The Role of genetic engineering in fermentation technology
Transcript of The Role of genetic engineering in fermentation technology
A TERM PAPER
ON
THE ROLE OF GENETIC ENGINEERING IN FERMENTATION
TECHNOLOGY
BY
NWIYI, IKECHUKWU U.
M.TECH/SNAS/2013/4207
DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY
FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLGY, MINNA
ADVANCED MICROBIOLIAL GENETICS (MCB 624)
COURSE LECTURER
DR. M.E. ABALAKA
FEBRUARY, 2015
2
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title page … … … … … … … 1
Table of Content … … … … … … … 2
SUMMARY … … … … … … … 3
1.0 Introduction … … … … … … … 4
2.0 Fermentation … … … … … … … 5
2.1 Fermentation Industries … … … … … … … 7
2.2 The Range Of Fermentation Processes … … … … … 8
2.3 Fermentation Using Whole Living Cell … … … … … 9
2.3.1 Comparative Advantages of Fermentations Using Whole Cells and Isolated
Enzymes … … … … … … … … 9
2.4 The Process of Enzyme Technology … … … … … 11
3.0 The Relationship of Genetics To Fermentation… … … … … 12
3.1 Genetic Engineering and Fermentation Industry … … … … 15
3.2 Fermentation Efficiency … … … … … … 16
3.3 Protein Engineering: Applications In Food Industry … … … … 17
3.4 Environmental Assessment of Increased Fermentation Efficiency… … 18
3.5 The Genetic Engineering Applications: Improving Brewing, Wine-Making and Baking
Yeasts … … … … … … … … 19
3.6 Genetic Engineering for Improved Xylose Fermentation By Yeasts … … 20
Conclusion … … … … … … … … 22
References … … … … … … … … 24
3
SUMMARY
The application of modern biotechnology to food production presents new opportunities and
challenges for human health and development. Recombinant gene technology, the most well-
known modern biotechnology, enables plants, animals and microorganisms to be genetically
modified (GM) with novel traits beyond what is possible through traditional breeding and
selection technologies. It is recognized that techniques such as cloning, tissue culture and
marker-assisted breeding are often regarded as modern biotechnologies, in addition to genetic
modification (WHO, 2005). Essentially, biotechnology harnesses the catalytic power of
biological systems, whether by direct use of enzymes or through the use of the intricate
biochemistry of whole cells and micro-organisms. Biotechnology involves the use in industry of
living organisms or their components i.e. enzyme. It includes the introduction of genetically
engineered micro-organisms into a variety of industrial processes. Because nearly all the
products of biotechnology are manufactured by micro-organisms, fermentation is an
indispensable element of biotechnology’s support system. Defined in this way, biotechnology
encompasses everything from the technology of bread-making to that implicated in the
manufacture of human insulin from a bacterium induced to take up a non-bacterial gene and
produce the protein coded by that gene (Peacock, 2010). Many traditional fermentations rely
upon the hydrolytic actions of indigenous or deliberately added enzymes. These enzymes derive
from the metabolic activities of acceptable microbes or extracts of plant materials or animal
glands. In recent and scientifically informed times these activities have been identified and
frequently isolated to provide enhanced potency and controlled action resulting in a substantial
industrial production of commercial enzymes (Godfrey, 1997). The potential of biotechnology
for increasing agricultural productivity is high, in terms of both increasing the yields of
cultivated plants and of obtaining foodstuffs with higher nutritional value. Numerous foodstuffs
are manufactured using fermentation, and enzymes are now widely used as processing aids in
food manufacturing. Acetone, citric acid, ethanol, and other chemicals are, or have been,
produced industrially by fermentation (OTA, 1984; Stanbury, et al., 2003). This review paper
examines the role of genetic engineering in fermentation technology with particular reference to
the food industry.
4
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Biotechnology dates from the dawn of civilization, where the earliest farmers selected edible
plants to grow as crops and saved some of the seeds for the next season, and domesticated cattle,
pigs, sheep, and goats. Over the years, farmers bred both the plants and animals they liked and
learned how to best produce them with irrigation and weed control for plants and growing grain
and forages for the animals. Early civilizations around the globe also used yeast to make alcohol
and bread—yeast being a living microorganism (a fungus)—long before its role in fermentation
was understood (Peacock, 2010). Biotechnology involves the use in industry of living organisms
or their components (such as enzymes). It includes the introduction of genetically engineered
micro-organisms into a variety of industrial processes (OTA, 1984). The European Federation of
Biotechnology defined “Biotechnology is the integration of natural sciences and engineering
sciences in order to achieve the application of organisms, cells, parts thereof and molecular
analogues for products and services” (Buchholz, et al., 2005). According to the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (CAC 2001a), modern biotechnology is defined as the application of
(i.) in vitro nucleic acid techniques, including recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and
direct injection of nucleic acid into cells or organelles, or (ii.) fusion of cells beyond the
taxonomic family, that overcome natural physiological reproductive or recombination barriers,
and that are not techniques used in traditional breeding and selection (WHO, 2005). Peacock,
2010 states that biotechnology is the manipulation of living organisms for purposes other than
their original intent. It is nearly as old as civilization itself. It began with food; agriculture in its
most basic sense is biotechnology.
