Finance Final Agenda 10-18-11 - Macomb Community Action

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I S. Main St., S(h Floor

Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043 586.469.5125 FAX 586.469.5993

macombcoulltymi.govlbollfdofcommissiollers

FINANCE COMMITIEE

TUESDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2011

AGENDA

1. Call to Order

2. Pledge of Allegiance

3. Adoption of Agenda

4. Approval of Minutes dated 8-23, 9-13 and 9-27 (special), 2011 (previously distributed)

5. Public Participation (five minutes maximum per speaker, or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson related only to issues contained on the agenda)

6. Executive Session to Discuss Labor Negotiations

7. Third Quarter Revenue and Expense Reports (mailed)

8. Review Ordinance (#8) Re: Comprehensive Budget for the General, Special (mailed) Revenue and Enterprise Funds for Fiscal Years Ending 12-31-12 and 12-31-13

9. Review of Draft Purchasing Ordinance (attached)

a) Comments by County Executive's Office

10. Request for Special Appropriation for Drinking Water Monitoring System (mailed)

11. Adopt County Drain Debt Millage Levy (mailed)

12. Adopt Veterans' Services Millage Levy (mailed)

13. 2011 Apportionment Report (mailed)

MACOMB COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS K.h,D VO'""", Mam.n E. Sauger hed Miller Dislric! g Di.met 2 Dismcl 9

""" V,ce L"bair SergeaJJl-A.t-Arms

Tow MD<m - District I David Fl'fIJD. Dlilricl 4 lames L. Carabelli - o..trid 6 Roland R. Frascbetti· Districc 10 Bob Smith· Dismct 12

l'bill;p A DiMaria _ Districl 3 Roy On!eInki - DIstrict ~ DoD BroWll- District 7 Kathy Toe,co. Disn-ic1 II loe Sabatini- Dismcl J3

FINANCE COMMITTEE AGENDA OCTOBER 18, 2011 PAGE 2

14. Approve County Clerk's Plan to Offer Veterans Photo ID Card for a Fee (mailed) (recommended by Justice & Public Safety Committee on 10-11-11)

15. Approve County Clerk's Implementation of Enhanced Search Real Estate (mailed) "Super Index" Consumer Protection System (recommended by Justice & Public Safety Committee on 10-11-11)

16. Appointments of Law Firms (mailed)

17. New Business

18. Public Participation (five minutes maximum per speaker or longer at the discretion of the Chairperson)

19. Adjournment

MEMBERS: Brown-Chair, MiIIBr.Vice.Chair, Carabelli, DiMaria, Flynn, Frasche«i, Gralewski, Moceri, Sabatini, Sauger, Smith, Tocco and Vosburg.

7. RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: _

AGENDA ITEM:, _

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN

RESOLUTION TO receive and file the Third Quarter Revenue and Expense Reports submitted by the County Executive's Office

INTRODUCED BY: Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee

COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE Finance 10-18-11

Macomb Courrty, Michig~n

Quarterly Revenue Report - Summary b1 Fund

Quarter Ended September 30, 20t1

Descrtption

December 31 Year-End F"rlds

General Fund

Freedom Hill PM,-

Heatlh Oepartmenl

Martha T Bef'"

Re$earch & Re/""en,,~ Cenler

Senior Citizens Service~

V<:\er<lns' Affairs

Adopted

Budget

• 198,059,012

262,507

19,244,156

22,834,441

1,160,3&6

1,711,542

1,100,670

Amended

__"_u~

, 199,243,172

262,507

19,469,747

22,834,441

1,160.356

1,750.~34

1,100870

$

om

Actual

103,024,171>

42,843

943,599

,J,985,41>1

16.023

n346

30,~47

no

Actllilll

, 130,753.473

129,952

4,367,180

15,451,856

63,638

314,461

1,122,683

Over (Under)

Budget

, (1)8,4904,8''l~J

(132,555)

(15,102,567)

(7,382,585)

(1,096,518)

(1,n~.973)

21,813

% UtiliZed

6562%

4950%

22.43%

6767%

550%

1796%

101.96%

, 244,372,884 , 245,826,721 , 108.124,900 , 152,203,443 , (93,623,28-4) 6191%

September 30 Year.End Fu(Ods

Adu~ Drug Court

Child Care Fund

Cornmun,tt CorrectIOns

Community MenLal Heallh

Community S"'rvl~~

Friend o/lhe Court

Hl'allh Grants

PrOlje<;Ullng Atlorney Grants

R~,

Sheritf G'anls

Subs lance Abuse

, 240.000

27.817,670

1,321,143

194,515.895

16,792,BDS

13,240,207

3,976,932

2,086,907

84,385,518

2,120,861

8,8.52,285

, 226.595

27.7B:,893

1.3(8.L75

195.208,445

18.223,869

13,249,007

4,41(1,243

2,086,907

70.108,399

2,120,851

9,001,428

, 5.462

2,004.794

257,09lJ

68,404.81D

2,780,834

2,476.458

920,088

224.717

20,628,423

189,593

3,170,757

, 128,847

15.1S:.JOI

1.041.144

201,366.726

16,344,749

6.498.067

4,391,936

1,224,136

65,376,191

1,141,090

8,896,673

, (97,748)

(12,620,5"7)

(277,131j

6,158,281

(1,879,120)

(4,752,940)

(18,305)

(862.771)

(19,010,127)

(979,771)

(104,755)

5<';88%

54,57%

78,98%

10315%

89 f>9~"

E~, 13%

99.58%

58,66%

9325%

53,80%

95,1>4%

$ 355,353,124 , 343,736.927 , 101.063,026 , 323,569,862 $ (34,444.98-4) £l4,13%

10118120113:44AM

Macomb County, Michiga"

Quart"rtf Revenue ReJ>Ort

Quarte' Ended September lO, 2011

De~criplion

Taxes

Propertlla.e, ,

Adopted

8udg~l

\rn.~ll.%4

Fund General Fund ({)e(; l1 Yea' Endl

Amended OW

8udgel Actual

, 114,247,lO7 , 93 7~9.oS9 ,

nD

AClu.1

104,261,877

Over (Under)

8ud(lel

(9%~4JO)

% Utilized

9128%

UcenH' and permits 42U. 4OO 433,400 II)4,Oi! 335.169 (98Bl) 7733%

federal qr.ml> 73,000 pr,-.0 16.845 I'~(.. I<"~i 2308·...

Slale grants

Court r.,anclf'g

CIga,etle lax

Llqua lax

OIhel >!ale granls

5,27~,971

27.515

1,88S.081

602,000

5,274.9'1

27.~IS

1 ,S88,08 I

~02 000

1.21J'lB5

6B\,277

138,7B6

2,551412

~61.2;1

~~eo's

(2,717,499)

(27,515)

(1,206,BlYlj

(343,922)

4ll 48'1,

000"0

36 08%

42.87''

Charges for 'e",lces

Court Cl>S" onj fe'"

Ce,,<fi'3<! ""'pi",

P'obal;'" '"er<,gh( Ie,,,

Real r"'~le [1,v:lSi", f~,

R","C"~,ng f~~;

Rent,.

Ro~d palrc>

('!her She"" Se",'ce'

Anomeyl....s

PubliC wor~s-pump ,(atlC•.,

Personal se"'ICe,

I"male housi,,~

Sod e="n fees

Comm"""ns

Fo",ercare

OI~ef charges I", ~~,c.,<

0(h .., revenue

2 9'32.~Ll()

82321~

S 15,0(11.'

2 500.0(")

2, lB<;. 'flJ

4l.150

, :' 1~.911

f ~9Q-l-41

1,~cXI ~cXI

~&4 'X,;

l,025,1XXl

1.823,1XXl

349.1 0<

958.000

800,000

2,386.658

299~.~00

&.'3 :' 19

C1 ~,l\(}(j

],500 000

2.185S00

4J,750

8,217.921

1490,441

1.~00 ~OO

1,7505GI

1fJ25.1J'JQ

\,SnlJ'JQ

:<49.1 ....

958 oorJ

I'O)UlJO

2.4~4.2:l2

567,356

217.138

1"·1.22;'

4'/l.1)2

"'1~.98C

15.';S

1 ~;& 1%

:091u(}4

26~.360

\0,750

241,78G

339,696

204.i90

188.967

85.025

421.~~~

1 765,268

6<;.1 J21

G1G.G02

1,(1)9,50B

I 4 I~, I~~

57,542

5,994,~B7

I, 1~2.6Wj

I.n~{5J

2:l5,77,

)90.171

1,147,653

589,20!1

486,5Dl

Y.M.sn 1.~2.1()9

fS3

(1,7n.'),.

( 16~F"'-;1

(193,J9~1

( 1.2)O,~?<)

(770,34~i

8 7~~

(2',";.2341

"c:~5])

(~;; 1\3)

i t .51'./95)

1:;)-1B~91

(~7<,,341)

239,465

(471,493)

(495.427)

((141,523)

153

<;t 9~··;'

.'94;'\<0

,5 ""'<,.

5018%

&4 75%

12010%

72.99%

77 35%

3168%

n~7%

Tl09%

62.95%

t53 H°,,"

>0 ,e"!o

J6 07'';

~, 1Q'':'

100 (IO'k

Inveslment i"come 2. 'SO.OOO 2.150,000 23,284 ~7,[lJQ (2,052,970) 451%

tnler deputm."1JI1 charges

Indi'<><;1 co.f allJcatlon a,410.7:14 e,410,734 9J9.41~ 2.7J1.826 (5Na<o:Ju) 1248%

F;np~ and lorftiture-s !lSI.DOC' BSI,OClO 188,410 519,490 13JI51uj ",104%

Olhe, ",venue 92,000 92,000 1.7~0 11,~29 (60,571) 1242%

Prior Yea, Fund Bal"nt~ 13.577,708 9,154,750 ('-1,154,750) 0(10%

Opera~nq tran.rers In ,6.108,840 26,279,&lO 2(),OOO (26.:'59.640) 006%

, 198,059,012 , 1~~,N8,312 • 10l,024,176 , 1l0,7~',471 , (U.U4.399) 65 62"';

2 1011712011 ~ 50 PM

M""omb County, MI<:hlgan

auarl<>"y Revenue Rep<><1

auarter Ended Seplember 30. 2011

Desclip'llon

Cnuges lor ,e",ices

R~,

Commissms

00..- "'3'9"S I'" ServiceS

,

Fund: Frudom Hill Park (De<: 31 YeR' Endl

Adopted Amended om BUdget Budget Actual

• , 40,000 40,000 11.598

1~5,OI:X' 1,5,000 31.250

•

m A<:lu.1

'.>00

34,102

93,750

Operallng transf.... in 91,SO' 97,507

2'62,507 , 262.S01 • 42,848 , 129,952

Description

Licenses and pennits •

Fund: H..ltII O"partment (Dec 31 YearEnd)

Adopted Amend8<l om BUdget Budget Aclual

948,501 , 948.501 • 71.7J5 •

no Actual

9047.340

$tate gran'" 1,978.553 2,002,894 561,816 1,622,164

Charges lor se",le,,"

Certified cop,es

Othe, charges lor se""CeS

Other "d,rllnistra(,ve """""'"

Ot~'" r"""nue

Medicarelm"<Jicaid

44,700

1.604.148

80,000

"'.000 5M.311

44.700

1,604,148

80.000

"'.000 569.311

10.886

261,567

1,71S

14,708

10.425

28,480

873,217

U,g.'\1

24,728

673,542

Inler departmenLlI cn.rges

Indirl'd <:os( alloc.ah,;m 200,178 206.178 4.313 144.66:1

Fines and rorfe;I""" '000 '.000 U45 11.604

O!her ",venue '.000 ''''' 2,129 13.402

Prior Yea, Fund Balance 86,000 226,750

Dpe.-..Ilng lnnsft,rs In

•

1J.676.764

19,244.156 •

n,676,764

19,469,147 • 943,599 • 4,361,180

Over (Und~r)

Budg.t 'to Utilized

, ''''' (5.2981

(31,250)

1OCUXI%

86.76%

75,00%

•

(97.507)

(132,555)

0.00%

4950%

Over (Under)

Budll" , (1,161)

'to UtIlized

99.8S%

(MO.73D) 7864%

(16110)

(73D,SJI)

(52.0'>91

(9,272)

104,330

6:.71')<,

54 43%

:J.4 93%

7273%

11833%

(63,518) 69,49%

,~ 128.93%

7.902

(216,150)

:14367%

C"',

(13,676,764)

• (15.102.~61J

000%

21.43 0 ",

3 1011712011 4:50PM

~bcomb County, ";chlgan

Quarm1y Revenu. Repo<1

Qua,,",' Ended Septembe' 30, 2011

Description

Ch.ryeo 10, servi<e$

OIMr C1larg"s for Mrv"",.

Qlh..,- adm'nl5(ral;ve services

~edicwelmed,c.aid

prtor Yea' Fund Balance

Fund' Martha T Beny (De<: 31 Vea, End)

Adopkd Amended om __ B\ldgel__ Budgel Actual

, 2,887,547 , 2,B87,~7 , 529,807

W.OOO W.OOO

le,8W,894 18,868,894 3,455,654

48,000 ~!J.OOO

,

TID

Actllal

1,971,776

9.597

13,410,483

Ove, (Under)

Iludy"l

, (91~,7ill

(20,403)

(5.398,411)

(48,000)

"4 lJIililed

68,29%

31.99%

7139%

0=. Opoe"'ti"g t,ansre~ in 1.000,000 1,000,000 (l,OOO,CJO(lI 0,00'.--,

, 22.834,441 , 22,834,441 , 3,98~,4ii1 , 15,451,856 , (7,382,585) 67,67%

D<-scMplion

Charges fo, services

Fund; Re$~a,ch" Refe,ence Center (Dee 31 Vea, End)

Adopted Ame"d..d om TID

~~ Budget Aclual Actual , 87,267 87,267 , 16,023 , 6J,e38

Qver (Unde')

Budg"', (23,42~1

... Utilized

7315%

Prio, Yea' Fund Balance 35,148 35,148 (35,148) 000%

Operating Ira"sf.-o; In 1,037,9<11 1,037,941 ( 1.037.941) 000%

, 1,180,356 , 1,180,~56 , 16,023 , 6J,BJ~ S (I,O_98,518) 5.50%

4 1~1712011 450 PM

Macom!> County, Michigan

Quartertr Revenue R..port

Quarter Ended Sepwmber 30. 2011

Fund: S..niorClI:llens Se .....lces (Dec 31 Year Erld)

Description

fed""'IO"'nls , Adopted

Budg.. l , Am..nded

Budget

115,862 , ow

Actual

36,495 , Actual

O"..r (Under)

Budget

, (17,213)

Chaf9e5 for ser-lces

other d'l""le5""" services

In h1d revenue

467,170

114,)07

~61, \70

11~,307

43.453 1~,469 (2<:>7.701\

(11007)

Othef- re~enue 2,3~7 lS,J.l3 IS,J.l3

Prior Yea, fund Balance n,~84 (28.454)

O""",lIng Iransf..~ in

•

___---'

, -'-

314,451 $

~I'~.O~23,61 I)

(1,435,973)

Fund: V.. l""'n'· Ana,,,, (O..c 31 Y..a, End!

Descrlptlon

7ues

Property laxes ,

Adopted

Budget

1, :00,870 ,

Amended

Budget

1,100,870 •

QrD

Actual

25,909 , Actua'

1.109,071

Over (Und~r)

Budg'"

, 8,201

_____,_,_,_, --'-n"'O'"'~ 13,612

, 1,100,&10 , 1,100,an , 30,447 , l,122,68l 21.813

'Y. Utilized

85.27"",

42-'0%

000%

100,00%

0.00%

000"';'

17.96'",

% Ulmzed

100 74%

10000%

101,98')'"

5 1011712011 ~:50PM

M~co",b County, Michigan

Ou~rteny Reyenue Repon

Quaner Eoded Seplember 30, 2011

Do!scripllon

Fund:

Adopted

8udgol

, ,Ol8.J<J9

Community CorrKll"n$ (Sep 30 Yoar Endl

Amende<! OTO

Budgel

1,025,541

A<tual

257.(00

Actual

692,777

oyer (Unde,)

Budget

(132,764i

% UUIi,ed

87.05%

Oper.>ling lnn~leB in ____'C'"'c.'o"" 192,734 __~_ __--",~~.~~~, I ,4<lJ.5lj SO.66%

, 1,321,143 ,

, 1011712011 4:50 PM

Mac""'b County, Michigan

Quarterty Reven .... Rep<>'r1

C1"arterEnd~ September 30, 2011

fund' Community Mental Health (Sep:lO Year End)

Adopted Amend~ am no

De»criptJ"n

F~eral grana • BUdget

m.517 • Budget

399,517 • Actual

97.4516 • Actual

138.066

Stale gron!! 26,771,141 3HJ9,305 10,705.202 ::11,3n.317

Cha.rges lor ""'rvlces

other marges lor se,....;e.,s 1149,221 869,738 267,600 906,862

~edicarelmedicald 15(),372,617 159500,224 57.204,143 167,7613,321

1nler floeportmenlal ch.rge~

Indirecl co", all<>eation 52,566 5~.656

Investment ;"C<>nll' 67,107 , 2.724 62,116

Dlher ",Yeo"" 40,133 38,050 117 ,&45 159,393

PriorYe., Fund Balance (1.1~8,762)

Operating lr.ln.fe~ In 4.030,600 4,030,600 1.007,&5(1

• 194,515,69S 195,20B,44S • 66,404,a10 • 201,:166,725

Over (Under)

Budgel 'l'. Utilized

• (261.451) 3<1 56%

(116,983) 9'963""

39,124 104..50"

8.2613,097 105.16'''

152,&i6) OUO·"

(4.991) 92.56%

121,3<13 41890%

1181l,762 000%

(3.022,950) 25.00%

• 6.158,2BO 103.15%

7 lOIn/lUll 450 PM

Macomb CO<.Inty. Michigan

quarterly R..venu.. Report

quarter Ended September 30, 2011

o..scrlpllon

Fe<:Ieral grants

Sla18 gtant5

•

Fund: Community Services (Sep 30 Yur Enu!

Adopted Amenued om Budget Budgel Actual

10,703,479 • l1.315.Z8B • 1,659,480 • B16,552 I SolO,6Z5 230,165

YOD

Aclual

1029B,))9

1.199,540

Cha'1ll'$ for services 4,300,28:) 4,327.848 820,919 4,227.601

Other ",venue 160,625 2e8,4J:' )6,260 200,450

Prior Year Fund Balant" 80,000 50,151

Operating Iran.f"", In

, 7)1,667

16,792,BlIG , 701,525

16,22~,869 , )3,990

2,180,834 , 418,819

16,344,749

DeStripl;on

Federal gran~ ,

Fund' Friend of the Court (Sep ~O Year End)

Adopted Am"nded om no Budgel BUdget A~'\ual AClUal------

6,722,7)1 , 6,053567 , 1,562,9-l9 , 4,1Sol,259

S"'k'II,ant5 13,550 691,514 660,149 669,164

Charges tor Gervlce. 640,000 ~.~ 229,042 735,866

Other "'V'm"" 4,100 4,329

(nveslment income ,18 '" Operating Iran.f..", in 5,863,926

• 13,240,201

5,863,926

• 11,249,007 • 2,476,4S1I • 2,9.31,963

8,496,067

Over (Under)

Budget ',(, Utillud , (1,016,9-l9) 91,01%

,

(341.085) 77 86·...

i1oo,247) 91.66%

(87,9621 6950'",

(50,151) 0,00%

(282,7061 5970%

11,679,120) B~ 69'i~

0,.." (Under]

Budgel "J. Ulilized , ( 1.899308) 66 62%

12:'~~j)J 9677%

95,666 114 98'",

U29 100,00%

100 00%"" (2,931963) 5000%

, (4,752,940) 64.13%

B 1C1't7l20114:5OPM

Macomb County, Ulchlyan

OUart"rI, Revenue Report

Quarter Ended S"plember 30, 20"

FllOd: Heallh Grann (S..g1! Yur End)

Adop"'d AmendttJ am DO Over (Und"rf

Descripl'on Budgel Budge' Aclual Aclual BUdget % Utilized

Federal grants '72,122 , 172,122 , 40,37~ , 103,317 • (68,805) 60,03%

SUO'" granb V~82,8!2 3,:149.123 850,750 3.331,879 117244) 99 49'';'

Cllaryes 1.,..- urwicu

Med.c<relmedi:aid 383,0'9 383,019 12,819 674,3.33 29',314 176,06%

omer charyes lor service~ &4,768 64,766 14,429 75,339 10.573 1'632%

Other ",venu' '.000 '.000 1 71 5 6,714 (1,286) 8393'';'

QP<l...llnglrallsle", In 358,2'3 4X1.213 200,356 (232,8571 4625%

• 3,918,932 • 4,410,24:1 , na,~8 , 4,391,938 • (18,3051 99.58'';'

Fund: p,--o,,;ecuting AlIO.me~ Granb (Sep 30 year End)

Adoptood Amended am no Over (Unde,)

Descriplion Budgel Budg"! Actual AClual BUdge! % Ulilized

Feder"l grants; • 437,403 , ',214,350 • 224,717 , 779,,80 , (435,G1l1) &4.17',.,

Stale 9 ...n'" 841,963 65,0'" 31,6-53 133,363) 4$,58%

Fines and lortellll .... 1,60:1 um ~DIVIO!

Operating trans:".. in 807,541 807:.41 411.600 (395,941) 5-0,97'"

• 2,086,907 , 2,086,907 • 224,711 • 1.224,136 , (862,171) 5866%

Fund: Roads (Sep 30 Yea' End)

Adopted Amen<l<>d OW no Over (Un<ler/

Description audge' Budgel Actual Aclual BUdget % Utilized

Licenses & permits • &45,500 , 440,78U 71,~60 326,488 , (114,292) 7407%

Fed..",1 granb 21.330,291 17,630.291 8,681.079 18,029,la4 3ge.~93 102,26%

Sb,te grants 42.zg1,300 37,400,000 8,641,a65 36,761.350 (644,650) sa,2S'%

Chafll.... for services 12,478,375 11,247.957 2,974,246 9,753,310 (1,494,547) 86,71'';'

Investment inc<)m~ 177,238 200,/lI'XI 59,27) 230,859 30,659 "5.43%

Op....llng lransle", in 275,000 275,000 100.00'';'

Prior Yea. Fund Balance 7,463,914 3,163,371 13,163,371) 0,00%

• 8-4,366,616 • 70,106,399 • 20,628,423 • 65,376,''i' , (4,732,208) 9325%

, 10/,7120114:5OPM

Macomb CbOnly. Michigan

Quarterly Re .."nue Report

Quarter EnlM<l Seplt'mber 30, 2011

10 10117/20\1 • so PM

Macomb Coun~. Michigan

Quartl!rfY E:<pendilu", Report. Summary by Fund

Quarter En~ September 30. 2011

Description

De<:ember 31 Year-End funds

Gen...alFund

Freedom HIli Part

Heanh Departmenl

Martha T BE'07)I

Researm & Rei",,,,,,,,, Cenler

senoor CdlZenS serv,,,,,, Vel....-ans· Ar..;"

Adopted

Budget

• 19oB,~~,D1~

262,507

19,2M,156

22,834,441

1,150,356

1.711.f42

1,100.ero

Amended

Budget

, 199,248,372

262,507

19,469,747

n834,M1

1,1>;0.356

1.,50,434

1,1oo,8 i O

QOO

Actual

, 33,460,n9

34,366

~.920,2D9

4,853.489

172,18&

3~9,~17

205.36J

ITO

Actual

, 93,616,5010

65.415

10,4GB, T:;!l

14,778]33

551.025

98),495

601.883

OoIer (Underl

Budget

• 11D5,631,8J2j

(197m2)

(9,OOlH>;l)

(8,056,108)

(6CJCl.3)1)

(766,939)

(498,987)

% Utilized

45,908"'"

£4,92%

5.3 77%

64.72%

4749%

56.19%

501,57";

• 244.372,884 , 245,826.7U • 43,005,829 , 121.0&4.829 , (124.761 898\ 4~2~'10

Seplember:l.() Year.End Funds

Adu~ Dru9 Court

Ch;ld Care Fund

Ccwnmunity Correction~

CommunITy Mental ~3nn

CommuMy s.e""""s

Fr>end aI the Coort

Heanh Granb

Prosecuting Allome, Granls

R_, Shrrill Granl,

SubSlance ..,OO.e

, 240,000

17.817.670

1.321,14~

194,515B95

16,7~2.606

I J.240,:I07

3,978,932

2,006.907

B4,J8&.61~

2,12(l,~'i1

6,852,185

, 12&,595

27,782.B~8

1.318,275

1~.208,445

18.223.869

13,249,007

4,410243

2,00~907

70,100.'399

2,12(1.~61

9.001.428

, 49,401

5.235,052

362.798

43,834.266

3,812,204

~.065,2oo

1,186,120

512,121

23."-40,501

380,969

1,575.313

, 181.410

:9,151.004

1,293,517

163,951.222

17.514.979

12,S1~.1G8

3,n~, 11)4

1.895.918

66.258.430

1,&41,712

1",,14.791

, (45,185)

18,631,El94)

12P5S)

[312S~,2l3)

(70B,89O)

(7J0,B~9)

(686,139)

(19O,'j891

P.849.989)

(479.149)

___(2.685,637)

8(l06%

6893%

98.120/,

BJ~

96. 11'1{

94 48%

8444%

90.85%

94.51%

n.41·'" 6793'\1,

, 355.353.124 , 343,736.927 , 83,453,9045 , 2904.247.255 , (49,489~72) 65.60%

11)'17/2011 4:52 PM

• • • •

Mocomb Counly. ~ichigan

Ouarterly Expendilu,e Report

Ouort.,,- Ended Sepl@mbe'JO,2011

Fund: Gene,"1 Fund (Dec Jl Yea, End)

Adopl<>d Amendod orD (O_lUnde,

Oooscnption Budget AClual Actual Budget "" Ulili,ed

Boar<! or Commi".ione",

Salafies and f1inge beneM. 1,192.568 1.201.256 2/0,419 602.6~9 396,S97 66.92%

Op""'t"'~ .",pen••• 117,790 192,415 31,382 56,200 124,21~ 3544'"

',110.3~8 301,801 5l2.812 62.49""

Publl<Aftai",

3,142

3,'~1 3,142

Cin:uil Court

S~I"';.s iO"ld fnnge benefits 4,707.1ge 4.700,025 1.1n.079 3.239.787 1.468.236 08.81'"

OPE'(a(lng expenses ____ '4,BOIl,416 4,810,016 __'_,100,191 ___-"2.698,213 V11,743 ".6.10%

9,Sll>,1>1~ ____.',518,041 ~,810 ___--'.'.~93',O~g ___c'C,579,981 6U9%

Family Coun.ehn~

Saianes aM /ling" benefits 58,427 15.382 43.130 H.6~%

O~.,..t"g e>q>ense. 149,921 24,923 62,870 41 8~91.

208,348 208,498 4(1,305 106,600 101,698 51.13''''

District Court-Rom""

Salanes;)lloj fnn~e benefits 87<';,859 85l.l.0\8 214.4S5 6OQ.326 24«692 706Y,"

Op."'I;n~ e>q>eMes 197,850 197.850 42,800 98.0$5 '19,795 4956..

Cap"," ""nay 26.8041 21Ylli 21,:106 5,53$ ;9 ).8%

1,014.709 218,651 119.687 355,022 66.97'10

Dis!ric, Court-Jr<! C.,~,

Ope,a~ng e;<penses 9,686 20.137 29,863 40.27%

:0,137 29,863 40.27"4

District Court Ne.. aonim"",

Salanes and fling" """"frts 1.123,061 1.117,9:16 279.385 19l1.917 JI~.~9'.l 71 47'11.

Ope,atU1Q exo""'''''' 216.327 219.Jl1 ~,427 19.923 199.4lJ.l 9.00%

Capilal ",,!ay 2.12,~ 2,125 O~

1,3J9,368 1,339,188 818,860 520,ns 61.14"4

Probate Court- Menl.1

Salaries ""d """Oe l>e1en\s 110.6\4 710.614 157,446 461.788 247,6<0; 65 I~%

Operaling e>q>enses 261,3~ 2&11.043 68.2116 161.9>;4 6tl,009 6786%

977,967 918.n7 225,TH 333,915 6!.""'"

P,obate Court. WIll. a ES\a'(e

'ialaries and rrin~e !>MMt, 2,232.241 564,493 1,&4M91 598,744 7363%

~ra"ng e>q>en'''''' 206.035 56.556 ___ 133,:J(16 12.729 &1.70%

1,430,221 2.418,.176 U3.049 1,116,803 7l.~7'"

1<l117121l11 4:52 PM

"'acomb CC>I>nty, Michigan

Quarterly Exp.ondilu,. Report

Quarter E'lded Sept....,b<o, ~U, 2UI 1

Fund' Gene",1 Fund (Dec Jl Year Endl con,inued

Adopted Amended QlD no {Over) Under

Descripllon Budget Budgel Actual Actual B<IdoJe' % Ulillzed

Family C<>o.Irt· Juve"~e

Sa","e; ""d ~nlle benefits 3.996.473 ~.828.809 92~,297 2.818,211 1,010598 73 61%

Of""3~ng e,penses 1,569.742 1.S73..SH 337,711 719.391 854.186 4572%

___~~,~6,215 5,-4112,)&8 1,261,008 ),537.602 1,884,786 65.48'1.

Proballon - Clrcuil Court

124.9~9 128.024 91.218 36,608 7125%---~ 124.999 118,024 33,611 91,216 )6,806 7115'1.

Probabon· Dist",,' Court

Sdl"ri", ""d fringe benefils 979,600 20Ul4 597,5-5~ :>132.135 00.99%

Oper.>t;ng expense. ____~7D,992 18.111 30.523 ______40,469 42.99%

1,049,944 1,O~,6!2 211,515 H6.078 422.604 59.78%

Jury Commi"!c>n

Opecahnll ".peo"", 118.121 12,453 24.902 91.21!? 21.44%

Capital oUllay 34,978 :'0.200 10.559 14.417 30.19%

72,156 151,091 15,5~3 35,451 11S,6J6 lJ.47',l,

County Execulive

Sala';". and fringe benefils 645.885 857.272 2<7,20-1 3~9,995

Op...-atinll expense. 36.442 211.646 30.624 141,744

682,301 ____'I,OU,618 257,828 S86,1~,) ____--'481,739 54.84'1.

Election'

Oper"',ng expen"'. 36.5f>4 1,8'.8 5.7'l8 30.786 158.5%

Ope'al;nlllra"s'"'' oul 337.950 JJ1,Slf,a 0.00%

374,534 1,856 5,7i16 ]68,736 1.55'1.

InformaUon Technology

Salaries and Innlle bene~l's 3,402,021 J.l';4,193 827.329 2,331.775 1.016.418 6970'%

Ope"""'ll expenses 2.102.773 2,273.~73 218,~ 1,520.453 752.920 f;i<i.811'1.

5,5<l4,794 $.627.566 1,045,,1] ~.656,n8 1,769.l38 68.56'1.

Reimb ....._en'

Sal<'tliu ""d fring" benefil. 7l5.589 173.219 490.726 244.863 86,71%

Opetalinll e",,,,,,,,. $3,581 6.518 _____ ,0.171 3~,410 3765%

lU,110 181,735 S10.8H U8,<7J 64.74'1.

COfPO"'liOfl Counsel

Salaries ""d Innge benelil. 811.281 812.281 211.680 600,916 211,365

Oper...ing expen"". 40,425 __--"11 ,001 25.200 15.225".= 851,281 852,706 221,881 526,'16 216.590 13.43'1.

C""ntyClerk

Salane. and fringe be!1e11I. 3.536.917 3,537.260 680,461 2.S15.234 Lon026 71.11%

Opera ling expen.es 396.743 400.695 117,947 25Q.OZ9 1508,686 61.18%

Capital ",,'ay 14.674 1(,.,73 i)'il.!.I9%

),933.660 J,9/iO,621 ')98,428 2,779,')38 1,180.69) 70.19',l,

3 1(0'1712011 4:52 PM

IIIIac"",t> County. IIII;c~i~an

Ou.J1.e<IV Expenditure ReP<><1

Qua,li" Ended September JO, 201 \

Adopted Amended OlD no (Over) Un"".

Budget Budget Ac",.1 Acl"al Budgd % utilized

Apportionment C"m",i.~ion

Operal"9 expense. 38.774 3B.774 000'

___ JU14 38.174 0.00%

fjna"ce Departm..nt

Salan". 3i"Id Iring" benefit;, 1,157.580 1,760,~I 1,100,189 ~~2.792 6293%

59.540 35,454 62.6B%Ope<aling .,><,pe""," 94.3~2 ~1.1H.729 699,246 6U2'.l.1,851,962 1,855,975

Risk IIIIanagement $. Siorety

Solanes and Inng" b_", l41,036 J<l1.0J6 00.7(11 2~~)&I ~.272 72.00%

,~Operaling "><pens,," 17.B6e ___~n.093 7.911 1~.132 l4,25%

364,129 2~3,675 110,454 69.67%

Equallution

Salane5 afld (ringe t>e"e~ls 001.950 901.9',0 191.230 55<1,511 345,3)9 til.71'l1.

OP"'''I,nQ e"p.m.... 4lJ.134 462&1 11.340 26.635 _____17.&19 61.87..,

948,084 948,234 __ 202,570 ____ ""~5.246 :lSI.eM 61,72%

Human R...murc ....

Salan... and fringe bMenl. 1.5104.680 J~.007 1,1)'}5.901 466,773

Op....-aUng expenses 161.616 34.1 49 61.069 BO,547

1,746,2% ol.J4,016 1.H6,~76 559.320 61.40%

Prowcu.ing Anorn...,.

Sa"ries and Iring.. bene~ls B,I4lJ.9'"dI B,136,958 l,IOO.261 ~,942,629 2,194,329 no)'l(,

Operating e>;p',,,,..,, 460.169 4&1,658 14lJ.lJO :116.701 141.955 69.16'10.

OP""'lm9 transl"r-, <JYI O~,OOO 37,000 10,048 1B.9~2 4V6""

",63.."127 '.634.614 6,Z1~.319 2,:155.236 72,72'10

Pu.chasing

Salalies and lr'o1ge ben<"fi" 1,177.929 246,El4e 707,1:1£ 470,797 &1,03%

OperaUng e><penses ..4,300 49,ooJ 135.247 89.149 80.27%

1.402,32~ 297,92~ 841,J79 5S9,94/; 6OW%

Regi..le< 01 0......

Salarie. and lringe benefits 1.426,005 ;}32,946 H7.&I~ 69.33%

OperatinQ e>:pense, 219.059 ___c,~~,B:l 138,125 l4,91%

1.646,124 I,U9,074 J~9,167 1,063,346 575.721 &1.97'10

ll\'uu'er

Salane. ilJld Imge bene~ls 1,956.1,7 1.956,127 495.146 1.37Q.502 576.605 705,%

up"."I;"'] e>:pen"". 133,430 1.)),461 31,19~ 53.830 49.63; 6261%

2,089,557 2,09i,594 ___626,262 70.03'10

4 101171".<011 4:52PIIII

Macomb Coonty. Michigan

Qua""'I)' Expen<ll.ure R"port

Qua"", En<lPd Seplember 30, 2011

fund; Gene,...1 Fund l[)o,; 31 y,,", End}. cl>nl;nuod

Mo.... Amen<lod om no IOverj Unde,

Description Bu<Jo;j"t Budgel Ac.ual Aclual Budget '" Utilized

Facilili.... ami Operatloos

S3lane, and ftir,ge benef;ls 6.e36.Z'l4 <>.835.294 1.519,033 4.5,1.825 2.314.469 66.14~

Qper"Ung expen'e. 8.007.915 B,1Y;9B3~ 1.657.258 ~,'}49.177 3.120,5132 ,,= C"pi\al """")' 26,:llJ'5

------26,055 '" 9'105%

14,844,209 !~.932,438 3.196.111 9,497,O~7 5~5.381 63.60·...

Public """,,o1<s

Salarie, and Jring" bene!ils 4.211<.533 4.670.576 1,195.953 ~.424.2n 1,246.353 7331%

Ope,,,tlng eXf'''ns". 25",780 279.173 91.090 173.562 105.711 62 15~

4.551,31l 4,949,149 1,287.043 3,591.885 1,J52.(>64 12.69%

lItSU E~I"""ion

SaI..ori.,. ,.,d fmge be<1,,~I, 756.!169 7!>6,%9 167.732 467.753 2M.2'G 6179%

Opoe<3\ln9 ""P"'l.es 170,479 170,518 45.404 114,404 !>6,11' 6/.09%

n1,448 927,485 213.116 582,151 l45,na 62.71%

Planning & Econ DeYeloop

5"1"",,. and Imge be",,!ls 2.190-'90 2.3ooDl)~ 539,14<4 1,5J3.~1 164.728 56.75'l1.

Oper<JI.in9 expen..., 221,273 21~'.l8O 32.051 1:>5,0!l0 >\4,290 6158%

capital ""II")' 1,573 '" '" "~ 47,2l~

2,411,763 2.521,022 511,9~a 1.611.114 8-49,848 66.29%

Plat Boar<!

Qperali"ll expen"", '000 '.000 '.000 OOO~

1,000 1,cao 1.000 Q.OO·...

Ci~i. s......ice C<>mm

Ope,al<1g ~Xf'ef1.es 17,:<50 17,250 '"' 2,521 1~,729 1~.&1%

17,250 17.250 '" 2.521 14.719 14.61% ----~-

Sllerit{

s...t..,.;., and fringe beoeMs 48.447.29:l 46.278.5'75 12.350,078 3:1.072,352 15,7[)I'j.223 GBSO'l(,

Op"'aMg "'l'ef1ses lQ.1i2T7~2 10,8&Ul'?9 2. \01.327 6,100,732 4.781.~67 5&09%

Capital ""~")' ~,832 ~,832 13,094 13.095 71,737 15.44%

59,459,867 59.25t ,506 14.480\-,49' 19,1it2,17' 20,059,317 £6_15%

CO,," Building Salety

Salaries and frin\/'" ben".rils BOO,9~6 802.748 221.815 626.347 '76,401 7803%

Operating expense<

Cap'laI ""~")'

lB.57Q

."" lB.510

'.~

7.2&' 12.~39 5,631

1.Joo

69 6~%

0.00%

820,1'6 822,618 2H,076 639,2a6 18~.1J2 17.71'11.

Emergency Management

Salanes and fringe t>ondll. 227.070 n7,070 S9,640 169.0~ 57.006 H.46~

Op.....ling e'l''''''''' 22,323 30,437 \ 1.'54 12,711 7 .726 74.62%

249,193 251,507 10,194 191,195 65.712 14.48%

5

"acomb Coun~, Mlcl\i~an

Quart..rly Expenditure R"port

Quarter Ended September 30, 2011

Descrtpl.ion

Techn;nl S .......ic...

Salafie. and /ling.. benefils

0\>"",t"'9 "'penses

F&OSeeuri~

Sol""... ",,<I fn1ge benefits

Ope!alln~ expeo.es

Water Qualify Board

l)p",aM~ "xpen.... ,

Health .. Comm""ify S""'ices

Salaries ~n<l fn1ge benefits

Operal1ng ">;l..nses

Cap,l,. OU"~

Approprial'Gns

Salarie, ",,<I fringe benefi""

Operating exp..,-,ses

Capltat ouuay

Operallng uan""" ~u!

Con'rlbu';ons

Oroeraling tr.>O>f,.,-, oul

•

Fund' Gene...1 Fund (Dec 31 Yea, End)_ concluded

AdoJll"" Amended oro Bunget Budgel Actual

638,249 638,249 151,~\l6

4O,M2 40,941 12,611

678,nl E79,190 180.107

448,123 ~46,tn , 15.099

,= ,= 2,793

4~1,18~ 4:i7,'U '17.892-----

.,48' 4 .481

4,Ul 4.U'

125,793

1~, 100

,= ------".4.~93 -----

M1.6~B 600,9~7 (09)

'.~~.l.~OO 1,5B.2M 235,840

~7~,ClJO J15,OCO ,t25

~."" ~.=

2.~80,1~ 2,S67,16~ 216,876

~,40',776 56.565,608 $)51

Sl;.4.Bl.776 56,~6~,fi(l6 ~.351

'98,OS~.Oll 19~.24lt.)72 S 13,460.179 •

ITO

Actual

4n.1;~

21,511

504,792

31[,,692

4.H19

l19,~81

m m

11.442

763,61 ~

100,397

~n.4:i1

64,599

6A,Ull

93,616.540

(o...e,) Und..,

Sudg..,

'61,074

1~.324

174,J98

132,431

4,877

Ql,308

• '04

4,104

'25.;9)

'5,100

''''' 144,8~3

5~7.51~

~09,5oo

184,603

~"" 1,621.7a~

56,500,909

56,SDO.~0'1

lQ~,631.A31

'4 U,il;,..d

74.76'4

57460,;.

74.32%

7045%

46.21'4

&~.H'"

841'll.

8.41'4

000_

0.00'l(,0_ 0.00%

,~-~~ ....... sa n%

0.00'"

J1,J2"'"

0.11'"

0.11'"

4.B.~~'"

6 lQ/17/2C1114.52PM

Macomb Counly, Mic.hlga"

Ouarterly Exp•..,di'u,e Repo"

Oua~ End<td S"J'I""'t>e, 30, lOll

Description

S"lari... ..,d fringe beI1efils

Op_ng exp""ses

Cllpilal .... ":or

, AdoJ'l"d

audgel

12.999.786

B.OO'.>.4n

1"',B91

Fund:

,

Health De""......"n! (Dec 11 Yea' End)

Ame"ded om BUd~' Actual

12.962,786 , 2.I:lti2W7

6,219.219 000,177

267,742 77.055

no Aclual

6.370.138

1,914.760

163,240

(Over) Unde,

Budge' , 4,5~2.648

4.304.459

1U<l.SOl

% U'iliz<td

54.57%

30 7\.'%

63,68%

, 19,101"&,156 19,469,747 , 3,920.209 , 10.453.'16 , 9,001,608 53.77%

Description

5alaries and Jmge benef,ls

Operating expen"",

Capilal ou~ay

InlereS! and lees

, Adopted

Budget

13.958,236

6,096,496

>00>00

47?.7,~9

Fund, .... r1h T e..'''Y (Dec 31 Year End)

Amend.., om Budge' Aclual , 13.153.2.'}ij , 3,429,S II

':l.051.4""5 1,449,935

1SO.00c (26.057)

479,7Cl'.l

, '" Ac'ual

9.711,4e3

5,044,645

22.205

(Over) Under

Budge' , ").... 1,753

'.001J.!j..~1

1<7,/95

4/9.709

% Utilized

lJB3'Jl,

5573%

1460%

0.00%

, 2UH.441 22,014,441 4.nJ.43i 14,77!.J]] , 6,056,108 54.n''!'

7 1(lf1T12011 4:52 PM

Macomb C""nty, Michigan

Q~ar'l.e<iy Expendi'ure Repoort

Quarter Ended September 3D, 1-011

O-:ripllon

Salanes and lrin~e benefits

O...,.ating expen...,.

c"pllal M"I'

O"",allng tran.le" aul

,

Fund, SeniorCrtinn. Services (De<; 31 Year End)

Adopted Amended OW

Budget Budget Actual

1.44.4.,79, , 1.#4,792 316.069

264,7SO 267,057 :n,:J.46

,~

"~ 6.6?9

, 1,711,542 , 1,7!5olJ,4J4 , H',~11 ,

[)ncnplion

SaIM". and fringe be""~l<

Operalin] "xpense.

Capilal "'-'BoO)'

, Adop'ed

BU"gel

64:1.107

4,U63

J5,ClJO

Fund: V"",,,,n< Affa;.. (Dec 31 Year End)

Amended OW

BUdget At"'a'

64:1.107 , , 3/.579 , ~n.763 6) .!IOol

35.0CJ0

, 1,Ioo,8TO l,1oo,8TO , 205,3U

no Actual

699,854

63,324

'"

98J,~95

no Actual

3IB,Ola

214.5/5

928(1

601,883

lOve'lUnde,

Budget 'k Ulilizad , 544,938 62.26%

203,7lJ 2903%

9,569 3.20%

B,679 0.00%

, r~~,9J9 51>. IS'/'

lOve') Under

Budget , 2&4,079

2W,11l8

25,720

, ~9ll,987

% U,i,'ized

Sij67%

~.64%

26.511\

501.61%

8 1011112011 ~:52 1'101

M"comb CO<.IfI'ty, Michlg""

Q"an~rtv Ex~drtu", Repon

Quane' Er>ded SeptH71t>.<- 3D, 2011

~scrip~on

5.1I"nes and Inng" benefit.

Op....ahng ""!,,,nse, •

A~Opled

BudgM

TIl,676

1<6,324

Fund: Ad"lt Drug Cou" (Sep 3D Yea, En~)

Amended om '"" Budget Actual Act"al

• 98,271 24,<90 • 91,008

,,8,324 25.121 M,322-------

(0...,) Unde'

Budget

• 5,163

40,002

% UtlliZed

9-I,n'll.

6Bll3%

• 2W,OOO • 226,H5 49,401 • 181,410 • H,tU 80.(11;%

Descnp1lon

Sa...';e, and r,-y,(l<' !>en<!lil'

Dpera"ng ""Pense.

