Blunt atrial transseptal puncture using excimer laser in swine
Isolation and characterization of Malassezia spp. in healthy swine of different breeds
Transcript of Isolation and characterization of Malassezia spp. in healthy swine of different breeds
Accepted Manuscript
Title: Isolation and characterization of Malassezia spp. inhealthy swine of different breeds
Authors: S. Nardoni, V. Merildi, S. Frangioni, G. Ariti, R.Verin, P. Vannucci, F. Mancianti
PII: S0378-1135(09)00355-1DOI: doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.033Reference: VETMIC 4525
To appear in: VETMIC
Received date: 2-4-2009Revised date: 8-7-2009Accepted date: 31-7-2009
Please cite this article as: Nardoni, S., Merildi, V., Frangioni, S., Ariti, G.,Verin, R., Vannucci, P., Mancianti, F., Isolation and characterization of Malasseziaspp. in healthy swine of different breeds, Veterinary Microbiology (2008),doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.033
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofbefore it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production processerrors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers thatapply to the journal pertain.
Page 1 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Isolation and characterization of Malassezia spp. in healthy swine of 1
different breeds2
3
Nardoni S., Merildi V., Frangioni S., Ariti G., Verin R., Vannucci P*, Mancianti F.4
5
6
7
Dipartimento di Patologia Animale, Profilassi ed Igiene degli Alimenti Università di Pisa8
*Practitioner, Firenze, Italy9
10
11
12
Corresponding Author:13
Dr Simona Nardoni14
Dipartimento di Patologia Animale, Profilassi ed Igiene degli Alimenti 15
Viale delle Piagge, 216
56100 Pisa 17
18
Telephone number: 0039050 2216952; 19
Fax number: 0039050 221694120
E-mail address: [email protected]
22
Manuscript
Page 2 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Abstract 23
Malassezia spp. genus is represented by several lipophilic yeasts, normally present on the skin 24
of many warm-blooded vertebrates, including man. Swine are one of the less investigated 25
animal species. The aim of the present work was to study the occurrence of Malassezia spp. in 26
the external ear canal of 408 healthy swine of different breeds, under different breeding 27
conditions. For this purpose N. 185 free ranging wild boars, N. 107 large size pigs and 116 28
Cinta Senese breed were selected. Animals were of both genders, with age ranging from 8 29
months to 4 years. The subjects were culturally and molecularly checked for Malassezia spp. 30
Ninety-two out of 408 animals scored positive for Malassezia yeasts (22.5%). M. 31
pachydermatis, M. sympodialis and M. furfur were recognized. M. pachydermatis was the sole 32
species isolated from wild boars (12.9%), Cinta Senese (20.7%) and juvenile large size pigs 33
(13.6%); 88% of large size breeds adult subjects scored positive for M. sympodialis (63.6%) 34
and M. furfur (22.7%), respectively. The study focus on scarcely investigated 35
epidemiological aspects of Malassezia spp. in this animal species. 36
37
38
Keywords: Malassezia spp.; swine; PCR; culture; external ear canal.39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Page 3 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Introduction48
Malassezia genus encounters lipophilic yeasts, normally present on the skin of many warm-49
blooded vertebrates. Based on morphological, ultrastructural, physiological, and genetic 50
features, 7 species were assigned to the genus in the 90ties (Guého et al., 1996; Guillot and 51
Guého, 1995), Malassezia pachydermatis, the only non lipid-dependent species, and the six 52
lipid-dependent species Malassezia furfur, Malassezia globosa, Malassezia obtusa, 53
Malassezia restricta, Malassezia slooffiae and Malassezia sympodialis. Further lipid-54
dependent species, namely Malassezia dermatis (Sugita et al., 2002) Malassezia japonica55
(Sugita et al., 2003), Malassezia nana (Hirai et al., 2004), Malassezia yamatoensis (Sugita et 56
al., 2004), Malassezia equina and Malassezia caprae (Cabañes et al., 2007) were then 57
described. These fungi have a role in otitis externa and seborrhoeic dermatitis of animals, 58
mainly carnivores, as well as in pityriasis versicolor, seborrhoeic dermatitis, atopic dermatitis 59
and folliculitis of man. In humans, M. pachydermatis was the responsible agent of infection 60
