18.6 Rebuilding of Bridges 18.6.1 Basic Condition for Bridge ...
-
Upload
khangminh22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
1 -
download
0
Transcript of 18.6 Rebuilding of Bridges 18.6.1 Basic Condition for Bridge ...
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-33
18.6 Rebuilding of Bridges
18.6.1 Basic Condition for Bridge Design
In this section, the fundamental matters for bridge design (design standards, road condition, topographical
and geological condition, and design load) are shown as below.
(1) Design Standards
The following major technical standards as shown in the Table will be applied in the preliminary design of
bridges in this project. There are some bridge design standards based on the standards of New Zealand and
Australia in Fiji. These standards specify the basic regulations such as live loads but details are not
specified. Therefore, the standards of Fiji, New Zealand, Australia and Japan will be referred and decided
properly in order to implement the preliminary design in this project. Furthermore, the details should be
decided through discussion with MOIT when the detailed design is implemented.
Table 18-9 Major Technical Standards and Reference Documents
No. Name Editor / Publishing Office Date of
publication Remarks
1 Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc
Japan River Association January 2000
2 SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES Japan Road Association March 2012
3 Cabinet Order on Road Design Standards Japan Road Association February 2004
4 Design Guide - BRIDGE, WHARF, JETTY, CULVERT, AND CROSSING STRUCTURES -
Revision: Version A
Fiji Road Authority June 2015 Bridge Design
Standards
5 GUIDE TO ROAD DESIGN Austroad August 2010 Road Design Standards
6 BRIDGE MANUAL (SP/M/022) Third Edition New Zealand Transport Agency
September 2014 Bridge Design Standards
7 AS/NZS 1170.0:2002 Australian/New Zealand
Standard June 2002
General requirements are
shown in structural design
8 NZS 1170.5: 2004 New Zealand Standard December 2004 Seismic Design Standards
9 NZS 3101:2006 New Zealand Standard March 2006 Design Standards for
Concrete Structures
Source: JICA Study Team
(2) Geometric Structure of Road
In Fiji, there is not any original road design standard, and the “Guide to Road Design” (hereinafter, AU
Road Standard) issued by Austroads is utilized instead. In this design, this standard is utilized for reference.
1) Road Classification
The road standards in Fiji are classified into 2 types according to the “Design Guide – BRIDGE, WHARF,
JETTY, CULVERT AND CROSSING STRUCTURES – Revision: Version A” (hereinafter, FRA
Standards), the routes Rural R1 and Urban Arterial as shown in the following figure are classified as
Importance Level 3, and other roads are classified as Importance Level 2. Therefore, bridges as for FS in
this project are classified as below.
Nadi Town Bridge: Importance Level 3 (Rural R1: a bridge on Queens Road)
Old Queens Road Bridge: Importance Level 2 (Normal Bridge)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-34
Figure 18-26 Routes as Importance Level 3
Source: Design Guide -BRIDGE, WHARF, JETTY, CULVERTAND CROSSING STRUCTURES-Revision: Version A Date:
June 2015
2) Operating Speed
The design speed is set up considering the site conditions and referring the “AU Road Standard”
requirements as below.
a) Nadi Town Bridge: V=40km/h
The traffic volume of large-sized vehicle is small at the site (most of those come and go Nadi Back Road),
and there is a crossing at the bridge south site (no traffic signal). The necessity to increase the design speed
at south side of crossing is judged to be low because the road shoulder there, as a business area, is used for
parking space. Meanwhile, the existing curve radius R around the crossing is about 50m. Considering the
abovementioned site conditions, the minimum design speed (Operating Speed) is set up as V=40km/h
based on the following reasons.
