Comparing Alternative Approaches to Calculating Long

21
Comparing Alternative Approaches to Calculating Long- Run Incremental Cost Run Incremental Cost Bruno Fink

Transcript of Comparing Alternative Approaches to Calculating Long

Comparing Alternative Approaches to Calculating Long-Run Incremental CostRun Incremental Cost

Bruno Fink

1. Overview

1 Review of economic concepts

2 Total Service Long Run Incremental Cost (TSLRIC)

3 Total Element Long Run Incremental Cost (TELRIC)

4 Main differences and examples

5 Conclusions

1. Basic Concepts

• Multi-product firm

• Common Cost

• Incremental Cost▫ Total cost of production with A – total cost

without A (holding other outputs fixed)

• Long Run Incremental Cost

• Stand Alone Cost

2. TSLRIC• Based on product costs, not common

• Based on forward looking technology

2. TSLRIC

• Example:Products A and B, fixed cost F

TC = F + C + CTC = F + CA + CB

TSLRIC = LRIC of supplying A = CA

2. TSLRIC

• TSLRIC cost + product specific common costs = TSLRIC+

• Example:• Example:A and B again, F = fixed costs, FB are fixed costs for product B

TSLRIC+ of A = F + CA + CB – (FB + CB)

TSLRIC+ of A = CA + (F – FB)

3. TELRIC

• Total Element Long Run Incremental Cost comes from FCC in 1996

• Increase competition• Increase competition

• Facilitate element-by-element unbundling

• Few common costs

3. TELRIC

• Problems with element definition:“Access to the local exchange network when the transmission involves a long distance call…may not be an ‘element under the act’ even though call termination an ‘element under the act’ even though call termination service is an ‘element’”

• FCC has the power to apply TELRIC from the supreme court

Number of disputes before the courts. “supreme court opinion unequivocally procides authority to the FCC implement TELRIC pricing for unbundled network elements” But they also note the ambiguity in determining what is and what is not an ‘element’ under 96 telecom act. Example: Access to the local exchange network when the transmission involves a long distance call…may not be an ‘element under the act’ even though call termination service is an ‘element’

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+

• In TELRIC is difficult to say what is each element of the network

• In TSLRIC+ is difficult to calculate the common costs

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+

• Let’s go back to our example:

▫ Product A and B, with F▫ Now we have the elements X, Y, Z and its costs▫ Now we have the elements X, Y, Z and its costs▫ Let X be a link, Y and Z are switches▫ X is common cost for both services and always

needed▫ Y is used by A and B. In the long run Y could be

reduced with a one-third saving in costs.▫ Z is only for product B

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+• Let’s calculate the company LRIC:

F = CX + CY

CA = 0CB = CZCB = CZ

LRICA = CX+CY+CZ – [CX+⅔CY+CZ] = ⅓CY

LRICB= CX+CY+CZ - [CX+⅔CY] = ⅓CY+CZ

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+

• What is this company common costs?

CC = CX+CY+CZ – [LRICA–LRICB] = CX + ⅓CY

• Now we can go to the TSLRIC+ and TELRIC. However the telecom companies allocate common costs in minutes base, suppose the share of traffic is “s”.

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+

TSLRIC+B = LRICB + s.CC= s.CX + (1+s)⅓CY + CZX Y Z

TSLRIC+A = (1-s)CX + (2-s) ⅓CY

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+

• TELRIC: allocate costs on the basis of shares, does not consider the common costs.

• TELRIC = s.C + s.C + C• TELRICB= s.CX + s.CY + CZ

• TELRICA = (1-s)CX + (1-s)CY

• Comparing TSLRIC+B and TELRICB:▫ Considering CX=200 CY=100 CZ=100

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+

350

400

450

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1

TSLRIC+b

TELRICb

LRICb

4. TELRIC X TSLRIC+• Comparing TSLRIC+B and TELRICB:

▫ Considering CX=100 CY=200 CZ=100

350

400

450

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1

TSLRIC+b

TELRICb

LRICb

5. Conclusions

• TELRIC was right in 1996, but not anymore

• Defining each element is confusing• Defining each element is confusing

• TELRIC does not respect price floor or ceiling

5. Conclusions• What is the best approach?� TSLRIC+

• How to apply?

• Who is in charge of calculatingthe common costs?

5. Conclusions• Is it possible to calculate all the common costs?

▫ Bottom-up Approach▫ Top-Down Approach

• Most of the countries are trying to apply TSLRIC+

That’s All Folks!!That’s All Folks!!That’s All Folks!!That’s All Folks!!

Questions?

6. Main References

Gans, S. Joshua; King, Stephen P; “Comparing Alternative Approaches to Calculating Long-Run Incremental Cost”, 2004.

ICT Regulation Tool Kit; “Long-Run Incremental Cost Modeling”, http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/Section.2092.htmlModeling”, http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/Section.2092.html

Commerce Commision; “TSLRIC Reports and Submission” http://www.comcom.govt.nz/IndustryRegulation/Telecommunications/InterconnectionDeterminations/TotalServiceLongRunningIncrementalCost/submissions.aspx

New Zealand Commerce Commission; “Application of a TSLRIC Pricing Methodology – Discussion Paper: