Download - 050920175AZND3KMminutesof83-105th.pdf - Environmental ...

1

Minutes of the 83rd meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 28.09.2015, under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),

Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2

Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated

14.9.2006.

The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for

Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter

No. 390-392 dated 17.09.2015 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-

Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for Extension & Expansion of “Residential

Plotted Colony” located at Sector 36-39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s

Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd.

The project proposal along with observations of SEAC was lastly considered in

the 79th meeting of SEIAA held on 09.01.2015 and it was noticed that the project

proponent on 28.10.2014 submitted application for seeking Extension & Expansion of

validity of Environment Clearance granted by MOEF, GOI vide letter dated 07.01.2008

for construction of “Residential Plotted Colony” located at Sector 36-39, Panipat,

Haryana. The SEAC in its recommendation has reported that the compliance report

issued by RO, MOEF, GOI dated 21.08.2014 shows that the work is quite incomplete and

completion certificate for only a part of the project has been issued on 10.02.2014. The

EC already granted was valid up to 06.01.2013 and any work executed afterwards

tantamount to violation of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. The SEAC has

recommended that this case may be decided at the level of SEIAA.

It was noticed that the project site was monitored by RO, MOEF on 24.04.2014

and as per compliance report the status of construction of the already granted EC project

is as under:

1. Road network Completed

2. Sewer line 100%

3. Storm line Completed

4. Electricity network Completed

5. Underground tanks for water storage Completed

6. Plantation 80%

7. Parks development 23 parks are completed and 9 parks are under

development

8. Plots sold out 85%

9. Villas 16 are complete

Status of other building in given below:-

1. Nursery School Yet to be started

2. Primary School Yet to be started

3. High School Yet to be started

4. Creche Yet to be started

5. Dispensary Yet to be started

6. Religious places Yet to be started

7. EWS 163 plots have been handed over to Housing Board,

Haryana which are under construction

8. Club Under construction

9. Taxi Stand Yet to be started

2

It was also found that the project proponent has not forwarded the proper

documents pertaining to this project to the member. The Authority decided that the matter

regarding consideration of expansion of project can be considered only after the matter

regarding grant of extension to the validity of EC granted is sorted out. Accordingly the

Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be

asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15 days or before next

meeting.

[1] The project proponent shall supply copy of updated Form I, Form IA, conceptual

plan and certified copy of compliance report to the members of SEIAA for

consideration of their case for extension of validity of environment clearance.

[2] The project proponent shall give the justified reasons for delay in submission of

application for extension of validity of EC.

[3] The project proponent shall give the justified reasons for not completing the

project within validity of EC.

[4] The project proponent shall clarify why the development of public utility services

were not taken up along with the development of residential plots.

[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with authenticated proof that

no construction was taken up at the site after the expiry of validity of EC.

The project proponent on 16.02.2015 submitted the reply which could not be taken

up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was

transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking needful action. No action was taken

by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on

31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.

The reply dated 16.02.2015 was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.

The Authority was of the view that the recommendation made by SEAC are not clear and

do not state that no construction has taken place after the expiry of validation of

Environment Clearance letter. Accordingly, the Authority decided to refer back this case

to SEAC with the advice to re-appraise the case and may communicate a clear opinion in

this case.

Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Proposed ‘Group Housing Scheme’ at

village- Rewazpur, Sector- 89, Faridabad, Haryana by M/S Ferrous

Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 81st meeting of SEIAA

held on 18.02.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred with the decision that the

project proponent shall submit solar path analyses ensuring that the orientation of the

building is proper and the sun light will be available to the proposed dwelling units.




3



The reply dated 20.02.2015 submitted by project proponent was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:

1. The comments of SEAC should be taken on the information dated 20.02.2015

submitted by the project proponent.

2. The height of building is 63 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance

from the recognize institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering

College/National Institute of Technology etc regarding structural stability and for

fire safety clearance from institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The

project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to the SEAC.

3. The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking

calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the project

proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted for

treatment of bio-degradable waste.

4. As per point no. 31(vi)of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an

undertaking stating that:

“Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of building is more than 60

meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high rise

building shall also be made”.

After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the advice to re-appraise the project proposal in terms of deficiencies pointed out

above and send its recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the

Notification.

Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony

(11.362 acres) in the revenue estate of Village Daula, Sector-49,

Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Pyramid Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 79th meeting of SEIAA


project proponent shall submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15 days

or before next meeting.

[1] The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan showing

separate Exit ramp from basement.

[2] The project proponent shall submit soft copy and hard copy of the solar path

analysis.




4







2. The height of building is 113.80 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance

















Notification.


(2.5625 acre) located in the Revenue Estate of Village Gurgaon,

Sector-3, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Santur Realtor Pvt. Ltd.



project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations

within 15 days or before next meeting.

[1] The project proponent shall seek clarification from competent Authority regarding

no objection about the existence of entry and exit gate as proposed in the plan

under the 66 KV HT line.

[2] The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan showing 6

meter wide ramp instead of 4 meter.




5




consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed

to submit clarification from the authorised competent authority of Electricity department.

The project proponent should submit clarification from the competent authority of

electricity department as was desired by the Authority and further observed that:

1. The SEAC should examine the revise traffic circulation plan submitted by project

proponent vide letter dated 09.03.2015.

2. The project proponent shall obtain clarification from the competent authority of

electricity department and shall submit the same to SEAC.





4. The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non

applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra no.

indicated the license.




Notification.

Item No. [5] Revised EC Proposed Group Housing Project “The Ultima” (22.231

acres) at Sector-81, Village-Lakhnola, Gurgaon by M/s DLF Homes

Developers Ltd.


held on 22.01.2015. In this meeting the case was deferred on the request of project

proponent with the decision that the project proponent shall submit permission of

competent authority for use of revenue rasta for laying of services line.








to submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta. The project

proponent should submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta as

was desired by the Authority and further observed that:

6

1. The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of

revenue rasta and shall submit the same to SEAC.






from the recognized institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering







Notification.

Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Complex namely

“Ansal Heights” at Sector-92, Village- Wazirpur, Tehsil & Distt.

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd.



project proponent shall submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta

for laying of services line.








to submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta. The project

proponent should submit permission of competent authority for use of revenue rasta as

was desired by the Authority and further observed that:

1. The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of






7







Notification.

Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for the commercial complex project –

Spaze Buziness Park, Sector-66, Village- badshahpur, District-

Gurgaon by M/S KAY KAY Designer Towers Pvt. Ltd.


held on 22.01.2015, wherein it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the



[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license.

The project proposal could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse

of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for

taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case

was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.

The case was taken up in the today’s meeting and it was observed that the project

proponent has failed to submit copy of re-validated license and further observed that:

1. The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license to the SEAC.











Notification.

Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for the proposed commercial colony INXT

CITY CENTER at village Shikopur, Sector-83, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Trishul Industries.



8



[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of validated license.







consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has

submitted copy of revalidated license. The Authority has further observed that:

1. The project proponent has not submitted assurance of water supply from

competent authority and shall obtain the same and submit the same to SEAC.

2. The project proponent has not submitted assurance of power supply from


3. The project proponent shall obtain copy of valid accreditation certificate issued by

NABET/QCI in respect of EIA consultant engaged by them and submit the same

to the SEAC.




5. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking declaring that no

construction has been started at the site along with photograph to the SEAC.




treatment of bio-degradable waste




Notification.

Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for the Project “Vatika Express City”

Resedential plotted Colony on total land measuring 100.875 acres

located in the revenue estate of village Harsaru, Hayatpur, Sector-

88A and 88B, Distt-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vatika Ltd.



9



[1] The project proponent shall submit self contained note with authenticated proof

about the shifting of HT lines and showing that the vacant unplanned pockets in

the licensed area are actually affected by the existence of HT lines. The proposed

plan of the said un planned pocket areas, once HT lines are shifted.

[2] The project proponent shall submit revised green belt development plan

earmarking space of make provision for green-park for the residents as per

assurance given in the meeting.

[3] The project proponent shall provide Old age home on 0.25 acre of licensed area

and shall submit a plan.

[4] The project proponent shall submit dual plumbing plan showing layout of infra

structure facilities without crossing revenue rasta.

















4. The project proponent shall submit revised green belt development plan

earmarking space of make provision for green-park for the residents as the same

has not been submitted.




Notification.

10

Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT/Cyber Park located

at Industrial Sector 19, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Dominant Offset

Ltd.





[1] The project proponent shall submit NOC from Airport Authority.

[2] The project proponent shall submit copy of validated license.








submitted NOC from AAI regarding height clearance but failed to submit copy of

revalidated license. The Authority and further observed that:

1. The project proponent shall obtain copy of revalidated license and shall submit the

same to SEAC.











Notification.

Item No. [11] Environmental Clearance for the development of Industrial Estate

and CETP at I.E. Barhi, Phase-III near Gannaur, District –

Sonepat, Haryana by HSIIDC.



project proponent may be asked to submit permission for withdrawal of ground water

from CGWA within 30 days.

The case could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due to lapse of its term

on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of India for taking

11

needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and the case was

transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.

The case was taken up in the today’s meeting and it was observed that the project

proponent has failed to submit the permission for withdrawal of Ground water.




Notification.

Item No. [12] Environmental Clearance for expansion of existing Panipat Institute

of Engineering and Technology 70 milestone, Pattikalayana,

Smalkha, Panipat. (Developed by Vidyapeeth Educational Trust) by

Panipat Institute of Engineering &Technology.


held on 09.01.2015. It was observed that the SEAC has recommended this project for

Environmental Clearance subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has

proposed the expansion of existing Panipat Institute of Engineering and Technology 70

milestone, Pattikalayana, Smalkha, Panipat. (Developed by Vidyapeeth Educational

Trust) with the proposal as given under:

Particulars Existing Expansion Total

Total Plot Area 21032.72 sqm 33005 sqm 54037.72 sqm

Built up area 18962.16 sqm 22177.84 sqm 41139 sqm

Ground Coverage 8060.04 sqm 4519.25 sqm 12579.29 sqm

Details of Blocks

Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,

7, 8, 9, 10, 14, 17

Block A, A, B & C

Existing = 12 +

Proposed = 4

Height 21 m - 21 m

Green Area 11416 sqm 11188.683 sqm 22604.683 sqm

Total water requirement 300 KLD 251.25 KLD 551.25 KLD

Fresh water requirement 127.4 KLD 152.6 KLD 280 KLD

Waste water generation 121.43 KLD 148.53 KLD 270 KLD

STP Capacity 141.05KLD 168.95 KLD 310 KLD

Power requirement 184.496 KW 265.498 KW 449.994 KW

RWH pits 6 pits 9 pits 15 pits

Solid waste management 1760 kg/day 3944 kg/day 5704 kg/day

Proposed parking 3371.94 sqm 2726.26 sqm 6098.20 sqm

The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up in the meeting of SEIAA due

to lapse of its term on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF&CC Govt. of

India for taking needful action. No action was taken by MoEF&CC Govt. of India and

the case was transferred to SEIAA, Haryana on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.

The case was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The project

proposal was examined in terms of MoEF &CC Govt. of India amended Notification S.O

3252(E) dated 22.12.2014, providing exemption to the project from obtaining

environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.

12

The members of Authority were having different opinion based on their

interpretation of the amended notification. However Chairman SEIAA concluded the

discussions with the remarks, the text of which is as under:

“I am of considered opinion that nobody should sit upon the matter, where it

ceased to have jurisdiction. This application was received on 30.09.2014 and more than

one year period has passed still we are reluctant to dispose of the matter. This is eloquent

testimony of our thinking. It is crystal clear neither SEIAA nor SEAC has any

jurisdiction, in view of MOEF & CC, GOI Notification S.O.3252(E) dated 22.12.2014

stating that the construction of Industrial Shed, School, College, Hostel for Educational

Institutions and Universities are now not included in the notification but such buildings

shall ensure sustainable environment management, solid and liquid waste management,

rain water harvesting and use of re-cycle material. The MOEF &CC, GOI vide OM 19-

2/2013-IA-III dated 09.06.2015 has also issued guidelines to be followed for building

projects to ensure sustainable environment management by the project proponents before

the start of construction. Abortive efforts were made to have consensus on the matter.

Taking in view the opinion of other two members of SEIAA, the case is remanded

back to SEAC for deciding the case as per MOEF GOI Notification dated 22.12.2014”.

Item No. [13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Hotel Project at Sector-60,

Gurgaon by M/s Toucan Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC was lastly considered in the 82nd meeting of

SEIAA held on 09.03.2015. It is observed that the SEAC has recommended this project

for Environmental Clearance subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent

has proposed expansion of Hotel Project at Sector-60, Gurgaon.

Total Plot Area: 3.17 Acre Total Built up area: 38177 sqm

Modification Details

Particulars Existing as per

EC received

Requested Modification in Existing EC

(with justification)

Built-up Area (m2) 35937 38177

(Additional Area is based on revised

sanctioned plan and compoundable area

permitted under HUDA bye-laws)

No. of Floors in Tower A

(Commercial)

G+5 G+6

(revised sanction has been received from

HUDA & submitted to SEAC)

No. of Floors in Tower B

(Red Fox Hotel)

G+11

(service floor

was sanctioned

by HUDA but

not covered in

EC)

G+S+11



No. of Floors in Tower C

(Lemon Tree Hotel)

G+10

(service floor

was sanctioned

G+S+9



13

by HUDA but

not covered in

EC)

No. of Rooms in Tower B

(Red Fox Hotel)

171 155

No. of Rooms in Tower C

(Lemon Tree Hotel)

126 110

Car Parking 515 463

Laundry Not Proposed Proposed in Lower Basement

(reduced floor area for parking

compensated by provision of double stack

parking)

ETP Not Proposed Proposed (for laundry)

STP capacity 263 KLD 295 KLD





The case was taken up for the consideration in the today’s meeting and the

Authority observed that:

1. The project proponent has not obtained the assurance for water supply from

competent authority. The project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to

the SEAC.

2. The project proponent shall submit proof of having deposited up to date EDC/IDC

paid to the concerned department to the SEAC.











Notification.

Item No. [14] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Project

(20.625 Acres) at Village Ullawas, Sector-60 & 63-A, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s High Responsible Realtors Pvt. Ltd.


SEIAA held on 09.03.2015, wherein It is observed that the project proponent has

submitted copy of letter of Intent dated 05.09.2014 issued by Town and Country Planning

Department for grant of license for the additional area measuring 2.525 acre but the

14

Town and Country Planning Department has not granted license for the same. The

representative of the project proponent submitted a letter requesting to defer their case till

they submit copy of license.





In the today’s meeting the project proposal was taken up for consideration and it

was observed that the project proponent has failed to submit the license for additional

area measuring 2.525 acre. The Authority further observed that:

1. The project proponent shall obtained license for the additional area and shall

submit the same to the SEAC.



indicated the license

3. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of water supply from competent

authority and shall submit the same to the SEAC.

4. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply from competent



















Notification.

15


in the revenue estate of Village Kadarpur & Maidawas, District-

Gurgaon, Sector-63 A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s

Mahamaya Exports Pvt. Ltd.


SEIAA held on 09.03.2015. It was noticed that the SEAC has recommended this project


has proposed the construction of Group Housing Colony in the revenue estate of Village

Kadarpur & Maidawas, District- Gurgaon, Sector-63 A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban

Complex on a total plot area of 56757.071 sqm. The total built up area shall be

143428.761 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 3 Residential towers with

basement, 3 towers of Tower A (S + 19), 4 towers of Tower B (S + 22), 4 towers of

Tower C (G+19), EWS (G + 7), Convenient Shopping (G), Community building (G +1)

& and 2 nursery schools (G + 1). The Group Housing project shall have 686 Dwelling

Units, 124 EWS Units and 84 Domestic servant Units. The maximum height of the

building shall be 71.20 meter. The total water requirement shall be 724 KLD. The fresh

water requirement shall be 419 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 508 KLD,

which will be treated in the STP of 600 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall

be 7985.699 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has

proposed to develop green belt on 44.69% of project area (30% tree plantation + 14.69%

landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 14 rain water harvesting pits.

The solid waste generation will be 2256 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated

in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed

are 1345 ECS.





In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and project details were

taken up for consideration and following observation were made by the Authority:

1. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of water supply from competent


2. The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply from competent

authority and shall submit the same to the SEAC




16

4. The project proponent shall obtain copy of valid accreditation certificate issued by

NABET/QCI in respect of EIA consultant engaged by them and submit the same

to the SEAC.


















Notification.

Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for Affordable group hosing colony (10

acres) in the revenue estate of village Hayatpur, Sector -90, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Aster Infrahome Pvt. Ltd.


SEIAA held on 09.03.2015. It was noticed that the SEAC has recommended this project


has proposed the construction of Affordable group hosing colony (10 acres) in the

revenue estate of village Hayatpur, Sector -90, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of

40519.149 sqm (10 acre). The total built up area shall be 94525.98 sqm. The Group

Housing project shall have 13 residential towers consisting of Tower 1 (Ground+14

Floors), Tower 2 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 3 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 4 (Ground

+14 Floors), Tower 5 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 6 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 7

(Ground +14 Floors), Tower 8 (Ground +9 Floors), Tower 9 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower

10 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 11 (Ground +14 Floors), Tower 12 (Ground +14 Floors),

Tower 13 (Ground +14 Floors), Commercial, community, crèche, etc. The maximum

height of the building shall be 50.35 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1195

KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 799 KLD. The waste water generation shall

be 982 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 1180 KLD capacity. The total power

17

requirement shall be 3510 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 21.54% of project area (15.54% tree

plantation + 6% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 11 rain water

harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 4323 kg/day. The bio-degradable

waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total

parking spaces proposed are 916 ECS.





In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and project details were

taken up for consideration and following observation were made by the Authority:







collection of solid waste and treatment of bio-degradable waste.

3. The project proponent shall ensure the applicability of standards and codes for fire

and safety.




Notification.

**********

1

Minutes of the 84th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority




14.9.2006.




Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for the Proposed Residential Plotted

Colony “SONI PALM CITY” located at Village: Budda Khera,

Sector- 32, 32-A, District- karnal, Haryana by M/s Soni Realtors Pvt.

Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC in this case was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:

1. The project proponent on 18.07.2011 submitted Form 1, Form 1A and Conceptual

plan to the MoEF, GoI for seeking Environmental Clearance under item no. 8(a)

of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 for the proposed residential plotted colony

having total plot area 204022.26 sqm and permissible built up area 22913.5 sqm.

2. The case was transferred to SEIAA on 18.05.2012 after the constitution of 2nd term

of SEIAA on 21.03.2012.

3. The Secretary SEAC advised the project proponent to submit complete

information on the observation as raised in the letter within 30 days vide letter no.

319 dated 09.08.2012. The project proponent failed to submit the reply. The

Secretary SEAC issued final notice for submission of reply within 15 days falling

which the case will be recommended for filling vide letter no. 293 dated

03.06.2013. The project proponent in response to final notice for submission of

reply dated 06.06.2013 issued by Secretary SEAC informed that their project

proposal does not fall under the purview of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 on

the basis of clarification dated 29.11.2011 issued by Regional Office, MOEF GOI

Chandigarh.

4. The SEAC advised the project proponent to give the details of built up area on the

basis of permissible FAR. The SEAC in its 98th meeting held on 09.01.2014 found

that the project proponent has not responded adequately regarding built up area

and forwarded the case on 20.01.2014 to the SEIAA for taking further action.

5. The SEIAA in its 67th meeting held on 28.02.2014 referred back this case to SEAC

with the advice to visit the site in order to assess the latest status of construction

and exact proposed built up area of the project proposal and thereafter send the

recommendation within stipulated period. The case was referred to the SEAC vide

Memo No. SEIAA/HR/14/447 Dated 12.03.2014.

2

6. The SEAC constituted a sub-committee for site inspection. The sub-committee

visited the site on 30.07.2014. The sub-committee reported that as the total built

up area involved is 148807 which is less than 150000 sqmt and as per clarification

given by RO, MOEF GOI, the project does not require environment clearance.

The sub-committee also reported that the development of the project is at an

advanced stage and no violation of any kind had been noticed.

7. The report of the sub-committee was discussed in the 103rd meeting of SEAC held

on 28.04.2014 and the SEAC submitted the case to SEIAA to take a view and

further process accordingly. “As reported in the sub-committee report the case

under consideration is recommended to be filed.”

8. The recommendation of SEAC was considered in the 75th meeting of SEIAA held

on 16.09.2014. It was noticed that the built up area involved is 148807 sqmt and it

was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the advice to appraise this

project under item no. 8(a) and send recommendation on merit. The case was

referred back to SEAC vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/14/1306 dated 17.06.2014.

9. The SEAC in its 117th meeting held on 18.02.2015 considered this case in view of

SEIAA findings and reiterated their stand that project does not need environment

clearance. Since the SEIAA is not accepting the recommendation/views of SEAC.

The SEIAA may seek clarification on the subject from MOEF GOI.

10. No action on the recommendation of SEAC was taken as the term of SEIAA

lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MOEF&CC, GOI. No action

was taken by MOEF&CC, GOI and the case was transferred to SEIAA Haryana

on 31.08.2015 after its reconstitution.

It was observed that the SEAC in its recommendation has reported the clarification

of RO, MOEF&CC GOI Chandigarh dated 29.11.2011 submitted by the project

proponent stating that the project activity does not require environment clearance as the

project activity does not fall under the purview of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. It

was also noticed that the SEIAA in its 75th meeting held on 16.09.2014 decided that as

the built up area involved is 148807 sqm therefore project activity requires environment

clearance under item no. 8 (a) of EIA Notification 14.09.2006. As there was conflict in

opinion regarding applicability of EIA Notification in this case, a decision was taken to

seek clarification from MOEF&CC, GOI in the matter.

Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing

Complex “PSA (6 Acre)” Basai at Sector-37C, Manesar, Gurgaon by

M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for environment clearance subject to the

stipulations stated there in. The recommendation of the SEAC was taken up for

discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 06.11.2012

3

submitted application for seeking clearance for the project. The SEAC in its 118th

meeting held on 03.03.2015 recommended this project for environment clearance. The

recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of SEIAA lapsed

on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No action was taken at

the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on 31.08.2015 after the

reconstitution of SEIAA.

The Authority observed that:

1. The project proponent has submitted license no. 64 of 2011 issued by Town and

Country Planning Department for development of group housing colony on an

area of 17 acres.

2. The SEIAA on the same license had already granted environment clearance for

development of 11 acres of licensed area out of total 17 acre of the licensed area to

M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

3. The environmental clearance to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. was

granted on the recommendation of SEAC. The EC letter was issued on

15.04.2014.

4. The AAI clearance submitted by the M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present

project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

5. The approved zoning plan dated 09.03.2012 submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions

Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech

Services Pvt. Ltd.

6. The NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification

submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the

name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

7. The EDC/IDC receipt submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present


It was observed by the Authority that this case is not fit for consideration as

SEIAA has already granted environmental clearance on the recommendation of the

SEAC to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. and all the vital documents submitted

by the project proponent are in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. to

which EC has already been granted, whereas the application has been submitted by M/s

Prime IT Solution Pvt. Ltd, which is contradictory in terms. It appears that the SEAC has

not considered this fact at all.

In view of the above observations it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by

the Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as

prescribed in the notification.

4

Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for the construction of Group Housing

Colony (14.30 Acres) at Village-Harsaru and Hayatpur, Sector-89 A,

Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.



discussion in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent submitted

application for seeking clearance for the project on 09.01.2014. The SEAC in its 118th







1. Since the height of building is 64.60 meter hence clearance from the recognize

institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering College/National Institute of

Technology etc regarding structural stability and for fire safety clearance from

institute of fire engineers, Nagpur is required. The project proponent shall obtain

the same and submit to the SEAC.




treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit the plan

showing area ear marked for composting.






4. The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper

stating that no construction has been raised at site duly signed by the director. The

project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site.

5. The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for

composting




Notification.

5

Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Commercial

Colony located at Village Dhankot, Sector-102, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Clarion Properties Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance in its 118th

meeting held on 03.03.2015 subject to stipulation stated therein. It was noticed that the

project proponent on 01.09.2014 submitted application for seeking clearance for the

project. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken up by SEIAA as the term of

SEIAA lapsed on 20.03.2015 and the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GOI. No

action was taken at the level of MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was received back on

31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA.

In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC was taken up for

consideration. It was observed that the project proponent has proposed the expansion of

project as under:

Particulars Existing as per EC Expansion Total

Plot area 14,012.24 sqm 9647.76 sqm 23660 sqm

Built up area 39997.30 sqm 31979.70 sqm 71977 sqm

Mxm. height 35 meter 17.2 meter 52.2 meter

Parking 828 ECS 167 ECS 995 ECS

Power req. 3,137 KVA

1423 KVA

4,560 KVA

(DHBVN)

T. Water req. 242 KLD 358 KLD 600 KLD

Domestic water

demand

109 KLD 376 KLD 485 KLD

Fresh water 97 KLD 156 KLD 253 KLD

Waste water 169 KLD 265 KLD 434 KLD

STP capacity 210 KLD 290 KLD 500 KLD

Green area 30% .41% 30.41%

RWH 3 pits 3 pits 6 pits

Solid waste 968 kg/day 1,006 kg/day 1,974 kg/day

Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,

green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of

Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic

circulation etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted the assurance of

HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services

for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon

regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height

clearance. It was found that the calculation of solid waste of the already existing project

6

is not in accordance with the prescribed norms of 500 gram/capita/day. The project

proponent is required to submit revised calculation of solid waste generation of the entire

project @ 500 gram/capita/day. It was also observed that the project proponent has not

earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-

degradable waste.

In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with the

recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing

the following conditions in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to

submission of plan earmarking space for solid waste management within 10 days.

[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 40% of total wall area.

[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on 30.41% of project area.

[3] The project proponent shall not use fresh water for HVAC and DG cooling. Air

based HVAC system should be adopted and only treated water shall be used by

project proponent for cooling, if it is at all needed.

[4] The project proponent shall install solar panel for energy conservation.

[5] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for

composting.

[6] The project proponent shall submit revised solid waste calculation @ 500

gram/capita/day of the entire project.

[7] The project proponent shall obtain assurance of power supply as per prevailing

rules/norms.


located in the revenue estate of Village Sohna, Sector-2 of Sohna,

District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Shree Vardhman Developers Pvt.

Ltd














7




clearance. It was found that the project proponent has not discussed the solid waste

management and also not earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and

treatment of bio-degradable waste. It was also noticed that the project proponent has not

given the dimensions entry and exit ramp of the basement.

In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent shall submit the following information within 15 days

or before the next meeting of Authority.

1. The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also

submit plan earmarking space for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-

degradable waste.

2. The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for

composting.

3. The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan indicating

dimension of entry and exit ramp of basement.

Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group

Housing Colony “Happy Homes” located in the revenue estate of

Village Budena, Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Auric Homes

Pvt. Ltd.
















8




3. The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.




Notification.

Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for the Affordable group housing project

“SRS Palm” Sector -07, Palwal, Haryana by M/s SRS Real Estate

Ltd.








The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable group housing

project “SRS Palm” Sector -07, Palwal, Haryana on a total plot area of 40415.0816 sqm

(9.98 acre). The total built up area shall be 99004.765 sqm. The Group Housing project

shall have 6 Residential towers, Tower A has 9 Pockets (Stilt+14 floors), Tower B has 4

Pockets (Stilt +10 floors), Tower C has 2 Pockets (Stilt+12), Tower D1 has 1 Pocket

(Stilt+9 floors), Tower E1 has 1 Pocket (G+6 floors), Tower F1 has 1 Pocket (Stilt+10

floors), Commercial Complex, Aaganwadi and Community center. The Group Housing

project shall have 733 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be

47.53 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1244 KLD. The fresh water

requirement shall be 830 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1020 KLD, which

will be treated in the STP of 1200 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be

15202 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to

develop green belt on 20.05% of project area (13.99% tree plantation + 6.1%




are 949 ECS.

In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC and the project details were

taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,

quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

9

involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation

etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to

HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system

and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was found that the

project proponent has not earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and




the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to




[3] The project proponent shall essentially provide two numbers of STPs preferably

equivalent to 50% of total capacity or depending upon the initial occupancy as the

case may be.

[4] The project proponent shall submit the plan depicting area clearly ear marked for

composting.


rules/norms.

Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony at village

Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling


















10

clearance. It was found that the project proponent has not discussed the solid waste

management and also not earmarked the space on the plan for collection, segregation and



decision that the project proponent shall submit the following information within 15 days

or before the next meeting of Authority.

1. The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also


degradable waste.




3. The project proponent shall submit the plan depicting area clearly ear marked for

composting.


Housing located at Sector-70A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pyramid

Infratech Pvt. Ltd.











1. The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 18% of the project

area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project proponent

shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015 submitted

revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the same.






11








Notification.

Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony

located at Village Daultabad, Sector-103, Dist. Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Bhagwati Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.








The project Proponent has proposed the construction of Commercial Colony at

Village Daultabad, Sector-103, Dist. Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 12798.163

sqm (3.16 acres). The total built up area shall be 38660.072 sqm. The proposed Project

shall comprise 2 basements + GF+ 12 floors. The maximum height of the building shall

be 58.5 meter. The total water requirement shall be 100 KLD. The fresh water

requirement shall be 29 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 89 KLD, which will

be treated in the separate STP of 110 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be

3305.88 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed

to develop green belt on 29.25% of project area (14.25% tree plantation + 15%




are 539 ECS.

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration. Detailed

discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green belt

development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli

Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation

etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply

of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of

water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non

12

applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It

was noticed that the project proponent was has given undertaking that no construction

shall be raised in the ROW reserved for HT line passing through the project area. It was

also noticed that the project proponent has not earmarked the space for solid waste

management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable

waste.











[5] The project proponent shall ensure that the plinth level of the building block

to be 1.5 meter above 100 years flood level of the said Najafgarh Jheel.

[6] The project proponent shall obtain NOC from HUDA as well as Irrigation

Department before the start of construction, regarding possible adverse effect

of project proposal on the said Najafgarh Jheel.

[7] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW

reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and

shall maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity

Rules, 1956/DHBVN latest instructions.

[8] The project proponent shall submit plan depicting the area ear marked for

composting.


rules/norms.


Housing Colony Project located in the revenue estate of Village

Badshahpur, Sector 69/70 Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex,

District Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Premium Infratech Pvt. Ltd.






13



The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of

Affordable Group Housing Colony Project located in the revenue estate of Village

Badshahpur, Sector 69/70 Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex, District Gurgaon on a total

plot area of 20512.47 sqm. The total built up area shall be 44960.12 sqm. The Group

Housing project shall have 7 Residential blocks, Block 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 Type A (GF+14

floors), Block 1 of Type- B (GF + 4 floors), Commercial area (GF + 1 floor), Community

Hall & Creche (GF+ 3 floors) etc. The Group Housing project shall have Block 1 to 6 of

Type A (714 DUs) and Type B (40 DUs). The maximum height of the building shall be

44.85 meter. The total water requirement shall be 543 KLD. The fresh water requirement

shall be 363 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 445 KLD, which will be treated in

the STP of 540 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3769 KVA which

will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt

on 20% of project area (15% tree plantation + 5% landscaping). The Project Proponent

proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be

1958 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting

appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 415 ECS.


discussions were held regarding existence of revenue rasta, water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the

assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA

for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC

from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from

AAI regarding height clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has not

earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for collection,

segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.





[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20% of the project area.


14



case may be.

[4] The project proponent shall ensure that no construction activity is undertaken

either on surface or below or above surface of revenue rasta passing through the

project area.

[5] The project proponent shall indicate the width and length of revenue rasta passing

through the project area on sign board and shall display the same at both the ends

of revenue rasta stretch, for awareness of public. Sign board shall also display the

message that this is a public rasta/road and any citizen can use it. There shall not

be any gate with or without guards on revenue rasta further project proponent shall

not encroach revenue rasta and shall not cross internal roads over revenue rasta.


composting.


measuring 13.2118 Acres at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, Dpistrict

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd.






















15










Notification.


Housing Colony Project at Village Sohna & Khaika, Sector-4, Distt

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s GLS Infratech Pvt. Ltd.











1. The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 15.66% of the

project area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project

proponent shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015

submitted revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the

same.




treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit plan

depicting the area ear marked for composting.





16




Notification.


Housing Colony Project at Village Sihi, Sector-36-A, Distt Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s AVL Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.










Affordable Group Housing Colony Project at Village Sihi, Sector-36-A, Distt Gurgaon,

Haryana on a total plot area of 36582.512 sqm (9.03975 acres). The total built up area

shall be 99573.631 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 5 Blocks (Stilt + 10

Floors). The proposed project shall have 1480 Dwelling Units (1BHK & 2BHK),

Commercial, Community Center and Anganwadi–cum-creche. The maximum height of

the building shall be 38.85 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1071 KLD. The

fresh water requirement shall be 677 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 893

KLD, which will be treated in the two STPs of 600 KLD + 500 KLD capacity. The total

power requirement shall be 6700 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project


plantation + 10.505% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 09 rain

water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 3959 kg/day. The bio-

degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate technology.

The total parking spaces proposed are 740 ECS.









17

was noticed that the project proponent has given undertaking stating that no construction

shall be raised in the ROW reserved for HT line. It was also noticed that the project

proponent has not earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for

collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.









case may be.





[5] The project proponent shall submit plan depicting clearly the area earmarked for

composting.

Item No. [15] Environmental Clearance for Mining of minor minerals “Road Metal

& Masonry Stone” at village Mukundpura, District Mahendergarh,

Haryana by Shri Satish Kumar Garg.











1. The project proponent has not submitted NOC from the Forest Department. The

project proponent on 29.10.2015 submitted letter issued by Mines and Geology

Department indicating that the mine leased area is not a Forest land. The SEAC

should examine the same.

2. The SEAC in its recommendation has given different figures of production. The

lease period is for remaining three years whereas in the conditions the production

18

figures have been given of year wise up to 5 years and sum of production for the

next five years.

3. The mine lease has been granted for 20 years w.e.f. 20.07.1999 up to 10.07.2019.

Therefore the mine is in operation and it is not a new project.

4. The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they have kept-

amount (figures to be given) for reclamation of excavated mine lease area and

shall also ensure that all the environmental safe-guards shall be adopted for

closure of mine.




Notification.

***

1





14.9.2006.




Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Industrial Unit” (Unit-

VIII) at Plot No-37, Sec-4B, IE, HSIIDC, Dist-Jhajjar, Bahadurgarh,

Haryana by M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd.

The SEAC has examined the proposal in the light of amended Notification dated

22.12.2014 issued by MoEF&CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project proposal

from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.

Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per guidelines issued

by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. The Authority unanimously decided to agree with recommendation of

SEAC and decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining

environmental clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI

dated 09.06.2015 by the project proponent.

Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for “Institutional project” at Village-

Aurangpur, District Jhajjar, Haryana by M/s Xavier Labour Relations

Institute.







today’s meeting. The Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and decided to

grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental clearance subject

to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project

proponent

Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for “Group Housing Complex” at, Village-

Nawada Fatehpur & Naharpur Kasan in Sector-81 & 86, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s International Green Scapes Ltd.

The SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015 has recommended to de-list

this case on the basis of report of sub-committee. The sub-committee visited the site on

2

26.02.2015 reported that due to change in the concept and design the project proponent

has not started the construction work so far and recommended to de-list the case.

Finding no reason to disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the

Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also decided that the decision of the

Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy of the same be

forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O.

MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.

Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Complex at Village

Daulatabad, Sector-103, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Microtek Infratech

Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015 has recommended to de-list

this case on the basis of report of sub-committee. The sub-committee visited the site on

26.02.2015 reported that due to change in the concept and design the project proponent

has not started the construction work so far and recommended to de-list the case.

Finding no reason to disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the

Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also decided that the decision of the

Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy of the same be

forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O.

MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.

Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for w.r.t Expansion of Ware House at

Village Behrampur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s P.D.Enterprises.

The recommendation of SEAC in its 89th meeting held on 26.08.2013 to grant

environmental clearance to this project was considered by SEIAA in its 60th, 68th, 72nd,

76th and 80th meeting held on 07.11.2013, 19.03.2014, 25.06.2014, 13.10.2014 and

22.01.2015 wherein, the representative of the project proponent again failed to submit the

copy of validated CLU/approved building plan. The Authority decided to refer back this

case to SEAC with the advice to inspect the site and to verify the status of construction.

Accordingly the case was referred back to SEAC, due to lapse of term of SEIAA the case

was transferred to MoEF&CC, GoI. No action was taken by MoEF&CC, GoI and the

case was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.

The SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015 considered this project

wherein, the request for exemption as per amended notification 22.12.2014 as submitted

by the project proponent vide letter dated 09.10.2015 was discussed. The SEAC decided

that SEIAA may seek clarification from the MoEC & CC, GoI regarding requirement of

environment clearance in view of amended notification dated 22.12.2014 in this case.

The observation of SEAC to seek clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI regarding

requirement of environmental clearance in view of amended Notification dated

22.12.2014 was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the

in the similar cases of warehouse projects in the same meeting the SEAC has considered

3

the project proposal for grant of environment clearance. The Authority was of the view

that the stand alone warehouse projects are required to seek prior environmental

clearance under EIA, Notification and are not exempted. It was also found that the

MoEF&CC, GoI has also vide letter dated 20.11.2015 has clarified that the warehouse

projects are not exempted from obtaining environmental clearance in view of amended

Notification no. S.O. 3252 (E) dated 22.12.2014.

In view of the above discussions it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the advice to inspect the site and to verify the status of construction and send the

recommendations within stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification.

Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Industrial Building for

testing of vehicles (R & D Centre) at Plot No. 1, Sector-33 B-33C IMT,

Rohtak by M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.







today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with recommendation of SEAC and

decided to grant exemption to the project proposal from obtaining environmental

clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015

by the project proponent

Item No. [7] Revision in EC for Residential Colony “TDI City” located at Sec-58,

59, 60, 61, 63 & 64 Sonepat-Kundli, Haryana by M/s TDI

Infrastructure Ltd.

The case was considered by SEAC in its 119th meeting held on 20.10.2015. The

SEAC observed that the EAC of MoEF, GoI in its 150th meeting held on 29 to 31, July

2015 considered this case for finalization of TOR (F.no.21-98/2015-IA.III) and decided

to have site visit but site visit report is not available in the records. The SEAC has

requested SEIAA to obtain the site visit report from MoEF&CC, GoI in this case.

The observation of SEAC was considered on the today’s meeting. It was noticed

that the EAC of MoEF&CC, GoI deferred the proposal for finalization of TOR in its

150th meeting with the following remarks:

The EAC observed that a huge amount of traffic from the project site opens straight way

in to already congested National Highway No.1. There is no access to slip road and there

appears to be a lack of perspective traffic planning. The Committee recommended a site

visit by Dr. Anuradha Shukla, Member, Expert Appraisal Committee (Infrastructure &

CRZ) to work out the access road planning so that traffic from the proposed township

does not affect the traffic on National Highway-I.

4

The Authority decided to return the file to SEAC with the advice to obtain the site

visit report from the MoEF&CC, GoI Expert Member Dr. Anuradha Shukla at their own

level.

Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Affordable Group

Housing” (5.0 acres) at Village Dhunela, Sector-35, Sohna, District

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Tulsiani Construction and Developers Ltd.



“Affordable Group Housing” (5.0 acres) at Village Dhunela, Sector-35, Sohna, District

Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 20234 sqm (5 acres). The total built up area

shall be 47900.35 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise Residential units (850 DU),

Commercial area, Community Building, Educational Facility (1 no. of Anganwadi). The

maximum height of the building shall be 50 meter. The total water requirement shall be

640 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 403 KLD. The waste water generation

shall be 524 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 625 KLD capacity. The total















was noticed that the project proponent has given undertaking stating that no construction

shall be raised in the ROW reserved for HT line. It was also noticed that the project

proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for

collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.



the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice.

[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 20.29% of the project area.


5



case may be.





Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Food Manufacturing

Unit” at Plot No. 4, 5, 6 & 7, Sector-30A, Industrial Estate, HSIIDC,

IMT Rohtak Haryana by M/s Lotte India Corporation Ltd.







today’s meeting. The Authority accepted the recommendation of SEAC and decided to



proponent

Item No. [10]Environmental Clearance for proposed group housing project

“Ashiana Anmol” at Village Dhulena, Sector-33, Tehsil Sohna &

District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Universe Heights (India) Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of group

housing project “Ashiana Anmol” at Village Dhulena, Sector-33, Tehsil Sohna & District

Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 53975 sqm (13.33 acres). The total built up area

shall be 141090 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 13 Residential Blocks, 01

Commercial Block, 01 EWS Block and 02 Schools, Club House, shops (15 nos.) etc. The

proposed project shall have 1 Basement + maximum 14 floors, 780 MDU and 138 EWS

units. The maximum height of the building shall be 49.65 meter. The total water

requirement shall be 827 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 464 KLD. The

waste water generation shall be 623 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 650 KLD

capacity. The total power requirement shall be 6809 KW which will be supplied by

DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 39.55% of project

area (24.55% tree plantation + 15% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to

construct 12 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2511 kg/day.

The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate

technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 1404 ECS.

6






of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and

NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was noticed that the project proponent has

given undertaking stating that no construction shall be raised in the ROW reserved for

HT line. It was observed that the project proponent has not earmarked the space for solid

waste management site on the plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-

degradable waste.








case may be.






composting.


rules/norms.

Item No. [11]Environmental Clearance for proposed “Warehouse Project” at

revenue estate of Village Binola, Manesar, District Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s India Land & Space Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has referred this case to the SEIAA with the recommendation for

initiating legal action in view of the MoEF&CC, GoI OM no. J-11013/41/2006-1A.II(I)

dated 12.12.2012. The SEAC has considered the project proposal in its 120th meeting

held on 06.11.2015 and noticed that the project proponent has already completed the

construction of the “warehouse project” without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance

which amounts to violation of EIA Notification dated 14-09-2006. The project proponent

submitted the copy of resolution ensuring that violation of provisions of the Environment

(Protection) Act, 1986 will not be repeated in future and also admitted its mistake for

carrying out construction without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance.

7

In the today’s meeting the recommendation of SEAC in this case was examined. It

was noticed that the Hon’ble National Green Tribunal in OA. No. 37 of 2015 and 213 of

2014 in the matter of S.P. Muthuraman V/s Union of India & Others on 07.07.2015 has

quashed the operation of MoEF&CC, GoI OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II (1) dated 12-

12-2012 and MoEF, GoI OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated 27.06.2013. It was

noticed that MoEF & CC, GoI has not issued any fresh guidelines in view of the quashing

of OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013 by Hon’ble NGT.

In view of the above observations it was decided that:

[2] The Principal Secretary Environment may be requested to issue directions under

Section 5 of EPA Act, 1986 to the project proponent in respect of violations, as

per the requirement of MoEF, GoI, OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I) dated

27.06.2013.

[3] Giving reference of NGT orders; the SEIAA may seek clarification/advice of

MoEF&CC, GoI regarding operation of MoEF&CC, GoI OM No. J-11013/41/2006-

IA.II (1) dated 12-12-2012 and MoEF, GoI, OM No. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)

dated 27.06.2013.

Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony at village

Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling


This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of the SEIAA held on

29.10.2015 wherein, it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the project

proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15

days or before next meeting.

[1] The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also


degradable waste.

[1] The Principal Secretary Environment may be requested to initiate credible action

on the violation by invoking powers under Section 19 of the Environment

(Protection)Act,1986, for taking necessary legal action under Section 15 of the Act

for the period for which the violation has taken place, against the M/s India Land

& Space Logistics Pvt. Ltd, RZ-279 (A-55), Mahipalpur Extension, NH-8, New

Delhi for commencing construction of Warehouse Project” at revenue estate of

Village Binola, Manesar, District Gurgaon, Haryana without obtaining prior

Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification14-09-2006. The Principal

Secretary Environment may also be requested to provide the evidence of

credible action taken against the project proponent.

8

[2] The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper



[3] The project proponent shall submit the plan depicting area clearly ear marked for

composting.

In the today’s meeting the reply dated 20.11.2015 submitted by the project

proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted

details of solid waste management, earmarking space on the plan for treatment of bio-

degradable waste and undertaking stating that no construction has been raised at the site

with photograph.







case may be.


rules/norms.

Item No. [13]Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony

located in the revenue estate of Village Sohna, Sector-2 of Sohna,

District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Shree Vardhman Developers Pvt.

Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of the SEIAA held on

29.10.2015 wherein, it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the project

proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below mentioned observations within 15

days or before next meeting.

[1] The project proponent shall submit details of solid waste management and also


degradable waste.

[2] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for

composting.

[3] The project proponent shall submit revised traffic circulation plan indicating

dimension of entry and exit ramp of basement.


proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted

details of solid waste management, earmarking space on the plan for treatment of bio-

degradable waste and revised traffic circulation plan showing 4 meter wide entry and exit

ramp of basement.

9







case may be.


rules/norms.

*****

1





14.9.2006.




Item No. [1] Environmental Clearance in respect of IT Compelx at Plot No. 287-288,

Udyog Vihar, Phase- II, Gurgaon by M/s PCI Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to the project

was considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:

1. The project proponent on 26.11.2012 submitted application for seeking

environment clearance for the project. The project proposal was taken up by

SEAC in its 78th, 85th, 89th, & 106th meetings held on 26.03.2013, 24.06.2013,

27.08.2013 & 17.06.2014. The SEAC observed that the project proponent has

started the construction without obtaining prior environment clearance thus

violated the provision of EIA Notification. The project proponent also submitted

certified true copy of resolution dated 26.06.2013 admitting that the mistake for

starting construction without obtaining prior environment clearance and also

ensuring that the violation shall not be repeated in future; as per the requirement of

MoEF&CC, GoI, OM no. J-11013/41/2006-1AII(I) dated 12.12.2012. The SEAC

recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent.

2. The recommendation of SEAC was considered in the 73rd meeting held on

18.07.2014. The SEIAA decided to refer this case to Principal Secretary

Environment for initiating legal action against the project proponent as per

prescribed procedure. The SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2014/1078 dated

06.08.2014 requested Principal Secretary Environment to initiate legal action

against the project proponent under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and send

credible action taken report.

3. The project proponent filed an application in the Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High

Court “CRM-M-30394 of 2013” during hearing this case on 09.10.2015. The

SEIAA came to know that legal action has already been initiated by RO, HSPCB

prior to submission of application by the project proponent for environment

clearance but intimation to the same was not given to SEIAA.

4. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court on 09.10.2015 passed directions to

decide the application of the project proponent within 3 months. The case was

referred to SEAC for appraisal. The SEAC considered this case in its 121st

2

meeting held on 19.11.2015 and recommended this case for environmental

clearance.

5. The SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already

sought clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in

violation cases keeping in view the quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble

NGT but no response from the MOEF & CC, GOI has been received.

6. It was also observed that Hon’ble Supreme Court of India on 24.09.2015 in CA

No. 7191-7192/2015 in the matter of “M/s Dugar Housing Ltd V/s

S.P.Muthuraman & Ors has stayed the operation of impugned judgment (s) and

order (s) passed by Hon’ble NGT.

In view of the above observations it was decided to defer the case to the next

meeting with the decision that:

i. Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier

communication dated 28.12.2015 of this office, the MOEF & CC, GOI may

again be requested to send necessary clarification in the matter so as to enable

the SEIAA to take appropriate action in violation cases well within the

stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification/guidelines, in order to avoid

any litigation.

ii. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court may be apprised of the factual

position of this case. A request may also be made to extend the deadline of

three months period (09.01.2016) for further two months in view of the

explained circumstances.

Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Colony located at

Revenue Estate of Village Nuna Majra, Sector-37, Bahadurgarh,

Haryana by M/s HL Promoters Pvt Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Group

Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Nuna Majra, Sector-37,

Bahadurgarh, Haryana on a total plot area of 66494.8 sqm (16.43). The total built up area

shall be 140796.597 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 07 Blocks, Block-1 (4

Towers + GF + Stilt + 14 Floors), Block-2 (3 Tower + GF + Stilt + 14 Floors), Block-3

(2 Towers + GF + Stilt +14 Floors), Block-4 (1 Tower + Stilt + 6 Floors), Block-5 (1

Tower + GF+ Stilt + 14 Floors), Block-6 (3 Towers + GF + Stilt + 14 floors), Block-7 (2

Tower + GF + 7 Floors), Community building, Nursery Schools & Primary School etc.

The proposed project shall have 1352 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the

building shall be 51 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1000 KLD. The fresh


which will be treated in the 2 STPs of 675 KLD & 200 KLD capacity. The total power

requirement shall be 12067 KVA which will be supplied by UHBVN. The Project

3

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 30% of project area (25% tree

plantation + 5% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 16 rain water

harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 3315.3 kg/day. The bio-degradable

waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste

converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x 4M. The total parking spaces

proposed are 1653 ECS.


discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, HT Line, water requirement, quality of

water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of water,


assurance of HUDA for supply of water and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.

It was noticed that the project proponent has proposed parking in the ROW reserved for

HT line. The project proponent submitted revised parking plan showing no

parking/proposed construction in the ROW reserved for HT Line. It was observed that the

project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan

for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.







case may be.







project area.







4

Item No. [3] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Colony

located at Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh

Complex, Haryana by M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has forwarded this case with the recommendation to seek clarification

from MOEF & CC, GOI regarding applicability of EIA Notification in the existing

project of project proponent. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting and it was observed that:

1. The project proponent submitted application for expansion of Group Housing

Colony for construction of Group Housing on the additional license of 2.667 acres.

The license to the existing Group Housing Colony was granted in the year 1984

and 1995 measuring 30.35 Acres. The drawing/building plan of 30.35 acre was

sanction/approved in the year 1985.

2. The SEAC considered the exemption letter dated 13.01.2011 of RO, MOEF & CC,

GOI submitted by the project proponent mentioning that more than 45% of built

up area of the colony was completed and 9.36% of the total built up area was

above the plinth level prior to issuance of Notification dated 07.7.2004 and

therefore, the said colony neither attracts the provisions of 07.07.2004 nor EIA

Notification dated 14.09.2006 and no environmental clearance is required from

MOEF & CC, GOI/SEIAA for the existing colony. The SEAC was of the view

that only 45% of built up area was completed and 9.36% of total built up area was

above plinth level prior to Notification dated 07.07.2004. This means that

remaining built up area might have been completed after 13.01.2011 without

obtaining environment clearance.

3. The project proponent vide letter dated 06.12.2015 has requested for with-drawl

of present application. The project proponent has informed that he will submit

separate online application for additional 2.662 acres. The project proponent has

informed to develop independent group housing on 2.662 acres of land and shall

provide separate services in the unit.

4. The date of start of construction, date of completion of structure up to plinth level

and date of completion of project was not available in the records with

authenticated proof for ascertaining the applicability of EIA Notification dated

14.09.2006 in the existing project.

In view of the above observations it was decided that to defer the case to the next

meeting with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to furnish below

mentioned information within 10 days or before the next meeting of SEIAA.

[1] The project proponent shall submit the date of start of construction, date of

completion of structure up to plinth level and date of completion of project with



5

Item No. [4] Environmental Clearance for proposed expansion (Phase II) of “SRM

University” situated at Plot No. 39, Rajiv Gandhi Education City,

Sonipat, Haryana by SRM Institute of Science & Technology.










proponent.

Item No. [5] Environmental Clearance for the service/Maintenance and Training

Facility for customers from Defence Forces and DRDO labs including

inspection, calibration and maintenance services project in the

industrial estate of plot no. 916, Sector-68, IMT, Faridabad, Haryana

by M/s Tata Power Company Ltd.










proponent.

Item No. [6] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP/CETP Project at

Village Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana

by Public Health Engineering Division.

The SEAC has forwarded the case with the request to write a letter to HSPCB to

conduct comprehensive study of discharge in sewer and the drain to ascertain whether

this case is of STP or CETP. The case was considered in the today’s meeting. The

Authority observed that:

1. The project proponent on 26.02.2015 submitted application for seeking clearance

for the project under item no. 7(h) of schedule of EIA Notification dated

14.09.2006 for setting up of CETP. The project proponent has submitted

application in compliance to the Hon’ble NGT.

6

2. The project proponent claims that they intend to set up STP to treat sewage. This

activity is not covered under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and

environmental clearance is not required. However the SEAC is of the opinion that

to ascertain whether this case is of STP or CETP a comprehensive study of

discharge in sewer and drain be got connected from HSPCB.

3. The Hon’ble NGT in application no. 124 of 2013 in the matter of “Kehar Singh

V/s State of Haryana” has clearly passed directions to the applicant. The relevant

part of directions (para 48 of order dated 12.09.2013) is reproduced as under:

“We direct the respondent to seek EC from SEIAA at the earliest and in any

case not later than one month from today. We further direct SEIAA to process the

application and complete the entire exercise of granting clearance conditional or

otherwise-or refusing the same within two months thereafter. In the

circumstances of the case, we would not direct removal of the plant to the extent

to which it has already been constructed at the site as all acts done so far and

that may be done hereafter would be subject to the grant of EC to the projects in

question by the competent authority.”

The project proponents in compliance to the Hon’ble NGT order vide letter

no. 14658 dated 04.10.2013 submitted application for environmental clearance.

The SEIAA vide letter no. 1187 dated 07.11.2013 returned the application as the

same was found in-complete. Now the applicant has submitted application under

item no. 7(h) of schedule of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006.

4. The SEIAA cannot ask HSPCB to conduct study as opined by SEAC. It is

responsibility of the project proponent and their consultant to get the study

conducted.

In view of the above observations the Authority decided to refer back this case to

SEAC with the advice to appraise this project under item no. 7(h) as submitted by the

applicant and send clear cut recommendation to the SEIAA within stipulated period as

prescribed in the Notification dated 14.09.2006.

Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for Institutional Project located at Village

Bhupani, Faridabad, Haryana by Satyug Darshan Trust.









7


proponent.

Item No. [8] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Commercial Complex at

Village-Pawala Khusrupur, Sector-109, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Citra Properties Ltd. The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance subject to


Commercial Complex at Village-Pawala Khusrupur, Sector-109, Gurgaon, Haryana on a

total plot area of 23876.42 sqm (5.90 acre). The total built up area shall be 85458.21 sqm.

The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 basements + GF + maximum 20 floors. The

maximum height of the building shall be 90.9 meter. The total water requirement shall be



power requirement shall be 5850 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 5052.27 sqmt (25.47%) of project area

(1797.09 sqmt tree plantation + 702.21 sqmt avenue plantation + 2552.97 sqmt lawn

area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 06 rain water harvesting pits. The

solid waste generation will be 1465 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in

the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for

OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 1063 ECS.


discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, water requirement, quality of water, green

belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of


circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA

for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for

supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon


clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid


degradable waste. It was found that the project proponent has obtained structural stability

certificate issued by BMSF Design Consultants Pvt. Ltd dully signed by certified

registered structural engineer.

After detailed deliberations, the Authority decided to agree with the



[1] Vertical fenestration shall not exceed 25.47% of total wall area.

[2] The project proponent shall provide green area on terrace and roof top.

8












project area.







Item No. [9] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing Colony

located at Village Atmadpur, Sector-31, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Ozone

GSP Infratech.



Housing Colony located at Village Atmadpur, Sector-31, Faridabad, Haryana on a total

plot area of 7057.71 sqm (1.744 acre). The total built up area shall be 20734.9 sqm. The

Group Housing project shall have 3 towers with 2 basements + GF + maximum 15

Floors, EWS units, Servant units, Convenient shopping/Commercial and community

center. The Group Housing project shall have 816 Dwelling Units. The maximum height

of the building shall be 49.90 meter. The total water requirement shall be 81 KLD. The

fresh water requirement shall be 47 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 58 KLD,


be 1014.43 KW which will be supplied by HVPNL. The Project Proponent has proposed

to develop green belt on 2052.91 sqmt (29.08%) of project area (485.48 sqmt tree

plantation + 321.35 sqmt avenue plantation + 62.73 sqmt shrubs plantation + 33.50 sqmt

hedge/ground cover + 1149.85 sqmt lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to


The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC

(organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking

spaces proposed are 212 ECS.

9




involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc.

The representative of the project proponent submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA

for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC of

airport Authority regarding height clearance and NOC from DFO regarding Non

involvement of Forest land. It was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked

the space for solid waste management site on the plan for collection, segregation and









case may be.

Item No. [10] Environmental Clearance for Construction for an Affordable Group

Housing located at Village Badha, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing located at Village Badha, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana on a

total plot area of 21397.72 sqm (5.2875 acres). The total built up area shall be 50004.508

sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 10 Towers, Tower 1 to 7 (Basement + Stilt +

GF + 13 Floors in each tower), Tower 8 to 10 (Basement + Stilt +GF + 3 Floors in each

tower), Commercial Building, Aganwadi etc. The maximum height of the building shall

be 45 meter. The total water requirement shall be 660 KLD. The fresh water requirement


the STP of 670 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3800.14 KVA which


on 4714.684 sqmt (22.03%) of project area (3152.146 sqmt tree plantation + 1562.538

sqmt landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 06 rain water harvesting

pits. The solid waste generation will be 2388 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be

treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area

required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 485 ECS.



10







was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste


waste.








case may be.


(2.5625 acre) located in the Revenue Estate of Village Gurgaon, Sector-

3, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Santur Realtor Pvt. Ltd.

The SEIAA in its 83rd meeting held on 28.09.2015 decided to refer back this case

to the SEAC for re-appraisal. The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015

considered the reply dated 23.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the

observations as raised by SEIAA as under:-

(i) The SEAC should examine the revise traffic circulation plan submitted by project

proponent vide letter dated 09.03.2015.

(ii) The project proponent shall obtain clarification from the competent authority of

electricity department and shall submit the same to SEAC.

(iii)The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking




(iv) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non



The SEAC has again recommended this case for environmental clearance. The

recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The

reply submitted by project proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.

11

After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the







case may be.

Item No. [12] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Complex namely “Ansal

Heights” at Sector-92, Village- Wazirpur, Tehsil & Distt. Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/S Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd.





(i) The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of


(ii) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking




(iii) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non













case may be.

[4] The project proponent shall submit NOC from Chief Wild Life Warden stating

that the project area does not fall in the area notified as eco-sensitive zone around

Sultanpur National Park Gurgaon before the start of construction.

12



project area.







Item No. [13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Hotel Project at Sector-60,

Gurgaon by M/s Toucan Real Estates Pvt. Ltd.





(i) The project proponent has not obtained the assurance for water supply from

competent authority. The project proponent shall obtain the same and submit to

the SEAC.

(ii) The project proponent shall submit proof of having deposited up to date

EDC/IDC paid to the concerned department to the SEAC.

(iii) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non

applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra

number indicated the license.

(iv) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking

calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the

project proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted

for treatment of bio-degradable waste.









[3] The project proponent shall meet the emission standards for Hotel Industry

prescribed by CPCB under schedule-I of rule 3 of Environment (Protection)

Rules, 1986.

13

Item No. [14] Environmental Clearance for Affordable group hosing colony (10

acres) in the revenue estate of village Hayatpur, Sector -90, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Aster Infrahome Pvt. Ltd.





(i) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non

applicability of Aravalli Notification issued by DC conform that of Khasra

number indicated the license


calculation is as per latest prescribed norms and shall also ensure that the

project proponent has furnished details of appropriate technology to be adopted

for collection of solid waste and treatment of bio-degradable waste.

(iii) The project proponent shall ensure the applicability of standards and codes for

fire and safety.










Housing Colony project at Village Kherki Majra Dhankot, Sector-99,

Distt Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 118th meeting held on 04.03.2015 recommended this project for

environmental clearance. In compliance to the Hon’ble NGT order the MoEF&CC, GoI

perused the recommendations of SEAC and raised certain observations. The MoEF&CC,

GoI vide letter dated 14.09.2015 requested to re-appraise the project in term of the

deficiencies as stated in the letter as per the requirement contained in the EIA

Notification 2006. The case was referred to the SEAC to re-appraise the case in terms of

deficiencies as under:-

(i) Out of the total water requirement of 713 kld, 455 kld would be fresh water and

258 kld recycled treated water. The fresh water requirement is to be met through

HUDA municipal supply. However there in no firm commitment of HUDA in

this regard. A letter of commitment be obtained from HUDA.

14

(ii) The project site falls in un-sewered area. The project proponent and SEAC have

mentioned about an arrangement of zero discharge, but how the same will be

achieved in rainy season, has not been clarified.

(iii) One of the specific conditions in recommendations of SEAC, the project

proponent to comply is read as under:-

“Fly ash should be used for building material in the construction as per the

provisions of Fly Ash Notification of September, 1999 and as amended on 22nd

August, 2003”

There is no implementation mechanism proposed by the project proponent in this

regard.

(iv) The project proponent has other projects under implementation in the State, as is

evident from the SEAC minutes of the meeting held on 16th April, 2014.

Compliance status of EC conditions in those projects be filed for further action.

The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015 considered the reply dated

21.10.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and again

recommended this case for environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC along with reply dated 21.10.2015 submitted by

the project proponent was considered in the today’s meeting. It was found that the project

proponent has submitted proof of submission of 6 monthly compliance report but failed

to submit the certified copies of compliance of in respect of (i) Affordable Group

Housing, Sector-84, Gurgaon. (ii) DD Township Group Housing Sector-70 Faridabad.

(iii) Apex Build Well; Group Housing Project, Sector-37C Gurgaon. The project

proponent is required to submit certified copy of compliance report from RO,

MoEF&CC, GoI Chandigarh in respect of the above three projects.








case may be.

[4] The project proponent shall submit certified copy of compliance report from RO,

MoEF&CC, GoI, Chandigarh in respect of (i) Affordable Group Housing, Sector-

84, Gurgaon. (ii) DD Township Group Housing Sector-70 Faridabad. (iii)Apex

Build Well; Group Housing Project, Sector-37C Gurgaon within three months

15

period falling which the EC granted shall stand withdrawn without further

intimation.





Item No. [16] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Gateway Tower, IT

Park” Project measuring 8.50 acres at Sector-37, Village- Anangpur,

Faridabad, Haryana being developed by M/s Dove Infrastructure Pvt.

Ltd.

The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 recommended this case for

environmental clearance. The SEAC in its recommendations has stated that before

granting EC clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI the obtained as to whether the OM dated

12.12.2012 is applicable or not in view of the stay granted by Hon’ble Supreme Court of

India. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting and the Authority observed that:

1. The project proponent on 30.04.2014 submitted application for environment

clearance for the project as indicated in the subject. On the recommendation of

SEAC the SEIAA vide letter dated 06.08.2014 requested Principal Secretary

Environment to initiate legal action against the project proponent under EPA 1986

as the project proponent had started the construction without obtaining prior

environmental clearance. A request was also made to send credible action taken

report. The Principal Secretary environment vide letter dated 11.03.2015 provided

the evidence of credible action taken against the project proponent.

2. Due to the lapse term of SEIAA/SEAC the case could not be appraised and

transferred to MoEF&CC, GoI. No action taken by MoEF&CC, GoI and the case

was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.

3. The SEIAA vide letter SEIAA/HR/2015/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already

requested Joint Secretary MoEF&CC, GoI to provide necessary clarification in the

matter so as to enable the SEIAA to take appropriate action in violation cases.

In view of the above observations it was decided to defer the case to the next

meeting with the decision that:

(i) Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier





any litigation.

16

Item No. [17] Environmental Clearance for “Expansion of Commercial Complex” at

Sector-65, Badshahpur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Prajakta Colonizers

Pvt. Ltd.



“Expansion of Commercial Complex” at Sector-65, Badshahpur, Gurgaon, Haryana with

the proposal as given under.

Particulars Existing Area

(EC Granted)

Expansion Area

(EC Required)

Total Area

Plot area 22864.83 sqm

(5.656 acre)

No change 22864.83 sqm

(5.656 acre)

Ground coverage achieved 6110.68 sqmt 250.57 sqmt 6361.295 sqmt

FAR achieved 32144.745 sqm 122.2 sqmt 32267.001 sqmt

Total Built up Area 60168.659 sqmt 271.396 sqmt 60440.055 sqmt

Total no. of Floors G+5 1 Floor G+6

Number of Blocks 3 -1 2

Height 26 meter 4 meter 30 meter

Green Area (27%) 4888.96 sqmt No change 4888.96 sqmt

Parking 646 ECS

Total Water Requirement 334 KLD -20 KLD 314 KLD

Fresh Water 231 KLD -78 KLD 153 KLD

Waste Water 114 KLD 55 KLD 169 KLD

STP 140 KLD 60 KLD 200 KLD

Power (DHBVN) 3059 KW 563.52 KW 3622.52 KW

RWH 3 pits 2 pits 5 pits

Solid waste 734 kg/day 41 kg/day 775 kg/day





and status of compliance of conditions imposed in the EC letter. It was also noticed that

the project proponent has proposed to dispose of Bio-degradable waste to MSW site. The project

proponent is required to submit assurance for the same. It was also noticed that the license

granted by Town and Country Planning Department has lapsed on 07.11.2015 and the project

proponent is required to submit copy of validated license.



the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice. It was also decided

that the EC shall be issued only after the submission of copy of validated license and

assurance of competent Authority for disposal of MSW at the designated site.






17


[5] The project proponent shall submit copy of validated license and assurance of

competent Authority for disposal of MSW at the designated site.


Housing at Sector-99A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Prime Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd.



“Affordable Group Housing” at Sector-99A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,

Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 24104 sqm. The total built up area shall be

52104.76 sqm. The proposed Project shall have 03 Blocks, Stilt + maximum 12 floors.

The proposed project shall have 816 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the




be 4500 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to

develop green belt on 9222.14 sqmt of project area (5981.93 sqmt tree plantation +

3240.210 sqmt landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water

harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2.16 Ton/day. The bio-degradable


converter). The area required for OWC will be 100 sqm. The total parking spaces












waste.




