Enfield Local Plan

Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) June 2021

www.enfield.gov.uk/enfieldlocalplan

2

Contents

1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3

2. Policy Context ............................................................................................................................ 5

3. The Enfield Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment Methodology ...... 7

4. Study Findings ......................................................................................................................... 15

5. Housing Trajectory ................................................................................................................... 20

6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 23

Appendices .............................................................................................................................. 25

Appendix A: Glossary ............................................................................................................... 26

Appendix B: LB Enfield sources reviewed in relation to PPG guidance .................................. 28

Appendix C: Detailed methodology for steps 1-6 of site assessment (Stage 2)...................... 31

Appendix D: Detailed Housing Typology Density Case Studies .............................................. 40

Appendix E: Full Assessment of potential sites ....................................................................... 41

Appendix F: Maps of assessed sites ....................................................................................... 42

Appendix G: List of rejected sites ............................................................................................ 43

Appendix H: Sites Excluded due to being 100% within Level 1 constraints .......................... 118

Appendix I: Sites Assessed as being “not developable within the 15 year plan period” ....... 119

3

1. Introduction

1.1 This report sets out the Council’s Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA). This assessment updates the Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) published in December 2020 and incorporates the latest call for sites which was open from 1 February to 28 February 2021. The assessment also incorporates employment sites and other non-residential uses, drawing on previous and existing work on Employment Land Reviews as well as land promoted for non-residential uses. The HELAA has been prepared from a base date of 1st April 2016.

1.2 The assessment is an important source of evidence to inform the Regulation 18 issues and option consultation document1. It will be used to support decision-making and does not pre-judge the strategic approach that the Enfield Local Plan will eventually take.

1.3 The Enfield HELAA also provides more up to date and locally specific evidence to complement the London Plan Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (2017). It is based on the best information reasonably available at the time of writing and using the professional judgement of those involved.

Purpose of the HELAA

1.4 The HELAA is a technical exercise to determine the quantity and suitability of land potentially available for housing development. The purpose of the HELAA is to identify future supply of land which is suitable, available and achievable for housing and economic uses over the local plan period.

1.5 It is a required part of the evidence base needed for the preparation of a Local Plan2. Paragraph 73 of the NPPF requires Local Plans to identify a supply of specific, deliverable sites for years one to five of the plan period (with an additional buffer of 5% or 20%, moved forward from later in the plan period), and specific sites or ‘broad locations’ for years 6 to 10, and if possible for years 11- 15.

1.6 The HELAA forms part of the evidence base for the Local Plan (ELP). It provides a factual survey of potential housing and economic sites that will inform how allocated sites are chosen in the ELP. The survey of sites and the criteria used to assess them also informs the calculation of housing supply in the annual Five-Year Housing Land Supply reports (5YHLS).

1.7 Enfield’s HELAA will inform the following:

• Local Plan site allocations;

• Infrastructure planning;

• Five-Year Housing Land Supply calculations;

• Housing trajectory; and

• Enfield’s Brownfield Land Register.

1.8 The HELAA lists and maps sites within Enfield that may have potential for housing development. Most of the sites are submissions from landowners and developers for possible future development potential. It is important to note that the sites in the HELAA are NOT allocated for development. It is the role of the assessment to provide information on the range of sites which are available to meet need, but it is for the development plan itself to determine which of those sites are the most suitable to meet those needs. The inclusion of sites within the HELAA also does not preclude them from being developed for alternative suitable uses. The exclusion of sites from the HELAA (either because they have not been identified or have been assessed and

1 Consultation from 21 June to 13 September 2021 2 NPPF paragraph 159

4

discounted) does not preclude the possibility of planning consent being granted in the future. The decisions regarding which sites will be allocated will be made in the Local Plan documents that will be subject to full public consultation before any decision is made.

1.9 Furthermore, where land is found deliverable (or developable) in the HELAA it does not indicate it should be granted planning permission or will be selected for Local Plan site allocation. The HELAA includes estimates of housing and economic land uses on individual sites. These are not based on detailed designs so should not be assumed as acceptable for the purposes of development management decisions and should not prejudice any decision that may be made on the site at a later date.

1.10 The HELAA will form a critical part of the evidence base for the future of the Local Plan. It will be updated on an annual basis as further sites may be submitted after the initial call for sites period has ended.

Need for the Update

1.11 An update to the SHLAA was needed to:

• Identify new potential sites in the period to 31 March 2021 (including those that have been granted planning permission);

• Publish sites submitted to the Council during the most recent ‘Call for Sites’;

• Consider economic land alongside housing land for the period 2019/20 to 38/39; and

• Inform the Regulation 18 draft Enfield Local Plan.

1.12 The HELAA will show an indicative land supply for the whole plan period to 2038/39.

Structure of the Report

1.13 This report presents the findings of the HELAA and the methodology used to arrive at these findings. The report complies with the Planning Practice Guidance.

1.14 Section 3 of this report describes the policy context for the HELAA. Section 4 outlines the methodology used to carry out Enfield’s HELAA. Section 5 sets out the key findings. Section 6 sets out the housing trajectory and Section 7 concludes on the capacity of deliverable and developable sites available to meet the Borough’s housing requirement.

1.15 This report is supplemented by a number of technical appendices which provide detailed data on individual sites.

5

2. Policy Context

National

2.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)3, states that local planning authorities should prepare a strategic housing land availability assessment to ‘identify a sufficient supply and mix of sites, taking into account their availability, suitability and likely economic viability’.

2.2 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG)4 states that the HELAA should:

• identify sites and broad locations with potential for development;

• assess their development potential; and

• assess their suitability for development and the likelihood of development coming forward (the availability and achievability).

2.3 This approach ensures that all land is assessed together as part of plan preparation to identify which sites or broad locations are the most suitable and deliverable for a particular use.

2.4 The NPPF states that at the point of adoption of the relevant Local Plan, there should be:

• A supply of specific, deliverable sites for years one to five of the plan period; and

• Specific, developable sites or broad locations for growth, for years 6-10 and, where possible, for years 11-15 of the plan.

2.5 To be considered developable, sites should be in a suitable location for housing and economic development, and there should be a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for, and could be, viably developed at the point envisaged.

The London Plan

2.6 The London Plan was formally adopted in March 2021. The London Plan housing target is based on the 2017 London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). This calculated a capacity of 1,246 homes per annum for Enfield over the 10-year period 2019/20 to 2028/29.

Maintaining a Five-Year Supply of Deliverable Sites

2.7 The findings of the HELAA should be considered alongside the borough’s housing target in order to determine the five-year supply of developable sites. An assessment of the borough’s 5 -year housing land supply is published annually as part of annual monitoring and can be viewed at, or downloaded from: https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/monitoring/

Local Context

2.8 Work has now commenced on a new Local Plan for Enfield. The new Local Plan will look to 2039 and aims to identify additional land for new housing and economic development purposes. Consultation on a Regulation 18 Plan commenced in June 2021. The Regulation 18 Issues and options Plan will take account of the level of housing capacity identified through the Mayor’s London SHLAA 2017 and the housing need identified in the Enfield Local Housing Need Assessment (LHNA)5.

2.9 An important role of the HELAA is to enable the assessment of whether there is a 5-year supply of deliverable housing and economic land. The NPPF requires a continuous 5-year supply of land to be maintained which means that the assessment needs to be updated on an annual basis.

3 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2 4 https://www.gov.uk/guidance/housing-and-economic-land-availability-assessment 5 https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/evidence-base/

6

2.10 This HELAA includes information collected in previous Call for Sites exercises which was open from 5 December 2018 until 28 February 2019 and has informed the Enfield SHLAA, 2020. A further call for small sites was undertaken on 1st February until 26 February 2021. Information relating to planning permissions granted is correct as of, and up to, the 31 March 2021. Our latest analysis of housing completions include assessment of the homes completed in 2019/20. Any housing delivery figures beyond 2019/20 are projected.

2.11 The purpose of the HELAA is to identify a future supply of land which is suitable, available and achievable for housing and economic uses over the plan period. The HELAA will follow the methodology as set out in national planning guidance.

2.12 The HELAA forms part of a wider evidence base. Its role is to be used in conjunction and alongside other evidence, for example, employment land review, strategic flood risk assessments and sequential tests, strategic housing market assessments, area specific regeneration objectives and spatial priorities as set out in the emerging Enfield Local Plan. At the planning application stage, any evidence from the HELAA should be considered alongside all these other factors and information gathered during pre-application discussions.

2.13 The assessment is an important source of evidence to inform the Enfield Regulation 18 ‘Main Issues and Preferred Approaches’ Consultation (2021). It will be used to support decision-making and does not pre-judge the strategic approach that the Enfield Local Plan will eventually take. The HELAA does not allocate land for housing or economic development and does not make policy decisions on which sites should be developed.

2.14 Not all the sites identified in the HELAA as being ‘developable’ for housing or economic uses will necessarily be allocated in the Enfield Local Plan. Some will be needed for other types of development such as burial space, waste management and community facilities and others will be safeguarded as open space.

7

3. The Enfield Strategic Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment Methodology

Planning Practice Guidance

3.1 The methodology set out in National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) has been followed. The method comprises the following five stages:

• Stage 1 - Identification of sites and broad locations with potential for development

• Stage 2 - Assessing their development potential including site suitability, availability and achievability

• Stage 3 – Assessing potential for windfall sites

• Stage 4 – Reviewing the assessment

• Stage 5 – Assessing the core outputs to inform the evidence base for the Local Plan.

3.2 The Enfield HELAA methodology aligns with the National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) methodology and builds upon the work done for the London SHLAA. It breaks the process into five broad stages and summarises these using the flowchart set out in Figure 1 below. We have adopted this broad methodology and the following sections describe how each stage of the Enfield Assessment will be undertaken.

Divergence from London SHLAA methodology

3.3 The Government’s national Planning Practice Guidance advises that Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment methodology should be followed in preparing a HELAA. It breaks the process into five broad stages and summarises these using the flowchart set out in figure 1. We have adopted this broad methodology and the following sections describe how each stage of the Enfield Assessment has been undertaken. The differences with the planning practice guidance and the London SHLAA methodology are explained below.

3.4 Firstly, the London SHLAA study uses a bespoke system which includes assessing housing potential on large sites using a ‘constraints model,’ which “establishes probability based” housing capacity estimates for each site based on the number and severity of planning policy, environmental and delivery constraints affecting it.” This differs from the guidance set out within the PPG.

3.5 Secondly, the size threshold varies from the approach taken by the London Plan SHLAA (2017) which estimated capacity on sites above 0.25ha. Due to the high proportion of small sites that come forward in the borough the LB Enfield SHLAA considered any sites which is greater than 0.05ha or with potential to deliver 5 homes. For economic development purposes the estimated site capacity was for 0.25ha for industrial / logistics uses or 250sqm for office uses.

3.6 Thirdly, within the London Plan SHLAA methodology housing delivery potential on sites smaller than 0.25ha was estimated through a modelling exercise, where average annual trends in housing completions were adjusted to take into account the expected impact of planning policy changes in the draft London Plan. Our approach to estimating windfall allowance is set out under Stage 3.

3.7 Finally, the primary difference to the planning practice guidance methodology is that the SHLAA only considered land available to meet housing need and did not consider land available for economic purposes.

Consultation on the methodology

3.8 The draft SHLAA methodology was consulted on in October 2020. A consultation statement summarising the response received and the amendments made in response to these has been published and is available to view here: https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/evidence-base/. The approach to incorporation and consideration of economic land follows a similar approach with minor variations in respect of the site size threshold used. It also does not consider Stage 3 (Windfall assessment) as the NPPF and NPPG indicates this is only appropriate for

8

housing sites. It was not considered necessary to revisit the methodology for the purposes of introducing an assessment of economic land availability, as the broad principles remain the same.

Figure 1 Methodology Flow Chart6

6 Paragraph: 005 Reference ID: 3-005-20190722

9

Planning Practice Guidance Methodology Overview

Stage 1 - Identification of sites and broad locations What geographical area does the assessment cover?

3.9 The National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) advises that the area selected for the assessment should be the plan-making area7. It goes on to add that assessment needs to be undertaken and regularly reviewed working with other LPAs in the relevant housing market area (HMA) or functional economic area (FEMA).

3.10 The Council’s Strategic Housing Market Assessment (2015) indicates that London has always been considered as a single market area although within it there are a range of sub-markets. The data underpinning the SHMA suggests that Enfield can be considered as a single local market area for housing.

3.11 Employment Land Reviews8 are conducted with reference to the Functional Economic Market Area (FEMA), which for Enfield currently consists of an area comprising the following local authorities: Barnet. Brent, Broxbourne, East Herts, Epping Forest, Haringey, Harlow, Hertsmere, Newham, Redbridge, Uttlesford, Waltham Forest and Welwyn Hatfield.9 Enfield has commenced duty to cooperate discussions with FEMA authorities. In particular, the study identified two authorities with potential or limited potential for ‘substitution’ in line with Policy E7 of the London Plan. LB Enfield have approached FEMA authorities to explore the potential provision of Enfield’s identified employment needs outside the borough boundaries. But these discussions have indicated that this will not be possible. Discussions with authorities will be ongoing through the plan-making process. However, at this stage it is not considered appropriate to assess the availability of economic land beyond the borough boundaries.

3.12 Therefore, the HELAA covers the geographical area of Enfield borough.

What size threshold was considered?

3.13 The NPPG states that assessments should consider all sites capable of delivering 5 or more dwellings, however where appropriate, alternative site size thresholds can be considered.

3.14 For housing land the HELAA uses a size threshold of 0.05ha or those with potential to deliver 5 homes, on the grounds that they are likely to make an important contribution to overall supply.

3.15 For economic land a site threshold of 0.25ha for industrial/logistics uses or 250m2 of floorspace for office uses, was included to reflect the relatively small office market in Enfield primarily dominated by smaller units with over half (58.5%) being under 250sqm in size10.

3.16 The assessment of the availability of land for economic uses covers those uses within Part B and Parts E(g)(i), E(g)(ii) and E(g)(iii) of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987, including offices, research and development premises, light and general industry, and places for storage and distribution.

How were sites identified?

3.17 As the purpose of the HELAA is to provide evidence for future plan making, we have taken a proactive approach in identifying as wide a range of sites and broad locations for development, and the NPPG advises that authorities should not just rely on sites already known to them and should seek to identify new opportunities through land availability assessments. In accordance with the national planning practice guidance, assessments have been made of different site sizes

7 Paragraph: 006 Reference ID: 3-006-20190722 8 Enfield Employment Land Review, 2018 9 Enfield FEMA Study, 2020 https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/fema-study-2020-planning.pdf 10 Enfield Employment Land Review, 2018

10

from small-scale sites to opportunities for large-scale developments such as extensions to urban areas and/or villages and new settlements where appropriate.

3.18 The National Planning Practice Guidance11 sets out what types of sites and sources of data should be used. It indicates that plan-makers should consider all available types of sites and sources of data and includes a list of those which might be particularly relevant. The full list of these is set out in Appendix B.

3.19 There was inevitably a degree of overlap within and between all sources of supply considered. It was therefore important to ‘cleanse’ the data to ensure that each site has a correct, unique and identifiable site boundary and that no sites are double counted, in part or as a whole. There were also a number of sites where insufficient information was provided in order to assess the sites through the HELAA methodology and it was therefore not possible to include these.

3.20 All new sites identified during the relevant monitoring period will be assessed against the methodology. In addition, all sites previously considered, including those that were previously scoped out of the study, will be ‘re-visited’ to ensure that assumptions made were correct and / or that circumstances have not changed in future iterations. As such, any information on new sites which is received outside of this ‘formal’ call for sites period will not be disregarded - the details will be kept on file and reviewed as part of the next update of the HELAA

3.21 A desktop review of existing information will be carried out by the Council to identify potential sites for development. All the sites identified in both the desktop review and ‘Call for Sites’ will be included in a comprehensive list of sites, and information about them will be recorded in the HELAA database. Table 1 lists sources of potential sites.

Table 1 Sources of potential sites

Source of data

Enfield Planning Applications – including extant approved applications, refused applications and those where construction has already commenced on site. This will also include schemes consented under permitted development rights.

The returns from Enfield’s Call for Sites and Call for Small Sites (including additional consultation with relevant LBE stakeholders regarding Council estates with capacity for intensification and Council owned land either surplus or likely to become surplus over Enfield Local Plan period)

Public sector land, including that owned by GLA and TfL, either surplus or likely to become surplus over Enfield Local Plan period, in addition to that identified through the Call for Sites (identified through direct consultation with ‘GLA family’)

Sites with development briefs and/or developer masterplans

London SHLAA 2017

Existing Development Plan Allocations not yet completed

The GLA’s London Development Database (LDD)

Enfield Brownfield Land Register

Sites identified through adopted or emerging Neighbourhood Plans in Enfield

Stage 2: Site / Broad location Assessment

3.22 Having collated all sites identified from all the various sources outlined above the next step was to undertake an initial sift to exclude sites that are not considered to have any reasonable development potential, having regard to national and local policies and designations. Sites lying wholly within the constraints identified in Table 2 below were excluded.

11 Paragraph: 011 Reference ID: 3-011-20190722

11

Table 2: Constraints on basis of which sites to be excluded

Level 1 – Sites to be excluded

• Sites within the functional floodplain (Flood Zone 3b)

• Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

• Sites of special scientific interest (SSSI)

• Special Protection Area (SPA)

• Ramsar sites

• National Nature Reserves (NNR)

• Ancient Woodland

• Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG)

• Grade 1 and 2 agricultural land

3.23 In accordance with the national planning practice guidance12, sites have been assessed to determine their suitability, availability and achievability within the assessment period (up until 2038/39), including whether the site is economically viable.

3.24 The methodology utilises six steps in order to achieve this, as outlined in table 4 below. Further detail on steps of the site assessment are included within Appendix C.

Table 3: Stages of Site Assessment

Step 1: Site Surveys Assemble the key information for each selected site

Step 2: Assessing availability Consideration of factors such as site ownership, developer/owners’ intensions etc.

Step 3: Assessing suitability Consideration of primary development constraints, including spatial and environmental indicators.

Step 4: Assessing achievability Consideration of known delivery issues e.g. market costs, etc.

Step 5: Finalising assessment outcome Based on the first 4 steps, summarising the deliverability of the sites and likely timescales

Step 6: Site capacity (where appropriate) Assessing site capacity using up to date evidence or if this is not available, a formula-based approach.

3.25 This process led to sites being classified as follows:

• Sites classified as “deliverable” or “developable” may be expected to be developed within the Plan period.

• Sites classified as “potentially developable” comprise a basket of sites from which some might be deemed developable following further consideration through the local plan process.

• Sites classified as “not developable within the Plan period” cannot realistically be expected to be developed in the foreseeable future.

12 Paragraph: 001 Reference ID: 3-001-20190722

12

Stage 3: Determining Windfall assessment (where justified)

3.26 This section summarises the methodology and approach used to estimate projected housing capacity on small windfall sites and sets out the findings of this assessment.

3.27 The NPPG13 states that in HELAAs “Plan-makers will need to assess a range of different site sizes from small-scale sites to opportunities for large-scale developments such as village and town extensions and new settlements where appropriate. It may be appropriate to consider all sites and broad locations capable of delivering 5 or more dwellings, or economic development on sites of 0.25 hectares (or 500 square metres of floor space) and above”.

3.28 Paragraph 70 of the NPPF and Planning Practice Guidance14 also state that ‘windfall’ assumptions for the projected rate of housing delivery on unidentified sites can be included in assessments of potential housing supply in years 6-15, providing there is ‘compelling evidence’ that such sites have consistently become available in the area and will continue to provide a reliable source. Any allowance should be realistic and have regard to both historic windfall delivery rates and expected future trends.

3.29 A significant level of housing development has historically come forward from small housing schemes of under five dwellings in Enfield, which falls below the defined HELAA site size assessment threshold. In line with paragraph 70 of the NPPF the small sites will exclude development on residential gardens, allocated sites and rural exception sites. Based on assumptions as set out in the GLA SHLAA (2017) and London Development Database completions data for Enfield over a ten year period (FY2009/10 – 2018/19), the borough has an average annual windfall delivery of 110 homes from smaller housing schemes delivering less than five net additional homes which represented 23% of all net additional housing completions during that period.

Figure 2: Annual net scheme level completions (2009/10 to 2018/19) – Source: London Development Database

3.30 The windfall allowance of 110 homes has therefore been projected for smaller developments falling below the defined HELAA threshold of 5 dwellings.

3.31 The future annual windfall allowance to be included in the Council’s Housing Trajectory will be determined by applying a trend-based approach based on an analysis of completions over a period of 10 years. A windfall allowance will be made from year 6 onwards in the housing trajectory. This is to avoid double counting against existing unimplemented planning permissions, which are normally valid for 3 years and therefore likely to be completed within 5 years from the date of the planning permission. Therefore, a windfall allowance of 1,540 homes will be included until 2038/39.

13 Paragraph: 009 Reference ID: 3-009-20190722 14 Paragraph 023 Reference ID: 3-023-20190722

159 131 89 56 82 91 111 100 131 154

125

326

217

499 444309

567

788

25483

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018

Completions on sites of 1-4 dwellings (net)Completions on sites of 5+ dwellings (net)

13

3.32 Comparisons of actual development over the next fifteen years with the results of this assessment will usefully inform future economic land availability assessments.

Stage 4: Assessment Review

3.33 Stage four of the assessment methodology set out in the NPPG includes a review of the development needs of the borough. The assessment forms the basis for considering which sites may be suitable for allocation in the borough in the emerging Local Plan and will provide evidence as to whether the housing and economic needs can be met on the sites available and whether there are likely to be any issues with the delivery phasing of these development types.

Housing Need

3.34 Determining housing need in this context is not an easy task and especially in Enfield. The London Plan 2021 sets out a housing target for the borough of 1,246 homes per annum. This target is based on site capacity assessments. The Local Housing Needs Assessment (November 2020) sets out the objectively assessed need requirement for the plan at 1,744 dwellings per annum, based on the London Plan target of 1,246. This would equate to an overall need of 34,880 homes over a 20-year plan period.

3.35 Enfield’s current assessment of uncapped need based on the latest Standard Methodology set out in the NPPG is 4,397 dwellings per annum. Over a 15-year plan period this would amount to 65,955 net new dwellings. The Standard Methodology also recommends a 40% cap is applied to housing targets if they were adopted in the previous five years. Since the publication of the London Plan 2021 the estimated capped housing need for Enfield would be 2,355 homes a year or 35,325 over a 15-year period. However, the Government has now made it clear that the responsibility for setting housing targets in London rests with the Mayor of London therefore we will be basing our housing assessments against the London Plan target and will apply the methodology set out in the London Plan when considering our housing targets beyond 2028/29.

3.36 The development potential of all identified sites was collated to produce an indicative housing trajectory setting out how much housing development could potentially be provided at given points in the future through the HELAA.

Economic Land Need

3.37 The Enfield Employment Land Review 2018 study provides a forecast for the demand for economic land as follows:

• Demand for 32,200 m2 of office floorspace up to 2036. This equates to a demand for 37,030 m2 up to 2039.

• Demand for 48.6ha (218,700 m2) for industry and logistics up to 2039. This equates to demand for 56ha (251,505 m2) up to 2039.

3.38 This therefore allows a comparison between the forecast demand and potential supply provided by the HELAA.

3.39 For economic land, the total likely development over time was compared to the demand for economic uses set out in the Borough’s Employment Land Review Study.

Stage 5: Final Evidence Base

3.40 Stage five of the land availability assessment methodology set out in the planning practice guidance is the production of the final evidence base report including outcome. This report represents Stage 5.

3.41 A detailed list of sites was produced, cross-referenced to maps of the site boundaries, with details of the assessment of each site, and projected delivery of housing or economic uses over time and contains the core outputs defined in the NPPG, namely:

14

• A list of excluded sites with clearly evidenced and justified reasons;

• A list of all sites or broad locations considered, cross-referenced to their locations on maps;

• An assessment of each site or broad location, in terms of its suitability for development, availability and achievability (including whether the site/broad location is viable) to determine whether a site is realistically expected to be developed and when;

• An assessment of the potential type and quantity of development that could be delivered on each site/broad location, including a reasonable estimate of build out rates, setting out how any barriers to delivery could be overcome and when; and

• An indicative housing trajectory of anticipated development and consideration of associated risks.

3.42 The assessment looks to indicate the broad capacity for housing and economic uses across all potential sites and does not allocate particular sites for particular forms of development.

15

4. Study Findings

4.1 A total of 1,684 potential sites were assessed as set out in the HELAA methodology. Some sites were submitted by multiple interested parties or promoted for different options for proposed land uses (e.g. housing, employment and mixed use)15.

Excluded sites

4.2 The HELAA has attempted to identify a wide range of possible sites and broad locations for consideration. Sites which have particular policy constraints have been included to test the appropriateness of previously defined constraints.

4.3 Before undertaking the full assessment, a data cleanse was undertaken. There were 1,024 discounted sites identified for a range of reasons including where sites were overlapping with other submissions (this was the case for many sites submitted by third parties), were beneath the 0.05ha size threshold, had already been developed and therefore could no longer be considered available, or where adequate information had not been provided (e.g. a red line boundary identifying the site), amongst other factors. They are classed as ‘rejected sites’ and were not taken into the next stages of the assessment. The full list of these rejected sites is set out in Appendix G.

4.4 The ‘excluded’ sites are currently constrained for housing or economic uses either because of physical or planning policy restrictions, or are otherwise considered unsuitable, unavailable or unachievable. Of the 660 remaining sites assessed, stage 1 of the methodology identified 7 sites which were affected by significant constraints (in all instances these were located within Flood Risk Zone 3) and which were therefore excluded from further analysis. The full list of these sites is set out in Appendix H.

4.5 Of the remaining 653 sites assessed further, 613 sites were assessed for housing or housing-led mixed use development; 32 sites for employment uses; and 8 sites were assessed for other uses such as nature recovery, leisure, recreation and sporting uses, or burial needs.

4.6 A total of 32 were assessed as being ‘not developable within the 15 year plan period’ (31 proposed for housing/house-led mixed use development and 1 proposed for employment uses). There are a range of reasons for this assessment outcome– some have been completed since the data was collected so are no longer available, some are no longer available/suitable for housing or economic uses based on more recent evidence (this mainly applies to sites from GLA’s 2017 SHLAA which carried forward sites from 2013), some were not submitted for consideration for housing or economic development through the call for sites. The full list of these sites is included within Appendix I.

4.7 It should be noted that just because a site appears within the excluded sites list this does not preclude it from coming forward in the future if it is considered suitable at that time. For some of the sites, the term “constrained” mainly relates to the sites’ current suitability for housing rather than deliverability and there may be some potential for the site to come forward in the future if circumstances were to change. This is especially the case for those sites which would need to be assessed more fully in the context of a strategic review of employment land. Other sites may have potential but are not currently considered available. Some, however, are likely to remain unsuitable, for example if they are significantly affected by Flood Zone 3b or are physically inaccessible.

15 This HELAA is an update to the Enfield SHLAA (2020) and includes reconsideration of all the sites

assessed in the SHLAA. Therefore, the number of sites assessed or excluded also include those sites that were assessed as part of SHLAA.

16

Potential Land Supply

4.8 The deliverable, developable potentially developable sites within the HELAA are split into different categories depending on their planning status:

• Deliverable (comprising Sites under construction (remaining net capacity as at 31 March 2021); and Sites with extant residential planning permission as at 31 March 2021);

• Developable (including Housing allocations within the Adopted Local Plan; Lapsed and Stalled housing sites with revised capacity estimates; as well as sites submitted through call for sites with no obvious availability, suitability or achievability constraints to overcome); and

• Potentially developable sites (sites which are subject to issues to be resolved with respect to availability, cannot currently be deemed suitable – primarily due to planning policy constraints, or those for which further evidence is required to demonstrate achievability).

4.9 All sites and broad locations are placed within one of the above categories and the assessment then determines how many homes are likely to be delivered on each site (if any) and when. This calculation then informs the housing trajectory to determine short- and long-term housing potential across the borough.

Housing Land Supply

4.10 Of the 613 sites assessed for housing or housing-led mixed use, 316 were assessed as being deliverable, 100 as developable, 167 as potentially developable and 30 sites were classed as being not developable.

4.11 Table 4 sets out the potential HELAA housing site capacity up to 2038/39 from the sites considered to be deliverable, developable, or potentially developable.

Table 4: HELAA Housing Supply Summary

HELAA category Total additions 2020/21-2024/25

Total additions 2025/26-2029/30

Total additions 2031/32-2038/39

Total additions All periods

Deliverable 5,568 1,936 1,479 8,983

Developable 0 6,284 1,969 8,253

Potentially Developable

0 9,564 12,383 21,947

Current windfall allowance

0 550 990 1,540

Total 5,568 18,334 16,821 40,723

Total excluding ‘potentially developable

5,568 8,770 4,438 18,776

Housing Capacity from ‘Potentially Developable’ sites

4.12 Table 5 identifies the capacity from the ‘potentially developable’ sites, including those with significant planning policy constraints, if the identified in-principle constraints could be removed. This shows that there could be 21,947 dwellings delivered on 167 sites. These figures show that the theoretical housing capacity from currently constrained sites is significant and includes a

17

large potential capacity of 12,498 dwellings on 48 sites within, or partially within, Green Belt / Metropolitan Open Land, and 3,828 dwellings on 15 sites within Strategic Industrial Land and Locally Significant Industrial Sites.

4.13 However, it must be borne in mind that the capacity is based only on a rough estimate using an appropriate typology density. For larger strategic sites this is multiplied by the net developable area of the site (80% of the total site area) to account for the necessary associated infrastructure that would be required. If any of these sites were to be developed, the true capacity would likely reflect the fact that not all the land would be developed or be physically suitable for housing, particularly for SIL or Green Belt sites. For particularly large sites where additional social infrastructure may be required it has been assumed that only 70% of the site would be deliverable for housing.

4.14 Whilst some of the sites may come forward as “windfalls” over future plan periods or further assessment may determine that they could be suitable, most are likely to remain in their current use and/or will continue to be regarded as unsuitable for housing and only a proportion of this capacity will be achieved.

Table 5 Estimated capacity of ‘potentially developable’ sites

Potentially Suitable Site Category

Estimated Housing Capacity

Notes

Total estimated potentially developable supply

21,947

A large component of ‘potentially developable’ sites were submitted by a third party (Enfield Road Watch and CPRE joint submission) where availability is unknown. If availability for these could be determined these could be considered developable. Many others were covered by planning policy constraints. A breakdown of estimated capacity on land covered by planning policy constraints is below.

Total estimated potentially developable sites within Green Belt/Metropolitan Open Land

12,498

Total estimated potentially developable sites within SIL or LSIS

3,828

Total estimated potentially developable sites within Green Belt + SIL

15,326

Total estimated potentially developable supply without GB/SIL constraints

6,621

This figure is the total estimated capacity of all sites which do not have Green Belt or SIL policy constraints. A large component of ‘potentially developable’ sites were submitted by a third party (Enfield Road Watch and CPRE joint submission) where availability is unknown. If availability for these could be determined these could be considered developable.

4.15 The housing land supply position set out in the HELAA is indicative. It is based on assumptions made regarding the developable area, capacity, density and constraints of sites using the information available at the time of assessment. This includes information and technical studies submitted by developers and landowners, technical studies by the Council, and any other information considered relevant. When brought forward, the final number, type, and mix of dwellings will be determined through the planning application process.

18

4.16 Due to the indicative nature of the site supply, the Council has considered whether it would be appropriate to assume that all of the identified HELAA sites will a) come forward, and b) come forward in the anticipated manner over the plan period.

4.17 Table 5 sets out the number of deliverable and developable housing units in each of these categories and places them in five-year time periods, up to 2039. The column headed “Total additions 2020-2025” represents the five-year housing land supply. “Potential” sites included in this are those which have yet to receive permission as of 31 March 2021 but where we are confident, they will be delivered within five years e.g. they have been sold to a developer and/or a planning application has been submitted or is being prepared.

4.18 The HELAA identifies 17,236 homes from deliverable and developable sites between 2020/21 and 2038/39. The study also identifies 21,947 homes from ‘potentially developable’ sites.

4.19 The assessment of potential housing supply is not a forecast or prediction; it is an assessment based on capacity within identified sites and an allowance for windfall, measured against an annual housing requirement figure over various timeframes.

4.20 The assessment of housing capacities for sites has meant that all potential uses for sites have been investigated. The housing capacities for the sites considered suitable for housing or a mix of housing and other uses will inform the council’s inputs to the next London SHLAA.

4.21 The findings of the HELAA should be considered alongside the borough’s housing target in order to determine the five-year supply of developable sites. An assessment of the borough’s 5 year housing land supply is published annually as part of annual monitoring and can be viewed at, or downloaded from: https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/monitoring/

Employment Land Supply

4.22 The London Plan has a strong focus on maximising the capacity of designated industrial sites in London to meet economic needs. The assessment of current economic land supply and future demand is derived from the Enfield 2018 Employment Land Review (ELR). The remit of the ELR was to assess only sites that were occupied by office, industrial and distribution / warehousing development (Use Classes E(g)(i), E(g)(ii) and E(g)(iii) B2 and B8). Therefore, only these uses are classed as economic development for the purposes of the HELAA.

4.23 The Enfield Employment Land Review study (2018) identifies a current total of 451.5ha of Industrial land in Enfield, comprising 326.2ha of occupied ‘core’ industrial land, and 125.3ha of ‘wider’ industrial land.

4.24 The ELR Study provides a forecast demand for economic land to allow comparison between the forecast demand and potential supply provided by the HELAA. AECOM concluded that Enfield requires 48.6ha of net additional industrial (and warehousing) land. This is for the period up to 2036, which was the former proposed plan period. To provide an estimate of need for the new plan period the Council has ‘rolled forward’ the AECOM estimate – so increasing need for the period up to 2039 to 56ha (251,505m2) for industrial uses. The estimates of future industrial land /floorspace broadly aligned with the GLA view as set out in the GLA Industrial Land Benchmarks study.

4.25 For sites with potential as employment-led site allocations, the indicative capacity has been assessed by applying a plot ratio of 65%, in line with London Plan guidance16.

4.26 A total of 32 sites were assessed for economic uses.

4.27 7 sites were identified that had extant consent for employment uses but had yet to be implemented. It is anticipated these will deliver 12,986 sqm of industry/logistics floorspace and 6,552 sqm office floorspace.

16 London Plan, p. 179.

19

4.28 The remaining 25 sites were submitted through the borough’s call for sites. Of these 14 sites in the urban area were identified as having potential for employment use or mixed-use with an employment component with an estimated capacity of 132,959sqm (30ha) of floorspace. At present, many of the sites are either in retail use and/or industrial sites wanting to introduce housing as part of mixed-use proposals. A further 11 sites located within the Green Belt were identified as having potential for employment use or mixed-use with an employment component with an employment component with an estimated capacity of 223,550sqm (51ha) of floorspace.

4.29 The 132,959 sqm industrial/logistics land supply identified within the urban area falls short of the 251,505 sqm (55ha) of forecast demand as identified within the ELR. This leaves a shortfall of roughly half of the floorspace needed for industry and logistics.

20

5. Housing Trajectory

5.1 This section of the report provides some information on dwelling completions in recent years and examines the envisaged completion rates up to 2038/39.

5.2 Following consultation, the Ministry of Housing and Local Government (MHCLG) introduced a revised standard methodology for calculating local housing need in 2020. Enfield’s current local housing need based on this standard methodology is 4,397 new homes per year. The Publication London Plan (2021) set a housing requirement for Enfield of 1,246 new homes per year. This requirement represents a significant increase on the previous housing requirement of 798 homes per year set out in the current Local Plan.

5.3 The following section presents Enfield’s current five year and post five-year housing land supply trajectory, against the Publication London Plan target of 1,246 dwellings per annum.

5.4 The housing trajectories take account of all sites identified in the housing land supply set out in the HELAA for years 0-5 and beyond and shows the net additional dwellings which are expected over this time period.

Recent completions

5.5 Table 6 and Figure 3 below provide information on the number of housing completions since 2015/16. This is fully set out within the Authorities Monitoring Report, available at: https://new.enfield.gov.uk/services/planning/monitoring/

Table 6: Housing Completions 2015/16 to 2019/20

Year Completed (Net) Variance (against housing requirement)

2015/16 660 -99

2016/17 954 156

2017/18 389 -409

2018/19 496 -302

2019/20 429 -817

21

Housing Trajectory

Figure 3 Housing Trajectory

5.6 Compared to past completions, the above trajectory illustrates that there is expected to be an increase in the annual average completion rate over the next five years (2020/21 to 2024/25) with 5,568 net completions over this period (taking account of expected clearance). This equates to an annual average of 1,113 dwellings over this period and reflects the assumed delivery of sites that are either currently under construction or have an extant planning permission, together with other identified sites that are expected to come forward in the short term.

5.7 The Housing Trajectory in Figure 3.shows the number of homes identified through the HELAA process over the Local Plan period to 2039, including the five-year housing land supply. It also provides information on the number of housing completions between 2015/16 and 2019/20. The housing trajectory shown is illustrative only. We expect the delivery of homes to fluctuate on a yearly basis and expect delivery to increase as we start implementing the planning polices once they are applied to housing proposals. The housing trajectory will be refined further, working on conjunction with developers and landowners who are promoting their sites through the call for sites process.

Post Five-Year Supply

5.8 The trajectory indicates that a further 13,207 dwellings are expected to be delivered beyond the next five years. These are expected on sites that would either require a full or reserved matters application, a new planning application, construction would need to resume or, for potential sites, be granted planning permission for housing.

5.9 The housing trajectories take account of all sites identified in the housing land supply set out in the HELAA for years 0-5 and beyond and shows the net additional dwellings which are expected over this time period.

22

Adequacy of Housing Provision

5.10 In Error! Reference source not found. we assess whether the housing target (1,246 dpa) can be achieved through a combination of outstanding planning commitments (i.e. deliverable sites) together with windfall sites and the sites deemed to be ‘developable’.

Table 7: Borough Housing Target vs Housing Trajectory

Total additions 2020/21-2024/25

Total additions 2025/26-2029/30

Total additions 2031/32-2038/39

Total additions

during whole Plan period

Deliverable 5,568 1,936 1,479 8,983

Developable 0 6,284 1,969 8,253

Windfall 0 550 550 1,540

Publication London Plan Housing Target

6,230 6,230 9968 22,428

Publication London Plan Housing Target with 20% buffer applied17

7,476 7,476 7,476 22,428

Shortfall against housing target

662 -2,540 (surplus)

5,970 3,652

Shortfall against housing target with 20% buffer applied

1,908 -1,294 (surplus)

3,478 3,652

5.11 The table above indicates that the current deliverable and developable supply would lead to a shortfall against the London Plan (2021) housing target. Consequently, in line with the methodology, the following steps could be undertaken to increase the supply:

• Review estimated capacities on ‘developable’ sites to assess if there is scope for densities to be increased;

• Run a further call for sites to see if additional sites in the urban area are now available;

• Gather further up to date information on strategic sites in the urban area so these could be considered to form part of the developable supply;

• Review sites currently considered ‘potentially developable’ with policy constraints e.g. Strategic Industrial Land and Green Belt.

17 As a result of the housing delivery test results, a 20% buffer is added to the housing target for 0-5 years. However, the housing target for the overall plan period remains the same; the intention of the buffer is to front-load the delivery of housing as a result of historic shortfall.

23

6. Conclusion

6.1 The Enfield HELAA has assessed potential sites in the borough and their expected future land use, density and timescale for development. This HELAA report provides a snapshot of the housing and economic land supply position as of 1 April 2021.

6.2 Housing and economic land supply is constantly evolving with new sites gaining permission, sites being completed and potential land coming forward. As such, the HELAA will be reviewed regularly to capture changes which have taken place since the publication of this report.

6.3 The HELAA process also provides an opportunity for stakeholders to be involved in shaping the land supply position. Suggestions for additional sites are welcomed, alongside the provision of additional information on any of the existing sites contained within the HELAA.

6.4 Enfield’s current local housing uncapped need based on MHCLG’s standard methodology is 4,397 new homes per year. This requirement represents a significant increase on the previous housing target of 798 homes per year set out in the London Plan, 2016 and the current London Plan target of 1,246 homes a year. Whilst the HELAA demonstrates that there is a considerable amount of potential housing land currently available, there will be a need to identify further land if future housing targets are to be met.

6.5 A total of 1,024 sites were considered but following a data cleanse to remove duplicate entries and those with insufficient information to assess only 660 sites were taken forward for further assessment as set out in the HELAA methodology.

6.6 Stage 1 of the methodology identified 7 sites which were affected by significant hard constraints and which were therefore excluded from further analysis.

6.7 Of the remaining 653 non-excluded sites which could be assessed further in Stage 2, 613 sites were assessed for housing or housing-led mixed use development; 32 sites for employment uses; and 8 sites were assessed for other uses such as nature recovery, leisure, recreation and sporting uses, or burial needs.

Housing Land Supply

6.8 Of the 613 sites assessed for housing or housing-led mixed use, 316 were assessed as being deliverable, 100 as developable, 167 as potentially developable and 30 sites were classed as being not developable.

6.9 Table 8 sets out the potential HELAA supply from the 735 sites considered to be either deliverable, developable or potentially developable:

Table 8: HELAA Housing Supply Summary

HELAA category Total additions 2020/21-2024/25 (Years 0-5)

Total additions 2025/26-2029/30 (Years 6-10)

Total additions 2031/32+ (Years 11-15+)

Total additions All periods

Deliverable 5,568 1,936 1,479 8,983

Developable 0 6,284 1,969 8,253

Potentially Developable

0 9,564 12,383 21,947

Current windfall allowance

0 550 990 1,540

24

Total 5,568 18,334 16,821 40,723

Total excluding ‘potentially developable

5,568 8,770 4,438 18,776

Economic Land Supply

6.10 A total of 32 sites were assessed for economic uses.

6.11 7 sites were identified that had extant consent for employment uses but had yet to be implemented. It is anticipated these will deliver 12,986sqm of industry/logistics floorspace and 6552sqm office floorspace.

6.12 The remaining 25 sites were submitted through the borough’s call for sites. Of these 14 sites in the urban area were identified as having potential for employment use or mixed-use with an employment component with an estimated capacity of 132,959 sqm (30ha) of floorspace. At present, many of the sites are either in retail use and/or industrial sites wanting to introduce housing as part of mixed-use proposals. A further 11 sites located within the Green Belt were identified as having potential for employment use or mixed-use with an employment component with an employment component with an estimated capacity of 223,550sqm (51ha) of floorspace.

6.13 The 132,959 sqm industrial/logistics land supply identified within the urban area falls short of the 251,505 sqm (55ha) of forecast demand as identified within the ELR. This leaves a shortfall of roughly half of the floorspace needed for industry and logistics.

25

Appendices

26

Appendix A: Glossary

Achievability A site which is regarded achievable for development where there is a practical view that housing can be developed on the site at a certain point in time. This is fundamentally a judgement about the economic viability of the site, and the capacity of the developer to complete and sell the housing over a certain period.

Allocation The council’s development plan identifies area of land for development. The allocation will also indicate the Council’s preferred use for the land.

Annual Monitoring Report (AMR)

A monitoring report submitted to the Government which reviews progress and the extent to which policies in Local Plan are being successfully implemented.

Availability A site which is seen as available for development, when, on the best information available, there is confidence that there are no legal or ownership problems, such as multiple ownerships, ransom strips, tenancies or operational requirements of landowners. This means that it is controlled by a housing developer who has expressed an intention to develop, or the landowner has expressed an intention to sell.

Brownfield A land which is or was occupied by a permanent structure, including curtilage of the developed land and any associated fixed surface infrastructure.

Call for Sites Exercise undertaken by the Council inviting interested parties to submit sites for consideration in the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment and the Local Plan.

Community A ‘Community’ includes all individuals, groups and organisations that live, work and operate within specific geographic areas.

Community Infrastructure Levy

A levy allowing local authorities to raise funds from owners or developers of land undertaking new building projects in their area.

Conservation Area Areas of special architectural or historic interest, the character, appearance or setting of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance.

Deliverability A site is considered to be deliverable if it is available now, offers a suitable location for housing development now and there is a reasonable prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within 5 years from the date of adoption of the plan.

Density A measure illustrating the potential number of dwellings that can be accommodated within a defined area. (Usually measured as the number of dwellings per hectare). See also Gross Density and Net Density.

Developable A site should be in a suitable location for housing development, and there should be a reasonable prospect that it will be available for and could be viably developed at a specific point in time.

