarion Properties Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 subject to stipulation stated therein. It was noticed that the
project proponent on 01.09.2014 submitted application for seeking clearance for the
project. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of
SEIAA lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No
action was taken at the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on
31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration. It was observed that the project proponent has proposed the expansion of
project as under:
Particulars Existing as per EC Expansion Total
Plot area 14,012.24 sqm 9647.76 sqm 23660 sqm
Built up area 39997.30 sqm 31979.70 sqm 71977 sqm
Mxm. height 35 meter 17.2 meter 52.2 meter
Parking 828 ECS 167 ECS 995 ECS
Power req. 3,137 KVA
1423 KVA
4,560 KVA
(DHBVN)
T. Water req. 242 KLD 358 KLD 600 KLD
Domestic water
demand
109 KLD 376 KLD 485 KLD
Fresh water 97 KLD 156 KLD 253 KLD
Waste water 169 KLD 265 KLD 434 KLD
STP capacity 210 KLD 290 KLD 500 KLD
Green area 30% .41% 30.41%
RWH 3 pits 3 pits 6 pits
Solid waste 968 kg/day 1,006 kg/day 1,974 kg/day
Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted the assurance of
HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services
for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. It was found that the calculation of solid waste of the already existing project
6
is not in accordance with the prescribed norms of 500 gram/capita/day. The project
proponent is required to submit revised calculation of solid waste generation of the entire
project @ 500 gram/capita/day. It was also observed that the project proponent has not
earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to
submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30.41% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for
composting.
[6] The project proponent shall submit revised solid waste calculation @ 500
gram/capita/day of the entire project.
[7] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
located in the revenue estate of Village Sohna, Sector-2 of Sohna,
District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Shree Vardhman Developers Pvt.
Ltd
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 10.10.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted the assurance of
7
HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services
for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. It was found that the project proponent has not discussed the solid waste
management and also not earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and
treatment of bio-degradable waste. It was also noticed that the project proponent has not
given the dimensions entry and exit ramp of the basement.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent shall submit the following information within 15 days
or before the next meeting of Authority.
1. The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also
submit plan earmarking space for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
2. The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for
composting.
3. The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan indicating
dimension of entry and exit ramp of basement.
Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony “Happy Homes” located in the revenue estate of
Village Budena, Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Auric Homes
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 10.10.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan
showing area ear marked for composting.
8
2. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
3. The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for the Affordable group housing project
“SRS Palm” Sector -07, Palwal, Haryana by M/s SRS Real Estate
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 subject to stipulation stated therein. It was noticed that the
project proponent on 04.11.2014 submitted application for seeking clearance for the
project. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of
SEIAA lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No
action was taken at the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on
31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable group housing
project “SRS Palm” Sector -07, Palwal, Haryana on a total plot area of 40415.0816 sqm
(9.98 acre). The total built up area shall be 99004.765 sqm. The Group Housing project
shall have 6 Residential towers, Tower A has 9 Pockets (Stilt+14 floors), Tower B has 4
Pockets (Stilt +10 floors), Tower C has 2 Pockets (Stilt+12), Tower D1 has 1 Pocket
(Stilt+9 floors), Tower E1 has 1 Pocket (G+6 floors), Tower F1 has 1 Pocket (Stilt+10
floors), Commercial Complex, Aaganwadi and Community center. The Group Housing
project shall have 733 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be
47.53 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1244 KLD. The fresh water
requirement shall be 830 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1020 KLD, which
will be treated in the STP of 1200 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be
15202 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to
develop green belt on 20.05% of project area (13.99% tree plantation + 6.1%
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 10 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 4487 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed
are 949 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
9
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was found that the
project proponent has not earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to
submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.05% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit the plan depicting area clearly ear marked for
composting.
[5] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony at village
Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 04.11.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted the assurance of
HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services
for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
10
clearance. It was found that the project proponent has not discussed the solid waste
management and also not earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent shall submit the following information within 15 days
or before the next meeting of Authority.
1. The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also
submit plan earmarking space for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
2. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
3. The project proponent shall submit the plan depicting area clearly ear marked for
composting.
Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing located at Sector-70A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pyramid
Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 11.11.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 18% of the project
area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project proponent
shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015 submitted
revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the same.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan
showing area ear marked for composting.
11
3. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
4. The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony
located at Village Daultabad, Sector-103, Dist. Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Bhagwati Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 subject to stipulation stated therein. It was noticed that the
project proponent on 11.11.2014 submitted application for seeking clearance for the
project. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of
SEIAA lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No
action was taken at the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on
31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA.
The project Proponent has proposed the construction of Commercial Colony at
Village Daultabad, Sector-103, Dist. Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 12798.163
sqm (3.16 acres). The total built up area shall be 38660.072 sqm. The proposed Project
shall comprise 2 basements + GF+ 12 floors. The maximum height of the building shall
be 58.5 meter. The total water requirement shall be 100 KLD. The fresh water
requirement shall be 29 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 89 KLD, which will
be treated in the separate STP of 110 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be
3305.88 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed
to develop green belt on 29.25% of project area (14.25% tree plantation + 15%
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 03 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 699 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed
are 539 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
12
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was noticed that the project proponent was has given undertaking that no construction
shall be raised in the ROW reserved for HT line passing through the project area. It was
also noticed that the project proponent has not earmarked the space for solid waste
management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable
waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to
submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 29.25% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5] The project proponent shall ensure that the plinth level of the building block
to be 1.5 meter above 100 years flood level of the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[6] The project proponent shall obtain NOC from HUDA as well as Irrigation
Department before the start of construction, regarding possible adverse effect
of project proposal on the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[7] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[8] The project proponent shall submit plan depicting the area ear marked for
composting.
[9] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
Item No. [11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony Project located in the revenue estate of Village
Badshahpur, Sector 69/70 Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex,
District Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Premium Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 subject to stipulation stated therein. It was noticed that the
project proponent on 11.11.2014 submitted application for seeking clearance for the
project. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of
SEIAA lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No
13
action was taken at the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on
31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony Project located in the revenue estate of Village
Badshahpur, Sector 69/70 Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex, District Gurgaon on a total
plot area of 20512.47 sqm. The total built up area shall be 44960.12 sqm. The Group
Housing project shall have 7 Residential blocks, Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Type A (GF+14
floors), Block 1 of Type- B (GF + 4 floors), Commercial area (GF + 1 floor), Community
Hall & Creche (GF+ 3 floors) etc. The Group Housing project shall have Block 1 to 6 of
Type A (714 DUs) and Type B (40 DUs). The maximum height of the building shall be
44.85 meter. The total water requirement shall be 543 KLD. The fresh water requirement
shall be 363 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 445 KLD, which will be treated in
the STP of 540 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3769 KVA which
will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt
on 20% of project area (15% tree plantation + 5% landscaping). The Project Proponent
proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be
1958 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting
appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 415 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding existence of revenue rasta, water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the
assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA
for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC
from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from
AAI regarding height clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has not
earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for collection,
segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to
submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
14
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[5] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
[6] The project proponent shall submit plan depicting the area ear marked for
composting.
Item No. [12] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
measuring 13.2118 Acres at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, Dpistrict
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 04.12.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. Since the height of building is 94.20 meter hence clearance from the recognize
institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering College/National Institute of
Technology etc regarding structural stability and for fire safety clearance from
institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The project proponent shall obtain
the same and submit to the SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
15
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
4. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [13] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony Project at Village Sohna & Khaika, Sector-4, Distt
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s GLS Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 04.12.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 15.66% of the
project area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project
proponent shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015
submitted revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the
same.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit plan
depicting the area ear marked for composting.
3. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
4. The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.
16
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No. [14] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony Project at Village Sihi, Sector-36-A, Distt Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s AVL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 subject to stipulation stated therein. It was noticed that the
project proponent on 04.12.2014 submitted application for seeking clearance for the
project. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of
SEIAA lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No
action was taken at the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on
31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony Project at Village Sihi, Sector-36-A, Distt Gurgaon,
Haryana on a total plot area of 36582.512 sqm (9.03975 acres). The total built up area
shall be 99573.631 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 5 Blocks (Stilt + 10
Floors). The proposed project shall have 1480 Dwelling Units (1BHK & 2BHK),
Commercial, Community Center and Anganwadi–cum-creche. The maximum height of
the building shall be 38.85 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1071 KLD. The
fresh water requirement shall be 677 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 893
KLD, which will be treated in the two STPs of 600 KLD + 500 KLD capacity. The total
power requirement shall be 6700 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 23.151% of project area (12.645% tree
plantation + 10.505% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 09 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 3959 kg/day. The bio-
degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology.
The total parking spaces proposed are 740 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
17
was noticed that the project proponent has given undertaking stating that no construction
shall be raised in the ROW reserved for HT line. It was also noticed that the project
proponent has not earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for
collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to
submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 23.15% of project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[5] The project proponent shall submit plan depicting clearly the area earmarked for
composting.
Item No. [15] Environmental Clearance for Mining of minor minerals “Road Metal
& Masonry Stone” at village Mukundpura, District Mahendergarh,
Haryana by Shri Satish Kumar Garg.
The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the
stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for
discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 11.11.2014
submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th
meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed
on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at
the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the
reconstitution of SEIAA.
The Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent has not submitted NOC from the Forest Department. The
project proponent on 29.10.2015 submitted letter issued by Mines and Geology
Department indicating that the mine leased area is not a Forest land. The SEAC
should examine the same.
2. The SEAC in its recommendation has given different figures of production. The
lease period is for remaining three years whereas in the conditions the production
18
figures have been given of year wise up to 5 years and sum of production for the
next five years.
3. The mine lease has been granted for 20 years w.e.f. 20.07.1999 up to 10.07.2019.
Therefore the mine is in operation and it is not a new project.
4. The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they have kept-
amount (figures to be given) for reclamation of excavated mine lease area and
shall also ensure that all the environmental safe-guards shall be adopted for
closure of mine.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
***
1
Minutes of the 85th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 09.12.2015, under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 547-549 dated 03.12.2015 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Industrial Unit” (Unit-
VIII) at Plot No-37, Sec-4B, IE, HSIIDC, Dist-Jhajjar, Bahadurgarh,
Haryana by M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority unanimously decided to agree with recommendation of
SEAC and decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining
environmental clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI
dated 09.06.2015 by the project proponent.
Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for “Institutional project” at Village-
Aurangpur, District Jhajjar, Haryana by M/s Xavier Labour Relations
Institute.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent
Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for “Group Housing Complex” at, Village-
Nawada Fatehpur & Naharpur Kasan in Sector-81 & 86, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s International Green Scapes Ltd.
The SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015 has recommended to de-list
this case on the basis of report of sub-committee. The sub-committee visited the site on
2
26.02.2015 reported that due to change in the concept and design the project proponent
has not started the construction work so far and recommended to de-list the case.
Finding no reason to disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the
Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also decided that the decision of the
Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy of the same be
forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O.
MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.
Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Complex at Village
Daulatabad, Sector-103, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Microtek Infratech
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015 has recommended to de-list
this case on the basis of report of sub-committee. The sub-committee visited the site on
26.02.2015 reported that due to change in the concept and design the project proponent
has not started the construction work so far and recommended to de-list the case.
Finding no reason to disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the
Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also decided that the decision of the
Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy of the same be
forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O.
MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.
Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for w.r.t Expansion of Ware House at
Village Behrampur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s P.D.Enterprises.
The recommendation of SEAC in its 89th meeting held on 26.08.2013 to grant
environmental clearance to this project was considered by SEIAA in its 60th, 68th, 72nd,
76th and 80th meeting held on 07.11.2013, 19.03.2014, 25.06.2014, 13.10.2014 and
22.01.2015 wherein, the representative of the project proponent again failed to submit the
copy of validated CLU/approved building plan. The Authority decided to refer back this
case to SEAC with the advice to inspect the site and to verify the status of construction.
Accordingly the case was referred back to SEAC, due to lapse of term of SEIAA the case
was transferred to MoEF&CC, GoI. No action was taken by MoEF&CC, GoI and the
case was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.
The SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015 considered this project
wherein, the request for exemption as per amended notification 22.12.2014 as submitted
by the project proponent vide letter dated 09.10.2015 was discussed. The SEAC decided
that SEIAA may seek clarification from the MoEC & CC, GoI regarding requirement of
environment clearance in view of amended notification dated 22.12.2014 in this case.
The observation of SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI regarding
requirement of environmental clearance in view of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the
in the similar cases of warehouse projects in the same meeting the SEAC has considered
3
the project proposal for grant of environment clearance. The Authority was of the view
that the stand alone warehouse projects are required to seek prior environmental
clearance under EIA, Notification and are not exempted. It was also found that the
MoEF&CC, GoI has also vide letter dated 20.11.2015 has clarified that the warehouse
projects are not exempted from obtaining environmental clearance in view of amended
Notification no. S.O. 3252 (E) dated 22.12.2014.
In view of the above discussions it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to inspect the site and to verify the status of construction and send the
recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification.
Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Industrial Building for
testing of vehicles (R & D Centre) at Plot No. 1, Sector-33 B-33C IMT,
Rohtak by M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with recommendation of SEAC and
decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental
clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015
by the project proponent
Item No. [7] Revision in EC for Residential Colony “TDI City” located at Sec-58,
59, 60, 61, 63 & 64 Sonepat-Kundli, Haryana by M/s TDI
Infrastructure Ltd.
The case was considered by SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015. The
SEAC observed that the EAC of MoEF, GoI in its 150th meeting held on 29 to 31, July
2015 considered this case for finalization of TOR (F.no.21-98/2015-IA.III) and decided
to have site visit but site visit report is not available in the records. The SEAC has
requested SEIAA to obtain the site visit report from MoEF&CC, GoI in this case.
The observation of SEAC was considered on the today’s meeting. It was noticed
that the EAC of MoEF&CC, GoI deferred the proposal for finalization of TOR in its
150th meeting with the following remarks:
The EAC observed that a huge amount of traffic from the project site opens straight way
in to already congested National Highway No.1. There is no access to slip road and there
appears to be a lack of perspective traffic planning. The Committee recommended a site
visit by Dr. Anuradha Shukla, Member, Expert Appraisal Committee (Infrastructure &
CRZ) to work out the access road planning so that traffic from the proposed township
does not affect the traffic on National Highway-I.
4
The Authority decided to return the file to SEAC with the advice to obtain the site
visit report from the MoEF&CC, GoI Expert Member Dr. Anuradha Shukla at their own
level.
Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Affordable Group
Housing” (5.0 acres) at Village Dhunela, Sector-35, Sohna, District
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Tulsiani Construction and Developers Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Affordable Group Housing” (5.0 acres) at Village Dhunela, Sector-35, Sohna, District
Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 20234 sqm (5 acres). The total built up area
shall be 47900.35 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise Residential units (850 DU),
Commercial area, Community Building, Educational Facility (1 no. of Anganwadi). The
maximum height of the building shall be 50 meter. The total water requirement shall be
640 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 403 KLD. The waste water generation
shall be 524 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 625 KLD capacity. The total
power requirement shall be 6007 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 20.29% of project area (15.39% tree
plantation + 4.90% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2296 kg/day. The bio-
degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology.
The total parking spaces proposed are 490 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was noticed that the project proponent has given undertaking stating that no construction
shall be raised in the ROW reserved for HT line. It was also noticed that the project
proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for
collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.29% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
5
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Food Manufacturing
Unit” at Plot No. 4, 5, 6 & 7, Sector-30A, Industrial Estate, HSIIDC,
IMT Rohtak Haryana by M/s Lotte India Corporation Ltd.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority accepted the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent
Item No. [10]Environmental Clearance for proposed group housing project
“Ashiana Anmol” at Village Dhulena, Sector-33, Tehsil Sohna &
District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Universe Heights (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of group
housing project “Ashiana Anmol” at Village Dhulena, Sector-33, Tehsil Sohna & District
Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 53975 sqm (13.33 acres). The total built up area
shall be 141090 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 13 Residential Blocks, 01
Commercial Block, 01 EWS Block and 02 Schools, Club House, shops (15 nos.) etc. The
proposed project shall have 1 Basement + maximum 14 floors, 780 MDU and 138 EWS
units. The maximum height of the building shall be 49.65 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 827 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 464 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 623 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 650 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 6809 KW which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 39.55% of project
area (24.55% tree plantation + 15% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 12 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2511 kg/day.
The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate
technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 1404 ECS.
6
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was noticed that the project proponent has
given undertaking stating that no construction shall be raised in the ROW reserved for
HT line. It was observed that the project proponent has not earmarked the space for solid
waste management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to
submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 39.55% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[3] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[4] The project proponent shall submit plan depicting the area ear marked for
composting.
[5] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
Item No. [11]Environmental Clearance for proposed “Warehouse Project” at
revenue estate of Village Binola, Manesar, District Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s India Land & Space Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has referred this case to the SEIAA with the recommendation for
initiating legal action in view of the MoEF&CC, GoI OM no. J-11013/41/2006-1A.II(I)
dated 12.12.2012. The SEAC has considered the project proposal in its 120th meeting
held on 06.11.2015 and noticed that the project proponent has already completed the
construction of the “warehouse project” without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance
which amounts to violation of EIA Notification dated 14-09-2006. The project proponent
submitted the copy of resolution ensuring that violation of provisions of the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986 will not be repeated in future and also admitted its mistake for
carrying out construction without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance.
7
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC in this case was examined. It
was noticed that the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal in OA. No. 37 of 2015 and 213 of
2014 in the matter of S.P. Muthuraman V/s Union of India & Others on 07.07.2015 has
quashed the operation of MoEF&CC, GoI OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II (1) dated 12-
12-2012 and MoEF, GoI OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 27.06.2013. It was
noticed that MoEF & CC, GoI has not issued any fresh guidelines in view of the quashing
of OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013 by Hon’ble NGT.
In view of the above observations it was decided that:
[2] The Principal Secretary Environment may be requested to issue directions under
Section 5 of EPA Act, 1986 to the project proponent in respect of violations, as
per the requirement of MoEF, GoI, OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated
27.06.2013.
[3] Giving reference of NGT orders; the SEIAA may seek clarification/advice of
MoEF&CC, GoI regarding operation of MoEF&CC, GoI OM No. J-11013/41/2006-
IA.II (1) dated 12-12-2012 and MoEF, GoI, OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)
dated 27.06.2013.
Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony at village
Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of the SEIAA held on
29.10.2015 wherein, it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the project
proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15
days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also
submit plan earmarking space for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
[1] The Principal Secretary Environment may be requested to initiate credible action
on the violation by invoking powers under Section 19 of the Environment
(Protection)Act,1986, for taking necessary legal action under Section 15 of the Act
for the period for which the violation has taken place, against the M/s India Land
& Space Logistics Pvt. Ltd, RZ-279 (A-55), Mahipalpur Extension, NH-8, New
Delhi for commencing construction of Warehouse Project” at revenue estate of
Village Binola, Manesar, District Gurgaon, Haryana without obtaining prior
Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification14-09-2006. The Principal
Secretary Environment may also be requested to provide the evidence of
credible action taken against the project proponent.
8
[2] The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the plan depicting area clearly ear marked for
composting.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 20.11.2015 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted
details of solid waste management, earmarking space on the plan for treatment of bio-
degradable waste and undertaking stating that no construction has been raised at the site
with photograph.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30.8% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[3] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
Item No. [13]Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
located in the revenue estate of Village Sohna, Sector-2 of Sohna,
District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Shree Vardhman Developers Pvt.
Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of the SEIAA held on
29.10.2015 wherein, it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the project
proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15
days or before next meeting.
[1] The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also
submit plan earmarking space for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for
composting.
[3] The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan indicating
dimension of entry and exit ramp of basement.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 27.11.2015 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted
details of solid waste management, earmarking space on the plan for treatment of bio-
degradable waste and revised traffic circulation plan showing 4 meter wide entry and exit
ramp of basement.
9
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 32.52% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[3] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
*****
1
Minutes of the 86th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 12.01.2016, under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 2-4 dated 08.01.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance in respect of IT Compelx at Plot No. 287-288,
Udyog Vihar, Phase- II, Gurgaon by M/s PCI Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to the project
was considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent on 26.11.2012 submitted application for seeking
environment clearance for the project. The project proposal was taken up by
SEAC in its 78th, 85th, 89th, & 106th meetings held on 26.03.2013, 24.06.2013,
27.08.2013 & 17.06.2014. The SEAC observed that the project proponent has
started the construction without obtaining prior environment clearance thus
violated the provision of EIA Notification. The project proponent also submitted
certified true copy of resolution dated 26.06.2013 admitting that the mistake for
starting construction without obtaining prior environment clearance and also
ensuring that the violation shall not be repeated in future; as per the requirement of
MoEF&CC, GoI, OM no. J-11013/41/2006-1AII(I) dated 12.12.2012. The SEAC
recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent.
2. The recommendation of SEAC was considered in the 73rd meeting held on
18.07.2014. The SEIAA decided to refer this case to Principal Secretary
Environment for initiating legal action against the project proponent as per
prescribed procedure. The SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2014/1078 dated
06.08.2014 requested Principal Secretary Environment to initiate legal action
against the project proponent under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and send
credible action taken report.
3. The project proponent filed an application in the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High
Court “CRM-M-30394 of 2013” during hearing this case on 09.10.2015. The
SEIAA came to know that legal action has already been initiated by RO, HSPCB
prior to submission of application by the project proponent for environment
clearance but intimation to the same was not given to SEIAA.
4. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court on 09.10.2015 passed directions to
decide the application of the project proponent within 3 months. The case was
referred to SEAC for appraisal. The SEAC considered this case in its 121st
2
meeting held on 19.11.2015 and recommended this case for environmental
clearance.
5. The SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already
sought clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in
violation cases keeping in view the quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble
NGT but no response from the MOEF & CC, GOI has been received.
6. It was also observed that Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 24.09.2015 in CA
No. 7191-7192/2015 in the matter of “M/s Dugar Housing Ltd V/s
S.P.Muthuraman & Ors has stayed the operation of impugned judgment (s) and
order (s) passed by Hon’ble NGT.
In view of the above observations it was decided to defer the case to the next
meeting with the decision that:
i. Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier
communication dated 28.12.2015 of this office, the MOEF & CC, GOI may
again be requested to send necessary clarification in the matter so as to enable
the SEIAA to take appropriate action in violation cases well within the
stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification/guidelines, in order to avoid
any litigation.
ii. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court may be apprised of the factual
position of this case. A request may also be made to extend the deadline of
three months period (09.01.2016) for further two months in view of the
explained circumstances.
Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Colony located at
Revenue Estate of Village Nuna Majra, Sector-37, Bahadurgarh,
Haryana by M/s HL Promoters Pvt Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Nuna Majra, Sector-37,
Bahadurgarh, Haryana on a total plot area of 66494.8 sqm (16.43). The total built up area
shall be 140796.597 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 07 Blocks, Block-1 (4
Towers + GF + Stilt + 14 Floors), Block-2 (3 Tower + GF + Stilt + 14 Floors), Block-3
(2 Towers + GF + Stilt +14 Floors), Block-4 (1 Tower + Stilt + 6 Floors), Block-5 (1
Tower + GF+ Stilt + 14 Floors), Block-6 (3 Towers + GF + Stilt + 14 floors), Block-7 (2
Tower + GF + 7 Floors), Community building, Nursery Schools & Primary School etc.
The proposed project shall have 1352 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the
building shall be 51 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1000 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 617 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 740 KLD,
which will be treated in the 2 STPs of 675 KLD & 200 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 12067 KVA which will be supplied by UHBVN. The Project
3
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 30% of project area (25% tree
plantation + 5% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 16 rain water
harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 3315.3 kg/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste
converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x 4M. The total parking spaces
proposed are 1653 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, HT Line, water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the
assurance of HUDA for supply of water and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
It was noticed that the project proponent has proposed parking in the ROW reserved for
HT line. The project proponent submitted revised parking plan showing no
parking/proposed construction in the ROW reserved for HT Line. It was observed that the
project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan
for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[3] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[5] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
4
Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Colony
located at Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh
Complex, Haryana by M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has forwarded this case with the recommendation to seek clarification
from MOEF & CC, GOI regarding applicability of EIA Notification in the existing
project of project proponent. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting and it was observed that:
1. The project proponent submitted application for expansion of Group Housing
Colony for construction of Group Housing on the additional license of 2.667 acres.
The license to the existing Group Housing Colony was granted in the year 1984
and 1995 measuring 30.35 Acres. The drawing/building plan of 30.35 acre was
sanction/approved in the year 1985.
2. The SEAC considered the exemption letter dated 13.01.2011 of RO, MOEF & CC,
GOI submitted by the project proponent mentioning that more than 45% of built
up area of the colony was completed and 9.36% of the total built up area was
above the plinth level prior to issuance of Notification dated 07.7.2004 and
therefore, the said colony neither attracts the provisions of 07.07.2004 nor EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006 and no environmental clearance is required from
MOEF & CC, GOI/SEIAA for the existing colony. The SEAC was of the view
that only 45% of built up area was completed and 9.36% of total built up area was
above plinth level prior to Notification dated 07.07.2004. This means that
remaining built up area might have been completed after 13.01.2011 without
obtaining environment clearance.
3. The project proponent vide letter dated 06.12.2015 has requested for with-drawl
of present application. The project proponent has informed that he will submit
separate online application for additional 2.662 acres. The project proponent has
informed to develop independent group housing on 2.662 acres of land and shall
provide separate services in the unit.
4. The date of start of construction, date of completion of structure up to plinth level
and date of completion of project was not available in the records with
authenticated proof for ascertaining the applicability of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 in the existing project.
In view of the above observations it was decided that to defer the case to the next
meeting with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to furnish below
mentioned information within 10 days or before the next meeting of SEIAA.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the date of start of construction, date of
completion of structure up to plinth level and date of completion of project with
authenticated proof for ascertaining the applicability of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 in the existing project.
5
Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for proposed expansion (Phase II) of “SRM
University” situated at Plot No. 39, Rajiv Gandhi Education City,
Sonipat, Haryana by SRM Institute of Science & Technology.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for the service/Maintenance and Training
Facility for customers from Defence Forces and DRDO labs including
inspection, calibration and maintenance services project in the
industrial estate of plot no. 916, Sector-68, IMT, Faridabad, Haryana
by M/s Tata Power Company Ltd.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP/CETP Project at
Village Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana
by Public Health Engineering Division.
The SEAC has forwarded the case with the request to write a letter to HSPCB to
conduct comprehensive study of discharge in sewer and the drain to ascertain whether
this case is of STP or CETP. The case was considered in the today’s meeting. The
Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent on 26.02.2015 submitted application for seeking clearance
for the project under item no. 7(h) of schedule of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 for setting up of CETP. The project proponent has submitted
application in compliance to the Hon’ble NGT.
6
2. The project proponent claims that they intend to set up STP to treat sewage. This
activity is not covered under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and
environmental clearance is not required. However the SEAC is of the opinion that
to ascertain whether this case is of STP or CETP a comprehensive study of
discharge in sewer and drain be got connected from HSPCB.
3. The Hon’ble NGT in application no. 124 of 2013 in the matter of “Kehar Singh
V/s State of Haryana” has clearly passed directions to the applicant. The relevant
part of directions (para 48 of order dated 12.09.2013) is reproduced as under:
“We direct the respondent to seek EC from SEIAA at the earliest and in any
case not later than one month from today. We further direct SEIAA to process the
application and complete the entire exercise of granting clearance conditional or
otherwise-or refusing the same within two months thereafter. In the
circumstances of the case, we would not direct removal of the plant to the extent
to which it has already been constructed at the site as all acts done so far and
that may be done hereafter would be subject to the grant of EC to the projects in
question by the competent authority.”
The project proponents in compliance to the Hon’ble NGT order vide letter
no. 14658 dated 04.10.2013 submitted application for environmental clearance.
The SEIAA vide letter no. 1187 dated 07.11.2013 returned the application as the
same was found in-complete. Now the applicant has submitted application under
item no. 7(h) of schedule of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
4. The SEIAA cannot ask HSPCB to conduct study as opined by SEAC. It is
responsibility of the project proponent and their consultant to get the study
conducted.
In view of the above observations the Authority decided to refer back this case to
SEAC with the advice to appraise this project under item no. 7(h) as submitted by the
applicant and send clear cut recommendation to the SEIAA within stipulated period as
prescribed in the Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for Institutional Project located at Village
Bhupani, Faridabad, Haryana by Satyug Darshan Trust.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
7
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Commercial Complex at
Village-Pawala Khusrupur, Sector-109, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Citra Properties Ltd. The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Complex at Village-Pawala Khusrupur, Sector-109, Gurgaon, Haryana on a
total plot area of 23876.42 sqm (5.90 acre). The total built up area shall be 85458.21 sqm.
The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 basements + GF + maximum 20 floors. The
maximum height of the building shall be 90.9 meter. The total water requirement shall be
398 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 225 KLD. The waste water generation
shall be 216 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 250 KLD capacity. The total
power requirement shall be 5850 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 5052.27 sqmt (25.47%) of project area
(1797.09 sqmt tree plantation + 702.21 sqmt avenue plantation + 2552.97 sqmt lawn
area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 06 rain water harvesting pits. The
solid waste generation will be 1465 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in
the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for
OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 1063 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA
for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for
supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid
waste management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste. It was found that the project proponent has obtained structural stability
certificate issued by BMSF Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd dully signed by certified
registered structural engineer.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 25.47% of total wall area.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
8
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5] The project proponent shall ensure that the plinth level of the building block
to be 1.5 meter above 100 years flood level of the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[6] The project proponent shall obtain NOC from HUDA as well as Irrigation
Department before the start of construction, regarding possible adverse effect
of project proposal on the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[7] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[8] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing Colony
located at Village Atmadpur, Sector-31, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Ozone
GSP Infratech.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony located at Village Atmadpur, Sector-31, Faridabad, Haryana on a total
plot area of 7057.71 sqm (1.744 acre). The total built up area shall be 20734.9 sqm. The
Group Housing project shall have 3 towers with 2 basements + GF + maximum 15
Floors, EWS units, Servant units, Convenient shopping/Commercial and community
center. The Group Housing project shall have 816 Dwelling Units. The maximum height
of the building shall be 49.90 meter. The total water requirement shall be 81 KLD. The
fresh water requirement shall be 47 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 58 KLD,
which will be treated in the STP of 70 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall
be 1014.43 KW which will be supplied by HVPNL. The Project Proponent has proposed
to develop green belt on 2052.91 sqmt (29.08%) of project area (485.48 sqmt tree
plantation + 321.35 sqmt avenue plantation + 62.73 sqmt shrubs plantation + 33.50 sqmt
hedge/ground cover + 1149.85 sqmt lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 02 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 257 kg/day.
The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC
(organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking
spaces proposed are 212 ECS.
9
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc.
The representative of the project proponent submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA
for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC of
airport Authority regarding height clearance and NOC from DFO regarding Non
involvement of Forest land. It was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked
the space for solid waste management site on the plan for collection, segregation and
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 29.08% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for Construction for an Affordable Group
Housing located at Village Badha, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing located at Village Badha, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana on a
total plot area of 21397.72 sqm (5.2875 acres). The total built up area shall be 50004.508
sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 10 Towers, Tower 1 to 7 (Basement + Stilt +
GF + 13 Floors in each tower), Tower 8 to 10 (Basement + Stilt +GF + 3 Floors in each
tower), Commercial Building, Aganwadi etc. The maximum height of the building shall
be 45 meter. The total water requirement shall be 660 KLD. The fresh water requirement
shall be 459 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 553 KLD, which will be treated in
the STP of 670 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3800.14 KVA which
will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt
on 4714.684 sqmt (22.03%) of project area (3152.146 sqmt tree plantation + 1562.538
sqmt landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 06 rain water harvesting
pits. The solid waste generation will be 2388 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be
treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area
required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 485 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
10
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste
management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable
waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 22.03% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
Item No. [11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
(2.5625 acre) located in the Revenue Estate of Village Gurgaon, Sector-
3, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Santur Realtor Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA in its 83rd meeting held on 28.09.2015 decided to refer back this case
to the SEAC for re-appraisal. The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015
considered the reply dated 23.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the
observations as raised by SEIAA as under:-
(i) The SEAC should examine the revise traffic circulation plan submitted by project
proponent vide letter dated 09.03.2015.
(ii) The project proponent shall obtain clarification from the competent authority of
electricity department and shall submit the same to SEAC.
(iii)The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
(iv) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
The SEAC has again recommended this case for environmental clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
reply submitted by project proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.
11
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30.17% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
Item No. [12] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Complex namely “Ansal
Heights” at Sector-92, Village- Wazirpur, Tehsil & Distt. Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/S Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd.
The SEIAA in its 83rd meeting held on 28.09.2015 decided to refer back this case
to the SEAC for re-appraisal. The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015
considered the reply dated 20.10.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the
observations as raised by SEIAA as under:-
(i) The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of
revenue rasta and shall submit the same to SEAC.
(ii) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
(iii) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
The SEAC has again recommended this case for environmental clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
reply submitted by project proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit NOC from Chief Wild Life Warden stating
that the project area does not fall in the area notified as eco-sensitive zone around
Sultanpur National Park Gurgaon before the start of construction.
12
[5] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[6] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
Item No. [13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Hotel Project at Sector-60,
Gurgaon by M/s Toucan Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA in its 83rd meeting held on 28.09.2015 decided to refer back this case
to the SEAC for re-appraisal. The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015
considered the reply dated 20.10.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the
observations as raised by SEIAA as under:-
(i) The project proponent has not obtained the assurance for water supply from
competent authority. The project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to
the SEAC.
(ii) The project proponent shall submit proof of having deposited up to date
EDC/IDC paid to the concerned department to the SEAC.
(iii) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra
number indicated the license.
(iv) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the
project proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted
for treatment of bio-degradable waste.
The SEAC has again recommended this case for environmental clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
reply submitted by project proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall meet the emission standards for Hotel Industry
prescribed by CPCB under schedule-I of rule 3 of Environment (Protection)
Rules, 1986.
13
Item No. [14] Environmental Clearance for Affordable group hosing colony (10
acres) in the revenue estate of village Hayatpur, Sector -90, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Aster Infrahome Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA in its 83rd meeting held on 28.09.2015 decided to refer back this case
to the SEAC for re-appraisal. The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015
considered the reply dated 03.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the
observations as raised by SEIAA as under:-
(i) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra
number indicated the license
(ii) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the
project proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted
for collection of solid waste and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
(iii) The project proponent shall ensure the applicability of standards and codes for
fire and safety.
The SEAC has again recommended this case for environmental clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
reply submitted by project proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 21.54% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
Item No. [15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony project at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Sector-99,
Distt Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 118th meeting held on 04.03.2015 recommended this project for
environmental clearance. In compliance to the Hon’ble NGT order the MoEF&CC, GoI
perused the recommendations of SEAC and raised certain observations. The MoEF&CC,
GoI vide letter dated 14.09.2015 requested to re-appraise the project in term of the
deficiencies as stated in the letter as per the requirement contained in the EIA
Notification 2006. The case was referred to the SEAC to re-appraise the case in terms of
deficiencies as under:-
(i) Out of the total water requirement of 713 kld, 455 kld would be fresh water and
258 kld recycled treated water. The fresh water requirement is to be met through
HUDA municipal supply. However there in no firm commitment of HUDA in
this regard. A letter of commitment be obtained from HUDA.
14
(ii) The project site falls in un-sewered area. The project proponent and SEAC have
mentioned about an arrangement of zero discharge, but how the same will be
achieved in rainy season, has not been clarified.
(iii) One of the specific conditions in recommendations of SEAC, the project
proponent to comply is read as under:-
“Fly ash should be used for building material in the construction as per the
provisions of Fly Ash Notification of September, 1999 and as amended on 22nd
August, 2003”
There is no implementation mechanism proposed by the project proponent in this
regard.
(iv) The project proponent has other projects under implementation in the State, as is
evident from the SEAC minutes of the meeting held on 16th April, 2014.
Compliance status of EC conditions in those projects be filed for further action.
The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015 considered the reply dated
21.10.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and again
recommended this case for environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC along with reply dated 21.10.2015 submitted by
the project proponent was considered in the today’s meeting. It was found that the project
proponent has submitted proof of submission of 6 monthly compliance report but failed
to submit the certified copies of compliance of in respect of (i) Affordable Group
Housing, Sector-84, Gurgaon. (ii) DD Township Group Housing Sector-70 Faridabad.
(iii) Apex Build Well; Group Housing Project, Sector-37C Gurgaon. The project
proponent is required to submit certified copy of compliance report from RO,
MoEF&CC, GoI Chandigarh in respect of the above three projects.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 16.14% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit certified copy of compliance report from RO,
MoEF&CC, GoI, Chandigarh in respect of (i) Affordable Group Housing, Sector-
84, Gurgaon. (ii) DD Township Group Housing Sector-70 Faridabad. (iii)Apex
Build Well; Group Housing Project, Sector-37C Gurgaon within three months
15
period falling which the EC granted shall stand withdrawn without further
intimation.
[5] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
Item No. [16] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Gateway Tower, IT
Park” Project measuring 8.50 acres at Sector-37, Village- Anangpur,
Faridabad, Haryana being developed by M/s Dove Infrastructure Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 recommended this case for
environmental clearance. The SEAC in its recommendations has stated that before
granting EC clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI the obtained as to whether the OM dated
12.12.2012 is applicable or not in view of the stay granted by Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting and the Authority observed that:
1. The project proponent on 30.04.2014 submitted application for environment
clearance for the project as indicated in the subject. On the recommendation of
SEAC the SEIAA vide letter dated 06.08.2014 requested Principal Secretary
Environment to initiate legal action against the project proponent under EPA 1986
as the project proponent had started the construction without obtaining prior
environmental clearance. A request was also made to send credible action taken
report. The Principal Secretary environment vide letter dated 11.03.2015 provided
the evidence of credible action taken against the project proponent.
2. Due to the lapse term of SEIAA/SEAC the case could not be appraised and
transferred to MoEF&CC, GoI. No action taken by MoEF&CC, GoI and the case
was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.
3. The SEIAA vide letter SEIAA/HR/2015/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already
requested Joint Secretary MoEF&CC, GoI to provide necessary clarification in the
matter so as to enable the SEIAA to take appropriate action in violation cases.
In view of the above observations it was decided to defer the case to the next
meeting with the decision that:
(i) Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier
communication dated 28.12.2015 of this office, the MOEF & CC, GOI may
again be requested to send necessary clarification in the matter so as to enable
the SEIAA to take appropriate action in violation cases well within the
stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification/guidelines, in order to avoid
any litigation.
16
Item No. [17] Environmental Clearance for “Expansion of Commercial Complex” at
Sector-65, Badshahpur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Prajakta Colonizers
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Expansion of Commercial Complex” at Sector-65, Badshahpur, Gurgaon, Haryana with
the proposal as given under.
Particulars Existing Area
(EC Granted)
Expansion Area
(EC Required)
Total Area
Plot area 22864.83 sqm
(5.656 acre)
No change 22864.83 sqm
(5.656 acre)
Ground coverage achieved 6110.68 sqmt 250.57 sqmt 6361.295 sqmt
FAR achieved 32144.745 sqm 122.2 sqmt 32267.001 sqmt
Total Built up Area 60168.659 sqmt 271.396 sqmt 60440.055 sqmt
Total no. of Floors G+5 1 Floor G+6
Number of Blocks 3 -1 2
Height 26 meter 4 meter 30 meter
Green Area (27%) 4888.96 sqmt No change 4888.96 sqmt
Parking 646 ECS
Total Water Requirement 334 KLD -20 KLD 314 KLD
Fresh Water 231 KLD -78 KLD 153 KLD
Waste Water 114 KLD 55 KLD 169 KLD
STP 140 KLD 60 KLD 200 KLD
Power (DHBVN) 3059 KW 563.52 KW 3622.52 KW
RWH 3 pits 2 pits 5 pits
Solid waste 734 kg/day 41 kg/day 775 kg/day
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
and status of compliance of conditions imposed in the EC letter. It was also noticed that
the project proponent has proposed to dispose of Bio-degradable waste to MSW site. The project
proponent is required to submit assurance for the same. It was also noticed that the license
granted by Town and Country Planning Department has lapsed on 07.11.2015 and the project
proponent is required to submit copy of validated license.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice. It was also decided
that the EC shall be issued only after the submission of copy of validated license and
assurance of competent Authority for disposal of MSW at the designated site.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 27% of total wall area.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
17
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5] The project proponent shall submit copy of validated license and assurance of
competent Authority for disposal of MSW at the designated site.
Item No. [18] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing at Sector-99A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Prime Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Affordable Group Housing” at Sector-99A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,
Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 24104 sqm. The total built up area shall be
52104.76 sqm. The proposed Project shall have 03 Blocks, Stilt + maximum 12 floors.
The proposed project shall have 816 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the
building shall be 38.950 meter. The total water requirement shall be 582 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 379 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 494 KLD,
which will be treated in the STP of 595 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall
be 4500 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to
develop green belt on 9222.14 sqmt of project area (5981.93 sqmt tree plantation +
3240.210 sqmt landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water
harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2.16 Ton/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste
converter). The area required for OWC will be 100 sqm. The total parking spaces
proposed are 409 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste
management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable
waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 9222.14 sqmt of the project
area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
18
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
Item No. [19] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
(10 acres) allot ed by HUDA, Faridabad at Rojka Meo Industrial
Estate, District Mewat, Haryana by M/s MMTC PAMP India Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Project (10 acres) allotted by HUDA, Faridabad at Rojka Meo Industrial Estate,
District Mewat, Haryana on a total plot area of 40480 sqm. The total built up area shall
be 28920 sqm. The proposed Project shall have 14 Blocks, GF + Maximum 08 Floors,
157 DU. The maximum height of the building shall be 29 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 210 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 108 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 129 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 155 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 874 KW which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 39% of project
area (20% tree plantation + 19% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 10 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 0.56 Ton/day.
The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of Bio-
Mechanical Composting. The area required for Bio-Mechanical Composting will be 3M x
4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 5723.298 sqmt.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the
project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water and NOC from
Forest Department regarding non involvement of Forest land. It was observed that the
project proponent has not earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the
plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice..
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 39% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[3] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing
rules/norms.
19
Item No. [20] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony Project at Village Dhorka, Sector-95, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Ramsons Organics Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony Project at Village Dhorka, Sector-95, District-
Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 19600.96641 sqm (4.8435 acres). The total built
up area shall be 45975.331 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 7 Block (A-G)
Residential and Commercial building. The maximum height of the building shall be
48.15 meter. The total water requirement shall be 567 KLD. The fresh water requirement
shall be 363 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 479 KLD, which will be treated in
the STP of 575 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 7000 KVA which
will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt
on 21.5% of project area (15% plantation + 6.5% landscaping). The Project Proponent
proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be
2137.49 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting
appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 504 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste
management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable
waste but the detail of technology for treatment of bio-degradable waste are not discussed
and dimensions of the reserved area not given.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice. The EC shall be
submitted subject to the submission of details of technology to be adopted for treatment
of bio-degradable waste in the project area along with the dimensions of area earmarked
for management of solid waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 21.5% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
20
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit detail of technology for treatment of bio-
degradable waste and dimensions of the area reserved for management of solid
waste.
Item No. [21] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony project at Village Naurangpur, Sector-79, 79B, Distt Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Revital Reality Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony Project at Village Naurangpur, Sector-79, 79B, Distt.
Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 48967.01 sqm (12.10 acres). The total built up
area shall be 146757.47 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 15 Towers +
Basement + GF + maximum 17 Floors, Commercial (Mumty +Water tank),
Anganwadi/Community. The maximum height of the building shall be 55.285 meter. The
total water requirement shall be 1424 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 903
KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1237 KLD, which will be treated in the 2 STPs
of 1180 KLD & 307 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 7015 KW
which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop
green belt on 10277.354 sqm (20.99%) of project area (7345.05 sqm plantation + 2932.3
sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 12 rain water harvesting
pits. The solid waste generation will be 5331.977 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will
be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area
required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 1093 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA
for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for
supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon
regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height
clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid
waste management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
21
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.99% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[5] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
Item No. [22] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project at
Sector-2, Tehsil-Sohna & District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ashiana
Dwellings Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly M/s PSL Infratech Pvt. Ltd)
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Nuna Majra, Sector-37,
Bahadurgarh, Haryana on a total plot area of 41480.27 sqm (10.25 acre). The net planned
area is 35279.28 sqm (8.717 acre). The total built up area shall be 118863 sqm. The
proposed Project shall have 10 Residential Towers, 01 EWS Tower, 01 Commercial
Block, Community Building and Educational Building. The project will have 660 MDU,
117 EWS and 70 Servant units. The maximum number of floors shall be Basement + GF
+ 18 Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 65 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 698 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 414 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 540 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 620 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 5537 KW which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 30.29% of project
area (20.28% tree plantation + 10.01% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 10 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2261.37
kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of
OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 100 sqm. The total
parking spaces proposed are 1266 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA
22
for supply of water and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was observed that
the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the
plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste. It was found that
the project proponent has obtained structural stability certificate issued by TPC Technical
Projects Consultants (P) Ltd. dully signed by registered structural engineer.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30.29% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
Item No. [23] Application for extension of validity period of Environment Clearance
for Group Housing and Colony for construction of group housing
colony project at Sector-5 Dharuhera Dist. Rewari, Haryana by M/s
Elite Homes Pvt. Ltd.
The application of project proponent seeking extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter along with representation submitted by the project
proponent was considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:
1. The MoEF&CC, GoI on 08.01.2008 granted environmental clearance to the
project proponent. The project proponent has submitted application for extension
of validity on 29.12.2014/25.02.2015. No action was taken due to lapse of term of
SEIAA. The case was transferred to MoEF&CC, GoI no action was taken and the
same was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.
2. The MoEF&CC, GoI vide letter dated 05.10.2015 has advised the project
proponent to seek fresh Environmental Clearance as the case is time bar.
3. The project proponent on 24.11.2015 and 08.12.2015 submitted representation to
considered grant extension of validity of EC keeping in view the amendment to
the Principal Notification dated 29.04.2015, wherein the validity of EC had been
extended from 5 to 7 year and also clarified that the MoEF&CC, GoI while issuing
the letter dated 05.10.2015 has not taken in to consideration the amended
notification extending validity period from 5 years to 7 years.
4. This office of SEIAA vide letter dated 18.12.2015 forwarded the representation of
project proponent and sought clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI whether project
proposal qualifies for consideration in view of amendment to the notification or
not. Again on 31.12.2015 a reminder was issued but clarification from
MoEF&CC, GoI is still awaited.
23
5. In the similar case, Regional office Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate
Change, Chandigarh vide letter no. F.No. 4-625/2009-RO(NZ) dated 17.07.2015
has extended the validity of environment clearance granted to M/s Energetic
Construction Pvt. Ltd. by SEIAA, Haryana vide letter no. DEH/08/SEAC-15/6-8
dated 23.01.2009 from 5 years to 7 years i.e. up to 22.01.2016.
6. The environmental clearance to the project proponent was granted by MoEF&CC,
GoI vide F.No. 21-409/2007-IA.III dated 08.01.2008. The validity of EC as per
amended notification dated 29.04.2015 was up to 07.01.2015. The project
proponent on 25.02.2015 submitted the complete application for extension of
validity of EC. The project proponent has completed about 60% of the
construction.
7. The Director of the company also submitted an undertaking on 24.11.2015 that no
construction after the expiry of the validity of EC has been raised.
In view of the above observations the Authority decided to grant extension of
validity of environmental clearance for further 7 years with effect from 07.01.2015
subject to compliance of the conditions imposed in the environmental clearance letter
issued by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 08.01.2008.
********
1
Minutes of the 87th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 05.02.2016, under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 82-84 dated 03.02.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance in respect of IT Compelx at Plot No. 287-288,
Udyog Vihar, Phase- II, Gurgaon by M/s PCI Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to grant Environmental Clearance to this project
was taken up for consideration in the last meeting of SEIAA held on 12.01.2016 and the
case was deferred to the next meeting with the decision that:
i. Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier
communication dated 28.12.2015 of this office, the MOEF & CC, GOI may
again be requested to send necessary clarification in the matter so as to enable
the SEIAA to take appropriate action in violation cases well within the
stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification/guidelines, in order to avoid
any litigation.
ii. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court may be apprised of the factual
position of this case. A request may also be made to extend the deadline of
three months period (09.01.2016) for further two months in view of the
explained circumstances.
In the today’s meeting the case was examined in the light of Hon’ble Supreme
court orders dated 22.01.2016, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has modified its
orders (regarding stay on operation of Hon’ble NGT orders) passed in CA No. 7191-
7192/2015 in the matter of “M/s Dugar Housing Ltd V/s S.P.Muthuraman & Ors.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided that Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana
High Court may be apprised of the factual position of this case and a request may also be
made to extend the deadline of three months period (09.01.2016) till final orders are
passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case.
Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Colony
located at Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh
Complex, Haryana by M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendations of SEAC, to seek clarification from MoEF & CC, GoI
regarding applicability of EIA Notification 14.09.2006, in the existing case was taken up
for consideration in the last meeting of SEIAA held on 12.01.2016 and the case was
deferred to the next meeting with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to
furnish below mentioned information
2
[1] The project proponent shall submit the date of start of construction, date of
completion of structure up to plinth level and date of completion of project with
authenticated proof for ascertaining the applicability of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 in the existing project.
In the today’s meeting the letter dated 21.01.2016 giving details as submitted by
the project proponent was taken up for discussions. The perusal of the record submitted
by the project proponent revealed that the project proponent had completed the
construction of the existing Group Housing during year 1984 to 2005. The construction
up to plinth level had been completed prior to 07.07.2004 Notification. The Authority
was of the unanimous view that the provisions of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 are
not attracted to the instant Group Housing project.
In view of the above discussions the Authority accepted the request of project
proponent for withdrawal of their application submitted for expansion of Group Housing
project. The Authority also granted permission to the project proponent to submit fresh
online application for development of independent Group Housing project on 2.662 acre
of additional licensed area.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Gateway Tower, IT Park”
Project measuring 8.50 acres at Sector-37, Village- Anangpur,
Faridabad, Haryana being developed by M/s Dove Infrastructure Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 recommended this case for
environmental clearance. The SEAC in its recommendations has stated that before
granting EC clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI the obtained as to whether the OM dated
12.12.2012 is applicable or not in view of the stay granted by Hon’ble Supreme Court of
India. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up in the last meeting of SEIAA held on
12.01.2016 and it was decided to defer the case to the next meeting with the decision that:
(i) Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier communication
dated 28.12.2015 of this office, the MOEF & CC, GOI may again be requested to
send necessary clarification in the matter so as to enable the SEIAA to take
appropriate action in violation cases well within the stipulated period as prescribed
in the Notification/guidelines, in order to avoid any litigation.
In the today’s meeting the case was examined in the light of Hon’ble Supreme
court orders dated 22.01.2016, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has modified its
orders (regarding stay on operation of Hon’ble NGT orders) passed in CA No. 7191-
7192/2015 in the matter of “M/s Dugar Housing Ltd V/s S.P.Muthuraman & Ors. The
Authority was also informed that clarification sought by SEIAA from MoEF &CC, GoI is
still awaited. The Authority decided to keep this case in abeyance till clarification is
received from MoEF & CC, GoI.
3
Item No. [4] Revised EC Proposed Group Housing Project “The Ultima” (22.231
acres) at Sector-81, Village-Lakhnola, Gurgaon by M/s DLF Homes
Developers Ltd.
1. The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to this project
was taken up for consideration in the 83rd meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
(i) The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of
revenue rasta and shall submit the same to SEAC.
(ii) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
(iii)The height of building is 96.85 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance
from the recognized institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering
College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for
fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The
project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.
2. The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 22.12.2015 considered the reply dated
16.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and
again recommended this case for environmental clearance.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration. It was noticed that a committee constituted by SEIAA to monitor the
compliance of conditions inspected the site and found that adequate measures for
treatment of waste water/sewage generated from the labour camp has not been provided
by the project proponent. The HSPCB has also issued show cause notice to the project
proponent under section 33A of the water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1974,
under Section 31A of Air ((Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1981. It was observed
by the Authority that a condition in the EC letter has been imposed for providing mobile
toilets for labour. The project proponent has informed that the sewage generated at labour
camp of the project site is being managed by treatment in the operational STP of their
Group Housing project, New Town Heights, Sector-86, Gurgaon. It was also observed
that the project proponent vide letter dated 21.01.2016 has assured to install Sewage
Treatment Plant (STP) in the labour camp area for which necessary work order has been
placed. The project proponent has requested for withdrawal of notice.
In view of the above the Authority decided that the environmental clearance to the
project proponent shall be issued only after the confirmation regarding installation of STP
in the labour camp area is received from the project proponent as per assurance given
vide letter 21.01.2016.
4
Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing located at Sector-70A, Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Pyramid
Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
(i) The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 18% of the project
area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project proponent
shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015 submitted
revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the same.
(ii) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan
showing area ear marked for composting.
(iii) The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
(iv) The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 22.12.2015 considered the reply dated
24.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and again
recommended this case for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was
taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the project
proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-
degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days. .
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.10% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
5
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No. [6] EC for the Expansion and Modernization of DLF Commercial Project
Corporate Green (IT Office, Retail and Studio/Service Apartment) at
Sector-74A, Gurgaon by M/s DLF Universal Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 22.12.2015 has recommended this project
for environment clearance. The project proponent submitted application on 21.10.2014
for seeking environment clearance for the expansion and Modernization of commercial
project at 74 A, Gurgaon. The environmental clearance was granted by SEIAA vide letter
no. DEH/09/SEIAA/23 dated 01.05.2009.
1. The project proponent has proposed the expansion and Modernization of unit as
under:
Details EC Granted Change Proposed
Plot Area 104050.75 sqm
25.7115 Acres
+39076.217 sqm
+ 9.656 Acres
143126.967 sqm
35.3675 Acres
FAR permissible
1.75%
182088.81 sqm +68383.382 sqm 250472.192 sqm
FAR Proposed 181878.07 sqm +63006.187 sqm 244884.258 sqm
Built up area 321300.67 sqm +76742.825 sqm 398043.495 sqm
Service
Apartments
0 +400 nos. 400
Studio Apartments 0 +292 292
Offices 926 nos. +529 nos. 1455 nos.
Shops 48 nos. +58 nos. 106 nos.
Building Height 79.6 meter +13.1 meter 92.7 meter
Total Water
Requirement
1589 KLD +557 KLD 2146 KLD
2. The MoEF &CC, GoI, Chandigarh has issued certified copy of compliance report.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted certified copy of
compliance report issued by MoEF & CC, GoI as per the requirement of procedure
prescribed by MoEF & CC, GoI. The Authority decided that a Sub-Committee
comprising of Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall monitor
the compliance of the conditions imposed in the EC letter and shall submit the report to
the SEIAA. Accordingly the case was deferred.
Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group
Housing Colony” at Village Dhunela, Sector-33, Sohna, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Breez Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Affordable Group Housing Colony”
at Village Dhunela, Sector-33, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of
6
39755.243 sqm. The total built up area shall be 109700.216 sqm. The proposed Project
shall comprise 03 Blocks, 20 Towers, Block-1 Tower 1 to 17 (S + 10 Floors (72589.218
sqm)), Block-2 Tower 18 & 19 (S + 10 Floors (12934 sqm)), Block-3 Tower 20 (S+2
Floors (212.193 sqm)), Commercial (G+1). The maximum height of the building shall be
33.2 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1127 KLD. The fresh water requirement
shall be 769 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 949 KLD, which will be treated in
the STP of 1150 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 5000 KVA which
will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt
on 8298.383 sqm (20.874%) of project area (12.09% tree plantation + 8.784%
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 10 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 3744 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking
spaces proposed are 1011 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding existence of revenuer rasta, gas pipe line, water
requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC
regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse
of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent
submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC
paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage
system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was noticed that the project proponent has
obtained NOC from GAIL regarding ROW reserved for Gas pipe line passing through the
project area. It was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the
capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the
earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.874% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
7
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[5] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
[6] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW reserved
for gas pipeline.
[7] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Baselwa,
Sector-87, District Faridabad, Haryana by M/s SRS Retreat Services
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in.
The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Baselwa, Sector-87, District
Faridabad, Haryana on a total plot area of 20262.335 sqm (5.00694 acre). The total built
up area shall be 48964.137 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 8 Towers, Tower
A1 to Tower A5 and Tower B1 to B2 consisting of Stilt + 14 Floors, Tower C consisting
of Stilt + 4 Floors, Community Hall, Aganwadi etc. The Group Housing project shall
have 818 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be 43.53 meter. The
total water requirement shall be 603 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 405
KLD. The waste water generation shall be 498 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of
600 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3500 KVA which will be
supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on
20.95% of project area (15% tree plantation + 5.95% landscaping). The Project
Proponent proposed to construct 5 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation
will be 2247 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by
installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 450
ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
8
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation
of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for
the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.95% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No. [9] Revision and Expansion of Group Housing Project located at Plot No.
GH-02, Village Sarai Khawaja, Sec-41, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s
Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Expansion of Group Housing Project
located at Plot No. GH-02, Village Sarai Khawaja, Sec-41, Faridabad, Haryana with the
proposal as given under.
Particulars Existing as per EC Total after Revision and
Expansion
Plot area 10670.88 sqm (2.64 acres)
Proposed Ground coverage 2035.712 sqm 2752.85 sqm
Proposed F.A.R 18659.011 18609.03
Total Built up Area 29961.691 sqm 33139.86 sqm
Basement Ares (Non-FAR)
Upper Basement
Lower Basement
11302.68 sqm
4085.289 sqm
7217.391 sqm
12530.71 sqm
5746.04 sqm
6784.67 sqm
Green Area (33%) 3201.264 sqm 3557.681 sqm
Parking 274 ECS 254 ECS
Total Water Requirement 164 KLD 187 KLD
Fresh Water 106 KLD 122 KLD
Waste Water 121 KLD 141 KLD
STP 150 KLD 170 KLD
Power (DHBVN) 2050 KVA
9
RWH 4 pits 3 pits
Solid Waste 566 kg/day 571 kg/day
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan and traffic
circulation plan. It was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the
capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the
earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 33% of project area.
[2] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Extension of EC Cases:
Item No.[10] Extension of Environmental Clearance for the project “Paliwal City”
Township at Sector-38 & 39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s Parsvnath
Developers Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has forwarded this case to
SEIAA for taking decision. It was noticed that the environmental clearance to the project
proponent was accorded by SEIAA on 04.05.2009. The validity of environmental
clearance was up to 03.05.2014(5 years). The project proponent on 28.03.2014 submitted
the application for extension of validity of environmental clearance. It was noticed that
the project proponent has claimed that 60% of construction has been achieved. The
project proponent has submitted copy of valid license and also submitted copy of
certified compliance report issued by MoEF & CC, GoI NZR, Chandigarh. The Sub-
Committee also reported that the project proponent could not complete the construction
after obtaining environment clearance. The case was examined in the light of amended
notification dated 15.04.2015.
Keeping In view the above, the Authority decided to grant extension for validity of
EC for 2 years subject to compliance of the conditions already imposed in the
environmental clearance letter.
10
Item No. [11]Extension of Validity of Environment Clearance for proposed Group
Housing Project “Tulip Ace & Petals” Sector-89, Gurgaon by M/s
Tulip Infratech pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has forwarded this case to
SEIAA for taking decision. It was noticed that the environmental clearance to the project
proponent was granted by MoEF & CC, GoI on 11.07.2008. The validity of the EC was
up to 10.07.2013. The project proponent on 09.07.2013 submitted application seeking
extension of validity of EC. The SEIAA on 03.02.2014 referred to the case to SEAC to
inspect the site in order to access the status of construction. The Sub-Committee on
10.03.2015 visited the site and reported that the construction of project was completed
before 16.10.2013, Consent to establish the project was obtained on 15.01.2011 and
Consent to Operate was obtained on 16.10.2013 from the appropriate Authority.
Therefore, project proponent does not require extension of validity of environment
clearance.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to write to HSPCB as to
how the Consent to Operate was issued on 16.10.2013 without valid environment
clearance letter.
Item No.[12]Extension of Environmental Clearance for Commercial Complex
measuring 4.843 Acres at Sector-66, District Gurgaon by M/s Gentle
Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has forwarded this case to
SEIAA for taking decision. It was noticed that the environmental clearance to the project
proponent was accorded by SEIAA on 01.05.2009. The validity of environmental
clearance was up to 31.04.2014 (5 years). The project proponent on 23.04.2014 submitted
the application for extension of validity of environmental clearance. It was noticed that
the project proponent has claimed that only construction of basement has been done. The
project proponent has submitted copy of valid license and also submitted copy of
certified compliance report issued by MoEF & CC, GoI NZR, Chandigarh. The Sub-
Committee also reported that the project proponent has completed the excavation for
foundations and basement. The project proponent also requested for extension of validity
for their project for 7 years. The case was examined in the light of amended notification
dated 15.04.2015.
Keeping In view the above, the Authority decided to grant extension for validity of
EC for 7 years subject to compliance of the conditions already imposed in the
environmental clearance letter.
Item No.[13]Application for Extension of EC for Group Housing Project “NCR
One” on an area measuring 10.712 Acres at Sector-95, Village
Wazirpur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pashupati Buildwell Pvt. Ltd
(formally known as Pashupati Buildhome Pvt. Ltd.)
The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has forwarded this case to
SEIAA for taking decision. It was noticed that the environmental clearance to the project
11
proponent was accorded by SEIAA on 28.10.2009. The validity of environmental
clearance was up to 27.10.2014 (5 years). The project proponent on 21.10.2014 submitted
the application for extension of validity of environmental clearance. It was noticed that
the project proponent has claimed that out of total built up area of 83456.97 sqm the
80500 sqm of area has been constructed. The project proponent has submitted copy of
valid license and also submitted copy of certified compliance report issued by MoEF &
CC, GoI NZR, Chandigarh. The Sub-Committee also reported that the project proponent
has obtained occupation certificate on 25.11.2014 for 6 nos. of Towers out of proposed
10 nos. of Towers. The case was examined in the light of amended notification dated
15.04.2015.
Keeping In view the above, the Authority decided to grant extension for validity of
EC for 2 years subject to compliance of the conditions already imposed in the
environmental clearance letter.
The Authority also decided to issue show-cause notices to the project proponents
where violation of the conditions of the environment clearances has been reported by the
committee constituted by SEIAA.
****
1
Minutes of the 88th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 29.02.2016 and 01.03.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan
IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA
Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA
Notification dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 121-123 dated 26.02.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
On 29.02.2016:
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for proposed Amarpur Jorasi Stone “along
with associated minor mineral” mining project, Distrct-Mahendergarh,
Haryana by M/s Muneer Enterprises.
The project proposal was taken up for appraisal by SEAC in its 125th meeting held
on 12.01.2016. The project proponent vide letter dated 09.01.2016 informed that
environmental clearance to their project has already been granted by MoEF & CC, GoI
vide letter dated 14.07.2014. Accordingly the SEAC recommended to file the case.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority agree with the recommendation of SEAC decided to file this
case.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT/Cyber Park located at
Industrial Sector 19, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Dominant Offset Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 83rd meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
1. The project proponent shall obtain copy of revalidated license and shall submit the
same to SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
3. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
The SEAC in its 125th meeting held on 13.01.2015 considered the reply dated
24.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and again
recommended this case for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was
taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the project
proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-
degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
2
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days. .
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall maintain a collection center for E-waste and it shall be
disposed of to only registered and authorized dismantler as per existing E-waste
Management Rules 2011.
[5] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of proposed Group Housing
Colony located at Sector-4A, Bahadurgarh, District- Jhajjar, Haryana
by M/s Omaxe Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony located at Sector-4A, Bahadurgarh, District- Jhajjar, Haryana on a total
plot area of 50735.8 sqm (12.537 Acres). The total built up area shall be 111811.6 sqm.
The proposed Project shall comprise of Stilt + 10 floors, 872 Apartments, 154 EWS units,
88 Servant Unit, Commercial, Community Building and Nursery School. The maximum
height of the building shall be 36.925 meter. The total water requirement shall be 785
KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 518 KLD. The waste water generation shall
be 639 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 770 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 6250 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 30% of project area (25.6% tree
plantation + 4.4% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 14 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2570 kg/day. The bio-
degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic
waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x 4M. The total parking spaces
proposed are 1648 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding existence of revenue rasta, HT line, water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of
3
water, parking plan, traffic circulation, NOC from forest etc. It was found that the project
proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water and NOC from AAI
regarding height clearance. It was noticed that the details of calculation of Solid Waste
Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste not discussed and the space
allocated in the project for management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment
of bio-degradable waste not discussed and the space allocated in the project for
management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan within 15 days. .
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the
case may be.
[3] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[4] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
[5] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[6] The project proponent shall submit of details of calculation of Solid Waste
Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste not discussed and
the space allocated in the project for management of solid waste not earmarked
on the plan within 15 days.
Item No.[4] Application for revision and extension of validity of EC of Group
Housing Colony “KLJ Heights” at Vill Kassar, Sector-15,
Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s KLJ Developers Pvt. Ltd.
This case relates to the grant of extension for validity of environmental clearance
letter. The environmental clearance to this project was granted by MoEF & CC, GoI on
19.03.2008. The validity of the EC was up to 18.03.2013. The project proponent on
4
10.09.2014 submitted application for seeking extension of validity and expansion of
project i.e. approximately after 18 months of the expiry of validity of EC.