[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 9222.14 sqmt of the project

area.


18



case may be.

Item No. [19] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project

(10 acres) allot ed by HUDA, Faridabad at Rojka Meo Industrial

Estate, District Mewat, Haryana by M/s MMTC PAMP India Pvt. Ltd.



Housing Project (10 acres) allotted by HUDA, Faridabad at Rojka Meo Industrial Estate,

District Mewat, Haryana on a total plot area of 40480 sqm. The total built up area shall

be 28920 sqm. The proposed Project shall have 14 Blocks, GF + Maximum 08 Floors,

157 DU. The maximum height of the building shall be 29 meter. The total water




DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 39% of project

area (20% tree plantation + 19% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to

construct 10 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 0.56 Ton/day.

The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of Bio-

Mechanical Composting. The area required for Bio-Mechanical Composting will be 3M x

4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 5723.298 sqmt.



development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,

recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the

project proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water and NOC from

Forest Department regarding non involvement of Forest land. It was observed that the

project proponent has not earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the

plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste.



the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice..




case may be.


rules/norms.

19

Item No. [20] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing

Colony Project at Village Dhorka, Sector-95, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Ramsons Organics Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Colony Project at Village Dhorka, Sector-95, District-

Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 19600.96641 sqm (4.8435 acres). The total built

up area shall be 45975.331 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 7 Block (A-G)

Residential and Commercial building. The maximum height of the building shall be





on 21.5% of project area (15% plantation + 6.5% landscaping). The Project Proponent


2137.49 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting

appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 504 ECS.











waste but the detail of technology for treatment of bio-degradable waste are not discussed

and dimensions of the reserved area not given.



the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice. The EC shall be

submitted subject to the submission of details of technology to be adopted for treatment

of bio-degradable waste in the project area along with the dimensions of area earmarked

for management of solid waste within 15 days.



20



case may be.

[4] The project proponent shall submit detail of technology for treatment of bio-

degradable waste and dimensions of the area reserved for management of solid

waste.

Item No. [21] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing

Colony project at Village Naurangpur, Sector-79, 79B, Distt Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Revital Reality Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Colony Project at Village Naurangpur, Sector-79, 79B, Distt.

Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 48967.01 sqm (12.10 acres). The total built up

area shall be 146757.47 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise 15 Towers +

Basement + GF + maximum 17 Floors, Commercial (Mumty +Water tank),

Anganwadi/Community. The maximum height of the building shall be 55.285 meter. The

total water requirement shall be 1424 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 903

KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1237 KLD, which will be treated in the 2 STPs

of 1180 KLD & 307 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 7015 KW

which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop

green belt on 10277.354 sqm (20.99%) of project area (7345.05 sqm plantation + 2932.3

sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 12 rain water harvesting

pits. The solid waste generation will be 5331.977 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will

be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area

required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 1093 ECS.


discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, water requirement, quality of water, green




for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for

supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon


clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid


degradable waste.




21





case may be.



project area.







Item No. [22] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project at

Sector-2, Tehsil-Sohna & District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ashiana

Dwellings Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly M/s PSL Infratech Pvt. Ltd)



Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Nuna Majra, Sector-37,

Bahadurgarh, Haryana on a total plot area of 41480.27 sqm (10.25 acre). The net planned

area is 35279.28 sqm (8.717 acre). The total built up area shall be 118863 sqm. The

proposed Project shall have 10 Residential Towers, 01 EWS Tower, 01 Commercial

Block, Community Building and Educational Building. The project will have 660 MDU,

117 EWS and 70 Servant units. The maximum number of floors shall be Basement + GF

+ 18 Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 65 meter. The total water





area (20.28% tree plantation + 10.01% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to

construct 10 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2261.37

kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of

OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 100 sqm. The total




development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic


22

for supply of water and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was observed that

the project proponent has earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the

plan for collection, segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste. It was found that

the project proponent has obtained structural stability certificate issued by TPC Technical

Projects Consultants (P) Ltd. dully signed by registered structural engineer.







case may be.

Item No. [23] Application for extension of validity period of Environment Clearance

for Group Housing and Colony for construction of group housing

colony project at Sector-5 Dharuhera Dist. Rewari, Haryana by M/s

Elite Homes Pvt. Ltd.

The application of project proponent seeking extension of validity of

environmental clearance letter along with representation submitted by the project

proponent was considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority observed that:

1. The MoEF&CC, GoI on 08.01.2008 granted environmental clearance to the

project proponent. The project proponent has submitted application for extension

of validity on 29.12.2014/25.02.2015. No action was taken due to lapse of term of

SEIAA. The case was transferred to MoEF&CC, GoI no action was taken and the

same was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.

2. The MoEF&CC, GoI vide letter dated 05.10.2015 has advised the project

proponent to seek fresh Environmental Clearance as the case is time bar.

3. The project proponent on 24.11.2015 and 08.12.2015 submitted representation to

considered grant extension of validity of EC keeping in view the amendment to

the Principal Notification dated 29.04.2015, wherein the validity of EC had been

extended from 5 to 7 year and also clarified that the MoEF&CC, GoI while issuing

the letter dated 05.10.2015 has not taken in to consideration the amended

notification extending validity period from 5 years to 7 years.

4. This office of SEIAA vide letter dated 18.12.2015 forwarded the representation of

project proponent and sought clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI whether project

proposal qualifies for consideration in view of amendment to the notification or

not. Again on 31.12.2015 a reminder was issued but clarification from

MoEF&CC, GoI is still awaited.

23

5. In the similar case, Regional office Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate

Change, Chandigarh vide letter no. F.No. 4-625/2009-RO(NZ) dated 17.07.2015

has extended the validity of environment clearance granted to M/s Energetic

Construction Pvt. Ltd. by SEIAA, Haryana vide letter no. DEH/08/SEAC-15/6-8

dated 23.01.2009 from 5 years to 7 years i.e. up to 22.01.2016.

6. The environmental clearance to the project proponent was granted by MoEF&CC,

GoI vide F.No. 21-409/2007-IA.III dated 08.01.2008. The validity of EC as per

amended notification dated 29.04.2015 was up to 07.01.2015. The project

proponent on 25.02.2015 submitted the complete application for extension of

validity of EC. The project proponent has completed about 60% of the

construction.

7. The Director of the company also submitted an undertaking on 24.11.2015 that no

construction after the expiry of the validity of EC has been raised.

In view of the above observations the Authority decided to grant extension of

validity of environmental clearance for further 7 years with effect from 07.01.2015

subject to compliance of the conditions imposed in the environmental clearance letter

issued by MoEF&CC, GoI dated 08.01.2008.

********

1





14.9.2006.




Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance in respect of IT Compelx at Plot No. 287-288,

Udyog Vihar, Phase- II, Gurgaon by M/s PCI Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to grant Environmental Clearance to this project

was taken up for consideration in the last meeting of SEIAA held on 12.01.2016 and the

case was deferred to the next meeting with the decision that:

i. Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier





any litigation.

ii. The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court may be apprised of the factual

position of this case. A request may also be made to extend the deadline of

three months period (09.01.2016) for further two months in view of the

explained circumstances.

In the today’s meeting the case was examined in the light of Hon’ble Supreme

court orders dated 22.01.2016, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has modified its

orders (regarding stay on operation of Hon’ble NGT orders) passed in CA No. 7191-

7192/2015 in the matter of “M/s Dugar Housing Ltd V/s S.P.Muthuraman & Ors.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided that Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana

High Court may be apprised of the factual position of this case and a request may also be

made to extend the deadline of three months period (09.01.2016) till final orders are

passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case.

Item No. [2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Colony

located at Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh

Complex, Haryana by M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendations of SEAC, to seek clarification from MoEF & CC, GoI

regarding applicability of EIA Notification 14.09.2006, in the existing case was taken up

for consideration in the last meeting of SEIAA held on 12.01.2016 and the case was

deferred to the next meeting with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to

furnish below mentioned information

2

[1] The project proponent shall submit the date of start of construction, date of

completion of structure up to plinth level and date of completion of project with



In the today’s meeting the letter dated 21.01.2016 giving details as submitted by

the project proponent was taken up for discussions. The perusal of the record submitted

by the project proponent revealed that the project proponent had completed the

construction of the existing Group Housing during year 1984 to 2005. The construction

up to plinth level had been completed prior to 07.07.2004 Notification. The Authority

was of the unanimous view that the provisions of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 are

not attracted to the instant Group Housing project.

In view of the above discussions the Authority accepted the request of project

proponent for withdrawal of their application submitted for expansion of Group Housing

project. The Authority also granted permission to the project proponent to submit fresh

online application for development of independent Group Housing project on 2.662 acre

of additional licensed area.

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Gateway Tower, IT Park”

Project measuring 8.50 acres at Sector-37, Village- Anangpur,

Faridabad, Haryana being developed by M/s Dove Infrastructure Pvt.

Ltd.

The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 recommended this case for

environmental clearance. The SEAC in its recommendations has stated that before

granting EC clarification from MoEF&CC, GoI the obtained as to whether the OM dated

12.12.2012 is applicable or not in view of the stay granted by Hon’ble Supreme Court of

India. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up in the last meeting of SEIAA held on

12.01.2016 and it was decided to defer the case to the next meeting with the decision that:

(i) Giving reference of Hon’ble Supreme Court orders and the earlier communication

dated 28.12.2015 of this office, the MOEF & CC, GOI may again be requested to

send necessary clarification in the matter so as to enable the SEIAA to take

appropriate action in violation cases well within the stipulated period as prescribed

in the Notification/guidelines, in order to avoid any litigation.

In the today’s meeting the case was examined in the light of Hon’ble Supreme

court orders dated 22.01.2016, wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court has modified its

orders (regarding stay on operation of Hon’ble NGT orders) passed in CA No. 7191-

7192/2015 in the matter of “M/s Dugar Housing Ltd V/s S.P.Muthuraman & Ors. The

Authority was also informed that clarification sought by SEIAA from MoEF &CC, GoI is

still awaited. The Authority decided to keep this case in abeyance till clarification is

received from MoEF & CC, GoI.

3

Item No. [4] Revised EC Proposed Group Housing Project “The Ultima” (22.231

acres) at Sector-81, Village-Lakhnola, Gurgaon by M/s DLF Homes

Developers Ltd.

1. The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to this project

was taken up for consideration in the 83rd meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015

and the case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following

observations.

(i) The project proponent shall obtain permission of competent authority for use of






(iii)The height of building is 96.85 meter which is more than 60 meter and clearance

from the recognized institution like ITTES/PEC, Regional Engineering




2. The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 22.12.2015 considered the reply dated

16.11.2015 submitted by the project proponent on the above observations and

again recommended this case for environmental clearance.


consideration. It was noticed that a committee constituted by SEIAA to monitor the

compliance of conditions inspected the site and found that adequate measures for

treatment of waste water/sewage generated from the labour camp has not been provided

by the project proponent. The HSPCB has also issued show cause notice to the project

proponent under section 33A of the water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1974,

under Section 31A of Air ((Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act 1981. It was observed

by the Authority that a condition in the EC letter has been imposed for providing mobile

toilets for labour. The project proponent has informed that the sewage generated at labour

camp of the project site is being managed by treatment in the operational STP of their

Group Housing project, New Town Heights, Sector-86, Gurgaon. It was also observed

that the project proponent vide letter dated 21.01.2016 has assured to install Sewage

Treatment Plant (STP) in the labour camp area for which necessary work order has been

placed. The project proponent has requested for withdrawal of notice.

In view of the above the Authority decided that the environmental clearance to the

project proponent shall be issued only after the confirmation regarding installation of STP

in the labour camp area is received from the project proponent as per assurance given

vide letter 21.01.2016.

4


Housing located at Sector-70A, Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Pyramid

Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 84th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.10.2015


observations.

(i) The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 18% of the project

area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project proponent

shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015 submitted

revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the same.






(iii) The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper



(iv) The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.

The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 22.12.2015 considered the reply dated


recommended this case for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was

taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the project

proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-

degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the




the following condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the

submission of capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,

dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-

degradable waste within 15 days. .




equivalent to 50% of total capacity or as per the initial occupancy as the case may

be.

5

[4] The project proponent shall submit capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of

bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved

for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.

Item No. [6] EC for the Expansion and Modernization of DLF Commercial Project

Corporate Green (IT Office, Retail and Studio/Service Apartment) at

Sector-74A, Gurgaon by M/s DLF Universal Ltd.

The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 22.12.2015 has recommended this project

for environment clearance. The project proponent submitted application on 21.10.2014

for seeking environment clearance for the expansion and Modernization of commercial

project at 74 A, Gurgaon. The environmental clearance was granted by SEIAA vide letter

no. DEH/09/SEIAA/23 dated 01.05.2009.

1. The project proponent has proposed the expansion and Modernization of unit as

under:

Details EC Granted Change Proposed

Plot Area 104050.75 sqm

25.7115 Acres

+39076.217 sqm

+ 9.656 Acres

143126.967 sqm

35.3675 Acres

FAR permissible

1.75%

182088.81 sqm +68383.382 sqm 250472.192 sqm

FAR Proposed 181878.07 sqm +63006.187 sqm 244884.258 sqm

Built up area 321300.67 sqm +76742.825 sqm 398043.495 sqm

Service

Apartments

0 +400 nos. 400

Studio Apartments 0 +292 292

Offices 926 nos. +529 nos. 1455 nos.

Shops 48 nos. +58 nos. 106 nos.

Building Height 79.6 meter +13.1 meter 92.7 meter

Total Water

Requirement

1589 KLD +557 KLD 2146 KLD

2. The MoEF &CC, GoI, Chandigarh has issued certified copy of compliance report.


consideration. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted certified copy of

compliance report issued by MoEF & CC, GoI as per the requirement of procedure

prescribed by MoEF & CC, GoI. The Authority decided that a Sub-Committee

comprising of Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall monitor

the compliance of the conditions imposed in the EC letter and shall submit the report to

the SEIAA. Accordingly the case was deferred.

Item No. [7] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group

Housing Colony” at Village Dhunela, Sector-33, Sohna, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Breez Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.


for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in. The

Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Affordable Group Housing Colony”

at Village Dhunela, Sector-33, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of

6

39755.243 sqm. The total built up area shall be 109700.216 sqm. The proposed Project

shall comprise 03 Blocks, 20 Towers, Block-1 Tower 1 to 17 (S + 10 Floors (72589.218

sqm)), Block-2 Tower 18 & 19 (S + 10 Floors (12934 sqm)), Block-3 Tower 20 (S+2

Floors (212.193 sqm)), Commercial (G+1). The maximum height of the building shall be





on 8298.383 sqm (20.874%) of project area (12.09% tree plantation + 8.784%



in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking



discussions were held regarding existence of revenuer rasta, gas pipe line, water

requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC

regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse

of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent

submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC

paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage

system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and


obtained NOC from GAIL regarding ROW reserved for Gas pipe line passing through the

project area. It was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the

capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the

earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.






degradable waste within 15 days.





be.

7



project area.







[6] The project proponent shall not raise any construction activity in the ROW reserved

for gas pipeline.





Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Baselwa,

Sector-87, District Faridabad, Haryana by M/s SRS Retreat Services

Ltd.


for environmental clearance subject to compliance of conditions stated their in.

The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group

Housing Colony located at Revenue Estate of Village Baselwa, Sector-87, District

Faridabad, Haryana on a total plot area of 20262.335 sqm (5.00694 acre). The total built

up area shall be 48964.137 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 8 Towers, Tower

A1 to Tower A5 and Tower B1 to B2 consisting of Stilt + 14 Floors, Tower C consisting

of Stilt + 4 Floors, Community Hall, Aganwadi etc. The Group Housing project shall

have 818 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be 43.53 meter. The

total water requirement shall be 603 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 405

KLD. The waste water generation shall be 498 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of

600 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3500 KVA which will be

supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on

20.95% of project area (15% tree plantation + 5.95% landscaping). The Project

Proponent proposed to construct 5 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation

will be 2247 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by

installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 450

ECS.





8



and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was noticed that the

project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation

of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for

the treatment of bio-degradable waste.











be.




Item No. [9] Revision and Expansion of Group Housing Project located at Plot No.

GH-02, Village Sarai Khawaja, Sec-41, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s

Rise Projects Pvt. Ltd.



Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Expansion of Group Housing Project

located at Plot No. GH-02, Village Sarai Khawaja, Sec-41, Faridabad, Haryana with the

proposal as given under.

Particulars Existing as per EC Total after Revision and

Expansion

Plot area 10670.88 sqm (2.64 acres)

Proposed Ground coverage 2035.712 sqm 2752.85 sqm

Proposed F.A.R 18659.011 18609.03

Total Built up Area 29961.691 sqm 33139.86 sqm

Basement Ares (Non-FAR)

Upper Basement

Lower Basement

11302.68 sqm

4085.289 sqm

7217.391 sqm

12530.71 sqm

5746.04 sqm

6784.67 sqm

Green Area (33%) 3201.264 sqm 3557.681 sqm

Parking 274 ECS 254 ECS

Total Water Requirement 164 KLD 187 KLD

Fresh Water 106 KLD 122 KLD

Waste Water 121 KLD 141 KLD

STP 150 KLD 170 KLD

Power (DHBVN) 2050 KVA

9

RWH 4 pits 3 pits

Solid Waste 566 kg/day 571 kg/day




involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan and traffic

circulation plan. It was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the

capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the

earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.







[1] The project proponent shall provide green area on 33% of project area.




Extension of EC Cases:

Item No.[10] Extension of Environmental Clearance for the project “Paliwal City”

Township at Sector-38 & 39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s Parsvnath

Developers Ltd.

The SEAC in its 124th meeting held on 23.11.2015 has forwarded this case to

SEIAA for taking decision. It was noticed that the environmental clearance to the project

proponent was accorded by SEIAA on 04.05.2009. The validity of environmental

clearance was up to 03.05.2014(5 years). The project proponent on 28.03.2014 submitted

the application for extension of validity of environmental clearance. It was noticed that

the project proponent has claimed that 60% of construction has been achieved. The

project proponent has submitted copy of valid license and also submitted copy of

certified compliance report issued by MoEF & CC, GoI NZR, Chandigarh. The Sub-

Committee also reported that the project proponent could not complete the construction

after obtaining environment clearance. The case was examined in the light of amended

notification dated 15.04.2015.

Keeping In view the above, the Authority decided to grant extension for validity of

EC for 2 years subject to compliance of the conditions already imposed in the

environmental clearance letter.

10

Item No. [11]Extension of Validity of Environment Clearance for proposed Group

Housing Project “Tulip Ace & Petals” Sector-89, Gurgaon by M/s

Tulip Infratech pvt. Ltd.



proponent was granted by MoEF & CC, GoI on 11.07.2008. The validity of the EC was

up to 10.07.2013. The project proponent on 09.07.2013 submitted application seeking

extension of validity of EC. The SEIAA on 03.02.2014 referred to the case to SEAC to

inspect the site in order to access the status of construction. The Sub-Committee on

10.03.2015 visited the site and reported that the construction of project was completed

before 16.10.2013, Consent to establish the project was obtained on 15.01.2011 and

Consent to Operate was obtained on 16.10.2013 from the appropriate Authority.

Therefore, project proponent does not require extension of validity of environment

clearance.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to write to HSPCB as to

how the Consent to Operate was issued on 16.10.2013 without valid environment

clearance letter.

Item No.[12]Extension of Environmental Clearance for Commercial Complex

measuring 4.843 Acres at Sector-66, District Gurgaon by M/s Gentle

Realtors Pvt. Ltd.




clearance was up to 31.04.2014 (5 years). The project proponent on 23.04.2014 submitted


the project proponent has claimed that only construction of basement has been done. The

project proponent has submitted copy of valid license and also submitted copy of

certified compliance report issued by MoEF & CC, GoI NZR, Chandigarh. The Sub-

Committee also reported that the project proponent has completed the excavation for

foundations and basement. The project proponent also requested for extension of validity

for their project for 7 years. The case was examined in the light of amended notification

dated 15.04.2015.




Item No.[13]Application for Extension of EC for Group Housing Project “NCR

One” on an area measuring 10.712 Acres at Sector-95, Village

Wazirpur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pashupati Buildwell Pvt. Ltd

(formally known as Pashupati Buildhome Pvt. Ltd.)



11


clearance was up to 27.10.2014 (5 years). The project proponent on 21.10.2014 submitted


the project proponent has claimed that out of total built up area of 83456.97 sqm the

80500 sqm of area has been constructed. The project proponent has submitted copy of

valid license and also submitted copy of certified compliance report issued by MoEF &

CC, GoI NZR, Chandigarh. The Sub-Committee also reported that the project proponent

has obtained occupation certificate on 25.11.2014 for 6 nos. of Towers out of proposed

10 nos. of Towers. The case was examined in the light of amended notification dated

15.04.2015.




The Authority also decided to issue show-cause notices to the project proponents

where violation of the conditions of the environment clearances has been reported by the

committee constituted by SEIAA.

****

1


held on. 29.02.2016 and 01.03.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan

IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA

Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA

Notification dated 14.9.2006.




On 29.02.2016:

Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for proposed Amarpur Jorasi Stone “along

with associated minor mineral” mining project, Distrct-Mahendergarh,

Haryana by M/s Muneer Enterprises.

The project proposal was taken up for appraisal by SEAC in its 125th meeting held

on 12.01.2016. The project proponent vide letter dated 09.01.2016 informed that

environmental clearance to their project has already been granted by MoEF & CC, GoI

vide letter dated 14.07.2014. Accordingly the SEAC recommended to file the case.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting. The Authority agree with the recommendation of SEAC decided to file this

case.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT/Cyber Park located at

Industrial Sector 19, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Dominant Offset Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 83rd meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015


observations.

1. The project proponent shall obtain copy of revalidated license and shall submit the

same to SEAC.











taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the project

proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-

degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the


2






degradable waste within 15 days. .





be.

[4] The project proponent shall maintain a collection center for E-waste and it shall be

disposed of to only registered and authorized dismantler as per existing E-waste

Management Rules 2011.




Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of proposed Group Housing

Colony located at Sector-4A, Bahadurgarh, District- Jhajjar, Haryana

by M/s Omaxe Ltd.



Housing Colony located at Sector-4A, Bahadurgarh, District- Jhajjar, Haryana on a total

plot area of 50735.8 sqm (12.537 Acres). The total built up area shall be 111811.6 sqm.

The proposed Project shall comprise of Stilt + 10 floors, 872 Apartments, 154 EWS units,

88 Servant Unit, Commercial, Community Building and Nursery School. The maximum




requirement shall be 6250 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 30% of project area (25.6% tree



degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic

waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x 4M. The total parking spaces



discussions were held regarding existence of revenue rasta, HT line, water requirement,

quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of

3

water, parking plan, traffic circulation, NOC from forest etc. It was found that the project

proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water and NOC from AAI

regarding height clearance. It was noticed that the details of calculation of Solid Waste

Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste not discussed and the space

allocated in the project for management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.




submission of details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment

of bio-degradable waste not discussed and the space allocated in the project for

management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan within 15 days. .




case may be.



project area.











[6] The project proponent shall submit of details of calculation of Solid Waste

Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste not discussed and

the space allocated in the project for management of solid waste not earmarked

on the plan within 15 days.

Item No.[4] Application for revision and extension of validity of EC of Group

Housing Colony “KLJ Heights” at Vill Kassar, Sector-15,

Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s KLJ Developers Pvt. Ltd.

This case relates to the grant of extension for validity of environmental clearance

letter. The environmental clearance to this project was granted by MoEF & CC, GoI on

19.03.2008. The validity of the EC was up to 18.03.2013. The project proponent on

4

10.09.2014 submitted application for seeking extension of validity and expansion of

project i.e. approximately after 18 months of the expiry of validity of EC.

In the today’s meeting it was found that the SEAC in its meeting held on

11.11.2014 observed that the certified copy of monitoring report dated 30.01.2014

received from MoEF & CC, GoI shows that the construction work is still in progress

whereas the validity of EC was up to 18.03.2013 and any work executed after words

tantamount to violation of EIA Notification. The SEAC also constituted sub-committee to

access the actual status of development. The sub-committee constituted by SEAC visited

the site on 05.01.2016 and reported that construction activity has been done after expiry

of EC.

In view of the above discussions the Authority was of the view that the applicant

has submitted application after the expiry of validity of EC thus this case is time bar case

and no action at this stage can be taken. The Authority decided that the project proponent

may be informed that their application for extension of validity of EC cannot be

considered as it is time bar case and the project proponent is required to submit fresh

application for environmental clearance.

Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Complex project at

Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar

MGF Land Ltd.



Commercial Complex project at Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana on a

plot area of 9105.4 sqm (2.25 Acres). The total built up area shall be 36439.033 sqm. The

proposed project shall comprise of 4 Basement + GF + 12 floors. The maximum height of

the building shall be 55.68 meters. The total water requirement shall be 227 KLD. The


KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 125 KLD capacity.

In the today’s meeting the detail it was observed by the Authority that:

1. The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of

bio-degradable waste not discussed. The space allocated in the project for

management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan.

2. The project proponent has proposed to develop 23.09% of project area under green

belt. The calculations and the plan submitted by the project proponent was not

found in order.

3. The parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project proponent

was not found in order. The project proponent is required to give details of parking

calculations and also indicate the dimensions of internal roads and ramp for entry

and exit from the basements on the plan.

5




Notification.

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for proposed Ware House for storage of non-

agricultural produce (logistics) in the revenue estate of village Bilaspur

and Pathreri, Distt Gurgaon by M/s Siyat Property Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Ware House for storage of

non-agricultural produce (logistics) in the revenue estate of village Bilaspur and Pathreri,

Distt Gurgaon on a total plot area of 52881.67 sqmt (13.67 Acres). The total built up area

shall be 27259.91 sqmt. The Ware House complex shall have comprised of 4 Blocks,

consisting of GF and Offices. The maximum height of the building shall be 13.89 meter.

The project proponent has proposed to store non-agro based goods which will be non-

explosives non-hazardous & non-chemical in nature. The total water requirement shall be

53 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 37 KLD. The waste water generation shall

be 20 KLD which will be treated in STP of 25 KLD. The total power requirement shall

be 523.75 KVA which will be supplied by HVPNL. The Project Proponent has proposed

to develop green belt on 11096.272 sqm (20.98%) of project area (10880.839 sqm tree


water harvesting pits with dual bore. The solid waste generation will be 116 kg/day. The

total parking spaces proposed are 8152.83 sqm.


today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding quality of water, green belt

development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non-

applicability of Aravalli Notification, recycle and reuse of water etc. The representative

of the project proponent submitted NOC issued by DC Gurgaon regarding non-

applicability of Aravalli Notification but the project proponent failed to submit assurance

of competent Authority for supply of fresh water and informed that at present no local

water supply is available near the project area and they have proposed to meet with the 37

KLD of fresh water requirement from water supplier. The representative of the project

proponent also submitted copy of analysis report showing that the water is fit for human

consumption and assured that they will provide RO system for treatment of water to

make it fit for drinking purpose. It was noticed that the project proponent has proposed

that horticulture waste/bio-degradable will be composted in vermin composting pits but

the same is not earmarked on the plan.



the following conditions in addition to the usual conditions in practice and subject to the

6

submission of plan earmarking space for vermin composting of bio-degradable waste

within 15 days.

[1] The project proponent shall strengthen and maintain the road in front of the

proposed warehouse at own cost after taking approval from the relevant

authority.

[2] The project proponent shall provide RO System for purification of water making it

fit for drinking purpose.

[3] The project proponent shall store only non-agro, non-polluting, non-Inflammable

and non-Hazardous items /products in the warehouse.

[4] Pollution control measures for oil/diesel waste due to large no of Trucks involved

in transportation shall be made.

[5] The project proponent shall get approval of scheme for firefighting from the

concerned Authority before commissioning the project.

[6] The project proponent shall control fugitive emission due to loading, unloading

and other operations. In no case any truck/other vehicle should be parked on the

road side.

[7] The project proponent shall use only treated water for Horticulture.

[8] The project proponent shall submit plan earmarking space for vermin composting

of bio-degradable waste within 15 days.

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony at

Sector-114, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s KST Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended for initiating action for violation of EIA Notification

on the basis of report of sub-committee. The project proponent on 19.01.2015 submitted

application for obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification 14.09.2006.

The application was transferred to MoEF & CC, GoI in April 2015 due to lapse of the

term of SEIAA and subsequently MoEF & CC, GoI returned the application on

31.08.2015 after the reconstitution of SEIAA without taking any action.


meeting. It was noticed that the SEAC in its 120th meeting held on 06.11.2015 observed

that the project proponent has started the construction work. The sub-committee visited

the site on 02.12.2015 and reported that due to the non-availability of responsible person/

consultant from the project proponent side the detail of status of construction could not be

measures. There was no active construction activity at the site at the time of inspection

however the committee observed that there is substantial excavation in the main project

area in the past to facilitate the road at two corners in the project area. The constructed

structure of brick was with one of tin shed and other of RCC slabs was noticed on the

first floor level of about 100 x 40 feet each. At one of the locations the built up area was

7

being used for commercial purpose and recommended for initiating action for violation of

EIA Notification.

It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 03.02.2016 has

requested to visit the site again to see the actual position of their project at site as they

could not mobilize their team and co-ordinate with the committee members during the

site visit in a proper way as intimation was received only a day before the site visit.

In view of the above it was decided that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri

Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall inspect the project area site in

order to access the status of construction if any and shall submit the report to the SEIAA.

Accordingly the case was deferred.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of affordable Group Housing

project at Sector-27, Rewari, Haryana by M/s Victory Buildestates Pvt.

Ltd.



Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing project at

Sector-27, Rewari, Haryana on a total plot area of 20360.71 sqm (5.03 Acre). The total

built up area shall be 57005.33 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 05

Residential Blocks, Stilt + 11 Floors, 01 Commercial Complex (G+1) and 01 community

Centre. The Group Housing project shall have 792 Dwelling Units. The maximum height

of the building shall be 37.65 meter. The total water requirement shall be 581.7 KLD.

The fresh water requirement shall be 389 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 477

KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 580 KLD capacity. The total power

requirement shall be 2887.80 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4194.11 sqm (20.60%) of project area

(2077.4 sqm tree plantation + 2116.71 sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent


2134 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation

of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 950 Two

Wheelers and 9 ECS for Visitors.









8













be.




Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group

Housing Colony at Village Billah, Sector-14, Panchkula, Extension-II,

District Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Green Space Infraheights Pvt.

Ltd.



Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Colony at

Village Billah, Sector-14, Panchkula, Extension-II, District Panchkula, Haryana on a total

plot area of 20234.282 sqm (5 Acre). The total built up area shall be 44004.462 sqm. The

Group Housing project shall have Comprise of Stilt + GF + 13 Floors, Community

Building, Guard Room, Meter Room, Community Hall and Stilt area. The Group

Housing project shall have 786 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building

shall be 43.15 meter. The total water requirement shall be 554 KLD. The fresh water


be treated in the STP of 570 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 4800

KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop

green belt on 3849.108 sqm (20.66%) of project area (1954.575tree plantation +

1894.533 sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 5 rain water



converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 406 ECS.



9



















be.





Housing Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Padhana,

Sector-16, District Karnal, Haryana by M/s RAS Developments Pvt.

Ltd.



Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Colony

located in the revenue estate of Village Padhana, Sector-16, District Karnal, Haryana on a

total plot area of 28352.2 sqm (7 Acre). The total built up area shall be 59712.14 sqm.

The Group Housing project shall have 21 Residential Towers; Tower A-1 to A-8 with GF

+ 13 Floors, B-1 to B-13 with GF + 3 Floors, Commercial Building G+ 3, Community

Building and Aganwadi. The total Dwelling units shall be 1091. The maximum height of



KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 800 KLD capacity. The total power

requirement shall be 4691.29 KVA which will be supplied by UHBVN. The Project

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 5670.44 sqm (20%) of project area

10

(314.80 sqm tree plantation + 5355.614 sqm landscaping). The Project Proponent


2971 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation

of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 547 ECS.





















be.





Housing Project located in the revenue estate of Village Kasba Karnal,

Sector-35, Distt-Karnal, Haryana by M/s Santur Spaces Pvt. Ltd.



Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Affordable Group Housing Project

located in the revenue estate of Village Kasba Karnal, Sector-35, Distt-Karnal, Haryana

on a total plot area of 38485.54 sqm (9.51 Acre). The total built up area shall be

90532.107 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 12 Blocks with GF + 14 Floors,

Commercial Building 1 & 2, Community Hall (G) and Creche (G). The total Dwelling

units shall be 1371. The maximum height of the building shall be 50.35 meter. The total

11

water requirement shall be 1013 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 664 KLD.

The waste water generation shall be 816 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 980

KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 7542 KVA which will be supplied

by UHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 8542.897 sqm

(22.87%) of project area (8121.307 sqm tree plantation + 421.590 sqm landscaping). The

Project Proponent proposed to construct 11 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste

generation will be 3726 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project

area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will

be 3M x 4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 866 ECS.





















be.




Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for proposed 3 KLPD Grain Based Distillery

Project at Plot No. 358, Sector 3, Phase II, IMT Bawal Industrial

Estate, District Rewari (Haryana) by M/s Piccadily Sugar & Allied

Industries Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord Environmental Clearance by imposing

stipulations as stated therein was taken up in the today’s meeting it was noticed that the

project proponent has proposed to set up 3 KLPD Grain Based Distillery Project at Plot

12

No. 358, Sector 3, Phase II, IMT Bawal Industrial Estate, District Rewari (Haryana). The

TOR was approved in the 113th meeting of SEAC held on 09.10.2014. Public hearing is

exempted as the project is located in the notified Industrial Estate. The project proponent

on the basis of approved TOR submitted EIA/EMP which was taken up for appraisal in

the 125th meeting of SEAC held on 11.01.2016. The SEAC recommended this case for

environmental clearance under item no. 5 (g) of schedule as category B-1.

It was noticed that the main raw material required for the Distillery unit will be

broken/damaged Grains/Barley which are available in the local area the plot area is 1.945

acre. The process involved is Grain storage, Milling and Grain Flour handling, Slurry

Preparation and liquefaction, Fermentation, Decantation and Multi-effect evaporation.

The proposed Distillery unit would be based on “Zero Liquid Discharge”. All the major

source of Air Pollution will be provided with Multi-Cyclone with stack of adequate

height to maintain particulate matter emissions. The water requirement is 36 KLD. Boiler

ash will be sold to bricks manufacturers/ cement unit. DWGS will be sold as cattle feed.

It was observed that the project proponent has earmarked budget for CSR and the project

proponent has also submitted the details of expenditure to be incurred in respect of CSR.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to accept the

recommendations of SEAC and to accord environmental clearance for setting up 3 KLPD

Grain Based Distillery under item no. 5 (g) of schedule as category B-1 with the

following Specific and General Conditions for strict compliance by the project proponent.

Specific Conditions:

[1] Distillery unit shall be based on Grain based only and no Molasses based distillery

unit shall be operated with capacity of 3 KLPD. Working days of Distillery are

350 Days.

[2] The industry shall ensure that the treated effluent and stack emissions from the

unit are within the norms stipulated under the EPA rules or HSPCB whichever is

more stringent. In case of process disturbances/failure of pollution control

equipment adopted by the unit, the respective unit shall be shut down and shall not

be restarted until the control measures are rectified to achieve the desired

efficiency.

[3] The particulate emissions from the 01TPH boiler shall be controlled by installation

of ESP and emissions shall be dispersed though stack height as per the HSPCB

guidelines. The particulate emissions shall conform to the prescribed standards.

[4] The Company shall upload the status of compliance of the stipulated

environmental clearance conditions, including results of monitored data on its

website and shall update the same periodically. It shall simultaneously be sent to

the Regional Office of MoEF, the respective Zonal office of HSPCB and State

13

Pollution Control Board. The levels of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HC (ambient

levels), emissions from the stacks and PH, TDS, BOD, COD, Chloride, suspended

solids and sulphates in the treated effluent shall be monitored and displayed at a

convenient location near the main gate of the company and at important public

places.

[5] Spent wash generation shall not exceed 6 Kl/Kl of alcohol. Spent wash shall be

treated through decanter and concentrated in multi-effect evaporator (MEE) to

form DWGS. DWGS will be sold as cattle Feed. The condensate will be treated in

the ETP comprising neutralization and filtration (UF + RO). Treated effluent will

be used for makeup water of cooling towers and water quality of treated effluent

shall meet the norms prescribed by HSPCB/SPCB and recycle/reuse.

[6] The spent wash shall be stored in impervious pucca lagoons. The spent wash

lagoons shall have proper lining with HDPE and shall be kept in proper condition

to prevent ground water pollution. As per the HSPCB recommendation, storage

shall not exceed 5 days capacity

[7] Adequate numbers of ground water quality monitoring stations by providing

piezometers around the project area shall be set up. Sampling and trend analysis

monitoring must be made on monthly a basis and report submitted to HSPCB and

this Ministry. The ground water quality monitoring for pH, BOD, COD, Chloride,

Sulphate and suspended solids shall be monitored.

[8] Green belt in 33% of the plant area shall be provided to mitigate the effects of

fugitive emissions all around the plant as per HSPCB guidelines in consultation

with the local DFO.

[9] Company shall adopt rainwater harvesting measures to recharge the ground water.

[10] Occupational health surveillance programme shall be undertaken as regular

exercise for all the employees. The first aid facilities in the occupational health

centre shall be strengthened and the medical records of each employee shall be

maintained separately.

[11] Provision shall be made for the housing for the construction labour within the site

with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile

toilets, mobile sewage treatment plant, safe drinking water, medical health care,

crèche etc. The housing may be in the form of temporary structure to be removed

after the completion of the project. All the construction wastes shall be managed

so that there is no impact on the surrounding environment.

[12] No effluent from distillery shall be discharged outside the premises and Zero

discharge shall be adopted.

[13] Fly ash shall be stored separately as per CPCB guidelines so that it shall not

adversely affect the air quality, becoming air borne by wind or water regime

14

during rainy season by flowing along with the storm water. Direct exposure of

workers to fly ash & dust shall be avoided.

[14] Fire fighting system shall be as per norms and cover all areas where alcohol is

produced, handled and stored. Provision of foam system for firefighting shall be

made to control fire from the alcohol storage tank.

[15] Dedicated parking facility for loading and unloading of material shall be provided

in the factory premises. Unit shall develop and implement good traffic

management system for their incoming and outgoing vehicles to avoid congestion

on the public road.

[16] The project proponent shall set up STP of adequate capacity for treatment sewage

generated from the project.

[17] The Project Proponent will take proper mitigation measures to control the green

house effects, radiation effects, ozone depletion effects and acid rain effects during

the building construction phase and operation phase of the project.

[18] The gaseous emissions from DG set shall be dispersed through adequate stack

height as per CPCB guidelines. Acoustic enclosure shall be provided to the DG

sets to mitigate the noise pollution.

[19] In plant, control measures for checking fugitive emissions from all the vulnerable

sources shall be provided. Fugitive emissions shall be controlled by providing

closed storage, closed handling & conveyance of chemicals/materials, multi

cyclone separator and water sprinkling system. Dust suppression system including

water sprinkling system shall be provided at loading and unloading areas to

control dust emissions. Fugitive emissions in the work zone environment, product,

raw materials storage area etc. shall be regularly monitored and records shall be

maintained. The emissions shall conform to the limits prescribed by Haryana State

Pollution Control Board (HSPCB).

[20] Total fresh water requirement shall not exceed 36 KLD for this project.

General Conditions:

[i] Regular mock drills for the on-site emergency management plan specially

pertaining to fire and explosion hazards.

[ii] A separate Environment Management Cell with qualified staff shall be set up for

implementation of the stipulated environmental safeguards.

[iii] Half yearly report on the status of implementation of the stipulated conditions and

environmental safeguards shall be submitted to this SEIAA/HSPCB and Regional

Office of MOEF.

[iv] HSPCB and Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment & Forests located at

Chandigarh will monitor the implementation of the stipulated conditions.

15

[v] Separate funds shall be allocated for implementation of environmental protection

measures along with item-wise break-up. These cost shall be included as part of

the project cost. The funds earmarked for the environment protection measures

shall not be diverted for other purposes and year-wise expenditure should be

reported to the Ministry.

[vi] The project authorities shall inform the SEIAA/ Regional Office of MOEF

regarding the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the

concerned authorities and the dates of start of land development work and

commissioning of plant.

[vii] The project proponent shall advertise in at least two local newspapers widely

circulated in the region around the project, one of which shall be in the vernacular

language of the locality concerned within seven days from the date of this

clearance letter, informing that the project has been accorded environmental

clearance and copies of clearance letter are available with the State Pollution

Control Board/Authority may also be seen at Website of the SEIAA.

[viii] The SEIAA reserves the right to revoke the clearance if conditions stipulated are

not implemented to the satisfaction of the SEIAAE. SEIAA may impose

additional environmental conditions or modify the existing ones, if necessary.

[ix] The environmental clearance accorded shall be valid for a period of 5 years from

the start of production operations.

[x] In case of any deviation or alteration in the project proposed from those submitted

to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference should be made to the SEIAA to

assess the adequacy of the condition(s) imposed and to add additional

environmental protection measures required, if any.

[xi] The Project Proponent will provide Laboratory facilities for regular testing of Air

Emission, Effluent and Noise samples.

[xii] The company shall undertake CSR activities and all relevant measures for

improving the socio-economic conditions of the surrounding area.

[xiii] The above stipulations would be enforced among others under the Water

(Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control

of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and rules there

under, Hazardous Wastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 1989 and its

amendments, the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 and its amendments.

Item No.[13]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group

Housing Colony project at Village Fazilpur Jharsa, Sector-71, Distt.

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarvpriya Securities Pvt. Ltd.



16


project at Village Fazilpur Jharsa, Sector-71, Distt. Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area

of 24281.1 sqm (6 Acre). The total built up area shall be 56500.8 sqm. The proposed

Project shall comprise of GF + 10 Floors. The total Dwelling units shall be 980. The

maximum height of the building shall be 38.8 meter. The total water requirement shall be




Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 20.261% of project area (15% tree



degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic

waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 534 ECS.









was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC

vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and

the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.











be.




17

Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed ‘GARHI Stone mines Along

with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village-Garhi over an area of 6.70

ha in District-Mahendergarh by M/s Haryana Mining Company.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Haryana

Mining Company for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed ‘GARHI Stone mines Along

with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village-Garhi over an area of 6.70 ha in District-

Mahendergarh by imposing stipulations stated therein.


meeting. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a

period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI)

dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 6.70 ha having Khasra no. 07,

village GARHI. The project proponent on 19.01.2015 submitted online application along

with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in

the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has

clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly

the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been

obtained.

Brief details of the project:

1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-2

2. Location of Project Viillage Garhi, District-Mahendergarh

3. Project Details Khasra No.

/Production capacity

Mining of Stone along with Associated

Minerals Garhi, Khasra no. 07, over an area of 6.70

ha

22,50000 MT/year

4. Project Cost 60 lakh

5. Water Requirement & Source 26 KLD through Tankers

Dust suppression & Wet Drilling 20 KLD

Plantation 3 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD

6. Environment Management Plan

Budget

11.50 lakh

7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh

8. Production (Year wise)

Year Bench mrl Production in laks ton.

First 336 to 312 18.30

Second 306 to 288 22.30

Third 2 82 to 270 22.26

Fourth 264 to 252 22.26

Fifth 246 to 234 22.27

18

9. Green belt/ plantation

Year of Plantation Proposed Plantation

I Yr. 200 Trees

II Yr. 200 Trees

III Yr. 200 Trees

IV Yr. 200 Trees

V Yr. 200 Trees

10. Machinery required Excavator, Dozer Crawler Mounted,

Wagon Drill with inbuilt Compressors,

Air Compressor, Rock Breaker,

Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van



the following conditions.

A. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS:

[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for Production of Stone along with

Associated Minerals as per below mentioned figures.


First 336 to 312 18.30

Second 306 to 288 22.30

Third 2 82to 270 22.26

Fourth 264 to 252 22.26

Fifth 246 to 234 22.27

[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTE and CTO under Air Act and Water

Act from HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the

HSPCB.

[3] The project proponent shall carry out mining activity strictly as per the approved

mining plan.

[4] The project proponent shall ensure that the mining operations shall not intersect

groundwater table and the mining operation should be restricted at least 3 meter

above the ground water table.

[5] Topsoil shall be stacked temporarily at earmarked sites only and it shall not be

kept unutilized for a period more than three years; it shall be used for land

reclamation and plantation in mined out areas.

[6] The project proponent shall ensure that no natural water course/water body shall

be obstructed due to any mining operations.

[7] The over burden generated shall be stacked at earmarked dump site (s) only and it

shall not be kept active for long period of time. The maximum height of the

already existing waste dumps shall not exceed 5 meter in single terraces and the

slope angle shall not exceed 28o as per norms.

19

[8] The dumping site selected and proposed shall be used for OB dump at the

designated site within the lease area as per the approved mine plan. In no case the

overburden should be dumped outside the lease area.

[9] The benches height and slope shall be maintained as per approved mining plan.

[10] Waste dump shall be terraced. The height of the dump and its slope shall not

exceed as suggested in the approved mining plan. A retaining wall shall be

constructed at the toe of the dump.

[11] Garland drains shall be constructed to prevent the flow of the water in the dumps.

[12] Check dams shall be constructed in the seasonal rivulets to prevent the flow of

fines to low lying areas during rains.

[13] The total waste generated in the present plan period shall be as envisaged, which

shall be accommodated in old dumpsite in addition to the waste already dumped.

Monitoring and management of rehabilitated areas shall continue until the

vegetation becomes self sustaining. Compliance status shall be submitted to

HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly basis.

[14] Drills shall either be operated with dust extractors or equipped with water injection

system.

[15] The higher benches of excavated void/mining pit shall be terraced and plantation

done to stabilize the slopes. The slop of higher benches shall be made gentler for

easy accessibility by local people to use the water body. Peripheral fencing shall

be carried out along the excavated area.

[16] Catch drains and siltation ponds of appropriate size shall be constructed for the

working pit, OB dumps and mineral dumps to arrest flow of silt and sediment. The

water so collected shall be utilized for watering the mine area, roads, green belt

development etc. The drains shall be regularly de-silted, particularly after

monsoon and maintained properly.

[17] Garland drains; setting tanks and check dams of appropriate size, gradient and

length shall be constructed both around the mine pit and over burden dumps and

sump capacity shall be designed keeping 50% safety margin over and above peak

sudden rainfall (based on 50 years data) and maximum discharge in the area

adjoining the mine site. Sump capacity shall also provide adequate pits shall be

constructed at the corners of the garland drains and de-silted.

[18] Dimension of the retaining wall at the toe of dumps and OB benches within the

mine to check run-off and siltation shall be based on the rainfall data.

[19] Green belt should be developed as per the proposed plantation as given in the

proposal. Plantation should be carried out in phased manner. The green belt

should be developed in the safety zone around the mining lease by planting the

20

native species around ML area, OB dumps, backfilled and reclaimed around water

body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture Department.

[20] Regular water sprinkling shall be carried out in critical areas prone to air pollution

and having high levels of SPM and RPM such as haul road, loading and unloading

point and transfer points. It shall be ensured that the Ambient Air Quality

Parameters conform to the norms prescribed by the CPCB.

[21] The project authority shall implement suitable conservation measures to augment

ground water resources in the area in consultation with the Regional Director,

Central Ground Water Board.

[22] Regular monitoring of ground water level and quality shall be carried out in and

around the mine lease. The monitoring shall be carried out four times in a year-pre

monsoon (April-May), monsoon (August), post monsoon (November); winter

(January) and the data thus collected may be sent regularly to MOEF Regional

Office, Chandigarh and Regional Director CGWB.

[23] Data on ambient air quality and stack emissions shall be submitted to Haryana

Pollution Control Board once in six months carried out by

MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab.

[24] Vehicular emissions shall be kept under control and regularly monitored.

Measures shall be taken for maintenance of vehicles used in mining operations and

in transportation of mineral. The vehicles shall be covered with a tarpaulin and

shall not be overloaded. The project proponent shall ensure that the vehicle must

have pollution under control certificate.

[25] Blasting operation shall be carried out only during the daytime. Controlled

blasting shall be practiced. The mitigation measures for control of ground

vibrations and to arrest fly rocks and boulders shall be implemented.

[26] The blasting operation will be carried out as per the norms of Director (Mines &

Safety), Gaziabad. Take all safety measures as per the various mining regulations.

[27] The project proponent shall take all precautionary measures during mining

operations for conservation and protection of endangered fauna, if any, spotted in

the study area. A plan for conservation shall be drawn and approved by the State

Wildlife Department. Necessary allocation of funds for implementation of the

conservation plan shall be made and the funds so allocated shall be included in the

project cost. All the safeguard measures brought out in the wildlife conservation

plan so prepared specific to the project site shall be effectively implemented. A

copy of action plan may be submitted to the HSPCB and MOEF, Regional Office,

Chandigarh within 3 months.

21

[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 11.50

lakh as cost for implementing various environmental protection measures

including recurring expenses per year.

[29] A sum of Rs. 22 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for

investment as CSR on socio economic up-liftment activities of the area

particularly in the area of habitat, health or education, training programme of rural

women & man provide the kit for employment generation. The proposal should

contain provision for monthly medical camps, distributions of medicines and

improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Details of such

activity along with time bound action plan be submitted to HSPCB/SEIAA

Haryana before the start of operation.

[30] Budgetary provision of Rs. 03 lakh per year earmarked for the labours working in

the Mine for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation

facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps and

toilets for women, crèche for infants should be made and submitted to HSPCB at

the time of CTE/CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided

for mining labours.

[31] A Final Mine Closure Plan along with details of corpus fund shall be submitted to

the SEIAA well within the stipulated period as prescribed in the minor mineral

concession rules 2012.

[32] The water reservoir, which would be created/available during post closure (all

pits), shall be provided with suitable benches and fencing to provide the access to

the water body and safety.

[33] The project proponent shall ensure that the EC letter as well as the status of

compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s

website and displayed at the project site.

[34] The project proponent shall ensure that loading in Trucks do not exceed the norms

fixed by the Transport Department as per relevant rules.

[35] The project proponent shall ensure approach roads are widened and strengthened

as per requirements fixed by PWD and district administration before the start of

the work.

[36] The project proponent shall ensure that all measures are taken simultaneously for

safeguard and maintenance of the health of the workers.

[37] The project proponent shall ensure supply of drinking water through RO.

GENERAL CONDITIONS:

[i] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without

prior approval of the SEIAA.

22

[ii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and

waste shall not be made.

[iii] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,

SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided

based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and

ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in

consultation with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board (HSPCB). Six

monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the

HSPCB/CPCB including the MOEF, Regional office, Chandigarh.

[iv] Measures shall be taken for control of noise levels below 85 dBA in the work

environment. Workers engaged in operations of HEMM etc. shall be provided

with earplugs/muffs.

[v] Waste water (workshop and waste water from the mine) shall be properly

collected & treated so as to conform to the standards prescribed under GSR 422

(E) dated 19th May 93 and 31st December 1993 (amended to date). Oil and grease

trap shall be installed before discharge.

[vi] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they

shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health

aspects.

[vii] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken

periodically to observe any contractions due to exposure to dust and take

corrective measures, if needed.

[viii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in

separate account and shall not be diverted for other purpose. Year wise

expenditure shall be reported to the HSPCB and the Regional office of MOEF

located at Chandigarh.

[ix] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of

compliance of the stipulated EC conditions including results of monitored data

(both in hard copies as well as by e-mail) to the northern Regional Office of

MoEF, the respective Office of CPCB, HSPCB and SEIAA Haryana.

[x] The SEIAA, Haryana reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any

of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of

any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Haryana or any other competent

authorities is not satisfactory.

[xi] Failure to comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in

withdrawal of this clearance and attract action under the provisions of

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

23

[xii] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water

(Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 the Air (Prevention & Control of

Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Public

Liability Insurance Act 1991 (all amended till date) and rules made hereunder and

also any other orders passed by the Honb’le Supreme Court of India/High Court of

Haryana and other Court of law relating to the subject matter.

[xiii] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded

Environment Clearance by the SEIAA and copies of the clearance letter are

available with the Haryana State Pollution Control Board & SEIAA. This should

be advertised within 7 days from the date of issue of the clearance letter at least in

two local newspapers that are widely circulated in the region and the copy of the

same should be forwarded to SEIAA Haryana. A copy of Environment Clearance

conditions shall also be put on project proponent’s web site for public awareness.

[xiv] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from

the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department,

Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be

obtained, as may be applicable, by Project proponent from the competent authority

before the start of mining operation.

[xv] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does

not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed

under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete

responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the

time being in force, rests with the industry/unit/project proponent. Any appeal

against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if

preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of National

Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony

Project located at Village-Naurangpur, Sector-80, District Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s R.P.Estates Pvt. Ltd.



Commercial Colony Project located at Village-Naurangpur, Sector-80, District Gurgaon,

Haryana on a plot area of 12089.9 sqm (2.9875 Acres). The total built up area shall be

35983.11 sqm. The proposed project shall comprise of 3 basements + GF + 24 Floors.

The maximum height of the building shall be 93.45 meters. The total water requirement

shall be 236 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 146 KLD. The waste water

generation shall be 100 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 120 KLD capacity.

In the today’s meeting the detail it was observed by the Authority that:

24

1. The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of



2. The height of the proposed building 93.45 Meter. The Structural stability

certificate not obtained.

3. The License is valid up to 07.12.2015. The project proponent is required to submit

validated license.




Notification.

Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Stone along with associated

minor minerals of Kheribattar-1 over and tentative area of 7.47 Ha. in

Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Quality Earth

Minerals Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Quality

Earth Minerals Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Stone along with

associated minor minerals of Kheribattar-1 over and tentative area of 7.47 Ha. in Tehsil-

Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana by imposing stipulations stated therein.




dated 21.10.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 7.47 Ha having Khasra no.

136, village Kheribattar-1. The project proponent on 29.12.2015 submitted online

application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of

Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The

Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500

meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2.

NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village -Kheribattar-1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-

Bhiwani


/Production capacity


Minerals Kheribattar-1, Khasra no. 136, over an

area of 7.47 ha

1800000 MT/year

4. Project Cost 10 Crores



Plantation 10 KLD

Drinking 4 KLD

25


Budget

13.50 lakh




First 250 to 235 16,00000

Second 235 to 217 17,00000

Third 217 to 199 18,00000

Fourth 199 to 181 18,00000

Fifth 181 to 163 18,00000



I Yr. 250 Trees

II Yr. 250 Trees

III Yr. 250 Trees

IV Yr. 250 Trees

V Yr. 250 Trees












First 250 to 235 16,00000

Second 235 to 217 17,00000

Third 217 to 199 18,00000

Fourth 199 to 181 18,00000

Fifth 181 to 163 18,00000

[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTE and CTO under Air Act and Water

Act from HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the

HSPCB.


mining plan.







26





















HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly basis.


system.
















27







































28




















for mining labours.














the work.




29

GENERAL CONDITIONS:





















aspects.
















30






























Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for proposed Residential Plotted Colony

along with Group Housing Project located at Village Mohmmadpur

Gujjar & Sohna, Sector-2, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Supertech

Limited.



Residential Plotted Colony along with Group Housing Project located at Village

Mohmmadpur Gujjar & Sohna, Sector-2, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of

406177.9 sqm (100.368 Acres); (20.16 Acres Group Housing) (80.20875 Acres Plotted

Colony). The total built up area shall be 514990.913 sqm. The proposed project shall

31

have 15 Towers; Tower 1, 3 to 7- Basement + Stilt + 18 floors, Tower 2 – Basement +

Stilt + 22 floors, Tower 8 to 11 – Basement + GF + 18 floors, Tower 12,13 – Basement +

GF + 24 floors, Tower 14 – Basement + GF + 22 floors, Tower 15 – Basement + GF + 18

floors, EWS – Basement + GF + 9 floors. The Plotted area shall have 691 no. of

Residential units (138 EWS units + 370 units + 183 NPNL units). The Group Housing

component shall have 1692 no. of dwelling units (1324 Flats + 234 EWS units + 134

Service units). The maximum height of the building shall be 80.85 meter. The total water


waste water generation shall be 2346 KLD which will be treated in the 2STPs of 2820

KLD (1600 KLD + 1220 KLD) capacity. The total power requirement shall be 11784.09

KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop

green belt on 158450 sqm (39%) of project area (16957.23 sqm tree plantation + 35244.1

avenue plantation + 107248.6 sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to


The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by adopting appropriate

technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 2683 ECS.


taken up for consideration. It was observed that the project proponent on 20.01.2015. the

case was transfer to MoEF & CC, GoI due to lapse of the term of SEIAA. The MoEF &

CC, GoI in its 148th meeting held on 20.05.2015 approved the TOR and convey to the

project proponent on 22.06.2015. The case was again transferred on 31.08.2015 after the

constitution of SEIAA. On the basis of the approved TOR the project proponent on

28.08.2015 submitted the EIA/EMP report. Detailed discussions were held regarding

water requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality,

NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and

reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. The representative of the project

proponent submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of

EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection,

drainage system, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli

Notification and structural stability certificate. It was observed that the details of

calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste

not discussed. The space allocated in the project for management of solid waste not

earmarked on the plan.




submission of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of bio-

32

degradable waste and space allocated in the project area for management of solid waste

on the plan within 15 days.





be.

[4] The project proponent shall submit details of calculation of Solid Waste

Generation and process for treatment of bio-degradable waste and the space

allocated in the project for management of solid waste on the plan.

Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Punjab National Bank

Institutional Building at Plot No. 84, Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana by

Punjab National Bank.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Punjab

National Bank Institutional Building at Plot No. 84, Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana on a

total plot area of 14947.8 sqm (3.69 acre). The total built up area shall be 27312 sqm. The

proposed Project shall comprise of 02 Basements + Stilt + Maximum 7 Floors. The

maximum height of the building shall be 38.70 meter. The total water requirement shall

be 87 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 57 KLD. The waste water generation

shall be 38 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 50 KLD capacity. The total power

requirement shall be 3578.38 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project



water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 216 kg/day. The bio-degradable


converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces








NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was observed that the project proponent

has not mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,


degradable waste.

33















for the treatment of bio-degradable waste within 15 days


Housing Project “Laxmi Apartments” at Sector-99 A, Dwarka

Expressway, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pareena Infrastructures Pvt.

Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Project “Laxmi Apartments” at Sector-99 A, Dwarka

Expressway, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 19882.17 sqm (4.913 Acres). The

total built up area shall be 46440.332 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 09

Towers consisting of Basement + Stilt + 12 Floors. The total Dwelling units shall be 804.

The maximum height of the building shall be 44.65 meter. The total water requirement


generation shall be 446 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 630 KLD capacity. The

total power requirement shall be 6810 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The

Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4003.58 sqm (20.13%) of

project area (1592.874 sqm tree plantation + 1061.892 sqm avenue plantation + 1348.82

sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting

pits. The solid waste generation will be 1660.685 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will

be treated in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total



discussions were held regarding existence of revenuer rasta, gas pipe line, water

requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC

regarding non-involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse

of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was found that the project proponent

34

submitted the assurance of HUDA for supply of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding

non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.

It was noticed that the project proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC

vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and

the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.











be.




Item No.[20]Environmental Clearance for “Tulip Homes” Group Housing Project,

at Sector-69-70, Gurgaon by M/S Tulip Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

The representation dated 07.12.2015 submitted by the project proponent claiming

deemed environmental clearance for its project in contrast to the recommendations of

SEAC and to review the decision, in respect of the captioned project was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. The detailed examination of the representation

manifests that SEAC in its 55th Meeting held on dated 09.03/10.03..2011 had

recommended their project for environment clearance after due appraisal and

consideration of events. The recommendations for grant of Environmental Clearance to

the project had been sent to SEIAA on 14.03.2011.

However, due to procedural constraints i.e termination of tenure of SEIAA, the

project of the project proponent could not be considered by SEIAA for Environment

Clearance as observed by SEAC. The matter was then transferred to MOEF for the

needful action as per provision of the EIA Notification. The EAC of MoEF, GoI

considered this case in its 105th meeting held on 23.09.2011 i.e. after six months of

recommendation of SEAC. The EAC of MoEF GoI raised some observations and no

further action was taken the case was transferred to SEIAA after its reconstitution. The

project proponent submitted an undertaking that they started the construction on

15.07.2011 after the expiry of four months from the date of recommendation for EC of

35

their project proposal by SEAC considering their case as deemed cleared case as per para

8 of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 but on the contrary the SEIAA decided to

recommend this case to PS Environment Haryana for initiating legal action against

Project Proponent for starting construction without obtaining prior environmental

clearance as per prescribed procedure of MOEF GOI.

The case of other Developer i.e M/s Ninex Developers, of same arena have been

brought into the light by the project proponent wherein the claim of M/s Ninex

Developers that their project proposal qualifies for deemed clearance as per para 8 (iii

and iv) was accepted by SEIAA under similar circumstances, thus they can’t be put under

the hammer of discrimination in violation to it fundamental rights. All the aspects have

been brought into light by project proponent and whereby claimed deemed approval of

environmental clearance by harping upon MOEF GOI Notification dated 14.09.2006

coupled with case of Ninex Developer and recommendations of SEAC observed vide

55th meeting dated14.032011.

This case has been examined in the light of clause (iii) and (iv) under Para no. 8 of

EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and on the submissions detailed vide representation

dated 7th December, 2015. It has been observed that the project proposal qualifies for

deemed approval after 45 days from 14.03.2011 as the SEAC in its meeting held on

09/10.03.2011 had recommended this case for Environmental Clearance to SEIAA for

grant of Environmental clearance but no such decision on the recommendation of SEAC

had been conveyed by SEIAA to the project proponent within the stipulated period.

In view of the above discussions the Authority agreed to review its decision taken

in 79th meeting held on 09.01.2015 and decided that the project proposal qualifies for

deemed clearance after the expiry of 45 days of recommendation of SEAC dated

14.03.2011 for granting environment clearance to the project; in view of para no. 8 (iii

and iv) of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and also decided that the project proponent

shall comply with the conditions as stated therein in the recommendation of SEAC of 55th

meeting held on 09/10.03.2011.

On 01.03.2016

Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony located at

Village Bajghera, Sector-114, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Candeo Projects Pvt. Ltd.



Commercial Colony located at Village Bajghera, Sector-114, District Gurgaon, Haryana

on a total plot area of 49925.26 sqmt (12.3368 acres). The total built up area shall be

197594.39 sqmt. The proposed project shall have of 4 basements + GF + maximum 13

36

Floors, Service Apartment, Food Court and Multiplex. The maximum height of the


water requirement shall be 269 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 397 KLD


be 8000 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed

to develop green belt on 31.84% of project area (20% tree plantation + 11.84%


The solid waste generation will be 2562 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are

3064 ECS.


today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent on 13.11.2013 submitted

application for environmental clearance and SEAC in its 98th meeting held on 08.01.2014

recommended this project for environment clearance. The SEIAA in its 73rd meeting held

on 18.07.2014 referred back the case to SEAC with the advice to appraise this project on

the basis of Notification dated 26.02.2014 requiring approval of TOR and preparation of

EIA/EMP. The SEAC 111th meeting held on 09.09.2014 approved the TOR. The project

proponent on 14.09.2015 submitted EIA/EMP. The EIA/EMP was finally considered by

SEAC in its 127th meeting and SEAC again recommended this case of environment

clearance.

Detailed discussions were held regarding revenue rasta, water requirement, quality

of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-



assurance of HUDA for supply of water along with copies of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA

for the services for supply of water, sewerage connection and drainage system, NOC

from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification and NOC from

AAI regarding height clearance. It was also noticed that the project proponent has

earmarked the space for solid waste management site on the plan for collection,

segregation and treatment of bio-degradable waste but the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the

generation of bio-degradable waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process

involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.








37













project area.










Item No.[22]Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Plotted

Colony” project located at Sector 6, Agroha, Dist Hisar, Haryana by

M/s Office of the Executive Engineer HUDA


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for construction of

“Residential Plotted Colony” project located at Sector 6, Agroha, Dist Hisar, Haryana on

a total plot area of 819082.44 sqm (202.40 Acres). The total built up area shall be

402477.97 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of Residential Plots, Group

Housing & EWS, Banquet hall, Nursing homes, High schools/Primary school/ Nursery

schools & Institutional centre, Shopping centre, Day care centre & crèche, Police Post,

Taxi Stand etc. The total water requirement shall be 3137 KLD. The fresh water

requirement shall be 1797 KLD/ canal supply. The waste water generation shall be 2208

KLD, which will be treated in the Common STP (CSTP). The CSTP treated water shall

be used for flushing, horticulture and other misc. purposes.


taken up for consideration. It was observed by the Authority that:

38

[1] The project proponent has proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by adopting

OWC but the details of OWC capacity and area on the plan was not earmarked.

[2] The project proponent has proposed to treat waste water in the common STP but

the details of common STP its location on the plan and the status of development

of STP was not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit location of

STP and its status of development.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to recycle and re-use the treated water the

details of which were not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit

dual plumbing plan and re-use/recycle of treated water.

[4] The project proponent is required to submit the name and designation of the

officer who shall be responsible for implementation of the stipulated conditions

and safeguards of environment clearance.

In view of the above observations the Authority decided to defer to this case with

the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above

observation within 15 days.

Item No.[23]Environmental Clearance for the Adesh Haryana University located at

Village Mohri, Dist Kurukshetra, Haryana by M/s Adesh Welfare

Society.

The SEAC has recommended initiating legal action against the project proponent

under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 as the project proponent has completed the

construction of Hospital project without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The

SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and

27.06.2013.


today’s meeting. It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of

OM of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter

no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from

MoEF&CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view

the quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF

& CC, GOI has been received.

In view of the above the Authority decided to keep this case pending till

clarification is received from MoEF & CC, GoI.

Item No.[24]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group

Housing Colony located at revenue estate of Village Bhatola, Sector-

82, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s S3 Infrareality Pvt. Ltd.




located at revenue estate of Village Bhatola, Sector-82, Faridabad, Haryana on a total plot

area of 20234.25 sqm (5 acre). The total built up area shall be 51465.27 sqm. The Group

39

Housing project shall have 8 Towers + S + 13 Floors, Aganwadi. The Group Housing

project shall have 816 Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be



the STP of 585 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 4372.5 KVA which


on 378.287 sqm (20.82%) of project area (719.362 sqm tree plantation + 1894.95 sqm



in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking








and NOC from DFO regarding Non involvement of Forest land. It was observed that the

project proponent has submitted calculations and detail of the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis

the generation of bio-degradable waste and the process involved for the treatment of bio-

degradable waste.








be.

Item No.[25]Environmental for construction of commercial Colony located in

revenue estate of Village Badshahpur, Sector-70 of GMUC, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Ojos Developers Pvt. Ltd.



Commercial Colony located in revenue estate of Village Badshahpur, Sector-70 of

GMUC, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 9813.611 sqm (2.45 acre). The total

built up area shall be 30135.2 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 02 Basements

+ GF + Maximum 10 Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 49.13 meter.

The total water requirement shall be 309 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 213

40

KLD. The waste water generation shall be 120 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of

200 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 2332 KVA which will be


2319.4 sqm (25.02%) of project area (176.9 sqm tree plantation + 1072 sqm



in the project area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required

for OWC-60 will be 3M x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 413 ECS.







NOC from AAI regarding height clearance. It was observed that the project proponent

has submitted calculations and detail of the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of

bio-degradable waste and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.










Item No. [26] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP/CETP Project at

Village Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana

by Public Health Engineering Division: Appeal to review the decision.

Chairman SEIAA permitted to take up the representation received from Executive

Engineer Public Health Kurukshetra. The Engineer in Chief Public Health Department,

Haryana appeared before the Authority in the today’s meeting with the copy of Memo

No. 2602 dated 29.02.2016 with the appeal to review the decision taken by SEIAA in

their case as conveyed to them vide SEIAA letter dated 22.01.2016.

The representative of the Department claimed that they are proposing to construct

STP and not CETP and they have got the waste water samples of the area analyzed from

HSPCB and as per the opinion of HSPCB no industrial effluent is flowing in either the

drain or the sewer. The representative of the project proponent requested to reconsider the

case as it does not fall under the purview of item no 7 (h) of EIA Notification 14.09.2006.

41

It was noticed that Hon’ble NGT has passed directions to the project proponent to

get environmental clearance under item no. 7 (h) of EIA Notification 14.09.2006 from

SEIAA before the start of construction. The representative of the project proponent also

clarified that their Department had challenged the orders of Hon’ble NGT in the Hon’ble

Supreme Court but the Hon’ble Supreme Court has declined their appeal. The

representative of the project proponent was asked to provide the copy of orders passed by

Hon’ble Supreme Court. The representative of the project proponent further clarified that

they will again get the analysis of waste water samples from HSPCB and NABL/MoEF

approved lab.

It was observed that the project proposal is under active consideration of SEAC

for appraisal and it was decided to forward the copy of representation submitted by the

project proponent to SEAC with the advice to examine the same on merit keeping in view

the orders passed by the Hon’ble Courts vis-à-vis the applicability of EIA Notification.

The decision of the Authority was also conveyed to the representative of the project

proponent present in the meeting.

****

1


held on. 28.03.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.




Item No.[1]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing

Colony Project at Village Sohna & Khaika, Sector-4, Distt Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s GLS Infratech Pvt. Ltd.



observations.

1. The project proponent has proposed to develop green area on 15.66% of the

project area whereas in the conditions it has been mentioned that the project

proponent shall maintain 20% green area. The project proponent on 28.10.2015

submitted revised plan showing 20% green area. The SEAC should examine the

same.




treatment of bio-degradable waste. The project proponent shall submit plan

depicting the area ear marked for composting.








taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by project

proponent and considered by SEAC was found in order.






2



be.

[4] Adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities shall be provided for construction

workers at the site. Provision should be made for mobile toilets. Open defecation

by the laboures is strictly prohibited. The safe disposal of solid wastes/ waste water

generated during the construction phase should be ensured. Efforts shall be made to

provide mobile STP for treatment of waste water during the construction phase.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed project 15 Acres “Cyber Park”

at Village-Fazilpur, Jharsa & Bhadshahpur, Sector-69, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Unitech Limited.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Cyber

Park” at Village-Fazilpur, Jharsa & Bhadshahpur, Sector-69, Gurgaon, Haryana on a plot

area is 60702.75 sqm (15 Acres). The total built up area shall be 349976.90 sqm. The

proposed project shall comprise of 05 Towers in which 4 Basement + GF + maximum 21

floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 95.05 meters. The total water


waste water generation shall be 878 KLD, which will be treated in the 3 STPs of 500

KLD, 300 KLD & 200 KLD capacities.









was noticed that the project proponent has proposed to use excavated Top soil for use of

landscaping and has proposed to stack the same in the project area covering the same

with Tarpaulin. The project proponent is required to give exact quantum of Top soil to be

excavated and also brief description for its preservation in order to control its erosion. It

was observed that as a mitigation measure under Water Environment due to improper

disposal of construction debris leading to offsite contamination of water reserves; the

project proponent has proposed disposal of construction debris in low lying area. The

project proponent is required to submit the area identified for the same. It was observed

that the project area is at a distance of 9 km from National Highway and is located along

90 meter wide Southern Peripheral Road and the project proponent on the basis of

PCU/hr calculated for NH-8 and Sohna Road has claimed that since carrying capacity of

3

NH-8 is much higher than proposed traffic volume therefore the traffic movement from

the proposed Cyber Park will not create any traffic congestion. The project proponent is

required to justify the same with authenticated proof.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer to this case with

the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below

mentioned observation within 15 days.

[1] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding provisions made for

preservation of Top soil in the project area in order to avoid its erosion.

[2] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding disposal method of

construction debris in the low lying area as reported in the EIA/EMP.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the claim that the carrying capacity of NH-8 is

much higher than the proposed traffic volume and traffic movement from the

proposed project will not create any congestion on NH-8 with calculations and

authenticated proof.

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for the proposed ‘Stone Along with

Associated Minor Minerals’ at ‘Ramalwas’ over an area of 12.25 Ha.

In Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani by M/s Kayden Infra Engineering

Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended granting Environment Clearance to M/s Kayden

Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed ‘Ramalwas’ Stone

mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Ramalwas over an area of

12.25 Ha in Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani by imposing stipulations stated therein.




dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 12.25 Ha having Khasra no.

105/1, Village- Ramalwas. The project proponent on 12.09.2015 submitted online








2. Location of Project Village- Ramalwas, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani


Production capacity


Minerals Ramalwas, Khasra no. 105/1, over an area

of 12.25 Ha

20,00,000 Ton/year

4. Project Cost 8.5 Crores

4



Plantation 9 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD


Budget

13.50 lakh



Year Bench mrl Production

First 284 to 254 20,00,000 Ton

Second 254 to 230 20,00,000 Ton

Third 230 to 218 20,00,000 Ton

Fourth 218 to 206 20,00,000 Ton

Fifth 206 to 194 20,00,000 Ton



I Yr. 250 Trees

II Yr. 250 Trees

III Yr. 250 Trees

IV Yr. 250 Trees

V Yr. 250 Trees












First 284 to 254 20,00,000 Ton

Second 254 to 230 20,00,000 Ton

Third 230 to 218 20,00,000 Ton

Fourth 218 to 206 20,00,000 Ton

Fifth 206 to 194 20,00,000 Ton

[2] The project proponent shall obtain prior CTO under Air Act and Water Act from

HSPCB and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated by the HSPCB.


Mining Plan.




5
























HSPCB and MOEF Zonal Office, Chandigarh on six monthly bases.


system.













6







































7






















the time of CTO/SEIAA Haryana. The housing facilities should be provided

for mining labours.














the work.

8




GENERAL CONDITIONS:





















aspects.














9
































Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Stone Along with

Associated Minor Minerals’ at ‘Maikalan & Maikhurd’ over an area of

3.65 Ha. In Tehsil Dadri, District-Bhiwani by M/s Hari Har Mining

Company.

The SEAC has recommended granting Environment Clearance to M/s Hari Har

Mining Company for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed ‘‘Maikalan & Maikhurd’

Stone mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Maikalan & Maikhurd

over an area of 3.65 Ha. In Tehsil Dadri, District-Bhiwani by imposing stipulations stated

therein.

10


meeting. It was observed that the mine lease area is less than 5 Ha and as such the

environmental clearance in this case is to be granted by DEIAA/DEAC in view of

amendment to the Notification dated 15.01.2016. It was found that MoEF & CC, GoI vide

letter no. Z-11013/8/2016-IA.II (M) dated 15.03.2016 has clarified that where SEAC has

recommended the cases for environmental clearance such cases are to be processed at the

level of SEIAA for grant of environmental clearance. Accordingly it was decided to take

up the case as recommended by SEAC. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology

Department has granted lease for a period of 10 years subject to the terms and conditions

as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 24.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an

area of 3.65 Ha having Khasra no. 315, 230 & 233 village- Maikalan & Maikhurd. The

project proponent on 13.08.2015 submitted online application along with copy of approved

Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for

5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other

mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised

this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village- Maikalan & Maikhurd Tehsil Dadri,

District-Bhiwani


Production capacity


Minerals Maikalan & Maikhurd, Khasra no315, 230

& 233, over an area of 3.65 Ha

10,00,000 TPA




Plantation 6 KLD

Drinking 2 KLD


Budget

11.50 lakh




First 330 to 300 10,00,000 TPA

Second 300 to 289 10,00,000 TPA

Third 289 to 282 10,00,000 TPA

Fourth 282 to 270 10,00,000 TPA

Fifth 270 to 250 10,00,000 TPA

11



I Yr. 200 Trees

II Yr. 200 Trees

III Yr. 200 Trees

IV Yr. 200 Trees

V Yr. 200 Trees












First 330 to 300 10,00,000 TPA

Second 300 to 289 10,00,000 TPA

Third 289 to 282 10,00,000 TPA

Fourth 282 to 270 10,00,000 TPA

Fifth 270 to 250 10,00,000 TPA




Mining Plan.
















12














system.

























13







































14











for mining labours.














the work.




GENERAL CONDITIONS:










15












aspects.



























16



















Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Stone Along with Associated

Minor Minerals” at Karota over an area of 9.55 Ha. under Category

“B2” in Tehsil-Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by M/s HGEL

Integrated Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s HGEL

Integrated Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Karota” Stone mines

Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Karota over an area of 9.55 Ha in

Tehsil-Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by imposing stipulations stated therein.




dated 02.09.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 9.55 Ha having Khasra no. 61

min village- Karota. The project proponent on 19.10.2015 submitted online application

along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2. The validity of Mining

Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology,

Department has clarified that no other mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this

mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest

Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village- Karota Tehsil-Narnaul, District-

Mahendergarh

17


Production capacity


Minerals Karota, Khasra no. 61 min, over an area of

9.55 Ha

15,00,000 TPA




Plantation 8 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD


Budget

16 lakh




First 348 to 330 15,00,000 TPA

Second 330 to 318 15,00,000 TPA

Third 318 to 300 15,00,000 TPA

Fourth 300 to 282 15,00,000 TPA

Fifth 282 to 270 15,00,000 TPA



I Yr. 200 Trees

II Yr. 200 Trees

III Yr. 200 Trees

IV Yr. 200 Trees

V Yr. 200 Trees












First 348 to 330 15,00,000 TPA

Second 330 to 318 15,00,000 TPA

Third 318 to 300 15,00,000 TPA

Fourth 300 to 282 15,00,000 TPA

Fifth 282 to 270 15,00,000 TPA



18


Mining Plan.





























system.








19







































20












[28] As envisaged, the Project Proponent shall invest at least an amount of Rs. 16
















for mining labours.










21





the work.




GENERAL CONDITIONS:





















aspects.








22






































23

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for proposed Mining of Boulder, Gravel and

Sand (Minor Mineral) at Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19 over an area

of 12.62 Ha. in District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Ganga

Yamuna Mining Co.

The SEAC has recommended to grant Environment Clearance to M/s Ganga

Yamuna Mining Co. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand of “Bhood Kalan Block

/YNR B-19” at Village- Bhood Kalan over an area of 12.62 Ha by imposing stipulations

stated therein.




dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 12.62 Ha having Village-

Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19. The project proponent on 11.09.2015 submitted online








2. Location of Project Village- Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19 District

Yamuna Nagar


Production capacity

Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor

Mineral) Bhood Kalan Block /YNR B-19, over area

of 12.62 Ha

2,59,000 TPA @35 Trips/day (25 Mt/Trip)




Plantation 12 KLD

Drinking 2 KLD


Budget

9.25 lakh

7. CSR Activates Budget 10.25 Lakh

8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @

2,59,000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will

be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 297-

298 armsl.

9. Corner Coordinates of the lease

area

Corners Latitudes Longitudes

A N 30O 15’21.9” E077O 29’37.4”

B N 30O 15’29.8” E077O 29’37.5”

C N 30O 15’17.5” E077O 29’52.7”

D N 30O 15’21.6” E077O 29’42.2”

24



I Yr. 400 Trees

II Yr. 400 Trees

III Yr. 400 Trees

IV Yr. 400 Trees

V Yr. 400 Trees

11. Machinery required Excavator, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light

Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van





[1] This Environment Clearance is granted for the proposed production for the five

years @ 2,59,000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be 9 meter. The

alivation range of mine site is 297-298 armsl. The Corner Coordinates of the

leased area are:


A N 30O 15’21.9” E077O 29’37.4”

B N 30O 15’29.8” E077O 29’37.5”

C N 30O 15’17.5” E077O 29’52.7”

D N 30O 15’21.6” E077O 29’42.2”


Mining Plan.

[3] Environmental Clearance is subject to obtaining clearance, under the Wildlife

(Protection) Act, 1972 from the National Board of Wildlife, as applicable to the

project.

[4] No mining activities will be allowed in forest area, if any, for which the Forest

Clearance is not available.

[5] The Project proponent shall obtain consent to Operate from the State Pollution

control Board, Haryana and effectively implement all the conditions stipulated

therein.

[6] Project Proponent shall appoint an Occupational Health Specialist for Regular and

Periodical medical examination of the workers engaged in the project and records

maintained; also, Occupational health check-ups for workers having some

aliments like BP, diabetes, habitual smokers, etc. shall be undertaken once in six

months and necessary remedial/preventive measures taken accordingly.

Recommendations of National Institute for labour for ensuring good occupational

environment for mine workers would also be adopted.

25

[7] Project Proponent shall appoint a Monitoring Committee to monitor the

replenishment study, traffic management, levels of production, River Bank erosion

and maintenance of Road etc.

[8] The number of trips of the trucks shall not exceed the estimated quantity of 875

Mt/day @35 Trips/day (25 Mt/Trip). Transport of minerals shall be done either by

dedicated road or it should be ensured that the trucks/dumpers carrying the mineral

should not be allowed to pass thought the villages.

[9] Project Proponent shall ensure that the road may not be damaged due to

transportation of the mineral; and transport of minerals will be as per IRC

Guidelines with respect to complying with traffic congestion and density.

[10] Excavation will be carried out up to a maximum depth of 3 meters from surface of

mineral deposit and not less than one meter from the water level of the River

channel whichever is reached earlier.

[11] The pollution due to transportation load on the environment will be effectively

controlled & water sprinkling will also be done regularly. Vehicles with PUCC

only will be allowed to ply. The mineral transportation shall be carried out through

covered trucks only and the vehicles carrying the mineral shall not be overloaded.

Project should obtain ‘PUC’ certificate for all the vehicles from authorized

pollution testing centre.

[12] Washing of all transport vehicles should be done inside the mining lease.

[13] Permanent pillars has to be constructed to demarcate width of extraction of ROM

leaving 25% of River width from the bank with depth of 1.5m below the ground

and 1.2 m above the ground to observe its stability.

[14] There shall be planning, developing and implementing facility of rainwater

harvesting measures on long term basis in consultation with Regional Director,

Central Groundwater Board and implementation of conservation measures to

augment ground water resources in the area in consultation with Central Ground

Water Board.

[15] The Project Proponent shall also take all precautionary measures during mining

operation for conservation and protection of endangered flora/fauna, if any,

spotted in the study area.

[16] Main haulage road in the mine should be provided with permanent water

sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted

with sprinklers.

[17] Provision shall be made for the housing of construction labour within the site with

all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as fuel for cooking, mobile toilets,

mobile STP, safe drinking water, medical health care, crèche etc. The housing may

26

be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the

project.

[18] No River sand mining shall be allowed in rainy season.

[19] The project proponent shall submit annual replenishment report certified by an

authorized agency. In case the replenishment is lower than the approved rate of

production, then the mining activity/ production levels shall be decreased/ stopped

accordingly till the replenishment is completed.

[20] In River flood plain mining a buffer of 3 meter to be left from the River bank for

mining.










native species around lease boundary and haul roads , backfilled and reclaimed

around water body, road etc. in consultation with the local DFO/Agriculture

Department.


















27













[31] A sum of Rs. 10.25 lakh shall be earmarked by the Project proponent for













for mining labours.



concession rules 2012..








the work.


28

GENERAL CONDITIONS:

[i] Concealing factual data or submission of false/fabricated data and failure to

comply with any of the conditions mentioned above may result in withdrawal of

this clearance and attract action under the provisions of the Environment

(Protection) Act, 1986.

[ii] Any change in mining technology/scope of working shall not be made without


[iii] Any change in the calendar plan including excavation, quantum of mineral and


[iv] Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5,







[v] Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they


aspects.

[vi] Occupational health surveillance program of the workers shall be undertaken



[vii] The funds earmarked for environmental protection measures shall be kept in




[viii] The project proponent shall also submit six monthly reports on the status of




[ix] The above conditions will be enforced, inter alia, under the provision of the Water






[x] The Project proponent should inform the public that the project has been accorded


29






[xi] All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from





[xii] That the grant of this EC is issued from the environmental angle only, and does








Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for proposed Special Economic Zone at Village

Behrampur, Balola & Bandhwari, Gurgaon by M/s G.P.Realtors Pvt.

Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of Special

Economic Zone at Village Behrampur, Balola & Bandhwari, Gurgaon on a plot area of

38.12 acres (1st phase for EC 12.5835 acre). The total built up area shall be 103807.64

sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 Basement + GF + 5 Floors. The maximum




requirement shall be 6250 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project



water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 1.5 ton/day (OWC proposed for

1716 kg/day). The total parking spaces proposed are 1299 ECS.


discussions were held regarding water requirement, HT line, quality of water, green belt




30



not clearly mentioned the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable

waste, dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment of

bio-degradable waste. It was noticed that for disposal of 32 KLD of waste water from

labour camp the project proponent has proposed to provide soak pit. It was observed that

the project proponent should provide mobile STP/STP for treatment of waste water

generated from the labour camp during construction phase. It was also noticed that the

capacity of STP proposed to be set up in operation phase is inadequate. The project

proponent is required to revise the capacity of STP from proposed 300 KLD.






degradable waste; provision of mobile STP/STP for treatment of waste water generation

from the labour camp and adequately revised capacity of STP within 15 days.


reserved/acquired for High Tension Wire passing through the project area and shall

maintain horizontal and vertical ROW as required under Indian Electricity Rules,

1956/DHBVN latest instructions.

[2] The project proponent shall set up STP of 350 KLD capacity in operation phase.

[3] The project proponent shall provide STP/mobile STP for treatment of 32 KLD of

waste water proposed to be generated from the labour camp during construction

phase.






[5] The project proponent shall submit the following information within 15 days.

(i) Capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable waste,

dimensions of the earmarked area and the process involved for the treatment

of bio-degradable waste.

(ii) Provision of mobile STP/STP for treatment of 32 KLD of waste water

generation from the labour camp during construction phase.

(iii) Revised capacity of STP to be set up during operation phase.

31

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project

measuring (18.675 + 5.88472 = 24.55972 acres) at Vilalge Dhorka,

Sector-95, Gurgaon, Haryana by Benchmark Infotech Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for construction of Group

Housing Project measuring (18.675 + 5.88472 = 24.55972 acres) at Vilalge Dhorka,

Sector-95, Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 99389.6 sqm (24.55 Acres). The total

built up area shall be 287179.9 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 Basements

+ GF + 17 floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 26.5 meter. The total

water requirement shall be 1201 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 694 KLD.

The waste water generation shall be 902 KLD, which will be treated in the STP 1100

capacity.









was noticed that the project proponent has proposed to use excavated Top soil for use of

landscaping and has proposed to stack the same in the project area covering the same

with Tarpaulin. The project proponent is required to give exact quantum of Top soil to be

excavated and also brief description for its preservation in order to control its erosion. It

was noticed that the project proponent has proposed to reuse construction debris and

demolition debris; the project proponent is required to submit the details of the same. The

project proponent has not discussed the storm water management during construction

phase the project proponent is required to submit the same. It was noticed that the project

proponent has not clearly mentioned the capacity and dimensions of OWC to be installed

for treatment of bio-degradable waste.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer to this case with

the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the below


[1] The project proponent shall submit details regarding provision made for

preservation of Top Soil in the project area.

[2] The project proponent shall submit details of reuse of construction

debris/demolition debris during construction phase.

[3] The project proponent shall submit capacity and dimensions of OWC proposed to

be installed for treatment of bio-degradable waste.

32

Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of commercial colony project

located at Sector-6 & 11 in Revenue Estate of Ratgal, District-

Kurukshetra, Haryana by M/s Divine Vision Infraestate Pvt. Ltd.



construction of Commercial Colony project without obtaining prior environmental

clearance. The SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated

12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013.




no. SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF &

CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in view the

quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response from the MOEF &

CC, GOI has been received.



Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project

at Village Badshahpur, Sector-65, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Manglam

Multiplex Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 128th meeting held on 26-02-2016 has referred this case to the

SEIAA for rejecting the environment clearance application on the grounds that the

project proponent has submitted separate application for the additional licensed area of

3.518 acres (2.081 acres + 1.437 acres of license no. 114 & 122 of 2014) which is in

contagious with the existing project area of 254925.63 sqm (license no. 234 of 2007, 52

of 2009 and 35 of 2010).

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up in the today’s meeting. It was noticed

that the project proponent has submitted fresh application for obtaining environmental

clearance for 3.518 acres of additional license which is in contiguity with the existing

project area of 254925.63 sqm for which the environmental clearance was granted by

SEIAA vides letter no. 1092 dated 28.10.2009 and subsequently the extension of validity

of EC was also granted to the project proponent vide letter no. 61 dated 05.01.2015. The

existing project proposal is under initial stage of construction and the project proponent is

required to submit the application for the additional area of 3.518 acre (license no. 122

and 114 of 2014) in conjunction with the existing project under expansion.

In view of the above the Authority accepted the recommendation of SEAC and

decided to reject the application. It was also decided that the project proponent may be

asked to submit fresh application for additional area of 3.518 acres in conjunction with

the existing project under expansion.

33

Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for Revision/Modification of Group Housing

Project (37.512 acres) at Sector-67A, Village Dhumsapur and

Maidawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Precision Realtors Pvt.

Ltd.


for environment clearance. The project proponent for seeking environment clearance for

Revision/Modification of Group Housing Project (37.512 acres) at Sector-67A, Village

Dhumsapur and Maidawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana with the proposal as given under:

Details EC Granted After revision Difference

Plot Area 37.512 acres nil nil

Built up area 812877.08 sqm 804646.73 sqm -8230.35 sqm

Green Area 45.02% 45.02% Nil

No. of Dwelling

units

1780 1685 -95

EWS units 315 315 Nil

Parking 3545 ECS 3752 ECS 208 ECS

Power Demand 15174.7 KW 14845.1 KW -329.5 KW

RWH pits 20 pits 26 pits 6 pits

Solid Waste 4.8 TPD 4.410 TPD -0.390 TPD

Total Water

Requirement

2359 KLD 1758 KLD -601 KLD

Waste water

generation

1320 KLD 1120 KLD -200 KLD

Treated Water 1254 KLD 923 KLD -331 KLD

STP capacity 2300 KLD 2300 KLD nil


taken up for consideration. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent has not proposed any change in the DG set configuration

whereas water consumption for cooling has been reduced in the revised

submission. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.

[2] The project proponent has proposed to reduce Dwelling units by 5.4% in revision

application whereas the water requirement has been proposed to be reduced by

24.43% .The project proponent is required to clarify the same.

[3] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water demand for

maintenance/Arboriculture by 60.54%. The project proponent is required to justify

the same.

[4] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water requirement

by 24.77% . The project proponent is required to justify the same.

[5] The project proponent in the revised proposal has proposed the reduction of waste

water generation by 15% whereas the treated waste water has been shown reduced

by 26%. The project proponent is required to justify the same.

[6] On page 50 of presentation the diameter of recharge pit has been shown as 25

meter against the requirement of 2.5 meter. The project proponent is required to

clarify the same.

34

[7] The project proponent in the revision application has calculated water requirement

for visitors @ 10% whereas the solid waste generation has been calculated @ 5%.

The project proponent is required to clarify the same.

[8] The project proponent has not submitted the details regarding treatment of bio-

degradable waste. The project proponent is required to submit the details regarding

treatment of bio-degradable waste within the project area and should submit a plan

earmarking space for management of bio-degradable waste.

In view of the above observations the Authority decided to defer to this case with

the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above


Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group

Housing” project at Village-Mujeri, Sector-70, Faridabad, Haryana by

M/s Agrasain Spaces.



“Affordable Group Housing” project at Village-Mujeri, Sector-70, Faridabad, Haryana on

a total plot area of 21650.85 sqm (5.35 acre). The total built up area shall be 49375.498

sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 07 Towers Stilt + 14 Floors & Stilt + 06

Floors. The Group Housing project shall have 720 Dwelling Units, Commercial 1 & 2,

Aaganwadi cum Creche, Community Hall. The maximum height of the building shall be



the STP of 515 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3044 KW which will

be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on

4256.79 sqm (21.04%) of project area (13.04 tree plantation + 8% landscaping). The

Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste

generation will be 1688 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project

area by installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed

are 720 Scooter 390 ECS.


taken up for consideration. Detailed discussions were held regarding HT line, gas pipe

line, water requirement, quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air

Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water,

parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was noticed that the project proponent has

submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid to HUDA for the services for supply of water,

sewerage connection and drainage system and NOC from DFO regarding Non

involvement of Forest land. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted

calculations and detail of the capacity of OWC vis-à-vis the generation of bio-degradable

waste and the process involved for the treatment of bio-degradable waste.

35








be.





[5] The project proponent shall not raise any construction in the ROW reserved

for Gas Pipe Line.






Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for Regarding Extension of validity period

by 5 years of Environmental Clearance Letter issued for the project

“Uniworld Resorts”-Residential ploted colony with other

infrastructure Amenities at Sector-33 & 48, Gurgaon by M/s Unitech

Residential Resorts Ltd.

The project proposal relates to grant of extension of validity of EC. The project

proponent on 12.06.2013 submitted application seeking extension of validity of EC of the

environmental clearance granted by MoEF & CC, GoI on 03.12.2007 for the project. The

case was lastly taken up by SEIAA in its 77th meeting held on 14.11.2014. The project

proponent vide letter 13.11.2014 informed that the civil construction work of the project

has already been completed as per approved plans and within the validity of EC letters

and requested for withdrawal of the application. The SEIAA decided to refer back this

case to SEAC to inspect the site and to assess the status of construction. The sub-

committee tried to contact the project proponent for doing inspection. The report is

incomplete and not signed by other member.

The case was taken up in the today’s meeting, it was observed that the project

proponent vide letter on. URRL/Uniworld Resorts/EC/2402/2016 dated 24.02.2016 has

intimated that they have obtained Consent to Operate from the HSPCB on 13.02.2016 it

was noticed that the MoEF & CC, GoI has granted EC to the project proponent under

category 8(b) as the project area is more than 50 Ha and as per provision contained in

36

para 9 of EIA Notification 14.09.2006 the validity period of item 8(b) is limited only to

such activities as may be the responsibility of the applicant as a developer. It was not

clear whether the project proponent has carried out construction of the project as per

approved plans. The Authority decided that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri

Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site to check whether

the construction raised by the project proponent is in accordance with the approved plans

or not and shall submit the report to the SEIAA. Accordingly the case was deferred.

Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for Expansion and Modernization of DLF

Commercial Project Corporate Green (IT Office, Retail and

Studio/Service Apartment) at Sector-74A, Gurgaon by M/s DLF

Universal Ltd.

The case was lastly considered in the 87th meeting held on 05.02.2016 wherein the

Authority decided that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.

Mishra, Members SEAC shall monitor the compliance of the conditions imposed in the

EC letter and shall submit the report to the SEIAA and the case was deferred.

In the today’s meeting the report dated 14.03.2016 of sub-committee was taken up

for consideration. It was found that the sub-committee in its report has reported that the

project proponent is complying with the conditions imposed in the EC letter. The

Authority decided to accept the recommendation of SEAC and to grant environmental

clearance for Expansion and Modernization of DLF Commercial Project Corporate Green

(IT Office, Retail and Studio/Service Apartment) at Sector-74A, Gurgaon by imposing

standard conditions as recommended by SEAC and subject to the following additional

conditions.



project area.














37



Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for Mining of “Brick Earth”

The matter regarding grant of environmental clearance to the project proponents

engaged in mining of “Brick Earth” required for brick-kiln units was taken up in the

today’s meeting. It was informed that in compliance of the Hon’ble Supreme Court

Orders the SEIAA started receiving the applications from Brick-Kiln owners for

environmental clearance of their Mining projects. The SEIAA in October 2012 received

118 applications for environmental clearance. The applications could not be appraised as

there was no set procedure and the requirement of environmental clearance was

challenged in the Hon’ble NGT. Now MoEF&CC, GoI vide amended Notification SO

141 (E) dated 15.01.2016 has prescribed procedure for granting environmental clearance

to the Mining projects having project area less than 5 Ha. As per this amended

Notification the 118 applications pending with SEIAA now require environment

clearance from the DEIAA/DEAC under category B2.

In view of the above it was decided to file all the 118 applications pending with

SEIAA as environmental clearance applications in case of these projects shall now be

processed at the level of DEIAA/DEAC under category B2 projects.

******

1


held on. 22.04.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.

The full Authority is present. At the outset the Authority discussed the issue

regarding provision for adequate drinking water and sanitary facilities for construction

workers at site. The Authority observed that as per the reports/complaints being received

by SEIAA the project proponents are not providing sanitary facilities and not maintaining

hygienic conditions for construction workers at site. It was found that most of the project

proponents are not submitting the details regarding quantum of requirement of drinking

water along with its source; waste water generation and its treatment at site in the labour

camp area. In certain cases the project proponents are giving exaggerated values of

drinking water requirement during construction phase; not matching with the labour

employed, which can lead to misuse of potable water i.e for use in construction activities

despite the imposition of blanket ban on the use of potable water/ground water for

construction purposes. It was felt by the Authority that to examine the impact of project

activity during construction phase on water regime, this information is of vital

importance as project proponents are required to provide sufficient drinking water and

also the provision for treatment of waste water. Accordingly it was decided that the

project proponents may be advised to furnish the additional information as given under:

1. The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculation of drinking water

requirement and its source for construction workers.

2. The project proponent shall submit the detail calculation of waste water generation

during construction phase in the labour camp area and also the treatment of waste

water. The project proponent shall provide STP for treatment of waste water if the

waste water generation is 10 KLD and above.

It was also decided to incorporate the above requirement in the check list and

upload the modified check list on Haryana Portal. Thereafter the Cases recommended by

SEAC for Environmental Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated

vide letter No. 252-254 dated 12.04.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were

taken:-

Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for proposed commercial colony INXT CITY

CENTER at village Shikopur, Sector-83, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Trishul Industries.

This case was lastly considered in the 83rd Meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015


observations.

(i) The project proponent has not submitted assurance of water supply from


2

(ii) The project proponent has not submitted assurance of power supply from


(iii) The project proponent shall obtain copy of valid accreditation certificate issued

by NABET/QCI in respect of EIA consultant engaged by them and submit the

same to the SEAC.

(iv) The SEAC shall ensure that Khasra no. indicated in the NOC regarding non



(v) The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking declaring that no

construction has been started at the site along with photograph to the SEAC.

(vi) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking





22.12.2015 and the same was found in order. The SEAC has again recommended this

case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. It was found that the project proponent has not

given detailed calculations of drinking water for construction workers along with source;

waste water generation and its treatment scheme in the labour camp area during

construction phase. It was also observed that in the solid waste management plan the

project proponent has proposed to use empty cement bags for making of road; the project

proponent is required to explain the same with proper justification. It was noticed that in

the water balance diagram the project proponent has proposed to use 133 KLD of treated

water for HVAC make-up; the project proponent is required to justify the same.



the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the following information within

15 days.

[1] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for

construction workers along with source; waste water generation and its treatment

scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for

STP/Mobile STP in case waste water generation is 10 KLD and above.

[2] The project proponent shall explain with proper justification about the use of

empty cement bag for making of road.

[3] The project proponent shall justify with authenticated calculation the use of 133

KLD for HVAC make-up.

3

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for the Project “Vatika Express City”

Resedential plotted Colony on total land measuring 100.875 acres

located in the revenue estate of village Harsaru, Hayatpur, Sector-88A

and 88B, Distt-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vatika Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 83rd Meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015


observations.

(i) The project proponent shall submit self contained note with authenticated proof

about the shifting of HT lines and showing that the vacant unplanned pockets in

the licensed area are actually affected by the existence of HT lines. The proposed

plan of the said un planned pocket areas, once HT lines are shifted.

(ii) The project proponent shall submit revised green belt development plan

earmarking space of make provision for green-park for the residents as per

assurance given in the meeting.

(iii)The project proponent shall provide Old age home on 0.25 acre of licensed area

and shall submit a plan.

(iv)The project proponent shall submit dual plumbing plan showing layout of infra

structure facilities without crossing revenue rasta.



case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. It was found that the project proponent has not

given detailed calculations of drinking water for construction workers along with source;

waste water generation and its treatment scheme in the labour camp area during

construction phase. It was also observed that in the solid waste management plan the

project proponent has proposed to use empty cement bags for making of road; the project

proponent is required to explain the same with proper justification. It was noticed that in

the water balance diagram the project proponent has proposed to use 03 KLD of treated

water for DG set cooling; the project proponent is required to justify the same.



the conditions subject to satisfactory submission of the following information within 15

days.



scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase.



4

[3] The project proponent shall justify with authenticated calculation the use of 03

KLD of treated water for DG set cooling.


Housing Colony “Happy Homes” located in the revenue estate of

Village Budena, Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Auric Homes

Pvt. Ltd.



observations.

(i) The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking





(ii) The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper



(iii)The project proponent shall submit solar path analysis.


24.02.2016 wherein the project proponent claimed deemed clearance under para 8 of EIA

Notification dated 14.09.2006 and decided that the subject matter regarding deemed

clearance does not fall under the preview of SEAC and referred the case to SEIAA for

taking decision.

In the today’s meeting the letter dated 15.03.2016 claiming deemed clearance

under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 was taken up for consideration along with the

copy of reply to the above observations. It was noticed that the project proponent

informed that their project proposal was recommended for environmental clearance by

SEAC in its 118th meeting held on 03.03.2015 and no decision was conveyed to them

within 45 days after the recommendation of SEAC and as such their project proposal

becomes deemed cleared. It was also noticed that the project proponent has submitted an

undertaking stating that the construction activity at the site was started in June 2015

which shows that project proponent started the construction after the expiry of 45 days

from the date of recommendation of SEAC but failed to submit any authenticated proof

in support of his contention. It was also observed that in the solid waste management plan

the project proponent has proposed to use empty cement bags for making of road; the

project proponent is required to explain the same with proper justification.

5

In view of the above the Authority decided to defer this case to the next meeting

with the decision that the project proponent shall submit the following information within

15 days.

[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of authenticated document establishing

that the construction activity was undertaken after the expiry of 45 days of

recommendation of SEAC.



Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project at

Village Khanpur and Kawarsika, Sector-17, Sohna, Tehsil Nuh, Mewat,

Haryana by M/s Goldsouk Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC in its 118th meeting held on 03 & 04 March 2015 has recommended the

project for environmental clearance. The recommendation of SEAC could not be taken

up by SEIAA due to expiry of its term in March 2015. The case file was transferred to

MoEF, GoI for further action.The recommendation of SEAC was considered by MoEF &

CC, GoI and it was observed that:

[1] There is no clarity on source of water supply during operational phase of the

project, and its sustainability. In case of ground water withdrawal, the project

needs to be examined by CGWA vis-à-vis cumulative water withdrawal and

the recharging/replenishment in the area.

[2] For surface water availability, the PP needs to provide firm commitment from

HUDA, considering overall water balance of the area.

[3] Impact on ambient air quality due to increased traffic volume needs to

be evaluated.

[4] The project site has to be in conformity with the land use as per the

regional plan approved by NCR Planning Board the PP needs to provide

necessary confirmation in this regard.

[5] It is not clear from the documents submitted by the Project Proponent

whether the project is in sewered area or unsewered area. If it is in unsewered

area then how the disposal of treated effluent especially in rainy season is

proposed.

The project proponent vide letter dated 30.10.2015 submitted the reply which was

taken up by SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 10.12.2015. The SEAC observed that the

project proponent has failed to submit the reply in respect of Sr. No. 2 above and advised

the project proponent to submit the complete reply. The project proponent vide letter

dated 04.01.2016 submitted the reply which was again considered by SEAC in its 129th

meeting held on 15.03.2016 and the same was found in order. The SEAC has again

recommended this case for Environmental Clearance.

6

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration along with copy of

the reply submitted by the project proponent in the today’s meeting. The Authority after

discussions observed that:

[1] The project proponent was asked to submit reply with respect to observation

“Impact on ambient air quality due to increased traffic volume needs to be

evaluated” whereas the project proponent has given a vague reply. The project

proponent is required to give the values of existing AAQ of the project area,

predicted values of AAQ due to increased traffic volume and detailed mitigation

measures to be adopted for management of environment.



scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in

case the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 182 KLD to water tankers for

construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same

specifically mentioning the requirement of number of tankers per day and the

impact of the same on AAQ due to movement of tankers carrying vehicles and

mitigation measures.

In view of the above it was decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the

advice to re-examine the project proposal on the observations as raised above by the

Authority and send its recommendations on merit within stipulated period as prescribed

in the notification.

Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony


Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd.



observations.










7











case for Environmental Clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration along with copy of

the reply submitted by the project proponent in the today’s meeting. The Authority after

discussions observed that:

[1] The proposed built up area of the project 149449.28 sqm. The SEAC is required to

calculate the built up area as clarified in the MoEF OM F. No, 19-127/2011-IA-III

dated 02.04.2012 and thereafter re-appraise the project proposal as per procedure

prescribed in the Notification if the proposed built up area found to be 15,0000

sqm or above.





[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 230 KLD to water tankers for









Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of 12.5 MLD CETP (in two

modules of 6.25 MLD each) in HSIIDC Industrial Area, Bahadurgarh,

Jhajjar, Haryana by HSIIDC Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of 12.5

MLD CETP (in two modules of 6.25 MLD each) in HSIIDC Industrial Area,

8

Bahadurgarh, Jhajjar, Haryana on a the total developed area of Industrial Estate is 732

Acres set up prior to 14.09.2006 and project proponent has earmarked 6.73 acres of

land for setting up of CETP of 12.5 MLD capacity in two modules of 6.25 MLD

capacities each. The project proponent has also proposed green belt on 8908 sqm

(32.7% Acre) i.e. 6060 sqm green belt plantation + 2250 sqm Avenue plantation + 598

sqm Lawn area). The units in this Industrial Estate are mostly green and orange

category and are less water intensive. The major types of industries are General

Engineering, Automobile related assembling, workshops, Footwear Industries,

Readymade garments and Corrugated Paper boxes etc.

The technology for proposed CETP is CMAS (Continuous Mixed

Aeration System) with following treatment units i.e. Screen Chamber, Oil cum grease

removal traps, Grit removal system / Pre- settlers, Equalization tank. Flash

mixing Tanks, Primary Clarifier, Aeration Tank, Secondary clarifier, ludge

handing system- Filter press, Tertiary Treatment Pump House, Dual Media Pressure

Filers and other necessary attached auxiliary units.

The power requirement is 800 KVA sourced from UHBVN. The Source of

water supply is through Bahadurgarh water supply channel. The present waste water

generated is 3.5 MLD from the existing units of about 189 out of total 658 units. The

chemical sludge generated would be of 2.5ton/day which will be disposed of to

GEPIL TSDF, Pali at Faridabad with prior consent from HSPCB.


meeting. The Authority observed that the project is eco-friendly and the establishment

of CETP is for treatment of effluent from the industries will help to maintain the

sustainability.



the conditions as recommended by SEAC except condition at serial no.(ii) of Specific

Conditions.

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for our Educational Project “Amity

University” at Village Panchgaon, Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Amity University.








9



proponent.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing

Colony project at Village Dhamlaka, Sector-26 & 27, Rewari,

Haryana by M/s B.M Gupta Developers Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Colony project at Village Dhamlaka, Sector-26 & 27, Rewari,

Haryana on a total plot area of 24179.929 sqm (5.975 acre). The total built up area shall

be 63177.86 sqm. The Group Housing project shall have 4 Towers, Tower P-01 (GF + 24

Floors), Tower P-02 (Commercial), Tower P-03 (GF + 23 Floors) and Tower P-04 GF +

11 Floors). The maximum height of the building shall be 75.45 meter.


[1] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 221.6 KLD of treated water in

the Drain which is not acceptable. The project proponent is required to submit

revised proposal ensuring that the treated waste water is recycled/reused and

excess of treated waste water is discharged in public sewer system.





[3] The height of the building is 75.45 meters the project proponent is required to

obtained structural stability certificate from the competent authority.

[4] The project proponent has given different figures of stack height 2.82 meter (in

presentation copy) and 6.32 meter (in conceptual plan) above the building height.

The project proponents clarify the same.

[5] The project proponent has not discussed in detail the storm water management

plan during construction phase. The project proponent is required to submit the

same.

[6] In the soil investigation report it has been mentioned that the ground water table

was encountered at 9.5 to 9.9 meter depth, whereas as per Draft Revised Regional

Plan-2021 the average ground water table of Rewari is 16.3 meter. The project

proponent is required to clarify the same with authenticated proof/document.




Notification.

10


located at Sector-2, Sohna, Haryana by M/s Metro Techno Build Pvt.

Ltd.



Housing Colony located at Sector-2, Sohna, Haryana on a total plot area of 49068.13 sqm

(12.125 acres). The total built up area shall be 110780.54 sqm. The proposed project shall

have 8 Tower; Convenient Shopping, Nursery School, Community Building and EWS

units (130 Nos.). The maximum height of the building shall be 65.1 meter. The total

water requirement shall be 617 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 400 KLD. The

waste water generation shall be 492 KLD which will be treated in the STP 600 KLD

capacity.


meeting. The Authority after discussions observed that







[3] The project proponent shall give the details of area required for storage of STP

sludge.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the

decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above raised



Project located at Village Dhunela, Sector-34, Sohna, District-

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s CHD Develpers Ltd.



Commercial Colony located at Village Dhunela, Sector-34, Sohna, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana on a total plot area of 40569.671 sqm (10.025 acres). The total built up area

shall be 97119.995 sqm. The proposed project shall have 12 Tower; GF + Maximum 15

Floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 49.95 meter. The total water

requirement shall be 271.7 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 173.5 KLD. The

waste water generation shall be 343 KLD which will be treated in the 3 STPs 395 KLD

(320 + 65 + 10) capacities.



11







[3] The project proponent has proposed to use drip irrigation for horticulture and

landscaping and has proposed to use 6 lit/sqm of treated water. The project

proponent is required to justify the use of 6 lit/sqm of treated water with




[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking on the non-judicial stamp paper

declaring that:

(i) They will not discharge treated/untreated waste water in the nallah passing

through the project area.

(ii) The natural flow of nallah shall not be obstructed.




Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of POL Terminal at Piyala,

Near Faridabad, Haryana by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

The SEAC in its 94th meeting held on 12.11.2013 approved the TOR and in its

104th meeting held on 12.05.2014 recommended this case for environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered by SEIAA in its 72nd meeting and the

same was referred back to SEAC with the advice to ask the project proponent to get the

public hearing conducting as there is no exemption of public hearing stage in view of the

provisions of Notification.

In the 122nd meeting of SEAC held on 26.11.2015 the project proponent informed

the committee that their case was appraised by EAC of MoEF & CC, GoI in its 44th

meeting held on 21.07.2015 and certain observations were raised. The project proponent

on 19.08.2015 submitted the reply to the observations raised by EAC of MoEF. The reply

submitted by the project proponent was discussed and it was observed by SEAC that the

project proponent has failed to submit complete reply to the observations pointed out by

EAC of MoEF, GoI.

The project proponent on 23.02.2016 submitted a letter which was considered in

the 129th meeting of SEAC held on 14.03.2016. It was pointed out by the project

proponent that their case was appeared in 3rd and 5th EAC meetings held on 18 & 19 Jan.

12

2016 and 25 & 26 Feb. 2016 respectively where in the MoEF has suggested to withdraw

the case from SEAC, Haryana.


meeting. The Authority decided to accept the recommendation of SEAC for withdrawal

of the application as requested by project proponent subject to the submission of copy of

environmental clearance letter in the office of SEIAA by the project proponent as and

when the same is accorded by MOEF & CC, GOI. It was also decided to forwarded the

copy of withdrawal letter to MOEF & CC, GOI for information


“MICASA” at Sector 68 (HD), Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Pareena Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.



Housing Project “MICASA” at Sector 68 (HD), Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana on a

total plot area of 54562.753 sqm (13.48275 acres). The total built up area shall be

149385.579 sqm. The proposed project shall have 08 Towers; Stilt + Maximum 35

Floors. The Group Housing project shall have 952 Dwelling Units. The maximum height

of the building shall be 115.25 meter. The total water requirement shall be 925.035 KLD.

The fresh water requirement shall be 520.28 KLD. The waste water generation shall be

610.036 KLD which will be treated in the STP 735 KLD capacity.



[1] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of treated water for DG set

cooling of 3000 KVA capacity (power backup only). The project proponent is

required to explain the same with proper justification and calculation.








Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Plotted

Colony” project located at Sector 6, Agroha, Dist Hisar, Haryana by

Office of the Executive Engineer HUDA.


and the case was deferred with the following observations.

[1] The project proponent has proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by adopting

OWC but the details of OWC capacity and area on the plan was not earmarked.

13

[2] The project proponent has proposed to treat waste water in the common STP but

the details of common STP its location on the plan and the status of development

of STP was not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit location of

STP and its status of development.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to recycle and re-use the treated water the

details of which were not submitted. The project proponent is required to submit

dual plumbing plan and re-use/recycle of treated water.

[4] The project proponent is required to submit the name and designation of the

officer who shall be responsible for implementation of the stipulated conditions

and safeguards of environment clearance.

In the today’s meeting the reply dated 01.04.2016 submitted by project proponent

was taken for discussion and the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of

SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions

in practice.

Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed project 15 Acres “Cyber Park”

at Village-Fazilpur, Jharsa & Bhadshahpur, Sector-69, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Unitech Limited.





[2] The project proponent shall submit the details regarding disposal method of

construction debris in the low lying area as reported in the EIA/EMP.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the claim that the carrying capacity of NH-8 is

much higher than the proposed traffic volume and traffic movement from the

proposed project will not create any congestion on NH-8 with calculations and



was taken for discussion. It was noticed that the project proponent has claimed that they

don’t have any analysis data of any Government agency for comparison with the analysis

carried out by their consultant who is QCI/NABET approved consultant. The Authority

decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to

this project by imposing the usual conditions in practice subject to submission of an

undertaking by the project proponent on non-judicial stamp paper declaring that:

[1] That, no data is available on traffic survey for NH-8 at Gurgaon from any Govt.

Agency, hence data collected for the proposed 15 Acre “Cyber Park” at sector-

69. Gurgaon cannot be compared with any authentic data.

14

[2] That the traffic analysis is done by QCI/NABET accredited consultant M/s Perfact

Enviro Solutions Pvt. Ltd. as per MoEF & CC, GoI approved Construction

Manual.

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project

measuring (18.675 + 5.88472 = 24.55972 acres) at Vilalge Dhorka,

Sector-95, Gurgaon, Haryana by Benchmark Infotech Pvt. Ltd.



[1] The project proponent shall submit details regarding provision made for

preservation of Top Soil in the project area.

[2] The project proponent shall submit details of reuse of construction

debris/demolition debris during construction phase.

[3] The project proponent shall submit capacity and dimensions of OWC proposed to

be installed for treatment of bio-degradable waste.




in practice.

Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for Revision/Modification of Group Housing

Project (37.512 acres) at Sector-67A, Village Dhumsapur and

Maidawas, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Precision Realtors Pvt.

Ltd.



[1] The project proponent has not proposed any change in the DG set configuration

whereas water consumption for cooling has been reduced in the revised

submission. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.

[2] The project proponent has proposed to reduce Dwelling units by 5.4% in revision

application whereas the water requirement has been proposed to be reduced by

24.43% .The project proponent is required to clarify the same.

[3] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water demand for

maintenance/Arboriculture by 60.54%. The project proponent is required to justify

the same.

[4] The project proponent in the revised proposal has reduced the water requirement

by 24.77% . The project proponent is required to justify the same.

[5] The project proponent in the revised proposal has proposed the reduction of waste

water generation by 15% whereas the treated waste water has been shown reduced

by 26%. The project proponent is required to justify the same.

15

[6] On page 50 of presentation the diameter of recharge pit has been shown as 25

meter against the requirement of 2.5 meter. The project proponent is required to

clarify the same.

[7] The project proponent in the revision application has calculated water requirement

for visitors @ 10% whereas the solid waste generation has been calculated @ 5%.

The project proponent is required to clarify the same.

[8] The project proponent has not submitted the details regarding treatment of bio-

degradable waste. The project proponent is required to submit the details regarding

treatment of bio-degradable waste within the project area and should submit a plan

earmarking space for management of bio-degradable waste.




in practice.

Item No.[17] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the Environmental

Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006;

for development of Residential Plotted Colony (281.577 Acre) Namely

“Vatika India Next” at Sector- 81, 82, 82A, 83 and 85, Village-Simi,

Shikhopur and Sikandarpur, Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.

It was informed that M/s Vatika Ltd. has submitted reply to the show-cause notice

issued by SEIAA. The Authority was further informed that the project proponent has

been given opportunity to appear in person for personal hearing in the today’s meeting. It

was noticed that the project proponent vide letter 21.04.2016 has intimated that due to

non-availability of their advocate; they are unable to participate and requested to grant 10

days period for appearance in person with the complete details of the case. The Authority

acceded to the request of the applicant and deferred the case with the decision that the

authorized person/advocate shall appear before the Authority in the next meeting of

SEIAA for personal hearing.

*****

1

Minutes of the 91st meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held

on. 06.05.2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.




Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex

project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sec-93, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.



Commercial Complex project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sec-93, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana on a total plot area of 8093.700 sqm (2 Acre). The total built up area shall be

25097.995 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 3 basements + GF + 6 Floors.



generation shall be 70 KLD, which will be treated in the STP of 90 KLD capacity.


today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The License no. 44 of 2010 measuring 128.94 Acres has been granted for

development of plotted colony. The total saleable area of the license is 47.844

Acres (45.884 Acres for plotted development + 2 Acres for commercial). The

commercial pocket earmarked in the approved layout plan is integral part of

plotted colony and the separate application for environmental clearance for the

commercial pocket (2 Acre) cannot be considered as the license has been granted

for plotted colony and not for development of commercial project.

[2] The present proposal of independent commercial complex is also practically not

viable as the commercial area is in continuation of the plotted colony area and for

access to the commercial pocket the project proponent shall have to use land of

plotted area. Therefore the project proponent is required to seek environmental

clearance for plotted colony along with the commercial complex.

[3] The proposal submitted by the project proponent for independent commercial

complex do not conform to the approved layout plan because as per approved

layout plan the project proponent is also required to develop the below mentioned

units in 2 Acres of commercial complex:

(i) Clinic (2 nos. of 250 sqm each)

(ii) ATM (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)

2

(iii) Beauty parlor (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)

(iv) Multipurpose booth (2 nos. of 5x5.5 meter each)

(v) Sub Post Office (1 no. of 40 sqm)

Where as, the project proponent has failed to show the above units in the

commercial pocket.

[4] It is not clear whether the project proponent has undertaken the development of

plotted colony as no photographs of the site has been submitted with application.

The license has been granted in the year 2010 and is now renewed up to

08.06.2016. The project proponent is required to give justified reasons for not

starting development of plotted colony. The Director of the company shall submit

an undertaking with the declaration that the development of the plotted colony has

not been started and shall submit latest photograph of the licensed area.





Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for the construction of Affordable group

housing colony At Sector 111, Village Chauma, Distt. Gurgaon

Haryana by M/s Lotus Realtech Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable group housing colony At Sector 111, Village Chauma, Distt. Gurgaon

Haryana on a total plot area of 20613.64 sqm (5.093 Acre). The total built up area shall

be 51168.22 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of GF + 10 Floors. The project

proposal shall comprise of Residential Building, Commercial Building, Community Hall

and Aanganwadi. The maximum height of the building shall be 38.6 meter. The total



capacity.


today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of



parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent has not given the details of management of storm water

during construction phase.

[2] The project proponent has not mentioned the stack height in the paper submitted

for appraisal.

3

[3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 226 KLD treated water to tankers

for construction purpose. The project proponent is required to justify the same




[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 3 KLD of for D.G set cooling @ 400

KVA. The project proponent has proposed to set up 2x400 KVA of D.G set

whereas in the water balance diagram 3 KLD of treated water has been shown for

cooling. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.




[6] The capacity of OWC and the process involved is not submitted.


decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation within 15 days.

Item No.[3]Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of Super Speciality

Hospital & Medical College in Revenue Estate of village-Palvali &

Badshahpur at Faridabad by Mata Amritanandamayi Math.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Construction of Super

Speciality Hospital & Medical College in Revenue Estate of village-Palvali &

Badshahpur at Faridabad on total plot area is 308957.04 sqm. develop in a phase manner

(195074 sqm for Hospital Block). The built up area is 416368.8 sqmt. The Hospital

project shall comprise of 2 Blocks (1 Teaching + 1 Hospital); 2 Basements + LG + UG +

Service + 12 floors. The Hospital complex shall have 2000 beds. The maximum height of



KLD, which shall be treated in the STP 1800 KLD and ETP 178 KLD capacity. The total

power requirement shall be 15552 KW DG set 16000 KVA which will be supplied by


area (22.31% tree plantation + 4.75% landscaping). The Project Proponent proposed to

construct 27 rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 5.15 TPD, 0.60

TPD bio-medical wastes. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by

installation of OWC (organic waste converter). The area required for OWC will be 3M

x4M. The total parking spaces proposed are 3209 ECS.

The recommendation of SEAC and the proposal of project proponent was

discussed in the today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding drinking

4

water requirement during operation phase and construction phase, non involvement of

Forest land, Storm water management during construction and operation phase, green

belt development plan, Air quality, Water quality, Traffic circulation plan, Solid waste

management plan and Bio-medical waste management plan etc. It was noticed that the

project proponent has not clearly discussed the storm water management during

construction phase. The representative of the project proponent present in the meeting

assured to submit the same. It was also found that 800 nos. of labour shall be deployed by

the project proponent during construction phase and about 72 KLD of waste water shall

be generated. The project proponent is required to provide STP of adequate capacity for

treatment of waste water in the labour camp area. It was noticed that the project

proponent has not earmarked the space for collection and treatment of bio-degradable

waste on the plan. It was noticed that the project proponent has signed MOU with bio-

medical waste services providing agency authorized by HSPCB. The representative of the

project proponent was asked to set up independent facility for treatment of bio-medical

waste in accordance with the MoEF & CC, GoI Notification dated 28 March 2016

prescribing Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules 2016. The project

proponent shall adopt the Plasma Pyrolysis or Gasification Technology for combustion of

bio-medical waste and shall not use incinerator for combustion of bio-medical waste.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to agree with the


the condition as recommended by SEAC and additional condition as given below and

subject to submission of the following information.

[1] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:

(i) They will use treated water from nearby STP for construction purpose.

(ii) They will set up STP of 80 KLD/adequate capacity for treatment of waste

water in the labour camp area.

(iii) They will provide garland drainage system along with sedimentation tank

during its construction phase to regulate storm water during monsoon.

(iv) They will manage its bio-medical waste generated during operational phase

as per the Bio-Medical Waste Management and Handling Rules March

2016.

(v) They will set up organic waste converter for treatment of bio-degradable

waste.

[2] The project proponent shall earmark the space for treatment of bio-degradable

waste on the plan.

[3] The project proponent shall set up independent facility for treatment of bio-

medical waste in accordance with the MoEF & CC, GoI Notification dated 28

March 2016. The project proponent shall adopt the Plasma Pyrolysis or

5

Gasification Technology for combustion of bio-medical waste and shall not use

incinerator for combustion of bio-medical waste.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Building and Construction Project at

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. Manesar by M/s Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.


22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and recommended to exempt this project

proposal from obtaining environmental clearance under EIA Notification dated

14.09.2006. Subject to compliance of sustainable environment management as per

guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI F.No. 19-2/2013-IA.III dated 09.06.2015.




to compliance to guidelines issue by MoEF & CC, GoI dated 09.06.2015 by the project

proponent.

Item No.[5]Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing

Colony “Happy Homes” located in the revenue estate of Village Budena,

Sector-86, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Auric Homes Pvt. Ltd.


and the case was deferred for want of more information as under:

[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of authenticated document establishing

that the construction activity was undertaken after the expiry of 45 days of

recommendation of SEAC.




proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given detail of

process involved for use of empty cement bags for road making. It was noticed that the

process involved shredding of cement bag which will create air pollution and the project

proponent shall adopt APCM to control the same. The project proponent also submitted

copy of temporary power connection bill receipt dated 30.09.2015 which shows the

construction was started by the project proponent after the expiry of 45 days from the

recommendation of SEAC for environment clearance (03.03.2015).

In view of the above discussions the Authority agreed that the project proposal

qualifies for deemed clearance as per sub para (iii) of para 8 of EIA Notification dated

14.09.2006 and decided to accept the request of project proponent of deemed clearance of

their project subject to strict compliance of the conditions as impose by SEAC in their

recommendation dated 03.03.2015.

6


located at Sector-2, Sohna, Haryana by M/s Metro Techno Build Pvt.

Ltd.


and the case was defer to the next meeting with the decision that the project proponent

shall submit the following information within 15 days.







[3] The project proponent shall give the details of area required for storage of STP

sludge.


proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given details of

provision made for preservation of top soil, calculation of drinking water for labour and

detail of area required for storage STP sludge.

In view of the above the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of


in practice.


Project located at Village Dhunela, Sector-34, Sohna, District-

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s CHD Develpers Ltd.










[3] The project proponent has proposed to use drip irrigation for horticulture and

landscaping and has proposed to use 6 lit/sqm of treated water. The project

7

proponent is required to justify the use of 6 lit/sqm of treated water with




[5] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking on the non-judicial stamp paper

declaring that:

(i) They will not discharge treated/untreated waste water in the nallah passing

through the project area.

(ii) The natural flow of nallah shall not be obstructed.


proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given details of

provision made for preservation of top soil, calculation of drinking water for labour,

calculation of requirement of water for landscaping; an undertaking not to discharge any

waste water in the nallah and not to obstruct the natural flow nallah. It was observed that

the project proponent has given detail of process involved for use of empty cement bags

for road making. It was noticed that the process involved shredding of cement bag which

will create air pollution and the project proponent shall adopt APCM to control the same.



in practice and an additional condition as under:

[1] The project proponent shall adopt APCM to control the emissions during

shredding process of empty cement bags.


“MICASA” at Sector 68 (HD), Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Pareena Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.




[1] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of treated water for DG set

cooling of 3000 KVA capacity (power backup only). The project proponent is

required to explain the same with proper justification and calculation.






proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has now rectified

8

the quantum of use of treated water for cooling purpose and has submitted revised water

balance diagram. The information submitted by the project proponent was found

complete



in practice.

****

1

Minutes of the 92nd

meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 15th

& 16th

June 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS

(Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana,

Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification

dated 14.9.2006.




On 15th

June 2016

Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable group housing

colony At Sector 111, Village Chauma, Distt. Gurgaon Haryana by M/s

Lotus Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 91st meeting of SEIAA held on 06.05.2016

and the case was deferred for want of more information as under:

[1] The project proponent has not given the details of management of storm water


[2] The project proponent has not mentioned the stack height in the paper submitted

for appraisal.






[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 3 KLD of for D.G set cooling @ 400

KVA. The project proponent has proposed to set up 2x400 KVA of D.G set

whereas in the water balance diagram 3 KLD of treated water has been shown for

cooling. The project proponent is required to clarify the same.




[6] The capacity of OWC and the process involved is not submitted.


proponent was considered. It was observed that the project proponent has given detail of

storm water management during construction phase; impact of movement of vehicles

carrying treated water on the AAQ and its mitigation measures; capacity of OWC for

treatment of bio-degradable waste; calculation of drinking water, its source, waste water

generation and its treatment in the labour camp area during construction and use of 3

KLD of treated water for DG set cooling but fail to show the location of cooling tower in

2

the project area. It was decided that the project proponent should earmark the location of

cooling tower in the plan. It was also decided that the project proponent may be advised

to adopt Air Cooling device i.e. Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water.



the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission plan showing location of cooling

tower. The project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.

Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of “IT OFFICE COMPLEX”

Project at 12/6, Village Sarai Khwaja, Faridabad, Haryana (Khasra No.

26//18/2/2/1, 18/2/2/2, 19/1, 19/2, 22/1, 23/1/1, 23/1/2) by M/s SFG

Exports (India) Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has referred the matter to the SEIAA for taking up the case with

MoEF, GoI as Hon’ble NGT has quashed the operation of OM dated 12.12.2012 and

27.06.2013 and no policy/advice has been received from MoEF, GoI to deal with the

violation cases. It was also noticed that the project proposal is for construction of IT

office complex and MOEF & CC, GOI vide draft notification dated 29.04.2016 has

proposed to exempt construction of IT Park subject to the compliance of sustainable

environment management and environmental conditions as stated in appendix-XIII of the

draft notification. The final notification is yet to come.

It was informed that this office has already requested MoEF &CC, GoI to send

necessary guidelines to deal with the violation cases but till date no information has been

received. Accordingly, it was decided to keep the case in abeyance till some information

regarding exemption or to deal with the violation cases is finalized by MOEF & CC,

GOI.

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony (13.168 acres) in

the revenue estate of village Nakhdola, Sector -81, Gurgaon , Haryana

by M/S Emaar MGF Land Limited.



Housing colony (13.168 acres) in the revenue estate of village Nakhdola, Sector -81,

Gurgaon , Haryana on a total plot area of 53289 sqm The total built up area shall be

201940.802 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 5 Residential Towers + GF +

29 Floors. The project proposal shall comprise of Community Building, Convenient

Shopping and Nursery School. The project proposal shall comprise of 740 no. of DU.



generation shall be 427 KLD, which will be treated in the 2 STPS of 450 KLD & 85

KLD capacities.

3





parking plan, traffic circulation etc.

It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent has not discussed the details of management of storm

water/rain water harvesting during construction phase.

[2] The project proponent has proposed to use 30 KLD of treated water for cooling of

8 no. of DG sets. The project proponent should give the justification the same with

calculation and also show the location of cooling tower. It was also decided that

the project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.

Radiator/Cooling Coil in order to save the water.

[3] The height of the building is 95.2 meter and the project proponent is required to

furnish the structural stability certificate.

[4] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting

up of STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.

[5] The project proponent has not submitted the photograph of the site showing status

of construction accordingly it was decided that a team comprising of Sh. Hitender

Singh, Member SEAC and Sh. S.K.Mishra, Member SEAC shall inspect the site

and submit the report directly to the Authority regarding status of construction if

any within 30 days.



raised observation within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC and Sh.

S.K.Mishra, Member SEAC may be requested to inspect the site and submit the report

directly to the Authority regarding status of construction if any within 30 days period.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Plotted

Colony” project located at Village Naurangpur, Sector-78 & 79,

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Revital Reality Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Residential Plotted

Colony” project located at Village Naurangpur, Sector-78 & 79, Gurgaon, Haryana on

total plot area is 415612.154 sqm (102.70 Acre). The built up area shall be 627280.793

sqmt. The proposed project shall have Residential Apartments, EWS Apartments,

Commercial Area, Nursing Homes, Nursery School, Primary School, Clinic and Beauty

Parlor. The Plotted area shall have 793 no. of Plots (435 Residential Plots + 159 EWS

Plots + 199 NPNL units). The total water requirement shall be 1958 KLD. The fresh


4

which will be treated in the STP of 1925 KLD capacity. The total power requirement

shall be 11500 KVA 2 DG sets of 630 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The

Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 24.33% of project area

(19438.68 sqm tree plantation + 57510.631 avenue plantation + 20126.62 sqm lawn

area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 46 rain water harvesting pits. The

solid waste generation will be 9250 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in

the project area by adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed

are 663 ECS.







NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.




[2] The project proponent shall submit the Stack Height.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 303 KLD of treated water for

horticulture. The project proponent should adopt sprinklers for watering purposes

and accordingly justify the use of 303 KLD of treated water and also submit

revised water balance diagram.






