Electrostatic Charging of Nonpolar Colloids by Reverse Micelles
Effect of active QW population on optical characteristics of polar, semipolar and nonpolar...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of Effect of active QW population on optical characteristics of polar, semipolar and nonpolar...
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
1
Effect of active QW population on optical characteristics of
polar, semipolar and nonpolar III-nitride light emitters
Mikhail V. Kisin*, Chih-Li Chuang, and Hussein S. El-Ghoroury
Ostendo Technologies, Inc., 6185 Paseo del Norte, Ste. 200, Carlsbad, CA 92011, USA
*E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract. QW population effects are compared in III-nitride light-emitters with different levels of
polarity. We show that wider nonpolar active QWs are characterized by increased QW transparency
current and reduced differential optical gain which consequently increases the laser threshold. We
also show that high intra-QW recombination rates in nonpolar/semipolar structures make the QW
populations strongly non-equilibrium and vulnerable to inhomogeneous QW injection. In LED
regime, structures with different polarity level reveal different mechanisms of the efficiency droop.
In polar structures, the droop is dominated by the electron leakage and is noticeably affected by the
active region ballistic overshoot. Efficiency droop in semipolar/nonpolar structures is dominated by
combined effect of radiative time saturation and nonradiative Auger recombination.
Keywords: III-nitrides, laser diodes, light emitting diodes, injection efficiency, radiative efficiency,
carrier leakage.
PACS: 42.55.Px, 42.72.Bj, 78.67.De, 85.60.Bt
This is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication/published in
Semiconductor Science and Technology. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or
omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it. The Version of Record is
available online at DOI 10.1088/0268-1242/27/2/024012.
1. Introduction
Optical characteristics of III-nitride light emitters are expected to be superior in QW structures grown in
nonpolar or semipolar orientations (Waltereit et al., 2000). Reduced intra-QW polarization fields and
enhanced overlap between electron and hole states participating in optical transitions improves the QW
radiative recombination rate and increases the optical output of nonpolar/semipolar structures. QW structures
designed for laser applications also benefit from the possible use of wider field-free active QWs which
provide for better optical mode confinement, higher modal optical gain, and as a result, allow simplified
design of laser structure (Feezell et al., 2007). Lower rate of indium incorporation during the nonpolar growth
(Strittmatter et al., 2011) gives additional motivation for using wider QW layers to curb the effect of carrier
quantum confinement, especially in longer-wavelength emitters.
Large carrier effective masses in III-nitride semiconductors result in higher subband density of states (DOS)
entailing higher level of QW transparency injection, typically above 4x1012
/cm2
(Hader et al., 2007).
Corresponding increase in laser threshold discourages multi-QW (MQW) active region designs and supports
using a smaller number of active QWs optimized for efficient emission at higher injection levels (Kisin et al.,
2009a). Using wide QWs can become inappropriate at this point (Kisin et al., 2009b). Additional
complications come from uneven and imbalanced populations of different QWs and strong disparity of
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
2
electron and hole injection in MQW III-nitride structures (Kisin and El-Ghoroury, 2010a). In an ideal active
region design, in order to prevent some of the active QWs from under-pumping, different QWs should be
optimized differently.
In this work, we compare optical gain and efficiency characteristics of polar, semipolar, and nonpolar three-
QW diode structures with active QWs designed for the same emission wavelength at the highest injection
level of 5x1013
/cm2. We show that in wide nonpolar QWs the thermal carrier redistribution among closely
separated subbands outweighs the benefits of enhanced dipole matrix elements and can increase the lasing
threshold, especially in laser diodes with Auger-dominated threshold currents. We also show that high intra-
QW recombination rates make the populations of active QWs strongly non-equilibrium. Due to asymmetrical
carrier injection, even in nonpolar MQW structures the QW populations remain unbalanced and
inhomogeneous. In our 3-QW illustrative example, the best performance was demonstrated by semipolar
structure with optimized 4 nm QW width.
