Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin by reinforcement of depolymerized latex rubber
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
0 -
download
0
Transcript of Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin by reinforcement of depolymerized latex rubber
DOI 10.1515/secm-2013-0292 Sci Eng Compos Mater 2014; aop
Mayank Agarwal , Mohamand Arif , Ankita Bisht , Vinay K. Singh * and Sunanda Biswas
Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin by reinforcement of depolymerized latex rubber Abstract: An epoxy resin (EP) matrix has been modi-
fied with depolymerized natural rubber (DNR). The 0.5,
1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt% DNR-filled epoxy were used
for the present investigation. The primary aim of this
development is to scrutinize the mechanical properties
of such cured epoxy filled with DNR. When the rub-
ber content was low, the mechanical strength was low
and the free volume of DNR in epoxy matrix was less.
With the increase in rubber content, the free volume of
rubber in the composite increases and the mechanical
strength increases; however, after a specific weight per-
centage of rubber, if we increase the amount of rubber,
the mechanical strength decreases and the free volume
of rubber in the composite increases quickly, but with
the increase in DNR weight percentage in epoxy matrix,
the hardness decreases. The scanning electron micros-
copy (SEM) results justified the results obtained from
the mechanical tests.
Keywords: depolymerized natural rubber; epoxy resin;
mechanical properties.
*Corresponding author: Vinay K. Singh, College of Technology, G.B.
Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145,
Uttarakhand, India, e-mail: [email protected]
Mayank Agarwal, Mohamand Arif, Ankita Bisht and Sunanda Biswas: College of Technology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture
and Technology, Pantnagar-263 145, Uttarakhand, India
1 Introduction Epoxy resins (EP) are used in a variety of applications
because they are a very important class of thermoset-
ting polymers that exhibit high tensile strength, excel-
lent chemical and corrosion resistance, good thermal
stability, low density and low creep, and reasonable
performance at elevated temperature. Hence, they are
widely used in structural adhesives, surface coatings, and
electrical laminates and as matrix resins for reinforced
composite materials. However, general epoxy systems
usually suffer the shortage of toughness due to the high
levels of cross-linking, which can and usually does result
in brittle behavior. Liquid rubber can be used as a tough-
ing material for EP because it is normally derived from
synthetic rubber. During the polymerization, the rubber
phase separates because it becomes less miscible with
the epoxy matrix, forming a sludge of rubber that is dis-
persed in the EP matrix. Several methods have been pro-
posed to increase the toughness of EP by the addition of
rubber in uncured EP and then controlling the polymeri-
zation reactions in order to restrict the phase separation
[1 – 6] . The rubbery materials that are added to the uncured
epoxy are types of copolymers with variable acrylonitrile
contents. The studies reported that, to modify EP, mostly
modified liquid rubber was used, such as liquid rubber
modified by divinylbenzene (DVB), hydroxyl terminated
butadiene (HTPB), carboxyl terminated butadiene-acry-
lonitrile (CTBN), or isocyanate terminated polybutadi-
ene (NCOPBER) [4, 7 – 9] . However, due to the increasing
awareness of environmental issues, natural latex rubber
has attracted great interest because it is a renewable
resource. In the present study, natural rubber latex is used
as a toughing material for EP. The properties of modified
epoxy are studied by tensile test. The dispersion of rubber
in the matrix of epoxy is verified by the scanning electron
microscopy (SEM) test.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Epoxy resin
The bisphenol A-type EP (CY230) used for this study
was purchased from M/s Petro Araldite Pvt. Ltd.
(Chennai, India). Epoxy (CY230) is widely used in indus-
trial application because of its high strength and good
mechanical adhesiveness. It is also a good solvent and
has good chemical resistance over a wide range of
temperature.
Bereitgestellt von | De Gruyter / TCSAngemeldet | 10.248.254.158
Heruntergeladen am | 01.09.14 10:32
2 M. Agarwal et al.: Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin
2.2 Hardener HY951
The hardener HY951 purchased from M/s Petro Araldite Pvt.
Ltd. was used as a curing agent. In the present investigation,
9 wt% has been used in all materials developed. The weight
percentage of hardener used in the present investigation is
as per the recommendation of Singh and Gope [10]
2.3 Natural rubber latex
Natural rubber latex (NR) was purchased from M/s Allied
Business (Pantnagar, India). It has 60% dry rubber content.
The NR has outstanding flexibility and high mechanical
strength. Moreover, it is a renewable resource, whereas its
synthetic counterparts are mostly manufactured from non-
renewable oil-based resources. Therefore, NR has created
a high level of interest regarding its use and its derivatives.
2.4 Preparation of the material
2.4.1 Depolymerization of NR
Depolymerization means opening the active linkage in the
polymer backbone by the reaction of a reagent with reactive
polar group. Depolymerization can reduce the chain length
of natural rubber. In general, a depolymerized natural
rubber (DNR) can be obtained by mastication, photolysis,
chemical decomposition, or the like of the natural rubber.
