F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~O H

C^i 1t3 1-tN

r - =; _-~ *sr,,;_.*:_==32=r- .:-==:

UOR*t ARItD R3CW&IC

PESI OF rim

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOFPRNT ASSOCIATION

TO THE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

ON A

PROPOSED CREDIT OF SDR 41.0 (US657.0 MILLION)

TO INDIA

FOR THE

-IPTH (BOMBAY AND MADRAS) POPULATION PROJECT

May 25. 1988

their offidial 1dte lt coetets may ot otewise be ihloes withu Word Bank adhwlm.atlo.

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

4

="a x t7"n

"ter (a) 3.28 feet (ft)1 kilometer (kmn) - 0. 62 miles

April 1 - March 31

BMC - M.nicipal Corporation of Greater BombayGOI - Goverrment of IndiaGTN - Government of Tamil ?FaduHP - Health PostIEC - Information, Education and CommunicationsMCH - Maternal and Child CareMIIES AManagement Information and Evaluation SystemMOHFW - Ministry of Health and Family WelfareBMC - Madras City Municipal CorporationMPW(F) - Multi-Purpose Worker (Female)PHD - Public Healt-' Depa::tmentPMP - Private MedChl PractitionerPVO - Private VolMeLtary Organization

£TITE(IUMAT AOD wmA~sAi POULTCEir** . .- . .... ...... ........ . .- .'. _ .!,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , . . ... . .. ..... ,__.. ... . .. .,. .: = . ,..,:. .... .._-

Uivy ndaetim bi It fta . __

GoYer ut of T_mil Nadu, adra City AkloipalCorporation (MC), and Municipal Corporation of GreaterBombay (NC).

Aount: SDR 41.0 million (US$57.0 million equivalent)

Teriss: Standard, vith 35 years maturity.

On-lendin_ Ters: Government of India (GOI) to Tanil Nadu and Maharashtr:In accordance with standard arrangemwnts for developmentassistance to States for the development of family welfareprojects on terms and conditions applicable at the time(funds for MMC and BMC to be passed on by the respectiveStates). At present, central assistance for family welfareLs provided on a grant basis.

Local Foreign Total----- US$ Million -

EinanciLglsn: IDA 52.74 4.26 57.00GOI 21.21 21.21

..... ~ .... . .

Total Project Cost 73.95 4.26 78.21 *

* Including Taxes and Duties of US$1.31 million.

Economic Rate ofRet Not applicable

Staff AM&raisalReport: Report No. 7077-IN: dated May 25, 1988

M8S: IBRD Nos. 20507, 20508, 20509.

This docunent ha 1 restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the perfonuanceof their official dutie. Its contents may not otherwise be discaond without World Bank authorition.

RANDDAD RATIO OF TME NInZSETOF THE INTERATIOKAL D OEWPtDT AUSOCLTIOI

ON A PROPOSED CRIT TO MIA FM THE

1. The following 0000oraru and recomerdation on a proposed develo_mnt- - ;t6t -J. I. - t - ee * ( . - =A

is submitted for appreal. The proposed credit ould be on stamet ID trermvith 35 yars maturity and help flane a popul.tion proj*ct in tho MNucpal-- *' ' ' tpratt,a -t fA @ruur -(USC) * Cue l;v As osdt(MC), and the Chingleput district of the State of Tamil Nedu.

2. Backgroun India's urban population is expected to grow from 160million in 1981 to 320 million in 2000, or from about a quarter to a third ofthe total population. The Government of India (GOI) is faced with now issuesin urban social development and in exploring ways to ensure that the expandingurban population has access to affordable and good quality social services.GOI's Family Welfare Program, which includes family planning and maternal andchild health (MCH) services has had a predominantly rural orientation, but nowneeds to make better provision for urban slum populations. Vital rates forurban slum populations are substantially higher and contraceptive prevalencerates significantly lower than those for non-slum populations. In Bombay andMadras, contraceptive prevalence in the slums is abc-ut 250 while it is over 604among the middle and upper classes. Infant mortality rates in slum areasaverage about 100 per 1,000 live births as against about 20 for the non-slumpopulation. Given the relatively easier atccess to health facilities comparedto rural areas, the presence of more private health institutions in urbanareas, and the availability of information on the mass media, these slum ratesare unacceptable.