In the today’s meeting it was found that the SEAC in its meeting held on
11.11.2014 observed that the certified copy of monitoring report dated 30.01.2014
received from MoEF & CC, GoI shows that the construction work is still in progress
whereas the validity of EC was up to 18.03.2013 and any work executed after words
tantamount to violation of EIA Notification. The SEAC also constituted sub-committee to
access the actual status of development. The sub-committee constituted by SEAC visited
the site on 05.01.2016 and reported that construction activity has been done after expiry
of EC.
In view of the above discussions the Authority was of the view that the applicant
has submitted application after the expiry of validity of EC thus this case is time bar case
and no action at this stage can be taken. The Authority decided that the project proponent
may be informed that their application for extension of validity of EC cannot be
considered as it is time bar case and the project proponent is required to submit fresh
application for environmental clearance.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Complex project at
Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar
MGF Land Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Complex project at Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana on a
plot area of 9105.4 sqm (2.25 Acres). The total built up area shall be 36439.033 sqm. The
proposed project shall comprise of 4 Basement + GF + 12 floors. The maximum height of
the building shall be 55.68 meters. The total water requirement shall be 227 KLD. The
fresh water requirement shall be 132 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 100
KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 125 KLD capacity.
In the today’s meeting the detail it was observed by the Authority that:
1. The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of
bio-degradable waste not discussed. The space allocated in the project for
management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.
2. The project proponent has proposed to develop 23.09% of project area under green
belt. The calculations and the plan submitted by the project proponent was not
found in order.
3. The parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project proponent
was not found in order. The project proponent is required to give details of parking
calculations and also indicate the dimensions of internal roads and ramp for entry
and exit from the basements on the plan.
5
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for proposed Ware House for storage of non-
agricultural produce (logistics) in the revenue estate of village Bilaspur
and Pathreri, Distt Gurgaon by M/s Siyat Property Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Ware House for storage of
non-agricultural produce (logistics) in the revenue estate of village Bilaspur and Pathreri,
Distt Gurgaon on a total plot area of 52881.67 sqmt (13.67 Acres). The total built up area
shall be 27259.91 sqmt. The Ware House complex shall have comprised of 4 Blocks,
consisting of GF and Offices. The maximum height of the building shall be 13.89 meter.
The project proponent has proposed to store non-agro based goods which will be non-
explosives non-hazardous & non-chemical in nature. The total water requirement shall be
53 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 37 KLD. The waste water generation shall
be 20 KLD which will be treated in STP of 25 KLD. The total power requirement shall
be 523.75 KVA which will be supplied by HVPNL. The Project Proponent has proposed
to develop green belt on 11096.272 sqm (20.98%) of project area (10880.839 sqm tree
plantation + 215.409% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 07 rain
water harvesting pits with dual bore. The solid waste generation will be 116 kg/day. The
total parking spaces proposed are 8152.83 sqm.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non-
applicability of Aravalli Notification, recycle and reuse of water etc. The representative
of the project proponent submitted NOC issued by DC Gurgaon regarding non-
applicability of Aravalli Notification but the project proponent failed to submit assurance
of competent Authority for supply of fresh water and informed that at present no local
water supply is available near the project area and they have proposed to meet with the 37
KLD of fresh water requirement from water supplier. The representative of the project
proponent also submitted copy of analysis report showing that the water is fit for human
consumption and assured that they will provide RO system for treatment of water to
make it fit for drinking purpose. It was noticed that the project proponent has proposed
that horticulture waste/bio-degradable will be composted in vermin composting pits but
the same is not earmarked on the plan.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
6
submission of plan earmarking space for vermin composting of bio-degradable waste
within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall strengthen and maintain the road in front of the
proposed warehouse at own cost after taking approval from the relevant
authority.
[2] The project proponent shall provide RO System for purification of water making it
fit for drinking purpose.
[3] The project proponent shall store only non-agro, non-polluting, non-Inflammable
and non-Hazardous items /products in the warehouse.
[4] Pollution control measures for oil/diesel waste due to large no of Trucks involved
in transportation shall be made.
[5] The project proponent shall get approval of scheme for firefighting from the
concerned Authority before commissioning the project.
[6] The project proponent shall control fugitive emission due to loading, unloading
and other operations. In no case any truck/other vehicle should be parked on the
road side.
[7] The project proponent shall use only treated water for Horticulture.
[8] The project proponent shall submit plan earmarking space for vermin composting
of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony at
Sector-114, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s KST Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended for initiating action for violation of EIA Notification
on the basis of report of sub-committee. The project proponent on 19.01.2015 submitted
application for obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification 14.09.2006.
The application was transferred to MoEF & CC, GoI in April 2015 due to lapse of the
term of SEIAA and subsequently MoEF & CC, GoI returned the application on
31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA without taking any action.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the SEAC in its 120th meeting held on 06.11.2015 observed
that the project proponent has started the construction work. The sub-committee visited
the site on 02.12.2015 and reported that due to the non-availability of responsible person/
consultant from the project proponent side the detail of status of construction could not be
measures. There was no active construction activity at the site at the time of inspection
however the committee observed that there is substantial excavation in the main project
area in the past to facilitate the road at two corners in the project area. The constructed
structure of brick was with one of tin shed and other of RCC slabs was noticed on the
first floor level of about 100 x 40 feet each. At one of the locations the built up area was
7
being used for commercial purpose and recommended for initiating action for violation of
EIA Notification.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 03.02.2016 has
requested to visit the site again to see the actual position of their project at site as they
could not mobilize their team and co-ordinate with the committee members during the
site visit in a proper way as intimation was received only a day before the site visit.
In view of the above it was decided that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri
Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall inspect the project area site in
order to access the status of construction if any and shall submit the report to the SEIAA.
Accordingly the case was deferred.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of affordable Group Housing
project at Sector-27, Rewari, Haryana by M/s Victory Buildestates Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 125th meeting held on 11.01.2016 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing project at
Sector-27, Rewari, Haryana on a total plot area of 20360.71 sqm (5.03 Acre). The total
built up area shall be 57005.33 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 05
Residential Blocks, Stilt + 11 Floors, 01 Commercial Complex (G+1) and 01 community
Centre. The Group Housing project shall have 792 Dwelling Units. The maximum height
of the building shall be 37.65 meter. The total water requirement shall be 581.7 KLD.
The fresh water requirement shall be 389 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 477
KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 580 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 2887.80 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4194.11 sqm (20.60%) of project area
(2077.4 sqm tree plantation + 2116.71 sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent
proposed to construct 8 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be
2134 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation
of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 950 Two
Wheelers and 9 ECS for Visitors.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation
8
of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for
the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.60% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony at Village Billah, Sector-14, Panchkula, Extension-II,
District Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Green Space Infraheights Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 125th meeting held on 11.01.2016 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Colony at
Village Billah, Sector-14, Panchkula, Extension-II, District Panchkula, Haryana on a total
plot area of 20234.282 sqm (5 Acre). The total built up area shall be 44004.462 sqm. The
Group Housing project shall have Comprise of Stilt + GF + 13 Floors, Community
Building, Guard Room, Meter Room, Community Hall and Stilt area. The Group
Housing project shall have 786 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building
shall be 43.15 meter. The total water requirement shall be 554 KLD. The fresh water
requirement shall be 381 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 469 KLD, which will
be treated in the STP of 570 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 4800
KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop
green belt on 3849.108 sqm (20.66%) of project area (1954.575tree plantation +
1894.533 sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 5 rain water
harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2121 kg/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste
converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 406 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
9
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation
of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for
the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.66% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Padhana,
Sector-16, District Karnal, Haryana by M/s RAS Developments Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 125th meeting held on 11.01.2016 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Colony
located in the revenue estate of Village Padhana, Sector-16, District Karnal, Haryana on a
total plot area of 28352.2 sqm (7 Acre). The total built up area shall be 59712.14 sqm.
The Group Housing project shall have 21 Residential Towers; Tower A-1 to A-8 with GF
+ 13 Floors, B-1 to B-13 with GF + 3 Floors, Commercial Building G+ 3, Community
Building and Aganwadi. The total Dwelling units shall be 1091. The maximum height of
the building shall be 41.89 meter. The total water requirement shall be 829 KLD. The
fresh water requirement shall be 565 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 682
KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 800 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 4691.29 KVA which will be supplied by UHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 5670.44 sqm (20%) of project area
10
(314.80 sqm tree plantation + 5355.614 sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent
proposed to construct 13 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be
2971 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation
of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 547 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation
of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for
the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Project located in the revenue estate of Village Kasba Karnal,
Sector-35, Distt-Karnal, Haryana by M/s Santur Spaces Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 125th meeting held on 11.01.2016 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Project
located in the revenue estate of Village Kasba Karnal, Sector-35, Distt-Karnal, Haryana
on a total plot area of 38485.54 sqm (9.51 Acre). The total built up area shall be
90532.107 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 12 Blocks with GF + 14 Floors,
Commercial Building 1 & 2, Community Hall (G) and Creche (G). The total Dwelling
units shall be 1371. The maximum height of the building shall be 50.35 meter. The total
11
water requirement shall be 1013 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 664 KLD.
The waste water generation shall be 816 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 980
KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 7542 KVA which will be supplied
by UHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 8542.897 sqm
(22.87%) of project area (8121.307 sqm tree plantation + 421.590 sqm landscaping). The
Project Proponent proposed to construct 11 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste
generation will be 3726 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project
area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will
be 3M x 4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 866 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation
of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for
the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 22.87% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for proposed 3 KLPD Grain Based Distillery
Project at Plot No. 358, Sector 3, Phase II, IMT Bawal Industrial
Estate, District Rewari (Haryana) by M/s Piccadily Sugar & Allied
Industries Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord Environmental Clearance by imposing
stipulations as stated therein was taken up in the today’s meeting it was noticed that the
project proponent has proposed to set up 3 KLPD Grain Based Distillery Project at Plot
12
No. 358, Sector 3, Phase II, IMT Bawal Industrial Estate, District Rewari (Haryana). The
TOR was approved in the 113th meeting of SEAC held on 09.10.2014. Public hearing is
exempted as the project is located in the notified Industrial Estate. The project proponent
on the basis of approved TOR submitted EIA/EMP which was taken up for appraisal in
the 125th meeting of SEAC held on 11.01.2016. The SEAC recommended this case for
environmental clearance under item no. 5 (g) of schedule as category B-1.
It was noticed that the main raw material required for the Distillery unit will be
broken/damaged Grains/Barley which are available in the local area the plot area is 1.945
acre. The process involved is Grain storage, Milling and Grain Flour handling, Slurry
Preparation and liquefaction, Fermentation, Decantation and Multi-effect evaporation.
The proposed Distillery unit would be based on “Zero Liquid Discharge”. All the major
source of Air Pollution will be provided with Multi-Cyclone with stack of adequate
height to maintain particulate matter emissions. The water requirement is 36 KLD. Boiler
ash will be sold to bricks manufacturers/ cement unit. DWGS will be sold as cattle feed.
It was observed that the project proponent has earmarked budget for CSR and the project
proponent has also submitted the details of expenditure to be incurred in respect of CSR.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to accept the
recommendations of SEAC and to accord environmental clearance for setting up 3 KLPD
Grain Based Distillery under item no. 5 (g) of schedule as category B-1 with the
following Specific and General Conditions for strict compliance by the project proponent.
Specific Conditions:
[1] Distillery unit shall be based on Grain based only and no Molasses based distillery
unit shall be operated with capacity of 3 KLPD. Working days of Distillery are
350 Days.
[2] The industry shall ensure that the treated effluent and stack emissions from the
unit are within the norms stipulated under the EPA rules or HSPCB whichever is
more stringent. In case of process disturbances/failure of pollution control
equipment adopted by the unit, the respective unit shall be shut down and shall not
be restarted until the control measures are rectified to achieve the desired
efficiency.
[3] The particulate emissions from the 01TPH boiler shall be controlled by installation
of ESP and emissions shall be dispersed though stack height as per the HSPCB
guidelines. The particulate emissions shall conform to the prescribed standards.
[4] The Company shall upload the status of compliance of the stipulated
environmental clearance conditions, including results of monitored data on its
website and shall update the same periodically. It shall simultaneously be sent to
the Regional Office of MoEF, the respective Zonal office of HSPCB and State
13
Pollution Control Board. The levels of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HC (ambient
levels), emissions from the stacks and PH, TDS, BOD, COD, Chloride, suspended
solids and sulphates in the treated effluent shall be monitored and displayed at a
convenient location near the main gate of the company and at important public
places.
[5] Spent wash generation shall not exceed 6 Kl/Kl of alcohol. Spent wash shall be
treated through decanter and concentrated in multi-effect evaporator (MEE) to
form DWGS. DWGS will be sold as cattle Feed. The condensate will be treated in
the ETP comprising neutralization and filtration (UF + RO). Treated effluent will
be used for makeup water of cooling towers and water quality of treated effluent
shall meet the norms prescribed by HSPCB/SPCB and recycle/reuse.
[6] The spent wash shall be stored in impervious pucca lagoons. The spent wash
lagoons shall have proper lining with HDPE and shall be kept in proper condition
to prevent ground water pollution. As per the HSPCB recommendation, storage
shall not exceed 5 days capacity
[7] Adequate numbers of ground water quality monitoring stations by providing
piezometers around the project area shall be set up. Sampling and trend analysis
monitoring must be made on monthly a basis and report submitted to HSPCB and
this Ministry. The ground water quality monitoring for pH, BOD, COD, Chloride,
Sulphate and suspended solids shall be monitored.
[8] Green belt in 33% of the plant area shall be provided to mitigate the effects of
fugitive emissions all around the plant as per HSPCB guidelines in consultation
with the local DFO.
[9] Company shall adopt rainwater harvesting measures to recharge the ground water.
[10] Occupational health surveillance programme shall be undertaken as regular
exercise for all the employees. The first aid facilities in the occupational health
centre shall be strengthened and the medical records of each employee shall be
maintained separately.
[11] Provision shall be made for the housing for the construction labour within the site
with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile
toilets, mobile sewage treatment plant, safe drinking water, medical health care,
crèche etc. The housing may be in the form of temporary structure to be removed
after the completion of the project. All the construction wastes shall be managed
so that there is no impact on the surrounding environment.
[12] No effluent from distillery shall be discharged outside the premises and Zero
discharge shall be adopted.
[13] Fly ash shall be stored separately as per CPCB guidelines so that it shall not
adversely affect the air quality, becoming air borne by wind or water regime
14
during rainy season by flowing along with the storm water. Direct exposure of
workers to fly ash & dust shall be avoided.
[14] Fire fighting system shall be as per norms and cover all areas where alcohol is
produced, handled and stored. Provision of foam system for firefighting shall be
made to control fire from the alcohol storage tank.
[15] Dedicated parking facility for loading and unloading of material shall be provided
in the factory premises. Unit shall develop and implement good traffic
management system for their incoming and outgoing vehicles to avoid congestion
on the public road.
[16] The project proponent shall set up STP of adequate capacity for treatment sewage
generated from the project.
[17] The Project Proponent will take proper mitigation measures to control the green
house effects, radiation effects, ozone depletion effects and acid rain effects during
the building construction phase and operation phase of the project.
[18] The gaseous emissions from DG set shall be dispersed through adequate stack
height as per CPCB guidelines. Acoustic enclosure shall be provided to the DG
sets to mitigate the noise pollution.
[19] In plant, control measures for checking fugitive emissions from all the vulnerable
sources shall be provided. Fugitive emissions shall be controlled by providing
closed storage, closed handling & conveyance of chemicals/materials, multi
cyclone separator and water sprinkling system. Dust suppression system including
water sprinkling system shall be provided at loading and unloading areas to
control dust emissions. Fugitive emissions in the work zone environment, product,
raw materials storage area etc. shall be regularly monitored and records shall be
maintained. The emissions shall conform to the limits prescribed by Haryana State
Pollution Control Board (HSPCB).
[20] Total fresh water requirement shall not exceed 36 KLD for this project.
General Conditions:
[i] Regular mock drills for the on-site emergency management plan specially
pertaining to fire and explosion hazards.
[ii] A separate Environment Management Cell with qualified staff shall be set up for
implementation of the stipulated environmental safeguards.
[iii] Half yearly report on the status of implementation of the stipulated conditions and
environmental safeguards shall be submitted to this SEIAA/HSPCB and Regional
Office of MOEF.
[iv] HSPCB and Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment & Forests located at
Chandigarh will monitor the implementation of the stipulated conditions.
15
[v] Separate funds shall be allocated for implementation of environmental protection
measures along with item-wise break-up. These cost shall be included as part of
the project cost. The funds earmarked for the environment protection measures
shall not be diverted for other purposes and year-wise expenditure should be
reported to the Ministry.
[vi] The project authorities shall inform the SEIAA/ Regional Office of MOEF
regarding the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the
concerned authorities and the dates of start of land development work and
commissioning of plant.
[vii] The project proponent shall advertise in at least two local newspapers widely
circulated in the region around the project, one of which shall be in the vernacular
language of the locality concerned within seven days from the date of this
clearance letter, informing that the project has been accorded environmental
clearance and copies of clearance letter are available with the State Pollution
Control Board/Authority may also be seen at Website of the SEIAA.
[viii] The SEIAA reserves the right to revoke the clearance if conditions stipulated are
not implemented to the satisfaction of the SEIAAE. SEIAA may impose
additional environmental conditions or modify the existing ones, if necessary.
[ix] The environmental clearance accorded shall be valid for a period of 5 years from
the start of production operations.
[x] In case of any deviation or alteration in the project proposed from those submitted
to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference should be made to the SEIAA to
assess the adequacy of the condition(s) imposed and to add additional
environmental protection measures required, if any.
[xi] The Project Proponent will provide Laboratory facilities for regular testing of Air
Emission, Effluent and Noise samples.
[xii] The company shall undertake CSR activities and all relevant measures for
improving the socio-economic conditions of the surrounding area.
[xiii] The above stipulations would be enforced among others under the Water
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control
of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and rules there
under, Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989 and its
amendments, the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and its amendments.
Item No.[13]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony project at Village Fazilpur Jharsa, Sector-71, Distt.
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarvpriya Securities Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 125th meeting held on 11.01.2016 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
16
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Colony
project at Village Fazilpur Jharsa, Sector-71, Distt. Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area
of 24281.1 sqm (6 Acre). The total built up area shall be 56500.8 sqm. The proposed
Project shall comprise of GF + 10 Floors. The total Dwelling units shall be 980. The
maximum height of the building shall be 38.8 meter. The total water requirement shall be
700 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 449 KLD. The waste water generation
shall be 592 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 710 KLD capacity. The total
power requirement shall be 2690 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 20.261% of project area (15% tree
plantation + 5.261% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 08 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2638 kg/day. The bio-
degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic
waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 534 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC
vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and
the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.261% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
17
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed ‘GARHI Stone mines Along
with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village-Garhi over an area of 6.70
ha in District-Mahendergarh by M/s Haryana Mining Company.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Haryana
Mining Company for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed ‘GARHI Stone mines Along
with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village-Garhi over an area of 6.70 ha in District-
Mahendergarh by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 6.70 ha having Khasra no. 07,
village GARHI. The project proponent on 19.01.2015 submitted online application along
with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in
the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has
clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly
the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Viillage Garhi, District-Mahendergarh
3. Project Details Khasra No.
/Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals Garhi, Khasra no. 07, over an area of 6.70
ha
22,50000 MT/year
4. Project Cost 60 lakh
5. Water Requirement & Source 26 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 20 KLD
Plantation 3 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
11.50 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production in laks ton.
First 336 to 312 18.30
Second 306 to 288 22.30
Third 2 82 to 270 22.26
Fourth 264 to 252 22.26
Fifth 246 to 234 22.27
18
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 200 Trees
II Yr. 200 Trees
III Yr. 200 Trees
IV Yr. 200 Trees
V Yr. 200 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions.
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for Production of Stone along with
Associated Minerals as per below mentioned figures.
Year Bench mrl Production in laks ton.
First 336 to 312 18.30
Second 306 to 288 22.30
Third 2 82to 270 22.26
Fourth 264 to 252 22.26
Fifth 246 to 234 22.27
[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTE and CTO under Air Act and Water
Act from HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the
HSPCB.
[3] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved
mining plan.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that the mining operations shall not intersect
groundwater table and the mining operation should be restricted at least 3 meter
above the ground water table.
[5] Topsoil shall be stacked temporarily at earmarked sites only and it shall not be
kept unutilized for a period more than three years; it shall be used for land
reclamation and plantation in mined out areas.
[6] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall
be obstructed due to any mining operations.
[7] The over burden generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site (s) only and it
shall not be kept active for long period of time. The maximum height of the
already existing waste dumps shall not exceed 5 meter in single terraces and the
slope angle shall not exceed 28o as per norms.
19
[8] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the
designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the
overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.
[9] The benches height and slope shall be maintained as per approved mining plan.
[10] Waste dump shall be terraced. The height of the dump and its slope shall not
exceed as suggested in the approved mining plan. A retaining wall shall be
constructed at the toe of the dump.
[11] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.
[12] Check dams shall be constructed in the seasonal rivulets to prevent the flow of
fines to low lying areas during rains.
[13] The total waste generated in the present plan period shall be as envisaged, which
shall be accommodated in old dumpsite in addition to the waste already dumped.
Monitoring and management of rehabilitated areas shall continue until the
vegetation becomes self sustaining. Compliance status shall be submitted to
HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly basis.
[14] Drills shall either be operated with dust extractors or equipped with water injection
system.
[15] The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit shall be terraced and plantation
done to stabilize the slopes. The slop of higher benches shall be made gentler for
easy accessibility by local people to use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall
be carried out along the excavated area.
[16] Catch drains and siltation ponds of appropriate size shall be constructed for the
working pit, OB dumps and mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The
water so collected shall be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt
development etc. The drains shall be regularly de-silted, particularly after
monsoon and maintained properly.
[17] Garland drains; setting tanks and check dams of appropriate size, gradient and
length shall be constructed both around the mine pit and over burden dumps and
sump capacity shall be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above peak
sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area
adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity shall also provide adequate pits shall be
constructed at the corners of the garland drains and de-silted.
[18] Dimension of the retaining wall at the toe of dumps and OB benches within the
mine to check run-off and siltation shall be based on the rainfall data.
[19] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the
proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt
should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the
20
native species around ML area, OB dumps, backfilled and reclaimed around water
body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture Department.
[20] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution
and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading
point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality
Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.
[21] The project authority shall implement suitable conservation measures to augment
ground water resources in the area in consultation with the Regional Director,
Central Ground Water Board.
[22] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and
around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre
monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter
(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional
Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.
[23] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana
Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by
MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.
[24] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.
Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and
in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and
shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must
have pollution under control certificate.
[25] Blasting operation shall be carried out only during the daytime. Controlled
blasting shall be practiced. The mitigation measures for control of ground
vibrations and to arrest fly rocks and boulders shall be implemented.
[26] The blasting operation will be carried out as per the norms of Director (Mines &
Safety), Gaziabad. Take all safety measures as per the various mining regulations.
[27] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining
operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in
the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State
Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the
conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the
project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation
plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A
copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,
Chandigarh within 3 months.
21
[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 11.50
lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures
including recurring expenses per year.
[29] A sum of Rs. 22 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for
investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area
particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural
women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should
contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and
improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such
activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA
Haryana before the start of operation.
[30] Budgetary provision of Rs. 03 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in
the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation
facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and
toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at
the time of CTE/CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided
for mining labours.
[31] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to
the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral
concession rules 2012.
[32] The water reservoir, which would be created/available during post closure (all
pits), shall be provided with suitable benches and fencing to provide the access to
the water body and safety.
[33] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of
compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s
website and displayed at the project site.
[34] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms
fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.
[35] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened
as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of
the work.
[36] The project proponent shall ensure that all measures are taken simultaneously for
safeguard and maintenance of the health of the workers.
[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
[i] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without
prior approval of the SEIAA.
22
[ii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and
waste shall not be made.
[iii] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided
based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and
ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in
consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six
monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the
HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.
[iv] Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels below 85 dBA in the work
environment. Workers engaged in operations of HEMM etc. shall be provided
with earplugs/muffs.
[v] Waste water (workshop and waste water from the mine) shall be properly
collected & treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed under GSR 422
(E) dated 19th May 93 and 31st December 1993 (amended to date). Oil and grease
trap shall be installed before discharge.
[vi] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they
shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health
aspects.
[vii] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken
periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take
corrective measures, if needed.
[viii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in
separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise
expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF
located at Chandigarh.
[ix] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of
compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data
(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of
MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.
[x] The SEIAA, Haryana reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any
of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of
any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Haryana or any other competent
authorities is not satisfactory.
[xi] Failure to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in
withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
23
[xii] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and
also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of
Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.
[xiii] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded
Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are
available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should
be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in
two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the
same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance
conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.
[xiv] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from
the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,
Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be
obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority
before the start of mining operation.
[xv] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does
not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed
under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete
responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the
time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal
against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if
preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National
Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony
Project located at Village-Naurangpur, Sector-80, District Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s R.P.Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony Project located at Village-Naurangpur, Sector-80, District Gurgaon,
Haryana on a plot area of 12089.9 sqm (2.9875 Acres). The total built up area shall be
35983.11 sqm. The proposed project shall comprise of 3 basements + GF + 24 Floors.
The maximum height of the building shall be 93.45 meters. The total water requirement
shall be 236 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 146 KLD. The waste water
generation shall be 100 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 120 KLD capacity.
In the today’s meeting the detail it was observed by the Authority that:
24
1. The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of
bio-degradable waste not discussed. The space allocated in the project for
management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.
2. The height of the proposed building 93.45 Meter. The Structural stability
certificate not obtained.
3. The License is valid up to 07.12.2015. The project proponent is required to submit
validated license.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Stone along with associated
minor minerals of Kheribattar-1 over and tentative area of 7.47 Ha. in
Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Quality Earth
Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Quality
Earth Minerals Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Stone along with
associated minor minerals of Kheribattar-1 over and tentative area of 7.47 Ha. in Tehsil-
Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 21.10.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 7.47 Ha having Khasra no.
136, village Kheribattar-1. The project proponent on 29.12.2015 submitted online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The
Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500
meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2.
NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village -Kheribattar-1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-
Bhiwani
3. Project Details Khasra No.
/Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals Kheribattar-1, Khasra no. 136, over an
area of 7.47 ha
1800000 MT/year
4. Project Cost 10 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 38 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 24 KLD
Plantation 10 KLD
Drinking 4 KLD
25
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
13.50 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production in laks ton.
First 250 to 235 16,00000
Second 235 to 217 17,00000
Third 217 to 199 18,00000
Fourth 199 to 181 18,00000
Fifth 181 to 163 18,00000
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 250 Trees
II Yr. 250 Trees
III Yr. 250 Trees
IV Yr. 250 Trees
V Yr. 250 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions.
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for Production of Stone along with
Associated Minerals as per below mentioned figures.
Year Bench mrl Production in laks ton.
First 250 to 235 16,00000
Second 235 to 217 17,00000
Third 217 to 199 18,00000
Fourth 199 to 181 18,00000
Fifth 181 to 163 18,00000
[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTE and CTO under Air Act and Water
Act from HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the
HSPCB.
[3] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved
mining plan.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that the mining operations shall not intersect
groundwater table and the mining operation should be restricted at least 3 meter
above the ground water table.
[5] Topsoil shall be stacked temporarily at earmarked sites only and it shall not be
kept unutilized for a period more than three years; it shall be used for land
reclamation and plantation in mined out areas.
26
[6] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall
be obstructed due to any mining operations.
[7] The over burden generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site (s) only and it
shall not be kept active for long period of time. The maximum height of the
already existing waste dumps shall not exceed 5 meter in single terraces and the
slope angle shall not exceed 28o as per norms.
[8] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the
designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the
overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.
[9] The benches height and slope shall be maintained as per approved mining plan.
[10] Waste dump shall be terraced. The height of the dump and its slope shall not
exceed as suggested in the approved mining plan. A retaining wall shall be
constructed at the toe of the dump.
[11] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.
[12] Check dams shall be constructed in the seasonal rivulets to prevent the flow of
fines to low lying areas during rains.
[13] The total waste generated in the present plan period shall be as envisaged, which
shall be accommodated in old dumpsite in addition to the waste already dumped.
Monitoring and management of rehabilitated areas shall continue until the
vegetation becomes self sustaining. Compliance status shall be submitted to
HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly basis.
[14] Drills shall either be operated with dust extractors or equipped with water injection
system.
[15] The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit shall be terraced and plantation
done to stabilize the slopes. The slop of higher benches shall be made gentler for
easy accessibility by local people to use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall
be carried out along the excavated area.
[16] Catch drains and siltation ponds of appropriate size shall be constructed for the
working pit, OB dumps and mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The
water so collected shall be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt
development etc. The drains shall be regularly de-silted, particularly after
monsoon and maintained properly.
[17] Garland drains; setting tanks and check dams of appropriate size, gradient and
length shall be constructed both around the mine pit and over burden dumps and
sump capacity shall be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above peak
sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area
adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity shall also provide adequate pits shall be
constructed at the corners of the garland drains and de-silted.
27
[18] Dimension of the retaining wall at the toe of dumps and OB benches within the
mine to check run-off and siltation shall be based on the rainfall data.
[19] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the
proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt
should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the
native species around ML area, OB dumps, backfilled and reclaimed around water
body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture Department.
[20] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution
and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading
point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality
Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.
[21] The project authority shall implement suitable conservation measures to augment
ground water resources in the area in consultation with the Regional Director,
Central Ground Water Board.
[22] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and
around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre
monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter
(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional
Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.
[23] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana
Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by
MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.
[24] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.
Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and
in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and
shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must
have pollution under control certificate.
[25] Blasting operation shall be carried out only during the daytime. Controlled
blasting shall be practiced. The mitigation measures for control of ground
vibrations and to arrest fly rocks and boulders shall be implemented.
[26] The blasting operation will be carried out as per the norms of Director (Mines &
Safety), Gaziabad. Take all safety measures as per the various mining regulations.
[27] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining
operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in
the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State
Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the
conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the
project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation
28
plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A
copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,
Chandigarh within 3 months.
[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 13.50
lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures
including recurring expenses per year.
[29] A sum of Rs. 20 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for
investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area
particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural
women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should
contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and
improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such
activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA
Haryana before the start of operation.
[30] Budgetary provision of Rs. 05 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in
the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation
facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and
toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at
the time of CTE/CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided
for mining labours.
[31] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to
the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral
concession rules 2012.
[32] The water reservoir, which would be created/available during post closure (all
pits), shall be provided with suitable benches and fencing to provide the access to
the water body and safety.
[33] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of
compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s
website and displayed at the project site.
[34] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms
fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.
[35] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened
as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of
the work.
[36] The project proponent shall ensure that all measures are taken simultaneously for
safeguard and maintenance of the health of the workers.
[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.
29
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
[i] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without
prior approval of the SEIAA.
[ii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and
waste shall not be made.
[iii] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided
based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and
ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in
consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six
monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the
HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.
[iv] Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels below 85 dBA in the work
environment. Workers engaged in operations of HEMM etc. shall be provided
with earplugs/muffs.
[v] Waste water (workshop and waste water from the mine) shall be properly
collected & treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed under GSR 422
(E) dated 19th May 93 and 31st December 1993 (amended to date). Oil and grease
trap shall be installed before discharge.
[vi] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they
shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health
aspects.
[vii] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken
periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take
corrective measures, if needed.
[viii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in
separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise
expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF
located at Chandigarh.
[ix] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of
compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data
(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of
MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.
[x] The SEIAA, Haryana reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any
of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of
any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Haryana or any other competent
authorities is not satisfactory.
30
[xi] Failure to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in
withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
[xii] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and
also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of
Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.
[xiii] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded
Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are
available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should
be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in
two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the
same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance
conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.
[xiv] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from
the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,
Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be
obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority
before the start of mining operation.
[xv] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does
not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed
under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete
responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the
time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal
against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if
preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National
Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for proposed Residential Plotted Colony
along with Group Housing Project located at Village Mohmmadpur
Gujjar & Sohna, Sector-2, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Supertech
Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Residential Plotted Colony along with Group Housing Project located at Village
Mohmmadpur Gujjar & Sohna, Sector-2, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of
406177.9 sqm (100.368 Acres); (20.16 Acres Group Housing) (80.20875 Acres Plotted
Colony). The total built up area shall be 514990.913 sqm. The proposed project shall
31
have 15 Towers; Tower 1, 3 to 7- Basement + Stilt + 18 floors, Tower 2 – Basement +
Stilt + 22 floors, Tower 8 to 11 – Basement + GF + 18 floors, Tower 12,13 – Basement +
GF + 24 floors, Tower 14 – Basement + GF + 22 floors, Tower 15 – Basement + GF + 18
floors, EWS – Basement + GF + 9 floors. The Plotted area shall have 691 no. of
Residential units (138 EWS units + 370 units + 183 NPNL units). The Group Housing
component shall have 1692 no. of dwelling units (1324 Flats + 234 EWS units + 134
Service units). The maximum height of the building shall be 80.85 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 3295 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 1688 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 2346 KLD which will be treated in the 2STPs of 2820
KLD (1600 KLD + 1220 KLD) capacity. The total power requirement shall be 11784.09
KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop
green belt on 158450 sqm (39%) of project area (16957.23 sqm tree plantation + 35244.1
avenue plantation + 107248.6 sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 56 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 8690 kg/day.
The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate
technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 2683 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. It was observed that the project proponent on 20.01.2015. the
case was transfer to MoEF & CC, GoI due to lapse of the term of SEIAA. The MoEF &
CC, GoI in its 148th meeting held on 20.05.2015 approved the TOR and convey to the
project proponent on 22.06.2015. The case was again transferred on 31.08.2015 after the
constitution of SEIAA. On the basis of the approved TOR the project proponent on
28.08.2015 submitted the EIA/EMP report. Detailed discussions were held regarding
water requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality,
NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and
reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The representative of the project
proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of
EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection,
drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli
Notification and structural stability certificate. It was observed that the details of
calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste
not discussed. The space allocated in the project for management of solid waste not
earmarked on the plan.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of bio-
32
degradable waste and space allocated in the project area for management of solid waste
on the plan within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 39% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit details of calculation of Solid Waste
Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste and the space
allocated in the project for management of solid waste on the plan.
Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Punjab National Bank
Institutional Building at Plot No. 84, Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana by
Punjab National Bank.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Punjab
National Bank Institutional Building at Plot No. 84, Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana on a
total plot area of 14947.8 sqm (3.69 acre). The total built up area shall be 27312 sqm. The
proposed Project shall comprise of 02 Basements + Stilt + Maximum 7 Floors. The
maximum height of the building shall be 38.70 meter. The total water requirement shall
be 87 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 57 KLD. The waste water generation
shall be 38 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 50 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 3578.38 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 37.04% of project area (20% tree
plantation + 16.79% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 04 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 216 kg/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste
converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces
proposed are 316 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was observed that the project proponent
has not mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
33
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days
Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Project “Laxmi Apartments” at Sector-99 A, Dwarka
Expressway, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pareena Infrastructures Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Project “Laxmi Apartments” at Sector-99 A, Dwarka
Expressway, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 19882.17 sqm (4.913 Acres). The
total built up area shall be 46440.332 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 09
Towers consisting of Basement + Stilt + 12 Floors. The total Dwelling units shall be 804.
The maximum height of the building shall be 44.65 meter. The total water requirement
shall be 591 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 374 KLD. The waste water
generation shall be 446 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 630 KLD capacity. The
total power requirement shall be 6810 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The
Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4003.58 sqm (20.13%) of
project area (1592.874 sqm tree plantation + 1061.892 sqm avenue plantation + 1348.82
sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting
pits. The solid waste generation will be 1660.685 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will
be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total
parking spaces proposed are 513 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding existence of revenuer rasta, gas pipe line, water
requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC
regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse
of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent
34
submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding
non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
It was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC
vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and
the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.13% of the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[20]Environmental Clearance for “Tulip Homes” Group Housing Project,
at Sector-69-70, Gurgaon by M/S Tulip Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The representation dated 07.12.2015 submitted by the project proponent claiming
deemed environmental clearance for its project in contrast to the recommendations of
SEAC and to review the decision, in respect of the captioned project was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The detailed examination of the representation
manifests that SEAC in its 55th Meeting held on dated 09.03/10.03..2011 had
recommended their project for environment clearance after due appraisal and
consideration of events. The recommendations for grant of Environmental Clearance to
the project had been sent to SEIAA on 14.03.2011.
However, due to procedural constraints i.e termination of tenure of SEIAA, the
project of the project proponent could not be considered by SEIAA for Environment
Clearance as observed by SEAC. The matter was then transferred to MOEF for the
needful action as per provision of the EIA Notification. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
considered this case in its 105th meeting held on 23.09.2011 i.e. after six months of
recommendation of SEAC. The EAC of MoEF GoI raised some observations and no
further action was taken the case was transferred to SEIAA after its reconstitution. The
project proponent submitted an undertaking that they started the construction on
15.07.2011 after the expiry of four months from the date of recommendation for EC of
35
their project proposal by SEAC considering their case as deemed cleared case as per para
8 of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 but on the contrary the SEIAA decided to
recommend this case to PS Environment Haryana for initiating legal action against
Project Proponent for starting construction without obtaining prior environmental
clearance as per prescribed procedure of MOEF GOI.
The case of other Developer i.e M/s Ninex Developers, of same arena have been
brought into the light by the project proponent wherein the claim of M/s Ninex
Developers that their project proposal qualifies for deemed clearance as per para 8 (iii
and iv) was accepted by SEIAA under similar circumstances, thus they can’t be put under
the hammer of discrimination in violation to it fundamental rights. All the aspects have
been brought into light by project proponent and whereby claimed deemed approval of
environmental clearance by harping upon MOEF GOI Notification dated 14.09.2006
coupled with case of Ninex Developer and recommendations of SEAC observed vide
55th meeting dated14.032011.
This case has been examined in the light of clause (iii) and (iv) under Para no. 8 of
EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and on the submissions detailed vide representation
dated 7th December, 2015. It has been observed that the project proposal qualifies for
deemed approval after 45 days from 14.03.2011 as the SEAC in its meeting held on
09/10.03.2011 had recommended this case for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA for
grant of Environmental clearance but no such decision on the recommendation of SEAC
had been conveyed by SEIAA to the project proponent within the stipulated period.
In view of the above discussions the Authority agreed to review its decision taken
in 79th meeting held on 09.01.2015 and decided that the project proposal qualifies for
deemed clearance after the expiry of 45 days of recommendation of SEAC dated
14.03.2011 for granting environment clearance to the project; in view of para no. 8 (iii
and iv) of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and also decided that the project proponent
shall comply with the conditions as stated therein in the recommendation of SEAC of 55th
meeting held on 09/10.03.2011.
On 01.03.2016
Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony located at
Village Bajghera, Sector-114, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Candeo Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony located at Village Bajghera, Sector-114, District Gurgaon, Haryana
on a total plot area of 49925.26 sqmt (12.3368 acres). The total built up area shall be
197594.39 sqmt. The proposed project shall have of 4 basements + GF + maximum 13
36
Floors, Service Apartment, Food Court and Multiplex. The maximum height of the
building shall be 62.8 meter. The total water requirement shall be 881 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 269 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 397 KLD
which will be treated in the STP of 480 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall
be 8000 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed
to develop green belt on 31.84% of project area (20% tree plantation + 11.84%
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 12 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 2562 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are
3064 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent on 13.11.2013 submitted
application for environmental clearance and SEAC in its 98th meeting held on 08.01.2014
recommended this project for environment clearance. The SEIAA in its 73rd meeting held
on 18.07.2014 referred back the case to SEAC with the advice to appraise this project on
the basis of Notification dated 26.02.2014 requiring approval of TOR and preparation of
EIA/EMP. The SEAC 111th meeting held on 09.09.2014 approved the TOR. The project
proponent on 14.09.2015 submitted EIA/EMP. The EIA/EMP was finally considered by
SEAC in its 127th meeting and SEAC again recommended this case of environment
clearance.
Detailed discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, water requirement, quality
of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the
assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA
for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC
from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from
AAI regarding height clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has
earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for collection,
segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste but the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the
generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process
involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste within 15 days.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
37
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[5] The project proponent shall ensure that the plinth level of the building block
to be 1.5 meter above 100 years flood level of the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[6] The project proponent shall obtain NOC from HUDA as well as Irrigation
Department before the start of construction, regarding possible adverse effect
of project proposal on the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[7] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[8] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
[9] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved
for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.
Item No.[22]Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Plotted
Colony” project located at Sector 6, Agroha, Dist Hisar, Haryana by
M/s Office of the Executive Engineer HUDA
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for construction of
“Residential Plotted Colony” project located at Sector 6, Agroha, Dist Hisar, Haryana on
a total plot area of 819082.44 sqm (202.40 Acres). The total built up area shall be
402477.97 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of Residential Plots, Group
Housing & EWS, Banquet hall, Nursing homes, High schools/Primary school/ Nursery
schools & Institutional centre, Shopping centre, Day care centre & crèche, Police Post,
Taxi Stand etc. The total water requirement shall be 3137 KLD. The fresh water
requirement shall be 1797 KLD/ canal supply. The waste water generation shall be 2208
KLD, which will be treated in the Common STP (CSTP). The CSTP treated water shall
be used for flushing, horticulture and other misc. purposes.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. It was observed by the Authority that:
38
[1] The project proponent has proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by adopting
OWC but the details of OWC capacity and area on the plan was not earmarked.
[2] The project proponent has proposed to treat waste water in the common STP but
the details of common STP its location on the plan and the status of development
of STP was not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit location of
STP and its status of development.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to recycle and re-use the treated water the
details of which were not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit
dual plumbing plan and re-use/recycle of treated water.
[4] The project proponent is required to submit the name and designation of the
officer who shall be responsible for implementation of the stipulated conditions
and safeguards of environment clearance.
In view of the above observations the Authority decided to defer to this case with
the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above
observation within 15 days.
Item No.[23]Environmental Clearance for the Adesh Haryana University located at
Village Mohri, Dist Kurukshetra, Haryana by M/s Adesh Welfare
Society.
The SEAC has recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent
under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the project proponent has completed the
construction of Hospital project without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The
SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and
27.06.2013.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of
OM of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter
no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from
MoEF&CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view
the quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF
& CC, GOI has been received.
In view of the above the Authority decided to keep this case pending till
clarification is received from MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[24]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony located at revenue estate of Village Bhatola, Sector-
82, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s S3 Infrareality Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 127th meeting held on 16.02.2016 has recommended this project
for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The
Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Colony
located at revenue estate of Village Bhatola, Sector-82, Faridabad, Haryana on a total plot
area of 20234.25 sqm (5 acre). The total built up area shall be 51465.27 sqm. The Group
39
Housing project shall have 8 Towers + S + 13 Floors, Aganwadi. The Group Housing
project shall have 816 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be
40.83 meter. The total water requirement shall be 591 KLD. The fresh water requirement
shall be 397 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 488 KLD, which will be treated in
the STP of 585 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 4372.5 KVA which
will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt
on 378.287 sqm (20.82%) of project area (719.362 sqm tree plantation + 1894.95 sqm
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 5 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 2225 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking
spaces proposed are 432 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to
HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system
and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was observed that the
project proponent has submitted calculations and detail of the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis
the generation of bio-degradable waste and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.95% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
Item No.[25]Environmental for construction of commercial Colony located in
revenue estate of Village Badshahpur, Sector-70 of GMUC, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Ojos Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony located in revenue estate of Village Badshahpur, Sector-70 of
GMUC, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 9813.611 sqm (2.45 acre). The total
built up area shall be 30135.2 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 02 Basements
+ GF + Maximum 10 Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 49.13 meter.
The total water requirement shall be 309 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 213
40
KLD. The waste water generation shall be 120 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of
200 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 2332 KVA which will be
supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on
2319.4 sqm (25.02%) of project area (176.9 sqm tree plantation + 1072 sqm
landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 03 rain water harvesting pits.
The solid waste generation will be 946 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated
in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required
for OWC-60 will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 413 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was observed that the project proponent
has submitted calculations and detail of the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of
bio-degradable waste and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.
[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air
based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by
project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.
[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
Item No. [26] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP/CETP Project at
Village Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana
by Public Health Engineering Division: Appeal to review the decision.
Chairman SEIAA permitted to take up the representation received from Executive
Engineer Public Health Kurukshetra. The Engineer in Chief Public Health Department,
Haryana appeared before the Authority in the today’s meeting with the copy of Memo
No. 2602 dated 29.02.2016 with the appeal to review the decision taken by SEIAA in
their case as conveyed to them vide SEIAA letter dated 22.01.2016.
The representative of the Department claimed that they are proposing to construct
STP and not CETP and they have got the waste water samples of the area analyzed from
HSPCB and as per the opinion of HSPCB no industrial effluent is flowing in either the
drain or the sewer. The representative of the project proponent requested to reconsider the
case as it does not fall under the purview of item no 7 (h) of EIA Notification 14.09.2006.
41
It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has passed directions to the project proponent to
get environmental clearance under item no. 7 (h) of EIA Notification 14.09.2006 from
SEIAA before the start of construction. The representative of the project proponent also
clarified that their Department had challenged the orders of Hon’ble NGT in the Hon’ble
Supreme Court but the Hon’ble Supreme Court has declined their appeal. The
representative of the project proponent was asked to provide the copy of orders passed by
Hon’ble Supreme Court. The representative of the project proponent further clarified that
they will again get the analysis of waste water samples from HSPCB and NABL/MoEF
approved lab.
It was observed that the project proposal is under active consideration of SEAC
for appraisal and it was decided to forward the copy of representation submitted by the
project proponent to SEAC with the advice to examine the same on merit keeping in view
the orders passed by the Hon’ble Courts vis-à-vis the applicability of EIA Notification.
The decision of the Authority was also conveyed to the representative of the project
proponent present in the meeting.
****
1
Minutes of the 89th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 28.03.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 223-225 dated 22.03.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
Colony Project at Village Sohna & Khaika, Sector-4, Distt Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s GLS Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
1. The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 15.66% of the
project area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project
proponent shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015
submitted revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the
same.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit plan
depicting the area ear marked for composting.
3. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
4. The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.
The SEAC in its 127th meeting held on 16.02.2016 considered the reply dated
24.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and again
recommended this case for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was
taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by project
proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.017% of project area.
2
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities shall be provided for construction
workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. Open defecation
by the laboures is strictly prohibited. The safe disposal of solid wastes/ waste water
generated during the construction phase should be ensured. Efforts shall be made to
provide mobile STP for treatment of waste water during the construction phase.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed project 15 Acres “Cyber Park”
at Village-Fazilpur, Jharsa & Bhadshahpur, Sector-69, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Unitech Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Cyber
Park” at Village-Fazilpur, Jharsa & Bhadshahpur, Sector-69, Gurgaon, Haryana on a plot
area is 60702.75 sqm (15 Acres). The total built up area shall be 349976.90 sqm. The
proposed project shall comprise of 05 Towers in which 4 Basement + GF + maximum 21
floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 95.05 meters. The total water
requirement shall be 1174 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 340 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 878 KLD, which will be treated in the 3 STPs of 500
KLD, 300 KLD & 200 KLD capacities.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was noticed that the project proponent has proposed to use excavated Top soil for use of
landscaping and has proposed to stack the same in the project area covering the same
with Tarpaulin. The project proponent is required to give exact quantum of Top soil to be
excavated and also brief description for its preservation in order to control its erosion. It
was observed that as a mitigation measure under Water Environment due to improper
disposal of construction debris leading to offsite contamination of water reserves; the
project proponent has proposed disposal of construction debris in low lying area. The
project proponent is required to submit the area identified for the same. It was observed
that the project area is at a distance of 9 km from National Highway and is located along
90 meter wide Southern Peripheral Road and the project proponent on the basis of
PCU/hr calculated for NH-8 and Sohna Road has claimed that since carrying capacity of
3
NH-8 is much higher than proposed traffic volume therefore the traffic movement from
the proposed Cyber Park will not create any traffic congestion. The project proponent is
required to justify the same with authenticated proof.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer to this case with
the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below
mentioned observation within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for
preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding disposal method of
construction debris in the low lying area as reported in the EIA/EMP.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the claim that the carrying capacity of NH-8 is
much higher than the proposed traffic volume and traffic movement from the
proposed project will not create any congestion on NH-8 with calculations and
authenticated proof.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for the proposed ‘Stone Along with
Associated Minor Minerals’ at ‘Ramalwas’ over an area of 12.25 Ha.
In Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani by M/s Kayden Infra Engineering
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended granting Environment Clearance to M/s Kayden
Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed ‘Ramalwas’ Stone
mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Ramalwas over an area of
12.25 Ha in Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 12.25 Ha having Khasra no.
105/1, Village- Ramalwas. The project proponent on 12.09.2015 submitted online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The
Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500
meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2.
NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village- Ramalwas, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals Ramalwas, Khasra no. 105/1, over an area
of 12.25 Ha
20,00,000 Ton/year
4. Project Cost 8.5 Crores
4
5. Water Requirement & Source 30 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 18 KLD
Plantation 9 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
13.50 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 284 to 254 20,00,000 Ton
Second 254 to 230 20,00,000 Ton
Third 230 to 218 20,00,000 Ton
Fourth 218 to 206 20,00,000 Ton
Fifth 206 to 194 20,00,000 Ton
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 250 Trees
II Yr. 250 Trees
III Yr. 250 Trees
IV Yr. 250 Trees
V Yr. 250 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions.
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for Production of Stone along with
Associated Minerals as per below mentioned figures.
Year Bench mrl Production
First 284 to 254 20,00,000 Ton
Second 254 to 230 20,00,000 Ton
Third 230 to 218 20,00,000 Ton
Fourth 218 to 206 20,00,000 Ton
Fifth 206 to 194 20,00,000 Ton
[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTO under Air Act and Water Act from
HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the HSPCB.
[3] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved
Mining Plan.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that the mining operations shall not intersect
groundwater table and the mining operation should be restricted at least 3 meter
above the ground water table.
5
[5] Topsoil shall be stacked temporarily at earmarked sites only and it shall not be
kept unutilized for a period more than three years; it shall be used for land
reclamation and plantation in mined out areas.
[6] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall
be obstructed due to any mining operations.
[7] The over burden generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site (s) only and it
shall not be kept active for long period of time. The maximum height of the
already existing waste dumps shall not exceed 5 meter in single terraces and the
slope angle shall not exceed 28o as per norms.
[8] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the
designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the
overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.
[9] The benches height and slope shall be maintained as per approved mining plan.
[10] Waste dump shall be terraced. The height of the dump and its slope shall not
exceed as suggested in the approved mining plan. A retaining wall shall be
constructed at the toe of the dump.
[11] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.
[12] Check dams shall be constructed in the seasonal rivulets to prevent the flow of
fines to low lying areas during rains.
[13] The total waste generated in the present plan period shall be as envisaged, which
shall be accommodated in old dumpsite in addition to the waste already dumped.
Monitoring and management of rehabilitated areas shall continue until the
vegetation becomes self sustaining. Compliance status shall be submitted to
HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly bases.
[14] Drills shall either be operated with dust extractors or equipped with water injection
system.
[15] The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit shall be terraced and plantation
done to stabilize the slopes. The slop of higher benches shall be made gentler for
easy accessibility by local people to use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall
be carried out along the excavated area.
[16] Catch drains and siltation ponds of appropriate size shall be constructed for the
working pit, OB dumps and mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The
water so collected shall be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt
development etc. The drains shall be regularly de-silted, particularly after
monsoon and maintained properly.
[17] Garland drains; setting tanks and check dams of appropriate size, gradient and
length shall be constructed both around the mine pit and over burden dumps and
sump capacity shall be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above peak
6
sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area
adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity shall also provide adequate pits shall be
constructed at the corners of the garland drains and de-silted.
[18] Dimension of the retaining wall at the toe of dumps and OB benches within the
mine to check run-off and siltation shall be based on the rainfall data.
[19] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the
proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt
should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the
native species around ML area, OB dumps, backfilled and reclaimed around water
body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture Department.
[20] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution
and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading
point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality
Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.
[21] The project authority shall implement suitable conservation measures to augment
ground water resources in the area in consultation with the Regional Director,
Central Ground Water Board.
[22] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and
around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre
monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter
(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional
Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.
[23] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana
Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by
MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.
[24] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.
Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and
in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and
shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must
have pollution under control certificate.
[25] Blasting operation shall be carried out only during the daytime. Controlled
blasting shall be practiced. The mitigation measures for control of ground
vibrations and to arrest fly rocks and boulders shall be implemented.
[26] The blasting operation will be carried out as per the norms of Director (Mines &
Safety), Gaziabad. Take all safety measures as per the various mining regulations.
[27] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining
operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in
the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State
7
Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the
conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the
project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation
plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A
copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,
Chandigarh within 3 months.
[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 13.50
lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures
including recurring expenses per year.
[29] A sum of Rs. 20 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for
investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area
particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural
women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should
contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and
improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such
activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA
Haryana before the start of operation.
[30] Budgetary provision of Rs. 05 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in
the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation
facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and
toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at
the time of CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided
for mining labours.
[31] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to
the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral
concession rules 2012.
[32] The water reservoir, which would be created/available during post closure (all
pits), shall be provided with suitable benches and fencing to provide the access to
the water body and safety.
[33] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of
compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s
website and displayed at the project site.
[34] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms
fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.
[35] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened
as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of
the work.
8
[36] The project proponent shall ensure that all measures are taken simultaneously for
safeguard and maintenance of the health of the workers.
[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
[i] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without
prior approval of the SEIAA.
[ii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and
waste shall not be made.
[iii] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided
based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and
ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in
consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six
monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the
HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.
[iv] Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels below 85 dBA in the work
environment. Workers engaged in operations of HEMM etc. shall be provided
with earplugs/muffs.
[v] Waste water (workshop and waste water from the mine) shall be properly
collected & treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed under GSR 422
(E) dated 19th May 93 and 31st December 1993 (amended to date). Oil and grease
trap shall be installed before discharge.
[vi] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they
shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health
aspects.
[vii] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken
periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take
corrective measures, if needed.
[viii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in
separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise
expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF
located at Chandigarh.
[ix] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of
compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data
(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of
MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.
[x] The SEIAA, Haryana reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any
of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of
9
any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Haryana or any other competent
authorities is not satisfactory.
[xi] Failure to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in
withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
[xii] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and
also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of
Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.
[xiii] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded
Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are
available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should
be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in
two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the
same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance
conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.
[xiv] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from
the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,
Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be
obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority
before the start of mining operation.
[xv] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does
not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed
under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete
responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the
time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal
against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if
preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National
Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Stone Along with
Associated Minor Minerals’ at ‘Maikalan & Maikhurd’ over an area of
3.65 Ha. In Tehsil Dadri, District-Bhiwani by M/s Hari Har Mining
Company.
The SEAC has recommended granting Environment Clearance to M/s Hari Har
Mining Company for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed ‘‘Maikalan & Maikhurd’
Stone mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Maikalan & Maikhurd
over an area of 3.65 Ha. In Tehsil Dadri, District-Bhiwani by imposing stipulations stated
therein.
10
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed that the mine lease area is less than 5 Ha and as such the
environmental clearance in this case is to be granted by DEIAA/DEAC in view of
amendment to the Notification dated 15.01.2016. It was found that MoEF & CC, GoI vide
letter no. Z-11013/8/2016-IA.II (M) dated 15.03.2016 has clarified that where SEAC has
recommended the cases for environmental clearance such cases are to be processed at the
level of SEIAA for grant of environmental clearance. Accordingly it was decided to take
up the case as recommended by SEAC. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology
Department has granted lease for a period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions
as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an
area of 3.65 Ha having Khasra no. 315, 230 & 233 village- Maikalan & Maikhurd. The
project proponent on 13.08.2015 submitted online application along with copy of approved
Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for
5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other
mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised
this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village- Maikalan & Maikhurd Tehsil Dadri,
District-Bhiwani
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals Maikalan & Maikhurd, Khasra no315, 230
& 233, over an area of 3.65 Ha
10,00,000 TPA
4. Project Cost 2.5 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 22 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 14 KLD
Plantation 6 KLD
Drinking 2 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
11.50 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 17 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 330 to 300 10,00,000 TPA
Second 300 to 289 10,00,000 TPA
Third 289 to 282 10,00,000 TPA
Fourth 282 to 270 10,00,000 TPA
Fifth 270 to 250 10,00,000 TPA
11
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 200 Trees
II Yr. 200 Trees
III Yr. 200 Trees
IV Yr. 200 Trees
V Yr. 200 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions.
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for Production of Stone along with
Associated Minerals as per below mentioned figures.
Year Bench mrl Production
First 330 to 300 10,00,000 TPA
Second 300 to 289 10,00,000 TPA
Third 289 to 282 10,00,000 TPA
Fourth 282 to 270 10,00,000 TPA
Fifth 270 to 250 10,00,000 TPA
[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTO under Air Act and Water Act from
HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the HSPCB.
[3] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved
Mining Plan.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that the mining operations shall not intersect
groundwater table and the mining operation should be restricted at least 3 meter
above the ground water table.
[5] Topsoil shall be stacked temporarily at earmarked sites only and it shall not be
kept unutilized for a period more than three years; it shall be used for land
reclamation and plantation in mined out areas.
[6] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall
be obstructed due to any mining operations.
[7] The over burden generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site (s) only and it
shall not be kept active for long period of time. The maximum height of the
already existing waste dumps shall not exceed 5 meter in single terraces and the
slope angle shall not exceed 28o as per norms.
[8] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the
designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the
overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.
12
[9] The benches height and slope shall be maintained as per approved mining plan.
[10] Waste dump shall be terraced. The height of the dump and its slope shall not
exceed as suggested in the approved mining plan. A retaining wall shall be
constructed at the toe of the dump.
[11] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.
[12] Check dams shall be constructed in the seasonal rivulets to prevent the flow of
fines to low lying areas during rains.
[13] The total waste generated in the present plan period shall be as envisaged, which
shall be accommodated in old dumpsite in addition to the waste already dumped.
Monitoring and management of rehabilitated areas shall continue until the
vegetation becomes self sustaining. Compliance status shall be submitted to
HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly bases.
[14] Drills shall either be operated with dust extractors or equipped with water injection
system.
[15] The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit shall be terraced and plantation
done to stabilize the slopes. The slop of higher benches shall be made gentler for
easy accessibility by local people to use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall
be carried out along the excavated area.
[16] Catch drains and siltation ponds of appropriate size shall be constructed for the
working pit, OB dumps and mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The
water so collected shall be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt
development etc. The drains shall be regularly de-silted, particularly after
monsoon and maintained properly.
[17] Garland drains; setting tanks and check dams of appropriate size, gradient and
length shall be constructed both around the mine pit and over burden dumps and
sump capacity shall be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above peak
sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area
adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity shall also provide adequate pits shall be
constructed at the corners of the garland drains and de-silted.
[18] Dimension of the retaining wall at the toe of dumps and OB benches within the
mine to check run-off and siltation shall be based on the rainfall data.
[19] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the
proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt
should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the
native species around ML area, OB dumps, backfilled and reclaimed around water
body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture Department.
[20] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution
and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading
13
point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality
Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.
[21] The project authority shall implement suitable conservation measures to augment
ground water resources in the area in consultation with the Regional Director,
Central Ground Water Board.
[22] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and
around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre
monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter
(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional
Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.
[23] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana
Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by
MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.
[24] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.
Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and
in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and
shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must
have pollution under control certificate.
[25] Blasting operation shall be carried out only during the daytime. Controlled
blasting shall be practiced. The mitigation measures for control of ground
vibrations and to arrest fly rocks and boulders shall be implemented.
[26] The blasting operation will be carried out as per the norms of Director (Mines &
Safety), Gaziabad. Take all safety measures as per the various mining regulations.
[27] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining
operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in
the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State
Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the
conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the
project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation
plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A
copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,
Chandigarh within 3 months.
[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 11.50
lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures
including recurring expenses per year.
[29] A sum of Rs. 17 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for
investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area
particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural
14
women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should
contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and
improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such
activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA
Haryana before the start of operation.
[30] Budgetary provision of Rs. 05 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in
the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation
facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and
toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at
the time of CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided
for mining labours.
[31] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to
the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral
concession rules 2012.
[32] The water reservoir, which would be created/available during post closure (all
pits), shall be provided with suitable benches and fencing to provide the access to
the water body and safety.
[33] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of
compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s
website and displayed at the project site.
[34] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms
fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.
[35] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened
as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of
the work.
[36] The project proponent shall ensure that all measures are taken simultaneously for
safeguard and maintenance of the health of the workers.
[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
[i] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without
prior approval of the SEIAA.
[ii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and
waste shall not be made.
[iii] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided
based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and
ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in
consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six
15
monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the
HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.
[iv] Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels below 85 dBA in the work
environment. Workers engaged in operations of HEMM etc. shall be provided
with earplugs/muffs.
[v] Waste water (workshop and waste water from the mine) shall be properly
collected & treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed under GSR 422
(E) dated 19th May 93 and 31st December 1993 (amended to date). Oil and grease
trap shall be installed before discharge.
[vi] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they
shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health
aspects.
[vii] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken
periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take
corrective measures, if needed.
[viii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in
separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise
expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF
located at Chandigarh.
[ix] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of
compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data
(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of
MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.
[x] The SEIAA, Haryana reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any
of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of
any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Haryana or any other competent
authorities is not satisfactory.
[xi] Failure to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in
withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
[xii] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and
also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of
Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.
[xiii] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded
Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are
16
available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should
be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in
two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the
same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance
conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.
[xiv] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from
the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,
Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be
obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority
before the start of mining operation.
[xv] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does
not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed
under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete
responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the
time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal
against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if
preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National
Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Stone Along with Associated
Minor Minerals” at Karota over an area of 9.55 Ha. under Category
“B2” in Tehsil-Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by M/s HGEL
Integrated Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s HGEL
Integrated Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Karota” Stone mines
Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Karota over an area of 9.55 Ha in
Tehsil-Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 02.09.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 9.55 Ha having Khasra no. 61
min village- Karota. The project proponent on 19.10.2015 submitted online application
along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining
Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology,
Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this
mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest
Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village- Karota Tehsil-Narnaul, District-
Mahendergarh
17
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals Karota, Khasra no. 61 min, over an area of
9.55 Ha
15,00,000 TPA
4. Project Cost 7.30 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 30 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 19 KLD
Plantation 8 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
16 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 23 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 348 to 330 15,00,000 TPA
Second 330 to 318 15,00,000 TPA
Third 318 to 300 15,00,000 TPA
Fourth 300 to 282 15,00,000 TPA
Fifth 282 to 270 15,00,000 TPA
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 200 Trees
II Yr. 200 Trees
III Yr. 200 Trees
IV Yr. 200 Trees
V Yr. 200 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions.
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for Production of Stone along with
Associated Minerals as per below mentioned figures.
Year Bench mrl Production
First 348 to 330 15,00,000 TPA
Second 330 to 318 15,00,000 TPA
Third 318 to 300 15,00,000 TPA
Fourth 300 to 282 15,00,000 TPA
Fifth 282 to 270 15,00,000 TPA
[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTO under Air Act and Water Act from
HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the HSPCB.
18
[3] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved
Mining Plan.
[4] The project proponent shall ensure that the mining operations shall not intersect
groundwater table and the mining operation should be restricted at least 3 meter
above the ground water table.
[5] Topsoil shall be stacked temporarily at earmarked sites only and it shall not be
kept unutilized for a period more than three years; it shall be used for land
reclamation and plantation in mined out areas.
[6] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall
be obstructed due to any mining operations.
[7] The over burden generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site (s) only and it
shall not be kept active for long period of time. The maximum height of the
already existing waste dumps shall not exceed 5 meter in single terraces and the
slope angle shall not exceed 28o as per norms.
[8] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the
designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the
overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.
[9] The benches height and slope shall be maintained as per approved mining plan.
[10] Waste dump shall be terraced. The height of the dump and its slope shall not
exceed as suggested in the approved mining plan. A retaining wall shall be
constructed at the toe of the dump.
[11] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.
[12] Check dams shall be constructed in the seasonal rivulets to prevent the flow of
fines to low lying areas during rains.
[13] The total waste generated in the present plan period shall be as envisaged, which
shall be accommodated in old dumpsite in addition to the waste already dumped.
Monitoring and management of rehabilitated areas shall continue until the
vegetation becomes self sustaining. Compliance status shall be submitted to
HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly bases.
[14] Drills shall either be operated with dust extractors or equipped with water injection
system.
[15] The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit shall be terraced and plantation
done to stabilize the slopes. The slop of higher benches shall be made gentler for
easy accessibility by local people to use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall
be carried out along the excavated area.
[16] Catch drains and siltation ponds of appropriate size shall be constructed for the
working pit, OB dumps and mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The
water so collected shall be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt
19
development etc. The drains shall be regularly de-silted, particularly after
monsoon and maintained properly.
