VirtualECare: Group Decision Supported by Idea Generation and Argumentation
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of VirtualECare: Group Decision Supported by Idea Generation and Argumentation
VirtualECare: Group Decision Supported by Idea Generation and
ArgumentationRicardo Costa1, Paulo Novais2, Goretti Marreiros1, João Neves2, Carlos Ramos1
and José Neves2
1 Polytechnic of Oporto, Portugal
2 DI - CCTC, Universidade do Minho – PortugalPRO-VE 2008
Poland, September 2008
2PRO-VE 2008
OutlineIntroductionThe VirtualECare ProjectGroup Support in Collaborative Networks Organizations
Group Support SystemsMeeting PhasesIdea GenerationArgumentation Module
Conclusion
3PRO-VE 2008
IntroductionHuman population is ageing:
Old age brings new problems.Problems not exclusive of the elderly:
Diseases are increasing between young people.Important to find new and cost effective ways for healthcare;VirtualECare project:
Combine the advances in information society with GDSS;Apply theses advances to the healthcare sector.
4PRO-VE 2008
Ambient Intelligence (AmI)
Relatively new paradigm in IT;
Digital environment:aware of presence;
sensitive;
adaptive;
responsive.
Combine ubiquitous information, communication, and entertainment, with enhanced personalization, natural interaction and intelligence.
5PRO-VE 2008
AmI (2)
“Ambient Intelligence envisions a world where people are surronded by Intelligence and intuitive interfaces embedded in the everyday objects arround them!” [PattieMaes]
“These interfaces recognize and respond to the presenceand behavior of an individual in a personalized andrelevant way.” [Elisabetta Farella]
6PRO-VE 2008
AmI (3)Ubiquitous
Computingintegrate micro-processors in day-to-day objects.
Communicationallow day-to-day object to
communicate with each other.
Intelligent user interfaces
6
7PRO-VE 2008
AmI in healthcare
New paradigm.
Digital environment aware of presence:Able to adapt and response;
Characteristics present an advantage in Healthcare:Make patients feel “better”;
Provide personalized, intelligent, assistive technology, promoting patient recovery.
8PRO-VE 2008
AmI in healthcare (2)
Medical control support devices:Wearable Computing (http://www.biodevices.pt):
Blood pressure;
Temperature;
Etc...
Home:
Aware of patient condition;
Aware of patient movements;
Make emergency calls;
etc..
9PRO-VE 2008
AmI in healthcare (3)
Examples:IST Vivago®
Telecare
EMR at Hospital Geral Santo António - Porto
10PRO-VE 2008
The VirtualECare ProjectIntelligent multi-agent system able to interact and serve its costumers;
Interconnected to:healthcare institutions;
leisure centers;
training facilities;
shops;
relatives;
others.
12PRO-VE 2008
Group DecisionThe increase of group decision processes in organizations contribute to the emerge of Group Decision Support Systems (GDSSs) in the 80’s
GDSS aims reduce the loss associated to group work and to maintain or improve the gains
There several commercial and non-commercial GDSSs
13PRO-VE 2008
Decision Making Structures
Individual
Person
Team Group Organization
NegotiatedUnilateralComputational System
Multi-participant
Decision making
14PRO-VE 2008
Group Support in Collaborative Networks Organizations
Group Support Systems:Collaborative Work:
Presupposes the existence of a group;A group as elements:
Variable number;Variable persistency;Variable location;Variable organizations;Variable timeline.
15PRO-VE 2008
Group Support in Collaborative Networks Organizations (2)
Meeting phases:Pre-meeting:
The facilitator prepares the meeting:Establish the meeting goals;
Proceeds with the group formation;
Selects the best supporting tools.
In-Meeting:Participants try to achieve meeting goal;
Facilitator monitors;
16PRO-VE 2008
Group Support in Collaborative Networks Organizations (3)
Meeting phases:Post-meeting:
Evaluate the results;
Identify and store useful information.
Pre-Meeting In-Meeting Post-Meeting
18PRO-VE 2008
VirtualECare Group Decision - component
Setup module – it will be operated by a facilitator during the pre-meeting phase, in charge of configuration and parameterization activities;Multi-criteria module – it will be operated by a facilitator during the pre-meeting phase, being in charge of the definition of the evaluation criteria and scaling of all the sub-systems; Argumentation module - This module is based on the IBIS (Issue Based Information System) argumentation model, developed by Ritteland his colleagues in the early 70’s, where an argument is a statement or a belief, which may support or pointed out to one or more thoughts.Voting module - This module is responsible for allowing each intervenient of the decision group component to “vote” for his preferred choice, normally the one most similar to his “opinion”.
19PRO-VE 2008
Idea Generation (1)The Group Decision module requires a real effectiveness of the decision making process;
The use of an idea generation tool is crucial;
20PRO-VE 2008
Idea Generation (2)Idea generation techniques:
Brainstorming;
Nominal Group Technique (NGT);
Mind-mapping;
Etc …
21PRO-VE 2008
Idea Generation (3)Brainstorming – it is probably the best-known creative tool. It can be used in most situations, although in most cases the rules that oversee it must be perceived by the group members. It comes with all its potential when and independent facilitator manages the process (so the group can focus on the creative tasks). In general, a brainstorming takes between 30 (thirty) minutes to 1 (one) hour, depending on the difficulty of the problem and the motivation of the decision group. Due to this detail it cannot be used in situations of life or death, but it may and is going to be used in assessing patients quality-of-life;Mind-mapping – it is best used when one needs to explore and/or develop ideas to help in getting a solution to a specific problem, or when we need to take notes and/or summarize meetings. It may be used to obtain instant answers in critical situations.
22PRO-VE 2008
A decision tree of a specific problem
In Mind-mapping the specific problem is presented in the form of a decision tree, being the vital data obtained, for instance, from the sensors attached to the supported user
24PRO-VE 2008
Argumentation Module (2)The questions are the goals of the meeting;
Ideas are the alternatives;
Arguments are the pros or cons vis-à-vis a given idea.
27PRO-VE 2008
Argumentation Module (3)Once a decision has been made, it is (automatically) sent to the monitored person.
28PRO-VE 2008
ConclusionA new reality in the healthcare sector:
a dignified care provisioning to all;without delocalizing;
This paper describes the VirtualECare project:special incidence on the Group Decision module;supports for meetings allowing the sharing of ideas and allowingeach one to “defend” those ideas in order to reach consensus or majority;
Future work:the argumentation module will allow not only a simple way of justifying opinions, but also a persuasive argumentation in order to allow each element to try influence other through the confrontation of opinion.