Lipid segregation and IgE receptor signaling: A decade of progress
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Lipid segregation and IgE receptor signaling: A decade of progress
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bba
Biochimica et Biophysica Act
Review
Lipid segregation and IgE receptor signaling: A decade of progress
David Holowka, Julie A. Gosse, Adam T. Hammond, Xuemei Han, Prabuddha Sengupta,
Norah L. Smith, Alice Wagenknecht-Wiesner, Min Wu, Ryan M. Young, Barbara Baird*
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Baker Laboratory, Ithaca, NY 14853-1301, USA
Received 12 April 2005; received in revised form 11 June 2005; accepted 15 June 2005
Available online 11 July 2005
Abstract
Recent work to characterize the roles of lipid segregation in IgE receptor signaling has revealed a mechanism by which segregation of
liquid ordered regions from disordered regions of the plasma membrane results in protection of the Src family kinase Lyn from inactivating
dephosphorylation by a transmembrane tyrosine phosphatase. Antigen-mediated crosslinking of IgE receptors drives their association with
the liquid ordered regions, commonly called lipid rafts, and this facilitates receptor phosphorylation by active Lyn in the raft environment.
Previous work showed that the membrane skeleton coupled to F-actin regulates stimulated receptor phosphorylation and downstream
signaling processes, and more recent work implicates cytoskeletal interactions with ordered lipid rafts in this regulation. These and other
results provide an emerging view of the complex role of membrane structure in orchestrating signal transduction mediated by immune and
other cell surface receptors.
D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Lipid raft; Immunoreceptor signaling; Tyrosine kinase and phosphatase; Cytoskeleton; Membrane domain
Plasma membrane domains that are implicated in
particular cell functions and depend on physical properties
of lipids have received much attention during the past dozen
years [1]. Chief among these are membrane compartments,
commonly referred to as lipid rafts, that participate in
membrane trafficking and receptor-mediated signaling,
among other essential cellular processes. Lipid rafts were
originally defined in terms of their resistance to solubiliza-
tion by non-ionic detergents such as Triton X-100 (TX-100;
[2]). This property was first demonstrated by Brown and
Rose while investigating differential membrane trafficking
in polarized epithelial cells [3]. They showed that when cells
are lysed under standard conditions with TX-100 and
fractionated on sucrose density gradients, a characteristic
subset of cellular phospholipids, including most sphingo-
myelin derivatives, as well as GPI-linked proteins, are not
solubilized, but rather they float as low density membrane
0167-4889/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2005.06.007
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 607 255 4095; fax: +1 607 255 4137.
E-mail address: [email protected] (B. Baird).
vesicles containing relatively small amounts of cellular
proteins. Subsequent biophysical studies on model mem-
branes [4,5] and plasma membrane vesicles [6,7] or
reconstituted plasma membrane lipids [8] showed that these
lipid rafts also have the properties of a liquid ordered (Lo)
phase, in which cholesterol-dependent lipid packing
increases phospholipid acyl chain order while allowing free
lateral diffusion of membrane components. Mass spectro-
metric analysis of detergent-resistant membranes confirmed
a composition characterized by phospholipids with mostly
saturated fatty acid chains, including sphingomyelin [9].
Detergent insolubility and flotation on density gradients
has served as a valuable correlative tool for identifying lipid
rafts; we use it in this manner in the work described below.
The definition of lipid rafts has been broadened by some
laboratories to include, more generally, low-density mem-
brane fractions that are isolated in the absence of detergents
[10,11]. This alternative method of membrane fractionation
suffers from a lack of discriminating physical criteria for the
putative membrane domains isolated and will not be
considered further in this review. Although useful as a first
a 1746 (2005) 252 – 259
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259 253
approximation, it is clear that the criterion of detergent
insolubility is limited in revealing the true nature of lipid
rafts. Their compositional heterogeneity of lipids and
proteins and their dynamic nature in the living cells requires
that more precise tools be applied collectively to character-
ize these critical membrane compartments as related to the
particular cellular functions that they mediate.
Our studies on IgE receptor (FcERI) signaling in mast
cells pointed to the importance of plasma membrane
domains in these stimulated processes. A number of
different types of experiments have led to two general
conclusions concerning lipid rafts in cells. One is that
segregation of certain proteins in ordered lipid rafts from
other proteins in disordered regions of the plasma mem-
branes serves a fundamental role in orchestrating cell
signaling processes. The second conclusion is that the
membrane-associated cytoskeleton plays a substantial role
in regulating lipid segregation at the plasma membrane of
mammalian cells. These general themes of lipid-mediated
protein segregation and cytoskeletally-regulated lipid seg-
regation will be developed in succeeding paragraphs citing
specific examples from studies in our laboratory and from
other recent literature.
