Novel rat models to study primary genital herpes simplex virus-2 infection
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Novel rat models to study primary genital herpes simplex virus-2 infection
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Novel rat models to study primary genital herpes simplex virus-2infection
Karin Onnheim • Maria Ekblad • Staffan Gorander •
Stefan Lange • Eva Jennische • Tomas Bergstrom •
Sheryl Wildt • Jan-Ake Liljeqvist
Received: 3 October 2014 / Accepted: 9 February 2015 / Published online: 21 February 2015
� Springer-Verlag Wien 2015
Abstract In this study we describe that six rat models
(SD, WIST, LEW, BN, F344 and DA) are susceptible to
intravaginal herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) infection after
pre-treatment with progesterone. At a virus dose of
5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2, all rat models were infected pre-
senting anti-HSV-2 antibodies, infectious virus in vaginal
washes, and HSV-2 DNA genome copies in lumbosacral
dorsal root ganglia and the spinal cord. Most of the LEW,
BN, F344, and DA rats succumbed in systemic progressive
symptoms at day 8-14 post infection, but presented no or
mild genital inflammation while SD and WIST rats were
mostly infected asymptomatically. Infected SD rats did not
reactivate HSV-2 spontaneously or after cortisone treat-
ment. In an HSV-2 virus dose reduction study, F344 rats
were shown to be most susceptible. We also investigated
whether an attenuated HSV-1 strain (KOS321) given
intravaginally, could protect from a subsequent HSV-2
infection. All LEW, BN, and F344 rats survived a primary
HSV-1 infection and no neuronal infection was established.
In BN and F344 rats, anti-HSV-1 antibodies were readily
detected while LEW rats were seronegative. In contrast to
naıve LEW, BN, and F344 rats where only 3 of 18 animals
survived 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2, 23 of 25 previously
HSV-1 infected rats survived a challenge with HSV-2. The
described models provide a new approach to investigate
protective effects of anti-viral microbicides and vaccine
candidates, as well as to study asymptomatic primary
genital HSV-2 infection.
Introduction
The species herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) belongs to the
Herpesviridae family, genus Simplexvirus. HSV-2 infects
the genital mucosa and establishes latency into the sensory
lumbosacral dorsal root ganglia (DRG). Frequent reacti-
vation may induce clinical disease with genital lesions or,
more often, asymptomatic shedding of HSV-2 [1, 2]. HSV-
2 is a common sexually transmitted virus and more than
500 million persons are infected globally [3]. A
K. Onnheim � M. Ekblad � S. Gorander � T. Bergstrom �J.-A. Liljeqvist (&)
Section of Virology, Department of Infectious Medicine,
Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of
Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
e-mail: [email protected]
K. Onnheim
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Ekblad
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Gorander
e-mail: [email protected]
T. Bergstrom
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Lange
Section of Bacteriology, Department of Infectious Medicine,
Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University
of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
e-mail: [email protected]
E. Jennische
Department of Medical Biochemistry and Cell Biology,
Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University
of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
e-mail: [email protected]
S. Wildt
Harlan Laboratories, 8520 Allison Pointe Boulevard,
Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46250, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Arch Virol (2015) 160:1153–1161
DOI 10.1007/s00705-015-2365-7
prophylactic vaccine that can reduce the spread of HSV-2
addresses the increased risk for HSV-2 infected individuals
to also acquire an HIV infection [4]. Earlier clinical vac-
cine trials, based on the HSV-2 proteins gB-2 and/or gD-2,
have failed to show protective effects against HSV-2
infection or disease [5, 6]. The clinical studies were initi-
ated after promising results in extensive preclinical eva-
luations using the genital mouse and guinea pig models.
For several years, the genital model of young mice
has been the first alternative to study effects of pro-
phylactic HSV-2 vaccine candidates. Advantages to this
model include low costs of animals and housing, a
variety of inbred and genetic knock-out strains, and a
broad range of immunological reagents. Limitations are
that the murine genital mucosa is, in contrast the female
mucosa, susceptible to HSV-2 infection only in dies-
trous phase. Synchronization of the mucosa therefore
requires progesterone treatment before infection or
challenge [7]. Moreover, the mouse model cannot be
used to study latency and spontaneous reactivation and
genital shedding.
Guinea pigs are frequently used as an alternative
model to evaluate prophylactic and therapeutic HSV-2
vaccine candidates. This model has several advantages as
compared with the mouse model. For example, the gen-
ital mucosa can be infected with HSV-2 without pro-
gesterone treatment, and HSV-2 can establish latency in
lumbosacral DRG, reactivate and induce recurrent dis-
ease, but also shed virus asymptomatically [8]. The gui-
nea pig model is also useful to study the effect of HSV-2
vaccine candidates in already HSV-1 infected animals [9,
10]. This is an advantage as the model recapitulates the
human infection in that HSV-1 often infects early in life
followed by a subsequent HSV-2 infection. The draw-
backs with the model are the scarcity of inbred and
genetically modified animals, and available immunologi-
cal reagents.
Rats, like mice, belong to the Muridae family. In the first
two to three weeks of age, HSV-1 and HSV-2 are equally
virulent after intracranial inoculation, while in adult Spra-
gue Dawley (SD) rats HSV-1 is more virulent than HSV-2
[11]. The susceptibility of HSV-1 induced acute encepha-
litis differs significantly depending on which rat model is
used. For example, Dark Agouti (DA) and Lewis (LEW)
rats develop a lethal CNS disease while the Piebald Virol
Glaxo rat model is resistant after peripheral inoculation of
virus [12, 13]. To our knowledge no information is avail-
able whether laboratory rats are susceptible to genital
HSV-2 infection. We here describe six rat models that are
susceptible to genital HSV-2 infection after progesterone
treatment and that two of the models develop mostly an
asymptomatic primary infection even at a high infective
dose of HSV-2.
