Preference simulation and preference programming: robustness issues in priority derivation
CHANGE STYLE PREFERENCE - AUCD
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
2 -
download
0
Transcript of CHANGE STYLE PREFERENCE - AUCD
Navigating Change Presented by:
Angela Rosenberg Contact Angela @
www.insideoutenneagram.com
8/12/2016 Inside Out 1
©2003 Discovery Learning, Inc. All
Rights Reserved.
https://www.discoverylearning.com/store/a
ssessments/change-style-indicator/
When approaching “changes” or dealing with situations involving change I…
I am ready to change things! Prefer the status quo Am dissatisfied with the status quo
Feel threatened Enjoy uncertainty Honor traditional ways of doing things
Can balance all perspectives Say…”Why change it?” Can see both sides of an issue
Like to challenge the existing structure Am practical and make it workable Am reluctant to take a risk
Am conventional Think : “It depends” Like unexplored risk
Like to preserve what is Ask others and get consensus Say, “What are the pro’s and con’s to
changing it?”
Think, “Let’s wait awhile” Like to make change happen…take big leaps Respond best to baby steps…incremental
change
Say…”Why not change it?” Move forward Am often middle of the road
Am predictable Am visionary Am unconventional and spontaneous
Just say “no”…at least at first Feel stuck… Just DO IT!
Compromise Am often indecisive Am often non-committal
# RED # BLUE # GREEN
Change style preference is
–A dimension of our personality
–Consistent over time
–A pre-determined, neurologically-based aspect of personality
When facing change…. Work of W. Christopher Musslewhite, Ed.D, Dangerous Opportunity: Making Change Work, 2004
CSI: Change Style Indicator
https://www.discoverylearning.com/store/assessment
s/change-style-indicator/
CSI Slides and Descriptors Adapted & Used ©2003
Discovery Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Change Style Indicator ®
A Discovery Learning Product
CHANGE STYLE INDICATOR® CSI DOES: CSI DOES NOT:
Offer an explanation of preferred style of initiating and dealing with
change
Describe three change style preferences that are more personality influenced than situationally influenced
Create an appreciation for change-style diversity
Present a right or wrong, “better” or “worse” change style
Measure level of competence at initiating and managing change
Limit individuals to predetermined responses to change
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CHANGENavigating Change STYLE PREFERENCE
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PRAGMATISTS
Explore the
structure
Prefer change
that is
functional
CONSERVERS
Accept the
structure
Prefer change
that is
incremental
ORIGINATORS
Challenge the
structure
Prefer change
that is
expansive
• Resist changing the environment?
• Question why change without discussion?
• Question what is wrong with the current situation?
• Wonder about rationale….?
• Need and seek clarity?
• Express interest and enthusiasm for a change?
What was your response to the proposed office c
CHANReflect on Your “Response” to Change… hange(s)?
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CHARACTERISTICS
When facing change CONSERVERS
Prefer change that maintains current structure
May operate from conventional assumptions
Enjoy predictability
May appear cautious and inflexible
Honor tradition and established practice
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CHARACTERISTICS
A Strategic Plan
CONSERVERS are likely to
Work within the current structural or organizational framework
Change based upon the current mission and goals using incremental short term goals
Appreciate continued partnerships and working relationships
Move forward with caution with
particular awareness of: swoT Honor tradition and established
practices
CHARACTERISTICS When facing change ORIGINATORS
Prefer change that challenges current structure
Will likely challenge accepted assumptions
Enjoy risk and uncertainty
May appear as visionary and systemic in their thinking
Can treat accepted policies and procedures with less regard
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CHARACTERISTICS A Strategic Plan
ORIGINATORS are likely to Change the current structure of the
organization
Question the accepted way of doing things—move away from status quo
Proceed despite risk and uncertainty
swot
Envision a new model and goals for the future
Envision new plans regardless of contrasting policies and procedures
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CHARACTERISTICS When facing change
PRAGMATISTS
Prefer change that emphasizes workable outcomes
Are more focused on results than structure
Are open to both sides of an argument
May take more of a middle-of-the-road approach
Appear more team-oriented
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
CHARACTERISTICS A Strategic Plan
PRAGMATISTS are likely to
Focus upon workable outcomes and be open to both sides of an argument
Weigh benefits and risks before drafting
SWot
Seek and act upon team/community input
Include multiple options for review before sign-off
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PERCEPTIONS ORIGINATORS see CONSERVERS as:
Dogmatic
Bureaucratic
Yielding to authority
Preferring the status quo
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PERCEPTIONS CONSERVERS see ORIGINATORS as:
Impulsive
Lacking appreciation of tested ways
of getting things done
Starting but not finishing projects
Wanting change for the sake of
change
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PERCEPTIONS PRAGMATISTS can be perceived by strong
CONSERVERS and ORIGINATORS as:
Compromising
Indecisive
Easily influenced
Noncommittal
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ORGANIZATION
Respect for routine and rules
LEADERSHIP STYLE
Practical realities
Expect cooperation
Promote tradition and values
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Style Summary
Conservers
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ORGANIZATION
Encourage and Foster cooperation
LEADERSHIP STYLE
Use past experiences to solve current problems
Build cooperation
Facilitative
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Style Summary
Pragmatists
CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ORGANIZATION Encourage risk LEADERSHIP STYLE Long range vision Reorganize system Organize simultaneous tasks
©2003 Discovery Learning,
Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Style Summary
Originators
Questions for Assessing Situational Appropriateness of Change Style
How many solutions have been tried already?