1. Lipid-mediated protein segregation
Despite hundreds of studies documenting the involve-
ment of lipid rafts in signal transduction, very few of these
provide direct evidence for specific role(s) that lipid rafts
play in these processes. A common, misguiding assumption
is that lipid rafts represent a small fraction of the membrane
surface, such that association with lipid rafts would confer
concentration of signaling components. This assumption is
usually based on the relatively low abundance of proteins in
lipid rafts. The assumption is incorrect, as a number of
observations reveal that ordered lipids represent a majority
of the plasma membrane lipids [1]. We recently addressed
this question by measuring fluorescence resonance energy
transfer between carbocyanine lipid probes in the outer
leaflet of the plasma membrane of live RBL cells (Sengupta,
P., Holowka, D. and Baird, B. manuscript in preparation)
and obtained strong evidence for nanoscopic phase separa-
tion between Lo and Ld regions. These results further
indicate that about 65% of the plasma membrane lipids are
in the more ordered phase, consistent with recent electron
spin resonance (ESR) measurements in live cells [12].
Previous measurements of lipid order in plasma membrane
vesicles from RBL cells using fluorescence anisotropy [6]
and ESR [7] indicated that at least 40% of the lipids in these
membranes are in an Lo-like environment.
In earlier studies, we found that ligand-mediated cross-
linking of IgE receptors on RBL mast cells causes their
association with detergent-resistant lipid rafts. This associ-
ation correlates with the initiation of tyrosine phosphoryla-
tion of FcERI and the signaling cascade that emanates from
this initiating event [13,14]. Depletion of cholesterol from
RBL mast cells using methyl h-cyclodextrin results in
selective loss of both crosslinked IgE receptors and Lyn
kinase from lipid rafts in parallel with the loss of Lyn-
mediated phosphorylation of FcERI ITAM sequences in the
h and g subunits of this receptor [14]. Outer leaflet
components, including a ganglioside and a GPI-linked
protein, are not lost from lipid rafts under these conditions.
These results indicate that localization of either Lyn or
crosslinked FcERI or both to detergent-resistant lipid rafts is
necessary for the initiation of tyrosine phosphorylation in
these cells.
These early studies on the role of lipid rafts in FcERI
signaling relied heavily on sensitivity to solubilization by
TX-100 to define lipid raft association. Because of the
possible pitfalls of this single approach, we also evaluated
the sensitivity of interactions between crosslinked IgE
receptors and Lyn to cholesterol depletion with confocal
fluorescence microscopy of intact cells with results that
were parallel to those obtained with sucrose gradients of
TX-100-lysed cells [14]. A limitation of these imaging
experiments is that long-term incubations at cold temper-
atures was required for visualizing the clustered receptors
and coalesced lipid rafts. Nonetheless, close correspondence
of the results from these two independent methods provided
early support for the hypothesis that lipid rafts are integrally
involved in IgE-receptor mediated signaling. As described
below, more recent studies take advantage of new tech-
nologies and microscopy of living cells in real time to probe
these interactions.
To determine whether the lipid raft environment regulates
the activity of Lyn kinase, we took a biochemical approach
and compared the specific activity of Lyn isolated from both
raft (ordered) and non-raft (disordered) regions of the
plasma membrane. Using two different measures of kinase
activity, we found that Lyn kinase from lipid rafts has a 4- to
5-fold higher specific activity than that from disordered
regions of unstimulated mast cells [15]. Interestingly,
stimulation via FcERI was found to cause a time-dependent
decrease in Lyn kinase activity, rather than an increase, and
this decrease has been shown to correlate with a stimulation-
dependent increase in C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation
of Lyn by Csk kinase [16]. We found that the higher specific
activity of Lyn from lipid rafts corresponds to its tyrosine
phosphorylation in the active site loop, which occurs on
<20% of the Lyn kinases in lipid rafts and is undetectable on
Lyn from disordered regions of the plasma membrane [15].
This small percentage of Lyn that is highly active because of
its active site phosphorylation [17], both before and after
stimulation, is also predicted from mathematical modeling
of this experimental system by Wofsy and colleagues [18].
It is interesting to compare the role of lipid rafts in
regulating Lyn kinase to that for the T cell-specific Src-
family kinase, Lck. Rogers and Rose found that Lck is
hyperphosphorylated at its negative regulatory site, Tyr505,
in lipid rafts of unstimulated T cells due to exclusion of the
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259254
positive regulatory tyrosine phosphatase, CD45 [19]. This
results in relatively low activity for Lck in lipid rafts in the
absence of stimulation. Brdicka et al. found that this
negative regulation of Lck in lipid rafts is also promoted
by constituative phosphorylation of the raft-associated
adaptor protein, PAGE/Cbp, which mediates lipid raft
association of Csk [20]. Furthermore, they found that
stimulation via T cell receptors causes dephosphorylation
of PAGE/Cbp and consequent dissociation of Csk, which
results in the activation of Lck in lipid rafts [21]. These
results suggest a more complex regulation of Lck activity in
lipid rafts of unstimulated T cells compared to that for Lyn
in RBL mast cells.
