Inhibition of CD4CD25 regulatory T-cell function by calcineurin-dependent interleukin-2 production
Calcineurin inhibitors dampen humoral immunity by acting directly on naive B cells
Transcript of Calcineurin inhibitors dampen humoral immunity by acting directly on naive B cells
Calcineurin inhibitors dampen humoral immunity by acting directly on naive B
cells
Short title: In vitro effect of calcineurin inhibitors on humoral immunity.
Ruth De Bruyne 1, Delfien Bogaert
2,5, Natalie De Ruyck
3, Bart N. Lambrecht
4,
Myriam Van Winckel 1, Philippe Gevaert
3 and Melissa Dullaers
5
1 Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Princess
Elisabeth Children’s Hospital, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
2 Department of Pediatrics, Princess Elisabeth Children’s Hospital, Ghent University
Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
3 Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent
University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
4 Laboratory of Immunoregulation, VIB Inflammation Research Center, Ghent,
Belgium; Clinical Immunology Research lab, Department of Respiratory Medicine,
Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Pulmonary Medicine,
Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
5 Clinical Immunology Research Laboratory, Department of Respiratory Medicine,
Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not beenthrough the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead todifferences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as an‘Accepted Article’, doi: 10.1002/cei.12604
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
2
Corresponding author
Ruth De Bruyne
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition,
Princess Elisabeth Children’s Hospital,
Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Phone number: +32 9 332 39 66; Fax number: +32 9 332 21 70
E-mail: [email protected]
Key words
B cells
Calcineurin inhibitors
Immunoglobulins
Immunosuppression
T follicular helper cells
Page 31 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
3
Abbreviations
BAFF; B cell activating factor
CNI; calcineurin inhibitors
CyA; cyclosporine A
FK506; tacrolimus
Ig; immunoglobulin
IL; interleukin
INF-γ; interferon-γ
IS; immunosuppression
PBMC; peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Tfh; T follicular helper cells
TNF; tumor necrosis factor
Page 32 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
4
Abstract
Background
Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), used frequently in solid organ transplant patients are
known to inhibit T cell proliferation but their effect on humoral immunity is far less
studied.
Methods
Total and naive B cells from healthy adult donors, were cultured in IgA- or IgG / IgE-
promoting conditions with increasing doses of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, rapamycin or
methylprednisolone. The effect on cell number, cell division, plasmablast
differentiation and class-switching was tested. To examine the effect on T follicular
helper (Tfh) cell differentiation, naive CD4+ T cells were cultured with IL-12 and
titrated immunosuppressive drug (IS) concentrations.
Results
Total B cell function was not affected by CNI. However, naive B cell proliferation
was inhibited by cyclosporine and both CNI decreased plasmablast differentiation.
Both CNI suppressed IgA, whereas only cyclosporine inhibited IgE class-switching.
Rapamycin had a strong inhibitory effect on B cell function. Strikingly,
methylprednisolone, increased plasmablast differentiation and IgE class-switching
from naive B cells. Differentiation of Tfh cells decreased with increasing IS doses.
Conclusion
CNI did affect humoral immunity directly by suppressing naive B cells. CNI, as well
as rapamycin and methylprednisolone, inhibited the in vitro differentiation of Tfh
from naive CD4+ T cells. In view of its potent suppressive effect on B cell function
and Tfh cell differentiation, rapamycin might be an interesting candidate in the
management of B cell mediated complications post solid organ transplantation.
Page 33 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
5
Introduction
Significant progress has been made in preventing acute allograft rejection following
solid organ transplantation resulting in improved allograft survival. Chronic rejection,
however, remains a major hurdle menacing the long-term function of the transplanted
organs. Allo-immune responses primarily defined by the development of antibodies to
donor mismatched major histocompatibility antigens as well as the development of
auto-antibodies to organ specific self-antigens are involved in the pathogenesis of
chronic allograft rejection 1.
Furthermore, auto-immune disorders such as de novo autoimmune hepatitis post liver
transplantation 2 as well as de novo acquired allergic conditions post transplant are
well know complications after solid organ transplantation. The use of tacrolimus has
been associated with allergic diseases and elevated IgE in several transplant
populations 3-5
.
Since many years, calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), such as cyclosporine (CyA) and
tacrolimus (FK506), form the keystone of most maintenance immunosuppression
protocols in solid organ transplantation 6. Nowadays, the use of FK506 is preferred to
CyA because of its superiority in prevention and treatment of rejection 7,8
. CNI are
known to inhibit T cell proliferation by holding in nuclear factor of activated T cells
and interleukin (IL)-2 gene-transcription 9. Their effect on the humoral immune
response, however, is far less studied and remains to be elucidated 10
.
CNI are known to alter the balance between different CD4+ T cell subsets,
particularly by suppression of regulatory T cells 11-12
. More recently, an additional T
cell subset, known as T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, has been identified which are
CD4+
T helper cells specialized in providing help to B cells and regulating humoral
immune responses. Tfh cells control the development of antigen-specific B cell
Page 34 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
6
immunity 13
and have been implicated in autoimmune diseases 14-16
. Tfh cells are
essential for the formation and maintenance of germinal centers and for the generation
of most memory B cells and plasma cells 17,18
, providing CD40 ligand and multiple
cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-21 19-22
. These signals promote B cell
proliferation, class switch recombination, and somatic hypermutation, resulting in
highly specific, class-switched plasma cells and long-lived memory B cells 23-25
. The
original feature used to identify Tfh cells is expression of chemokine receptor CXCR5
19,26. Another important characteristic is secretion of IL-21, which is the “signature”
cytokine of Tfh cells 17
. Immunosuppressive drugs, such as tacrolimus, could
influence humoral immunity by acting on B cells directly or on Tfh cells. Antigen,
CD40 and IL-21 are absolute requirements for T cell-dependent B cell activation
resulting in proliferation, class-switching and differentiation into memory B cells or
plasma cells. IL-10 and TGF-β1 drive IgA class-switching 25,27
, whereas IL-4 induces
IgE switching 28
.