The minimum design speed (Operating Speed) at Urban Area is V=40km/h (according to AU
Road Standard)
According to AU Road Standard 7.4, the minimum (desirable) curve radius for design speed
(Operating Speed) V=40km/h is R=36m. On the other hand, the minimum (desirable) curve
radius for design speed (Operating Speed) V=50km/h is R=56m. Therefore, the design speed
V=50km/h cannot be applied under the regulation (the satisfied minimum curve radius is found
as R=49, however, it is judged that there is not needed to increase the design speed considering
the site condition).
b) Old Queens Road Bridge: V=60km/h
The large-sized vehicles come and go to the cement factory near the site bridge mostly toward Nadi Back
Road, and they seldom use the bridge. Also, the road front and behind the bridge curves about R=100m.
According to AU Road Standard7.4, the minimum (desirable) curve radius for the design speed (Operating
Speed) V=60km/h is R=94m. On the other hand, the minimum (desirable) curve radius for V=70km/h is
R=154m, so, the design speed V=70km/h cannot be applied under the regulation. Therefore, the design
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-35
speed of V=60km/h is selected.
Table 18-10 Minimum Curve Radius
:Nadi Town Bridge:
:Old Queens Road Bridge
Source: GUIDE TO ROAD DESIGN 7.4
3) Cross Sections
The design cross section is set up as shown below referring FRA Standard, Bridge Manual Third Edition,
Sep. 2014, NZ Transport Agency (hereinafter, NZTA Standard), and the past successful construction results
in Fiji.
Nadi Town Bridge Old Queens Road Bridge
Figure 18-27 Design Cross Section
The reasons for the set-up are shown below.
a) Number of Traffic Lanes
Nadi Town Bridge: 1 Lane for one side bound as same to the current condition
Old Queen Road Bridge: 1 Lane for one side bound as same to the approach road of
front and behind the existing bridge. It was so set up as same to the
approach road due to congestion at the current bridge.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-36
b) Width of Traffic Lane
The width of traffic lane is set up as 3.5m referring the regulation of Appendix A of NZTA Standard.
Source: Bridge manual Third edition, Sep. 2014, NZ Transport Agency
c) Width of Shoulder
The width of shoulder is set up as 0.3m referring the existing site experience (Denarau Bridge; see figure
below, under construction currently).
Figure 18-28 Cross Section of Denarau Bridge Source: Provided by a local contractor
d) Width of Sidewalk
As shown below;
Nadi Town Bridge: 3.0m (Cycling & Pedestrian Road), 1.5m (Pedestrian
Walkway) (Refer to Improvement Plan for Queens Road)
Old Queens Road Bridge: Referring to NZTA Standard, one side walkway is 1.5m.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-37
Source: Bridge manual Third edition, Sep. 2014, NZ Transport Agency
e) Width of Barrier Curb
Referring past successful construction results, 0.45m is set up.
4) Gradient and Crossfall
a) Gradient
The steepest gradient is set up referring AU Road Standard 8.5.3, and considering the geographical
conditions around the bridge location and design speed.
Nadi Town Bridge: 8%
No gradient is specified for the design speed (Operating Speed) V=40km/h, therefore, the gradient of
60km/h-Flat is applied and if this application is difficult, it will be reconsidered separately.
Old Queens Road Bridge: 8%
The design speed (Operating Speed) V=60km/h-Flat is applied.
Source: GUIDE TO ROAD DESIGN 7.4 Table 8.3
b) Crossfall
The crossfall is set up as 3% (upgrade from both portal) referring NZTA Standard.
(3) Geometric Structure of Tramline
Since there is no regulation regarding geometric structure of tramline in Fiji, the followings are applied
referring FSC (Fiji Sugar Corporation) and the hearing results from local consultants.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-38
a) Clearance Limit
It will be set up based on the internal cross section (height H x width B = 5.0m x 5.26m) of Qeleloa Over
Pass which stride over the tramline because no answer was obtained by hearing.
b) Gradient
Horizontal is set up following the direction by FSC.
c) Minimum Curve Radius
The minimum curve radius is set up as R=40m based on the result of hearing to local consultants.
(4) Topographical and Geological Condition
Nadi Town Bridge is located about 10km from the mouth of Nadi River, Old Queens Road Bridge is
located about 17km from the mouth of river, and the former elevation is +6~8m, the latter elevation is
+11~12m on alluvial plain.