both in immunocompetent (Ming Fan et al., 2006), and in immunocompromised subjects 61
(Midgley, 2000); lipid-dependent species alone or variously associated among them or with62
M. pachydermatis are described in domestic animals (Crespo et al., 2002a; Crespo et al., 63
2002b; Nardoni et al., 2004). 64
Swine seem to be one of the less investigated animal species. Some reports prior to the 65
description of the new species demonstrated the occurrence of Malassezia spp. on swine skin 66
(Gustafson, 1959; Gustafson, 1960; Dufait, 1985; Kuttin and Glas, 1985; Guillot et al., 1994) 67
with a marked predominance of lipid-dependent yeasts. Garau et al. (2005), identified M. 68
sympodialis and M. slooffiae from 73% of ear canals in dermatologically healthy animals. To 69
the best of our knowledge, there are no reports about the presence of Malassezia spp., related 70
to breed and management in this animal species. Aim of the present work was to investigate 71
Page 4 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
the occurrence of Malassezia spp. in the external ear canal of different swine breeds, under 72
different breeding conditions.73
74
Materials and methods 75
External ear canals from 408 healthy swine were culturally and molecularly checked for 76
Malassezia spp. The animals were of both genders, with age ranging from 8 months to 4 77
years. Animals aged more than one year were classified as adults. On the basis of breed, the 78
animals were divided into 3 groups: free-ranging wild boars (N. 185), large size swine, such 79
as Landrace, Large White and their crosses (N. 107) and Cinta Senese breed (N. 116). The 80
first group consisted of 68 juvenile and 117 adult wild boars, the second comprehended 64 81
juvenile and 43 adults, while the last one 42 juvenile and 74 adult subjects. Large size pigs 82
were intensively raised in 3 farms (No. 1, 2, 3), as well as Cinta Senese subjects were 83
managed with extensive/outdoor production system in 3 different farms (No. 4, 5, 6).84
Samples were collected by means of sterile cotton tip swabs immediately after killing during 85
wild board hunting season, and at the swine farm in the others. 86
After collection, the specimens were promptly seeded onto Sabouraud Dextrose Agar added 87
with 0.5% of chloramphenicol and cycloheximide (Mycobiotic Agar®, DID, Milano, Italy) 88
and mDixon Agar (3.6% malt extract, 0.6% peptone, 2% desiccated ox-bile, 1% Tween 40, 89
0.2% glycerol, 0.2% oleic acid, 1.2% agar, 0.5% chloramphenicol and 0.5% cycloheximide). 90
The plates were incubated at 30 ° C for 7 days and processed as previously reported (Nardoni 91
et al., 2004). Briefly, lipid-dependent species were morphologically and biochemically 92
identified, as described by Guého et al. (1996). The presence of M. furfur, M. sympodialis and 93
M. slooffiae was proven by the Tween diffusion test, on the basis of their ability to assimilate 94
various polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters. Bond and Anthony (1995) demonstrated the possible 95
lipid dependence of some isolates of M. pachydermatis. Also, the presence of some lipids in 96
Page 5 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
the primary culture from the specimen can allow the growth of M. furfur in lipid-free medium. 97
For these reasons, subsequent transfers were performed to clearly distinguish these two 98
species. The identification of M. furfur was confirmed by using the Cremophor EL (Sigma, St 99
Louis, MO, USA) assimilation test, as reported by Raabe et al. (1998). The splitting of esculin 100
was also performed as additional key to identify both M. furfur and M. sympodialis (Mayser et 101
al., 1997). The lack of catalase activity, which is a specific feature of M. restricta, proved the 102
presence of this species. 103
Morphological and biochemical identification was confirmed by means of a PCR-based 104
technique using restriction enzyme digestion, specific for the discrimination of 11 Malassezia105
species, as described by Mirhendi et al. (2005). In order to achieve pure cultures, for each 106
positive sample 5 colonies were subcultured onto mDixon Agar and stored at -20°C until 107
analysis. The cell walls were mechanically disrupted by freeze-thawing and genomic DNA 108
was extracted and purified according to the DNeasyTM protocol for animal tissue (QIAGEN 109
