THE GREEN MUNICIPALSCORECARD PROJECT REPORT

THE

GRE

EN M

UN

ICIP

AL

SCO

RECA

RD P

ROJE

CT

REPO

RT

WRITERSBahar YıldırımBurcu Genç Deniz ÖzkorEmin Alp BıyıkEmine TarhanHelin LaçinMustafa Dehmen Simin Kışınbay Şima Topaloğlu Yasemin KipkurtZeynep Arslan

*Ordered alphabetically.

First Editionİstanbul 2019

Yeşil Gelecek DerneğiGökalp Mh. Durulsoy İş Hanı 48. Sk. No:2 K:5 D:37 Zeytinburnu/İstanbul

https://yesilgelecekdernegi.org/info@yesilgelecekdernegi.org

PREFACEPROJECT TEAM

Local governments, which have the authority to make decisions and make plans, directly affect the environment we live in with the plans and projects they create. We believe that local ecological activities should be strengthened in order for the ecological struggle to be more permanent all over the world. For this reason, we took action in our local, inspired by the Argüden Academy Municipality Governan-ce Scorecard study, and we implemented the Green Municipal Scorecard Project.

We would like to sincerely thank our Advisory Bo-ard members; Prof. Dr. Semra Cerit Mazlum, Dr. Lecturer Member of. Sema Bayraktar, publishing director of EKOIQ and klimahaber.org Barış Doğru, Local Governance Expert İnan İzci from Argüden Governance Academy, Johanna Olsson from Lund University, Meryem Kayan, Head of Chamber of Environmental Engineers İstanbul Branch, İkbal Polat from Local-İz Association and Turkey 350.org Campaigns Officer Efe Baysal. We would like to thank our volunteers Bahar Yıldırım, Bilge Genç, Burcu Genç, Deniz Özkor, Emin Alp Bıyık, Emine Tarhan, Helin Laçin, Mustafa Dehmen, Simin Kirin-bay, Şima Topaloğlu, Yasemin Kipkurt and Zeynep Arslan who were in our research team.

We would like to thank the TMMOB Chamber of Environmental Engineers Istanbul Branch, TM-MOB Chamber of City Planners Istanbul Branch, and Marmara Municipalities Union, who helped us in the legislative scanning while preparing the indi-cators throughout the process.

We would like to thank Heinrich Böll Foundation Representation to Turkey for the support given to our project.

We hope that our work will be a reference to all local governments who want to be a green municipality and use it as a resource to refer to while advocating in the districts of the local.

Tabl

e of

Con

tent

s5452

631 INTRODUCTION

METHODOLOGY

INDICATOR SET

COASTAL REPORT

RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INTRODUCTION

57 EPILOGUE

58 BIBLIOGRAPHY

60 APPENDICES

12 SCORECARDS

1

INTRODUCTIONIn the Green Municipal Scorecard report, the cur-rent status of the district municipalities, which are the closest public institutions to citizens living in Istanbul, has been examined. Local governments are a form of public organization that can ensure the dissemination of democracy to the base and can take action more easily than the control mechanis-ms at the central level, where the decision-making bodies are directly elected by the people living in that district. (Oktay, 2009). In the Green Municipal Scorecard report, the current status of the district municipalities, which are the closest public instituti-ons to citizens living in Istanbul, has been examined. Local governments are a form of public organization that can ensure the dissemination of democracy to the base and take action more easily than the cont-rol mechanisms located at the central level, in which the decision-making bodies are directly elected by those living in that district. (Oktay, 2009). For this reason, the district municipalities are the instituti-ons that should work with the highest priority on environmental problems, considering the climate crisis. Local Agenda 21, which was created at the Rio United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in 1992, has proven to be an im-portant actor in combating environmental problems that are increasing on a global scale. Therefore, local governments have been given more effective duties in decision-making, planning, and implementation together with the NGO and all its stakeholders. (Ça-kır Sümer, 2009). Thanks to the fact that the distri-ct municipal services can spread more easily to the base, the smallest work to be done jointly with ever-yone’s participation will quickly reflect on people, other living things, and nature. The 3rd Article of the Environment Law No. 2872 shows that everyone can participate as stakeholders in local governments regarding participation. This Article;a) “Everyone, especially the administration, trade associations, unions, and non-governmental organizations, is responsible for the protection of the environment and prevention of pollution, and they are obliged to comply with the measures to be taken and the principles determined.

b) In all kinds of activities in the fields of envi-ronmental protection, prevention of environmental degradation, and elimination of pollution; The Min-istry and local governments cooperate with profes-sional associations, unions, and non-governmental organizations when necessary.(…)e) The right to participate is essential in the formation of environmental policies. Ministry and local governments, trade associations, unions, non-governmental organizations, and citizens are obliged to create an environment of participation in which they will exercise their right to environment. (2872 Environmental Law, 2006)Environment and environmental health and protec-tion of all living and non-living things are within the local governments’ scope of the service area. For this reason, environmental management has the respon-sibility for preventive, restorative, and improving policies in increasing the quality of life. The Green Municipality can be defined as a municipality which aims to achieve long-term planning by taking into account the environmental impact principle, to cre-ate preventive and restorative policies before envi-ronmental problems occur, to work in coordination with stakeholders, to work on reducing energy con-sumption, to provide local strengthening training on environmental problems and to find permanent solutions. (Kızılboğa, 2009). The understanding of Green Municipalism is clearly seen in the Europe-an Green Capital Award as the European Union initiative, which has been organized since 2008, to increase local governments’ motivation on environ-mental policies to comply with EU acquis policies such as environmental management pollution, dis-posal, and recycling. In addition, with the European Green Leaf Award, the award-winning competition organized for smaller cities since 2015, it is under-stood the importance given to the local government in the environmental policies of the European Un-ion. (Science for Environment Policy EC, 2018).Urban planning is very important for Green Mu-nicipalism. According to the United Nations World Cities Data Booklet (UN-Habitat World Cities Data Booklet 2018), it is estimated that 55.3% of the worldpopulation will live in cities in 2018, and 60% will live in cities in 2030. . Rapid urbanization causes increasingly irregular construction, inadequate and

2

overloaded infrastructure and services (such as was-te collection, water, and treatment systems, roads and transportation), air pollution, and unplanned urban sprawl. (United Nations, 2019). Today, cities are known to be responsible for 71% to 76% of the-ir CO₂ emissions. (United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, 2019). In the ‘Global Warming of 1.5⁰’ report pub-lished by the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change in October 2018, countries need to reduce their energy consumption, thus reducing carbon emissions to prevent the pre-industrial temperature from rising above 1.5⁰ by 2030. In order to reduce it, it has been reported that the transformations should start as soon as possible (Masson-Delmotte, 2018). Therefore, the Green Municipality should find so-lutions to reduce carbon emissions locally. While producing these, they should aim to eliminate envi-ronmental problems, reduce their carbon footprint through sustainable forest management, reduce heat island effects, determine and track natural assets. With alternative transportation systems investments aimed at reducing carbon emissions, bicycle roads, and integrated public transportation systems should ensure easy and clean transportation of people and increase the residents’ quality of life by saving ener-gy.Waste management is one of the most important elements for Green Municipalism. With the efforts to prevent the formation of waste, energy savings can be achieved in separation and disposal proces-ses, as well as contribute to the national economy. The Green Municipality should increase the on-site studies on packaged products, organic waste, hazar-dous waste, and waste oils, develop more stringent monitoring systems, and conduct investigations to protect public health by controlling nature-pollu-ting activities.Noise pollution, electromagnetic pollution, visu-al pollution, and light pollution are the topics that negatively affect the natural life and human health after air pollution. In order to prevent pollution, it is necessary to identify pollutants under four headin-gs, intervene and resolve them with legal penalties, and follow sustainable methods of struggle.The understanding of Green Municipalism aims to prevent the destruction of nature by reducing ener-gy consumption and saving it with the integrated

waste management system that prevents it from ex-ceeding the environmental carrying capacity and integrated city management with long years of con-tinuity by making people reconciled with their envi-ronment. This ideal situation can only be achieved by providing waste management systems, public transport, green spaces, green buildings, and encou-raging city residents to shop at local markets where local products are produced. This will increase ur-ban residents’ well-being in the long run (Science for Environment Policy EC, 2018).As a result, in this study that we have stated the re-asons above, Green Municipality Scorecards of the county municipalities located in Istanbul, the city with the highest population of Turkey, were prepa-red through the indicators created by the analysis and interpretation of national and international stu-dies. The study includes the topics of Climate Crisis, Energy, Air, Waste, Land Use, Water, Biodiversity, Environmental Management, Transportation, and Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light. Thus, it is ai-med to reveal the current status and performance analysis of each district municipality regarding the implementation of green municipality indicators. In addition, this study aims to be a source indicator for the strengthening and development of the green municipality understanding of all municipalities in our country, as well as Istanbul district municipali-ties.

3

METHODOLOGYwith renewable energy, increasing water quality and saving, preserving biodiversity, expanding urban green areas, protecting natural assets, preventing waste generation, supporting local ecological agri-culture production, promoting integrated transport systems with public transport to reduce carbon emis-sions and adoption of the climate justice principle have been at the forefront. Approach to the topics of Environmental Management, Energy, Transpor-tation, Climate Crisis Mitigation and Adaptation, Air, Water, Waste, Land Use, Noise-Visual-Electro-magnetic-Light, Biodiversity within the scope of the Green Municipality Project is as follows;I. Climate Crisis Mitigation and Adaptati-on: 39 questions were created for local governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and work on adaptation to the climate crisis.ii. Energy: 17 questions were created regar-ding the reduction of carbon emissions and energy efficiency.iii. Air: 23 questions were developed against air pollutant emissions.iv. Waste: 47 questions were created to plan and manage projects and activities covering the ge-neration, recycling, and/or disposal of waste.v. Land Use: 21 questions were created to make spatial planning effective in disaster preventi-on and adaptation.vi. Water: 21 questions were created about ta-king precautions that do not contain harmful che-micals and disease-causing organisms in the water.vii. Biodiversity: 33 questions were created for studies aimed at conservation and improvement in terms of sensitive ecosystems and biodiversity.viii. Environmental Management: 13 questi-ons were created under this heading regarding the responsible behavior and responsibility of local go-vernments towards nature.ix. Transportation: 15 questions were created to ensure that alternative transportation systems to reduce carbon emissions are integrated and easily accessible.x. Noise-Image-Electromagnetic-Light: Noise: 9 questions were created to prevent activities such as vehicle noise, fireworks, and loud music that affect natural life.Visual: 5 questions were created regarding the ac-tivities that prevent visual pollution that affect the

The Green Municipal Scorecard project aims to analyze local governments’ current situation and re-veal what can be done afterward. One of the parties of the local ecological struggle is local governments. The climate crisis affects the local population’s he-alth and well-being, changes the environment, da-mages living / non-living things, and infrastructure. Within the scope of the project, an advisory board was established with experts in their fields. Project steps, methods, applications were prepared by the advisory board and the project team. Initially, a li-terature search on green municipality, green cities, and environmental management was carried out, both nationally and internationally. The resources used are as follows: REC-Regional Environmental Center RFSC-Reference Framework for Sustaina-ble Cities SDGs-Sustainable Development Goals Arcadis Sustainability Index (2016) Bogazici University Sustainable Cities of Turkey Research (2011) Indicators for Sustainability (2012) Urban Sustainability Indicators Global City Indicators Facility UN-Habitat Ericsson Climate Report The Bogota Commitment and Action Agen-da UCLG-CGLU Green Cities Indicators Chamber of Environmental Engineers Tur-key - World Environment Day and Turkey Report (2019) OECD Green Growth in Cities 2013 EU Research and Innovation for Cities of the Future

In order to measure the current situation of local governments, the 12 main titles of the Green Cities Indicators were considered to form an indicator set. Two of the 12 titles have been evaluated together with other titles, taking into account local legislati-on. In the activities and plans of local governments, which are urban decision-making bodies; reducing energy consumption, replacing existing systems

4

iii. Annual Report: “An annual report is prepared every year, within the framework of accountability, by top managers and spending officials to whom ap-propriation is allocated with the budget. The senior manager prepares the administration activity re-port, which shows the administration’s activity re-sults, based on the unit activity reports prepared by the expenditure officials, and discloses them to the public. “(Law No. 5018)

As a result of the project team’s decision to act prima-rily in their own local area, the scorecarding metho-dology of the Green Municipal Scorecard Indicator Set was applied in the districts of Istanbul. Scoring has been made for 37 district municipalities except for the Adalar and Şile Municipalities since munici-palities with a population of less than 50,000 do not have to prepare strategic plans according to Article 41 of the Municipalities Law No. 5393. The strategic plan of the district municipalities in Istanbul for the period of 2015-2019, the performance reports star-ting from 2016 to 2019, the activity reports, and the official websites of the municipality have been evalu-ated and scored. Based on 37 district municipalities’ documents, among the questions in the indicator set, yes answers were written as “1”, and no answers were written as “0”, and analyzes were made for 249 indica-tors with the Excel tool. The overall score of the mu-nicipalities and their scores under each heading were determined, and Green Municipality Scorecards

structure application

measuring

natural life created by billboards and banners.Electromagnetic: 3 questions were formulated re-garding preventive actions to inspect base stations, high voltage lines, and small businesses that emit radiation.Light: 3 questions were formulated regarding the activities to prevent the lighting from affecting the natural life.All 249 indicators under ten main headings in the Green Municipal Scorecard Indicator Set are yes / no questions. The questions in the indicator set include structured and qualitative questions. The question “Is it ensured that urban wastes are col-lected separately according to their types?” is an example of the Green Municipal Scorecard Indica-tors that are found below. Indicators are classified as structure-application-measurement according to the framework they question within themselves. Each structure question also has an application and measurement question. With this classification, it is aimed to make an understandable method to be ap-plied in the future.I. Structure; It covers indicator questions where dif-ferent methods are developed in decision-making, service provision, corporate development processes, and related sub-processes.ii. Application; It covers indicator questions exam-ining the activities of structures.iii. Measuring; It covers measurable indicator ques-tions on access to applications and their sharing with the public.After preparing the indicators, Strategic Plan, Per-formance Program, and Activity Reports were scanned for local governments’ approaches and an-swers to the questions, and keyword searches were done through official websites. The contents of the relevant documents and their handling within the scope of the project are as follows;I. Strategic Plan: “It is the plan that includes the medi-um and long-term goals, basic principles and policies, goals and priorities, performance criteria of public administrations, the methods to be followed to reach these and resource distribution.” (Law No. 5018)ii. Performance Program: “Public administrations prepare a performance program that includes the ac-tivities and projects they will carry out, their resource needs, performance targets, and indicators.” (Law No. 5018)

5

were created with this scoring. In line with the per-centage calculation, special and general graphics of the municipalities were created.Responses for each indicator on the Green Munici-pal Scorecard Indicator set were sent to the munic-ipalities via e-mail. If there are points where they object to the scores, the necessary documents are requested to respond by e-mail with the bases.The resulting analysis has been interpreted in line with the Green Municipality Principles adopted by the project team. Green Municipality Principles; It consists of inclusiveness, advocacy, transparency, and consistency. The approach of the project team to the concepts is as follows;

I. Inclusion: It is an inclusive approach for all groups that are part of nature when making deci-sions, allocating resources, or providing services.ii. Advocacy: It is the implementation of concrete actions for the institutions’ decision-making pro-cesses, which are also responsible for matters out-side the legislation of the municipality.iii. Transparency: It is the complete sharing of the distribution of resource use, the announce-ment of services, and projects with the public.iv. Consistency: The decisions and approaches taken in the processes are compatible and integrated with each other in all plans and re-ports.