Mastication is a method for accelerating reduction in the
molecular weight by breaking the rubber molecular chains
of the raw rubber through a mechanical action and heating
in a roller mill or internal mixer and then adding a peptiz-
ing agent such as a mercaptan [11] . Vitaly and Eduardo [12]
used the photolysis method for breaking the molecular
chains with light energy, that is, ultraviolet light. Another
approach that has been used to reduce the molecular
weight of natural rubber is chemical decomposition. This
method is the degradation of molecular chains by chemical
reagents. In 1996, Tanaka et al. [13] proposed the process for
depolymerizing natural rubber, which comprised adding
a carbonyl compound to natural rubber latex or depro-
teinized natural rubber and then subjecting the resulting
natural rubber or deproteinized natural rubber to air oxida-
tion in the presence of a radical-forming agent. The results
showed that the DNR having a narrow molecular weight
distribution can be obtained at high reaction efficiency.
In the present method, 60% total dry content natural
rubber latex was diluted by distilled water to a concen-
tration of 5 wt% based on rubber content followed by the
Table 1 Compositions of cured epoxy filled with DNR.
Designation of composition
EP (CY230) (wt%)
Hardener (HY951) (wt%)
DNR (wt%)
C0 100 9 0.0
C1 100 9 0.5
C2 100 9 1.0
C3 100 9 1.5
C4 100 9 2.0
C5 100 9 2.5
addition of CH 3 CH
2 COCH
3 and K
2 S
2 O
8 in an amount of 4 – 6
vol% of total volume and 2 wt% based on the rubber content,
respectively. The pH of latex was adjusted to about 9 – 10 with
10 wt% aqueous KOH solution. Then, the reaction mixture
was mechanically stirred at a speed of 200 – 300 rpm at 60 ° C
on the sand (for the equal distribution of heat) for 24 h in
the presence of air. At the end of the reaction, the reaction
mixture was coagulated by 1 wt% aqueous CaCl 2 solution.
The coagulated substance was dissolved in n -hexane and
stirred with magnetic bar for 12 h. Then, the resulting solu-
tion was allowed to stand overnight and filtered. The filtrate
mixture was bathed with methanol followed by vacuum
drying at 40 ° C until the weight is made constant.
2.4.2 Preparation of rubber-filled EP
The DNR was dissolved completely in EP (CY230) at 100 ° C
using a mechanical stirrer at a speed of 500 rpm for 2 h. After
2 h, the whole solution is taken out and allowed to cool to a
temperature of 80 ° C. When a temperature of 80 ° C has been
attained, a 9 wt% hardener is mixed immediately. After the
addition of the hardener, viscous solution was again mixed
mechanically by a high-speed mechanical stirrer. The
viscous solution so obtained is poured into different moulds
for sample preparation for tensile testing. The compositions
of cured epoxy filled with DNR are given in Table 1 .
3 Results
3.1 Characterization of cured epoxy filled with DNR
The specimens were gold coated and examined by SEM
using a LEO435V6 instrument. The accelerating voltage
was kept at 10 kV and magnification factor of × 250. The
SEM test was conducted on the fractured surface to see the
mechanism of the fracture. The state of dispersion of DNR
Bereitgestellt von | De Gruyter / TCSAngemeldet | 10.248.254.158
Heruntergeladen am | 01.09.14 10:32
M. Agarwal et al.: Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin 3
A B
C D
Figure 1 SEM images of fracture surface for several cured epoxy: (A) pure epoxy, (B) 0.5 wt% rubber, (C) 1.0 wt% rubber, (D) 1.5 wt% rubber.
into the resin matrix plays a significant role on the improve-
ment of the mechanical properties of the cured epoxy. It is
seen from Figure 1 A – D that DNR are well dispersed in the EP
matrix and sharp surface failure occurs in all the tests. The
absence of any voids indicates a good adhesion between
the DNR and epoxy matrix. Figure 1A – C shows that the DNR
added to the epoxy matrix has completely bonded with it
and there is no free volume of DNR in the epoxy matrix.
From Figure 1D, it is evident that there is some free volume
of DNR that has not chemically bonded with the matrix, as
estimated from the observations. Due to this reason, the
mechanical strength increases up to 1 wt% rubber and then
decreases with further increase in the weight percentage of
rubber due to the excess or free volume of rubber.
3.2 Mechanical properties
The tensile test specimen ( Figure 2 ) prepared for each
weight percentage of DNR was loaded in uniaxial tension
on a 100 kN servohydraulic universal testing machine
(ADMET, Norwood, MA, USA) at 0.1 mm/s crosshead speed
according to ISO 1608:1972. The standard gauge length of
the specimen should be given by L 0 = 5.65 √ A
0 , where A
0
is the cross-sectional area of specimen (m 2 ) and L 0 is the
standard gauge length of the specimen (m).