Around the Nadi Town Bridge, there are residential zones, business area and plantations. Fruit trees of
banana and papaya, etc., are cultivated. The land around the Old Queens Road Bridge is mainly utilized as
plantation for sugar cane but cement factory and several residential houses are also located near the bridge.
The geological feature around the Nadi Town Bridge is composed by soft silt ~ sandy soil with N value of
less than 10 between 16m ~ 24m from G.L., and diluvial clayey soil stratum with N value of more than 50
below the aforementioned stratum.
The geological feature around the Old queens Road Bridge is composed by silt ~ sandy soil with N value of
less than 30 between G.L. and 24m from G.L., and diluvial clayey soil ~ highly decomposed granite stratum
with N value of more than 50 below the aforementioned stratum.
The location of boring holes is shown after next page. Boring logs are shown in Data Book
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-39
Figure 18-29 Location of Boring Holes (Nadi Town Bridge)
Th
e P
roject
for
the
Pla
nn
ing
of
the
Na
di
River
Flo
od
Con
trol
Stru
ctures
in
the
Rep
ublic
of
Fiji
YA
CH
IYO
E
NG
INE
ER
ING
C
O.,L
TD
./CT
I E
NG
INE
ER
ING
IN
TE
RN
AT
ION
AL
C
O.,L
TD
. JV
Fin
al
Rep
ort,
Vo
lum
e II
Ma
in
Rep
ort,
Pa
rt II:
Fea
sibility
Stu
dy
18
-40
Fig
ure 1
8-3
0 L
oca
tion
of B
orin
g H
oles (O
ld Q
ueen
s Road
Brid
ge
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-41
(5) Crossing Condition
1) Nadi Town Bridge
The crossing condition of Nadi River as a crossing target is summarized in the following table, and
characteristics of river channel are shown below.
River channel is an Embankment structure.
The site belongs to tidal area so that the construction plan (diversion of water) is to be based on the
mean high water springs of +1.188m
Table 18-11 River Condition (Nadi Town Bridge)
Planned
River
Cross
Section
Notices
Design Flood
Discharge 1400 m
3/sec (1/50)
Standard Span
Length*1
L=20.0m
Design High Water
Level +5.76m Number of Piers
*1 5(Lp/L)
River Width Lp=103.28m
(H.W.L)
Existence of
Neighboring Bridge None
Design Bed Slope 1/4200
Maximum
Impediment Ratio of
River Flow*2
5%
Height of River Bed -1.51m Upper Surface of
Footing of Pier River Bed -2m
*3
Height of Dike +6.76m Discharge at
Performing
Construction
Because of tidal area the
average High Water Level is
applied. Form of River
Chanel Embankment
Crossing Angle 90 deg. High Water +1.188m
*1: Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc., Article 63
*2: ditto, Article 62
*3: Lower of current state and design (ditto, Article 62)
Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-42
2) Old Queens Road Bridge
The crossing condition of Nadi River as a crossing target is summarized in the following table, and
characteristics of river channel are shown below.
River channel is an Engraved structure.
The normal line at the location of bridge is curve.
Table 18-12 River Condition (Old Queens Road Bridge)
Planned
River
Cross
Section
Notices
Design Flood
Discharge 1400 m
3/sec (1/50)
Standard Span
Length*1
L=20.0m
Design High Water
Level +9.73m Number of Piers
*1 4(Lp/L)
River Width Lp=89.40m
(H.W.L)
Existence of
Neighboring Bridge YES
Design Bed Slope 1/2600
Maximum
Impediment Ratio of
River Flow*2
5%
Height of River Bed +0.78m Upper Surface of
Footing of Pier River Bed -2m
*3
Height of Dike +10.73m Discharge at
Performing
Construction
The discharge is estimated
based on the maximum
water level in non-flood season in the past.