How critical is time?
How limited are resources?
How critical is the situation?
How long has the team worked together?
Are politics playing a part in the situation or decision?
Who is requesting the change?
Is the client a conserver, a pragmatist, or an originator?
In what stage of development is the project?
Has the competition changed?
©2003 Discovery Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The KEY: To Understand and Use the Change Language of Others
• A child with a neurodevelopmental disability
• A sibling, parent, and/or care-partner
• Community partners
• Interdisciplinary team members
• Colleagues
• Policy makers
Insideoutenneagram.com
Talking Change CONSERVERs PRAGMATISTs ORIGINATORs
“Let’s take this slowly” “Let’s be flexible and consider options”
Why not get “ahead of the curve”
“One step at a time---what feels comfortable to you?”
“What do you think? Why don’t we check in with-----to get their opinion”
“Visionary new idea!”
“Let’s think about it…” “What about this plan--?” “Will this schedule work for you?”
“Think about the possibility”
“What have you done in the past….?”
“Let’s handle …..like this! I’m on it!”
“New!” “Exciting!”
“Maybe we can try ‘this’ first and see how it ‘feels’ (‘works’) and then decide
“Let me list some pro’s and con’s” “Why wait? Let’s get started!”
“Maybe we can do this part---and leave the rest as it is…”
“Based on what I’ve read” “After looking at a number of websites”
“We can set up details later….Let’s move forward—not look backward”
Change= Event + Emotion
• Change is the event
• Emotion is the psychological process
• Human reactions: fear, anxiety, anger
Create a Readiness Culture
“We know changes are
coming, but we are not ready.”
Fear
“We know about the changes and
are prepared”
Ready to Go
“
We didn’t expect the changes and
are unready”
Chaos
“We are prepared for impending
changes.”
At the Ready
UNPREPARED PREPARED
UN
EX
PE
CT
ED
E
XP
EC
TE
D
“A Leader without Followers in Just a Person Out for a long Walk….. “
Linda Lopez, Former AZ State Senator
University of Arizona Leader Intensive Panel
8/12/2016 39
Creating a Collective Readiness Culture
KNOWING the
WHY
“We know about the changes and
are prepared”
Ready to Go
KNOWING the
WHY
“We are prepared for impending
changes.”
At the Ready
PREPARED for CHANGE
UN
EX
PE
CT
ED
E
XP
EC
TE
D
Exploring the “WHY”
The WHY is the Belief that underlies everything you
“do”—
How and what you do means little without a unified
Vision
A clear sense of WHY sets Expectations
“Your” WHY is what makes your program
Unique
Sinek, S. Start with Why, 2009 41
• WHY • WHY
• We are here to train and prepare a Diverse Inter-professionalClinical Workforce
• We are the Future of Public Health and Support the MCHB Goals for Diversity & Cultural Competence
HOW: HOW:
HOW:
HOW:
WHY?
Diversity
Packet of Resources
Please visit the AUCD Website:
2016 Joint Meeting Selected Topical Resources: Navigating Change, Diversity, Decision Making and Strategic Planning
Including: Websites, TED Talks, Slide Presentations, Worksheets, Discussion Handouts and Other Resources
www.insideoutenneagram.com
“Nothing Endures but Change” My Thanks to: The Joint Training Meeting Planning Committee for their confidence in me, time, and insights in developing the learning goals for this “virtual” meeting My Colleagues at the University of Arizona LEND for allowing me the honor of joining them as they continue to develop to grow a robust interprofessional leadership program The UNC MCH Leadership Consortium faculty with whom I continue to collaborate and share interprofessional leadership insights The Interprofessional Leadership Learning Collaborative faculty for their collective insights and dedication to sharing leadership strategies The Maternal and Child Health Bureau and AUCD for their ongoing support in developing National models of leadership training Marty Rosenberg…my favorite “Conserver” for allowing me to tell his story
To Ben Kaufman for his invitation to me to facilitate this meeting and his leadership and organization throughout the planning and delivery process.
www.insideoutenneagram.com