1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Kevin I. Shenkman (SBN 223315)Mary R. Hughes (SBN 222662)Andrea A. Alarcon (SBN 319536)SHENKMAN & HUGHES28905 Wight RoadMalibu, California 90265Telephone: (310) 457- 0970

R. Rex Parris (SBN 96567)Ellery S. Gordon (SBN 316655)PARRIS LAW FIRM43364 10th Street WestLancaster, California 93534Telephone: (661) 949-2595

Milton C. Grimes (SBN 59437)LAW OFFICES OF MILTON C. GRIMES3774 West 54th StreetLos Angeles, California 90043Telephone: (323) 295-3023

Robert Rubin (SBN 85084)LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT RUBIN237 Princeton AvenueMill Valley, CA 94941Telephone: (415) 298-4857

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

PICO NEIGHBORHOODASSOCIATION and MARIA LOYA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA, andDOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

Defendants.

1

1

Case No.: BC616804

DECLARATION OF KEVIN SHENKMANIN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONFOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEESAND EXPENSES

Date: August 28, 2019Time: 8:30 a.m.Dept.: SSC-9

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

I, Kevin I. Shenkman, declare as follows:

1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law before all courts of the State of

California and I am a principal of Shenkman & Hughes PC, attorneys of record for Plaintiffs

in the above -captioned case. The facts set forth in this declaration are within my personal

knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would competently testify as follows:

Shenkman & Hushes Attorneys

2. I have been primarily responsible for the handling of the above -captioned case

since its inception, and I have been involved in all aspects of this case. My partner, Mary R.

Hughes, has also worked on this matter, as have John L. Jones II and Andrea Alarcon, as

well as attorneys and professionals with the Parris Law Firm, Law Offices of Milton C.

Grimes and Law Office of Robert Rubin.

3. I graduated from Rice University in 1999 and completed my J.D. at Columbia

University School of Law in 2002. I was admitted to the California Bar in 2002, and began

working at Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman LLP (now McKool Smith Hennigan), where I

worked on a wide variety of complex litigation until 2008. In 2011, I founded the law firm

of Shenkman & Hughes along with Mary R. Hughes, whom I had known from my time at

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

4. Mary R. Hughes graduated from California State University Northridge in

1999 and completed her J.D. at the University of Southern California Gould Law School.

She was admitted to the California Bar in 2002, and began working at Gibson, Dunn &

Crutcher LLP, where she worked until 2010. In 2011, Ms. Hughes co-founded the law firm

of Shenkman & Hughes.

5. John L. Jones II graduated from Creighton University in 1996 and completed

his J.D. at Yale Law School in 2001. Following a short career in investment banking, he

began working at Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman LLP (now McKool Smith Hennigan) in

2002, where he remained until 2008. While at Hennigan Bennett & Dorman LLP, and since

2

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

his time at that firm, he has worked on complex litigation and bankruptcy matters, including

the notable bankruptcies of Hawaiian Airlines and Brobeck Phleger & Harrison LLP.

6. Andrea Alarcon graduated from Georgetown University in 2000 and

completed her J.D. at Loyola Law School in 2009. Ms. Alarcon has had an extensive career

in government and public service, before joining Shenkman & Hughes PC. For example,

Ms. Alarcon served as Director of the Los Angeles office of Attorney General Bill Lockyer

and Assistant to Attorney General Jerry Brown, and served as President of the Los Angeles

Board of Public Works (the only Latina to serve in that role in the City of Los Angeles'

history), responsible for an annual budget of $1.8 billion. Important to the instant case, Ms.

Alarcon has also been involved in the Latino civil rights movement and politics for her

entire life.

7. True and correct copies of condensed resumes for Ms. Hughes and I, and the

resumes for Mr. Jones and Ms. Alarcon are collectively attached hereto as Exhibit A.

8. Ms. Hughes, Mr. Jones and I were also primarily responsible for the handling

of the first and second cases brought pursuant to the California Voting Rights Act to proceed

to trial - Jauregui v. City of Palmdale, Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC483039 and

Garrett v. City of Highland, San Bernardino Superior Court Case No. CIVDS1410696. We

prevailed in both of those cases. Following our trial victory in Jauregui v. City of Palmdale,

we also prevailed in both the intermediate appellate court and the California Supreme Court

- Jauregui v. City of Palmdale (2014) 226 Cal. App. 4m 781 (review denied, en banc, Aug.

20, 2014)

9. For our successes in Jauregui v. City of Palmdale, subsequent cases brought

pursuant the California Voting Rights Act, and efforts to end unfair at -large elections

throughout California, I have been featured, sometimes along with the other attorneys of

Shenkman & Hughes PC, in various media, such as the Los Angeles Times, New York

Times, Wall Street Journal, ABC, CBS, PBS, NPR, Los Angeles Daily Journal, Dr. Drew

Show and Breitbart News (claiming that we were ending democracy in California). I am

frequently invited to speak to audiences of attorneys and non -attorneys concerning voting

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

rights and elections. For example, I have been the keynote speaker at Los Angeles County

Bar Association events for young lawyers, and the annual conference of the California

Latino School Board Association.

Our Work On This Case

10. Even before filing suit, we worked with two renowned experts, David Ely and

J. Morgan Kousser, to study Santa Monica's elections to determine whether those elections

were characterized by racially polarized voting - the key element in a CVRA case. At the

same time, we engaged with civic leaders in Santa Monica and immersed ourselves in Santa

Monica's politics, city council actions, and historical discrimination to develop a better

sense of the unique circumstances in Santa Monica concerning race and elections.

Particularly because of Santa Monica's unique reputation and demographics, we also

worked with those same experts to evaluate the likely effectiveness of any remedial changes

to Santa Monica's election system. And, we also investigated the unique history and

controversy surrounding Santa Monica's adoption and maintenance (at various times) of its

at -large election system, to evaluate whether an Equal Protection claim might also be

justified.

11. While many political subdivisions, since our victory in Jauregui v. City of

Palmdale, had chosen to adopt district elections upon receiving notice that their at -large

elections violate the CVRA, we expected that Santa Monica would not likely change its

election system without a court battle. In fact, early in our pre -filing investigation, I met

with then -councilman Tony Vazquez, who had led the effort to adopt district elections for

Santa Monica's council in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Mr. Vazquez emphasized the

continuing power of those who had clung to the at -large election system in Santa Monica in

the past, and doubted that we would be successful in any effort to convince other council

members to adopt a fair district -based election system. Indeed, Santa Monica is

exceptionally wealthy, enabling its council to carry on a scorched -earth approach to

defending its at -large elections, as some of its council members have noted in rationalizing

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

their expensive fight against the CVRA. A true and correct copy of a July 12, 2018 opinion -

editorial in the Los Angeles Times authored by Santa Monica's mayor and mayor pro -tern,

touting Santa Monica's financial resources that enabled it to vigorously litigate (and appeal)

the instant case, is attached as Exhibit B. Prior to filing the instant case, while we did not

fully comprehend the extreme lengths to which Defendant's council members would go to

maintain the at -large system by which they were elected, we understood that they would

fight, and so a robust and complete pre -filing investigation would be necessary.

12. Satisfied that our preliminary investigation justified further action, on

December 15, 2015 we wrote to Defendant, notifying Defendant that its at -large elections

were unlawful and requesting that Defendant contact us to discuss changing its at -large

system of electing its city council. A true and correct copy of my December 15, 2015

correspondence to Defendant is attached hereto as Exhibit C. There is no question that

Defendant's city council took notice of our December 15, 2015 letter - not only did I speak

personally with the then -city attorney, Marsha Moutrie, when I personally delivered the

letter along with several Pico Neighborhood activists (Ms. Moutrie actually communicated

her personal support for our efforts), but the letter was also the subject of a closed session

meeting of Defendant's city council in January 2016. A true and correct copy of the relevant

page of Defendant's city council meeting agenda for its January 12, 2016 meeting is

attached hereto as Exhibit D.

13. We waited for four months - well past the requested response date in the

December 15, 2015 letter - but received no substantive response from Defendant or its

attorneys. On April 12, 2016 Plaintiffs filed the above -captioned case.

14. Defendant quickly sprang into action to retaliate against me personally for

filing the above -captioned case on behalf of our clients. At that time, I was one of three

members of the Malibu Unification Negotiation Committee appointed by the City of Malibu

to negotiate fmancial terms for the establishment of an independent Malibu unified school

district. My counterparts from Santa Monica on that committee walked away from those

negotiations at Defendant's direction, demanded that we dismiss the above -captioned case,

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and even forced the cancellation of the Committee's next scheduled publicly -noticed Brown

Act meeting. This all caused me a great deal of distress, particularly because several of my

neighbors blamed me for harming the years -long effort to establish a Malibu school district

- an effort on which I had spent significant time and resources. Ultimately, I decided,

consistent with my ethical obligations to our various clients, to resign from the Malibu

Unification Negotiation Committee, and make clear that we would never abandon our clients

or our fight for minority voting rights. My resignation letter was published by local

newspapers, and a true and correct copy of that letter is attached as Exhibit E. The Santa

Monica members of that committee returned to negotiate financial terms, and that committee

completed its work without me, but the damage to our relationships with our neighbors and

community, caused by that episode, persist.

15. Defendant's city attorney office has been involved in this case from its

inception, and Defendant also retained the very large and very expensive law firm - Gibson

Dunn & Crutcher LLP -a few weeks after the case was filed. My partner, Ms. Hughes,

worked as an associate at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP for nearly 8 years, and I also

worked at that firm for a short time, so we understood that Defendant's retention of that firm

meant that it planned to spare no expense in its defense of its racially discriminatory at -large

election system. We also understand, from our experience at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP,

what it takes to prevail over that firm, particularly recognizing that we could never match the

financial resources and manpower that firm brings to bear.

16. The litigation that followed over the next three years has been extensive and

contentious. That litigation, culminating in a judgment fmding that Defendant's at -large

election system not only violates the CVRA but also was adopted and maintained for a

discriminatory purpose, and thus violates the Equal Protection Clause, included, among

other things:

An expert -intensive six -week trial;

Three writ petitions;

A petition for review to the California Supreme Court;

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

A summary judgment motion;

Two pleading challenges;

Twenty-four (24) depositions of fact witnesses;

Eight (8) depositions of expert witnesses; and

Thirty-one (31) discovery motions

Furthermore, particularly because of Defendant's publicity campaign orchestrated by its

significant in-house public relations department, we also needed to press Plaintiffs' case in

the court of public opinion and rally support among community leaders, activists and

residents in Santa Monica. Similarly, because of Defendant's efforts to lobby the California

Legislature to amend the CVRA in ways that would exculpate Defendant, we also needed to

press Plaintiffs' case with legislative leaders and Democratic Party officials.

17. Throughout the three-year litigation, Plaintiffs attempted to convince Defendant

that an amicable resolution through settlement would be superior, for all parties concerned, to

a disputed resolution by the court. In fact, Plaintiffs even convinced renowned mediator,

Jeffrey Krivis, to mediate the case for free. Though Defendant agreed to participate in that

free mediation, and then asked for a second day of free mediation (which was held a few

weeks after the first day of mediation), Defendant obstinately insisted at every stage that it

would never agree to any structural changes to its discriminatory at -large election system.

Rather, Defendant's city attorney bluntly explained Defendant's rationale for refusing any

change to its election system, remarking that she "just do[es]n't see any merit in this case."

Even during the six -week trial, Defendant's counsel inquired several times whether Plaintiffs

were ready to dismiss their case, and eschewed my invitations to discuss settlement. Rather,

Defendant complained that somehow Plaintiffs' actions were improper because they were

aimed at coercing Defendant to settle. For example, in opposing Plaintiffs' efforts to

question Defendant's city council members about their campaign finances, Defendant argued

that Plaintiffs' counsel "used the deposition to attempt to pressure Mr. O'Day to settle the

case" and "broached the improper topic of settlement" with Ms. Davis. A true and correct

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

copy of the relevant pages from Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiffs' motion to compel the

subsequent depositions of Gleam Davis and Terry O'Day is attached hereto as Exhibit F.

18. To be sure, though the facts and law certainly support this Court's findings,

decision and Judgment, this case was no "sure thing." In fact, Defendant's counsel was

interviewed by Law.com on the eve of trial, and proclaimed: "We feel really good about our

case on the merits here." Defendant's counsel went even further, stating: "The reality is that

if Santa Monica fails the CVRA test, then no city could pass." Notably, in that same

interview Defendant's counsel stated that CVRA cases are "so costly and time-consuming."

A true and correct copy of the August 1, 2018 Law.com article, titled "In Rare California

Voting Rights Trial, Gibson Dunn Steps Up for Santa Monica," is attached hereto as Exhibit

G. Defendant and its counsel were not the only ones to doubt whether Plaintiffs would

prevail in this case - prior to filing this case, I invited the law firm of Goldstein Borgen

Dardarian & Ho LLP as well as the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund

("MALDEF") to join us on this case but they both declined. Fortunately, other political

subdivisions have learned from Defendant's miscalculation; since this Court decided in favor

of Plaintiffs, many other political subdivisions in California have eliminated their potentially

dilutive at -large election systems, without the need for any lawsuit, as demonstrated by, for

example, the recent reporting of the Marin Independent Journal (a true and correct copy of

which is attached as Exhibit H).

Billing Rates

19. Shenkman & Hughes PC charges our hourly -paying clients $815 per hour for

my time, $740 per hour for Ms. Hughes' time, and $615 per hour for Ms. Alarcon's time.

Mr. Jones no longer works for Shenkman & Hughes PC, but in his years with Shenkman &

Hughes PC, Mr. Jones' billing rate was always the same as that of Ms. Hughes (which is

$740 per hour). We have, in some instances, charged a blended rate for our services. In

those instances where we determine a blended rate is appropriate, that blended rate is $715

per hour.

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

20. In 2014, our firm's attorney rate (at that time, for Ms. Hughes, Mr. Jones and

myself) was $550 per hour, and that rate was approved by the Los Angeles Superior Court

for our work in Jauregui v. City of Palmdale. Since that time, in response to significant

demand for my services and the services of other Shenkman & Hughes' attorneys, we have

increased our respective rates several times, to the current rates stated above. Those rate

increases have not resulted in any decrease in demand for our services; if anything, the

demand for our services has continued to increase well beyond our capacity.

21. In addition to gauging the demand for our services, we arrived at our rates by

surveying the rates charged by attorneys with comparable education, skill, experience and

past results. Our rates are generally consistent with the billing rates suggested by the

Updated Laffey Matrix for attorneys with our respective experience. The Updated Laffey

Matrix suggests an hourly rate of: $685 for Ms. Alarcon - higher than her current rate of

$615; and $742 for Ms. Hughes - slightly higher than her current rate of $740. While my

hourly rate of $815 is slightly higher than that suggested by the Updated Laffey Matrix

($740), I believe my exceptional experience and results warrant a rate greater than that

suggested by the Updated Laffey Matrix. Specifically, very few attorneys with less than

twenty years of experience have been lead counsel in the sort of notable trial victories as

Jauregui v. City of Palmdale and Garrett v. City of Highland as well as a rare trial of a

certified class action, and no other attorneys of any experience -level can claim greater

experience with the CVRA. Even Breitbart, while criticizing our work and the CVRA more

generally, conceded that I am "one of the most prolific and successful civil rights lawyers of

his generation." A true and correct copy of the Updated Laffey Matrix is attached as

Exhibit I.

22. The demand for my services, as well as other attorneys with Shenkman &

Hughes PC, has increased dramatically, particularly over the last seven years. I believe that

significant increase in demand for our services is the result of, among other things, three

recent notable victories our firm has achieved. First, as discussed above, in 2013 we

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

prevailed in the first -ever trial of a case brought under the CVRA, and prevailed in the

appeal of that same case in 2014. Second, later in 2014, we prevailed in a rare trial of a

certified class action, wherein the jury awarded the class of approximately 2500 consumers

we represented more than $4.3 million, including punitive damages. Third, as discussed

above, in January 2016 we prevailed in the second -ever trial of a case brought under the

CVRA.

23. The hourly rates of the attorneys at Shenkman & Hughes PC are also modest

in comparison to the rates charged by Defendant's attorneys - Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP

- over whom we prevailed in this case. For example, filings in other cases reveal both the

historic rates of the particular Gibson Dunn & Crutcher attorneys who worked on this case,

as well as the rate of annual increase in their rates: in 2009 Marcellus McRae's billing rate

was $785 per hour; William Thomson's rate increased from $665 per hour in 2011 to

$864.50 per hour in 2014; Kahn Scolnick's rate increased from $641.25 per hour in 2012 to

$764.75 in 2014; and Tiaunia Henry's (f/lea Tiaunia Bedell) rate increased from $508.25 in

2011 to $631.75 in 2013. This indicates an annual rate increase of 9.5% - 12%, reflecting

both the increase in the prices for legal services generally and the increased skill and

expertise attorneys gain through additional years of practice. A true and correct copy of the

relevant pages of court filings showing the historic rates of Mr. McRae, Mr. Thomson, Mr.

Scolnick and Ms. Henry are collectively attached hereto as Exhibit J. A court filing in

another case also reveals Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP's blended rates for 2018 for non-

bankruptcy attorneys and paralegals: $1,117 per hour for partners; $870 per hour for

"counsel"; $710 per hour for associates; and $399 per hour for paralegals. That same court

filing also reveals the 2019 hourly rates of particular Gibson Dunn & Crutcher attorneys

along with their respective dates of admission to practice law. Based on that court filing, if

Ms. Hughes, Mr. Jones and I were at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP (where both Ms.

Hughes and I worked at one point in our respective careers), our billing rate would be

approximately $1,275 per hour. If Ms. Alarcon were at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, her

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

billing rate would be approximately $900 per hour. A true and correct copy of relevant

pages of the court filing showing the blended rates charged by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher in

2018 as well as the specific rates of various Gibson Dunn & Crutcher attorneys and

paralegals in 2018 and 2019 is attached hereto as Exhibit K.

Billing Records

24. The attorneys with Shenkman & Hughes PC maintain contemporaneous time

records. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of the contemporaneous

records of time reasonably spent by Shenkman & Hughes PC's attorneys in this case. I

personally reviewed the time records of each Shenkman & Hughes PC attorney, and

exercised my billing judgment in deleting approximately 240 hours of time that did not

appear reasonably necessary or reflected small amounts of time for minor tasks. In total, after

those reductions, Shenkman & Hughes PC attorneys spent 7786.3 hours pursuing this case.

25. To assist the evaluation of our billings, particularly due to the volume of billing

entries, I have also categorized the time by task. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and

correct copy of the summary "time -and -task" chart that I prepared from the contemporaneous

time records.

26. Particularly in light of the anticipated complexity of this case and my

recognition that Defendant would put up a significant fight, I invited several firms to join

Shenkman & Hughes in pursuit of this case. I asked Milton Grimes to join us as co -counsel

due to his exceptional trial experience and understanding of racial issues and how to present

sensitive racial issues at trial. I asked Rex Parris and his firm to join us as co -counsel

similarly due to their exceptional trial experience. Finally, I asked Robert Rubin to join us as

co -counsel due to his experience and knowledge in the field of voting rights. Each of these

firms has been involved in this case since April 2016 when the original Complaint was filed.

Though my colleagues at Shenkman & Hughes and I did the majority of the work on this

case, the contributions of these three other firms proved to be invaluable at various points in

this case; without them it would have been nearly impossible to compete with the resources

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

and manpower of Defendant's counsel, both Defendant's in-house city attorneys and outside

counsel at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.

27. While the involvement of multiple law firms was essential to the litigation and

trial of this case, it also posed challenges in avoiding the duplication of work. Even with

these other law firms, we could never match the combined resources and manpower of

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Defendant with its well -staffed city attorney's office, so

we needed to be efficient in the way that we litigated and tried this case; we did not have the

luxury of duplicating each other's work. Though some duplication of work was inevitable,

and even occasionally desirable in limited circumstances, we minimized any duplication of

work by implementing a clear system for allocating work. Specifically, I was responsible for

allocating and coordinating all work by all attorneys, as well as overall case strategy. While

attorneys at firms other than Shenkman & Hughes necessarily kept abreast of the events, facts

and law of the case, so that they had at least a basic understanding of the case to allow them

to do their work when called upon, those other attorneys handled only work, issues and

matters as I directed. My allocation of work was principally guided by the unique strengths

of each attorney. For instance, Mr. Paths and Mr. Grimes are accomplished and skilled trial

attorneys; and Mr. Rubin has decades of experience in voting rights. Additionally, Mr. Parris

has experience in municipal government, having served as Mayor of Lancaster for over a

decade, and Mr. Grimes has first-hand experience in the civil rights movement - bothimportant in this case. I took these strengths (and others) into account in assigning various

tasks, issues and work to each co -counsel firm as well as among the attorneys within

Shenkman & Hughes. Oftentimes work in this case required the involvement of more than

one attorney or firm, and I have always found that it is beneficial to the ultimate work product

to have attorneys discuss issues with one another, however, by maintaining responsibility for

the allocation of all work in the first instance, I was able to minimize duplication of efforts in

this case.

28. While the amount of work required of plaintiffs' attorneys is often greater than

that of defendants' attorneys, particularly because plaintiffs generally bear the burden of

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

proof, the number of hours expended, and the amount of attorneys' fees incurred, by a non -

prevailing party can sometimes be informative of the reasonableness of the prevailing parties'

fees. For the sake of comparison, the defendant in Jauregui v. Palmdale revealed, in

opposing the plaintiffs' first fees motion, that its counsel had worked approximately 2850

hours through the entry of judgment; and the court found 4363.9 hours expended by

plaintiffs' counsel to be reasonable.

29. In order to make the comparison in this case, I directed Marci Hilsinger, a

paralegal at the Parris Law Firm, to submit a California Public Records Act ("CPRA")

request to Defendant for: the aggregate total amount of money paid by Defendant to Gibson

Dunn & Crutcher LLP by producing all warrants approved by its city council for payments to

Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP; and the billing rates charged by each of Defendant's attorneys

in this case by producing the agreement approved by Defendant's city council for legal

services by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Defendant refused to provide any of this

information, and asserted that it would not provide any information at all. A true and correct

copy of Defendant's response to the CPRA request is attached hereto as Exhibit N.

30. We are not the only ones who have sought to uncover this information

concerning Defendant's expenditure of public funds on lawyers to defend its council

members' self -interested decision to cling to the racially discriminatory at -large election

system. As the Santa Monica Lookout reported on March 5, 2019, that newspaper also

requested the same information, and that request was similarly refused by Defendant. A true

and correct copy of the March 5, 2019 article in the Santa Monica Lookout, titled "City

Officials Won't Reveal Cost of Voting Rights Lawsuit Until Case is Closed" is attached

hereto as Exhibit 0.

Fee Awards in Other CVRA Cases

31. Based on being plaintiff's counsel in a significant portion of the CVRA

litigation to date, as well as developing relationships with nearly all other attorneys who have

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

worked on any CVRA litigation at all, I am familiar with the conduct and fees awards in

nearly all CVRA cases.

32. In Jauregui v. City of Palmdale, following an eight -day trial and an appeal of

the preliminary injunction issued in that case, the court ultimately awarded Plaintiffs' counsel

over $4.6 million. In Sanchez v. City of Modesto, the defendant paid $3 million -a case in

which the trial court granted the defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings less than a

year after the complaint was filed, but was then reversed by an intermediate appellate court,

and the case settled with no further litigation activity. Notably, Defendant's counsel (before

he retired), George Brown, represented the plaintiff in Sanchez v. City of Modesto. In

Yumori-Kaku v. City of Santa Clara, the court recently awarded more than $3.1 million in

fees after one year of litigation culminating in a five-day trial.

33. None of those cases was even remotely as lengthy, hard-fought and extensive as

the instant case. Up until this case, Jauregui v. City of Palmdale was the hardest -fought

CVRA case. Jauregui required an 8 -day trial approximately one year after the case was filed;

the trial of this case lasted six weeks and began more than two years after the case was filed.

For comparison, in Jauregui there were six (6) fact witness depositions, all but one of which

lasted less than three hours; in this case there were twenty-four (24) fact witness depositions.

In Jauregui, there were two (2) discovery motions; in this case there were thirty-one (31)

discovery motions. I have been involved in the litigation of multi -million dollar cases since

being admitted to practice law in 2002, and even a multi -billion dollar case that reached the

U.S. Supreme Court (MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005) 545 U.S. 913); none of

those cases have been as hard-fought, extensive, and physically and emotionally taxing as

this case.

Expenses

34. In the course of litigating the above -captioned case, Shenkman & Hughes PC

incurred significant expenses - the majority of which were expert witness fees. Through a

query of our firm's accounting system, I was able to retrieve a summary of the expenses,

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

excluding expert witness fees, incurred in connection with the above -captioned case.

Attached hereto, collectively, as Exhibit P is a true and correct copy of that summary,

organized by expense type (e.g. travel, filing and messenger fees, and meals).

35. The majority of the expenses incurred in this case were for expert witnesses /

consultants. Specifically, expert demographer David Ely with Compass Demographics, Inc.,

Caltech Professor J. Morgan Kousser, an expert on racially polarized voting, history and

elections, survey expert Jonathan Brown and Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt were

invaluable in the development and trial of this case. Their invoices totaled $97,482.76;

$394,712.50; $30,250.00 and $90,155.00, respectively, for work through the entry of

judgment on February 13, 2019. True and correct copies of their invoices for the work they

performed on this case are attached collectively as Exhibit Q. Note that while Professor

Levitt's invoice is for $91,430, a small portion of that invoice is for work after entry of

judgment, and so Plaintiffs seek reimbursement of only $90,155 for Professor Levitt's work

at this time.

36. In total, other than small items for which Shenkman & Hughes does not track

and therefore does not seek to recover, Shenkman & Hughes incurred a total of $633,221.04

in expenses in pursuit of this case.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the

foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 3rd day of June 2019, at Malibu, California.

Kevin I. Shenkman

SHENKMAN DECLARATION

EXHIBIT A

KEVIN I. SHENKMAN

28905 Wight Road, Malibu, California 90265 (310) 457-0970 kishenkman@shenkmanhughes.com

EXPERIENCE Shenlunan & Hughes PC, Malibu, CaliforniaPrincipal, June 2011 - present

Lead attorney on first and second California Voting Rights Act cases to be decidedat trial - prevailed in both, including on appeal - and successfully settled over adozen other voting rights casesLead attorney on rare jury trial of a certified consumer class action, obtainingjudgment in excess of $6 million including punitive damages, and successfullysettled numerous other class action cases.Frequent invited speaker regarding voting rights and elections on radio, televisionand professional conferences.

Zuber & Taillieu, LLP, Los Angeles, CaliforniaSenior Counsel, 2010-2011Associate, 2009

McKool Smith Hennigan, LLP, Los Angeles, California(f/k/a Hennigan Bennett & Dorman, LLP)Associate, 2002-2008

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CaliforniaSummer Associate, Summer 2001

Morgan & Finnegan, LLP, New York, New YorkSummer Associate, Summer 2000Clerk, September 2000 - May 2001

Gifford Krass Groh Sprinkle Anderson & Citkowski, Birmingham, MichiganSummer Associate, Summer 2000Clerk, Summer 1999

Ford Global Technologies, Inc., Dearborn, MichiganIntern - Summer 1998

47th District Court, Farmington, MichiganClerk - Summer 1996 and Summer 1997

EDUCATION Columbia University School of Law, New York, New YorkJuris Doctor, May 2002

Columbia Business Law Review

Rice University, Houston, TexasBachelor of Science, Mechanical Engineering, May 1999

Dean's List

MISCELLANEOUS Admitted to California State Bar since 2002Admitted to the Patent Bar since 2000

MARY RUTH HUGHES

28905 Wight Road, Malibu, California 90265 (310) 457-0970 mrhughes@shenkmanhughes.com

PROFILE Accomplished attorney with over sixteen years of experience in a broad range of legalmatters, including all aspects of litigation, including trial preparation, motion practice,expert reports, depositions and discovery, complex public company mergers, privateequity acquisitions and divestitures, joint ventures, capital market transactions, SECreporting, financing, general corporate advice and contract negotiation.

EXPERIENCE Shenkman & Hughes PC, Malibu, CaliforniaPrincipal, April 2010 - present

Handle all aspects of class action and voting rights litigation, including trial, appeal,class certification, dispositive motions, settlement negotiation, and obtaining courtapproval of settlementsHandle all legal matters for a wide variety of clients, including in the softwaredevelopment, construction, real estate and stem cell research industries.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Los Angeles, CaliforniaAssociate, October 2002 - April 2010Summer Associate, Summer 2001

Handle all aspects of business transactions from inception through closing.Draft and negotiate merger agreements, stock purchase agreements, note purchaseagreements, stockholders agreements, ancillary transaction documents, operatingagreements (such as international distribution agreements and supplier agreements).Experience with partnership and limited liability company agreements and privateequity investments, including leveraged buyout and co -investment relations.Successfully consummate a wide variety of corporate transactions, from a $35million acquisition to a $19 billion merger of equals, including buy -side and sell -side representation of both operating companies and financial buyers.Part of litigation team on complex antitrust matters with over $1 billion in dispute,taking and defending depositions, drafting and opposing motions, and overalllitigation strategy.

Hymes & Company, CPA, Tarzana, CaliforniaAccountant, 1997-1999

Bookkeeping and business management for entertainment and manufacturingclients.

Prepare tax returns and unaudited financial statements.

EDUCATION University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CaliforniaJuris Doctor, May 2002

Order of the Coif (top 10%)Southern California Law Review

California State University Northridge, Northridge, CaliforniaBachelor of Science, Accountancy, December 1998

Dean's List (all semesters)

MISCELLANEOUS Admitted to California State Bar since 2002Passed CPA exam in 1998 (among top 125 scores)California licensed real estate broker

JOHN LORENZO JONES II

28905 Wight Road, Malibu, California 90265 (310) 457-0970 jjones®sheniunanhughes.com

EDUCATIONYALE LAW SCHOOL New Haven, CT

Juris Doctor April 2001

Honors: Earl Warren Scholar, John M. Olin Fellow, Business Plan Competition (Yale School of

Management) - 1st PlaceActivities: Co -Chair, Black Law Students' Association; Legal Services Clinic; Temporary Restraining Order

(TRO) Project

CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY Omaha, NEBachelor of Science in Mathematics, Computer Science, and Philosophy, cum laude May 1996

Honors: University Distinguished Scholar (4 years), Theta Bould Foundation Scholarship, Phi Sigma Tau

HonorsActivities: Board Member, United Way of the Midlands; Captain, Debate Team

EXPERIENCE

Shenkman & Hughes PC Malibu, CA

Counsel 2012-2017Worked on all aspects of voting rights litigation from preliminary statistical analysis to trial to appeals.Represent clients in connection with business and commercial litigation.

Lim, Ruger & Kim, LLP Los Angeles, CAAssociate, Litigation Group 2008-2012

Represent clients in connection with business and commercial litigation and bankruptcy matters. Engaged inall aspects of litigation in state and federal courts.Drafted and argued motions and other pleadings in state and federal courts, including motions for summaryjudgment, relief from stay, demurrers, discovery motions, and non-dischargeability actions. Litigated breachof contract disputes, conducted depositions, participated in mediations, negotiated settlements, and counseledclients.

Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman LLP Los Angeles, CAAssociate, Business Reorganization & Bankruptcy Group 2002-2008

Represent creditors, debtors, trustees, and other parties in interest in corporate bankruptcy and out -of -courtrestructurings, including first day filings, negotiating and adjudicating claims, litigating adversaryproceedings and related appeals.Represented chapter 11 trustee in connection with soliciting investments in chapter 11 debtor. Assisted inpreparation of joint plan of reorganization and disclosure statement, as well as related term sheets andagreements.Represented chapter 7 trustee in connection with the sale of equity and limited partnership interests ininvestment portfolio.Oversee junior attorneys and staff; work with and manage outside counsel and consultants.Representative matters include: Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (chapter 11 trustee, reorganized debtor), Brobeck,Phleger & Harrison LLP (chapter 7 trustee), NorthPoint Communications, Inc. (chapter 7 trustee, ad hoccommittee of bondholders).

Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, Inc. New York, NYAssociate, Financial Restructuring Group 2000-2002

Worked on financial restructuring assignments representing debtors and creditors. Responsibilities includedperforming valuation and claims analysis, completing due diligence, negotiating with creditor groups anddeveloping strategic alternatives.

Participated in a buy -side transaction in the food and beverage industry. Modeled financial scenariosincluding pro -forma acquisition and divestiture analysis. Responsible for executing managementpresentations and assisting with bidding strategy.Primary day-to-day contact and coordinator in a sell -side transaction. Drafted offering memorandum,performed valuation, and negotiated confidentiality agreements and purchase terms with potential buyers.Developed financial models to value public and private entities.

Cravath Swaine & Moore LLP New York, NY and Hong KongSummer Associate Summer 1999

Drafted prospectus and conducted due diligence for the $500MM secondary equity offering by NeptuneOrient Lines.Drafted prospective IPO filing for the China National Offshore Oil Corporation.

Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin San Francisco, CASummer Associate Summer 1998

Developed appellate strategy for patent infringement suit to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.Drafted motion in limine to exclude spoliated evidence and expert testimony.

Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NMGraduate Research Assistant 1996-1997

Designed software and algorithms to collect GPS satellite data, performed data analysis of energetic particledata.Conducted a study of potential causes of false trigger rates of W -Sensors.

Personal Member of California and New York State Bars; enjoy reading, mountain biking, Asian culture, andphilosophy

ANDREA ALARCON28905 Wight RoadMalibu, CA 90265

Office (310) 457-0970aalarcon@shenkmanhughes.com

EDUCATIONLOYOLA LAW SCHOOL, Los Angeles, CAJuris Doctorate, May 2009Law Study Abroad: Universidad para la Paz, Costa Rica, Intl. Human Rights & Environmental Law, Summer 2007

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY, Washington, D.C.Graduate Business Administration Certificate, May 2001Bachelor of Arts, Double Major: American Government and English Literature, Minor: Theology, December 2000

EXPERIENCESHENKMAN & HUGHES PC, September 2017 - CurrentAssociate Counsel for plaintiffs in 6 -week trial re: Pico Neighborhood Association, et al. v. City of Santa Monica

- asserting violations of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) and the Equal Protections Clauseof the California Constitution; Contributed to trial strategy development and preparation of witnessesand evidence for trial; Manage firm's portfolio of CVRA matters in jurisdictions statewide;Conduct historical research on municipalities; Compile election results, census data and related information;Draft complaints, motions, declarations, mediation briefs & other pleadings; Propound & respond to discovery;Appearances in Bankruptcy, Employment, Corporate & Civil matters; Managed execution of Writ of Possessionfrom property seizure to auction; Participate in mediation sessions; Maintain positive client relations.

LAW OFFICES OF MILTON C. GRIMES, February 2017 - September 2017As the firm's sole employee, drafted all pleadings, legal & client correspondence, memoranda, discovery documentsand mediation demand letters in areas of law including: civil rights, criminal law, election law and employment law;Contributed to legal strategy and development; Gathered facts and obtained evidence through thorough document reviewand client interviews; Maintained close client contact regarding case progress and strategy; Created deposition outlinesfor key witnesses; Conducted all client consultations; Researched case -specific issues of medical standards of careand law enforcement protocol.

GABRIELSALOMONS, LLP, September 2016 -January 2017A small general practice law firm with a primary focus on civil, corporate defense; Propounded and responded to discovery;Transactional corporate work, i.e. establish business entities, drafting corporate documents including By -Laws & Articlesof Incorporation; Other areas of practice include: Estate Planning/Wills & Trusts drafting trusts, living wills, powers ofattorney, advance directives, etc. and Family Law dealing with dissolutions, community property division, alimony/childsupport using DissoMaster, child custody and domestic violence related issues; Conduct Legal Research; Communicatewith clients & court departments; Manage office accounting and support staff.

LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART, February 2016 - June 2016A plaintiffs' employment law firm with a primary focus on wage and hour violations, class actions and PAGA representativeactions; Drafted and prepared discovery requests & responses, pleadings and other client communications; Assistedin development of deposition strategy and line of questioning; Conducted legal research and drafted related memoranda;Created a class action client questionnaire used to collect and compile facts via live client interviews.

ALARCON STRATEGIES, Owner and Public Policy Consultant, February 2013 - 2017Established a public policy consultant firm offering strategic advice and public policy development to businesses and CBOs;Worked with affiliated labor organizations to negotiate Collective Bargaining Agreements and settle/resolve labor disputes;Create and foster positive partnerships for clients with residents, community organizations, businesses and otherstakeholders in municipalities throughout California. Significant interface with City, County and State elected officials.

LOS ANGELES BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKSPresident / Commissioner, Sept. 2009 - Jan. 2013

Served as the President of the Los Angeles Board of Public Works, the City's only full-time, appointed policymaking body. Alarcon was the youngest and only second Latina in the City's history to serve in this esteemedposition. The Board is an executive team composed of five -members, appointed by the Mayor of Los Angeles andconfirmed by City Council to 5 -year terms. As General Managers, the Board of Public Works Commissioners arethe chief administrators of the Department of Public Works, the City's third largest municipal agency which consistsof more than 5,500 employees and has an annual budget of more than $1.8 billion. The Board meets in public forumthree times per week and, during its open meetings, receives bids for and awards 85% of the City's constructioncontracts, develops and implements departmental policy initiatives, and protects residents' due process throughhearings for property assessments, above ground facility and cell tower proposals, tree removals and constructionsubcontractor substitutions. The Board oversees 5 Bureaus: the Bureau of Engineering. responsible for the design,construction, renovation and operation of public facilities and infrastructure ranging from the City's wastewatertreatment plants, bridges, libraries, police / fire department buildings, and other public facilities; the Bureau ofSanitation: responsible for citywide curbside waste collection, wastewater management, hazardous waste collectionand watershed protection; the Bureau of Street Services: responsible for pavement/maintenance of the City's 7,000miles of streets, its urban forest of over 700,000 street trees, its 11,000 mile sidewalk network, and enforcement ofmunicipal codes for illegal dumping, illegal sign postings, illegal sidewalk vending and other encroachments in thepublic right of way; the Bureau of Street Lighting: installed and maintained the LED Street Lighting network; and,the Bureau of Contract Administration: processed contractor bids, contract awards and managed City's ProjectLabor Agreement (PLA).

CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS GENERAL BILL LOCKYER / JERRY BROWNDirector, Los Angeles Executive Office for AG Bill Lockyer, Jan. 2004 -Jan. 2008;Assistant for AG Jerry Brown, Jan. 2008-Sept. 2009

Managed Southern CA executive operations; Crafted a legislative package - "CORE" Collaborative Opportunitiesfor Rehabilitation and Enforcement - to provide funding for offender rehabilitation through collaborative effortsbetween law enforcement and community -based organizations; Served as AG liaison on matters of violence againstwomen through advocacy with the AG's Task Force on Criminal Justice Response to Domestic Violence, the LACounty Domestic Violence Council, the LA City Domestic Violence Task Force and the Inter -Agency Council onAbuse & Neglect (ICAN); Led the AG's Anti -Gang Violence Initiative including the development of a statewidedirectory of gang interventionist and community resources; Reviewed policy proposals; Coordinated AG pressconferences, special events, hearings, interviews, meetings, community events; Designated staffing for the AG'sSouthern CA schedule of events; Tracked priority litigation & legislation; Conducted legal research, drafted andanalyzed legal memoranda, reviewed/revised voter initiatives' "Title and Summary"; and, briefed AG for SouthernCA events; Supervised executive personnel.

GOVERNOR GRAY DAVIS COMMITTEE / CALIFORNIANS AGAINST THE GOVERNORS RECALLDeputy Political Director, Sept. 2003 - Oct. 2003 (Los Angeles, CA)

Contributed to campaign strategic development, particularly related to Hispanic and women voters, spearheadingseveral targeted mobilization efforts including Women Against the Recall, Latinas Against the Recall, TeachersAgainst the Recall, etc.; Convened private meetings with Governor Davis, press conferences and public/privateevents; Coordinated campaign advertising specific to Spanish language media, including radio and television spotbuys to promote our Get Out the Vote (GOTV) efforts; Served as direct liaison and direct point of contact to local,state, county and national elected officials; Developed a network of surrogate speakers against the recall.

TAXPAYERS AGAINST THE GOVERNORS RECALLDirector of Operations, June 2003 - Sept. 2003 (Sacramento, CA)

Developed and managed operating budget; Processed financial contributions; Authorized disbursements for allexpenditures; Managed payroll; Contributed to campaign strategic planning; Facilitation of Press conferences;Political outreach to legislators and other elected officials.

WOMEN ADVANCING THE VALLEY THROUGH EDUCATION, ECONOMICS AND EMPOWERMENTExecutive Director & Grant Writer, Sept. 2001 - May 2003

Alarcon served as the managing officer of the largest transitional housing shelter for victims of Domestic Violencein the United States; directed a staff of over 30 employees including licensed clinicians, case managers, childdevelopment and administrative personnel; Managed an annual budget of over $500k in government funding,including the administration of four sizeable government contracts provided by Housing & Urban Development(HUD), the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) and the LA Community Development Department(CDD); Filed monthly invoices and annual reports; Interfaced with City, County and State Elected Officials;Applied for and Received License for on -site Child Development Center - closed escrow with the CA Division ofHousing & Community Development on a $1 million development project to construct the center; and, restructuredthe programmatic design into a phased system to allow clients gradual progression towards self-sufficiency.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEHate Crimes Policy Analyst, June 1999 - Sept. 1999

Completed preliminary research on criminal hate activity at institutions of higher learning, convened focus groups;Developed and conducted a telephone survey of over 100 college & university Chiefs of Police to assess theirpreparedness to respond to hate related incidents. With the information compiled, authored a 23 -page federaldocument entitled, "Responding to Hate Crimes and Bias Motivated Incidents on College and UniversityCampuses," which was published and distributed by the US DOJ. Interfaced with members of the US Senate, USHouse of Representatives and Presidential Executive personnel.

LEADERSHIP '98 - P.A.C. CREATED BY VICE PRESIDENT AL GORE / GORE 2000Assistant to Regional Director of the Western US, Oct. 1998 - Jan. 1999

Assisted in the coordination of political events and fundraisers in Western states; Prepared Vice President's briefingmaterials; Maintained a database of detailed biographical information on elected officials, dignitaries, and donors.

APPOINTMENTSLOS ANGELES CITY BOARD OF TAXICAB COMMISSIONERSCommissioner, Dec. 2008 - Sept. 2009

Served, by unanimous City Council approval, on the Board of Taxicab Commissioners which advises the GeneralManager of the LA Department of Transportation on issues pertaining to all privately owned taxicab franchises inthe City; Contributed to formulation of the Franchise Request for Proposals and voted to determine and fmallyapprove taxicab franchise applications; Reviewed appeals by taxi drivers who were issued citations for violationsof the Taxi Rules and Regulations pursuant to the LA Administrative Code and other related ordinances.

LOS ANGELES CITY BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONERSCommissioner, March 2006-Dec. 2008

Served, by unanimous City Council approval, on the governing body for the LA Department of Transportation;Provided oversight of the Special Parking Revenue Fund, the 5' largest revenue source for the City's general fund;Contributed to development & implementation of the City's Parking Master Plan, including policy directives forPreferential Parking Districts, valet/curbside parking, off-street parking facilities & on -street parking zones;Determined parking rate increases; Approved appropriations for citywide transportation development projects;Made final determinations for LA DOT personnel action appeals; Approved Ambulatory Vehicle &Operator Permits.

INTERNSHIPSLOS ANGELES CITY COUNCILMEMBER HAL BERNSON12" City Council District, February - June 1997

CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLYMEMBER / DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY LEADER RICHARD KATZ39" State Assembly District, January - June 1996

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCILMEMBER RICHARD ALARCONTh City Council District, June - September 1994

PAST ORGANIZATIONAL AFFILIATIONSCALIFORNIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY, Executive Board Member & Appointed Delegate

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY CENTRAL COMMITTEE, Appointed Delegate

LA CITY HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH MAYORAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE, Chair

COMISION FEMENIL DEL SAN FERNANDO VALLEY, Board Secretary

COMMUNITY HOUSING MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Board Member

CALIFORNIA YOUNG DEMOCRATS, Member

DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY, Member

AG'S TASK FORCE ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE RESPONSE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, Liaison

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COUNCIL, Member

LA CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TASK FORCE, Member

INTER -AGENCY COUNCIL ON ABUSE AND NEGLECT (ICAN), Member

HONORS / GUEST SPEAKER

LA Sustainability Collaborative Award for Leadership: 2012

Hispanas Organized for Political Equality (H.O.P.E.) Conference Speaker: 2012

City of Los Angeles Certificate of Recognition by Eric Garcetti: 2012

Weingart Foundation "Women Building LA" Award: 2011

National Hispana Leadership Institute (N.H.L.I.) Speaker: 2011

Hispanic Heritage Month City of Los Angeles Certificate of Appreciation: 2011

Latina Lawyers Bar Association Award: 2009

LAUSD Board of Education "Extraordinary American Woman" Award: 2006

Georgetown University Second Honors: 2000

Georgetown University Dean's List: 1997-2000

Patrick Healy Honors Fellowship: 1999-2000

Us Department of Justice Certificate of Appreciation: 1999

Georgetown Center for Minority Educational Affairs Certificate for Leadership Service: 1999

Georgetown Young Scholars Certificate for Outstanding Leadership: 1999

California State Assembly Certificate of Recognition: 1997

US House of Representatives Certificate of Special Congressional Recognition: 1997

City of Los Angeles Certificate of Commendation: 1997

Presidential Academic Award for Educational Excellence: 1997

PUBLICATIONSUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 1999, Washington, DC."Responding to Hate Crimes and Bias Motivated Incidents on College and University Campuses"

EXHIBIT B

iI71 TOPICS12 FREE WEEKSSALE ENDS 6/3

SPECIAL SALE 112 WEEKS FREE

ADVERTISEMENT

One -day courses.Executive Education

Register Now

OP-ED OP-ED OPINION

] LOG IN

LoyolaMarymountUniversity

Santa Monica shouldn't have to change itslocal elections

By TED WINTERER and GLEAM DAVISJUL 12, 2018 I 4:05 AM

Santa Monica Mayor Ted Winterer. (Los Angeles Times)

tr r.

The city of Santa Monica received a letter from a Malibu law firm in late 2015claiming that its at -large election system - in which all voters choose the whole citycouncil - discriminated against Latino residents. We were both on the City Councilat the time and found it surprising, not least because the then -mayor was MexicanAmerican.

Still, the letter threatened a lawsuit under the California Voting Rights Act if thecouncil did not immediately agree to change to district -based elections. It turns outSanta Monica wasn't alone. Dozens of cities have received similar demand letters -many from the same lawyer - and many have altered their election systems inresponse.

tnRead Invented by Toads

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Santa Monica, however, has decided to fight this lawsuit. Why? Because makingelectoral changes based on lawsuits instead of the will of voters diminishes ratherthan enhances voting rights. Equally important, the facts in Santa Monica and theexperience of cities elsewhere show that carving the city into districts will notmeaningfully enhance local Latino political representation.

The Pico neighborhood is the focus of the California Voting Rights Act lawsuit, butthe 13% of Santa Monica voters who are Latino live in every part the city. Under ourexisting at -large election system, Latino candidates have won seats on all of thecity's governing bodies, including two currently serving on the seven -member CityCouncil. As the Los Angeles Times reported, in this kind of racially integratedlandscape, a change to district -based elections is unlikely to increase Latinorepresentation.

ADVERTISEMENT

PAID CONTENT What Is This?

In Santa Fe, NM, a uniquedestination spa resort offerstransformative healingexperiences

Sunrise Springs is more than just artesian spring -fed

ponds and lush, relaxing surrounds. Its spiritual guides

help guests heal, grow and clarify their own paths.

SEE MORE

By Sunrise Springs \,%-if

If the California legislature believes that district -basedvoting is the only system that works, it should mandatethe switch statewide.

Share quote & link 0

GrassrootsLab, a consulting firm that specializes in local government politics,studied the electoral outcomes in 22 cities that switched to district elections becauseof a California Voting Rights Act legal threat. Only seven of the 22 cities saw anyincrease in Latino elected officials. Indeed, some people are trying to make the casethat district elections create their own set of problems. The former mayor of Poway,for instance, in October filed a federal lawsuit arguing that forcing district electionsultimately violates the constitutional rights of other voters.

Santa Monica voters have twice rejected proposals to move to district -basedelections, in 1975 and 2002. A district system may work well in larger cities like LosAngeles, but dividing up our 8.3 -square -mile community will pit neighborhoodagainst neighborhood, increasing balkanization and encouraging legislative deal -making to serve the interests of individual districts rather than the city as a whole.

A united Santa Monica has been able to tackle large issues, including crime,homelessness, affordable housing, mobility, economic growth, educationalopportunity and community well-being. We work hard to accomplish a lot, in partbecause council members are accountable to every Santa Monica voter every twoyears. With district elections, residents would be represented by only one councilmember, who would face election only once every four years.

Other California cities believed just as strongly in their at -large election systems.They nonetheless switched to district elections out of fear of overwhelming legalcosts. In addition to paying their own lawyers, cities that lose such cases have to paythe plaintiffs attorney's fees, according to the state law. In Palmdale, where one ofthe first high -profile cases was settled in 2015, the attorney fees hit $4.5 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Enter the Fray: First takes on the news of the minute from L.A. Times Opinion

We are fighting this lawsuit because we believe it lacks merit. But other citieswithout our financial resources haven't had that choice. Instead, decisions affectingthe heart of the democratic process were driven as much by fear of legal costs as bydesire to ensure that everybody's vote counts. This cannot be what the statelegislature intended when it passed the California Voting Rights Act in 2001.

If Santa Monica voters believe that district -based voting will best serve our city, wecan go to the ballot box to make that choice. If the California legislature believesthat district -based voting is the only system that works, it should mandate theswitch statewide. But if state lawmakers believe that Californians should have achoice as to how they elect their local representatives, the California Voting RightsAct should be amended to follow the federal Voting Rights Act, which ensures thatcourt -mandated districting and payment of attorneys' fees occurs only when adistrict -based system is truly needed to make sure minority votes count.

Ted Winterer has served on the Santa Monica City Council since 2012 and iscurrently mayor. Gleam Davis has been on the council since 2009 and is mayorpro tem.

Today's Headlines NewsletterDelivered weekdays

A digest of essential news, insight and analysis from L.A. Times editors.

EXHIBIT C

SHENKMAN & HUGHES

ATTORNEYS MALIBU. CALIFORNIA

VIA EMAIL

December 15, 2015

Mayor Tony Vazqueztony.vazquez@smgov.net

Mayor Pro Tern Ted Wintererted.winterer@smgov.net

Councilmember Kevin McKeownkevin@mckeown.net

Councilmember Gleam Davisgleam.davis@smgov.net

Councilmember Sue Himmelrichsue.himmelrich@smgov.net

Councilmember Pam O'Connorpam.oconnor®smgov.net

Councilmember Terry O'Dayterry.oday@smgov.net

City Manager - Rick Colerick.cole@smgov.net

City of Santa Monica1685 Main St., Rm. 209Santa Monica, CA 90401

28905 Wight RoadMalibu, California 90265

(310) 457-0970kshenkman@shenkmanhughes.com

Re: Violation of the California Voting Rights Act and IntentionalDiscrimination in the 1946 Adoption of At -Large Elections for the SantaMonica City Council

We write to you at the request of several Latino residents of the Pico Neighborhood ofSanta Monica.

The City of Santa Monica ("Santa Monica") relies upon an at -large election system forelecting candidates to its City Council. It also appears that voting within Santa Monica isracially polarized, resulting in minority vote dilution, and therefore Santa Monica's at -large elections are violative of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001 ("CVRA").