[17] Garland drains; setting tanks and check dams of appropriate size, gradient and
length shall be constructed both around the mine pit and over burden dumps and
sump capacity shall be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above peak
sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area
adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity shall also provide adequate pits shall be
constructed at the corners of the garland drains and de-silted.
[18] Dimension of the retaining wall at the toe of dumps and OB benches within the
mine to check run-off and siltation shall be based on the rainfall data.
[19] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the
proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt
should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the
native species around ML area, OB dumps, backfilled and reclaimed around water
body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture Department.
[20] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution
and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading
point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality
Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.
[21] The project authority shall implement suitable conservation measures to augment
ground water resources in the area in consultation with the Regional Director,
Central Ground Water Board.
[22] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and
around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre
monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter
(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional
Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.
[23] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana
Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by
MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.
[24] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.
Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and
in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and
shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must
have pollution under control certificate.
[25] Blasting operation shall be carried out only during the daytime. Controlled
blasting shall be practiced. The mitigation measures for control of ground
vibrations and to arrest fly rocks and boulders shall be implemented.
20
[26] The blasting operation will be carried out as per the norms of Director (Mines &
Safety), Gaziabad. Take all safety measures as per the various mining regulations.
[27] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining
operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in
the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State
Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the
conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the
project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation
plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A
copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,
Chandigarh within 3 months.
[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 16
lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures
including recurring expenses per year.
[29] A sum of Rs. 23 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for
investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area
particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural
women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should
contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and
improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such
activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA
Haryana before the start of operation.
[30] Budgetary provision of Rs. 05 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in
the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation
facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and
toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at
the time of CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided
for mining labours.
[31] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to
the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral
concession rules 2012.
[32] The water reservoir, which would be created/available during post closure (all
pits), shall be provided with suitable benches and fencing to provide the access to
the water body and safety.
[33] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of
compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s
website and displayed at the project site.
21
[34] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms
fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.
[35] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened
as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of
the work.
[36] The project proponent shall ensure that all measures are taken simultaneously for
safeguard and maintenance of the health of the workers.
[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
[i] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without
prior approval of the SEIAA.
[ii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and
waste shall not be made.
[iii] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided
based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and
ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in
consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six
monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the
HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.
[iv] Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels below 85 dBA in the work
environment. Workers engaged in operations of HEMM etc. shall be provided
with earplugs/muffs.
[v] Waste water (workshop and waste water from the mine) shall be properly
collected & treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed under GSR 422
(E) dated 19th May 93 and 31st December 1993 (amended to date). Oil and grease
trap shall be installed before discharge.
[vi] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they
shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health
aspects.
[vii] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken
periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take
corrective measures, if needed.
[viii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in
separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise
expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF
located at Chandigarh.
22
[ix] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of
compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data
(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of
MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.
[x] The SEIAA, Haryana reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any
of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of
any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Haryana or any other competent
authorities is not satisfactory.
[xi] Failure to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in
withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.
[xii] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and
also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of
Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.
[xiii] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded
Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are
available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should
be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in
two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the
same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance
conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.
[xiv] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from
the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,
Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be
obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority
before the start of mining operation.
[xv] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does
not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed
under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete
responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the
time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal
against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if
preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National
Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
23
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for proposed Mining of Boulder, Gravel and
Sand (Minor Mineral) at Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19 over an area
of 12.62 Ha. in District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Ganga
Yamuna Mining Co.
The SEAC has recommended to grant Environment Clearance to M/s Ganga
Yamuna Mining Co. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand of “Bhood Kalan Block
/YNR B-19” at Village- Bhood Kalan over an area of 12.62 Ha by imposing stipulations
stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 12.62 Ha having Village-
Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19. The project proponent on 11.09.2015 submitted online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The
Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500
meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2.
NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village- Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19 District
Yamuna Nagar
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor
Mineral) Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19, over area
of 12.62 Ha
2,59,000 TPA @35 Trips/day (25 Mt/Trip)
4. Project Cost 4 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 26 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 12 KLD
Plantation 12 KLD
Drinking 2 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
9.25 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 10.25 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
2,59,000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will
be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 297-
298 armsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
A N 30O 15’21.9” E077O 29’37.4”
B N 30O 15’29.8” E077O 29’37.5”
C N 30O 15’17.5” E077O 29’52.7”
D N 30O 15’21.6” E077O 29’42.2”
24
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 400 Trees
II Yr. 400 Trees
III Yr. 400 Trees
IV Yr. 400 Trees
V Yr. 400 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following conditions.
A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:
[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for the proposed production for the five
years @ 2,59,000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be 9 meter. The
alivation range of mine site is 297-298 armsl. The Corner Coordinates of the
leased area are:
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
A N 30O 15’21.9” E077O 29’37.4”
B N 30O 15’29.8” E077O 29’37.5”
C N 30O 15’17.5” E077O 29’52.7”
D N 30O 15’21.6” E077O 29’42.2”
[2] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved
Mining Plan.
[3] Environmental Clearance is subject to obtaining clearance, under the Wildlife
(Protection) Act, 1972 from the National Board of Wildlife, as applicable to the
project.
[4] No mining activities will be allowed in forest area, if any, for which the Forest
Clearance is not available.
[5] The Project proponent shall obtain consent to Operate from the State Pollution
control Board, Haryana and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated
therein.
[6] Project Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and
Periodical medical examination of the workers engaged in the project and records
maintained; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some
aliments like BP, diabetes, habitual smokers, etc. shall be undertaken once in six
months and necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly.
Recommendations of National Institute for labour for ensuring good occupational
environment for mine workers would also be adopted.
25
[7] Project Proponent shall appoint a Monitoring Committee to monitor the
replenishment study, traffic management, levels of production, River Bank erosion
and maintenance of Road etc.
[8] The number of trips of the trucks shall not exceed the estimated quantity of 875
Mt/day @35 Trips/day (25 Mt/Trip). Transport of minerals shall be done either by
dedicated road or it should be ensured that the trucks/dumpers carrying the mineral
should not be allowed to pass thought the villages.
[9] Project Proponent shall ensure that the road may not be damaged due to
transportation of the mineral; and transport of minerals will be as per IRC
Guidelines with respect to complying with traffic congestion and density.
[10] Excavation will be carried out up to a maximum depth of 3 meters from surface of
mineral deposit and not less than one meter from the water level of the River
channel whichever is reached earlier.
[11] The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively
controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC
only will be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through
covered trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded.
Project should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized
pollution testing centre.
[12] Washing of all transport vehicles should be done inside the mining lease.
[13] Permanent pillars has to be constructed to demarcate width of extraction of ROM
leaving 25% of River width from the bank with depth of 1.5m below the ground
and 1.2 m above the ground to observe its stability.
[14] There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater
harvesting measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director,
Central Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to
augment ground water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground
Water Board.
[15] The Project Proponent shall also take all precautionary measures during mining
operation for conservation and protection of endangered flora/fauna, if any,
spotted in the study area.
[16] Main haulage road in the mine should be provided with permanent water
sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted
with sprinklers.
[17] Provision shall be made for the housing of construction labour within the site with
all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile toilets,
mobile STP, safe drinking water, medical health care, crèche etc. The housing may
26
be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the
project.
[18] No River sand mining shall be allowed in rainy season.
[19] The project proponent shall submit annual replenishment report certified by an
authorized agency. In case the replenishment is lower than the approved rate of
production, then the mining activity/ production levels shall be decreased/ stopped
accordingly till the replenishment is completed.
[20] In River flood plain mining a buffer of 3 meter to be left from the River bank for
mining.
[21] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall
be obstructed due to any mining operations.
[22] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the
designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the
overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.
[23] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.
[24] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the
proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt
should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the
native species around lease boundary and haul roads , backfilled and reclaimed
around water body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture
Department.
[25] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution
and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading
point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality
Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.
[26] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and
around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre
monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter
(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional
Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.
[27] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana
Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by
MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.
[28] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.
Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and
in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and
shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must
have pollution under control certificate.
27
[29] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining
operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in
the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State
Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the
conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the
project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation
plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A
copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,
Chandigarh within 3 months.
[30] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 9.25
lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures
including recurring expenses per year.
[31] A sum of Rs. 10.25 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for
investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area
particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural
women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should
contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and
improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such
activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA
Haryana before the start of operation.
[32] Budgetary provision of Rs. 05 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in
the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation
facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and
toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at
the time of CTE/CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided
for mining labours.
[33] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to
the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral
concession rules 2012..
[34] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of
compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s
website and displayed at the project site.
[35] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms
fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.
[36] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened
as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of
the work.
[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.
28
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
[i] Concealing factual data or submission of false/fabricated data and failure to
comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in withdrawal of
this clearance and attract action under the provisions of the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986.
[ii] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without
prior approval of the SEIAA.
[iii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and
waste shall not be made.
[iv] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,
SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided
based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and
ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in
consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six
monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the
HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.
[v] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they
shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health
aspects.
[vi] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken
periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take
corrective measures, if needed.
[vii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in
separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise
expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF
located at Chandigarh.
[viii] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of
compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data
(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of
MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.
[ix] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water
(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of
Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public
Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and
also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of
Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.
[x] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded
Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are
29
available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should
be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in
two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the
same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance
conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.
[xi] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from
the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,
Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be
obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority
before the start of mining operation.
[xii] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does
not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed
under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete
responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the
time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal
against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if
preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National
Green Tribunal Act, 2010.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for proposed Special Economic Zone at Village
Behrampur, Balola & Bandhwari, Gurgaon by M/s G.P.Realtors Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Special
Economic Zone at Village Behrampur, Balola & Bandhwari, Gurgaon on a plot area of
38.12 acres (1st phase for EC 12.5835 acre). The total built up area shall be 103807.64
sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 Basement + GF + 5 Floors. The maximum
height of the building shall be 30.45 meter. The total water requirement shall be 636
KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 370 KLD. The waste water generation shall
be 296 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 300 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 6250 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 34.48% of project area (23% tree
plantation + 11.48% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 12 rain
water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 1.5 ton/day (OWC proposed for
1716 kg/day). The total parking spaces proposed are 1299 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, HT line, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
30
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was noticed that the project proponent has
not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable
waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of
bio-degradable waste. It was noticed that for disposal of 32 KLD of waste water from
labour camp the project proponent has proposed to provide soak pit. It was observed that
the project proponent should provide mobile STP/STP for treatment of waste water
generated from the labour camp during construction phase. It was also noticed that the
capacity of STP proposed to be set up in operation phase is inadequate. The project
proponent is required to revise the capacity of STP from proposed 300 KLD.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the
submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-
degradable waste; provision of mobile STP/STP for treatment of waste water generation
from the labour camp and adequately revised capacity of STP within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and shall
maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity Rules,
1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[2] The project proponent shall set up STP of 350 KLD capacity in operation phase.
[3] The project proponent shall provide STP/mobile STP for treatment of 32 KLD of
waste water proposed to be generated from the labour camp during construction
phase.
[4] Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities shall be provided for construction
workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. Open defecation
by the laboures is strictly prohibited. The safe disposal of solid wastes/ waste water
generated during the construction phase should be ensured. Efforts shall be made to
provide mobile STP for treatment of waste water during the construction phase.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the following information within 15 days.
(i) Capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,
dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment
of bio-degradable waste.
(ii) Provision of mobile STP/STP for treatment of 32 KLD of waste water
generation from the labour camp during construction phase.
(iii) Revised capacity of STP to be set up during operation phase.
31
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project
measuring (18.675 + 5.88472 = 24.55972 acres) at Vilalge Dhorka,
Sector-95, Gurgaon, Haryana by Benchmark Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for construction of Group
Housing Project measuring (18.675 + 5.88472 = 24.55972 acres) at Vilalge Dhorka,
Sector-95, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 99389.6 sqm (24.55 Acres). The total
built up area shall be 287179.9 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 Basements
+ GF + 17 floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 26.5 meter. The total
water requirement shall be 1201 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 694 KLD.
The waste water generation shall be 902 KLD, which will be treated in the STP 1100
capacity.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of
water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It
was noticed that the project proponent has proposed to use excavated Top soil for use of
landscaping and has proposed to stack the same in the project area covering the same
with Tarpaulin. The project proponent is required to give exact quantum of Top soil to be
excavated and also brief description for its preservation in order to control its erosion. It
was noticed that the project proponent has proposed to reuse construction debris and
demolition debris; the project proponent is required to submit the details of the same. The
project proponent has not discussed the storm water management during construction
phase the project proponent is required to submit the same. It was noticed that the project
proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity and dimensions of OWC to be installed
for treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer to this case with
the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below
mentioned observation within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit details regarding provision made for
preservation of Top Soil in the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall submit details of reuse of construction
debris/demolition debris during construction phase.
[3] The project proponent shall submit capacity and dimensions of OWC proposed to
be installed for treatment of bio-degradable waste.
32
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of commercial colony project
located at Sector-6 & 11 in Revenue Estate of Ratgal, District-
Kurukshetra, Haryana by M/s Divine Vision Infraestate Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent
under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the project proponent has completed the
construction of Commercial Colony project without obtaining prior environmental
clearance. The SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated
12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of
OM of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter
no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF &
CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view the
quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF &
CC, GOI has been received.
In view of the above the Authority decided to keep this case pending till
clarification is received from MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
at Village Badshahpur, Sector-65, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Manglam
Multiplex Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 128th meeting held on 26-02-2016 has referred this case to the
SEIAA for rejecting the environment clearance application on the grounds that the
project proponent has submitted separate application for the additional licensed area of
3.518 acres (2.081 acres + 1.437 acres of license no. 114 & 122 of 2014) which is in
contagious with the existing project area of 254925.63 sqm (license no. 234 of 2007, 52
of 2009 and 35 of 2010).
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up in the today’s meeting. It was noticed
that the project proponent has submitted fresh application for obtaining environmental
clearance for 3.518 acres of additional license which is in contiguity with the existing
project area of 254925.63 sqm for which the environmental clearance was granted by
SEIAA vides letter no. 1092 dated 28.10.2009 and subsequently the extension of validity
of EC was also granted to the project proponent vide letter no. 61 dated 05.01.2015. The
existing project proposal is under initial stage of construction and the project proponent is
required to submit the application for the additional area of 3.518 acre (license no. 122
and 114 of 2014) in conjunction with the existing project under expansion.
In view of the above the Authority accepted the recommendation of SEAC and
decided to reject the application. It was also decided that the project proponent may be
asked to submit fresh application for additional area of 3.518 acres in conjunction with
the existing project under expansion.
33
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for Revision/Modification of Group Housing
Project (37.512 acres) at Sector-67A, Village Dhumsapur and
Maidawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Precision Realtors Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 128th meeting held on 26.02.2016 has recommended this project
for environment clearance. The project proponent for seeking environment clearance for
Revision/Modification of Group Housing Project (37.512 acres) at Sector-67A, Village
Dhumsapur and Maidawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana with the proposal as given under:
Details EC Granted After revision Difference
Plot Area 37.512 acres nil nil
Built up area 812877.08 sqm 804646.73 sqm -8230.35 sqm
Green Area 45.02% 45.02% Nil
No. of Dwelling
units
1780 1685 -95
EWS units 315 315 Nil
Parking 3545 ECS 3752 ECS 208 ECS
Power Demand 15174.7 KW 14845.1 KW -329.5 KW
RWH pits 20 pits 26 pits 6 pits
Solid Waste 4.8 TPD 4.410 TPD -0.390 TPD
Total Water
Requirement
2359 KLD 1758 KLD -601 KLD
Waste water
generation
1320 KLD 1120 KLD -200 KLD
Treated Water 1254 KLD 923 KLD -331 KLD
STP capacity 2300 KLD 2300 KLD nil
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not proposed any change in the DG set configuration
whereas water consumption for cooling has been reduced in the revised
submission. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[2] The project proponent has proposed to reduce Dwelling units by 5.4% in revision
application whereas the water requirement has been proposed to be reduced by
24.43% .The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[3] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water demand for
maintenance/Arboriculture by 60.54%. The project proponent is required to justify
the same.
[4] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water requirement
by 24.77% . The project proponent is required to justify the same.
[5] The project proponent in the revised proposal has proposed the reduction of waste
water generation by 15% whereas the treated waste water has been shown reduced
by 26%. The project proponent is required to justify the same.
[6] On page 50 of presentation the diameter of recharge pit has been shown as 25
meter against the requirement of 2.5 meter. The project proponent is required to
clarify the same.
34
[7] The project proponent in the revision application has calculated water requirement
for visitors @ 10% whereas the solid waste generation has been calculated @ 5%.
The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[8] The project proponent has not submitted the details regarding treatment of bio-
degradable waste. The project proponent is required to submit the details regarding
treatment of bio-degradable waste within the project area and should submit a plan
earmarking space for management of bio-degradable waste.
In view of the above observations the Authority decided to defer to this case with
the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above
observation within 15 days.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group
Housing” project at Village-Mujeri, Sector-70, Faridabad, Haryana by
M/s Agrasain Spaces.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Affordable Group Housing” project at Village-Mujeri, Sector-70, Faridabad, Haryana on
a total plot area of 21650.85 sqm (5.35 acre). The total built up area shall be 49375.498
sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 07 Towers Stilt + 14 Floors & Stilt + 06
Floors. The Group Housing project shall have 720 Dwelling Units, Commercial 1 & 2,
Aaganwadi cum Creche, Community Hall. The maximum height of the building shall be
44.5 meter. The total water requirement shall be 519 KLD. The fresh water requirement
shall be 346 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 427 KLD, which will be treated in
the STP of 515 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3044 KW which will
be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on
4256.79 sqm (21.04%) of project area (13.04 tree plantation + 8% landscaping). The
Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste
generation will be 1688 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project
area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed
are 720 Scooter 390 ECS.
In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were
taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding HT line, gas pipe
line, water requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air
Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has
submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water,
sewerage connection and drainage system and NOC from DFO regarding Non
involvement of Forest land. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted
calculations and detail of the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable
waste and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.
35
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.
[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 21.04% of project area.
[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably
equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may
be.
[4] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[5] The project proponent shall not raise any construction in the ROW reserved
for Gas Pipe Line.
[6] Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities shall be provided for construction
workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. Open defecation
by the laboures is strictly prohibited. The safe disposal of solid wastes/ waste water
generated during the construction phase should be ensured. Efforts shall be made to
provide mobile STP for treatment of waste water during the construction phase.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for Regarding Extension of validity period
by 5 years of Environmental Clearance Letter issued for the project
“Uniworld Resorts”-Residential ploted colony with other
infrastructure Amenities at Sector-33 & 48, Gurgaon by M/s Unitech
Residential Resorts Ltd.
The project proposal relates to grant of extension of validity of EC. The project
proponent on 12.06.2013 submitted application seeking extension of validity of EC of the
environmental clearance granted by MoEF & CC, GoI on 03.12.2007 for the project. The
case was lastly taken up by SEIAA in its 77th meeting held on 14.11.2014. The project
proponent vide letter 13.11.2014 informed that the civil construction work of the project
has already been completed as per approved plans and within the validity of EC letters
and requested for withdrawal of the application. The SEIAA decided to refer back this
case to SEAC to inspect the site and to assess the status of construction. The sub-
committee tried to contact the project proponent for doing inspection. The report is
incomplete and not signed by other member.
The case was taken up in the today’s meeting, it was observed that the project
proponent vide letter on. URRL/Uniworld Resorts/EC/2402/2016 dated 24.02.2016 has
intimated that they have obtained Consent to Operate from the HSPCB on 13.02.2016 it
was noticed that the MoEF & CC, GoI has granted EC to the project proponent under
category 8(b) as the project area is more than 50 Ha and as per provision contained in
36
para 9 of EIA Notification 14.09.2006 the validity period of item 8(b) is limited only to
such activities as may be the responsibility of the applicant as a developer. It was not
clear whether the project proponent has carried out construction of the project as per
approved plans. The Authority decided that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri
Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site to check whether
the construction raised by the project proponent is in accordance with the approved plans
or not and shall submit the report to the SEIAA. Accordingly the case was deferred.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for Expansion and Modernization of DLF
Commercial Project Corporate Green (IT Office, Retail and
Studio/Service Apartment) at Sector-74A, Gurgaon by M/s DLF
Universal Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 87th meeting held on 05.02.2016 wherein the
Authority decided that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.
Mishra, Members SEAC shall monitor the compliance of the conditions imposed in the
EC letter and shall submit the report to the SEIAA and the case was deferred.
In the today’s meeting the report dated 14.03.2016 of sub-committee was taken up
for consideration. It was found that the sub-committee in its report has reported that the
project proponent is complying with the conditions imposed in the EC letter. The
Authority decided to accept the recommendation of SEAC and to grant environmental
clearance for Expansion and Modernization of DLF Commercial Project Corporate Green
(IT Office, Retail and Studio/Service Apartment) at Sector-74A, Gurgaon by imposing
standard conditions as recommended by SEAC and subject to the following additional
conditions.
[1] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken
either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the
project area.
[2] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing
through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends
of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the
message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not
be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall
not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.
[3] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW
reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and
shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity
Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.
[4] Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities shall be provided for construction
workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. Open defecation
by the laboures is strictly prohibited. The safe disposal of solid wastes/ waste water
37
generated during the construction phase should be ensured. Efforts shall be made to
provide mobile STP for treatment of waste water during the construction phase.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for Mining of “Brick Earth”
The matter regarding grant of environmental clearance to the project proponents
engaged in mining of “Brick Earth” required for brick-kiln units was taken up in the
today’s meeting. It was informed that in compliance of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
Orders the SEIAA started receiving the applications from Brick-Kiln owners for
environmental clearance of their Mining projects. The SEIAA in October 2012 received
118 applications for environmental clearance. The applications could not be appraised as
there was no set procedure and the requirement of environmental clearance was
challenged in the Hon’ble NGT. Now MoEF&CC, GoI vide amended Notification SO
141 (E) dated 15.01.2016 has prescribed procedure for granting environmental clearance
to the Mining projects having project area less than 5 Ha. As per this amended
Notification the 118 applications pending with SEIAA now require environment
clearance from the DEIAA/DEAC under category B2.
In view of the above it was decided to file all the 118 applications pending with
SEIAA as environmental clearance applications in case of these projects shall now be
processed at the level of DEIAA/DEAC under category B2 projects.
******
1
Minutes of the 90th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 22.04.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. At the outset the Authority discussed the issue
regarding provision for adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities for construction
workers at site. The Authority observed that as per the reports/complaints being received
by SEIAA the project proponents are not providing sanitary facilities and not maintaining
hygienic conditions for construction workers at site. It was found that most of the project
proponents are not submitting the details regarding quantum of requirement of drinking
water along with its source; waste water generation and its treatment at site in the labour
camp area. In certain cases the project proponents are giving exaggerated values of
drinking water requirement during construction phase; not matching with the labour
employed, which can lead to misuse of potable water i.e for use in construction activities
despite the imposition of blanket ban on the use of potable water/ground water for
construction purposes. It was felt by the Authority that to examine the impact of project
activity during construction phase on water regime, this information is of vital
importance as project proponents are required to provide sufficient drinking water and
also the provision for treatment of waste water. Accordingly it was decided that the
project proponents may be advised to furnish the additional information as given under:
1. The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculation of drinking water
requirement and its source for construction workers.
2. The project proponent shall submit the detail calculation of waste water generation
during construction phase in the labour camp area and also the treatment of waste
water. The project proponent shall provide STP for treatment of waste water if the
waste water generation is 10 KLD and above.
It was also decided to incorporate the above requirement in the check list and
upload the modified check list on Haryana Portal. Thereafter the Cases recommended by
SEAC for Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated
vide letter No. 252-254 dated 12.04.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were
taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for proposed commercial colony INXT CITY
CENTER at village Shikopur, Sector-83, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Trishul Industries.
This case was lastly considered in the 83rd Meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
(i) The project proponent has not submitted assurance of water supply from
competent authority and shall obtain the same and submit the same to SEAC.
2
(ii) The project proponent has not submitted assurance of power supply from
competent authority and shall obtain the same and submit the same to SEAC.
(iii) The project proponent shall obtain copy of valid accreditation certificate issued
by NABET/QCI in respect of EIA consultant engaged by them and submit the
same to the SEAC.
(iv) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non
applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.
indicated the license.
(v) The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking declaring that no
construction has been started at the site along with photograph to the SEAC.
(vi) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
The SEAC in its 129th meeting held on 14.03.2016 considered the reply dated
22.12.2015 and the same was found in order. The SEAC has again recommended this
case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was found that the project proponent has not
given detailed calculations of drinking water for construction workers along with source;
waste water generation and its treatment scheme in the labour camp area during
construction phase. It was also observed that in the solid waste management plan the
project proponent has proposed to use empty cement bags for making of road; the project
proponent is required to explain the same with proper justification. It was noticed that in
the water balance diagram the project proponent has proposed to use 133 KLD of treated
water for HVAC make-up; the project proponent is required to justify the same.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the following information within
15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for
STP/Mobile STP in case waste water generation is 10 KLD and above.
[2] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of
empty cement bag for making of road.
[3] The project proponent shall justify with authenticated calculation the use of 133
KLD for HVAC make-up.
3
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for the Project “Vatika Express City”
Resedential plotted Colony on total land measuring 100.875 acres
located in the revenue estate of village Harsaru, Hayatpur, Sector-88A
and 88B, Distt-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vatika Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 83rd Meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
(i) The project proponent shall submit self contained note with authenticated proof
about the shifting of HT lines and showing that the vacant unplanned pockets in
the licensed area are actually affected by the existence of HT lines. The proposed
plan of the said un planned pocket areas, once HT lines are shifted.
(ii) The project proponent shall submit revised green belt development plan
earmarking space of make provision for green-park for the residents as per
assurance given in the meeting.
(iii)The project proponent shall provide Old age home on 0.25 acre of licensed area
and shall submit a plan.
(iv)The project proponent shall submit dual plumbing plan showing layout of infra
structure facilities without crossing revenue rasta.
The SEAC in its 129th meeting held on 14.03.2016 considered the reply dated
24.11.2015 and the same was found in order. The SEAC has again recommended this
case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was found that the project proponent has not
given detailed calculations of drinking water for construction workers along with source;
waste water generation and its treatment scheme in the labour camp area during
construction phase. It was also observed that in the solid waste management plan the
project proponent has proposed to use empty cement bags for making of road; the project
proponent is required to explain the same with proper justification. It was noticed that in
the water balance diagram the project proponent has proposed to use 03 KLD of treated
water for DG set cooling; the project proponent is required to justify the same.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory submission of the following information within 15
days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of
empty cement bag for making of road.
4
[3] The project proponent shall justify with authenticated calculation the use of 03
KLD of treated water for DG set cooling.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony “Happy Homes” located in the revenue estate of
Village Budena, Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Auric Homes
Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
(i) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan
showing area ear marked for composting.
(ii) The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
(iii)The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.
The SEAC in its 129th meeting held on 15.03.2016 considered the reply dated
24.02.2016 wherein the project proponent claimed deemed clearance under para 8 of EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006 and decided that the subject matter regarding deemed
clearance does not fall under the preview of SEAC and referred the case to SEIAA for
taking decision.
In the today’s meeting the letter dated 15.03.2016 claiming deemed clearance
under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 was taken up for consideration along with the
copy of reply to the above observations. It was noticed that the project proponent
informed that their project proposal was recommended for environmental clearance by
SEAC in its 118th meeting held on 03.03.2015 and no decision was conveyed to them
within 45 days after the recommendation of SEAC and as such their project proposal
becomes deemed cleared. It was also noticed that the project proponent has submitted an
undertaking stating that the construction activity at the site was started in June 2015
which shows that project proponent started the construction after the expiry of 45 days
from the date of recommendation of SEAC but failed to submit any authenticated proof
in support of his contention. It was also observed that in the solid waste management plan
the project proponent has proposed to use empty cement bags for making of road; the
project proponent is required to explain the same with proper justification.
5
In view of the above the Authority decided to defer this case to the next meeting
with the decision that the project proponent shall submit the following information within
15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of authenticated document establishing
that the construction activity was undertaken after the expiry of 45 days of
recommendation of SEAC.
[2] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of
empty cement bag for making of road.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project at
Village Khanpur and Kawarsika, Sector-17, Sohna, Tehsil Nuh, Mewat,
Haryana by M/s Goldsouk Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 118th meeting held on 03 & 04 March 2015 has recommended the
project for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken
up by SEIAA due to expiry of its term in March 2015. The case file was transferred to
MoEF, GoI for further action.The recommendation of SEAC was considered by MoEF &
CC, GoI and it was observed that:
[1] There is no clarity on source of water supply during operational phase of the
project, and its sustainability. In case of ground water withdrawal, the project
needs to be examined by CGWA vis-à-vis cumulative water withdrawal and
the recharging/replenishment in the area.
[2] For surface water availability, the PP needs to provide firm commitment from
HUDA, considering overall water balance of the area.
[3] Impact on ambient air quality due to increased traffic volume needs to
be evaluated.
[4] The project site has to be in conformity with the land use as per the
regional plan approved by NCR Planning Board the PP needs to provide
necessary confirmation in this regard.
[5] It is not clear from the documents submitted by the Project Proponent
whether the project is in sewered area or unsewered area. If it is in unsewered
area then how the disposal of treated effluent especially in rainy season is
proposed.
The project proponent vide letter dated 30.10.2015 submitted the reply which was
taken up by SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015. The SEAC observed that the
project proponent has failed to submit the reply in respect of Sr. No. 2 above and advised
the project proponent to submit the complete reply. The project proponent vide letter
dated 04.01.2016 submitted the reply which was again considered by SEAC in its 129th
meeting held on 15.03.2016 and the same was found in order. The SEAC has again
recommended this case for Environmental Clearance.
6
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration along with copy of
the reply submitted by the project proponent in the today’s meeting. The Authority after
discussions observed that:
[1] The project proponent was asked to submit reply with respect to observation
“Impact on ambient air quality due to increased traffic volume needs to be
evaluated” whereas the project proponent has given a vague reply. The project
proponent is required to give the values of existing AAQ of the project area,
predicted values of AAQ due to increased traffic volume and detailed mitigation
measures to be adopted for management of environment.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 182 KLD to water tankers for
construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the
advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the
Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed
in the notification.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
measuring 13.2118 Acres at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, Dpistrict
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
1. Since the height of building is 94.20 meter hence clearance from the recognize
institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering College/National Institute of
Technology etc regarding structural stability and for fire safety clearance from
institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The project proponent shall obtain
the same and submit to the SEAC.
2. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste.
7
3. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that:
“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60
meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise
building shall also be made”.
4. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.
The SEAC in its 129th meeting held on 15.03.2016 considered the reply dated
03.12.2015 and the same was found in order. The SEAC has again recommended this
case for Environmental Clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration along with copy of
the reply submitted by the project proponent in the today’s meeting. The Authority after
discussions observed that:
[1] The proposed built up area of the project 149449.28 sqm. The SEAC is required to
calculate the built up area as clarified in the MoEF OM F. No, 19-127/2011-IA-III
dated 02.04.2012 and thereafter re-appraise the project proposal as per procedure
prescribed in the Notification if the proposed built up area found to be 15,0000
sqm or above.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 230 KLD to water tankers for
construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the
advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the
Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed
in the notification.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of 12.5 MLD CETP (in two
modules of 6.25 MLD each) in HSIIDC Industrial Area, Bahadurgarh,
Jhajjar, Haryana by HSIIDC Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of 12.5
MLD CETP (in two modules of 6.25 MLD each) in HSIIDC Industrial Area,
8
Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar, Haryana on a the total developed area of Industrial Estate is 732
Acres set up prior to 14.09.2006 and project proponent has earmarked 6.73 acres of
land for setting up of CETP of 12.5 MLD capacity in two modules of 6.25 MLD
capacities each. The project proponent has also proposed green belt on 8908 sqm
(32.7% Acre) i.e. 6060 sqm green belt plantation + 2250 sqm Avenue plantation + 598
sqm Lawn area). The units in this Industrial Estate are mostly green and orange
category and are less water intensive. The major types of industries are General
Engineering, Automobile related assembling, workshops, Footwear Industries,
Readymade garments and Corrugated Paper boxes etc.
The technology for proposed CETP is CMAS (Continuous Mixed
Aeration System) with following treatment units i.e. Screen Chamber, Oil cum grease
removal traps, Grit removal system / Pre- settlers, Equalization tank. Flash
mixing Tanks, Primary Clarifier, Aeration Tank, Secondary clarifier, ludge
handing system- Filter press, Tertiary Treatment Pump House, Dual Media Pressure
Filers and other necessary attached auxiliary units.
The power requirement is 800 KVA sourced from UHBVN. The Source of
water supply is through Bahadurgarh water supply channel. The present waste water
generated is 3.5 MLD from the existing units of about 189 out of total 658 units. The
chemical sludge generated would be of 2.5ton/day which will be disposed of to
GEPIL TSDF, Pali at Faridabad with prior consent from HSPCB.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority observed that the project is eco-friendly and the establishment
of CETP is for treatment of effluent from the industries will help to maintain the
sustainability.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions as recommended by SEAC except condition at serial no.(ii) of Specific
Conditions.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for our Educational Project “Amity
University” at Village Panchgaon, Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Amity University.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal
from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.
Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued
by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
9
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony project at Village Dhamlaka, Sector-26 & 27, Rewari,
Haryana by M/s B.M Gupta Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony project at Village Dhamlaka, Sector-26 & 27, Rewari,
Haryana on a total plot area of 24179.929 sqm (5.975 acre). The total built up area shall
be 63177.86 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 4 Towers, Tower P-01 (GF + 24
Floors), Tower P-02 (Commercial), Tower P-03 (GF + 23 Floors) and Tower P-04 GF +
11 Floors). The maximum height of the building shall be 75.45 meter.
The Authority observed that:
[1] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 221.6 KLD of treated water in
the Drain which is not acceptable. The project proponent is required to submit
revised proposal ensuring that the treated waste water is recycled/reused and
excess of treated waste water is discharged in public sewer system.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The height of the building is 75.45 meters the project proponent is required to
obtained structural stability certificate from the competent authority.
[4] The project proponent has given different figures of stack height 2.82 meter (in
presentation copy) and 6.32 meter (in conceptual plan) above the building height.
The project proponents clarify the same.
[5] The project proponent has not discussed in detail the storm water management
plan during construction phase. The project proponent is required to submit the
same.
[6] In the soil investigation report it has been mentioned that the ground water table
was encountered at 9.5 to 9.9 meter depth, whereas as per Draft Revised Regional
Plan-2021 the average ground water table of Rewari is 16.3 meter. The project
proponent is required to clarify the same with authenticated proof/document.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out
above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the
Notification.
10
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
located at Sector-2, Sohna, Haryana by M/s Metro Techno Build Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony located at Sector-2, Sohna, Haryana on a total plot area of 49068.13 sqm
(12.125 acres). The total built up area shall be 110780.54 sqm. The proposed project shall
have 8 Tower; Convenient Shopping, Nursery School, Community Building and EWS
units (130 Nos.). The maximum height of the building shall be 65.1 meter. The total
water requirement shall be 617 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 400 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 492 KLD which will be treated in the STP 600 KLD
capacity.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority after discussions observed that
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for
preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The project proponent shall give the details of area required for storage of STP
sludge.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony
Project located at Village Dhunela, Sector-34, Sohna, District-
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s CHD Develpers Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony located at Village Dhunela, Sector-34, Sohna, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana on a total plot area of 40569.671 sqm (10.025 acres). The total built up area
shall be 97119.995 sqm. The proposed project shall have 12 Tower; GF + Maximum 15
Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 49.95 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 271.7 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 173.5 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 343 KLD which will be treated in the 3 STPs 395 KLD
(320 + 65 + 10) capacities.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority after discussions observed that
11
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for
preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use drip irrigation for horticulture and
landscaping and has proposed to use 6 lit/sqm of treated water. The project
proponent is required to justify the use of 6 lit/sqm of treated water with
authenticated proof.
[4] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of
empty cement bag for making of road.
[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking on the non-judicial stamp paper
declaring that:
(i) They will not discharge treated/untreated waste water in the nallah passing
through the project area.
(ii) The natural flow of nallah shall not be obstructed.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of POL Terminal at Piyala,
Near Faridabad, Haryana by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The SEAC in its 94th meeting held on 12.11.2013 approved the TOR and in its
104th meeting held on 12.05.2014 recommended this case for environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered by SEIAA in its 72nd meeting and the
same was referred back to SEAC with the advice to ask the project proponent to get the
public hearing conducting as there is no exemption of public hearing stage in view of the
provisions of Notification.
In the 122nd meeting of SEAC held on 26.11.2015 the project proponent informed
the committee that their case was appraised by EAC of MoEF & CC, GoI in its 44th
meeting held on 21.07.2015 and certain observations were raised. The project proponent
on 19.08.2015 submitted the reply to the observations raised by EAC of MoEF. The reply
submitted by the project proponent was discussed and it was observed by SEAC that the
project proponent has failed to submit complete reply to the observations pointed out by
EAC of MoEF, GoI.
The project proponent on 23.02.2016 submitted a letter which was considered in
the 129th meeting of SEAC held on 14.03.2016. It was pointed out by the project
proponent that their case was appeared in 3rd and 5th EAC meetings held on 18 & 19 Jan.
12
2016 and 25 & 26 Feb. 2016 respectively where in the MoEF has suggested to withdraw
the case from SEAC, Haryana.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority decided to accept the recommendation of SEAC for withdrawal
of the application as requested by project proponent subject to the submission of copy of
environmental clearance letter in the office of SEIAA by the project proponent as and
when the same is accorded by MOEF & CC, GOI. It was also decided to forwarded the
copy of withdrawal letter to MOEF & CC, GOI for information
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
“MICASA” at Sector 68 (HD), Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Pareena Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Project “MICASA” at Sector 68 (HD), Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana on a
total plot area of 54562.753 sqm (13.48275 acres). The total built up area shall be
149385.579 sqm. The proposed project shall have 08 Towers; Stilt + Maximum 35
Floors. The Group Housing project shall have 952 Dwelling Units. The maximum height
of the building shall be 115.25 meter. The total water requirement shall be 925.035 KLD.
The fresh water requirement shall be 520.28 KLD. The waste water generation shall be
610.036 KLD which will be treated in the STP 735 KLD capacity.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority after discussions observed that
[1] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of treated water for DG set
cooling of 3000 KVA capacity (power backup only). The project proponent is
required to explain the same with proper justification and calculation.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Plotted
Colony” project located at Sector 6, Agroha, Dist Hisar, Haryana by
Office of the Executive Engineer HUDA.
This case was lastly considered in the 88th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.02.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations.
[1] The project proponent has proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by adopting
OWC but the details of OWC capacity and area on the plan was not earmarked.
13
[2] The project proponent has proposed to treat waste water in the common STP but
the details of common STP its location on the plan and the status of development
of STP was not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit location of
STP and its status of development.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to recycle and re-use the treated water the
details of which were not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit
dual plumbing plan and re-use/recycle of treated water.
[4] The project proponent is required to submit the name and designation of the
officer who shall be responsible for implementation of the stipulated conditions
and safeguards of environment clearance.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 01.04.2016 submitted by project proponent
was taken for discussion and the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed project 15 Acres “Cyber Park”
at Village-Fazilpur, Jharsa & Bhadshahpur, Sector-69, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Unitech Limited.
This case was lastly considered in the 89th meeting of SEIAA held on 28.03.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for
preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding disposal method of
construction debris in the low lying area as reported in the EIA/EMP.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the claim that the carrying capacity of NH-8 is
much higher than the proposed traffic volume and traffic movement from the
proposed project will not create any congestion on NH-8 with calculations and
authenticated proof.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 12.04.2016 submitted by project proponent
was taken for discussion. It was noticed that the project proponent has claimed that they
don’t have any analysis data of any Government agency for comparison with the analysis
carried out by their consultant who is QCI/NABET approved consultant. The Authority
decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to
this project by imposing the usual conditions in practice subject to submission of an
undertaking by the project proponent on non-judicial stamp paper declaring that:
[1] That, no data is available on traffic survey for NH-8 at Gurgaon from any Govt.
Agency, hence data collected for the proposed 15 Acre “Cyber Park” at sector-
69. Gurgaon cannot be compared with any authentic data.
14
[2] That the traffic analysis is done by QCI/NABET accredited consultant M/s Perfact
Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. as per MoEF & CC, GoI approved Construction
Manual.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project
measuring (18.675 + 5.88472 = 24.55972 acres) at Vilalge Dhorka,
Sector-95, Gurgaon, Haryana by Benchmark Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 89th meeting of SEIAA held on 28.03.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations.
[1] The project proponent shall submit details regarding provision made for
preservation of Top Soil in the project area.
[2] The project proponent shall submit details of reuse of construction
debris/demolition debris during construction phase.
[3] The project proponent shall submit capacity and dimensions of OWC proposed to
be installed for treatment of bio-degradable waste.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 14.04.2016 submitted by project proponent
was taken for discussion and the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for Revision/Modification of Group Housing
Project (37.512 acres) at Sector-67A, Village Dhumsapur and
Maidawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Precision Realtors Pvt.
Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 89th meeting of SEIAA held on 28.03.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations.
[1] The project proponent has not proposed any change in the DG set configuration
whereas water consumption for cooling has been reduced in the revised
submission. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[2] The project proponent has proposed to reduce Dwelling units by 5.4% in revision
application whereas the water requirement has been proposed to be reduced by
24.43% .The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[3] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water demand for
maintenance/Arboriculture by 60.54%. The project proponent is required to justify
the same.
[4] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water requirement
by 24.77% . The project proponent is required to justify the same.
[5] The project proponent in the revised proposal has proposed the reduction of waste
water generation by 15% whereas the treated waste water has been shown reduced
by 26%. The project proponent is required to justify the same.
15
[6] On page 50 of presentation the diameter of recharge pit has been shown as 25
meter against the requirement of 2.5 meter. The project proponent is required to
clarify the same.
[7] The project proponent in the revision application has calculated water requirement
for visitors @ 10% whereas the solid waste generation has been calculated @ 5%.
The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[8] The project proponent has not submitted the details regarding treatment of bio-
degradable waste. The project proponent is required to submit the details regarding
treatment of bio-degradable waste within the project area and should submit a plan
earmarking space for management of bio-degradable waste.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 11.04.2016 submitted by project proponent
was taken for discussion and the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice.
Item No.[17] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the Environmental
Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006;
for development of Residential Plotted Colony (281.577 Acre) Namely
“Vatika India Next” at Sector- 81, 82, 82A, 83 and 85, Village-Simi,
Shikhopur and Sikandarpur, Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.
It was informed that M/s Vatika Ltd. has submitted reply to the show-cause notice
issued by SEIAA. The Authority was further informed that the project proponent has
been given opportunity to appear in person for personal hearing in the today’s meeting. It
was noticed that the project proponent vide letter 21.04.2016 has intimated that due to
non-availability of their advocate; they are unable to participate and requested to grant 10
days period for appearance in person with the complete details of the case. The Authority
acceded to the request of the applicant and deferred the case with the decision that the
authorized person/advocate shall appear before the Authority in the next meeting of
SEIAA for personal hearing.
*****
1
Minutes of the 91st meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held
on. 06.05.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 349-351 dated 05.05.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex
project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sec-93, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Complex project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sec-93, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana on a total plot area of 8093.700 sqm (2 Acre). The total built up area shall be
25097.995 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 basements + GF + 6 Floors.
The maximum height of the building shall be 34.1 meter. The total water requirement
shall be 177 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 27 KLD. The waste water
generation shall be 70 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 90 KLD capacity.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The License no. 44 of 2010 measuring 128.94 Acres has been granted for
development of plotted colony. The total saleable area of the license is 47.844
Acres (45.884 Acres for plotted development + 2 Acres for commercial). The
commercial pocket earmarked in the approved layout plan is integral part of
plotted colony and the separate application for environmental clearance for the
commercial pocket (2 Acre) cannot be considered as the license has been granted
for plotted colony and not for development of commercial project.
[2] The present proposal of independent commercial complex is also practically not
viable as the commercial area is in continuation of the plotted colony area and for
access to the commercial pocket the project proponent shall have to use land of
plotted area. Therefore the project proponent is required to seek environmental
clearance for plotted colony along with the commercial complex.
[3] The proposal submitted by the project proponent for independent commercial
complex do not conform to the approved layout plan because as per approved
layout plan the project proponent is also required to develop the below mentioned
units in 2 Acres of commercial complex:
(i) Clinic (2 nos. of 250 sqm each)
(ii) ATM (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)
2
(iii) Beauty parlor (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)
(iv) Multipurpose booth (2 nos. of 5x5.5 meter each)
(v) Sub Post Office (1 no. of 40 sqm)
Where as, the project proponent has failed to show the above units in the
commercial pocket.
[4] It is not clear whether the project proponent has undertaken the development of
plotted colony as no photographs of the site has been submitted with application.
The license has been granted in the year 2010 and is now renewed up to
08.06.2016. The project proponent is required to give justified reasons for not
starting development of plotted colony. The Director of the company shall submit
an undertaking with the declaration that the development of the plotted colony has
not been started and shall submit latest photograph of the licensed area.
In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the
advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the
Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed
in the notification.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for the construction of Affordable group
housing colony At Sector 111, Village Chauma, Distt. Gurgaon
Haryana by M/s Lotus Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable group housing colony At Sector 111, Village Chauma, Distt. Gurgaon
Haryana on a total plot area of 20613.64 sqm (5.093 Acre). The total built up area shall
be 51168.22 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of GF + 10 Floors. The project
proposal shall comprise of Residential Building, Commercial Building, Community Hall
and Aanganwadi. The maximum height of the building shall be 38.6 meter. The total
water requirement shall be 589 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 372 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 492 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 590 KLD
capacity.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not given the details of management of storm water
during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent has not mentioned the stack height in the paper submitted
for appraisal.
3
[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 226 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 3 KLD of for D.G set cooling @ 400
KVA. The project proponent has proposed to set up 2x400 KVA of D.G set
whereas in the water balance diagram 3 KLD of treated water has been shown for
cooling. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase.
[6] The capacity of OWC and the process involved is not submitted.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days.
Item No.[3]Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of Super Speciality
Hospital & Medical College in Revenue Estate of village-Palvali &
Badshahpur at Faridabad by Mata Amritanandamayi Math.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Construction of Super
Speciality Hospital & Medical College in Revenue Estate of village-Palvali &
Badshahpur at Faridabad on total plot area is 308957.04 sqm. develop in a phase manner
(195074 sqm for Hospital Block). The built up area is 416368.8 sqmt. The Hospital
project shall comprise of 2 Blocks (1 Teaching + 1 Hospital); 2 Basements + LG + UG +
Service + 12 floors. The Hospital complex shall have 2000 beds. The maximum height of
the building shall be 50.4 meter. The total water requirement shall be 3184 KLD. The
fresh water requirement shall be 1415 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1453
KLD, which shall be treated in the STP 1800 KLD and ETP 178 KLD capacity. The total
power requirement shall be 15552 KW DG set 16000 KVA which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 27.67% of project
area (22.31% tree plantation + 4.75% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 27 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 5.15 TPD, 0.60
TPD bio-medical wastes. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by
installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M
x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 3209 ECS.
The recommendation of SEAC and the proposal of project proponent was
discussed in the today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding drinking
4
water requirement during operation phase and construction phase, non involvement of
Forest land, Storm water management during construction and operation phase, green
belt development plan, Air quality, Water quality, Traffic circulation plan, Solid waste
management plan and Bio-medical waste management plan etc. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not clearly discussed the storm water management during
construction phase. The representative of the project proponent present in the meeting
assured to submit the same. It was also found that 800 nos. of labour shall be deployed by
the project proponent during construction phase and about 72 KLD of waste water shall
be generated. The project proponent is required to provide STP of adequate capacity for
treatment of waste water in the labour camp area. It was noticed that the project
proponent has not earmarked the space for collection and treatment of bio-degradable
waste on the plan. It was noticed that the project proponent has signed MOU with bio-
medical waste services providing agency authorized by HSPCB. The representative of the
project proponent was asked to set up independent facility for treatment of bio-medical
waste in accordance with the MoEF & CC, GoI Notification dated 28 March 2016
prescribing Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules 2016. The project
proponent shall adopt the Plasma Pyrolysis or Gasification Technology for combustion of
bio-medical waste and shall not use incinerator for combustion of bio-medical waste.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the condition as recommended by SEAC and additional condition as given below and
subject to submission of the following information.
[1] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
(i) They will use treated water from nearby STP for construction purpose.
(ii) They will set up STP of 80 KLD/adequate capacity for treatment of waste
water in the labour camp area.
(iii) They will provide garland drainage system along with sedimentation tank
during its construction phase to regulate storm water during monsoon.
(iv) They will manage its bio-medical waste generated during operational phase
as per the Bio-Medical Waste Management and Handling Rules March
2016.
(v) They will set up organic waste converter for treatment of bio-degradable
waste.
[2] The project proponent shall earmark the space for treatment of bio-degradable
waste on the plan.
[3] The project proponent shall set up independent facility for treatment of bio-
medical waste in accordance with the MoEF & CC, GoI Notification dated 28
March 2016. The project proponent shall adopt the Plasma Pyrolysis or
5
Gasification Technology for combustion of bio-medical waste and shall not use
incinerator for combustion of bio-medical waste.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Building and Construction Project at
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Manesar by M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project
proposal from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006. Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per
guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF & CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No.[5]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
Colony “Happy Homes” located in the revenue estate of Village Budena,
Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Auric Homes Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 90th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016
and the case was deferred for want of more information as under:
[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of authenticated document establishing
that the construction activity was undertaken after the expiry of 45 days of
recommendation of SEAC.
[2] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of
empty cement bag for making of road.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 02.05.2015 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given detail of
process involved for use of empty cement bags for road making. It was noticed that the
process involved shredding of cement bag which will create air pollution and the project
proponent shall adopt APCM to control the same. The project proponent also submitted
copy of temporary power connection bill receipt dated 30.09.2015 which shows the
construction was started by the project proponent after the expiry of 45 days from the
recommendation of SEAC for environment clearance (03.03.2015).
In view of the above discussions the Authority agreed that the project proposal
qualifies for deemed clearance as per sub para (iii) of para 8 of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 and decided to accept the request of project proponent of deemed clearance of
their project subject to strict compliance of the conditions as impose by SEAC in their
recommendation dated 03.03.2015.
6
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
located at Sector-2, Sohna, Haryana by M/s Metro Techno Build Pvt.
Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 90th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016
and the case was defer to the next meeting with the decision that the project proponent
shall submit the following information within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for
preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The project proponent shall give the details of area required for storage of STP
sludge.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 02.05.2015 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given details of
provision made for preservation of top soil, calculation of drinking water for labour and
detail of area required for storage STP sludge.
In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony
Project located at Village Dhunela, Sector-34, Sohna, District-
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s CHD Develpers Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 90th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016
and the case was defer to the next meeting with the decision that the project proponent
shall submit the following information within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for
preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use drip irrigation for horticulture and
landscaping and has proposed to use 6 lit/sqm of treated water. The project
7
proponent is required to justify the use of 6 lit/sqm of treated water with
authenticated proof.
[4] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of
empty cement bag for making of road.
[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking on the non-judicial stamp paper
declaring that:
(i) They will not discharge treated/untreated waste water in the nallah passing
through the project area.
(ii) The natural flow of nallah shall not be obstructed.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 02.05.2015 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given details of
provision made for preservation of top soil, calculation of drinking water for labour,
calculation of requirement of water for landscaping; an undertaking not to discharge any
waste water in the nallah and not to obstruct the natural flow nallah. It was observed that
the project proponent has given detail of process involved for use of empty cement bags
for road making. It was noticed that the process involved shredding of cement bag which
will create air pollution and the project proponent shall adopt APCM to control the same.
In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice and an additional condition as under:
[1] The project proponent shall adopt APCM to control the emissions during
shredding process of empty cement bags.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
“MICASA” at Sector 68 (HD), Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Pareena Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 90th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016
and the case was defer to the next meeting with the decision that the project proponent
shall submit the following information within 15 days.
[1] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of treated water for DG set
cooling of 3000 KVA capacity (power backup only). The project proponent is
required to explain the same with proper justification and calculation.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 05.05.2015 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has now rectified
8
the quantum of use of treated water for cooling purpose and has submitted revised water
balance diagram. The information submitted by the project proponent was found
complete
In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice.
****
1
Minutes of the 92nd
meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 15th
& 16th
June 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS
(Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana,
Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification
dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 428-430 dated 13.06.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
On 15th
June 2016
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable group housing
colony At Sector 111, Village Chauma, Distt. Gurgaon Haryana by M/s
Lotus Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 91st meeting of SEIAA held on 06.05.2016
and the case was deferred for want of more information as under:
[1] The project proponent has not given the details of management of storm water
during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent has not mentioned the stack height in the paper submitted
for appraisal.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 226 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 3 KLD of for D.G set cooling @ 400
KVA. The project proponent has proposed to set up 2x400 KVA of D.G set
whereas in the water balance diagram 3 KLD of treated water has been shown for
cooling. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase.
[6] The capacity of OWC and the process involved is not submitted.
In the today’s meeting the reply dated 20.05.2016 submitted by the project
proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given detail of
storm water management during construction phase; impact of movement of vehicles
carrying treated water on the AAQ and its mitigation measures; capacity of OWC for
treatment of bio-degradable waste; calculation of drinking water, its source, waste water
generation and its treatment in the labour camp area during construction and use of 3
KLD of treated water for DG set cooling but fail to show the location of cooling tower in
2
the project area. It was decided that the project proponent should earmark the location of
cooling tower in the plan. It was also decided that the project proponent may be advised
to adopt Air Cooling device i.e. Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission plan showing location of cooling
tower. The project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.
Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of “IT OFFICE COMPLEX”
Project at 12/6, Village Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad, Haryana (Khasra No.
26//18/2/2/1, 18/2/2/2, 19/1, 19/2, 22/1, 23/1/1, 23/1/2) by M/s SFG
Exports (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has referred the matter to the SEIAA for taking up the case with
MoEF, GoI as Hon’ble NGT has quashed the operation of OM dated 12.12.2012 and
27.06.2013 and no policy/advice has been received from MoEF, GoI to deal with the
violation cases. It was also noticed that the project proposal is for construction of IT
office complex and MOEF & CC, GOI vide draft notification dated 29.04.2016 has
proposed to exempt construction of IT Park subject to the compliance of sustainable
environment management and environmental conditions as stated in appendix-XIII of the
draft notification. The final notification is yet to come.
It was informed that this office has already requested MoEF &CC, GoI to send
necessary guidelines to deal with the violation cases but till date no information has been
received. Accordingly, it was decided to keep the case in abeyance till some information
regarding exemption or to deal with the violation cases is finalized by MOEF & CC,
GOI.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony (13.168 acres) in
the revenue estate of village Nakhdola, Sector -81, Gurgaon , Haryana
by M/S Emaar MGF Land Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing colony (13.168 acres) in the revenue estate of village Nakhdola, Sector -81,
Gurgaon , Haryana on a total plot area of 53289 sqm The total built up area shall be
201940.802 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 5 Residential Towers + GF +
29 Floors. The project proposal shall comprise of Community Building, Convenient
Shopping and Nursery School. The project proposal shall comprise of 740 no. of DU.
The maximum height of the building shall be 95.2 meter. The total water requirement
shall be 638 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 373 KLD. The waste water
generation shall be 427 KLD, which will be treated in the 2 STPS of 450 KLD & 85
KLD capacities.
3
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc.
It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not discussed the details of management of storm
water/rain water harvesting during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent has proposed to use 30 KLD of treated water for cooling of
8 no. of DG sets. The project proponent should give the justification the same with
calculation and also show the location of cooling tower. It was also decided that
the project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.
Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water.
[3] The height of the building is 95.2 meter and the project proponent is required to
furnish the structural stability certificate.
[4] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
[5] The project proponent has not submitted the photograph of the site showing status
of construction accordingly it was decided that a team comprising of Sh. Hitender
Singh, Member SEAC and Sh. S.K.Mishra, Member SEAC shall inspect the site
and submit the report directly to the Authority regarding status of construction if
any within 30 days.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC and Sh.
S.K.Mishra, Member SEAC may be requested to inspect the site and submit the report
directly to the Authority regarding status of construction if any within 30 days period.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Plotted
Colony” project located at Village Naurangpur, Sector-78 & 79,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Revital Reality Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Residential Plotted
Colony” project located at Village Naurangpur, Sector-78 & 79, Gurgaon, Haryana on
total plot area is 415612.154 sqm (102.70 Acre). The built up area shall be 627280.793
sqmt. The proposed project shall have Residential Apartments, EWS Apartments,
Commercial Area, Nursing Homes, Nursery School, Primary School, Clinic and Beauty
Parlor. The Plotted area shall have 793 no. of Plots (435 Residential Plots + 159 EWS
Plots + 199 NPNL units). The total water requirement shall be 1958 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 1100 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1437 KLD
4
which will be treated in the STP of 1925 KLD capacity. The total power requirement
shall be 11500 KVA 2 DG sets of 630 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The
Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 24.33% of project area
(19438.68 sqm tree plantation + 57510.631 avenue plantation + 20126.62 sqm lawn
area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 46 rain water harvesting pits. The
solid waste generation will be 9250 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in
the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed
are 663 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, HT line, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the Stack Height.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 303 KLD of treated water for
horticulture. The project proponent should adopt sprinklers for watering purposes
and accordingly justify the use of 303 KLD of treated water and also submit
revised water balance diagram.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to supply 434 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
[5] In the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan under Stabilization measures the
project proponent has included Temporary Seeding, Permanent Seeding and
Mulching. The project proponent is required to explain in detail with respect to the
proposal under consideration.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the above asked information
within 15 days.
5
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing at Village Harsaru, Sector-88A & 89A, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Alton Buildtech India Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing at Village Harsaru, Sector-88A & 89A, Gurgaon, Haryana on
a total plot area of 20645.01 sqm (5.1015 Acres). The total built up area shall be
53195.15 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 07 Towers consisting of Basement
Tower A1, Tower A2, Tower A3, Tower A4 (S+12 floors), Tower B1 & B2 (GF + 14
Floors), Commercial (GF+3 floors). The proposed project shall have Community Hall,
Aanganwadi cum Creche and 1790 Dwelling Units. The total Dwelling units shall be
804. The maximum height of the building shall be 44.7 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 613 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 388 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 519 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 680 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3080.8 KW which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4399.77 sqm
(21.31%) of project area (1206 sqm tree plantation + 676 sqm avenue plantation +
2517.77 sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 6 rain water
harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2023 kg/day. The bio-degradable
waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste
converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 838 ECS for two wheelers and 336
ECS for four wheelers.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding existence of gas pipe line, water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc.
The Authority observed that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit detail break up of use of 25 KLD of water
during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building.
[4] The project proponent has proposed the development in 3 pockets therefore the
project proponent shall justify the power supply in all the 3 pockets.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STPs in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
6
[6] The project proponent has proposed to supply 260 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
[7] The project proponent is required to submit the exact quantum of spent oil
generation as different figures have been given on page no. 41 & 42 of the
document.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the condition as usual subject to the submission of satisfactory information as asked
above within 15 days.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Cum
Commercial Complex” at Sector-79, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s
Robust Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Residential Cum Commercial Complex” at Sector-79, Faridabad, Haryana on a total plot
area of 43133.351 sqm (10.65 Acre). The total built up area shall be 95202.63 sqm. The
proposed Project shall comprise of 3 Towers + 2 Basements + GF + 18 Floors. The
proposed project shall have Shops, Offices and Dwelling Units. The maximum height of
the building shall be 65.4 meter. The total water requirement shall be 393 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 134 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 273 KLD,
which will be treated in the STP of 320 KLD capacity.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The licenses submitted by the project proponent are not valid.
[2] The project proponent shall justify the use of 4 KLD of water for Tyre washing.
[3] The project proponent shall submit detailed break up of 20 KLD of water
proposed to be used during construction phase.
[4] The project proponent shall submit the water balance diagram during monsoon
period.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 6 litre/sqmt of treated water for
irrigation/horticulture purposes. The project proponent shall give the proper
justification.
[6] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
7
In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the
advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the
Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed
in the notification.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Colony project
“The Melia” located at Village Mohammadpur Gujjar, Sector-35,
Sohna Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DSS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony project “The Melia” located at Village Mohammadpur Gujjar, Sector-
35, Sohna Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 70455.77 sqm (17.41 Acre). The
total built up area shall be 152000 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 11
Residential Towers (Stilt + 14 floors), EWS Tower (Stilt + 13 floors). The proposed
project shall have Community Building, Shopping, Primary School, Nursery School, 917
Main Units, 169 EWS Units and 94 Service Units. The maximum height of the building
shall be 44.9 meter. The total water requirement shall be 863 KLD. The fresh water
requirement shall be 512 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 643 KLD, which will
be treated in the STP of 800 KLD capacity.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent on 31.05.2015 uploaded online application with MOEF &
CC, GOI. The EAC of MOEF & CC, GOI on 19.07.2015 approved the TOR for
preparation of EIA/EMP whereas the project proponent collected the data during
March 2015 to May 2015 i.e. prior to approval of TOR and even submission of
application. The study carried out before submission of application by the project
proponent is not in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the notification.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction
phase with detailed break up.
[4] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to supply 228 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
8
[7] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for DG set Cooling but
the location of cooling tower has not been shown. The project proponent is
required of show the cooling tower on the plan. The project proponent is advised
to adopt Air Cooling Technology i.e. Radiator/ cooling coil in order to save the
water.
In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the
advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the
Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed
in the notification.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony at
Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s JMK
Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony at Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana on a total plot area of 36421.65sqm (9.0 Acre). The total built up area shall be
94066.92 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 13 Towers (GF + 13 floors). The
proposed project shall have retail area, Community Hall and Anganwadi. The maximum
height of the building shall be 46.85 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1090
KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 682 KLD. The waste water generation shall
be 894 KLD, which will be treated in the 3 STPs of 1072 KLD (1061 KLD + 11 KLD)
capacity.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has mentioned the depth of ground water table at 4 meter.
The project proponent is required to submit authenticated proof of some
government agency/CGWB.
[2] No environmental safe guards have been suggested in recommendations for the
safety / protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of
ground water table at 4 meter.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
[4] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction
phase with detailed break up.
[5] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase.
[6] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building.
9
[7] The project proponent has proposed to supply 401 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
[8] The project proponent shall earmark the space reserved for setting up of OWC for
treatment of Bio-degradable waste in the project area.
[9] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of water for horticulture. The
project proponent is required to justify the same with proper calculations.
In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the
advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the
Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed
in the notification.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony in the revenue estate
of Village-Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon by M/s AMB Infraventures
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony in the revenue estate of Village-Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon
Haryana total plot area is 12848.748 sqm (3.175 Acre). The built up area shall be
40377.076 sqmt. The proposed project shall have one commercial building consisting of
2 Basements + GF + 5 floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 32.9 meter.
The total water requirement shall be 517 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 299
KLD. The waste water generation shall be 272 KLD which will be treated in the STP of
300 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 5370 KW which will be
supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on
25.07% (3216.39 sqm) of project area. The Project Proponent proposed to construct 4
rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2133 kg/day. The bio-
degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology.
The total parking spaces proposed are 489 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, HT line, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
10
The Authority observed that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting
up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 218 KLD of treated water for cooling
purposes. The project proponent is required to justify the same with calculations
and also should show the location of cooling tower on the plan. It was also decided
that the project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.
Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the condition as usual subject to the submission of satisfactory information as asked
above within 15 days.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group
Housing Colony” project at Sector-102, Village Dhankot, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
“Affordable Group Housing Colony” project at Village Dhankot, Gurgaon, Haryana on a
total plot area of 20234.25 sqm (5.0 Acres). The total built up area shall be 53420.4 sqm.
The proposed Project shall comprise of 08 Towers + GF + 12 floors. The proposed
project shall have Commercial, Community Hall and Aanganwadi cum Creche and 761
no. of Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be 38.8 meter. The total
water requirement shall be 564 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 366 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 456 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 550 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 4.6 MVA which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4088.66 sqm
(20.21%) of project area (1411.52 sqm green belt + 312.55 sqm tree plantation + 593.84
sqm avenue plantation + 1770.74 sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to
construct 5 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 1795 kg/day.
The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC
(organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 487 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding gas pipe line, water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
11
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA
for supply of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli
Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
The Authority observed that:
[1] The project proponent has proposed the deployment of 150 number of labourer
and has proposed the generation of 23 kg/day of solid waste. The project
proponent is required to justify the same with proper calculation.
[2] The project proponent has proposed to use 35 KLD of treated water for
horticulture/gardening. The project proponent is required to justify the same with
proper calculation.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 5 KLD of water as miscellaneous use
but failed to submit the details of the same. The project proponent is required to
justify the same.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 4 KLD of water for curing purposes.