~11Bl ""hy

•

Adopte<1

Budget

9.9t4,5191

17,892,679

10,000

Fund, Child Ca", Fund (See 30 Yea' Endl

Am..nded om BUdgo~t AClual

• 10.(162,655 2,493,740 • 17,690,24::1 2,7J8,770

10.000 2,542-----

'"" Adua!

9,238,04<1

9,'<04,411

8.$49

ID"",) Unde,

Budge'

• [SU.611

7,785,B32

1A~'

% Utilize"

91.62%

5599%

e5A9%

• 27,811,670 • H,782,898 5,235,052 • 19,151,004 • 8,6Jl,894 68.93%

DesCription

S"ane. and lringe beneMs

Ope"","g e~p"".es

C:ap<IBl ou~ay

•

Fund' Community Coo,e.olions (Sep )(l Year End)

Adopted

Budgel

117,468

602.675

, 000

•

Amonded

642.765

674,510

,~

om Aclu,,1

$ 170,659

191.569

J~O

Aclual

659.~

63-3,324

,W

$

(Ove,) Unde,

Budge'

(17 ,07B)

4l.186

e~

% Ulili."d

102.66%

9J.~"%

35.00%

• 1,321,143 l,Hl,Sl1 , 24,751!

9 1(Y17flOTI ~:52P~

Salanes and IrInge b.mefil.

Operating '"1''''''''' c.oP;'o/ QUU"'!

Descripticn

SalarieS and fnnge benefits

~atin9 e"Jl""'ses

Cap;"'looU",!

Opera1ing Itansl",. ""I

lIlaccmb County, Miclligan

Quarterly Expend',lu,e Report

Quarte, Ended Sepleml>e' 30, 2011

Fund' Community MenLoI Healt~ (Sep 30 y .... , End)

Amended QTO

Budgel AClual Actual , 25,9'l1.1n 13.<2S,S3<l $ 5,979,165 , 22,812.050

168.429,~IB 1)1,741.120 37,817,\).16 140,89'9.410

95 )()() ____c'c.'~',791 31,445 141,762

, 194,515.895 195,2o.l,4-45 $ 43,83<1,2f>l. 163,95~.U2

Fund' Commun.ty Services (Sep ~o Yea, End)

Adopted Amended 0'0

Budge' Budget Actual Ac'ual 8.162,505 , 7.630,OO~ $ 1,~75.O'JI , 7.515,510

9.5i'Q.W9 10.:J.51.009 2.213,111 9,756.936

7,215 96.0<>1 90,012 95,836

101.887 1~,695 ~.~ 146,695

, 16,792,61l6 lB,n-J.B69 3,111,20-4 , l1,51~.919

(0.-0'> UndeT

Budget

4t~,484

:J(I,741,710

9'9,O~9

31.255,223

IQver) Unde,

'"""""."' __ $ 114,'!l8

5\14.163

U9

, 108,890

981<%

82 10"'"

58.87%

8l.99%

"I. Utilized

98,5O'lb

\14 28%

"9,76%

lOO,Q(J%

96,11"1.

10 1(1(17/2011 ~.52 PM

"'acomb Caunty, Micl>l~an

Quartarfy E~pet'ldil.....e Report

Quarter Ended Septem~, JO. 1011

Ad"p!~

Fund; Road.

Amended

(Sep JO Year End)

OW no (O..e<) Under

Desc,iplion

Sa"";.,. and Imge benefits

O~~nQe~se.

Cap,!al ou~ay

Budget

3(1,699,685

52,214.479

1,412.4$1

, Budget

29,IM.426

J~.:>65.292

1.5'4,6&4

Aclual

, 5,993.125

16.955,836

4~' .$lll

Aclual

M.6(P9.l;l:J.4

:l.Il,OI6,498

, ,632,ooe

, BUdget

2.5'>8.~n

1.34B'~

(51.~ 14)

" Utilized

9123%

9657%

lP365%

= ~4,J~6,6!& , 10,108,402 2J,WJ,5oCl"!... 66,258,4JO 3,8.i9,912 ')4.51·"

o..cription

Sol_s and r""ij<l benefits

Oper..mg expense.

CapitalouU...,.

, "dopted

B"dg<>l.

890.679

7.961,606

f'md: Substanc., Abuse (Sep]O Yea' End)

Amended OW

!Judl/e, Actu~1

890.679 , 223,237 , 6.110.149 1.349,o;e1

2.515

no Attual

627,895

5.264.3111

2,515

(O...er) Unde,

Budget , 62.71J4

2826.36a

12.515)

"llo lItilizad

92.95%

li5.15%

100 00"'"

, ~,l5l,US 9,001,421 , U75,]13 , 6.114,791 1,&86,631 H.t3'"

11 1CV17ml I 4;s.2 PM

RECYCLABLE PAPER

~. RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: _

AGENDAITEM: _


RESOLUTION TO Review Ordinance (#8) Regarding Comprehensive Budget forthe General, Special Revenue and Enterprise Funds for Fiscal Years Ending December 31, 2012 and December 31,2013



PRELIMINA.RY

BUDGET

FOR FL"iDS WITH FISCAL YEARS E"iDI:\G DECEMBER 3J, 2012 .\:\D 2013

''''''''''''.''' -_..". , ... ,.~ "._." .

SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 ..~=""~. "'0'.' •

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTORY SECTION PAGE

Budget Letter .. . ..... A-1

Budget Timeline . ..A- 3

Budget Ordinance and Notice of Adoption .. _. _____ .A- 4

SUMMARY SCHEDULES

Summary of Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures By Fund .. _. . B-1

Summary of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund BalancesAll Funds Summary By Category .. ... 8 - 2

Summary of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund BalancesAll Funds Summary By Funclion .. _____ .8- 3

Summary of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund BalancesAll Funds Summary By FuncLion By Delail ....B-4

Statement of Budgeted Revenues. ExpendiLures and Changes in Fund BalancesIndividual Funds By Category - Year Ending December 31. 2012 _ ............ 8- 5

StatemenL of Budgeted Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund BalancesIndividual Funds By Category - Year Ending December 31, 2013 . . B-8

GENERAL FUND SCHEDULES

General Fund Detail By Category - All Departments. .....C- 1

General Fund Detail By Function ·-AII Departments .. , .. C - 2

General Fund Revenues By Type and Department.. . .. C-3

General Fund Expenditures By Type and Department.. " ... C-7

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

GENERAL FUND SCHEDULES (continued)

General Fund Budgetary Centers: Apportionment Commission Board of Commissioners. Building Authority , __ Charter Commission __ Circuit Court . Civil Service Commission., County Cleric Corporation Counsel .. County Executive Court Building Safety .. District Court Romeo_. __ District Court New Baltimore .. Department of Human Services District Court Witness Fees ... _ Elections. , Equalization .. _ Emergency Management._ Facilities & Operations._ Family Counseling __ Finance .. Health Department Health & Community Services. __ Human Resources & Labor Relations .. Information Technology., Jury Commission., Juvenile Court. Law Library,_ MSU Extension Probate Court - Mental Division Probale Court - Wills & Estates Planning & Economic Development.. Pial Board_,. Probation - Circuit Court., Probation - District Court. Prosecuting Attorney __ Public Affairs Purchasing .. Public Works. Reference & Research Center __ Register of Deeds __ Reimbursement, __ Risk Management.

PAGE

.................C-9 . C -10

.... C - 11 .. C -12 . C-13

........ C -14 ...... C- 15

.. C- 16 ........ C-17 , " .... C-18

...... C -19 ... C - 20

..... _... C-21 .... C -22 .... C - 23

, .....C - 24 .... C- 25 .... C-27

........ C -28

.." .... C-29 C-30 C - 34

. C - 35

. C - 36 , ..... C - 37

... C- 38

.... C- 39 ... C -40

..... C -42 ..... C -43

." C-44 .. C -45 .... C--46

. ....... C - 47 ... C -48

....... C- 50 .... C- 51

.. C -53 C - 55

." ...... C-56 C - 57

_ C - 58

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)

GENERAL FUND SCHEDULES [continued)

General Fund Budgelary Centers (continued): Security. , Senior Citizen Services., Sheriff.. Technical Services __ Treasurer's Office.. Water Quality Board.. Non-Departmental. Operating Transfers., Appropriations _

SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS

Community Corrections .. Community Services Agency .. Department of Human Services .. _ Health Department .. __ Health Grants .. Law library .. _ Michigan Works Reference & Research Center ... ROD-RemonumenLation ,_ ROD-Technology Fund. Revenue Sharing Reserve .. Senior CiLizens Services. Veterans Services ..

ENTERPRISE FUNDS

Martha T. Berry Medical Care Facility .. Parks & Recreation

DEBT SERVICE

Debt Service ..

PAGE

.. C - 59 ..... C - 60

C - 62 C - 67

,.", _... C-68 . ,.. C -69

. C - 70 ... C - 71

,.... C - 72

. .0 - 1 . 0- 2

..... 0-4 ... 0 -5 0-9

................ .0-11 ........... .0 - 12

..._0-13 .0 - 16

.." .. D-17 , 0 -18

. D -19 ... _..0 - 22

E - 1 ......E-4

....F - 1

Macomb County Executive Mark A. Hackel

/>-!<lrk F. l)p}(]in DepU[1 County E"eCllli\"

September 3D, 2011

Chairwoman Kathy Vosburg and Macomb Count~ Board of Commissioners One S Main, 91 Floor Mt. Clemens, MI. 48043

Re: Macomb County BUdget for the General, Special Revenue, and Enterprise Funds For Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2012and 2013

As the County Executive, the Charter requires me to prepare and administer a comprehensive balanced budget in a manner which assures coordination among agencies. Section 8.6.' of the Chaner requires that the budget be transmitted at least 90 days before the next fiscal year begins and specifies the minimum content for the budget document. Since each of the agencies contained in the attached budget have fiscal years beginning on January 1, the budgets are being transmitted prior to October 1. It should be noted, however, for reasons that will be explained later in this letter, this document has been labeled a "Preliminary Budget."

Similar to the September 2012 and 2013 year end budgets that the Commission approved, you will notice that the budget format has been redesigned from prior years. This has been done to provide greater amounls of information and transparency to both decision makers and the public. Some of the major improvements include:

• This budget presents a two year forecast of both revenues and expenditures compared 10 the single year forecast in prior years

• This budget provides for a five-year trend comparison for revenues and expenditures as opposed to the prior three-year presentation

• The Summary of Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures By Fund individually lists the revenues and expenditures for each Fund along with the projected changes for each fund balance, rather than aggregating them into a single change in fund balance

• As in the past Revenues are presented by category, but Expenditures are now presented 1) by category, 2) by function, and 3) by line item which will allow for greater understanding of the purpose of e8ch expenditure

• Staffing levels provided are for a five-year trend comparison, as opposed to the prior three-year presentation. They are now summarized by position type, which shows the nature of the human resource allocations within each fund and separated by program rather lhan aggregating them into a single total.

• Finally, while expenditures are presented Jar approval in the traditional line item format, they are also summarized by "Service" within each fund, which provides a beller explanation of how the budget allocations will be used.

Not only will this redesigned format provide decision makers and the public with greater information and transparency. it will also reduce the need for long narrative explanations of why the funds are being requested. By presenting the budget in this fashion. the numbers have a greater ability to "speak for themselves."

A ,

The Need for a Preliminary Budget

The Charter is clear in its requirement that the Executive prepare and Iransmit a "comprehensive balanced budget" ninety days before the start of the next fiscal year. While this document satisfies that requirement, il is unlikely that it will be the final budget for the 2012 fiscal year. This year is unique in many respects and it makes budget forecasting at this point in time very difficult. For example, like all governmental entities, the majority of expenditures are for human resources. But since the County is currently in negotiations with 24 bargaining units, it is impossible to accurately forecast the resulting wages, salaries and benefits. Compounding this is recently enacted legislation that mandates the employer and employee contributions to health care. Again, the financial impact of this legislation is yel unknown. Other legislation being considered in Lansing would place additional mandates on municipal employers and employees. Taken together, these factors can impact the budget by several million dollars.

Given this unprecedented level of uncertainty, the budget being presented to you represents a form of worst case scenario. It demonstrates that if the County 1) achieved no employee concessions Or other forms of savings during negotiations, 2) realized no savings from the recently enacted health care cost sharing mandates, 3) filled all currently budgeled positions, and 4) achieved no savings from organizational consolidations or restruclurings, that the budget would still be balanced, although the fund balance would be consumed by the end of 2013. As a resull, my office and the Finance Department Will continue to review the departmental budget requests with an emphasis on determining if services can be provided in a more cost effective and efficient manner. We win also work to incorporate accurate estimates of wage and benefit savings as they become known. All changes will be brought to your

. attention once they are finalized and in time for you to give final approval to the 2012 budget before the beginning of the fiscal year. Please find attached a proposed timeline for this year's budget process.

As always, should you have any questions, do no! hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

~A~ Mark A. Hackel Macomb County Executive

One South :'Il<lin 8'h Floor' Mt. Clemens, r-,lichi~,ln -HW-H * Phone (:jHG) -lG9·/00] Fa.'\ (:'i86) -l69-/25/

A 2

9/30/2011

10/1/2011

'011/6/2011

11/7/2011

11/8/2011

11/22/2011

121512011

12/13/2011

12/13/2011

12/15/2011

Macomb County, Michigan Proposed Budget Timeline December Year End Funds

Fiscal Years Ending 2012 and 2013

Preliminary budget submission to Board of Commissioners

Finance to meet with budgetary centers to modify preliminary budget where necessary

Proposed budget submission to Board of Commissioners

Budget discussion- Finance Committee

Budget discussion- Finance Committee

Deadline to post notice of public hearing

Public hearing

Budget discussion and Finance Committee approval

Final budget approval- Full Board Meeting

COUNTY OF MACOMB

ORDINANCE NO.---.8'_

AN ORDINANCE TO ADOPT A COMPREHENSIVE BUDGET FOR THE GENERAL, SPECIAL REVENUE, AND ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND DECEMBER ]1, 201]

THE COUNTY OF MACOMB ORDAINS:

SECTION I.

This ordinance shall constitute the appropriations ordinance in accordance wilh Section 8.6.1 of the Home Rule Charter of Macomb County (the "Charter"), and in accordance with the provisions of Public Act 2 of [968, as amended by Public Act 621 of J 978. (the "Uoifono Budgeting Act"). 1I is the respon"ibility of the County Exeeutive of the Charter C~'unly of Maeomb (the "n1unty"') to prepare a cl1mprehensive balanced hudge! and the Macomb County Board of Commissioners 111 adopt the balanced budget and an approprialions ordinance.

SECTION 2. The Code of Ordinances shall include the following:

1. The hudget is hereby adopted as contained in the 3llached document for the Gener<.ll Fund, Special Revenue, and Enterprise Funds for fisc<.ll years ending Decemher 31. 2012 and December 31, 2013,

2. The County Exeeutive shall have authority to transfer funds as foll(l\Vs (i) from or to any line ilem within each or the budget<lry t:cnters in an amount up to thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) or t\\'O percent (2%), whichever is less, of tbe hudgel in that budgetary center and (ii) to or from any line item fpr internal service costs between the budgetary eenters. Multiple related expenditures shall be aggregaled <.lnd subject to the limitation of thirty thousand dollars ($30,O{J0) 01 two percent (2%), whichever is Jess for each budget year.

3. Appropriations will be deemed maximum authorization to illcur expenditures and not a 1l1Llndatc to spend.

4. For 2012 and 2013, the General Opcnlting ~1jllage Rate is set at 4.5685 Mills and the voted Veterans Millage is set at OJ)4 milL

5. For 2012 <lnel 2013, the Cigarette Tax Rcvenue from the MichigLln Department of Treasury is 10 be utilized in a(;cllrd<lnce with P.A 264 as amended by P.A 529 of 1998 as follows:

a. Twelve Seventeenths (12/ 17ths) is to be utilized by Ihe Health Department for the funding of exi ... ting or new health related programs as ontlined in P.A. 264.

b. Five Seventeenths (5/17ths) is to be utilized in the Sheriff Department Jail Operations.

6. For 2012 and 2013, the Liquor Tax Revenue from the Mi~higan Department of Treasury is 10 be utilized in accordance ...... ith P.A. 106 of 1985 designating Fifty Percent (50%) to be used for Suhstance Abuse programs.

SECTION 3.

This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication of a notice of adoption.

This ordinance W<l:, adopted at a meeting of the Macomb County Board of Commissioners on Ihe __ day of_____ .2011.

KATHY D. VOSBURG, Board Chair

O'CC;A-;RC;'\-;lE;CL;-L;-A~S-;A~B~\UGH,County Clerk

COUNTY OF MACOMB

Ordinance No: _--<Jl?'---__

NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE

The County of Macomb has adopted an ordinance which approves the General, Special

Revcnu..::, and Enterprise Fund budgc1s lix fiscal years ;;:nding December 3 (, 2012 and December

J 1,2013. The ordinance shall be effective upon publicalirm of this Notice of Adoption. A copy

of the ordinance can be inspected or obtained from the Oflicc of the Counly Clerk during nO/mal

business hours. An declronic version will be available on the Macomb County Website

http:,i,'v.'\VW .macomhcountymi. gOY,""finance!reno rtsdocu Inents. htm.


Summary of Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures By Fund

Fiscal Year Ending Decemoor 31, 2012

Revenues and E~pendjluresand Fund Balance

Fund Other SOIJrces Other Uses lrocr (Deer) Beginning Ending

General Fund , 192.*15,310 , 208,563.Ml • 115,1'1',531) • 46,137,899 , 30,0'9,368

Special Revenue Funds

Communily C"rreCliDnS 109,949 69,949

CommlJn,;ly Se"'ices 253,:':8u 386,255 11.12,9%1 318,130 185,135

Der~rtm~nlor Human Se""ces 97,482 (97.4821 97,482

Healih D~par1menl '.501,7315 (',501,736) 1,501,736

Heallh Granls 904,997 '.025,697 ('20,900) 321,497 200,597

U'" Llbr,1ry '4,930 (14,990) '4,980

Michigan Worksl 4,120,104 4,'201Q~

Reference & Re,~,"rh Cenle, 545,O6~ (545,064) )45 06~

Register 01 Deed, Technal'Jgy Fund 700.000 700.000 ~ 9%,25~ 2,998,254

Remonumenl"II~"Fun<j ;:'[lD.OOO 200,000

Revenue S"ar",,< R"s~r\l~ F'Jold 4,856,883 IU56,I'I'1j 4.856,883

Senior Ciblcn, S,.rvlces 24,786 12.t,78;;i 24,786

Veler"ns' Afblrs 1063,9H 1,063,977 953,883 ,;l~,3.8g3

Enlerprise Funds

Fr€~dom Hill Park 262,507 322 ,~~7 (60,0001 796,622 736,6::2

Mar1ha T Berry Medical Care Fac'i1lly 22,303,151 :;',"03,1~1 2,02~,5g1 2.02~,~81

Debt S..rvice Fund 7,147.636 8,2'J~,7~6 (1.147,130) ~,99J,412 3.846,282

, 229,470.891 , 154,091,,158 • 124,620.4(7) , 65C,~'J229 , 40,9M.732

fisc.al Yur Ending Decemoor 31, 2013

Revenues .and Expendilures and fund Balallce

Fund Other Sources Other Uses Iller (Deer) Beginlling Endiny

General Fund , 180,971,161 , ~11,1!';7,207 , 130,886,046) , 30.019,368 , (e66 <;78)

Sp"dal Revenue FUllds

Communlly CorrecHons 71.597 11.597

Cummunllv Se"'ices 253.260 387.499 (134.2~'Ji 1~'),135 5O,89b

He"llh Gr,,~I~ 543.416 611,316 (67,!:tuu) 200,597 132,697

Micr"9~n WN".' ~,1:01O-1 ~,120,104

Re9i"l~r 01 o ..,,~~ T"'Chnology Fund 700,000 70Cl,OllO 2,'398.25~ 2,998.2tA

R~rnon"rnenWII~n Fund 200,000 200rJOO

VClcmn,' Mf~", , (I~3,OGO 1.0-13.CltiO 953,883 J53.883

Enterprise Funds

Freedom Hill Park 262507 322.507 1130,000) 736,(;21 676,1322

MGrtha T. Berry Medlc"l Care F"r1iJly 23,257,271\ :3.257,278 2,024c.91 2024,591

Debt Service Fund 7,206.7u8 8,101,688 (89~,980) 3 Ntl,282 1%1.302

, 218,629091 , 250.672,256 $ 132,043,1G~) $ 40.964.732 • 8,921.557

B ~ 1


Statement of ReV<lnues, E:o;penditures and Changes in fund Balance

An Funds Summary By Calegory

Fiscal Ye;tr Ending D\!cember 31

Audile. BU<l~.led

Revenues:

P,ope"yTa,es

l"'''",e. I:. Permit'

C"~'ge' 'v ~.r"ce.

In"">,moo,ln",,me

"ne, & Forie;'ures

R"mhu,..,·emenls

10d,,"CI Co", Allocallon

Oln., Re"enue

2009 Aclual

139,4TO,381

',321002

14,9QB,551

~~,O83,580

2,533,9}6

'~~,75(l

6.:;JlT.Ue

g :e2 °iYJ

"",,~6

2010 AClu.t

'27,'J7~."'0

I.• ,,7. 17"

11 'J';9.~D

"','-"1+17

f .U':,~.I;;;

7~9.61'

1,538,201

1O.524.S28

418.831

2011 Amended

'T';'~81.849

',381 901

IA.1J8,234

~2,~5,403

:1,178,719

8S9,500

7458104

~ ("8.912

,~g.<g~

20'~

Rec""''''ended

1(t'),7Ll7 :~:

414.400

2033.23 0

.01,099.680

473.2)0

813.827

8,0%,%~

8.'91,niJ

32i,ilclS

2013 Reo"",,,,ended

107,513.601

41 0,400

22.J57,591

~ ho,"'~

'-.4~.020

" T~.'QrJ

'J. T)',.~'J3

~ ('J'.V8

:127,:,;)5

Total Revenue. ,:m ''''i.<';' 219.171.07,' 'Q;»l."~' 283.957,761 2U2.702.""

Expendi'u",s,

Po,sonnel

Suppl;es & SE-r"""

Room & E"~,~

Conre'ffi,eo';' Ir",o,ng

U.',I.,es

~.pa"s & MalNenance

·'.'en,cle Op.'a"Qns

Contract Se<V;ces

Inte'nal Se'Vices

CaPllalOutiay

Debl Se"',ce "P,,~clpal

'" 567077

3<1.22.0.709

39,821

4 4UB.JO~

3.135.7<1

we~""

1;.IT7,g61

ci.38~.337

TlI,5}3

~,585,DOlJ

2.o~2.86/

112,611 Ho

~'~ :;~ 1,74,

'Mj',l' , :CO,<I.1

:; >; "J 'i~<

>'JJ <;':8

,,,0"6."~

74RO,"'8

7U~.6B4

5.1G5.090

2708.:;12

'.",67>1 <S,

2o,,7<,Bi2

150,:;66

4,870,331

3,2M,B3--1

1.1£7.860

lb.605.3S9

6700,5-5-1 , 11~,OOI

o.n20.00U

:: ~\1.·r8

147,671.1111

2'.%'.49~

20£285

'.~"" O~2

3 l,~l, ,~)

, ," '" 11.f;;" n~"

b 04'J 1';9

no,1" S:'V({k)

2.'9r F~

151,329,0",

2•.945,:;~S

17~ ,~~

&."-'3. ; 17

3,754,33,

, 146.%4

11,687 ~87

6.617974

~OUO!

5.~1l'.OOO

2,,67,2.0

210.428.2~O 197.681MI 2,).~r.H"" "Og,"'0.03~ ~1~ 7;:2,7~3

Reo.nu •• 00 ... l!Jnderl e.pendilu,es ___rY.ao~S80 71 ,~8'Hl1 ___,_~.JilI.')~1i 1.5,:;~L.2iE) I l'-inRnQ461

Othe. Fi".nc,n~ SOU"•• (Use.):

r,ao,("" ,n· G"o"'at Fund

T,,,n,fe" In - Olh", Funds

T'an,l.rs ,out

1I.~>1 ~::'

',l,I";'.41-'

r7".~lJ~.~(jc"

14,808.;)49

" 760.96<

169,350.8231

'8,OJ~,50Q

3-3.127.530

(73.364.2:;;'

I 21~J,8M

18.213.<96

'" r: , ~..,.; )

r ~?1 ", ~ <'So ,l,1J

(37,8a9.~C,cl

Tol.1 Olh., ~in.noin9 S<>urce, (U... I (21,2('S,4;1;,' 12:1 781.O1?) (2<.2C'O.1><i :1"-n~ll9) ,71,963,119)

Nel Inc,eas" IOecrease) If, Fu,," b",,~(.

Fund Balanoo, 5cg,nnong 0' Har

(7 J'W.51g)

101.856.500 " 291 ..';79)

'~H~.f.06'

(17'>8l)<.1.1

gJ '00.·1".

r·,4.(j~(J.49!)

___o_~ ~~~,22~j

132,043 165)

40.""",7:;2

94.45/).0[1 ~', 1%4~, 05,,';B5.229 , 40,nt;" 7:<2 , ~.821,567

B·2


Statement of Revenues. Ellpendilures and Ch.1Inges in Fund Balance

All Funds Summary By Function

Fiscal 'fear Ending December 31

Re.enues:

Pro~e"y Taxes

Licenses & Pennil'

Inlergo.ernmenlal

Charges IN Se""""s

Inveslm...-,l "'c~me

Fin"" & Forle'lur~,

~elmbursemenls

Indlrecl CoSI Allocallon

01her Revenue

rOlal Re.enues

,

Audited

2009 Actual

1~9,470,3B' , 1",',114:l

'4,9'l6,551

55,08.3,560

2,5.33,976

lM,750

6,330,146

9,2B2,590

4114,2~6

lJO,"9~,:lG4

2010 .... ctual

127.975,910

1,427.173

17,339,540

52,n4,~~7

1,051,167

7~9,617

1,536,201

IO,"7~,9B

~ 1~,63'

219,171,014

,

2011 Amended

115A6Ul49

UB1,901

16,:1J6,:l3~

52:i65,~03

2,176,779

659.500

1,451<,104

B,618,~12

409,299

lG7,291,981

Budgeled

1012 Ro;;;gmmended

, 109,707,757

~1J,400

22HJ,',,",

53,D99.138G

473.270

813,~n

~,095.958

8.291.730

327,905

?03,957,761

""Ro;;;ommended

, HI/,SUMI

414,400

22,357,591

54,295,949

545,020

818,400

B,136,503

B,~93,37e

)21.'J05

~O~,102.7~7

hpendilur....

L""l"ial,ve

Judlc'al

General Governmenl

Pubhc Safely

Pubhc Works

Heallh & We~are

Rea-eallon & Culll,fe

C,,'rll~1 Oull'l

O~bl S"",rc~ - P""clral

Dtbl "ier"c~- Imeresl & Fees

Tolal Expen~jIU(e5

Re.enues Over (Un~el) Ex""ndilures

Olher Fln.nci"l1 Sou,ces (U$@$j,

1ransre~ '" . Gen~ral ,,,old

lransr~" I" _Olher Fund.

7,.",fe·so<,1

rel.1 O'he, Financing Sources (U~e'l

Nel Increase <,P"ue"e) ,n Cund Balance

Fund Bala"(~, B~~'n""g or Year

Fund Bal'r>u. E,,~ "I Y~ar >

1 ,985,609

31,622,030

~6,934.811

62,r~3,(I4B

~,~T6 '11

51J~2,5J9

2,214,236

721573

4,585,000

2,882,1l67

210,42B,284

19,866,930

\7,597,927

J2,042,~34

(16,905,860)

127L65~~~\

171~6,of9)

101,6St3,5ll(I

94,458,061 ,

',,~71,825

30]~5,219

:;6919,522

57,~06,455

4,700,272

54,:M4,653

1~~SB99

7DB.t.8-4

5,16'iOUU

2,706,JI2

197661,(141

21,~89,433

14,~OB,1l-19

31,700,962

1693508231

(22.781,012)

(1.291,579)

94,456,061

93,'66,45. ,

1,393,671

,0,90S,79}

4),B3&,~~;

&1,46;,810

5.~llJ.lB6

~9,259,651l

1.477,863

1,115,001

5.620.000

2,511,408

<'<,673,1)4,

(5,381.061)

18,036,509

33,127,536

173,364,2371

(22,200,1<;2)

il7 ,)61263)

9J,'~6,462

65,585,229

1,-'~ll~0

31,311,6~:'

~5,672.619

G3,778,536

5,B56,768

51,851,411

543.J58

775.957

5.6'0.000

2291,776

209,340,039

15,382,27BI

1.210.834

16,233,296

(4~,751,349)

___119,23&,21~)

(2~N049n

65,"'0,<.'8

, ~~ 'lO-',n:l

1,412,13,

32,212.!t7&

~6,~OO,4M

t>l~93,359

5969,326

52.681 '"' 546,]20

301,207

5,910,Ol10

2,06;,;:40

21]18cI9]

110,080,O~6)

7,271,344

8,655,000

___"_7.B89A631

(21,96" \191

132,043, 16~)

~0%4J32

, 6.9?1.567

B· J

MACOMB COUNTY. MICHIGAN

Statemenl of Revenues. Expenditures ilnd Chilflges in Fund Balance

All Funds Summary By FunctiQn By Detail

Fiscal Year Ending DecemberJ1

Audited Budgeted

200~ 2010 2011 2012 ~Q1J

Actual Actual Amcroded Recommended RO'Commended

Lel/islatlve

General f'und 1.9~5,609 '.~71,82~ U93.O/1 1 J81,7,0 1.412,732

Judicial

(;<,n.,., Fun~ 31.59L512 30.318,222 30,814.'''0 'I.JI1,8:'2 32.212978

La .. L,b,.,y 30,4B 20.997 31 Oi'" GeneraI9"",a""nenl

G,"~,,, F"M 4'j 27',823 37 6lJ7 0.61 42,9<5.15' 4&,77761~ 45.~9H~0

Regl;1er of OeM, Technology Fund 1.402.327 1 1uO:J02 6~5,OOO 695,000 W~ aoo RemonomenlaliQn Fuo'd 2£0.661 2" ~';~ 198.301 ~'l'(l.o-JO :IOu UUO

Public Safety

General FuM 62,"79,359 ~U;"'Jg! 01.J99,~58 '0:0 7U".5,~' 64,621762

Community Correction, 14.~M "!3,05e 68.252 ~9 <;4, 11,597

Public .....orl<o

Gener~1 Fund • 8';7.<,5 ~,592.211 '.~'~ 714 5 !c9':~0 5.844,8'18

Opo, Sp",'<e ,','od 11B.~b 96,%1 n3.~7~ 126.9B8 12',~~a

H~~II~ /I, .....ell...

G"",~", F<Jnd 1.(;64 1 441 "~.374 2:;,149.027 ~J .~~,~~.

Comrnunolr Ser"ce, 1.13.\,·JO 3165.378 ~,H1J,2 326,255 3:',4\1')

Oep.r1m.n1 01 Hum.n 5efl'lces 2.400.691 ~.6~' 7:;9 3.012,''''

Healln O<>pof\menl

Heallh Gran!>

19.013,041

1.1~8,209

1~ 010.~~1

7-'" ,.I', 19119.B96

1.5300,421 , 024,397 ~10 ]1~

Manna T Berr, ""~d'ool C~'e ~"l'Mr 21614,881 "' C-'b.O";' 22.6e~,44' c2"~'o' 23129.2,8

M,chlgan Wor>o' 3,979.998 ,45;;.1" 1 &&67,645 , 1«) '"'" 4.120 '04

Senior Cit'ler" $"r·"oo, 1.0'" 801 1,·16< ,J~' 1 731.8"~

Veleran" MaIO' '0·1 ,~~" 783.370 I,OG~.8iO I.J~<.17r 1 OJ5,05Q

Rec,eation 1 Cullu,~

Geoe,,,1 Fund <2C-.3~1 225.813

'-.~"10m Hill Park <i36 <icc 313.043 ;:.,.507 32? 507 322 ~O,

Re,ealch & Reler,.,ce Center '.577,61. 1.1 '? 656 ,'~Q.J56

O~bl Service 1,467,B61

P"nClp.1 d,58o,OOO ~ ,~~.')oo 5.~NOOO 5.8ro.OOO '; 310,0300

Intec%I'" Fees 2,BB2867 2.iCJ~ 312 2,511,40a ".297 nr. 2.G672dO

Capl.al Dulloy 721.573 7%NI.1 1.I'~.0(j1 775.957 ~OU07

Total D_~lin\lbpend;(ures 217,8go"~' '~/',8',M1 212.~78NZ <O',340.G39 212JB." In

Trandets 0",

Ger>eral Fu"~ 50 ~1.441 53.2n ,·87 '0370.558 ')1,55D~03 JI,8,g.46'

Cornrn"",,y 5"""'cos 30,696 60.000 6".O~"

Depanm~nl of Human SO''' '"' ~7 '82

He"lih Departme"t 1.236 '" ,>, '> I.SQ1 '.It'

Hea~h Grants 188.8:,0

Law Library 14 \·~o

Researcn ~ Relerence C,o"r o~5,j6~

R";-e~uo Sh.""~ Reser',e FUM 16,090'07 16,048,311 16.18~,OGl' 4,S5G.SB3

~~'''o, I:.r"o"" :;e""ces SN" 3.264 B ~19 2&.786

10..1T,an.le•• 16.905.860 69.350.823 ;::UN 23; 4'7~1.:I49 17 8~9.'U

Total Expendi(~'e" 2~4.802.011 , ,'0; 03."6' 2~0,042.279 254.091.338 , <"Ii,6':'.'56

B· <

fll.ACOfllB COUNTY. flliCHIG.AN

SI.le"",nl '" BUdgeted Revenues. Expendilures and ChOllll"s in Fund Balance

Il'Idividu.1 Funds By Calegary

Fiscal Year Ending December 31. 2012

R.,~", & I.",~,",""

,,,,,'o" Sec,''''''

"..It" ~O",,"O"• So,.".,'"""

••v.n,,"

'''.980

'~"]"~'O""" ",u

4[!Q.OC~

, ) ))0.-" '-';

'0 , "4,2",01'

" '" ., '41 SO" ", COC '" ".'

'26 ,,'"

, ,i.e,'., ,,""',50'

5''''.'4' I ".,

(.''''''0,11,', ,,'''' D,", S""" "'.0"'''' no' if'

To'" E',.. . ,co "C' ," '" 507" '" '" '" ., "",S; I 122.''''

01'... ,,,,",,no Scu,o"I""')

" ,,' '" ".'" ,'.C ", '50 ,",,, "."'17'"

C '; '7 '.","""'2' ,"'50' ','" ''',I

, 141 10' '>0' ,',..., ',"C""" """"~"" '" '""" Sol'"" "0 "'"

" ·'~'.'9Y "1A ;," ____--C' ~,. '''''."''''

Foo' B,I,",", E"" d , ••,

B, S


Sialement 01 Budgeted Aevenues, Expenditu'es and Char>ges;n Fund Balance

Ind"iduol Funds By Category

Fiscal Yu, Endiltg Oecenlbe, 31, 2012

"",,.. T S.".,

Hum,. ~.,...... & H..""

G .. nU ,",0"'"L1''''Y

.'.1.2'2.'" 1.120104

00.'&l

"L~"'"

0"""", '''' '" 1.'"0

1He·,

, 25,'

""01 " ,,' X·.,

, 4(>0'''",,' s.""" ". 'CO

H·t>:

, '" 1""

'",,,f.,, ". '<om "t",' ",", "" ,,,,. 14 "'''

",1,"" _"'" 1 4'-' 0'.'" -----~,.,'"'

Food B.' d or Y ..

B-+3

MACOMB COUNT'(, MICHIGAN

State,nenl at Budgeli!'d Revenues, ExpeMitures aNI Ch~nges in Fund Balance

In<ljyidual Funds By Category

Fi"".1 Yu' Ending December 31, 2012

R......' '" "".o, ....."u. ,.,n,• S••,o, C",••,,'

• '.'0"".""""", ....~. ',no To",'

••,.n".,

1N5,'"

2M,"C~

F".." & '"'''0'''

'"'7'''

" .' , g' ,".,," ,",,,,,,, & S."'"" , DO'

, 001 "',',

1 ,'" ",

".'" ).,,(., <"''-'0'

'.64'0<1

'.207.'"

,"'" •• ,,,,d1'",., , .-." -, ....

• '''0''.' Om 'U"'''''I ',pond,tu...

T""f,'S·o ,,'~ G<""",' , ,,"J

10.''''00

,'''6.''''

T""" 01'.. ",""',"" ,,,","', I~ .. 'I ,"""",

". ,~ ,2,"""7'

2 "" "4 ____~. 'C·_.'" 2' '" '" 86' _____" ,'U.-·

'unO e",",", Eo" 01 Yo., b "".;"

MACOMB COU~TY, MICHIGA~

5111'1"",,,nl 01 Budgeted Revenues, E~pendil\1res and Ch3ngu in Fund Balance

Individu31 Funds By Category

Fiscal Yu. En<llng Oecembe. 31, 2013

n.".,U", p'""""Y T"'~s

l'c.,."e' & """n,1S '",~'gQv~mme",,,'

Cha",es 10' Ser''''''''

loveSlmenl 'n"",,' F,ne, & Fori• .-,",,,;

~.;mO'" "''1'.,.,15

Ind"e" CC>\ Allocat,on

Q'h., "~v~n"e

Tota' ~...... nve.

Expendi!u'e>

P~rsor.r,e1

Su""',e, & Serv,ce'

C"nfe' enees & Tra,n,ng

'J',';"~s

Rep• ., & Ma,"leoan,~

Vehtcle Ope' ,,"oos

Ceo" .. " S'... ~e'

Cap,t.' Oull.,·,

fJ~~l ~.c.-,c< . P"ne'pal

Debt S.rv,"O - In'."", and "'es

I"""." ," Iro", G~r.,al Fond

T"n5le" ," ,,""'. O'oe, funds

Tronsters OU'

TO'" Othe' FIn.nClng s~u,,,•• IU•••):

Not 'n"ea,o ILleereaSe) '0 Fund Salance

'U"~ 6"'0'" QoglnnlnQ af Yea'

G....er~'

F"n~

100,364,243

414,400

21,414,t'r5

26,211.831

400.000

~ 1f, 400

~"~.503

R;9',.37S

257.1~~

172,31f,.1~'

\"1.811,933

'~.256.5G8

160,502

3 ~3$J.i'0

',M'lS:.o

,1.~ ,,.

'n": 1t\l

544J.~'"

659.2U7

17'.Q~7 , ••

'.08,)'1. "

lH;~5,ilO0

IT!,8~M6J}

!~~ 17' 46]i

'. -,Q ~i;6 0401

" O\9.JG8

i~6!, f;, ~\

Community

Corrections

" 09'

'1.597

ill '/m

71,59)

7'.5g7

Community

S"",ice.

;'QlHjO'J

".).2"0

'U,OOO

,o},26O

')2,599

~9;'."~O

1,270

a'.u~

i74.'3~)

(00 WJj

\Cf)W,O)

!114.239,

185,1J5

~",8%

Debt F'~Mom Hill

S~",;,. '"n~ PO"

114.4,3

1~5 r"'j

~69,46B

124,408

'67,00(

'j~,OOJ

, 'J' C) 'XII)

: I\M 2'"

500

tl, '01 oM

il.tlJ2.220:'

32?5,,7

1322.S(7)

'.'03'7,40 2~~·.~U'

b,9:\1 ,4C, 252.507

,:'''''."~'-;·l 100000!

J.8~6.282 7%.622

2.%1.302 ~7b (,n

cont,n",," ~n oe,' p.>ge

B 8


Statemenl Df Budgell!'d R",v",nues. E.pendilures and Changes In Fund Balano::e

Individual Funds By Category

Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2013

",.,,110 T Bo<'l'

Medical Ca,e

Facllfty

Mlc~,ga"

WOlk.'

P'o~ny Taxo.

l,o,,",'" & P."",I'

Inle'90vemmenlal

O,~'g"S 1m S"""o,,",

In··'""menllncome

""'0' & "mfortu,,,",

Re,mD'"oemen!>

Fn~"e'l C-o" A"Oc3I'O"

O'he' Rb<oue

4120104

>;.n.41£ 4.120104

Expend""' ••

Sup~,<, & SCI""'" CDol",,",e, S T'''''''''9

U',I,'., Rep"'" & Ma,"'o'ance

vel"c'.OPe'al'on,

Coolrocl Se....'oe'

Inlemal Se"Kes

Cap,'alOu'iay

Deb,5e","a - P,mc,pa'

Debt Se,vlCe - 'ole'eol and "'OS

,ao n, :;81 J99

28:\

61,000

'CC ,

"(~)

14483,&48

4.';8n,~!12

1.~OO

&49.000

19,000

u~,rJ

2411.'JoO

'Ii,'.''''')

128.QOD

~ "".,,7~

~" 1'1',1

I 11.1:!~

To'a' ExpeodHu,e. _____~,,,'T1.'.1£ <3,57,:>76 4 120, '04

T,.,,,loF> '" "om ('the' F'Jn~.,

T'''','loF> out

"<e' '"ore"," ,:r..o',"c' ,n Fund 50'o",e !G1800,

ruM 8'''00< fe<;"'o'og o( t.a, 200.597

Fund S",nee, E"d of Voa, 132.697

B 9


Slalem'lIlt of Budgeted R",v",nu",s. Expendit~res and Cha"ye5 In Fund BlIlllnce

IndlYidu31 Funds By Category

Fiscal Year Eliding O",c",mber 31, 2013

Rev.nue,

P,op~,ty I",e,

L'c.o.;·~ & Perm'"

Int.rgovernmen,.'

Char~es fo' ~~'''',.,

'nve.,rnon' 'oo~n,.

f'ne' & Fori.,t".>

R.,mOc..""'."t5

'"o"ocl Ce.t Aliceal",o

Olh.r Revenue

R.",onun,en,,,,un

200,00(>

R.~,.'er '" DeedS

TeChnO'Ogy Fund

700,000

Revenue Sharin9

Res."'. Fund

,

Velerans'

AHa;"

'N~,9l0

'", ",0

, To,.,

'01 ~'T~G'

"~.40'J

n.J~I.~g,

5~,29·\.949

545.0,[,

AlBAnO

B 1J(;.~j

8.29,,:178

,': t, '01'

To'.' R.....nu05 ,rJO-',nU 100.000 I,U43,OW .!U~.7Q2.1H

hpend"u'H

PefS"o".'

SUW""' S S.,v,o",

Goo'ereneo. S. Tra'n'ng

Utili'es

Ropa"s & Ma'nlena"e

Vehrcle Ope,al,on.

C;~n"acl Serv,ce,

IOIE,,"" 5~,,"'"'

Ca~",,,' ,,"11·"1 De"' $ec.-,c. . P"o",pal

D~b\ Sec,ice -Inte,,,,,t "old 'e••

1.000

Ie-J.OO~'

Gb.2Ul

:~ .,'~

6fl2.JO-:;

H'Y"

o"O'..~

'.0.'1' ~

:';".' .'0

10.000

7 500

8< ~'h

n(,nc'

IC,1.:;'9M"

24,9006.3U,

178.'8~

'0;81\',5

, Gn.S3'

, '46,564

".687,~87

u.817,9"

B)" <Q'

2.067,'0

TolO' E,p.nd;'uros 200,000 700.000 1.003,06CJ 2'2,182.793

Rev.nu.s D,er [uno"l Expendi,",OS (10.080.Q4e)

O'h., ";"anc'ng Sourc.. IlJse'l;

T'an,r." 'n ~on Gene'al F"no

T'_"'$1~.. ,n ~om O'he, FondS

T'ans,",,, oul

7<",.;0.'