Materials and methods
Cells and viruses
African green monkey kidney cells (GMK AH1) were
cultured in Eagle’s minimal essential medium supple-
mented with 2 % calf serum and antibiotics (penicillin and
streptomycin). The HSV-1 KOS321 strain with a defect in
neural spread [14], and the wild type HSV-2 333 strain
were used for intravaginal (i.vag.) infection or challenge.
Rat models of genital infection
Female 6 to 8 weeks old Hsd:Sprague Dawley� SD� (SD),
RccHan:WIST (WIST), LEW/HanHsd (LEW), BN/SsNO-
laHsd (BN), F344/NHsd (F344), and DA/OlaHsd (DA) rats
were purchased from Harlan Laboratories, Inc., Nether-
lands. A rat ‘‘strain’’ includes inbred animals and a rat
‘‘stock’’ includes outbred animals. In this study we use rat
‘‘models’’ which include both inbred and outbred rats. The
susceptibility of the genital mucosa to HSV-2 infection was
initially evaluated without pre-treatment with progesterone
by i.vag. installation with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2. In the
following experiments, a subcutaneous injection of 3 mg
Depo-Provera (Pfizer) was given seven days before infec-
tion/challenge with HSV-1 and/or HSV-2. To define when
maximal replication of virus occurred after i.vag. HSV-2
infection, vaginal washes were collected at different time
points and virus doses in SD, LEW, BN, and F344 rats.
Vaginal secretions were collected by gently washing the
vagina with 100 ll Hank’s medium ten times. This pro-
cedure was repeated once and the washes were pooled in a
total volume of 1 mL medium.
Survival and genital and systemic disease were followed
21 days post infection and graded as described earlier for
mice [15]: healthy (score, 0), genital erythema (score, 1),
moderate genital inflammation with blisters (score, 2),
severe and purulent genital lesions with loss of hair (score,
3), and hind-limb paralysis and/or general bad condition
(score, 4). The rats were anesthetized with isoflurane
(Baxter) for all interventions. The animal studies were
approved by the ethical board in Gothenburg.
Genital HSV-2 infection
HSV-2 was installed i.vag. with 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2 in
50 ll Hank’s medium. Survival and disease progression
were followed, and vaginal washes were collected at day 2
post infection. Blood and lumbosacral DRG and entire
spinal cords were prepared when rats were euthanized due
to severe symptoms at day 8-14 post infection, or for
asymptomatically infected rats, at day 21 post infection
when the scoring was completed. In an HSV-2 virus-dose
1154 K. Onnheim et al.
123
titration study, SD, LEW, BN, and F344 rats were infected
with virus doses with 1 9 102 or 1 9 103 to 1 9 106 PFU
of HSV-2. The outcome was followed and vaginal washes
and blood were collected.
Genital HSV-1 infection followed by a subsequent
HSV-2 infection
One group each of LEW, BN, and F344 rats were infected
i.vag. with 1 9 106 of HSV-1, and another group of ani-
mals were infected i.vag. with 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-1.
Vaginal washes were collected at day 2 post infection and
serum was collected at day 21 after HSV-1 infection for
detection of anti-HSV-1 IgG-antibodies. One month later
the rats were challenged i.vag. with 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-
2. At day 28 after HSV-2 infection, or when animals were
euthanized, blood was collected for detection of anti-HSV-
2 IgG-antibodies. One month after the HSV-2 infection, or
when animals were euthanized, lumbosacral DRG and the
spinal cords were prepared.
Plaque assay
Infectious HSV-1 and HSV-2 (PFU) were estimated in the
vaginal washes by a plaque assay as described earlier [15].
The detection limit was 20 PFU/ml.
Detection of antibodies in serum in ELISA
Sodium deoxycholate-solubilized HSV-1-infected cell
membrane antigen [16] was coated overnight in carbonate
buffer (pH 9.6) on Maxisorp 96 well plates for detection of
HSV-1 or type-common HSV-2 antibodies. Helix pomatia
lectin-purified mgG-2 antigen was used for detection of
type-specific HSV-2 antibodies (17). The antibody titer
was defined as the reciprocal value of the highest serum
dilution giving an optical density (OD) greater than nega-
tive rat sera plus 0.2 OD units. An end-point titer\50 was
considered as negative.
Quantification of HSV-1 and HSV-2 DNA genome
copies in neuronal tissue (qPCR)
HSV DNA was purified from tissue samples using Mag-
naLyser kit, DNA purification kit and Magnapure LC
Robot (Roche) according to manufacturers protocol. The
amount of HSV DNA in the samples was quantified by
Real-time PCR in an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detection
System (Applied Biosystems). Type-discriminating pri-
mers and probes, amplifying a segment of the HSV-1 or
HSV-2 gB gene, are described elsewhere [18]. Standard
curves were based on dilutions of a plasmid containing the
gB gene. The spinal cord homogenates were diluted 1:4 in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before extraction of HSV
DNA due to inhibition of the PCR reaction at high cellular
DNA content. Three lumbosacral ganglia were pooled in
PBS. Calculated from the standard curves and the dilution
factors the detection limits were defined to be 50 HSV-1 or
HSV-2 DNA genome copies per ganglion and 600 copies
per entire spinal cord.