2. Active QWs
For laser active region simulation we employed COMSOL-based Ostendo’s Optoelectronic Device Modeling
Software (ODMS) described in details elsewhere (Kisin and El-Ghoroury, 2010b). Special attention was paid
to thorough microscopic modeling of carrier confinement and radiative characteristics of active QWs.
Valence subband spectrum was calculated using the Rashba-Sheka-Pikus 6x6 matrix Hamiltonian for strained
wurtzite semiconductors in arbitrary crystallographic configuration (Kisin et al., 2009a). The resulting multi-
band equation system for QW eigenstates was solved self-consistently with Poisson’s equation taking into
account effects of intra-QW polarization field screening and thermal carrier redistribution between the QW
subbands and contiguous extended bulk-like states. QW radiative characteristics have been then obtained by
k-space and spectral integrations of interband optical transitions for each pair of QW subband. This
automatically includes into our simulations the radiative time saturation effect due to phase-space filling at
high QW population levels (David and Grundmann, 2010). On the other hand, to uniquely identify the QW
population effects and allow direct comparison between different structures, the carrier kinetic and non-
radiative recombination parameters have been treated phenomenologically and assumed to be the same for all
modeled structures; see table 1. These values are close to typical experimental estimates (Zhang et al., 2009).
One order of magnitude increase of SRH lifetimes in QW layers has been also adopted to simulate the
enhancement of radiative efficiency in III-nitride QWs due to indium compositional fluctuations (Chichibu et
al., 1996). To further facilitate comparison, we also assume the same small homogeneous optical transition
broadening of 10 meV for all QWs. Microscopic band structure parameters have been mostly adopted from a
single source (Vurgaftman and Meyer, 2007); the valence to conduction band offsets ratio was kept as 3:7 for
all interfaces.
Table 1. Assumed material parameters
QW electron (hole) capture time 5 (1) ps
QW (bulk) carrier SRH lifetime 10 (1) ns
QW (bulk) Auger coefficient 10-17
cm4/s (10
-30 cm
6/s)
Bulk radiative constant 0.2x10-10
cm3/s
Electron (hole) mobility 200 (10) cm2/V·s
Electron ballistic velocity 2x107 cm/s
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
3
Table 2 compares the calculated nominal characteristics of active QWs at low and high injection. Low
injection level corresponds to QW transparency; low-injection optical gain characteristics have been
evaluated at doubled transparency concentration value. Our choice of QW widths and compositions is aimed
to illustrate the adverse effect of thermal carrier redistribution between the closely separated subbands in
wider quantum wells with nominally the same emission. It also reflects lower indium intake currently
characteristic for the nonpolar structure growth. The barrier materials contain 2% indium and all layers are
assumed to be strained to GaN template lattice. QW strain components and components of peak gain
coefficient are presented in the coordinate system with z-axis taken along the structure growth direction and
x-axis parallel to [11-20] crystallographic direction. The x-axis is contained within the growth plane for each
crystallographic template. In nonpolar and semipolar structures x-axis thus represents the inclination axis of
the crystallographic coordinate system. For laser waveguide strips oriented along the c-axis projection, the x-
component of the gain coefficient corresponds to the TE gain, which is the only component shown for
differential gain characteristics in table 2. Modal gain coefficients have been estimated using nominal optical
mode confinement factor equal to the ratio of QW width to the QW emission wavelength. This simplified
estimation allows for comparison of the active QWs independently on any particular waveguide designs.
Structure injection characteristics which depend on detailed layout will be addressed in the next section. All
radiative characteristics in table 2 take into account only the optical output originating from the transitions
between the lowest conduction subband and two upper valence subbands dominating the optical gain
spectrum; the related effective radiative parameters have been calculated with respect to the total carrier
concentration in QW layer. Efficiency of the lowest (lasing) subband population is indicated in table 2 as a
percentage of this total.