Inc., Valencia, Ca, USA). The primers selected for this protocol amplify the target part of 26S 110
rDNA, providing a single PCR product of an expected size of 580 bp. The PCR products were 111
subjected to REA using CfoI and BstF51, separately, according to the manufacturer’s 112
instructions (Fermentas International Inc. Burlington, Ontario, Canada). Digested fragments 113
were analyzed by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. 114
Yeast strains with morphological, physiological and molecular characters consistent with M. 115
sympodialis were discriminated from the newly described species M. caprae, and M. equina, 116
amplifying by PCR the variable D1 and D2 regions of the 26S rRNA gene, and the ITS and 117
5.8S rRNA gene. Isolation of DNA, PCR amplification process and DNA sequencing of 118
rRNA genes of the isolates were performed as described by Cabañes et al., (2007). Statistic 119
analysis to evaluate significant differences among breeds and age of pigs was performed by 120
chi square test (P<0.01).121
Page 6 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Results122
Ninety-two out of 408 animals scored positive for Malassezia spp. (22.5%). Three different 123
species were recognized, namely M. pachydermatis, M. sympodialis and M. furfur. All M. 124
pachydermatis isolates grew without lipid supplementation. Some of the lipid-dependent 125
isolates grew scarcely, making difficult conventional identification. However most of the 126
lipid-dependent species showed a strong catalase reaction, scored positive for assimilation of 127
Cremophor EL (M. furfur isolates) and the splitting of esculin (M. sympodialis isolates) and 128
were inhibited from Tween 20 only (M. sympodialis). PCR-RFLP results agreed with cultural 129
findings, and resulted discriminating for isolates with a reduced growing rate, generating 130
fragments identificative for M. pachydermatis, M. sympodialis and M. furfur, respectively. 131
The sequences of the isolates identified as M. sympodialis on a preliminary count, resulted 132
completely identical to M. sympodialis CBS 7222.133
M. pachydermatis was the sole species isolated from both wild boars and Cinta Senese breed, 134
being cultured from 24 animals for each group (12.9% and 20.7%, respectively). The 135
prevalence of recovery for Malassezia spp. in large size animals was 44.1%; M. sympodialis 136
was cultured from 28 subjects (63.6%), M. furfur from 10 (22.7%) and M. pachydermatis137
from 6 (13.6%). All yeasts species were obtained as a pure culture. Table shows the 138
prevalences of Malassezia spp. recovery from different swine breeds, based on farm and age 139
of animals.140
Animals harboring Malassezia species were present in 2 out of 3 intensive breeding farms, 141
while all farms in which Cinta Senese were raised yielded yeasts, with different prevalences. 142
Lipid-dependent species among large size breeds were limited to one farm only, where 88.3% 143
of adults scored positive. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among overall144
prevalence values obtained from wild boars and Cinta Senese on one hand, and large size 145
swine, on the other hand (P> 0.01). 146
Page 7 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Among juvenile wild boars, M. pachydermatis was isolated from 3 subjects only (4.4%), 147
while this same species was recovered from 23/117 adults (19.6%). Thirty-eight out of 43 148
(88%) large size adult animals scored positive for lipid-dependent Malassezia species, while 149
M. pachydermatis was cultured from 6 juvenile subjects only (9.4%). This difference was 150
statistically significant (P<0.01). Sixteen out of 74 Cinta Senese adults (21.6%) were positive 151
for M. pachydermatis, and 8/42 juvenile pigs (19%) harbored this fungal species. For animals 152
belonging to this last breed, different prevalences were not statistically significant. 153
154
Discussion155
Epidemiology of Malassezia species in swine has been scarcely investigated. In literature 156
there is an unique paper dealing with this topic published since the taxonomic revision in 157
1996, while previous reports concern the presence of both lipid-dependent species and M. 158
pachydermatis (formerly Pityrosporum pachydermatis) in the external ear canal of healthy 159
animals (Garau et al., 2005). These authors recovered M. sympodialis and M. slooffiae from 160