Although the main heading of air and water in the indicator set is scored in the Green Municipal Score-card according to the municipalities’ activities as it includes non-legislative activities, it is not included in the analysis part of the report. The top and lowest titles that the municipalities received except for the air and water headings and the titles above and be-low the general average were examined and evaluat-ed together. Solution suggestions for the topics with low scores were presented.Good practice examples were selected by examining the works of district municipalities outside the legis-lation one by one and determining the ones that are out of the indicator set questions and whose area of influence is most compatible with the Green Munic-ipality Principles.

6

INDICATOR SETCLIMATE CRISISAdaptationQ1. Is there a climate change unit?Q2. Is there a climate action plan?Q3. Is the climate action plan shared with the pub-lic?Q4. Is there a climate disaster risk analysis?Q5. Is the public informed about the climate disas-ter risk analysis?Q6. Are there any projects to reduce the Heat Island Effect?Q7. Are the quality and quantity of projects that re-duce the Heat Island Effect shared with the public?Q8. Does it work to reduce the effects of the climate crisis?Q9. Are efforts to reduce the effects of the climate crisis shared with the public?Q10. Does it cooperate with NGOs that work to re-duce the effects of the climate crisis?Q11. Is the cooperation with NGOs to reduce the effects of the climate crisis shared with the public?Q12. Is there a climate crisis management plan in the public health dimension?Q13. Is the climate crisis management plan in the public health dimension shared with the public?Q14. Are there rain collection ponds projects?Q15. Is the quantity and quality of the rain collec-tion ponds publicly shared?Q16. Are there infrastructure works for disasters such as floods, floods, floods?Q17. Are the quantity and quality of infrastructure works shared with the public for disasters such as floods, floods and floods?Q18. Is there a policy that enhances adaptation to climate change and climate resilience and promotes low greenhouse gas emissions?Q19. Are policies that increase adaptation to climate change and climate resilience and encourage low greenhouse gas emissions shared with the public?Q20. Is there a database that gives information about the climate crisis?Q21. Is the database where it gives information about the climate crisis publicly available?Q22. Is systematic observation or early warning sys-tem work done?

Q23. Are systematic observation or early warning system study results shared with the public?Q24. Are there studies or trainings to strengthen against climate change?Q25. Are studies and trainings aimed at strengthen-ing against climate change being announced?

MitigationQ26. Is there a unit working on an environmentally friendly building?Q27. Is there any building with a green certificate belonging to the municipality?Q28. Are the quality and quantity of buildings that have green certificates belonging to the municipality shared with the public?Q29. Is there a unit working on greenhouse gas?Q30. Is greenhouse gas emission calculation made?Q31. Is the greenhouse gas emission calculation publicly shared?Q32. Is there a municipal carbon emission calcula-tion?Q33. Is the carbon emission calculation of the mu-nicipality shared with the public?Q34. Is there a target to reduce carbon emissions?Q35. Is the target of reducing carbon emissions shared with the public?Q36. Has the Global Covenant of Mayors for Cli-mate and Energy been signed?Q37. Does it publicly disclose whether the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy fulfills its obligations?Q38. Does it use renewable energy to increase cli-mate change mitigation and adaptation initiatives?Q39. Is the information on how the renewable ener-gy produced is used shared with the public?

BIODIVERSITYBiodiversityQ40. Is there a unit working on biodiversity?Q41. Is work being done to prevent damage to sen-sitive ecosystems or to prevent existing damage?Q42. Are studies to prevent damage to sensitive eco-systems and to prevent existing damage shared with the public?Q43. Are there any work on afforestation?

7

INDICATOR SETQ65. Are spraying activities carried out in accord-ance with the ecosystem and biodiversity?Q66. Is the content, quantity and quality of spraying activities shared with the public?Q67. Are there local empowerment trainings on an-imal rights?Q68. Are training on animal rights publicly an-nounced?Q69. Is there in-house training for animal rights personnel?Q70. Is the quality and quantity of the training pro-vided to personnel on animal rights shared with the public?Q71. Is an animal ambulance available?Q72. Is animal ambulance accessible?

WASTEWaste Management and RecyclingQ73. Is there a unit working on waste management?Q74. Is it ensured that urban wastes are collected separately according to their types?Q75. Is the public informed about the separate col-lection of urban wastes according to their types?Q76. Are there any incentive practices for compost-ing?Q77. Is the public informed about the incentives for composting?Q78. Are preventive activities carried out against the waste produced?Q79. Are preventive actions regarding the waste produced reported to the public?Q80. Are the waste batteries collected?Q81. Is information given about the quality and quantity of the method in the collection of waste batteries?Q82. Are there waste collection points?Q83. Are waste collection points shared with the public?Q84. Is there a municipal recycling facility?Q85. Is the municipal recycling facility information shared with the public?Q86. Are packaging wastes collected separately at the source?Q87. Is information on separate collection of pack-aging waste shared with the public?

Q44. Is the quality and number of works on affores-tation shared with the public?Q45. Are studies carried out to prevent tree destruc-tion?Q46. Is the quality and number of works to prevent tree destruction shared with the public?Q47. Are studies conducted for healthy growth of plant species?Q48. Are studies on healthy growth of plant species shared with the public?Q49. Is there a designated area for biological diver-sity?Q50. Is the information on areas designated for bio-logical diversity shared with the public?Q51. Are invasive alien species being followed?Q52. Is the tracking process of invasive alien species publicly disclosed?Q53. Are studies carried out to prevent invasive al-ien species?Q54. Are the quality and quantity of the efforts to prevent invasive alien species shared with the pub-lic?Q55. Is there official development assistance for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems?Q56. Are the aids received for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and ecosystems shared with the public?Q57. Are there articles on animal rights in the stra-tegic plan?Q58. Are studies carried out to improve the quality of life of stray animals?Q59. Are the studies aimed at improving the life quality of stray animals shared with the public?Q60. Are the quantity and quality of animal rehabil-itation centers / temporary nursing homes shared?Q61. Is there free veterinary service for stray ani-mals?Q62. Are free veterinary services announced for stray animals?Q63. Are adoption activities carried out in animal rehabilitation centers / temporary nursing homes?Q64. Are adoption activities announced in animal rehabilitation centers / temporary nursing homes?

8

INDICATOR SETQ88. Is there a licensed company support in waste management?Q89. Is the licensed company information shared with the public in waste management?Q90. Are there information, training and seminars regarding waste?Q91. Are information, training and seminars an-nouncements regarding waste made?Q92. Are solid waste collection systems in coordina-tion with the public? Mobile apps, etc…Q93. Are waste collection-operation-disposal sys-tems carried out separately?Q94. Is information provided to the public about the quality and quantity of the waste collection-opera-tion-disposal system?Q95. Is an inventory done regularly on the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE)?Q96. Is the inventory study regarding the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE) shared with the public?Q97. Is Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE) recycled?Q98. Is the public informed about the quality and amount of recycling of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE)?Q99. Is the material required for the collection of wastes distributed locally?Q100. Is the public informed about the necessary material distributed for the collection of waste local-ly?Q101. Is construction waste (especially in the Urban Transformation process) subject to any control?Q102. Are the control results of construction waste (especially in the Urban Transformation process) shared with the public?Q103. Is asbestos control done?Q104. Are asbestos control results publicly disclosed?Q105. Is the waste tire collected?Q106. Are the waste tire collection data shared with the public?Q107. Is waste oil collected from homes?Q108. Is information provided to the public about the quality and quantity of waste oil collected from homes?

Q109. Is waste oil collected from workplaces?Q110. Is information provided to the public about the quality and quantity of waste oil collected from workplaces?Q111. Is there a contract between the waste oil re-covery facility and workplaces?Q112. Are inspections made for waste oil recovery?Q113. Are the public informed about waste oil col-lection?Q114. Are there any studies to reduce the use of plastic?Q115. Is there information available to the public on efforts to reduce plastic use?Q116. Is waste management training given to the employees of the institution?Q117. Is information given about the quality and quantity of the training provided to the employees of the institution?Q118. Is waste food recycled?Q119. Is the public informed about waste food recy-cling practices?

AIRAir QualityQ120. Is there any unit working on air quality man-agement?Q121. Is there an air quality management strategy?Q122. Is the air quality management strategy pub-licly shared?Q123. Are standards regarding ambient air quality being determined?Q124. Are standards on ambient air quality shared with the public?Q125. Is there an air quality measurement and eval-uation?Q126. Are air quality measurement and evaluation reports shared with the public?Q127. Are measures taken for poor air quality?Q128. Are the measures taken for low air quality shared with the public?Q129. Are international principles taken into ac-count in air quality standards?Q130. Is it shared with the public that international principles are taken into account in air quality stand-ards?

9

INDICATOR SETOver LimitQ131. Are compelling measures taken in cases where the legislation is not complied with?Q132. Are the compelling measures taken in cases where the legislation is not complied with, shared with the public?Q133. Does the municipality carry out any work on its own vehicles to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions?Q134. Is the work of the municipality on its own vehicles to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions shared with the public?Q135. Does the municipality carry out any work on its own buildings to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions?Q136. Is the work of the municipality on its own buildings to reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions shared with the public?Q137. Are the facilities that pollute the air inspected?Q138. Are the results of inspections of facilities pol-luting the air shared with the public?Q139. Are measures taken against odors and dust af-fecting natural life?Q140. Is the public informed about the measures taken against odors and dust affecting natural life?Q141. Is priority given to places where the limit val-ues for air quality are exceeded in planning?Q142. Are priorities given to places where the lim-it values for air quality are exceeded in planning shared?

WATERQualityQ143. Is there a unit working on surface water and groundwater?Q144. Have drinking water assets been detected?Q145. Are the detected drinking water assets shared with the public?Q146. Are all waste discharges to water controlled?Q147. Are all waste discharge inspection results made to water shared with the public?Q148. Is there a rainwater management?Q149. Is the quality and quantity of rainwater man-agement shared with the public?Q150. Is there a rainwater harvesting project?

Q151. Are the outputs of the rainwater harvesting project shared with the public?Q152. Is inspection of water networks or structures done?Q153. Are inspection results of water networks or structures publicly available?

Waste WaterQ154. Is there a unit working for the collection, treatment and discharge of urban wastewater from settlements?Q155. Are there any studies on the use of gray water?Q156. Are studies on the use of gray water shared with the public?Q157. Is wastewater treatment done?Q158. Is the public informed about wastewater treatment works?

SavingQ159. Is there a unit to reduce water use?Q160. Are any activities carried out to reduce water use?Q161. Are activities aimed at reducing water use shared with the public?Q162. Are studies conducted on the change of the water ecosystem over time?Q163. Is information provided about the change of the water ecosystem over time?

TRANSPORTATIONQ164. Is there a transport planning unit?Q165. Is there any plan to increase bike lanes?Q166. Are their efforts to increase bicycle lanes shared with the public?Q167. Are studies carried out to integrate bicycle lanes with public transport?Q168. Are the efforts to integrate bicycle lanes with public transport shared with the public?Q169. Are efforts being made to integrate pedestri-an roads with public transport?Q170. Are the efforts to integrate pedestrian roads with public transport shared with the public?Q171. Are there pedestrianization practices?Q172. Are pedestrianization practices shared with the public?

10

INDICATOR SETQ173. Are there any practices to reduce the carbon emissions of vehicles?Q174. Are any practices related to reducing the car-bon emissions of vehicles shared with the public?Q175. Does the municipality have an electric vehicle operation? Or application?Q176. Is the public informed about the quantity and quality of the municipality’s electric vehicle opera-tion? Or application?Q177. Is there any work on charging stations of elec-tric vehicles in the municipality?Q178. Is the public informed about the quantity and quality of the works for the charging stations of elec-tric vehicles in the municipality?

