Design of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for detecting cultured and uncultured archaeal...
-
Upload
independent -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
0
Transcript of Design of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for detecting cultured and uncultured archaeal...
Environmental Microbiology (2004)
6
(2) 170ndash182 doi101046j1462-2920200400560x
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Science LtdOxford UKEMIEnvironmental Microbiology1462-2912Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd 20036
2170182
Original Article
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitatsO Nercessian et al
Received 29 August 2003 revised 4 November 2003accepted 4 November 2003 For correspondence E-mailjeanthonuniv-brestfr Tel (+33) 298 498 751 Fax (+33) 298 498705
dagger
Present address Department of Chemical Engineering Box352125 University of Washington Seattle WA 98195 USA E-mailnerceouwashingtonedu
Design of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for detecting cultured and uncultured archaeal lineages in high-temperature environments
Olivier Nercessian
1dagger
Maria Prokofeva
2
Alexander Lebedinski
2
Steacutephane LrsquoHaridon
1
Craig Cary
3
Daniel Prieur
1
and Christian Jeanthon
1
1
UMR 6539 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Universiteacute de Bretagne Occidentale Institut Universitaire Europeacuteen de la Mer Technopole Brest-Iroise Place Nicolas Copernic 29280 Plouzaneacute France
2
Institute of Microbiology Russian Academy of Sciences Prospect 60 Let Oktyabrya 72 117811 Moscow Russia
3
University of Delaware College of Marine Studies 700 Pilottown Road Lewes DE 19958 USA
Summary
In order to facilitate the evaluation of archaeal com-munity diversity and distribution in high-temperatureenvironments 14 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probeswere designed Adequate hybridization and washconditions of the probes encompassing most knownhyperthermophilic Archaea members of the ordersThermococcales Desulfurococcales and Sulfolo-bales of the families MethanocaldococcaceaePyrodictiaceae and Thermoproteaceae of the genera
Archaeoglobus
Methanopyrus
and
Ignicoccus
andof the as yet uncultured lineages Korarchaeota Cre-narchaeota marine group I deep-sea hydrothermalvent euryarchaeotic group 2 (DHVE 2) and deep-seahydrothermal vent euryarchaeotic group 8 (DHVE 8)were determined by dot-blot hybridization from targetand non-target reference organisms and environmen-tal clones The oligonucleotide probes were also usedto evaluate the archaeal community composition innine deep-sea hydrothermal vent samples All probesexcept those targeting members of SulfolobalesThermoproteaceae Pyrodictiaceae and Korarchaeotagave positive hybridization signals when hybridizedagainst 16S rDNA amplification products obtainedfrom hydrothermal DNA extracts The results con-
firmed the widespread occurrence of Thermococ-cales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal ventsand extended the known ecological habitats ofuncultured lineages Despite their wide coverage theprobes were unable to resolve the archaeal commu-nities associated with hydrothermally influenced sed-iments suggesting that these samples may containnovel lineages This suite of oligonucleotide probesmay represent an efficient tool for rapid qualitativeand quantitative characterization of archaeal commu-nities Their application would help to provide newinsights in the future into the composition distribu-tion and abundance of Archaea in high-temperatureenvironments
Introduction
Analysis of archaeal 16S rRNA sequences has enabledthe phylogeny of Archaea to be described and majorgroups to be identified (Woese
et al
1990 Hugenholtz2002) So far composed of 12 recognized orders 69 gen-era and more than 210 characterized species Archaeaare divided into two phyla (Garrity and Holt 2001) Thephylum Euryarchaeota consists of extreme halophilesthermoacidophiles methanogens hyperthermophilic sul-phate andor sulphite reducers and sulphur metabolizersThe phylum Crenarchaeota is primarily composed ofhyperthermophiles most of which are able to metabolizesulphur (Garrity and Holt 2001)
With the advent of modern molecular biological tech-niques the diversity and widespread distribution of Eur-yarchaeota and Crenarchaeota in previously unsuspectedhabitats have been recognized (DeLong 1992 Bintrim
et al
1997 Vetriani
et al
1999 Takai
et al
2001a) Athird archaeal phylum Korarchaeota has been postulatedon the basis of environmental 16S rRNA sequencesretrieved from microbial communities from the YellowstonePark (Barns
et al
1996) However as no representativesof this group have been isolated in pure culture the phy-lum status of this lineage cannot currently be assessed
Assessment of microbial diversity in diverse high-temperature environments has led to the discovery ofmetabolically diverse Archaea that are thought to contrib-
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats
171
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Environmental Microbiology
6
170ndash182
ute significantly to the biogeochemical cycles within thesehabitats (Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Orphan
et al
2000Takai
et al
2001b) The analysis of 16S rRNA genes ofhydrothermal vent microbial communities revealed a widediversity of sequences with no close relatives in culture(Barns
et al
1996 Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Takai andSako 1999 Reysenbach
et al
2000 Huber
et al
2002Nercessian
et al
2003) Owing to the lack of determina-tive molecular tools the qualitative and quantitative deter-mination of archaeal assemblages in high-temperatureenvironments still remains poorly assessed In this studywe report on the development of a suite of 14 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for different archaeal phy-logenetic levels of cultured and uncultured organismsretrieved from deep-sea hydrothermal systems (Takai andHorikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbach
et al
2000 Huber
et al
2002 Teske
et al
2002Nercessian
et al
2003) In the context of a preliminaryapplication we analysed the composition of archaealcommunities associated with diverse deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples
Results and discussion
Probe design
The design of oligonucleotide probes was based on com-parative analysis of 11 143 complete and partial 16 rRNAsequences of the
ARB
database using the
PROBE
DESIGN
option of the
ARB
package In addition to automatic designof probes alignments of 16S rRNA sequences werescreened to find signatures that allow the distinction oforders families and genera of cultured archaeal thermo-philes as well as currently uncultured lineages of Archaeaknown to thrive in hydrothermal ecosystems (Takai andHorikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbach
et al
2000 Takai
et al
2001b Huber
et al
2002 Ner-cessian
et al
2003) Oligonucleotide probes specific toArchaea and Korarchaeota have been designed overrecent years (Stahl and Amann 1991 Burggraf
et al
1997) However the screening of the GenBank RDP andARB databases revealed that several recently deposited16S rRNA sequences retrieved from hydrothermal envi-ronments were not targeted by the existing probes (S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 S--Kor-0546-a-A-20 S--Kor-0604-a-A-20 S--Kor-1135-a-A-20) justifying the development ofupdated probes
Probes encompassing thermophilic cultured Archaea
Three order- three family- and three genus-level probeswere designed to target most of the thermophilic Archaea(Table 1) The sequence of S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 perfectlymatched the sequences of all members of the order Ther-mococcales (group 2 in Fig 1) that includes chemoorga-
noheterotrophic hyperthermophiles and encompasses thegenera
Thermococcus
Pyrococcus
and
Palaeococcus
(Takai
et al
2000 Boone
et al
2001) The probe S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 perfectly matched the sequences of allthermoacidophilic chemoorganotrophs of the order Sul-folobales (group 11 in Fig 1) (Boone
et al
2001) Theprobe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 was designed to targetrepresentatives of the order Desulfurococcales thatencompass chemoorganoheterotrophic and chemolitho-autotrophic hyperthermophiles (group 8 in Fig 1) (Boone
et al
2001) It exhibited perfect matches with all Desulfu-rococcales sequences except those of species of thegenus
Desulfurococcus
[one GA mismatch at position747 (
Escherichia coli
numbering Brosius
et al
1978)]This probe was also found to match perfectly somesequences that are not affiliated with the order Desulfu-rococcales such as species of the genera
Thermocladium
and
Vulcanisaeta
(Boone
et al
2001) and the environ-mental clone pJP89 (Barns
et al
1994) The probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 was however retained for furtherexperiments because of the potential utility of its widecoverage
Three family- (S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 and S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20) and three genus-levelprobes (S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 andS-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21) were designed to target most of16S rRNA sequences of the Pyrodictiaceae Thermopro-teaceae and Methanocaldococcaceae
Methanopyrus
Ignicoccus
and
Archaeoglobus
respectively The probe S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9 in Fig 1) perfectly matchedsequences of all species of the family Pyrodictiaceaecomposed of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophs orfermenters (Boone
et al
2001) Despite several attemptswe were unable to design a probe that targeted all mem-bers of the order Thermoproteales (group 12 in Fig 1)(Boone
et al
2001) with a T
m
lower than 76
infin
C andwithout altering the
in silico
specificity We thereforedesigned probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 that perfectlymatched all 16S rRNA sequences of the genera
Pyro-baculum
Thermoproteus
Caldivirga
and
Vulcanisaeta
known as thermoacidophilic chemoorganoheterotrophsusing sulphur O
2
or nitrate as electron acceptors (Boone
et al
2001 Itoh
et al
2002) However it had one mis-match with the sequences of members of genera
Ther-mocladium
(CT at position 1244
E coli
numbering) and
Thermofilum
(CA at position 1225
E coli
numbering)Contrary to the probe MCC1109 developed by Raskin
et al
(1994) the degenerate probe S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20perfectly matched the sequences of all hyperthermophilicmethanogenic species of the family Methanocaldococ-caceae (genera
Methanocaldococcus
and
Methanotorris
)(group 4 in Fig 1) (Boone
et al
2001)
It contained aslightly destabilizing GT mismatch at position 1121 (
Ecoli
numbering) with sequences of thermophilic and
172
O Nercessian
et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Environmental Microbiology
6
170ndash182
Tab
le 1
Olig
onuc
leot
ide
prob
es ta
rget
ing
16S
rD
NA
seq
uenc
es o
f the
rmop
hilic
hyp
erth
erm
ophi
lic a
nd u
ncul
ture
d A
rcha
ea
Pro
be n
ame
a
Pro
be s
eque
nce
(5
cent AElig
3
cent
)
b
Spe
cific
ity (
num
ber
of e
xact
mat
ches
in G
enB
ank)
c
The
oret
ical
Td
(
infin
C)
d
Hyb
te
mp
(
infin
C)
e
Was
h
tem
p (
infin
C)
f
Ref
eren
ces
S-D
-Arc
h-09
15-b
-A-1
7C
TC
CC
CC
GC
CA
ATT
CC
TA
rcha
ea56
47
47M
odifi
ed f
rom
Sta
hlan
d A
man
n (1
991)
S-O
-Tcl
-140
8-a-
A-1
8A
CG
CT
CC
AC
CC
CT
TG
TAG
The
rmoc
occa
les
(121
)58
4754
Thi
s st
udy
S-G
-Agb
-043
1-a-
A-2
1T
TTA
GG
CA
CC
CC
GA
CA
GC
CC
G
Arc
haeo
glob
us
(15
)70
4752
Thi
s st
udy
S-F
-Mcc
-110
9-b-
A-2
0G
CA
AC
ATG
GG
GC
RC
GG
GT
CT
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cace
ae (
15)
66 (
68)
4758
g
Mod
ified
from
Ras
kin
et a
l
(19
94)
S-
-DH
VE
2-03
92-a
-A-2
0A
AG
GG
CA
CT
CG
GG
CT
CC
CC
TD
HV
E 2
(18
)64
4758
Thi
s st
udy
S-
-DH
VE
8-13
58-a
-A-1
9AT
TC
GC
CG
AA
CG
GT
GC
TAA
DH
VE
8 (
9)56
4752
Thi
s st
udy
S-G
-Mp-
0431
-a-A
-20
TTA
CA
CC
CC
GG
TAC
AG
CC
GC
Met
hano
pyru
s
(7)
6647
52T
his
stud
yS
-O-D
sfc-
0736
-a-A
-21
CC
GT
CG
GG
CG
CG
TT
CC
AG
CC
GM
ost
of D
esul
furo
cocc
ales
(60
+ 7
The
rmop
rote
ales
)76
5070
Thi
s st
udy
S-F
-Prd
-048
8-a-
A-1
6C
CG
CT
TAC
TC
CC
CC
GC
Pyr
odic
tiace
ae (
7 +
1 m
amm
als)
5647
52T
his
stud
yS
-G-I
gn-0
463-
a-A
-16
AC
CC
CC
GC
CT
GT
TTA
C
Igni
cocc
us
(11
+ 4
mam
mal
s)52
4747
Thi
s st
udy
S-O
-Sul
f-10
45-a
-A-1
8A
CC
TC
CT
CT
CC
GC
GA
GT
CS
ulfo
loba
les
(50)
6047
54T
his
stud
yS
-F-T
hp-1
225-
a-A
-22
CC
CG
CC
ATT
GC
AG
CT
CG
CG
TG
CT
herm
opro
teac
eae
exce
pt
The
rmoc
ladi
um
(23
)76
5065
Thi
s st
udy
S-
-MgI
-039
1-b-
A-2
0A
AAT
CA
CT
CG
GAT
TAA
CC
TT
Mos
t of
mar
ine
Cre
narc
haeo
ta g
roup
I (
127)
5447
47M
odifi
ed f
rom
Tak
aian
d H
orik
oshi
(1
999)
S-
-Kor
-055
4-a-
A-1
8A
GG
CC
CA
GTA
TG
CG
TG
GG
Kor
arch
aeot
a (1
2)60
4752
Thi
s st
udy
a
Arc
h A
rcha
ea T
cl T
herm
ococ
cale
s A
gb
Arc
haeo
glob
us
Mcc
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cace
ae D
HV
E 2
dee
p-se
a hy
drot
herm
al v
ent e
urya
rcha
eotic
gro
up 2
DH
VE
8 d
eep-
sea
hydr
othe
rmal
ven
teu
ryar
chae
otic
gro
up 8
Mp
Met
hano
pyru
s
Dsf
c D
esul
furo
cocc
ales
Prd
P
yrod
ictia
ceae
Ign
Igni
cocc
us
Sul
f S
ulfo
loba
les
Thp
The
rmop
rote
acea
e ex
cept
The
rmoc
ladi
um
MgI
m
arin
e gr
oup
I K
or
Kor
arch
aeot
a P
robe
nam
es a
re a
ccor
ding
to
the
Olig
onuc
leot
ide
Pro
be D
atab
ase
nom
encl
atur
e (A
lm
et a
l
19
96)
b
R r
efer
s to
A o
r G
c
See
Fig
1 f
or d
etai
led
cove
rage
info
rmat
ion
BLA
ST
sea
rche
s pe
rform
ed in
Mar
ch 2
003
d
The
oret
ical
tem
pera
ture
of
dena
tura
tion
(Td)
cal
cula
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
form
ula
4
yen
(A
+ T
) +
2
yen
(G
+C
) (S
tahl
and
Am
ann
199
1) F
or t
he p
robe
S-F
-Mcc
-110
9-b-
A-2
0 it
dep
ends
whe
ther
R is
con
side
red
as a
n A
(66
infin
C)
or a
G (
68
infin
C)
e
Hyb
ridiz
atio
n te
mpe
ratu
re (
infin
C)
used
in t
he s
peci
ficity
stu
dies
f
Tem
pera
ture
(
infin
C)
of t
he w
ash
buffe
r us
ed in
the
spe
cific
ity s
tudi
es
g
Pro
be S
-F-M
cc-1
109-
b-A
-20
was
spe
cific
for
16S
rR
NA
of
the
gene
ra M
etha
noto
rris
and
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cus
whe
n w
ashe
d at
58infin
C T
he p
robe
was
spe
cific
for
16S
rR
NA
of
the
gene
raM
etha
noto
rris
M
etha
noca
ldoc
occu
s M
etha
noco
ccus
and
Met
hano
ther
moc
occu
s w
hen
was
hed
at 5
6infinC
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 173
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