Immunohistochemistry of mucosa and neurons
In total, four SD and four F344 rats were infected i.vag.
with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2 in two separate experiments.
The SD rat model was selected as they mostly presented an
asymptomatic infection, and the F344 rat model as they
mostly presented a symptomatic infection. At day 3 or at
day 6 post infection (two animals of each model per day),
the animals were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane, and
fixed by transcardial perfusion via the left ventricle with
PBS followed by 4 % formaldehyde. The time points were
selected based on the genital mouse model and the
assumption that maximal replication of HSV-2 precedes
detection of HSV-2 antigen in the vagina (day 3 post
infection) and resolution of genital infection is followed by
spread of HSV-2 to lumbosacral DRG and the spinal cord
(day 6 post infection).
At day 3 post infection vaginas were removed, and at
day 6 post infection vaginas and DRG as well as spinal
cords were collected followed by immersion fixation for
24 h. The entire spinal cords including the DRG were
decalcified, using 10 % EDTA in 0.2 M Tris buffer, pH
7.4, for four weeks. After decalcification, 3-4 mm thick
horizontal slices were cut from the lumbosacral and thor-
acic levels. The samples were dehydrated and embedded in
paraffin using a Leica TP1020 Automatic Tissue Processer.
Sections cut at 4 lm were prepared. After high temperature
antigen retrieval, using a 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0, the
sections were incubated separately with anti-HSV-2 immune
serum from antibodies-online.com (ABIN387093). Anti-
rabbit Impress Reagent HRP (Vector laboratories) was
used as conjugate and the immunoreactions were visua-
lized using liquid DAB? substrate (DAKO). Nuclei were
counter-stained with hematoxylin. Finally, the sections
were dehydrated and mounted using DPX (Merck). A Zeiss
Axio Image M1 microscope and AxioVision software was
used for documentation.
Reactivation of HSV-2
To investigate whether HSV-2 can reactivate and shed
virus after a primary genital infection, five SD rats were
infected with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2. Vaginal washes
were analyzed at day 2 post infection and serum was col-
lected at day 21 post infection to establish that the animals
Rat models to study genital HSV-2 infection 1155
123
were infected. After one month, vaginal washes were col-
lected 3 days per week for 4 weeks, in total 12 samples per
rat. After this time-period betamethasone, at a dose of
4 mg/kg, was administrated intra-muscularly in an attempt
to induce reactivation. Vaginal washes were sampled for
another 2 week period where after lumbosacral DRG and
the spinal cords were collected. Vaginal washes were
analyzed for infectious virus (PFU) and for HSV-2 DNA.
The detection limit was 100 HSV-2 DNA genome copies
per vaginal sample (1 mL). Neuronal tissue was analyzed
for HSV-2 DNA.
Statistics
Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test was used for survival data.
The Mann-Whitney Rank Sum test was used to compare
HSV-2 DNA genome copies between different models. P
values of \0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Rats are susceptible to intravaginal HSV-2 infection
after progesterone treatment
Initially we investigated whether genital infection was
possible without hormone treatment. All six rat models
survived an i.vag. installation with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2
and showed no genital or systemic symptoms. No infec-
tious virus was detected in vaginal secretions and no anti-
HSV-2 IgG-antibodies were detected in serum (data not
shown). We conclude that the vaginal mucosa in rats is
only susceptible to HSV-2 infection after progesterone
treatment (Depo-Provera).
To define an optimal time point to detect infectious
HSV-2 in vaginal washes, SD, LEW, BN, and F344 rats
were infected with 1 9 103 to 1 9 106 PFU. Vaginal
secretions were collected at 12 h and daily between day 1
to day 6 post infection. Using the highest virus doses of
1 9 106 or 1 9 105 PFU, the peak titers were detected
between day 1-2 post infection, and using the lower virus
doses of 1 9 104 or 1 9 103 PFU at day 2-3 post infection.
Most vaginal washes were negative at 12 h post infection.
When HSV-2 was detected in the vaginal washes at 12 h
post infection, infectious HSV-2 (PFU) was significantly
lower as compared with day 1 or day 2 post infection
indicating that replicated HSV-2 was measured and not
solely inoculated virus (data not shown). We decided to
collect the vaginal washes at day 2 post infection.
One week after treatment with Depo-Provera, all rat
models were susceptible to i.vag. infection with 5 9 106
PFU of HSV-2, (Table 1). Anti-HSV-2 antibodies in
serum, infectious virus in vaginal washes, and HSV-2 DNA
genome copies in lumbosacral DRG and spinal cord were
detected in all rats. For the SD rats 6 of 8 survived 5 9 106
PFU of HSV-2. Although few animals were investigated,
we observed obvious differences in HSV-2 DNA genome
copies in lumbosacral DRG (D 3.2 9 103) and in the spinal
cord (D 4.1 9 104) between asymptomatic surviving SD
rats as compared with symptomatic non-survivors. For the
WIST rats 4 of 6 survived 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2, for the
LEW rats 1 of 6 survived, for the F344 rats none of the
animals survived, and for the BN and the DA rats 2 of 6
survived (Table 1). For all models, the symptoms of non-
surviving rats were similar and described as follows; no or
a mild genital inflammation (erythema) was visible around
introitus at day 8-10 post infection. In contrast to the
genital mouse model, genital inflammation in the rats did
not develop further into disease scores 2 or 3. There after
the rats developed progressive systemic symptoms such as
ruffled fur, hunched posture, swollen abdomen, and hind-
limb paralysis in some animals (disease score 4). At this
stage of disease, the animals were immediately euthanized.