NOISE-VISUAL-ELECTROMAGNETIC-LIGHTNoiseQ179. Is there a noise monitoring unit?Q180. Are noise regulations made?Q181. Is the public informed about the noise regu-lations?Q182. Are there any studies to eliminate noise pol-lution?Q183. Is the public informed about the efforts to eliminate noise pollution?Q184. Are measures taken against noise that will af-fect natural life?Q185. Is the public informed about measures against noise that may affect natural life?Q186. Are there any efforts to ban the use of fire-works?Q187. Is information given to the public about the activities to ban the use of fireworks?

VisualQ188. Is there a visual pollution monitoring unit?Q189. Are studies done to eliminate visual pollu-tion?Q190. Is the public informed about the works to eliminate visual pollution?Q191. Are there any businesses imposed adminis-trative sanctions due to visual pollution?Q192. Is information given to the public about ad-ministrative sanctions for visual pollution?

LightQ193. Is there a light pollution monitoring unit?Q194. Are studies done to eliminate light pollution?Q195. Is the public informed about the efforts to eliminate light pollution?

ElectromagneticQ196. Is there an electromagnetic pollution moni-toring unit?Q197. Are studies done to eliminate electromagnetic pollution?Q198. Is the public informed about the efforts to eliminate electromagnetic pollution?

LAND USESustainable Land UseQ199. Is there a unit related to urban agriculture practices?Q200. Are there urban agriculture practices?Q201. Are the quality and quantity of urban agri-culture practices shared with the public?Q202. Does the municipality support ecological farming practices?Q203. Does the municipality share the ecological farming practices it supports with the public?Q204. Are studies carried out to increase the active green area per person?Q205. Is the increased square meter of active green area per capita shared with the public?Q206. Is there any increase or decrease in natural assets?Q207. Are the rates of increase or decrease in natu-ral assets shared with the public?Q208. Are there supports for food safety practices?Q209. Is the public informed about the supports for food safety practices?

Disaster AreaQ210. Is there a unit dealing with disasters and emergencies?Q211. Have earthquake areas been detected?Q212. Are the detected earthquake areas shared with the public through maps, reports, information notes?

11

INDICATOR SETQ213. Are flood areas detected?Q214. Are the detected flood areas shared with the public through maps, reports, information notes?Q215. If there is a flood area, are measures taken against it?Q216. Is the public informed about the measures taken?Q217. Is there a disaster emergency plan?Q218. Are progress and reports on the disaster emergency plan shared?Q219. Is the disaster emergency plan available to the public?

ENERGYRenewable EnergyQ220. Is there an energy unit within the municipal-ity?Q221. Are there clean renewable power plants?Q222. Are the quantity and quality of clean renewa-ble power plants shared with the public?Q223. Does it have work on saving electricity?Q224. Is information provided to the public about its energy saving efforts through the website and lo-cal resources?Q225. Does it support clean renewable energy gen-eration?Q226. Does it publicly announce that it supports clean renewable energy generation?Q227. Is there an in-house training on clean renew-able energy?Q228. Does it share the content and the quality of the in-house training on clean renewable energy with the public?

Energy EfficiencyQ229. Is there an in-house training on energy effi-ciency?Q230. Does it share the content and the quality of the in-house training on energy efficiency with the public?Q231. Is thermal insulation provided in institution buildings?Q232. Is the quantity and quality of the thermal in-sulation applied in institution buildings shared with the public?

Q233. Does it carry out public incentives for energy efficiency within the boundaries of the district?Q234. Are activities promoting energy efficiency conducted within the boundaries of the district an-nounced to the public?Q235. Are there any savings studies for city lighting?Q236. Are savings activities for city lighting an-nounced?

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTEnvironmental ManagementQ237. Is there an environmental directorate?Q238. Does the environmental unit have an elec-tronic database?Q239. Does it enable the environmental unit to dis-seminate environmental status reports?Q240. Does it support the development of environ-mentally friendly technologies?Q241. Does it transfer and spread environmentally friendly technologies?Q242. Is there a unit that will facilitate the participa-tion of the society in environmental management?Q243. Does the unit that will facilitate the partici-pation of the society in environmental management cooperate with NGO, public and universities?Q244. Does the unit that will facilitate the partici-pation of the society in environmental management inform about the services carried out with the NGO, the public and universities?Q245. Does the municipality have “Environmental Management Systems” certificate? (ISO 14001)Q246. Does it have connections with national and international environmental organizations?Q247. Are activities shared with national and inter-national environmental organizations?Q248. Does it have a signature in international con-ventions?Q249. Does it publicly disclose whether it fulfills its international contract obligations?

12

SCORECARDSISTANBUL

13

ARNAVUTKÖY 2,3 m2261.655

In the scorecard study, Arnavutköy Municipality has achieved an average of 28% success as a result of scoring the indicator set. Arnavutköy Municipality has reached 45% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istan-bul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions under the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in AN-NEX-1; It is among the positive works of Arnavut-köy Municipality to collect battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types and to receive the support of licensed companies in waste mana-gement. On the other hand, a regular inventory of the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE) and their recycling, cons-truction waste control, asbestos control and waste tires should be improved.Arnavutköy Municipality has achieved a success rate of 13% in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The gene-ral average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-1; It is among the positive works of Arnavutköy Municipality to imp-lement practices for disasters such as floods and to share them with the public. Aiming to reduce the effects of the climate crisis to become a Green Muni-cipality; It should develop its studies on implemen-tation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and a climate crisis management plan in the public health dimension, conducting climate disaster risk analysis, reducing the effect of heat island and preparing rainwater collection pool projects. According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix; It is among the positive works of Arna-vutköy Municipality to make carbon emission cal-culations. On the other hand, it should improve its work on green buildings, reducing carbon emissi-ons, and increasing the use of renewable energy.

14

ATAŞEHİR 1,2 m2423.372

Ataşehir Municipality is carrying out “Ataşehir District Air Quality Monitoring and Modeling Research Pro-ject” with the faculty members of Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Meteorology Engineering. With the mobile air quality monitoring station established within the project’s scope, it measures PM10, PM2.5, NO, NO2, SO2, O3, and CO values in hourly periods within the distri-ct boundaries. These measured values are shared with the municipality’s website, mobile application, and monthly reports. Ataşehir Municipality’s measuring of air quality periodically within the district’s bounda-ries and sharing the measurement results is a good example that is not seen in other district municipalities.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Ataşehir Municipality has achieved an average of 39% success as a result of scoring the indicator set. Ataşehir Municipality has reached 79% success in the title of “Waste”. The ge-neral average of 37 district municipalities in Istan-bul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-2; Ataşehir Municipality’s positive activi-ties include collecting household electrical and elec-tronic, tires, batteries, packaging, and oil wastes ac-cording to their types, informing public about this issue, getting licensed company support in waste management, encouraging composting, and con-trolling construction waste and asbestos. On the

other hand, it should improve its work on estab-lishing a recycling facility within its own structure, strengthening the local area in collecting waste, and ensuring waste food recycling.Ataşehir Municipality has achieved 7% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-2; To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles, encour-aging the use of electric vehicles, and producing al-ternative transportation solutions focused on bicy-cles and pedestrians.

15

AVCILAR 1,1 m2435.682

In the scorecard study, Avcılar Municipality has achieved an average of 19% success as a result of scoring the indicator set. Avcılar Municipality has reached 42% success in the title of “Biodiversity”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 46%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Bi-odiversity” title in ANNEX-3, Avcılar Municipality’s activities prevent afforestation and tree destruction and increase the quality of life of animals, and to protect their rights are among its positive activities. It should also improve its work on the subjects of spraying suitable for the ecosystem and biodiversity and using animal ambulances. Avcılar Municipality has achieved 5% success in the title of “Climate Cri-sis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-3; It is among the positive works of Avcılar Municipality to implement practices for disasters such as floods and to sha-re them with the public. Also, to reduce the effects of the climate crisis; It should develop its studies on implementation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and climate crisis management plan in the public health dimension, conducting climate disaster risk analysis, reducing the effect of heat island and preparing rainwater col-lection pool projects.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, to become a Green Municipality, it should improve its studies on carbon emission calculation, reducing carbon emission, increasing the use of renewable energy and green building.

16

BAĞCILAR 0,6 m2748.483

The fact that Bağcılar is the first district municipality to have a waste processing facility established within its own structure in 2015 is an important step taken against the climate crisis in a metropolis like Istanbul. Becau-se packaging wastes are the most significant pollutants of seas and oceans, threatening the aquatic ecosystem. Since it is a district with a residential and industrial concentration, waste separation is a good practice example.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Bağcılar Municipality has achieved an average of 31% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Bağcılar Municipality has reached 66% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 dis-trict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%. According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subti-tle in ANNEX-4; It is among the positive works of Bağcılar Municipality to collect household electri-cal and electronic, tire, battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types, to provide infor-mation on this subject, to receive licensed compa-ny support in waste management, to operate a re-cycling facility, to carry out construction waste and asbestos controls.

To become a Green Municipality; It should improve its work on the subjects of making regular inventory studies on the amount and types of Household Elec-trical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), encouraging composting, reducing the use of plastic, and ensur-ing waste food recycling.Bağcılar Municipality has achieved 7% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 24%. According to the answers to the ques-tions in the “Transportation” title in ANNEX-4; It should improve its studies on reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles, encouraging the use of elect-ric vehicles, and producing alternative transportati-on solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.

17

BAHÇELİEVLER 0,6 m2598.454

Bahçelievler Municipality has developed a waste toner collection project by doing a study that other munici-palities have not done on waste recycling. The waste toner is one of the materials that are highly harmful to the environment due to the heavy chemicals it contains. For this reason, Bahçelievler Municipality both separates wastes by collecting instead of disposal and prevents hazardous chemicals from directly mixing into the soil.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Bahçelievler Municipality has achieved an average of 33% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Bahçelievler Municipality has reached 67% success in the title of “Biodiversity”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 46%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Bi-odiversity” title in ANNEX-5, Bahçelievler Munici-pality’s activities for afforestation, prevention of tree destruction, and healthy growth of plant species, increasing the quality of life of animals, and pro-tecting their rights are among its positive works. It should also improve its work on preventing damage to sensitive ecosystems, tracking and blocking inva-sive alien species. Bahçelievler Municipality did not

show success under the title of “Energy”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul un-der this heading is 25%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-5, Bahçe-lievler Municipality should improve its work on sa-ving electricity, using renewable energy, and produ-cing and promoting its production, and providing in-house training on the subject.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex, to become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on thermal insulation in buildings, saving city lighting, providing in-house training on energy efficiency, and encouraging public opinion on this issue.

18

BAKIRKÖY 3,5 m2222.370

Bakırköy Municipality has conducted a 2-year study to achieve its Sustainable Development Go-als and published a report in 2018 with the theme “The Future Will Come With Us”. This re-source can be accessed from the link below. However, apart from this report, there is no ot-her report on sustainable development plans, and no report on the work done has been published.

Good Practice

2http://www.bakirkoy.bel.tr/hizmet/projeler/tamamlanan/22-gri-surdurulebilir-kalkinma-raporu.html

In the scorecard study, Bakırköy Municipality has achieved an average success of 18% as a result of scoring the indicator set.Bakırköy Municipality has reached 53% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in AN-NEX-6; It is among the positive works of Bakırköy Municipality to collect household electrical and ele-ctronic, tire, battery, packaging, and oil wastes ac-cording to their types, to inform the public about this issue, and to receive licensed company support in waste management. To become a Green Munici-pality; It should improve its work on construction waste control, asbestos control, encouraging com-posting, reducing the use of plastic, and ensuring waste food recycling. Bakırköy Municipality did not show success in the titles of “Energy” and “Noi-se-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light”.

The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul in these headings is 25% and 33%, respe-ctively.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-6, Bakır-köy Municipality should improve its activities on issues such as electricity-saving, use of renewable energy, production, promotion of its production, and in-house training.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex; It should improve its work on thermal insulation in buildings, saving on city lighting, providing in-hou-se training on energy efficiency, and encouraging public opinion on this issue.According to the answers to the questions in the “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light” title in AN-NEX-6, Bakırköy Municipality should improve its studies on controlling noise, image, electromagnetic and light pollution and reducing these pollutions.

19

BAŞAKŞEHİR 2,6 m2396.729

Başakşehir Municipality is implementing the “Waste Cash” project in order to contribute to recycling. Th-rough the application downloaded to smartphones, it is possible to collect money points from recycling, and they can use this money to shop. At the same time, the municipality rewards sites that use the application with garbage bags, containers, and money.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Başakşehir Municipality has achieved an average success of 22% as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Başakşehir Municipality has reached 55% success in the title of “Biodiversity”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 46%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Biodiversity” title in ANNEX-7; Başakşehir Muni-cipality’s activities for afforestation, preventing tree destruction and healthy growth of plant species, carrying out services to increase the life quality of animals and protect their rights, and spraying sui-table for the ecosystem and biodiversity are among its positive works.

To become a Green Municipality; It should improve its work on tracking and blocking invasive alien spe-cies, preventing damage to sensitive ecosystems, and using animal ambulances.Başakşehir Municipality has not shown success un-der the title of “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Li-ght”. The general average of 37 district municipali-ties in Istanbul under this title is 33%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light” title in AN-NEX-7, Başakşehir Municipality should improve its studies on controlling noise, visual, electromagnetic and light pollution and reducing these pollutions.