3. The demand for contraception by the urban slum dweller appears to beconstrained not only by limited access to service facilities and poverty, butalso by low levels of understanding and knowledge of modern contraception,particularly of temporary methods. To overcome these constraints, the familywelfare program has to develop a pattern of service delivery based onconveniently located fixed facilities that will provide a wider range ofaffordable services, and also serve as a base for out each activities. Thedevelopment of strong outreach programs is essential and a necessary complimentto infrastructural development, if family welfare services are to be expandedat a rate and on a scale that is both replicable and sustainable by Government.In slum areas, outreach programs will have to concentrate on establishingeffective communication and contact with the target populations among the poor,particularly eligible couples, mothers, and young children. Because familywelfare services are essentially promotive rather than curative, and areconsidered of national importance in India, expenditures incurred by the Statesare met entirely by GOI. In addition, only nominal fees or charges are leviedagainst beneficiaries who utilize public sector health and family welfareservice facilities.

4. vbn a.~Z a sporftefd ale" 1R7S, lbmain slemnt of 001's family welfare strategy: a o.w4utration of . rvtWcdelivery in rural areas a31A backward itricts bae on tbe Mo"el PI=l or AreaProjacts Schem. Towards that &in, IDA ha firaned tor population projectsfor a total of US$188.2 million. The cmo_n objectivs of tae projects haveben to rOWcc fertility mid rlity in aslseot rr4 diotriets. 2ke first

have also included statewide activftl&s. The first project was cloaed in 1980and the socond in :Xarch 1908. Although pwoscts hav been gnerally well-tmlmst4 sad .cU.ap i*. eewen+ _eAe)q.ir- -. ~slower than planned, with both projects being fully dLsbursed In about sevenyears. The lesso"s learned so far from these projects are that: (a) improvLngthe quality and management of family welfare facilities is a critical factor ininfluencing the demand for servlces; (b) an analysis of local demographiccharacteristics and famlly planning preferences is a prerequilite to developingrealistic targets and services; and (c) the participation of local comunftLes,the private sector and other non-governmantal organizations must be encouragedif the GOI's efforts to extend the family welfare program are to be succersful.

5. Rationale for IDA Involvement. Recognizing the problems associatedwith a rapidly growing urban population, the GOI has recently broadened itsstrategy to address family welfare needs in cities, particularly focusing onlow-income families. In 1985, the Urban Revamping Scheme, which aims tostrengthen the delivery of family welfare services to poor urban areas, wasinitiated. IDA supports this initiative fully. Improving the health status ofthe urban poor as well as their access to information and services contributesto the improvement of the human environment and to the ameliorationi of urbanpoverty. The reduction of fertility rates in urban, as well as rural,populations is also an IDA priority. The project is a pioneering one for IDAand the first to deal with urban popula.ion issues in India. It takes accountof the lessons of earlier projects, and aims to assist the Government indeveloping a replicable model for its policies and programs designed to moeetthe specific needs of the urban poor.

6. Proiect Objectives. The proposed project would be located in SMC,MMC, and the Chingleput district in Tamil Nadu with the focus on slumcommunities. The objectives of the project would be to (a) support the UrbanRevamping Scheme in the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BMC), theMadras City Municipal Corporation (MKC) and the Chingleput district in TamilNadu; (b) assist in strengthening the institutional capacity of Tamil Nadu, BMCand MMC to deliver family welfare services, particularly to the poor sectionsof urban communities; (c) improve the quality of family welfare services beingdelivered in BMC, MMC and Chingleput; and (d) increase the participation ofPrivate Voluntary Organizations (PVOs) and Private Medical Practitioners (PMPs)in the delivery of family welfare services in poor urban areas of BMC, MMC andChingleput.

