The Effect of Temper Condition and Feeding Speed on ... - MDPI
Performance of high strength AlZnMg(Cu) aluminium alloys after W-temper and warm forming
Transcript of Performance of high strength AlZnMg(Cu) aluminium alloys after W-temper and warm forming
Performance of high strength AlZnMg(Cu) aluminium
alloys after W-temper and warm forming
Paul Oberhauser*, Nikolay Sotirov**, Torsten Grohmann*, Peter Schulz* * AMAG Rolling GmbH / ** AIT Leichtmetallkompetenzzentrum GmbH
TTP 2013 - Tools and Technologies for Processing Ultra High Strength Materials, Graz, 19./20.09.2013
Outline
AMAG (Austria Metall AG)
Forming Processes
Strength Development
Bending and Corrosion Performance
3 3
AMAG value chain
Gießen
Primary
aluminium
Alumina
Sept-Îles, Canada
Ranshofen, Österreich
Petroleum coke,
pitch
Electric power
Scrap,
Primary
aluminium
Rolling slabs
Energy
(gas,
electric power)
Foundry
alloys
Flat rolled
products
4 4
Quality supplier of primary aluminium, foundry alloys
and special flat rolled products of aluminium
Overview
Casting Division Rolling Division Metal Division
Alouette
20 %
Business activities
Leading Producer of aluminium cast- and
flat-rolled products
Metal Division: Interface to raw
material market, stake in the smelter
Alouette
Casting Division: high quality recycling
foundry alloys
Rolling Division: high quality flat-rolled
products
Employees: 1,490 employees1)
Sales
814 mEUR
Key figures 2012
EBITDA
134 mEUR
External shipments
327,800 tons 1) Full time equivalent including leasing personnel, without apprentices, including the
percentage personnel share out of the 20% participation in smelter Alouette (average)
5 5
Motivation Use of aluminium alloys for automotive applications
5xxx AlMg(Mn)
Low to medium strength in soft temper
Good formability, e.g. for door inner
Not suitable for outer body – strain marks
6xxx AlMgSi
Medium to high strength
Standard for outer body in aluminium
Cold forming in T4 naturally aged
Strength nearly doubles during paint bake
7xxx AlZnMg(Cu)
High to ultra high strength
Transfer of adapted aerospace grades to the automotive business
Limited cold forming ability – heat supported forming procedures available
Corrosion performance inferior – coating and certain temper needed
Chance for substitution of press hardened steel – weight specific properties comparable
Application areas for aluminum sheet
Source: ATZ / Audi
6 6
Material Properties High strength 7xxx AlZnMg(Cu) alloys
AlZnMg(Cu) alloy family
Copper and non Cu-containing
Precipitation hardening alloy
MgZn2 (h-phase) respectively Al2CuMg (S-phase) TEM: Hardening particles
Rm [MPa] Rp0,2 [MPa) A50 [%]
AMAG TopForm© UHS
AA7075 (AlZn5,5MgCu)
≥ 540 ≥ 470 ≥ 7
guideline values for temper T6 575 510 12
AA7021 (AlZn5,5Mg1) ≥ 400 ≥ 350 ≥ 7
guideline values for temper T6 425 390 11
AA7020 (AlZn4,5Mg1) ≥ 350 ≥ 280 ≥ 8
guideline values for temper T6 380 335 12
7 7
Motivation Specific strength of 7xxx vs. high strength steels
P. Oberhauser, TTP 2013, 19 September 2013, Graz
(Austria)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Specific Tensile Strength Rm/r
Elo
ng
atio
n [%
]
Advanced High Strength Steels (AHSS)
conventional High Strength Steels
(HSS)
Ultra High Strength Steels (UHSS)
7xxx Aluminium suitable for light-weight
crash-resistant components
- high specific strength
- high residual elongation
Source: voestalpine,
ThyssenKrupp
8 8
Forming Processes Warm forming – Blank in maximum strength T6 heated to about 200°C