20

BAYRAMPAŞA 1,8 m2274.197

In the scorecard study, Bayrampaşa Municipality has achieved an average of 25% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Bayrampaşa Municipality has reached 64% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in AN-NEX-8; It is among the positive works of Bayrampa-şa Municipality to collect household electrical and electronic, tire, battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types, to inform the public about this issue, to receive licensed company support in waste management, and to control construction waste.

To become a Green Municipality; It should improve its work on asbestos control, encouraging compos-ting, reducing the use of plastic, and ensuring waste food recycling. Bayrampaşa Municipality did not show success in the title of “Transportation”. The ge-neral average of 37 district municipalities in Istan-bul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” title in ANNEX-8; It should im-prove its studies on reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles, encouraging the use of electric vehicles, and producing alternative transportation solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.

21

BEŞİKTAŞ 6,3 m2185.447

Beşiktaş warns citizens about the fight against invasive insects by conducting the detection of invasive insects in its district area and sharing what they have done with the public. In Istanbul, where endemic plants can still be found in forest lands close to the provincial borders, despite being a metropolitan city, this study of the district municipality is an example of good practice carried out against biodiversity damage.Besides, Beşiktaş Municipality has made a list of trees compatible with its ecosystem. The work is also valuable and is an example of good practice since the afforestation, according to the local ecosystem, allows the conti-nuity of living and non-living beings in the natural cycle to live in harmony.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Beşiktaş Municipality has ac-hieved an average of 43% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Beşiktaş Municipality has reached 100% success in the title of “Environmental Management”. The gene-ral average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 45%.According to the answers to the questions under the heading “Environmental Management” in AN-NEX-9; Beşiktaş Municipality supports environ-mentally friendly technologies, conducts activities that will ensure the participation of the society in environmental management, obtains Environmen-tal Management Systems certificate, cooperates with national and international environmental organiza-tions and takes place in international conventions.Beşiktaş Municipality has achieved 24% success in the title of “Land Use”.

The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 34%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Sustainable Use” subtitle in ANNEX-9; It is among the positive works of Beşiktaş Municipality to incre-ase the amount of active green areas per person and to support the applications related to food safety. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on urban agriculture practices, support for ecological agriculture, and control natural assets.According to the answers to the questions under the “Disaster Area” subtitle in the same annex, Beşiktaş Municipality should improve its work on making disaster-emergency plans, detecting earthquakes, floods, flood areas, and taking measures against the-se situations.

22

BEYKOZ 5,1 m2251.087

Beykoz Municipality is carrying out a work that is not seen in other district municipalities to recycle organic waste with compost application. The project, which started with recycling organic waste from the munici-pal dining hall using a compost machine and the reuse of the resulting compost in agricultural areas, later expanded its scope with seminars and studies in the district’s primary schools. “Green School” festivals are held throughout the district to support the management of waste generated in primary schools, especially the conversion of organic waste into compost. Beykoz Municipality sets a good example with the works such as “Compost Special Award”.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Beykoz Municipality has achie-ved an average of 32% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Beykoz Municipality has reached 69% success in the title of “Environmental Management”. The general ave-rage of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 45%.According to the answers to the questions in the “En-vironmental Management” title in ANNEX-10, Bey-koz Municipality supports environmentally friendly technologies, conducts activities that will ensure the participation of the society in environmental manage-ment, and cooperates with national and international environmental organizations. It should improve its stu-dies in obtaining Environmental Management Systems certification and becoming a party to international con-ventions. Beykoz Municipality achieved 10% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adap-tation” subtitle in ANNEX-10; It is among the positive works of Beykoz Municipality to implement practices for disasters such as floods and to share them with the public. To become a Green Municipality, aiming to re-duce the effects of the climate crisis; it should develop its studies on implementation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and climate cri-sis management plan in the public health dimension, conducting climate disaster risk analysis, reducing the effect of heat island and preparing rainwater collection pool projects.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, Beykoz Municipality’s activities to increase renewable energy use are among its positive works. It should also improve its studies on green building, carbon emission calculation, and carbon emission reduction.

23

BEYLİKDÜZÜ 9.5 m2314.662

Beylikdüzü Municipality has achieved an average success of 28% in the scorecard study as a result of scoring the indicator set.Beylikdüzü Municipality has reached 57% success in the title of “Land Use”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 34%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Sustainable Use” subtitle in ANNEX-11, Beylikdü-zü Municipality’s implementation of urban agricul-ture practices, increasing the amount of active green areas per person, and supporting applications rela-ted to food safety are among its positive works. In addition, it should improve its work on supporting ecological agriculture and controlling natural assets.According to the answers to the questions under the “Disaster Area” subtitle in the same annex; It is among the positive works of Beylikdüzü Municipa-lity to identify earthquake areas and make a disaster emergency plan. To become a Green Municipality; It should improve its work on detecting floods and taking precautions against these situations.

Beylikdüzü Municipality has achieved 10% success in the titles of “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Li-ght”. The general average of 37 district municipali-ties in Istanbul in these headings is 33%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Noise” subtitle in ANNEX-11, Beylikdüzü Muni-cipality’s activities to eliminate noise pollution are among its positive works. It should also improve its work on prohibiting the use of fireworks, taking measures against noise that may affect wildlife, and making noise regulations.According to the answers to the questions under the “Visual” subtitle in the same appendix; The activities of Beylikdüzü Municipality to eliminate visual pol-lution are among its positive activities. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on administrative sanctions for preventing visual pol-lution. In the subtitles of “Light” and “Electromag-netic”, it should strengthen its work on monitoring light and electromagnetic pollution and conducting mitigation activities.

Beylikdüzü started the Hobby Gardens project as an urban agriculture practice in Istanbul, allocating small areas to volunteer citizens by lot and encouraging people to grow vegetables and fruits in a garden close to their homes. This urban agriculture practice, which is made as an alternative to intensive supply chain mobi-lity based on feeding metropolises, is therefore an example of good practice.

Good Practice

24

BEYOĞLU 1,1 m2236.606

In the scorecard study, Beyoğlu Municipality has ac-hieved an average success of 31% as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Beyoğlu Municipality has reached 80% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-12, Beyoğlu Municipality’s activities aimed at increasing bicycle lanes, integrating pedestrian and bicycle paths into public transport, pedestrianization, and encoura-ging the use of electric vehicles are among its po-sitive activities. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve the efforts to reduce carbon emissi-ons of the vehicles.

Beyoğlu Municipality did not get any points in the title of “Energy”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 25%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-12, Be-yoğlu Municipality should improve its activities on issues such as electricity-saving, use of renewable energy, production, promotion of its production, and in-house training on the subject.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex, Beyoğlu Municipality should improve its work on thermal insulation in buildings, saving city lighting, providing in-house training on energy efficiency, and encouraging public opinion on this issue.

25

BÜYÜKÇEKMECE 1,2 m2243.474

In the scorecard study, Büyükçekmece Municipality has achieved an average of 52% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Büyükçekmece Municipality has reached 92% suc-cess in the title of “Environmental Management”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 45%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Environmental Management” title in ANNEX-13, Büyükçekmece Municipality supports environmen-tally friendly technologies, conducts activities that will ensure the participation of the society in envi-ronmental management, cooperates with national and international environmental organizations and takes place in international conventions. Besides, it should improve its efforts to obtain Environmental Management Systems certification. Büyükçekmece Municipality has achieved 5% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-13; It is among the positive works of Büyükçekmece Municipality to implement practices for disasters such as floods and to share them with the public. Aiming to reduce the effects of the climate crisis to become a Green Municipality; It should develop its studies on imple-mentation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and climate crisis management plan in public health dimension, conducting clima-te disaster risk analysis, reducing the effect of heat island and preparing rainwater collection pool pro-jects.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, Büyükçekmece Municipality’s carbon emission cal-culation is among its positive works. It should also improve its work on green buildings, reduce carbon emission, and increase renewable energy use.

26

BÜYÜKÇEKMECE 1,2 m2243.474

Büyükçekmece Municipality is implementing the “green roof” project. Büyükçekmece Municipality Parks and Gardens Directorate plants natural plants on the roofs of buildings in these areas in order not to disturb the natural green texture of parks and green areas throughout the district. The applicati-on first started in the Great Atatürk Park. This pro-ject, which will greatly contribute to the ecosystem, has been added to the report as a good example.

The Büyükçekmece Lake environment is one of the accommodation and breeding points of migratory birds. Fences surround the areas where migratory bir-ds are predominantly located around Büyükçekme-ce Lake, and measures are taken to prevent the birds from being scared. Another important protected area is Sumru Island in Büyükçekmece Lake. A separate study is carried out for the islet, which is the breeding area of tern birds. These measures taken for migratory birds are one of the best practices.

Good Practice 1

Good Practice 2

Source: URL-1, https://emlakkulisi.com/ Büyükçekmece’de “Yeşil Çatı” Uygulaması başladı! 21 Eylül 2019.

Source: URL-2, https://www.bcekmece.bel.tr/ Sumru Kuşları Koruma Altına Alındı. 21 Eylül 2019.

27

ÇATALCA 11,02 m269.057

In the scorecard study, Çatalca Municipality has ac-hieved an average of 31% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Çatalca Municipality has reached 55% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%. According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Re-cycling” subtitle in ANNEX-14; It is among the positive works of Çatalca Municipality to regu-larly conduct an inventory study regarding the amount and types of Domestic Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), to collect battery, packaging and oil wastes according to their types, to inform the public about this issue, to receive licensed company support in waste management and to conduct construction waste control. To become a Green Municipality; It should improve its work on recycling house-hold electrical and electronic waste, encourag-ing composting, reducing the use of plastic, op-erating a recycling facility, controlling asbestos, collecting waste tires, and recycling waste food.

Çatalca Municipality did not get any points in the titles of “Energy” and “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul in these headings is 25% and 24%, respectively.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-14, Çatalca Municipality should improve its work on issues such as electricity-saving, use of renewable energy, pro-duction, promotion of its production, and providing in-house training on the subject.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex; It should improve its studies on thermal insulation in buildings, saving on city lighting, providing in-hou-se training on energy efficiency, and encouraging public opinion on this issue.According to the answers to the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-14, Çatalca Municipality should improve its work on reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles, encouraging the use of electric vehicles, and producing alternative transportation solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.

28

In the scorecard study, Çekmeköy Municipality has achieved an average success of 45% as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Çekmeköy Municipality has reached 85% success in the title of “Environmental Management”. The gene-ral average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 45%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Environmental Management” title in ANNEX-15; It is among the positive works of Çekmeköy Muni-cipality to carry out activities that will ensure the participation of the society in environmental ma-nagement, to obtain Environmental Management Systems certificate, to cooperate with national and international environmental organizations and to participate in international agreements. And also; It should improve its work in supporting environmen-tally friendly technologies.

Çekmeköy Municipality has achieved 28% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 16%. According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-15; It is among the po-sitive works of Çekmeköy Municipality to make practi-ces for disasters such as floods and to share them with the public, to prepare a climate action plan and a cli-mate crisis management plan in the dimension of pub-lic health and to conduct climate disaster risk analysis. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on implementation, policy, and incentives such as heat island impact reduction and rainwater collection pool projects. According to the answers to the questi-ons under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, Çekmeköy Municipality should improve its studies on carbon emission calculation, reducing car-bon emission, increasing the use of renewable energy and green building.

ÇEKMEKÖY 1,96 m2248.859

Çekmeköy Municipality determined the plant named Blue Star that grows only in the forests of Istanbul Çekme-köy. As a result of the research that lasted for one year, the book named “Wildflowers” was prepared, which inclu-des 30 rare species and 17 natural endemic species that do not grow anywhere else in the world. These studies of Çekmeköy Municipality on biodiversity are a good example practice throughout Istanbul.

Good Practice

29

ESENLER 0,5 m2454.569

In the scorecard study, Esenler Municipality has ac-hieved an average success of 35% as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Esenler Municipality has achieved 50% success in the title of “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 33%.According to the answers to the questions under the “Noise” subtitle in ANNEX-16; Esenler Mu-nicipality’s activities to eliminate noise pollution and make noise regulations are among its positive works. It should also improve its work on prohibi-ting the use of fireworks and taking measures aga-inst noise that will affect wildlife.According to the answers to the questions in the “Visual” subtitle in the same appendix; It is among the positive activities of Esenler Municipality to eli-minate visual pollution and the implementation of administrative sanctions to prevent visual pollution.

In addition to this, in the subtitles of “Light” and “Electromagnetic”; It should improve its work on monitoring light and electromagnetic pollution and conducting mitigation activities.Esenler Municipality has achieved 20% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the “Transportati-on” heading in ANNEX-16, Esenler Municipalit-y’s planning to increase bicycle paths is among its positive works. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its studies on reducing vehicles’ carbon emissions, encouraging the use of electric vehicles, and producing alternative transportation solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.

30

ESENYURT 0,7 m2846.492

In the scorecard study, Esenyurt Municipality has achieved an average of 33% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Esenyurt Municipality has achieved 66% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-17; Esenyurt Municipality’s positive ac-tivities include collecting household electrical and electronic, tire, battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types, informing the public about this issue, getting licensed company support in was-te management, reducing the use of plastic and en-couraging composting. It should also improve its work on construction waste control, asbestos cont-rol, establishing a municipal recycling facility, and ensuring waste food recycling.Esenyurt Municipality has achieved 8% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”.

The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 16%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-17, Esenyurt Mu-nicipality’s implementation of practices for disasters such as floods and sharing them with the public are among its positive activities. To become a Green Municipality, to reduce the effects of the climate cri-sis; It should develop its studies on implementation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and climate crisis management plan in the public health dimension, conducting climate di-saster risk analysis, reducing the effect of heat island and preparing rainwater collection pool projects.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, Esenyurt Municipality should improve its studies on carbon emission calculation, reduce carbon emissi-on, and increase renewable energy use and green building.