The field of biotechnology has been divided using colours namely; red, green, white and blue.
Red biotechnology relates to medicine, and green biotechnology relates to food, white
5
biotechnology, also called industrial biotechnology, uses natural processes such as fermentation
and enzymes to create products formerly made with chemicals. Bioplastics made with vegetable
oil and starches instead of petroleum are examples of white biotechnology. Blue biotechnology
encompasses all aspects of marine biology and genomics (Peacock, 2010).
Biotechnology persists to generate new tools and techniques based on molecular and genomic
approaches to food, nutrition, health and well-being. Biotechnology offers the potential for
greater efficiency for producers and processors, as well as additional benefits for consumers. In
foods, biotechnology may allow better and more efficient use of raw materials and by-products,
through improved and novel enzymes and microbes optimised for fermentation. Biotechnology
could also improve food safety and ensure traceability across the food chain (GOS, 2012).
One of the primary goals of biotechnology is to feed the world’s 6 billion people, but there is
substantial disagreement over the best way to accomplish this (Peacock, 2010). In the agro-food
industry, biotechnology continues to generate new tools and techniques based on molecular and
genomic approaches to food, nutrition, health and well-being. Biotechnology offers the potential
for greater efficiency for producers and processors, as well as additional benefits for consumers.
In foods, biotechnology may allow better and more efficient use of raw materials and by-
products, through improved and novel enzymes and microbes optimised for fermentation.
Biotechnology could also improve food safety and ensure traceability across the food chain. For
example, state-of-the-art polymerase chain reaction based tests will radically cut the time it takes
to find and identify pathogenic bacteria in food, while increasing the sensitivity with which
pathogens can be detected (GOS, 2012).
6
Historically, biotechnology can be divided into three groups;
Fermentation processes are mostly concerned with improvement of new phyla of
microorganisms and their innovation in the course of their cultivation.
Use of biotechnological processes for elimination of toxic and other wastes and for
transformation of these wastes to non-toxic compounds that can be further utilized.
Techniques of genetic and cellular manipulation followed by cultivation of animal cells,
plant cells and microorganisms.
2.0 FERMENTATION
Zymotechnology is the science of fermentation, and it is often considered the forerunner of
modern biotechnology (Peacock, 2010). Fermentation is one of the oldest methods of food
processing. The history of fermented foods has early records in Southeast Asia, where China is
regarded as the cradle of mold-fermented foods, and in Africa where the Egyptians developed
the concept of the combined brewery-bakery (Nout, et al., 1986; McNeil and Harvey, 2008).
Fermentation has been used for preserving food for hundreds of years and virtually every culture
has, as part of its diet, a variety of fermented milk, meat, vegetable, fruit, or cereal products.
Microorganisms, including bacteria, yeasts, and mold, produce a wide range of metabolic end
products that function as preservatives, texturizers, stabilizers, and flavoring and coloring agents
(Harlander, 1992). Microbial fermentation is essential to production of wine, beer, bologna,
buttermilk, cheeses, kefir, olives, salami, sauerkraut, and many more. The metabolic end
products produced by the microorganisms flavor fermented foods. For example, mold-ripened
cheeses owe their distinctive flavors to the mixture of aldehydes, ketones, and short-chain fatty
acids produced by the fungi (Glazer and Nikaido, 2007).
7
2.1 FERMENTATION INDUSTRIES
The food processing, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries make up the three major users of
fermentation taking advantage of advances in molecular genetics (OTA, 1984). Nearly all the
products of biotechnology are manufactured by microorganisms; fermentation is an
indispensable element of biotechnology’s support system. These industries have benefited
immensely from these new discoveries. Industrial fermentation processes begin with suitable
microorganisms and specified conditions; e.g., careful adjustment of nutrient concentration. The
products are of many types: alcohol, glycerol, and carbon dioxide from yeast fermentation of
various sugars; butyl alcohol, acetone, lactic acid, monosodium glutamate, and acetic acid from
various bacteria; citric acid, gluconic acid, and small amounts of antibiotics, vitamin B12, and
riboflavin (vitamin B2) from mold fermentation (OTA, 1984; Sahlin, 1999; Dequin, 2001;
Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014).
Two processes now exist both of which benefit from genetic engineering;
Fermentation technology, living organisms serve as miniature factories, converting raw
materials into end products.
Enzyme technology, biological catalysts extracted from living organisms are used to make
the products.
The food industry was the first to exploit microorganisms to produce alcoholic beverages and
fermented foods. In the early 20th century, the chemical industry began to use the technology to
produce organic solvents like ethanol, and enzymes like amylase, used at the time to treat
textiles. Following the end of World War II, the pharmaceutical industry, began applying
fermentation to the production of vitamins and new antibiotics (OTA, 1984).