Table 2. Comparative QW characteristics at transparency and high-injection levels
Template orientation (0001) (11-22) (11-20)
QW width, nm 2.5 4.0 8.0
QW composition Ga0.75In0.25N Ga0.80In0.20N Ga0.82In0.18N
QW strain, % a -2.72/-2.72/1.57/0.0 -2.18/-2.02/1.66/-0.07 -1.97/-1.77/1.27/0.0
QW bandgap (strained), eV 2.568 2.626 2.693
Carrier injection, 1012
/cm2 3.38 30 3.75 30 5.37 30
QW internal field, MV/cm -2.37 -1.20 0.09 0.05 0.0 0.0
Spontaneous emission , nm 488 455 454 447 452 449
Subband population, c1 (hh1), % 100 (85) 89 (74) 100 (61) 76 (52) 83 (33) 54 (30)
Radiative lifetime, ns 24.1 1.79 6.25 1.97 9.94 4.11
Radiative constant, 10-5
cm2/s 1.22 1.88 4.25 1.69 1.87 0.81
Radiative efficiency, % 20.3 5.87 45.6 5.31 22.9 2.62
Peak modal gain G, cm-1
b 10/10/0.08 123/123/1.1 55/1.6/3.1 188/16/42 40/0.12/5.6 123/0.39/41
∂GTE/∂N , 10-9
cm 4.1 4.3 12 3.1 6.7 2.6
∂GTE/∂Jrad (∂GTE/∂Jtot), cm/A 166 (24) 23 (0.87) 274 (85) 28 (0.50) 267 (31) 49 (0.45)
a xx/yy/zz/yz components
b x/y/z components
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
4
From table 2 it is readily seen that decreased population efficiency of the lasing states in the widest nonpolar
QW outweighs the benefits of enhanced dipole matrix elements; thermal carrier redistribution between the
closely separated and less optically active subbands deteriorates the radiative and gain characteristics. Figures
1-4 illustrate this effect in more details.
Figure 1 compares the structure of valence band subbands accounting for hole redistribution. Subband
dispersions along the x- and y-axes are indicated, correspondingly, by solid and dashed lines; for the polar
QW with hexagonal in-plane symmetry these dispersions coincide. In narrow polar QW the overall DOS
distribution is more favorable for efficient optical emission than the crowded subband structure of the wider
nonpolar QW. It is also important that due to hexagonal c-plane symmetry two upper hole subbands in polar
QW include a nearly equal mix of x- and y-polarized Bloch functions and, therefore, are both TE optically
active. Thermal hole redistribution between these subbands does not deteriorate TE gain with increased
injection. On the contrary, in semipolar and nonpolar QWs the states of uppermost hole subband h1 are
predominantly x-polarized. This strain split-off subband accounts for optical anisotropy of nonpolar and
semipolar QWs (Feneberg et al., 2007) and provides strong TE gain enhancement (Scheibenzuber et al.,
2009); see calculated gain components in table 2. With the increased injection, however, the gain in wider
QWs becomes susceptible to thermal hole redistribution into the next subbands with much smaller optical
matrix elements.
Figure 1. Upper valence subbands of polar (0001), semipolar (11-22), and nonpolar (11-20) QWs at the same
injection level of 3x1013
cm-2
. Subband energy is counted from the valence band top at the QW center.
Figure 2 compares the resulting spectra of spontaneous and stimulated radiative recombination rates
calculated at the same high injection level of 3x1013
cm-2
. Presented rates are originated from optical
transitions between the lowest conduction subband and two upper valence subbands, i.e. in laser structures
they recount the main states contributing to the lasing action. At such a high carrier concentration, the intra-
QW screening in the polar QW allows for sufficiently large electron-hole overlap and assures radiative rates
comparable with rates in nonpolar and semipolar structures. Stimulated emission spectra of semipolar and
nonpolar QWs both demonstrate strong rate enhancement for TE polarized emission. The rates, however,
notably decline in the widest (nonpolar) 8 nm QW. Rate reduction between lasing subbands in the widest QW
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
5
is directly related to the carrier redistribution into the upper subbands which concerns not only holes but
electrons as well; see subband population data in table 2. The table presents the relative population of c1 and
h1 subbands with respect to the total QW layer population including the extended bulk-like states. Bulk states
are responsible for sharp decline of c1 relative population in narrow polar QW at high injection level. In
widest (nonpolar) QW, the electron redistribution manifests itself in the reduced spectral width of the c1
subband emission rate essentially determined by electron Fermi level position.