Moreover, Santa Monica's current at -large election system is the result of intentionaldiscrimination against Santa Monica's minority residents in 1946. At that time, the at -large election system was adopted specifically to prevent the ethnic minority residents of

September 2015Page 2 of 4

Santa Monica, residing principally in the southern portion of Santa Monica, fromachieving representation on the Santa Monica City Council.

Santa Monica's At -Large Elections Violate the CVRA

The CVRA states in relevant part:

14027. An at -large method of election may not be imposed or applied in amanner that impairs the ability of a protected class to elect candidates ofits choice or its ability to influence the outcome of an election, as a resultof the dilution or the abridgment of the rights of voters who are membersof a protected class, as defined pursuant to Section 14026.

14028. (a) A violation of Section 14027 is established if it is shown thatracially polarized voting occurs in elections for members of the governingbody of the political subdivision or in elections incorporating otherelectoral choices by the voters of the political subdivision....

While Santa Monica is a charter city, and charter cities are granted certain autonomy overthe manner and method of their elections, it is now well settled that the CVRA preemptsany conflicting charter provision regarding at -large elections. Specifically, in a case thatthe undersigned counsel successfully argued, the Court of Appeals found that the CVRAis equally applicable to charter cities, and controls over conflicting charter provisions,because it is narrowly tailored to addressing matters of statewide concern - the right tovote, equal protection, and the integrity of the electoral process. Jauregui v. City ofPalmdale (2014) 226 Cal. App. 4th 781, 798-804, review denied en banc (Aug. 20, 2014).

Based on our analysis, Santa Monica's at -large system dilutes the ability of minorityresidents - particularly Latinos (a "protected class") - to elect candidates of their choiceor otherwise influence the outcome of Santa Monica's council elections.

The key to determining whether an at -large election violates the CVRA, is determiningwhether there is racially polarized voting. See Cal. Elec. Code §14028 ("A violation ofSection 14027 is established if it is shown that racially polarized voting occurs inelections ..." Racially polarized voting is "voting in which there is a difference ... in thechoice of candidates or other electoral choices that are preferred by voters in a protectedclass, and in the choice of candidates and electoral choices that are preferred by voters inthe rest of the electorate." Id. § 14026(e). Racially polarized voting shall be determinedfrom examining results of elections in which "one candidate is a member of a protectedclass or elections involving ballot measures, or other electoral choices that affect therights and privileges of a protected class." Id. § 14208(b).

Our research shows that in the history of the Santa Monica city council, spanning morethan a hundred years, only one Latino has ever been elected to the city council, and there

September 2015Page 3 of 4

has never been a Latino resident of the Pico Neighborhood, where Latinos areconcentrated, elected to the Santa Monica city council. Latino residents of the PicoNeighborhood have run in several recent elections for the Santa Monica city council, andthough they have been preferred by both voters in the Pico Neighborhood and by Latinovoters generally, they have all lost due to the costly and discriminatory at -large system bywhich Santa Monica elects its city council.

Though not necessary to establish a violation of the CVRA, a history of discrimination,and the deleterious effects of that past discrimination on the protected class and its abilityto elect candidates of its choice, are also relevant. Id. § 14208(e). Though Santa Monicais regarded by many to be one of the more progressive cities in the State, as explainedmore fully below, that was not true historically. Rather, Santa Monica has a disturbinghistory of racial discrimination that is masked by its more recent progressive image. Infact, whatever their intention, even recent decisions of the Santa Monica city councilhave had a deleterious impact on the Pico Neighborhood where Latinos are concentrated,for example the decisions to de -fund the Pico Youth and Family Center and to burden thePico Neighborhood with the maintenance facility for the light rail that is planned toterminate near the much more affluent area around the 3rd St. Promenade. For Latinosresiding in the Pico Neighborhood, the lack of representation, or prospect ofrepresentation, on the Santa Monica city council has led to the general neglect of theircommunity. As revealed by documents recently released in connection with anemployment case against Santa Monica, even employment decisions are made by theSanta Monica city council, and so not having appropriate representation on the citycouncil has resulted in a lack of concern for the Latino community of the PicoNeighborhood from Santa Monica's administration as well as its city council.

As you may be aware, in 2012, we sued the City of Palmdale for violating the CVRA.After an eight -day trial, we prevailed. We then prevailed in successive appeals, and writpetitions, and the trial court's judgment was affirmed in June 2015. After spendingmillions of dollars, district -based elections are now ultimately being imposed upon thePalmdale city council, with districts that combine all incumbents into one of the fourdistricts. Moreover, in addition to the estimated $2.5 million paid by the City ofPalmdale to its attorneys, the City of Palmdale was required to pay us more than $4.6million for our efforts.

Given the historical lack of Latino representation, and particularly from the Piconeigborhood, on the city council in the context of racially polarized elections, we urgeSanta Monica to voluntarily change its at -large system of electing council members.Otherwise, on behalf of residents within the jurisdiction, we will be forced to seekjudicial relief.

Santa Monica's At -Large Elections Are the Result of Intentional Discrimination in 1946

Even if Santa Monica's at -large election system could withstand a challenge based on the

September 2015Page 4 of 4

CVRA (it cannot), it would still fall as it was adopted with the purpose of discriminatingagainst Santa Monica's ethnic minority population residing in the southern portion of thecity. That fact alone - that the 1946 adoption of at -large elections was generallymotivated by a desire to disenfranchise ethnic minorities - makes the at -large electionsystem unconstitutional today. See, e.g., Hunter v. Underwood, 471 US 222 (1985)(invalidating a suffrage provision of the 1901 Alabama Constitution Convention eventhough it was adopted 84 years earlier).

This should come as no surprise to Santa Monica. In 1992, the Santa Monica cityattorney retained renowned discrimination expert, Dr. J. Morgan Kousser, to evaluatewhether the at -large election system was adopted with a discriminatory intent. Dr.Kousser investigated the matter, and prepared a detailed report, concluding that the 1946adoption of at -large elections for the city council was likely motivated by a desire to keepethnic minorities, concentrated in the southern portion of the city, from achievingelectoral success and gaining representation on Santa Monica's city council. A copy ofDr. Kousser's report is attached for your convenience.

Despite Dr. Kousser's conclusions, solicited by the Santa Monica city attorney, SantaMonica has not taken the necessary actions to correct this historic wrong. Rather, the at -large election system has accomplished exactly what it was intended to do -disenfranchise the minority residents living in the less -wealthy neighborhoods in thesouthern portion of Santa Monica, namely the Pico Neighborhood. While district -basedelections would ensure that the Latino residents of the Pico Neighborhood enjoyed fairand equal representation in their local government, Santa Monica's current at -largesystem has prevented residents of the Pico Neighborhood from being elected to the citycouncil, despite strong support from Latinos and the Pico Neighborhood.

Please advise us no later than January 11, 2016 as to whether you would like to discuss avoluntary change to your current at -large system.

We look forward to your response.

Very truly yours,

Raeuew T. Sdeokoget*

EXHIBIT D

ClyorSanta Monica"'

AGENDAS

CITY OF SANTA MONICA

REGULAR AND SPECIAL JOINT MEETING

CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS

1685 MAIN STREET, ROOM 213

TUESDAY JANUARY 12, 2016

MEETING BEGINS AT 5:30 PM

CALL TO ORDERPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL

(Please note that Agenda Items may be reordered during the Council meeting atthe discretion of the City Council.)

1. CLOSED SESSIONS

1.A. Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation: Anticipate significantexposure to litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) - 2cases - 1) Part 16 re leasing policy, landing fees and loans 2) Voting RightsAct

1.B. Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation: Consideration of whetherto initiate litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(4) - 1605Ocean Front Walk

1.C. Public Employee Evaluation:Title of Employee: City Manager

1.D. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation - Litigation has beeninitiated formally pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1):National Business Aircraft Association, et al. v. City of Santa Monica, FAADocket No. 16-14-04

1.E. Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation - Litigation has beeninitiated formally pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (d)(1):Mahgerefteh v. City of Santa Monica, Los Angeles Superior Court CaseNumber BC 541 384

The following is the order of business for items to be heard no earlier than 6:30 p.m.

2. SPECIAL AGENDA ITEMS

City of Santa Monica Generated: 1/26/2016 3:34 PM Page 3

EXHIBIT E

April 18. 2016

fu Whom It May Concern:

It is with great trepidation that I lime decided to resign from the Malibu 1. IndicationNegotiation Committee. For sacral years. I have worked tirelessly on two causes aboutwhich I care deeply: 1) noting rights: and 2) local control for Malibu schools. Now. dueto retaliation !Or my pursuit of toting rights for the Latino community of Santa Monica. Iam litrced to step away from my role in pursuit of a separate Malibu school district.

Last week. after reeei% Mg no response from the City of Santa Monica !Or !bur months.my law first. along with three others. filed a lawsuit on behalf of Latino voters against theCity lOr % iolating the CalilOrnia Voting Rights Act, just as we have successfully doneagainst the cities of Palmdale. Highland. Garden (irove and Fullerton. In addition to

iolating the CatilOrnia Voting Rights Act. Santa Monica's at -large election sy stein isalso unlawful because it was intended to prevent minority communities from electingcandidates of their choice a fact that was reported to the City by its own consultantmore than 20 years ago.

;milli': to defend its election system in a court of law. the City of Santa Monica insteadsought to retaliate against me in an unrelated matter the Santa Monica negotiators onthe Malibu llnification Negotiation Committee were instructed to walk away from theimportant work of that Committee in response to our lawsuit. they took that action eventhough the %oting rights of Latinos in city council elections have absolutely nothing to dowith the financial terms of splitting the Santa Monica -Malibu l'nilied School District.

Retaliation for our pursuit of minority \ ming rights is nothing new for us. In the courseof our successful CalifOrnia Voting Rights Act case against the ('its of Palmdale. forexample. my family and I endured death threats. our phones were tapped. and my co -counsel. Rex Parris. who happens to be the Mayor of Lancaster. is still facing politicalretribution from those who purported to be his friends. None of that deterred us fromwinning Palmdale's African American and Latino residents their voting rights: it onlyserved to strengthen our resoke. likewise. the retaliation we have so far endured fromthe City of Santa Monica only proves to us why our case is needed.

I ha% c tOund that the best way to deal with this sort of retaliation is to eliminate thepotential lig desperate opponents to retaliate. Here. that means stepping down from myrole on the Malibu Unilication Negotiation Committee.

While I believe that I am uniquely qualified to serve on that committee, as demonstratedby my successes in bringing the Santa Monica team to the negotiation table. andnegotiating the sensitive agreement go%crning the pay meat of consultants. the retaliatoryactions by the Santa Monica negotiators have caused my in% olvement to become adistraction to the real issues that the Committee is charged with resolving.

April 18.2016Page 2 of 2

I hope that %%hoc\ er replaces me on the Committee ill bring the same passion forcreating a separate Malibu school district that respects all of its distinct communities.protecting the interests of those most in need, and putting an end to the indilThrenee aboutpoisoning our children +ith PCBs. among other things. Santa Monica and Malibu areboth. respectivel). among the \%ealthiest communities in the +orld. With those resources.our schools should he. and could he. so much better than the are. for all of our students.

Sincere!).

KEVIN SHENKMAN.Father of 4 daughters in SMMUSD

EXHIBIT F

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn &

Clincher LIP

CITY OF SANTA MONICALANE DILG, SBN 277220City Attorney

Lane.Dilg@smgov.netSUSAN COLA, SBN 178360Deputy City Attorney

Susan.Cola@smgov.net1685 Main Street, Room 310Santa Monica, CA 90401Telephone: 310.458-8336

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLPTHEODORE J. BOUTROUS JR., SBN 132099

tboutrous@gibsondunn.comMARCELLUS MCRAE, SBN 140308

mmcrae@gibsondtmn.comWILLIAM E. THOMSON, SBN 187912

wthomson@gibsondunn.comKAHN SCOLNICK, SBN 228686

kscolnick@gibsondunn.comTIAUNIA HENRY, SBN 254323333 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, CA 90071-3197Telephone: 213.229.7000Facsimile: 213.229.7520

Attorneys for DefendantCITY OF SANTA MONICA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

PICO NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONand MARIA LOYA,

Plaintiffs,

v.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA and DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

CASE NO. BC 616804 (filed Apr. 12, 2016)

CITY OF SANTA MONICA'S OPPOSITIONTO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPELSUBSEQUENT DEPOSITIONS OF TERRYO'DAY AND GLEAM DAVIS

HON. YVETTE M. PALAZUELOS, DEP'T 28Discovery Referee: HON. LUIS A. CARDENAS

Action Filed: April 12, 2016Trial Date: July 30, 2018

Hearing Date: January 22, 2018 at 11:00 a.m.

CITY OF SANTA MONICA'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL SUBSEQUENT DEPOSI-TIONS OF TERRY O'DAY AND GLEAM DAVIS

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibson, Dunn &

Crutches LLP

political action committees-all of which is publicly available information-and Mr. O'Day's opin-

ion on whether the campaign contribution laws are fair. (O'Day Depo. at 56:6-20, 156:11-157:9.)

Additionally, Plaintiffs' counsel used the deposition to attempt to pressure Mr. O'Day to settle the

case by referring to the expense of litigation and purporting to identify other cities that have lost

CVRA cases. (O'Day Depo. at 113:5-17.) Plaintiffs' counsel also pursued an improper line of ques-

tioning concerning the presence or absence of methane gas in Gandara Park (formerly Stewart Park).

(O'Day Depo. at 104:7-105:21; 107:19-25.) Having asked all their questions, Plaintiffs ended the

deposition without reserving time or the right to recall Mr. O'Day. (O'Day Depo. at 164:11-13.)

Similarly, Ms. Davis appeared for her deposition in Lancaster, California, on October 6, 2016,

made herself available for a full seven -hour deposition, and duly answered Plaintiffs' counsel's ques-

tions for the full amount of time Plaintiffs' counsel desired to depose her. As with Mr. O'Day, Plain-

tiffs' counsel spent a significant amount of the deposition asking Ms. Davis about tangential topics

like the presence or absence of methane gas in Gandara Park (formerly Stewart Park) (Gleam Davis

Depo. at 20:1-21:23) and they again broached the improper topic of settlement to avoid incurring ad-

ditional defense costs (Gleam Davis Depo. at 102:4-103:10). Upon stating, "I don't have any more

questions," Plaintiffs' counsel concluded Ms. Davis' deposition without reserving time or the right to

recall Ms. Davis. (Davis Depo. at 130:18-20.)

Meanwhile, while Plaintiffs were actively pursuing discovery from the City, they have contin-

ued to refuse to provide substantive responses to the City's discovery requests. Since October

2016 shortly after Mr. O'Day and Ms. Davis were deposed-the City has been diligently working

to obtain proper responses to its written discovery propounded on Plaintiffs on August 9, 2016. Due

to Plaintiffs' assertion of baseless and improper objections and refusal to produce responsive docu-

ments, subsequent delay in providing supplemental responses and a document production, and refusal

to provide second supplemental responses to the City's written discovery absent a court order, Judge

Palazuelos continued the trial date to July 30, 2018.

In August 2017, the FPPC issued a Stipulation, Decision, and Order, fining the Huntley Hotel

for illegal campaign contributions to various candidates and committees in Santa Monica's 2012 and

3CITY OF SANTA MONICA'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL SUBSEQUENT DEPOSI-

TIONS OF TERRY O'DAY AND GLEAM DAVIS

EXHIBIT G

In Rare California Voting Rights Trial,Gibson Dunn Steps Up for Santa MonicaSaid Gibson Dunn's Kahn Scolnick: "The reality is that if SantaMonica fails the CVRA test, then no city could pass, becauseSanta Monica is doing really well in terms of full representationand success of minority candidates."

By Ross Todd August 01, 2018 at 09:20 AM

1'Rift& stielt-11110.11r,II

^

%al °NC

I tilt_II 41

Santa Monica, California. (Photo: oneinchpunch/Shutterstock.coin)

At the Stanley Mosk Courthouse in Los Angeles Wednesday, proceedings are

set to get underway in a rare California Voting Rights Act case to make it all the

way to trial. The 2001 law, designed with an eye toward making it easier for

voters to challenge local voting procedures that dilute the voting power of

minorities, has come under fire of late from critics who claim the law does

more to line the pockets of plaintiffs lawyers than it does to boost the prospects

of minority political candidates.

Count the team at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, which represents the city of Santa

Monica in a CVRA lawsuit, among those critics. The firm has signed on to

represent the city in a lawsuit which claims that its citywide election system,

instituted in 1946, was designed to prevent Latino voters from picking the

candidates of their choice. The trial is set to play out in Superior Court Judge

Yvette M. Palazuelos' courtroom over the next four to six weeks.

The Recorder spoke with Gibson Dunn partners Ted Boutrous and Kahn

Scolnick, two members of Santa Monica's defense team. The following has been

edited for length and clarity.

How did this case come to you?

Boutrous: It's really interesting. This statute, the California Voting Rights Act of

2001, has not really been litigated much. It was enacted to make it easier for

plaintiffs to succeed on a claim that at -large elections dilute minority voting power

and it has a very good purpose to it. But starting about eight or nine years ago, it

started to become more of a plaintiffs lawyer fee -generating machine rather than

a statute that's actually making elections fair. And this same group of plaintiffs

lawyers has been sending letters to cities and school districts making these

demands. And the statute has a fee -shifting provision that also allows attorney

fees plus experts' fees.

Most of the governmental units, rather than face expensive litigation and potential

fees, have just been changing their system. Santa Monica strongly believes in

a fair voting system and at the same time believes its system is fair and complies

with the law. It decided that it's going to fight this because it believes that it's in

the right. The city interviewed a number of law firms and we sat down with them

and they chose us to represent them. It's great in the sense that they strongly

believe in the purpose of the statute and here it's being misused.

Scolnick: Only a couple have gone to trial. Even in one that was disputed, it

wasn't about liability. It was about a remedy. So, they're almost never decided on

the merits. It's so costly and time-consuming. You need experts.

So, how will you attempt to make the case that at -large voting isn't dilutive

on minority voting in Santa Monica-or is the burden on plaintiffs to show

that it actually is?

Scolnick: The burden is on the plaintiffs to show that it actually is. But we can

actually show, and I believe it is undisputed, that there is no vote dilution. And the

way we do that is because of the demographics in Santa Monica.

The Latino population is pretty small in the city. It's only about 13 percent of the

citizen, voting age population of the city and it's dispersed throughout the city.

The Voting Rights Act claims were meant for these areas in the South where

there are these large minority populations that aren't able to elect a candidate

even if you had districts where they would be a majority of the district. That's just

not what Santa Monica looks like.

Both sides agree, the best you could possibly do, even if you ignore all the

constitutional requirements about how you draw a district, is around a 30 percent

district. That basic, demographic fact shows that they're not going to do any

better in a district. In fact, they would do worse. They wouldn't have the ability to

elect the candidate of their choice in their district. And then two-thirds of the city's

Latinos would be living outside that district. In other words, you'd be splintering

and in the language of the Voting Rights Act, you'd be "cracking and packing"

Latinos, diluting their voting power by putting them in districts. Whereas now,

where everyone gets to vote three or four candidates every election, Latinos

have consistently been able to elect their candidates.

Who are you up against on the plaintiffs' side?

Scolnick: Kevin Shenkmen [of Malibu's Shenkman & Hughes]. is certainly the

front man. There's a team of law firms. It started right after the law was enacted

in 2001. The person who drafted it was the original lawyers, Joaquin Avila, who is

longtime civil rights lawyers in California.

We represented several plaintiffs suing under the California Voting Rights Act

early on and so, as Ted mentioned, it was 10 years ago or so that it went from

this good -purposed and well-intentioned statute. Kevin Shenkmen and Robert

Paris, who has his own personal injury shop in Lancaster, they somehow got

affiliated with the group of civil rights lawyer [including Robert Rubin] and they

began driving the train and littering the state up and down with demand letters

and warning letters-dozens and dozens of cities and municipalities and school

boards across the state of California.

Our big point is that it's doing so without being litigated and doing so without any

proof that you're actually helping. I think the L.A. Times reported that as a result

of all these changes in district elections, there hasn't really been any increase in

minority representation.

Boutrous: The other thing you see is they send these letters out, they go into

these municipalities without doing any real study about whether the provisions of

the statute would require some change. It's a little like we've seen before in

California with some of the environmental regulations or public accommodations

where it becomes a cottage industry that's separate from the purpose of the

statute. It's high irony that Santa Monica is the target of this lawsuit. It's a great

client to work with both in terms of the results of their elections-if you go outside

the city council, again it's very diverse.

Scolnick: The school board, the college board, the rent control board ... it's

super -representative. Latino candidates do better than white candidates on those

boards. Look it's Santa Monica, it prides itself on inclusiveness and diversity,

which is part of the reason why it's fighting this suit. It believes it's doing the right

thing. The voters in Santa Monica have twice rejected district elections. It's a

small city geographically. So they think that dividing the city up is going to result

in balkanization and horse trading and everybody looking out for themselves and

not really looking out for the city. If you hear the city council members tell it, they

strongly believe that they represent everyone in the city.

So, what's the trial going to look like?

Boutrous: If the issues that are relevant to the statute are focused on, it should

be experts talking about the composition of the citizenry and the results of

elections. But I believe the reason it's projected to be so long is because the

plaintiffs want to put on all this extraneous information about the elected officials.

Scolnick: That's right. Normally in these cases is that you have a demographer

and you have a political scientist and they can put in statistical evidence about

how Latinos and others voted. I think the strategy on the other side is to make

this a referendum on every racist thing that's happened in California since 1800,

and I'm not even exaggerating. I think the link that's missing in the plaintiffs' case

is that all these things that have happened in California that are bad really have

nothing to do with at -large elections. The evidentiary scope is going to be pretty

broad. We're going to talk about methane gas in city parks. We're going to talk

about after -school programs. We're going to talk about all these things with no

real connection to the trial.

Boutrous: That's the plaintiffs' strategy to just go back and focus on problems in

California that were really problems around the country. But that really doesn't

have anything to do with the issues that were presented by the case. We feel

really good about our case on the merits here. It will be very interesting to see

their approach. They're disconnected from the purpose of the statute and we're

going to try to show that. The judge is I think going to give them wide latitude. It

should be interesting.

Hopefully, we can clarify what the law actually means. I think that's one of the

reasons Santa Monica feels it would be a benefit to everyone to have some

clarity on what the law actually means. Plaintiffs have taken the position that

there's basically strict liability-that if they can come in and say there's racially

polarized voting without showing (1) that districts could solve a problem, or (2)

without showing that there's been any harm or effect that's actually legally

redressable. We think that's just wrong.

Scolnick: The reality is that if Santa Monica fails the CVRA test, then no city

could pass, because Santa Monica is doing really well in terms of full

representation and success of minority candidates. That's why I think this case is

so important.

Who is on the trial team?

Boutrous: Marcellus McRae, who tried the Vergara case with me is the lead trial

lawyer, and Michelle Maryott, who tried the Grubhub case with me, will have a

significant role. I will have a role at trial, but since there are important

constitutional issues involved, I'm also involved in more on the broader strategy.

Kahn and senior associate Tiaunia Henry will also be part of the team.

EXHIBIT H

NEWS LOCAL NEWS

More Novato agencies move todistrict elections

Water comes up to the bottom of a pedestrian bridge at Stafford Lake in Novatoearlier this month. (Alan Dep/Marin Independent Journal)

By WILL HOUSTON I whouston@marinij.com

PUBLISHED: April 26, 2019 at 2:02 pm I UPDATED: April 26. 2019 at 6:12 pm

The specter of a voting rights lawsuit has kicked off a wave of Novato

government agencies transitioning to district -based elections.

The North Marin Water District was the latest Novato government body to

begin the switch from at -large to by -district elections this week. On

Wednesday, the Novato Fire Protection District board is set to consider

whether it too wants to make the switch.

"Essentially, we feel that the public interest is better served by our board to

consider a proposal to transition to a district -based election system," Novato

fire Chief Bill Tyler said Friday.

Earlier this month, the Novato Sanitary District Board of Directors also voted to

begin the same process. Preceding them was the Novato Unified School

District and the Novato City Council.

"Now that there are three local agencies that are ahead of us we're hoping we

can have some implementation efficiencies and learning what they have been

having to go through and try to have some common messaging out to our

customers," said Drew McIntyre, the water district's general manager.

Each agency has a tight deadline of 90 days to draw and adopt its own district

maps.

This series of election overhauls stems from a letter sent to the Novato City

Council in February by Malibu attorney Kevin Shenkman, who demanded the

city switch to district elections or face a lawsuit. Reached Friday, Shenkman

said he's generally pleased that his letter has had such a widespread effect.

"That's been the case statewide in a more general sense," he said. "Locally in

and around Novato, it's good to see political subdivisions taking proactive steps

rather than waiting for someone to allege a violation."

The city's at -large elections, Shenkman argues, violate the California Voting

Rights Act by diluting the voting power of protected classes of voters, such as

Latinos.

"The California Voting Rights Act has been the law since Jan. 1, 2003 and I'm

glad to see that jurisdictions are finally getting around to bringing their elections

into compliance," Shenkman said.

While Novato agencies have chosen to comply, they don't all agree with

Shenkman's claims.

"We don't believe that our current at -large elections are not compliant with the

California Voting Rights Act," McIntyre said, but added that "any attempt to

defend against a demand letter would be costly with little chance of success."

Still, others such as the sanitary district say the change falls in line with their

values.

"The district has a commitment to diversity and inclusion," said Sandeep

Karkal, sanitary district general manager and chief engineer.

The financial risk of not complying with Shenkman's demands has proven to be

high for other cities. Those cities that have resisted Shenkman's demands in

recent years have found themselves on the losing end and paying multi -million -

dollar settlements. By going along with Shenkman's demands, the city of

Novato is set to limit its payout to Shenkman to $30,000.

For the sanitary and water districts, choosing to proactively make the switch

helps them avoid the $30,000 payment altogether. The process will still come

at a cost, though. The North Marin Water District anticipates paying about

$75,000 to hoici a series of public meetings arid for its hired demographer.

While sharing resources would have been helpful, Tyler said it would be

difficult to do so given that each agency has its own jurisdictional boundaries.

"Unfortunately it wasn't something we could all do together," Tyler said.

Tags: district elections, election, elections, newsletter,NMWD, North Marin Water District

SPONSORED CONTENT

Dirty dog discoversjoys of bath time

Pnt Club

?PM'Why do you run through the

mud if you don't like to be washed?" That's what Mom asked one afternoonlast month...

Will Houston

5 Questions to Ask YourDigital Advertising Agenc

Get the insights

4.1"rF

adta

EXHIBIT I

LAFFEY 1vITIAT"..47.111111X

Owl

Years Out of Law School *

YearAdjustmtFactor**

Paralegal/LawClerk 1-3 4-7 8-10 11-19 20 +

6/01/18- 5/31/19 1.0350 $202 $371 $455 $658 $742 $894

6/01/17- 5/31/18 1.0463 $196 $359 $440 $636 $717 $864

6/01/16- 5/31/17 1.0369 $187 $343 $421 $608 $685 $826

6/01/15- 5/31/16 1.0089 $180 $331 $406 $586 $661 $796

6/01/14- 5/31/15 1.0235 $179 $328 $402 $581 $655 $789

6/01/13- 5/31/14 1.0244 $175 $320 $393 $567 $640 $771

6/01/12-5/31/13 1.0258 $170 $312 $383 $554 $625 $753

6/01/11-5/31/12 1.0352 $166 $305 $374 $540 $609 $734

6/01/10- 5/31/11 1.0337 $161 $294 $361 $522 $589 $709

6/01/09- 5/31/10 1.0220 $155 $285 $349 $505 $569 $686

6/01/08- 5/31/09 1.0399 $152 $279 $342 $494 $557 $671

6/01/07-5/31/08 1.0516 $146 $268 $329 $475 $536 $645

6/01/06-5/31/07 1.0256 $139 $255 $313 $452 $509 $614

6/1/05-5/31/06 1.0427 $136 $249 $305 $441 $497 $598

6/1/04-5/31/05 1.0455 $130 $239 $293 $423 $476 $574

6/1/03-6/1/04 1.0507 $124 $228 $280 $405 $456 $549

6/1/02-5/31/03 1.0727 $118 $217 $267 $385 $434' $522

6/1/01-5/31/02 1.0407 $110 $203 $249 $359 $404 $487

6/1/00-5/31/01 1.0529 $106 $195 $239 $345 $388 $468

6/1/99-5/31/00 1.0491 $101 $185 $227 $328 $369 $444

6/1/98-5/31/99 1.0439 $96 $176 $216 $312 $352 $424

6/1/97-5/31/98 1.0419 $92 $169 $207 $299 $337 $406

6/1/96-5/31/97 1.0396 $88 $162 $198 $287 $323 $389

6/1/95-5/31/96 1.032 $85 $155 $191 $276 $311 $375

6/1/94-5/31/95 1.0237 $82 $151 $185 $267 $301 $363

EXHIBIT J

Case 2:07-cv-00380-PA-FFM Document 311-3 Filed 09/18/17 Page 208 of 347 Page ID#:5204

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Glascri, DurriCalk:hen-1LP

IGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLPWayne Barsky (SBN 116731)Marcellus A. McRae (SBN 140308)Meghan Blanco (SBN 238171)Michael Anthony Brown (SBN 243848)Carol A. Fabrizio (SBN 258187)Kristy S. Grant (SBN 260016)333 South Grand AvenueLos Angeles, California 9007]-3197Tel: (213) 229-7000 Fax: (213) 229-6604wbarsky@gibsondunn.commmerae@gibsondunn.commblanco@gibsondunn.comtbrown@gibsondunn.com

Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS Esperanza Rogel,Gerardo Espinoza, Oscar Leon, Marcos Martinez,Jaime Torres, and California ACORN, LosAngeles Chapter

Additional counsel listed on following page.

'61 )

"t: itAit

FILEDLOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

APR 0 g 2009

JOHN1CLAAK , CLERK

BY JA TAYLOR, DEPUTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

ESPERANZA ROGEL, et al.,

PLAINTIFFS,

v.

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITYOF LYNWOOD,

Defendant

) Case No. BS106592

)) DECLARATION OF WAYNE BARSKY IN) SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR) ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES

)))))))))))

)

Hearing Date: May 1, 2009Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m.Hearing Place: Dept: 20Judge: Hon. Kevin C. Brazile

(Filed Concurrently: Plaintiffs' Motion forAward of Attorneys Fees; Memorandum ofPoints and Authorities in Support thereof;Supporting Declarations of Wayne Barsky,Marcellus McRae, Meghan Blanco, Michael A.Brown, Kristy S. Grant, Carol A. Fabrizio,Rebecca F. Thornton, Carol A. Sobel, TheresaTraber, Shashi Hanuman, Michael Rawson,Deborah Collins, Craig Castellanet, Karen R.Growdon, and Cynthia Merrill)

Complaint Filed: December 21, 2006

DECLARATION OF WAYNE BARSKY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONFOR ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES

Case 2:07-cv-00380-PA-FFM Document 311-3 Filed 09/18/17 Page 223 of 347 Page ID#:5219

1 certain time entries that were mis-entered into our computer system, and which should have been

2 charged to other clients; these time entries were removed entirely from the attached billing records.

3 21. As of March 18, 2009, Gibson Dunn incurred $1,304,645.50 in legal fees and

4 $38,810.34 in costs and out-of-pocket expenses in connection with its prosecution of Plaintiffs'

5 action. At my direction, however, we have excluded from our lodestar figure numerous attorney

6 (and non -attorney) hours and costs incurred in an effort to seek recovery only for non -duplicative and

7 particularly relevant work. Toward that end, we have: (a) deducted all time, regardless of task, of

8 attorneys who worked less than 10 total hours on the case; (b) deducted numerous hours for drafts of

9 discovery that were not ultimately used; (c) reduced or eliminated attorneys' time entries for

10 depositions and hearings where more than one attorney was present; (d) reduced all time charge for

11 reviewing and summarizing deposition transcripts; and, (e) reduced time charged for an attorney's

12 general background work when the time invested in activities were disproportionate to the time spent

13 substantively working on the case.

14 22. As noted in Plaintiffs' Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees, 1 calculated the Fees

15 Charged using the firm's actual 2009 rates. The following charts detail the 2009 rates of each Gibson

16 Dunn attorney who worked on this matter, the total charges actually incurred by those attorneys on

17 this matter through March 17, 2009, and the total amount the firm has included in its lodestar figure.

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Gibscn, D,,.,&Cmtchor LLP

Total Attorney Fees Actually Incurred & Charged

ex 4 -:,..1 -----,,,,

_41Vr 44 c4,,

o<

,Y ' 4''

.1"

_s 1

15,--- l''. 4.

tk -."4

-14,

'4"uaF-%t

,

l' 4 1.0,0-

-,F. 4, If

1- C

,),, .:. ',,.,..esWayne M. 13arskyPartner, JD 1983

$905 76.75 $69,458.75.1:

75.15,

$68,010.75

Marcellus A. McRaet Partner, JD 1988

$785 339.90 $266,821.50 338.7 $265,879.50

Daniel M. KolkeyPartner, JD 1977

$840 0.3 $252 0.3 $0

Danielle A. KatzirAssociate, .1D 2004

$525 0.4 $210 0 $0

Michael AnthonyBrown

$495 746.9 $369,715.50 738.77 $365,691.15

14

DECLARATION OF WAYNE BARSKY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONFOR ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES

o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0I-% I-% 1-% 1-% I-% I-% I-1 I-% I-% I-% I+ I-% 1-1 1-% I+ I-1 1+ 1% I-1 1-% 1-1 I-% I-1 1-% i-% i-%

DJ N.1 DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ DJ IV NJ Iv NJ NJ N) NI I...) NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NI NJ DJ NJI.0 ID 1.0 ID LO 00 00 03 00 00 CO V vl V 01 an 01 01 01 01 01 In UI Vi In In%

.I-1% I-1 I-% I-% I-4 Ds I-% 1-4 I-4 i- i+ 1-4 I-1 I-% I-4 N 1-% 1-.1 1-1 I+ I+ I+ I -s I-4 I-1 I-1I+ I+ 1-% I+ I+ 1+ I+ Ns I-1 I-% 1-% I+ 1-% I-% I-% Ds i+ I+ I -s I-1 is.% i+ I+ I+ I-% I+

"C) CO -17 -I -1 V-1 0 0 CA.I-0021/1,. CO CO (4)E31-401 G.) az G) G-)m = = .,cu 0) 01 CU E. 10 0 CU a) -' fD CD 01 11) a) a)

cF0.CD CT

0 0 _ _< 6 ef) ° n § 0.

m0_(3

CeCe00w=< 4 ID_ -5 , 3 3 2, ETz m if if5 5 m CD., 0a . ze 2, :.< .7, 2 2, -.1^ a' ;^ P 8 ... 9 6 6 -0? ? .T-. . !-- 73 .0 7i rl !-- oo ? P ri

* FE?

. * *

crl I" A A e, N NJ 41. I" et C) O N -l V I+ NJ 0 A CD 5D A UJNJ UI to IV in in ix 4., W yr 4.1 ID W O V 00 in :tor in A it.) W to in 00CD C) CD 0 CD CD CD CD C> CD 0 C) C) CD CD C4 C) C) CD CD C) CD C) CD CD C)

in 111. ti1 in in in in in in in in to tn. 4.1% in. in in in in in in in in in in in v%A UI A 01 01 UI 01 01 UI A Cil CO U1 1.0 al UI UI VI ID (31 at CI CT UI Clt CO unO 0 0 01 CI W I" I" W 0 I+ 31 W A 0 0 0 W A 01 01 1-1 I" 0 I" I" ll..)00 00 00 4.J7 1.17 Fil :s4 N 01 CO V 43- 01 LA in 00 00 511 U1 yl UI V :dJ 00 1 V CDUI IV In 8 b V UI VI V In in in ;...1 1.) b NJ iv V iv .0. b in in 1,..) in In

giO , o o UI 0 0 VI 0 0 0 In VI 0 UI In UI In 0 0 0 0 in 0 0 U-1

in in in in in in. in in in in in. in in In in in in in in In in in in in in in tn.A W CT t.) 1...,.) CO 1.0 1-% DJ al Id" V I-% 1.0 I" IV .!JJ LO NJ NJ NJ I-% VI NJ NJ 1-% V-1ID t.0 x, 01I-% VI 11, 0 DJ ` 1.,., Ds 'in V01 A 7_, 1.0 03 I+ i ..., CO

D.1 1.0 01 00 0 N LO I.0 !A Ch b 0 N X- Pe i+ IA 1.0 A Ns N CFI 91 1.0 VI te 03 .34 cr, toN W L...1 Lo NJ I-% I.) o 00 -4 to o o is.) o ...1 i-k A UJ 0 W NJ V V tr, ...1 ID0 in to b in w in is, b in :., in w Cr in b be co i_, o g ton 1-, at Nt-,W o 0 VI w at o UI 00 W IJJ 0 VI UJ

73 -0CAD 7 3**733373 237373C1073710,"

CD "I CD 7 IT 5 n) al to CD CD 0 0 MI 7 7< 0 < < S) 0 in in <. < <. G. n < <.rT c 4. 2 co ro' on (1:` c -c a mo o g c° m rt,'n m 00- ct 0z 3 o-0 = . .-%

= 0.1 017 3 ; IS 0 7 p. a =. 01 ra

ea. , * 0) v, G E 0. 0. m 0. 3 con el- 8.2- 3,01

007 0. co Ea c -0 31 -1 3) F. 12- c7 ° 7 7 LI 51.

7fo et -0 71 7 v, 0 7.1' 3 __fp + co - ca =I 0 a ,e, ap. z _. 0rt In CD +I 1.7, (-13, CL %.< = InN fD 0 c..,.-%/07 -107 etO 13 c) 3 0 n301:1-0 010

7.1..1 Ss) a -i grj. oo F.' 3 c.c. 0 0 0 u. G. -. t-±

o ,- CD 0 5. = ot. co L2 c CM .e, 0 -0 In ,., cf,(A 0 3 - co o 5' cl 2 7 - CD 7 + C 0. ir CD 0 IV 71 0.1CO- < .... 13 MCD'

en 0 j + 0700-<,.,Ovo 0 n -' = 5 0 in G- 1cI 3 z0 el. .., .4. Go (7) C.3 -.1% > . 71 j Z 0 ,Ce + -N 0 CD C 00 C. ns) -0 '0 ee 0 rl 11/

ro c ELm o 0. 0 -p. (1) co 0 0ro 5' F. a; 0 0_ = .-. C 0 0 p.,, . -, ....<, 3. 5. fl, 3 7 C + -i Cu 3. TA 0.".4

,-,. -, 3 0 Lt1 iir r3, n 3C la 2. 4 ' z° 21- cm ba 80 5 c 0 4 0 .". CT CD"

5- a v. 7 0 7 0. 5 -oto to ::.1.,.) o .. r, 73 3- z 11., 01 5 ro T- E.',= 53, g 3; 2 tom__ TI", a F5 m E4s 00.0 a, op 3 CO 000 v. 3 6 re * 0. > m- o r,On CD ..< 13 -+: 0 O.3

, dEr c = ..-4= .3, N. -9, -1:, .1-. 3. z- r,m 31. 0. E,. .,. G. m 00 M vi.-4. - a...--..°7,,. 43 4.0,00= a) Clen ...... - M 3. in o w 127 Er gl g7 ..-. in - in 0 iil. 74 * = tn 5

2" °- RI X 42* g 3o 0 i..) ., 0i'D -----0)

zta

a) FoCL C~II -0 00

- , .0 z 00 0. -0 a)

oc" 2 3 0. IS Fl. '0 CL fp Ft: 3 u,o o

0_ 3 3 v 0- we v , 0 aoCD g a u. - A.: Fo

IA 7 -7m

G.LAI -I. IAcoc-3,... m c-'.. 0 0-,, -Fzi cc c

I. In I-% C. 0 3 g o) o0o -0 a 0 o ), 2 73 on

IA B *> -81 -0 3 8 0. r) 0) cm dr.,.17 a CL 0 3 , z -

m Li -2 1Z ! oPI 17r,o o Duio--o 'A.:

0=

,-. 0 3 ro. g A a 0). ,7, 3 ea

-0 a.in 0. 5 2, a cu !" 0

elI33 ,=. Z V CILZ ,10'

vt rg, .7.. ort o 3c if, oN 0 auz

0im o 3 7. ro

fDCL0 3 .... 0 7

is) estCL -I 07 0 to

w2, % 0_0,

aa 0_ID

01

= 73 15 n Fts 171 73 A In 5. 7301 M fD -- 0 v, 0 3 CD 10 n M

. tc. Ft _, o 0 3 gt ,,,.0 < C I-,ro RI -o x- 3' cu 2,, u; 41 5' 03'4 co*.

* n . ° a A 5 ^ R tvN 30 07 xj° W CU 027 .0= Fo,m niff ..z z a 0d-- =

1.4o ,r, i 0 * n o m a wo

07 0)3.0 - M 'A o e

N.m. * 0 ,- ,

NIP.2 cL, 3o- - = ? .< 0 "0 7 -CM 7 -0 :' 73 2 r., eam m z 0ci. 73 07 _1 ke, .6. 00 ..1 In .-%

i0 '0 7.0 - 7 0 F.,: 'e 7 R. 00 E..9.0. 0, 0 m w m,"3ocog ,-

S3 z r, ca co. ,4 = IA e. rt 5 '-'' 3 3o 7, -, al o CD 0 rl < VI 07 0 0 a., ta "0C 01 n n 7r =3 z Fa'

2-7,- ,-i' 3 o- a 3-

CD 0c c c. 0_ ,a FIT ,' 07 9, m = 0 cr, FC 5.tn fiT 427 fpr' 97 3 4, . CO 0.-.. ID B - z2, 4 cm 8 °Q "ncr m w SL- mrot -5u; -, to

C 2 23- 3 ito'u, n 0 2. o 0

cc: CD r) ro ,. o 9, -11 0.17- * Fot00 0 d -I. - 1 .07 17,1.5 0 '- 0 2 n 3 cl,z 0 n73 -D .1... = 1111 OT1. -C 0 CL

fl) .o. 0 0) a c 3 ao 0-m 0. A.:0 -, .-- = o. 3. - z 0rl. o 7,;',, to, z _ 73 = Eil 5.

O 2 4 F, VI S'iv 0 14 (3 bo

", OCI V'3 -, 12 i) gno ro

Er.

to G. < 013 c F 5' 5c xi

c03*-I7

IDft, E 2 oIn In na) 5

z cm 73 S' 5' r -t 8CL v, 4.1 0. 2. g 30- Ce 0 IA 3

- 3 .... o 1:173 -I, 0.)CI 0F)c

to A' 0 v. -'VD CD .-1.. ,nn m* ri, 0 n:. 00

?

a-,-,. -a- 0a)

q a, Elo. o. z0.

GI 0 0 cmN ,-t

CliN 7 2L1 " 70 IO

ID

3eD

73

CD

OC

01

0

C)P.)

CD

I-

()

OO(0

7

ro

5,pSmr)

a)D

on (0

a

CDQC.)

00

sv-0

(SDri)

W

0 0 0 0 0W U./ U./ WNJ NJ NJ NJ NJW W N NIWWW UJFt

WI-,

I- Vs(

7 r -D fD

Iv IT .7- Ets

M 'r

CD

SD

0000!.nLc0000

4A V3 413 Vf 1/.01 LL3 V 01 alU1 N W to U1O cr+ m o o

iJ kJ V VIA to to to VI

4A. ils IA VT V,I-, VWCO IT CO I50D IAt." w ;71

W 41, AW LW U1 b

(11

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0WWWWWOJWWWNJ I-1 I-. I-, I-1 I-1 NJ F.NJ SO to CO 00 vl LI1 01 F.,

I-. I-, I-) I-1 F. 1-1WWWWWWWWW

CO I- 03 r- 03M fp M CD1:0

fD 0CLP

3CLfp MS° C IT/co to

613

71 ri rl 7J 8

N 4' VI PA0.PQ Ln V0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co

4." VS. 1" V, 'CA 411 tr,31 31 cn 01 ol 01 co cr,

O eUJ%VI W VI

CO CD NJVI F.o C)

vlvl V :4 V V Q

Ln ix Log Ln ton Ln

Ll 4" 4^ VI. Vt V. 411 4A IAVI A I-, CD N W

Lru I-% ts' 1.0VNJVIPOOP0/1'1'L0000001011.40101C0O'3COLO 00Iv VI 000 0 0kJ0

0 0 0 0W W W NJ...... ...... ......

8.......

8 2 NJCOv.. s... ......

UJ LIV W UJ

m rm 3 z?i if m to

C4-,r a 2

PP ?

0 r) ,, -I 3:f c) n co el 3 c:, > co 0 -0 7,- 1.-, 0 rD M m 0 o) ro 0 (OD a. f3 co to.

7. '4 0 "0 0 5' * 5 FoN '7 3 S v) ow Po. St ari' 2 * gy; * c ,- 0 f F,,, 0. 5. ; 3; 0gf019303"'g3MS°7 2, ct. .. ,-t_9, a) 0 ro 000-00 .-1. ..., 7 0 fp -'.7 n m '15.4 (12 "d v. 0 0: c -. A8.0)u.010.am0,5Fi0soz 0...zoc=oo<0 oo....._.m0 ,a N rD M Ns. ILI 170 xj: r, o3.o 5' 's _0 -s 5 < o 0- 8 0- 8' rT= as3 '0 af 'CI rta I'D 0 ..4. fp CI s./s CD 7 3NI =, s7 0. 7 fD 5 < 0 N VIcro F < n 5. 6- - .N.; 0 r., co) ci, 0 a c '00 0 .. In ,.. 7 ..,37. = ° * c c 8 li 3 0 a 0 w, '",w, N CfQ 00 NI. 7 -s fp Mb 7,. m 0.

7 l- a" X''' '1' a flIs '0 073 ri, f's 'T C C° a' 6 = EC 3 -I. co n 0 g Jg-. 0, -,. 0. < < _, 0 < 0 0 00 -0 A, (I) A., 1:3 et Or Ott fb 7

014" Ms. 0 ° 0 - ° ° 5 .....° R 7 ,ID <. -s 7 0 0. on 0 cn

ro

EL- 'MT 5" n 3. 0 m- o_ .. 17' DI esfp CIO 7 41 7 OD "-- 0 ro -o a: ID, re o a, 0 0 6" De -0 ra. ,Et Ur a 2i a ZT eS . a 1 g g * Er"s r In. -,-' L7,' 10 t-- E .% .... n5 Fit cr-D. rti; 5 0 5 - =

A o 3 0 0 r, -n Ft 0:cm0-3 0. c 0- -net Sm 0 0 0 co [12 0. m -, 0°

fp' 75' 11. 0. 07 00 3 -pt n ooO) L., 0 ..., ca , °0 LI, a -nn c A c 0 - m . ea ton

'9, a- * 1:3 S 0 -Ig% n. -. A 7-7 0

.171 17m=to co 5. co' 0 z- 7, -, o r,

.-r 0 ot_ fDM 4, f -I.

= tr, = M 0 (D, 0.-0 ro -0 a. o a *,7 7 ...7 7 F

N ei a 0- .=

00 0) ..I Inr3 00 .-s vs gm. - fA0 ° fts rt, mo to 01 0- n 0 m=

CD

7.'oc c ..<

N1.,, mu,

co IA 7 -0 Ck W afig g g.

cm

In tr, 5cm

3Q o 0 IA- 5 5 V%

ci%

-a 3 0 - 3 1) co0 g- wINI "-.I. r 0 8. 0_ crT a 0:3 a m 0 s<, a- to ,.. * ...:.. oo

CMIT * 7 0 to o n,

CUn 0 -0n

Cio 0 0. 0 .7-0 cc, C 0E.' a 0 ' ' toge I 0m m

--sI./2

0 0NJ NJNJ NJ00 V"sv

o (T.

r :o

s >CV

07 Fo

3 g <CD

c°. *r°g0 00 -0

.? O0- C 0 000 P. m

3 = -o 0 001

c-I tn. OD

e 3 g-s DJM m 0-

M01 m2 c 05 °- M00

C=

m

0) In

3.ED nm- C0

.

". 0T0*0/ 9, 07 - 7°- n ro

to

CD

01

"6"

0 a 0 8 c ri5

_- , . . , .= *8.. 00 ,.3, 7 on 5' 0 3 0 oc

70

°0ert 00

0- *

-I4 0

a 0 m

0- 17 3-'cr = DI

ir F%n)

<a/

g R m ecco o o 0 CV CfQ

0 Oc VI et 01

.:- 2.+-. 8. g <. 0 ,-.,

00vs CU en

5 3 oi Isco ...,

c4fD5

A. 0 0 7 M 7, coo) m ,

2. c` 2 0.a(Dm "3. 8 M,`"0..0

-0 0- 9-gr94 'a el Fio=CI C .2 . ro0 ro 0 3,^ I" t7; 7 v's.

re 5. ED o: o MR 5' Cul

an v) mcli Ff. * A7% Z n - o., - m.

D., c 3 mru 3.. 0 0:c- < D =Q 0_ ru

al °- '1' 0 *-, o.=,: n q,

In° co " co-1. = fp = e, oOm~u

r, CD < a meR IT. 07,. ea, 0

F, O NS

8 olo O o

00

1.001

4."!-""

-J0

0NJ

tO

01.7%

CM

In

tO

L/1

ill- ii/ VI, ,J1N4 A CO CO

-,..., CV Cr CO

0 I=. !.° WW 01 NJ 6i. W In VJ00

3 3. 44: 3 a." g0 70 A/ .7. 7Q 0 .7 3 .7Cf. 0/ = 0) 13,4 (D

8 5 0-4. E" 3(D 03 -to 01 In

CT- 3 oS.D

3 a 8G -443 g

Ott 0 2%

oo 0..-% =o 00

roEP, El, 4 %) .". 0:

= -,

a 92. .- a ,..5 R 0 ,,- 5

K 3 on m 'i -<° i : 3 177Q

-, aro

co.,,, 7 vs ID 00 fp- CI CD 0/ Cl/ -I m cCU 5 . = -, 5. ..2 a

5'03 m * 7 ov

3 co m el0 m n (b 3 Pt Ceu `.., 0 fp 33 m 3. 7 ,f0 o

mPre m re ? g 0a 'I eta. 3 0. 3 u. P

.mom.(1) 0n A eu.

D7

A-,..