8
2.2 THE RANGE OF FERMENTATION PROCESSESS
The modern fermentation industry, which is largely a product of the Twentieth century, is
dominated by aerobic cultivations intended to make a range of higher value products than simple
ethanol (McNeil and Harvey, 2008). Stanbury et al., 2003 have identified that they are five major
groups of commercially important fermentations;
i.) Those that produce microbial cells (for biomass) as the product.
ii.) Those that produce microbial enzymes.
iii.) Those that produce microbial metabolites.
iv.) Those that produce recombinant products.
v.) Those that modify a compound which is added to the fermentation – the
transformation process.
Today, approximately 200 companies in the United States and over 500 worldwide use
fermentation technologies to produce a wide variety of products. Most use them as part of
production processes, usually in food processing. But others manufacture either proteins, which
can be considered primary products, or a host of secondary products, which these proteins help
produce. For genes can make enzymes, which are proteins; and the enzymes can help make
alcohol, methane, antibiotics, and many other substances (OTA, 1984; Stanbury, et al., 2003).
Fermentation technologies are so useful for producing proteins partly because these are the direct
products of genes. But proteins (as enzymes) can also be used in thousands of additional
conversions to produce practically any organic chemical and many inorganic ones as well (OTA,
1984; McNeil and Harvey, 2008).
9
2.3 FERMENTATION USING WHOLE LIVING CELL
Originally, fermentation used some of the most primitive forms of plant life as cell factories e.g.
Bacteria were used to make yogurt and antibiotics
Yeasts to ferment wine
The filamentous fungi or molds to produce organic acids
More recently, fermentation technology has begun to use cells derived from higher plants and
animals under growth conditions known as cell or tissue culture. In all cases, large quantities of
cells with uniform characteristics are grown under defined, controlled conditions (OTA, 1984;
Stanbury, et al., 2003).
2.3.1 COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES OF FERMENTATIONS USING WHOLE
CELLS AND ISOLATED ENZYMES
The field which studies the use of enzymes or whole cells as biocatalysts for industrial synthetic
chemistry is known as Biocatalysis (Johannes, et al., 2006). They have been used for hundreds of
years in the production of alcohol via fermentation, and cheese via enzymatic breakdown of milk
proteins. Microbial cells play a leading role in ‘chemo-enzymatic synthesis’ because of their
great diversity. Several microbes with unique catalytic abilities have been found through
intensive screening and put to practical use (Ishige, et al., 2005; Buchholz, et al., 2005).
Over the past few decades, major advances in our understanding of the protein structure–function
relationship have increased the range of available biocatalytic applications. In particular, new
developments in protein design tools such as rational design and directed evolution have enabled
10
scientists to rapidly tailor the properties of biocatalysts for particular chemical processes
(Johannes, et al., 2006).
Johannes, et al., 2006 and Ishige, et al., 2005 give the following as advantages of whole cell
fermentation over isolated enzymes;
1.) Compared with isolated enzymes, whole cell catalysts can be much more readily and
inexpensively prepared. Because enzymes in cells are protected from the external
environment, they are generally more stable in the long-term than free enzymes.
2.) The whole-cell biocatalysis approach is typically used when a specific biotransformation
requires multiple enzymes or when it is difficult to isolate the enzyme.
3.) A whole-cell system has an advantage over isolated enzymes in that it is not necessary to
recycle the cofactors (non-protein components involved in enzyme catalysis).
4.) In addition, it can carry out selective synthesis using cheap and abundant raw materials
such as corn starches.
5.) Microbial cells have been most commonly used for industrial purposes because of their
diversity and ease of handling. Rapid advances in the life sciences have greatly increased
the availability of whole cell catalysts. The recombinant DNA technique is a good
example.
6.) It has enabled the overproduction of a desired enzyme in various heterologous hosts
(microorganism, plant, and animal cells), and it allows the use of cells as ‘bags stuffed
with catalysts’. This technique has even made it possible to modify metabolic pathways
in the host cells, such as cofactor regeneration systems, biosynthesis of complex
metabolites, etc.
11
2.4 THE PROCESS OF ENZYME TECHNOLOGY
Fermentation carried out by live cells provided the conceptual basis for designing fermentation
processes based on isolated enzymes. A single enzyme situated within a living cell is needed to
convert a raw material into a product. A lactose-fermenting organism, e.g., can be used to
convert the sugar lactose, which is found in milk, to glucose (and galactose). But if the actual
enzyme responsible for the conversion is identified, it can be extracted from the cell and used in
place of a living cell. The purified enzyme carries out the same conversion as the cell, breaking
down the raw material in the absence of any viable micro-organism. An enzyme that acts inside a
cell to convert a raw material to a product can also do this outside of the cell (OTA, 1984;
Bornscheuer, et al., 2012).