Development Plan A document setting out the local planning authority’s policies and proposals for the development and use of land and buildings in the authority’s area. This includes adopted Local Plans, neighbourhood plans and the London Plan, and is defined in section 38 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

Green Belt Green Belt is a designation that restricts certain types of development. Its aims and purposes are set out in the NPPF under protecting Green Belt Land. It is an area of open land defined on the Proposals Map, where strict controls on development are applied in order to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built up areas, safeguard the countryside from encroachment, prevent neighbouring towns from merging with one another, preserve the special character of historic towns and assist in urban regeneration.

Gross Density Applying the total area of a site to the Density measurement, before discounting any land for uses not directly associated with housing.

Housing Trajectory Report comparing past housing supply performance against future rates of predicted supply.

27

Local Development Database (LDD)

A joint project between the Mayor and the London boroughs to monitor planning permissions, starts and completions throughout London which began in 2004.

Local Plan The Local Plan contains a series of local development documents (LDDs) that set out how the borough will change and develop in the future and how its places and environs will be protected and enhanced, these are drawn up by the Local Planning Authority

London Plan The London Plan is the name given to the Mayor’s spatial development strategy for the capital in the United Kindgom and published by the Greater London Authority.

Local Planning Authority The local authority or council that is empowered by law to exercise planning functions.

Net Density Measurement of the site's area that will be developed for housing and directly associated uses (i.e. discounting land for shops, major roads, wider open spaces).

National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)

This sets out the Governments requirements on planning policy for England and how it expects them to be applied.

Permitted Development (or Permitted Development Rights)

Permission to carry out certain limited forms of development without the need to make an application to a local planning authority, as granted under the terms of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order.

Scheduled Ancient Monuments

(Class 1 Archaeological Areas) – Archaeological remains which enjoy special protection by virtue of being scheduled under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979.

Special Protection Area (SPA)

Areas which have been identified by the European Commission as being of international importance for certain breeding, feeding, wintering or migration of rare and vulnerable species of bird populations found within the EU countries. They have statutory protection under the EC Directive for the Conservation of Wild Birds 79/409.

Suitability A site is considered suitable for housing development if it offers a suitable location for development and would contribute to the creation of sustainable, mixed communities. For sites not allocated for housing in development plans or having the benefit of planning permission for housing, policy restrictions, physical problems or limitations, potential impacts and environmental conditions should be considered.

Windfall Sites Sites that have not been identified in the local plan process and comprising previously developed sites that have unexpectedly become available.

28

Appendix B: LB Enfield sources reviewed in relation to PPG guidance

The NPPG sets out a list of sources that were reviewed18.

PPG list of types of site PPG list of potential data sources

Enfield Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment – Sources to be reviewed

Existing housing and economic development allocations and site development briefs not yet with planning permission

Local and neighbourhood plans Planning applications records Development Briefs

Sites identified through Neighbourhood Plans in Enfield Existing Development Plan Allocations not yet completed Sites with development briefs and/or developer masterplan The most recent London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) 2017 Sites currently at pre-application stage

Planning Permissions for housing and economic development that are unimplemented or under construction

Planning application records Development starts and completions records

Enfield Planning Applications (1 April 2016 to 31 March 2021) The GLA’s London Development Database Enfield Annual Monitoring Reports Enfield Housing Trajectory

Planning applications that have been refused or withdrawn

Planning application records Enfield Planning Applications (1 April 2016 to 31 March 2021)

Land in the local authority’s ownership

Local authority records The LBE-submitted returns from Enfield’s 2019 - 2021 Call for Sites and Call for Small Sites (including additional consultation with LBE Housing and Property regarding Council estates with capacity for intensification and other Council owned land either surplus or likely to become surplus over Plan period)

Surplus and likely to become surplus public sector land

National register of public sector land Engagement with strategic plans of other public sector bodies such as county councils, central government, National Health Service, police, fire services, utilities services, statutory undertakers

Public sector land including that owned by GLA and TfL, either surplus or likely to become surplus over Plan period, in addition to that identified through the Call for Sites (identified through direct communications with ‘GLA family’)

Sites with permission in principle, and identified brownfield land

Brownfield land registers (parts 1 and 2) National Land Use Database Valuation Office database

Enfield Brownfield Land Register

18 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/820367/190718_paragraph_012_table_PUBLICATION_FINAL.pdf

29

PPG list of types of site PPG list of potential data sources

Enfield Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment – Sources to be reviewed

Active engagement with sector

Enfield Planning Applications (1 April 2016 to 31 March 2021) which include PiP Call for Sites Submission by Enfield Road Watch and CPRE and their “Space to Build Enfield” report

Vacant and derelict land and buildings (including empty homes, redundant and disused agricultural buildings, potential permitted development changes, e.g. offices to residential)

Local authority empty property register English Housing Survey National Land Use Database Commercial property databases (eg estate agents and property agents) Valuation Office database Active engagement with sector Brownfield land registers

Sites from all categories can fall into this category: Enfield Planning Applications (1948 to 6 March 2020) The returns from Enfield’s 2019 - 2021 Call for Sites and Call for Small Sites (including additional consultation with relevant LBE stakeholders regarding Council estates with capacity for intensification and Council owned land either surplus or likely to become surplus over Plan period) Public sector land, including that owned by GLA and TfL, either surplus or likely to become surplus over Plan period, in addition to that identified through the Call for Sites (identified through direct consultation with ‘GLA family’) Sites currently at pre-application stage Existing Development Plan Allocations not yet completed Sites with development briefs and/or developer masterplans The most recent London Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) 2017 Call for Sites Submission by Enfield Road Watch and CPRE and their “Space to Build Enfield” report The GLA’s London Development Database Enfield Annual Monitoring Reports Enfield Housing Trajectory Enfield Brownfield Land Register Sites identified through Neighbourhood Plans in Enfield

30

PPG list of types of site PPG list of potential data sources

Enfield Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment – Sources to be reviewed

Additional opportunities for un-established uses (e.g. making productive use of under-utilised facilities such as garage blocks)

Ordnance Survey maps Aerial photography Planning applications Site surveys

Sites from all categories can fall into this category (see above)

Business requirements and aspirations

Enquiries received by local planning authority Active engagement with sector

N/A as this study considers only land for housing; the PPG includes methodology for housing and economic land assessment together

Sites in rural locations Local and neighbourhood plans Planning applications Ordnance Survey maps Aerial photography Site surveys

Sites identified through Neighbourhood Plans in Enfield The returns from Enfield’s 2019 - 2021 Call for Sites and Call for Small Sites (including additional consultation with LBE Housing and Property regarding Council estates with capacity for intensification and Council owned land either surplus or likely to become surplus over Plan period) Planning applications 2016-2021 Call for Sites Submission by Enfield Road Watch and CPRE and their “Space to Build Enfield” report

31

Appendix C: Detailed methodology for steps 1-6 of site assessment (Stage 2)

Step 1: Site Surveys The site surveys involved both a desk-based assessment and where appropriate, site assessment by officers. The surveys include collecting and assigning information relevant to each site including:

• Site size and address

• Site boundary including assessment of site overlaps

• Ward

• Whether there are any planning permissions / consents on the site or development progress (e.g. ground works completed, number of units started, number of units completed)

• Initial assessment of whether the site is suitable for a particular type of use or as part of a mixed-use development

• Whether there are any lapsed consents

• Current land use and character of surrounding area (bad neighbour impacts)

• Owner intentions (including through discussion with relevant stakeholders where required);

• Potential physical constraints, environmental constraints, access/highways and access to local services

• Planning policy constraints The identification of policy or highways constraints present on a site will not result in any such sites being excluded from assessment but will be noted and used in the determination of their development timeframes.

All sites identified for inclusion in the HELAA were mapped and information about them recorded in the sites database.

Step 2: Assessing availability This step assessed every site and determined whether they are available for development now or if it can reasonably be expected for them to become available during the Plan period. To establish whether a site is ‘available’, guidance in the NPPG19 was followed. It states that a site is considered available for development, when, on the best information available (confirmed by the ‘Call for Sites’ and information from land owners), there is confidence that there are no legal or ownership problems, such as unresolved multiple ownerships, ransom strips, tenancies or operational requirements of landowners. The existence of a planning permission does not necessarily mean that the site is available. This will often mean that the land is controlled by a developer or landowner who has expressed an intention to develop, or the landowner has expressed an intention to sell. Previous planning history may also be taken into account, for example the site may have a history of unimplemented permissions. 6 The following site statuses, where the site was not completed or superseded by a completed site, are considered to demonstrate evidence of availability, sufficient for them to be counted in the study:

• Sites submitted for planning application, prior approval, or pre-application in the last 5 years;

19 Paragraph: 019 Reference ID: 3-019-20190722

32

• Sites submitted to the London SHLAA Call for Sites;

• Sites submitted to the Council’s Call for Sites exercise by either a) a landowner or site promoter, or b) by a third party with evidence of availability from a landowner or site promoter;

• Publicly-owned land identified in consultation with the Council or the GLA family as likely to be available for development within the plan period; and

• Sites for which a Development Brief or Developer Masterplan has been drafted.

Where sites were submitted or suggested for assessment by a third party that is not the owner, developer or site promoter the study has aimed to establish such sites’ availability by further investigation and evidence gathering whilst having regard to the government guidance’s on taking a thorough but proportionate approach. These were sites that were either included as part of the call for sites exercise or included as part of London SHLAA 2017 where the availability was not assessed. The assessment of each site has been classified into the categories set out in the table below.

Available Sites where confirmation of availability within the next 15 years has been received from the landowner and there are no known legal issues or ownership problems.

Potentially available Sites where the landowner or a third party with an interest has promoted the land but confirmation has not been received from the landowner that the land will be available within the next 15 years. In particular, this might include land which is in multiple ownerships and may have site assembly issues, and land which accommodates an existing use which would require re-location but arrangements are not in place to achieve this.

Availability unknown Sites where the landowner has not expressed an interest in promoting the site; or landownership remains unknown following investigations; or the landowner has expressed an interest in promoting the site in the past but has not responded to subsequent enquiries for a period no shorter than three years; or the land is subject to legal issues upon which further information is required before a robust decision can be made on availability.

Not available Sites where the landowner has confirmed that the land is not available for development in the next 15 years or the land is subject to known legal issues which are unlikely to be overcome within the next 15 years.

The availability has been recorded in the assessment in terms of the timescale in which a proposal can come forward. The assessment of availability will assist in determining whether a suitable and achievable site can come forward within the first five years.

Step 3: Assessing suitability The NPPG indicates that a site/broad location can be considered suitable if it would provide an appropriate location for development when considered against relevant constraints and their potential to be mitigated20. Having collated all sites identified from all the various sources an initial sift has been undertaken to exclude sites that are not considered to have any reasonable development potential, having regard to national and local policies and designations. This step represents a high-level analysis of available sites’ suitability in planning terms for housing via the use of the geographic information systems (GIS). The first factors that will be assessed are general suitability factors such as planning policy and physical site constraints. The following general approach was taken in assessing suitability in relation to key issues:

20 Paragraph: 018 Reference ID: 3-018-20190722

33

• Location: Sites have been generally deemed ‘suitable’ with regard to this factor where they are located within areas that already have appropriate infrastructure and a suitable range of services, community and other facilities, and where the site is in conformity with the spatial strategy of the adopted development plan. Sites will generally be deemed ‘potentially suitable’ where appropriate infrastructure and a range of services, community and other facilities could be provided to support the development, and where the site is in conformity with the spatial strategy in the emerging development plan. Exceptions might occur for sites which are previously developed or where there are specific industrial requirements.

• Green Belt/MOL: Sites where the Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land assessment suggests land makes a lower contribution to the purposes of Green Belt have been generally be deemed ‘potentially suitable’ with regards to this factor. Sites where analysis suggests the land makes an important contribution to the purposes of Green Belt will generally be deemed ‘unsuitable’. (Exceptions might occur for sites which are previously developed, where there are specific industrial requirements, where development would support community aspirations or where there are specific sustainability benefits.)

• Employment: Sites proposed for housing uses in employment use but not designated for such uses have been generally deemed ‘suitable’ for redevelopment to provide improved employment premises or potentially to provide alternative uses such as housing, subject to other considerations. Sites which are designated for employment use have generally been deemed ‘unsuitable’ for alternative uses.

• Public Open Space: Sites which are designated or recognised public open spaces have generally been deemed ‘unsuitable’ for development. Exceptions could occur for sites where arrangements are in place to make alternative public open space provision, where development would fund improvements to the quality of the public open space, where the development is linked to the use of the area as public open space. Where relevant, sites which are currently designated or recognised public open spaces but emerging evidence and policy suggest the site is no longer required will generally be deemed potentially suitable for alternative uses.

• Local Green Space: Sites which are designated Local Green Space have generally been deemed unsuitable for development. Exceptions could occur for sites where development would fund improvements to the quality of the space, or where the development is linked to the use of the space.

• Scheduled Monuments: Sites which contain designated Scheduled Monuments and require demolition of this have been deemed unsuitable for development. Exceptions might occur for sites where development is linked to the benefit of the historic site.

• Historic Parks and Gardens: Sites which are within registered historic parks and gardens have generally been deemed unsuitable for development. Exceptions might occur for sites which are previously developed or where development is linked to the use of the area.

• Agricultural land: Sites which do not comprise best and most versatile agricultural land have generally been deemed suitable with regards to this factor. Sites which comprise best and most versatile agricultural land will generally be deemed unsuitable. Exceptions might occur for sites where there are specific industrial requirements, where development would support community aspirations or where there are specific sustainability benefits. There is very little Grade 1 or 2 agricultural land within the borough. However, Grade 3a agricultural land is considered to constitute ‘the best and most versatile agricultural land’. Where evidence of whether sites are located within 3a or 3b is not available, further evidence will be requested from the landowner/agent in future iterations of the SHLAA if the land might be considered for development.

• Other considerations: Further suitability considerations are set out in the list below; though this is not exhaustive.

The sites have been assessed against the environmental criteria and categorised into different levels according to their level of planning constraints. The constraints set out in the table below have been carefully considered. Development within such locations could still be suitable depending on the size

34

of the site and the extent to which the constraint covers a site and its potential impact. Where a site is partially covered by Level 1 constraints capacity has been estimated on the remaining portion. For sites partially covered by Level 2 constraints capacity has been estimated for their entirety, as these sites will only be considered ‘potentially suitable’ and further work would need to be undertaken to assess whether there is a need to review policy designations. These constraints are likely to have an impact on the capacity of a site (e.g. affect design and layout) and the timing of when development may take place.

Level 1 – Sites to be excluded

• Grade 1 and 2 agricultural land

• Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

• Special Areas of Conservation (SAC)

• Ramsar sites

• Ancient Woodland

• National Nature Reserves (NNR)

• Special Protection Area (SPA)

• Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG)

• Cemeteries

• Common land

• Flood Risk Zone 3

Level 2 – Sites with policy constraints to be considered

• Green Belt

• Metropolitan Open Land

• Strategic Industrial Land

• Locally Significant Industrial Sites

• Flood Risk Zone 2

• Lee Valley Regional Park

• Scheduled Ancient Monuments

• Historic Parks and Gardens

• Contaminated land where mitigation would not be possible

• Local Open Space

• Allotments

• Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC)

• Grade 3a agricultural land

• Notified Safety Zones (gas, aerodromes etc)

The assessment of each site has been classified into the categories set out in the table below. The assessment of suitability is indicative only and does not prejudice assessments made through the Local Plan or planning application processes.

Suitable The site offers a suitable location for development and there are no known constraints which significantly inhibit development for the defined use

Potentially suitable The site offers a potentially suitable location for development but is subject to a policy designation which inhibits development for the defined use. The development plan process will determine the future suitability for the defined use

Suitability unknown The site requires further assessment before a robust decision can be made on its suitability for being developed for the defined use

Unsuitable The site does not offer a suitable location for being developed for the defined use or there are known constraints which significantly inhibit development. The site is unlikely to be found suitable.

Step 4: Assessing achievability This step assessed all the available and suitable sites’ viability. To establish whether a site is ‘achievable’ guidance in the NPPG was followed which states that a site is considered achievable for

35

development where there is a reasonable prospect that the particular type of development will be developed on the site at a particular point in time21. This is essentially a judgement about the economic and viability of a site, and the capacity of the developer to complete and let or sell the development over a certain period. Given the importance of a site’s suitability and availability to the assessment of achievability, the Council will ordinarily only undertake an assessment of sites which have been assessed as suitable or potentially suitable, or available or potentially available. It is considered impractical to do detailed viability assessments of all sites and broad locations. A more general assessment approach has therefore been undertaken. The Council has drawn on generic viability information, such as that which has been used to inform the Community Infrastructure Levy, as well as considering whether sites of a similar nature in a similar area have been recently delivered together with a range of factors including:

Site factors:

• Availability of access;

• Agreements regarding necessary third-party land or property.

Market factors:

• Adjacent uses;

• Economic viability of existing, proposed and alternative uses in terms of land values;

• Attractiveness of the locality;

• Level of potential market demand.

Cost factors:

• Site preparation costs relating to any physical constraints;

• Abnormal works costs;

• Strategic infrastructure costs;

• Prospect of funding or investment to address identified constraints or assist development.

Delivery factors:

• Phasing / realistic build out rates;

• Single developer or several developers offering different housing product;

• Size and capacity of the developer.

The assessment of each site has been classified into the categories set out in the table below.

Achievable There is a reasonable prospect that the site will be developed for the defined use within the next 15 years

Potentially achievable The achievability of the site is inhibited by an external factor where the timing of resolution is unknown. The delivery of the resolution will determine the future achievability of the site.

Achievability unknown The site is subject to issues upon which further information is required before a robust decision can be made on achievability

Unachievable There is no reasonable prospect that the site will be developed for the defined use within the next 15 years

21 Paragraph: 020 Reference ID: 3-020-20190722

36

Step 5: Finalising assessment outcome This step comprised summarising the environmental, availability and achievability assessment of the sites. Sites with no clear reasons as to why the site could not be developed are identified as such. Once the suitability, availability and achievability of sites have been assessed, and any constraints identified, the likely timescale and rate of development for each site has been assessed. This will be continuously updated throughout the Local Plan Review process, with advice being sought from developers on likely timetables, progress made, and any further constraints which may arise. For sites in the HELAA that are considered to have development potential, a judgement has been made on when they are likely to be capable of being delivered. In accordance with landowner intentions or other identified site-specific matters which may affect the timescales by which sites can come forward, the likely phasing of deliverable sites is taken into account. Information on sites’ suitability, availability and achievability has been used to make a judgement on when sites are likely to be brought forward. It is proposed that information on indicative lead in times and build out rates will be gathered from a range of sources, including knowledge of recent development sites in the borough, information provided by developers and landowners and engagement with stakeholders. For sites where specific information was not available the following assumptions on lead in time to first completions have been used:

• +0 months for sites where works on site have commenced;

• +24 months for sites with a current full planning permission;

• +30 months for sites with prior approval for development and “hybrid” permission; and,

• +36 months for sites with a current outline planning permission.

The assessment of each site has been classified into the categories set out in the table below.

• Sites classified as “deliverable” or “developable” may be expected to be developed within the next 15 years.

• Sites classified as “potentially developable” comprise a basket of sites from which some might be deemed developable following further consideration through the local plan process.

• Sites classified as “not developable within the next 15 years” cannot realistically be expected to be developed in the foreseeable future.

Deliverable (years 1-5) The site is available for development, offers a suitable location for the defined use, and is achievable with a realistic prospect that the defined use will be delivered on the site within 5 years.

Developable (years 6-10, 11-15)

The site is a suitable location for defined use and there is a reasonable prospect that the site is available and could be viably developed in years 6-10 or 11-15

Potentially developable The site has been identified as potentially suitable and/or potentially available. Whether the site becomes developable will depend on further assessment through the plan making process, e.g. whether circumstances support the amendment or removal of existing designations, and further investigations into its availability

Not developable within the next 15 years

Those sites assessed as having significant policy and/or environmental constraints that means that the site is unlikely to be become suitable in the next 15 years. Those sites assessed as being unlikely to become available in the next 15 years. Those sites assessed as having no reasonable prospect of becoming achievable in the next 15 years

37

Step 6: Site capacity Following Step 5, site capacities for all suitable and potentially suitable sites have been determined. This step involved identifying a site capacity for each site. As an overarching principle, sites aimed to make the best use of land. Every site has its own characteristics and specific set of circumstances that may influence the net developable area and density. Estimating Housing Capacity For the vast majority of housing sites, this has been done through a design typology case study approach. Design typology case studies will be applied to all sites under a certain size threshold, the rationale for this approach is discussed below. A set of locally specific and appropriate design case studies has been developed based on local considerations. Each suitable site has then been assigned the most appropriate, relevant design typology depending on its own context and characteristics. Assignation of a design case study for each suitable and available site then enables its capacity to be estimated. This approach has been successfully defended at examination previously. The design case studies have set reasonable, Enfield-specific assumptions about the potential capacity of sites in view of the regional and local policy and evidence context. This has taken a design-led approach, taking into account a wide number of important factors, including, but not limited to:

• Appropriate building heights;

• Infrastructure capacity, including provision of blue green infrastructure requirements;

• Development viability;

• Climate change, nature recovery and biodiversity requirements;

• Provision of car parking;

• Piccadilly Line upgrades and other planned improvements to public transport accessibility;

• Environmental considerations; and

• Design and heritage considerations (having appropriate regard to conservation areas and listed buildings).

The following table sets out the broad typologies for which case studies have been collated. More detailed information on the specific case studies within each typology, the density, dwelling mix, parking ratio, building heights and PTAL are included within Appendix C.

Typology Sub-category

House

A house is an individual dwelling that stands within its own plot, functioning independently of adjacent dwellings with no dwelling above or below it. Suitable opportunities for the use of a single house may be infill within a street setting or the curtilage of an existing house, or on a vacant or underused backland site.

Single storey

Detached

Semi-detached

Cluster

A cluster is a small collection of houses that form an ensemble on a single site. This could range in form from a homogeneous block to a series of individual, related buildings, e.g. detached,

38

semi-detached or stacked maisonettes. Clusters optimise site capacity by responding to site constraints and the character of the immediate context. Clusters efficiently share features, e.g. cores, utilities, parking, refuse storage and gardens.

Terrace

A terrace is a row of individual homes, producing a collective urban order due to their repetition, continuous street frontage and uniform appearance. Sub-types include those linked by a carport, townhouses or rows of mews houses. Terraced houses commonly have private gardens or courtyards, increasing their suitability for family housing. Terraced houses are separated by party walls and have their own private access from the street.

Mews (single aspect)

Mews (dual aspect)

Townhouses

Linear block

Linear blocks allow a similar relationship to the street as terraces, but offer higher densities by accommodating multiple dwellings in a vertical stack. Commonly, linear blocks comprise maisonettes at ground and first floors, with additional maisonettes or lateral apartments at upper floors. This enables homes on lower floors to have individual entrances on the street. Upper level homes may be paired around a lift or stair core, or accessed from a short corridor or external gallery.

Perimeter block (podium)

Perimeter block (no podium)

Mansion block

Courtyard

Villa block

The villa block is characterised by a central core and efficient circulation arrangement, typically with three to five dwellings per floor, per core. This enables habitable rooms to have views in multiple directions. Villa blocks provide an alternative to the terrace or linear block where the fronts and backs of dwellings conform to social and functional conventions about public access and private retreat. This makes the villa block ideal for use as a standalone building.

Tower

A tower is defined as being ten storeys or more. As with the villa block, the tower is characterised by a central core and efficient circulation arrangement, usually with four to five dwellings per floor, allowing habitable rooms to have views in multiple directions.

The aim of the capacity assessment is to provide a reasonable capacity estimate assessment in-principle, of sites that are suitable or potentially suitable, available and achievable for residential development. In this sense, the design case studies should be thought of as a guide to the available development potential rather than having any planning status of their own. Most sites being assessed are in private ownership. Therefore, the exact form, density and massing of the development that may eventually come forward will most likely be a product more of the planning application and determination process rather than of the capacity exercise. A slightly different approach has been adopted for larger sites which are known to be coming forward. Design case studies become less meaningful over a certain site size. For these larger sites, use has been made of, previous design or masterplan work, site promoter estimates (unless they are clearly not compliant with policy), and/or capacities already specified for the London SHLAA, or exemplars based on existing or proposed development in a comparable context. While we recognise that the London SHLAA sites’ capacity was determined by the GLA in line with the adopted London Plan Density Matrix and PTAL, and that this density matrix is no longer part of the new Draft London Plan, the principles of the density matrix and PTAL nevertheless remain at least a reliable starting point to

39

determining indicative density. In addition, when determining densities and capacities, an approach that has previously been approved at Examination by a planning inspector carries significant weight, and this applies to the London SHLAA approach, which has been tested not only through multiple London borough plans but also at the London Plan Examinations. The approach taken to estimating capacity for each site is clearly documented within the assessment in Appendix D. On the largest sites (generally sites over 10-15 hectares) there is also a need to reflect the additional land-take required for non-residential development including on-site infrastructure such as schools, employment and larger open space. Experience suggests that it would be appropriate and reasonable to apply net densities (which can differ significantly from gross densities on the same site), having regard to the local context, including recent similar developments or implemented planning applications. In the majority of cases this assumes 80% of the site as developable for housing, with the remainder required for infrastructure such as roads and utilities safeguarding buffers as well as social infrastructure such as open space and schools. Further iterative testing will take place, particularly on those sites considered for inclusion in the plan as strategic site allocations. The potential capacity of these may therefore vary considerably in order to accommodate on-site infrastructure requirements in line with the Infrastructure Capacity Assessment. The output from this step is an interim residential capacity figure across all suitable or potentially suitable identified sites that have evidence of current availability. Estimating Economic Land Capacity For the vast majority of sites with potential as new industrial locations, the indicative capacity has been assessed by applying a plot ratio of 65%, in line with Publication London Plan guidance22. A more tailored approach has been followed for sites where existing activities which need to be re-provided as part of a redevelopment scheme or for mixed-use sites. In these cases, the floorspace figure has discounted re-provided floorspace.

22 The Publication London Plan defines floorspace capacity as ‘the potential industrial and warehousing floorspace that could be accommodated on site at a 65 per cent plot ratio.’

40

Appendix D: Detailed Housing Typology Density Case Studies

Category and project name Location Site size No. of dwellings Net density Parking ratio Maximum no. of storeys Other uses PTAL Tenure mix Architect Notes and justification for inclusion Link to folder

ha dwellings/ha studio 1B 2B 3B 4B 5B 6B private % affordable %

House single-storey detached

Horsted Park (Phase 1) Chatham, Kent 4.1 154 37.6 30 30 52 42 1.8 3 N/A N/A 75 25 Proctor and Matthews ArchitectsEdge of settlement

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\2 House\Horsted Park

House 4 Dublin, Ireland x 0.022 1 45.5 1 1 2 N/A N/A 100 TAKASide garden of existing corner house.Private home.

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\2 House\House 4

North Street Barking and Dagenham, London 0.16 14 87.5 12 2 1 2.5 N/A 6a 0 100 Peter BarberNarrow verge site/constrained sites. Affordable Rent dwellings for people downsizing their homes within the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham.

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\2 House\North Street

Hidden House Islington, London x 0.0096 1 104.2 1 1 N/A 6b 100 Coffey Architects R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\2 House\Hidden House

Cluster

Hedge Hill Enfield, London0.07 3 42.86 1 2 1 1 N/A 2 100 0 Peter Barber Architects R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\3 Cluster\Hedge Hill

Essex Mews Croydon, London0.07 3 42.86 3 1 3 N/A 3 100 0 MW Architects R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\3 Cluster\Essex Mews

single aspect dual aspect

Ordnance Road LB Enfield 0.196 15 76.5 4 11 1.06 3 N/A 2 100 Peter Barber Architects R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\Ordnance Road

Perry Mead LB Enfield 0.089 4 44.9 1 3 1 3 N/A 3 100 Peter Barber Architects R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\Perry Mead

Marmalade Lane Cambridge 0.87 42 48.3 9 15 7 10 1 1.2 3 297 N/A 95 5 Mole ArchitectsCo-housing. Other uses are commons house, workshop, gym, guest rooms

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\Marmalade Lane

Goldsmith Street Norwich 1.28 106 82.8 56 44 1 5 0.8 3 N/A N/A 100 Mikhail RichesLargest Passivhaus scheme in the UK

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\Goldsmith Street

South Chase Lot 3 Newhall, Essex x 0.44 29 65.9 29 2 3 N/A N/A 65 35 Alison Brooks ArchitectsBack to back terrace. 8.5m x 9.5 house plot. Tenure mix to be checked.

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\South Chase Lot 3

Timekeepers Square Salford 0.538 36 66.9 14 19 3 0.87 3 N/A N/A 100 0 Buttress R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\Timekeepers Square

Ordnance Mews Westminster, London x 0.026 3 115.4 2 1 1 3 N/A 4 0 100 Metropolitan WorkshopWithin St. John's Wood CA

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\4 Terrace\Ordnance Mews

podium no podium

Hammond Court Waltham Forest, London x 0.35 43 122.86 10 10 17 6 0.1 5 N/A 5 49 51 Mae R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Hammond Court

Trafalagar Place Southwark, London x 1 235 235.00 9 85 116 23 2 0.2 10 commercial - 179m2 6b 75 25 dRMM R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Trafalgar Place

Ryle Yard Eddington, Cambridge x 0.45 73 162.22 20 53 0.1 5 N/A N/A 0 100 Maccreanor Lavington R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Ryle Yard

Buccleuh House Hackney, London x 0.59 107 181.36 49 36 12 10 0.3 6 elderly housing 2 36 64 Levitt BernsteinIt provides three tenure types for three distinct users – delivering 41 independent homes for older people, 28 affordable-rent and shared-ownership apartments for the local Orthodox Jewish population and 38 private-sale apartments.

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Buccleuh House

Brentford Lock West (Block E and F) Hounslow, London x 0.9 157 174.44 55 69 27 6 0.74 7 N/A 2,3 60 40 Mae R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Brentford Lock West (Block E and F)

Harvard Gardens Southwark, London x 0.88 147 167.05 30 71 12 34 0.4 10 N/A 4 48 52 Pollard Thomas EdwardsA mix of townhouses, mews, ground floor maisonettes and upper floor duplexes, 1-2 bedroom flats

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Harvard Gardens

Sutherland Road Hackney, London x 0.43 59 137.21 12 40 7 0.4 5 health centre - 650 m2 2 0 100 Levitt Bernstein R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Sutherland Road

The Echoes Thurrock x 0.39 53 135.90 13 33 7 1.03 6 N/A N/A 0 100 Bell Phillips R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\The Echoes

Paxton House Croydon, London x 0.3 34 113.33 3 28 3 N/A 5 N/A 5 100 0 Alma-nacGallery access and retrofit

R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Paxton House

Park View Mansions, Chobham Manor Newham, London x 0.43 88 204.65 23 12 49 4 0.39 6 N/A 3 100 0 Haworth Tmpkins R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Park View Mansions

Burridge Gardens (Phase 1) Wandsworth, London x 0.66 153 231.82 44 72 23 14 0.88 6 N/A 6b 48 52 Hawkins Brown R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\5 Linear Block\Burridge Gardens

Villa block

Brentford Lock West (Block G) Brentford, London 0.43 45 104.7 12 18 15 0 5 N/A 2 100 0 Duggan Morris Architects R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\6 Villa block\Brentford Lock West (Block G)

Finsbury Park Villas Hackney, London 0.22 44.3 201.4 18 12 10 4 0.3 6 N/A 6a 0 100 Sergison Bates R:\Environment\Strategic Planning\Heritage & Design\URBAN DESIGN TEAM\Typologies Library\Case studies\6 Villa block\Finsbury Park Villas

N/A

N/A

semi-detached

x

x

townhouses

x

x

x

x

x

Linear block perimeter block mansion courtyard

Terrace

Dwelling mixSub-category

mews

41

Appendix E: Full Assessment of potential sites

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

Site HELAA Reference

Site Source  Site Source Reference  Site name / address Postcode Ward  Site area (ha) Current Land Use Proposed Use

Character of existing area

Potential physical 

Access to local services

Owner / developer intentions  Known Legal Issues

Availability Period 

Overall availability 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 

Level 1 Constraints

Level 1 Constraints Overall Suitability Conclusion 

Market Factors  Cost Factor Dependencies Site and Delivery Factors When is the site 

When is the site likely to 

When is the site likely to 

When is the site 

Overall Achievability 

Applied typologies (inc. sub cats)

Estimated capacity 

Existing homes to 

Estimated capacity 

Net homes already 

Remaining Estimate 

Typology assumptions  Overall Conclusion  Overall Conclusion Notes 

Site HELAA Reference

Site Source  Site Source Reference  Site name / address Postcode Ward  Site area (ha) Current Land Use Proposed Use

Character of existing area

Potential physical

Access to local services

Owner / developer intentions  Known Legal Issues

Availability Period

Overall availability

Flood Zone

Special

Sites of

Special

RAMSAR

National

Ancient

Suitable

Grade 1

Include / Exclude

Notes  Grade 3 Agricultur

Green Belt / 

Strategic Industrial 

Locally Significan

Flood Risk Zone 

Lee Valley 

Scheduled Ancient 

Historic Parks and 

Contaminated land 

Local Open 

Allotments 

Notified Safety 

Site of Importan

Common Land 

Cemeteries

Overall Suitability Conclusion

 Suitability Notes Market Factors  Cost Factor Dependencies Site and Delivery Factors 0‐5 years (2020/21‐

6‐10 years (2025/26‐

11‐19 years (2030/31 ‐

Beyond Plan

Overall Achievability

Estimated capacity

Existing homes to

Estimated capacity

Net homes already

Remaining Estimate

Typology assumptions  Overall Conclusion  Overall Conclusion Notes 

BOC1 Call for Sites LP1158, LP574 Tewkesbury Terrace N11 2LT Bowes 0.05 Open green space withResidential Low density dwellings 

Mature trees o

Close proximity to local amenities 

DevelopHouse on site currently tenanted

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

Potential additional abnormal costs due to picadilly line beneath site (e.g. legal costs / noise/vibration mitigation costs.)

Potential deliverability constraints arising from trees on site and picadillly line beneath site. 

0 4 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 77 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: Ordnance Road Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming ability to overcome constraints. 

BOC2 Call for Sites LP554 Site A (1‐7 Bowe1‐7 Bowes Road N13 4UX Bowes 0.15 Vacant land with scrub Residential Low density dwellings 

Access arrange

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs. None known. Trees on site may act as an constraint on development. 

0 19 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 130 ‐ ‐ 19 0 19 0 19Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 4 storeys. 4/5 of the case study density considered

Developable n/a

BOC3 Call for Sites LP554 Site C (151‐161 G151 ‐ 161 Green Lanes N13 4SP Bowes 0.09 Shops with residential  Residential Located on mixed use high street

Potential acce

Close proximity to local amenities 

Comprehensive redevelopment None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Additional costs of relocation of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

The owners of the access road to the rear of Green Lanes are not known. Existing buildings on site may have undesignated heritage value which may constrain capacity.

0 12 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 130 ‐ ‐ 12 0 12 0 12Case study:Paxton House. Height assumption; 5 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered Developable subject to addressing ownership considerations. 

BOC5 Call for Sites LP1196 Tottenhall Rd N13 6DJ Bowes 0.55 Car parking  Residential Existing estate

Unknown con

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 36 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 36 0 36 0 36Case study: South Chase Lot 3. Height assumption is 3 storeys. 

Developable n/a

BOP13 Planning Applicatio 17/04956/FUL Ridgeon Court 75 Palmerston Road London N22 8QT Bowes 0.19 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  ‐14 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 16 ‐14 0 ‐14 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BOP31 Planning Applicatio 19/03816/FULLand To Rear Of Haywood Court 1 ‐ 7 Oak Lane London

N11 2BE Bowes 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BOS2 SHLAA 2017 17100290 Open Space N13 6AF Bowes 1.18 Open Space Unknown Suburban housing

Lack of infrastLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown n/a

Availability Unknow

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include withPartly in Flood Risk 3

N Y N N Y N N N N N Partial N N N N Potentially SuitableApprox 50% of site covered by allotments and flood risk zone 2. Completely located within MOL

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

Potential additional costs for flood mitigation measures.  

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 0 98 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 98 0 98 0 98 Case study: Goldsmith Street  Potentially developableSite is located within open space and allotments. Potentially developable subject to policy constraints and viability. 

BUC1 Call for Sites LP608_4Bush Hill Station Car Park St Mark's Road, Enfield

EN1 1BA Bush Hill Park 0.2 Car parking  Residential Residental and retail, train station

Unknown con

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 13 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 13 0 13 0 13Case study: South Chase Lot 3. Height assumption is 3 storeys. 

Developable n/a

BUC2 Call for Sites LP1099 The Oak, 144 Firs Lane N21 2PJ Bush Hill Park 0.17 Vacant residential buildResidential Located within MOL ‐ open area

New independ

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable Located 100% in MOL

Extant planning consent on site for medical centre, but no potential purchaser found. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 34 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block 200 ‐ ‐ 34 0 34 0 34Case study: Finsbury Park Villas. Height assumption: 6 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to review of MOL designation. 

BUC4 Call for Sites LP1163 Rear of 27‐57 Firs Park Avenue (odds)  N21 2PR Bush Hill Park 0.14 Car parking  Residential Low density dwellings 

Unknown con

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

0‐5 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 11 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 11 0 11 0 11Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability.

BUC5 Call for Sites LP1188Rear of 10‐24 Ash Grove (evens) and 2‐16 Bideford Gardens (evens)

EN1 2LB Bush Hill Park 0.19 Garages Residential Low density dwellings 

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

0‐5 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Potential deliverability constraints/impact on capacity arising from access considerations 

0 15 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability.

BUC6 Call for Sites LP1168 Rear of 3‐15 Bideford Gardens (odds) EN1 2RP Bush Hill Park 0.12 Garages Residential Low density dwellings 

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

0‐5 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Potential deliverability constraints/impact on capacity arising from access considerations 

0 9 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability.

BUC7 Call for Sites LP1189 Rear of 98‐110 First Avenue (evens) EN1 1BP Bush Hill Park 0.11 Garages Residential Low density dwellings 

Unknown con

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

0‐5 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 8 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability.

BUC8 Call for Sites LP1196 Hyde Park Avenue N21 2PP Bush Hill Park 0.22 Car parking  Residential Low density dwellings 

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 9 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 Based on in‐house capacity study Developable n/a

BUE32 Enfield Road WatchLP662Esso and neighbouring block plus car park on Ayley Croft

‐ Bush Hill Park 0.29 Petrol Station & Car Pa Residential Low density dwellings 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential decontamination costs 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and absence of planning permission and the current use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 40 0 0 achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 137 ‐ ‐ 40 0 40 0 40Case study Sutherland Road. Height assumption: 5 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability and potential for viably decontaminating. 

BUP11 Planning Applicatio 17/02894/FUL 432 Church Street London N9 9HT Bush Hill Park 0.17 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of a pn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing housing

Potential access restrictions as a result of construction logistics above existing housing and retention of residents' parking

2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP12 Planning Applicatio 17/03970/FUL Pennsylvania Court 54 Elm Park Road N21 2HS Bush Hill Park 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Amendment pn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP18 Planning Applicatio 18/02582/FULLand At The Rear Of 29‐39 Elm Park Road London

N21 2HP Bush Hill Park 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

Potential additional costs as a result of construction next to several mature trees

None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP22 Planning Applicatio 18/04450/FUL 1‐24 River Bank London N21 2AA Bush Hill Park 0.87 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing housing

None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP25 Planning Applicatio 18/04864/FUL Cemetery House Church Street London N9 9HP Bush Hill Park 0.25 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP32 Planning Applicatio 19/04328/FUL 24 Queen Annes Place Enfield EN1 2PT Bush Hill Park 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP33 Planning Applicatio 17/00260/FUL 792 Green Lanes London  N21 2SH Bush Hill Park 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of development establn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Completed October 2020

BUP6 Planning Applicatio 17/00344/RE4 Bury Lodge Depot Bury Street West London N9 9LA Bush Hill Park 2.01 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road, utilities and flood mitigation 

Large site on MOL. Delivery rate likely to be restricted due to site size. 

49 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 50 1 49 0 49 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUP8 Planning Applicatio 17/01864/FUL Capitol House 794 Green Lanes London N21 2SH Bush Hill Park 0.27 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  91 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 91 0 91 0 91 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

BUP9 Planning Applicatio 17/02566/FUL8 Oakwood Parade Queen Annes Place Enfield

EN1 2PX Bush Hill Park 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

BUS1 SHLAA 2017 17100207 Express Dairies ‐ Bush Hill Park 0.38 Warehouses and car paUnknownSuburban housing

Adjacent matuLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown n/a

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable Located adjacent to MOL

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 49 0 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 130 ‐ ‐ 49 0 49 0 49Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 4 storeys (4/5 of case study density considered)

Potentially developableDevelopable subject to confirmation of availaiblity.

CHC1 Call for Sites LP031Warmerdams Nursery, Cattlegate Road, Enfield

EN2 9DX Chase 3.04 Plant Nursery  + housesResidential Open countryside

Constraints un

Located some distance from amenities

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses. None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 345 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 395 0 395 49 345

Case study: Ryle Yard. 80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC10 Call for Sites LP179Site at Oak Farm and Homestead Nursery, Cattlegate Road, Enfield 

EN2 Chase 2.62 Dwellings, builders storResidential  Countryside Existing uses o

Located some distance from amenities

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 340 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 340 0 340 0 340

Case study: Ryle Yard80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC11 Call for Sites LP472 – Parcel 1Land to the rear of Jesus Christ Church, Parcel 1

‐ Chase 1.7 Grassland Residential Low density dwellings 

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableIn Green Belt. Adjacent to SINC. Within conservation area. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

None known.  None known.  0 0 160 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 171 ‐ 160 0 160 0 160

Case study: 60% Goldsmith Street (218 hr/ha) + 40% Chobman Manor (816.3 hr/ha ‐ Height assumption: 5 storeys. 5/6 of density case study considered)80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CHC12 Call for Sites LP472 – Parcel 2Land to the south of Forty Hill C of E school, Forty Hill, Parcel 2

‐ Chase 2.15 Grassland Residential Low density dwellings 

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. Adjacent to SINC. Within conservation area. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

None known.  None known.  0 0 399 0 Achievable 4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 232 ‐ ‐ 399 0 399 0 399

Case study: Burridge Gardens. Height assumption: 6 storeys80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CHC13 Call for Sites LP472 – Parcel 3 Land to the south of Jesus Church, Parcel 3 ‐ Chase 0.95 Wooded area Residential Low density dwellings 

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. Adjacent to SINC. Within conservation area. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

None known.  None known.  0 0 41 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 171 ‐ ‐ 41 0 41 0 41

This site is heavily wooded and only 25% of the site has been considred for development. Case study: Chobman Manor. Height assumption: 5 storeys (5/6 of case density study considered)

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

TBC

Call for sites CFS30Camlet Way  Land north,  Camlet Way, Enfield 

EN4 0LJ Cockfosters 0.2

open space

Semi and detasuburban housing

none known

Acceptable proximity to local services.  sheltered housing

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Potentially suitable

sheltered housing scheme potential ‐10‐15 units

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 15 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15dependent on type of scheme/ assisted help

Deliverable

CHC15 Call for Sites LP639 Land to the North of Crews Hill Station EN2 Chase 12.3 Vacant grassland and b Residential Open countryside

Unknown con

Potential access constraints due to adjacency to Motorway

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableLocated within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Unknown. None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 370 0 Achievable 1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 38 ‐ ‐ 370 0 370 0 370

Case study: Horsted Park. 80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CHC17 Call for Sites LP645 Towneley Nurseries, Theobalds Park EN2 9DH Chase 1.7 Car Park  Residential Open countryside

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableLocated within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Unknown. None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 113 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 113 0 113 0 113

Case study: Goldsmith Street. 80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CHC18 Call for Sites LP649Brown’s Garden Village, Theobalds Park Rd, Enfield 

EN2 9DG Chase 0.94 Garden Centre Residential Open countryside

Existing uses o

Located some distance from amenities

Redevelop Unknown 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableLocated within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses.  None known.  0 0 62 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 62 0 62 0 62Case study: Goldsmith Street. 20% of site excluded due to need for access and open space on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CHC19 Call for Sites LP651 Theobalds Park Road Nursery EN2 9BH Chase 0.51 Plant Nursery Residential Open countryside

Constraints un

Located some distance from amenities

DevelopSingle ownership

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses. None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 30 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 30 0 30 0 30Case study: Goldsmith Street. 30% of site excluded due to need for access and open space on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC2 Call for Sites LP056Wolden Garden Centre, Cattlegate Road, Crews Hill, Enfield

EN2 9DX Chase 1.19 Plant Nursery Residential Open countryside

Constraints un

Located some distance from amenities

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses. None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 135 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 135 0 135 0 135Case study: Ryle Yard30% of site excluded due to need for access and open space on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC21 Call for Sites LP715, LP1152Land at Crews Hill, Theobalds Park Road, Enfield

EN2 9BQ Chase 7.06 Horticultural  Residential Countryside and wooded area. 