Our experimental results for Lyn in mast cells suggested
that its active site tyrosine is more protected from
dephosphorylation by membrane-associated phosphatases
in a raft environment than Lyn in a disordered membrane
environment. We decided to test this hypothesis using a
CHO fibroblast reconstitution system previously character-
ized by Metzger and colleagues [22,23]. We used CHO cells
with stably expressed FcERI, and we transiently transfected
these with Lyn alone or with Lyn together with a tyrosine
phosphatase. Consistent with previous observations [23], we
found that expression of Lyn by itself in these cells resulted
in a high level of FcERI tyrosine phosphorylation in the
absence of stimulation, and only a small further increase due
to antigen-mediated crosslinking of IgE-FcERI. Correspond-
ingly, we found that Lyn expressed in these cells had high
specific activity due to enhanced phosphorylation at its
active site [24]. We tested the effects of co-expression of
several different tyrosine phosphatases, and we found that
one in particular, protein tyrosine phosphatase a (PTPa),
can control the basal activity of Lyn kinase while allowing
robust stimulation of FcERI. Two other phosphatases tested
had different effects: SHP-1, a cytosolic protein that is
recruited to phosphorylated proteins via its SH2 domain
[25], was very effective at suppressing Lyn kinase activity,
but did not allow stimulated phosphorylation of FcERI.
CD45, a transmembrane phosphatase expressed in many
cells of hematopoietic lineage, had a modest stimulatory
effect on Lyn kinase activity, both before and after
stimulation by antigen, consistent with its predominantly
positive effects in T and B cell signaling [26].
PTPa is a transmembrane phosphatase that is ubiqui-
tously expressed, but its endogenous expression in CHO
cells is less than in other cells, including RBL mast cells
[24]. As for most transmembrane proteins in the plasma
membrane, it is excluded from detergent-resistant lipid rafts.
To test the significance of membrane localization in its
capacity to reconstitute stimulated FcERI phosphorylation in
CHO cells, we constructed a chimeric version of this
phosphatase that is anchored to the plasma membrane via
two saturated fatty acid chains, replacing in this manner its
normal transmembrane sequence. As expected, this palmi-
toyl, myristoyl-anchored phosphatase efficiently associated
with lipid rafts. At levels of functional expression similar to
the transmembrane parent, the lipid-anchored chimera was
equally effective at suppressing the high level of sponta-
neous Lyn kinase activity, but it did not allow antigen-
stimulated FcERI phosphorylation [24].
These results demonstrate that exclusion of a specific
transmembrane phosphatase from ordered lipid raft
domains provides a means by which the raft environment
can protect the cognate kinase from negative regulation by
that phosphatase (Fig. 1A). Because uncrosslinked IgE
receptors reside largely outside of lipid rafts, they are not
effectively phosphorylated by active Lyn within the raft
environment. Crosslinking of these receptors enhances
their association with lipid rafts and thus puts them in
proximity to active Lyn kinase, promoting their phosphor-
ylation and possibly protecting them from dephosphoryla-
tion by the same phosphatases that inactivate Lyn (Fig.
1B). Lipid raft association of crosslinked FcERI is a
dynamic process that is readily reversed by agents such as
monovalent hapten that disrupt crosslinks, [27], and these
manipulations cause a rapid reversal of the phosphorylated
state [28,29]. Undoubtedly, other phosphatases, such as
SHP-1, also contribute to the negative regulation of Lyn
kinase activity in mast cells, and the net result is a
dynamic balance of receptor phosphorylation and dephos-
phorylation that is perturbed in a positive manner when
crosslinking drives the receptors to increased association
with lipid rafts.
The structural basis for crosslink-dependent lipid raft
association of FcERI remains incompletely understood, as
for other structurally related multichain immune recognition
receptors [30]. An earlier study ruled out an essential role
for the h subunit of FcERI in this process and pointed
toward possible roles for transmembrane segments of FcERI
a and/or g [31]. To examine the structural basis for this lipid
raft association and for immunoreceptor signaling, we
expressed a panel of single chain chimeric IgE receptors
containing the extracellular domain from human FcERI a,
the cytoplasmic domain of T cell receptor ~, and six differenttransmembrane sequences. The results were striking: chi-
meric receptors containing transmembrane sequences that
did not enable crosslink-dependent association with lipid
rafts mediated only tiny amounts or no tyrosine phosphor-
ylation and Ca2+ responses, whereas those that exhibited
crosslink-dependent lipid raft association caused significant,
albeit variable, amounts of signaling leading to stimulated
degranulation [32]. For one chimeric receptor, disulfide-
mediated oligomerization was found to enhance the signal-
ing response, and, for another, palmitoylation of a cysteine
residue in its transmembrane sequence was found to be
critical for lipid raft association leading to signal trans-
duction. These results strengthen the paradigm of lipid raft-
dependent signal initiation for multichain immune recog-
nition receptors, and they demonstrate that relatively subtle
changes in lipid raft partitioning can make dramatic differ-
ences in the signaling capacity of immunoreceptors. The
prevailing message from these studies is that Lo/Ld phase
Fig. 1. Graphic representation of protein segregation by lipid rafts that is relevant to IgE receptor signal initiation. (A) Distributions of relevant membrane
components in unstimulated cells. (B) Distributions of relevant components following signal initiation by antigen-mediated IgE receptor crosslinking.