Form of River
Chanel
Engraved
(Height of Landside is higher than H.W.L)
Crossing Angle 80 deg. High Water ---
*1: Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc., Article 63
*2: ditto, Article 62
*3: Lower of current state and design (ditto, Article 62)
Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-43
(6) Design Load
The basic requirements for bridge design are specified in “Design Guide – BRIDGE, WHARF, JETTY,
CULVERT AND CROSSING STRUCTURES – June 2015, Fiji Road Authority (hereinafter, FRA
Standards) which was issued as the bridge design standards in Fiji. On the other hand, details are required
to refer “Bridge Manual Third Edition, 2015, The New Zealand Transport Agency” (hereinafter, NZTA
Standards) and so on, to the design standard of New Zealand. Following the above-mentioned standards,
the loading conditions are summarized as shown below.
1) Live Road
a) Road Bridge
The vehicle loading is set up following the NZTA Standards Section 3.2 as shown below.
Figure 18-31 Vehicle Loading
Source: Bridge Manual Third Edition (2014, the New Zealand Transport Agency)
The crowd loading applies 5.0kPa following Section 3.4 of NZTA Standards.
b) Tramline Bridge
The live load for design of Tramline is set up following B4.2 of FRA Standard as shown below.
Figure 18-32 Design Live Load (Tramline Bridge)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-44
2) Wind Road
The wind road refers “AS/NZS 1170.0:2002, Australian/New Zealand Standard”. Basic design wind load is
set up as V=70m/s following the FRA Standard B4.4. The wind direction multiplier is set up as 1.
3) Temperature Variation
Temperature variation is set up as bellow following NZTA Standard 3.4.6.
Steel structure: ±25℃
Concrete structure: ±20℃
4) Seismic Design
The design horizontal seismic load V is set up following FRA Standard, NZTA Standard and NZS
1170.5:2004, New Zealand Standard, December 2004, as shown below.
V=Cμ・Z・R・Sp・Wd≧0.05Wd
where,
Wd: self-weight
Sp: coefficient of structural capacity (compensation coefficient for each ground type)
R: coefficient of dangerousness (significant coefficient)
Z: regional coefficient
Cμ: response spectrum of basic acceleration
5) Combination of load effects
a) Load Combinations and Load Factors for the Serviceability Limit State
b) Since the various loads act the structures at same time in service and in construction, the
disadvantage combination of loads is to be considered. Table 18-13 shows case of
combination and coefficient multiplied to load.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-45
Table 18-13 Load Combination for Serviceability Limit State
c) Load Combinations and Load Factors for the Ultimate Limit State
Table 18-14 Load Combination for Ultimate Limit State
Source: Bridge Manual Third Edition (2014, the New Zealand Transport Agency)
Source: Bridge Manual Third Edition (2014, the New Zealand Transport Agency)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-46
18.6.2 Preliminary Design of Nadi Town Bridge
(1) Summary The bridge concerned is located at the crossing point of primary arterial road of Queens Road over Nadi River (see Figure18-33(1), and it is a 3 span steel cantilever girder bridge + simple span steel girder bridge, of which bridge length is 72.0m, constructed in year 1865 (see Photo18-1, Figure18-33(2)). This bridge was planned to be rebuilt since the clearance below girder had become disable to keep the freeboard due to the shortening of bridge length after maintenance work by river widening. The rebuilt bridge was planned to be located at the same place to the existing bridge due to the limitation of land, and the bridge length was planned to be 108m based on the designed river cross section (see Figure18-34).
The HWL around the rebuilt bridge location is quite high; it is no other way to raise the design vertical alignment higher than existing bridge in order to keep the design freeboard below girder. Also, it was needed to employ the low height girder bridge because the elevation of road surface could not be raised due to the neighboring traffic junction and shopping street with consideration of river block and cost issue. Therefore, 3 span PC continuous post-tension T Girder Bridge was planned considering the past results of successful construction and the cost performance.
Figure 18-33(2) Existing Bridge Side View (Nadi Town Bridge) Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-34 Rebuilt Bridge Side View (Nadi Town Bridge) Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-33 (1)Bridge Location
Photo18-1 Current Bridge
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-47
The pier was planned as oval wall type because the pier was constructed in the river. The foundation was
planned by pile (cast in place pile with casing remained).