Enzyme technology – a sub-field of biotechnology – new processes have been and are being
developed to manufacture both bulk and high added- value products utilizing enzymes as
biocatalysts, in order to meet needs such as food (e.g., bread, cheese, beer, vinegar), fine
chemicals (e.g., amino acids, vitamins), and pharmaceuticals. Enzymes are also used to provide
services, as in washing and environmental processes, or for analytical and diagnostic purposes
(Buchholz, et al., 2005).
The technology for producing and using commercially important enzyme products combines the
disciplines of microbiology, genetics, biochemistry and engineering, which have developed and
matured through time both singly and in an interactive manner. Demands for new enzymes arise
from the development of new processes or from the unsatisfactory performance of known
enzymes in established processes. The revolution in gene technology over the last two decades
has had a big impact on enzyme industry. Genetic engineering techniques have enabled enzyme
12
manufactures to produce sufficient quantities of almost any enzyme no matter what the source,
while protein engineering allows the properties of the enzymes to be adjusted prior to production
(Hatti-Kaul, 2009).
Production of new microbial enzyme starts with screening of microorganisms for desirable
activity using appropriate selection procedures. The level of enzyme activity produced by an
organism from a natural environment is often low and needs to be elevated for industrial
production. Increased in enzyme levels is often achieved by mutation of the organism. An
alternative strategy that has gained favour is production of the enzyme in a recombinant
organism of choice whose growth conditions are well optimized and whose GRAS status is
established. Random or site directed mutagenesis with the purpose of engineering the activity
and stability properties of an enzyme prior to its production is becoming a common practice. The
microorganisms used for enzyme production are grown in fermenters using an optimized growth
medium. Both solid state and submerged fermentation are applied commercially; however the
latter is preferred in many countries because of a better handle on aseptic conditions and process
control. The enzymes produced by the microorganism may be intracellular or secreted into the
extracellular medium (Sahlin, 1999; Buchholz et al., 2005; Hatti-Kaul, 2009).
3.0 THE RELATIONSHIP OF GENETICS TO FERMENTATION
Applied genetics is intimately tied to fermentation technology, since finding a suitable species of
micro-organism is usually the first step in developing a fermentation technique. Until recently,
geneticists have had to search for an organism that already produced the needed product.
However, through genetic manipulation a totally new capability can be engineered; micro-
13
organisms can be made to produce substances beyond their natural capacities (OTA, 1984;
Dequin, 2001; Lennox, et al., 2003).
The genetic improvement of industrial strains traditionally relied on classical genetic techniques
(mutagenesis, hybridization, protoplast fusion, cytoduction), followed by selection for broad
traits such as fermentation capacity, ethanol tolerance, absence of off-flavours (e.g. H2S for wine
strains), fast dough fermentation, osmo-tolerance, rehydration tolerance, organic acid resistance
(baker’s strains), flocculation and carbohydrate utilization (brewer’s strains) (Dequin, 2001;
Hatti-Kaul, 2009).
Current industrial approach to fermentation technologies therefore considers two problems:
First, whether a biological process can produce a particular product
Second, which micro-organism has the greatest potential for production and how the
desired characteristic can be engineered for producing more of it.
The rapid development of ‘white biotechnology’ involves a continuous search for more efficient
organisms to provide the fermentation of the various products. This development comprises both
the identification and selection of the most suitable host organisms and the genetic modification
of these organisms (DME, 2006). Finding the desired micro-organism and improving its
capability is so fundamental to the fermentation industry that geneticists have become important
members of fermentation research teams.
1.) Genetic engineering can increase an organism’s productive capability (a change that can
make a process economically competitive) but it can also be used to construct strains with
characteristics other than higher productivity.
2.) Properties such as objectionable color, odor, or slime can be removed.
14
3.) The formation of spores that could lead to airborne spread of the microorganism can be
suppressed.
4.) The formation of harmful byproducts can be eliminated or reduced.
5.) Other properties, such as resistance to bacterial viruses and increased genetic stability, can
be given to micro-organisms that lack them.
Applying recent genetic engineering techniques to the production of industrially valuable
enzymes may also prove useful in the future (OTA, 1984; Ishige, et al., 2005; Johannes, et al.,
2006; Bornscheue, et al., 2012).
In recent times, the genetic characterization of micro-organisms has advanced at a rapid pace
with exponential growth in the collection of genome sequence information, high-throughput
analysis of expressed products i.e., transcripts and proteins and the application of bioinformatics
which allows high throughput comparative genomic approaches that provide insights for further
functional studies. Genome sequence information, coupled with the support of highly advanced
molecular techniques, have allowed scientists to establish mechanisms of various host-defensive
pathogen counter-defensive strategies and have provided industry with tools for developing
strategies to design healthy and safe food by optimizing the effect of probiotic bacteria, the
design of starter culture bacteria and functional properties for use in food processing.