7. Project Description The proposed project would include thefollowing components: Service Delivery ExRansion: through the construction of

ir 4 cr .-. -i:<.;.? . .* 4' fi f3 :/. ., .-f SM Et1'i.-A ; .* -W>v t

- ~~~~3.

I new end/or n * rWiw of ixiatig f.tl tit tX 4ete 6dItismAl 11i4ft Vt*

(HPs); and the strengthening of counity-based outrech sorvices to improvematernity ears, child referral s.rvlees, an the me of mnoSm o.etrso.ptives,including an esphasis on temporary methoIs and child spacing for appropriately

gedsuples. gs _ -- - : throuh e l, s l atanA&edal pro- and in-service training of 8.000 family welfare staff in NW

=.5:~ ~ ~~~lt-t ilvl-m ,+: i; hp* t _m _! m,,,,w ',',, _,

reorganizing and strengthening the omnagemnt of feily wilftr prograzimpleontation In Temil Nadu, Bombay and Nadras. In Bomay, a Contral

a ~:Cootd!naging off*icen d~ Ysz:ri[1y Velfa*. ureaus would be eitiSliui8 itn the Public Health Department, while in Tamil Nadu, Stering and EmpoweredComittees under the chairmanship of the Chief Secretary would be established,and the State and MMC Directorates of Family Welfare would be strengthened.These institutions would develop capacities to design and implement ManagementInformation and Evaluation Systems (MIES) as well as Information, Education andCommunications (TEC) programs. Increasing Private Voluntary Organizations(PVOs) and Private Hedical Practitioner (PMP) Rartici2atiot3: through assistingPVOs to operate Health Posts (HPs), devolving Female Voluntary Health Workertraining and selected IEC activities to PVOs, supporting innovative familywelfare provision schemes of PVOs, and providing upgrading training and Lioderncontraceptive supplies to private medical practitioners.

8. The total project cost is estimated at US$78.21 million; the proposedIDA Credit of US$5/.0 million equivalent would cover about 74% of costs net oftaxes incluling all foreign costs and 71% of the local costs. GOI wouldfinance the remaining US$19.90 million and all taxes and duties. A breakdownof costs and the financing plan are shown in Schedule A. Amounts and methods ofprocurement and of disbursements, and the disbursement schedule are shown inSchedule B. A timetable of key processing events and the status tf Bank Groupoperations in India are given in Schedules C and D. Maps are also attached.The Staff Appraisal Report, No. 7077-IN dated May 25, 1988 is distributedseparately.

9. A;red Actions. Tamil Nadu, BMC and MNC have already: (a) appointedProject Directors and Coordinators; and (b) instituted suitable arrangementsfor PVO development and operation of Health Posts. IDA, Tamil Nadu, MKC andBIIC have also agreed to the following: (a) staff for the effective implemen-tation of family welfare outreach programs and for the strengthening of familywelfare program administration would be appointed and maintained at levels andon a schedule acceptable to IDA; (b) annual plans, timetables and schedules forthe construction of Health Posts, IEC programs, staff training, and monitoringand evaluation activities would be prepared and submitted to IDA by January 31of each year; (c) the completion and review with IDA of assessments ofbeneficiary needs and the training requirements of private medicalpractitioners by March 31, 1989 and baseline surveys by June 30, 1989; and (d)a formal mid-term review of project progress by December 31, 1992, includingmonitorable benchmarks on which to assess progress.