The project proponent is required to justify the same.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the
public sewer. The project proponent is required to ensure the existence of public
sewer line, its carrying capacity and assurance of the competent body for
discharge of treated water in public sewer.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the condition as usual subject to the submission of satisfactory information as asked
above within 15 days.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted
Colony measuring 104.54375 acres at Village Riwazpur, Bhupani and
Tikawali, Sector 88 & 89, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Fantabulous
Town Planners Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Residential Plotted Colony measuring 104.54375 acres at Village Riwazpur, Bhupani and
Tikawali, Sector 88 & 89, Faridabad, Haryana total plot area is 406000.87 sqm (100.325
Acre). The built up area shall be 281445.16 sqmt. The proposed project shall have
Residential Plots (General, EWS and NPNL), Nursery & Primary School, Nursing Home,
Commercial Complex, Religious Centre and Community Centre. The maximum height of
the building shall be 13 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1858 KLD. The fresh
water requirement shall be 1049 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1278 KLD
which will be treated in the 3 STPs of 170 KLD, 450 KLD & 1350 KLD capacities. The
project proponent has also proposed to set up ETP of 15 KLD capacity for treatment of
12
waste water proposed to be generated from Nursing Home. The total power requirement
shall be 20827.56 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has
proposed to develop green belt on 30% (113542.65 sqm) of project area. The Project
Proponent proposed to construct 23 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation
will be 6163 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by
adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 433 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, HT line, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA
for supply of water and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
The Authority observed that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the
public sewer. The project proponent is required to ensure the existence of public
sewer line, its carrying capacity and assurance of the competent body for
discharge of treated water in public sewer.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 22 KLD of treated water for cooling
purposes. The project proponent is required to justify the same with calculations
and also should show the location of cooling tower on the plan. It was also decided
that the project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.
Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the condition as usual subject to the submission of satisfactory information as asked
above within 15 days.
Item No.[12] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the
Environmental Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006; for development of Residential Plotted
Colony (281.577 Acre) Namely “Vatika India Next” at Sector- 81, 82,
82A, 83 and 85, Village-Simi, Shikhopur and Sikandarpur, Gurgaon
by M/s Vatika Limited.
The Authority observed that on the receipt of the complaint from Shri Prashant
Jhangra R/O Gurgaon reporting violation of the imposed conditions; a committee was
constituted to visit the site and submit its report to SEIAA for taking further action. The
SEIAA on the basis of the report of committee issued show-cause notice to M/s Vatika
Limited vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2016/128 dated 05.03.2016. M/s Vatika Limited on
13
28.03.2016 submitted the reply. It was decided to grant personal hearing to M/s Vatika
Limited to defend the allegations raised in the complaint.
The authorized representative of M/s Vatika Limited Sh. Aashish Chopra
Advocate appeared before the Authority for hearing to defend the case regarding
violation of imposed conditions of the environment clearance letter as pointed out in the
show-cause notice. The representative of the project proponent contended that they have
not violated the conditions of EC letter as reported in the show-cause notice and gave
explanation as under:
1. As regard not obtaining Consent for Establish from HSPCB before the start of
construction the representative of the project proponent argued that the Hon’ble
Delhi High Court in a case has passed judgment that Consent for Establish in case
of Residential Project is not required from PCB under Air and Water Act and
assured the Authority to submit the copy of judgment for reference and decision
thereof. He further informed that the Consent for Establish is linked with the
environmental clearance and Consent for Establish is granted only after
submission of environment clearance letter.
2. As regard start of construction before obtaining prior environmental clearance the
representative of the project proponent described in detail the date of submission
of application for environment clearance for the residential plotted colony, date of
submission of revised application due to addition of area, date of recommendation
of SEAC and date of decision conveyed to them by the SEIAA; keeping in view
the provision of EIA Notification contained in para 8 (iii) and (iv). The
representative of the project proponent further asserted that their revised
application for environmental clearance was finally recommended by SEAC in the
54th
meeting held on 23, 24.02.2011 and no decision was conveyed to them by the
SEIAA in 45 days. The representative of the project proponent categorically
contended that their project proposal qualified for deemed clearance in terms of
para 8 (iii) of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 as no decision was conveyed by
the SEIAA to them in 45 days.
3. As regards clearance from the Fire Department the project proponent submitted
copy of NOC dated 28.08.2015 issued by the Fire Department.
4. As regards assurance of power supply the project proponent submitted copy of
assurance dated 23.06.2010 issued by DHBVN.
5. As regards maintenance of green belt at least 43.05% for the entire township
project the representative of the project proponent inform that in the show cause
notice the green area of Group Housing component has been indicated whereas the
condition of maintenance of green belt of 43.05% has been imposed in the
clearance letter for the entire township project. The environmentally cleared
14
project is still under development and will take more time for
completion/operation. The representative of the project proponent argued that the
achievement of 43.05% of green belt is possible only after the completion of entire
project and assured the Authority to achieve the same during the operational phase
as the condition imposed relates to operational phase.
In view of the above discussions the representative of the project proponent was
asked to submit point wise written statement as discussed during hearing. The
representative of the project proponent agreed to submit the same. It was decided to
examine the written statement and to take up the matter in the meeting of Authority for
taking final decision.
Item No.[13] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the
Environmental Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006; for construction of “ATHARVA” Group
Housing project at sector-109, Village-Panwala, Khusrupur, Gurgaon
by M/s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Authority observed that on the receipt of the complaint from Atharva Owners
Welfare Association reporting violation of the imposed conditions; a committee was
constituted to visit the site and submit its report to SEIAA for taking further action. The
SEIAA on the basis of the report of committee issued show-cause notice to M/s Raheja
Developers Pvt. Ltd vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2016/129 dated 05.03.2016. M/s Raheja
Developers Pvt. Ltd on 26.04.2016 submitted the reply. It was decided to grant personal
hearing to /s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd. to defend the allegations raised in the
complaint. The authorized representative of /s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd. will be heard
in the meeting.
The authorized representative of M/s Raheja Developer Sh. Sajal Gupta appeared
before the Authority for hearing to defend the case regarding violation of imposed
conditions of the environment clearance letter as pointed out in the show-cause notice.
The representative of the project proponent contended that they have not violated the
conditions of EC letter as reported in the show-cause notice and gave explanation as
under:
1. The representative of the project proponent intimated that the environment
clearance was granted for built up area of 157918.34 sqm and the existing built up
area is within the permissible norms as per the clearance letter and the built up
area of 173395.065 sqm shall be achieved after addition of 0.8 acre of additional
licensed area for which application for environmental clearance has been
submitted.
2. As regards maintenance of 30% project area under green cover the representative
of the project proponent clarified that now they have covered 30% of the project
area for which a plan has already been submitted. The representative of the project
15
proponent agreed that earlier the green belt was less than 30% project area but
now they have achieved the same.
3. As regards NOC from the Fire Department the representative of the project
proponent intimated that the issuance of NOC is in advance stage with the
concerned departments and assured to submit the same within week.
Besides discussion of above points of show-cause notice the representative of the
project proponent was asked to clarify about the violation of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 as they have started the construction on additional licensed area of 0.8 acre
without obtaining prior environment clearance. The representative of the project
proponent informed that they have now leveled the area of additional land but kept silent
regarding the issue of starting construction without obtaining prior environment
clearance. The representative further stated that they have already submitted application
for prior environmental clearance for the expansion of the project.
In view of the above discussions the representative of the project proponent was
asked to submit point wise written statement as discussed during hearing. The
representative of the project proponent agreed to submit the same. It was decided to
examine the written statement and to take up the matter in the meeting of Authority for
taking final decision.
Additional Agenda 16th
June 2016
The Chairman granted the permission to take up the following Mining cases as
recommended by SEAC in the meeting as an additional Agenda Items.
Item No.[14]Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand
Minor Mineral, at Kiratpur Block/PKL B-5 & 6 at villages Kiratpur
and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka & District-Panchkula, State Haryana area
13.40 Ha by M/s Barwala Royalty Company.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Barwala
Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Village-
Kiratpur and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka & District-Panchkula, State Haryana over an area of
13.40 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 09.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 13.40 Ha having Village-
Kiratpur and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka & District-Panchkula. The project proponent on
02.02.2016 uploaded online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under
category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was
noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease
16
exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as
category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village-Kiratpur and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka &
District-Panchkula
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral
at Kiratpur Block B5 & 6, 13.40 Ha
603000 TPA @ 67 Trips/day (30 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 72 Lakhs
5. Water Requirement & Source 13 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 5 KLD
Plantation 5.5 KLD
Drinking 2.5 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
7 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 2 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
603000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first.
The Bench mRL will be 490-501 for five years.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Block Latitude Longitude
Kiratpur
30°50'51.9"N 76°51 '02.8"E
30°50'52.3"N 76°53 ’3.1"E
Paploha 30°50'44.7"N 76°53 '41.8"E
30°51'6.2"N 76°54 '2.1"E
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1950 Trees
II Yr. 1950 Tree
III Yr. 1950 Tree
IV Yr. 1950 Tree
V Yr. 1950 Tree
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
17
Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand
Minor Mineral, “Gorakhnath Block B-1 &2” at Village-Gorakhnath,
Tehsil & District-Panchkula, State Haryana area 12.94 Ha by M/s Shri
Nasib Singh.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Shri Nasib
Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, “Gorakhnath Block B-1
&2” at Village-Gorakhnath, Tehsil & District-Panchkula, State Haryana over an area of
12.94 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 09.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 12.94 Ha having
Village-Gorakhnath, Tehsil & District-Panchkula. The project proponent uploaded online
application on 01.02.2016 along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2.
The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The
Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500
meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2.
NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village-Gorakhnath, Tehsil & District-Panchkula
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral
at “Gorakhnath Block B-1 &2”, 12.94 ha.
582300 TPA @65 Trips/day (30 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 75 Lakhs
5. Water Requirement & Source 15 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 3 KLD
Plantation 9 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
7 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 2 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
582300 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first.
The Bench mRL will be 401-392 & 421-419 for
five years.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
Gorakhnath N 30O 53’35.8”
To
N 30O 53’44.2”
E76O 48’40.7”
To
E76O 48’56.3”
18
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1880 Trees
II Yr. 1880 Trees
III Yr. 1880 Trees
IV Yr. 1880 Trees
V Yr. 1880 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[16]Environmental Clearance for proposed River Bed Minor Mineral
Mining project “Mandlai 1 Block/PKL B 21” Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-
Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana area 13.20 Ha by M/s Shri
Ranbir Singh S/O Sh. Mohinder Singh,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Shri Ranbir
Singh S/O Sh. Mohinder Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral,
“Mandlai 1 Block/PKL B 21” at Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-
Panchkula, Haryana over an area of 13.20 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 09.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 13.20 Ha having
Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana. The project
proponent uploaded online application on 18.02.2016 along with copy of approved
Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for
5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no
other mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC
appraised this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-
Panchkula, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral
“Mandlai 1 Block/PKL B 21” 13.20 ha.
5,94,000 TPA @66 Trips/day (30 Ton/Trip)
19
4. Project Cost 70 Lakhs
5. Water Requirement & Source 13.11 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 5.45 KLD
Plantation 4.40 KLD
Drinking 3.26 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
7 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 2 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
5,94,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or
2 meter above water table which ever comes first.
The Bench mRL will be 347-352 for five years.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
Sangrel
Nadi
N 30O 34’05.9”
To
N 30O 34’26.8”
E77O 06’27.4”
To
E77O 06’27.9”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1920 Trees
II Yr. 1920 Trees
III Yr. 1920 Trees
IV Yr. 1920 Trees
V Yr. 1920 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[17]Environmental Clearance for “Bir Tapu YNR B-07 Sand Mine (Minor
Mineral)” at Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna Nagar,
Haryana of area 14.45 Ha by M/s Routes & Journeys through Sh.
Sanjay Kumar.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Routes
& Journeys through Sh. Sanjay Kumar for Mining of Sand Mine (Minor Mineral)” at
Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, over an area of 14.45
Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
20
(LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 14.45 Ha having
Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent
uploaded online application on 17.03.2016 along with copy of approved Mining Plan
under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It
was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine
lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this
project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral
“Bir Tapu YNR B-07 ” 14.45 Ha.
6, 15, 000 TPA @82 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 19 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 15.0 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 10 KLD
Plantation 3.0 KLD
Drinking 2.0 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
64 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 33 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
6, 15, 000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or
2 meter above water table which ever comes first.
The alivation range will be 269 amsl to 270 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Co-ordinates Latitudes Longitudes
Lease area N 30O 06’46”
To
N 30O 06’56”
E77O 23’40”
To
E77O 24’06”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 400 Trees
II Yr. 400 Trees
III Yr. 400 Trees
IV Yr. 400 Trees
V Yr. 400 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
21
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[18]Environmental Clearance for “Extraction of Dolomite and Beryte,
along with associated minor mineral (Road Metal & Masonry)” at
Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District, Mahendergarh, Haryana
of area 4.80 Ha by M/s Xandy Mines & Minerals,
The SEAC has recommended the case for Environment Clearance to M/s Xandy
Mines & Minerals for “Extraction of Dolomite and Beryte, along with associated minor
mineral (Road Metal & Masonry)” at Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District,
Mahendergarh, Haryana of area 4.80 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed that the mine lease area is less than 5 Ha and as such the
environmental clearance in this case is to be granted by DEIAA/DEAC in view of
amendment to the Notification dated 15.01.2016. It was found that MoEF & CC, GoI vide
letter no. Z-11013/8/2016-IA.II (M) dated 15.03.2016 has clarified that where SEAC has
recommended the cases for environmental clearance such cases are to be processed at the
level of SEIAA for grant of environmental clearance. Accordingly it was decided to take
up the case as recommended by SEAC. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology
Department has granted lease for a period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions
as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 28.08.2014. The lease has been granted for an
area of 4.80 Ha having Khasra no. 103, 108 & 109 Village-Dhonkhera. The project
proponent on 30.03.2016 submitted online application along with copy of approved
Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for
5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other
mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised
this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2
2. Location of Project Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District,
Mahendergarh, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Extraction of Dolomite and Beryte, along with
associated minor mineral (Road Metal & Masonry)”
at Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District,
Mahendergarh, Haryana Khasra no. 103, 108 & 109
over an area of 4.80 Ha
Dolomite & Beryte: 1,25,000 MT
R.M. & M.S: 2,00,000 MT
Total: 3,25,000 TPA
4. Project Cost 19 Crores
22
5. Water Requirement & Source 4 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 2 KLD
Plantation 1 KLD
Drinking 1 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
7.6 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 15 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 364 to 358 3,21,650 MT
Second 364 to 352 3,25,250 MT
Third 370 to 352 3,25,500 MT
Fourth 370 to 352 3,25,100 MT
Fifth 352 to 346 3,25,100 MT
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 200 Trees
II Yr. 200 Trees
III Yr. 200 Trees
IV Yr. 200 Trees
V Yr. 200 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van, Water
sprinkler, Rear dumpers.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the usual conditions as recommended by SEAC.
Item No.[19]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Balu/Sand over an area of
35.00 Ha' in Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production Capacity- I 2,67
,200 Tons per Tehsil- Ganaur, District Sonipat (HR) by M/s Ultimate
Group.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
Ultimate Group for Mining of Balu/Sand, at Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production
Capacity- I 2, 67, 200 Tons per year Tehsil- Ganaur, District Sonipat (HR) over an area
of 35.00 Ha' by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent submitted online application with
MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI in its 35th
meeting held on 24 to 26 June 2015 approved the TOR subject to submission of revised
Form-I, PFR and details of the court cases. The project proponent on 30.07.2015
submitted the desired information accordingly the MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter dated
19.08.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project proponent.
Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 18.04.2016 in view of the amendment to
23
the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted EIA/EMP on
20.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for
a period of 08 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 21.04.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 35.00 Ha (23.60 Ha in
Gyaspur/Rasulpur, River Bed Block +11.40 Ha in Gyaspur outside River Bed Block)
Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production Capacity- I 2,67 ,200 Tons per Tehsil- Ganaur,
District Sonipat (HR). The land use of 11.40 Ha in Gyaspur outside riverbed is
agriculture land as per sustainable sand mining management guidelines issued by MoEF,
GoI the lease should be of sand mining from agriculture field or river. In same lease both
type of area should not be included where as in the space the Mines and Geology
Department Haryana has granted lease for 35 Ha to the project proponent vide LOI dated
20.04.2016. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan dated
22.07.2015. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 16.03.2016. The SEAC has
appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production Capacity-
I2,67 ,200 Tons per Tehsil- Ganaur, District
Sonipat (HR)
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Balu/Sand, at Village- Gyaspur-
Rasulpur' 35.00 Ha.
12,67,200 MT/year @142 Trips/day (169
Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 8.50 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 22 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 13 KLD
Plantation 7 KLD
Drinking 2KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
21.10 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh per anum
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 12,
67,200 MT/year. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl
or 2 meter above water table which ever comes first
in the riverbed mining.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
River bed N 29O 05’50”
To
N 29O 06’27”
E77O 07’50”
To
E77O 08’14”
Outside
River bed
N 29O 05’59”
To
N 29O 06’11”
E77O 06’43”
To
E77O 06’56”
24
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[20]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Bailgarh South Block/YNR B2” over
an area of 28.00 Ha. Falling in Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Mubarikpur Royalty
Company.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
Mubarikpur Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals)
Mines namely “Bailgarh South Block/YNR B2” Falling in Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-
Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 28.00 Ha by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 10.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 28.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 25.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 09 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 28.00
Ha “Bailgarh South Block/YNR B2 at Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan
dated 23.02.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 09.03.2016. The
25
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor
Minerals) Mines namely “Bailgarh South
Block/YNR B2” over an area of 28.00 Ha.
13,00,000 TPA @173 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 8.50 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 43 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 25 KLD
Plantation 15 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
34 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
13,00,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or
2 meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Co-ordinator Latitudes Longitudes
Lease area N 30O 13’29.01”
N 30O 13’10.29”
N 30O 12’41.01”
E77O 30’34.59”
E77O 30’24.22”
E77O 30’17.97”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
26
Item No.[21]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22”
over an area of 13.59 Ha. Falling in Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-
Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Delhi Royalty
Company.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Delhi
Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines
namely “Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22” falling in Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-
Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 13.59 Ha. by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 13.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 27.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 11.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 08 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 13.59
Ha “Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22” at Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining
plan dated 23.02.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 11.03.2016. The
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained. It was noticed that the lease area is less than 25 Ha. The EAC of MoEF & CC,
GoI and SEAC have appraised this project under category B-1 requiring approval of TOR,
Public Consultation as per procedure prevalent at that time. The MoEF &CC, GoI on
15.01.2016 amended the Notification and as per amended Notification this project activity
now falls under caterogy B-2.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22”
over an area of 13.59 Ha
2,50,000 TPA @33 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 7 Crore
27
5. Water Requirement & Source 25 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 14 KLD
Plantation 10 KLD
Drinking 1 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
24 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
2,50,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
Kohliwala
Block/YNR
B-21
N 30O 15’34.8”
N 30O 15’42.1”
N 30O 15’38.2”
N 30O 15’34.6”
E77O 30’08.1”
E77O 30’17.0”
E77O 30’19.8”
E77O 30’13.0”
Kohliwala
Block/YNR
B-22
N 30O 15’32.0”
N 30O 15’26.3”
N 30O 15’18.2”
N 30O 15’26.5”
E77O 30’25.4”
E77O 30’30.3”
E77O 30’37.0”
E77O 30’25.3”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 400 Trees
II Yr. 400 Trees
III Yr. 400 Trees
IV Yr. 400 Trees
V Yr. 400 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project as category B-
2 in view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 by imposing the additional
condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[22]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20” over
an area of 9.95 Ha. Falling in Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-
Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Ganga
Yamuna Mining Co.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Ganga
Yamuna Mining Co. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines
namely “Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20” falling in Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-
28
Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 9.95 Ha by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 10.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 25.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 12.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 9.95 Ha
“Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20”at Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan
dated 23.12.2015. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 11.03.2016. The
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained. It was noticed that the lease area is less than 25 Ha. The EAC of MoEF & CC,
GoI and SEAC have appraised this project under category B-1 requiring approval of TOR,
Public Consultation as per procedure prevalent at that time. The MoEF &CC, GoI on
15.01.2016 amended the Notification and as per amended Notification this project activity
now falls under caterogy B-2.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20”
over an area of 9.95 Ha
2,00,000 TPA @27 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 3.5 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 20 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 14 KLD
Plantation 10 KLD
Drinking 1 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
24 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 15 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
2,00,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first.
29
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Co-ordinates Latitudes Longitudes
of the lease
area
N 30O 14’50”
To
N 30O 15’06”
E77O 28’38.5”
To
E77O 28’51”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 400 Trees
II Yr. 400 Trees
III Yr. 400 Trees
IV Yr. 400 Trees
V Yr. 400 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project as category B-
2 in view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 by imposing the additional
condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[23]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Devdhar Block/YNR B-24” over an
area of 31.87 Ha. Falling in Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Northern Royalty Company,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Northern
Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines
namely “Devdhar Block/YNR B-24” falling in Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 31.87 Ha by imposing stipulations
stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 11.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 25.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 12.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 08 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
30
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 31.87
Ha “Devdhar Block/YNR B-24” at Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan
dated 01.01.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 10.03.2016. The
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Devdhar Block/YNR B-24”
over an area of 31.87 Ha
5,10,000 TPA @77 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 8 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 42 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 28 KLD
Plantation 12 KLD
Drinking 2 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
29 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 15 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
5,10,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Co-ordinates Latitudes Longitudes
of the lease
area
N 30O 15’03.0”
N 30O 15’02.7”
N 30O 14’49.6”
N 30O 14’49.9”
E77O 28’06.0”
E77O 28’31.3”
E77O 28’25.2”
E77O 28’57.7”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 480 Trees
II Yr. 480 Trees
III Yr. 480 Trees
IV Yr. 480 Trees
V Yr. 480 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
31
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[24]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Pobari Block/YNR B-11” over an area
of 23.05 Ha. Falling in Village-Pobari, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana by M/s Devlopment Strategies India Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s
Devlopment Strategies India Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor
Minerals) Mines namely “Pobari Block/YNR B-11” falling in Village-Pobari, Tehsil-
Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 23.05 Ha by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 13.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 25.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 03.12.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 13.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 09 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 23.05
Ha “Pobari Block/YNR B-11” at Village-Pobari, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar,
Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan dated 09.03.2016.
The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 10.03.2016. The SEAC has appraised
this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained. It was
noticed that the lease area is less than 25 Ha. The EAC of MoEF & CC, GoI and SEAC
have appraised this project under category B-1 requiring approval of TOR, Public
Consultation as per procedure prevalent at that time. The MoEF &CC, GoI on 15.01.2016
amended the Notification and as per amended Notification this project activity now falls
under caterogy B-2.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Pobari, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Pobari Block/YNR B-11”
over an area of 23.05 Ha
11,00,000 TPA @147 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 5.50 Crore
32
5. Water Requirement & Source 48 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 20 KLD
Plantation 7 KLD
Drinking 21 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
34 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 21.25 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
11,00,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or
2 meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
Pobari
Block/YNR
B-11
N 30O 0’12.942”
N 30O 0’4.75”
N 30O 0’16.79”
N 30O 0’22.25”
E77O 15’44.055”
E77O 16’4.75”
E77O 16’13.82”
E77O 15’54.19”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 600 Trees
II Yr. 600 Trees
III Yr. 600 Trees
IV Yr. 600 Trees
V Yr. 600 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project as category B-
2 in view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 by imposing the additional
condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[25]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Mandewala Block/YNR B-38” over an
area of 15.00 Ha. Falling in Village-Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Saharanpur Mines
Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s
Saharanpur Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and
Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Mandewala Block/YNR B-38” falling in Village-
Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 15.00
Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
33
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 07.08.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 27.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 14.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 08 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 15.00
Ha “Mandewala Block/YNR B-38” at Village-Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan
dated 10.03.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 10.03.2016. The
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained. It was noticed that the lease area is less than 25 Ha. The EAC of MoEF & CC,
GoI and SEAC have appraised this project under category B-1 requiring approval of TOR,
Public Consultation as per procedure prevalent at that time. The MoEF &CC, GoI on
15.01.2016 amended the Notification and as per amended Notification this project activity
now falls under caterogy B-2.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Mandewala Block/YNR B-38”
over an area of 15.00 Ha
2,40,000 TPA @40 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 7 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 26 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 15 KLD
Plantation 10 KLD
Drinking 1 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
26 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 15 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
2,40,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first in
riverbed mining.
34
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
Mandewala, N 30O 15’57.4”
N 30O 15’46.2”
N 30O 15’41.9”
N 30O 15’41.5”
E77O 30’31.7”
E77O 30’32.1”
E77O 30’25.9”
E77O 30’38.4”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 400 Trees
II Yr. 400 Trees
III Yr. 400 Trees
IV Yr. 400 Trees
V Yr. 400 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project as category B-
2 in view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 by imposing the additional
condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16”
over an area of 44.62 Ha. Falling in Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Radaur,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Jogender Singh S/o Sh.
Mahinder Singh,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Jogender
Singh S/o Sh. Mahinder Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals)
Mines namely “Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16” falling in Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-
Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 44.62 Ha by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 13.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 27.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 15.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
35
granted lease for a period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 44.62
Ha “Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16” at Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Radaur, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan
dated 15.02.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 04.04.2016. The
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16”
over an area of 44.62 Ha
21,00,000 TPA @280 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 9 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 96 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 40 KLD
Plantation 16 KLD
Drinking 40 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
34 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 30 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
21,00,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or
2 meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Corners Latitudes Longitudes
Gumthala
North
Block/YNR
B-16
N 29O 57’22.187”
N 29O 56’46.1”
N 29O 57’35.106”
N 29O 56’49.929”
E77O 12’43.538”
E77O 12’42.2”
E77O 13’8.801”
E77O 12’56.757”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
36
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter
Item No.[27]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36” over an
area of 29.60 Ha. Falling in Village-Nandgarh, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli,
District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Apar Mines Management
Services Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Apar
Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor
Minerals) Mines namely “Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36” falling in Village-Nandgarh,
Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 29.60 Ha. by
imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 30.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 25.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 10.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 16.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 08 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 20.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 29.60
Ha “Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36” at Village-Nandgarh, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan
dated 16.04.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 04.04.2016. The
SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Nandgarh, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36”
over an area of 29.60 Ha
5,77,000 TPA @77 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 11 Crore
37
5. Water Requirement & Source 27 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 14.50 KLD
Plantation 11 KLD
Drinking 1.50 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
29 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
5,77,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2
meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Co-
ordinates
Latitudes Longitudes
of the lease N 30O 12’59”
N 30O 12’47”
N 30O 12’29”
N 30O 12’45”
E77O 25’16”
E77O 25’28”
E77O 25’8.5”
E77O 24’59”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter
Item No.[28]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand
(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Lapra Block/YNR B-10” over an area
of 34.28 Ha. Falling in Village-Lapra, Tehsil- Jagadhari, District
Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Apar Mines Management Services
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Apar
Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor
Minerals) Mines namely “Lapra Block/YNR B-10” falling in Village-Lapra, Tehsil-
Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 34.28 Ha by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
38
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 30.07.2015 submitted online
application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI
in its meeting held on 26.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter
dated 10.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project
proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the
amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted
EIA/EMP on 16.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has
granted lease for a period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in
Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 20.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 34.28
Ha “Lapra Block/YNR B-10” at Village-Lapra, Tehsil- Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar,
Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan dated 09.03.2016.
The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 05.04.2016. The SEAC has appraised
this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village-Lapra, Tehsil- Jagadhari, District Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
“Lapra Block/YNR B-10”
over an area of 34.28 Ha
15,30,000 TPA @204 Trips/day (25 MT)
4. Project Cost 15.50 Crore
5. Water Requirement & Source 56 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 20 KLD
Plantation 7 KLD
Drinking 29 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
29 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
15,30,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or
2 meter above water table which ever comes first.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area
Co-
ordinates
Latitudes Longitudes
of the lease N 30O 05’28”
N 30O 05’18”
N 30O 05’12”
N 30O 05’12”
E77O 22’02”
E77O 22’30”
E77O 22’22”
E77O 21’53”
39
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:
[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining
Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall
ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the
sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the
environment clearance letter.
*******
1
Minutes of the 93rd meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 22nd July 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 571-573 dated 18.07.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
measuring 13.2118 Acres at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, Dpistrict
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd & Others.
This case was lastly considered in the 90th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016
and was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following observations.
[i] The proposed built up area of the project 149449.28 sqm. The SEAC is required
to calculate the built up area as clarified in the MoEF OM F. No, 19-127/2011-
IA-III dated 02.04.2012 and thereafter re-appraise the project proposal as per
procedure prescribed in the Notification if the proposed built up area found to be
15,0000 sqm or above.
[ii] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[iii] The project proponent has proposed to supply 230 KLD to water tankers for
construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 04.05.2016 submitted the reply to the
observations the SEAC in its 134th meeting again appraised the project in the light of
observations raised by SEIAA and recommended this project for Environment Clearance.
The recommendations of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting it
was noticed that the total proposed built up area of the project is 149585.26 sqm against
earlier proposed area of 149449.28 sqm. It was observed that the project proponent has
reduced the proposed built up area of basements from 50214 sqm to 38187 sqm and
accordingly also submitted revised Form-I. As per revised proposal the project proponent
has proposed to develop 2 ½ basements instead of earlier proposal of 3 basements. It was
felt by the Authority the proposal to develop 2 ½ basements seems practically not viable
for the structural stability and safety of the building. It was decided that the project
proponent may be asked to justify the same with authenticated records/proof. It was
noticed that the project proponent has proposed to deploy 130 numbers of labour to
2
achieve built up area of 149585.26 sqm which was found not justified. The project
proponent is required to give the exact number of labourers to be deployed permanently
during construction phase and impact of construction activity on the health of the
labourers and the remedial measures to be undertaken. The project proponent is also
required to explain the calculation of 24 KLD of treated water proposed to be use for dust
suppression.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the following
within 15 days.
1. The project proponent has proposed to develop 2 ½ basements instead of earlier
proposal of 3 basements. The project proponent is required to justify the same with
authenticated records/proof taking into consideration the structural stability and
safety of the proposed building.
2. The project proponent is required to give the exact number of labourers to be
deployed permanently during construction phase and impact of construction
activity on the health of the labourers and the remedial measures to be undertaken.
3. The project proponent is also required to explain the calculation of 24 KLD of
treated water proposed to be use for dust suppression.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance “Expansion of Model Economic Township” at
Jhajjar, Haryana by M/s Model Economic Township Ltd (formerly
known as M/s Reliance Haryana SEZ Ltd).
The SEAC has recommended for withdrawal of application as has been requested
by the project proponent. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration
in the today’s meeting. It was observed that the Project Proponent on 26.11.2014
submitted application for the “Expansion of Model Economic Township” on the
additional land 92.26 hact. for the development of housing component. The
Environmental Clearance to the existing project of an area 752.72 hact. was granted by
MoEF GoI under category 7(c).
The project proponent vide letter dated 15.09.2015 requested for withdrawal of
application due to change in planning. The sub-committee constituted by SEAC also
visited the site and reported that no construction activity has been undertaken on the
additional land and recommended for withdrawal of application as per request of project
proponent.
In view of the above the Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and
decided to grant permission for withdrawal of the application as has been requested by
project proponent vide letter dated 15.09.2015.
3
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for “Global Industrial Park” located at
Sector-72 & 73, District Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Vashisth
Builders And Engineers Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 72nd meeting of SEIAA held on 18.07.2014
wherein it was noticed that the project proponent has not submitted the complete
information and decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the advice to asked the
project proponent to submit the below mentioned information; re-examine the same and
send its recommendation within stipulated period.
(i) Revise EIA/EMP on the basis of revised baseline data.
(ii) List of projects to be set up in the Industrial state duly authenticated by
the GMDIC.
(iii) NOC from Forest Department.
(iv) Revise water requirement and water baseline diagram @165 lpcd
instead of @111 lpcd.
(v) Revised service line plan without intercepting Revenue Rasta.
(vi) Revised traffic Circulation plan.
The Project Proponent on 12.04.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of
the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 134th meeting held on 30.05.2016 and
SEAC again has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was
noticed that the project proponent has proposed use of 262 KLD of treated water for
horticulture purposes which was found to be on higher side. The project proponent is
required to submit the revised water calculation for use of treated water for horticulture
and accordingly revised water balance diagram.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the information of the following
within 15 days.
1. The project proponent is required to submit the revised water calculation for use of
treated water for horticulture and accordingly revised water balance diagram.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Warehouse Project in the revenue estate
of Village Pathrari, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sunsat Infotech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent
under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the project proponent has completed the
construction of Warehouse Project without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The
SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and
27.06.2013.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of
4
OM of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter
no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF &
CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view the
quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF &
CC, GOI has been received.
In view of the above the Authority decided to keep this case pending till
clarification is received from MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for w.r.t Expansion of Ware House at Village
Behrampur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s P.D.Enterprises.
The SEAC has recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent
under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the project proponent has completed the
construction of Warehouse Project without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The
SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and
27.06.2013.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of
OM of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter
no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF &
CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view the
quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF &
CC, GOI has been received.
In view of the above the Authority decided to keep this case pending till
clarification is received from MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Group Housing
Colony located at Sector-112-113, Bajghera Road, Distt-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Lemon Tree Land and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Revision & Expansion of
Group Housing Colony located at Sector-112-113, Bajghera Road, Distt-Gurgaon,
Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 85161.03 sqm. (21.04 Acres)
2. Built up area Existing 206029.404 sqm
Expansion 2198.9 sqm
Total (208228.36 sqm)
3. License Valid up 28.08.2016/ 10.12.2017
4. Nos. of Plots 2 plots (each plots has 2 basements)
5. Nos. of DU General 1032, EWS 183 , Service personal
108
6. Height 83.7 Meter (NOC from AAI not in records)
7. Green belt 25.5%
5
8. Water requirement 1105 KLD
9. Fresh Water 590 KLD
10. Waste Water 718 KLD
11. STP Capacity 440 KLD & 548 KLD
12 Power Requirement 9.4 MVA DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 3343 kg/day (OWC proposed for 2005.5
kg/day)
14. ECS 1663 ECS
15. RWH 19 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 25 KLD of treated water for DG
cooling and also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO
unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for DG cooling and
management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be
submitted. .
[4] The project proponent has given different figures of total water requirement in the
document i.e. 1029 KLD and 1282 KLD. The project proponent is required to give
the exact quantum of total water requirement with proper calculation.
[5] It was also decided that Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit report to the SEIAA within 15
days on the following points:
(i) The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the
public sewer. The committee shall report the capacity and location of external
sewer.
(ii) To check the proposal of use of 5 KLD of treated water for water body.
(iii) To check the number and location of drying beds for storage of sludge.
(iv) In the water balance diagram for plot II the figures 308 KLD and 372 KLD not
matching.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 4 within 15 days and Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender
6
Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on
the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (1.7 acres) at
Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Pursarth Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of IT
Park/Unit (1.7 acres) at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana as
under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 4856.22 sqm. (1.20 Acres)
2. Built up area 22673.25 sqm
3. CLU Granted on 01.8.2014 by Urban Local
Bodies Department and Valid for two years
4. Maximum floors 3 Basements + GF + 6 floors
5. Height 37.55 Meter
6. Green belt 25.43%
7. Water requirement 92 KLD
8. Fresh Water 22 KLD
9. Waste Water 61 KLD
10. STP Capacity 75 KLD
11. Power Requirement 1950 KVA, DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 305.70 kg/day (OWC proposed for 137.68
kg/day)
13. ECS 300 ECS
14. RWH 02 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 16.5 KLD of fresh water for DG
cooling and 15+5 KLD of treated water for HVAC make up also show the location
of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment
of water prior to its use for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of
RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The validity of CLU is up to 31.07.2016. The project proponent is required to
submit validated CLU.
7
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (2.34 acres)
at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Pursarth Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of IT
Park/Unit (2.34 acres) at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana as
under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 9874.314 sqm. (2.44 Acres)
2. Built up area 40655.59 sqm
3. CLU Granted on 01.08.2014 by Urban Local
Bodies department and valid up to 2 years
from the date of issuance
4. Maximum floors 3 Basements + GF + 9 floors
5. Height 41.40 Meter
6. Green belt 25.28%
7. Water requirement 173 KLD
8. Fresh Water 56 KLD
9. Waste Water 105 KLD
10. STP Capacity 130 KLD
11. Power Requirement 2530 KVA, DHBVN
11. Solid Waste 530 kg/day (OWC proposed for 238.50
kg/day)
12. ECS 575 ECS
13. RWH 03 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 18 KLD of fresh water for DG
cooling and 22+8 KLD of treated water for HVAC make up also show the location
of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment
of water prior to its use for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of
RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.
8
[4] The validity of CLU is up to 31.07.2016. The project proponent is required to
submit validated CLU.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[9] Extension in environment clearance for the construction of proposed
Group Housing Project at Village-Sihi, Sector-84, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Magnum International Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The project proposal is for the grant of extension of validity of environment
clearance letter. The SEAC in its 135th meeting held on 28.06.2016 decided to refer this
case to SEIAA for further action.
The case was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that
the project proponent on 24.11.2015 submitted application for extension of validity of
Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2010/1153 dated
29.12.2010 under cat 8(a) valid up to 28.12.2015. The case was examined in the light of
amendment to the notification dated 29.04.2015 and clarification dated 12.04.2016 issued
thereafter by MOEF & CC, GOI and found that the validity of Environment Clearance is
up to 28.12.2017.
In view of the above the Authority decided that the project proponent may be
informed that the validity of EC now stand up to 28.12.2017. The project proponent may
apply for extension of validity one month prior to expiry of validity, if required.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance Extension & Expansion of “Residential
Plotted Colony” located at Sector 36-39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s
Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd.
The SEAC has referred this case to SEIAA with the recommendation to seek
clarification from MOEF & CC, GOI whether moratorium has been imposed in this areas
as Panipat town is covered under critically polluted areas as per CEPI score.
The case was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that
the project proponent on 28.10.2014 submitted application for extension and expansion
of residential plotted colony at village Kabri and Faridpur, sector 37-39, Panipat,
Haryana.
It was observed that the MOEF and CC, GOI time and again has imposed
moratorium in different states on the basis of CEPI score. The moratorium has/had been
imposed in specified areas in various districts of states of country. Moratorium was also
imposed in parts of Faridabad and Panipat based on CEPI score declaring the parts of
these two towns as critically polluted areas. Later on the moratorium was lifted vide
MOEF GOI office memorandum 20th may 2016.Therefore clarification from MOEF &
CC, GOI is not required.
9
In view of the above a decision was taken to refer this case back to SEAC with the
advice to appraise this project and send recommendations on merits as per the procedure
prescribed in the Notification.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Expansion of Residential
Plotted Colony “Sonepat Global City” at Sec-33, 34 & 35, Village
Rathdhana, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Jindal Realty Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Expansion of Residential Plotted Colony “Sonepat Global City” at Sec-33, 34 & 35,
Village Rathdhana, Sonepat, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area Existing- 446214.8 sqmt (110.2 acre)
Additional- 422716.74 sqmt (104.518 acre)
Total – 868931.54 sqmt(214.718 acre)
2. Built up area Existing – 233482.80 sqmt
Additional – 285896 sqmt
Total – 519378.80 sqmt
3. License Valid up to 10.06.2019
4. No. of Plots Main Plots-1013
NPNL-461
EWS-369
Total-1843
5. Maximum floors GF + 2 floors
6. Height 15 Meter
7. Green belt 30.58%
8. Water requirement 4200 KLD
9. Fresh Water 2135 KLD
10. Waste Water 2977 KLD
11. STP Capacity 7 no. of STPs -3600 KLD
12. Power Requirement 22120 KW, DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 11544 kg/day (5 no. of OWC proposed for
8081 kg/day)
14. ECS 1240 ECS
15. RWH 115 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
10
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted
Colony at Sector-33, Village Patti Kaisth Seth, Kaithal, Haryana by
M/s Dhir Construction & Builders Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended for granting environmental clearance for
development of Residential Plotted Colony at Sector-33, Village Patti Kaisth Seth,
Kaithal, Haryana. The project proponent has been granted license for development of
Plotted Colony on an area of 101.799 Acres by the Town and Country Planning
Department. The net plot area for the development is 93.44 Acres. The total built up area
has been indicated as 304247.46 sqm and basement area as 5000 sqm. The project
proposal shall comprise of Residential Plots, EWS Plots, Commercial Area, Institutional,
High School, Primary School, Nursery School, Dispensary, Nursing Homes, Creche,
Community Centre, Religious Building, Milk/vegetable booth, Taxi Stand etc. The
maximum height of the building shall be 14 meter. The project proponent has proposed to
develop green belt on 32.57% of plot area. The total water requirement will be 2120
KLD. Fresh water will be 991 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1220 KLD
which will be treated in the STP of 1500 KLD capacity. The treated water will be
recycled and reuse. The solid waste generation will be 11549 kg/day and bio-degradable
waste will be 3379 kg/day and the project proponent has proposed to provide four
number of organic waste converter. The project proponent has proposed to construct 100
RWH pits.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, waste
water generation, Air Quality, treatment of waste water, green belt development plan,
Non involvement of forest land etc. It was observed by the Authority that the project
proponent has not provided proper information in respect of point no. 8 & 9 of Form-1A.
The project proponent is also required to submit revised water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the below
mentioned observations within 15 days period.
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
11
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony in the
Revenue Estate of Village Shikhopur, Sector-82-A, Gurgaon Manesar
Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Burman GSC Estate Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Commercial Colony in the Revenue Estate of Village Shikhopur, Sector-82-A, Gurgaon
Manesar Urban Complex, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 17957.92 sqmt (4.4375 acre)
2. Built up area 61579.235 sqmt
3. License Valid up to 27.06.2016
4. No. of Tower 3 Towers, 239 Service Apartments
5. Maximum floors GF + 19 floors
6. Height 75 Meter
7. Green belt 25.27%
8. Water requirement 399 KLD
9. Fresh Water 211 KLD
10. Waste Water 198.22 KLD
11. STP Capacity 280
11. Power Requirement 3822 KW, DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 870.6 kg/day (1 no. of OWC proposed for
609.42 kg/day)
13. ECS 751 ECS
14 RWH 04 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 34.09 KLD of fresh water and 90.91
KLD of treated water HVAC make up with calculations. Installation of RO unit is
also required for treatment of water prior its use for cooling and also management
of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The project proponent shall submit structural stability certificate issued by
IIT/reputed institute.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to deploy 50 number of labour for carrying of
construction of 62000 sqmt. The project proponent shall submit exact number of
labourers to be deployed, the detailed calculations of drinking water for
12
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to use 15 KLD of fresh water for swimming
pool makeup. The project proponent is required to justify the same.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony projects at Village Sohna, Sector-6, Dist- Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s Arete India Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Colony projects at Village Sohna, Sector-6, Dist- Gurgaon as
under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 24306.39 sqmt (6.00625 acre)
2. Built up area 59100.52 sqmt
3. License Valid up to 01.08.2019
4. No. of Tower 23 Towers, 866 DU, Creche, Commercial
area
6. Height 44.9 Meter
7. Green belt 20.62%
8. Water requirement 676 KLD
9. Fresh Water 405 KLD
10. Waste Water 545 KLD
11. STP Capacity 650 KLD
11. Power Requirement 4500 KW, DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 1732 kg/day (2 no. of OWC proposed for
1385.6 kg/day)
13. ECS 529 ECS
14 RWH 07 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
13
[3] The project proponent has proposed to dispose of 108 KLD of sludge at the
municipal site. The project proponent is required to submit the location of site and
assurance also.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 174 KLD of treated water in the
drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with
location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.
[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 50 KLD of treated water for
landscaping.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical
University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar,
Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Maharaja Agrasen Medical University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar,
Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 33620 sqmt (8.30 acre)
2. Built up area 66005.54 sqmt
3. CLU Granted on 12.08.2014 and valid up to 2
years from the date of issuance
4. Height 29.95 Meter
5. Green belt 35.7%
6. Water requirement 489 KLD
7. Fresh Water 259 KLD
8. Waste Water 287 KLD
9. STP Capacity 785 KLD and 50 KLD of ETP
10. Power Requirement 5948.28 KVA, UHBVN
11. Solid Waste 1532 kg/day
12. ECS 665 ECS
13 RWH 01 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that the project proponent has not given the details
regarding handing and management of bio-medical waste. It was decided that the project
proponent should submit MOU with the authorized vender located in 500 meter radius of
the project area as per the requirement of Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, March
14
2016 or a submit complete plan of bio-medical waste management within the project
area.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Commercial Colony located
in the revenue estate of Village Nangli Umarpur, Dist-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s JMD Limited.
The SEAC has recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent
under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the project proponent has completed the
construction of Commercial Colony Project without obtaining prior environmental
clearance. The SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated
12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of
OM of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter
no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF &
CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view the
quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF &
CC, GOI has been received.
In view of the above the Authority decided to keep this case pending till
clarification is received from MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
“Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group
Housing Colony “Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 59716.33 sqmt (14.756 acre)
2. Built up area 148520.76 sqmt
3. License Valid up to 11.06.2019
4. No of Floors 17 Blocks+ 2 Basements + GF + 13 floors
5. No. of DU 794 DU, Servant rooms 84, EWS Units 41
6. Height 44.85 Meter
7. Green belt 30.20%
8. Water requirement 824 KLD
9. Fresh Water 463 KLD
10. Waste Water 576 KLD
11. STP Capacity 2 STPs of 690 KLD
12. Power Requirement 5902.23 KW, DHBVN
13 Solid Waste 2268 kg/day (2 no. of OWC proposed for
15
1588 kg/day)
14 ECS 1489 ECS
15 RWH 13 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent is required to submit soft copy giving complete break up of
proposed built up area.
[4] The project proponent is required to justify use of 145 KLD of treated water for
landscaping of an area of 16117 sqmt with calculations.
[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 11 KLD for Misc. use.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 174 KLD of treated water in the
drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with
location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Colony Project located at revenue estate of Village Baselwa,
Sec-88, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Amolik Housing Pvt. Ltd.
(Formerly M/s Tarang Resorts Pvt. Ltd.)
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of Affordable
Group Housing Colony Project located at revenue estate of Village Baselwa, Sec-88,
Faridabad, Haryana on total plot area is 20310.158 sqm (5.01 acre). The built up area
shall be 47604.309 sqm. The proposed project shall have 06 residential towers (T1 to
T6), Basement, Stilt, Community centre, Commercial and Anganwadi Creche and 624
Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be 43.95 meter. The total
water requirement shall be 455 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 303 KLD. The
waste water generation shall be 372 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 450 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3060 KVA which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 21.40% of project
16
area. The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The
solid waste generation will be 1684 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 425
ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 2 KLD of treated water for DG
cooling also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO
unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for cooling and
management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be
submitted. .
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the above asked information
within 15 days.
Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of “Group
Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana
by M/s Dream Merchant Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Group
Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 20377.103 sqm (5.03 acre)
2. Built up area 50718.89 sqm
3. License Valid up to 27.08.2020
4. No of Floors 4 Blocks, 1 Basement, Stilt + 12 Floors.
5. No. of DU MDU 358, EWS 63
6. Height 41.6 Meter
7. Green belt 25.41%
8. Water requirement 349 KLD
17
9. Fresh Water 201 KLD
10. Waste Water 256 KLD
11. STP Capacity 320 KLD
12. Power Requirement 2750 KW, DHBVN
13 Solid Waste 985 kg/day (1 no. of OWC proposed for 689
kg/day)
14 ECS 679 ECS
15 RWH 5 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower on the
plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use
for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous
waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 96 KLD of treated water in the
drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with
location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at
village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature
Builders Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Project at village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana as
under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 20234.250 sqm (5 acre)
2. Built up area 45687.476 sqm
3. License Valid up to 03.02.2021
4. No of Floors 7 Towers GF + 14 Floors
5. Height 50.8 Meter
6. Green belt 20.17%
18
7. Water requirement 554 KLD
8. Fresh Water 341 KLD
9. Waste Water 445 KLD
10. STP Capacity 534 KLD
11. Power Requirement 3520 KW, DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 1967 kg/day
13 ECS 372 ECS
14 RWH 5 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower on the
plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use
for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous
waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The project proponent is required to give the detail of number and size of drying
beds required for storage of sludge from STP in the project area.
[5] The project proponent shall justify the use of 36.7 KLD of treated water for
horticulture with calculations.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to transport 188 KLD of treated water for
construction purposes on other sites. The project proponent is required to give
number of tankers required per day and impact of movement of vehicles on AAQ.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for propsed ‘Stone Along with Associated
Minor Minerals’ as Bakhrija Plot-2 over an area of 21.65 ha. In tehsil-
Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by M/s Tirupati Viniyoge Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Tirupati
Viniyoge Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Bakhrija Plot-2” Stone
mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Bakhrija over an area of 21.65
Ha in Tehsil- Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by imposing stipulations stated therein.
19
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)
dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 21.65 Ha having Village-
Bakhrija Plot-2. The project proponent on 04.11.2015 submitted online application along
with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in
the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy NOC from Forest
Department. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category B-1 project
as other mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been
appraised as per proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public
hearing.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village- Bakhrija, Tehsil- Narnaul, District-
Mahendergarh
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals “Bakhrija Plot-2” Khasra no. 67, 68, 73
74, 75, 76, 77 min, 78 min & 79 min- over an area
of 21.65 Ha
36,00, 000 TPA
4. Project Cost 12.50 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 40 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 21 KLD
Plantation 15 KLD
Drinking 4 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
25 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 23 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 349 to 337 36,00, 000 TPA
Second 337 to 331 36,00, 000 TPA
Third 331 to 319 36,00, 000 TPA
Fourth 319 to 307 36,00, 000 TPA
Fifth 307 to 294 36,00, 000 TPA
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 300 Trees
II Yr. 300 Trees
III Yr. 300 Trees
IV Yr. 300 Trees
V Yr. 300 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
20
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has collected the baseline
data of October 2015 to December 2015 for the preparatin of EIA/EMP. The SEAC while
approving the TOR also directed the project proponent to collect one month additional
baseline data for the month of January 2016. The project proponent on 24.05.2016
submitted final EIA/EMP by incorporating decission of public consultation and four
month baseline data. It was observed by the Authority that the project proponent has not
discussed in detail the measures to be adopted for supression of respirable particulate
matter. It was decided that the project proponent may be advised to adopt latest
technology available for supression of respirable particulate matter.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days.
[1] The project proponent shall adopt latest technology available for supression of
respirable particulate matter viz adoption of water curtain technology and submit
undertaking for the same within 15 days.
Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for proposed Stone along with Associated
Minor Minerals at Bakhrija-4 over an area of 34.64 ha Tehsil-
Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh, Haryana by M/s Gradient Business
Consulting Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Gradient
Business Consulting Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Bakhrija-4”
Stone mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Bakhrija over an area of
34.64 Ha in Tehsil-Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh, Haryana by imposing stipulations
stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 21.10.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 34.64 Ha having
Khasra no. 89 min, 90, 91, 92, 93, 101 min, 102 min and 103 village- Bakhrija-4. The
project proponent on 30.11.2015 submitted online application along with copy of
approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining
plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy of NOC from Forest
Department and certificate from Mines and Geology Department regarding non existence
of operational mine within 500 meter. The SEAC appraised this project under category
1(a) as category B-1 project as the lease area is more than 25 hac. Approval of TOR,
Public hearing has been carried out
21
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village- Bakhrija-4, Tehsil-Narnaul, District-
Mahendergarh, Haryana
3. Project Details Khasra No.
Production capacity
Mining of Stone along with Associated
Minerals Bakhrija-4, Khasra no. 89 min, 90, 91, 92,
93, 101 min, 102 min and 103 over an area of 34.64
Ha
75, 24, 000 TPA
4. Project Cost 22 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 40 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 21 KLD
Plantation 15 KLD
Drinking 4 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan
Budget
35 lakh
7. CSR Activates Budget 33 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 308 to 288 75, 24, 000 TPA
Second 298 to 268 75, 24, 000 TPA
Third 278 to 258 75, 24, 000 TPA
Fourth 268 to 248 75, 24, 000 TPA
Fifth 258 to 228 75, 24, 000 TPA
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has collected the baseline
data of November 2015 to January 2016 for the preparatin of EIA/EMP. The project
proponent on 17.06.2016 submitted final EIA/EMP by incorporating decission of public
consultation and four month baseline data. It was observed by the Authority that the
project proponent has not discussed in detail the measures to be adopted for supression of
respirable particulate matter. It was decided that the project proponent may be advised to
adopt latest technology available for supression of respirable particulate matter.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
22
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days.
[1] The project proponent shall adopt latest technology available for supression of
respirable particulate matter viz adoption of water curtain technology and submit
undertaking for the same within 15 days.
Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Complex project at
Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar
MGF Land Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to this project
was taken up for consideration in the 88th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.02.2016 and the
case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following observations.
[i] The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of
bio-degradable waste not discussed. The space allocated in the project for
management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.
[ii] The project proponent has proposed to develop 23.09% of project area under
green belt. The calculations and the plan submitted by the project proponent was
not found in order.
[iii] The parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project proponent
was not found in order. The project proponent is required to give details of
parking calculations and also indicate the dimensions of internal roads and ramp
for entry and exit from the basements on the plan.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 28.03.2016 submitted the reply which was
taken up in the 136th meeting of SEAC held on 08.07.2016. The SEAC again appraised
the project in the light of observations raised by SEIAA and recommended this project
for Environment Clearance.
The recommendations of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting it was noticed that the copy of the reply was not timely circulated to the
members and the reply further needs detailed examination. It was decided to take up the
case in the next meeting of SEIAA. Accordingly, the case was deferred.
Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for expansion of existing Panipat Institute
of Engineering and Technology 70 milestone, Pattikalayana, Smalkha,
Panipat. (Developed by Vidyapeeth Educational Trust) by Panipat
Institute of Engineering & Technology.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project
proposal from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006. Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per
guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
23
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF & CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Project at Sector-63A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,
Village Ullahwas, Tehsil Sohna, Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Sunrays Heights Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Affordable Group Housing Project at Sector-63A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,
Village Ullahwas, Tehsil Sohna, Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 23876.42 sqm
2. Built up area 63451.85 sqm
3. License Valid up to 07.08.2019
4. No of Floors 6 Blocks (4 Residential + 2 Facility Blocks)
Stilt + 14 floors
5. No. of DU 936
6. Height 44.65 Meter
7. Green belt 26.50%
8. Water requirement 666.47 KLD
9. Fresh Water 434.03 KLD
10. Waste Water 565.35 KLD
11. STP Capacity 680 KLD
12. Power Requirement 4594 KW, DHBVN
13 Solid Waste 2.47 TPD (OWC proposed for 1.48 TPD)
14 ECS 471 ECS
15 RWH 6 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
24
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Industrial Project Building
at Villate-Mohammadpur Jharsa, Pace city 2, Sector-36, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Honeywell International (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated
22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project
proposal from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006. Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per
guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to
grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject
to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF & CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project
proponent.
Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex “Orris Market
City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction
commercial complex “Orris Market City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90,
Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 15620.84 sqm (3.86 acre)
2. Built up area 45452.978 sqm
3. License Valid up to 15.07.2017
4. No of Floors 4 Blocks, 2 Basements + GF + 13 floors.
5. Height 56.6 Meter
6. Green belt 25.21%
7. Water requirement 254 KLD
8. Fresh Water 123 KLD
9. Waste Water 146 KLD
10. STP Capacity 190 KLD
11. Power Requirement 3778.50 KW, DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 580 kg/day (1 no. of OWC proposed for 406
kg/day)
13 ECS 541 ECS
14 RWH 2 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding HT line, water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
25
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 57 KLD of treated water for DG
cooling and also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO
unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for cooling and
management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be
submitted.
[5] It was also decided that Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Zero liquid discharge as proposed by project proponent.
(ii) Location of cooling tower.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 3 within 15 days and Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender
Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on
the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[28]Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex/IT
Park Project at Village Silokhera, Sector-16, Distrct-Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s Vatika One-on-One Pvt. Ltd (formerly known as M/s Calder
Developers Pvt. Ltd).
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of
Commercial Complex/IT Park Project at Village Silokhera, Sector-16, Distrct-Gurgaon,
Haryana on total plot area is 49093.349 sqm (12.13 acre). The built up area shall be
145840.991 sqm. The proposed project shall have 4 Blocks, 3 Basements + GF + 07
floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 32.105 meter. The total water
requirement shall be 339 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 81 KLD. The waste
water generation shall be 222 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 266 KLD
capacity. The total power requirement shall be 12027 KVA which will be supplied by
DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 25% of project
area. The Project Proponent has proposed to construct 13 RWH pits. The solid waste
generation will be 1051 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 2330 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
26
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the above asked information
within 15 days.
Item No.[29] Environmental Clearance for the development of “Residential Colony”
at Village Teha and Garhi Keshri, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Bigjo’s
Infraestate Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended for initiating legal action against the project
proponent as the project proponent started the construction of the project without
obtaining prior environmental clearance thus violated the provision of EIA Notification.
The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 constituted sub-committee for
inspection of site. The sub-committee visited the site on 19.03.2016 and reported that the
project proponent has submitted application seeking environmental clearance on
11.04.2013. The TOR were approved on 09.06.2014 and the project proponent on
31.08.2015 submitted final EIA/EMP. The sub-committee reported that there were no
sign of any construction activity at site however structural work for
shops/showrooms/commercial area on both sides of road has been constructed which
have been marked on the plan along with site photographs showing construction. The
sub-committee reported that the project proponent has violated the EIA Notification
dated 14.09.2006 accordingly, the SEAC has recommended for initiating legal action
against the project proponent for starting construction without obtaining prior
environment clearance.
The above recommendation was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the project proponent on 20.07.2016 has submitted a representation in
the office of Chairman SEIAA for consideration in respect of their project proposal. It
was decided to take up the case in the next meeting of SEIAA. Accordingly, the case was
deferred.
27
Item No.[30] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony at Village-Nakhrola,
Sector-81 A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Mahamay Building Solution
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of
Commercial Colony at Village-Nakhrola, Sector-81 A, Gurgaon, Haryana on total plot
area is 8120 sqm (2.006 acre). The built up area shall be 27850 sqm. The proposed
project shall have Commercial Tower, 2 Basements + GF + 11 floors. The maximum
height of the building shall be 49.71 meter. The total water requirement shall be 96
KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 40 KLD. The waste water generation shall be
70 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 85 KLD capacity. The total power
requirement shall be 2120 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project
Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 25% of project area. The Project
Proponent proposed to construct 02 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation
will be 529 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 284 ECS.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed
discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt
development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply
of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and
NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.
It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 2 KLD of fresh water for horticulture.
The project proponent is required to submit the revised water calculation for use of
treated water for horticulture and accordingly revised water balance diagram.
[4] The project is located near NH-8. The project proponent is required to carry out
traffic volume/traffic movement study to ensure no traffic congestion on the NH-8
due to the proposed activity.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the above asked information
within 15 days.
*****
1
Minutes of the 94th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 11th August 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 641-643 dated 04.08.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Group Housing
Colony located at Sector-112-113, Bajghera Road, Distt-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Lemon Tree Land and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 25 KLD of treated water for DG
cooling and also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO
unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for DG cooling and
management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be
submitted. .
[4] The project proponent has given different figures of total water requirement in the
document i.e. 1029 KLD and 1282 KLD. The project proponent is required to give
the exact quantum of total water requirement with proper calculation.
[5] It was also decided that Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit report to the SEIAA within 15
days on the following points:
(i) The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the
public sewer. The committee shall report the capacity and location of external
sewer.
(ii) To check the proposal of use of 5 KLD of treated water for water body.
(iii) To check the number and location of drying beds for storage of sludge.
(iv) In the water balance diagram for plot II the figures 308 KLD and 372 KLD not
matching.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting along with site visit report of sub-committee. The reply
2
submitted by the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the
Authority that:
[1] The information provided of serial no. 8.1, 9.6 and 9.7 of Form-1A is incomplete.
The project proponent is required to give list of building materials and their energy
efficiencies; How much energy saving has been affected and details of
transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting intensity and air-conditioning load
assumptions.
[2] The assured energy consumption @ 8 KW/sq.ft (serial no. 9.1 of Form-IA) is on
higher side. The project proponent is required to give the exact energy
consumption in accordance in the prescribed norms.
[3] (a) The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower in
plot I & plot II.
(b) The use of 25 KL and 28 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is
improper. The water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily
rather quantum of water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be
replenished daily. The project proponent is required to properly calculate
the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit
the revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water
balance diagram.
(c) The requirement of 10 KL/day of water for water body / pool is not
justified. The project proponent is required to replenish the water losses due
to evaporation. The project proponent is to properly calculate the loss of
water due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and shall resubmit the
water requirement for water body/pool and also revised water balance
diagram.
(d) The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration
that:
(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand
shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be
replenished.
(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be
thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
3
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (1.7 acres) at
Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Pursarth Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 16.5 KLD of fresh water for DG
cooling and 15+5 KLD of treated water for HVAC make up also show the location
of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment
of water prior to its use for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of
RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The validity of CLU is up to 31.07.2016. The project proponent is required to
submit validated CLU.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found
incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The information given in respect of serial no. 8.1 of Form-1A was found not
clear/sketchy. The project proponent is required to properly explain in detail the
same.
[2] The project proponent is required to give assumed energy consumption/sq.ft. of
built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).
[3] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information sought in
respect of serial no. 9.7 viz details of transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting
intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions.
[4] The information given at serial no. 9.12 and 9.1 of Form-1A is self contradictory.
The project proponent is required to explain/clarify the same.
[5] The project proponent should give clear cut plan for disposal of excess of treated
water with authenticated proof.
[6] It has been proposed to adopt Air cool technology for DG cooling on the other
hand location of cooling tower and installation of RO for treatment of treated
water prior to its use for cooling has been given. Please clarify the same.
[7] It has also been proposed to use minimum 2 KLD of RO discharge for horticulture
but the same has not been shown water balance diagram. Please clarify the same.
[8] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
4
(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand
shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be
replenished.
(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be
thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (2.34 acres)
at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Pursarth Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 18 KLD of fresh water for DG
cooling and 22+8 KLD of treated water for HVAC make up also show the location
of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment
of water prior to its use for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of
RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The validity of CLU is up to 31.07.2016. The project proponent is required to
submit validated CLU.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found
incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The information given in respect of serial no. 8.1 of Form-1A was found not
clear/sketchy. The project proponent is required to properly explain in detail the
same.
[2] The project proponent is required to give assumed energy consumption/sq.ft. of
built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).
5
[3] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information sought in
respect of serial no. 9.7 viz details of transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting
intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions.
[4] The information given at serial no. 9.12 and 9.1 of Form-1A is self contradictory.
The project proponent is required to explain/clarify the same.
[5] The project proponent should give clear cut plan for disposal of excess of treated
water with authenticated proof.
[6] It has been proposed to adopt Air cool technology for DG cooling on the other
hand location of cooling tower and installation of RO for treatment of treated
water prior to its use for cooling has been given. Please clarify the same.
[7] It has also been proposed to use minimum 2 KLD of RO discharge for horticulture
but the same has not been shown water balance diagram. Please clarify the same.
[8] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand
shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be
replenished.
(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be
thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Expansion of Residential
Plotted Colony “Sonepat Global City” at Sec-33, 34 & 35, Village
Rathdhana, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Jindal Realty Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of representative of project proponent
and their consultant. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found incomplete
and it was observed by the Authority that:
6
[1] The project proponent is required to give proper assumed energy consumption/sq.
ft. of built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).
[2] The information given in respect of serial no. 8.1 of Form-1A was found not
clear/sketchy. The project proponent is required to properly explain in detail the
same.
[3] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.
The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[4] The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for Horticulture and
Misc. use (Summer Season).
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted Colony
at Sector-33, Village Patti Kaisth Seth, Kaithal, Haryana by M/s Dhir
Construction & Builders Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of the consultant. The reply submitted by
the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to give proper assumed energy consumption/sq.
ft. of built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).
[2] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.
The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[3] The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for Horticulture and
Misc. use (Summer Season).
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
7
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony in the
Revenue Estate of Village Shikhopur, Sector-82-A, Gurgaon Manesar
Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Burman GSC Estate Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 34.09 KLD of fresh water and 90.91
KLD of treated water HVAC make up with calculations. Installation of RO unit is
also required for treatment of water prior its use for cooling and also management
of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The project proponent shall submit structural stability certificate issued by
IIT/reputed institute.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to deploy 50 number of labour for carrying of
construction of 62000 sqmt. The project proponent shall submit exact number of
labourers to be deployed, the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in
case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to use 15 KLD of fresh water for swimming
pool makeup. The project proponent is required to justify the same.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 08.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of their consultant. The reply submitted
by the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall properly explain in detail the asked information
pertaining to Sr. No. 8.1 and 8.3 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is to give the specification of chillers (Sr. No. 9.7 of Form-
IA).
[3] The use of 125 KL of treated water (soft water specification) for DG cooling per
day is improper. The water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily
rather quantum of water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be
8
replenished daily. The project proponent is required to properly calculate the water
losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the revised
treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water balance diagram.
[4] The requirement of 6 KL/day for pool make up is not justified. The project
proponent is required to replenish the water losses due to evaporation. The project
proponent is to properly calculate the loss of water due to evaporation as per
prescribed formula and to resubmit the water requirement for water body/pool
and also revised water balance diagram.
[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand
shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be
replenished.
(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be
thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above
raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval
the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony projects at Village Sohna, Sector-6, Dist- Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s Arete India Projects Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to dispose of 108 KLD of sludge at the
municipal site. The project proponent is required to submit the location of site and
assurance also.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 174 KLD of treated water in the
drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with
location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.
[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 50 KLD of treated water for
landscaping.
9
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 08.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found
incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to properly explain in detail the information
asked in respect of Sr. No. 9.1, 9.5, 9.7 and 9.11 of Form-IA and shall submit the
revised details.