(2) Consideration of Road Alignments
1) Design Policy
In this planning project, cross sectional plan, horizontal & vertical alignment are examined, and also the
road alignment for bridge section and approach road section of front & behind the existing bridge is
planned in order not to redo the detailed road & bridge design in the future.
The basic principle in this planning is shown as below.
[Basic Principle]
The number of carriage way should be same to the existing bridge.
The horizontal alignment should not be changed due to the limitation of land.
The vertical alignment should be set up being based on the girder height of the specified type of
below-mentioned superstructure, and the clearance below girder. Also, the approach road of front and
behind the existing bridge is connected to the present earth work section but it is needed not to raise
the elevation of road surface around the neighboring traffic junction and to keep the access to the
neighboring shopping stores and residential houses. For make this realized, with consideration of
mobility, transition toward the existing elevation is considered making the improvement area as
shorter as possible under the applicable standards.
2) Consideration of Road Alignments
The plan and vertical section drawings, which are set up following the above mentioned principal, are
shown in the next page.
Th
e P
roject
for
the
Pla
nn
ing
of
the
Na
di
River
Flo
od
Con
trol
Stru
ctures
in
the
Rep
ublic
of
Fiji
YA
CH
IYO
E
NG
INE
ER
ING
C
O.,L
TD
./CT
I E
NG
INE
ER
ING
C
O.,L
TD
. JV
Fin
al
Rep
ort,
Vo
lum
e II
Ma
in
Rep
ort,
Pa
rt II:
Fea
sibility
Stu
dy
18
-48
Transition at Sta.314
Transition at
Sta.106
Vertical gradient of 8% was
selected to minimize improvement
area and to keep clearance below
girder at the Abutment.
Vertical gradient of 8% was
selected to minimize improvement
area and to keep clearance below
girder at the Abutment.
Overlay about 56cm at the Crossing
Transition at STA.31 Figure 18-35 Design Plan and Side View (Nadi Town Bridge)
Source: JICA Study Team
Clearance below girder
1.04m≧1.0m(OK) at the
location of Abutment
Clearance below girder
1.04m≧1.0m(OK) at the
location of Abutment
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-49
(3) Bridge Planning
1) Location of Abutment
a) Basic Policy Regarding the location of Abutment, it is set up referring the “Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc.” Clause 61.
Location of front face of Abutment: Rear side behind the normal line at high water
Direction of Abutment: Parallel to the Embankment
Bottom of basement: To be installed lower than bottom embankment Normal Line at High Water Embankment
Bottom Embankment Bottom Embankment
Figure-1 Location of Abutment (River Width ≧50m) Figure-2 Division of Embankment and Ground
The followings are assumed for simplification of design and construction.
Bridge length is set up on the center line of road with 1m round.
Bridge height is set up with 0.5m round.
Footing earth cover is kept more than 50cm considering installation of block revetment.
b) Location of Abutment The location of Abutment is set up as below following the above-mentioned principle.
A1 Abutment: STA. 146.000
A2 Abutment: STA. 254.000
Bridge Length: 108.0m
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-50
2) Span Arrangement
a) Basic Policy
Span division is arranged considering structural stability and to minimize the number of piers following the
below principle.
1. Refer the “Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc.”
Arrangement of 6 or less span numbers (5 piers) referring Clause 63 “Span Length”
Blocking ratio by river deposits of 5% or less referring Clause 62
Distance of 10m or more from river bank, slope toe and slope shoulder of low water river bank
referring Clause 62
2. Consideration of actual successful bridge construction results in Fiji
Actual successful construction results in Fiji (around 35m or less precast PC girders)
3. Crossing adjacent to
Minimize the overlay of road surface at crossing adjacent to the bridge.
b) Span Length
Following the above-mentioned principle, the possible-applied span division is such arranged as the 3 cases
below.