Figure 2. Spectral rates of spontaneous radiative recombination (solid lines) and stimulated recombination per
single photon for TE (dashed lines) and TM (dash-dotted lines) transitions at high QW injection of
3x1013
cm-2
for different template orientations and QW widths: 2.5 nm polar (0001), 4 nm semipolar (11-22),
and 8 nm nonpolar (11-20). Only rates for transitions between the lowest electron and two upper hole
subbands are shown.
Figure 3 compares the TE-gain characteristics of three modeled structures and illustrates optical gain
deterioration in the wide nonpolar QW at high injection levels. Data presented in table 2 also shows the
corresponding increase of the QW transparency concentration. The inset in figure 3 demonstrates strong
impact of the QW width on the gain-current characteristics calculated for our representative choice of non-
radiative recombination parameters from table 1. For low-loss structures, the lasing threshold of the wide
nonpolar QW falls behind the polar structure threshold and, due to the increased QW transparency
concentration, the threshold cannot be recovered by appealing to MQW active region design. In polar QWs,
on the contrary, the threshold current can be lowered by the reduced spatial electron-hole overlap and
decreased radiative losses. Emission characteristics of polar QW also demonstrate some increase at higher
injection levels, above 1013
cm-2
, which is attributed to the onset of strong intra-QW free-carrier screening
and corresponding raise in electron-hole overlap. In addition we note that the Auger coefficient, assumed in
our illustrative simulations to be the same for all modeled structures, can in fact be higher in wide nonpolar
QWs because of wider range of available final states for different indirect Auger transitions, while in polar
QW with reduced spatial electron-hole overlap the Auger recombination can be even suppressed, in analogy
with type-II QW structures (Meyer et al., 1998).
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
6
Figure 3. Nominal TE-gain characteristics for QWs grown in different orientations: squares - polar (0001),
triangles - semipolar (11-22), and circles - nonpolar (11-20). The inset shows gain-current relations near the
QW transparency injection level calculated using the nonradiative recombination parameters of table 1.
3. Inhomogeneous injection in MQW structures
In polar diode structures, polarization charges at the structure interfaces induce high potential barriers for
carrier transport which reduce the injection efficiency of MQW active regions. The total internal efficiency
of the light emitter also suffers a loss if some of the active QWs are under- or over-pumped with either one or
both types of carriers. MQW injection conditions are affected by the highly non-equilibrium character of
active QW populations and large residual QW charges, - even in nonpolar structures. For carrier injection
simulation, ODMS utilizes a drift-diffusive model of carrier transport through extended bulk states coupled
with rate equation systems for each QW (Tessler and Eisenstein, 1993). Strong electrical inhomogeneity of
the polar active regions provides the necessary conditions for the onset of the electronic ballistic transport
effects. To take them into account, we have additionally incorporated a phenomenological model for active
region ballistic overshoot (Kisin and El-Ghoroury, 2011).