31

EYÜPSULTAN 4,5 m2381.114

In the scorecard study, Eyüpsultan Municipality has achieved an average of 26% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Eyüpsultan Municipality has achieved 45% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-18; It is among the positive works of Eyüpsultan Municipality to collect battery, packa-ging and oil wastes according to their types, to re-ceive the support of licensed companies in waste management, to make regular inventory regarding the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE). It should also improve its work on WEEE recycling, incentives for compos-ting, construction waste, and asbestos control.

Eyüpsultan Municipality has achieved 8% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 16%. According to the answers to the qu-estions in the “Compliance” subtitle in ANNEX-18, to become a Green Municipality, Eyüpsultan Mu-nicipality should reduce the effects of the climate crisis and to share them with the public, develop its studies on implementation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and climate crisis management plan in the public health dimen-sion, conduct climate disaster risk analysis, reduce the effect of heat island and prepare rainwater col-lection pool projects. According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtit-le in the same appendix, Eyüpsultan Municipality’s ownership of a green building is among its positive works. It should also improve its studies on carbon emission calculation, reduction of carbon emission, and increasing use of renewable energy.

Eyüpsultan Municipality is practicing urban agriculture in its hobby garden with children in the “Disabled Continuing Education and Guidance Center” (ESER). Eyüpsultan’s application of this kind of urban agricul-ture is a good example.

Good Practice

32

FATİH 2,5 m2433.873

In the scorecard study, Fatih Municipality has ac-hieved an average of 52% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Fatih Municipality has achieved 80% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the Transportation title in ANNEX-19; It is among the positive works of Fatih Municipality to make appli-cations for the use of electric vehicles and to deve-lop alternative transportation solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.Fatih Municipality has achieved 5% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-19, to become a Green Municipality, Fatih Municipality should do practices to reduce the effects of the climate crisis and share them with the public. It should develop its studies on implementation, policy, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and clima-te crisis management plan in the public health di-mension. It should also conduct climate disaster risk analysis, reduce the heat island effect, and prepare rainwater collection pool projects.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, Fatih Municipality should improve its studies on carbon emission calculation, green building, redu-cing carbon emission, and increasing the use of re-newable energy.

33

GAZİOSMANPAŞA 0,8 m2497.959

In the scorecard study, Gaziosmanpaşa Municipa-lity has achieved an average success of 16% as a re-sult of scoring the indicator set.Gaziosmanpaşa Municipality has achieved 33% suc-cess in the title of “Biodiversity”. The general ave-rage of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 46%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Biodiversity” title in ANNEX-20, Gaziosmanpa-şa Municipality’s afforestation, prevention of tree destruction, and healthy plant species growth are among its positive activities. It should also improve its work on preventing damage to sensitive ecosys-tems, improving the quality of life of animals and protecting their rights, tracking and preventing in-vasive alien species, and animal ambulance.Gaziosmanpaşa Municipality could not get any po-ints in the title of “Transportation”. The general ave-rage of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%. According to the answers to the Transportation title in ANNEX-20, Gaziosmanpaşa

Municipality should improve its studies on redu-cing the carbon emissions of vehicles and applicati-ons for electric vehicles, and alternative transporta-tion solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.Gaziosmanpaşa has achieved 19% success in the tit-le of “Land Use”. The general average of 37 distri-ct municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 34%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Sustainable Use” subtitle in ANNEX-20; To beco-me a Green Municipality, Gaziosmanpaşa Munici-pality should improve its activities on increasing the amount of active green areas per capita, supporting practices related to food safety, performing urban agriculture practices, supporting ecological agricul-ture and controlling natural assets.According to the answers to the questions under the “Disaster Area” subtitle in the same annex, Gazios-manpaşa Municipality should improve its work on making disaster-emergency plans, detecting eart-hquakes, floods, flood areas, and taking measures against these situations.

34

GÜNGÖREN 0,7 m2296.967

In the scorecard study, Güngören Municipality has achieved an average of 13% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Güngören Municipality has achieved 36% success in the title of “Biodiversity”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 46%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Biodiversity” title in ANNEX-21; It is among the positive works of Güngören Municipality to affo-rest, to prevent tree destruction, healthy growth of plant species and to increase the quality of life of animals and to protect their rights. It should also improve its work on preventing damage to sensitive ecosystems, tracking and preventing invasive alien species, and animal ambulance.Güngören Municipality could not score any points in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-21, To become a Green Municipality, Güngören Municipality should improve its implementation practices to reduce the effects of the climate crisis and to share them with the public, to reduce the impact of the climate cri-sis. It should also develop its studies on implemen-tation, policies, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and climate crisis management plan in the public health dimension, conducting climate disaster risk analysis, reducing heat island effect, and preparing rainwater collection pool pro-jects.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix, Güngören Municipality should improve its studies on carbon emission calculation, green building, re-ducing carbon emission, and increasing the use of renewable energy.

35

KADIKÖY 3,15 m2541.453

Kadıköy Municipality in the EU Pre-Accession Financial Assistance Program framework, in conjunction with Turkey Europe Foundation and Kadikoy City Council has produced Sustainable Energy and Climate Adaptation Plan of Action as a part of “Kadikoy Municipality Integrative and Participatory Climate Action Project”. They stated that their aim with this plan is to reduce carbon emission by 40% by 2030. This project of Kadıköy Municipality takes its place among good examples as one of the two municipalities that make the Climate Action Plan. At the same time, Kadıköy Municipality Kemal Sunal Park has been transformed into an Ecological Life Park project. There is a Compost Training Center inside. Straw bales are used as building material. Straw bales are natural, healthy, heat performance and energy efficiency high, earthquake and fi-re-resistant, and low ecological footprint. These two applications are good examples.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Kadıköy Municipality has achieved an average of 52% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Kadıköy Municipality has achieved 93% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the Transportation title in ANNEX-22; It is among the positive works of Kadıköy Municipality to imple-ment practices for reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles and the use of electric vehicles, and to deve-lop alternative transportation solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians.Kadıköy Municipality has achieved 29% success in the title of “Energy”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 25%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in Annex-22; It is among the positive works of Kadıköy Municipality to make practices on electricity saving. It should also improve its work in areas such as renewable energy, renewable energy generation, promotion of its generation, and in-house training on the subject.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex, to become a Green Municipality, it is among the po-sitive works of Kadıköy Municipality to have heat insulation in the buildings and save on city lighting. It should also improve their work on providing in-house training on energy efficiency and promo-ting public opinion.

36

KAĞITHANE 0,9 m2442.649

In the scorecard study, Kağıthane Municipality has achieved an average of 30% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Kağıthane Municipality has achieved 46% success in the title of “Environmental Management”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Is-tanbul under this heading is 45%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Environmental Management” title in ANNEX-23; It is among the positive works of Kağıthane Munici-pality to have Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001) certificate, to have connections with national and international environmental organi-zations, and to encourage environmentally friend-ly technologies. It should also improve its work on preparing environmental status reports and colla-borating with NGOs, the public, and universities.

Kağıthane Municipality has achieved 47% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-23; It is among the positive works of Kağıt-hane Municipality to collect battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types and to receive the support of licensed companies in waste manage-ment. To become a Green Municipality, it should develop regular inventory studies on the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE) and their recycling, construction waste control, asbestos control, and waste tires.

37

KARTAL 2,8 m2463.433

In the scorecard study, Kartal Municipality has achie-ved an average of 55% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Kartal Municipality has achieved 85% success in the tit-les of “Waste” and “Environmental Management”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul in these headings is 58% and 45%, respectively.According to the answers to the questions in the “En-vironmental Management” heading in ANNEX-24; It is among the positive works of Kartal Municipality to have Environmental Management Systems (ISO 14001) certificate, to have connections with national and international environmental organizations, to pro-mote environmentally friendly technologies, to prepare an environmental status report, and to cooperate with NGOs, public and universities. It should also improve its work in fulfilling its obligations by being included in international conventions.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-24;

It is among the positive works of Kartal Municipality to collect battery, packaging, tire, and oil wastes according to their types, to receive the support of licensed com-panies in waste management, to do regularly inventory studies on the amount and types of Household Electri-cal and Electronic Waste (WEEE) and to recycle them, to control construction wastes, and to do asbestos cont-rol. It should also improve its work on incentives for composting and waste food recycling.Kartal Municipality has achieved 33% success in the tit-le of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-24; Kartal Muni-cipality’s practices for reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles and using electric vehicles are among its posi-tive works. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on producing alternative transporta-tion solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians and building condition stations for electric vehicles.

38

KARTAL 2,8 m2463.433

Kartal Municipality is implementing the MAREM Project. It conducts researches to protect the ecologi-cal balance with the MAREM project. Plankton and fauna samples were taken to determine biological di-versity based on 60 stations in the Marmara Sea. Kar-tal Municipality has conducted an excellent example project to protect the Marmara Sea’s biological diver-sity.

Kartal Municipality is also one of the partners of the R2CITIES project, which aims to increase energy ef-ficiency with new insulation and alternative energy use methods in residential areas and contribute to the national and international spread of the new model to be formed. The project, which has goals such as cost-effective solution studies to provide holistic im-provements in buildings’ energy performance at the settlement scale, shows that Kartal Municipality is es-pecially working on energy saving against the climate crisis.

Good Practice 2

Good Practice 1

Source: URL 3 URL-3, http://www.ekodenge.com/ R2CİTİES Projesi. 23 September 2019.

Source: URL-4, https://www.zerobooksonline.com/ Marem Projesi Marmara Denizi 2017 Senesi Çalışma Verileri. 23 September 2019.

39

KÜÇÜKÇEKMECE 1,1 m2770.393

In the scorecard study, Küçükçekmece Municipality has achieved an average success of 25% as a result of scoring the indicator set.Küçükçekmece Municipality has achieved 43% suc-cess in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in AN-NEX-25; It is among the positive works of Küçük-çekmece Municipality to collect battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types. It should also improve its work on the recycling of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), constru-ction waste and asbestos control, having licensed company support in waste management, incentives for composting, and waste food recycling.

Küçükçekmece Municipality did not get any points in the title of “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Li-ght”. The general average of 37 district municipali-ties in Istanbul under this heading is 33%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light” title in AN-NEX-25; To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its works on controlling and reducing this pollution.

40

MALTEPE 3,2 m2497.586

In the scorecard study, Maltepe Municipality has achieved an average of 43% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Maltepe Municipality has achieved 81% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-26; Maltepe Municipality’s positive ac-tivities include collecting battery, packaging, tire, and oil wastes according to their types, getting the support of licensed companies in waste manage-ment, recycling Household Electrical and Electro-nic Waste (WEEE), controlling construction wastes and asbestos. And also; It should improve its work on making regular inventory on the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE).

Maltepe Municipality has achieved a success rate of 13% in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul un-der this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-26; To be-come a Green Municipality, Maltepe Municipality should improve its efforts on reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles and making applications for the use of electric vehicles, producing alternative transportation solutions focused on bicycles and pedestrians, and the construction of charging stati-ons for electric vehicles.

41

PENDİK 1,7 m2698.260

In the scorecard study, Pendik Municipality has ac-hieved an average of 43% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Pendik Municipality has achieved 73% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-27; It is among the positive works of Pendik Municipality to make applications for reducing the carbon emis-sions of vehicles, to use of electric vehicles, and to produce alternative bicycle-oriented transportation solutions. And also; It should improve its efforts to produce alternative pedestrian-oriented transporta-tion solutions.Pendik Municipality has achieved 15% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.

According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-27; It is among the positive works of Pendik Municipality to do practices to reduce the effects of the climate crisis and to share them with the public. It should also develop its studies on implementation, policies, and incentives such as preparing a climate action plan and a public health-based climate crisis manage-ment plan, conducting climate disaster risk analy-sis, reducing the heat island effect, and preparing ra-inwater collection pool projects to reduce the effects of the climate crisis.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix; It is among the positive works of Pendik Munici-pality to make carbon emission calculations. To be-come a Green Municipality; It should improve its work on green buildings, reducing carbon emission, and increasing the use of renewable energy.

Pendik Municipality has established a Fully Automatic Packaging Waste Collection and Separation Facility in 2018. It was chosen as the “Low Carbon Hero” by reducing carbon emissions, one of the main causes of the climate crisis, with its recycling. Fully Automatic Packaging Waste Collection and Separation Facility has taken its place among good practice examples.

Good Practice

42

SANCAKTEPE 0,7 m2402.391

In the scorecard study, Sancaktepe Municipality has achieved an average of 23% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Sancaktepe Municipality has achieved 42% success in the title of “Biodiversity”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 46%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Biodiversity” title in ANNEX-28, Sancaktepe Mu-nicipality’s positive activities include preventing damage to sensitive ecosystems, afforestation, tree destruction, and healthy growth of plant species. It should also improve its work on tracking and pre-venting invasive alien species, improving animals’ quality of life, and protecting their rights.

Sancaktepe Municipality has achieved 12% success in the title of “Energy”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 25%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-28; San-caktepe Municipality should improve its work on issues such as electricity-saving, generation and use of renewable energy, encouragement of its generati-on, and in-house training on the subject.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex; It is among the positive works of Sancaktepe Mu-nicipality to save on heat insulation and city ligh-ting in buildings. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on providing in-house training on energy efficiency and promoting public opinion.

43

SARIYER 6,7 m2344.876

In the scorecard study, Sarıyer Municipality has ac-hieved an average success of 34% as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Sarıyer Municipality achieved 62% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 distri-ct municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-29; It is among the positive works of Sa-rıyer Municipality to collect battery, packaging, tire and oil wastes according to their types, to receive the support of licensed companies in waste mana-gement, and to recycle Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE).