8.o~~ ":'0

·?~~~.'~ll

Total 0'"0< F'na"<;n~ 500'0.' IV.e'l {21,963.119)

Net Inue,," rDoc"••e' ,n '""d Bolonce

'"nd ~.'.nGe 6""'""'"9 n, Yoar t.Y~".i.,' '''''l,~i)3

132,0431651

40.%4,TJ2

'""d a.'"nCe, End 0' Y••, :.;>g":~ , %3,883 , 6.~<1."~7

B - 'Q

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Detail by Category - All Departmenls

DEPARTMENT ALL DEPARTMENTS

fUND GENERAL FUND

FUNCTION ALL FUNCTIONS

Revenues:

Property Taxes

Licenses & Permlls

Intergovernmental

Charges for Services

InveSlment Inoome

Fines & Forfeitures

Reimbursemenls

Indirect Cost Allocation

Other Revenue

$

Year Ended December 31,

Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 Actual Ac.tu<ll Amended Recommended

138.020.133 $ 126.586,902 $ 114,247,307 $ 108.534,9<12

37'3,479 411,383 433,400 414,400 6,094.795 7,831,157 7,865,567 21,428,237

26.873,786 21,457,533 22.605,583 25.975,795

1,431,882 606.490 2,150,000 400,000

766,313 751.177 851,000 813,827

5,925.162 7,100,116 6,959,417 8.095.958

9,120.572 10,257.636 6,410 734 8.291,730

167,410 258,438 280,774 257,125

2013 Recommended

, 106,364,243

414,400 21,414,175

26,217.937

400,000

818,400

8.136,503

8,293,378

257,125

Total Revenues 190.781,532 175.460,632 163.803,762 174.212,014 172,316.161

Expendilures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Room & Board

Conferences & Trainin9

Utilities

Repairs & Maintenance

Road Conslruction & Maintenance

Vehicle Operations

Conlracl Services

Inlemal Services

Capilal Oullay

109,541,327

18.298,945

23,407

3,576,119

2,959.546

793.412

6.946,082

4.246.455

523,635

101,142.403

14,413,984

31.222

3,066.805

3,513,622

793,246

6,126,287

2,740.066

367.292

106.046,662

15,320,973

85,219

3,996,324

3,028,042

1.040.306

7,634,874

2,555,361

570,053

128,901,895

19,141.630

186.502

3,<160,065

3,531,999

1,143614

8.444,507

5.469044

633,957

131.811,933

19,258,506

186,502

3,539.740

3,602.534

1.145,314

6.402,187

5.443,619

659,207

Total Expenditures 146,910,928 132.216,949 142,277,614 170,913.433 174,027.144

Revenues O"er (Under) Expenditures 43,670.604 43,243,883 21.525,968 3,296,581 (1,711,5831

Other Financing Sources (Uses):

Transfers in - Olher Funds

Transfers out

24.818,276

(60,561,441)

24,606.033

---..--i53,263,667)

26,279,840

(56.970.556)

16.233,296

(37,650,406)

8,655,000

(37,829.~

Tollll Other Financing Sources (Uses): (35,763.165) (28"177,654) (30,690,718) (19417,112) (29,174,463)

Nellncre1lse (Decrease) in Fund Balance

Fund Balanoa. Beginning of Year

8,107.439

32,428,981

14,766,229

40,536.420

(9,164,750)

55,302,649

(16.118.531)

46.137,899

(30,886.046)

30,019.368

Fund 811111nce, End ofYellr $ 40.536,420 $ 55,302,649 , 46,137,899 • 30.019.368 S 1866.678)

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Detail by Function· All Departments

Revenues: Property Taxes

Licenses & Permils

Intergovernmental

Charges ,lor Services

Inveslmenl Income

F,;nes & Forfeilures

Reimbursements

Indirect COS! Allocation

Olher Revenue

S


Audited Budgeled

2009 2010 2011 2012 Actual Actual Amended Recommended

138,020,133 $ 126.586,902 $ 114,247,307 , 108.534,942

379,479 411,383 433,400 414,400

8,094,795 7831.157 7,865,567 21,428,237

26.873,786 21,457,533 22.605.583 25.975,795

1,431,882 806,490 2,1S0,ODO 400,000

768,313 751,177 851,000 813,827

5,925,162 7,100,116 6,959,417 8,095,958

9,120,572 10,257,636 8,410,734 8,291,730

167,410 258,436 280,774 2~7.125

2013 Recommended

, 106,354,243

414,400

21,414.175

28,217,937

400,000

813,400

8,136,503

8,293.378

257,125

Tolal Revenues 190,781,~32 175,460,832 ~803,782 174,212,014 172,316,181

Expenditures;

Le9islative

JudiCial

General Govemmenl

Public Safely

PUblic Works

He31th & Welf3re

Recreation & Culture

C3pital Outlay

1,965.609

31,591,612

45.271.823

62,679.359

4.857.226

1,664

523,635

1.871.825

30.318.222

37,607,561

57.338,397

4.69:.:?11

1,441

387,292

1,393,6"1

30,874,293

42,945,151

61,399,556

4,949,714

145,374

570,053

1.381.790

31.311,822

44,777,619

63,708,587

5,729,780

23,149.027

<'20.851

633.957

1,412,732

32,212.978

45,591,450

64,621.762

5,844.878

23.458,924

225,813

659,207

TOlal Expendilur"s 146,910,928 132,216.949 142.277,814 170,913,43J 174,027.744

Revenues Over (Under) Ellpendilures 43,670,604 43.243.883 21.5<'5,968 3,298,581 (1,711,583)

Other Financin9 Sources (Uses);

Transfers in - Other Funds

Tr3nsFers out

24.818.276

{60,581,441)

24,806,033

(53,283,687)

26,279,840

(56,970,558)

18,233.296

(37.650,408)

8655,000

137,829,463)

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses)' (35,763,165) _l.?..!H77 .654j (30,690,718) (19,417.112) (29,174, 46 :D.

Nellncrease (Decre3se) in Fund Bal3nce

Fund Balance. Beginnin90fYe3r

8.107.439

32,428,981

14,766,229

40.536420

(9,164,750)

55,302,649

(16,118.531)

48.137,899

(30,886,046)

30,019.368

Fund Balance, End of Year S 40,536,4<'0 , 55.302.649 , 46,137,899 , 30,019368 , (868,678)

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Revenues by Type and Department

Ye~r Emed December 31.

Audited Budgeted

2009 ~OlO 2011 2012 2013 A<:t",,1 A,(ual A,nSflded ~~commer>ded Recomme,.,jed

Prop"rty rues

Non-Departmelltal , 138.0;;0.13J , 126.588,902 , 11~.247.307 ,

108_~J4942 , 106,364,243

licenses & Permits

C,rcuil Court (151

Coeri'. 210,747 232.335 23L.iXIO 219.[100 219,000

Facililies & Operation>; '"' Famil~ Counseling 7(\.260 71.710 81.000 75,000 75,000

Public WoM<, 21.~4<I 38.960 40.000 40.000 40.ooD

Treasu(~r "" "" "" "" '00

Non-Dep;Jrtme"tal 74,315 67,693 BO,DOO 80.000 30.000

379,47'1 411,JIl3 ~]3,400 4 '4_~()(J 41~,400

Inl~'"90vernme~t211

Cir>:YII C'"Ju!t 4,8J5,552 H38.442 5,OO8.68~ 4.818.688 ~,B186M

DislnL( Sour1- Romeo 55,995 56,236 60,72~ 55,724 55,724

Dislrio C<>ur'\ - New Ballim"'e T6l49 72,018 70,724 70,08'1 70,089

Elecllons 5,10.5 5.680 7.000 7000 7.000

Emergency M.,na~menl J4,.140 ~B_7~' ~).OOO 43.000 43000

Health D&partm&nl 2,348.938 2,.;~8,'138

J\J\'e',~e Courl. 154,997 IS,1,9,,? 154,997 154.')97 154,997

Probale Court' Menial 148,197 144,159 n~,q19 148.7:C~ 148,724

Probale Court - Wills & E,131&" 148197 144,159 139,919 13<';,'119 139.9'9

Pla"ning 8. Economic Deotl(,pmenl 30.000 211.0110

Pro,elulir>;l AMorn"y ~0,050 46M7 60,000 40.000 4[1,000

Sen,,,! C.-IJze", Services 346.158 352,096

SIJeriil 230.000 ~55,000 235,QOO 235,000 235,000

Non-Departmental 2,365,~')2 2.214.828 1915,596 13,000000 13.000.000

8,O-'J4,795 7,831.157 7.865.567 21,1282-17 .1,4'4,'75


Yea, Ended December 31.

"'ud~"d Bu0geted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Adual Adual Amended Recvmm..nded Recommended


Board of C<Jmmissioners 1,l03

Building Authorily 7.025 3.G5Q 4.250

Cir<:uit Court 1.599,313 '.£>30,389 1.476,400 1,809,970 1,;:;09,970

Cieri< 467,896 613,105 567,919 585,419 585,419

District Cour'[· Romeo 312,686 35J.'O~ 789.200 789.200 739.200

Dislocl Court· New Baltimore 533,186 952.911 731.600 442.278 448,520

Equali2alion 40.~(\() 31,102 30.887 750 750

E'ecIIDn~ 10.697 B,078 16,500 18.500 16,500

Facilities Il. Operallon~ ~1"n(J 341.285 3~3,OOO 2,260.520 2,260,5"0

Family Counseling 113,410 90,015 , 25,000 100.000 100,000

F,nance 102.613 62.247 51.000 51,000 51.Duu

Health Departmenl 2.859,373 2.B59.373

Human Resources 1.619 1.992 2.000 2.0UO 2.000

Informalion Technolo<)y 5,842,521

Juvenile Cour 169.120 157.590 234.000 lea,500 188,500

IA$U E~ten.i()n 1.365 '" ProtAe CGurt- Menial " WO '" Prob~le Court - Will. Il. Eslales ~17.650 301.491 325,000 310,000 ~'o,orJfJ

Planning & Ec-:>nconic Developmenl " '" 3.600

Probalion· CIr(.uit Court 2,185 '" ProbalLon . DIW'<.I C~ur1 BrB,7BB 1,Q7B.2~7 B79,800 695,000 895,000

Prosecvling A~Dm~i 53,750 12,040 17,200 22.:1}() 22,200

Purchasin9 115,,<2 88,073 115,500 115.5()fJ 115,500

Public Works 355,074 647,517 352,770 408.0<6 493.02b

Regi,I'" of Oeed~ 4,4"7,IH 3,90B.622 4.909,000 2, 1~:',640 2.153.040

R~,mburserT\enl 1~,4:J2 242,713 375.000 275,000 275.000

Ri"k lAanagemenl 3,677 1.429

S"n;or Cit,zens ServLCes 210062 210,562

SheM' 10,394,699 10,456,lB~ 10,6l~J12 10.674,712 10,674,712

Techn,cal Services 375,771 312.492 396,500

Treasurer 26,260 <\1,7 H; 28,000 26.:lOu 26,300

NOIl-Oe~nm~,,,~.1 134,245 13~.<45 134,745 TJ34.245 1.934.245

21> B73.7!l6 21.457,533 22,605,583 25.975,795 <~.2'7.937

Inveslm"ntlncom"

Dislrict Cour1' Romeo "" ,", D,slrict Cour1- New Ball"""r", 1,057 n, Trc~surer 116,759)

Non-Oepar1menWI 1,429.987 £22.316 2.150,000 4['O,OOC 400,000

1,4:l1.BB2 B06.490 2,150,000 400,000 400,000


Year Erded December 31,

Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Al:lual Amende<! Recomme~ded Recommended

FI....s. & Forlei\ures

C'rLUII CO,," 71.120 84,109 173.500 95,000 95.000

DlSlricl C""I'I' Romeo 220.642 272,726 264.000 264.00G' 264.000

D"lrid Court- New Balliroorn 3'1,885 288,327 263,000 2,1,827 296,400

Juvenile Coun 12,714 9.470 2,500 6.500 6,500

Law Library 8.500 8.500

Prosecuting AIlume~ 125,334 74.523 125,000 125.000 125000

SherIff l5.3Bf> 21.6S3 22.000 22.000 ~L,OOO

T'ea~urer I,2J2 329 1.00') 1,000 1,000

768,313 7S 1.177 851.000 ~ lJ,e27 818.400

Reimbursements

Circuli CotJ~ 8~O,3£~ 945,&85 1.050,ODO 1,31Xl.040 1,JOO,040

Clerk 5.7~,7 5,770 2.550 2,550 2,550

DI$lnct C<>~r1 - Romeo 56,440 64.733 43.550 ~},600 43.600

D'~I<i<;t Courl- New Balilmore 55.974 66,730 100.400 7"lt5 80,700

o.,parlmenl 01 Human Servlce~ ~OO,O'J() 400.000

Equallzalion 145

Elec(lons 1l,~30

Emergency Managemen( 1.836 4.6H 12,000 41.000 41,000

F"l(jl,t,e~.\ Ope'alions 1,30&,7,i4 1,998.66, 1.025,250 1,0,5.000 1.025.000

F",~,,"e :'.7 WO

H"alln D"parlmenl 195 '0;

Human Res<lurces '" '" 300 ;00

Inrormati<ln Te~hn(>logy ;~ " Juve",le Court 227 ,813 278,697 300,000 400.000 40'1.000

Law LibraI)' 1.000 3,000

MSU ExtenslDn 5,000 3.825

Pmb"t" COUrl - Menial 5,"9:1 1.155 1(1,0(10 1000 1,000

P""oole Court- Wills.\ Estal~, eo 29

PIJnning Ii EconomIC De",-,IQ~nlenl " "' Pro~~lion - District Coort " ProsecUling A~orney " 1437 '" WO WO

Purchas,ng 1,400 " 10,000 10.000

PubliC Wol1o.' 1,066,252 1.218.065 1725,510 2.045,9!!7 2081.991

Reglsl'" ,,1 Oee.l~ W 5[' W

Reimbursement 351.550 nO,703 ~30,000 01.00C' 410,000

Research & Relerence Cenler 90,201 ~2,2n

Ris~ Manage.71enl 5.",~7

Semor Cillzens Serv",,,, 2,000 :'2.000

Sr'enfl 1,982,839 2.202,287 2,224,~5u 2.224.650 2.224.650

T""hn"",1 Services 7519 5.351 29.000

Trea~Llfef '" WO '" WO

.f"Q n-OeD'''1rTenlal 1,360

5,S'25,162 7100,116 6,959,417 8095.958 B.136.';0]

C 5


Indirect Cost AIiOCiIlioJl

Heallh Departmenl

Information Tfflmology

Non-Departrne"I~1

Audiled

~OO9

Aclual

9, '20,572

L010 AC(u.ll

10,257,636

Year Ended December ~1,

2011 Amended

8,410,734

Budge''''''

2012 Recomrr,er>ded

20B,17B

113,552

8,000,000

2013 Recommended

208,178

85,200

8,000,000

9,120,572 10,257,636 B.41O,n~ 8,291.730 B,293,378

Other Revenue

"'ppo~",nrnenlComrnis"cn

Board o~ CommiSSioners

Charter Commission

Circuit Court

Cieri<

Corporation Counsel

Oislncl Court· Romeo

Dislricl COlJ~ - New B~llIrrt<)ff

Fa(-,Iill~" &. 0.,..,,,1;00'\

F,Mllce

Healll\ Dep.'M1enl

H,""3rl R"suur"",

MSU E.><lens.on

Probate Court - Will~ & ESla(eS

Pro;;ecullng A~omey

Purchasing

Public Works

Regisler of Deeds

Reimbursemenl

Sl1e"ff

NOIl·Departmenlal

'" " 3,109

2,5<1

2,236

" 32,270

23H

" 1.~12

1,935

90.469

'" 12.531

1,029

16,366

'" '"

4,l07

2.100

lAS:!

60.lJ32

8,622

3,7l1

W,172

{4.87~)

'CO

139.179

c;

11,238

~,~1:

'"

38,774

~D.iX'O

12,000

150,000

CO

CO

6~,8L~

80,000

12,000

100,000

CO

CO

65,025

80,000

12,(lr;O

100,000

1G7,41O 25e,~J3 280,774 ~'",7 125 257.1~5

rO'al Operatlr.g Revenues 1~O.7eI.532 175,460,clJ2 163,803,782 17~.212.0H 172,316,161

Tr..ns,",,,,, In

Board of Cammi,,,i,,,,,,,,,

DLsl,,"1 C(>,,~· Romeo

Plann,"9 & EL[>nc<ni~ O~""loprn"n(

Prosec,""ing Anome'l

T,&a~ur"r

Non-Departme"I~1

60,000

2~,75B,Zn.

3.5UO

200r)1)

24,782,533

2000

16,992

59,775

26,~01 ,073

20.000

18,213Z'O 8,655,000

24ala,~16 24,806,033 26,279,MO 18,233,296 8,655.000

215.599,808 ; 200,266,865 ; 190,OB:J.bZ2 , 192,445,310 , 180.971,161

C·6

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Expenditures by Function and Department


Audited Budgeted

'l){)9 2010 2011 2012 2013 AclllJI Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Legislalive

Board of Commissioners 1,965,609 1,871,825 1,393,671 1,381.790 1,412.732

Judicial

Circuit Court 9.372,556 9.002.008 9,518,041 10,279,574 10,436,753

District Court- Romeo 1,1D7,353 965.664 1,047,868 1,138,293 1,159,117

Distric1 Court New BJUimore 1,377,086 1,557,565 1,337,263 1,385,866 1,414,459

District Court - 3rd Class 37,700 33,115 50,000 50,000 50.000 Family Counseling 190.526 154.376 208,498 169,038 171,112

J~ry Commission 65.924 65,105 116,121 117,911 117,911

Juvenile Court 5,646.521 5,462,874 5,402,351 5,302,090 5,393.261

Law Library 31,500 31,500

Probate Court - Mental 1,132,831 1,011,043 979,592 937,721 954,400

Probate Court - Wi,'/~ & E~tate~ 2.461.179 2,308,373 2,438,276 2.543514 2,588,010

Probation - Circuit Court 125,836 116,689 128,024 125.828 125,828

Probatiorl - District Court 1,299,002 1,213.298 1,050,682 588,527 600,515

Prosecuting Allorney 8,755,098 8,428,112 8,597,577 8,641,960 9,169,512

31,591.612 30.318.222 30,874,293 31,311,822 32,21Vl78

General Government

Apportionment CommiSSion 18,141 38,774

Building AutMrrty 1.300 1,300

Charter Commis~ion 321,999 659

Clerk 4,266,169 3,854,569 3,945,918 4,215.459 4,310,522

Corporation Counsel 858,366 824,000 852,106 813,574 885,91Q

Counly Executive 1,068,85B 1,274,984 1,283,224

Equalization 931.232 806,886 948,234 977.438 1,009,341

Election~ 13,676 25.682 36.584 36,584 36,584

FaCilities 8. Operalion~ 14,425,867 13,759,339 14,905.074 15,813,821 16,168,870

Finance 2.118,106 1,800.177 1,855,938 1.925.303 1,968,170

Human Re~ources 1.782,291 1,611,076 1,746,296 1,990,762 2,026,648

InformaMn Technology 5,917,860 5,001 565 5,627,566 5,632,943 5,662,637

MSU Exlension 1.001,409 745,251 927.448 895,480 909,B66

Plannin9 8. Ecclnomic De'Jelopmenl 2,425.771 2,275.265 2,521,342 2,613,087 2,666,509

Plat Board 1,000 1000 1,000

PubliC Affairs 129,519 3,142 3,142

Purchasing 1.4 79,337 1.267,615 1.402,176 1,427.836 1,466,074

Reglsler of Deeds 1,536.370 1,391,929 1,639,074 1,774,867 1,815,638

Reimbursement 768.443 691,769 789,170 837,787 857,563

Risk Management 308.695 343,694 364,129 382,463 392,077

Treasurer 2,002.173 1.934.316 2,089.557 2,236,331 2.262,717

Non Departmental Appropriations 4,984,540 1,246,486 2,182,165 1,666600 1,666,600

45,271,823 37,607,561 42,945,151 44.771,619 45,591,450

---

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Expenditures by Function and Department

Year Ended December 31.

Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Public Safety Civil Service Commi!:>!:>ion 12,7% 9,375 17,250 17,250 17,250

Court Building Safely 922,435 828,210 821,318

Emergency Management 255,069 242,132 257,343 989,609 1,007,737

Security 581,713 427,440 457,189 Sheril! 60,174,011 55.163,766 59,167,417 62,701,728 63,596,775

Technical Services 733,336 867,474 679,041

62,679,359 57,338,391 61,399,558 63.708.587 64,621,762

Public Works

Public Works Commissioner 4.857,226 4.692211 4.949.714 5,729,780 5.844,878

Health & Welfare

Health and Community Services 140.893 184.277 185,925

Health Department 19,823,861 20,089,41~

Senior Citizens Services 1,628,455 1,671,153

Resident County Hospitalization 1.512,434 1,5'2,434

Water Quality Board 1,664 1A'll 4,481

1,664 1.441 145,374 __'_3.149,027 23,456.924

Recreation & Culture

Reference & Re~earch Cenler 220.851 225,813

Capital Outlay 5~3.635 387,292 570,053 633,957 659,207

Total Oper<lting Expenditures 146,910,926 132,216,949 142,277,6'" 170.913,433 174.0~7.744

Transfers Out 60.581.441 53,283,687 56,970,556 37.650A08 37829,463

Total Expenditures $207A9~.369 $ 185,500,636 $ 199,248372 , 208,563,841 $ 211,857.207

C8

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Detail by Category

DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION

APPORTIONMENT COMMISSION GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Apportionment Commission is responsible for establishing County Commissioner district boundaries within Ihe County. The Apportionment Commission consists of Ihe County Clerk., the Coullty Treasurer, Ihe Prosecuting Allorney, and the Chairperson of each of the two political parties whose candidates for Secretary of State received Ihe mosl voles in the last election for Ihal office.


Audited Budgeted


Revenues: ,Olher Revenue $ $ 38,774 $ $

Expenditures:

Supplies & Servir.:es 4,000

Contract Services 18,141 34,774

Total Expenditures 18,141 38,774

,Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ $ (18,141) $ $

C·9

• • •



BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS GENERAL FUND LEGISLATIVE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Board of Commissioners is a 1J member body elected every two years 10 repres~ml the citizens of Macomb County in providing servic.es

and aclivities throuqh the cre.al;on of vilnous committees

Revenues: Charges lor Services

Other Revenue

Total Revenues

Expenditu~es:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Conferences & Training

Repairs & Mainlenance

Conlrilcl Services

Ifllemal Services

Tot~1 Expenditures

ROlvOlnues Over (UndOlr) Expenditures

Other Fimmcing Sources (Uses):

Transfer& in - Other Funds

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures

POSITION TYPE

Milnagers & Supervisors

Prufessional Support

Clerical Slaff

Total Position Count


Audited Budgeted


1,703 $ $

15 512

1.718 512

1.846.042 1.767,978 1.201.256 1,20·1,225 1,235.167

62.789 58,855 78,862 54.012 54,012

10.000 10.000

355 400 400 400

72,500 72 ,500 72,500

76.423 44.992 40,653 40,653 40,653

1,985,609 1.871,825 1.393.671 1.381,790 ___1,412.732

(1,9S3,B91) (1,871.313) (1,393.671) (1.381790) (1,412.732)

2.000

$(1,983.891) 5(1.871,313) $(1.391.671) • (1,381.790) $ (1,412J32)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Actual Ac;tual Amended ReLomm~mded Recommended

:.160 26,0 130 130 13.0

40 40 4.0 <0 40

30 3.0 2.0 10 1 0

33.0 330 19,0 160 18.0

C - 10



BUILDING AUTHORITY GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT"

The Building Authority was incorporated as a non-pm!i! Authority for the purpose of acquiring. constructing, furnishing, equipping, owning. Improving, enlarging, operating and maintaining bUildings used by departments and agencies of the County. In acquiring propeny, il may do so by purchase, oorlslruclion, lease, gift, devise or condemnalion. In addition, it may issue sell-liquidating revenue bonds provided that such bonds shall be payable solely from the revenues 01 ['-uch property_

Year Ended Decp.mber 31,

Audited Budgeled

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Amended Rewmmended Recommended

Revenues:

Charges for Services $ 7,025 $ 3.050 $ 4,250 $ $

Expenditures:

Supplies 8. Services 1,300 1,300

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 7,025 $ 3.050 , 4,250 $ (1,300) , (1.300)

C -11

• • • • •

• • •



CHARTER COMMISSION GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Charter Commission was firSl elecled in November 2008 for the purpose of developing Ihe nrsl hom€ rule charter in the history of

Macomb County. The Charter Commission is also responsible for changes and amendmenls (0 th€ County charter in future years


Audiled Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Actual Actual Amended ReCommended Recommended

Rev€nues:

Other Revenue 582

Expenditures:

Personnel 25,656

Supplies & Services 88,549 659

Contract Services 206,835

Internal Servi,.es 959

Tolal Expenditures 321,999 659

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures • (321,999) (77) $

C· 12

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Detail by Calegory


CIRCUIT COURT GENERAL FUND JUDICIAl

MISSION STATEMENT:

The 16th Judicial Court of Macomb County provides opportunities for peaceful resolution of all public and private disputes through a

judicial forum.


Audited B\Jdgeled


Revenues:

licenses & Permits $ $ (15) $ $ $

Intergovernmental 4,835,552 4,698,442 5,008,688 4,818,688 4,818,688

Charges for Services 1,599,313 1,630,389 1,478,400 1,609,970 1,609,970

Fines & Forfei!ures 71,120 84,109 173,500 95,000 95,000

Reimbursements 830,368 945,685 1,050,000 1,300,040 1,300,040

Other Revenue 54 50 50

Total Revenues 7,336,407 7,358,610 7,710,588 7,823,748 7,823.748

Expenditures:

Person"el 4,528,874 4,266,005 4,708,025 5,465,165 5,597,344

Supplies & Services 4,501,028 4,560,321 4,641,855 4,641,300 4,666,300

Repairs & Maintenance 947 1,150 1,300 1,300

Conlract Services 28,426 26,873 37,000 32,500 32,500

Inlernal Services 313,281 148,809 130,011 139,309 139,309

Total Expenditures 9,372,556 9,002,008 9,518,041 10,279,574 10,436,753

Revenues Over (Under) E)(pendilures $12,036,149) $ (1,643,398) $(1,807,453) $ (2,455,826) $ (2,613,005)

2009 2010 2011 2012 Z013

POSITIO", TYPE Actual P.ctual Amended Recommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors 15.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 20.0

ProfeSSional Support 20.0 190 16,0 17.0 17.0

Clerical Slaff 28.5 213.5 275 26,0 28.0

Total Posiiion Count 64.5 63.5 61.5 65,0 65.0

E)(PE"'OITURES BY SERVICE Adminstralion $ 9.372,556 , 9,002.008 $ 9,518,041 $ 9,904,047 $ 10,054,634 Court Services 375,527 382,119

Total $ 9,372,556 $ 9.002,008 $ 9,518,041 $ 10,279,574 $ 10,436,753

C -13



CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION GENERAL FUND PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Civil Service Commission oversees the Civil Service system for the Macomb County Sheriffs Office for employing, promoting, and disciplining employees. II is based on the examination and investigation of all civil service appointment, employment and promotion.


Audiled Budgeted


Expenditures;

Supplies & Services , 4,690 $ 3,162 $ 7,750 $ 7.750 $ 7,750

Conlracl Services 8,105 ___6.213 9,500 9,500 9,500

Total Expenditures 12,795 9,375 17,250 17,250 17,250

Revenues Over(Under) Expenditures $ (12,7951 $ (9,375) $ (17,250) $ (17,250) $ (17,250)

C - 14



COUNTY CLERK GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To serve Ihe citizens of Macomb County effecienUy and effectiveiy in the areas of Vital Records, Jury Room for Circuit and Probate

Courts. and the Initialion of all Circuit Court cases, civil, domeslic, and criminal.


Audited Budgeted


Revenues: Licenses & Permits $ 210,747 $ 232,335 $ 232,000 $ 219,000 $ 219.000

Charges for Services 467,896 613,105 567,919 585,419 585,419

Reimbursemenls 5,757 S}70 2,550 2,550 2,550

Other Re..enue 3,109 4,707

Tolal Revenues 687,509 855,917 802,469 806,969 806,969

Expenditures:

Personnel 3,850,480 3,410,154 3,537,260 3,802,301 3,897,364

Supplies & Services 230,557 284.048 304,331 308,831 308,831

Repairs & Maln\enance 923 1,172 1,500 1,500 1,500

Vehicle Operations 1,083 753 1,100 1,100 1,100

Contract Servlce~ 1,598 2,144 2,144 2,144

Inlernal Services 183,126 96,844 99,583 99,583 99,583

CapilalOutiay 14,674 14,674 14,674

Total ElIpl:!ndilUres 4,266.169 3.854569 3,960592 4,230,133 4,325,196

Rl:!vl:!nues Over (Undl:!r) Ellpenditures $(3,578,660) $(2,998,6512- $(3,158.1231 $ (3,423,164) $ (3,518,227)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual /,mendl:!d Recommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors 4.0 4.0 50 5.0 50

Professional Support 25.0 26.0 22.0 22 () 22.0

Clerical SliJff 34.0 270 27.0 27.0 270

Total Position Count 63.0 57.0 54,0 54.0 54.0

c - 15



CORPORAliON COUNSEL GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide legal assistance 10 all departments and agencies of the Couniy_


Revenues: Other Revenue I

Audited

2009 2010 ActuElI Actual

2,521 $ 2,100 I

2011 Amended

Budgeted

2012 Rer.ornmended

I

2013 Recommended

I

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Inlern::!1 Services

811,932

16,744

29,690

785,291

17,727

20,982

812,281

20,455

19,970

831.089

21,485

21,000

842,625

22,285

21,000


Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures I (855,845) $ (821,900) I \852,706) I (873,574) I (885,910)

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

AClu::l1

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

Managers & Supervisors

Professional Support

Clerical Siaff

1.0

4.0

3.0

1.0

4.0

3.0

1 0

40

3.0

1 0

4.0

3.0

1.0

4.0

30

Total Position Counl 8.0 80 80 8.0 8.0

c - 16



COUNTY EXECUTIVE GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

The County EX€OJlive serves as chief executive otticeer of the Co~'nty and is responsible for supervising the activities of all County departments, except for those headed by Countywide Elected Officials. The mission of the County Executive's Office is to ensure [hal all cOllnly activities are geared toward efficiency. economy. and maximum s€lVice effectiveness for the citizens of Macomb County.


Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Servite!>


Vehicle Operations

Conlract Services

Internal'Services

Capital Outlay

$

2009 Attual

Audiled

$

2010 Aclual

2011 Amended

$ 887,232

71,350

3,650

7,000

72,500

27,126

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 1,098,708

72,350

300

4.000

72.500

27,126

5,350

2013 Recommended

$ 1.106,9~8

72.350

300

4,000

72,500

27,126

5,350

Tolal Expenditures 1,068,858 1,280,334 1.288.574

Revenues Over (Under) E;1{penditures $ $ $ (1,06fl,fl581 $ (1,280,334 ) $ (' .28fl,574)

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Retommended

2013

Remmmended

Managers & SupelVisors


Clerical Slat!

5.0

" 3.0

50

1.0

3.0

5.0

1.0

3.0

Tolal Position Count 9.0 90 9.0

C - 17

--------


DEPARTMENT fUND FUNCTION

COURT BUILDING SAFETY GENERAL FUND PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To E"nsure safe and secure enlrances to County owned facilities


Audiled Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Ac(ual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Expenditures:

Personnel $ 880,172 $ 801.338 $ 802,748 $ $ Supplies & Services 25,146 9.244 4,265

Repairs & Maintenance 459 500 Internal SeNices 17,117 17,169 13,805 Capital Outlay 1,300

Total Ellpendilures 922,435 828.210 822,616

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (922,435) $ (828,210) $ (822,618) $ $

NOTE: This department was consolidilt<!d with (he Sheriff Department beginning in 2012 in accordance wilh the Organizational Plan developed by Ihe Office of the County Executive.

C-18

------



DISTRICT COURT - ROMEO GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSiON STATEMENT:

The Romeo District Court serves lhe Village or Armada, Armada Township, Bruce Township, Memphis, Ray Township, the City of Richmond. Richmond Township, Romeo and Washington Township,


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Amended Recommenaed Recommended

Revenues;

Intergovemmental $ 55.995 $ 56,236 5 60,724 5 55,724 $ 55.724

Charges for Services 312,686 353,104 7B9,200 789,200 789.200 Inveslmenllncome 836 799 Fines & Forfeitures 220,642 272.726 264,000 264.000 264,000

Reimbursements 56.440 64.733 43,550 43,600 43,600

Other Revenue 2.236 2,453

Total RevenUEs 648,837 750,051 1,157,474 1,152,524 1,152.524

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Repairs & Maintenanc€

Conlract Services

Intemal Serv'ces

C1'pi\al Oullay

875,321

160,888

1,691

1,150

68.303

776,239

152,108

2,450

150

34,717

2,1345

850.018

159,427

1,750

3,000

33,673

26,841

942,790

157,080

1,750

3,000

33.673

964,214

157,080

1,750

3,000

33,673

25,250

Total Expenditures 1.107,353 968.509 1,074.709 138,293 1,184.967

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (458,5161 (218.458) 82,765 14,231 (32,443)


Transfers in - Olller Funds 3.500

R<i!v,;mu<i!s Over (Under) Exp<i!ndilures $ (458,516) $ (214,95~ $ 82.765 , 14.231 $ (32,443)

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

Managers 8. Supervisors


Clerical Staff

20

20 90

20

" 90

20 20 90

20 20

90

20 2.0

9.0

Total Position Counl 130 12.0 130 130 130

C - 19



DISTRICT COURT - NEW SALTIMORE GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

Ths NBW Baltimore District Court services Chesterfield TO'Nllship, Leno)( Townsl"1ip, Ihe City of New Baltimore and Ihe Village of New Haven


Audited Budgeted

~OO9 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Revenues: Intergovemmental , 76,249 • 72.016 S 70,724 $ 70,089 $ 70,089

Charges for Services 533,166 952,911 731,600 442.278 448,520

Investment Income 1,057 '14

Fines & Forteltures 311,885 288,327 263,000 291.827 29fi,400

Reimbursemen(s 55.974 66,760 100,400 78,185 80,700

Olher Revenue 60,032

Total Revenues 978,331 1,440,202 1,165,724 882,379 8%,709

Ellpenditures:

Personnel 1.100.165 1,068,102 1,lrt.936 1.156,001 1,184,144

Supplies & Servic.es :::'14,777 454,913 186,968 199,506 199,956

Repairs & Mainlenance 483 90 82 82 82

Contrad Services 2,493 2,533 2,000

Inlemal Services 59.168 31,9n 30,277 30,277 30,277

Capital Outlay 2,091 2.845 2,125

Total E:o:penditures 1,379,177 1,560,410 1,339,388 1.385,666 1,414,459

Revenues Over (Under) E:o:penditures (400.846\ (120,208) ----.J173,664) (503.487) (518,750)


Transrersoul (3.500)

Revenues Over (UndH) Ellpendilures , (400,846) $\123.708) $ (173,664) S (503.487) S (518,750)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors 20 2.0 2.0 20 20 ProfesSional Support 50 50 50 50 50

Clerical Slaff '" 11.0 mo 10,0 "0

Total Position Count 18,0 180 170 170 17.0

C - 20



DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES GENERAL FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Departmenl of Human Services provides public assistance, child and family welfare support 10 residents of the Slale through a network of over 100 county satellite offices throughout the $(<lte,


Revenues:

Reimbursements $

2009 Actual

AUdited

$

2010 Actual

2011 Amended

$

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 400,000

2013 Recommended

$ 400,000

Expenditures:

Supplies & Services 1.512.434 1,512,434

Revenues Over (Under) ExpenditUr\!S $ $ $ $ 11,112,4~ $ (1,112,434)

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE

Administration

Residenl County HO'5pitalilalion

County Emergency

County Foster Care

$ $ $ $ 17,972

1,439,962

48,5[)0

6,000

I 17,972

1,439,962

48,500

6.000

101<11 $ $ $ $ 1.512,434 $ 1,512.434

NOTE: The Goyemmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Statement No. 54, which requires any Special

Revenue Fund that receives a substan'ial portion of ils financial support from Ihe General Fund 10 be accounted for as if

were pari oflhe General Fund. The Department of Human Services receiYI!S more than 50% of its financial resourc:es from General Fund and, therefore, meets the requirements of Statement No, 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, it will be

budgeted for in the General Fund.

c - 21



DISTRICT COURT - WITNESS FEES GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

The County is responsible for paying witness fees 10 witnesses called by the County Prosecutor's Office 10 testify in matters being

handled in the various District Courts throughout the County.


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actua,' Amended Recommended Recommended

Expenditures: Supplies & Services $ 37,700 $ 33,115 , 50,000 $ 50,000 , 50,000

C . 22



COUNTY CLERK - ELECTIONS GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT

As a division oflhe County Clerk, the Elections department conducts and ove~ees all federal. slale, county and school elections

conducted In the County, It is also responsible for ensurin9 compliance with the Michigan Campaign Finance Act.


Audited BUdgeted


Revenues: Intergovernmen\al , 5,626 , 5,680 , 7,000 , 7,000 $ 7,000

Charges for SeNices 10,697 8,0-rs 16,500 16,500 16.500

Reimbursemenls 12,530

TOlal Revenues 28,853 13,758 23,500 23,500 23,500

Expenditures:

Supplies & Services 11,943 23,765 34,500 34,500 34,500

Repairs & Maintenance 184 350 350 350

Internal SeNices 1,733 1,733 1,734 1,734 1,734

Total Expenditures 13,676 25,682 36,584 36.584 36,584

Revenues Over(Under) Ellpendilures 15,177 (11,924\ (13,084) (13.084) (13,084)


Transfers QuI (370,000) (337,950) (337.950) (337,950) 1337,950)

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures , 1354,823) $ (349,874) $ 1351,034) $ (351,034) , (351,034)

C - 23



EOUALIZATION GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To prowle Macomb county wilh certified assessors for all mailers concerning valuation of property


Audiled Budgeted


Revenues:

Charges for Services $ 40.300 $ 31,102 $ 30,81.'7 $ 750 , 750

Reimbursements 145

Total Revenues 40,300 31247 30.887 750 750

Expenditures:

Personnel 869,472 757.704 901,950 9:33,138 964.341

Supplies Ilo Services 20,954 21,736 25,056 23,300 24.000

Conferences & Training 4,848

Repairs & Maintenance 500 500 500

Inlemal Services 40.808 22.598 20.728 20.500 20,500

Total Expenditures 931,232 806.886 948,234 977,438 1,009.341

Revenues Over (Unoor) EJtpenditures $ (890,932) $ (775,639) $ (917,347) $ (976.686) $ (1,006.591)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Aelu,,1 Amended Recommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors 40 40 4.0 30 10 Professional Suppor1 40 40 4.0 50 50

Clerical Slaff 30 30 30 30 3.0

Tot". Position Count 11 0 110 11.0 11.0"0

C·24



EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GENERAL FUND PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

Per Acl390 of 1982, to plan and coordinate emergency preparedness activities within Macomb County.


Revenues:

Intergovernmental $


Investment Income

Fines & Forfeitures

Reimbursements

Audited

2009 2010 Aclual Actual

34,340 $ 38,741

3,836 4,627

2011 Amended

$ 43,000

12,000

BUdgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 43,000

395,500

41,000

2013 Recommended

$ 43,000

396,500

41,000

Total Revenues 38,176 43,368 55,000 480,500 480,500

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Repairs & MainlerJance

Vehicle Operations

Internal Services

Capital Outlay

225,048

5,653

162

2,709

21,497

29,457

222,785

4,259

1,242

1,173

12,673

439

227,070

5,561

1.050

3,500

20,162

918,544

11,224

9,500

12.000

36,341

936,672

11,224

9,500

12,000

36,341

Total Expendilures 284,526 242,571 257,343 989.609 1,007,737

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (246,350) $ (199,203) , {202,343j $ (509,109) , (527.2lli

NOTE: The Technical Services department was consolidated with this department beginning in 20121n accordance

with the Organizational Plan developed by the Office of the County Executive.

C - 25



EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT GENERAL FUND PUBLIC SAFETY

MiSSION STATEMENT:.

Per Act 390 of 1982, 10 ph.n and coordinate emergency preparedness activities within Macomb County.

POSITION TYPE




Clerical Staff

2009 Actual

1 a 20

2010

Actual

1 a 20

2011 Amended

10

20

2012 Recommended

10

20

2013

Recommended

1.0 20

3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0

Technical Services:

Managers & SupeNisors


Clericai Staff

1.0

60

10

1.0

60

1.0

80 8.0

Total Position Count 30 3.0 3.0 11.0 11 a



Technical Services

, , , , 271,042

718,567

, 275,986 731,751

, , , , 989,609 , 1,007,737

NOTE: The Technical Services department was consolidated with this department beginning in 2012 in accordanC:E with the Organizational Plan developed by the Office of the County Exec:utiye

C - 26

-----

-----



FACILITIES & OPERATIONS GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To prD~ide professional engeneering and maintenance service in planning, conslrJclion, maintenance and operations of all counly-owned

buildings and grounds.

RellenlJ@s:

Licenses & Permits


Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Total Revenues

Eltpenditures:

Per~onnel

Supplies & Services

Utililies

Repairs & Mainlenance

Vehicle Dperalions

Conlrad ServiC€s

Interna,' Services

Capital Oullay

Total Eltpenditures

Revenues Over (Under) Eltpenditurlls

POSITION TYPE


ProfeSSional Support

Clerical Staff

Total Position Count


Audited Budgeted


• '88 • • • • 331,330 341,285 363,000 2,260,520 2,260.520

1,308,754 1,998,662 1,025,250 , ,025,000 1,025.000

46 8.622 50 50

1,640,418 2.348.569 __'._388,250 3,285,510 3,285,570

6.824,201 6,363.734 6,836,294 7,924,341 8,102,060

693,872 400,051 657,650 599,670 614,925 3,576,119 3,068,805 3,996.324 3,460,085 3,539,740

2.709,636 3,367,450 2,790,049 3.275,300 3,345,835

47411 49.625 60,000 52,000 53,000

301,214 222,219 293,354 205,875 213.555 273,414 287,455 271,403 295.550 299.755

19,553 26,305

14,425,867 13,778,892 14,931.379 15,813.821 16.168,870

$ (12.785,449) $(11.430,323) $(13,543,129L • (12,528,251) • (12,883,300)


100 10.0 10.0 11.0 11.0

90,5 81.5 77,5 86.5 86,S

3.5 3.0 1.0 3.0 30

104.0 945 90,5 100 5 100.5

C -27


DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCT"'O~N,-- _

FAMILY COUNSELING GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

Acl16 of the Public Acts of 1980 created the Fami,'y Counseling Service 10 act as an impartial, unbiased resource in evaluating

custody and visitation problems of minor chill:1ren


Revenue.!;:

Licenses 8. Permits


$

Audited

2009 2010 AClual Actual

70,260 $ 71,710

113,410 90,015

2011 Amended

$ 81,000

125,000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 75,000

100,000

2013 Recommended

$ 75,000

100,000

Total Revenues 183,670 161,725 206.000 175,000 175.000

Expenditures: Per!'onnel

Supplies &. Services

Contract Services

Inlernal Services

57,799

1,211

128,704

2,812

57.126

'9' 93,904

::!A49

58,427

2.525 145,000

2,546

63,967

2,525

100,000

2.546

66,041

2,525

100,000

2,546

Total Expendilures 190,~26 154,376 208,498 169,038 171,112

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures , (6,856\ $ 7,349 , (2,498) $ 5.962 S 3,888

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual 2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended 20'3

Recommended


Prolessional Support

Clerical St"ff " " 10 10 1.0

Total Position Count 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

c -28



FINANCE GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

According to slale statute, to provide ma.intenance of records and accounts, through the Finance Director.

Revenues:


Reimbursemenls

Other Revenue


Audited Budgeted


$ 102,613 $ 62,247 $ 51,000 $ 51,000

27 500

32,270 3.781

2013 Recommellded

$ 51,000

TOlal Revenues 134.910 66.028 51,500 51,000 51,000

E)(penditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Vehicle Operations

Conlrao;;t Servic:es

Inlernal Services

1,984,219

43,488

542

2,521

87,336

1.705,668

40,679

3,834

2,242

47,754

1,760,981

47,902

100

3,000

43,955

1,830,346

47,902

100

3,000

43,955

1,873,213

47,902

100

3,000

43,955

Total Expenditures 2,118,106 1,800,177 1,855,938 1,925,303 1,968.170

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $(1,983,196) $ (1 }34, 148) $(1,$04,438) $ (1,874,303) $ (1,917,170)

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Aclual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended



Clerical Staff

40

15,0

7.0

40

9.0

7.0

40

9.0 7.0

40

9.0

7.0

40

90

7.0

Tolal Position Count 26.0 20.0 20,0 20D 20.0

r:: -29



HEALTH DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Health Department guards and prolecls the health and wel'l-being of Macomb Counly residents through the promotion 01

safe, heallhfulliv;ng and by assiSllng those in need of health care.


Revenues:

Intergovernmental


Reimburserneols

Indirect Cost Allocation

Other Revenue

$

2009 Actual

Audited

$

2010 Actual

$

A2011

mended

Budgeltd

2012 Recommended

$ 2,348,938

2,859,373

195 208.178

&5,025

2013 Recommended

$ 2,348,938

2,859,373

195 208,178

65,025

TQtal Revenues 5,481,709 5,481,709

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services



Vehicle Operations

Contract Services

Internal Services

Capital Outlay

Debt Service" Principal

Debt Service -Interest and fees

13,604,251

2,256,784

29,583

22,954

116,083

960,636

2,833.570

149,101

13,869,802

2,256,784

29,583

22,954

116,083

96D,636

2,833,570

149,101

Total Expenditures 19,972,962 20.238.513

Revenues Over (Underl Expenditures $ $ $ $ (14,491,253) $ 114,756,804)

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recenlly issued Statement No. S4, which requires any Special

Revenue Fund that receives a substantial portion of its financial support from the General Fund to be accounted for as if

were part of the General Fund. The Health Department receives more than 50% of its financial resources from the General

Fund and, therefore, meets the requirements of Statement No. S4. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, it will be budgeted for in

the General Fund,

C - 30


DEPARTMENT FUNO FUNCTION


MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Health Department guards and protects the health and well-being or Macomb County reSidents through the promotion 01

safe, heallhfui living and by assisting those in need o! heallh care.