10. Benefits. The proposed project will assist the GOI in developinga replicable model for service delivery in urban slum areas. It will also

.4

boed"L ab.st 2.5 m&UL.L. Law.Iinsvems MAnd k4UWo b £) *UAthe e 7i ;s abU1 faly u lawing ser is a, lairig to inareasadoontra tive use oa for tility decline; A (b) iuplroYir, the uality offaftiy plamigg wA materntty sn"'i.is, uMuludti outrtic proUs forprel eal euti 1 "re, tw reduas morbidity and .tlity amon mthors

ability of ma.eil paJ. wrent. to 1i esnt th. proejct, partioularly to4.velou marea bgrios and Vork **I abatL ith lis. TO minimitts" rlai, th i z-pect1i e faiy wit t e iiie The il a j , 1

and MMC will be appropriately strength and arr e mnte instituted forimproving the cooperation between the State pvovrrmnt, munIcipalities andPVOs.

12. R*eomaSndntioj. I am satinfied that the proposed credit wouldcomply with the Articles of Agreement of the Associat.on; and recommend thatthe Exacutive Directors approve the proposal.

Barber B. ConablePresident

Attachments

Washington D.C.May 25, 1988

- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~77~,7

7~~~~~$

zir~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Service Delivery Extpansiont 37.70 2.33 40.03Quality Improvwnt (Training) 2.91 0.34 3.25Management Improvement 10.52 0.56 11.08PVO and Private PractitionerParticip %tion 5.66 0.35 6.01

Tgtal bass Cost 56b79~ La I=

Phy.sical Contingencies 3.90 0.35 4.25

Price Contingencies 13.26 0.33 13.59

Ia"L Prjectu CostL73.9 A/

Einancing la

IDA 52.74 4.26 57. 00 hI/GOI 21.21 - 21.21

Total 7395 AUk 782

A/ Including taxes and duties of US$1.31 million equivalent.

la/ Including US$1.0 million for retroactive financing of expendituresincurred after November 1, 1987.

.4. Ob_ NA l CL

civil works and professional tees 7.38 1.06 8.44Furniture 1.22 1.22zquipment ead books 2.0 3.64 5.64Vehicles 0.71 0.71Local consultanto 2.85 2.85Fellowships 1.89 1.89incremental staff417 416Salaries417 4.6

Consumable materi&ld 12.15 12.150&M costs 3.55 3.5

2.0 28.65 1.06 46.50 78.21

Disbursement % of expenditures

CiLtatoxx ~ ~ ~ ~ (tS$m)to be disbursed

civil works and professional fees 7.18 12.6 85%Furniture 1.04 1.8 100% of CIF andEquipment, ICB 1.70 3.0 ex-tactory or 85%Equipment, LCB 3.00 5.4 of goods purchased

otherwise.Local consultants/fellowships 4.74 8.3 100%Salaries of additio-nal staff 28.11 49.4 Average 67.2% onConsumable materials and 0&( costs 10.54 18.5 declining scale

Estiate Dibursae=et

Annual 1.66 5.08 8.19 10.53 10.64 9.28 8.02 3.60Cumulative 1.66 6.74 14.Q3 25.46 36.10 45.38 53.40 57.00

….. . . . . . . .Note: Closing Date: December 31, 1995./A Not applicable./~Declining scale - FY89 at 100%, FY90/91 at 90%, FY92 at 80%, FY93 at

70%, FY94 at 60%, and FY95 at 45%.

. . : q.'.,

(b) ?r.peue7 '7M .. ': ' . f'.mft~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A

(c) First Bank/IDA Mission :February 1985

(d) Appraisal Kission Departure November 12, 1987

(e) Negotiations May 3-9, 1983

(f) Planned Date of Effectiveness August 1988

(g) List of Relevant PCRs and PPARS India: First Population Project(Credit 312-IN)Project Performance Audit ReportNo. 3748

w,- F -f- P- -72 ¢ ____ - -; -; -7T.. - ;