[5] In the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan under Stabilization measures the

project proponent has included Temporary Seeding, Permanent Seeding and

Mulching. The project proponent is required to explain in detail with respect to the

proposal under consideration.



the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the above asked information

within 15 days.

5


Housing at Village Harsaru, Sector-88A & 89A, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Alton Buildtech India Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing at Village Harsaru, Sector-88A & 89A, Gurgaon, Haryana on

a total plot area of 20645.01 sqm (5.1015 Acres). The total built up area shall be

53195.15 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 07 Towers consisting of Basement

Tower A1, Tower A2, Tower A3, Tower A4 (S+12 floors), Tower B1 & B2 (GF + 14

Floors), Commercial (GF+3 floors). The proposed project shall have Community Hall,

Aanganwadi cum Creche and 1790 Dwelling Units. The total Dwelling units shall be

804. The maximum height of the building shall be 44.7 meter. The total water



capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3080.8 KW which will be supplied by

DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4399.77 sqm

(21.31%) of project area (1206 sqm tree plantation + 676 sqm avenue plantation +

2517.77 sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to construct 6 rain water



converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 838 ECS for two wheelers and 336

ECS for four wheelers.


discussions were held regarding existence of gas pipe line, water requirement, quality of





[1] The project proponent shall submit detail break up of use of 25 KLD of water


[2] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management


[3] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level

of tallest building.

[4] The project proponent has proposed the development in 3 pockets therefore the

project proponent shall justify the power supply in all the 3 pockets.


up of STPs in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan.

6






[7] The project proponent is required to submit the exact quantum of spent oil

generation as different figures have been given on page no. 41 & 42 of the

document.



the condition as usual subject to the submission of satisfactory information as asked

above within 15 days.

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Cum

Commercial Complex” at Sector-79, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s

Robust Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.



“Residential Cum Commercial Complex” at Sector-79, Faridabad, Haryana on a total plot

area of 43133.351 sqm (10.65 Acre). The total built up area shall be 95202.63 sqm. The

proposed Project shall comprise of 3 Towers + 2 Basements + GF + 18 Floors. The

proposed project shall have Shops, Offices and Dwelling Units. The maximum height of

the building shall be 65.4 meter. The total water requirement shall be 393 KLD. The fresh


which will be treated in the STP of 320 KLD capacity.



[1] The licenses submitted by the project proponent are not valid.

[2] The project proponent shall justify the use of 4 KLD of water for Tyre washing.

[3] The project proponent shall submit detailed break up of 20 KLD of water

proposed to be used during construction phase.

[4] The project proponent shall submit the water balance diagram during monsoon

period.

[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 6 litre/sqmt of treated water for

irrigation/horticulture purposes. The project proponent shall give the proper

justification.



7





Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Colony project

“The Melia” located at Village Mohammadpur Gujjar, Sector-35,

Sohna Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DSS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.



Housing Colony project “The Melia” located at Village Mohammadpur Gujjar, Sector-

35, Sohna Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana on a total plot area of 70455.77 sqm (17.41 Acre). The

total built up area shall be 152000 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 11

Residential Towers (Stilt + 14 floors), EWS Tower (Stilt + 13 floors). The proposed

project shall have Community Building, Shopping, Primary School, Nursery School, 917

Main Units, 169 EWS Units and 94 Service Units. The maximum height of the building

shall be 44.9 meter. The total water requirement shall be 863 KLD. The fresh water


be treated in the STP of 800 KLD capacity.



[1] The project proponent on 31.05.2015 uploaded online application with MOEF &

CC, GOI. The EAC of MOEF & CC, GOI on 19.07.2015 approved the TOR for

preparation of EIA/EMP whereas the project proponent collected the data during

March 2015 to May 2015 i.e. prior to approval of TOR and even submission of

application. The study carried out before submission of application by the project

proponent is not in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the notification.



[3] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction

phase with detailed break up.










8

[7] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for DG set Cooling but

the location of cooling tower has not been shown. The project proponent is

required of show the cooling tower on the plan. The project proponent is advised

to adopt Air Cooling Technology i.e. Radiator/ cooling coil in order to save the

water.





Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony at

Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s JMK

Holdings Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Colony at Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana on a total plot area of 36421.65sqm (9.0 Acre). The total built up area shall be

94066.92 sqm. The proposed Project shall comprise of 13 Towers (GF + 13 floors). The

proposed project shall have retail area, Community Hall and Anganwadi. The maximum



be 894 KLD, which will be treated in the 3 STPs of 1072 KLD (1061 KLD + 11 KLD)

capacity.



[1] The project proponent has mentioned the depth of ground water table at 4 meter.

The project proponent is required to submit authenticated proof of some

government agency/CGWB.

[2] No environmental safe guards have been suggested in recommendations for the

safety / protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of

ground water table at 4 meter.



[4] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction

phase with detailed break up.





9






[8] The project proponent shall earmark the space reserved for setting up of OWC for

treatment of Bio-degradable waste in the project area.

[9] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of water for horticulture. The

project proponent is required to justify the same with proper calculations.





Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony in the revenue estate

of Village-Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon by M/s AMB Infraventures

Pvt. Ltd.



Commercial Colony in the revenue estate of Village-Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon

Haryana total plot area is 12848.748 sqm (3.175 Acre). The built up area shall be

40377.076 sqmt. The proposed project shall have one commercial building consisting of

2 Basements + GF + 5 floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 32.9 meter.

The total water requirement shall be 517 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 299

KLD. The waste water generation shall be 272 KLD which will be treated in the STP of

300 KLD capacity. The total power requirement shall be 5370 KW which will be


25.07% (3216.39 sqm) of project area. The Project Proponent proposed to construct 4

rain water harvesting pits. The solid waste generation will be 2133 kg/day. The bio-










10








[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 218 KLD of treated water for cooling

purposes. The project proponent is required to justify the same with calculations

and also should show the location of cooling tower on the plan. It was also decided

that the project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.







Housing Colony” project at Sector-102, Village Dhankot, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd.



“Affordable Group Housing Colony” project at Village Dhankot, Gurgaon, Haryana on a

total plot area of 20234.25 sqm (5.0 Acres). The total built up area shall be 53420.4 sqm.

The proposed Project shall comprise of 08 Towers + GF + 12 floors. The proposed

project shall have Commercial, Community Hall and Aanganwadi cum Creche and 761

no. of Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be 38.8 meter. The total



capacity. The total power requirement shall be 4.6 MVA which will be supplied by

DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 4088.66 sqm

(20.21%) of project area (1411.52 sqm green belt + 312.55 sqm tree plantation + 593.84

sqm avenue plantation + 1770.74 sqm lawn area). The Project Proponent proposed to


The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by installation of OWC

(organic waste converter). The total parking spaces proposed are 487 ECS.


discussions were held regarding gas pipe line, water requirement, quality of water, green


11



for supply of water, NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli

Notification and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.


[1] The project proponent has proposed the deployment of 150 number of labourer

and has proposed the generation of 23 kg/day of solid waste. The project

proponent is required to justify the same with proper calculation.


horticulture/gardening. The project proponent is required to justify the same with

proper calculation.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 5 KLD of water as miscellaneous use

but failed to submit the details of the same. The project proponent is required to

justify the same.

[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 4 KLD of water for curing purposes.

The project proponent is required to justify the same.

[5] The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the

public sewer. The project proponent is required to ensure the existence of public

sewer line, its carrying capacity and assurance of the competent body for

discharge of treated water in public sewer.





Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted

Colony measuring 104.54375 acres at Village Riwazpur, Bhupani and

Tikawali, Sector 88 & 89, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Fantabulous

Town Planners Pvt. Ltd.



Residential Plotted Colony measuring 104.54375 acres at Village Riwazpur, Bhupani and

Tikawali, Sector 88 & 89, Faridabad, Haryana total plot area is 406000.87 sqm (100.325

Acre). The built up area shall be 281445.16 sqmt. The proposed project shall have

Residential Plots (General, EWS and NPNL), Nursery & Primary School, Nursing Home,

Commercial Complex, Religious Centre and Community Centre. The maximum height of

the building shall be 13 meter. The total water requirement shall be 1858 KLD. The fresh


which will be treated in the 3 STPs of 170 KLD, 450 KLD & 1350 KLD capacities. The

project proponent has also proposed to set up ETP of 15 KLD capacity for treatment of

12

waste water proposed to be generated from Nursing Home. The total power requirement

shall be 20827.56 KVA which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project Proponent has

proposed to develop green belt on 30% (113542.65 sqm) of project area. The Project


will be 6163 kg/day. The bio-degradable waste will be treated in the project area by

adopting appropriate technology. The total parking spaces proposed are 433 ECS.



development plan, Ambient Air Quality, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic


for supply of water and NOC from AAI regarding height clearance.






[3] The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the

public sewer. The project proponent is required to ensure the existence of public

sewer line, its carrying capacity and assurance of the competent body for

discharge of treated water in public sewer.

[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 22 KLD of treated water for cooling

purposes. The project proponent is required to justify the same with calculations

and also should show the location of cooling tower on the plan. It was also decided

that the project proponent may be advised to adopt Air Cooling device i.e.






Item No.[12] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the

Environmental Clearance letter granted by SEIAA under EIA

Notification dated 14.09.2006; for development of Residential Plotted

Colony (281.577 Acre) Namely “Vatika India Next” at Sector- 81, 82,

82A, 83 and 85, Village-Simi, Shikhopur and Sikandarpur, Gurgaon

by M/s Vatika Limited.

The Authority observed that on the receipt of the complaint from Shri Prashant

Jhangra R/O Gurgaon reporting violation of the imposed conditions; a committee was

constituted to visit the site and submit its report to SEIAA for taking further action. The

SEIAA on the basis of the report of committee issued show-cause notice to M/s Vatika

Limited vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2016/128 dated 05.03.2016. M/s Vatika Limited on

13

28.03.2016 submitted the reply. It was decided to grant personal hearing to M/s Vatika

Limited to defend the allegations raised in the complaint.

The authorized representative of M/s Vatika Limited Sh. Aashish Chopra

Advocate appeared before the Authority for hearing to defend the case regarding

violation of imposed conditions of the environment clearance letter as pointed out in the

show-cause notice. The representative of the project proponent contended that they have

not violated the conditions of EC letter as reported in the show-cause notice and gave

explanation as under:

1. As regard not obtaining Consent for Establish from HSPCB before the start of

construction the representative of the project proponent argued that the Hon’ble

Delhi High Court in a case has passed judgment that Consent for Establish in case

of Residential Project is not required from PCB under Air and Water Act and

assured the Authority to submit the copy of judgment for reference and decision

thereof. He further informed that the Consent for Establish is linked with the

environmental clearance and Consent for Establish is granted only after

submission of environment clearance letter.

2. As regard start of construction before obtaining prior environmental clearance the

representative of the project proponent described in detail the date of submission

of application for environment clearance for the residential plotted colony, date of

submission of revised application due to addition of area, date of recommendation

of SEAC and date of decision conveyed to them by the SEIAA; keeping in view

the provision of EIA Notification contained in para 8 (iii) and (iv). The

representative of the project proponent further asserted that their revised

application for environmental clearance was finally recommended by SEAC in the

54th

meeting held on 23, 24.02.2011 and no decision was conveyed to them by the

SEIAA in 45 days. The representative of the project proponent categorically

contended that their project proposal qualified for deemed clearance in terms of

para 8 (iii) of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 as no decision was conveyed by

the SEIAA to them in 45 days.

3. As regards clearance from the Fire Department the project proponent submitted

copy of NOC dated 28.08.2015 issued by the Fire Department.

4. As regards assurance of power supply the project proponent submitted copy of

assurance dated 23.06.2010 issued by DHBVN.

5. As regards maintenance of green belt at least 43.05% for the entire township

project the representative of the project proponent inform that in the show cause

notice the green area of Group Housing component has been indicated whereas the

condition of maintenance of green belt of 43.05% has been imposed in the

clearance letter for the entire township project. The environmentally cleared

14

project is still under development and will take more time for

completion/operation. The representative of the project proponent argued that the

achievement of 43.05% of green belt is possible only after the completion of entire

project and assured the Authority to achieve the same during the operational phase

as the condition imposed relates to operational phase.

In view of the above discussions the representative of the project proponent was

asked to submit point wise written statement as discussed during hearing. The

representative of the project proponent agreed to submit the same. It was decided to

examine the written statement and to take up the matter in the meeting of Authority for

taking final decision.

Item No.[13] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the


Notification dated 14.09.2006; for construction of “ATHARVA” Group

Housing project at sector-109, Village-Panwala, Khusrupur, Gurgaon

by M/s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The Authority observed that on the receipt of the complaint from Atharva Owners

Welfare Association reporting violation of the imposed conditions; a committee was

constituted to visit the site and submit its report to SEIAA for taking further action. The

SEIAA on the basis of the report of committee issued show-cause notice to M/s Raheja

Developers Pvt. Ltd vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2016/129 dated 05.03.2016. M/s Raheja

Developers Pvt. Ltd on 26.04.2016 submitted the reply. It was decided to grant personal

hearing to /s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd. to defend the allegations raised in the

complaint. The authorized representative of /s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd. will be heard

in the meeting.

The authorized representative of M/s Raheja Developer Sh. Sajal Gupta appeared

before the Authority for hearing to defend the case regarding violation of imposed

conditions of the environment clearance letter as pointed out in the show-cause notice.

The representative of the project proponent contended that they have not violated the

conditions of EC letter as reported in the show-cause notice and gave explanation as

under:

1. The representative of the project proponent intimated that the environment

clearance was granted for built up area of 157918.34 sqm and the existing built up

area is within the permissible norms as per the clearance letter and the built up

area of 173395.065 sqm shall be achieved after addition of 0.8 acre of additional

licensed area for which application for environmental clearance has been

submitted.

2. As regards maintenance of 30% project area under green cover the representative

of the project proponent clarified that now they have covered 30% of the project

area for which a plan has already been submitted. The representative of the project

15

proponent agreed that earlier the green belt was less than 30% project area but

now they have achieved the same.

3. As regards NOC from the Fire Department the representative of the project

proponent intimated that the issuance of NOC is in advance stage with the

concerned departments and assured to submit the same within week.

Besides discussion of above points of show-cause notice the representative of the

project proponent was asked to clarify about the violation of EIA Notification dated

14.09.2006 as they have started the construction on additional licensed area of 0.8 acre

without obtaining prior environment clearance. The representative of the project

proponent informed that they have now leveled the area of additional land but kept silent

regarding the issue of starting construction without obtaining prior environment

clearance. The representative further stated that they have already submitted application

for prior environmental clearance for the expansion of the project.

In view of the above discussions the representative of the project proponent was

asked to submit point wise written statement as discussed during hearing. The

representative of the project proponent agreed to submit the same. It was decided to

examine the written statement and to take up the matter in the meeting of Authority for

taking final decision.

Additional Agenda 16th

June 2016

The Chairman granted the permission to take up the following Mining cases as

recommended by SEAC in the meeting as an additional Agenda Items.

Item No.[14]Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand

Minor Mineral, at Kiratpur Block/PKL B-5 & 6 at villages Kiratpur

and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka & District-Panchkula, State Haryana area

13.40 Ha by M/s Barwala Royalty Company.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Barwala

Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Village-

Kiratpur and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka & District-Panchkula, State Haryana over an area of

13.40 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.





Kiratpur and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka & District-Panchkula. The project proponent on

02.02.2016 uploaded online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan under

category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was

noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine lease

16

exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this project as

category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Kiratpur and Paploha, Tehsil-Kalka &

District-Panchkula


Production capacity

Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral

at Kiratpur Block B5 & 6, 13.40 Ha

603000 TPA @ 67 Trips/day (30 Ton/Trip)

4. Project Cost 72 Lakhs


Dust suppression 5 KLD

Plantation 5.5 KLD

Drinking 2.5 KLD


Budget

7 lakh



603000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2

meter above water table which ever comes first.

The Bench mRL will be 490-501 for five years.


area

Block Latitude Longitude

Kiratpur

30°50'51.9"N 76°51 '02.8"E

30°50'52.3"N 76°53 ’3.1"E

Paploha 30°50'44.7"N 76°53 '41.8"E

30°51'6.2"N 76°54 '2.1"E



I Yr. 1950 Trees

II Yr. 1950 Tree

III Yr. 1950 Tree

IV Yr. 1950 Tree

V Yr. 1950 Tree

11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light




the additional condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:

[1] The project proponent shall strictly adhere to the Sustainable Sand Mining

Management guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI on 15.03.2016 and shall

ensure the compliance of the standard environmental conditions prescribed for the

sand mining in the said guidelines; in addition to the conditions imposed in the

environment clearance letter.

17

Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand

Minor Mineral, “Gorakhnath Block B-1 &2” at Village-Gorakhnath,

Tehsil & District-Panchkula, State Haryana area 12.94 Ha by M/s Shri

Nasib Singh.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Shri Nasib

Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, “Gorakhnath Block B-1

&2” at Village-Gorakhnath, Tehsil & District-Panchkula, State Haryana over an area of

12.94 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.



period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent

(LOI) dated 09.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 12.94 Ha having

Village-Gorakhnath, Tehsil & District-Panchkula. The project proponent uploaded online

application on 01.02.2016 along with copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-2.

The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It was noticed that The






2. Location of Project Village-Gorakhnath, Tehsil & District-Panchkula


Production capacity


at “Gorakhnath Block B-1 &2”, 12.94 ha.

582300 TPA @65 Trips/day (30 Ton/Trip)




Plantation 9 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD


Budget

7 lakh



582300 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2


The Bench mRL will be 401-392 & 421-419 for

five years.


area


Gorakhnath N 30O 53’35.8”

To

N 30O 53’44.2”

E76O 48’40.7”

To

E76O 48’56.3”

18



I Yr. 1880 Trees

II Yr. 1880 Trees

III Yr. 1880 Trees

IV Yr. 1880 Trees

V Yr. 1880 Trees











Item No.[16]Environmental Clearance for proposed River Bed Minor Mineral

Mining project “Mandlai 1 Block/PKL B 21” Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-

Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana area 13.20 Ha by M/s Shri

Ranbir Singh S/O Sh. Mohinder Singh,

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Shri Ranbir

Singh S/O Sh. Mohinder Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral,

“Mandlai 1 Block/PKL B 21” at Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-

Panchkula, Haryana over an area of 13.20 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.





Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana. The project

proponent uploaded online application on 18.02.2016 along with copy of approved


5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no

other mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC

appraised this project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Mandlai, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-

Panchkula, Haryana


Production capacity


“Mandlai 1 Block/PKL B 21” 13.20 ha.

5,94,000 TPA @66 Trips/day (30 Ton/Trip)

19


5. Water Requirement & Source 13.11 KLD through Tankers

Dust suppression 5.45 KLD

Plantation 4.40 KLD

Drinking 3.26 KLD


Budget

7 lakh



5,94,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or

2 meter above water table which ever comes first.

The Bench mRL will be 347-352 for five years.


area


Sangrel

Nadi

N 30O 34’05.9”

To

N 30O 34’26.8”

E77O 06’27.4”

To

E77O 06’27.9”



I Yr. 1920 Trees

II Yr. 1920 Trees

III Yr. 1920 Trees

IV Yr. 1920 Trees

V Yr. 1920 Trees











Item No.[17]Environmental Clearance for “Bir Tapu YNR B-07 Sand Mine (Minor

Mineral)” at Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna Nagar,

Haryana of area 14.45 Ha by M/s Routes & Journeys through Sh.

Sanjay Kumar.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Routes

& Journeys through Sh. Sanjay Kumar for Mining of Sand Mine (Minor Mineral)” at

Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna Nagar, Haryana, over an area of 14.45

Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.




20


Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent

uploaded online application on 17.03.2016 along with copy of approved Mining Plan

under category B-2. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. It

was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other mine

lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised this

project as category B-2. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Birtapu, Tehsil-Jagadri, District-Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana


Production capacity


“Bir Tapu YNR B-07 ” 14.45 Ha.

6, 15, 000 TPA @82 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)

4. Project Cost 19 Crore



Plantation 3.0 KLD

Drinking 2.0 KLD


Budget

64 lakh



6, 15, 000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or


The alivation range will be 269 amsl to 270 amsl.


area

Co-ordinates Latitudes Longitudes

Lease area N 30O 06’46”

To

N 30O 06’56”

E77O 23’40”

To

E77O 24’06”



I Yr. 400 Trees

II Yr. 400 Trees

III Yr. 400 Trees

IV Yr. 400 Trees

V Yr. 400 Trees








21




Item No.[18]Environmental Clearance for “Extraction of Dolomite and Beryte,

along with associated minor mineral (Road Metal & Masonry)” at

Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District, Mahendergarh, Haryana

of area 4.80 Ha by M/s Xandy Mines & Minerals,

The SEAC has recommended the case for Environment Clearance to M/s Xandy

Mines & Minerals for “Extraction of Dolomite and Beryte, along with associated minor

mineral (Road Metal & Masonry)” at Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District,

Mahendergarh, Haryana of area 4.80 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.


meeting. It was observed that the mine lease area is less than 5 Ha and as such the

environmental clearance in this case is to be granted by DEIAA/DEAC in view of

amendment to the Notification dated 15.01.2016. It was found that MoEF & CC, GoI vide

letter no. Z-11013/8/2016-IA.II (M) dated 15.03.2016 has clarified that where SEAC has

recommended the cases for environmental clearance such cases are to be processed at the

level of SEIAA for grant of environmental clearance. Accordingly it was decided to take

up the case as recommended by SEAC. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology

Department has granted lease for a period of 07 years subject to the terms and conditions

as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 28.08.2014. The lease has been granted for an

area of 4.80 Ha having Khasra no. 103, 108 & 109 Village-Dhonkhera. The project

proponent on 30.03.2016 submitted online application along with copy of approved


5 years. It was noticed that The Mines & Geology, Department has clarified that no other

mine lease exists within 500 meter radius of this mine accordingly the SEAC appraised




2. Location of Project Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District,

Mahendergarh, Haryana


Production capacity

“Extraction of Dolomite and Beryte, along with

associated minor mineral (Road Metal & Masonry)”

at Village-Dhonkhera, Tehsil-Narnaul, District,

Mahendergarh, Haryana Khasra no. 103, 108 & 109

over an area of 4.80 Ha

Dolomite & Beryte: 1,25,000 MT

R.M. & M.S: 2,00,000 MT

Total: 3,25,000 TPA


22



Plantation 1 KLD

Drinking 1 KLD


Budget

7.6 lakh




First 364 to 358 3,21,650 MT

Second 364 to 352 3,25,250 MT

Third 370 to 352 3,25,500 MT

Fourth 370 to 352 3,25,100 MT

Fifth 352 to 346 3,25,100 MT



I Yr. 200 Trees

II Yr. 200 Trees

III Yr. 200 Trees

IV Yr. 200 Trees

V Yr. 200 Trees




Diesel Operated Pump, Explosive Van, Water

sprinkler, Rear dumpers.



the usual conditions as recommended by SEAC.

Item No.[19]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Balu/Sand over an area of

35.00 Ha' in Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production Capacity- I 2,67

,200 Tons per Tehsil- Ganaur, District Sonipat (HR) by M/s Ultimate

Group.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s

Ultimate Group for Mining of Balu/Sand, at Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production

Capacity- I 2, 67, 200 Tons per year Tehsil- Ganaur, District Sonipat (HR) over an area

of 35.00 Ha' by imposing stipulations stated therein.


meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent submitted online application with

MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI in its 35th

meeting held on 24 to 26 June 2015 approved the TOR subject to submission of revised

Form-I, PFR and details of the court cases. The project proponent on 30.07.2015

submitted the desired information accordingly the MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter dated

19.08.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project proponent.

Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 18.04.2016 in view of the amendment to

23

the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted EIA/EMP on

20.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for

a period of 08 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent

(LOI) dated 21.04.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 35.00 Ha (23.60 Ha in

Gyaspur/Rasulpur, River Bed Block +11.40 Ha in Gyaspur outside River Bed Block)

Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production Capacity- I 2,67 ,200 Tons per Tehsil- Ganaur,

District Sonipat (HR). The land use of 11.40 Ha in Gyaspur outside riverbed is

agriculture land as per sustainable sand mining management guidelines issued by MoEF,

GoI the lease should be of sand mining from agriculture field or river. In same lease both

type of area should not be included where as in the space the Mines and Geology

Department Haryana has granted lease for 35 Ha to the project proponent vide LOI dated

20.04.2016. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan dated

22.07.2015. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 16.03.2016. The SEAC has

appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.



2. Location of Project Village- Gyaspur- Rasulpur' Production Capacity-

I2,67 ,200 Tons per Tehsil- Ganaur, District

Sonipat (HR)


Production capacity

Mining of Balu/Sand, at Village- Gyaspur-

Rasulpur' 35.00 Ha.

12,67,200 MT/year @142 Trips/day (169

Ton/Trip)

4. Project Cost 8.50 Crore



Plantation 7 KLD

Drinking 2KLD


Budget

21.10 lakh

7. CSR Activates Budget 20 Lakh per anum

8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 12,

67,200 MT/year. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl

or 2 meter above water table which ever comes first

in the riverbed mining.


area


River bed N 29O 05’50”

To

N 29O 06’27”

E77O 07’50”

To

E77O 08’14”

Outside

River bed

N 29O 05’59”

To

N 29O 06’11”

E77O 06’43”

To

E77O 06’56”

24



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees

11. Machinery required Excavator, JCB, Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light










Item No.[20]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand

(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Bailgarh South Block/YNR B2” over

an area of 28.00 Ha. Falling in Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Mubarikpur Royalty

Company.


Mubarikpur Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals)

Mines namely “Bailgarh South Block/YNR B2” Falling in Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-

Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 28.00 Ha by imposing

stipulations stated therein.


meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent on 10.07.2015 submitted online

application with MoEF & CC, GoI for environmental clearance. The EAC of MoEF, GoI

in its meeting held on 28.08.2015 approved the TOR. The MoEF & CC, GoI vide letter

dated 07.09.2015 communicated the TOR for preparation of EIA/EMP to the project

proponent. Thereafter the case was transferred to SEIAA on 21.04.2016 in view of the

amendment to the EIA Notification dated 15.01.2016. The project proponent submitted

EIA/EMP on 25.04.2016. It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has

granted lease for a period of 09 years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in

Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 28.00

Ha “Bailgarh South Block/YNR B2 at Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District

Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan

dated 23.02.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 09.03.2016. The

25

SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been

obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Bailgarh, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District

Yamuna Nagar, Haryana


Production capacity

Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor

Minerals) Mines namely “Bailgarh South

Block/YNR B2” over an area of 28.00 Ha.

13,00,000 TPA @173 Trips/day (25 MT)




Plantation 15 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD


Budget

34 lakh






area

Co-ordinator Latitudes Longitudes

Lease area N 30O 13’29.01”

N 30O 13’10.29”

N 30O 12’41.01”

E77O 30’34.59”

E77O 30’24.22”

E77O 30’17.97”



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees











26


(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22”

over an area of 13.59 Ha. Falling in Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-

Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Delhi Royalty

Company.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Delhi

Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines

namely “Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22” falling in Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-

Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 13.59 Ha. by imposing












Ha “Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22” at Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining

plan dated 23.02.2016. The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 11.03.2016. The


obtained. It was noticed that the lease area is less than 25 Ha. The EAC of MoEF & CC,

GoI and SEAC have appraised this project under category B-1 requiring approval of TOR,

Public Consultation as per procedure prevalent at that time. The MoEF &CC, GoI on

15.01.2016 amended the Notification and as per amended Notification this project activity

now falls under caterogy B-2.



2. Location of Project Village-Kohliwala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District



Production capacity

“Kohliwala Block/YNR B-21 & 22”


2,50,000 TPA @33 Trips/day (25 MT)


27



Plantation 10 KLD

Drinking 1 KLD


Budget

24 lakh



2,50,000 TPA. The ultimate pit limit is 3 m bgl or 2



area


Kohliwala

Block/YNR

B-21

N 30O 15’34.8”

N 30O 15’42.1”

N 30O 15’38.2”

N 30O 15’34.6”

E77O 30’08.1”

E77O 30’17.0”

E77O 30’19.8”

E77O 30’13.0”

Kohliwala

Block/YNR

B-22

N 30O 15’32.0”

N 30O 15’26.3”

N 30O 15’18.2”

N 30O 15’26.5”

E77O 30’25.4”

E77O 30’30.3”

E77O 30’37.0”

E77O 30’25.3”



I Yr. 400 Trees

II Yr. 400 Trees

III Yr. 400 Trees

IV Yr. 400 Trees

V Yr. 400 Trees




recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project as category B-

2 in view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 by imposing the additional

condition as under along with the usual conditions recommended by SEAC:







(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20” over

an area of 9.95 Ha. Falling in Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-

Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Ganga

Yamuna Mining Co.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Ganga

Yamuna Mining Co. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines

namely “Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20” falling in Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-

28

Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 9.95 Ha by imposing











Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 9.95 Ha

“Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20”at Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District











2. Location of Project Village-Bhood Majra, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District



Production capacity

“Bhood Majra Block/YNR B-20”


2,00,000 TPA @27 Trips/day (25 MT)




Plantation 10 KLD

Drinking 1 KLD


Budget

24 lakh





29


area


of the lease

area

N 30O 14’50”

To

N 30O 15’06”

E77O 28’38.5”

To

E77O 28’51”



I Yr. 400 Trees

II Yr. 400 Trees

III Yr. 400 Trees

IV Yr. 400 Trees

V Yr. 400 Trees













(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Devdhar Block/YNR B-24” over an

area of 31.87 Ha. Falling in Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Northern Royalty Company,

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Northern

Royalty Company for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines

namely “Devdhar Block/YNR B-24” falling in Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 31.87 Ha by imposing stipulations

stated therein.










30


Ha “Devdhar Block/YNR B-24” at Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District




obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Devdhar, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District



Production capacity

“Devdhar Block/YNR B-24”


5,10,000 TPA @77 Trips/day (25 MT)




Plantation 12 KLD

Drinking 2 KLD


Budget

29 lakh






area


of the lease

area

N 30O 15’03.0”

N 30O 15’02.7”

N 30O 14’49.6”

N 30O 14’49.9”

E77O 28’06.0”

E77O 28’31.3”

E77O 28’25.2”

E77O 28’57.7”



I Yr. 480 Trees

II Yr. 480 Trees

III Yr. 480 Trees

IV Yr. 480 Trees

V Yr. 480 Trees








31





(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Pobari Block/YNR B-11” over an area

of 23.05 Ha. Falling in Village-Pobari, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana by M/s Devlopment Strategies India Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s

Devlopment Strategies India Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor

Minerals) Mines namely “Pobari Block/YNR B-11” falling in Village-Pobari, Tehsil-

Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 23.05 Ha by imposing












Ha “Pobari Block/YNR B-11” at Village-Pobari, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar,

Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan dated 09.03.2016.

The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 10.03.2016. The SEAC has appraised

this project as category B-1. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained. It was

noticed that the lease area is less than 25 Ha. The EAC of MoEF & CC, GoI and SEAC

have appraised this project under category B-1 requiring approval of TOR, Public

Consultation as per procedure prevalent at that time. The MoEF &CC, GoI on 15.01.2016

amended the Notification and as per amended Notification this project activity now falls

under caterogy B-2.



2. Location of Project Village-Pobari, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana


Production capacity

“Pobari Block/YNR B-11”


11,00,000 TPA @147 Trips/day (25 MT)


32



Plantation 7 KLD

Drinking 21 KLD


Budget

34 lakh






area


Pobari

Block/YNR

B-11

N 30O 0’12.942”

N 30O 0’4.75”

N 30O 0’16.79”

N 30O 0’22.25”

E77O 15’44.055”

E77O 16’4.75”

E77O 16’13.82”

E77O 15’54.19”



I Yr. 600 Trees

II Yr. 600 Trees

III Yr. 600 Trees

IV Yr. 600 Trees

V Yr. 600 Trees













(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Mandewala Block/YNR B-38” over an

area of 15.00 Ha. Falling in Village-Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Saharanpur Mines

Management Services Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s

Saharanpur Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and

Sand (Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Mandewala Block/YNR B-38” falling in Village-

Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 15.00

Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.

33











Ha “Mandewala Block/YNR B-38” at Village-Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District











2. Location of Project Village-Mandewala, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District



Production capacity

“Mandewala Block/YNR B-38”


2,40,000 TPA @40 Trips/day (25 MT)




Plantation 10 KLD

Drinking 1 KLD


Budget

26 lakh




meter above water table which ever comes first in

riverbed mining.

34


area


Mandewala, N 30O 15’57.4”

N 30O 15’46.2”

N 30O 15’41.9”

N 30O 15’41.5”

E77O 30’31.7”

E77O 30’32.1”

E77O 30’25.9”

E77O 30’38.4”



I Yr. 400 Trees

II Yr. 400 Trees

III Yr. 400 Trees

IV Yr. 400 Trees

V Yr. 400 Trees












Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand

(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16”

over an area of 44.62 Ha. Falling in Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Radaur,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Jogender Singh S/o Sh.

Mahinder Singh,

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Jogender

Singh S/o Sh. Mahinder Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor Minerals)

Mines namely “Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16” falling in Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-

Radaur, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 44.62 Ha by imposing










35



Ha “Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16” at Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Radaur, District




obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Radaur, District Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana


Production capacity

“Gumthala North Block/YNR B-16”


21,00,000 TPA @280 Trips/day (25 MT)




Plantation 16 KLD

Drinking 40 KLD


Budget

34 lakh






area


Gumthala

North

Block/YNR

B-16

N 29O 57’22.187”

N 29O 56’46.1”

N 29O 57’35.106”

N 29O 56’49.929”

E77O 12’43.538”

E77O 12’42.2”

E77O 13’8.801”

E77O 12’56.757”



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees






36





environment clearance letter


(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36” over an

area of 29.60 Ha. Falling in Village-Nandgarh, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli,

District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Apar Mines Management

Services Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Apar

Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor

Minerals) Mines namely “Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36” falling in Village-Nandgarh,

Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 29.60 Ha. by

imposing stipulations stated therein.











Ha “Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36” at Village-Nandgarh, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, District




obtained.



2. Location of Project Village-Nandgarh, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, District



Production capacity

“Nandgarh Block/YNR B-36”


5,77,000 TPA @77 Trips/day (25 MT)


37



Plantation 11 KLD

Drinking 1.50 KLD


Budget

29 lakh






area

Co-

ordinates

Latitudes Longitudes

of the lease N 30O 12’59”

N 30O 12’47”

N 30O 12’29”

N 30O 12’45”

E77O 25’16”

E77O 25’28”

E77O 25’8.5”

E77O 24’59”



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees










environment clearance letter


(Minor Minerals) Mines namely “Lapra Block/YNR B-10” over an area

of 34.28 Ha. Falling in Village-Lapra, Tehsil- Jagadhari, District

Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Apar Mines Management Services

Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance M/s Apar

Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand (Minor

Minerals) Mines namely “Lapra Block/YNR B-10” falling in Village-Lapra, Tehsil-

Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana over an area of 34.28 Ha by imposing


38











Ha “Lapra Block/YNR B-10” at Village-Lapra, Tehsil- Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar,

Haryana. The project proponent has submitted approved mining plan dated 09.03.2016.

The public hearing was conducted by HSPCB on 05.04.2016. The SEAC has appraised




2. Location of Project Village-Lapra, Tehsil- Jagadhari, District Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana


Production capacity

“Lapra Block/YNR B-10”


15,30,000 TPA @204 Trips/day (25 MT)




Plantation 7 KLD

Drinking 29 KLD


Budget

29 lakh






area

Co-

ordinates

Latitudes Longitudes

of the lease N 30O 05’28”

N 30O 05’18”

N 30O 05’12”

N 30O 05’12”

E77O 22’02”

E77O 22’30”

E77O 22’22”

E77O 21’53”

39



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees











*******

1


held on. 22nd July 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.






Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd & Others.


and was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following observations.

[i] The proposed built up area of the project 149449.28 sqm. The SEAC is required

to calculate the built up area as clarified in the MoEF OM F. No, 19-127/2011-

IA-III dated 02.04.2012 and thereafter re-appraise the project proposal as per

procedure prescribed in the Notification if the proposed built up area found to be

15,0000 sqm or above.

[ii] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for




[iii] The project proponent has proposed to supply 230 KLD to water tankers for





The Project Proponent vide letter dated 04.05.2016 submitted the reply to the

observations the SEAC in its 134th meeting again appraised the project in the light of

observations raised by SEIAA and recommended this project for Environment Clearance.

The recommendations of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting it

was noticed that the total proposed built up area of the project is 149585.26 sqm against

earlier proposed area of 149449.28 sqm. It was observed that the project proponent has

reduced the proposed built up area of basements from 50214 sqm to 38187 sqm and

accordingly also submitted revised Form-I. As per revised proposal the project proponent

has proposed to develop 2 ½ basements instead of earlier proposal of 3 basements. It was

felt by the Authority the proposal to develop 2 ½ basements seems practically not viable

for the structural stability and safety of the building. It was decided that the project

proponent may be asked to justify the same with authenticated records/proof. It was

noticed that the project proponent has proposed to deploy 130 numbers of labour to

2

achieve built up area of 149585.26 sqm which was found not justified. The project

proponent is required to give the exact number of labourers to be deployed permanently

during construction phase and impact of construction activity on the health of the

labourers and the remedial measures to be undertaken. The project proponent is also

required to explain the calculation of 24 KLD of treated water proposed to be use for dust

suppression.



the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the following

within 15 days.

1. The project proponent has proposed to develop 2 ½ basements instead of earlier

proposal of 3 basements. The project proponent is required to justify the same with

authenticated records/proof taking into consideration the structural stability and

safety of the proposed building.

2. The project proponent is required to give the exact number of labourers to be

deployed permanently during construction phase and impact of construction

activity on the health of the labourers and the remedial measures to be undertaken.

3. The project proponent is also required to explain the calculation of 24 KLD of

treated water proposed to be use for dust suppression.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance “Expansion of Model Economic Township” at

Jhajjar, Haryana by M/s Model Economic Township Ltd (formerly

known as M/s Reliance Haryana SEZ Ltd).

The SEAC has recommended for withdrawal of application as has been requested

by the project proponent. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration

in the today’s meeting. It was observed that the Project Proponent on 26.11.2014

submitted application for the “Expansion of Model Economic Township” on the

additional land 92.26 hact. for the development of housing component. The

Environmental Clearance to the existing project of an area 752.72 hact. was granted by

MoEF GoI under category 7(c).

The project proponent vide letter dated 15.09.2015 requested for withdrawal of

application due to change in planning. The sub-committee constituted by SEAC also

visited the site and reported that no construction activity has been undertaken on the

additional land and recommended for withdrawal of application as per request of project

proponent.

In view of the above the Authority agreed with the recommendation of SEAC and

decided to grant permission for withdrawal of the application as has been requested by

project proponent vide letter dated 15.09.2015.

3

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for “Global Industrial Park” located at

Sector-72 & 73, District Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Vashisth

Builders And Engineers Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 72nd meeting of SEIAA held on 18.07.2014

wherein it was noticed that the project proponent has not submitted the complete

information and decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the advice to asked the

project proponent to submit the below mentioned information; re-examine the same and

send its recommendation within stipulated period.

(i) Revise EIA/EMP on the basis of revised baseline data.

(ii) List of projects to be set up in the Industrial state duly authenticated by

the GMDIC.

(iii) NOC from Forest Department.

(iv) Revise water requirement and water baseline diagram @165 lpcd

instead of @111 lpcd.

(v) Revised service line plan without intercepting Revenue Rasta.

(vi) Revised traffic Circulation plan.

The Project Proponent on 12.04.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of

the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 134th meeting held on 30.05.2016 and

SEAC again has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The

recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was

noticed that the project proponent has proposed use of 262 KLD of treated water for

horticulture purposes which was found to be on higher side. The project proponent is

required to submit the revised water calculation for use of treated water for horticulture

and accordingly revised water balance diagram.



the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the information of the following

within 15 days.

1. The project proponent is required to submit the revised water calculation for use of

treated water for horticulture and accordingly revised water balance diagram.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Warehouse Project in the revenue estate

of Village Pathrari, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sunsat Infotech Pvt. Ltd.



construction of Warehouse Project without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The


27.06.2013.



4








Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for w.r.t Expansion of Ware House at Village

Behrampur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s P.D.Enterprises.



construction of Warehouse Project without obtaining prior environmental clearance. The


27.06.2013.










Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Group Housing

Colony located at Sector-112-113, Bajghera Road, Distt-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Lemon Tree Land and Developers Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Revision & Expansion of

Group Housing Colony located at Sector-112-113, Bajghera Road, Distt-Gurgaon,

Haryana as under:

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks

1. Plot area 85161.03 sqm. (21.04 Acres)

2. Built up area Existing 206029.404 sqm

Expansion 2198.9 sqm

Total (208228.36 sqm)

3. License Valid up 28.08.2016/ 10.12.2017

4. Nos. of Plots 2 plots (each plots has 2 basements)

5. Nos. of DU General 1032, EWS 183 , Service personal

108

6. Height 83.7 Meter (NOC from AAI not in records)

7. Green belt 25.5%

5

8. Water requirement 1105 KLD

9. Fresh Water 590 KLD

10. Waste Water 718 KLD

11. STP Capacity 440 KLD & 548 KLD

12 Power Requirement 9.4 MVA DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 3343 kg/day (OWC proposed for 2005.5

kg/day)

14. ECS 1663 ECS

15. RWH 19 pits






[1] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8 & 9 of

Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly explain the asked

information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form 1A.

[2] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the

seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 25 KLD of treated water for DG

cooling and also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO

unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for DG cooling and

management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be

submitted. .

[4] The project proponent has given different figures of total water requirement in the

document i.e. 1029 KLD and 1282 KLD. The project proponent is required to give

the exact quantum of total water requirement with proper calculation.

[5] It was also decided that Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit report to the SEIAA within 15

days on the following points:

(i) The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the

public sewer. The committee shall report the capacity and location of external

sewer.

(ii) To check the proposal of use of 5 KLD of treated water for water body.

(iii) To check the number and location of drying beds for storage of sludge.

(iv) In the water balance diagram for plot II the figures 308 KLD and 372 KLD not

matching.



raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 4 within 15 days and Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender

6

Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on

the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (1.7 acres) at

Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Pursarth Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of IT

Park/Unit (1.7 acres) at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana as

under:



2. Built up area 22673.25 sqm

3. CLU Granted on 01.8.2014 by Urban Local

Bodies Department and Valid for two years

4. Maximum floors 3 Basements + GF + 6 floors

5. Height 37.55 Meter

6. Green belt 25.43%




10. STP Capacity 75 KLD

11. Power Requirement 1950 KVA, DHBVN

12. Solid Waste 305.70 kg/day (OWC proposed for 137.68

kg/day)

13. ECS 300 ECS

14. RWH 02 pits










seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 16.5 KLD of fresh water for DG

cooling and 15+5 KLD of treated water for HVAC make up also show the location

of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment

of water prior to its use for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of

RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.

[4] The validity of CLU is up to 31.07.2016. The project proponent is required to

submit validated CLU.

7



raised observation within 15 days period.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (2.34 acres)

at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s



stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of IT

Park/Unit (2.34 acres) at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana as

under:




3. CLU Granted on 01.08.2014 by Urban Local

Bodies department and valid up to 2 years

from the date of issuance

4. Maximum floors 3 Basements + GF + 9 floors







11. Power Requirement 2530 KVA, DHBVN


kg/day)

12. ECS 575 ECS

13. RWH 03 pits










seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 18 KLD of fresh water for DG





8






Item No.[9] Extension in environment clearance for the construction of proposed

Group Housing Project at Village-Sihi, Sector-84, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Magnum International Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd.

The project proposal is for the grant of extension of validity of environment

clearance letter. The SEAC in its 135th meeting held on 28.06.2016 decided to refer this

case to SEIAA for further action.

The case was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that

the project proponent on 24.11.2015 submitted application for extension of validity of

Environmental Clearance granted by SEIAA vide letter no. SEIAA/HR/2010/1153 dated

29.12.2010 under cat 8(a) valid up to 28.12.2015. The case was examined in the light of

amendment to the notification dated 29.04.2015 and clarification dated 12.04.2016 issued

thereafter by MOEF & CC, GOI and found that the validity of Environment Clearance is

up to 28.12.2017.

In view of the above the Authority decided that the project proponent may be

informed that the validity of EC now stand up to 28.12.2017. The project proponent may

apply for extension of validity one month prior to expiry of validity, if required.

Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance Extension & Expansion of “Residential

Plotted Colony” located at Sector 36-39, Panipat, Haryana by M/s

Taneja Developers & Infrastructure Ltd.

The SEAC has referred this case to SEIAA with the recommendation to seek

clarification from MOEF & CC, GOI whether moratorium has been imposed in this areas

as Panipat town is covered under critically polluted areas as per CEPI score.

The case was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that

the project proponent on 28.10.2014 submitted application for extension and expansion

of residential plotted colony at village Kabri and Faridpur, sector 37-39, Panipat,

Haryana.

It was observed that the MOEF and CC, GOI time and again has imposed

moratorium in different states on the basis of CEPI score. The moratorium has/had been

imposed in specified areas in various districts of states of country. Moratorium was also

imposed in parts of Faridabad and Panipat based on CEPI score declaring the parts of

these two towns as critically polluted areas. Later on the moratorium was lifted vide

MOEF GOI office memorandum 20th may 2016.Therefore clarification from MOEF &

CC, GOI is not required.

9

In view of the above a decision was taken to refer this case back to SEAC with the

advice to appraise this project and send recommendations on merits as per the procedure

prescribed in the Notification.

Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Expansion of Residential

Plotted Colony “Sonepat Global City” at Sec-33, 34 & 35, Village

Rathdhana, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Jindal Realty Pvt. Ltd.



Expansion of Residential Plotted Colony “Sonepat Global City” at Sec-33, 34 & 35,

Village Rathdhana, Sonepat, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area Existing- 446214.8 sqmt (110.2 acre)

Additional- 422716.74 sqmt (104.518 acre)

Total – 868931.54 sqmt(214.718 acre)

2. Built up area Existing – 233482.80 sqmt

Additional – 285896 sqmt

Total – 519378.80 sqmt

3. License Valid up to 10.06.2019

4. No. of Plots Main Plots-1013

NPNL-461

EWS-369

Total-1843

5. Maximum floors GF + 2 floors

6. Height 15 Meter





11. STP Capacity 7 no. of STPs -3600 KLD

12. Power Requirement 22120 KW, DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 11544 kg/day (5 no. of OWC proposed for

8081 kg/day)

14. ECS 1240 ECS

15. RWH 115 pits




involvement of forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation

etc. It was observed by the Authority that:





seasons.

10




Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted

Colony at Sector-33, Village Patti Kaisth Seth, Kaithal, Haryana by

M/s Dhir Construction & Builders Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended for granting environmental clearance for

development of Residential Plotted Colony at Sector-33, Village Patti Kaisth Seth,

Kaithal, Haryana. The project proponent has been granted license for development of

Plotted Colony on an area of 101.799 Acres by the Town and Country Planning

Department. The net plot area for the development is 93.44 Acres. The total built up area

has been indicated as 304247.46 sqm and basement area as 5000 sqm. The project

proposal shall comprise of Residential Plots, EWS Plots, Commercial Area, Institutional,

High School, Primary School, Nursery School, Dispensary, Nursing Homes, Creche,

Community Centre, Religious Building, Milk/vegetable booth, Taxi Stand etc. The

maximum height of the building shall be 14 meter. The project proponent has proposed to

develop green belt on 32.57% of plot area. The total water requirement will be 2120

KLD. Fresh water will be 991 KLD. The waste water generation shall be 1220 KLD

which will be treated in the STP of 1500 KLD capacity. The treated water will be

recycled and reuse. The solid waste generation will be 11549 kg/day and bio-degradable

waste will be 3379 kg/day and the project proponent has proposed to provide four

number of organic waste converter. The project proponent has proposed to construct 100

RWH pits.


today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, waste

water generation, Air Quality, treatment of waste water, green belt development plan,

Non involvement of forest land etc. It was observed by the Authority that the project

proponent has not provided proper information in respect of point no. 8 & 9 of Form-1A.

The project proponent is also required to submit revised water balance diagram for all the

seasons.


decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the below

mentioned observations within 15 days period.





seasons.

11

Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony in the

Revenue Estate of Village Shikhopur, Sector-82-A, Gurgaon Manesar

Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Burman GSC Estate Pvt. Ltd.



Commercial Colony in the Revenue Estate of Village Shikhopur, Sector-82-A, Gurgaon

Manesar Urban Complex, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 17957.92 sqmt (4.4375 acre)

2. Built up area 61579.235 sqmt


4. No. of Tower 3 Towers, 239 Service Apartments

5. Maximum floors GF + 19 floors

6. Height 75 Meter




10. Waste Water 198.22 KLD

11. STP Capacity 280


12. Solid Waste 870.6 kg/day (1 no. of OWC proposed for

609.42 kg/day)

13. ECS 751 ECS

14 RWH 04 pits










seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 34.09 KLD of fresh water and 90.91

KLD of treated water HVAC make up with calculations. Installation of RO unit is

also required for treatment of water prior its use for cooling and also management

of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.

[4] The project proponent shall submit structural stability certificate issued by

IIT/reputed institute.

[5] The project proponent has proposed to deploy 50 number of labour for carrying of

construction of 62000 sqmt. The project proponent shall submit exact number of

labourers to be deployed, the detailed calculations of drinking water for

12




[6] The project proponent has proposed to use 15 KLD of fresh water for swimming

pool makeup. The project proponent is required to justify the same.





Colony projects at Village Sohna, Sector-6, Dist- Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s Arete India Projects Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Colony projects at Village Sohna, Sector-6, Dist- Gurgaon as

under:





4. No. of Tower 23 Towers, 866 DU, Creche, Commercial

area








12. Solid Waste 1732 kg/day (2 no. of OWC proposed for

1385.6 kg/day)

13. ECS 529 ECS

14 RWH 07 pits










seasons.

13

[3] The project proponent has proposed to dispose of 108 KLD of sludge at the

municipal site. The project proponent is required to submit the location of site and

assurance also.

[4] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 174 KLD of treated water in the

drain. The project proponent is required to explain in detail the same along with

location and carrying capacity of drain/sewer.

[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 50 KLD of treated water for

landscaping.




Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical

University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar,

Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.



Maharaja Agrasen Medical University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar,

Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 33620 sqmt (8.30 acre)


3. CLU Granted on 12.08.2014 and valid up to 2

years from the date of issuance


5. Green belt 35.7%




9. STP Capacity 785 KLD and 50 KLD of ETP

10. Power Requirement 5948.28 KVA, UHBVN

11. Solid Waste 1532 kg/day

12. ECS 665 ECS

13 RWH 01 pits





etc. It was observed by the Authority that the project proponent has not given the details

regarding handing and management of bio-medical waste. It was decided that the project

proponent should submit MOU with the authorized vender located in 500 meter radius of

the project area as per the requirement of Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, March

14

2016 or a submit complete plan of bio-medical waste management within the project

area.




Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Commercial Colony located

in the revenue estate of Village Nangli Umarpur, Dist-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s JMD Limited.



construction of Commercial Colony Project without obtaining prior environmental

clearance. The SEAC has appraised this case in the light of MoEF & CC, GoI OM dated

12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013.











“Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.



Housing Colony “Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:





4. No of Floors 17 Blocks+ 2 Basements + GF + 13 floors

5. No. of DU 794 DU, Servant rooms 84, EWS Units 41






11. STP Capacity 2 STPs of 690 KLD

12. Power Requirement 5902.23 KW, DHBVN

13 Solid Waste 2268 kg/day (2 no. of OWC proposed for

15

1588 kg/day)

14 ECS 1489 ECS

15 RWH 13 pits








information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9 of Form-IA.


seasons.

[3] The project proponent is required to submit soft copy giving complete break up of

proposed built up area.

[4] The project proponent is required to justify use of 145 KLD of treated water for

landscaping of an area of 16117 sqmt with calculations.

[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 11 KLD for Misc. use.








Housing Colony Project located at revenue estate of Village Baselwa,

Sec-88, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Amolik Housing Pvt. Ltd.

(Formerly M/s Tarang Resorts Pvt. Ltd.)


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of Affordable

Group Housing Colony Project located at revenue estate of Village Baselwa, Sec-88,

Faridabad, Haryana on total plot area is 20310.158 sqm (5.01 acre). The built up area

shall be 47604.309 sqm. The proposed project shall have 06 residential towers (T1 to

T6), Basement, Stilt, Community centre, Commercial and Anganwadi Creche and 624

Dwelling Units. The maximum height of the building shall be 43.95 meter. The total


waste water generation shall be 372 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 450 KLD

capacity. The total power requirement shall be 3060 KVA which will be supplied by


16

area. The Project Proponent proposed to construct 05 rain water harvesting pits. The

solid waste generation will be 1684 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 425

ECS.











information pertaining to point no. 8 & 9.


seasons.


cooling also show the location of cooling tower on the plan. Installation of RO

unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for cooling and


submitted. .




within 15 days.

Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of “Group

Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana

by M/s Dream Merchant Promoters Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction of “Group

Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 20377.103 sqm (5.03 acre)



4. No of Floors 4 Blocks, 1 Basement, Stilt + 12 Floors.

5. No. of DU MDU 358, EWS 63




17





13 Solid Waste 985 kg/day (1 no. of OWC proposed for 689

kg/day)

14 ECS 679 ECS

15 RWH 5 pits










seasons.

[3] The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower on the

plan. Installation of RO unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use

for cooling and management of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous

waste” shall also be submitted.







Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at

village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature

Builders Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Project at village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana as

under:


1. Plot area 20234.250 sqm (5 acre)



4. No of Floors 7 Towers GF + 14 Floors



18







13 ECS 372 ECS

14 RWH 5 pits










seasons.





[4] The project proponent is required to give the detail of number and size of drying

beds required for storage of sludge from STP in the project area.

[5] The project proponent shall justify the use of 36.7 KLD of treated water for

horticulture with calculations.

[6] The project proponent has proposed to transport 188 KLD of treated water for

construction purposes on other sites. The project proponent is required to give

number of tankers required per day and impact of movement of vehicles on AAQ.




Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for propsed ‘Stone Along with Associated

Minor Minerals’ as Bakhrija Plot-2 over an area of 21.65 ha. In tehsil-

Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by M/s Tirupati Viniyoge Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Tirupati

Viniyoge Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Bakhrija Plot-2” Stone

mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Bakhrija over an area of 21.65

Ha in Tehsil- Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh by imposing stipulations stated therein.

19





Bakhrija Plot-2. The project proponent on 04.11.2015 submitted online application along


the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy NOC from Forest

Department. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category B-1 project

as other mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been

appraised as per proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public

hearing.



2. Location of Project Village- Bakhrija, Tehsil- Narnaul, District-

Mahendergarh


Production capacity


Minerals “Bakhrija Plot-2” Khasra no. 67, 68, 73

74, 75, 76, 77 min, 78 min & 79 min- over an area

of 21.65 Ha

36,00, 000 TPA




Plantation 15 KLD

Drinking 4 KLD


Budget

25 lakh




First 349 to 337 36,00, 000 TPA

Second 337 to 331 36,00, 000 TPA

Third 331 to 319 36,00, 000 TPA

Fourth 319 to 307 36,00, 000 TPA

Fifth 307 to 294 36,00, 000 TPA



I Yr. 300 Trees

II Yr. 300 Trees

III Yr. 300 Trees

IV Yr. 300 Trees

V Yr. 300 Trees





20


today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has collected the baseline

data of October 2015 to December 2015 for the preparatin of EIA/EMP. The SEAC while

approving the TOR also directed the project proponent to collect one month additional

baseline data for the month of January 2016. The project proponent on 24.05.2016

submitted final EIA/EMP by incorporating decission of public consultation and four

month baseline data. It was observed by the Authority that the project proponent has not

discussed in detail the measures to be adopted for supression of respirable particulate

matter. It was decided that the project proponent may be advised to adopt latest

technology available for supression of respirable particulate matter.



the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15

days.

[1] The project proponent shall adopt latest technology available for supression of

respirable particulate matter viz adoption of water curtain technology and submit

undertaking for the same within 15 days.

Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for proposed Stone along with Associated

Minor Minerals at Bakhrija-4 over an area of 34.64 ha Tehsil-

Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh, Haryana by M/s Gradient Business

Consulting Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s Gradient

Business Consulting Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Minor Mineral for proposed “Bakhrija-4”

Stone mines Along with Associated Minor Minerals’ at Village- Bakhrija over an area of

34.64 Ha in Tehsil-Narnaul, District-Mahendergarh, Haryana by imposing stipulations

stated therein.





Khasra no. 89 min, 90, 91, 92, 93, 101 min, 102 min and 103 village- Bakhrija-4. The

project proponent on 30.11.2015 submitted online application along with copy of

approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining

plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy of NOC from Forest

Department and certificate from Mines and Geology Department regarding non existence

of operational mine within 500 meter. The SEAC appraised this project under category

1(a) as category B-1 project as the lease area is more than 25 hac. Approval of TOR,

Public hearing has been carried out

21



2. Location of Project Village- Bakhrija-4, Tehsil-Narnaul, District-

Mahendergarh, Haryana


Production capacity


Minerals Bakhrija-4, Khasra no. 89 min, 90, 91, 92,

93, 101 min, 102 min and 103 over an area of 34.64

Ha

75, 24, 000 TPA




Plantation 15 KLD

Drinking 4 KLD


Budget

35 lakh




First 308 to 288 75, 24, 000 TPA

Second 298 to 268 75, 24, 000 TPA

Third 278 to 258 75, 24, 000 TPA

Fourth 268 to 248 75, 24, 000 TPA

Fifth 258 to 228 75, 24, 000 TPA



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees






today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has collected the baseline

data of November 2015 to January 2016 for the preparatin of EIA/EMP. The project

proponent on 17.06.2016 submitted final EIA/EMP by incorporating decission of public

consultation and four month baseline data. It was observed by the Authority that the

project proponent has not discussed in detail the measures to be adopted for supression of

respirable particulate matter. It was decided that the project proponent may be advised to

adopt latest technology available for supression of respirable particulate matter.



22


days.

[1] The project proponent shall adopt latest technology available for supression of

respirable particulate matter viz adoption of water curtain technology and submit

undertaking for the same within 15 days.

Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Complex project at

Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar

MGF Land Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environmental clearance to this project

was taken up for consideration in the 88th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.02.2016 and the

case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following observations.

[i] The details of calculation of Solid Waste Generation and process for treatment of



[ii] The project proponent has proposed to develop 23.09% of project area under

green belt. The calculations and the plan submitted by the project proponent was

not found in order.

[iii] The parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project proponent

was not found in order. The project proponent is required to give details of

parking calculations and also indicate the dimensions of internal roads and ramp

for entry and exit from the basements on the plan.

The Project Proponent vide letter dated 28.03.2016 submitted the reply which was

taken up in the 136th meeting of SEAC held on 08.07.2016. The SEAC again appraised

the project in the light of observations raised by SEIAA and recommended this project

for Environment Clearance.

The recommendations of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting it was noticed that the copy of the reply was not timely circulated to the

members and the reply further needs detailed examination. It was decided to take up the

case in the next meeting of SEIAA. Accordingly, the case was deferred.

Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for expansion of existing Panipat Institute

of Engineering and Technology 70 milestone, Pattikalayana, Smalkha,

Panipat. (Developed by Vidyapeeth Educational Trust) by Panipat

Institute of Engineering & Technology.






23





proponent.


Housing Project at Sector-63A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,

Village Ullahwas, Tehsil Sohna, Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Sunrays Heights Pvt. Ltd.



Affordable Group Housing Project at Sector-63A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,

Village Ullahwas, Tehsil Sohna, Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 23876.42 sqm



4. No of Floors 6 Blocks (4 Residential + 2 Facility Blocks)

Stilt + 14 floors

5. No. of DU 936



8. Water requirement 666.47 KLD

9. Fresh Water 434.03 KLD




13 Solid Waste 2.47 TPD (OWC proposed for 1.48 TPD)

14 ECS 471 ECS

15 RWH 6 pits










seasons.

24




Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Industrial Project Building

at Villate-Mohammadpur Jharsa, Pace city 2, Sector-36, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Honeywell International (India) Pvt. Ltd.










proponent.

Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex “Orris Market

City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed the construction

commercial complex “Orris Market City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90,

Gurgaon, Haryana as under:





4. No of Floors 4 Blocks, 2 Basements + GF + 13 floors.







11. Power Requirement 3778.50 KW, DHBVN

12. Solid Waste 580 kg/day (1 no. of OWC proposed for 406

kg/day)

13 ECS 541 ECS

14 RWH 2 pits


today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding HT line, water requirement,


25







seasons.





submitted.


shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit report to the

SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:

(i) Zero liquid discharge as proposed by project proponent.

(ii) Location of cooling tower.



raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 3 within 15 days and Sh. S.C.Mann and Sh. Hitender

Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on


Item No.[28]Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex/IT

Park Project at Village Silokhera, Sector-16, Distrct-Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s Vatika One-on-One Pvt. Ltd (formerly known as M/s Calder

Developers Pvt. Ltd).


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of

Commercial Complex/IT Park Project at Village Silokhera, Sector-16, Distrct-Gurgaon,

Haryana on total plot area is 49093.349 sqm (12.13 acre). The built up area shall be

145840.991 sqm. The proposed project shall have 4 Blocks, 3 Basements + GF + 07

floors. The maximum height of the building shall be 32.105 meter. The total water

requirement shall be 339 KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 81 KLD. The waste

water generation shall be 222 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 266 KLD

capacity. The total power requirement shall be 12027 KVA which will be supplied by

DHBVN. The Project Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 25% of project

area. The Project Proponent has proposed to construct 13 RWH pits. The solid waste

generation will be 1051 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 2330 ECS.



26











seasons.




within 15 days.

Item No.[29] Environmental Clearance for the development of “Residential Colony”

at Village Teha and Garhi Keshri, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Bigjo’s

Infraestate Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended for initiating legal action against the project

proponent as the project proponent started the construction of the project without

obtaining prior environmental clearance thus violated the provision of EIA Notification.

The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 constituted sub-committee for

inspection of site. The sub-committee visited the site on 19.03.2016 and reported that the

project proponent has submitted application seeking environmental clearance on

11.04.2013. The TOR were approved on 09.06.2014 and the project proponent on

31.08.2015 submitted final EIA/EMP. The sub-committee reported that there were no

sign of any construction activity at site however structural work for

shops/showrooms/commercial area on both sides of road has been constructed which

have been marked on the plan along with site photographs showing construction. The

sub-committee reported that the project proponent has violated the EIA Notification

dated 14.09.2006 accordingly, the SEAC has recommended for initiating legal action

against the project proponent for starting construction without obtaining prior

environment clearance.

The above recommendation was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.

It was noticed that the project proponent on 20.07.2016 has submitted a representation in

the office of Chairman SEIAA for consideration in respect of their project proposal. It

was decided to take up the case in the next meeting of SEIAA. Accordingly, the case was

deferred.

27

Item No.[30] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony at Village-Nakhrola,

Sector-81 A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Mahamay Building Solution

Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of

Commercial Colony at Village-Nakhrola, Sector-81 A, Gurgaon, Haryana on total plot

area is 8120 sqm (2.006 acre). The built up area shall be 27850 sqm. The proposed

project shall have Commercial Tower, 2 Basements + GF + 11 floors. The maximum


KLD. The fresh water requirement shall be 40 KLD. The waste water generation shall be

70 KLD which will be treated in the STP of 85 KLD capacity. The total power

requirement shall be 2120 KW which will be supplied by DHBVN. The Project

Proponent has proposed to develop green belt on 25% of project area. The Project


will be 529 kg/day. The total parking spaces proposed are 284 ECS.













seasons.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 2 KLD of fresh water for horticulture.

The project proponent is required to submit the revised water calculation for use of

treated water for horticulture and accordingly revised water balance diagram.

[4] The project is located near NH-8. The project proponent is required to carry out

traffic volume/traffic movement study to ensure no traffic congestion on the NH-8

due to the proposed activity.




within 15 days.

*****

1


held on. 11th August 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.




Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Group Housing

Colony located at Sector-112-113, Bajghera Road, Distt-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Lemon Tree Land and Developers Pvt. Ltd.


and the case was deferred with the following observations:





seasons.



unit is also required for treatment of water prior of its use for DG cooling and


submitted. .

[4] The project proponent has given different figures of total water requirement in the

document i.e. 1029 KLD and 1282 KLD. The project proponent is required to give

the exact quantum of total water requirement with proper calculation.


shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit report to the SEIAA within 15

days on the following points:

(i) The project proponent has proposed to discharge excess of treated water in the

public sewer. The committee shall report the capacity and location of external

sewer.

(ii) To check the proposal of use of 5 KLD of treated water for water body.

(iii) To check the number and location of drying beds for storage of sludge.

(iv) In the water balance diagram for plot II the figures 308 KLD and 372 KLD not

matching.


discussed in the today’s meeting along with site visit report of sub-committee. The reply

2

submitted by the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the

Authority that:

[1] The information provided of serial no. 8.1, 9.6 and 9.7 of Form-1A is incomplete.

The project proponent is required to give list of building materials and their energy

efficiencies; How much energy saving has been affected and details of

transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting intensity and air-conditioning load

assumptions.

[2] The assured energy consumption @ 8 KW/sq.ft (serial no. 9.1 of Form-IA) is on

higher side. The project proponent is required to give the exact energy

consumption in accordance in the prescribed norms.

[3] (a) The project proponent is required to show the location of cooling tower in

plot I & plot II.

(b) The use of 25 KL and 28 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is

improper. The water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily

rather quantum of water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be

replenished daily. The project proponent is required to properly calculate

the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit

the revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water

balance diagram.

(c) The requirement of 10 KL/day of water for water body / pool is not

justified. The project proponent is required to replenish the water losses due

to evaporation. The project proponent is to properly calculate the loss of

water due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and shall resubmit the

water requirement for water body/pool and also revised water balance

diagram.