Existing uses o

Located some distance from amenities

Redevelop Unknown 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableLocated within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses. None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 304 0 Potentially achiev1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 38 48 ‐ 212 0 212 ‐91 303

Case study: 50% semi‐detached ( Horsted Park) + 50% terraces ( Marmalade Lane). 80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CHC24 Call for Sites LP1196 Ivinghoe Close (1‐24) EN1 3HS Chase 0.12 Garages Residential Low density dwellings 

None known.

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop

No direct contact has beenmade with the leaseholder at this time.

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known.  None known.  0 8 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 Case study: South Chase Lot 3  Developable n/a

CHC25 Call for Sites LP1196 Meyer Green Garages  EN1 4NG Chase 0.1 Garages Residential  Develop None known.

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop None known. 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a. However adjacent to MOL and SINC

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known.  Potential access constraints.  0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

CHC26 Call for Sites LP1196Brigadier Hill Garages, 1‐21 Wetherby Road, Enfield

EN2 0NJ Chase 0.06 Garages Residential Low density dwellings 

None known.

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known.  None known.  0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

CHC27 Call for Sites LP1196 Chapel Street EN2 6QF Town 0.06 Car parking  Residential Built up area  Conservation A

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known.  None known.  0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

Findings and Outcome

Estimated density (dwellings/ha)

Site Information  Availability  Suitability Achievability Capacity

Level 2 constraints

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

CHC3 Call for Sites LP107 Burton Farm Ride EN2 9AX Chase 41.45 Open fields, former rid Residential Open countryside

Constraints un

Located outside of existing settlement boundary and some distance from amenities

DevelopSingle ownership

11‐15 years; 1

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Exclude 15% covered by Flood Risk Zone 3 Y Y N N Y N N N N N N N Y N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Large site with significant environmental and policy constraints to overcome through plan‐making process. Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. Delivery rate likely to be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 464 464 Potentially achiev1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 38 48 ‐ 927 0 927 0 927

Case study: 50% semi‐detached ( Horsted Park) + 50% terraces ( Marmalade Lane). 15% of site within Flood Zone 3 excluded. Assumed 70% developable for residential and 30% for associated road and social infrastructure / other associated uses.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC5 Call for Sites LP1138, LP1132Land opposite Enfield Crematorium (aka The Dell). Great Cambridge Road 

EN1 4DS Chase 4.07 Vacant scrubland Residential At edge of existing settlement

Existing trees o

Located some distance from amenities

DevelopLeases on site until 2031. 

11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% located within Green Belt and Local Open Space

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 270 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 270 0 270 0 270

Case study: Goldsmith Street80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC6 Call for Sites LP1141 East Lodge, Botany Bay  EN2 8AS Chase 4.27 East Lodge Village BusinResidential (caOpen countryside

The central pa

Located some distance from amenities

Develop

Contains unregistered land.. Currently leased. Has restrictive covenants. 

6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N Partial N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. Part of site is within a SINC. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 128 0 Potentially achiev1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 38 ‐ ‐ 128 0 128 0 128

Case study: Horsted Park80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC7 Call for Sites LP1142 Crews Hill Golf Club  EN2 8AZ Chase 43.97 Golf Club/ Course Residential Open countryside

Constraints un

Located outside of existing settlement boundary and some distance from amenities

Develop

Single ownership. Currently leased. 

11‐15 years; 1

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Exclude 15% covered by Flood Risk Zone 3 Y Y N N N N N N N N N N Y N N Potentially Suitable

15% of site to be excluded due to Flood Risk Zone 3. Also 100% located within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Large site with significant environmental and policy constraints to overcome through plan‐making process. Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. Delivery rate likely to be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 491 491 Potentially achiev1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 38 163 ‐ 981 0 981 0 981

Case study: 70% Horsted Park (161.5 hrha), 30% Ryle Yard (442hr/ha) 15% of site within Flood Zone 3 excluded. 30% of site excluded due to need for access and open space on site.  

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC8 Call for Sites LP1148. LP661Anglo Aquatic Plant Co, Strayfield Road, Enfield

EN2 9JE Chase 2.65 Mixed use office, resideResidential Countryside and wooded area. 

Constraints un

Located some distance from amenities

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable100% in Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 344 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 344 0 344 0 344

Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 5 storeys80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHC9 Call for Sites LP148 Whitewebbs Rd EN2 9HW Chase 3.17 Dwelling and stables Residential Open countryside

Constraints un

Located some distance from amenities

DevelopSingle ownership

6‐10 years

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Exclude 15% covered by Flood Risk Zone 3 Y Y N N Y N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable

15% of site to be excluded due to Flood Risk Zone 3. Also 100% located within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. Also partially covered by Flood Risk Zone 2. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Unknown abnormal costs

Site with significant environmental and policy constraints to overcome through plan‐making process. Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. 

0 156 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 178 0 178 22 156

Case study: Goldsmith Street 80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.. 15% excluded due to level 1/2 constraints. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of Green Belt policy constraint. 

CHE11 Enfield Road WatchLP662Parking lot /garages behind houses on Brigadier Hill

‐ Chase 0.1 Petrol Station Residential Low density dwellings 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7Only the garages have been considered for redevelopment. Case study: South Chase Lot 3

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

CHP1 Planning Applicatio 20/00372/FUL Stable View Burnt Farm Ride Crews Hill EN2 9DY Chase 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Site with significant environmental and policy constraints to overcome. 

2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP10 Planning Applicatio 18/02987/FUL 3 Bulls Cross Enfield EN2 9HE Chase 0.13 Residential  Refused applic

n/a ‐ capacity estimate based on previous application

n/a ‐ capacity 

n/a ‐ capacity estimate based on previous application

As per previous application  None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 1 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable

Could be developed if acceptable response to previous application designed. Planning permission was refused on this site. And the permissison was also refused at appeal. However an alternative scheme may be able to come forward of an appropriate scale and appearance. 

CHP12 Planning Applicatio 18/03396/FUL New Cottage 501 The Ridgeway Enfield EN6 5QT Chase 0.35 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Conversion of existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 ‐1 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP14 Planning Applicatio 18/03608/FUL 1 And 2 North Lodge Cottages The Ridgeway ENQ 5QU Chase 0.19 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing utilities. 

None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 2 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP19 Planning Applicatio 19/01655/FULBarn Whitewebbs Farm Whitewebbs Road Enfield 

EN2 9HR Chase 0.35 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of 4nn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Site with significant environmental and policy constraints to overcome. 

4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP20 Planning Applicatio 19/01724/FUL 7B Golf Ride Enfield EN2 9DA EN2 9DA Chase 0.15 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP22 Planning Applicatio 19/02826/FUL Longbourn Forty Hill Enfield EN2 9EU EN2 9EU Chase 0.85 Residential  Mixed Use res

n/a ‐ capacity estimate based on previous application

n/a ‐ capacity 

n/a ‐ capacity estimate based on previous application

As per previous application  None known n/a

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable Based on existing uses.  n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Not developable within the ne

Scheme was refused as not considered suitable for small C1 use in isolation. A net increase of dwellings is not anticipated in this location. 

CHP23 Planning Applicatio 19/03265/FUL Celbic Hall 71‐77 Lancaster Road Enfield EN2 0DW Chase 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP26 Planning Applicatio 19/03564/FUL 2 Tudor Crescent Enfield EN2 0TU Chase 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP4 Planning Applicatio 17/05227/FUL 263 Bullsmoor Lane Enfield EN1 4SF Chase 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known.  26 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 27 1 26 0 26 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP5 Planning Applicatio 17/05528/FUL Kingswood Nurseries Bullsmoor Lane Enfield EN1 4SF Chase 0.69 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known.  55 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 56 1 55 0 55 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP7 Planning Applicatio 18/00421/FUL 94 Linwood CrescentEnfieldEN1 4UR EN1 4UR Chase 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 1 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHP9 Planning Applicatio 18/01950/FUL Land Adjacent To 37 Browning Road Enfield EN2 0EJ Chase 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

CHS16 SHLAA 2017/ ELAA 17100254Land At Waterworld, Bullsmoor Lane /Great Cambridge Road

‐ Chase 3.27 Non‐residential uses anUnknownEdge of urban area 

Access constra

Located outside of urban area and some distance from amenities

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

Y Partial N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable 50% of site located within Green Belt Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 200 0 0 Achievability Unk3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 77 ‐ ‐ 200 0 200 0 200

Case study: Ordnance Road80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

COC1 Call for Sites LP1120 Saracens ARFC, Green Rd N14 Cockfosters 0.33 Clubhouse and changinResidential Open space and residential

Open space

Lack of proximity to local amenities 

Develop

Site submitted by leaseholder. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable MOLViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses.  None known.  0 66 0 0 Potentially achiev5 Villa block 200 ‐ ‐ 66 0 66 0 66Case Study: Finsbury Park Villas. Height assumption: 6 storeys. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

COC10 Call for Sites LP608_6Cockfosters Terminus Railway Depot, Bramley Road, London

N14 4HX Cockfosters 16.57 Railway terminus depo Residential, emResidental and retail, train station

Green Belt lan

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Partial N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. Mixed use development proposed. 

UnknownPotential physical constraints from tube tracks. 

0 0 35 0 Achievability Unk‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 35 0 35 0 35

Proposed capacity based on submitted information by developer. Subject to further detailed consideration. 

Potentially developable

Subject to confirmation of viability. Large proportion of submitted site contains operational tube tracks, in use. Remainder of site can be considered developable. 

COC11 Call for Sites LP608_5Oakwood Station Car Park, Bramley Road, London 

N14 4UT Cockfosters 0.32 Car Park Residential, reMixed area near station 

Unknown con

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known.  None known.  0 0 44 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 137 ‐ ‐ 44 0 44 0 44Case study: Sutherland Road. Height assumption: 5 storeys. 

Developable n/a

COC12 Call for Sites LP1196 The Poplars N14 4HH Cockfosters 0.08 Amenity space Residential Suburban housing

None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known.  None known.  0 9 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 Case study: Ordnance Mews Developable n/a

COC2 Call for Sites LP1177 Rear of 1‐91 Westpole Avenue  EN4 0AY Cockfosters 0.42 Domestic Back gardensResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known. Potential access constraints. Ownership issue to be addressed. 

0 32 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 32 0 32 0 32Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

COC3 Call for Sites LP1178 Rear of 3‐43 The Fairway  EN4 0QW Cockfosters 0.17 Rear Gardens ResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known. Potential access constraints. Ownership issue to be addressed. 

0 20 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 20 0 20 0 20Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

COC4 Call for Sites LP1179 Rear of 2‐12 Addison Avenue N14 4AE Cockfosters 0.08 Rear Gardens ResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known. Potential access constraints.Trees on some plots. Ownership issue to be addressed. 

0 9 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

COC5 Call for Sites LP1180 Rear of 35‐49 Addison Avenue N14 4AL Cockfosters 0.09 Rear Gardens ResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known. Potential access constraints. Ownership issue to be addressed. 

0 10 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

COC6 Call for Sites LP1181 Rear of 51‐57 Addison Avenue  N14 4AJ Cockfosters 0.06 Garden / garages ResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known. Potential access constraints. Ownership issue to be addressed. 

0 7 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

COC7 Call for Sites LP1182 Rear of 17‐39 Hood Avenue N14 4QH Cockfosters 0.08 Garden / garages ResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Located within rear gardens

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

None known. Potential access constraints. Ownership issue to be addressed. 

0 9 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

COC8 Call for Sites LP465Land between Camlet Way and Crescent West, Hadley

‐ Cockfosters 11.05 Pasture / Grazing land Residential 

Open countryside. On edge of settlement in Green Belt. 

Unknown con

Located some distance from amenities

Develop None known. 11‐15 years

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

20% covered by Level 1 constraints Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableLocated within Green Belt. In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

None known. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 160 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 160 0 160 0 160 Based on developer submission Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

COC9a Call for Sites LP608_1Cockfosters Station Car Park (Parcel a) Cockfosters Road, Barnet

‐ Cockfosters 1.15 Car park Mixed use resiResidental and retail, train station

Adjacent to Gr

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Partial N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. Mixed use development proposed ‐ viability unknown. 

UnknownPhysical constraints from underground utilities. 

0 0 0 0 Achievable see COC9b see COC9b see COC9b see COC9b 0 0 0 0 0 see COC9b Developable see COC9b

COC9b Call for Sites LP608_1Cockfosters Station Car Park (Parcel b) Cockfosters Road, Barnet

‐ Cockfosters 0.22 Car park Mixed use resiResidental and retail, train station

Adjacent to Gr

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop. It is proposed that this site accommodates a residential led development with the potential for some retail/commerical uses to ground/lower floors, and includes flexibility to reprovide the existing London Underground accommodation space on site and removal of the existing commuter car park. Development on the site would be required to take a considered and sensitive approach to the impact upon the adjacent Green Belt.

None known. 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Partial N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. Mixed use development proposed ‐ viability unknown. 

UnknownPhysical constraints from underground utilities. 

0 316 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 316 0 316 0 316

Based on capacity of emerging  scheme (351). Revised down due to ongoing considerations to be addressed. 

Developable n/a

COP10 Planning Applicatio 20/03200/PRJBlackhorse Tower, Holbrook House And Churchwood House116 Cockfosters Road

EN4 0DY Cockfosters 1.25 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics around existing retained tower

None known.  200 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 200 0 200 0 200 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP11 Planning Applicatio 16/04631/FUL 16 Parkgate Crescent Barnet EN4 0NP Cockfosters 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP12 Planning Applicatio 16/05149/FUL 73A Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0NL Cockfosters 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP13 Planning Applicatio 17/00354/FUL13 And 15 Greenbrook Avenue Enfield North Barnet

EN4 0LS Cockfosters 0.15 n/a ‐ principle of devel Subdivision ofn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 ‐1 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP14 Planning Applicatio 17/00459/FUL 383 Cockfosters Road Barnet EN4 0JS Cockfosters 0.28 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  13 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12 1 11 ‐2 13 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP15 Planning Applicatio 17/01544/FUL 30 Fairgreen Enfield North Barnet EN4 0QS Cockfosters 0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP16 Planning Applicatio 17/01608/FUL 21 Fairgreen Enfield North Barnet EN4 0QS Cockfosters 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP18 Planning Applicatio 17/01951/FUL Marie Elana Westpole Avenue Barnet EN4 0BD Cockfosters 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 1 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP19 Planning Applicatio 17/02071/FUL 31 Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0LJ Cockfosters 0.26 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP2 Planning Applicatio 20/00353/FUL 397 Cockfosters Road Barnet EN4 0JS Cockfosters 0.24 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  11 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 11 0 11 0 11 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP20 Planning Applicatio 17/02323/FUL 381 Cockfosters Road Barnet EN4 0JS Cockfosters 0.28 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP21 Planning Applicatio 17/02699/FUL 40 Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0LJ Cockfosters 0.19 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

COP22 Planning Applicatio 17/03044/FUL 23 Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0LH Cockfosters 0.36 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 ‐7 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP23 Planning Applicatio 17/03363/FUL 80 Waggon Road Barnet EN4 0PP Cockfosters 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP24 Planning Applicatio 17/04014/FUL 51 Lancaster Avenue Barnet EN4 0ER Cockfosters 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP26 Planning Applicatio 17/04634/FUL 22 Beech Hill Barnet EN4 0JP Cockfosters 0.33 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP28 Planning Applicatio 17/05534/FUL 31 Beech Hill Barnet EN4 0JN Cockfosters 0.23 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP29 Planning Applicatio 18/00174/FUL 56 Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0NS Cockfosters 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP3 Planning Applicatio 20/00541/FUL 68 Reservoir Road London N14 4AX Cockfosters 0.86 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP30 Planning Applicatio 18/00577/FUL 19 And 21 Parkgate Avenue Barnet EN4 0NN Cockfosters 0.19 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP31 Planning Applicatio 18/00646/FUL32 Waggon Road And Land Rear Of 30 Waggon Road Barnet

EN4 0HL Cockfosters 0.38 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Infrastructure costs for developing new access road and utilities. 

None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP32 Planning Applicatio 18/00927/FUL 14 Lancaster Avenue Barnet EN4 0EX Cockfosters 0.12 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

None known. Located within urban area

As per previous application  None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 1 0 0 Achievable 1.2. House ‐ Detached ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 Based on previous application Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (The planning application was refused as the information provided is insufficient to assess its impact on the character and appearance of the surrounding area. The typology study assumes 1xdetached house)

COP35 Planning Applicatio 18/01916/FUL 10 Fairgreen Enfield North Barnet EN4 0QS Cockfosters 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Infrastructure costs for developing new access road and utilities. 

None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 ‐1 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP37 Planning Applicatio 18/02901/FUL 58 Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0NS Cockfosters 0.1 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

None known. Located within urban area

As per previous application  None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable 1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2Reduced density from previous application 

Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal : The proposed demolition of the existing dwelling and replacement with three dwellings would result in an unacceptable intensification of the site that would be out of character with the existing pattern of development and by virtue of its design, bulk and and mass would be over dominant within the streetscape. The typology study assumes 2 dwellings.)

COP39 Planning Applicatio 18/03088/FUL 42 Beech Hill Barnet EN4 0JP Cockfosters 0.29 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP40 Planning Applicatio 18/03217/FUL Rear Of 22 Covert Way Enfield North Barnet EN4 0LT Cockfosters 0.1 Rear garden  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Trees, access. Located within urban area

As per previous application None known n/a

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable Deemed unsuitable through previous application.  n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Not developable within the ne

Reason for refusal: The proposed family dwelling, by reason of the proposed siting, together within its scale and form would result in significant harm to the back land garden site and the character and appearance of the surrounding area

COP44 Planning Applicatio 18/03660/FUL 37 Lancaster Avenue Barnet EN4 0ER Cockfosters 0.09 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Trees Located within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 4 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4Reduced density from previous application 

Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The proposed demolition of the existing dwelling, and replacement‐built form including the proposed car parking area, by virtue of its design, massing, bulk and scale and loss of verdant character, is considered to result in an unacceptable form of development)

COP45 Planning Applicatio 18/03918/FUL 6 Kingwell Road Enfield North Barnet EN4 0HY Cockfosters 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP47 Planning Applicatio 18/04582/FUL 40 Beech Hill Barnet EN4 0JP Cockfosters 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 1 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP48 Planning Applicatio 18/04756/FUL 23 Beech Hill Avenue Barnet EN4 0LW Cockfosters 0.23 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 6‐10 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP49 Planning Applicatio 19/00733/FUL Alexandra Court London N14 4RE Cockfosters 0.27 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 3 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3Reduced density from previous application 

Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: Whilst officers acknowledge the proposal is an improvement from the original planning permission, officers have reservations regarding the constraints of the development location and do not consider this current proposal adequately overcomes the previous reasons for reason (specifically with regards to design and neighbouring amenity impacts on the occupants at Treganna Close).)

COP50 Planning Applicatio 19/01081/FUL 66 Beech Hill Barnet EN4 0JJ Cockfosters 0.26 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 1 0 0 Achievable 1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1Reduced density from previous application 

Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted.  (Reason for refusal: The development, with regard to the nature of the private amenity space provided, by way of the significant overlooking, poor outlook, overshadowing and lack of separation from adjoining residential uses would result in a form of accommodation that would be considered to give rise to issues of privacy and sense of enclosure to future residents)

COP51 Planning Applicatio 19/01176/FUL 2 Beech Hill Avenue Barnet EN4 0LW Cockfosters 0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Subdivsion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 1 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP52 Planning Applicatio 19/01383/FUL 23 De Bohun Avenue N14 4PU Cockfosters 0.09 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable 1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 Based on previous application Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The proposed development by reason of the size and scale of the built form, the number of units and habitable rooms proposed and its potential occupancy, would lend itself to an overdevelopment of the site at an excessive density that is considered incompatible with its location)

COP54 Planning Applicatio 19/01638/FUL 90 Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0NX Cockfosters 0.17 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 7 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 Based on previous application Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The proposed development fails to provide a suitable and appropriate dwelling mix in accordance with either the adopted Enfield Core strategy and Development Management Plan and the recent Strategic Housing Market Assessment (2015) commissioned by the Council w)

COP55 Planning Applicatio 19/01757/FUL 14 Beech Hill Avenue Barnet EN4 0LN Cockfosters 0.43 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 1 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP56 Planning Applicatio 19/02068/FUL 69 Lancaster Avenue Barnet EN4 0ER Cockfosters 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP57 Planning Applicatio 19/02145/FUL 41 Kingwell Road Enfield North Barnet EN4 0HZ Cockfosters 0.09 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 1 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 Based on previous application Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted.  (Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by reason of its size, height would be overly dominant and obtrusive when viewed from this neighbouring property)

COP58 Planning Applicatio 19/02276/FULOakwood Methodist Church Westpole Avenue Barnet

EN4 0BD Cockfosters 0.24 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  28 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 28 0 28 0 28 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP59 Planning Applicatio 19/02318/FUL 21 Broadgates Avenue Barnet EN4 0NU Cockfosters 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP61 Planning Applicatio 19/02727/FUL 117 Avenue Road London N14 4DN Cockfosters 0.08 Residential  Residential (WSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 5 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 Based on previous application DevelopableCould be developed if appropriate scheme submitted. 

COP62 Planning Applicatio 19/02830/FUL 39A Camlet Way Barnet EN4 0LJ Cockfosters 0.23 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 1 2 ‐1 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP63 Planning Applicatio 19/03566/FUL 66 Kingwell Road Enfield North Barnet EN4 0HY Cockfosters 0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of proximity to the Monken Mead Brook

End of road development ‐ restricted access. 

2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP64 Planning Applicatio 19/03625/FUL 11 Newmans Way Barnet EN4 0LP Cockfosters 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP66 Planning Applicatio 19/03744/FUL 45 De Bohun Avenue London N14 4PU Cockfosters 0.06 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The proposed conversion would fail to provide compensatory family accommodation with direct access to a rear garden. )

COP67 Planning Applicatio 19/03879/FUL 3 Beech Hill Avenue Barnet EN4 0LW Cockfosters 0.15 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 ‐1 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP68 Planning Applicatio 19/03885/FUL 3 And 4 Walmar Close Enfield EN4 0LA Cockfosters 0.22 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

Existing buildinLocated within urban area 

As per previous application None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 4 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The provision of six flats on the site of two existing dwellinghouses would represent an overdevelopment and intensification of the site)

COP69 Planning Applicatio 20/00102/FUL 15 Newmans Way Barnet EN4 0LP Cockfosters 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP70 Planning Applicatio 20/00251/OUT 64 Beech Hill Barnet EN4 0JJ Cockfosters 0.27 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP71 Planning Applicatio 16/01578/FUL New Avenue Estate, London N14 Cockfosters 4.26 n/a ‐ principle of devel Phased redeven/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  213 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 262 171 91 ‐122 213 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP72 Planning Applicatio 16/04324/FULFormer Middlesex University Trent Park Bramley Road

N14 4YZ Cockfosters 22.48 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Large site with significant environmental and policy constraints to overcome. 

262 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 408 0 408 146 262 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COP73 Planning Applicatio 16/04561/FUL 1 Coombehurst Close Enfield North EN4 0JU Cockfosters 0.23 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 1 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Completed April 2020

COP74 Planning Applicatio 18/00966/FULDairy House Middlesex University Bramley Road 

EN4 0PT Cockfosters 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Nearly completed

COP8 Planning Applicatio 16/00460/FUL 39 Lower Kenwood Avenue Enfield EN2 7LT Cockfosters 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

COS16 SHLAA 2017 17100116 Cockfosters Station EN4 0DZ Cockfosters 0.42 Station UnknownMixed area near station 

Operational unLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through infrastructure provider call for sites

Unknown n/aAvailable

N N N N N N N N NInclude n/a

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitableListed building on site. Not suitable for redevelopment. 

n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the neThe site is not suitable. It is the station building, which is a listed building. 

EDC2 Call for Sites LP1137 Edmonton Green Shopping Centre N9 0TZEdmonton Green

10 Large shopping centre, Higher densityMixed use town centre

Existing uses o

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop Unknown.  6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing uses. 

Potetntial leasehold ownership considerations to be addressed. Landowner has begun engaging relevant parties. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 586 586 631 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1804 17 1787 0 1804

Based on latest applicant's proposal. Subject to satisfactory resolution of ongoing planning considerations being discussed. 

Developablen/a ‐ a hybrid planning application has recently been submitted (20/04187/OUT)

EDE11 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Family Centre at 5, Lacey Close N97SAEdmonton Green

0.06 Family Centre Residential Mixed area near station 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission and the current use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 21 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 21 0 21 0 21

GEA=656sqm; NIA: 65%GEA=426; no. of dwellings=426/60sqm= 7 dwellings per floor. Height assumption: 3 additional floors  

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

EDE19 Enfield Road WatchLP662Over grown plot and car park at Jeremy’s Green

‐Edmonton Green

0.05 Car Park Residential Suburban Housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: Goldsmith Street Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

EDP10 Planning Applicatio 16/04184/RE4Maldon Road Car Park And Newstead House 19 Maldon Road London

N9 9QWEdmonton Green

0.26 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  11 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 21 0 21 10 11 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP11 Planning Applicatio 17/02209/FUL 361‐363 Fore Street London N9 0NREdmonton Green

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of a fn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP17 Planning Applicatio 17/05384/FULEdmonton Methodist Church 300 Fore Street London

N9 0PNEdmonton Green

0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Constrained by overlooking onto adjacent properties. 

12 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12 0 12 0 12 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP21 Planning Applicatio 18/02237/FUL Aberdeen Parade Angel Road London N18 2EBEdmonton Green

0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing housing

None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 ‐1 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP27 Planning Applicatio 19/00688/FUL 1, 2 And 2A Bridge Road London N9 0NNEdmonton Green

0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP30 Planning Applicatio 19/02011/FUL 12 Victoria Road London N18 2UFEdmonton Green

0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 2‐sn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing housing and flood mitigation measures

Constrained access from the main road due to retention of existing property. 

6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

EDP36 Planning Applicatio 19/03522/FUL 66 Church Street Edmonton N9 9PAEdmonton Green

0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Part change ofn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building, new access and utilities. 

None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP7 Planning Applicatio 16/02472/FUL 244 Fore Street London N18 2QDEdmonton Green

0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a 2n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 3 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EDP9 Planning Applicatio 16/04185/RE4Garages Adjacent To 43,47‐53 And Rear Of 17‐32 Gatward Green London

N9 9AWEdmonton Green

0.34 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 6‐10 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 9 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable n/a

EHC1 Call for Sites LP1144 Site next to Brimsdown Station Mollison Ave  EN3Enfield Highway

4.37 Various industrial, storaResidential‐ledMixed area near station 

None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown.

Multiple landowners. Not all landowners aware. 

15+ years

Not available

N N N N N N N N N

Exclude

Site withdrawn by promoter.  N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Not suitable Site withdrawn by promoter.  n/a n/a n/a Unachievable Not developable within the ne Site withdrawn by promoter. 

EHC4 Call for Sites LP1196 Ingersoll Road,  EN3 5PUEnfield Highway

0.05 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Potential access constraints. 0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 Case study: Ordnance Mews Developable n/a

EHP14 Planning Applicatio 17/02599/FULCommercial Premises 179 Hertford Road Enfield

EN3 5JHEnfield Highway

0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  25 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 25 0 25 0 25 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP15 Planning Applicatio 17/05371/FUL 48 Orchardleigh Avenue Enfield EN3 5BEEnfield Highway

0.08 Residential  Residential (reSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  n/a

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the ne

Not suitable for intensification (Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by reason of the inadequate floor area of the first and second floor flat, taken together with the sloping roof of the living area, which would further reduce the useable space, and the unclear amenity space provision for this flat, would result in an inappropriate subdivision, an over‐intensive use of the property and a cramped and poor standard of accommodation for future residents.)

EHP20 Planning Applicatio 18/01905/FUL 76 Ashford Crescent Enfield EN3 7HXEnfield Highway

0.04 Residential  C2 care home Suburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ deemed unacceptable

Not developable within the ne

Reason for refusal: The proposed assisted living facility with potential to accommodate 10 people and above by virtue of the associated activity and an over intensive use of the property would lead to an unacceptable increase in activity, general noise and disturbance associated with the proposed level of occupation which would detract from the residential character and amenities

EHP33 Planning Applicatio 18/04861/FUL Rear Of 44‐46 Green Street Enfield EN3 7HQEnfield Highway

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Subdivision ofn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building, new access and utilities. 

None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP34 Planning Applicatio PP‐08702265241 Green Street EN3 7SJ Enfield 

Highway0.45 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ suitable n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 100 48 0 0 Achievable principles of development a ‐ ‐ ‐ 148 0 148 0 148 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP36 Planning Applicatio 19/00090/FUL 220‐222 Hertford Road Enfield EN3 5BHEnfield Highway

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Part change ofn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 ‐2 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP39 Planning Applicatio 19/00471/FUL 2 Lansbury Road Enfield EN3 5NBEnfield Highway

0.06 Residential  Residential (Ren/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Available

N N N N N N N N N

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

n/a n/aPrevious permission indicated unacceptability of change of use. 

0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ change of use deemed unacceptable

Not developable within the ne

Not appropriate for redevelopment Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by virtue of the number of the occupants at the premises, would be an over intensive use of the property, leading to an unacceptable increase in activity, general noise and disturbance associated with the proposed level of occupation which would detract from the residential character and amenities enjoyed by the occupants of the neighbouring residential properties and the amenities of the future occupiers.

EHP40 Planning Applicatio 19/00646/FUL 19 Nursery Gardens Enfield EN3 5NGEnfield Highway

0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a pn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building. 

Constrained access from the main road due to retention of existing property. 

0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP42 Planning Applicatio 19/00988/OUT 10 Cedar Avenue Enfield EN3 7JBEnfield Highway

0.08 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing buildings on site

None known 0 1 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1Based on appropriate response to previous decision 

Developable

Could be deemed developable if appropriate response to previous application submitted. (Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by reason of inadequate floor areas, poor internal layouts and poor quality outlook would result in sub‐standard accommodation and the overdevelopment of the site, harmful to the amenities of future occupiers)

EHP43 Planning Applicatio 19/01716/FUL 419‐421 Hertford Road Enfield EN3 5PTEnfield Highway

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Partial demolitn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building. 

Constrained access from the main road due to retention of existing property. 

5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP50 Planning Applicatio 19/03360/FUL 427‐429 Hertford Road Enfield EN3 5PTEnfield Highway

0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 4 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

EHP61 Planning Applicatio 18/00486/FUL 42 Elmore Road Enfield  EN3 5PXEnfield Highway

0.0658 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Completed September 2020

EHP62 Planning Applicatio 18/01642/PRJUnits 2 To 3 Sovereign Business Centre 33 Stockingswater Lane Enfield 

EN3 7JXEnfield Highway

0.075 n/a ‐ principle of devel Prior approvaln/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Completed October 2020

EHP63 Planning Applicatio 19/01802/CEA 48 Ambleside Crescent Enfield  EN3 7LYEnfield Highway

0.025 n/a ‐ principle of devel Use of propertn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission DeliverableCertificate of lawful use.  Will record as completed in 2020/21

CFS149

Call for sites CFS149

Brimsdown Industrial Estate  EN3 7PX

Enfield Highway

28.8

Predominantly Industri

redevelopmen

SIL  Existing uses oAcceptable proximity to local services. 

mixed use residential 

CfS submitted on behalf of a consortium who control 44% of the site. Landownership and possible leasehold issues.

11‐15 years; 1

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N y N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableLocated within SIL and partially within Flood Zone 2

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. Proposals will require bespoke typologies, the viability of which has yet to be demonstrated as delivereable within the borough. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Would have to come forward as part of a larger masterplanned development. Land owner coordination and delivery of infrastructure would act as a delivery constraint. 

0 0 1302 2704 Achievability Unk4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 232 ‐ ‐ 4006 0 4006 0 4006

Case study: Burridge Gardens. Height assumption: 6 storeys80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developable

Site is located within SIL and partially within Flood Zone 2. Potentially developable subject to review of policy constraints and demonstration of viability. 

EHS49 SHLAA 2017 17100191 1‐32 Anemone Court EN3 7TQEnfield Highway

0.51 Residential  UnknownMixed area near station 

Existing resideLocated within urban area

Developed after original submission to GLA. Assumed no longer to be considered for redevelopment. 

n/a n/aNot available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ not assessed n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the neExcluded due to recent residential development on site. Assumed no longer available. 

ELC2 Call for Sites LP553Canal & River Trust, Enfield Lock, Ordnance Road, Enfield

EN3 6JG Enfield Lock 1.76 B1(c) commercial units Residen alEmMixed area Flood risk. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

60% located within flood risk zone N Y N N Y Y N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable60% in Level 1 constraints. 100% in Level 2 constraints

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Retention of boatyard and integration into residential development. 

Unknown.  0 30 0 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 30 0 30 0 30Based on information submitted by developer

Potentially developableSubject to overcoming flood risk considerations and demonstration of viability. 

ELC4 Call for Sites LP1196 Ferndale Road Garages  EN3 6DH Enfield Lock 0.08 Garages ResidentialLow density dwellings 

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/a 0 0 0 0 Not available due ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 ‐ Not developable within the neNot available due to safeguarding for Crossrail 2

ELC6b Call for Sites LP1196 Ramney Drive West EN3 6DU Enfield Lock 0.06 Car park / garages Residential Built up area Proximity to railway line. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Assumed viable  subject to Whole Plan Viability.  

No known abnormal costs. 

Unknown if Network Rail restrictions apply due to proximity to railway. Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 4 0 0Potentially achievable

3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

ELC6c Call for Sites LP1196 Ramney Drive South EN3 6HA Enfield Lock 0.08 Car park / garages Residential Built up area Potential access constraints. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Assumed viable  subject to Whole Plan Viability.  

No known abnormal costs. 

Unknown if Network Rail restrictions apply due to proximity to railway. Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 5 0 0Potentially achievable

3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

ELE10 Enfield Road WatchLP662Car parking and garages at South West end of Raynton Rd (25 x 25m) 

‐ Enfield Lock 0.14 Car Park & Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Assumed viable  subject to Whole Plan Viability.  

Potential relocation of sub‐station required. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 11 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 77 ‐ ‐ 11 0 11 0 11 Case study Ordnance Road Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

ELE15 Enfield Road WatchLP663Parking behind Ramney Drive X 1 long thin site

‐ Enfield Lock 0.05 Car Park Residential Suburban housing near station 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Unknown if Network Rail restrictions apply due to proximity to railway. Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 3 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

ELE16b Enfield Road WatchLP664Parking behind Ferndale Road long thin sites (South)

‐ Enfield Lock 0.06 Car Park Residential Suburban housing near station 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability.  

No known abnormal costs. 

Unknown if Network Rail restrictions apply due to proximity to railway. Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. Potential delivery constraints due to proximity to railway. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

ELE5 Enfield Road WatchLP665Space behind housing at Ordnance Rd/Hertford Rd junction (south side) 

‐ Enfield Lock 0.08 Vacant Land Residential  Mixed area Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability.  

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 7 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 102 66 7 0 7 0 750% mansion block 3 storeys (Paxton House) + 50% dual aspect mews (South Chase Lot 3)

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

ELP12 Planning Applicatio 17/02541/FUL Social Club 97 Ordnance Road Enfield EN3 6AG Enfield Lock 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  14 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 0 14 0 14 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

ELP37 Planning Applicatio 19/03022/FUL 59 Mandeville Road Enfield EN3 6SL Enfield Lock 0.06 Residential  Residential (reSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  n/a

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing buildings on site

None known 0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Not developable within the ne

No net gain in units on site achievable (Reason for refusal: The development provides a substandard quantum of retained external amenity space for the donor property No 59 and fails to provide direct access to private amenity spaces for future occupiers of the two flats, resulting in substandard level of living accommodation.)

ELP38 Planning Applicatio 19/03024/FUL 2 Ashton Road Enfield EN3 6DQ Enfield Lock 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs for noise mitigation due to the proximity to the railway tracks.  

Garden with mature trees.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 1 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

ELP4 Planning Applicatio 20/00379/FUL 1 Raynton Road Enfield EN3 6BP Enfield Lock 0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

ELP44 Planning Applicatio 19/04347/FUL 45 Rotherfield Road Enfield EN3 6AN Enfield Lock 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRC1 Call for Sites LP1105, LP652St Anne’s Catholic High School for Girls, Enfield

EN2 6EL Grange 1.76 School  Residential  Town centre Existing opera

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N Partial N N N N N Potentially suitable Playing fields are designated local open space. Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics around existing school. 

Amendments to utilities required.  0 236 0 0 Potentially achiev4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 168 ‐ ‐ 236 0 236 0 236

Case study: Harvard Gardens. Maximum height: 10 storeys80% of site assumed developable for residential due to need for access, open space etc. on site.

Potentially developable

Playing fields are designated local open space. Could be consdiered developable subject to confirmation of availability (i.e. relocation of school possible,) and review of designation of open space. 

GRC10 Call for Sites LP1188 10‐44 The Orchard  N21 2DH Grange 0.33 Housing ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown. 

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

Unknown. 

Land assembly of multiple ownerships will lengthen delivery timescales. Potential access constraints to consider, due to location. 

0 38 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 38 0 38 0 38Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

GRC11 Call for Sites LP1123 11 Bush Hill N21 2DB Grange 0.06 Rear garden ResidentialSuburban housing

Trees. Other c

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown. 

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 3 0 0 Potentially Achiev2. Cluster 43 ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 Case study: Essex Mews Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

GRC12 Call for Sites LP603 Palace Gardens Shopping Centre Enfield, EN2 6SN Grange 3.73 Shopping Centre Mixed Use Town centre Existing uses o

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Viability subject to information from developer to determine viability due to site size and mix of usesand Whole Plan Viability. 

Significant potential costs due to need for on site infrastructure. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 350 0 0 Potentially achiev‐ ‐ ‐ 350 0 350 0 350

Layout taken from pre‐application, but with an overall reduction in height. 4‐6 storeys for the lower blocks and 10 storeys for the central tower. 

Developable n/a

GRC13 Call for Sites LP608_3Enfield Town Station, Southbury Road, Enfield

EN1 1YX Grange 0.87 Station  Residential, re Town centre Operational Ra

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Enfield Town Station is leased to Rail for London Limited on a 125 year lease from Network Rail. Network Rail and other land owners who make up the wider site have not yet been made aware of this submission.

Unknown.  11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Information required from developer to determine viability due to site size. Also subject to Whole Plan viability. 

Significant potential costs due to operational railway station on site. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 100 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 35 0 35 ‐65 100

Only 0.260ha have been considered due to the constraints givn by the station building and tracks. Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption: 6 storeys

Developable n/a

GRC14 Call for Sites LP1196 Oxford Garden Garages N21 2AN Grange 0.07 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Potential over

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 8 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 Case study: Ordnance Mews Developable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

GRC15 Call for Sites LP1196 Roseneath Walk EN1 2AH Grange 0.06 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Potential over

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

GRC2 Call for Sites LP1114 126 Wades Hill, Winchmore Hill, London  N21 1EH Grange 0.31 Residential  Residential Mixed area Trees and acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 13 0 0 Achievable 2. Cluster 43 ‐ ‐ 13 0 13 0 13 Case study: Essex Mews Developable n/a

GRC3 Call for Sites LP1117, 20/02858/FUL 100 Church Street, Enfield EN2 6BQ Grange 0.28 The site was most rece Residential. LivTown centre Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Redevelopment of existing buildings. 

None known.  0 56 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block 200 ‐ ‐ 56 0 56 0 56 Case study: Finsbury Park Villas Developable n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio20/03903/PRJ, 20/04051 Ross House,Shirley Road EN2 6SB

Grange 0.15 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Include n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 42 0 0 0 Achievable principles of development a ‐ ‐ ‐ 24 0 24 0 24 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

GRC5 Call for Sites LP1124 103 Old Park Ridings  N21 2EJ Grange 0.1 Back garden land/Alley ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

Redevelopment of existing buildings. 

Lack of access to the main road, inbetween back to back dwellings, narrow strip  

0 10 0 0 Potentially Achiev5 Villa block 100 ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10Case Study: Finsbury Park Villas. Height assumption: 3 storeys. 

Developable n/a

GRC6 Call for Sites LP1164 Rear of 5‐27 Walsingham Road (odds) EN2 6EX Grange 0.21 Back garden land/Alley ResidentialSuburban housing

Vehicular acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs. Lack of access to the main road, inbetween back to back dwellings, narrow strip  

0 16 0 0 Potentially Achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 16 0 16 0 16Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

GRC7 Call for Sites LP1165 Rear of 29‐65 Uvedale Road (odds) EN2 6HB Grange 0.15 Back garden land/Alley ResidentialSuburban housing

Vehicular acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs. Lack of access to the main road, inbetween back to back dwellings, narrow strip  

0 12 0 0 Potentially Achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 12 0 12 0 12Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

GRC8 Call for Sites LP1176 917‐939 Green Lanes  N21 2PB Grange 0.11 Housing Residential Mixed area Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Site in multiple ownership. Intention of submission is to establish principle of development to encourage sites to come forward for development over the coming period

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

No known abnormal costs. Land assembly of multiple ownerships will lengthen delivery timescales.

0 8 0 0 Potentially Achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

GRC9 Call for Sites LP1187 3‐49 The Orchard  N21 2DJ Grange 0.28 Housing ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Viability of housing in other similar locations across borough established through consented and delivered applications. 

Unknown. 

Land assembly of multiple ownerships will lengthen delivery timescales. Potential access constraints to consider, due to location. 

0 22 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 22 0 22 0 22Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability

GRD1 Allocations/Opport Enfield Town Master P Magistrate's Court Building N21 Grange 0.14 Magistrates court Housing Mixed area Locally listed bWithin Town Centre

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the absence of planning permission and the existing use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 6 0 0 Potentially Achiev‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6

This is in the conservation area and the building is locally listed. Conversion approach adopted   GEA=602.5 sqm; NIA=65%GEA=392sqm; average dwelling (1B,2B) = 60sqm; 392/60=6dwellings

Potentially developableAvailability Unknown. Could be considered Developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRD2 Allocations/Opport Enfield Town Master P Land to the Rear of Magistrate's Court N21 Grange 0.08 Magistrates court Café, restauranMixed area Locally listed bWithin Town Centre

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

Potential abnormal costs to redevelop/repurpose listed building. 

Given the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. 

0 3 0 0 Potentially Achiev2. Cluster 43 ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 Case study: Essex Mews  Potentially developableAvailability Unknown. Could be considered Developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRD3 Allocations/Opport Enfield Town Master P Gladbeck Way Car Park N21 Grange 0.25 Car park Mixed use houMixed area None known. Within Town Centre

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the absence of planning permission and  the valued use it is not likely that this wouldbe delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 34 0 0 Potentially Achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 137 ‐ ‐ 34 0 34 0 34Case study: Sutherland Road. Height assumption: max 5 storeys

Potentially developableAvailability Unknown. Could be considered Developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRD4 Allocations/Opport Enfield Town Master P BT Exchange, Cecil Road N21 Grange 0.26 Non‐residential Use Housing.Mixed area in town centre

None known. Within Town Centre

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the absence of planning permission and  the valued use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. However there is an opportunity for the site to come forward in tandem with the adjacent Palace Gardens site. 

0 29 0 0 Potentially Achiev4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 113 ‐ ‐ 29 0 29 0 29Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption: 5 storeys (5/6 of case density study considered)

Potentially developableAvailability Unknown. Could be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRD6 Allocations/Opport Enfield Town Master P London Road Island N21 Grange 0.81 Mixed Use. Primarily reMixed useMixed area in town centre

None known. Within Town Centre

Unknown Unknown n/a Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

Overcoming legal ownership issues of existing buildings on site likely to affect costs. 

Given the multiple ownerships and absence of planning permission and  the valued use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 0 0 0 Unachievable n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 No scope for infill  Not developable within the ne Availability unknown. No scope for infill 

GRD7 Allocations/Opport Enfield Town Master P Genotin Road Corner N21 Grange 0.13 Car Park HousingMixed area in town centre

None known. Within Town Centre

Unknown Unknown 11‐15 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

Overcoming legal ownership issues of existing buildings on site likely to affect costs. 

Given the multiple ownerships and absence of planning permission and  the valued use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 0 17 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 130 ‐ ‐ 17 0 17 0 17Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 4 storeys (4/5 of case study density considered)

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRE20 Enfield Road WatchLP662 58‐60 Silver Street withSydney Road car park EN2 62S Grange 0.14 Car Park Residential Mixed area near station 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Attractive locality, close to town centre and with mixture of uses nearby. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 25 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 181 ‐ ‐ 25 0 25 0 25Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 4 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRE21 Enfield Road WatchLP662Multi storey car park incorporating Lidl – Sydney Road

N17 Grange 0.51 Car Park & Retail  Residential Mixed area near station 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown n/a Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Attractive locality, close to town centre and with mixture of uses nearby. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Costs associated with redevelopment of existing use and provision of temporary car parking. 