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259 255
separation in biological membranes can serve to segregate
proteins from each other in a manner that facilitates ligand-
stimulated signal transduction.
2. Regulation of lipid segregation by the cytoskeleton
Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) composed of lipid
mixtures designed to simulate the composition of the plasma
membrane outer leaflet have been shown to exhibit large-
scale (micron-sized) Lo/Ld phase separations [8,33,34], and
we recently found that cholera toxin B, a pentameric ligand
for the ganglioside GM1, can drive such phase separations
in GUVs with compositions near a phase boundary [35].
Lipids isolated from plasma membranes [8] or from total
cellular lipids [36] can also undergo large-scale Lo/Ld phase
separations when reconstituted into GUVs. However,
optically resolvable phase separations are not observed in
the plasma membrane of intact cells under most circum-
stances [1,37,38]. An exception to this generalization is the
situation where lipid raft-associated proteins or lipids are
extensively crosslinked to form large patches or caps, often
at lower temperatures to prevent endocytosis and to
suppress other signaling-induced cellular changes such as
membrane ruffling. Under these conditions, various lipid
raft components, defined by detergent resistance, are often
observed to undergo co-redistribution with other crosslinked
lipid raft components [39–42]. Non-raft associated proteins
and lipids show little or no co-redistribution, suggesting the
possibility that a large-scale phase separation occurs.
However, it was found that the actin cytoskeleton also
dramatically co-redistributes with lipid raft components
under these conditions [43–45], suggesting that the
structural basis for this large-scale separation of Lo/Ld
components involves interactions more complex than
simply Lo/Ld phase separation in live cells.
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259256
More recent studies also indicate a role for the
membrane-associated cytoskeleton in the regulation of
lipid raft structure. Kusumi and colleagues use ultrafast
cameras to study single molecule lateral diffusion on live
cells, and they conclude that the membrane skeleton
provides barriers to long-range diffusion of both raft and
non-raft membrane components [46]. Although they detect
little or no difference in the lateral mobilities of raft vs.
non-raft components in the absence of ligand-mediated
crosslinking, they see a more substantial restriction of la-
teral mobility for lipid raft components after crosslinking
[47,48]. This may be related to the earlier reports of actin
cytoskeleton accumulation under large-scale lipid raft
patches described above. Other studies by Kenworthy and
colleagues also found only small differences between the
lateral diffusion of raft and non-raft proteins in the absence
of crosslinking using more conventional fluorescence
photobleaching recovery methods [49]. This is consistent
with expectations from lateral diffusion studies on model
membranes of Lo vs. Ld compositions [8,50], indicating
that ordering of lipids by cholesterol has no dramatic effect
on lateral mobility on the lipid and protein probes tested. In
the cell studies, however, depletion of cholesterol caused
significant alterations in the mobility of both raft and non-
raft proteins, suggesting that perturbation of membrane
composition by this strategy has larger effects on mem-
brane structure. Consistent with this view, Edidin and
colleagues showed that cholesterol depletion substantially
reduces F-actin association with the plasma membrane and,
in parallel, causes increased exposure of phosphatidylino-
sitol 4,5-bisphosphate [51]. These results, taken together,
indicate an integral but complex relationship between
cholesterol-dependent membrane structure and plasma
membrane-cytoskeleton coupling.
Our laboratory employs patterned lipid bilayers contain-
ing a specific ligand for IgE that enables spatially defined
clusters of IgE–receptor complexes on cells at room
temperature and 37 -C. Recent studies revealed a surprising
segregation of inner and outer leaflet lipid raft components
[52]. In this experimental situation, the micron-sized patches
of ligand-clustered receptors stimulate rapid, spatially
localized tyrosine phosphorylation (¨1 min) that is fol-
lowed by a slower recruitment of Lyn kinase (¨10 min) and
other inner leaflet components of lipid rafts (10–30 min).
Under these conditions, PIP2 bound to GFP-PLCy PH does
not co-redistribute with these patterned features, nor do
outer leaflet lipid raft markers, including DiIC16 and FITC-
cholera toxin B bound to ganglioside GM1. Recruitment of
Lyn and other inner leaflet components to the patterned
bilayers is strictly dependent on F-actin polymerization, as it
is prevented by micromolar cytochalasin D. These results
point to complex regulation by the actin cytoskeleton of
lipids and proteins that are organized in rafts. Furthermore,
they demonstrate that inner leaflet raft components can
segregate independently from outer leaflet raft components
in live cells.