(d) The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration

that:

(i) The treated water shall be used for DG/HVAC cooling. The water demand

shall not be replaced daily only daily water loss due to evaporation shall be

replenished.

(ii) The concentrated reject of treated water used for cooling shall not be

thrown in open and shall be handled as per environmental norms.

In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of

SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions

subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observations

within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of

information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be

issued by the office.

3

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (1.7 acres) at

Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s








seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 16.5 KLD of fresh water for DG








discussed in the today’s meeting. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found

incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The information given in respect of serial no. 8.1 of Form-1A was found not

clear/sketchy. The project proponent is required to properly explain in detail the

same.

[2] The project proponent is required to give assumed energy consumption/sq.ft. of

built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).

[3] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information sought in

respect of serial no. 9.7 viz details of transformers and motor efficiencies, lighting

intensity and air-conditioning load assumptions.

[4] The information given at serial no. 9.12 and 9.1 of Form-1A is self contradictory.

The project proponent is required to explain/clarify the same.

[5] The project proponent should give clear cut plan for disposal of excess of treated

water with authenticated proof.

[6] It has been proposed to adopt Air cool technology for DG cooling on the other

hand location of cooling tower and installation of RO for treatment of treated

water prior to its use for cooling has been given. Please clarify the same.

[7] It has also been proposed to use minimum 2 KLD of RO discharge for horticulture

but the same has not been shown water balance diagram. Please clarify the same.


4



replenished.









Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of IT Park/Unit (2.34 acres)

at Village Dundahera, Sector-19, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s








seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 18 KLD of fresh water for DG












same.

[2] The project proponent is required to give assumed energy consumption/sq.ft. of

built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).

5




[4] The information given at serial no. 9.12 and 9.1 of Form-1A is self contradictory.

The project proponent is required to explain/clarify the same.



[6] It has been proposed to adopt Air cool technology for DG cooling on the other

hand location of cooling tower and installation of RO for treatment of treated

water prior to its use for cooling has been given. Please clarify the same.

[7] It has also been proposed to use minimum 2 KLD of RO discharge for horticulture

but the same has not been shown water balance diagram. Please clarify the same.




replenished.









Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Expansion of Residential

Plotted Colony “Sonepat Global City” at Sec-33, 34 & 35, Village

Rathdhana, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Jindal Realty Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.


discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of representative of project proponent

and their consultant. The reply submitted by the project proponent was found incomplete

and it was observed by the Authority that:

6

[1] The project proponent is required to give proper assumed energy consumption/sq.

ft. of built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).



same.

[3] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.

The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying

capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.

[4] The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for Horticulture and

Misc. use (Summer Season).







Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted Colony

at Sector-33, Village Patti Kaisth Seth, Kaithal, Haryana by M/s Dhir

Construction & Builders Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.


discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of the consultant. The reply submitted by

the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent is required to give proper assumed energy consumption/sq.

ft. of built up area (9.1 of Form-1A).




[3] The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for Horticulture and

Misc. use (Summer Season).




7




Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Colony in the

Revenue Estate of Village Shikhopur, Sector-82-A, Gurgaon Manesar

Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Burman GSC Estate Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.

[3] The project proponent shall justify the use of 34.09 KLD of fresh water and 90.91

KLD of treated water HVAC make up with calculations. Installation of RO unit is

also required for treatment of water prior its use for cooling and also management

of disposal of discharge of RO being “hazardous waste” shall also be submitted.

[4] The project proponent shall submit structural stability certificate issued by

IIT/reputed institute.

[5] The project proponent has proposed to deploy 50 number of labour for carrying of

construction of 62000 sqmt. The project proponent shall submit exact number of

labourers to be deployed, the detailed calculations of drinking water for




[6] The project proponent has proposed to use 15 KLD of fresh water for swimming

pool makeup. The project proponent is required to justify the same.


discussed in the today’s meeting in the presence of their consultant. The reply submitted

by the project proponent was found incomplete and it was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent shall properly explain in detail the asked information

pertaining to Sr. No. 8.1 and 8.3 of Form-IA.

[2] The project proponent is to give the specification of chillers (Sr. No. 9.7 of Form-

IA).

[3] The use of 125 KL of treated water (soft water specification) for DG cooling per

day is improper. The water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily

rather quantum of water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be

8

replenished daily. The project proponent is required to properly calculate the water

losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the revised

treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water balance diagram.

[4] The requirement of 6 KL/day for pool make up is not justified. The project

proponent is required to replenish the water losses due to evaporation. The project

proponent is to properly calculate the loss of water due to evaporation as per

prescribed formula and to resubmit the water requirement for water body/pool

and also revised water balance diagram.




replenished.





the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above

raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall

supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval

the EC letter shall be issued by the office.


Colony projects at Village Sohna, Sector-6, Dist- Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s Arete India Projects Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to dispose of 108 KLD of sludge at the

municipal site. The project proponent is required to submit the location of site and

assurance also.




[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 50 KLD of treated water for

landscaping.

9




[1] The project proponent is required to properly explain in detail the information

asked in respect of Sr. No. 9.1, 9.5, 9.7 and 9.11 of Form-IA and shall submit the

revised details.

[2] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of

HUDA/drain. The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to

date, carrying capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.

[3] The project proponent shall submit assurance of competent authority for disposal

of 108 KLD of sludge at municipal solid waste site, Bhandwari, Gurgaon.

[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 10 lt/sqmt of treated water for

landscaping which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water

requirement for horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.







Item No.[8]Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical

University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar, Haryana

by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.


and the case was deferred with the decision that project proponent should submit MOU

with the authorized vender located in 75 km radius of the project area as per the

requirement of Bio-Medical Waste Management Rules, March 2016 or submit complete

plan of bio-medical waste management within the project area.


discussed in the today’s meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has given

undertaking MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency within 3

months after the grant of environment clearance. The information was not found in order.

In view of the above, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision

that the project proponent may be asked to submit MOU with authorized Bio-Medical

Waste Management Agency within 15 days.

10


“Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.

[3] The project proponent is required to submit soft copy giving complete break up of

proposed built up area.

[4] The project proponent is required to justify use of 145 KLD of treated water for

landscaping of an area of 16117 sqmt with calculations.

[5] The project proponent is required to justify the use of 11 KLD for Misc. use.







[1] The project proponent shall submit the specification of glass (Sr. No. 9.3 of Form-

IA).





HUDA/drain. The project proponent shall submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to

date, carrying capacity and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.

[4] The project proponent submitted the soft copy of built up area of the proposed

project. A decision was taken that Arch. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC shall

examine/verify the built up area and shall submit report to the SEIAA.



raised observation within 15 days period and receipt of satisfactory report from Arch.

Hitender Singh, Member SEAC.

11

Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of “Group

Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana

by M/s Dream Merchant Promoters Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.











[1] The project proponent shall submit the specification of glass (Sr. No. 9.3 of Form-

IA).





HUDA/drain. The project proponent shall submit copies of paid up to date,

carrying capacity to HUDA and location of HUDA sewer line on the plan.

[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 08 Lt/sqmt of treated water for



[5] The use of 12 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is improper. The water

requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water

lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project

proponent is required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as

per prescribed formula and resubmit the revised treated water requirement for DG

cooling and also revised water balance diagram.


12



replenished.






Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at

village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature

Builders Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.





[4] The project proponent is required to give the detail of number and size of drying

beds required for storage of sludge from STP in the project area.

[5] The project proponent shall justify the use of 36.7 KLD of treated water for

horticulture with calculations.

[6] The project proponent has proposed to transport 188 KLD of treated water for






[1] The project proponent shall properly explain in detail the information asked of Sr.

No. 8.1, 8.3 and 9.7 of Form-IA as the same was found not clear.

[2] It has been proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by vermi-composting technique

(8.4 of Form-IA), whereas in the presentation before SEAC it has been proposed

to set up OWC for treatment of bio-degradable waste. Please clarify the same.

[3] The project proponent shall submit assumed power consumption per sqft of built

up area (9.1 of Form-IA).

13



[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 05 Lt/sqmt of treated water for




that the project proponent may be asked to submit reply to the above raised observation

within 15 days period.

Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Complex project

at Village Badshahpur, Sector-66, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s EMAAR

MGF Land Ltd.


was taken up for consideration in the 88th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.02.2016 and the

case was referred back to SEAC for reconsideration with the following observations.




[ii] The project proponent has proposed to develop 23.09% of project area under

green belt. The calculation and the plan submitted by the project proponent was

not found in order.

[iii] The parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project proponent

was not found in order. The project proponent is required to give details of

parking calculations and also indicate the dimensions of internal roads and ramp

for entry and exit from the basements on the plan.


taken up in the 136th meeting of SEAC held on 08.07.2016. The SEAC again appraised

the project in the light of observations raised by SEIAA and recommended this project

for Environment Clearance.


meeting it was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The revised parking plan and traffic circulation plan submitted by the project

proponent was not found legible. It was also found that the internal road required

for movement of fire tender is also not properly marked on the plan. The project

proponent is required to resubmit the legible traffic circulation plan (A-1 size)

clearly showing the dimensions of internal roads and road identified for smooth

movement of fire tender.

[2] The project is located near SH-13/NH-08. The project proponent is required to

carry out traffic volume/traffic movement study to ensure no traffic congestion on

the SH-13/NH-8 due to the proposed activity.

14



the conditions subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above

raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall

supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval

the EC letter shall be issued by the office.


Housing Project at Sector-63A, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex,

Village Ullahwas, Tehsil Sohna, Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Sunrays Heights Pvt. Ltd.







seasons.




[1] The project proponent shall properly explain in detail the asked information

pertaining to Sr. No. 8.1 and 9.1 of Form-IA.










Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex “Orris Market

City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.



15





seasons.





submitted.




(i) Zero liquid discharge as proposed by project proponent.

(ii) Location of cooling tower.







[2] The use of 57 KL of treated water for DG/HVAC cooling per day is improper.

The water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum

of water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The

project proponent is required to properly calculate the water losses due to

evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the revised treated water

requirement for DG cooling and also revised water balance diagram.




replenished.



[4] The project proponent has proposed to use 6.7 lt/sqmt of treated water for


requirement for Horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.

[5] The site visit report of committee is awaited.

16


that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised

observation within 15 days period and receipt of satisfactory site inspection report of sub-

committee.

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for the development of “Residential Colony”

at Village Teha and Garhi Keshri, Sonepat, Haryana by M/s Bigjo’s

Infraestate Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended for initiating legal action against the project

proponent as the project proponent started the construction of the project without

obtaining prior environmental clearance thus violated the provision of EIA Notification.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.


[1] M/s Bigjo’s Infraestate Ltd on 11.04.2013 submitted Form-I, Form-IA,

Conceptual Plan for seeking environmental clearance for the development of

plotted colony under item no. 8 (b) of schedule of EIA Notification dated

14.09.2006 as proposed built up area was indicated is 244208.89 sqmt. The SEAC

in its 104th meeting held on 13.05.2014 approved the TOR required for carrying

out EIA study being category 8 (b) project.

[2] The Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana has granted license no. 208

of 2007 for development of plotted colony having total area of 72.90 Acres to the

project proponent. The project area is part of sector-6, 7 & 8 of Gannaur Township

of HUDA, Sonepat. It was noticed that as per records of SEIAA, HUDA has not

obtained prior environmental clearance for development of Township under item 8

(b) of EIA Notification. It was also not clear whether MOEF & CC, GOI had

granted EC to HUDA for development of Gannaur Township in the absence of

SEIAA. A report from CA, HUDA in the matter is required before initiating any

action.

[3] The SEAC in its 123rd meeting held on 11.12.2015 constituted sub-committee for

inspection of site. The sub-committee visited the site on 19.03.2016 and reported

that the project proponent has submitted application seeking environmental

clearance on 11.04.2013. The TOR was approved on 09.06.2014 and the project

proponent on 31.08.2015 submitted final EIA/EMP. The sub-committee reported

that there were no sign of any construction activity at site however structural work

for shops/showrooms/commercial area on both sides of road has been constructed

which have been marked on the plan along with site photographs showing

construction. The sub-committee reported that the project proponent has violated

the EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 accordingly, the SEAC has recommended

17

for initiating legal action against the project proponent for starting construction

without obtaining prior environment clearance.

[4] The Hon’ble NGT has already quashed the operation of OM of MoEF & CC, GoI

OM dated 12.12.2012 and 27.06.2013. The SEIAA vide letter no.

SEIAA/HR/15/634 dated 28.12.2015 has already sought clarification from MoEF

& CC, GoI regarding change in procedure if any in violation cases keeping in

view the quashing of OM dated 12.12.2012 by Hon’ble NGT but no response

from the MOEF & CC, GOI has been received and legal action as recommended

by SEAC in the forgoing para, cannot be initiated against M/s Bigjo’s Infraestate

Ltd at this stage.

[5] The project proponent on 20.07.2016 submitted a representation and also an

undertaking in the office of Chairman SEIAA stating that the project area is for

development of plotted colony for 72.90 Acres which is less than 50 Ha. and also

declared that they shall not be constructing the buildings on the plots as approved

in the layout plan and they shall provide services infrastructure, green belt only.

The residential plots of different sizes shall be allotted to the individuals and no

construction shall be raised by their firm. It has been further stated that the 4%

area marked for commercial/public utility services shall also be allotted to

individuals for development and shall not raise any construction on these plots.

[6] The report of sub-committee was not clear regarding calculation of already

constructed built up area and proposed built up area of commercial +

other/community buildings. Accordingly, detailed calculation of the already

constructed area and proposed constructed area was called for from Arch. Hitender

Singh, Member SEAC. The examination of report dated 10.08.2016 submitted by

Arch. Hitender Singh, Member SEAC revealed that the total area of proposed

buildings (commercial + other/community building) is 28214.22 sqmt (16511.15

sqmt commercial pocket + 11703.07 sqmt community buildings) and it has also

been reported that the project proponent has initiated construction at site in the

commercial area only.

[7] The project proponent vide letter dated 10.08.2016 again requested to de-list their

case on the basis of undertaking already submitted as the project proposal does not

fall under the ambit of EIA Notification.

In view of the above, the Authority was of the view that the project proponent has

now decided not to carry out any kind of civil construction activity in the licensed area

granted to them for development of plotted colony by Town & Country Planning

Department as per undertaking given and shall allot all the residential plots, commercial

plots, community building plots to the individuals. The Authority decided to de-list the

case as requested by the project proponent with the following decisions:

18

[1] CA, HUDA may be requested to look into the matter and inform whether the prior

environment clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 for development

of Gannaur Township by HUDA has been obtained or not?

[2] Director General, Town & Country Planning Department may be requested not to

issue any completion certificate to M/s Bigjo’s Infraestate Ltd (license no. 208 of

2007 for plotted colony) as the project proponent has intimated that they shall not

raise any civil construction of any kind of building including residential plots/

commercial plots, public utility services in the project area and the same will be

developed by individuals after obtaining necessary approvals of building plans in

their name from your department.




The recommendation of SEAC for initiating legal action for violation of EIA

Notification on the basis of report of sub-committee was considered in the 88th meeting of

SEIAA held on 29.02.2016. It was observed that the sub-committee reported that the

project proponent has started the construction without obtaining prior environment

clearance.

The project proponent vide letter dated 03.02.2016 requested to visit the site again

to see the actual position at site as they could not mobilize their team and co-ordinate

with committee members as information was received only one day before site visit. The

Authority decided to depute Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra, Members SEAC to

check the status of construction and submit its report to SEIAA. A letter in this regard

was also issued on 15.03.2016.The committee visited the site on 07.05.2016 and has

submitted the report on 26.07.2016.

The site visit report submitted by the sub-committee was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. It has been reported by sub-committee that a

temporary structure of 209 sqmt has been raised by the project proponent after seeking

the approval of STP Gurgaon and this structure is not the part of actual building plan. The

temporary shed on the right side of corner where a liquor vend is operational is not the

part of the project. Some portion of the site was found excavated but no sign of any work

in foundation was noticed and no material was stored at the site. The sub-committee

reported that some portion of site was excavated but safely construed that there is no

violation.

In view of the above the Authority decided to refer this case to SEAC for appraisal

and recommendation on merit as per procedure prescribed in the Notification and time to

time guidelines issued by MOEF & CC, GOI.

19

Item No. [17] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the


Notification dated 14.09.2006; for development of Residential

Plotted Colony (281.577 Acre) Namely “Vatika India Next” at

Sector- 81, 82, 82A, 83 and 85, Village-Simi, Shikhopur and

Sikandarpur, Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.

The reply to the show-cause notice submitted by the project proponent on

25.03.2016 was taken up for consideration in the 92nd meeting of SEIAA held on

15.06.2016. In this meeting personal hearing was also granted to M/s Vatika Ltd. for

defending the allegations leveled by the complainant. M/s Vatika Ltd. on 21.06.2016

submitted written statement on the basis of personal hearing.

The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority

was of the unanimous view that the matter requires detailed examination and also

decided to authorize Chairman SEIAA to take decision in the this matter independently

which will be acceptable to the Authority.

Item No. [18] Show-cause notice for violation of imposed conditions of the


Notification dated 14.09.2006; for construction of “ATHARVA”

Group Housing project at sector-109, Village-Panwala,

Khusrupur, Gurgaon by M/s Raheja Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The reply to the show-cause notice submitted by the project proponent on

25.04.2016 was taken up for consideration in the 92nd meeting of SEIAA held on

15.06.2016. In this meeting personal hearing was also granted to M/s Raheja Developers

Pvt. Ltd. for defending the allegations leveled by the complainant. M/s Raheja

Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 23.06.2016 submitted written statement on the basis of personal

hearing.

The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority

was of the unanimous view that the matter requires detailed examination and also

decided to authorize Chairman SEIAA to take decision in the this matter independently

which will be acceptable to the Authority.

Consideration of replies of EIA cases (Decided by SEIAA to grant EC subject to

satisfactory submission of reply to the observations).

Permission of Chair was obtained to consider the replies received from the project

proponent in the cases wherein a decision was taken in the last meeting of SEIAA to

grant environment clearance as recommended by SEAC subject to submission of

satisfactory reply. The reply of the following projects was considered.

[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony


Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Hans Propcon Pvt. Ltd & Others.

20

The reply dated 02.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting in the presence

of representative of the project proponent and Architect. The reply submitted was found

in order. It was decided to issue environment clearance letter.

[2] Environmental Clearance for “Global Industrial Park” located at Sector-72

& 73, District Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Vashisth Builders And Engineers

Ltd.

The reply dated 08.08.2016 was considered in the today’s meeting. It was decided

to issue environment clearance letter subject to satisfactory submission of following

information in corrected form.

[i] The project proponent is to submit location of external sewer/carrying capacity of

sewer where it has been proposed to discharge 68 KLD of treated water and also

copies of EDC/IDC paid.

[3] Environmental Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing

Colony Project located at revenue estate of Village Baselwa, Sec-88,

Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Amolik Housing Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly M/s Tarang

Resorts Pvt. Ltd.)




[i] The project proponent shall properly explain the details asked at Sr. No. 8.1 and

9.7 of Form-IA.

[ii] The assumed energy consumption @ 8 KW is on higher side. Proper figures to be

given.

[iii] It has been proposed to discharge treated water in the external sewer of HUDA.



[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex/IT Park

Project at Village Silokhera, Sector-16, Distrct-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Vatika One-on-One Pvt. Ltd (formerly known as M/s Calder Developers Pvt.

Ltd).





9.7 of Form-IA.

[ii] The project proponent shall give the assumed energy consumption per sqft of built

up area as the same is not given (9.1 of Form-IA)

21




[iv] It has been proposed to treat bio-degradable waste by vermi-composting

technique (8.4 of Form-IA), whereas in the presentation before SEAC it has been

proposed to set up OWC for treatment of bio-degradable waste. Please clarify the

same.

[v] The information given against Sr.No. 9.1 and 9.12 of Form-IA is contradictory.

The project proponent is required to explain the same.

[5] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony at Village-Nakhrola,

Sector-81 A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Mahamay Building Solution Pvt. Ltd.





9.7 of Form-IA.

[ii] The project proponent shall give the assumed energy consumption per sqft of built

up area as the same is not given (9.1 of Form-IA)




[iv] At Sr. No. 9.12 of Form-IA it has been mentioned that the project is centrally air

conditioner but requirement of water for HVAC make up and DG cooling has not

been shown in the revised water balance diagram submitted with reply.

*******

1

Minutes of the 95th

meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 26th

August 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.

The full Authority is present. The Cases recommended by SEAC for Environmental

Clearance or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No. 661-663 dated

22.08.2016 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:- Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of “PALM VALLEY”

developed at Sec-14, Village Kot, Panchkula (Ext II) by M/s Konark Rajhans Estates (P) Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “PALM VALLEY” developed at Sec-14, Village Kot, Panchkula (Ext II) as under:




3. License Valid up 11.10.2016

4. Nos. of Towers 9 Towers + Basement + Stilts + 13 floors

5. Nos. of DU 682 DU, 128 EWS, 78 Servant Personal unit, Commercial Area, Community Centre

& Nursery School

6. Height 45 Meter






12 Power Requirement 4500 KW UHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1840 kg/day (OWC proposed for 1288

kg/day)

14. ECS 1062 ECS

15. RWH 10 pits





etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] Different figures of water calculation has been given in Form-I and presentation

i.e. @ 150 lt/person in Form-I and @ 135 lt/person in presentation. Revised Form-

I with proper calculation to be submitted. [2] Operational Tube-well exists in the project area. Permission of CGWA for

abstraction of ground water is required.

2

[3] Kholhai Raitan Wild Life Sanctuary is located at a distance of 4.7 km. Permission

of National Wild Life Board is required. Proof of submission of application for

Wild Life clearance is required.






issued by the office. Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex

project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 91st

meeting of SEIAA held on 06.05.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations. [1] The License no. 44 of 2010 measuring 128.94 Acres has been granted for

development of plotted colony. The total saleable area of the license is 47.844 Acres

(45.884 Acres for plotted development + 2 Acres for commercial). The commercial

pocket earmarked in the approved layout plan is integral part of plotted colony and

the separate application for environmental clearance for the commercial pocket (2

Acre) cannot be considered as the license has been granted for plotted colony and not

for development of commercial project. [2] The present proposal of independent commercial complex is also practically not viable as

the commercial area is in continuation of the plotted colony area and for access to the

commercial pocket the project proponent shall have to use land of plotted area. Therefore

the project proponent is required to seek environmental clearance for plotted colony

along with the commercial complex. [3] The proposal submitted by the project proponent for independent commercial

complex do not conform to the approved layout plan because as per approved

layout plan the project proponent is also required to develop the below mentioned

units in 2 Acres of commercial complex:

(i) Clinic (2 nos. of 250 sqm each)

(ii) ATM (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)

(iii) Beauty parlor (2 nos. of 12 sqm each)

(iv) Multipurpose booth (2 nos. of 5x5.5 meter each)

(v) Sub Post Office (1 no. of 40 sqm)

Where as, the project proponent has failed to show the above units in the commercial pocket.

3

[4] It is not clear whether the project proponent has undertaken the development of plotted

colony as no photographs of the site has been submitted with application. The license has

been granted in the year 2010 and is now renewed up to 08.06.2016. The project

proponent is required to give justified reasons for not starting development of plotted

colony. The Director of the company shall submit an undertaking with the declaration

that the development of the plotted colony has not been started and shall submit latest

photograph of the licensed area.

The SEAC in its 137th

meeting held on 28.07.2016 referred the matter to the SEIAA

with the observation that the instant case has been submitted by project proponent in the

name of M/s JMS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. which is a part of the plotted colony of M/s

Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd, Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana. The License was granted to M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd for an area of 128.94

Acres (51.7998 Ha). The license had now expired and whether Environmental Clearance can

be considered in such cases may be decided by the SEIAA and also whether environment

clearance can be considered in the name of M/s JMS buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed

that M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd. has sold the land of commercial area under

consideration for environmental clearance to M/s JMS Buildtech Ptv. Ltd. and M/s JMS

Buildtech pvt. Ltd. has approached SEAC and submitted fresh application in the name of

JMS Buildtech for appraisal by SEAC during the 137th

meeting of SEAC. It was also

observed that the license granted to the M/s Ramprasta Estate for development of plotted

colony has also expired and the name of M/s JMS buildtech Pvt. Ltd is also not included as

one of the licensee in the license. It was decided do defer the case to the next meeting as

detailed study in the matter is required. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next

meeting. Item No.[3]Environmental Clearance for construction of “Residential Cum

Commercial Complex” at Sector-79, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Robust Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 92nd

meeting of SEIAA held on 15.06.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations. [1] The licenses submitted by the project proponent are not valid. [2] The project proponent shall justify the use of 4 KLD of water for Tyre washing.

[3] The project proponent shall submit detailed break up of 20 KLD of water

proposed to be used during construction phase. [4] The project proponent shall submit the water balance diagram during monsoon

period.

4

[5] The project proponent has proposed to use 6 litre/sqmt of treated water for

irrigation/horticulture purposes. The project proponent shall give the proper

justification. [6] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting up of

STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan. The Project Proponent

on 08.07.2016 submitted the reply to the observations of

the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 137th

meeting held on 29.07.2016 and


recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The water demand during construction phase has been proposed as 19 KLD out of

which 4 KLD treated water for curing but for how much period/days this demand will

persist was not clear as the water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The

project proponent is required to submit the exact time period during which 4 KLD of

treated water will be required for curing of concrete floor and shall submit revised

water calculation. [2] It has been proposed to discharge 86 KLD of treated water to public sewer/tankers. The

project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying

capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan or authenticated proof in the

shape of undertaking/MOU for supply of treated water to the nearby sites with proper

justification for their construction and also the impact on the AAQ due to movement of

tankers for transportation of the same.






issued by the office. Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for propsed Group Housing Colony project

“The Melia” located at Village Mohammadpur Gujjar, Sector-35, Sohna Dist-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DSS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.


meeting of SEIAA held on 15.06.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations. [1] The project proponent on 31.05.2015 uploaded online application with MOEF & CC,

GOI. The EAC of MOEF & CC, GOI on 19.07.2015 approved the TOR for preparation

of EIA/EMP whereas the project proponent collected the data during March 2015 to May

2015 i.e. prior to approval of TOR and even submission of application. The study carried

out before submission of application by the

5

project proponent is not in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the

notification. [2] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting up of

STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan. [3] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction

phase with detailed break up. [4] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management

during construction phase. [5] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level

of tallest building. [6] The project proponent has proposed to supply 228 KLD treated water to tankers




mitigation measures. [7] The project proponent has proposed to use treated water for DG set Cooling but

the location of cooling tower has not been shown. The project proponent is

required of show the cooling tower on the plan. The project proponent is advised

to adopt Air Cooling Technology i.e. Radiator/ cooling coil in order to save the

water.





recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] It has been informed that approval for supply of 60 KLD of treated water from STP of

Behrampur Gurgaon has been obtained vide letter no, 910 dated 07.11.2014. The

project proponent is required to submit copy of the same. [2] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they will set up

STP in the labour camp area during construction phase if waste water generation

exceeds 10 KLD. [3] The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof in the shape of

undertaking/MOU for supply of treated water to the nearby sites for their

construction.

In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to

accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions subject to the satisfactory

submission of the clarification on the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided

that the project proponent shall supply the copies of

6 information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office. Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Project at

Sector-53, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vipul Limited.



Residential Project at Sector-53, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:





4. Nos. of Towers 3 Towers + 3 Basement + Stilts +37 floors

5. Nos. of Apartments 382







12 Power Requirement 3540.53 KWUHBVN


kg/day)

14. ECS 3125 ECS

15. RWH 20 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water, green

belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli


etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they will provide

Multi stage pumping sets for pumping of water. [2] The project proponent has not properly filled up columns of point no. 8.4 (vermi

composting), 8.1 & 8.3 of Form-IA; the project proponent is required to clearly

explain the same [3] The height of the building is 142.85 Meter. The project proponent is required to

submit legible copy of plan approved by fire department showing internal road for

movement of fire tender. [4] The water demand during construction phase has been proposed as 15.75 KLD out of

which 10 KLD treated water for curing but for how much period/days this demand

will persist was not clear as the water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The

project proponent is required to submit the exact time period during which 10 KLD of

treated water will be required for curing of concrete floor and shall submit revised

water calculation.

7 [5] The requirement of 20 KL/day of water for water body / pool is not justified. The

project proponent is required to replenish the water losses due to evaporation. The

project proponent is to properly calculate the loss of water due to evaporation as

per prescribed formula and shall resubmit the water requirement for water

body/pool and also revised water balance diagram. [6] The project proponent has proposed to use 07 Lt/sqmt of treated water for landscaping

which is on higher side. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for

horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [7] The project proponent has proposed 4.6 KLD for road washing just to attain zero

exist discharge. The requirement of 4.6 KLD is on higher side. The project

proponent is required to justify the same. [8] The project proponent in the affidavit dated 12.07.2016 has stated to use 100 KLD of

treated water for construction on the contrary in the project report it has been mentioned

15+5 KLD the project proponent is required to justify the same.






issued by the office. Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony at

Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s JMK Holdings Pvt. Ltd.


meeting of SEIAA held on 15.06.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.

[1] The project proponent has mentioned the depth of ground water table at 4 meter.

The project proponent is required to submit authenticated proof of some

government agency/CGWB. [2] No environmental safe guards have been suggested in recommendations for the

safety / protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of

ground water table at 4 meter. [3] The project proponent shall submit the specification of the area required for setting up of

STP in the project area and clearly earmark the same on the plan. [4] The project proponent shall submit the requirement of water during construction

phase with detailed break up. [5] The project proponent shall submit the details of RWH/Storm water management

during construction phase. [6] The project proponent shall submit the proposed Stack Height above the roof level


8





mitigation measures. [8] The project proponent shall earmark the space reserved for setting up of OWC for

treatment of Bio-degradable waste in the project area. [9] The project proponent has proposed to use 60 KLD of water for horticulture. The

project proponent is required to justify the same with proper calculations.


meeting held on 29.07.2016 considered the reply dated 29.06.2016 submitted by the project proponent to the observations raised by SEIAA and again

recommended this project for environment clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration the today’s meeting. It was observed that the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has not suggested environmental safe guards for the safety /

protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of ground

water table at 4 meter in his reply. The SEAC has also not reported the same in the

recommendation. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [2] The project proponent has not given the detail of break up of water requirement for

construction. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [3] The project proponent is required to give the specifications/dimensions of the area

reserved for setting up of STP and OWC as the same has not been given in the

reply. [4] The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof/MOU for supply of 399

KLD of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction. [5] The water requirement for horticulture @ 9 lt./sqm is on the higher side. The

project proponent is required to revise the same and also to submit revised water

balance diagram.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation within 15 days period to all the members of the Authority. Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for “Ware House” at Village-LowaKhurd,

Dist-Jhajjar, Haryana by M/s RelaxoFootwears Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Ware House” at Village-

LowaKhurd, Dist-Jhajjar, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 45945.15 sqm. (111.35Acres)

9


3. CLU Granted on 01.09.2012 valid up to 2 years

from the date of issuance

4. Nos. of Towers 3 Towers + 3 Basement + Stilts +37 floors

5. Height 21 Meter






11. Power Requirement 240 KWUHBVN

12 Solid Waste 272 kg/day

13. ECS 104 ECS

14. RWH 8 pits





etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The CLU has been granted for setting up of Warehouse on 01.09.2012. The

existing built up area is 15402.3 sqmt and proposed built up area is 18780 sqmt

(total 34182.9 sqmt). It is a case of expansion and not new as indicated in Form-I.

The project proponent is required to rectify Form-I. [2] The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is

operational and complete and construction was started after getting the approval

for building plan of 15402 sqmt and the construction has been carried out in

accordance with the approved plans. [3] It has been proposed to use 4 KLD treated water for curing for expansion of

project but for how much period/days this demand will persist was not clear as the

water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The project proponent is

required to submit the exact time period during which 4 KLD of treated water will

be required for curing of concrete for construction of expansion and shall submit

revised water calculation. [4] The water requirement for miscellaneous use in the existing area is shown as 1

KLD whereas use of 5 KLD has been shown after expansion. The project

proponent is required to justify the same as how the water requirement for

miscellaneous use has increased from 1 KLD to 5 KLD. [5] The project proponent shall submit green belt development plan of existing unit

covering 4594.515 sqm and on 4795.635 sqm proposed under expansion i.e. total

9387.15 sqm.

10

[6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the SEIAA

within 15 days on the following points:

(i) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using

treated water.

(ii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing

project.

(iii) Management of Municipal Solid waste.

(iv) Observations raised by SEIAA 1 to 5 above.



raised observation within 15 days and Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated

above within 15 days period. Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project

Village-Sarai Alawardi, Sector-110, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Snowdrop Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group Housing Project

Village-Sarai Alawardi, Sector-110, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 41480.213 sqm. (10.25Acres)

2. Built up area 96969.542sqm


4. Nos. of Towers 9 Towers + 2 Basement, Residential

Apartments, EWS Apartments, Community

facile-ties, convenient Shopping, Nursery

School.

Nos. of Units Total units 639 (465 Residential, 76 Service

personal units, 98 EWS)

5. Height 77.47 Meter (NOC AAI not obtained)






11. Power Requirement 4400 KWDHBVN


13. ECS 1062 ECS

14. RWH 8 pits



belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

11 involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent shall give the exact green belt development plan within the

zoned area where development is to be taken along with calculations. [2] The traffic circulation plan, entry and exit points given in the plan not clear if

compared with zoning plan. The project proponent is required to provide sufficient

width of internal road to ensure smooth movement of vehicles and shall submit

revised traffic circulation plan specially showing internal road earmarked for

movement of fire tender. [3] The project proponent shall submit NOC from AAI and structural stability

certificate. [4] The project proponent shall submit location of STP and solid waste management

site on the plan with specification of area. [5] The project proponent shall submit assurance of water during construction phase

issued by competent authority. [6] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the information asked against

sr. no. 9.1, 9.7, 9.12; and also clarify the contradictory information given under 9.7

and 9.12 of Form-IA. [7] The use of 41 KL of treated water for DG/HVAC cooling per day is improper. The water

requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water lost due

to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project proponent is

required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed

formula and resubmit the revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also

revised water balance diagram. [8] The project proponent is required justify and submit authenticated proof in the

shape of undertaking/MOU for supply of treated water 120 KLD and 60 KLD in

monsoon and winter season.






issued by the office. Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project at Village

Khanpur and Kawarsika, Sector-17, Sohna, Tehsil Nuh, Mewat, Haryana by

M/s Goldsouk Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd,

This case was lastly considered in the 90th

meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016 and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations:

12

[1] The project proponent was asked to submit reply with respect to observation “Impact

on ambient air quality due to increased traffic volume needs to be evaluated” whereas

the project proponent has given a vague reply. The project proponent is required to

give the values of existing AAQ of the project area, predicted values of AAQ due to

increased traffic volume and detailed mitigation measures to be adopted for

management of environment. [2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for


scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in case

the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above. [3] The project proponent has proposed to supply 182 KLD to water tankers for






meeting held on 04.08.2016 and the SEAC referred to SEIAA for taking further necessary action as per the information provided by project

proponent that the three observations raised by SEIAA in the said meeting are not valid

in light of the MoEF letter dated 10.11.2015.

The case as referred by SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was decided by the Authority that: [1] Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection

to check the status of construction if any and shall also submit the report on the

observation of SEIAA (1-3) as indicated above within 15 days

period.

In view of the above the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. R. K.

Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the

report of the observation of SEIAA within 15 days period. Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Expansion of Group Housing

Complex” at Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s Ruhil Promoters

Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s Kashi Promoters Pvt)


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Expansion of Group Housing Complex” at Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 43090.93 sqm (Existing 36699.36 sqm.

+Expansion 6391.57) (10.6 Acres)

2. Built up area 112924.37 sqm (Existing 98641.44sqm +

Expansion 14282.93 sqm )


4. Nos. of Towers 10 Towers + EWS + 01 Basement +

13

G+13/S+12

5. Nos. of DU 674 DU, 119 EWS, 68 Servant units,

Commercial, Nursery School, Community

building







12 Power Requirement 4340 KWUHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1714 kg/day (02 nos. of OWC proposed for

1200 kg/day)

14. ECS 1104 ECS

15. RWH 11 pits





etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] Ground water table is very shallow (8 meter) construction of one level basement

has been proposed. The project proponent has not suggested environmental safe

guards for the safety / protection of proposed building structure keeping in view

the depth of ground water table [2] The project proponent is required to submit the water balance diagram for all the

seasons. [3] The use of 38 KLof treated water for DG cooling per day is improper. The water

requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water lost

due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project proponent

is required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed


revised water balance diagram. [4] The project proponent has proposed to use 10 lt/sqmt of treated water for landscaping


horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [5] The project proponent shall give the breakup of use of 15 KLD of treated water

for miscellaneous use. [6] The project proponent has proposed to use jute bags in construction (8.3 of Form

IA). The project proponent is required to explain the same in detail along with the

process involved. [7] The project proponent has proposed to transport 115 KLD of treated water for


14


The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof/MOU for supply of 115 KLD

of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction. [8] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC


SEIAA within 15 days on the following points: (i) Water balance diagram of existing project and proposed project for expansion. (ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans. (iii) Status of construction in expansion part if any. (iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using treated

water. (v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste. (vii) Reply to the observations from sr. no.1 to 7 as above.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above

raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 7 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.

Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the

points as indicated above within 15 days period. Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group

Housing Colony project at Village Dhamlaka, Sector-26 & 27,

Rewari, Haryana by M/s B.M Gupta Developers Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 90th

meeting of SEIAA held on 22.04.2016and the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations: [1] The project proponent has proposed to discharge 221.6 KLD of treated water in the Drain

which is not acceptable. The project proponent is required to submit revised proposal

ensuring that the treated waste water is recycled/reused and excess of treated waste water

is discharged in public sewer system. [2] The project proponent shall submit the detailed calculations of drinking water for


scheme in the labour camp area during construction phase. Provision for STP in case

the waste water generation is 10 KLD or above. [3] The height of the building is 75.45 meters the project proponent is required to

obtained structural stability certificate from the competent authority. [4] The project proponent has given different figures of stack height 2.82 meter (in

presentation copy) and 6.32 meter (in conceptual plan) above the building height.

The project proponents clarify the same.

15

[5] The project proponent has not discussed in detail the storm water management

plan during construction phase. The project proponent is required to submit the

same. [6] In the soil investigation report it has been mentioned that the ground water table was

encountered at 9.5 to 9.9 meter depth, whereas as per Draft Revised Regional Plan-2021 the

average ground water table of Rewari is 16.3 meter. The project proponent is required to

clarify the same with authenticated proof/document.





recommendation of SEAC was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has not submitted copy of EDC/IDC paid up to date,

location of HUDA sewer on plan. The project proponent is required to submit the

same.



the condition in addition to the usual conditions in practice subject to submission of

above asked information within 15 days. Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for extension of validity of EC for Group

Housing Colony at Sector-48, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sweta Estates Pvt. Ltd.

The case referred by SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting.

It was noticed that the project proponent had obtained environment clearance from MoEF,

GoI on 10.04.2007 having built up area of 331520 sqm under item no. 8 (b). The site was

inspected by the Director, Northern RO, MoEF & CC, GoI, Chandigarh on 06.11.2015 and

the report was submitted to M.S, SEIAA on 30.11.2015, wherein it was stated that project

proponent will be submitting an application seeking approval for extension of the validity

period of the EC; whereas in the present case project proponent has submitted application for

Expansion of their project having built up area of 562141.739 sqm. It was observed by the Authority:

[1] The MoEF, GoI granted environmental clearance for development of Group

Housing project having built up area 331520 sqm under item 8 (b) of EIA

Notification vide letter dated 10.04.2007.

[2] As per MoEF, GoI Notification 14.09.2006 and subsequent amendment

29.04.2015 the validity of EC in case of Township/ Area development project

8 (b) the validity of EC is limited only to such activities as may be the

responsibility of the applicant as a developer:

16

[3] It was decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the


(i) Status of the construction achieved with details.

(ii) Whether the construction has been carried out in accordance with the

approved plans or not?

(iii) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing

project.

(iv) Management of Municipal Solid waste.


decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site

for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days

period. Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony

at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for expansion of Group Housing

Colony at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 224719.152 sqm (Existing 111263.082 sqm.

+Expansion 113456.07) (55.52940 Acres)

2. Built up area 748942.655sqm (Existing 370035.157sqm +

Expansion 325891.407sqm )


4. Proposed project Residential building, commercial area,

comprise community centre, primary and nursery

school

6. Height 192.9 Meter(AAI obtained)






12 Power Requirement 21793 KVADHBVN

13. Solid Waste 13788 kg/day (08 nos. of OWC proposed

for 1250 kg/day)

14. ECS 7208 ECS

15. RWH 57 pits



belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-

17 involvement of Aravalli Notification dated 07.05.1992, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The height of the building 192.9 meter. The project proponent is required to

submit fire safety plan showing smooth movement of fire tender within the

project area. [2] It was decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC s

hall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the SEIAA


(i) Status of the construction achieved of existing project with details.

(ii) Status of construction of expansion project if any.

(iii) Whether the construction has been carried out in accordance with the

approved plans or not?

(iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using

treated water.

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing

project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste.

(vii) Reply to the observation raised at point [1] above.


decision the project proponent shall submit reply to the observation raised at sr. no. 1

above and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site

for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days

period. Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed expansion of our IT/ITES

Project, at plot no. 20, Panchkula Technology Park, Sector-22,

Panchkula, Haryana by M/s JSK Multi Projects Pvt. Ltd.

(Formerly known as M/s Kansan News Pvt. Ltd.)


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for expansion of our

IT/ITES Project, at plot no. 20, Panchkula Technology Park, Sector-22, Panchkula,

Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 7463.74sqm(1.84Acres)allotted by

HSIIDC Dated 13.08.2010

2. Built up area 26367.62sqm(Existing17370.03 sqm +

Expansion 8997.59 sqm)

3. Allotment of plot from Plot allotted by HSIIDC

HSIIDC

4. Nos. of Floors Lower Basement + Upper Basement + GF

+08 floors.

5. Height 40 Meter


18





11. Power Requirement 1967.9 KWUHBVN

12 Solid Waste 930 kg/day (02 nos. of OWC proposed for

558 kg/day)

13. ECS 543 ECS

14. RWH 2 pits





etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The information related to sr. no. 21 of Form-I not clear. The project proponent

has not given the nearest location of Wild Life Sanctuary. The project proponent is

required to submit the same.

[2] The information of point no. 8.3 and 9.1 of Form IA not properly replied. The

project proponent required to submit the revised proper details.

[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 6.1 Lt/sqmt of treated water for

landscaping which is on higher side considering surface green area and terrace

green area. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for

horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [4] It was noticed that the project proponent has already constructed 17370.03 sqm of

building. The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is


for building plan of 17370.03 sqm and the construction has been carried out in

accordance with the approved plans. [5] The project proponent is required to submit compliances of the conditions of CTE

and CTO obtained from HSPCB. [6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC s hall




treated water.


project.


(iv) Reply to the observation raised at point [1 to 5] above.

19



raised observation (point no. 1 to 5) within 15 days and Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh.

S.C.Mann Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report

on the points as indicated above within 15 days period. Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex

at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Deepanshu

Projects Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Expansion of Group Housing

Complex at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 59258.025sqm (14.64 Acres)

2. Built up area 158812.61sqm (Existing 148623.86sqm +

Expansion 10188.75sqm )


4. Nos. of Towers 17 Blocks + 02 Basements + Stilt +

GF +21 floors

5. Nos. of DU 738 DU, 132 EWS, 108 Servant units,

6. Height 70.3 Meter (AAI obtained)






12 Power Requirement 5749.58 KWDHBVN


1317 kg/day)

14. ECS 1410 ECS

15. RWH 14 pits



belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Aravalli


etc. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] Different figures of built up area has been given in Form I and presentation copy. The project

proponent is required to clarify the exact proposed built up area of existing project, proposed

under expansion and total built up area after expansion. [2] The project proponent is required to give proper information of point no, 8.3 of

Form IA. [3] The project proponent is required to submit water balance diagram for all the

seasons.

20

[4] The use of 24.3 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is improper. The water

requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of water lost

due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily. The project proponent

is required to properly calculate the water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed


revised water balance diagram. [5] The project proponent has proposed to use 90 KLD of treated water for landscaping


horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram. [6] It has been proposed to discharge 208 KLD of treated water to public sewer/tankers. The

project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid up to date, carrying

capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan. [7] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC



(i) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.

(ii) Status of construction in expansion part if any.

(iii) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using

treated water.

(iv) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing

project.

(v) Management of Municipal Solid waste.

(vi) Reply to the observation raised at point [1 to 6] above.



raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 7 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.

Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the

points as indicated above within 15 days period. Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Boulder, Gravel and Sand” (Minor

Mineral) at Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28 over an area of 23.20 Ha.

inTehsil- Chhachhrauli , Distrct-Yamuna Nagar by Sh.

Karaj Singh.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Sh. Karaj

Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Village- Malikpur

Khadar Block/ YNR B-28, Tehsil-Kalka Chhachhrauli , Distrct-Yamuna Nagar Haryana

over an area of 23.20 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It

was noticed tha t the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 08 years

subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent

21

(LOI) dated 14.09.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 23.20 Ha having Village

Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28. The project proponent on 20.11.2015 submitted online


Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy

NOC from Forest Department. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category

B-1 project as other mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has

been appraised as per proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public

hearing.



2. Location of Project Village- Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28

3. Project Details Khasra No. “Boulder, Gravel and Sand” (Minor Mineral) at Malikpur Khadar Block/ YNR B-28 inTehsil-

Chhachhrauli over an area of 23.20 Ha.

Production capacity 4,00, 000 TPA @ 53 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)




Plantation 6.80 KLD

Drinking 1.20 KLD

6. Environment Management Plan 21.50 lakh

Budget



4,00, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will

be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is

291.85 amsl to 292.2 amsl.


area Block Latitude Longitude

Malikpur 30°15'29"N 77°26 '55"E

Khadar Block/ 30°15'47"N 77°27 '22"E

YNR B-28



I Yr. 500 Trees

II Yr. 500 Trees

III Yr. 500 Trees

IV Yr. 500 Trees

V Yr. 500 Trees



The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day. The

project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,

22

its safe storage and measures for proper handling and management of Diesel/spent

Oil.

[2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease

area to the link road taking into account the load carrying capacity of road in order

to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of

particulate matters viz Wet Scrubber/Filter bags etc. (ii) The project proponent shall provide water curtain technology/efficient sprinkling

system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place. (iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.




days. Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Boulder, Gravel and Sand”

(Minor Mineral) at Pipli Majra Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31 over an area of 18.20 Ha. inTehsil- Chhachhrauli District Yamuna Nagar by Sh. Paramjeet Singh.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to Sh.

Paramjeet Singh for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at PipliMajra

Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31 in Tehsil- Chhachhrauli District Yamuna Nagar over an area

of 18.20 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.


It was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 07

years subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated

14.09.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 18.20 Ha having Village- Pipli Majra

Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31. The project proponent on 20.11.2015 uploaded online


Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been

obtained. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category B-1 project as

other mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been

appraised as per proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public

hearing.


1. Category/Item no. (in 1 (a) B-1

schedule):

2. Location of Project Pipli Majra Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31, Tehsil- Chhachhrauli District Yamuna Nagar

23

3. Project Details Khasra Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral at No. Pipli Majra Block/ YNR B-29, 30 & 31 over an area of

18.20 Ha.

Pipli Majra YNR B-29 6//21/1, 21/2, 7//25,

12//4,4,5,6,7,8/1,8/2,13,14,15,16/1,16/2,17,18,19/1,19/2,

21/1,21/2,22,23,13//1,10,11

Pipli Majra YNR B-30 16//12,13,19,20,21

17//16,17,23,24,25,

Pipli Majra YNR B-31 20//2,3,4,5,9

6//15,16,17,24,25,5//20,21,22,14//1,2,3,10,13//4,5,6/1,6/2,7

Production capacity 370, 000 TPA @ 50 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)

4. Project Cost 1.80 crores

5. Water Requirement & 26 KLD through Tankers

Source Dust suppression 9 KLD

Plantation 6.80 KLD

Drinking 1.20 KLD

6. Environment Management 20.50 lakh

Plan Budget


8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 370, 000

TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be 9 meter. The

alivation range of mine site is 291.85 amsl to 292.2 amsl.

9. Corner Coordinates of the

lease area Block Latitude Longitude

Pipli Majra 30°15'20.5"N 77°26 '29"E

Block/YNR B- 30°15'32.5"N 77°26 '44"E

29

Pipli Majra 30°15'6.5"N 77°26 '43"E

Block/YNR B- 30°15'16.5"N 77°27 '0.5"E

30

Pipli Majra 30°15'26.5"N 77°26 '49"E

Block/YNR B- 30°15'36.5"N 77°27 '02"E

31



I Yr. 500 Trees

II Yr. 500 Trees

III Yr. 500 Trees

IV Yr. 500 Trees

V Yr. 500 Trees



The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day. The

project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,

24


Oil.

[2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease








days. Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for proposed Sand Minor Mineral Mines at

Jaidhar Block /YNR B-34 over an area of 25.60 ha. inTehsil-Chhachhrauli,DistrictYamuna Nagar by M/s Saharanpur Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Saharanpur

Mines Management Services Pvt. Ltd for Mining of Sand Minor Mineral Mines at Jaidhar

Block /YNR B-34 in Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, DistrictYamuna Nagar over an area of 25.60 ha.

by imposing stipulations stated therein.




20.07.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 25.60 ha having Village- Jaidhar Block

/YNR B-34. The project proponent on 23.11.2015 uploaded online application along with

copy of approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the

Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained. The SEAC in its

125th

meeting held on 12.01.2016 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public hearing was

held on 09.04.2016. The study period is 1st

November 2015 to 31 January 2016. Brief details of the project:


2. Location of Project Jaidhar Block /YNR B-34 in Tehsil- Chhachhrauli, DistrictYamuna Nagar

3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Sand Minor Mineral Mines at Jaidhar

Block /YNR B-34 inTehsil-

Chhachhrauli,DistrictYamuna Nagar over an area of

Jaidhar Block /YNR B-34 25.60 ha.

25

27//12,13,14,16/1,16,2,17,18/1,18/2,19,20,21,22,23,

24,25,26//25/1,25,2,33//5,32//1/1,1/2,2,3,4/1,4/2,

4/3,5,6,7,8,9,10,13,14,15,16,17,31//1,2,3,6,7/1,7/2,

8,9,10,11,12/1,12/2,13/1,13/2,14/1,14/2,15

16/1,16/2,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25/1,25/2,43//2,

3,4,4/1,4/2,5,6,

30//11,19,20/1,20/2,21,22,23,44//1,2,3

Production capacity 4,60,000 TPA @ 61 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)

4. Project Cost 9 crores



Plantation 10.00 KLD

Drinking 1.5 KLD


Budget




be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 282

amsl to 283 amsl.



Jaidhar Block 30°13'42"N 77°24'30"E

/YNR B-34 30°13'50"N 77°24'42.5"E

30°13'36"N 77°24'06"E

30°13'44"N 77°24'52.5"E



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees



The recommendation of SEAC and project details as given above was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent has intimated the requirement of Diesel @ 4880 Ltr/day.

The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,


Oil. [2] The project proponent shall submit a plan showing pucca roads from mine lease


to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:

26

(i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of






days. Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for proposed Stone along with Associated Minor

Minerals at Kheribattar Plot 2, over an area of 42.0 HaTehsil-Dadri

District-Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s ASD RKC J.V.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s ASD RKC

J.V. for Mining of Stone along with Associated Minor Minerals at Kheribattar Plot 2,

over an area of 42.0 HaTehsil- Dadri District-Bhiwani, Haryana by imposing stipulations

stated therein.




21.10.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 42.0 Ha having Village-Kheribattar Plot

2. The project proponent on 30.11.2015 submitted online application along with copy of

approved Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan

is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted copy NOC from Forest Department. The

SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a) as category B-1 project as other mine lease

area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been appraised as per proper

procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public hearing. Brief details of the project:


2. Location of Project Village- Kheribattar Plot 2, Tehsil-Dadri District- Bhiwani, Haryana over an area of 42.0 Ha.

3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Stone along with Associated Minerals

“Kheribattar Plot 2”, over an area of 42.0 Ha

Khasra no.139, 140 & 141 min

Production capacity 81,66,000 MT/Year (27220 Ton/day)


27



Plantation 4 KLD

Drinking 2 KLD

6. Environment Management Plan 54 lakh

Budget




First 381,372,363,354,336,327 70 lakh MT

Second 327, 318, 309, 300 70 lakh MT

Third 300, 291, 282 75 lakh MT

Fourth 282 & 273 80 lakh MT

Fifth 264 & 255 81.66 lakh

MT



I Yr. 700 Trees

II Yr. 700 Trees

III Yr. 700 Trees

IV Yr. 700 Trees

V Yr. 700 Trees











to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent in the proposed crushing plan has proposed to provide sprinkling

water system or putting ceil on the “Transfer Points” to arrest the fugitive particles is not

proper/justified. The project proponent is required to install

APCM i.e. Dust Suppression/Dust Extraction Systems. The project proponent is

required to submit the same [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of


system wherever loading/transfer of material taking place.

28

(iii) They will provide water trough near the weigh bridge for washing of tyres.

After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of

SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions as category B-2 in

view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 subject to satisfactory reply to the below


Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral Mines of “Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” over an area of 48.60 Ha. inTehsil Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar by M/s P.S.Buildtech.


P.S.Buildtech for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” in Tehsil Chhachhrauli District-Yamuna Nagar over an area of 48.60

Ha. by imposing stipulations stated therein.




30.11.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 48.60 Ha having Village- Jaidhari

Block/YNR B 33. The project proponent on 04.01.2016 uploaded online application along


the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained. The SEAC

in its 125th

meeting held on 12.01.2016 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public hearing

was held on 23.05.2016. The study period is December 2015 to February 2016. Brief details of the project:


2. Location of Project “Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” in Tehsil Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar

3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral

at “Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33” in Tehsil

Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar over an area

of 48.60 Ha.

Jaidhari Block/YNR B 33 31//4,5,6,7,14,15,16/1,16/2,17,24,25,

32//1 to 9,11 to 16,18 to 25,

33//1,2,3,4/1,4/2,5,6,7/1,7/2,8,9,10,11/1,11/2,12,13,

14/1,14/2,15,16,17/1,17/2,18,19,20,21/1,21/2,22,23,

24/1,24/2,25/1,25/2,25/3

34//1,2,9,10,11,12,19,20,21/1,21/2,22,

41//4,5/1,5/2,6,7

19//21/22,

20//21,22,23,24,25,

21//21,22,23,24,25,

22//24,25,

38//1/1,1/2,2/1,2/2,9/1,9/2,10,11/1,11/2,

12/1,12/2,19/1,19/2,20,21,22,

39//1 to 17,24,25,

50//4,5,6,7,14/15,

51//1,2,9,10,11,12

29

Production capacity 9, 10,000 TPA @ 121 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)




Plantation 13 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD


Budget




be 9 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 275

amsl to 284 amsl.



Pipli Majra 30°13'58"N 77°25 '30"E

Block/YNR B- 30°14'25"N 77°26 '05"E

29



I Yr. 600 Trees

II Yr. 600 Trees

III Yr. 600 Trees

IV Yr. 600 Trees

V Yr. 600 Trees












After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing

30 the conditions subject to satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15 days.

Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for proposed Stone along with Associated Minor Minerals at ‘Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’ over an area of 11.26 Ha. in Tehsil - Narnaul, District Mahendergarh Haryana by M/s Madaan Associates.

The SEAC has recommended to accord Environment Clearance to M/s

Madaan Associates for Mining of Stone along with Associated Minor Minerals at ‘Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’over an area of 11.26 Ha. in Tehsil - Narnaul, District Mahendergarh

Haryana by imposing stipulations stated therein.


was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 10 years

subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 24.07.2015. The

lease has been granted for an area of 11.26 Ha having Village-Bakhrija (Plot-1). The project

proponent on 17.06.2016 submitted online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan

under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project

proponent has submitted copy NOC from Forest Department. The SEAC has appraised this project

under category 1(a) as category B-1 project as per the prevalent procedure at that time. No other

mine lease area is also located within 500 meter. The project proposal has been appraised as per

proper procedure of EIA Notification i.e. approval of TOR and Public hearing.


1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1 (now B2 as per amended Notification)

2. Location of Project Village- Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’ in Tehsil - Narnaul, District Mahendergarh Haryana over an area of

11.26 Ha.

3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Stone along with Associated Minerals

“Bakhrija (Plot-1)’’”, over an area of 11.26 Ha

Khasra no.69,70,71,72,80 min and 81 min

Production capacity 20, 00, 000 TPA, daily 30 nos. of dumper @ 25 MT

capacity




Plantation 12 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD

6. Environment Management Plan 25 lakh

Budget


31



First 348 to 337 (part) 19.99 Lakh Ton

Second 337 (part) to 331 19.99 Lakh Ton

Third 325 to 319 20.01 Lakh Ton

Fourth 313 to 307 20.01 Lakh Ton

Fifth 310 to 295 20.02 Lakh Ton



I Yr. 200 Trees

II Yr. 200 Trees

III Yr. 200 Trees

IV Yr. 200 Trees

V Yr. 200 Trees











to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent in the proposed crushing plan has proposed to provide

sprinkling water system or putting ceil on the “Transfer Points” to arrest the

fugitive particles is not proper/justified. The project proponent is required to install

APCM i.e. Dust Suppression/Dust Extraction Systems. The project proponent is

required to submit the same [4] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that: (i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of



After detailed deliberation, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of

SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the conditions as category B-2 in

view of the amended Notification dated 15.01.2016 subject to satisfactory reply to the below


32

Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for River Bed Mining of Sand minor mineral “Mandoli Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-4” at Village

Mandoli, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar over an area of 25.56 Ha by M/S JSM Foods Pvt. Ltd

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s JSM

Foods Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, Village Mandoli,

Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-4, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar over an area of 25.56 Ha





19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 25.56 Ha having Village-Mandoli

Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-4. The project proponent on 17.06.2016 uploaded online



obtained. The EAC, MoEF on 18.09.2015 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public

hearing was held on 26.04.2016. The study period is 1st

October to 31st

December 2015.



2. Location of Project Village Mandoli, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar

3. Project Details Khasra No. River Bed Mining of Sand minor mineral at over an

area of 25.56 Ha

“Mandoli Ghaggar West 53//5,6,15,16/1,16/2,25

Block/YNR B-4” 54//1 to 25

55//1,2,9,10,11,20

57//1 to 4, 7 to 13

58//5,6,15

Production capacity 11, 91, 000 TPA @ 159 Trips/day (25 Ton/Trip)




Plantation 3 KLD

Drinking 2.77 KLD


Budget


8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 11, 91, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be

3 meter. The alivation range of mine site is 268

armsl to 272 armsl.

33



“Mandoli 30°08'12"N 77°25 '01"E

Ghaggar West 30°08'28"N 77°25 '21"E

Block/YNR B-

4”



I Yr. 800 Trees

II Yr. 800 Trees

III Yr. 800 Trees

IV Yr. 800 Trees

V Yr. 800 Trees




[1] The project proponent is required to explain in detail the source of procurement,










days. Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for River Bed Mining of minor mineral

“Mandoli Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-3” at Village Mandoli, Tehsil

& District Yamunanagar over an area of 20.18 Ha by M/S JSM

Foods Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s JSM

Foods Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, Village Mandoli

Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-3, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar over an area of 20.18 Ha


34

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was

noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 10 years subject to

the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 19.06.2015. The lease has been

granted for an area of 20.18 Ha having Village-Mandoli Ghaggar West Block/YNR B-3. The project

proponent on 17.06.2016 uploaded online application along with copy of approved Mining Plan

under category B-1. The validity of Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from

Forest Department has been obtained. The EAC, MoEF on 18.09.2015 approved the TOR for EIA

study. The public hearing was held on 12.05.2016. The study period is 1st

October to 31st

December

2015. The SEAC has appraised this project as category B-1 as per the procedure prevalent at that

time. No other mine lease area is located within 500 meter.


1. Category/Item no. (in 1 (a) B-1

schedule):

2. Location of Project Village Mandoli Ghagga, Tehsil & District Yamunanagar

3. Project Details Khasra No. River Bed Mining of Sand minor mineral at over an area

of 20.18 Ha

“Mandoli Ghaggar West 52//2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,13,14,15,16,17,18,23,24,25

Block/YNR B-3” 53//1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24

58//1,2,3,4,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,18,19,20

59//3,4,5,6,7,8,13,14,15,16,17,18



5. Water Requirement & 52.82 KLD through Tankers

Source Dust suppression 6.82 KLD

Plantation 4 KLD

Drinking 5 KLD

6. Environment Management 11.80 lakh

Plan

Budget


8. Production The proposed production for the five years is @ 8, 50, 000 TPA. The ultimate depth of Mining will be 3 meter.

The alivation range of mine site is 269 armsl to 273

armsl.

9. Corner Coordinates of the

lease area Block Latitude Longitude

“Mandoli 30°08'10"N 77°24 '41"E

Ghaggar West 30°08'28"N 77°25 '01"E

Block/YNR B-

3”

35



I Yr. 800 Trees

II Yr. 800 Trees

III Yr. 800 Trees

IV Yr. 800 Trees

V Yr. 800 Trees













the conditions as Category B-1 in view of the amended Notification subject to

satisfactory reply to the below mentioned observation within 15 days. Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for proposed Boulder, Gravel and Sand

Minor Mineral Mines of “Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5” at Village

Kanalsi, Tehsil Jagadhri over an area of 44.14 Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar by M/s P.S.Buildtech.


P.S.Buildtech for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at “Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5” in Tehsil Jagadhri , District-Yamuna Nagar over an area of 44.14 Ha.



was noticed that the Mines and Geology Department has granted lease for a period of 09 years

subject to the terms and conditions as indicated in Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 30.11.2015. The

lease has been granted for an area of 44.14 Ha having Village- Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5. The

project proponent on 23.06.2016 uploaded online application along with copy of approved

Mining Plan under category B-1. The validity of

36

Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. NOC from Forest Department has been obtained.

The EAC, MoEF on 08.02.2016 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public hearing was held on

23.05.2016. The study period is December 2015 to February 2016.



2. Location of Project “Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5” in Tehsil Jagadhri , District-Yamuna Nagar

3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral over an area of 44.14 Ha.

Kanalsi Block/YNR B-5 41//16,24,25

42//16 to 19,20,21,22 to 25

43//16,17 to 24,25

44//1,10,11,12,19,20,21,22

45//1,2,3 to 8,9,10 to11,12,13 to 18,19,20 to

21,22,23 to 24,25/1,25/2

46//1 to 21,24,25

47//3,to 7,7/1,7/2,8,9 min,11min,12 to 25

48//16 min,24 min, 25

52//4 min,5,6,7,15

53//1,2,3,4/1,4/2,5,7,8 to 13, 19





Plantation 14 KLD

Drinking 6 KLD


Budget




amsl to 276 amsl.



Kanalsi 30°08'09"N 77°24 '00"E

Block/YNR B- 30°08'31"N 77°24 '46"E

5



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees



37












days. Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for mining of (Boulder, Gravel & Sand) at

Yamunanagar-Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1 located at Bailgarh Village, Chhachhrauli, Tehsil-Yamunanagar with production capacity of 2.14 Million TPA (ROM) in lease area of 44.0 hac by M/s Celleis Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance to M/s Celleis

Realtech Pvt. Ltd. for Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral, at Village-

Yamunanagar-Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1, Tehsil-Yamunanagar over an area of 44.0

Ha. by imposing stipulations stated therein.




19.06.2015. The lease has been granted for an area of 44.0 Ha having Village-Yamunanagar-

Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1. The project proponent on 04.01.2016 uploaded online



obtained. The EAC, MoEF on 24.09.2015 approved the TOR for EIA study. The public

hearing was held on 26.04.2016. The study period is October to December 2015. Brief details of the project: 1. Category/Item no. (in schedule): 1 (a) B-1

38

2. Location of Project Yamunanagar-Bailgarh North Block/YNR-1,

Tehsil-Yamunanagar

3. Project Details Khasra No. Mining of Boulder, Gravel and Sand Minor Mineral over an area of 44.0 Ha.





Plantation 3 KLD

Drinking 3 KLD


Budget




amsl to 302 amsl.



Yamunanagar- 30°14'40.7"N 77°30 '56.1"E

Bailgarh North 30°14'37.4"N 77°31 '00.8"E

Block/YNR-1 30°14'27.6"N 77°31 '01.7"E

30°14'12.4"N 77°30 '53.7"E

30°14'04.0"N 77°30 '45.4"E

30°14'03.8"N 77°30 '43.2"E

30°14'06.1"N 77°30 '41.0"E

30°14'14.2"N 77°30 '36.0"E

30°14'21.0"N 77°30 '35.0"E



I Yr. 1000 Trees

II Yr. 1000 Trees

III Yr. 1000 Trees

IV Yr. 1000 Trees

V Yr. 1000 Trees

11. Machinery required Excavator/ JCB Tipers/Trucks, Water Tanker Light Vehicles/Geep and Maintaniance Van






to reduce the dust emissions. [3] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking with the declaration that:

39

(i) They shall adopt latest Air Pollution Control Measures for suppression/extraction of






days. Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance proposed Commercial Warehousing Project at village-

Kishrora, Sonepat, Haryanaby M/S Agson Global Pvt. Ltd.

The representation received from M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd requesting SEIAA

to consider their request for deemed clearance on the basis of NGT order passed in this case

enclosed with representation and details given in the office note was taken up for consideration

in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the applicant has contended that their Project Proposal

qualifies for deemed clearance as per the provision prescribed in para8 (iii) of EIA notification

14.09.2006 as no decision was communicated to the Project Proponent within 45 days of

recommendation of SEAC. The opinion of ADA of the Department of Environment was also

obtained.

