Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Post on 29-Mar-2023

2 views 0 download

Transcript of Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Comparison of Palintest Soil Analysis to External Laboratory Analysis S. Eddy and S. R. Johnston, Palintest Ltd.

This study has been carried out to provide a correlation between the test methods used in the Palintest Soil Testing Kits and recognised laboratory methods for soil analysis. Where practicable the laboratory method used the same procedure as the extraction methods recommended in the UK by MAFF/ADAS ‘The Analysis of Agricultural Materials’ Reference book 427. All samples were air dried and passed through a 2mm sieve prior to analysis. Samples batches were then split prior to testing between methods. Summary of Extraction Procedures

Test Test

Species

Palintest

Extractant

Laboratory

Extractant

MAFF/ADAS

Extractions

Nitrate N 1M Ammonium

Chloride

2M Potassium

Chloride

2M Potassium

Chloride

Phosphate P 0.5M Sodium Bicarbonate

Olsen’s Extract 0.5M Sodium Bicarbonate

Potassium K 0.1M Magnesium

Acetate Ammonium Nitrate

1M Ammonium

Nitrate

Calcium Ca 1M Potassium

Chloride Ammonium Nitrate

1M Ammonium

Nitrate

Magnesium Mg 1M Potassium

Chloride Ammonium Nitrate

1M Ammonium Nitrate

Aluminium Al 1M Potassium

Chloride EDTA Extract

No method for

Aluminium in soil

Ammonia N 1M Potassium

Chloride

2M Potassium

Chloride

2M Potassium

Chloride

Chloride Cl Water Water Saturated Calcium Sulphate Solution

Copper Cu 0.05M Disodium

EDTA Ammonium EDTA

0.05M Ammonium

EDTA

Iron Fe 1M Potassium

Chloride DTPA Extract

No method for

Iron in soil.

Manganese Mn 1M Ammonium

Chloride DTPA Extract

1M Ammonium Acetate

pH pH Lime Requirement CaCO3

No extraction required

Conductivity µS/cm Water Saturated Calcium Sulphate Solution

Saturated Calcium Sulphate Solution

Sulphate S Water Phosphate Buffer

Soluble Sulphate Water

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Results of the correlation study Aluminium

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 2.6 66.2

SWB 1.4 58.6

MSW 1.2 49.7

TKL 1.0 44.5

LRG 1.4 6.8

SLE 2.0 55.5

TAB 1.3 59.6

The Palintest aluminium results do not show any linear correlation to the external laboratory analysis this is due to the extract used to remove the aluminium from the soil. Palintest uses potassium chloride to remove the available aluminium from the soil and the tablet reagents then measure the amount of free aluminium. The external laboratory extraction method uses EDTA, which removes the extractable aluminium from the soil, and this is then determined as complexed aluminium.

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Ammonia Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 6.3 1.6

SWB 45.5 47.9

MSW 10.8 12.4

TKL 16.0 16.1

LRG 28.1 25.1

SLE 19.5 19.6

TAB 3.7 0.4

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Calcium

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 2833 2500

SWB 2708 2279

MSW 2792 2339

TKL 1792 1621

LRG 2708 2355

SLE 2208 1751

TAB 2667 1956

The Calcium Tablet Count test has a detection limit of ± 250 mg/l.

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Chloride

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 67 78

SWB 63 66

MSW 59 48

TKL 59 30

LRG 42 72

SLE 46 36

TAB 59 48

The Palintest Chloride test does not show a high level of linear correlation to the external analysis. The reason it does not show a higher level of linear correlation is that the Chloride Tablet Count test has a detection limit of ± 25 mg/l. For the soil samples studied in this report the amount of chloride present and the variation between samples was insufficient to demonstrate a higher degree of correlation between the test methods. Conductivity

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 100 1965

SWB 100 1972

MSW 100 1852

TKL 100 2009

LRG 100 1959

SLE 100 1920

TAB 100 1999

The Palintest Conductivity test does not show a high level of linear correlation to the external analysis due to the extraction procedure used to remove the soluble salts from the soil. Palintest uses deionised water to remove them and the external method uses a saturated calcium sulphate solution to displace them from the soil.

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Copper

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 5.1 12.5

SWB 54.3 71.7

MSW 7.0 14.1

TKL 7.9 10.1

LRG 8.8 11.6

SLE 15.1 22.5

TAB 5.9 8.7

51023 3.8 2.7

51200 4.1 5.7

52076 8.7 10.2

52078 15.5 18.9

52359 14.0 14.5

53491 23.7 23.1

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Iron

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 41.4 40.4

SWB 44.3 27.4

MSW 51.4 82.2

TKL 50.4 41.9

LRG 19.3 42.4

SLE 37.2 26.6

TAB 51.3 77.6

51025 50.0 92.2

51201 101.6 214.4

51203 112.6 315.3

51930 108.2 404.2

53318 90.5 699.4

The Palintest Iron test does not show any linear correlation to the external analysis due to the extract used to remove the iron from the soil. Palintest uses EDTA to remove the available iron from the soil whereas the external method uses DTPA.