Audi\ed Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Amended Rewmmended Recommended

POSITION TYPE

Administralion:

Managers & Supervisors SO 50

Professional Support 1.0 1 0

Clerica,' Staff 5.0 5.0

11 0 11.0

Heilllh Educator Managers & Supervisors Professional Support 5.0 5.0 Clerical Staff

5.0 50

EMRAP: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support 3.0 30 Clerical Staff 10 1.0

4.0 4.0

Environmental Health: Managers &. Supervisors 70 7.0 ProfeSSional Support 28.0 28.0 Clerical Staff 50 50

400 40.0

PHS ADMIN: Managers &. Supervisors 1.0 1 0 Professional Support 20 2.0 Clerical Staff 1.0 1.0

40 40

Nutrition: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support 2.0 2.0

Cferical Siaff 20 20

Clinical Heal(h Services: Managers & Supervisors 10 1 0

Professional Support 16,0 16.0

Clerical Siaff 9.0 90 260 260

C·31




MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Health Department guards and protects the health and well-being of Macomb County residents through the promotion of

safe, healthful living and by assisting those in need of health care_


Audited BUdgeted


Denial:


Professional Support 45 4.5

Cleri,.al Staff 1.0 10

5.5 5.5

Maternal/Child Health Services:


Professional Support 17.0 170

Clerical Staff 100 10.0

27Q 27.0

ViSion & Hearing

Managers 8: Supervisors 1.0 1.0

Professional Support 80 80

Clerical Staff 2.0 2.0

11,0 11,0

Cardia Disease Risk Reduction


ProfesslonalSurport 4.0 4.0

Clerical Staff

4.0 40

Medical E)(aminer:

Managers & Supervisors 1 0 1.0

ProfeSSional Support 95 95


j 1.5 11.5

Communicable Disease:

Managers (I, Supervisors 10 1 0

ProfeSSional Support 9.0 9.0

Clencal Staff

100 100

C - 32




MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Health Department guards and protects the health and well-being of Macomb County residents throlJgl~ the promotion of

safe, healthful' living and by assisting those in need of heallh care.


Audited Budgeted


Animal Shelter:

Managers & Supervisors 2.0 20

Professional Support 11.5 11.5

Clerical Staff 1.0 10

14.5 14.5

Senior Services


Professional Support 4.0 40

Clerical Slaff 1.0 1.0

50 5.0

Total Position Count 1805 180,5


Administration $ $ $ $ 2,053,511 $ 2.072,491

Education 458,577 466,817

EMRAP 480.687 487,706

Environmental Heallh 4,317,703 4,384,735

PHS Admin 531.995 537,570

Nutrition 207,282 210,578

Clinical Health Services 3,110,437 3,155,882

Dental 507,6B7 514,058

Maternal/Child HealUl Services 2.667.308 2,712,362

Compuler Project 35,708 35,708

Vision & Hearing 655,099 660,543

Cardia Disease Risk Reduction 377,300 382,744

Medical Examiner 1,280,212 1,286,804

Communicable Disease 1.059,379 1,075.090

Animal Shelter 1,719,696 1,743,396

Senior Services 510,381 512,029

Child Health Fair

Total $ $ , $ 19,972,962 $ 20,238,513

C·33



HEALTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES GENERAL FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Department of Health and Community Services was created orl 2011 by County CharIer and is responsible for the overall management

and administralion of the activities and operations of departments and services related 10 health and community services, including

the Health Department, Community Services Agency, Senior Citizens Services and MSU Extension.


Audited Budgeted


Expenditures:

Personnel , , $ 125,793 $ 169,177 • 170,825

Supplies & Services B. iOO 8.100 8,100


Internal Services 6,500 6,500 6,500

Capital Ou~ay 4,000 4,000 4,000

Total Expendiluri!S , $ • 144,893 $ 188,277 $ 189,925

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Aclual Amended Recommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors 1.0 1 0 1 a Professional Support

Clerical Staff

Tol<ll Posilion Count 1,0 1 0 1.0

C - 34



HUMAN RESOURCES &. LABOR RELAnONS GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATE~ENT:

To prOVide cenlrali:!E'd high qua lily human resources management sel"\llce~ lind advise 10 elected officials, department heMs, super-'Isms

<one! ~ounly employees.


Audited Budgeled

2009 2010 :'(111 2012 2013 Aclual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Revenues

Charges far Ser\lices , 1,619 , 1,992 , 2,000 S 2,WO , 2.000

Reimbursements 25 JOG 300 300

Other Revenue 2,374 20,172

Tolal Revenues 3,9S3 22,189 2,3UO 2,300 :',300

b;pendilures'

Personnel 1,6('0566 H25.031 , ,584,680 1,176,199 1,812,085

Supplies & Services 33.756 99,15~' 74,125 16~,O72 164,072

ConferEnCEs & Training 5,000 5.000

Rep'lIrs & Ma<nlenance 85 250 230 250

Contract Ser\lices 55,649 42.403 45,000 4,000 4,000

IntErnal Ser\llCe, 92,22~, 44.487 41,2·11 41,241 41.241

Tolal Expenditures 1,782,291 1.611,076 1746.296 1.990,762 2,02".648

R"v"n ...."s Over (Under) Expendilures $11,778_298) $(1,588.&87) S 11,743,996) • (1.988.4621 • 12,024,348)

200'1 2010 ;:'011 2012 2013

POSlTlDN TYPE Act"a,' Actual Amend"d ----Recommended RecommendEd

Managers 8. Supervisors '0 6.0 eo 80 80

ProfeSSional Support '0 '0 l.U 2C1 '0

Clerical Staff 14,5 13,0 11.0 11,0 11.0

Total Position Count 23.5 21,0 '" 21 0 210

c -35



INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

Established and maintained to assist all Counly departments and agencies in analyzing and implemenling improvements in office

procedures wilh respect to their compLJter and information lechnology needs.


Revenues:


Reimbursements

Indirect Cost Allocal,on

$

Audited

2009 Actual

5,842,521 $

39

2010 Aclual

30

$

2011 Amended

Budgeted 2012

Recommended

$

83,552

2013 Recommended

$

85.200

Total Revenues 5,842,560 30 83,552 85,200

E;.:pendilures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Conferences 8. Training

Repairs 8. Malnlenance

Contract Services

Internal Services

3,879.081

1,689.622

349

188,780

160,028

3,213.652

1,563.820

131,628

92,465

3,404,193

1,967,519

3,000

170,000

82,854

3.684,689

1,812,400

50,000

3,000

200,000

82.854

3,726,083

1,870.900

30.000

3.000

150,000

82,854

Total Expenditures 5.917,860 5,001.565 5,627,566 5,832,943 5.862,837

Revenues Over (Under) ExpendihHes $ (75.300) $(5,001,535) $ (5,627 ,566) $ (5,749,3~ , (5,7Tf.637)

POSITION TYPE 2009

Actual

2010

AClual

2011

Amended

2012

Re=mmended

2013

Reoommended



Clerical Slaff

70 32,0

20

70

260

20

7.0

26.0

20

70

270

20

70

27.0

20

Total Position Count 41,0 35.0 350 36.0 36.0

C - 36



JURY COMMISSION GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

To maintain <.l complete listing of all regjstered voters in Macomb County for the soul purpose of selecting p.rospective jurors,


Audited Budgeted


Expenditures:

Supplies & Services , 65,150 $ 64,827 $ 17,450 $ 39,315 $ 39,315

Repairs & Maintenance '" sao 500 500 Contract Services 97,865 77.790 77,790

Internal Services 306 278 306 306 306 CapitalOuliay 13,680 34,976

TOlal Expenditures 79,604 65,105 151,097 117,911 117,911

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (79,504) , (65,105) , (151,097) , (117,911) , \117,911)

C - 37



JUVENILE COURT GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSiON STATEMENT:

The Juvenile Division of the Family Court provides exclusive jurisdiction over children under seventeen years of age who come Within

the provisions of the juvenile code.


Audited Budgeted


Revenues;

Intergovernmen\al • 154.997 • 154,997 $ 154,997 $ 154,997 • 154,997


Fines 8. Forfeillires 12,714 9,470 2,500 6,500 6,500

Reimbursements 227,833 278,697 300,000 400,000 400,000

Tola! Revenues 564,664 600,754 691,497 749,997 749,997

Expenditures:

Personnel 4,046,735 3,986.370 3,826,609 4.222.106 4,313.279

Supplies & Services 1,369,826 1,352,952 1,432,586 950,101 950.101

Repairs & Maintenance 920 6,449 6,449 6,449

Vehide Operations 1,501 1,400 3,500 3,500 3,500

Contract Services 10}82 13,760 27,975 17,000 17,000

Internal Services 217,677 107,472 102,932 102,932 102,932

CapilalOutiay 2,240

TOlal Expenditures 5,648,761 5,462,874 5,402,351 5,302,090 5,393,261

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (5,084,097) $ (4,862,120) $ (4,710,85'!l. $ (4,552,093) $ (4,643,264)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013


Managers & Supervisors 8.0 7.0 60 60 6.0

Professional Support 29.0 290 28.0 280 280

Clerical Staff 17.5 16.0 16,0 16.0 160

Total Position Count 54.5 520 50.0 50,0 50.0

C·38



LAW LIBRARY GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSIOr>,' STATEMENT:

To provide legal relerence materials (0 Macomb County residents as well as local 3t1orneys and allorneys employed by the Counly_

Y",ar Ended December 31,

AUdited Budgeted


Revl:!nues:

Fines & Forteilures $ $ , , 8,500 , 8,500

Reimbursements 3,000 3,000

Tolal Revenues 11500 11,500

E;llpendilures:

Supplies & Services 29,628 29,628

Internal Services 1,872 1,672


Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ $ $ , (20,000) $ (2D,OOO)

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Statement No. 54, which requires any Special

Revenue Fund thai receives a substantial portion 01 ils financial support from (he General Fund to be accounted for as if

were part or Ihe General Fund. The law library receives more than 50% of its financial resources from the General

Fund and, thererore, meets the requirements of Statement No. 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, it will be budgeted for in

the General Fund.

C . 39

---



MSU EXTENSION GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT

To promole a general program directed toward the local needs of agriculture, family living. 4-H youth,

marketing arid feosource development


Revenues:


Reimbursernenls

Other Revenue

Audited

2009 2010 Actual Actual

, ,1,365 990

5,000 3,825

"

2011 Amended

, Re

,

Budgeted

2012 commended Rec

, 2013

ommended

Tolal Revenues 6,377 4.815

Expenditures'

Personnel

Supplies & Sef'/ices

Repairs 11: Maintenance

Vehicle Operations

Contract Services

Internal Services

775,544

123.466

6" 1,101

2,916

97,763

588,436

116,198

55

1,451

1,306

37,805

756,969

123.060

1,350

2,150

3,000

40,919

525,352

327.513

1,300

2,200

39,115

539.738 327,513

1,300

2,200

39,115

Tolal Expenditures 1,001.409 745,251 927,448 895,480 909,866

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (995,032) (740.436) {927,448l (895,480) (909,866)

Other Financing Source.. (Uses):

Transfers out (30,000)

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures , (995,032) , (770.436) , (927,448) , (895,480) , (909,8661.

C,40



MSU EXTENSION GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To promote a general program directed toward the local needs of agriculture, family living, 4-H youth,

marketing and resource development

:'009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual Amended ReCOrllrlH'lnded Recommended


Professional Support 7.4 60 44 3.0 3.0 Clerical Staff 60 60 60 5.0 50

13.4 '2.0 10,4 80 80

Total Position Counl 13.4 12.0 10.4 80 80

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Adminslralion , a96,607 , 672,673 $ 821.044 $ 895,480 , 909,866 Mentor Program 104,802 102,578 106,404

Total $ 1,001,409 $ 775,251 , 927,448 $ 895.480 $ 909,866

c -41



PROBATE COURT - MENTAL DIVISION GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Probate Court provides jurisdiction over the administration of estates for bol,'1 lhe deceased and mentally III, including the

appo,;nlmenl of guardians and conservalors, name changes, and commilmEml proceedings for the menially ill,


Audited Budgeted


Revenues: Intergovernmental


, 148,197 , 144,159

91 • 139,919 , 148,724

100

, 148,724

100

Reimbursements 5,393 1,155 10,000 1,000 1,000

Total Revenues 153,590 145.405 149,919 149,824 149,824

Ellpenditures:

Personnel 801.475 695.758 710,614 641,244 657,923



Vehicle Operations 2,350 3,111 4,300 4,000 4,000

Contracl Services 31,052 38,106 26,000 26,000 26,000


Total E:xpenditures 1,132,831 1,011,043 919,592 937,721 954,400

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures --.L.l979,241) $ (865,638) $ (829,673) , (181,897) , (804,576)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual Amended Recommended Recomme"ded

Managers & Supervisors 20 20 20 2.0 2.0

Professional Support 3.0 2.0 20 , 0 1 0

Clerical Staff 50 4.0 4.0 40 4.0

Total Position Count 10.0 80 80 1.0 7.0



PROBATE COURT - WILLS & ESTATES Dr GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Probate Court provides Jurisdiction over the administration of estates for both the deceased and menially ill. Including the

appointment of guardians and conservators, name changes, and commitmen1 proceedings for the menially iiI.


Revenues:

Intergovernmenla,'

Charges lor Services

Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Audited


$ 148,197 $ 144,159

317,650 301,491

88 29 1,812 (4,874)

2011 Amended

$ 139,919

325,000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 139,919

310,000

2013 Recommended

$ 139,919

310,000

Total Revenues 467,747 440,805 464,919 449,919 449.919

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Contract Services

Internal Services

2,192,768

188.234

106

4,900

95,171

2,092,720

159,139

288

2,552

53,674

2,232,241

147,795

650

8,500

49,090

2,319,129

166,295

500

8,SOO

49,090

2,363,625

166,295

500

8,500

49,090

Total Expenditures 2,481,179 2,308,373 2,438.276 2,543,514 2,588,010

Re ...enues Over (Under) Expenditures $(2,013.432) $(1,867,568) $ (1 ,973.357) $ (2,093,595) $ (2,138,091)

POSITION TVPE

2009

Actual

2010

Aclual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended



Clerical Staff

50

110

14.5

50

11.0

13,5

50 11.0

12,0

50

1UJ

12.0

5.0 11 0

120

Total Position Count 30.5 29.5 28.0 280 28.0

C -43


DEPARTMENT FUNCTION ____---c=~FUN~O"c-=----PLANNING &. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

Established in 1956 as an expansion or activity under the County Planning Act, PA 282 of 194510 provide programs to the residents of

Macomb County In community development and economic development


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Aclu'll Amended Recomrnendf!d Recommended

Revenues; )ntergovernmental $ $ , 30,000 S 20,000 $

Charges for Services 56 140 3.600 Reimbursemenls 25 98

Total Revenues 81 238 33.600 20.000

Expenditures:

Personnel 2,178.216 2.094.594 2.300.069 2,312,387 2,365,809

Supplies &. Services 126.312 117.608 149,415 217,400 217,400

R"Ipairs &. Malnlenancoo, 995 2,485 2,500 2.500

Vehicle Operations 1,61 g 1,509 4.000 3.300 3.300

Conlrllct SelYices 15064 6,324 10,000 30,000 30.000

Intemlll SelYices 104.360 54,235 55.373 47,500 47,500

Total Expenditures 2,425,771 2,275.265 2,521,342 __'_,613067 2.666.509

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (2,425,690) 12,275,027) ~67.742) (2.593.~ (2,666.509)

Olher Financing Sourcl!s (Uses):

Transfers in - OthH Funds 60,000 20,000 20,000

Revenul!s Over (Under) Expendllurl!s 5 (2,365,690) $ (2,255.D27) S (2,467,742) $ (2,573,087) S (2,666.509)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Aclual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Managers &. SLlpelYisors 7.0 7.0 90 " 90

Prole........ ional Support 18.0 18.0 17.0 'SO 15,0

Clelical Staff 8.0 7.0---- 60 6.0 6.0

Tatal PosiLion Count 33.0 32.0 32.0 30.0 30.0

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Adrninislrallon Economic Doo,velopmenl

$ 2.180,761 2.450,010

$ 2,040,961 234,304

$ 2,251,783 269,559

$ 2,305.842 307.245

• 2,355,542 310.967

Total $ 4,630,771 S 2.275,265 S 2,521,342 $ 2,613,087 S 2,666509

C - 44



PLAT BOARD GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Pial Board is responsible for ensuring thal Ihe proper County agencies have reIJiewed and approved all plates pertaining \0 the subdivision of land in the Counly.


Revenues:

2009 Actual

Audited

2010 Actual

2011 Affi€nded

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

2013 Recommended

Expenditures:

Supplies & Services $ $ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000

Total Expenditures $ $ , 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 1,000

c -45



PROBATION - CIRCUIT COURT GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Circuit Court Probation Departmenl provides probation services to [Ile judges of the Macomb County Circuil Court, Services

provided include, bUI are not limited la, pre-sentence reports, sentence recommendalions and ensuring compliance with the terms

and conditions of probation Imposed by the Court,


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 201' 2012 2013 Aclual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Revenues;

Charyes for Services $ 2.185 , 470 , , , Expenditures:


Repairs & Maintenance 202 146 500 500 500

Internal Services 66,333 52,171 57,7 45 57,328 57,328


Revenues Over(Under) Expenditures (123,651) (116,219) (128,024) (125,828\ (125,828)

Revenues Over(Under) Expenditures , (123,651) $(116,219) , (128,024) $ (125,828) , (125,828)

C - 46



PROBATION - DISTRICT COURT GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

District Court Probation serves the Dlslri~1 Courts within Macomb County to provide supervision of those placed on probation, the

enforcement of compliance with the stalutof)' terms of probation, and complianre with addilionallerms ordered by the courts,

induding. but nollimited 10 the co),'eclion of court costs and restitutions.

Rl!vl!nues: Charges for Services

Reimbursements

AlJdi1ed

2009 2010 Actual Aclual

, 878.788 $1,076,287

1e


Budgeted

2011 2012 Amended Recommended

I 879.800 , 695,000

2013 Recommended

I 695.000

Total Revenues 878,803 1.076.287 879,800 695,000 695,000

ExpendillJres:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

RepairS & Maintenance

Internal Services

1.213,244

25,319

60,439

1,150,065

32.056

31,177

979,690

42,600

300 27,892

519,585

40,750

300 27,892

529,473

42,850

'00 27,892

Total Expenditures 1.299.002 1,213,298 1,050,662 588,527 600.515

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures , (420.199) , (137,011) S (170,882) S 106,473 S 94,485

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013 Recommended



Clerical Stat!

4.0

90

3.0

40

" 30

30

5.0

20

10

4.0

1 0

1 0

4.0

1 0

Total Position Count 160 14.0 10.0 6.0 6.0

C - 47



PROSECUTING ATIORNEY GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

To act as chief law enforcement officer in representing [he county in all Criminal mailers before [he Circuit, Probale, District or

Municipal courts in which [he Slale or County may be a direct litigant or party of interest.

Revenues:

Intergovernmental


Fines & Forfeitures

Reimbursements

Other Revenue


Audited Budgeted


, 40,050 , 46,897 , 60,000 $ 40,000

53,750 12,040 17.200 22,200

125,334 74,523 125,000 125,000

15 1,437 100 100

1,935 705

2013 Recommended

$ 40.000

22,200

125,000

100

Tolal R"venues 221,084 135,602 202,300 187,300 187,300

Expenditures;

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Vehicle Opera lions

Inlernal Services

8,052,351

365,017

1,815

1,703

334,212

7,908,375

326,366

90

1.943

190,838

8,136,958

286,958

1,000

2,800

169.861

8,161,206

306,953

1.000

2,800

169,996

8,688,758

306,958

1,000

2.800

169,996


Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (8534,014) (8,292,510) (8,39S,277) (8,454,660) (3,982,212)


Transfers in . Olher Funds

Transfers QuI (3S,872) (36,S99)

16,992

(37,000) (2S,000) (25,000)

Tolal Other Financing Sources (Uses): (3S,872) (36,S99) (20,O08) (?5,00O) (25,000)

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $"(8.569,886) $(8,329.109) $(8.415,2~ , (8,479, 66°1 , (9,007,212)

C - 48



PROSECUTING ATTORNEY GENERAL FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT:

To act as chief law enforcemenl officer in representing [he county in all c;riminal mailers before the Circuit, Probate, District or

Municipal courts in which the Slate or County may be a direct litigant or party of interest

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Ac;l~'al Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Administration:

Managers & Supervisors 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Professional Support 57.0 51,0 52.0 52.0 52.0

Clerical Staff 25,0 21.0 21.0 21,0 21.0

89.0 79.0 79.0 79,0 790

DHS - Juvenile Abuse & Neglect:


Professional Support 1.0 1.0 1 0 1.0 1 0

Clerical Staff

1.0 10 10 1.0 1.0

We1er Quality Unil:


Professional Support 1 0 10 1.0 1 0 1.0

Clerical Slaff 1 0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0

20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Total Position Count 92.0 820 820 82.0 82.0


Administration $ 8,465,812 $ 8,147,094 $ 8,312,812 $ 8.336.438 $ 8,858,478

DHS - Juvenile Abuse If, Neglect 142,637 138,980 140,433 141.283 142,931

Water Quality Urlll 182,521 178,637 181,332 189,239 193,103

Total $ 8.790.970 $ 8,464,711 :£ 8,634,577 , 8,666,96;] , 9,194,512

C - 49


DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTiON

PUBLIC AFFAIRS GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Office of Public Affairs faeil/lates the flow of accurate and timely information to the public regarding policies, practices, programs

and services of the Counly. It also provides media relations support and guidance to County departments and agencies. The office

was dissolved in 2010.


Audited Budgeted


Expenditures:

Personnel $ 126,603 $ 3,142 , 3,142 $ , Supplies & Services 616

Internal Services 2,300

Total Expendilures $ 129,519 $ 3,142 $ 3,142 , $

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual Amended ReCOmmended Recommended


Professional Support 1.0

Clerical Staff 1.0

Total Position Count 20

C . 50



PURCHASING GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide Macomb County departments with goods and services from outside agencies, central stores, multigraph printing,

interdepartmental ma;1 services and microfilm/retention records.


Revenues:

Charg€s for Services $

Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Audited


115,322 $ 88,073

1,400 12 90,469 139,179

$

2011 Ar1l€nded

115,500

80,000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 115,500

10,000

80,000

2013 Recommended

$ 115,500

10,000

80,000

Total Revenues 207,191 227,264 195,500 205,500 205,500

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Vehicle Operations

In(ernal Services

1,250,351

129,533

1,621

12,077

85,755

1,079,118

109,437

2,442

13,981

62,637

1,177,929

141,950

3,892

15,500

62,905

1,201,506

142,255

3,900

18,620

61555

1,237,319

144,680

3,900

18,620

61,555

Tot,1I Expenditures 1,479,337 1.267,615 1,402,176 1,427.836 1,468,074

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 11,272,146} _~...i.1940,351) $ (1,208,676) $ (1,222,336) $ (1.260,574)

C - 51

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Delail by Category


PURCHASING GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide Macomb County departmenls with goods and services from outside agencies, cenlral slores. multigraph printing,

interdepartmental mail services and microfilm/retention records.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual Amended Recommended Recommer'ded

Administration:

Managers & Supervisors 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0

Professional Support 20 2.0 2.0 1 0 10

Clerical Siaff 35 3.0 3.0 30 3.0

7.5 70 70 6.0 6.0

Prinl ShOp:

Clerical Staff 2.0 20 2D 2.0 20

20 20 2.0 2.0 20

Micro-film:

Managers & Supervisors 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Clerical Staff 4.0 30 30 3,0 3.0

5.0 4.0 40 40 4.0

Mail Services:

Clerical Staff 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 30

30 3.0 3.0 3.0 30

Central Stores: Managers,"" Supervisors 1.0 1 0 1.0 1.0 1 0

Clerical Siaff 2.0 10 1.0 1 0 1 0

3.0 20 2.0 20 20

Total Position Count ~O.5 18,0 18.0 17,0 17.0

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Admin,s(ra(lon , 583,265 $ 539,643 $ 557,320 $ 518,594 $ 528,407

Print Shop 251,629 212,515 249,400 258,732 263,867

Micro-film 280,488 196,875 252,076 273,224 282,070

Mail Services 180,794 178,448 185,305 205,273 213,143

Central Stores 183,161 140,138 158,075 172,013 178,587

Total $ 1,479,337 $ 1,267,615 $ 1,402,176 $ 1,427,836 $ 1,466,074

C - 52



PUBLIC WORKS GENERAL FUND PUBLIC WORKS

MISSiON STATEMENT:

To Qversee 8:o:isting County storm drains, as well as construction details of new drains. To operate the Chapa ton Pumping Station in

51. Clair Shores,


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Aclual Amended Recommended Recommended

Revenues:

Licenses & Permils , 23,044 , 38,960 $ 40,000 , 40,000 , 40,000


Reimbursements 1,066,252 1.218,065 1,725,510 2,045,987 2,081,991

Olher Revenue 631 65

Toli.'ll Revenues 1,445.001 1,904,607 2,118,280 2,554,013 2,615.017

Expenditures:

Personnel 4,533,615 4,441,198 4,670,576 5.444,460 5,557.343

Supplies & Services 45,086 36,607 58,176 60.085 60,597

Repairs & Maintenance 220 B 900 1.<00 900

Vehicle Operations 50.664 56.790 72,000 67}OO 68,200


Tl;>lal Ellpenditures 4,B57,226 4,692,211 4,949}14 5,729,780 5,844,878

Revenues Over (Under) Ellpendilures (3,412,225) (2,787,604) (2 ,B31.434) (3,175,767) (3,229,861 )

Other Financing Sl;>urces (Uses):

Transfers out (25,OOO)

Revenues Over (Under) Ellpenditures $(3,437,225) $(2.787.604) $(2,831,434) ~3.175,7(7) , (3,229, 8611

C - 53



PUBLIC WORKS GENERAL FUND PUBLIC WORKS

MISSION STATEMENT:

To oversee eXisting County storm drains, as well as construction details of new drains. To operate the Chapalon Pumping Stalion in

St Clair Shores.

POSITION TYPE

2009 Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

Commission;



Clerical Siaff

50

35,9

BO

46.9

5.0

32.5

6.0

43.5

4.0

305 50

39.5

4.0

30.5

50

39.5

4 a 30,5

5.0

39,5

Pump Station:



Clerical Staff

30

8.0

0.5

115

3.0

8.0

0.5

11.5

3.0

8.0

0,5

115

3 a 7 a 05

10.5

30

70

0.5

105

Wastewater Services Division: Managers & Supervisors


Clerica,l Siaff

3.0

4.0

7.0

30

6.0

90

3.0

6.0

90

Talai Position Count 60,4 55.0 580 59.0 590


Public Works Commission

Pump StaliM

Wastewater Services Division

$ 3,913,892

968,334

$ 3,745,119

947,092

$ 3,618,848

939,105

391,761

$ 3,685,893

1,087,179

956,708

$ 3,764,987

1,102,925

976,966

Total $ 4,882,226 $ 4,692,211 $ 4,949,714 $ 5,729,780 $ 5,844,878

C - 54



REFERENCE & RESEARCH CENTER GENERAL FUND LIBRARY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide reference and research material to Macomb County residents.


Revenues:

Reimbursements $

Audited

2009 Actual

$

2010 Actual A

$

2011 mended

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 90,201

Rec

, 2013

ommended

92,227

Expenditures:

Pe~onnel

Supplies & Services

Contract S€rvices

Inlernal Services

89,051

97,850

32,800

1,150

91,077

100,786

32,800

1.150


Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ $ $ $ (130.6501 $ (133,586)

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Statemenl No. 54, which requires any Special

Revenue Fund that receives <I substantial portion of its financial support from the General Fund to be accounted for as if

were part of the General Fund. The Reference and Rese2lrch Center receives more than 50% of its fin2lnci2l1 resourcl:!S from

Ihe Gener2l1 Fund and, therefore, meets the rl:!quirements of St2ltement No. 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, it will bl:!

budgeted for in the General Fund.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION T'fPE Actual Aclual Amended Recommended Recommended

Library Literacy: Managers & Supervisors ProfessiOnal Support 1.0 1 0 ClerlCilI Staff

Total Position Count 1 0 1.0


Administration $ $ $ $ 97.850 $ 100,786

Literacy Program 123,001 125,027

Total $ $ $ $ 220,851 $ 225,813



REGISTER OF DEEDS GENERAL FUNO GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT

To record and maintain all dD(;Ume,~(s oonceming real estate transactions with macomb county, as well as filing Uniform Commercial

Code documents which per1ain to ~n<lndng or personal property within Macomb counly.


Revenues:


Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Audited

2009 2010 AClual Actual

$ 4,487.113 S 3,908,622

12,531 11,238

2011 Amended

$ 4,909,000

50

BIJdgeled

2012 Reoommended

S 2,142,640

50

2013 Recemmended

S 2,153,040

50

Total Revenues 4,499,644 3.919.860 4,909,050 2.142.690 2.153.090

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Internal Services

1,401.496

94.542

40.332

1.280,550

89,866

27,513

1,426.865

184,102

1,000

27,107

1,562,735

184,102

1.000

27,030

1,603,506

184,102

1,000

27,il30

Total Exp.:mdilures 1,536.370 1,397,929 1,639,074 ,77'1,667 1,815,638

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 2,963,274 $ 2,521.931 $ 3,269,976 $ 367.823 $ 337,452

POSITION TYPE

2009

Aclual

2010

Aclual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended



Clerical Staff

10

20 22.0

10

20 220

1 0

2.0 210

1.0

20 21.0

10

20 21 0

Total Position Count 25.0 250 2'10 2'10 2'1.0

C - 56



REIMBURSEMENT GENERAL FUND ---cG~E~N~E~R~A~LGOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

In conjunction with Family Court Juvenile Division, 10 allempt to collect debts owed Macomb County.

Year Ended December 3',

Revenues:


Reimbursemenls

Other Revenue

$

AlJc!iled

2009 2010 Actual Aclual

194,432 $ 242,713

351,550 270.703 1,029

2011 Amended

$ 375,000

430.000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

S 275,000

430,000

2013 Recommended

$ 275,000

430,000

TOl31 Revenues 547,011 513,416 805,000 705,000 705,000

E:cpendilures:

PersOnne,'

Supplies So Services

Inlernal ServiC€s

705,101

21,854

41,488

646,457

22.881

22,431

735,589

32,900

20,881

785,306

31,800

20,681

805,082

31,800

20,681

Tolal Expenditures 766,443 691,769 789,170 83".737 857,563

Revenues Over (Under) El(penditures $ (221,432) $ (178,353) S 15,830 $ (132.787) $ (152,563)

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amellded

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

Managers So Supervisors


Clerk.al Siaff

1.0

3.0

9.0

10 30

80

1.0

30

80

1.0

30

8G

10

JO

8.0

Tolal Position Count 130 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0

C - 57

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN General Fund Detail by category

DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION RISK MANAGEMENT GENERAL FUND GENERALGQVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

Proactively respond 10 safely issLJes ,HId conditions in the work place. as well as prolection of the County against loss under

Insurance coverage.


Revenues:


Reimbursements

,

AL'diled

2009 Aclual

3,677 , 2010

ActLJElI

1.429

2011 Amended

, 5,457

Budgeled

2012 Recommended

, 2013

Recommended

,

Total Revenues 3,677 1.429 5.457

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Contract Services

Internal Services

279,926

14,570

14,199

320,262

12,490

2,500

8,442

341,035

10,226

5,000

7.867

359,370

10,226

5,000

7,867

.168,984

10,226

5,000

7.867

Tolal Expenditures

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures , 308,695

(305,018) :Ii (342.265)

343,694 364,129

, (358,672) , 382.463

{382,46l2. , 392,077

(392,O77)

POSITION lYPE

2<)09

Aclual

2010

Actulli

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

ManElgers & Supervisor.:;

Professionlll Support Clerical SllIH

1.0

2.0 1.0

1 0

20 10

10

20 1.0

1.0

20 1.0

1 0

20 , .0

10llli POs.ition Count 40 " 4.0 4.0 4.0

C·58



F& 0 - SECURITY GENERAL FUND PUBLIC SAFETY

MiSSION STATEMENT:

To provide adequale securing arid safe-guarding of all county-owned facilities.


Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Internal Services

Capital Outlay

Audited


$ 574,858 $ 420,394

99

6,845 5,947

199,578

2011 Amended

$ 448,123

2,980

500

5.585

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$

2013 Recommended

$

Tolal Expenditures $ 781,591 $ 427,440 $ 457,159 $ $

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

Menagers & Supervisors


Clerical Staff

1.0

90

1.0

5.0

1 0

70

Total Position Count 10.0 9.0 8.0

NOTE: This department was consolidated with Facilities and Operations beginning in 2012 in accordance with \he Organizational Plan developed by lhe Office of the County Executive.

c -59



SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES GENERAL FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide oulre(lch services, legal counsel. (lnd <ldull day services to the older population of Macomb County.


Revenues: Intergovernmental • Charges for Services

Reimbursements

Audited

2009 Aclu<ll

$

2.000

2010 Aclu,,1

32.000

A

•

2011 mended Re

5

Budgeted

2012 commended

346.1SB

210,062

2013 Recommended

• 352.096

210.562

Total Revenues 2.000 32,000 556,220 562.658

Expenditures:

Per.::oune.1

Supplies & Services


Contract Services

Internal Services

CapitalOIJtlay

1,487190 68.321

6,700

16,000

50.244

1,000

1,529,888

68,321

6,700

18,000

50.244

1.000

Total Expenditures 1,629.455 1,672,153

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures • 2,000 • 32.000 • 5 {1,1J73.235i • (1,109,49~

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Statement No, 54, whlctl requires any Special

Revenue Fund that receives a substantial portion of its financial support from ttle General Fund to be accounted lor as il

were part of ttle General Fund. Senior Citzens' Services receives more Ihan 50% of its financial resources from

the General Fund and, therefore, meets the requirements of Statement No. 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, il will be budgeled for in ttle General Fund.

C·60



SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES GENERAL FUNO HEALTH & WElFARE

MISSION SfATEMENT:

To provide outreach services, legal counsel, ..nd adult day servie;es to the older population 01 Macomb County.

POSITION TYPE

Senior Center & Administration;

Managers & SLJpervisors Professional Support

Cleric.:ll Staff

Legal Services; Professional Support Clerical Staff

Outreach: Professional Support Clerical Siaff

COunseling: Professional Support Clerit.al Siaff

Prescription Resource: Professional Support Clerical St3ff

Adult Day Services I: Proless,;onal Support CleriC<lI Staff

Adult Day Services II~

Prolesslonal Support Clerical Staff

Tolal Position Count

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Adminislr,,\ion Adult Day Services I Adult Day Services II Counseling Legal Services

Ou!re"ch Pre3cnplion Resource Network

TOlal

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

2.0

2.0

1.0

so

2.0

2.0

1.0

5.0

20 1.0 3.0

2.0 1 0 30

30 30

3.0 30

1.8 1 8

1.8 18

1.0 OS 1.5

1.0 05 1.5

60 '0 7.0

60 1.0 70

5.0 5.0

5.0 50

26.3 26,3

•

•

s

•

•

$ -

$ 474,243 260,866 165,020 159,020 262,404 223.718

84.184

$ t ,629,455

•

•

486.51l5 265,B 10 168,316 163,810 270,278 231,522

85,832

1,672.153

C·61


SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT FUND

GENERAL FUND

FUNCTION

PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To act as chief law enforcement officer and charged wilh preservation 01 peace within Macomb County.

Revenues:

Intergovernmental


Fines 8. Forfeitures

Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Audited


$ 230,000

10,394,699

25.386

1.982,839

16,366

$ 255.000

10;156.289

21,693

2.202,287

8,612


Budgeted

2011 Amended

2012 Recommended

$ 235.000

10.674,712

22.000 2,224,650

12,000

$ 235,000

10,674,712

22,000

2,224,650

12.000

2013 Recommended

$ 235,000

10,674,712

22,000

2,224,650

, 2 .000

Total Revenues 12.649.290 12,943,881 13,168,362 13,168,362 13,168.362

Expenditures: Personnel

Supplies & Services


Repairs 8. Maintenance

VehiCle Operations

Conlract Services

Internal Service,

CapitalOLlllay

49,505,724

2,538,096

23,407

231,576

658,797

5.960,012

1,256,399

6.019

45.265,626

2.656.250

26,3H

125,486

647,691

5.513,835

928,504

1,810

48,278.575

2,385,213

85,219

194,119

849,256

6,568,762

806.273

84,832

51,794,316

2,389,478

65,219

194,584

849,311

6.568,762

820.078

84,832

52.689,363

2.389.478

85,219

194,564

849,311

6.568,762

820,078

8.f ,832

Total Expenditures 60,180,030 55,165,576 59,252,249 __'_2,786,560 63,681,607

Revenues Over (Under) E",penditures $ (47,530,740) $ (42,221,695) $(46,083,8871.. $ (49,616.~ $ (50,513.245)

C - 62


SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT FUND

GENERAL FUNQ FUNCTION

PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To act as chief law enforcement officer and charged with preservalion of peace within Macomb County.

POSITION TYPE

2009 Actual

2009 Actual

AUdited

2010 Actual

2010

Actual


Budgeted

201' 2012 Amended Recommended

21)11 2012 Amended Recommended

2013 Recommended

2013

Recommended

Administration:



Clerical Staff

50

2.0

13.0

20.0

5.0

2.0 13.0 20,0

4.0

2.0

13.0 190

4.0

2.0

13.0 19,0

4.0

2.0

13.0

190

Marine Dil/ision:



Clerical Staff

4.0

4.0

40

40

4.0

4.0

4.0

40

4.0

4.0

Jail:


Profes~jonal Support

Clerical Staff

1 0 2295

19.0

249.5

1.0

217.5 19.0

237.5

1.0 213.5

1B.0 232.5

1.0

213.5

18.0 232.5

1 0

213.5 18.0

232.5

Laundry Trustee Detail:


Prolesslonal SUpp0l1 Clerical Staff

10

10

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

10

1.0

Proball/ Court Security:


Proressional Support

Clerical Slaff

1 0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Roving Security:



Clerical Staff

60

60

60

60

6.0

60

60

60

60

60

C - 63



SHERIFF GENERAL FUND PUBL,C SAFE TY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To act as chief law enforcement officer and charged with preservation of pea('.e Within Macomb County.

42nd District Court Security:

M<lnagers & Supervisors


Clencal StaR

Audited

2009 Actual

1 0

1 0

2010 Actual

10

1.0


Budgeted


1.0 1.0

1.0 1.0

2013 Recommended

1.0

1 0

Court Room S"curity:



Clerical Siaff

13.0

13.0

13.0

13.0

12.0

12.0

120

12.0

12.0

12.0

Foe Enrorcement: Managers & Superv'sors


Clerical StaH

50

50

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

50

Dakota Liaison:



Clericai Slill'f

1.0

1.0

10

1 0

1 0

1.0

1.0

1.0

10

10

R.oad Patrol:


,OrofeSSlonal Support

Clerical Staff

1.0 810

82,0

1 0

81.0

82.0

10

79.0

800

10

77.0

78,0

1 0

77,0

78.0

Township Palro's:

Managers & SLJpervisors

Professiol'al Support

Clerical' Staff

67,0

67.0

69.0

69.0

68.0

68.0

680

68,0

68.0

680

Surveillance Team:


ProfeSSional Support ~O 4.0 4.0 " "Clerical Siaff

4.0 4.0 4.0 " C - 64

4.0


SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT FUND GENERAL FUND

FUNCTION

PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To acl as chief law enforcement officer and charged with preservation of peace within Macomb County.


Aud'(ed Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ActlJal Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

Detective Bureau:

Managers 8. Supervisors 1.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 Professional Support 23.0 23.0 20.0 19.0 190

Clerical Slaff 1.0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0

25.0 250 22,0 21.0 21,0

K-9 Unit:


Professional Support 20 20 2.0 2.0 2.0

Clerical Staff

2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

Internel Crimes:

Managers &. Supervisors

Professional Support 30 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0

Clerical Staff

30 3.0 3.0 3.0 30

Tri·County Task force: Managers &. Supervisors

Professional Support 1.0 Clerical Staff

10

Grant Programs:

Managers a. Supervisors

Professional Support 11,0 11.0 11.0 11.0 110

Clerical Sl,aff 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10

12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 120

Total Positioll Coulll 497.5 4665 473.5 4705 470.5

C - 65


SHERIFF

DEPARTMENT FIJND

GENERAL FUND FUNCTION

PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To il<;:l as chief law enlorcemenloffll;:.er and charged will' preservation of peace within Macomb County.


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual AClual Amended Recommended Recommended


Operations , 2,074.004 S 1,530,083 , 1,942,644 , 1,942,644 , 1.942,644

Administration 1,726,088 1,546,949 1,661,994 1,781,814 1,814,058

Marine Division 764.406 617,101 613.025 633,769 641,914

Jail 31.953.233 29,345,655 32.166,764 33,585,085 34,056,477

Laundry Trustee Detail 100,544 96,266 104,277 110.733 113,158

Probale Caurt Security 112,570 105,193 103.802 109,620 111,268

Roving Security 745,184 686,332 719,771 752,168 763,609

42nd Court SecuNy 112,208 108,880 109,326 114,799 116,447

Court Room Security 1,518,793 1,426.098 1,350,483 1,426,707 1,446,483

FOC Enforcement 518,203 455,729 512,266 542,400 550,640

Dakota Liaison 103,797 98,238 99,799 107,289 108,937

Road Palrol 9,006.018 8,461,175 8,666,701 9,080,382 9.233,970

Lenox Town~hip Patrol 280,315 453,508 440.015 460,412 467,004

Harrison Township Palrol 1,142,120 1,035,759 1,144,460 1,189,548 1,208.359

Washington Township Patrol 668,002 639,703 657,698 687.626 698,290

Macomb Township Palrol 2,395,595 2.379,059 2,336,181 2,626.051 2,667,840

Surveillance Team 543.976 497,855 493.448 508,911 515,503

Detective Bureau 3,030,240 2,540,965 2,772,188 2,806,206 2,843,144

K-9 Unit 272,691 245,845 258,991 270.686 273,982

Internet Crime Unit 309,991 303,503 334.132 350,999 355,943

MI. Clemens Disoatcll 294.167 317.620 313.959 334,538 341,130

MI. Clemens PatrOl 1,921,128 1.775,132 1,928,665 1,939,466 1,974,568

Contract Patrol Supervisors 510,025 498,928 521,660 543.335 551,481

Court Building Safely 881,372 884,758

Tri-County Task Force 76,732

Total $ 60,180,030 $ 55,165,576 $ 59.252.249 , 62,786.560 , 63,681,601

c -66



TECHNICAL SERVICES GENERAL FUND PUB LtC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

To coordinale, design. implement and ma,'ntain the governmental two-way radio communicalions system for Macomb County aoo

its sub entities


Revenues: Charges for Services

Reimbursemenls

Audited

2009 2010 Actual Acl\lal

$ 375,771 $ 312,482

7,519 5,351

2011 Amended

$ 396,500

29,000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$

2013 Recommended

$

Total Revenues 383,290 317.843 425,500

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Utilities


Vehicle Operations

Internal Services

681,938

4,055

7,736

7.498

32,109

626,767

3,769

10,041

7,280

19,617

638,249

5,663

8,450

8,500

18,179

Tot<ll Expenditures 733,336 667,474 679,041

Revenues Owr(Under) Expenditures $ (350,046) -.-1i349,631) ~3,541) $ $

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended


ProfE'ssional Support

Clerical Slaff

1.0

70

1.0

1.0

60

10

1.0

60 1 0

Tot<ll Position Count 9.0 8.0 60

NOTE: This department was consolidated with Emergency Man<lgemem beginning in 2012 in accordance with the

Organizalional P1>m developed by the Office 01 the County Executive.



TREASURER'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To ao;;l as custodian of the monies and securities of the County_ Files Uniform Commercial Code documents per1alning to ~nancing

01 personal property within the County.


Audited Budgeted


Revenues;

licenses & Pemllts $ 825 • 700 $ 400 I 400 $ 400

Charges for Services 26,260 29J76 28.000 26,300 26,300

Fines & Forfeitures 1.232 329 1,000 1,000 1,000

Reimbursements 148 100 100 100

TOl,,1 Revenues 28,465 14,O~5 29,500 27,800 27,800

Expenditures;

Personnel 1,828,507 1,811,947 1,956,127 2,072,019 2.121,838

Supplies & Servic:es 74,324 71,025 84.341 115,239 121,239

Repairs & Mair.!enance 104 816 500 500

Vehicle Operations 2,178 2.707 3,700 4.000 4.200

Internal Services 97,164 48.533 44,573 44,573 14,940

Total Expenditures 2,002,173 ~4.316 2,089,557 2.236,331 2,262,717

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures ~3,708) (1,920,2721 (2,060,057) (2,208,531 ) (2,234,917)


Trarlsfers in - Other Funds 59,775

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $(1,973,708) $(1,920,270) $ (2,000,282) I (2.208,531 ) I (2,23...917)

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Ac(ual Aclual Amended ReCommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0

Professloml Support 80 7.0 7.0 70 70

Clerical SlaH 19.0 17,0 17.0 17,0 17.0

Total Position Count 29.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0

C - 68



WATER QUALITY BOARD GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

Thl? Water Quality Board served as advisors 10 the Board ot Commissioners regarding water quality Issues in the County unl,;1 mid-2011, when i! was dissolved in accordance with the organizational pla,1 developed by the County E;o:€culiv€.