It should also improve its work on creating a regular inventory on the amount and types of WEEE, cont-rol of construction waste and asbestos, incentives for composting, waste food recycling, and in-house training on waste.Sarıyer Municipality has achieved 7% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%. According to the answers to the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-29, Sarıyer Municipality should improve its efforts to reduce vehicles’ carbon emissions and develop alternative transportation solutions focused on electric vehic-les, bicycles, and pedestrians to become a Green Municipality.

44

SİLİVRİ 1,4 m2180.524

The Municipality of Silivri establishes an Agricultural Production and Research Center (TÜRAM) within the district’s boundaries and conducts studies on the cultivation of alternative plant varieties suitable for the traditional agriculture and regional conditions in the region. The project, which is a good example in terms of strengthening urban agriculture and the farmers in the region, supports the cultivation of plants compatible with the region’s soil. At the same time, it has implemented the Soil, Plant and Water Analysis Laboratory project together with the Silivri Chamber of Agriculture and supports the farmers in the region with the analysis and research it has done. Another good example realized by the Municipality of Silivri is that it puts smart benches working with solar energy at the point where people’s density is high on the coastal promena-de. Through these banks, it is possible to charge electronic items with solar energy to be available to citizens.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Silivri Municipality has ac-hieved an average of 32% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Silivri Municipality has achieved 68% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in AN-NEX-30; It is among the positive works of Silivri Municipality to collect battery, packaging, tire and oil wastes according to their types, to receive the support of licensed companies in waste manage-ment and to recycle Household Electrical and Ele-ctronic Waste (WEEE). It should also improve its work on creating a regular inventory on the amount

and types of WEEE, control of construction waste and asbestos, incentives for composting, waste food recycling, and in-house training on waste.Silivri Municipality did not get any points in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-30; To beco-me a Green Municipality of Silivri Municipality, it should improve its studies on reducing the carbon emissions of vehicles and developing alternative transportation solutions focused on electric vehic-les, bicycle, and pedestrians.

45

SULTANBEYLİ 0,7 m2329.985

In the scorecard study, Sultanbeyli Municipality has achieved an average success of 25% as a result of scoring the indicator set.Sultanbeyli Municipality has achieved 64% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-31; It is among the positive works of Sul-tanbeyli Municipality to collect battery, packaging, tire and oil wastes according to their types, to re-ceive the support of licensed companies in waste management, and to control construction wastes. It should also improve its work on reducing the use of plastics, asbestos control, establishing a regular inventory on the amount and types of Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), and recyc-ling.

Sultanbeyli Municipality could not score any points in the “Energy” title. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 25%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-31; Sultan-beyli Municipality should improve its work on issu-es such as electricity-saving, generation and use of renewable energy, encouragement of its generation, and in-house training on the subject.According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex; In order for Sultanbeyli Municipality to become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on thermal insulation in buildings, saving from city li-ghting, providing in-house training on energy effi-ciency and encouraging public opinion.

46

SULTANGAZİ 2,1 m2528.514

In the scorecard study, Sultangazi Municipality has achieved an average of 28% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Sultangazi Municipality has achieved 57% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this hea-ding is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-32; It is among the positive works of Sul-tangazi Municipality to collect battery, packaging, and oil wastes according to their types, to reduce the use of plastic, to implement incentives for compos-ting, to regularly create an inventory regarding the amount and types of Domestic Electrical and Ele-ctronic Waste (WEEE) and to control construction wastes.

It should also improve its work on asbestos control, WEEE, and recycling of waste food.Sultangazi Municipality has achieved 7% success in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this he-ading is 24%.According to the answers to the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-32; Sultangazi Municipality should improve its efforts to reduce vehicles’ carbon emissions and develop alternative transportation solutions focused on electric vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians to become a Green Municipality.

47

ŞİŞLİ 0,3 m2274.196

In the scorecard study, Şişli Municipality has achie-ved an average of 32% success as a result of scoring the indicator set.Şişli Municipality has achieved 68% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 distri-ct municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-33; Şişli Municipality’s positive activities include collecting battery, packaging, tire, and oil wastes according to their types, applying incentives for composting, recycling Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), and controlling constru-ction wastes and asbestos. And also; It should im-prove its work on the recycling of waste food.Şişli Municipality achieved a success rate of 13% un-der the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-33; Şişli Muni-cipality’s practices for disasters such as floods and sharing them with the public are among its positive activities.

It should also develop its studies on implementati-on, policies, and incentives such as preparing clima-te action plan and public health-based climate crisis management plan, conducting climate disaster risk analysis, reducing the heat island effect, and pre-paring rainwater collection pool projects to reduce the effects of the climate crisis. In the “Impact Mi-tigation” subtitle in the same annex; Determining the carbon emission reduction target of Şişli Muni-cipality is among its positive works. But; It should improve its studies on carbon emission calculation and reduction, green building, and increasing the use of renewable energy.Şişli Municipality has achieved a success rate of 13% in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-33; Making a plan to increase bicycle lanes is among its positive studies. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on reducing vehicles’ carbon emissions and developing alternative transportati-on solutions focused on the use of electric vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.

48

TUZLA 2,7 m2252.923

In the scorecard study, Tuzla Municipality has ac-hieved an average of 40% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Tuzla Municipality has achieved 76% success in the title of “Energy”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 25%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Renewable Energy” subtitle in ANNEX-34; Tuz-la Municipality’s positive activities include elect-ricity saving practices, renewable energy use and generation, and encouragement of its generation. It should also improve its work on issues such as in-house training on renewable energy. According to the answers to the questions under the “Energy Efficiency” subtitle in the same annex; It is among the positive works of Tuzla Municipality to make thermal insulation in buildings and saving from city lighting.

Tuzla Municipality has achieved 19% success in the title of “Land Use”. The general average of 37 distri-ct municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 34%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Sustainable Use” subtitle in ANNEX-34; It is among the positive works of Tuzla Municipality to increase the amount of active green areas per person and to support applications related to food safety. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on urban agriculture practices, support for ecological agriculture, and control natural assets. According to the answers to the questions under the “Disaster Area” subtitle in the same annex, Tuz-la Municipality should improve its work on disas-ter-emergency planning, detecting earthquakes, flo-ods, and taking precautions against these situations.

Tuzla is the only municipality in Istanbul that operates a renewable power plant. With the solar energy panels installed on the Şelale Kültür Merkezi roof, it provides the energy of the cultural center in a renewable way, transferring it to the electric vehicle charging station and using it in different areas. It provides energy savings and strengthens the local by producing its own energy. It also controlled the filling rates by inserting chips into the garbage containers. Collecting filling information in the central system has prevented the vehicles that go out to collect garbage from making unnecessary tours in places where the garbage is not fully loaded. This practice saves energy and money by reducing carbon emissions and air pollution. They are good practice examples of Tuzla with solar power plant and microchip container projects.

Good Practice

49

ÜMRANİYE 1,2 m2699.901

In the scorecard study, Ümraniye Municipality has achieved an average of 35% success as a result of sco-ring the indicator set.Ümraniye Municipality has achieved 68% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in AN-NEX-35; It is among the positive works of Ümraniye Municipality to collect battery, packaging, tire and oil wastes according to their types, to receive the sup-port of licensed companies in waste management, to recycle Household Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), to control construction waste and asbestos. It should also improve its work on making a regular inventory of WEEE amount and types, encouraging composting and recycling waste food.It has achieved 10% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipali-ties in Istanbul under this title is 16%.

To become a Green Municipality, it should impro-ve its studies on determining the carbon emission reduction target, calculating carbon emission, redu-cing carbon emissions, and increasing green building and renewable energy use. According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in AN-NEX-35; Implementing practices for disasters such as floods and sharing them with the public are among its positive activities. It should also develop its studies on implementation, policies, and incentives such as preparing climate action plans and public health-ba-sed climate crisis management plans, conducting cli-mate disaster risk analysis, reducing the heat island effect, and preparing rainwater collection pool proje-cts to reduce the effects of the climate crisis.According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix; To become a Green Municipality, it should impro-ve its studies on determining the target of carbon emission reduction, calculating and reducing carbon emission, increasing green building, and renewable energy use.

Ümraniye Municipality is working on Ümraniye Çiğdemi, an endemic plant species. This study aimed at identifying the endemic species, and protecting the ecosystem is an important issue for the title of “Biodiver-sity”. For this reason, Ümraniye Çiğdemi Research, Education and Protection Center, which was opened by Ümraniye Municipality considering its endemic species, has taken its place among the best examples.

Good Practice

50

ÜSKÜDAR 1,9 m2533.570

It has opened its own Recycling Facility within the Waste Management Center of Istanbul Metropolitan Mu-nicipality. Recycling is essential in adapting to the climate crisis. Therefore, the Waste Management Center project takes its place among good examples. At the same time, urban agriculture practice is carried out in the planting area designated as a garden and ready for planting within the scope of Üsküdar Municipality’s Kuzguncuk Garden Project. Kuzguncuk Garden has taken its place as a good example in hobby gardening with its playgrounds, garden irrigation area, orchard, and agricultural fields.

Good Practice

In the scorecard study, Üsküdar Municipality has achieved an average success of 41% as a result of scoring the indicator set.Üsküdar Municipality has achieved 70% success in the title of “Waste”. The general average of 37 dist-rict municipalities in Istanbul under this heading is 58%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Waste Management and Recycling” subtitle in ANNEX-36; It is among the positive works of Üskü-dar Municipality to collect battery, packaging, tire and oil wastes according to their types, to make re-gular inventory regarding the amount and types of Domestic Electrical and Electronic Waste (WEEE), to control construction wastes and asbestos.

It should also improve its work on WEEE recycling, incentives for composting, receiving support from licensed companies in waste management, and re-cycling of waste food.Üsküdar Municipality has achieved a success rate of 13% in the title of “Transportation”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul un-der this heading is 24%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Transportation” heading in ANNEX-36; It is among the positive works of Üsküdar Municipality to make a plan to increase bicycle roads. To become a Green Municipality, it should improve its work on reducing vehicles’ carbon emissions and deve-loping alternative transportation solutions focused on using electric vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians.

51

ZEYTİNBURNU 3,6 m2287.378

In the scorecard study, Zeytinburnu Municipality has achieved an average success of 42% as a result of scoring the indicator set.Zeytinburnu Municipality has achieved 78% suc-cess in the title of “Land Use”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 34%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Sustainable Use” subtitle in ANNEX-37; Its posi-tive works include urban agriculture practices, sup-porting ecological agriculture, controlling natural assets, increasing the amount of active green areas per person, and supporting practices related to food security. According to the answers to the questions under the “Disaster Area” subtitle in the same an-nex; Taking measures against existing flood areas, detecting earthquakes, and sharing them with the public are among its positive works. It should also improve its work on disaster-contingency planning, detecting floods, flood areas, and taking precautions against these situations.

Zeytinburnu Municipality has achieved 3% success in the title of “Climate Crisis”. The general average of 37 district municipalities in Istanbul under this title is 16%.According to the answers to the questions in the “Adaptation” subtitle in ANNEX-37; Zeytinburnu Belediyesi should develop its studies to reduce the effects of the climate crisis by preparing a climate action plan and public health-based climate crisis management plan. It should also carry out disas-ters such as floods, conduct climate disaster risk analysis, reduce the effect of heat island, and pre-pare rainwater collection pool projects. According to the answers to the questions under the “Impact Mitigation” subtitle in the same appendix; To beco-me a Green Municipality, it should also improve its studies on determining the target of carbon emis-sion reduction, calculating and reducing carbon emission, increasing the use of green buildings and renewable energy.

Zeytinburnu Municipality conducts activities to increase and encourage bicycles in the district with the pro-ject initiated to increase the use of bicycles. The project, which started with the use of bicycles by the mayor and the municipal staff, became widespread throughout the district with the organization of weekly bicycle tours and the “ZEYBİS” project. This project is a good practice in reducing the traffic density and fossil fuel consumption caused by motor vehicles within the district’s boundaries.

Good Practice

52

COASTAL REPORT

53

MAP: Map of districts on the coast of Istanbul

23 of 39 districts of Istanbul have seafront. Since two of these districts’ population is below 50,000, there is no obligation to publish a strategic plan or activity report. For this reason, Adalar and Şile districts are not included in the scope of the project. The total population of 21 of the remaining 37 municipalities is 7,540,232 people. This shows us that 50% of the population of Istanbul lives in municipalities on the coast. However, in the light of the data collected, it is seen that 9 out of 21 municipalities did not give a positive answer to any of the nine questions un-der the “Coastal Title”. The general average of the municipalities in the title is 28%. Eight municipali-ties work on coastal pollution. The number of mu-nicipalities with public beaches is 11. The number of municipalities that regularly clean the coasts and beaches is 7.

The number of municipalities conducting/organi-zing empowerment training for local coastal and beach cleaning is only one. Again, there is only one municipality that responds positively to all questi-ons; it is Büyükçekmece Municipality. The impor-tance of especially local empowerment training is obvious according to the population ratio. District municipalities carry out the coastal line cleaning jo-intly with the Metropolitan Municipality or assign all the responsibility to the Metropolitan Munici-pality. However, district municipalities have a great responsibility in matters such as local empower-ment. They must focus on their own coasts’ clean-liness, especially when considering a metropolis’s water ecosystems like Istanbul. Districts that have coasts to the Bosphorus should take precautions against permanent floods that may occur on the co-asts by collaborating with the Ministry of Environ-ment and IMM.

Regulation of Directives for the Implementation of Coastal Law:

Article 18: Municipalities provide coastline cleaning,Article 19: Coastal structuring is under the control of the municipalities.