Since very little data are available on the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on
humoral immunity, we examined the direct in vitro effect of immunosuppression
(FK506, CyA, rapamycin, methylprednisolone) on differentiation and class-switching
of total and naive B cells. Furthermore, we studied the effect of these
immunosuppressive drugs on Tfh cell differentiation from naive CD4+ T cells, as they
too influence the humoral immune response.
We here demonstrate that CNI do exert a direct effect on humoral immunity by
suppressing naive B cells. Tfh cell differentiation from naive CD4+ T cells was
inhibited by all immunosuppressive drugs used.
Materials and Methods
Page 35 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
7
Cells and cell cultures
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by Ficoll-Paque density
gradient (Miltenyi Biotec) from buffycoats of healthy adult blood donors (Blood
Transfusion Center Oost-Vlaanderen, Red Cross). The study was approved by the
ethics committee of Ghent University Hospital (BTC20130116).
B cells were isolated from the lymphocyte-rich fractions using Human B Cell
Enrichment Set (BD Biosciences, CA). To obtain naive B cells, the cells were stained
for CD3, CD19, IgD and CD27. CD27- IgD
+ naive B cells were sorted on a FACSAria
(BD). The purity of sorted B cells was generally >98%.
Total and naive B cells were cultured in 96-well U bottom plates with RPMI 1640
(Gibco) supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin (Sigma), 100 µg/mL
streptomycin (Sigma), 1% non-essential amino-acids (MEM NEAA, Gibco), 1 mM
sodiumpyruvate (Gibco) and 0,05 mM βmercapto-ethanol (Gibco) at 5 - 10 x 104
cells/200 µL/well in the presence of IL-2 (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems), anti-CD40
antibody (1 µg/mL, clone 12E12, kind gift of Sandra Zurawski, Baylor Institute,
Dallas, TX) and IL-21 (20 ng/mL; Invitrogen). Prior to culture, B cells were labelled
with 0,5 µM CFSE (Invitrogen) to track proliferation. Class-switching was induced
by adding respectively human recombinant TGF-β1 (1 ng/mL; R&D Systems) and
CpG (50 nM; ODN2006, InVivogen) for IgA class-switching and IL-4 (20 ng/mL;
R&D Systems) for IgG and IgE class-switching. Immunosuppressive drugs were
added, titrated in 3 different concentrations (final concentrations in culture):
methylprednisolone and FK506 (10 -9
M, 10 -8
M, 10 -7
M), rapamycin (0,1 ng/mL, 1
ng/mL, 10 ng/mL) and CyA (10 ng/mL, 100 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL). The
immunosuppressive drugs were diluted in tissue culture medium (RPMI + additives)
at least 1/1000 for cyclosporine and at least 1/10 000 for methylprednisolone and
Page 36 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
8
tacrolimus, the initial stock solutions were stored in ethanol. The medium
concentrations of FK506 (8,04 ng/mL) and CyA (100 ng/mL) are similar to target
through serum levels during the first year after liver transplantation. Target through
serum levels for rapamycin during the first year post transplant situate between the
medium and highest dose of rapamycin used in the experiments. Cells were incubated
at 37 °C. After 7 days, supernatant was harvested and cells stained for flow
cytometry.
Naive CD4+ T cells were isolated from PBMC of healthy adult donors by negative
selection (Human Naive CD4+ T Cell Isolation Kit II; Miltenyi Biotec). Cell purity
checked with flow cytometry was always ≥ 95%. Cells were cultured in 96-well U
bottom plates with complemented RPMI 1640 at 2 x 105 cells/200 µL/well in the
presence of IL-12 (20 ng/mL; R&D Systems), plate-bound anti-CD3 (5 µg/mL;
Biolegend), soluble anti-CD28 (2 µg/mL; Biolegend) to facilitate T cell
differentiation and induce Tfh cells 29
. Prior to culture, T cells were labelled with 0,5
µM Cell Trace Violet (CTV) (Invitrogen) to track proliferation. Titrated doses of
methylprednisolone, FK506, rapamycin and CyA were added (cfr supra). Cells were
incubated at 37 °C. Supernatant was harvested after 48 hours and cells stained for
flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry
Cells were stained with fixable viability dye 506 (eBioscience) and fluorescently
labelled monoclonal antibodies using manufacturers’ instructions. Following
monoclonal antibodies were used: anti-CD3, anti-CD19, anti-CD27, anti-CD38, anti-
human IgD, anti-human IgG, anti-human IgE (all BD Biosciences); anti-human IgA
(Miltenyi Biotech); avidin/streptavidin (eBioscience); anti-human CD4 (BioLegend).
Page 37 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
9
To activate naive CD4+ T cells and subsequently measure their cytokine production
by intracellular flow staining, the cells were incubated with 100 µg/mL phorbol
myristate acetate (PMA, Sigma-Aldrich), 10 µg/mL Brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) and
2 mM GolgiStop (BD Biosciences) for 5 hr at 37° C. Intracellular staining of CD4+ T
cells was performed using PermFix and PermWash (BD Biosciences) and anti-human
IL-21 (eBioscience) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) (BioLegend).