mesophilic methanogenic species of the genera Methan-othermococcus and Methanococcus respectively Theprobes S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 and S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16(groups 7 and 10 in Fig 1 respectively) perfectly boundall sequences of the genera Methanopyrus and Ignicoc-cus (Boone et al 2001) Contrary to other members ofthe order Desulfurococcales species of Ignicoccus areobligate chemolithoautotrophic sulphur reducers (Booneet al 2001) With the hyperthermophilic methanogensthese organisms probably represent the main primaryproducers in high-temperature marine environmentsThe probe S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 perfectly matched allsequences of the hyperthermophilic mixotrophic sulphate-or sulphite- and thiosulphate-reducing organisms of thegenus Archaeoglobus and environmental clones (ieVC21 Arc8 VC21Arc4 and pEPR796) retrieved fromdeep-sea hydrothermal vents (Reysenbach et al 2000Boone et al 2001 Nercessian et al 2003) (group 3 inFig 1) However it contained major mismatches withsequences of species of genera Ferroglobus (AA at posi-tion 444 E coli numbering) and Geoglobus and withenvironmental clones VC21 Arc2 (CA at position 434 Ecoli numbering) VC21Arc36 (AA at position 444 E colinumbering) and pMC2A228 (CC at position 440 E colinumbering) retrieved from deep-sea hydrothermal vents(Hafenbradl et al 1996 Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Rey-senbach et al 2000 Kashefi et al 2002)
Probes encompassing uncultured organisms
In addition to probes targeting cultured Archaea wedeveloped four oligonucleotide probes specific to as yetuncultured organisms With the exception of marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) these uncultured organismshave only been detected in hydrothermal systems (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbachet al 2000 Marteinsson et al 2001 Takai et al 2001bHuber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) The probeS--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5 in Fig 1) matched per-fectly all sequences belonging to the deep-sea hydrother-mal vent euryarchaeotic group 2 (DHVE 2 Takai andHorikoshi 1999) The probe S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19(group 6 in Fig 1) matched perfectly all sequences fromthe recently discovered environmental clade deep-seahydrothermal vent euryarchaeotic group 8 (DHVE 8 Takaiand Horikoshi 1999) Burggraf et al (1997) designedprobes specific to the Korarchaeota (Barns et al 1996)However recently deposited lsquokorarchaealrsquo 16S rRNAsequences retrieved from coastal and deep-sea hydro-thermal vents contained several mismatches with thelatter probes We therefore designed the probe S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 to encompass most of the 16S rRNA
sequences of Korarchaeota available in the databases(group 14 in Fig 1) The probe S--MgI-0391-b-A-20matched most sequences belonging to the marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) However some sequences con-tained a slightly destabilizing TG mismatch at positions398 or 407 (E coli numbering)
Finally a new general archaeal probe was developed inorder to include the new archaeal lineage DHVE8 (Ner-cessian et al 2003) (group 1 in Fig 1) In contrast to theArchaea-specific probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 developedby Stahl and Amann (1991) the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 (group 1 in Fig 1) perfectly matched the 16S rRNAfrom the DHVE8 lineage However similar to the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 the new probe still contained severalstrongly destabilizing mismatches with some DHVE2 (CAat position 928) and all Korarchaeota sequences (CA andTG at positions 923 and 930)
Specificity studies
The specificity of selected oligonucleotide sequencesrevealed by comparison with available rRNA sequencedatabases was ensured by optimization of experimentalhybridization conditions The hybridization and post-hybridization washing temperatures ensuring specificitywere experimentally determined for the 14 probes char-acterized in this study (Table 1) The 14 identical mem-branes containing nucleic acids from the reference strainsand environmental clones mentioned in Table 2 are shownin Fig 2 Dot-blot hybridization experiments generallyconfirmed the in silico specificity analysis Probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave positive signals for most of thearchaeal nucleic acids Confirming the in silico analysisno hybridization signals were obtained for clonespEPR193 pEPR152 and pEPR153 (Fig 2a blots C4 G2and G3 respectively) that belonged to the lineagesDHVE2 or Korarchaeota The organisms targeted byprobes S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (Fig 2b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (Fig 2c) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (Fig 2e)S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (Fig 2f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20(Fig 2g) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2i) S-F-Prd-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (Fig 2k) andS--MgI-0391-a-A-20 (Fig 2m) were unambiguouslydiscriminated from non-target strains The probe S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 was found to be specific for mesophilic ther-mophilic and hyperthermophilic methanogens from theorder Methanococcales when washed at 56infinC (data notshown) It was specific for hyperthermophilic methano-gens only when washed at 58infinC (Fig 2d) This differencein specificity resulted from a slightly destabilizing GT mis-match at position 1121 (E coli numbering) in the se-quences of Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus
174 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 175
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Methanococcus voltae Under the conditions usedthe probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 was specific for membersof the families Thermoproteaceae and ThermofiliaceaeHowever lower signal intensities probably due to thepresence of a single weakly destabilizing mismatch were
observed for Thermocladium (family Thermoproteaceae)and Thermofilum (family Thermofiliaceae) (Fig 2l) Ourexperimental conditions confirmed that probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16 matched perfectly nearly all sequences ofthe order Desulfurococcales and some of the order Ther-
Table 2 Reference strains and environmental clones used in this study
Reference strains or clonesa Position on blotb Reference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (DSM 2661T) A1 Jones et al (1983)Methanotorris igneus (DSM 5666T) A2 Burggraf et al (1990a)Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (DSM 2095T) A3 Huber et al (1982)Methanococcus voltae (DSM 1537T) A4 Balch et al (1979)Thermococcus celer (DSM 2476T) A5 Zillig et al (1983b)Pyrococcus abyssi strain GE5 A6 Erauso et al (1993)Archaeoglobus profundus (DSM 5631T) A7 Burggraf et al (1990b)Methanopyrus kandleri (DSM 6324T) B1 Kurr et al (1991)Methanoculleus marisnigri (DSM 1498T) B2 Romesser et al (1979)Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T) B3 Paterek and Smith (1985)pEPR809 (Methanocaldococcus spp) B4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR743 (Thermococcus spp) B5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR145 (Pyrococcus spp) B6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR796 (Archaeoglobus spp) B7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR829 (Methanopyrus spp) C1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR717 (DHVE 2) C2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR719 (DHVE 2) C3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR193 (DHVE 2) C4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR824 (DHVE 8) C5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR895 (DHVE 8) C6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR731 (DHVE 8) C7 Nercessian et al (2003)Pyrodictium abyssi (DSM 6158T) D1 Pley et al (1991)Pyrolobus fumari (DSM 11204T) D2 Blochl et al (1997)Ignicoccus pacificus (DSM 13166T) D3 Huber et al (2000)Staphylothermus marinus (DSM 3639T) D4 Fiala et al (1986)Aeropyrum pernix (DSM 11879T) D5 Sako et al (1996)Thermococcus profundus (JCM 9378T) D6 Kobayashi et al (1994)Desulfurococcus mobilis (DSM 2161T) D7 Zillig et al (1982)Acidilobus aceticus (DSM 11585T) E1 Prokofeva et al (2000)Sulfolobus shibatae (DSM 5389T) E2 Grogan et al (1990)Metallosphaera sedula (DSM 5348T) E3 Huber et al (1989)Acidianus brierleyi (DSM 1651T) E4 Zillig et al (1980)Thermoproteus tenax (DSM 2078T) E5 Zillig et al (1981)Thermocladium modestius (JCM 0088T) E6 Itoh et al (1998)Thermofilum pendens (DSM 2475T) E7 Zillig et al (1983a)Pyrobaculum organotrophum (DSM 4185T) F1 Huber et al (1987)pEPR940 (Pyrodictium spp) F2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR936 (Ignicoccus spp) F3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR805 (Staphylothermus spp) F4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR985 (Aeropyrum spp) F5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR853 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR624 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR161 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) G1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR152 (Korarchaeota) G2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR153 (Korarchaeota) G3 Nercessian et al (2003)Desulfovibrio giganteus (DSM 4123T) G4 Esnault et al (1988)
a Collection numbers of species or phylogenetic relatives of environmental clones pEPR are indicated in brackets DSM Deutsche Sammlungvon Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig Germany) JCM Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (Saitama Japan)b See Fig 2 For example 16S rDNA of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is located on dot A1 (lane A column 1 in Fig 2)
Fig 1 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree showing the archaeal groups targeted by the newly designed probes The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and the correction of Jukes and Cantor (1969) Archaeal lineages marked group 1 to group 14 were targeted by the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (group 1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (group 2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (group 3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (group 4) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (group 6) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (group7) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (group 8) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (group 10) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (group 11) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (group 12) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (group 13) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (group 14) Bold sequences were used in the specificity studies (see Table 2 and Fig 2)
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats
171
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Environmental Microbiology
6
170ndash182
ute significantly to the biogeochemical cycles within thesehabitats (Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Orphan
et al
2000Takai
et al
2001b) The analysis of 16S rRNA genes ofhydrothermal vent microbial communities revealed a widediversity of sequences with no close relatives in culture(Barns
et al
1996 Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Takai andSako 1999 Reysenbach
et al
2000 Huber
et al
2002Nercessian
et al
2003) Owing to the lack of determina-tive molecular tools the qualitative and quantitative deter-mination of archaeal assemblages in high-temperatureenvironments still remains poorly assessed In this studywe report on the development of a suite of 14 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for different archaeal phy-logenetic levels of cultured and uncultured organismsretrieved from deep-sea hydrothermal systems (Takai andHorikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbach
et al
2000 Huber
et al
2002 Teske
et al
2002Nercessian
et al
2003) In the context of a preliminaryapplication we analysed the composition of archaealcommunities associated with diverse deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples
Results and discussion
Probe design
The design of oligonucleotide probes was based on com-parative analysis of 11 143 complete and partial 16 rRNAsequences of the
ARB
database using the
PROBE
DESIGN
option of the
ARB
package In addition to automatic designof probes alignments of 16S rRNA sequences werescreened to find signatures that allow the distinction oforders families and genera of cultured archaeal thermo-philes as well as currently uncultured lineages of Archaeaknown to thrive in hydrothermal ecosystems (Takai andHorikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbach
et al
2000 Takai
et al
2001b Huber
et al
2002 Ner-cessian
et al
2003) Oligonucleotide probes specific toArchaea and Korarchaeota have been designed overrecent years (Stahl and Amann 1991 Burggraf
et al
1997) However the screening of the GenBank RDP andARB databases revealed that several recently deposited16S rRNA sequences retrieved from hydrothermal envi-ronments were not targeted by the existing probes (S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 S--Kor-0546-a-A-20 S--Kor-0604-a-A-20 S--Kor-1135-a-A-20) justifying the development ofupdated probes
Probes encompassing thermophilic cultured Archaea
Three order- three family- and three genus-level probeswere designed to target most of the thermophilic Archaea(Table 1) The sequence of S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 perfectlymatched the sequences of all members of the order Ther-mococcales (group 2 in Fig 1) that includes chemoorga-
noheterotrophic hyperthermophiles and encompasses thegenera
Thermococcus
Pyrococcus
and
Palaeococcus
(Takai
et al
2000 Boone
et al
2001) The probe S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 perfectly matched the sequences of allthermoacidophilic chemoorganotrophs of the order Sul-folobales (group 11 in Fig 1) (Boone
et al
2001) Theprobe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 was designed to targetrepresentatives of the order Desulfurococcales thatencompass chemoorganoheterotrophic and chemolitho-autotrophic hyperthermophiles (group 8 in Fig 1) (Boone
et al
2001) It exhibited perfect matches with all Desulfu-rococcales sequences except those of species of thegenus
Desulfurococcus
[one GA mismatch at position747 (
Escherichia coli
numbering Brosius
et al
1978)]This probe was also found to match perfectly somesequences that are not affiliated with the order Desulfu-rococcales such as species of the genera
Thermocladium
and
Vulcanisaeta
(Boone
et al
2001) and the environ-mental clone pJP89 (Barns
et al
1994) The probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 was however retained for furtherexperiments because of the potential utility of its widecoverage
