Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias and effects of...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in l-DOPA-induced dyskinesias and effects of...
1 23
Journal of Neural TransmissionBasic Neurosciences, Genetics andImmunology, Movement disorders,Dementias, Biological Psychiatry,Biological Child and AdolescentPsychiatry ISSN 0300-9564Volume 118Number 12 J Neural Transm (2011) 118:1733-1742DOI 10.1007/s00702-010-0571-8
Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in l-DOPA-induceddyskinesias and effects of sarizotan in the6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat model ofParkinson’s diseaseManfred Gerlach, Gerd D. Bartoszyk,Peter Riederer, Olivia Dean & Maartenvan den Buuse
1 23
Your article is protected by copyright and
all rights are held exclusively by Springer-
Verlag. This e-offprint is for personal use only
and shall not be self-archived in electronic
repositories. If you wish to self-archive your
work, please use the accepted author’s
version for posting to your own website or
your institution’s repository. You may further
deposit the accepted author’s version on a
funder’s repository at a funder’s request,
provided it is not made publicly available until
12 months after publication.
Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptorsin L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias and effects of sarizotan in the6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat model of Parkinson’s disease
Manfred Gerlach • Gerd D. Bartoszyk •
Peter Riederer • Olivia Dean • Maarten van den Buuse
Received: 7 December 2010 / Accepted: 17 December 2010 / Published online: 21 January 2011
� Springer-Verlag 2011
Abstract Sarizotan, a 5-HT1A agonist with additional
affinity for D3 and D4 receptors, has been demonstrated to
have anti-dyskinetic effects. The mechanism by which these
effects occur is not clear. Using unilateral 6-hydroxydop-
amine-lesioned rats that received chronic intraperitoneal (ip)
administration of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)
we investigated the involvement of D3 and 5-HT1A receptors
in the effects of sarizotan on contraversive circling and
abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs). Before sensitiza-
tion by chronic L-DOPA treatment (12.5 with 3.25 mg/kg
benserazide ip, twice daily for 21 days), no effect of the
selective D3 agonist, PD128907 (1 or 3 mg/kg ip), or the
selective D3 antagonist, GR103691 (0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg ip), was
observed. Treatment with sarizotan (1 or 5 mg/kg ip) dose-
dependently inhibited the L-DOPA-induced contraversive
turning and AIMs. In co-treatment with the 5-HT1A antago-
nist, WAY100635 (1 mg/kg ip), sarizotan failed to affect this
behaviour, confirming the prominent 5-HT1A receptor-medi-
ated mechanism of action. In the presence of PD128907
(3 mg/kg ip), the effects of sarizotan on contraversive turning,
locomotive dyskinesia and axial dystonia, but not on orolin-
gual and forelimb dyskinesia, were blocked. On its own,
PD128907 had no effect on the behavioural effects of L-DOPA
except that it tended to reduce orolingual and forelimb dys-
kinesia. GR103691 had no effect on its own or in combination
with sarizotan. These data identify an involvement of D3
receptors in the action of sarizotan on some, but not all
L-DOPA-induced motor side effects. This selective involve-
ment is in contrast to the more general involvement of 5-HT1A
receptors in the anti-dyskinetic effects of sarizotan.
Keywords L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia � Abnormal
involuntary movements � Sarizotan � Parkinson therapy �Dopamine D3 receptors � Serotonin 5-HT1A receptors
Abbreviations
AIMs Abnormal involuntary movements
ip Intraperitoneally and introperitoneal, respectively
L-DOPA Levodopa, L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine
LID L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia
PD Parkinson’s disease
5-HT Serotonin, 5-hydroxytryptamine
6-OHDA 6-Hydroxydopamine
Introduction
The mainstay of treatment in Parkinson’s disease (PD) has
been palliative treatment for dopamine deficiency with
M. Gerlach (&)
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Laboratory for Clinical
Neurobiology, University of Wurzburg, Fuchsleinstrasse 15,
97080 Wurzburg, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
G. D. Bartoszyk
Extended Profiling, Medical Science and Innovation,
Merck Serono Research and Development,
Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany
P. Riederer
Laboratory for Clinical Neurochemistry,
Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy,
and National Parkinson Foundation Centers of Excellence for
Neurodegenerative Diseases Research, University of Wurzburg,
Fuchsleinstrasse 15, 97080 Wurzburg, Germany
O. Dean � M. van den Buuse
Behavioural Neuroscience Laboratory, Mental Health Research
Institute, 155 Oak Street, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
123
J Neural Transm (2011) 118:1733–1742
DOI 10.1007/s00702-010-0571-8
Author's personal copy
L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA, levodopa) and a
peripherally active amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor
such as benserazide and carbidopa. This treatment usually
provides a sustained clinical benefit to patients. However,
after a few years of treatment, motor complications, par-
ticularly motor fluctuations such as wearing off, on–off
phenomena, and several different types of L-DOPA-
induced dyskinesia (LID) such as peak-dose, diphasic,
wearing-off, chorea, dystonia and athetosis, limit its use-
fulness (Jankovic 2005). Dyskinesia consists of two com-
ponents: the execution of involuntary movements in
response to drug administration, and the priming phe-
nomenon that underlies these movement’s establishment
and persistence (Jenner 2008; Nadjar et al. 2009). The
precise pathophysiology of these motor effects is not
defined, although many theories have been postulated.
Recent clinical and experimental findings indicate that
dyskinesia is associated with many functionally related
abnormalities in neurotransmitter systems which lead to
abnormalities in the rate, pattern and synchronisation of
neuronal activity within and outside the basal ganglia
(Brotchie 2005; Cenci 2007; Jenner 2008). Based on this
knowledge several approaches have been developed that
may prevent the development of LID in patients with PD or
that may reduce these involuntary movements without
antagonising the effects of the concomitant anti-Parkinso-
nian medication (Brotchie 2005; Fox et al. 2006; Muller
and Russ 2006). One of these approaches targets the
serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) system (for exam-
ple: Rylander et al. 2010; Zeng et al. 2010). Mounting
evidence (Arai et al. 1998; Muller and Russ 2006; Carta
et al. 2007; Eskow et al. 2009) suggests that the non-
physiological release of dopamine by 5-HT neurons leads
to the development of LID. Indeed, it was demonstrated in
experimental models of dyskinesia that lesions of rostral
raphe nuclei reduce the development of LID (Eskow et al.