Given the absence of landowner intent, and the likelihood that the car parking will be required for ongoing store operations it is not considered that this is an achievable site. 

0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 ‐ Not developable within the ne Not developable due to unavailability

GRE28a Enfield Road WatchLP662 Garages at Waverley Road N17 Grange 0.11 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

GRP1 Planning Applicatio 20/00304/FUL 34 ‐ 38 Church Street Enfield EN2 6BA Grange 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a sn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP10 Planning Applicatio 17/00635/FUL 55 Cheyne Walk London N21 1DD Grange 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Subdivision ann/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP11 Planning Applicatio 17/01821/FULLand To Rear Of Springview Care Home, Fronting The Coppice 8‐10 Crescent Road Enfield

EN2 7BL Grange 0.23 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 2 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP12 Planning Applicatio 17/02072/FULGarages Adjacent To Wansbeck Court Waverley Road Enfield

EN2 7BS Grange 0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP14 Planning Applicatio 17/04016/FUL 8 Maxim Road London N21 1EX Grange 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP20 Planning Applicatio 18/01379/FUL Parking Adjacent To Tiptree Drive Enfield EN2 6TY Grange 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Adjacent to garden with mature trees. 

7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP21 Planning Applicatio 18/01481/FUL 6 Crescent Road Enfield EN2 7BL Grange 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP22 Planning Applicatio 18/01511/FULCommercial Premises 40 Church Street Enfield

EN2 6AZ Grange 0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP25 Planning Applicatio 18/03179/FUL 46 Eversley Park Road London N21 1JS Grange 0.06 Residential  Residential (reSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The proposed development by reason of its design, scale, bulk and the location of mass on the site boundary would constitute an over development of the site that would result in the introduction of an incongruous form of development out of keeping with and detrimental to the character and appearance of the area.)

GRP26 Planning Applicatio 18/03391/FUL Salisbury Court 69 London Road Enfield EN2 6ER Grange 0.14 Residential  Residential (reSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 3 0 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 Potential roof extension Potentially developable

Could be considered developable subject to satisfactory amendment in response to previous refusal.  (Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by reason of its inappropriate size, bulk, massing, height and detailed design would result in an overly dominant, incongruous and unduly prominent form of development which would harm the character and appearance of the host building and the local streetscape)

GRP28 Planning Applicatio 18/04771/FUL 27 Eversley Crescent London N21 1EL Grange 0.31 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP30 Planning Applicatio 19/00004/FUL 1 Onslow Gardens London N21 1EA Grange 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 1 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP31 Planning Applicatio 19/00017/FULLand End, 18 And Bush Hill Cottage, 20 Bush Hill London

N21 2BX Grange 0.54 Residential  Refused applicSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 32 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 32 0 32 0 32Only three villa blocks instead of four to improve outlook and minimise overlooking. 

Developable

Could be developed if appropriate response to previous decision submitted. (Reason for refusal: The close proximity between the four (4) residential blocks results in a substandard and unacceptbale relationship between the proposed residential units resulting in harmful overlooking between primary windows of habitable rooms and between external private amenity space.)

GRP33 Planning Applicatio 19/00277/FUL 144 Wades Hill London N21 1EH Grange 0.09 Residential  Residential (ReSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  n/aAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 1 ‐1 ‐1 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Not developable within the neRefused application did not lead to net increase of units. Assumed no capacity to deliver additional homes. 

GRP35 Planning Applicatio 19/01329/FUL 151 Green Dragon Lane N21 1EN Grange 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP41 Planning Applicatio 19/02728/FUL 1A Bazile Road London N21 1HD Grange 0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP43 Planning Applicatio 19/03008/FUL 110 Bush Hill London N21 2BS Grange 0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 1 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP45 Planning Applicatio 19/03604/FUL 28 Deepdene Court London N21 2NH Grange 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs for flood mitigation measures.  

End of road development ‐ restricted access. 

2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP46 Planning Applicatio 19/03769/FUL 38 Uplands Way London N21 1DT Grange 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP47 Planning Applicatio 16/05960/FUL 124 Old Park Ridings London N21 2EP Grange 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 1 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable19/04133/FUL refused replaced it with 16/05960/FUL

GRP48 Planning Applicatio 19/04269/FUL Broyle Gate 17 Quakers Walk London N21 2DE Grange 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP49 Planning Applicatio 20/00117/FUL 109 Park Avenue Enfield EN1 2BD Grange 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a 2n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Constrained access from the main road due to retention of existing property. 

2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP5 Planning Applicatio 16/03477/FUL 1 Old Park Grove Enfield EN2 6PW Grange 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Subdivision sitn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Constrained access from the main road due to retention of existing property. 

1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP50 Planning Applicatio 20/00235/FUL 2A Green Dragon Lane London N21 2LD Grange 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a pn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP6 Planning Applicatio 16/04313/PRJ 1 – 2 Clock Parade London Road  Enfield  EN2 6JG Grange 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP7 Planning Applicatio 16/04769/FUL Unit 3‐6 Clock Parade London Road Enfield EN2 6JG Grange 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 2nn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRP8 Planning Applicatio 16/05330/FUL 2 Hartland Close London N21 2BG Grange 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs for flood mitigation measures.  

Site with policy constraints to overcome. 

1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

GRS1 SHLAA 2017 17100015 52 Sydney Road EN2 6SZ Grange 0.37 Residential  UnknownMixed area near station 

Existing resideLocated within urban area

Developed after original submission to GLA. Assumed no longer to be considered for redevelopment. 

Unknown n/aNot available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ not assessed n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the neAssumed no longer available due to recently completed residential development on site

GRS7 SHLAA 2017 17100003 1‐6 Clock Parade EN2 6JG Grange 0.34 Existing parade of shopUnknown 

Suburban housing ‐ designated local centre

Mature trees oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a ‐ located within designated local centre

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers.

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential legal constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 44 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 130 ‐ ‐ 44 0 44 0 44Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 4 storeys (4/5 of case study density considered)

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and acceptability of viable proposal on land. 

GRS8 SHLAA 2017 17100267 52 London Road EN2 6EN Grange 0.34 Convent UnknownMixed area near station 

Existing conveLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

Unknown.Potential construction logistics constraints due to backland nature of development. 

0 43 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 162 ‐ ‐ 43 0 43 0 43

Conversion and erection of a new 4 storey linear block to the back. CONVERSION: Existing GEA=1781 sqm; NIA= GEA‐35%GEA=1157sqm; 1157/60sqm=19 dwellings. NEW BUILT: Case study: Ryle Yard (4/5 of case study density considered). Only 0.15ha considered for new built

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and acceptability of viable proposal on land. 

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

HAE5 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Car parking space at Wyldefield Gardens ‐ Haselbury 0.05 Car Park  Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 2 0 0 Achievable 2. Cluster 43 ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 Case study: Essex Mews Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

HAE6 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Garages and adjacent space at Cedars Court ‐ Haselbury 0.07 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown, potential mulitiple ownerships and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 5 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

HAP3 Planning Applicatio 16/00097/FUL 27 Latymer Road London N9 9PF Haselbury 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HAP8 Planning Applicatio 18/01282/FUL 73A Church Street London N9 9PY Haselbury 0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion ann/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HAP9 Planning Applicatio 18/02422/FUL 254 Church Street London N9 9HQ Haselbury 0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 3‐sn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Constrained access from the main road due to retention of existing property. 

9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIC10 Call for Sites LP642 Land opposite Jolly Farmers EN2 Highlands 1.7 Predominantly used as Care home / faOpen countryside

Site divided by

Located some distance from amenities

Develop to care home  Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Approx 5% constrained by Flood Zone 3 Y Y N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 75% of site constrained by Flood Risk Zone 2

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Significant information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 89 0 89 89 0

Case study: Goldsmith Street10% of site covered by Level 1 constraints. 70% of site assumed developable taking into consideration need for road/open space infrastructure etc. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

HIC11 Call for Sites LP707Chase Park ‐ AKA Vicarage Farm, Land between Hadley Road & Enfield Rd

EN2 Highlands 140.56 Livery yard and vacant/Residential Open countryside

Sloping site, ac

Located some distance from amenities

Develop Unknown 11‐15 years; 1

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Approx 5% constrained by Flood Zone 3 Y Y N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 5% of site constrained by Flood Risk Zone 2

Significant information required to determine viability due to site size. 

Significant information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 1500 1500 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 38 83 162 3330 0 3330 330 3000

Case study: 50% semidetached (Horsted Park) + 40% terraces (Goldsmith Street) + 10% linear block (Ryle Yard)10% of site excluded due to Level 1 constraints. Net developable area assumed as 70% to account for need for road/open space infrastructure etc. 

Potentially developableNow referred to as Chase Park. Potentially developable subject to policy constraints. 

HIC1a Call for Sites LP069 Chase Farm Hospital, 127 The Ridgeway  EN2 8JL Highlands 0.23 Hospital grounds Residential / eMixed area None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known.  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% located within Green BeltViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 19 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 19 0 19 0 19 Case study: Goldsmith Street Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to viability and policy constraints. 

HIC5 Call for Sites LP1143 Rectory Farm EN2 8AB Highlands 5.87 Both sites are compriseResidential Open countryside

Turkey Brook 

Located some distance from amenities

Develop Unknown 11‐15 years; 1

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N Y N N Potentially suitable100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Significant information required to determine viability due to site size. 

Significant information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 251 251 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 503 0 503 0 503

Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption: 5 storeysNet developable area assumed as 70% to account for need for road/open space infrastructure etc. 

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to policy constraints. 

HIC6 Call for Sites LP1153 Bramley Road, London N14 4UW Highlands 5.63 Equestrian and residenA mix of 339 cOpen countryside

Conservation a

Located some distance from amenities

Develop to care village Unknown 11‐15 years; 1

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. Partially located within Conservation area. 

Significant information required to determine viability due to site size. 

Significant information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 536 0 536 536 0

Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption: 5 storeys. Net developable area assumed as 70% to account for need for road/open space infrastructure etc. 

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to policy constraints. 

HIC7 Call for Sites LP464 Royal Chace Hotel 162 The Ridgeway, Enfield EN2 8AR Highlands 1.77 Existing Hotel Use Residential ‐ POpen countryside

Adjoining but 

Located some distance from amenities

Redevelop

Company unrestricted ownership of site

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Significant information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size and care home proposal. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 128 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 128

Based on information submitted by developer. A ratio of 1.8 care home bed spaces = 1 dwelling has been applied in line with the Housing Delivery test. 

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to viability and policy constraints. 

HIC8 Call for Sites LP488Land west of The Ridgeway and Fairview Road, Gordon Hill, Enfield

EN2 8HJ Highlands 4.75 Grazing land and wood Residential Open countryside

Heavily woode

Located some distance from amenities

Redevelop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 105 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 105 0 105 0 105Case study: Goldsmith StreetAssume developable area of 1.27ha due to TPOs. 

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to viability and policy constraints. 

HIC9 Call for Sites LP623 Land south of Enfield Road ‐ Highlands 13.28 Greenfield site Residential Open countryside

None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop Unknown 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable100% located within Greenbelt, and Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Significant information required to determine viability due to site size. 

Significant information required on required infrastructure to determine viability due to site size. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 0 0 Potentially achiev3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 130 ‐ 988 0 988 0 0

Case study: 50% terraces (Goldsmith)+ 50% 4 storey linear block (Ryle Yard)Assumes 70% developable site area. 

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to viability and policy constraints. 

HIE12a Enfield Road WatchLP662 Crofton Way – Garages sites ‐ Highlands 0.15 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown, potential mulitiple ownerships and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 3 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3

Only 0.05ha considered for development due to access constraints. Case study: South Chase Lot 3

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to viability and policy constraints. 

HIE21b Enfield Road WatchLP6622 x garages sites north and south of Bycullah Road (north end of)

‐ Highlands 0.14 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown, potential mulitiple ownerships and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 9 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

HIP1 Planning Applicatio 20/00149/FUL 128 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8JN Highlands 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP10 Planning Applicatio 17/03711/FUL 13 Oak Avenue Enfield EN2 8LB Highlands 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP15 Planning Applicatio 18/01323/FUL Garages Rear Of 7 Bycullah Road Enfield EN2 8EG Highlands 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a tn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP16 Planning Applicatio 18/01539/FUL 70A And 72 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8JB Highlands 0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP18 Planning Applicatio 18/02638/FUL 1 Chasewood Avenue Enfield EN2 8PT Highlands 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP19 Planning Applicatio 18/02706/FUL 9 Ridgemount Gardens Enfield EN2 8QL Highlands 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP20 Planning Applicatio 18/03845/FUL 20, 22, 24 And 26 Drapers Road Enfield EN2 8LU Highlands 0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Partial demolitn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP24 Planning Applicatio 19/00590/FUL The Oaks 8 Bycullah Road Enfield EN2 8EQ Highlands 0.32 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of pan/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties and residents' parking.

8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP26 Planning Applicatio 19/00901/FUL 1‐44 Avalon Close EN2 8LR Highlands 0.41 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of a pn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties and residents' parking.

8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP27 Planning Applicatio 19/01044/FUL 79 Windmill Hill Enfield EN2 7AF Highlands 0.39 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Adjacent to gardens with mature trees.

0 49 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 49 0 49 0 49 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable n/a

HIP29 Planning Applicatio 19/01588/FUL 22 Worlds End Lane London N21 1PP Highlands 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 1 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP30 Planning Applicatio 19/02143/FUL 11 Hadley Road Enfield EN2 8JT Highlands 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 1 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP32 Planning Applicatio 19/02373/FUL 51 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8PF Highlands 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP33 Planning Applicatio 19/02954/FUL 3 Uplands Park Road Enfield EN2 7PU Highlands 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 1 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP34 Planning Applicatio 19/03767/FUL Butterfield House 25 Bycullah Road Enfield EN2 8EZ Highlands 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Single storey rn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties and residents' parking.

4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP5 Planning Applicatio 17/00549/FUL 1‐64 Hansart Way Enfield EN2 8NB Highlands 0.59 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties and residents' parking.

8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP6 Planning Applicatio 17/01604/FUL 41 The Ridgeway Enfield EN2 8PD Highlands 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

HIP9 Planning Applicatio 17/02775/FUL Comfort Hotel 52 Rowantree Road EN2 8PW Highlands 0.16 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  10 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

JUE5 Enfield Road WatchLP662Car parking space and garages at Elmsworth Close

‐ Jubilee 0.1 Car Park & Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable In close proximity to Flood Zone 2

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

JUE6 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Car parks at St Joseph’s Road ‐ Jubilee 0.11 Car Park Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 9 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 Case study: Goldsmith Street Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

JUP11 Planning Applicatio 18/04792/PRJ 2B Mottingham Road London N9 8DY Jubilee 0.08 Office Residential WiSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area

As per previous application  None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 1 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1n/a ‐ based on acceptable amendment to previous application

Developable n/a

JUP13 Planning Applicatio 19/00278/FUL 329 Hertford Road London N9 7ET Jubilee 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  16 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 16 0 16 0 16 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

JUP14 Planning Applicatio 19/00525/FUL 26 Woodstock Crescent London N9 7LY Jubilee 0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of twn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

JUP8 Planning Applicatio 18/02838/FULSunbridge Nursing Home 108 Hickory Close London

N9 7PZ Jubilee 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a 2n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

JUS5 SHLAA 2017 17100145Land at Lincoln Road and Great Cambridge Road

 EN1 1SW Jubilee 0.41 Hotel  Unknown Industrial estate

Existing uses o

Located within urban area; but not within established residential area ‐ some distance from amenities.

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA through call for sites Unknown  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N Y N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Located within SILViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Would have to come forward as part of a larger masterplanned development. Land owner coordination and delivery of infrastructure would act as a delivery constraint. 

0 133 0 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 324 ‐ ‐ 133 0 133 0 133 Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 10 storeys Potentially developable

Site is located within SIL. Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability, policy constraints and viability. 

JUS9 SHLAA 2017 17100253 Land At Rear Of 93‐125 St. Edmunds Road, N9 7PS Jubilee 0.48 Residential  UnknownSuburban area

n/a ‐ not assesn/a ‐ not assessed

Developed after original submission to GLA. Assumed no longer to be considered for redevelopment. 

n/a n/aNot available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ not assessed n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the neExcluded due to recent residential development on site. Assumed no longer available. 

LOC1 Call for Sites LP1108Chiswick Road Estate (Osward and Newdales) 

N9Lower Edmonton

2.37 Housing Estate Residential  Mixed area Existing housin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop None known.  11‐15 years

Available

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Partly in Flood Risk 3 N N N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 5% in Flood Zone 2Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Additional costs of relocation of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. Extensive consultation with existing residents would be required, as well as decant housing for existing residents to be completed. A ballot would also be required. 

0 0 272 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 425 153 272 0 272

The full redevelopment could potentially deliver 425 dwellings. The infill option would suggest 22 homes only. 

Developable n/a

LOC3 Call for Sites LP1196 Logan Rd N9 0LPLower Edmonton

0.07 Open Space Residential Suburban housing

Trees on site. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known.  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% in Flood Zone 2Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Unknown.  None known. 0 8 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 171 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8Case study: Chobman Manor. Height assumption: 5 storeys (5/6 of case density study considred)

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to overcoming Flood Risk constraints. 

LOP17 Planning Applicatio 18/03132/FULVacant Land To The Rear Of 120 Bury Street London

N9 7JRLower Edmonton

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a tn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building. 

Restricted access to site  via undercroft. 

1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

LOP18 Planning Applicatio 18/03680/FUL William Court 190 Hertford Road N9 7HHLower Edmonton

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 ‐1 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

LOP20 Planning Applicatio 19/00043/FUL 434 Montagu Road London N9 0ERLower Edmonton

0.31 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs due to flood mitigation measures

None known.  0 55 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 55 0 55 0 55 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable n/a

LOP23 Planning Applicatio 19/02273/PRJ 185 Town Road Edmonton London N9 0HLLower Edmonton

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 6 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

LOP8 Planning Applicatio 17/04699/PRP Land Adjacent To 1 Lowden Road London N9 8RLLower Edmonton

0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

LOP9 Planning Applicatio 18/00490/FUL St Edmunds Church 115 Hertford Road N9 7ENLower Edmonton

0.48 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAC39 Call for Sites LP654 Sainsburys Green Lanes N21 3RSWinchmore Hill

2.2 Supermarket + car parkMixed use inclSuburban housing

Trees and ope

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop None known  6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Close to existing housing. Known cost factor dependencies. Viablility to be determined subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing uses on site. Redevelopment of site will be contingent on addressing needs of existing operational store. 

0 299 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 299 0 299 0 299

Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption is 5‐6 storeysAssumed 50% of floor area for residential and 50% for employment. 

Developable n/a

PAC2 Call for Sites LP1128 377 North Circular Road N13 5UUPalmers Green

0.2 Watermelon storage/d Residential an Mixed area Existing uses o

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop for mixed useNone known. Single freeholder. 

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N Y Y N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% within LSIS and Flood Risk Zone 2Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Additional costs of relocation/decanting of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Adjacent to garden with mature trees. 

0 24 0 0 Achievability Unk4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 171 ‐ ‐ 24 0 24 0 24

Case study: Chobman Manor. Height assumption: 5 storeys (5/6 of case density study considered). Assumed 30% of floor area provided for employment uses. 

Potentially developable

Located within LSIS. Could be considered for residential, subject to assessment for employment requirements. Viability of mixed use development would also require demonstration. 

PAC3 Call for Sites LP1160, LP575 173‐185 Green Lanes N13 4QXPalmers Green

0.14 Shops with residential  Residential Located on mixed use high street

Potential acce

Close proximity to local amenities 

Comprehensive redevelopmentLeaseholders in situ

0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable 75% located within Flood Zone 2.Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Additional costs of relocation of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Potential access constraints.  0 23 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 23 0 23 0 23Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 4‐5 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to satisfactorily addressing flood risk. 

PAC4 Call for Sites LP1169 Rear of 16‐64 Devonshire Road (evens)  N13 4QXPalmers Green

0.15 Garages ResidentialSuburban housing

Site submitted

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known 0 4 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 4 0 4 0 4

Only the southern end considered for development due to the contraints given by the numerous mature trees (0.036 ha). Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

PAC5 Call for Sites LP1173 2‐22 Ecclesbourne Gardens N13 5JBPalmers Green

0.09 Rear Gardens Residential Suburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 85% of site covered by level 2 constraintsAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  Includes garden with mature trees.  0 10 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 10 0 10 0 10Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

PAC7 Call for Sites LP1175 178‐208 Green Lanes N13 5EUPalmers Green

0.13 Rear gardens Residential  Unknown. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known 0 10 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

PAC8 Call for Sites LP656Travis Perkins Palmers Green, Bridge Drive, Broomfield Lane

N13 4EUPalmers Green

0.62 Builders Merchant Expanded empMixed area Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known.  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Additional costs of relocation of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 76 0 0 Potentially achiev4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 174 ‐ ‐ 76 0 76 0 76

Case study: Brentford Lock West (Block E and F). Height assumption: 7 storeysAssumed 30% of floor area provided as employment uses. 

Potentially developableProposed for mixed use development. To be assessed separately for employment uses. 

PAD2 Allocations/Opport North Circular AAP (Sit Green Lanes north ‐Palmers Green

0.08 Garage Housing Mixed area Located withinAdjacent to local centre 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability UnknowPartial N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

Potential decontamination costs.

Given the absence of planning permission and the existing use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. 

0 10 0 0 Potentially Achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 130 10 0 10 0 10Case study: Rylw Yard. Height assumption: 4 storeys (4/5 of case study density considered)

Potentially developableAvailability Unknown. Could be considered Developable subject to confirming availability. 

PAP17 Planning Applicatio 18/03659/FULHoneysuckle House 1A Oakthorpe Road London

N13 5HYPalmers Green

0.38 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 45 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 45 0 45 0 45 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable18/03659/FUL application still in progress. Committee was in June 2019.

PAP18 Planning Applicatio 18/03790/FUL 196‐198 Green Lanes London N13 5UEPalmers Green

0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP20 Planning Applicatio 18/04077/FUL 327‐329 Green Lanes London N13 4TYPalmers Green

0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP21 Planning Applicatio 18/04261/FULLand At Rear Of  265‐267 Green Lanes London

N13 4XEPalmers Green

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP23 Planning Applicatio 18/04667/PIP Garages Devonshire Close London N13 4QTPalmers Green

0.05 Garages Residential deSuburban housing

None known Located within urban area

As per previous application  None known  6‐10 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development not deemed unacceptable through previous applications

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable 2. Cluster ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2Based on appropriate response to previous decision 

Developable n/a

PAP25 Planning Applicatio 18/04953/FUL Exchange Garages Trade Close London N13 5UDPalmers Green

0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties. 

8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP3 Planning Applicatio 17/01456/FUL Equitis House 23 ‐ 25 Aldermans Hill N13 4YDPalmers Green

0.01 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP38 Planning Applicatio 20/00203/FUL Public House 295 Green Lanes London N13 4XSPalmers Green

0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building. 

None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP4 Planning Applicatio 17/01882/PRJ 273 Green Lanes London N13 4XEPalmers Green

0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP5 Planning Applicatio 17/03634/FUL Public House 413 Green Lanes London N13 4JDPalmers Green

0.24 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  44 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 54 0 54 10 44 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAP8 Planning Applicatio 18/00480/FUL 371 ‐ 375 North Circular Road London N13 5JJPalmers Green

0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Reconfiguration/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

PAS10 SHLAA 2017 17100432 Green Lanes And North Circular ‐Palmers Green

0.26 Supermarket + car parkUnknown Mixed area Existing uses oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA by LBE Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Partially located within Flood Zone 2Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential legal constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 47 0 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 181 ‐ ‐ 47 0 47 0 47 Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 6 storeys Potentially developable

Site is located within Flood Risk Zone 2. Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability and acceptable design/mitigation for flood risk constraints. 

PGG1 Public Sector Land LP662Unit 3 C & D, Regents Avenue Industrial Estate

N13Palmers Green

0.33 Industrial  Estate UnknownIndustrial estate

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N Y Y N N N N N N N N N N Potentially Suitable

Located wholly within Flood Zone 2 and Locally Significant Industrial Site designation. Could be suitable subject to satisfactory flood risk mitigation, and policy designation removal. 

Known cost factor dependencies. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Costs of redevelopment of existing building and relocation of existing uses. 

Legal constraint unknown. Based on typology, assumed leasehold constraints to be overcome. In addition, given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 0 58 0 Achievability Unk4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 174 ‐ ‐ 58 0 58 0 58Case study: Brentford Lock West (Block E and F). Height assumption: 7 storeys

Potentially developable

Could be considered developable subject to change in policy consideration and confirmation of viability. However, site likely to be used to intensify industrial capacity. 

POC1 Call for Sites LP1134 Car Park High Street ‐ Ponders End 0.25 Car Park Residential  Mixed area None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aClose proximity to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 25 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 98 ‐ ‐ 25 0 25 0 25Case study: Hammond Court. Height assumption: 4 storeys (4/5 of case study density)

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to demonstration of achievability. 

POC2 Call for Sites LP1139 Alma Road Open Space  EN3 7BB Ponders End 2.64 Open Space Care home Mixed area None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% of site in designated MOLClose proximity to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential costs of utilities infrastructure to serve greenfield site. 

Trees around site may constrain delivery. 

0 0 310 0 Potentially achiev4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 168 ‐ ‐ 310 0 310 0 310Case study: Harvard Gardens. Maximum height: 10 storeys

Potentially DevelopableCould be considered developable subject review of to Local Open Space policy constraints. 

TBC

Planning Applicatio PP‐08640824, LP550

41‐52 Gilda Avenue EN3 7UJ

Ponders End 0.27 Residential 

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

Mature trees bn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 0 49 0 0 Achievable principles of development a ‐ ‐ ‐ 49 ‐ 49 ‐ 49

n/a ‐ based on live application. The SHLAA estimate for the previous call for sites estimated approximately 54 homes. 

Developable

POC4 Call for Sites LP567Redburn Industrial Estate, Woodall Road, Enfield

EN3 4LE Ponders End 0.76 Industrial units surrounResidentialIndustrial estate

Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Submitted by leaseholder for development.

Freehold interest – London Borough of Enfield.Leasehold interest: Legal & General Property Partners (Industrial Fund) Limited and Legal & General Property Partners (Industrial) Nominees 

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% located within SILViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Additional costs of relocation of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Potential access constraints for delivery of housing arising from proximity to  industrial uses within SIL. 

0 127 0 0 Potentially Achiev4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 168 ‐ ‐ 127 0 127 0 127Case study: Harvard Gardens. Maximum height: 10 storeys

Potentially DevelopableSubject to SIL designation. Land to be assessed for intensified employment need as well. 

POC6 Call for Sites LP1196 Land at former Wessex Hall Building EN3 7TU Ponders End 0.38 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Unknown con

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Unknown. Infill delivery around existing estate may add additional constraints. 

0 110 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 110 0 110 0 110Based on emerging pre‐application discussions. 

Developable n/a

POC8 Call for Sites LP1196 Kennedy Avenue Enfield EN3 4PB Ponders End 0.09 Garages Residential Suburban housing

None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known. Infill delivery around existing estate may add additional constraints. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 2. Cluster 43 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: Essex mews Developable n/a

POC9 Call for Sites LP1196 South Place Garages EN3 4LA Ponders End 0.06 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Trees on site. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Unknown. Trees around site may constrain delivery. 

0 3 0 0 Achievable 2. Cluster 43 3 0 3 0 3 Case study: Essex mews Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to demonstration of viability and review of SIL designation. 

POP1 Planning Applicatio 18/02919/FUL 382 Southbury Road EN3 4JJ Ponders End 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP16 Planning Applicatio 18/03939/FUL 26A Derby Road EN3 4AW Ponders End 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Constrained by overlooking from/into adjacent properties. 

4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP19 Planning Applicatio 19/00111/OUT Public House 1 High Street EN3 4EJ Ponders End 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Subdivision ofn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP24 Planning Applicatio 19/01360/FUL 206 Nags Head Road EN3 7AS Ponders End 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP28 Planning Applicatio 19/01706/PRJ Lincoln House Lincoln Road Enfield EN3 4AH Ponders End 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP30 Planning Applicatio 19/01976/FUL 265 High Street Enfield EN3 4DW Ponders End 0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 1 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP36 Planning Applicatio 19/03748/FULThe Goat 250 High Street Enfield

EN3 4HB Ponders End 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing building. 

None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP37 Planning Applicatio 19/04148/FUL 8‐8A Colmore Road Enfield EN3 7AL Ponders End 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP6 Planning Applicatio 16/03766/PRJ 52 Alexandra Road EN3 7EH Ponders End 0.01 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 6‐10 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

No known abnormal costs. Site with significant policy constraints to overcome ‐ LSIS

0 6 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POP7 Planning Applicatio 16/05682/FUL 1‐40 Robin Hall Gardiner Close EN3 4LP Ponders End 0.8 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 58 40 18 18 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Not developable within the ne Already delivered

POP9 Planning Applicatio 17/02116/FUL Thanet House 101 Nags Head Road EN3 7AB Ponders End 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of ann/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties. 

2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

POS29 SHLAA 2017 17100262 318 Lincoln Road EN1 1JU Ponders End 0.26 Car wash and car parkinUnknown Mixed area Potential acceLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing buildings. Potential unknown costs as a result of proximity to railway. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 30 0 0 Achievability Unk3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual aspect 115 ‐ ‐ 30 0 30 0 30 Case study: Ordnance Mews Potentially DevelopablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

POS43 SHLAA 2017 17100163 Peerglow Estate EN3 4SA Ponders End 0.68 Industrial warehouses  Unknown Industrial estate

Existing uses o

Located within urban area; but not within established residential area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA as part of development capacity sites

Unknown ‐ assumed multiple leases

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Located within LSISViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential legal constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 86 0 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 181 ‐ ‐ 86 0 86 0 86

Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 6 storeysAssumed 30% of GIA used to reprovide employment floorspace

Potentially Developable

Site is located within LSIS. Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability and acceptable design for mixed use. 

POS44 SHLAA 2017 17100234 Hertford Road High Street ‐ Ponders End 0.34 Mixture of uses includi Unknown Mixed area Existing uses oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA by LBE

Unknown ‐ assumed multiple leases

11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential legal constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 62 0 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 181 ‐ ‐ 62 0 62 0 62 Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 6 storeys Potentially Developable

Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

POS45 SHLAA 2017 17100334 Queensway ‐ Ponders End 1.03 Industrial warehouses  Unknown Industrial estate

Existing uses o

Located within urban area; but not within established residential area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA as part of development capacity sites

Unknown ‐ assumed multiple leases

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Located within LSISViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential legal constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 98 0 0 Achievability Unk4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 136 ‐ ‐ 98 0 98 0 98

Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption:6 storeysAssumed 30% of GIA used to reprovide employment floorspace

Potentially Developable

Site is located within LSIS. Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability and acceptable design for mixed use. 

SBC2 Call for Sites LP1107 Main Avenue Site ‐ Southbury 4.49 Residential  ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing reside

Close proximity to local amenities 

Redevelop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Redevelopment and decanting of existing housing and residents. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. Extensive consultation with existing residents would be required, as well as decant housing for existing residents to be completed. A ballot would also be required. 

0 82 0 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 82 0 82 0 82

The developer has completed a viability study based on demolition and full redevelopment. This has been consdidered not viable. The estimated capacity used is the one proposed by the developer considering intensification.

Developable n/a

SBC3 Call for Sites LP1121 Verve House Baird Road EN1 1SJ Southbury 0.26 Warehouse and officesMisture of useIndustrial estate

None known. 

Close proximity to local amenities 

Redevelop to mixed development of employment and co‐living

Potential existing occupiers on site TBC. 

11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% within SIL 

Located within existing SIL ‐ not an established residential area. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses in addition to housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 0 53 0 Potentially achiev4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 205 ‐ ‐ 53 0 53 0 53Case study: Chobman Manor. Height assumption: 6 storeys

Potentially developableSubject to SIL designation. Land to be assessed for employment need as well. 

SBC35 Call for Sites LP653 Sainsburys Crown Road EN1 1TH Southbury 3.21 Supermarket + car parkResidential  Mixed area Existing uses o

Located within urban area. Close proximity to local amenities 

Redevelop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses in addition to housing. 

Would have to come forward as part of a larger masterplanned development. Land owner coordination and delivery of infrastructure would act as a delivery constraint. Delivery may also be constrained by existing store. 

0 521 521 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 324 ‐ ‐ 1041 0 1041 0 1041Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 10 storeys

Developable n/a

SBC36 Call for Sites LP1104 Morrisons, Southbury Road  EN1 1TW Southbury 2.75 Supermarket + car parkResidential an Mixed area Existing uses o

Located within urban area. Close proximity to local amenities 

Redevelop None known  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses in addition to housing. 

Would have to come forward as part of a larger masterplanned development. Land owner coordination and delivery of infrastructure would act as a delivery constraint. Delivery may also be constrained by existing store. 

0 446 446 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 324 ‐ ‐ 892 0 892 0 892Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 10 storeys

Developable n/a

SBC4 Call for Sites LP1131 Southbury Road Superstore Area EN1 1NW Southbury 1.74 Retail food store and caMixed Use resMixed area Existing buildin

Close proximity to local amenities 

Redevelop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses in addition to housing. 

Operational requirement for a replacement Supermarket and Customer Car Park. Continuity of trade operation also required throughout development. 

Possible additional land assembly, to include the Royal Mail depot and/ or the Savoy Parade properties, could substantially improve and increase volume, but would require land coordination.

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 291 0 0 Achievable 4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 168 ‐ ‐ 291 0 291 0 291Case study: Harvard Gardens. Maximum height: 10 storeys

Developable n/a

SBC5 Call for Sites LP463, 20/03011/FUL Moorfield Health Centre, 2 Moorfield Road EN3 5TU Southbury 0.3 Unused health centre Residential. CuMixed area Trees; overloo

Close proximity to local amenities 

Redevelop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses. 

Constrained by mature trees and overlooking from adjacent properties. 

0 49 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 49 0 49 0 49Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 5 storeys

Developable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

SBC6 Call for Sites LP656_1 46 Crown Rd, Enfield  EN1 1TH Southbury 0.78 Travis Perkins (Sui GeneMixed use devIndustrial estate

Mature trees o

Close proximity to local amenities 

DevelopSingle freeholder

11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 100% within SIL 

Located within existing SIL ‐ not an established residential area. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses in addition to housing. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 141 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 181 ‐ ‐ 141 0 141 0 141

SITE INCLUDE LISTED BUILDING. CONVERSION of listed building and ERECTION linear block to the back of the site. CONVERSION ‐ Existing GEA=763sqm; NIA=65%GEA=496sqm; No. of dwellings=496/60=8 dwellings. NEW BUILT ‐ Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 6 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to review of SIL designation. Land to be assessed for employment need as well. 

SBC8 Call for Sites LP1196 Ayley Croft, Enfield EN1 1XU Southbury 0.05 Garages Residential Suburban housing

None known. 

Located within urban area. Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 8 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block 167 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8Case study: Finsbury Park Villas. Height assumption: 5 storeys (5/6 of case density study)

Developable n/a

SBC9 Call for Sites LP1196 St Martins Close Garages EN1 4HU Southbury 0.08 Garages ResidentialSuburban housing

Adjacent to m

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 9 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 Case study: Ordnance Mews Developable n/a

SBE16 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Site at Service Road ‐ Southbury 0.12 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 8 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SBE17 Enfield Road WatchLP662Behind the building at (the north end of) Southbury Avenue 

‐ Southbury 0.06 Amenity space Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SBE24 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Car parking / garages at Moorfield Road ‐ Southbury 0.13 Car Park & Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 24 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 181 ‐ ‐ 24 0 24 0 24Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 4 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SBE25 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Car parking at Lytchet Way ‐ Southbury 0.06 Car Park Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 11 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 181 ‐ ‐ 11 0 11 0 11Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 4 storeys

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SBE26 Enfield Road WatchLP662Space behind block at corner of Carterhatch Lane / A10

‐ Southbury 0.07 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableLies within Flood Zone 2. Mitigation would be required. 

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 5 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SBP13 Planning Applicatio 18/02070/PRJ 38 Crown Road, Enfield EN1 1TH Southbury 0.61 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

No known abnormal costs. Site with significant policy constraints to overcome ‐ SIL

12 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 12 0 12 0 12 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SBP15 Planning Applicatio 18/03466/FUL 59‐61 Main Avenue, Enfield EN1 1DS Southbury 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  18 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 18 0 18 0 18 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SBP20 Planning Applicatio 18/04316/FUL 2A Cecil Avenue Enfield EN1 1PR Southbury 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SBP28 Planning Applicatio 19/03484/FULSub Station Brickfield House 284 Southbury RoadEnfield

EN1 1GG Southbury 0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Currently a substation ‐ potential extra costs for substation re‐location

Site with significant policy constraints to overcome ‐ SIL

5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SBS27 SHLAA 2017 17100360 Southbury Station EN3 4HW Southbury 0.36 Station UnknownMixed area near station 

Operational RaLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through infrastructure provider call for sites

Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as not previously developed for housing and not located within established area of housing. 

The station is in operational use. The site was not submitted as part of the Call for Sites. No evidence exists to demonstrate how residential could come forward on this site. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential legal constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the ne

The site was not submitted as part of the Call for Sites and therefore assumed not available. Inadequate evidence submitted to demonstrate residential development could be deliverable.

SBS34b SHLAA 2017 17100204Enfield Town Railway Station/Delivery Office ‐ Windmill Hill

EN1 1YB Southbury 0.09 Vacant Land UnknownMixed area near station 

Part of operatLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through infrastructure provider call for sites

Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Potential unknown costs as a result of proximity to railway. 

The station is in operational use. Together with the absence of planning permission, it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 18 0 0 Achievable 5 Villa block 200 0 0 18 0 18 0 18 Case study: Finsbury Park Villas. Height assumption: 6 storeys Potentially developable

Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

SGC1 Call for Sites LP1145, 20/04193/FULSite between North Circular Road and Station Road

N11 1QJSouthgate Green

1.13 Sui Generis/B8 DecommResidential Mixed area Decommission

Located within urban area. Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Cost of decomissioning exisitng gasworks. 

Potential vehicular access constraints

0 230 0 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 230 0 230 0 230

Estimate based on assumption comes forward together with SGS14 in a masterplanned approach. Estimated capacity takes into account the emerging gas‐holder pre‐application proposals and the new southgate masterplan. 

Developable n/a

SGC2 Call for Sites LP1159 Land at Ritz Parade ‐Southgate Green

0.65 Commercial / retail Mixed Use  Mixed area Existing shops 

Close proximity to local amenities 

Comprehensive redevelopment

Site submitted by freeholder

The majority of  tenants are on short term leases. All tenants are aware of Notting Hill Genesis’ intention to develop the site in thefuture and of the draft Ritz ParadeDevelopment Brief.

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Includes existing employment uses on site that would have to be reprovided, subject to policy review. Additional costs of relocation/decanting of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Unknown 0 79 0 0 Potentially achiev4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 174 ‐ ‐ 79 0 79 0 79

Case study: Brentford Lock West (Block E and F). Height assumption: 6 storeysAssumed 30% of floor area provided for employment uses. 

Potentially developable

In current employment use. Could be considered for residential, subject to assessment for employment requirements. Viability of mixed use development would also require demonstration. 

SGC3 Call for Sites LP1170 Rear of 301‐321 Bowes Road  N11 1BDSouthgate Green

0.12 Rear gardens and garagResidentialSuburban housing

Potential acce

Close proximity to local amenities 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Unknown. 

Land assembly of multiple ownerships will lengthen delivery timescales. Potential access constraints to consider, due to location. 

0 14 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 14 0 14 0 14Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions, viability and access constraints. 

SGC4 Planning Applicatio LP608_2, 20/01049/FU Arnos Grove Station Car Park  N11Southgate Green

1.08 Car Park Residential (ReMixed area near station 

Mature trees s

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Unknown. 

Site segregated into two physically separate sites. May impact delivery rates. A planning application has been submitted. 

0 120 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion ‐ ‐ ‐ 120 0 120 0 120

Recent planning application for 162 homes was refused. A reduced capacity may be able to be found acceptable, subject to other planning issues. 

Developable n/a

SGC5 Call for Sites LP656_2 19 Station Road, New Southgate N11 1QJSouthgate Green

0.23  Travis Perkins BuildersMixed Use Mixed area near station 

Narrow site m

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop None known 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Additional costs of relocation/decanting of existing tenants and redevelopment of existing site. 

Unknown 0 0 14 0 Achievability Unk1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 88 ‐ ‐ 14 0 14 0 14Case study: North StreetAssumes 30% of GIA is used for employment uses. 

Potentially developable

In current employment use. Could be considered for residential, subject to assessment for employment requirements. Viability of mixed use development would also require demonstration. 

SGC6 Call for Sites LP608_7 Arnos Grove Sidings N11 1QDSouthgate Green

2.28 Railway sidings and adj Residential, reMixed area Railway siding

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop parts of land Unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Unknown. Constraints from operational sidings may constrain capacity

0 47 0 0 Potentially achiev4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 205 ‐ ‐ 47 0 47 0 47Case study: Chobman Manor. Height assumption: 6 storeys. Circa 10% of land is developable

Potentially developable Only part of land is developable. 

SGC8 Call for Sites LP1196 Highview Gardens N11 1SESouthgate Green

0.33 Amenity space / car pa ResidentialSuburban housing

Adjacent to ra

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 15 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 45 ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 Case study: Perry Mead Developable n/a

SGD11 Allocations/Opport New Southgate MasterArnos Grove Local Centre and Arnos Grove Station

N11Southgate Green

2.3 Existing Housing and ShCommunity faMixed area Existing develo

Within local centre, adjacent to station

Unknown Unknown n/a Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

Potential abnormal costs to redevelop/repurpose listed building. 

Given the absence of planning permission and the existing use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. 

0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0Assumed not suitable for redevelopment due to listed buildings. 

Not developable within the neNot suitable for redevelopment due to listed buildings. 

SGD5 Allocations/Opport North Circular AAP (SitArnos Pool, Bowes Road Library and Arnos Grove Medical Centre

‐Southgate Green

0.6 Community Uses  Expansion of cMixed area Listed buildingAdjacent to local centre 

Unknown  Unknown n/a Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aTBC following whole plan viability findings. 

Potential abnormal costs to redevelop/repurpose listed building. 

Given the absence of planning permission and the existing use it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. 

0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0Assumed not suitable for redevelopment due to listed buildings. 

Not developable within the neNot suitable for redevelopment due to listed buildings. 

SGE9 Enfield Road WatchLP662Garage site at the corner of Seafield Road and Wilmer Way

‐Southgate Green

0.09 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

Potential additional abnormal costs due to flood risk mitigation required. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SGP11 Planning Applicatio 18/00293/FUL Cambrai Court, 130 Aldermans Hill, London N13 4QHSouthgate Green

0.15 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP13 Planning Applicatio 18/00388/OUT 188‐200 Bowes Road, London N11 2JHSouthgate Green

0.48 n/a ‐ principle of devel Hybrid planninn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Delivery rate likely to be restricted due to site size. 

0 86 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 86 0 86 0 86 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable18/00388/OUT 86 homes considered developable as still awaiting decision.

SGP21 Planning Applicatio 18/02840/FUL 118 Waterfall Road, London N14 7JNSouthgate Green

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP22 Planning Applicatio 18/03557/FUL Garages, Bowes Road, London N13 4NPSouthgate Green

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP23 Planning Applicatio 18/04426/FUL Rear Of 126‐128 High Road, London N11 1PGSouthgate Green

0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP27 Planning Applicatio 19/02087/FUL 152‐152A Fox Lane, London N13 4BASouthgate Green

0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP28 Planning Applicatio 19/02230/FUL Church Hall, Grove Road, London N11 1LXSouthgate Green

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  19 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 19 0 19 0 19 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP33 Planning Applicatio 19/03406/FULCoppice Wood Lodge, 10 Grove Road, Southgate

N11 1LXSouthgate Green

0.39 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 45 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 45 0 45 0 45 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable19/03406/FUL 54 homes withdrawn replaced with 20/03448/FUL 45 units application in progress

SGP34 Planning Applicatio 19/04270/FULLand And Garage Site To The Rear Of 114 Station Road, New Southgate, Southgate

N11 1QESouthgate Green

0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs. Restricted access to site  between existing buildings

6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP35 Planning Applicatio P12‐02202PLA Ladderswood Estate N11Southgate Green

3.42 n/a ‐ principle of devel Phased redeven/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. 

Delivery rate likely to be restricted due to site size. 