Three family- (S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 and S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20) and three genus-levelprobes (S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 andS-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21) were designed to target most of16S rRNA sequences of the Pyrodictiaceae Thermopro-teaceae and Methanocaldococcaceae
Methanopyrus
Ignicoccus
and
Archaeoglobus
respectively The probe S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9 in Fig 1) perfectly matchedsequences of all species of the family Pyrodictiaceaecomposed of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophs orfermenters (Boone
et al
2001) Despite several attemptswe were unable to design a probe that targeted all mem-bers of the order Thermoproteales (group 12 in Fig 1)(Boone
et al
2001) with a T
m
lower than 76
infin
C andwithout altering the
in silico
specificity We thereforedesigned probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 that perfectlymatched all 16S rRNA sequences of the genera
Pyro-baculum
Thermoproteus
Caldivirga
and
Vulcanisaeta
known as thermoacidophilic chemoorganoheterotrophsusing sulphur O
2
or nitrate as electron acceptors (Boone
et al
2001 Itoh
et al
2002) However it had one mis-match with the sequences of members of genera
Ther-mocladium
(CT at position 1244
E coli
numbering) and
Thermofilum
(CA at position 1225
E coli
numbering)Contrary to the probe MCC1109 developed by Raskin
et al
(1994) the degenerate probe S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20perfectly matched the sequences of all hyperthermophilicmethanogenic species of the family Methanocaldococ-caceae (genera
Methanocaldococcus
and
Methanotorris
)(group 4 in Fig 1) (Boone
et al
2001)
It contained aslightly destabilizing GT mismatch at position 1121 (
Ecoli
numbering) with sequences of thermophilic and
172
O Nercessian
et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Environmental Microbiology
6
170ndash182
Tab
le 1
Olig
onuc
leot
ide
prob
es ta
rget
ing
16S
rD
NA
seq
uenc
es o
f the
rmop
hilic
hyp
erth
erm
ophi
lic a
nd u
ncul
ture
d A
rcha
ea
Pro
be n
ame
a
Pro
be s
eque
nce
(5
cent AElig
3
cent
)
b
Spe
cific
ity (
num
ber
of e
xact
mat
ches
in G
enB
ank)
c
The
oret
ical
Td
(
infin
C)
d
Hyb
te
mp
(
infin
C)
e
Was
h
tem
p (
infin
C)
f
Ref
eren
ces
S-D
-Arc
h-09
15-b
-A-1
7C
TC
CC
CC
GC
CA
ATT
CC
TA
rcha
ea56
47
47M
odifi
ed f
rom
Sta
hlan
d A
man
n (1
991)
S-O
-Tcl
-140
8-a-
A-1
8A
CG
CT
CC
AC
CC
CT
TG
TAG
The
rmoc
occa
les
(121
)58
4754
Thi
s st
udy
S-G
-Agb
-043
1-a-
A-2
1T
TTA
GG
CA
CC
CC
GA
CA
GC
CC
G
Arc
haeo
glob
us
(15
)70
4752
Thi
s st
udy
S-F
-Mcc
-110
9-b-
A-2
0G
CA
AC
ATG
GG
GC
RC
GG
GT
CT
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cace
ae (
15)
66 (
68)
4758
g
Mod
ified
from
Ras
kin
et a
l
(19
94)
S-
-DH
VE
2-03
92-a
-A-2
0A
AG
GG
CA
CT
CG
GG
CT
CC
CC
TD
HV
E 2
(18
)64
4758
Thi
s st
udy
S-
-DH
VE
8-13
58-a
-A-1
9AT
TC
GC
CG
AA
CG
GT
GC
TAA
DH
VE
8 (
9)56
4752
Thi
s st
udy
S-G
-Mp-
0431
-a-A
-20
TTA
CA
CC
CC
GG
TAC
AG
CC
GC
Met
hano
pyru
s
(7)
6647
52T
his
stud
yS
-O-D
sfc-
0736
-a-A
-21
CC
GT
CG
GG
CG
CG
TT
CC
AG
CC
GM
ost
of D
esul
furo
cocc
ales
(60
+ 7
The
rmop
rote
ales
)76
5070
Thi
s st
udy
S-F
-Prd
-048
8-a-
A-1
6C
CG
CT
TAC
TC
CC
CC
GC
Pyr
odic
tiace
ae (
7 +
1 m
amm
als)
5647
52T
his
stud
yS
-G-I
gn-0
463-
a-A
-16
AC
CC
CC
GC
CT
GT
TTA
C
Igni
cocc
us
(11
+ 4
mam
mal
s)52
4747
Thi
s st
udy
S-O
-Sul
f-10
45-a
-A-1
8A
CC
TC
CT
CT
CC
GC
GA
GT
CS
ulfo
loba
les
(50)
6047
54T
his
stud
yS
-F-T
hp-1
225-
a-A
-22
CC
CG
CC
ATT
GC
AG
CT
CG
CG
TG
CT
herm
opro
teac
eae
exce
pt
The
rmoc
ladi
um
(23
)76
5065
Thi
s st
udy
S-
-MgI
-039
1-b-
A-2
0A
AAT
CA
CT
CG
GAT
TAA
CC
TT
Mos
t of
mar
ine
Cre
narc
haeo
ta g
roup
I (
127)
5447
47M
odifi
ed f
rom
Tak
aian
d H
orik
oshi
(1
999)
S-
-Kor
-055
4-a-
A-1
8A
GG
CC
CA
GTA
TG
CG
TG
GG
Kor
arch
aeot
a (1
2)60
4752
Thi
s st
udy
a
Arc
h A
rcha
ea T
cl T
herm
ococ
cale
s A
gb
Arc
haeo
glob
us
Mcc
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cace
ae D
HV
E 2
dee
p-se
a hy
drot
herm
al v
ent e
urya
rcha
eotic
gro
up 2
DH
VE
8 d
eep-
sea
hydr
othe
rmal
ven
teu
ryar
chae
otic
gro
up 8
Mp
Met
hano
pyru
s
Dsf
c D
esul
furo
cocc
ales
Prd
P
yrod
ictia
ceae
Ign
Igni
cocc
us
Sul
f S
ulfo
loba
les
Thp
The
rmop
rote
acea
e ex
cept
The
rmoc
ladi
um
MgI
m
arin
e gr
oup
I K
or
Kor
arch
aeot
a P
robe
nam
es a
re a
ccor
ding
to
the
Olig
onuc
leot
ide
Pro
be D
atab
ase
nom
encl
atur
e (A
lm
et a
l
19
96)
b
R r
efer
s to
A o
r G
c
See
Fig
1 f
or d
etai
led
cove
rage
info
rmat
ion
BLA
ST
sea
rche
s pe
rform
ed in
Mar
ch 2
003
d
The
oret
ical
tem
pera
ture
of
dena
tura
tion
(Td)
cal
cula
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
form
ula
4
yen
(A
+ T
) +
2
yen
(G
+C
) (S
tahl
and
Am
ann
199
1) F
or t
he p
robe
S-F
-Mcc
-110
9-b-
A-2
0 it
dep
ends
whe
ther
R is
con
side
red
as a
n A
(66
infin
C)
or a
G (
68
infin
C)
e
Hyb
ridiz
atio
n te
mpe
ratu
re (
infin
C)
used
in t
he s
peci
ficity
stu
dies
f
Tem
pera
ture
(
infin
C)
of t
he w
ash
buffe
r us
ed in
the
spe
cific
ity s
tudi
es
g
Pro
be S
-F-M
cc-1
109-
b-A
-20
was
spe
cific
for
16S
rR
NA
of
the
gene
ra M
etha
noto
rris
and
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cus
whe
n w
ashe
d at
58infin
C T
he p
robe
was
spe
cific
for
16S
rR
NA
of
the
gene
raM
etha
noto
rris
M
etha
noca
ldoc
occu
s M
etha
noco
ccus
and
Met
hano
ther
moc
occu
s w
hen
was
hed
at 5
6infinC
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 173
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
mesophilic methanogenic species of the genera Methan-othermococcus and Methanococcus respectively Theprobes S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 and S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16(groups 7 and 10 in Fig 1 respectively) perfectly boundall sequences of the genera Methanopyrus and Ignicoc-cus (Boone et al 2001) Contrary to other members ofthe order Desulfurococcales species of Ignicoccus areobligate chemolithoautotrophic sulphur reducers (Booneet al 2001) With the hyperthermophilic methanogensthese organisms probably represent the main primaryproducers in high-temperature marine environmentsThe probe S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 perfectly matched allsequences of the hyperthermophilic mixotrophic sulphate-or sulphite- and thiosulphate-reducing organisms of thegenus Archaeoglobus and environmental clones (ieVC21 Arc8 VC21Arc4 and pEPR796) retrieved fromdeep-sea hydrothermal vents (Reysenbach et al 2000Boone et al 2001 Nercessian et al 2003) (group 3 inFig 1) However it contained major mismatches withsequences of species of genera Ferroglobus (AA at posi-tion 444 E coli numbering) and Geoglobus and withenvironmental clones VC21 Arc2 (CA at position 434 Ecoli numbering) VC21Arc36 (AA at position 444 E colinumbering) and pMC2A228 (CC at position 440 E colinumbering) retrieved from deep-sea hydrothermal vents(Hafenbradl et al 1996 Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Rey-senbach et al 2000 Kashefi et al 2002)
Probes encompassing uncultured organisms
In addition to probes targeting cultured Archaea wedeveloped four oligonucleotide probes specific to as yetuncultured organisms With the exception of marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) these uncultured organismshave only been detected in hydrothermal systems (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbachet al 2000 Marteinsson et al 2001 Takai et al 2001bHuber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) The probeS--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5 in Fig 1) matched per-fectly all sequences belonging to the deep-sea hydrother-mal vent euryarchaeotic group 2 (DHVE 2 Takai andHorikoshi 1999) The probe S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19(group 6 in Fig 1) matched perfectly all sequences fromthe recently discovered environmental clade deep-seahydrothermal vent euryarchaeotic group 8 (DHVE 8 Takaiand Horikoshi 1999) Burggraf et al (1997) designedprobes specific to the Korarchaeota (Barns et al 1996)However recently deposited lsquokorarchaealrsquo 16S rRNAsequences retrieved from coastal and deep-sea hydro-thermal vents contained several mismatches with thelatter probes We therefore designed the probe S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 to encompass most of the 16S rRNA
sequences of Korarchaeota available in the databases(group 14 in Fig 1) The probe S--MgI-0391-b-A-20matched most sequences belonging to the marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) However some sequences con-tained a slightly destabilizing TG mismatch at positions398 or 407 (E coli numbering)
Finally a new general archaeal probe was developed inorder to include the new archaeal lineage DHVE8 (Ner-cessian et al 2003) (group 1 in Fig 1) In contrast to theArchaea-specific probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 developedby Stahl and Amann (1991) the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 (group 1 in Fig 1) perfectly matched the 16S rRNAfrom the DHVE8 lineage However similar to the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 the new probe still contained severalstrongly destabilizing mismatches with some DHVE2 (CAat position 928) and all Korarchaeota sequences (CA andTG at positions 923 and 930)
Specificity studies
The specificity of selected oligonucleotide sequencesrevealed by comparison with available rRNA sequencedatabases was ensured by optimization of experimentalhybridization conditions The hybridization and post-hybridization washing temperatures ensuring specificitywere experimentally determined for the 14 probes char-acterized in this study (Table 1) The 14 identical mem-branes containing nucleic acids from the reference strainsand environmental clones mentioned in Table 2 are shownin Fig 2 Dot-blot hybridization experiments generallyconfirmed the in silico specificity analysis Probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave positive signals for most of thearchaeal nucleic acids Confirming the in silico analysisno hybridization signals were obtained for clonespEPR193 pEPR152 and pEPR153 (Fig 2a blots C4 G2and G3 respectively) that belonged to the lineagesDHVE2 or Korarchaeota The organisms targeted byprobes S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (Fig 2b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (Fig 2c) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (Fig 2e)S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (Fig 2f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20(Fig 2g) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2i) S-F-Prd-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (Fig 2k) andS--MgI-0391-a-A-20 (Fig 2m) were unambiguouslydiscriminated from non-target strains The probe S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 was found to be specific for mesophilic ther-mophilic and hyperthermophilic methanogens from theorder Methanococcales when washed at 56infinC (data notshown) It was specific for hyperthermophilic methano-gens only when washed at 58infinC (Fig 2d) This differencein specificity resulted from a slightly destabilizing GT mis-match at position 1121 (E coli numbering) in the se-quences of Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus
174 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 175
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Methanococcus voltae Under the conditions usedthe probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 was specific for membersof the families Thermoproteaceae and ThermofiliaceaeHowever lower signal intensities probably due to thepresence of a single weakly destabilizing mismatch were
observed for Thermocladium (family Thermoproteaceae)and Thermofilum (family Thermofiliaceae) (Fig 2l) Ourexperimental conditions confirmed that probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16 matched perfectly nearly all sequences ofthe order Desulfurococcales and some of the order Ther-
Table 2 Reference strains and environmental clones used in this study
Reference strains or clonesa Position on blotb Reference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (DSM 2661T) A1 Jones et al (1983)Methanotorris igneus (DSM 5666T) A2 Burggraf et al (1990a)Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (DSM 2095T) A3 Huber et al (1982)Methanococcus voltae (DSM 1537T) A4 Balch et al (1979)Thermococcus celer (DSM 2476T) A5 Zillig et al (1983b)Pyrococcus abyssi strain GE5 A6 Erauso et al (1993)Archaeoglobus profundus (DSM 5631T) A7 Burggraf et al (1990b)Methanopyrus kandleri (DSM 6324T) B1 Kurr et al (1991)Methanoculleus marisnigri (DSM 1498T) B2 Romesser et al (1979)Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T) B3 Paterek and Smith (1985)pEPR809 (Methanocaldococcus spp) B4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR743 (Thermococcus spp) B5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR145 (Pyrococcus spp) B6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR796 (Archaeoglobus spp) B7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR829 (Methanopyrus spp) C1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR717 (DHVE 2) C2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR719 (DHVE 2) C3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR193 (DHVE 2) C4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR824 (DHVE 8) C5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR895 (DHVE 8) C6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR731 (DHVE 8) C7 Nercessian et al (2003)Pyrodictium abyssi (DSM 6158T) D1 Pley et al (1991)Pyrolobus fumari (DSM 11204T) D2 Blochl et al (1997)Ignicoccus pacificus (DSM 13166T) D3 Huber et al (2000)Staphylothermus marinus (DSM 3639T) D4 Fiala et al (1986)Aeropyrum pernix (DSM 11879T) D5 Sako et al (1996)Thermococcus profundus (JCM 9378T) D6 Kobayashi et al (1994)Desulfurococcus mobilis (DSM 2161T) D7 Zillig et al (1982)Acidilobus aceticus (DSM 11585T) E1 Prokofeva et al (2000)Sulfolobus shibatae (DSM 5389T) E2 Grogan et al (1990)Metallosphaera sedula (DSM 5348T) E3 Huber et al (1989)Acidianus brierleyi (DSM 1651T) E4 Zillig et al (1980)Thermoproteus tenax (DSM 2078T) E5 Zillig et al (1981)Thermocladium modestius (JCM 0088T) E6 Itoh et al (1998)Thermofilum pendens (DSM 2475T) E7 Zillig et al (1983a)Pyrobaculum organotrophum (DSM 4185T) F1 Huber et al (1987)pEPR940 (Pyrodictium spp) F2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR936 (Ignicoccus spp) F3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR805 (Staphylothermus spp) F4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR985 (Aeropyrum spp) F5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR853 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR624 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR161 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) G1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR152 (Korarchaeota) G2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR153 (Korarchaeota) G3 Nercessian et al (2003)Desulfovibrio giganteus (DSM 4123T) G4 Esnault et al (1988)