2009) and administration of 5-HT1A agonists reduces LID
without impairing L-DOPA-improved motor performance
(Bibbiani et al. 2001; Srinivasan and Schmidt 2004; Dupre
et al. 2007; Eskow et al. 2009).
In rats, LID can be modelled via intracerebral injec-
tion of the dopaminergic neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine
(6-OHDA)—that damages the nigrostriatal pathway (Gerlach
and Riederer 1996)—followed by chronic administration of
low doses of L-DOPA. This treatment causes a sensitization
of the contraversive circling response (Henry et al. 1999)
and characteristic abnormal involuntary movements
(AIMs) with dyskinesia-associated cellular responses
(Lundblad et al. 2004). This model has been pharmaco-
logically validated and represents a cost-effective alterna-
tive to non-human primates for screening drugs with
potential anti-dyskinetic properties (Lundblad et al. 2002;
Dekundy et al. 2007).
Sarizotan is a novel compound with full 5-HT1A
receptor agonist properties and additional high affinity for
dopamine D3 and D4 receptors (Bartoszyk et al. 2004). In
rodent and primate models of PD, administration of sari-
zotan was shown to reduce LID without affecting the
efficacy of L-DOPA (Bibbiani et al. 2001; Gregoire et al.
2009, Marin et al. 2009). In PD patients with LID, sari-
zotan has been reported to attenuate these disabling motor
side effects at low doses (Olanow et al. 2004; Goetz et al.
2007) and prolong the efficacy of L-DOPA in patients with
advanced PD (Bara-Jimenez et al. 2005). The mechanism
of action of sarizotan has not been completely elucidated.
The present study was therefore focused on the role of
dopamine D3 receptors in LID and effects of sarizotan. The
effects of sarizotan on sensitization of the contraversive
circling response and AIMs were tested in combination
with PD128907 (a selective D3 agonist; Pugsley et al.
1995) or GR103691, a selective dopamine D3 antagonist
(Audinot et al. 1998). In addition, we confirmed a role of
the 5-HT1A receptor by testing the effect of WAY100635, a
selective HT1A antagonist (Ahlenius et al. 1999), in com-
bination with sarizotan.
Materials and methods
Materials
L-DOPA, benserazide and all other substances were of the
highest purity and were purchased from Sigma Chemical
Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sarizotan HCl (EMD 128130;
batch EE79580) was a gift from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt,
Germany). L-DOPA was administered as the methyl ester
form, as it is more stable and soluble than non-esterified
DOPA. L-DOPA methyl ester is rapidly de-esterified in
vivo by non-specific esterases to form L-DOPA (Cooper
et al. 1984). In all experiments L-DOPA was administered
at the same time as benserazide. All drugs were dissolved
in sterile saline (except where indicated) and injected
intraperitoneally (ip) at a volume of 1 ml/kg of body
weight. Sarizotan and GR103691 were dissolved and son-
icated in DMSO which was then diluted with distilled
water to the required dose and volume to an end concen-
tration of 1–5% DMSO. PD128907 was dissolved in
straight 5% DMSO.
Animals
Animal experiments were carried out at the Behavioural
Neuroscience Laboratory, Mental Health Research Insti-
tute, Melbourne, Australia. All procedures complied with
the NIH Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals.
1734 M. Gerlach et al.
123
Author's personal copy
The University of Melbourne Animal Experimentation
Ethics Committee approved all surgical techniques, treat-
ments and experimental protocols.
Male Sprague–Dawley rats (Animal Resource Centre,
Canning Vale, Western Australia) weighing 250–300 g
were housed in pairs on a 12-h light/dark cycle with an
ambient temperature of 21 ± 2�C. Rats had access to
standard rat chow and water ad libitum.
6-OHDA lesion surgeries
The rat hemiparkinsonian rat model with unilaterally
6-OHDA lesioning was generated as we described previ-
ously (Gerlach et al. 2004). In brief, the animals were
treated ip with pargyline (5 mg/kg) and desipramine
(20 mg/kg) to enhance the effect of 6-OHDA on dopamine
neurons and to block its effect on noradrenergic neurons,
respectively. The rats were then anesthetized with isoflu-
rane and mounted in a Kopf stereotaxic frame equipped
with a mouth mask to deliver gas anaesthetic. Unilateral
6-OHDA lesion of the median forebrain bundle was done
in the right side of the brain. Stereotaxic coordinates were
-2.8 mm from bregma, 2 mm lateral and 9 mm ventral to
the skull surface (Paxinos and Watson 1997). A volume of
2.5 ll of 6-OHDA HCl solution (5 mg/ml with 0.1%
ascorbic acid) was injected over 5 min. The rats were
allowed 3 weeks of post-operative recovery.
Treatment regimens
The entire experiment was done in one large cohort of
6-OHDA-lesioned rats that were selected on the basis of
preliminary experiments to assess spontaneous and apo-
morphine-induced turning responses (data not shown). On
day 0 (Table 1), animals were tested with sarizotan,
PD128907 or GR103691, to assess possible activity of the
various drugs to induce turning behaviour in the non-
sensitized state.
The next step was aimed at assessing the mechanisms
involved in the ability of sarizotan to inhibit L-DOPA-
induced turning and AIMs (Table 1). Therefore, all rats
were ip injected twice per day (around 9 a.m. and around
5 p.m.) with 12.5 mg/kg of L-DOPA methyl ester and
3.25 mg/kg of benserazide, except on experimental days
where only one injection of the combination was given.