Audited Budgeted


Expenditures:

Supplies & Services $ 1,664 , 1,441 , 4,481 , $

Revenues Over (Under) expenditures , (1,664) $ (1,441) $ (4,481) $ ,

c - 69



NON - DEPARTMENTAL GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT


Audited Budgeled

2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 Actual ACluai Amended Recommended Recommended

Revenues:

Property Ta~es $138,020,133 S 126.586,902 , 114.2017,307 S 108,534,9'12 S 106,364,24)

Licenses & Permits 74,315 67,693 BO,OOO 80,000 80,000

Inlergovernmenlal 2,365,592 2,214,828 1,915,596 13,000.000 13,000,000

Charges IDr Ser\'jces 134,245 134,2015 134,745 1,734,245 1,934,245

Inveslmenllncome 1,429,987 822,316 2,150,000 400,000 400,000

Reimbursemenls 1,360

Indirect Cos! Allocalion 9,120,572 10,257,636 8,410,734 8,000,000 8,ClOO.000

Olher Revenue 552 150,000 100,000 100,000

Total Revenues 151,146,204 140,064,172 127,088,362 131,849,187 129,878,488

E:rpendilur~s;

Personnel 27,837 49,1317 606,957

Supplies &. Services (see appendix) 4,956,703 1,195,669 1,573,2013 1,666,600 1,666,600

Capital Outlay 270,270 359,800 375,000 375,000 375,000

Total E..pendilur~s 52~.810 1,606,266 2,557,165 2,041,600 2,()41 ,600

Rev~nues Over (Und~r) ExpendilureS 145,1391,394 138,477,886 12</,531,217 129,807,587 127,636,8136


Tran~rers in (see append,x) 24,758,276 24,782,533 26,201,073 18,213,296 8,655,ODD

Transfers OUllsee appendiX) (60,150,569) \52,875,63(3) (56,595,608) (37,2Bl,458) (37,466.513)

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses): (35,392,293) (28,093,105) (30,394,535) (19,074,162) (213.1311,513)

,Revenues Oyer (UnderJ Expenditures $110,499,101 S 110,384,7131 S 94,136,682 , 110,733,425 99,025,375

C - 70



OPERATING TRANSFERS GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Year Ended D€cemb,,, 31.

Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2012 2013 Arlual Ac(ual 2011 AmendEed R"o:ommended RecDlnmenood

Operating Transrers In:

Delinquenl Personal Propert¥ T~x Revolving Fund , 20,OaO , 20.000 , 20,000 5 20.000 , 20,000

Delinquent Real Property Tax Revolving Fund 6,635,000 8,714.216 6,635,000 6.685.000 8.635,000

Departmefl( of Human Services 97.~(l2

Health Depanmenl 1,:'01.736

Law Library 14,990

Reference & Research Center 545,064

Revenue Shanng Reserve Fund 16,096,607 16QA8,317 16,385,33;> 4,656,551

Sen,or Citizen Services 24,786

Olher Funds 6,669 1.16D,741 2.467,667

Total Revenues 2.. ,758276---- 24,782.533 26,201,073 16.213.296 8,655,000

Ope"lling Transf~rs Oul:

Adull Drug C')urt 185,479 196,595 195,362 196,595 196.595

Capital Improvemenl Fund 6,836,545 "'500,000 8,500,000 3,970,4LJO 3,980,538

Child Care Fund 17,622,441 13,247,136 15,&196['16 14.549,760 14,569,616

Communlly Correchon~ 339)45 363,415 360,9,~6 365,062 3138,673

Communily Menlal He"IIh 4.328,973 4,063,421 4,03u 600 3,909682 3,909,682

Commumty Services 560,057 564,167 569,414 487946 487,948

Debt Service Furld G,947376 6,937,240

Friend of Ihe Court 6,316,803 5,5&8,417 5,663,926 3,125124 3,272,631

He~lIh Departmenl 12,590,209 11526,14:. 13,676.764

Heallh Department - Cigarelte Ta' 138,529 91,852

Health Granl Fund 55;'.0% 262,675 366,213 534,566 538,382

H,swr;cal Commission 5,ODO 4,500 4,500

Law LIbrary 1~H9fl 15,780 20,OLJO

Martha T, Berry Medical Care Fac,lity B~6,9?9 1 ()I)O,OOO

MSU ExtenslC\n Granls 7,500 30,000

p" 403,804 70.727 97,507 262.507 262,507

Plannin9 & Econ'Jmic De',elopmenl Granls 225.381 292,798 225,000 225,[)(Ju 225,000

Proseculmg Attorney Gran!, 877,803 ~l2.i:ng 824,533 860,127 877,617

Re~eafch Il. Reference Cenler 1,493,722 1,017,016 1,037,941

R€~,denl Counly Hospilalizalion 934,247 1,209,757 1,112,434

Reliree Health Care Savings 2,467,687

Senior Cilizens SerVices 1.0S9,72& 600,361 1,(123&11

Sheriff Grilnls 86>1,30& 677,753 800,000 773.07B 794,671

Substance Al;>use - Liquor Tax 1,447,198 1,042,352 999,653 945.>186 910,966

Subslanc", Abu~" - Operations 134,24: 134,245 134,245 134.215 134,245

Walerway Cleanup 100,000 100,000 100,000

Other Prcgram:; 5,283 31,233

Total Expenditures $ 60,150,569 1 52,875,638 , 56,595.&08 , 37,287.458 • 37.466.513

Rllvllnues Over (Und~r) Expenditures $(35.392293) $(28,093,105) $ (30,3'l45351 , {19,074,162) $ (28.Bl1,5 13)

c - 71


DEPARTMENT

APPROPRIATIONS

FUND GENERAL FUND

FUNCTION

GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Appropriations - Outside AgenciesIA~50ciation&

8 Mile Boulevard AssOCiation

Area Agency on Aging

Are" Wide Qualily Coo{fol

Aulornel'on Alley

CARE HOU58

Clinlon Ri~er Walemhed Council

De!rort Regional Chamber

Mlchigarl ASSOCiation of Coun(ie~

Nallonal AssOCI~lion of Counties

Police TreIning cenl['r

SE Mf RC 8. 0 COUflCIi

SEMCOG

Soil ConServation

Sheam Gauge

TurnIng POint - $ANE

,

Audited


4,95V $ 4,950

53,352 54,953

18,970 19,075

15,000 lEo,OOO

25,000 <'5.000

5,000 5,orjQ

67,000 67,000

40,71S ~0,71S

16.270 18.271

25,000 ns 500 500

270,274 259.463

~3,650 13.650

74,700 77,280

30,000 30,000

'fear Ended December 31.

Eludgeled


$ 4,950 $ 4,950

%,602 60,000

20,000 20,OuD

15,000 15,0UO

25,000 25,(100

5,000 5,000

67,000 67,000

~ 1,733 42,000

17,368 18.000

25,000 25,000

500 000

275.679 260.000

13,650 1HJ5fJ

057,130 8~,aOfJ

30,000 30,000

2013 Recommended

, 4,950

60,000

20,000

15,000

25,000

5,000

67,000

~2,000]

18,000

25000

500

280,000

13,650

85,00a

30,OUO

1390,381 029,082 1384,612 891,100 691,100

AppropriatiDfls - Olher Annual Audll

C('>nlingency

Employee Assistance Program

Execullve Transition

Manegemeflt Services De~elopmenl Costs

Short Term Ta~ Bond

Stale Forensic Evaluation Cenl~r

98,200

16,536

3,744,197

407,389

102,200

1~,250

10,192

440.9~5

106,288

500,000

12,500

39,808

5,OfJO

225000

11(j,500

500,000

15,000

35D,DUO

110,500

500,000

15,000

350,000

~,266,322 557,587 888,5% 975,500 975,500

TDlal Expendilures $ ~,!)513703 , 1, 1913,1313~ , 1,573,206 $ 1,666,600 S 1.61313,1300

C ·72

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Special Revenue Fund Delail by Category


COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS GRANTS PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT'

To pro~'jde effective,local, community-based alternatives to incarteration that promote pUblic safely, hold offef1ders accountable,

8'ld improve their ability to live lawfully and productively in the communily.


Personnel

Supplies & Services I

Audited

2009 Aclual

63,389 $

11,100

2010 Actual

63)369

4,189

$

2011 Amended

66,879

1,373

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

I 69,949

2013 Recommended

I 71.597

Total Expenditures 74,489 68,058 68.252 69,949 71,597

Revenues Over (Under) Expendilures (74,489) (68.058) (68,252) (69,949) (71,597)

Other Financing Sources (USl:!s):

Transfers in - General Fund 74,489 68,058 68,252 69,949 71,597

Tolal Other Fin(!lm;;ing Sources (Uses): 74,489 68,058 68,252 69,949 71,597

Net Increase (Decrease) In Fund Balance

Fund Balance, Beginning of Year

Fund Bal(!lnce, End of Year I I $ I I

POSI110N TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Aclual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended



Clerical Slaff

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10

Total Position Counl 1.0 10 1 0 1 0 10


Tether Program

Total

I

I

74,489

74,489

$

I

68,058

68,058

I

I

68,252

68,252

I

I

69,949

69,949

I

I

71,597

71,597

0-1

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Special Revenue Fund Detail by Category


COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY COMMUNITY SERVICES HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

Ma~Dmb Courlly Community Services Agerlcy provides help services to all res,d"'nts of Macomb County through a variety or sl>'lte

end {eder31 programs.


Re\lenues:

Intergovernmental


Olher Revenue

AUdited


, 1.147,170 , 3,181.051

48,112 41.356

122,877 15,903

2011 Amended

$ 5,325,170

33,542

11,000

Re

,

Budgeted

2012 commended

200,000

43,260

10,000

Rec

, 2013

ommended

200,000

43,260

10,000

Total Rellenues 1,318,159 3,238,320 5.369,712 253,260 253,260

EJlpendilures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


Repairs &. Maintenance

Vehicle OpE:rallons

Conlract Services

Internal Services

Capital Outlay

207,958

787.753

8,510

135 3.108

109,943

17,023

50,858

526,857

666.279

95.972

5,171

1,845,705

25,394

68,678

1.020,185 406.982

9,943

1,665

'0,221 3,957,121

35,605

44,196

31.355

293,680

1,220

32,599

293,680

1,220

Tolal Expenditures 1,185,288 3,234,056 5,465.918 326,255 327,499

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 132.871 4,264 (116,206) (72,995) (74.239)


Transfers oul (30,696) (60,000) (60,000)

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses}: (30,696) (60,000) (60,000)

Nellncrease (Decrease) in Fund Balance

Fund Balance. Beginning 01 Year

102,175

327,897

4,264

__430,072

(116,206)

434,336

(132,995)

318,130

(134.239)

185,135

Fund Balance, End of Year , 430,072 , 434,336 , 318,130 , 185,135 , 50,896

D - 2



COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY COMMUNITY SERVICES HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

Macomb County Community Services Agency provides help services to all 'e~ldenls or Macomb CounlY through a va"eiy of slaLe

and rederal prograr~s_

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Ac;lual Actual Amended Recommended Recommended

MI Enrolls:



Clerical Staff 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 10

1.0 1.0 1.0 1 0 1 0

ARRA:


Professional Support 30 60 6.0

Clerical Staff 1.0 20 20

4.0 80 SO



Audited Budgeted


EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Access Cenlers Arner Recovery Reinvesl Acl

• 3,761 404,177

$ 10,820 2,574,068

$ 017,206 5,129,898

$ 83,680 • 83,680

EFSP ARRA 166,909 254,279 FEMA-Emergency Food & Sheller 576,084 352,836 195,272 200,000 200,000 IDA 10,829 10,000 10,000 10,000 Michigan Enrolls 49,705 31,224 33,542 62,575 63,819 REACH 15,348 30,000 30,000

Tolal $ 1,215,984 $ 3,234,056 $ 5,485,918 $ 386,255 $ 387,499

0-3


DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DHS FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Department of Human Ser'l'ices provides public assistance, child and family welfare support to residents of the Slate through a

network of over 100 county dep<lrtmenl of human service offk;es lhroughoullhe stale.


Audited Budgeted


Revenues;

Intergovernmental $ 1,138,529 , 1,194,622 , 1,500,000 , $

Reimbursements 327,915 290,361 400,000

Tolal Revenues 1,466,444 1,484,963 1,900,000

E)(penditures:

Supplies & Services 2,400,691 2,694,739 3,012,434

Total Expenditures 2,400,691 2.694.739 3,012.434

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures -------.l£l34,247) ( 1,209,756) (1,112,434)


Transfers in . General Fund 934,247 1,209,756 1,112,434

Transfers out (97,482)

Tot;,1 Other Financing Sources (Uses): 934,247 1,209,756 1,112,434 (97,482)

Nel Jncrease {Decrease} in Fund Balance (97,482)

Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 97,482 97,482 97,482 97,482

Fund Balance, End of Year , 97,482 , 97,482 $ 97,482 , ,

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Statement No, 54, which requires any Special Revenue Fund that receives a substantial portion of Its linancial support from the General Fund to be accounted for as if were part of the General Fund. The Department of Human Services receives more than 50% of its financial resources from the General Fund and, thererore, meets the requirements of Statement No. 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, it will be budgeled for in the General Fund.



HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The COUr"lty Health Department guards and protects [he health and well·being of Macomb County residents through the promoUon of

sale. healthful living and by assislil1g those in need of heallh care.


Revenues:

Licenses & Permits

Inlergovernmental

Charges lor Services

Reimbursements

Indirec\ Cost Allocalion

Other Revenue

,

Audited


941.563 , 1,015.790

3.171,335 4.Q90.669

2,028,231 2,143.155

7,956 9.737 162,018 266,892

88,947 50,083

2011 Amended

, 948,501

2,062,894

2,272,715

6,420

208,178

65.525

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$

2013 Recommended

,

Tolal Revenues 6,400,050 7,576.326 5,566,233

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Conlerences & Training

RepairS & Maintenance

Vehicle Operations

Contract Services

Internal Services

Capital Oullay

12,116.125

2,994.958

400

19.532

101,896

585,894

3,194,236

26,509

11,1138.221

3.740,846

3,085

24,121

101,581

535,665

3,416,662

97,637

12,962.786

2,254,184

29,583

23,054

116,083

960.636

2,833,570

289.851 --_._--

Totlll Ell.penditures 19,039,550 19,108,018 19,469,747

Revenues Over (Under) Expendilures ~9.500) (11,531.692) (13.903.514 )

Other Fin1lncing Sources (Uses):

Tr1Insfers in - General Fund

Transfers oul

12,728.738

(3,238)

11.617.997

(15,555)

13,676.764

(1,501,736)

To!'!1 Other Finllncing Sourclls (Uses): 12.725,500 11,602.442 13.676,764 (1,501.736)

Net Increase (Decrellse) in Fund Balance

Fund Balance, Beginnin9 of Yellr

86,000

1.571,736

-f(1.750

1,657.736

(226,750)

1.728,486

(1.501,736)

1,501,736

Fund BlIlance, End of Year $ 1.657,736 , 1,728,486 $ 1,501,736 , $

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Slatement No. 54, which requires any Special

Revenue Fund that rl!ceives a substantial portion of its financial support rrom the General Fund to be accounted for as if

were part of the General Fund. The Health Department receives more lhan 50% of its linancial resources from the

General Fund and, therefore, meets the requirements of Statement No. 54. Accordingly. beginning in 2012, it will

be bUdgeted for in the Generlll Fund.



HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH FUND --~H;;CE~ALc';T"H'& W"EL"F"Ac;Rc;E-

MISSION STATEMENT:

The COWlly Health Department guards and pmteels lI1e health and well-being of Macomb County residents through the promo~on of

safe, healthful living and by assislir<glhose in need of healll1 care.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Actual Amended Recommended RecDIllmended

Administration:

Managers & Supervisors 5.0 5.0 5.0

ProfeSSional Support 2.0 20 1.0

Clerical Siaff 50 5.0 5.0

12.0 12.0 11.0

Health Educator


,Prafessional Suppar1 5.0 5.0 5.0 Clerical Staff

5.0 5.0 5.0

EMRAP:


Professional Support 30 30 3.0

Clerical Staff 1.0 1.0 1.0

40 40 4.0

Environmental Health

Managers &- Supervisors 8.0 8.0 7.0

Professional Support 31.0 28.0 280

Cleflc.al Staff 6.0 5.0 50

450 41.0 40.0

PHS ADMIN:

Managers & SupervisGrs 1.0 1.0 1.0

Professional Support 2.0 2.0 20

Clerir..al Staff 1.0 1.0 1.0 40 4.0 40

Nulriljon:


Professional Supp<Jrt 20 2.0 20

Clerir..al Staff

20 2.0 20



HEALTH DePARTMENT HEALTH FUND HEALTH 8. WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Health Department guard~ and protects the healln and well-being 01 Maoomb County residents through the promotion of

safe, healthful living and by assisting thQs€ in need of health care

POSITION TYPE

Clinical Health Set'\lices:



Clerical Staff

Denial:

Managers Ii Supervisors


Clerical Siaff

Maternal/Child Health Ser\iices

Managers 8. Supen.isors


Clerical Staff

Vision & Hearing:

Managers 8. SUperviSOrS

Professional Suppon

Clerical Slaff

Cardio Oise<lse Risk Reduction:

M<ln<lgers 8. Supervisors


Clerical Staff

Medical Examiner



Clerical Staff

2009 Ac(ual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

1.0

16.0

10.0

270

10

16.0

90

26.0

1.0

16.0

9.0

26.0

4.5

1.0

5.5

4.5

1.0

5.5

4.5 1 0

55

20.0

10.0

30.0

18.0

100

26.0

17.0

10.0

27.0

1.0

9.0

2.0

12.0

1.0

8.0

2.0 11.0

10

80

2.0

11.0

40 4.0 '.0

40 4.0 4.0

15

8.0 10

105

'5

8.0 1 0

105

1 5

8.0

1 0

105

• •


DEPARTMENT FUND fUNCTION HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Heahh Department guards and protects the health and well-being of Macomb County residents through the promotion of

safe. heallhfulliving and by assisting those in need of heallh care.

POSITION TYPE

Communicable Disease:



Clerical Staff

AllImal Shelter:



Clerical Staff

Senior Servic;es:



Clerical Slaff

Total Position COllnl

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Administration Education EMRAP Eoyironrnenl..al Heallh PHS Admin Nutrition Clinical Heallh Services Dental Maternal/Child Health Services Computer Project Vision & He;oring Cardio Disease Risk Reduclion Medical Elaminer Communicable Disease Animal Shelter Senior Services Child Health Fair

Total

2009 2010 2011

Actual Actual Amended

1.0 1 0 1.0

10.0 90 90

110 10.0 10.0

35 35 35

11.0 90 90

20 2.0 2.0

16.5 14.5 14,5

40 4.0 4.0

1.0 1 0 1.0

5.0 5.0 5.0

193.5 182.5 1795 ==

, 3.126,491 • 1,611,897 • 2,044,463 402.827 420,583 466,563 391.716 429,525 490,439

4.059,153 4,103,016 4,257,705 489,250 530,460 519,778 184,860 198,233 212,584

3,181,836 4,364,410 2,836,211 376,818 410,662 481,093

2,222,204 2,127,878 2,388,316 8,943 50,686 176,458

519,196 577,274 700,148 323,590 340,300 383.037

1,030,673 1.1~2,O14 1,307,206 814,475 1.017.400 990,690

1,551,301 1,417,462 1,683,776 359,455 381,773 531,280

$ 19,042,788 $19,123,573 $ 19,469,747

2012 2013

Recommended Recommended

1,501,736

, 1,501.736 •

D·'



HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH GRANTS FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT

The County H€<lllh Department guards and protects [he health and well-being of Macomb County residents Ihrough the promotion of

Year Ended Oecember 31,

Revenues:

Intergovernmental


Reimbursements

I

Audited

2009 Actual

1,088,514 I 50

6

2010 Actual

710,173

50,000

I

2011 Amended

1,269,440

5,000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

I 904,997

2013 Recommended

I 543.416

TDlal Revenues 1,088,570 760,173 1,274,440 904,997 543.416

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services


COIltract Services

Internal Services

Capital Outlay

89,528

588.933

1,061

520,287

400

18,814

176,463

403,321

174,565

400

776

602,639

576,363 8,571

335.522

7.332

5,995

415,704

435,249

8,283 159,261

6,400

1,000

180,734

361,399

283

67,500

400

1,000

Total Expendilures 1,217,023 755,525 1,536,422 1,025,897 611,316

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures __(128,453) 4,648 __(26 1,982) (120,900) (67,900)

Other FInancing Sources (Uses):


Transfers out 192,068

(188.830\

15,555

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses); 3,238 15,555

Nellncrease (Decrease) In Fund Balance


(125,215)

688.491

20,203

563,278

(261,982)

583,479

i1Z0,900j

321,497

(67,900)

200,597

Fund Bafance, End of Year I 563,276 I 583,479 I 321,497 I 200,597 I 132.697

D9

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Special Revenue Fund Detai! by Category


HEALTH DEPARTMENT HEALTH GRANTS FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The County Health Department guards and protects the heallh and well-being of Macomb County residents through the promotion of



LAW LIBRARY LAW LIBRARY FUND JUDICIAL

MISSION STATEMENT~

To provide legal reference materials 10 Macomb County residents as well as local attorneys and attorneys employed by th€ Counly_

____--:--:c-:- ~y,l:!ar Ended December 3,,'c'~-;-c-c---------

Revenues: Fines & Forfeitures

Reimbuf&emenls

I

2009 Actual

Audited

8,500 I 2,420

2010 Actual

8,500

2,717

I

2011 Amended

8,500

3,000

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

I

2013 Recommended

I

Total Revenues 10,920 11,217 11,50D

Ellpenditures:

Supplies & Services

Internal Services

28,546

1,872

25,125

1,872

29,628

1,872

Tolal E)lpenditures 30,418 26,997 31,500

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (19.<198) (15, 7801 (2D,DDO)

Other Financing Soun:es (Uses):

Transrers in - Genera! FlJnd

Transrers Qut

19,498 15,780 20,000

114,990)

Total Other Financing Soun:es (Uses): 19,498 15,780 20,000 (14,990)

NellncreasfJ (Decrease) in Fund Balance

Fund Balance, Beginnin9 of Year 14,990 14,990 14,990

(14,990)

14,990

Fund Balance, End of Year I 14,990 I 14,990 I 14,990 , I

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Standards Board recently issued Statement No, 54, which requires any Special

Revenue Fund that receives a substanlial portion of its linancial support from the General Fund to be accounled for as if

were part of the General Fund, The Law Library receives more than 50% 01 ifs financial resources from the General Fund

and, therefOre. meets the requiremen!s of Statement No, 54, Accordingly, be9inning in 2012, it will be budgeted for in the

General Fund,

o - 11



MICHIGAN WORKS MACOMBIST. CLAIR TRAINING HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide specialized services designed to integrate adults and youth facing barriers \0 employment into the labor force through

customer-driven [raining and employment support services which will improve their quality of life and enhance their edu<:.ational skills.


Revenues:

Charges for Services S

Audited

2009 Aclual

3,979,998 $

2010 Actual

4,365,018

2011 Amended

$ 4,467,645

Budgeled

2012 Recommended

$ 4,120,104

2013 Recommended

$ 4,120,104

Total Revl.'nues 3,979,998 4,365,018 4,467,645 4,120,104 4,120,104

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Inlernal Services

3,841,086

48.634

90,278

4.293,533

47,648

115,010

4,306,516

50,000

111,129

3.958,975

50,000

111,129

3,958,975

50.000

111.129


Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (91,173)


Transfers in - Olher Funds 91,173

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses): 91,173 ----

Ne\ Incre<lse (Decrease) in Fund Balance

Fund Bal<lnce, Beginning of Ye<lr

Fund Balance, End of Year , $ $ $ $

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012 Recommended

2013

Recommended



Clerical Siaff

5.0

63.0

50

63.0

5.0

63.0

50

63.0

50

630

Total Position Count 680 68,0 68.0 68.0 68.0

0-12



REFERENCE & RESEARCH CENTER REFERENCE & RESEARCH FUND LIBRARY

MISSION STATEMENT"

Te prOVide reference and research maleriallo Macomb County residents.


Revenues:


Fines & Forfeitures

Reimbursements

Other Revenue

,

Audiled

2009 Actual

1,020 , 3,937

66,289

12,646

2010 Actual

16

83,323

2,301

2011 Amended

$

87,267

Re

,

Budgeted

2012 commended Rec

, 2013

ommended

Total Revenues 83,B9~ 85,640 87,267

EJ;penditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

1,140,954

371,115

761,914

290.372

761,406

326,700

Conlerelxes & Training 1,000

Utilities 9.096 4,290 10,000

Repairs & Maintenance 330 500

Contract Services 32,800 32,800 32,800

Internal Services 23,649 22,950 22,950

Capital OUllay 5,000

Total E;1tpenditures 1,577,614 1.112,656 1,160,356

Revenues Over (Under) E;1tpenditures (1,493,722) (1,027,016) (1,073,OB9)


Transfers In - General Fund 1,493,722 1,027,016 1,037,941

Transfers oul (545,06'1)

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses): 1,493,722 1,027,016 1,037.941 (545.064)

Net IrJl;rease (Decrease) In Fund Balanl;€ (35,148) (545,064)

Fund Balanl;€. Beginning of Year __580,212 580,212 560,212 545,064

Fund Balance, End of Year $ 580,212 $ 580,212 $ 545,054 , ,

NOTE: The Governmenlal Accounting Slandards Board recently issued Stalemenl No. 54, which requires any Special Revenue Fund lhal receives a substantial portion 01 its financial support Irom the General Fund to be <Iccounted for as if were part of the Gener<ll Fund. The Reference & Research Cenler recl:!ives more than 50% of its financial resources from the General Fund and, lherefore, meets the requirements of Stalemenl No. 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, it wilt be bUdgeted for in the General Fund.

D·13




MISSION STATEMENT-

To provide refefence and research material to Macomb County residents.

POSITION TYPE

2009

Actual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013 Recommended

Administration:



Clerical Staff

'0 1.0

2.0

40

10

10

30

1.0

4.0

Circulabon:



Clerical Staff

1 0

1.0

2.0

10

1,0

Information Technology:




1.0

1.0

AcqUlslions:



Clerical Staff

1.0

2.0

30

, .0

1 0

Reference Services:



Clerical Staff

10

1.0

1.0

10

Library for tile Blind:


ProfessiOf'>al Support

Clerical Staff

20

20

40

2.0

2.0

4.0

2.0

2.0

4.0

0-14




MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide reference and research maleriallo Macomb County residents.

POSITION TYPE

2009

Aciual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012 Recommended

2013

Recommended

Library Literacy:



Clerical Siaff

10

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Tolal Position Counl 16.0 100 9.0


Adminislrali()n

Circulation

Information Technology

Acquisitions

Reference Services

Library for the Blind

Pages/Extra Hire

Literacy Program

$ 368,846

139,711

291,444

177,791

211,099

271,497

7,048

110,176

, 185,934

133,933

38,649

80,687

341,358

220,005

112,030

, 751,622

288,667

120,067

, 545,064 $

Total $ 1,577.614 $1,112.656 $ 1,160,356 $ 545,064 ,

0-15



REGISTER OF DEEDS REMONUMENTATION GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

Through the provision or Public Acts 345 and 346 of 1990. to provide grant funds for the purpose or locating and Inspecting existing

monuments and remonumenllhe entire stale.


Revenues:

Intergovernmental $

Audited

2009 Actual

260,661 $

2010 Actual

211,659 $

2011 Amended

198,301

Budgeted

2012 Recommended

$ 200,000

2013 Recommended

$ 200.000

Tolal Revenues 260,661 211,659 196,301 200,000 200,000

Expenditures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services

Contract Services

Internal Services

19,219

3,750

237,167

525

19,237

2,552

189.406

464

695

197,606

1.000

199,000

1,000

199.000


Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures


Fund Balance, Beginning or Year

Fund Balance, End of Year $ $ $ $ $

0-16



REGISTER OF DEEDS TECHNOLOGY FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

Through the provisions of Public: Acl696 of 2002, this fund receives $S per document processed for the continued upgrade of

technology in the Register of Deeds office.


Audited Budgeled

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Aclual Actual Amended Recommended Rer..ommended

Revenues:

Charges for Services $ 699,405 $ 723,220 , 700,000 , 700,000 , 700,000

Investment Income 65}O~ 6,991

Tolal Revenues 765,108 730,211 700,000 700,000 700,000

Expenditures:

Personnel 132,749 81,115 66,250 66,250 66,250


Contract Services 1.260,252 1,002,698 602,300 602,300 602,300

Inlernal Services 1,000 1,000 1,000

Capilal Outlay 46,049 6,772 5,000 5,000 5,000

T01201 Expenditures 1,448,376 1,107,074 700,000 700,000 700,000

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (683,268) (376,863)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (683,268) (376,863)

Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 4.058,385 ~5,117 2,998,254 2,998,254 2,998,254

Fund Balance, End of Year $ 3,375,117 $ 2,998,254 $ 2,998,254 $ 2,998,254 $ 2,998,254

0-17



NON DEPARTMENTAL REVENUE SHARING RESERVE FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT


Audited Budgeled


Revenues;

Investment Income $ 843,359 $ 61.032 $ , $

Tolal Revenues 843,359 61,032

Revenues Over (Under) Ellpenditures 843,359 61,032


Transfers out {16,09B,507} (16,048,317) (16,385.0001 (4,856,883)

Tolal Other Financing Sources (Uses): (16,096, 6D"U. (16,048,317) (16.385,000) (4.856,883)

Net Increase (Decreasp-) in Fund Balance (15.253,248) (15,987,285) (16,385,OOO) (4,856,B83)

Fund Balance. Beginning 01 Year 52,482.416 37,229,16a 21,241,883 4.856,883

Fund Balance, End of Year •37,229,168 $ 21.241.883 $ 4,856.863 $ $

D· 16

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Special Revenue Fund Detail by Calegory


SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES SENIOR SERVICES HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide oulre<lch services, legal coL.ln~1. and adult day services 10 the older population of Macomb County.


Rev&nu&!O

Inlergovemmenlal


Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Audiled

$

2009 Actual

97,547

~84.8~O

15

23.134

$

2010 Actual

12u,209

512,989

21,693

2011 Amended

5 116.662

581,477

BUdgeted

2012 Recommended

$

2013 Recommended

$

Total Revenues 605,536 654.891 696,339

Ellpl!ndilures:

Personnel

Supplies & Services



Contract Services

Inlemal Servic.es

Capital' QlIliay

1.327,255

181.049

927

599

32,063 102,908

11

1,205,455

185,976

1,086

20,796

49,032

B

1,444.792

215,106

5,800

16,000

50,151

9,906

Tolal Expenditures 1,644,612 1,462,355 1,741.755

Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,039,276) _--,(B",,07 ,464) (1,043.4161..


Transfers in - General Fund


Transfers oul

1,046,450

5,0~8

(5,0481

799,515

3.264

(3,264 )

1,023,611

(8,679) (2~,786)

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses): 1,046,450 799,515 1.014.932 __--'(24,786)


Fund Balance. Beginning 01 Year

7,174

54,045

(7,949)

61.219

(28,484)

__~5~3,270

(24,786)

2~,786

Fund Balance, End ofYei!lr $ 61.219 ~S~~5",3,270 $ 24,786 $ $

NOTE: The Governmental Accounting Sti!lndi!lrds Board recently issued Sti!ltement No. 54, Which requires i!lny Special Revenue Fund that receives a substantial portion of its fin,mcial support from the Generi!ll Fund to be accounted for as if were Pi!lrt or Ihe Generi!ll Fund. The Senior Citizens ServiCes Department receives more than 50% of its 'inancii!ll resources from the General Fund and, thererore, meels lhe requirements of Slatemeni No, 54. Accordingly, beginning in 2012, il will

be budgeled for in the General Fund.

o . 19

------


DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES SENIOR SERVICES HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide oulreach ~ervices, legal counsel, and adult day services 10 the older popularton Qf Macomb County.

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013


Senior Cenler & Adminislration:

Managers & Supervisors 20 2,0 2,0

Professional Support 3,0 3,0 2,0

Clencal Staff 2,0 20 10

7,0 7,0 5,0

Legal Services: Managers & Supervisors 1.0 Professional Support 1,0 2,0 2,0 Clerical Staff 1,0 1.0 1,0

30 30 30

Outreach: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support 30 30 30 Clerical StElH

3,0 3,0 3,0

Counseling: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support 1,8 1,8 1,8 Clerical Staff

18 1,8 18

Prescription Resource: Managers & S\lpervisors Professional Support 10 1.0 1,0 Clerical Staff as 0,5 0,5

1.5 1,5 1,5

Adult Day Services I· Managers & Supervisors Professional Support 6,0 6,0 6,0 Clerical Siaft 1.0 1.0 1,0

70 70 7.0

D -20


DEPARTMENT

SENIOR CITIZENS SERVICES

FUND

SENIOR SERVICES

FUNCTION

HEALTH /I, WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

To prOVide outreach services, leg'll coun~el, and aduit day services \0 the older populaljon 01 Macomb County

POSITION TYPE

2009 A{;(ual

2010

Actual

2011

Amended

2012

Recommended

2013

Recommended

Adult Day Services II' Managers & Supervisors Prolessional Support Clerical Staff

5.0

50

50

5.0

50

50

Senior Cilizen Grants: Managers /1; Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Staff

30 1.0 4.0

3.0 1.0 4.0

Total Position Count 32,3 32.3 26.3

EXPENDITURES BY SERVICE Administration Adult Day Services I Adull Day Services II Counseling Discount Denial Elderly Abuse GRG Program Legal Services Outreach Prescription Resource NetworX Special Needs

Total

$ 703,883 216,445 133,248

71,593 15,732

968

260,375 158,975

65,668 22,973

, 1,649,860

5

$

543,040 215,037 108,414 109,176

5.841 221,745 163,239

69,814 29,313

1,465,619

$ 591.628 253,543 162,846 148,713

271,676 211,544

82,000 28.484

$ 1,750.434

$

$

I

,

D - 21



VETERANS SERVICES VETERANS AFFAIRS PUBLIC SAFETY

MISSION STATEMENT:

Through funding by a special .04 mil property lax levy approved by [he volers in November 2006 for a five year period, \0 provide

assistance 10 velerans and/or their dependents with filing claims for federal benefits with V.A.


Audited Budgeted

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Actual Actual Amended Recommended RecommendBd

Revenues: Property Taxes $ 1,274,443 $ 1,233,687 $ 1,100,870 , 1,045,827 , 1,024,910

Charges for Services 18,150 18,391 18,150 18,150

Total Revenues 1,292,593 1,252,058 1,100,870 1,063.977 1,043,060

Expenditures;

Personnel 372,026 452,193 642,107 698,264 723,318

Supplies & Services 156,392 195,077 311,257 247./07 201,736

Conferences & Training 5,416 8,OiO 10,000 10,000 10,000

Repairs & Maintenance 2,063 21.772 10,000 7.500 7,500

Internal Services 228,927 106,:322 92,506 92,506 92,506

Capilal Culla". 20,230 22,340 35,000 8,000 8,000

Total Expenditures 785.054 805,714 1.100,870 1 ,063.977 1,043.060

Reve-nues Over (Unde-r) Ellpe-ndilures 507,539 446,344

Nellncrease (Decrease) in Fund Balance 507.539 446,344

Fund Balance. Beginning of Year 507,539 953,883 953.883 953,883

Fund Balance, End ofYe-ar , 507,539 , 953,883 , 953,883 , 953.883 , 953,883

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

POSITION TYPE Actual Aclual Amended Recommended Recommended

Managers & Supervisors , .0 1.0 10 10 1 0

Professional Support 5.0 6.0 60 60 7.0

Clerical Staff 3.0 3,0 3.0 30 3.0


0-22



MARTHA T BERRY MCF MARTHA T. BERRY MCF FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Martha T. Berry Medical Care Facility provides proessiorral services in the care and rehabilitation of the cronically ill and/Qr

,~andicapped. These services include medical, dlelary, inhalation therapy, physical and occupatlonallherapy.

Revlmues: Charges for Services

Reimbursements

Other Revenue

Year Ended December_31,

Audited Budgeted


$ 20.623,228 $22,696.259 $ 21,774,441 $ 22,242,371

385 51,947

33,188 12,613 12,000 60,780

2013 Recommended

$ 23,196,498

60,780

Total Revenues 20,856,801 22,761,019 2U86,441 22,303,151 23,257,278

EKpenditures:

Personnel

Supplies 8. Services


Utilities

Repairs 8. Maintenance

Vehicle Operations

Contract Services

Internal Services

Capilal Oullay

12,626,735

3,901,765

100

719,944

35.321

479

2,853,473

1,477,064

35,467

12,691,652

3.947,816

1,144

619,875

23,746

60B

3,728,426

1,002,786

125,181

13,958,236

4,076,727

250

709,000

37,900

1,250

2,868,500

1,032,578

150,000

13.529,519

4,589.582

1,500

649,000

19,900

1,250

2,417,000

967,400

128,000

14,483.646

4,589,582

1,500

649,000

19,900

1,250

2,417,000

967,400

128.000


Rellenues Oller (Under) Expenditures (793,547) 619.785 (1,048,000)


Transfers in - General Fund 896,979 1,000,000

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses}: 896,979 1.000,000

Net Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance


103,432

1.349,374

619,785

1,452.806

(411.000)

2,072.591 2,024,591 2,024,591

Fund Balance, End of Year I 1,452,806 I 2,072,591 I 2,024,591 I 2,024,591 I 2.024,591

E 1


OEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION

MARTHA T. BERRY MCF MARTHA T. BERRY MCF FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Martha T. Berry Medical Care Facility provides proessional services In the care and rehabilitation of the cronically iii and/or

handicapped. These services include medical, dietary, inhalation therapy, physical and occupational therapy.

POSITION TYPE

Admlnistra\or:

Managers"" Supervisors Professional Support

Clerical Staff

Accounting Office Managers .... Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Staff

Laundry Supervisor

Managers"" Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Staff

Laundry Personnel: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Staff

Social Work Services: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Staff

Dietary Personnel: Managers & Supervisors ProfeSSional Support Clerical Staff

Direclor of Nursing: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Slaff

2009

Actual

1.0

1.0

3.0 20 7.5

12.5

1 0

1.0

3.0

3.0

1.0 20 20 5.0

1.0 16.5

175

30

2010

Actual

1.0

1.0

30 2.0 75

125

1.0

1.0

3.0

30

1 0 2.0 2.0 5.0

1.0 16.5

175

3.0

2011

Amended

1 0

1.0

40 30 75

14,5

1.0

1.0

3.0

3.0

1.0 2.0 2.0 5.0

1.0 16.5

17.5

3.0

2012 2013

Recommended Recommended

1.0 1,0

1.0 1 0

4.0 4.0 2.0 20 6.0 6.0

12.0 12,0

1.0 1.0

1.0 1.0

3.5 3.5

35 3.5

'.0 2.0 2.0" 1.0 1.0 40 40

1 0 10 160 16.0

17.0 17,0

3.0 30

3.0 3.0 3.0 30 30



MARTHA T. BERRY MCF MARTHA T. BERRY MCF FUND HEALTH & WELFARE

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Martha T. Berry Medical Care Facility provides proessional services in lhe care and rehabilitation of the cronicalJy ill and/or

handicapped. These services include medical, dietary, inhalalion therapy physical and occupational therapy.

POSIT/{)N TYPE

Registered Nurses: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Staff

LP Nurses: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support Clerir-al Slaff

Nurses Aides' Managers & Supervisors Professional Support Clerical Slaff

Nurse Adminislralion-CieriC<lI' Managers & SL,pervisors Professional Support CleriC<lI Staff

Nurse Environmental Services: Managers & Supervisors Professional Support CleriC<lI Staff

Diversional Therapy Managers & Supervisors Professior>31 Support CleriC<lI Staff

To(al POSition Count

2009 Aclual

60 24.0

300

18,0

18.0

111.5

111.5

20 2.0

20.0

20,0

1 0 5.0

60

230,5

2010

Actual

60 240

30,0

18.0

18.0

112,0

1120

20 20

200

200

1.0 5.0

60

231.0

2011

Amended

60 24.0

30.0

18,0

18.0

112.0

112.0

___-'20 20

20.0

20.0

1 0 50

60

2330

2012 2013 Recommended Recommended

60 60 240 24.0

300 30.0

18,0 180

18.0 180

1120 112.0

1120 112,0

20 20 2.0 20

220 220

22,0 22.0

1.0 10 5.0 50

60 60

231.5 231.5

E-3


OEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION

PARKS & REG PARKS FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide a day-use park for general public use.


Audited Budgeted


Revenues:

Charges for Services $ 126,750 $ 126,500 $ 125,000 $ $

Other Revenue 46,044 57,600 40,000

Total Revellues 172,804 184,100 165,000

Expenditures:

Personnel 88,721 8,264


Utilities 103,149 57,243 155,007 155,001 155,007

Internal Services 500 500 500

Tolal E)(penditures 636,622 313,043 322,507 322.507 322,507

Revenues Over (Under) ExpendihHes (4<33,818) (128,943) (157,507) (322,507) (322,507)


Transfers in - General Fund 403,804 70,727 97,507 262,507 262,507

Total Other Financing Sources (Uses): 403,804 70,727 97,507 262,507 262,507

Nellncrease (Decrease) in Fund Balance (60,014) (58,216) (60,000) (60,000) (60,000)

FUnd Balance, Beginning 01 Year 974,852 914,838 856,622 796,622 736,622

Fund Balance, End of Year $ 914,838 $ 856,622 $ 796,622 $ 736,622 $ 676,622

E· ,

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Debt Service Fund Detail by Cillegory


FINANCE DEBT SERVICE GENERAL GOVERNMENT


Audited BUdgeted 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Actual Aclual Amended Recommende Recommende

Revenues:

Property Ta~es S 175,805 $ 155,341 $ 133,672 $ 126,988 $ 124,448

In~estmerlt tncome __'_93032 178,254 28,779 73,270 145,020

Total Re~enues 368.837 333,595 162,451 200.258 269,468

Ell.penditures:

Repairs & Mainlenance 118,545 96,061 133,672 126,986 124.448

Debt Service - Principal 4,585,000 5,165.000 5,620,000 5,870,000 5,910,000

Debl Service - Interest and fees 2,882,867 2,706,312 2,511,408 2,297,778 2,067,240

Total EJlpenditures 7.586,412 7,967,373 8,265,080 8,294,766 8,101.688

Re~enues O~er (Under) EJlpendilures (1.217,575) (7,633,778) (8,102.629) (8,094,508) (7,832,220)

Other Financing Sources fUses):

Transfers in - Genera! Fund 6,947.378 6.937,240

Transfers in - Other Funds 7,027,042 6,844,937 6,847,696

Tolal Other Financing Sources (Uses): 7,027,042 6,844,937 8,847,696 6,947,378 6,937.240

Increase (Decrease) in Fund Balance (190.533) (788,841) (1,254,9331 (1,147,130) (894,980)

Fund Balance, Be9inning of Year 7,227,719 7,037,186 6.248,345 4,993,412 3.846,282

Fund Balance, End trlYear $7,037,186 $ 6,248)45 $4,993,412 $ 3,848,282 $ 2,951,302

F 1

MACOMB COUNTY, MICHIGAN Debt Service Fund - Debt Service Paymnets by Issue

DEPARTMENT FUND FUNCTION FINANCE DEBT SERVICE FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT

Au~;t"d 6ud90'ed

Orlyi.ol Issue

Out!tanding ~Jl12010

"'earol Final

Matun!Y .".0,<1"" "'"Actual 7011

Amended ""Rocommended JDB

Recommonded

."c,,",,' County Building AUlho"ly

S.,i.. ,~ •• V....uU.n Buildmg Renov.lion

Pone,p" 1.205,000 lOO~ 145,000

Interest & Fee' 3.r,~1

S.,;".1000-8 Clon,"n, 0;.....'