[2] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of
HUDA/drain. The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to
date, carrying capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[3] The project proponent shall submit assurance of competent authority for disposal
of 108 KLD of sludge at municipal solid waste site, Bhandwari, Gurgaon.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 10 lt/sqmt of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water
requirement for horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[8]Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical
University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar, Haryana
by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the decision that project proponent should submit MOU
with the authorized vender located in 75 km radius of the project area as per the
requirement of Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, March 2016 or submit complete
plan of bio-medical waste management within the project area.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 08.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has given
undertaking MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency within 3
months after the grant of environment clearance. The information was not found in order.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision
that the project proponent may be asked to submit MOU with authorized Bio-Medical
Waste Management Agency within 15 days.
10
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
“Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent is required to submit soft copy giving complete break up of
proposed built up area.
[4] The project proponent is required to justify use of 145 KLD of treated water for
landscaping of an area of 16117 sqmt with calculations.
[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 11 KLD for Misc. use.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 174 KLD of treated water in the
drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with
location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 08.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of their consultant. The reply submitted
by the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit the specification of glass (Sr. No. 9.3 of Form-
IA).
[2] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information sought in
respect of serial no. 9.7 viz details of transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting
intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions.
[3] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of
HUDA/drain. The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to
date, carrying capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[4] The project proponent submitted the soft copy of built up area of the proposed
project. A decision was taken that Arch. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC shall
examine/verify the built up area and shall submit report to the SEIAA.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period and receipt of satisfactory report from Arch.
Hitender Singh, Member SEAC.
11
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of “Group
Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana
by M/s Dream Merchant Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower on the
plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use
for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous
waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 96 KLD of treated water in the
drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with
location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 08.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of their consultant. The reply submitted
by the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit the specification of glass (Sr. No. 9.3 of Form-
IA).
[2] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information sought in
respect of serial no. 9.7 viz details of transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting
intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions.
[3] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of
HUDA/drain. The project proponent shall submit copies of paid up to date,
carrying capacity to HUDA and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 08 Lt/sqmt of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water
requirement for horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.
[5] The use of 12 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is improper. The water
requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water
lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project
proponent is required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as
per prescribed formula and resubmit the revised treated water requirement for DG
cooling and also revised water balance diagram.
[6] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
12
(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand
shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be
replenished.
(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be
thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at
village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature
Builders Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower on the
plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use
for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous
waste” shall also be submitted.
[4] The project proponent is required to give the detail of number and size of drying
beds required for storage of sludge from STP in the project area.
[5] The project proponent shall justify the use of 36.7 KLD of treated water for
horticulture with calculations.
[6] The project proponent has proposed to transport 188 KLD of treated water for
construction purposes on other sites. The project proponent is required to give
number of tankers required per day and impact of movement of vehicles on AAQ.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found
incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall properly explain in detail the information asked of Sr.
No. 8.1, 8.3 and 9.7 of Form-IA as the same was found not clear.
[2] It has been proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by vermi-composting technique
(8.4 of Form-IA), whereas in the presentation before SEAC it has been proposed
to set up OWC for treatment of bio-degradable waste. Please clarify the same.
[3] The project proponent shall submit assumed power consumption per sqft of built
up area (9.1 of Form-IA).
13
[4] The project proponent should give clear cut plan for disposal of excess of treated
water with authenticated proof.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 05 Lt/sqmt of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water
requirement for horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision
that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above raised observation
within 15 days period.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Complex project
at Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s EMAAR
MGF Land Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to this project
was taken up for consideration in the 88th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.02.2016 and the
case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following observations.
[i] The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of
bio-degradable waste not discussed. The space allocated in the project for
management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.
[ii] The project proponent has proposed to develop 23.09% of project area under
green belt. The calculation and the plan submitted by the project proponent was
not found in order.
[iii] The parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project proponent
was not found in order. The project proponent is required to give details of
parking calculations and also indicate the dimensions of internal roads and ramp
for entry and exit from the basements on the plan.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 28.03.2016 submitted the reply which was
taken up in the 136th meeting of SEAC held on 08.07.2016. The SEAC again appraised
the project in the light of observations raised by SEIAA and recommended this project
for Environment Clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The revised parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project
proponent was not found legible. It was also found that the internal road required
for movement of fire tender is also not properly marked on the plan. The project
proponent is required to resubmit the legible traffic circulation plan (A-1 size)
clearly showing the dimensions of internal roads and road identified for smooth
movement of fire tender.
[2] The project is located near SH-13/NH-08. The project proponent is required to
carry out traffic volume/traffic movement study to ensure no traffic congestion on
the SH-13/NH-8 due to the proposed activity.
14
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above
raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval
the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group
Housing Project at Sector-63A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,
Village Ullahwas, Tehsil Sohna, Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Sunrays Heights Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 08.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found
incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall properly explain in detail the asked information
pertaining to Sr. No. 8.1 and 9.1 of Form-IA.
[2] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.
The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex “Orris Market
City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 93rd meeting of SEIAA held on 22.07.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
15
[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of
Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked
information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.
[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 57 KLD of treated water for DG
cooling and also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO
unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for cooling and
management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be
submitted.
[4] It was also decided that Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Zero liquid discharge as proposed by project proponent.
(ii) Location of cooling tower.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 06.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found
incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information sought in
respect of serial no. 9.7 viz details of transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting
intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions.
[2] The use of 57 KL of treated water for DG/HVAC cooling per day is improper.
The water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum
of water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The
project proponent is required to properly calculate the water losses due to
evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the revised treated water
requirement for DG cooling and also revised water balance diagram.
[3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand
shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be
replenished.
(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be
thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.
[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 6.7 lt/sqmt of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water
requirement for Horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.
[5] The site visit report of committee is awaited.
16
In view of the above, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision
that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period and receipt of satisfactory site inspection report of sub-
committee.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for the development of “Residential Colony”
at Village Teha and Garhi Keshri, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Bigjo’s
Infraestate Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended for initiating legal action against the project
proponent as the project proponent started the construction of the project without
obtaining prior environmental clearance thus violated the provision of EIA Notification.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] M/s Bigjo’s Infraestate Ltd on 11.04.2013 submitted Form-I, Form-IA,
Conceptual Plan for seeking environmental clearance for the development of
plotted colony under item no. 8 (b) of schedule of EIA Notification dated
14.09.2006 as proposed built up area was indicated is 244208.89 sqmt. The SEAC
in its 104th meeting held on 13.05.2014 approved the TOR required for carrying
out EIA study being category 8 (b) project.
[2] The Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana has granted license no. 208
of 2007 for development of plotted colony having total area of 72.90 Acres to the
project proponent. The project area is part of sector-6, 7 & 8 of Gannaur Township
of HUDA, Sonepat. It was noticed that as per records of SEIAA, HUDA has not
obtained prior environmental clearance for development of Township under item 8
(b) of EIA Notification. It was also not clear whether MOEF & CC, GOI had
granted EC to HUDA for development of Gannaur Township in the absence of
SEIAA. A report from CA, HUDA in the matter is required before initiating any
action.
[3] The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 constituted sub-committee for
inspection of site. The sub-committee visited the site on 19.03.2016 and reported
that the project proponent has submitted application seeking environmental
clearance on 11.04.2013. The TOR was approved on 09.06.2014 and the project
proponent on 31.08.2015 submitted final EIA/EMP. The sub-committee reported
that there were no sign of any construction activity at site however structural work
for shops/showrooms/commercial area on both sides of road has been constructed
which have been marked on the plan along with site photographs showing
construction. The sub-committee reported that the project proponent has violated
the EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 accordingly, the SEAC has recommended
17
for initiating legal action against the project proponent for starting construction
without obtaining prior environment clearance.
[4] The Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of OM of MoEF & CC, GoI
OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter no.
SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF
& CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in
view the quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response
from the MOEF & CC, GOI has been received and legal action as recommended
by SEAC in the forgoing para, cannot be initiated against M/s Bigjo’s Infraestate
Ltd at this stage.
[5] The project proponent on 20.07.2016 submitted a representation and also an
undertaking in the office of Chairman SEIAA stating that the project area is for
development of plotted colony for 72.90 Acres which is less than 50 Ha. and also
declared that they shall not be constructing the buildings on the plots as approved
in the layout plan and they shall provide services infrastructure, green belt only.
The residential plots of different sizes shall be allotted to the individuals and no
construction shall be raised by their firm. It has been further stated that the 4%
area marked for commercial/public utility services shall also be allotted to
individuals for development and shall not raise any construction on these plots.
[6] The report of sub-committee was not clear regarding calculation of already
constructed built up area and proposed built up area of commercial +
other/community buildings. Accordingly, detailed calculation of the already
constructed area and proposed constructed area was called for from Arch. Hitender
Singh, Member SEAC. The examination of report dated 10.08.2016 submitted by
Arch. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC revealed that the total area of proposed
buildings (commercial + other/community building) is 28214.22 sqmt (16511.15
sqmt commercial pocket + 11703.07 sqmt community buildings) and it has also
been reported that the project proponent has initiated construction at site in the
commercial area only.
[7] The project proponent vide letter dated 10.08.2016 again requested to de-list their
case on the basis of undertaking already submitted as the project proposal does not
fall under the ambit of EIA Notification.
In view of the above, the Authority was of the view that the project proponent has
now decided not to carry out any kind of civil construction activity in the licensed area
granted to them for development of plotted colony by Town & Country Planning
Department as per undertaking given and shall allot all the residential plots, commercial
plots, community building plots to the individuals. The Authority decided to de-list the
case as requested by the project proponent with the following decisions:
18
[1] CA, HUDA may be requested to look into the matter and inform whether the prior
environment clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 for development
of Gannaur Township by HUDA has been obtained or not?
[2] Director General, Town & Country Planning Department may be requested not to
issue any completion certificate to M/s Bigjo’s Infraestate Ltd (license no. 208 of
2007 for plotted colony) as the project proponent has intimated that they shall not
raise any civil construction of any kind of building including residential plots/
commercial plots, public utility services in the project area and the same will be
developed by individuals after obtaining necessary approvals of building plans in
their name from your department.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony at
Sector-114, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s KST Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC for initiating legal action for violation of EIA
Notification on the basis of report of sub-committee was considered in the 88th meeting of
SEIAA held on 29.02.2016. It was observed that the sub-committee reported that the
project proponent has started the construction without obtaining prior environment
clearance.
The project proponent vide letter dated 03.02.2016 requested to visit the site again
to see the actual position at site as they could not mobilize their team and co-ordinate
with committee members as information was received only one day before site visit. The
Authority decided to depute Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC to
check the status of construction and submit its report to SEIAA. A letter in this regard
was also issued on 15.03.2016.The committee visited the site on 07.05.2016 and has
submitted the report on 26.07.2016.
The site visit report submitted by the sub-committee was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It has been reported by sub-committee that a
temporary structure of 209 sqmt has been raised by the project proponent after seeking
the approval of STP Gurgaon and this structure is not the part of actual building plan. The
temporary shed on the right side of corner where a liquor vend is operational is not the
part of the project. Some portion of the site was found excavated but no sign of any work
in foundation was noticed and no material was stored at the site. The sub-committee
reported that some portion of site was excavated but safely construed that there is no
violation.
In view of the above the Authority decided to refer this case to SEAC for appraisal
and recommendation on merit as per procedure prescribed in the Notification and time to
time guidelines issued by MOEF & CC, GOI.
19
Item No. [17] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the
Environmental Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006; for development of Residential
Plotted Colony (281.577 Acre) Namely “Vatika India Next” at
Sector- 81, 82, 82A, 83 and 85, Village-Simi, Shikhopur and
Sikandarpur, Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.
The reply to the show-cause notice submitted by the project proponent on
25.03.2016 was taken up for consideration in the 92nd meeting of SEIAA held on
15.06.2016. In this meeting personal hearing was also granted to M/s Vatika Ltd. for
defending the allegations leveled by the complainant. M/s Vatika Ltd. on 21.06.2016
submitted written statement on the basis of personal hearing.
The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority
was of the unanimous view that the matter requires detailed examination and also
decided to authorize Chairman SEIAA to take decision in the this matter independently
which will be acceptable to the Authority.
Item No. [18] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the
Environmental Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006; for construction of “ATHARVA”
Group Housing project at sector-109, Village-Panwala,
Khusrupur, Gurgaon by M/s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The reply to the show-cause notice submitted by the project proponent on
25.04.2016 was taken up for consideration in the 92nd meeting of SEIAA held on
15.06.2016. In this meeting personal hearing was also granted to M/s Raheja Developers
Pvt. Ltd. for defending the allegations leveled by the complainant. M/s Raheja
Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 23.06.2016 submitted written statement on the basis of personal
hearing.
The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority
was of the unanimous view that the matter requires detailed examination and also
decided to authorize Chairman SEIAA to take decision in the this matter independently
which will be acceptable to the Authority.
Consideration of replies of EIA cases (Decided by SEIAA to grant EC subject to
satisfactory submission of reply to the observations).
Permission of Chair was obtained to consider the replies received from the project
proponent in the cases wherein a decision was taken in the last meeting of SEIAA to
grant environment clearance as recommended by SEAC subject to submission of
satisfactory reply. The reply of the following projects was considered.
[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony
measuring 13.2118 Acres at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, Dpistrict
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd & Others.
20
The reply dated 02.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting in the presence
of representative of the project proponent and Architect. The reply submitted was found
in order. It was decided to issue environment clearance letter.
[2] Environmental Clearance for “Global Industrial Park” located at Sector-72
& 73, District Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Vashisth Builders And Engineers
Ltd.
The reply dated 08.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting. It was decided
to issue environment clearance letter subject to satisfactory submission of following
information in corrected form.
[i] The project proponent is to submit location of external sewer/carrying capacity of
sewer where it has been proposed to discharge 68 KLD of treated water and also
copies of EDC/IDC paid.
[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
Colony Project located at revenue estate of Village Baselwa, Sec-88,
Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Amolik Housing Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly M/s Tarang
Resorts Pvt. Ltd.)
The reply dated 08.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting. It was decided
to issue environment clearance letter subject to satisfactory submission of following
information in corrected form.
[i] The project proponent shall properly explain the details asked at Sr. No. 8.1 and
9.7 of Form-IA.
[ii] The assumed energy consumption @ 8 KW is on higher side. Proper figures to be
given.
[iii] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.
The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex/IT Park
Project at Village Silokhera, Sector-16, Distrct-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Vatika One-on-One Pvt. Ltd (formerly known as M/s Calder Developers Pvt.
Ltd).
The reply dated 01.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting. It was decided
to issue environment clearance letter subject to satisfactory submission of following
information in corrected form.
[i] The project proponent shall properly explain the details asked at Sr. No. 8.1 and
9.7 of Form-IA.
[ii] The project proponent shall give the assumed energy consumption per sqft of built
up area as the same is not given (9.1 of Form-IA)
21
[iii] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.
The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[iv] It has been proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by vermi-composting
technique (8.4 of Form-IA), whereas in the presentation before SEAC it has been
proposed to set up OWC for treatment of bio-degradable waste. Please clarify the
same.
[v] The information given against Sr.No. 9.1 and 9.12 of Form-IA is contradictory.
The project proponent is required to explain the same.
[5] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony at Village-Nakhrola,
Sector-81 A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Mahamay Building Solution Pvt. Ltd.
The reply dated 08.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting. It was decided
to issue environment clearance letter subject to satisfactory submission of following
information in corrected form.
[i] The project proponent shall properly explain the details asked at Sr. No. 8.1 and
9.7 of Form-IA.
[ii] The project proponent shall give the assumed energy consumption per sqft of built
up area as the same is not given (9.1 of Form-IA)
[iii] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.
The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.
[iv] At Sr. No. 9.12 of Form-IA it has been mentioned that the project is centrally air
conditioner but requirement of water for HVAC make up and DG cooling has not
been shown in the revised water balance diagram submitted with reply.
*******
1
Minutes of the 95th
meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 26th
August 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for Environmental
Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No. 661-663 dated
22.08.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:- Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of “PALM VALLEY”
developed at Sec-14, Village Kot, Panchkula (Ext II) by M/s Konark Rajhans Estates (P) Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “PALM VALLEY” developed at Sec-14, Village Kot, Panchkula (Ext II) as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 40796.298 sqm. (10.08 Acres)
2. Built up area 94167.42 sqm
3. License Valid up 11.10.2016
4. Nos. of Towers 9 Towers + Basement + Stilts + 13 floors
5. Nos. of DU 682 DU, 128 EWS, 78 Servant Personal unit, Commercial Area, Community Centre
& Nursery School
6. Height 45 Meter
7. Green belt 25.12%
8. Water requirement 573 KLD
9. Fresh Water 359 KLD
10. Waste Water 455 KLD
11. STP Capacity 550 KLD
12 Power Requirement 4500 KW UHBVN
13. Solid Waste 1840 kg/day (OWC proposed for 1288
kg/day)
14. ECS 1062 ECS
15. RWH 10 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] Different figures of water calculation has been given in Form-I and presentation
i.e. @ 150 lt/person in Form-I and @ 135 lt/person in presentation. Revised Form-
I with proper calculation to be submitted. [2] Operational Tube-well exists in the project area. Permission of CGWA for
abstraction of ground water is required.
2
[3] Kholhai Raitan Wild Life Sanctuary is located at a distance of 4.7 km. Permission
of National Wild Life Board is required. Proof of submission of application for
Wild Life clearance is required.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office. Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex
project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 91st
meeting of SEIAA held on 06.05.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations. [1] The License no. 44 of 2010 measuring 128.94 Acres has been granted for
development of plotted colony. The total saleable area of the license is 47.844 Acres
(45.884 Acres for plotted development + 2 Acres for commercial). The commercial
pocket earmarked in the approved layout plan is integral part of plotted colony and
the separate application for environmental clearance for the commercial pocket (2
Acre) cannot be considered as the license has been granted for plotted colony and not
for development of commercial project. [2] The present proposal of independent commercial complex is also practically not viable as
the commercial area is in continuation of the plotted colony area and for access to the
commercial pocket the project proponent shall have to use land of plotted area. Therefore
the project proponent is required to seek environmental clearance for plotted colony
along with the commercial complex. [3] The proposal submitted by the project proponent for independent commercial
complex do not conform to the approved layout plan because as per approved
layout plan the project proponent is also required to develop the below mentioned
units in 2 Acres of commercial complex:
(i) Clinic (2 nos. of 250 sqm each)
(ii) ATM (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)
(iii) Beauty parlor (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)
(iv) Multipurpose booth (2 nos. of 5x5.5 meter each)
(v) Sub Post Office (1 no. of 40 sqm)
Where as, the project proponent has failed to show the above units in the commercial pocket.
3
[4] It is not clear whether the project proponent has undertaken the development of plotted
colony as no photographs of the site has been submitted with application. The license has
been granted in the year 2010 and is now renewed up to 08.06.2016. The project
proponent is required to give justified reasons for not starting development of plotted
colony. The Director of the company shall submit an undertaking with the declaration
that the development of the plotted colony has not been started and shall submit latest
photograph of the licensed area.
The SEAC in its 137th
meeting held on 28.07.2016 referred the matter to the SEIAA
with the observation that the instant case has been submitted by project proponent in the
name of M/s JMS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. which is a part of the plotted colony of M/s
Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd, Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana. The License was granted to M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd for an area of 128.94
Acres (51.7998 Ha). The license had now expired and whether Environmental Clearance can
be considered in such cases may be decided by the SEIAA and also whether environment
clearance can be considered in the name of M/s JMS buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed
that M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd. has sold the land of commercial area under
consideration for environmental clearance to M/s JMS Buildtech Ptv. Ltd. and M/s JMS
Buildtech pvt. Ltd. has approached SEAC and submitted fresh application in the name of
JMS Buildtech for appraisal by SEAC during the 137th
meeting of SEAC. It was also
observed that the license granted to the M/s Ramprasta Estate for development of plotted
colony has also expired and the name of M/s JMS buildtech Pvt. Ltd is also not included as
one of the licensee in the license. It was decided do defer the case to the next meeting as
detailed study in the matter is required. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next
meeting. Item No.[3]Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Cum
Commercial Complex” at Sector-79, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Robust Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 92nd
meeting of SEIAA held on 15.06.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations. [1] The licenses submitted by the project proponent are not valid. [2] The project proponent shall justify the use of 4 KLD of water for Tyre washing.
[3] The project proponent shall submit detailed break up of 20 KLD of water
proposed to be used during construction phase. [4] The project proponent shall submit the water balance diagram during monsoon
period.
4
[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 6 litre/sqmt of treated water for
irrigation/horticulture purposes. The project proponent shall give the proper
justification. [6] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting up of
STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan. The Project Proponent
on 08.07.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of
the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 137th
meeting held on 29.07.2016 and
SEAC again has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The water demand during construction phase has been proposed as 19 KLD out of
which 4 KLD treated water for curing but for how much period/days this demand will
persist was not clear as the water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The
project proponent is required to submit the exact time period during which 4 KLD of
treated water will be required for curing of concrete floor and shall submit revised
water calculation. [2] It has been proposed to discharge 86 KLD of treated water to public sewer/tankers. The
project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan or authenticated proof in the
shape of undertaking/MOU for supply of treated water to the nearby sites with proper
justification for their construction and also the impact on the AAQ due to movement of
tankers for transportation of the same.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office. Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for propsed Group Housing Colony project
“The Melia” located at Village Mohammadpur Gujjar, Sector-35, Sohna Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DSS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 92nd
meeting of SEIAA held on 15.06.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations. [1] The project proponent on 31.05.2015 uploaded online application with MOEF & CC,
GOI. The EAC of MOEF & CC, GOI on 19.07.2015 approved the TOR for preparation
of EIA/EMP whereas the project proponent collected the data during March 2015 to May
2015 i.e. prior to approval of TOR and even submission of application. The study carried
out before submission of application by the
5
project proponent is not in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the
notification. [2] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting up of
STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan. [3] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction
phase with detailed break up. [4] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase. [5] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building. [6] The project proponent has proposed to supply 228 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures. [7] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for DG set Cooling but
the location of cooling tower has not been shown. The project proponent is
required of show the cooling tower on the plan. The project proponent is advised
to adopt Air Cooling Technology i.e. Radiator/ cooling coil in order to save the
water.
The Project Proponent on 08.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of
the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 137th
meeting held on 29.07.2016 and
SEAC again has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] It has been informed that approval for supply of 60 KLD of treated water from STP of
Behrampur Gurgaon has been obtained vide letter no, 910 dated 07.11.2014. The
project proponent is required to submit copy of the same. [2] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they will set up
STP in the labour camp area during construction phase if waste water generation
exceeds 10 KLD. [3] The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof in the shape of
undertaking/MOU for supply of treated water to the nearby sites for their
construction.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to
accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions subject to the satisfactory
submission of the clarification on the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided
that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
6 information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office. Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Project at
Sector-53, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vipul Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of
Residential Project at Sector-53, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 77877.581 sqm. (19.244 Acres)
2. Built up area 208429.182 sqm
3. License Valid up 12.03.2018
4. Nos. of Towers 3 Towers + 3 Basement + Stilts +37 floors
5. Nos. of Apartments 382
6. Height 142.85 Meter
7. Green belt 35.203%
8. Water requirement 442.41 KLD
9. Fresh Water 243.64 KLD
10. Waste Water 321 KLD
11. STP Capacity 325 KLD
12 Power Requirement 3540.53 KWUHBVN
13. Solid Waste 979 kg/day (OWC proposed for 587.4
kg/day)
14. ECS 3125 ECS
15. RWH 20 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they will provide
Multi stage pumping sets for pumping of water. [2] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8.4 (vermi
composting), 8.1 & 8.3 of Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly
explain the same [3] The height of the building is 142.85 Meter. The project proponent is required to
submit legible copy of plan approved by fire department showing internal road for
movement of fire tender. [4] The water demand during construction phase has been proposed as 15.75 KLD out of
which 10 KLD treated water for curing but for how much period/days this demand
will persist was not clear as the water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The
project proponent is required to submit the exact time period during which 10 KLD of
treated water will be required for curing of concrete floor and shall submit revised
water calculation.
7 [5] The requirement of 20 KL/day of water for water body / pool is not justified. The
project proponent is required to replenish the water losses due to evaporation. The
project proponent is to properly calculate the loss of water due to evaporation as
per prescribed formula and shall resubmit the water requirement for water
body/pool and also revised water balance diagram. [6] The project proponent has proposed to use 07 Lt/sqmt of treated water for landscaping
which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for
horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [7] The project proponent has proposed 4.6 KLD for road washing just to attain zero
exist discharge. The requirement of 4.6 KLD is on higher side. The project
proponent is required to justify the same. [8] The project proponent in the affidavit dated 12.07.2016 has stated to use 100 KLD of
treated water for construction on the contrary in the project report it has been mentioned
15+5 KLD the project proponent is required to justify the same.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office. Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony at
Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s JMK Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 92nd
meeting of SEIAA held on 15.06.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.
[1] The project proponent has mentioned the depth of ground water table at 4 meter.
The project proponent is required to submit authenticated proof of some
government agency/CGWB. [2] No environmental safe guards have been suggested in recommendations for the
safety / protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of
ground water table at 4 meter. [3] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting up of
STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan. [4] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction
phase with detailed break up. [5] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management
during construction phase. [6] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level
of tallest building.
8
[7] The project proponent has proposed to supply 401 KLD treated water to tankers
for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures. [8] The project proponent shall earmark the space reserved for setting up of OWC for
treatment of Bio-degradable waste in the project area. [9] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of water for horticulture. The
project proponent is required to justify the same with proper calculations.
The SEAC in its 137th
meeting held on 29.07.2016 considered the reply dated 29.06.2016 submitted by the project proponent to the observations raised by SEIAA and again
recommended this project for environment clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration the today’s meeting. It was observed that the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has not suggested environmental safe guards for the safety /
protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of ground
water table at 4 meter in his reply. The SEAC has also not reported the same in the
recommendation. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [2] The project proponent has not given the detail of break up of water requirement for
construction. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [3] The project proponent is required to give the specifications/dimensions of the area
reserved for setting up of STP and OWC as the same has not been given in the
reply. [4] The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof/MOU for supply of 399
KLD of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction. [5] The water requirement for horticulture @ 9 lt./sqm is on the higher side. The
project proponent is required to revise the same and also to submit revised water
balance diagram.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period to all the members of the Authority. Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for “Ware House” at Village-LowaKhurd,
Dist-Jhajjar, Haryana by M/s RelaxoFootwears Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Ware House” at Village-
LowaKhurd, Dist-Jhajjar, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 45945.15 sqm. (111.35Acres)
9
2. Built up area 34182.994 sqm
3. CLU Granted on 01.09.2012 valid up to 2 years
from the date of issuance
4. Nos. of Towers 3 Towers + 3 Basement + Stilts +37 floors
5. Height 21 Meter
6. Green belt 20.23%
7. Water requirement 28 KLD
8. Fresh Water 15 KLD
9. Waste Water 14 KLD
10. STP Capacity 20 KLD
11. Power Requirement 240 KWUHBVN
12 Solid Waste 272 kg/day
13. ECS 104 ECS
14. RWH 8 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The CLU has been granted for setting up of Warehouse on 01.09.2012. The
existing built up area is 15402.3 sqmt and proposed built up area is 18780 sqmt
(total 34182.9 sqmt). It is a case of expansion and not new as indicated in Form-I.
The project proponent is required to rectify Form-I. [2] The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is
operational and complete and construction was started after getting the approval
for building plan of 15402 sqmt and the construction has been carried out in
accordance with the approved plans. [3] It has been proposed to use 4 KLD treated water for curing for expansion of
project but for how much period/days this demand will persist was not clear as the
water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The project proponent is
required to submit the exact time period during which 4 KLD of treated water will
be required for curing of concrete for construction of expansion and shall submit
revised water calculation. [4] The water requirement for miscellaneous use in the existing area is shown as 1
KLD whereas use of 5 KLD has been shown after expansion. The project
proponent is required to justify the same as how the water requirement for
miscellaneous use has increased from 1 KLD to 5 KLD. [5] The project proponent shall submit green belt development plan of existing unit
covering 4594.515 sqm and on 4795.635 sqm proposed under expansion i.e. total
9387.15 sqm.
10
[6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the SEIAA
within 15 days on the following points:
(i) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using
treated water.
(ii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(iii) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(iv) Observations raised by SEIAA 1 to 5 above.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days and Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated
above within 15 days period. Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
Village-Sarai Alawardi, Sector-110, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Snowdrop Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group Housing Project
Village-Sarai Alawardi, Sector-110, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 41480.213 sqm. (10.25Acres)
2. Built up area 96969.542sqm
3. License Valid up to 22.08.2019
4. Nos. of Towers 9 Towers + 2 Basement, Residential
Apartments, EWS Apartments, Community
facile-ties, convenient Shopping, Nursery
School.
Nos. of Units Total units 639 (465 Residential, 76 Service
personal units, 98 EWS)
5. Height 77.47 Meter (NOC AAI not obtained)
6. Green belt 72.32%
7. Water requirement 678 KLD
8. Fresh Water 312 KLD
9. Waste Water 407 KLD
10. STP Capacity 490 KLD
11. Power Requirement 4400 KWDHBVN
12 Solid Waste 272 kg/day
13. ECS 1062 ECS
14. RWH 8 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
11 involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent shall give the exact green belt development plan within the
zoned area where development is to be taken along with calculations. [2] The traffic circulation plan, entry and exit points given in the plan not clear if
compared with zoning plan. The project proponent is required to provide sufficient
width of internal road to ensure smooth movement of vehicles and shall submit
revised traffic circulation plan specially showing internal road earmarked for
movement of fire tender. [3] The project proponent shall submit NOC from AAI and structural stability
certificate. [4] The project proponent shall submit location of STP and solid waste management
site on the plan with specification of area. [5] The project proponent shall submit assurance of water during construction phase
issued by competent authority. [6] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information asked against
sr. no. 9.1, 9.7, 9.12; and also clarify the contradictory information given under 9.7
and 9.12 of Form-IA. [7] The use of 41 KL of treated water for DG/HVAC cooling per day is improper. The water
requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water lost due
to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project proponent is
required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed
formula and resubmit the revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also
revised water balance diagram. [8] The project proponent is required justify and submit authenticated proof in the
shape of undertaking/MOU for supply of treated water 120 KLD and 60 KLD in
monsoon and winter season.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office. Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project at Village
Khanpur and Kawarsika, Sector-17, Sohna, Tehsil Nuh, Mewat, Haryana by
M/s Goldsouk Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd,
This case was lastly considered in the 90th
meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations:
12
[1] The project proponent was asked to submit reply with respect to observation “Impact
on ambient air quality due to increased traffic volume needs to be evaluated” whereas
the project proponent has given a vague reply. The project proponent is required to
give the values of existing AAQ of the project area, predicted values of AAQ due to
increased traffic volume and detailed mitigation measures to be adopted for
management of environment. [2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in case
the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above. [3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 182 KLD to water tankers for
construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same
specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the
impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and
mitigation measures.
The SEAC in its 138th
meeting held on 04.08.2016 and the SEAC referred to SEIAA for taking further necessary action as per the information provided by project
proponent that the three observations raised by SEIAA in the said meeting are not valid
in light of the MoEF letter dated 10.11.2015.
The case as referred by SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was decided by the Authority that: [1] Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection
to check the status of construction if any and shall also submit the report on the
observation of SEIAA (1-3) as indicated above within 15 days
period.
In view of the above the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. R. K.
Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the
report of the observation of SEIAA within 15 days period. Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Expansion of Group Housing
Complex” at Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s Ruhil Promoters
Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s Kashi Promoters Pvt)
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Expansion of Group Housing Complex” at Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 43090.93 sqm (Existing 36699.36 sqm.
+Expansion 6391.57) (10.6 Acres)
2. Built up area 112924.37 sqm (Existing 98641.44sqm +
Expansion 14282.93 sqm )
3. License Valid up 12.08.2019
4. Nos. of Towers 10 Towers + EWS + 01 Basement +
13
G+13/S+12
5. Nos. of DU 674 DU, 119 EWS, 68 Servant units,
Commercial, Nursery School, Community
building
6. Height 43.35 Meter
7. Green belt 25.08%
8. Water requirement 665 KLD
9. Fresh Water 352 KLD
10. Waste Water 450 KLD
11. STP Capacity 540 KLD
12 Power Requirement 4340 KWUHBVN
13. Solid Waste 1714 kg/day (02 nos. of OWC proposed for
1200 kg/day)
14. ECS 1104 ECS
15. RWH 11 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] Ground water table is very shallow (8 meter) construction of one level basement
has been proposed. The project proponent has not suggested environmental safe
guards for the safety / protection of proposed building structure keeping in view
the depth of ground water table [2] The project proponent is required to submit the water balance diagram for all the
seasons. [3] The use of 38 KLof treated water for DG cooling per day is improper. The water
requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water lost
due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project proponent
is required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed
formula and resubmit the revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also
revised water balance diagram. [4] The project proponent has proposed to use 10 lt/sqmt of treated water for landscaping
which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for
horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [5] The project proponent shall give the breakup of use of 15 KLD of treated water
for miscellaneous use. [6] The project proponent has proposed to use jute bags in construction (8.3 of Form
IA). The project proponent is required to explain the same in detail along with the
process involved. [7] The project proponent has proposed to transport 115 KLD of treated water for
construction purposes on other sites. The project proponent is required to give
14
number of tankers required per day and impact of movement of vehicles on AAQ.
The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof/MOU for supply of 115 KLD
of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction. [8] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points: (i) Water balance diagram of existing project and proposed project for expansion. (ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans. (iii) Status of construction in expansion part if any. (iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using treated
water. (v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste. (vii) Reply to the observations from sr. no.1 to 7 as above.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 7 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.
Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the
points as indicated above within 15 days period. Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group
Housing Colony project at Village Dhamlaka, Sector-26 & 27,
Rewari, Haryana by M/s B.M Gupta Developers Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 90th
meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations: [1] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 221.6 KLD of treated water in the Drain
which is not acceptable. The project proponent is required to submit revised proposal
ensuring that the treated waste water is recycled/reused and excess of treated waste water
is discharged in public sewer system. [2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for
construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment
scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in case
the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above. [3] The height of the building is 75.45 meters the project proponent is required to
obtained structural stability certificate from the competent authority. [4] The project proponent has given different figures of stack height 2.82 meter (in
presentation copy) and 6.32 meter (in conceptual plan) above the building height.
The project proponents clarify the same.
15
[5] The project proponent has not discussed in detail the storm water management
plan during construction phase. The project proponent is required to submit the
same. [6] In the soil investigation report it has been mentioned that the ground water table was
encountered at 9.5 to 9.9 meter depth, whereas as per Draft Revised Regional Plan-2021 the
average ground water table of Rewari is 16.3 meter. The project proponent is required to
clarify the same with authenticated proof/document.
The Project Proponent on 29.06.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of
the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 138th
meeting held on 04.08.2016 and
SEAC again has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The
recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has not submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid up to date,
location of HUDA sewer on plan. The project proponent is required to submit the
same.
After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice subject to submission of
above asked information within 15 days. Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for extension of validity of EC for Group
Housing Colony at Sector-48, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sweta Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The case referred by SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the project proponent had obtained environment clearance from MoEF,
GoI on 10.04.2007 having built up area of 331520 sqm under item no. 8 (b). The site was
inspected by the Director, Northern RO, MoEF & CC, GoI, Chandigarh on 06.11.2015 and
the report was submitted to M.S, SEIAA on 30.11.2015, wherein it was stated that project
proponent will be submitting an application seeking approval for extension of the validity
period of the EC; whereas in the present case project proponent has submitted application for
Expansion of their project having built up area of 562141.739 sqm. It was observed by the Authority:
[1] The MoEF, GoI granted environmental clearance for development of Group
Housing project having built up area 331520 sqm under item 8 (b) of EIA
Notification vide letter dated 10.04.2007.
[2] As per MoEF, GoI Notification 14.09.2006 and subsequent amendment
29.04.2015 the validity of EC in case of Township/ Area development project
8 (b) the validity of EC is limited only to such activities as may be the
responsibility of the applicant as a developer:
16
[3] It was decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Status of the construction achieved with details.
(ii) Whether the construction has been carried out in accordance with the
approved plans or not?
(iii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(iv) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site
for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days
period. Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for expansion of Group Housing
Colony at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 224719.152 sqm (Existing 111263.082 sqm.
+Expansion 113456.07) (55.52940 Acres)
2. Built up area 748942.655sqm (Existing 370035.157sqm +
Expansion 325891.407sqm )
3. License Valid up 25.08.2019
4. Proposed project Residential building, commercial area,
comprise community centre, primary and nursery
school
6. Height 192.9 Meter(AAI obtained)
7. Green belt 31.52%
8. Water requirement 3833 KLD
9. Fresh Water 2390 KLD
10. Waste Water 3168 KLD
11. STP Capacity 3800 KLD
12 Power Requirement 21793 KVADHBVN
13. Solid Waste 13788 kg/day (08 nos. of OWC proposed
for 1250 kg/day)
14. ECS 7208 ECS
15. RWH 57 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
17 involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The height of the building 192.9 meter. The project proponent is required to
submit fire safety plan showing smooth movement of fire tender within the
project area. [2] It was decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC s
hall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the SEIAA
within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Status of the construction achieved of existing project with details.
(ii) Status of construction of expansion project if any.
(iii) Whether the construction has been carried out in accordance with the
approved plans or not?
(iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using
treated water.
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(vii) Reply to the observation raised at point [1] above.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision the project proponent shall submit reply to the observation raised at sr. no. 1
above and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site
for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days
period. Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed expansion of our IT/ITES
Project, at plot no. 20, Panchkula Technology Park, Sector-22,
Panchkula, Haryana by M/s JSK Multi Projects Pvt. Ltd.
(Formerly known as M/s Kansan News Pvt. Ltd.)
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for expansion of our
IT/ITES Project, at plot no. 20, Panchkula Technology Park, Sector-22, Panchkula,
Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 7463.74sqm(1.84Acres)allotted by
HSIIDC Dated 13.08.2010
2. Built up area 26367.62sqm(Existing17370.03 sqm +
Expansion 8997.59 sqm)
3. Allotment of plot from Plot allotted by HSIIDC
HSIIDC
4. Nos. of Floors Lower Basement + Upper Basement + GF
+08 floors.
5. Height 40 Meter
6. Green belt 30.71%
18
7. Water requirement 180 KLD
8. Fresh Water 50 KLD
9. Waste Water 156 KLD
10. STP Capacity 175 KLD
11. Power Requirement 1967.9 KWUHBVN
12 Solid Waste 930 kg/day (02 nos. of OWC proposed for
558 kg/day)
13. ECS 543 ECS
14. RWH 2 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The information related to sr. no. 21 of Form-I not clear. The project proponent
has not given the nearest location of Wild Life Sanctuary. The project proponent is
required to submit the same.
[2] The information of point no. 8.3 and 9.1 of Form IA not properly replied. The
project proponent required to submit the revised proper details.
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 6.1 Lt/sqmt of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side considering surface green area and terrace
green area. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for
horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [4] It was noticed that the project proponent has already constructed 17370.03 sqm of
building. The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is
operational and complete and construction was started after getting the approval
for building plan of 17370.03 sqm and the construction has been carried out in
accordance with the approved plans. [5] The project proponent is required to submit compliances of the conditions of CTE
and CTO obtained from HSPCB. [6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC s hall
visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the SEIAA
within 15 days on the following points:
(i) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using
treated water.
(ii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(iii) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(iv) Reply to the observation raised at point [1 to 5] above.
19
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation (point no. 1 to 5) within 15 days and Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh.
S.C.Mann Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report
on the points as indicated above within 15 days period. Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex
at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Deepanshu
Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Expansion of Group Housing
Complex at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 59258.025sqm (14.64 Acres)
2. Built up area 158812.61sqm (Existing 148623.86sqm +
Expansion 10188.75sqm )
3. License Valid up 02.12.2016
4. Nos. of Towers 17 Blocks + 02 Basements + Stilt +
GF +21 floors
5. Nos. of DU 738 DU, 132 EWS, 108 Servant units,
6. Height 70.3 Meter (AAI obtained)
7. Green belt 30.43%
8. Water requirement 742 KLD
9. Fresh Water 435 KLD
10. Waste Water 542 KLD
11. STP Capacity 660 KLD
12 Power Requirement 5749.58 KWDHBVN
13. Solid Waste 1882 kg/day (02 nos. of OWC proposed for
1317 kg/day)
14. ECS 1410 ECS
15. RWH 14 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli
Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] Different figures of built up area has been given in Form I and presentation copy. The project
proponent is required to clarify the exact proposed built up area of existing project, proposed
under expansion and total built up area after expansion. [2] The project proponent is required to give proper information of point no, 8.3 of
Form IA. [3] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
20
[4] The use of 24.3 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is improper. The water
requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water lost
due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project proponent
is required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed
formula and resubmit the revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also
revised water balance diagram. [5] The project proponent has proposed to use 90 KLD of treated water for landscaping
which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for
horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [6] It has been proposed to discharge 208 KLD of treated water to public sewer/tankers. The
project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying
capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan. [7] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.
(ii) Status of construction in expansion part if any.
(iii) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using
treated water.
(iv) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(v) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(vi) Reply to the observation raised at point [1 to 6] above.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 7 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.
Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the
points as indicated above within 15 days period. Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Boulder, Gravel and Sand” (Minor
Mineral) at Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28 over an area of 23.20 Ha.
inTehsil- Chhachhrauli , Distrct-Yamuna Nagar by Sh.
Karaj Singh.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Sh. Karaj
Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Village- Malikpur
Khadar Block/ YNR B-28, Tehsil-Kalka Chhachhrauli , Distrct-Yamuna Nagar Haryana
over an area of 23.20 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It
was noticed tha t the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 08 years
subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
21
(LOI) dated 14.09.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 23.20 Ha having Village
Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28. The project proponent on 20.11.2015 submitted online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy
NOC from Forest Department. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category
B-1 project as other mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has
been appraised as per proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public
hearing.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village- Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28
3. Project Details Khasra No. “Boulder, Gravel and Sand” (Minor Mineral) at Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28 inTehsil-
Chhachhrauli over an area of 23.20 Ha.
Production capacity 4,00, 000 TPA @ 53 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 1.95 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 32 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 24 KLD
Plantation 6.80 KLD
Drinking 1.20 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 21.50 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 17 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
4,00, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will
be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is
291.85 amsl to 292.2 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area Block Latitude Longitude
Malikpur 30°15'29"N 77°26 '55"E
Khadar Block/ 30°15'47"N 77°27 '22"E
YNR B-28
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 500 Trees
II Yr. 500 Trees
III Yr. 500 Trees
IV Yr. 500 Trees
V Yr. 500 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day. The
project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
22
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil.
[2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days. Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Boulder, Gravel and Sand”
(Minor Mineral) at Pipli Majra Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31 over an area of 18.20 Ha. inTehsil- Chhachhrauli District Yamuna Nagar by Sh. Paramjeet Singh.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Sh.
Paramjeet Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at PipliMajra
Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31 in Tehsil- Chhachhrauli District Yamuna Nagar over an area
of 18.20 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 07
years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated
14.09.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 18.20 Ha having Village- Pipli Majra
Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31. The project proponent on 20.11.2015 uploaded online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category B-1 project as
other mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been
appraised as per proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public
hearing.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in 1 (a) B-1
schedule):
2. Location of Project Pipli Majra Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli District Yamuna Nagar
23
3. Project Details Khasra Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral at No. Pipli Majra Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31 over an area of
18.20 Ha.
Pipli Majra YNR B-29 6//21/1, 21/2, 7//25,
12//4,4,5,6,7,8/1,8/2,13,14,15,16/1,16/2,17,18,19/1,19/2,
21/1,21/2,22,23,13//1,10,11
Pipli Majra YNR B-30 16//12,13,19,20,21
17//16,17,23,24,25,
Pipli Majra YNR B-31 20//2,3,4,5,9
6//15,16,17,24,25,5//20,21,22,14//1,2,3,10,13//4,5,6/1,6/2,7
Production capacity 370, 000 TPA @ 50 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 1.80 crores
5. Water Requirement & 26 KLD through Tankers
Source Dust suppression 9 KLD
Plantation 6.80 KLD
Drinking 1.20 KLD
6. Environment Management 20.50 lakh
Plan Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 15.00 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 370, 000
TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be 9 meter. The
alivation range of mine site is 291.85 amsl to 292.2 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the
lease area Block Latitude Longitude
Pipli Majra 30°15'20.5"N 77°26 '29"E
Block/YNR B- 30°15'32.5"N 77°26 '44"E
29
Pipli Majra 30°15'6.5"N 77°26 '43"E
Block/YNR B- 30°15'16.5"N 77°27 '0.5"E
30
Pipli Majra 30°15'26.5"N 77°26 '49"E
Block/YNR B- 30°15'36.5"N 77°27 '02"E
31
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 500 Trees
II Yr. 500 Trees
III Yr. 500 Trees
IV Yr. 500 Trees
V Yr. 500 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day. The
project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
24
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil.
[2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days. Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for proposed Sand Minor Mineral Mines at
Jaidhar Block /YNR B-34 over an area of 25.60 ha. inTehsil-Chhachhrauli,DistrictYamuna Nagar by M/s Saharanpur Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Saharanpur
Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd for Mining of Sand Minor Mineral Mines at Jaidhar
Block /YNR B-34 in Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, DistrictYamuna Nagar over an area of 25.60 ha.
by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 08
years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated
20.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 25.60 ha having Village- Jaidhar Block
/YNR B-34. The project proponent on 23.11.2015 uploaded online application along with
copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the
Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained. The SEAC in its
125th
meeting held on 12.01.2016 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public hearing was
held on 09.04.2016. The study period is 1st
November 2015 to 31 January 2016. Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Jaidhar Block /YNR B-34 in Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, DistrictYamuna Nagar
3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Sand Minor Mineral Mines at Jaidhar
Block /YNR B-34 inTehsil-
Chhachhrauli,DistrictYamuna Nagar over an area of
Jaidhar Block /YNR B-34 25.60 ha.
25
27//12,13,14,16/1,16,2,17,18/1,18/2,19,20,21,22,23,
24,25,26//25/1,25,2,33//5,32//1/1,1/2,2,3,4/1,4/2,
4/3,5,6,7,8,9,10,13,14,15,16,17,31//1,2,3,6,7/1,7/2,
8,9,10,11,12/1,12/2,13/1,13/2,14/1,14/2,15
16/1,16/2,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25/1,25/2,43//2,
3,4,4/1,4/2,5,6,
30//11,19,20/1,20/2,21,22,23,44//1,2,3
Production capacity 4,60,000 TPA @ 61 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 9 crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 36 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 24.50 KLD
Plantation 10.00 KLD
Drinking 1.5 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 24.50 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 16.25 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
4,60,000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will
be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 282
amsl to 283 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area Block Latitude Longitude
Jaidhar Block 30°13'42"N 77°24'30"E
/YNR B-34 30°13'50"N 77°24'42.5"E
30°13'36"N 77°24'06"E
30°13'44"N 77°24'52.5"E
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day.
The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
26
(i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days. Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for proposed Stone along with Associated Minor
Minerals at Kheribattar Plot 2, over an area of 42.0 HaTehsil-Dadri
District-Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s ASD RKC J.V.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s ASD RKC
J.V. for Mining of Stone along with Associated Minor Minerals at Kheribattar Plot 2,
over an area of 42.0 HaTehsil- Dadri District-Bhiwani, Haryana by imposing stipulations
stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 12
years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated
21.10.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 42.0 Ha having Village-Kheribattar Plot
2. The project proponent on 30.11.2015 submitted online application along with copy of
approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan
is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy NOC from Forest Department. The
SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category B-1 project as other mine lease
area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been appraised as per proper
procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public hearing. Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village- Kheribattar Plot 2, Tehsil-Dadri District- Bhiwani, Haryana over an area of 42.0 Ha.
3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Stone along with Associated Minerals
“Kheribattar Plot 2”, over an area of 42.0 Ha
Khasra no.139, 140 & 141 min
Production capacity 81,66,000 MT/Year (27220 Ton/day)
4. Project Cost 4.23 Crores
27
5. Water Requirement & Source 10 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 4 KLD
Plantation 4 KLD
Drinking 2 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 54 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 24.5 Lakh
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 381,372,363,354,336,327 70 lakh MT
Second 327, 318, 309, 300 70 lakh MT
Third 300, 291, 282 75 lakh MT
Fourth 282 & 273 80 lakh MT
Fifth 264 & 255 81.66 lakh
MT
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 700 Trees
II Yr. 700 Trees
III Yr. 700 Trees
IV Yr. 700 Trees
V Yr. 700 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day.
The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent in the proposed crushing plan has proposed to provide sprinkling
water system or putting ceil on the “Transfer Points” to arrest the fugitive particles is not
proper/justified. The project proponent is required to install
APCM i.e. Dust Suppression/Dust Extraction Systems. The project proponent is
required to submit the same [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place.
28
(iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions as category B-2 in
view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 subject to satisfactory reply to the below
mentioned observation within 15 days.
Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral Mines of “Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” over an area of 48.60 Ha. inTehsil Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar by M/s P.S.Buildtech.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
P.S.Buildtech for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” in Tehsil Chhachhrauli District-Yamuna Nagar over an area of 48.60
Ha. by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 08
years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated
30.11.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 48.60 Ha having Village- Jaidhari
Block/YNR B 33. The project proponent on 04.01.2016 uploaded online application along
with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in
the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained. The SEAC
in its 125th
meeting held on 12.01.2016 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public hearing
was held on 23.05.2016. The study period is December 2015 to February 2016. Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project “Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” in Tehsil Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar
3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral
at “Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” in Tehsil
Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar over an area
of 48.60 Ha.
Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33 31//4,5,6,7,14,15,16/1,16/2,17,24,25,
32//1 to 9,11 to 16,18 to 25,
33//1,2,3,4/1,4/2,5,6,7/1,7/2,8,9,10,11/1,11/2,12,13,
14/1,14/2,15,16,17/1,17/2,18,19,20,21/1,21/2,22,23,
24/1,24/2,25/1,25/2,25/3
34//1,2,9,10,11,12,19,20,21/1,21/2,22,
41//4,5/1,5/2,6,7
19//21/22,
20//21,22,23,24,25,
21//21,22,23,24,25,
22//24,25,
38//1/1,1/2,2/1,2/2,9/1,9/2,10,11/1,11/2,
12/1,12/2,19/1,19/2,20,21,22,
39//1 to 17,24,25,
50//4,5,6,7,14/15,
51//1,2,9,10,11,12
29
Production capacity 9, 10,000 TPA @ 121 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 9.00 crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 66 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 50 KLD
Plantation 13 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 18.00 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 20.25 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @
9,10,000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will
be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 275
amsl to 284 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area Block Latitude Longitude
Pipli Majra 30°13'58"N 77°25 '30"E
Block/YNR B- 30°14'25"N 77°26 '05"E
29
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 600 Trees
II Yr. 600 Trees
III Yr. 600 Trees
IV Yr. 600 Trees
V Yr. 600 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day.
The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
30 the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15 days.
Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for proposed Stone along with Associated Minor Minerals at ‘Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’ over an area of 11.26 Ha. in Tehsil - Narnaul, District Mahendergarh Haryana by M/s Madaan Associates.
The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s
Madaan Associates for Mining of Stone along with Associated Minor Minerals at ‘Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’over an area of 11.26 Ha. in Tehsil - Narnaul, District Mahendergarh
Haryana by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It
was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 10 years
subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 24.07.2015. The
lease has been granted for an area of 11.26 Ha having Village-Bakhrija (Plot-1). The project
proponent on 17.06.2016 submitted online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan
under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project
proponent has submitted copy NOC from Forest Department. The SEAC has appraised this project
under category 1(a) as category B-1 project as per the prevalent procedure at that time. No other
mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been appraised as per
proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public hearing.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1 (now B2 as per amended Notification)
2. Location of Project Village- Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’ in Tehsil - Narnaul, District Mahendergarh Haryana over an area of
11.26 Ha.
3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Stone along with Associated Minerals
“Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’”, over an area of 11.26 Ha
Khasra no.69,70,71,72,80 min and 81 min
Production capacity 20, 00, 000 TPA, daily 30 nos. of dumper @ 25 MT
capacity
4. Project Cost 10 Crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 55 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 40 KLD
Plantation 12 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 25 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 25 Lakh
31
8. Production (Year wise)
Year Bench mrl Production
First 348 to 337 (part) 19.99 Lakh Ton
Second 337 (part) to 331 19.99 Lakh Ton
Third 325 to 319 20.01 Lakh Ton
Fourth 313 to 307 20.01 Lakh Ton
Fifth 310 to 295 20.02 Lakh Ton
9. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 200 Trees
II Yr. 200 Trees
III Yr. 200 Trees
IV Yr. 200 Trees
V Yr. 200 Trees
10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,
Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,
Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,
Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 1500 Ltr/day.
The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent in the proposed crushing plan has proposed to provide
sprinkling water system or putting ceil on the “Transfer Points” to arrest the
fugitive particles is not proper/justified. The project proponent is required to install
APCM i.e. Dust Suppression/Dust Extraction Systems. The project proponent is
required to submit the same [4] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions as category B-2 in
view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 subject to satisfactory reply to the below
mentioned observation within 15 days.
32
Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for River Bed Mining of Sand minor mineral “Mandoli Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-4” at Village
Mandoli, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar over an area of 25.56 Ha by M/S JSM Foods Pvt. Ltd
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s JSM
Foods Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, Village Mandoli,
Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-4, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar over an area of 25.56 Ha
by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 07
years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated
19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 25.56 Ha having Village-Mandoli
Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-4. The project proponent on 17.06.2016 uploaded online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained. The EAC, MoEF on 18.09.2015 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public
hearing was held on 26.04.2016. The study period is 1st
October to 31st
December 2015.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project Village Mandoli, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar
3. Project Details Khasra No. River Bed Mining of Sand minor mineral at over an
area of 25.56 Ha
“Mandoli Ghaggar West 53//5,6,15,16/1,16/2,25
Block/YNR B-4” 54//1 to 25
55//1,2,9,10,11,20
57//1 to 4, 7 to 13
58//5,6,15
Production capacity 11, 91, 000 TPA @ 159 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 1.5 crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 18.77 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 13 KLD
Plantation 3 KLD
Drinking 2.77 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 11.80 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 7.5 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 11, 91, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be
3 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 268
armsl to 272 armsl.
33
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area Block Latitude Longitude
“Mandoli 30°08'12"N 77°25 '01"E
Ghaggar West 30°08'28"N 77°25 '21"E
Block/YNR B-
4”
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 800 Trees
II Yr. 800 Trees
III Yr. 800 Trees
IV Yr. 800 Trees
V Yr. 800 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days. Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for River Bed Mining of minor mineral
“Mandoli Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-3” at Village Mandoli, Tehsil
& District Yamunanagar over an area of 20.18 Ha by M/S JSM
Foods Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s JSM
Foods Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, Village Mandoli
Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-3, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar over an area of 20.18 Ha
by imposing stipulations stated therein.
34
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was
noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 10 years subject to
the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been
granted for an area of 20.18 Ha having Village-Mandoli Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-3. The project
proponent on 17.06.2016 uploaded online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan
under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from
Forest Department has been obtained. The EAC, MoEF on 18.09.2015 approved the TOR for EIA
study. The public hearing was held on 12.05.2016. The study period is 1st
October to 31st
December
2015. The SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1 as per the procedure prevalent at that
time. No other mine lease area is located within 500 meter.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in 1 (a) B-1
schedule):
2. Location of Project Village Mandoli Ghagga, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar
3. Project Details Khasra No. River Bed Mining of Sand minor mineral at over an area
of 20.18 Ha
“Mandoli Ghaggar West 52//2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,23,24,25
Block/YNR B-3” 53//1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24
58//1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,18,19,20
59//3,4,5,6,7,8,13,14,15,16,17,18
Production capacity 8, 50, 000 TPA @ 113 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 1.2 crores
5. Water Requirement & 52.82 KLD through Tankers
Source Dust suppression 6.82 KLD
Plantation 4 KLD
Drinking 5 KLD
6. Environment Management 11.80 lakh
Plan
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 7.5 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 8, 50, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be 3 meter.
The alivation range of mine site is 269 armsl to 273
armsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the
lease area Block Latitude Longitude
“Mandoli 30°08'10"N 77°24 '41"E
Ghaggar West 30°08'28"N 77°25 '01"E
Block/YNR B-
3”
35
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 800 Trees
II Yr. 800 Trees
III Yr. 800 Trees
IV Yr. 800 Trees
V Yr. 800 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions as Category B-1 in view of the amended Notification subject to
satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15 days. Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand
Minor Mineral Mines of “Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5” at Village
Kanalsi, Tehsil Jagadhri over an area of 44.14 Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar by M/s P.S.Buildtech.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
P.S.Buildtech for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at “Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5” in Tehsil Jagadhri , District-Yamuna Nagar over an area of 44.14 Ha.
by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It
was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 09 years
subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 30.11.2015. The
lease has been granted for an area of 44.14 Ha having Village- Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5. The
project proponent on 23.06.2016 uploaded online application along with copy of approved
Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of
36
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.
The EAC, MoEF on 08.02.2016 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public hearing was held on
23.05.2016. The study period is December 2015 to February 2016.
Brief details of the project:
1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
2. Location of Project “Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5” in Tehsil Jagadhri , District-Yamuna Nagar
3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral over an area of 44.14 Ha.
Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5 41//16,24,25
42//16 to 19,20,21,22 to 25
43//16,17 to 24,25
44//1,10,11,12,19,20,21,22
45//1,2,3 to 8,9,10 to11,12,13 to 18,19,20 to
21,22,23 to 24,25/1,25/2
46//1 to 21,24,25
47//3,to 7,7/1,7/2,8,9 min,11min,12 to 25
48//16 min,24 min, 25
52//4 min,5,6,7,15
53//1,2,3,4/1,4/2,5,7,8 to 13, 19
Production capacity 19, 50, 000 TPA @ 260 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 5.00 crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 40 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 20 KLD
Plantation 14 KLD
Drinking 6 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 25.10 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 17.25 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 19, 50, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be
3 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 267
amsl to 276 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area Block Latitude Longitude
Kanalsi 30°08'09"N 77°24 '00"E
Block/YNR B- 30°08'31"N 77°24 '46"E
5
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light
Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
37
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days. Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for mining of (Boulder, Gravel & Sand) at
Yamunanagar-Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1 located at Bailgarh Village, Chhachhrauli, Tehsil-Yamunanagar with production capacity of 2.14 Million TPA (ROM) in lease area of 44.0 hac by M/s Celleis Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Celleis
Realtech Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Village-
Yamunanagar-Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1, Tehsil-Yamunanagar over an area of 44.0
Ha. by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.
It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 07
years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated
19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 44.0 Ha having Village-Yamunanagar-
Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1. The project proponent on 04.01.2016 uploaded online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been
obtained. The EAC, MoEF on 24.09.2015 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public
hearing was held on 26.04.2016. The study period is October to December 2015. Brief details of the project: 1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1
38
2. Location of Project Yamunanagar-Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1,
Tehsil-Yamunanagar
3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral over an area of 44.0 Ha.
Production capacity 21, 40, 000 TPA @ 285 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)
4. Project Cost 30.1 crores
5. Water Requirement & Source 18 KLD through Tankers
Dust suppression 12 KLD
Plantation 3 KLD
Drinking 3 KLD
6. Environment Management Plan 20.01 lakh
Budget
7. CSR Activates Budget 53.5 Lakh
8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 21, 40, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be
3 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 293
amsl to 302 amsl.
9. Corner Coordinates of the lease
area Block Latitude Longitude
Yamunanagar- 30°14'40.7"N 77°30 '56.1"E
Bailgarh North 30°14'37.4"N 77°31 '00.8"E
Block/YNR-1 30°14'27.6"N 77°31 '01.7"E
30°14'12.4"N 77°30 '53.7"E
30°14'04.0"N 77°30 '45.4"E
30°14'03.8"N 77°30 '43.2"E
30°14'06.1"N 77°30 '41.0"E
30°14'14.2"N 77°30 '36.0"E
30°14'21.0"N 77°30 '35.0"E
10. Green belt/ plantation
Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation
I Yr. 1000 Trees
II Yr. 1000 Trees
III Yr. 1000 Trees
IV Yr. 1000 Trees
V Yr. 1000 Trees
11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van
The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,
its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent
Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease
area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order
to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:
39
(i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of
particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling
system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15
days. Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance proposed Commercial Warehousing Project at village-
Kishrora, Sonepat, Haryanaby M/S Agson Global Pvt. Ltd.
The representation received from M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd requesting SEIAA
to consider their request for deemed clearance on the basis of NGT order passed in this case
enclosed with representation and details given in the office note was taken up for consideration
in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the applicant has contended that their Project Proposal
qualifies for deemed clearance as per the provision prescribed in para8 (iii) of EIA notification
14.09.2006 as no decision was communicated to the Project Proponent within 45 days of
recommendation of SEAC. The opinion of ADA of the Department of Environment was also
obtained.
After detailed deliberation it was decided to call the authorized
representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next meeting to justify
their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.
Additional Agenda Items:
Permission of Chair was obtained to take up the cases deferred in the last meeting
to consider their replies.
Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony “Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
This case was deferred for want of more information in the 94th
meeting of SEIAA
held on 11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the
observations raised by SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed that the report sought from Sh.
Hitender Singh, Arch. is still awaited. Accordingly, the case was deferred for want of report
from Sh. Hitender Singh, Arch. Member, SEAC.
40
Item No.[28] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of “Group Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana by M/s Dream Merchant Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
This case was deferred for want of more information in the 94th
meeting of SEIAA held
on 11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations
raised by SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent shall submit copy of EDC. [2] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking to increase the irrigation
efficiency from 75% to 80%.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. Item No.[29] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at
village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd.
This case was deferred for want of more information in the 94th
meeting of SEIAA held
on 11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations
raised by SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The information provided for point no. 8.3 and 9.1 is again incomplete. The
project proponent is required to resubmit the complete information in respect of
the same. [2] The project proponent has proposed to supply treated water to the nearby sites for their
construction and also proposed to discharge the excess of treated water in the HUDA
sewer line. The proponent is required to submit clear cut proposal. If the proposal is to
supply excess of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction then the project
proponent is required to submit MOU/Agreement with the site owners or the project
proponent shall submit copy of IDC paid up to date, location of HUDA sewer line on the
plan and its carrying capacity.
In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised observation within 15 days period to all the members of SEIAA. Item No.[30] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex “Orris Market
City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
This case was deferred for want of more information in the 94th
meeting of SEIAA held on
11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations raised by
SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up
41
for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that the site
visit report submitted by sub-committee indicated that the project proponent has not
started construction of the existing project at site. It was observed that the project
proponent has proposed irrigation efficiency is up to 75%. A decision was taken that the
project proponent shall submit an undertaking to increase the irrigation efficiency from
75% to 80%.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observation
within 15 days.
*******
1
Minutes of the 96th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on. 22nd September, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.
The following attended the meeting of Authority:
1. Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA
2. Dr. Punit Ghai, Member SEIAA At the outset it was noticed that M.S.SEIAA did not attend the meeting. However
it was decided to take up the cases recommended by SEAC for Environmental Clearance
or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No. 804-806 dated
19.09.2016. Following decisions were taken:- Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex
project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016.
It was observed that M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd. has sold the land of commercial
area under consideration for environmental clearance to M/s JMS Buildtech Ptv. Ltd. and
M/s JMS Buildtech pvt. Ltd. has approached SEAC and submitted fresh application in
the name of JMS Buildtech for appraisal by SEAC during the 137th meeting of SEAC.
The SEAC giving reference of Town & Country Planning Department letter no.
MISC.2213/SD(BS)/2015/1142 dated 20.01.2015 has informed that the Town & Country
Planning Department allows approval of building plans in cases where even license is not
valid, but third or fourth party rights have been created and in this case also the third
party rights have been created. The SEAC referred this case to SEIAA for taking a
decision to the effect whether environment clearance can be considered in such cases in
the absence of valid license. The above observations of SEAC were taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed that:
1. The Town & Country Planning letter reference of which is given in the
proceedings has got no relevancy in the present case. In either case whether M/s
Ramprasta Estate or M/s JMS Buildtech the valid license is required for
consideration of the project proposal. However in the present case if the project
proponent/licensee is able to submit proof of having submitted the application for
validity of license along with all the supporting documents i.e. license fee,
EDC/IDC etc. the application for environment clearance can be considered
provided the project proponent submits an undertaking for submission of valid
license before the start of construction.
2
2. The licensee M/s Ramprasta Estate is responsible to provide internal infrastructure
i.e. services lines and road within the zoned area as EDC/IDC are being paid to the
concerned quarter by M/s Ramprasta Estate. Therefore in the present case the
services lines in the commercial belt proposed to be developed by M/s JMS
Buildtech shall also be laid by M/s Ramprasta Estate. The Ramsprasta Estate
cannot provide all these internal services without obtaining prior environmental
clearance as the project area is more than 50 hac.
3. M/s JMS Buildtech shall clearly explain that the commercial project is
independent entity having independent system of the disposal of treated waste
water, laying of dual plumbing lines and sewer line and the services lines are not
integrated with the plotted colony. The project proponent shall also submit
assurance of treated water supply for construction, fresh water supply for drinking
purpose and disposal of sewer in the public drain in the name of JMS Buildtech.