From the stress strain curves as shown in Figure 3 ,
the ultimate strength, modulus of elasticity, and percent
elongations were determined. The room temperature and
humidity during testing were 32 ° C and 88%, respectively.
Remarkable differences have been observed in the stress
strain behavior due to the addition of DNR in the EP matrix.
3.3 Tensile properties
From the results, remarkable differences can be seen on
the ultimate tensile strength of DNR-filled cured epoxy
having different weight percentages of DNR tested at
0.1 mm/s crosshead speeds given in Table 2 . It can be seen
from the results that, for all specimens containing 1.0 wt%
DNR, the ultimate tensile strength is highest from among
the other compositions reported. About 42% increase in
ultimate tensile strength due to the addition of 1.0 wt%
DNR has been noticed compared to pure epoxy. This
increase in strength is observed due to the intermolecular
Bereitgestellt von | De Gruyter / TCSAngemeldet | 10.248.254.158
Heruntergeladen am | 01.09.14 10:32
4 M. Agarwal et al.: Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin
Grip section
Gagelength
Width ofgrip section
Dia. or width
“Reduced” section
Figure 2 Specimen of tension test.
80
70
60
50
40
Str
ess
(MP
a)
30
20
10
00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10
0 wt% of R
1.0 wt% of R
2.0 wt% of R1.5 wt% of R
2.5 wt% of R
0.5 wt% of R
0.12 0.14
Strain
Figure 3 Stress strain curve of different weight percentages of DNR.
Table 2 Tensile properties of cured epoxy filled with different weight percentages of DNR.
Designation of composition
DNR (wt%) Ultimate strength (MPa)
Elongation (%) Toughness (MPa)
Modulus of elasticity (MPa)
C0 0.0 47.40 5.10 1.737 1889.28
C1 0.5 52.28 9.50 3.001 1067.73
C2 1.0 67.33 12.58 5.229 912.74
C3 1.5 41.30 11.00 2.956 671.76
C4 2.0 39.89 7.17 1.416 526.75
C5 2.5 35.26 6.80 1.226 513.89
1480
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Ulti
mat
e st
reng
th (
MP
a)
70
60
50
40
0
30
200.5 1.0 1.5 2.52.0
Ultimate strength (MPa)
% Elongation
Elo
ngat
ion
(%)
Rubber (wt%)
Figure 4 Mechanical properties of cured epoxy filled with different
weight percentages of DNR.
bonding between the rubber particle to the resin particles.
A further addition of DNR on the EP decreases the ulti-
mate tensile strength of the DNR-filled cured epoxy due
to excess rubber particles, which is present free without
bonding. Similar observations have been noticed for
percent elongation as shown in Figure 4 . About 2.47 times
increase in the modulus of elasticity has been observed
due to the addition of 1.0 wt% DNR at 0.1 mm/s crosshead
speed. A further addition of the DNR decreases the percent
elongation but is higher than the neat epoxy material.
About 1.4 times increase in the modulus of elasticity is
noticed for the 2.0 wt% DNR-filled cured epoxy.
The variation of the modulus of elasticity and tough-
ness with the variation of rubber weight percentage is
as shown in Figure 5 . In Figure 5, it is seen that a non-
linear relation exists between the modulus of elasticity
and weight percentage of filler materials. The maximum
modulus of elasticity is found for neat resin. It has been
noticed that toughness is found to be maximum at the
addition of 1.0 wt% DNR compared to pure epoxy. This
increase in strength is due to the proper intermolecular
bonding between rubber particle to the resin particles. A
further addition of DNR on the EP decreases the tough-
ness of the DNR-filled cured epoxy due to excess rubber
particles, which is present unbonded. Keeping in view the
importance of the modulus of elasticity and toughness in
design and analysis, an attempt has been made to model
an empirical relation of the following type to interpret the
filler polymer interaction.
Up to 1.0 wt% DNR
2 2
R RE/T=1101 (W ) -2014 (W )+1087, R =1 (1)
More than 1.0 wt% DNR
2 2
R RE/T=-195.1 (W ) +972.5 (W )-792.4, R =1
(2)
Bereitgestellt von | De Gruyter / TCSAngemeldet | 10.248.254.158
Heruntergeladen am | 01.09.14 10:32
M. Agarwal et al.: Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin 5
where E and T are the modulus of elasticity in MPa and
toughness in MPa, respectively. W R denotes the weight
percentage of DNR. In the present case, toughness behav-
ior is the opposite after the addition of more than 1 wt%
DNR.