Characterization of the genomes of lactic acid probiotics has, for example, shed light on the
interaction of pathogens with lactic acid bacteria (de Vos, 2001). Nucleotide sequences of the
genomes of many important food microbes have recently become available. Saccharomyces
cerevisiae was the first food microbe for which a complete genome sequence was characterized
(Goffeau, et al., 1996). This was followed by genome sequencing of the related yeast,
15
Kluyveromyces lactis (Bolotin-Fukuhara et al., 2000) as well as filamentous fungi which are
major enzyme producers and have significant applications in the food-processing industry (FAO,
2010).
3.1 GENETIC ENGINEERING AND FERMENTATION INDUSTRY
Genetic engineering has been defined as the artificial manipulation, modification, and
recombination of DNA or other nucleic acid molecules in order to modify an organism or
population of organisms (Britannica encyclopedia 2014). It refers to any process in which an
organism’s genome is intentionally altered. Genetic engineering does not encompass traditional
breeding techniques because it requires manipulation of an organism’s genes through cloning or
transformation via the addition of foreign DNA (Peacock, 2010).
Genetic engineering is not in itself an industry, but a technology used at the laboratory level. It
allows the researcher to alter the hereditary apparatus of a living cell so that the cell can produce
more or different chemicals, or perform completely new functions. For example, a DNA
fragment may be isolated from one organism, spliced to other DNA fragments, and put into a
bacterium or another organism. This process is called cloning because many identical copies can
be made of the original DNA fragment. In another example of genetic engineering, a stretch of
DNA, often an entire gene, may be isolated and its nucleotide sequence determined, or its
nucleotide sequence may be altered by in vitro mutagenic methods. These and related activities
in genetic engineering have two basic objectives: to learn more about the ways nature works and
to make use of this knowledge for practical purposes (OTA, 1984; Schleif, 1993).
Regardless of the industry, the same three criteria must be met before genetic technologies can
become commercially feasible. They include the need for:
16
1.) A useful biochemical product;
2.) A useful biological fermentation approach to commercial production; and
3.) A useful genetic approach to increase the efficiency of production.
The three criteria interrelate and can be met in any order; the demonstration of usefulness can
begin with any of the three. Insulin, e.g., was first found to have value in therapy; fermentation
was then shown to be useful in its production; and, now genetic engineering promises to make
the fermentation process economically competitive. In contrast, the value of thymosin a-1, has
not yet been proved, although the usefulness of genetic engineering and fermentation in its
production have been demonstrated (OTA, 1984; Schleif, 1993).
3.2 FERMENTATION EFFICIENCY
The development that has taken place over the past decade in this area is unprecedented with
respect to the efficiency increases it has provided for the industrial processes based on
fermentation. Increases in efficiency/yield of 5-10% are common, and this exceeds the parallel
efficiency increases of any competing technologies by far. Genetic modification in this way
provides a technology leap favouring the use of fermentation processes radically and implying a
continued efficiency improvement of any fermentation operation, and thereby also an
environmental efficiency increase. Moreover, the fermentation efficiency increase leads to
increased cost efficiency of enzyme production, and this strongly contributes to the continuous
gain of new fields of enzyme application from conventional processes using chemical auxiliaries
(DME, 2006).
17
3.3 PROTEIN ENGINEERING: APPLICATIONS IN FOOD INDUSTRY
An important application area of protein engineering regarding food industry is the wheat gluten
proteins. Their heterologous expression and protein engineering has been studied using a variety
of expression systems, such as E.coli, yeasts or cultured insect cells. Wild type and mutant wheat
gluten proteins were produced to compare them to each other for protein structure-function
studies. Generally, E.coli expression systems were suggested as suitable systems for many
applications, because of their availability, rapid and easy use, as well as high expression levels
(Tamas & Shewry, 2006). Food industry makes use of a variety of food-processing enzymes,
such as amylases and lipases, the properties of which are improved using recombinant DNA
technology and protein engineering. The deletion of native genes encoding extracellular
proteases, for example, increased enzyme production yields of microbial hosts. In fungi, for
example, the production of toxic secondary metabolites has been reduced to improve their
productivity as enzyme-producing hosts (Olempska-Beer et al., 2006; Johannes, et al., 2006).
In food industry, amylases are used for liquefaction and saccharification of starch, as well as in
adjustment of flour and bread softness and volume in baking (Kirk et al., 2002). Recently, the
production of “functional foods” is becoming increasingly important for food industry.
Particularly, the production of industrial products and functional foods from cheap and
renewable raw agricultural materials is desirable. Conversion of starch to bioethanol or to
functional ingredients like fructose, wine, glucose and trehalose, for example, has been studied.
Such a conversion requires microbial fermentation in the presence of biocatalysts such as
amylases to liquefy and saccharify starch. To improve the industrially important properties of
amylases, such as high activity, high thermo- and pH-stability, high productivity, etc.;
recombinant enzyme technology, protein engineering and enzyme immobilization have been
18
used. In a recent review article, rice was given as a typical example for biocatalytical production
of useful industrial products and functional foods from cheap agricultural raw materials and
transgenic plants (Akoh et al., 2008; Turanli-Yildiz, et al., 2012).