181 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 517 161 356 175 181 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP36 Planning Applicatio P14‐00197PLA 109, Station Road, London, N11 1QHSouthgate Green

0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known n/a ‐ already dAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 44 0 44 44 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Not developable within the ne Already delivered. 

SGP37 Planning Applicatio P12‐02089PLA Garages Waterfall Road N11 1NJSouthgate Green

0.1837 n/a ‐ principle of development establn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission DeliverableCompleted already. Will record as completed on 1 April 2020 as not reported before. 

SGP6 Planning Applicatio 16/03581/FULLand Rear Of 36‐38 Friern Barnet Road New Southgate London

N11 1NASouthgate Green

0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 3 sn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGP8 Planning Applicatio 17/04378/FUL Rear Of 126‐128 High Road, London N11 1PGSouthgate Green

0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SGS1 SHLAA 2017 17100002 1‐5 Lynton Court, 80 ‐ 98 Bowes Road ‐Southgate Green

0.85 n/a ‐ already delivered n/a ‐ already dn/a ‐ already delivered

n/a ‐ already dn/a ‐ already delivered

n/a ‐ already deliveredn/a ‐ already delivered

n/a ‐ already dNot available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ already delivered n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the neAlready delivered. Therefore assumed no longer available. 

SGS13 SHLAA 2017 17100369Land Adj To New Southgate Station, Station Road

‐Southgate Green

0.36 Car parking and railwayUnknownMixed area near station 

Part of operatLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA by LBE Unknown 6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Potential unknown costs as a result of proximity to railway. 

Severely constrained site due to site dimensions/proportions and proximity to railway land. Likely to constrain delivery. 

0 32 0 0 Achievable 1.3. House ‐ Semi‐detached 88 ‐ ‐ 32 0 32 0 32 Case study: North Street Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

SGS14 SHLAA 2017 17100370 Station Road, New  Southgate ‐Southgate Green

1.37 Homebase Unknown Mixed area Existing uses oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through infrastructure provider call for sites

Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as site not previously developed for housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential land owner coordination required it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 203 0 0 Potentially achiev ‐ 0 0 0 203 0 203 0 203

Estimate based on assumption comes forward together with SGC2 in a masterplanned approach. Based on current pre‐application discussions and the New Southgate Masterplan 

Potentially DevelopablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

SOC1 Call for Sites LP1183 Rear of 158‐174 Chase Road N14 4LH Southgate 0.12 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing trees o

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 14 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 14 0 14 0 14Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

SOC10 Call for Sites LP1196 Ivy Road, Enfield N14 4LP Southgate 0.11 Garages / car parking ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable Adjacent to local open spaceAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 8 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 Case study: Ordnance Mews Developable n/a

SOC11 Call for Sites LP1196 Ivy Road site 2 N14 4LP Southgate 0.1 Garages / car parking ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable Adjacent to local open spaceAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 Case study: Ordnance Mews Developable n/a

SOC2 Call for Sites LP1185 Rear of 3‐19 Fountains Crescent N14 6BG Southgate 0.06 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 4 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 77 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2 storeys (2/3 of case study density) 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

SOC3 Call for Sites LP1186 Rear of 6 unnumbered houses, The Vale N14 6HT Southgate 0.05 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 5 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

SOC4 Call for Sites LP1189_1 Rear of 180‐216 Chase Road N14 4LH Southgate 0.2 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 42 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 42 0 42 0 42Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

SOC5 Call for Sites LP1189_2 Rear of 9‐31 Mayfair Terrace N14 6HU Southgate 0.15 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 6 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

SOC6 Call for Sites LP1190 Rear of 6‐34 Mayfair Terrace N14 6HJ Southgate 0.11 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 6 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

SOC7 Call for Sites LP1191 24‐54 Chelmsford Road  N14 5PT Southgate 0.16 Garages / rear garden l ResidentialSuburban housing

Existing garage

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

None known.  None known.  0 92 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 92 0 92 0 92Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of availability and landowner intentions. 

SOC8a Call for Sites LP681 Barnet and Southgate College (Parcel a)  N14 6BS Southgate 0.91 Further education colleThe site has thMixed area Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Redevelopment of existing buildings, and construction logistics around existing school / college buildings. 

None known.  0 5 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption is 5‐6 storeys

Developable n/a

SOC8b Call for Sites LP681 Barnet and Southgate College (Parcel b) N14 6BS Southgate 0.18 Further education colleThe site has thMixed area Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Redevelopment of existing buildings, and construction logistics around existing school / college buildings. 

None known.  0 24 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 24 0 24 0 24Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption is 5‐6 storeys

Developable n/a

SOE30 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Garage site at Rushey Hill ‐ Highlands 0.07 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown, potential mulitiple ownerships and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 5 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

SOE9 Call for Sites CFS209 Asda site – 130 Chase Side ‐ Southgate 1.58 Retail Residential  Mixed area Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 11‐15 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aSignificant known cost factors. Further landowner viability information required. 

Operational supermarket on site presently. No owner intention indicated. Cost of providing temporary store in nearby location and/or loss of trade during store closure to be considered. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 165 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 n/a Potentially developableFORMERLY: Not developable due to existing uses on site and lack of landowner engagement. 

SOG1 Public Sector Land LP662 Southgate Station ‐ Plan 6 ‐ Southgate 0.31 Station ImprovementsMixed area near station 

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the ne Not identified for residential use

SOP1 Planning Applicatio 20/00382/FULCar ParkTudor WayLondon

N14 6PS Southgate 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing buildings. 

Works need to guarantee continuous access to existing properties. 

9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP10 Planning Applicatio 17/02548/FUL 117 Winchmore Hill Road, London. N14 6AN Southgate 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 1 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP14 Planning Applicatio 17/04807/FULRookwood Lodge, 57 Blagdens Lane, New Southgate

N14 6DB Southgate 0.11 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP16 Planning Applicatio 17/05114/FUL Bramford Court, High Street N14 6DH Southgate 0.35 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP17 Planning Applicatio 18/00057/FUL 12 The Close, London N14 6DN Southgate 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub division ofn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP19 Planning Applicatio 18/00755/FULBurleigh Parade 2‐16 Burleigh Gardens London

N14 5AD Southgate 0.15 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP20 Planning Applicatio 18/00787/FULRear Of Ashleigh Court And 2 Avenue Road London

N14 4EJ Southgate 0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP28 Planning Applicatio 18/04262/FUL Land Rear Of 184 Chase Side London N14 5HN Southgate 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 2 xn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP3 Planning Applicatio 17/02342/FUL Ever Ready House 93 Burleigh Gardens N14 5AJ Southgate 0.22 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 22 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 22 0 22 0 22 n/a ‐ based on permission deliverable

pp lapsed 13.12.2020. Change of use of existing building and part 3rd floor extension to provide 66 bed hotel with associated external alterations landscape and car parking.

SOP34 Planning Applicatio 19/01614/FUL Hobart Court, 51 The Bourne N14 6EX Southgate 0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of a rn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing building. 

None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP35 Planning Applicatio 19/01941/FULSouthgate Office Village 286 Chase Road London.

N14 6HF Southgate 0.55 Office Mixed use resiMixed area Existing buildinLocated within urban area

As per permission None known 6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development accepted as part of previous application 

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and submitted landowner information 

Demolition of existing uses  None known.  0 125 0 0 Achievable 4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 136 ‐ ‐ 125 0 125 0 125 Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption: 10 storeys  Developable

Appropriate response to previous refused planning application required to be considered deliverable (Reason for refusal: The proposed development, due to its height, bulk and massing would result in an intrusive, incongruous and visually prominent form of development that would cause less than substantial harm to the setting of the adjoining heritage assets with insufficient public benefits provided by the development to outweigh this harm.)

SOP41 Planning Applicatio 19/03819/FUL 105 The Vale, London N14 6BB Southgate 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP7 Planning Applicatio 16/05351/FUL 7 Park Road, London N14 6HB Southgate 0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of noise mitigation due to proximity to railway tracks. 

None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOP44 Planning Applicatio 17/04327/FULOakwood Park Cottages 1 And 2 Willow Walk London 

N21 1NH Southgate 0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 2 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Completed in 2020/21

SOP45 Planning Applicatio 19/00591/FUL Chase House, 305 Chase Road N14 6JS Southgate 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a fn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

SOS11 Call for sites CFS157 M&S Food, Southgate  N14 6AD Southgate 0.45 M & S simply food and UnknownMixed area near station 

Existing uses oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA call for sites Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as site not previously developed for housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential land owner coordination required it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 150 0 0 Achievability Unk4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 136 ‐ ‐ 61 0 61 ‐89 150 Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption: 6 storeys  Developable n/a

SOS12 SHLAA 2017 17100318 Oakwood Station ‐ Southgate 6.59 Railway sidings and adj n/a ‐ not assesn/a ‐ not assessed

Part of operatn/a ‐ not assessed

n/a ‐ not assessedn/a ‐ not assessed

n/a

Not available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ operational railway sidings n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the ne

Assumed not available as not submitted as part of more recent call for sites from same landowner. Planning application coming forward on station car park site.

SOS19 SHLAA 2017 17100102 Chase Road ‐ Southgate 0.36 Mixture of non‐residenUnknownMixed area near station 

Existing uses oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted through GLA SHLAA 2013 Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as site not previously developed for housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential land owner coordination required it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 65 0 0 Achievability Unk4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 181 ‐ ‐ 65 0 65 0 65 Case study: Buccleuh House. Height assumption: 6 storeys Potentially developable

Potentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

TOE20 Enfield Road WatchLP662Garages and hard standing around housing at Parsonage Lane

‐ Town 0.11 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown Unknown 6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

TOE29 Enfield Road WatchLP662Garages at the corner of the Jewish Cemetery

‐ Town 0.0636 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Minimal. Adjac

Located within urban area, some distance from nearest local centre. 

Unknown

Unknown. Multiple ownerships assumed. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

Legal costs associated with consolidating multiple ownerships. 

Limited delivery constraints.  0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered potentially developable subject to confirming availability. 

TOP11 Planning Applicatio 16/05402/FUL Garages Gordon Hill Enfield EN2 0QP Town 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing buildings. 

Restricted access to site between existing buildings. 

4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP13 Planning Applicatio 17/02767/FUL Car Park Chapel Street Enfield EN2 6QF Town 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 5 xn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP14 Planning Applicatio 17/03925/FUL Bridge House 1 Forty Hill Enfield EN2 9HT Town 0.35 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  42 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 42 0 42 0 42 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP16 Planning Applicatio 17/04440/FUL 63 Church Street, Enfield EN2 6AN Town 0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Part 2, part 3‐sn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP27 Planning Applicatio 18/03393/PRJ 2 – 6 Silver Street, Enfield EN1 3EE Town 0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP32 Planning Applicatio 19/00517/PIP Public House 223 Baker Street Enfield EN1 3LA Town 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Residential den/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP42 Planning Applicatio 19/03493/FUL Vacant Land Wilford Close Enfield EN2 6AJ Town 0.04 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP44 Planning Applicatio 19/03712/FUL 20 – 24 Southbury Road, Enfield EN1 1SA Town 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP46 Planning Applicatio 19/03612/PRJ  Refuge House 9 – 10 River Front Enfield EN1 3SZ Town 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  76 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 76 0 76 0 76 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOP9 Planning Applicatio 16/03643/FUL1 Bodiam Close And 1 ‐3 Pevensey Avenue, Enfield

EN1 3HZ Town 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demolition of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 14 3 11 11 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TOS1 SHLAA 2017 17100023 9‐85 Parsonage Lane ‐ Town 0.36 n/a ‐ not assessed n/a ‐ not assesn/a ‐ not assessed

n/a ‐ not assesn/a ‐ not assessed

n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ already deliveredn/a ‐ not assessed

n/a Not available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Exclude n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Not suitable n/a ‐ not assessed ‐ operational railway sidings n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Unachievable ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n/a Not developable within the neAlready delivered. Therefore assumed no longer available. 

TUC1 Call for Sites LP1101 7 Elsinge Road EN1 4PG Turkey Street 0.12 Day Nursery  Residential ledSuburban housing

None known. 

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known. 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Limited delivery constraints.  0 19 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 19 0 19 0 19 Case study: Ryle Yard Developable n/a

TUC2 Call for Sites LP695 550‐560 Hertford Road EN3 5ST Turkey Street 0.09 Retail with residential aResidential / rSuburban housing

Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aDesirable location in mixed use area. Viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Relocation of existing tenants and demolition of existing buildings. 

Unknown.  0 10 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 113 ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10Case study: Paxton House. Height assumption: 5 storey

Potentially developableCould be considered potentially developable subject to viability and availability. 

TUC5 Call for Sites LP1196 Elsinge Road, Elsinge Road (1‐19) EN1 4PE Turkey Street 0.23 Garages and undevelopResidential Suburban housing

Existing buildin

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Potential access constraints.  0 15 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

TUC6a Call for Sites LP1196 Dendbridge Close (Next to Scouts Hut ) EN1 4PL Turkey Street 0.55 Car park / garages ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Potential access constraints.  0 18 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 18 0 18 0 18

Case study: South Chase Lot 3Assumed 50% available for development ‐ rest to be retained as car parking

Developable n/a

TUC6b Call for Sites LP1196 Dendbridge Close (Next to Scouts Hut ) EN1 4PN Turkey Street 0.17 Car park / garages ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Potential access constraints.  0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6

Case study: South Chase Lot 3Assumed 50% available for development ‐ rest to be retained as car parking

Developable n/a

TUC7 Call for Sites LP1196 Kempe Hall, Kempe Rd EN1 4QS Turkey Street 0.13 Library and car parking ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Demolition of existing uses None known.  0 17 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 11 0 11 ‐6 17Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 5 storeys

Developable n/a

TUC8 Call for Sites LP1196 Mason Rd Car Park, Masons Rd EN1 4QT Turkey Street 0.3 Car Park ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Potential access constraints.  0 10 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Developable n/a

TUC9a Call for Sites LP1196 Stoneleigh 1 – Stoneleigh Ave EN1 4HL Turkey Street 0.07 Amenity grassland and ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 45 ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 Case study: Perry Mead Developable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

TUC9c Call for Sites LP1196 Stoneleigh 3 – Stoneleigh Ave EN1 4HH Turkey Street 0.05 Amenity grassland and ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 1 0 0 Achievable 2. Cluster 43 ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 Case study: Essex Mews Developable n/a

TUC9d Call for Sites LP1196 Stoneleigh 4 – Stoneleigh Ave EN1 4HG Turkey Street 0.08 Amenity grassland and ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 45 ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 Case study: Perry Mead Developable n/a

TUC9e Call for Sites LP1196 Stoneleigh 5 – Northumberland Ave EN1 4HF Turkey Street 0.11 Amenity grassland and ResidentialSuburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Develop None known 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 2 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 45 ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 Case study: Perry Mead Developable n/a

TUE12a Enfield Road WatchLP662Consolidate car parks on Dendridge Close/Auckland Close

‐ Turkey Street 0.31 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 20 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 20 0 20 0 20 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

TUE13 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Turkey Street Car Park ‐ Turkey Street 0.08 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 5 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

TUE6a Enfield Road WatchLP662Possible reconfiguring of carparking space on Bullsmoor Way estate (north)

‐ Turkey Street 0.05 Car Park Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 3 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 3 0 3 0 3 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

TUE6b Enfield Road WatchLP662Possible reconfiguring of carparking space on Bullsmoor Way estate (east)

‐ Turkey Street See TUE6a Car Park Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 0 0 0 Achievable See TUE6a See TUE6a ‐ ‐ See TUE6a 0 0 0 0 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableSee TUE6a. Could be considered developable subject to confirming availability.

TUE6c Enfield Road WatchLP662Possible reconfiguring of carparking space on Bullsmoor Way estate (west)

‐ Turkey Street See TUE6a Car Park Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 0 0 0 Achievable See TUE6a See TUE6a ‐ ‐ See TUE6a 0 0 0 0 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableSee TUE6a. Could be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

TUP10 Planning Applicatio 17/05423/FUL Land Adjacent To 842 Hertford Road, Enfield EN3 6UE Turkey Street 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Change of usen/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUP15 Planning Applicatio 18/01165/FUL 1 Brookside Gardens, Enfield EN1 4QG Turkey Street 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUP23 Planning Applicatio 18/04453/FUL 113 Bullsmoor Lane, Enfield EN3 6TQ Turkey Street 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  7 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUP31 Planning Applicatio 19/01641/FUL 16‐20 Turkey Street, Enfield EN3 5TR Turkey Street 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing buildings. 

None known.  2 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 0 2 0 2 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUP39 Planning Applicatio 19/03444/FUL 97 – 99 Bullsmoor Lane, Enfield EN3 6TQ Turkey Street 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 2 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUP5 Planning Applicatio 16/05917/FUL Rear Of 638 Hertford Road, Enfield EN3 5TD Turkey Street 0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUP6 Planning Applicatio 17/04248/FULSocial Club398 Hertford RoadEnfield

EN3 5QS Turkey Street 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  10 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

TUS5 SHLAA 2017 17100172 Lidl Store And Parking, Hertford Road EN3 6LZ  Turkey Street 0.75 Supermarket + car parkUnknown Mixed area Existing uses oLocated within urban area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA by LBE Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as site not previously developed for housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential land owner coordination required it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 181 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter blo 130 48 ‐ 181 0 181 0 181Case study: 50% 4 storey Linear block (Ryle Yard) + 50% terraces ( Marmalade Lane)

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability and viability. 

UPC34 Call for Sites LP631 Land at Bull Lane ‐Upper Edmonton

2.675 Employment Mixed use ‐ emIndustrial area

Existing uses o

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop Unknown 11‐15 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Located 100% in SIL. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Relocation of existing tenants and demolition of existing buildings. 

Unknown.  0 182 0 0 Potentially achiev4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 136 ‐ ‐ 182 0 182 0 182

Case study: The Echoes. Height assumption is 5‐6 storeysAssumed 50% of floor area for residential and 50% for employment. 

Potentially developableCould be considered potentially developable subject to review of LSIS policy designation. 

UPE4 Enfield Road WatchLP662Parking at Nuffield Close (parking could be on the Close)

‐Upper Edmonton

0.06 Vacant Land Residential Low density dwellings 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 77 66 ‐ 4 0 4 0 4Case study: 50% townhouse (Ordnance Road) + 50% mews (South Chase Lot 3)

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

UPE5 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Trafalgar Place car park ‐Upper Edmonton

0.08 Car Park Residential Low density dwellings 

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 83 ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 Case study: Goldsmith Street Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

UPM1 Masterplan/DeveloUPM1 Joyce Avenue & Snells Park Estate ‐Upper Edmonton

9.94 Residential  Residential  Mixed area Existing HousinAdjacent to local centre

Masterplan design work underway for comprehensive redevelopment. Resident ballot planned post‐covid

Some leaseholders within site

6‐10, 10‐15

Potentially Availab

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include withSmall proportion of site within Flood Risk Zone 3 at northern tip of site

N N N N Partial N N N N Y N N N N N Potentially Suitable

Potentially suitable due to overlap with Flood Risk Zone 2 + 3 and Local Open Space designations, which will require consideration through design and/or mitigation. 

Subject to whole plan viability and landowner information.

Decanting of existing residents and demolition of existing housing will add additional costs. 

Given the absence of planning permission and the existing housing it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. 

0 608 608 608 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2620 795 1825 0 1825

Figures based on latest applicant's  accomodation schedule. However, further assessment required of these proposals to confirm acceptability in relation to planning considerations. 

Potentially developable

Site could developable subject to receiving positive ballot, resolving decanting requirements for existing residents, and addressing any leasehold ownership constraints. 

UPP2 Planning Applicatio TP/05/1745 219 College Close, London N18 2XSUpper Edmonton

0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

UPP24 Planning Applicatio 19/02718/RE3

Meridian Water Orbital Business Park (and Adjoining Land Including Land South Of Argon Road And Land Known As Ikea Clear And Gas Holder Leeside Road)5 Argon Road, London

N18 3BZUpper Edmonton

11.9 n/a ‐ principle of devel Development n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 6‐10 years, 11‐

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to information submitted with application. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities and flood mitigation measures.  

None known.  767 767 767 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2300 0 2300 0 2300 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

UPP25 Planning Applicatio 19/03150/FUL 5 Dysons Road, London N18 2DQUpper Edmonton

0.04 Residential  Residential (ReMixed use area

None known Located within urban area 

As per previous application  None known  0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 5 0 0 Potentially achiev ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on previous application Developable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

UPP32 Planning Applicatio 16/01197/RE3Meridian Water Willoughby Lane And Meridian Way London

N18Upper Edmonton

8.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Development n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years; 6‐10Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities and flood mitigation measures.  

None known.  363 363 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 725 0 725 0 725 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

UPP33 Planning Applicatio 19/04401/FULVacant Land Adjacent To 14 Albany Road And Rear Of 6 Leopold Road, London

N18 2DXUpper Edmonton

0.05 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

UPC6a Call for Sites Call for Sites REF LP597Meridian Water Area (excluding planning application areas) ‐ West bank

‐Upper Edmonton

30.93 Mixture of uses includi Develop resideBrownfield land

Numerous con

Potential to create new local services. Existing train station and supermarket on site. 

Develop residential alongside other uses. Site in multiple ownerships. 

11‐15 years; 1

Potentially availab

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include with

Partly in Flood Zone 3 N N N Partial N N N N N Partial N N N N N Potentially suitable15% located within LSIS; 5% located within Flood Risk Zone 3. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities, social infrastructure etc. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 0 0 Achievability Unk ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0

A total of 5,000 homes is allocated in ELAAP from which dwellings which already have consent in  Phase 1 and 2 (totalling 3025 homes) have been subtracted. The remaining balance has been apportioned between UPC2 and UPC1  assuming an equal density on each.

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of viability and addressing policy constraints. 

UPC2 Call for sites LP1130 Tesco Extra, 1 Glover Drive, N11 2LU ‐Upper Edmonton

4.24 Retail food store and caResidentialBrownfield land

Not known at 

Potential to create new local  services. Existing train station and supermarket on site. 

Site identified for High Density Mixed Use Residential and Commercial. Operational requirement for a replacement Large Format Superstore and Customer Car Park. Continuity of trade operation also required throughout development. Massing studies suggest c1300 – 1500 homes could be added to the site. 

Site is Freehold with Long Lease interest.

6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities, social infrastructure etc. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 661 0 0 Achievability Unk ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 661 0 661 0 661

A total of 5,000 homes is allocated in ELAAP from which dwellings which already have consent in  Phase 1 and 2 (totalling 3025 homes) have been subtracted. The remaining balance has been apportioned between UPC2 and UPC1  assuming an equal density on each.

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of viability and deliverability with continued operations. 

UPC1 Call for sites LP1111 IKEA Meridian Water ‐Upper Edmonton

8.43 Retail ‐ Ikea Sore and AResidential‐ledBrownfield land

No known con

Potential to create new local  services. Existing train station and supermarket on site. 

Potential for up to 3000 homes, relocation of ikea store, associated employment floorspace and supporting infrastructure

None known. 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitablePart of site located within Flood Zone 2. Suitable subject to mitigation measures. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities, social infrastructure etc. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 427 887 0 Achievability Unk ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1314 0 1314 0 1314

A total of 5,000 homes is allocated in ELAAP from which dwellings which already have consent in  Phase 1 and 2 (totalling 3025 homes) have been subtracted. The remaining balance has been apportioned between UPC2 and UPC1  assuming an equal density on each.

Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of viability and deliverability with continued operations. 

UPP7 Planning Applicatio 17/02962/RE4Dover House28 Bolton Road, London

N18 1HRUpper Edmonton

0.29 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

UPP8 Planning Applicatio 17/05524/FUL 79 Fore Street, London N18 2TWUpper Edmonton

0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a tn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

UPP9 Planning Applicatio 18/00760/FUL Public House 50‐56 Fore Street London N18 2SSUpper Edmonton

0.19 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 68 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 68 0 68 0 68 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable18/00760/FUL 68 homes moved into phase 2 as still awaiting decision

UPS15 SHLAA 2017 17100293 Commercial Road ‐Upper Edmonton

0.26 Industrial shed UnknownOn edge of industrial estate

Existing uses o

Located within urban area; on edge of established residential area

Unknown ‐ submitted to GLA by LBE Unknown 11‐15 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers. Potential unknown costs as site not previously developed for housing. 

Given the the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period.

0 20 0 0 Achievability Unk3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 77 ‐ ‐ 20 0 20 0 20 Case study: Ordnance Road Potentially developablePotentially developable subject to confirmation of availability, viability and proposed use. 

UPS21 SHLAA 2017 17100372 Upton Road And Raynham Road ‐Upper Edmonton

1.92 Residential  Residential Mixed residential typologies

Existing uses oLocated within urban area 

RedevelopPotential leaseholders in situ

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable 10 % of site located within flood risk Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Demolition of existing buildings and reprovision of existing uses / relocation of existing occupiers.

Given the the absence of planning permission, and potential leaseholder constraints due to leases it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable period. This would also require a residents ballot to be undertaken. 

0 198 0 0 Achievable ‐ 115 ‐ ‐ 198 0 198 0 198

Density of current proposal for Phase 1 applied to the entire site.  10% of site within Flood Zone 2 assumed no development. 

Developable n/a

WIC1 Call for Sites LP1172 1a‐17 Cranley Gardens N13 4LTWinchmore Hill

0.07 Garages and residentia Residential Suburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Close to existing housing. No known cost factor dependencies. Viablility to be determined subject to Whole Plan Viability.  

No known abnormal costs.  Potential access constraints 0 4 0 0 Potentially achiev3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 115 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4Case study: Ordnance Mews. Height assumption is 2‐3 storeys 

Potentially developableCould be considered potentially Developable subject to availability. 

WIC17 Enfield Road WatchLP662 Garages at Arundel Gardens ‐Winchmore Hill

0.06 Garages Residential Suburban housing

Constraints un

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

No known abnormal costs. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 4 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a 66 ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

WIC23 Enfield Road WatchLP662Car park / garages (with Scout Hut at the end) at Wilson Street

‐Winchmore Hill

0.26 Vacant Land Residential Suburban housing

Potential acce

Located within urban area. Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Unknown

Site submitted by third party. All with interest in land not aware of submission. 

6‐10 years Availability Unknow N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Assumed viable subject to Whole Plan Viability. Located within area with similar existing consents and delivered permissions. 

Unknown abnormal costs. Potential additional costs to mitigate constraints. 

Given the lack of landowner interest/intent shown and the absence of planning permission it is not likely that this would be delivered in the deliverable  period. 

0 17 0 0 Achievable 3.2. Terrace ‐ Mews dual asp 66 ‐ ‐ 17 0 17 0 17 Case study: South Chase Lot 3 Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming availability. 

WIP1 Planning Applicatio 19/04244/FUL 40 Hillfield Park Winchmore Hill London N21 3QHWinchmore Hill

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP10 Planning Applicatio 17/03314/FUL Police Station, 687 Green Lanes, London N21 3RSWinchmore Hill

0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel Refurbishmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  6 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP17 Planning Applicatio 18/02191/FULLand To East Of 95 Vicars Moor Lane, London

N21 1BLWinchmore Hill

0.22 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics next to existing buildings. 

Garden with mature trees and restricted access between existing buildings. 

1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP24 Planning Applicatio 18/03573/FUL Dumayne House, 1 Fox Lane N13 4ABWinchmore Hill

0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Construction on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

Potential additional costs as a result of construction logistics above existing buildings. 

None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP26 Planning Applicatio 18/03667/FUL 765 Green Lanes, London N21 3SAWinchmore Hill

0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel Creation of adn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  5 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP27 Planning Applicatio 18/04302/FUL 38 Houndsden Road, London N21 1LTWinchmore Hill

0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  4 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4 0 4 0 4 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP28 Planning Applicatio 18/04438/FUL 30 Bourne Hill, London N13 4LHWinchmore Hill

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division on/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP32 Planning Applicatio 19/00201/FUL 465‐469 Green Lanes, London N13 4BSWinchmore Hill

0.24 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  15 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP35 Planning Applicatio 19/01138/FUL Land Rear Of 455 – 463 Green Lanes, London N13 4BSWinchmore Hill

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  8 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP39 Planning Applicatio 19/01544/FUL 36 Station Road Winchmore Hill London N21 3RBWinchmore Hill

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Sub‐division an/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP40 Planning Applicatio 19/01988/FUL St Monica’s Hall 521 Green Lanes London N13 4DHWinchmore Hill

0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  0 6 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Developable19/01988/FUL withdrawn. No new application. Moved to phase 2.

WIP41 Planning Applicatio 19/02736/FUL 62 Carpenter Gardens, London N21 3HGWinchmore Hill

0.21 n/a ‐ principle of devel Redevelopmenn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP45 Planning Applicatio 19/03580/FUL 3 Church Hill, London N21 1LSWinchmore Hill

0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel Conversion of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years Available ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ IncludePrinciple of development established through permission ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable

Principle of development established through permission

Conversion. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  3 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3 0 3 0 3 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP46 Planning Applicatio19/03802/RE4 Reardon Court 26 Cosgrove Close London N21 3BHWinchmore Hill

0.74 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of pan/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  91 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 91 0 91 0 91 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP47 Planning Applicatio 19/03824/FULLand At Hoppers Road, Winchmore Hill, Enfield

N21 3JRWinchmore Hill

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of a dn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP49 Planning Applicatio 19/04287/FUL 76 Broad Walk, London N21 3BJWinchmore Hill

0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel Demoli on of n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  Garden with mature trees.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2 1 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP5 Planning Applicatio 16/03819/FULLand Between St Paul’s Vicarage And 6 Denleigh Gardens, Church Hill, London

N21 1JAWinchmore Hill

0.19 n/a ‐ principle of devel Erection of 2‐sn/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  None known.  1 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1 0 1 0 1 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable n/a

WIP6 Planning Applicatio 18/03301/VAR 543 Green Lanes  N13 4DRWinchmore Hill

0.01 n/a ‐ principle of devel Variation of con/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission none known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

No known abnormal costs.  n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable Completed August 2020

CFS189 Call for sites CFS189 Minchenden CP‐ adj to Leigh Hunt drive  N14 6BT Southgate 0.24 car park  residential  Built up area  noneAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential  unknown 6‐10 years

Available 

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable no major constraints, adjacent to existing housing. Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

no known abnormal costs Unknown.  0 48 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 21 0 21 0 48 based on density Developable n/a

CFS190 Call for sites CFS190Swan Annexe (221 High Street, Enfield North, Enfield 

 EN3 4DX Ponders End 0.18 temporary library residential 

mainly surburban area. Ponders End Planning brief sets out the principles for the redevelopment of this area. However this area is in a strategic location in the London‐Peterborough Growth area.

none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Up to 6 flats plus 4 flats on land to rear LB Enfield  6‐10 years

Available 

N Y N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

built up area, swan annex of local architectural value. Ponders End lies within the London‐Cambridge‐Peterborough growth corridor for employment

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

no known abnormal costs Unknown.  0 10 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 based on density Developable n/a

CFS191 Call for Sites CFS191 Civic Centre  ‐ Town 1.41 Civic Centre (offices)

Mixed Uses

Urban area Existing buildinAcceptable proximity to local services. Redevelop

None known.  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information.

No known abnormal costs Unknown.  0 150 0 0Potentially achievable

n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 150 0 150 0 150 Based on initial feasibility testing.  Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirmation of satisfactory strategy to address existing uses / occupiers on site. 

CFS193 Call for sites CFS193 The Drill Hall ‐ Town 0.08 Sports Hall  Residential  Urban area Existing buildinAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Redevelop None known  6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aViability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information.

No known abnormal costs Unknown.  0 10 0 0Potentially achievable

n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 Based on initial capacity testing.  Potentially developableSubject to confirmation of satisfactory strategy to address existing uses / occupiers on site. 

CFS194 Call for sites CFS194 Sydney road Car Park EN2 6TS  Enfield North 0.15 car park residential 

Car park adjoined by predominantly residential area backing onto Town Park

NoneAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residentialLB Enfield freehold

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable n/aSubject to whole plan viability and landowner information.

n/a

Unknown.  0 15 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15Block of 12‐14 flats arranged over 3 storeys or between 4‐6 houses arranged in a terrace or Mews.

Developable n/a

18/03009/FUL Planning Applicatio 18/03009/FUL Genotin Road Car Park,Genotin Road, Enfield EN1 2AG Town 0.36 car park offices mixed area n/a n/a

Erection of a five storey block of offices (B1a), ground floor business café (B1a/A3) and conference space (B1a/D1), with basement level,ground floor car parking, landscaping and ancillary works.

unknown n/a

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N SuitablePrinciple of development established through permission

n/a n/a n/a 0 0 0 0 Achievable n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ n/a DeliverableConstruction started in May 2019. Still under construction in January 2021.

CFS218 Call for sites CFS218 Lion Road Car Park ,Church Street, N9 9DYLower Edmonton

0.05 car park  residential suburban housing

none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

High Density Apartment scheme unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

no known abnormal costs Unknown.  0 10 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 surburban area‐ 2 storey= 10 flats Developable n/a

CFS198‐1 Call for sites CFS198‐1Kenninghall Open Space South,Kenninghall Road, London, N18 2PE

N18 2PEEdmonton Green 

1.85

Open Space, Car Park a

Opportunity fosuburban housing

Ground contamAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Opportunity for mixed use development including relocation of Community Uses from Montagu Industrial Estate onto existing car parks, integration of the Open Space with the Shires redevelopment, and additional /improved industrial workspace. Or a location for temporary pitches for Gypsy/Romat/Traveller caravans.

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N Y N N N Y Y N N N N N Not suitableSite is designated local open space. It also contains a large number of high quality trees and has potential ecological value. It is also identified in the North London Waste Plan protection for Recycling capacity.

n/a abmormal costs Unknown.  0 0 0 0 Unachievable n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ n/a Not developable within the neNorth London Waste Plan protection for Recycling capacity. 

CFS221 Call for sites CFS221John Wilkes House, 79 High Street, Enfield, EN3 4EN

EN3 4EN Southgate 0.09 offices mixed useLocated on mixed use high street

Tightly constraAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Opportunity for either Community Use (Wedding Venue) displaced from current unsuitable location on Industrial Estate, residential redevelopment, Retail or Showroom or Offices. Offices as vaccination Hub, showroom or commercial offices or > 15 flats

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/aAdjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

no known abnormal costsbetter suited to mixed use residential 

0 15 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15flatted development, edge of high street

Developable n/a

CFS222 Call for sites CFS222 Orchard Road Car Park,Orchard Road, Enfield  EN3 4PH   Ponders End 0.03 car park  residential  Built up area 

none known

Acceptable proximity to local services.  residential 

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

no known abnormal costs Unknown.  0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS223 Call for sites CFS223Stable Yard Broomfield Park, Broomfield Lane, London 

N13 4HEPalmers Green

0.3

Disused Parks depot an

>15 and <25 reBuilt up area 

access not dire

Acceptable proximity to local services. 

>15 and <25 residential units set out in a Mews/Courtyard development with potential community use in stable block

Legal issues concerning Broomfield covenant, access not directly from highway, Historic England potential objection on scale of development. Listed status of Stable Block and House. 

6‐10 years

Available 

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N Y N N N N Y N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is within a SINC and local open space

public park. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

abnormal costs associated with conversion of listed stables.

Unknown.  0 15 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 more suited to terraced housing Not developable within the ne

Significant heritage value would indicate a sensitive approach to restoration of the existing buildings are required. The site is located within a local open space. 

CFS224 Call for sites CFS224Camlet Way land North, Crescent East, Enfield

EN4 0LJ Cockfosters 0.97

open space

residential suburban housing

Building over T

Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Single large house or >6 large flats 

 Legal issue with Covenant precluding development. Likely Duchy of Lancaster consent required.

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site has a local open space designation.

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 suburban area Potentially developable The site is a designated local open space 

CFS225 Call for sites CFS225Camlet Way Land South, Camlet Way, Enfield 

EN4 0LJ Cockfosters 0.81

open space

residential suburban housing

none known

Acceptable proximity to local services.  residential 

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site has a local open space designation.

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 6 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 suburban area Potentially developable The site is a designated local open space 

LP637 Call for Sites LP637 Land north of Goat Lane ‐ Chase 0.46 Grassland Residential Low density dwellings 

Unknown con

Close proximity to local amenities 

Develop Unknown 6‐10 years; 11‐

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially SuitableLocated within Green Belt.  In Grade 3 agricultural land. Soil surveys required to establish whether in Grade 3a. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

None known.  None known.  0 0 60 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 60 0 60 0 60

Case study: Ryle Yard. Height assumption: 5 storeys. 20% of site excluded due to need for access and open space on site. 

Potentially developableCould be considered developable subject to confirming viability and review of policy constraints. 

CFS201 Call for sites CFS201 Ford's Grove Car Park, Ford's Grove, Enfield  N21 3DNWinchmore Hill

0.24 car park 

>40 flats over 

Built up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential  unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 24 0 0 Achievable 3.3 Terrace ‐ Townhouse 100 ‐ ‐ 24 0 24 0 24 Developable n/a

CFS228 Call for sites CFS228 Portcullis Car Park  Silver Street  EN1 3EJ Enfield North 0.06 car park 

The site is put 

Built up area  unknownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

The site is put forward as part of a land swap arrangement to facilitate future housing development elsewhere within the boundary of the school playing fields, but in a better place to locate it than the current car park.

unknown 6‐10 years 

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Not suitableSite is within school playing fields. Will draw objections from sport england

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 18 0 0 Unachievable N/A ‐ Not assessed for housing Not developable within the neSite is proposed for a land swap arrangement rather than development. 

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

CFS229 Call for sites CFS229Little Park Gardens Bus Garage / Stand, Little Park Gardens, Enfield

 EN2 6PG Town 0.07 BUS TERMINUS residential Built up area  bus turning cirAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential  unknown 6‐10 years

Potentially Availab

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableSite is currently in operational use to support sustainable travel. Not considered appropriate for housing. 

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 8 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 suburban area Potentially developableSite is currently in operational use to support sustainable travel. Not considered appropriate for housing. 

CFS204 Call for sites CFS204 Lodge Drive Car Park Palmers Green including depot

N13 5LBPalmers Green

0.73 car park and small workPotential to reBuilt up area  constraints unAcceptable proximity to local services. 

The site has potential for residential development of 95 units if the present use can be changed.  

unknown 6‐10 years

Available 

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 18 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 69 ‐ ‐ 50 0 50 0 18 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS231 Call for sites CFS231

Bullsmoor Library, 58 Kempe Rd, Enfield 

EN1 4QS Turkey Street 0.3 Car Park Library and Coresidential  Built up area  There is a subsAcceptable proximity to local services. 

The site area is based on the adjacent Community Centre and derelict garages.

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

no abnormal costs Unknown.  0 10 0 0 Achievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion 102 ‐ ‐ 31 0 31 0 31 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS228 Call for sites CFS228 1‐3 Gentlemans Row, Enfield  EN2 6PT  Town 0.24 Registry office. 8‐ 12 apartme Built up area  Attractive builAcceptable proximity to local services. 

8‐ 12 apartments for residential conversion or ground floor office/restaurant with 6 flats above or hotel (30‐40 beds), 

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N Y

Include n/a

N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site contains a Grade II* listed building and therefore limited suitability for increased capacity.  Adjacent housing, viability subject 

to Whole Plan Viabilityabnormal costs associated with conversion.

Grade II listed building, additional consents will be required.

0 0 0 0Potentially achievable

‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 hotel + 12 apartments  Not developable within the ne8‐ 12 apartments for residential conversion/ground floor office/restaurant with 6 flats above/hotel (30‐40 beds), 

LP1152 Call for sites LP1152 Park Avenue Day Centre, 65c Park Avenue, Bush Hill Park, Enfield

 EN1 2HL Bush Hill Park  0.26 Adult Day Care Centre  30‐40 flats‐ ov Built up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

30‐40 flats‐ over 3 storeys unknown 6‐10 years

Available 

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Adjacent housing, viability subject to Whole Plan Viability

no abnormal costs Unknown.  0 30 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete 162 ‐ ‐ 42 0 42 0 42 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS139 Call for sites CFS139 Harbet Road Industrial Estate, Harbet Road  N18 3HTUpper Edmonton

19.5 Industrial and commer Develop resideBrownfield land

Numerous conAcceptable proximity to local services. Approximately 3,000 residential units/ Approximately 

34,000 sq.m (GEA) of office and light industrial

Site in multiple ownerships. 

6‐10 years

Potentially availab

Partial N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N Y N N N N N Y N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Approx 60% of site covered with SIL designation; 25% within Green Belt; 25% in LVRP;  75% in Flood Risk Zone 2Site is located within SIL, but proposed for mixed use intensification. Housing component would make it only 'potentially suitable' in this location. 

Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability and landowner information. 

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities, social infrastructure etc. 

Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

0 0 529 1098Potentially achievable

4.4. Linear block ‐ Courtyard 232 ‐ ‐ 1627 0 1627 0 1627 n/a Potentially developable

Aspirations would lead to a net loss of employment floorspace (more than 34,000 sq m of employment floorspace on site at present). Part of an intensification study

CFS143 Call for sites CFS143

Depot Site at Barrowell Hill  N21 3ARWinchmore Hill

0.21 Depot residential ‐ca SMINC (part) none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Site leased to the Environment Agency

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N Potentially suitable

Part of site is SMINC

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 0 15 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 surburban area Potentially developable

Site has a number of environmental constraints. Mitigation would be required in order to consider development in this location acceptable. 

CFS145 Call for sites CFS145

Land adjacent to New River north of Hoe Lane PS, Goat Lane 

EN1 4UF

Enfield North 1.6 Thames Water operatioresidential  SMINC Appears to be Acceptable proximity to local services.  residential 

Thames Water operational land

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N Potentially suitable

Thames water operational land

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 0 50 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 50 0 50 0 50 Potentially developable

Site has a number of environmental constraints. Mitigation would be required in order to consider development in this location acceptable. 

CFS150 Call for sites CFS150

Alan Pullinger Centre, 1 John Bradshaw Road, Southgate 

N14 6BT

Southgate 0.11 Youth centre residential  Built up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services.  residential 

LBE owned 6‐10 years

Available 

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 48 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 48 0 48 0 48 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS152 Call for sites CFS152

Claverings, Centre Way, London  N9 0AHLower Edmonton

2.41 Claverings Industrial EsMixture of emBuilt up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services.  employment uses

LBE owned, possible leasehold issues.

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Site is LSIS, but proposed for mixed use including residential therefore only potentially suitable. 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Hydrocarbon contamination likely/possible

Unknown.  0 587 0 0Potentially achievable

n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 587 ‐ 587 ‐ 587Based on mixed use typology estimate of site. 

Potentially developable

Site is located within LSIS. Potentially developable subject to confirmation of viability and acceptable design for mixed use. 

CFS158 Call for sites CFS158

Owls Hall Estate, Cattlegate Road EN2 8AX

Chase 53 agricultural land/ residemixed use resi countryside Owls Hall is Gr

Lack of proximity to local amenities  residential 

Site in single leasehold ownership

6‐10 years

Available

Y N N Y N N N N Y

IncludeLocated within Green Belt. Small parts in FZ2 and 3‐ would limit type of use. 

Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableSite is located within the Green Belt. It also has a number of other constraints, including partial areas of Flood Risk and contains a Grade II listed building.

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

abnormal costs associated with flood mitigation and listecd building conversion

Unknown.  0 600 600 0Potentially achievable

3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 600 0 600 0 1200Small food store/2FE Primary School/Allotments

Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. 

CFS159 Call for sites CFS159

Wyevale Garden Centre, Cattlegate Road EN2 9DX

Chase 2 garden centre residential Edge of urban area 

Located withinAcceptable proximity to local services.  residential 

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

Y N N N N N N N N

IncludeLocated within Green Belt. Smal parts in FZ2 and 3. 

Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt.

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  0 120 0 0Potentially achievable

3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 120 0 120 0 120 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. 

CFS160 Call for Sites CFS160

Land surrounding Crews Hill station, Broad Location

EN2 9DS

Chase

303

Mix of uses including agAround 6,000  Built up area  Parts of site inAcceptable proximity to local services. 

New sustainable settlement at land surrounding Crews Hill station. This would be a residential‐led, mixed‐use development comprising around 6,000 new homes composed in a self‐contained settlement with community facilities, ecological improvements, and new and improved transport infrastructure.

Various and complex landownership structure to the east of the railway line. To the west of the railway line land is primarily within ownership of LB Enfield and Silverdale One (Limited).

10‐15 years

Availability Unknow

partial Y Y N N N N N N

Includemitigation and other measures included to make the development sustainable

N Y N N Partial N Y N y N N N Y N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt. It also has a number of other constraints, including partial areas of Flood Risk.