Figure 4 clarifies the extent of the non-equilibrium effects in QW population process. The set of curves on the
left panel shows the non-equilibrium electron population in polar QW as a function of the equilibrium value
of QW hole concentration; level of electron injection serves as a curve set parameter. The equilibrium hole
concentration is used as the plot argument only for clarity of presentation in order to characterize the hole
injection level in an unambiguous way. In actual simulations, ODMS uses quasi-Fermi levels of mobile
electron and hole subsystems as independent variables; equilibrium QW carrier populations are calculated
with respect to corresponding quasi-Fermi levels. Non-equilibrium electron and hole QW populations are
obtained as a solution of rate equation system for corresponding QWs. They are self-consistently determined
by the resulting intra-QW recombination rates. In the presented set of curves, the equilibrium electron
concentration can be traced as a starting value of each curve at low hole injection. The curve crowding at the
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
7
highest levels of electron injection 4x1013
/cm2 represents the finite capacity of the electron QW. The hole
QW with higher DOS allows much higher population. At higher level of electron injection (upper curves),
higher hole injection is required for non-equilibrium effects to step in. It is readily seen that for all realistic
injection levels the actual non-equilibrium electron QW populations notably deviate from their equilibrium
values; same effect holds for holes and becomes more pronounced in nonpolar/semipolar QWs with higher
recombination rates. In MQW structures, the non-equilibrium QW populations also depend on the QW
injection conditions for both types of carriers. Residual QW charges modify the carrier transport in diode
structure and provide the feedback for QW injection conditions. Modeling shows that residual QW charges
remain quite high even in nonpolar MQW structures with otherwise electrically uniform active regions. These
charges can be attributed to dissimilar electron-hole transport in III-nitride heterostructures and strong carrier
confinement in deep QWs. The right panel of figure 4 compares QW residual charges in 3-QW polar and
nonpolar diodes of the same design. Each diode structure includes a 15 nm wide electron blocking layer
(EBL) with 15% aluminum content and incorporates 2% indium concentration in QW barriers and n-side
waveguide layer to improve uniformity of QW injection (Kisin and El-Ghoroury, 2010b). Charges of
opposite QWs in the same MQW structure are reversed, with the middle QW practically neutral. Charges of
extreme left or right QWs in polar and nonpolar MQW structures are also reversed which reflects their
different origin. In nonpolar structure, QW charges are determined by carrier injection asymmetry, with n-
side QW1 charged negatively and p-side QW3 charged positively, while in polar structure the positive
polarization charge at the active region side of EBL induces excessive electron accumulation and negative
charge in p-side QW3 (Kisin and El-Ghoroury, 2010b). Note, that in our illustrative simulations, to facilitate
comparison between polar and nonpolar structures, we did not attempt to optimize the EBL, for instance by
polarization matching.
Figure 4. Left: non-equilibrium electron population of 2.5 nm polar QW for different levels of electron and
hole injection. Right: residual QW charges in 3-QW polar (squares) and nonpolar (circles) diode structures
vs. the injection current density: QW1 – solid, QW2 – dash-dot, QW3 – dashed lines; QWs are numbered
from n-side to p-side of the diode.
Inhomogeneous QW injection and non-equilibrium population effects result in different optical output of
active MQWs. Figure 5 compares QW radiative currents in our modeled 3-QW structures of different
polarity. Noticeably, the best uniformity of the radiative current distribution among all three active QWs was
achieved not in the nonpolar diode with wide QWs but in semipolar emitter with optimum 4 nm QW width.
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
8
Figure 5. QW radiative currents in 3-QW diode structures grown on different templates vs. diode injection
current. QWs are numbered from n-side to p-side of the diode and presented by solid (QW1), dash-dot
(QW2), and dashed (QW3) lines.
Strong electrical inhomogeneity of polar MQW structure triggers the onset of the electronic ballistic transport
across the active region (Ni et al., 2010) which additionally contributes to the dominance of the p-side QW in
optical emission. In nonpolar and semipolar structures with indium-enriched separate confinement layers, the
active region is much more uniform and in our simulations ballistic overshoot of the active region was not
seen in these structures at any bias. Active region overshoot also increases the electron leakage from the polar
active region. Figure 6 shows the spatial distribution of injected current components across the active regions
of polar and nonpolar 3-QW emitters at a moderate injection level of 1 kA/cm2. In nonpolar and semipolar
diodes, the leakage is of pure drift-diffusive nature and starts at much higher levels of the current injection.