-r.3 Nm

-s

CD

m3

CD

3re

M

3OC

DJ

cp

OO0)

(")nTI000

cc4-1

o r.cp= uu

`<°,1-10

CD

eL0(4)

1-1Co

CD

LCD

CD

0Cs)01

O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0NI NJ NJ 1-, I I-, 1-4 I-1 14 1-4 1-4 1-4 I-. 1-, 1-4 1-. - 1-, 1-. 1-, 1-4 I-1 I-, 1-4 V-, 1-4 1-4\ \ \ "...b.. \ ,, , ... \ ----.. "...b.. .... \ \ s, ....... "...... \ `,.. \. \ "---.. ...... ,, --....0 0 0 W (1./ W LY W Lk./ Ls/ W L1J W W W NJ NJ NJ NJ Is) NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ1-4 I-4 I-4 1-4 I-- I-+ I-. 1 /- 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 00 V s..1 .....1 ss.1 ,4 b...J V -.4 -.4 .4.... ... ,.... '.... ,..... --.... -..... ,..... ....., ,, ,, ..... --, ,, ,.... --.... ,..... -... '... ,... ,.... -..... -.... -... ...,IA I-, i--, - IA I--, i--, 1-, IA I--, - - IA 1-, IA IA I-. 1- 1-, IA IA i-, I--, IA IA IA I -IIV NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ N.) NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ

1- > 30. > > > > > I- r- 00 03 > > 0 > r- i- CO CO > > as0 0_ a CL 0_ a a. 0_ M ro 0 rD a a (1)a M CD CD CD a a

5' N N N N N N N P SD a a N1 NI rt N M SD a a. N N0- P- P- S P- 7- (D r° 7 7 3= o fl) 7 R," z- =-,-,

g (SD el) CD M a) CD 0 K ,..... rD K K (D M3 3 3 3 3 3

..< 71rli 3 3 at 3 - 3 3 3 3..< -..< -.< .< ..< -.< . . o< -< ,:', ...< 71 71 -.< ..< ..< ..<co co 0.1 co c).) o) 0 co 1:1) m N10 CO? P .P ? .P .? P P P P I) % > M p

> > > >-

> > D ? ? ? )0. ? ? )0. Ir

P '-' 01 ht p UJ 0 0 0 0 0 1-, 0 0 0 0 I-4 9 0 i--t 1.., 0 o 1.-+ NJ 0 0a. in Li 1..n 1.-> 0 :o- i.,J In 41. k.) :r0. ir-I k.) k.) :-.1 i.ri co ki be r..; k.) I-, INJ b A A0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

N N NN 'US to (./1. iff. NN V/ VS i.a. NN tn. tn. ix,. to .1.11. tn. tn. 4.n. 4./1- NN tn.O

U3 U1 U1 U1 U1 Lf, Lo U1 Cl Cl tft txt v: til co u: 0) Cl Lrt Lit trt VI Lrt Ur U1 Ur0 CI 01 01 01 01 01 CM 01 0 0 01 01 01 01 I-, 01 0 o 01 CO 01 C11 CO 01 01 0103 VI VI U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 U1 00 00 VI U1 VI VI NJ In 00 00 La La La (J1 La La In VIO is.) is.) is..) isl is-, is/ KJ is.) 6 b isJ is.) is) it.) is.) is.) b b is.) KJ kl is) is) IV is) isJ0 Ln In Lrt VI VI In Lrt LI, 0 0 crt VI Lrt u, In In co 0 In In In Lri tri in (xi Lpt

N VS V) ta. VI. ta. ta, i./-1. -CA i.A. tn. ta. i.A. VS -La. .I.a. VS 4./1. Lr1 VS 4.11 QS i./1. t/SCl

In. tn.1-1 NJ

1./1

NJNJ 00 UJ 00 Ur i-t NJ'. NJi-,Cl

NJ NJ 1-, .4 1-1 I-. I-,01 IA IA

U101

00 i-, IA IA Cr 1--, to.....r 1_, NJ NJ

Cl41. F. In 'ID'

Clt.D

00 41. r..t t13tv t.A./ IA 1-, 00 ,14'. N.JC)° 1-4Isj

NJ 1-1 01Ce '''j Lo CO

t.a.) Cr'W 1 ch :-4 Un ko F.'

oiA) unto Lo i_u o I-. i...N 00 1-t 00 w In 1-, In Cl is.) Cl lo in° i.'oj .z.;' im 00 .s. Co ...10 00 b 00 LI 0 00 U.; 0 0 Ur 00 tn In Co CO 0 0:10. 0 i.n 0 0

0Ur00 in

70, 0) 03 m-13 -, C)C3 cr ''' m t3 °. Fri i ; 'O M n r-) n xirD 0 0, 7, 0 0 0 (Co (.74C17 2 f0-1 2 et". -c r-°7 k g g .0 c.n (0.- g 0. 00rD g-r Cl n 0) o. r) Cl n -I (-)

< G. ,,,, a; sO -.rp 0 = 0 0 0.C. I.A. G <. R- CD 7 0 n < 0 = tr, ,?... ., 0_ r =P, . Leg EL CI Ph %I -,-h , _.

_...E' (T1' q .-.. m g ) i -, ,2 , r o g - f_D, 2 F,cc'

*ri CD. 1:1Q"D eb '1 M 2 F"SL 5. .at i 'i LT `.4 (7, -5, s' C' a Eti -. 3 c3 rD cm r' r -ti o 5' ° t. 4

c...z ;) r; ; "0 * 0, ; o c ; 0 rD rD o' , '-' c C. g (1)0 (3 ,.., CD n 0 0- 7 -) 0 op 0 n 0 fp ..-+ Ct) M. n n Do 73 - 0 na 3. oo M _,..7=00) .< 0 7 cu- 0- 17 7 7 Op 3 ro o ,,,,, o- 2 n - 0 n 0 n m ...),° 0 ,- 0-, 0. m m = 0

rD 0 CL O. ro <. 0 rD * r.: no 0 0 0 na 0 A 0 0 00 orD 0 ru rD = (1) 3, (1) 0 ero 0 0. 5' a

o r0 0 * 4 m * 0- §. to-c' §. to .74`. cro"T rDS cyo *. ;.,:* g,w

* 0 .q: cmco ,r..- .7t. A- - 5" co =1, co A."

m * f° 7..,, 5. ebn F -o *E. cb, -0 , fl

-N o_7, o = ;': DT ff 'IQ 5 3 3- ci . Sr 3= '1' * cL = = a'

.-w 3 5 u, 0= m OM ln -0 M S P- -0 C.) OM M P- P SC3a" c ° ir; > ,__ -, .,- c -.< (7) a 5") 9', .." a_ G)3 " Q- 3 co , vo ,:,-, -,. c.) rrocTI: I.S..' > in - F-.5.,a._ o o co o ,t, cm xm 0 3 'CT1 +IF , 0.0 a' = , ,-,. , 0 or, 0- r,cu g co. k" 0 m _0. ro ,0-,)3 a 0, ., - ,,, 0 0 = 2 Ot 5 ,,,,--,. =7. ,°' 8-r, 0. t.,, 0 n Do ..... c 0_ co al r) 3 0 00 3 lf. 0 -% 0 0 CL 0., ,.,M .G 0-, , 0 - 0 < 0) -, ° °: 0 " 0.) - " 0 w ,,, < =Fo 4 co = x3 * ron CL M

-1 00 -rs S CU

NIs< 00 c0./ 7 0 n rt. ,r, -,c

0.. 01 0 01 ro ri," 0 0 IN -, a, °' -o 5 or o a' -'. = 0 to -- CD0 rs/ - 0S 0 .-.. x 0, = , 0 m 0 C0. 0 7 0C0.1 0 ao 3 ..< 7, -< OD II -, n F, 0 <,

CL O '0 FS 0) '0 n0 n v, rt. D., 0- 3' n ° 0ID 0 *--' 5' 5 a° = _ -, 01 = 0) < ; 0100 -h 5 00 rD '2! TD. ra, 0'3C° fl ',+ T.! 0. 0 'f' a 3 .-1.,.. a Pt' -. a co n 00

0- 0 ',. ..... 0 n 0 > n CL * (DC1) rn p - o, a CD 00 ro ro cc, = a al '.1',, D O., aN p D- ai <n 0 M - - 0 0) 7 -N 0 a ; (D IR -, a ;Kos g go n 10, n lo. 0 M n

CI C0 "6-) LA * 1 S' -o.,S NJ 01 00 00_ 0.).'. S' n 0 0 5 - . , o_ O 01. - 5 =0 0, IL'. 01 00 0 D, = CUn tr?-.' 40 -0 -5 X 3 0 R °) 00 ..

cm CL 4 a ....c3 5 op o - a F 07O. 0co n 3. 00 0 ..., '-° < CL S'"': '-° M

0 N alt, ir nn r" 5 ,-, <n) 7 ro , 2,= , -,' oa o" 1 ,-,3

-, - R - , -il)

0 n-, c 0 O. rD -% 7 17, 11) -... , , Xt.' 00 -0 - 'z': ''''' CCD , 0 * M op 0 4 or co o_ OM - N al .... r ,.CLc = or n fl 0 0 - ' in o ro ; cra= 0, 0. =_,

c su 0 ....."- F,o n - .... .....,...- n tu ,,.. t-, -0 t° 7,.In co n c 0 -a: - < = In v, v, n n

rD rD a - oR* = a z = m erg o Z' ori 0 co, 0,35ro< = 0.)

. A ..- to. 5 ..q: < , , oro ,7, -O. -. = 6 00 * (5D a) n CL in a ._. ". 0" 66 op F. ro o a <O o cu = a ,-,- -tm 0, q° '' CD7 n0- 01

_0., 5 (00_ ,-,._.,-.. toa. cr., o_(1,,) g), .7, ,.._ - or, , cro ri. 7-1 .-. . = g Do74;O 7

-1 8 E; S 3 .0(D O0O -, o

7.,: ro z `8.,,,, co o cu R.; a

ro

co o o a 5 3 .7..P.z. m L. 0 a * ° o< c ,-. r. SS CU Y,_, < V,fD = 0' < . '4. -I a, CL 0 CT= 7- .< < ; a 3 CD rt. <-< c s v,

rD ° 01 c , ...-<, S" CL - 00 * ort; ro 3 2,, ° FO = 2 3a'r = Ft." ao t.(.7' 0 5 m < -: a °J 0 CDrm. QV 1.7.

too

= -., 0. <. n ro ro o- rrI 0,c z FPIn < 00 5: (D o, 0 0-* (1) n M 0 7 0) 0 0) 00C 77 0 co or

C 7 Cl * 0 Oa 0- o , mC 17- NJ El: CrCIrD ,fla'

curo a 2 -. 0 0 cr.s z -a,

et) C Ln 7- 0-< 0) < 0)

< corD - 0)n 5 .= a..,, n. , 0.& - < n s p rD o O 0: 5.co CD ... = (3 On 0°- 0 r,011 ct 0rD

"0 Si °.t.'a, 0 7' orr,

.c2 a a ,n00= a -, a u. 3 < '5. 01 I 7n. 0 - n0- 0- in r Co =

..=..-0 CU0 .< In

0-o

co = 3 _ . = 3 0 I'D7 ocD 0 C c ro o m 3 w < ro o 4o r, ro Cl rD n in .<

CD 0 10 0) ., CLM 0 M-I-, n V, I. * W'.< lb = 0- .-1.o -aa C ., ,.,, 0 'C 0 Cl

O , < o (-). ..,co 3' 3 0 ' --o - o) ...< 0 ro to= a 0,3 0 = A_ . r,. -0 5. .< 4-1. - o", 0) Cl-0 7 0 , -. CD n M , .7 o CO n tn

--% .-e = n <, op rD 0 co ori o.. < < 3 g 74. -0.T.JC

P 17 o- 0 L. 3 .....11, a o 0 rDO ri) 0 0cu OA <. 0 0. v, arD < cm n 0 ,-1. 0

O 00: .-.CL00 3 coot, ,- -., 0 n = (D Frj

71 "'I Cl = Cco X=5-

.....00 (7, 0 4 a 0-..., r'T cD 0cro 3 5

la < Z < < ,..tO tb M , ciro

Wco

3

roro

3

77

CD

3O

coCD

OO0)(.0

0

<°_,

oo(-3

p.(1)

aT

CD

5(0

0.Oco

co

(.0CD

OO

c.n

LD0

0VD VNO NJ

00 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0Lt) LO L.0 U3 LO W 00 00 00 CO CO 00 00 03 V V V V V V 'V U1 71 UI 40. 10 A.....-.....-..., .... ..... ...... ..... -.., ..... ...... ..... ...., ..... \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \COCO Co

0 0 00004)4) NJ NJ NJ I-% I-% 1-% 0 0 0 W 1.0 1...) NJ N I-% I-% I-1003000U, to U1 A NN I-1 0 W CO V 1.0 0 0 tO 00 V 1-1 1-1 I-1 tO 00 CO NI...... ...,,, t. -..... ...... ....,,,, ...... .... -.... ....., ..... ...... -..., -...._ ....., ....... ...... -..., ...... ..... ....... ..... -..... ...... ...... .... -., -..... -.... -......A I. n AB 111 VI (.0

I" I" I" I" I" Fl Fl I" Att. Fl 1-%Iv N N./ 1-1 I-% 1-1 I-% I-% I-% I-1 1-% I-1 1-3 I-% 1-. )-..IL) NJ NJ NI NJ NJ NJ NI 14 N.3 N N N.) NJ N NJ N) NJ N IV N 14 IV N NJ N 1.1

lo. K v, IArf I.) rm Y,' -;*1 :5 X' P, K K u" -1n 0--144838ZiT`fi'ri g. -, -, n n COtto %12 ;I 51 2-1 .`-", E -;-1-, 0 .0 5.00,3;00 000 o 0 < . 0., . (-1 o 0) 03 4< a. a_ o o o g' Cr,' otv z t.p, g, 4-t 3, 3 r 3. =. .-A7 ,g7 g. p, g.F.F.Erm Fr, Fb-9 m m 3 3 3 m 6 3, -

13) en .?' rP1/4- 8 3 R- Pr ..- r Zr 0 0 ? 3 3 3 3 3 3 In 6 6 6 P a 6z,- m o - p p...000n0000 71 71N ?t ', ? ?q ?q PPP ' PPP', P P P !-- -5 p § nrn Por): § § §

c§

o 1-1W LI)0

4)

0 0P9!"Pr'49'6' 0 E 0 '8 8

0 0 0 N N N 171 0 0 0 0 0 I-% I-% !Xi L..1 A 4) N O NJ ac c c C C D

w nC

OC C D C C C C C 0 b

CD 0

IA 1/1 IJ1 tf% IA In In Vt 4/1 IA in I.A 41 IA ill to1 41 IA IA 41 4/1 i./1 IA. VO tn. 411 IA IA tn Ift V% 41-01 01 01 01 00 01 V CO 01 01 01 01 01 V V CO CO CO UI 00 00 CO V VI in V V V 01 A. V.71 A 0 A 0 A. NJ VI A A A A A NJ N U1 UI VI W I.11 to VI NO 01 01 NJ NJ NJ 0 CO IV0 F, 00 F+ V I-1 01 CD U. /..& 1-& F. 1-1 5A 5A CD 50 0 NJ C) C) CD cr, VI UI 01 01 01 CO LO 0114 NJ 0 NJ in i4 V NJ i4 iv NJ NJ it) V V b i..1 N.) kt b is., NJ N.) ;...1 is.) NJ V t..1 L.1 b N VVI 1 0 Ul 0 to in to 4.1 41 41 ul LII VI Ln 0 UI UI UI 0 to LtI In VI VI 1.11 VI VI 171 0 to to

1A IA tro 1/1 4/1 LI. V% IA 41. 41 41 IA In 1.11 In LA IA IA IA IA Int IA V% I/1 1./1 ift V1 IA 41 IA tV1 tov, Co N to Vi V) NJ I-% N3 NJ to N3 I 2-, OD I-1 A 01 I-% A U1 1-1 1-1 410 NJ SO N) -1 .4.3 -1 4)IJI i-% COIW 43 CU I-' 01 00 1_, LII 1..) 1.11 VI le 4-nt., .1-10 FINJ 233 n!.0 !. ni. . j i "p 01 . .Ii R 00 0 owocrii-1Lt) ..4 Lol VI .10 0.. VI 4,,, 01 CA UJ 01 10 0 0.0 (.11 NJ I-% A NJ 1.13kr On I-% 0 NJ V ts.) o cri id, in b in 00 V N Ve I NJ 01 I-% I- 0 V IA I-1 Nt w ...1 00 1 VL3) LU N.) 00 in 41 ix, 0 b., 0 0 0 0 b0 4,,, 0 4., 4) 0 0 W Vi 6., :1,. cn LO 01 :13. 0 NJ CI0 0 4) UI to 1.%) 0 IJI LIJ IA IJI 0 VI 0 50 0

-0 9*:13

?' 3- (3-ro

-o 0m 3 -, m o

a) G' 0 co.. ° 2 R.rn

0- cr 7C

t..)

3C." < 3<M 0 fp

CM 0NJ i

mn 3-SA

-, ills., no >nmp"<nnnn nm -9rnm>sKm cv nr, en c-1 < CV IV K CL 1/1 D< < -0 -0 Mo_.0 M003 ,00-fp <OSO °Pell con 0_ 0. 0 0 0 0 <.. 0 -, 0 -, ue 0 -,4. ,- fp 5. 5 = m," 3 74: s 9, aw = 4..5C ,= m: w .o ro O. - .,0 3 "3 g cl. ,° 3. ';') 3 nt .9 ..c.1 m° ,c3 cla0 3 ,, CD no"' * 7 Ftr 03 M A- ni- 3 3' m- 3 it ...,- to. ...,. -g * 3Ft; 2 ..M 3 co - G) ° ce) ..Z A- A- CU 1,6 9, * A: t -1 0 * 0 - 13 -1 7 -, 0 m o 0 m, , o r, " rri 0 ill ° 511) 3S)110

AAfp 0 0 Fij Fd co039m * = 0 * CL 0_ 0 * o' * z * 3, 3 .t '0 0 Z 0 Z , 0 0 Z 0 -t -10 -.4 -5 -n -1-,..o0-- 0 000e4 03=0"n-nt3.= 't m0- 0 o q .4. .-1. " =1. wt.° =, 5D -St= on 0 0 -.no oo omoo otlo.c.m= ,..t.n o = n g < rt,

M CM ,I m 3 IA c, m 0./ 3 8. , 1 -0 zIn 13o o o '.1 5* to c.,- 93 ' 3 7; 92 03 * r * on 0 on 0 m co o o * cL * 3 C - 3, 00 0 03 ° ' 8 < in 3 0. 0) IT fD 7 i'D 3OM 0 0.-o 0 q" - -Nan ° 7Ds " 'W 7173 3 3 CL

7 n .5 < a a .03 8 740, a 3y1 L,,c!' 3- ......`" 5... 9 g ,-° - 5 ,0 3- !n - n3 va .3 9'3 ,5 ' 3° ng gr 7; 3{4' Fe7 ....".5- agb .00,1 2° 8.-,3 11 .. I : ."a m 0 ,0,,,0,0,m, 0 , 0 m 7,1 0 CL DJ

f D t -o -0-o '0 - 3 7 , CU .4 0 3 -att = el -lt 0. Ln -. 0 ,.1,0 M n 2 0 - (1)0 -. 20 4,t 1 § ._0- g ort3 mc L 703 kb .28. 7,3- -Ps O'''' n3 84 - -3 03 g a i. -C. 0 rta) - a) 0a) m5 52° ci,r+ It !,

,-- ri ,-- 0_1) g ma) tb= 57 33: .-oZ org 5.4.- 3 o & 7 3 0 ....,3 °- GI a L -CL °.° cK1

-, In t-lt... ° 3 3 3 n' -A ,`-',' 011 ID c to " - ., el - 0 ce' 0 0., , fp 0 in °0 527 a 13- _a. 5 ") ,,_cb ri aw ba a," g 8 3'sm m° 02' g t1/4-- i 8 -54 8. -')

0N9 ' 14

001 : 1-

0r 1-1'

. m

3 -m13 47 o co

-tc. 3 ,._.,. on ..,. 3 on 7,1 tra o fD2m 00,-003 60.

Irt,

.-, o- o . < 8=rligr 5. it; 5 a. n ig " 0 cm' ':'' o' vo 3 on 8 = r...

5 4. E. q Joo°09, 3640. ea o'o-ffi a _. CU fp 3 3 rof D 0,3. 7.2 ,, 0

0- -` 03 01 011 °: ;, c-,'= 5 ... .-/. - 3 o .0 001 -,, 0 n CL n = , 03 -, 7. * 3q cu 0 to,

3 -1 -,0 O. 5ocra go o o .-, ....c.- a = ,,,, 07.- 0 1 Q:7 2'" -; 8O.

7 74 ' a) 0: icri (9 . ' m- 41 0m 0 0 0 ,-. 12_ 0° 3 00 3 °et 0- at n , ,.., 5 5 5. -, -, K ' Ft;a) CL 3 0 g 0 00 n 1-- , 0 0 -CI ' 12 0I'D fD M 7 cra ,

'2. 5' ' = 2 0, 0 °I' ;'--s 5 -.. 0. ~to -'-,3 c 0 2: 3 n - - - oem300a ER .? 0-lg 3 3 a -0 0 0, ct 5 011 0 CLm 5 m 0 3 cfg a) G 3 r, o Er Ci P2- i:: 4!0 m M 0 .z.. 7 a) a) 0 cri 3 3 17 0.--0 , , 3 13 a) 0 en13 0-00c <

L 5 n 0 00 0 107 7- ---. AL 7 -a r ; 13) go fl -7, -0 . '0 3S 0 3 n. 9 CD 3 0 0'4. e:11.Z '0 0 M m .01 12. G' )" 5' 5. an ro - nCL O. 3 0 -t. v1 01 8 7 7 onc -r -m Ell co Ern C)0 0

IZ/ 0 ao in fp 0 O. -, 0 0 r, co 0

a. 7C 3n , 0- UJ 00 -. :--- r, 3 0 3 in .7 3 o ....m co-, 0., 0. 3 ...: - IA (51' 3(1)5 0 o o g ; gi a a t) 0 -0 ise '0 n 0) 0 , 0 °- L-/ a." 0N. a:- 3 to 0-6' 40 - C - 03' r) .-. ril cVI ,3 0 3 el

3 3 g' G. 7- 7 7 - 0 - FS 0 .fli tn cm - ro 0 oe0 F,' a) - 0, 0 '' 0 IA tn a, m OD 33 -., 0. ^ 0C.1. CL ED- M CD < 7- CLor 7 m, CL . u7 0 .c.b

_. 5 c .-, (1)3- In 2 0 C -0 13 0, n 3 71 c.] a m m0 f D -0 a = 34 a) ,r). A: ..cm , 0 j" m 9, ., c c m 6 a. , ... to a)m 3 0- ,

M3 0 c o .-4 $' 1, ,,,' 0 7 33

7 f D 0 C t- 0 -t K a-10) c5 07 33 EL

ona .0 0. in n Cr

co 1.I. M.- m 1-1. C n n M 70- 5 cli ro 0 ro o Q. .-1 Kgnt A. ri co ul. ,-, o

o. 0. 3 2 . 0mt. K MI7 ri° eb O) 16 .-1. -1 1:4 0 0 In sr tol 03 01m g,, LO 3 '7. a) M 0 n -0 0 ff.. 0n c M.' F.) 3 3: 3 °'0co c Vo W < ....`" 3 C a) z ..8 .3 3 se u,- ,T, 3 3 0: , 00, cT) o zin M ,,, att 17fc. 3 to 0e-lt 0.1 01 Z Z in n at , a §co m 0 0 ,-, o mvt

5-

Ot -e

to

CDto0to

3to

O

CD

le30C

'"el)

1

1

wO I-0 0 0

0 0NJ NJU1 LA

W

91 171U1 NJ0 0

1-1 I-) 1-10 0 0NJ

436NJ

WNJv./-3LU W

lu0 0 NJ

if3V V V03 03 NJ

UJ,4 bVi0

4.6 N N 1/1. N .1./4 .413.

tp 0 -004). .0. )x. 0WILICO LO N+ COCOOD° 1.34 1.0 ° 00Ico coo 0

0 22 12 ,..-, 73 CZ1

Cr *in

CL * Cr.7. -i.M 0 SIC S) M,0 C

-1-i , .. 0M - C 0 MDIr4

pp 0 S (A m D7g0.1 0 (D '11.

a 5 e g ow O.s -g

,^ (1) 50, -s ;o "3' 0,3

0,0 0

w,..

l c.

,.-1.

OS 0.." ,=

inz -c (07 1." 5' , 0

.,..".. ED, 0n 0., .4. ° g.0 0 ,3 on

ci,.,)' 0 ro 0Go m - ,.., alC in ° ITI: cco Ca M

CD el)-1 7 -1 , 71

Z11 a 2, no-0. 5. -, 5 . t:I.0(7 in

c0 141 p nc o 5 co ca. -3 a to 0 0

._ co0 0 0..... 7 g5 ,7,PN

coM50 5

coM 0N01 00 -co

2. -co05 oo0la 50 0a

-0o no7, o

rogo,

ro0co_

-13anc fpr,CD -IIn CD

3 .117w

5 2

0VI0

ONJLU

cto

3-co.

0(NJO

a0

O

I" I" NA ,-, 1-,0000 o...... -..., .... ....8 8 8 8 a..... ......,... ......

UJ Li4 W 1.33 U4

I-) NJ V NJ

Ob.o a0

00)

O

in N V/ 1.0 L/3

A00 CO 01lc UJ00

vl NJ NJ IJ1.0 U1 U1 UI

W I11 N !"'

O

L/1. .1.0 tn. (A ina, 1-

.PJvl 01 W

Ul N 4O. NJ

00Ulrs.s91 in

coLs 0in

Qft o 0

<. '17 VD' n° I'D

0. IT) M .0 fp m* 0 n fp g a a4, GI 0 0. =

or" C's-, on 0, a. -, 0- nm -L El o. 2 52 g

= a "D0 n 0n cr 0rts 0 g cy, c

cr c ao rt,a. DrwCD 0 n CP o"^n ° o on o * m rsrs3c

ao 3 0. fo gC c Or r1')M.

= 0 in3 a. o0 0 ,°)o o o.

CLa. nn oP 5 siT3 m o0 cn DO c2.

3

CD

co00

0

ft1

DICa

.= on .... 0_ tift.< 0 5:

t±..DO "10 < p., -0 .

-41 15. 0. tu FCr (0 CL n -1Cu -i coc .-3 m 0n- 170 te,,. 0 0ru Q oo ,

oCA"0- w3O'''-, s CA -0

7 fO cu) ,co 44

Z0-

m-,

rap 0-0

=-;.-..:

O 0 nc3- E

o 00co" tu o.S A!CL .ro .0/1) 3 0to 0,3 co: ns' 7.: c0

...<,

As.7 s.0C1.A(A

43).

L.1

0O

1-2%

00

croLrifr

0

ootoLro

O

s 8 8NJ NJ NJ NJ0 ID 03 V V

1-1 I-1 I-1W 0.1 W W UJ

1'toD 03 fDco co K 03

CD

:- 4- . ...-' L.

93

0P. NI 1.//

O 8 8 8

VT

01

N ill ill 1.11. ill1.j... ..

inIAI t o.o.oj -/'.'

W 0I, NJ 114 W ALO A A i.0 LO

W1-) N.) ow 0 coto OWo

0 g 3 0`..0 o m=

(pM19-o 0 - o-g ,..

-ro -, <

xrno- <o r) a ,- Cu 0). 0 mCU 7' m -. 0m= P o- m< w c7o0 7'1 tj co -, o-s 0 , ID 0 0 CI._ 0 0) 0_ -1...

CI) 7 3 3 = 7 B. g,

C- j s71' '' C IT

7"3 -

'7co_ fp 3 V 0rr 0n m- mi-c3 cr C

M . 133 0- fp

3 o- o oo .m, ..3 M to 3m m o a 0-. * -,, to - Z MM Z'Z. M %' .{; 2 o,,, A. 0_ ;4

5 '0 w o, 3. , =3 o .= ...i.

pTp. °- fp o- 0 0° 8 * to cto ID07 0 in co -0 So

0- --As 5 -. _. (D

co 0a

co

a3 COD

-, .-1. 0 c, Mo = - e+ 0

S. .4, g no .Net

n O'CI 0 ,5 co 0- ..p.. a -,0- 7 m ,c 0m co_

.0 cco_eD 0I=nfn cot'l.10 0.-, m c .-o -0 0N ..) < 07 3 7 n 't2 on00 0. -,o7." a;

oo0o a-I

co._

1

w2 = °° c2 -w e - am

'II-...

mn3

v, 7 0 0) 5.n (D 0. CIO 700_

no 2 = 0 n zFr 0 °7 7. < 3cis).

0, 1' 2, m. oz

no0_< 3

w..,5 0-0

.= ro 5' aviO m =

0

O

0 Ero-m3 a rom

7-7 EU 3 2

rim"

ao

0)

0-0

0

0

0 0tD 1.15

IV NJV 011-1LU

0 0

N.!jjW

W 0N.3144

w

Olto

CoOD

,:, - -rs tA xi rn In 0rt, ID 0 m 0. C -,< CU -0 < e -ti: -0 0.1G' w- LL_(p 0.3 N (p CD --p- 0 ,3 ti fil 3 3 s.' 3 eoo .... coo 0 0 - oo. co. 0. 5 O N5 5o A :y-, 0 z z= - c a

5'5 2`" `;' ro' 5 0tc, g. 0 0 o -0cto 0 ..--.. 1,3 3 18

E__ -13 g a ° ,,,;- 0 - 0 5'3 t", 0 0 00 7.: 4/. 0 00 0 03 0 cp-. 77 7 NIN _. a _ c 01303 0 00 -10 0 al a: -1.N5 p.,.

In pp0 30toom oo .=-oo NA -..0 5'R 8" 1. E o'i ..,0 , ,-. f'D 0... IA -N 0 nCL co 0 inm 7 n in COL C0p...... . -00. 5. .1:. -43 2 ID

3 0 (17 3 11)0 '' TTI 3 2 m.

,:... . ,-,0 (f)7 0 0. vii .7i7

M CL -0 .-1. 01 03

t; CI. 8 0, 00 cl. 0.0

v, n Ct. O.C C C13 p7 n co ,' o--oo , g) c- ,-) a,

a, <a, n, < a,- 7..!3 5 c3 3 3no = ....... -0 ,.-s. (As 1-1 ninCO

3(D n b nx , ° 9,3m to 14)

& 0. in7./: 3 a 00 o.

0. 000 ',- ci0

a 3 c "-

Oro

3ro

Aco

3CO

O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0I-. I-. I-. 1-, I. I-.

00 00 VAP IV tvV a, 4. 4. AIs.) A A A W W NI Al r...)1,) ra NJ 1).)

ND Is.) IVNI CV1,)

I-:e).)N v.

1-1 I-) I-) I- I-) N i-) 1- N N 0-) N I-) IAA IAA I" IAA I" N I" I" I" I" I-% I-' N I-' I -sA 41A .0A .10 40 40 A A A A 40 A A A .0. 40 Sa. R. A 40 A A 40 A 40 A UP 1,14 W

x x0011

3 3 30' 0" CrC C C

CDa aCD CD CD

.7 .7) .7)

Fc'W Fo

0- = 0- 0*O u 0 0 0 03 5

.3 3 3 5

to F, r.,.

PO F0 6

P0 .?%-

P* * *.

3: :cC 3° Er

43' adv14

00

v, g,n 0 0- to0030603 5: RD- 3 :.< c.n0 pc 7n 0 .3 A -

?C

0 0 I-) CO Is..) A.4 N r P P t-) 4o. co co r N L-) A P P !-` P V I"bo iv i-, io w in LID U.) N I-) CO it) V A 0 In W A A cn 0 Cr.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

in Ut in trt in in in. In in in to in in 113 in tn. IA tn. in in ift in tn 4J in in in in in.ON 01 ON CO ,J 00 00 00 V Cr) m a) a) o) 00 ....1 1.0 CO ID -.I al al al al a) ma -4 cn cnI-. a-) 1-.) m cr) a) cn al a) i- 1.... I-. I-) 1-. mcni-)cramo) 1.-) 1- is I-) I-) 1...1 NJ ln 1.0s4 :41 A A A 40 .10 A V V

..--J :""/ "'"I A 40 ON A ).0 .0. V V .....1 V :..)V ."8 ' 2 00

0 nC C iVn

n n 0 LV Cn 0 C D

nul

V 0 0 .0C

n 0 C D0

uVl c.al

ii/. i" al VI. V/ 111. ill. 4/1. ill 4/1 N. 4./1. in 1./1. in in in tn in in in in in in. in in in in 'Cl'.1-s W i-: 4-4 t.) J." °. e !"n e e i-) I -P ),-) zra ga at 1- o.) I" IV AI NI UP 01 W Y1 e P'3.) 0 , 0 I-) V 40 01 Ul al I-) CO IM i).)87) M. 4PI V I" V CA ND 034.1 CO ..I cal co ix, V vl 0 vl 00 V A C) e I-) I-) A VI UJ COin :.; tka

03 40 01 0 A OD00 I-) C/1 00 00 uI 1,,,, io io io in M in i-..) cn 0 :..4 En o4 W Lo :o. i-. i..) c) ° 0 0 0 in :to. VVI 0 0 Pc) VI U1 CO 0 LA cn 0 03 V 0 La U10 0 1.0

C)to 3- 33 * * * ,11 7e, * N Fo' X' ,.°: 3 11) " * * nr) -1> ,A33 * ; ; FO °- v" °- ' -5. ? M-- n CA' M -%71 0 MI-1 en <. 9, 9, 9, .q: < 0 (n.c0.60.3n 0 9, 5 E., o 07 u, 6,, tA, 0 r., <. _. 3 2co cm A- A- A- 0. 5* ...` M <04 F 0 OD fpal CD t.., P) 0)

-% 0 cn 3 - -, In r us * -. = CDR- Pr cr Z 13. ;- Et, co co c 0 c (1) 2. a) 0.0 g -1 0''' * 0 0- A -0'

,,,'" 1-7' vi (0 01=403*0 ,.. = 0 0- 0- .1' W- °I 2 DA- n 0 A-0 0.00 7 7 7 g.. 0, = 0 -- 0 0 .. S. a

-cs ..)0 0 0_ 0 7-0 0 37 * 2--) 0. -on -10 ?, ;71: -., ,o, a,' mg 0° 0,-_ ,,,m 00 .0) ,-.;.... 0. =0) 0. 30 5 a--o -o -, -o 0 0.) 0 -8 3- 0 , ,.,

O 0 in 10 0 -0 0 4, o., tn In N, 0- A4 _.,.. 3 pq..^ ''' - Si g'_. 2 ii,3 0 X 0 X. Cl,, 0

in r...,0 .6.1 -I..

*-4 0 * crw 05 0 ", a8 0'i 63. u° 0.= 0 : 3 .. Da 7aT 0 --. tr, Vma c3,-.. =. * 0 m = -,0 = v -0 ° o ° 10 ,-.. 0-ta o AP S''

a) , 3 m, Cl 2 vi Er ,,, ,,,,,,, s, g_

6 3° = o . ...; o,.... 0 " . .. 3 7 0 Fi 3.. 30M 0.-*0.Ii'&' ''' a - -c 3.,..o....05crtizEr..0

ICD Otr.06* 5 Lo o A- o a, 3 3 - o o -... 10 0 - "'' - ' 0_ .-0 0 0 °: o 0 , 0 = 0 m . a.... ,_, cl, 7 CO : 7O 0 0 ,.. ,I. r, 0 0 0 -0 0

3 7 Is, RI Is0 3 Stol b- 0 I-.. TO ..- p 0 ..- " 0' 5-1 a ,4,

3 12 a '',... g. ,V; g 0 3 ' ' ' 41'

N III cri ogt 3 O. 3 ° ° us 74DPI 00 al 5 g 5 '2- g 0 a CD 01:1 -% 0 3 3 G. gYe ,... (D

OD m. -) 0, -. M W 3 0 CULI,' 'A " o 0 0 0, 0 cu 0/ to <7 ° 7 7 y., -1- sis = =

'A 00 N.9.0g,7-<33 .74

c: 6070 3 3 5,' ° g gl o m v., ,-,,,3 IALA

LA c" N e't - N0 -' 0 ". 0 "

CIO 0 0 MI 7 C :a 0 7) . :1. 9, 0 sC , 0 co 0 ro cm cr c 0° ro6.. a- :=.o - CID Cr ar. .g a. o 3 c '" r, - 0 - E. -E-.E:i.. _....,

s..Z O.a a i 3 g, g g. 37, .pi 6- - 0 =- aco 1

e ol -0 ut D 0 0 1-9. ,vr 4.,,- 7, In0 0- ra. 10. .-1. 071 c O. 0- 0, 3 a a tr. In ).7) P' C. al 2 3 gEc prpo (42:5: -F.,,. m0 r 3 o 0:0.. co ° 0 0 1, -). m m 2 6 rei f ',,.!,, c; a7, ... 3

Cu rli n. ;4 0 3 = 0 0 g3 iti eitCL ,).0

IA et.co o 4. -, m 0 )

...h I

a. 3 'A. .- r.7; M 3 3 33 0u, c =I- 07

CI 1.7)CI CO .E. :2- 0 20. 7- a ° al Co cm0 0 o ca.o. ...-,..3 m 3

=,.' '^ ca. F.4. ri,...3' g g g g 5 OP 3IcS 7,. N ft. (30 ; 0 0 0 Fp

m tik F. ro ,... 3 '4 c - 0. oi-, -. ,t .0 nOci 2 - 0 -- 5 ='1

" " 3 7 0 Da

3 c- - a , == CD g 12 -,, 3 8 3 2,,,:.a 8'. 5-0 . co 5 cl. . a o CI c), c', 51 -'

EA ' ii.

=.-.

-., = 0 n In

2, g ' '' 2,07 -< 5'

..4. .... LA IA SA a3 g a * 0 3 cr a 2 3 3 3

09 3 G 0 Ott 0 5. in L71' IA . F3 Pt ar. . at 0c. 'To' 5' ,.... 0 LA LA I.A

'6' 0 c3--(-- al °- g rp .2 ' 3 o ..L.° '/'

g7t. 0 IA M a E * IN.... 3 LA tAt

137 Pe PI: OTA.

0 " 3 0. co 8 5 -.= aU tr 1. CD

.E ck ° a 5.t71 pt 3- 3- to

-1.a. 97 .-.

0- CD 073. ca :- *H 3 LA .

on

mii:- cf' CD CM 3 `" 2 -, n Ln to:

3, 3. c g c'.T. 3 5 G. 3 *E ..,, t71. .0. D. 0 0

.-% 0, ti) 0 Cr.

* n= 7n * 2, `3' -.'" f.,,7 g 2 1_... ..,.. a pc

7M < 3 .3 0.), m 0 In 0%, EL0 S g

7:4 toto' 00 -,-o i..) 3 so0 ci, 'At 7.11.=

00c h5 oo 5na =

.o. CPNJ

< mocgE 2 -2PrO

13

W.0 5.3 iga) O. U.

7 n-.0

-8 0,, (7, 30

CDA O.3 BP

a >3 3 G)6 O'

01

5

O4-17

Aoly 0 a ".S. 0fa

0.74 .=1.

=-o-es

3 mO - 0". D. 0 Cl'

O C 77 (1) .3*

30.10- 0 0. 0fl) In 5

tnCD ct

OJ

9-7

0 to01

000)

ooCD

0

CDCD

3

0

V)

".%

co

CD

01

01

O0.1

3

to

CD

3rD

0)

CDD

cr.

3OC

A.)(C)

C')

OCDCS)(017"r-7

- n

3-

00C-)

F.00

cro

nro

0tarn

CDO

0-)

00

CD

CoCfl

Ul

EXHIBIT K

Case 18 -11780 -BLS Doc 1129 Filed 03/18/19 Page 1 of 20

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

In re: Chapter 11

BROOKSTONE HOLDINGS CORP., et al.,' Case No. 18-11780 (BLS)

Debtors. Jointly Administered

Ref. Docket No. 1127

SUPPLEMENT TO SECOND INTERIM FEE APPLICATION OFGIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP ("Gibson Dunn" or the "Firm"), counsel to Brookstone

Holdings Corp. and its affiliated debtors and debtors -in -possession in the above -captioned

chapter 11 cases (collectively, the "Debtors"), hereby supplements the Second Interim Fee

Application of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP [Docket No. 1127 (the "Second Interim

Application") for the period from November 1, 2018 through January 31, 2019 (the "Application

Period") by attaching, as Exhibits A through E hereto, certain schedules requested by the Appendix

B Guidelines for Reviewing Applications for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed

Under United States Code by Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases (the "UST Guidelines"). In

addition, Gibson Dunn respectfully states as follows to address the questions set forth under section

C.5 of the UST Guidelines:

UST Guidelines C.5(b): Did you agree to any variation from, or alternatives to, your standard

or customary billing rates, fees or terms for services pertaining to

1 The Debtors, along with the last four digits of each Debtor's tax identification number, are: Brookstone HoldingsCorp. (4638), Brookstone, Inc. (2895), Brookstone Company, Inc. (3478), Brookstone Retail Puerto Rico, Inc.(5552), Brookstone International Holdings, Inc. (8382), Brookstone Purchasing, Inc. (2514), Brookstone Stores,Inc. (2513), Big Blue Audio LLC (N/A), Brookstone Holdings, Inc. (2515), and Brookstone Properties, Inc. (2517).The Debtors' corporate headquarters and the mailing address for each Debtor is One Innovation Way, Merrimack,NH 03054.

103207145.1

Case 18 -11780 -BLS Doc 1129 Filed 03/18/19 Page 6 of 20

Gibson Dunn's hourly rates for bankruptcy services are comparable to the hourly rates charged incomplex chapter 11 cases by comparably skilled bankruptcy attorneys. In addition, Gibson Dunn'shourly rates for bankruptcy services are comparable to the rates charged by Gibson Dunn, and bycomparably skilled practitioners in other firms, for complex corporate and litigation matters,whether in court or otherwise, regardless of whether a fee application is required. By way ofexample, Gibson Dunn's blended hourly rates for attorneys and paraprofessionals for allBankruptcy and Corporate Restructuring matters of Gibson Dunn for the prior calendar year wereas set forth below. Gibson Dunn believes that the services performed for the Debtors arecomparable to the services performed by the firm for all Bankruptcy and Corporate Restructuringmatters during the prior calendar year. Also included below is blended hourly rate information forall sections of Gibson Dunn for which Gibson Dunn represented a client in a matter other than anin -court bankruptcy proceeding during the prior calendar year.'

Category ofTimekeeper

Blended Hourly Rate

BilledFirm -wide non-bankruptcy and

restructuring practiceareas for precedingcalendar year2 ($)

BilledFirm -wide

bankruptcy andrestructuring matters

for precedingcalendar year3 ($)

BilledThis Application

November 1, 2018through

January 31, 2019 ($)

Partner 1,117 1,071 1021Counsel 870 896 935Associate 710 685 805Paralegal 399 427 429

Aggregated: 820 835 896

While Gibson Dunn used reasonable efforts to separate Bankruptcy and Restructuring matters from otherpractice group matters, it is possible that there is some overlap between these practice groups and the billings reportedherein.2 This column reflects the blended rates charged by the firm for all matters excluding Bankruptcy andCorporate restructuring matters during the prior calendar year.3 This column reflects the blended rates charge by the firm for all Bankruptcy and Corporate Restructuringmatters during the prior calendar year.

2103207145.1

Case 18 -11780 -BLS Doc 1129 Filed 03/18/19 Page 8 of 20

Title

,

DepaDate of

issioilip

2018HourlyBillingRate (8)

2019HourlyBilling

Rate (8)

Total BilledHours for

thisApplication

Period

Fees Billed inthe

Application.Period (SIM

i Karlan, Mitchell Partner Litigation 1980 1415 1495 12.00 17,500.002. Feldman, David Partner Corporate 1994 1260 1345 2.20 2,772.00

3. Rosenauer, David Partner Tax 1993 1260 1345 10.60 13,356.004. Winter, Graham Partner Corporate 1990 1260 1345 0.60 756.00s. Williams, Matt Partner Bankruptcy 1999 1215 1285 49.70 61,176.506. Collins, Michael Partner Litigation 2005 1205 1265 2.60 3,157.007. Hoffman, Matthew Partner Corporate 2003 1155 1195 3.50 4,042.50s. Kelsey, Matthew K. Partner Bankruptcy 2004 1085 1115 133.20 145,419.009. Leroy, Carrie Partner Litigation 2000 1025 1075 4.20 4,305.00io. Martorana, Keith Partner Bankruptcy 2008 935 1095 331.40 325,523.00ii. Vojtisek, John -Paul Of Counsel Corporate 2006 935 995 26.50 24,843.5012. Fortney, Jonathan Associate Litigation 2010 925 975 24.50 23,447.5013. Goldstein, Jason Associate Bankruptcy 2013 885 945 400.90 362,788.50H. Weiner, Genevieve Associate Bankruptcy 2007 875 915 28.30 25,138.50is. Riddick, Tarana Associate Litigation 2015 815 895 30.40 27,208.0016. Bouslog, Matthew Associate Bankruptcy 2011 840 900 1.00 840.0017. Solow, Ryan Associate Corporate 2011 840 900 0.30 252.0018. Cassidy, Dylan S. Associate Corporate 2016 755 850 173.10 135,526.0019. Park, Jean Associate Corporate 2014 720 815 3.00 2,160.0020. Schmeltz, Brittany Associate Corporate 2016 595 695 2.30 1,368.5021. Bernstein, Andrew Associate Corporate 2016 615 725 16.30 11,080.5022. Hammond, Tyler A. Associate Corporate 545 625 85.00 48,373.0023. Ogowewo, Imole Paralegal Corporate 495 515 0.50 247.5024. Kann, Stephanie Paralegal Corporate 470 490 4.80 2,256.0025. Amponsah, Duke Paralegal Bankruptcy 440 460 17.20 7,634.0026. Santos, Pamela Paralegal Bankruptcy 420 435 61.30 26,049.00

103207145.1

Case 18 -11780 -BLS Doc 1129 Filed 03/18/19 Page 9 of 20

fiE. Name Title DepartmentDate of

Admission

2018HourlyBillingRate ($)

2019HourlyBillingRate ($)

Total BilledHours for

thisApplication

Period

Fees Billed inthe

ApplicationPeriod ($)

27. Yang, Eric Paralegal Corporate 395 0.20 79.00

Total 1,425.60 I 1,277,298.50

*NY State Bar number pending; not currently licensed to practice in the State of New York.

2103207145.1

Case 18 -11780 -BLS Doc 1129 Filed 03/18/19 Page 14 of 20

PROFESSIONAL

POSITION OF PROFESSIONAL;NUMBER OF YEARS IN THAT POSITION;

YEAR OBTAINING LICENSE TO PRACTICE, IFAPPLICABLE

Karlan, Mitchell Partner since 1989. Joined the firm as an Associate in1984. Member of the D.C. Bar since 2005; NY bar since1980.Primary practice area: General Commercial Litigation

Feldman, David Partner. Joined firm as a Partner in 2008. Member ofNY Bar since 1994.Primary practice area: Business Restructuring &Reorganization

Rosenauer, David Partner. Joined firm as an Associate in 1987. Member ofNY Bar since 1993.Primary practice area: Tax

Winter, Graham Partner. Joined firm as a Partner in 2011. Licensed topractice law in Hong Kong since 2016; United Kingdomsince 1990.Primary practice area: Capital Markets; Mergers andAcquisitions; Private Equity; Securities Regulation andCorporate Governance

Williams, Matt Partner. Joined the firm as a Partner in 2008. Member ofNY Bar since 1999.Primary practice area: Business Restructuring andReorganization

Collins, Michael Partner since 2007. Joined firm as an Associate in 2000.Member of D.C. Bar since 2004.Primary practice area: Executive Compensation andEmployee Benefits

Hoffman, Matthew Partner since 2012. Joined Firm as an Associate in 2003.Member of CA Bar since 2003.Primary practice area: Insurance

Kelsey, Matthew K. Partner since 2013. Joined Firm as an Of Counsel in 2008.Member of NY Bar since 2004.Primary practice area: Business Restructuring &Reorganization

Leroy, Carrie Partner since 2018 Joined Firm as a Partner in 2018.Member of CA Bar since 2000.Primary practice area: Intellectual Property

Martorana, Keith Of Counsel. Joined the firm as an Associate in 2008.Member of the NY and NJ Bars since 2008.

Vojtisek, John -Paul Of Counsel. Joined the firm as an Associate in 2005.Member of the NY Bar since 2006.

Fortney, Jonathan Associate. Joined the Firm as an Associate in 2009.Member of NY Bar since 2010.

4103207145.1

Case 18 -11780 -BLS Doc 1129 Filed 03/18/19 Page 15 of 20

PROFESSIONAL

POSITION OF PROFESSIONAL;NUMBER OF YEARS IN THAT POSITION;

YEAR OBTAINING LICENSE TO PRACTICE, IFAPPLICABLE

Goldstein, Jason Associate. Joined the firm as an Associate in 2016.Member of the NY Bar since 2013.

Weiner, Genevieve Associate. Joined the Firm as an Associate in 2007.Member of CA Bar since 2007.

Riddick, Tarana Associate. Joined the Firm as an Associate in 2014.Member of NY Bar since 2015.

Bouslog, Matthew Associate. Joined firm as an Associate in 2012. Memberof CA Bar since 2011.

Solow, Ryan Associate. Joined the firm as an Associate in 2015.Member of CA Bar since 2015; IL Bar since 2011.

Cassidy, Dylan S. Associate. Joined the Firm as an Associate in 2015.Member of NY Bar since 2016.

Park, Jean Associate. Joined the firm as an Associate in 2014.Member of CA Bar since 2014.

Schmeltz, Brittany Associate. Joined the firm as an associate in 2016.Member of CA Bar since 2016.

Bernstein, Andrew Associate. Joined the firm as an Associate in 2018.Member of NY Bar since 2018.

Hammond, Tyler A.* Associate. Joined the Firm as an Associate in 2018.*NY State Bar number pending; not currently licensed topractice in the State of New York.

Ogowewo, Imole ParalegalKann, Stephanie ParalegalAmponsah, Duke ParalegalSantos, Pamela ParalegalYang, Eric Paralegal

5103207145.1

EXHIBIT L

Client ID: Pico Neighborhood Assn, et al.

Matter ID: City of Santa Monica

01-01-2015 - 02-13-2019

Attorney Time Detail

Date Attorney Task Hours

6/25/15 KIS Discussion with C. Foster re: 0. de Ia Torre, Pico Youth Center,and desire to bring district elections to Santa Monica; quickresearch regarding CVRA applicablility.

3.4

6/26/15 KIS Telephone conversation with 0. de la Torre; further researchissues raised by 0. de Ia Torre.

4.9

6/30/15 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de Ia Torre and M. Loyaregarding potential case against City of Santa Monica underthe California Voting Rights Act of 2001.

5.9

7/1/15 KIS Discuss potential case against Santa Monica with M. Kousser,particularly M. Kousser's previous work for Santa Monica;review M. Kousser's report from 1992.

3.5

7/2/15 MRH Review both current and historic demographics of SantaMonica; pull key data from US Census

5.7

7/3/15 MRH Review election history of Santa Monica; gather historicalelection data from Los Angeles County Registrar

7.4

7/5/15 MRH Prepare memorandum comparing Santa Monica demographicsand voting patterns to benchmark political subdivisions,including summary spreadsheet of historical elections anddemographics of Santa Monica.

10.8

7/6/15 MRH Continue work on memorandum comparing Santa Monicademographics and voting patterns to benchmark politicalsubdivisions, including summary spreadsheet of historicalelections and demographics of Santa Monica.

6.3

7/7/15 MRH Travel to/from Caltech and meet with M. Kousser regardingpast work on Santa Monica and potential case against SantaMonica.

8.1

7/8/15 KIS Review summary memorandum on potential Santa Monicacase and meet with M. Hughes to discuss.

4.0

7/8/15 MRH Meeting with K. Shenkman regarding potential Santa Monicacase.

2.0

7/9/15 KIS Discuss intentional discrimination law and demographicconcentration with M. Hughes.

2.5

7/9/15 MRH Research regarding intentional discrimination andneighborhood level demographics of Santa Monica, discusssame with K. Shenkman.

9.1

7/10/15 MRH Travel to/from Compass Demographics and meet with D. Elyregarding potential case against Santa Monica.

7.5

7/13/15 MRH Travel to/from Caltech and meet with M. Kousser regardingintentional discrimination and potential case against SantaMonica.

9.3

7/14/15 MRH Travel to/from Caltech and meet with M. Kousser regardingpotential Equal Protection case against Santa Monica, andinterplay between CVRA and intentional discrimination case

6.8

7/20/15 MRH Research regarding intentional discrimination and issue offederal question and potential for California Constitutionclaim.

7.3

7/21/15 MRH Research regarding intentional discrimination and availablelegal avenues to address same.

5.9

7/22/15 MRH Research equal protection claims and drafting firmmemorandum.

9.0

7/23/15 MRH Research avenues of addressing intentional discrimination,elements of applicable claims, and drafting firmmemorandum.

7.5

7/24/15 MRH Draft firm memorandum regarding issues in potential CVRAand Equal Protection case against Santa Monica; discuss samewith K. Shenkman

10.2

7/24/15 KIS Review firm memorandum and discuss with M. Hughes 4.4

7/25/15 MRH Gather data and information regarding elections of SantaMonica and statewide propositions; discuss with experts.