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

infrastructure costs  Amendments to utilities required.  0 0 1576 3272Potentially achievable

n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 4848 0 4848 0 4848

Based on appropriate net developable area and appropriate density. Gross density would range from between 20 dph to 100 dph. Higher densities focused around Crews Hill station to create critical mass of people to support sustainable travel patterns and new centre. Employment uses would be up to c.20,000 sqm (GEA) of light industrial (likely co‐located) and up to c.7,500 sqm (GEA) of retail for a new horticulture centre and 4,400sqm of office (B1a).

Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. 

CFS165

Call for sites CFS165‐ linked to CFS1

South‐east corner of the North Middlesex UniversityHospital Trust of Sterling Way, London

N18 1QX

Edmonton Green 

1.37 NHS trust facilities and residential led Built up area  Asbestos in exAcceptable proximity to local services.  residential led development and need for relocation of 

existing services.

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Includeunclear which part is relocation of existing use?

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 400 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 400 0 400 0 400 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS166 Call for sites CFS166

Tesco, Ponders End, 288 High Street, Enfield EN3 4DP

Ponders End 2.95 food store Residential‐ledBuilt up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services.  residential led redevelopment

All those with interest in land unaware. 

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

submission suggested capacity for c.1,000 new homes with redevelopment of the nearby Royal Mail site

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unkown 0 350 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 350 ‐ ‐ suburban area Developablesubmission suggested capacity for c.1,000 new homes with redevelopment of the Royal Mail site

CFS169 Call for sites CFS169

Kings Oak Equestrian Centre EN2 9BL

Chase 4.23 Equestrian centre residential Edge of urban area 

Green Belt and

Lack of proximity to local amenities  residential 

lease remaining

6‐10 years

Availability unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unkown 0 127 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 127 0 127 0 127Capacity estimated on basis of 30dph

Potentially developable Located within Green Belt. 

CFS174 Call for sites CFS174

Sunbeam Stud EN2 9JE

Chase 2.061 Horse breeding and staresidential  countryside Green Belt des

Lack of proximity to local amenities  residential 

unknown 11‐15 years

Availability unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 61 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 61 0 61 0 61 suburban area Potentially developableAdjacent to Anglo aquatic centre which has also been submitted. 

CFS162 Call for sites CFS162

Land to the rear of 66 The Ridgeway EN2 8JA

Highlands 0.903 Vacant field  Residential anEdge of urban area 

Green Belt des

Lack of proximity to local amenities  residential 

unknown 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 36 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 36 0 36 0 36 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. 

CFS177 Call for sites CFS177

Arnold House, 66 The Ridgeway EN2 8JA

Highlands 1.33 Care home and wider gResidential anEdge of urban area 

Large number 

Lack of proximity to local amenities  residential 

unknown 0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 62 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 62 0 62 0 62 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. 

CFS178 Call for sites CFS178

Oak House, 43 Baker Street, EN1 3ET

Town 0.14 residential  50‐60 dwellingBuilt up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services.  residential 

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 55 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 55 0 55 0 55 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS179 Call for sites CFS179

Land rear of 69 & 71 Mapleton Crescent EN3 5RD

Turkey Street 0.14 Residential  residential  Built up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

Current leaseholder on site unaware of promotion. 

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableBack garden development is not considered suitable in line with the NPPF. 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 60 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 60 0 60 0 60 suburban area Potentially developableBack garden development is not considered suitable in line with the NPPF. 

CFS180 Call for sites CFS180

No 10‐100 Fraser Road  N9 0BX

Edmonton Green 

0.115 gardens residential  Built up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

Current leaseholder on site unaware of promotion, there are 4 different owners

6‐10 years

Availability Unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Back garden development is not considered suitable in line with the NPPF. 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 7 0 0 Achievable 3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 suburban area Potentially developable

Back garden development is not considered suitable in line with the NPPF. 

CFS181 Call for sites CFS181

Alma House 301 Alma Road Enfield EN3 7BB EN3 7BB

Ponders End 0.25 Light Industrial + warehResidenital/emBuilt up area  none knownAcceptable proximity to local services. 

mixed use residential 

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable Site is a single piecemeal site being proposed for mixed use development within LSIS. Not deemed appropriate. 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 46 0 0Potentially achievable

3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single a ‐ ‐ ‐ 46 0 46 0 46 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is a single piecemeal site being proposed for mixed use development within LSIS. Not deemed appropriate in absence of a wider masterplan for comprehensive development. 

CFS186 Call for sites CFS186

Fair field Road car park  N18 2QPEdmonton Green 

0.062 car park  10 units or 155Built up area  Shared acess, Acceptable proximity to local services.  10 units or 155 sqm commerial space

unknown 6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 10 0 0 Achievable 4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimete ‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS199‐8 Call for sites CFS199‐8

108 ‐ 112 Palmerston Crescent, Palmers Green, Enfield.

N13 4NH

Palmers Green

0.16 Vegetated land with soresidential  Built up area  Site is not alloAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

TFL  0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

Site is not allocated within any ecological designations. Site's western boundary is adjacent to the New River, and the river embankment is designated as follows: Wildlife Corridor, Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation, Local Open Space, Green Chain Corridor.

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 7 0 0 Achievable3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single aspect

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS199‐9 Call for sites CFS199‐9

Land at Palmerston Crescent and Bowes Road, Palmers Green, Enfield, 

N13 4UN

Palmers Green

0.25 Vegetated land with soresidential  Built up area  Site is not alloAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

TFL  0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

Site is not allocated within any ecological designations. Site's western boundary is adjacent to the New River, and the river embankment is designated as follows: Wildlife Corridor, Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation, Local Open Space, Green Chain Corridor.

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 18 0 0Potentially achievable

3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single aspect

‐ ‐ ‐ 18 0 18 0 18 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS207 Call for sites CFS207

Albany Leisure Centre and Car Park, 55 Albany Road, Enfield 

EN3 5XH

Enfield Highway

0.6283 leisure centre care home / shBuilt up area  part MOLAcceptable proximity to local services. 

care home/ sheltered housing

LB Enfield ‐ freehold‐Management Agreement between Fusion Lifestyle and LB Enfield for the operation of the leisure centre

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N Partial N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Part of site extent is designated MOL 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 30 0 0 Achievable3.1. Terrace ‐ Mews single aspect

‐ ‐ ‐ 30 ‐ 30 ‐ 30 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS208 Call for sites CFS208

Land North of Waggon Road, Chase and Slopers Pond Farm, Stagg Hill 

EN4 0HL

Cockfosters 9.508 agricultural land  residential  countryside GB

Lack of proximity to local amenities  residential 

Enfield Council ‐ freehold. Leased to the farmer 

0‐5 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include

The building is part of Natural Englands Countryside Stewarship Scheme ‐ educational schools access to the countryside

Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 53 53 53 Achievable4.2. Linear block ‐ Perimeter block without podium

‐ ‐ ‐ 53 0 53 0 53 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. Green Belt isolated location. 

CFS211 Call for sites CFS211

Bulls Cross NurseryBulls Cross, Enfield 

EN2 9HE 

Chase 0.685 green waste Residential, Emcountryside Green Belt & L

Lack of proximity to local amenities 

residential mixed use

LBE own freehold . Leased to the tenant with 3 years remaining

0‐5 years

Availability unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include

the adjacent site could form part of the development. Adjacent derelict garages and adjacent land(SPS Ref. CFS44)

Y Y N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 79 0 0 Achievable n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 79 0 79 0 79 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. Isolated Green Belt location. 

CFS212 Call for sites CFS212

Botany Bay Cricket Club, East Lodge Lane, Enfield 

EN2 8AS

Chase 3.08 cricket and rugby club residential  Built up area  Green Belt & LAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

Enfield Council ‐ freehold. Let to club with 99 years remaining

11‐15 years

Availability unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 100 100 50 Achievable n/a ‐ ‐ 100 0 100 0 250 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. Isolated Green Belt location. 

CFS213 Call for sites CFS213

Enfield Lawn Tennis Club, 26 Woodridge Close, Enfield 

EN2 8HJ

Highlands 0.5863 tennis club residential  Built up area  local open spaAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

Enfield Council ‐ freehold. Leased to the tennis club until 2046.

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 15 0 0 Achievable n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 suburban area Developable n/a

CFS214 Call for sites CFS214

North Lodge Farm Buildings South, North Lodge Farm, The Ridgeway, 

EN2 8AF

Chase 0.8968 farm buildings residential  Built up area  GBAcceptable proximity to local services. 

residential 

Enfield Council freehold. Leased to the farmer with 3 years remaining

0‐5 years

Availability unknow

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Site is located within the Green Belt 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 22 0 0 Achievable n/a ‐ ‐ ‐ 22 0 22 0 22 suburban area Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of planning policy constraints. 

CFS215 Call for sites CFS215

Church Lane Car Park & 58‐60 Silver Street, Enfield,  

EN1 3EJ

Chase 0.195 offices and car park Conversion of Built up area  Grade 2 ListedAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Conversion of listed buildings at 58/60 plus infill at first floor level and terraced Mews on car park site and sensitive development at rear of 58/60 silver street. 6‐8 flats in 58/60 plus new block to rear , say 6 flats, plus Mews terrace in car park say 6 houses.

LBE freehold 6‐10 years

Available

N Y N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Grade II listed building ‐conversion to residential.

Subject to whole plan viability and landowner information.

grade II listed building conversion‐ costs associated

Unknown 0 18 0 0 Unachievable 4.3. Linear block ‐ Mansion ‐ ‐ ‐ 18 0 18 0 18capacity estimate conservative given its listed building status. 

Not developable within the ne

Existing building has heritage value. 

CFS116 Call for sites CFS116/ LP1161

Land SW Green Lanes Junction N13 6SP

Bowes 0.3 1‐7 Bowes Road is vacaHousing, healtEdge of urban area 

The access roaAcceptable proximity to local services. 

Housing, health centre, and commercial units

Nos. 147 to 149 Green Lanes are outside of NHG’s ownership. 

6‐10 years

Potentially Availab

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Suitable

n/a

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

new access road unknown 0 100 57 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ 157 0 157 0 ‐ n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

20/00840/FUL Planning Applicatio 20/00840/FUL24 ‐ 26 Churchbury Lane, EN1 3TY

Town 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission unknown 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08548068 Planning Applicatio PP‐08548068464 Wickham House, Lincoln Road EN3 4AH

Ponders End n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08644103 Planning Applicatio PP‐086441031A Oak Avenue And 158 The Ridgeway EN2 8LB

Highlands 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08682627 Planning Applicatio PP‐08682627292 ‐ 308 Southbury Road EN1 1TS

Southbury 0.18 n/a ‐ principle of develChange of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 63 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 63 0 63 0 63 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08601612 Planning Applicatio PP‐086016121‐39 Haslam Court, Waterfall Road N11 1NJ

Southgate Green

0.46 n/a ‐ principle of develCreation of a r

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 8 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08688340 Planning Applicatio PP‐08688340Industrial Premises,5 ‐ 7 Old Park Avenue EN2 6PJ

Winchmore Hill

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08623534 Planning Applicatio PP‐08623534265 High Street EN3 4DW

Ponders End 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of develReconfiguratio

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08666917 Planning Applicatio PP‐08666917Rear Of 255‐257 Green Lanes N13 4XE

Enfield Highway

0.21 n/a ‐ principle of develSub‐division o

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a y 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 0 0 0 0 0 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08777394 Planning Applicatio PP‐08777394Maze Inn, 7 Chase Side N14 5BP

Chase 0.24 n/a ‐ principle of develErection of a 3

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 48 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 48 0 48 0 48 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08746655 Planning Applicatio PP‐08746655357 Cockfosters Road EN4 0JT

Enfield Lock 0.41 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 24 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 24 0 24 0 24 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08813894 Planning Applicatio PP‐0881389446 Eversley Park Road N21 1JS

Grange 0.05 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08820740 Planning Applicatio PP‐08820740Bush Hill Park Bowls Tennis And Social Club, abbey Road 

EN1 2QPBush Hill Park  0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Sub‐division o

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08780079 Planning Applicatio PP‐08780079364 Green Lanes N13 5XL

Palmers Green

0.73 n/a ‐ principle of develChange of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08820841 Planning Applicatio PP‐08820841‐ FULRedwood House, 33 London Road EN2 6DR

Town 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of develConstruction o

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

PP‐08715061 Planning Applicatio 15/04547/FULFormer Chase Farm Hospital, The Ridgeway EN2 8JL

Highlands 15.7 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 344 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 344 0 482 138 344 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio PP‐08836142‐ PA

104‐110, Fore Street, Edmonton N18 2XAUpper Edmonton

0.07 n/a ‐ principle of develChange of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/00868/FUL 864‐866 Hertford Road EN3 6UDTurkey Street 0.039 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02041/FUL 221 Holtwhites Hill EN2 8BXEnfield North 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 8 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02183/OA 26‐28 Brownlow Road  N11 2DEBowes n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 23 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 23 0 23 0 23 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02188/FUL 168 ‐ 194 Hertford Road EN3 5AZJubilee 0.18 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Construction o

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02285/FUL Commercial Premises, 40 Church Street EN2 6AZGrange 0.026 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Conversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02422/FUL 137 Bullsmoor Lane EN3 6THTurkey Street 0.036 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02628/FUL 510 Hertford Road EN3 5SSTurkey Street 0.23 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Part redevelop

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02710/FUL 23 ‐25 Crescent East EN4 0EYCockfosters 0.38 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 52 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 52 0 52 0 52 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/02981/FUL Land To The Rear Of 133 Chase Road N14 4JPSouthgate 0.1 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03003/FUL 50 Slades Hill EN2 7EEHighlands 0.099 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03305/FUL 47 Bowes House & 95,95A & 97, Russell Road

N134UQBowes 0.17 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Creation of 7N

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03199/PAB 1A North Road, The old stables N9 7QXHighlands 0.009 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Change of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 8 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 8 0 8 0 8 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03407/FUL 59 Main Avenue,  EN1 1DSSouthbury 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 12 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 12 0 12 0 12 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03530/FUL Land End, 18 And Bush Hill Cottage, 20 Bush Hill

N21 2BXBush Hill Park 0.54 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Construction o

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 29 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 29 0 29 0 29 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03585/FUL 185B Town Road N9 OHLLower Edmonton

0.055 n/a ‐ principle of develDemolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03914/PRJ Blocks A‐H And Solar House, 282 ‐288 Chase Road

N14 6HASouthgate 0.54 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Change of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 74 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 74 0 74 0 74 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

20/03993/FUL 37 Lancaster Avenue EN4 0ERCockfosters 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

21/00124/FUL Land Adjacent 62 Carpenter Gardens N21 3HGEnfield Highway

0.21 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

21/00291/FUL 828 ‐ 832 Green Lanes N21 2RTPalmers Green

0.041 n/a ‐ principle of develFirst floor rear

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

21/00348/FUL 2 Donkey Lane EN1 3PLSouthbury 0.043 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

21/01140/FUL Public House,Green Street EN3 7SHPalmers Green

0.13 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 18 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 18 0 18 0 18 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio

21/01202/PRJ Triangle House, 305 ‐ 313 Green Lanes N13 4YBPalmers Green

0.11 n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 15 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 15 0 15 0 15 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

Tbc Planning Applicatio20/01354/FUL

130 Hertford Road

EN3 5AXEnfield Highway

0.043 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permissionNone known 0‐5 years

Available‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio

16/01452/FUL 21 And Rear Of 23 And 25Lancaster AvenueBarnet

EN4 0EP

Cockfosters 0.27 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission none known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio

16/01512/PRJ Unit 122 Bull LaneLondon

N18 1RA

Upper Edmonton

0.043 n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission none known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio

16/01925/FUL Land Adjacent To62 Carpenter GardensLondon

N21 3HG

Winchmore Hill

DUPLICATE, SEE NO. 35

n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission none known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBCPlanning Applicatio 16/02284/FUL

4 Lincoln RoadEnfield

EN1 2RYBush Hill Park 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/02572/FUL

17 Wentworth GardensLondon

N13 5SW

Palmers Green

0.05 n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/03137/FUL

10 Ridgemount GardensEnfield

EN2 8QLHighlands 0.21 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/03250/FUL

Public House 1‐3 Northampton RoadEnfield

EN3 7UL

Ponders End 0.019 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/03462/FUL

1‐2 White House Farm CottagesWaterfall CloseLondon N14 7JP

Southgate 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of develDemoliton of e

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/00076/FUL

Public House1 High Street

EN3 4EJPonders End 0.12 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/01415/FUL

49 Scotland Green RoadEnfield

EN3 4REPonders End 0.06 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/05536/FUL

Repair GarageGarfield RoadEnfield

EN3 4RP

Ponders End 0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/05580/FUL

Wellington House 3 Wellington RoadEnfield

EN1 2PB

Bush Hill Park 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/05718/FUL

Land R/o 8‐10 Crescent Road Enfield, EN2 7BL And 88‐90 Old Park ViewEnfield

EN2 7EH 

Highlands 0.22 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/04444/FUL

266 Chase SideLondon

N14 4PRCockfosters 0.09 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/04881/FUL

Garages Adjacent ToTiptree DriveEnfield

EN2 6TY

Grange 0.098 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/05200/FUL

53 Palmers RoadLondon

N11 1RJ

Southgate Green

0.04 n/a ‐ principle of develDemolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/05389/OA

Sir Thomas Lipton Memorial HospitalOsidge151 Chase SideSouthgateLondon

N14 5HE

Southgate Green

n/a ‐ principle of devel

Demolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 16 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 16 0 16 0 16 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/05532/FUL

Land R/o 8‐10 Crescent Road Enfield, EN2 7BL And 88‐90 Old Park ViewEnfield

EN2 7EH

Enfield NorthDUPLICATE SEE NO. 53

n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/01088/FUL

82 The Ridgeway And 7 Farona WalkEnfield

EN2 8JQHighlands 0.2 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/02630/FUL

135‐137  Bowes RoadLondon

N13 4SE

Southgate Green

0.033 n/a ‐ principle of develDemolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 14 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 14 0 14 0 14 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/03030/FUL

30A,B,C Brettenham RoadLondon

N18 2EU

Edmonton Green 

0.016 n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 11 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 11 0 11 0 11 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 16/03131/FUL

Repair GarageGarfield RoadEnfield

EN3 4RP

Ponders EndDUPLICATE SEE NO. 51

n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 7 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 7 0 7 0 7 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/00219/FUL

Rear Of Ashleigh Court And 2 Avenue RoadLondon

N14 4EJ

Southgate Green

0.14 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Erection of 4 r

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/01819/FUL Bushberry Lodge, 91 Wellington Road EN1 2PWBush Hill Park 0.08 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Conversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 10 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/01918/FUL

8 ‐10 Church StreetEnfield

EN2 6BEGrange

DUPLICATE SEE ROW ABOVE

n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/02148/HOU

72 Nags Head RoadEnfield

N3 7APPonders End 0.03 n/a ‐ principle of devel

NEW 1 X 2 BED

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 72 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 72 0 72 0 72 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/02192/FUL

13, 13A And 15 Avenue RoadLondon

N14 4DACockfosters 0.048 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Conversion of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/03156/FUL

Garages Adjacent To 10 Cedar AvenueEnfield

EN3 7JB

Enfield Highway

0.077 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Change of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/03311/FUL

106A Fox LaneLondon

N13 4AX

Southgate Green

0.043 n/a ‐ principle of develRedevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/03725/FUL

32 Fox LaneSouthgate

N13 4AH

Winchmore Hill

n/a ‐ principle of devel5 self containe

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/04032/OUT

Social Club169‐171 Fore StreetLondon

N18 2XB

Upper Edmonton

0.021 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Outline applic

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/04839/FUL

Land Use For Storage10 Park RoadLondon

N18 2YS

Edmonton Green 

0.087 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 25 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 25 0 25 0 25 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/05189/FUL

805 Green LanesLondon

N21 2SG

Winchmore Hill

0.039 n/a ‐ principle of develConversion an

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 17/05235/FUL

115 South StreetEnfield

EN3 4PXPonders End 0.055 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 19 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 19 0 19 0 19 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 18/00128/FUL

Land To The Rear Of 10‐18 Church Street London

N9 9DX

Edmonton Green 

0.036 n/a ‐ principle of develCreation of fir

n/a‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 5 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 5 0 5 0 5 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 18/01211/FUL

Land At The Rear Of Elm Park RoadLondon

N21 2HPBush Hill Park 0.07 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 18/01352/PRJ

Northside HouseMount Pleasant

EN4 9EECockfosters 0.13 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Change of use

n/a‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 23 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 23 0 23 0 23 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 18/03393/PRJ

2 ‐ 6 Silver StreetEnfield

EN1 3EETown 0.02 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Change of use

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 18/03508/FUL

Royal British Legion Club Holtwhites HillEnfield

EN2 0RX

Town 0.26 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 10 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 18/03658/FUL

Land Adjacent To12 Victoria RoadLondon

N18 2UF

Edmonton Green 

0.038 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Sub‐division o

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 19/00412/FUL

Land To Rear Of Pumping StationAnd Adjacent To 62 Carpenter GardensLondon

N21 3HH

Winchmore Hill

0.21 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Erection of a t

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 10 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 10 0 10 0 10 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 19/00620/FUL254 Bowes Road

N11 2JH

Southgate Green

n/a ‐ principle of develDemolition of 

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 56 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 56 0 56 0 56 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 19/01779/FUL

Car ParkTudor WayLondon

N14 6PS

Southgate 0.042 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 9 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 9 0 9 0 9 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverable

n/a

TBC Planning Applicatio 19/04385/FUL

391 Cockfosters RoadBarnet

EN4 0JSCockfosters 0.27 n/a ‐ principle of devel

Redevelopmen

n/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 14 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

‐ ‐ ‐ 14 0 14 0 14 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

SBC7

Planning Applicatio LP659, 20/00788/OUT

Colosseum Retail ParkDearsley Road Enfield

EN1 3FD

Southbury

4.21

n/a ‐ principle of devel Residential ann/a ‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

IncludePrinciple of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Demolition of existing buildings, and reprovision of existing uses in addition to housing. 

Site has hybrid planning permission, subject to S106. Likely that homes will come forward within 0‐5 years. Delivery rate may be restricted due to site size. 

516 516 555 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

378 ‐ ‐ 1587 0 1587 0 1587Figures taken from granted planning application

Deliverable

Site now has planning permission ‐ subject to S106. 

TBC Planning Applicatio 20/00573/FUL

40 Oakfield GardensLondonN18 1NX N18 1NX

Haselbury0.01

n/a ‐ principle of develConversion of 

n/a‐ consent granted

n/a ‐ consent gn/a ‐ consent granted

As per permission None known 0‐5 yearsAvailable

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐Include

Principle of development established through permission

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

n/a n/a 6 0 0 0 Achievableprinciples of development assesed through planning permission

6 0 6 0 6 n/a ‐ based on permission Deliverablen/a

tbc Call for sites CFS253 Southbury Leisure Park Enfield 

EN1 1YQ Southbury

2.95

cinema‐ cineworld

residential 

Urban Area The site has a acceptable proximity to local services. 

Residential/ Commercial ‐Potential for in excess of 750 residential units and 1,000 sqm of commercial floorspace

Royal London Mutual Insurance Society Limited ‐ long leaseholder

6‐10 years

Available

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Include n/a

‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ Suitable n/a 0 450 0 0 Achievable ‐ ‐ ‐ 450 450 450 Developable

n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites: Residential and Mixed Use

TBC

Call for sites CFS217

Land known as Brimsdown Sports Ground, Goldsdown Road, Enfield, 

EN3 7RN

Enfield Highway

8.08 Disused sports piches Mixed Use  Urban Area

Ground contamination, secondary access requirements for major development, legal issues with unexpired lease c.20 years.

Acceptable proximity to local services. 

mixed used cf

Development will be brought forward pending resolution of lease negotiations with current tenant within the next 5 years.

6‐10 years

Available

N N N N N N N N N

Include n/a

N N N N N N N N N y N N N N N Suitable

capacity tbc

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  unknown 0 0 0 0 Achievable n/s ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ suburban area Developable n/a

London Borough of Enfield  Housing and Economic Land Availability Assessment (HELAA) Appendix E: Full Assessment of Potential Sites Assessed Sites ‐ Economic Land

Capacity assumptions Overall Conclusion  Overall Conclusion Notes 

Flood Zone 3

Special Areas of 

Conservation 

Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI)

Special Protection Areas (SPA)

RAMSAR sites

National Nature Reserves

Ancient Woodlands 

Suitable Alternative Natural Green Space

Grade 1 and 2 

agricultural land

Include / Exclude following  Level 1 

criteria sift?

Notes Grade 3 Agricultural Land 

Green Belt / MOL 

Strategic Industrial Land 

Locally Significant Industrial Land 

Flood Risk Zone 2

Lee Valley Regional Park 

Scheduled Ancient Monume

nts 

Historic Parks and Gardens 

Contaminated land where 

mitigation would not

Local Open Space

Allotments 

Notified Safety Zones

Site of Importanc

e for Nature 

Conservat

Common Land 

Cemeteries

Overall Suitability Conclusion 

 Suitability Notes(Industry/Logistics)

(Office)(Other non‐residential

)

Y ‐ SA48 CFS132 Call for Sites CFS132

Land at 135 Theobalds Park Road,Crews Hill,Enfield,

EN2 9BB Chase 1.55

Residential dwelling, detached barn, and former horticulturalnursery land (with unimplemented planning permission).

industrial/retail use Built up area Trees on site are protected by TPOS. 

Acceptable proximity to local services. 

Provision of employment and services within Crews Hill. Up to 2,461 sq m of retail floorspace/Up to 3,251 sq m of industrial/employment.

none known 6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableSite is located within the Green Belt. 

Adjacent to existing housing. Viability subject to Whole Plan Viability. 

no known abnormal costs unknown Achievable 3250 ‐ 2461Based on indicative site layout provided with call for sites submission

Potentially developable

The site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints (Green Belt.) Any site allocation would also need to consider the existing TPOs protecting trees on site. 

Y ‐ SA54 CFS155 Call for sites CFS155Junction 24 (Part New Cottage and Holly Hill Farm) EN6 5QS

EN6 5QS Chase 11.08 Agricultural land  Employment/ industrial  Open countryside None known Lack of proximity to local amenities  employment/ industrial  LBE owned, leased to farmer 6‐10 years Potentially Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableSite is located within the Green Belt. 

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Potential infrastructure costs due to greenfield site.

Potential amendments to utilities required.  Achievable 30550 ‐ ‐ Based on 65% plot ratio Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints (Green Belt.)

N CFS160 Call for Sites CFS160Land surrounding Crews Hill station, Broad Location

EN2 9DS Chase 3.03

Mix of uses including agricultural land, golf course, garden centres, retail, and business uses.

Around 6,000 homes comprising a range of tenures and unit sizes (as well as homes with element of care i.e. C2 use).Maximum of c.20,000 sqm (GEA) of light industrial (Use Class E – formerly B1c).c.6,700 sqm of Class E Retail and leisure uses (formerly A1‐A5 & D2). c.7,500 sqm floorspace for Garden Centre (formerly use Class A1).Maximum of c.7,500 sqm office (GEA) (Use Class E – formerly B1a).Community and civic buildings, sports pavilions and pitches.8 Nursery schools.3 Primary schools (8FE total).1 Secondary school (7FE & 6th Form).Health Centre (i.e. GP Surgery, Dental surgery).Allotments/Community gardens

Built up area 

Parts of site in Flood Zone 2 and 3 associated with three main watercourses (the Cuffley, Turkey, and Hollyhill Brooks). However, development can be accommodated on land in Flood Zone 1 (i.e. lowest risk). Modelling has confirmed the development can be appropriately mitigated.M25, Cattlegate Road, and railway are the main sources of noise pollution across the site. A noise barrier would need to be installed along the M25 with other appropriate mitigation to reduce impact of noise pollution.M25 also is the main source of air pollution. Setbacks would need to be included and mitigation incorporated into the masterplan (i.e. tree planting to screen the M25 & appropriate layouts).Possibility of ground contamination given historical and current uses across the site. Potential for localised risk of ground gas but this would not preclude development.Listed buildings within and adjacent to site Conservation area south of

Acceptable proximity to local services. 

New sustainable settlement at land surrounding Crews Hill station. This would be a residential‐led, mixed‐use development comprising around 6,000 new homes composed in a self‐contained settlement with community facilities, ecological improvements, and new and improved transport infrastructure.

Various and complex landownership structure to the east of the railway line. To the west of the railway line land is primarily within ownership of LB Enfield and Silverdale One (Limited).

10‐15 years Potentially Available Partial Y y N N N N N N Include n/a N y N N Partial N Y N Y N N N Y N N Suitable n/aViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Potential infrastructure costs due to greenfield site.

Amendments to utilities required.  Achievable 20000 7500

max 6700 sqm Class E retail

max 7500sqm floorspace for garden centre uses; 

8 Nurseries, 3 Primary schools 

(8FE total), 1 

Secondary School, 

7FE & 6th form), health 

centre (i.e. GP surgery, 

dental surgery), allotments 

/ c ommunity

Based on landowner submission Potentially developable

Site is located within the Green Belt. Area submitted is a broad location, therefore land availability for entire area is not known. Suitability for employment uses in this location would need further testing for impacts on the transport network. Viability would need to be demonstrated for employment uses in specific locations within the broad area. Site is considered potentially developable, subject to above considerations. 

N LP1146 Call for sites LP1146Land south of William Girling Reservior, Lower Hall Lane, Chingford, 

E4 8JQ Edmonton Green  13.2

Northern Part of Site – waste use – soil and concrete recycling facility. Southern Part of Site – construction depot for North London Waste Authority.

B1, B2, B8, SG, waste Built up area  Partially within FZ3, GB, LVRP, SINC Lack of proximity to local amenities  B1, B2, B8, SG, waste

Freehold – Thames WaterNorthern Part of Site – leased to Camden Plant LtdSouthern Part of Site – leased to North London Waste Authority

6‐10 years Available Partial N N N N N N N NInclude with exclusions

10% in Flood Zone 3 N Y N N Y Y N N N N N N Y N N Potentially suitablePart of the site lies in FZ3 so the capacity will be reduced

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Infrastructure costs for developing road and utilities. FZ3 mitigation measures

unknown Achievable 53000 ‐ ‐ Based on landowner submission Potentially developable

Site lies within Flood Risk Zone 3 and has multiple environmental constraints. Site could be considered developable subject to review of planning policy constraints and appropriate mitigation. 

Y ‐ SA52 CFS140 Call for Sites CFS140

Land to the north of Mollison Avenue, south of the M25 and east of Freezywater(also known as Land west of Rammey Marsh)

EN3 7XQ Enfield Lock 10.88 Open space Employment/ industrial  Edge of urban area Potential contamination Acceptable proximity to local services. potential for 37,160 sq m ‐ 55,740 sq m

unknown 6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N N N N Y N N N N N N Potentially suitableSite is located within the Green Belt

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  Achievable 70200 ‐ ‐ Based on 65% plot ratio Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints (Green Belt.)

Y ‐ SA55 CFS148 Call for sites CFS148Land to North West of Innova Park, 

EN3 7XY Enfield Lock 3.2Thames Water operational land

Employment/ industrial  Edge of urban area Potential contamination  Acceptable proximity to local services.  employment/industrial

The site is owned by Kennet Properties Limited (KPL) ‐ subsidiary development company within the Thames Water group.

6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N Y N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitableSite is located within the GB, and the LVRP

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

None known.  Unknown.  Achievable 16445 ‐ ‐ Based on 65% plot ratio Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints.

Y ‐ SA53 POC5 Call for Sites LP694Navigation Park ‐ Carpark Ponders End, Enfield

EN3 4TA Ponders End 0.79 Car Park B1c/B2/B8  Mixed areaAccess and proximity to watercourse. 

Located within urban area. Lack of proximity to local amenities.

Develop for employment/industrial uses. 

None known.  6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N Partial N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

Partly in flood risk zone. Located within LVRP, Green Belt, designated local open space, adjacent to SMINC and close proximity to SSSI.

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Costs of flood risk mitigation and biodiversity mitigation. 

Constrained access may slow development.  Potentially achievable 5115 ‐ ‐ Based on 65% plot ratio Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints.

N CFS142 Call for sites CFS142Land adjacent to NW of William Girling Reservoir, Lee Valley Road,

 EN3 4TG Ponders End 1.21 Contractors depot Industrial/ employment waste Edge of urban area None knownLocated outside of urban area and some distance from amenities

Approx 6,825 sq mThames Water operational Reservoirs

6‐10 years Available N N Y N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N Y N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable GB, LVRP, close proximity to SSSI.Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Unknown abnormal costs. Potential additional costs to mitigate constraints. 

Potential access constraints. Potentially achievable 6825 ‐ ‐ Based on landowner submission Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints.

N CFS144 Call for sites CFS144Land adjacent to King George V Reservoir, Lea Valley Road 

Ponders End 2.5Thames Water operational land

Employment, industrial and waste Edge of urban area Access issues, pylons.Located outside of urban area and some distance from amenities

unknown unknown 6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N Y N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable GB, LVRP, SMINCViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Unknown abnormal costs. Potential additional costs to mitigate constraints. 

Potential access constraints. Potentially achievable 12350 ‐ ‐ Based on landowner submission Potentially developable

The site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints. There are a large number of environmental constraints on the site including nature conservation and flood risk. 

N CFS146 Call for sites CFS146Land at Wharf Road, Columbia End, Ponders End

EN3 4TG Ponders End 1.53Thames Water operational land

Employment/industrial  Edge of urban area Potential access constraints.Located outside of urban area and some distance from amenities

employment/ industrial  Thames Water operational land 6‐10 years Available N N Y N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N Y N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable

GB, designated local open space, part of LVRP, SMINC, within conservation area, close proximity to SSSI

Viability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Unknown abnormal costs. Potential additional costs to mitigate constraints. 

Potential access constraints. Potentially achievable 3575 ‐ ‐ Based on landowner submission Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints.

N CFS147 Call for sites CFS147Land at Wharf Road 2, Columbia End, Ponders End

EN3 4TG Ponders End 0.37Thames Water operational land

Employment/ industrial/ waste Edge of urban areaExisting trees on site. Potential access issues. 

Located outside of urban area and some distance from amenities

employment/ insutrial/ waste

Thames Water operational land 6‐10 years Available N N Y N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially suitable GB, SMINC, close proximity to SSSIViability assessed as part of Whole Plan Viability

Unknown abnormal costs. Potential additional costs to mitigate constraints. 

Potential access constraints. Potentially achievable 2240 ‐ ‐ Based on landowner submission Potentially developableThe site is potentially developable for the proposed use, subject to a review of the planning policy constraints.

Findings and Outcome

Owner / developer intentions 

Known Legal Issues Availability Period Overall availability 

conclusion 

Availability  Achievability

Market Factors  Cost Factor Dependencies Site and Delivery FactorsOverall Achievability 

Conclusion 

Level 1 Constraints Level 2 constraints

Suitability

Estimated Capacity sqm 

Site Allocation

?

Potential physical constraints, environmental constraints, 

access/highwaysCurrent Land Use Access to local services

Site Information 

Proposed UseSite SHLAA Reference

Site Source Reference 

Site name / address Ward  Site area (ha)Site Source  Postcode Character of existing area

London Borough of Enfield Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) Appendix D: Full Assessment of Potential Sites

Proposed Use Overall Conclusion  Overall Conclusion Notes Flood Zone  Special  Sites of  Special  RAMSAR  National  Ancient  Suitable  Grade 1 and  Include /  Notes  Grade 3  Green Belt  Strategic  Locally  Flood Risk  Lee Valley  Scheduled  Historic  Contamin Local  Allotment Notified  Site of  Common  Cemeterie Overall   Suitability Notes

LOC2 Call for Sites LP675 Land at Picketts Lock N9 0AS Lower Edmonton Ward 6.5 Cinema and adjacent land  Mixture of uses to complement existing  Mixed area Existing uses on site.  Located some distance from  Develop Long leasehold of Odeon cinema.  6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N Y N N N N N N N N N Potentially  100% in Green Belt and Lee Valley  Achievable Leisure uses Potentially developable Located within MOL, but in an area with CFS161 Call for sites CFS161 Whitewebbs Golf Course, Beggar's  EN2 9JN Chase Ward 43 Golf Course café, car parking, community facilities countryside Blue green infrastructure site  Lack of proximity to local  rewilding incorporating café,  unknown 6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N include n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N Y N N Potentially  Site located within GB Achievable Nature Recovery Potentially developable Located within Green Belt. Proposed uses POC2 Call for Sites LP1139 Alma Road Open Space  EN3 7BB Ponders End Ward 2.64 Open Space Care home Mixed area None known.  Located within urban area.  Develop None known 11‐15 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially  100% of site in designated MOL Achievable Cemetery Potentially developable Could be considered developable subject CFS168 Call for sites CFS168 Firs Farm Recreation Ground (Part)  N21 2JP Bush Hill Park 20.99 playing field and park  crematorium and Site to incorporate  Built up area  MOL Acceptable proximity to local  cremotorium and site to  LBE Freehold 0‐5 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include Y Y N N N N N N N Y N N N N N Potentially  Located within Green Belt.  Achievable Crematorium Potentially developable Located within the Green Belt. Proposed CFS171 Call for sites CFS171 Sloemans farm EN2 9HW Chase Ward 47.32 agricultural and Blue Green infrastructure site  countryside Green Belt designation. Possible  Lack of proximity to local  Blue Green infrastructure site  years remaining on lease 6‐10 years Potentially available N N N N N N N N N Include Blue Green infrastructure site  Y Y N N N N N N Y N N N Y N N Potentially  Located within Green Belt.  Achievable Natural burial Potentially developable Located within the Green Belt. Proposed CFS230 Call for sites CFS230 Church Street Recreation Ground  N9 9HH Town Ward 8.39 playing field and park   Site to incorporate improved café,  Built up area  playing fields/ Crematorium part  Acceptable proximity to local  Site to incorporate improved  unknown 6‐10 years Available  N N N N N N N N N Include n/a N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially  Located within MOL Achievable Crematorium Potentially developable Located within MOL. Proposed uses could CFS218 Call for Sites CFS218 Land at and within the vicinity of  EN2 9AP Chase Ward 43 Existing football club  A mix of professional sport, recreation  Countryside Green Belt designation. Possible  Located some distance from  Develop for proposed uses  Nonw known 6‐10 years Available  N N N N N N N N N Include n/a Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N Potentially  Located within Green Belt.  Achievable Sport + Recreation Potentially developable Located within Green Belt. Proposed uses CFS188 Call for sites CFS188 Covert Way Fields, Covert Way,   EN4 0LT Cockfosters 6.98 Nature Reserve Rewilding Built up area  railway tunnel  Acceptable proximity to local  Rewilding None known.  6‐10 years Available N N N N N N N N N Include n/a Y Y N N N N N N N Y N N Y N N Potentially  Rewilding  would have  Achievable Nature Recovery Potentially developable Rewilding could have environmental 

Availability Period Overall availability 

conclusion Level 1 Constraints Overall Achievability 

Conclusion Character of existing area

Potential physical constraints, environmental constraints, 

Access to local servicesOwner / developer 

intentions Known Legal Issues

Findings and Outcome

Ward 

Site Information  Availability  SuitabilitySite HELAA Reference

Site Source  Site Source Reference  Site name / address Postcode Level 2 constraintsSite area (ha) Current Land Use Proposed Use

42

Appendix F: Maps of assessed sites

HELAA outcome

Constraints

Green Belt

Borough boundary

Level 1 constraints*

Strategic Industrial Land

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

Level 2 constraints*

Excluded sites

HELAA - Sites excluded due to being 100% within Level 1 constraints

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

Constraints

HELAA outcome

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Level 1 constraints

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

All other Level 2 constraints combined

Deliverable sites

Potentially developable sites

Developable sites

Not developable within the next 15 years

HELAA – Housing sites – Overall Assessment Summary

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

Constraints

HELAA outcome

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Level 1 constraints*

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

All other Level 2 constraints combined*

Deliverable sites

HELAA – Housing sites – Deliverable Sites

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

Constraints

HELAA outcome

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Level 1 constraints*

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

All other Level 2 constraints combined*

Developable sites

HELAA – Housing sites – Developable Sites

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

Constraints

HELAA outcome

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Level 1 constraints*

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

Level 2 constraints*

Potentially developable

HELAA – Housing sites – Potentially Developable Sites

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

Constraints

HELAA outcome

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Level 1 constraints*

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

All other Level 2 constraints combined*

Not developable within the next 15 years

HELAA – Housing sites - Not developable within the next 15 years

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

HELAA outcome

Constraints

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

Level 1 constraints*

All other Level 2 constraints combined*

Not developable within the next 15 years

Potentially developable

Deliverable

Developable

HELAA – Employment sites – Overall assessment Summary

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

HELAA outcome

Constraints

Borough boundary

Green Belt

Level 1 constraints*

Strategic Industrial Locations

Locally Significant Industrial Sites

All other Level 2 constraints combined*

Potentially developable - Sport and recreation

Potentially developable - Nature recovery

Potentially developable - Natural burial

Potentially developable - Crematorium

Potentially developable - Cemetery

HELAA – Other proposed uses sites – Overall Assessment Outcome Summary

*The full list of Level 1 and Level 2 constraints is included within Appendix C

43

Appendix G: List of rejected sites

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

BOC4 Call for Sites

LP554 Site B (141-145 Green Lanes) 141 -145 Green Lanes, N13 4SP

Bowes Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

BOC6 Call for Sites LP644 115 Bowes Road, Enfield, N13 4SB Bowes Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

BOE1 Call for Sites LP662 Beale Close – a lot of land allocated for car parking. Bowes Ward Overlapping

CHC16 Call for Sites LP643 Lavinia House, 2 Strayfield Rd, Enfield, EN2 9JE Chase Ward Overlapping

CHC20 Call for Sites LP661 Lavinia Nursery, 32 Strayfield Rd, Enfield, EN2 9JE Chase Ward Overlapping

CHC22 Call for Sites LP1152 Land at Crews Hill, Theobalds Park Road, Enfield. EN2 9BQ Chase Ward Overlapping

CHC4 Call for Sites LP1132 Land on the west side of Great Cmbridge Road EN1 4DS Chase Ward Overlapping

EHC2 Call for Sites <Null> The Brightside Garages & Car Park, EN3 5DY Enfield Highway

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

EHC3 Call for Sites <Null> Oatlands Road Garages, EN3 5LJ Enfield Highway

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

EHC5 Call for Sites <Null> The Sunny Road Garages, EN3 5EF Enfield Highway

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

EHC6 Call for Sites <Null> Bowood Rd, EN3 7LL Enfield Highway

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

ELC1 Call for Sites LP1162 Ramney Marsh Mollison Avenue Enfield Lock Ward Overlapping

ELC5 Call for Sites <Null> Ashton Rd, EN3 6DD Enfield Lock Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

ELC6a Call for Sites <Null> Ramney Drive North, EN3 6FG Enfield Lock Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

HIC12 Call for Sites <Null> Chiltern Dene, EN2 7HH Highlands Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

44

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

HIC1b Call for Sites LP069 Chase Farm Hospital Highlands Ward Overlapping

HIC2 Call for Sites LP1102 Land North of Enfield Road between Trent Park Equestrian Centre and Frosty

Highlands Ward Overlapping

HIC3 Call for Sites LP1115 66 The Ridgeway EN2 Highlands Ward Overlapping

HIC4 Call for Sites LP1116 Land south of Enfield Road Highlands Ward Overlapping

PAC1 Call for Sites LP1122 Land to rear of 225-257 Green Lanes N13 4XE

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

POC7 Call for Sites <Null> Clarence Road Enfield, EN3 4BL Ponders End

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

SBC1 Call for Sites LP650 Enfield Town Railway Station/Southbury Rd, Enfield EN1 1YX

Southbury Ward Overlapping

SGC7 Call for Sites LP1171 Rear of 18-28 Wilmer Way, N14 7JA

Southgate Green Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

SOC9 Call for Sites LP1184 Rear of 2-14 Nursery Road, N14 5QB Southgate Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

TUC4 Call for Sites <Null> Bouvier Rd, EN2 7HH

Turkey Street Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

TUC9b Call for Sites <Null> Stoneleigh 2 - Stoneleigh Ave, EN1 4HJ

Turkey Street Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1119 30 Wilmer Way N14 7HX

Southgate Green Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1154 18 Hillfield Park N21 3QH Winchmore Hill Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1155 214 Willow Road EN1 3BT Town Ward Site Size less than 0.05Ha

45

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> Call for Sites LP1156 74 Grenoble Gardens N13 6JH Bowes Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1157 12 Carlton Avenue N14 4UA Cockfosters Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP556 116 Cockfosters Road, Enfield EN4 0DY Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

<Null> Call for Sites LP1135 69 Cranford Avenue

Southgate Green Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP699 241 Green Street EN37 SJ

Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

<Null> Call for Sites LP1106_1 Enfield Town Railway Station/Southbury Rd, Enfield EN1 1YX

Palmers Green Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1112 38 Houndsden Road N21 1LT Winchmore Hill Ward Overlapping

<Null> Call for Sites LP1113 76 Hedge Hill, Enfield, EN2 8RS (Garden) Highlands Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1125 53 Ecclesbourne Gardens N13 5JD

Palmers Green Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1126 36 Uplands Way N21 1DT Grange Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

<Null> Call for Sites LP1127 8 Wilmer Way N14 7BJ

Southgate Green Ward

Site Size less than 0.05Ha

UPC3 Call for Sites LP1147 Meridain Water Area

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPC4 Call for Sites LP597 Meridain Water Area

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

46

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SBE5 Call for Sites LP612 Remainder of GCRMTA Part A Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE4 Call for Sites LP612

Section of GCRMTA Part A which could be mixed-use (north of Southbury Road / east of the Colosseum and Enfield retail parks

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

BOE15a Call for Sites LP612 Garage spaces behind homes on Palmerston Road (North) Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

BOE15b Call for Sites LP612 Garage spaces behind homes on Palmerston Road (Centre) Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

BOE16 Call for Sites LP612 Garage spaces behind homes on Palmerston Road (South) OUTSIDE LBE

Availability Unknown

BOE18 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and car parking space behind houses at corner of Maidstone Road and Oak Lane

Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE35 Call for Sites LP612 Capitol House, 794 Green Lanes [conversion from offices – 65 dwellings. Appears on Brownfield Register]

Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

COE1 Call for Sites LP612 New Avenue, Avenue Road [ER] – 230 additional dwellings by 2025 – in progress

Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

EDE40 Call for Sites LP612 Site by roundabout opposite the south end of Swaythling Close

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE47 Call for Sites LP612 Empty plot at Maldon Road

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE6 Call for Sites LP612 Enfield Highway Working Men’s Club (? Under development) Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE23 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and hard standing / car parking at Ellen Ct

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

POE20 Call for Sites LP612 Lincoln House [Brownfield Reg – conversion from offices to 6 dwellings – permissioned]

Ponders End Ward Under 0.05ha

POE17a Enfield Road Watch/CPRE LP613

Redburn Trading Estate Ponders End Ward Overlapping

47

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

TUE17 Call for Sites LP612 Thames roofing and building supplies

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE18 Call for Sites LP612 Site at corner of Stonard Road and Green Lanes (already under development?)

Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE1 Enfield Road Watch/CPRE

Not applicable Beale Close – a lot of land allocated for car parking. Bowes Ward Overlapping

BOE2 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind N. Circular Road and Princes Ave homes. Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE3 Call for Sites LP612 Development potential along N. Circular frontage at corner of Green Lanes

Bowes Ward Overlapping

BOE4 Call for Sites LP612 Single storey on 105-117 Green Lanes at Melbourne Ave - potential for extra storey/s.

Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE5 Call for Sites LP612 Single storey on Green Lanes between Melbourne Ave and Kelvin Ave - potential for extra storey/s.

Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE6 Call for Sites LP612 Land adjacent to railway at end of Beech Road Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

BOE7 Call for Sites LP612 Pymmes Road – car parking / garage space Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE8 Call for Sites LP612 Parking area on Deans Drive Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

BOE9 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Pantiles Close Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE10 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking and garages space also at Pantiles Cl Bowes Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05ha

BOE11 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking on Colet Close Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE12 Call for Sites LP612 Garages / car parking at Wilde Place. Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE13 Call for Sites LP612 Space at the corner of Tottenhall Rd and St Paul’s Rise Bowes Ward Under 0.05ha

BOE14 Call for Sites LP612 Garages between Berkshire Gardens and Lyndhurst Road homes

Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

48

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

BOE17 Call for Sites LP612 Car park/ garage block at Wynaud Ct Bowes Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE1 Call for Sites LP612 39 First Avenue - yard Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE2 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Main Avenue and Agricola Place Southbury Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE3 Call for Sites LP612 Possible residential storey/s over Co-op Local on Leighton Road

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE4 Call for Sites LP612 Possible infill site between Alberta Road and Hazelwood Road behind Woodgrange Terrace

Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE5 Call for Sites LP612 Possible development above Green Lanes Surgery plus car park and petrol station.

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE6 Call for Sites LP612 Possible infill site behind Green Lanes shopping parade at Elm Park Road.

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE7 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind Bridge Parade on Green Lanes at Green Dragon Lane.

Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE8 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Aldbury Mews Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE9a Call for Sites LP612 Hydefield Close garages (West) Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE9b Call for Sites LP612 Hydefield Close garages (East) Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE10 Call for Sites LP612

Three of the four car parks on Ainsley Close could be consolidated to create space for a new building [SIZE GIVEN IS FOR ALL 4]

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE11 Call for Sites LP612 Small garage site behind buildings at Bury St West (near to Ramscroft Close)

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE12 Call for Sites LP612 Large pub car park at the Stag and Hounds, Bury St West Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE13 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Conifer Gardens Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE14 Call for Sites LP612 Church St / Bury St West junction – the parade could be built higher

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

49

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

BUE15 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at the top of Bagshot Road Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE16 Call for Sites LP612 Site for possible addition of residential storey near Bush Hill Park Station

Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE17 Call for Sites LP612 Site for possible addition of residential storey near Bush Hill Park Station

Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE18 Call for Sites LP612 Bush Hill Park Station car park Bush Hill Park Ward Overlapping

BUE19 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and car parking space behind residential blocks at Wendy Close

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE20 Call for Sites LP612 Car park site at Tweedy Close (also near Bush Hill Park station)

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE21 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Winchester Close Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE22 Call for Sites LP612 Garages sites at Queen Anne’s Gardens (A) Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE23 Call for Sites LP612 Garages sites at Queen Anne’s Gardens (B) Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE24 Call for Sites LP612 Garages sites at Queen Anne’s Gardens C Bush Hill Park Ward Overlapping

BUE25 Call for Sites LP612 Garages sites at Lingfield Close Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE26 Call for Sites LP612 Wellington Road (west end of) – garage/ car park site Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE27 Call for Sites LP612 Village Road garages Site A Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE28 Call for Sites LP612 Village Road garages Site B Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE29 Call for Sites LP612 Village Road Site C - car parking Bush Hill Park Ward Under 0.05ha

BUE30 Call for Sites LP612 Lincoln Road (near Village Road) garage /car park sites Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE31 Call for Sites LP612 Woodfield Close car parking spaces could be consolidated to create space to build

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

50

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

BUE33 Call for Sites LP612 Site behind houses at the south end of Bury Street West Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

BUE34 Call for Sites LP612 Low rise parade Bury St West/ church St 20 x 40 Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

CHE1 Call for Sites LP612 Kingswood Nurseries Bullsmoor Lane Chase Ward Overlapping

CHE2 Call for Sites LP612 Kynaston Road car park Chase Ward

Availability Unknown

CHE3 Call for Sites LP612 Lancaster Road – single story could have added story or redevelopment

Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

CHE4 Call for Sites LP612 Possible redevelopment site at corner of Lancaster and Acacia

Chase Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

CHE5 Call for Sites LP612 Possible redevelopment site on Lancaster at Lavender. Playschool could be incorporated

Chase Ward

Availability Unknown

CHE6 Call for Sites LP612 Possible infill at 330 Baker Street. Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

CHE7 Call for Sites LP612 Magpie Close - car parking space Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

CHE8 Call for Sites LP612 Hoe Lane / Magpie Close garages (2 sites either end of the estate)

Chase Ward

Availability Unknown

CHE9 Call for Sites LP612 134 Lancaster Road (Co-op funeral care) Chase Ward

Availability Unknown

CHE10 Call for Sites LP612 Sites with garages and hard-standing adjacent to the Enfield Vineyard Church

Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

CHE12 Call for Sites LP612 Wetherby Rd/ Pinnata Close – consolidate parking to create space for a new block

Chase Ward

Availability Unknown

COE2 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Sovereign Mews Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE3 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Cockfosters Station Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

COE4 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Belmont Close Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE5 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Balmore Crescent Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

51

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

COE6 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Bramley Road Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE7 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind houses at Oakwood Parade Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

COE8 Call for Sites LP612 Oakwood Station car park plus the low rise commercial buildings adjacent and the garages to the south east

Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

COE9 Call for Sites LP612 Esso and Tesco Express site Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE10 Call for Sites LP612 Garages Freshfield Drive (A) Cockfosters Ward Under 0.05ha

COE11 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Aysgarth Court Cockfosters Ward Under 0.05ha

COE12 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site at Avenue Road (just north of Speyside) Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE13 Call for Sites LP612 Tregenna Close car parking space / garages Cockfosters Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

COE14 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site near Oakwood Station at Gerrards Close Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE15 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Ashmead Road and the east end of the Vineries Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE16 Call for Sites LP612 Car park Wellston Crescent Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE17 Call for Sites LP612 Central plot of land at Merrivale and Sherringham Avenue Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE18 Call for Sites LP612 Shack with hardstanding at Sherringham Ave / Prince George’s Avenue / Merrivale

Cockfosters Ward

Availability Unknown

COE19 Call for Sites LP612 Blackhorse Tower, Holbrook House and Churchwood House site at 116 Cockfosters Road, EN4 0DY

Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

EDE1 Call for Sites LP612 Monmouth and St. Martin’s car park

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE2 Call for Sites LP612 Add mixed use over big boxes such as Asda

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

52

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDE3 Call for Sites LP612 Repurpose surface car parks adjacent to Asda

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE4 Call for Sites LP612 LSIS - Montagu Industrial Area South B – the remainder (i.e. the area not included in Meridian Water

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE5 Call for Sites LP612 SIL Montagu North from Gibbs Road

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE6 Call for Sites LP612 SIL Edmonton Eco Park - waste disposal facility

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE7 Call for Sites LP612 SIL - Eley Estate: Coca Cola factory / Parker Knoll factory + warehousing / other businesses

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE8 Call for Sites LP612 SIL Aztec 406

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE9 Call for Sites LP612 Pymmes Park Inn, 56 Victoria Road – redevelopment site

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE10 Call for Sites LP612 Vacant lot – Maldon Road at Victoria Road

Edmonton Green Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05ha

EDE12 Call for Sites LP612 Edmonton Green Car Services at 2C Balham Road and adjacent businesses – suitable site for redevelopment

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE14 Call for Sites LP612 Possible infill site next to 125 Montagu Road

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE15 Call for Sites LP612 Possible redevelopment site on Montagu Road.

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

53

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDE16 Call for Sites LP612 Garages Ellanby Crescent

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE17 Call for Sites LP612 The big Sinclair’s commercial laundry site on Brettenham Road

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE18 Call for Sites LP612 Dodsley Place car park

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE20 Call for Sites LP612 Space for parking at Sycamore Close

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE21 Call for Sites LP612 Liberty Close small site for infill

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE22 Call for Sites LP612 Angel Close garages

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE23 Call for Sites LP612 Small commercial site on Sterling Way by Angel Close

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE24a Call for Sites LP612 Site north of Park Rd

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE24b Call for Sites LP612 Site south of Park Rd

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE25 Call for Sites LP612 Plot behind Nill’s furniture building- (Park Road / Fore St)

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE26 Call for Sites LP612 Garage light industrial site at north end of Shrubbery Road

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

54

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDE27 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind shops at Warrior Drive

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE28 Call for Sites LP612 Shed at Balfour Mews

Edmonton Green Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

EDE29a Call for Sites LP612 Cross Keys Close

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE29b Call for Sites LP612 Balham Rd

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE30 Call for Sites LP612 Hardstanding at Newdales Close with low-rise building

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE31a Call for Sites LP612 Hardstanding space by blocks at Beaconsfield Road (north)

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE31b Call for Sites LP612 Hardstanding space by blocks at Beaconsfield Road (South)

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE31c Call for Sites LP612 Car parking to east of Beaconsfield Road

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE32 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking site and hardstanding area just south of Sebastapol Road

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE33 Call for Sites LP612 Car Park at Station House Mews

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE35 Call for Sites LP612 Space around and behind buildings at corner of Fore St and N Circular

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

55

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDE36 Call for Sites LP612 Low rise MOT centre building Fairfield Rise

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE37 Call for Sites LP612 Cavendish Close car park

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE38a Call for Sites LP612 Cameron Close car park (North)

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE38b Call for Sites LP612 Cameron Close car park (South)

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

EDE39 Call for Sites LP612 Mums Café car park and curtilage – also space behind and space given to road/pavement

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE42a Call for Sites LP612 Car parking space at Pyecroft Way (north)

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE42b Call for Sites LP612 Car parking space at Pyecroft Way (south)

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE43 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking space at Barbot Close

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE44 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Barbot Close at Galahad Road

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE45 Call for Sites LP612 Space between buildings at Galahad Road

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

EDE46 Call for Sites LP612 Garages / car parking and space around buildings at Church St/ Victoria Road / All Saints Close

Edmonton Green Ward

Availability Unknown

56

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDE48 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at West Close

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EDE49 Call for Sites LP612 and another similar nearby behind shops at Victoria Road

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

EHE1 Call for Sites LP612

Sites behind shops north of Tyberry Rd on Hertford Road (see red marker) and adjacent site Mr Plant Hire (blue rooves etc)

Enfield Highway Ward Under 0.05ha

EHE2 Call for Sites LP612 Mr Plant Hire

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE3 Call for Sites LP612 Also car parking / garages at Arches Drive near the above site

Enfield Highway Ward Under 0.05ha

EHE4 Call for Sites LP612 1-23 Hertford Road (T Brewer Timber Merchants site)

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE5 Call for Sites LP612 Bobby’s tyres and curtilage to the front and side: this site could be built wider and higher

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE6 Call for Sites LP612 Also FSC MOT centre and B&M Autocare on Cedar Ave

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE7 Call for Sites LP612 Also semi-derelict site on the north side of Cedar Ave

Enfield Highway Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

EHE8 Call for Sites LP612 252 Hertford Rd (Santander + Coop Funeralcare) could both be built higher and include front curtilage

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE9 Call for Sites LP612

Land behind the Enfield Hub building (currently car park). This building could also be redeveloped to create a larger site and incorporate the front curtilage

Enfield Highway Ward

Insufficient information provided

57

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EHE10 Call for Sites LP612 Derelict site adjacent (seen below with hoardings near to the bus

Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

EHE11 Call for Sites LP612 Site at 38 Hertford Road Enfield (former Abel Scaffolding) - below

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE12 Call for Sites LP612 Also small site to the top right of this image which is at the end of Collinwood Avenue

Enfield Highway Ward Under 0.05ha

EHE13 Call for Sites LP612 Corner of Carterhatch Road (below). Could be built up to match scale at either end

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE14 Call for Sites LP612 Also land behind Castles Estate Agents (currently a car park)

Enfield Highway Ward Under 0.05ha

EHE15 Call for Sites LP612 Coop Food (139 Hertford Road) plus derelict land, buildings and garages to the rear of the adjacent building

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE16 Call for Sites LP612 383 Hertford Road (Persico and builder merchant)

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE17 Call for Sites LP612 Apparently disused but characterful white building and land adjacent

Turkey Street Ward

Insufficient information provided

EHE18 Call for Sites LP612 409 Hertford Road

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE19 Call for Sites LP612 Kwik Fit / Europcar, Hertford Road - Could be built to 4/5 stories retaining commercial space below

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE20 Call for Sites LP612 Land at corner of Crest Road / Hertford Road

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

58

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EHE21 Call for Sites LP612 Sites at Ingersoll Road / Hertford Road, some of which have hoardings

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE22 Call for Sites LP612 Also Esso petrol station and Tesco Express at corner of Ingersoll Rd / Hertford Road

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE23 Call for Sites LP612 Sites behind Esso at Ingersoll Rd (car park and derelict land)

Enfield Highway Ward

Availability Unknown

EHE24 Call for Sites LP612

Brimsdown Industrial Estate – much of this falls in Enfield Highway Ward but the south end falls in Ponders End (in this analysis the whole site is allocated to this ward)

Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

ELE1 Call for Sites LP612 733 Hertford Road – Wheels Van & Truck Rental Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE2 Call for Sites LP612 Plot behind corner shops a Albany Road / Hertford Road (south side)

Enfield Highway Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE3 Call for Sites LP612 Low rise buildings behind Shops at corner of Albany Rd/Hertford Rd (north side)

Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE4 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind shops at the corner of St Stephens Road and Hertford Road

Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE7 Call for Sites LP612 Land to rear of shops at corner of Ordnance Rd and Uckfield Rd (west side) (approx. 20x20m)

Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE8 Call for Sites LP612 Space at rear of Cunningham Avenue housing blocks Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE9 Call for Sites LP612 Small car park at Ramney Dr near to Enfield Lock Station Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE11 Call for Sites LP612 Bradley Court car park, Bradley Road (car parking could be accommodated on neighbouring streets)

Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE12 Call for Sites LP612 Archibald Close – make better use of space allocated to car parking

Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE13 Call for Sites LP612 Apparently derelict site by Enfield Lock Station (15 x 20 m) Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

59

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

ELE14 Call for Sites LP612 Cantrell Lodge car parking Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE16a Call for Sites LP612 Parking behind Ferndale Road long thin sites (North) Enfield Lock Ward Overlapping

ELE17 Call for Sites LP612 Bridle Close garage site A Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE18 Call for Sites LP612 Bridle Close garage site B Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE19 Call for Sites LP612 Bridle Close garage site C Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE20 Call for Sites LP612 Bridle Close garage site D Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE21 Call for Sites LP612 Land with mainly ramshackle buildings which appear to have access from Tysoe Avenue

Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE22 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at corner of Ordnance Rd and Chesterfield Road (Church land?) 25 x 15

Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE23 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Shipley Mews 30 x 15m Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE24 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Sten Close Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE25 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at end of Ferns Close 25 x 15m Enfield Lock Ward Under 0.05ha

ELE26 Call for Sites LP612 Freezywater Industrial Park (Mollison Ave / Hertford Rd) could be intensified for commercial / industrial use

Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

ELE27 Call for Sites LP612 Innova Business Park site (Mollison Ave) could be intensified for commercial / industrial use

Enfield Lock Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE1 Call for Sites LP612 Garage site Maplin Close Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE2 Call for Sites LP612 Garages Houndsden Road near Eversley Park Road Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE3 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and parking at Merridene Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE4 Call for Sites LP612 Rosa Garages Landra Gardens Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

60

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

GRE5 Call for Sites LP612 Station car park Grange Park Station Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE6 Call for Sites LP612 Sheds on the Grangeway, adjacent to the bridge / railway station

Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE7 Call for Sites LP612 Car park on Homewillow Close (also v near the station) Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE8 Call for Sites LP612 Garages advertised to let at the south end of Nestor Avenue and north end of Deepdene

Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE9 Enfield Road Watch/CPRE

Not applicable Garages at Oxford Gardens (by the sports club pitches) Grange Ward

Overlapping

GRE10 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind blocks at Berkeley Gardens Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE11 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Adamsrill Close Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE12 Call for Sites LP612 Sheds and hardstanding at St Stephen’s Church Hall on Park Avenue

Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE13 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking and garages at Mortimer Drive: car parking could be consolidated to create space for new block/s

Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE14 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at the end of Walnut Grove Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE15 Call for Sites LP612 Forsyth Place garages Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE16a Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind blocks at Village Road Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE16b Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind blocks at Village Road Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE17 Call for Sites LP612 Garages / space behind blocks at London Road Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE18 Call for Sites LP612 Tiptree Drive garages Grange Ward Overlapping

GRE19 Call for Sites LP612 Genotin Road car park (the one to the west of Genotin Road) Grange Ward Overlapping

GRE22 Call for Sites LP612 Enfield Town Club car park on Old Park Avenue Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

61

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

GRE23 Call for Sites LP612 Plot at Old Park Ridings (? Under development) Grange Ward Overlapping

GRE24 Call for Sites LP612 Gladbeck way car park Grange Ward Overlapping

GRE25 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Tempsford Cl / Firbank Cl Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE26 Call for Sites LP612 and nearby garages at Gladbeck Way Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE27 Call for Sites LP612 Also further south, car parking space at Gladbeck Way x 2 Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE27 Call for Sites LP612 Also further south, car parking space at Gladbeck Way x 2 Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

GRE29 Call for Sites LP612 Badger’s Close car parking space Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

GRE30 Call for Sites LP612 Ross House site Grange Ward Overlapping

HAE1 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Laburnum Avenue Haselbury Ward Overlapping

HAE2a Call for Sites LP612 Garages Gatward Green x 2 Haselbury Ward Overlapping

HAE2b Call for Sites LP612 Garages Gatward Green x 2 Haselbury Ward Overlapping

HAE3 Call for Sites LP612 Parking-space to the rear of buildings on Church St just east of Hydefield Court

Haselbury Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

HAE4 Call for Sites LP612 Hard standing behind houses at Hydefield Court Haselbury Ward Under 0.05ha

HAE7 Call for Sites LP612 Consolidate parking to create space for new block/s at Streamside Close

Haselbury Ward

Availability Unknown

HAE8 Call for Sites LP612 Lopen Road site Haselbury Ward

Availability Unknown

HAE9 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Ruskin Walk Haselbury Ward

Availability Unknown

HAE10 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking at Milestone Close Haselbury Ward

Availability Unknown

62

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

HIE1 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site at Lonsdale Drive near Lindal Cres (partly used as electricity substation)

Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE2 Call for Sites LP612 Car park/s at Jolly Farmers (Enfield Road) Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE3 Call for Sites LP612 Former library space and parking at Enfield Rd / Foxmead Close

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE4 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking spaces at Millers Green Close (consolidate parking to create space for new blocks)

Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE5 Call for Sites LP612 Car park behind blocks at junction of Slades Hill and Ridgeway

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE6 Call for Sites LP612 Garages Canford Close Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE7 Call for Sites LP612 Garage block and parking space behind 2 blocks on Ridgeway (near to Robson Close)

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE8 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Englefield Close Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE9 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site off Chase Ridings (just north of Englefield Close)

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE10 Call for Sites LP612 Car park Havenhurst Rise Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE11 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at the Grove (near Valley Fields Crescent) Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE12b Call for Sites LP612 Crofton Way - Garages sites – there are 7 or 8 areas with garages or parking

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE13 Call for Sites LP612 Car park Woodridge Close (car parkin could be located on-street)

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE14 Call for Sites LP612 Ridgeway Tavern car park Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE15 Call for Sites LP612 Site behind garage on the Ridgeway Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE16a Call for Sites LP612 Roundhedge Way garages x 2 sites Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE16b Call for Sites LP612 Roundhedge Way garages x 2 sites Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

63

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

HIE17 Call for Sites LP612

Banbury Close, site adjacent to railway, behind blocks Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE18a Call for Sites LP612 Garages site Monks Close x 3 Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE18b Call for Sites LP612 Garages site Monks Close x 3 Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE18c Call for Sites LP612 Garages site Monks Close x 3 Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE20 Call for Sites LP612 Hermitage Close garages Highlands Ward Under 0.05ha

HIE21a Call for Sites LP612 2 x garages sites north and south of Bycullah Road (north end of)

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE22a Call for Sites LP612 Also one garage site and one car park site at Bycullah Road Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE22b Call for Sites LP612 Also one garage site and one car park site at Bycullah Road Highlands Ward Overlapping

HIE23 Call for Sites LP612 Garages Culloden Road Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE24 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind blocks at the Ridgeway (near North end of Glebe Avenue)

Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE25 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site at junction of Glebe Avenue and Windmill Hill Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

HIE26 Call for Sites LP612 Auto 2000 site Windmill Hill (near junction with Bycullah Road) [ETFM]

Highlands Ward Overlapping

HIE27 Call for Sites LP612 Car park behind blocks at Chase Court Gardens Highlands Ward

Availability Unknown

JUE1 Call for Sites LP612 Site near new development on Hickory Close (room for an extra block here)

Jubilee Ward Overlapping

JUE2 Call for Sites LP612 Garage / car park Mansfield Close Jubilee Ward Under 0.05ha

JUE3 Call for Sites LP612 Site on Hertford Road opposite Galliard Road Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

JUE4 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and plot behind block at Dartford Avenue Jubilee Ward Under 0.05ha

64

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

JUE7 Call for Sites LP612 Elisabeth Ride car park plot Jubilee Ward Under 0.05ha

JUE8 Call for Sites LP612 Granary Close, reconfigure parking to create space for new block

Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

JUE9 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking at Dawson Terrace Jubilee Ward Under 0.05ha

JUE10 Call for Sites LP612 Corner plot on Hertford Road / Tramway Avenue Jubilee Ward Under 0.05ha

JUE11 Call for Sites LP612 Cornish Court / Ripon Road – reconfigure parking to create space for new block

Jubilee Ward Under 0.05ha

JUE12 Call for Sites LP612 Houndsfield Road Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

JUE13 Call for Sites LP612 Also – adjacent plot which could be built higher and incorporate the car park

Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

JUE14 Call for Sites LP612 Abra wholesale site [Pickett's Lock Wholesale] Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE1 Call for Sites LP612 Ellen court N9 0LJ, Path being used for car space - attached is a garage unit

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE2 Call for Sites LP612 Behind Monmouth road N9 0JE, Residential area that has on street parking and garage space

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE3 Call for Sites LP612 Croyland Road N9 7AY, garages on main road

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE4 Call for Sites LP612 St Malo Avenue N9 0RY, Space that is being used for small garage space and parking

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE6 Call for Sites LP612 Town Road site - yard / commercial buildings

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE7 Call for Sites LP612 Claverings Industrial Estate. Pickett’s lock lane, Light Industrial estate

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

65

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

LOE8 Call for Sites LP612 Acton Close car park

Edmonton Green Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE9 Call for Sites LP612 Small garages site Osward Pl

Lower Edmonton Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05ha

LOE10 Call for Sites LP612 Chiswick Road / Kingston Rd corner site (yard/commercial buildings)

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE11 Call for Sites LP612 Jubilee Crescent garages

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE12 Call for Sites LP612 Behind houses at Beamish Road

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE13 Call for Sites LP612 Petrol station and site behind it, at corner of Bounces Road, Hertford Road

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE14 Call for Sites LP612 Bounces Lane (garages site)

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE15 Call for Sites LP612 Hertford Road (car park/garages behind houses opposite the crescent)

Lower Edmonton Ward Overlapping

LOE16 Call for Sites LP612 Yard / sheds behind block at Kingsmead Ave / Rosemary Ave

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE17 Call for Sites LP612 Sirwan Food Centre site (could be built higher and the site could incorporate some of the forecourt / curtilage)

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE18 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind buildings at Hertford Road, just south of the junction with Bury Street

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

66

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

LOE19 Call for Sites LP612 Plot and shed at Lowden Road

Lower Edmonton Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

LOE20 Call for Sites LP612 Derelict plot behind housing at Montagu Road (between Nash and Bounces)

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE21 Call for Sites LP612 Garages with access at Exeter Road (between Monmouth Rd / Cornwall’s Ave)

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE22 Call for Sites LP612 Repair Centre Gordon Road, Monmouth Rd

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE24 Call for Sites LP612 Montagu Road / Town Road site / light industrial / garages / hardstanding

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE25 Call for Sites LP612 Car Park behind housing at Marsden Road

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE26 Call for Sites LP612 Eastbournia Ave garages/ light industrial?

Lower Edmonton Ward Overlapping

LOE27 Call for Sites LP612 Wellington Ave car park

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE28 Call for Sites LP612 Wellington Ave car repair

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE29 Call for Sites LP612 Car park and building - possibly something to do with the allotments

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE30a Call for Sites LP612 Garages sites on Picketts Lock Lane

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

67

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

LOE30b Call for Sites LP612 Garages sites on Picketts Lock Lane

Lower Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

LOE31a Call for Sites LP612 2 x car park sites at Barrowfield Cl

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

LOE31b Call for Sites LP612 2 x car park sites at Barrowfield Cl

Lower Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE1 Call for Sites LP612 Barrowell Green N21 3AS (abandoned unit) Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE2 Call for Sites LP612 N13 5DD – inefficient use of road space

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE3 Call for Sites LP612

Morrisons at Bridge Drive: low rise retail with large surface car park. (0.8977h). Also car parks behind the high street shops are relatively large spaces (0.3157h). Also Travis Perkins site at Bridg*

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE5 Call for Sites LP612 Palmers Green – low rise shops could add storey (0.191h)

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE6 Call for Sites LP612 Devonshire Close garages

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

PAE7 Call for Sites LP612 Fox Pub – adjacent car park

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

PAE8 Call for Sites LP612 Pilgrim's Close - Space for extra block – consolidate parking space

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE9 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and car parking spaces (adjacent sites) on Green Lanes near Palmerston Cres

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

68

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

PAE10 Call for Sites LP612 Elmdale Rd / Green Lanes – used car lot

Palmers Green Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

PAE11 Call for Sites LP612 North Circular and Green Lanes commercial site

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

PAE12 Call for Sites LP612 Large ‘shed’ commercial building + the petrol station at New River and Green Lanes

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE13a Call for Sites LP612 Large car parks at Oakthorpe Road properties (west)

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE13b Call for Sites LP612 Large car parks at Oakthorpe Road properties (east)

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

PAE14 Call for Sites LP612 Small garage site at Ecclesbourne Close

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE15 Call for Sites LP612 Near corner of Ecclesbourne Gardens – garages behind houses on North Circular Road

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE16 Call for Sites LP612 North London van centre on Green Lanes

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE17 Call for Sites LP612 Car park Hazelwood Lane

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE18 Call for Sites LP612 Yasir Halim Hedge Lane near Green Lanes

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

PAE19 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind blocks at corner of Hedge Lane and Green Lanes

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

69

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

PAE20 Call for Sites LP612 Garage corner site at South end of Barrow Close

Palmers Green Ward Under 0.05ha

PAE21 Call for Sites LP612 Mintern Close garages

Palmers Green Ward

Availability Unknown

POE1 Call for Sites LP612 Behind 52 Northfield Road (15x 15m) and garages behind adjacent buildings

Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE2 Call for Sites LP612 High Street parade opposite the end of Stonehorse Road Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POE3 Call for Sites LP612 Car park land to rear of the Goat pub, Hertford Rd and the adjacent building

Ponders End Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

POE4a Call for Sites LP612 Asda Ponders End related car parking / curtilage Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE5 Call for Sites LP612 The Boundary pub and various small sites surrounding it which are semi-derelict or used as car park.

Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE6 Call for Sites LP612 Petrol station adjacent to Boundary Pub could be incorporated

Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE7 Call for Sites LP612 Small plot at corner of Southfield Rd and High St Ponders End Ward Under 0.05ha

POE8 Call for Sites LP612 Site on Hertford Road between Boundary Ditch and Nightingale Road

Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

POE9 Call for Sites LP612 Zara pharmacy and adjacent building (High St) could be built to scale of neighbouring buildings. Very small

Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE10 Call for Sites LP612 Site adjacent to White Hart Ponders End Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

POE11 Call for Sites LP612 Site at the corner of Stonehorse Road and High St – low rise, could be built higher

Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE12 Call for Sites LP612 Large site – Tesco + car park at Southbury Road Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE13a Call for Sites LP612 Large sites - Light industrial sites to north of Queensway [1.9ha and 1.25ha] Queensway Industrial Estate

Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POE13b Call for Sites LP612 Large sites - Light industrial sites to south of Queensway [1.9ha and 1.25ha] Queensway Industrial Estate

Ponders End Ward Overlapping

70

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

POE14 Call for Sites LP612 Glyn Road car park – surface car park Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POE15 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Gardiner Close Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE16 Call for Sites LP612 Alma Road industrial site Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE17b Call for Sites LP612

Meridian Business park [14.2ha]. Commercial sites to the south east and south west of Ponders End Station – possible sites for mixed use redevelopment

Ponders End Ward

Availability Unknown

POE18 Call for Sites LP612 Woodall Rd car park v close to station Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POE21 Call for Sites LP612 Site at the junction of Mayfield Crescent– a small car park Ponders End Ward Under 0.05ha

SBE1 Call for Sites LP612 Enfield Retail Park / Colosseum Retail Park 14.84ha. The Colosseum part is 4.5ha (undesignated)

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE2 Call for Sites LP612 South of Southbury Road inc Morrisons (undesignated) Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE3 Call for Sites LP612 Asda section of Great Cambridge Road and Martinbridge Trading Estate Part A

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE7 Call for Sites LP612

Leisure Centre car park, TGI / Pizzahut etc plus surface plus surface car parks and the school site. This whole site could be better / more effectively used / higher rise (school could be moved to so*

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE8 Call for Sites LP612 Tesco Superstore plus car park and Royal Mail at Enfield Town

Southbury Ward Overlapping

SBE9 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking spaces at Waddington Close Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE10 Call for Sites LP612 Garages between housing on Seaford Road and Queen’s Road

Southbury Ward Under 0.05ha

SBE11a Call for Sites LP612 Stanley Rd car park Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE11b Call for Sites LP612 Stanley Rd garage Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

71

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SBE12 Call for Sites LP612 Car park behind block on Southbury Rd close to Fotheringham Road

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE13 Call for Sites LP612 Cecil Avenue yard site Southbury Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

SBE14 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Cross Road opposite the end of Falmer Road Southbury Ward Under 0.05ha

SBE15 Call for Sites LP612 Site at corner or Burleigh Road Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE18 Call for Sites LP612 Long thin site with garages between Clive Road and Southbury Avenue

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE19 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Hadrian’s Ride Southbury Ward Overlapping

SBE20 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and car park at Ermine Side Southbury Ward Overlapping

SBE21 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Ermine Side Southbury Ward Overlapping

SBE22 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Cobham Close Southbury Ward Under 0.05ha

SBE23 Call for Sites LP612 Garage space in the centre of housing at Kimberley Gardens, Sketty Road, Southbury Road, Ladysmith Road

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

SBE27 Call for Sites LP612 Protyre site plus car parking space on A10 near to Oldbury Road

Southbury Ward Under 0.05ha

SBE28 Call for Sites LP612 Co-op, Leighton Road at Ladbroke Road Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

SGE1 Call for Sites LP612 Big box retail site adjacent to Ladderswood redevelopment

Southgate Green Ward

Availability Unknown

SGE2 Call for Sites LP612 Land adjacent to the railway at Station Road

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SGE3 Call for Sites LP612 Land adjacent to the sidings at Highview Gardens

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

72

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SGE4 Call for Sites LP612 Arnos Grove station surface parking

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SGE5 Call for Sites LP612 176+ Bowes Rd. Possible mixed use redevelopment 2 adjacent sites with large car parks, retaining church use

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SGE6 Call for Sites LP612 Marconi Car parking space around the central commercial building and some garages surrounding

Southgate Green Ward Under 0.05ha

SGE7 Call for Sites LP612 Waterfall Road roundabout: road layout / roundabout and road space to the north (return to green space?)

Southgate Green Ward

Availability Unknown

SGE8 Call for Sites LP612 Large car park at the Mall / bowling green

Southgate Green Ward

Availability Unknown

SGE10 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking space on High Road Estate

Southgate Green Ward Under 0.05ha

SGE11 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind the block at Woodland Rd/High Rd

Southgate Green Ward Under 0.05ha

SGE12 Call for Sites LP612 36-38 Friern Barnet Road, N11 1NA [Brownfield Reg – 6 new dwellings]

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SGE13 Call for Sites LP612 Small car park on Pymmes Close

Southgate Green Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE1 Call for Sites LP612 Library site could be built higher Southgate Ward Overlapping

SOE2 Call for Sites LP612 Royal Mail site could be built higher Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE3 Call for Sites LP612 Michenden car park (Leigh Hunt Drive) Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

73

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SOE4 Call for Sites LP612 Hard standing at site adjacent to the fire station, High Street Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE5 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind shops at Burleigh Gardens and Ashfield Parade (including long row of garages)

Southgate Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE6 Call for Sites LP612 Alan Pulinger centre site could be redeveloped, including community hall

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE7 Call for Sites LP612 Leigh Hunt Drive multi storey car park Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE8 Call for Sites LP612 McDonalds – infill?, esp when police station next door is redeveloped, and possibly with the adjacent building.

Southgate Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE10 Call for Sites LP612 Consolidate garages and parking at Ramsey Way, Windsor Court and Chase Side

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE11 Call for Sites LP612 Royal British Legion and large garage site on Windsor Court Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE12 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Chase Side near to Royal British Legion site and Grant Close

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE13 Call for Sites LP612 Garage site Windsor Court (opposite Royal British Legion site)

Southgate Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE14 Call for Sites LP612 Peck Haulage site – 133 Chase Road. Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE15 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Grovebury Close – suitable for infill? Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE16 Call for Sites LP612

Sainsbury’s at Florey Square (World’s End Lane) . Retain busy retail space but add storeys sympathetically to surroundings

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE17 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Blagden’s Lane Southgate Ward Overlapping

SOE18 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind buildings at Burleigh Gardens Southgate Ward Overlapping

SOE19 Call for Sites LP612 Low rise buildings on Crown Lane could be redeveloped to make better use of space

Southgate Ward Overlapping

SOE20 Call for Sites LP612 M&S Simply food (one storey) and car park could be redeveloped to 4 or 5 storeys

Southgate Ward Overlapping

74

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SOE21 Call for Sites LP612 Chase Road / Park Road car park Southgate Ward Overlapping

SOE22 Call for Sites LP612 Dudrich Holdings building redevelopment Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE23 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at St Thomas Rd / Aldridge Walk (there is space for parking on-street)

Southgate Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE24 Call for Sites LP612 Reconfigure parking / garages at Meadowbank / Eversley Park Rd to create space for new block

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE25 Call for Sites LP612 Large garages site at Springbank. Better use could be made of this space

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE26 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and parking at Maplin Close Grange Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE27 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind houses at Oakwood Cres Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE28 Call for Sites LP612 Small car parking site / garage site on Chaseville Park road Southgate Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE29 Call for Sites LP612 2 x large rows of garages and parking space behind houses at Chaseville Park Rd

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE31 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site at Highfield Court (move parking on-street) Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE32 Call for Sites LP612 Garages site Oakwood Close (accommodate parking on-street)

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE33 Call for Sites LP612 Garage blocks at Orchid Road Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE34 Call for Sites LP612 More garage blocks at Orchid Road Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE35 Call for Sites LP612 Small garages site behind housing at Old Farm Ave (plenty of parking space nearby)

Southgate Ward Under 0.05ha

SOE36 Call for Sites LP612 70-72 Chase Side [Brownfield Reg – over and behind shops – 8? additional dwellings]

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

SOE37 Call for Sites LP612 Solar House, 282 Chase Road [on Brownfield Reg for conversion from offices to 74 new dwellings]

Southgate Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE1 Call for Sites LP612 Car parks either side Chapel Street Town Ward Overlapping

75

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

TOE2 Call for Sites LP612 Hardstanding Chapel St (walled area) Town Ward Overlapping and Under 0.05ha

TOE3 Call for Sites LP612 A11O Fresh Trader - extra storey here Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE4 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind housing at Trinity St Town Ward Availability Unknown

TOE5 Call for Sites LP612 Hard standing behind Royal British Legion building, access at Trinity St Town Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE6 Call for Sites LP612 Gordon Hill Station car park cl Town Ward Availability Unknown

TOE7 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind houses at Youngman’s Close Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE8 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Lavender Hill Cul de Sac Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE9 Call for Sites LP612 Site at bus stop at Chase Side (currently a ground floor building with large forecourt)

Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE10 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Batley Road, Laurel Bank Rd, Chase Side – move parking onto Chase Side or on-street elsewhere

Chase Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE11 Call for Sites LP612 The Wonder – large pub car park Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE12 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and car parking space at the end of Youngman’s Close and behind housing at Chase Side Town Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE13 Call for Sites LP612 Buildings behind petrol station (and possibly also the petrol station) on Chase Side opposite the end of Halifax Road Town Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE14 Call for Sites LP612 Lee Valley Motor Co site at corner of Halifax Road and Chase Side Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE15 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Bell St Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE16 Call for Sites LP612 Space behind the Old Bell pub Town Ward Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

TOE17 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Ivinghoe Close Town Ward Overlapping

TOE18 Call for Sites LP612 Garages / parking behind Jolly Butcher Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE21 Call for Sites LP612 Second hand car plot at Parsonage Lane Town Ward Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

TOE22 Call for Sites LP612 Chase Side - ?Builders Yard at corner of Chase Side and Chase Side Avenue Town Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE23 Call for Sites LP612 Car Park behind the Moon Under Water Town Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE24 Call for Sites LP612 Also a car park behind housing on Chase Side Town Ward Under 0.05ha

76

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

TOE25 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Christchurch Close Town Ward Availability Unknown

TOE26 Call for Sites LP612 Attractive old Enfield Electricity Building plus hardstanding surrounding Town Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE27 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind houses at St George’s Rd Town Ward Availability Unknown

TOE28 Call for Sites LP612 Yard behind houses at junction of Carterhatch Rd and Russell Lane Town Ward

Availability Unknown

TOE30 Call for Sites LP612 RSPCA Primrose Avenue, could be built higher Chase Ward Under 0.05ha

TOE31 Call for Sites LP612 Large car parking space surrounding building at Gordon Rd Town Ward Availability Unknown

TOE32 Call for Sites LP612 Space to the rear of police station on Baker St Town Ward Availability Unknown

TOE33 Call for Sites LP612 Little Park Gardens Bus Station [ETFM] Town Ward Availability Unknown

TUE1a Call for Sites LP612 Bullsmore Lane - Two petrol stations opposite one another (north)

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE1b Call for Sites LP612 Bullsmore Lane - Two petrol stations opposite one another (south)

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE2 Call for Sites LP612 Bullsmore Lane - Burger King site, mainly road/car parking space

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE3 Call for Sites LP612 Bullsmore Lane McDonalds building – car parking space surrounding

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE4 Call for Sites LP612 Bullsmore Lane - Lackmore Road car park

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE5 Call for Sites LP612 Bullsmore Lane - junction with A10, reclaim road space

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

77

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

TUE7 Call for Sites LP612 Garages in Albridge Close

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE8 Call for Sites LP612 Holmwood Motors (809 Hertford Road)

Turkey Street Ward Overlapping

TUE9 Call for Sites LP612 Builders yard – Hertford Road (near Holmwood Road)

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE10 Call for Sites LP612

Larmans Rd/Cobbet Cl/Aylands Rd: there are 8 car parks + further smaller spaces. At least a couple could make way for a small terraced row.