Cells were sorted on a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) and acquired on a LSRFortessa
(BD Biosciences). At least 100 000 events per sample were recorded. Counting beads
(Flow Cytometry Absolute Count Standard, Full spectrum, Bang Laboratories) were
used to calculate the absolute number of cells based on the obtained cell percentages.
Data were analysed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, version 9.4.11).
ELISAs
ELISAs were performed to measure total IgG, IgE and IgA in the culture supernatant
(Human IgG, IgE and IgA ELISA Mabtech) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
IFN-γ and IL-21 levels were measured in culture supernatant of naive CD4+ T cells
(Specific Human ELISA ‘Ready-SET-Go!’ 2nd
generation kits; eBioscience)
according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software. Differences between groups
were compared using Friedman test. Dunn’s multiple comparison test was performed
and adjusted p values given. A p value ≤ 0,05 was considered statistically significant.
To compensate for inter-donor variability, we normalized the data by dividing the
measured values by the value of the condition without immunosuppression of the
corresponding donor.
Page 38 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
10
Results
As the direct effect of CNI on the humoral immune response is not well known, we
used an in vitro B cell class-switching system to test the effect of CNI, rapamycin and
methylprednisolone on several aspects of B cell differentiation.
Supplementary figure 1 illustrates the levels of IgA, E and G secretion obtained from
naive B cells with our in vitro class-switching system. IgA class-switching was
induced by IL-21+TGF-β1, both IgE and IgG class-switching were induced by IL-
21+IL-4 (in addition to anti-CD40 antibody and IL-2).
Effect of immunosuppression on number of cells, cell division and plasmablast
differentiation
Total and naive B cells were cultured in IgA- (TGF-β) or IgG / IgE- (IL-4) promoting
conditions in the presence of increasing doses of immunosuppression.
Both CyA and FK506 decreased the number of CD19+ B cells in the TGF-β condition
of total (p<0,001; p=0,002) and naive (p=0,002; p=0,02) B cells (figure 1, a-b). In
naive B cells, CyA had a strong dose-dependent inhibitory effect on division capacity
(p=0,02) whilst FK506 only suppressed cell division in the TGF-β condition of naive
B cells (p<0,001) (figure 1, c-d). CyA (p=0,02) and FK506 (p=0,02; p<0,001) both
significantly suppressed CD38+ plasmablast differentiation in naive but not in total B
cells (figure 1, e-f).
Rapamycin strongly suppressed B cell numbers in total B cells (p≤0,001) and in the
TGF-β condition of naive B cells (p=0,002) (figure 1, a-b). There was a strong dose-
dependent inhibitory effect on division capacity and CD38+ plasmablast
differentiation in total and naive B cells (all p<0,001) (figure 1, c-f).
Page 39 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
11
In total B cells, methylprednisolone significantly increased B cell number in the IL-4
condition (p≤0,001) with the same trend present in the naive B cells (figure 1, a-b).
Strikingly, in naive B cells, methylprednisolone had a stimulating effect on CD38+
plasmablast differentiation in low and especially medium (p=0,007; p=0,001) doses.
In the medium concentration of the IL-4 condition, CD38+ plasmablasts nearly
doubled compared to the control condition without immunosuppression. This effect
was absent in total B cells (figure 1, e-f).
Effect of immunosuppression on Ig class-switching
In total B cells, CyA and FK506 did not exhibit any significant effect on either IgA or
IgE class-switching whilst both had a dose-dependent suppressive effect on IgA class-
switching (p=0,002; p<0,001) and IgA secretion (p=0,04; p=0,02) in naive B cells.
Moreover, increasing doses of CyA suppressed IgE class-switching (p=0,02) and IgE
secretion (p=0,04) in naive B cells but FK506 did not significantly affect IgE class-
switching or IgE secretion in these cells (figure 2, a-d).
Rapamycin inhibited IgA as well as IgE class-switching in total and naive B cells (all
p<0,001) (figure 2, a-b). Rapamycin also induced a significant dose-dependent
decrease in IgA secretion in total (p<0,001) and naive (p=0,02) B cells. IgE secretion
was suppressed in naive B cells only (p=0,001) (figure 2, c-d).
Methylprednisolone inhibited IgA (p=0,002) and IgE (p=0,02) class-switching in total
B cells (p≤0,02) (figure 2, a). In naive B cells, IgA class-switching was suppressed
(p=0,002) but IgE class-switching was induced in low and medium (p=0,003)
concentrations (figure 2, b). IgE secretion, on the contrary, was significantly
suppressed in naive B cells (p=0,02) (figure 2, d).
Page 40 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
12
Rapamycin strongly decreased IgG secretion in all conditions of total (p<0,001) and
naive (p=0,01) B cells. There was no significant effect of CNI or methylprednisolone
on IgG secretion (figure 2, c-d).
CNI strongly suppress in vitro induction of IL-21 expressing Tfh cells
To examine the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on Tfh cell differentiation, we
cultured naive CD4+ T cells from healthy adult donors with IL-12 (to stimulate Tfh
cell skewing) 29
and titrated concentrations of CyA, FK506, methylprednisolone or
rapamycin.
The division capacity of CD4+ T cells was significantly suppressed by CyA, FK506,
rapamycin and methylprednisolone (p<0,001) (figure 3, b).
The frequency of IFN-γ+ (all p<0,001) and IL-21
+ (p<0,001 for CyA and FK; p=0,003
for methylprednisolone and rapamycin) single positive, as well as IFN-γ+
IL-21+
double positive (all p<0,001) CD3+
CD4+ T cells decreased under all four
immunosuppressive drugs although to a different extent, with CyA and FK506
exerting the strongest effect (figure 3, a). These results matched the results of the
cytokine secretion in culture supernatants (secreted INF-γ, all p<0,001; secreted IL-
21, p<0,001; p=0,002; p=0,03; p=0,01 for FK506, CyA, methylprednisolone and
rapamycin respectively) (figure 3, c).