7.7

7/27/15 MRH Travel to/from and meet with D. Ely at Compass Demographicsto work on Santa Monica potential case and potential impactthereof.

7.5

7/27/15 JU Research regarding financial and health disparities in SantaMonica, city council decisions, racial appeals in Santa Monicacampaigns, discuss with K. Shenkman.

8.2

7/28/15 MRH Gather data and information on exogenous elections of SantaMonica.

7.0

7/28/15 JU Research regarding comparative literacy rates and educationaloutcomes in Santa Monica and historical decisions of SantaMonica city council relating to education, focusing on north -south divide and racial segregation in schools and effect ofintradistrict and interdistrict transfers; discuss same with K.Shenkman

9.4

7/28/15 KIS Discuss education issues in Santa Monica with J. Jones. 1.5

7/29/15 MRH Travel to/from Caltech and meet with M. Kousser regardingpotential case against Santa Monica; compile initial ecologicalregression and ecological inference results

7.9

7/30/15 KIS Call with 0. de la Torre and M. Loya regarding progress andpotential case.

0.7

8/3/15 MRH Travel to/from Caltech and meet with M. Kousser regardingpotential case against Santa Monica

6.5

8/5/15 MRH Travel to/from Caltech and meet with M. Kousser regardingpotential case against Santa Monica

7.1

8/13/15 MRH Travel to/from Compass Demographics abd work with D. Ely todevelop election data sets for RPV analyses.

8.3

8/17/15 MRH Work with Compass Demographics to prepare HPA analysis,and creation of maps of elections by precinct.

6.9

8/20/15 MRH Work with Compass Demographics to prepare HPA analysis,and creation of maps of endogenous and exogenous electionsby precinct.

7.4

8/21/15 MRH Run rough regression analyses on key elections; discuss samewith K. Shenkman.

7.5

8/25/15 MRH Discuss potential additional exogenous elections for furtheranalysis with K. Shenkman, M. Kousser and D. Ely; gatherinformation regarding exogenous elections; discuss withexperts and K. Shenkman.

7.9

8/26/15 MRH Compile research and findings and prepare summary firmmemorandum and recommendations.

5.8

8/27/15 MRH Compile research and findings, further legal researchconcerning potential case against Santa Monica, and preparesummary firm memorandum and recommendations.

6.0

8/28/15 MRH Revise, finalize firm memorandum re potential Santa Monicacase; discuss same with K. Shenkman

3.6

8/28/15 KIS Review summary firm memorandum regarding Santa Monicaand discuss with M. Hughes.

4.5

8/30/15 KIS Review firm memorandum and Kousser 1992 report; draft andcirculate demand letter and respond to comments.

5.2

9/4/15 KIS Travel to/from and meet with Pico Neighborhood activistsregarding potential case and district election outreachcampaign.

5.5

9/7/15 JU Research campaign spending, sources of funds financingcampaigns, endorsements tied to electoral success in SantaMonica

7.5

9/8/15 JU Investigate history of discrimination in Santa Monica,representation in local government, boards and commissions,and historical and recent decisions of Santa Monica citycouncil.

8.6

9/9/15 JU Investigate history of discrimination in Santa Monica andcompile theses on the subject.

5.3

9/9/15 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and M. Loyaregarding district election public campaign and organizingeffort

4.0

9/10/15 JU Research racial appeals in Santa Monica elections(endogenous and exogenous), racial issues in local politicsboth recent and historic

6.4

9/11/15 JU Continue research on 14028(e) factors; compile researchmaterials and prepare summary firm memorandum on14028(e) factors

8.9

9/14/15 JU Draft summary firm memorandum on 14028e factors 4.0

9/29/15 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre re: Santa Monicacampaign and potential case and outreach to Latino leaders.

3.6

10/2/15 KIS Discuss potential case and tour Santa Monica's PicoNeighborhood with M. Grimes

5.0

10/15/15 KIS Review firm memoranda in preparation for meeting with SantaMonica activists; meet with 0. de la Torre and Pico YouthCenter staff.

6.3

10/16/15 KIS Meet with M. Loya and 0. de la Torre about Santa Monica caseand public campaign

3.8

10/16/15 MRH Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and M. Loya todiscuss initial findings and potential case.

3.8

10/19/15 MRH Work on materials for Santa Monica outreach campaign fordistrict elections

5.1

10/20/15 MRH Work on powerpoint and FAQs for outreach campaign fordistrict elections

5.5

10/26/15 MRH Revise powerpoint and FAQs for outreach campaign for districtelections, discuss with 0. de la Torre

4.6

10/30/15 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and M. Loya toprepare materials for community activist workshop.

4.9

10/30/15 MRH Work with M. Loya and 0. de la Torre in advance of rolloutmeeting.

4.9

11/3/15 KIS Travel to/from and participate in community activist workshopon district elections and history in Santa Monica to discussCVRA and process.

4.5

11/3/15 MRH Santa Monica district election campaign rollout meeting 4.5

11/9/15 JU Research regarding procedural path of Santa Monica tochange its election system voluntarily through political processand/or through court intervention in light of city charter,review applicable Government Code and Elections Codesections; discuss with K. Shenkman.

6.8

11/10/15 JU Research federal voting rights cases outside California todevelop potential paths for voluntary changes to electionsystem of Santa Monica despite city charter

8.0

11/11/15 JU Research FVRA preclearance and effect cases for electionchanges in context of settlements not effected throughconsent decrees or judgments, to develop potential paths forvoluntary election change in Santa Monica.

7.7

11/12/15 JU Research charter status and contents of jurisdictions makingelectoral changes in response to allegations of voting rightsand election law violations in and outside of California anddiscuss with K. Shenkman for applicability to Santa Monica.

8.1

11/13/15 JU Research availability of voluntary election change in SantaMonica in light of charter and Jauregui decision; draftsummary firm memorandum regarding same.

9.8

11/17/15 KIS Travel to/from and meet with T. Vazquez and 0. de la Torre,and then meet with 0. de la Torre and Pico Center staffthereafter

5.0

11/25/15 KIS Review report re police misconduct of SMPD against 0. de laTorre; discuss same with 0. de la Torre

2.0

12/13/15 KIS Draft press release for Santa Monica rollout 1.0

12/14/15 KIS Revise press release, discussions with 0. de la Torre and M.Loya re same.

1.2

12/15/15 KIS Rally in support of adopting district elections at SM city hall,deliver demand, discuss with SM Daily Press, discuss with SMCity Attorney M. Moutrie

3.7

12/20/15 KIS Deal with M. Feinstein opposition; discuss situation with CfERand FairVote leadership.

2.5

12/28/15 KIS Evaluate correspondence from M. Moutrie saying city willaddress the demand letter at Jan 12 meeting; discuss with 0.de la Torre re next steps.

0.8

1/4/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and M. Loyaregarding Santa Monica, efforts to obtain districts, andpotential case.

6.8

1/12/16 KIS Meet with 0 de la Torre and attend city council meetingtherafter

4.7

1/15/16 KIS Correspondence with T. Vazquez re support for districtelections and other issues

0.4

1/23/16 KIS Call with T. Vazquez and follow up thereafter 1.9

2/4/16 MRH Identify potential experts regarding discrimination anddisparities in Santa Monica; research background of same;discuss potential engagement by phone.

5.5

2/5/16 MRH Identify potential experts regarding discrimination anddisparities in Santa Monica; research background of same;discuss potential engagement by phone.

4.8

2/12/16 JU Gather initial research on Santa Monica and racially -polarizedvoting analysis; begin synthesizing research; for preparation offirm summary memorandum.

3.2

2/13/16 JU Research and drafting firm summary memorandum forpotential Santa Monica CVRA case.

5.7

2/14/16 JU Revise and finalize S&H firm summary memorandum regardingpotential Santa Monica CVRA case; circulate and discuss same

4.4

2/17/16 MRH Travel to/from and meet with potential 14028(e) experts 6.6

2/22/16 MRH Work w/ D. Ely on potential remedies in light of potentialchallenge based on lack of majority -minority district

5.9

2/24/16 MRH Research potential for single -member and multi -memberdistricts and combination of remedies

5.6

2/26/16 MRH Continue research regarding potential remedies and electionssystems employed in South Dakota and New Hampshire, draftfirm memorandum concerning same.

6.8

2/29/16 MRH Continue research regarding remedies and charter cityauthority to enact remedies inconsistent with charter,continue drafting firm memorandum concerning same.

6.4

3/1/16 MRH Further research and complete firm summary memorandumconcerning flexibility and availability of combination remediesinconsistent and consistent with charter enactments.

6.3

3/4/16 KIS Discuss potential case with Pico Neighborhood activists andbreakout groups regarding district election campaign

4.9

3/7/16 KIS Discuss potential CVRA case against Santa Monica andprovisions of Santa Monica city charter with AMPS leaders.

3.0

3/8/16 KIS Research regarding Education Code, county committeeauthority on election changes, and effect of Santa Monicacharter and potential effect thereon of case against City ofSanta Monica

4.5

3/9/16 KIS Further discussion with AMPS leaders regarding involvement /support of potential case against City of Santa Monica

1.7

3/9/16 MRH Discuss AMPS role with K. Shenkman, research regardingEducation Code and potential impact of finding of CVRAviolation and/or Equal Protection violation.

2.8

3/10/16 MRH Research regarding potential effect of court findings oncharter provisions on county committee authority under EdCode 5019; begin drafting memorandum re same.

5.7

3/11/16 MRH Further research and finalize firm memorandum regardingpotential impact of CVRA/Equal Protection declarationconcerning Santa Monica city charter on county committeeauthority

6.0

3/14/16 MRH Research regarding standing of Pico Neighborhood Associationand AMPS, based on membership and interests.

6.2

3/15/16 MRH Discussion with 0. de la Torre concerning Pico NeighborhoodAssociation membership and interests; further researchregarding standing of Pico Neighborhood Association andAMPS, based on membership and interests.

3.9

3/17/16 MRH Research regarding standing of AMPS and Pico NeighborhoodAssociation; draft firm memorandum regarding same.

2.6

3/18/16 MRH Research regarding standing of AMPS and Pico NeighborhoodAssociation; draft firm memorandum regarding same.

4.5

3/20/16 KIS Review memorandum concerning organizations' standing;discussion with AMPS leadership regarding same and potentialinvolvement in case.

1.0

3/23/16 KIS Research equal protection claim and potential for removalbased on federal question.

2.4

3/24/16 KIS Research regarding standards under equal protection clausesin US and Cal Constitutions; discuss same with M. Hughes.

3.5

3/25/16 KIS Research regarding relative standards under federal andCalifornia constitutions for equal protection claims and similarclaims under other provisions of federal and stateconstitutions

4.8

3/26/16 KIS Research regarding relative standards under federal andCalifornia constitutions for equal protection claims and similarclaims under other provisions of federal and stateconstitutions

6.0

3/28/16 KIS Research and begin drafting firm memorandum regardingrelative standards under federal and California constitutionsfor equal protection claims and similar claims under otherprovisions of federal and state constitutions

4.3

3/29/16 KIS Research concerning desirability of asserting equal protectionclaim under US and/or California constitutions; draftingmemorandum on same.

5.1

3/31/16 KIS Further research, drafting, revising memorandum regardingrelative standards under US and Cal Constitutions andavailability of removal based on claims, defenses andallegations asserted

5.9

4/1/16 KIS Revise memorandum on equal protection claim and potentialremoval; circulate same and discuss with M. Hughes

3.3

4/2/16 KIS Drafting complaint and reviewing demographic and electioninformation and firm memoranda for the same; discuss same

2.9

4/3/16 KIS Drafting complaint and reviewing demographic and electioninformation for the same, coordinate with Pico activists onpress and organizational effort.

4.6

4/5/16 MRH Finalizing complaint for filing, draft summons and civil casecoversheet

1.1

4/6/16 KIS Review complaint; discuss with R. Rubin and concerns reremoval

0.9

4/7/16 KIS Work with Pico Neighborhood activists and AMPS leadershipon publicity and organizational effort to coincide withcomplaint filing.

2.0

4/8/16 KIS Work with Pico Neighborhood activists and AMPS leadershipon publicity and organizational effort to coincide withcomplaint filing, call with R. Rubin re: same

0.8

4/11/16 KIS Draft, revise, finalize press release regarding case filing andcoordinate rollout with Pico Neighborhood activists.

1.8

4/13/16 MRH Research regarding Judge Palazuelos to determine whether tofile 170.6 challenge, and discuss experiences with Palazueloswith attorneys appearing in her courtroom previously.

2.4

4/13/16 KIS Discuss case with local press. 1.3

4/14/16 KIS Deal with retaliation by Santa Monica for case filing;discussions with 0. de la Torre, M. Sweetmore and C. Fosteramong others regarding same.

3.5

4/15/16 KIS Further deal with retaliation by Santa Monica related to MUNCwalkout from negotiations, discuss same with press,conference call with AMPS leadership; discuss same andpotential impact on SMMUSD with its attorney (M. Foster).

6.6

4/16/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with L. Rosenthal, C. Foster, M.Sweetmore and R. Israel regarding MUNC walkout retaliationand AMPS role

4.5

4/17/16 KIS Discussions with AMPS leadership, Malibu city staff, PicoNeighborhood activists etc. regarding MUNC situation andAMPS continued role; field press inquiries; draft resignationletter and formulate press strategy for same.

6.9

4/18/16 KIS Revise MUNC resignation letter; deal with aftermath ofresignation letter; field press inquiries regarding same and

5.9

voting rights case generally, call with R. Rubin regardinginterplay between case and school district

4/19/16 KIS Discussions with local press, AMPS leadership and PicoNeighborhood activists regarding resignation and response toSanta Monica retaliation; draft correspondence re: same.

4.4

4/20/16 KIS Correspondence and discussions with M. Moutrie, T. Larmore,S. Peak and C. Foster regarding Santa Monica's response tolawsuit and aftermath of retaliation

4.5

4/21/16 KIS Research regarding historical elections and draft first set ofdiscovery requests to Santa Monica

5.3

4/22/16 KIS Draft first set of discovery requests to Santa Monica 2.5

4/25/16 MRH Research regarding ethical obligations due to split in interestsbetween AMPS and Pico plaintiffs

7.3

4/26/16 MRH Research regarding ethical obligations due to split in interestsbetween AMPS and Pico plaintiffs, and impact of variousalternatives on NM ability to represent Santa Monica.

6.4

4/27/16 MRH Further research regarding ethical obligations due to AMPSdesire to withdraw from case and potential for maintainingconflict for NM.

6.8

4/28/16 MRH Further research regarding ethical obligations re AMPS-PNAsplit and impact on NM conflict; drafting firm memorandumregarding same.

7.0

5/2/16 KIS Evaluate letter from T. Larmore regarding intention to returnto MUNC task because of K. Shenkman resignation; discusssame and course of action re AMPS with M. Sweetmore.

0.7

5/3/16 MRH Continue research regarding course of action in light of AMPSrequest; investigate Santa Monica's process of retainingcounsel; complete firm memorandum regarding ethical andsuggested course of action.

7.2

5/9/16 KIS Discussion with R. Simon regarding airport dispute andpotential for collaboration; investigate same thereafter.

3.8

5/11/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with R. Simon and N. Rubin regardingpotential collaboration and politics of airport and SantaMonica more generally.

2.9

5/18/16 KIS Evaluate Santa Monica's Answer; research for potentialdemurrer to answer; discuss with M. Hughes.

2.2

5/19/16 MRH Research regarding potential demurrer to answer, propriety ofamending answer and need for leave of court, and whetherpleading challenge to answer can prevent amendment ofanswer.

4.9

5/24/16 KIS Call with J. Shachtner re discovery, retaliation, and casegenerally; investigate contentions of J. Shachtner; draftcorrespondence regarding deposition dates

1.5

5/26/16 KIS Correspondence with J. Shachtner re discovery, retaliation,and case generally

1.9

5/28/16 KIS Evaluate amended answer, compare for inconsistency;research regarding sham pleadings and potential action.

4.0

6/1/16 KIS Evaluate deficient discovery responses from Defendant 1.0

6/3/16 KIS Drafting meet and confer letters in response to deficientdiscovery responses.

2.5

6/6/16 KIS Research and drafting meet and confer letters in response todeficient discovery responses.

3.1

6/7/16 KIS Review supplementary discovery responses from Defendant;discuss with M. Hughes.

3.8

6/10/16 KIS Drafting meet and confer letters in response to Defendant'ssupplemental discovery responses; research propriety ofsupplementing RFA responses in inconsistent manner andappropriate action in response thereto.

5.9

6/17/16 KIS Evaluate SMDP article regarding Pico Neighborhood politicalorganization and Sanders -Clinton primary results; investigateprecinct level results and 0. de la Torre involvement inSanders campaign.

4.8

6/20/16 KIS Review discovery responses and drafting meet and conferletters

4.7

6/21/16 KIS Review discovery responses and drafting meet and conferletters

2.6

6/22/16 KIS Review documents produced by Defendant 4.1

6/23/16 KIS Review documents produced by Defendant; prepare summaryof council actions and consideration

5.6

6/24/16 KIS Review documents produced by Defendant; prepare summary;investigate council and political action following 1992 meeting

6.8

6/24/16 MRH Document review and preparing spreadsheets for historicalelections.

7.0

6/27/16 MRH Document review and preparing spreadsheets for historicalelections.

5.2

6/28/16 KIS Review discovery responses and drafting meet and conferletters; finalize meet and confer letter regarding specialinterrogatories

3.9

6/28/16 MRH Document review and preparing spreadsheets for historicalelections.

5.9

6/29/16 KIS Review discovery responses and drafting meet and conferletters; finalize meet and confer letters regarding first andsecond sets of requests for production of documents and forminterrogatories

4.5

7/8/16 KIS Evaluate correspondence regarding counsel change; discusswith M. Hughes

0.4

7/8/16 MRH Investigate Gibson Dunn experience in CVRA cases; reviewpreviously obtained briefs by Gibson attorneys on CVRA case;discuss with K. Shenkman

5.3

7/11/16 KIS Review discovery requests and responses; prepare for andparticipate in conference call with Defendant's new counsel;discuss case strategy with R. Rubin thereafter

3.3

7/11/16 MRH Evaluate options with respect to AMPS in light of new counselidentification and discuss same with K. Shenkman

1.0

7/12/16 KIS Discussions with AMPS leadership, and separately with PicoNeighborhood plaintiffs, regarding plan to remove AMPS from

case.

1.2

7/13/16 KIS Draft meet and confer letter regarding document production. 1.5

7/14/16 MRH Investigate T. Vazquez history 3.8

7/15/16 KIS Review documents produced and responses to documentrequests and revise meet and confer letter accordingly.

2.7

7/15/16 MRH Investigate T. Vazquez and M. Leon -Vazquez 5.5

7/18/16 MRH Investigate council members and actions in late 1980s andearly 1990s

6.9

7/19/16 MRH Investigate council members and actions in late 1980s and

early 1990s

6.6

7/20/16 KIS Draft request for dismissal and discuss with AMPS leadershipand M. Delrahim.

1.0

7/21/16 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel along withdraft CMS and supplemental discovery responses andsupplemental document production.

3.2

7/22/16 MRH Review supplemental documents produced by Defendant andwork on historical election spreadsheets.

7.0

7/25/16 KIS Review Defendant's draft CMS, draft correspondenceregarding same, and draft Plaintiffs' CMS

1.2

7/28/16 KIS Attempt to review supplemental document production,n andcorrespondence with Defendant's counsel re same.

0.3

7/29/16 KIS Evaluate Defendant's CMS and draft correspondenceregarding impropriety of same (purporting to be a joint CMS)

1.0

7/30/16 KIS Review supplemental discovery responses and begin draftingcorrespondence regarding continued deficiencies in responses.

5.6

7/31/16 KIS Evaluate RFA responses and research regarding standard andprocedure for denying a previously admitted RFA.

4.1

8/1/16 KIS Review supplemental document production, and draftingcorrespondence regarding continued deficiencies insupplemental discovery responses and need for depositiondates.

3.0

8/2/16 KIS Review correspondence from Defendant's counsel, revisedDefendant's CMS, and further supplemental interrogatoryresponses

1.4

8/3/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Grimes, J. Karton and I.Jackson to develop case story.

3.4

8/5/16 MRH Review correspondence regarding deposition availability andinvestigation in preparation for depositions of councilmembers

4.8

8/5/16 KIS Evaluate correspondence regarding depositions and discusssame and deposition preparation with M. Hughes.

0.6

8/6/16 MRH Investigation for upcoming depositions of council members 7.3

8/8/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and R. Rubin 3.5

8/9/16 KIS Travel to/from and attend meeting with M. Hughes, 0. de IaTorre and M. Grimes re case generally and council memberdepositions

5.4

8/9/16 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding CMC and Defendant's counsel 0.5

8/9/16 MRH Meet with K. Shenkman, Oscar De La Torre and Milton Grimesregarding deposition investigation and preparation andgeneral story / theme.

5.4

8/10/16 KIS Travel to/from and attend CMC and debrief co -counsel andclients thereafter.

5.0

8/11/16 KIS Travel to/from and attend meeting with 0. de Ia Torreregarding case and upcoming depositions

3.8

8/12/16 KIS Evaluate Defendant's discovery requests and discuss with J.

Douglass

1.8

8/16/16 KIS Drafting responses to Defendant's discovery requests. 3.5

8/19/16 KIS Drafting responses to Defendant's discovery requests. 5.1

8/22/16 MRH Investigation and preparing deposition outlines for SantaMonica council members.

7.5

8/24/16 MRH Investigation and preparing deposition outlines for SantaMonica council members.

6.9

8/25/16 MRH Investigation and preparing deposition outlines for SantaMonica council members.

7.3

8/29/16 MRH Investigation and preparing deposition outlines for SantaMonica council members.

7.4

9/2/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with Pico Neighborhood AssociationBoard re case update and outlook.

4.2

9/6/16 KIS Correspondence with Defendant's counsel regardingdeposition scheduling and location; research regardinglocation of depositions.

3.8

9/7/16 KIS Research regarding location of depositions and "good cause"for ordering location be different than the default of the CCP;discuss with R. Parris; call with Defendant's counsel regardinglocation and scheduling of T. Vazquez deposition anddepositions going forward.

6.9

9/9/16 KIS Draft and revise responses to Defendant's first set of discoveryrequests.

3.1

9/11/16 KIS Revise and finalize responses to Defendant's discoveryrequests.

2.6

9/12/16 KIS Review materials for T. Vazquez deposition prepared by M.Hughes and discuss same with M. Hughes

3.4

9/12/16 MRH Investigation for T. Vazquez and T. O'Day depositions anddiscuss with K. Shenkman

8.3

9/13/16 KIS Investigate further for T. Vazquez deposition and prepare forsame

7.2

9/15/16 KIS Investigation and prepare for deposition of T. Vazquez 4.7

9/16/16 KIS Investigation and preparation for T. Vazquez deposition;review, deal with and draft response to correspondence fromDefendant's counsel regarding the same

6.5

9/19/16 KIS Prepare for deposition of T. Vazquez 7.8

9/20/16 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and take deposition of T. Vazquez. 11.3

9/20/16 MRH Investigation for T. O'Day deposition. 4.9

9/21/16 KIS Discuss findings on T. O'Day with M. Hughes and continuepreparation for T. O'Day deposition; deal with Defendant'scounsel's continued nonsense regarding the scheduling andlocation of depositions of council members

5.3

9/22/16 KIS Continue investigation of T. O'Day actions and issues; preparenotes outline of T. O'Day findings and discuss same with R.Parris

7.4

9/23/16 KIS Debriefing re T. O'Day deposition and continue to deal withDefendant's counsel's nonsense regarding depositionscheduling and location.

2.0

9/26/16 KIS Evaluate Defendant's further supplemental responses to forminterrogatories; discuss further action regarding same.

1.2

9/27/16 KIS Research regarding potential actions to compel depositionattendance and location and potential for sanctions forDefendant's cancellation of deposition.

5.0

9/28/16 KIS Correspondence back and forth with Defendant's counselregarding their continued insistence on ignoring the CCPcommand about deposition location and their refusal toschedule depositions; further research regarding same andbegin drafting motion to compel completion of T. Vazquezdeposition.

8.5

9/29/16 KIS More correspondence back and forth with Defendant'scounsel regarding their continued insistence on ignoring theCCP command about deposition location and their refusal toschedule depositions; drafting motion to compel completionof T. Vazquez deposition, call with R. Rubin re: same.

7.9

9/30/16 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel purportingto be meet and confer regarding Plaintiffs' discoveryresponses; research regarding sufficiency of meet and confer;review discovery responses to respond to Defendant's letter

4.8

10/1/16 KIS Review investigation findings re G. Davis from M. Hughes anddiscuss same with M. Hughes; further investigate for G. Davisdeposition; research regarding voter perception of ethnicity toguide G. Davis deposition questioning.

9.2

10/2/16 KIS Further investigate for G. Davis deposition and preparedeposition outline; further research regarding voterperception of ethnicity in identifying minority candidates;discuss with M. Grimes.

8.6

10/3/16 KIS Review discovery responses referenced in Defendant's letter;research sufficiency of same; drafting responsive letter

4.5

10/4/16 KIS Further research regarding sufficiency of discovery responsesand impropriety of certain of Defendant's discovery requests,and draft letter responding to Defendant's purported meetand confer letter

7.0

10/5/16 KIS Further investigation for G. Davis deposition; discuss samewith M. Grimes to prepare for deposition.

5.6

10/6/16 KIS Travel to/from and attend deposition of G. Davis. 9.7

10/7/16 KIS Continue to deal with T. Vazquez deposition scheduling andcontinued dispute regarding deposition location and draftcorrespondence re same.

2.9

10/10/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with Parris firm team regardingdepositions and case generally, and conference call withDefendant's counsel regarding scheduling of T. Vazquezdeposition and location.

6.8

10/10/16 MRH Meeting with Parris attorneys and staff to coordinate tasksand strategy for case.

6.5

10/11/16 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardingPlaintiffs' discovery responses and review referenceddiscovery responses.

3.0

10/12/16 MRH Review and summarize deposition transcript of T. Vazquez,and discuss deposition with K. Shenkman

5.6

10/12/16 KIS Discuss first day of deposition of T. Vazquez with M. Hughesand further investigate and prepare for second day of T.Vazquez deposition.

4.7

10/13/16 MRH Investigation for McKeown deposition 5.8

10/14/16 MRH Continue investigation for McKeown deposition, discuss withK. Shenkman and 0. de la Torre (separately), and draftingdeposition outline

7.9

10/16/16 KIS Review correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardingdiscovery responses, research regarding sufficiency of meetand confer and draft correspondence re same.

2.6

10/17/16 KIS Draft supplemental responses to Defendant's discoveryrequests where appropriate

4.3

10/20/16 KIS Draft supplemental responses to Defendant's discoveryrequests where appropriate, call with R. Rubin regardingtiming and disclosure of expert opinions

4.9

10/23/16 KIS Draft supplemental responses to Defendant's discoveryrequests where appropriate

2.2

10/24/16 KIS Read and summarize transcript of O'Day deposition anddiscuss with R. Parris.

4.8

10/25/16 KIS Research and drafting opposition papers to Defendant's exparte application to advance hearings on 8 motions to compelfurther responses.

9.4

10/26/16 KIS Finalize ex parte opposition papers, travel to/from and attendex parte hearing, debrief co -counsel thereafter, and reviewmotion to compel at issue in ex parte.

8.8

10/27/16 KIS Research regarding discovery referee appointment and costsallocation, discuss potential discovery referees with R. Parris,correspondence with Defendant's counsel re same, evaluate 8motions to compel purportedly necessitating discovery refereeappointment

6.0

10/28/16 KIS Further research regarding appointment of discovery refereeand costs therefor and lengthy discussion with Defendant'scounsel regarding discovery referee and discovery disputes;draft correspondence memorializing conversation withDefendant's counsel

8.3

10/31/16 KIS Correspondence and further lengthy conversation withDefendant's counsel regarding discovery referee and discoverydisputes, and research in advance of conversation.

7.4

11/1/16 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend continued ex partehearing regarding discovery referee, discuss same with R.Parris, and correspondence thereafter regarding same.

4.9

11/2/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Grimes, M. Hughes, F. Juarezand 0. de la Torre, call with R. Rubin thereafter regardingdiscrimination expert

7.1

11/2/16 MRH Meeting at Grimes office with potential local discriminationexpert.

6.0

11/3/16 KIS Prepare for and participate in lengthy conference withDefendant's counsel regarding discovery disputes etc., andbegin drafting memorializing correspondence on same.

3.8

11/4/16 KIS Drafting supplemental responses to discovery requestsconsistent with conversations with Defendant's counsel.

4.3

11/7/16 KIS Investigation in preparation of T. Vazquez continuingdeposition.

4.2

11/8/16 KIS Research and drafting supplemental responses to discoveryrequests, and draft correspondence memorializing November3 conference with Defendant's counsel.

5.3

11/10/16 KIS Preparation for T. Vazquez deposition, investigate 2016campaign and precinct totals for same.

5.9

11/11/16 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardingdiscovery disputes, research and working on supplementalresponses consistent with discussions and letter.

4.0

11/14/16 KIS Further investigation and preparation for T. Vazquezcontinuing deposition, including review of previous depositiontranscript and available videos of T. Vazquez

7.3

11/15/16 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and take deposition of T. Vazquez;meet with Parris team thereafter

9.5

11/16/16 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding discovery 0.3

11/23/16 KIS Correspondence with Defendant's counsel regarding discoveryreferee etc.

1.0

11/27/16 KIS Drafting supplemental discovery responses (RFAs and forminterrogatories) in light of discussions with Defendant'scounsel and research concerning expert discovery timing andimpact on RFAs

5.5

11/28/16 KIS Research and drafting opposition papers for Defendant's exparte application regarding discovery referee.

7.1

11/29/16 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend ex parte hearingregarding discovery referee and Defendant's continuing

6.7

gripes; work with Defendant's counsel on discovery refereestipulation and correspondence regarding the samethereafter.

11/30/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and CentinelaValley USD constituents regarding T. Vazquez and M. Leon -Vazquez transgressions; further deal with discovery refereestipulation and confer with R. Parris re same.

5.2

12/1/16 KIS Drafting supplemental discovery responses (RFAs and forminterrogatories) in light of discussions with Defendant'scounsel and research concerning expert discovery timing andimpact on RFAs

6.3

12/2/16 KIS Drafting supplemental responses to document requests inlight of discussions with Defendant's counsel and researchconcerning expert discovery timing and good causerequirement for motions to compel responses to RFPs

5.4

12/3/16 MRH Read and summarize transcript of second deposition of T.Vazquez, discuss with K. Shenkman.

4.9

12/4/16 KIS Coordinate with R. Parris regarding list of potential discoveryreferees and address stipulation regarding same.

1.1

12/4/16 MRH Investigate potential discovery referees and pull availabledecisions of each to compile proclivities on discovery issuesand voting rights where available.

5.8

12/5/16 KIS Discuss document request responses and production andimplications thereof with 0. de la Torre and M. Loya; draftingsupplemental responses to document requests in light ofdiscussions with Defendant's counsel and research concerningexpert discovery timing and good cause requirement formotions to compel responses to RFPs

3.5

12/5/16 MRH Further investigate potential discovery referees and completechart comparing discovery referee candidates.

2.9

12/8/16 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding experts 0.512/9/16 MRH Document review and preparation for production and work

with clients to gather documents.6.2

12/10/16 MRH Gathering documents, review and preparation for production 5.712/11/16 KIS Coordinate preparation of discovery referee info for list to

court, and review drafts of same.0.8

12/13/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre regarding casegenerally, document production, etc.

4.3

12/14/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with Pico Neighborhood Assn board 4.012/15/16 KIS Investigation for McKeown deposition, discuss with R. Parris 4.912/15/16 MRH Prepare deposition outline with K. Shenkman for McKeown

deposition and discuss McKeown actions with Santa Monicaresidents.

6.0

12/16/16 KIS Travel to/from and attend deposition of K. McKeown anddebriefing and discussion with R. Parris and M. Cussimoniothereafter regarding case preparation.

10.9

12/18/16 KIS Review discovery requests and responses and correspondenceregarding same to identify scope of continued disputes, anddiscuss with R. Rubin

2.8

12/19/16 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and M. Loyaregarding case generally, discovery and logistics and gatheringof documents for production, call with M. Hughes, R. Parrisand R. Rubin, and draft correspondence regarding remainingdiscovery disputes and path forward for resolution of same.

7.8

12/19/16 MRH Meeting with PNA clients and conference with K. Shenkman, R.Parris and R. Rubin.

5.2

12/20/16 MRH Document review and preparation for production, discusssame with K. Shenkman

5.3

12/21/16 KIS Prepare for and further discussion with Defendant's counselregarding discovery responses, production etc., and draftingsupplemental discovery responses in light of continuingdiscussions.

4.6

12/24/16 KIS Call with R. Rubin and R. Parris regarding experts 0.4

12/27/16 MRH Draft and revise supplemental responses to documentrequests in light of discussion with K. Shenkman regardingconversations with Defendant's counsel and review ofdocuments available to produce.

5.3

12/29/16 KIS Evaluate motion for judgment on the pleadings and discusssame with M. Hughes.

3.6

12/29/16 MRH Read Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, quickresearch raised by motion, discuss with K. Shenkman.

4.8

12/30/16 KIS Research for opposition to motion for judgment on thepleadings, call with R. Rubin re: same

5.9

12/31/16 KIS Research for opposition to motion for judgment on thepleadings and develop outline for opposition

5.5

1/1/17 KIS Further research for opposition to motion for judgment on thepleadings

4.9

1/2/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for judgment onthe pleadings

7.0

1/3/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for judgment onthe pleadings, call with R. Rubin re: same

8.5

1/4/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for judgment onthe pleadings

9.3

1/5/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for judgment onthe pleadings

9.6

1/6/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for judgment onthe pleadings

7.5

1/7/17 MRH Discuss motion for judgment on the pleadings with K.Shenkman; revise opposition

3.2

1/7/17 KIS Revise opposition to motion for judgment on the pleadingsand draft ancillary documents; further research for finalpoints.

7.7

1/8/17 KIS Revise opposition to motion for judgment on the pleadingsand draft supporting documents; further research for finalpoints.

5.0

1/9/17 MRH Revise opposition to motion for judgment on the pleadings 2.2

1/10/17 KIS Finalize opposition papers to motion for judgment on thepleadings and coordinate filing.

2.7

1/11/17 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding experts 0.4

1/11/17 MRH Review additional documents at clients' home gathered byclients for document production

3.4

1/12/17 KIS Coordinate production of documents. 0.6

1/12/17 KIS Conference with potential survey experts 0.7

1/15/17 KIS Coordinate production of documents. 0.5

1/17/17 KIS Draft supplemental responses to special interrogatoriesconsistent with discussions with Defendant's counsel

1.3

1/18/17 KIS Travel to/from clients' home for document production, reviewdocuments to be produced and coordinate same.

5.5

1/19/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with PNA board. 3.5

1/24/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply in support of motion for judgmenton the pleadings; discuss same with R. Rubin; research casescited therein and issues raised by reply.

4.6

1/25/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and S. Duron 3.9

1/30/17 KIS Coordinate with M. Kousser on case and needed analysis 0.7

1/30/17 KIS Call with R. Rubin re: upcoming hearing 0.7

2/1/17 KIS Research and prepare for hearing on motion for judgment onthe pleadings

2.0

2/2/17 KIS Prepare for hearing on motion for judgment on the pleadings,discuss with R. Rubin.

3.6

2/3/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on motion forjudgment on the pleadings; deal with press thereafter.

5.2

2/10/17 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel todiscovery referee's assistant regarding supplementingDefendant's motions to compel, research ability tosupplement motions to compel after 45 -day deadline haspassed, draft correspondence regarding same.

4.9

2/20/17 KIS Review case materials and drafting FAC to address issues incourt's ruling on motion for judgment on the pleadings

3.5

2/21/17 KIS Draft FAC, call with R. Rubin re: same 3.9

2/22/17 KIS Discuss FAC with co -counsel and clients, and reviseaccordingly.

2.3

2/24/17 KIS Travel to/from and attend PNA event to discuss case generallyand expected path going forward.

4.0

3/4/17 KIS Evaluate planning commission reports for statementsconcerning Pico Neighborhood disparities, distinctions andhistory

4.2

3/5/17 MRH Pull commission reports and city council minutes and reviewfor helpful items of discrimination against minorities and thePico Neighborhood

9.0

3/6/17 MRH Investigate process associated with location of the 10 freeway;evaluate commission reports and city council minutes andreview for helpful items of discrimination against minoritiesand the Pico Neighborhood.

7.6

3/6/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with T. Crane. 3.3

3/7/17 KIS Call with R. Parris re: depositions 0.4

3/13/17 KIS Travel to/from and speak at N.E. Neighbors meeting to provideinformation and update on case.

3.8

3/14/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with A. Gonzalez regarding T.Vazquez and case generally fitting into Southwest VoterRegistration Education Project campaign.

5.4

3/16/17 KIS Review correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardingdemurrer and discuss with M. Hughes.

0.3

3/20/17 KIS Coordinate retention of survey expert 0.6

3/21/17 KIS Pull CVRA complaints filed by G. Brown in Sanchez v Modestoand Rey v Madera USD to compare level of specificity withFAC, research regarding level of specificity in voting rightscomplaints generally, and discuss course of action re need foramendment with R. Rubin.

6.1

3/22/17 KIS Prepare for and participate in conference with Defendant'scounsel regarding anticipated demurrer.

2.0

3/23/17 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardinganticipated demurrer; draft correspondence in response; andresearch for same.

4.9

3/24/17 KIS Evaluate letter brief submitted by Defendant 0.5

3/29/17 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding upcoming conference withdiscovery referee

0.5

3/31/17 KIS Prepare for and participate in telephonic conference withJudge Bostrom; confer with co -counsel re same.

4.0

4/1/17 KIS Evaluate demurrer to FAC, discuss with M. Hughes 2.8

4/1/17 MRH Review Defendant's demurrer to Plaintiffs' FAC and researchcompiled on specificity of voting rights complaints and discusswith K. Shenkman.

3.8

4/3/17 KIS Research for opposition to demurrer to FAC 5.2

4/4/17 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding demurrer 0.5

4/6/17 KIS Research for opposition to demurrer to FAC and discussionwith J. Levitt re same and case generally

6.0

4/7/17 KIS Research for opposition to demurrer to FAC and case generallyconsistent with discussion with J. Levitt

5.7

4/10/17 KIS Research for opposition to demurrer to FAC and case generallyconsistent with discussion with J. Levitt and summarizeresearch in firm memorandum, call with R. Rubin re: same

7,8

4/11/17 KIS Evaluate submissions to discovery referee by Defendant;research and draft responsive letter brief

9.6

4/12/17 KIS Research and drafting letter brief to discovery referee 9.3

4/12/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with F. Guerra, A. Alarcon and B.Gilbert regarding survey expert and case generally

3.5

4/13/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with J. Levitt regarding demurrer andcase generally and potential for J. Levitt as expert witness

6.5

4/14/17 MRH Discuss letter brief and discovery responses with K. Shenkman,revise letter to Bostrom accordingly

1.5

4/14/17 KIS Revise letter brief to discovery referee and discuss same withM. Hughes.

0.7

4/17/17 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding demurrer 0.4

4/18/17 KIS Research and investigate issues identified in discussion with J.Levitt for demurrer and case generally.

7.0

4/19/17 KIS Research and investigate issues identified in discussion with J.Levitt for demurrer and case generally.

7.7

4/21/17 KIS Research and investigate issues identified in discussion with J.Levitt for demurrer and case generally, conference with M.Fahey and R. Rubin re: same

7.2

4/25/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC 8.3

4/26/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC 6.9

4/29/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC 8.2

5/1/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC 7.3

5/2/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC 7.6

5/4/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC andassociated papers

6.2

5/5/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC andassociated papers, call with M. Fahey and R. Rubin re: same

6.6

5/7/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to demurrer to FAC andassociated papers

5.0

5/8/17 KIS Revising opposition to demurrer to FAC; discuss same with M.Hughes and J. Levitt

3.8

5/8/17 MRH Review and revise opposition to demurrer and discuss with K.Shenkman

3.7

5/9/17 KIS Revise and finalize papers in opposition to demurrer for filing. 2.9

5/10/17 KIS Correspondence about discovery referee scheduling andDefendant claiming prejudice by scheduling.

0.4

5/11/17 KIS Call with M. Kousser and direct tasks on ER analysis 1.5

5/13/17 KIS Research and drafting letter briefs requested by discoveryreferee in opposition to Defendant's various motions tocompel

7.4

5/14/17 KIS Research and drafting 8 letter briefs requested by discoveryreferee in opposition to Defendant's various motions tocompel

6.9

5/15/17 KIS Research and drafting letter briefs requested by discoveryreferee in opposition to Defendant's various motions tocompel

5.5

5/16/17 MRH Revise opposition briefs for discovery referee and discuss withK. Shenkman

2.0

5/16/17 KIS Revise letter briefs consistent with discussion with M. Hughes. 0.85/17/17 KIS Revise and finalize 8 letter briefs to discovery referee

regarding Defendant's motions to compel2.1

5/20/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply papers in support of its demurrer,research cases cited therein.

4.5

5/23/17 MRH Draft further requests for production of documents 2.3

5/23/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's letter briefs to discovery referee anddeal with some issues identified as still in dispute and draftcorrespondence re same.

2.5

5/24/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing at Judicate West, and deal with aftermath.

6.8

5/25/17 KIS Investigate S. Himmelrich actions and issues in preparation fordeposition

5.3

5/26/17 KIS Investigation for S. Himmelrich deposition, discuss with SantaMonica constituents

4.9

5/28/17 KIS Research and preparation for S. Himmelrich deposition 6.5

5/29/17 KIS Further investigation and discussion with SM constituents re S.Himmelrich; draft deposition outline.

7.1

5/30/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and take deposition of S.Himmelrich.

6.7

6/1/17 KIS Call with R. Rubin re: upcoming hearing 0.5

6/2/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with D. Parker and CDP officialsregarding Santa Monica case, party resolutions and politicalsupport

4.5

6/2/17 MRH Meeting with Cal. Dem. Party. 4.5

6/4/17 KIS Review demurrer papers, research open issues and prepare fordemurrer hearing.

3.9

6/5/17 KIS Travel to/from (Santa Monica) and participate in Voice ofAmerica filming for story on Santa Monica voting rights case

4.3

6/5/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with R. Rubin to prepare fordemurrer hearing.

3.5

6/6/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on demurrer;discuss with co -counsel and press thereafter.

5.4

6/7/17 KIS Meeting with PNA Board to update on case and coordinateorganizational effort.

3.8

6/8/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with D. Ely and J. Jones regardingcase tasks and demographic presentation

5.8

6/8/17 JU Meeting with K. Shenkman and D. Ely 4.0

6/9/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's draft stipulation concerning caseschedule, draft correspondence in response to same, andcoordinate with R. Parris re same.

1.5

6/12/17 KIS Travel to/from (downtown) and participate in Voice ofAmerica filming for story on Santa Monica voting rights case

4.9

6/12/17 JU Research regarding expert witness conflict issue. 6.0

6/13/17 JU Research regarding expert witness conflict issue. 6.7

6/14/17 JU Research and drafting firm memorandum regarding expertwitness conflict issue.

8.3

6/15/17 JU Research and drafting firm memorandum regarding expertwitness conflict issue.

9.6

6/20/17 KIS Correspondence back and forth and conference call withDefendant's counsel regarding case schedule in advance ofstatus conference.

1.1

6/21/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend status conferenceregarding case schedule.

4.7

6/21/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing two worlds in one city. 5.3

6/22/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing two worlds in one city. 5.9

6/23/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing two worlds in one city. 4.8

6/26/17 KIS Handle scheduling mess regarding conference with discoveryreferee and draft correspondence re same, call with R. Rubinre: same.

0.7

6/27/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing two worlds in one city. 5.5

6/28/17 KIS Review Defendant's answer to FAC and discuss with co-counsel possibility of demurrer to answer.

1.0

6/28/17 MRH Evaluate Defendant's responses to third set of documentrequests and compare with notes of investigation.

1.5

7/3/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing story of election effect onPico Neighborhood.

6.0

7/5/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing two worlds in one city. 3.3

7/6/17 KIS Travel to/from and speak at NOMA meeting regarding casestatus and contentions.

3.8

7/10/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing effect of election method onnot only outcome but also impact on Pico Neighborhood andpeople of color

7.2

7/11/17 JU Work with D. Ely on case showing effect of election method onnot only outcome but also impact on Pico Neighborhood andpeople of color

6.1

7/12/17 KIS Prepare for and participate in conference with discoveryreferee, research issue of discovery referee authority inresponse to concern expressed by discovery referee

3.2

7/13/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's submission regarding authority ofdiscovery referee, research same issues, send correspondenceto discovery referee in light of research

4.6

7/14/17 MRH Read and summarize transcript of deposition of S. Himmelrich 5.37/14/17 KIS Review correspondence from Defendant's counsel alleging

violation of ethical obligations; confer with M. Grimesregarding allegations; research applicable ethical obligations;draft response.

4.0

7/17/17 JU Discuss allegations by Defendant's counsel with K. Shenkman;research ethical obligations raised by correspondence from G.Brown.

6.6

7/18/17 JU Further research regarding ethical obligations in light ofallegations by Defendant's counsel.

7.0

7/19/17 JU Further research on ethical issues raised by Defendant'scounsel's allegations; draft memorandum re same; discusssuggested course of action with K. Shenkman.

8.1

7/19/17 KIS Discuss ethics issue with J. Jones. 0.4

7/21/17 KIS Research for oppositions to motions to compel furtherresponses to special interrogatories, and review responses andsupplements for same.

6.3

7/24/17 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions to compelfurther responses to special interrogatories to Loya and PNA

4.0

7/25/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with D. Ely, A. Gonzalez and A.Alarcon regarding T. Vazquez and case generally.

5.9

7/26/17 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions to compelfurther responses to special interrogatories

7.2

7/27/17 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions to compelfurther responses to special interrogatories to Loya and PNAand associated papers.

7.5

7/28/17 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions to compelfurther responses to special interrogatories to Loya and PNAand associated papers

8.4

7/31/17 MRH Revise opposition papers in response to MTCs specialinterrogatories

2.0

7/31/17 KIS Revise oppositions to motions to compel further responses tospecial interrogatories; drafting ancillary papers includingseparate statements

7.3

8/1/17 KIS Revise oppositions to motions to compel further responses tospecial interrogatories; drafting ancillary papers for same.

6.5

8/2/17 KIS Finalize papers in opposition to motions to compel furtherresponses to special interrogatories (Loya and PNA) andcoordinate submission to discovery referee.

3.8

8/4/17 JU Speak to Santa Monica residents regarding P. O'Connor andinvestigate leads.

7.0

8/7/17 JU Further investigation for O'Connor deposition and discuss withK. Shenkman

5.8

8/8/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's writ petition, discuss with J. Bickford, M.Hughes, M. Fahey and R. Rubin

2.9

8/8/17 MRH Read Santa Monica petition for writ of mandamus and discusspotential response with K. Shenkman

2.0

8/9/17 KIS Research issues in writ petition and formulate outline fordelighted letter

6.5

8/10/17 KIS Review findings of O'Connor investigation for deposition anddiscuss with R. Parris.

1.0

8/11/17 KIS Meet with 0. de la Torre regarding O'Connor deposition, travelto/from O'Connor deposition (until learning that she walkedout),

1.8

8/12/17 KIS Research and drafting correspondence to discovery refereeregarding O'Connor walking out of deposition.

4.9

8/13/17 KIS Research and drafting delighted letter in opposition to writpetition.

5.6

8/13/17 MRH Review and revise preliminary opposition to writ petition. 0.6

8/14/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de Ia Torre and M. Loyaregarding case and next depositions and continuing publicefforts

4.6

8/15/17 KIS Read O'Connor deposition transcript and discuss motion tocompel with R. Parris and J. Douglass

1.3

8/16/17 KIS Research, review and revise motion to compel deposition of P.O'Connor, review correspondence regarding O'Connor walkout and discuss same with R. Parris and J. Douglass.

4.8

8/18/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de Ia Torre and E. Sanchez inOceanside regarding public outreach on voting rights anddistrict elections and coordinating SoCal efforts.

8.9

8/21/17 KIS Conference call with Defendant's counsel regarding O'Connordeposition walkout; discuss with R. Parris before and after call.

1.8

8/22/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel furtherresponses to RFAs, call with R. Rubin re: same

7.2

8/23/17 KIS Review order denying Defendant's writ petition and discusssame with local press.

1.4

8/24/17 KIS Prepare for and participate in conference call with discoveryreferee regarding O'Connor walkout

1.1

8/24/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with T. Crane and P. Brock regardingcase, local support and current/former council members.

3.6

8/25/17 KIS Travel to/from and attend discovery referee hearing regardingmotion to compel further responses to special interrogatoriesdirected to M. Loya and PNA, discussion with M. Grimesthereafter.

5.3

8/26/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel furtherresponses to RFAs and form interrogatory 17.1

5.9

8/27/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel furtherresponses to RFAs and associated papers

6.4

8/28/17 MRH Review PNA membership documents, discuss with 0. de laTorre and draft declaration to resolve issues concerningdiscovery requests to PNA.

4.8

8/28/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel furtherresponses to RFAs and associated papers

6.0

8/29/17 MRH Revise opposition to MTC RFAs. 2.58/29/17 KIS Revise papers in opposition to motion to compel further

responses to RFAs, and research/deal with Defendant'sbelated withdrawal of a portion of that motion.

6.7

8/30/17 KIS Revise and finalize all papers for opposition to motion tocompel further RFA responses.

4.6

8/30/17 KIS Work on survey script 1.48/31/17 AAA Review and revise survey script 0.59/1/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's motion for protective order and

opposition to motion to compel deposition of P. O'Connor,and discuss same with J. Douglass.

1.9

9/1/17 AAA Research SM commissioners and draft summary memo 2.8

9/5/17 KIS Evaluate rulings of discovery referee, discuss same with R.Parris, compare correspondence from Defendant's counsel todetermine action regarding de la Torre declaration.

1.5

9/6/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's petition for review from Cal. SupremeCourt and discuss same and responsive course of action withM. Hughes and J. Bickford

2.3

9/6/17 MRH Read petition for review of denial of writ petition and discusswith K. Shenkman

1.8

9/6/17 AAA Review First Amended Complaint, Rulings of the DiscoveryReferees, Special Interrogatories and Responses; Initiate Draftfor Supplemental Responses to SM's Special Interrogatoriesper Referee Rulings; Initiate Draft of Special Interrogatories,Set One from PNA to SM.

5.7

9/7/17 KIS Research for answer to petition for review, and researchtiming of petition and completeness of submission.

6.0

9/7/17 AM Call with KS to discuss PNA's Special Interrogatories to SM andbegin drafting

1.4

9/8/17 KIS Review Defendant's papers and discovery referee ruling todetermine scope of remaining disputes and draftcorrespondence regarding same and call with Defendant'scounsel re same; review Defendant's reply in support of itsmotions to compel RFA responses.

3.5

9/8/17 AM Research Santa Monica electoral history and incorporateelection information into draft of PNA's Special Interrogatoriesto SM

3.7

9/9/17 KIS Research, review and revise opposition to motion forprotective order and reply in support of motion to compeldeposition of P. O'Connor

3.9

9/10/17 KIS Research, review and revise opposition to motion forprotective order and reply in support of motion to compeldeposition of P. O'Connor

4.7

9/10/17 AAA Finalize draft of special interrogatories from PNA to SM (187Special Interrogatories).