At autopsy fecal and urine retention were observed as well
as swollen and inflamed appendix. For surviving rats, no
genital or systemic symptoms were observed.
HSV-2 virus-dose titration
To further evaluate the susceptibility after i.vag. HSV-2
infection, SD, LEW, BN, and F344 rats were infected with
virus doses of 1 9 102 or 1 9 103 to 1 9 106 PFU of
HSV-2. The SD rats were mostly infected asymptomati-
cally and 13 of 15 rats survived 1 9 105 or 1 9 106 PFU of
HSV-2 (Fig. 1A). The SD rats presented infectious HSV-2
in vaginal washes and anti-HSV-2 antibodies at the lowest
dose of 1 9 104 PFU (Fig. 1 A-B). For the LEW rat model,
2 of 9 rats survived 1 9 105 or 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2.
These rats presented the highest mean values of PFU/
sample, while low levels of anti-HSV-2 antibodies were
detected. For the BN rat model, 5 of 8 rats survived
1 9 105 or 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2. Infectious virus in
vaginal washes and anti-HSV-2 antibodies were detected at
doses of 1 9 103 to 1 9 106 PFU. The F344 rat model was
most susceptible and could control the infection only when
1 9 102 or 1 9 103 PFU of HSV-2 was given.
Immunohistochemistry of genital mucosa and neurons
after HSV-2 infection
SD rats and F344 rats were infected i.vag. with 1 9 106
PFU of HSV-2 in two separate experiments. Vagina,
lumbosacral DRG and spinal cords were prepared for im-
munohistochemistry at day 3 or day 6 post infection.
Similarly as described for the mouse genital mucosa [7],
the progesterone treatment induced usually a thin (3-7
1156 K. Onnheim et al.
123
layers) stratified epithelium including stratum basale and
stratum spinosum [19]. However, in the SD and F344 rat
models the epithelial cells close to introitus were often
arranged in 20 - 30 cell layers.
In F344 rats, at day 3 post infection in a first experiment,
HSV-2 antigen was detected close to the introitus in fused
epithelial cells localized at the apical cell surface with
spread to the basal cell layers (Fig. 2A). This is in accor-
dance with the vaginal infection in mice where a produc-
tive infection involves the basal cell layers before the
epithelial cells are sloughed off [7, 20]. At day 6 post
infection most of the lesions were resolved (data not
shown). In a second experiment of F344 rats, a more de-
layed infection was observed with sporadic lesions de-
tected at day 3 post infection (data not shown), while
micro-vesicles were detected close to the introitus at day 6
post infection (Fig. 2B-C). The micro-vesicles were
200-300 lm in length and covered by a cornified layer.
Within the micro-vesicles HSV-2 antigen was mostly de-
tected in the apical cell layers while no antigen was ob-
served in the basal cell layers or in the lamina propria.
In both experiments of HSV-2 infected F344 rats, HSV-
2 antigen was detected in a few neurons within ventrally
localized autonomic ganglia (Fig. 2E), and in the small
sensory neurons in lumbosacral DRG (Fig. 2F). Despite
that both the lumbosacral and thoracic segments of the
spinal cords were examined no HSV-2 antigen was
detected.
In SD rats, in a first experiment, no HSV-2 antigen was
visible in the genital mucosa at day 3 or day 6 post in-
fection, although the epithelial cells were swollen with
numerous vacuoles within the epithelial cell layers (data
not shown). In a second experiment, sporadic HSV-2 in-
fected cells were detected at the apical epithelial cell layers
Vagi
nalw
ash
(PFU
/ml)
106
105
104
103
106
105
104
103
106
105
104
103
102
106
105
104
103
102
0200400600800
1000
4000
8000
12000 LewisBNFischer344
SD
Survival
Infectivedose (PFU)
Anti-
HSV-
2Ig
Gtit
er
106
105
104
103
106
105
104
103
106
105
104
103
102
106
105
104
103
102
0100200300400500
2000
4000
6000
Infectivedose (PFU)
6/7 5/5 0/4 4/47/8 3/3 2/5 4/4
2/4 4/5 4/4 1/4 3/7 4/43/4 5/5 0/4 4/4
A
B
Fig. 1 Susceptibility of four rat models after intravaginal HSV-2
infection. Animals were infected with 1 9 102 or 1 9 103 to
1 9 106 PFU. Infectious virus was measured in vaginal washes at
day 2 post infection (PFU/ml), (A). Anti-HSV-2 IgG-antibodies were
measured in serum collected when rats were euthanized at day 8-14
post infection or in surviving rats at day 21 post infection (B). Data
are presented as mean values from two separate experiments. Error
bars represent ± SEM
Table 1 Outcome after intravaginal infection of six rat models with 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2
Rat model Serum IgGa Vaginal wash PFU/mlb Spinal cordc Ganglionc Survival
HSV-2 DNAc
SD 1506 (50-6400) 1567 (20-4540) 4.0 9 108 (NS) 2.0 9 106 (NS) 6/8
9.8 9 103 (S) 6.2 9 102 (S)
WIST 325 (50-800) 1247 (220-4680) 2.6 9 104 3.2 9 103 4/6
LEW 908 (50-3200) 4790 (120-1.4 9 104) 6.2 9 105 3.0 9 104 1/6
BN 4000 (1600-6400) 1784 (40-3960) 1.6 9 107 8.0 9 103 2/6
F344 1942 (50-3200) 348 (80-1100) 9.1 9 106 4.9 9 105 0/6
DA 3467 (1600-6400) 117 (40-220) 2.3 9 105 9.6 9 104 2/6
For the SD rat model, HSV-2 DNA genome copies in lumbosacral DRG and spinal cord were compared between survivors (S) and non-survivors
(NS). Data are from two separate experiments and presented as mean values with ranges within parenthesis for serum IgG and PFU/mla Anti-HSV-2 IgG titer. Serum was collected at day 21 post infection or when animals were euthanizedb PFU in vaginal washes at day 2 post infectionc Spinal cord and lumbosacral DRG were collected at day 21 post infection or when animals were euthanized and analyzed by qPCR
Rat models to study genital HSV-2 infection 1157
123
close to the introitus (Fig. 2D). No HSV-2 antigen was
detected in autonomic ganglia, lumbosacral DRG or spinal
cords.