The view of an intimate relationship between the actin
cytoskeleton and lipid raft structure in cells is further
strengthened by other approaches. We first showed with
mass spectrometry that antigen stimulation of RBL mast
cells changes the lipid composition of detergent-resistant
lipid rafts [9], and our extended examination revealed that
this change is caused by antigen-stimulated actin depolyme-
rization. We observe an increase in polyunsaturated phos-
pholipids that fractionate as detergent-resistant lipids after
antigen stimulation. This shift can be mimicked by treat-
ment of the RBL mast cells with low concentrations of
cytochalasin D; furthermore, antigen-stimulated changes
can be inhibited by the F-actin stabilizer, jasplakinolide
(Han, X., Smith, N., Holowka, D., McLafferty, F. and Baird,
B. manuscript in preparation). These results indicate that the
composition of Lo domains in live cells is tightly regulated
by the actin cytoskeleton, as small perturbations of this
cytoskeleton dramatically affect the structure and composi-
tion of these domains. They suggest that Lo/Ld phase
separation detected by energy transfer depends on the
membrane skeleton that orchestrates plasma membrane
structure in live cells. Understanding the dynamic organ-
ization of lipids and proteins within rafts that facilitates cell
function and the specific molecular mechanisms that
underlie raft regulation by the cytoskeleton are goals of
ongoing studies in this and other laboratories.
3. Future directions
As summarized above, IgE receptor signaling clearly
involves participation of the plasma membrane, and inves-
tigation of the mechanism has provided a useful platform
from which to observe and understand roles for lipid
segregation in cell function. An important role is lipid-
mediated protein segregation to regulate signal transduction
that is stimulated by an external event, such as antigen
crosslinking of IgE-receptors. Other findings point to a
direct coupling between the actin cytoskeleton and deter-
gent-resistant lipid rafts that is integral to this regulation, but
the molecular bases for the underlying structural organiza-
tion remain to be defined. Outstanding questions include
whether the membrane cytoskeleton facilitates Lo/Ld phase
separation of lipids in the plasma membrane at sub-micron
spatial resolution, and how ligand-mediated receptor clus-
tering might perturb such structural organization at the
nanometer scale that translates to functional consequences at
micron and longer length scales. New and improved
electron microscopy methods are needed to probe nano-
scopic structural organization of both proteins and lipids,
and recent efforts in this regard have provoked new
questions concerning membrane structural organization
and its relationship to signal transduction [53,54].
New ways to perturb membrane structure under con-
trolled conditions are also needed to develop a more
complete understanding of plasma membrane architecture
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259 257
and its dynamic regulation. Increasing the cholesterol
content of biological membranes has been shown to be a
useful strategy in this regard [55], and the use of other
sterols with differing effects on Lo structure holds promise
for future studies in cellular systems [56]. Short chain
ceramides have been shown to disrupt Lo structure in
biological membranes, with consequent perturbations of
certain signal transduction pathways [57]. Long chain
ceramides are natural substitutes for cholesterol in the Lo
phase, and they have the interesting property of restricting
lateral diffusion of proteins and lipids in such Lo environ-
ments [58]. Alteration of phospholipid acyl chain compo-
sition by expression of a sterol desaturase [59,60] pioneers
molecular genetic approaches to perturbation of membrane
structure, which will provide important new directions for
detailed inquiry.
This review has focused on the participation of ordered
membrane domains in signal transduction. Roles for Lo
structure in intracellular membrane trafficking processes,
sometimes related to signaling, are receiving increasing
attention. For example, endosomal vesicles with apparent
large-scale phase separations have been reported [61]. We
found that receptor-stimulated outward trafficking of chol-
era toxin B bound to GM1 in recycling endosomes is strictly
dependent on normal cholesterol content in RBL mast cells
[62]. Other studies have indicated aberrant endocytic
trafficking under conditions of altered cholesterol content
[60,63,64]. The dynamic relationship between the plasma
membrane and internally trafficked membranes, and the role
played by ordered lipid domains in related cell processes, is
an intriguing and complicated problem. Understanding the
structural and mechanistic bases for these processes will
require a combination of multidisciplinary approaches and
further development of new technologies. It is clear from the
studies of the past decade on roles for lipid segregation in
cell function that this is a new frontier in cell biology and
much remains to be learned.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants R01-AI22449
and R01-AI18306 and in part by the Nanobiotechnology
Center (NSF: ECS9876771). We acknowledge the pioneer-
ing work on lipid rafts in our laboratory by Drs. K. A. Field,
L.M. Pierini, E.D. Sheets, E.K. Fridriksson, P.S. Pyenta, and
A. Gidwani. We are grateful to our collaborators at Cornell
University: W.W. Webb, F.W. McLafferty, J.H. Freed, G.W.
Feigenson, H.G. Craighead, and their co-workers.
References
[1] S. Mukherjee, F.R. Maxfield, Membrane domains, Annu. Rev. Cell
Dev. Biol. 20 (2004) 839–866.