An overview of all (adjusted) p values is given in table 1 (supplementary section).
Discussion
Humoral immune reactions can impair the long-term prognosis of solid organ
transplantation. Allo-antibodies and auto-antibodies to organ-specific self-antigens
Page 41 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
13
might damage organ function because of their role in chronic graft rejection.
Furthermore, the development of de novo autoimmune diseases and allergic disorders
puts a burden on solid organ transplant patients. CNI are the immunosuppressive
drugs of choice after solid organ transplantation but their direct effect on the humoral
immune response is not well known. Hence, we examined the in vitro effect of
immunosuppression on differentiation and class-switching of total and naive B cells
and the effect of these immunosuppressive drugs on Tfh cell differentiation from
naive CD4+ T cells. We found that CNI do exert an effect on humoral immunity
directly by suppressing naive B cells and not only indirectly via their effect on T cell
help.
Tfh cells exert an important role in autoimmune disease. Increased frequencies of Tfh
cells have been associated with autoimmune thyroid disease, systemic lupus
erythematosus and systemic sclerosis 14-16
. CNI, rapamycin and methylprednisolone
inhibited Tfh cell differentiation from naive CD4+ T cells.
Hence, the development of auto-antibodies in solid organ transplant patients does not
seem a consequence of a direct effect of the immunosuppressive drugs on Tfh cells.
Our experiments were carried out in vitro on monocultures of either B or T cells. The
in vivo findings in solid organ transplant patients, however, can result from an overall
net effect of CNI on the interplay of B cells and different T cell subsets.
In total B cells, CNI did not affect B cell proliferation, plasmablast differentiation or
surface immunoglobulin expression. In naive B cells, however, CNI did inhibit B cell
proliferation and plasmablast differentiation. IgA was suppressed by both CNI
whereas IgE class-switching was suppressed by CyA only. These results demonstrate
a direct inhibitory effect of CNI on humoral immunity alongside of their influence on
T cell help, since in all conditions T cell help was provided.
Page 42 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
14
CyA suppressed both IgE surface expression and secretion in supernatant of naive B
cells. With FK506, IgE surface expression even tended to rise, leaving IgE secretion
unaffected. This might explain the reported disappearance of clinical and biological
symptoms of newly acquired allergy post transplant after a switch from a FK506 to a
CyA based immunosuppressive regimen 30
. The suppression of IgE class-switching by
CyA, but not by FK506, might be responsible for this observation.
Heidt et al demonstrated that FK506, CyA and rapamycin attenuate cytokine
production (including IFN-γ) of activated CD4+
T cells on mRNA level 10
. In analogy
with our findings, Abadja et al described that FK506 caused a dramatic decrease of
IL-21 expression, as well as a less pronounced reduction of IFN-γ expression by
CD4+
T cells 12
. However no data are available on the effect of CNI on Tfh cell
differentiation, which might be of relevance in view of the increased auto-immunity
observed in solid organ transplant patients. We demonstrated that CNI did not have a
direct stimulating effect on Tfh cell differentiation from naive CD4+ T cells.
Furthermore, the number of IL-21+ Tfh cells decreased with increasing doses of
immunosuppression, which was most pronounced with CyA. An alternative that we
did not study here, is that CNI might affect the balance between Tfh and other T
helper cells 31,32
, which hence could influence humoral immunity.
Our in vitro experiments were carried out on PBMC from adult donors. The immune
system of neonates and young children is thought to be immature and more
tolerogenic compared to that of adults. Naive B and T cells better reflect this
immature immune system. The differential effect of CNI on naive versus total B cells
should therefore be taken in consideration when treating young patients, given the
possibility that immunosuppressive drugs such as FK506 could exhibit a specific
effect on the immature humoral immune system. This specific effect could play a role
Page 43 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
15
in the observation that young children are more prone to develop allergic disorders
after transplantation. De novo acquired food allergy indeed is very common in
children after liver transplantation and rarely encountered in the adult transplant
population.
We showed that rapamycin had a strong dose-dependent inhibitory effect on B cell
number and proliferation in both total and naive B cells. This effect can be explained
by an inhibition of B cell cycle progression 33,34
but also by induction of B cell
apoptosis 35
. The potent inhibition of rapamycin on plasmablast differentiation and Ig
class-switching and Ig secretion we observed, is a logical downstream effect hereof.
Despite the long term use of glucocorticoids in B cell dependent diseases, their effects
on B cells have not been intensily investigated. B cells are still considered to be
relatively ‘resistant’ to glucocorticoids although glucocorticoid receptors have been
found on the B cell membrane of patients affected with rheumatoid arthritis 36
. It has
been shown that treatment with high doses of dexamethasone can cause a significant
reduction of circulating B cell activating factor (BAFF) and its mRNA 37
. BAFF
which is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family, is capable of regulating
B lymphocyte survival and maturation, antibody production and immunoglobulin
switching 38,39
. Remarkably, we observed that especially medium concentrations of
methylprednisolone caused a significant increase in CD38+ plasmablast
differentiation from naive B cells in vitro. This finding is new and the mechanism
unclear. Methylprednisolone might have a stimulating effect on B cell activation
which only becomes apparent in naive B cells, by lowering their threshold for
activation. However, immunoglobulin secretion, did not follow the rise in
plasmablasts, so perhaps the development of these methylprednisolone-induced
plasmablasts into functional plasma cells was impaired.