No reactivation of HSV-2 in SD rats
Five rats were infected i.vag. with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2.
All rats survived without genital or systemic disease. All
animals presented infectious virus in vaginal washes at day
2 post infection and anti-HSV-2 antibodies at day 21 post
infection (data not shown) indicating that the rats were
infected. One month after the primary HSV-2 infection, in
total, 60 vaginal washes were collected during the next four
weeks. There after cortisone treatment was given and 30
additional vaginal washes were collected. All vaginal
washes were negative i.e., no PFU or HSV-2 DNA genome
copies could be detected (data not shown). Ten weeks after
the primary HSV-2 infection the study was terminated, and
the viral loads in lumbosacral DRG and spinal cords were
analyzed with qPCR. Three rats harbored low numbers of
HSV-2 genome copies per ganglion (mean value of 620
HSV-2 DNA genome copies) but were negative in the
spinal cords, one rat harbored 32637 HSV-2 DNA genome
copies per ganglion and 6900 HSV-2 DNA genome copies
in the spinal cord, while one rat was negative in both
lumbosacral DRG and the spinal cord (data not shown).
Genital HSV-1 infection
To evaluate if a genital infection, using an attenuated HSV-
1 strain, could protect against a subsequent HSV-2 infec-
tion, the LEW, BN, and F344 rat models were selected as
most of the animals developed symptoms after an HSV-2
infection. The rats were initially infected i.vag. with
1 9 106 PFU or 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-1. As the results
were similar between the two groups data were combined.
All rats (n = 25) survived and no genital or systemic
symptoms were observed (disease score 0), (Table 2). In 8
of 9 LEW rats, infectious HSV-1 was detected in the
vaginal washes but no anti-HSV-1 IgG antibodies in serum.
In 4 of 8 BN rats, and in 2 of 8 F344 rats, infectious HSV-1
was detected, while all rats presented anti-HSV-1 IgG an-
tibodies in serum. Two months after the HSV-1 infection,
and one month after the subsequent HSV-2 infection,
lumbosacral DRG and entire spinal cords were prepared
and subjected to type-discriminating qPCR. No HSV-1
DNA was detected in lumbosacral DRG or in the spinal
cord (Table 2).
Fig. 2 Immunohistochemical analyses of vaginal epithelial cells,
autonomic ganglia and lumbosacral DRG in F344 and SD rats after
intravaginal infection with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-2. In F344 rats,
HSV-2 infected cells were detected by an immune serum in the apical
layers with spread into the basal cell layers at day 3 post infection (A),
or as micro-vesicles in the apical cell layers close to the introitus
(indicated with an asterix), at day 6 post infection (B) with
enlargement of the vesicle marked with an arrow (C). In SD rats,
sporadic HSV-2 infected epithelial cells, at the apical cell layers, were
only detected at day 6 post infection (D). In F344 rats, HSV-2 antigen
was detected in the neurons in autonomic ganglia (E), and in small
sensory neurons in lumbosacral DRG (F), at day 6 post infection.
Results are from two experiments
1158 K. Onnheim et al.
123
Genital challenge of HSV-1 infected rats with HSV-2
Rats were infected with 1 9 106 PFU of HSV-1 (n = 12)
or 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-1 (n = 13). Data from the two
HSV-1 infected groups were combined. One month after
the HSV-1 infection, rats were challenged i.vag. with
5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2. In contrast to the outcome after
primary HSV-2 infection, where only 3 of 18 naıve LEW,
BN, and F344 rats survived (Table 1), 23 of 25 HSV-1
infected LEW, BN, and F344 rats survived a challenge
with the same virus dose of HSV-2 (Table 2). This dif-
ference which was highly significant (P = \0.0001).
Seven of nine LEW rats developed no genital or sys-
temic disease after challenge with HSV-2, while two rats
succumbed late after infection (at day 19 and at day 21 post
infection). After challenge with HSV-2, the majority of
LEW rats presented both anti-HSV-2 antibodies and in-
fectious HSV-2 in the genital tract. All LEW rats harbored
HSV-2 DNA genome copies in the spinal cord and 7 of 9
rats in lumbosacral DRG, implying that they were infected
in the neuronal tissue. The mean HSV-2 DNA genome
copies in lumbosacral DRG (P = 0.012) and spinal cord
(P = 0.007) were significantly higher in LEW rats as
compared with F344 rats but not as compared with BN rats.
A single BN rat and a single F344 rat presented no HSV-2
in vaginal washes, no anti-HSV-2 antibodies, and no HSV-
2 DNA in lumbosacral DRG and the spinal cord, implying
that HSV-2 infection was not established.