In view of the above it was decided to refer this case to SEAC with the advice to
consider the proposal in the light of above observations of SEIAA.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony at
Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s JMK Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has not suggested environmental safe guards for the safety /
protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of ground
water table at 4 meter in his reply. The SEAC has also not reported the same in the
recommendation. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [2] The project proponent has not given the detail of breakup of water requirement for
construction. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [3] The project proponent is required to give the specifications/dimensions of the area
reserved for setting up of STP and OWC as the same has not been given in the
reply. [4] The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof/MOU for supply of 399
KLD of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction. [5] The water requirement for horticulture @ 9 lt./sqm is on the higher side. The
project proponent is required to revise the same and also to submit revised water
balance diagram. The Project Proponent vide letter dated 06.09.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting .It was observed that the project proponent has
suggested in detail the environmental safeguards for the safety and protection of proposed
3
building considering depth of ground water table at 4mt., breakup of water requirement
for construction has been given. The Project Proponent has given
specifications/dimensions of area reserve for STP/OWC, copies of EDC and revised
water balance diagram.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the following
conditions in addition to usual condition in practice.
[1] The project proponent shall ensure that the plinth level of the building block to be
1.5 meter above 100 years flood level of the said Najafgarh Jheel.
[2] The project proponent shall obtain NOC from HUDA as well as Irrigation
Department before the start of construction, regarding possible adverse effect of
project proposal on the said Najafgarh Jheel.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016
and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The information provided for point no. 8.3 and 9.1 is again incomplete. The
project proponent is required to resubmit the complete information in respect of
the same. [2] The project proponent has proposed to supply treated water to the nearby sites for
their construction and also proposed to discharge the excess of treated water in the
HUDA sewer line. The proponent is required to submit clear cut proposal. If the
proposal is to supply excess of treated water to the nearby sites for their
construction then the project proponent is required to submit MOU/Agreement
with the site owners or the project proponent shall submit copy of IDC paid up to
date, location of HUDA sewer line on the plan and its carrying capacity.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 03.09.2016 submitted the reply which was
discussed in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the Project Proponent has now given
complete information in respect of point no. 8.3 and 9.1 of Form 1 and copies of IDC
paid up to date to the concerned Department.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition
in practice.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony on an
area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village Mewka, Sector-92,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd. The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction of commercial colony on an area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village
4
Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of
documents to the members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not
possible for the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the
next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of
documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the
members of Authority.
Item No.[5] Extension of validity period and amendment of EC for const. of Commercial complex cum hotel at village-Hyderpur viran wazirabad,sec-53,Gurgaon by M/S Monika Infrastructure Pvt. Limited.
The SEAC has recommended to grant environment clearance to the project by
imposing stipulations therein. The case was taken up for discussion in the today’s
meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted application for
extension of validity of environment clearance granted to their project by MOEF GOI on
30.10.2007 which was valid up to 29.10.2012. The project proponent has achieved
construction 46901.36 sqmt against total proposed built up area of 49345.39 sqmt.
It was noticed that the Project Proponent could not construct the area as proposed;
the remaining unconstructed area could not be further developed as the Environmental
Clearance expired on 29.10.2012. However the project proponent submitted fresh
application seeking environment clearance for remaining unconstructed area. The sub-
committee of SEAC also visited the site and reported that the project proponent did not
carry out construction after the expiry of validity of EC but failed to report whether all
the environment conditions/environmental safeguard during construction period of
already constructed project were complied with by the project proponent or not? In view of the above it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the Sh.
Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection
to check the compliance of conditions/environmental safeguard (construction phase) of
already granted environment clearance letter and shall submit the report within 15 days
period.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15
acres in the revenue estate of Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction of Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15 acres in the revenue estate of
Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies
of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not
possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the
5
next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of
documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the
members of Authority.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari, Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction of expansion of Group Housing Colony located at Village-Sahbajpur
Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies
of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not
possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the
next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of
documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the
members of Authority.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony Project located at Village-Naurangpur, Sector-80, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s R.P.Estates Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 88th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.02.2016
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations:
[i] The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of
bio-degradable waste not discussed. The space allocated in the project for
management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan. [ii] The height of the proposed building 93.45 Meter. The Structural stability
certificate not obtained. [iii] The License is valid up to 07.12.2015. The project proponent is required to submit
validated license. The Project Proponent vide letter dated 09.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
appraised by SEAC in the 140th meeting held on 09.09.2016 and again recommended the
project for environment clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the usual conditions in practice.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP Project at Village
Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana by Public
Health Engineering Division, Kurukshetra,
The project proponent submitted application on 26.02.2015 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated in the subject. The proposal was
6
transferred to MoEF & CC, GoI on 27.03.2015. No action was taken and the case was
returned to SEIAA on 31.08.2015 after its constitution. The SEAC in its 140th meeting
held on 09.09.2016 and referred to SEIAA to seek clarification whether this project is
covered under Category 7(h) i.e. CETP or STP.
The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed
that: i. The project proponent has conducted EIA study and submitted the analysis reports
issued by HSPCB and other NABL approved labs. In view of the above it was decided that the SEAC should appraise and
recommend the case on the basis of analysis reports of HSPCB lab and/or any other
NABL accredited lab submitted by the project proponent.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex
“Corona Optus” located at revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Corona Housing Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction of expansion of Group Housing Complex “Corona Optus” located at
revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex was taken
up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has
failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence
of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly,
the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to
supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended
their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony (14.30 Acres) at Village-Harsaru and Hayatpur, Sector-89 A, Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.
This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015
and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following
observations.
[i] Since the height of building is 64.60 meter hence clearance from the recognize
institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering College/National Institute of
Technology etc regarding structural stability and for fire safety clearance from
institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The project proponent shall obtain
the same and submit to the SEAC.
[ii] The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking
calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project
proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for
treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan
7
showing area ear marked for composting. [iii] As per point no. 31(vi) of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an
undertaking stating that: “Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of
building is more than 60 meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high
rise building shall also be made”. [iv] The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper
stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The
project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site. [v] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for
composting.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 16.08.2016 submitted the reply which was
appraised by SEAC in the 140th meeting held on 09.09.2016 and again recommended for
environment clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in
the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions in
practice.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Warehousing Project at village- Kishrora, Sonepat, Haryana by M/S Agson Global Pvt. Ltd
The representation received from M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd requesting
SEIAA to consider their request for deemed clearance on the basis of NGT order passed
in this case enclosed with representation and details given in the office note was taken up
for consideration in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 wherein it was
decided to call the representative of the project proponent in the next meeting for
providing facts of the case with proper justification.
In the today’s meeting the representative of the project proponent appeared
before the Authority and presented the copies of the orders passed by NGT in the matter.
The representative of the Project Proponent informed that there case was recommended
for environmental clearance by SEAC in its 72nd meeting held on 27.12.2012 but no
decision was conveyed to the project proponent within 45 days.
In view of the above discussions the Authority agreed to review its decision
taken in 53rd meeting held on 15.06.2013 and decided that the project proposal qualifies
for deemed clearance after the expiry of 45 days of recommendation of SEAC dated
08.01.2013 for granting environment clearance to the project; in view of para no. 8 (iii
and iv) of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and also decided that the project proponent
shall comply with the conditions as stated therein in the recommendation of SEAC of
72nd meeting held on 27.12.2012.
8
Additional Agenda Items:
Permission of Chair was obtained to take up the cases deferred in the last meeting
to consider their replies. Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
at Village Khanpur and Kawarsika, Sector-17, Sohna, Tehsil Nuh,
Mewat, Haryana by M/s Goldsouk Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016.
It was decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report of the
observation of SEIAA within 15 days period. The sub-committee on 22.09.2016
submitted its report and reported that no construction at the site has been carried out by
the project proponent. The reply to the observations of the Authority was also discussed
in detail. It was noticed that the project proponent has given the existing AAQ of project
area, detailed calculations of drinking water for construction workers and its source and
impact on AAQ due to movement of water tankers and mitigation measures suggested for
the same. In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition
in practice. Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical
University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.
These cases was lastly considered in the 94th meeting of SEIAA held on
11.08.2016 and defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked
to submit MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency within 15
days. The Project Proponent vide letter dated 20.02.2016 submitted the reply to the
observations raised by SEIAA which was not found in order. The Authority was of the
view that M/s S.D. Bio-Medical Waste Management Company has neither obtained
environment clearance under EIA Notification nor applied for environment clearance.
Accordingly, it was decided to defer this case with the advice to the project proponent to
submit MOU with the Bio-Medical Waste Service provider authorized by HSPCB and
having valid environment clearance.
*********
1
Minutes of the 97th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 7th October, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS
(Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana,
Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification
dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 880-882 dated 06.10.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] EC for “Ware House” at Village-Lowa Khurd, Dist-Jhajjar, Haryana
by M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to grant Environmental Clearance to the project
was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and the case was
deferred with the following observations:
[1] The CLU has been granted for setting up of Warehouse on 01.09.2012. The
existing built up area is 15402.3 sqmt and proposed built up area is 18780 sqmt
(total 34182.9 sqmt). It is a case of expansion and not new as indicated in Form-I.
The project proponent is required to rectify Form-I.
[2] The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is
operational and complete and construction was started after getting the approval
for building plan of 15402 sqmt and the construction has been carried out in
accordance with the approved plans.
[3] It has been proposed to use 4 KLD treated water for curing for expansion of
project but for how much period/days this demand will persist was not clear as
the water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The project proponent is
required to submit the exact time period during which 4 KLD of treated water
will be required for curing of concrete for construction of expansion and shall
submit revised water calculation.
[4] The water requirement for miscellaneous use in the existing area is shown as 1
KLD whereas use of 5 KLD has been shown after expansion. The project
proponent is required to justify the same as how the water requirement for
miscellaneous use has increased from 1 KLD to 5 KLD.
[5] The project proponent shall submit green belt development plan of existing unit
covering 4594.515 sqm and on 4795.635 sqm proposed under expansion i.e. total
9387.15 sqm.
[6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the SEIAA
within 15 days on the following points:
2
(i) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using
treated water.
(ii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(iii) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(iv) Observations raised by SEIAA 1 to 5 above.
The project proponent on 12.09.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has
submitted revised Form-I, Consent to Operate and occupancy certificate, details of use of
4 KLD of treated water for curing and green belt development plan of the existing unit.
It was observed by the Authority that the site visit report submitted by sub-committee
indicated that the project proponent has not started construction at site, except old
boundary wall along with the wire fencing, on the date of inspection.
In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice for Ware House Project.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony on
an area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village Mewka, Sector-92,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to this project
by imposing stipulations stated therein was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.1, 8.3, 9.1, 9.5 and 9.6 of Form-
1A not properly explained.
[2] The project proponent is required to explain and ensure the use of CNG and pool
vehicles (page no. 51 of presentation).
[3] Frequency of AAQ monitoring during Operation Phase not given.
[4] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all the
seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture and road
washing as per prescribed norms.
[5] The project proponent should give exact number of labours to be deployed as
different figures have been given in Form-1.
[6] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of DG/HVAC
system must passed through ‘Cooling Tower ‘ . The location of the same is
not shown on the plan.
3
(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling system.
The entire quantity (22 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity of
treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be
mentioned.
[7] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel requirement,
source of procurement, storage and suggested safety measures.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[3] Extension of validity period and amendment of EC for const. of
Commercial complex cum hotel at village-Hyderpur viran
waazirabad,sec-53,Gurgaon by M/S Monika Infrastructure Pvt.
Limited.
The recommendation of SEAC to grant Environmental Clearance to the project
was lastly considered in the 96th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.09.2016 and the case was
deferred with the decision that the Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members
SEAC shall visit the site for inspection to check the compliance of
conditions/environmental safeguard (construction phase) of already granted environment
clearance letter and shall submit the report within 15 days period.
The sub-committee on 05.10.2016 submitted the site visit report regarding
compliance of conditions of already granted EC. The sub-committee reported that the
project proponent has given satisfactory report regarding compliance of the
environmental conditions during the construction phase
In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15
acres in the revenue estate of Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was
observed by the Authority that:
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.3, 9.1, and 9.7 of Form-1A not
properly explained.
[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all the
seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture and road
washing as per prescribed norms.
4
[3] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of DG/HVAC
system must passed through ‘Cooling Tower ‘ . The location of the same is
not shown on the plan.
(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling system.
The entire quantity (20 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity of
treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be
mentioned.
[4] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel requirement,
source of procurement, storage and suggested safety measures.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari,
Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was
observed by the Authority that:
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 5.3, 5.4 and 8.1 of Form-1A not
properly explained.
[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all the
seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture and road
washing as per prescribed norms.
[3] The project proponent should give exact number of labours to be deployed as
the same has not in given in Form-1.
[4] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of DG/HVAC
system must passed through ‘Cooling Tower ‘ . The location of the same is
not shown on the plan.
(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling system.
The entire quantity (20 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity of
treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be
mentioned.
[5] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel requirement,
source of procurement, storage and suggested safety measures.
[6] The project proponent is required to submit exact green belt area of existing and
proposed for expansion as different figures of green belt area has been given.
5
[7] The project proponent is required to give the stack height ensuring that the same
should be at least 6 meter above the roof level of highest building.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[6] ] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex
“Corona Optus” located at revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C,
Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Corona Housing Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was
observed by the Authority that:
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 5.4, 8.1, 8.3 and 9.1 of Form- 1A not
properly explained.
[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all the
seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture and road
washing as per prescribed norms.
[3] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel requirement,
source of procurement, storage and suggested safety measures.
[4] The project proponent should clarify the technology/system to be adopted for DG
cooling as water cooling system and Radiator cooling system (page no. 19) has
been proposed in different chapters.
[5] The project proponent required to give the exact units of power backup as
different figures have been given in the documents (page 20 & 25).
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony at
Sector-114, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s KST Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA in its 94th meeting held on 11.08.2016 decided to refer this case to
SEAC for appraisal and recommendation on merit as per procedure prescribed in the
Notification and time to time guidelines issued by MOEF & CC, GOI on the basis of
report of the sub-committee reporting that a temporary structure of 209 sqmt has been
raised by the project proponent after seeking the approval of STP Gurgaon and this
structure is not the part of actual building plan. The temporary shed on the right side of
corner where a liquor vend is operational is not the part of the project. Some portion of
the site was found excavated but no sign of any work in foundation was noticed and no
6
material was stored at the site. The sub-committee reported that some portion of site was
excavated but safely construed that there is no violation.
The SEAC in its 141st meeting held on 27.09.2016 considered the matter as
referred by SEIAA and has again recommended this case for prosecution as the project
proponent has violated the EIA notification by carrying out excavation and construction
of RCC Pucca structure as indicated in both the site inspection reports.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up in the today’s meeting for
consideration. After detailed deliberations it was decided to refer back the case to SEAC
with the advice to appraise this case on merit and send its recommendations to the
SEIAA within stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for proposed Multilevel car parking project
at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Interntional Infrabuild Pvt.
Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction Multilevel car parking project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up
for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has
failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence
of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly,
the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to
supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended
their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group
Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction of “Affordable Group Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C,
Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed
that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of
Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to
consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice
to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which
the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
7
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet”
project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the
construction of “Motel with Banquet” project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil
& District Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It
was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the
members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the
Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting
with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the
basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project
at Sector-89, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Fidato Buildcon Pvt. Ltd,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance subject to
compliance of conditions stated therein. The project proponent has proposed the
construction of Group Housing Project at Sector-89, Faridabad, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 47372.43 sqm (11.705 acre)
2. Built up area 117384.89 sqmt
3. License Valid up to 01.07.2018
4. Nos. of Towers 9 towers, GF+ Max.14 Floors
5. No. of Units 916 DU
6. Height 42 Meter
7. Green belt 30.38%
8. Water requirement 693 KLD
9. Fresh Water 330 KLD
10. Waste Water 403 KLD
11. STP Capacity 630 KLD
12 Power Requirement 4150 KVA DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 2342kg/day (OWC 1177 kg/day)
14. ECS 1437 ECS
15. RWH 16 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel requirement,
source of procurement, storage and suggested safety measures.
[2] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing location of cooling tower.
8
[3] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all the
seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture and road
washing as per prescribed norms.
[4] The project proponent is required to give the exact stack height ensuring that the
same should be at least 6 meter above the roof level of highest building.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions
subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP Project at Village
Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana by
Public Health Engineering Division, Kurukshetra,
The matter was lastly taken up for consideration in the 96th meeting of SEIAA
held on 22.08.2016 for giving clarification to the SEAC whether this project is covered
under Category 7(h) i.e. CETP or STP. It was decided that the SEAC should appraise and
recommend the case on the basis of analysis reports of HSPCB lab and/or any other
NABL accredited lab submitted by the project proponent.
The SEAC in its 141st meeting held on 27.09.2016 apprised the EIA study report
submitted by project proponent and observed that as per analysis reports there is no
mixing of Industrial effluent and recommended this case for granting Environmental
Clearance by imposing conditions stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to accept the recommendation
of SEAC to grant environmental clearance to the project by imposing the conditions as
recommended by SEAC.
Item No.[13] EC for proposed expansion of our IT/ITES Project, at plot no. 20,
Panchkula Technology Park, Sector-22, Panchkula, Haryana by M/s
JSK Multi Projects Pvt.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord Environmental Clearance the case was
lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and the case was
deferred with the following observations:
[1] The information related to sr. no. 21 of Form-I not clear. The project proponent
has not given the nearest location of Wild Life Sanctuary. The project proponent
is required to submit the same.
[2] The information of point no. 8.3 and 9.1 of Form IA not properly replied. The
project proponent required to submit the revised proper details.
9
[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 6.1 Lt/sqmt of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side considering surface green area and terrace
green area. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for
horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.
[4] It was noticed that the project proponent has already constructed 17370.03 sqm of
building. The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is
operational and complete and construction was started after getting the approval
for building plan of 17370.03 sqm and the construction has been carried out in
accordance with the approved plans.
[5] The project proponent is required to submit compliances of the conditions of CTE
and CTO obtained from HSPCB.
[6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC s
hall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using
treated water.
(ii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(iii) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(iv) Reply to the observation raised at point [1 to 5] above.
The sub-committee on 22.09.2016 visited the site and submitted the report along
with the copy of reply submitted by the project proponent on the observations raised by
SEIAA. The sub-committee report and reply was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted revised Form-I,
Water balance diagram etc. It was observed by the Authority that as per site visit report
submitted by sub-committee the project proponent has not started construction of
expansion project at site.
In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions
in practice for Ware House Project.
*****
1
Minutes of the 98th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 05thDecember, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS
(Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana,
Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification
dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 967-969 dated 30.11.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1]Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical
University” located at Village NunaMajra, District Jhajjar, Haryana
by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.
This case was considered in the 96th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.09.2016 and
the case was deferred with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit
MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency. The project proponent on 28.10.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the Bio-Medical Waste
Management Agency contracted by project proponent has only applied for Environment
Clearance. As per the Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility Guidelines issued
by Central Pollution Control Board on dated 12.07.2016 at para no. 5.2 is clearly
mentioned that the CBWTF operator is also required to obtain “Environmental Clearance
(EC)” from the respective SEIAA or Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change
(MoEF & CC). Until or unless EC is not obtained by the Bio-Medical Waste
Management Agency, the same cannot transport/dispose the Bio-medical/Hazardous
Waste.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with
decision that project proponent should either submit the MOU agency which has EC or
shall have in-house facility as per para 5.2 of CPCB Guidelines.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex
at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Deepanshu
Projects Pvt. Ltd.
This case was considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and
the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] Different figures of built up area has been given in Form I and presentation copy.
The project proponent is required to clarify the exact proposed built up area of
existing project, proposed under expansion and total built up area after expansion.
2
[2] The project proponent is required to give proper information of point no, 8.3 of
Form IA.
[3] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the
seasons.
[4] The use of 24.3 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is not justifiable. The
water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of
water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily to the
extent it is evaporation. The project proponent is required to properly calculate the
water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the
revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water
balance diagram.
[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 90 KLD of treated water for
landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water
requirement for horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.
[6] It has been proposed to discharge 208 KLD of treated water to public
sewer/tankers. The project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid
up to date, carrying capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan.
[7] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 07.09.2016 and the sub-committee
on 07.09.2016 submitted the site visit report. In view of the report submitted, the
Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment
Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions in practice.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari,
Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
This case was considered in the 97th meeting of SEIAA held on 07.10.2016 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 07.11.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting and it was further found that the reply submitted are
incomplete and the Authority decided defer the case with the following observations.
[1] The project proponent shall submit water balance diagram, Annex.2 Fig 2(a), 260
KLD of treated water may be required initially and 14 KLD from Cooling tower
would remain in circuit, hence 246 KLD would be required next time.
[2] 500KVA DG air cooled may be installed to conserve water.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the location of the “Cooling Tower” on plan.
Observation 4 is regarding location of cooling tower of DG sets not for DG sets.
3
[4] Water getting evaporated is 3KLD from cooling of DG sets but diesel required is
just 1000lts/day, both are dependent on running hours of DG sets, may be
mismatch explained.
[5] Safety measures taken for the transportation &storage of Diesel, be discussed.
Quantity given may be revised.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for proposed Multilevel car parking project
at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s International Infrabuild Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Multilevel car parking
project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 7769.95sqm. (1.92 Acres)
2. Built up area 32122.98 sqm
3. Nos. of Floors 2 Basements + GF + 4 Floors
4. Nos. of DU General 1032, EWS 183 , Service personal
108
5. Height 28.3 Meter
6. Green belt 21.5%
7. Water requirement 120 KLD
8. Fresh Water 73 KLD
9. Waste Water 104 KLD
10. STP Capacity 125 KLD
11. Power Requirement 1397 KW DHBVN
12 Solid Waste 136 kg/day (OWC proposed for 68 kg/day)
13. Parking 995 ECS
14. RWH 4 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing
the usual conditions in practice.
4
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group
Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed of “Affordable Group
Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 20,234.25 sqm (5.0 acre)
2. Built up area 50910.454 sqmt
3. License Valid up to 08.10.2020
4. Nos. of Plots 6 towers, GF+ 10 Floors, Anganwadi cum
Crech, Commercial & Community Hall
5. Nos. of DU 724 units
6. Height 32.35 Meter
7. Green belt 20.57%
8. Water requirement 525 KLD
9. Fresh Water 330 KLD
10. Waste Water 430 KLD
11. STP Capacity 520 KLD
12 Power Requirement 2780 KVADHBVN
13. Solid Waste 1682 kg/day (OWC 1177 kg/day)
14. ECS 1093 ECS
15. RWH 05 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Capacity of DG sets not matching p.g no.36 v/s 42
[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution
which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction
phase
[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing reference of
MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be
incorporated ( Table 2.4)
[4] Shown 198 KLD of treated water to be discharged in sewer, location & carrying
capacity of Sewer.
[5] Incorporating the above written observations, the project proponent is required to
submit the water balance diagram for all the seasons.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
5
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet”
project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,
green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of
Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Pg. no. 33, per capita demand of water for guest rooms & villas is 320lts & 200lts
per day, on what basis PP has arrived on this quantity, explain
[2] Asking for 15 lts/meal/person extra, on what basis
[3] Asking for 26.13 KLD of fresh water taking 2600 persons for banquet hall/ spa
etc. etc., how did PP arrive on such a high fig.
[4] 40,000Lts/day fresh water for Laundry purposes, explain.
[5] 10KLD fresh water for swimming pool, to replenish or replace? Area & location
of pool on layout to be shown.
[6] 10KLD of fresh water for Filter Backwash, why treated water cannot be used for
Backwash &means of disposal water being used in Filter Backwash , explain.
[7] Location, size & capacity of HVAC cooling tower, needing 151,000lts per day for
replenishment, explain.
[8] Pg.no. 35, Measures to be undertaken to reduce water demand during construction
phase, while part OC has been provided, showing some % of construction is
complete still needing 50,000lts water per day for construction, explain.
[9] Pg.no.43; Location of OWC & composting pit on Lay-out to be shown.
[10] Pg. no. 42: Solid waste generation for hotel rooms is 1.0Kg/person/day & for fixed
population 0.1Kg/person/day, why this anomaly, explain.
[11] Pg. no. 54, diesel consumption 700lts/hr., DG sets meant for stand-by operations,
even if have to run for 4hrs a day need 2800lts diesel per day; storage facility &
the safety measures undertaken.
[12] The water consumption quantity seems to be very much on higher side, PP is
asked to re-submit the water balance diagram for all the three seasons and
accordingly be intimated to CGWB.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
6
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing colony at
village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “expansion of Group
Housing colony at village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 70541.654 sqm. (17.43 Acres)
2. Built up area Existing 140314.966 sqm
Expansion 29597.345 sqm
Total -169912.215 sqm
3. License Valid up to 13.08.2019
4. Nos. of floors &
Blocks
Existing -14 blocks, Basement + GF +14
Floors.
Expansion -2 blocks
Total – 16 Blocks
5. Nos. of Service Units 940 DU + 167 EWS +95 Servant units
6. Height 44.5 Meter
7. Green belt 30%
8. Water requirement 960 KLD
9. Fresh Water 544 KLD
10. Waste Water 714 KLD
11. STP Capacity 960 KLD (parcel A-600 KLD & parcel B-
360 KLD)
12 Power Requirement 8956 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 2735 kg/day (2 nos. of OWC proposed for
1915 kg/day)
14. ECS 1692 ECS
15. RWH 17 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license.
[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution
which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction
phase, no separate need of water for Tyre washing this way.
[3] 275 KLD (p.g.no. 28) would be discharged in sewer location & carrying capacity
of sewer.
[4] Fig mis-match p.g no. 28/40 v/s 41 pt.2.13.
7
[5] To conserve water during Curing of Concrete Jute sacks may be used which may
provide moist conditions to the concrete for longer duration by retaining water
[6] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture citing reference of MoEF guidelines,
may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be incorporated ( Table 2.4)
[7] Pt.5.1.2 Water Conservation Measures to be incorporated still 135 lpd per capita
water requirement, explain . A new Water Balance diagram taking care of the
above observations for all the three seasons be submitted.
[8] Plantation plan to be shown on lay-out depicting 1255 no. of trees with a canopy
area of 25 sq. mt.
[9] Pg. no. 268, Area required for storage & management of solid waste 645.66 sq.
mt. location on lay- out plan be shown.
[10] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution.
(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.
(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.
(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of
ground water.
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste.
(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation.
(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project.
(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 9 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.
N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report
on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony at
Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s St.
Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group Housing Colony at
Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryanaas under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 44211.9064 sqm. (10.925 Acres)
2. Built up area 137412.18 sqm
3. License Valid up to 08.08.2019
8
4. Nos. of floors 9 Blocks + 2 Basements + GF + 17 Floors,
Nursery school, Commercial, Community
building
5. Nos. of Service Units 632 DU + 112 EWS
6. Height 58.2 Meter
7. Green belt 26.03%
8. Water requirement 670 KLD
9. Fresh Water 343 KLD
10. Waste Water 455 KLD
11. STP Capacity 540 KLD
12 Power Requirement 6207.5 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 1804 kg/day (2 nos. OWC proposed for
1263 kg/day)
14. ECS 1589 ECS
15. RWH 11 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] 343KLD of fresh water requirement shown & assurance from HUDA obtained for
420KLD.
[2] Instead of “Tyre Washing” provide Water Troughs at entry & exit of project to
conserve water.
[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing reference of
MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be
incorporated ( Table 2.4)
[4] The calculations shown for Water Demand for Cooling Tower citing reference of
MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system not for DG set cooling
tower.
[5] Running of DG sets shown 2hrs a day (pg. no. 56) and water required for cooling
of DG sets is 16KLD that too in all three seasons; a mismatch and illogical.
Secondly, this much quantity of water may not lost in evaporation, major quantity
still be in circuit
[6] Location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan
[7] The Project Proponent submit a new Water Balance Diagram (for all the three
seasons separately) taking above written observations into consideration
[8] Plantation plan with said no. of trees & canopy area 25 sq. mt be submitted
depicting on the green-area reserved for the same
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
9
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing Complex
“PSA (6 Acre)” Basai at Sector-37C, Manesar, Gurgaon by M/s Prime
IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
This case was considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015 and
the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.
1. The project proponent has submitted license no. 64 of 2011 issued by Town and
Country Planning Department for development of group housing colony on an
area of 17 acres.
2. The SEIAA on the same license had already granted environment clearance for
development of 11 acres of licensed area out of total 17 acre of the licensed area to
M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
3. The environmental clearance to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. was
granted on the recommendation of SEAC. The EC letter was issued on
15.04.2014.
4. The AAI clearance submitted by the M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present
project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
5. The approved zoning plan dated 09.03.2012 submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions
Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech
Services Pvt. Ltd.
6. The NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification
submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the
name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
7. The EDC/IDC receipt submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present
project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.
It was observed by the Authority that this case is not fit for consideration as
SEIAA has already granted environmental clearance on the recommendation of the
SEAC to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. and all the vital documents submitted
by the project proponent are in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. to
which EC has already been granted, whereas the application has been submitted by M/s
Prime IT Solution Pvt. Ltd, which is contradictory in terms. It appears that the SEAC has
not considered this fact at all.
The Project Proponent on 07.10.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of
the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 and
SEAC refer back to SEIAA for taking further action.
The case was taken up in today’s meeting; due to lack of
appraisal/recommendations of SEAC, it cannot be discussed further. After detailed
deliberations it was decided to refer back the case to SEAC with the advice to appraise
this case on merit and send its recommendations to the SEIAA within stipulated period as
prescribed in the Notification.
10
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed expansion of Group
Housing Colony “Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana as
under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area Existing - 68063.129 sqm
Expansion -14114.231sqm
Total - 82177.36 sqm. (20.306 Acres)
2. Built up area Existing 161429.438 sqm
Expansion 35706.26 sqm
Total -197135.698 sqm
3. License Valid up to 12.12.2016
4. Nos. of floors &
Blocks
Existing -13 blocks, Basement + GF +14
Floors.
Expansion -3 blocks
Total–16 Blocks +Basement +GF+14 Floors
5. Nos. of Service Units 716 DU + 130 EWS +72 Servant units, 2
Nursery School, 2 Commercial Area.
6. Height 42.7 Meter
7. Green belt 30.73%
8. Water requirement 734 KLD
9. Fresh Water 368 KLD
10. Waste Water 491 KLD
11. STP Capacity 580 KLD
12 Power Requirement 5706 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 1980 kg/day (2 nos. OWC proposed for
1386 kg/day)
14. ECS 1314 ECS
15. RWH 20 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] DG sets – 2x600KVA + (3x750 KVA + 2 x 600 KVA); water should be conserved
by having “Air Cooled” or “Cooling Coil” technology instead of “Cooling Tower”
[2] As such Cooling tower is not required and the calculations shown are based on the
MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system.
[3] Even if required location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan
[4] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution
which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction
phase
11
[5] Quantity of diesel required during construction & operation phase. Storage plan &
safety measures undertaken
[6] Plantation plan (1929 trees), keeping canopy area 25 sq. mt. may be submitted
with the spacing 2mt X 2mt(pg.no.190)
[7] Water utilization calculation citing reference of MoEF guidelines, may the
recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be incorporated ( Table 2.4) .
Incorporating all the above said observations(regarding water conservation), new
water balance diagrams for all the three seasons be submitted and satisfactory
reply to other observations be submitted
[8] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution
(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.
(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.
(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of
ground water
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste
(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation
(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project
(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel
(x) And any other point which visiting team deem suitable
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 7 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.
N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report
on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for the “Revision and Expansion of Group
Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Revision and Expansion
of Group Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111, Gurgaon,
Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area Existing – 79824.12 sqm
Expansion -5235.61 sqm
Total – 85059.73 sqm. (21.018 Acres)
12
2. Built up area Existing – 225379.07 sqm
Expansion – 13085.09 sqm
Total -238379.86 sqm
3. License valid up to 24.07.2018
4. Residential Towers (Tower A to G), Community Building
(Tower H1 & H2), Convenient shopping,
Nursery School and EWS block.
5. Nos. of Dwelling
Units
917 DU
6. Height 87 Meter
7. Green belt 35.22%
8. Water requirement 857 KLD
9. Fresh Water 493 KLD
10. Waste Water 572 KLD
11. STP Capacity 700 KLD (600 KLD + 100 KLD)
12 Power Requirement 8439.9 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 2463.69 kg/day
14. ECS 1668 ECS
15. RWH 23 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] 20 + 3.33 KLD fresh water for make-up on daily basis. Why fresh water is
required for make-up when treated water is available. Secondly, “Air Cooled” or
“Cooling Coil” technology may be applied to conserve water.
[2] DG sets would be running for quite longer duration as inferred from the quantity of
water required for cooling, how much diesel would be consumed per day?
Necessary Safety measures taken for safe transportation & storage of Diesel.
[3] 8+5 KLD Fresh water for Filter Backwash; why not the treated water & secondly,
where the water used for Filter backwash would go.
[4] Water Balance Diagram for all 3 seasons to be submitted
[5] The project proponent shall submit location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan.
[6] Location & carrying capacity of sewer
[7] Proposed no. of trees 4750 & shrubs 12,241, plantation plan be submitted
[8] Pt.8.1 not explained properly
[9] Pt. 8.3; states F/A will be used in road construction; F/A handling system &
APCM system installed may be shown on plan & be well described
[10] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the
SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution
(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.
13
(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.
(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of
ground water
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste
(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation
(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project
(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel
(x) And any other point which visiting team deem suitable
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 9 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.
N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report
on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for Mining of minor minerals “Road Metal
& Masonry Stone” at village Mukundpura, District Mahendergarh,
Haryana by Shri Satish Kumar Garg.
This case was considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015 and
the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.
1. The project proponent has not submitted NOC from the Forest Department. The
project proponent on 29.10.2015 submitted letter issued by Mines and Geology
Department indicating that the mine leased area is not a Forest land. The SEAC
should examine the same.
2. The SEAC in its recommendation has given different figures of production. The
lease period is for remaining three years whereas in the conditions the production
figures have been given of year wise up to 5 years and sum of production for the
next five years.
3. The mine lease has been granted for 20 years w.e.f. 20.07.1999 up to 10.07.2019.
Therefore the mine is in operation and it is not a new project. The SEAC should
ensure that the project proponent has already effectively reclaimed/rejuvenate the
already excavated mine lease area by adopting all the environmental safe-guards.
4. The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they have kept-
amount (figures to be given) for reclamation of excavated mine lease area and
shall also ensure that all the environmental safe-guards shall be adopted for
closure of mine.
The Project Proponent submitted the reply to the observations of the SEIAA,
which was considered by SEAC in the 143rdmeeting held on 27.10.2016 and SEAC again
has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC
was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with
14
the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by
imposing the usual conditions in practice.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for “Recreation and Leisure Project” in
village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S DLF Limited.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 20.07.2012 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Recreation and Leisure
Project” in village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that Shri
S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection
of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the
site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days period.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for “Municipal Solid Waste Management
Facility” at Taraori, Karnal, Haryana by Municipal Committee,
Taraori.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on25.11.2013 submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the “Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility” at
Taraori, Karnal, Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
15
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex
at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s BluejaysRealtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on05.05.2014 submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Complex at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon,
Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for National Cancer Institute, AIIMS,
Jhajjar, Haryana by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS).
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 29.10.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed National Cancer Institute,
AIIMS, Jhajjar, Haryana.The Authority decided that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar
Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the
site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15
days period.
Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for the construction of group housing
project at village- Badshahpur, Sec-66, Gurgaon by M/S Golden Glow
Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
16
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on01.03.2011 submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing project at village- Badshahpur, Sec-66,
Gurgaon.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project-
EDGE Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s S.A. Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on13.07.2012 submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Project EDGE Towers (Phase-II) At
Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Setting up of a Senior
Residential School (Institution) at village Gamdoj, Tehsil Sohna, Dist.
Gurgaon, Haryana by Ms. Bluebells Educational Society.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
amended Notification dated 22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and the Authority
17
decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental
clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI dated
09.06.2015.
Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for expansion of “Jai ParkashMukund Lal
Innovative Engg. & Technology Institute” at
RadourDistt.Yamunanagar, Haryana by JAI ParkashMukand Lal
Innovative Engineering & Technology Institute.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
amended Notification dated 22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and the Authority
decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental
clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI dated
09.06.2015.
Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing
Colony “Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village
Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana M/s Rurban Development
Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on01.08.2013submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing Colony “Rudco Golf
Greens” located at Revenue Estates of Village Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-
residential buildings for Haryana Police at FerozpurNamak Village,
Nuh Taluk Mewat District by Haryana Police Housing Corporation
Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
18
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on27.06.2014submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the Residential & Non-residential buildings for Haryana
Police at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat District.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential and Non-
residential buildings for Haryana Police at Bahraula Village, Palwal
Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing
Corporation Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on 27.06.2014 submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the Residential and Non-residential buildings for Haryana
Police at Bahraula Village, Palwal Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project
located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana by M/s
Navtech Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
19
It was noticed that the project proponent on30.06.2014submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the Warehouse Project located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas,
District-Rewari, Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for construction of “5 Star Hotel” at Village
Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Munjal Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 07.07.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “5 Star Hotel” at Village
Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that
Sh. S. N. Mishra and Mr. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for
inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. S. N. Mishra and Mr. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the
site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15
days period.
Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Five Star Hotel” at
Village Prithla, District Palwal, Haryana by M/s SRS Retreat Services
Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 22.07.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Five Star Hotel” at Village
20
Prithla, District Palwal, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri
Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the
following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit
the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within
15 days period.
Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village
Sohna Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing
Corporation.
The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent on28.07.2014submitted application for
Environmental Clearance for the expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village Sohna Taluk,
Gurgaon, Haryana.
After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC
with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC
should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation
on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.
******
1
Minutes of the 99th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on. 19th January, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. ……….
The full Authority is present. The project proposals asrecommended by SEAC
for Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide
letter No. 06-08 dated 16.01.2017 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical
University” located at Village NunaMajra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.
This case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on
05.12.2016 and decided to defer this case with decision that project
proponent should either submit the MOU agency which has EC or shall
have in-house facility as per para 5.2 of CPCB Guidelines.
The project proponent on 08.12.2016 submitted the reply which was
taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the
project proponent has not submitted a detailed plan of establishing the
bio-hazardous waste management plant, the technology to be deployed
and its location on the layout plan.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony “NimaiFamilia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 94th meeting of SEIAA held on
11.08.2016. It was observed that the report sought from Sh. Hitender
Singh, Arch. is still awaited. Accordingly, the case was deferred for want
of report from Sh. Hitender Singh, Arch. Member, SEAC.
The Report is submitted by Mr. Hitender Singh, Arch on 29.11.2016
which is considered in the today’s meeting. On the basis of earlier said
report and detailed reply submitted by the project proponent the
Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord
Environment Clearance to this project.
2
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on
26.08.2016 and the case was deferred wit h the following decisions:
[1] The height of the building 192.9 meter. The project proponent is required
to submit fire safety plan showing smooth movement of fire tender within
the project area.
[2] It was decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members
SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit
report to the SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Status of the construction achieved of existing project with details.
(ii) Status of construction of expansion project if any.
(iii) Whether the construction has been carried out in accordance with
the approved plans or not?
(iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by
using treated water.
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the
existing project.
(Vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
(VII) Reply to the observation raised at point [1] above.
The sub-committee has submitted the report on 15.12.2016along with the
reply of the project proponent the Authority deferred this case with the
decision that as the report has not been sent to Member, SEIAA thus
needs more time to study the report and reply submitted.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony on an area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 97th meeting of SEIAA held on
07.10.2016 and the case was deferred with the following observations:
3
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.1, 8.3, 9.1, 9.5 and 9.6 of
Form- 1A not properly explained.
[2] The project proponent is required to explain and ensure the use of CNG
and pool vehicles (page no. 51 of presentation).
[3] Frequency of AAQ monitoring during Operation Phase not given.
[4] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all
the seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture
and road washing as per prescribed norms.
[5] The project proponent should give exact number of labours to be
deployed as different figures have been given in Form-1.
[6] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of
DG/HVACsystem must passed through ‘Cooling Tower’. The location of
the same is not shown on the plan.
(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling
system. The entire quantity (22 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity
of treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be
mentioned.
[7] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel
requirement, source of procurement, storage and suggested safety
measures.
The Project Proponent submitted the reply on 15.12.2016 which is
considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] The project proponent may explain the fly ash handling system and APCM
to be installed on the site.
[2] Annexure 1 of the reply shows the capacity of DG Sets 1010 & 625 KVA,
whereas annexure-(IV)shows 1010/380/250 KVA a mismatch. The project
proponent may explain the mismatch.
[3] The DG sets of capacity 380 KVA & 250 KVA can be aircooled or may
have “cooling Coil” technology to conserve the water. Thus, PP is
suggested to install air cool or cooling coil technology for the DG sets.
[4] Annexure 4 shows the “Soft water Requirement”, The project proponent
may explain the means, methods and technology deployed to produce
soft water and asked to explain:
4
(i) Location of the softener
(ii) Re-usability/treatment/disposal of the reject of softener.
[5] The project proponent has shown the requirement of 5 KLD of treated
water for road washing which may not be a regular phenomenon, thus pp
is asked to explain the need of this much quantity of water.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It
was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the
office.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15 acres in the revenue estate of Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 97th meeting of SEIAA held on
07.10.2016 and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.3, 9.1, and 9.7 of Form-
1A not properly explained.
[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for
all the seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for
horticulture and road washing as per prescribed norms.
[3] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of
DG/HVAC system must passed through ‘Cooling Tower ‘ . The location
of the same is not shown on the plan.
(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling
system. The entire quantity (20 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity
of treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be
mentioned.
[4] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel
requirement, source of procurement, storage and suggested safety
measures.
5
The Project Proponent submitted the reply on 15.12.2016 which is
considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] The project proponent has said under Point No. (8.3) that fly ash will be used;
PP is asked to explain the fly ash handling system and APCM to be installed on
the site.
[2] The Form 1A shows the following installation of DG sets
Block A:- 2*1010 KVA and 1*625 KVA
Block B:- 2*625 KVA with such capacity of DG sets if running in even at half of
the load DG sets would be consuming more than 670 Ltr/hr. that seems to be
less considering the capacity of DG sets installed. Reply to observation 4 may
be substiated with a proper reference.
[3] Even in annexure 4 PP declares 4 hours of running of DG sets/day meaning
thereby 670*4= 2680 ltrs/day of diesel; PP is asked to explain the mode of
transportation, storage and safety measures/permission seems for such quantity
of diesel
[4] Explain the significance of “Air washer for DG sets and restaurants”; how these
would be consuming so much of water quantity.
[5] Annexure 1, shows 4.2 KLD as “evaporation losses”. Would the rate of
evaporation remain constant in all the 3 seasons?
[6] Location and carrying capacity of the sewer.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations
of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the
satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also
decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the
members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
located at Village-SahbajpurKhalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari, Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on
05.12.2016 wherein it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent shall submit water balance diagram, Annex.2 Fig
2(a), 260 KLD of treated water may be required initially and 14 KLD from
6
Cooling tower would remain in circuit, hence 246 KLD would be required
next time.
[2] 500KVA DG air cooled may be installed to conserve water.
[3] The project proponent shall submit the location of the “Cooling Tower” on
plan. Observation 4 is regarding location of cooling tower of DG sets not
for DG sets.
[4] Water getting evaporated is 3KLD from cooling of DG sets but diesel
required is just 1000lts/day, both are dependent on running hours of DG
sets, may be mismatch explained.
[5] Safety measures taken for the transportation &storage of Diesel, be
discussed. Quantity given may be revised.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 30.12.2016 which is
considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] Query to the reply of observation 2; the case was apprised on the basis of
3500 KVA of installation of DG Sets; now PP is stating to have 6000KVA
of DG sets to be installed, explain.
[2] Query to the reply of observation 5;as per the reply of observation no. 2,
DG sets of 6000KVA would be installed during operation phase and in
reply to observation no. 5 PP states that 6000KVA of DG sets would be
consuming 1000lts/day of diesel; which seems to be less. Such a big
installation would be requiring much more than 1000lts even if DG sets
supposed to run 2hrs/day. The project proponent is asked to explain the
mode of procurement, storage of such quantity of diesel and safety
measures taken. Any statutory obligation to be met.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It
was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the
office
7
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex “Corona Optus” located at revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Corona Housing Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 97th meeting of SEIAA held on
07.10.2016 and the case was deferred with the following observations:
[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 5.4, 8.1, 8.3 and 9.1 of
Form- 1A not properly explained.
[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all
the seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for
horticulture and road washing as per prescribed norms.
[3] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel
requirement, source of procurement, storage and suggested safety
measures.
[4] The project proponent should clarify the technology/system to be adopted
for DG cooling as water cooling system and Radiator cooling system
(page no. 19) has been proposed in different chapters.
[5] The project proponent required to give the exact units of power backup as
different figures have been given in the documents (page 20 & 25).
The Project Proponent submitted the reply on 05.12.2016 which is
considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] Explain the fly ash handling system and APCM to be installed on the site.
[2] If radiators will be deployed by PP then why need 31 KLD of water to cool
the DG sets. Explain.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations
of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the
satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also
decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the
members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
8
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on
05.12.2016 wherein it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Capacity of DG sets not matching p.g no.36 v/s 42
[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air
borne pollution which emanates from vehicular activities may be
reduced during the construction phase
[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing
reference of MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water
Use Reduction” be incorporated (Table 2.4)
[4] Shown 198 KLD of treated water to be discharged in sewer,
location & carrying capacity of Sewer.
[5] Incorporating the above written observations, the project proponent
is required to submit the water balance diagram for all the seasons.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 30.12.2016 and 13.01.2016
which was considered in the today’s meeting. After detailed deliberation, the Authority
decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance
to this project.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet” project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on
05.12.2016 wherein it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Pg. no. 33, per capita demand of water for guest rooms & villas is 320lts &
200lts per day, on what basis PP has arrived on this quantity, explain
[2] Asking for 15 lts/meal/person extra, on what basis
[3] Asking for 26.13 KLD of fresh water taking 2600 persons for banquet hall/
spa etc. etc., how did PP arrive on such a high fig.
[4] 40,000Lts/day fresh water for Laundry purposes, explain.
9
[5] 10 KLD fresh water for swimming pool, to replenish or replace?Area &
location of pool on layout to be shown.
[6] 10 KLD of fresh water for Filter Backwash, why treated water cannot be
used for Backwash &means of disposal water being used in Filter
Backwash , explain.
[7] Location, size & capacity of HVAC cooling tower, needing 151,000lts per
day for replenishment, explain.
[8] Pg. no. 35, Measures to be undertaken to reduce water demand during
construction phase, while part OC has been provided, showing some %
of construction is complete still needing 50,000lts water per day for
construction, explain.
[9] Pg. no.43; Location of OWC & composting pit on Lay-out to be shown.
[10] Pg. no. 42: Solid waste generation for hotel rooms is 1.0Kg/person/day &
for fixed population 0.1Kg/person/day, why this anomaly, explain.
[11] Pg. no. 54, diesel consumption 700lts/hr., DG sets meant for stand-by
operations, even if have to run for 4hrs a day need 2800lts diesel per day;
storage facility &the safety measures undertaken.
[12] The water consumption quantity seems to be very much on higher side,
PP is asked to re-submit the water balance diagram for all the three
seasons and accordingly be intimated to CGWB.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 28.12.2016 which is
considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] Query to the Reply to observation no. 5:
Approximately 6 to 7 mm of water persq.mt.of cross-sectional area of
swimming pool is lost due to evaporation.The rate of evaporation definitely
decreases during the winter & rainy season. Revised water balance
diagram shows the same quantity; therefore, pp is asked to revise and re-
submit the water balance diagram.
10
[2] Query to the Reply to observation no. 6:
PP has not explained, “The means of disposal of water being used for
filter backwash”.
[3] Query to the Reply to observation no. 7:
Same quantity of water would not be needed to replenish during winter &
rainy season. Secondly, the HVAC system may not be required to run
for the same tenure as in summer.
[4] Query to the Reply to observation no. 8:
50 KLD means 50,000 lt./day, How much quantity of brick
work/concreting/curing, would be done from the day one and the rate of
progress would remain constant by engaging, how many labours? The PP
is asked to submit the number of labours to be deployed and
settlements at the site.
[5] Query to the Reply to observation no. 11:
Reply as per annexure 4 is not satisfactory. Please refer Petroleum and
explosive Act for storage & transportation of petroleum products i.e.
diesel.
[6] Query to the Reply to observation no. 12
The PP has taken permission to draw ground water for CGWB vide letter
no. 1&2 dated 03.03.2014 of 340 Lt./minute & 345 lt./minute, respectively
for 9 hour/day; total quantity of water to be extracted on this basis would
be 369.9 Kl/day. Now vide letter no. nil dated 22.12.2016. PP has
intimated M.S. CGWB, to extract 310.09, 291.09 and 282.59 KLD
depending on the season. These bore wells would be the only source of
fresh water for the project. Gurgaon being a water scarce zone every step
should be taken to conserve water & reduce the consumption. PP must
install meters to measure the output of bore wells & must keep a record of
the same as the consumption of water in this project isoccupancy
dependent the record must be kept to correlate the same.
11
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It
was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the
office.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony at Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s St. Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.
This case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on
05.12.2016 wherein it was observed by the Authority that:
[1] 343KLD of fresh water requirement shown & assurance from HUDA
obtained for 420KLD.
[2] Instead of “Tyre Washing” provide Water Troughs at entry & exit of
project to conserve water.
[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing
reference of MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use
Reduction” be incorporated (Table 2.4)
[4] The calculations shown for Water Demand for Cooling Tower citing
reference of MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system not
for DG set cooling tower.
[5] Running of DG sets shown 2hrs a day (pg. no. 56) and water required
for cooling of DG sets is 16KLD that too in all three seasons; a
mismatch and illogical. Secondly, this much quantity of water may not
lost in evaporation, major quantity still be in circuit
[6] Location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan
[7] The Project Proponent submit a new Water Balance Diagram (for all the
three seasons separately) taking above written observations into
consideration
[8] Plantation plan with said no. of trees & canopy area 25 sq. mt be
submitted depicting on the green-area reserved for the same
12
The project proponent submitted the reply on 27.12.2016 which is
considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] Annexure-6 of the reply to the observation raised in 98th meeting canopy
area 25 sqmt & spacing 2x2 mts is a mismatch. 25 sqmt. area means
2.8 mts of radius; hence spacing would be at least 2.8+2.8= 5.6 mts.
Revisit and resubmit the reply.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It
was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all
the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the
office.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance construction of proposed New police line situated in Zila Jail, Karnal, Haryana by M/s Haryana Police Housing Corporation.
The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 has recommended to
de-list this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to
provide the vital information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various
letters and final notice. In the absence of the vital information it was not
possible to appraise the project for the environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the
light of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII
(Part) dated 30-10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide
letter dated 28.07.2014 submitted application for Environmental
Clearance New police line situated in Zila Jail, Karnal, Haryana.The
Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members
SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
(ii) Justifiable reason to seek the de-listing of the project.
13
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case
with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted Colony located at Village Jaroda and Jewarhari, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s S.N.Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 has recommended to
de-list this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the
light of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-
10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated
01.09.2014submitted application for Environmental Clearance for construction of
Residential Plotted Colony located at Village Jaroda and Jewarhari, District Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
(ii) Justifiable reason to seek the de-listing of the project.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case
with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Construction of factory,
located at Plot No. 10, Sector-5, Growth Centre [Now known as IMT Bawal], Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana by M/s Pearl Global Industries Ltd.
The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 has recommended to
de-list this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
14
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the
light of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-
10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 21.10.2014
submitted application for Environmental Clearance for Construction of factory, located
at Plot No. 10, Sector-5, Growth Centre [Now known as IMT Bawal], Bawal, District
Rewari, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
(ii) Justifiable reason to seek the de-listing of the project.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case
with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed Institutional Project “PrannathParnami University” located at Chaudhariwas, Hisar, Haryana by MRS Shree PrannathParnami Education Society.
The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 has recommended to
de-list this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the
absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the
environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the
light of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-
10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated
11.11.2014submitted application for Environmental Clearance for proposed Institutional
Project “PrannathParnami University” located at Chaudhariwas, Hisar, Haryana.The
Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
(ii) Justifiable reason to seek the de-listing of the project.
15
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case
with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for mining of Gypsum (Minor Minerals) at
Saharwa, Dariyapur and GaranpurKalan over an area of 10.20 Ha. in District Hisar and Bhiwani by M/s Joginder Enterprises.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s
Joginder Enterprises for mining of Gypsum (Minor Minerals) at Saharwa, Dariyapur and
GaranpurKalan over an area of 10.20 Ha. in District Hisar and Bhiwani by imposing
stipulations stated therein.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 16.09.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 recommended this
project for environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-2
project.
3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by
Mines and Geology Department Haryana for mining of Stone along with
associated minor minerals of Saharwa, Dariyapur and GaranpurKalan
over an area of 10.20 Ha. in District Hisar and Bhiwanifor a period of 10
years vide letter dated 22.06.2016.
4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan,
NOC from Forest Department.
5. The proposed production is 38,000 MTPA for first 10 years. The water
requirement is 18 KLD.
6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 200 saplings every year
for first 5 years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with
the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by
imposing conditions.
16
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for setting up Commercial Complex (3.8625 Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Commander Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance
subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Commercial
Complex (3.8625 Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon,
Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 15635.568 sqm (3.8625 Acres)
2. Built up area 55580.997 sqm
3. License Valid up 16.05.2017
4. Amenities Office complex, 3 level of basements
5. Height 34.45 Meter
6. Green belt 26.80%
7. Water requirement 342 KLD
8. Fresh Water 45 KLD
9. Waste Water 115 KLD
10. STP Capacity 140 KLD
11. Power Requirement 3823.50 KVA DHBVN
12 Solid Waste 744 kg/day (01 nos. of OWC proposed for 438.96 kg/day)
13. ECS 556 ECS
14. RWH 04 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in
the today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] At. 3; Pg. No. 39, of presentation “Minimization of water consumption” stating
sweep with a broom & pan to be used for cleaning of the road still needing 13
KLD for “Road Maintenance” that too for rainy & winter season.
[2] Water balance diagram shows 29 KLD of treated water for Horticulture
remaining constant in all the three seasons. Definitely the water requirement for
horticulture will go down during raining and winter season.
[3] The water balance diagram shows daily requirement of 5 KLD for water body
but it has to be replenishment not the replacement.
17
[4] 3 x 1500 KVA DG Sets for stand-by purposes;how do these the requiring 45
KLD of treated water for cooling purposes? Location of the cooling tower of DG
sets may be shown of the layout plan.
[5] On Page. No. 8 ofForm IA; 729.8 Ltrs of diesel per hour is required for the
running of DG Sets. Even if DG sets to run 4 Hrs/day the quantity required
would be approximately 2900 ltrs/day means to procure, store & safety
measures undertaken and any statutory obligation to be met; explain.
[6] Water requirement shown for chillers etc. seems to be very much on higher
side; water is required to replenish not to replace; substantiate with proper
calculations.
[7] PP may incorporate the recommendations of MOEF for water use reduction &
may submit separate water balance diagrams for all the three season.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case
with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply
to the above raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Project located at
Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, Haryana by M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance
subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group
Housing Project located at Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh
Complex, Haryanaas under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 10610.84 sqm (2.622 Acres)
2. Built up area 35715.792 sqm
3. License Valid up 19.08.2019
4. Amenities 02 Basements, Convenient shopping
5. Nos. of DU 76 General DU, 08 Service personal units and 14 EWS units,
6. Height 43.13 Meter (AAI obtained)
7. Green belt 33.19%
8. Water requirement 64 KLD
9. Fresh Water 42 KLD
10. Waste Water 56 KLD
11. STP Capacity 80 KLD
12 Power Requirement 1866 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 241 kg/day
18
14. ECS 290 ECS
15. RWH 03 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in
the today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Abstract of the report submitted to SEAC for approval of Group Housing
Colony” shows 2 x 380 KVA of DG sets; whereas reply submitted on 29/11/16
(pg. no. 8) shows 1 x 100 KVA requiring 1 KLD of water for cooling.
[2] The 100 KVA and380 KVA DG sets can be air cooled , thereby, needing no
water for cooling purposes.
[3] On the Page. no. 87 of Form IA; landscape area 3183.252 sqmt. Reply
submitted on 29/11/16 pg. no. 8 shows either 2652.71/ or 3522.88 sqmt
which is correct?
[4] Water being a scarce resource must be conserved; PP may incorporate the
recommendations of MOEF (Table 2.4: Estimation of water Use Reduction)
[5] Pt. 8.1; Form IA; not explained properly.
[6] Water required for horticulture cannot be same in all three seasons. The
separate water balance diagram for all the three seasons may be
resubmitted while incorporating all that is suggested to reduce the water
consumption.
[7] Under pt. 8.3; PP states that Fly ash would be utilized in road construction,
PP is asked to explain the type, capacity & technology employed for Fly ash
handling system & APCM to be installed to control fugitive emissions while
using Fly ash.
[8] Pt. 9.1; What is the energy consumption assumed per sqft of built up area; not
mentioned.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case
with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply
to the above raised observation within 15 days period.
******
1
Minutes of the 100th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 1st March, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 57-59 dated 16.02.2017 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1]Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical
University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.
The case was considered in the 99th meeting of SEIAA held on 19.01.2017 and the
case was deferred.
The project proponent on 13.02.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] The pp should ensure that proposed Bio-medical Waste processing unit is at least
500 mt away from any inhabited area and an undertaking in this regard be
submitted.
[2] The proposed measures for mitigation of air pollution be submitted.
[3] Methods and means of disposal of ash and disposal of scrubber water (if any) be
submitted.
[4] The odor control measures proposed be submitted.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Expansion of Group Housing
Complex” at Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s Ruhil Promoters
Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s Kashi Promoters Pvt. Ltd.).
The case was considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the PP may be asked to submit
satisfactory reply and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.
The project proponent on 26.09.2016 and site visit report on 17.02.2017 submitted
the reply which was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority
studied and discussed the reply in detail and found the following observations:
2
[1] The PP should incorporate the recommendations of MOEF for “Water use
Reduction” as in table 2.4
[2] The PP has shown 35 KLD of water for DG set cooling out of which 4 KLD
would be residual/or waste water; plan to treat the same be explained. The PP
should also explain how to dispose/handle the waste/reject generated during the
treatment of such water.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony at
Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarv
Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the PP may be asked to submit
satisfactory reply and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and with the site visit report to accord Environment
Clearance to this project.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing colony at
village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the PP may be asked to submit
satisfactory reply and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.
As per the site visit report freshly excavated soil has been kept under tarpaulin
whereas the PP has assured in Form 1A that the excavated top soil cover would be kept
separately as temporary soil bank to use the same for horticulture/landscaping; PP must
explain the absence of the top soil cover.
In view of the site visit report and the above written observation the case has been
deferred for want of reply from project proponent.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the PP may be asked to submit
3
satisfactory reply and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.
As per the site visit report freshly excavated soil has been kept under tarpaulin
whereas the PP has assured in Form 1A that the excavated top soil cover would be kept
separately as temporary soil bank to use the same for horticulture/landscaping; PP must
explain the absence of the top soil cover.
In view of the site visit report and the above written observation the case has been
deferred for want of reply from project proponent.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony at
Sector-48, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sweta Estates Pvt.
Ltd.
The case was considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.
N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.
Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up area; as per
notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Project located at Village
Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, Haryana by
M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 99th meeting of SEIAA held on 19.01.2017. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be
asked to submit satisfactory reply.
The project proponent on 06.02.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] The pp should submit an undertaking to install air cooled DG sets of 380 x 2
KVA.
[2] The pp should incorporate the MoEF & CC, GoI guidelines for ’”water use
reduction “ as given in table 2.4 and resubmit the water balance diagram.
[3] The pp should explain what is assumed power consumption per.sq.ft. of area.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
4
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for setting up Commercial Complex (3.8625
Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Commander Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 99th meeting of SEIAA held on 19.01.2017. The
Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be
asked to submit satisfactory reply.
The project proponent on 08.02.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] The pp was supposed to show the size of the water body and the quantity of water
required to replenish.
[2] The water loss due to evaporation/drifting etc. in the cooling tower may lead to
increase in:”TDS” in the residual water. PP should explain the methods and means
to treat this water and handle/dispose the rejects thus obtained.
http://www.cumminsindia.com/documents/dbu/genset_installation_recommendati
on.pdf
[3] The pp may submit an affidavit that the necessary permissions/clearances would
be obtained from the concern Authorities for storage of diesel and will take all
the necessary safety measures.
[4] The PP should submit a’ “schematic plan” showing how to treat the residual
water in the circuit of DG set cooling along with the plan to handle/dispose the
rejects so obtained.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex project – Spaze
Buziness Park, Sector-66, Village- badshahpur, District-Gurgaon by
M/S KAY KAY Designer Towers Pvt. Ltd.
This case was considered in the 83rd meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015
wherein, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC.
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observations:
The PP should explain the following:
Form 1A
Pt. 8.33 – PP States to us Fly Ash in building Structure; how to procure; handle &
mitigate air pollution.
Pt. 9.1 – What is the energy consumption assumed per square feet of built-up area?
Pt. 9.5/9.6 – Not explained/replied properly
5
Pt. 9.7 – Are you using CFC & HCFC free chillers? Provide Specifications
Water Balance Diagram:
12.6 KLD of treated water for DG Sets cooling which is on the higher side and pp
should show the location of the cooling tower in the lay out plan.
Does the discharge of STP needs further treatment to make it suitable for the
cooling tower?
What are the most likely characteristics of Water available & desired
characteristics of inlet water of “Cooling Towers”? How PP is planning to treat the
available water to match the required properties of inlet water of cooling towers.
Secondly, if water has to be treated to reduce TDS/Hardness/or some other
undesired component, how PP is planning to handle/dispose off the rejects/waste
of such treatment? Provide the “Schematic Plan” of the same.
Road washing cannot be regular phenomenon requiring 8.59 KLD of water,
explain.
What about winter & rainy season; when water requirement for horticulture would
be less? Provide separate “ Water Balance Charts” for the season
Diesel
PP states 500 Ltr./Hrs of diesel is required for DG Sets; for even 6 Hrs of
operation 3000 Ltr/Day of diesel; how to transport; store and safety measure
proposed to store and handle the fuel.
The pp may submit an affidavit that the necessary permissions/clearances would
be obtained from the concerned Authorities for storage of diesel and will take all
the necessary safety measures.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[10]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Stone along with associated
minor minerals at Jojhu Kalan, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani,
Haryana having area of 6.00 ha. by M/s MSK-JV.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Mining of
Stone along with associated minor minerals at Jojhu Kalan, Tehsil-Dadri, District-
Bhiwani, Haryana over an area of 6.00 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 26.08.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 16.12.2016 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-2 project.
3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Mines and
Geology Department Haryana mining of Stone along with associated minor
6
minerals at Jojhu Kalan, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana for a period of
10 years vide letter dated 11.04.2016.
4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
5. The proposed production is 11,00,000 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 23 KLD.
6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 200 saplings every year for first 5
years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
Form 1
Pt.3.8.1
Type & layout of “Dust Suppression System” requiring 15 KLD of water be
explained
How to suppress or minimize the fugitive particles going to atmosphere during
transferring or loading operations of minerals?
Water trough be provided at entry & exit to wash the tyres of vehicles & mining
machines
Pt. 2.6
Storage of diesel & related safety measures, provide details
Safe distance between magazine & diesel storage, provide details
To prevent spillage of “Diesel” & “Spent Oil” measures suggested?
Pt.7.2
Design & drawing of Septic tank/soak pit be shown & how does domestic/office
effluent be treated in individual septic tank (pt.4.2)
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[11]Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Project in
located at Shikhopur, Sector-77, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar
MGF Land Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Expansion of Group
Housing Project in located at Shikhopur, Sector-77, Gurgaon, Haryana.
Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up area; as per
notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC, GoI.
7
Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex
project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The case was taken up by the SEIAA in its 96th meeting held on 22.09.2016 and
refer back this case to SEAC.
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observation:
[1] The PP should submit the copy of renewed license along with the definite proof of
EDC/IDC deposited.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[13]Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio Medical Waste
Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, Village
Bazida Jatan, near railway crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal,
Haryana by M/s. Haat Supreme Wastech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for TOR subject to stipulation stated
therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Common Bio Medical Waste Treatment
Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, Village Bazida Jatan, near railway
crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the SEIAA approved the
“Terms of Reference” as appraised by the SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 14.12.2016; in
the mean while project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and
regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR
studies.
Item No.[14]Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste
Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1
kite. No 50, Tadadi No 314, village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala,
District Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Esskay Hygienic Services.
The SEAC has recommended this project for TOR subject to stipulation stated
therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment
Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1 kite. No 50, Tadadi No 314,
village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala, District Panchkula, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the SEIAA approved the
“Terms of Reference” as appraised by the SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 14.12.2016; in
the mean while project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and
regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR
studies.