3.6

9/11/17 KIS Draft supplemental responses to special interrogatoriesconsistent with discovery referee ruling, and draft additionalinterrogatories based on view expressed in discovery refereeruling.

6.9

9/11/17 AAA Review special interrogatory responses from K. Shenkman 0.5

9/12/17 KIS Research and drafting answer to petition for review 8.5

9/12/17 AAA Continue preparing draft supplemental responses; draftadditional SROGs re: city atty's legal advice to CM's & CharterReview Commission.

3.5

9/13/17 KIS Research and drafting answer to petition for review 7.9

9/14/17 KIS Research and drafting answer to petition for review 8.09/14/17 AAA Research and confirm historical candidates' ethnicities. 1.8

9/17/17 KIS Review Defendant's reply brief in support of motions tocompel RFA responses, research issue therein, and prepare forhearing on same.

3.8

9/18/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing with discoveryreferee regarding RFAs and form intrerrogatory 17.1, researchregarding mootness of discovery motions thereafter inresponse to issue that arose at hearing.

7.0

9/19/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel RFPresponses.

7.8

9/19/17 AAA Finish draft supplemental responses 3.2

9/20/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel RFPresponses.

7.1

9/21/17 KIS Review Defendant's reply in support of motion for protectiveorder and discuss with R. Parris.

0.8

9/22/17 MRH Discuss petition for review with K. Shenkman and work onorganization.

2.2

9/22/17 KIS Research and drafting answer to petition for review; discusswith M. Hughes.

7.6

9/23/17 MRH Research and drafting sections of opposition to MTC furtherresponses to document requests

6.5

9/23/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel RFPresponses.

7.0

9/24/17 MRH Research and draft letter brief regarding entitlement to aruling on submitted motions to compel.

5.8

9/24/17 MRH Work on opposition to petition for review to Cal. S. Ct. 4.69/24/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to compel RFP

responses.6.2

9/25/17 KIS Travel to/from and attend hearing with discovery referee onO'Connor deposition motions, meeting re case generally andO'Connor thereafter with R. Parris et al.

5.3

9/25/17 AM Draft supplemental responses to RFAs and form rogs 3.1

9/25/17 MRH Research and draft letter brief regarding entitlement to aruling on submitted motions to compel.

3.3

9/25/17 MRH Work on opposition to petition for review to Cal. S. Ct. 4.39/26/17 MRH Revise opposition to petition for review. 2.0

9/26/17 KIS Revise answer to petition for review and gather exhibits forsame.

5.6

9/27/17 KIS Revise and finalize Answer to petition for review to the Cal.Supreme Court

4.7

9/28/17 KIS Research and drafting opposition and ancillary papers inresponse to motion to compel RFP responses.

6.6

9/28/17 MRH Revise opposition to MTC further responses to RFPs, discusswith K. Shenkman

2.5

9/29/17 MRH Finalize papers in opposition to Defendant's motion to compelfurther responses to document requests.

3.9

9/30/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Bailer and L. Ho regardingSanta Monica and Santa Clara cases and coordination of same.

13.8

10/3/17 KIS Draft further supplemental responses to specialinterrogatories consistent with discovery referee ruling, anddraft supplemental responses to form interrogatoriesconsistent with discussions and likely rulings of discoveryreferee, and draft supplemental responses to RFAs consistentwith discovery referee rulings.

5.4

10/6/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply brief in support of its motions tocompel RFP responses, and Defendant's letter brief regardingwithdrawal of a portion of its motion to compel RFAresponses.

1.1

10/8/17 KIS Prepare for discovery referee hearing on Defendant's motionsto compel RFP responses.

2.7

10/9/17 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on Defendant'smotions to compel RFP responses.

5.0

10/11/17 MRH Review Defendant's reply in support of its petition for review,discuss with K. Shenkman

1.2

10/11/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply in support of petition for review toCal. Supreme Court, discuss same with M. Hughes, researchcases cited therein.

2.1

10/12/17 KIS Evaluate discovery referee ruling on motions re O'Connordeposition walkout; field inquiries from local Santa Monicapress and LA Times and regarding same and case generally.

2.5

10/16/17 MRH Research and investigate disparities and disparate treatmentof Pico Neighborhood and minority residents.

7.4

10/17/17 MRH Research and investigate disparities and disparate treatmentof Pico Neighborhood and minority residents.

8.2

10/17/17 KIS Evaluate discovery referee amended ruling re RFAs and directcorresponding action, and discovery referee directiveconcerning additional briefing; initial research for additionalbriefing.

3.5

10/18/17 MRH Research and investigate disparities and disparate treatmentof Pico Neighborhood and minority residents.

5.5

10/19/17 MRH Research and investigate disparities and disparate treatmentof Pico Neighborhood and minority residents; prepare guideand summary of wellbeing report

6.3

10/21/17 KIS Evaluate order denying petition for review, discuss same withlocal press.

1.0

10/23/17 KIS Investigate campaign contribution violations in light ofreporting re FPPC fine; research ability to take seconddepositions; direct M. Cussimonio re same.

5.0

10/23/17 KIS Calls with R. Rubin regarding settlement potential andpossibilities.

1.1

10/24/17 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardingdepositions, discuss with R. Parris, and research issueidentified therein.

3.9

10/27/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with Mr. and Mrs. Holbrookregarding case generally and 1992 decision; investigate councilmember corruption issues identified at meeting.

8.7

10/28/17 KIS Investigate council member finances. 4.8

10/29/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with P. Brock and C. Matthewsregarding case, council members and local effort

4.4

10/30/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with PNA board regarding case,council member revelations and path forward.

3.9

11/1/17 KIS Research regarding legal standard for leave to take seconddepositions, and formulate argument for same

5.7

11/2/17 KIS Research and drafting letter to discovery referee re seekingsubsequent depositions of T. O'Day and G. Davis in light ofFPPC fines.

4.8

11/6/17 KIS Draft additional interrogatory 0.3

11/7/17 KIS Further research regarding propriety of subsequentdepositions and relevancy of campaign spending,contributions and fundraising to RPV analysis and 14028(e)factors; discuss same with J. Douglass.

6.1

11/7/17 KIS Call with M. Kousser regarding ER and El results and RPVanalysis.

1.4

11/7/17 AAA Coordinate with M. Kousser and research regarding intent,correspondence with Santa Monica Historical Museum

2.0

11/10/17 AAA Coordinate with Santa Monica Historical Museum to getmaterials.

0.8

11/14/17 KIS Assist LA County DA with investigation of Santa Monicacorruption uncovered in investigation and depositions, asrequested.

2.4

11/15/17 AAA Research at the Santa Monica Library directed by M. Kousser 9.5

11/16/17 KIS Travel to/from and attend N.E. Neighbors meeting to providecommunity with update on case and support organizingefforts; respond to inquiries of local press regardingstatements concerning council corruption.

5.5

11/16/17 AAA Research at the Santa Monica Library directed by M. Kousser 8.7

11/17/17 KIS Evaluate Defendant's supplemental brief in support of itsmotion to compel further responses to RFPs; initial researchfor supplemental opposition; discuss with M. Hughes.

3.0

11/17/17 MRH Read supplemental papers submitted by Defendant regardingdiscovery motion and discuss with K. Shenkman

1.8

11/20/17 KIS Research, draft and revise supplemental papers in oppositionto motion to compel further responses to RFPs

7.5

11/21/17 MRH Review and revise supplemental opposition to MTC responsesto document requests.

2.0

11/21/17 KIS Revise supplemental papers in opposition to motion to compelfurther responses to RFPs

4.5

11/22/17 KIS Evaluate correspondence from K. Scolnick regarding discoveryresponses and discovery referee rulings; compare responses

3.3

with direction from discovery referee to determineappropriate reaction.

11/28/17 KIS Review discovery referee rulings and supplemental responsesin preparation for conference with Defendants' counsel, andparticipate in conference.

2.8

11/29/17 AAA Review research from Santa Monica library and historicalmuseum and draft outline summary for M. Kousser

5.5

11/30/17 KIS Review Defendant's supplemental reply in support of motionto compel further responses to RFPs, research new issues andevidence raised in supplemental reply, and back -and -forthabout submitting a surreply and/or having a further hearing.

2.9

12/2/17 KIS Travel to/from and meet with A. Gonzalez regarding T.Vazquez and his place in case narrative.

5.3

12/4/17 KIS Research and drafting motion to compel subsequentdepositions of G. Davis and T. O'Day.

4.6

12/5/17 KIS Research and drafting motion to compel subsequentdepositions of G. Davis and T. O'Day.

4.9

12/6/17 KIS Research and drafting motion to compel and associatedpapers seeking subsequent depositions of G. Davis and T.O'Day.

6.0

12/8/17 KIS Revise and finalize motion to compel subsequent depositionsof G. Davis and T. O'Day and associated papers.

1.8

12/11/17 KIS Prepare for and participate in telephonic hearing withdiscovery referee regarding Defendant's motion to compelfurther responses to RFPs

2.6

12/11/17 AAA Research at Santa Monica Library regarding chartercommissions.

7.0

12/12/17 KIS Review Defendant's responses to discovery requests anddiscuss same with J. Douglass for preparation of meet -and -confer letter.

2.0

12/12/17 AAA Review research and draft memorandum for M. Kousserregarding charter commissions

4.5

12/13/17 KIS Call with M. Kousser regarding ER and El results and RPVanalysis.

1.3

12/14/17 KIS Review and revise meet -and -confer letter 1.8

12/15/17 KIS Evaluate notice regarding change in counsel for Defendant;discuss same with M. Hughes and R. Rubin, and investigatenew counsel.

2.6

12/15/17 AAA Appointment at SM History Museum for research on SM 6.8

12/18/17 KIS Research regarding assertion of Fifth Amendment in civilaction by party -affiliated witness and consequences inCalifornia and federal cases.

5.0

12/19/17 KIS Evaluate correspondence from Defendant's counsel regardingdiscovery disputes and unavailability to meet and confer;research regarding 45 -day deadline on motion to compel andfailure to participate in meet and confer process andcoordinate with M. Cussimonio regarding relevant dates.

3.0

12/20/17 KIS Research regarding effect of prior order on 45 -day deadline,direct co -counsel on approach in light of research andDefendant's tact.

4.2

12/20/17 KIS Research regarding Fifth Amendment and further investigationregarding T. Vazquez and Santa Monica governmentcorruption; draft correspondence requesting subsequentdeposition of T. Vazquez and explaining basis therefor.

5.7

12/22/17 KIS Evaluate correspondence from K. Scolnick; research Rule 5-100issue raised in K. Scolnick's letter.

4.3

12/23/17 KIS Research and drafting motion for subsequent deposition of T.Vazquez

5.6

12/25/17 KIS Research and drafting motion for subsequent deposition of T.Vazquez

1.2

12/26/17 KIS Research and drafting motion for subsequent deposition of T.Vazquez

3.9

12/27/17 KIS Research and drafting motion for subsequent deposition of T.Vazquez

4.7

12/28/17 KIS Research, drafting and revising motion to compel furtherresponses to special interrogatories

6.0

12/28/17 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 5.7

12/29/17 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 5.4

12/29/17 KIS Research, drafting and revising motion to compel furtherresponses to special interrogatories and associated papers

6.4

1/2/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with 0. de la Torre and M. Loyaregarding case generally, settlement idea, and how to pursueresolution.

4.0

1/2/18 KIS Research and drafting motion for subsequent deposition of T.Vazquez

5.2

1/3/18 MRH Revise and finalize MTC subsequent deposition of T. Vazquez. 3.7

1/4/18 KIS Revise and finalize motion to compel further responses tospecial interrogatories and associated papers

5.6

1/5/18 KIS Research regarding inclusion of multi -member districts anddiffering election structures within a jurisdiction as remedy forvoting rights violation.

6.5

1/6/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with J. Newman regarding effort tolegislate away Santa Monica CVRA case.

4.4

1/8/18 KIS Research regarding RPV in individual elections for reply toanticipated opposition to motion to compel specialinterrogatory responses.

4.8

1/9/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's opposition to motion for subsequentdepositions of G. Davis and T. O'Day and formulate reply;correspondence regarding discovery motion briefing andscheduling.

2.1

1/10/18 KIS Research and drafting reply in support of subsequentdepositions of O'Day and Davis.

6.0

1/11/18 KIS Research and drafting reply in support of subsequentdepositions of O'Day and Davis.

7.7

1/12/18 KIS Research and drafting reply in support of subsequentdepositions of O'Day and Davis.

5.4

1/15/18 MRH Review moving and opposition papers regarding subsequentdepositions of council members, discuss with K. Shenkman andrevise reply

3.8

1/15/18 KIS Revising reply in support of subsequent depositions of O'Dayand Davis.

4.0

1/15/18 KIS Correspondence with M. Barreto and LatinoDecisions team,and talk to A. Gonzalez about problems with Barreto et al.

1.2

1/16/18 KIS Finalize reply papers for motion seeking subsequentdepositions of O'Day and Davis.

3.2

1/16/18 AAA Follow up regarding CPRA request and coordinate with K.Shenkman and M. Kousser

0.9

1/17/18 KIS Interview with potential polling expert, and follow up withscope and survey outline.

2.4

1/18/18 KIS Research regarding legality of potential settlement proposal;discuss same with clients and affected constituents.

6.6

1/19/18 KIS Research regarding legality of potential settlement proposalsand confer with experts regarding likely remedialeffectiveness; lobby clients and affected constituents forsupport for same.

7.5

1/22/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing regarding motion for subsequent depositions of O'Dayand Davis.

5.0

1/23/18 MRH Read discovery oppositions submitted by Defendant anddiscuss responses with K. Shenkman

1.9

1/23/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's oppositions to motions to compelsubsequent deposition of T. Vazquez and further responses tospecial interrogatories, and initial research for reply; discusswith M. Hughes.

4.9

1/24/18 KIS Research and drafting reply in support of motion forsubsequent deposition of T. Vazquez; conference with E.Gordon regarding reply in support of motion to compel specialinterrogatory responses.

6.8

1/25/18 KIS Research and drafting reply in support of motion forsubsequent deposition of T. Vazquez

6.0

1/26/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with Pico Neighborhood activistsincluding most of PNA board.

4.1

1/26/18 KIS Review draft survey text and discuss with J. Brown 1.0

1/27/18 KIS Research and drafting reply in support of motion forsubsequent deposition of T. Vazquez

5.7

1/28/18 MRH Review moving and opposition papers, discuss with K.Shenkman and revise reply regarding T. Vazquez deposition

3.0

1/28/18 KIS Research, drafting and revising reply in support of motion forsubsequent deposition of T. Vazquez

5.9

1/29/18 MRH Review and revise reply in support of MTC specialinterrogatories.

5.1

1/29/18 KIS Revise replies in support motions to compel T. Vazquezdeposition and further responses to interrogatories

4.5

1/29/18 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding settlement possibilities 0.5

1/30/18 KIS Finalize replies in support of discovery motions -interrogatories and T. Vazquez deposition - and deal withdispute over subpoena of M. Leon -Vazquez.

5.2

1/31/18 KIS Prepare for and participate in conference with Defendant'scounsel regarding deposition and subpoena of M. Leon -Vazquez

0.9

2/1/18 MRH Calls with Santa Monica activists regarding T. Wintererbusiness dealings etc., and summarize for K. Shenkman fordeposition.

4.3

2/1/18 KIS Investigation / preparation for T. Winterer deposition. 6.1

2/2/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing on Defendant's motion to compel further responses tospecial interrogatories, and review rulings from discoveryreferee concerning document requests.

6.5

2/3/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with G. Ramos and 0. de la Torreregarding council member misconduct and campaign finance.

5.4

2/5/18 MRH Research regarding mediation privilege and confidentiality,and applicability to non -participating members of a governingboard; discuss with K. Shenkman

6.2

2/5/18 KIS Research regarding availability of multi -member districtremedies and applicability of equal protection to remediesthat treat different districts differently in light of Bush v Gore

7.4

2/6/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing regarding subsequent T. Vazquez deposition andPlaintiff's motion to compel further responses tointerrogatories.

6.0

2/7/18 KIS Investigation / preparation for T. Winterer deposition. 5.92/8/18 MRH Research and drafting mediation brief. 9.32/8/18 KIS Correspondence and call with K. Scolnick regarding mediation

and stand -down agreement; research sufficiency ofDefendant's proposal regarding same; discussion with J. Krivisregarding mediation scheduling.

4.8

2/8/18 AAA Review video obtained from CPRA request 2.2

2/9/18 AAA Finish watching council meeting video and draft time linkedsummary

5.3

2/9/18 MRH Research and drafting mediation brief. 8.92/9/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with G. Ramos, 0. de la Torre, A.

Elmahrek and B. Oreskes regarding campaign finance andcouncil member dealings.

4.0

2/10/18 MRH Research and drafting mediation brief. 8.42/10/18 KIS Work on mediation brief with M. Hughes, and research

remedies for potential violation of mediation confidentiality todetermine appropriate level of detail to provide toDefendant's counsel in advance of mediation.

9.5

2/11/18 MRH Research and drafting mediation brief. 7.8

2/11/18 KIS Work on mediation brief with M. Hughes, and correspondencewith K. Scolnick regarding sneak preview of settlement offer

5.5

2/12/18 MRH Research and drafting mediation brief. 7.1

2/12/18 AAA Compile research regarding SM commissioners and send to K.Shenkman.

0.6

2/12/18 KIS Revise mediation brief and discuss with M. Hughes. 4.7

2/13/18 MRH Revise and finalize mediation brief. 2.8

2/13/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with R. Tahvildaran-Jessweinregarding SMRR and case generally.

2.5

2/13/18 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding settlement authority 0.5

2/14/18 KIS Conversations with clients, co -counsel and interested partiesto secure buy -in for mediation strategy.

2.6

2/15/18 KIS Discussions with clients and co -counsel regarding mediationand likely effectiveness of various remedies and range ofproposals acceptable to clients.

3.3

2/16/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend mediation; meetingwith clients and co -counsel thereafter.

8.5

2/16/18 AM Mediation and team meeting 7.1

2/19/18 KIS Evaluate motion for protective order / quash subpoena toprevent deposition of M. Leon -Vazquez; research foropposition.

5.0

2/20/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to M. Leon -Vazquez motion 6.62/21/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to M. Leon -Vazquez motion 7.3

2/22/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to M. Leon -Vazquez motion;evaluate second amended ruling from discovery refereeregarding RFAs

7.1

2/23/18 MRH Revise and finalize opposition to motion for protective orderregarding M. Leon -Vazquez.

2.4

2/23/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with PNA board regarding mediation,settlement and case prospects.

4.5

2/25/18 KIS Revise outline and prepare for deposition of T. Winterer 6.32/26/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and take deposition of T. Winterer. 10.22/27/18 KIS Research propriety of seeking clarification through informal

means, and draft correspondence to discovery refereeregarding amended rulings

4.4

2/28/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply in support of its motion to preventdeposition of M. Leon -Vazquez, and deal with press aftermathof Defendant's use of article in its reply.

1.8

3/1/18 KIS Evaluate correspondence from K. Scolnick evidencingDefendant's purpose to use mediation as discovery tool;research regarding what K. Scolnick terms a "coalition theory"in response.

5.2

3/2/18 KIS Research regarding what K. Scolnick terms a "coalitiontheory," sufficiency of pleadings to put Defendant on notice,and propriety of Defendant using mediation as a discoverytool.

7.0

3/3/18 KIS Research regarding what K. Scolnick terms a "coalitiontheory," sufficiency of pleadings to put Defendant on notice,and propriety of Defendant using mediation as a discoverytool; draft correspondence to K. Scolnick regarding same.

3.6

3/5/18 KIS Prepare for discovery referee hearing and discuss with M.Grimes.

3.5

3/6/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing regarding M. Leon -Vazquez deposition, and discussionwith J. Levitt thereafter.

6.9

3/7/18 KIS Call with J. Krivis regarding potential second day of mediationand handling of discovery in the interim; direct team in light ofdiscussion.

1.1

3/8/18 KIS Evaluate discovery referee ruling and direct action in light ofruling, and correspondence regarding depositions.

0.9

3/8/18 AM Contact M. Quinones -Perez and follow up correspondence 1.2

3/9/18 MRH Discuss discovery referee ruling and Defendant's intent tochallenge ruling; research regarding procedure for confirming/ objecting and authority of discovery referee under CCP.

5.7

3/10/18 MRH Research regarding discovery referee authority and procedurefor turning referee rulings into court orders based on authorityfor referee appointment and stipulation; discuss with K.Shenkman.

5.0

3/10/18 KIS Travel to/from (Santa Clarita) and meet with M. Grimes and R.Parris regarding work allocation and case tasks and strategy

3.9

3/12/18 KIS Evaluate discovery referee ruling on T. Vazquez subsequentdeposition, draft correspondence in light of same and researchin order to get prompt depositions.

2.9

3/13/18 KIS Prepare for second mediation; calls with clients and otherinterested parties regarding settlement authority

2.8

3/14/18 KIS Further research regarding available remedies and precedenttherefor in advance of second mediation, discussion with J.Levitt re same and L. Dilg.

6.6

3/15/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend second day ofmediation; team meeting with all counsel thereafter.

7.4

3/15/18 AAA Mediation and team meeting 5.0

3/16/18 AAA Contact M. Perez and M. Quinones -Perez to obtaincooperation

1.0

3/16/18 KIS Work with D. Ely, M. Kousser and J. Levitt on respectiveopinions and reports in light of Defendant's refusal to engagein settlement discussions.

9.8

3/19/18 MRH Review correspondence from K. Scolnick; research discoveryreferee authority and procedure in light of issues raisedtherein; discuss course of action with K. Shenkman

4.1

3/19/18 KIS Work with D. Ely and M. Kousser on respective opinions andreports in light of Defendant's refusal to engage in settlementdiscussions.

9.2

3/20/18 MRH Work on demographics and election recreation report with D.Ely.

6.5

3/21/18 MRH Read and summarize T. Winterer deposition transcript forteam and separate summary for press.

6.8

3/21/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Grimes and W. Ouchiregarding work allocation and case generally.

5.4

3/22/18 KIS Review correspondence from H. Galloway regardingdeposition notices and objections, and direct action inresponse; deal with deposition scheduling and objectionissues; draft correspondence regarding same.

1.9

3/23/18 AAA Analysis of SM commissioners, current and historical 1.0

3/26/18 AAA Analysis of SM commissioners, current and historical 4.4

3/26/18 KIS Investigation for R. Cole deposition. 7.7

3/26/18 KIS Finalize survey script and discuss sampling with 1. Brown 0.8

3/27/18 MRH Research and drafting ex parte application to confirmdiscovery referee rulings.

5.3

3/27/18 KIS Investigate R. Cole role in Pasadena district election campaign,political career and actions in Santa Monica; begin preparingoutline for R. Cole deposition.

6.9

3/28/18 MRH Research and drafting ex parte application to confirmdiscovery referee rulings.

4.9

3/28/18 AAA Analysis of SM commissioners, current and historical andprepare spreadsheet

3.7

3/28/18 KIS Calls with Santa Monica activists concerning R. Cole andpotential deposition inquiries; preparing outline for depositionand coordinate with W. Ouchi

4.8

3/28/18 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding MSJ 0.3

3/29/18 MRH Read summary judgment papers and discuss with K. Shenkman 3.4

3/29/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with K. Scolnick and T. Henryregarding deposition scheduling and court review of discoveryreferee rulings in advance of depositions; quick review of MSJand discuss with M. Hughes and A. Alarcon.

4.9

3/30/18 MRH Review discovery referee rulings regarding subsequentdepositions of T. Vazquez, G. Davis and T. O'Day, and motionto quash deposition subpoena to M. Leon -Vazquez; researchand drafting ex parte application to confirm discovery refereerulings.

6.8

3/30/18 AAA Revise commissioner study and spreadsheet 1.7

3/30/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and take deposition of R. Cole. 9.9

3/31/18 KIS Evaluate MSJ and associated papers, circulate to experts andco -counsel; discuss same and allocation of work foropposition.

4.5

3/31/18 MRH Revise ex parte application to confirm discovery refereerulings in light of Defendant's counsel's indication they wouldnot comply with objection deadline.

3.1

4/1/18 MRH Research issues identified in Defendant's summary judgmentmotion, discuss with K. Shenkman

7.0

4/1/18 KIS Review MSJ papers; pull cases and research for opposition;coordinate with M. Hughes and R. Rubin.

7.3

4/2/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ 5.8

4/2/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 9.2

4/2/18 KIS Review and revise ex parte papers to confirm discoveryreferee ruling, correspondence regarding same

3.4

4/3/18 AAA Research regarding communications to discovery referee bynon-parties in response to S. Martini email.

4.1

4/3/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ 4.8

4/3/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on ex parteapplication to confirm discovery referee rulings.

5.9

4/4/18 AAA Research regarding right to distribute discovery materials anddeposition transcripts absent a court order to the contrary andappropriate response to communication to discovery refereeby S. Martini email.

2.6

4/4/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser, focusing on Prop 3 and1975

8.5

4/4/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ 6.2

4/4/18 KIS Research and work with D. Ely and M. Kousser for oppositionto MSJ

7.8

4/4/18 KIS Correspondence regarding yesterday's ex parte hearing andorder; evaluate timing and enforcement potential of order.

0.6

4/5/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ and draft issue memoranda 7.04/5/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser, focusing on 1975,

1990, 1991 and 1992, and compile documents for M. Kousser9.9

4/5/18 KIS Research and work with D. Ely and M. Kousser for oppositionto MSJ

9.2

4/5/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Grimes and W. Ouchi toallocate work and case strategy generally

4.4

4/6/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ and draft issue memoranda 7.44/6/18 KIS Work on materials that will be necessary for summary

judgment opposition, meet with M. Grimes and talk with J.Levitt (separately) to coordinate same.

8.3

4/6/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's objection to discovery referee rulingregarding M. Leon -Vazquez deposition; communicate withpress regarding Defendant's complaint that we communicatewith the press.

2.9

4/7/18 KIS Call with R. Rubin regarding MSJ 0.34/9/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ and draft issue memoranda 6.54/9/18 AAA Compile research regarding intent analysis for M. Kousser and

K. Shenkman4.8

4/9/18 KIS Research and work with D. Ely and M. Kousser for oppositionto MSJ

8.4

4/10/18 MRH Research, draft and revise opposition to ex parte application. 6.74/10/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to ex parte application for

reconsideration.7.9

4/10/18 KIS Call with J. Levitt regarding MSJ opposition. 0.6

4/11/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ and draft issue memorandaand outline opposition sections.

7.6

4/11/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on ex parteapplication for reconsideration of court's confirmation ofdiscovery referee rulings.

6.2

4/11/18 KIS Call with M. Kousser regarding ER and El results and RPV

analysis and needed work on intent and impact analysis0.5

4/12/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ and draft issue memoranda 7.8

4/12/18 KIS Research regarding timing of MSJ and consequences of latefiling or improper service and work on opposition to MSJ

8.3

4/12/18 AAA Research at SM Library, focusing on 2002 and election methodproposition

7.1

4/13/18 AAA Research at SM Library, focusing on 2002 and election methodproposition; compile research for M. Kousser and K.Shenkman; meet with potential witness regarding ballotproposition

8.9

4/13/18 MRH Research for opposition to MSJ and draft issue memoranda 7.5

4/13/18 KIS Research regarding timing of MSJ and consequences of latefiling or improper service and procedure for addressing samewithout waiving defect.

6.9

4/14/18 KIS Research and drafting motions in limine 5.5

4/15/18 KIS Research and drafting motions in limine 6.3

4/16/18 MRH Discuss potential motions in limine with K. Shenkman andresearch for same.

6.8

4/16/18 AAA Compile and prepare materials for meeting, meet with K.Shenkman and M. Kousser

6.7

4/16/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Kousser and A. Alarconregarding intent case

7.0

4/16/18 KIS Research and drafting response to Defendants objection todiscovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

6.4

4/17/18 MRH Research for potential motions in limine 7.44/17/18 KIS Research and drafting response to Defendant's objection to

discovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

5.5

4/17/18 KIS Prepare sample responses to interrogatories and RFAs to PNAand M. Loya, and discuss same with E. Gordon.

2.1

4/17/18 AM Contact potential witness regarding T. Vazquez funding. 0.24/17/18 AM Review M. Kousser 1992 report and cross-reference to recent

research and materials1.7

4/18/18 MRH Research for potential motions in limine; draft memorandumsummarizing potential motions in limine.

8.9

4/18/18 KIS Research and drafting response to Defendant's objection todiscovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

3.9

4/19/18 MRH Research for potential motions in limine; draft memorandumsummarizing potential motions in limine.

6.6

4/19/18 AM Research regarding 1946 SM and freeholders 2.2

4/19/18 KIS Research and drafting response to Defendant's objection todiscovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquez deposition

and associated papers.

4.3

4/20/18 MRH Revise and finalize response papers regarding M. Leon-Vazquez deposition.

2.8

4/20/18 AAA Research at SM Library, focusing on 1946 charter and sourcematerials.

9.7

4/20/18 KIS Revise response to objection to discovery referee ruling. 2.4

4/21/18 KIS Investigate P. O'Connor votes, campaigns and finances; talkwith constituents re same.

7.3

4/22/18 KIS Further investigate P. O'Connor for deposition; draft outlinefor deposition.

7.9

4/23/18 KIS Travel to/from and attend deposition of P. O'Connor, and casemeeting thereafter.

10.8

4/23/18 AAA Review and organize research documents from SM Library forM. Kousser and K. Shenkman

3.6

4/24/18 MRH Work with D. Ely on report for MSJ opposition. 7.1

4/24/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MS1 6.9

4/24/18 KIS Evaluate survey results and crosstabs and discuss with J.Brown

2.9

4/25/18 MRH Work with M. Kousser on report for MS1 opposition. 8.7

4/25/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ 7.5

4/26/18 MRH Work with M. Kousser on report for MSJ opposition. 8.3

4/26/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ 7.4

4/27/18 MRH Work with M. Kousser on report for MS1 opposition. 8.0

4/27/18 KIS Read and summarize transcript of O'Connor deposition,communicate with press regarding O'Connor business

5.9

4/30/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with A. Sanchez, D. Ely and A. Alarconin Sherman Oaks regarding Vazquez shakedown of laborunions and case generally.

3.7

4/30/18 AAA Meeting with D. Ely, K. Shenkman and A. Sanchez 2.5

5/1/18 KIS Evaluate correspondence from K. Scolnick regarding M. Leon-Vazquez deposition, discovery referee ruling and Defendant'sobjection; research and draft correspondence in response.

3.8

5/2/18 KIS Deposition preparation with 0. de la Torre and M. Loya 6.6

5/3/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte application to confirmdiscovery referee ruling / advance hearing date for objectionregarding discovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

5.2

5/4/18 MRH Read Defendant's motion to stay, discuss with K. Shenkmanand begin formulating response.

4.6

5/4/18 KIS Deposition preparation with 0. de la Torre 4.95/4/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's motion to stay deposition of M. Leon-

Vazquez; discuss response with M. Hughes.3.5

5/5/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte application to confirmdiscovery referee ruling / advance hearing date for objection

4.8

regarding discovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

5/6/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition to motion to stay M. Leon-Vazquez deposition.

6.1

5/6/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition papers to MSJ, coordinatewith M. Kousser re same and report

9.6

5/7/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition to motion to stay M. Leon-Vazquez deposition.

4.2

5/7/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte application to confirmdiscovery referee ruling / advance hearing date for objectionregarding discovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

3.8

5/8/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition to motion to stay M. Leon-Vazquez deposition.

5.1

5/8/18 KIS Deposition preparation with 0. de la Torre 4.5

5/9/18 MRH Work with D. Ely on report for MSJ opposition, review P.Morrison declaration and determine whether deposition iswarranted.

6.7

5/9/18 KIS Travel to/from and defend deposition of 0. de la Torre,meeting with 0. de la Torre thereafter.

11.7

5/10/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte application to confirmdiscovery referee ruling / advance hearing date for objectionregarding discovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquezdeposition.

5.4

5/10/18 KIS Correspondence with Defendant's counsel regardingdeposition scheduling and ex parte.

1.0

5/11/18 MRH Research for MSJ opposition 6.6

5/11/18 KIS Prepare for and travel to hearing on ex parte applicationregarding discovery referee ruling and objection thereto

4.0

5/11/18 KIS Defend PMK deposition of PNA, and travel from. 6.75/12/18 MRH Work with M. Kousser on report for MS.1 opposition. 9.25/12/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ and supporting

papers.9.0

5/13/18 MRH Research and drafting separate statement response foropposition to MSJ.

8.4

5/13/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ, discuss same with J.Levitt.

8.3

5/14/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition and separate statementresponse for opposition to MSJ.

7.5

5/14/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ, coordinate with D.Ely to get necessary information and analysis to J. Levitt.

8.9

5/14/18 KIS Deposition preparation with M. Loya, and back -and -forth withDefendant's counsel regarding various deposition anddiscovery matters.

7.9

5/15/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition and separate statementresponse for opposition to MSJ.

7.0

5/15/18 KIS Travel to/from and defend deposition of M. Loya, meetingwith 0. de la Torre and M. Loya and call with J. Levittthereafter

10.9

5/16/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 7.7

5/16/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ and supportingdeclarations; call with S. Ferias regarding experiences in SanJuan Capistrano and willingness to submit declaration.

10.4

5/17/18 MRH Discuss experts with K. Shenkman and desirability ofrequesting exchange; draft expert witness exchange demand.

1.0

5/17/18 AAA Work with M. Kousser and D. Ely on their respective reports 5.5

5/18/18 AAA Research for M. Kousser at SM Library 4.8

5/18/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition declarations. 10.3

5/20/18 KIS Travel to/from and participate in tour of Santa Monica for trialpreparation

7.1

5/21/18 MRH Work on MS.1 opposition papers 5.9

5/21/18 KIS Work with M. Kousser on his report and put together sourcematerials for report.

6.2

5/21/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MS.1 4.4

5/22/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 5.7

5/22/18 AM Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 7.2

5/22/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ and discuss samewith J. Levitt and R. Rubin

6.5

5/22/18 KIS Deal with various discovery issues and correspondenceregarding same.

0.9

5/23/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 8.3

5/23/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 9.7

5/23/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on Defendant'sobjection to discovery referee ruling, prepare oppositiondocuments for continued hearing thereafter.

10.3

5/23/18 KIS Deal with various discovery issues and correspondenceregarding same; draft exemplary responses to RFPs regardingexpert survey.

2.6

5/23/18 KIS Work on summary judgment opposition and discuss with J.Levitt.

1.0

5/24/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 9.55/24/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 8.35/24/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ 10.65/24/18 KIS Deal with various discovery issues and correspondence

regarding same; draft exemplary responses to RFPs regardingexpert survey.

1.3

5/25/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 7.85/25/18 AM Conference call with R. Martinez; research Prop. 14, Caucasian

clauses in SM and newspaper evidence of racist attitudes inSM

6.8

5/25/18 KIS Call with R. Martinez for guidance on equal protection case. 1.55/25/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MS1 7.0

5/25/18 KIS Deal with various discovery issues and correspondenceregarding same; draft exemplary responses to RFPs regardingexpert survey.

1.0

5/26/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 6.9

5/26/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 5.3

5/26/18 KIS Review FPPC issue and press coverage and G. Davis depositiontranscript and summary; prepare outline; call regardingquestioning for deposition.

4.9

5/26/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ 6.4

5/27/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 9.2

5/27/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ 10.5

5/28/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 5.6

5/28/18 AAA Research at SM Library for M. Kousser 5.5

5/28/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to MSJ 11.2

5/29/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 5.8

5/29/18 AAA Work on report with M. Kousser 11.4

5/29/18 KIS Revise opposition to MSJ and associated papers. 7.4

5/29/18 KIS Review FPPC issue and press coverage and G. Davis depositiontranscript and summary; prepare outline; call regardingquestioning for deposition.

3.5

5/30/18 MRH Work on MSJ opposition papers 10.5

5/30/18 AAA Work on Kousser report and MSJ opposition. 15.1

5/30/18 KIS Revise and finalize opposition to MSJ and associated papersand discuss with co -counsel

16.2

5/31/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on Defendant'smotion to reverse discovery referee ruling regarding M. Leon -Vazquez.

5.0

5/31/18 KIS Finalize and transmit (consistent with order of the court athearing earlier in the day) opposition to motion for summaryjudgment.

4.9

6/1/18 MRH Work on motions in limine. 7.26/1/18 KIS Correspondence and deal with continuing deposition issues. 0.86/1/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's motion for sanctions, confer with clients

regarding same, address briefing schedule3.9

6/2/18 MRH Work on motions in limine 5.3

6/2/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for sanctions. 7.66/3/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for sanctions and

associated papers.8.2

6/4/18 MRH Research and drafting motions to compel: 1) deposition of M.Quinones -Perez, and 2) production of documents re P.O'Connor

5.4

6/4/18 KIS Research regarding necessity of providing editable version ofseparate statement and timing for doing so.

0.4

6/4/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for sanctions andassociated papers.

6.1

6/5/18 MRH Research regarding depositions of MSJ opposition expertdeclarants and timing thereof, discuss with K. Shenkman todetermine response to T. Henry.

2.5

6/5/18 KIS Deposition preparation with 0. de Ia Torre and gatherdocuments for production at deposition

5.9

6/5/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to sanctions motion. 4.4

6/6/18 MRH Work on motions to compel deposition of M. Quinones -Perezand document production from Kaplan Chen Kaplan.

3.9

6/6/18 KIS Travel to/from and defend deposition of PNA PMK (vol. 2) 7.0

6/7/18 MRH Research and draft objections to reply papers on MSJ 4.3

6/7/18 KIS Santa Monica tour with photographer, M. Grimes and 0. de IaTorre for opening

7.1

6/7/18 KIS Review Defendant's reply papers re MSJ; research and draftobjection to reply separate statement and reply declaration ofP. Morrison, and draft notice of errata

3.8

6/8/18 MRH Research and drafting trial brief; discuss with K. Shenkman 6.3

6/8/18 KIS Formulate rough outline for trial brief and discuss allocationwith M. Hughes

2.9

6/8/18 KIS Revise and finalize notice of errata, and objections to replypapers on Si motion.

1.5

6/8/18 KIS Review, revise and finalize motion to compel deposition of M.Quinones -Perez and motion to compel production ofdocuments from Kaplan Chen Kaplan.

3.5

6/9/18 MRH Work on opposition to motion for sanctions. 4.0

6/9/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to sanctions motion. 8.2

6/10/18 MRH Work on opposition to motion for sanctions. 3.8

6/10/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to sanctions motion. 6.6

6/11/18 MRH Work on opposition to motion for sanctions. 4.7

6/11/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to sanctions motion. 7.5

6/11/18 KIS Drafting expert witness exchange documents, discuss withexperts, and reviewing same from Defendant; deal withDefendant's gripe about timing and manner of exchange

6.3

6/11/18 KIS Travel to/from and speak at N.E. Neighbors meeting regardingcase generally.

4.0

6/12/18 MRH Research regarding need for subpoenas for non-profit boardmembers of a party litigant.

2.2

6/12/18 MRH Research and drafting trial brief 6.4

6/12/18 KIS Review MSJ papers and prepare for hearing. 5.06/12/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion for sanctions. 3.9

6/12/18 KIS Deal with deposition notices and scheduling of PNA boardmembers; discuss with M. Hughes.

0.7

6/12/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions

2.0

6/12/18 KIS Research regarding discovery referee authority to controlschedule; correspondence regarding motion scheduling.

1.5

6/13/18 MRH Review and revise papers in opposition to motion forsanctions.

3.3

6/13/18 AAA Review summary judgment papers and prepare for hearing. 1.8

6/13/18 KIS Revise and finalize opposition and supporting papers onsanctions motion.

2.0

6/13/18 KIS Research and drafting section of trial brief. 4.9

6/13/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's response to objections to reply papers,and prepare for MSJ hearing.

4.4

6/14/18 MRH Research and drafting trial brief 5.6

6/14/18 AA Summary judgment hearing and conference with co -counsel. 5.0

6/14/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from hearing on MSJ; meeting with J.Levitt thereafter; talk with local press, clients and communityactivists thereafter; research regarding 473 motions andwaiver of untimely MSJ.

13.6

6/14/18 KIS Prepare E. Gordon for deposition of T. O'Day. 0.9

6/14/18 KIS Correspondence regarding scheduling of motion re M.Quinones -Perez

0.3

6/15/18 MRH Review Defendant's "motion to reject Plaintiffs' argument";research for opposition; discuss with K. Shenkman

4.5

6/15/18 AAA Review Defendant's 473 motion and discuss with K. Shenkman 0.8

6/15/18 KIS Correspondence regarding scheduling of motion re M.Quinones -Perez; research regarding timing and service on non-party witness represented by counsel who has made anappearance

2.4

6/15/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to Defendant's (sorta) 473motion

5.8

6/15/18 KIS Research regarding expert discovery timing 0.9

6/16/18 MRH Research and drafting section of opposition to Defendant's"motion to reject Plaintiffs' argument"

6.8

6/16/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to Defendant's (sorta) 473motion

10.7

6/16/18 KIS Research regarding demand for electronic files created byattorney, in response to informal demand from K. Scolnick.

2.5

6/17/18 AAA Research regarding Defendant's 473 motion and excusableneglect standard, discuss with K. Shenkman

2.9

6/17/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition to Defendant's "motion toreject Plaintiffs' argument"

7.4

6/17/18 KIS Research, draft, revise opposition to Defendant's (sorta) 473motion

6.3

6/17/18 KIS Deposition preparation with B. Onofre 4.96/17/18 KIS Correspondence regarding deposition locations of B. Onofre

and M. Leon -Vazquez0.2

6/18/18 MRH Revise and finalize opposition to Defendant's "motion to rejectPlaintiffs' argument"; review Adler declaration regardingfailure to timely file 473 motion and discuss with K. Shenkman.

3.5

6/18/18 KIS Revise opposition to Defendant's (sorta) 473 motion andfile/deliver personally at the request of the court; reviewamusing Adler declaration about how he couldn't walk 3blocks to deliver 473 motion so it was not timely filed.

5.8

6/18/18 KIS Deposition preparation with B. Onofre 1.8

6/18/18 KIS Correspondence regarding deposition locations of B. Onofreand M. Leon -Vazquez

0.3

6/18/18 KIS Deal with expert deposition scheduling. 0.7

6/19/18 MRH Work on trial brief 2.5

6/19/18 AAA Compile and summarize cases regarding 473 and Si timing forhearing; attend hearing on Defendant's 473 motion.

6.8

6/19/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on Defendant's(sorta) 473 motion and deposition of B. Onofre.

8.9

6/19/18 KIS Travel to/from and speak at Mid -City Neighborhood Assnmeeting.

3.6

6/19/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions

3.2

6/20/18 MRH Work on trial brief 6.7

6/20/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply in support of motion for sanctionsand prepare for hearing.

3.5

6/20/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions.

4.1

6/20/18 KIS Investigate and review materials on Vazquezes and prepare fordeposition of T. Vazquez and M. Leon -Vazquez

3.3

6/21/18 MRH Work on motions in limine 4.0

6/21/18 MRH Review Defendant's reply in support of motion for sanctions;research prompted by reply; discuss with K. Shenkman

2.5

6/21/18 MRH Research regarding timing and scope of supplemental expertdesignations and discuss with K. Shenkman

4.7

6/21/18 KIS Evaluate reply in support of sanctions motion; discuss with M.Hughes for hearing preparation

3.8

6/21/18 KIS Review materials on Vazquezes and prepare for deposition ofT. Vazquez and M. Leon -Vazquez

2.3

6/21/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions.

3.6

6/21/18 KIS Work on trial brief 2.06/21/18 KIS Evaluate "supplemental" expert designation; research

regarding propriety of supplementation of expert designation;discuss with M. Hughes.

4.1

6/22/18 MRH Review motion to compel further responses to thousands ofdiscovery requests, and associated documents; discuss with K.Shenkman.

2.6

6/22/18 MRH Investigate supplemental expert of Defendant 6.56/22/18 KIS Evaluate motion to compel filed by Defendant on last set of

discovery; discuss with E. Gordon and M. Hughes (separately);correspondence regarding briefing and hearing schedule.

3.0

6/22/18 KIS Work on trial brief 2.8

6/22/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions.

3.1

6/22/18 KIS review materials on Vazquezes and prepare for deposition ofT. Vazquez.

3.2

6/22/18 KIS Deal with / correspondence regarding T. Vazquez refusal toappear for court -ordered deposition; draft and servedeposition notices for R. Miller and A. Sanchez to address T.Vazquez refusal to be deposed.

0.9

6/22/18 KIS Evaluate KCK opposition to motion to compel documents anddiscuss with E. Gordon.

1.0

6/23/18 MRH Research regarding exclusion of late -designated experts andscope of testimony if not excluded altogether.

7.2

6/23/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions.

8.5

6/23/18 KIS Work on trial brief 1.7

6/24/18 MRH Research regarding exclusion of late -designated experts andscope of testimony if not excluded altogether; draft motionoutline.

7.6

6/24/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for expertdepositions.

8.8

6/24/18 KIS Work on trial brief 1.1

6/24/18 KIS Deal with deposition and discovery motion scheduling,correspondence regarding same.

1.5

6/25/18 MRH Investigate Defendant's experts, review prior opinions,testimony and reports.

9.3

6/25/18 KIS Travel to/from deposition (no-show) of T. Vazquez; meetingwith Parris lawyers and staff regarding pretrial tasks.

8.9

6/25/18 KIS Deposition preparation with J. Blake 1.2

6/25/18 KIS Review and revise reply in support of motion to compeldocuments from KCK

4.1

6/25/18 KIS Correspondence back and forth regarding scheduling ofDefendant's motion to compel its thousands of discoveryrequests, and the untimeliness of its motion.

1.0

6/25/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's responses to discovery requests. 1.9

6/26/18 MRH Review expert documents and prepare for production 4.3

6/26/18 MRH Investigate Defendant's experts and supplemental expert 5.06/26/18 KIS Work on trial brief 5.4

6/26/18 KIS Deposition preparation with M. Kousser 5.9

6/26/18 KIS Correspondence regardingi Schloss deposition untimeliness;research regarding consequences of untimeliness andprocedure for addressing same; and discuss need for motionfor protective order with D. Williams

3.7

6/27/18 MRH Work on trial brief 7.06/27/18 AM Preparing trial exhibits 3.86/27/18 MRH Review expert documents and prepare for production. 3.66/27/18 KIS Deposition preparation with G. de Baca 1.6

6/27/18 KIS Investigate M. Leon -Vazquez and prepare for her deposition. 4.56/27/18 KIS Work on trial brief 4.7

6/27/18 KIS Correspondence with discovery referee regarding schedulingand availability of arguments on motion to compel.

0.9

6/28/18 MRH Research and drafting motion for sanctions for T. Vazquezfailure to appear for court -ordered deposition

8.9

6/28/18 MRH Review expert documents and prepare for production. 2.6

6/28/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing on motion for sanctions and motion to compeldocuments from KCK

6.2

6/28/18 KIS Correspondence concerning disputes regarding Schloss,Sanchez and Miller depositions, and research same.

2.0

6/28/18 KIS Investigate M. Leon -Vazquez and prepare for her deposition;discuss with M. Grimes

3.9

6/29/18 MRH Research and drafting motion for sanctions for T. Vazquezfailure to appear for court -ordered deposition

8.5

6/29/18 AAA Preparing trial exhibits 5.7

6/29/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend/take deposition of M.Leon -Vazquez

10.8

6/29/18 KIS Evaluate opposition to motion to compel deposition of M.Quinones -Perez; discuss with E. Gordon.

1.4

6/29/18 KIS Call with J. Levitt in preparation for deposition. 0.5

6/30/18 MRH Research and drafting motion for sanctions for T. Vazquezfailure to appear for court -ordered deposition

5.7

6/30/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 6.0

6/30/18 KIS Evaluate correspondence from C. Villegas to discovery referee;research authority of discovery referee over third -parties inresponse thereto and discuss with E. Gordon how to proceed.

4.3

6/30/18 KIS Deposition preparation with C. McLeod 4.9

6/30/18 KIS Research and drafting part of motion to quash depositionsubpoena of J. Schloss

3.5

7/1/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 5.0

7/1/18 MRH Research and drafting motion for sanctions for T. Vazquezfailure to appear for court -ordered deposition

5.8

7/1/18 KIS Work with R. Holbrook friends and family to get declaration,revise declaration accordingly.

2.2

7/1/18 KIS Research and drafting motion to strike Lichtman designation 8.47/1/18 KIS Review, research and revise motion to quash J. Schloss

subpoena.1.9

7/2/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 5.7

7/2/18 MRH Research and drafting motion for sanctions for T. Vazquezfailure to appear for court -ordered deposition

4.2

7/2/18 KIS Deposition preparation with J. Brown 3.07/2/18 KIS Travel to/from SM and procure signature on R. Holbrook

statement.2.0

7/2/18 KIS Work on trial brief. 3.87/2/18 KIS Research and drafting motion to strike Lichtman designation 4.47/2/18 KIS Work on reply in support of motion to compel deposition of

M. Quinones -Perez and discuss same with E. Gordon1.7

7/3/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 5.9

7/3/18 MRH Research regarding effect of motion to quash on pendingscheduled deposition and need (or lack thereof) to specificallyseek a stay of the deposition.

2.8

7/3/18 MRH Research and drafting motion for sanctions for T. Vazquezfailure to appear for court -ordered deposition

3.6

7/3/18 AAA Gather evidence for M. Kousser and prepare exhibits. 2.1

7/3/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with D. Ely, T. Crane and M. Grimesregarding remedial map etc.; review P. Morrison report withD. Ely and prepare outline of P. Morrison deposition.

6.6

7/3/18 KIS Research and drafting motion to strike Lichtman designation 3.8

7/3/18 KIS Review writ petition challenging denial of MSJ, formulateresponse

3.1

7/3/18 KIS Deal with C. Villegas refusal to attend scheduled discoveryreferee hearing.

0.3

7/3/18 KIS Review and revise reply in support of motion to compeldeposition of M. Quinones -Perez

2.1

7/4/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 4.5

7/4/18 KIS Research and drafting motion to strike Lichtman designation 2.9

7/4/18 KIS Research and drafting delighted letter in response to writpetition challenging denial of MSJ

4.2

7/4/18 KIS Review Morrison documents and prepare for his deposition. 5.7

7/5/18 MRH Meeting with D. Ely and M. Grimes 6.4

7/5/18 MRH Review, revise motion to strike supplemental expertdesignation

2.3

7/5/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing with discoveryreferee regarding M. Quinones -Perez motion and othermatters such as Kousser deposition and Lichtman deposition /improper designation; and attend/defend deposition of J.Brown.

7.5

7/5/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with D. Ely and M. Grimes to prepareEly testimony

4.5

7/5/18 KIS Research and drafting delighted letter in opposition to writpetition

3.3

7/5/18 KIS Call with R. Rubin re: trial and witnesses 0.87/5/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for depositions. 2.97/6/18 MRH Research and drafting ex parte to shorten time on T. Vazquez

sanctions motion.6.8

7/6/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition to motion to compelresponses to Defendant's last set of thousands of discoveryrequests.

4.5

7/6/18 AAA Preparing trial exhibits 3.3

7/6/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for depositions;review Lewis documents

2.5

7/6/18 KIS Research and revise ex parte applications regarding Lichtmanand Vazquez, discuss with R. Parris

3.0

7/6/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to ex parte to excludeKousser testimony; correspondence with K. Scolnick to figureout what basis for excluding Kousser might be.

9.6

7/7/18 MRH Research and drafting section of ex parte opposition regardingKousser discriminatory intent analysis.

5.9

7/7/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 4.8

7/7/18 AAA Preparing trial exhibits 5.0

7/7/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for depositions. 4.6

7/7/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to ex parte to excludeKousser testimony.

8.4

7/8/18 MRH Research, draft and revise opposition to motion to compelresponses to Defendant's last set of thousands of discoveryrequests.