After detailed deliberation it was decided to call the authorized

representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next meeting to justify

their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.

Additional Agenda Items:

Permission of Chair was obtained to take up the cases deferred in the last meeting

to consider their replies.

Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony “Nimai Familia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

This case was deferred for want of more information in the 94th

meeting of SEIAA

held on 11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the

observations raised by SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed that the report sought from Sh.

Hitender Singh, Arch. is still awaited. Accordingly, the case was deferred for want of report

from Sh. Hitender Singh, Arch. Member, SEAC.

40

Item No.[28] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of “Group Housing Colony” at Sector-7A, Village-Dharuhera, Rewari, Haryana by M/s Dream Merchant Promoters Pvt. Ltd.


meeting of SEIAA held

on 11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations

raised by SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The project proponent shall submit copy of EDC. [2] The project proponent shall submit an undertaking to increase the irrigation

efficiency from 75% to 80%.




within 15 days. Item No.[29] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at

village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd.


meeting of SEIAA held

on 11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations

raised by SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that: [1] The information provided for point no. 8.3 and 9.1 is again incomplete. The

project proponent is required to resubmit the complete information in respect of

the same. [2] The project proponent has proposed to supply treated water to the nearby sites for their

construction and also proposed to discharge the excess of treated water in the HUDA

sewer line. The proponent is required to submit clear cut proposal. If the proposal is to

supply excess of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction then the project

proponent is required to submit MOU/Agreement with the site owners or the project

proponent shall submit copy of IDC paid up to date, location of HUDA sewer line on the

plan and its carrying capacity.

In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised observation within 15 days period to all the members of SEIAA. Item No.[30] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex “Orris Market

City” at Village-Hayatpur & Badha, Sector-89 & 90, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Orris Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.


meeting of SEIAA held on

11.08.2016. The project proponent on 24.08.2016 submitted the reply to the observations raised by

SEIAA. The reply submitted by project proponent was taken up

41

for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed by the Authority that the site

visit report submitted by sub-committee indicated that the project proponent has not

started construction of the existing project at site. It was observed that the project

proponent has proposed irrigation efficiency is up to 75%. A decision was taken that the

project proponent shall submit an undertaking to increase the irrigation efficiency from

75% to 80%.



subject to the satisfactory submission of the clarification on the above raised observation

within 15 days.

*******

1

Minutes of the 96th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on. 22nd September, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.

The following attended the meeting of Authority:

1. Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA

2. Dr. Punit Ghai, Member SEIAA At the outset it was noticed that M.S.SEIAA did not attend the meeting. However

it was decided to take up the cases recommended by SEAC for Environmental Clearance

or otherwise as listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No. 804-806 dated

19.09.2016. Following decisions were taken:- Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex

project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016.

It was observed that M/s Ramprastha Estates Pvt. Ltd. has sold the land of commercial

area under consideration for environmental clearance to M/s JMS Buildtech Ptv. Ltd. and

M/s JMS Buildtech pvt. Ltd. has approached SEAC and submitted fresh application in

the name of JMS Buildtech for appraisal by SEAC during the 137th meeting of SEAC.

The SEAC giving reference of Town & Country Planning Department letter no.

MISC.2213/SD(BS)/2015/1142 dated 20.01.2015 has informed that the Town & Country

Planning Department allows approval of building plans in cases where even license is not

valid, but third or fourth party rights have been created and in this case also the third

party rights have been created. The SEAC referred this case to SEIAA for taking a

decision to the effect whether environment clearance can be considered in such cases in

the absence of valid license. The above observations of SEAC were taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting. It was observed that:

1. The Town & Country Planning letter reference of which is given in the

proceedings has got no relevancy in the present case. In either case whether M/s

Ramprasta Estate or M/s JMS Buildtech the valid license is required for

consideration of the project proposal. However in the present case if the project

proponent/licensee is able to submit proof of having submitted the application for

validity of license along with all the supporting documents i.e. license fee,

EDC/IDC etc. the application for environment clearance can be considered

provided the project proponent submits an undertaking for submission of valid

license before the start of construction.

2

2. The licensee M/s Ramprasta Estate is responsible to provide internal infrastructure

i.e. services lines and road within the zoned area as EDC/IDC are being paid to the

concerned quarter by M/s Ramprasta Estate. Therefore in the present case the

services lines in the commercial belt proposed to be developed by M/s JMS

Buildtech shall also be laid by M/s Ramprasta Estate. The Ramsprasta Estate

cannot provide all these internal services without obtaining prior environmental

clearance as the project area is more than 50 hac.

3. M/s JMS Buildtech shall clearly explain that the commercial project is

independent entity having independent system of the disposal of treated waste

water, laying of dual plumbing lines and sewer line and the services lines are not

integrated with the plotted colony. The project proponent shall also submit

assurance of treated water supply for construction, fresh water supply for drinking

purpose and disposal of sewer in the public drain in the name of JMS Buildtech.

In view of the above it was decided to refer this case to SEAC with the advice to

consider the proposal in the light of above observations of SEIAA.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Colony at

Village-Daultabad, Sec-103, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s JMK Holdings Pvt. Ltd.



[1] The project proponent has not suggested environmental safe guards for the safety /

protection of proposed building structure keeping in view the depth of ground

water table at 4 meter in his reply. The SEAC has also not reported the same in the

recommendation. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [2] The project proponent has not given the detail of breakup of water requirement for

construction. The project proponent is required to submit the same. [3] The project proponent is required to give the specifications/dimensions of the area

reserved for setting up of STP and OWC as the same has not been given in the

reply. [4] The project proponent shall submit authenticated proof/MOU for supply of 399

KLD of treated water to the nearby sites for their construction. [5] The water requirement for horticulture @ 9 lt./sqm is on the higher side. The

project proponent is required to revise the same and also to submit revised water

balance diagram. The Project Proponent vide letter dated 06.09.2016 submitted the reply which was

discussed in the today’s meeting .It was observed that the project proponent has

suggested in detail the environmental safeguards for the safety and protection of proposed

3

building considering depth of ground water table at 4mt., breakup of water requirement

for construction has been given. The Project Proponent has given

specifications/dimensions of area reserve for STP/OWC, copies of EDC and revised

water balance diagram.


SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the following

conditions in addition to usual condition in practice.

[1] The project proponent shall ensure that the plinth level of the building block to be

1.5 meter above 100 years flood level of the said Najafgarh Jheel.


Department before the start of construction, regarding possible adverse effect of

project proposal on the said Najafgarh Jheel.

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at village-Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Signature Builders Pvt. Ltd.



[1] The information provided for point no. 8.3 and 9.1 is again incomplete. The

project proponent is required to resubmit the complete information in respect of

the same. [2] The project proponent has proposed to supply treated water to the nearby sites for

their construction and also proposed to discharge the excess of treated water in the

HUDA sewer line. The proponent is required to submit clear cut proposal. If the

proposal is to supply excess of treated water to the nearby sites for their

construction then the project proponent is required to submit MOU/Agreement

with the site owners or the project proponent shall submit copy of IDC paid up to

date, location of HUDA sewer line on the plan and its carrying capacity.


discussed in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the Project Proponent has now given

complete information in respect of point no. 8.3 and 9.1 of Form 1 and copies of IDC

paid up to date to the concerned Department.


SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition

in practice.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony on an

area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village Mewka, Sector-92,

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd. The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the

construction of commercial colony on an area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village

4

Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of

documents to the members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not

possible for the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the

next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of

documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the

members of Authority.

Item No.[5] Extension of validity period and amendment of EC for const. of Commercial complex cum hotel at village-Hyderpur viran wazirabad,sec-53,Gurgaon by M/S Monika Infrastructure Pvt. Limited.

The SEAC has recommended to grant environment clearance to the project by

imposing stipulations therein. The case was taken up for discussion in the today’s

meeting. It was observed that the project proponent has submitted application for

extension of validity of environment clearance granted to their project by MOEF GOI on

30.10.2007 which was valid up to 29.10.2012. The project proponent has achieved

construction 46901.36 sqmt against total proposed built up area of 49345.39 sqmt.

It was noticed that the Project Proponent could not construct the area as proposed;

the remaining unconstructed area could not be further developed as the Environmental

Clearance expired on 29.10.2012. However the project proponent submitted fresh

application seeking environment clearance for remaining unconstructed area. The sub-

committee of SEAC also visited the site and reported that the project proponent did not

carry out construction after the expiry of validity of EC but failed to report whether all

the environment conditions/environmental safeguard during construction period of

already constructed project were complied with by the project proponent or not? In view of the above it was decided to defer this case with the decision that the Sh.

Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection

to check the compliance of conditions/environmental safeguard (construction phase) of

already granted environment clearance letter and shall submit the report within 15 days

period.

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15

acres in the revenue estate of Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the

construction of Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15 acres in the revenue estate of

Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies

of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not

possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the

5




Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari, Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.


construction of expansion of Group Housing Colony located at Village-Sahbajpur

Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies

of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not

possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the




Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony Project located at Village-Naurangpur, Sector-80, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s R.P.Estates Pvt. Ltd.



observations:



management of solid waste not earmarked on the plan. [ii] The height of the proposed building 93.45 Meter. The Structural stability

certificate not obtained. [iii] The License is valid up to 07.12.2015. The project proponent is required to submit

validated license. The Project Proponent vide letter dated 09.08.2016 submitted the reply which was

appraised by SEAC in the 140th meeting held on 09.09.2016 and again recommended the

project for environment clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the


the usual conditions in practice.

Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP Project at Village

Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana by Public

Health Engineering Division, Kurukshetra,

The project proponent submitted application on 26.02.2015 for seeking

environment clearance for the project as indicated in the subject. The proposal was

6

transferred to MoEF & CC, GoI on 27.03.2015. No action was taken and the case was

returned to SEIAA on 31.08.2015 after its constitution. The SEAC in its 140th meeting

held on 09.09.2016 and referred to SEIAA to seek clarification whether this project is

covered under Category 7(h) i.e. CETP or STP.

The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was observed

that: i. The project proponent has conducted EIA study and submitted the analysis reports

issued by HSPCB and other NABL approved labs. In view of the above it was decided that the SEAC should appraise and

recommend the case on the basis of analysis reports of HSPCB lab and/or any other

NABL accredited lab submitted by the project proponent.

Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex

“Corona Optus” located at revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Corona Housing Pvt. Ltd.


construction of expansion of Group Housing Complex “Corona Optus” located at

revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex was taken

up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has

failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence

of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly,

the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to

supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended

their case to all the members of Authority.

Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony (14.30 Acres) at Village-Harsaru and Hayatpur, Sector-89 A, Gurgaon by M/s Vatika Limited.



observations.

[i] Since the height of building is 64.60 meter hence clearance from the recognize





[ii] The SEAC shall ensure that the solid waste generation calculation and parking




7

showing area ear marked for composting. [iii] As per point no. 31(vi) of checklist, the project proponent is required to submit an

undertaking stating that: “Provision for Helipad shall be made as the height of

building is more than 60 meter. Provision of at least one Hydraulic ladder for high

rise building shall also be made”. [iv] The project proponent shall submit latest undertaking on non judicial stamp paper


project proponent shall also submit latest photograph of site. [v] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing area ear marked for

composting.


appraised by SEAC in the 140th meeting held on 09.09.2016 and again recommended for

environment clearance. The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in

the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC

to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions in

practice.

Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for proposed Commercial Warehousing Project at village- Kishrora, Sonepat, Haryana by M/S Agson Global Pvt. Ltd

The representation received from M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd requesting

SEIAA to consider their request for deemed clearance on the basis of NGT order passed

in this case enclosed with representation and details given in the office note was taken up

for consideration in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 wherein it was

decided to call the representative of the project proponent in the next meeting for

providing facts of the case with proper justification.

In the today’s meeting the representative of the project proponent appeared

before the Authority and presented the copies of the orders passed by NGT in the matter.

The representative of the Project Proponent informed that there case was recommended

for environmental clearance by SEAC in its 72nd meeting held on 27.12.2012 but no

decision was conveyed to the project proponent within 45 days.

In view of the above discussions the Authority agreed to review its decision

taken in 53rd meeting held on 15.06.2013 and decided that the project proposal qualifies

for deemed clearance after the expiry of 45 days of recommendation of SEAC dated

08.01.2013 for granting environment clearance to the project; in view of para no. 8 (iii

and iv) of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 and also decided that the project proponent

shall comply with the conditions as stated therein in the recommendation of SEAC of

72nd meeting held on 27.12.2012.

8

Additional Agenda Items:

Permission of Chair was obtained to take up the cases deferred in the last meeting

to consider their replies. Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project

at Village Khanpur and Kawarsika, Sector-17, Sohna, Tehsil Nuh,

Mewat, Haryana by M/s Goldsouk Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016.

It was decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. S.C.Mann,

Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report of the

observation of SEIAA within 15 days period. The sub-committee on 22.09.2016

submitted its report and reported that no construction at the site has been carried out by

the project proponent. The reply to the observations of the Authority was also discussed

in detail. It was noticed that the project proponent has given the existing AAQ of project

area, detailed calculations of drinking water for construction workers and its source and

impact on AAQ due to movement of water tankers and mitigation measures suggested for

the same. In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of

SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition

in practice. Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical

University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.

These cases was lastly considered in the 94th meeting of SEIAA held on

11.08.2016 and defer this case with the decision that the project proponent may be asked

to submit MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency within 15

days. The Project Proponent vide letter dated 20.02.2016 submitted the reply to the

observations raised by SEIAA which was not found in order. The Authority was of the

view that M/s S.D. Bio-Medical Waste Management Company has neither obtained

environment clearance under EIA Notification nor applied for environment clearance.

Accordingly, it was decided to defer this case with the advice to the project proponent to

submit MOU with the Bio-Medical Waste Service provider authorized by HSPCB and

having valid environment clearance.

*********

1


held on. 7th October, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS



dated 14.9.2006.

The full Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC for

Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter


Item No.[1] EC for “Ware House” at Village-Lowa Khurd, Dist-Jhajjar, Haryana

by M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to grant Environmental Clearance to the project

was lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and the case was

deferred with the following observations:

[1] The CLU has been granted for setting up of Warehouse on 01.09.2012. The

existing built up area is 15402.3 sqmt and proposed built up area is 18780 sqmt

(total 34182.9 sqmt). It is a case of expansion and not new as indicated in Form-I.

The project proponent is required to rectify Form-I.

[2] The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is


for building plan of 15402 sqmt and the construction has been carried out in

accordance with the approved plans.

[3] It has been proposed to use 4 KLD treated water for curing for expansion of

project but for how much period/days this demand will persist was not clear as

the water requirement for curing is not on daily basis. The project proponent is

required to submit the exact time period during which 4 KLD of treated water

will be required for curing of concrete for construction of expansion and shall

submit revised water calculation.

[4] The water requirement for miscellaneous use in the existing area is shown as 1

KLD whereas use of 5 KLD has been shown after expansion. The project

proponent is required to justify the same as how the water requirement for

miscellaneous use has increased from 1 KLD to 5 KLD.

[5] The project proponent shall submit green belt development plan of existing unit

covering 4594.515 sqm and on 4795.635 sqm proposed under expansion i.e. total

9387.15 sqm.

[6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC shall



2


treated water.


project.


(iv) Observations raised by SEIAA 1 to 5 above.

The project proponent on 12.09.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for


submitted revised Form-I, Consent to Operate and occupancy certificate, details of use of

4 KLD of treated water for curing and green belt development plan of the existing unit.

It was observed by the Authority that the site visit report submitted by sub-committee

indicated that the project proponent has not started construction at site, except old

boundary wall along with the wire fencing, on the date of inspection.



in practice for Ware House Project.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony on

an area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village Mewka, Sector-92,

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd.


by imposing stipulations stated therein was taken up for consideration in the today’s

meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement, quality of water,

green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality etc. It was observed by the Authority

that:

[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.1, 8.3, 9.1, 9.5 and 9.6 of Form-

1A not properly explained.

[2] The project proponent is required to explain and ensure the use of CNG and pool

vehicles (page no. 51 of presentation).

[3] Frequency of AAQ monitoring during Operation Phase not given.

[4] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all the

seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture and road

washing as per prescribed norms.

[5] The project proponent should give exact number of labours to be deployed as

different figures have been given in Form-1.

[6] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of DG/HVAC

system must passed through ‘Cooling Tower ‘ . The location of the same is

not shown on the plan.

3

(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling system.

The entire quantity (22 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity of

treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be

mentioned.

[7] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel requirement,

source of procurement, storage and suggested safety measures.




Item No.[3] Extension of validity period and amendment of EC for const. of

Commercial complex cum hotel at village-Hyderpur viran

waazirabad,sec-53,Gurgaon by M/S Monika Infrastructure Pvt.

Limited.

The recommendation of SEAC to grant Environmental Clearance to the project

was lastly considered in the 96th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.09.2016 and the case was

deferred with the decision that the Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members

SEAC shall visit the site for inspection to check the compliance of

conditions/environmental safeguard (construction phase) of already granted environment

clearance letter and shall submit the report within 15 days period.

The sub-committee on 05.10.2016 submitted the site visit report regarding

compliance of conditions of already granted EC. The sub-committee reported that the

project proponent has given satisfactory report regarding compliance of the

environmental conditions during the construction phase



in practice.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15

acres in the revenue estate of Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.




Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was

observed by the Authority that:

[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.3, 9.1, and 9.7 of Form-1A not

properly explained.




4







mentioned.






Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony

located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari,

Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.






[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 5.3, 5.4 and 8.1 of Form-1A not

properly explained.




[3] The project proponent should give exact number of labours to be deployed as

the same has not in given in Form-1.







mentioned.



[6] The project proponent is required to submit exact green belt area of existing and

proposed for expansion as different figures of green belt area has been given.

5

[7] The project proponent is required to give the stack height ensuring that the same

should be at least 6 meter above the roof level of highest building.




Item No.[6] ] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex

“Corona Optus” located at revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C,

Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Corona Housing Pvt. Ltd.






[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 5.4, 8.1, 8.3 and 9.1 of Form- 1A not

properly explained.






[4] The project proponent should clarify the technology/system to be adopted for DG

cooling as water cooling system and Radiator cooling system (page no. 19) has

been proposed in different chapters.

[5] The project proponent required to give the exact units of power backup as

different figures have been given in the documents (page 20 & 25).







The SEIAA in its 94th meeting held on 11.08.2016 decided to refer this case to

SEAC for appraisal and recommendation on merit as per procedure prescribed in the

Notification and time to time guidelines issued by MOEF & CC, GOI on the basis of

report of the sub-committee reporting that a temporary structure of 209 sqmt has been

raised by the project proponent after seeking the approval of STP Gurgaon and this

structure is not the part of actual building plan. The temporary shed on the right side of

corner where a liquor vend is operational is not the part of the project. Some portion of

the site was found excavated but no sign of any work in foundation was noticed and no

6

material was stored at the site. The sub-committee reported that some portion of site was

excavated but safely construed that there is no violation.

The SEAC in its 141st meeting held on 27.09.2016 considered the matter as

referred by SEIAA and has again recommended this case for prosecution as the project

proponent has violated the EIA notification by carrying out excavation and construction

of RCC Pucca structure as indicated in both the site inspection reports.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up in the today’s meeting for

consideration. After detailed deliberations it was decided to refer back the case to SEAC

with the advice to appraise this case on merit and send its recommendations to the

SEIAA within stipulated period as prescribed in the Notification.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for proposed Multilevel car parking project

at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Interntional Infrabuild Pvt.

Ltd.


construction Multilevel car parking project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up

for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has

failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of Authority and in the absence

of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to consider the case. Accordingly,

the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice to the project proponent to

supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which the SEAC has recommended

their case to all the members of Authority.


Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.


construction of “Affordable Group Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C,

Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed

that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of

Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to

consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice

to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which

the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.

7

Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet”

project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.


construction of “Motel with Banquet” project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil

& District Gurgaon, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It

was noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the

members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the

Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting

with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the

basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.


at Sector-89, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Fidato Buildcon Pvt. Ltd,

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance subject to

compliance of conditions stated therein. The project proponent has proposed the

construction of Group Housing Project at Sector-89, Faridabad, Haryana as under:





4. Nos. of Towers 9 towers, GF+ Max.14 Floors

5. No. of Units 916 DU

6. Height 42 Meter






12 Power Requirement 4150 KVA DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 2342kg/day (OWC 1177 kg/day)

14. ECS 1437 ECS

15. RWH 16 pits








[2] The project proponent shall submit the plan showing location of cooling tower.

8




[4] The project proponent is required to give the exact stack height ensuring that the

same should be at least 6 meter above the roof level of highest building.







Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of STP Project at Village

Narkatari, Tehsil: Thaneshwar, Distt Kurukshetra, Haryana by

Public Health Engineering Division, Kurukshetra,

The matter was lastly taken up for consideration in the 96th meeting of SEIAA

held on 22.08.2016 for giving clarification to the SEAC whether this project is covered

under Category 7(h) i.e. CETP or STP. It was decided that the SEAC should appraise and

recommend the case on the basis of analysis reports of HSPCB lab and/or any other

NABL accredited lab submitted by the project proponent.

The SEAC in its 141st meeting held on 27.09.2016 apprised the EIA study report

submitted by project proponent and observed that as per analysis reports there is no

mixing of Industrial effluent and recommended this case for granting Environmental

Clearance by imposing conditions stated therein.


meeting. After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to accept the recommendation

of SEAC to grant environmental clearance to the project by imposing the conditions as

recommended by SEAC.

Item No.[13] EC for proposed expansion of our IT/ITES Project, at plot no. 20,

Panchkula Technology Park, Sector-22, Panchkula, Haryana by M/s

JSK Multi Projects Pvt.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord Environmental Clearance the case was

lastly considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016 and the case was

deferred with the following observations:

[1] The information related to sr. no. 21 of Form-I not clear. The project proponent

has not given the nearest location of Wild Life Sanctuary. The project proponent

is required to submit the same.

[2] The information of point no. 8.3 and 9.1 of Form IA not properly replied. The

project proponent required to submit the revised proper details.

9

[3] The project proponent has proposed to use 6.1 Lt/sqmt of treated water for

landscaping which is on higher side considering surface green area and terrace

green area. The project proponent shall revise the water requirement for

horticulture and submit the revised water balance diagram.

[4] It was noticed that the project proponent has already constructed 17370.03 sqm of

building. The project proponent is required to justify that the existing structure is


for building plan of 17370.03 sqm and the construction has been carried out in

accordance with the approved plans.

[5] The project proponent is required to submit compliances of the conditions of CTE

and CTO obtained from HSPCB.

[6] It was also decided that Sh. R.K. Sapra and Sh. S. C. Mann, Members SEAC s

hall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit report to the



treated water.


project.


(iv) Reply to the observation raised at point [1 to 5] above.

The sub-committee on 22.09.2016 visited the site and submitted the report along

with the copy of reply submitted by the project proponent on the observations raised by

SEIAA. The sub-committee report and reply was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project proponent has submitted revised Form-I,

Water balance diagram etc. It was observed by the Authority that as per site visit report

submitted by sub-committee the project proponent has not started construction of

expansion project at site.



in practice for Ware House Project.

*****

1


held on. 05thDecember, 2016 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS



dated 14.9.2006.





University” located at Village NunaMajra, District Jhajjar, Haryana

by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.

This case was considered in the 96th meeting of SEIAA held on 22.09.2016 and

the case was deferred with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit

MOU with authorized Bio-Medical Waste Management Agency. The project proponent on 28.10.2016 submitted the reply which was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the Bio-Medical Waste

Management Agency contracted by project proponent has only applied for Environment

Clearance. As per the Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment Facility Guidelines issued

by Central Pollution Control Board on dated 12.07.2016 at para no. 5.2 is clearly

mentioned that the CBWTF operator is also required to obtain “Environmental Clearance

(EC)” from the respective SEIAA or Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change

(MoEF & CC). Until or unless EC is not obtained by the Bio-Medical Waste

Management Agency, the same cannot transport/dispose the Bio-medical/Hazardous

Waste.

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case with

decision that project proponent should either submit the MOU agency which has EC or

shall have in-house facility as per para 5.2 of CPCB Guidelines.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex

at Village-Naknaula, Sector-86, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Deepanshu

Projects Pvt. Ltd.


the case was deferred with the following observations:

[1] Different figures of built up area has been given in Form I and presentation copy.

The project proponent is required to clarify the exact proposed built up area of

existing project, proposed under expansion and total built up area after expansion.

2

[2] The project proponent is required to give proper information of point no, 8.3 of

Form IA.


seasons.

[4] The use of 24.3 KL of treated water for DG cooling per day is not justifiable. The

water requirement for DG cooling is not to be replaced daily rather quantum of

water lost due to evaporation during processing is to be replenished daily to the

extent it is evaporation. The project proponent is required to properly calculate the

water losses due to evaporation as per prescribed formula and resubmit the

revised treated water requirement for DG cooling and also revised water

balance diagram.




[6] It has been proposed to discharge 208 KLD of treated water to public

sewer/tankers. The project proponent is required submit copies of EDC/IDC paid

up to date, carrying capacity of sewer line and location of public sewer on plan.

[7] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra, Members SEAC


SEIAA within 15 days.

The project proponent submitted the reply on 07.09.2016 and the sub-committee

on 07.09.2016 submitted the site visit report. In view of the report submitted, the

Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment

Clearance to this project by imposing the usual conditions in practice.


located at Village-Sahbajpur Khalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari,

Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.


the case was deferred.


consideration in the today’s meeting and it was further found that the reply submitted are

incomplete and the Authority decided defer the case with the following observations.

[1] The project proponent shall submit water balance diagram, Annex.2 Fig 2(a), 260

KLD of treated water may be required initially and 14 KLD from Cooling tower

would remain in circuit, hence 246 KLD would be required next time.

[2] 500KVA DG air cooled may be installed to conserve water.

[3] The project proponent shall submit the location of the “Cooling Tower” on plan.

Observation 4 is regarding location of cooling tower of DG sets not for DG sets.

3

[4] Water getting evaporated is 3KLD from cooling of DG sets but diesel required is

just 1000lts/day, both are dependent on running hours of DG sets, may be

mismatch explained.

[5] Safety measures taken for the transportation &storage of Diesel, be discussed.

Quantity given may be revised.




Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for proposed Multilevel car parking project

at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s International Infrabuild Pvt.

Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Multilevel car parking

project at Sector-29, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 7769.95sqm. (1.92 Acres)


3. Nos. of Floors 2 Basements + GF + 4 Floors

4. Nos. of DU General 1032, EWS 183 , Service personal

108


6. Green belt 21.5%





11. Power Requirement 1397 KW DHBVN

12 Solid Waste 136 kg/day (OWC proposed for 68 kg/day)

13. Parking 995 ECS

14. RWH 4 pits








the usual conditions in practice.

4


Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed of “Affordable Group

Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 20,234.25 sqm (5.0 acre)



4. Nos. of Plots 6 towers, GF+ 10 Floors, Anganwadi cum

Crech, Commercial & Community Hall

5. Nos. of DU 724 units







12 Power Requirement 2780 KVADHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1682 kg/day (OWC 1177 kg/day)

14. ECS 1093 ECS

15. RWH 05 pits






[1] Capacity of DG sets not matching p.g no.36 v/s 42

[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air borne pollution

which emanates from vehicular activities may be reduced during the construction

phase

[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing reference of

MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be

incorporated ( Table 2.4)

[4] Shown 198 KLD of treated water to be discharged in sewer, location & carrying

capacity of Sewer.

[5] Incorporating the above written observations, the project proponent is required to

submit the water balance diagram for all the seasons.




5

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet”

project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.





circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority that:

[1] Pg. no. 33, per capita demand of water for guest rooms & villas is 320lts & 200lts

per day, on what basis PP has arrived on this quantity, explain

[2] Asking for 15 lts/meal/person extra, on what basis

[3] Asking for 26.13 KLD of fresh water taking 2600 persons for banquet hall/ spa

etc. etc., how did PP arrive on such a high fig.

[4] 40,000Lts/day fresh water for Laundry purposes, explain.

[5] 10KLD fresh water for swimming pool, to replenish or replace? Area & location

of pool on layout to be shown.

[6] 10KLD of fresh water for Filter Backwash, why treated water cannot be used for

Backwash &means of disposal water being used in Filter Backwash , explain.

[7] Location, size & capacity of HVAC cooling tower, needing 151,000lts per day for

replenishment, explain.

[8] Pg.no. 35, Measures to be undertaken to reduce water demand during construction

phase, while part OC has been provided, showing some % of construction is

complete still needing 50,000lts water per day for construction, explain.

[9] Pg.no.43; Location of OWC & composting pit on Lay-out to be shown.

[10] Pg. no. 42: Solid waste generation for hotel rooms is 1.0Kg/person/day & for fixed

population 0.1Kg/person/day, why this anomaly, explain.

[11] Pg. no. 54, diesel consumption 700lts/hr., DG sets meant for stand-by operations,

even if have to run for 4hrs a day need 2800lts diesel per day; storage facility &

the safety measures undertaken.

[12] The water consumption quantity seems to be very much on higher side, PP is

asked to re-submit the water balance diagram for all the three seasons and

accordingly be intimated to CGWB.




6

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing colony at

village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Sterling



stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “expansion of Group

Housing colony at village Naurangpur, Sector -79, Gurgaon , Haryana as under:





Total -169912.215 sqm


4. Nos. of floors &

Blocks

Existing -14 blocks, Basement + GF +14

Floors.

Expansion -2 blocks

Total – 16 Blocks

5. Nos. of Service Units 940 DU + 167 EWS +95 Servant units


7. Green belt 30%




11. STP Capacity 960 KLD (parcel A-600 KLD & parcel B-

360 KLD)

12 Power Requirement 8956 KW DHBVN


1915 kg/day)

14. ECS 1692 ECS

15. RWH 17 pits






[1] The project proponent shall submit copy of re-validated license.



phase, no separate need of water for Tyre washing this way.

[3] 275 KLD (p.g.no. 28) would be discharged in sewer location & carrying capacity

of sewer.

[4] Fig mis-match p.g no. 28/40 v/s 41 pt.2.13.

7

[5] To conserve water during Curing of Concrete Jute sacks may be used which may

provide moist conditions to the concrete for longer duration by retaining water

[6] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture citing reference of MoEF guidelines,

may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be incorporated ( Table 2.4)

[7] Pt.5.1.2 Water Conservation Measures to be incorporated still 135 lpd per capita

water requirement, explain . A new Water Balance diagram taking care of the

above observations for all the three seasons be submitted.

[8] Plantation plan to be shown on lay-out depicting 1255 no. of trees with a canopy

area of 25 sq. mt.

[9] Pg. no. 268, Area required for storage & management of solid waste 645.66 sq.

mt. location on layout plan be shown.




(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution.

(ii) Status of construction of existing project vis-à-vis the approved plans.

(iii) Status of construction in expansion part, if any.

(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of

ground water.

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste.

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation.

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project.

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel.



raised observation from Sr. No. 1 to 9 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.

N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report

on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony at

Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s St.

Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group Housing Colony at

Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryanaas under:





8

4. Nos. of floors 9 Blocks + 2 Basements + GF + 17 Floors,

Nursery school, Commercial, Community

building

5. Nos. of Service Units 632 DU + 112 EWS







12 Power Requirement 6207.5 KW DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 1804 kg/day (2 nos. OWC proposed for

1263 kg/day)

14. ECS 1589 ECS

15. RWH 11 pits






[1] 343KLD of fresh water requirement shown & assurance from HUDA obtained for

420KLD.

[2] Instead of “Tyre Washing” provide Water Troughs at entry & exit of project to

conserve water.

[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing reference of

MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be

incorporated ( Table 2.4)

[4] The calculations shown for Water Demand for Cooling Tower citing reference of

MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system not for DG set cooling

tower.

[5] Running of DG sets shown 2hrs a day (pg. no. 56) and water required for cooling

of DG sets is 16KLD that too in all three seasons; a mismatch and illogical.

Secondly, this much quantity of water may not lost in evaporation, major quantity

still be in circuit

[6] Location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan

[7] The Project Proponent submit a new Water Balance Diagram (for all the three

seasons separately) taking above written observations into consideration

[8] Plantation plan with said no. of trees & canopy area 25 sq. mt be submitted

depicting on the green-area reserved for the same




9

Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Group Housing Complex

“PSA (6 Acre)” Basai at Sector-37C, Manesar, Gurgaon by M/s Prime

IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd.


the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.

1. The project proponent has submitted license no. 64 of 2011 issued by Town and

Country Planning Department for development of group housing colony on an

area of 17 acres.

2. The SEIAA on the same license had already granted environment clearance for

development of 11 acres of licensed area out of total 17 acre of the licensed area to

M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

3. The environmental clearance to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. was

granted on the recommendation of SEAC. The EC letter was issued on

15.04.2014.

4. The AAI clearance submitted by the M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present


5. The approved zoning plan dated 09.03.2012 submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions

Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech

Services Pvt. Ltd.

6. The NOC from DC Gurgaon regarding non applicability of Aravalli Notification

submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present project proponent) is in the

name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd.

7. The EDC/IDC receipt submitted by M/s Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (Present


It was observed by the Authority that this case is not fit for consideration as

SEIAA has already granted environmental clearance on the recommendation of the

SEAC to M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. and all the vital documents submitted

by the project proponent are in the name of M/s Phoenix Datatech Services Pvt. Ltd. to

which EC has already been granted, whereas the application has been submitted by M/s

Prime IT Solution Pvt. Ltd, which is contradictory in terms. It appears that the SEAC has

not considered this fact at all.


the SEIAA, which was considered by SEAC in the 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 and

SEAC refer back to SEIAA for taking further action.

The case was taken up in today’s meeting; due to lack of

appraisal/recommendations of SEAC, it cannot be discussed further. After detailed

deliberations it was decided to refer back the case to SEAC with the advice to appraise

this case on merit and send its recommendations to the SEIAA within stipulated period as

prescribed in the Notification.

10


“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed expansion of Group

Housing Colony “Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana as

under:


1. Plot area Existing - 68063.129 sqm

Expansion -14114.231sqm

Total - 82177.36 sqm. (20.306 Acres)



Total -197135.698 sqm


4. Nos. of floors &

Blocks

Existing -13 blocks, Basement + GF +14

Floors.

Expansion -3 blocks

Total–16 Blocks +Basement +GF+14 Floors

5. Nos. of Service Units 716 DU + 130 EWS +72 Servant units, 2

Nursery School, 2 Commercial Area.








13. Solid Waste 1980 kg/day (2 nos. OWC proposed for

1386 kg/day)

14. ECS 1314 ECS

15. RWH 20 pits






[1] DG sets – 2x600KVA + (3x750 KVA + 2 x 600 KVA); water should be conserved

by having “Air Cooled” or “Cooling Coil” technology instead of “Cooling Tower”

[2] As such Cooling tower is not required and the calculations shown are based on the

MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system.

[3] Even if required location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan



phase

11

[5] Quantity of diesel required during construction & operation phase. Storage plan &

safety measures undertaken

[6] Plantation plan (1929 trees), keeping canopy area 25 sq. mt. may be submitted

with the spacing 2mt X 2mt(pg.no.190)

[7] Water utilization calculation citing reference of MoEF guidelines, may the

recommendation for “Water Use Reduction” be incorporated ( Table 2.4) .

Incorporating all the above said observations(regarding water conservation), new

water balance diagrams for all the three seasons be submitted and satisfactory

reply to other observations be submitted




(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution




ground water


(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel

(x) And any other point which visiting team deem suitable






Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for the “Revision and Expansion of Group

Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111,

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed “Revision and Expansion

of Group Housing Colony” located at Village Chauma, Sector-110A & 111, Gurgaon,

Haryana as under:


1. Plot area Existing – 79824.12 sqm

Expansion -5235.61 sqm

Total – 85059.73 sqm. (21.018 Acres)

12

2. Built up area Existing – 225379.07 sqm

Expansion – 13085.09 sqm

Total -238379.86 sqm

3. License valid up to 24.07.2018

4. Residential Towers (Tower A to G), Community Building

(Tower H1 & H2), Convenient shopping,

Nursery School and EWS block.

5. Nos. of Dwelling

Units

917 DU

6. Height 87 Meter





11. STP Capacity 700 KLD (600 KLD + 100 KLD)


13. Solid Waste 2463.69 kg/day

14. ECS 1668 ECS

15. RWH 23 pits






[1] 20 + 3.33 KLD fresh water for make-up on daily basis. Why fresh water is

required for make-up when treated water is available. Secondly, “Air Cooled” or

“Cooling Coil” technology may be applied to conserve water.

[2] DG sets would be running for quite longer duration as inferred from the quantity of

water required for cooling, how much diesel would be consumed per day?

Necessary Safety measures taken for safe transportation & storage of Diesel.

[3] 8+5 KLD Fresh water for Filter Backwash; why not the treated water & secondly,

where the water used for Filter backwash would go.

[4] Water Balance Diagram for all 3 seasons to be submitted

[5] The project proponent shall submit location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan.

[6] Location & carrying capacity of sewer

[7] Proposed no. of trees 4750 & shrubs 12,241, plantation plan be submitted

[8] Pt.8.1 not explained properly

[9] Pt. 8.3; states F/A will be used in road construction; F/A handling system &

APCM system installed may be shown on plan & be well described




(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution


13



ground water


(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel

(x) And any other point which visiting team deem suitable






Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for Mining of minor minerals “Road Metal

& Masonry Stone” at village Mukundpura, District Mahendergarh,

Haryana by Shri Satish Kumar Garg.


the case was referred back to SEAC with the following observations.

1. The project proponent has not submitted NOC from the Forest Department. The

project proponent on 29.10.2015 submitted letter issued by Mines and Geology

Department indicating that the mine leased area is not a Forest land. The SEAC

should examine the same.

2. The SEAC in its recommendation has given different figures of production. The

lease period is for remaining three years whereas in the conditions the production

figures have been given of year wise up to 5 years and sum of production for the

next five years.

3. The mine lease has been granted for 20 years w.e.f. 20.07.1999 up to 10.07.2019.

Therefore the mine is in operation and it is not a new project. The SEAC should

ensure that the project proponent has already effectively reclaimed/rejuvenate the

already excavated mine lease area by adopting all the environmental safe-guards.

4. The project proponent shall submit an undertaking stating that they have kept-

amount (figures to be given) for reclamation of excavated mine lease area and

shall also ensure that all the environmental safe-guards shall be adopted for

closure of mine.

The Project Proponent submitted the reply to the observations of the SEIAA,

which was considered by SEAC in the 143rdmeeting held on 27.10.2016 and SEAC again

has recommended this case for Environmental Clearance. The recommendation of SEAC

was taken up for discussion in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to agree with

14

the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by

imposing the usual conditions in practice.

Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for “Recreation and Leisure Project” in

village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S DLF Limited.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27.10.2016 has recommended to de-list

this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital

information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In the

absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for the

environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light of

guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-2012.

It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 20.07.2012 submitted

application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Recreation and Leisure

Project” in village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that Shri

S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection

of project on the following point:

(i) Status of construction in the project if any.


decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days period.

Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for “Municipal Solid Waste Management

Facility” at Taraori, Karnal, Haryana by Municipal Committee,

Taraori.

The SEAC in its 143rd meeting held on 27-10-2016 has recommended to de-list







It was noticed that the project proponent on25.11.2013 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the “Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility” at

Taraori, Karnal, Haryana.

After detailed deliberations the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC

with the decision that the SEAC may clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC

should visit the site to check status of construction if any and submit its recommendation

on merits along with the inspection report within stipulated period.

15

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex

at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s BluejaysRealtech Pvt. Ltd.









Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Complex at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon,

Haryana.





Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for National Cancer Institute, AIIMS,

Jhajjar, Haryana by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS).









application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed National Cancer Institute,

AIIMS, Jhajjar, Haryana.The Authority decided that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar

Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:



decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15

days period.

Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for the construction of group housing

project at village- Badshahpur, Sec-66, Gurgaon by M/S Golden Glow

Estates Pvt. Ltd.



16







Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing project at village- Badshahpur, Sec-66,

Gurgaon.





Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project-

EDGE Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s S.A. Infratech Pvt. Ltd.









Environmental Clearance for the Group Housing Project EDGE Towers (Phase-II) At

Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana.





Item No.[19] Environmental Clearance for Construction of Setting up of a Senior

Residential School (Institution) at village Gamdoj, Tehsil Sohna, Dist.

Gurgaon, Haryana by Ms. Bluebells Educational Society.







amended Notification dated 22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and the Authority

17


clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI dated

09.06.2015.

Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for expansion of “Jai ParkashMukund Lal

Innovative Engg. & Technology Institute” at

RadourDistt.Yamunanagar, Haryana by JAI ParkashMukand Lal

Innovative Engineering & Technology Institute.







amended Notification dated 22.12.2014 issued by MoEF & CC, GoI and the Authority


clearance subject to compliance to guidelines issued by MoEF & CC, GoI dated

09.06.2015.

Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing

Colony “Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village

Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana M/s Rurban Development

Corporation Pvt. Ltd.








It was noticed that the project proponent on01.08.2013submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing Colony “Rudco Golf

Greens” located at Revenue Estates of Village Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana.





Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Police at FerozpurNamak Village,

Nuh Taluk Mewat District by Haryana Police Housing Corporation

Ltd.



18







Environmental Clearance for the Residential & Non-residential buildings for Haryana

Police at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat District.





Item No.[23] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential and Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Police at Bahraula Village, Palwal

Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing

Corporation Ltd.








It was noticed that the project proponent on 27.06.2014 submitted application for

Environmental Clearance for the Residential and Non-residential buildings for Haryana

Police at Bahraula Village, Palwal Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana.





Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project

located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana by M/s

Navtech Projects Pvt. Ltd.








19


Environmental Clearance for the Warehouse Project located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas,

District-Rewari, Haryana.





Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for construction of “5 Star Hotel” at Village

Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Munjal Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.









application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “5 Star Hotel” at Village

Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that

Sh. S. N. Mishra and Mr. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the site for

inspection of project on the following point:



decision that Sh. S. N. Mishra and Mr. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC shall visit the


days period.

Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Five Star Hotel” at

Village Prithla, District Palwal, Haryana by M/s SRS Retreat Services

Pvt. Ltd.









application for Environmental Clearance for the proposed “Five Star Hotel” at Village

20

Prithla, District Palwal, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri

Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the

following point:



decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit

the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within

15 days period.

Item No.[27] Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village

Sohna Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing

Corporation.









Environmental Clearance for the expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village Sohna Taluk,

Gurgaon, Haryana.





******

1

Minutes of the 99th meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on. 19th January, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman, SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula, regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006. ……….

The full Authority is present. The project proposals asrecommended by SEAC

for Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide

letter No. 06-08 dated 16.01.2017 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-

Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for the “Maharaja Agrasen Medical

University” located at Village NunaMajra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.

This case was considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on

05.12.2016 and decided to defer this case with decision that project

proponent should either submit the MOU agency which has EC or shall

have in-house facility as per para 5.2 of CPCB Guidelines.

The project proponent on 08.12.2016 submitted the reply which was

taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the

project proponent has not submitted a detailed plan of establishing the

bio-hazardous waste management plant, the technology to be deployed

and its location on the layout plan.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony “NimaiFamilia” at Sector-7, Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s N.B.Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

This case was lastly considered in the 94th meeting of SEIAA held on

11.08.2016. It was observed that the report sought from Sh. Hitender

Singh, Arch. is still awaited. Accordingly, the case was deferred for want

of report from Sh. Hitender Singh, Arch. Member, SEAC.

The Report is submitted by Mr. Hitender Singh, Arch on 29.11.2016

which is considered in the today’s meeting. On the basis of earlier said

report and detailed reply submitted by the project proponent the

Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord

Environment Clearance to this project.

2

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony at Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarv Realtors Pvt. Ltd.


26.08.2016 and the case was deferred wit h the following decisions:

[1] The height of the building 192.9 meter. The project proponent is required

to submit fire safety plan showing smooth movement of fire tender within

the project area.

[2] It was decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members

SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of the project and shall submit

report to the SEIAA within 15 days on the following points:

(i) Status of the construction achieved of existing project with details.

(ii) Status of construction of expansion project if any.

(iii) Whether the construction has been carried out in accordance with

the approved plans or not?

(iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by

using treated water.

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the

existing project.

(Vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste.

(VII) Reply to the observation raised at point [1] above.

The sub-committee has submitted the report on 15.12.2016along with the

reply of the project proponent the Authority deferred this case with the

decision that as the report has not been sent to Member, SEIAA thus

needs more time to study the report and reply submitted.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony on an area of 2.5 acres in the revenue estate of Village Mewka, Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd.


07.10.2016 and the case was deferred with the following observations:

3

[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.1, 8.3, 9.1, 9.5 and 9.6 of

Form- 1A not properly explained.

[2] The project proponent is required to explain and ensure the use of CNG

and pool vehicles (page no. 51 of presentation).

[3] Frequency of AAQ monitoring during Operation Phase not given.

[4] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all

the seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for horticulture

and road washing as per prescribed norms.

[5] The project proponent should give exact number of labours to be

deployed as different figures have been given in Form-1.

[6] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of

DG/HVACsystem must passed through ‘Cooling Tower’. The location of

the same is not shown on the plan.

(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling

system. The entire quantity (22 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity

of treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be

mentioned.

[7] The project proponent is required to give the quantity of diesel

requirement, source of procurement, storage and suggested safety

measures.

The Project Proponent submitted the reply on 15.12.2016 which is

considered in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in

detail and found the following observations:

[1] The project proponent may explain the fly ash handling system and APCM

to be installed on the site.

[2] Annexure 1 of the reply shows the capacity of DG Sets 1010 & 625 KVA,

whereas annexure-(IV)shows 1010/380/250 KVA a mismatch. The project

proponent may explain the mismatch.

[3] The DG sets of capacity 380 KVA & 250 KVA can be aircooled or may

have “cooling Coil” technology to conserve the water. Thus, PP is

suggested to install air cool or cooling coil technology for the DG sets.

[4] Annexure 4 shows the “Soft water Requirement”, The project proponent

may explain the means, methods and technology deployed to produce

soft water and asked to explain:

4

(i) Location of the softener

(ii) Re-usability/treatment/disposal of the reject of softener.

[5] The project proponent has shown the requirement of 5 KLD of treated

water for road washing which may not be a regular phenomenon, thus pp

is asked to explain the need of this much quantity of water.

In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the

recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent

submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It

was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all

the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the

office.

Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony on an area of 3.15 acres in the revenue estate of Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd.



[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 8.3, 9.1, and 9.7 of Form-

1A not properly explained.

[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for

all the seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for

horticulture and road washing as per prescribed norms.

[3] (i) The asked quantity of treated water required for cooling of

DG/HVAC system must passed through ‘Cooling Tower ‘ . The location

of the same is not shown on the plan.

(ii) There must be evaporation or certain other losses in the cooling

system. The entire quantity (20 KLD) would not vanish. Thus the quantity

of treated water required for replenishment on daily basis should be

mentioned.



measures.

5




[1] The project proponent has said under Point No. (8.3) that fly ash will be used;

PP is asked to explain the fly ash handling system and APCM to be installed on

the site.

[2] The Form 1A shows the following installation of DG sets

Block A:- 2*1010 KVA and 1*625 KVA

Block B:- 2*625 KVA with such capacity of DG sets if running in even at half of

the load DG sets would be consuming more than 670 Ltr/hr. that seems to be

less considering the capacity of DG sets installed. Reply to observation 4 may

be substiated with a proper reference.

[3] Even in annexure 4 PP declares 4 hours of running of DG sets/day meaning

thereby 670*4= 2680 ltrs/day of diesel; PP is asked to explain the mode of

transportation, storage and safety measures/permission seems for such quantity

of diesel

[4] Explain the significance of “Air washer for DG sets and restaurants”; how these

would be consuming so much of water quantity.

[5] Annexure 1, shows 4.2 KLD as “evaporation losses”. Would the rate of

evaporation remain constant in all the 3 seasons?

[6] Location and carrying capacity of the sewer.

In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations

of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the

satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also

decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the

members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.


located at Village-SahbajpurKhalsa, Sector-25, district- Rewari, Haryana by M/S Jai Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.


05.12.2016 wherein it was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent shall submit water balance diagram, Annex.2 Fig

2(a), 260 KLD of treated water may be required initially and 14 KLD from

6

Cooling tower would remain in circuit, hence 246 KLD would be required

next time.

[2] 500KVA DG air cooled may be installed to conserve water.

[3] The project proponent shall submit the location of the “Cooling Tower” on

plan. Observation 4 is regarding location of cooling tower of DG sets not

for DG sets.

[4] Water getting evaporated is 3KLD from cooling of DG sets but diesel

required is just 1000lts/day, both are dependent on running hours of DG

sets, may be mismatch explained.

[5] Safety measures taken for the transportation &storage of Diesel, be

discussed. Quantity given may be revised.

The project proponent submitted the reply on 30.12.2016 which is



[1] Query to the reply of observation 2; the case was apprised on the basis of

3500 KVA of installation of DG Sets; now PP is stating to have 6000KVA

of DG sets to be installed, explain.

[2] Query to the reply of observation 5;as per the reply of observation no. 2,

DG sets of 6000KVA would be installed during operation phase and in

reply to observation no. 5 PP states that 6000KVA of DG sets would be

consuming 1000lts/day of diesel; which seems to be less. Such a big

installation would be requiring much more than 1000lts even if DG sets

supposed to run 2hrs/day. The project proponent is asked to explain the

mode of procurement, storage of such quantity of diesel and safety

measures taken. Any statutory obligation to be met.






office

7

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Complex “Corona Optus” located at revenue estate of Village Basai, Sec-37 C, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Corona Housing Pvt. Ltd.



[1] The information asked in respect of point no. 5.4, 8.1, 8.3 and 9.1 of

Form- 1A not properly explained.

[2] The project proponent should submit revised water balance diagram for all

the seasons ensuring the quantum of use of treated water for

horticulture and road washing as per prescribed norms.



measures.

[4] The project proponent should clarify the technology/system to be adopted

for DG cooling as water cooling system and Radiator cooling system

(page no. 19) has been proposed in different chapters.

[5] The project proponent required to give the exact units of power backup as

different figures have been given in the documents (page 20 & 25).




[1] Explain the fly ash handling system and APCM to be installed on the site.

[2] If radiators will be deployed by PP then why need 31 KLD of water to cool

the DG sets. Explain.

In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations

of SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the

satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also

decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the

members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.

8

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Affordable Group Housing” project at Village Basai, Sector-37-C, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s RMG Developers Pvt. Ltd.



[1] Capacity of DG sets not matching p.g no.36 v/s 42

[2] Water trough may be provided at entry & exit of project so that air

borne pollution which emanates from vehicular activities may be

reduced during the construction phase

[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing

reference of MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water

Use Reduction” be incorporated (Table 2.4)

[4] Shown 198 KLD of treated water to be discharged in sewer,

location & carrying capacity of Sewer.

[5] Incorporating the above written observations, the project proponent

is required to submit the water balance diagram for all the seasons.

The project proponent submitted the reply on 30.12.2016 and 13.01.2016

which was considered in the today’s meeting. After detailed deliberation, the Authority

decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance

to this project.

Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for construction of “Motel with Banquet” project (5.323 acres) at Village Bohrakhurd, Tehsil & District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bestech Motels & Resorts Pvt. Ltd.



[1] Pg. no. 33, per capita demand of water for guest rooms & villas is 320lts &

200lts per day, on what basis PP has arrived on this quantity, explain

[2] Asking for 15 lts/meal/person extra, on what basis

[3] Asking for 26.13 KLD of fresh water taking 2600 persons for banquet hall/

spa etc. etc., how did PP arrive on such a high fig.

[4] 40,000Lts/day fresh water for Laundry purposes, explain.

9

[5] 10 KLD fresh water for swimming pool, to replenish or replace?Area &

location of pool on layout to be shown.

[6] 10 KLD of fresh water for Filter Backwash, why treated water cannot be

used for Backwash &means of disposal water being used in Filter

Backwash , explain.

[7] Location, size & capacity of HVAC cooling tower, needing 151,000lts per

day for replenishment, explain.

[8] Pg. no. 35, Measures to be undertaken to reduce water demand during

construction phase, while part OC has been provided, showing some %

of construction is complete still needing 50,000lts water per day for

construction, explain.

[9] Pg. no.43; Location of OWC & composting pit on Lay-out to be shown.

[10] Pg. no. 42: Solid waste generation for hotel rooms is 1.0Kg/person/day &

for fixed population 0.1Kg/person/day, why this anomaly, explain.

[11] Pg. no. 54, diesel consumption 700lts/hr., DG sets meant for stand-by

operations, even if have to run for 4hrs a day need 2800lts diesel per day;

storage facility &the safety measures undertaken.

[12] The water consumption quantity seems to be very much on higher side,

PP is asked to re-submit the water balance diagram for all the three

seasons and accordingly be intimated to CGWB.




[1] Query to the Reply to observation no. 5:

Approximately 6 to 7 mm of water persq.mt.of cross-sectional area of

swimming pool is lost due to evaporation.The rate of evaporation definitely

decreases during the winter & rainy season. Revised water balance

diagram shows the same quantity; therefore, pp is asked to revise and re-

submit the water balance diagram.

10


PP has not explained, “The means of disposal of water being used for

filter backwash”.


Same quantity of water would not be needed to replenish during winter &

rainy season. Secondly, the HVAC system may not be required to run

for the same tenure as in summer.


50 KLD means 50,000 lt./day, How much quantity of brick

work/concreting/curing, would be done from the day one and the rate of

progress would remain constant by engaging, how many labours? The PP

is asked to submit the number of labours to be deployed and

settlements at the site.


Reply as per annexure 4 is not satisfactory. Please refer Petroleum and

explosive Act for storage & transportation of petroleum products i.e.

diesel.

[6] Query to the Reply to observation no. 12

The PP has taken permission to draw ground water for CGWB vide letter

no. 1&2 dated 03.03.2014 of 340 Lt./minute & 345 lt./minute, respectively

for 9 hour/day; total quantity of water to be extracted on this basis would

be 369.9 Kl/day. Now vide letter no. nil dated 22.12.2016. PP has

intimated M.S. CGWB, to extract 310.09, 291.09 and 282.59 KLD

depending on the season. These bore wells would be the only source of

fresh water for the project. Gurgaon being a water scarce zone every step

should be taken to conserve water & reduce the consumption. PP must

install meters to measure the output of bore wells & must keep a record of

the same as the consumption of water in this project isoccupancy

dependent the record must be kept to correlate the same.

11






office.

Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Colony at Sector-32, Village Dhunela, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s St. Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.



[1] 343KLD of fresh water requirement shown & assurance from HUDA

obtained for 420KLD.

[2] Instead of “Tyre Washing” provide Water Troughs at entry & exit of

project to conserve water.

[3] Water utilization calculation for Horticulture & Cooling Tower citing

reference of MoEF guidelines, may the recommendation for “Water Use

Reduction” be incorporated (Table 2.4)

[4] The calculations shown for Water Demand for Cooling Tower citing

reference of MoEF guidelines which are for “Air Conditioning system not

for DG set cooling tower.

[5] Running of DG sets shown 2hrs a day (pg. no. 56) and water required

for cooling of DG sets is 16KLD that too in all three seasons; a

mismatch and illogical. Secondly, this much quantity of water may not

lost in evaporation, major quantity still be in circuit

[6] Location of the Cooling tower may be shown on lay-out plan

[7] The Project Proponent submit a new Water Balance Diagram (for all the

three seasons separately) taking above written observations into

consideration

[8] Plantation plan with said no. of trees & canopy area 25 sq. mt be

submitted depicting on the green-area reserved for the same

12




[1] Annexure-6 of the reply to the observation raised in 98th meeting canopy

area 25 sqmt & spacing 2x2 mts is a mismatch. 25 sqmt. area means

2.8 mts of radius; hence spacing would be at least 2.8+2.8= 5.6 mts.

Revisit and resubmit the reply.






office.

Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance construction of proposed New police line situated in Zila Jail, Karnal, Haryana by M/s Haryana Police Housing Corporation.

The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 has recommended to

de-list this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to

provide the vital information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various

letters and final notice. In the absence of the vital information it was not

possible to appraise the project for the environmental clearance.

The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the

light of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII

(Part) dated 30-10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide

letter dated 28.07.2014 submitted application for Environmental

Clearance New police line situated in Zila Jail, Karnal, Haryana.The

Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members

SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:


(ii) Justifiable reason to seek the de-listing of the project.

13

In view of the above discussions the Authority decided to defer this case

with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above


Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential Plotted Colony located at Village Jaroda and Jewarhari, District Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s S.N.Realtors Pvt. Ltd.


de-list this case on the grounds that the Project Proponent has failed to provide the vital





light of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-

10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated

01.09.2014submitted application for Environmental Clearance for construction of

Residential Plotted Colony located at Village Jaroda and Jewarhari, District Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra,

Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:







Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Construction of factory,

located at Plot No. 10, Sector-5, Growth Centre [Now known as IMT Bawal], Bawal, District Rewari, Haryana by M/s Pearl Global Industries Ltd.




14





10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 21.10.2014

submitted application for Environmental Clearance for Construction of factory, located

at Plot No. 10, Sector-5, Growth Centre [Now known as IMT Bawal], Bawal, District

Rewari, Haryana.The Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra,








Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for proposed Institutional Project “PrannathParnami University” located at Chaudhariwas, Hisar, Haryana by MRS Shree PrannathParnami Education Society.








10-2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated

11.11.2014submitted application for Environmental Clearance for proposed Institutional

Project “PrannathParnami University” located at Chaudhariwas, Hisar, Haryana.The

Authority decided that Mr. Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N.Mishra, Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:



15





Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for mining of Gypsum (Minor Minerals) at

Saharwa, Dariyapur and GaranpurKalan over an area of 10.20 Ha. in District Hisar and Bhiwani by M/s Joginder Enterprises.


Joginder Enterprises for mining of Gypsum (Minor Minerals) at Saharwa, Dariyapur and

GaranpurKalan over an area of 10.20 Ha. in District Hisar and Bhiwani by imposing


1. The project proponent submitted application on 16.09.2016 for seeking

environment clearance for the project as indicated above.

2. The SEAC in its 145th meeting held on 29.11.2016 recommended this

project for environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-2

project.

3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by

Mines and Geology Department Haryana for mining of Stone along with

associated minor minerals of Saharwa, Dariyapur and GaranpurKalan

over an area of 10.20 Ha. in District Hisar and Bhiwanifor a period of 10

years vide letter dated 22.06.2016.

4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan,

NOC from Forest Department.

5. The proposed production is 38,000 MTPA for first 10 years. The water

requirement is 18 KLD.

6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 200 saplings every year

for first 5 years along the roads, in barren area.

The recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in the

today’s meeting. In view of the above discussions, the Authority decided to agree with

the recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project by

imposing conditions.

16

Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for setting up Commercial Complex (3.8625 Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Commander Realtors Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance

subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Commercial

Complex (3.8625 Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon,

Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 15635.568 sqm (3.8625 Acres)



4. Amenities Office complex, 3 level of basements







11. Power Requirement 3823.50 KVA DHBVN

12 Solid Waste 744 kg/day (01 nos. of OWC proposed for 438.96 kg/day)

13. ECS 556 ECS

14. RWH 04 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in

the today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,




[1] At. 3; Pg. No. 39, of presentation “Minimization of water consumption” stating

sweep with a broom & pan to be used for cleaning of the road still needing 13

KLD for “Road Maintenance” that too for rainy & winter season.

[2] Water balance diagram shows 29 KLD of treated water for Horticulture

remaining constant in all the three seasons. Definitely the water requirement for

horticulture will go down during raining and winter season.

[3] The water balance diagram shows daily requirement of 5 KLD for water body

but it has to be replenishment not the replacement.

17

[4] 3 x 1500 KVA DG Sets for stand-by purposes;how do these the requiring 45

KLD of treated water for cooling purposes? Location of the cooling tower of DG

sets may be shown of the layout plan.

[5] On Page. No. 8 ofForm IA; 729.8 Ltrs of diesel per hour is required for the

running of DG Sets. Even if DG sets to run 4 Hrs/day the quantity required

would be approximately 2900 ltrs/day means to procure, store & safety

measures undertaken and any statutory obligation to be met; explain.

[6] Water requirement shown for chillers etc. seems to be very much on higher

side; water is required to replenish not to replace; substantiate with proper

calculations.

[7] PP may incorporate the recommendations of MOEF for water use reduction &

may submit separate water balance diagrams for all the three season.


with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply

to the above raised observation within 15 days period.

Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Project located at

Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, Haryana by M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance

subject to stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Group

Housing Project located at Village Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh

Complex, Haryanaas under:





4. Amenities 02 Basements, Convenient shopping

5. Nos. of DU 76 General DU, 08 Service personal units and 14 EWS units,

6. Height 43.13 Meter (AAI obtained)








18

14. ECS 290 ECS

15. RWH 03 pits

The above recommendation of SEAC was taken up for consideration in

the today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,




[1] Abstract of the report submitted to SEAC for approval of Group Housing

Colony” shows 2 x 380 KVA of DG sets; whereas reply submitted on 29/11/16

(pg. no. 8) shows 1 x 100 KVA requiring 1 KLD of water for cooling.

[2] The 100 KVA and380 KVA DG sets can be air cooled , thereby, needing no

water for cooling purposes.

[3] On the Page. no. 87 of Form IA; landscape area 3183.252 sqmt. Reply

submitted on 29/11/16 pg. no. 8 shows either 2652.71/ or 3522.88 sqmt

which is correct?

[4] Water being a scarce resource must be conserved; PP may incorporate the

recommendations of MOEF (Table 2.4: Estimation of water Use Reduction)

[5] Pt. 8.1; Form IA; not explained properly.

[6] Water required for horticulture cannot be same in all three seasons. The

separate water balance diagram for all the three seasons may be

resubmitted while incorporating all that is suggested to reduce the water

consumption.

[7] Under pt. 8.3; PP states that Fly ash would be utilized in road construction,

PP is asked to explain the type, capacity & technology employed for Fly ash

handling system & APCM to be installed to control fugitive emissions while

using Fly ash.

[8] Pt. 9.1; What is the energy consumption assumed per sqft of built up area; not

mentioned.


with the decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply

to the above raised observation within 15 days period.

******

1


held on. 1st March, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.





University” located at Village Nuna Majra, District Jhajjar, Haryana by Maharaja Agrasen Hospital Charitable Trust.

The case was considered in the 99th meeting of SEIAA held on 19.01.2017 and the

case was deferred.


consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in


[1] The pp should ensure that proposed Bio-medical Waste processing unit is at least

500 mt away from any inhabited area and an undertaking in this regard be

submitted.

[2] The proposed measures for mitigation of air pollution be submitted.

[3] Methods and means of disposal of ash and disposal of scrubber water (if any) be

submitted.

[4] The odor control measures proposed be submitted.


SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory

clarification to the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the

project proponent shall supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA

and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued by the office.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed “Expansion of Group Housing

Complex” at Sector-3, Bahadurgarh, Haryana by M/s Ruhil Promoters

Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s Kashi Promoters Pvt. Ltd.).

The case was considered in the 95th meeting of SEIAA held on 26.08.2016. The

Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that the PP may be asked to submit

satisfactory reply and Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.

The project proponent on 26.09.2016 and site visit report on 17.02.2017 submitted

the reply which was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority

studied and discussed the reply in detail and found the following observations:

2

[1] The PP should incorporate the recommendations of MOEF for “Water use

Reduction” as in table 2.4

[2] The PP has shown 35 KLD of water for DG set cooling out of which 4 KLD

would be residual/or waste water; plan to treat the same be explained. The PP

should also explain how to dispose/handle the waste/reject generated during the

treatment of such water.






Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony at

Village Badshahpur, Sector-68, District Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sarv

Realtors Pvt. Ltd.






recommendations of SEAC and with the site visit report to accord Environment

Clearance to this project.








As per the site visit report freshly excavated soil has been kept under tarpaulin

whereas the PP has assured in Form 1A that the excavated top soil cover would be kept

separately as temporary soil bank to use the same for horticulture/landscaping; PP must

explain the absence of the top soil cover.

In view of the site visit report and the above written observation the case has been

deferred for want of reply from project proponent.


“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.



3



As per the site visit report freshly excavated soil has been kept under tarpaulin

whereas the PP has assured in Form 1A that the excavated top soil cover would be kept

separately as temporary soil bank to use the same for horticulture/landscaping; PP must

explain the absence of the top soil cover.

In view of the site visit report and the above written observation the case has been

deferred for want of reply from project proponent.

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Colony at

Sector-48, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sweta Estates Pvt.

Ltd.


Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S.

N. Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report.

Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up area; as per

notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC, GoI.

Item No.[7] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing Project located at Village

Lakkarpur, Sector-39, Faridabad-Ballabgarh Complex, Haryana by

M/s Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.



asked to submit satisfactory reply.




[1] The pp should submit an undertaking to install air cooled DG sets of 380 x 2

KVA.

[2] The pp should incorporate the MoEF & CC, GoI guidelines for ’”water use

reduction “ as given in table 2.4 and resubmit the water balance diagram.

[3] The pp should explain what is assumed power consumption per.sq.ft. of area.






4

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for setting up Commercial Complex (3.8625

Acres) at Sector-63 A, Village Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s Commander Realtors Pvt. Ltd.



asked to submit satisfactory reply.




[1] The pp was supposed to show the size of the water body and the quantity of water

required to replenish.

[2] The water loss due to evaporation/drifting etc. in the cooling tower may lead to

increase in:”TDS” in the residual water. PP should explain the methods and means

to treat this water and handle/dispose the rejects thus obtained.

http://www.cumminsindia.com/documents/dbu/genset_installation_recommendati

on.pdf

[3] The pp may submit an affidavit that the necessary permissions/clearances would

be obtained from the concern Authorities for storage of diesel and will take all

the necessary safety measures.