3.4 Hardness
All hardness tests are conducted on a Rockwell hardness
testing machine supplied by P.S.I. Pvt. Ltd. (New Delhi,
India) on R scale. The effect of the weight percentage of
DNR on the hardness values of DNR-filled cured epoxy is
shown in Figure 6 . It is found that the hardness of neat EP
is 44 HRR. The hardnesses of the fabricated cured epoxy
filled with 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 wt% DNR are 43, 41, 39,
37, and 36 HRR, respectively, as given in Table 3 .
Figure 6 indicates that the hardness decreases with
the DNR content, reflecting the reinforcement formed in
the DNR-filled cured epoxy. The variation of the ratio of
the modulus of elasticity with the hardness of DNR-filled
cured epoxy is shown in Figure 7 . Figure 7 illustrates that
the hardness value follows a nonlinear relation with the
modulus of elasticity of the DNR-filled cured epoxy. An
attempt has been made to correlate the modulus of elas-
ticity with hardness. The following correlation has been
obtained:
5 4 3
R R R
2 2
R R
E/H=-6.950 (W ) +49.76 (W ) -129.8 (W )
+151.8 (W ) -85.44 (W )+42.93, R =1,
(3)
where E and H are the modulus of elasticity in MPa and
hardness in R-scale, respectively. W R denotes the weight
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Mod
ulus
of e
last
icity
(M
Pa)
2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
4000 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.52.0
Modulus of elasticity
Toughness
Toug
hnes
s (M
Pa)
Rubber (wt%)
Figure 5 Modulus of elasticity and toughness of cured epoxy filled
with different weight percentages of DNR.
Har
dnes
s (H
RR
)
45
44
43
42
41
40
39
38
37
36
350 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.52.0
Rubber (wt%)
Figure 6 Hardness of cured epoxy filled with different weight
percentages of DNR.
Table 3 Hardness of cured epoxy filled with different weight
percentages of DNR.
Designation of composition
DNR (wt%) Hardness
C0 0.0 44
C1 0.5 43
C2 1.0 41
C3 1.5 39
C4 2.0 37
C5 2.5 36
Mod
ulus
of e
last
icity
(M
Pa)
/har
dnes
s (H
RR
)
45
50
35
40
25
30
15
20
5
0
10
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.52.0
Rubber (wt%)
E/H
Poly. (E/H)
Figure 7 E/H ratio of cured epoxy filled with different weight
percentages of DNR.
percentage of DNR. Equation (3) indicates that the non-
linear relationship between the modulus of elasticity
and hardness has a good correlation. It shows that the
Bereitgestellt von | De Gruyter / TCSAngemeldet | 10.248.254.158
Heruntergeladen am | 01.09.14 10:32
6 M. Agarwal et al.: Investigation of toughening behavior of epoxy resin
modulus of elasticity is directly related to the hardness of
this type of cured epoxy filled with DNR.
4 Conclusions A DNR-filled cured epoxy was prepared. Such DNR-filled
cured epoxy was experimentally characterized by means
of microscopy, tensile testing, and hardness testing.
Remarkable improvements in the mechanical proper-
ties have been noticed due to the addition of DNR in
EP. Regression models were developed to simulate the
mechanical behavior of such materials from the volume
content of the DNR.
Acknowledgment: The authors express their gratitude
and sincere thanks to Department of Science & Technol-
ogy, India for providing finance to carry out this research
work smoothly.
Received November 17 , 2013 ; accepted December 14 , 2013
References [1] Huang J, Kinloch AJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2753 – 2762.
[2] Huang J, Kinloch AJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2763 – 2769.
[3] Guild FJ, Kinloch AJ. J. Mater. Sci. 1995, 30, 1689 – 1697.
[4] Barcia FL, Amaral TP, Soares BG. Polymer 2003, 44,
5811 – 5819.
[5] Shukla SK, Srivastava D. Polym. Sci. 2006, 100, 1802 – 1806.
[6] Chikhi N, Fellahi S, Bakar M. Eur. Polym. J. 2002, 38,
251 – 264.
[7] Thomas R, Ding Y, He Y, Yang L, Moldenaers P, Yang W, Czigany T,
Thomas S. Polymer 2008, 49, 278 – 294.
[8] Saadati P, Baharvand H, Rahimi A, Morshedian J. Iranian Polym. 2005, 14, 637 – 646.
[9] Seluga U, Kurzeja L, Galina H. Polym. Bull. 2008, 60, 555 – 567.
[10] Singh VK, Gope PC. J. Reinforced Plast. Compos. 2010, 29,
2450 – 2468.
[11] Okwu UN, Akinlabi AK. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 106,
1291 – 1293.
[12] Vitaly R, Eduardo A. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 235 – 254.
[13] Tanaka Y, Sakaki T, Kawasaki A, Hayashi M, Kanamaru K,
Shibata K. US Patent 5,1999,856,600.
Bereitgestellt von | De Gruyter / TCSAngemeldet | 10.248.254.158
Heruntergeladen am | 01.09.14 10:32