2.8

7/8/18 MRH Research and revise opposition to Kousser ex parte application 3.9

7/8/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 2.7

7/8/18 AM Preparing trial exhibits 6.2

7/8/18 KIS Investigate Defendant's experts and prepare for depositions. 3.5

7/8/18 KIS Revise and finalize delighted letter in opposition to writpetition regarding denial of MSJ

1.0

7/8/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to ex parte to excludeKousser testimony.

7.2

7/9/18 MRH Revise and finalize opposition to motion to compel responsesto Defendant's last set of thousands of discovery requests.

3.3

7/9/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 4.07/9/18 MRH Prepare M. Kousser for deposition 5.4

7/9/18 AAA Preparing trial exhibits 6.9

7/9/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to and attend hearing on various ex parteapplications regarding Lichtman, Vazquez and Kousser.

4.7

7/9/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from, attend/take deposition of P.Morrison.

10.2

7/10/18 MRH Review and revise motions in limine, discuss with K. Shenkmanadvisability of multiple motions in limine

3.5

7/10/18 MRH Review documents produced by Defendant on June 29 2.9

7/10/18 AAA Final review of exhibits, work with M. Cussimonio to preparefor trial.

4.8

7/10/18 KIS Revise and finalize motion in limine regarding exogenous andall -white elections, discuss other motions in limine with M.Hughes and potential for raising issues in other manners.

2.8

7/10/18 KIS Prepare for Lewis deposition, discuss with J. Levitt. 7.1

7/10/18 KIS Call with R. Rubin re: trial 0.67/10/18 KIS Deposition preparation with D. Ely 3.5

7/11/18 MRH Research and drafting opposition to motion to exclude Koussertestimony

8.5

7/11/18 MRH Read Defendant's reply in support of its writ petition anddiscuss with K. Shenkman.

0.8

7/11/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's reply to delighted letter regarding writpetition, discuss with M. Hughes, and research regardingpropriety of reply.

1.2

7/11/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and take deposition of JeffreyLewis, call with R. Rubin re: same thereafter

11.0

7/11/18 KIS Research and drafting opposition to motion to exclude Koussertestimony

4.0

7/12/18 M RH Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine 7.2

7/12/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing with discoveryreferee on Lichtman motion; attend/defend deposition of D.Ely

9.0

7/12/18 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine,including Kousser motion

4.1

7/12/18 KIS Deposition preparation with M. Kousser 3.0

7/12/18 KIS Short call with J. Levitt to ensure preparation for deposition. 0.3

7/12/18 KIS Evaluate 2DCA order denying Defendant's writ petition; sendto local press

0.2

7/13/18 MRH Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine 11.9

7/13/18 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine,including Kousser motion; personally file Kousser opposition

4.3

7/13/18 KIS Travel to/from and attend Levitt deposition. 6.0

7/13/18 KIS Deposition preparation with M. Kousser 2.9

7/13/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's replies in support of its sanctions motionand motion to compel further responses to its thousands ofdiscovery requests and prepare outline of argument forhearing.

4.4

7/14/18 MRH Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine 8.9

7/14/18 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine 3.57/14/18 KIS Travel to/from and attend/defend Kousser deposition. 9.77/14/18 KIS Investigate and prepare for deposition of A. Lichtman; review

documents produced by Lichtman3.3

7/14/18 KIS Evaluate discovery referee ruling and discuss strategy inresponse with M. Hughes.

0.3

7/15/18 MRH Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine 9.8

7/15/18 KIS Research and drafting oppositions to motions in limine 8.5

7/15/18 KIS Investigate and prepare for deposition of A. Lichtman; reviewdocuments produced by Lichtman

6.4

7/16/18 MRH Revise and finalize oppositions to motions in limine 3.57/16/18 KIS Revise and research oppositions to motions in limine, discuss

with J. Levitt4.3

7/16/18 KIS Review discovery referee rulings regarding KCK documentsand Lichtman designation, and coordinate with E. Gordon toget and review documents.

0.4

7/16/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend/take deposition of A.Lichtman

10.9

7/16/18 KIS Trial prep and work on witness list and exhibit list 5.57/17/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 11.4

7/17/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend discovery refereehearing on Defendant's motion to compel final discoveryrequest responses, Plaintiffs' motion for sanctions for T.Vazquez no-show, and scope of Lichtman testimony.

7.2

7/1.7/18 KIS Evaluate reply in support of Defendant's motion to excludeKousser intent testimony; discuss with M. Kousser anddeposition preparation with M. Kousser for second day ofdeposition

3.4

7/17/18 KIS Trial prep and work on witness list and exhibit list 5.0

7/18/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 5.7

7/18/18 MRH Research and drafting letter brief regarding scope of Lichtmantestimony

6.1

7/18/18 KIS Review motions in limine and other papers and prepare forfinal status conference.

4.5

7/18/18 KIS Calls with M. Kousser regarding deposition 0.6

7/19/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 12.1

7/19/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend final status conference,meeting with team thereafter.

8.3

7/19/18 KIS Trial prep 3.9

7/19/18 KIS Research and drafting letter brief regarding scope of Lichtmantestimony

5.8

7/20/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 10.6

7/20/18 KIS Research, draft, revise letter brief regarding scope of Lichtmantestimony

5.9

7/20/18 KIS Trial prep 7.7

7/20/18 KIS Review discovery referee ruling regarding M. Quiniones-Perezand coordinate with E. Gordon to secure depositionattendance.

0.2

7/21/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 10.6

7/21/18 KIS Prepare and deliver letter brief regarding scope of Lichtmantestimony

4.5

7/21/18 KIS Trial prep 9.87/22/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 8.47/22/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions and prepare witness outlines) and

revise trial brief, discuss with J. Levitt11.2

7/23/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 9.87/23/18 AAA Review 1992 council video; prepare transcript of key portions

and timestamps of suggested clips for trial7.9

7/23/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening)

12.6

7/23/18 KIS Evaluate discovery referee rulings on various issues/motionsand coordinate appropriate response.

0.9

7/24/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 7.6

7/24/18 AAA Finish preparing 1992 video guidance and meet with M.Kousser and K. Shenkman

11.9

7/24/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening, revise witness list and exhibit list), discuss with J.Levitt.

5.0

7/24/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Kousser and A. Alarcon fortrial prep

9.4

7/24/18 KIS Deal with compliance of third parties regarding discoveryreferee rulings.

0.7

7/25/18 MRH Trial preparation including beginning investigation ofDefendant's witnesses

12.3

7/25/18 AAA Research for M. Kousser and K. Shenkman regarding T.Vazquez recent stance on minority contracting, historicalpictures of Pico Neighborhood and city council members,charter advertisements and endorsements and minorityleaders in 1940s SM.

7.7

7/25/18 KIS Trial prep (prepare video presentation, read depositions,prepare witness outlines, prepare opening, revise witness listand exhibit list)

13.1

7/26/18 MRH Trial preparation including investigation of Defendant'switnesses

13.0

7/26/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening)

14.1

7/27/18 MRH Work on trial brief and trial preparation 10.5

7/27/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening)

13.8

7/28/18 MRH Revise trial brief and discuss with K. Shenkman, and other trialpreparation

11.6

7/28/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening)

12.2

7/28/18 KIS Revise and finalize trial brief, discuss with J. Levitt 3.37/28/18 AAA Review R. Cole deposition, summarize and prepare outline for

trial8.6

7/29/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and meeting with trial team atGrimes office for trial and opening rehearsal; and trial prepupon return (read depositions, prepare witness outlines,discuss with witnesses, prepare opening)

14.6

7/29/18 AAA Trial opening prep meeting; research regarding hazards in PicoNeighborhood; draft outline of opening with stats.

13.3

7/29/18 MRH Work on trial preparation; meeting with co -counsel to presentand critique opening statement.

12.5

7/30/18 MRH Trial preparation including reading depositions, investigatingDefendant's witnesses and preparing witness outlines.

10.9

7/30/18 AAA Work on hazardous use portion of opening with M. Grimes;land use and zoning research at SM library and discuss with K.Shenkman

13.6

7/30/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening)

13.3

7/31/18 MRH Review Defendant's trial brief and "glossary of terms" anddiscuss with K. Shenkman

2.0

7/31/18 MRH Trial preparation including reading depositions, investigatingDefendant's witnesses and preparing witness outlines.

9.8

7/31/18 AM Draft Kousser 1940s testimony outline; miscellaneous trialprep

16.3

7/31/18 KIS Trial prep (read depositions, prepare witness outlines, prepareopening)

11.5

7/31/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's trial brief and purported glossary;discuss response to glossary with M. Hughes and A. Alarcon.

2.4

8/1/18 KIS Trial 15.8

8/1/18 MRH Trial support from office, including review motion to exclude S.Farias, S. Hoffbauer and J. Carrillo and research and draftopposition, and deal with purportedly inadvertent productionby Defendant

12.6

8/1/18 AAA Trial 10.2

8/2/18 KIS Trial 17.4

8/2/18 MRH Trial support from office, including research and draftopposition to motion to exclude S. Farias, S. Hoffbauer and J.Carrillo, and review documents produced by LACDP, Schlossand SMMUSD in response to Defendant's trial subpoena

11.5

8/2/18 AAA Trial 13.8

8/3/18 KIS Trial 12.9

8/3/18 MRH Trial support from office, including revise and finalizeopposition to motion to exclude S. Farias, S. Hoffbauer and J.Carrillo, and research issue of purportedly inadvertentproduction and ethical obligations in response.

10.9

8/3/18 AAA Trial 11.6

8/4/18 KIS Trial prep, discuss with J. Levitt, and deal with admissibility ofHolbrook statement and emails and preparing M. Loya forcourt questioning

13.1

8/4/18 MRH Trial preparation including research and drafting opposition tomotion to exclude Holbrook statement

12.0

8/4/18 AM Trial prep and draft responses to discovery requests consistentwith discovery referee ruling

12.5

8/5/18 KIS Trial prep and deal with M. Loya email issue and preparing M.Lava for court questioning

11.7

8/5/18 KIS Review and revise responses to discovery requests specified bydiscovery referee.

1.9

8/5/18 MRH Trial preparation including research and drafting opposition tomotion to exclude Holbrook statement

12.2

8/5/18 AAA Trial prep and draft responses to discovery requests consistentwith discovery referee ruling

13.3

8/6/18 KIS Trial 18.2

8/6/18 MRH Trial support from office including research and draftingopposition to motion to exclude Holbrook statement

11.1

8/6/18 AM Trial 11.9

8/7/18 KIS Trial and prepare for continuing deposition of T. Vazquez 17.9

8/7/18 MRH Trial support from office, including research and revisingopposition to motion to exclude Holbrook statement

10.8

8/7/18 AAA Trial 14.8

8/8/18 KIS Trial and prepare for continuing deposition of T. Vazquez 17.8

8/8/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigate Defendant'switnesses and preparing witness outlines

13.5

8/8/18 AAA Trial 13.2

8/9/18 KIS Trial and deposition of T. Vazquez 19.5

8/9/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigate Defendant'switnesses and preparing witness outlines

12.4

8/9/18 AAA Trial 14.4

8/10/18 KIS Trial and work on response to "glossary" 15.7

8/10/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigate Defendant'switnesses and preparing witness outlines

12.2

8/10/18 AAA Trial 9.6

8/11/18 KIS Trial prep and research and drafting motion regarding K.McDonald report, and deal with Defendant's attempt andcorrespondence to create discovery dispute.

12.9

8/11/18 MRH Trial preparation and work on motion concerning Defendant'sfailure to disclose expert report

9.5

8/11/18 AAA Trial prep 5.6

8/12/18 KIS Trial prep and research and drafting motion regarding K.McDonald report and correspondence with K. Scolnickregarding Defendant's attempt to create discovery disputes todistract from trial

11.6

8/12/18 MRH Trial preparation and work on motion concerning Defendant'sfailure to disclose expert report

10.6

8/12/18 AAA Trial prep 6.38/13/18 KIS Trial and review/revise opposition to motion to quash

deposition subpoena.18.0

8/13/18 MRH Trial support from office, including dealing with additionalemail production

12.6

8/13/18 AM Trial 15.28/14/18 KIS Trial prep and address and coordinate opposition to motion

for sanctions including working with K. Scolnick and M. Loya tosearch for emails.

13.7

8/14/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigate Defendant's witnessesand preparing witness outlines and work on opposition tosanctions motion

9.1

8/14/18 AAA Trial prep 7.9

8/15/18 KIS Trial 16.28/15/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigate Defendant's

witnesses and preparing witness outlines12.0

8/15/18 AAA Trial 12.38/16/18 KIS Trial 18.9

8/16/18 MRH Trial support from office, including work on opposition tosanctions motion.

11.5

8/16/18 AAA Trial 14.0

8/17/18 KIS Trial 12.3

8/17/18 MRH Trial support from office, including work on reply in support ofK. McDonald motion

9.3

8/17/18 AAA Trial 11.5

8/18/18 KIS Trial prep and work on deposition designations 13.8

8/18/18 MRH Trial preparation, including reading depositions andsummaries and preparing designations and working on replyregarding K. McDonald report not disclosed by Defendant.

11.7

8/18/18 AAA Trial prep 4.6

8/19/18 KIS Trial prep and work on deposition designations and reply insupport of motion to strike answer for failure to disclosereport finding racially polarized voting.

14.6

8/19/18 MRH Trial preparation, including reading depositions andsummaries and preparing designations.

10.5

8/19/18 AAA Trial prep 2.88/20/18 KIS Trial 17.98/20/18 KIS Evaluate SMCCD's reply in support of motion to quash

subpoena0.4

8/20/18 MRH Trial support from office, including reading depositions andsummaries and preparing designations.

12.6

8/20/18 AAA Trial 15.68/21/18 KIS Trial 15.58/21/18 MRH Trial support from office, including reading depositions and

summaries and preparing designations.10.9

8/21/18 MA Trial support 4.58/22/18 KIS Trial 19.18/22/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigate Defendant's

witnesses and preparing witness outlines11.8

8/22/18 AAA Trial 13.08/23/18 KIS Trial 16.38/23/18 KIS Work on opposition to motion for sanctions and coordinate

with E. Gordon.2.0

8/23/18 MRH Trial support from office, including work on response toDefendant's purported glossary of terms

13.5

8/23/18 AAA Trial 14.88/24/18 KIS Trial 17.48/24/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigate Defendant's

witnesses and preparing witness outlines13.1

8/24/18 AAA Trial 10.28/25/18 KIS Trial prep and work on response to "glossary" 10.38/25/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigate Defendant's witnesses

and preparing witness outlines7.8

8/25/18 AAA Trial prep 2.5

8/26/18 KIS Trial preparation, including video review of deposition clipsand review papers on motion to quash subpoena of M.Quinones -Perez for hearing on same

12.2

8/26/18 MRH Trial preparation 8.4

8/26/18 AAA Trial prep 3.8

8/27/18 KIS Trial prep, including reading and watching deposition portions,discussion with J. Levitt and preparing cross exam bulletpoints,and correspondence with K. Scolnick regarding rule ofcompleteness and what deposition clips to play.

11.9

8/27/18 MRH Trial preparation 6.8

8/27/18 AAA Trial prep 4.6

8/28/18 KIS Trial 15.5

8/28/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigating Defendant's potentialwitnesses and develop cross exams.

6.5

8/28/18 AAA Trial 13.4

8/29/18 KIS Trial 17.3

8/29/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigating Defendant's potentialwitnesses and develop cross exams.

9.9

8/29/18 AAA Trial 13.1

8/30/18 KIS Trial 19.08/30/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigating Defendant's potential

witnesses and develop cross exams.7.6

8/30/18 AAA Trial 12.9

8/31/18 KIS Coordinate co -counsel preparation for trial. 2.98/31/18 MRH Trial preparation, focusing on 4 witnesses identified by

Defendant's counsel in email.10.2

8/31/18 MA Trial prep 1.09/1/18 KIS Coordinate co -counsel preparation for trial and work on

witness outline3.3

9/1/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigating Defendant's potentialwitnesses and develop cross exams.

5.9

9/1/18 AM Trial prep and preparing cross exams 6.29/2/18 KIS Coordinate co -counsel preparation for trial and prepare

witness cross exam4.6

9/2/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigating Defendant's potentialwitnesses and develop cross exams.

7.0

9/2/18 AM Trial prep and preparing cross exams 7.09/3/18 KIS Trial prep and coordinate with co -counsel regarding cross

exams9.8

9/3/18 MRH Trial preparation, including revising response to Defendant's"glossary"

7.6

9/3/18 AAA Trial prep and preparing cross exams 10.99/4/18 KIS Trial and revise and finalize response to Defendant's "glossary

of terms," deal with Lichtman scope and exhibits outside ofwhat was ready for deposition questioning

15.9

9/4/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigation ofDefendant's potential witnesses and preparing witness crossexamination outlines

8.9

9/4/18 AM Trial 14.9

9/5/18 KIS Trial 16.6

9/5/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigation ofDefendant's potential witnesses and preparing witness crossexamination outlines

9.5

9/5/18 AAA Trial 12.8

9/6/18 KIS Trial 13.3

9/6/18 MRH Trial support from office, including investigation ofDefendant's potential witnesses and preparing witness crossexamination outlines

6.8

9/6/18 AAA Trial prep and preparing cross exams 6.5

9/7/18 KIS Trial prep, including dealing with Lichtman issue 10.9

9/7/18 MRH Trial preparation including investigation of Defendant'spotential witnesses and preparing witness cross examinationoutlines

7.0

9/7/18 AAA Trial prep and preparing cross exams 6.3

9/8/18 KIS Trial prep, including dealing with Lichtman issue 11.5

9/8/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigation of Defendant'spotential witnesses and preparing witness cross examinationoutlines

5.5

9/8/18 AM Trial prep and preparing cross exams 6.0

9/9/18 KIS Trial prep, including dealing with Lichtman issue 10.6

9/9/18 MRH Trial preparation, including investigation of Defendant'spotential witnesses and preparing witness cross examinationoutlines

5.2

9/9/18 AAA Trial prep and preparing cross exams 7.3

9/10/18 KIS Trial and review papers regarding sanctions motion inpreparation for hearing

15.5

9/10/18 MRH Trial support from office 4.79/10/18 AM Trial 11.7

9/11/18 KIS Trial and research and draft response regarding Lichtman'stestimony and documents outside the scope of deposition

11.1

9/11/18 MRH Trial support from office, including research and draftingresponse regarding Lichtman testimony and documents

6.0

9/11/18 AAA Trial and discuss preparation of closing brief 9.7

9/12/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief. 8.6

9/12/18 MRH Research, draft and revise response regarding Lichtmantestimony and documents beyond his designation and what hewas prepared to discuss at deposition.

4.1

9/12/18 AAA Research for closing brief and prepare for exhibit admissionhearing.

3.0

9/13/18 KIS Review exhibits, travel to/from and attend conference toaddress admission of trial exhibits, debrief with A. Alarcon andM. Cussimonio to address trial exhibit issues.

5.6

9/13/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with M. Kousser and A. Gonzalez fortrial debrief and thoughts on closing.

4.9

9/13/18 MRH Research and organize closing brief and proposed verdictform.

4.0

9/13/18 AAA Court conference re: trial exhibits, conference with K.Shenkman thereafter and research for closing brief.

6.7

9/14/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief. 7.5

9/14/18 MRH Work on closing brief 5.8

9/14/18 AAA Research for closing brief 4.1

9/15/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief. 8.2

9/15/18 MRH Work on closing brief 7.1

9/15/18 AAA Research for closing brief 5.0

9/16/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief and verdict form, reviewtrial transcripts and exhibits

10.7

9/16/18 MRH Work on closing brief 6.4

9/16/18 AAA Review trial transcript for use in closing brief 7.1

9/17/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief and verdict form, reviewtrial transcripts and exhibits

11.2

9/17/18 MRH Work on closing brief 6.9

9/17/18 AAA Review trial transcript for use in closing brief 4.4

9/18/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief and verdict form, reviewtrial transcripts and exhibits

9.5

9/18/18 MRH Drafting closing brief and verdict form 4.9

9/18/18 AAA Review trial transcripts for inserts in closing brief 3.7

9/19/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief. 10.8

9/19/18 MRH Revise portions of closing brief 5.9

9/19/18 AAA Review trial transcripts for inserts in closing brief 14.3

9/20/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief, adding evidentiary support 11.5

9/20/18 MRH Work on closing brief 6.29/20/18 AAA Insert trial transcript and trial exhibit citations in closing brief

and revise intent section11.6

9/21/18 KIS Research and drafting closing brief, adding evidentiary support 7.49/21/18 MRH Review and revise closing brief 3.2

9/21/18 AAA Find trial transcript and exhibits for citation in closing brief andverdict form

5.5

9/22/18 KIS Revise closing brief, add evidentiary support 6.2

9/22/18 MRH Revise closing brief 1.5

9/22/18 AAA Find trial transcript and exhibits for citation in closing brief andverdict form

3.5

9/23/18 KIS Revise closing brief, add evidentiary support 5.5

9/23/18 MRH Research and revise closing brief and verdict form 4.99/23/18 AM Find trial transcript and exhibits for citation in closing brief and

verdict form4.0

9/24/18 KIS Revise closing brief, add evidentiary support 7.2

9/24/18 MRH Revise closing brief and verdict form 2.4

9/24/18 AAA Revise closing brief and verdict form with evidence supportand deal with trial exhibit admission issue.

4.7

9/25/18 KIS Revise and finalize closing brief and verdict form 3.8

9/25/18 MRH Revise and finalize closing brief 1.0

10/10/18 KIS Investigate problem with closing brief corresponding toadmitted exhibits; research ability to introduce RFA responseafter conclusion of evidence at trial.

1.7

10/11/18 KIS Deal with difference between closing brief, proposed verdictform and admitted exhibits, and draft notice of errata andcorrected closing documents accordingly

2.1

10/15/18 KIS Evaluate Defendant's closing brief and verdict form, discusswith M. Hughes and begin formulating response

3.6

10/15/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with PNA board 3.5

10/15/18 MRH Review closing statement and proposed verdict form filed byDefendant and discuss same with K. Shenkman; researchissues raised in Defendant's closing and verdict form.

4.5

10/16/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 8.5

10/16/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closingstatement.

6.7

10/17/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 9.2

10/17/18 AAA Review correspondence from T. Henry and review trial notesto determine admission of exhibits

1.8

10/17/18 KIS Review correspondence from T. Henry regarding exhibits andcoordinate with A. Alarcon and M. Cussimonio

0.7

10/17/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closingstatement.

5.5

10/18/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 7.310/18/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closing

statement.5.8

10/18/18 AAA Review trial transcripts for response to T. Henry regardingadmission of exhibits

7.4

10/19/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief, discuss with J. Levitt 8.310/19/18 KIS Deal with inquiries from press and public regarding allegations

of PAL sex abuse and discussion of same at depositions ofWinterer, Cole, et al. in advance of revelations of rampant sexabuse of Latino children in the Pico Neighborhood; draftstatement concerning same.

2.5

10/19/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closingstatement.

4.0

10/20/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 9.310/20/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closing

statement.2.6

10/21/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 8.710/21/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closing

statement.4.4

10/22/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 10.4

10/22/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closing

statement.

4.8

10/23/18 KIS Research and drafting reply closing brief 7.8

10/23/18 MRH Research and drafting response to Defendant's closing

statement.

5.9

10/23/18 AAA Work on rebuttal closing brief and find trial citations 9.1

10/24/18 KIS Research and revising reply closing brief 5.0

10/24/18 MRH Revise response to Defendant's closing statement and discusswith K. Shenkman

2.3

10/24/18 MA Work on rebuttal closing brief and find trial citations 5.8

10/25/18 KIS Revise and finalize reply closing brief 3.0

10/25/18 MRH Revise response to Defendant's closing statement. 1.2

10/25/18 AAA Review T. Henry objections to exhibit binders and coordinatewith K. Shenkman and M. Cussimonio

1.3

10/26/18 KIS Investigate, research and drafting response to objections toexhibit binders

2.0

10/26/18 AAA Review trial transcripts for exhibit admissions to deal withDefendant's objections; draft sections for response toobjections

10.5

10/27/18 KIS Investigate, research and drafting response to objections toexhibit binders

3.1

10/27/18 AAA Work on response to objection to exhibit binders anddeclaration

6.5

10/28/18 KIS Investigate, research and drafting response to objections toexhibit binders

3.6

10/28/18 AAA Revise and coordinate response to objection to trial exhibitbinders and call with E. Gordon

1.7

10/29/18 KIS Draft, revise and finalize response to objections to exhibitbinders and associated papers.

2.5

10/29/18 AAA Review transcripts for citations requested by K. Shenkman. 3.2

10/30/18 KIS Travel to/from and speak at N.E. Neighbors meeting 3.9

11/9/18 AAA Monitor LASC Electronic filing system for ruling throughout theday; Email Exchange w team.

1.0

11/10/18 KIS Deal with press and clients and community activists regardingunavailability of court decision on case and story aboutmonetary sanctions

1.8

11/13/18 KIS Evaluate court tentative decision, deal with press regardingsame, communicate with co -counsel and experts regardingruling.

3.7

11/13/18 MRH Review court decision; discuss timing of remedies briefing withK. Shenkman; research and drafting ex parte application tomodify briefing schedule as an impossibility.

5.2

11/13/18 AAA Speak with K. Shenkman re ruling and briefing schedule;review ruling; call Dept. 28 regarding briefing schedule andreceipt of ruling; conduct press search; Email team re SM PressStatement.

2.0

11/14/18 KIS Correspondence with K. Scolnick and coordinate with E.Gordon regarding briefing schedule and stipulation, avoidingneed for ex parte application.

0.6

11/14/18 KIS Research and drafting remedies brief 7.3

11/14/18 MRH Research and drafting opening remedies brief 4.5

11/15/18 KIS Correspondence with K. Scolnick regarding effect of courtdecision on 2018 election.

0.3

11/15/18 KIS Evaluate request for statement of decision, discuss with M.Hughes, and research regarding level of harassment byDefendant's request for statement of decision

3.8

11/15/18 MRH Research regarding inquisition through request for statementof decision.

4.9

11/15/18 KIS Travel to/from and meet with G. Morena and 0. de la Torre 3.0

11/15/18 KIS Travel to/from and participate in local cable news storyregarding Plaintiffs' victory.

3.3

11/15/18 KIS Begin formulating remedies brief and strategy, discuss with J.Levitt.

1.5

11/16/18 KIS Research and drafting remedies brief 7.6

11/16/18 MRH Research and drafting opening remedies brief 5.8

11/17/18 KIS Research and drafting remedies brief and associated papers 6.9

11/17/18 MRH Research for opening remedies brief 4.1

11/18/18 KIS Research and drafting remedies brief and associated papers 9.2

11/18/18 MRH Research and revise opening remedies brief 3.7

11/19/18 KIS Revise and finalize remedies brief and associated papers,discuss with J. Levitt; discuss path to stop certification of 2018election

3.8

11/19/18 KIS Explain to local press Defendant's request for statement ofdecision, and how it is not newsworthy

0.6

11/19/18 MRH Research regarding procedure for expedited injunction,discuss with K. Shenkman.

3.4

11/19/18 AAA Read and suggest revisions to remedies brief and associateddeclarations

1.3

11/20/18 KIS Research and drafting TRO / OSC application to prohibitcertification of 2018 election, discuss with R. Rubin

7.1

11/20/18 MRH Research for TRO and preliminary injunction motion regardingcertification of 2018 election.

3.6

11/21/18 KIS Research and drafting TRO / OSC application to prohibitcertification of 2018 election.

4.9

11/21/18 MRH Research for TRO and preliminary injunction motion regardingcertification of 2018 election.

3.0

11/23/18 KIS Research and drafting TRO / OSC application to prohibitcertification of 2018 election.

8.5

11/23/18 MRH Research for TRO and preliminary injunction motion regardingcertification of 2018 election.

5.1

11/24/18 KIS Research and drafting TRO / OSC application to prohibitcertification of 2018 election.

6.2

11/24/18 MRH Research and drafting section of TRO and preliminaryinjunction motion regarding certification of 2018 election.

2.9

11/25/18 KIS Research, draft and revise objection to request for statementof decision; coordinate with E. Gordon regarding same.

6.5

11/25/18 MRH Revise TRO and preliminary injunction motion. 2.5

11/26/18 KIS Research and revise objection to request for statement ofdecision

3.9

11/26/18 MRH Revise and finalize TRO and preliminary injunction motion 1.8

11/26/18 AAA Review ex parte application and declarations and suggestedits.

1.4

11/27/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on TRO / OSCapplication to prohibit certification of 2018 election

5.8

11/27/18 KIS Travel to/from and attend rally at city council meeting and citycouncil meeting, then meet with clients and local activists.

5.1

11/27/18 AAA Hearing on ex parte application of stop certification of election 4.9

11/30/18 KIS Evaluate order directing Plaintiffs to prepare proposedstatement of decision and proposed judgment, andDefendant's remedies brief, discuss with M. Hughes and R.Rubin, and begin formulating reply regarding remedies.

6.6

11/30/18 MRH Review Defendant's remedies brief, discuss with K. Shenkman,research issues raised in Defendant's brief.

5.2

12/1/18 KIS Research and drafting reply remedies brief 6.5

12/1/18 MRH Work on response to Defendant's brief and failure to actuallypropose a remedy

4.4

12/2/18 KIS Research and drafting reply remedies brief 8.1

12/2/18 MRH Work on response to Defendant's brief and failure to actuallypropose a remedy

5.3

12/3/18 KIS Research and drafting reply remedies brief 7.6

12/3/18 MRH Work on response to Defendant's brief and failure to actuallypropose a remedy

4.9

12/4/18 KIS Revise and finalize reply remedies brief, discuss with R. Rubin 6.6

12/4/18 MRH Revise response to Defendant's brief and failure to actuallypropose a remedy

2.8

12/7/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on selection ofappropriate remedies, conference with co -counsel thereafter.

5.5

12/7/18 AAA Hearing on appropriate remedies and team meeting. 4.8

12/14/18 KIS Evaluate remedies order and decision, respond to pressinquiries re: same, discuss response with A. Alarcon.

2.9

12/14/18 AAA Review court tentative decision and discuss response to courttentative decision on remedies with K. Shenkman.

0.4

12/15/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte for clarification. 2.6

12/15/18 MRH Work on ex parte application in response to remedies ruling 3.5

12/16/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte for clarification. 1.9

12/17/18 KIS Research and drafting ex parte for clarification, discuss with R.Parris.

4.0

12/17/18 MRH Revise ex parte application for clarification of remedies ruling 2.2

12/18/18 KIS Revise and finalize ex parte for clarification and draftassociated papers, incorporate revisions from colleagues;correspondence with K. Scolnick regarding same.

4.9

12/18/18 MRH Revise ex parte application for clarification. 1.6

12/18/18 AAA Review and revise ex parte application 0.8

12/19/18 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from ex parte application hearing andconfer with G. Cardona regarding rescheduling and potentialagreement on seeking clarification and draft correspondencere: same.

3.7

12/19/18 AAA Travel to/from ex parte application hearing 2.8

12/20/18 KIS Drafting proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment.

5.4

12/21/18 KIS Drafting proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment.

6.3

12/22/18 KIS Drafting proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment.

7.5

12/23/18 KIS Drafting proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment.

5.2

12/24/18 KIS Revise ex parte application and associated papers accountingfor date change and additional relief necessitated by datechange, and correspondence with opposing counsel regardingsame.

2.2

12/24/18 KIS Drafting proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment.

4.9

12/26/18 KIS Drafting proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment.

6.5

12/26/18 MRH Review and revise proposed statement of decision andproposed judgment

3.7

12/27/18 MRH Review and revise proposed statement of decision andproposed judgment

3.0

12/27/18 AAA Review and revise draft proposed judgment 0.612/29/18 AAA Review and suggest revisions to draft proposed statement of

decision1.4

12/29/18 KIS Compiling revisions and further research and draftingproposed statement of decision and proposed judgment

5.0

12/30/18 KIS Compiling revisions and further research and draftingproposed statement of decision and proposed judgment

4.5

12/31/18 KIS Revise and finalize ex parte for clarification papers. 1.8

12/31/18 KIS Compiling revisions and further research and draftingproposed statement of decision and proposed judgment

5.3

1/1/19 KIS Review remedies briefing and case law and applicable sectionsof Elections Code to prepare for hearing on ex parteapplication for clarification; review mandatory e -filing rules todetermine applicability to 1-2-19 ex parte and coordinatefiling.

4.7

1/1/19 MRH Revise proposed statement of decision. 3.6

1/2/19 KIS Prepare for, travel to/from and attend hearing on ex parte forclarification, debrief clients and then debrief M. Hughes and R.Rubin, respond to press inquiries re: same

8.2

1/2/19 KIS Draft and revise proposed statement of decision and proposedjudgment based on court's direction and suggestions ofcolleagues.

4.9

1/2/19 MRH Debrief with K. Shenkman regarding hearing on ex parteapplication for clarification and further work on proposedstatement of decision and proposed judgment in accordancewith court's instruction.

2.5

1/2/19 MA Review previous remedies briefing and ex parte application;travel to/from and attend hearing on ex parte application forclarification.

5.2

1/3/19 KIS Research, revise and finalize proposed statement of decisionand proposed judgment consistent with court's direction, anddraft notice of lodging

4.8

1/3/19 MRH Review and revise proposed statement of decision andproposed judgment.

1.9

1/7/19 KIS Prepare materials for neighborhood / civic organizationmeetings; travel to/from and speak at N.E. Neighbors meetingand Apartment Owners' group meeting.

5.9

1/8/19 KIS Travel to/from and meet with PNA board 4.01/12/19 KIS Travel to/from and speak at Neighborhood Council meeting. 4.5

1/18/19 KIS Evaluate objections to proposed statement of decision andproposed judgment, coordinate with D. Ely regarding districtboundary descriptions in judgment

4.9

1/18/19 MRH Review Defendant's objections to proposed statement ofdecision and proposed judgment.

3.5

1/21/19 KIS Evaluate objections to proposed statement of decision andproposed judgment; discuss appropriate response with M.Hughes.

2.0

1/24/19 KIS Draft responses to Defendant's objections to proposedstatement of decision and proposed judgment, and correctedproposed judgment.

4.4

1/31/19 AAA Address case reassignment with Dept. 28/9; draft declarationas directed by clerk; discuss with K. Shenkman

2.9

EXHIBIT M

>a0:4

3co.<

3

-z,.5

0Zro

0.7.

CT

°

5:co

rrt..t;5

9.11

71>

n0-,Fp'

15050.0 .

0

0-,a)4,

f71/

tr'4A

T'

wrov,ro02-1n=coa)

*0-)0°,-,.-,.

7r)ro

rov'D,-,n7<.

V-,r o

J.S'CV

S

ir, -0 a -., CD "5a) 0 IT t v = -1g - r, n = r o

ro 0 ,,ci) F' 5. R' 0 gg

a) ., ro n5' (a 5'0 -a.) 0 ,-,.

.n 5 0 rDco c n 0. 5

Vr o'

.

3.5SU

..

5'

-0

3

5pp

.<5

v, -5

-9 7, .2,:. Lc,.

eLv, 07- <

.f.-'' '-'071

-0Fo'

aa

5'

(4. Vr ) 3- .

co g0_ 0

02

Er 3

-Iopv,x-

(r,coco

nro

(1)a)

-,cl_5*

nco

ro*

<ro....

-Y, 5 -E a)o -...

<ro

<ro

co a.).<

-- o<rot f

(DroC . -I .

ro

flo0 -0

n-.

IA=

D.)

30_CLfpa)

vt570-

CM0.)

<Do

iTi

-(1)0 -' °.

0°

-0,

CD

FD-<

ac0.-2

3.c

D, a, ,.."7 -, . / DTI 0_0 0 0 Eu

et Di' '''. (D "'.0 ro ---

f° c -I 0 =

,...OW

0.3

fft

c

,-,076DJ'"'.

5

E =,-) 02' 7

0,0 0-xi

07,CDe+.

5c

5-I OttfD cscf,0 c°0)-t 0.

cowN-M5'

00.)::.

PV'13roro..

up5

,...

ofv,

*c:0=ro

n)

a-C-1.

02.7,,

cr-z0_4.,

8(Eel.

0C

3c°.,'

5-so=c_

10

.0rI3a)r -lM--s.a)0ci

I

M-o>0=C2-

T

5 . .- 0w = C 0 -I,1.0 -0 5-0 w 5 -s0 0- 4 '7' 0_,< 0 - ..ft, n 0 al-1 04 c° a) oo... ro

-h0 -5' rro 0

(I)

1-*0..1-.

m.C2CFL'

00=-6.eLa)Itt-tt-o0

0 al'''' rDal

i. riO3 0-_m I

ftrb °nm a,

1

nu

c1:1)-Cr0)0rri

m 0-3" _.cf AV)rt, ''''V,CL -0a) 0= v)

c2; *

CU

A*-

mel.a)

5nX.<

=-c,oM

eti

5O.a)=-,',0

na)3MICo

CV

-0rur0-

0cr5'0

'0

t7)3

.

0,05

0a)-,,..<cr)

(7).r -t.

.R. (.7).

CV'

` ro if C),_ CD 7 r) =.4' 3 0 B". 3.0 -0 -er5- 5- n ,!..., o.)

-0.?...)

a)a5'

0

0,-1.(L)

'Z. f,-.1.rD _.=ran rroVI 0)A D

0-hm.0CCO-

,47 E- ...)C,,v).03

..<

0-P.CAa)3C0

-ro * 0 8" 5' 3 0_

n. c 5 0_ 5F.) -' 0 (C) S

5r) 63- , 0)rt 0 3 .F1) 0

x-13rD

-a co 0°

co

ro

- ro - 0 .03 ° '-'' ....-' AI-

a) r)a)

-5 030,-.ro 0 3

R.

1-,

rL7.,.-

rDScr)HroVI

CLro3a)c0_-rD,-.

4*

ro

- ,-tD.,n

.

5aon0p)CLCD

a)m

,,,..0--,cu=

d<a)..cria)5.D,

KS"Fia)

nc:<=-..

rTng'5

CD--...0-3-v,a.)

=,-,-a)

Zo0C1t

0a)

ro0-

3CV,

ro-I,a)f7).

0-FD-m,..i.ro'

-t35'n)-.3a)n=.a<V007)-17.1.rom_

<2p0

Oil

73 4-. c- =. o--0 CV r° 0 °fD 0 fD -I)a) 0. X CU Vt).7," S- (D S' (1)5. rt, 0 rr, 0

a) ,, v, -1,-0 _,.- r-1. V' CDo 5- 0 ., a,-11: ' * ° n- * 0- .- ". = 0DJ 7' F, 0 .9- F54 = 0 twr,,,, 0-ro

g O.3 =°-. a, rD-, <-a - 3 o -a) o- n r)cs rp fl)

0-71. a; (D ts v,0 ,,, m 0.- ,(I) 0 ''''CL -. -2, 0_ g-3-v,n a)c .-,.a1:5 m (LD,-s0 =.;

B v)

1

Oaa0co

CU-

.....ro ---IN

-< oti.3

crco 0_tA (D

a 3...,,..J Cm0 -I

a,O. -aa) =.3 F;o ,DOD

-t 50., cl.10 ro5- -F 0v, a

00Sah

n.0°e)r,da-

0-co

c7--I0-,3."0Z>co

0

71

<tllN

.01aco

...r.)

01

0-)..1.7)

Cmcr

00nal?qro.."

lc

. eT e -t5 < CD =. 2.r) -0 .-,. _. =,v) 0 -ct)* -o co_ no V=1: °' * -,_, _0- ...1. p, 0- DJ- .

n*x- n (/) Fro /3. CA = 6'

C1J

0

or'

3

-n

.4.ro

>-

n-

.<

8<.

5

-< D., o- ar, rp- r-1. al IA

rp a 3n -/1) M C -1- = -0 'CI57

V

W.r)

-0VIcoo0)COn 50 (D rp -t

ao r) 0 0 0 -d_

0n,C ,-, fD -1, n-9 Z

IT 0.1n (0

CLro0 - n c c<. v,,... Q. FaFp,

3-43Cu-.ma)

I>

G"-)

0OM 0 Etr,N e4- -1-. 0) Z.

0)SN-n .-. 0-3- 03

(12 cy (0 03''' '-' 'El5 v,

oo ...4. *. !'"'

,.. - a)0- -<ro

>g0-,3ro<

xccro3-mw)

=tomSA"

a)3

41PIIQ

inin

`Vt..1

la0:n.

ti...)

1/1

iv oo

vi5'00

VD

;..1

*o..1

C)

---.11.-%

00

4.2P00

alrsa:-.1

-13CD

0Ro

N

5'<ft)vCr.

actiricrD,-,.

.71

<N-0a

CD

wa°-g1-rooZ

NN.0CMNcu7CL

-t=-1CD

-0a)

ti;

gcu

-p01

fD

-P)-Icn.4.

Am18VIA.:oo-hi71<NN.0cft)N

(^8m=al_cCu.-I*acco

*.<fD,-).ca.5MC.nocavimct,ret

C)El:VI00CIC00n.,,,...

171

Cr+n0-..,r-I-0a.

<CDin

'.ex,a)el.fD

'0-%.0-I*0'ro0O.

100v)

oawo0Qp0?"

to CD-1 - <-, m(0 .-i: Fir0 5 *13 00 co 0.= oa. 5- nCD - C=n CU

fD

-I ca ?.,.m 0 v,ao cu ,.,cu .z --ii a-. ,,,,, 0.acm ix 3

co w.Q. v) -co m 0--,2 o. 0-n. 0 ..<rt) 0 a)=rT; A. ro"co -1 3=. M 0.3 a)

. 61, 0no.

"'s .....0 -I 0a iv -,C n Ma s 0-. 00 -17 to 5.

cu Oa0 0to_ cn 303 aa)

13 -t

lo -00 -,0 CD13

9.4., N.-0 7-f') 0o mc.zm

uu-.-.. CD"7 -a0- a0 -,.-, z7 rro8 -o. "gto 0- a)- 0_Q. 00 0 -se CD

7 CD.01' tel

a -4,to. "0TI DI0- 00' a)0<3- in.o G0 0Q. -01,K. =

4:0On _.CL o, 0.,,,,,

01CD<Hi',e<pco30-1Cu

F.;

13

3cu

..,?

-s,,,,,,

c;.--,-.

to

°=CL

Zrainet

acla).-1.0-aZ>IDoCL

1,

I:,

8.1)

0tocom

giton14o

OW=

1:(3 zi-1 11)-s _to cCA CI)

17 .-po CDP,-- mCD ..,0 0en 0a) O.= =-I -tto o-a 00 cm '0v, 12M m

3ro.4.=cu

-,fD

m0VICD

Le)

co.0=.xe:a)

,-0

0-»(2c

8<fD

-Z-ICO

-0cM

.!1-tMcocoa)-1n=c,,00.0.et0)

2mto'7'a)09.o-.(1)-,

rziCD_efitcD

om"M3O.0.-ttelMmce,-000tel

toes0E-2oE.:.

cn20-1,1

g:tomo<CD

Q-I0.0cca

.11-I<00n)a)-107to0o_O.@g3MMeq,

1130tilngM.0-.

1-*.-.M-nv)

5'--:fp0

'Ci0=05)

03,3c0C"Fial,-1*.0=co*-5..

0tD-h0a.0rtv)=-

7c

9.:Poi

g..<°013-,--,i-lo-1

eDa'".c0M.0Fe-3:0nocM

8-

1:,r02man co<

m- _0 c," 'A'a C7TS fD0 a.A.- O.0 mza7 -tS

s--"Eu >3 a0. u"*07 roe" -,0 7

1.. 0-y, ....a Jo.4 3CCD

0.0 mc 0.

-0-13 >0 04 `i0 m"t -IfD a)s.)X ,0 0.<-CU -1a fbal tnr+ CD- 00= P0

0 -0-,3 am- c

g .,=.CO,,

-t a_f b< M

30- cLD -Idi rD'a -Iv, Pi.ill 041 .M.3'

ovlfD

1:2M,,,2:o

00vlc-0)tocD0.o0Zn0cin.

A.(1)zn

"..<

(b.cr,, rD

:.

0' =-9tV.._

J-. 7.:ciS/D-8 0=g. -0> is(1 A.-- <m

a)

nCI <*

"c"T

CM"c

'13v)

..,ro-0.r+7-M-..7;Mto

131.0

aco

Ma)

v.su=O.000a.,acucu0--00-m'9CU

O.<0na)Q

IztoE>zm2co

°I.Sa-0-,4n

E

(-)=-<

=0 0-end'. c=

c 1/Ia) 0r..0',-, ts= *"4" 0-r)o -o= z>

0=-I, 0_0-, >> 7.

C .

"0 V)(") -0 co- 0.g mto 71" -)el m0 CMc a)0 -%o O.IL 5.

. CFO3 v,lacg. A:'ter =o-,, n1/1 CT.=-m

C =Im CD

...,. a0 5VI 3a, in= %P''' m0 =o CLa.0 a0 toF. m1, cu-,nfD 0"1-1* ..,1:4) fDE. vo,.1. cu-io 0.R 50- CrCi8 '1g' Fre.°: a)7B o7,- cz0 allrcu ;ata)

A 20 0-,0. a)- =0 Cle

co-Z

72mNto0)

=.-P.0.7,a,0o__9_

cu=-ao

ife:*1.

cof_tt

o..

0;t.7,n0<co

*-2

3.0(DC

,,I..

C7c71.encUlIii@

inCD

Z.)

0cm

*e7sa=na)-

.7,fpe'cu=o.roa)

*.=7--tCDr+01-a),a -r5cCr

-<pelsfri0ta,a)0r+-,toa)sem0.8'.

Ea)=0.0C7Eirr)a)7,.....

o7Zco00oetsu

S.o,n033aa,ft)

=fDVI

mcuM

.....4;

c-9-

I

Et-.Cu-no=Ao=O.CLii,n,$'0

CD-I,(I)-1caIDv)

-1CU

-7"013O.esM

m*5'

oao-,an'-0m03-0cu5to.-0PI*:

Li

00)VIfD

0_0ne3M

,-).

0)7o.M

CD

<Fo-

*-p03am3o'31W-aa-7-1'

1/1aO.M0A.,..0=a.cu.-1.o-ho-,.-..7)

Crl01

3rt,

3 =ra CD

to3 mp=@ 1"40O. Fo,C 00

p)-1

=aoCin0z0-fal=eel.0-,0is

-0c0)

-03m

R....

0ncuccoM!"

0m.0=M17

m, -is

;It

ro

3o<wa)7a.-,Er-pZ'M0.-,.07O.a)-,Q.,y,

cuaca.0.3g,

vz(DthfDa)-1,-,="CD

m

0oa0ca=r, cv,-,..

5Z0)

v,M.a)a

*0.7;

0-I.-0Z>010CL>E1:ICII

=

0_

ag.,-h".33fD

30@aCLC3

xMCA

cota"S

0--t

0%

cu

=cmco

m40-0,'aM0-IIa)

Elv,cD

000(.1

cj-0CI:c7,,..i.

a.nr+CD

CD

00(n0)0CL0.al=

-3'

3CD

3Ow0a.c3

xiCDinM0)Mn70.ro3

cu-13

.-T.,

5'<mv,-,..

61cv-p.5=N0O.0---c0g0Ori

3fD3c,-,ai=0.3

0othtl,'

5.cm0)<

a70.

=e-<o-1.,

o<m

-,to3tD

,M":toen

5'n7su4(1)

_en

-.-

et0317=.o00nenco

n7ea0a_'0--,m-ato=`aOav,C33a)

..

3m30-,0)0a_C_,

aVIY,

tafel.M0rtCu

tf?)v,m

VIPN tO

GPPNCDa Nb.+a, p,

.0.

linr1-.

in!*3cn

IN:"1to

:4t10WLtiP

I -I

!*1NioqltaY1co

0000Ntor W1-b

I-1coco

W

0 0)c v)7 alv) a)fp 74

a) '=a. mo

00= 0m -ICD 0_o. 5-", 000-I O.0, cel03 0n <0 .<0, Q

Q -1ro

,3 ,F1P alal (1)

11) Mtu "00 00. 3.0. "

0 u1-. a,a 0("2-'0 n0 00 coo. aro= cun 0

4,0 o.0V -0

N at-0 0Su

3 4''al0: =

/7; a.n0 0.< {,71'M n..2 F,

70 inMT

M LT)N n0 00 <m

4 QEr Et:

m -0 1-1.0 =.i.c eD

IA

*=0coao_to7V/N

3,00e -D .0-c 0tic 00 0

tocog ru0M cl_3 aiCL == rt.M t"0. x0 .0aa a,

Aror+0CU

CL<a)30)N=CDN".

0=a0.-115=t -t-on03a..-*=.ii7-m.c-c7a

.

000

3c.°0oe*=0-Fe)0c

o.a15

8

M

Q

@M.-Zig-3allc..-cr,3

CD=ri-Mv)-000Namrc0

m..,,M-,-CLa)=

cn"....

a0MN

0.(7-.n0<0)

-ro.00PA'

as;u,-70

CD

../.o0:g)

cv,0

15=CAAI=0.no-,to-0oa...Z

id

gua <.-4.-0 al,0

. rt.a. 00In 70, Fi- 7Cta M- 0tn <r.P.. =0 a,0 _0 -.. 0.0) -0

7017Z 24m n° B"o.0_ -1,"CD -.i00

4.4.

VI 0.

=47000",

EnXMo*.P5'CIC0:s

CFO

Fiivsmm-n=ro=.rA0a0=0=0N

aIvao.0..mm=

at0 ri.

efb-3 .e.CL <CI' 71fp., <= .05 23 N

0-'

.<o0CD

0.fD'7oH'A.-..

5=,...@

7v,

nM

13-0Cu;V/

ga3a)

7.2

-.0<ro4..

pratuFp+

....CA=m-,-00_

-a(13

-02.1

ii0-Ig0..-IlX.m

<,1),

45a)N

fD

°37cn'T-3M!..D.,.

0Dm

:=-a.u+

=3-,m

a00)-,O.5

0,0,to0

tuto7Cl.nla)u)ro

etm <co co

0. "*.0_ OT11

fD !1).-0 to01 GI_..-P.5 0M <

(7.cu=CL

'071).

-0a)--t0-0..0-,-t;R40-M

-8

070_,GI

00)<F=a=0.=00-,MInM0.1-In7-fp"000a-03

clMM-.05-0=0=o--1.

5a

.5

..0)Z0.

< Ma)

* *-0) rc-a t0F ' M0, -»

m

0 o.2: CusCu0. =EA -t.n u,o< -0m C-s-Q -0.., 0m 4.o eDc 0.CDA 3''' ITcuo tum..0_

3M 0-,

-8 n0cm roeD ,in ...,

co (1)= 0Q0. 11,,)

-.1 07MVI =a, 000 -0n ET

0Fp' Z.on0 vtfl 0_-= c,""

IM Onte <0

MR '<- -cM fD3 viel TS.., 0

(nm

7-.-1. ..U1o 0al :9

toc, 71)'

v)-0 -0= 0M I'D0 =n

mCrtatnDrcoao.,0A7

<

ECII

J.M

fD0-4.a)oM=,,,..VI

3'42--Iv)c-0-0-0=.I.co-;

-,"

8u'''''0-,,0g5CD- Iaov

°r.0-,Mcn

fol)1...ICratu

to7-1

o00.<Du

Zo..03.0Cu-Ito-I,0=0

ct.m

-is

=o

'0d0-4=0.0.ro0'..Im0Za.M

-3tn74:

5'?-%la10Q.Ma)7n

"1:1.."a)00.0c

3co-1,N

S't =--= 5,r+ e.0 00 ft)

3 11h113 0fD 0.0- 30 '-t.-43 cn0en 3A.- -1.,

a E7 su

el*0-004.5_-0a)M

5.