54

RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

According to Article 15a of the 5393 Municipal Law, “The municipality takes all kinds of activities and ini-tiatives to meet the residents’ local common needs.” According to this law, district municipalities should also intervene in the duties and jurisdictions of the Ministry of Environment, İSKİ, and the Metropo-litan Municipality in line with the interests of their local, even if they are not in the area of duty and ju-risdiction according to the legislation.Municipalities should take into account the benefits of nature and society rather than economic costs. Du-ring the screening of 37 district municipalities, it was observed that there were projects in strategic plans in accordance with green municipality criteria, and structures were established in this regard. However, the projects were not implemented due to reasons such as legislation, budget problems, or changes in the agenda. For example; Construction works were carried out to start some of the projects in the strate-gic plan of Beşiktaş Municipality, but they were not implemented. Beykoz Municipality has determined the heat islands seen due to urbanization but did not carry out the heat island impact reduction studies. The early warning system project of Bağcılar Munici-pality has been included in the strategic plan but has not been implemented.

Generally, 37 district municipalities do not do any work on wastewater, gray water, and water treatment since they are in the field of duty of ISKI. The im-portance of surface and groundwater should mobi-lize district municipalities to save water, and forums should be made on local empowerment training and gray-water reuse. It is vital to use gray water and water resources and reduce the damage to nature in const-ruction and new water transport channels.Municipalities should carry out mitigation and adap-tation studies against the climate crisis and should be supervised by their work. It should not be forgotten that municipalities will be the first organization to apply in disasters that may be experienced due to the climate crisis. Activities to be carried out in this re-gard are generally left to a higher institution’s respon-sibility, as they are out of legislation in municipalities. However, the various disruptions experienced in the 5.8 magnitude earthquake in Istanbul on September 26, 2019, once again showed that the citizens first applied to the district municipalities. The responsibi-lity of the district municipalities is enormous but not impossible.Considering that Istanbul is a metropolis of 17 milli-on people, the disaster action plan must be accessible

55

clean, renewable energy applications.Municipalities have generally transferred the studies on Noise-Visual-Electromagnetic-Light pollution to the Metropolitan Municipality due to the legislati-on. There is no work other than auditing in district municipalities. However, it can take preventive me-asures against dust, noise, light, and electromagnetic pollution that affect natural life and impose sanctions on pollutants that emit radiation that harms human and environmental life.The most critical work to be done on waste is to prevent waste generation. In this sense, it is vital for the district municipalities to regularly inspect 1st, 2nd, and 3rd class waste producers, reduce the use of plastic, collect the garbage by sorting, and make compost. Waste separation enables the municipality to process waste more easily in the formation-de-composition-disposal processes and facilitate recyc-ling, thus reducing carbon emissions and saving raw materials. Therefore, it is important and necessary to carry out waste generation prevention activities. Due to the formation of different types of waste such as food, technology, and textile products in places such as OIZs and shopping malls, district municipalities should cooperate with workplaces to carry out was-te prevention and separation activities and carefully follow their work.The highest rate that the district municipalities exa-mined during the Green Municipal Scorecard gave positive answers to the green municipality indicator questions is 55%. For this reason, it is suggested that district municipalities immediately start working to become Green Municipalities to improve the quality of life.

from online and offline applications, especially in districts such as Beşiktaş, Kadıköy, Beyoğlu, and Fatih, where the difference between day and night population is high. Exercises should be carried out depending on the disaster action plan, first in the workplace. The inadequacy of the gathering areas in terms of quantity and quality is seen in studies con-ducted by AFAD. Apart from this, there is no rese-arch on what can be done in case of a water shortage in districts such as Şişli, Bağcılar, and Esenyurt with high population density.Few municipalities work on carbon emissions. In general, targets for reducing carbon emissions have been announced, but carbon emission calculation and carbon footprint measurements have not been made. Carbon emission is one of the biggest causes of the climate crisis as it causes the greenhouse gas effe-ct. For this reason, efforts to reduce carbon emissions are one of the essential steps to be taken against the climate crisis and air pollution. Although it is not inc-luded in the legislation of district municipalities, dist-rict municipalities should encourage activities related to bicycle paths and public transportation. There are studies carried out by Zeytinburnu Municipality re-garding this issue. Municipalities also do not work on the integration of bicycle lanes into public transport. Bakırköy Municipality built a bicycle path on Aksu Street and Ekrem Kurt Boulevard located next to the Veli Efendi Hippodrome, but this road remained idle because it was not integrated with public transporta-tion and the main artery roads. Municipalities must take the necessary steps for bicycle paths, as it will reduce air pollution and reduce carbon emissions in districts with small and densely populated bounda-ries that are not possible to build new roads.Urban agriculture is important for increasing food accessibility and food independence. The supply cha-in, established to feed the metropolis, is one of the main reasons that increase carbon emissions. Most of the foodstuffs transported by land are destroyed on long roads, and industrial farming methods are used to make the food more durable. In this case, carbon emissions increase, and human health is at risk. Mu-nicipalities should encourage urban agriculture and work to reduce food transport.Cleaning the air from toxic gases is vital for quality of life. It is very important to save energy, to establish solar power plants, to carry out inspections, training, and encouraging studies. When 37 districts are exa-mined, it is seen that only Tuzla Municipality has ins-talled solar energy panels in the Şelale Kültür Merke-zi. This study is extremely important as it is one of the

56

Green Municipal Scorecard District General Success Chart

57

EPILOGUEYou may just bring to mind the news of 2019, and it can even be enough actually: rains that paralyze major cities in ten minutes, floods terrifying with loss of life and property in the Black Sea, the endless forest fires that smoke Izmir and its surroundings for weeks... Of course, Turkey’s problems are not li-mited to but to say that it very seriously in trouble with the climate crisis is not very difficult.Turkey, which cannot get out of the development cycle seeing the ecosystem as only a source and ba-sed on fossil fuels that cause the Climate Crisis, is faced with the consequences of this in different di-mensions both in urban and rural areas. It seems that it will continue to remain increasingly violent.It seems that Turkey has to follow a path generally extending from private due to the lack of a master plan against the climate crisis and adaptation plan regarding agriculture and urban dimension. At this point, the importance and weight of local govern-ments naturally increase.The interesting thing is that while many national governments worldwide take hesitant steps about the climate crisis and sustainability studies in ge-neral, and while they linger with policies that lack integrity, we are witnessing much clearer and more consistent steps from local governments. Especially in post-Trump USA, it is noteworthy that cities and states develop policies that are diametrically oppo-sed to the central government in climate change and sustainability steps. The same process is happening in many countries at different levels. There are seri-ous debates on the possibilities of solving sustainab-le development problems by local policies in Turkey and the world. One of the most obvious signs of this has emerged recently at the C40 World Mayors Summit in Co-penhagen. At the United Nations Climate Action Summit in New York in September, while the na-tional leaders of dozens of countries saw almost no further steps on the climate crisis, the mayors of the world’s largest cities, who joined the C40, announ-ced that they officially recognized the global climate emergency.

The newly elected C40 President, Los Angeles Ma-yor Eric Garcetti, and the mayors of cities such as Copenhagen, Paris, Rio de Janeiro, Sydney, and Tokyo renewed their commitment to keeping glo-bal warming below the 1.5-degree target of the Paris Agreement by protecting the environment, strengt-hening the economy, and building a fairer future by reducing emissions from transport, industry, buil-dings, and waste which are the sectors most respon-sible for the climate crisis.A similar development is actually happening in Turkey. There is a significant movement in the mu-nicipalities to go beyond the current national deve-lopment policies.At this point, it becomes increasingly important to know where our local governments are in the economic, social, and environmental processes of sustainable development. It’s cliché, but “you can’t manage without measuring” it really is. The most important way to see the concrete situation is to de-termine the correct and healthy measurement met-hods, that is, the indicator sets.These precursors lie in the background of the Gre-en City Scorecard Project and Report prepared by the Green Future Association that you hold in your hands. If we can see the concrete situation and find concrete analyzes, it will be much more possible for us to make progress in this area in the upcoming period.Life seems to take us on a participatory and democ-ratic sustainable development journey that progres-ses from the locals, knitted by knot. We hope that the Green Report study will be one of the first but important steps in this long and challenging road without a master plan.

EKOIQ and iklimhaber.org Editor in Chief Barış Doğru

58

• 37 Vehicle Law. (1961) T.R. Official Gazette, 10705, 12 January 1961.• 2872 Environment Law art.12-15-20. (2006). T.R. Official Gazette, 18132, 26 April 2006.• 2960 Bosphorus Law. (1983). T.R. Official Gazette, 18229, 22 November 1983.• 3194 Development Law. (1985). T.R. Official Gazette, 18749, 9 May 1985.• 4734 Public Procurement Law. (2002). T.R. Official Gazette, 24648, 22 January 2002.• 5216 Metropolitan Municipality Law. (2004). T.R. Official Gazette, 25531, 10 July 2004.• 5302 Special Provincial Administration Law. (2005). T.R. Official Gazette, 25745, 4 March 2005.• 5393 Municipal Revenue Law. (1981) T.R. Official Gazette, 17354, 29 October 1981.• 5403 Soil Conservation and Land Use Law. (2005). T.R. Official Gazette, 25880, 3 July 2005.• 5737 Foundation Law. (2008). T.R. Official Gazette, 26800, 27 February 2008.• 5944 2010 Central Government Budget Law. (2009). T.R. Official Gazette, 27449, 31 December 2009.• 6245 Travel Allowance Law. (1954). T.R. Official Gazette, 8637, 18 February 1954.• 6292 Law on Supporting the Development of Forest Villagers and Assessment of Land Excavated Outside the

Forestry in the Name of the Treasury and the Sale of Agricultural Lands Belonging to the Treasury. (2012). T.R. Official Gazette, 28275, 26 April 2012.

• 6831 Forest Law. (1956). T.R. Official Gazette, 9402, 8 September 1956.• 7121 Coastal Law m.18. (1992). T.R. Official Gazette, 21374, 13 October 1992.• 7th EAP priority objectives. (2019, 7 August). Retrieved on 31 August 2019 from the European Commission Web-

site: https://ec.europa.eu• Akpınar, P., Odabaş G., Sayman Ü. & Tohumcu T. (2015-2016). Developing the institutional capacity for environ-

mental management project in Turkey (checkup): environmental management and training presentations and meeting notes for municipalities. Regional Environmental Center.

• Akpulat, O. & Sayman, Ü. (2015). Regulation on control of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Regional Environmental Center.

• Akpulat, O. & Sayman, Ü. (2016). Regulation on packaging waste control municipal implementation guide. Re-gional Environmental Center.

• Akpulat, O., Sayman, Ü. & Şakı, Ö. (2016). Regulation on the control of waste batteries and accumulators munici-pal implementation guide. Regional Environmental Center.

• Alan, Ç. & Güven, A. (2016). The role of local governments in solving urban and environmental problems. Inter-national Water and Environment Congress SUÇEV. Bursa.

• Argüden, Y. (2018). The municipality report card of the districts of Istanbul with a view to the citizen. Istanbul: Argüden governance academy publications.

• Arıkan, Y. & Özsoy, G. (2008). Climate change bedside guide from A to Z. Regional Environmental Center.• European Environment Agency. (2016, 30 September). Transport and ecosystems. Retrieved on 21 July, 2019 from

European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2017, 25 September). Are we heading for the electric future? Retrieved on 21 July,

2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2017, 25 September). Energy and climate change. Retrieved on 21 July, 2019

from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2017, 25 September). To provide clean, renewable energy 25.09.2017. Retrieved

on 21 July, 2019 from European Environment Agency Web Site: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2018, 20 November). Water use, quantity, and quality face major challenges in

Europe. Retrieved on 20 July 2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2018, 20 November). Close up - an ocean of plastic. Retrieved on 20 July 2019

from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2018, 20 November). Close inspection-water in the city. Retrieved on 20 July

2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• European Environment Agency. (2019, 25 September). Shaping the future of energy in Europe: Clean, smart, and

renewable. Retrieved on 21 July 2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• Bakas, I. (2019, 26 June). In tackling the plastic waste crisis, prevention is crucial. Retrieved on 15 July 2019 from

European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• Batal, S. & Kızılboğa, R. (2012). The role and importance of local government in solving environmental problems

in Turkey. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 191-212.• Batten, J. (2016). Sustainable cities index. Access address: https://www.arcadis.com/• Mayors climate agreement and mayors agreement converge. Retrieved on 27 July 2019, from http://uclg-mewa.

org/.• Municipal Council Working Regulations. (2005). T.R. Official Gazette, 25961, 9 October 2005.• Municipal Police Regulations. (2007). T.R. Official Gazette, 26490, 11 April 2007.• General Regulation on Production, Allocation, Lease and Sale of Lands, Houses, and Workplaces by Municipali-

ties. (2005). T.C Official Gazette, 25951, 29 October 2005.• Thermal Insulation Regulation in Buildings. (2000). T.R. Official Gazette, 24043, 8 May 2000.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

59

• Boğaziçi University Economics and Econometrics. (2011). The cities of sustainability research in Turkey. Istanbul: Boğaziçi University.