~~~~*~~--: :. t _ _r.y :-*-"i-r----t6s't2,_i.--..,-t. +r -r nr .-.- -x-:-^'t-~<hr!... .;--

- ' - - n . --- , - *...... - , :. _ -. .. .... . - , ': i-

_: S S S -^ ___ _w_____P_ a __

i~~~~~~--- @-.,r > - -$ r .

3 1 ~ OW",~~~~~~~~~~~~ WNi-

1648-IN 1979 damaludadm Thenmal Power 50.0 I .8"96)-IN 1980 Inland Fisheries - 20.0 3.689811N M90 Population II - 46.0 4.931003-IN 1980 Tamil aeduI Nutrition - 32.0 4.341011-IN 1980 -ujarat Irrigation II - 175.0 34.501012-IN 1980 CashI wnut - 22.0 7.151027-In 1980 Singrauli Thermal - 300.0 19.151034-IN 1980 Karnataka Sericulture - 54.0 5.711046-IN 1980 Rajasthan Water Supply I Sewerage - 80.0 22.841053-IN 1980 Farakka Theml Paver - 225.0 10.821887-IN 1980 Farakka Thermal Power 25.0 - 25.001897-IN 1981 Kandi Watershed and

Area Development 30.0 - 6.801072-IN 1981 Bihar Rural Roads - 35.0 4.331078-IN 1981 Mahanadi Barrages - 83.0 13.341082-IN 1981 Madras Urban Development II - 42.0 4.541108-IN 1981 H.P. Medium Irrigation - 140.0 31.211116-IN 1981 Karnataka Tank Irrigation - 54.0 12.261125-IN 1981 Hazira Fertilizer Project - 399.1 24.5E1138-IN 1981 M.P. Agricultural Ext. II - 37.0 11.311146-IN 1981 National Cooperative

Development Corp. II - 125.0 8.401172-IN 1982 Korba Thermal Power Project II - 400.0 109.171177-IN 1982 Hadtaya Pradesh KajOr Irrigation - 220.0 1lO.421178-IN 1S32 West Bengal Social Forestry - 29.0 14.661185-IN 1982 Kanpur Urban Development - 25.0 4.552076-IN 1982 Ramagundam Ihermal Power II 300.0 - 115.761219-IN 1982 Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Ext. - 6.0 2.592123-IN 1982 lefineries Rationalization 200.0 - 8.362165-IN 1982 Rural Electrification III 304.5 - 32.731269-IN 1982 Kallada Irrigation - 60.0 3.742186-I5 1.982 K1lal4 Irigation 20.3 - 15.471280-IN 1983 Cujarat Water Supply - 72.0 S8.121286-IN 1983 Jaeu/Kasbhir and

Haryana Social Forestry - 33.0 17.901288-IN 1983 Chambal Madhya Pradesh

Irrigation II - 31.0 10.031289-IN 1983 Subernarekha Irrigation - 127.0 49.862205-IN 1983 Krishna-Godavari Exploration 165.5 - 30.181299-IN 1983 Railways Modernization &

Maintenance II - 200.0 35.85'JI63- -A&UNO.iuNnce IIat 20. - 197.04

Maintenance II 200.0 -197.04

*..~~~~~~~~~~t~. .Lose or Pisesl (yet of Cmellations

Po. *PoVAL Pur!or IDA I/ Umidsbmrin 2/

2241-1 2 192 htb Gasi e vwloptmen 1).3 - 1iM

: 1)83 133 V.?. Ie:s t^dI 11 -. -& 5A

=330C 18 -sIt U 1U - 187. 2*la r *Z83-- - 198 ti~alXW;=!- g --= h>. ?wea&ae <-ra - rf2!-r -2)1.9