Pnne'p.1 ',000,000 ::'009 175.000

In'.re.' & Fee' 5~1.9~~

Series 1002-.0, Admm Bu/ld;"9 Refunding

P"ncipal >.Oll'.O'Jlj 4 185.(}oO "0" '05,000 740.000 765.000 Buu O~Q 8J5,000

In'""" & F""" '8~ 475 1oo,B75 "'7"" I 14 ,'l1 85,552

S"" .. 1U()2I1lTEilYoulh Home

PO"O'••' J2,OOO,OOO G,OoO,OOO ,,0 " , 3OC,OOO 1,]50,000 1."").(o(J~ I 475.000 1.S5DOOO

''''"'''' & Fees .n7,10G ,83.394 ~::7 HJ~ l;;HOO '04 ll<;

$ ..... 2004 IIJe W«tt W~_ou••

Pnnc'paF ~,'OO,OOO , 9~.OQO '102~ ;'"'·.DDQ 2(1('.');)0 '.600Q 220,000 2'~.Qr,{)

'''WO''~''"' I~;.n.' '~5.J13 17£.587 lGI ,5~7 "."75

Series 2004-A Pv~"< Wo,o;, Bu;Jd;~~

Pnne<pal ,,;'~ ro~ 3,215.,);-\" ,0,4 11,,~\1 175.000 175000 ~~) "'JU ,no,ooo

Intore" & F..., "o-'~ 133,875 1,7.1)87 ';' '. 137 ln~37

Series .005 C""""n. '1.'unding

P""c'pal H7~.OOC I.MO,OOO <"~O ~o.ooo ,n~wo <30.l'O'· ;"S 000 150,00'.1

Inler~' & F""" ~~.808 107."0 ~Y.5'2 g" '53 8:1,24k

Serjes 2005 BOO Mkl !'I.dlolNB Di",j<'f COO"

P""c'pal 19,:I80.00l 1~,C80,Oorl 2-~~'i lSO,OOO 77S.(j(j~ "00,000 :;'5.0'N OC,O.OOO

'"'eee" & F*. 7 13,219 U,lill~' 061.031 6,')1.001 o1M')1

S'''e. 2007 M7Ei1Yovl~ Nomo Rotundi"'}

PO""N'

Im~r"" & f"". 16M~/Nl- " .. 'NOOe 202, ,~ ODO

[,"~,,<.

;;O.UOO

666.6, I

6' 000

GM ',,,,,

65',tol' .621501

TO.OOU

659,791

Cnmin.1 J",UOO Build'09 Authority

S .. i•• 1OOH' R<'undjn~

n,oe,"", 5.800.000 3.29(!.u,-," .'01.' 270.000 805,000 11~~'Y{' 135.noo 1,WQ.ooD

Interest ~ Feo' nO.B25 1"1.37~ 1:".?3! 8.0,025 <'J.n',

Mlohigan Transportallb" flonds

Sorie' 200{}.A Brldg. B~nd.

Pnncrpal ~"''lro.Doo 'Gog :>00,000

In'ereg, 8. Fees 10.550

Se"e. :l004-B B.ld~. 80M.

Pnn,',., lu.000WI) 5.205.00U 2021 '~1fJO'J ·\00.000 400.000 :;OU.C,UU SOO.OOO

,,,''',,',,' & Fe'" 1J~ 400 )14,%0 ~'D4DD 1'6.900 171,775

S ..,~s "'G. RefuM'"g Bortds

FMc,pal 2.605.000 2,1,,0.000 201 ; 1<1.000 J~~,OOO ,(j, ~'l'J '20.000 4.'Q.oDD

'"'"0''' ~ Fees ",,762 8",G2,~ __121~--'- W.600 '~.9~

llM25.000 , ;;'l.OM",,) $ 7,'67,"';7 ~7.8n31? $ 3 131.<llO ; ~ 16!,nB ?97U4Q

Pn"pc.' S 4.50j u()(, ," 'oSQOO S ~,6:'0,ooo ~",0.r"J~ 5,910,000

'"'~I~'~" '.882.B67 2,J\l';.112 2.511,_08 ___' :-Jr n~ 2,n672~0

~ 7-"V,8G7 1 7.~71.3';' • ~ 131.% e 1£7 TiB 7,977.240

F - 2

RECYCLABLE PAPER

9 RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:

AGENDA ITEM:,

_

_


RESOLUTION TO

INTRODUCED BY:

review draft Purchasing Ordinance dated October 12, 2011

Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee

COMMITIEE/MEETING DATE Finance 10-18-11

PURCHASING ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1. POLICIES AND DEFINTIONS 2

SECTION 2. PURCHASING MANAGER ..... . 5

SECTION 3. REQUISITION PROCESS . . 6

SECTION 4. COMPFTITIVE BIDDING AND PROPOSALS 6

SECTION s. PURCHASES EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE BIDDING; EMERGENCIES 11

SECTION 6. SMALL PURCHASES 12

SECTION 7. PROFESSIONAL SERViCES . . 13

SECTION 8. COOPERATIVE PURCHASiNG . . 14

SECTION 9. CONTRACT CHANGES.... . 14

SECTION 10. ETHICS POLiCy . ....................... 15

PURCHASING ORDINANCE (Draft October 12, 2011]

SECTION 1. POLICY AND DEFINITIONS

Sec. 1.1. Policies and Procedures

It shall be the policy of Macomb County to enter into contracts for goods, services, construction and professional services at fair and reasonable compensation for the work performed. Procedures shall be developed to manage the procurement process in accordance with the law; spend the taxpayers' money wisely and fairly; protect against fraud and favoritism; encourage participation by Macomb County businesses; promote equality of opportunity for all businesses; and best meet the needs of Macomb County departments through continuous improvement of purchasing systems

Sec. 2.2. Applicability

This Ordinance applies to contracts for the procurement of goods, services, construction and professional services entered into by Macomb County. It shall apply to every expenditure of public funds by a Macomb County department for public purchasing irrespective of its source, except as otherwise provided by State law, State regulation, Macomb County Ordinance or

administrative policy. When the procurement involves the expenditure of State or Federal assistance or contract funds, the procurement shall be conducted in accordance with any

applicable mandatory State and/or Federal law. Nothing in this Ordinance shall prevent any County department from complying with the terms and conditions of any grant, gift, bequest, or cooperative purchasing agreement that is otherwise consistent with law.

Sec. 3.3. Definitions

A. Bid - An advertised, open, competitive solicitation for prices that are opened publicly.

B. Business - Any corporation, partnership, individual, sale proprietorship, joint stock company, joint venture, or any other private legal entity.

C. Change Order - A signed written order directing the contractor to make changes according to the "Changes" clause of the contract authorizes the Purchasing Manager to order without the consent of the contractor.

D. Confidentiallnformation_- Any information which is available to an employee only because of the employee's status as an employee of the County and is not a matter of

public knowledge or available to the public via request pursuant to the Freedom of

Information Act.

2

E. Construction - The process of building, altering, renovating or demolishing any public structure or building, not including the routine operation, routine repair, or routine maintenance of existing structures, buildings, or real property.

F. Contract - All types of County agreements, regardless of what they may be called, for the

procurement of good, services, construction or professional services.

G. Contract Modification -Any written alteration in specifications, delivery point, rate of delivery, period of performance, price, quantity, or other provisions of any contract accomplished by mutual action of the parties to the contract.

H. Contractor - Any person and/or their agent having a contract wilh the County.

I. Cooperative Purchasing - Procurement conducted by or an behalf of more than one

public procurement unit.

J. County-based Enterprise - A business is deemed to be a county-based enterprise (CBE) if it satisfies all of the following criteria:

1. Its headquarters is physically located within Macomb County, or it has been conducting business at a location with a permanent street address in the county on an ongoing basis for not less than one taxable year prior to its response to an invitation for bids.

2. It has made payment of property taxes an real or personal property within the past

year on property which is ordinarily needed to perform the proposed contract. 3. At least 50 percent of ils regular full-time employees are based at the county location

to perform the proposed contract.

4. It has been dealing for at least one year on a regular commercial basis in the kind of goods or service which is the subject of the bid or in a closely or logically allied product line.

K. County Employee - An individual, including an ejected or appointed official, drawing a salary or wages from the County.

L Department - Any County department, office, board, commission, or other unit of county government requiring goods, services, construction or professional services procured pursuant to this Ordinance.

M. Direct or Indirect Participalion -Involvement through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, preparation or any part of a purchase request, influencing the content of any specification or procurement standard, rendering of advice, investigation, auditing,

or in any other advisory capacity.

3

N. Finance Committee - The Committee established by the Board of Commissioners to review and recommend appropriation bUdgets and expenditures of fund for all using agencies.

O. Financial Interest

1. Ownership of any interest or involvement in any relationship from which, or as a

result of which, a person within the past year has received, or is presently or in the future entitled to receive, more than $1000.00 per year, or its equivalent;

2. Ownership of S% (five percent) of any property or business; or 3. Holding a position in a business such as officer, director, trustee, partner, employee,

or the like, or holding any position of management.

P. Gratuity - A payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, service, or anything of more than nominal value, present or promised, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater value is received.

Q. Immediate Family - A spouse, child, stepchild, parent, parent-in-law, brother, Sister, son

in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law.

R. Invitation for Bids - All documents (whether attached or incorporated by reference) utilized for soliciting sealed bids.

S. Procurement - The buying, purchasing, renting, leasing, or acquiring of any supplies, or

services. It also includes all functions that pertain to the obtaining of any supply, service or construction, including descriptIon of requirements, selection, and solicitation of sources, preparation and award of contract, and all phases of contract administration.

T. Professional Services - Services which require a high degree of intellectual skill whereby the County's best interests are serviced by a unique combination of specialized

k.nowledge, experience and expertise.

U. Public Agency - A public entity subject to or created by the County.

V. Public Servant - An employee, county-wide elected official, commissioner, or appointee of the County.

W. Purchasing Manager - Macomb County's principal purchasing official. The Purchasing Manager shall service as the central procurement officer of the County. The duties for

the Purchasing Manager shall be exercised under the control, supervision, direction, and authority of the County Finance Director. With the approval of the Finance Director, the

Purchasing Manager may delegate authority to purchase, if necessary, for the effective procurement of specific items.

4

x. Relative - persons related to the individual as father, mother, son, daughter, anyone over

the age of 21 who resides with that person, brother, sisler, uncle, aunt, great aunt, great uncle, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, grandfather, grandmother, grandson,

granddaughter, falher-in-Iaw, mother-ill-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law,

sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, and including the father, mother, grandfather, or grandmother of an individual's spouse and the individual's fiance or fiancee.

Y. Request For Proposals (RFP) - All documents (whether attached or incorporated by

reference) utilized for soliciting proposals.

z. Responsible Bidder -A person who has the capability in all respects to perform fully the

contract requirements, which will assure good faith performance.

AA. Respomive Bidder - A person who has submitted a bid which conforms in all material respects to the requirements set forth in the invitation for bids.

BB. Services - The furnishing of time, labor, or effort by a contractor, not involving the delivery of a specific end product other than reports which are incidental to the required performance.

SECTION 2. PURCHASING MANAGER

Sec. 2.2. Authority and Duties

A. Principal Purchasing Official. The Purchasing Manager shalt serve as the principal public purchasing official for the County and shall be responsible for the procurement of goods, services, construction and professional services in accordance with this Ordinance, as well as

the management and disposal of surplus property.

B. Duties. In accordance with this Ordinance, and subject to the supervision of the County Executive, the Finance Department Director, and the Finance Committee, the Purchasing Manager shalt:

1. Supervise the procurement of supplies and services needed by the County 2, Sell, trade, transfer, or otherwise dispose of surplus County property; 3. Establish and maintain programs for specifications development, contract

administration, inspection and acceptance, in cooperation with the agencies using the goods, serVices, construction and professional services;

4. Exercise general supervision over inventories of goods belonging to the County;

5. ESlablish procedures for contract management including the monitoring of

compliance and payments.

j

C. Purchasing Regulations and Operational Procedures. Consistent with this Ordinance, and

with the appro....al of the County Executi....e and Finance Committee, the Purchasing Manager may adopt operational procedures relating to the execution of his/her duties.

D. Allocation of the Proceeds from Sale of Disposal of Surplus Goods. The Purchasing Manager shall allocate net proceeds from the sale, lease, or disposal of surplus goods back to

the appropriate fund.

E. Purchasing Determinations. The Purchasing Manager shall work cooperati....ely with departments in making determinations relati ....e to the purchase of goods, ser.... ices, construction and professional ser.... ices.

SECTION 3 - REQUISITION PROCESS

The purchasing process is instituted in all cases by the requesting department. Each department of the County shall supply the Purchasing Manager with a requisition through the

computerized system. The Purchase Requisition includes such data as specifications. recommended ....endor, and other details including budget and account information, and must be appro....ed by the department head or authorized departmental representati ....e through the

on-line appro....al method. The requisition is sent electronically to the Purchasing Manager. The Purchasing Manager then distributes the work by commodity code responsibility to the appropriate buyer.

SECTION 4 - COMPETITIVE BIDDING AND PROPOSALS

Sec. 4.1. General

An openly publicized competiti ....e process for the procurement of goods, ser.... ices, construction and professional ser.... ices is the most effecti ....e means of determining the lowest cost from a responsible source and shall be utilized whene....er possible. Purchases of goods, ser.... ices and construction in excess of $ 20,000 or where multiple purchases within a year are likely to exceed $20,000 shall be subject to competiti ....e sealed bidding. For Professional Services Contracts refer to Section S.

A. Source Selection and Contract Formation~ All County contracts shall be awarded on a competiti ....e bid basis or proposal basis. The ....arious categories of competiti ....e bids are listed

below:

• Informal Bids

• Sealed Bids

• Multi-Step Sealed Bids

• Small Purchases

6

• Request for Proposal

• Sale Source Procurement

• Cooperative Purchasing

• Emergency Procurement

The conditions for the use of each bid process will be determined by the Purchasing Manager

and the dollar expenditure limits as adopted by the Macomb County Board of Commissioners.

B. Methods Utilized by Macomb County. The County shall utilize the following methods for the procurement of services and supplies.

1. Informal Bids. Informal bids are used for expenditures of $5,000 to $20,000. Competitive quotes are secured through formal quotations generated within the Purchasing Division. Three bids or more are typically requested. These bids contain standard

terminology and specify a date by which they must be returned.

2. Sealed Bids. Sealed bids are used for expenditures of $20,000 and above. These bids contain standard terminology and performance specifications as well as date and time due.

All bids must be received by the due date and time specified in order to be considered. Receipt of sealed bids by facsimile is not allowed by Macomb County.

3. Multi-Step Sealed Bids. When it is considered impractical to initially prepare a purchase description to support an award based on price, an "Invitation for Bids" may be issued requesting the submission of unpriced offers to be followed by an invitation fOr bid limited to those bidders whose offers have determined to be technically acceptable under the criteria set forth in the first solicitation.

4. Request for Proposal. This type of bid is normally used to secure outside services or a combination of services and/or products. A request for proposal normally describes a problem or specific need. This procurement method is more flexible and accommodates vendors Wishing to submit a custom proposal where ingenuity or creative solutions can be submitted to solve a problem in a more cost-effective manner.

5. Sole Source Procurement. A contract may be awarded without competition upon the written recommendation of the Purchasing Manager and the approval of the Finance Director and Chair of the Board of Commissioners if, after conducting a good faith review of available sources, it is determined that there is only one source for the required supply or service item. Under this method, pricing must be established under government contract or negotiated. With this type of purchase more documentation is required and must be

filed with each purchase order including the specific reasons for the designation as a sale source item and how the pricing was determined.

6. Cooperative Purchasing. This method of purchasing may be used in cooperation with

political subdivisions to procure items off cooperatively bid state, local and Federal

7

contracts. Under this method the bid limits follow those outlined above for formal and

sealed bid procurements. Cooperative contracts can also be issued as joint efforts between political subdivisions and Macomb County. This method should incorporate each individual political subdivision's procurement policies and procedures.

7. Emergency Purchases. The Purchasing Manager may make or authorize others to make emergency procurements of supplies or services when there exists a threat to public health, welfare or safety, In each instance as much competition as is practical under the

circumstances shall be factored into the decision of award. Written documentation specifying the nature-of the emergency must be included in the contract file and approved by the Finance Director on a retrospective basis.

C. Made in Macomb County, Michigan, and/or USA. When the County makes a purchase, preference shall be given to products manufactured or services based first in Macomb County, then in Michigan and then in the United States when they are available at comparable prices and are of equal, superior, or similar quality.

Sec. 4,2 Procedures for Competitive Bidding

A. Vendors Bid and Qualification listings,:. All vendors interested in providing goods or services to the County must register their business on the Purchasing System Website

currently in use by the County. Vendors may access the Purchasing System Website through the County's website, All current bidding documents shall be posted at the Purchasing System Website. Vendors shall comply with the personal disclosure requirements as set forth in the Macomb County Ethics Ordinance.

B. Invitation for Bids. An invitation for bids shall be issued and shall include specifications and all contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement.

C. Public Notice. Adequate public notice of the invitation for bids shall be given a reasonable

time, not less than twelve (12) calendar days prior to the date of the opening of bids. Such notice shall be posted to the MITN website. The public notice shall state the place, date, and time of bid opening.

D. Standard Clauses and Their Modification, The Purchasing Manager, after consultation with Corporation Counsel and Risk Management, may establish standard contract clauses for use in County contracts. These clauses may include equal protection and non-discrimination compliance, labor harmony and living wage provisions.

E. Bid and Performance Bonds on Goods or Service Contracts. Bid and performance bonds or other security may be requested for supply contracts as the Purchasing Manager deems

necessary to protect the County's interests. Any such bonding requirements shall be set forth in the solicitation. Bid or performance bonds shall not be used as a substitute for a determination of a bidder's responsibility. The limits for bonds are 5% covered either by a S% bid bond or

8

certified check for 5% of the contract and 100% for a performance bond. Bid bonds wilt be

held by the Purchasing Manager until an award decision is made. Upon final award, all other bid deposits shall be returned. If a vendor fails to submit a bid bond with their bid, the bid will be rejected.

When a construction contract is awarded in excess of $20,000, the following bonds or security

shall be delivered to the County and shall become binding on the parties upon the execution of the contract:

(a) a performance bond satisfactory to the County, executed by a surety company

authorized to do business in the State, or otherwise security in a manner satisfactory to the County, in an amount equal to one-hundred percent (100%) of the price specified in the contract; and

(b) a payment bond satisfactory to the County, executed by a surety company authorized to do business in the State or otherwise secured in a manner satisfactory to the County, for the protection of all persons supplying labor or material to the contractor or its

subcontractors for the performance of the work provided for in the contract. The bond shall be in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the price specified in the contract.

F. Insurance Requirements on Goods or Service Contracts. The Purchasing Manager shall

determine, in consultation with the Risk Manager, whether insurance coverage by the contractor shall be required, and, if so, the types and amounts of coverage that shall be required. The contractor shall have the County named as an additional insured as its interest

may appear and furnish the Purchasing Manager with satisfactory evidence of the insurance.

G. Cancellation or Rejection of Invitations for Bids or Requests. An invitation for bids, a request for proposals, or other solicitation may be canceled, or any or all bids or proposals may be rejected in whole or in part as may be specified in the solicitation, when it is for good cause and in the best interests of the County. Each solicitation issued by the County shall state that

the solicitation may be canceled by the Purchasing Manager and that any bid or proposal may be rejected in whole or in part for good cause when in the best interests of the County. The reasons shall be made part of the contract file and Shall be provided upon request to unsuccessful bidders.

H. Sealed Bids Opening. All sealed bids shall be opened publicly by a Purchasing Division representative in the presence of one or more witnesses at the time and place designated in the bid invitation. Information as deemed appropriate will be read by the Purchasing Division

representative including the name of each bidder, the amount of each bid and relevant information pertinent to the award. Bids shall be unconditionally accepted without alteration or correction.

I. Addendums to Sealed Bids. After solicitation has been made to vendors it may become necessary in certain instances to issue addendums amending the specificat"lons, or extending

9

J. Correction or Withdrawal of Bids. The correction or withdrawal of a bid may be done by

the vendor prior to the bid opening. This correction or withdrawal because of a mistake can be either in written form, delivered via the U.S. Postal Service or other carrier, or can be faxed or emailed to the Purchasing Department prior to the bid deadline. After the bid opening no changes in the bid prices or provisions shall be permitted. In lieu of correcting the bid, a bidder

alleging a material mistake is permitted to withdraw his bid if the mistake is clearly evident or the bidder submits evidence that clearly demonstrates that a mistake was made. All decisions

to permit the correction or withdrawal of bids are to be supported by a written determination to be made by the Purchasing Manager and approved by the Finance Director.

K. Bid Evaluation. Bids shall be evaluated based on the requirements set forth in the invitation for bid, which may include criteria to determine acceptability such as inspection, testing of quality, workmanship, delivery and sUitability for a particular purpose. The "Invitation for Bids" shall establish the evaluation criteria to be used which may include such factors as discounts, transportation costs, total life cycle costs, and/or value analysis. Criteria that is not requested in the bid or intentionally left out may not be used in the award evaluation. The responsibility

and responsiveness of the bidder will also be a factor. A responsible bidder is a bidder whose reputation, past performance, and financial capabilities are such that the bidder would be judged by the appropriate authority to be capable of satisfying the County's needs for a specific

contract. A responsive bidder is a bidder whose bid does not vary from the specifications and the terms set in the proposal.

L. Determination of Non-responsibility of Bidder. Failure to perform, or unsatisfactory performance, on one or more County contracts within a 2 year period shall be cause for the Purchasing Manager to determine non-responsibility. The unreasonable failure of a bidder to promptly supply information or samples in connection with an inquiry with respect to responsibility, Or unacceptable performance on prior contracts, may be grounds for a determination of non· responsibility with respect to such bidder. If a bidder who otherwise would have been awarded a contract is found non-responsible, a written determination of non

responsibility, setting forth the basis of the finding, shall be prepared by the Purchasing Manager. A copy of the determination shall be sent promptly to the non-responsible bidder.

M. County-Based Enterprise. An equalization percentage credit from the equalization

allowance table will be applied to the bid of any county-based enterprise. This credit will be subtracted from the bid ofthe county·based enterprise. In comparing bids, the bid ofthe

10

county-based enterprise after subtraction of the credit shall be considered the official bid.

However, if the county-based enterprise is awarded the contract, the bid without the equalization percentage credit shall be the contract price.

Contract Amount Equalization Percentage

Up to $50,000.00 5 $50,001.00 to $200,000.00 3 $200,001.00 and over 1

1. No business shall receive these credits unless they have been certified by the Purchasing Manager.

2. Any business who claims entitlement to any equalizatfon credit shall agree to make the

records necessary to establish eligibility to the County.

3. After apply any equalization credits as provided above, the contract shall be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder thus evaluated.

N. Award. The contract shall be awarded by appropriate written notice to the lowest

responsive and responsible bidder whose bid best meets the requirements and criteria set forth in the invitation for bids, if the bid is within the amount of funds appropriated.

The Standing Committee in charge of the department and the Finance Committee shall submit their recommendation on the award of a contract by resolution to the County Board for its consideration at its next meeting.

O. Public Right-to-Know. Not less than once each calendar month, the Office of County Executive shall deliver to the Commission a list of all contracts of goods and services signed or

entered into during the previous thirty (30) days, with sufficient detail as required by the Commission for verification of the line item authorization and to provide feasible, accessible, and economical public access to that expenditure information. This information shall be made available to the public on the county's website for the duration of said contracts.

SECTION 5 - PURCHASES EXEMPT FROM COMPETITIVE SEALED PROPOSALS; EMERGENCiES AND SMAll PURCHASES

Sec. 5.1. Purchases Exempt from Competitive Sealed Proposals

When a department head conducts a good faith review of available sources and determines

that the contract by its very nature is not suitable to competitive bids or proposals, the

department head shall forward an Exempt request to the Purchasing Manager. The Purchasing Manager will review and approve all Exempt requests and give retrospective notice to the Chair of the Board ot Commissioners. The Purchasing Manager may consult with ad hoc groups of

II

county staff in making the determination with regard to a particular procurement. If the Purchasing Manager reviews and approves the department head's recommendation that the

procurement is exempt from competitive bids or proposals, the department is not required to employ the competitive proposal or bidding process to enter into a contract. Examples of

contracts which may not be suitable for competitive bids or proposals are:

1. There is only one source for the required goods, service, or construction item. 2. There exists a long standing, successful relationship for professional services, and the knowledge gained through this relationship adds value integral to the services provided. 3. A sole supplier's item is needed for trial use or testing. 4. Purchases of used equipment.

5. Purchases at auctions.

Sec. S.2 Emergency Procurement

A threat to public health, welfare, or safety, or to prevent or minimize serious disruption of government services. shall be considered an "emergency." Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Ordinance, the Purchasing Manager may make or authorize others to make emergency procurement of goods, services, or construction items. Emergency procurements shall be made with such competition as is practicable under the circumstances. A written determination of the basis for the emergency and for the selection of the particular contractor

shall be certified by the using department head or other department head as may be appropriate, shall be forwarded to the Purchasing Manager, and included in the contract file. A confirming Resolution, along with the written determination, shaH be submitted to the County

Board for all emergency procurements of $20,000 Or more.

SECTION 6. SMAll PURCHASES

Sec. 6.1 Small Purchase Procurement

For non-contract purchases, competitive quotations for purchases up to $5,000 are encouraged by the Department Head or their designee to determine the source that is in the County's best interests. The Purchasing Manager shall document quotations from at least three vendors whenever feasible.

Sec. 6.2. Small Purchase Procedures

A. Solicitation Factors. Three quotations shall be received whenever possible prior to the contract. Circumstances may exist where the Purchasing Manager determines that it is not

feaSible to secure three quotations. In other situations, the Purchasing Manager may determine that it is in the best interests of the County to consider only one supplier who has previous

experlise relative to a procurement. Whenever the Purchasing Manager determines that it is not feasible. or is not in the County's best interests to satisfy the minimum quotation

12

B. Evaluation Factors._Evaluation factors which may justify an award to a vendor who has not provided the lowest quotation include, but are not limited to, delivery requirements, quantity requirements, quality. and past vendor performance. Whenever the Purchasing Agent or the agents' designee determines that it is in the County's best interests to award a small purchase contract to a vendor who did not submit the lowest quote, the reason for this determination shall be indicated in writing and retained in the contract file. A copy shall also be forwarded to the Chair of the Board of Commissioners.

SECTION 7- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Sec. 7.1. General

When procuring professional services, the user department requiring such services may procure them through the Purchasing Department in accordance with the selection procedure specified in this section.

Sec. 7.2 Statement of Qualifications

Persons engaged in providing professional services shall slJbmit a statement of qualifications and expressions of interest in providing such professional services. The using agency procuring such professional services may specify a uniform format for the statement of qualifications.

Sec. 7.3 Request for Proposals

Requests for proposals shall be sent to qualified people showing an interest in providing the services required and they shall describe the services requested, list the types of information and data required of each bidder and state the relative importance of particular qualifications. The award criteria should be documented by the head of the using department procuring the required professional services or the Purchasing Manager. The evaluation and selections process shall be conducted by a committee composed of the using department director, Finance Director, Chair of the Board of Commissioners, Corporation Counsel, or their designees. Should either Corporation Counselor the Finance Department be the using department, the Risk Manager shall be added to the evaluation and selection committee.

13

SECTION 8 - COOPERATIVE PURCHASING

Sec. 8.1. Cooperative Purchasing Authorized

Subject to applicable state law, Macomb County may participate in, sponsor, conduct, or administer a cooperative purchasing agreement for the procurement of goods, services, construction, or professional services with one or more public procurement units in accordance

with an agreement entered into between the participants. Such cooperative purchasing may include, but is not limited to, joint or multi-party contracts between public procurement units

and open-ended state public procurement unit contracts, which are made available to other public procurement units.

Sec. 8.2. Sale, Acquisition, or Use of Goods

Macomb County may sell to, acquire from, or use any goods belonging to another public procurement unit independent ofthe requirements stated herein.

Sec. 8.3. Cooperative Use of Goods and Services

Macomb County may enter into an agreement independent of the requirements stated in this ordinance with any other public procurement unit for the cooperative use of goods or services under the terms agreed upon between the parties.

Sec. 8.4. Joint Use of Facilities

Macomb County may enter into agreements for the common use or lease of warehousing facilities, capital equipment, and other facilities with another public procurement unit under the terms agreed upon between the parties.

SECTION 9 - CONTRACT CHANGES

Sec. 9.1. Change Orders and Contract Modifications

When the total of change orders, contract modifications or price adjustments on any contract approved by Resolution of the County Board exceeds ten percent (10%) of the original contract amount, approval of the Standing Committee in charge of the using department and the Finance Committee is required.

The Purchasing Manager is authorized to sign all change orders. Additionally, the Director of the Department of Roads_is authorized to sign change orders for projects relating to planning, design, construction and maintenance of highways, bridges, and culverts. The Public Works Commissioner is authorized to sign change orders relating to planning, design, construction and maintenance of water and sewer projects. The Facilities & Operations Director is authorized to

14

sign change orders relating to planning and design and such other projects the Director is assigned by the County Executive to administer.

SECTiON 10 - ETHICS POLICY

Sec. 10.1. Statement of Ethical Policy

Public employment is a public trust. Proper conduct by Macomb County officers and employees inspires confidence in the wOrk of Macomb County. County officers and employees involved

direclly or indirectly in Macomb County's various procurement activities have a responsibility to perform their duties in a manner that will insure the integrity of Macomb County's purchasing transactions.

Sec. 10.2 General Ethical Standards

A. It shall be unethical for individuals and organizations to use their positions to manipulate Macomb County's Purchasing Ordinance, policies and procedures for personal gain or profit.

B. It shall be unethical for an individual to attempt to influence any involved individual or organization to violate the ethical standards for Macomb County Purchasing activities.

C. Individuals involved in Macomb County's Purchasing activities shall conduct their activities in good faith and shall use the resources, property and funds under their control wisely and in

accordance with ethical standards and legal requirements.

D. All county public servants shall, at all times, comply with any and all rules and regulations enacted by the County as defined in the Macomb County Ethics Ordinance. With respect to any provisions of this paragraph which overlap and/or conflict with the Ethics Ordinance the stricter of the two provisions shall govern.

E. Individuals involved in Macomb County's Purchasing activities shall conduct their activities to avoid the appearance of attempting to influence others or of being influenced by others to violate the ethical and legal standards for Macomb County's Purchasing standards.

Sec. 10.3. Employee Conflict of Interest/Bias

A. Public servants shall not participate directly or indirectly or influence or attempt to

influence any procurement, contract, purchase, order or invoice decision when the county employee knows or has reason to know that:

(a) the public servant's or any relative of the public servant has a financial interest related

to the procurement, contract. purchase order or invoice, decision or activity; or

15

(b) the public servant or a relative of the public servant is negotiating for or already has an

arrangement concerning employment with an individual or organization involved in the procurement, decision or activity.

B. Public servants who discover an actual or potential conflict of interest, relative to a

procurement, contract, purchase order, or invoice decision shall immediately disclose said

conflict and file a written statement of disqualification with the Purchasing Agent and the Board of Ethics and shall withdraw from further participation in the transaction.

C. The Board of Ethics may grant a waiver from the public servant conflict of interest provision upon making a written determination that:

1. the financial interest of the public servant has been publicly disclosed; 2. the public servant will be able to perform his/her procurement functions without

actual or apparent bias or favoritism; and 3. the award will be in the best interests of the County.

D. Individuals shall not engage in unlawful discrimination or prejudice based on race, religion, national origin, language, gender, political affiliation, disability, or age when involved in a procurement, contract, purchase order or invoice decision.

Sec. 10.4. Gifts or Financial Gain

Individuals involved either directly or indirectly in the procurement process and members of their immediate family are prohibited from the following activities:

A. accepting financial gratuities, gifts, offers of employment, expense paid trips, private vacations, or other special financial treatment and favors from any person or organization in connection with any direct or indirect involvement in a procurement activity or decision._

B. participating in or allowing situations in which any form of payment, gratuity or offer of employment is made by or on behalf of any contractor or subcontractor in an effort 10

influence the award of a contract with Macomb County.

C. accepting a commission, percentage, brokerage or contingent fee in exchange for assisting individuals or organizations to secure a Macomb County contract, purchase or invoice.

Individuals involved either directly or indirectly in the procurement process are NOT prohibited from the following activities:

A. accepting food or refreshment not exceeding $75 per person on a single calendar day in the course of conducting business with an individual or organization with whom Macomb County;s involved in business activities, provided the food or refreshment is (i) consumed on the premise

from which it was purchased or prepared or (ii) if it is catered. For the purposes of this Section,

16

"catered" means food or refreshments that are purchased ready to consume which are delivered by any means.

B (2) tlccepting only nominal gifts similar to advertising samples, from an individual or organization with whom Macomb County is involved in procurement activities.

Sec. 10.5. Confidentiality

A. Individuals are prohibited from using confidential or proprietary information received in the

course of their jobs to give any other individual or organization unfair advantage in Macomb County's procurement process.

B. Individuals are prohibited from u~ing confidential information received in thf' course of their procurement-related duties for personal gain, including but not limited to, financial gain.

C. Individuals have a duty to protect confidential information, gained through procurement dclivities, from being disclosed to other pnrties_

Sec. 10.6. Duty to Report

A. An employpp shall immediately report to the Board of Ethics and either his or her supervisor or department head any attempt by any other individual or organization to induce him or her to violate any of the ethical principles and guidelines in this Article.

B. A non-employee shall immediately report to the Purchasing Agent and the Board of Ethics any attempt by any other individual or organization to induce him or her to violate <lny of the

ethical principles and guidelines in this Article.

Sec. 10.7. Sanctions

A. An employee who violates the ethical principles and guidelines of this Article may be subject to discipline up to and including the termination of employment or to sanctions under the Macomb County Ethics Ordinance.

B. A non-employee, non-officer who violates the Ethical Principles and Guidelines is subject to the applicablp law and the following penalties as determined by the ~inance Committee after consulting with the Purchasing Agent;

1. written warning or reprimand;

2. termination of contract;

3. determination as a non-responsible contrdct bidder;

17

4. recovery by Macomb County of the value of anything given or received in violation of any provision of law, the Home Rule Charter of Macomb County, the Ethics Ordinance and this Article, including, but not limited to, monetary gifts, gratuities and kickbacks.

18

A Statement from Macomb County Executive Mark Hackel Regarding the Current Purchasing Policy Draft

October 18,2011

Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedbaek regarding the dran of a County Purchasing Policy currently under consideration. Members of the Executive staff have had conversations with some Commissioners during the past few weeks and have found common ground on some of the technical and procedural issues involved. Hopefully, that collaborative effort will result in a better policy for the County. But what haven"t been diseussed are Executive Office concerns for several Charter-related issues, and that is the purpose of this statement.

The drafters of the Charter reeognized that the existing Purchasing Poliey would be incompatible with the new executive form of government. As a result, Section 8.10 of the Charter was inserted requiring the Commission to develop a new way of handling purchasing. That Charter section is clear on what had to be done - the Commission will adopt a purchasing policy, the Executive will then implement the policy, and the policy must be consistcnt with the provisions of the Charter. Unfortunately. the proposed purchasing policy before you is not consistent with this new form of government and if enacted would violate the Charter in several ways.

First, in many instances it interferes with or.abridges the Executive's Charter-grantcd authority. The Charter stales that the Executive has the authority to supervise, coordinate, direct and control all County Departments except for those headed by countyv.ride elected officials. The Charter also gives the Executive the authority to prepare and administer the budget. As a result, the Commission has no policy or ordinanee authority to direct the purchasing manager, the finance director, or the director of the Department of Roads, or to administer the appropriations it has approved. These types of provisions are remnants of pre-Charter governance. In addition, the imposition of operational protocols such as the IFAS requisition process is not policy, but rather an implementation directive. The Executive is given the authority and responsibility under the Charter to determine how the policy will be implemented, and is free to select any method that fulfills that responsibility.

The proposed purchasing ordinance also violates the Charter and exceeds the authority of the legislative branch of County government when it imposes or assigns administrative and implementation functions to itself or its members. For example, inelusion of the Chair of the Commission in the "sale source procurement" proeess would exceed the Commission's legislative authority. Similarly, permitting committees of the Commission to make purchasing decisions, to consider deviations from the purchasing process, or to grant appeals would also infringe on the Executive's administrative authority and sole responsibility to implement the Commission's policy. Requiring sueh things as submitting a "confirming resolution" to the Commission is not a lawful exercise of the Commission's policy-making authority, because these types of requirements impose duties that go beyond the role of adopting policy and cross over into the role of implementing policy.

The separation of powers doctrine is perhaps the most fundamental principle in American political and constitutional thought. It is enshrined in the federal and state constitutions, as well

~ ID-,K-/I

as in the Macomb County Charter. Under this doctrine, the branches of government are separate but equal and one braneh cannot direct the actions or perfonn the functions of the other. That is what creates the system of ehecks and balances the people expect.

Under the prior fonn of government there were no checks and balances. The Commission set the policies and then administered the policies it created. The Commission authorized how much money could be spent and then decided who would receive it. Under the prior fonn of government the Commission was "in charge" of all eounty departments. Today it is not. Under the new Charter the Commission can no longer create policy and then administer the policy it creates. It cannot appropriate money and then decide who will receive it. And maybe most important, it can no longer direct the actions of the departments within the executive branch of government.

Simply stated, a fundamental element of the voter-approved Charter was the transfer of all administrative functions from the Commission to the County Executive. The policy under consideration fails to recognize this change.

Finally, Article 10 of the proposed ordinance has no place in the purchasing ordinance. The Commission's charge under the Charter is to establish policy for procurement. Article 10 goes well beyond that responsibility by attempting to delineate ethical responsibilities. Such responsibilities are best dealt with in the Ethics Ordinanee.

Just as was done for the technical aspects of this proposed policy, the Executive Office suggests that further collaborative discussion should occur before the proposed policy is adopted. By working through OUr respective legal counsel. we should be able to resolve any Charter-related issues before fonnal Commission action is taken. Your consideration of this request is appreciated.

RECYCLABLE PAPER

ID. RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: _

AGENDA ITEM: _


RESOLUTION TO concur in request of County Executive and approve a special one-time appropriation of $50,000 for the Drinking Water Monitoring System




Mark F. Deldin Deputy (ouuly Ewcutive

To: Kathy Vosburg, Board Chair t:J From: Mark A. Hackel, County Execuz . Date: September 28,2011

Re: Request for Special Appropriation for the Drinking Water Monitoring System

I am attaching a recommended plan that will provide for a one year continuation of the Drinking Water Monitoring System. This one year extension will provide time for a more permanent solution to be found. More specifically, I am asking that the Commission approve Recommendation 5, which is a special one-time appropriation of $50,000 to support this initiative. The attached plan provides more details on how the system would operate, the responsibilities of the local municipalities, and an estimated bUdget for the funds that would be contributed by both Macomb and St, Clair Counties. Please let me know if you require any additional information or assistance from my office or staff.

Thank you in advance for considering this request.

MACOMB COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT t!!81>0(, Mount Clemens Health Center

''If, 1113 ~ 43525 Elizabeth Road .. Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043

:i -< 586-469-5235 FAX 586-469-5885 . . macombcountymi.gov/publichealth1lJ'Ii ..

'c::'HIG po: Mark A. Hackel Steven C Gold, MP.R County E'(!culiv(! DireclorlHeallh Officer

Kevin P. Lokar, M.D. September 16, 2011 Medical Director

TO: AL LORENZO. ASSISTANT COUNTY EXECUTIVE

FROM STEVEN C GOLD, MPH, DIRECTOR/HEALTH OFFICER \) 'Y\. MACOMB COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ~~

STEPHEN N. CASSIN, AICP, DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

GERARD P. SANTORO, PROGRAM MANGER/LAND AND WATER RESOURCES, PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

GARY WHITE, RS., M.S., INTERIM DEPUTY HEALTH OFFICER MACOMB COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT

SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE DRINKING WATER MONITORING SYSTEM

Funds on hand as of 9/15/11 for operation of the Drinking Water Monitoring System (DWMS) equal approximately $73,000. However, invoices currently in the pipeline will reduce funds actually available to a much lower level, perhaps to under $40,000. At the current rate of spend-down these funds will be exhausted in the very near future. Critical decisions must be made.

This urgent question has been considered in recent weeks by the Macomb County Executive's Water Resources Advisory Council 0/VRAC), by a small executive group from the Health Department and the Planning & Economic Development Department, and by others with slrong interests in the DWMS, including the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), SI. Clair County, and the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG). The recommendations below reflect input from all of the above, though responsibility for this formulation of those recommendations lies primarily with Steve Gold, Gerry Santoro, and Gary White.

Recommendation 1:

The DWMS with its current configuration and functionality should be continued in all locations where the local governing entity is willing to assume responsibility, including financial responsibility, for operation and maintenance of the monitoring equipment provided originally with DWMS funds. Macomb County should formally request of each DWMS local governing entity that it assume that responsibility effective December 1, 2011. The current O&M agreement for the DWMS between Macomb County and

AI Lorenzo September 16, 2011 Page 2

Environmental Consulting and Technology, Inc. (ECT) should be terminated effective November 30, 2011.

Recommendation 2:

Unless the local governing entity specifically indicates otherwise, the assumption of responsibility for equipment specified in Recommendation 1 should not apply to any gas chromatograph/mass spectrometers (GC/MS) provided with DWMS funds. Not only are these devices extraordinarily expensive to operate, the DEQ has indicated that they cannot be effectively maintained, and are approaching obsolescence, The Recommendation 1 request from Macomb County should reflect this exception. Macomb County should assume responsibility for removal, storage, and disposal as appropriate of the GC/MS's utilizing remaining DWMS funds.

Recommendation 3:

For one year, beginning December 1, 2011, Macomb County and Sl Clair County should jointly and equally continue to support the real-time data visualization and notification/alarm capabilities which link the individual monitoring locations and create an integrated monitoring system, and shall also continue to support the publiclyaccessible data archive at 'MVW.rwqims.com. With St. Clair County's agreement, Macomb County should continue as the actual fiduciary.

Recommendation 4:

For that same year, Macomb and Sl Clair County should create, facilitate, and support opportunities for all DWMS local governing entities to convene periodically and discuss technical and logistical matters of mutual interest and concern, emphasizing but not limited to the use of the DWMS for environmental monitoring and for pUblic health surveillance. Other public and private-sector entities with an interest in the environmental and public health potentialities of the DWMS may be invited, and should be encouraged to participate in efforts to enhance the regional water monitoring system andfor to develop new sources of funding for it.

Recommendation 5:

Funds remaining in the DWMS account are insufficient to support Recommendations 24 above. Macomb County should provide, and Sl Clair County should be requested to provide, $50,000 each to support those efforts This allocation of funds would not create or imply any ongoing or additional financial responsibility of the two counties for the DWMS, but is intended to facilitate a year during which the local governing entities may pursue a regional governance structure and funding mechanism if they so desire.

APPENDIX A WATER INTAKES AND RESPONSIBLE MUNICIPALITIES

Plant/Intake

Port Huron Water Intake

Marysville Water Intake

51. Clair Water Intake

East ChinalChina Water Intake

Marine City Water Intake

Algonac Water Intake

Owner

City of Port Huron Contact: Bruce Brown, City Manager

100 McMorran Blvd. Port Huron, Mich. 48060 810-984-9740

City of Marysville Contact: Ghassan Hami, City Manager

1111 Delaware Marysville, Michigan 48040 810-364-6613 X-1323

City of 51. Clair Contact: Scott Adkins, City Superintendent

547 N. Carney Dr. St: Clair, Mich. 48079 810-329-7121

East China/China Twps. Conlact: John Randolph, East China Twp. Supv.

5111 River Rd. East China, Mich. 48054 810-765-8879

City of Marine City Contact: John Gabor, City Manager

303 S. Water SI. Marine City, Mich. 48039 810-765-8865

City of Algonac Contact: Chris Wilson, City Manager

805 Sl. Clair River Drive Algonac, Mich. 48001-0454 810-794-9361 X-218

PlantJlntake

Ira Twp. Water Intake

New Baltimore Water Intake

Mt. Clemens Water Intake

G. P. Farms Water Intake

Water Works Park II Intake Southwest Detroit Intake

Wyandotte Water Intake

Monroe Water Intake"

Owner

Ira Township Contact: Robert McCoy. Twp. Supervisor

7085 Meldrum Rd. Fair Haven. Mich. 48023 586-725-0263

City of New Baltimore Contact: Larry Smith. Mayor

36535 Green St. New Baltimore. Mich. 48047 586-725-2151 X-119

City of Mt. Clemens Contact. Doug Anderson, City Manager

1 Crocker Blvd. Mt. Clemens. Mich. 48043 586-469-6818 X-7

City of Grosse Pointe Farms Contact: Shane Reeside, City Manager

90 Kerby Rd. Grosse Pointe Farms, Mich. 48326 313-885-6600

City of Detroit Contact: Cheryl Porter, Asst. Director. Water

Supply Operations 735 Randolph ~ First Floor Detroit, Mich. 48226 313-926-8135

City of Wyandotte Contact: Joseph Peterson, Mayor

3131 Biddle Ave. Wyandotte. Mich. 48192 734-324-4540

City of Monroe" Contact: George Brown, City Manager

120 E. First St. Monroe, Mich. 48161 734-384-9144

* Equipment has been purchased but is not yet installed.

APPENDIX B OPERATIONS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY MUNICIPALITIES

Municipality Participation in the DWMS

Municipality participation in the Drinking Water Monitoring System (DWMS) requires, at a minimum, ongoing automated operation and maintenance of a mUltiparameter probe, transmission and reception of data, and participation in periodic meetings to discuss matters of mutual interest with other participants and interested parties.

Municipality Responsibility for Equipment

Except as specified under "GC/MS Special Provisions" below, the municipality will be responsible for operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement of all equipment originally provided with DWMS funds. This includes pipes, valves, flow cells, pumps, and all equipment and infrastructure associated with bringing source water to the monitoring equipment.

The municipality will perform monthly maintenance on the equipment, including calibration checks and analysis of quality control (QC) samples, and will make any necessary adjustments to the equipment identified as a result of calibration checks and QC sample results. The municipality will keep a maintenance log for each piece of equipment which will include at a minimum all the following: date, calibration information, equipment problems encountered, corrective actions taken and other pertinent information.