8
Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Bhatola, Sector-85,
Faridabad, Haryana by M/s VRP Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 21.11.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 15.12.2016 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 20461.885 sqm (5.05 Acres)
2. Built up area 59680.89 sqm
3. License Valid up 19.09.2021
4. Nos. of Towers 07 residential Towers + Basement + Stilt +
Max. 14 floors, commercial area,
Anganwadi/crèche and community hall
5. Height 49 Meter
6. Green belt 20.05%
7. Water requirement 538 KLD
8. Fresh Water 334 KLD
9. Waste Water 442 KLD
10. STP Capacity 530 KLD
11 Power Requirement 4195 KVA DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 1939 kg/day
13. ECS 375 ECS and 730 for two wheelers
14. RWH 06 pits
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observation:
[1] The PP is asked to submit fresh water balance diagram of all 3 seasons
incorporating the recommendations of MoEF for water reduction as in table 2.4
and pp is further asked to revisit the shown requirement of 7 lt. per sqmt of water
for horticulture.
[2] Form 1A
Under point 8.3, PP has mentioned, “Portland Cement” as recyclable material
(page no. 45); explain.
Under point 9.1; what is the energy consumption assumed per sqft. of built up area
not explained.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
9
Item No.[16]Environmental Clearance for Expansion of “DLF Cyber Park” in
Udyog Vihar, Sector 20, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DLF Cyber City
Developers Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Expansion of “DLF Cyber
Park” in Udyog Vihar, Sector 20, Gurgaon, Haryana.
Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up area; as per
notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[17]Environmental Clearance for proposed River Sand (Minor Mineral)
Mining Project for River Yamuna in “South Block/YRN B17”
(21,88,008 TPA), ML area 49.67 Ha Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Jagadri
District -Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Elite mining corporation.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for River Sand
(Minor Mineral) Mining Project for River Yamuna in “South Block/YRN B17”
(21,88,008 TPA), ML area 49.67 Ha Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Jagadri District -Yamuna
Nagar, Haryana by imposing stipulations stated therein.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 17.03.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 133rd meeting held on 05.05.2016 approved the TOR for EIA
study. The public hearing was held on 19.08.2016. The study period December
2015 to February 2016 and One month additional study in month May 2016 as per
suggest SEAC, Haryana.
3. The SEAC in its 147th meeting held on 31.01.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
4. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Mines and
Geology Department Haryana for mining of Stone along with associated minor
minerals of River Yamuna in “South Block/YRN B17” (21,88,008 TPA), ML area
49.67 Ha Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Jagadri District -Yamuna Nagar, Haryana for
a period of 09 years vide letter dated 30.11.2015.
5. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
6. The proposed production is 21,88, 008 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 11.45 KLD.
7. The project proponent has proposed to plant 3420 saplings every year for first 5
years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
10
[1] The pp should submit the arrangement to be made to ensure that no seepage of
diesel/spent oil would take place.
[2] The pp should submit the plan for transportation and storage of diesel and related
safety measures.
[3] The pp should submit a plan to ensure that no fugitive emission would take place
due to plying of vehicles/movement of machineries.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[18]Environmental Clearance for Modification & Expansion of
Commercial Complex Project (12.206 Acre) located at Sector-16,
Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Brahma Centre Development Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 07.10.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 147th meeting held on 30.01.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area Existing 52123.51 sqm Mod./Expansion -
2727.965 sqm Total 49395.545 (12.206
Acres)
2. Built up area Existing 160708 sqm Expansion 58860.243
sqm Total 219568.243 sqm.
3. License Allotment letter by HSIIDC Dated
11.06.2010
4. Amenities IT/ Office building, Retails/ Shops Food
court and Auditorium
5. Height 98.375 Meter
6. Green belt 26.386%
7. Water requirement 1096 KLD
8. Fresh Water 535 KLD
9. Waste Water 623 KLD
10. STP Capacity 750 KLD
11. Power Requirement 12.871 MW DHBVN
12 Solid Waste 5127 kg/day
13. ECS 2697 ECS
14. RWH 12 pits (6 nos. of pits with dual bore)
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observation:
CTE expired on 09.09.2016
The PP is asking for 1792 ML of water for construction (‘ML’ stands for million
liters) . Provide the daily requirement linked to volume of construction in phased
manner
11
Water Balance Diagram
PP is proposing to use 256 KLD & 80 KLD of “Fresh water” for HVAC cooling &
DG Cooling respectively. The pp must use the treated water for the cooling of
HVAC and DG sets.
How PP is planning to treat the available water to match the required properties of
inlet water of cooling tower. Secondly, if water has to be treated to reduce
TDS/Hardness/or some other undesired component, how PP is planning to
handle/dispose off the rejects/waste of such treatment?
The entire quantity of water may not evaporate in the said cooling towers; residual
water would be having high concentration of salts; how does PP contemplate to
treat this water? How the residual or rejects would be handled/disposed off?
How would the water generated through “Filer Back Wash” be treated?
Water requirement for cooling of DG sets and HVAC has shown to remain
constant during all the three seasons; explain.
Incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use Reduction” as in table
2.4.
The pp after making the necessary amendments in the water balance diagram;
should submit separate water balance diagram for each season.
PP has suggested 1 tree/80 Sq. Meter citing MOEF guidelines whereas in some
other cases the SEAC has appraised on the basis of canopy area of 25 sqmt per
tree.
Form – 1A
Pt. 8.1; not explained properly
Pt. 8.3; what about the debris or the other construction waste to be generated
during the execution of the project?
Pt. 9.1; what is the energy consumption assumed per square foot of built-up area?
Pt. 9.7; sates that it is a commercial complex & will be centrally air-conditioned;
would these be CEC & HCFC free, explain?
Quantity of the top soil excavated or to be excavated? And its storage
D G Sets:
PP has proposed to install 9 DG sets (7x2000 KVA + 2x1010 KVA) as standby &
made the water requirement on the basis of assumption of 8 Hrs. per day running,
thereby generating a good quantity of spent oil/black oil; its storage/disposal be
explained.
The quantity of the diesel required its transportation/storage and related safety
measures to be undertaken and pp should submit an affidavit regarding obtaining
the required clearances/permissions from the concerned authorities and
undertaking all the safety measures.
12
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[19]Environmental Clearance for expansion of Piyala LPG Plant at Piyala,
Near Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The SEAC was taken up this case for appraisal in the 147th meeting of the SEAC
held on 31.01.2017 and recommended to SEIAA for exemption of the case.
In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority decided to call
the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next
meeting to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.
Item No.[20]Environmental Clearance for mining of Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2,
Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-Bhiwani,
Haryana by M/s United Mining Corporation.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the mining of
Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2, Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-
Bhiwani, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed
that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of
Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to
consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice
to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which
the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for Revision/Expansion for Group Housing
Project “Regency Park” at Sector 11 A & 17, Hisar, Haryana by M/s
Hisar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 30.11.2015 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 147th meeting held on 31.01.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 48890.07 sqm
2. Built up area Existing 135581.9 sqm. Revision-7073.181
sqm. Total 128508.719
3. License 29.11.2017
4. Towers 8 towers + EWS + Villas + Schools
(G+S+13)
5. Height 98.375 Meter
6. Green belt 26.386%
7. Water requirement 592 KLD
8. Fresh Water KLD
9. Waste Water 473 KLD
13
10. STP Capacity 520 KLD + 50 KLD
11. Power Requirement 5450 KVA DHBVN
12 Solid Waste 2083 kg/day
13. ECS 1275 ECS
14. RWH 9 pits
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observation:
Water Balance diagram:
o May incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use Reduction”
as in table 2.4
o PP has given a constant demand of 7 Ltr./Sq. mtr. for horticulture but the
demand of water for horticulture & landscape would be different in
different season i.e. summer, winter & rainy season.
o The pp should submit separately the revised water balance diagram for all
the three seasons after making the necessary amendments.
Form 1 A
Pt. 8.1/8.3/9.1 are not explained properly
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[22]Environmental Clearance for Revision/Expansion of Residential
Plotted Colony “Sushant City” at Village Rasoi, District Sonepat,
Haryana by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Revision/Expansion of
Residential Plotted Colony “Sushant City” at Village Rasoi, District Sonepat, Haryana.
Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up area; as per
notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[23]Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste
Treatment Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz Ka Meo Industrial
area, Sohna, Mewat, Haryana by Synergy Waste Management Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for TOR subject to stipulation stated
therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment
Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz Ka Meo Industrial area, Sohna, Mewat, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority decided to
“Terms of Reference” approved by the SEIAA as appraised by the SEAC in its 147th
meeting of the SEAC held on 30.01.2017.
Item No.[24]Environmental Clearance for construction of “shopping complex” at
14
Block-H, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Natural Product
Bio-Tech Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 18.03.2015 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above. Due to the lapse term of
SEIAA/SEAC the case could not be appraised and transferred to MoEF & CC,
GoI. No action taken by MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was returned to SEIAA
after its reconstitution.
2. The SEAC in its 147th meeting held on 31.01.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance on the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 8012.763 sqm.
2. Total Built up area 20408.213 sqm
3. License
4. Height 34.150 Meter
5. Amenities Service apartments, shops, Offices and fine
dining
6. Green belt 25.20
7. Water requirement 137 KLD
8. Fresh Water 54 KLD
9. Waste Water 85 KLD
10. STP Capacity 150 KLD
11. Solid Waste 426 kg/day
12. ECS 234 ECS
13. RWH 2 pits
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observation:
Water Balance Diagram
Water Demand for the cooling Tower of HVAC
The pp has shown that 9 KLD of “Fresh Water ” and 24 KLD of, “Treated
Water” will be required for HVAC cooling; evaporation/drifting etc. would result
in to water loss which may lead to increase in, “TDS” in the residual water a,
Schematic plan” be submitted showing the treatment of such water and
handling/disposing the rejects thus obtained.
8 KLD for “Filter Back Wash” how this water will be treated & how the
rejects/wastes would be handled?
May incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on water us reduction as in table
2.4
PP may resubmit “ Water Balance Chart” separately for every season different
seasons after making the required amendments/corrections
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
15
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[25]Environmental Clearance for construction of Plotted Township namely
“Suncity Township” at Sector-34, 35 & 36, Village Bohar and Pada,
District Rohtak, Haryana by M/s Suncity Builldcon Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of Plotted
Township namely “Suncity Township” at Sector-34, 35 & 36, Village Bohar and Pada,
District Rohtak, Haryana.
Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up area; as per
notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC, GoI.
Item No.[26]Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project at
Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Sare Reality Pvt.
Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 30.04.2014 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above. Due to the lapse term of
SEIAA/SEAC the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GoI. No action taken by
MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.
2. The SEAC in its 147th meeting held on 31.01.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance on the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 69654.38 sqm. (17.212 Acres)
2. Total Built up area 210229.311 sqm
3. License 06.06.2018
4. Height 75 Meter
5. 2 Basements
930 DU, 164 EWS and 93 Servant Unit
Amenities Community Center, commercial Centre, Nursery
& Primary School
6. Green belt 31.43%
7. Water requirement 921 KLD
8. Fresh Water 515 KLD
9. Waste Water 674 KLD
10. STP Capacity 810 KLD
11. Solid Waste 2620 kg/day
12. ECS 2084 ECS
13. RWH 17 pits
In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and
found the following observation:
The Sultanpur wildlife sanctuary is at 7 Km radius, as declared by PP Pg. No. 176.
pp should submit the relevant proof of the same.
Water Balance Diagram
16
o The pp should incorporate the recommendations of MOEF for “ Water use
Reduction” as in table 2.4
o Water trough may be provided at entry/exit so that the tyre of vehicles can
be washed
o PP may resubmit the “Water Balance Chart” for each season separately
after making necessary amendments
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[27] Extension of Environmental Clearance of proposed Group Housing
Project, Express Greens II, Sector MIA, Sector MIA (19.643 acres),
Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the
environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated
01.04.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 31.03.2014. The project proponent vide
letter dated 20.03.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of
environmental clearance letter for further two years. The project proponent informed that
120581.52 sqm of area has been constructed against the built up area of 180233 sqm i.e
80% of construction work has been completed. The project proponent also submitted
copy of valid license and certified copy of compliance report issued by RO, MOEF GOI,
Chandigarh. The project proponent also informed that the construction has been raised in
accordance with the approved plans and the Authority decided to grant extension of
validity of environmental clearance letter for further two years.
The project proponent again request to kindly grant the extension of validity of
Environmental Clearance from 2 years to 5 years i.e. for another 3 years, up to
27.10.2019.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the
site for inspection and submit the report on the above within 15 days period.
Item No.[28] Complaint against Member Secretary SEIAA, Haryana for issuing a
letter dated 14.03.2016 against the Law of Raheja Developers Ltd.
(RDL) for their project Atharva at Sector-109, Gurgaon.
A complaint was received on 03.01.2017. The complainant was summoned of
appearing in person in 99th meeting of SEIAA on 19.01.2017 to explain the facts of the
complaint. During the meeting Authority decided to obtain the comments from the
17
concerned Ex-Member Secretary and also provide opportunity to M/s Raheja Developers
to appear in person/depute the authorized person before the authority to explain the
position.
After perusal of the original file record, comments of Sh. S.K.Goyal Ex. Member
Secretary SEIAA, reply filed by M/s Raheja Developers, complaint, Authority has come
to conclusion that there is no merit in complaint. The authority decided to file the
complaint.
********
1
Minutes of the 101st meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 22nd March, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS
(Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana,
Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification
dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 172- 174 dated 21.03.2017 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing colony at
village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 07.03.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed that the reply
of project proponent does not quantify the top soil excavated and reused for the gardening
or landscaping purposes, record in this regard not provided. Secondly, the project
proponent has replied that the some quantity of soil has been used in road construction
and leveling purposes which is not permissible.
As per the Form 1A the top soil cover should be preserved and must be used for
landscaping and gardening purposes. A notice in this regard should be issued to project
proponent for the violation under Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 07.03.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed that the reply
of project proponent does not quantify the top soil excavated and reused for the gardening
or landscaping purposes, record in this regard not provided. Secondly, the project
proponent has replied that the some quantity of soil has been used in road construction
and leveling purposes which is not permissible.
As per the Form 1A the top soil cover should be preserved and must be used for
landscaping and gardening purposes. A notice in this regard should be issued to project
proponent for the violation under Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.
2
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for mining of Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2,
Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-Bhiwani,
Haryana by M/s United Mining Corporation.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for mining of
Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2, Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-
Bhiwani, Haryana over an area of 22.90 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a
period of 12 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent
(LOI) dated 11.04.2016. The lease has been granted for an area of 22.90 Ha having
Village Manakawas, Plot No.2. The project proponent on 27.09.2016 submitted online
application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of
Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted
copy NOC from Forest Department. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a)
as category B-1 project as no other mine lease area is located within 500 meter.
The proposed production is 45,00,000 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 36.33 KLD. The project proponent has proposed to plant 500 saplings
every year for first 5 years along the roads, in barren area.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex project – Spaze
Buziness Park, Sector-66, Village- badshahpur, District-Gurgaon by
M/S KAY KAY Designer Towers Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 15.03.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
Water balance diagram
[1] Cooling tower for DG sets, as proposed by PP would be installed on terrace of
Block-A; the water required for cooling would not be same in all three seasons.
The water requirement would be considerably less in winter considering the
installation of Cooling Tower
[2] 500KVA DG sets should be either “Air Cooled” or have some alternate cooling
technology to conserve water
[3] Rejects/discharge of “Softening Plant” without treatment, probably not allowed
to discharge in municipal/HUDA sewer.
3
[4] PP has submitted that road washing will be carried out whenever it would be
required, then why 8.59/6.0/4.0 KLD (Kilo Liters per day)? Secondly,
Annexure 2 shows the same quantity of 8.59KLD for all the three seasons in
“Water Balance Diagram”
Diesel
[5] PP has stated that minimum 22Hrs per day of Power supply is available and thus
calculated diesel consumption/storage on the basis of 2 hrs of running of DG sets
but in Annexure 1 PP has shown 4-5 hrs per day of running of DG sets for
“Cooling water Requirement”; Why this anomaly?
[6] PP should resubmit the “Water Balance Charts” for all the three seasons
separately after incorporating the required amendments
In view of the above, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision
that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Piyala LPG Plant at Piyala,
Near Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017. The
authority decided to call the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in
person in the next meeting to present their case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the
next meeting.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and the authorized representative
appeared in the meeting to present their case. The representative of the project proponent
appear in person in the next meeting to present their case. Accordingly, the case was
deffered to the next meeting.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and the Authorized representative
appeared in the meeting to present their case. The representative put forward their case by
citing the reference of a “MoEF & CC” letter dated 09th June, 2016 issued to M/s Bharat
Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Teela Shahbajpur, Uttar Pardesh and submitted an affidavit
stating that there will be no change in process / technology/ location of the unit; no
capacity enhancement / no change in product mix will take place and there will not be
any expansion in storage and bulk storage capacity will remain the same i.e. 8050 MT.
The representative submitted in writing that even after installing the new equipment the
daily production of the unit will remain same i.e. 1000 MT and submitted a copy of
“CTO” obtained from HSPCB dated 16.02.2016 valid up to 31.03.2019.
After detailed deliberation on the above subject and after going through all the
facts / papers / reference put forward by the representative; the authority decided to agree
with the recommendations of SEAC and noted that the features which will be added in
the existing plant do not attract the provision of EIA, Notification 2006 provided only
4
one 72 station Flex Carousal replaces the currently deployed three carousal of 24 stations
and will be placed in the same shed and will not alter the lay-out of plant and will not
have any bearing on “Environmental Health”.
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex
project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 20.03.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The M/s Ramparstha has applied for grant of EC for
2 acres of land out of 128.94 acres of land for which license No. 44 of 2010 has been
granted. This license which expired on 09.06.2016 has been applied for renewal. M/s
Ramprastha has sold 2 acres of land to M/s JMS Buildtech as per the documents
submitted. It was decided that M/s JMS Buildtech should submit an affidavit stating the
following:-
1. That they have paid their share of EDC/IDC to M/s Ramprastha who has deposited
the same to the concerned authorities.
2. That the M/S JMS Buildtech will be solely responsible for making arrangements
for the discharge of excess treated water, solid waste management & upkeepment
of STP etc.
3. That the M/S JMS Buildtech along with M/S Ramprastha will be responsible for
the compliances of all the conditions of Environmental Clearance.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and the project proponent directed to submit the satisfactory clarification to the
raised observation within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to the Authority and after approval the letter shall be
issued by the office.
Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for setting up Commercial Complex (3.8625
Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Commander Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 20.03.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in
detail and found the following observations:
[1] 5 KLD water loss due to evaporation in a 390 sqmt water body is very much on
the higher side. The project proponent is asked to revisit the reply.
5
[2] Detailed plan to reduce the hardness/TDS of water to be used for cooling towers of
DG sets/HVAC. How to handle/dispose the rejects? How much assumed quantity
of waste to be generated/dispose?
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit
the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within
30 days period.
Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex
at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bluejays Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may
clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 05.05.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex at
Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. A. K. Bhatia and Shri
Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the
following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the
site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15
days period.
Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing
Colony “Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village
Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana M/s Rurban Development
Corporation Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may
clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 01.08.2013 submitted
6
application for Environmental Clearance for development of Group Housing Colony
“Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal,
Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. G. R. Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. A. K.
Bhatia, Member SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. G. R. Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. A. K.Bhatia, Member SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-
residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Ferozpur Namak Village,
Nuh Taluk Mewat District Haryana by Police Housing Corporation
Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may
clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 27.06.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-
residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat
District Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site
for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15 days
period.
Item No.[11]Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential and Non-
residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Bahraula Village, Palwal
Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing
Corporation Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may
clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
7
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 27.06.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-
residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat
District Haryana. The Authority decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site
for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15 days
period.
Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project
located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana by M/s
Navtech Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may
clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 31.08.2015 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project located at
Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. G. R.
Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. R. K. Sapra, Member SEAC shall visit the site for
inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. G. R. Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. R. K. Sapra, Member SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village
Sohna Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing
Corporation.
The case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016. The
Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may
clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
8
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 28.07.2014 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village Sohna
Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana. The Authority decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.
Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following
point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site
for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15 days
period.
Item No.[14]Environmental Clearance for Bio Medical Waste Management &
Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace
City-II, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vulcan Waste Management Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Bio Medical Waste
Management & Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace City-
II, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 4047 sqm. (1 Acres)
2. Total Capacity of
Plant
1. Incinerator
2. Autoclave
3. Shredder
20 tons/day
500 kg/hr
500 kg/batch
250 kg/hr
3. Estimated cost 2.50 crores
4. Power 90 KW (DHBVN)
5. Green belt 31.31%
6. Treated waste water
used for
Scrubbing, Gardening and Washing of Vehicles.
7. Water requirement 6 KLD
8. Fresh Water 2.7 KLD
9. Waste Water 3.5 KLD ETP 5 KLD
10. Solid Waste 10-15 kg/day
The case was consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project
proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the member of Authority and
in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to consider the case.
Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice to the project
proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which the SEAC has
recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
9
Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for Additional 2x600 MT Mounded Bullets
Vessels for LPG Bottling Plant at Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Indian Oil
Corporation Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for TOR subject to stipulation stated
therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Additional 2x600 MT Mounded Bullets
Vessels for LPG Bottling Plant at Gurgaon, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the SEIAA approved the
“Terms of Reference”. It was decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by
using Model Terms of Reference of MoEF & CC along with the following additional
terms of reference:
1. Public hearing to be conducted for the project as per provisions of Environmental
Impact assessment Notification, 2006 and the issues raised by the public should be
addressed in the Environmental Management plan.
2. The project proponent should obtain the permission from CGWA for use of
existing tube wells.
3. The project proponent should obtain the NOC under Aravali Notification, 1992
from District Collector, Gurgaon.
4. The project proponent should obtain the permission of expansion from the
competent authority.
5. The project proponent should obtain the NOC from the Director, Explosive.
6. The project proponent should submit one month fresh data of ambient air quality.
7. The project proponent should submit details of water body near the project site.
8. The project proponent should submit the proposal for strengthening of roads.
9. The project proponent should submit the effects of traffic on ambient air quality.
****
1
Minutes of the 102nd meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 20th April, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 243-245 dated 17.04.2017 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing colony at
village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 101st meeting of SEIAA held on 22.03.2017
and the Authority issued a notice to project proponent for the violation under
Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.
The project proponent on 06.04.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and
corroborated the reply with the report of visiting team of SEAC members.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and with the site visit report to accord Environment
Clearance to this project.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony
“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana by
M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 101st meeting of SEIAA held on 22.03.2017
and the Authority issued a notice to project proponent for the violation under
Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.
The project proponent on 06.04.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and
corroborated the reply with the report of visiting team of SEAC members.
After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and with the site visit report to accord Environment
Clearance to this project.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex project – Spaze
Buziness Park, Sector-66, Village- badshahpur, District-Gurgaon by
M/S KAY KAY Designer Towers Pvt. Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 101st meeting of SEIAA held on 22.03.2017
and the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 07.04.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed that the reply
2
of project proponent and found it to be satisfactory. Further Authority asked the project
proponent to submit an affidavit stating the followings:
[1] That the waste water from the cooling tower / filter back wash/or reject of RO or
softener would be treated and handled as per the guidelines issued by Pollution Control
Board/ MoEF & CC time to time
[2] That any permission required from any authority State or Centre for the
use/storage/transportation of diesel for DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent
oil would be handled as per the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and the project proponent directed to submit the above said undertakings/affidavits
satisfactory clarification within 15 days and will submit the copies to all the members of
SEIAA, after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Bio Medical Waste Management &
Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace
City-II, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vulcan Waste Management Pvt.
Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Bio Medical Waste
Management & Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace City-
II, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 4047 sqm. (1 Acres)
2. Total Capacity of
Plant
1. Incinerator
2. Autoclave
3. Shredder
20 tons/day
500 kg/hr
500 kg/batch
250 kg/hr
3. Estimated cost 2.50 crores
4. Power 90 KW (DHBVN)
5. Green belt 31.31%
6. Treated waste water
used for
Scrubbing, Gardening and Washing of Vehicles.
7. Water requirement 6 KLD
8. Fresh Water 2.7 KLD
9. Waste Water 3.5 KLD ETP 5 KLD
10. Solid Waste 10-15 kg/day
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. The Authority found that the project proponent has proposed to install
Incinerator technology is old and is not suitable in comparison of other alternative
technology available. Therefore, authority unanimously decided to ask the project
proponent to adopt the Plasma Pyrolysis or Gasification Technology for combustion of
bio-medical waste.
3
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent resubmit the proposal with
the proposed installation of latest technology i.e. Plasma Pyrolysis or Gasification
Technology as mentioned above. The project proponent must submit the plan to
handle/disposal of the ash thus generated and schematic plan to treat/handle the waste
water generated through the scrubber. The project proponent is further asked to submit
the copies of the same to the respective members of SEIAA within 15 days; if found to
align with the requirement the EC letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[5] Request for confirmation regarding exemption amendment in
Environment Clearance “EC” for our Residential Colony namely
“Parklands” falling in Sectors-82-88 & 89 by M/s Countrywide
Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
As per the amendment in the EIA Notification issued recently by Ministry of
Environment and Forest & Climate Change, Government of India on dated 09th
December, 2016, the construction projects having covered area more than 300000 Sq.
Meters falls under the competency of the Ministry of Environment and Forest & Climate
Change, Government of India.
In view of above, the Authority is of the unanimous view that this case is having
area 898150.71 Sq. Meters. Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up
area; as per notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC,
GoI.
Item No.[6] Environment Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project- EDGE
Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s S.A. Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016
and the case was referred back to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may clearly
define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of
construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection
report within stipulated period.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of
guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.
It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 11.03.2011 submitted
application for Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project- EDGE
Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana. The Authority
decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit
the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall
4
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above
within 15 days period.
Item No.[7] Environment Clearance for proposed Residential Area Development
Project at Sector-14-P-II and Sector-33 in Hisar by Office of the
Executive Engineer HUDA, Division No. II, Hisar.
As per the amendment in the EIA Notification issued recently by Ministry of
Environment and Forest & Climate Change, Government of India on dated 09th
December, 2016, the construction projects having covered area more than 300000 Sq.
Meters falls under the competency of the Ministry of Environment and Forest & Climate
Change, Government of India.
In view of above, the Authority is of the unanimous view that this case is having
area 849350.25 Sq. Meters. Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt of built up
area; as per notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC,
GoI.
Item No.[8] Environment Clearance Boulder Gravel and Sand Mino Mineral Mines
at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00 Ha. in District-Yamuna
Nagar by M/s Kawal Jeet Singh Batra, S/o Sh. Makhan Singh Batra
Building,
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the Boulder
Gravel and Sand Mino Mineral Mines at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00
Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
project proponent supplied the copies at the eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the
members of the Authority need some time to go through the project report. The Authority
unanimously decided to defer the case to the next meeting.
Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for mining of ‘Stone along with Associated
Minor Minerals’ in the revenue estate of Village Usmapur, District-
Mahendergarh, Haryana by M/s Astha Infra Developer Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for approval of TOR subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed mining of ‘Stone along
with Associated Minor Minerals’ in the revenue estate of Village Usmapur, District-
Mahendergarh, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it was
decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by using Model Terms of
Reference of MoEF & CC along with the following additional terms of reference:
1. Public hearing to be conducted for the project as per provisions of Environmental
Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and the issues raised by the public should
be addressed in the Environmental Management Plan.
5
2. The PP should submit an permission from competent authority regarding the
distance of the project site from the Inter-State boundary as crow fly distance.
3. Detail calculation of water requirement for various purposes with permissions.
4. Permission of Competent Authority (DGMS) regarding mine safety.
5. Impact of vibration due to use of explosive on surround area alongwith mitigating
measures.
6. No mining activity shall be conducted within 500 meters from any hydraulic
structure, bridges, pumping station etc.
7. Impact of movement of transportation for carrying mined material on Ambient
Air and surrounding area including traffic congestion on roads.
8. No mining activity shall be conducted within 250 meters from outer periphery of
major district roads, national highway, state highway and defined village abadi.
9. Impact on Ambient Air and mitigative measures for the same along with
appropriate plan.
10. Plan for controlling water pollution especially from domestic effluent.
11. Rain water harvesting proposal to be given in detail.
12. Replenishment study report in case of river sand gavel mining proposal.
13. Mining activity shall not change course of river/canal/other water bodies.
14. NOC from forest department for project site.
15. The PP shall comply with all guidelines of MOEF & CC and any orders passed by
Hon’ble Supreme Court/High Court/NGT.
16. NOC from wildlife.
17. Permission from Irrigation Department for sand mining from river/canal bed and
bund area.
18. Width of Bench shall never be less than bench height.
19. No mechanized mining shall be done vin river bed in view of orders of Hon’ble
NGT. No mining shall be done in river bed during monsoon period.
20. PP shall not exceed the production of mineral than the production figures
mentioned in approved mining plan.
21. Replenishment and drainage study from the reputed institution.
22. Impact of mining activity on adjacent agricultural land with particular reference to
run off, soil erosion and loss of top soil due to change in topography.
23. Details of Transportation of mined out materials as per the Indian Road Congress
for both the ways (loaded as well as unloaded trucks) load and its impact on
Environment.
24. Impact of all existing mining on the present land use in the study area.
25. The PP should submit compliance of all the conditions of Letter of Intent issued
by the Mines and Geology Department Haryana.
6
26. Details of excavation schedule & sequent8ial mining plan.
27. Monitoring of water quality and ground water level.
Item No.[10] Environment Clearance for construction of Expansion of Residential
Plotted Colony Project located at Sector-106, 108, 109 Vill Babupur
and Pawala Khusrupur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Chintels India Ltd.
As per the amendment in the EIA Notification issued recently by Ministry of
Environment and Forest & Climate Change, Government of India on dated 09th
December, 2016, the construction projects having covered area more than 300000 Sq.
Meters falls under the competency of the Ministry of Environment and Forest & Climate
Change, Government of India.
In view of above, the Authority is of the unanimous view that this case is having
area 553402.698 Sq. Meters. Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt of built up
area; as per notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC,
GoI.
Item No.[11] Environment Clearance for proposed 5 MLD Common Effluent
Treatment Plant (CETP) at HSIIDC, Village Saha, District-Ambala,
Haryana by HSIIDC,
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for proposed 5
MLD Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) at HSIIDC, Village Saha, District-
Ambala, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed
that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of document to the members of
Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to
consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice
to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which
the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[12] Environment Clearance for Expansion & Modernization by (Combining
two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development project (3.2312
acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas,
District Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Arnon Builder and Developers
Limited.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for Expansion &
Modernization by (Combining two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development
project (3.2312 acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas, District
Gurgaon Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed
that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of document to the members of
Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to
consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice
to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which
7
the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[13] Environment Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at
Village Wazirpur, Sec-95A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Forever
Builtech Private Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Affordable Group
Housing Project at Village Wazirpur, Sec-95A, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 32512 sqm
2. Built up area 69345.861 sqm
3. License Valid up 25.09.2021
4. Nos. of Towers 11 Towers, G/S + 13 Floors, Commercial
convenient shopping, community,
Anganwadi
5. Dwelling units 1101 total DU
6. Height 44.485 Meter
7. Green belt 20.03%
8. Water requirement 833 KLD
9. Fresh Water 537 KLD
10. Waste Water 693 KLD
11 STP Capacity 830 KLD
12. Power Requirement 5250 KVA DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 2927.28 kg/day
14. ECS 564 ECS + 1962 Two wheeler
15. RWH 19 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting and the Authority studied and discussed in detail and found the
following observations:
Water balance Chart
The project proponent has replied on 30/03/2017 to the query “PP should submit
revised fresh water requirement as per MoEF norms” raised by SEAC during its
147th meeting held on 30/01/2017. The project proponent has not incorporated the
recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as given in Table
2.4. Thus, project proponent is asked to incorporate the same and resubmit the
water balance diagram.
The project proponent has asked for 30 KLD for “Filter Back wash” that too
“Fresh water” ; as such PP is asking for 2 KLD for cooling tower & 30KLD for
filter back wash; anomaly, must substantiate with proper calculations & reference.
PP must use treated water for “Filter Backwash”. How is it feasible that the
cooling tower is requiring only 2 KLD of treated water and the associated filter
needs 30 KLD for its washing, explain?
8
The project proponent has shown that 2 KLD of water is required for DG set
cooling; location of cooling tower, schematic plan to treat the inlet & outlet water
of cooling tower and handling of rejects; not shown.
The project proponent should submit “Water Balance Chart” for different seasons
after making the necessary amendments.
Form 1A
Pt. 8.1 / 9.1/9.5/9.6 not explained properly
Pt. 8.3; stating Fly-ash would be used in road construction, how would fly-ash be
procured, stored & used? Elaborate properly
The project proponent may submit undertaking that the waste water from the
cooling tower / filter back wash/or reject of RO or softener would be treated and
handled as per the guidelines issued by Pollution Control Board/ MoEF & CC
time to time
The project proponent may submit an undertaking stating that any permission
required from any authority State or Centre for the use/storage/transportation of
diesel for DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent oil would be handled as
per the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[14] Environment Clearance for Affordable Housing project at Sector-36,
Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sternal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Affordable Housing
project at Sector-36, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 39557.959 sqm
2. Built up area 93558.666 sqm
3. License Valid up 25.09.2021
4. Nos. of Towers 13 Towers, GF + 14 Floors, Commercial
convenient shopping, community hall/
building, Anganwadi
5. Height 44.70 Meter
6. Green belt 22.9%
7. Water requirement 977 KLD
8. Fresh Water 601 KLD
9
9. Waste Water 803 KLD
10. STP Capacity 960 KLD
11 Power Requirement 6160 KVA DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 3612 kg/day
13. ECS 656 ECS
14. RWH 13 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting and the Authority studied and discussed in detail and found the
following observations:
Water balance Chart
The project proponent has replied on 30/03/2017 to the query “PP should submit
revised fresh water requirement as per MoEF norms” raised by SEAC during its
147th meeting held on 30/01/2017. The project proponent has not incorporated the
recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as given in Table
2.4. Thus, project proponent is asked to incorporate the same and resubmit the
water balance diagram.
The project proponent has shown that 3.45 KLD of water is required for DG set
cooling; location of cooling tower, schematic plan to treat the inlet & outlet water
of cooling tower and handling of rejects; not shown
The project proponent should submit “Water Balance Chart” for different seasons
after making the necessary amendments.
Form 1A
Pt. 8.1 & 9.1 not explained properly
Pt. 8.3; stating Fly-ash would be used in road construction, how would fly-ash be
procured, stored & used? Elaborate properly
What type of “APCM” or any other equipment will be installed to arrest the
fugitive particles may be emitting during the use of Fly-ash
PP may submit undertaking that the waste water from the cooling tower / filter
back wash/or reject of RO or softener would be treated and handled as per the
guidelines issued by Pollution Control Board/ MoEF & CC time to time
The project proponent may submit an undertaking stating that any permission
required from any authority State or Centre for the use/storage/transportation of
diesel for DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent oil would be handled as
per the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
10
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[15] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Sarvodaya
Hospital & Research Centre (A Unit of Anshu Hospital Ltd.) At Site
No. 1, Sector-08 at Faridabad by M/s Anshu Hospitals Limited.
The SEAC was taken up this case for appraisal in the 149th meeting held on
31.03.2017and recommended to SEIAA for clarification whether this case is to be
considered as that of violation or not.
In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority decided to call
the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next
meeting to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.
Item No.[16] Environment Clearance for river Bed Mining Project of Minor
Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of
12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-
Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Gobindpur Royalty Company.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the river Bed
Mining Project of Minor Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of
12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana
was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The project proponent supplied the
copies at the eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the members of the Authority need some
time to go through the project report. The Authority unanimously decided to defer the
case to the next meeting.
Item No.[17] Environment Clearance for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor
Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3” District:
Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Jai Dada Dohla Stone Mines.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the Stone
Mine along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No.
3” District: Bhiwani, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
project proponent supplied the copies at the eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the
members of the Authority need some time to go through the project report. The Authority
unanimously decided to defer the case to the next meeting.
Item No.[18] Environment Clearance for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor
Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 2” District:
Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Pioneer Partners.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the Stone
Mine along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No.
11
2” District: Bhiwani, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The
project proponent supplied the copies at the eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the
members of the Authority need some time to go through the project report. The Authority
unanimously decided to defer the case to the next meeting.
Item No.[19] Environment Clearance for proposed “Stone Along with Associated
Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B 1,
Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha by
M/s SBIPL Projects Limited.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the “Stone
Along with Associated Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B
1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The project proponent supplied the copies at the
eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the members of the Authority need some time to go
through the project report. The Authority unanimously decided to defer the case to the
next meeting.
Item No.[20] Environment Clearance for proposed expansion of Clinker Grinding
Unit (1.5 to 2.5 Million TPA) along with installation of Captive Power
Plant (10 MW) near village Khukhrana, P.O.Assan Kalan, District-
Panipat (Haryana) by M/s Shree Cement Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to file this case as withdrawal in its 150th meeting
held on 06.04.2017 as per the request by the project proponent.
In the today’s meeting the Authority as gone through the case and related facts,
therefore the Authority asked project proponent to submit an affidavit stating that there
will not be any Capacity enhancement in the Clinker Grinding Unit and no proposed
captive Power plant would be installed. Further, the pp has been asked to submit the units
of power consumed in the financial year 2014-15 and 2015-16.
Item No.[21] Environment Clearance for IT/ITES SEZ Project located at Village
Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Distt-Gurgaon by M/s Mikado Realtors
Pvt. Ltd.
As per the amendment in the EIA Notification issued recently by Ministry of
Environment and Forest & Climate Change, Government of India on dated 09th
December, 2016, the construction projects having covered area more than 300000 Sq.
Meters falls under the competency of the Ministry of Environment and Forest & Climate
Change, Government of India.
In view of above, the Authority is of the unanimous view that this case is having
area 528188.60 Sq. Meters. Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt of built up
12
area; as per notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC,
GoI.
Item No.[22] Environment Clearance for 25 MLD Common Effluent Treatment
Plant (CETP) for Phase III and IV along with up gradation from 15
MLD to 30 KLD CETP for Phase I and II located at Industrial Model
Township, Manesar, Haryana by M/s Haryana State Industrial and
Infrastructure Development corporation Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for approval of TOR subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for 25 MLD Common
Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) for Phase III and IV along with up gradation from 15
MLD to 30 KLD CETP for Phase I and II located at Industrial Model Township,
Manesar, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it was
decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by using Model Terms of
Reference of MoEF & CC.
Item No.[23] Environment Clearance for Group Housing colony project at Sector-
82A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vatika Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Group Housing colony
project at Sector-82A, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 45397.5633 sqm (11.218 Acres)
2. Built up area 43862.113 sqm
3. License Valid up 23.03.2017 (invalid)
4. Nos. of Towers 3 Towers (1 High rise tower + 2 mid rise
tower), 2 Basements + GF + Max. 39
Floors,
5. DU 169 Main Units, 122 EWS Units,
Convenient shopping area.
6. Height 136.5 Meter
7. Green belt 32.32%
8. Water requirement 296 KLD
9. Fresh Water 136 KLD
10. Waste Water 178 KLD
11 STP Capacity 220 KLD
12. Power Requirement 4045.50 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 786 kg/day (2 nos. of OWC i.e. 500 kg/day
& 100 kg/day)
14. ECS 407 ECS
13
15. RWH 11 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting and the Authority studied in detail and discussed that the license was
valid till 23.03.2017. The case has been referred back to SEAC with the suggestion to
visit the site to verify any construction or violation of environmental norms and asked to
submit the report within 15 days .
ItemNo.[24]Environment Clearance for expansion of existing
IndustrialWarehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari,
Tehsil & Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana by M/s HCY Industrial Park Pvt. Ltd.
The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the expansion
of existing IndustrialWarehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari, Tehsil &
Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was
noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the
members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the
Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting
with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the
basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.
Item No.[25] Environment Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Project
“Lavanya Apartments” at Sector-81, Village Nawada Fatehpur,
Gurgaon by M/s Graphic Research Consultants (India) Pvt . Ltd.
The SEAC was considered this case in its 150th meeting held on 06.04.2017.
During discussion, it was revealed that project proponent has already started the
construction without obtaining prior environmental clearance which amounts to violation
of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. The fact apparently was brought before the
Committee on reference to the project proposal.
The Committee again went through the latest Notification dated 14.03.2017
relating to Consideration of proposals for ToRs/Environment Clearance involving
violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986/Environment Impact
Assessment(EIA) Notification, 2006 which clearly states that in case the project or
activities required prior Environmental Clearance under Environmental Impact
Assessment Notification, 2006 from the concerned Regulatory Authority are brought for
Environmental Clearance after starting the construction work, or have undertaking
expansion, modernization and change in product mix without prior Environmental
Clearance , these projects shall be treated as cases of violation and in such cases, even
14
Category B projects which are granted environmental clearance by the State Environment
Impact Assessment Authority constituted under sub-section(3) of section 3 of the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 shall be apprised for grant of environmental
clearance only by the Expert Appraisal Committee and the Environmental Clearance will
be granted at the Central level.
In the today’s meeting the Authority decided that this case may be sent to MoEF
& CC, GoI as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017.
Item No.[26] Environment Clearance for proposed Modernization with process
integration of existing herbal extracts and their purified derivatives
for manufacturing of herbal extracts and active pharmaceuticals
ingredients (capacity 320 kg/day) at Village Kaili, Tehsil-Ballabgarh,
Dist-Faridabad, Haryana by Alchem International Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for approval of TOR subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Modernization with
process integration of existing herbal extracts and their purified derivatives for
manufacturing of herbal extracts and active pharmaceuticals ingredients (capacity 320
kg/day) at Village Kaili, Tehsil-Ballabgarh, Dist-Faridabad, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it was
decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by using Model Terms of
Reference of MoEF & CC.
*******
1
Minutes of the 103rd meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 17th May, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter
No. 317-319 dated 12.05.2017 were discussed following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1]Environment Clearance Boulder Gravel and Sand Miner Mineral Mines
at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00 Ha. in District-Yamuna
Nagar by M/s Kawal Jeet Singh Batra, S/o Sh. Makhan Singh Batra
Building.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Boulder
Gravel and Sand Miner Mineral Mines at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00
Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar as under:
1. The project proponent submitted application on 06.01.2017 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 149th meeting held on 31.03.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Boulder Gravel
and Sand Minor Mineral Mines at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00
Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar for a period of 08 years vide letter dated
20.10.2016.
4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
5. The proposed production is 4,40, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water requirement
is 20 KLD.
6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 913 for first year saplings and 633
every year for 4 years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Pt. 5.2/5.5 of Form1-A; fugitive emission expected during loading of mineral
cannot be controlled by simply spraying water on the haul road. PP must elaborate
concrete measures to suppress/arrest the fugitive emissions caused due to
handling/loading of mineral.
[2] Pt.7.1;Form 1, spent oil/hydraulic oil/lubricating oil or grease/diesel would be
required to run various machines employed at the site utmost care has to be taken
2
not to let such oils spill over the mining area or nearby being closer to river bed.
What precautions/means PP do propose?
[3] Loaded vehicles would be plying, dust particles under the wheels would be
repeatedly crushed & getting finer & finer giving rise to Air Pollution. Elaborate
the plan to take care of this aspect.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
Item No.[2] Environment Clearance for proposed 5 MLD Common Effluent
Treatment Plant (CETP) at HSIIDC, Village Saha, District-Ambala,
Haryana by HSIIDC.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance under
category 7(h) of EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The Project Proponent has proposed
project 05 MLD CETP is located in Industrial Growth Center, Saha District Ambala,
Haryana. The total developed area Industrial Growth Centre Saha is 610 acres (Phase-I -
410.36 acers and Phase-II 250.94 acers), out of which 5.59 Acres of land is allotted for
the CETP in Sector 2 of Phase-I. HSIIDC has planned to setup 10 MLD Common
Effluent Treatment Plant for its member industries in two modules 05 MLD each.
Total green belt provided within the CETP area is 73.2% i.e.16540.45 Sqmt. The
greenbelt in entire industrial growth center is 85.55 ha i.e. 34.55 %. Plantation
(periphery): 12253.57 Sqmt, plantation along road & berms: 277375.69 Sqmt, Lawn area
is 192642.48 Sqmt. and within the industrial plot: 373216.65 Sqmt. The units in this
Industrial Growth Center are mostly green and orange category and are less water
intensive. The major types of industries are Food & processing industries and scientific
industries. The treatment system involves Primary Treatment (Fine Screening, Grit
Removal, Oil Removal and Equalization), Physico Chemical Treatment , Secondary
Treatment (Activated Sludge Process- Extended Aeration), and finally treatment will be
done Dual Media filter followed by Chlorination in Chlorine Contact Tank the resultant
solid waste generated will be sent to authorized TSDF site. The power requirement is 440
KVA supplied from Haryana State Electricity Board (HSEB). In case of power failure
160 KVA DG sets are proposed as power backup.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord
Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.
3
Item No.[3] Environment Clearance for Expansion & Modernization by (Combining
two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development project (3.2312
acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas, District
Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Arnon Builder and Developers Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Expansion &
Modernization by (Combining two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development project
(3.2312 acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas, District Gurgaon
Haryana as under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 27086.42 sqm (6.6932 Acres)
2. Built up area 95834.398 sqm
3. License Valid up to 22.10.2016 & 07/01/16 (Invalid
license)
4. Nos. of Towers 2 Basements Office Building, Retails/Shops,
Food Court
5. Height 58.625 Meter
6. Green belt 25.64%
7. Water requirement 343 KLD
8. Fresh Water 174 KLD
9. Waste Water 160 KLD
10. STP Capacity 200 KLD
11 Power Requirement 5938.38 KW DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 1421 kg/day
13. ECS 1043 ECS
14. RWH 05 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation
etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Provision for make-up water of water Body is on higher side
[2] 135 KLD Water required for Cooling Towers; Location of cooling towers on the
lay-out plan?
[3] The fig. of 135 KLD may be substantiated by some calculations.
[4] PP has proposed to use 64 KLD of Fresh Water for Cooling Towers ; water being
a scarce resource, for Cooling & Horticulture purposes PP is being asked to use
“Treated Water” only
(i) There would be water loss due to evaporation, drifting etc. in the cooling
towers installed for DG or HVAC but the entire water present in circuit will
not vanish residual quantity will remain in the circuit, thereby, increase in
dissolved salts and increase in hardness. PP may depict how would this
water be treated or rejects be handled?
4
(ii) PP be asked to incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use
Reduction” as in table 2.4
(iii) PP be asked to resubmit the “Water Balance charts” for different seasons
after making the suggested amendments
(iv) PP may submit undertaking that the waste water from the cooling tower /
filter back wash/or reject of RO or softener would be treated and handled as
per the guidelines issued by Pollution Control Board/ MoEF&CC time to
time and PP would be using only “Treated water” for Cooling/Horticulture
purposes
(v) PP may submit an undertaking stating that any permission required from
any authority State or Centre for the use/storage/transportation of diesel for
DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent oil would be handled as per
the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard
[5] Licence was valid up to 22/10/16 (annex.-7) & other up to 07/01/16; any
explanation.
[6] Pt.8.1/9.1(assumed Energy consumption per sq. foot of built-up area)/9.5/9.6/9.7
of Form1-a be explained properly).
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the
above raised observation within 15 days period and Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. A.K.Bhatia
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report of
compliance of conditions imposed in the existing environment clearances letter.
Item No.[4] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Sarvodaya Hospital
& Research Centre (A Unit of Anshu Hospital Ltd.) At Site No. 1,
Sector-08 at Faridabad by M/s Anshu Hospitals Limited.
The case was considered in the 102nd meeting after the detailed deliberation the
authority decided to call the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in
person in the next meeting to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the
next meeting.
The case was considered in the today’s meeting and the Authorized representative
appeared in the meeting to present their case. The Authority decided that Sh. A. K. Bhatia
and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for fact finding and spot
inspection. The visiting team should also verify the various compliances of conditions of
environmental clearance.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the
site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days period.
5
Item No.[5] Environment Clearance for river Bed Mining Project of Minor Mineral
Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of 12,78,000 TPA at
Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana by
M/s Gobindpur Royalty Company.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for River Bed
Mining Project of Minor Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of
12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana
as under.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 27.11.2015 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 150th meeting held on 06.04.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by river Bed Mining
Project of Minor Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of
12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula,
Haryana for a period of 10 years vide letter dated 09.06.2015.
4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
5. The proposed production is 12, 78,000 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 12.74 KLD.
6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 468 plants saplings for every year for
5 years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Pt. 5.2/5.3/5.5 of Form 1; Simply by sprinkling of water dust generated due to
plying of vehicles or loading/unloading & transportation of mineral may not be
suppressed effectively.Elaborate the plan to take care of this aspect
[2] Spent oil/hydraulic oil/lubricating oil or grease/diesel would be required to run
various machines employed at the site utmost care has to be taken not to let such
oils spill over the mining area or nearby being closer to river bed. What
precautions/means PP do propose?
[3] Loaded vehicles would be plying, dust particles under the wheels would be
repeatedly crushed & getting finer & finer giving rise to Air Pollution. Elaborate
the plan to take care of this aspect
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
6
Item No.[6] Environment Clearance for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor
Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3” District:
Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Jai Dada Dohla Stone Mines.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Stone Mine
along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3”
District: Bhiwani, Haryana as under:
1. The project proponent submitted application on 11.05.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 134th meeting held on 31.05.2016 approved the TOR for EIA
study. The public hearing was held on 06.03.2017. The study period October to
31 December 2016.
3. The SEAC in its 150th meeting held on 06.04.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
4. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Mines and
Geology Department Haryana for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor
Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3” District: Bhiwani,
Haryana for a period of 10 years vide letter dated 11.04.2016.
5. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
6. The proposed production is 21, 00, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 20.00 KLD.
7. The project proponent has proposed to plant 600 saplings every year for first 5
years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord
Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.
Item No.[7] Environment Clearance for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor
Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 2” District:
Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Pioneer Partners.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Stone Mine
along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 2”
District: Bhiwani, Haryana as under :
1. The project proponent submitted application on 11.05.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 134th meeting held on 31.05.2016 approved the TOR for EIA
study. The public hearing was held on 06.03.2017. The study period October to
31 December 2016.
7
3. The SEAC in its 150th meeting held on 06.04.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
4. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Mines and
Geology Department Haryana for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor
Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 2” District: Bhiwani,
Haryana for a period of 10 years vide letter dated 11.04.2016.
5. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
6. The proposed production is 33, 50, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 24.00 KLD.
7. The project proponent has proposed to plant 1125 saplings every year for first 5
years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord
Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.
Item No.[8] Environment Clearance for proposed “Stone Along with Associated
Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B 1,
Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha by
M/s SBIPL Projects Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for “Stone
Along with Associated Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B
1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha as under:
1. The project proponent submitted application on 11.05.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 134th meeting held on 31.05.2016 approved the TOR for EIA
study. The public hearing was held on 06.03.2017. The study period October to
31 December 2016.
3. The SEAC in its 150th meeting held on 06.04.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
4. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Mines and
Geology Department Haryana for Stone Along with Associated Minor Mineral”
Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B 1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-
Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha for a period of 10 years vide letter
dated 11.04.2016.
5. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from
Forest Department.
6. The proposed production is 56, 00, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water
requirement is 32 KLD.
8
7. The project proponent has proposed to plant 1250 saplings every year for first 5
years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord
Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.
Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for proposed expansion of Clinker Grinding
Unit (1.5 to 2.5 Million TPA) along with installation of Captive Power
Plant (10 MW) near village Khukhrana, P.O.Assan Kalan, District-
Panipat (Haryana) by M/s Shree Cement Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to file this case as withdrawal in its 150th meeting
held on 06.04.2017 as per the request by the project proponent.
The case was considered in the 102nd meeting in the SEIAA. The Authority as
gone through the case and related facts, therefore the Authority asked project proponent
to submit an affidavit stating that there will not be any Capacity enhancement in the
Clinker Grinding Unit and no proposed captive Power plant would be installed. Further,
the pp has been asked to submit the units of power consumed in the financial year 2014-
15 and 2015-16.
The Project proponent has failed to submit the asked undertaking/documents so
the case has been deferred.
ItemNo.[10] Environment Clearance for expansion of existing Industrial
Warehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari, Tehsil &
Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana by M/s HCY Industrial Park Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for expansion
of existing Industrial Warehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari, Tehsil
& Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana as under:
Sr.
No.
Particular Existing
(sqmt)
Revision
(sqmt)
Expansion
(sqmt)
Total (EC Accorded +
Revision) (sqmt)
1 Total Plot Area 103271.20 s 109593.29
(27.08 Acres)
2 Built up Area 56269.92 4758.68 5373.78 63159.6
3 Blocks 6 Blocks
B500, B600,
B700, B800,
B900, B1000
1 block (B600
& B700 will
be combined
together and
termed as
B750)
5 Blocks
B500, B750, B800,
B900, B1000
4 Total Water 76 KLD
5 Fresh Water 17. KLD
7 Waste Water 49 KLD
8 STP 130 KLD
9 RWH 25 pits 1 pits 26 pits
10 Parking 619 ECS 39 ECS 658 ECS
11 Power Req. 1500 KVA 1500 KVA
9
12 Solid Waste 300 KG/day 300 /day
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Fresh water requirement 17 KLD + treated water requirement 59KLD = 76 KLD
of total water requirement; check the calculations on the presentation.
[2] PP has been asked to resubmit the revised “Water Balance Chart” in the 150th
Meeting of SEAC held on 06/04/17.
[3] PP resubmitted its reply & raised the “Fresh water” demand to 57 KLD; why?
Initially, PP proposed to use 24 KLD of “Treated water” for horticulture out of
which 21KLD (pg.no.17 of presentation)was planned to be taken from other sources, a
much better plan to save water. But in the reply submitted 39KLD Fresh water + 9 KLD
Treated water= 48 KLD of water for horticulture, why so? Water being a scarce resource
and all be done to conserve, therefore, instead of Fresh water treated water be used, as
proposed earlier, for Horticulture.
[4] PP be asked to incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use
Reduction” as in table 2.4
[5] PP be asked to resubmit the “Water Balance charts” for different seasons after
making the suggested amendments
[6] STP process flow diagram; PP proposed to use Softener for the removal of water
hardness but not shown how the rejects/residue would be handled?
[7] Revisit the reply to pt.8.3 of Form 1A; Clean Wood or Portland Cement are not
“Recyclable or Recycled” material
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of
SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory
clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the
project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA
and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.
ItemNo.[11] Environmental Clearance for “Recreation and Leisure Project” in
village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S DLF Limited.
The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016.
The Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri
Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the
report. The committee has submitted the site visit report on 24.04.2017. The site visit
report submitted by the committee is as under:
10
Site Visit Report
The Project proponent has submitted the details of the project and reason for its
delay in construction which is annexed as Annexure-P. As per this annexure, DLF
obtained 350.75 acres of land in village Wazirabad, Gurgaon from HSIIDC, Haryana.
Out of total land area of 350.75 acres, the area under section 4 and/or of 5 of Punjab Land
Preservation Act (PLPA, 1900) is 91.97 acre, the area under Aravalli plantation scheme is
161.03 are and the balance area is 92.72 acre. The PP did not pursue the EC of the project
because the matter of allotment of land was sub-judice in the court. The PP has confirmed
in their report through affidavit that no construction has been done at site (Annex-3).
The sub-committee visited the site of proposed project on 24.02.2017. The project
site is surrounded by DLF Golf and Country Club on the north, Gurgaon-Faridabad road
on east and DLF City Phase-V group housing on the west. Map showing the project site
and surrounding area is enclosed as Annexure-2 of PP report. The project site is densely
forested with undulated terrain and is a part of the Aravalli hills which recharges the
ground water. The committee did not find any construction on the site.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and finding no reason to
disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the Authority decided to de-list this
case. It was also decided that the decision of the Authority should be conveyed to the
Project Proponent and copy of the same be forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution
Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O. MOEF, GOI for information and necessary
action.
ItemNo.[12] Environmental Clearance for National Cancer Institute, AIIMS,
Jhajjar, Haryana by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS).
The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016.
The Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri
Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the
report. The committee has submitted the site visit report on 24.04.2017. The site visit
report submitted by the committee is as under:
Site Visit Report
MoEF vide letter no. F.No. 21-108/2015-IA.III dated 15th July, 2015 has issued
Environmental Clearance (EC) of this project, which has been attached as annexure-1,
therefore no site inspection is required in this case. Hence, no EC violation has been done
in this case.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and decided to file this case as
the environment clearance has been granted by MoEF & CC, GoI.
11
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for proposed Expansion of Miri Piri
Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Campus at Shahbab
markanda, Kurukshetra, Haryana by M/S Miri Piri Institute of
Medical Sciences & Research (Charitbale Trust).
The case was taken up in the 151st meeting of the SEAC held on 02.05.2017.
During discussions, it was observed by the Committee, that project proponent has not
obtained CLU from the competent authority which is a mandatory document as per
Checklist. Earlier also the SEAC has directed M/s Miri Piri Institute to submit the CLU
but the same has not been submitted so far. The case was not appraised by the SEAC, as
no other case without CLU from the competent authority was appraised by the SEAC so
far. The Committee is of the unanimous view that the case may be forwarded to SEIAA
for necessary advice in this matter.
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting and the Authority refer back this case to the SEAC with the advice that
the case should be appraised after the submission of proper CLU by the project
proponent.
Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony Project at Vill-
Badshahpur, Sector-67, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Khanna
Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for
Commercial Colony Project at Vill- Badshahpur, Sector-67, Gurgaon, Haryana as
under:
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 7826.608 sqm (1.934 Acres)
2. Built up area 25530.849 sqm
3. License Valid up to 27.08.2016 further applied for renewal
of the license
4. Nos. of Towers 3 Basements + GF+9 Floors, Service apartments
and Retails area.
5. Height 42.6 Meter
6. Green belt 26.27% (1846.764 sqmt)
Greenbelt plantation 328.593 + Green Lawn area
495.635 + Avenue Plantation area 710.804 +
Peripheral Plantation area 311.732 sqm.
7. Water
requirement
194 KLD
8. Fresh Water 130 KLD
9. Waste Water 70.3024 KLD
10. STP Capacity 85 KLD
11 Power
Requirement
5000 KVA DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 266.31 kg/day (1 no. of OWC 250 kg/day)
13. ECS 324 ECS
14. RWH 03 pits
12
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of
water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-
involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,
parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
[1] Pg.No. 40, 9.12 of Form 1-A states that “The Project will not be “Centrally air-
conditioned” and pt. 9.7 does not elaborate on whether proposed chillers would be
CFC&HCFC free, not states “Assumed load of Air-conditioning” & the
specifications, all this leads to the assumption that no “Air-conditioning system” is
proposed. At the same time Fig.2(a)pg.no.52 depicts requirement of 100KLD
water for “Cooling Towers” of HVAC system. Both are in contradiction, explain
[2] Location of Cooling towers of HVAC & DG sets on the lay-out plan
HVAC Cooling
[3] 100KLD= 95KLD Fresh water + 5 KLD Treated Water; 75 KLD would be re-
circulated (as per Fig.2a), what type of arrangement PP is planning to install to
treat the re-circulating water? How would the rejects/residue thus obtained be
handled? Submit a schematic plan
[4] As per Fig.2a 20 KLD will be lost in evaporation/drifting etc.; means 20 KLD is
required for “Replenishment”; the make-up demand should be met with “Treated
Water” not “Fresh Water”
[5] Secondly, as per Fig.2a 75KLD is always in circuit then why demand of 130 KL
of fresh water that too on daily basis ?
[6] 8 KLD of treated water is required for Cooling Tower of DG sets, capacity of both
the DG sets is 750KVA, can be air-cooled and precious water can be saved.
[7] In case of Cooling Tower of DG sets the major quantity of water is lost due to
evaporation which leads to increase in quantity of “Dissolved salts” rendering it
difficult for further use without being properly treated. PP is being asked to submit
Schematic plan depicting the method of treating this water; reducing the hardness
and how to handle rejects/residue being thus obtained?
[8] Water Balance Chart declares “Zero Liquid Discharge”, how is it practically
feasible? For example, 8 KLD of water is demanded for Cooling Towers of DG
sets; this requirement of water is directly proportional to running of DG sets which
are for stand-by purposes. PP has assumed availability of power 18hrs a day;
somehow if power is available for more than 18 hrs means DG sets would run less
than 6hrs/day needing less water for cooling, means the extra quantity of Treated
Water would be there, where this extra quantity would lead to?
[9] Fig.3(a); Water Balance Chart for “Winter season”, water demand has been
reduced by 3 KLD as horticulture would be requiring less water. Logically &
13
practically, the quantity of water required for Cooling Towers in winter should be
less but PP has maintained it at 100KLD = 92KLD Fresh + 8KLD treated water.
[10] 4000lts per day for Filter Back-wash; after washing this water will remain there
only, what is being proposed to “Treat” this water & how to handle the
rejects/residue thus being obtained?
[11] How much is diesel required for 6hrs a day operation of DG sets? Its storage,
necessary permissions & the safety measures to be installed or taken care
[12] Pt. 8.1/9.1/9.5/9.6/9.7 of Form 1-A to be explained properly
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above
raised observation within 15 days.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for API Manufacturing Project “Kaiser
Life” located at Village Dabkauri, Tehsil & Distt. Panchkula,
Haryana by M/s Kaiser life.
The SEAC has recommended this project for approval of TOR subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for API Manufacturing
Project “Kaiser Life” located at Village Dabkauri, Tehsil & Distt. Panchkula, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it was
decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by using Model Terms of
Reference of MoEF & CC with additional specific conditions as under:
1. The PP should submit total CO2 emission from the project.
2. The PP should submit online analyses for air emission and for the ETP.
Item No.[16] Extension from renewal of Environment Clearance for “Freedom
Park Life” Group Housing, Sector-57, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Countrywide Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended this project for deciding the Environment Clearance
case as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017. SEIAA may take a final view in the
matter.
In the today’s meeting after detailed deliberation the authority decided to call the
authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next meeting
to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.
*******
1
Minutes of the 104thmeeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on.
21st June, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman,
SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula,
regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.
The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for
Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No.
394-396 dated 13.06.2017 were discussed following decisions were taken:-
Item No.[1] Environment Clearance for proposed expansion of Clinker Grinding Unit
(1.5 to 2.5 Million TPA) along with installation of Captive Power Plant (10
MW) near village Khukhrana, P.O.Assan Kalan, District-Panipat
(Haryana) by M/s Shree Cement Ltd.
The SEAC has recommended to file this case as withdrawal in its 150th meeting held on
06.04.2017 as per the request by the project proponent.
The case was lastly considered in the 102nd meeting in the SEIAA. The Authority as gone
through the case and related facts, therefore the Authority asked project proponent to submit an
affidavit stating that there will not be any Capacity enhancement in the Clinker Grinding Unit
and no proposed captive Power plant would be installed. Further, the pp has been asked to
submit the units of power consumed in the financial year 2014-15 and 2015-16.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 24.05.2017 which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to accept the recommendation of
SEAC for withdrawal of the application as requested by project proponent.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio Medical Waste
Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, Village
BazidaJatan, near railway crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal, Haryana by
M/s. Haat Supreme Wastech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” in its 100th meeting held on 01.03.2017
and also decided that the project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and
regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR studies.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 01.05.2017 which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and the
authority listened patiently to the representative of the project proponent and accepted all the
documents submitted at the time of hearing. Authority needs some more time to study and
discuss the submissions made by project proponent. Therefore, the case has been deferred.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste
Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1 kite. No
50, Tadadi No 314, village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala, District
Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Esskay Hygienic Services.
The SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” in its 100th meeting held on 01.03.2017
and also decided that the project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and
regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR studies.
The project proponent submitted the reply on 01.05.2017 which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and the
authority listened patiently to the representative of the project proponent and accepted all the
2
documents submitted at the time of hearing. Authority needs some more time to study and
discuss the submissions made by project proponent. Therefore, the case has been deferred.
Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste
Treatment Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz KaMeo Industrial area,
Sohna, Mewat, Haryana by Synergy Waste Management Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” in its 100th meeting held on 01.03.201.
The project proponent submits the representation on 01.05.2017 which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and the
authority listened patiently to the representative of the project proponent and accepted all the
documents submitted at the time of hearing. Authority needs some more time to study and
discuss the submissions made by project proponent. Therefore, the case has been deferred.
Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex at
Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bluejays Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 101st meeting after the detailed deliberation the Authority
decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as
indicated above within 15 days period. The site visit report submitted by the committee is as
under:
Site Visit Report
The sub-committee inspected the site on dated 06.05.2017 in presence of the
representative of the project and the matter was discussed with them about the status of site. The
following activities were observed by the sub-committee:
1. On one side there was old RCC wall which was separating the premises of adjoining
HSIIDC land from the project area. From the local enquiry it revealed that this wall was
constructed by HSIIDC since long.
2. A temporary sign board was installed by PP outside the project area for advertisement of
the project.
3. A temporary port cabin (guard room cum office) of 20X15 ft was erected in the project
area for stay of guards at the site. It was informed by the PP that this will be dismantled
as soon as the construction work will start at site.
4. Some excavation was seen along the plot which was done by the local administration to
lay the water supply pipe line.
5. No construction activity related to the approved building plan was observed.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and finding no reason to disagree
with recommendations of SEAC in this case the Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also
decided that the decision of the Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy
of the same be forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana &
R.O. MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.
3
Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony Project at Vill-
Badshahpur, Sector-67, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Khanna Developers
Pvt. Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 103rd meeting of SEIAA held on 17.05.2017 and
the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 29.05.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply. It was observed
by the Authority that still some clarifications are needed about the following:
Reply to Query no. 3
“The re-circulating water doesn't require any further treatment. Tolerance level of any cooling
tower as per manufacturing is 5O ppm. Whereas, we are proposing to achieve zero ppm hardness
in treated water which will be used in the cooling tower.When the hardness increases to 50 ppm
due to constant evaporation process. Then this water will be drained out to softener feed tank for
further reduction of hardness by treating through softener”.