Page 44 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
16
Furthermore, methylprednisolone induced IgE class-switching in low and medium
concentrations in naive B cells. In analogy, Jabara et al also showed an induction of in
vitro IgE class-switching in human purified B cells by hydrocortisone 40
. A polyclonal
rise in serum IgE has also been seen in vivo in patients treated with prednison. These
findings, which seem to be in contrast with the clinically observed anti-allergic effects
of steroid therapy, in fact support a broader anti-inflammatory and
immunomodulatory effect by suppressing cytokine production and inflammatory cell
infiltration 41-43
.
Conclusion
B cell proliferation, plasmablast differentiation and surface immunoglobulin
expression are not directly affected by CNI in total B cells, whilst in naive B cells
CNI inhibit these processes. This differential effect might need to be taken into
consideration when treating young patients. Furthermore, CNI, as well as rapamycin
and methylprednisolone, inhibit in vitro differentiation of Tfh from naive CD4+ T
cells. In view of its potent suppressive effect on B cell division, plasmablast
differentiation, Ig secretion and Tfh cell differentiation, rapamycin might be an
interesting candidate for the prevention and/or treatment of B cell mediated
complications after solid organ transplantation.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof Dr Karim Vermaelen for use of the laboratory infrastructure and Kim
Deswarte for his assistance with cell sorting.
Funding
Page 45 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
17
P Gevaert, M Dullaers, R De Bruyne received a grant as respectively senior clinical
investigator, postdoctoral fellow and clinical Ph.D. fellow by the Flemish Scientific
Research Board (FWO Vlaanderen). The research was supported by a personal grant
of FWO to M Dullaers (FWO14/KAN/019).
Disclosure
All authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
References
1. Sarma NJ, Tiriveedhi V, Angaswamy N, Mohanakumar T. Role of antibodies
to self-antigens in chronic allograft rejection: potential mechanism and
therapeutic implications. Hum Immunol. 2012;73(12):1275–1281.
doi:10.1016/j.humimm.2012.06.014.
2. Gupta P, Hart J, Millis JM, Cronin D, Brady L. De novo hepatitis with
autoimmune antibodies and atypical histology: a rare cause of late graft
dysfunction after pediatric liver transplantation. Transplantation.
2001;71(5):664–668.
3. Asante-Korang A, Boyle GJ, Webber SA, Miller SA, Fricker FJ. Experience of
FK506 immune suppression in pediatric heart transplantation: a study of long-
term adverse effects. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1996;15(4):415–422.
4. Gruber S, Tiringer K, Dehlink E, et al. Allergic sensitization in kidney-
transplanted patients prevails under tacrolimus treatment. Clinical &
Experimental Allergy. 2011;41(8):1125–1132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-
2222.2011.03761.x.
5. Kawamura N, Furuta H, Tame A, et al. Extremely high serum level of IgE
during immunosuppressive therapy: paradoxical effect of cyclosporine A and
tacrolimus. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1997;112(4):422–424.
6. Coelho T, Tredger M, Dhawan A. Current status of immunosuppressive agents
for solid organ transplantation in children. Pediatr Transplant.
2012;16(2):106–122. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2012.01644.x.
7. Spada M, Riva S, Maggiore G, Cintorino D, Gridelli B. Pediatric liver
transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(6):648–674.
Page 46 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
18
8. Saeed SA, Integlia MJ, Pleskow RG, et al. Tacrolimus-associated eosinophilic
gastroenterocolitis in pediatric liver transplant recipients: role of potential food
allergies in pathogenesis. Pediatr Transplant. 2006;10(6):730–735.
doi:10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00538.x.
9. Wiederrecht G, Lam E, Hung S, Martin M, Sigal N. The mechanism of action
of FK-506 and cyclosporin A. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;696:9–19.
10. Heidt S, Roelen DL, Eijsink C, et al. Calcineurin inhibitors affect B cell
antibody responses indirectly by interfering with T cell help. Clin Exp
Immunol. 2010;159(2):199–207. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04051.x.
11. Kim HY, Cho M-L, Jhun JY, et al. The imbalance of T helper 17/regulatory T
cells and memory B cells during the early post-transplantation period in
peripheral blood of living donor liver transplantation recipients under
calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. Immunology.
2013;138(2):124–133. doi:10.1111/imm.12021.
12. Abadja F, Atemkeng S, Alamartine E, Berthoux F, Mariat C. Impact of
mycophenolic acid and tacrolimus on Th17-related immune response.
Transplantation. 2011;92(4):396–403. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3182247b5f.
13. Fazilleau N, Mark L, McHeyzer-Williams LJ, McHeyzer-Williams MG.
Follicular helper T cells: lineage and location. Immunity. 2009;30(3):324–335.
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.03.003.
14. Zhu C, Ma J, Liu Y, et al. Increased frequency of follicular helper T cells in
patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2012;97(3):943–950. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2003.
15. Simpson N, Gatenby PA, Wilson A, et al. Expansion of circulating T cells
resembling follicular helper T cells is a fixed phenotype that identifies a subset
of severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(1):234–244.
doi:10.1002/art.25032.
16. Morita R, Schmitt N, Bentebibel S-E, et al. Human blood CXCR5(+)CD4(+) T
cells are counterparts of T follicular cells and contain specific subsets that
differentially support antibody secretion. Immunity. 2011;34(1):108–121.
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.012.
17. Crotty S. Follicular helper CD4 T cells (TFH). Annu Rev Immunol.
2011;29:621–663. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101400.
18. Kato LM, Kawamoto S, Maruya M, Fagarasan S. Gut TFH and IgA: key
players for regulation of bacterial communities and immune homeostasis.