[4] The PP should submit a’ “schematic plan” showing how to treat the residual

water in the circuit of DG set cooling along with the plan to handle/dispose the

rejects so obtained.




Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for commercial complex project – Spaze

Buziness Park, Sector-66, Village- badshahpur, District-Gurgaon by

M/S KAY KAY Designer Towers Pvt. Ltd.

This case was considered in the 83rd meeting of SEIAA held on 28.09.2015

wherein, the Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC.

In the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed the reply in detail and

found the following observations:

The PP should explain the following:

Form 1A

Pt. 8.33 – PP States to us Fly Ash in building Structure; how to procure; handle &

mitigate air pollution.

Pt. 9.1 – What is the energy consumption assumed per square feet of built-up area?

Pt. 9.5/9.6 – Not explained/replied properly

http://www.cumminsindia.com/documents/dbu/genset_installation_recommendati%09on.pdf

http://www.cumminsindia.com/documents/dbu/genset_installation_recommendati%09on.pdf

5

Pt. 9.7 – Are you using CFC & HCFC free chillers? Provide Specifications

Water Balance Diagram:

12.6 KLD of treated water for DG Sets cooling which is on the higher side and pp

should show the location of the cooling tower in the lay out plan.

Does the discharge of STP needs further treatment to make it suitable for the

cooling tower?

What are the most likely characteristics of Water available & desired

characteristics of inlet water of “Cooling Towers”? How PP is planning to treat the

available water to match the required properties of inlet water of cooling towers.

Secondly, if water has to be treated to reduce TDS/Hardness/or some other

undesired component, how PP is planning to handle/dispose off the rejects/waste

of such treatment? Provide the “Schematic Plan” of the same.

Road washing cannot be regular phenomenon requiring 8.59 KLD of water,

explain.

What about winter & rainy season; when water requirement for horticulture would

be less? Provide separate “ Water Balance Charts” for the season

Diesel

PP states 500 Ltr./Hrs of diesel is required for DG Sets; for even 6 Hrs of

operation 3000 Ltr/Day of diesel; how to transport; store and safety measure

proposed to store and handle the fuel.

The pp may submit an affidavit that the necessary permissions/clearances would

be obtained from the concerned Authorities for storage of diesel and will take all

the necessary safety measures.




Item No.[10]Environmental Clearance for Mining of Stone along with associated

minor minerals at Jojhu Kalan, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani,

Haryana having area of 6.00 ha. by M/s MSK-JV.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Mining of

Stone along with associated minor minerals at Jojhu Kalan, Tehsil-Dadri, District-

Bhiwani, Haryana over an area of 6.00 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.



2. The SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 16.12.2016 recommended this project for

environment clearance under category 1(a) at category B-2 project.

3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Mines and

Geology Department Haryana mining of Stone along with associated minor

6

minerals at Jojhu Kalan, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana for a period of

10 years vide letter dated 11.04.2016.

4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from

Forest Department.

5. The proposed production is 11,00,000 TPA for first 5 years. The water


6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 200 saplings every year for first 5

years along the roads, in barren area.


meeting. It was observed by the Authority that:

Form 1

Pt.3.8.1

Type & layout of “Dust Suppression System” requiring 15 KLD of water be

explained

How to suppress or minimize the fugitive particles going to atmosphere during

transferring or loading operations of minerals?

Water trough be provided at entry & exit to wash the tyres of vehicles & mining

machines

Pt. 2.6

Storage of diesel & related safety measures, provide details

Safe distance between magazine & diesel storage, provide details

To prevent spillage of “Diesel” & “Spent Oil” measures suggested?

Pt.7.2

Design & drawing of Septic tank/soak pit be shown & how does domestic/office

effluent be treated in individual septic tank (pt.4.2)






Item No.[11]Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Group Housing Project in

located at Shikhopur, Sector-77, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Emaar

MGF Land Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Expansion of Group

Housing Project in located at Shikhopur, Sector-77, Gurgaon, Haryana.



7

Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex

project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon,


The case was taken up by the SEIAA in its 96th meeting held on 22.09.2016 and

refer back this case to SEAC.


found the following observation:

[1] The PP should submit the copy of renewed license along with the definite proof of

EDC/IDC deposited.




Item No.[13]Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio Medical Waste

Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, Village

Bazida Jatan, near railway crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal,

Haryana by M/s. Haat Supreme Wastech Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for TOR subject to stipulation stated

therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Common Bio Medical Waste Treatment

Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, Village Bazida Jatan, near railway

crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal, Haryana.

In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the SEIAA approved the

“Terms of Reference” as appraised by the SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 14.12.2016; in

the mean while project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and

regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR

studies.

Item No.[14]Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste

Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1

kite. No 50, Tadadi No 314, village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala,

District Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Esskay Hygienic Services.


therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment

Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1 kite. No 50, Tadadi No 314,

village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala, District Panchkula, Haryana.


“Terms of Reference” as appraised by the SEAC in its 146th meeting held on 14.12.2016; in

the mean while project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and

regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR

studies.

8

Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing

Colony located in the revenue estate of Village Bhatola, Sector-85,

Faridabad, Haryana by M/s VRP Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.




environment clearance in the following terms.





4. Nos. of Towers 07 residential Towers + Basement + Stilt +

Max. 14 floors, commercial area,

Anganwadi/crèche and community hall

5. Height 49 Meter








13. ECS 375 ECS and 730 for two wheelers

14. RWH 06 pits



[1] The PP is asked to submit fresh water balance diagram of all 3 seasons

incorporating the recommendations of MoEF for water reduction as in table 2.4

and pp is further asked to revisit the shown requirement of 7 lt. per sqmt of water

for horticulture.

[2] Form 1A

Under point 8.3, PP has mentioned, “Portland Cement” as recyclable material

(page no. 45); explain.

Under point 9.1; what is the energy consumption assumed per sqft. of built up area

not explained.





and after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.

9

Item No.[16]Environmental Clearance for Expansion of “DLF Cyber Park” in

Udyog Vihar, Sector 20, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DLF Cyber City

Developers Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Expansion of “DLF Cyber

Park” in Udyog Vihar, Sector 20, Gurgaon, Haryana.



Item No.[17]Environmental Clearance for proposed River Sand (Minor Mineral)

Mining Project for River Yamuna in “South Block/YRN B17”

(21,88,008 TPA), ML area 49.67 Ha Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Jagadri

District -Yamuna Nagar, Haryana by M/s Elite mining corporation.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for River Sand

(Minor Mineral) Mining Project for River Yamuna in “South Block/YRN B17”

(21,88,008 TPA), ML area 49.67 Ha Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Jagadri District -Yamuna

Nagar, Haryana by imposing stipulations stated therein.



2. The SEAC in its 133rd meeting held on 05.05.2016 approved the TOR for EIA

study. The public hearing was held on 19.08.2016. The study period December

2015 to February 2016 and One month additional study in month May 2016 as per

suggest SEAC, Haryana.




Geology Department Haryana for mining of Stone along with associated minor

minerals of River Yamuna in “South Block/YRN B17” (21,88,008 TPA), ML area

49.67 Ha Village-Gumthala, Tehsil-Jagadri District -Yamuna Nagar, Haryana for

a period of 09 years vide letter dated 30.11.2015.


Forest Department.

6. The proposed production is 21,88, 008 TPA for first 5 years. The water

requirement is 11.45 KLD.





10

[1] The pp should submit the arrangement to be made to ensure that no seepage of

diesel/spent oil would take place.

[2] The pp should submit the plan for transportation and storage of diesel and related

safety measures.

[3] The pp should submit a plan to ensure that no fugitive emission would take place

due to plying of vehicles/movement of machineries.






Item No.[18]Environmental Clearance for Modification & Expansion of

Commercial Complex Project (12.206 Acre) located at Sector-16,

Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Brahma Centre Development Pvt. Ltd.






1. Plot area Existing 52123.51 sqm Mod./Expansion -

2727.965 sqm Total 49395.545 (12.206

Acres)

2. Built up area Existing 160708 sqm Expansion 58860.243

sqm Total 219568.243 sqm.

3. License Allotment letter by HSIIDC Dated

11.06.2010

4. Amenities IT/ Office building, Retails/ Shops Food

court and Auditorium







11. Power Requirement 12.871 MW DHBVN


13. ECS 2697 ECS

14. RWH 12 pits (6 nos. of pits with dual bore)



CTE expired on 09.09.2016

The PP is asking for 1792 ML of water for construction (‘ML’ stands for million

liters) . Provide the daily requirement linked to volume of construction in phased

manner

11

Water Balance Diagram

PP is proposing to use 256 KLD & 80 KLD of “Fresh water” for HVAC cooling &

DG Cooling respectively. The pp must use the treated water for the cooling of

HVAC and DG sets.

How PP is planning to treat the available water to match the required properties of

inlet water of cooling tower. Secondly, if water has to be treated to reduce

TDS/Hardness/or some other undesired component, how PP is planning to

handle/dispose off the rejects/waste of such treatment?

The entire quantity of water may not evaporate in the said cooling towers; residual

water would be having high concentration of salts; how does PP contemplate to

treat this water? How the residual or rejects would be handled/disposed off?

How would the water generated through “Filer Back Wash” be treated?

Water requirement for cooling of DG sets and HVAC has shown to remain

constant during all the three seasons; explain.

Incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use Reduction” as in table

2.4.

The pp after making the necessary amendments in the water balance diagram;

should submit separate water balance diagram for each season.

PP has suggested 1 tree/80 Sq. Meter citing MOEF guidelines whereas in some

other cases the SEAC has appraised on the basis of canopy area of 25 sqmt per

tree.

Form – 1A

Pt. 8.1; not explained properly

Pt. 8.3; what about the debris or the other construction waste to be generated

during the execution of the project?

Pt. 9.1; what is the energy consumption assumed per square foot of built-up area?

Pt. 9.7; sates that it is a commercial complex & will be centrally air-conditioned;

would these be CEC & HCFC free, explain?

Quantity of the top soil excavated or to be excavated? And its storage

D G Sets:

PP has proposed to install 9 DG sets (7x2000 KVA + 2x1010 KVA) as standby &

made the water requirement on the basis of assumption of 8 Hrs. per day running,

thereby generating a good quantity of spent oil/black oil; its storage/disposal be

explained.

The quantity of the diesel required its transportation/storage and related safety

measures to be undertaken and pp should submit an affidavit regarding obtaining

the required clearances/permissions from the concerned authorities and

undertaking all the safety measures.

12






Item No.[19]Environmental Clearance for expansion of Piyala LPG Plant at Piyala,

Near Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

The SEAC was taken up this case for appraisal in the 147th meeting of the SEAC

held on 31.01.2017 and recommended to SEIAA for exemption of the case.

In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority decided to call

the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next

meeting to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.

Item No.[20]Environmental Clearance for mining of Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2,

Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-Bhiwani,

Haryana by M/s United Mining Corporation.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the mining of

Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2, Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-

Bhiwani, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed

that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the members of





Item No.[21] Environmental Clearance for Revision/Expansion for Group Housing

Project “Regency Park” at Sector 11 A & 17, Hisar, Haryana by M/s

Hisar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.







2. Built up area Existing 135581.9 sqm. Revision-7073.181

sqm. Total 128508.719

3. License 29.11.2017

4. Towers 8 towers + EWS + Villas + Schools

(G+S+13)




8. Fresh Water KLD


13

10. STP Capacity 520 KLD + 50 KLD

11. Power Requirement 5450 KVA DHBVN


13. ECS 1275 ECS

14. RWH 9 pits



Water Balance diagram:

o May incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use Reduction”

as in table 2.4

o PP has given a constant demand of 7 Ltr./Sq. mtr. for horticulture but the

demand of water for horticulture & landscape would be different in

different season i.e. summer, winter & rainy season.

o The pp should submit separately the revised water balance diagram for all

the three seasons after making the necessary amendments.

Form 1 A

Pt. 8.1/8.3/9.1 are not explained properly






Item No.[22]Environmental Clearance for Revision/Expansion of Residential

Plotted Colony “Sushant City” at Village Rasoi, District Sonepat,

Haryana by M/s Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Revision/Expansion of

Residential Plotted Colony “Sushant City” at Village Rasoi, District Sonepat, Haryana.



Item No.[23]Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste

Treatment Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz Ka Meo Industrial

area, Sohna, Mewat, Haryana by Synergy Waste Management Pvt.

Ltd.


therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste Treatment

Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz Ka Meo Industrial area, Sohna, Mewat, Haryana.

In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority decided to

“Terms of Reference” approved by the SEIAA as appraised by the SEAC in its 147th

meeting of the SEAC held on 30.01.2017.

Item No.[24]Environmental Clearance for construction of “shopping complex” at

14

Block-H, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Natural Product

Bio-Tech Ltd.


environment clearance for the project as indicated above. Due to the lapse term of

SEIAA/SEAC the case could not be appraised and transferred to MoEF & CC,

GoI. No action taken by MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was returned to SEIAA

after its reconstitution.


environment clearance on the following terms.


1. Plot area 8012.763 sqm.

2. Total Built up area 20408.213 sqm

3. License


5. Amenities Service apartments, shops, Offices and fine

dining

6. Green belt 25.20






12. ECS 234 ECS

13. RWH 2 pits




Water Demand for the cooling Tower of HVAC

The pp has shown that 9 KLD of “Fresh Water ” and 24 KLD of, “Treated

Water” will be required for HVAC cooling; evaporation/drifting etc. would result

in to water loss which may lead to increase in, “TDS” in the residual water a,

Schematic plan” be submitted showing the treatment of such water and

handling/disposing the rejects thus obtained.

8 KLD for “Filter Back Wash” how this water will be treated & how the

rejects/wastes would be handled?

May incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on water us reduction as in table

2.4

PP may resubmit “ Water Balance Chart” separately for every season different

seasons after making the required amendments/corrections




15



Item No.[25]Environmental Clearance for construction of Plotted Township namely

“Suncity Township” at Sector-34, 35 & 36, Village Bohar and Pada,

District Rohtak, Haryana by M/s Suncity Builldcon Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed construction of Plotted

Township namely “Suncity Township” at Sector-34, 35 & 36, Village Bohar and Pada,

District Rohtak, Haryana.



Item No.[26]Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Project at

Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Ramprastha Sare Reality Pvt.

Ltd.


environment clearance for the project as indicated above. Due to the lapse term of

SEIAA/SEAC the case was transferred to MoEF & CC, GoI. No action taken by

MoEF & CC, GoI and the case was returned to SEIAA after its reconstitution.


environment clearance on the following terms.



2. Total Built up area 210229.311 sqm

3. License 06.06.2018

4. Height 75 Meter

5. 2 Basements

930 DU, 164 EWS and 93 Servant Unit

Amenities Community Center, commercial Centre, Nursery

& Primary School







12. ECS 2084 ECS

13. RWH 17 pits



The Sultanpur wildlife sanctuary is at 7 Km radius, as declared by PP Pg. No. 176.

pp should submit the relevant proof of the same.


16

o The pp should incorporate the recommendations of MOEF for “ Water use


o Water trough may be provided at entry/exit so that the tyre of vehicles can

be washed

o PP may resubmit the “Water Balance Chart” for each season separately

after making necessary amendments






Item No.[27] Extension of Environmental Clearance of proposed Group Housing

Project, Express Greens II, Sector MIA, Sector MIA (19.643 acres),

Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana.

The case was considered in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that the

environmental clearance to this project was accorded by SEIAA vide letter dated

01.04.2009. The validity of EC letter was up to 31.03.2014. The project proponent vide

letter dated 20.03.2014 submitted the application for extension of validity of

environmental clearance letter for further two years. The project proponent informed that

120581.52 sqm of area has been constructed against the built up area of 180233 sqm i.e

80% of construction work has been completed. The project proponent also submitted

copy of valid license and certified copy of compliance report issued by RO, MOEF GOI,

Chandigarh. The project proponent also informed that the construction has been raised in

accordance with the approved plans and the Authority decided to grant extension of

validity of environmental clearance letter for further two years.

The project proponent again request to kindly grant the extension of validity of

Environmental Clearance from 2 years to 5 years i.e. for another 3 years, up to

27.10.2019.


decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and submit the report on the above within 15 days period.

Item No.[28] Complaint against Member Secretary SEIAA, Haryana for issuing a

letter dated 14.03.2016 against the Law of Raheja Developers Ltd.

(RDL) for their project Atharva at Sector-109, Gurgaon.

A complaint was received on 03.01.2017. The complainant was summoned of

appearing in person in 99th meeting of SEIAA on 19.01.2017 to explain the facts of the

complaint. During the meeting Authority decided to obtain the comments from the

17

concerned Ex-Member Secretary and also provide opportunity to M/s Raheja Developers

to appear in person/depute the authorized person before the authority to explain the

position.

After perusal of the original file record, comments of Sh. S.K.Goyal Ex. Member

Secretary SEIAA, reply filed by M/s Raheja Developers, complaint, Authority has come

to conclusion that there is no merit in complaint. The authority decided to file the

complaint.

********

1

Minutes of the 101st meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 22nd March, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS



dated 14.9.2006.



No. 172- 174 dated 21.03.2017 were discussed. Following decisions were taken:-




The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA held on 01.03.2017 and



consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and discussed that the reply

of project proponent does not quantify the top soil excavated and reused for the gardening

or landscaping purposes, record in this regard not provided. Secondly, the project

proponent has replied that the some quantity of soil has been used in road construction

and leveling purposes which is not permissible.

As per the Form 1A the top soil cover should be preserved and must be used for

landscaping and gardening purposes. A notice in this regard should be issued to project

proponent for the violation under Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.


“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.





of project proponent does not quantify the top soil excavated and reused for the gardening

or landscaping purposes, record in this regard not provided. Secondly, the project

proponent has replied that the some quantity of soil has been used in road construction

and leveling purposes which is not permissible.

As per the Form 1A the top soil cover should be preserved and must be used for

landscaping and gardening purposes. A notice in this regard should be issued to project

proponent for the violation under Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.

2

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for mining of Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2,

Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-Bhiwani,

Haryana by M/s United Mining Corporation.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for mining of

Stone at Manakawas Plot No.2, Near Village Manakawas, Tehsil Charkhi Dadri, District-

Bhiwani, Haryana over an area of 22.90 Ha by imposing stipulations stated therein.





Village Manakawas, Plot No.2. The project proponent on 27.09.2016 submitted online


Mining Scheme in the Mining plan is for 5 years. The project proponent has submitted

copy NOC from Forest Department. The SEAC appraised this project under category 1(a)

as category B-1 project as no other mine lease area is located within 500 meter.

The proposed production is 45,00,000 TPA for first 5 years. The water

requirement is 36.33 KLD. The project proponent has proposed to plant 500 saplings

every year for first 5 years along the roads, in barren area.


recommendations of SEAC to accord Environment Clearance to this project.









Water balance diagram

[1] Cooling tower for DG sets, as proposed by PP would be installed on terrace of

Block-A; the water required for cooling would not be same in all three seasons.

The water requirement would be considerably less in winter considering the

installation of Cooling Tower

[2] 500KVA DG sets should be either “Air Cooled” or have some alternate cooling

technology to conserve water

[3] Rejects/discharge of “Softening Plant” without treatment, probably not allowed

to discharge in municipal/HUDA sewer.

3

[4] PP has submitted that road washing will be carried out whenever it would be

required, then why 8.59/6.0/4.0 KLD (Kilo Liters per day)? Secondly,

Annexure 2 shows the same quantity of 8.59KLD for all the three seasons in

“Water Balance Diagram”

Diesel

[5] PP has stated that minimum 22Hrs per day of Power supply is available and thus

calculated diesel consumption/storage on the basis of 2 hrs of running of DG sets

but in Annexure 1 PP has shown 4-5 hrs per day of running of DG sets for

“Cooling water Requirement”; Why this anomaly?

[6] PP should resubmit the “Water Balance Charts” for all the three seasons

separately after incorporating the required amendments


that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised

observation within 15 days period.

Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for expansion of Piyala LPG Plant at Piyala,

Near Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd.


authority decided to call the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in

person in the next meeting to present their case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the

next meeting.

The case was considered in the today’s meeting and the authorized representative

appeared in the meeting to present their case. The representative of the project proponent

appear in person in the next meeting to present their case. Accordingly, the case was

deffered to the next meeting.

The case was considered in the today’s meeting and the Authorized representative

appeared in the meeting to present their case. The representative put forward their case by

citing the reference of a “MoEF & CC” letter dated 09th June, 2016 issued to M/s Bharat

Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Teela Shahbajpur, Uttar Pardesh and submitted an affidavit

stating that there will be no change in process / technology/ location of the unit; no

capacity enhancement / no change in product mix will take place and there will not be

any expansion in storage and bulk storage capacity will remain the same i.e. 8050 MT.

The representative submitted in writing that even after installing the new equipment the

daily production of the unit will remain same i.e. 1000 MT and submitted a copy of

“CTO” obtained from HSPCB dated 16.02.2016 valid up to 31.03.2019.

After detailed deliberation on the above subject and after going through all the

facts / papers / reference put forward by the representative; the authority decided to agree

with the recommendations of SEAC and noted that the features which will be added in

the existing plant do not attract the provision of EIA, Notification 2006 provided only

4

one 72 station Flex Carousal replaces the currently deployed three carousal of 24 stations

and will be placed in the same shed and will not alter the lay-out of plant and will not

have any bearing on “Environmental Health”.

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Complex

project at Village Wazirpur & Mewka, Sector-93, District-Gurgaon,





consideration in the today’s meeting. The M/s Ramparstha has applied for grant of EC for

2 acres of land out of 128.94 acres of land for which license No. 44 of 2010 has been

granted. This license which expired on 09.06.2016 has been applied for renewal. M/s

Ramprastha has sold 2 acres of land to M/s JMS Buildtech as per the documents

submitted. It was decided that M/s JMS Buildtech should submit an affidavit stating the

following:-

1. That they have paid their share of EDC/IDC to M/s Ramprastha who has deposited

the same to the concerned authorities.

2. That the M/S JMS Buildtech will be solely responsible for making arrangements

for the discharge of excess treated water, solid waste management & upkeepment

of STP etc.

3. That the M/S JMS Buildtech along with M/S Ramprastha will be responsible for

the compliances of all the conditions of Environmental Clearance.


SEAC and the project proponent directed to submit the satisfactory clarification to the

raised observation within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall

supply the copies of information to the Authority and after approval the letter shall be










[1] 5 KLD water loss due to evaporation in a 390 sqmt water body is very much on

the higher side. The project proponent is asked to revisit the reply.

5

[2] Detailed plan to reduce the hardness/TDS of water to be used for cooling towers of

DG sets/HVAC. How to handle/dispose the rejects? How much assumed quantity

of waste to be generated/dispose?


decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit

the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within

30 days period.

Item No.[8] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex

at Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bluejays Realtech Pvt. Ltd.


Authority decided to refer back this case to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may

clearly define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of

construction if any and submit its recommendation on merits along with the inspection

report within stipulated period.




application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex at

Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. A. K. Bhatia and Shri

Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the

following point:



decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the


days period.

Item No.[9] Environmental Clearance for the development of Group Housing

Colony “Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village

Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal, Haryana M/s Rurban Development

Corporation Pvt. Ltd.









6

application for Environmental Clearance for development of Group Housing Colony

“Rudco Golf Greens”located at Revenue Estates of Village Palwal, Sector-7, Palwal,

Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. G. R. Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. A. K.

Bhatia, Member SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:



decision that Sh. G. R. Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. A. K.Bhatia, Member SEAC shall



Item No.[10] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Ferozpur Namak Village,

Nuh Taluk Mewat District Haryana by Police Housing Corporation

Ltd.









application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat

District Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,





for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated above within 15 days

period.

Item No.[11]Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential and Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Bahraula Village, Palwal

Taluk, Palwal District, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing

Corporation Ltd.







7



application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential & Non-

residential buildings for Haryana Pllice at Ferozpur Namak Village, Nuh Taluk Mewat

District Haryana. The Authority decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N. Mishra,






period.

Item No.[12]Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project

located at Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana by M/s

Navtech Projects Pvt. Ltd.









application for Environmental Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project located at

Village-Ghatal Maniawas, district-Rewari, Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. G. R.

Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. R. K. Sapra, Member SEAC shall visit the site for

inspection of project on the following point:



decision that Sh. G. R. Goyat Chairman SEAC and Sh. R. K. Sapra, Member SEAC shall



Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village

Sohna Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana by Haryana Police Housing

Corporation.






8




application for Environmental Clearance for expansion of RTC at Bhondsi Village Sohna

Taluk, Gurgaon, Haryana. The Authority decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.

Mishra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following

point:





period.

Item No.[14]Environmental Clearance for Bio Medical Waste Management &

Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace

City-II, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vulcan Waste Management Pvt.

Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Bio Medical Waste

Management & Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace City-

II, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 4047 sqm. (1 Acres)

2. Total Capacity of

Plant

1. Incinerator

2. Autoclave

3. Shredder

20 tons/day

500 kg/hr

500 kg/batch

250 kg/hr

3. Estimated cost 2.50 crores

4. Power 90 KW (DHBVN)


6. Treated waste water

used for

Scrubbing, Gardening and Washing of Vehicles.



9. Waste Water 3.5 KLD ETP 5 KLD

10. Solid Waste 10-15 kg/day

The case was consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed that the project

proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the member of Authority and

in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the Authority to consider the case.

Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting with the advice to the project

proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the basis of which the SEAC has

recommended their case to all the members of Authority.

9

Item No.[15]Environmental Clearance for Additional 2x600 MT Mounded Bullets

Vessels for LPG Bottling Plant at Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Indian Oil

Corporation Limited.


therein. The Project Proponent has proposed Additional 2x600 MT Mounded Bullets

Vessels for LPG Bottling Plant at Gurgaon, Haryana.


“Terms of Reference”. It was decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by

using Model Terms of Reference of MoEF & CC along with the following additional

terms of reference:

1. Public hearing to be conducted for the project as per provisions of Environmental

Impact assessment Notification, 2006 and the issues raised by the public should be

addressed in the Environmental Management plan.

2. The project proponent should obtain the permission from CGWA for use of

existing tube wells.

3. The project proponent should obtain the NOC under Aravali Notification, 1992

from District Collector, Gurgaon.

4. The project proponent should obtain the permission of expansion from the

competent authority.

5. The project proponent should obtain the NOC from the Director, Explosive.

6. The project proponent should submit one month fresh data of ambient air quality.

7. The project proponent should submit details of water body near the project site.

8. The project proponent should submit the proposal for strengthening of roads.

9. The project proponent should submit the effects of traffic on ambient air quality.

****

1

Minutes of the 102nd meeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 20th April, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.







The case was lastly considered in the 101st meeting of SEIAA held on 22.03.2017

and the Authority issued a notice to project proponent for the violation under

Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.


consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and

corroborated the reply with the report of visiting team of SEAC members.





“Ninex City” at Sector-76, Village KherkiDaula, Gurgaon, Haryana by

M/s Ninex Developers Ltd.


and the Authority issued a notice to project proponent for the violation under

Environment (Protection) Act. 1986.


consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and

corroborated the reply with the report of visiting team of SEAC members.








and the case was deferred.



2

of project proponent and found it to be satisfactory. Further Authority asked the project

proponent to submit an affidavit stating the followings:

[1] That the waste water from the cooling tower / filter back wash/or reject of RO or

softener would be treated and handled as per the guidelines issued by Pollution Control

Board/ MoEF & CC time to time

[2] That any permission required from any authority State or Centre for the

use/storage/transportation of diesel for DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent

oil would be handled as per the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard


SEAC and the project proponent directed to submit the above said undertakings/affidavits

satisfactory clarification within 15 days and will submit the copies to all the members of

SEIAA, after their approval the EC letter shall be issued.

Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for Bio Medical Waste Management &

Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace

City-II, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vulcan Waste Management Pvt.

Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Bio Medical Waste

Management & Treatment facility at premises-725, Sector-37, Industrial Area, Pace City-

II, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 4047 sqm. (1 Acres)

2. Total Capacity of

Plant

1. Incinerator

2. Autoclave

3. Shredder

20 tons/day

500 kg/hr

500 kg/batch

250 kg/hr

3. Estimated cost 2.50 crores

4. Power 90 KW (DHBVN)


6. Treated waste water

used for

Scrubbing, Gardening and Washing of Vehicles.



9. Waste Water 3.5 KLD ETP 5 KLD

10. Solid Waste 10-15 kg/day


today’s meeting. The Authority found that the project proponent has proposed to install

Incinerator technology is old and is not suitable in comparison of other alternative

technology available. Therefore, authority unanimously decided to ask the project

proponent to adopt the Plasma Pyrolysis or Gasification Technology for combustion of

bio-medical waste.

3


SEAC and EC would be accorded provided project proponent resubmit the proposal with

the proposed installation of latest technology i.e. Plasma Pyrolysis or Gasification

Technology as mentioned above. The project proponent must submit the plan to

handle/disposal of the ash thus generated and schematic plan to treat/handle the waste

water generated through the scrubber. The project proponent is further asked to submit

the copies of the same to the respective members of SEIAA within 15 days; if found to

align with the requirement the EC letter shall be issued by the office.

Item No.[5] Request for confirmation regarding exemption amendment in

Environment Clearance “EC” for our Residential Colony namely

“Parklands” falling in Sectors-82-88 & 89 by M/s Countrywide

Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

As per the amendment in the EIA Notification issued recently by Ministry of

Environment and Forest & Climate Change, Government of India on dated 09th

December, 2016, the construction projects having covered area more than 300000 Sq.

Meters falls under the competency of the Ministry of Environment and Forest & Climate

Change, Government of India.

In view of above, the Authority is of the unanimous view that this case is having

area 898150.71 Sq. Meters. Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt. of built up

area; as per notification dated 9th December 2016; the case may be sent to MoEF & CC,

GoI.

Item No.[6] Environment Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project- EDGE

Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,


The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016

and the case was referred back to SEAC with the decision that the SEAC may clearly

define why to de-list, if required then SEAC should visit the site to check status of






application for Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project- EDGE

Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon, Haryana. The Authority

decided that Sh. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit

the site for inspection of project on the following point:



decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall

4



Item No.[7] Environment Clearance for proposed Residential Area Development

Project at Sector-14-P-II and Sector-33 in Hisar by Office of the

Executive Engineer HUDA, Division No. II, Hisar.







area 849350.25 Sq. Meters. Since this case pertains to more than 3 lakh sqmt of built up


GoI.

Item No.[8] Environment Clearance Boulder Gravel and Sand Mino Mineral Mines

at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00 Ha. in District-Yamuna

Nagar by M/s Kawal Jeet Singh Batra, S/o Sh. Makhan Singh Batra

Building,

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the Boulder

Gravel and Sand Mino Mineral Mines at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00

Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The

project proponent supplied the copies at the eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the

members of the Authority need some time to go through the project report. The Authority

unanimously decided to defer the case to the next meeting.

Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for mining of ‘Stone along with Associated

Minor Minerals’ in the revenue estate of Village Usmapur, District-

Mahendergarh, Haryana by M/s Astha Infra Developer Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for approval of TOR subject to

stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed mining of ‘Stone along

with Associated Minor Minerals’ in the revenue estate of Village Usmapur, District-

Mahendergarh, Haryana.

In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it was

decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA by using Model Terms of

Reference of MoEF & CC along with the following additional terms of reference:

1. Public hearing to be conducted for the project as per provisions of Environmental

Impact Assessment Notification, 2006 and the issues raised by the public should

be addressed in the Environmental Management Plan.

5

2. The PP should submit an permission from competent authority regarding the

distance of the project site from the Inter-State boundary as crow fly distance.

3. Detail calculation of water requirement for various purposes with permissions.

4. Permission of Competent Authority (DGMS) regarding mine safety.

5. Impact of vibration due to use of explosive on surround area alongwith mitigating

measures.

6. No mining activity shall be conducted within 500 meters from any hydraulic

structure, bridges, pumping station etc.

7. Impact of movement of transportation for carrying mined material on Ambient

Air and surrounding area including traffic congestion on roads.

8. No mining activity shall be conducted within 250 meters from outer periphery of

major district roads, national highway, state highway and defined village abadi.

9. Impact on Ambient Air and mitigative measures for the same along with

appropriate plan.

10. Plan for controlling water pollution especially from domestic effluent.

11. Rain water harvesting proposal to be given in detail.

12. Replenishment study report in case of river sand gavel mining proposal.

13. Mining activity shall not change course of river/canal/other water bodies.

14. NOC from forest department for project site.

15. The PP shall comply with all guidelines of MOEF & CC and any orders passed by

Hon’ble Supreme Court/High Court/NGT.

16. NOC from wildlife.

17. Permission from Irrigation Department for sand mining from river/canal bed and

bund area.

18. Width of Bench shall never be less than bench height.

19. No mechanized mining shall be done vin river bed in view of orders of Hon’ble

NGT. No mining shall be done in river bed during monsoon period.

20. PP shall not exceed the production of mineral than the production figures

mentioned in approved mining plan.

21. Replenishment and drainage study from the reputed institution.

22. Impact of mining activity on adjacent agricultural land with particular reference to

run off, soil erosion and loss of top soil due to change in topography.

23. Details of Transportation of mined out materials as per the Indian Road Congress

for both the ways (loaded as well as unloaded trucks) load and its impact on

Environment.

24. Impact of all existing mining on the present land use in the study area.

25. The PP should submit compliance of all the conditions of Letter of Intent issued

by the Mines and Geology Department Haryana.

6

26. Details of excavation schedule & sequent8ial mining plan.

27. Monitoring of water quality and ground water level.

Item No.[10] Environment Clearance for construction of Expansion of Residential

Plotted Colony Project located at Sector-106, 108, 109 Vill Babupur

and Pawala Khusrupur, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Chintels India Ltd.









GoI.

Item No.[11] Environment Clearance for proposed 5 MLD Common Effluent

Treatment Plant (CETP) at HSIIDC, Village Saha, District-Ambala,

Haryana by HSIIDC,

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for proposed 5

MLD Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) at HSIIDC, Village Saha, District-

Ambala, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed

that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of document to the members of





Item No.[12] Environment Clearance for Expansion & Modernization by (Combining

two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development project (3.2312

acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas,

District Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Arnon Builder and Developers

Limited.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for Expansion &

Modernization by (Combining two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development

project (3.2312 acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas, District

Gurgaon Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was noticed

that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of document to the members of




7


Item No.[13] Environment Clearance for Affordable Group Housing Project at

Village Wazirpur, Sec-95A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Forever

Builtech Private Limited.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Affordable Group

Housing Project at Village Wazirpur, Sec-95A, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:


1. Plot area 32512 sqm



4. Nos. of Towers 11 Towers, G/S + 13 Floors, Commercial

convenient shopping, community,

Anganwadi

5. Dwelling units 1101 total DU






11 STP Capacity 830 KLD

12. Power Requirement 5250 KVA DHBVN


14. ECS 564 ECS + 1962 Two wheeler

15. RWH 19 pits


today’s meeting and the Authority studied and discussed in detail and found the

following observations:

Water balance Chart

The project proponent has replied on 30/03/2017 to the query “PP should submit

revised fresh water requirement as per MoEF norms” raised by SEAC during its

147th meeting held on 30/01/2017. The project proponent has not incorporated the

recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as given in Table

2.4. Thus, project proponent is asked to incorporate the same and resubmit the


The project proponent has asked for 30 KLD for “Filter Back wash” that too

“Fresh water” ; as such PP is asking for 2 KLD for cooling tower & 30KLD for

filter back wash; anomaly, must substantiate with proper calculations & reference.

PP must use treated water for “Filter Backwash”. How is it feasible that the

cooling tower is requiring only 2 KLD of treated water and the associated filter

needs 30 KLD for its washing, explain?

8

The project proponent has shown that 2 KLD of water is required for DG set

cooling; location of cooling tower, schematic plan to treat the inlet & outlet water

of cooling tower and handling of rejects; not shown.

The project proponent should submit “Water Balance Chart” for different seasons

after making the necessary amendments.

Form 1A

Pt. 8.1 / 9.1/9.5/9.6 not explained properly

Pt. 8.3; stating Fly-ash would be used in road construction, how would fly-ash be

procured, stored & used? Elaborate properly

The project proponent may submit undertaking that the waste water from the

cooling tower / filter back wash/or reject of RO or softener would be treated and

handled as per the guidelines issued by Pollution Control Board/ MoEF & CC

time to time

The project proponent may submit an undertaking stating that any permission

required from any authority State or Centre for the use/storage/transportation of

diesel for DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent oil would be handled as

per the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard






Item No.[14] Environment Clearance for Affordable Housing project at Sector-36,

Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Sternal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Affordable Housing

project at Sector-36, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:





4. Nos. of Towers 13 Towers, GF + 14 Floors, Commercial

convenient shopping, community hall/

building, Anganwadi


6. Green belt 22.9%



9





13. ECS 656 ECS

14. RWH 13 pits


today’s meeting and the Authority studied and discussed in detail and found the

following observations:

Water balance Chart

The project proponent has replied on 30/03/2017 to the query “PP should submit

revised fresh water requirement as per MoEF norms” raised by SEAC during its

147th meeting held on 30/01/2017. The project proponent has not incorporated the

recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as given in Table

2.4. Thus, project proponent is asked to incorporate the same and resubmit the


The project proponent has shown that 3.45 KLD of water is required for DG set

cooling; location of cooling tower, schematic plan to treat the inlet & outlet water

of cooling tower and handling of rejects; not shown

The project proponent should submit “Water Balance Chart” for different seasons

after making the necessary amendments.

Form 1A

Pt. 8.1 & 9.1 not explained properly

Pt. 8.3; stating Fly-ash would be used in road construction, how would fly-ash be

procured, stored & used? Elaborate properly

What type of “APCM” or any other equipment will be installed to arrest the

fugitive particles may be emitting during the use of Fly-ash

PP may submit undertaking that the waste water from the cooling tower / filter

back wash/or reject of RO or softener would be treated and handled as per the

guidelines issued by Pollution Control Board/ MoEF & CC time to time

The project proponent may submit an undertaking stating that any permission

required from any authority State or Centre for the use/storage/transportation of

diesel for DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent oil would be handled as

per the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard.




10



Item No.[15] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Sarvodaya

Hospital & Research Centre (A Unit of Anshu Hospital Ltd.) At Site

No. 1, Sector-08 at Faridabad by M/s Anshu Hospitals Limited.

The SEAC was taken up this case for appraisal in the 149th meeting held on

31.03.2017and recommended to SEIAA for clarification whether this case is to be

considered as that of violation or not.

In the today’s meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority decided to call

the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next

meeting to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.

Item No.[16] Environment Clearance for river Bed Mining Project of Minor

Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of

12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-

Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Gobindpur Royalty Company.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the river Bed

Mining Project of Minor Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of

12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana

was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The project proponent supplied the

copies at the eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the members of the Authority need some

time to go through the project report. The Authority unanimously decided to defer the

case to the next meeting.

Item No.[17] Environment Clearance for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor

Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3” District:

Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Jai Dada Dohla Stone Mines.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the Stone

Mine along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No.

3” District: Bhiwani, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The






Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Pioneer Partners.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the Stone

Mine along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No.

11

2” District: Bhiwani, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. The




Item No.[19] Environment Clearance for proposed “Stone Along with Associated

Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B 1,

Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha by

M/s SBIPL Projects Limited.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the “Stone

Along with Associated Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B

1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. The project proponent supplied the copies at the

eleventh hour of the meeting, so all the members of the Authority need some time to go

through the project report. The Authority unanimously decided to defer the case to the

next meeting.

Item No.[20] Environment Clearance for proposed expansion of Clinker Grinding

Unit (1.5 to 2.5 Million TPA) along with installation of Captive Power

Plant (10 MW) near village Khukhrana, P.O.Assan Kalan, District-

Panipat (Haryana) by M/s Shree Cement Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to file this case as withdrawal in its 150th meeting

held on 06.04.2017 as per the request by the project proponent.

In the today’s meeting the Authority as gone through the case and related facts,

therefore the Authority asked project proponent to submit an affidavit stating that there

will not be any Capacity enhancement in the Clinker Grinding Unit and no proposed

captive Power plant would be installed. Further, the pp has been asked to submit the units

of power consumed in the financial year 2014-15 and 2015-16.

Item No.[21] Environment Clearance for IT/ITES SEZ Project located at Village

Behrampur, Tehsil-Sohna, Distt-Gurgaon by M/s Mikado Realtors

Pvt. Ltd.








12


GoI.

Item No.[22] Environment Clearance for 25 MLD Common Effluent Treatment

Plant (CETP) for Phase III and IV along with up gradation from 15

MLD to 30 KLD CETP for Phase I and II located at Industrial Model

Township, Manesar, Haryana by M/s Haryana State Industrial and

Infrastructure Development corporation Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for 25 MLD Common

Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) for Phase III and IV along with up gradation from 15

MLD to 30 KLD CETP for Phase I and II located at Industrial Model Township,

Manesar, Haryana.



Reference of MoEF & CC.

Item No.[23] Environment Clearance for Group Housing colony project at Sector-

82A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Vatika Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Group Housing colony

project at Sector-82A, Gurgaon, Haryana as under:




3. License Valid up 23.03.2017 (invalid)

4. Nos. of Towers 3 Towers (1 High rise tower + 2 mid rise

tower), 2 Basements + GF + Max. 39

Floors,

5. DU 169 Main Units, 122 EWS Units,

Convenient shopping area.







12. Power Requirement 4045.50 KW DHBVN

13. Solid Waste 786 kg/day (2 nos. of OWC i.e. 500 kg/day

& 100 kg/day)

14. ECS 407 ECS

13

15. RWH 11 pits


today’s meeting and the Authority studied in detail and discussed that the license was

valid till 23.03.2017. The case has been referred back to SEAC with the suggestion to

visit the site to verify any construction or violation of environmental norms and asked to

submit the report within 15 days .

ItemNo.[24]Environment Clearance for expansion of existing

IndustrialWarehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari,

Tehsil & Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana by M/s HCY Industrial Park Pvt. Ltd.

The recommendation of SEAC to accord environment clearance for the expansion

of existing IndustrialWarehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari, Tehsil &

Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting. It was

noticed that the project proponent has failed to supply the copies of documents to the

members of Authority and in the absence of the documents it was not possible to the

Authority to consider the case. Accordingly, the case was deferred to the next meeting

with the advice to the project proponent to supply the complete set of documents on the

basis of which the SEAC has recommended their case to all the members of Authority.

Item No.[25] Environment Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Project

“Lavanya Apartments” at Sector-81, Village Nawada Fatehpur,

Gurgaon by M/s Graphic Research Consultants (India) Pvt . Ltd.

The SEAC was considered this case in its 150th meeting held on 06.04.2017.

During discussion, it was revealed that project proponent has already started the

construction without obtaining prior environmental clearance which amounts to violation

of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. The fact apparently was brought before the

Committee on reference to the project proposal.

The Committee again went through the latest Notification dated 14.03.2017

relating to Consideration of proposals for ToRs/Environment Clearance involving

violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986/Environment Impact

Assessment(EIA) Notification, 2006 which clearly states that in case the project or

activities required prior Environmental Clearance under Environmental Impact

Assessment Notification, 2006 from the concerned Regulatory Authority are brought for

Environmental Clearance after starting the construction work, or have undertaking

expansion, modernization and change in product mix without prior Environmental

Clearance , these projects shall be treated as cases of violation and in such cases, even

14

Category B projects which are granted environmental clearance by the State Environment

Impact Assessment Authority constituted under sub-section(3) of section 3 of the

Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 shall be apprised for grant of environmental

clearance only by the Expert Appraisal Committee and the Environmental Clearance will

be granted at the Central level.

In the today’s meeting the Authority decided that this case may be sent to MoEF

& CC, GoI as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017.

Item No.[26] Environment Clearance for proposed Modernization with process

integration of existing herbal extracts and their purified derivatives

for manufacturing of herbal extracts and active pharmaceuticals

ingredients (capacity 320 kg/day) at Village Kaili, Tehsil-Ballabgarh,

Dist-Faridabad, Haryana by Alchem International Pvt. Ltd.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Modernization with

process integration of existing herbal extracts and their purified derivatives for

manufacturing of herbal extracts and active pharmaceuticals ingredients (capacity 320

kg/day) at Village Kaili, Tehsil-Ballabgarh, Dist-Faridabad, Haryana.



Reference of MoEF & CC.

*******

1


held on. 17th May, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.



No. 317-319 dated 12.05.2017 were discussed following decisions were taken:-

Item No.[1]Environment Clearance Boulder Gravel and Sand Miner Mineral Mines

at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00 Ha. in District-Yamuna

Nagar by M/s Kawal Jeet Singh Batra, S/o Sh. Makhan Singh Batra

Building.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Boulder

Gravel and Sand Miner Mineral Mines at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00

Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar as under:





3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by Boulder Gravel

and Sand Minor Mineral Mines at Galuri Block/YNR B-39 over an area of 24.00

Ha. in District-Yamuna Nagar for a period of 08 years vide letter dated

20.10.2016.


Forest Department.

5. The proposed production is 4,40, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water requirement

is 20 KLD.

6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 913 for first year saplings and 633

every year for 4 years along the roads, in barren area.



[1] Pt. 5.2/5.5 of Form1-A; fugitive emission expected during loading of mineral

cannot be controlled by simply spraying water on the haul road. PP must elaborate

concrete measures to suppress/arrest the fugitive emissions caused due to

handling/loading of mineral.

[2] Pt.7.1;Form 1, spent oil/hydraulic oil/lubricating oil or grease/diesel would be

required to run various machines employed at the site utmost care has to be taken

2

not to let such oils spill over the mining area or nearby being closer to river bed.

What precautions/means PP do propose?

[3] Loaded vehicles would be plying, dust particles under the wheels would be

repeatedly crushed & getting finer & finer giving rise to Air Pollution. Elaborate

the plan to take care of this aspect.






Item No.[2] Environment Clearance for proposed 5 MLD Common Effluent

Treatment Plant (CETP) at HSIIDC, Village Saha, District-Ambala,

Haryana by HSIIDC.

The SEAC has recommended this project for Environmental Clearance under

category 7(h) of EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The Project Proponent has proposed

project 05 MLD CETP is located in Industrial Growth Center, Saha District Ambala,

Haryana. The total developed area Industrial Growth Centre Saha is 610 acres (Phase-I -

410.36 acers and Phase-II 250.94 acers), out of which 5.59 Acres of land is allotted for

the CETP in Sector 2 of Phase-I. HSIIDC has planned to setup 10 MLD Common

Effluent Treatment Plant for its member industries in two modules 05 MLD each.

Total green belt provided within the CETP area is 73.2% i.e.16540.45 Sqmt. The

greenbelt in entire industrial growth center is 85.55 ha i.e. 34.55 %. Plantation

(periphery): 12253.57 Sqmt, plantation along road & berms: 277375.69 Sqmt, Lawn area

is 192642.48 Sqmt. and within the industrial plot: 373216.65 Sqmt. The units in this

Industrial Growth Center are mostly green and orange category and are less water

intensive. The major types of industries are Food & processing industries and scientific

industries. The treatment system involves Primary Treatment (Fine Screening, Grit

Removal, Oil Removal and Equalization), Physico Chemical Treatment , Secondary

Treatment (Activated Sludge Process- Extended Aeration), and finally treatment will be

done Dual Media filter followed by Chlorination in Chlorine Contact Tank the resultant

solid waste generated will be sent to authorized TSDF site. The power requirement is 440

KVA supplied from Haryana State Electricity Board (HSEB). In case of power failure

160 KVA DG sets are proposed as power backup.


meeting. The Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC to accord

Environment Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.

3

Item No.[3] Environment Clearance for Expansion & Modernization by (Combining

two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development project (3.2312

acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas, District

Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Arnon Builder and Developers Limited.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for Expansion &

Modernization by (Combining two EC cleared Commercial Complex Development project

(3.2312 acres + 3.462 acres = 6.6932 acres) Sector-65, village Maidawas, District Gurgaon

Haryana as under:




3. License Valid up to 22.10.2016 & 07/01/16 (Invalid

license)

4. Nos. of Towers 2 Basements Office Building, Retails/Shops,

Food Court









13. ECS 1043 ECS

14. RWH 05 pits






[1] Provision for make-up water of water Body is on higher side

[2] 135 KLD Water required for Cooling Towers; Location of cooling towers on the

lay-out plan?

[3] The fig. of 135 KLD may be substantiated by some calculations.

[4] PP has proposed to use 64 KLD of Fresh Water for Cooling Towers ; water being

a scarce resource, for Cooling & Horticulture purposes PP is being asked to use

“Treated Water” only

(i) There would be water loss due to evaporation, drifting etc. in the cooling

towers installed for DG or HVAC but the entire water present in circuit will

not vanish residual quantity will remain in the circuit, thereby, increase in

dissolved salts and increase in hardness. PP may depict how would this

water be treated or rejects be handled?

4

(ii) PP be asked to incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use


(iii) PP be asked to resubmit the “Water Balance charts” for different seasons

after making the suggested amendments

(iv) PP may submit undertaking that the waste water from the cooling tower /

filter back wash/or reject of RO or softener would be treated and handled as

per the guidelines issued by Pollution Control Board/ MoEF&CC time to

time and PP would be using only “Treated water” for Cooling/Horticulture

purposes

(v) PP may submit an undertaking stating that any permission required from

any authority State or Centre for the use/storage/transportation of diesel for

DG sets would be duly obtained and the spent oil would be handled as per

the guide lines issued or will be issued in this regard

[5] Licence was valid up to 22/10/16 (annex.-7) & other up to 07/01/16; any

explanation.

[6] Pt.8.1/9.1(assumed Energy consumption per sq. foot of built-up area)/9.5/9.6/9.7

of Form1-a be explained properly).


decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the

above raised observation within 15 days period and Sh. R. K. Sapra and Sh. A.K.Bhatia

Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report of

compliance of conditions imposed in the existing environment clearances letter.

Item No.[4] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Sarvodaya Hospital

& Research Centre (A Unit of Anshu Hospital Ltd.) At Site No. 1,

Sector-08 at Faridabad by M/s Anshu Hospitals Limited.

The case was considered in the 102nd meeting after the detailed deliberation the

authority decided to call the authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in

person in the next meeting to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the

next meeting.

The case was considered in the today’s meeting and the Authorized representative

appeared in the meeting to present their case. The Authority decided that Sh. A. K. Bhatia

and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for fact finding and spot

inspection. The visiting team should also verify the various compliances of conditions of



decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the

site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days period.

5

Item No.[5] Environment Clearance for river Bed Mining Project of Minor Mineral

Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of 12,78,000 TPA at

Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana by

M/s Gobindpur Royalty Company.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for River Bed

Mining Project of Minor Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of

12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula, Haryana

as under.





3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by river Bed Mining

Project of Minor Mineral Boulder, Gravel and Sand with production capacity of

12,78,000 TPA at Village Gobindpur, Tehsil-Raipur Rani, District-Panchkula,

Haryana for a period of 10 years vide letter dated 09.06.2015.


Forest Department.

5. The proposed production is 12, 78,000 TPA for first 5 years. The water


6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 468 plants saplings for every year for

5 years along the roads, in barren area.



[1] Pt. 5.2/5.3/5.5 of Form 1; Simply by sprinkling of water dust generated due to

plying of vehicles or loading/unloading & transportation of mineral may not be

suppressed effectively.Elaborate the plan to take care of this aspect

[2] Spent oil/hydraulic oil/lubricating oil or grease/diesel would be required to run

various machines employed at the site utmost care has to be taken not to let such

oils spill over the mining area or nearby being closer to river bed. What

precautions/means PP do propose?

[3] Loaded vehicles would be plying, dust particles under the wheels would be

repeatedly crushed & getting finer & finer giving rise to Air Pollution. Elaborate

the plan to take care of this aspect






6



Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Jai Dada Dohla Stone Mines.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Stone Mine

along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3”

District: Bhiwani, Haryana as under:



2. The SEAC in its 134th meeting held on 31.05.2016 approved the TOR for EIA

study. The public hearing was held on 06.03.2017. The study period October to

31 December 2016.




Geology Department Haryana for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor

Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 3” District: Bhiwani,



Forest Department.

6. The proposed production is 21, 00, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water









Bhiwani, Haryana by M/s Pioneer Partners.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for Stone Mine

along with Associated Minor Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 2”

District: Bhiwani, Haryana as under :





31 December 2016.

7




Geology Department Haryana for Stone Mine along with Associated Minor

Minerals (Minor Mineral) at “Pichopa Kalan Plot No. 2” District: Bhiwani,



Forest Department.








Item No.[8] Environment Clearance for proposed “Stone Along with Associated

Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B 1,

Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha by

M/s SBIPL Projects Limited.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for “Stone

Along with Associated Minor Mineral” Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B

1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha as under:





31 December 2016.




Geology Department Haryana for Stone Along with Associated Minor Mineral”

Mines of “Kalyana Plot No.2” under Category B 1, Tehsil-Dadri, District-

Bhiwani, Haryana having area of 29.50 Ha for a period of 10 years vide letter

dated 11.04.2016.


Forest Department.



8






Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for proposed expansion of Clinker Grinding

Unit (1.5 to 2.5 Million TPA) along with installation of Captive Power

Plant (10 MW) near village Khukhrana, P.O.Assan Kalan, District-

Panipat (Haryana) by M/s Shree Cement Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to file this case as withdrawal in its 150th meeting

held on 06.04.2017 as per the request by the project proponent.

The case was considered in the 102nd meeting in the SEIAA. The Authority as

gone through the case and related facts, therefore the Authority asked project proponent

to submit an affidavit stating that there will not be any Capacity enhancement in the

Clinker Grinding Unit and no proposed captive Power plant would be installed. Further,

the pp has been asked to submit the units of power consumed in the financial year 2014-

15 and 2015-16.

The Project proponent has failed to submit the asked undertaking/documents so

the case has been deferred.

ItemNo.[10] Environment Clearance for expansion of existing Industrial

Warehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari, Tehsil &

Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana by M/s HCY Industrial Park Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for expansion

of existing Industrial Warehousing/Logistics/Assembling Park at Village Luhari, Tehsil

& Dist. Jahajjar, Haryana as under:

Sr.

No.

Particular Existing

(sqmt)

Revision

(sqmt)

Expansion

(sqmt)

Total (EC Accorded +

Revision) (sqmt)

1 Total Plot Area 103271.20 s 109593.29

(27.08 Acres)

2 Built up Area 56269.92 4758.68 5373.78 63159.6

3 Blocks 6 Blocks

B500, B600,

B700, B800,

B900, B1000

1 block (B600

& B700 will

be combined

together and

termed as

B750)

5 Blocks

B500, B750, B800,

B900, B1000

4 Total Water 76 KLD

5 Fresh Water 17. KLD

7 Waste Water 49 KLD

8 STP 130 KLD

9 RWH 25 pits 1 pits 26 pits

10 Parking 619 ECS 39 ECS 658 ECS

11 Power Req. 1500 KVA 1500 KVA

9

12 Solid Waste 300 KG/day 300 /day






[1] Fresh water requirement 17 KLD + treated water requirement 59KLD = 76 KLD

of total water requirement; check the calculations on the presentation.

[2] PP has been asked to resubmit the revised “Water Balance Chart” in the 150th

Meeting of SEAC held on 06/04/17.

[3] PP resubmitted its reply & raised the “Fresh water” demand to 57 KLD; why?

Initially, PP proposed to use 24 KLD of “Treated water” for horticulture out of

which 21KLD (pg.no.17 of presentation)was planned to be taken from other sources, a

much better plan to save water. But in the reply submitted 39KLD Fresh water + 9 KLD

Treated water= 48 KLD of water for horticulture, why so? Water being a scarce resource

and all be done to conserve, therefore, instead of Fresh water treated water be used, as

proposed earlier, for Horticulture.

[4] PP be asked to incorporate the recommendations of MOEF on “Water use


[5] PP be asked to resubmit the “Water Balance charts” for different seasons after

making the suggested amendments

[6] STP process flow diagram; PP proposed to use Softener for the removal of water

hardness but not shown how the rejects/residue would be handled?

[7] Revisit the reply to pt.8.3 of Form 1A; Clean Wood or Portland Cement are not

“Recyclable or Recycled” material






ItemNo.[11] Environmental Clearance for “Recreation and Leisure Project” in

village- Wazirabad, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/S DLF Limited.

The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016.

The Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri

Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the

report. The committee has submitted the site visit report on 24.04.2017. The site visit

report submitted by the committee is as under:

10

Site Visit Report

The Project proponent has submitted the details of the project and reason for its

delay in construction which is annexed as Annexure-P. As per this annexure, DLF

obtained 350.75 acres of land in village Wazirabad, Gurgaon from HSIIDC, Haryana.

Out of total land area of 350.75 acres, the area under section 4 and/or of 5 of Punjab Land

Preservation Act (PLPA, 1900) is 91.97 acre, the area under Aravalli plantation scheme is

161.03 are and the balance area is 92.72 acre. The PP did not pursue the EC of the project

because the matter of allotment of land was sub-judice in the court. The PP has confirmed

in their report through affidavit that no construction has been done at site (Annex-3).

The sub-committee visited the site of proposed project on 24.02.2017. The project

site is surrounded by DLF Golf and Country Club on the north, Gurgaon-Faridabad road

on east and DLF City Phase-V group housing on the west. Map showing the project site

and surrounding area is enclosed as Annexure-2 of PP report. The project site is densely

forested with undulated terrain and is a part of the Aravalli hills which recharges the

ground water. The committee did not find any construction on the site.

The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and finding no reason to

disagree with recommendations of SEAC in this case the Authority decided to de-list this

case. It was also decided that the decision of the Authority should be conveyed to the

Project Proponent and copy of the same be forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution

Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana & R.O. MOEF, GOI for information and necessary

action.

ItemNo.[12] Environmental Clearance for National Cancer Institute, AIIMS,

Jhajjar, Haryana by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS).

The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on 05.12.2016.

The Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Shri S.N.Mishra and Shri

Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the

report. The committee has submitted the site visit report on 24.04.2017. The site visit

report submitted by the committee is as under:

Site Visit Report

MoEF vide letter no. F.No. 21-108/2015-IA.III dated 15th July, 2015 has issued

Environmental Clearance (EC) of this project, which has been attached as annexure-1,

therefore no site inspection is required in this case. Hence, no EC violation has been done

in this case.

The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and decided to file this case as

the environment clearance has been granted by MoEF & CC, GoI.

11

Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for proposed Expansion of Miri Piri

Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Campus at Shahbab

markanda, Kurukshetra, Haryana by M/S Miri Piri Institute of

Medical Sciences & Research (Charitbale Trust).

The case was taken up in the 151st meeting of the SEAC held on 02.05.2017.

During discussions, it was observed by the Committee, that project proponent has not

obtained CLU from the competent authority which is a mandatory document as per

Checklist. Earlier also the SEAC has directed M/s Miri Piri Institute to submit the CLU

but the same has not been submitted so far. The case was not appraised by the SEAC, as

no other case without CLU from the competent authority was appraised by the SEAC so

far. The Committee is of the unanimous view that the case may be forwarded to SEIAA

for necessary advice in this matter.


today’s meeting and the Authority refer back this case to the SEAC with the advice that

the case should be appraised after the submission of proper CLU by the project

proponent.

Item No.[14] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony Project at Vill-

Badshahpur, Sector-67, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Khanna

Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for

Commercial Colony Project at Vill- Badshahpur, Sector-67, Gurgaon, Haryana as

under:




3. License Valid up to 27.08.2016 further applied for renewal

of the license

4. Nos. of Towers 3 Basements + GF+9 Floors, Service apartments

and Retails area.


6. Green belt 26.27% (1846.764 sqmt)

Greenbelt plantation 328.593 + Green Lawn area

495.635 + Avenue Plantation area 710.804 +

Peripheral Plantation area 311.732 sqm.

7. Water

requirement

194 KLD




11 Power

Requirement

5000 KVA DHBVN

12. Solid Waste 266.31 kg/day (1 no. of OWC 250 kg/day)

13. ECS 324 ECS

14. RWH 03 pits

12






[1] Pg.No. 40, 9.12 of Form 1-A states that “The Project will not be “Centrally air-

conditioned” and pt. 9.7 does not elaborate on whether proposed chillers would be

CFC&HCFC free, not states “Assumed load of Air-conditioning” & the

specifications, all this leads to the assumption that no “Air-conditioning system” is

proposed. At the same time Fig.2(a)pg.no.52 depicts requirement of 100KLD

water for “Cooling Towers” of HVAC system. Both are in contradiction, explain

[2] Location of Cooling towers of HVAC & DG sets on the lay-out plan

HVAC Cooling

[3] 100KLD= 95KLD Fresh water + 5 KLD Treated Water; 75 KLD would be re-

circulated (as per Fig.2a), what type of arrangement PP is planning to install to

treat the re-circulating water? How would the rejects/residue thus obtained be

handled? Submit a schematic plan

[4] As per Fig.2a 20 KLD will be lost in evaporation/drifting etc.; means 20 KLD is

required for “Replenishment”; the make-up demand should be met with “Treated

Water” not “Fresh Water”

[5] Secondly, as per Fig.2a 75KLD is always in circuit then why demand of 130 KL

of fresh water that too on daily basis ?

[6] 8 KLD of treated water is required for Cooling Tower of DG sets, capacity of both

the DG sets is 750KVA, can be air-cooled and precious water can be saved.

[7] In case of Cooling Tower of DG sets the major quantity of water is lost due to

evaporation which leads to increase in quantity of “Dissolved salts” rendering it

difficult for further use without being properly treated. PP is being asked to submit

Schematic plan depicting the method of treating this water; reducing the hardness

and how to handle rejects/residue being thus obtained?

[8] Water Balance Chart declares “Zero Liquid Discharge”, how is it practically

feasible? For example, 8 KLD of water is demanded for Cooling Towers of DG

sets; this requirement of water is directly proportional to running of DG sets which

are for stand-by purposes. PP has assumed availability of power 18hrs a day;

somehow if power is available for more than 18 hrs means DG sets would run less

than 6hrs/day needing less water for cooling, means the extra quantity of Treated

Water would be there, where this extra quantity would lead to?

[9] Fig.3(a); Water Balance Chart for “Winter season”, water demand has been

reduced by 3 KLD as horticulture would be requiring less water. Logically &

13

practically, the quantity of water required for Cooling Towers in winter should be

less but PP has maintained it at 100KLD = 92KLD Fresh + 8KLD treated water.

[10] 4000lts per day for Filter Back-wash; after washing this water will remain there

only, what is being proposed to “Treat” this water & how to handle the

rejects/residue thus being obtained?

[11] How much is diesel required for 6hrs a day operation of DG sets? Its storage,

necessary permissions & the safety measures to be installed or taken care

[12] Pt. 8.1/9.1/9.5/9.6/9.7 of Form 1-A to be explained properly



raised observation within 15 days.

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for API Manufacturing Project “Kaiser

Life” located at Village Dabkauri, Tehsil & Distt. Panchkula,

Haryana by M/s Kaiser life.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for API Manufacturing

Project “Kaiser Life” located at Village Dabkauri, Tehsil & Distt. Panchkula, Haryana.



Reference of MoEF & CC with additional specific conditions as under:

1. The PP should submit total CO2 emission from the project.

2. The PP should submit online analyses for air emission and for the ETP.

Item No.[16] Extension from renewal of Environment Clearance for “Freedom

Park Life” Group Housing, Sector-57, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Countrywide Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended this project for deciding the Environment Clearance

case as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017. SEIAA may take a final view in the

matter.

In the today’s meeting after detailed deliberation the authority decided to call the

authorized representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next meeting

to justify their claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.

*******

1

Minutes of the 104thmeeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority held on.

21st June, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.), Chairman,

SEIAA held in the meeting room of office of SEIAA Haryana, Sector-2 Panchkula,

regarding Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification dated 14.9.2006.


Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated vide letter No.

394-396 dated 13.06.2017 were discussed following decisions were taken:-

Item No.[1] Environment Clearance for proposed expansion of Clinker Grinding Unit

(1.5 to 2.5 Million TPA) along with installation of Captive Power Plant (10

MW) near village Khukhrana, P.O.Assan Kalan, District-Panipat

(Haryana) by M/s Shree Cement Ltd.

The SEAC has recommended to file this case as withdrawal in its 150th meeting held on

06.04.2017 as per the request by the project proponent.

The case was lastly considered in the 102nd meeting in the SEIAA. The Authority as gone

through the case and related facts, therefore the Authority asked project proponent to submit an

affidavit stating that there will not be any Capacity enhancement in the Clinker Grinding Unit

and no proposed captive Power plant would be installed. Further, the pp has been asked to

submit the units of power consumed in the financial year 2014-15 and 2015-16.

The project proponent submitted the reply on 24.05.2017 which was taken up for

consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority decided to accept the recommendation of

SEAC for withdrawal of the application as requested by project proponent.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio Medical Waste

Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, Village

BazidaJatan, near railway crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal, Haryana by

M/s. Haat Supreme Wastech Pvt. Ltd.

The SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” in its 100th meeting held on 01.03.2017

and also decided that the project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and

regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR studies.


consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply and the

authority listened patiently to the representative of the project proponent and accepted all the

documents submitted at the time of hearing. Authority needs some more time to study and

discuss the submissions made by project proponent. Therefore, the case has been deferred.

Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste

Treatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1 kite. No

50, Tadadi No 314, village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala, District

Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Esskay Hygienic Services.

The SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” in its 100th meeting held on 01.03.2017

and also decided that the project proponent should present a case to SEIAA stating the rule and

regulations whereby public hearing is not required in such cases, well before of the TOR studies.




2



Item No.[4] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical Waste

Treatment Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz KaMeo Industrial area,

Sohna, Mewat, Haryana by Synergy Waste Management Pvt. Ltd.

The SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” in its 100th meeting held on 01.03.201.