Another major group of enzymes utilized by food industries is constituted by lipases. They are
used in many applications of food industry such as for the stability and conditioning of dough (as
an in situ emulsifier), and in cheese flavour applications (Kirk et al., 2002). As lipases are
commonly used in food industrial applications, having toxicologically safe lipases is an
important requirement of food industry. The commercial lipase isoform mixtures prepared from
Candida rugosa meet this requirement. Obtaining pure and different C. rugosa lipase isoforms is
possible by means of computer modelling of lipase isoforms, and protein engineering methods
such as lid swapping and DNA shuffling (Akoh et al., 2008; Ishige, et al., 2005; Turanli-Yildiz,
et al., 2012).
3.4 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF INCREASED FERMENTATION
EFFICIENCY
The environmental aspects of the achieved increase in fermentation efficiency are quite
unambiguous. The efficiency increase leads to resource savings on both raw materials, energy,
water and other auxiliaries involved in the fermentation. Consequently, environmental impacts
from the production of such resources are reduced accordingly. An increase of 5-10% per years
corresponds to a halving of resource consumption and its related environmental impact over
around 10-20 years provided that the efficiency increase stay at the same level as seen over the
latest years (the realism of this has not been evaluated). The potential environmental trade-off is
the use of more genetic modification that underlies the efficiency increase (DME, 2006).
19
3.5 THE GENETIC ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: IMPROVING BREWING,
WINE-MAKING AND BAKING YEASTS
Yeasts are one of the most important groups of microorganisms in food industry and alcohol
production. Saccharomyces ceravisiae, is a species of budding yeasts. Throughout history, yeast
has proven to be very useful to mankind due to its essential role in the production of beer, bread,
and wine. Recently, it has proved useful for the production of enzymes, pigments, antioxidants,
and for various other medical applications (Hesham, 2010). The genetic improvement of
industrial strains traditionally relied on classical genetic techniques (mutagenesis, hybridization,
protoplast fusion, cytoduction), followed by selection for broad traits such as fermentation
capacity, ethanol tolerance, absence of off-flavors (e.g. H2S for wine strains), fast dough
fermentation, osmotolerance, rehydration tolerance, organic acid resistance (baker’s strains),
flocculation and carbohydrate utilization (brewer’s strains) (Dequin, 2001).
One major advantage of gene technology over classical genetic techniques is that just one
characteristic can be precisely modified, without affecting other desirable properties. In addition,
molecular biology approaches have introduced a new dimension. The expression of heterologous
genes has substantially increased the possibilities. In the past decade, impressive progress has
been made in the development of molecular techniques for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These
advances have been successfully applied to industrial strains in the past decade, allowing the
development of a new generation of specialized industrial yeast strains. Dequin, 2001 states that
the principal targets for strain development fall into two broad categories:
1.) Improvement of fermentation performance and simplification of the process and
2.) Improvement of product quality, e.g. organoleptic and hygienic characteristics.
20
Classical genetic approaches were first applied to wine yeast strains in the middle of the 1980s,
in response to increasing demand for new characteristics resulting from the development of pure
culture strains. Strains with new properties, e.g. with mitochondrial markers, flocculation
properties or expressing the killer toxin, have been generated by mutagenesis, hybridization or
cytoduction (Barre et al. 1993; Dequin, 2001).
3.6 GENETIC ENGINEERING FOR IMPROVED XYLOSE FERMENTATION BY
YEASTS
A few yeasts are known to ferment xylose directly to ethanol. However, the rates and yields need
to be improved for commercialization. Xylose utilization is repressed by glucose which is
usually present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, so glucose regulation should be altered in order to
maximize xylose conversion. Xylose utilization also requires low amounts of oxygen for optimal
production. Respiration can reduce ethanol yields, so the role of oxygen must be better
understood and respiration must be reduced in order to improve ethanol production. This is being
made possible by using genetic engineering (Jeffries and Shi, 1999).
Xylose is the second most abundant carbohydrate in the lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysate. The
fermentation of xylose is essential for the bioconversion of lignocelluloses to fuels and
chemicals. A few yeasts are known to ferment xylose directly to ethanol. However, the rates and
yields need to be improved for commercialization. Wild-type strains of Saccharomyces
cerevisiae are unable to utilize xylose. A modified genome shuffling method was developed to
improve xylose fermentation by S. cerevisiae. Recombinant yeast strains were constructed by
recursive DNA shuffling with the recombination of entire genome of P. stipitis with that of S.
21
cerevisiae. After two rounds of genome shuffling and screening, one potential recombinant yeast
strain ScF2 was obtained. It was able to utilize high concentration of xylose and produced
ethanol. The recombinant yeast ScF2 produced ethanol more rapidly than the naturally occurring
xylose-fermenting yeast (Jeffries and Shi, 1999; Siddique, 2013).