a Collection numbers of species or phylogenetic relatives of environmental clones pEPR are indicated in brackets DSM Deutsche Sammlungvon Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig Germany) JCM Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (Saitama Japan)b See Fig 2 For example 16S rDNA of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is located on dot A1 (lane A column 1 in Fig 2)
Fig 1 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree showing the archaeal groups targeted by the newly designed probes The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and the correction of Jukes and Cantor (1969) Archaeal lineages marked group 1 to group 14 were targeted by the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (group 1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (group 2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (group 3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (group 4) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (group 6) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (group7) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (group 8) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (group 10) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (group 11) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (group 12) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (group 13) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (group 14) Bold sequences were used in the specificity studies (see Table 2 and Fig 2)
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
172
O Nercessian
et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Environmental Microbiology
6
170ndash182
Tab
le 1
Olig
onuc
leot
ide
prob
es ta
rget
ing
16S
rD
NA
seq
uenc
es o
f the
rmop
hilic
hyp
erth
erm
ophi
lic a
nd u
ncul
ture
d A
rcha
ea
Pro
be n
ame
a
Pro
be s
eque
nce
(5
cent AElig
3
cent
)
b
Spe
cific
ity (
num
ber
of e
xact
mat
ches
in G
enB
ank)
c
The
oret
ical
Td
(
infin
C)
d
Hyb
te
mp
(
infin
C)
e
Was
h
tem
p (
infin
C)
f
Ref
eren
ces
S-D
-Arc
h-09
15-b
-A-1
7C
TC
CC
CC
GC
CA
ATT
CC
TA
rcha
ea56
47
47M
odifi
ed f
rom
Sta
hlan
d A
man
n (1
991)
S-O
-Tcl
-140
8-a-
A-1
8A
CG
CT
CC
AC
CC
CT
TG
TAG
The
rmoc
occa
les
(121
)58
4754
Thi
s st
udy
S-G
-Agb
-043
1-a-
A-2
1T
TTA
GG
CA
CC
CC
GA
CA
GC
CC
G
Arc
haeo
glob
us
(15
)70
4752
Thi
s st
udy
S-F
-Mcc
-110
9-b-
A-2
0G
CA
AC
ATG
GG
GC
RC
GG
GT
CT
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cace
ae (
15)
66 (
68)
4758
g
Mod
ified
from
Ras
kin
et a
l
(19
94)
S-
-DH
VE
2-03
92-a
-A-2
0A
AG
GG
CA
CT
CG
GG
CT
CC
CC
TD
HV
E 2
(18
)64
4758
Thi
s st
udy
S-
-DH
VE
8-13
58-a
-A-1
9AT
TC
GC
CG
AA
CG
GT
GC
TAA
DH
VE
8 (
9)56
4752
Thi
s st
udy
S-G
-Mp-
0431
-a-A
-20
TTA
CA
CC
CC
GG
TAC
AG
CC
GC
Met
hano
pyru
s
(7)
6647
52T
his
stud
yS
-O-D
sfc-
0736
-a-A
-21
CC
GT
CG
GG
CG
CG
TT
CC
AG
CC
GM
ost
of D
esul
furo
cocc
ales
(60
+ 7
The
rmop
rote
ales
)76
5070
Thi
s st
udy
S-F
-Prd
-048
8-a-
A-1
6C
CG
CT
TAC
TC
CC
CC
GC
Pyr
odic
tiace
ae (
7 +
1 m
amm
als)
5647
52T
his
stud
yS
-G-I
gn-0
463-
a-A
-16
AC
CC
CC
GC
CT
GT
TTA
C
Igni
cocc
us
(11
+ 4
mam
mal
s)52
4747
Thi
s st
udy
S-O
-Sul
f-10
45-a
-A-1
8A
CC
TC
CT
CT
CC
GC
GA
GT
CS
ulfo
loba
les
(50)
6047
54T
his
stud
yS
-F-T
hp-1
225-
a-A
-22
CC
CG
CC
ATT
GC
AG
CT
CG
CG
TG
CT
herm
opro
teac
eae
exce
pt
The
rmoc
ladi
um
(23
)76
5065
Thi
s st
udy
S-
-MgI
-039
1-b-
A-2
0A
AAT
CA
CT
CG
GAT
TAA
CC
TT
Mos
t of
mar
ine
Cre
narc
haeo
ta g
roup
I (
127)
5447
47M
odifi
ed f
rom
Tak
aian
d H
orik
oshi
(1
999)
S-
-Kor
-055
4-a-
A-1
8A
GG
CC
CA
GTA
TG
CG
TG
GG
Kor
arch
aeot
a (1
2)60
4752
Thi
s st
udy
a
Arc
h A
rcha
ea T
cl T
herm
ococ
cale
s A
gb
Arc
haeo
glob
us
Mcc
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cace
ae D
HV
E 2
dee
p-se
a hy
drot
herm
al v
ent e
urya
rcha
eotic
gro
up 2
DH
VE
8 d
eep-
sea
hydr
othe
rmal
ven
teu
ryar
chae
otic
gro
up 8
Mp
Met
hano
pyru
s
Dsf
c D
esul
furo
cocc
ales
Prd
P
yrod
ictia
ceae
Ign
Igni
cocc
us
Sul
f S
ulfo
loba
les
Thp
The
rmop
rote
acea
e ex
cept
The
rmoc
ladi
um
MgI
m
arin
e gr
oup
I K
or
Kor
arch
aeot
a P
robe
nam
es a
re a
ccor
ding
to
the
Olig
onuc
leot
ide
Pro
be D
atab
ase
nom
encl
atur
e (A
lm
et a
l
19
96)
b
R r
efer
s to
A o
r G
c
See
Fig
1 f
or d
etai
led
cove
rage
info
rmat
ion
BLA
ST
sea
rche
s pe
rform
ed in
Mar
ch 2
003
d
The
oret
ical
tem
pera
ture
of
dena
tura
tion
(Td)
cal
cula
ted
acco
rdin
g to
the
form
ula
4
yen
(A
+ T
) +
2
yen
(G
+C
) (S
tahl
and
Am
ann
199
1) F
or t
he p
robe
S-F
-Mcc
-110
9-b-
A-2
0 it
dep
ends
whe
ther
R is
con
side
red
as a
n A
(66
infin
C)
or a
G (
68
infin
C)
e
Hyb
ridiz
atio
n te
mpe
ratu
re (
infin
C)
used
in t
he s
peci
ficity
stu
dies
f
Tem
pera
ture
(
infin
C)
of t
he w
ash
buffe
r us
ed in
the
spe
cific
ity s
tudi
es
g
Pro
be S
-F-M
cc-1
109-
b-A
-20
was
spe
cific
for
16S
rR
NA
of
the
gene
ra M
etha
noto
rris
and
Met
hano
cald
ococ
cus
whe
n w
ashe
d at
58infin
C T
he p
robe
was
spe
cific
for
16S
rR
NA
of
the
gene
raM
etha
noto
rris
M
etha
noca
ldoc
occu
s M
etha
noco
ccus
and
Met
hano
ther
moc
occu
s w
hen
was
hed
at 5
6infinC
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 173
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
mesophilic methanogenic species of the genera Methan-othermococcus and Methanococcus respectively Theprobes S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 and S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16(groups 7 and 10 in Fig 1 respectively) perfectly boundall sequences of the genera Methanopyrus and Ignicoc-cus (Boone et al 2001) Contrary to other members ofthe order Desulfurococcales species of Ignicoccus areobligate chemolithoautotrophic sulphur reducers (Booneet al 2001) With the hyperthermophilic methanogensthese organisms probably represent the main primaryproducers in high-temperature marine environmentsThe probe S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 perfectly matched allsequences of the hyperthermophilic mixotrophic sulphate-or sulphite- and thiosulphate-reducing organisms of thegenus Archaeoglobus and environmental clones (ieVC21 Arc8 VC21Arc4 and pEPR796) retrieved fromdeep-sea hydrothermal vents (Reysenbach et al 2000Boone et al 2001 Nercessian et al 2003) (group 3 inFig 1) However it contained major mismatches withsequences of species of genera Ferroglobus (AA at posi-tion 444 E coli numbering) and Geoglobus and withenvironmental clones VC21 Arc2 (CA at position 434 Ecoli numbering) VC21Arc36 (AA at position 444 E colinumbering) and pMC2A228 (CC at position 440 E colinumbering) retrieved from deep-sea hydrothermal vents(Hafenbradl et al 1996 Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Rey-senbach et al 2000 Kashefi et al 2002)
Probes encompassing uncultured organisms
In addition to probes targeting cultured Archaea wedeveloped four oligonucleotide probes specific to as yetuncultured organisms With the exception of marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) these uncultured organismshave only been detected in hydrothermal systems (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbachet al 2000 Marteinsson et al 2001 Takai et al 2001bHuber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) The probeS--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5 in Fig 1) matched per-fectly all sequences belonging to the deep-sea hydrother-mal vent euryarchaeotic group 2 (DHVE 2 Takai andHorikoshi 1999) The probe S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19(group 6 in Fig 1) matched perfectly all sequences fromthe recently discovered environmental clade deep-seahydrothermal vent euryarchaeotic group 8 (DHVE 8 Takaiand Horikoshi 1999) Burggraf et al (1997) designedprobes specific to the Korarchaeota (Barns et al 1996)However recently deposited lsquokorarchaealrsquo 16S rRNAsequences retrieved from coastal and deep-sea hydro-thermal vents contained several mismatches with thelatter probes We therefore designed the probe S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 to encompass most of the 16S rRNA
sequences of Korarchaeota available in the databases(group 14 in Fig 1) The probe S--MgI-0391-b-A-20matched most sequences belonging to the marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) However some sequences con-tained a slightly destabilizing TG mismatch at positions398 or 407 (E coli numbering)
Finally a new general archaeal probe was developed inorder to include the new archaeal lineage DHVE8 (Ner-cessian et al 2003) (group 1 in Fig 1) In contrast to theArchaea-specific probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 developedby Stahl and Amann (1991) the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 (group 1 in Fig 1) perfectly matched the 16S rRNAfrom the DHVE8 lineage However similar to the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 the new probe still contained severalstrongly destabilizing mismatches with some DHVE2 (CAat position 928) and all Korarchaeota sequences (CA andTG at positions 923 and 930)
Specificity studies
The specificity of selected oligonucleotide sequencesrevealed by comparison with available rRNA sequencedatabases was ensured by optimization of experimentalhybridization conditions The hybridization and post-hybridization washing temperatures ensuring specificitywere experimentally determined for the 14 probes char-acterized in this study (Table 1) The 14 identical mem-branes containing nucleic acids from the reference strainsand environmental clones mentioned in Table 2 are shownin Fig 2 Dot-blot hybridization experiments generallyconfirmed the in silico specificity analysis Probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave positive signals for most of thearchaeal nucleic acids Confirming the in silico analysisno hybridization signals were obtained for clonespEPR193 pEPR152 and pEPR153 (Fig 2a blots C4 G2and G3 respectively) that belonged to the lineagesDHVE2 or Korarchaeota The organisms targeted byprobes S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (Fig 2b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (Fig 2c) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (Fig 2e)S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (Fig 2f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20(Fig 2g) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2i) S-F-Prd-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (Fig 2k) andS--MgI-0391-a-A-20 (Fig 2m) were unambiguouslydiscriminated from non-target strains The probe S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 was found to be specific for mesophilic ther-mophilic and hyperthermophilic methanogens from theorder Methanococcales when washed at 56infinC (data notshown) It was specific for hyperthermophilic methano-gens only when washed at 58infinC (Fig 2d) This differencein specificity resulted from a slightly destabilizing GT mis-match at position 1121 (E coli numbering) in the se-quences of Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus
174 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 175
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Methanococcus voltae Under the conditions usedthe probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 was specific for membersof the families Thermoproteaceae and ThermofiliaceaeHowever lower signal intensities probably due to thepresence of a single weakly destabilizing mismatch were
observed for Thermocladium (family Thermoproteaceae)and Thermofilum (family Thermofiliaceae) (Fig 2l) Ourexperimental conditions confirmed that probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16 matched perfectly nearly all sequences ofthe order Desulfurococcales and some of the order Ther-
Table 2 Reference strains and environmental clones used in this study
Reference strains or clonesa Position on blotb Reference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (DSM 2661T) A1 Jones et al (1983)Methanotorris igneus (DSM 5666T) A2 Burggraf et al (1990a)Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (DSM 2095T) A3 Huber et al (1982)Methanococcus voltae (DSM 1537T) A4 Balch et al (1979)Thermococcus celer (DSM 2476T) A5 Zillig et al (1983b)Pyrococcus abyssi strain GE5 A6 Erauso et al (1993)Archaeoglobus profundus (DSM 5631T) A7 Burggraf et al (1990b)Methanopyrus kandleri (DSM 6324T) B1 Kurr et al (1991)Methanoculleus marisnigri (DSM 1498T) B2 Romesser et al (1979)Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T) B3 Paterek and Smith (1985)pEPR809 (Methanocaldococcus spp) B4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR743 (Thermococcus spp) B5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR145 (Pyrococcus spp) B6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR796 (Archaeoglobus spp) B7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR829 (Methanopyrus spp) C1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR717 (DHVE 2) C2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR719 (DHVE 2) C3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR193 (DHVE 2) C4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR824 (DHVE 8) C5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR895 (DHVE 8) C6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR731 (DHVE 8) C7 Nercessian et al (2003)Pyrodictium abyssi (DSM 6158T) D1 Pley et al (1991)Pyrolobus fumari (DSM 11204T) D2 Blochl et al (1997)Ignicoccus pacificus (DSM 13166T) D3 Huber et al (2000)Staphylothermus marinus (DSM 3639T) D4 Fiala et al (1986)Aeropyrum pernix (DSM 11879T) D5 Sako et al (1996)Thermococcus profundus (JCM 9378T) D6 Kobayashi et al (1994)Desulfurococcus mobilis (DSM 2161T) D7 Zillig et al (1982)Acidilobus aceticus (DSM 11585T) E1 Prokofeva et al (2000)Sulfolobus shibatae (DSM 5389T) E2 Grogan et al (1990)Metallosphaera sedula (DSM 5348T) E3 Huber et al (1989)Acidianus brierleyi (DSM 1651T) E4 Zillig et al (1980)Thermoproteus tenax (DSM 2078T) E5 Zillig et al (1981)Thermocladium modestius (JCM 0088T) E6 Itoh et al (1998)Thermofilum pendens (DSM 2475T) E7 Zillig et al (1983a)Pyrobaculum organotrophum (DSM 4185T) F1 Huber et al (1987)pEPR940 (Pyrodictium spp) F2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR936 (Ignicoccus spp) F3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR805 (Staphylothermus spp) F4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR985 (Aeropyrum spp) F5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR853 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR624 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR161 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) G1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR152 (Korarchaeota) G2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR153 (Korarchaeota) G3 Nercessian et al (2003)Desulfovibrio giganteus (DSM 4123T) G4 Esnault et al (1988)