The development of sensitization to this chronic treatment
was verified on day 7 and day 14 of treatment. The results
from these two measurement days were also used to select
the 36 best responders to L-DOPA before further tests with
sarizotan, PD128907, GR103691 and WAY100635 were
done. The studies on the mechanism of action of sarizotan
on L-DOPA responses were conducted on days 21, 24, 27
and 30 after the start of L-DOPA treatment.
Behavioural measurements
Rotational behaviour was measured by an automated
Rotacount system (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH,
USA) as described previously (Gerlach et al. 2004),
allowing unbiased recording of full and partial clockwise
and counter-clockwise turns. The number of full clockwise
(ipsiversive) and counter-clockwise (contraversive) turns
was recorded every 5 min during 2 h.
AIMs were assessed according to Cenci et al. (1998).
They were classified into four subtypes: locomotive dys-
kinesia, i.e. increased locomotion with contralateral side
bias; axial dystonia, i.e. contralateral twisted posturing of
the neck and upper body; orolingual dyskinesia; i.e. ste-
reotyped jaw movements and contralateral tongue protru-
sion; forelimb dyskinesia, i.e. repetitive rhythmic jerks of
dystonic posturing of the contralateral forelimb and/or
grabbing movements of the contralateral paw. For each of
these four subtypes, a score from 0 to 4 (0 = absence;
4 = severe) was given and a total score calculated. AIMs
were recorded by an observer every 5 min for about 10 s.
Data analyses
All rotation data and AIMs data were collected in an Excel
spreadsheet to calculate total summed scores and group
averages. From a small number of vehicle-treated controls
on every testing day, we compiled a combined vehicle
group to which the effects of all drug treatments were
compared. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of
the mean (SEM). Using the statistical software pack-
age Systat (version 9.0, SPSS Inc., USA), groups were
compared with analysis of variance (ANOVA). When
P \ 0.05, differences between groups were considered
statistically significant.
Results
Before the start of chronic L-DOPA treatment, no signifi-
cant effect was observed of any of the doses of sarizotan,
the selective D3 receptor agonist, PD128907, or the
selective D3 receptor antagonist, GR103691 (not shown).
Rats with a unilateral 6-OHDA lesion chronically treated
with L-DOPA showed increased total numbers of contra-
versive rotation on 7 and 14 days of treatment (data not
shown). The L-DOPA-treated rats also showed develop-
ment of AIMs on day 21 and later.
Effects of sarizotan on turning behaviour and AIMs
Injection of 12.5 mg/kg of L-DOPA with 3.25 mg/kg
of benserazide ip in chronically-treated rats induced
Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias 1735
123
Author's personal copy
contraversive turning which was maximal at 15–75 min
after injection. Treatment with 1 and 5 mg/kg of sarizotan
caused a dose-dependent and significant reduction of this
turning behaviour (Fig. 1). Since the effect of L-DOPA and
of sarizotan was most clear at 15–75 min after injection,
the remaining analysis only includes data from this time
segment. The frequency of all AIMs, i.e. locomotive dys-
kinesia, axial dystonia, orolingual dyskinesia and forelimb
dyskinesia, between 15 and 75 min after L-DOPA injection
was dose-dependently and significantly reduced by pre-
treatment with sarizotan (Fig. 1).
Effects of PD128907 on turning behaviour and AIMs
Injection of 1 mg/kg ip of the selective dopamine D3
receptor agonist, PD128907, had no significant effect on
turning behaviour and AIMs (data not shown). Injection of
3 mg/kg of PD128907 significantly reduced forelimb dys-
kinesia and tended to reduce orolingual dyskinesia (Fig. 2).
In the presence of 3 mg/kg of PD128907, sarizotan failed
to significantly reduce contraversive turning, locomotive
dyskinesia and axial dystonia, but there was no change in
the effect of sarizotan on orolingual dyskinesia and fore-
limb dyskinesia (Fig. 2). In addition, axial dystonia scores
were significantly higher in the animals treated with both
PD128907 and sarizotan compared to sarizotan alone
(Fig. 2). Thus, stimulating the dopamine D3 receptor
appeared to influence only specific aspects of the AIMs.
Effects of GR103691 on turning behaviour and AIMs
Injection of 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg ip of the selective dopamine
D3 receptor antagonist, GR103691, had no effect on turning
behaviour and AIMs (Table 2). In addition, co-treatment
with GR103691 (1.5 mg/kg) had no significant effect on
L-DOPA-induced turning behaviour following sarizotan
treatment. However, there was a trend that it enhanced some
effects of sarizotan, i.e. axial, orolingual and forelimb dys-
kinesia (Table 2).
Effects of WAY100635 on turning behaviour and AIMs
Injection of 1 mg/kg of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist,
WAY100635, had no effect on the number of contralateral
turns or AIMs scores. In the presence of co-treatment with
WAY100635, 5 mg/kg of sarizotan had no effect on turn-
ing or AIMs (Table 2), confirming its prominent 5-HT1A
receptor-mediated mechanism of action.
Discussion
The major findings of the present study are: (1) sarizo-
tan and the dopamine D3 receptor agonist/antagonist,
PD128907/GR103691, have no anti-parkinsonian activity
in unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rats; (2) acute treatment
with sarizotan (5 mg/kg ip) reduced sensitized contraver-
sive circling and attenuated AIMs induced by chronic
L-DOPA treatment in unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rats
while eliciting no effect on the contraversive circling in
non-L-DOPA-primed animals; (3) co-treatment with the
higher dose of the dopamine D3 receptor agonist PD128907
(3 mg/kg ip) blocked at least some of the behavioural
effects of sarizotan, while co-treatment with the antagonist
GR103691 (0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg ip) had no effect; (4) co-
treatment with the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor antagonist
WAY100635 (1 mg/kg ip) blocked the action of sarizotan
on all AIM categories and on turning behaviour.
Table 1 Timetable for experiments
Day 21 Surgery of animals to induce unilateral 6-OHDA lesions of the median forebrain bundle
Day 0 Testing of ip administered drugs in non-sensitized rats: sarizotan 1 or 5 mg/kg, PD128907
1 or 3 mg/kg, GR103691 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg, vehicle or (for comparison) apomorphine
Day 1 Start of chronic treatment with 12.5 mg/kg of L-DOPA methyl ester and 3.25 mg/kg of benserazide ip, twice daily
Day 7 Confirming L-DOPA-induced turning behaviour (no AIMs recorded)
Day 14 Confirming L-DOPA-induced turning behaviour (no AIMs recorded)
Day 21 L-DOPA sensitized rats were tested with sarizotan (1 or 5 mg/kg ip), PD128907
(1 or 3 mg/kg ip) or GR103691 (0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg ip), or vehicle
Day 24 L-DOPA sensitized rats were tested with sarizotan (1 or 5 mg/kg ip), PD128907 (1 or 3 mg/kg ip) or GR103691
(0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg ip), or vehicle
Day 27 L-DOPA sensitized rats were tested with vehicle, WAY100635 (1 mg/kg ip) or sarizotan 5 mg/kg ip plus WAY100635
Day 30 L-DOPA sensitized rats were tested with vehicle, PD128907 (3 mg/kg ip) plus sarizotan (5 mg/kg ip),
or GR103691 (1.5 mg/kg ip) plus sarizotan (5 mg/kg ip)
6-OHDA 6-hydroxydopamine, AIMs abnormal involuntary movements, ip, intraperitoneally, L-DOPA L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine, levodopa,
GR103691 {49-acetyl-N-{4-[(2-methoxy-phenyl)-piperazin-1-yl]-butyl}-biphenyl-4-carboxamide (selective D3 receptor antagonist), PD128907{(4aR,10bR)-3,4,4a,10b-tetrahydro-4-propyl-2H,5H-[1]-benzopyrano-[4,3-b]-1,4-oxazin-9-ol} (selective D3 receptor agonist), WAY100635N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexane-carboxaminde (5-HT1A receptor selective antagonist)
1736 M. Gerlach et al.
123
Author's personal copy
The unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned rat is a widely used
animal model of PD which enables simple and automated
quantification of behavioural responses to drug treatments
(Ungerstedt and Arburthnott 1970; Gerlach and Riederer
1996). Classically, contraversive circling in rats with uni-
lateral 6-OHDA lesions is taken as an indication of the
potential of compounds to reverse the motor symptoms of
PD. L-DOPA and selective dopamine D2 receptor agonists
all evoke contraversive rotations in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats
as a result of post-synaptic dopamine stimulation and a
supersensitivity of dopamine receptors on the lesioned side.
In the first part of this study (before the start of the chronic
L-DOPA treatment), we were interested in determining the
potential anti-parkinsonian activity of sarizotan and the
dopamine D3 receptor agonist/antagonist, PD128907/
GR103691. No significant effect was observed of any of
these drugs. Recently, Lane et al. (2006) suggested that the
contraversive circling may not represent just anti-parkin-
sonian activity but may also indicate the ability to induce
or prime for dyskinesia. This is reinforced by the finding
that in contrast to L-DOPA and dopamine D2 receptor
agonists, BTS 74 398 (a monoamine uptake inhibitor)
neither sensitizes rotational behaviour in 6-OHDA-lesioned
rats nor induces dyskinesia in MPTP-treated primates
primed with L-DOPA (see Lane et al. 2006). Therefore, our
results suggest that sarizotan does have a low potential to
induce or prime for dyskinesia.
Chronic treatment of unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned rats
with L-DOPA induced enhanced contraversive turning
response and was considered indicative of dyskinesiogenic
Fig. 1 The effect of
intraperitoneal treatment with
1 or 5 mg/kg of sarizotan (Sar1
and Sar5, respectively) on
contraversive turning and
abnormal involuntary
movements (AIMs) in rats
which had unilateral 6-OHDA-
induced lesions and were
chronically treated with
L-DOPA and benserazide.
Sarizotan pre-treatment dose-
dependently reduced L-DOPA-
induced turning and AIMs. Rats
were treated intraperitoneally
(ip) with L-DOPA methyl ester
(12.5 mg/kg) and benserazide
(3.25 mg/kg) twice daily for
20 days. On day 21, L-DOPA-
sensitized rats were treated ip
with sarizotan 30 min prior to
administration of L-DOPA
methyl ester and benserazide.
The number of animals per
group was n = 29 for the
combined vehicle treatment
group, n = 12 for the Sar1
group and n = 10 for the Sar5
group. *P \ 0.05 for
comparison with the vehicle
responses on all days combined
Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias 1737
123
Author's personal copy
potential (Carey 1991). In recent years, however, the rel-
evance of rotational behaviour has been called in question
(Castaneda et al. 2005) and alternative methods that
resemble clinical manifestations of LID have been devel-
oped (Lundblad et al. 2002). The AIMs procedure used in
the present study employs discrete behavioural measures,
display face validity with known anti-dyskinetic com-
pounds, and demonstrate consistency throughout treatment
in L-DOPA-primed rats (Lundblad et al. 2002; Bishop et al.
2006).
Recent research suggests that the dopamine D3 receptor
(Bordet et al. 1997; Kostrzewa et al. 2004) and serotonin
5-HT1A receptor (Bibbiani et al. 2001; Iravani et al. 2003;
Bishop et al. 2006) may play a pivotal role in the sensiti-
zation of contraversive cycling and AIMs induced by
repeated L-DOPA administration in the 6-OHDA-lesioned
rat. We pharmacologically characterized the involvement
of the dopamine D3 receptor and the serotonin 5-HT1A
receptor in the anti-dyskinetic action of sarizotan. We
confirmed the potency of sarizotan to block not only
Fig. 2 The effect of intraperitoneal treatment with 3 mg/kg of
PD128907 on contraversive turning and abnormal involuntary
movements in rats which had unilateral 6-OHDA-induced lesions
and were chronically treated with L-DOPA and benserazide. The
effect of 5 mg/kg sarizotan to reduce L-DOPA-induced turning,
locomotive dyskinesia and axial dystonia was not observed after co-
treatment with 3 mg/kg of PD128907 (PD3). The effect of sarizotan
on orolingual dyskinesia and forelimb dyskineasia was not modified
by PD128907, which significantly reduced forelimb dyskinesia on its
own. Rats were treated intraperitoneally (ip) with L-DOPA methyl
ester (12.5 mg/kg) and benserazide (3.25 mg/kg) twice daily for
20 days. On day 21, L-DOPA-sensitized rats were treated 30 min
prior to administration of L-DOPA methyl ester and benserazide ip
with either sarizotan (5 mg/kg, Sar5), the selective D3 agonist
PD128907 (3 mg/kg, PD3), or the combination of these drugs. Data
for vehicle and sarizotan (Sar5) treatment are the same as in Fig. 1
and are included here for comparison. The number of animals per
group was n = 29 for the combined vehicle-treatment, n = 10 for the
PD3 group, n = 10 for the Sar5 group, and n = 9 for the PD3 ? Sar5
group. *P \ 0.05 for comparison with vehicle treatment on all days
combined. #P \ 0.05 for comparison with sarizotan treatment
1738 M. Gerlach et al.
123
Author's personal copy
turning responses (Bibbiani et al. 2001), but also demon-
strated that sarizotan reduces L-DOPA-induced AIMs.
Co-treatment with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist,
WAY100635, blocked the action of sarizotan, confirming
the importance of this receptor subtype in its mechanism of
action. Additionally, co-treatment with the higher dose of
PD128907 blocked at least some of the behavioural effects
of sarizotan, implying a major interaction with the dopa-
mine D3 receptor in the action of sarizotan as well. It
should be noted, however, that treatment with the dopa-
mine D3 antagonist, GR103691, had no effect on its own on
L-DOPA-induced turning behaviour or AIMs, nor did it add
to the effect of sarizotan, findings not directly supporting
an involvement of dopamine D3 receptor stimulation in
LID. There could be a number of reasons for this incon-
sistency. First, the effect of activation of dopamine D3
receptors on AIMs and turning behaviour could simply be
parallel and additive to the action of sarizotan, and not an
integral part of its in vivo pharmacology. Indeed, treatment
with PD128907 tended to induce reductions of some AIMs
on its own (Fig. 2). The second reason why GR103691 did
not have the same effect as sarizotan could be that its dose
was too low and that much higher doses of this antagonist
are needed to induce behavioural effects in combination
with sarizotan or the high dose of PD128907. Finally, the
agonist PD128907—as well as sarizotan—might act as a
competitive dopamine antagonist in the presence of
endogenous dopamine derived from L-DOPA.
There are some inconsistent findings concerning the role
of the dopamine D3 receptor in locomotor activity in nor-
mal rats and LID in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats (see Visanji
et al. 2006). In the intact rodent striatum, D3 receptor
expression is smaller than one percent of that of D1 and D2
receptors (Levesque et al. 1992). However, following
chronic L-DOPA treatment to 6-OHDA-lesioned rats, the
level of striatal D3 expression was demonstrated to rise
above that of vehicle-treated animals (Bordet et al. 1997).
Therefore, it was suggested that stimulation of striatal
dopamine D3 receptor expression may be involved in LID.
This suggestion leads to the idea that reduction of dopa-
mine D3 receptor-mediated neurotransmission may be a
useful strategy to attenuate LID without any effect on the
efficacy of L-DOPA treatment. However, this hypothesis is
inconsistent with findings showing anti-dyskinetic effects
of dopamine D3 receptor agonists (Hsu et al. 2004) and
with data from non-lesioned, normal animals in which D3
receptor stimulation has been shown to attenuate move-
ment (Millan et al. 2004). The first reports on the motor
effects of dopamine D3 receptor function in normal rats,
using the D3 receptor-preferring agonist 7-OH-DPAT,
demonstrated decreased locomotion at low, D3 receptor-
selective doses and enhanced locomotion at higher non-
selective doses (Daly and Waddington 1993; Svensson
et al. 1994). In addition, a D3-receptor-preferring antago-
nist, nafadotride, has been demonstrated to have the
opposite effect (Sautel et al. 1995). D3 knock-out mice
have also been reported to be hyperactive, providing more
support for an inhibitory role of D3 receptor stimulation on
locomotor activity (see for a review Holmes et al. 2004).
A surprising finding was that the interaction of
PD128907 and sarizotan was seen with locomotive dyski-
nesias, axial dystonia and turning behaviour, but not with
orolingual and forelimb dyskinesia (Fig. 2) as well as the
trend of GR103691 to enhance sarizotan’s effect on axial,
Table 2 The effect of treatment with 0.5 or 1.5 mg/kg of GR103691 on contraversive turning or abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) in
rats which had unilateral 6-OHDA-induced lesions and were chronically treated with L-DOPA and benserazide
Treatment (dose mg/kg) Turns Locomotive dyskinesia Axial dystonia Orolingual dyskinesia Forelimb dyskinesia n
Vehicle 746 ± 107 17.4 ± 2.4 17.4 ± 2.7 14.6 ± 2.5 14.3 ± 2.5 29
Sarizotan (5) 242 ± 117* 5.3 ± 2.9* 3.5 ± 2.2* 2.6 ± 1.7* 3.0 ± 1.7* 10
GR103691 (0.5) 510 ± 185 13.6 ± 4.7 13.9 ± 5.0 11.4 ± 5.3 10.8 ± 5.2 10
GR103691 (1.5) 577 ± 150 15.8 ± 3.9 17.4 ± 4.5 14.8 ± 4.4 13.6 ± 4.3 11
GR103691 (1.5)
? sarizotan (5)
152 ± 64* 4.6 ± 2.1* 0.2 ± 0.1* 0.0 ± 0.0* 0.6 ± 0.4* 9
WAY100635 (1) 721 ± 163 18.6 ± 5.2 20.1 ± 5.9 19.0 ± 6.4 18.4 ± 6.4 7
WAY100635 (1)
? sarizotan (5)
647 ± 191 13.3 ± 5.2 14.6 ± 6.0 12.0 ± 5.9 12.0 ± 5.8 7
Treatment with 5 mg/kg sarizotan significantly reduced L-DOPA-induced turning and all AIMs categories on its own and in the presence of co-
treatment with GR103691, which had no effect on its own. In contrast, in the presence of WAY100635, sarizotan did not significantly alter
behaviour. Rats were treated intraperitoneally (ip) with L-DOPA methyl ester (12.5 mg/kg) and benserazide 3.25 mg/kg) twice daily for 20 days.
On day 21, L-DOPA-sensitized rats were treated 30 min prior to administration with L-DOPA methyl ester and benserazide ip with either
sarizotan, the selective D3 antagonist GR103691, the selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist WAY100635, or a combination of these drugs. Data for
vehicle and sarizotan treatment are the same as in Fig. 1 and are included here for comparison
Data are mean ± SEM and were analyzed with ANOVA. * P \ 0.05 for comparison with the vehicle responses on all days combined
Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias 1739
123
Author's personal copy
orolingual and forelimb dyskinesia (Table 2). This sug-
gests that the mechanism responsible for AIMs is not the
same for all categories. This could indicate that different
brain systems are involved in the different AIMs, however,
at this point in time this is speculative.
Consistent with previous studies showing that the effects
of direct or indirect 5-HT1A receptor agonists with anti-
dyskinetic properties were blocked by administration of
selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists (Bibbiani et al. 2001;
Iravani et al. 2003; Bishop et al. 2006), we found that co-
treatment with WAY100635 attenuated the action of sari-
zotan on all AIM categories and on turning behaviour. These
findings confirm that the anti-dyskinetic effects of sarizotan
involve the 5-HT1A receptor. An essential difference
between the interaction of WAY100635 and PD128907 with
sarizotan was that the former drug blocked all AIMs cate-
gories. This again supports that an involvement of 5-HT1A
receptors forms a fundamental component of the effect of
sarizotan; sarizotan reduced cortical and striatal glutamate
concentration in the corticostriatal glutamate pathway via
5-HT1A receptors in the cortex (Antonelli et al. 2005) and
L-DOPA-induced turning behaviour and AIMs in 6-OHDA-
lesioned rats when sarizotan was locally injected in the
subthalamic nucleus (Marin et al. 2009), a structure in basal
ganglia circuitry expressing 5-HT1A receptors. However, the
precise mechanism of this involvement remains further to be
elucidated. Ba et al. (2007) reported that 1 mg/kg 8-OH-
DPAT ip administered reduced L-DOPA-induced motor
complications. On the other hand, a lower dose (0.3 mg/kg)
induced ipsiversive circling in unilateral 8-OHDA-lesioned
rats (Mignon and Wolf 2007), whereas the higher doses
(1–3 mg/kg) gave rise to contraversive circling (Gerber et al.
1998; Matsubara et al. 2006).
In conclusion, chronic L-DOPA administration induced
behavioural responses in unilateral 6-OHDA-lesioned rats
similar to LID in PD patients that could be reduced by
sarizotan. The present experiments clearly identify an
involvement of the dopamine D3 receptor and the 5-HT1A
receptor in these behaviours, however, the results also
show the complexity of these interactions, highlighting
several details of the behavioural responses that can be
selectively and differentially modulated.
Acknowledgment This study was funded by Merck KGaA
(Darmstadt, Germany) without restriction.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict
of interest.
References
Ahlenius S, Henriksson I, Magnusson O, Salmi P (1999) In vivo
intrinsic efficacy of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonists NAD-299,
WAY-100, 635 and (S)-(-)-UH-301 at rat brain monoamine
receptors. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 9:15–19
Antonelli T, Fuxe K, Tomasini MC, Bartoszyk GD, Seyfried CA,
Tanganelli S, Ferraro L (2005) Effects of sarizotan on the
corticostriatal glutamate pathways. Synapse 58:193–199
Arai R, Horiike K, Hasegawa Y (1998) Dopamine-degrading activity
of monoamine oxidase in locus coeruleus and dorsal raphe
nucleus neurons. A histochemical study in the rat. Neurosci Lett
250:41–44
Audinot V, Newman-Tancredi A, Gobert A, Rivet JM, Brocco M,
Lejeune F, Gluck L, Desposte I, Bervoets K, Dekeyne A, Millan
MJ (1998) A comparative in vitro and in vivo pharmacological
characterization of the novel dopamine D-3 receptor antagonists
(?)-S 14297, nafadotride, GR 103, 691 and U 99194. J Pharma-
col Exp Ther 287:187–197
Ba MW, Kong M, Ma GZ, Yang HQ, Lu GQ, Chen SD, Liu ZG
(2007) Cellular and behavioral effects of 5-HT1A receptor
agonist 8-OH-DPAT in a rat model of levodopa-induced motor
complications. Brain Res 1127:177–184
Bara-Jimenez W, Bibbiani F, Morns MJ, Dimitrova T, Sherzai A,
Mouradian MM, Chase T (2005) Effects of serotonin 5-HT1A
agonist in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord
20:932–936
Bartoszyk GD, van Amsterdam C, Greiner HE, Rautenberg W, Russ
H, Seyfried CA (2004) Sarizotan, a serotonin 5-HT1A receptor
agonist and dopamine receptor ligand. 1. Neurochemical profile.
J Neural Transm 111:113–126
Bibbiani F, Oh JD, Chase TN (2001) Serotonin 5-HT1A agonist
improves motor complications in rodent and primate parkinso-
nian models. Neurology 57:1829–1834
Bishop C, Taylor JL, Kuhn DM, Eskow KL, Park JY, Walker PD
(2006) MDMA and fenfluramine reduce L-DOPA-induced dys-
kinesia via indirect 5-HT1A receptor stimulation. Eur J Neurosci
23:2669–2676
Bordet R, Ridray S, Carbon S, Diaz J, Sokoloff P, Schwartz JC (1997)
Induction of dopamine D-3 receptor expression as a mechanism
of behavioral sensitization to levodopa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
94:3363–3367
Brotchie JA (2005) Nondopaminergic mechanisms in levodopa-
induced dyskinesia. Mov Disord 20:919–931
Carey RJ (1991) Chronic L-dopa treatment in the unilateral 6-OHDA
rat-evidence for behavioral sensitization and biochemical toler-
ance. Brain Res 568:205–214
Carta M, Carlsson M, Kirik D, Bjorklund A (2007) Dopamine
released from 5-HT terminals is the cause of L-dopa-induced
dyskinesia in parkinsonian rats. Brain 130:1819–1833
Castaneda E, Fleming S, Paquette MA, Boat K, Moffett J, Stachowiak
EK, Bloom DC, Stachowiak MK (2005) Assessment of recovery
in the hemiparkinson rat: drug-induced rotation is inadequate.
Physiol Behav 84:525–535
Cenci MA (2007) Dopamine dysregulation of movement control
in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia. Trends Neurosci 30:236–
243
Cenci MA, Lee CS, Bjorklund A (1998) L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia
in the rat is associated with striatal overexpression of prodynor-
phin- and glutamic acid decarboxylase mRNA. Eur J Neurosci
10:2694–2706
Cooper DR, Marrel C, Testa B, van de Waterbeemd H, Quinn N,
Jenner P, Marsden CD (1984) L-Dopa methyl ester: a candidate
for chronic systemic delivery of L-Dopa in Parkinson’s disease.
Clin Neuropharmacol 7:89–98
Daly SA, Waddington JL (1993) Behavioral effects of the putative
D-3 dopamine receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT in relation to other
D-2-like agonists. Neuropharmacology 32:509–510
Dekundy A, Lundblad M, Danysz W, Cenci MA (2007) Modulation
of L-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements by
1740 M. Gerlach et al.
123
Author's personal copy
clinically tested compounds: further validation of the rat
dyskinesia model. Behav Brain Res 179:76–89
Dupre KB, Eskow KL, Negron B, Bishop C (2007) The differential
effects of 5-HT(1A) receptor stimulation on dopamine receptor-
mediated abnormal involuntary movements and rotations in the
primed hemiparkinsonian rats. Brain Res 1158:135–143
Eskow KL, Dupre KB, Barnum CJ, Dickinson SO, Park JY, Bishop C
(2009) The role of the dorsal raphe nucleus in the development,
expression, and treatment of L-dopa-induced dyskinesia in
hemiparkinsonian rats. Synapse 63:610–620
Fox SH, Lang AE, Brotchie JM (2006) Translation of nondopamin-
ergic treatments for levodopa-induced dyskinesia from MPTP-
lesioned nonhuman primates to phase Ila clinical studies: keys to
success and roads to failure. Mov Disord 21:1578–1594
Gerber R, Altar CA, Liebman JM (1998) Rotational behaviour
induced by 7-hydroxy-DPAT, a putative 5-HT1A agonist, in
6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat. Psychopharmacology (Berlin)
94:178–182
Gerlach M, Riederer P (1996) Animal models of Parkinson’s disease:
an empirical comparison with the phenomenology of the disease
in man. J Neural Transm 103:987–1041
Gerlach M, van den Buuse M, Blaha C, Bremen D, Riederer P (2004)
Entacapone increases and prolongs the central effects of
L-DOPA in the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat. Naunyn
Schmiedeberg’s Arch Pharmacol 370:388–394
Goetz CG, Damier P, Hicking C, Laska E, Muller T, Olanow CW,
Rascol O, Russ H (2007) Sarizotan as a treatment for dyskinesias
in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
Mov Disord 22:179–186
Gregoire L, Samadi P, Graham J, Bedard PJ, Bartoszyk GD, Di Paolo
T (2009) Low doses of sarizotan reduce dyskinesias and
maintain antiparkinsonian efficacy of L-DOPA in parkinsonian
monkeys. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 15:445–452
Henry B, Crossman AR, Brotchie JM (1999) Effect of repeated
L-DOPA, bromocriptine, or lisuride administration on preproen-
kephalin-A and preproenkephalin-B mRNA levels in the stria-
tum of the 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rat. Exp Neurol
155:204–220
Holmes A, Lachowicz JE, Sibley DR (2004) Phenotypic analysis of
dopamine receptor knockout mice; recent insights into the
functional specificity of dopamine receptor subtypes. Neuro-
pharmacology 47:1117–1134
Hsu A, Togasaki DM, Bezard E, Sokoloff P, Langston JW, Di Monte
DA, Quik M (2004) Effect of the D3 dopamine receptor partial
agonist BP897N-4-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazinyl)butyl-2-
naphthamide on L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine-induced dyskine-
sias and parkinsonism in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther 311:770–777
Iravani MM, Jackson MJ, Kuoppamaki M, Smith LA, Jenner P (2003)
3,4-Methylene-dioxymethamphetamine (ecstasy) inhibits dyski-
nesia expression and normalizes motor activity in 1-methyl-4-
phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-treated primates. J Neurosci
23:9107–9115
Jankovic JJ (2005) Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in Parkinson’s
disease: clinical manifestations. Mov Disord 20(Suppl 11):S11–
S16
Jenner P (2008) Molecular mechanisms of L-DOPA-induced dyski-
nesia. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:665–677
Kostrzewa RM, Kostrzewa JP, Nowak P, Kostrzewa RA, Brus R
(2004) Dopamine D-2 agonist priming in intact and dopamine-
lesioned rats. Neurotoxicol Res 6:457–462
Lane EL, Cheetham SC, Jenner P (2006) Does contraversive circling
in the 6-OHDA-lesioned rat indicate an ability to induce motor
complications as well as therapeutic effects in Parkinson’s
disease? Exp Neurol 197:284–290
Levesque D, Diaz J, Pilon C, Martres MP, Giro B, Souil E, Schott D,
Morgat JL, Schwartz JC, Sokoloff P (1992) Identification,
characterization, and localization of the dopamine-D3 receptor in
rat brain using 7-[3H]hydroxy-N,N-di-normal-propyl-2-aminote-
tralin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:8155–8159
Lundblad M, Andersson M, Winkler C, Kirik D, Wierup N, Cenci
MA (2002) Pharmacological validation of behavioural measures
of akinesia and dyskinesia in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease.