Left panel of figure 7 compares the total injection efficiencies of the modeled diode structures. Electrical
inhomogeneity of the polar active region reduces the three-QW structure injection efficiency comparing to
single-QW diodes. Radiative efficiencies are compared in figure 7 on the right panel. With our choice of
nonradiative recombination parameters presented in table 1, the decrease of radiative efficiency at high
injection is attributed to the onset of Auger recombination. Once again, we emphasize that employing the
same provisional value of the Auger coefficient for all modeled structures is an illustrative simplification
used here to compare on the same footing structures of different polarity with inherently different radiative
recombination rates and different levels of active region uniformity. While radiative recombination rates have
been explicitly calculated in our model, the nonradiative processes are described phenomenologically, so that
the corresponding coefficients should be treated as fitting parameters and in more elaborate model can
depend on the injection level and QW structure design (Ozgur et al., 2010). Our simulation, however, allows
separate analysis of the injection and radiative efficiencies of the modeled QW structures. In the polar
structure, the efficiency decline at high injection is cushioned to some extent by radiative recombination
enhancement due to more efficient intra-QW screening. Contrarily, in nonpolar and semipolar structures,
phase-space filling in lowest subbands saturates the radiative time for corresponding optical transitions
(David and Grundmann, 2010) and decreases the radiative efficiency with injection. This exacerbates the
detrimental effect of Auger recombination. As expected, the radiative efficiency in each 3-QW diode peaks at
a higher injection current than in the corresponding single-QW structure. In total external efficiency of the
polar structure, however, this shift is concealed by a strong decrease of the structure injection efficiency. As a
result, the efficiency droop in polar and nonpolar diodes have different natures. In polar structures, droop is
dominated by the electron leakage with the strong effect of the active region ballistic overshoot, whilst in
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
9
nonpolar structure the droop is mostly determined by combined effect of radiative time saturation and,
possibly, nonradiative Auger recombination.
Figure 6. Upper panel: electrical inhomogeneity of 3-QW active regions in polar and semipolar diodes.
Thinner lines indicate electronic quasi-Fermi level position. Lower panel: spatial distribution of the injection
current components. Solid lines – polar (0001) structure, dashed lines – semipolar (11-22) structure. Injection
current density is 1 kA/cm2.
Figure 7. Efficiency characteristics of 3-QW (solid lines) and 1-QW (dashed lines) light-emitting diode
structures of different polarity. Inset compares I-V characteristics of polar (lower curves) and semipolar
structures (upper curves) and illustrates stronger electrical inhomogeneity of polar MQW active region.
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
10
4. Conclusions
Optical properties of III-nitride QW structures grown on semipolar and nonpolar crystallographic planes
benefit from reduced QW internal fields and enhanced electron-hole overlap. As a result, wider active QWs
can be used in laser design providing for the higher modal optical gain. Detailed modeling shows, however,
that in wider QWs smaller subband separation and related thermal carrier redistribution overweighs the TE-
gain enhancement, consequently reducing the QW differential optical gain and increasing the laser threshold
in nonpolar structures. We also show that active QW populations in nonpolar/semipolar structures with
inherently high intra-QW recombination rates are strongly non-equilibrium. As a result, even in nonpolar
structures the multi-OW active regions suffer from inhomogeneous QW injection which reduces the total
radiative efficiency of the emitter. Modeling shows that efficiency droops in polar and nonpolar structures
have different origins. In polar structures, the droop is dominated by the electron leakage and is noticeably
affected by the active region ballistic overshoot. Efficiency droop in semipolar and nonpolar structures is
determined by combined effect of radiative time saturation due to lowest subband state filling and, possibly,
nonradiative Auger recombination.