Immunology and Cell Biology. 2014;92(1):49–56. doi:10.1038/icb.2013.54.
19. Breitfeld D, Ohl L, Kremmer E, et al. Follicular B helper T cells express CXC
chemokine receptor 5, localize to B cell follicles, and support immunoglobulin
production. J Exp Med. 2000;192(11):1545–1552.
20. King C, Tangye SG, Mackay CR. T follicular helper (TFH) cells in normal and
Page 47 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
19
dysregulated immune responses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2008;26:741–766.
doi:10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090344.
21. Moser B, Schaerli P, Loetscher P. CXCR5(+) T cells: follicular homing takes
center stage in T-helper-cell responses. Trends Immunol. 2002;23(5):250–254.
22. Vogelzang A, McGuire HM, Yu D, Sprent J, Mackay CR, King C. A
fundamental role for interleukin-21 in the generation of T follicular helper
cells. Immunity. 2008;29(1):127–137. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.06.001.
23. Liu YJ, Arpin C. Germinal center development. Immunol Rev. 1997;156:111–
126.
24. MacLennan IC. Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12(1):117–139.
doi:10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.001001.
25. Dullaers M, Li D, Xue Y, et al. A T cell-dependent mechanism for the
induction of human mucosal homing immunoglobulin A-secreting
plasmablasts. Immunity. 2009;30(1):120–129.
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.11.008.
26. Schaerli P, Willimann K, Lang AB, Lipp M, Loetscher P, Moser B. CXC
chemokine receptor 5 expression defines follicular homing T cells with B cell
helper function. J Exp Med. 2000;192(11):1553–1562.
27. Coffman RL, Lebman DA, Shrader B. Transforming growth factor beta
specifically enhances IgA production by lipopolysaccharide-stimulated murine
B lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1989;170(3):1039–1044.
28. Lebman DA, Coffman RL. Interleukin 4 causes isotype switching to IgE in T
cell-stimulated clonal B cell cultures. J Exp Med. 1988;168(3):853–862.
29. Schmitt N, Morita R, Bourdery L, et al. Human dendritic cells induce the
differentiation of interleukin-21-producing T follicular helper-like cells through
interleukin-12. Immunity. 2009;31(1):158–169.
doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.016.
30. Maarof G, Krzysiek R, Décline J-L, Cohen J, Habes D, Jacquemin E.
Management of post-liver transplant-associated IgE-mediated food allergy in
children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(5):1296–1298.
doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1094.
31. Kim H-P, Korn LL, Gamero AM, Leonard WJ. Calcium-dependent activation
of interleukin-21 gene expression in T cells. J Biol Chem.
2005;280(26):25291–25297. doi:10.1074/jbc.M501459200.
32. Nakayamada S, Takahashi H, Kanno Y, O'Shea JJ. Helper T cell diversity and
plasticity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2012;24(3):297–302.
doi:10.1016/j.coi.2012.01.014.
33. Aagaard-Tillery KM, Jelinek DF. Inhibition of human B lymphocyte cell cycle
progression and differentiation by rapamycin. Cell Immunol. 1994;156(2):493–
Page 48 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
20
507. doi:10.1006/cimm.1994.1193.
34. Zhang S, Readinger JA, DuBois W, et al. Constitutive reductions in mTOR
alter cell size, immune cell development, and antibody production. Blood.
2011;117(4):1228–1238. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-05-287821.
35. Heidt S, Roelen DL, Eijsink C, van Kooten C, Claas FHJ, Mulder A. Effects of
immunosuppressive drugs on purified human B cells: evidence supporting the
use of MMF and rapamycin. Transplantation. 2008;86(9):1292–1300.
doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181874a36.
36. Bartholome B, Spies CM, Gaber T, et al. Membrane glucocorticoid receptors
(mGCR) are expressed in normal human peripheral blood mononuclear cells
and up-regulated after in vitro stimulation and in patients with rheumatoid
arthritis. FASEB J. 2004;18(1):70–80. doi:10.1096/fj.03-0328com.
37. Huard B, Schneider P, Mauri D, Tschopp J, French LE. T cell costimulation by
the TNF ligand BAFF. The Journal of Immunology. 2001;167(11):6225–6231.
38. Youinou P, Pers J-O. The late news on baff in autoimmune diseases.
Autoimmun Rev. 2010;9(12):804–806. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2010.06.011.
39. Zen M, Canova M, Campana C, et al. The kaleidoscope of glucorticoid effects
on immune system. Autoimmun Rev. 2011;10(6):305–310.
doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2010.11.009.
40. Jabara HH, Ahern DJ, Vercelli D, Geha RS. Hydrocortisone and IL-4 induce
IgE isotype switching in human B cells. J Immunol. 1991;147(5):1557–1560.
41. Zieg G, Lack G, Harbeck RJ, Gelfand EW, Leung DY. In vivo effects of
glucocorticoids on IgE production. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;94(2 Pt
1):222–230.
42. Settipane GA, Pudupakkam RK, McGowan JH. Corticosteroid effect on
immunoglobulins. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1978;62(3):162–166.
43. Posey WC, Nelson HS, Branch B, Pearlman DS. The effects of acute
corticosteroid therapy for asthma on serum immunoglobulin levels. J Allergy
Clin Immunol. 1978;62(6):340–348.
Page 49 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
21
Figure legends
Figure 1
Influence of immunosuppression on B cell division and differentiation in vitro.