Eur J Neurosci 15:120–132
Lundblad M, Picconi B, Lindgren H, Cenci MA (2004) A model of
L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned
mice: relation to motor and cellular parameters of nigrostriatal
function. Neurobiol Dis 16:110–123
Marin C, Aguilar E, Rodrıgues-Oroz MC, Bartoszyk GD, Obeso JA
(2009) Local administration of sarizotan into the subthalamic
nucleus attenuates levodopa-induced dyskinesias in 6-OHDA-
lesioned rats. Psychopharmacology 204:241–250
Matsubara K, Shimizu K, Suno M, Ogawa K, Awaya T, Yamada T,
Noda T, Satomi M, Ohtaki K, Chiba K, Tasaki Y, Shiono H
(2006) Tandospirone, a 5-HT1A agonist, ameliorates movement
disorder via non-dopaminergic systems in rats with unilateral
6-hydroxydopamine-generated lesions. Brain Res 1112:126–133
Mignon L, Wolf WA (2007) Postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor stimu-
lation increases motor activity in the 6-hydroxydopamine-
lesioned rat: implications for treating Parkinson’s disease.
Psychopharmacology 192:49–59
Millan MJ, Seguin L, Gobert A, Cussac D, Brocco M (2004) The role
of dopamine D-3 compared with D-2 receptors in the control of
locomotor activity: a combined behavioural and neurochemical
analysis with novel, selective antagonists in rats. Psychophar-
macology 174:341–357
Muller T, Russ H (2006) Levodopa, motor fluctuations and dyskinesia
in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Pharmacol 7:1715–1730
Nadjar A, Gerfen CR, Bezard E (2009) Priming for L-dopa-induced
dyskinesia in Parkinson’s disease: a feature inherent to the
treatment or the disease? Prog Neurobiol 87:1–9
Olanow CW, Damier P, Goetz CG, Mueller T, Nutt J, Rascol O,
Serbanescu A, Deckers F, Russ H (2004) Multicenter, open-
label, trial of sarizotan in Parkinson disease patients with
levodopa-induced dyskinesias (the SPLENDID study). Clin
Neuropharmacol 27:58–62
Paxinos G, Watson C (1997) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates,
3rd edn. Academic Press, New York
Pugsley TA, Davis MD, Akunne HC, MacKenzie RG, Shih YH,
Damsma G, Wikstrom H, Whetzel SZ, Georgic LM, Cooke LW,
Demattos SB, Corbin AE, Glase SA, Wise LD, Dijkstra D,
Heffner TG (1995) Neurochemical and functional characteriza-
tion of the preferentially selective dopamine D3 agonist PD
128907. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 275:1355–1366
Rylander D, Parent M, O’Sullivan SS, Dovero S, Lees AJ, Bezard E,
Descarries L, Cenci MA (2010) Maladaptive plasticity of
serotonin axon terminals in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Ann
Neurol 68:619–628
Sautel F, Griffon N, Sokoloff P, Schwartz JC, Launay C, Simon P,
Costentin J, Schoenfelder A, Garrido F, Mann A, Wermuth CG
(1995) Nafadotride, a potent preferential dopamine D-3 receptor
antagonist, activates locomotion in rodents. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther 275:1239–1246
Srinivasan J, Schmidt WJ (2004) The effect of the a2-adrenoreceptor
antagonist idazoxin against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced Parkin-
sonism in rats: multiple facets of action? Naunyn Schmie-
deberg’s Arch Pharmacol 369:629–638
Svensson K, Carlsson A, Waters N (1994) Locomotor inhibition by
the D-3 ligand R-(?)-7-OH-DPAT is independent of changes in
dopamine release. J Neural Transm (Gen Sect) 95:71–74
Role of dopamine D3 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptors in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias 1741
123
Author's personal copy
Ungerstedt U, Arburthnott GW (1970) Quantitative recording of
rotational behaviour in rats after 6-hydroxydopamine lesions
in the nigrostriatal dopamine system. Brain Res 24:
485–493
Visanji NP, Millan MJ, Brotchie JM (2006) Actions at sites other than
D-3 receptors mediate the effects of BP897 on L-DOPA-induced
hyperactivity in monoamine-depleted rats. Exp Neurol
202:85–92
Zeng BY, Iravani MM, Jackson MJ, Rose S, Parent A, Jenner P
(2010) Morphological changes in serotoninergic neurites in the
striatum and globus pallidus in levodopa primed MPTP treated
common marmosets with dyskinesia. Neurobiol Dis 40:599–607
1742 M. Gerlach et al.
123
Author's personal copy