a Collection numbers of species or phylogenetic relatives of environmental clones pEPR are indicated in brackets DSM Deutsche Sammlungvon Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig Germany) JCM Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (Saitama Japan)b See Fig 2 For example 16S rDNA of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is located on dot A1 (lane A column 1 in Fig 2)
Fig 1 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree showing the archaeal groups targeted by the newly designed probes The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and the correction of Jukes and Cantor (1969) Archaeal lineages marked group 1 to group 14 were targeted by the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (group 1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (group 2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (group 3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (group 4) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (group 6) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (group7) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (group 8) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (group 10) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (group 11) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (group 12) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (group 13) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (group 14) Bold sequences were used in the specificity studies (see Table 2 and Fig 2)
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 173
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
mesophilic methanogenic species of the genera Methan-othermococcus and Methanococcus respectively Theprobes S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 and S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16(groups 7 and 10 in Fig 1 respectively) perfectly boundall sequences of the genera Methanopyrus and Ignicoc-cus (Boone et al 2001) Contrary to other members ofthe order Desulfurococcales species of Ignicoccus areobligate chemolithoautotrophic sulphur reducers (Booneet al 2001) With the hyperthermophilic methanogensthese organisms probably represent the main primaryproducers in high-temperature marine environmentsThe probe S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 perfectly matched allsequences of the hyperthermophilic mixotrophic sulphate-or sulphite- and thiosulphate-reducing organisms of thegenus Archaeoglobus and environmental clones (ieVC21 Arc8 VC21Arc4 and pEPR796) retrieved fromdeep-sea hydrothermal vents (Reysenbach et al 2000Boone et al 2001 Nercessian et al 2003) (group 3 inFig 1) However it contained major mismatches withsequences of species of genera Ferroglobus (AA at posi-tion 444 E coli numbering) and Geoglobus and withenvironmental clones VC21 Arc2 (CA at position 434 Ecoli numbering) VC21Arc36 (AA at position 444 E colinumbering) and pMC2A228 (CC at position 440 E colinumbering) retrieved from deep-sea hydrothermal vents(Hafenbradl et al 1996 Takai and Horikoshi 1999 Rey-senbach et al 2000 Kashefi et al 2002)
Probes encompassing uncultured organisms
In addition to probes targeting cultured Archaea wedeveloped four oligonucleotide probes specific to as yetuncultured organisms With the exception of marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) these uncultured organismshave only been detected in hydrothermal systems (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Takai and Sako 1999 Reysenbachet al 2000 Marteinsson et al 2001 Takai et al 2001bHuber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) The probeS--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5 in Fig 1) matched per-fectly all sequences belonging to the deep-sea hydrother-mal vent euryarchaeotic group 2 (DHVE 2 Takai andHorikoshi 1999) The probe S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19(group 6 in Fig 1) matched perfectly all sequences fromthe recently discovered environmental clade deep-seahydrothermal vent euryarchaeotic group 8 (DHVE 8 Takaiand Horikoshi 1999) Burggraf et al (1997) designedprobes specific to the Korarchaeota (Barns et al 1996)However recently deposited lsquokorarchaealrsquo 16S rRNAsequences retrieved from coastal and deep-sea hydro-thermal vents contained several mismatches with thelatter probes We therefore designed the probe S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 to encompass most of the 16S rRNA
sequences of Korarchaeota available in the databases(group 14 in Fig 1) The probe S--MgI-0391-b-A-20matched most sequences belonging to the marine groupI Crenarchaeota (group 13 in Fig 1) retrieved from variousmarine ecosystems (Vetriani et al 1999 Massana et al2000 Huber et al 2002) However some sequences con-tained a slightly destabilizing TG mismatch at positions398 or 407 (E coli numbering)
Finally a new general archaeal probe was developed inorder to include the new archaeal lineage DHVE8 (Ner-cessian et al 2003) (group 1 in Fig 1) In contrast to theArchaea-specific probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 developedby Stahl and Amann (1991) the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 (group 1 in Fig 1) perfectly matched the 16S rRNAfrom the DHVE8 lineage However similar to the probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-20 the new probe still contained severalstrongly destabilizing mismatches with some DHVE2 (CAat position 928) and all Korarchaeota sequences (CA andTG at positions 923 and 930)
Specificity studies
The specificity of selected oligonucleotide sequencesrevealed by comparison with available rRNA sequencedatabases was ensured by optimization of experimentalhybridization conditions The hybridization and post-hybridization washing temperatures ensuring specificitywere experimentally determined for the 14 probes char-acterized in this study (Table 1) The 14 identical mem-branes containing nucleic acids from the reference strainsand environmental clones mentioned in Table 2 are shownin Fig 2 Dot-blot hybridization experiments generallyconfirmed the in silico specificity analysis Probe S-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave positive signals for most of thearchaeal nucleic acids Confirming the in silico analysisno hybridization signals were obtained for clonespEPR193 pEPR152 and pEPR153 (Fig 2a blots C4 G2and G3 respectively) that belonged to the lineagesDHVE2 or Korarchaeota The organisms targeted byprobes S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (Fig 2b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (Fig 2c) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (Fig 2e)S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (Fig 2f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20(Fig 2g) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2i) S-F-Prd-0463-a-A-16 (Fig 2j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (Fig 2k) andS--MgI-0391-a-A-20 (Fig 2m) were unambiguouslydiscriminated from non-target strains The probe S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 was found to be specific for mesophilic ther-mophilic and hyperthermophilic methanogens from theorder Methanococcales when washed at 56infinC (data notshown) It was specific for hyperthermophilic methano-gens only when washed at 58infinC (Fig 2d) This differencein specificity resulted from a slightly destabilizing GT mis-match at position 1121 (E coli numbering) in the se-quences of Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus
174 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 175
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Methanococcus voltae Under the conditions usedthe probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 was specific for membersof the families Thermoproteaceae and ThermofiliaceaeHowever lower signal intensities probably due to thepresence of a single weakly destabilizing mismatch were
observed for Thermocladium (family Thermoproteaceae)and Thermofilum (family Thermofiliaceae) (Fig 2l) Ourexperimental conditions confirmed that probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16 matched perfectly nearly all sequences ofthe order Desulfurococcales and some of the order Ther-
Table 2 Reference strains and environmental clones used in this study
Reference strains or clonesa Position on blotb Reference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (DSM 2661T) A1 Jones et al (1983)Methanotorris igneus (DSM 5666T) A2 Burggraf et al (1990a)Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (DSM 2095T) A3 Huber et al (1982)Methanococcus voltae (DSM 1537T) A4 Balch et al (1979)Thermococcus celer (DSM 2476T) A5 Zillig et al (1983b)Pyrococcus abyssi strain GE5 A6 Erauso et al (1993)Archaeoglobus profundus (DSM 5631T) A7 Burggraf et al (1990b)Methanopyrus kandleri (DSM 6324T) B1 Kurr et al (1991)Methanoculleus marisnigri (DSM 1498T) B2 Romesser et al (1979)Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T) B3 Paterek and Smith (1985)pEPR809 (Methanocaldococcus spp) B4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR743 (Thermococcus spp) B5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR145 (Pyrococcus spp) B6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR796 (Archaeoglobus spp) B7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR829 (Methanopyrus spp) C1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR717 (DHVE 2) C2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR719 (DHVE 2) C3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR193 (DHVE 2) C4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR824 (DHVE 8) C5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR895 (DHVE 8) C6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR731 (DHVE 8) C7 Nercessian et al (2003)Pyrodictium abyssi (DSM 6158T) D1 Pley et al (1991)Pyrolobus fumari (DSM 11204T) D2 Blochl et al (1997)Ignicoccus pacificus (DSM 13166T) D3 Huber et al (2000)Staphylothermus marinus (DSM 3639T) D4 Fiala et al (1986)Aeropyrum pernix (DSM 11879T) D5 Sako et al (1996)Thermococcus profundus (JCM 9378T) D6 Kobayashi et al (1994)Desulfurococcus mobilis (DSM 2161T) D7 Zillig et al (1982)Acidilobus aceticus (DSM 11585T) E1 Prokofeva et al (2000)Sulfolobus shibatae (DSM 5389T) E2 Grogan et al (1990)Metallosphaera sedula (DSM 5348T) E3 Huber et al (1989)Acidianus brierleyi (DSM 1651T) E4 Zillig et al (1980)Thermoproteus tenax (DSM 2078T) E5 Zillig et al (1981)Thermocladium modestius (JCM 0088T) E6 Itoh et al (1998)Thermofilum pendens (DSM 2475T) E7 Zillig et al (1983a)Pyrobaculum organotrophum (DSM 4185T) F1 Huber et al (1987)pEPR940 (Pyrodictium spp) F2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR936 (Ignicoccus spp) F3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR805 (Staphylothermus spp) F4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR985 (Aeropyrum spp) F5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR853 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR624 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR161 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) G1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR152 (Korarchaeota) G2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR153 (Korarchaeota) G3 Nercessian et al (2003)Desulfovibrio giganteus (DSM 4123T) G4 Esnault et al (1988)
a Collection numbers of species or phylogenetic relatives of environmental clones pEPR are indicated in brackets DSM Deutsche Sammlungvon Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig Germany) JCM Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (Saitama Japan)b See Fig 2 For example 16S rDNA of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is located on dot A1 (lane A column 1 in Fig 2)
Fig 1 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree showing the archaeal groups targeted by the newly designed probes The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and the correction of Jukes and Cantor (1969) Archaeal lineages marked group 1 to group 14 were targeted by the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (group 1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (group 2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (group 3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (group 4) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (group 6) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (group7) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (group 8) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (group 10) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (group 11) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (group 12) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (group 13) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (group 14) Bold sequences were used in the specificity studies (see Table 2 and Fig 2)
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
174 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 175
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Methanococcus voltae Under the conditions usedthe probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 was specific for membersof the families Thermoproteaceae and ThermofiliaceaeHowever lower signal intensities probably due to thepresence of a single weakly destabilizing mismatch were
observed for Thermocladium (family Thermoproteaceae)and Thermofilum (family Thermofiliaceae) (Fig 2l) Ourexperimental conditions confirmed that probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16 matched perfectly nearly all sequences ofthe order Desulfurococcales and some of the order Ther-
Table 2 Reference strains and environmental clones used in this study