• Bruyninckx, H. (2018, 20 November). Editorial - clean water is life, health, food, leisure and energy ... Retrieved on 20 July, 2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu

• Bruyninckx, H. (2018, 29 January). Clean Air; It provides benefits for human health and climate change. Retrieved on 20 July, 2019 from European Environment Agency: https://www.eea.europa.eu

• Cities & climate change infographics. Retrieved on 27 July 2019, from Urbarnet Website: https://www.urbanet.info/.• Cities. Retrieved on 31 August 2019 from the European Commission Website: https://ec.europa.eu• Climate change. Retrieved on 29 July 2019, from UN-Habitat Website: https://new.unhabitat.org/.• Çağlar, F. (2005). Local environmental action programs implementation guide. Regional Environmental Center.• Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation. (2003). T.R. Official Gazette, 25318, 16 December 2003.• Demirci, M. (2015). Urban climate change governance. Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administra-

tive Sciences Journal, 75-100. Environment action program to 2020. (2019, 7 August). Retrieved on 31 August 2019 from the European Commission Website: https://ec.europa.eu E.U. policy on the urban environment-overview. (2019, 7 August). Retrieved on 31 August 2019 from the European Commission Website: https://ec.europa.eu

• European Commission. (2018). European Green Capital Award 2021 Guidance Note.• European Commission. (2019). Eu research and innovation for cities of the future. Brussels.• European Commission. (2015). Indicators for sustainable cities.• Gezerler, Ö. & Shirlak E. (2010). Good practice examples from the European Union in the field of environment.

Regional Environmental Center.• Gül, Z., Karakaş, Ö., Paydaş, E. & Yıldırım M. (2010). European Union environmental legislation publications.

Regional Environmental Center.• Air Quality Assessment and Management Regulation. (2008). T.R. Official Gazette, 26898, 6 June 2008.• Climate change and carbon. Retrieved on 28 August 2019 from Boğaziçi University Climate Change and Policies

Application and Research Center Website: http://climatechange.boun.edu.tr• Climate change adaptation time: Do local governments in Turkey ready? (2019, February). Retrieved on 27 July

2019, from Iklim News Web Site: https://www.iklimhaber.org/.• Law on Istanbul 2010 European Capital of Culture. (2007). T.R. Official Gazette, 26700, 14 November 2007.• Istanbul Provincial Directorate of Environment and Urbanization Environmental Impact Assessment Branch

(2018). Istanbul province 2017 environmental status report. Istanbul.• Regulation on Procedures and Principles Regarding Strategic Planning in Public Administrations. (2006). T.R. Of-

ficial Gazette, 26179, 26 May 2006.• Carbon footprint. Retrieved on 28 August 2019 from Boğaziçi University Climate Change and Policies Application

and Research Center Website: http://climatechange.boun.edu.tr• Kazmierczak, A. (2019, 20 March). How do environmental hazards affect vulnerable groups in Europe? Retrieved

on 20 July, 2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• Kearney, A. (2014). Global cities, present and future.• Kerman U., Altan Y., Aktel M. & Öztop, S. (2012). Strategic planning in municipalities: example of Aegean Region

provincial municipalities. Süleyman Demirel University Economics and Administrative Sciences, 1-15.• Chemical pollution. Retrieved on 28 August 2019 from Boğaziçi University Climate Change and Policies Applica-

tion and Research Center Website: http://climatechange.boun.edu.tr• Langer, H. & Shields K. (2009). European green city index. Munich: Siemens AG.• Local Governments for Sustainability. (2016). The Paris climate package: a basic guide for local and subnational

governments. Paris.• OECD Green Growth Studies. (2013). Green growth in cities. Paris: OECD Publishing.• Regulation on Permits to be Given in Areas Considered Forest (2007). T.R. Official Gazette, 26470, 22 March 2007.• Ortiz, A. G. (2017, 2 February). Air quality remains a hot topic for many Europeans. Retrieved on 21 July, 2019 from

European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• What is the Ozone Layer? Retrieved on 28 August 2019 from Boğaziçi University Climate Change and Policies

Application and Research Center Website: http://climatechange.boun.edu.tr• What is the greenhouse effect? Retrieved on 28 August 2019 from Boğaziçi University Climate Change and Policies

Application and Research Center Web Site: http://climatechange.boun.edu.tr 20 February 2010.• TMMOB Chamber of Environmental Engineers. (2019). World environment day report on Turkey. Istanbul.• Public Administration Institute for Turkey and the Middle East Center for Local Government Regulation. (2010).

T.R. Official Gazette, 27499,• Sporer, M. (2018, 29 January). Tracking Europe’s progress in meeting the 2020 climate and energy targets. Retrieved

on 20 July 2019 from European Environment Agency Website: https://www.eea.europa.eu• Regulation on Working Procedures and Principles of Strategy Development Units. (2006). T.R. Official Gazette,

26084• United Nations Statistical Commission. (2017). Global indicator framework for the Sustainable Development Goals

and targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN Resolution A / RES / 71/313 (https://unstats.un.org/).

• Worldwide, M., & University, B. (2011). Turkey’s Cities Sustainability Research, Istanbul 2011

60

ANNEX-1

ARNAVUTKÖY

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNOYESNOYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNOYES

YESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

61

ANNEX-1

ARNAVUTKÖY

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONOYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESNONONONONOYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONOYESNONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

62

ANNEX-2

ATAŞEHİR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NOYESNONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

63

ANNEX-2

ATAŞEHİR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONOYESNONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

64

ANNEX-3

AVCILAR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESNONONOYESYESYESNOYESNONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

65

ANNEX-3

AVCILAR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESNONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNOYESNOYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

66

ANNEX-4

BAĞCILAR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESNONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONONOYESNONO

NONONOYESNONONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

ANNEX-4

BAĞCILAR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

ANNEX-5BAHÇELİEVLER

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONOYESNONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

ANNEX-5

BAHÇELİEVLER

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONOYESNOYESYESYESNOYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

ANNEX-6

BAKIRKÖY

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

ANNEX-6

BAKIRKÖY

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

NONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

ANNEX-7

BAŞAKŞEHİR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONOYES

YESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

ANNEX-7

BAŞAKŞEHİR

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

74

ANNEX-8

BAYRAMPAŞA

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

75

ANNEX-8

BAYRAMPAŞA

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

76

ANNEX-9

BEŞİKTAŞ

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONOYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONOYESNONOYESNOYES

NOYESNOYESNONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

77

ANNEX-9

BEŞİKTAŞ

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

YESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYES

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

YESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESNONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

78

ANNEX-10

BEYKOZ

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONOYESYESYESNONOYESNONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONOYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

79

ANNEX-10

BEYKOZ

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

NONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONOYESNONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

80

BEYLİKDÜZÜ

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-11

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESNONOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

81

BEYLİKDÜZÜ

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-11

YESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONOYESNONONONONOYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

82

BEYOĞLU

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-12

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

83

BEYOĞLU

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-12

YESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNONONOYESNONONONOYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

84

BÜYÜKÇEKMECE

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-13

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONOYESYES

YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

85

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-13

BÜYÜKÇEKMECE

YESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONOYESNONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

86

ÇATALCA

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-14

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESNONOYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

87

ÇATALCA

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-14

YESYESNOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONOYESNONOYESYESNOYESNOYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONOYESNONOYESNONOYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

88

ÇEKMEKÖY

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-15

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

NOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

89

ÇEKMEKÖY

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-15

YESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

90

ESENLER

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-16

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONOYESNONONOYESYESNONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

91

ESENLER

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-16

YESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONOYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNOYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNOYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

92

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ESENYURT

ANNEX-17

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONOYESNONONOYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESNO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

93

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ESENYURT

ANNEX-17

YESYESNOYESNOYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONOYESNONOYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

94

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

EYÜPSULTAN

ANNEX-18

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESNOYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNO

NONONOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

95

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

EYÜPSULTAN

ANNEX-18

YESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESNONONONONOYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

96

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

FATİH

ANNEX-19

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

97

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

FATİH

ANNEX-19

YESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONOYESNOYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

98

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

GAZİOSMANPAŞA

ANNEX-20

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

99

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

GAZİOSMANPAŞA

ANNEX-20

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESNONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

100

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

GÜNGÖREN

ANNEX-21

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONOYESNONONOYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

101

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

GÜNGÖREN

ANNEX-21

YESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

102

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KADIKÖY

ANNEX-22

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYES

NOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONOYESNONO

NONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

103

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KADIKÖY

ANNEX-22

YESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

104

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KAĞITHANE

ANNEX-23

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESNOYES

YESNONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

105

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KAĞITHANE

ANNEX-23

YESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

106

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KARTAL

ANNEX-24

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYES

YESNONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

107

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KARTAL

ANNEX-24

YESYESYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

108

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

KÜÇÜKÇEKMECE

ANNEX-25

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNONOYESNONONOYES

YESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

109

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-25

KÜÇÜKÇEKMECE

YESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

110

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

MALTEPE

ANNEX-26

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESNOYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESNONO

NOYESNONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONOYESNONO

NONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESNONONOYESNOYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

111

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-26

MALTEPE

YESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONONOYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNOYESNONONONONONOYESNONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYES

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

112

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

PENDİK

ANNEX-27

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

YESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESNONONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESYES

YESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

113

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-27

PENDİK

YESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

114

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

SANCAKTEPE

ANNEX-28

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONO

NONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

115

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-28

SANCAKTEPE

YESYESYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

116

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

SARIYER

ANNEX-29

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNONOYESYESNONONO

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

117

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-29

SARIYER

YESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONOYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

118

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

SİLİVRİ

ANNEX-30

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONOYESNONO

NONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

119

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-30

SİLİVRİ

YESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

120

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

SULTANBEYLİ

ANNEX-31

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

121

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-31

SULTANBEYLİ

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONOYESNONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

122

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

SULTANGAZİ

ANNEX-32

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESNONONO

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

123

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-32

SULTANGAZİ

YESNOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNOYESNONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESNONOYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

124

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ŞİŞLİ

ANNEX-33

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESNOYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

125

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-33

ŞİŞLİ

YESNOYESNONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNOYESYESNOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

126

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

TUZLA

ANNEX-34

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONONOYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYES

YESYESNOYESNOYESNOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

127

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-34

TUZLA

YESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNOYESYESNONOYESNONONONONONONONOYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

YESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESNO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

128

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ÜMRANİYE

ANNEX-35

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESNONOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESNONO

NONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

129

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-35

ÜMRANİYE

YESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESNOYESNOYESNONONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NOYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESNOYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONOYESYESYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

130

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ÜSKÜDAR

ANNEX-36

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESNOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONO

NONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESNONONONONONOYESYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONONOYESNOYESYESNONONONONONONOYESNONONOYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYES

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

131

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-36

ÜSKÜDAR

YESYESYESNOYESNONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNONONONOYESYESNONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESNOYESNONONONONONONONO

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONONONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

132

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ZEYTİNBURNU

ANNEX-37

Q1.Q2.Q3.Q4.Q5.Q6.Q7.Q8.Q9.Q10.Q11.Q12.Q13.Q14.Q15.Q16.Q17.Q18.Q19.Q20.Q21.Q22.Q23.Q24.Q25.Q26.Q27.Q28.Q29.Q30.Q31.Q32.Q33.Q34.Q35.Q36.Q37.Q38.Q39.Q40.Q41.Q42.Q43.Q44.Q45.

Q46.Q47.Q48.Q49.Q50.Q51.Q52.Q53.Q54.Q55.Q56.Q57.Q58.Q59.Q60.Q61.Q62.Q63.Q64.Q65.Q66.Q67.Q68.Q69.Q70.Q71.Q72.Q73.Q74.Q75.Q76.Q77.Q78.Q79.Q80.Q81.Q82.Q83.Q84.Q85.Q86.Q87.Q88.Q89.Q90.

NOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONOYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNO

NONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESNONONONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNO

Q91.Q92.Q93.Q94.Q95.Q96.Q97.Q98.Q99.Q100.Q101.Q102.Q103.Q104.Q105.Q106.Q107.Q108.Q109.Q110.Q111.Q112.Q113.Q114.Q115.Q116.Q117.Q118.Q119.Q120.Q121.Q122.Q123.Q124.Q125.Q126.Q127.Q128.Q129.Q130.Q131.Q132.Q133.Q134.Q135.

133

RESULTS

GREEN MUNICIPALITYINDICATOR

ANNEX-37

ZEYTİNBURNU

YESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONOYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONO

Q136.Q137.Q138.Q139.Q140.Q141.Q142.Q143.Q144.Q145.Q146.Q147.Q148.Q149.Q150.Q151.Q152.Q153.Q154.Q155.Q156.Q157.Q158.Q159.Q160.Q161.Q162.Q163.Q164.Q165.Q166.Q167.Q168.Q169.Q170.Q171.Q172.Q173.Q174.Q175.Q176.Q177.Q178.Q179.Q180.

NONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESYESYESNONOYESYESNONONONOYESYESNOYESYESYESYESYESNOYESYESYESNONONONOYESNOYESYESNONOYESYES

Q181.Q182.Q183.Q184.Q185.Q186.Q187.Q188.Q189.Q190.Q191.Q192.Q193.Q194.Q195.Q196.Q197.Q198.Q199.Q200.Q201.Q202.Q203.Q204.Q205.Q206.Q207.Q208.Q209.Q210.Q211.Q212.Q213.Q214.Q215.Q216.Q217.Q218.Q219.Q220.Q221.Q222.Q223.Q224.Q225.

NONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONOYESYESYESYESNONONONONONO

Q226.Q227.Q228.Q229.Q230.Q231.Q232.Q233.Q234.Q235.Q236.Q237.Q238.Q239.Q240.Q241.Q242.Q243.Q244.Q245.Q246.Q247.Q248.Q249.

NOTES

NOTES

THE GREEN MUNICIPALSCORECARD PROJECT REPORT

THE

GRE

EN M

UN

ICIP

AL

SCO

RECA

RD P

ROJE

CT

REPO

RT