References
Chichibu S, Azuhata T, Sota T and Nakamura S 1996 Spontaneous emission of localized excitons in InGaN
single and multiquantum well structures Appl. Phys. Lett. 69 4188-90
David A and Grundmann M J 2010 Droop in InGaN light-emitting diodes: A differential carrier lifetime
analysis Appl. Phys. Lett. 96 103504-3
Feezell D F, Schmidt M C, Farrell R M, Kim K-C, Saito M, Fujito K, Cohen D A, Speck J S, DenBaars S P
and Nakamura S 2007 AlGaN-Cladding-Free Nonpolar InGaN/GaN Laser Diodes Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
46 L284-L6
Feneberg M, Lipski F, Sauer R, Thonke K, Bruckner P, Neubert B, Wunderer T and Scholz F 2007 Polarized
light emission from semipolar GaInN quantum wells on (1-101) GaN facets J. Appl. Phys. 101
053530-6
Hader J, Moloney J V, Thranhardt A and Koch S W 2007 Nitride semiconductor devices: Principles and
simulation, ed J Piprek (New York: Wiley) pp 145-67
Kisin M V, Brown R G W and El-Ghoroury H S 2009a Optical characteristics of III-nitride quantum wells
with different crystallographic orientations J. Appl. Phys. 105 013112-5
Kisin M V, Brown R G W and El-Ghoroury H S 2009b Optimum quantum well width for III-nitride nonpolar
and semipolar laser diodes Appl. Phys. Lett. 94 021108-3
Kisin M V and El-Ghoroury H S 2010a Inhomogeneous injection in polar and nonpolar III-nitride light-
emitters Solid State Electronics 54 801-5
Kisin M V and El-Ghoroury H S 2010b Modeling of injection characteristics of polar and nonpolar III-nitride
multiple quantum well structures J. Appl. Phys. 107 103106-9
Kisin M V and El-Ghoroury H S 2011 Injection characteristics of polar and nonpolar multiple-QW structures
and active region ballistic overshoot Phys. Status Solidi C 8 2264-6
Meyer J R, Felix C L, Bewley W W, Vurgaftman I, Aifer E H, Olafsen L J, Lindle J R, Hoffman C A, Yang
M J, Bennett B R, Shanabrook B V, Lee H, Lin C H, Pei S S and Miles R H 1998 Auger coefficients
in type-II InAs/GaInSb quantum wells Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 2857-9
Ni X, Li X, Lee J, Liu S, Avrutin V, Ozgur U, Morkoc H and Matulionis A 2010 Hot electron effects on
efficiency degradation in InGaN light emitting diodes and designs to mitigate them J. Appl. Phys. 108
033112-13
Manuscript accepted for publication in Semiconductor Science and Technology 27 (2012)
11
Ozgur U, Huiyong L, Xing L, Xianfeng N and Morkoc H 2010 GaN-Based Light-Emitting Diodes:
Efficiency at High Injection Levels Proceedings of the IEEE 98 1180-96
Scheibenzuber W G, Schwarz U T, Veprek R G, Witzigmann B and Hangleiter A 2009 Calculation of optical
eigenmodes and gain in semipolar and nonpolar InGaN/GaN laser diodes Physical Review B 80
115320
Strittmatter A, Northrup J E, Johnson N M, Kisin M V, Spiberg P, El-Ghoroury H, Usikov A and Syrkin A
2011 Semi-polar nitride surfaces and heterostructures Phys. Status Solidi B 248 561-73
Tessler N and Eisenstein G 1993 Distributed nature of quantum-well lasers Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 10-2
Vurgaftman I and Meyer J R 2007 Nitride semiconductor devices: Principles and simulation, ed J Piprek:
Wiley, New York pp 13-48
Waltereit P, Brandt O, Trampert A, Grahn H T, Menniger J, Ramsteiner M, Reiche M and Ploog K H 2000
Nitride semiconductors free of electrostatic fields for efficient white light-emitting diodes Nature 406
865-8
Zhang M, Bhattacharya P, Singh J and Hinckley J 2009 Direct measurement of auger recombination in
In0.1Ga0.9N/GaN quantum wells and its impact on the efficiency of In0.1Ga0.9N/GaN multiple
quantum well light emitting diodes Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 201108-3