Temperature Time Diagram (schematic): Rolling Mill and Press Shop
Warm
Forming
Solution
Heat Treatment
200°C
400°C
minutes hours minutes
20°C
Aluminium Rolling Mill Press
Shop
Quench
(water)
Artificial Ageing
9 9
Forming Processes Forming behaviour AA7075 T6 at room temperature vs. warm forming
Warm forming at 170°C-230°C drastically improves the formability of peak-temper AA7075 T6
Defined mechanical properties after forming process
formed at RT formed at 230°C
AA7075-T6, 2 mm
Sotirov et al., Forming in Car Body Engineering, Bad Nauheim, 26.-27. September 2012
10 10
Forming Processes W-temper forming: Blanks in T4 or T6 receive a solution heat treatment
Temperature time diagram (schematic): Press and Paint Shop
200°C
400°C
minutes minutes
20°C
Press Shop Paint Shop
hours
Solution
Heat Treatment
Quench
(water)
Cold
Forming
5-step
Paint Bake Cycle*
*5-step PB:
15 min/125°C
+25 min/185°C
+15 min/160°C
+15 min/150°C
+30 min/140°C
11 11
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 10 20 30 40 50 60S
tre
ng
th
[MP
a]
Time between quench and tensile testing [min]
Mechanical Properties of AA7075 and AlZnMg in W-Temper5 min solution heat treatment at 485°C, water quench
Rm AA7075 Rm AlZnMg Rp0,2 AA7075 Rp0,2 AlZnMg
Forming Processes Comparison W-temper forming AA7075 vs. AlZnMg
W-Temper Forming test alloy AMAG AlZnMg vs. AlZnMgCu
Solution heat treatment @ ~470°C and water quenching in the press shop
Pressing of the parts within ~ 30 min after quenching (fast natural ageing)
Cu-free test alloy shows similar formability as standard AA5182 in soft temper
AA7075 considerably less formable
AlZnMg AA7075
13 13
Solution heat treatment
400°C 470°C
Experimental Process windows for W-temper forming and warm forming
Forming at
170°C 210°C
Water
Quench
Cooling by
forced air
W-temper forming
Water
Quench
Cooling by
forced air
AA7075 T6 , AlZnMg T79 AA7075 T6, AlZnMg T4
Forming at RT
(3 min after quench)
Warm forming
Sheets, 2 mm
16 16
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
TopForm UHS T6 (as
delivered)
Warmforming Topform UHS
170°C / WQ
Warmforming Topform UHS
170°C / AQ
Warmforming Topform UHS
210°C / WQ
AlZnMg T79 (as delivered)
Warmforming AlZnMg 170°C
/ WQ
Warmforming AlZnMg 170°C
/ AQ
Str
en
gth
[M
Pa
]
Strength of AMAG Topform UHS vs. AlZnMg after warm forming
Rp0,2
Rm
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
TopForm UHS T6 (as
delivered)
Topform UHS 170°C /
WQ + PB
Topform UHS 170°C /
AQ + PB
Topform UHS 210°C /
WQ + PB
Topform UHS 210°C /
AQ + PB
7921 T79 (as
delivered)
AlZnMg 170°C / WQ
+ PB
AlZnMg 170°C / AQ
+ PB
Str
en
gth
[M
Pa
]
Strength of AMAG Topform UHS vs. AlZnMg after warm forming and 5-step Paint Bake
Rp0,2 + PB
Rm + PB
Strength Development Warm forming – strength development
After warm forming at 170°C, both alloys moderately loose strength during 5-step paint bake cycle
Warm forming at >200°C enables re-aging during paint bake steps (RRA-response)
Stable properties, independent of water quench or cooling by air ventilation after warm forming
TopForm UHS AlZnMg TopForm UHS AlZnMg
+ Paintbake
19 19
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
W-Temper AA7075
470°C / WQ
W-Temper AA7075
470°C / AQ
W-Temper AA7075
400°C / WQ
W-Temper AA7075
400°C / AQ
W-Temper AlZnMg
470°C / WQ
W-Temper AlZnMg
470°C / AQ
W-Temper AlZnMg
400°C / WQ
W-Temper AlZnMg
400°C / AQ
Str
en
gth
[M
Pa
]
Strength of AA7075 vs. AlZnMg after W-temper forming and RT storage