Explain the above submission made by project proponent.
The query was “How would you be treating the water to make it fit for HVAC cooling tower?”
What is being construed of the above statement is if TDS of circulating water increases beyond
50 ppm, it will be treated by softener. Even the fresh water has more than 50 ppm of TDS and
that was the query, this water will be passed through softener or some other device, which are
those &what is the plan to handle the rejects & residue ? Submit the Schematic Diagram
Reply to Query 4
4 KLD for Filter back-wash, very much in excess & back-washing cannot be a daily
practice
Reply to Query 6
“Moreover the water used is treated water from STP and not fresh water and water is
continuously under re-circulation with provision of makeup water only, hence there is no
wastage”.
If there is no wastage & water is continuously in circulation then why 8000 Lts of water
is required on daily basis?
Reply to Query 7
“The water piping is designed to take care of maintaining the residue, however please note the
treated water is under continuous circulation during the working hours of the DG sets”
Please explain the design of piping & how is it maintaining the residue?
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to
the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC
letter shall be issued.
4
Item No.[7] Extension from renewal of Environment Clearance for “Freedom Park Life”
Group Housing, Sector-57, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Countrywide
Promoters Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the last meeting andthe authority decided to call the authorized
representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next meeting to justify their
claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting in the presence of the representative of
the project proponent wherein the main issue was raised with respect to the component of Green
area in the Group Housing. The representative of the project proponent informed to the authority
that they have providing green area more than the area which was approved in the building plans
and also intimated that no specific condition regarding provision for Green to the tune of 30% was
mentioned in the EC letter.
After detailed deliberations, the authority decided to defer this case with the decision that
Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for
inspection as indicated above and shall submit the report within 15 days.
Item No.[8] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Sarvodaya Hospital &
Research Centre (A Unit of Anshu Hospital Ltd.) At Site No. 1, Sector-08 at
Faridabad by M/s Anshu Hospitals Limited.
The case was considered in the 103rd meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority
decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days
period.
The sub-committee inspected the site on 03.06.2017 in presence of the representatives of
the project proponent. The status of project site compliances of EC conditions was discussed
with them. The following observations are made:
1. The construction of the project was carried out as per plan. Block-A & B has been
constructed, while no construction has been done in block C & D. No extra construction
has been carried out (Annexure-I)
2. Two tube wells are under operation for which month monthly charges are paid to MCF
(annexure-II).
3. Three water connections from HUDA exist for which monthly charges are being paid.
The water consumption is within the prescribed limit (Annexure-III)
4. Hospital has proper waste water disposal connection and receipt of MCF was shown
(Annexure-IV).
5. Three rain water harvesting pits have been constructed and are connected to storm water
drain.
6. The STP was found under running condition and no re-use of treated waste water was
found.
7. Fire NOC from competent authority has been taken and attached (Annexure-V).
8. Disposal of solid waste is being done by M/s Trigun Services (annexure-VI).
9. The disposal of bio-medical waste is being done by M/s Golden Eagle Waste
Management Pvt. Ltd, an authorized vendor (annexure-VII).
5
The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting, the authority studied
the site visit report submitted on 13.06.2017 the authority observed that the sub-committee has
not reported any violation except no re-use of treated water. Authority unanimously decided that
case to be referred back to SEAC for appraisal with the condition that project proponent must re-
use the treated water through duel plumbing. The SEAC may recommend the case on merit as
per procedure prescribed in the Notification and time to time guidelines issued by MOEF & CC,
GOI.
Item No.[9] Extension of environment clearance for Group Housing Colony project at
Village Gwal Pahari, Sector-2, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Jasmine
Buildmart Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 30.11.2015 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 29.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 49852.01sqm (12.3185 acres)
2. Built up area 101242.81 sqm
3. License Valid up 14.05.2018
4. Nos. of Towers 5 Towers, 1 basement + G + 24 Floors, Retail
area, Residential Dwelling Units and EWS
Units.
5. Dwelling units 176 DU, 32 EWS
6. Height 88.35 Meter
7. Green belt 31.10%
8. Water requirement 230 KLD
9. Fresh Water 103 KLD
10. Waste Water 141 KLD
11 STP Capacity 170 KLD
12. Power Requirement 2600 KW DHBVN
13. Solid Waste 676.834 kg/day
14. Parking 434 ECS
15. RWH 10 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
[1] Form 1A
• The various points under 8.1, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, & 9.7 under Form-1A not explained properly.
Explain & elaborate the same.
• Address mentioned on Form 1 shows above mentioned project is located in sector-2 but
AAQ reports submitted on page 100-102 are of sector-3; is it same?
• The samples of air collected to calculate the “Ground Level Concentration” should have
been representative in nature but the samples collected on 19.02.2016 show PM2.5 &
PM10 44.26/40.85/43.84 & 91.89/82.07/84.20 µg/m3respectively definitely below the
limits of NAAQS but contradicts the data shown at HSPCB, Gurugram site
6
http://hspcb.gov.in/AAQD.html. The status of ambient air quality in NCR is as such all
over the media then why should it be accepted the said AAQ at sector-2/3 of Gurugram?
Explain the contradiction
• Pt.5.1; submitted to install 6 DG Sets capacity totaling to 4000KVA; to calculate
additional ground level concentration the individual capacity of DG sets is required then
how it has been calculated without knowing the individual capacity of DG sets?
[2] Calculations of daily water Demand
Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF & CC for Water use reduction as given in
Table:2.4
• Water demand for cooling of DG sets remained constant i.e. 27 KLD in all three seasons.
. The process of cooling involves evaporation of water and the rate of evaporation
depends upon the ambient temperature, therefore, the quantity of water required for
HVAC cooling in winter would be quite less..
• Secondly, due to evaporation concentration of dissolved salts will increase in circulating
water, what mechanism is proposed to treat this water & how to handle the
residual/rejects? Submit schematic plan.
Location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan
Incorporate the above mentioned suggestions and resubmit the “Water Balance Diagram” of all
three seasons separately.
[3] Installation of DG set:
4000 KVA DG sets are proposed to be installed; transportation, storage & handling of
such large volume of HSD; status of statutory compliances & safety measures to be
taken.
[4] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit
report to the SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution.
(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.
(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.
(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of ground
water.
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing
project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste.
(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation.
(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project.
(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel.
And may point out any anomaly which can deteriorate environment and comes under the
ambit of “Environment Clearance”.
7
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation from Sr. No. 1 to 3 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh.
R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the
points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[10] Environment Clearance for mining of (Boulder, Gravel & Sand) at Begampur
Block/YNR B-37, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar (Haryana)
by M/s Yamuna Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd,
The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for mining of
(Boulder, Gravel & Sand) at Begampur Block/YNR B-37, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna
Nagar (Haryana) by imposing stipulations stated therein.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 17.08.2016 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 29.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-1 project.
3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by (Boulder, Gravel&
Sand) at Begampur Block/YNR B-37, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar
(Haryana) for a period of 08 years vide letter dated 19.06.2015.
4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from Forest
Department.
5. The proposed production is 7, 11, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water requirement is 52
KLD.
6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 1000 plants saplings for every year for 5
years along the roads, in barren area.
The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It
was observed by the Authority that:
[1] The project proponent should submit the arrangement to be made to ensure that no
seepage of diesel/spent oil would take place.
[2] The project proponent should submit the plan for transportation and storage of diesel and
related safety measures.
[3] The pp should submit a plan to ensure that no fugitive emission would take place due to
plying of vehicles/movement of machineries.
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to
the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC
letter shall be issued by the office.
Item No.[11] Environment Clearance for Group Housing colony located at village
NangliUmarpur, Sector -62, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Emaar MGF Land
Limited.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 30.11.2015 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
8
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 29.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 56757.15sqm
2. Built up area 187514.31 sqm
3. License Valid up 01.12.2015 and applied of renewal of
license (EDC/IDC payment slips attached)
4. Nos. of Towers 6 Towers, 2 basement + GF + 29 Floors,
convenient shopping, community center, club,
service personals
5. Height 100 Meter
6. Green belt 30%
7. Water requirement 483 KLD
8. Fresh Water 242 KLD
9. Waste Water 317 KLD
10. STP Capacity 381 KLD
11 Power Requirement 5296 KW (Phase-I – 3369 KW & Phase-II-
1927 KW)
12. Solid Waste 1373.2 kg/day (phase I- 941.33, phase-II -
431.862)
13. Parking 1273 ECS (phase I- 748, phase-II -525)
14. RWH 20 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
DG Sets
The following anomaly has been observed in the given data for DG sets
Form 1A & EIA studies undertaken show the capacity & number of DG sets as Phase-1(2x500 +
2x320) =1640 KVA & Phase-2(3x380)=1140 KVA, total capacity 2780 KVA. But in reply to
Query-2 raised by SEAC during its 146th Meeting dated 14/12/16; in annexure-II capacity of DG
sets shown are Phase-1(2x1500 + 1x500)=3500 KVA & Phase-2(2x1010 + 1x380)=2400 KVA,
total capacity 5900 KVA.
Even the Water Demand for Cooling of DG sets has been raised from (9+6)=15 KLD to
(19+12.96)=31.96KLD.
What is the actual proposed capacity of various DG sets proposed to be installed?
Compute the “water Demand” for cooling on the basis of actual proposed capacity of
various DG sets & submit the computation/calculations.
On what basis (Capacity of DG sets) the “Air Dispersion Modelling” has been done as
the stack emission depends upon the burning of fuel or upon capacity?
Calculations of daily water Demand
Would Water demand for cooling of DG sets remained constant in all three seasons? The
process of cooling involves evaporation of water and the rate of evaporation depends
9
upon the ambient temperature, therefore, the quantity of water required for HVAC
cooling in Winter would be quite less .
Location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan
Secondly, due to evaporation concentration of dissolved salts will increase in circulating
water, what mechanism is proposed to treat this water & how to handle the
residual/rejects? Submit schematic plan.
Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF & CC for Water Use reduction as given in
Table:2.4
Form-1A
The explanation under the headings 5.4, 9.3, 9.5, 9.6 & 9.9 of Form-1A are not proper&
well elaborated. Explain & elaborate.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15
days period.
Item No.[12] Environment Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Complex at Sector-
88A 89A, Village-Harsaru, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Oasis
Buildhome Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 27.04.2016 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 29.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 59423.98 sqm (Existing 55680.69 sqm,
additional 3743.29 sqm )
2. Built up area 157098.09 sqm (under construction –
121361.25 sqm, additional 35736.844 sqm)
3. License Valid up 09.10.2017
4. Nos. of Towers 10 Towers + EWS, 2 basement + GF + 31
Floors, Dwelling Units, EWS, Servant Unit,
Nursery School, Community Building & Club,
Convenient shopping.
5. Height 94.52 Meter
6. Green belt 35.27%
7. Water requirement 739.8 KLD
8. Fresh Water 420 KLD
9. Waste Water 548.2 KLD
10. STP Capacity 4 STPs (310 + 250 + 8 + 75 KLD)
11 Power Requirement 6400.52 KW
12. Solid Waste 2133 kg/day 2 nos. of OWC 1493 kg/day
13. ECS 1363 ECS
14. RWH 16 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of forest land,
10
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
1. ToR
Appln. For TOR submitted on 18/04/16
Base-line data collection from March to May,2016
ToR approved on 12/07/16
The Authority during its meeting found out that the application for “Terms of
Reference” submitted on 18.04.2016 and as per available records; the collection of
baseline data has started from March 2016; more than a month and half earlier. Secondly,
the mean value of PM2.5 depicted on pg.no. 184/185 is 52.7 & 57.1 µg/mt3, well within
the permissible limit of NAAQS. The data collected from 01/03/16 to 25/05/16; this
being Harvesting season& temperature rises with possibility of high velocity winds with
dust. Secondly, as such there is a big concern about the deteriorating ambient quality of
NCR region due to increase in particulate matter in the ambient air. Data (2015-17) of
VikasSadan, Gurgaon, taken from HSPCB website shows average value of PM 2.5 as
97.25/102.59/96.08 µg/m3 in March-May,2016 respectively.
http://hspcb.gov.in/AAQD.html
This all leads the authority to the conclusion that as season for baseline
environment study (March to May) was expiring so the data collection date has been
shown 48 days earlier to make up the deficiency. Even the reports submitted contradict
the present level of “Particulate matters” with the available data on the HSPCB website
“http://hspcb.gov.in/AAQD.html”.
On the basis of above written facts authority construes that the samples might
have not been drawn and the findings are not of representative in nature. Hence,
Authority directs project proponent to recollect the data during coming post monsoon
season and resubmit.
2. Water balance Chart
Construction phase
Tyre washing 162 lts/truck, put “Water Trough” to conserve water & for washing of
Tyres
Operation phase
Canopy area 25 Sq.mt. meaning thereby the radius would be 2.82 mts , therefore the
distance between two trees to be at least 5.64 mts. Submit the tree plantation plan
Proposal is to grow native species, do these require so much of the water on daily basis?
Water is scarce& precious source conserve it by meticulous planning
Wet scrubber, where it is being installed, design & capacity of the same
Miscellaneous needs of water consumption be explained properly
Location & carrying capacity of “External Sewer”
[3] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra
Members SEACshall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit
report to the SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:
11
(i) Water balance diagram of existing project and proposed project for expansion.
(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.
(iii) Status of construction in expansion part if any.
(iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using treated water.
(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.
(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste.
And may point out any anomaly which can deteriorate environment and comes under the
ambit of “Environment Clearance”.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation from Sr. No. 1 to 2 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and
Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on
the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
Item No.[13] Environment Clearance for construction of Cyber Park Colony in the revenue
estate of Village Behrampur, Sector-58, Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex,
Haryana by M/s Basic Developers Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 10.08.2016 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 39127.981 sqm (9.6687 Acre)
2. Built up area 178646.057 sqn
3. License Valid up 05.09.2018
4. Nos. of Towers 06 Blocks , 3 basements + G/S + maximum 26
Floors
5. Height 124 Meter
6. Green belt 30.17%
7. Water requirement 617 KLD
8. Fresh Water 299 KLD
9. Waste Water 353 KLD
10. STP Capacity 424 KLD
11 Power Requirement 16814 KVA
12. Solid Waste 2314 kg/day
13. ECS 2634 ECS
14. RWH 9 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
1. Water Balance Diagram
Six blocks have been proposed in Form 1A with HVAC system installed in each. The
quantity of water required as follows
12
Block-1 Block-2 Block-3 Block-4 Block-5 Block-6 Total
HVAC(KLD) 8 130 50 80 10 7 285
Filter Back-
Wash(KLD)
1 6 5 5 1 1 19
Total water required for HVAC cooling was 285KLD & for filter back-wash 19KLD
Query no. 6 raised during 151st Meeting of SEAC held on 02/05/17; PP was supposed
to submit detail Computation of HVAC requirement & reduce fresh water requirement.
But no computation was provided, fresh water demand was reduced from 392KLD to
299 KLD out of which 173 KLD was proposed for HVAC cooling, initially it was 241
KLD
Query no. 2 raised during 152nd Meeting of SEAC held on 30/05/17; PP was supposed
to resubmit detail Computation of HVAC requirement & reduce fresh water
requirement; again no computations were submitted but fresh water demand was
reduced from 299 to 245 KLD by reducing the requirement of fresh water for HVAC
cooling from 173 to 119KLD.
Is there any basis of calculating water demand for HVAC cooling or it is being
submitted arbitrarily? Show the calculation and computation on which basis this
quantity of water is derived. And the fresh water for the cooling purposes cannot be
allowed as the availability of treated water is in penalty but “Fresh/potable water” is
very scarce; hence, water being day scarce resource that must be conserve.
Filter back-wash cannot be a regular phenomenon, where the water after washing will
lead to definitely not going to vanish or consumed in process.
Reply to query 2 raised during the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 30/05/17
shows126KLD water needed for HVAC Cooling. The process of cooling involves
evaporation of water and the rate of evaporation depends upon the ambient temperature,
therefore, the quantity of water required for HVAC cooling in Winter would be quite
less than in summer. Secondly, due to evaporation concentration of dissolved salts will
increase in circulating water, what mechanism is proposed to treat this water & how to
handle the residual/rejects? Submit schematic plan.
Water is a scarce resource, therefore, why to use 119,000lts of fresh/potable water for
cooling purposes that too on daily basis. Use treated water only
Location of Cooling Tower on Lay-out plan.
Incorporate the above said and resubmit “Water Balance Diagrams” for all three seasons
separately.
2. Installation of DG:
8 DG sets of 1500 KVA are proposed to be installed; transportation, storage & handling
of such large volume of HSD; status of statutory compliances & safety measured to be
taken
13
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[14] Environment Clearance for Revision &Expansion of Group Housing Colony
“RahejaRevanta”, Village-Shikohpur, Sector-78, Dist. Gurgaon-Manesar
Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Raheja Developers Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 14.09.2016 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 75762.293 sqm (18.7213 Acre)
2. Built up area 297575.867 sqn (Existing 146173.074 +
Expansion 151402.793 sqm)
3. License Valid up 31.05.2017
4. Nos. of Towers 03 Towers, Low rise blocks, 2 Basements +GF
+ maximum 50 floors, Nursery school, EWS
Building, Commercial Building, Community
Block
5. Height 204 Meter
6. Green belt 30.02%
7. Water requirement 1171 KLD
8. Fresh Water 659.715 KLD
9. Waste Water 869.29 KLD
10. STP Capacity 1000 KLD
11 Power Requirement 10812 KVA
12. Solid Waste 3808 kg/day
13. ECS 1775 ECS
14. RWH 18 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
[1] Query no.5; raised by SEAC in its 150th meeting held on 06/04/17, “PP should submit
revised fresh water requirement & Water Balance Diagram. PP submitted the reply in the
form of “Water balance Diagrams” as Annexure-IV
Main document Revised plan
Total water requirement 1080KLD 1171KLD *Total Fresh Water needed 666.1KLD 639.715KLD
Waste Water 811.78KLD 869.292KLD
*Reduction in the consumption of “Fresh water Requirement” is achieved on paper by
reducing “Total Occupancy” from 6963 to 6523; visitors from 696 to 652 instead it
should have been achieved by incorporating the MoEF recommendations for “Water Use
Reduction” as given in Table 2.4. How did the projection of occupancy & visitors level
dip, any calculations to show?
14
Horticulture initially needing 6lts/mt2, revised to 7.5 lts/mt2, why so? What about winter
& monsoon seasons.
In revision need of “Treated Water” for Car Washing etc. has been removed
Water required for flushing is raised from 30-33.33% of domestic consumption, how?
The given data in revision does not lead to reduction in consumption of water which
should have been as per the recommendations of MoEF & CC given in Table 2.4
20 KLD of Fresh water for swimming pool, water in pool or water bodies is lost due to
evaporation so it is needed for replenishment not for replacement as is shown in revised
plan. What is the total cross-sectional area of pool/water bodies on its basis calculate the
water requirement?
[2] Form 1A
Explain pt. 8.3 , 9.1,9.3,9.5 & 9.7 properly.
[3] The project proponent should submit the copy of valid license.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[15] Environment Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
located at Villlage-Ullahawas, Sector-62, Gurgaon-Manesar Urban
Complex, Haryana by M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 25.01.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 20512.471 sqm (5.06875 Acre)
2. Built up area 55506.758 sqn
3. License Valid up 29.05.2021
4. Nos. of Towers The project comprise of Housing, Commercial
Area, Aanganwadi and Community area
5. Height 51.853 Meter
6. Green belt 20.30%
7. Water requirement 372 KLD
8. Fresh Water 253 KLD
9. Waste Water 305 KLD
10. STP Capacity 350 KLD
11 Power Requirement 3080.80 KW DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 2072 kg/day
13. ECS 370 ECS or 740 no. of two wheelers
14. RWH 7 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
15
Water balance Chart
The query no. 5 raised during the 150th meeting of SEAC to submit detailed “Water
Conservation Plan”; PP replied “Same is enclosed in Annexure-V”
Even in reply of Query no.6 “Submit revised Fresh water Requirement & Water balance
Diagram”; PP indicated Annexure-V
Annexure-V has two Water Balance diagrams one “Without conservation”(Not initially
submitted) & other “With Conservation”. With conservation is replica of what initially
on pg.no. 41 of main document is submitted (65 LPCD). Secondly, Fresh water
requirement remained constant at 253 KLD for all the seasons and is same as submitted
in Main document. Then, What & Where is the “Revised Fresh water requirement” and
what about the “Water Conservation plan”, how it is different from the plan submitted
initially
DG Cooling requires 5 KLD of water, very much on the higher side. Secondly, there will
be an increase in concentration of salt in the circulating water due to evaporation. Give
Schematic plan to treat this water & to handle the residue/rejects . The capacity of DG
sets indicated (200 KVA,125 & 100 KVA) does not require cooling tower; can be Air
Cooled
Sludge & evaporation losses are very much on higher side (30 KLD). Secondly,
evaporation losses are temperature (ambient) dependent so cannot be constant throughout
the year
Form 1A
The details of back ground air quality levels with predicted values based on dispersion
models taking into account the increased traffic generation not provided
Explain pt. 8.1,8.3 & 9.1 properly
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[16] Environment Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project at Village
Pathreri, Tehsil-Manesar, District-Gurgao, Haryana by M/s JKS
Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 10.03.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 114547.213 sqm
2. Built up area 72785.32 sqn
3. CLU Valid up 25.08.2018
4. Ware house Ware house non agro logistics
5. Height 20.259 Meter
16
6. Green belt 20.48%
7. Water requirement 50 KLD
8. Fresh Water 5 KLD
9. Waste Water 14 KLD
10. STP Capacity 20 KLD
11 Power Requirement 1500 KVA HVPNL
12. Solid Waste 83 kg/day
13. ECS 17986.25 sqm
14. RWH 26 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
Form 1A
The details of back ground air quality levels with predicted values based on dispersion
models taking into account the increased traffic generation as a result of the proposed
project for ware house. Due to the movement of heavy vehicles the particles will grind&
regrind giving rise to increase in PM; how much it is predicted on the basis of study
undertaken? What is the back ground value & what would be additional Ground level
concentration leading to Total GLC?
Explain pt. 8.3 , 9.1,9.3,9.5 & 9.7 properly
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to
the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC
letter shall be issued.
Item No.[17] Environment Clearance for construction of commercial Colony (3.5035 Acre)
namely “Boulvard Project” located at Village Daulatabad, Sector-106,
Gurgaon, Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Magic Eye Developers Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 27.04.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 14178.139 sqm (3.5035 Acre)
2. Built up area 39003.932 sqn
3. License Valid up 10.04.2021
4. Nos. of Towers 2 Basements +GF + 19 floors. The project
comprise of Service Apartments (1BHK
Apartments-224 Bis, abd 2 BHK apartments -
120 Nos.)
5. Height 60.85 Meter
6. Green belt 30.34%
17
7. Water requirement 157 KLD
8. Fresh Water 101 KLD
9. Waste Water 124 KLD
10. STP Capacity 150 KLD
11 Power Requirement 1668 KVA DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 543 kg/day
13. ECS 509 ECS
14. RWH 3 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
Water balance Diagram
Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as in Table
2.4
The water required for Horticulture is very much on higher side, it has to be season
dependent. Resubmit the water balance chart incorporating the recommendations on
“water use Reduction” for different seasons separately
Location & carrying capacity of “External sewer” where 32 KLD treated water is
supposed to be discharged
Form 1A
Provide the details & data as asked under pt. 5.1. Test report dtd. 12/04/17 on page no.
174 shows value of PM2.5& PM10 as 47.55 &98.83 µg/m3 respectively, well below the
norms of NAAQS. Submit some documents to substantiate & corroborate the findings
Provide the details as asked under pt. 8.1
Submission under pt. 8.3 is to use “Fly-ash” for road construction. What types of the
equipment are proposed to handle, store the same & to prevent the fugitive emission?
Provide the details as asked under pt. 9.1,9.3,9.5,9.6 & 9.7
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period.
Item No.[18] Environment Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
Colony located at Village Wazirpur, Sector-92, Distruct-Gurugram, Haryana
by M/s GLS Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 05.05.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 25545.74 sqm (6.31 Acre)
18
2. Built up area 59557.61 sqn
3. License Valid up 07.02.2022
4. Nos. of Towers 1 Basement +GF + 12 floors. The project
comprise of Residential Towers (912 DU).,
commercial area, Aanganwadi and Club House
5. Height 39.45 Meter
6. Green belt 19.96%
7. Water requirement 463 KLD
8. Fresh Water 304 KLD
9. Waste Water 378 KLD
10. STP Capacity 2 STPs 535 KLD +150 KLD
11 Power Requirement 4357.46 KVA DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 2440 kg/day
13. ECS 474 ECS
14. RWH 6 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
Water balance diagram
Water is a scarce resource, must be conserved; Incorporate the recommendations of
MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as in Table 2.4
DG Cooling requires 22KLD of water, very much on the higher side. Secondly, there will
be an increase in concentration of salt in the circulating water due to evaporation. Give
Schematic plan to treat this water & to handle the residue/rejects .
Sludge & evaporation losses are very much on higher side (71KLD). Secondly,
evaporation losses are temperature (ambient) dependent so cannot be constant throughout
the year
Location of cooling tower on the lay-out may be shown
Form 1A
Provide the details as asked under pt. 9.5
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to
the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC
letter shall be issued.
Item No.[19] Environment Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
Project at Sector-78, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Conscient Infrastructure
Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 09.05.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
19
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 29922.409 sqm
2. Built up area 83850.09 sqn
3. License Valid up 25.09.2021
4. Nos. of Towers 19 Blocks (10 residential + 8 commercial + 1
Community) 1 Basement +GF + 14 floors.
DU –1021
5. Height 44.96 Meter
6. Green belt 25.04%
7. Water requirement 835 KLD
8. Fresh Water 516 KLD
9. Waste Water 688 KLD
10. STP Capacity 826 KLD
11 Power Requirement 5167 KW DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 2.95 TPD
13. ECS 570 ECS
14. RWH 10 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
Water Balance Diagram
Provide the water balance diagram for different seasons i.e. Summer, monsoon & winter
separately; incorporate the recommendations of MoEF&CC for “Water Use Reduction”
Location & Carrying capacity of the external sewer
Energy conservation
Provide Assumed Power Consumption per sq. ft. of built-up area
Explain pt. 9.5 & 9.8 properly of Form-1A
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to
the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC
letter shall be issued.
Item No.[20] Environment Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
Colony “Global Hill View” located at Village Sohna, Sector-11, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s V.K.Motors Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 09.05.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 21903.61sqm (5.4125)
20
2. Built up area 57763.98 sqm
3. License Valid up 10.06.2019
4. Nos. of Towers 5 towers, S + 19 Floors. The project comprise
of Housing, Commercial Area, Aanganwadi
and Community area
5. Height 60.2 Meter
6. Green belt 21.48%
7. Water requirement 363 KLD
8. Fresh Water 252 KLD
9. Waste Water 288 KLD
10. STP Capacity 500 KLD
11 Power Requirement 3390.71 KW DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 2071 kg/day
13. ECS 380 ECS or 760 nos. of two wheeler
14. RWH 6 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
Water balance diagram
Water is a scarce resource, must be conserved; 125 & 320KVA DG sets can be air cooled
no need of having Cooling Tower & evaporating 3000lts of water per day
Sludge & evaporation losses are very much on higher side (43KLD). Secondly,
evaporation losses are temperature (ambient) dependent so cannot be constant throughout
the year
Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as in Table
2.4
Form 1A
Provide the details as asked under pt. 8.1 & 9.5
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC
and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to
the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall
supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC
letter shall be issued.
Item No.[21] Environment Clearance for construction of Warehouse other than
agriculture produce located at Village-Pathreri, District-Gurgaon, Haryana
by M/s GLS Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 09.05.2017 for seeking environment
clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 30.05.2017 recommended this project for
environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks
1. Plot area 102859.13sqm (24.41Acre)
21
2. Built up area 77200.73 sqm
3. CLU Valid up 03.08.2018
4. Nos. of Towers 5 Blocks, GF + 03 Floors.
5. Height 18.25 Meter
6. Green belt 21.98%
7. Water requirement 45 KLD
8. Fresh Water 2 KLD
9. Waste Water 8 KLD
10. STP Capacity 10 KLD
11 Power Requirement 4000 KVA DHBVN
12. Solid Waste 75 kg/day
13. ECS 619 ECS
14. RWH 29 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s
meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green
belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,
recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority
that:
Form 1A
The details of back ground air quality levels with predicted values based on dispersion
models taking into account the increased traffic generation not provided
Secondly, the proposed project is of “Ware House”, will result into increased movement
of heavy vehicles and the dust particles will grind & regrind to give rise to increase in air
pollution. What steps are being proposed & implemented to mitigate it?
Submission under pt. 8.3 is to use “Fly-ash” for road construction. What types of the
equipment are proposed to handle, store the same & to prevent the fugitive emission?
Provide the details as asked under pt. 9.1,9.2,9.5 & 9.11
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the
decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised
observation within 15 days period.
ADDITIONAL AGENDA:-
Item No.[22] Request to transfer Environment Clearance granted in favour of M/s
Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd for development of Commercial Colony on an
area of 3.15 acres at Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon in the name of
M/s Ameya Commercial Projetcs Pvt. Ltd.
The SEIAA vide letter dated 09.03.2017 granted Environment Clearance for the
construction of Commercial colony on an area of 3.15 acres with (Total plot area 12,747.58 sq.
Mtrs and proposed built-up area 38,848.677 sq. Mtrs) in the revenue estate of village Hayatpur,
Sector -93, Gurgaon,Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd, 374, UdyogVihar, Phase-4,
Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana. The project proponent has requested to transfer the environment
clearance in the name of M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd as the license pertaining to
the project has been transferred in the name of M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd by
Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana.
22
It is pertinent to mention here that SEIAA vide letter dated 10.03.2017 granted
environment Clearance for the construction of Commercial Complex Colony on an area of 2.5
( Total Plot area 10117.125 Sqm and Total Built-up area 32639.054 Sqm) acres in the revenue
estate of village Mewaka, Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana to M/s Ameya Commercial Projects
Pvt. Ltd. The Total Plot area of the both project is 12747.58+10117.125=22864.705 Sqm. and
the total built-up area is 38,848.677+32639.054=71487.731 Sqm.
As per para 11 of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 there is provision for the transfer of
the Environment Clearance letter. The relevant para of EIA Notification is reproduced is as
under:-
11. Transferability of Environmental Clearance (EC):
A prior environmental clearance granted for a specific project or activity to an applicant
may be transferred during its validity to another legal person entitled to undertake the project
or activity on application by the transferor, or by the transferee with a written “no objection”
by the transferor, to, and by the regulatory authority concerned, on the same terms and
conditions under which the prior environmental clearance was initially granted, and for the
same validity period. No reference to the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert
Appraisal Committee concerned is necessary in such cases.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the authority decided to Sh.
Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for
inspection and shall submit the ascertain facts of the project within 15 days period.
******
1
CORRECTED MOM DUE TO SOME TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR
Minutes of the 105thmeeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority
held on. 24thJuly, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),
Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2
Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated
14.9.2006.
The entire Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC
for Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated
vide letter No. 465 to 467 dated 18.07.2017 were discussed following decisions were
taken:-
Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio Medical WasteTreatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, VillageBazidaJatan, near railway crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal, Haryanaby M/s. Haat Supreme Wastech Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the last meeting and the Authority needs some
more time to study and discuss the submissions made by project proponent.
Therefore, the case was deferred.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the Authority had
elaborate discussions on the subject and needs more time to decide whether there
should be public hearing or not. Therefore, the case has been deferred.
Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical WasteTreatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1kite. No 50, Tadadi No 314, village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala,District Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Esskay Hygienic Services.
The case was considered in the last meeting and the Authority needs some
more time to study and discuss the submissions made by project proponent.
Therefore, the case was deferred.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the Authority had
elaborate discussions on the subject and needs more time to decide whether there
should be public hearing or not. Therefore, the case has been deferred.
Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical WasteTreatment Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz KaMeo Industrialarea, Sohna, Mewat, Haryana by Synergy Waste Management Pvt.Ltd.
The case was considered in the last meeting and the Authority needs some
more time to study and discuss the submissions made by project proponent.
Therefore, the case was deferred.
2
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the Authority had
elaborate discussions on the subject and needs more time to decide whether there
should be public hearing or not. Therefore, the case has been deferred.
Item No.[4] Environment Clearance for construction of Cyber Park Colony in therevenue estate of Village Behrampur, Sector-58, Gurgaon-ManesarUrban Complex, Haryana by M/s Basic Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The case was initially taken up in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on
21.06.2017 as certain queries were raised regarding computation of requirement of
water for cooling tower of HVAC & DG sets and for the storage of HSD for
proposed DG sets so, the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 21.07.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up
for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply.
It was observed by the Authority that the proposed HVAC and the DG sets will be
air cooled therefore no requirement of water for cooling towers; subsequently
project proponent has submitted the separate water balance chart for different
seasons and reduced the total water requirement to 437 KLD. The project
proponent further stated that the statutory compliances for the storage of HSD will
be duly obtained. Even project proponent submitted an undertaking in this regard.
On the basis of satisfactory reply to the queries and the case being appraised
& recommended by SEAC; the Authority decided to accord Environment Clearance
to this project.
Item No.[5] Environment Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Group HousingColony “Raheja Revanta”, Village-Shikohpur, Sector-78, Dist.Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s RahejaDevelopers Ltd.
The case was initially taken up in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on
21.06.2017 and queries regarding the requirement of water and proper reply to the
certain points in Form-IA were raised. The project proponent has submitted reply
and incorporated the MoEF & CC Guidelines for reduction of water consumption,
thereby, reducing the fresh water demand to 413 KLD and has reduced the make-up
water for the swimming pool to 4 KLD and submitted separate water balance
diagram for the all three seasons. Further, project proponent has submitted an
affidavit not to discharge untreated effluent/water in the external sewer and made
the submission that till time sewer is not provided by the concerned authority
project proponent will make its own arrangement for the disposal/discharge of
excess treated water.
3
On the basis of the appraisal & recommendation made by SEAC and the
satisfactory reply to the queries, the Authority decided to accord Environment
Clearance to this project.
Item No.[6] Environment Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing
located at Villlage-Ullahawas, Sector-62, Gurgaon-Manesar Urban
Complex, Haryana by M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The case was initially taken up in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on
21.06.2017 and queries regarding the requirement of water and proper reply to the
certain points in Form-IA were raised. The project proponent has submitted the
water balance diagram with the conservation plan and agreed to have air cooled DG
sets. Further, project proponent has reduced the sludge and evaporation losses to
1.53 / 1.37 / 0.97 KLD depending upon the season. The recalculated estimated fresh
water demand is 253 KLD. The project proponent has submitted the undertakings
regarding installation of air cooled DG sets and for the discharge of excess treated
water in external sewer provided by the concerned authorities and to make
adequate arrangement for the same till the external sewer is provided. Subsequently
project proponent has elaborated all the raised the points pertaining to Form IA.
On the basis of the case being apprised & recommended by SEAC and
satisfactory reply to the queries the Authority decided to accord Environment
Clearance to this project.
Item No.[7] Environment Clearance for construction of commercial Colony (3.5035Acre) namely “Boulvard Project” located at Village Daulatabad,Sector-106, Gurgaon, Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Magic EyeDevelopers Pvt. Ltd.
The case was initially taken up in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on
21.06.2017 and the project proponent was asked to incorporate the
recommendations of MoEF& CC for water use reduction as in table 2.4 and project
proponent was asked to submit the details of background air quality levels with
predicted values based on dispersion models and to elaborate certain points in Form
IA. The project proponent has submitted the reply after incorporating the
recommendations of MoEF & CC on water use reduction leading to fresh water
requirement to 61 KLD; even the water required for horticulture is reduced to
5.5/1.8/0.5lts/sqmt of green area depending upon the season. The project proponent
has submitted the undertaking regarding discharge of excess treated water to
external sewer provided by the concerned authorities and to make adequate
arrangement at its owntill the sewer is provided by the concerned authorities. The
project proponent was asked to verify the results submitted for the particulate
matters; project proponent has submitted the report of the fresh sample taken on
15th July 2017; the values of PM 2.5 shown to be 47.55 and 69.2 µg/m3and 98.8 & 126
4
µg/m3 for PM 10 respectively, the results seems to be on the higher side of NAAQS.
The project proponent is suggested to take adequate measure to suppress the
particulate matter arising due to increase volume of traffic circulation in the
proposed project.
On the basis of the reply to the queries, appraisal & recommendation of
SEAC the Authority decided to accord Environment Clearance to this project.
Item No.[8] Environment Clearance for construction of Warehouse other than
agriculture produce located at Village-Pathreri, District-Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s GLS Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on
21.06.2017 and the case was deferred.
The project proponent on 21.07.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up for
consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and found the following:
[1] What type of the storage arrangement for Fly ash is being proposed as it
cannot be stored under sheets/tarpaulins ?
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and the project proponent directed to submit the
satisfactory clarification within 15 days and circulate the copies of same to all
members of SEIAA. On the basis of submission of the satisfactory reply the EC
letter shall be issued.
Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for construction of “5 Star Hotel” at Village
Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s
Munjal Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.
The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on
05.12.2016. The Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Dr S. N.
Mishra and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC would visit the site for inspection
and submit the report. The committee had submitted the site visit report on
15.06.2017. The site visit report submitted by the committee is as under:
Site Visit Report
The members inspected the site & discussed the proposal with the
representatives of project proponent who showed relevant documents, drawings,&
approvals of the scheme. The observations are as follows:
5
1. License for setting up a commercial colony was granted to Sh. Maman Singh,
D-1/2, Model Town-3, New Delhi vide DGTCP office License No. 25 of 1999
(Annexure-A).
2. The said License was transferred in the name of M/s Krishna Buildwell &
Developers by DGTCP on 12.07.2002 (Annexure-B).
3. Environment Clearance was granted by MoEF on 19.07.2007 to M/s Krishna
Buildwell& Developers for setting up a 5 star hotel (Annexure-C).
4. Munjal Hospitality private Limited (MHPL) purchased the land (3.974 acres)
on which the hotel project is situated along with all assets including building,
furniture etc. in March 2012 (Annexure-D).
5. The built up super structure on the entire plot of land was under demolition.
Photograph attached (Annexure-E).
6. JCB machines were seen on the roof of the building breaking the structure..
7. MHPL has applied to competent authority in June 2016 for increased FAR
under TOD policy (Annexure-F).
Conclusion
From the above it is evident that the EC for the project was obtained from
MOEF in 2007, now stands expired. To make use of the TOD policy of the Govt. to
get the benefits of additional FAR, project proponents are razing the entire existing
structure.
In the today’s meeting it was noticed that as per the site visit report
“Demolition” is being taken place of structure for which the environment clearance
was granted by MoEF on 19.07.2007 in the name of M/s Krishna Buildwell and
Developers for setting up a 5 Star Hotel. As the “Environmental clearance” is
expired meaning, thereby, no further construction or demolition can take place
without having the valid “Environmental Clearance” provided built-up area is less
than 20,000sq. mt.
Authority drew its decision from the EIA notification, 2006 which states that
“Projects undertaking expansion, modernization and change in product mix without
prior Environmental Clearance be treated as cases of violation”. Thus, Authority
decided whether its construction or demolitions both have the environmental
concerns and valid “Environment Clearance” should be taken before the
commencement of work. This pertains to a clear violation of EIA notification, 2006.
After detailed deliberation the authority decided to issue a notice to the
project proponent in this regard.
Item No.[10]Extension of Environmental Clearance of proposed Group HousingProject, Express Greens II, Sector MIA, Sector MIA (19.643 acres),Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DLF Homes Developers Limited.
6
The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA and the Authority
decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.
Mishra, Members SEAC would visit the site for inspection and submit the report on
the above within 15 days period.
The sub-committee inspected the site on 06.05.2017 in the presence of the
representatives of the project proponent showed relevant documents, drawings &
approvals of the scheme.
Conclusion of the Committee:-
It is clear that the project proponent had valid EC up to 27.10.2016. However
Hon’ble Supreme Court has stayed the construction at site since 24.04.2015. There
was no sign of any construction activity at site.
Almost 80% of the project stands completed. Balance work would require at
least 2 years for final completion.
Keeping In view the above, the Authority decided to grant extension for
validity of EC for 2 years subject to compliance of the conditions already imposed in
the environmental clearance letter.
Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for the construction of proposed GroupHousing project at Sector-70A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s PalInfrastructure & Developers Pvt. Ltd.
1. Whereas application for Environmental Clearance was received by the
SEIAA, Haryana on 13.04.2011 and the same was transferred to the SEAC,
Haryana for the appraisal.
2. Show cause notice was issued to the PP vide letter No. 829 dated 27.11.2012.
PP submitted the reply on 01.03.2013.
3. Whereas case was taken up in the 80th, 81st and 87th meetings of SEAC held
on 30.04.2013, 10.05.2013, and 23.07.2013 respectively and case was sent to
SEIAA for initiating legal action against the project proponent.
4. Whereas after taking the legal action against the PP, the case was taken up in
the 111th meeting held on 08.09.2014. Observations of 111th meeting were
conveyed to the PP vide letter No. 1629 dated 11.09.2014. PP submitted the reply
on 24.09.2014.
5. Whereas case was taken up in the 114th meeting held on 27.10.2014.
Observations of 114th meeting were conveyed to the PP vide letter No. 1806
dated 07.11.2014.
6. No reply was received from the project proponent inspite of lapse of TWO
YEARS.
7. Whereas final show cause notice was issued to the project proponent vide
letter No. 1554 dated 20.10.2016.
7
8. Whereas PP has not submitted the reply so far in spite of issuing of Final
Show Cause Notice.
9. As per MoEF guidelines No. J-11 013/5/2009-IA-lI (Part) dated 30.10.2012, all
projects where additional information desired has not been submitted even
after 6 months of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting should be
de-listed from the list of pending projects.
The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the Authority had
elaborate discussions on the subject and needs more time. Therefore, the case has
been deferred.
Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential PlottedColony at Sector-29, 30, 32 & 33, Tehsil-Sohna, District-Gurgaon,Haryana by M/s St. Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 19.11.2015 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 153rd meeting held on 07.06.2017 recommended this project
for environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area 426566.3084 sqm (105.4083)2. Built up area 243038 sqm3. License Valid up 19.06.20194. Nos. of Towers 2 basements + S + 14 Floors, the project
comprise of 430 no. main plots, 158 no. ofEWS plots, 197 no. of NPNL plots, 3 no.Nursery School, 2 no. of Primary School,2 no. of Nursing Home & CommunityCentre.
5. Height 15 Meter 6. Green belt 31.38%7. Water requirement 2279 KLD8. Fresh Water 974 KLD9. Waste Water 1371 KLD10. STP Capacity 1700 KLD11 Power Requirement 6149.02 KW DHBVN12. Solid Waste 6536 kg/day 13. ECS 516 ECS 14. RWH 63 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding
non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
DG sets :
Total Capacity of the DG sets is 4415 KVA are 10 in no. PP may submit
the total quantity of diesel required for daily operations, its storage, safety
8
measures to be taken & an undertaking regarding the statutory
compliances, if required
Form 1A :
Pt. 5.1/5.2/5.3 has not been explained properly and complete data under 5.1 to
be provided
Water Balance Chart
Water is a scarce resource; measures should be taken to conserve it
1.1KLD for Tyre washing, provide “Water Trough” at entry & exit.
Miscellaneous water consumption, sprinkling of water would it be on daily
basis?
Incorporate the guidelines of MoEF&CC for “Water Use Reduction” as
shown in table 2.4 .
Resubmit the separate “Water Balance Charts” for each season.
Submit the affidavit stating not to discharge untreated water in public sewer
& till the time sewer is not provided PP will make all the arrangements to
manage/dispose the discharge at their own as per the guidelines of State
Pollution Control Board/ MoEF&CC.
Traffic Density at Sohna road :
The Project Proponent states that the carrying capacity of Sohna road is enough &
“Level of service” shown is very good (0.265), practically it doesn’t seem so.
OWC:
The Project Proponent shall submit the Location of “OWC” on the lay-out plan.
Plantation:
Canopy area 25 mt2 means distance between 2 trees cannot be less than 5.6 mts.
Make the plantation plan accordingly.
Base Level data for PM2.5 shown from March to May 2016, max.is
57.2/52.7/69.2/63.1/77.0/83.8 µg/mt3(pg no. 102)
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded to project proponent
provided they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations
within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies
of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter
shall be issued.
Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony atSector-114, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon, Haryanaby M/s KST Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The case was taken up in 153rd meeting of SEAC and unanimous view that
this is a case of violation as already observed by SEAC in earlier meetings and
9
SEAC is of the unanimous view that this case may be referred to SEIAA for taking
appropriate action in the matter in terms of notification dated 14.03.2017.
In the today’s meeting the brief history of the case has been gone through as
per following:
The case came up for appraisal for SEAC and the committee decided for the
site visit before the appraisal and the visiting team found irregularities i.e.
temporary shed, some another construction being used by their office and some
excavation.
On the basis of the site visit SEAC recommended for prosecution.
The case was considered in 88th meeting of SEIAA on 29.02.2016 and decided
that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra,
Members SEAC would inspect the project area site in order to access the status of
construction if any and submit the report to the SEIAA. The report submitted by
the sub-committee was considered in 94th meeting of SEIAA held on 11.08.2016 and
according they found the following points:
(i) A Temporary tin shed in one corner of the site away from the main
building.
(ii) A small construction (209 sqmt.), approved by STP Gurgaon which is to be
demolished at the time of project.
(iii) Excavation found and reported which project proponent claims that were
not done by them rather farmers dug and took away the earth.
On the basis of above written report SEIAA directed to SEAC for appraisal
but SEAC again recommended prosecution. This case was constantly sent back and
forth approximately 3-4 times and finally the case was appraised with the
recommendation for prosecution leaving the decision at SEIAA.
In the case of Glomore Construction and Ors. Vs. The Union of India &Ors
the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has said that in case the construction purposed to
be carried out in less than 20,000 sqmt area without obtaining the environmental
clearance, it does not tantamount to violation of environmental clearance.
As per statement given by project proponent to the sub-committee “that
excavation was done by farmer”. In any case the excavation was far less than 20,
000 sqmt. When a built-up area less than 20, 000 sqmt, it can be built up without
prior environment clearance. How this small excavation can be treated as violation?
It is therefore considered opinion of the Authority that the activities taken up by the
project proponent cannot be treated as violation by any stretch of imagination.
In view of the above discussion it was decided by the authority to grant
Environment Clearance to the project.
10
Item No.[14] Revised EC for Expansion: Construction/Development of proposedIndependent Floors/Plots in Residential Plotted Colony “Privana”DLF Garden City, Sector 76 & 77, Village Kherki Daula & Shikohpur,Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DLF Utilities Ltd.
1. Whereas application for Environmental Clearance was received by the
SEIAA, Haryana on 08.12.2014 and the same was transferred to the SEAC,
Haryana for the appraisal.
2. Whereas case was taken up for the approval of Terms of Reference in the
118th meeting of SEAC held on 19.02.2015 and ToRs were conveyed to you vide
letter No. 2049 dated 10.03.2015. The PP submitted the EIA report on 31.08.2015.
3. Whereas case was taken up for the appraisal in the 127th meeting of SEAC
held on 15.02.2016 and the observations of 127th were conveyed to you vide letter
No. 646 dated 24.02.2016.
4. No reply was received from the project proponent inspite of lapse of EIGHT
MONTHS.
5. Whereas final show cause notice was issued to the project proponent vide
letter No. 1551 dated 20.10.2016.
6. Whereas PP has not submitted the reply so far inspite of issuing of Final Show
Cause Notice.
7. As per MoEF guidelines No. J-11 013/5/2009-IA-lI (Part) dated 30.10.2012, all
projects where additional information desired has not been submitted even
after 6 months of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting should be
de-listed from the list of pending projects.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light
of guidelines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-
2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 18.12.2014
submitted application for Revised EC for Expansion: Construction/Development of
proposed Independent Floors/Plots in Residential Plotted Colony “Privana” DLF
Garden City, Sector 76 & 77, Village Kherki Daula & Shikohpur, Gurgaon,
Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra,
Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with
the decision that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated
above within 15 days period.
Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up GroupHousing (15.280 Acres) at Sector-35, Village Mohammadpur Gurjar,Tehsil Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Faith Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
11
The SEAC in its 153rd meeting held on 07.06.2017 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In
the absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for
the environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light
of guidelines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-
2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 10.10.2014
submitted application for Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up
Group Housing (15.280 Acres) at Sector-35, Village Mohammadpur Gurjar, Tehsil
Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana.
“The project proponent has submitted a request on 27.06.2017. The PP request
in his application that recently with the implementation of Haryana Building
code 2017 and new govt. policies implemented by Haryana such as New
Integrated Licensing Policy (NILP) & Transit Oriented Development (TOD), the
planning of the project revised as per the new Building code/norms. The PP
requested to grant the extension of time for environment clearance appraisal for
the above said project”.
After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to refer back this case to the
SEAC with the advice that the case should be appraised as per request made by
project proponent.
Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for construction of Lalit Suri Education &Charitable Trust, Food craft complex, Badkhal road, Faridabad,Haryana by M/s The Lalit Suri Education & Charitable Trust.
1. Whereas application for Environmental Clearance was received by the
SEIAA, Haryana on05.08.2014 and the same was transferred to the SEAC,
Haryana for the appraisal.
2. Whereas case was taken up in the 112th meeting of SEAC held on 19.09.2014
and observationswere conveyed to you vide letter No. 1696 dated 26.09.2014.
3. No reply was received from the project proponent inspite of lapse of TWO
YEARS.
4. Whereas final show cause notice was issued to the project proponent vide
letter No. 1552 dated20.10.2016.
5. Whereas PP has not submitted the reply so far inspite of issuing of Final Show
Cause Notice.
6. As per MoEF guidelines No. J-11 013/5/2009-IA-lI (Part) dated 30.10.2012, all
projects whereadditional information desired has not been submitted even
12
after 6 months of the ExpertAppraisal Committee (EAC) meeting should be
de-listed from the list of pending projects.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light
of guidelines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-
2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated
05.08.2014submitted application for construction of Lalit Suri Education &
Charitable Trust, Food craft complex, Badkhal road, Faridabad, Haryana.The
Authority decided that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC
shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:
(i) Status of construction in the project if any.
In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with
the decision that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall
visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated
above within 15 days period.
Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up GroupHousing (20.056 Acres) at Sector-35, Village MohammadpurGurjar,Tehsil Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Faith Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC in its 153rd meeting held on 07.06.2017 has recommended to de-list
this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital
information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In
the absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for
the environmental clearance.
The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light
of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-
2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 10.10.2014
submitted application for Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up
Group Housing (20.056 Acres) at Sector-35, Village Mohammadpur Gurjar, Tehsil
Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana.
“The project proponent has submitted a request on 27.06.2017. The PP request
in his application that recently with the implementation of Haryana Building
code 2017 and new govt. policies implemented by Haryana such as New
Integrated Licensing Policy (NILP) & Transit Oriented Development (TOD), the
planning of the project revised as per the new Building code/norms. The PP
requested to grant the extension of time for environment clearance appraisal for
the above said project”.
After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to refer back this case to the
SEAC with the advice that the case should be appraised as per request made by
project proponent.
13
Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of ResidentialPlotted Colony with Group Housing Colony at Village-Fatehpur,Admapur, Tikri&Jharsa at Sector-47 & 50, Gurgaon, Haryana byM/s Malibu Estate Pvt. Ltd.
The SEAC was considered this case in its 153rd meeting held on 29.06.2017.
During discussion, it was revealed that project proponent has already started the
construction without obtaining prior environmental clearance which amounts to
violation of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. The fact apparently was brought
before the Committee on reference to the project proposal.
The Committee again went through the latest Notification dated 14.03.2017
relating to Consideration of proposals for ToRs/Environment Clearance involving
violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986/Environment Impact
Assessment(EIA) Notification, 2006 which clearly states that in case the project or
activities required prior Environmental Clearance under Environmental Impact
Assessment Notification, 2006 from the concerned Regulatory Authority are brought
for Environmental Clearance after starting the construction work, or have
undertaking expansion, modernization and change in product mix without prior
Environmental Clearance , these projects shall be treated as cases of violation and in
such cases, even Category B projects which are granted environmental clearance by
the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority constituted under sub-
section(3) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 shall be apprised
for grant of environmental clearance only by the Expert Appraisal Committee and
the Environmental Clearance will be granted at the Central level.
In the today’s meeting the Authority decided that this case may be sent to
MoEF & CC, GoI as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017.
ItemNo.[19] Environmental Clearance for construction of “IndustrialWarehousing/Storage/Logistics Project” at Faizabad, District-Jhajjar,Haryana by M/s Indospace Industrial Park Badli Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 21.07.2016 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 154th meeting held on 29.06.2017 recommended this project
for environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area 449175.1554 sqm2. Built up area 129779 sqm3. CLU Issue 28.12.20164. No. of Buildings 8 (units 15 Nos.)5. Amenities Project shall be used for storage of
Electronics, Electrical and consumerdurables, FMCG retail products,automobiles accessories/spare parts andagricultural
14
6. Height 17.8 Meter 7. Green belt 20%8. Water requirement 163 KLD9. Fresh Water 53 KLD10. Waste Water 113 KLD11 STP Capacity 150 KLD12. Power Requirement 3500 KVA UHBVN13. Solid Waste 415 kg/day 14. ECS 419 trucks (for loading/unloading of
material) and 838 other vehicles.15. RWH 59 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding
non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
Pt.2.1(pg no.29):
Water requirement to be met with Borewell Supply. Receipt of no permission from
CGWB is attached; quantity of water to be extracted & size of bore wells not
mentioned
Pt. 2.9:
Says there will be no Ground water Extraction in contradiction to pt. 2.1. Explain is
required on this point.
Pt. 1.23(pg no. 10):
Treated water from HUDA STP is available; therefore, same can be used in
Horticulture (pg no.59) also, thereby, saving the precious water. Resubmit the
“Water Balance Charts” for all three seasons separately
Pg. no. 103;
PM10& PM2.5at Faizabad reported to be 147.1 & 80.3 µg/m3; very much on the
higher side and project being the Industrial park leading to additional movement of
vehicles therefore, PP is asked to take adequate measures to prevent the air
pollution from increased Traffic movement
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15
days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter
shall be issued.
Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Affordable Group Housing colony at village Dharampur Sector-107, District Gurgaon, Haryana byM/s Signatures Builders Pvt. Ltd.
15
1. The project proponent submitted application on 28.03.2017 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 154th meeting held on 29.06.2017 recommended this project
for environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area Existing 24786.957 sqm (6.125 Acres)
Expansion 12140.544 sqm (3 Acres)Total 36927.50 sqm (9.125 acres)
2. Built up area Existing 64015.082 sqmExpansion 38788.618 sqmTotal 102803.7 sqm
3. License Valid up 17.06.20194. No. of Towers 12 Towers + GF + 14 Floors, 2 Storage
Tanks, community Hall, Creach andAnganwadi, Convenient shopping/commercial
5. No. of Dwelling unit 1454 DU6. Height 44.8 Meter 7. Green belt 20.49%8. Water requirement 1096 KLD9. Fresh Water 680 KLD10. Waste Water 909 KLD11 STP Capacity 1091 KLD12. Power Requirement 4696.4 KW DHBVN13. Solid Waste 4090 kg/day 14. Parking 728 ECS15. RWH 2 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding
non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
Water balance Chart
Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF&CC for “Water Use Reduction”
DG sets of capacity (2x250+1x380)KVA, such capacity can be air-cooled.
Conserve Water & Energy
Location & Carrying capacity of External sewer.
Submit the affidavit stating not to discharge untreated water in public sewer
& till the time sewer is not provided PP will make all the arrangements to
manage/dispose the discharge at their own as per the guidelines of State
Pollution Control Board/ MoEF&CC.
Pt. 8.3;
16
“Fly ash will be used for Road Construction”;What measures would be undertaken
to control the air pollution arising by on-site transportation/storage & use of Fly-
ash?
Base Level Concentration of PM10&PM2.5(max.) observed in document 197.2 & 87.6
µg/m3respectively, is already on the higher side , therefore, PP is asked to take
adequate measures to prevent the air pollution due to the increased traffic
circulation .
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15
days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter
shall be issued.
Item No.[21]Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing
Colony at Village-Gadoli Khurd and Gadoli Kalan, Sector-37 D,
District Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Signature Global (India) Pvt. Ltd.
1. The project proponent submitted application on 01.04.2017 for seeking
environment clearance for the project as indicated above.
2. The SEAC in its 154th meeting held on 29.06.2017 recommended this project
for environment clearance in the following terms.
Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area 39260.768 sqm (9.70 Acres)2. Built up area 90247.64 sqm3. License Valid up 01.02.2022
No. of towers/blocks 11 no. + Commercial, Gf+ 26 Floors 4. Amenities 1448 Dwelling units, 1 commercial
building, 1 Community Hall,1Aanganwadi
5. Height 81 Meter 6. Green belt 27.8%7. Water requirement 1059 KLD8. Fresh Water 662 KLD9. Waste Water 867 KLD10. STP Capacity 1060 KLD11 Power Requirement 5020 KW DHBVN12. Solid Waste 3449 kg/day 13. Parking 770 ECS and 1540 Scooter14. RWH 10 pits
The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the
today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,
quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding
non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic
circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:
17
Water Balance chart:
DG cooling 1KLD; capacity of DG sets is 380 & 400 KVA, air-cooled DG sets
may be installed to conserve water & energy
Filter Back-wash: 15 KLD where this filter is deployed? No need of cooling
tower & submitted plan does not have any provisions for HVAC
Submit the affidavit stating not to discharge untreated water in public sewer
& till the time sewer is not provided PP will make all the arrangements to
manage/dispose the discharge at their own as per the guidelines of State
Pollution Control Board/ MoEF & CC
Form 1A:
pt. 5.1/5.2/5.3 not elaborated properly and complete data be provided under
pt.5.1
Pt. 9.1; “Assumed Power Consumption” per sq. ft. of the built-up area.
On site “Base Level concentration” of PM10/PM2.5 shown to be 176.2/100.2
µg/m3, much higher than the NAAQS, therefore, PP is asked to take adequate
measures to prevent the air pollution due to the increased traffic circulation
In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the
recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent
submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15
days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of
information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter
shall be issued.
Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for proposed expansion of isolated storage
terminal with additional storage tanks (1 x 8620 KL for MS; 3 x 20000
KLD for HSD and 2 x 70 KL of Bo-diesel) at Rewari Terminal,
Haryana by M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited.
The SEAC has recommended this project for approval of TOR subject to
stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for expansion of
isolated storage terminal with additional storage tanks (1 x 8620 KL for MS; 3 x
20000 KLD for HSD and 2 x 70 KL of Bo-diesel) at Rewari Terminal, Haryana.
In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it
was decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA report by using Model
Terms of Reference of MoEF & CC along-with the following additional terms of
reference:
1. The PP should comply the guidelines of Ministry of Petroleum regarding
distance from the Highway, District Headquarters and other Habitations, in
case distance is not as per the guidelines of Ministry of Petroleum then this
TOR will become invalid.
18
2. The PP to adopt rain water harvesting plan only for the rooftop and shed,
water will be properly channelized to the recharge structure.
3. The PP will give existing green belt plan and new green belt plan with
Calculations.
4. The PP should submit the schemes for oil water separator.
5. The PP should submit the schemes for ETP.
6. The PP should submit the schemes for STP.
7. The PP should comply the norms of BS-IV for their loading trucks.
8. The PP should submit the fire permission from Petroleum and Explosives
Safety Organisation, Nagpur.
9. The PP should submit the schemes for zero discharge.
10. The PP should submit the details of source of water and availability.
11. The PP should submit the inspection report of MoEF.
12. The PP should submit undertaking for construction norms.
ADDITIONAL AGENDA
Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for setting up Commercial Complex (3.8625
Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s Commander Realtors Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 101st meeting of SEIAA held on 22.03.2017 and
the case was deferred with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj
Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC would visit the site for inspection and shall submit
the report on the point as indicated above within 30 days period.
The Project Proponent vide letter dated 06.04.2017 submitted the reply and
the committee submitted the report on 21.07.2017 which was discussed in the
today’s meeting.
On the basis of the satisfactory reply to the queries and site visit report and
with the recommendation of SEAC it is decided to accord Environment Clearance
to this project.
Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project- EDGE
Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,
Haryana by M/s S.A. Infratech Pvt. Ltd.
The case was considered in the 102ndmeeting of SEIAA held on 20.04.2017 and
the case was deferred with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. Shri Raj
Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the
report on the point as indicated above within 15 days period.
19
The committee submitted the report on 21.07.2017 and submitted the
following:
1. The said project is being developed into phase (I&II). Both these projects are
adjacent & contagious each other.
2. The project proponent had obtained Environmental Clearance for only Phase
I of the project.
3. Phase II consisting of Residential Towers & allied facilities has been
constructed without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance.
The representative of the project proponent were asked by the committee
members to submit a layout plan indicating the exact scope & size of construction
executed without obtaining prior EC. They were also asked to submit an affidavit in
this regard to the SEIAA office within 4 days. However these documents have not
been submitted by the project proponent.
Conclusion
From the above it is evident that the project has been constructed without
obtaining prior Environmental Clearance. It is recommended that action as per the
law may be taken.
In the today’s meeting it was noticed that as per the report submitted by the
committee the project proponent has already started the construction in Phase-II
without obtaining prior environmental clearance which amounts to violation of EIA
Notification dated 14.09.2006. The fact was brought before the Committee who visited
the site.
The Authority gone through the latest Notification dated 14.03.2017
regarding the Consideration of proposals for ToRs/Environment Clearance
involving violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986/Environment Impact
Assessment(EIA) Notification, 2006 which clearly states that in case the project or
activities required prior Environmental Clearance under Environmental Impact
Assessment Notification, 2006 from the concerned Regulatory Authority are brought
for Environmental Clearance after starting the construction work, or have
undertaking expansion, modernization and change in product mix without prior
Environmental Clearance , these projects shall be treated as cases of violation and in
such cases, even Category B projects which are granted environmental clearance by
the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority constituted under sub-
section(3) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 shall be apprised
for grant of environmental clearance only by the Expert Appraisal Committee and
the Environmental Clearance will be granted at the Central level.
20
In view of the above, Authority decided that this case may be sent to MoEF &
CC, GoI as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017.
Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony located at villageNangliUmarpur, Sector -62, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Emaar MGFLand Limited.
The case was considered in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on 21.06.2017
and the case was deferred with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N.
Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and
shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
The Project Proponent and the committee submitted the reply/report on
21.07.2017 which was discussed in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that in the
last meeting of SEIAA the project proponent was asked to give the exact capacity of
DG sets to be installed and the water required for the cooling of DG sets along with
the incorporation of MoEF Guidelines for the water use reduction as table 2.4.
Further project proponent was asked to explain certain points in Form IA. The
project proponent in their reply has stated that the proposed capacity of DG sets
would be (2x1500 + 1x500) KVA for phase-I and (2x 1010 + 1x 380) KVA for Phase –
II and all the DG sets would be air cooled thus requiring no water for cooling
purposes even given an affidavit in this regard. The project proponent has
incorporated the MoEF Guidelines for water use reduction leading to total water
requirement i.e. (106.44 + 47.5) KLD / (104.44 + 47.5) KLD /(104.04 +47.5) KLD for
summer / monsoon / winter season respectively and submitted an affidavit for the
discharge of excess treated water only to the external sewer provided by the
authorities and will make its own arrangement till the time sewer is not provided by
concerned authorities.
On the basis of the satisfactory reply to the queries; site visit report and the
recommendation/appraisal of SEAC it is decided to accord Environment Clearance
to this project.
Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for Modification /Expansion of environment
clearance for Group Housing Colony project at Village Gwal Pahari,
Sector-2, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Jasmine Buildmart Pvt.
Ltd.
The case was considered in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on 21.06.2017
and the case was deferred with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N.
Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and
shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.
21
The Project Proponent and the committee submitted the reply/report
on21.07.2017 which was discussed in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that in
the last meeting of SEIAA the project proponent was asked to incorporate the
recommendations of MoEF& CC for water use reduction as in table 2.4 and project
proponent was asked to submit the details of background air quality levels with
predicted values based on dispersion models and to elaborate certain points in Form
IA. The project proponent has submitted the reply after incorporating the
recommendations of MoEF on water use reduction leading to fresh water
requirement to 76 KLD. The project proponent has submitted the under taking
regarding discharge of excess treated water only to external sewer to be provided by
the concerned authorities. The project proponent was asked to verify the results
submitted for the particulate matters; project proponent has submitted the report of
the fresh sample taken on 19th July 2017; the values of PM 2.5 shown to be 57.36 and
59.37 µg/m3 and 114.58&121.50 µg/m3 for PM 10 respectively. The project proponent
is suggested to take adequate measure to suppress the particulate matter arising due
to the increase in the volume of traffic circulation.
Lic. No. 105 of 2008 dtd. 15/05/2008 granted to project proponent for setting up a
“Group Housing Colony” falling in the revenue estate of vill.-Gawal Pahari, sector-
3, Gurgaon has been renewed till 14/05/2018 by the Directorate of Town & Country
Planning, Haryana.
On the basis of the satisfactory reply to the queries, site visit report and with
the recommendation/appraisal of SEAC it is decided to accord Environment
Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.
*****