Reference strains or clonesa Position on blotb Reference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (DSM 2661T) A1 Jones et al (1983)Methanotorris igneus (DSM 5666T) A2 Burggraf et al (1990a)Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (DSM 2095T) A3 Huber et al (1982)Methanococcus voltae (DSM 1537T) A4 Balch et al (1979)Thermococcus celer (DSM 2476T) A5 Zillig et al (1983b)Pyrococcus abyssi strain GE5 A6 Erauso et al (1993)Archaeoglobus profundus (DSM 5631T) A7 Burggraf et al (1990b)Methanopyrus kandleri (DSM 6324T) B1 Kurr et al (1991)Methanoculleus marisnigri (DSM 1498T) B2 Romesser et al (1979)Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T) B3 Paterek and Smith (1985)pEPR809 (Methanocaldococcus spp) B4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR743 (Thermococcus spp) B5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR145 (Pyrococcus spp) B6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR796 (Archaeoglobus spp) B7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR829 (Methanopyrus spp) C1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR717 (DHVE 2) C2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR719 (DHVE 2) C3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR193 (DHVE 2) C4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR824 (DHVE 8) C5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR895 (DHVE 8) C6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR731 (DHVE 8) C7 Nercessian et al (2003)Pyrodictium abyssi (DSM 6158T) D1 Pley et al (1991)Pyrolobus fumari (DSM 11204T) D2 Blochl et al (1997)Ignicoccus pacificus (DSM 13166T) D3 Huber et al (2000)Staphylothermus marinus (DSM 3639T) D4 Fiala et al (1986)Aeropyrum pernix (DSM 11879T) D5 Sako et al (1996)Thermococcus profundus (JCM 9378T) D6 Kobayashi et al (1994)Desulfurococcus mobilis (DSM 2161T) D7 Zillig et al (1982)Acidilobus aceticus (DSM 11585T) E1 Prokofeva et al (2000)Sulfolobus shibatae (DSM 5389T) E2 Grogan et al (1990)Metallosphaera sedula (DSM 5348T) E3 Huber et al (1989)Acidianus brierleyi (DSM 1651T) E4 Zillig et al (1980)Thermoproteus tenax (DSM 2078T) E5 Zillig et al (1981)Thermocladium modestius (JCM 0088T) E6 Itoh et al (1998)Thermofilum pendens (DSM 2475T) E7 Zillig et al (1983a)Pyrobaculum organotrophum (DSM 4185T) F1 Huber et al (1987)pEPR940 (Pyrodictium spp) F2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR936 (Ignicoccus spp) F3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR805 (Staphylothermus spp) F4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR985 (Aeropyrum spp) F5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR853 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR624 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR161 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) G1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR152 (Korarchaeota) G2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR153 (Korarchaeota) G3 Nercessian et al (2003)Desulfovibrio giganteus (DSM 4123T) G4 Esnault et al (1988)
a Collection numbers of species or phylogenetic relatives of environmental clones pEPR are indicated in brackets DSM Deutsche Sammlungvon Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig Germany) JCM Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (Saitama Japan)b See Fig 2 For example 16S rDNA of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is located on dot A1 (lane A column 1 in Fig 2)
Fig 1 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree showing the archaeal groups targeted by the newly designed probes The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and the correction of Jukes and Cantor (1969) Archaeal lineages marked group 1 to group 14 were targeted by the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (group 1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (group 2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (group 3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (group 4) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (group 6) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (group7) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (group 8) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (group 10) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (group 11) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (group 12) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (group 13) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (group 14) Bold sequences were used in the specificity studies (see Table 2 and Fig 2)
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 175
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Methanococcus voltae Under the conditions usedthe probe S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 was specific for membersof the families Thermoproteaceae and ThermofiliaceaeHowever lower signal intensities probably due to thepresence of a single weakly destabilizing mismatch were
observed for Thermocladium (family Thermoproteaceae)and Thermofilum (family Thermofiliaceae) (Fig 2l) Ourexperimental conditions confirmed that probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16 matched perfectly nearly all sequences ofthe order Desulfurococcales and some of the order Ther-
Table 2 Reference strains and environmental clones used in this study
Reference strains or clonesa Position on blotb Reference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (DSM 2661T) A1 Jones et al (1983)Methanotorris igneus (DSM 5666T) A2 Burggraf et al (1990a)Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus (DSM 2095T) A3 Huber et al (1982)Methanococcus voltae (DSM 1537T) A4 Balch et al (1979)Thermococcus celer (DSM 2476T) A5 Zillig et al (1983b)Pyrococcus abyssi strain GE5 A6 Erauso et al (1993)Archaeoglobus profundus (DSM 5631T) A7 Burggraf et al (1990b)Methanopyrus kandleri (DSM 6324T) B1 Kurr et al (1991)Methanoculleus marisnigri (DSM 1498T) B2 Romesser et al (1979)Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T) B3 Paterek and Smith (1985)pEPR809 (Methanocaldococcus spp) B4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR743 (Thermococcus spp) B5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR145 (Pyrococcus spp) B6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR796 (Archaeoglobus spp) B7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR829 (Methanopyrus spp) C1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR717 (DHVE 2) C2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR719 (DHVE 2) C3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR193 (DHVE 2) C4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR824 (DHVE 8) C5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR895 (DHVE 8) C6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR731 (DHVE 8) C7 Nercessian et al (2003)Pyrodictium abyssi (DSM 6158T) D1 Pley et al (1991)Pyrolobus fumari (DSM 11204T) D2 Blochl et al (1997)Ignicoccus pacificus (DSM 13166T) D3 Huber et al (2000)Staphylothermus marinus (DSM 3639T) D4 Fiala et al (1986)Aeropyrum pernix (DSM 11879T) D5 Sako et al (1996)Thermococcus profundus (JCM 9378T) D6 Kobayashi et al (1994)Desulfurococcus mobilis (DSM 2161T) D7 Zillig et al (1982)Acidilobus aceticus (DSM 11585T) E1 Prokofeva et al (2000)Sulfolobus shibatae (DSM 5389T) E2 Grogan et al (1990)Metallosphaera sedula (DSM 5348T) E3 Huber et al (1989)Acidianus brierleyi (DSM 1651T) E4 Zillig et al (1980)Thermoproteus tenax (DSM 2078T) E5 Zillig et al (1981)Thermocladium modestius (JCM 0088T) E6 Itoh et al (1998)Thermofilum pendens (DSM 2475T) E7 Zillig et al (1983a)Pyrobaculum organotrophum (DSM 4185T) F1 Huber et al (1987)pEPR940 (Pyrodictium spp) F2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR936 (Ignicoccus spp) F3 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR805 (Staphylothermus spp) F4 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR985 (Aeropyrum spp) F5 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR853 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F6 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR624 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) F7 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR161 (marine Crenarchaeota group I) G1 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR152 (Korarchaeota) G2 Nercessian et al (2003)pEPR153 (Korarchaeota) G3 Nercessian et al (2003)Desulfovibrio giganteus (DSM 4123T) G4 Esnault et al (1988)
a Collection numbers of species or phylogenetic relatives of environmental clones pEPR are indicated in brackets DSM Deutsche Sammlungvon Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig Germany) JCM Japanese Collection of Microorganisms (Saitama Japan)b See Fig 2 For example 16S rDNA of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii is located on dot A1 (lane A column 1 in Fig 2)
Fig 1 16S rDNA phylogenetic tree showing the archaeal groups targeted by the newly designed probes The tree was constructed using the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) and the correction of Jukes and Cantor (1969) Archaeal lineages marked group 1 to group 14 were targeted by the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (group 1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (group 2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (group 3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (group 4) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (group 5) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (group 6) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (group7) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (group 8) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (group 9) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (group 10) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (group 11) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (group 12) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (group 13) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (group 14) Bold sequences were used in the specificity studies (see Table 2 and Fig 2)
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
176 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
moproteales (Fig 2h blots E6 and E7) but not those ofthe genus Desulfurococcus (Fig 2h blot D7) Under low-stringency washing conditions (65infinC) signal intensities oftargeted organisms were strong but a faint positive signalwas also observed for the clones pEPR152 and pEPR153(Korarchaeota) Using higher stringency washing condi-tions (70infinC) poor fluorescence intensities (Fig 2h)were obtained for targeted organisms but Korarchaeotasequences were efficiently discriminated [probably be-cause of the presence of a single weak destabilizingmismatch (GT at position 749 E coli numbering)] ProbeS--Kor-0554-a-A-18 gave a positive signal only when hy-bridized with nucleic acids of clone pEPR153 but failedto hybridize with clone pEPR152 [16S rRNA sequence ofthe latter archaeal clone had a CT mismatch atposition 565 (E coli numbering)]
Detection of Archaea subgroups in environmental samples
Archaeal 16S rDNA amplicons were obtained by poly-merase chain reaction (PCR) from DNA isolated fromdeep-sea hydrothermal samples (Table 3) The amplifica-tion products were transferred onto positively chargednylon membranes DNA fixed to membranes was thenhybridized against the 14 designed and validated probesunder the conditions mentioned in Table 1 (Fig 3) ProbeS-D-Arch-0915-a-A-17 gave strong positive signals for allamplification products All other probes except those tar-geting members of Sulfolobales Pyrodictiaceae Thermo-proteaceae and Korarchaeota gave positive signals withdifferent intensities depending on the sample Our resultsconfirmed the apparent absence of thermoacidophiles ofthe order Sulfolobales and Thermoproteaceae in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environments Although end-
member hydrothermal fluid pH is usually below pH 45Sulfolobales may not tolerate large fluctuations in pH thatprobably occur in the zones of mixing of sea water andhydrothermal fluids (Jannasch 1995) The absence ofmembers of Thermoproteaceae is more likely to resultfrom their low tolerance of the high ionic strength of seawater and hydrothermal fluid mixtures Conversely iso-lates andor 16S rRNA sequences of Pyrodictiaceae andKorarchaeota have been retrieved from deep-sea hydro-thermal environments (Boone et al 2001 Teske et al
Fig 3 Dot-blot hybridizations of archaeal amplicons from diverse deep-sea hydrothermal samples The sample codes (A to I) are those reported in Table 3 The 16S rDNAs were hybridized with the following probes D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (1) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (2) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (3) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (4) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (5) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (6) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (7) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (8) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (9) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (10) See Table 1 and Fig 1 for specificity and coverage
Fig 2 Dot-blot analyses of probe specificities The layout of the 46 target and non-target 16S rDNA sequences on blots is shown in Table 2 The blots were hybridized with the following probes S-D-Arch-0915-b-A-17 (a) S-O-Tcl-1408-a-A-18 (b) S-G-Agb-0431-a-A-21 (c) S-F-Mcc-1109-b-A-20 (d) S--DHVE2-0392-a-A-20 (e) S--DHVE8-1358-a-A-19 (f) S-G-Mp-0431-a-A-20 (g) S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-21 (h) S-F-Prd-0488-a-A-16 (i) S-G-Ign-0463-a-A-16 (j) S-O-Sulf-1045-a-A-18 (k) S-F-Thp-1225-a-A-22 (l) S--MgI-0391-b-A-20 (m) S--Kor-0554-a-A-18 (n) As a control the 16S rDNA of Desulfovibrio giganteus (blot G4) yielded a positive signal when hybridized with the general bacterial probe S-D-Bact-0388-a-A-18 (data not shown)
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 177
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
2002 Nercessian et al 2003) This may suggest that ifpresent they were probably too low in abundance in oursample to be detected
Probes targeting Thermococcales Archaeoglobus sppand Methanocaldococcaceae gave positive signals inmost of the samples confirming their widespread distri-bution in deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems (Booneet al 2001) Hybridization signals specific to Methanopy-rus were obtained only in a few samples from EPR AsMethanopyrus- and Methanocaldococcus-like organismswere enriched from the MAR sediments (C Jeanthonunpublished data) but not or poorly detected by theirspecific probes it is presumed that hyperthermophilicchemolithoautotrophic methanogens were present in lownumbers in these samples
Although Desulfurococcales were present in all sam-ples the probes targeting lower phylogenetic levelsyielded no (family Pyrodictiaceae) or few (genus Ignicoc-cus) signals Major discrepancies (compare dots 6E to 6Iwith 7E to 7I in Fig 3) could indicate that other knowninhabitants of deep-sea hydrothermal vents such as Sta-phylothermus spp Aeropyrum spp and Thermodiscusspp (Takai and Sako 1999 Boone et al 2001 Takaiet al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) might be presentin the corresponding samples However we cannotexclude the possibility that as yet unidentified Desulfuro-coccales reacted with the probe S-O-Dsfc-0736-a-A-16
The as yet uncultured organisms targeted by the otherprobes developed in this study were present in most sam-ples Marine group I sequences have often been recov-ered in libraries from deep-sea and coastal hydrothermalvent samples (Moyer et al 1998 Takai and Horikoshi1999 Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Severalstudies suggest that these non-thermophilic organismsmay contribute significantly to the mesopelagic microbialcommunity (Karner et al 2001) and that their occurrencein hydrothermal vent samples may be attributed to theirpresence in deep bottom water and their entrainment dur-ing subsurface mixing of sea water and hydrothermal flu-ids (Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003) Ourresults are in agreement with these hypotheses as repre-sentatives of marine group I Crenarchaeota were mostlydetected in sediments and in situ samplers but not inchimney samples Inversely sequences from unculturedEuryarchaeota (DHVE 2 and DHVE 8 groups) were notdetected in sediments Based on the high G+C contentsof their 16S rRNA gene sequences a possible thermo-philic lifestyle has been proposed for these organisms(Takai et al 2001b Nercessian et al 2003) Their pref-erential distribution in the chimney environment supportsthis hypothesis