[2] K. Simons, E. Ikonen, Functional rafts in cell membranes, Nature 387
(1997) 569–572.
[3] D.A. Brown, J.K. Rose, Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to
glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the
apical cell surface, Cell 68 (1992) 533–544.
[4] D.A. Brown, E. London, Structure and origin of ordered lipid domains
in biological membranes, J. Membr. Biol. 164 (1998) 103–114.
[5] E. London, Insights into lipid raft structure and formation from
experiments in model membranes, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 (2002)
480–486.
[6] A. Gidwani, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Fluorescence anisotropy measure-
ments of lipid order in plasma membranes and lipid rafts from RBL-
2H3 mast cells, Biochemistry 40 (2001) 12422–12429.
[7] M. Ge, A. Gidwani, H.A. Brown, D. Holowka, B. Baird, J.H. Freed,
Ordered and disordered phases coexist in plasma membrane vesicles
of RBL-2H3 mast cells. An ESR study, Biophys. J. 85 (2003)
1278–1288.
[8] C. Dietrich, L.A. Bagatolli, Z.N. Volovyk, N.L. Thompson, M. Levi,
K. Jacobson, E. Gratton, Lipid rafts reconstituted in model mem-
branes, Biophys. J. 80 (2001) 1417–1428.
[9] E.K. Fridriksson, P.A. Shipkova, E.D. Sheets, D. Holowka, B. Baird,
F.W. McLafferty, Quantitative analysis of phospholipids in function-
ally important membrane domains from RBL-2H3 mast cells using
tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry, Biochemistry 38 (1999)
8056–8063.
[10] E.J. Smart, Y.-S. Ying, C. Mineo, R.G.W. Anderson, A detergent-free
method for purifying caveolae membrane from tissue culture cells,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92 (1995) 10104–10108.
[11] L.J. Pike, Lipid rafts: heterogeneity on the high seas, Biochem. J. 378
(2004) 281–292.
[12] M.J. Swamy, L. Ciani, M. Ge, A.K. Smith, D. Holowka, B. Baird, J.H.
Freed, Coexisting domains in the plasma membranes of live cells
characterized by spin label ESR spectroscopy, Biophys. J. (submitted
for publication).
[13] K.A. Field, D. Holowka, B. Baird, FceRI-mediated recruitment
of p53/56lyn to detergent-resistant membrane domains accompanies
cellular signaling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92 (1995) 9201–9205.
[14] E.D. Sheets, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Critical role for cholesterol in
Lyn-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of FceRI and their association
with detergent-resistant membranes, J. Cell Biol. (1999) 877–887.
[15] R.M. Young, D. Holowka, B. Baird, A lipid raft environment enhances
Lyn kinase activity by protecting the active site tyrosine from
dephosphorylation, J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 20746–20752.
[16] P. Tolar, L. Draberova, H. Tolarova, P. Draber, Positive and negative
regulation of Fc epsilon receptor I-mediated signaling events by Lyn
kinase C-terminal tyrosine phosphorylation, Eur. J. Immunol. 34
(2004) 1136–1145.
[17] N. Sotirellis, T.M. Johnson, M.L. Hibbs, I.J. Stanley, E. Stanley, A.R.
Dunn, H.C. Cheng, Autophosphorylation induces autoactivation and a
decrease in the Src homology 2 domain accessibility of the Lyn
protein kinase, J. Biol. Chem. 270 (1995) 29773–29780.
[18] C. Wofsy, B.M. Vonakis, H. Metzger, B. Goldstein, One lyn
molecule is sufficient to initiate phosphorylation of aggregated
high-affinity IgE receptors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96
(1999) 8615–8620.
[19] W. Rogers, J.K. Rose, Exclusion of CD45 inhibits activity of p56lck
associated with glycolipid-enriched membrane domains, J. Cell Biol.
135 (1996) 1515–1523.
[20] T. Brdicka, D. Pavlistova, A. Leo, E. Bruyns, V. Korinek, P.
Angelisova, J. Scherer, A. Shevchenko, I. Hilgert, J. Cerny, K. Drbal,
Y. Kuramitsu, B. Kornacker, V. Horejsi, B. Schraven, Phosphoprotein
associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains (PAG), a
novel ubiquitously expressed transmembrane adaptor protein, binds
the protein tyrosine kinase Csk and is involved in regulation of T cell
activation, J. Exp. Med. 191 (2000) 1591–1604.
[21] K.M. Torgersen, R. Bang, S. Yaqb, H. Abrahamsen, B. Rostad, T.
Mustelin, K. Tasken, Release from tonic inhibition of T cell activation
through transient displacement of C-terminal Src kinase (Csk) from
lipid rafts, J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 29313–29318.
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259258
[22] B.M. Vonakis, H. Chen, H. Haleem-Smith, H. Metzger, The unique
domain as the site on Lyn kinase for its constitutive association with
the high affinity receptor for IgE, J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997)
24072–24080.