The project proponent submits the representation on 01.05.2017 which was taken up for





Item No.[5] Environmental Clearance for construction of Group Housing Complex at

Sector-36-A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Bluejays Realtech Pvt. Ltd.

The case was considered in the 101st meeting after the detailed deliberation the Authority

decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra,

Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as

indicated above within 15 days period. The site visit report submitted by the committee is as

under:

Site Visit Report

The sub-committee inspected the site on dated 06.05.2017 in presence of the

representative of the project and the matter was discussed with them about the status of site. The

following activities were observed by the sub-committee:

1. On one side there was old RCC wall which was separating the premises of adjoining

HSIIDC land from the project area. From the local enquiry it revealed that this wall was

constructed by HSIIDC since long.

2. A temporary sign board was installed by PP outside the project area for advertisement of

the project.

3. A temporary port cabin (guard room cum office) of 20X15 ft was erected in the project

area for stay of guards at the site. It was informed by the PP that this will be dismantled

as soon as the construction work will start at site.

4. Some excavation was seen along the plot which was done by the local administration to

lay the water supply pipe line.

5. No construction activity related to the approved building plan was observed.

The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and finding no reason to disagree

with recommendations of SEAC in this case the Authority decided to de-list this case. It was also

decided that the decision of the Authority should be conveyed to the Project Proponent and copy

of the same be forwarded to the Haryana State Pollution Control Board, DGTCP, Haryana &

R.O. MOEF, GOI for information and necessary action.

3

Item No.[6] Environmental Clearance for Commercial Colony Project at Vill-

Badshahpur, Sector-67, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Khanna Developers

Pvt. Ltd.

The case was lastly considered in the 103rd meeting of SEIAA held on 17.05.2017 and



consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply. It was observed

by the Authority that still some clarifications are needed about the following:

Reply to Query no. 3

“The re-circulating water doesn't require any further treatment. Tolerance level of any cooling

tower as per manufacturing is 5O ppm. Whereas, we are proposing to achieve zero ppm hardness

in treated water which will be used in the cooling tower.When the hardness increases to 50 ppm

due to constant evaporation process. Then this water will be drained out to softener feed tank for

further reduction of hardness by treating through softener”.

Explain the above submission made by project proponent.

The query was “How would you be treating the water to make it fit for HVAC cooling tower?”

What is being construed of the above statement is if TDS of circulating water increases beyond

50 ppm, it will be treated by softener. Even the fresh water has more than 50 ppm of TDS and

that was the query, this water will be passed through softener or some other device, which are

those &what is the plan to handle the rejects & residue ? Submit the Schematic Diagram

Reply to Query 4

4 KLD for Filter back-wash, very much in excess & back-washing cannot be a daily

practice

Reply to Query 6

“Moreover the water used is treated water from STP and not fresh water and water is

continuously under re-circulation with provision of makeup water only, hence there is no

wastage”.

If there is no wastage & water is continuously in circulation then why 8000 Lts of water

is required on daily basis?

Reply to Query 7

“The water piping is designed to take care of maintaining the residue, however please note the

treated water is under continuous circulation during the working hours of the DG sets”

Please explain the design of piping & how is it maintaining the residue?

In view of the above, the Authority decided to agree with the recommendations of SEAC

and EC would be accorded provided project proponent submits the satisfactory clarification to

the above raised observations within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall

supply the copies of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC

letter shall be issued.

4

Item No.[7] Extension from renewal of Environment Clearance for “Freedom Park Life”

Group Housing, Sector-57, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Countrywide

Promoters Pvt. Ltd.

The case was considered in the last meeting andthe authority decided to call the authorized

representative of the project proponent to appear in person in the next meeting to justify their

claim. Accordingly the case was deferred to the next meeting.

The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting in the presence of the representative of

the project proponent wherein the main issue was raised with respect to the component of Green

area in the Group Housing. The representative of the project proponent informed to the authority

that they have providing green area more than the area which was approved in the building plans

and also intimated that no specific condition regarding provision for Green to the tune of 30% was

mentioned in the EC letter.

After detailed deliberations, the authority decided to defer this case with the decision that

Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for

inspection as indicated above and shall submit the report within 15 days.

Item No.[8] Environment Clearance for proposed Expansion of Sarvodaya Hospital &

Research Centre (A Unit of Anshu Hospital Ltd.) At Site No. 1, Sector-08 at

Faridabad by M/s Anshu Hospitals Limited.

The case was considered in the 103rd meeting after the detailed deliberation the authority

decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. A. K.Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra,

Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report within 15 days

period.

The sub-committee inspected the site on 03.06.2017 in presence of the representatives of

the project proponent. The status of project site compliances of EC conditions was discussed

with them. The following observations are made:

1. The construction of the project was carried out as per plan. Block-A & B has been

constructed, while no construction has been done in block C & D. No extra construction

has been carried out (Annexure-I)

2. Two tube wells are under operation for which month monthly charges are paid to MCF

(annexure-II).

3. Three water connections from HUDA exist for which monthly charges are being paid.

The water consumption is within the prescribed limit (Annexure-III)

4. Hospital has proper waste water disposal connection and receipt of MCF was shown

(Annexure-IV).

5. Three rain water harvesting pits have been constructed and are connected to storm water

drain.

6. The STP was found under running condition and no re-use of treated waste water was

found.

7. Fire NOC from competent authority has been taken and attached (Annexure-V).

8. Disposal of solid waste is being done by M/s Trigun Services (annexure-VI).

9. The disposal of bio-medical waste is being done by M/s Golden Eagle Waste

Management Pvt. Ltd, an authorized vendor (annexure-VII).

5

The matter was taken up for consideration in the today’s meeting, the authority studied

the site visit report submitted on 13.06.2017 the authority observed that the sub-committee has

not reported any violation except no re-use of treated water. Authority unanimously decided that

case to be referred back to SEAC for appraisal with the condition that project proponent must re-

use the treated water through duel plumbing. The SEAC may recommend the case on merit as

per procedure prescribed in the Notification and time to time guidelines issued by MOEF & CC,

GOI.

Item No.[9] Extension of environment clearance for Group Housing Colony project at

Village Gwal Pahari, Sector-2, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Jasmine

Buildmart Pvt. Ltd.

1. The project proponent submitted application on 30.11.2015 for seeking environment

clearance for the project as indicated above.

2. The SEAC in its 152nd meeting held on 29.05.2017 recommended this project for



1. Plot area 49852.01sqm (12.3185 acres)



4. Nos. of Towers 5 Towers, 1 basement + G + 24 Floors, Retail

area, Residential Dwelling Units and EWS

Units.

5. Dwelling units 176 DU, 32 EWS







12. Power Requirement 2600 KW DHBVN


14. Parking 434 ECS

15. RWH 10 pits



belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of Forest land,

recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic circulation etc. It was observed by the Authority

that:

[1] Form 1A

• The various points under 8.1, 9.1, 9.3, 9.5, & 9.7 under Form-1A not explained properly.

Explain & elaborate the same.

• Address mentioned on Form 1 shows above mentioned project is located in sector-2 but

AAQ reports submitted on page 100-102 are of sector-3; is it same?

• The samples of air collected to calculate the “Ground Level Concentration” should have

been representative in nature but the samples collected on 19.02.2016 show PM2.5 &

PM10 44.26/40.85/43.84 & 91.89/82.07/84.20 µg/m3respectively definitely below the

limits of NAAQS but contradicts the data shown at HSPCB, Gurugram site

6

http://hspcb.gov.in/AAQD.html. The status of ambient air quality in NCR is as such all

over the media then why should it be accepted the said AAQ at sector-2/3 of Gurugram?

Explain the contradiction

• Pt.5.1; submitted to install 6 DG Sets capacity totaling to 4000KVA; to calculate

additional ground level concentration the individual capacity of DG sets is required then

how it has been calculated without knowing the individual capacity of DG sets?

[2] Calculations of daily water Demand

Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF & CC for Water use reduction as given in

Table:2.4

• Water demand for cooling of DG sets remained constant i.e. 27 KLD in all three seasons.

. The process of cooling involves evaporation of water and the rate of evaporation

depends upon the ambient temperature, therefore, the quantity of water required for

HVAC cooling in winter would be quite less..

• Secondly, due to evaporation concentration of dissolved salts will increase in circulating

water, what mechanism is proposed to treat this water & how to handle the

residual/rejects? Submit schematic plan.

Location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan

Incorporate the above mentioned suggestions and resubmit the “Water Balance Diagram” of all

three seasons separately.

[3] Installation of DG set:

4000 KVA DG sets are proposed to be installed; transportation, storage & handling of

such large volume of HSD; status of statutory compliances & safety measures to be

taken.

[4] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra

Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit


(i) Mitigation measures taken to reduce Noise & Air pollution.



(iv) The use of treated water in construction or wherever required and no extraction of ground

water.

(v) Functioning of STP and management of treated waste water in the existing

project.

(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste & construction waste.

(vii) The existence of temporary soil bank made out of the excavation.

(viii) The no. & status of RWH pits in existing project.

(ix) Provisions & safety measures taken for storage of Diesel.

And may point out any anomaly which can deteriorate environment and comes under the

ambit of “Environment Clearance”.

http://hspcb.gov.in/AAQD.html

7


decision that the project proponent may be asked to submit satisfactory reply to the above raised

observation from Sr. No. 1 to 3 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh.

R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the

points as indicated above within 15 days period.

Item No.[10] Environment Clearance for mining of (Boulder, Gravel & Sand) at Begampur

Block/YNR B-37, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar (Haryana)

by M/s Yamuna Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd,

The SEAC has recommended this case for Environment Clearance for mining of

(Boulder, Gravel & Sand) at Begampur Block/YNR B-37, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna

Nagar (Haryana) by imposing stipulations stated therein.





3. The project proponent has been granted lease through auction by (Boulder, Gravel&

Sand) at Begampur Block/YNR B-37, Tehsil-Chhachhrauli, District-Yamuna Nagar

(Haryana) for a period of 08 years vide letter dated 19.06.2015.

4. The project proponent has submitted copy of approved Mining Plan, NOC from Forest

Department.

5. The proposed production is 7, 11, 000 TPA for first 5 years. The water requirement is 52

KLD.

6. The project proponent has proposed to plant 1000 plants saplings for every year for 5



was observed by the Authority that:

[1] The project proponent should submit the arrangement to be made to ensure that no

seepage of diesel/spent oil would take place.

[2] The project proponent should submit the plan for transportation and storage of diesel and

related safety measures.

[3] The pp should submit a plan to ensure that no fugitive emission would take place due to

plying of vehicles/movement of machineries.





letter shall be issued by the office.

Item No.[11] Environment Clearance for Group Housing colony located at village

NangliUmarpur, Sector -62, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Emaar MGF Land

Limited.



8




1. Plot area 56757.15sqm


3. License Valid up 01.12.2015 and applied of renewal of

license (EDC/IDC payment slips attached)

4. Nos. of Towers 6 Towers, 2 basement + GF + 29 Floors,

convenient shopping, community center, club,

service personals

5. Height 100 Meter

6. Green belt 30%





11 Power Requirement 5296 KW (Phase-I – 3369 KW & Phase-II-

1927 KW)

12. Solid Waste 1373.2 kg/day (phase I- 941.33, phase-II -

431.862)

13. Parking 1273 ECS (phase I- 748, phase-II -525)

14. RWH 20 pits





that:

DG Sets

The following anomaly has been observed in the given data for DG sets

Form 1A & EIA studies undertaken show the capacity & number of DG sets as Phase-1(2x500 +

2x320) =1640 KVA & Phase-2(3x380)=1140 KVA, total capacity 2780 KVA. But in reply to

Query-2 raised by SEAC during its 146th Meeting dated 14/12/16; in annexure-II capacity of DG

sets shown are Phase-1(2x1500 + 1x500)=3500 KVA & Phase-2(2x1010 + 1x380)=2400 KVA,

total capacity 5900 KVA.

Even the Water Demand for Cooling of DG sets has been raised from (9+6)=15 KLD to

(19+12.96)=31.96KLD.

What is the actual proposed capacity of various DG sets proposed to be installed?

Compute the “water Demand” for cooling on the basis of actual proposed capacity of

various DG sets & submit the computation/calculations.

On what basis (Capacity of DG sets) the “Air Dispersion Modelling” has been done as

the stack emission depends upon the burning of fuel or upon capacity?

Calculations of daily water Demand

Would Water demand for cooling of DG sets remained constant in all three seasons? The

process of cooling involves evaporation of water and the rate of evaporation depends

9

upon the ambient temperature, therefore, the quantity of water required for HVAC

cooling in Winter would be quite less .

Location of Cooling Tower on lay-out plan

Secondly, due to evaporation concentration of dissolved salts will increase in circulating

water, what mechanism is proposed to treat this water & how to handle the

residual/rejects? Submit schematic plan.

Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF & CC for Water Use reduction as given in

Table:2.4

Form-1A

The explanation under the headings 5.4, 9.3, 9.5, 9.6 & 9.9 of Form-1A are not proper&

well elaborated. Explain & elaborate.


decision that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15

days period.

Item No.[12] Environment Clearance for expansion of Group Housing Complex at Sector-

88A 89A, Village-Harsaru, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Oasis

Buildhome Pvt. Ltd.






1. Plot area 59423.98 sqm (Existing 55680.69 sqm,

additional 3743.29 sqm )

2. Built up area 157098.09 sqm (under construction –

121361.25 sqm, additional 35736.844 sqm)


4. Nos. of Towers 10 Towers + EWS, 2 basement + GF + 31

Floors, Dwelling Units, EWS, Servant Unit,

Nursery School, Community Building & Club,

Convenient shopping.






10. STP Capacity 4 STPs (310 + 250 + 8 + 75 KLD)

11 Power Requirement 6400.52 KW

12. Solid Waste 2133 kg/day 2 nos. of OWC 1493 kg/day

13. ECS 1363 ECS

14. RWH 16 pits



belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding non-involvement of forest land,

10


that:

1. ToR

Appln. For TOR submitted on 18/04/16

Base-line data collection from March to May,2016

ToR approved on 12/07/16

The Authority during its meeting found out that the application for “Terms of

Reference” submitted on 18.04.2016 and as per available records; the collection of

baseline data has started from March 2016; more than a month and half earlier. Secondly,

the mean value of PM2.5 depicted on pg.no. 184/185 is 52.7 & 57.1 µg/mt3, well within

the permissible limit of NAAQS. The data collected from 01/03/16 to 25/05/16; this

being Harvesting season& temperature rises with possibility of high velocity winds with

dust. Secondly, as such there is a big concern about the deteriorating ambient quality of

NCR region due to increase in particulate matter in the ambient air. Data (2015-17) of

VikasSadan, Gurgaon, taken from HSPCB website shows average value of PM 2.5 as

97.25/102.59/96.08 µg/m3 in March-May,2016 respectively.


This all leads the authority to the conclusion that as season for baseline

environment study (March to May) was expiring so the data collection date has been

shown 48 days earlier to make up the deficiency. Even the reports submitted contradict

the present level of “Particulate matters” with the available data on the HSPCB website

“http://hspcb.gov.in/AAQD.html”.

On the basis of above written facts authority construes that the samples might

have not been drawn and the findings are not of representative in nature. Hence,

Authority directs project proponent to recollect the data during coming post monsoon

season and resubmit.

2. Water balance Chart

Construction phase

Tyre washing 162 lts/truck, put “Water Trough” to conserve water & for washing of

Tyres

Operation phase

Canopy area 25 Sq.mt. meaning thereby the radius would be 2.82 mts , therefore the

distance between two trees to be at least 5.64 mts. Submit the tree plantation plan

Proposal is to grow native species, do these require so much of the water on daily basis?

Water is scarce& precious source conserve it by meticulous planning

Wet scrubber, where it is being installed, design & capacity of the same

Miscellaneous needs of water consumption be explained properly

Location & carrying capacity of “External Sewer”

[3] It was also decided that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra

Members SEACshall visit the site for inspection of existing project and shall submit




11

(i) Water balance diagram of existing project and proposed project for expansion.


(iii) Status of construction in expansion part if any.

(iv) The construction of the existing project has been carried out by using treated water.


(vi) Management of Municipal Solid waste.

And may point out any anomaly which can deteriorate environment and comes under the

ambit of “Environment Clearance”.



observation from Sr. No. 1 to 2 within 15 days and Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and

Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on


Item No.[13] Environment Clearance for construction of Cyber Park Colony in the revenue

estate of Village Behrampur, Sector-58, Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex,

Haryana by M/s Basic Developers Pvt. Ltd.






1. Plot area 39127.981 sqm (9.6687 Acre)

2. Built up area 178646.057 sqn


4. Nos. of Towers 06 Blocks , 3 basements + G/S + maximum 26

Floors

5. Height 124 Meter






11 Power Requirement 16814 KVA


13. ECS 2634 ECS

14. RWH 9 pits





that:

1. Water Balance Diagram

Six blocks have been proposed in Form 1A with HVAC system installed in each. The

quantity of water required as follows

12

Block-1 Block-2 Block-3 Block-4 Block-5 Block-6 Total

HVAC(KLD) 8 130 50 80 10 7 285

Filter Back-

Wash(KLD)

1 6 5 5 1 1 19

Total water required for HVAC cooling was 285KLD & for filter back-wash 19KLD

Query no. 6 raised during 151st Meeting of SEAC held on 02/05/17; PP was supposed

to submit detail Computation of HVAC requirement & reduce fresh water requirement.

But no computation was provided, fresh water demand was reduced from 392KLD to

299 KLD out of which 173 KLD was proposed for HVAC cooling, initially it was 241

KLD

Query no. 2 raised during 152nd Meeting of SEAC held on 30/05/17; PP was supposed

to resubmit detail Computation of HVAC requirement & reduce fresh water

requirement; again no computations were submitted but fresh water demand was

reduced from 299 to 245 KLD by reducing the requirement of fresh water for HVAC

cooling from 173 to 119KLD.

Is there any basis of calculating water demand for HVAC cooling or it is being

submitted arbitrarily? Show the calculation and computation on which basis this

quantity of water is derived. And the fresh water for the cooling purposes cannot be

allowed as the availability of treated water is in penalty but “Fresh/potable water” is

very scarce; hence, water being day scarce resource that must be conserve.

Filter back-wash cannot be a regular phenomenon, where the water after washing will

lead to definitely not going to vanish or consumed in process.

Reply to query 2 raised during the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 30/05/17

shows126KLD water needed for HVAC Cooling. The process of cooling involves

evaporation of water and the rate of evaporation depends upon the ambient temperature,

therefore, the quantity of water required for HVAC cooling in Winter would be quite

less than in summer. Secondly, due to evaporation concentration of dissolved salts will

increase in circulating water, what mechanism is proposed to treat this water & how to

handle the residual/rejects? Submit schematic plan.

Water is a scarce resource, therefore, why to use 119,000lts of fresh/potable water for

cooling purposes that too on daily basis. Use treated water only

Location of Cooling Tower on Lay-out plan.

Incorporate the above said and resubmit “Water Balance Diagrams” for all three seasons

separately.

2. Installation of DG:

8 DG sets of 1500 KVA are proposed to be installed; transportation, storage & handling

of such large volume of HSD; status of statutory compliances & safety measured to be

taken

13




Item No.[14] Environment Clearance for Revision &Expansion of Group Housing Colony

“RahejaRevanta”, Village-Shikohpur, Sector-78, Dist. Gurgaon-Manesar

Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s Raheja Developers Ltd.







2. Built up area 297575.867 sqn (Existing 146173.074 +

Expansion 151402.793 sqm)


4. Nos. of Towers 03 Towers, Low rise blocks, 2 Basements +GF

+ maximum 50 floors, Nursery school, EWS

Building, Commercial Building, Community

Block

5. Height 204 Meter






11 Power Requirement 10812 KVA


13. ECS 1775 ECS

14. RWH 18 pits





that:

[1] Query no.5; raised by SEAC in its 150th meeting held on 06/04/17, “PP should submit

revised fresh water requirement & Water Balance Diagram. PP submitted the reply in the

form of “Water balance Diagrams” as Annexure-IV

Main document Revised plan

Total water requirement 1080KLD 1171KLD *Total Fresh Water needed 666.1KLD 639.715KLD

Waste Water 811.78KLD 869.292KLD

*Reduction in the consumption of “Fresh water Requirement” is achieved on paper by

reducing “Total Occupancy” from 6963 to 6523; visitors from 696 to 652 instead it

should have been achieved by incorporating the MoEF recommendations for “Water Use

Reduction” as given in Table 2.4. How did the projection of occupancy & visitors level

dip, any calculations to show?

14

Horticulture initially needing 6lts/mt2, revised to 7.5 lts/mt2, why so? What about winter

& monsoon seasons.

In revision need of “Treated Water” for Car Washing etc. has been removed

Water required for flushing is raised from 30-33.33% of domestic consumption, how?

The given data in revision does not lead to reduction in consumption of water which

should have been as per the recommendations of MoEF & CC given in Table 2.4

20 KLD of Fresh water for swimming pool, water in pool or water bodies is lost due to

evaporation so it is needed for replenishment not for replacement as is shown in revised

plan. What is the total cross-sectional area of pool/water bodies on its basis calculate the

water requirement?

[2] Form 1A

Explain pt. 8.3 , 9.1,9.3,9.5 & 9.7 properly.

[3] The project proponent should submit the copy of valid license.




Item No.[15] Environment Clearance for construction of Affordable Group Housing

located at Villlage-Ullahawas, Sector-62, Gurgaon-Manesar Urban

Complex, Haryana by M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.









4. Nos. of Towers The project comprise of Housing, Commercial

Area, Aanganwadi and Community area









13. ECS 370 ECS or 740 no. of two wheelers

14. RWH 7 pits





that:

15

Water balance Chart

The query no. 5 raised during the 150th meeting of SEAC to submit detailed “Water

Conservation Plan”; PP replied “Same is enclosed in Annexure-V”

Even in reply of Query no.6 “Submit revised Fresh water Requirement & Water balance

Diagram”; PP indicated Annexure-V

Annexure-V has two Water Balance diagrams one “Without conservation”(Not initially

submitted) & other “With Conservation”. With conservation is replica of what initially

on pg.no. 41 of main document is submitted (65 LPCD). Secondly, Fresh water

requirement remained constant at 253 KLD for all the seasons and is same as submitted

in Main document. Then, What & Where is the “Revised Fresh water requirement” and

what about the “Water Conservation plan”, how it is different from the plan submitted

initially

DG Cooling requires 5 KLD of water, very much on the higher side. Secondly, there will

be an increase in concentration of salt in the circulating water due to evaporation. Give

Schematic plan to treat this water & to handle the residue/rejects . The capacity of DG

sets indicated (200 KVA,125 & 100 KVA) does not require cooling tower; can be Air

Cooled

Sludge & evaporation losses are very much on higher side (30 KLD). Secondly,

evaporation losses are temperature (ambient) dependent so cannot be constant throughout

the year

Form 1A

The details of back ground air quality levels with predicted values based on dispersion

models taking into account the increased traffic generation not provided

Explain pt. 8.1,8.3 & 9.1 properly




Item No.[16] Environment Clearance for construction of Warehouse Project at Village

Pathreri, Tehsil-Manesar, District-Gurgao, Haryana by M/s JKS









3. CLU Valid up 25.08.2018

4. Ware house Ware house non agro logistics


16






11 Power Requirement 1500 KVA HVPNL


13. ECS 17986.25 sqm

14. RWH 26 pits





that:

Form 1A


models taking into account the increased traffic generation as a result of the proposed

project for ware house. Due to the movement of heavy vehicles the particles will grind&

regrind giving rise to increase in PM; how much it is predicted on the basis of study

undertaken? What is the back ground value & what would be additional Ground level

concentration leading to Total GLC?

Explain pt. 8.3 , 9.1,9.3,9.5 & 9.7 properly






Item No.[17] Environment Clearance for construction of commercial Colony (3.5035 Acre)

namely “Boulvard Project” located at Village Daulatabad, Sector-106,

Gurgaon, Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Magic Eye Developers Pvt. Ltd.









4. Nos. of Towers 2 Basements +GF + 19 floors. The project

comprise of Service Apartments (1BHK

Apartments-224 Bis, abd 2 BHK apartments -

120 Nos.)



17







13. ECS 509 ECS

14. RWH 3 pits





that:

Water balance Diagram

Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as in Table

2.4

The water required for Horticulture is very much on higher side, it has to be season

dependent. Resubmit the water balance chart incorporating the recommendations on

“water use Reduction” for different seasons separately

Location & carrying capacity of “External sewer” where 32 KLD treated water is

supposed to be discharged

Form 1A

Provide the details & data as asked under pt. 5.1. Test report dtd. 12/04/17 on page no.

174 shows value of PM2.5& PM10 as 47.55 &98.83 µg/m3 respectively, well below the

norms of NAAQS. Submit some documents to substantiate & corroborate the findings

Provide the details as asked under pt. 8.1

Submission under pt. 8.3 is to use “Fly-ash” for road construction. What types of the

equipment are proposed to handle, store the same & to prevent the fugitive emission?

Provide the details as asked under pt. 9.1,9.3,9.5,9.6 & 9.7





Colony located at Village Wazirpur, Sector-92, Distruct-Gurugram, Haryana

by M/s GLS Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.







18



4. Nos. of Towers 1 Basement +GF + 12 floors. The project

comprise of Residential Towers (912 DU).,

commercial area, Aanganwadi and Club House






10. STP Capacity 2 STPs 535 KLD +150 KLD

11 Power Requirement 4357.46 KVA DHBVN


13. ECS 474 ECS

14. RWH 6 pits





that:


Water is a scarce resource, must be conserved; Incorporate the recommendations of

MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as in Table 2.4

DG Cooling requires 22KLD of water, very much on the higher side. Secondly, there will

be an increase in concentration of salt in the circulating water due to evaporation. Give

Schematic plan to treat this water & to handle the residue/rejects .

Sludge & evaporation losses are very much on higher side (71KLD). Secondly,


the year

Location of cooling tower on the lay-out may be shown

Form 1A

Provide the details as asked under pt. 9.5







Project at Sector-78, Faridabad, Haryana by M/s Conscient Infrastructure

Pvt. Ltd.





19





4. Nos. of Towers 19 Blocks (10 residential + 8 commercial + 1

Community) 1 Basement +GF + 14 floors.

DU –1021








12. Solid Waste 2.95 TPD

13. ECS 570 ECS

14. RWH 10 pits





that:


Provide the water balance diagram for different seasons i.e. Summer, monsoon & winter

separately; incorporate the recommendations of MoEF&CC for “Water Use Reduction”

Location & Carrying capacity of the external sewer

Energy conservation

Provide Assumed Power Consumption per sq. ft. of built-up area

Explain pt. 9.5 & 9.8 properly of Form-1A







Colony “Global Hill View” located at Village Sohna, Sector-11, Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s V.K.Motors Pvt. Ltd.






1. Plot area 21903.61sqm (5.4125)

20



4. Nos. of Towers 5 towers, S + 19 Floors. The project comprise

of Housing, Commercial Area, Aanganwadi

and Community area









13. ECS 380 ECS or 760 nos. of two wheeler

14. RWH 6 pits





that:


Water is a scarce resource, must be conserved; 125 & 320KVA DG sets can be air cooled

no need of having Cooling Tower & evaporating 3000lts of water per day

Sludge & evaporation losses are very much on higher side (43KLD). Secondly,


the year

Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF regarding “Water Use Reduction” as in Table

2.4

Form 1A

Provide the details as asked under pt. 8.1 & 9.5






Item No.[21] Environment Clearance for construction of Warehouse other than

agriculture produce located at Village-Pathreri, District-Gurgaon, Haryana

by M/s GLS Logistics Pvt. Ltd.






1. Plot area 102859.13sqm (24.41Acre)

21


3. CLU Valid up 03.08.2018

4. Nos. of Towers 5 Blocks, GF + 03 Floors.









13. ECS 619 ECS

14. RWH 29 pits





that:

Form 1A


models taking into account the increased traffic generation not provided

Secondly, the proposed project is of “Ware House”, will result into increased movement

of heavy vehicles and the dust particles will grind & regrind to give rise to increase in air

pollution. What steps are being proposed & implemented to mitigate it?

Submission under pt. 8.3 is to use “Fly-ash” for road construction. What types of the

equipment are proposed to handle, store the same & to prevent the fugitive emission?

Provide the details as asked under pt. 9.1,9.2,9.5 & 9.11




ADDITIONAL AGENDA:-

Item No.[22] Request to transfer Environment Clearance granted in favour of M/s

Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd for development of Commercial Colony on an

area of 3.15 acres at Village Hayatpur, Sector-93, Gurgaon in the name of

M/s Ameya Commercial Projetcs Pvt. Ltd.

The SEIAA vide letter dated 09.03.2017 granted Environment Clearance for the

construction of Commercial colony on an area of 3.15 acres with (Total plot area 12,747.58 sq.

Mtrs and proposed built-up area 38,848.677 sq. Mtrs) in the revenue estate of village Hayatpur,

Sector -93, Gurgaon,Haryana by M/s Pyramid Infratech Pvt. Ltd, 374, UdyogVihar, Phase-4,

Sector-18, Gurgaon, Haryana. The project proponent has requested to transfer the environment

clearance in the name of M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd as the license pertaining to

the project has been transferred in the name of M/s Ameya Commercial Projects Pvt. Ltd by

Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana.

22

It is pertinent to mention here that SEIAA vide letter dated 10.03.2017 granted

environment Clearance for the construction of Commercial Complex Colony on an area of 2.5

( Total Plot area 10117.125 Sqm and Total Built-up area 32639.054 Sqm) acres in the revenue

estate of village Mewaka, Sector-92, Gurgaon, Haryana to M/s Ameya Commercial Projects

Pvt. Ltd. The Total Plot area of the both project is 12747.58+10117.125=22864.705 Sqm. and

the total built-up area is 38,848.677+32639.054=71487.731 Sqm.

As per para 11 of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 there is provision for the transfer of

the Environment Clearance letter. The relevant para of EIA Notification is reproduced is as

under:-

11. Transferability of Environmental Clearance (EC):

A prior environmental clearance granted for a specific project or activity to an applicant

may be transferred during its validity to another legal person entitled to undertake the project

or activity on application by the transferor, or by the transferee with a written “no objection”

by the transferor, to, and by the regulatory authority concerned, on the same terms and

conditions under which the prior environmental clearance was initially granted, and for the

same validity period. No reference to the Expert Appraisal Committee or State Level Expert

Appraisal Committee concerned is necessary in such cases.

The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the authority decided to Sh.

Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N. Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for

inspection and shall submit the ascertain facts of the project within 15 days period.

******

1

CORRECTED MOM DUE TO SOME TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR

Minutes of the 105thmeeting of State Environment Impact Assessment Authority

held on. 24thJuly, 2017 under the Chairmanship Sh. Bharat Bhushan IAS (Retd.),



14.9.2006.

The entire Authority is present. The project proposals as recommended by SEAC

for Environmental Clearance or otherwise and listed in the Agenda item circulated

vide letter No. 465 to 467 dated 18.07.2017 were discussed following decisions were

taken:-

Item No.[1] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio Medical WasteTreatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khatoni No. 157, VillageBazidaJatan, near railway crossing, Tehsil & District-Karnal, Haryanaby M/s. Haat Supreme Wastech Pvt. Ltd.

The case was considered in the last meeting and the Authority needs some

more time to study and discuss the submissions made by project proponent.

Therefore, the case was deferred.

The case has been taken up in the today’s meeting and the Authority had

elaborate discussions on the subject and needs more time to decide whether there

should be public hearing or not. Therefore, the case has been deferred.

Item No.[2] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical WasteTreatment Facility (CBWTF) located at Khewat no 1, Khatoni no 1kite. No 50, Tadadi No 314, village VPO Bagwala, Tehsil Barwala,District Panchkula, Haryana by M/s Esskay Hygienic Services.







Item No.[3] Environmental Clearance for proposed Common Bio-Medical WasteTreatment Facility (CBWTF), at Plot no. 66, Roz KaMeo Industrialarea, Sohna, Mewat, Haryana by Synergy Waste Management Pvt.Ltd.




2




Item No.[4] Environment Clearance for construction of Cyber Park Colony in therevenue estate of Village Behrampur, Sector-58, Gurgaon-ManesarUrban Complex, Haryana by M/s Basic Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The case was initially taken up in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on

21.06.2017 as certain queries were raised regarding computation of requirement of

water for cooling tower of HVAC & DG sets and for the storage of HSD for

proposed DG sets so, the case was deferred.

The project proponent on 21.07.2017 submitted the reply which was taken up

for consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied, discussed the reply.

It was observed by the Authority that the proposed HVAC and the DG sets will be

air cooled therefore no requirement of water for cooling towers; subsequently

project proponent has submitted the separate water balance chart for different

seasons and reduced the total water requirement to 437 KLD. The project

proponent further stated that the statutory compliances for the storage of HSD will

be duly obtained. Even project proponent submitted an undertaking in this regard.

On the basis of satisfactory reply to the queries and the case being appraised

& recommended by SEAC; the Authority decided to accord Environment Clearance

to this project.

Item No.[5] Environment Clearance for Revision & Expansion of Group HousingColony “Raheja Revanta”, Village-Shikohpur, Sector-78, Dist.Gurgaon-Manesar Urban Complex, Haryana by M/s RahejaDevelopers Ltd.


21.06.2017 and queries regarding the requirement of water and proper reply to the

certain points in Form-IA were raised. The project proponent has submitted reply

and incorporated the MoEF & CC Guidelines for reduction of water consumption,

thereby, reducing the fresh water demand to 413 KLD and has reduced the make-up

water for the swimming pool to 4 KLD and submitted separate water balance

diagram for the all three seasons. Further, project proponent has submitted an

affidavit not to discharge untreated effluent/water in the external sewer and made

the submission that till time sewer is not provided by the concerned authority

project proponent will make its own arrangement for the disposal/discharge of

excess treated water.

3

On the basis of the appraisal & recommendation made by SEAC and the

satisfactory reply to the queries, the Authority decided to accord Environment



located at Villlage-Ullahawas, Sector-62, Gurgaon-Manesar Urban

Complex, Haryana by M/s Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.


21.06.2017 and queries regarding the requirement of water and proper reply to the

certain points in Form-IA were raised. The project proponent has submitted the

water balance diagram with the conservation plan and agreed to have air cooled DG

sets. Further, project proponent has reduced the sludge and evaporation losses to

1.53 / 1.37 / 0.97 KLD depending upon the season. The recalculated estimated fresh

water demand is 253 KLD. The project proponent has submitted the undertakings

regarding installation of air cooled DG sets and for the discharge of excess treated

water in external sewer provided by the concerned authorities and to make

adequate arrangement for the same till the external sewer is provided. Subsequently

project proponent has elaborated all the raised the points pertaining to Form IA.

On the basis of the case being apprised & recommended by SEAC and

satisfactory reply to the queries the Authority decided to accord Environment


Item No.[7] Environment Clearance for construction of commercial Colony (3.5035Acre) namely “Boulvard Project” located at Village Daulatabad,Sector-106, Gurgaon, Manesar Urban Complex by M/s Magic EyeDevelopers Pvt. Ltd.


21.06.2017 and the project proponent was asked to incorporate the

recommendations of MoEF& CC for water use reduction as in table 2.4 and project

proponent was asked to submit the details of background air quality levels with

predicted values based on dispersion models and to elaborate certain points in Form

IA. The project proponent has submitted the reply after incorporating the

recommendations of MoEF & CC on water use reduction leading to fresh water

requirement to 61 KLD; even the water required for horticulture is reduced to

5.5/1.8/0.5lts/sqmt of green area depending upon the season. The project proponent

has submitted the undertaking regarding discharge of excess treated water to

external sewer provided by the concerned authorities and to make adequate

arrangement at its owntill the sewer is provided by the concerned authorities. The

project proponent was asked to verify the results submitted for the particulate

matters; project proponent has submitted the report of the fresh sample taken on

15th July 2017; the values of PM 2.5 shown to be 47.55 and 69.2 µg/m3and 98.8 & 126

4

µg/m3 for PM 10 respectively, the results seems to be on the higher side of NAAQS.

The project proponent is suggested to take adequate measure to suppress the

particulate matter arising due to increase volume of traffic circulation in the

proposed project.

On the basis of the reply to the queries, appraisal & recommendation of

SEAC the Authority decided to accord Environment Clearance to this project.

Item No.[8] Environment Clearance for construction of Warehouse other than

agriculture produce located at Village-Pathreri, District-Gurgaon,

Haryana by M/s GLS Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

The case was lastly considered in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on

21.06.2017 and the case was deferred.


consideration in the today’s meeting. The Authority studied and found the following:

[1] What type of the storage arrangement for Fly ash is being proposed as it

cannot be stored under sheets/tarpaulins ?


recommendations of SEAC and the project proponent directed to submit the

satisfactory clarification within 15 days and circulate the copies of same to all

members of SEIAA. On the basis of submission of the satisfactory reply the EC


Item No.[9] Environment Clearance for construction of “5 Star Hotel” at Village

Chakarpur, Golf Course Road, Sector-42, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s

Munjal Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.

The case was lastly considered in the 98th meeting of SEIAA held on

05.12.2016. The Authority decided to defer this case with the decision that Dr S. N.

Mishra and Sh. Hitender Singh, Members SEAC would visit the site for inspection

and submit the report. The committee had submitted the site visit report on

15.06.2017. The site visit report submitted by the committee is as under:

Site Visit Report

The members inspected the site & discussed the proposal with the

representatives of project proponent who showed relevant documents, drawings,&

approvals of the scheme. The observations are as follows:

5

1. License for setting up a commercial colony was granted to Sh. Maman Singh,

D-1/2, Model Town-3, New Delhi vide DGTCP office License No. 25 of 1999

(Annexure-A).

2. The said License was transferred in the name of M/s Krishna Buildwell &

Developers by DGTCP on 12.07.2002 (Annexure-B).

3. Environment Clearance was granted by MoEF on 19.07.2007 to M/s Krishna

Buildwell& Developers for setting up a 5 star hotel (Annexure-C).

4. Munjal Hospitality private Limited (MHPL) purchased the land (3.974 acres)

on which the hotel project is situated along with all assets including building,

furniture etc. in March 2012 (Annexure-D).

5. The built up super structure on the entire plot of land was under demolition.

Photograph attached (Annexure-E).

6. JCB machines were seen on the roof of the building breaking the structure..

7. MHPL has applied to competent authority in June 2016 for increased FAR

under TOD policy (Annexure-F).

Conclusion

From the above it is evident that the EC for the project was obtained from

MOEF in 2007, now stands expired. To make use of the TOD policy of the Govt. to

get the benefits of additional FAR, project proponents are razing the entire existing

structure.

In the today’s meeting it was noticed that as per the site visit report

“Demolition” is being taken place of structure for which the environment clearance

was granted by MoEF on 19.07.2007 in the name of M/s Krishna Buildwell and

Developers for setting up a 5 Star Hotel. As the “Environmental clearance” is

expired meaning, thereby, no further construction or demolition can take place

without having the valid “Environmental Clearance” provided built-up area is less

than 20,000sq. mt.

Authority drew its decision from the EIA notification, 2006 which states that

“Projects undertaking expansion, modernization and change in product mix without

prior Environmental Clearance be treated as cases of violation”. Thus, Authority

decided whether its construction or demolitions both have the environmental

concerns and valid “Environment Clearance” should be taken before the

commencement of work. This pertains to a clear violation of EIA notification, 2006.

After detailed deliberation the authority decided to issue a notice to the

project proponent in this regard.

Item No.[10]Extension of Environmental Clearance of proposed Group HousingProject, Express Greens II, Sector MIA, Sector MIA (19.643 acres),Manesar, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DLF Homes Developers Limited.

6

The case was considered in the 100th meeting of SEIAA and the Authority

decided to defer this case with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. S. N.

Mishra, Members SEAC would visit the site for inspection and submit the report on

the above within 15 days period.

The sub-committee inspected the site on 06.05.2017 in the presence of the

representatives of the project proponent showed relevant documents, drawings &

approvals of the scheme.

Conclusion of the Committee:-

It is clear that the project proponent had valid EC up to 27.10.2016. However

Hon’ble Supreme Court has stayed the construction at site since 24.04.2015. There

was no sign of any construction activity at site.

Almost 80% of the project stands completed. Balance work would require at

least 2 years for final completion.

Keeping In view the above, the Authority decided to grant extension for

validity of EC for 2 years subject to compliance of the conditions already imposed in

the environmental clearance letter.

Item No.[11] Environmental Clearance for the construction of proposed GroupHousing project at Sector-70A, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s PalInfrastructure & Developers Pvt. Ltd.

1. Whereas application for Environmental Clearance was received by the

SEIAA, Haryana on 13.04.2011 and the same was transferred to the SEAC,

Haryana for the appraisal.

2. Show cause notice was issued to the PP vide letter No. 829 dated 27.11.2012.

PP submitted the reply on 01.03.2013.

3. Whereas case was taken up in the 80th, 81st and 87th meetings of SEAC held

on 30.04.2013, 10.05.2013, and 23.07.2013 respectively and case was sent to

SEIAA for initiating legal action against the project proponent.

4. Whereas after taking the legal action against the PP, the case was taken up in

the 111th meeting held on 08.09.2014. Observations of 111th meeting were

conveyed to the PP vide letter No. 1629 dated 11.09.2014. PP submitted the reply

on 24.09.2014.

5. Whereas case was taken up in the 114th meeting held on 27.10.2014.

Observations of 114th meeting were conveyed to the PP vide letter No. 1806

dated 07.11.2014.

6. No reply was received from the project proponent inspite of lapse of TWO

YEARS.

7. Whereas final show cause notice was issued to the project proponent vide

letter No. 1554 dated 20.10.2016.

7

8. Whereas PP has not submitted the reply so far in spite of issuing of Final

Show Cause Notice.

9. As per MoEF guidelines No. J-11 013/5/2009-IA-lI (Part) dated 30.10.2012, all

projects where additional information desired has not been submitted even

after 6 months of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting should be

de-listed from the list of pending projects.


elaborate discussions on the subject and needs more time. Therefore, the case has

been deferred.

Item No.[12] Environmental Clearance for construction of Residential PlottedColony at Sector-29, 30, 32 & 33, Tehsil-Sohna, District-Gurgaon,Haryana by M/s St. Patricks Realty Pvt. Ltd.



2. The SEAC in its 153rd meeting held on 07.06.2017 recommended this project

for environment clearance in the following terms.

Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area 426566.3084 sqm (105.4083)2. Built up area 243038 sqm3. License Valid up 19.06.20194. Nos. of Towers 2 basements + S + 14 Floors, the project

comprise of 430 no. main plots, 158 no. ofEWS plots, 197 no. of NPNL plots, 3 no.Nursery School, 2 no. of Primary School,2 no. of Nursing Home & CommunityCentre.

5. Height 15 Meter 6. Green belt 31.38%7. Water requirement 2279 KLD8. Fresh Water 974 KLD9. Waste Water 1371 KLD10. STP Capacity 1700 KLD11 Power Requirement 6149.02 KW DHBVN12. Solid Waste 6536 kg/day 13. ECS 516 ECS 14. RWH 63 pits


today’s meeting. Detailed discussions were held regarding water requirement,

quality of water, green belt development plan, Ambient Air Quality, NOC regarding

non-involvement of Forest land, recycle and reuse of water, parking plan, traffic


DG sets :

Total Capacity of the DG sets is 4415 KVA are 10 in no. PP may submit

the total quantity of diesel required for daily operations, its storage, safety

8

measures to be taken & an undertaking regarding the statutory

compliances, if required

Form 1A :

Pt. 5.1/5.2/5.3 has not been explained properly and complete data under 5.1 to

be provided

Water Balance Chart

Water is a scarce resource; measures should be taken to conserve it

1.1KLD for Tyre washing, provide “Water Trough” at entry & exit.

Miscellaneous water consumption, sprinkling of water would it be on daily

basis?

Incorporate the guidelines of MoEF&CC for “Water Use Reduction” as

shown in table 2.4 .

Resubmit the separate “Water Balance Charts” for each season.

Submit the affidavit stating not to discharge untreated water in public sewer

& till the time sewer is not provided PP will make all the arrangements to

manage/dispose the discharge at their own as per the guidelines of State

Pollution Control Board/ MoEF&CC.

Traffic Density at Sohna road :

The Project Proponent states that the carrying capacity of Sohna road is enough &

“Level of service” shown is very good (0.265), practically it doesn’t seem so.

OWC:

The Project Proponent shall submit the Location of “OWC” on the lay-out plan.

Plantation:

Canopy area 25 mt2 means distance between 2 trees cannot be less than 5.6 mts.

Make the plantation plan accordingly.

Base Level data for PM2.5 shown from March to May 2016, max.is

57.2/52.7/69.2/63.1/77.0/83.8 µg/mt3(pg no. 102)


recommendations of SEAC and EC would be accorded to project proponent

provided they submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations

within 15 days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies

of information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter

shall be issued.

Item No.[13] Environmental Clearance for construction of Commercial Colony atSector-114, Gurgaon Manesar Urban Complex, Gurgaon, Haryanaby M/s KST Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

The case was taken up in 153rd meeting of SEAC and unanimous view that

this is a case of violation as already observed by SEAC in earlier meetings and

9

SEAC is of the unanimous view that this case may be referred to SEIAA for taking

appropriate action in the matter in terms of notification dated 14.03.2017.

In the today’s meeting the brief history of the case has been gone through as

per following:

The case came up for appraisal for SEAC and the committee decided for the

site visit before the appraisal and the visiting team found irregularities i.e.

temporary shed, some another construction being used by their office and some

excavation.

On the basis of the site visit SEAC recommended for prosecution.

The case was considered in 88th meeting of SEIAA on 29.02.2016 and decided

that a Sub-Committee comprising of Shri Hitender Singh and Dr. S.N. Mishra,

Members SEAC would inspect the project area site in order to access the status of

construction if any and submit the report to the SEIAA. The report submitted by

the sub-committee was considered in 94th meeting of SEIAA held on 11.08.2016 and

according they found the following points:

(i) A Temporary tin shed in one corner of the site away from the main

building.

(ii) A small construction (209 sqmt.), approved by STP Gurgaon which is to be

demolished at the time of project.

(iii) Excavation found and reported which project proponent claims that were

not done by them rather farmers dug and took away the earth.

On the basis of above written report SEIAA directed to SEAC for appraisal

but SEAC again recommended prosecution. This case was constantly sent back and

forth approximately 3-4 times and finally the case was appraised with the

recommendation for prosecution leaving the decision at SEIAA.

In the case of Glomore Construction and Ors. Vs. The Union of India &Ors

the Hon’ble Bombay High Court has said that in case the construction purposed to

be carried out in less than 20,000 sqmt area without obtaining the environmental

clearance, it does not tantamount to violation of environmental clearance.

As per statement given by project proponent to the sub-committee “that

excavation was done by farmer”. In any case the excavation was far less than 20,

000 sqmt. When a built-up area less than 20, 000 sqmt, it can be built up without

prior environment clearance. How this small excavation can be treated as violation?

It is therefore considered opinion of the Authority that the activities taken up by the

project proponent cannot be treated as violation by any stretch of imagination.

In view of the above discussion it was decided by the authority to grant

Environment Clearance to the project.

10

Item No.[14] Revised EC for Expansion: Construction/Development of proposedIndependent Floors/Plots in Residential Plotted Colony “Privana”DLF Garden City, Sector 76 & 77, Village Kherki Daula & Shikohpur,Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s DLF Utilities Ltd.


SEIAA, Haryana on 08.12.2014 and the same was transferred to the SEAC,


2. Whereas case was taken up for the approval of Terms of Reference in the

118th meeting of SEAC held on 19.02.2015 and ToRs were conveyed to you vide

letter No. 2049 dated 10.03.2015. The PP submitted the EIA report on 31.08.2015.

3. Whereas case was taken up for the appraisal in the 127th meeting of SEAC

held on 15.02.2016 and the observations of 127th were conveyed to you vide letter

No. 646 dated 24.02.2016.

4. No reply was received from the project proponent inspite of lapse of EIGHT

MONTHS.


letter No. 1551 dated 20.10.2016.

6. Whereas PP has not submitted the reply so far inspite of issuing of Final Show

Cause Notice.


projects where additional information desired has not been submitted even

after 6 months of the Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC) meeting should be


The recommendation of SEAC was considered in today’s meeting in the light

of guidelines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-

2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated 18.12.2014

submitted application for Revised EC for Expansion: Construction/Development of

proposed Independent Floors/Plots in Residential Plotted Colony “Privana” DLF

Garden City, Sector 76 & 77, Village Kherki Daula & Shikohpur, Gurgaon,

Haryana.The Authority decided that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra,




the decision that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated

above within 15 days period.

Item No.[15] Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up GroupHousing (15.280 Acres) at Sector-35, Village Mohammadpur Gurjar,Tehsil Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Faith Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.

11



information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In

the absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for

the environmental clearance.




submitted application for Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up

Group Housing (15.280 Acres) at Sector-35, Village Mohammadpur Gurjar, Tehsil

Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana.

“The project proponent has submitted a request on 27.06.2017. The PP request

in his application that recently with the implementation of Haryana Building

code 2017 and new govt. policies implemented by Haryana such as New

Integrated Licensing Policy (NILP) & Transit Oriented Development (TOD), the

planning of the project revised as per the new Building code/norms. The PP

requested to grant the extension of time for environment clearance appraisal for

the above said project”.

After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to refer back this case to the

SEAC with the advice that the case should be appraised as per request made by

project proponent.

Item No.[16] Environmental Clearance for construction of Lalit Suri Education &Charitable Trust, Food craft complex, Badkhal road, Faridabad,Haryana by M/s The Lalit Suri Education & Charitable Trust.


SEIAA, Haryana on05.08.2014 and the same was transferred to the SEAC,


2. Whereas case was taken up in the 112th meeting of SEAC held on 19.09.2014

and observationswere conveyed to you vide letter No. 1696 dated 26.09.2014.

3. No reply was received from the project proponent inspite of lapse of TWO

YEARS.


letter No. 1552 dated20.10.2016.

5. Whereas PP has not submitted the reply so far inspite of issuing of Final Show

Cause Notice.


projects whereadditional information desired has not been submitted even

12

after 6 months of the ExpertAppraisal Committee (EAC) meeting should be




2012. It was noticed that the project proponent vide letter dated

05.08.2014submitted application for construction of Lalit Suri Education &

Charitable Trust, Food craft complex, Badkhal road, Faridabad, Haryana.The

Authority decided that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC

shall visit the site for inspection of project on the following point:



the decision that Sh. A.K. Bhatia and Shri Raj Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall

visit the site for inspection and shall submit the report on the point as indicated

above within 15 days period.

Item No.[17] Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up GroupHousing (20.056 Acres) at Sector-35, Village MohammadpurGurjar,Tehsil Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Faith Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.



information sought by SEAC despite issuance of various letters and final notice. In

the absence of the vital information it was not possible to appraise the project for

the environmental clearance.


of guide lines of MoEF issued vide OM No. J-11 013/5/2009-IAII (Part) dated 30-10-


submitted application for Environmental Clearance for construction of setting up

Group Housing (20.056 Acres) at Sector-35, Village Mohammadpur Gurjar, Tehsil

Sohna, Gurgaon, Haryana.

“The project proponent has submitted a request on 27.06.2017. The PP request

in his application that recently with the implementation of Haryana Building

code 2017 and new govt. policies implemented by Haryana such as New

Integrated Licensing Policy (NILP) & Transit Oriented Development (TOD), the

planning of the project revised as per the new Building code/norms. The PP

requested to grant the extension of time for environment clearance appraisal for

the above said project”.

After detailed deliberation the Authority decided to refer back this case to the

SEAC with the advice that the case should be appraised as per request made by

project proponent.

13

Item No.[18] Environmental Clearance for Proposed Construction of ResidentialPlotted Colony with Group Housing Colony at Village-Fatehpur,Admapur, Tikri&Jharsa at Sector-47 & 50, Gurgaon, Haryana byM/s Malibu Estate Pvt. Ltd.

The SEAC was considered this case in its 153rd meeting held on 29.06.2017.

During discussion, it was revealed that project proponent has already started the

construction without obtaining prior environmental clearance which amounts to

violation of EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006. The fact apparently was brought

before the Committee on reference to the project proposal.

The Committee again went through the latest Notification dated 14.03.2017

relating to Consideration of proposals for ToRs/Environment Clearance involving

violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986/Environment Impact



Assessment Notification, 2006 from the concerned Regulatory Authority are brought

for Environmental Clearance after starting the construction work, or have

undertaking expansion, modernization and change in product mix without prior

Environmental Clearance , these projects shall be treated as cases of violation and in

such cases, even Category B projects which are granted environmental clearance by

the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority constituted under sub-

section(3) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 shall be apprised

for grant of environmental clearance only by the Expert Appraisal Committee and

the Environmental Clearance will be granted at the Central level.

In the today’s meeting the Authority decided that this case may be sent to

MoEF & CC, GoI as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017.

ItemNo.[19] Environmental Clearance for construction of “IndustrialWarehousing/Storage/Logistics Project” at Faizabad, District-Jhajjar,Haryana by M/s Indospace Industrial Park Badli Pvt. Ltd.



2. The SEAC in its 154th meeting held on 29.06.2017 recommended this project


Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area 449175.1554 sqm2. Built up area 129779 sqm3. CLU Issue 28.12.20164. No. of Buildings 8 (units 15 Nos.)5. Amenities Project shall be used for storage of

Electronics, Electrical and consumerdurables, FMCG retail products,automobiles accessories/spare parts andagricultural

14

6. Height 17.8 Meter 7. Green belt 20%8. Water requirement 163 KLD9. Fresh Water 53 KLD10. Waste Water 113 KLD11 STP Capacity 150 KLD12. Power Requirement 3500 KVA UHBVN13. Solid Waste 415 kg/day 14. ECS 419 trucks (for loading/unloading of

material) and 838 other vehicles.15. RWH 59 pits






Pt.2.1(pg no.29):

Water requirement to be met with Borewell Supply. Receipt of no permission from

CGWB is attached; quantity of water to be extracted & size of bore wells not

mentioned

Pt. 2.9:

Says there will be no Ground water Extraction in contradiction to pt. 2.1. Explain is

required on this point.

Pt. 1.23(pg no. 10):

Treated water from HUDA STP is available; therefore, same can be used in

Horticulture (pg no.59) also, thereby, saving the precious water. Resubmit the

“Water Balance Charts” for all three seasons separately

Pg. no. 103;

PM10& PM2.5at Faizabad reported to be 147.1 & 80.3 µg/m3; very much on the

higher side and project being the Industrial park leading to additional movement of

vehicles therefore, PP is asked to take adequate measures to prevent the air

pollution from increased Traffic movement



submits the satisfactory clarification to the above raised observations within 15

days. It was also decided that the project proponent shall supply the copies of

information to all the members of SEIAA and after their approval the EC letter

shall be issued.

Item No.[20] Environmental Clearance for Expansion of Affordable Group Housing colony at village Dharampur Sector-107, District Gurgaon, Haryana byM/s Signatures Builders Pvt. Ltd.

15





Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area Existing 24786.957 sqm (6.125 Acres)

Expansion 12140.544 sqm (3 Acres)Total 36927.50 sqm (9.125 acres)

2. Built up area Existing 64015.082 sqmExpansion 38788.618 sqmTotal 102803.7 sqm

3. License Valid up 17.06.20194. No. of Towers 12 Towers + GF + 14 Floors, 2 Storage

Tanks, community Hall, Creach andAnganwadi, Convenient shopping/commercial

5. No. of Dwelling unit 1454 DU6. Height 44.8 Meter 7. Green belt 20.49%8. Water requirement 1096 KLD9. Fresh Water 680 KLD10. Waste Water 909 KLD11 STP Capacity 1091 KLD12. Power Requirement 4696.4 KW DHBVN13. Solid Waste 4090 kg/day 14. Parking 728 ECS15. RWH 2 pits






Water balance Chart

Incorporate the recommendations of MoEF&CC for “Water Use Reduction”

DG sets of capacity (2x250+1x380)KVA, such capacity can be air-cooled.

Conserve Water & Energy

Location & Carrying capacity of External sewer.




Pollution Control Board/ MoEF&CC.

Pt. 8.3;

16

“Fly ash will be used for Road Construction”;What measures would be undertaken

to control the air pollution arising by on-site transportation/storage & use of Fly-

ash?

Base Level Concentration of PM10&PM2.5(max.) observed in document 197.2 & 87.6

µg/m3respectively, is already on the higher side , therefore, PP is asked to take

adequate measures to prevent the air pollution due to the increased traffic

circulation .






shall be issued.

Item No.[21]Environmental Clearance for proposed Affordable Group Housing

Colony at Village-Gadoli Khurd and Gadoli Kalan, Sector-37 D,

District Gurgaon Haryana by M/s Signature Global (India) Pvt. Ltd.





Sr. no. Particulars Remarks1. Plot area 39260.768 sqm (9.70 Acres)2. Built up area 90247.64 sqm3. License Valid up 01.02.2022

No. of towers/blocks 11 no. + Commercial, Gf+ 26 Floors 4. Amenities 1448 Dwelling units, 1 commercial

building, 1 Community Hall,1Aanganwadi

5. Height 81 Meter 6. Green belt 27.8%7. Water requirement 1059 KLD8. Fresh Water 662 KLD9. Waste Water 867 KLD10. STP Capacity 1060 KLD11 Power Requirement 5020 KW DHBVN12. Solid Waste 3449 kg/day 13. Parking 770 ECS and 1540 Scooter14. RWH 10 pits






17

Water Balance chart:

DG cooling 1KLD; capacity of DG sets is 380 & 400 KVA, air-cooled DG sets

may be installed to conserve water & energy

Filter Back-wash: 15 KLD where this filter is deployed? No need of cooling

tower & submitted plan does not have any provisions for HVAC




Pollution Control Board/ MoEF & CC

Form 1A:

pt. 5.1/5.2/5.3 not elaborated properly and complete data be provided under

pt.5.1

Pt. 9.1; “Assumed Power Consumption” per sq. ft. of the built-up area.

On site “Base Level concentration” of PM10/PM2.5 shown to be 176.2/100.2

µg/m3, much higher than the NAAQS, therefore, PP is asked to take adequate

measures to prevent the air pollution due to the increased traffic circulation






shall be issued.

Item No.[22] Environmental Clearance for proposed expansion of isolated storage

terminal with additional storage tanks (1 x 8620 KL for MS; 3 x 20000

KLD for HSD and 2 x 70 KL of Bo-diesel) at Rewari Terminal,

Haryana by M/s Indian Oil Corporation Limited.


stipulation stated therein. The Project Proponent has proposed for expansion of

isolated storage terminal with additional storage tanks (1 x 8620 KL for MS; 3 x

20000 KLD for HSD and 2 x 70 KL of Bo-diesel) at Rewari Terminal, Haryana.

In the today’s meeting the SEIAA approved the “Terms of Reference” and it

was decided that the project proponent will prepare the EIA report by using Model

Terms of Reference of MoEF & CC along-with the following additional terms of

reference:

1. The PP should comply the guidelines of Ministry of Petroleum regarding

distance from the Highway, District Headquarters and other Habitations, in

case distance is not as per the guidelines of Ministry of Petroleum then this

TOR will become invalid.

18

2. The PP to adopt rain water harvesting plan only for the rooftop and shed,

water will be properly channelized to the recharge structure.

3. The PP will give existing green belt plan and new green belt plan with

Calculations.

4. The PP should submit the schemes for oil water separator.

5. The PP should submit the schemes for ETP.

6. The PP should submit the schemes for STP.

7. The PP should comply the norms of BS-IV for their loading trucks.

8. The PP should submit the fire permission from Petroleum and Explosives

Safety Organisation, Nagpur.

9. The PP should submit the schemes for zero discharge.

10. The PP should submit the details of source of water and availability.

11. The PP should submit the inspection report of MoEF.

12. The PP should submit undertaking for construction norms.

ADDITIONAL AGENDA




The case was considered in the 101st meeting of SEIAA held on 22.03.2017 and

the case was deferred with the decision that Mr. Hitender Singh and Shri Raj

Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC would visit the site for inspection and shall submit

the report on the point as indicated above within 30 days period.

The Project Proponent vide letter dated 06.04.2017 submitted the reply and

the committee submitted the report on 21.07.2017 which was discussed in the

today’s meeting.

On the basis of the satisfactory reply to the queries and site visit report and

with the recommendation of SEAC it is decided to accord Environment Clearance

to this project.

Item No.[24] Environmental Clearance for proposed Group Housing Project- EDGE

Towers (Phase-II) At Ghadauli Kalan, Sector-37-D, Gurgaon,


The case was considered in the 102ndmeeting of SEIAA held on 20.04.2017 and

the case was deferred with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh and Sh. Shri Raj

Kumar Sapra, Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and shall submit the

report on the point as indicated above within 15 days period.

19

The committee submitted the report on 21.07.2017 and submitted the

following:

1. The said project is being developed into phase (I&II). Both these projects are

adjacent & contagious each other.

2. The project proponent had obtained Environmental Clearance for only Phase

I of the project.

3. Phase II consisting of Residential Towers & allied facilities has been

constructed without obtaining prior Environmental Clearance.

The representative of the project proponent were asked by the committee

members to submit a layout plan indicating the exact scope & size of construction

executed without obtaining prior EC. They were also asked to submit an affidavit in

this regard to the SEIAA office within 4 days. However these documents have not

been submitted by the project proponent.

Conclusion

From the above it is evident that the project has been constructed without

obtaining prior Environmental Clearance. It is recommended that action as per the

law may be taken.

In the today’s meeting it was noticed that as per the report submitted by the

committee the project proponent has already started the construction in Phase-II

without obtaining prior environmental clearance which amounts to violation of EIA

Notification dated 14.09.2006. The fact was brought before the Committee who visited

the site.

The Authority gone through the latest Notification dated 14.03.2017

regarding the Consideration of proposals for ToRs/Environment Clearance

involving violation of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986/Environment Impact



Assessment Notification, 2006 from the concerned Regulatory Authority are brought

for Environmental Clearance after starting the construction work, or have

undertaking expansion, modernization and change in product mix without prior

Environmental Clearance , these projects shall be treated as cases of violation and in

such cases, even Category B projects which are granted environmental clearance by

the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority constituted under sub-

section(3) of section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 shall be apprised

for grant of environmental clearance only by the Expert Appraisal Committee and

the Environmental Clearance will be granted at the Central level.

20

In view of the above, Authority decided that this case may be sent to MoEF &

CC, GoI as per latest notification dated 14.03.2017.

Item No.[25] Environmental Clearance for Group Housing colony located at villageNangliUmarpur, Sector -62, Gurgaon , Haryana by M/s Emaar MGFLand Limited.

The case was considered in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on 21.06.2017

and the case was deferred with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N.

Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and

shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

The Project Proponent and the committee submitted the reply/report on

21.07.2017 which was discussed in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that in the

last meeting of SEIAA the project proponent was asked to give the exact capacity of

DG sets to be installed and the water required for the cooling of DG sets along with

the incorporation of MoEF Guidelines for the water use reduction as table 2.4.

Further project proponent was asked to explain certain points in Form IA. The

project proponent in their reply has stated that the proposed capacity of DG sets

would be (2x1500 + 1x500) KVA for phase-I and (2x 1010 + 1x 380) KVA for Phase –

II and all the DG sets would be air cooled thus requiring no water for cooling

purposes even given an affidavit in this regard. The project proponent has

incorporated the MoEF Guidelines for water use reduction leading to total water

requirement i.e. (106.44 + 47.5) KLD / (104.44 + 47.5) KLD /(104.04 +47.5) KLD for

summer / monsoon / winter season respectively and submitted an affidavit for the

discharge of excess treated water only to the external sewer provided by the

authorities and will make its own arrangement till the time sewer is not provided by

concerned authorities.

On the basis of the satisfactory reply to the queries; site visit report and the

recommendation/appraisal of SEAC it is decided to accord Environment Clearance

to this project.

Item No.[26] Environmental Clearance for Modification /Expansion of environment

clearance for Group Housing Colony project at Village Gwal Pahari,

Sector-2, District-Gurgaon, Haryana by M/s Jasmine Buildmart Pvt.

Ltd.

The case was considered in the 104th meeting of SEIAA held on 21.06.2017

and the case was deferred with the decision that Sh. Hitender Singh, Sh. S. N.

Mishra, and Sh. R. K. Sapra Members SEAC shall visit the site for inspection and

shall submit the report on the points as indicated above within 15 days period.

21

The Project Proponent and the committee submitted the reply/report

on21.07.2017 which was discussed in the today’s meeting and it was noticed that in

the last meeting of SEIAA the project proponent was asked to incorporate the

recommendations of MoEF& CC for water use reduction as in table 2.4 and project

proponent was asked to submit the details of background air quality levels with

predicted values based on dispersion models and to elaborate certain points in Form

IA. The project proponent has submitted the reply after incorporating the

recommendations of MoEF on water use reduction leading to fresh water

requirement to 76 KLD. The project proponent has submitted the under taking

regarding discharge of excess treated water only to external sewer to be provided by

the concerned authorities. The project proponent was asked to verify the results

submitted for the particulate matters; project proponent has submitted the report of

the fresh sample taken on 19th July 2017; the values of PM 2.5 shown to be 57.36 and

59.37 µg/m3 and 114.58&121.50 µg/m3 for PM 10 respectively. The project proponent

is suggested to take adequate measure to suppress the particulate matter arising due

to the increase in the volume of traffic circulation.

Lic. No. 105 of 2008 dtd. 15/05/2008 granted to project proponent for setting up a

“Group Housing Colony” falling in the revenue estate of vill.-Gawal Pahari, sector-

3, Gurgaon has been renewed till 14/05/2018 by the Directorate of Town & Country

Planning, Haryana.

On the basis of the satisfactory reply to the queries, site visit report and with

the recommendation/appraisal of SEAC it is decided to accord Environment

Clearance to this project by imposing the usual condition in practice.

*****