73 out of 100 swine ears. In our paper 408 pigs were investigated, with an overall prevalence 161
of 22.5%. The occurrence of Malassezia yeasts appeared to be significantly different 162
depending on the productive aptitude of the animals and, in group of large size and in wild 163
boars on the age, also. To the best of our knowledge there are no reports about the occurrence 164
of Malassezia species in different breeds of Sus scropha.165
The most striking feature was represented by the fact that lipid-dependent fungal species were 166
cultured from adults belonging to large size breeds, only. Among these species, M. 167
sympodialis and M. furfur were identified, in partial contrast to the data published by Garau et 168
al. (2005), who isolated M. sympodialis and M. slooffiae. The presence of lipid dependent 169
Malassezia organisms in this group of animals could suggest that breed and lines used in 170
commercial production as well as diet may represent sources of variation of fat quality not 171
Page 8 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
only on fatty acid profiles of muscle and adipose tissue (Guo et al., 2006), but also on skin 172
composition traits. M. pachydermatis was present in all the 3 groups of investigated animals, 173
but the occurrence of isolation showed remarkable differences. It was the unique species 174
recovered both from wild boars and Cinta Senese breed animals, although a significant higher 175
fungal burden was present in adult wild boars, only. The presence of this yeast species in 176
juvenile large size pigs only was striking, considering that a simultaneous recovery of mixed 177
lipid-dependent and M. pachydermatis was not recorded neither by Garau et al. (2005) nor in 178
the present study. The colonies isolated from each positive animal were representative of an 179
unique Malassezia species as reported by the above cited Authors.180
The number animals checked for each group within different farms didn’t allow to draw 181
general conclusions from a statistic point of view. Nevertheless, different prevalence values 182
were observed among different farms, harbouring animals with similar management systems, 183
suggesting a circulation of fungal organisms among animals of the same piggery, whereas184
they are present.185
PCR-RFLP performed in the present study contextually with phenotypic identification 186
methods was chosen for its ability to discriminate among 11 yeasts species by using 2 187
restriction enzymes (Mihrendi et al., 2005). This identification approach, applied to cultured 188
isolates, appeared to be relatively fast and reliable, showing both a good discriminatory 189
power, and an unambiguous capability to differentiate newly identified species, with the 190
exception of M. sympodialis. To distinguish this last species from related ones, the sequencing 191
and analysis of the D1/D2 26S rRNA gene, and ITS-5.8S rRNA gene is necessary, as 192
demonstrated by Cabañes et al., (2007). 193
Lipid-dependent Malassezia species have been cultured from healthy subjects as stressed by 194
Garau et al. (2005), who appreciate studies dealing with yeast prevalence in skin/ear diseased 195
swine. It is remarkable to considerate that swine is a strictly zootechnic species, characterized 196
Page 9 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
by a relatively short productive life cycle, so a possible occurrence of otitis externa is often 197
neglected by breeders.198
Page 10 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
References199
Bond, R., Anthony, R.,M., 1995. Characterization of markedly lipid-dependent Malassezia 200
pachydermatis isolates from healthy dogs. J Appl Bacteriol. 78: 537-542.201
Cabañes, F. J., Theelen, B., Castellà, G., Boekhout, T., 2007. Two new lipid-dependent 202
Malassezia species from domestic animals. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 1064-1076.203
Crespo, M.,J., Abarca, M.,L., Cabañes, F.,J., 2002a. Occurrence of Malassezia spp. in the 204
external ear canals of dogs and cats with and without otitis externa. Med Mycol. 40: 115-121.205
Crespo, M.,J., Abarca, M.,L., Cabañes, F.,J., 2002b. Occurrence of Malassezia spp. in horses 206
and domestic ruminants. Mycoses. 45: 333–337.207
Dufait, R., 1985, Présence de Malassezia pachydermatis (syn. Pityrosporum canis) sur les 208
poils et les plumes des animaux domestiques. Bull Soc Fr Mycol Méd. 14: 19–22.209