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Magnesium

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 151 152

SWB 220 233

MSW 123 112

TKL 240 258

LRG 109 107

SLE 228 221

TAB 302 288

248957 29 20

249344 63 48

249707 101 75

249969 175 150

249254 231 203

249128 232 255

249147 271 301

249496 401 404

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Manganese

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 0.8 2.5

SWB 20.9 19.8

MSW 7.6 3.3

TKL 8.1 4.7

LRG 4.9 2.4

SLE 11.5 5.6

TAB 5.0 4.7

51023 29.9 37.9

51025 17.1 19.3

51202 3.2 6.9

51496 22.4 24.4

51536 54.5 58.7

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Nitrate

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 55.3 58.9

SWB 16.4 26.4

MSW 40.6 36.4

TKL 14.9 14.2

LRG 10.2 7.7

SLE 13.1 11.9

TAB 31.6 35.9

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

pH Block

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 6.3 6.90

SWB 6.8 6.30

MSW 7.6 7.30

TKL 7.8 7.70

LRG 7.8 8.00

SLE 6.8 7.70

TAB 7.6 6.80

249713 4.1 4.06

249890 4.7 4.50

249729 5.6 5.08

248862 5.8 5.51

248778 5.6 6.00

248917 6.8 6.50

248909 7.4 7.00

249044 7.3 7.50

248814 8.0 8.01

The pH block test has a detection limit of ± 0.5 pH units.

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

pH Meter

Sample

Reference Palintest - pH Probe External Laboratory

249713 4.79 4.06

249890 5.30 4.50

249729 5.69 5.08

248862 5.76 5.51

248778 5.74 6.00

248917 6.64 6.50

248909 7.18 7.00

249044 7.71 7.50

248814 7.96 8.01

SRJ 6.92 6.90

SWB 6.36 6.30

MSW 7.31 7.30

TKL 7.60 7.70

LRG 8.05 8.00

SLE 7.87 7.70

TAB 6.91 6.80

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Phosphate

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 26 41

SWB 29 30

MSW 33 41

TKL 45 48

LRG 77 90

SLE 46 44

TAB 38 40

249017 1 5

249420 13 15

249947 20 20

249540 27 25

249790 28 35

249538 46 40

249652 35 45

248924 41 50

249557 84 80

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Potassium

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 111 92

SWB 218 157

MSW 148 152

TKL 347 377

LRG 141 156

SLE 92 56

TAB 309 330

248730 49 25

248747 77 53

248786 112 102

249190 151 151

249013 212 201

249557 204 245

249547 265 351

249576 309 400

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Sulphate

Sample Reference Palintest External Laboratory

SRJ 30.2 20.9

SWB 32.4 32.5

MSW 42.4 17.1

TKL 49.6 22.5

LRG 26.7 29.4

SLE 26.3 33.4

TAB 57.1 30.3

51023 40.0 21.2

51202 180.8 195.5

51318 96.3 56.1

51346 141.0 95.9

The extraction procedure used to remove the water soluble sulphate from the soil is different for the two methods. Palintest uses deionised water and the external method uses a phosphate buffer.

Comparison of Soil Test Methods 2009

Conclusions Overall the comparison of the results between Palintest test methods and external laboratory analysis shows a high degree of correlation, with the exception of:

• Aluminium • Chloride • Conductivity • Iron

In the cases of aluminium, conductivity and iron the variance is explained by the difference in extraction method used for these tests. In the case of chloride, no correlation can be concluded due to the small variance in concentration and degree of sensitivity of the test method at this low concentration. For aluminium and iron there are currently no recognised methods specified by MAFF/ADAS for the analysis of soils.

Test Test

Species Palintest Method

Laboratory Extractant

Correlation

Nitrate N 1M Ammonium

Chloride

2M Potassium

Chloride �

Phosphate P 0.5M Sodium

Bicarbonate Olsen’s Extract �

Potassium K 0.1M Magnesium

Acetate Ammonium Nitrate �

Calcium Ca 1M Potassium

Chloride Ammonium Nitrate �

Magnesium Mg 1M Potassium

Chloride Ammonium Nitrate �

Aluminium Al 1M Potassium

Chloride EDTA Extract

Ammonia N 1M Potassium

Chloride

2M Potassium

Chloride �

Chloride Cl Water Water

Copper Cu 0.05M Disodium

EDTA Ammonium EDTA �

Iron Fe 1M Potassium

Chloride DTPA Extract

Manganese Mn 1M Ammonium

Chloride DTPA Extract �

pH pH Lime Requirement CaCO3

No extraction required

No extraction required �

Conductivity µS/cm Water Saturated Calcium

Sulphate Solution

Sulphate S Water Phosphate Buffer Soluble Sulphate �