22
CONCLUSION
Biotechnology continues to generate new tools and techniques based on molecular and genomic
approaches to food, nutrition, health and well-being. Biotechnology offers the potential for
greater efficiency for producers and processors, as well as additional benefits for consumers. In
foods, biotechnology may allow better and more efficient use of raw materials and by-products,
through improved and novel enzymes and microbes optimised for fermentation. It could also
improve food safety and ensure traceability across the food chain (GOS, 2012).
Fermentation has contributed much to the well-being and wealth of human populations over
millennia; it will continue to do so to an even greater extent in the future. The demand for
fermentation skills is likely to increase in the immediate future (McNeil and Harvey, 2008). The
fermentation industry today is very much in a state of flux, with rapid changes in location,
product spectrum, and scale of processes occurring. To a large extent this has been brought about
by macroeconomic forces compelling the relocation of large scale bioprocesses outside high
labour cost regions, but also by the successful deciphering of the human genome with its myriad
of new therapeutic targets, and the significant advances in the construction of advanced
fermentation expression systems for making novel proteins and antibodies (Stanbury, et al.,
2003; McNeil and Harvey, 2008).
The wide range of economic activities that are built around fermentation provide an illustration
of the potential of the new bio-economy. The new bio-economy will be a crucial part of the
future of agriculture, both by providing new technologies to improve varieties as well as
expanding the range of products that are produced by agriculture. It will lead to a transition to a
more sustainable economic system with more reliance on renewable resources and reuse. The
23
new bio-economy will require moving outside of our comfort zone and may require us to take
calculated risks, but within a technological framework, we can control and mitigate these risks.
The evolution of the new biotechnology, like the fermentation-based technology, will encounter
resistance, but its potential is so vast that it is likely to prevail (Ziberman and Kim, 2011).
24
REFERENCES
Akoh, C.C., Chang, SW., Lee, GC. & Shaw, J.F., (2008). Biocatalysis for the production of
industrial products and functional foods from rice and other agricultural produce. Journal
of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Vol.56, No.22, pp.10445-10451.
Barre, P., Vezinhet, F., Dequin, S., Blondin, B., (1993). Genetic improvement of wine yeasts. In:
Fleet GH (ed) Wine microbiology and biotechnology. Harwood, Chur, pp 265–287
Bolotin-Fukuharaa, M., Toffano-Nioched, C., Artiguenavee, F., Duchateau-Nguyend, G.,
Lemaireb, M., Marmeissec, R., Montrocherc, R., Roberte, C., Termierd, M., Winckere, P.
& Wésolowski–Louvelb, M. (2000). FEBS Letters 487:66–70.
Bornscheuer, U.T., Huisman, G.W., Kazlauskas, R.J., Lutz, S., Moore, J.C., & K. Robins (2012).
Engineering the thirdwave of biocatalysis. Nature; Vol 485, 185-194. Retrieved from
doi:10.1038/nature11117. Date 02/02/2015
Buchholz, K., Kasche, K., Bornscheuer, U.T., (2005). Biocatalysts and Enzyme Technology.
WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. Pages 1-26
de Vos, W.M. (2001). Advances in Genomics for Microbial Food Fermentation and Safety.
Current Opinion in Biotechnology 12: 493–498.
Dequin, S., (2001). The potential of genetic engineering for improving brewing, wine-making
and baking yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:577–588. Retrieved from DOI
10.1007/s002530100700. Date 18/02/2015
DME – Danish Ministry of the Environment (2006). Green Technology Foresight about
environmentally friendly products and materials - The challenges from nanotechnology,
biotechnology and ICT, Working Report No. 34, 2006.
Encyclopædia Britannica (2014). Biotechnology. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference
Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, Softcopy.
Encyclopædia Britannica (2014). Fermentation. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference
Suite. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica Softcopy.
25
FAO Technical paper (2010). Current status and options for biotechnologies in food processing
and in food safety in developing countries. FAO International Technical Conference held
at Guadalajara, Mexico, 1 – 4 March 2010. Retrieved from
www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/k6993e 18/02/2015
Glazer, A.N., and Nikaido, H., (2007), Microbial Biotechnology: Fundamentals of Applied
Microbiology. 2nd
Edn., Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge
CB2 8RU, UK. Retrieved from www.cambridge.org/9780521842105 03/02/2015
Godfrey, A., (1997). Production of industrial enzymes and some applications in fermented foods.
Microbiology of fermented foods, Pp 622-657
Goffeau, A., Barrell, B.G., Bussey, H., Davis, R.W., Dujon, B., Feldmann, H., Galibert, F.,
Hoheisel, J.D., Jacq, C., Johnston, M., Louis, E.J., Mewes, H.W., Murakami, Y.,
Philippsen, P., Tettelin, H. & Oliver, S.G. (1996). Life with 6000 Genes. Science 274: 546-
567
Gov., Office of Science UK - GOS (2012) Technology and Innovation Futures: UK Growth
Opportunities for the 2020s– 2012 Refresh. Retrieved at
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/288562/12-1157-
technology-innovation-futures-uk-growth-opportunities-2012-refresh.pdf. 02/02/2015
Harlander, S.K. (1992). Genetic Improvement of Microbial Starter Cultures. Chapter 2.