Discussion
In this study we show that six rat models are susceptible to
i.vag. infection with HSV-2. The development of lethal
systemic disease symptoms suggested uncontrolled virus
spread to lumbosacral DRG, to the spinal cord and to au-
tonomic ganglia. We confirmed that HSV-2 DNA genome
copies were detected in lumbosacral DRG and in the spinal
cord when sick animals were euthanized at day 8-14 post
infection. In symptomatic rats, spread of HSV-2 to the
autonomic ganglia with faecal and urine retention most
likely contributed to the lethal outcome. The spread of
HSV-2 to autonomic ganglia has also been described for
BALB/c mice [21], and in guinea pigs, HSV-2 was pro-
posed to reach the spinal cord via infection of autonomic
neurons and not via lumbosacral DRG [22]. In the im-
munohistochemistry experiments HSV-2 antigens were
detected in the peripheral nerve system of F344 rats but not
in the spinal cord. As compared with the mouse model
[21], the symptoms in the rat models develop later and
more slowly after infection. Too early sampling at day 6
post infection could therefore explain the lack of HSV-2
antigen in the spinal cords of F344 rats.
With reservation that a small number of animals were
examined there was no obvious correlation between sur-
vival and the levels of infectious HSV-2 in vaginal washes
or anti-HSV-2 IgG antibodies for any of the models.
Similar lack of correlation between PFU in vaginal washes
and survival has been described earlier in the mouse model
after i.vag. infection with HSV-1 or HSV-2 strains [23, 24].
The susceptibility and outcome for the different rat models
after HSV- 2 infection presented in Table 1 were evaluated
simultaneously while the experiments presented in the
HSV-2 titration study (Fig. 1) were run separately. The
results after i.vag. infection with 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2
(Table 1) are therefore not always comparable with infec-
tion with the lower doses with 1 9 106 to 1 9 102 PFU of
HSV-2 (Fig. 1). In the titration study we observed an
Table 2 Outcome after intravaginal infection of three rat models with 1 9 106 PFU or 5 9 106 PFU of HSV-1 followed by challenge with
5 9 106 PFU of HSV-2 one month later
Rat model Virus Serum IgG Vaginal wash
PFU/mlbSpinal cordc Ganglionc Survival
LEW HSV-1 Nega 2692 (8/9 pos.) Neg Neg 9/9
BN HSV-1 175a 1495 (4/8 pos.) Neg Neg 8/8
F344 HSV-1 880a 20 (2/8 pos.) Neg Neg 8/8
LEW HSV-2 545d (6/9 pos.) 1249 (8/9 pos.) 33648 12955 (7/9 pos.) 7/9
BN HSV-2 132d (4/8 pos.) 296 (5/8 pos.) 4550 (5/8 pos.) 4225 (4/8 pos.) 8/8
F344 HSV-2 88d (5/8 pos.) 90 (4/8 pos.) 1408 (3/8 pos.) 195 (3/8 pos.) 8/8
Data from the two HSV-1 infected groups were combined. When not all animals were positive, the number of positive rats is indicated. Data are
from two separate experiments and presented as mean values including all animalsa Anti-HSV-1 IgG titer. Serum was collected 21 days after HSV-1 infectionb PFU in vaginal washes at day 2 post infectionc Spinal cord and lumbosacral DRG were collected one month after HSV-2 infection or when animals were euthanized and analyzed by qPCRd Anti-HSV-2 IgG titer. Serum was collected 28 days after HSV-2 infection or when sick animals were euthanized
Rat models to study genital HSV-2 infection 1159
123
inverse relation between virus dose and levels of anti-HSV-
2 antibodies in F344 infected rats which could be explained
by the fact that animals given higher virus doses became
sick and euthanized earlier and before antibodies were
elicited.
In the guinea pig model, it has been suggested that the
genital symptoms after a primary HSV-2 infection is de-
pendent on a neural pathway via sensory ganglia [25–27].
The requirement of HSV-1 returning from infected neu-
ronal tissue to induce peripheral lesions in a flank infection
model has also been described in mice [28]. If a similar
mechanism also operates after genital HSV-2 infection in
rats, the lack of genital symptoms in for example, asymp-
tomatically infected SD rats infected with 5 9 106 PFU of
HSV-2 (Table 1) may be explained by low grade of neu-
ronal infection reflected by low HSV-2 DNA genome
copies in lumbosacral DRG. Similarly, the low HSV-2
DNA genome copies in lumbosacral DRG of SD rats 10
weeks after the primary HSV-2 infection, may also explain
that HSV-2 did not reactivate spontaneously or after cor-
tisone treatment. However, although significant levels of
HSV-2 DNA were detected in lumbosacral DRG in
symptomatic and deceased rats in all models (Table 1), the
animals presented no or only mild genital inflammation.
These findings may suggest that a neuronal circuit for de-
velopment of clinical symptoms is of minor importance in
rats, or alternatively, that for example, anterograde trans-
port to the epithelial cells or activation of the local in-
flammatory responses is impaired.
The majority of primary genital HSV-1 or HSV-2 in-
fections in humans are asymptomatic presenting no clinical
disease symptoms [1, 29, 30]. As a consequence, it is
difficult to study molecular and immune mechanisms in-
volved in viral-host interactions in the epithelial cells and
spread of virus into the autonomic and sensory neurons.
Using the mouse or guinea pig models, earlier studies have
shown that HSV-2 mutants with inactivation of a specific
viral gene, as for example the thymidine kinase gene, in-
duce mild or no genital symptoms after a primary i.vag.
infection [31, 32]. In the SD and WIST rat models, an
asymptomatic primary infection was observed despite that
a wild type and a fully virulent HSV-2 strain was used for
infection. The SD rat model can therefore be proposed to
explore initial interactions in the asymptomatic genital
infection. The WIST rat model can also be considered but
was not thoroughly characterized in this study.