The municipality will keep on hand sufficient inventory of all supplies, replacement parts and calibration standards/solutions required to perform maintenance and calibration procedures.

The municipality will keep all equipment under regular observation for malfunctions and wili make identified repairs expediently. The municipality may choose to have operation and/or maintenance agreements with a vendor or vendors.

GCfMS Special Provisions

Macomb County wili uninstall and take possession of any GC/MS originally provided with DWMS funds, and will be responsible for the associated costs. A municipality may choose to keep its GC/MS under the terms and conditions stated above. (Note that disposition of the GC/MS's originally provided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to the Mt. Clemens, Grosse Pointe Farms, Waterworks Park, Southwest Detroit, and Wyandotte water treatment plants continues to be at the DEQ's sole discretion.)

Rev 9/30/2011

Internet Connectivity, Data Transmission and Visualization, and Personal Computer

The municipality will provide an Internet connection to assure that data from the monitoring equipment is transmitted in real time to the project database and a personal computer so data can be received and visualized by the municipality.

Macomb County will provide the data management system currently in place to assure that data transmitted by the municipality is received, processed, and transmitted back to the municipality and to other participating municipalities and regulatory authorities for real-time visualization. This will include the webinterface, data storage, and the notificalion system as they are currently designed and programmed. (Changes to the thresholds established for notification will require consensus by the participating municipalities and will be the municipalities' financial responsibility.) Maintenance of any hardware associated with the data management system, including the dala logger, will be the responsibility of the municipality.

Macomb County will provide all verified data to the publicly-accessible data archive (www.rwgims.com) and will be responsible for costs associated with the data archive.

Responsibility for Costs

Except as specified above, the municipality will bear all costs associated with the above activities. Macomb County's responsibilities and assumption of costs as specified above will end on November 30, 2012 except as extended or modified by other written and signed agreements.

Rev 913012011

APPENDIX C PROPOSED BUDGET

Assumptions

Expenses plus encumbrances will reduce funds remaining in the DWMS budget to essentially zero by November 30,2011,

The budget below is for a 12-month time perIOd beginning December 1,2011 and ending November 30, 3012,

Revenues

Macomb County"""""" "" ",,50,000

SI. Clair County""""" """""" "". "".""., ".50,000

Tolal revenues .. """'."""",,"" ," ""'''''''''' """"""" ",100,000

Expenses

Real-time 24/7 data visualization for water treatment plant operators and regulators; automated 24/7 notification/alarm system; associated O&M costs"""""""""""""",,,,,,,,,,,. 35,000

De-installation, preparation for storage, and storage of GC/MS's and any other equipment not to be kept and maintained by water treatment plant operators" '" '" """" ""15,000

Maintenance of public data archive (regional water quality information and management system; or "RWQIMS")" '''''','','' """ ", """.", '"'''''' '" ",20,000

Quarterly convening of water treatment plant municipality representatives and others for regional planning, policy, governance, and funding discussions; training; consultants ..... ".",,,,, "",,,,,,,,,,, .... ,.,,,,,, '''''' ",10,000

Other, extraordinary, and unanticipated expenses 20,000

Total expenses .... ,.... "" ,,,,,, ... 100,000

Format Dynamics:: CleanPrint:: http://ww\v.thetimeshera1d.com/articleI20110927/NEW... Page t of3

,

"'. i'''linlesherald !i:,·.·M X,;

Water watch maintained

The once-jeopardized drinking water monitors in the Sl. Clair River aren't going away -- for now.

St. Clair and Macomb counties have hashed out a new plan to keep most of the monitors active for the next year as officials continue to search for a stable funding source.

Without the revised plan, officials would have started shutting down the system in November, said Greg Brown, S1. Clair County Health Department's director of environmental health.

The Port Huron to Erie Drinking Water Monitoring System started in 2006 using federal grant dollars -- mainty $18 million from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -- to detect petrochemical spills from Samia's Chemical Valley, The monitors alert 13 water plant operators from Port Huron to Wyandotte to close their intakes if a spill is detected. The project was spurred into action as a response to a series of toxic spills by Canadian industries into the river in 2003 and 2004,

The new plan calls for municipalities with water monitoring equipment and their corresponding counties to shoulder the financial burden for the monitoring system. S1. Clair and Macomb counties will have to pay about $50,000 each, and cities will

have to fork over $5,000 to $10,000 for maintenance and operations costs, Brown said.

John Gabor, city manager for Marine City, said their council has been prepared for several years for federal grants to run out on the monitoring system.

"We had budgeted for that two years ago," Gabor said. "It's not detrimental to us."

Chairperson Jeff Bohm plans to request the approval for the $50,000 in funds at the Clair County Board of Commissioners meeting Ocl 5,

For Keith Eisen, supervisor at the 51 Clair Water Treatment Plant, the monitoring system requires little maintenance on his part. Specialized contractors re-calibrate the monitoring system at the intake site every two to four weeks, Eisen said. He Can access the real~time data on a slew of chemicals the system tests for on his computer at the plant -- from total organic compounds such as fertilizers and

Advertisement

I

I J Print Powered By ~ Dynam:cs

912712011http://www.thetimesherald.com/fdcp!?unique=1317]28325125

I

Fonnal Dynamics :: CleanPrint:: http://vyww.thetimesherald.com/article/20110927/NEW .. Page 2 of3

. xx .. 'linlesherald pesticides to volatile organic compounds that come from the petroleum-refining process.

A "big hit" would mean the plant shuts down its water intake, sends a test sample to Lansing and relies on its reserve supply of water until the spill passes by in a matter of hours.

"(The river water) goes through a lot between here and your tap," Eisen said.

Brown said the system has proven its worth.

"It definitely helped all the operators provide more assurance of safe water because they know what's coming," he said.

One of the more recent cases in which it saved a city time and money was in July, when the system detected abnormal pH levels in the St. Clair River in Port Huron. Brown said if the levels hadn't been detected before the water was pulled into the system, it could have resulted in the plant being shut down while it was flushed out and posed possible harm to the pUblic.

Though the new plan will continue operations for a year at a smaller region of water intakes -- from Port Huron to Mount Clemens -- Brown said this is just the beginning of discussions on a long-term solution.

The continuation of the water monitoring system has been called for heavily by family members of the eight children that

belong to the Wilms Tumor cancer cluster investigation, which began in April.

The investigation centers on eight cases of a rare childhood kidney cancer that have all been diagnosed since 2007 in the Marine City/China Township area, the Port Huron area and on the border of St. Clair and Macomb counties in Richmond.

Kristina Tranchemontagne of CottreJiville Township IS mother to 6-year-old Ashleigh, a Wilms Tumor survivor.

"That was really one of the things we've been hoping for," Tranchemontagne said.

Contact Amy Biolchini at (810) 989-6259 or abiolchini@gannett. com,

Advertisement

Print Powered By lJl DynamiCs

9/27/2011http://www.thetimesherald.com/fdcp/?unique~ t317128325125


Mark F. Deldin Deputy Coullt~ heculive

To: Kathy Vosburg, Board Chair

From: Al lorenzo, Assistant County Executive

Date: October 11, 2011

Re: Appropriations Request

Will A REPRESENTATIVE fROM THE COUNTY EXECUTIVE'S OFFICE BE PRESENT ON OCTOBER 18 TO

ANSWER QUESTIONS?

Yes. Steve Gold, Gary White, and Gerry Santoro will be present.

WHAT HAS BEEN THE INITIAL INVESTMENT FOR EQUIPMENT CURRENTLY IN PLACE?

The total direct cost of the project has been $3.4-3.5 million. Equipment purchase costs are estimated at approximately $1.8 million ± 10%. (Equipment costs for the portion of the project funded by the DEQ's Homeland Security grant would have to be requested from the DEQ; also, there have been equipment and parts replacements over the years, costs for which would have to be requested from the environmental consulting firm which has served as Project Manager.] This $1.8 million estimate does not include the costs of instaJling, operating, and maintaining the equipment, which would bring the total up to nearly the full amount.

WHAT MONITORING CAPABILITIES Will BE LOST DUE TO DECREASED FUNDING?

Funding: Under the proposed plan, there would be two funding streams. One stream would come from the participating municipalities, each of which would assume financial responsibility for operation and maintenance of the equipment in its water treatment plant(s). Dollar amounts would vary from municipality to municipality, depending on a number of factors, so the total expenditures from this funding stream might be as low as $60,000 or might be several times Ihat amount. The other funding stream, totaling $100,000, would come in equal shares from Macomb and S1. Clair Counties. The system could be kept in service with only those two funding streams, in only those amounts, because of the capability changes described below.

Changed Capabilities: Under the proposed plan, the monitoring capabilities of the System would remain unchanged except that the gas chromatograp'h/mass spectrometers (GC/MS's), which are expensive to operate, difficult and therefore expensive to maintain in good working order, and nearing

P age 12

the end of their useful lives, would be uninstalled and stored or othelWise disposed of. (A GC/MS currently installed in a municipality would remain in place if the municipality specifically agreed to assume responsibility for operating and maintaining it.) The TOC Analyzers and Fluorometers would remain in place, and would continue to monitor and detect levels of total organic carbon and total petroleum hydrocarbons. However, it would no longer be possible to identify in real time which if any of the 29 specific chemicals which can currently be detected by the GC/MS were present. With that one change, public water supplies will continue to benefit from the significant additional layer of protection provided by the system. Also, because the system's data communications infrastructure would remain in place, GC/MS or similar capacity could be added back to the system at a later date.

System-wide capabilities including real-time data management, alarm/notification functionality, and data archiving, would continue unchanged, and would be the responsibility of the two counties.

WILL THE SYSTEM WILL STILL BE INTEGRATED TO NOTIFY SYSTEMS DOWNSTREAM OF STATUS AND/OR PROBLEMS?

The proposed plan includes maintaining all existing data management functionality, including real-time visualization of data and alarm/notification capability, for all the currently-participating water treatment plants plus the Monroe plant, for which equipment has been purchased but not yet installed. Monroe authorities have indicated to the DEQ their willingness to install and operate their equipment.

WHAT ARE THE PLANS TO FORM A USERS' AUTHORITY TO MAINTAIN THE SYSTEM GOING FORWARD AS WElL AS THE TIME LINE, INCLUDING WHEN DISCUSSIONS Will BEGIN IF SUCH A GROUP HAS NOT YET BEEN DISCUSSED?

The proposed plan calls for Macomb County and St. Clair County to host and facilitate periodic meetings of the participating municipalities at which they would discuss whether and how they might continue to finance and operate the regional system beyond the one-year commitment made by Macomb County and St. Clair County. Other interested parties - universities, corporate foundations, private foundations, State and Federal agency representatives, etc. - would also participate in these meetings. A regional users' authority or other actual legal entity would be a primary desired outcome of these meetings, and would be formed when the participating municipalities reached consensus as to the relevant terms and conditions.

One South Main ". 9,n Floor" 1ft. Clemens, Michigan 48043 ". Phone (586) 469-7001 * Fax (586) 469-7257

RECYCLABLE PAPER

II.

RESOLUTION NO. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE

AGENDA ITEM


RESOLUTION TO adopt a County Drain Debt requirement of .0050 mill for inclusion on the December, 2011 millaqe levy

INTRODUCED BY: Don Brown, Finance Committee Chairman

Based on the 201112012 Drain Debt requirements outlined by the Public Works Commissioner, the County's At Large Drain Debt requirement is .0050 mill. The rate mayfiuctuate annually based on the repayment reqUirements and must be adopted for inclusion in the 2011 Macomb County Apportionment Report for the December 2011 millage levy. The levies for the last several years are outlined below:

December 2011 .0050 mill December 2010 .0050 mill December 2009 .0050 mill December 2008 .0055 mill December 2007 .0055 mill December 2006 .0055 mill December 2005 .0058 mill December 2004 .0058 mill December 2003 .0058 mill December 2002 .0060 mill December 2001 .0070 mill December 2000 .0080 mill

COMMITTEE/MEETING DATE

Finance, October 18, 2011

FINANCE DEPARTMENT ~.. C'l><..

10 N. Main Sr.. 12th Floor .r, IIII ~ Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043 ~ < 586-469-5250 FAX 586-469-5847. .

www.macombcountymi.gov1lJ-f1'<:'''''G~'' Mark A. Hackel COLlnly Execulive Pe!Gf M. ProvenZWIo, CPA

Finance Direclor

Stephen L. Smigiel, CPA

tntenm A,siiibnt finance DlJ1':ClOr

October 4, 2011

Commissioner Don Brown, Chaif and Members of the Finance Committee 9th Floor-Administrative Building Mount Clemens. Michigan 48043

Dear Commissioner:

Based on the 201112012 Drain Debt requirements outlined by the Public Works Commissioner, the CountY-At-Large Drain Debl Millage requirement is .0050 mill. As you know, this rate may fluctuate annually based on the repayment requirements and must be adopted for inclusion in the 2011 Macomb County Apportionment Report for the December 2011 millage levy.

Sincerely yours,

M-~ Peter M. Provenzano Finance Director

PMP:ts

RECYCLABLE PAPER

/;2. .

RESOLUTION NO. FULL BOARD MEETING DATE

AGENDA ITEM


RESOLUTION TO adopt a Veteran's Service millage rate of .0400 mill, less any millage reduction required by the Headlee roll back factor, for inclusion on the December, 2011 millage levy

INTRODUCED BY: Commissioner Don Brown, Finance Committee Chairman

State Law requires that the County annually adopt millage rates for inclusion in the annual Apportionment Report. On November 4, 2008, the voters of Macomb County approved a five (5) year Countywide .0400 mill operating levy for Veteran's Services for the operating budget years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. This levy is the fourth of the five years approved by lhe voters for this purpose. This millage will continue to be levied in December.

Voter Approved November, 2008 151 Levy December, 2008 2nd Levy December, 2009 3" Levy December, 2010 4th Levy December, 2011 5th Levy December, 2012


Finance, October 18, 2011

HNANCEDEPARTMENT ,,-!S <>D(, ION. Main Sr., 12th Floor

lit )ill ~ Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043 ~ -< 586-469-5250 FAX 586-469-5847. .

www.macombcQumymi.gov1lJit'C;","O"<' Mark A. Hackel Peter M. Prove~laIlO, CPACounty Executive

Fin.anc;e Duecror

Stephen L. Smigiel. CPA [n~rim As,i$ram Finance Direc(or

October 4, 2011

Commissioner Don Brown, Chair and Members of the Finance Committee glh Floor-Administrative Building Mount Clemens, Michigan 48043

Dear Commissioner:

State law requires that the County adopt millage rates for inclusion in the annual Apportionment Report. On November 4,2008, the voters of Macomb County approved .0400 mill for the Veteran's Services operations for the five years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

It will be necessary for the Finance Committee to adopt the proposed 2012 Veteran's Services operating millage rate of .0400, less any millage reduction reqUired by the Headlee rollback factor, for inclusion in the 2011 Macomb County Apportionment Report for the December 2011 millage levy.

Sincerely yours,

IU~ Peter M. Provenzano Finance Director

PMP:ts

RECYCLABLE PAPER

-/3.

RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:

AGENDA ITEM:

_

_


RESOLUTION TO

INTRODUCED BY:

approve 2011 Apportionment Report

Don Brown, Chair, Finance Committee

COMMITIEEIMEETING DATE Finance 10-18-11

- r%~ ~

.1 .II. _

!~,.,

.II

2011 APPORTIONMENT REPORT

Prepared by: Peter M. Provenzano Finanee Director

.- •• 1 I f _....:..··I ,II ~

•

I .It.,-;,

11111111IHHW111rH-----~-~----~~------p-• 2.. finns' 'Hn,r ;~

-'11J~" u •• u '

•

As Presented to tbe Finance Committee October 18,2011

HNA~CEDEP.~TME~T 1O~ . .\'lJin St.. l.2rh Floor

Mount Clemens, !\'1ichigan 48043 586·+69·5250 FAX 586'+69·58+7

www.macombCouIltymi.gO'i .~..._-_._

Pe'er .\;1. PfQ\'~nzano_ CPA

F"';lJlce Dired(}[

51r.rhen I. Smlgle!, CP."

lnlellm "";"'~"Wlll Fi"oillce Dire""",, October 18, 2011

Chairwoman Kathy Vosburg and

Members of the Macomb County Board of Commissioners

One S. Main, 9th FLoor

Mt.Clemens, MI. 48043

RE: 2011 Property Tax Apportionment and Tax Levy Report

The 2011 Apportionment Report is hereby submitted for your consideration and approval The report presents an in-depth analysis of millage rates and property taxes levied by the various taxing authorities

in the County. The General Property Tax Law requires the County Board of Commissioners to approve

the apportionment report at its regular session in October of each year and, upon approval, direct the

various taxing authorities in the County to levy the millage rates included in the report against all taxable

property located within their boundaries.

The apportionments ana millages included in lhe report give effect to:

1 Application 01 and compliance with Section 31 Article 9 of the State Constitution of 1963 as required

by Section 211 34d of the Michigan Compiled Laws (Headlee Amendment).

2 Public Act 206 of 1893, Section 31 (1), (MCLA 211.34 (1)), as amended. requiring rollback tax rates

when State Tax Commission increases equalized value of the County.

3 Public Act 213 of 1981, which amen cis Section 211.34 so that a Township or City would be restricted

to an operallng levy based on local assessed valuation rather than the full levy based on State

Equalized Valuation (Truth in Assessing Actl·

4 Public Act 5 of 1982, which added Section 211.24e, requiring counties, cities, villages, school

districts, townships, etc, that levied more than one mill for operating purposes to hold an advertised

pUbliC hearing for the purpose of increasing property taxes (Truth in Taxation Act).

5. Public Act 312 of 1993, which amends MCLA 380-1211 so that school districts shall levy not more

that 18 mills for school operating purposes or the number of mills levied in 1993 for school operating

purposes, whichever is less. Homestead property is exempt from the mills levied under this

subsection.

6. Total authorized taxes are shown even though a portion of said taxes may be spread at a time other

than the winter levy.

Chairwoman Kathy Vosburg and Members of the Macomb County Board of Commissioenrs

October 18, 2011 P.2of2

I respectfully request that the Board give consideration to the passage of the following motion:

'We, the Macomb County Board of Commissioners, do hereby approve the tax apportionment and

millages as contained within the attached report for the tax year 2011, and order same be entered at large on the County records and that this Board hereby direct that such of the several millages and

assessments proposed be levied for the County, Townships, Cities, Schools, highway, drain and all other purposes as shall be authorized by law, and be spread against the equalized values of properties upon the proper townships and cities in accordance with law,"

Please do not hesitate to contact my office should you have any questions regarding the enclosed information.

Sincerely you~,s, ..

, • ? / •

•~/,6/ " ~;,/,tt,~>/';'~"'~<'~""-

Peter M. Provenzano, CPA Finance Director

MACOMB COUNTY 2011

CERTIFIED TAX (MILLAGE) RATE TOTALS

1 MILL = $1 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE

GOVERNMENTAL UNITI local School Oismcl

HOMESTEAD TOTAL

NON. HOMESTEAD

TOTAl

PERSONAL COMMERCIAL

TOTAL

PERSONAL INDUSTRIAL

------.!Q:!:AL HOMESTEAD

TOTAL

PRIOR YEAR RATES NON, PERSONAL

HOMESTEAD COMMERCtAL TOTAl TOTAL

PERSONAL INDUSTRtAL

TOTAL

ARMADA TOWNSHIP Armada Romeo

27.1529 24,5835

45.152~

42.5635 33.1529 30.5635

21,152~

16.5635 (5) (5)

n.002~

24.2135 45.002~

42.2135 33.0029 30.2135

2'.0029 18.2135

BRUCE TOWNSHIP Romeo Armaae Alroont (Lapeer County)

29.761~

32.3513 329464

47.7619 50.3513 50.948<l

35,761~

36,3513 36,9464

23.7619 26.3513 26.9484

(5) (5) (1) (5) (8)

29.4119 32.2013 32.7984

47.4119 50.2013 50.7984

35.4119 36:<'013 38.7984

23.4119 26.2Cl13 26,7984

CHESTERFIELD TOWNSHIP New Haven L'Anse ereuSE Andlor BiIY

31,6324 31.6324 34.8324

49..6324 4~.6324

52.6324

37.8324 37.8324 40.6324

25.6324 25.6324 26.6324

{51 (5) (5)

3'.6824 316624 34.6624

49.6824 49M24 52.6624

37.6824 37,6624 40.6624

25.6624 25.6624 26.6824

CLINTON TOWNSHIP Mt, Clemens Ch,ppewa Valley Chnlondale Fraser L'An~ Crt!Use

40.6339 n.2612 42.2612 36.6312 366312

56.63.:19 5.52612 59.0455 54.6312 54.6312

46.6339 432812 470455 42,6312 426312

34.6339 31.2612 362612 3(1,6312 30.6312

(5) (5) (5) (5) (5)

40,6539 371012 421012 364512 36,4512

58.6539 55.1012 56.S6S5 54,4512 54,4512

46.6539 43.1012 46.S655 424512 42.4512

34.6539 311012 3ll.1012 30,4512 30.4512

HARRISON TOWNSHIP L'Anse CmuS!:' 296167 47.6167 35.6167 23.6167 (6) 29.6650 47.6650 35.6650 23.6650

LENOX TOWNSHIP Anchor Bay New Haven Richmond Armada

32.21~

29.2709 26.2709 30.1103

50.2709 47.2709 44,2709 46.1103

38.2709 35.2709 32.2709 36,1103

2(1.2709 23.2709 20.2709 24.1103

n,1209 29.1209 26.1209 29.9lI03

5lJ.1209 47,1209 44.1209 47.9603

361"lOil 35.1209 32.1201i1 35.9603

26.1209 231209 20.1209 n9603

MACOMB TOWNSHIP Chippewa Vailey L'Anse Creul;e New Hawn

"",'

28.2709 276209 27.6209 244709

46.2709 45.6~09

45.6209 42,4025

Jol.2709 336209 33.6201i1 30.4025

222709 21.e209 21.6209 16.4709

(5) (5) (5) (5)

26.1209 27.4709 274709 24.2209

48.1209 4s.4701i1 45.4709 42.1525

34.1209 33.470Y 334709 30.1525

22.1209 21.4709 21.4709 18.2209

RAY TOWNSHIP Ulica New Haven Arma~a

Romeo

23.43~6

26.5800 27.-4290 24,83&6

41.3712 4<1.58915 45.4290 42.6396

293712 32.5696 334290 30.8396

17.4a~6

20.5696 21.4290 18.8398

22.8635 26.1135 26.9529 24.1635

407951 4<1.1135 44.9529 42.1635

26.7951 32.1135 32.952;} 30 1635

16.81535 20,1135 20.9529 181635

SEE ATTACHED FOOTNOTES

MACOMB COUNTY 2011 CERTIFIED TAX (MILLAGE) RATE TOTALS

1 MILL '" $1 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE

PRIOR YEAR RAT!:5 NON PERSONAL PERSOAAL NON_ PERSONAL PERSONAL

GOVERNMENTAL UNlTI HOMESTEAD HDMESTEAD COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL HOMESTEAD HOMESTEAD COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL local School DistriCt TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL -------!Q.TAL

RICHMOND TOWNSHIP Armada 273~25 45,3525 33.3525 21.3525 27.0325 45,0325 33.0325 21.0325 RichmDnd 235131 41,5131 29.5131 17.5131 23.1931 41.1931 29.1931 17,1931 Memphi~{Sl Clair Cly) 2l5/1597 44.11597 32.11597 20./1597 (2) 26.3197 44.3791 32.3197 203191

SHELBV TOWNSHIP ut.. 29.1622 41.1136 35.1136 23.1622 26.9322 461:l636 34.8636 22.9322

"'~O 30,5622 41l.5622 36.582"2 24.5822 30.2322 4/1.2322 36.2322 24.2322 RQchester(Oakla~dCly) 32.4582 50.4582 36.45/12 21545112 (3) 32,3082 50,3062 36,3062 26.3082

WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP

""00 26.60611 4660118 34.80118 22./10/16 (5) 28.4586 46.4588 34.4588 22,4588 Utica 27.4088 45,34C14' 33.3404 21.4088 (5) 27.1568 45.0904 33.0904 21,15SS RocheSler(Oakland Cly) 30.6846 48,8648 36.6548 24.6848 (3) (5) 30,5348 48.534/1 36.5348 2U348 Romea(Wocdl3l1d Acras) 28./1088 48.8088 34.8088 22.8088 (5) 28,4588 46.4588 34.4588 22.4588

CITY, CENTER LINE Center Line 62.5103 67.6345 67.6345 ~5103 55.2493 60.5848 605848 49.2493 Van Dyke 54.7345 12.1345 80.7345 48.7345 4\n754 1J7,7154 55,1154 43.7154

CITY. EASTPOINTE East ~trQil ' 4/1.2436 68,2438 54.2436 42.2436 46.9801 648801 52.9801 4{J,9801 $OIJlt1 Lake 51.1252 64,8652 57.556/1 45.1252 48.8117 82.1511 55,6433 438117

CITY, FRASER Fl<Iser 41.1!la1 59.1962 47.1982 351962 41,0205 59.0205 47.020S 350205

CITY, GROSSE POINTE SHORES Soulh Lal<e 43.6538 56.5~J9 49,4655 37.6539 40.6039 53.5439 46.4355 34.6l139

CITY, MEMPHIS MerTlllhis(Sl Clair Cly) 37.8142 55.6742 4351<12 316742 (2) 31,3B42 55.313.<12 43.3<l42 31.3<l42

CITY, MOUNT CLEMENS Mount Clemens 43.6034 61.8034 49,8034 37,8034 (5) 43.5182 61.5182 495182 31.5182 l'Anse Cre.'le 41.36:3-'l 59,3834 473834 353/134 (5) 41.0962 59,0982 <170982 35.0982

CITY NEW BAlTIMORE AnchDr Bay 40.9728 58.9728 45.9728 34.912.8 40./1538 586538 46.8S36 34.8535

CITY, RICHMOND Rictlmond 31Hl~9 54.6648 42.8849 30.6849 38.534" 54,5349 42.534!l 30.5348

SEE ATIACHED FOOTNOTES ,

MACOMB COUNTY 2011 CERTIFIED TAX (MILLAGE) RATE TOTALS

1 MILL= $1 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE

GOVERNMENTAL UNIT/ loca,' SchOOl D<slr;cl

HOMESTEAD TOTAL

NONHOMESTEAD

TOTAL

PERSQ,'lAL COMMERCIAl.

TOTAL

PERSONAL INDUSTRIAL

TOTAL HOMEST~D

TOTAl

PRIOR YEAR !'lATES NON· PERSONAL

HOMESTEAD COMMERCLA.l TOTAL -----!QTAl

PERSO,,"'AL INDUSTRLA.l

TOTAL

crN, ROSEVillE RO~illi!

Fraser 45.0123 44.4123

63.0123 62,4123

51.0123 50,4123

39,0123 39,4123

43.9623 44.2623

61.9623 62.2623

49,9923 5.0.2623

37,9623 39,2923

CITY, ST. CLAJR SHORES Lake Share Lakeview l'Anse Creuse Soulh Lake

41.569~

42.1665 42,3995 45.6701

59.5695 60.16!l5 50.399!> 56.9101

47.5995 48.1585 49.3895 51.7017

35.5995 36.1995 35.3995 39.0701

(9) 37.9729 39.3929 40.9229 427545

55.8729 57.3929 56.9229 55,6945

43.6729 45,3929 4fi.9229 49.5861

31.8728 33.3928 34.9228 3575~5

CITY, STERLING HEIGHTS UtIca Warren Consolidaled

32.5691 39.5502

5{1,4997 50.1545

39.4997 455602

26,!>991 33.5602

32.3191 3ll,6211

50,2497 50.0045

382497 44.6271

26.3181 32.6271

CITY, UTICA Ulica 41.5fl21 MI,5137 47,5137 35 5921 41.6117 59.5433 47,5433 35,6117

CITY, WARREN WSmiln Col\Solid~(ed

WllfTen Woods Van Dy\Q! Fitzgerald CMter Line Enl Delreil

44.6969 40.7247 40.9247 41,9247 49,6005 40.9247

!>5.2611 56,7247 59.8247 59.9247 53.7247 59,6247

50,6668 46.7247 49.9247 47,9247 537247 46.9247

39.6698 347247 34.6247 35.8247 42.9005 34.9247

43.9337 40.1347 42.6653 41.TT47 49 1392 39.6747

55.1111 56,1347 60.6653 59.7747 53.4747 67.6747

49,9337 46.13047 49.6653 47.7747 53.4747 45.6747

379337 3041347 36,61153 35.774'7 42.1392 33.6747

VIL~

ARMADA (ARMADA TWP.)

Am>,'" 40.4071 584071 46,Ml71 34.4071 (5) 40,2221 56.2221 46,2221 34.2221

ROMEO (BRUCE TOWNSHIP) Romeo 37.9029 5l1.9029 43,9029 318029 (5) 37 ~~29 5!>.5529 435529 31.5529

ROMEO (WASHINGTON TWP.) Romeo 39731J 56.7313 44.7313 32,7313 (5) 36.3613 ~6,3913 44.3613 32.3613

NEW HAVEN (LENOXTWP) New Ha~en 41.9759 59.97!>9 476759 35.6759 41 7259 !>97259 47.7259 35.7258

SEEATIACHED FOOTNOTES ,

•••

•••

•••

€ ••• • •• "'OD"''''''' •:!:~;! ;!;!;! ;!;!;!;!;! •NNN NNN "''''NNN ;; o CI 0 cioe cicicicio o

000 000N __000 ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~

cieidci <)'='00CIcio cioooci o

II cicio.. g~~

~"z.'w 8"00 00 o

gg.. cd

*i!~... ..;,j

:ll~li: NNN

.om";

00.

U."""""'<>i

8888 "'>0'"'' '"'.",,,.,,,,cicicid

8 000000000000 ;503;;;!i;!i;

cidcidcioo

000 "" '" """"" ... """ '" '" 000 '" ~ "",,,,,,,,""'U)U)U)

.,;.,;.,; .,-,.,,.;,.;,.;

888: 888 &: ~ ...... ,..:

888 ggg __ N

"''''''

0°2;1;8"""olSo",;:{;:;!!i;:;

8 00

8 88 00

~~~

~ ~.'_..,.., "l ~ .............

N NNN

............... "! ""'! '"

gg8~ ;Zgg~

;::;~';:; ~

0000 0000

g~~~

,'"'' '" U) '" '" CD '":ll:R:R:8..- ... ..; ...

..,.,,.,".............',>0,>0,,,,,"''''U)'''.., .........

~~~~ .............. "! "l "! "'.

~g~~ .... 8"'''' .... ..:..:'" N ., .""

MACOMB COUNTY 2011 CERTIFIED TAX (MILLAGE) RATES SUMMARY 1 MILL = $1 PER $1,000 OF TAAABLE VALUE

GOVERNMENTAL UNITi Local School Oislricl

HOMESTEAD SCHOOL

NONHOMESTEAD

SCHOOL

PERSONAL COMMERCIAL

SCHOOL

PERSONAL INDUSTRIAL

SCHOOL COMMUNITY

COLLEGE INTERMEDIATE

SCHOOL

CITY. VILLAGE OR TOWtlSI'IP

COUNTY OPER.

COUNTY VETERAN

COUNTY Dun SMART

<00 AUTHORITY "C~

RICHMOND TOWNSHIP Armada Richmond Mem;>his(SI, Clair CIY)

13,839~

10.0000 12,6600

31.8394 26.0000 30.6800

1U39~

160000 18.6600

1.8394 4.0000 6,6600

1.5112 1.5112 Ui112

2.9430 2.9430 3.4296

34608 3.4606 3.4806

~.5685

~.5885

4.5685

0.0400 0,0400",,,,

OO~O

0.0050 0,0050

05900 0.5900 0.5900

0.1000 0,1000 0,1000

0.2HIl 0.2146 0.2146 (2)

SHELBY TOWNSHIP UUca Romeo Rocholalllr(Dal<Jand CIY)

9.8500 11.2500 127000

271&\6 292500 30.7000

15.76\6 17.2500 16.7000

3.6500 S.2S00 6.7000

'.5712 '.5112 1.5712

2.9430 2.9430 3.3690

9.2999 9.2999 9.2999

4.5565 ~.568S

4.5665

0.0400 0,0400 0.0400

0.0050 0.0050 0,0050

0,5900 0.S900 0,5900

0,1000 0.1000 0.1000

0.21~6

0.21~6

0.21~6 (3)

WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP

R"mao U~·C8

Rod1...t....(Oal<laod CIY) Romao(Woodland Acrea)

11.aOO 96500

12.7000 11 2500

29,2500 27,7818 30.7000 29.2500

17.2500 15.7611> 16.7000 11 2500

52508 38500 67000 5.2500

1.5712 1.S712 1.5712 1,5712

29430 29430 3,3690 29430

75265 7.5265 7.5265 7 5265

4.5665 4.5685 4.5685 4,5665

8,0400 0.0400 O.MOO 0.0400

0,0050 0.0050 00050 00050

0.5900 0.5900 0,5900 05900

0,1800 0,1000 0,1000 01000

0.2146 0.21~6

02146 02146

(5) (S) (3) (5) (5)

CITY, CENTER LINE Calltll1" Una Van OV"'a

20,7758 13,0000

25.9000 noooo

25,9000 19.0000

14.7758 7.0000

1.5712 1.5712

2.9430 2.9430

31.7022 317022

4.5665 4,5665

00400 0.0400

0.0050 0,0050

0,S900 0,5900

0.1000 0,1000

0.2146 0.2146

CITY, EASTPOINTE Eaal Detroit Soulh Laka

13,0000 16,4816

31.0000 29.4216

19.0000 22.3132

7.0000 10.4616

15712 15712

2,9430 2.9430

25,2113 26.2113

4.5665 4.5685

0.0400 O.MOO

0.0050 0.0050

0.5900 0.5900

0,1000 a 1000

0,2146 0.2146

CITY'-RASER F'ner 13,0000 31.0000 19.0000 7,0000 1.5712 2.9430 16.7659 4.5lI85 0,0400 0,0050 0.5!l00 0.1000 0.2146

CITY, GROSSE POINTE SHORES South Laka 1B,~til~ 29.4216 22.3132 \O.~aI6 1 5712 2.9430 17,1400 ~.5665 0.0400 O.OOSO 0.5900 01000 0.2146

CITY. MEMPHIS Memphis(SI Clair Cly) 126600 30.6600 18.8600 66600 1.5712 3.42911 1~,2953 4.5685 0,0400 00050 0,5900 0,1000 02146 (2)

CITY, MOUNT CLEMENS Mounl Clama~J

L'An$a Creulle 15.4200 13.0000

33.4200 31.0000

21.4200 19.0000

9.4200 7,0000

1.5712 1.5712

2.9430 2.&430

18.3511 18,3511

4,5665 4.5665

0.0400 0.0400

00050 0.0050

0.S900 0.5900

0,1000 0.1000

0.2146 0.2146

(5) (5)

CITY, NEW SAlTIMORE Anchor Ba1 16.0000 34.0000 22.0000 10.0000 15712 2,9430 149405 4.5685 0.0400 0.0050 0.5900 0.1000 0.2146

CITY. RICHMOND RichmQ'ld 10,0000 28.0000 16.0000 4.0000 1.5712 2,9430 \6.6526 4.5685 0.0400 0.0050 05900 01000 0,2146

,SEE ATTACHEO FOOTNOTES

MACOMB COUNTY' 2011 CERTIFIED TAX (MIlLAGE) RATES SUMMARY 1 MILL a $1 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE

GOVERNMENTAL UNITI Local School District

HOMESTEAD SCHOOL

NON· HOMESTEAO

SCHOOL

PERSONAL COMMERCIAL __SCHOOL

PER30HAJ,. INDUSTRIAL

SCHOOL COMMUNITY

COLLEGE INTERMEDIATE

SCHOOL

CITY, VilLAGE OR TOWNSHIP

COUNTY _OPER

COUNTY VETERAN

COLJNTY DEBT SMART

>00 AUTHORITY HCMA

CITY, ROSEVIllE RO$"~;II.. Fraser

13.6000 13,0000

~1.eOoo

31,0000 1geOao 19.0000

7.6000 7.0000

1.5712 1.5712

2.!lo430 2.\1-'130

21.3800 21.3eOO

4.5685 4.5685

0.04C0 0.0400

0.0050 0.0050

0.5900 0.5900

0,1000 01000

0,2141l 0.2141l

CITY, ST CLAIR SrlORES lake Shore lakeview L'Anse Cre\lM South l ....e

12,2000 12.7900 13.0000 16,4616

30.2000 3O.raOO 31,0000 29,4216

le.2000 le.7S00 19.0000 22.3132

6,2000 6.7800 7.0000

10,4616

1,5712 1.5712 1,5712 1.5712

2,!lo430 2.1),430 2.9430 2.9430

19.3562 19,3562 19,3562 19.3562

4.5e65 4.5665 4.5665 4.5665

0,0400 0,0400 0.0400 0.0400

0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 0,0050

0,5900 0,5900 0,5900 0.5900

0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0,1000

0.2146 0.214ll 0.2141l 0.2146

(9)

CITY, STERLING HEIGHTS LJ~ca

Warren Con'lOlidsll':d 9,6500

16.6421 27,7616 27,4384

15,7616 22.9421

3,6500 10.8421

\.5712 1.5712

2,9430 2.9430

12.6656 12.8858

4.5665 4.5665

0.0400 0.0400

0.0050 0.0050

0.5900 0.5900

o 1000 o 1000

O,2141l O,2141l

CITY, LJTICA Uijca 9.9500 277616 15.7616 3.6500 15712 2.9430 21,6996 4.5665 0.0400 0.0050 0,5900 o 1000 0,2141l

CITY, WARREN Warren Consolidated Warren Wood. Van Dyke Fitzgerald Cenlllr line Eas! Deln;l\l

16.8421 12.9000 13.0000 14.1000 20.n58 13.0000

27,4364 30,9000 31.0000 32.1000 25,9000 31,0000

22.6421 18.9000 19.0000 20.1000 25,9000 19.0000

10.6421 6.9000 7.0000 ...1000

14.ns.. 7.0000

15712 1,5712 1,5712 1.5712 1 H12 1.H12

2.9430 2,9430 294'0

<"'"2!lo43O 2.9430

11.H24 11.7924 17,7924 17.7'124 17.7924 17.7924

45885 45685 45685 4,5565 4.5665 4.5665

0(10100 0.0400 0.0400 00400 00400 0.0400

0.0050 0.0050 0.0050 O.OO~O

00050 0.0050

o 5!Kl0 959'00 0.5900 0.5900 05900 0,5900

0.1000 0,1000 01000 01000 0,1000 0,1000

0.2146 0.2146 0.2146 0.2146 0.2146 0,2146

VILLAGES

ARMADA (ARMADA lWP.) Armads 13.6394 31.6394 19.63!lo4 7...394 1.5712 2.!lo43O 16.53~ 4.5685 0.~4oo ~0~5~ 0,5900 0,1000 0,~14e (5)

ROMEO (BRUCE TOWNSHIP) Romeo 11.2500 29.2500 17.2~00 5,2500 1.5112 2.900 1&e~06 45S65 ~.0400 ~.0050 0.5900 0,1000 0,21~6 (5)

ROMEO (WASHINGTON TWP.) ,=~ 11.2500 29.2500 17,2500 $.2500 1.5712 2.9430 174490 45665 0.0400 0.0050 0.5900 01000 0,2146 (5)

NEW HAVEN (LENOX lWP.) N.....-Havun 13.0000 31,0000 19.0000 7.0000 1.5712 2.9430 16.6418 4.5665 ~.0400 0.0~50 0,5900 0,1000 0,2146

,SEE ATTACHED FOOTNOTES

MACOMB COUNTY 2011 CERTIFIED SCHOOL TAX (MILLAGE) RATES 1 MILL'" $1 PER $1,000 OF TAXABLE VALUE

GOVER.NMENTAl UNIT/ La""1 S<t1ool Di.llid ""

OPERATING NON -

HOMESTEAD OPERATING

'"

OPER.ATING PERSONAL COMERCIAL

SINKING FUND ~

HOMESTEAD SCHOOL

NONHO'-liESTEAD

SCHOOl

PERSONAL COIolMEA.CIAL

SCHOOL

PERSONAL INDUSTRIAL

SCHOOL

ARMADA TOWNSHIP Armada Romeo

6.0000 6.0000

16.0000 16.0000

0.0000 0.0000

6.0000 6.0000

0.63~'

1.Z500 7.0000 4,0000

13.6394 112500

31l>394 29,2~00

19.8394 17.2500

7.B394 5.2500

eRUCE TOW'NSHIP Romeo

'm"""A1monl (Lapeer C""my)

6.0000 6.0000 6,0000

160000 18.0000 160000

0.0000 0,0000 0,0000

6,0000 6.0000 6.0000

1.2500 0.6394 0.0000

4.0000 7.0000 6.'500

11.2500 13l>394 14.4500

29.2500 31.8394 32,4500

17.2500 19.1>394 20.4500

5.2500 7.63-" 6.4500 (0'

CHESTERFIELO TOWNSHIP N.... ".ven L'MHCreusv .l\nChOr Bay

6.0000 8.0000 6.0000

16.0000 16.lIOOO 16.0000

0.0000 o,aooo 0.0000

60000 6.0000 6.0000

0.0000 0.0000 O,aooo

7.0000 7.0000

10.0000

13.000ll 13.0000 16,0000

310000 31.0000 34.0000

190000 19.0000 22.0000

7.00ll0 7.0000

10.0000

CLINTON TOWNSHIP '-Ill Oernene ChipPIl""" Valley C1inll;ndale Frn.... l·M... C,,,,,se

6.0000 5.0000 6.0000 6.0000 6,0000

180000 160000 16.7643 160000 16.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.0000 6.0000 4.7643 6.0000 6.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

9.4200 7.6500

1'--6500 7.0000 7.0000

1504200 I~.6500

1116500 13.0000 13.0000

33.4200 31.S500 35.4143 31.0000 31.0000

21 4200 19.6500 23.4143 19.0000 19.0000

9,4200 7.6500

12.6500 7.0000 1.0000

HARRISON TOWNSHIP L'AnHC,",use 6.0000 18.0000 0,0000 6.0000 0.0000 7.0000 13.0000 31,0000 190000 7.0000

LENOX TO~SHIP

Mcho' e"Y New Haven RichmOlld

""""". MACO'-llB TOWNSHIP

Chippewa Valey L'Ans" Creuse New Ha..... n Utica

6,0000 6,0000 6,0000 6.0000

6,0000 6.0000 6,0000 6.0000

16,0000 16.0000 16,0000 18.0000

18,0000 16.0000 180000 \7.~316

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

6.0000 6.0000 6.0000 6,0000

6.0000 6.0000 6.0000 5.9316

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8394

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

10.0000 7.0000 4.0000 7.0000

7.6500 7.0000 7.0000 3.8500

16.0000 13.0000 10.0000 13.6394

136~00

13.0000 13.0000 9.6500

34.0000 :310000 260000 3163-"

31.6500 31.0000 31.0000 27.7616

2200Gll 19.0000 16.0000 19,8394

19,6500 190000 1~.OOOO

15.7616

10.0000 7.0000 •.0000 7.6194

1.e5OO 7.0000 7,0000 3,8500

RAY TOWNSHip U~ClI

N".... Hav80 Armeda,,

6.0000 6.0000 6000ll 6.DDOO

17.9316 16.0000 16.0000 16,0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 D.Oooo

5.9316 6.0000 6,0000 '.0000

0,0000 0.0000 0.6394 1.:Z500

3.6500 7.0000 7.0000 4.0000

9,B~00

13,0000 13.6394 11.~500

27.7816 31.0000 31.6394 29.2500

15,7616 19,0000 19,8394 17,2500

3.8500 7.0000 7.6394 5.2500

SEE ATTACHEO FOOTNOTES ,

SEEATTACHEO FOOTNOTES •

--

••

• •

.. g_n

" ~" n""

g"<ri:£

~I gg..-.n"

o ci

00<>", o <> 0 <:>_000., n 0<> <:> <D

§0

g .