Although our set of probes encompassed most of theknown thermophilic archaeal lineages few and weak sig-nals were generally obtained with amplification productsTa
ble
3 C
hara
cter
istic
s of
hyd
roth
erm
al s
ampl
es
Sam
ple
nam
eH
ydro
ther
mal
ven
t si
tes
(co-
ordi
nate
s d
epth
)Ty
pe o
f sa
mpl
eaC
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
env
ironm
entb
Pos
ition
on b
lotc
EX
26B
io9
vent
(9infin
50cent3
3le N
10
4infin17
cent41le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
A (
5)D
iffus
e ve
nt c
olon
ized
by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
AE
X27
Bio
9 ve
nt (
9infin50
cent33le
N
104infin
17cent4
1le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or B
(4)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 1
632
mM
FeS
= 1
15 n
A T
otal
Fe
= 4
9 mM
Fe(
II) =
38
mM
pH
52
Lane
B
EX
36M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or C
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(40
ndash270
infinC)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
Lane
CE
X39
M v
ent
(9infin5
0cent83
le N
10
4infin17
cent58le
W 2
500
m)
In s
itu c
olle
ctor
D (
2)D
iffus
e ve
nt (
ordf50infin
C)
colo
nize
d by
Alv
inel
la s
pp a
nd c
over
ed b
y ba
cter
ial m
ats
HS
ndash = 6
1 m
M F
eS =
63
2 nA
Lane
D
EX
42M
ven
t (9
infin50cent
83le
N
104infin
17cent5
8le W
250
0 m
)In
situ
col
lect
or D
(2)
Diff
use
vent
(ordf
50infinC
) co
loni
zed
by A
lvin
ella
spp
and
cov
ered
by
bact
eria
l mat
sH
Sndash =
61
mM
FeS
= 6
32
nALa
ne E
IR3
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf1
5 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
si
derit
e a
nd d
olom
iteLa
ne F
IR4
Eas
t zo
ne (
36infin1
3cent80
le N
33
infin54cent
10le
W 2
300
m)
Hyd
roth
erm
al s
edim
ent
Bot
tom
par
t (ordf
7 c
m)
of a
n ordf2
0 cm
-long
cor
e co
ntai
ning
met
als
cal
cite
an
d si
derit
eLa
ne G
IR9
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e an
d is
ocub
anite
T =
ordf 4
0ndash50
infinCLa
ne H
IR12
PP
29-3
7 (3
6infin13
cent76le
N
33infin5
4cent15
le W
230
0 m
)Fr
agm
ents
of
diffu
se v
ent
ZnS
diff
user
con
tain
ing
spha
lerit
e p
yrrh
otite
ch
alco
pyrit
e is
ocub
anite
and
iron
oxi
des
Lane
I(e
xter
nal w
all)
T =
ordf 8
3ndash17
0infinC
a N
umbe
rs in
bra
cket
s in
dica
te t
he d
urat
ion
(in d
ays)
of
the
in s
itu s
ampl
er d
eplo
ymen
ts
b T
empe
ratu
res
wer
e ta
ken
by t
he t
herm
al p
robe
s m
anip
ulat
ed b
y th
e ar
ms
of t
he D
SV
Alv
in (
EX
sam
ples
) an
d th
e R
OV
Vic
tor
(IR
sam
ples
) M
n an
d O
2 w
ere
not
dete
cted
c
See
Fig
3 F
or e
xam
ple
16S
rD
NA
am
plic
ons
of E
X26
are
loca
ted
on la
ne A
in F
ig 3
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
178 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
from MAR sediments To elucidate the composition ofthese archaeal communities we constructed 16S rDNAlibraries from the sediment DNA extracts Analysis of thecloned sequences revealed that except for a few clonesrelated to marine Crenarchaeota group I all belonged tonovel archaeal lineages (O Nercessian Y Fouquet CPierre D Prieur and C Jeanthon submitted)
Because of the recognized biases introduced by usingPCR for 16S rRNA gene amplification (von Wintzingerodeet al 1997) we cannot assume that the hybridizationsignal intensities reflect the natural abundance of eachtargeted group However keeping in mind these con-straints the EPR archaeal community appeared to begenerally more diverse than the MAR samples As differ-ent DNA extraction procedures were performed on Pacificand Atlantic samples we cannot exclude the possibilitythat they could have affected the observed compositionsof archaeal communities In addition given that distinctarchaeal communities were retrieved from in situ sam-plers chimneys and hydrothermal fluid samples (Takaiand Horikoshi 1999 Reysenbach et al 2000 Takaiet al 2001b Huber et al 2002 Nercessian et al 2003)the nature of the sample type may also have influencedthe composition of archaeal communities sampled Anal-yses of higher numbers of comparable samples are there-fore clearly needed to compare archaeal communities atboth vent fields
Investigations of archaeal community diversity andstructure have generally been achieved by cloning andsequence determination of 16S rDNA genes obtained byPCR amplification of DNA isolated from the samples Thesequencing of large numbers of cloned sequences whichis often required to detect the minor members in a givenenvironmental sample is expensive time-consuming andlabour intensive In the course of this study oligonucle-otide probes targeting 16S rRNAs of defined groups ofArchaea known to thrive in high-temperature environ-ments were developed They were subsequently used toscreen samples in order rapidly to obtain indications ofthe presence of distinct lineages of Archaea This allowedus (i) to confirm the widespread distribution of Thermo-coccales Desulfurococcales Methanocaldococcaceaeand Archaeoglobus in deep-sea hydrothermal vent habi-tats and the apparent absence of Sulfolobales and Ther-moproteaceae (ii) to give new insights into the distributionof uncultured lineages and (iii) to guide us in the identifi-cation of samples suitable for further extensive studiesWe demonstrated that this suite of oligonucleotide probesrepresents an efficient tool for qualitative characterizationof archaeal communities after 16S rDNA PCR amplifica-tion Further experiments should be conducted to deter-mine the conditions needed for their application inquantitative analyses These options should be particu-larly valuable if large numbers of samples are to be anal-
ysed to study spatial and temporal variations in archaealcommunities in high-temperature habitats
Experimental procedures
Organisms and culture conditions
The 26 reference strains and 20 recombinant clones usedin this study are listed in Table 2 Most of the referencestrains were obtained as active cultures from the Deut-sche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen(Braunschweig Germany) and the Japanese Collection ofMicroorganisms (Saitama Japan) Pyrococcus abyssi strainGE5 was isolated in the laboratory Methanoculleus marisn-igri (DSM 1498T) and Methanohalophilus mahii (DSM 5219T)were kindly provided by B Ollivier and M-L Fardeau (Lab-oratoire IRD de Microbiologie des Anaeacuterobies Universiteacute deProvence Marseille France) The reference organisms werecultured as described in the references cited in Table 2 Envi-ronmental archaeal 16S rDNA inserts cloned in the pCR-21TOPO vector (Invitrogen) were obtained previously from sev-eral deep-sea hydrothermal vent DNA samples collected at13infinN on the East Pacific Rise (EPR) (Nercessian et al2003)
Design and validation of oligonucleotide probes
Design The oligonucleotide probes designed in this studyare listed in Table 1 16S rRNA sequences from targeted andnon-targeted organisms were aligned using the functionFASTALIGNER version 30 of the software ARB (httpwwwarb-homede) The oligonucleotide probes were designed manu-ally or automatically with the PROBE_DESIGN function of ARBIn silico specificities were tested using the PROBE_MATCHBLAST search and PROBE_MATCH functions of ARB Gen-Bank (httpwwwncbinlmnihgov) and the RDP (httprdpcmemsuedu) respectively The self-probe dimers andhairpin formations were controlled with the PRIMERSELECT
311 software (DNASTAR) When possible several criteriawere applied to select suitable oligonucleotide probes includ-ing (i) a length between 15 and 25 nucleotides (ii) a G+Cmol content between 50 and 70 (iii) internal positionsof major mismatches with non-targeted organisms and (iv)absence of self-probe dimers and hairpins
Probe optimization and specificity studies Pure cultures ofthe reference strains (10ndash25 ml) and recombinant clones(5 ml) were centrifuged (5000 g for 10 min at 4infinC) and thepellets were stored at -20infinC until they were used for nucleicacid extraction Nucleic acids from reference strains andrecombinant plasmids of environmental clones wereextracted using the methods described by Charbonnier et al(1995) and Sambrook et al (1989) respectively The 16SrRNA genes from reference strains were amplified byPCR using the universal reverse primer 1407R (5cent-GACGGGGGGTGWGTRCAA-3cent) in conjunction with thearchaeal forward primer 4F (5cent-TCCGGTTGATCCTGCCRG-3cent) or the bacterial forward primer 8F (5cent-AGAGTTTGATYMTGGCTCAG-3cent) The 16S rDNA genes from environ-mental clones were amplified using M13F and M13Rprimers Amplification mixtures consisted of (as finalconcentration) 1yen DNA polymerase buffer 15 mM MgCl2
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 179
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
025 mM each dATP dCTP dGTP and dTTP 02 mM eachprimer and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) in a finalvolume of 50 ml PCR cycles were performed in a Robocycler(Stratagene) as follows one cycle at 95infinC for 5 min 30cycles at 95infinC for 15 min 53infinC for 15 min 72infinC for 25 minand one cycle at 72infinC for 8 min Amplification products werechecked for quality and quantity after electrophoresis on a08 agarose gel containing 05 mg ml-1 ethidium bromide
The oligonucleotide probes were tested for specificity indot-blot hybridization assays Approximately 100 ng of 16SrDNA amplicons was suspended into 50 ml of sterile waterdenatured for 5 min at 95infinC and immediately placed on icefor 5 min Amplified products were blotted onto positivelycharged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+ Amersham Bio-sciences) using a Minifold I dotslot system (Schleicher andSchuell) and immobilized by cross-linking after 2 min expo-sure to UV light The oligonucleotide probes were 3cent end-labelled with fluorescein-11dUTP using Gene Images 3cent-oligolabelling module (Amersham Biosciences) according tothe manufacturerrsquos instructions Membranes were first incu-bated for 45 min at the appropriate hybridization temperature(Table 2) in hybridization buffer consisting of 5yen SSC 01SDS 20yen diluted blocking reagent (Amersham Biosciences)and 05 (wv) dextran sulphate in order to prevent non-specific hybridizations Specific oligonucleotide probes werethen added at a final concentration of 5 ng ml-1 and hybrid-ized overnight at the appropriate temperature The washingsteps consisted of three stringency washes (1yen SSC 01SDS) for 20 min at the wash temperature (Table 2) Fluores-cein-11dUTP-labelled DNAs were then detected with an alka-line phosphatase-conjugated antibody The fluorescent signalintensity was detected with a Storm 860 (Amersham Bio-sciences) after 3ndash6 h of incubation at room temperature withthe detection reagent Pictures were acquired using the soft-ware package IMAGEQUANT (Amersham Biosciences) andassembled with Adobe PHOTOSHOP version 50
Application of probes on 16S rDNAs obtained from hydrothermal samples
Sampling and chemical analyses Nine deep-sea hydrother-mal vent samples collected during the cruises Iris [June2001 Rainbow vent field at 36infin13cent8le N and 33infin54cent1le W onthe Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR)] and Extreme2001 (October2001 9infin50cent8le N and 104infin17cent5le W on the EPR) were used assources of environmental archaeal 16S rDNAs Samplesfrom 9infinN EPR were obtained from in situ samplers (Nerces-sian et al 2003) designed to collect microorganisms dis-charged by hydrothermal fluid emitted by active vents Thesamplers were deployed for 2ndash5 days on two different hydro-thermal active areas by the submersible Alvin (Table 3) Sam-ples from the Rainbow vent field consisted of cores ofhydrothermally influenced sediments and fragments of activediffuse vents collected by the ROV Victor (Table 3)
For 9infinN EPR samples small volumes of fluids were col-lected using the Sipper sampler (Di Meo et al 1999) forshipboard chemical analyses using voltammetric and colori-metric methods Aliquots of the samples were separated fordissolved Fe(II) and Fe(total) [defined as Fe(total) = dissolvedFe(III) + dissolved Fe(II)] and analysed by colorimetry usinga Spectronic 601 (Milton Roy) according to the ferrozine
method (Stookey 1970) Electrochemical analyses used astandard three-electrode cell The working electrode was agold amalgam (AuHg) electrode of 01 mm diameter madein commercially available polyethyl ether ketone (PEEK) tub-ing sealed with epoxy as described by Brendel and Luther(1995) Counter (Pt) and reference (AgAgCl) electrodeseach of 05 mm diameter were made similarly For the volta-mmetric measurements the voltage range scanned was from-01 V to -20 V In linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) and cyclicvoltammetry (CV) scan rates of 200 500 or 1000 mV-1 wererun depending on targeted chemical species The parame-ters for square wave voltametry (SWV) were as follows pulseheight 24 mV step increment 1 mV frequency 100 Hz scanrate 200 mV-1 LSV and CV were used to measure oxygenand sulphur species while SWV was used for detection ofmetal redox species Electrochemically conditioning the elec-trode between scans removed any chemical species from thesurface of the electrode restoring it for the next measure-ment To remove any deposited Fe or Mn the working elec-trode was conditioned at a potential of -01 V for 10 s(Brendel and Luther 1995) Before sample measurementsstandard curves were produced for O2 Mn and sulphur spe-cies as described previously (Luther et al 2001)
DNA extraction 16S rDNA amplification and dot-blothybridizations Nucleic acids from EPR samples wereextracted as described previously (Nercessian et al 2003)whereas those from MAR were obtained using the UltraCleanDNA kit (Mobio Laboratories) according to the manufacturerrsquosinstructions
The 16S rDNA genes were primarily amplified from DNAextracts using the conditions used before A semi-nestedPCR with the archaeal-specific primers 341F and 1407R wasthen performed as described previously (Nercessian et al2003) to obtain the desirable amounts of PCR productsneeded for hybridization experiments Dot-blot hybridizationswith 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probes were conducted usingthe experimental conditions determined before