We also investigated if rats previously infected with
HSV-1 were susceptible to genital HSV-2. An HSV-1
strain which is defect in neuroinvasion was selected to
study protective immunity. Although no neuronal infection
was established, the HSV-1 infected rats were significantly
more protected against a subsequent genital HSV-2
infection as compared with naıve HSV-2 infected rats
(Table 1 and Table 2). In LEW rats local replication of
HSV-1 was readily detected but no anti-HSV-1 IgG-anti-
bodies were elicited. These data suggest that other arms of
the immune system than antibodies were involved in pro-
tection in this model. Although antibodies usually are used
as a reliable marker of infection, seronegative HSV-2 ex-
posed individuals with T cell responses to several HSV-2
antigens have been described earlier [33, 34]. Thus, T cell
responses to cross reactive HSV-1 antigen might be inter-
esting to evaluate in the LEW rat model after a genital
HSV-1 infection. Alternatively, the HSV-1 infection was
cleared by mucosal innate immune responses.
In the BN and F344 rat models anti-HSV IgG-antibodies
were detected in all animals, suggesting that antigen pre-
senting cells in the mucosa migrated to lymph nodes and
presented HSV-2 antigen to naıve B cells. This migration
reasonably requires replication of HSV-2 in the vagina.
However, we were unable to detect infectious HSV-2 in 4
of 8 of BN rats and in 6 of 8 F344 rats, observations which
may be explained by non-optimal sampling of vaginal
washes at day 2 after the HSV-1 infection.
In summary, we have shown that six rat models are
susceptible to genital HSV-2 infection but the outcome
varies between the different models. The models can be
suitable to evaluate prophylactic strategies to decrease the
transmission of HSV-2 and to study primary asymptomatic
infections. Fine mapping of the genetic basis associated
with symptomatic lethal HSV-2 infection (e.g. F344 rat
model) and asymptomatic infection (e.g. SD rat model) is
now possible. In recent years new technology improve-
ments have facilitated the development of transgenic rat
strains. Genetically defined new rat models can contribute
to explore interactions between virus and the host and the
study of specific gene functions [35] after genital HSV-
infection. Future studies can also address if the rat models
can recapitulate important aspects of a human genital HSV-
1 infection followed by an HSV-2 infection. In such
studies, a more neurovirulent HSV-1 strain can preferably
be used for genital infection.
Acknowledgements This work was supported by grants from the
ALF Foundation at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, the Gothenburg
Medical Society (GLS), the Adlerbertska Foundation, the Clas
Groschinsky Foundation, the Medical Research Council and Torsten
Soderbergs Foundation. We thank Carolina Gustafsson for technical
assistance.
Conflict of interest None declared.
Ethical standard This study was carried out in accordance to the
rules stated by the Swedish board of agriculture. All animal ex-
periments were approved by the ethical board in Gothenburg (Dnr
171-2013).
1160 K. Onnheim et al.
123
References
1. Langenberg AG, Corey L, Ashley RL, Leong WP, Straus SE
(1999) A prospective study of new infections with herpes simplex
virus type 1 and type 2. Chiron HSV Vaccine Study Group.
N Engl J Med 341(19):1432–1438
2. Schiffer JT, Corey L (2013) Rapid host immune response and
viral dynamics in herpes simplex virus-2 infection. Nat Med
19(3):280–290
3. Looker KJ, Garnett GP (2005) A systematic review of the epi-
demiology and interaction of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2.
Sex Transm Infect 81(2):103–107
4. Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn JR, Cross PL, Whitworth JA,
Hayes RJ (2006) Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV
acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-
analysis of longitudinal studies. Aids 20(1):73–83
5. Belshe RB, Leone PA, Bernstein DI, Wald A, Levin MJ, Sta-
pleton JT et al (2012) Efficacy results of a trial of a herpes
simplex vaccine. N Engl J Med 366(1):34–43
6. Corey L, Langenberg AG, Ashley R, Sekulovich RE, Izu AE,
Douglas JM Jr et al (1999) Recombinant glycoprotein vaccine for
the prevention of genital HSV-2 infection: two randomized
controlled trials. Chiron HSV Vaccine Study Group. JAMA
282(4):331–340
7. Parr MB, Kepple L, McDermott MR, Drew MD, Bozzola JJ, Parr
EL (1994) A mouse model for studies of mucosal immunity to
vaginal infection by herpes simplex virus type 2. Lab Invest
70(3):369–380
8. Stanberry LR (1995) Herpes simplex virus vaccines as im-
munotherapeutic agents. Trends Microbiol 3(6):244–247
9. Awasthi S, Balliet JW, Flynn JA, Lubinski JM, Shaw CE, Dis-
tefano DJ et al (2014) Protection provided by a herpes simplex
virus 2 (HSV-2) glycoprotein C and D subunit antigen vaccine
against genital HSV-2 infection in HSV-1-seropositive guinea
pigs. J Virol 88(4):2000–2010
10. Hoshino Y, Pesnicak L, Dowdell KC, Burbelo PD, Knipe DM,
Straus SE et al (2009) Protection from herpes simplex virus
(HSV)-2 infection with replication-defective HSV-2 or glyco-
protein D2 vaccines in HSV-1-seropositive and HSV-1-ser-
onegative guinea pigs. J Infect Dis 200(7):1088–1095
11. Bergstrom T, Svennerhom B, Conradi N, Horal P, Vahlne A
(1991) Discrimination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2
cerebral infections in a rat model. Acta Neuropath. 82:395–401
12. Beers DR, Henkel JS, Schaefer DC, Rose JW, Stroop WG (1993)
Neuropathology of herpes simplex virus encephalitis in a rat
seizure model. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 52(3):241–252
13. Bereczky-Veress B, Lidman O, Sabri F, Bednar I, Granath F,
Bergstrom T et al (2008) Host strain-dependent difference in
susceptibility in a rat model of herpes simplex type 1 en-
cephalitis. J Neurovirol 14(2):102–118
14. Wang H, Davido DJ, Morrison LA (2013) HSV-1 strain McKrae
is more neuroinvasive than HSV-1 KOS after corneal or vaginal
inoculation in mice. Virus Res 173(2):436–440
15. Gorander S, Harandi AM, Lindqvist M, Bergstrom T, Liljeqvist
JA (2012) Glycoprotein G of herpes simplex virus 2 as a novel
vaccine antigen for immunity to genital and neurological disease.