[23] C. Torigoe, H. Metzger, Spontaneous phosphorylation of the receptor
with high affinity for IgE in transfected fibroblasts, Biochemistry 40
(2001) 4016–4025.
[24] R.M. Young, X. Zheng, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Reconstitution of
regulated phosphorylation of FcepsilonRI by a lipid raft-excluded
protein-tyrosine phosphatase, J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 1230–1235.
[25] J. Zhang, A.K. Somani, K.A. Siminovitch, Roles of the SHP-1
tyrosine phosphatase in the negative regulation of cell signalling,
Semin. Immunol. 12 (2000) 361–378.
[26] M.L. Hermiston, Z. Xu, A. Weiss, CD45: a critical regulator of
signaling thresholds in immune cells, Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21 (2003)
107–137.
[27] K.A. Field, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Compartmentalized activation of
the high affinity immunoglobulin E receptor within membrane
domains, J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997) 4276–4280.
[28] S.-Y. Mao, H. Metzger, Characterization of protein-tyrosine phospha-
tases that dephosphorylate the high affinity IgE receptor, J. Biol.
Chem. 272 (1997) 14067–14073.
[29] M. Peirce, H. Metzger, Detergent-resistant microdomains offer no
refuge for proteins phosphorylated by the IgE receptor, J. Biol. Chem.
275 (2000) 34976–34982.
[30] M. Dykstra, A. Cherukuri, H.W. Sohn, S.J. Tzeng, S.K. Pierce,
Location is everything: lipid rafts and immune cell signaling, Annu.
Rev. Immunol. 21 (2003) 457–481.
[31] K.A. Field, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Structural aspects of the association
of FcERI with detergent-resistant membranes, J. Biol. Chem. 274
(1999) 1753–1758.
[32] J.A. Gosse, A. Wagenknecht-Wiesner, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Trans-
membrane sequences are determinants of immunoreceptor signaling,
J. of Immunol. (in press).
[33] S.L. Veatch, S.L. Keller, A closer look at the canonical FRaft Mixture_
in model membrane studies, Biophys. J. 84 (2003) 725–726.
[34] T. Baumgart, S.T. Hess, W.W. Webb, Imaging coexisting fluid
domains in biomembrane models coupling curvature and line tension,
Nature 425 (2003) 821–824.
[35] A.T. Hammond, F. Heberle, T. Baumgart, D. Holowka, B. Baird, G.W.
Feigenson, Crosslinking a lipid raft component triggers raft-like
phases in model plasma membranes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
102 (2005) 6305–6320.
[36] T. Baumgart, E. Farkas, S.T. Hess, A.T. Hammond, D. Holowka, B.
Baird, W.W. Webb, Experimental and theoretical analysis of fluid/fluid
domain coexistence, interphase tension and curvature in giant
unilamellar vesicles (GUVs), Biophys. J. 86 (2004) 18a.
[37] S. Munro, Lipid rafts: elusive or illusive? Cell 115 (2003) 377–388.
[38] M. Edidin, The state of lipid rafts: from model membranes to cells,
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32 (2003) 257–283.
[39] J.L. Thomas, D. Holowka, B. Baird, W.W. Webb, Large-scale co-
aggregation of fluorescent lipid probes with cell surface proteins,
J. Cell Biol. 125 (1994) 795–802.
[40] T. Harder, P. Scheiffele, P. Verkade, K. Simons, Lipid domain structure
of the plasma membrane revealed by patching of membrane
components, J. Cell Biol. 141 (1998) 929–942.
[41] P.W. Janes, S.C. Ley, A.I. Magee, Aggregation of lipid rafts
accompanies signaling via the T cell antigen receptor, J. Cell Biol.
147 (1999) 447–461.
[42] P.S. Pyenta, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Cross-correlation analysis of inner-
leaflet-anchored green fluorescent protein co-redistributed with IgE
receptors and outer leaflet lipid raft components, Biophys. J. 80 (2001)
2120–2132.
[43] L. Pierini, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Fc(epsilon)RI-mediated association
of 6-Am beads with RBL-2H3 mast cells results in exclusion of
signaling proteins from the forming phagosome and abrogation of
normal downstream signaling, J. Cell Biol. 134 (1996) 1427–1439.
[44] T. Harder, K. Simons, Clusters of glycolipid and glycosylphosphati-
dylinositol-anchored proteins in lymphoid cells: accumulation of actin
regulated by local tyrosine phosphorylation, Eur. J. Immunol. 29
(1999) 556–562.
[45] D. Holowka, E.D. Sheets, B. Baird, Interactions between Fc(epsi-
lon)RI and lipid raft components are regulated by the actin
cytoskeleton, J. Cell Sci. 113 (2000) 1009–1019.
[46] T. Fujiwara, K. Ritchie, H. Murakoshi, K. Jacobson, A. Kusumi,
Phospholipids undergo hop diffusion in compartmentalized cell
membrane, J. Cell Biol. 157 (2002) 1071–1081.