§•.,;.,;.,;,,; " o o"

000<1> gg§ "go. g8.0. ~o8<Dci00 ooc:i",

on ~. ° gn"o.

ci •"

8g §00 §C!C! o•

MACOMB COUNTY 2011 TAXES LEVIED BY TAXING UNIT

MACOMB COUNTY 2011 TAXABLE VALUE BY PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION

PERCENTAGE OF PERCENTAGE OF TAXING UNIT TAXES TOTAL TAXABLE VALUE REVENUE SOURCE COUNTY $ 119,214,898 11.23%

SMART $ 15,245,664 1.44% AGRICULrURAL $ 121,389,859 0.47%

HCMA $ 5,545,360 0,52% COMMERCIAL $ 3,793,238,407 14.68%

MACOMB ZOOLOGICAL AUTHORITY $ 2,584,044 0,24% INDUSTRIAL $ 1,631,341,453 6.31%

TOWNSHIPS $ 113,603,1BO 1070% RESIDENTIAL $ 17,962,447,199 69.52%

VILLAGES $ 5,201,914 049% DEVELOPMENTAL $ 2,719,040 0.01%

STATE EDUCATION TAX $ 155,042,676 14.61% PERSONAl- COMMERCIAL $ 683,847,572 2.65%

LOCAL SCHOOLS $ 310,433,016 29.25% PERSONAL - INDUSTRIAL $ 1,127,378,301 4.36%

INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS $ 76,093,376 7,17% PERSONAL· UTILITY $ 518,084,069 2.00%

COMMUNITY COLLEGE $ 40,600,509 3.83% TOTAL $ 25,840,445,900 100.00%

CITIES $ 217,822,377 20.52%

TOTAL $ 1,061,387,214 10000%

COUNTY SMART HCMA PERSONAL PERSONAL UTILITY 11,23% . 1.44% r 0,52% INDUSTRIAL 200%

I 4.360/0 AGRICULTURAL\ / MACOMB PERSONAL

/(~ 0.47%.\ ZOOLOGICAL

COMMERCIAl---AUTHORITY

2.65% 0,24%

~ COMMERCIAL TOWNSHIPS 14.68%

1070%

DEVELOPMENTAL 0,01%

VILLAGES

049%

INDUSTRIALSTATE 6.31%

EDUCATION TAX 14,61'Y" RESIDENTIAL

69,51",

LOCAL SCHOOLS 2925%

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 TAX LEVY - COUNTY WIDE TAXES

EXTRA MACOMB VOTED TOTAL LEVIED ZOOLOGICAL

TAXABLE ALLOCATED VETERANS DEBT BY COUNTY AUTHORITY HCMA SMART TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL UNIT VALUATION 4.5885 0-0400 0.0050 4.6135 0.1000 0.2146 0.5900 5.5181

TOWNSHIPS: ARMADA $ 217,239,543 $ 992,459 $ 8,690 $ 1,086 $ 1,002,235 $ 21.7:24 $ 46,620 $ 126,171 $ 1,198,750 BRUCE 401,613,303 1,834,770 16,065 2,008 1,852.643 40,161 86,186 236,952 2,216,142 CHESTERFIELD 1,486,515,718 6,791,147 59,461 7,433 6,858,041 148,652 319,006 877,044 8,202,743 CLINTON 2,746,774,959 12.548,641 109,871 13,734 12,672,246 274,677 589,458 1,620,597 15,156.978 HARRISON 676,798,228 4,014,790 35,152 4,394 4,054,336 87,aBO 186,590 518,491 4,849,297 LENOX 272,795,872 1.246.268 10,912 1,364 1,258,544 27,280 58,542 160,950 1,505,316 MACOMB 2,603,154,432 12,606,211 112,126 14,016 12,932,353 280,315 601,557 1,653,861 15,468,086 RAY 183,807,880 839,726 7,352 919 847,997 18,361 39,445 108,447 1,014,270 RICHMOND 129,198,749 590,244 5,166 648 596,056 12,920 27,726 76,227 712,931 SHELBY 2,673,757,626 13,128,762 114,950 14,369 13,256,061 267,376 616,708 1,695,517 15,857,682 WASHINGTON 1,125,478,155 5,141,747 45,019 5,627 5,192,393 112,546 241,528 664,032 6,210,501

CITIES: CENTER LINE 166,751,108 853,172- 7,470 934 661,578 18,675 40,077 110,183 1,030,511 EASTPOINTE 541,503,325 2,473,858 21.660 2,708 2,498,226 54,150 116,207 319,487 2,988,070 FRASER 472,706,223 2,159,558 18,900 2,364 2,180,830 47,271 101,443 278,897 2,608,441

GROSSE POINTE SHORES 10,944,813 50,001 436 55 50,494 1,094 2,349 6,457 60,394 MEMPHIS 18,143,470 82,868 726 91 83,705 1,814 3,694 10,705 100,118 MOUNT CLEMENS 366,552,181 1,674,594 14,662 1,833 1,691,089 36,655 78,662 216,266 2,022,672 NEW BALTIMORE 350,816,989 1,602,707 14,033 1,754 1,618,494 35,082 75,265 206,982 1,935,643 RiCHMOND 169,554,006 774,608 6,782 B48 782,238 16,955 36,386 100,037 935,616 ROSEVILLE 1,027,021,976 4,691,950 41,081 5,135 4,736,166 102,702 220,399 605,943 5,667,210 ST. CLAIR SHORES 1,548,948,840 7,076,373 61,958 7,745 7,146,076 154,895 332,404 913,880 6,547,255 STERLING HEIGHTS 4,207,728,500 19,223,000 168,309 21,039 19,412,356 420,773 902,979 2,462,560 23,218,668 UTICA 196,360,793 897,074 7,854 982 905,910 19,636 42,139 115,653 1,063,538 WARREN 3,624,279,129 16,557,519 144,971 16,121 16,720,611 362,428 777,770 2,138,325 19,999,134

COUNlY TOTAL: $ 25,840,445,900 $118,052,075 $1,033,618 $ 129,205 $ 119,214,898 $ 2,564,044 $ 5,545,360 $15,245,864 $ 142,590.166

Estimated Capture by TIFA, DDA and ClA--- $ 152,936,403 (698,690) (6,117) (765) (705,572) (15,293) (32,818) (90,234) (643,917) (7)

NET TAX COLLECTION: $117,353,385 $1,027,501 $ 128,440 $ 118,509,326 $ 2,568,751 $ 5,512,542 $15,155,630 $ 141,746,249

SEEAITACHED FOOTNOTES "

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES TAXES LEVIED

1FT TAX RATE PER $1000 SEV

GOVERNMEf'ITAl UNIT I 'OF TAXABLE CITY OR ZOO 1FT TAXES local School Oislric! CERTIFICATES VALUE SCHOOLS TOWNSHIP COUNTY SMART AUTHORITY HCMA TOTAL LEVIED

Armada TOWllship Armada Schools - Posl 1993 Romeo Schools - Post 1993

J, , 332,650 1,773,860

21.1766 19.8821

1.6406 1.6406

2.3061:1 2.3061:1

0.2950 0.2950

0.0500 0.0500

0.1073 0.1073

25.5765 24.2818 43,072

Bruce Township Romeo Schools· Posl1993 " 47,192,059 19.8821 4.2398 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 26.8810 1,268.567

Chesterfield Township New Haven Schools-Post 1993 9 10.402.300 20,7571 4.4001 2.3061:1 0.2950 0.0500 0,1073 27,9162 290,393 L'Anse Creuse SChools - Posl1993 J2 15.614.780 20,7571 4,4001 2.3068 0,2950 Q.05(lO 0.1073 27.9162 435,905

Clinlon Township Chippewa Valley Schls . Pas! 1993 , 943.300 21.0821 6.7995 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 30.6406 28.903 Fraser Schao\~ - Post 1993 2 2,097,600 20,7571 6.7995 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 30.3156 63,590 L'Anse Creuse Sthaals _Pest 1993 " 47,079,500 20,7571 6.7995 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 30.3156 1,427,243 Clintondale Sdlaals· Post 1993 3 329,600 22.9643 6.7995 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 32.5228 10,719

Harrison L'Anse Crellse Schoals - Pesl 1993 8 1.905.770 20.7571 3.3922 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 26,9084 51.281

Macomb Township ChiPP41W3 Valley Schls - Past 1993 12 16,378,620 21.0821 2.2943 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 26.1355 426.063

Shelby TOWllship Utica Schaols - Pasl1993 12 12,502,629 19.1479 4.6500 2,3068 0.2950 0.0500 0,1073 26.5569 332,031

WII$hin9lan Tawnship Rameo Schools· Pasl1993 7 627,360 198821 3.7633 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 26.4044 16,565

Center linll, City of center lioo Schools - Post 1993 J 1.530,624 18,2071 15,8511 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 Jt>.8173 56.353

SEE ATIACHED FOOTNOTES 12

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES TAXES LEVIED

1FT TAX RATE PER $1000 SEV

GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I Local School Dislrict

'0' CERTIFICATES

TAXABLE VALUE SCHOOLS

CITY OR TOWNSHIP COUNTY SMART

ZOO AUTHORITY HCMA TOTAL

1FT TAXES LEVIEO

Fraser, City of Fraser Schools(Rehab)· Po,\l99J Fraser Schools - posl 1993

2

" 2.829,991

26,078,829 35.5142 20.7571

18.7659 9,3830

4.6135 2.3068

0.5900 0.2950

0.1000 0.0500

0.2146 0.1073

59.7982 32,8991

169,229 857,970

Memphis, Cilyof Memphis - Post 199) 1 79,500 20.9304 7,1477 2.3068 0.2950 0,0500 0.1073 30.8371 2,452

Movn! Clemens, City of Mount Clemel1ll Schools - Post 1993 , 3,014.024 21.9671 91756 2,3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 33.9017 102,181

New Baltimore, City of Allchor Bay Schools - POSt 1993 , 1,841,900 'l2.2571 7.4703 2,3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 32.4664 59.837

Roseville. City of Rosel/ille School:> - Post 1993 Fraser Schools - Posl1993

13 1

6,619,228 37~,090

21.0~71

20.7571 10.6900 10.6900

2.3058 2.3066

0.2950 02950

0.0500 0.0500

0.1073 0,1073

311.5052 311.2052

228,4Q04 12,830

Saint Clair Shores, City 01 Lake Shore 1 l,~07,SOO 20.3~71 9.6781 2.3068 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 32.7943 49.441

Sterlin9 Hei9hts, City 01 Wamm Consolid Schls - Post 1993 Uti..a Sdlools - Post 1993

30 33

164.894,700 244,322,700

18.9753 19.1479

6.3429 6,3429

2.3068 2.3068

0.2950 0.2950

0,0500 0,0500

0.1073 0.1073

25.0773 28,2499

4,629,790 6,902,080

UlIca. City of Uli~ Schools - Post 1993 3 580.427 19.1479 10.8.0199 2.3065 0.2950 0.0500 0.1073 32,7569 19,013

Warren, Cily of Center Line SChools - Posl 1993 East Detro~ Schools· Pos11993 Van Dyke School' - Post 1993 Fitzgerald SChools - Posl 1993 Warren Consolidalild - Post 1993 Warren Woods Schools· Post 1993 Warran Coosolidaled (REHAB)- Posl1993

18 3

21 21 20 12 10

39,003,911 817,259

8,744,293 56,607,409

143,492,762 6,157,020

64,842,630

18.2071 20.7571 20.7571 21.3071 18.9753 21:1.7071 31.9506

8.6962 8.8962 8.6962 8.8952 8.8952 6.8962

17.7924

2.3065 2.3065 2.3066 2.3068 2.3008 2.3066 4.5135

0.2950 0.2950 0,2950 0.2950 0.2950 0,2950 0.5900

0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0.0500 0,1000

0.1073 0.1073 0.1073 0.1073 0.1073 0.1073 0.2146

29.8624 32,4124 31.4124 32.9624 30.6306 323624 55.2611

1,164,748 20,007

283,423 1,672,506 4,395,262

26'l,304 3,563,275

TOTAL 1 932,529,941 $29,069,437

SEE ATIACHEO FOOTNOTES 13

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 TIFA, DDA, AND CIA TAXES CAPTURED

TAXES CAPTURED

GOVERNMENTAl UNIT! Local School Dlsl.~c.t

Armada TDWflShip Armadll Schools

Bruce TO'in'lship Romeo SChools

ODA

OoA

BASE YEAR

2069

1986

EXPIRATION DATE

2033

tIIA

INtTlAL VALUE

$ 5,420.120

1,505,230

$

CAPTURED VALUE

fl93,630

2,106,050

$

SCHOOLS CITY I

TOWNSHIP

$ 2,276

17.675

COUNTY

$ 3.200

9,725

ZOO SMART AUTHORITY

$ <0, 69

1,244 211

HCMA

,,' $

"2

TOTAL

6,103

29,507

Clinton Town'hip Clinlol1dale MI Clemens

DDA oDA

2002 2002

2017 2017

50,382,987 14.926,956

13,948,506 1,491,466

189.664 22,941

&4,351 6,861

6,230 860

1,395

", 2,993

320 266.653

31.171

ShelbY TlJWIlshlp LIliea Schools utica Schools

riFA DDA

2005 2006

"<A 2031

22,580 88,303,057

',690 4,157,375

« 36,663

22 19,160

3 2,453

0

'" 1

'" "61,604

Washington TOWrlShlp Romeo SChools DDA 1990 "A 2,440,162 3,081,258 23,191 14,215 1,818 30' '51 40,193

Cerller Une, City of C~n'er Line Schools DDA "'" 2023 18,779,740 4,493,371 142,450 20,730 2,551 ." ,5< 167,244

Ea.slpoint~, City of East Delroit DDA 1987 "<A 3,831,270 4,808,977 121,266 22,191 2,838 ." 1,032 141,808

MOIJnl Clemeos, Cily of MoUl'll Clemens SChools TiFA "65 2021 El,15El,500 11,172,458 205,027 51,544 8,592 1,117 2,396 266,618

New Baltimore, City of AnchOi Bay Schools And'>or Bay Schools

DOA TlFA

1El89 198El

2010 NlA

2,453,825 9,286,000

2,247.459 4,507,100

33,578 87,338

10,389 20,764

1,326 2,659

225 .51

<92

'51 45,960 92,209

Richmond, City or Richmood TlFA 1984 2025 8,062,ElO7 28,768,944 495,730 137,339 17,564 2,977 6,386 659,998

SEE ATIACHEO FOOTNOTES "

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 TIFA, DDA, AND CIA TAXES CAPTURED

TAXES CAPTURED

GOVERNMENTAL UNITI Local School Ois.trict st. CI(lir Stlores. City 01

Lakeview SO...th lake Lake Shore lsl(elliew

South lake

TIF'A TIFA CIA CIA C~

BASE YEAR

'9" 1987 2007 2007 20"

EXPIRATION DATE

»A »A »A »A NIA

INITIAL VAlUE

6,950,412 14,757,016 44.885,100 29,a10,600 24,Sn,600

CAPTURED VALUE

7,241,388 14,510,0&4

0 0 0

SCHOOLS CITY I

TOWNSHIP

140.282 280,860

0 0 0

COUNTY

33,436 86.9<12

0 0 0

SMART

4,276 8,561

0 0 0

ZOO ALJTHORITY

no 1,451

0 0 0

HCMA

1,555 3.11'1

0 0 0

TOTAL

160,274 360,928

0 0 0

Sterling Heights, Clty 01 utica Utica Wamln COnsolidated

TIFA TIFA LDf'A

2002 2006 2008

2032 2026 Z021

391,400 28,090,900

3,921.700

3,532,450 0

2,754,950

44.812 0

34,949

16,297

0 12,710

2,084 0

1,825 '"0 275

758 0

'" 64,304

0 50,150

Utica, City of Ulica TIFA 1991 2012 13,119,625 15,080.279 326,805 69,481 8,886 1,506 3.232 409,910

Warren, Cil~ of Cenler Line Schools Van Dyke Schools Warren Consolidated SChools

TOTAL

DDA T/FA DDA

2002,2002

2042 2011 2042

9,702,751 12,155,613

408,394,246

• 812,616,577 $

2,701.480 9,389,193

15256,292

152,936,403 • ('J

48,066 167,056 271,446

• 2,674,339

12,463 43,317 70,385

• 705,572

1,594 5,540 9,001

• 90,234

270 90'

1,526

•__ 15,293

580 2,015 3,274

• 32,818 $

62,973 218,867

~632

3,518,256

SEE AnACHED FOOTNOTES "

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 RENAISSANCE RECOVERY ZONE TAXES LEVIED

RENAISSANCE ZONE RATES RENAISSANCE ZONE TAXES LEVIED

GOVERNMENTAL UNITI LoclIl School Dis\ricl

Bn..ce TO'NfIshlp Romeo Schools Romeo Schools Romeo Schools Romeo Schools Romeo Schools Romeo Schools

1FT?

YES

YES

EXPIRATION DATE

2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2022

, TAXABLE

VALUE

279,781 731,920

1,880,315 551,530 614,140

19,487

SCHOOLS DEBT

4.1500 2.0750 4.1500 2.0750 4.1500 4.1500

CITY OR TOWNSHIP DEBT SPECiAlS

0.0000 5.5300 0.0000 2.7&50 0.0000 5.5300 0.0000 2.7650 0.0000 5.5300 0.0000 5.5300

COUNTY DEBT

O.OOSO 0.0025 0.0050 0.0025 0.0050 0.0050

TOTAL

9.6850 4.8425 9.6850 4.6425 9.6850 9.685Q

SCHOOLS CITY OR TOWNSHIP DEBT DEBT SPECIALS

, 1,161 $ , 1,547 $ 1,519 2,024, 7,803 $ , 10.398 $ 1,1 44 1,525

• 2,549 $ , 3,396 $ 81 108

COUNTY DEBT

1 2 9 1,

TOTAL

, 2,709 3,545, 18,210 2,670, 5,948

189

Chesterfield Township L'Anse Creuse New Hawn New Haven

~020

2015 2020

1,212,131 8,117,795

614,350

7.1500 7.1500 7.1500

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

5.0000 5.0000 5.0000

0.0050 0,0050 0.0050

12.1550 12.1550 12.1550

6,667 58,042 4,393

6,061 40,569

3,072

5 41,

14,734 96,672

7,466

Clinton Towtnhip L'Anse Creuse L'AnSIl Crause L'Anse Crause L'Anse Creuse L'Anse Creuse L'Anse Crause L'Anse Creuse L'Anse Creuse Freser Fraser Chippe'o'r.l Varle)' Clinlondalll

YE'

YES

YES

YES

2019 2019 2020 202(1 2022 2022 2024 2024 2020 2021 2023

"22

553,400 167,900 329,700

4,876,819 242,600

1,402,100 241,500

1,-495,352 527,800 559,000 556,700 263,100

3.5750 7.1500 3.5750 7.1500 3.5750 7.1500 3.5750 7.1500 7.1500 7.1500 7.6000

12.8000

0.2000 0.4000 0.2000 0.4000 0.2000 0.4000 0.2000 0.4000 0.4000 0,4000 0,4000 0.4000

4.5000 9.0000 4.5000 9,0000 4.5000 9.0000 4.5000 9,0000 9,0000 9.0000 9.0000 9.0000

0.0025 0.0050 00025 0.0050 0.0025 0.0050 0.0025 O.OOSO 0.0050 0.0050 0,0050 0.0050

8.2775 16.5550

8,2775 16.5550

6.2775 16.5550

8.2775 16,5550 16.5550 16,5550 17.2050 22.2050

1.978 1.200 1,179

33,454 857

10,02.5 864

10,692 3,772 3,997 4,342 3,368

111 57

"1,672 49

'51 " '98

2H

2" 22' 10S

2,490 1,511 1,484

42,109 1,092

12,619 1,067

13,458 4.748 5,031 5,010 2,368

1 ,, 23

1 7 1 7,,, 1

4,560 2,779 2,730

77,456 2,009

23,212 2,000

24.755 8,134 9,255 9,578 5,842

Len(l~ Township New Haven 2020 20,476 7.1500 0.0000 4.1450 0.0050 11.3000 145 85 231

Mllcomb TownShip Chipp~a Vaile)' Chippewa Valle)' Chippewa Vall8'f Chippewa Valle")' L'Anse Crause Chi~wa VlIlle)'

YES

YES

2020 2020 ,015 2015 2015 2016

981,040 2,427,240 1,268,190 4,671,190 1,833,880

926,650

7.8000 J.'iiooO 7.8000 3.9000 7.1500 7.6000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.0586 0.5294 1.0588 0.5,94 1.05611 1.0588

0.0050 0.0025 0.0050 0,0025 0.0050 0.0050

8.6638 4.4319 6.8638 4.4319 6.2138 8.8638

7,652 9,466 9,676

16,996 11.681

7,228

1,039 1,285 1,341 2,579 1,730

981

, 5 8

12 8 5

8,696 10,757 11,223 21,569 13,419

6,214

SEE ATTACHED FOOTNOTES 15

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 RENAISSANCE RECOVERY ZONE TAXES LEVIED

RENAISSANCE ZONE AATES RENAISSANCE ZONE TAXES LEVIED

GOVERNMENTAL UNITI local School Distri(;'\

Shelby Township Utica Schools Utica Schools Utica Schools

EXPIRATION 1FT? DATE

2014 2015 2017

TAXABLE VALUE

4,304,270 1,551,750 1,485,570

SCHOOLS DEBT

4.0000 4.0000 4.0000

CIT)' OR TOWNSHIP DEBT SPECIALS

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

COUNTY DEBT

OOOSO 0.0050 0.0050

TOTAL

4,0050 4.0050 4.0050

SCHOOLS DEBT

'7,217 6,207 5,942

CiTY OR TOWNSHIP DEBT SPECIALS

COUNTY DEBT

22 6 7

TOTAL

17,239 6,215 5,949

Washington Township Romeo Schools Romeo Schools RI)l11BO Schoolll RQllTIeo Schools Romeo Schools

YES YES

2023 2020 2023

"'''' 2018

180,670 485,600

1,057,180 21.260

642,900

2.0750 2.0750 4.1500 4.1500 4.1500

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000

1.8743 1.8743 3.7485 3.7485 3.7485

0.0025 0.0025 0.0050 0.0050 0.0050

3.9518 3.9518 7.9035 7.9035 7.9035

375 1,008 4,387

66 2,668

339 910

3.963 60

2,410

1 5

,

714 t,9lS 8,355

166 5,081

Fraser, City of Fraser Fraser YES

"fA "fA

1,858,195 677,725

7.1500 3.5750

1.2879 0.6440

0.0050 0.0025

8.4429 4.2215

13,286 2,423

2,393 436

9 2

15.666 2.661

Mount Clemens, City of Mount Ciemens Schools 2020 977.542 9.5700 0.0000 O.OOSO 9.5750 9,355 , 9.360

Ne.... Baltimore, City of Anchor Bay Schools 2014 1,224,690 10,1500 3,7660 0.0050 13.9210 12,431 4.612 6 17.049

RoseVille, City of Roseville RoseVille Roseville

2015 2016 2017

726,a06 1,235,289 2,141,576

7.7500 7.7500 7.7500

1.1510 1.1610 1.1610

0.0050 0,0050 0.0050

8.9160 8.9160 8.9150

5,631 9,573

16,597

644 1,434 2,466

4 6

11

6,479 11,013 19.094

Sterting Heights, City of Warren Consolidated 2013 1,221.100 2.5900 0.3548 0.0050 2.9498 3.163 433 6 3,602

Warren, City of (;elller Line Warren Consolidated

TOTAL

2013 2013

$

31,277,039 49,306,981

137,541,713

2.0500 2.5900

0.0000 0.0000

0.0050 0.0050

2.0550 2.5650

64,118 127,705

, 528,318 $ 16,n3 , 178,489

156 247

$ 656

64,274 127,952

$ 324,216

SEE ATTACHED FOOTNOTES 17

MACOMB COUNTY ESTIMATED 2011 NEIGHBORHOOD ENTERPRIZE ZONE TAXES LEVIED

NEZ TAX RATE (New Certl"catnl = 16.5670 NEIGHBORHOOD ENTERPRIZE ZONE TAXES

GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I LOCAL SCHOOL DISTR.ICT Moun! Clemens. City 01

MOl,In! Clemens SChools Mount Clemens SChools

TOTAL

NEWI REHAB

REHAB,ew

BASE YEAR.

"'" 2007

EXPIRATION '0'DATE CERTIFICATES

2022 "2016 "

TAXABLE VALUE

• 300,965 691,262

• 992,247

LOCAL SCHOOLS

$ 10.0~B

6.193

$ ~1 $

COMMUNITY INTERMEDIATE COLLEGE SCHOOLS

'" '" ,,, '"

'" . 1.431

CITYQR TOWNSHIPS

5,523 3,401

$ 8,924

COUNTY SMART

1.389 '"." ----!.Q!..

$ -----.l,244 $ 287 $

ZOO AUTHORITY

'" " .. 'C""

" " '"

TOTAL

16,602

~

S 30,055

SEE ATIACHED FOOTNOTES "

MACOMB COUNTY FOOTNOTES TO 2011

APPORTIONMENT REPORT

(1) Almont School District is serviced by Lapeer Intennediate School District.

(2) Memphis School District is serviced by 81. Clair Intermediate School District.

(3) Rochester School District is serviced by Oakland Intermediate School District.

(4) School Taxes Can only be captured to make required payments on "eligible obligations", "eligible advances", or "other protected obligations". Thus an estimate of captured school taxes in not practical.

(5) Library millage is included in the "CITY, VILLAGE OR TOWNSHIP" column.

(6) Harrison Township millage is sUbject to approval by voters on Novemober 8, 2011. (Rates shown assume the passage of the millage proposal) •

(7) The estimated taxes to be collected are based on gross collections. See the schedule on pages 14 & 15 for an estimate of how much of this gross will be captured by TIFA's, DDA's and CIA's.

(8) Almont Community Schools Operating millage is subject 10 approval by voters on Novemober 8, 2011. (Rates shown assume the passage of the millage proposal) •

(9) Debt mills shown for Lakeview Public SchoOls (6.78) agrees with the Board approved Debt Levy. The actuai Debt millage levied was 1 mill higher due to a clerical error. This error will be corrected by reducing the 2012 Board approved Debt levy by 1 mill.

19

RECYCLABLE PAPER

/4.

RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: _ AGENDA ITEM:


RESOLUTION TO: AUTHORIZE THE CLERK/REGISTER OF DEEDS TO HELP

VETERANS RECEIVE THE RECOGNITION FROM AREA BUSINESSES THAT THEY

DESERVE BY OFFERING VETERAN PHOTO 10 CARDS AND CHARGE A FEE NOT

TO EXCEED $10 PER CARD FOR THE SERVICE. THE REVENUE SHALL BE

CREDITED TO THE COUNTY CLERK WHEN CONSIDERING BUDGET CUTS.

Background: Many businesses offer veterans a discount as a way to express gratitude for their service to our county. However, the veleran must be able to show proof. Veterans often do not carry proof of their service.

The county clerk maintains records of military discharge certificates for "DD214" forms. Veterans have the option to file this form with the county clerk. It is a large paper form thai does not easily fit in a wallet, is quickly wrinkled or torn from being carried, and can easily be lost as a result, risking disclosure of the veterans' personal information.

The Michigan Department of Veterans Affairs offers health care ID cards to veterans, but those are only available to veterans who are eligible for certain VA health care benefiLs.

To help make it easier for veterans to idenlify themselves as velerans, and to take advantage of services and discounts offered by area businesses, the county clerk wants 10 offer the option to veterans 10 purchase a veteran photo ID card. The clerk's office already has the equipmenI 10 produce the 10 with the existing concealed pistol license 10 printer and software. This is an innovative way 10 use existing staff and equipmenllo offer a new service that is voluntary to the public, bu( which would also generate revenue. A different color card and design than the concealed pistol license permit cards would be used for the veterans 10 cards.

The veteran would be required to provide photo identificalion, such as a drivers license, and a-copy of their 00214 in order to get a veteran photo ID card from the counly clerk's office. Veterans have the option to have their OD214 on file with their local clerk if they make the request to the Department of Veterans Affairs. The instructions to file a copy of a DD-214 with the county clerk for safekeeping is online at hltpJlwww.macombcountymi.gov/clerksoffke/MilitaryRecords.hlm.

INTRODUCED BY: COMMISSIONER DIMARIA, CHAIRPERSON JUSTIC & PUBLiC SAFETY COMMIHEE

COMMIHEE/MEETING DATE: JPS COMMIHEE 10-11-11 -A. ~ f r() v<-.d.. \=t",,,,,,co-. \ 0-\~ -"

Veterans are not required to get a county veterans photo 10 card. The card would be recognized on a voluntary basis by businesses and third parties. The county veterans 10 card would not be official verification that a person is a veteran and is nol a substilu(e for an official U.S. Military 10 card. Veterans are also not required to have a 00214 on file wilh the county clerk.

Many counties around the country offer this service. Other Michigan counties that offer the service are Emmet County and Charlevoix Counly.

The idea was suggested to Macomb County Clerk I Register of Deeds Cannella

Sabaugh by veteran Fred Humig.

Here is a sample of the Veteran's Identification Card (final version will look different)

-,dACOMB':coU~nY CLERK'REGISTER 'OF DEEDS 'if.:TERArJS IDH~;IFiCh.TlO~,1 i2":'RG

I -.;\IC. - II

.\,,~,~ r;:;,U',l"-:J'I:·:, ll'll<tf' -ifl j,l fK"l"

If this resolution is approved the Macomb County Clerk/Register of Deeds, Carmella Sabaugh, plans to issue the first Macomb County Veteran's Identification Card on Veteran's Day, November 11,2011.

Page 2 of2

RECYCLABLE PAPER

/5.

RESOLUTION NO. _ FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: _ AGENDA ITEM: _


RESOLUTION TO: CONSENT TO THE CLERK/REGISTER OF DEEDS RECOMMENDATION TO IMPLEMENT AN ENHANCED SEARCH REAL ESTATE "SUPER INDEX' CONSUMER PROTECTION SYSTEM THAT WILL IMPROVE THE WAY PUBLIC REAL ESTATE RECORDS MAY BE ACCESSED AND INCREASE THE ABILITY TO DETECT fRAUD, AT A ONE-TIME COST NOT TO EXCEED $330,006.72 AND AN ANNUAL COST NOT TO EXCEED $37,000, or $0.08 PER DOCUMENT PLUS $25,000. FUNDING IS AVAILABLE IN THE REGISTER OF DEEDS AUTOMATION FUND

Background: This resolution will launch a pHol project to provide Macomb County property owners with one of the nation's best tools to protect their property rights, reduce the risk of fraud, and make real estate transactions more transparent thanks 10 a partnership with ACS, Inc, a Xerox Company, Google, and the Macomb County Clerk I Register of Deeds. The public will have an easy and reliable method of checking all recorded claims, liens and other transactions involving their property.

"No person shall ._. be deprived of ... property, without due process of law .. " Fifth Amendment, United States Constitulion.

One of the best ways property owners can protect their interest in property rights IS to have notice regarding all transactions recorded against their property. The role of the county register of deeds is to provide information and public notice of all claims against property within the county. Easy access to recorded information regarding liens, assignments of mortgages and foreclosures is crucial to preserving property rights, and prOViding a level playing field between homeowners, lenders, developers and the real estale industry.

A recent episode of CBS's, "60 Minutes", revealed how access to images of mortgage assignments recorded at the county register of deeds' office helped expose real estate fraud involving forged foreclosure documents. To get an understanding of some of the real estate fraud issues, see video of the 60 Minutes segment at http://www.cbs.com/primetime/60 minutesJvideo/index.php?pid=CzUKTPuRNBcG rBEgSMW F27hKjSsZGyP (14 minutes).

Although all recorded documents are available for public inspection, the type of fraud exposed in the 60 Minutes report could not be easily delected by using the traditional Grantee-Grantor Index, or even a Tract Index. This type of index only identifies documents based on the names of the parties or the property description of land involved in a particular transaction.

INTRODUCED BY: COMMISSIONER DIMARIA, CHAIRPERSON JUSTIC & PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

COMM1TTEE/MEETING DATE: JPS COMMITTEE 10-11-11

~\I"""'U- \O-\~·\\

Under the current system, the type of fraud highlighted in the 60 Minutes episode can only be detected by manually looking through individual images in a multi-million image database 10 identify forged notary signatures on mortgage assignments recorded by several different banks. Implementation of the Super Index will enable documents to be searched based on any typed information contained in a recorded document - not just by the name of the parties or the property description.

The Macomb County Register of Deeds accepts hundreds of thousands of real estate images for filing annually:

Year Docs recorded Pages recorded Recording fees rec'd

2010 140,332 463,968 $1,600,305

2009 136,904 465,057 $1,661,694

2008 140,093 478,270 $1,692,366

2007 169,857 692,701 $2,404,198

Since 2008, the Macomb County Clerk / Register of Deeds has met budget targets by reducing staff by 20% while cutting over $900,000 from the b·udget.

The Super Index will provide a way for Macomb County property owners to obtain easy access to public land records through an easy-to-use Google search interface. This pilot project will use the entire grantor/grantee index pIus images from 2005 to the present, and have a method of including day-forward data and images.

This project does not replace, but enhances the capabililies of both the grantor-grantee index and the tract index project Once the tract index is implemented, data from that index will also be incorporated in the Super Index, providing even more improvement to Macomb County's public land records system.

Attached is a fixed price quotation for this project from ACS, Inc., a Xerox Company. ASC, Inc. was selected by the Register of Deeds through a public competitive bid process lo provide the original Register of Deeds computer and software system, and this project is an enhancement to it.

The Register of Deeds believes this value-added servioe will also be a revenue source for the county. The Register of Deeds envisions charging $5 per online search plus $1 to plint a public document, which is the current online charge. However, the final charge has not yet been determined.

The law requires the Register of Deeds automation fund to be spent on Register of Deeds

Page 2 of3

search technology. The Register of Deeds automation fund is created from recording fees paid by customers who file documents. The fund is restricted by the state for the purpose of Register of Deeds lechnology improvements like the one in this resolution.

"The county register of deeds of each county shall expend the fees credited to the fund under section 2567 ... for upgrading technology in the register of deeds office, with priority given 10 upgrading search capabilities." MCl 600.2568(2) (emphasis added).

Macomb County Clerk I Register of Deeds Carmella Sabaugh will be present at the commitlee meeting to answer questions.

Page 3 of 3

ACS IS now a Xerox company A xerox ....' Cornpany

Seplember 27, 2011

Carmella Sabaugh Macomb County Clerk/Register of Deeds 40 North Main Street Mount Clemens, MI 48043

Dear Carmella:

This letter will serve as a fixed price quotation and statement of work from ACS Government Records Mangement (ACCS GRM) for Professional Services to develop a Proof of concept (POC) Super Index search capability built on the Google Search Appliance (GSA). Information on the GSA can be found at the Google web site or hltp:/www.google.comfenterpl.ise/searchfgsa.html. ACS GRM will develop the Super Index search capability modeled on the following:

Super Index mr'<A.~'I. '.b'U9h

':I~,k/R~Il';W 0' D••d, P~o"e, (Sa')'6.·""

c; a'T'1 7:

• Page2 Seplember 27,2011

Please notice that this is just a simplir,ed change to the screens that are used by lhe Siandard Google Search Screens that are used daily by millions of users across lhe United States and the world.

The user would enter information in the same way they enter into information from Google.

Here are a few examples:

A\.ACS

'" )U~fl)ll i,; [OTpo.~·

iii.i'i4#~+.fi£:$'':;''''"~,;, yi4'f+\6;;A~ii?W_fq,,"l)'i~i'I(':~ M;;""iB'd..rli'H?~.»l'" ~"'" :kol>:1?k.iiii#.l..iJii#·P'Ai;;ii;.ti>

. ,,' '

mU"','~'I~ tiab"'U9~

<;I.<l<fI\_,,~,. '" D,,,,,p,,,,", .... ,.,,,\s~"l§n~J3er Index ~"~4 [';';f~"",,1

September 27,2011 • Page 3

IICa ....," ~olI'U9h

C'e"'JR'90""" .,I: [;e,~, pI","" (5".1"'·'11'I~~w~rolndex MH'·~"'.S.,,··,',

c,~

r""'~~Q! ~hi~~edf,g lJil;ky I

September 27, 2011• Page 4

m{~_d~ ~_."~h

~It_.~""'f '. o:;..Oipr,."" (~J")4d-"Sl

September 27, 2011• Page 5

IICann~lI.. ~.b."9b

C'.........9"\,.., 0' c,.,~,

p~on", (~'(;,;Pl"""Suger IndexI John Harvell Warranty Deed 201 Cedar Lane ."'" .... u"':t<

~.. l ..~

03~s;.'''d; I rm'F~'er'·".ilU,*il

After each search a results screen will display:

• Page 6 September 27, 2011 e,

Goosle checkout .,.,

, Subl~tal: 11'500

"''''"0 .o? " •••_~, ..., ,•••~ ",.

Add a credit card to your CQ,~k Accoum lo contin<J~

Shop wnfid""tt, ....1h t;.~o~r. o,Bdovi s.~, lJjl ""'" .nd g.. 11IJ\, ._"'W'O" "" 'In'UlhQnz.d PU"""" ..."1,, "h'~P;"9" ,to,"" "'", ,", ""'~

"4d ..""",~,@m"c~mb9·,,_o'g~"'-'-~

'.''''

,----DiE! c;'] ~y ':r

I"'"n,h lJ I ~.:J ,;

• Page 7 September 27. 2011

At this point the user may view the image document It will have a large red X watermark through it to discourage theft. The payment processing can then take place.

As such, ACS GRM will perform the following services:

1. ACS GRM will create a dedicated server infrastructure (software and hardware) at an ACS GRM premise secure data center 10 support the number of documents and images that will be available to the GSA.

2. ACS GRM will pull off all documents and images in the date range of January 1, 2005 through current from the ACS GRM Hosted System to the dedicated server infrastructure.

3. This would involve approximately:

The errtire grantor/grantee index will be

Year Number of Documents Cost

$1200000

2005 234.351 2006 197,166 2007 2008

169,857 140 093

2009 136,904 2010 140 332 201' 150 000 est. 2012 75,000 est. January - June $ 6,000.00

$ 18,000,00TOTAL: 1,243,709 est.

available for searching in the Super Index. However, images will only be available from 2005 forward at firs\. When a search lerm results in a document that was recorded prior 10 2005, then the results will appear on the Super Index results page, with a link to the Landaccess.cOm legacy system and the corresponding liber and page number, prOViding a path for customers 10 retrieve and pay for images prior to 2005. The register 01 deeds envisions working with ACS on a plan to add images prior 10 2005 at a future dale.

The index information for these documents will be imported into a new SOL Server DBMS.

4. ACS GRM will OCR all of the documents in the January 1, 2005 through current date range and will save these files as searchable text files. ACS GRM will also set up day forward OCR processes for current work.

5. ACS GRM will prOVide the GSA for the POC. ACS GRM will provide GSA Model GB7007~ 1M-STD which has a capacity for up to 2 Million Documents.

6. ACS GRM will use the GSA to create Google indexes to alllext documents created by the OCR process.

7. ACS GRM will provide a link to the Super Index search for Macomb County.

8. ACS GRM will develop a payment interface for the Super Index search.

9. ACS GRM will assign a dedicated Project Leader and project team. The Project leader will direct and manage a team of individuals dedicated to the successful implementation of this project. Mark. Nicks has been appointed as the Projecf Leader.

• Page 8 September 27, 2011

10. ACS GRM will provide a Work Breakdown Structure consisting of the core set of implementation steps applicable to the Macomb County Super Index requirements. This working document will be reviewed in detail to ensure that all necessary tasks and duration of those tasks is captured and agreed upon.

11. ACS GRM will schedule regular meetings to review progress, discuss deliverables and make any necessary adjustments lo keep the project in scope and on schedule.

12. ACS GRM will be responsible for the design, development, management, training, acceptance, and support of all aspects of the Super Index search (hardware, software, etc.) POCo

ACS GRM will price these efforts as follows:

FUNCTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE PRICE

Server Infrastructure - Redundancy 2 $32,380.00 $64,760.00

Gooale Search Appliance - Loaner - 12 months 1 $5,750.00 $5,75000

Document OCR 1/1/2005 Current (est.) 1,243,709 $0.08 $99,496.72

ACS Professional Services - poe Development 1200 $12000 $144,000.00

GSA Specialists 80 $200.00 $16,000.00..

TOTAL: $330,006.72.

If you need more information please contact me at your convenience.

John P. Harvell Vice President & Chief Technology Officer

ACS GOVERNMENT RECORDS MANAGEMENT 8600 Harry Hines Blvd., Suite 300 Dallas, Texas 75235

Tel. No. 214-956-6308 Fax No. 214-902-5011 Cell No. 817-875-3712 Email: [email protected]

RECYCLABLE PAPER

lfa.

RESOLUTION NO.

FULL BOARD MEETING DATE: _

AGENDA ITEM _


RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF CUMMINGS MCCLOREY TO REPRESENT MACOMB COUNTY IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED MICHAEL GEORGE VS. MACOMB COUNTY, ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN THE MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

INTRODUCED BY CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE

Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Cummings McClorey to represent the County in the above lawsuit.

Michael George was an inmate at the Macomb County Jail. Mr. George was in jail pending the trial of first degree murder of his spouse for which he was convicted but sUbsequently was released from custody based upon a rUling by the Trial Judge. He is currently in the mist of a second trial in circuit court on the same charge.

Mr. George's lawsuit involves a medical malpractice claim against doctors who had treated him while he was incarcerated in the jail and outside the jail. His basic allegation is that they failed to diagnose a Vitamin B12 deficiency which lead to physical complications for him.

The law firm of Cummings & McClorey specializes in municipal law and defense of these types of claims. Mr. Tim Ferrand of that law firm will be assigned to handle this matter. Mr. Ferrand's office is located in Sterling Heights, Michigan and he has successfully defended the County on other similar actions and has a great deal of trial experience in handling these types of complaints.


FINANCE COMMITTEE - 10/18/11

RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM: _


RESOLUTION TO CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF CUMMINGS MCCLOREY TO REPRESENT MACOMB COUNTY IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED ROBERT TURNER, II VS. MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF DEPUTIES, ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

INTRODUCED BY CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITIEE

Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Cummings McClorey to represent the County in the above lawsuit.

Mr. Turner was arrested in June of 2008 and is claiming the deputies used excessive and severe force and the claim is that they beat, struck, hit and assaulted him. His claim is that he was severely brain injured and brain damaged. The arrest took place at the Quality Inn in Mt. Clemens when Mr. Turner was arrested for selling crack cocaine. According to the Police Report, Mr. Turner resisted attempts to arrest him and he also swallowed some of the crack cocaine which was in his possession.

When Mr. Turner was taken to the jail, he began to sweat profusely, his speech became incoherent and the officers observed what they believed to be a seizure. Medical staff was summoned to assist him and an ambulance was called and MedStar arrived and treated Mr. Turner.

The law firm of Cummings & McClorey specializes in municipal law and defense of these types of claims. Mr. Tim Ferrand of thai law firm will be assigned to handle this matter. Mr. Ferrand's office is located in Sterling Heights, Michigan and he has successfully defended the County on other similar actions and has a great deal of trial experience in handling these types of complaints.

COMMITIEEIMEETING DATE

FINANCE COMMITIEE - 10/18/11

RESOLUTION NO.

FULL BOARD MEETING DATE:

AGENDA ITEM: _


RESOLUTION TO CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF JOHNSON ROSATI LaBARGE, ASELTYNE & FIELD, PC TO REPRESENT MACOMB COUNTY IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED MICHAEL BIRD ADAMS VS. MACOMB COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN WAYNE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE

Pursuant to the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Johnson Rosati LaBarge Aseltyne & Field to represent the County in the above lawsuit.

Plaintiff in this case is a tow truck driver and he was called to Windsor to retrieve a vehicle that had broken down. When returning to the United States, the border patrol, based upon information they found in the LEIN showing a bench warrant for a Michael Adams and placed him in custody. The Sheriff's Department picked up Mr. Adams from the border patrol after he had been detained by them for approximately 5 hours The next morning, Mr. Adams was transported to Judge Viviano's Court where it was determined the wrong Michael Adams was in custody.

The law firm of Johnson Rosati LaBarge Aseltyne & Field specializes in municipal law and defense of these types of claims. Mr. Michael Rosati of that law firm will be assigned to handle this matter. Mr. Rosati's office is located in St. Clair Shores, Michigan and he has successfully defended the County on other similar actions.



RESOLUTION NO.


AGENDA ITEM: _


RESOLUTION TO: CONCUR IN THE APPOINTMENT OF THE LAW FIRM OF KITCH, DRUTCHAS, WAGNER, VALITUTTI & SHERBROOK TO REPRESENT THE COUNTY DEFENDANTS IN THE LITIGATION ENTITLED MOHSEN GHALEB, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF MARGUERITE GHALEB, DECEASED V MACOMB COUNTY, ET AL WHICH IS PENDING IN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

INTRODUCED BY: CHAIRPERSON DON BROWN, FINANCE COMMITTEE

Pursuant ta the provisions of the Charter, this office is asking the Board to concur in the appointment of the law firm of Kitch, Drutchas, Wagner, Valitutti & Sherbrook to represent the County and County Defendants In the above lawsuit.

The decedent who is being represented in this matter was a client of Macomb County Community Mental Health. On May 4. 2009, Ms. Ghaleb passed away from injuries she received when she jumped from the 14'h floor of her apartment complex.

The Plaintiff is suing the County of Macomb, Macomb County Community Mental Health, Macomb County Community Mental Health Board, First Resources & Treatment Southwest, as well as the psychiatrist under contract with Community Mental Health who provided services, the St. John Health System and Ascension Health. All who had treated the decedent in the past.

The Kitch Law Firm's principal office is located in Detroit and also has offices in the City of Mt. Clemens, was founded originally as a medical malpractice law firm and has branched out to other areas of the law but medical malpractice continues to be one of their chief fortes. The attorney who will be in charge of this file, Mr. Ralph Valitutti, is a principal in the law firm and has extensive trial experience in medical malpractice defense. Included within his medical malpractice expertise is psychiatric malpractice. The Kitch Law Firm therefore will be able to defend this case based upon not only the allegations of failure to provide proper treatment, but also in the area of governmental immunity because of their past experience in representing the County in other actions.



Finance Final Agenda 10-18-11 - Macomb Community Action

Documents

Transcript of Finance Final Agenda 10-18-11 - Macomb Community Action