J Virol 86(14):7544–7553
16. Jeansson S, Forsgren M, Svennerholm B (1983) Evaluation of
solubilized herpes simplex virus membrane antigen by enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol 18(5):1160–1166
17. Liljeqvist J-A, Trybala E, Svennerholm B, Jeansson S, Sjogren-
Jansson E, Bergstrom T (1998) Localization of type-specific
epitopes of herpes simplex virus type 2 glycoprotein G recog-
nized by human and mouse antibodies. J Gen Virol 79:1215–1224
18. Namvar L, Olofsson S, Bergstrom T, Lindh M (2005) Detection
and typing of Herpes Simplex virus (HSV) in mucocutaneous
samples by TaqMan PCR targeting a gB segment homologous for
HSV types 1 and 2. J Clin Microbiol 43(5):2058–2064
19. Westwood FR (2008) The female rat reproductive cycle: a
practical histological guide to staging. Toxicol Pathol
36(3):375–384
20. Svensson A, Kaim J, Mallard C, Olsson A, Brodin E, Hokfelt T
et al (2005) Neurokinin 1 receptor signaling affects the local
innate immune defense against genital herpes virus infection.
J Immunol 175(10):6802–6811
21. Parr MB, Parr EL (2003) Intravaginal administration of herpes
simplex virus type 2 to mice leads to infection of several neural
and extraneural sites. J Neurovirol 9(6):594–602
22. Ohashi M, Bertke AS, Patel A, Krause PR (2011) Spread of
herpes simplex virus to the spinal cord is independent of spread to
dorsal root ganglia. J Virol 85(6):3030–3032
23. Fleck M, Podlech J, Weise K, Muntefering H, Falke D (1993)
Pathogenesis of HSV-1/2 induced vaginitis/vulvitis of the mouse:
dependence of lesions on genetic properties of the virus and
analysis of pathohistology. Arch Virol 129(1–4):35–51
24. Podlech J, Hengerer F, Fleck M, Eray K, Falke D (1996)
Asymptomatic vaginal herpes simplex virus infections in mice:
virology and pathohistology. Arch Virol 141(2):263–274
25. Ljungdahl A, Kristensson K, Lundberg JM, Lycke E, Svenner-
holm B, Ziegler R (1986) Herpes simplex virus infection in
capsaicin-treated mice. J Neurol Sci 72(2–3):223–230
26. Stanberry LR (1990) Capsaicin interferes with the centrifugal
spread of virus in primary and recurrent genital herpes simplex
virus infections. J Infect Dis 162(1):29–34
27. Stanberry LR, Kern ER, Richards JT, Abbott TM, Overall JC Jr
(1982) Genital herpes in guinea pigs: pathogenesis of the primary
infection and description of recurrent disease. J Infect Dis
146(3):397–404
28. Simmons A, Nash AA (1984) Zosteriform spread of herpes
simplex virus as a model of recrudescence and its use to inves-
tigate the role of immune cells in prevention of recurrent disease.
J Virol 52(3):816–821
29. Fleming DT, McQuillan GM, Johnson RE, Nahmias AJ, Aral SO,
Lee FK et al (1997) Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United
States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med 337(16):1105–1111
30. Bernstein DI, Bellamy AR, Hook EW 3rd, Levin MJ, Wald A,
Ewell MG et al (2013) Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and
antibody response to primary infection with herpes simplex virus
type 1 and type 2 in young women. Clin Infect Dis 56(3):344–351
31. McDermott MR, Smiley JR, Leslie P, Brais J, Rudzroga HE,
Bienenstock J (1984) Immunity in the female genital tract after
intravaginal vaccination of mice with an attenuated strain of
herpes simplex virus type 2. J Virol 51(3):747–753
32. Stanberry LR, Kit S, Myers MG (1985) Thymidine kinase-defi-
cient herpes simplex virus type 2 genital infection in guinea pigs.
J Virol 55(2):322–328
33. Posavad CM, Remington M, Mueller DE, Zhao L, Magaret AS,
Wald A et al (2010) Detailed characterization of T cell responses
to herpes simplex virus-2 in immune seronegative persons. J Im-
munol 184(6):3250–3259
34. Posavad CM, Wald A, Hosken N, Huang ML, Koelle DM,
Ashley RL et al (2003) T cell immunity to herpes simplex viruses
in seronegative subjects: silent infection or acquired immunity?
J Immunol 170(8):4380–4388
35. Fahey JR, Katoh H, Malcolm R, Perez AV (2013) The case for
genetic monitoring of mice and rats used in biomedical research.
Mamm Genome 24(3–4):89–94
Rat models to study genital HSV-2 infection 1161
123