[47] C. Dietrich, B. Yang, T. Fujiwara, A. Kusumi, K. Jacobson, Relation-
ship of lipid rafts to transient confinement zones detected by single
particle tracking, Biophys. J. 82 (2002) 274–284.
[48] A. Kusumi, H. Ike, C. Nakada, K. Murase, T. Fujiwara, Single-
molecule tracking of membrane molecules: plasma membrane
compartmentalization and dynamic assembly of raft-philic signaling
molecules, Semin. Immunol. 17 (2005) 3–21.
[49] A.K. Kenworthy, B.J. Nichols, C.L. Remmert, G.M. Hendrix, M.
Kumar, J. Zimmerberg, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, Dynamics of putative
raft-associated proteins at the cell surface, J. Cell Biol. 165 (2004)
735–746.
[50] P.F. Fahey, D.E. Koppel, L.S. Barak, D.E. Wolf, E.L. Elson, W.W.
Webb, Lateral diffusion in planar lipid bilayers, Science 195 (1977)
305–306.
[51] J. Kwik, S. Boyle, D. Fooksman, L. Margolis, M.P. Sheetz, M. Edidin,
Membrane cholesterol, lateral mobility, and the phosphatidylinositol
4,5-bisphosphate-dependent organization of cell actin, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 (2003) 13964–13969.
[52] M. Wu, D. Holowka, H.G. Craighead, B. Baird, Visualization of
plasma membrane compartmentalization with patterned lipid bilayers,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 13798–13803.
[53] B. Rotblat, I.A. Prior, C. Muncke, R.G. Parton, Y. Kloog, Y.I. Henis,
J.F. Hancock, Three separable domains regulate GTP-dependent
association of H-ras with the plasma membrane, Mol. Cell. Biol. 24
(2004) 6799–6810.
[54] B.S. Wilson, S.L. Steinberg, K. Liederman, J.R. Pfeiffer, Z.
Surviladze, J. Zhang, L.E. Samelson, L.H. Yang, P.G. Kotula, J.M.
Oliver, Markers for detergent-resistant lipid rafts occupy distinct and
dynamic domains in native membranes, Mol. Biol. Cell 15 (2004)
2580–2592.
[55] Y. Li, M. Ge, L. Ciani, G. Kuriakose, E.J. Westover, M. Dura, D.F.
Covey, J.H. Freed, F.R. Maxfield, J. Lytton, I. Tabas, Enrichment of
endoplasmic reticulum with cholesterol inhibits sarcoplasmic-endo-
plasmic reticulum calcium ATPase-2b activity in parallel with
increased order of membrane lipids: implications for depletion of
endoplasmic reticulum calcium stores and apoptosis in cholesterol-
loaded macrophages, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 37030–37039.
[56] J. Wang, Megha, E. London, Relationship between sterol/steroid
structure and participation in ordered lipid domains (lipid rafts):
implications for lipid raft structure and function, Biochemistry 43
(2004) 1010–1018.
[57] A. Gidwani, H.A. Brown, D. Holowka, B. Baird, Disruption of lipid
order by short-chain ceramides correlates with inhibition of phospho-
lipase D and downstream signaling by FcepsilonRI, J. Cell Sci. 116
(2003) 3177–3187.
[58] Megha, E. London, Ceramide selectively displaces cholesterol from
ordered lipid domains (rafts): implications for lipid raft structure and
function, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 9997–10004.
[59] Y. Sun, M. Hao, Y. Luo, C.P. Liang, D.L. Silver, C. Cheng, F.R.
Maxfield, A.R. Tall, Stearoyl-CoA desaturase inhibits ATP-binding
cassette transporter A1-mediated cholesterol efflux and modulates
membrane domain structure, J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003) 5813–5820.
[60] M. Hao, S. Mukherjee, Y. Sun, F.R. Maxfield, Effects of cholesterol
depletion and increased lipid unsaturation on the properties of
endocytic membranes, J. Biol. Chem. 279 (2004) 14171–14178.
[61] S. Pfeffer, Membrane domains in the secretory and endocytic
pathways, Cell 112 (2003) 507–517.
D. Holowka et al. / Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1746 (2005) 252–259 259
[62] R.M. Naal, E.P. Holowka, B. Baird, D. Holowka, Antigen-stimulated
trafficking from the recycling compartment to the plasma membrane in
RBL mast cells, Traffic 4 (2003) 190–200.
[63] S.K. Rodal, G. Skretting, O. Garred, F. Vilhardt, B. van Deurs, K.
Sandvig, Extraction of cholesterol with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin
perturbs formation of clathrin-coated endocytic vesicles, Mol. Biol.
Cell 10 (1999) 961–974.
[64] A. Subtil, I. Gaidarov, K. Kobylarz, M.A. Lampson, J.H. Keen, T.E.
McGraw, Acute cholesterol depletion inhibits clathrin-coated pit
budding, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 6775–6780.