0L.:::o7N.5.1-o.)an0)Aeto

=tuR,,-CD

IA

2"00-a

CM0)3:s

00

iZTr)0)et0=0-.,0.co.0oCA

5eo.

g.00

-t(T)

=co*7:=1-0.<P0o.CD

07

;1Is-

ro"-I,0-0Zco

co

a0)3o.

303a--,CDL.=-5'-o-)na)VIa)C-00.a)-.0,01=0.*°7

0007.0A..'rla)

Ft;0oE.0=

rrfco

clCD-0,

SD0.al0't.IA

0.2-,4(viri.0-h0.ixn0<mQ-cft).0

0CA

070_Q.-,04aFO.,z,o0VImN

mM

000fp

3CD7.-1-

r)o0-.,I.1.1

CD=nfD000--0

Im-00-Ia)el:0

ro-,fD-s,g

m,660)-070n0Sn,_303CrfD-IVI

0-1"

0_co-00VIFt:_.0

",ro-00Z.3

cro

5-R;F.)

0a"S0VI-,,0M0.M-00N74:-07!A

-,;1/4-

*0-c_

PC

p,o0K

M0.3mcna)=0_

I-ceq

,,,00

co

6-0nal

,.,.a-,3CD

CU70..0

fD .a) 5PI2- ,,0--_- .,,-,,-tu 10g' F6

,.... rD3

.."'n 0''''°0 o_M an0 0-0 n0 0FL 5- fD3 3aa3 -0

-,a 0CD Q.el ac6 a0 -cm o

I 7n0 co

tr) Aa-

ru cuNPI 0

C'101:1(7'3m=al0-Vin0<at

--7-1M

in-00ainMPIN07!"VIM.in0

-1,0,pin0<ro

(3aaco

.Iii00o_

-A: ctr' Xn coa., 0.0 i

. .-1"

5: 9,.1.' cri

o.y°m 0nv) 0.Le0Qt),

*A.0-aM-c,m=0.o)7

r,0c0IACD-00O.<0=nro0''t,(-)EClo.-ICu

n'-.7Cm

r)VI

ta0

0.m0)

0_

00

5;=cpco

ao.ciartIAM=04...,-o

fDu)rt

M3ck)

(.3.

via)0alga@.

MoC7cl.

0net07Ina)=0.33crLIZIA

S'1-bc0coCO

"Ca)7ci1.4to

D'

NJ.1.°VI

NJW1-

WPI.D.

WVI

VI

W:**1ha

IA!A)Lo

WW1-h

NJrto

I-1iv

DJ:IAA WFl

VI

Vvi

I-19/1-

VINIn

76

co00

coNJca

!)7)01

I+WIA

A

<cu

E0),-.fb

....,CD

ro30.cu

0i'fD"10"n.(13,

4-1.om:n0

13-I,m-,fDfD

0)

CL

(0vsOZM0cPTvs.-o.N0273aav.71.

C41

'nn

5:

CD'1'01

0.-t0-fD-,ro_.0

a133

4'Z

0.1D

P.=fD"O.0nC

541*

"1fD.0Cusr*0

=f'DwM

n

,?.,

,,-CL

@g'A

_,,

A

-sM.-1.4.4ro-I

SIfD

-tM

CrDA.CD

0-CS

10P72C

M

03ovs...).

a3

<c.0-IA--

*

g

0NM-1

m°IIa'

=cramnoF.5otln.

cu

fDmp

Mv)(L).o°CU0

mno0rra

.(m)a)-3.8.1-I(1)=nCD

Cu

Ca)

vsL7s.N.0fD

fD

..,.".to01.^

CU M7 <C. ca=0- I-

CUCu .-i

Caro 3-.1 _,.cr on:- 0TIN vii-sro !I:Al

0 C0 a'-1,0=a.CU

°-aiT,

XICvs(1)-o:10Us

aI-I-

3--)fD

cmIm-I

5OA

07f.7n0<(0

.1ro-0cVI-i

-...,-s(D0,

03vs(Dtrsco0D_V,

0Sa)0_C

hh7ra)3O.

Inma)-,n=

* 0-. .0''. Ty7"'0 in-I fD

...i.= 2-I -1a9 aig "-,(1) SP

11=,

A.

>300-MO.r)o3

-csrT-7e..1.

wcco.

*0R'0Zna)Usroorv)CfDInw...C.(D0-,°E.(D0-5.cp.(D

3c-M

303to--t0co0.

:.<

wr44

g00.0-fD0-v.0

tf0

0.oi

13-1fD-0a)-ta)

-,t,O.

13CU

AFi

13cu..fp

b-r/0c(IN

(D=e,rD

*or3'co-rn

0<(D

-,(r111

MfD

I

0Poo0us0fp

COo41ma3

< fl0 a)... -0 ulcm m-1 0

..,. 0 ,..:,0,4

0 trta 72- °D. FLS fDa ,-., ri....-I *'-'' Ar=0 Z.0m(D MN

n 0= 0-eu tu0 =coV' n

Ogv,fD

M00cu

B0P-.

a)0^+.r,.5-a).-sfDO.a.M3C-s-.fD-Ico

m0.-sMusfD

-'r)Sel<

m

0ti..0

10CDn=tic.,=1:-caC-7'mro.-0

1-M00 M-u., (1..ar 0:

=44. ...

,_,03 0,co US n7 0SI ta5

`e) a13-o *o ;A:4 =a) nu)0 ...O. F.0

..70 m'a n0;," <...). 00 (D= -_,- =-' (Dn CFOpp 07us ...1.RS -1w

gMco.cnco.-...00-0-.2.ron4.w00.Mco-=I;

9,3sTi

lzro30n

Fos

r+.n-0W

.,

owo.'4vs13)

3a

5-<CD

tc:aaTi.

ioaT00-0

CM833).7'05msitI'.

5Na)00-Cu

5v,

40711

--;-I.

0..07)

IIIm.(I)vioa)00.t7nri.35na,-1..

00

70M<I.:'

wM

3a)...M-t.w,,7=0O.

0c4O.fDno°o03fft036,-1=.

o.o0.

3m

ff..

00,).=fD-00.9

a.S

00ys0_

CU"

g.11I>na)ntno-.o.0

on.<

M<a)cets

.4.

n

-1(D,,,13000_co

nfDff,ma,00:7)n0<(1)

(3-9,,co

coM

0cnCD

3S.

00

CO

.0'0

M0rt0act

3o=.'"..,041co

a73.mm-s=

"0

lofD

.<o-1,O.00

0000

M (1iy on 0e+ 0.00 S.-O. <f- 74:a) =,..,.- fDM X9 -o

(D-, A.fD 0-+.-,-I 00a a)

O.o °I,..,. 5cu DDfflC DJ

v' 00--I%a,-b-c

03

...

30ft0Z-,,9,

CO.

OV

3ftS0,-4.

00,-P

(SD

13ITco,O.

tos

CU

co.

fD(Dco.

0a)

0.In-0n0>n..:n00nto-I00

Oo

g(D

rf.'..-

3-cri

0C3=-sfD

a.5.

ceo-s(D01:3-0CU

0.a)0noC0nM

ma.50

lc)-0130

30-0-*cji-1-c0.003

CD=00.-,3'ro-acr,a)

5moe(-3(A0CU-In7wgMc0.,SfDcu-t.

,..?,a'aMa)

*;4' .''

3""7tii41

,..7'fD

Ma)

CD-1

oom<(5.

_m0..1*0.00C3m0-s.vsa)00.-oel

-0co

.M,,-o-1g.7

-as

-aa0-cA..5Z

5-<CDVIC

CIO

,,,

Ca<N.0CMN00w@-C0ex-0920

(D'

co

%CL

6^

33M

Mvs(1)

80.71<tasN

.afDNa.co'00In74:0=.-1.

013vsn-1.

.9.

013"70vs(IS

Mx0A.°

fD-sM00a)

O.5

all0:,,,no<M

F̀ri-4,(D

MSI)ID

0.-0cc-0-fDZ..7...=

DV

a c)cm 0Cu -'

4

O. -,5 m

ocs n-, vs.cri *Z. .0fD 0 --Z 00 rD

_,..., co0m ta.JD [13C0 ,-,n 0,y, ..,- 1.40_ -,-s Ca) z04'. to500 .1

(D

0 CU

-° -`13 0:.... 5003 o.m .

.-h= nr40 0<a t0

cr, Z-00 aa .csus

in 0thMwa)m0.0t(71

-acf-iro111

3m3-9--0)

N'.-CAP

no-1fDo

-cs0O.M0n,P-ItDusfDa)n=

NJin

NaW

ha

VilD./

rh)!"'VI

i-k

%:F. Iii

WLe

1-POD

IVP00

'.0V

:11ID

PV

P1.0

ha0PVI

I.0!"1VI

I-1PVI

I+PCO

1..1

"4A

O'CI-a0orD

-aco

=a-1,0-s-)ro

10

O

Xmv)fDcu

t-1=(3

00

O.

00cr)wacu

07

*0-1v r0atoC

g-ert

D^a.0-;1

to

I37F.I.I

r)0<rD..."-0

Cro..,N.tn

C)7=,

11:$ O=cli c -03. .2 -0a 0 0e, o

3 (D.-P. ,0 O. 3a , o< .-o.

(D rl 0-0 CI. toFD Ej N'A * °(,) ,. n= 00 3-1, .0

"C1 CD

04 c

M0 ,.,12,3 -et- 5a00 a-% -sM 0

co rla) 00. a7 13

CO ni.7 CLm(:) lar., 04.a CZ

0 .P-.`

00-cso0fD

*--,.-1:

13roF.a:ge)a-ELL

Fr

00-

5<M1.4

Oa

r.0-o

0-

0==0-,m7a

0M0)=a

DO

*71:a-rl<0N.0cMN=-.0

0cs.0oom

30it0a0,...08B"0M

C

goOt

CDa)

na-/3/a13-o_a0.1

*x=fl,..r,0

8 on". aa0 fD- -,...- 0.... a00- @07 *n 4:a a-

a(1)*a,inn0<fD

mtuE0.1m.ro

Ft;to

-

=vt

toN

0."".4.

ECD

gi<rT).5....>a,*m.0m0>

ca.a

01c7)

3 73,0

ID toa 1)0 11/-,Cu" cla-

"a. epC On3 co

-1_o:3

cm

130'11:13...aa

*0-,X-*R=0rn.ZFaIAa)

.137z00O.M

<0t7).(D

0-0,

3tto:.s.

2)ct,

37

cm

=CU

g 5-CD <7 rov1 loc1 1"..0 cm-a o)P.I. .di

y)=§....

Zanac,3O.

*7: Ma- a0., 3.-s 7a) 00* ,a a:clo =

2° 00- =C1:3; al5 c

cm ton IDID,,, co

0A.

r)a)-v,a

.,.ccal8

ror)FP)a

5. 4a a"ro0 ,

-,., -,

0-o-0m'0 130 00

aCA.-a*

.to

(7)-)aDJ=a

47"MfD-,

co

CD

a

-Z-,-0,CD

M.

0..),o

nco..

coto

"C11

g7-0C11.)

3pa0

-,7

0.N.CU

g

13Ne3-0CU

a a0 co_ 3c-N

-a43

3(t)

r)0C.F.

33a.tn.

0ainDIa

6to-c)z>3ro

3

CD

0 -8r+. aO w- aP nisu tn.-1.,, ,-1.

M °a xi

el/ X:'1:-. 5).07 a

r+* 0co p7r g6 ;-4.0 0

nC;in.-,c--:5

0-s0-co

.z3

to_.=0

070cocoIN0to

C..+.

0=vs

a<C1fp

fD

4.3

0I

=oZ1-C

0c3Mar+

@.0C

.-4.(1/ar+a)

0.fD

3

nal-

a)t -P.

o=0-h(D

'07'F)an-atitto11)

7

03(7cu

o)

CL<0

-IM-i,0--)

roc`'00toW

7 0A craV" a)

-Io) C.

cum- ora

a 0ft, ro0

0.fb0)

a.n0

CrCONtoa-

O. -rta >a) tr1a) ro=,.. 0

,-). 0-0,0-.I-a

OA

0aa.

a0

To

"0mno)

0o_a)3,t.

t71.

g-)ta-

M

nNso0

C,al-1.-).

X-c)co4al

-).i»,-P.0a0

et0co-).

CIO

5.oo-1.

(Da. a-I. a.torn jc ..t

gn-3a47

-.-.,

o_ma0

-1

-1-

(D 0ri

5m.

/AnfD

o)'

O.a

0>

70. 7

O.7"a y)

200,.7 ,,,,

co

(D

0 o 0g g

aa

a-IFi

0a

-a

C3co

0I

-.)

03-0

ato*

nC CD § A 30

toto

5'.0

(D

to0.1

5'a

3 50 r.r+ M

<(D

0-IO.

-sN0-n>

a0

..-`

,-I.

00o)r+O-3.

ro--Ito

aa

mto

o)

a)-1(D

*

fD-) atoacr

a.57

C»ro7n

N.c)

to =n

C.

R..(Dto

a)=s0.a.-1

3 0y , DO, IDto rlCO

Ic'- 1-,(D

CD

... 4

f10-Osa

r,roc2"0

*

sj)<ro

,-)--00.fD

a)tor+01-

a<a)

o)

O.=-,oo-aC

74

=01

-l7"g

"a--.a<0Lot

MI

wCD

0-oa-0

?aM.0

1)C/1

pSD

ao_

SD

o v.,= -.. c-,11) 03a -0(,a,

(/ n0N;0a

V3 i..,(1)7 8,-.o) 1-0cr .<N. Cu

(3

aelmv,

*5

7:a-lc-s00co

-0otn;-,..

.

oaCa

cua0.-az"?'

-130

aal-

-8

..:.

o'7"

g,.0

ODour+5=

M.00o7oo

-011

4o-.,v,p.c.0

0CLro

-074:.

a)aa.

0Cu

Ct.ET,

a(-1

5-t

fp 0=h a3 0.P -00_ zCD .>0.)

el0cav,co

a)-=7)r)ro)".-.a

co

CD

a131-

a'Ma)

oana.coan.

0=0-1,

aco'00tra(D

a.7..t.CLMa**.0)-

-Z0-1,cnCua.-1)CU

P-,Ma)O.sua

*4aaa.(43

vii

fD

cl-:u-;

FE")

c 3, r)g_r Ea) c'TS3 coel/ 0.7 m0- mCII :CI. 5-c CM

E.*S z:OD 5

aa-

74:0-a.c71*no0Q-IMan

502..coa-0*a)A--roo_0C

7Oa0a30nt00F/

-0

<rtr00a0-a.0r)c3a0M.tal

,_,.

oow

.,(11,

(DM

s'''n07thro-t3DJ

*0-1zra)aO.O.-,o)a=7

CM

K0=F.co

CLtoC3Bco-1.Na)

fD'30tn

77

o)N.a0-1,,-cQ.

ODfD

0to.-1.

aand0-M

M,-I. a a

aa.

fD

cuaa

cl.-,a)g'

cn I-% cn'.'4

I-% I-% P.) to us tu 1-hP ib W P co 1-. P 1-' ,CND P :-.1 1-. P Y-) P :rb00 NI V 4.1 1-% 1.4.1 CO 01 i%.1 4.1 I1 00 41 I- 01 to r4 00 co

171<cu

,pE

at

00.9.nro

o-14

3-a)0

onroo-h9occrou'

cu

Q5*

73mcc)

2.90=--,ellDam-lona.12,-300pu7

.0cu

ro0.cu1.n

my'

A.

o -, m0 ID <g "tp P4 *.-I. -0c a ,s as :,,CL °I- V.0 in 7= 0 W-., < 00 a, .7 ',e- in

- °:* roo p

....N-- <

0 .<3 2M VIco 17.-1. 0c:, cv,= m

Z0,..,.

530- +

83

-{3m_trron000-M.M

100u,PI:0=ino

>0-0.co"vt0n03'0

0nro

*:

°.6:L.

n0<al

t71/

o

g<rpIn''''.cmcoe+fD

3'.-efp

44444

0-0.cu0_0-g.

.

0ti)3Q.30)=

a-,Di4.co0-ci.g=4.

57Al

5.4*con3DDLu

0-4.<

5<a,La.9;

Clacoetmo

n0C0-:3m°

oloi

"-.)c11)0c-)Mtn13.,

2-g- fpn01 0.9 -3 7r.t. pp- <=

x,....a) =70. Fn 200 0

o-1 : 1 0",t9 0,..,. A-m

m* 7A:

a.z- *2 =40 to..- "cr fD

cm2 cu

gm.030fp

g-PPfD="

VODI,L.0-.

A:.CDtri30Mn2

(-1; gF (10) t-1..3 dBn cuM .90 fp-h. CIn cu

33 mc-0 DIcy pri

.-

ali 0° -' 13( 7= co0.1 7c nn mtriM <.. .m 57 jr)0. ,r) 43IP 7A in

=roc.n

500--0=oZru-'(PPc-cr-%

="0O

0.-.v,

73c2,'

A70.lotv,

.7,1

2

oeP0013a.3coMr**M:

pp=

g70,N0c

aao=....

tnC13'0M-I°CDcI.+°-4tDui-o0a

.o73-n1"0)

m no-hg 0O. l'n,s, I'D

tr, n.7..t g1/1 ;'....._,, -0) 0- 3E in-I -iM 04-1' r)0 0tn 3".cu -0Ili E0, c---0to re0_ c-

con -,w, -,0- n'm'0

73mti)rocu.90=S7.,

S.0-.nEL)-ncu=O.a:cua,cn

ia-10-7z,Di-h4-r5'pp

eA.0.M-t0.0mn-Di

.

sCCD-,_,-,

0oncu.4.

GI

co

ro ,0 su <0 p- fpF.,. 0 *- 0.9 -.= (D In0 .0

170 <0

3 Mca. Q(1)c ,i,,n -1,co 0,c m0.o. c7., =n =c 04'''' -vi 00. goc--.

* CI:CL 7 0- (A -h -4 - 7 - -I 3 M 0 DJ

Di3 7 5. 5' R: 55'<03

2,,21

0 07 In 0

ro

2=

0suc;

pici,

g-. 5, VO

z.fp

-0 00 0)o. °

Di

-..

m

g03 fp

=10 0 .01

cyTi'(.1_4a)

co

7fb

r.0cam-

>3M70.

M=rl17c.<-

co r.,"'a --"" CD-, 3ID e+,

0-o_ .F.;

en 2.m <cu 0-I ..2r,= -c

(A0.)cO.71

o...00

'..:<

al17

MI0oi30.o0-1Fp'.-00E.

o-1.,cu

_c''a,

7mrT;a,a0

'ra.).-.cl0g

..<

04.,P..

"c

a. m-h 0mm 2.0co_ cu

- -o mgo CD

2 a

fD0,,ovlcuced.cu

07.@

fp 01=fp cocm F,'aclo, cu,..,<-4 to_ 0B. g

°Qv, C.a,

8 3

"0a)

Tli

0

aMo.,,*rD-F-

so

t0

Mu),0nooO.-:5n),..I.

05.,CD

-10cre,o,'4i-i

5 000 0_-0 0fi) 013 Ca, 3;,1 m

7= ,a a;M .0cO. fp= n

O",

0:(71n0a)

".

co",,4mo

3 ti)CLcu a3 ,..t.

. Mtlln a0 CmC a)= evin 00- (D.-, c,aiDv =

onmcu

=

0

0 faN3

c0 a,4 1

C inM M

0.)

O.

Mai

0mEc.,30

`<4.m,3n0

....i-l0-,fD

*.<

4, 002 yl-lm nrp c0

v7fT,-r,5.0

M= 3CL cr0_ cr#CD

o CPv, 0M.:

al.

3'crc,

-00

CD

cm

In

63)

caiRo-4O.Di

m cmcu -g. 0

Do ETin ..2 ai- Di

<m*-1..gmn

01 =a.ot -05 -,

pqIn .00 70

717(Am.0C

at0

..

gm CD0 0.0 5-a 67.M 7-0 oO. -0.

7.OA -..

ro30_w=,,.'

n0

-.117.-'man.-1.M*

..4.=

3.

flltr,et

croco'2.0=

, acO.1-,LOt.0h.)

a:t7,

gm3

O.-I= ro

cc) Infp

907"u.,7_

A.0.cu'sc3mcIn

=nm...,

z.4:=O.i.7,

8

3 =0 0-.-0. 100 zc y.vi --7nC

0

0"Ig0

,0-,c°rox

1:1

-0m (flc0 -0-14 .0-I -m m3oi fD

5'_. rT= ai

ri0.0anco-,q

0_O

s'60 ,o-=cu-<,0m

v, 0n <o 0c ..=. -eh 7- -1,

CD1:1 -IC M-4 fp

'85.m *

O. 0c 0c (hsu n< 0cu. .0117- fp9:- 2

..:

M 7C0c.,.,0

c".,ro

C-3

on0.1-IOz5

onco

Fo-0-o=(A<A.m3 713

a -l0,0.1N"'CD

0Mn000-0-M

13oo,M:5'00sucsc.

fl0=0.A.m7Q-0co<ro=-1.O.,.0.1a'0mm

r7os-1.,M-Imm

54.2aoc

coo

cln

-0-0F3ro0,

CU-cr-.co-,...c

cm

713.00su

al:5

on

*,M0a.0'

0<mQ

N.tc,

,..,71 -0is og g..Z 0a, 5.ri i s u-0 nnco -%LA 0.c 00. n-a

m

*-,= 0.1-1. -4o c

5'on.Y:

NO1

FA

Psi

ha1-1.

triPin

P-( nP00

Pw *%1

M

1-1

Nco

WPNi

!N!IPVI

N.

1-1

!Al00

PVI

03PV

r00

NIN

NPh...1

N

>0CI'rl'"'to_...0

M-4,

, ...=-cu

f -t.

'"0E.fpa7<0Ck71

<0.3.,

(D-h0ro-c=0mommmtD

an2)13.-s--=

ona.MtMSovs

5.00-I,

1-No

01N

CNN

730-0S'" 19m w

+Ims= =-o- a)5 =O.

. o.5 a,m mA t,','m. ...= 0-(D _.-3 0.

01

vs -7 XX...

= R.M (D

to8

M 3o B-1,0_ C-. 0A K0 c0< 3

=7 *r+ '''.7-M-s. CLii; _-- -In rso<

fD.2

CD

FL/CD

al=

2.7 -as

in

67

eLCD

3'41.

N3,.-1.us

:7--<

3to3o-co-;tn

...." FCI

4".... 1C/- 0=00 (00- v.-,m...., '

= el0.eD 137-a 511) Aig a..-1. (D3 <gu ...,.-« s.,

3 on(1) r1M <=O. a).0. ci=

n rnw -0,_,CU 7-...0 -0--c7 0In /-1.

7 - 1 - aoncl)

11%ro

`6'

vs30

Is,

co3

..,0)

.

MClc0sis

P

0-I7C03mxfD

fD13o

.1.1

-IIDusrD0)-In="0)

-O.

xr"

-Do

A,co,_,.0no

-127iii2<M

-I

fD-,mfp0_3

°Qv,

0)=Ct.fp0-I,oRM3m=4-I.

0-.1c==

pp03

.m

o0o=0,cu

covs

F<tD

r+M+og

CD

po

a.)=O.

":,-1fD

E0

FD

Aao

o7o-.1.

FelorT,sw=O.ea0.,AfD

o_0-isvs

'_.

Ptil0,

0)=CL0,

33a,-I,N7CLco

-8A:

3es,

Dpiainn-1.'0..)

*2,74-CU_0@-..g

m.4..°v*pi.=nAo

ctsCD

*gA*A:SXx

73Ma.

o=O.(I)<M0

-03m

=..I.

o3,5*=043=0_ncu

CCD-,2Kci)

10=a_,-i.3.a)

aroro

*A.=C.7m-t,m30.m-e.NsN.c.71

M3nrooon

CO

on,

000:(.).

0<FD

'"

-,a)

-°'CD

(7,

M-106,.,,

-13

3nc,pa

Kjoc_.00fD0JofD-sNwvo

N.cuoCD

CD

'4,

3om:530CI:.

cEto03

73_a'

(o

.8In

=o-0,

K

c=0=0)Vs

47I'D

I71;

1-4

2 am m0 PI`Z *

A:3-c,m-hm70.wo.-t.vsc,,,M

.%3aucc

r4.-0030.V;

2oto5'=lac00fl:1.71

m0<m

--2--8cu

O.a)0.Cl.

sn

clm

m301=.-t.us

00

"0fp

0Q051.

0CO

'P.-0=°-.r+-IP

D

Ko-h.5=,4.3:)

no3-0M

0)=0.30"P.0=o"13-1.-).CDa<CD

o-sa.fD-I

19aoco

B.5

00o.

CD

Vo0.r...:

o0-1,7r'03C7.

m̀'N-ac

N

GIw=SCD.

gono0u,fDoPIccn0=0.

MsfDV-I.=

OA-..2,

3a.15*m.,00.M4fD=O.300-s-*.-Inet3al0-Es;.-I.

5'

*=c_AClel'=.<.r.7)

Kfpf0.,...=cm

o:=(.,)

K37Ao10=n)

0Cr.-%2)-=ru-70.rg

toc/-ssDs.0Nann00n.

3a)i-efD..

017.,.3

cCC`i:5

00<o_-*

co00...P.Cln

oC=n.

30fD-o.=

crg

cu-*=z-0:VI

aMM

a07tn

E(D

710

L-3.fD

fD0.

10 =a ,TV (D0 C0

0) r's-=,..0 7=

.12 O.

< °00t-ss 3C C7 70 0)-I no,

0- =0cia 2rs .-1---- O--Ps

0 CD3 -h0)B °c 0-o o=34

cu' n0'0 =/0o aa al(7

aciwa.-.=

cia

3CD

a..3.).

cl:0=-,.<(IT

ppfDcu

0z-,-.,a.ro3,_a)

<ovsto3(..)

;-.

.cocn

r4

Fo-

30)=-y

xlCD

CDNIsn=7=CL

-,co

z00

3fD0.w=oCr-,i.

).

5<Mt.n'..a0)m.FD

71

5.g..,,fD-Ico70_

-gct.'0-Ic'D

00.co-00oAs:5.o0-i%

7-i

*.

fD-,M

w=O.r+asAM

m

oInA:3.0-1M

c0=CLf.nC33-1.N

O.mV0in

0=.i.@=0-...-o.-)

039to

.1:o-"fDcf1o'0,=nm-IMM-%0

cm

V071:.....

0o-1,

M.

r-87m

I'CMN

K0r+os.no3vm0

13Mel.0s-m-10

(11:Imo'.o-)...cn

=-cif-0-h0.-V.i.

<fD

..2

(-3-is.fD-1I'Dm<5'

-0

l'Dx171(D

P.

m7a.ZWn0<(D

...?

CD

V"<01aa.fDtu-1,=

00

E0et-oZcsnovM

,-«==O-0.7.000=0-1,._i

/.4-0Cro

s<min

_-ivq;

.-s..

oM-Ps00w3loa-

."4

=O.=

CDcu=.7

02 4.1

.F.

Intoto

PiuPPNLu V

no1/1

.0s

I-%

on n+

I-%

511be i

gn

I./.1

cu vi in 1-0ob

CU

IRal

Ni.'NV

A

LLI

VV

7 a'00 -1

Ty C .-1.-, 3 .CD f, 0,-0 0a) ...,. MS-I In -'t

37mmLo-n"c"ill

0a)

0:=0

c- 5CD ---11.1-,. zc _r

XO. 0.(1)

SC)M 10.0m..c 0ea rei

fb 3

E<ma-00gu.co

(-)0)=Cu

=CI.cua.

>0.0.riwvO.,7,

ina)(.4.03

g0

mBx(Ip.*1:=nom

map,., x,y+ .0

0)0 4z1 m0 ri.

a, mCD

/00 0

cr)CL 74:et. -M °

m<-Ca,.11)v,

C

ct 5a, ,-= fpte) v)n etn co

-c). a)- el.

V, 3a) .0 --t.., m

v)= r+.CD 0,1" a)-'" d.IC73

n o0 fp-3 a)-IMin *-0 _o0 3.O. O.

0-ta)

-=Cf0-l,

xifDv)fp10--1n3-

LIJ

0-0'00inm(DX

M10 .0oo --3 a,cl) 0 -i

0CL

Q.

fp.4,M3

Cu rn

* 6"/

elv et03

m <A'fD

no<CD

ina)

cmvgvi

03a) 0.-< <

0)

0 -03,1 -3,..- ar-- -13

0"<

ym-1M0 5

Z-,- <M

0 -I3M 0-003

7a_CL

-0

gX 0- 0)7' C= n 0'Fi: O.va -..cr 000. a

fD a,n -..0 co

-I

g3

caa

o-

P.....-

CLa)f -t.

v'co-0cro

0: 0n7' 0.7

'cfirau 3a) 0tn .=1.

-1.,0-3in0)0dr-laONg

0).C.

cu0-n-00

-,,8

0,-1.7'0

-2

gr)

O.

0ra

z-aa'fpX-0CD

fpx0tvc

7m, =nrD° 0,0)< 0:14

14 n)-,C 0)0)0

- asc g

0 c."h °K =1- R...,c' =

-,M

cv)

0.=

0_

.0g0

co0ci.12,v)

. 03

0- rq

- N0-M 0-18 K

CD inCO 5 ;

a 00 IA

"cs,'O.On

inm

O.

A7-sal'

-1m_.

0,:,

0-o0

(1)

0

co

g

o:0 7 -" 0- =a)5 c ca, .-p ciT

c'''. 0 '53 c ac00 L.. 10., C ,'", 0 cucu (1) 4..

0=v),-1.o

mo0)'0-sv,

,....os

in

mcr,_,

30CM

a, 5- 0m 3,1

o -4.-4 o0,_,. f-,

8. 300- V;43 41-

,0.:,,,-el0<CD

-Z

;

,045.)....5=V)

a)3fl

n1-1.c2:Mtnco

g0-3

.004inc2ro.<

4.,-gocvt"

,..,-4,

I-,,-

m 't" °o. cm 0'0 -1,o D113alM.

0 a)7 =

-0 lc-

fD

0-m a)- -.1

0-.10 ;-1 -

7,n,,,,C

*;.4,

3'.-I.CD0)

tsg

-0cij

ro-g.,ono.0

'os

X 1-0 ti)0v. .

m 0.,<cr12 N0 o`M ro3

cs-, Dac a)

.., 0-s' 000 0_Is* agX c

_,.=

M.

8aaw

t.93

my-

-735fD

a)

CD-3a),=0...I%

-3o.

,lsJ 5-3 4-0 0)

.-1.a) o.

g0-33m

-0-3

0m..<

00.070

11) 5a) 0,

203

oEA

NCI)IA a)

7- 0.a)al c a)0-=03r.

11)-sn

CDin NJ Ci.tD 0 _

1-k EL, ppcu .. crPt '0 m fD3 < .:"

tT). ,3 * 2

°Zoh..1

g

7-1

3/7

g0_0.ii,r)

0- 0(7, inn0 00 =0

.d.< -h- gM'''" '

alfp.-g-CO.-?,""'0)

(D0Cu-IM-h00.m,'00

0%3

a)nO.5

aam.-p

O.nca4',,,

.13o=u,

rt.in00:m

n5*

0C. -et.-o c

z CU> -a)

N,- 0o.CLD, a)< V)

c01,,_coa*

71...

000-1,

0ri

o 4-1, -F xg ID_. Inco =-, 0-0) .0

m .-tI IAM0 5

I 1: 1, ,4A:

N 7 nis M

c0.0o-n

:,,

,3r.i-,

op03-IO.

o3-II

gS.

MD

°:

m c cm Fo,-,5' a. =

00 co c-o 00o

71: F.' M7 .-.: -n(D 5 m

<0

-2-I,o0:(4

E

0 ,0CD Cm 5'nt 00 00. CD0 IPcr V.- m

00_

.

atelto_7

000ro

InWI.:

5=0-0

e0t

5=as

O.tc)n

ea

o7,71

'CIv,

0-0a-m0<a)

xto00......g

3ozel

ou3a.a)4-0

0.t.,

-,tn m03 .0 5

-I,7 om -3"N Z

3 30- 0-.-.

-I fponm a-,i, .50. aa

,.I.

00

*7'el'0'3

0<fD

-2-1-1,rDn(DX 3 0

9 cu" 5 -s

m -,mN

el. cu

1.it)0O.

pj<

m.

3NJ-aC

Z Ft"30.

CU.-1.,

0300 0y 0-C4

.Or=03gn

0-iC

00Z '-t.

..7 vs IAn n i-P-'.0 13 til..t g.1.

ma_ in noF,- 03-. 0

ro0<

v) eln7- 0.(D 0CL CIC C

3

it.".:inti0,p,-4,.V3

C7D

a)O.cu=O.

Do7

Pt0=ntr3

MNa.(73*n0<CD

r-0-<,,,

:"fx,CuM0.fD

CLto-oinXI:

5'

=-^03

M

g0(0 <Q-Ico

.S=3_.3fD

='-.crain-0/,+

(D

=FD-

94 0. -,5 < c

00 "6: tiM0 pp

=1: Fl0 0 cn(D -I inIA co wtn 0 n(D a, ..<In -r. 0-go c ""-s 00 etm m ea-0 x

0,0 M,Lo a;-I. I(D (D3 ;37CL -

M0, o.Cu r.-3. 0Z :coea 0

ri

-0c5'00

cEci_.MS5).

CroF.o_

tea0

3CU-I0-CD

o.-00v,xod-l

y.033O.

3rt)°)

3.v,cm

-.2-3CD-1,fD

171)'

M--c=

21o

-10VoIA

-,037CI.n(Dc.0*0.0cm3,1

M

Pf7D03O.a)00.cra

33tom.NM

.7.:M-1.--.1->03zO.

el°coc-0

(C)-%fro(D-Ic=avg

ma,.."07,5

00

CI73CD

CL=fpCu-t.7

00v(D=.-4.0I..cO.

CfQ

c 0-00 Xi: ;g 5-7--- 4 m'...p= cuM 3 -Ln 0-va Oti

*71:

eraNrn

==0zi

r -D'

-a--;riav,al=0_

no<ro

:'?Eu,,-I.nc0_

,-,cu=,n" rte,

A.mCL

ETIAemv,

CDomth000.a)=.n.va

3.0_0en

C3cm

0.-ava

o.tD00vgN.5M

S00

--,.fil;in

a)o0_

?:'

o7a57v,

000cM

InCM 8 co

A .o. as CO Cri NI00 ID NJ W 00 F42 A ....i :..1 sr) 1,4 !-1 C) 00 NJ F. 0in in io i..) 41 .a. o.) io i..) go i- to to A in I-+ 1.0 00

C1 1Z7ro m4.1. Co

-1"ET

fp-

7 C7- -Im m =1.0 v 1 ta)

= _, -

0t'D

-,co

0-o

o0

0-a

o0

0-in

0

ri'MA om o

5<

a°0xa)o)

xl-CS <

0'1'0=.000.0 -O. 6 us

F<0

0-0.0

ga-cDm-oo<m(05 a cal ..1..,r+ 3

n3

x in.6 1L1 .

I

cr-I.

-17

=c7.0

" x t--0 ...IA0,, , e

he . 73M..4., -co m o0 g 1) A

,,,,-...

'zi-rha)<f p

0..

7=0_0..0

afp

3-I3M

*e+-07et31

.0 0

@a

1

.-I

g_1-

°-c7et3CD

j().0M40.0

30'to0,In

O. ro =Z i Me'MI4 o-- ::1- °a) m CIO- =I

1,11.

P72,1

fD

1

.1c.

--Iw307..1.

m00-1,07

ry:0 7-° o0 1-, m--CI 0ZI:LX°

rt yo, ,(.3),

a) 0., p)

-2 m 00 =x c i 0- <

13; 6.7).fp

ITO °As z, 0

-hmo. x

ill)

<.,

Z.-1.-

0- a) a,

c3) S 1+r

-t 6cf) 0 q

Cal 0 n5'

-10

Pt

,^

1,-.03

0

,07xc-1

0.

00n0-

9.

=07-..0

67gN,0

-z"as

r-11:

73

0cfD

°i,-,.0n03

DJ

a mO.

g0- 0

-,0Cs74-i

00at

CMcu-.I

0.103

etvseD

> al=Cr ,.'-th

as"colomoO.

- IA 230 -I 0-0 7.sn cdi ...,

M 3-) -I

-s --ce 6ch

CU--s

0 0_ .7el 0-0 ti3

m

3cu

O.

cch

3

7

oC

F0Go.

-1

<fyN

C7NI-'0

10,

.<

IA

CU7CS

-2-hC

0n M00

-1a)<CD

0_-=0 1:1

x12m

3 09m u.-,

7'13 = '40):+. 0 Fi.,.'

00 .

2:

vii77..s.-o

OSCI.-h act 0 j

e+ ff.m 3 5.

a)

03

M

0,0=0

otes

M,-..

CMn0C

42C(DN3

-IfD

-0a)Fo'

fD-st.m3

12,

TScu-.

P.7-6

1°.10(D --h fp

et0...*0

0rD-h770-

y I

-013

-0=

c r -h07_, -s

co Q.fD

Oa eD <.... Cr ,.fl-1 C -cu. -1* -a

O.ate

vo0700_

3 ,_,.. 0

-n CD '0Ci. Le, th- ff.

r+710ID

S.

-0CDn3=

4v,0-maN.

90°-0

,0"0.7

II)

c..-1.

0

0

10

mtnV0cfs

M M7 7...t ri.

N m

3a)=o_rt.

0)0_,.

".(4C

(713

-)

0ONX

7 =0 7: 10r* Fi Du

0'fDcu

7X3-,-.-0 0 =. 7 .:5

0 S.'0

9O.0

00.CCDai0) 7

-) X0: '0 m-

m

0c. a), va

00 ;it CM0 m ,ck- h

.2. Ei 171: 0 * a),,* 5' 0V,

n R: 13

0C - CD 3 o_ .I., y, 0.

=cm0

v,.-%

c: -o ro

0(-)

nc2:

0, E2,=

5.0 IA

co

,-

a0-30 co

-0,

IA sa.7 7

71<Cu

LD-<

1x-M

eIC1->-I>

fT). 7TJ f01 3-. , -(D 0

3 rD0., Et 3 0 K 00 0)

(,.,.

? (D7

0 (A

-0Nj g O. 0' - 017cu CU

41,_,

4.,

00nfD

Yr:0R

0,"

<

. -I j -A... Ei

< 4 71..0 a1 7c ch Zer! * la:

ce .

a;

M

Do

p.

P

4cu0.1aVu.,

n'Xpc,a)

7g

M3Q.

wxm

K3-0,

13-.fp

130

7fDx

ca.cu3-I A

Er0,-..

ot,

(1) 3o D.., .-p.

7 Z-s scn

3. (1)

.ocN,0,

0"

4..

cu

0=6

fp

-0o°Ia:0=(4

o00-3CD

3

-, -% 4.-. act faj

CIO , fp

IT m 3vl 0 7i-... re.m w' 4-1.

OD

031

m*op

o. 7 °c -01°.Z. ,.... 5

elo3,-,..

30-0:

cn

FP

O.

-OMo

Tsro4(A

.....3-0a

)7) X0--c)cr 0)7 A.

0

0.

(D

3.3

0

CI7

gr-1

tr)-

3 S.% 0.0 c) ro" .. <-I. (D3

on70.

= 7. <cm 0 a) 3c

o34m 0 0

a) , o '0 0.0 ".7 -o_...-

r. 0,- 5 -m

-051-11,i. - an 7 0 0 7 0

.n r..,* 2 0 m0

eas O. -, ,... 0_ 7: = 0- 0. 3' ,... 0. .

to3c°-s

a)*5

cu 7 0130 as0_ 75 5

0-

ro

37o

o....1

K

rD

-8in

0

0a_

" fp3 x11) m0 c

00

a)etin

a)-IM"el

rh 0P c" tri

0. b.CD

ma)-sC

---.

3

OD

0.0th0.00o--1.

... OD

...."- C70- fpal -ha) 7

0_

"7aocu3

3-co

3ina)3cu

3

1-coo7<cuN

ff,03e7

%(D

7.,'no<7

-,M

el. 0-7 7o ,_" .

3 g-0 -0 3".< cu

gi-(1)

§-er

3

0x

-c:.mAin

z3,.Cr0-,O.

a)M c°5 0

cm a_'0 *o 74:n 3<

m

073.0rt.

m

II)0.

Sat0.n OD0 _,

cu-.

go

0_

M3

.0cN

0c).----

4M

_09c

4ch

o- °Ks

m VP

=7 ,i0

063fD

3crM"

A- 01m o,-,.Cr IA

fp

. .07......

-,Mv,

-0..,

0'0

< 0'eD n.Z "<

3-1,fD-I

30-O.ft)M3

O.

..1.00 0-%fp 0.

,71

,SM

an7,1..

rs

a C. 0Zn

-000O.

00

S1:

Q.

o3Cr<

020.4.1

a-1.603

c p:00.,

m in.-p in

CD

03.

CI."' a,m7 10o_ 05' x:90 5'

0

ro0_t-i00_-Inr)0<7-2-,m73M

M-a0in.1:.501-h

0,'0

0etIA,

O.ro0*3.':0'et33

0-1.1

ig3to

.0c 70ilt <e+ 7rt. m0.'0- m7< -.)r, mo "C fc.9.:-

o76.4

co

m

(7,

a)

co-s

0_7-0

0c:0.P0.CD-hm00.

07:1 fDa.)- eDcli om<0m E"07 Cu-1 e+.n -3- 3

rx.a)0 cl

. IIP-hc,. m3 =a) O..-t o)5 3

cro .-t.VI

loa

VI '2 8 1-. 0, 01 F+N 1-, 1*.) IDI-

O i' N r P W .p. P P al N P1-+

P 0.1

NIN

NP

.+1C V A 00 WI D.1 00 '.0 IN) '.0 (.4.1 '....I V 171 V 1..1 00

K n °m <

0 a 0<

CDE\]\00ro0

8 -0 an 0 0),"i' Ln :2.fp CD ocr_ 0. tig

Ps `'-',.) '0

CPrfrD

'-ro

-*Of:0--sm

0 a--- -,0 if,,CA cfn =.-t dro

LA. ,,. °Z -%, n-,-. 0-fir 0

cor c3 a)cm .-I.

inco

n clo- 0

<3'*LT.

o.)

cI, o ,E.up 8-0 -a

3ro

.0c

go 1,3,

a, nr, 2. ro c0. c. ;-,.,

tD0 3 0 Q... 02..-Li'v,`1/1 VIro m ro0. 0 0.

.-1.c 014

11")0-,a

CA.-1.

0-h

"

-* 0= ..41Dom n

00 cM 0,0. -.

0w cro

fr 8n 60 .-,." co

Cl0.v,-1.0. '-.. CO

rra 0. I -P5

eailti,'P.'na,,-4.

0s Pi''.5 to00 o

c-3 .2.0 <13 fD

0cu

CD3 rifi). RM, (71 fD5,- p...

7111.0_

M3co

5. o.cm ron

_ 50 0.-, , 0 0.3 fpa. n

0.ro

cco -c,0 0.

-0,,,-,

ri;

=....0-1'

..n, iiisw -4 °=4

0v. gym-to3 0-

--.

L

n um 0

xm-

rsi71:CL fp 0) 0. 0 m fD * Snv Q.

vl

1:3 g-

-0c

ro0i7s:

ntu m0',. i.jto0 0c i-A

-o,-%rDlo

0.A: ID0- cu-a c

-)Ino

CI) 6) s: g 6 oa-^ m

,<--I

...,fp 7.4.4`*.

fD

CUR

O. 0. 7 M rD v.--.C. -0Ea 8

cra -0ro"pp

cu

o.-,tD0

ro an =.--r.n'. 0o ,p

cCD

075

,..=..1- -i11) fp

P. V)

Fos<F6.3 0

fD CA0 0-tCl0-

CDcu-,(-)

o... 3= c

v,Cr

os Sn .00 c*0

.rp 0--cu c0. 0.0- OAt3 340 Mtn.=

ao -,m0 .07 cro m

0)7o_

°--,eu

0'0roxla

0"*..0--ICUg.50ar.m

RIB

fD fpco ,-*". eo <

00 cre.=-

0 G)incu g3 o

::.ro.."*.0)Iningate;CP.-im0.0

o -.= ms.In fDLo cm

01Ft; z

co o.-)a_- 30 co

cm 0.Sr, ro

70.CL-.10)

4'.5

oo-,mesc

1-10

2 n5 rt0DI CTto '''<0CL m=.0 r,-, 0ro'0 ca) p-".o fD00 <0)-.. -

p.0-I,0"nCr)

ci-sna)cr.0pS

6',...=Fp'

cn'00

g.....0-,fD.0C

In

jO.00-fD

o7-I°iii-I

nc_,zfp

R.,,,..

0-cX-*A:3-a,

- v,0-1,, IS.. at.a f p

-Rv, -n 0= 011

2. 8c =tori* a_

)0 C= n70- .

A. 5

a.,,0LIm*

013

srm--0,

fD C CD cf) ro x -. 0.-011)V ,-).-0 mc ou

41to Dvs fp-i -di0 rD00 0.7 w

=oaVI

i.,0"I0,1cu

3

-,V>pg.0)r*a)3CD

c

LA

-inS...O.a)"

a:3

VeD

P.v,r-m<

coo

oC naT 17'ti... A.0 5= .c -c CL

M0 a) .-4) 013 CL o, a

--I2ao

R20 03 0-iu M= aQ. 5.

0

0-0)ca.ron

5'0

alX-ocu

A'M

Oh-,

1-LI

-<0z-1a.3a)

=-< ro0 xn ao- o.)

M A0. rt.

c .-.coo

00M.0

0:IT)...

30

Ca

0...<

V%ICO

511CAI

Fhlarn

1.0

!Al

I-1$0

V1-kD.J

I-1

:.'I

I-)

01 00 4:. NI la Fa Ch V

EXHIBIT N

Office of the City AttorneyCity Hall1685 Main StreetPO Box 2200

Santa Monica, California 90407-2200

City ofSanta Monica.

April 18, 2019

VIA E-MAIL

Marci CussimonioParalegal, PARRIS Lawyers43364 10th Street WestLancaster, California 93534Phone: 661-429-3399Email: mcussimonio@parrislawyers.com

Rebecca Katsura

rebecca.katsura@smgov.net

Re: Public Records Act Request

Dear Ms. Cussimonio:

The City of Santa Monica (the "City") received your Public Records Act ("Act") request, datedApril 10, 2019. Our response to your request is below.

Request No. 1: "All warrants for payments to Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP since January 1,2016."

Response to Request No. 1: Your request does not seek any records that are non-exempt. See discussion below.

Discussion re: Request No. 1: In accordance with the Act, records that constituteattorney -client privileged communications and attorney work product are exempt fromdisclosure. (Gov. Code, § 6254, subd. (k); Evid. Code, § 1040.) The attorney -clientprivilege covers confidential communications between an attorney and his or her client.The attorney work product rule creates for attorneys the absolute privilege againstdisclosure of writings containing the attorney's impressions, conclusions, opinions, orlegal theories. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2018; Gov. Code, § 6254, subd. (k).)

The attorney -client privilege protects the confidentiality of "everything in an invoice"from an attorney, including "the amount of aggregate fees," when a "legal matter remainspending and active." Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (2016)2 Ca1.5th 282, 297 ("Los Angeles County"). As the Court of Appeals explained onremand, the Supreme Court's ruling in this case "teaches that invoices related to pendingor ongoing litigation are privileged and are not subject to PRA disclosure." County of LosAngeles Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 1264, 1274.

tel: 310 458-8336 . fax: 310 395-6727

Marci CussimonioApril 18, 2019Re: April 10 PRA RequestPage 2

Here, the litigation regarding the claims raised in Pico Neighborhood Association andMaria Loya v. City of Santa Monica, Case No. BC616804, Los Angeles County SuperiorCourt, remains pending and ongoing as the trial court's decision has been appealed by theCity. See City of Santa Monica v. Pico Neighborhood Association; Maria Loya, CaseNo. B295935, California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division 8.1

Moreover, the law firm as to which you request records, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher,remains the City's counsel in connection with the pending appeal. Accordingly, therecords you request in your Request No. 1, which relate to payments in response toinvoices from Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, remain subject to attorney -client privilege and,as a result, are exempt from production under the Act.

Request No. 2: "All council meeting minutes/agendas referencing a warrant, payment orcontract with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP."

Response to Request No. 2: Your request appears to specify the same date range for thisrequest, that is, from January 1, 2016. During this time, the City retained Gibson Dunn &Crutcher only in connection with the California Voting Rights Act case filed in April2016, Pico Neighborhood Association and Maria Loya v. City of Santa Monica, Case No.BC616804, Los Angeles County Superior Court. As discussed below, litigation in thismatter remains pending. The matter has been on the Council's closed session agenda onnumerous occasions since January 1, 2016, including: January 12, 2016; April 26, 2016;May 10, 2016; May 24, 2016; June 14, 2016; June 28, 2016; September 27, 2016;October 25, 2016; December 6, 2016; February 14, 2017; February 28, 2017; April 18,2017; June 13, 2017; July 10, 2017; October 10, 2017; October 24, 2017; November 28,2017; December 12, 2017; January 9, 2018; January 23, 2018; February 13, 2018;February 27, 2018; March 6, 2018; March 27, 2018; April 10, 2018; April 24, 2018; May8, 2018; May 22, 2018; June 12, 2018; June 26, 2018; July 24, 2018; August 14, 2018;August 28, 2018; September 11, 2018; October 9, 2018; October 23, 2018; November 13,2018; November 27, 2018; December 18, 2018; January 8, 2019; January 22, 2019;February 12, 2019; February 21, 2019; February 26, 2019; March 5, 2019; and March 26,2019. Neither the agenda nor the minutes for any of these meetings references a warrant,payment, or contract with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP. Accordingly, the City has notidentified any documents responsive to your request. For your information, the agendasand minutes for City Council meetings conducted between January 1, 2016 and thepresent are available online at: https://www.smgov.net/departments/clerk/agendas.aspx.

1 Community members and others who wish to stay apprised of events in the pending litigationcan find relevant non -privileged information and pleadings online at: https://www.santamonica.gov/Election-Litigation-PNA-V-Santa-Monica.

Marci CussimonioApril 18, 2019Re: April 10 PRA RequestPage 3

This completes the City's written response to your request dated April 10, 2019.

Sincerely,

Rebecca KatsuraPublic Records Coordinator

EXHIBIT 0

Santa MonicaLOOKOUTTraditional Reporting for A Digital Age

4111111prROQUE &

MARK Co.

REAL TTTTTT(310)828-7525

2802 Santa Monica Blvd.Santa Monica, CA 90404

rogue-mark.com

Home Special Reports Archive Links The City Commerce About Contacts Editor Send PR

LOCAL 11

WHISTLEBLOWER

SPEAKS OUTfamiliar?

City Officials Won't Reveal Cost of VotingRights Lawsuit Until Case is Closed

By Jorge Casuso

March 5, 2019 -- Santa Monica taxpayers will have to wait until the voting rightslawsuit ends to learn what the City has spent fighting the nearly three -year -old case.

Last week, City officials declined to provide The Lookout with the total fees paid toGibson Dunn & Crutcher, the law firm hired to defend the City.

In response to the Lookout's request, City officials on Thursday cited attorney clientprivileges in the ongoing litigation.

"The legal fees paid to Gibson Dunn as part of the CVRA lawsuit is privilegedinformation until the case is resolved," the City responded.

The Lookout's request was made after the City Council last month voted to appeal aSuperior Court ruling that found Santa Monica's at -large election systemdiscriminates against Latino voters ("Santa Monica Council Votes to Appeal Voting RightsRuling,"February 21, 2019).

The Council's unanimous vote fueled public speculation about the legal fees paid tothe high-powered Los Angeles firm to fight the lawsuit filed by local Latinoactivists.