Total and naive B cells were cultured for 7 days with or without immunosuppressive
drugs (IS) in IgG- / IgE- (IL-4) and IgA- (TGF-β) promoting conditions. Proliferation
and CD38+ plasmablast differentiation were analyzed using flow cytometry. Mean ±
SD of 5 different healthy donors without or with titrated doses of IS are plotted for
CD19+ alive B cell count (a, b), percentage of divided cells (CFSE) (c, d) and
percentage of CD38+ plasmablasts (e, f). Per donor, the measured values were divided
by the value of the condition without IS (‘none’), to compensate for inter-donor
variability. Rapa, rapamycin; MethylPred, methylprednisolone; FK506, tacrolimus;
CyA, cyclosporine A.
Figure 2
Influence of immunosuppression on immunoglobulin class-switching and
secretion in vitro.
Total and naive B cells were cultured for 7 days with or without immunosuppressive
drugs (IS) in IgG- / IgE- (IL-4) and IgA- (TGF-β, CpG) promoting conditions.
Surface Ig expression were analyzed by flow cytometry. Mean ± SD of 5 different
healthy donors without or with titrated doses of IS are plotted for IgE and IgA surface
staining (a, b). Secreted IgE, IgA and IgG were measured by ELISA in supernatant
and the mean ± SD of 5 different healthy donors was plotted (c, d). Per donor, the
measured values were divided by the value of the condition without IS (‘none’), to
Page 50 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
22
compensate for interdonor variability. Rapa, rapamycin; MethylPred,
methylprednisolone; FK506, tacrolimus; CyA, cyclosporine A.
Figure 3
Influence of immunosuppression on T follicular helper (Tfh) cell differentiation
from naive CD4+ T cells in vitro.
Naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3, anti-CD28 and IL-12 for 48 hours
to induce Tfh cell differentiation with or without immunosuppressive drugs (IS).
Interferon-γ (INF-γ) and IL-21 were analyzed by intracellular cytokine staining (a)
and ELISA on the culture supernatant (c). Mean ± SD of 6 different healthy donors
are plotted. T cell division was monitored using Cell trace Violet (CTV) dilution (b).
Absolute values were per donor normalized to the condition without IS (‘none’), to
compensate for interdonor variability. Rapa, rapamycin; MethylPred,
methylprednisolone; FK506, tacrolimus; CyA, cyclosporine A.
Supplementary figure 1
Isotype skewing by different cytokines in human naive B cells.
Naive B cells were cultured for 7 days in the presence of anti-CD40 antibody and IL-
2 alone or IL-2+IL-21 or IL-2+IL-21+TGF-β1 or IL-2+IL-21+IL-4 as indicated.
Secreted IgA, IgE and IgG were measured by ELISA in supernatants and the mean ±
SD of 9 different healthy donors was plotted. Raw data are shown.
Page 51 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
b
Naive B cells Total B cells IL-4 TGF-β IL-4 TGF-β
d
f
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
4
5
Concentration IS
CD19+ alive B cells
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
divided cells
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
CD38+ plasmablasts
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
Cel
l num
ber /
no
IS
CD19+ alive B cells
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% d
ivid
ed c
ells
/ no
IS
divided cells
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
% C
D38
+ / n
o IS
CD38+ plasmablastsh
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
4
5
Concentration ISC
ell n
umbe
r / n
o IS
CD19+ alive B cells
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% d
ivid
ed c
ells
/ no
ISdivided cells
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% C
D38
+ / n
o IS
CD38+ plasmablasts
d
f
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
Cel
l num
ber /
no
IS
CD19+ alive B cells
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% d
ivid
ed c
ells
/ no
IS
divided cells
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
% C
D38
+ / n
o IS
CD38+ plasmablasts
CyAFKMPrapa
Page 52 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
4445464748495051525354555657585960
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IgE
/ no
IS
IgE
Naive B cells Total B cells
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
% o
f aliv
e ce
lls /
no IS
IgE+ cells
IL-4 IL-4 TGF-β TGF-β
IgG
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IgG
/ no
IS
IgE
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IgE
/ no
IS
IgG
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IgG
/ no
IS
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
% o
f aliv
e ce
lls /
no IS
IgE+ cells
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
% o
f aliv
e ce
lls /
no IS
IgA+ cells
b
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IgA
/ no
IS
IgA IgA
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IgA
/ no
IS
CyAFKMPrapa
None Low Medium High0
1
2
3
Concentration IS
% o
f aliv
e ce
lls /
no IS
IgA+ cells
d
Page 53 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
4445464748495051525354555657585960
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
CyAFKMPrapa
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% o
f CD
4+ T
cells
/ no
IS INFγ+
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS%
of C
D4+
T ce
lls/ n
o IS
IL-21+
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% o
f CD
4+ T
cells
/ no
IS IL-21+ INFγ+
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
% o
f aliv
e ce
lls /
no IS
CD4+ T cell division
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IFN
-γ /
no IS
Secreted INF-γ
c
None Low Medium High0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Concentration IS
Secr
eted
IL-2
1 / n
o IS
Secreted IL-21
Page 54 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
4445464748495051525354555657585960
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
IgA
IL-2
IL-2+IL-21
IL-2+IL-21+IL-4
IL-2+IL-21+TGF-β1
0
100
200
300
ng/mL
IgE
IL-2
IL-2+IL-21
IL-2+IL-21+IL-4
IL-2+IL-21+TGF-β1
0
5
10
15
20
ng/mL
IgG
IL-2
IL-2+IL-21
IL-2+IL-21+IL-4
IL-2+IL-21+TGF-β1
0
100
200
300
400
500
ng/mL
Page 55 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
4445464748495051525354555657585960
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Supplementary table 1
Overview of (adjusted) p values for all examined conditions.