1383-IN 193 Maharashtra Moter Utilization - 32.0 18.822308-IN 1983 Maharashtra Water Utilization 22.7 - 22.642329-IN 1983 Madhya PradesL Urbin 24.1 - 13.891397-IN 1984 Orissa Irrigation II - 105.0 54.351424-IN 1984 Rainfed Areas Watershed Dev. - 31.0 37.591426-IN 1984 Population III - 70.0 59.401432-IN 1984 Karnataka Social Forestry - 27.0 18.222387-IN 1984 Nhava Sheva Port 250.0 - 129.622393-IN 1984 Dudhichua Coal 151.0 - 107.342403-IN 1984 Cambay Basin Petroleum 242.5 - 176.682415-IN 1984 Madhya Pradesh Fertilizer 203.6 - 77.631454-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 36.5 34.96SF-12-IN 1984 Tamil Nadu Water Supply - 36.5 48.971468-IN 1984 Periyar Vaigai II Irrigation - 17.5 2.46SF-16-IN 1984 Periyar Vaigai II Irrigation - 17.5 18.471483-IN 1984 Upper Canga Irrigation - 125.0 136.871496-IN 1984 Cujarat Medium Irrigation - 172.0 144.882416-IN 1984 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric 157.4 - 152.58SF-20-IN 1984 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 129.8 168.542417-IN 1984 Railways Electrification 280.7 - 207.502442-IN 1984 Farskka II Thermal Power 300.8 - 270.092452-IN 1984 Fourth Trombay Thermal Power 135.4 - 71.081502-IN 190'4 National Cooperative

Development Corporation III - 220.0 231.701514-IN 1985 Kerala Social Forestry - 31.8 29.771523-IN 1985 National Agric. Extension I - 39.1 47.691544-IN 1985 Bombay Urban Development - 138.0 156.612497-IN 1985 Narmada (Cu -rat) Dam and Power 200.0 - 200.001552-IN 1985 Narmada (Cu,_:.at) Dam and Power - 100.0 110.571553-IN 1985 Narmada (Gujarat) Canal - 150.0 187.561569-IN 1985 Second National Agricultural Ext. - 49.0 51.881611-IN 1985 National Social Forestry - 165.0 183.581613-IN 1985 Indira Sarovar Hydroelectric - 13.2 17.202498-IN 1985 Jharia Coking Coal 248.0 - 215.452505-IN 1985 Maharashtra Petrochemical 300.0 - 114.822534-IN 1985 Second National Highway 200.0 - 176.382544-IN 1985 Chandrapur Thermal Power 300.0 - 254.752555-IN 1985 Rihand Power Transmission 250.0 - 164.642582-IN 1985 Kerala Power 176.0 - 174.191619-IN 1986 West Bengal Minor Irrigation - 99.0 139.971621-IN 1986 Maharashtra Composite Irrigation - 160.0 219.191622-IN 1986 Kerala Water Supply and Sanitation - 41.0 52.531623-IN 1986 West Bengal Population - 51.0 64.281631-IN 1986 National Agricultural Rasesrch II - 72.1 86.092629-IN 1986 Industrial Export Dev. Finance 90.0 - 78.44

4.,. .4M *:1'--*,rw--t

-10O- SohdwI .

Us$ millionLoan or FiLcal .ata ofCanellatios)-Ciedit T"w ofno, AusroAL PIro SD 3/ U jbi.4 2

2430-ZN IG ZCZCZ-Xadis, ap. Bve. Pimen 240.0 - 142.051643-lU 19W Sujast - 20 75723453-11 1986 S m I s7l.o 114.4534O-JM 1994 C9!~ss Zad tery S145.0 111.782441-ZN I 191 !TtY --UiIdt 1ui8Utty ff .t- - - - 1ST - -1645-13 1it" Fdhia Pradeak II Zuwigation - 140.0 104.0243-IN 19S LAdhar ?tsIdh tI Irription 131.0 - 131.0O2674-ZV IPGr CobbihL4 Cydtt lto 6 MA.O * 29.0tI2729-IN 1950 Cooperative Fortiliser 150.2 - 45.522730-IN 196N Cooperative Fortilimr 152.0 - 89.211737-1N 1987 Bihar Tubewells - 66.0 70.432769-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply &

Sewerage III 40.0 - 40.001750-IN 1987 Bombay Water Supply &

Sewerage III - 145.0 136.321754-IN 1987 National Agric. Extension III - 65.0 98.291757-IN 1987 Cujarat Rural Roads - 119.6 133.671770-IN 1987 National Water Management - 114.0 120.782785-IN 1987 Oil Irdia Petroleum 140.0 - 131.862796-IN 1987 Coal Mining & Quality Tmprovement 340.0 - 285.542813-IN 1987 Tolecoinunications IX 345.0 - 345.002797-IN 1987 Uttar Pradesh Urban Development 20.0 - 20.001780-IN 1987 Uttar Pradesh Urban Development - 130.0 141.062827-IN 1987 Karnataka Pover* 330.0 - 330.002844-IN 1987 National Capital Power 485.0 - 485.002845-IN 1987 Talcher Thermal 375.0 - 375.002846-IN 1987 Madras Water Supply 53.0 - 53.00

1822-IN 1987 Madras Water Supply - 16.0 17.342886-IN 1966 Drought Assistance 150.0 - 94.72

1852-IN 1988 Drought Assistance - 200.0 37.532893-IN 1988 National Dairy I1* 200.0 - 200.001859-IN 1988 National Dairy II* - 160.0 168.14

Total 12,485.5 15,005.2of which has been repaid 1 855.9 377.1

Total now outstanding 10,829.6 14,628.1Amount Sold 133.8of which has been repaid 133.8 - -

Total nov hold by Bank and IDA 3/ 10,829.i 14,628.1

Total undisbursed (excluding *) 6,522.31 4,350.01

1/ IDA Credit amounts for 5DB-donominated Credits are expressed in terms of theirUS dollar equivalents, as established at the time of Credit negotiations and assubsequently presented to the Board.

2/ Undisbureod amounts for SDR-denominated IDA Credits are derived from cumulativedisbureemonts converted to their US dollar equivalents at the SDR/US dollar exchangerate in effect on March 31, 1988, while original principal is based on the exchangerate in offect at negotlutions. This accounts for the fact that in come cases, theundisbursed balance as shown in US$ equivalent is higher than the original principal.

3/ Prior to exchange adjustmnt.

* Not yet effective.

: L 0 | ' S 33UL ' 0

- 11- Page 4 of 4

B. STATUIZIT OF IFC IESIIUU(As oL Wetc 31, IN)-

Fiscal Amount (UO million)Year Gn Lon Equity Total

1959 leublic ForSe Cmpay Ltd*. 1.5 - 1.51959 Kirlosar Oil Engin Ltd. 0.8 - 0.8-9 ba m, *tieutt Ltd. 1.4 1 .4

1941 .S.B. Pues Ltd. 0.2 - 0.21943-4 Preciuioe Bearias lIdis Ltd. 0.6 0.4 1.0194 Port teeter 1.iJtrtre Ltd. 0.8 0.4 1.21964-75-79 Nahindra Ugine Steel Co. Ltd. 11.8 1.3 13.11964 Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. 1.0 0.3 1.31967 Jayshree Chemicals Ltd. 1.1 0.1 1.21967 Indian Explosives Ltd. 8.6 2.9 11.51969-70 Zuari Agro-Chemicals Ltd. 15.2 3.8 19.01976-87 Escorts Limited 15.9 - 15.91978 Housing Development Finance Corp. 4.0 1.6 5.61980 Deepak Fertilizer and

Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. 7.5 1.2 8.71981 Coromandel Fertilizers Limited 15.9 - 15.91981-86 Tata Iron and Steel Company Ltd. 52 4 - 52.41981 Mahindra, Mahindra Limited 15.0 - 15.01981 Magarjuna Coated Tubes Ltd. 1.5 0.3 1.81981-86/87 Nagarjuna Signode Limited 2.3 0.3 2.61981 Nagarjuna Steels Limited 3.5 0.2 3.71982 Ashok Leyland Limited 28.0 - 28.01982 The Bombay Dyeing and

Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 18.8 - 18.81982 Bharat Forge Company Ltd. 15.9 - 15.91982 The Indian Rayon Corp. Ltd. 14,6 - 14.61984-86 The Cvalior Rayon Silk Manu-

facturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. 16.0 - 16.01985 Bihar Sponge 16.7 0.7 17.41985 Bajaj Auto Ltd. 23.9 - 23.91985 Modi Cement 13.2 - 13.21985 India Lease Development Ltd. 5.0 0.3 5.31986 Larsen and Toubro Ltd. 21.8 - 21.81986 India Equipmnt Leasing Ltd. 2.5 0.4 2.91986 Bajaj Tempo Limited 30.5 - 30.51986 The Great Eastern Shipping

Company Ltd. 8.0 2.0 10.01987 Cujarat armada Valley Fertilizer 38.9 - 38.91987 Hero Honda Motors Ltd. 7.9 - 7.91987 Wimco Limited 4.7 - 4.71987 Titan Watches Limited 15.6 0.4 16.01987 Export-Import Bank of India 15.0 - 15.01987 Cujarat Fusion Class Ltd. 7.5 1.7 9.21987 The Cujarat Rural Housing

Finance Corp. - 0.2 0.21987 Hindustan Motors Ltd. 40.5 - 40.5

TOTAL GROSS COOEITI4ETS 506.0 18.5 524.5

Less: Cancellations, Terminations,Repayments and Sales 291.6 8.0 299.6

Now Held 214.4 10.5 224.9

~~~~~* . ,*-4as ;- 4 7 4 ---- * XL * m %s.;t F * t- N °1~w /..,.

PAIOSTAUd''*N~PJPUNJAA r~~ CHINA

UTTAO PRADESH i/9HUTAN"-

RAJASTHAN

-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

,~~, ..-, ~ ~ t S1MAR (BANGLADESH

* 0i UTTAt *MADDHYA PRADESH

<

4 I ' i- - ORISSA

a.. _- M^H^R^sH * MAHARASH4TRA

*BOMBAY r INDIA

POPULATION_ Hydwarbod PONDICHRY PROJECTS

*- ANDHPROJECTSHRA

PRADESH pih (Bombaiy - modfa)Popuk.l- Pro,ec

Penji.lGOA I Popubtion Pect IV Pret Dinrt,c

-_ _ io hqeA Pr1e 1 Ul e IProjec At.om (OngnW

%MADRAS PWOpen Prje I P.In AreaKAINATAKA __ - * Cnpkl d Dede 31, 11910

.' Beau

TAMIL NADU MpND HERR -p 1 t

*r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ t - -~~~~~~~~~Dkid d udws

KfRALA, - - -ftS n Union Tuoihy

SI Due to ecuI cofsiulorellon some erem couWdSRI w be Pinudd in I1 mnep we test for cn

LANKA kt4in Uw a"m a* fts " -r__~ ,~~ ~ _- w" _n

S"__S__.m_sS r__

P_ t W

JANUARt 19M

__________________________ IBRO 20508~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~BR 25

CHINA- - -- 7AFlo w j Bi - 0X i 1 iU ; :7N PROJECT

INDIA ,S /-. ,r,,;, V ts< Cr,ek - ^- __4=B&:_W'

SfA - , - - n_- .... _JWT.

_ <,fq- 5 - 5 o*z-E/9 , r/!~ a-3

2rA 2-f K 63 -Q, -ET°-H

N ATIONZAL AK ,_ i <\ /

T=_~~~~~~~ aSS f > > i Q S 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A iA

s 12 . _ . ._ ~~~~-, __DS ,_

.P~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 10At ?

P.KISlft4AN ,UMIt I N D I A

FIFTH (BOMBAY - MADRAS) POPULATION PROJECTS t (' INDIA 14 CITY OF MADRAS, TOWNSHIPS AND MUNICIPALITIES

BAY OF

OFNGA&;

LANKA

_ . :i5 5ZNgA .;~/ (,.

.. 3<.. -( .K > 0 t

.130

r."D X 1' i,f l�:ll!

z -L - _ > % / > X > / n j ; 4 .w j a,

MANAU _ LX "