At the February 21 public hearing, most of the speakers who testified urged theCity to drop what they view as a losing battle, saying taxpayer money could bebetter used.

KronovetIII RealtyWE LOVE PROPERTYMANAGEMENT HEADACHES!

D:d you know tOt/li%fliSanta Monica supporin

local Jobs?

But the total legal fees incurred by the City related to the lawsuit filed in April 2016remains unclear ("Santa Monica Facing Lawsuit Over At -Large Council Elections," April13, 2016).

In 2017, total fees to Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher were nearly $5 million, althoughthe price tag included other legal matters, finance officials said at the time (" City ofSanta Monica Enters Second Year of Fight Against Voting Rights Lawsuit," April19, 2018).

Community activists have speculated in public meetings and on social media thatthe City's legal bill has reached $20 million.

Gibson Dunn Legal Fees

Founded in Los Angeles in 1890, the firm has more than 1,300 attorneys in 20offices worldwide and has argued more than 100 cases before the U.S. SupremeCourt, according to the firm's site.

Its clients have included Apple, Inc., Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, Chevronand CNN reporter Jim Acosta in the station's press pass case against the WhiteHouse.

Gibson Dunn is routinely ranked among the U.S. law firms with the highest billingrates, according to the National Law Journal (NLJ).

In 2015, the last readily available data the Lookout found, the firm's partnerTheodore Olson "had the highest rate the NLJ could find in public records" at$1,800 an hour.

The three runners up had an hourly rate of $1,250 ("Billing Rates Rise. Discounts

Abound,"January 5, 2015).

Gibson Dunn's rates have made headlines.

Four years ago, Albany County asked a federal judge to throw out the $7 millionlegal bill Gibson Dunn and the firm DerOhannesian & DerOhannesian submitted ina voting rights lawsuit, according to a report in Albany's Times Union.

"In one instance cited by the county, five Gibson Dunn lawyers billed $38,255 for63.55 hours of work in connection with the deposition of County LegislatureMajority Leader Frank Commission, which lasted less than two hours," the articlesaid.

The bill filed with the court was 900 pages long, according to the Times Union("Albany County disputes $7111 bill," July 8, 2015).

In a 2012 case filed against Chevron by a group of Ecuadoran villagers, the oilcompany said the legal fees included 36,837 hours billed by its lawyers at Gibson,Dunn & Crutcher, according to a 2014 report in Reuters.

"Randy Mastro, the lead lawyer for Chevron, most recently billed at a rate of$1,140 an hour," the 2014 article said. ("Chevron seeks $32 million in legal fees inEcuador case." March 19, 2014).

Court Rules on Disclosure of Legal Fees

The City has legal precedent in refusing the Lookout's request, legal experts said.

"The courts have ruled on the issue," said Fredric Woocher, an LA attorney whospecializes in campaign finance law.

"The amount of fees a City has paid could give information about its legalstrategies," he said.

Woocher cited a ruling in a case filed by the ACLU after the LA County Board ofSupervisors refused to produce invoices for law firms defending the County inpolice brutality cases.

In the October 11, 2017 ruling, the Second District held that a government entity isnot required to disclose any invoices in pending litigation under the Public RecordsAct (PRA).

The County argued the the PRA made exceptions based on attorney -client privilegeand work product. The Second District, on remand from the California SupremeCourt, agreed.

Maria Loya, the lead plaintiff in Santa Monica's voting rights lawsuit, criticized theCity's refusal to provide the information.

"It's very suspicious to me they don't want to share that amount," Loya said. "Thatmeans to me it's a very large amount."

Santa Monica taxpayers, she said, should be told what the City is spending as theCouncil prepares to approve a new fiscal budget in June.

"How can we have a budget discussion when we don't know what they're spendingon the lawsuit," she said.

"It's upsetting because at the same time they're spending millions, they're tellingpeople there's no money to fix the streets or hire another park ranger.

"So much for the transparency and the accountability that the City Council talksabout," she said.

...itiaLOOKOUT copyrightCopyright 1999-2019 surfsantamonica.com. All Rights Reserved. EMAIL Disclosures

EXHIBIT P

Meal Expenses

Pico Neighborhood Assn. v. Santa Monica

Date Statement Description Debit

9/9/2015 mao's Kitchen - Venice, CA $ (33.89)

10/16/2015 Inn of the Seventh Ray - Topanga, CA $ (48.97)$ (22.57)$ (83.08)

10/30/2015 Veggie Grill - Santa Monica, CA11/3/2015 Houston's - Santa Monica, CA11/4/2015 Spruzzo's - Malibu, CA $ (81.98)

114/2016 Mao's Kitchen - Venice, CA $ (58.05)

8/9/2016 Simply Wholesome - Los Angeles, CA $ (12.21)$ (29.05)10/10/2016 Panera - Lancaster, CA

10/27/2016 Duck Dive - Malibu, CA $ (83.40)

11/30/2016 DEBIT CARD #4202 11/29 OLIVE GARDEN #00 MANHATTAN BCHCA $ (35.00)$ (34.70)12/23/2016 DEBIT CARD #4202 12/22 CORAL BEACH CANT MALIBU CA

01/19/2017DEBIT CARD #4202 01/18 LARES RESTAURANT SANTA MONICACA $ (82.90)

02/01/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 01/31 SATDHA SANTA MONICA CA $ (57.17)$ (112.43)$ (121.80)

03/14/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 03/13 THE PENINSULA BE BEVERLY HILLSCA03/24/2017 DEBIT CARD #0561 03/23 SPRUZZO RESTAURA MALIBU CA

04/06/2017 DEBIT CARD #0561 04/06 THE SUNSET RESTA MALIBU CA $ (24.07)

05/18/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 05/16 OLLO MALIBU CA $ (24.00)

06/08/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 06/07 COLONIAL KITCHEN SAN MARINO CA $ (50.00)

07/21/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 07/20 NEPTUNES NET SEA MALIBU CA $ (19.70)

07/25/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 07/24 SALATHAI THAI CU SAN GABRIEL CA $ (66.37)07/28/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 07/27 ANDERSON MOULDIN CULVER CITY CA $ (51.92)

08/14/2017DEBIT CARD #4202 08/11 CAMPOS FAMOUS BU SANTA MONICACA $ (23.60)

08/18/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/18 RIM TALAY THAI C OCEANSIDE CA $ (103.52)08/25/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/24 CHOLADA THAI BEA MALIBU CA $ (61.02)09/30/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 09/29 GOLDEN LOTUS VEG OAKLAND CA $ (53.68)10/27/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 10/26 FROMIN'S RESTAUR SANTA MONICA CA $ (45.91)10/30/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 10/27 HILLSTONE (310) LOS ANGELES CA $ (104.20)12/02/2017 DEBIT CARD #4202 12/01 COMMERCE CASINO COMMERCE CA $ (20.00)

$ (32.38)01/02/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 12/31 MAOS KITCHEN VENICE CA01/06/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 01/05 STARBUCKS STORE YORBA LINDA CA $ (8.50)02/03/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 02/02 PRESSED JUICERY EL SEGUNDO CA $ (18.05)02/09/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 02/08 VEGGIE GRILL PES EL SEGUNDO CA $ (2.74)02/09/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 02/08 SAMOSA HOUSE 310-4967389 CA $ (12.53)02/13/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 02/13 COFFEE BEAN STOR MALIBU CA $ (7.43)02/16/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 02/16 KUNG PAO CHINA B SHERMAN OAKS CA $ (56.14)02/27/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 02/26 RUBIO'S #215 LANCASTER CA $ (17.17)03/12/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 03/09 DUCK DIVE GASTRO MALIBU CA $ (15.64)03/31/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 03/30 RUBIO'S #215 LANCASTER CA $ (16.17)04/06/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 04/05 BA COLBURN 58 LOS ANGELES CA $ (18.94)04/30/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 04/27 KUNG PAO CHINA B SHERMAN OAKS CA $ (42.00)05/09/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 05/08 MAOS KITCHEN VENICE CA $ (31.28)05/10/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 05/09 BA COLBURN 51 LOS ANGELES CA $ (12.24)

05/12/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 05/12 OCHO MEXICAN GRI LOS ANGELES CA $ (43.10)06/07/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 06/07 MAOS KITCHEN VENICE CA $ (24.00)06/14/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 06/14 LOCAL LOS ANGELES CA $ (36.00)06/30/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 06/29 PANERA BREAD #20 LANCASTER CA $ (23.49)07/05/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 07/03 STUFF I EAT INC INGLEWOOD CA $ (53.29)

$ (32.00)07/13/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 07/13 OCHO MEXICAN GRI LOS ANGELES CA08/02/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/02 SQ *PANORAMA CAF LOS ANGELES CA $ (19.33)08/10/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/09 AU LAC PLANT BAS LOS ANGELES CA $ (61.47)08/10/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/09 GRAND CAFE LOS ANGELES CA $ (106.79)08/18/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/17 AU LAC PLANT BAS LOS ANGELES CA $ (71.32)08/18/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/16 AU LAC PLANT BAS LOS ANGELES CA $ (88.46)

$ (218.61)08/27/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 08/24 KENDALLS BRASSER LOS ANGELES CA10/11/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 10/11 CORAL BEACH CANT MALIBU CA $ (34.57)10/15/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 10/14 MAOS KITCHEN VENICE CA $ (32.88)11/28/2018 DEBIT CARD #4202 11/27 CASA MARTIN SANTA MONICA CA $ (173.19)01/08/2019 DEBIT CARD #4202 01/07 MAOS KITCHEN VENICE CA $ (18.88)

Total -2873.78

PNA v. Santa Monica

Mileage and Parking -

Date and Attorney Parking Mileage

6/30/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

7/7/15 - Hughes 61.17

7/10/15 - Hughes 67.24

7/13/15 - Hughes 61.17

7/14/15 - Hughes 61.17

7/27/15 - Hughes 67.24

7/29/15 - Hughes 61.17

8/3/15 - Hughes 61.17

8/5/15 - Hughes 61.17

8/13/15 - Hughes 67.24

9/4/15 -SHENKMAN 25.71

9/9/15 - SHENKMAN 28.59

9/14/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

9/29/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

10/15/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

10/16/15 -SHENKMAN

21.66

10/30/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

11/3/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

11/17/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

12/15/15 -SHENKMAN

25.71

1/4/16 - SHENKMAN 25.591/12/16 -SHENKMAN

10.00 25.71

1/13/16 - Hughes 61.171/15/16 - Hughes 67.241/19/16 - Hughes 61.171/26/16 - Hughes 67.241/28/16 - Hughes 61.171/29/16 - Hughes 61.172/5/16 - Hughes 61.17

2/8/16 - Hughes 67.242/18/16 - Hughes 61.172/23/16 - Hughes 67.24

2/24/16 - Hughes 61.17

2/25/16 - Hughes 61.173/7/16 - Hughes 67.245/11/16 - Shenkman 14.285/12/16-SHENKMAN

25.71

6/3/16 - SHENKMAN 25.71

7/1/16 -SHENKMAN 25.71

8/9/16 -SHENKMAN 32.618/10/16-SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

8/11/16-SHENKMAN

25.71

9/2/1.6 - SHENKMAN 25.719/20/16 -SHENKMAN

104.36

10/6/16 -SHENKMAN

104.36

10/10/16-SHENKMAN

104.36

10/20/16-SHENKMAN

25.71

11/1/16 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

11/2/16 -SHENKMAN

32.61

11/15/16 -SHENKMAN

25.71

11/29/16 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

11/30/16 -SHENKMAN

43.79

12/13/16-SHENKMAN

1.00 25.71

12/14/16-SHENKMAN

1.00 25.71

12/16/16-SHENKMAN

104.36

12/19/16-SHENKMAN

25.71

1/10/17 - Hughes 25.711/11/17 - Hughes 25.711/12/17 - Hughes 25.711/13/17-SHENKMAN

25.71

1/19/17 -SHENKMAN

25.71

2/1/17 -SHENKMAN 25.71

2/3/17-SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

2/24/17 - SHENKMAN 25.71

3/6/17 - SHENKMAN 25.71

3/13/17 - SHENKMAN 25.71

3/14/17 -

SHENKMAN34.03

4/13/17 - SHENKMAN 38.08

5/24/17 -Shenkman 32.00 46.17

5/30/17 -

SHENKMAN32.61

6/2/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

6/5/17 - SHENKMAN 25.71

6/6/17 - SHENKMAN 25.71

6/7/17-SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

6/8/17 -SHENKMAN 67.24

6/8/17 - ALARCON 67.24

6/12/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

6/21/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

7/6/17 - SHENKMAN 25.71

7/25/17 - SHENKMAN 67.24

7/25/17 - ALARCON 67.24

7/28/17-

SHENKMAN32.61

8/11/17 -

SHENKMAN104.36

8/14/17 -

SHENKMAN25.71

8/18/17 -

SHENKMAN138.04

8/24/17 - SHENKMAN 16.07

8/25/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

9/18/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

9/25/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

9/30/17 -

SHENKMAN461.72

10/9/17 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

10/16/17 - Hughes 61.17

10/27/17-

SHENKMAN25.71

10/30/17-

SHENKMAN25.71

11/15/17 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

11/16/17 -

SHENKMAN25.71

12/2/17 - SHENKMAN 48.91

12/11/17 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

12/15/17 - Alarcon 14.00 21.42

12/28/17 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

12/29/17 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

1/2/18 -SHENKMAN 28.59

1/6/18 - SHENKMAN 79.37

1/22/18 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

1/26/18 - SHENKMAN 25.71

2/2/18 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

2/3/18 -SHENKMAN 41.53

2/6/18 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

2/9/18 -SHENKMAN 41.53

2/13/18-SHENKMAN

9.52

2/16/18 - SHENKMAN 18.45 34.632/16/18 - Alarcon 18.45 4.882/23/18-SHENKMAN

1.50 25.71

2/26/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

3/6/18 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.083/15/18 - SHENKMAN 18.45 34.63

3/30/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

4/4/18 - Hughes 61.17

4/4/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

4/5/18- Hughes 67.244/5/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

4/6/18 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

4/11/18 - SHENKMAN 18.00 38.084/12/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.424/16/18 -Shenkman 61.174/16/18 -Alarcon 27.37

4/19/18 - Hughes 61.174/20/18 - Hughes 67.244/20/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

4/23/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

4/30/18 - SHENKMAN 35.83

4/30/18 -ALARCON 4.885/8/18 - Hughes 61.17

5/9/18-SHENKMAN 18.00 38.085/10/18-SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

5/11/18-SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

5/12/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

5/15/18-SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

5/17/18 - Hughes 61.17

5/18/18 - Alarcon 14.00 21.42

5/21/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

5/22/18 - Hughes 61.17

5/22/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

5/23/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

5/24/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

5/30/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

5/31/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

6/6/18-SHENKMAN 18.00 38.08

6/7/18 -SHENKMAN 28.59

6/11/18 -SHENKMAN

25.71

6/14/18-SHENKMAN

18.00 64.38

6/14/18 -ALARCON 18 22.85

6/18/18 -Shenkman 18.00 38.08

6/19/18-SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

6/19/18 -SHENKMAN

25.71

6/19/18 -ALARCON 18 22.85

6/25/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

6/28/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

6/29/18-SHENKMAN

104.36

7/2/18 -SHENKMAN 25.71

7/3/18 -SHENKMAN 32.617/5/18-SHENKMAN 18.00 44.037/9/18 - shenkman 18.00 114.247/9/18 - ALARCON 18 22.857/11/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

7/12/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

7/13/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

7/14/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

7/16/18 -SHENKMAN

104.36

7/17/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

7/19/18 -SHENKMAN

18.00 38.08

7/19/18 -ALARCON 18 22.85

7/21/18 - Shenknnan 81.16

7/22/18 -SHENKMAN

32.61

7/22/18 - ALARCON 24.28

7/23/18 - Hughes 61.17

7/24/18 - Hughes 61.17

7/25/18 - Hughes 61.17

7/25/18 -Alarcon 14.00 21.42

7/27/18 - Hughes 61.17

7/28/18 -SHENKMAN

32.61

7/28/18 - ALARCON 24.28

7/30/18 - Hughes 61.17

8/1/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.08

8/1/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/2/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.08

8/2/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/3/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.08

8/3/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/6/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.088/6/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/7/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.088/7/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/8/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.088/8/18 - ALARCON 18 22.858/9/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.08

8/9/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/10/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/10/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/13/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/13/18 - ALARCON 18 22.858/15/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/15/18-ALARCON 18 22.85

8/16/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/16/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/17/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/17/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/20/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/20/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/21/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/21/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/22/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/22/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/23/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/23/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/24/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/24/18-ALARCON 18 22.858/28/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/28/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

8/29/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/29/18-ALARCON 18 22.858/30/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

8/30/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

9/4/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.089/4/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

9/5/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.089/5/18 - ALARCON 18 22.85

9/6/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.089/6/18 - ALARCON 18 22.859/10/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

9/10/18 - ALARCON 18 22.859/11/18 -SHENKMAN 18 38.089/11/18 - ALARCON 18 22.859/13/18 - SHENKMAN 18 38.089/13/18 - ALARCON 18 22.859/25/18 -SHENKMAN

18 38.08

10/15/18 -SHENKMAN

28.59

10/30/18 -SHENKMAN

25.71

11/27/18 -SHENKMAN

25.71

11/27/18 -SHENKMAN

20 38.08

11/27/18 - ALARCON 20 22.8512/3/18 -SHENKMAN

25.71

12/7/18 - SHENKMAN 20 38.0812/7/18 -ALARCON 20 22.85

12/19/18 -SHENKMAN

20 38.08

12/19/18 - ALARCON 20 38.081/2/19 - ALARCON 20 38.08

1/2/19 - SHENKMAN 20 38.081/3/19 - SHENKMAN 20 38.081/7/19 -SHENKMAN 25.711/8/19 - SHENKMAN 25.71

1/12/19 -SHENKMAN

25.71

2/1/19-SHENKMAN 25.71

2/21/19 -SHENKMAN

25.71

3/4/19 - SHENKMAN 20 38.083/4/18 - ALARCON 20 22.85

Total $12,915.40

Court and Messenger Fees

Date Type Amount4/12/16 Complaint filing fee 4354/12/16 Messenger 704/13/16 Messenger 507/21/16 Messenger 70

1/10/17 Messenger 70

2/23/17 Messenger 705/9/17 Messenger 70

3/29/18 Messenger 70

5/2/18 Messenger 705/11/18 Motion fee 60

5/31/18 Messenger 70

6/8/18 Messenger 707/9/18 Motion fees 1207/12/18 Messenger 70

7/24/18 Messenger 709/25/18 Messenger 70

10/25/18 Messenger 70

11/14/18 Messenger 70

11/19/18 Messenger 70

11/27/18 Motion fee 60

12/4/18 Messenger 70

1/2/19 Motion fee and e -filing fee 73.40

1/25/19 Messenger 70

Total $1988.40

Postage, Copying and Printing -

Date Type Amount

Mar. 16 Postage, copying and printing 61.62

Apr. 16 Postage, copying and printing 66.55

May 16 Postage, copying and printing 29.58

Jun. 16 Postage, copying and printing 39.43

Jul. 16 Postage, copying and printing 46.83

Aug. 16 Postage, copying and printing 34.50

Sep. 16 Postage, copying and printing 54.22

Oct. 16 Postage, copying and printing 78.38

Nov. 16 Postage, copying and printing 48.31

Dec. 16 Postage, copying and printing 71.97

Jan. 17 Postage, copying and printing 47.32Feb. 17 Postage, copying and printing 20.70

Mar. 17 Postage, copying and printing 35.49

Apr. 17 Postage, copying and printing 33.52

May 17 Postage, copying and printing 52.74

Jun. 17 Postage, copying and printing 48.80

Jul. 17 Postage, copying and printing 57.18

Aug. 17 Postage, copying and printing 70.98Sep. 17 Postage, copying and printing 108.94Oct. 17 Postage, copying and printing 51.26Nov. 17 Postage, copying and printing 49.79

Dec. 17 Postage, copying and printing 65.07Jan. 18 Postage, copying and printing 93.16Feb. 18 Postage, copying and printing 81.33Mar. 18 Postage, copying and printing 100.56

Apr. 18 Postage, copying and printing 146.89

May 18 Postage, copying and printing 180.90

Jun. 18 Postage, copying and printing 245.48

Jul. 18 Postage, copying and printing 261.25Aug. 18 Postage, copying and printing 170.55

Sep. 18 Postage, copying and printing 141.47

Oct. 18 Postage, copying and printing 98.09

Nov. 18 Postage, copying and printing 60.63

Dec. 18 Postage, copying and printing 54.22Jan. 19 Postage, copying and printing 35.49

Total $2843.20

EXHIBIT Q

SEXTANTSTRATEGIES & RESEARCH

INVOICE

Law Offices of Kevin Shenkman

28905 Wight Rd.

Malibu, CA 90265

JOB SSR1066

LIVE TELEPHONE VOTER SURVEY

400 Registered Voters - City of Santa Monica, CA

PDI sample

Field 4/11-16, 2018

TOTAL SURVEY COST $17,250.00

TOTAL DUE UPON RECEIPT $17,250.00

Please Remit Payment to

Sextant Strategies & Research

3020 Lansbury Avenue

Claremont, CA 91711

Questions? - contact Jonathan Brown (909) 973-5567 or jb@sextant-research.com

SEXTANTSTRATEGIES & RESEARCH

INVOICE

August 8, 2018

Jonathan Brown - expert testimony in Pico Neighborhood Association and Maria Loya v. City

of Santa Monica

July 2, 2018

Preparation for deposition 5.0 hours $ 2500.00July 3, 2018

Preparation for deposition 3.5 hours $ 1750.00

July 5, 2018

Preparation prior to deposition 1.5 hours $ 750.00

TOTAL $5,000.00

Please Remit Payment to

Sextant Strategies & Research

3020 Lansbury Avenue

Claremont, CA 91711

Questions? - contact Jonathan Brown (909) 973-5567 or jb@sextant-research.com

SEXTANTSTRATEGIES & RESEARCH

INVOICE

September 13, 2018

Jonathan Brown - expert testimony in Pico Neighborhood Association and Maria Loya v. City

of Santa Monica

August 2, 2018

Review deposition transcript 1.5 hours $ 750.00August 3, 2018Preparation for testimony 1.5 hours $ 750.00August 3, 2018

Present all day (not called) 5.5 hours $2,750.00

August 6, 2018

Present until 3:30 (testified) 6.5 hours $3,750.00

TOTAL $8,000.00

Please Remit Payment to

Sextant Strategies & Research

3020 Lansbury Avenue

Claremont, CA 91711

Questions? - contact Jonathan Brown (909) 973-5567 or jb@sextant-research.com

E

alto

O

-

C

0EQ

al

EI-

0.14.0

CO

CO

ulO

TuVIcz0

&i. i7n- u6 o ,..._.

3/7 735 70 o

're,'O C,..)C

.

m m u..7,) .

T., o o zo,..),-.1 4_, uc----, 4.,

o h. M 3 '5- ig.

c "c -n'u 6.-- c ; N-i\c 0 9 c.-7- _ .-i 0..R 3 o -,,T1d c ..c c ,,, 0= -. N c 01 to-t 0 (-I 'L7

07 1/2Lo .7) 15 <T3 ''''(7) 7.1 lc) 4 CO

4 toc Fri c a, OLcO - c v)

C O. '-'.. E15 3 t'A 1: i .." Z 17 ft --;: is C r-- Fe o c a) c -^ 4-5 `5 6 c4 ci cico '''' 6.. Ti.) - -- 0 -c) o .ca oV _ (-) I._d c 3 clc --:: MO (/) vl (t1 Losr c CO OA OD OD ....,. CO --..... (1)---- 0 a)c 3 7-1 3 iii -- =7) ..? c

o o Lci..,7)ccc cc c , co,= = = = -Lc -- u To cu To c d, 2o 3 ..7, .... _c 4- 4- 4- 4- .-3O g a ;_,-- 74.- .----i- CO N 10 (-I

U '0 I- " I-. -,s_I- 0 " CO

0.) (1./ ad IV - --- --- 0. 0 Ln ---:6- awo e c r-1 ... (--I 5- v) r -I -......d d d g 6 d d d L., 4-. .1, ..... .1-.,.... LO '6 Frig-iz,,_ v, ,_ o o o o -1:3 o ci .2 6 6 --,- ca' 6 ''', - - - a) ro - a) '''''. a) c) - _ rc3 c_ 0 - -: - . c7.) - a7) Tv ci d tn a.) ....ft TD 7) 7) .--.. " O.) eeeee.- Tv u cl) 0 u -0 " § a ) 7.- ,o co :$' *O. VI 0 ,O *---- '---' 3 0 '.0 (o(O(oL-1'00/300000N o'ICLorCC '4.2'(D i 0 C C C .c c C 6 C C C N 0 a . ) 0, 0, 0, 0 0 0, d c cu c ID 7 To c ,- - - c c c u -'-^ c - c co co co n: co co -- c -0 c 70 u E7. ,R ,,, ,o., u., 0 0 0 ,- .- 0 0 0 0 0 ' ...... 0 o .5 o vz 5 .6.. 0CO 0 0 0 go U U U CO CO U 04 U U U 0 0 'El/0 ID co co co co (3 0 U (1, U ((v) 0) 4-, _ u ,.._

(1.1 (1) ..--..C C C C C"--,,,,, v., v.,0 --....C-------..."---.0 C C U U I -J u U U C`,.,... " Cy_ 0."--...---.0. " - - (1.) 0.1 3 = 3 3 3 = = = c) c, c) cu a) ti) 3 0 3 = x 3 3 c4= cc it t c. 4= ,... ,. S.. C...a 4= ,40 4.= 4= .0 -013 .01012/ 4=C 4= (1) C 04- 4.- 4- .- `- C 4- 4-0 .0 0 .0 "5 p 9 2 45 t) 98 4- 46 46 15 46 15 "5 .o o 2 -E, .0 4.5. .0 .0 .4;'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -C

3 3 3 3 3 FA LF,' . F, 3 3 Fi 3 F,' `,71 ,51 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 FA . LF ', F il 3 FA 3 : ,'1, F: =,,co 0 0 CO CLJ 7 3 7 a) 0 M 3 0 3 3 3 0.) 0, CU CU 0.) ad CD (L) CU (1) 3 3 3 a) 3 CU 3 3> > > > > U, in (t, > > 0 1/1 > V) to to > > > > > > > > > > Lc (n cn > (ri >Ln v' 0-0 -0 -0 s- L.. (- -0 t- -0 -0 -0 1:1-0.9 c.--0 i.--0-0 U

O D 000 oo ocl0000000000qop00000p0000000o 066666 6066666666660666666606666666UI 111 1/1 I.f1 UI Lf) UI UI UI 1.11 ul In L/1 in UI Ul Lin Lf1 UI UI UI UI U1 UI UI L/1 UI 1/1 Ul L/1 Ul 1.11 L/1 UI UlNNNNNN N N N N N N N N N N N N N NN-NNNNNNNNNNNNNN

o 0000000000000000000000000000000000o 0 0 oqqg °goo° 0000gogg000.000g000gooqo6 o o o u-1 o U) d O O in d o Ls)- Lri vi Lri U1Lei ci o ci ci o ciO UI 0 N. O N O N N UI N N UI LO UI N N O N N O O NNNN N N N O L/1 VI 0 LOLD (-I L.0 Ln m N v.( N (-I 4 Lf) NI 4 Ln CO M CO N N N M LO 0 L.C.1-1 'Zr UI1.--1CO cs4 CO q` rn N al el Lc? rs! lD T1 -! Li? M N *zr Q N M -! N N N <D rl a? a? `T. 00O ocv oo 00000 o 0000Nulr,o(Nor-l000t6

N N N 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 00 00 00 CO 00 CO 00 CO CO 00N. ,-I N. N. L -I (-I co (--1 r -I 1-I (-1 (-I e -I 00 (-1 (--I 00 <-1 1-1 1-1 L--1 -I R -I L -I 1-1 00 t -I (-I (-I (-4 00 CO 00 CO 00r -I0(-114 00.-40 0 00 0 0H00.-100000000 .-1 a a ro 0,--I ,-I (-1(-1,-I0 N4 0 ONNION NINNNNONNONNINNINNNNON N N N 0 0 0 0 0N--..... c...4 N ,..... ,..... N -......_ ...., --.... ...., ft., ..... N -....... .6., N -..., ......... -...., -....., -...... .... --ft._ ....., N -.ft., -..... ......... ,.... N N N N (N---... m "--.. ----. CO CO ---.. 0 N CO 4' LO 0) --, 0 t--1 --..... Cr) 4 L/) 0 (-I N O1 4 ,..... CO Tr (-I 01 ---- ---- ,.... --, --,0 (-I N 00 (-I N Lo .-I (-I (-I .-I (--I N (0 r -I (-I N 1-1 e -c 1.-1 N N N N N N N IN N CO Ln L0 01--, --, ".... --.... ',... '-, ----- `-, ---... `-... ---... ---... --.... --.... --... 'ft, --.... ",.. ----. ----- `,.. --, ---.. --.... ----- ----. --, "-, ----. --, --... ----. '6, 6--... --.....4' 4 UI Ln L/1 01 rn m m m m M m 'Ol' Cr Or 111 Ln L/1 VI UI UI UI UI CO (.0 L.0 10 (.0 LC/ N N N. N. N

LL

rero al 5,

C 0 cCu N _to

W s -I 13o

0

i Of

CZ

Cu

SS

0

4-0

0E

Cu

E

Lt./

U.

NOal

C

r7.1 7./Ln01c O c0

4° T3.17, In uo c rsi 0 00CL ..

u(Nic

oL- N. C 47..)0 7 .1.0/7' Li"CL/1

Lot C IC 0 3'0 3U L4 C75 .0 /// 0C :4.2-

iC...;T:' t', -...,

:5 n'..u

r -I oz ......4-.ro 0 - ID 36 L'" E coo V., ca o VD cv, cE 16 75

c`n ° .4.7) 0 0 05 ,.,:: rt.; e'^ . ,"' ... 8 .-

vi. 0 /3.1 U CLA

IL -..... 6 8 6J .5 fr! 0 -c ....... z.---- Ill N '5 0 ".2 o u

c112 o

c0 3 c --z

3 +- -:-7.! ? ! ,....-o4 `1'>. 0

c 0 N O.-00s7

CCO >'

rs g o -,.7., 6 ci E al E .2 t'o' a, o6 so. ,..) -c0 .- --- an - .,,Z ..-........ a./ M a N M 2_,,-;-_-, ,.; N LO L) Lro 6-1 4.0 to L.r) ,,, .1 E .--1 .-1 Lo m a u N N '-In -0 6 -0 ci ci a., Ei... .c...:_i t.e., o -i ta , o (-.1 - m .,., o 3 co o o .., cLu LE 6 rfi i'3

'-In -c oco

7),2711(7) Zrum <7) 73 3 ' '.2 a i Z x .5 5 6 TD Tf 5- 1; - Tu TI i 6 7) t ; '-' T., 71 ^ --- ----L A crl o 0 an ..e) -. Ci vi v) u-) -- v) cn -- ul tr3 (A = c.f) In In C v.) in 0 e N I=, c v.' c ero m 70.ccv, cc073cc-c.L-..ncc ..cc'^c7.,,oss.-torsid,..iu c c un3 7 ro z = z roE c ocoo0oocoo 0oo0ocoomoo.-0.-cEooc

Li- g) U aj U 0 47, U U CU a 13) U td '.3 U U :5 U C .47., L.) 0 4? lin 640 4', ....... 44' N. N. Y.) N. N 'L'm C N. N. C ".... N. N.\ N. 4"4 N. N... 0 -...... N. 4-"...... .4, /tLi N - C C Cc E

ro3E33L-33E3 3 E 3 3 3 3 3? 3 3 Tio 3 3? ,_..-,,.. j_$ro0,_.,cc,ccocccc:cccec,cc," cc,e,e,cc...._

Cru o .1! .0 0 .0 .0 0 .0 .0 o o .0 .0 0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 o 0 .0 /0 .0 .0 o .0 0 4- .° .0 r -I 0 0 0a z,-; t,'; ,' r, i ,^, r, tf; r, , , T, n ,' 3 n .c,9 ,T, '0, t',1 e t2 n ,-,i0 3 co 3 3 el 3 = ty cv 3 3 cid 3 3 3 3 7 C.1 3 7 11) 7 3 a.) c p) ....7, 3 7 CU GI IDE '5 c" '5 '1, 5) ' 5 ; 51 ' 5 '5 -1' trt '5 t`71' V, Y, t7,' ,Y, '5 .;,' ,`' '5 bl VI .5 ,51 '5 '65 ii) tA'5 '5U s- -0 10 LT la La 112 ,5 10 E 22 la la °_, lo la i3 la 2.). la Is IL' Is :5 E la E.' ii 15 I.5 E el, ,G2

o o t0000g00066666ogoogoorc00000000006oCo 0060000600000000606666666666660o0Lr) LA L/1 Ul Le) LlJ LA L.1-1 ix) N ul vl LA LI1 LI1 lA I/1 01 in 1.11 Ln LI-I 01 01 Lel ui u-+ Vl 111 01N N NNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N NNNNNNNNNNN N NNNNN

oo ocoacc000000000000000000rc000000000oo occ00000000000g00000000000000000006 6 vi vi 6 ui Lri ui v.; Lri ci O O Lei ci Lei O ci Lei Lei Lri Lri ci u-1 L1i ui Lei 6 Lri O ci Lri 6 6 6to O NNUINNNNN01010NLIINuIONNNNON.NNNONUIOrJOLrlinN NMHNCI1 N N ct Cr C71 VD VD n 0 N e -I v 41.'0* N tI N N Ln In

r`J M O1 eti '1 el '4'. es! `° L° -1 LP °C' L° -1 r4: C°. r`i "1 O1 'zr.0 111 0000 111000M0,-1 00NOMN00000N ONUDON ONO 1-1

03 CO00 00 00 00 CO CO 00 00 CO CO 03 00 CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO 00 00 CO 00 00 r -Ir -I 1-1 r -I N 1-1 g -I r -I c -I r -I CO CO CO 00 00 CO CO 00 1-4 %-1 vi 0 0000000000000r -I 1-1 00000000000000NNNNNNNNNNNNN0400000000NNNNNNNNN NNNNN","---N N N N N N N N U1 000 N 01 LID N N 7 Ln 4.0 N CO 0\\\\\\\\N M 4Cr L/1 LO N r-1 N M N 03 01 01 N 6-11-1 6-1 /-I 1-1 N N N N N N NMNMctLrlISDNCOC71 1-1 6-4 6-1 CN NNN N N (NN. N. N. N. N. N.. N. N. N. N. N. N. N.N. N. N. N. N. N. N. N. N. 0 0r- r- NNNNNNN CO 00 CO 03 CO 00 CO 00 03 03 0000 CO 03 00 03 00 CO 00 00 03 03 01 4-4 rl

O

OE

EI -

U111LL

rl

ONO

CU CU CU 0)°u't.0 c VI vLO Tr et ID ul

C z.-ICa)O6' -'C7 dC0Lrid/ 6 c -

opO 000.c%'013000 0 0000U U U 00 to U

13 == c ==CC ,.;= .2

0o= 4= 4=

.0 96 .0 .0 0 .0 o o oo .9).7)

», 3 )c) ._ 3 ;.j (A 3 », 3 3 3 3 ),)3 ¢.1 a .CU 3 4, a a.) 0J 0) 0) 3> 0 CO > > > > > > v,E =a La 45 v a i5 I' la a E 'I' La

C) CD CD 0 CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD 0 06 6 6 ci 6 6 d c) 6 6 6 6 6 cc 6o) Lc) VI N V1 ol Lr) U, v) U, Ul U, U, 1.11N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c) o o o o o o oO g o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o 6 6 0 Lli r0 IA 6 vi 6 6 6 6 vi ciO o o o c) NJ LI-1 N o r, Lr/ Lf) o v) N Lf1LC) N 01 ry1 CO 10 .--1 m Cr 0 m4 Lc) cn4 )-1a)

0co

CO '1:? '4'. '1". '4'. r") N'1 '1* ric 'zr 'I'L.' . . 1? N: .-io .-i00 1.0000000 L0000 Nr -I

CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO0000

00-1 .--1 CO CO01 01 al0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.1 1-1 0 0 1-1NINNINNNNNOONC11000N N

0) et en Lti N. CO Cr)r-1 Nr-1 N 1-1 a-1 I-1 NrcINMinUllON1-1 N0 0 t-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 N N N-1 N 1-4 N 1-4 a-1 a-1 N <-1 1-1 r-1 N N

In

CM

0U

t:U0

4.)

OE

C0

00C)-

-0LWO OD ODC C

C1- OJro to2 0. in. o.

0 0 o 000000 0O ci r-: a0

00

00 CO CO00 -1o 0 0 0

N N NN r",m Cr COr-1 T N N N..N 00 CO CO 00

O_o

NJO

9)

-a3

NJU.)

Lt).0NJ

(.71

-a3

DJ-<

0

B

NJ

NJ

CU

-a3

NJCU

3

00

roCr

-o3

LI1n

CD CDIT ISIL IL0 ,3 0p

' 3

Iv

0 N U.)

INJ N N1NJ VI V1 N (.77 NJ I-1 II% (J1 N U1 {..n NJ LC1 V1

0I-

Co

00

19

IL

3

NJ 1,..) IL ILW lI Lf1 UJ N I-%

> D D D D >C C C CC C C COD OD OD OD OD cm on on

I-%UJ

.74

C C C C C(2/ kp NJ CO I-% I" I-% I-% I-%

114 i.J.J Fa 1:-% (J./ ° ' A NjO o t.n 0 - to (J.J

-0 I-% -0 0 0 VII:1 VI NA 6.3 .0

0 (J.13 oLZ) "t, 3 0

-0 7 -0 P a OJj .

37

I-% NJ AI1J 'NJ NJ NJ UJ UJ

vi u.) to .0. to to .C:t. co u1 u -t

fDfD 0

rozrl

<

CTI OI

".< 0CD =tn

0)

-t

tDvi

0I -

CD

TO

O0)

Cto-1

0

0)

01LP -1) t, [so

k D i> 2> 2>

-C 'C5G) $ c<3 7 7 7A A A

rlt,- 0) 0) Ui

3

N

rs-) 0 3 -a -0Cu Cu

3 3 F,3 3

CO

VIp cs). 3 3 A '

7 Lc, So ., Li' Ln3 i s--, /.:5 71-' o ':' 4' B

1.'S 3iL i5J . .

1-, Lis 7 in co

NJ

2>

N l02> 2> 2>

721 7

00

2>-3

V2>

7

Ln

2>

7 -0

L')

-aT>-a 0)

LP cr,

IL 01 cir, L» A A I-1 C)V 01 Z.Z3In " 0

Win 0 to0co

000

01

NJ

(2).,

OO'44

0O

O00)

O6:40

07

-cs -cs -csj j wPi-, 1$3

3 3I -

1--,

7 0)

3 37

F-, 3

I-1 I-11-k 0

$

71 -InrD rDCr Cr

OIL NJ

Fo °O -0

N.)

O

LP-nro

-a

3

NJ

4)00)

00

rDcr

-a

3

NJ

0)

3

A in in I-,!.P " 0 0. V NJ

cr, in in i.rs L.rs in in in Ln in in in cn w t..) us cn V VI cr, in 1-, in in

co3

=-a -csar- a-

ro o o,-. a a3 rD fa070 rl ri0 0* 0 7,-71:n y < <7- S rr) rD

-s -,te, cr,0 M 0) 0),-, ,--,.

.< 5 5co fD rD

* *=

Y,-,

.

7.. :0) '

.= a-ar7 as as* *o71.. < .<5 O

rD rD

0 --s ,Ip-s

O 0 0O 0 7CD MI rD

0r, r

0,

0O 0 0<ro<

<ro ro."

0)VI

Cu0 te

a),

oo.,-... .-«

O 5 5C7 CC 77C* * *,=.: x.: ,=.:S = a -

ET 0) o7* * *-< ...< -<rD rD CD-S -5 -1,v, v, !^C) nCu 0)O FC a0) ck7,-..5 o

.71'.

a atr$ in

0rE)

0

rou,0)

O

C7

0)

IDrD

te,

O0000

I-

0

N.) IL 00i:rs 1""

'-' O -9 oI:3 3 9)

(1-,

34'3.

OIs)

3

N., 11

NJ

I) P")VI IJJ

= -0 =

0arD

C)O

ro

0)

O

C)

0)C

In

°P '74 9) A (;')C C C CC CC

0

O

N 1-,/J.) NJ 1-,

C

.

3

C3

CJI

O

C

N.)

3

NJ

C

NJ

"0

00

0)

0

3

0

N.)

4."

0) 0)<W

P oto U.)W°0 -a

3N.)

N

0)

00

O73

NJ

3

0041- - - -) -)r -

KEEKKEEKEKEE0.) Mt Cu Co 0) CU CU Co Cu CI) CV

-< -t< < < -< -<A A A in to Ln tv to A,po 00 ° U.) 6o 6.)

? 9 U.) 9 U.) 9' 90 P° V P :.1 o .P 3 V to 0 P7 1-, 1-, w G.) ":-1 LQ 13 IL000PooL6,100,

13 13 1--) 13 WO c,jj!'?-0P3 ' 3. . W . 13 LO IL

rs.) , o 3 o NJ31-, 13 . 1-`

NJNINN.) b/J.) a) a) o) I, o p 3c-)

00 o 0 NNP 1-, W A A 1_,ul (xi V in in Lo cr, cn in in N 4, in co .4. in in 41) in a, cr, Ol in In in in in 1-, vi

0)

500

N

O

0O-h3<CDD

130P'

0

0)

ro

0)

0OCrr

rDroQ

5CD

rD

-oro

0)0.

00

130rt.Cr

rD

*,

5.00

Oro

0

0)

0)Cr0C

CD

ro0.-hO

5*ro

rF

tox-orD

3QO

(-13

00)

00

co"

ro

CD

0)

()(,)

Cu0-5

o0

O

r

-0rD

CO

0

trt0

03fD

0)

C0)

0N

13

0CD

0

ro

t/Icu-0co)

74:

0)

rD

CO0)

0

00

CD

0

-<rD`

ro

(.71'

-oCU

500

-h00-fD

0

0

73 -1(13

O CD

C17at 7

00O

M-)11.

a) 03

oC

ct)

*cn

rD

O

fD

0)VtfD

-0rD

O .7).

ro00

O -aa 01

< -0rD

0)

0

1T1

CD

r .. = = 3-,. co- ro= -2.

an CM CIO CM OQ 00 7C -)CM-0 13 to '0 'CI 13 -00) 0) = C1.1 0) CU 0113 0 < 73 '0 -0CD CD at CD fD a) (o ,-,

*-) -) -% -%0: 0 0: 0:0 0 2 0

O 0 0o 5, = o.-/. rt. rt.3 5 5C * C C.5' = 5 5ost = 00 OD

0 ta) = 3rD * CD CD

VI rD VI v1-C1 -) "CS 130) Ii, GU 11)

-0 13 13CO CD CD-I _5 -I

-I -,CD CD

VI CO VI(1) CD CD0) 0) 0)-) -1 -1n n rt=- 7- =

fr,

coIn

0)

C

Oco

rD

FIT

O00)

13)

71i

5001:30)

CD

-

00

-o

0.05

O

ro

C0)

0)

t-1)

0)0.3

00

rD

0)

-a

CD

CD

00

N.)

0)CDCD-ts

olT> ca c C»'30 CIO GO 00 00).0 00 S.C. 1/2) LC)

0) Lk) 0). .

3 B c?

$

U.) A lf) 0 017 a 7 1 73 3 3 3

-0

CPI 00 00

0CC

ao

Lc)

01

3

L(:)0

3

lD

C00

0)

0

0

3

CO

C0000co

3

73

5>

0000

30)

01

C00

0)

3

U.)

U1 t.0 1.."1 tD VI CO CO 01

Vl

5>C

00NJ

61

0W

0

-03

ffir

CCOil

In

CCOil

7

W r..) N N..) N NJ NJ0 U0 CO V 01 U1 AI I I I I

IV W01 LrE N V7 In tri

a. /:3-s

fD 0- 130.) rDrD

QO-110- ro

r -la) DJ

3 c0

0)

d<CD

In

Y.1)

9

073

001-)01 Cn 1.1.) 9- lD

CCCCCCCCCCO6.1OFU

3

U.)

'0

In

90'

LZ)

I-I --

-a3.

NJ

U.)O

0)

I-.UJ U.)triN WO1NLn

Ln In U1 (n Ntri Ul NJ 00 .10 Ul NJ

Ls a -0CD

0)

on

O

ro

0

a -0 -0 -061 6' 6'-0 0 0

CU 0100 0- 0-

00 aCi

0- 0.r0 CD CDN

'0 100 03 0 In0O 5 5z

0

,=5*DO

0)

fD

.11/

CDD

0)0-

cro

O

rc.

0.0

3fD

0)

0001

0.1-1$

01

on

2fD

0

Lb

C

Ort

00

fD

00

30)

CD

0)H0)

-CD

-00

10

ri.

S00

CD

0)

0)

_

(CD

0

fD

CU

ao

O

ro

-00

5O

0 = r7t3

-00tn

5(-*

CD

CD

5'00

01est.fD

0)

0)

0_

-oO

-a0)

QO

15.

0-

0

0rF

-t

71:

0)

In

CD

0)

0C

CD

CDCD

0--h

co

fDXro

ao

3

CD- s.0)

c7C

0)O

0

P.

-0

-00)

00

Oo_ro

0

0

fD-0

00

00.CD

0

5.

0NJ NJl0 V6 6CD CD

(-)

ILACo03

0°)O

WI -A NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ N..)o Lo cp ,..I 4,=. W 00 Cr) 12. UJ I' ?(%) c.:n er) (.0-) v) c.n en i> i> > T> T> >CD CD ti) CD CD CD ID c C C C C C-0 10 -0 TS MS -0 -0 OD CIO cm 00 cry 001-4 W U.) NJ c.D i--& i-s Vi 1--& A A t.01--k

iJ:) U.) U.) i-% N N Li) I-' On 1;.) i-:,

U9 o 9 1-, r.) IL o 1.6 o u-,,531 -.1 - NJ ' 0 CA)0 U -I Cu

01-1 t0 sp(A11 pLn U.) C) 7:3 B k.2) t p0... .37 u, °I

., u, t.0 3 L.1 73 P. 0 LO 1_,0

I-1 1-' MS

UiP -0U.)

NJNJ -0 . Y1

N.) oW 3

1:-)O B r,'"' T o , , -a-cs N ,--, U.) 1-.> ,--, -cs 1-0 O N.) 0 NJ c? N.) 0

NJ Aiss) 91 is.) ism) N P P W U.) W

1- vl N (n r.) Li, in J Lri kr' (xi

z =

,76 ig-a) a.) rDQ = o_ CD

a) 5 'P r, go =.*0 0-.0 F. 03 Fp. 3 ,,co

3 LA 3rD cu co .<0= ''..5 ,...I. ,-4. y,)

5' = 500 c^ Do0 * 0= 7.... =-m-ro F.

DO 0.) 00E t{ O)

o_ -m< o_O _n:' or) (.,) cnC c3 3m rD= =,.,. ,.N Ul

= r. a) : -0 = = co tIn 0- cf)o 0 v,EA'

rGt5 ro

00 r) 000O07 z ai<

mCD cil a)cr) r". lel

*71: =

VI XI:= =CD * CDx .=1: xD) = a)3 07 35 5'cu -c a)..-.

rD F-0..

5. , o= v) =v) v)o 0

-INo 0-.= =ro a),rD cox x

73 -c:srD rD

.,-.V) 0

Compass Demographics Inc INVOICEDavid Ely6575 N Vista StreetSan Gabriel, CA 91775Phone (626) 285-3074

Email Ely@Compass-Demographics.com

BILL TO:Kevin ShenkmanShenkman & Hughes28905 Wight RoadMalibu, CA 90265

DATE: March 10, 2019INVOICE # 190407A

FOR: PNA V Santa MonicaCVRA analysis

DESCRIPTION QUANTITY RATE AMOUNT

CVRA - Database,Analysis,Mapping and Testimony 324.50 $300 $ 97,350.00

Political Data Inc. $ 132.76

TOTAL $ 97,482.76

Please make checks payable to Compass Demographics Inc. (EIN 90-0877169)For questions regarding the services covered by this invoice, pleasecontact Dave Ely at (626) 285-3074.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!

Date Task Hours

7/10/2015 Meet with M. Hughes 4.5

7/12/2015 Initial Database Geography 5.757/13/2015 Geographic data review and testing 5.5

7/14/2015 Election Data processing 2.5

7/15/2015 Election Data processing 2.75

7/26/2015 Election Data review and testing 3

7/27/2015 Meet with M. Hughes 5

7/28/2015 Election Data processing 6

7/30/2015 Election Data processing 3.25

8/1/2015 Election Data processing 3.758/4/2015 Election Data processing 3

8/9/2015 Election Data processing 2.5

8/12/2015 Election Data review and testing 6.75

8/13/2015 Meet with M. Hughes 5.5

2/22/2016 Preliminary review of remedy effectiveness 5

7/1/2016 Census Geographic data 6.75

7/18/2016 Census Demographic data processing 2.25

8/17/2016 Census Demographic data processing 2.5

8/30/2016 Election data processing 4

12/6/2016 Geo and Election Data update 6.25

12/21/2016 Election Data review and testing 2.5

2/11/2017 Election Data processing 5.752/12/2017 Election Data review and testing 3

2/21/2017 Election Data review and testing 1.5

5/5/2017 Historical Census research 3

5/23/2017 Candidate address preliminary analysis 3.25

6/8/2017 Meeting with K. Shenkman and J. Jones 4

6/21/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 5.25

6/22/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 6

6/23/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 4.756/27/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 5.5

7/3/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 6

7/5/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 3.25

7/10/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 7.257/11/2017 Meeting with J. Jones 6

7/24/2017 Geographic data supplement 1.5

7/25/2017 Meet with K. Shenkman, A. Alarcon and A. Gonzalez 4

7/26/2017 Geographic data review and testing 6.2510/16/2017 Election Data update 3

12/29/2017 Demographic data update and merge 6.751/5/2018 Election Data update 5.5

2/12/2018 Geographic analysis 5.25

2/13/2018 Geographic analysis 2.53/16/2018 Work with K. Shenkman on case and report 3

3/19/2018 Work with K. Shenkman on case and report 2

3/20/2018 Election recreations 4

4/4/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 2.754/5/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 4.54/9/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 3.5

4/24/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 4.754/27/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 5

4/30/2018 Meet with K. Shenkman, A. Alarcon and A. Sanchez 3.5

5/3/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 3.25

5/9/2018 Meet with M. Hughes 4.25

5/14/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 3.755/17/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 3.5

5/22/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 3

5/27/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 5.55/29/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 6.255/30/2018 SJ opposition, review and analysis 2.56/12/2018 Defendant expert review 1.75

7/3/2018 Meet with M. Grimes, K. Shenkman and T. Crane 6.57/5/2018 Meet with M. Grimes, M. Hughes and K. Shenkman 4

7/9/2018 Depo prep, analysis and review 2.757/10/2018 Depo prep, analysis and review 6

7/12/2018 Deposition travel 2.257/13/2018 Declaration prep, analysis and review 6.57/23/2018 Declaration prep, analysis and review 2

7/27/2018 Declaration prep, analysis and review 6

7/30/2018 Declaration prep, analysis and review 4

7/31/2018 Declaration prep, analysis and review 5.5

8/1/2018 Trial Prep 4.58/2/2018 Trial Prep and Testimony 5.75

8/3/2018 Trial Prep and Testimony 9

8/6/2018 Consult for Morrison crossexam 3

12/3/2018 Remedy Brief 3.75

1/18/2019 Remedy review 2.5

Total 324.5@$300/hr $ 97,350.00