Garau, M., Del Palacio, A., García, J., 2005. Prevalence of Malassezia spp. in healthy pigs. 210
Mycoses. 48: 17-20.211
Guého, E., Midgley, G., Guillot, J., 1996. The genus Malassezia with description of four new 212
species. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek. 69: 337-355.213
Guillot, J., Chermette, R., Guého, E., 1994. Prévalence du genre Malassezia chez les 214
mammifères. J Mycol Med. 4: 72–79.215
Guillot, J., Guého, E., 1995. The diversity of Malassezia yeasts confirmed by rRNA sequence 216
and nuclear comparisons. Antoine van Leeuwenhoek 67: 297-314.217
Guo, Q., Richert, B., T., Burgess, J., R., Webel, D., M., Orr, D., E., Blair, M., Fitzner, G., E., 218
Hall, D., D., Grant, A., L., Gerrard, D. E., 2006. Effects of dietary vitamin E and fat 219
supplementation on pork quality. J Anim Sci. 84: 3089-3099.220
221
Page 11 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Gustafson, B.,A., 1959. Lipophilic yeasts belonging to genus Pityrosporum, found in swine. 222
Acta Path Microbiol Scand. 45: 275–280.223
Gustafson, B.,A., 1960. The occurrence of yeasts belonging to genus Pityrosporum in 224
different kinds of animals. Acta Path Microbiol Scand. 48: 51–55.225
Hirai, A., Kano, R., Makimura, K., Duarte, E.R., Hamdan, J.S., Lachance, M.A., Yamaguchi, 226
H., Hasegawa, A., 2004. Malassezia nana sp. nov., a novel lipid-dependent yeast species 227
isolated from animals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 54: 623-627.228
Kuttin, E.,S., Glas, I., 1985. Mycotic otitis externa in animals. Mykosen 28: 61–65.229
Mayser, P., Haze, P., Papavassilis, C., Pickel, M., Gruender, K., Guého, E., 1997. 230
Differentiation of Malassezia species: selectivity of cremophor EL, castor oil and ricinoleic 231
acid for M. furfur. Br J Dermatol. 137: 208-213.232
Midgley, G., 2000. The lipophilic yeasts: state of the art and prospects. Med Mycol. 38: 9-16.233
Ming Fan, Y.,M., Huang, W.,M., Li, S.,F., Wu, G.,F., Lai, K., Chen, R.,Y., 2006. 234
Granulomatous skin infection caused by Malassezia pachydermatis in a dog owner. Arch 235
Dermatol. 142: 1181-1184. 236
Mirhendi, H., Makimura, K., Zomorodian, K., Yamada, T., Sugita, T., Yamaguchi, H., 2005. 237
A simple PCR-RFLP method for identification and differentiation of 11 Malassezia species. J 238
Microbiol Methods 61: 281-284.239
Nardoni, S., Mancianti, F., Corazza, M., Rum, A., 2004. Occurrence of Malassezia species in 240
healthy and dermatologically diseased dogs. Mycopathologia 157: 383-388.241
Raabe, P., Mayser, P., Weiss, R., 1998. Demonstration of Malassezia furfur and M. 242
sympodialis together with M. pachydermatis in veterinary specimens. Mycoses. 41: 493-500. 243
Sugita, T., Takashima, M., Shinoda, T., Suto, H., Unno, T., Tsuboi, R., Ogawa, H., 244
Nishikawa, A., 2002. New yeast species, Malassezia dermatis, isolated from patients with 245
atopic dermatitis. J Clin Microbiol 40: 1363-1367.246
Page 12 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Sugita, T., Takashima, M., Kodama, M., Tsuboi, R., Nishikawa, A., 2003. Description of a 247
new yeast species, Malassezia japonica, and its detection in patients with atopic dermatitis 248
and healthy subjects. J Clin Microbiol. 41: 4695-4699.249
Sugita, T., Tajima, M., Takashima, M., Amaya, M., Saito, M., Tsuboi, R., Nishikawa, A., 250
2004. A new yeast, Malassezia yamatoensis, isolated from a patient with seborrheic dermatitis 251
and its distribution in patients and healthy subjects. Microbiol Immunol. 48: 579-583. 252
Page 13 of 13
Accep
ted
Man
uscr
ipt
Farm No. N. of animals juvenile adults positive juvenile animals (%) M. pachydermatis positive adult animals (%) M. furfur M. pachydermatis M. sympodialis1 29 29 0 4/29 (13.8%) recovered 0/0 (0%) 0 0 02 54 11 43 2/11 (18.2%) recovered 38/43 (88.4%) 10 0 283 24 24 0 0/24 (0%) not recovered 0/0 (0%) 0 0 0
total 107 64 43 6/64 (9.4%)* 38/43 (88.4%)* 10 0 284 36 4 32 4/4 (100%) recovered 8/32 (25%) 0 8 05 36 2 34 0/2 (0%) not recovered 8/34 (23.5%) 0 8 06 44 36 8 4/36 (11.1%) recovered 0/8 (0%) 0 0 0
total 116 42 74 8/42 (19%) 16/74 (21.6%) 0 16 0
185 68 117 3/68 (4.4%) recovered 23/117 (19.6%) 0 23 0
larg
e br
eeds
§§Ci
nta
Sene
se §
Wild boars§
§ statistically not significant values§§; * statistically significant values
Table - Prevalence and characterization of Malassezia species in function of farms, breed and age of examined animals.
Table