Applications of Biotechnology to Traditional Fermented Foods. Retrieved from
http://collections.infocollections.org/ukedu/ru/ 31/01/2015
Hatti-Kaul, R., (2009). Enzyme Production. Biotechnology, Vol. V. Encyclopedia of Life
Support Systems (EOLSS). Pages 1-7. Retrieved from www.eolss.net/Eolss-
sampleAllChapter.aspx 02/02/2015
Hesham, El-Latif Abd (2010). Genetic improvement of yeast for Bioethanol Fermentation.
Presented to Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture Assiut University. Retrieved
from www.isosugar.org/Egypt/TL.2.2.pdf 02/02/2015
26
Ishige, T., Honda, K., and Shimizu, S., (2005). Whole organism biocatalysis. Current Opinion in
Chemical Biology, 9:174–180, Retrieved from DOI 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.02.001.
18/02/2015
Jeffries, T.W., and Shi, N-Q., (1999). Genetic Engineering for Improved Xylose Fermentation by
Yeasts. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Vol. 65. Retrieved from
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10533434 02/02/2015
Johannes, T., Simudiak, M.R., & Zhao, H., (2006). Biocatalysis. Encyclopedia of Chemical
Processing. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1081/E-ECHP-120017565 Date 18/02/2015
Kirk, O., Borchert, TV. & Fuglsang, C.C., (2002). Industrial enzyme applications. Current
Opinion in Biotechnology, Vol.13, No.4, pp.345-351.
Lennox, P., Thiele, J.H., Kennedy, M., Underwood, S., Culliford, J., Walker, B., Christensen,
M., Jamieson, I., & Battye, J, (2003). Biotechnology for New Zealand engineers: A review.
Retrieved from http://www.ipenz.org.nz/ipenz/forms/pdfs/TreNz2.pdf?52376 02/02/2015
McNeil, B., and Harvey, L.M., (2008). Practical Fermentation Technology. John Wiley & Sons,
Ltd. PP 13-35
Nout, M.J.R, Rombouts, F.M, & Hautvast, G.J., (1989). Accelerated natural lactic fermentation
of infant food formulations. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 11, 65-73.
Office of Technology Assessment – OTA (1984). Impacts of Applied Genetics— Micro-
Organisms, Plants, and Animals: Ch. 3—Genetic Engineering and the Fermentation
Technologies. US Congress Publishers Pages 49-56. Retrieved at
http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc39450/. 02/02/2015.
Olempska-Beer, Z.S., Merker, RI., Ditto, MD. & DiNovi, MJ. (2006). Food-processing enzymes
from recombinant microorganisms – a review. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology,
Vol.45, No.2, pp.144-158.
27
Peacock, W.K., (2010) Global Issues: Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering. Infobase
Publishing. Retrieved from http://file.zums.ac.ir/ebook/082-
Biotechnology%20and%20Genetic%20Engineering%20%28Global%20Issues%29-
Kathy%20Wilson%20Peacock%20Charles%20Ph.D.%20Hage.pdf 02/02/2015
Sahlin, P., (1999) Fermentation as a Method of Food Processing (production of organic acids,
pH-development and microbial growth in fermenting cereals) Licentiate thesis May, Lund
University.
Schleif, R., (1993) Genetics and Molecular Biology. 2nd
Ed., The Johns Hopkins University
Press Baltimore, Maryland USA. Pages 281-290
Siddique, S., (2013). Role of genetic engineering in fermentation Technology. Assignment
presented to Sir Tahir Baig, School of Applied Bioscience, Atta-Ur-Rehman. Retrieved
from https://lecturesug3.files.wordpress.com/01/saima-siddique-role-genetic-engineering-
in-ft.docx 02/02/2015
Stanbury, P.F., Whitaker, A., & Hall, S.J., (2003) Principles of fermentation Technology. 2nd
Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann Publishers, UK.,
Tamas, L.. & Shewry, P.R.., (2006). Heterologous expression and protein engineering of wheat
gluten proteins. Journal of Cereal Science, Vol.43, No.3, pp.259-274.
Turanli-Yildiz, B., Alkim, C., and Cakar, Z.P., (2012). Protein Engineering Methods and
Applications: Chapter 2. Protein Engineering. Prof. Pravin Kaumaya (Ed.), InTech. Pp.,
10-25 Retrieved from http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/29172.pdf 10/02/2015
World Health Organization – WHO (2005). Modern food biotechnology, human health and
development: an evidence-based study. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
Retrieved from www.who.int/foodsafety 10/02/2015
Ziberman, D., and Kim, E., (2011). The Lessons of Fermentation for the New Bio-Economy.
AgBioForum, 14(3): 97-103. Retrieved from www.agbioforum.org/v14n3a01-zilberman
18/02/2015