National Grid EIRP Final Presentation

39
By: Katherine Mather, John Musto, Giuliana Brogna, Antonio Cabibi and Christianne Lauria The UK Team

Transcript of National Grid EIRP Final Presentation

By: Katherine Mather, John Musto, Giuliana

Brogna, Antonio Cabibi and Christianne Lauria

The UK Team

Agenda• Introduction• Financial Overview

• Strategy Analysis

• Safety Program• Consulting Group

• Consortium • Conclusion

Who are we?

• Safety • Reliability • Efficiency

“We, at National Grid, will be the foremost international electricity and gas company, delivering unparalleled safety, reliability

and efficiency, vital to the wellbeing of our customers and communities.

We are committed to being an innovative leader in energy management and to

safeguarding our global environment for future generations.”

SWOT Analysis

Dividend Yield

Forecasted Future EPS

Forecasted EPS and DPS

Strategy Analysis• Problems / Opportunities

• Values of National Grid

• Core Competencies

Strategy Analysis

• Alignment– Safety Program Improvements

– Consulting Program

– Consortium• Value Added

Safety Program

• “Return to work” programs

• Incentivized environment for field teams

• Management/Supervisory Participation

• Community• Extended Oversight

The Benefits • Adding Value

– Lower cost– Iceberg Theory

•Direct Costs•Indirect Costs

• Customer Satisfaction

• Increased stakeholder interest and awareness

• Improved PR

Implementation

• Expenses–Software– Marketing– Company time and resources

– Incentives• Goals• Timetable

Safety – Financials

• Expenses– Software– Marketing– Company time and resources

– Incentives • Loss Reduction

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

Company 1Power (Company 1)Power (Company 1)Linear (Company 1)Company 2Logarithmic (Company 2)Logarithmic (Company 2)Power (Company 2)Linear (Company 2)

Length of Program (Years)

Inju

ry C

laim

s ($

)

Zanzibar 2008

China 2011

Chennai City 2011

Chile 2010

Brazil 2009Brazil

2011Chile 2011

India 2012

NG Energy Consulting Group

(NGECG)

The Benefits• Unregulated• Use of internal skills and core competencies

• Increase knowledge of oversea opportunities

• Potential human resource benefits

• Expand internal NG knowledge

• Public Relation benefits

Implementation • £10 Million • 20 People

– 10 Internal– 10 New Hires– Pool of experts

• Marketing – Launch event– Reach out to governments

– Print and Online

India

Brazil

Forecasted Return of Consulting Group

Consortium for Future Energy Efficiency in the UK

General Roundtable/ Communications

Planning

Center for Future Energy Research

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Consortium for

Future Energy Efficiency UK

National Grid

Suppliers

Distributors

Universities Government

Regulator

Consumer Represent.

The Benefits 1.General Round

Table/Communications2.Planning Committee3.The Center for Future Energy

Research4.Alternative Dispute

Resolution Committee

Implementation1.Discussions with

regulator 2.Initial meetings 3.Planning Phase 4.Dedication and

opening of consortium

5.Endowment and board election of the research center

Notes on Cost and Benefits•Consortium Costs

oShared EquallyoEndowment

• Increased percentage contributed to endowment = Increased decision making authority and ownership of patents •Benefits oFinancialoCollaborative

The Big Picture•Safety •Reliability

•Efficiency

Questions?

Thank You!