Rp0,2
Rm
Strength Development W-temper forming – strength development
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
AA7075 470°C / WQ
+ PB
AA7075 470°C / AQ +
PB
AA7075 400°C / WQ
+ PB
AA7075 400°C / AQ +
PB
AlZnMg 470°C / WQ
+ PB
AlZnMg 470°C / AQ +
PB
AlZnMg 400°C / WQ
+ PB
AlZnMg 400°C / AQ +
PBS
tre
ng
th [M
Pa
]
Strength of AA7075 vs. AlZnMg after W-temper forming and 5-step paint bake cycle
Rp0,2 + PB
Rm + PB
AA7075 has to be solution heat treated in a very close process window
AlZnMg very tolerant in terms of SHT temperature and quenching speed
AlZnMg regains strength after 5-step paint bake cycle (“aging response”)
AA7075 AlZnMg AlZnMg AA7075
+ Paintbake
20 20
Strength Development AMAG TopForm© UHS vs. W-Temper AlZnMg: Comparison of strength
Warm Forming at
temperatures <200°C
moderately decreases
strength at 5 step paint
bake cycle (5xPB) due
to overaging
Warm Forming at >200°C
enables re-aging at
5xPB (so called RRA)
W-Temper Forming
benefits from 5xPB
almost independent of
forced air quench (AQ)
or water quench (WQ)
Stable conditions for both
variants after 5xPB
Warm forming of AMAG TopForm© UHS vs. W-Temper Forming of AMAG AlZnMg
TopForm UHS AlZnMg
21 21
Crash Performance Bending test (ISO 7438, PAPP PWT 4101)
Material / forming process Bending angle b
AA7075 W-Temper 120-138
TopForm UHS warm forming 142-153
AlZnMg W-Temper 110-142
AlZnMg warm forming 109-133
b
a
Samples 60 mm x 25 mm from side-wall of “Smiley” part
Bending punch radius 0,4 mm, roll distance 2*a
AlZnMg shows better bending behaviour than AA7075
22 22
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Be
nd
ing
An
gle
b
Yield Strength [MPa]
Bending Angle as a Function of Yield Strength(Bending test after forming, 2 weeks storage and 5-step paint bake simulation)
Bending Angle AA7075
Bending Angle AlZnMg
Crash Performance Bending test
AA7075 W-Temper 400°C
+ 5-step paint bake:
L = 23,1 MS/m
b1= 120°; b2 = 136°
AlZnMg Warm Forming
+ 5-step paint bake:
L = 23,1 MS/m
b1= 109°; b2 = 133°
b1 b2
23 23
Corrosion Performance Stress corrosion cracking: AMAG TopForm© UHS vs. W-Temper AlZnMg
C-Ring and tensile bar
Load 300 MPa
AMAG TopForm© UHS
AA7075 (AlZn5,5MgCu)
AlZnMg
(in development)
Forming & Temper ASTM G47 DIN 50908 ASTM G47 DIN 50908
W-temper
+ 5-step paintbake passed passed failed 2 d failed 1 d
+ 15 h / 150°C passed passed passed failed 3 d
+ 40 h / 150°C passed passed passed passed
Warm forming
+ 5-step paintbake --- passed --- failed 1 d
AMAG TopForm© UHS W-Temper
Material has to withstand
SCC (Stress Corrosion
Cracking) test 30 days in
order to pass
24 24
Corrosion Performance
AlZnMg W-Temper:
Ageing of parts necessary for proper SCC resistance
AMAG TopForm© UHS:
Cu alloy for SCC resistance
Source: Sarkar et al., Metal Trans. A,
Vol. 12, Issue 11, p.1939; New York 1981
Stress corrosion cracking: AMAG TopForm© UHS vs. W-Temper AlZnMg
25 25
Summary
Warm forming
Material heat treatment at rolling mill (peak strength T6, T79)
Forming at about 200°C for short times preserves strength
Final properties with or without 5-step paint bake well defined (overaged)
W-temper forming
Material receives solution heat treatment immediately before forming
Thermal treatment needed after forming in order to reach required strength
levels
Very narrow process window for Cu-containing AA7075
Cu-free AlZnMg needs additional heat treatment to get immune against
stress corrosion cracking