Friedman
test
Multiple comparisons
none
versus
low
none
versus
medium
none
versus
high
B cell number
Total B cells
+ IL-4 FK 0,06 ns ns ns
CyA 0,04 ns ns ns
MP < 0,001 ns 0,04 0,002
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns < 0,001
Total B cells
+ TGF-β
FK 0,002 ns ns < 0,001
CyA < 0,001 ns 0,02 < 0,001
MP 0,3 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,01 < 0,001
Naive B cells
+ IL-4
FK 0,7 ns ns ns
CyA 0,05 ns ns ns
MP 0,05 ns ns ns
RAPA 0,4 ns ns ns
Naive B cells
+ TGF-β
FK 0,02 ns ns 0,01
CyA 0,002 ns ns 0,01
MP 0,9 ns ns ns
RAPA 0,002 ns ns ns
B cell division
Total B cells
+ IL-4 FK 0,07 ns ns ns
CyA 0,4 ns ns ns
MP 0,03 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,02 < 0,001
Total B cells
+ TGF-β
FK 0,2 ns ns ns
CyA 0,05 ns ns 0,04
MP 0,3 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,002 < 0,001
Naive B cells
+ IL-4
FK 0,7 ns ns ns
CyA 0,02 ns ns ns
MP 0,07 ns ns ns
Page 56 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,02 0,009
Naive B cells
+ TGF-β
FK < 0,001 ns ns 0,002
CyA 0,02 ns ns ns
MP 0,3 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns 0,04
CD38+ B cells
Total B cells
+ IL-4 FK 0,4 ns ns ns
CyA 0,3 ns ns ns
MP 0,05 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns < 0,001
Total B cells
+ TGF-β
FK 0,1 ns ns ns
CyA 0,05 ns ns ns
MP 0,2 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,02 < 0,001
Naive B cells
+ IL-4
FK 0,02 ns ns 0,02
CyA 0,02 ns 0,004 ns
MP 0,007 ns 0,009 ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,04 < 0,001
Naive B cells
+ TGF-β
FK < 0,001 ns 0,04 0,004
CyA 0,02 ns ns 0,03
MP 0,001 ns 0,004 ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns 0,002
IgE+ B cells
Total B cells FK 0,2 ns ns ns
CyA 0,2 ns ns ns
MP 0,02 ns ns 0,005
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,001 < 0,001
Naive B cells
FK 0,9 ns ns ns
CyA 0,02 ns ns ns
MP 0,003 0,03 0,02 ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns 0,02
IgA+ B cells
Total B cells FK 0,8 ns ns ns
CyA 0,6 ns ns ns
MP 0,002 ns ns < 0,001
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns 0,02
Naive B cells
FK < 0,001 ns ns 0,002
CyA 0,002 ns ns 0,01
MP 0,002 ns ns 0,04
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,04 < 0,001
Page 57 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
IgE in SN
Total B cells FK 0,2 ns ns ns
CyA 0,08 ns ns ns
MP 0,08 ns ns ns
RAPA 0,07 ns ns ns
Naive B cells
FK 0,5 ns ns ns
CyA 0,04 ns ns ns
MP 0,02 ns ns ns
RAPA 0,001 ns ns 0,01
IgA in SN
Total B cells FK 0,002 ns ns 0,003
CyA 0,007 ns ns 0,01
MP 0,5 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns < 0,001 < 0,001
Naive B cells
FK 0,02 ns ns 0,01
CyA 0,04 ns ns ns
MP 0,07 ns ns ns
RAPA 0,02 ns 0,02 0,03
IgG in SN
(IL-4)
Total B cells FK 0,15 ns ns ns
CyA 0,42 ns ns ns
MP 0,8 ns ns ns
RAPA < 0,001 ns ns < 0,001
Naive B cells
FK 0,34 ns ns ns
CyA 0,05 ns ns ns
MP 0,61 ns ns ns
RAPA 0,01 ns 0,06 ns
CD4+ cells
INF-γ+
FK < 0,001 ns 0,04 < 0,001
CyA < 0,001 ns ns 0,002
MP < 0,001 ns ns 0,04
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,01 0,001
IL-21+
FK < 0,001 ns 0,01 < 0,001
CyA < 0,001 ns 0,002 0,002
MP 0,003 ns ns 0,01
RAPA 0,003 ns ns 0,005
INF-γ+ IL-21
+
FK < 0,001 ns 0,005 0,001
CyA < 0,001 ns 0,005 0,001
MP < 0,001 ns ns 0,005
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,02 0,001
Secreted INF-γ
FK < 0,001 ns ns < 0,001
CyA < 0,001 ns 0,02 < 0,001
MP < 0,001 ns 0,04 < 0,001
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,02 < 0,001
Page 58 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Secreted IL-21
FK < 0,001 0,01 ns 0,002
CyA 0,002 0,007 ns 0,01
MP 0,03 ns 0,01 ns
RAPA 0,01 ns 0,01 ns
T cell division
FK < 0,001 ns 0,04 < 0,001
CyA < 0,001 ns 0,003 0,01
MP < 0,001 ns ns 0,02
RAPA < 0,001 ns 0,01 < 0,001
Page 59 of 60 Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Supplementary table 1:
(Adjusted) p values after Friedman test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test for all
examined conditions (each compared to the same condition without immunosuppression).
A(n) (adjusted) p value of ≤ 0,05 was considered statistically significant. CyA, cyclosporine
A; FK, tacrolimus; MP, methylprednisolone; ns, non significant; RAPA, rapamycin; SN,
supernatant.
Page 60 of 60Clinical Experimental Immunology
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.