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Yves Fouquet (chief scientist ofthe Iris cruise) for inviting us to participate in the Iris cruiseand analysis of the mineralogy of MAR samples Brian Glazeris also acknowledged for the chemical analyses of the 9infinNdiffuse vent fluids The authors also thank Barbara Campbellfor scientific discussion and facilities during the cruiseExtreme2001 The Iris cruise was organized by IFREMERwith the RV LrsquoAtalante and the ROV Victor The Extreme2001cruise was organized by Woods Hole Institute with RV Atlan-tis and the DSV Alvin We thank the captains and the crewsof LrsquoAtalante and Atlantis and the pilots of DSV Alvin and ROVVictor for their skilful operations Our thanks also go to Marie-Laure Fardeau and Bernard Ollivier for providing referencestrains We thank Erwan Corre Isabelle Mary and FabriceNot for scientific discussion This work was supported by theprogrammes Dorsales CNRSRhocircne-Poulenc and Intas 99-1250 and a PRIR from the Conseil Reacutegional de BretagneThe work performed at Plouzaneacute was made possible by aFEMS young researcher fellowship awarded to M Prokofevain 2001 O Nercessian is supported by a grant from theCommunauteacute Urbaine de Brest
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
180 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
References
Alm EW Oerther DB Larsen N Stahl DA and RaskinL (1996) The Oligonucleotide Probe Database Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 65 270ndash277
Balch WE Fox GE Magrum CJ Woese CR andWolfe RS (1979) Methanogens reevaluation of a uniquebiological group Microbiol Rev 43 260ndash296
Barns SM Fundyga RE Jeffries MW and Pace NR(1994) Remarkable archaeal diversity detected in a Yellow-stone National Park hot spring environment Proc NatlAcad Sci USA 91 1609ndash1613
Barns SM Delwiche CF Palmer JD and Pace NR(1996) Perspectives on archaeal diversity thermophily andmonophyly from environmental rRNA sequences ProcNatl Acad Sci USA 93 9188ndash9193
Bintrim SB Donohue TJ Handelsman J Roberts GPand Goodman RM (1997) Molecular phylogeny ofArchaea from soil Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 277ndash282
Blochl E Rachel R Burggraf S Hafenbradl D Jann-asch HW and Stetter KO (1997) Pyrolobus fumariigen and sp nov represents a novel group of Archaeaextending the upper temperature limit for life to 113degrees C Extremophiles 1 14ndash21
Boone DR Castenholz RW and Garrity GM (2001)Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol 1 2ndedn New York Springer-Verlag
Brendel PJ and Luther GW (1995) Development of agold amalgam voltammetric microelectrode for the deter-mination of dissolved Fe Mn O2 and S(-II) in porewatersof marine and freshwater sediments Environ Sci Technol29 751ndash761
Brosius J Palmer JL Kennedy JP and Noller HF(1978) Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomalRNA gene from Escherichia coli Proc Natl Acad Sci USA75 4801ndash4805
Burggraf S Fricke H Neuner A Kristjansson J RouvierP Mandelco L et al (1990a) Methanococcus igneus spnov a novel hyperthermophilic methanogen from a shal-low submarine hydrothermal system Syst Appl Microbiol13 263ndash269
Burggraf S Jannasch HW Nicolaus B and Stetter KO(1990b) Archaeoglobus profundus sp nov represents anew species within the sulfate-reducing archaebacteriaSyst Appl Microbiol 13 24ndash28
Burggraf S Heyder P and Eis N (1997) A pivotal Archaeagroup Nature 385 780
Charbonnier F Forterre P Erauso G and Prieur D(1995) Purification of plasmids from thermophilic andhyperthermophilic Archaea In Thermophiles Archaea aLaboratory Manual Robb FT and Place AR (eds)Cold Spring Harbor NY Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryPress pp 87ndash90
DeLong EF (1992) Archaea in coastal marine environ-ments Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89 5685ndash5689
Di Meo CA Wakefield JR and Cary SC (1999) A newdevice for sampling small volumes of water from marinemicro-environments Deep-Sea Res I 46 1279ndash1287
Erauso G Reysenbach AL Godfroy A Meunier JRCrump B Partensky F et al (1993) Pyrococcus abyssisp nov a new hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from
a deep-sea hydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 160 338ndash349
Esnault G Caumette P and Garcia JL (1988) Charac-terization of Desulfovibrio giganteus sp nov a sulfatereducing bacterium isolated from a brackish coastallagoon Syst Appl Microbiol 10 147ndash151
Fiala G Stetter KO Jannasch HW Langworthy TAand Madon J (1986) Staphylothermus marinus sp novrepresents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic sub-marine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98infinCSyst Appl Microbiol 8 106ndash113
Garrity GM and Holt JG (2001) The road map to themanual In Bergeyrsquos Manual of Systematic BacteriologyVol 1 2nd edn Boone DR Castenholz RW and Gar-rity GM (eds) New York Springer-Verlag pp 119ndash166
Grogan D Palm P and Zillig W (1990) Isolate B12 whichharbours a virus-like element represents a new species ofthe archaebacterial genus Sulfolobus Sulfolobus shibataesp nov Arch Microbiol 154 594ndash599
Hafenbradl D Keller M Dirmeier R Rachel R Rossna-gel P Burggraf S et al (1996) Ferroglobus placidusgen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilic archaeumthat oxidizes Fe2+ at neutral pH under anoxic conditionsArch Microbiol 166 308ndash314
Huber G Spinnler C Gambacorta A and Stetter KO(1989) Metallosphaera sedula gen and sp nov representsa new genus of aerobic metal-mobilizing thermoaceto-philic archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 12 38ndash47
Huber H Thomm M Koumlnig H Thies G and Stetter KO(1982) Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus a novel ther-mophilic lithotrophic methanogen Arch Microbiol 132 47ndash50
Huber H Burggraf S Mayer T Wyschkony I RachelR and Stetter KO (2000) Ignicoccus gen nov anovel genus of hyperthermophilic chemolithoautotrophicArchaea represented by two new species Ignicoccusislandicus sp nov and Ignicoccus pacificus sp nov Int JSyst Evol Microbiol 50 2093ndash2100
Huber JA Butterfield DA and Baross JA (2002) Tem-poral changes in archaeal diversity and chemistry in a mid-ocean ridge subseafloor habitat Appl Environ Microbiol68 1585ndash1594
Huber R Kristjansson JK and Stetter KO (1987) Pyro-baculum gen nov a new genus of neutrophilic rod-shaped archaebacteria from continental solfataras growingoptimally at 100infinC Arch Microbiol 149 95ndash101
Hugenholtz P (2002) Exploring prokaryotic diversity in thegenomic area Genome Biol 3 1ndash8
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (1998) Thermocladiummodestius gen nov sp nov a new genus of rod-shapedextremely thermophilic crenarchaeote Int J Syst Bacteriol48 879ndash887
Itoh T Suzuki K and Nakase T (2002) Vulcanisaetadistributa gen nov sp nov and Vulcanisaeta souniana spnov novel hyperthermophilic rod-shaped crenarchaeotesisolated from hot springs in Japan Int J Syst Evol Microbiol52 1097ndash1104
Jannasch HW (1995) Microbial interactions with hydro-thermal fluids In Seafloor Hydrothermal SystemsPhysical Chemical Biological and Geological Interac-tions Humphris SE Zierenberg RA Mullineaux LS
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
16S rRNA probes for Archaea thriving in hot habitats 181
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
and Thomson RE (eds) Washington American Geo-physical Union pp 273ndash296
Jones WJ Leigh JA Mayer F Woese CR and WolfeRS (1983) Methanococcus jannaschii sp nov anextremely thermophilic methanogen from a submarinehydrothermal vent Arch Microbiol 136 254ndash261
Jukes TH and Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of proteinmolecules In Mammalian Protein Metabolism MunroHN (ed) New York Academic Press pp 21ndash132
Karner MB DeLong EF and Karl DM (2001) Archaealdominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific OceanNature 409 507ndash510
Kashefi K Tor JM Holmes DE Gaw Van Praagh CVReysenbach AL and Lovley DR (2002) Geoglobusahangari gen nov sp nov a novel hyperthermophilicarchaeon capable of oxidizing organic acids and growingautotrophically on hydrogen with Fe(III) serving as the soleelectron acceptor Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52 719ndash728
Kobayashi T Kwak YS Akiba T Kudo T and HorikoshiK (1994) Thermococcus profundus sp nov a new hyper-thermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrother-mal vent Syst Appl Microbiol 17 232ndash236
Kurr M Huber R Koumlnig H Jannasch HW Fricke HTrincone A et al (1991) Methanopyrus kandleri gen andsp nov represents a novel group of hyperthermophilicmethanogens growing at 110infinC Arch Microbiol 156 239ndash247
Luther GW Glazer BT Hohmann L Popp JI TaillefertM Rozan TF et al (2001) Sulfur speciation monitoredin situ with solid state gold amalgam voltammetric micro-electrodes polysulfides as a special case in sedimentsmicrobial mats and hydrothermal vent waters J EnvironMonit 3 61ndash66
Marteinsson VT Kristjansson JK Kristmannsdottir HDahlkvist M Saemundsson K Hannington M et al(2001) Discovery and description of giant submarine smec-tite cones on the seafloor in Eyjafjordur northern Icelandand a novel thermal microbial habitat Appl Environ Micro-biol 67 827ndash833
Massana R DeLong EF and Pedros-Alio C (2000) A fewcosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaealassemblages in widely different oceanic provinces ApplEnviron Microbiol 66 1777ndash1787
Moyer CL Tiedje JM Dobbs FC and Karl DM(1998) Diversity of deep-sea hydrothermal vent Archaeafrom Loihi Seamount Hawaii Deep-Sea Res II 45 303ndash317
Nercessian O Reysenbach AL Prieur D and JeanthonC (2003) Archaeal diversity associated with in situ sam-plers deployed on hydrothermal vents on the East PacificRise (13infinN) Environ Microbiol 5 492ndash502
Orphan VJ Taylor LT Hafenbradl D and Delong EF(2000) Culture-dependent and culture-independentcharacterization of microbial assemblages associated withhigh-temperature petroleum reservoirs Appl EnvironMicrobiol 66 700ndash711
Paterek JR and Smith PH (1985) Isolation and charac-terization of a halophilic methanogen from Great Salt LakeAppl Environ Microbiol 50 877ndash881
Pley U Schipka A Gambacorta A Jannasch HWFricke H Rachel R and Stetter KO (1991) Pyrodictium
abyssi sp nov represents a novel heterotrophic marinearchaeal hyperthermophile growing at 110infinC Syst ApplMicrobiol 14 245ndash253
Prokofeva MI Miroshnichenko ML Kostrikina NAChernyh NA Kuznetsov BB Tourova TP and Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA (2000) Acidilobus aceticus gen novsp nov a novel anaerobic thermoacidophilic archaeonfrom continental hot vents in Kamchatka Int J Syst EvolMicrobiol 50 2001ndash2008
Raskin L Stromley JM Rittmann BE and Stahl DA(1994) Group-specific 16S rRNA hybridization probes todescribe natural communities of methanogens Appl Envi-ron Microbiol 60 1232ndash1240
Reysenbach AL Longnecker K and Kirshtein J (2000)Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situgrowth chamber deployed at a Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydro-thermal vent Appl Environ Microbiol 66 3798ndash3806
Romesser JA Wolfe RS Mayer F Spiess E andWalther-Mauruschat A (1979) Methanogenium a newgenus of marine methanogenic Bacteria and characteriza-tion of Methanogenium cariaci sp nov and Methanoge-nium marisnigri sp nov Arch Microbiol 121 147ndash153
Saitou N and Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining methoda new tool for reconstructing phylogenetic trees Mol BiolEvol 4 406ndash425
Sako Y Nomura N Uchida A Ishida Y Morii H KogaY et al (1996) Aeropyrum pernix gen nov sp nov anovel aerobic hyperthermophilic archaeon growing at tem-peratures up to 100 degrees C Int J Syst Bacteriol 461070ndash1077
Sambrook J Fritsch EF and Maniatis T (1989) Molecu-lar Cloning a Laboratory Manual 2nd edn Cold SpringHarbor NY Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Stahl DA and Amann R (1991) Development and appli-cation of nucleic acid probes In Nucleic Acids Techniquesin Bacterial Systematics Stackebrandt E and Goodfel-low E (eds) Chichester John Wiley amp Sons pp 205ndash248
Stookey LL (1970) Ferrozine ndash a new spectrophotometricreagent for iron Anal Chem 42 779ndash781
Takai K and Horikoshi K (1999) Genetic diversity ofArchaea in deep-sea hydrothermal vent environmentsGenetics 152 1285ndash1297
Takai K and Sako Y (1999) A molecular view of archaealdiversity in marine and terrestrial hot water environmentsFEMS Microbiol Ecol 28 177ndash188
Takai K Sugai A Itoh T and Horikoshi K (2000) Palae-ococcus ferrophilus gen nov sp nov a barophilic hyper-thermophilic archaeon from a deep-sea hydrothermal ventInt J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 489ndash500
Takai K Moser DP DeFlaun M Onstott TC and Fre-derickson JK (2001a) Archaeal diversity in waters fromdeep South African gold mines Appl Environ Microbiol 673618ndash3629
Takai K Komatsu T Inagaki F and Horikoshi K (2001b)Distribution of Archaea in a black smoker chimney struc-ture Appl Environ Microbiol 67 3618ndash3629
Teske A Hinrichs KU Edgcomb V de Vera Gomez AKysela D Sylva SP et al (2002) Microbial diversity ofhydrothermal sediments in the Guaymas Basin evidencefor anaerobic methanotrophic communities Appl EnvironMicrobiol 68 1994ndash2007
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94
182 O Nercessian et al
copy 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Environmental Microbiology 6 170ndash182
Vetriani C Jannasch HW MacGregor BJ Stahl DAand Reysenbach AL (1999) Population structure andphylogenetic characterization of marine benthic Archaea indeep-sea sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 65 4375ndash4384
von Wintzingerode F Gobel UB and Stackebrandt E(1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmen-tal samples pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis FEMSMicrobiol Rev 21 213ndash229
Woese CR Kandler O and Wheelis ML (1990) Towardsa natural system of organisms proposal for the domainsArchaea Bacteria and Eucarya Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87 4576ndash4579
Zillig W Stetter KO Wunderl S Schulz W Priess Hand Scholz I (1980) The SulfolobusndashlsquoCaldariellarsquo grouptaxonomy on the basis of the structure of DNA dependentRNA polymerases Arch Microbiol 125 259ndash269
Zillig W Stetter KO Schaumlfer W Janekovic D Wunderl
S Holz J and Palm P (1981) Thermoproteales a noveltype of extremely thermoacidophilic anaerobic archaebac-teria isolated from Icelandic solfataras Zentbl BakteriolMikrobiol Hyg 1 Abt Orig C 2 205ndash227
Zillig W Stetter KO Prangishvilli D Schaumlfer WWunderl S Jankovic D et al (1982) Desulfurococ-caceae the second family of the extremely thermophilicanaerobic sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales Zentbl Bakte-riol Hyg Abt Orig C 3 304ndash317
Zillig W Gierl A Schreiber G Wunderl S Janekovic DStetter KO and Klenk HP (1983a) The archaebacte-rium Thermofilum pendens represents a novel genus of thethermophilic anaerobic sulfur respiring ThermoprotealesSyst Appl Microbiol 4 79ndash87
Zillig W Holz L Janekovic D Schaumlfer W and ReiterWD (1983b) The archaebacterium Thermococcus celerrepresents a novel genus within the thermophilic branch ofthe archaebacteria Syst Appl Microbiol 4 88ndash94