Turkey Street Ward Under 0.05ha

TUE11 Call for Sites LP612 Long derelict road between Elsinge Road houses and railway line

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE12b Call for Sites LP612

Consolidate car parks on Dendridge Cl/Auckland Cl to create space for one or two blocks [SITE SIZE GIVEN FOR ALL 3 CAR PARKS 0.07+0.11+0.13] (centre)

Turkey Street Ward Overlapping

TUE12c Call for Sites LP612

Consolidate car parks on Dendridge Cl/Auckland Cl to create space for one or two blocks [SITE SIZE GIVEN FOR ALL 3 CAR PARKS 0.07+0.11+0.13] (west)

Turkey Street Ward Overlapping

TUE14 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking at Grove Rd West (behind high street shops)

Turkey Street Ward

Availability Unknown

TUE15 Call for Sites LP612

Low rise highstreet shops could be redeveloped with residential on top (on High Street between Longfield Ave and Grove Rd West)

Turkey Street Ward Under 0.05ha

TUE16 Call for Sites LP612 Lidl and large surface car park at Unity Road

Turkey Street Ward Overlapping

UPE1 Call for Sites LP612 Meridian Water site

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

78

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

UPE2 Call for Sites LP612 Yard at Leopold Road plus adjacent car park

Upper Edmonton Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

UPE3 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking space behind housing at Claremont St and Clive Ave

Upper Edmonton Ward

Overlapping and Under 0.05 ha

UPE6 Call for Sites LP612 Lidl supermarket plus extensive surface car park

Upper Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

UPE7 Call for Sites LP612 College Gardens car park

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPE8 Call for Sites LP612 Car parking sites on Raynham Rd / Cross St

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPE9 Call for Sites LP612 College Close / Sterling Way (Silver St cars)

Upper Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

UPE10 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Gilpin Crescent

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPE11 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Langhedge Close

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPE12 Call for Sites LP612 Commercial Road and North Middlesex industrial estates

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPE13 Call for Sites LP612 Langhedge Lane Industrial Estate

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

UPE14 Call for Sites LP612 Road and parking layouts at Wigston Close could be rethought to create space for new block/s

Upper Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

79

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

UPE15 Call for Sites LP612 Space at Whitehead Close for new block/s if parking reconfigured slightly

Upper Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

UPE16 Call for Sites LP612 Amersham Avenue / Barclay Road – space given to road / roundabouts

Upper Edmonton Ward Under 0.05ha

UPE17 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at rear of housing on Empire Avenue (next to the allotments)

Upper Edmonton Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE1 Call for Sites LP612 Garages 4 Pellipar Close (proximity to adjacent block would mean not all of this space could be used)

Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE2 Call for Sites LP612 Palmer’s Green Station Car Park and car parking space within adjacent development

Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE3 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Derwent Road

Southgate Green Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE4 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Lakeside Road

Southgate Green Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE5 Call for Sites LP612 Garages / car parking at St George’s Rd Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE6 Call for Sites LP612 Car parks at Crothall Close Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE7 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at corner of Bourne Hill and Green Lanes Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE8 Call for Sites LP612 Large Sainsburys site at Green Lanes (opposite Highfield Rd)

Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE9 Call for Sites LP612 Esso Garage Green Lanes / Highfield Road Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE10 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind block at top of Lynwood Grove Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE11 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at Hoppers Road / Lynwood Grove Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

80

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

WIE12 Call for Sites LP612 Garages at Henrietta Gardens (with in-fill development behind)

Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE13 Call for Sites LP612 Parking space / garages adjacent to block at top of Hoppers Road (next to railway line)

Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE14 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind block on Compton Road (railway line end) – parking could be located on street

Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE15 Call for Sites LP612 Farm Road / Ford’s Grove car park (7 minute walk to Winchmore Hill Station)

Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE16 Call for Sites LP612 Car park at top of Queen’s Ave Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE19 Call for Sites LP612

Road layout at Ford’s Grove / Firs Lane / Halstead Road takes up unnecessary amount of space (perhaps not for development but could be reconfigured to create more green space)

Bush Hill Park Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE20 Call for Sites LP612 Garages behind housing at Ford’s Grove / Firs Lane junction Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE21 Call for Sites LP612

Old police station plus hardstanding surrounding it (possibly already being developed?) at Green Lanes near to Compton Road

Winchmore Hill Ward Overlapping

WIE22 Call for Sites LP612 Travis Perkins builders yard site at Green Lanes (near Compton Road junction)

Winchmore Hill Ward Overlapping

WIE24 Call for Sites LP612 Garages and parking (2 sites) at Drayton Gardens and Vicar’s Moor Lane

Grange Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE25 Call for Sites LP612 Church Hill small car park site Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

WIE26 Call for Sites LP612 Large garages site at Stone Hall Road Winchmore Hill Ward

Availability Unknown

WIE27 Call for Sites LP612 Garage site at Hill House Close Winchmore Hill Ward Under 0.05ha

SBE6 Call for Sites LP612 GCRMTA Part B Jubilee Ward

Availability Unknown

POE19 Call for Sites LP612 Ponders End youth centre site plus curtilage and car park Ponders End Ward Overlapping

TOE19 Call for Sites LP612 Parsonage Lane Site already being built out? Town Ward Overlapping

81

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> Call for sites CFS210 Southgate Library, High Street, Southgate Southgate Overlapping

SOE9 Enfield Road Watch LP662 Asda site – 130 Chase Side Southgate Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS202

Land and Buildings at Saracens Club House, Bramley Sports Ground, Greens Lane

Cockfosters Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS192

2 and 2a Windmill Hill *former Magistrates Court house, Enfield EN2 6SA

Highlands Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS183 Former Enfield Arms, Genotin Road, Enfield, Town Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS185

Glyn Road Car Park Ponders End Overlapping

POE4b Enfield Road Watch/CPRE

LP662 John Wilkes House and related car parking / curtilage Ponders End Overlapping

PAE4a Enfield Road Watch/CPRE

Not applicable Car park off Lodge Drive which run down the west side of the car park

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

PAE4b Enfield Road Watch/CPRE

Not applicable Garages off Lodge Drive which run down the west side of the car park

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

PAC6 Call for Sites LP1174 255-275 Green Lanes Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS164

198-202 Fore Street, Edmonton Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS203

Car Park and Angel Community Centre, Raynham Road, N18 2SJ

Upper Edmonton Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS154

Rammey Marsh, Mollison Avenue, Enfield Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

CHC28 Call for Sites LP1152 Parkview Nursery Crews Hill Chase Overlapping

GRE28b Enfield Road Watch/CPRE

Not applicable Garages at Waverley Road Grange Ward Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites LP605 Land at Harbet Road ("Harbets Hump")

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

82

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null>

Call for Sites

Call for Sites REF LP597, LP1147, Clipped to exclude Planning Permission (SHLAA Ref UPP24 and UPP32)

Meridian Water Area (excluding planning application areas) - East bank

Upper Edmonton Ward

Overlapping

<Null> Call for Sites LP606 Ramney Marsh Mollison Avenue

Enfield Lock Overlapping

<Null> Call for Sites CFS156 North Middlesex University Hospital - Surface Car Park Lower Edmonton Overlapping

<Null> Call for sites CFS182

Charles Babbage House, 1 Orton Grove Chase Ward

Insufficient information provided

<Null> Edmonton Leeside AAP

Meridian Water Meridan Water

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

SGD9 North Circular AAP 2014 No 13 Bowes Road sites

Southgate Green Ward

Already developed

SGD4 North Circular AAP 2014 No 5 New Southgate Station

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 12_1 Ritz Parade sites a

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 2 Western Gateway Legal & General and National Grid sites

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

83

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SGD2

New Southgate Master Plan & North Circular AAP Site 3 Homebase Site

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 4 Topps Tiles site

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 12_2 Ritz Parades sites b

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 16 Green Lanes Junction NW

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

BOD1 North Circular AAP 2014 No 20 Birchwood Court

Bowes Ward

Already developed

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 18 Green Lanes Junction SW

Bowes Ward Overlapping

PAD1 North Circular AAP 2014 No 14 Southgate Town Hall

Palmers Green Ward

Already developed

PAD3 North Circular AAP 2014 No 17 Green Lanes Junction NE

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> North Circular AAP 2014 No 19 Green Lanes Junction SE

Bowes Ward Overlapping

SGD1

New Southgate Master Plan & North Circular AAP Site 1 Ladderswood Estate

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SGD6

New Southgate Master Plan & North Circular AAP No 9 Telford Road Sites

Southgate Green Ward

Already developed

SGD7

New Southgate Master Plan & North Circular AAP No 10 Telford Road/Bowes Road corner

Southgate Green Ward

Already developed

84

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SGD8

New Southgate Master Plan & North Circular AAP No 11 Bowes Road/Wilmer Way Sites

Southgate Green Ward

Already developed

SGD10 New Southgate Master Plan Site 7 Bowes Road Library and Clinic and Arnos Pool

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

TOD1 Enfield Town Master Plan Site 13 Market Square Town Ward

Not proposed for housing

<Null> Enfield Town Master Plan Site15 Chapel Street / Little Park Gardens Town Ward Overlapping

<Null>

New Southgate Master Plan & North Circular AAP Site 8 Coppice Lodge Care Home Site

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

GRD5 Enfield Town Master Plan Site 5_2 52 London Road

Grange Ward Overlapping

SGD3 New Southgate Master Plan Site 5_1 Friern Barnet Road Shops

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

POD1 Ponders End Central Area Planning Brief Site 13_2 Swan Annex

Ponders End Ward Overlapping

TOD2 Enfield Town Master Plan Site 14 Civic Centre Town Ward Overlapping

<Null> Enfield Town Master Plan Site 22 Auto 2000

Highlands Ward Overlapping

SBD1 Enfield Town Master Plan Site 2 Genotin Road Car Park

Southbury Ward

Availability Unknown

<Null> Enfield Town Master Plan Site 18 Old Park Avenue

Grange Ward Overlapping

TOD3 Allocations/Opportunity Sites

Enfield Town Master Plan (Site 16)

Portculis Lodge Town Overlapping

EHS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100001 115 Brancroft Way

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

85

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

LOS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100004 Forest Primary Care Centre

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

SGS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100005 23 Telford Road

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

COS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100006 2 & 4 Camlet Way Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

SBS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100007 280-286 Southbury Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

EHS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100008 33 Jeffreys Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

COS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100010 399 Cockfosters Road, En4 0Js Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

COS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100011 411 Cockfosters Road, En4 0Js Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

SBS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100012 42 Crown Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

COS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100013 50-54 Camlet Way Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

WIS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100014 517 Green Lanes Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

JUS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100016 5 Picketts Lock Lane, N9 0As Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

COS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100017 65 & 67 Kingwell Road, En4 0Hz Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

COS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100018 6 Crescent East, Land Adj Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100019 79 Windmill Hill Highlands Ward Overlapping

WIS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100020 7 Broad Walk, N21 3Da Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

86

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

COS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100021 8 Beech Hill Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

COS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100022 98-104 Camlet Way Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

EHS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100024 Brancroft Way - Peter Colby Commercials Limited

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100025 Bilton Way - Ovania Limited

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

PAS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100026 A1 Motors

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

COS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100027 Addison Avenue Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

POS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100028 Aden Road (West) Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100029 Aden Road (East) Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EDS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100030 Advent Way (East)

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100031 Advent Way (West)

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EHS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100032 Albany Pool

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100033 Albany Road

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

UPS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100034 Allotment Gardens, Edmonton

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

87

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

UPS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100035 Allotment Gardens, Edmonton

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

TUS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100036 Allotment Gardens, Freezy Water

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

TUS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100037 Allotment Gardens, Freezy Water

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

PAS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100038 Allotment Gardens, Palmers Green

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

SOS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100039 Allotment Gardens, Southgate Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SOS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100040 Allotment Gardens, Southgate Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100041 Allotment Gardens, Southgate

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

SOS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100042 Allotment Gardens, Southgate Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100043 Allotment Gardens, Winchmore Hill

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

POS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100044 Alma Estate - 1A (Kestrel House), 15-45A Alma Road Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100045 Alma Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100046 Alma Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100047 Alpha Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

88

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100048 Anthony Way

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

EHS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100049 Ardmore Construction Ltd

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

LOS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100050 Ardra Road - Refuse Disposal Depot

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

LOS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100051 Ardra Road

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100052 Argon Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

HIS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100053 Arnold House, 66 The Ridgeway, En2 8Ja Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100054 Arnos Grove Depot

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SBS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100056 Autumn Close Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SOS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100057 Avenue Road, N14 4En Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

TOS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100058 Enfield Grammar School Lower And Enfield County S* Town Ward Site Unavailable

EDS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100059 Banksia Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

WIS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100060 Barrowell Green Recycling Centre Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

SOS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100061 Bayliss Close Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

89

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100062 Becket Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

COS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100063 Beech Hill Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

EHS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100064 Ark John Keats Academy

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100065 Bilton Way

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

HIS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100066 Merryhills Primary School Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

SOS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100067 Blagdens Lane Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

JUS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100068 B M Polyco Ltd Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

UPS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100069 Bt Offices - Bolton Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

BOS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100070 Bowes Primary School Bowes Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100071 B & Q - Great Cambridge Road Southbury Ward Overlapping

UPS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100072 30 Commercial Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

UPS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100073 20 Commercial Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

EHS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100074 Braithwaite Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

90

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

COS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100075 Former Middlesex University Trent Park Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

EDS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100076 Brettenham Primary School

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100077 Timber Yard, Bridge Drive, N13 4Eu

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

UPS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100078 Bridport Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

CHS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100079 Brigadier Hill Chase Ward Site Unavailable

EHS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100080 Brimsdown

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

JUS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100081 British Telecom Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

EDS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100082 Brookside Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

SGS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100083 Broomfield Road

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

UPS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100084 Bull Lane

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

UPS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100085 Bull Lane Sports Ground

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

CHS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100086 Capel Manor Primary School Chase Ward Site Unavailable

91

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100087 Lea Valley High School

Turkey Street Ward

Insufficient Information Available

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100088 Bush Hill Park Station Bush Hill Park Ward Overlapping

SGS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100089 St Monica'S R C Primary

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

SBS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100090 Carlton International Plc Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100091 Car Park Adj Car Auction Centre, Enfield Southbury Ward

Insufficient Information Available

COS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100092 Catherine Court Chase Road, N14 4Rb Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100093 Catherine Ct. N14 (Off Conisbee Ct.) Cockfosters Ward

Insufficient Information Available

CHS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100094 Cattlegate Road Chase Ward Site Unavailable

GRS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100095 Cecil Road - Dugdale Centre Grange Ward Site Unavailable

EHS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100096 2-8 Centenary Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100097 1 Centenary Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

HIS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100098 Bmi The Kings Oak Hospital Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

HIS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100099 1-24 Ender'S Close, Chase Farm Hospitals Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

HIS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100100 Chase Farm (North Block) Hospitals Nhs Trust Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

92

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

HIS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100101 Chase Farm Hospital The Ridgeway Highlands Ward Overlapping

SOS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100103 Wolfson Hillel Primary School Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SOS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100104 West Grove Primary School Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

COS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100105 Oaktree School Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

SOS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100106 Eversley Primary School Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

ELS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100107 Chesterfield Primary School Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

TOS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100108 Churchbury Lane Town Ward Site Unavailable

TOS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100109 Chace Community School Town Ward Site Unavailable

TOS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100110 Church Lane Town Ward Site Unavailable

EHS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100112 Coca Cola & Schweppes Beverages Ltd

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100113 Cockfosters Depot Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100114 Holbrook House, Cockfosters Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

COS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100115 Cockfosters Road Shops Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100117 Cockfosters Station Car Park Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

POS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100118 Columbia Wharf, Ponders End Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100119 Joyce Avenue Housing Estate

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100120 Conduit Lane

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

93

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100121 Conduit Lane

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

CHS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100122 Cooks Hole Road Chase Ward Site Unavailable

CHS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100123 Council Depot, 7 Melling Drive Chase Ward Site Unavailable

COS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100124 Hadley Wood Primary School Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

SBS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100125 Crown Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

JUS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100127 Cuckoo Hall Academy Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

SBS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100128 Chalkmill Drive, Currys Ltd Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

EDS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100129 Daniel Close

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

SBS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100130 David Lloyd Leisure Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100131 Dearsley Road Car Park Southbury Ward Overlapping

SBS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100132 Dearsley Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

LOS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100133 1 Ardra Road

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

LOS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100134 Deephams Sewage Works

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100135 Derby Road

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

94

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

UPS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100136 Dysons Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

EHS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100137 Eastfield Primary School

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EDS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100138 Eco Park

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100139 Edmonton Green North Mall

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

LOS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100140 Eldon Junior School

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

PAS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100141 Electricity Sub Station And Vacant Land To South

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100142 Eley Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

CHS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100143 Elmtree Kennels, 8 Cooks Hole Road, En2 0Ud Chase Ward Site Unavailable

POS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100144 Emilia Close Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

SBS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100146 Southbury Road Car Park Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100147 270 Great Cambridge Road Car Park Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

TUS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100148 Landridge Drive, En1 4Lw

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

CHS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100149 Land At St. Ignatus College, En1 4Np Chase Ward Site Unavailable

95

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100150 Land North Of Slades Hill - En2 7Du Highlands Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100151 Land In Gordon Hill, En2 8Hs Highlands Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100153 Open Space East Of Jesus Church - En2 9Ey Chase Ward Overlapping

POS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100154 Land West Of Ponders End Station - En3 4Bx Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100155 Enfield Council Car Park - En3 4De Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100156 Orchard Road, En3 4En Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100157 Tesco Extra - En3 4Hf Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100158 45 Crown Road (Depot) - En3 4Hw Southbury Ward Overlapping

POS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100159 20-30 Redburn Trading Estate, En3 4Le Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100160 7-39 Redburn Trading Estate, En3 4Le Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100161 32-48 Redburn Trading Estate, En3 4Le Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100162 2-20 Falcon Crescent, En3 4Lr Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100164 Wharf Road (West) En3 4Td Ponders End Ward Overlapping

POS16 London SHLAA 2017 17100165 Wharf Road (East), En3 4Td Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100166 Alma Estate - En3 4Ug Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EHS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100167 Land At The Junction Of The The Ride And High Str*

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

96

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

ELS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100168 The Rifles Public House Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

ELS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100169 Keys Meadow Primary School, En3 6Fb Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

ELS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100170 Soham Lane Open Space - En3 6Hg Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

TUS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100171 Freezywater St George'S Cofe Primary School, En3 *

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

EHS16 London SHLAA 2017 17100173 Millmarsh Lane (East) En3 7Bj

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100174 The Ride, Open Space, En3 7Dy

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

POS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100175 280-290 Alexandra Road, En3 7Eh Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS19 London SHLAA 2017 17100176 Works In Alexandra Road, En3 7En Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EHS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100177 Bilton Way, Industrial Unit, En3 7Er

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

ELS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100178 Innova Park En3 7Fl Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

EHS19 London SHLAA 2017 17100179 72-84 Bilton Way, En3 7Nh

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS20 London SHLAA 2017 17100180 38 Lockfield Avenue, En3 7Nj

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS21 London SHLAA 2017 17100181 1-4 The Arena, Bilton Way, En3 7Nl

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

97

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EHS22 London SHLAA 2017 17100182 5-10 The Arena, Bilton Way, En3 7Nl

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

ELS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100183 Mollison Avenue, Industrial Site, En3 7Nn Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

EHS23 London SHLAA 2017 17100184 Edison Road, Industrial Site, En3 7Pl

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS24 London SHLAA 2017 17100185 Brancroft Way, Power Station, En3 7Pl

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS25 London SHLAA 2017 17100186 16 Lockfield Avenue, En3 7Pu

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

POS20 London SHLAA 2017 17100187 Mill River Trading Estate, En3 7Qf Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS21 London SHLAA 2017 17100188 Suez Road, Warehouse, En3 7Qf Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EHS26 London SHLAA 2017 17100189 111 Millmarsh Lane, En3 7Qg

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS27 London SHLAA 2017 17100190 104 Brancroft Way, En3 7Rg

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS28 London SHLAA 2017 17100192 1-3 Jefrey'S Road, En3 7Ty

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS29 London SHLAA 2017 17100193 Watermill Business Centre, En3 7Xf

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

COS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100194 26 Beech Hill, En4 0Jp Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

COS19 London SHLAA 2017 17100195 103 Camlet Way Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

98

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

COS20 London SHLAA 2017 17100196 En4 0Ps Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

COS21 London SHLAA 2017 17100197 En4 0Ps Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

ELS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100198 Voltage Business Centre, En8 7Rr Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

TUS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100199 Land On Holmesdale Tunnel, En8 8Eq

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

SBS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100200 Enfield Delivery Office, Savoy Parade, Southbury * Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

ELS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100201 Enfield Lock - Thames Water Utilities, King Georg* Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

HIS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100202 200 Enfield Road Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100203 Enfield Road, Open Space Highlands Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100206 5 Dearsley Road, Eros Disco Southbury Ward Overlapping

POS22 London SHLAA 2017 17100208 Fairfield Close Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100209 Former Middlesex University Campus, 188-230 (Even* Ponders End Ward Overlapping

CHS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100210 Forty Hill Chase Ward Site Unavailable

BUS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100211 Foxwood Green Close Bush Hill Park Ward Site Unavailable

EHS30 London SHLAA 2017 17100212 Frederick Crescent

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

JUS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100213 Galliard Road Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100214 Gardiner Close Ponders End Ward Overlapping

99

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

GRS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100215 Gate Lodge, Bush Hill Park Golf Club Grange Ward Site Unavailable

UPS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100216 Genista Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

TOS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100217 St George'S Catholic Primary School Town Ward Site Unavailable

JUS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100218 Edmonton County School (Cambridge Campus) Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

COS22 London SHLAA 2017 17100219 Green Road Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

EHS31 London SHLAA 2017 17100220 Brimsdown Primary School And Playing Fields

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

UPS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100221 St John & St James C Of E Primary School

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

GRS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100222 Cunard Crescent Grange Ward Site Unavailable

COS23 London SHLAA 2017 17100223 Harper Close Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

GRS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100224 Hartland Close Grange Ward Site Unavailable

POS23 London SHLAA 2017 17100225 Enfield Bus Garage (Arriva) Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

SBS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100226 Harveys Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

HAS1 London SHLAA 2017 17100227 West Lea School And Hazelbury Junior School Haselbury Ward Site Unavailable

HAS2 London SHLAA 2017 17100228 The Latymer School Haselbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100229 Haslemere Industrial Estate Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

100

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

PAS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100230 Hazelwood Junior School

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

EHS32 London SHLAA 2017 17100231 Hertford Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

LOS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100232 St.Edmund'S Catholic Primary School

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

EHS33 London SHLAA 2017 17100233 The College Of Haringey

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

WIS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100235 Highfield Road Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

SOS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100236 High Street Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SBS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100237 Hunter Vehicles Ltd Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

EDS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100238 Latymer All Saints Church Of England Primary Scho*

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

JUS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100239 Hyde Works Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

COS24 London SHLAA 2017 17100240 Imperial Grove Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

POS24 London SHLAA 2017 17100241 Jeffreys Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

TOS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100242 John Keats Lodge Town Ward Site Unavailable

WIS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100243 J Sainsbury Plc Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

TUS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100244 Kempe Road

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

101

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

POS25 London SHLAA 2017 17100245 Hertford Road - Housing Estate Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

ELS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100246 Kinetic Crescent Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

ELS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100247 Kinetic Crescent (Includign Oasis Academy) Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

POS26 London SHLAA 2017 17100248 St Marys Catholic Primary School Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EDS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100249 Eley'S Estate (West), Kynoch Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100250 Eley'S Estate (East), Kynoch Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100251 Ladderswood Estate Station Road

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

CHS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100252 Land At Chase Ward Site Unavailable

UPS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100255 Land, North Circular Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

POS27 London SHLAA 2017 17100256 Dujardin Mews, 143 South Street Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

UPS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100257 Lansbury Way

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

HAS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100258 Churchfield Primary School Haselbury Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100259 Lee House, Waterways Business Park Enfield Lock Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100260 Meridian Water, Leeside Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

102

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

POS28 London SHLAA 2017 17100261 Leggatt Freightways Group Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

BUS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100263 Edmonton County School Bush Hill Park Ward Site Unavailable

EHS34 London SHLAA 2017 17100264 46 Brancroft Way

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS35 London SHLAA 2017 17100265 56-98 Lockfield Avenue

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS36 London SHLAA 2017 17100266 41-97 Lockfield Avenue

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

TUS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100268 Honilands Primary School

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

SBS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100269 Magnet Ltd Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS16 London SHLAA 2017 17100270 Bush Hill Park Primary School Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

TOS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100271 Enfield Grammar School Upper Town Ward Site Unavailable

SBS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100272 Martinbridge Industrial Estate Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100273 Martinbridge Industrial Estate Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

CHS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100274 Melling Drive Chase Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100275 Meridian Water, Meridian Way

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

POS30 London SHLAA 2017 17100276 Meridian Way, Enfield Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100277 Millets Grange Ward Overlapping

103

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EHS37 London SHLAA 2017 17100278 Millmarsh Lane, Brimsdown

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS39 London SHLAA 2017 17100280 1050 Mollison Avenue

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS40 London SHLAA 2017 17100281 Mollison Avenue Electricity Station

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100282 Moorfield Road Clinic, Moorfield Road Southbury Ward Overlapping

POS31 London SHLAA 2017 17100283 Morson Road, Riverside Estate (South) Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS32 London SHLAA 2017 17100284 Morson Road, Riverside Estate (North) Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS33 London SHLAA 2017 17100285 Morson Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

POS34 London SHLAA 2017 17100286 Works In Meridian Way Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100287 Arnos Grove Station Car Park - West

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

SGS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100288 Marconi Place

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

UPS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100292 4 Watermill Lane, N18 1Fa

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

EDS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100294 Laundry Site, Brettenham Road, N18 2Hz

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100295 Pegamoid Road, N18 2Ng

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

104

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDS16 London SHLAA 2017 17100296 Stacey Avenue, N18 2Nn

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100297 N18 2Pd

Edmonton Green Ward Overlapping

UPS16 London SHLAA 2017 17100298 Highmead Estate - N18 2Rj

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

EDS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100299 Advent Way, N18 3Ag

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100300 Meridian Way And Angel Road, N18 3Ah

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS19 London SHLAA 2017 17100301 Eley Road, N18 3Bb

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS20 London SHLAA 2017 17100302 Rainstar Estate, N18 3Bh

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS21 London SHLAA 2017 17100303 Nobel Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS22 London SHLAA 2017 17100304 17-28 Stacey Avenue, N18 3Pp

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100305 Arriva Parking Garage

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100306 Towpath Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

105

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100307 Trading Estates

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

WIS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100308 Friend'S Meeting House, N21 1Bh Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100309 Thames Water Site And Open Space, N21 3Lx Winchmore Hill Ward Overlapping

HAS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100310 Toddlers Pre-School Haselbury Ward Site Unavailable

POS35 London SHLAA 2017 17100311 Church Of Mary Mother Of God Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EDS23 London SHLAA 2017 17100312 Nobel Road And Kynoch Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS24 London SHLAA 2017 17100313 Nobel Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

POS36 London SHLAA 2017 17100314 Northampton Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

BOS3 London SHLAA 2017 17100315 Oakthorpe Park Estate (Arla Foods Plc) Bowes Ward Site Unavailable

PAS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100316 St. Anne'S Catholic School For Girls

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100317 Oakwood Station Car Park Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

SBS33 London SHLAA 2017 17100319 Northgate Business Centre Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100320 Palace Gardens Grange Ward Overlapping

EDS25 London SHLAA 2017 17100321 Pegamoid Road

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

106

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SOS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100322 Asda Southgate Circus Supercentre Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SBS19 London SHLAA 2017 17100323 Southbury Road Depot Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SGS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100324 Builders Depot

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

TUS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100325 Pitfield Way

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100326 P J Transport - High Road West (Dea 9)

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

LOS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100327 Plevna Road

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

POS37 London SHLAA 2017 17100328 Alma Estate - Ponders End Youth Centre Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

SBS20 London SHLAA 2017 17100329 Pride Oils Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

ELS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100330 Prince Of Wales Childrens Centre Gardens Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

COS25 London SHLAA 2017 17100331 Priory Close Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100332 Public Open Space, Freezy Water Enfield Lock Ward

Insufficient Information Available

UPS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100333 Queen Street

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

BUS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100335 Raglan Infant School Bush Hill Park Ward Site Unavailable

ELS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100336 Rammey Marsh Part Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

107

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

UPS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100337 Raynham Primary School

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

WIS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100338 Recreation Ground, Winchmore Hill Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

WIS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100339 St. Paul'S Ce Primary School Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

JUS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100340 Houndsfield Primary School Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

TOS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100341 River Front Town Ward Site Unavailable

CHS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100342 Rosemary Avenue Chase Ward Site Unavailable

POS38 London SHLAA 2017 17100343 Rossmore Close Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EHS41 London SHLAA 2017 17100344 Ryder Plc

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

SBS21 London SHLAA 2017 17100345 Safe Store Trading Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

PAS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100346 Safeway, Palmers Green

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

SBS22 London SHLAA 2017 17100347 Safeway Superstore, Enfield Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS23 London SHLAA 2017 17100348 Sainsburys, Enfield Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

ELS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100349 Prince Of Wales Childrens Centre Buildings Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

POS39 London SHLAA 2017 17100350 Scotland Green Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

EDS26 London SHLAA 2017 17100351 Second Avenue

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

108

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

TUS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100352 Sedley Close

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

UPS19 London SHLAA 2017 17100353 10-14 Commercial Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

UPS20 London SHLAA 2017 17100354 1A & 1B Shaftesbury Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

PAS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100355 Shapland Way

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

ELS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100356 Solar Way Enfield Lock Ward Site Unavailable

SBS24 London SHLAA 2017 17100357 George Spicer Primary School Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS25 London SHLAA 2017 17100358 Southbury Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS26 London SHLAA 2017 17100359 Kingsmead School Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SOS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100361 Southern Syringe Services / New Universal House Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SOS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100362 Southgate College Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SGS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100363 Southgate House, Nursing Home

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

SOS16 London SHLAA 2017 17100364 Southgate Station Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

PAS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100365 Southgate Town Hall

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100366 South Lodge Crescent Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

109

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

POS40 London SHLAA 2017 17100367 St Matthew'S C Of E Primary School Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

SGS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100368 Garfield Primary School

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100371 Sterling Way

Upper Edmonton Ward

Insufficient Information Available

EHS42 London SHLAA 2017 17100373 2 Stockingswater Lane

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS43 London SHLAA 2017 17100374 Car Park In Stockingswater Lane

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100375 Stonard Road Winchmore Hill Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100376 Stonehill Business Park

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100377 Stonycroft Close

Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

EHS44 London SHLAA 2017 17100378 Suez Road And Dundee Way

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

EHS45 London SHLAA 2017 17100379 Suez Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

COS26 London SHLAA 2017 17100380 Sussex Way Cockfosters Ward Site Unavailable

POS41 London SHLAA 2017 17100381 Swansea Road Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

110

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

EDS27 London SHLAA 2017 17100382 Fleecefield Primary School

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

HAS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100383 Tanners End Lane Haselbury Ward Site Unavailable

WIS8 London SHLAA 2017 17100385 The Bourne, Southgate Reservoir Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

SOS17 London SHLAA 2017 17100386 Walker Primary School Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SGS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100387 Our Lady Of Lourdes Roman Catholic Primary School

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100388 Theobalds Park Road Chase Ward Overlapping

POS42 London SHLAA 2017 17100389 Waverley School Ponders End Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100390 Oak Hill Pharm, The Bungalow Chase Ward

Insufficient Information Available

EDS28 London SHLAA 2017 17100391 Thornton Road And Meridian Way

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

EDS29 London SHLAA 2017 17100392 Thornton Road Depot

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

UPS22 London SHLAA 2017 17100393 Tile Kiln Lane

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

BOS4 London SHLAA 2017 17100394 St Michael At Bowes Church Of England Junior Scho* Bowes Ward Site Unavailable

BOS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100395 Tottenhall Infant School And Children'S Centre Bowes Ward Site Unavailable

111

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100396 Towpath Road

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

SBS28 London SHLAA 2017 17100397 Calkmill Pharm, Toys R Us Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

EHS46 London SHLAA 2017 17100398 Trafalgar Trading Estate

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

SBS29 London SHLAA 2017 17100399 196 Great Cambridge Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

TOS10 London SHLAA 2017 17100400 Trinity Street Town Ward Site Unavailable

JUS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100401 Turin Road Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

CHS13 London SHLAA 2017 17100402 St. Ignatus College (West) Chase Ward Site Unavailable

CHS14 London SHLAA 2017 17100403 St Ignatius College (East) Chase Ward Site Unavailable

LOS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100404 Unit 2-4 Pickett'S Lock Lane

Lower Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

JUS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100405 Unit 3 Great Cambridge Industrial Estate Jubilee Ward Site Unavailable

PAS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100406 Unit 3 C & D, Regents Avenue Industrial Estate

Palmers Green Ward Site Unavailable

EHS47 London SHLAA 2017 17100407 Brimsdown Works, U O P Ltd

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

TUS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100408 Vacant Land, Turkey Brook

Turkey Street Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100409 Vacant Land, Mollison Avenue Enfield Lock Ward Overlapping

112

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100410 Vacant Land Rear Of Pumping Station Chase Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100411 Vehicle Inspectorate

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100412 Vicarage Farm Highlands Ward Overlapping

WIS9 London SHLAA 2017 17100413 Keble Preparatory School Winchmore Hill Ward Site Unavailable

EHS48 London SHLAA 2017 17100414 Walcot Road

Enfield Highway Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100415 Arnos Grove Station Car Park - East

Southgate Green Ward Overlapping

UPS23 London SHLAA 2017 17100416 Watermill Lane

Upper Edmonton Ward Site Unavailable

BUS5 London SHLAA 2017 17100417 Wellington Road Bush Hill Park Ward Site Unavailable

SGS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100418 Westminster Drive

Southgate Green Ward Site Unavailable

SGS12 London SHLAA 2017 17100289

Land Adjacent To New Southgate Station Southgate Green Ward

Overlapping

TOS11 London SHLAA 2017 17100419 Whitakers Lodge Town Ward Site Unavailable

CHS15 London SHLAA 2017 17100420 Whitewebbs Road Chase Ward Site Unavailable

GRS6 London SHLAA 2017 17100421 Windmill Hill Grange Ward Site Unavailable

SBS30 London SHLAA 2017 17100422 Wm Morrison Supermarkets Plc Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

113

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

HIS7 London SHLAA 2017 17100423 Highlands School And Grange Park Primary School Highlands Ward Site Unavailable

SOS18 London SHLAA 2017 17100424 Pennington Drive, Housing Estate Southgate Ward Site Unavailable

SBS31 London SHLAA 2017 17100425 Baird Road Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS32 London SHLAA 2017 17100426 7 Crown Road, Yoplait Site (Former), Enfield Southbury Ward Site Unavailable

SBS34a London SHLAA 2017

17100204 Enfield Town Railway Station/Delivery Office a Southbury Ward

Overlapping

COS27 London SHLAA 2017 17100427 New Avenue Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100428 1 Hansart Way Highlands Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100429 Snell'S Park Housing Estate

Upper Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100430 Osward Place

Lower Edmonton Ward Overlapping

EDS30 London SHLAA 2017 17100431 The Mews

Edmonton Green Ward Site Unavailable

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100433 Old Labour Exchange

Palmers Green Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100434 Cart Overthrown

Lower Edmonton Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100435 Bury Street West Bush Hill Park Ward Overlapping

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100205 Enfield Town Station Southbury Ward Overlapping

114

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

<Null> London SHLAA 2017 17100384 Tesco, Southbury Rd, Enfiled Southbury Ward Overlapping

<Null> SHLAA 2017 17100291 M&S Food Southgate Overlapping

COS2 SHLAA 2017 17100009 357 Cockfosters Road Cockfosters Ward Overlapping

CHS8 SHLAA 2017 17100152 Garden Centre In Cattlegate Road Chase Ward Overlapping

BUP20 Planning Permissions 18/03469/FUL Construction of a 3rd floor to provide 3 x 2 bed self contained flats.

Bush Hill Park Overlapping

BUP4 Planning Permissions 16/03613/FUL Erection of 2 x 4- bed 3 storey semi detached single family dwellings

Bush Hill Park Overlapping

CHP3 Planning Permissions 15/01788/RE4

Demolition of existing bungalow and horticultural glasshouses and erection of a single storey Secondary Tuition Centre (D1 use) for up to 100 pupils with associated car parking, multi use games areas at rear and associated landscaping. Chase Overlapping

COP34 Planning Permissions 18/01591/OUT

Principle of sub-division of residential use on site; formation of vehciluar access to the rear and landscaping (All other matters Reserved). Cockfosters Overlapping

COP41 Planning Permissions 18/03296/FUL

Redevelopment of site and erection of a detached building comprising 1 x 1-bed and 3 x 2-bed self-contained flats with rooms in roofspace together with erection of a detached 1 x 2-bed bungalow at the bottom of the rear garden. Cockfosters Overlapping

EDP13 Planning Permissions 17/02694/RE4 Change of use of existing store and walkway to 1 x studio flat with private amenity space.

Edmonton Green Overlapping

EDP14 Planning Permissions 17/02695/RE4 Change of use of existing store and walkway to 1 x studio flat with private amenity space.

Edmonton Green Overlapping

EDP25 Planning Permissions 18/03658/FUL Sub-division of site and erection of a end-of-terraced 2-storey block of 6 self-contained flats (6 x 1-bed).

Edmonton Green Overlapping

EHP12 Planning Permissions 16/03526/PRJ Change of use of first floor from office (B1a) to 2 flats (C3) (1 x 2-bed, 1 x studio).

Enfield Highway Overlapping

EHP28 Planning Permissions 18/03575/FUL

Demolition of existing structures at rear and erection of a single storey rear extension, to provide a 1 x 3-bed self contained unit with private amenity space, together with

Enfield Highway Overlapping

115

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

change of use of part ground floor to office use (Class B1), conversion of upper floors into 6 x self contained flats (3 x 1-bed, 3 x 2-bed), involving a first and second floor rear extensions, gable ends and alterations to fenestration with associated parking.

GRP4 Planning Permissions 15/05573/PRJ Change of use from first floor office (B1) to 2 x residential flats (C3). Grange Overlapping

POP38 Planning Permissions 15/02040/FUL

Full planning application for Phase 1a of the Alma Estate master plan comprising the demolition of buildings on those locations specified in the site address (including 163 residential units and associated works) and the construction of 228 residential units in two (four to sixteen storey) buildings, 150sqm of restaurant/cafe (A3) floorspace at ground floor, 439sqm of gym (D2) floorspace at ground and first floor, new and improved open space and play facilities, cycle and refuse storage, car parking, new access arrangements and highway works, relocation and reprovision of telecommunications equipment, landscape and ancillary works. (An Environmental Statement, including a non-technical summary, also accompanies the planning application in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011 (as amended by the 2015 Regulations)).

Ponders End Overlapping

SBP5 Planning Permissions 17/02208/FUL

Subdivision and refurbishment of site including change of use to create 2 industrial units (Use Class B1/B2/B8) together with alterations to external appearance, creation of new access and servicing, alterations to existing vehicular access /egress, provision of new sub-station, car parking and associated hard and soft landscaping. Southbury Overlapping

SGP20 Planning Permissions 18/02042/FUL

Conversion of building into 4 x 3-bed and 1 x 2-bed self-contained flats involving ground floor and first floor rear extensions, raised patio at rear and alterations to roof (PART RETROSPECTIVE).

Southgate Green Overlapping

116

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SOP12 Planning Permissions 17/03798/FUL Erection of 2 x storage containers for use as puppy and dog training (temporary use of 12 months). Southgate Overlapping

SOP26 Planning Permissions 18/03028/FUL Erection of 2 x storage containers for use as puppy and dog training (temporary use for 2 years). Southgate Overlapping

SOP8 Planning Permissions 17/00174/PRJ

Change of use of a building from office use (Class B1(a)) to 74 self-contained units comprising 25 x 1-bed, 47 x 2-bed and 2 x 3-bed (Class C3). Southgate Overlapping

SOP9 Planning Permissions 17/01324/FUL First and second floor rear extension to create 2 x 3 bed self-contained flats. Southgate Overlapping

WIP14 Planning Permissions 18/01099/FUL

Redevelopment of site and erection of 10 single family dwellings comprising 3 x 2 bed, 6 x 3 bed and 1 x 4 bed with associated amenity space, parking and landscaping.

Winchmore Hill Overlapping

WIP20 Planning Permissions 18/02207/FUL

Conversion of single family dwelling house into 2 x 3-bed and 1 x 2-bed self-contained flats involving part single, part two storey rear extension, front, side, rear dormers with side rooflights and alterations to fenestration at side.

Winchmore Hill Overlapping

WIP30 Planning Permissions 18/04712/FUL Construction of a 5-bedroom single family dwelling with rooms in loft space.

Winchmore Hill Overlapping

WIP33 Planning Permissions 19/00412/FUL

Erection of a total of 10 single family dwellinghouses comprising 3 x 2-bed houses accessed via Cedars Road and 7 x 4-bed houses on Carpenter Gardens, with associated car parking, access, extension to Cedars Road cul-de-sac and landscaping.

Winchmore Hill Overlapping

WIP9 Planning Permissions 17/03128/FUL

Redevelopment of site by the erection of a detached 2-storey, 4-bed dwelling house with vehicular access and amenity space.

Winchmore Hill Overlapping

<Null> Planning Applications 17/02152/FUL

Turley Silvermere Stonehill Upper Edmonton Overlapping

<Null> Planning Applications 16/05909/RE4

Meridian Works 5, 6, 9 And 9A Orbital Business Park 5 Argon Road

Upper Edmonton ward Overlapping

<Null> Planning Applications 19/03036/FUL

Montagu Ind Est, Montagu Road, Edmonton Edmonton Green Overlapping

117

List of Rejected Sites

Site HELAA

Reference Site Source

Site Source Reference

Site name / address Ward Reason for Exclusion

SBS34 Planning Applications 18/04485/FUL Chalkmill Drive, Crown Road Southbury Ward Overlapping

<Null> Planning Applications 17/02151/FUL Silvermere Site Stonehill Business Park London

Upper Edmonton ward Overlapping

EHP6 Planning Applications 20/00533/PRJ Unit 6 Sovereign Business Centre 33 Stockingswater Lane Enfield

Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

EHP60 Planning Applications 20/00284/PAB Unit 7 Sovereign Business Centre 33 Stockingswater Lane Enfield

Enfield Highway Ward Overlapping

118

Appendix H: Sites Excluded due to being 100% within Level 1 constraints

Site Source

Reference Site name / address Reason for Exclusion

LP1109 The Shires Estate, Cavendish Road, N18 2HT 90% of site covered by Level 1 constraints and only around 10% covered by level 2 constraints which contains existing housing.

LP615 Car parking space around and behind the Crown & Anchor

Covered by Flood Zone 3

LP615 Building on Fore St Covered by Flood Zone 3

LP615 Barrowfield close, car parking space Covered by Flood Zone 3

LP615 Surface car park on Jeremy’s Green Covered by Flood Zone 3

LP615 Garages at the end of Jeremy’s Green Covered by Flood Zone 3

Not applicable

Garages at the end of Jeremy’s Green Covered by Flood Zone 3

119

Appendix I: Sites Assessed as being “not developable within the 15 year plan period”

Site HELAA Reference

Site name / address Overall Conclusion Notes

Housing Sites

CHP22 Longbourn Forty Hill Enfield EN2 9EU Scheme was refused as not considered suitable for small C1 use in isolation. A net increase of dwellings is not anticipated in this location.

COP40 Rear Of 22 Covert Way Enfield North Barnet

Reason for refusal: The proposed family dwelling, by reason of the proposed siting, together within its scale and form would result in significant harm to the back land garden site and the character and appearance of the surrounding area

COS16 Cockfosters Station The site is not suitable. It is the station building, which is a listed building.

EHC1 Site next to Brimsdown Station Mollison Ave Site withdrawn by promoter.

EHP15 48 Orchardleigh Avenue Enfield

Not suitable for intensification (Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by reason of the inadequate floor area of the first and second floor flat, taken together with the sloping roof of the living area, which would further reduce the useable space, and the unclear amenity space provision for this flat, would result in an inappropriate subdivision, an over-intensive use of the property and a cramped and poor standard of accommodation for future residents.)

EHP20 76 Ashford Crescent Enfield

Reason for refusal: The proposed assisted living facility with potential to accommodate 10 people and above by virtue of the associated activity and an over intensive use of the property would lead to an unacceptable increase in activity, general noise and disturbance associated with the proposed level of occupation which would detract from the residential character and amenities

EHP39 2 Lansbury Road Enfield

Not appropriate for redevelopment Reason for refusal: The proposed development, by virtue of the number of the occupants at the premises, would be an over intensive use of the property, leading to an unacceptable increase in activity, general noise and disturbance associated with the proposed level of occupation which would detract

120

Site HELAA Reference

Site name / address Overall Conclusion Notes

from the residential character and amenities enjoyed by the occupants of the neighbouring residential properties and the amenities of the future occupiers.

EHS49 1-32 Anemone Court Excluded due to recent residential development on site. Assumed no longer available.

ELC4 Ferndale Road Garages Not available due to safeguarding for Crossrail 2

ELP37 59 Mandeville Road Enfield

No net gain in units on site achievable (Reason for refusal: The development provides a substandard quantum of retained external amenity space for the donor property No 59 and fails to provide direct access to private amenity spaces for future occupiers of the two flats, resulting in substandard level of living accommodation.)

GRD6 London Road Island Availability unknown. No scope for infill

GRE21 Multi storey car park incorporating Lidl – Sydney Road Not developable due to unavailability

GRP33 144 Wades Hill London Refused application did not lead to net increase of units. Assumed no capacity to deliver additional homes.

GRS1 52 Sydney Road Assumed no longer available due to recently completed residential development on site

JUS9 Land At Rear Of 93-125 St. Edmunds Road, Excluded due to recent residential development on site. Assumed no longer available.

POP7 1-40 Robin Hall Gardiner Close Already delivered

SBS27 Southbury Station The site was not submitted as part of the Call for Sites and therefore assumed not available. Inadequate evidence submitted to demonstrate residential development could be deliverable.

SGD11 Arnos Grove Local Centre and Arnos Grove Station Not suitable for redevelopment due to listed buildings.

SGD5 Arnos Pool, Bowes Road Library and Arnos Grove Medical Centre

Not suitable for redevelopment due to listed buildings.

SGP36 109, Station Road, London, Already delivered.

SGS1 1-5 Lynton Court, 80 - 98 Bowes Road Already delivered. Therefore assumed no longer available.

SOG1 Southgate Station - Plan 6 Not identified for residential use

121

Site HELAA Reference

Site name / address Overall Conclusion Notes

SOS12 Oakwood Station Assumed not available as not submitted as part of more recent call for sites from same landowner. Planning application coming forward on station car park site.

TOS1 9-85 Parsonage Lane Already delivered. Therefore assumed no longer available.

UPC6b Meridian Water Area (excluding planning application areas) - East bank

Could be considered potentially developable subject to review of SIL policy designation.

CFS198-1 Kenninghall Open Space South,Kenninghall Road, London, N18 2PE

North London Waste Plan protection for Recycling capacity. Also designated open space in an area of deficiency.

CFS223 Stable Yard Broomfield Park, Broomfield Lane, London Significant heritage value would indicate a sensitive approach to restoration of the existing buildings are required. The site is located within a local open space.

CFS228 Portcullis Car Park Silver Street Site is proposed for a land swap arrangement rather than development.

CFS228 1-3 Gentlemans Row, Enfield 8- 12 apartments for residential conversion/ground floor office/restaurant with 6 flats above/hotel (30-40 beds),

CFS215 Church Lane Car Park & 58-60 Silver Street, Enfield, Existing building has heritage value.

Employment sites

SBC6 46 Crown Road, EN1 1TH Considered not developable within plan period due to presence of

Grade II listed building on site, which would significantly impede ability to generate an employment floorspace uplift.