2 spans: 2@54m
3 spans: 3@36m
4 spans: 4@27m
The span arrangement is determined as 3 spans [email protected] due to the following reasons.
In case of 4 spans a pier has to be installed within 10m from the end of revetment of river which is
prohibited by law so that the application of this span arrangement is difficult.
In case of 2 spans, the girder height will be very high (2.5~3.6m) and transition with front & rear
embankment will be impossible, in addition to this even if PC Box girder bridge is adopted,
overhanging beam method or launched construction have to be applied. These methods require
scaffolding within the river so that river flow blocking occur. These methods also require large-scale
temporary works for superstructures and are uneconomical comparing with the selected
arrangement. In case of 2 span steel girder bridge, launching is also to be applied because of the
same reason to the above-mentioned type. Therefore this span arrangement is difficult to be applied.
3) Superstructure Type
For study of this bridge structural type, the type of PC Bridge is also examined together with existing steel
bridge types. Moreover, the following 3 cases are picked up considering the actual successful construction
results in Fiji, and also the applied span length as shown in the below Table 18-15.
Table 18-15 Draft Comparison of Bridge Type(Nadi Town Bridge)
Bridge Type Reason of Application
Case-1:PC-3span Continuous Post-Tension T-Girder Common type which is applied in Fiji
Case-2:PC-3span Continuous Component Girder Applicable PC girder type as same as Case-1
Case-3:Steel 3span Continuous Non-Composite Girder Same type to the existing bridge
The result of comparison for the above-mentioned 3 cases from the viewpoints of economy, construction
and maintenance, is shown in Table 18-16 below. Following the result of comparison, Case-1 PC-3span
Continuous Post-Tension T-Girder is selected.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-51
Table 18-16 Comparison & Selection of Bridge Type(Nadi Town Bridge)
Case-1
PC-3span Continuous Post-Tension
T-Girder Bridge
Case-2
PC-3span Continuous Component Girder
Bridge
Case-3
Steel 3span Continuous Non-Composite
Girder Bridge
Typical
Cross Section
Outline of Structures
Because Span max>34m, T girder,
which Flange is wider than I shape
girder, is applied for main beam.
There are past successful results of
construction in Fiji.
T girder is applied for main beam as
same as Case-1 but PC slab is
installed between the girders to reduce Nos. of main beam.
This type of superstructure is
commonly applied in Japan.
Span between girders is arranged to be
less than 3m with I girder, cross frame
and cross beam.
Similar type to existing bridge, many
past successful results of construction
in Fiji.
Method Girder Installation by Erection Beam Girder Installation by Erection Beam Launched Installation of Girders
Construct-a
bility
Girder and beam are fabricated at work yard behind abutment; girders
are installed by erection beam
method. There are many successful
experiences in Fiji.
○
Method of girder installation is same to Case-1.
○
Rail facility is arranged at work yard behind abutment; girders are
launched and installed. Larger
work yard is required, less
constructability
△
Maintena
nce
Durability against decline is higher
than Case-3 because of concrete type and maintenance can be easier.
◎
Maintenance is same to Case-1
◎
Maintenance cost will be more than
other cases due to a steel girder type with many structural
members.
△
Economic Ratio
1.0 ◎ 1.2 △ 1.3 △
Evaluation
This case is selected because of
economic method, many past successful experiences for sure
construction in Fiji. ◎
This case is not selected because of
uneconomic method due to particular form work &
transportation, and also less
experience in Fiji
△
This case is not selected because of
less constructability and more maintenance cost. △
Remarks: ◎:very good, ○:good, △:fair
Source: JICA Study Team
4) Foundation Type
a) Abutment Type
Various types of abutments could be adopted depending on structure heights, supporting soil
conditions, and economic efficiency. Generally, it is said to be appreciate to decide abutment types
depending on the height of structures. Designed heights for abutments of reconstructed bridges would
be between 3.5 and 9.0 meters, and since supporting soil conditions are not good, inverted T-type
(Cantilever Type) abutments would be adopted.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-52
Table 18-17 Abutment Types and Standard Heights
Gravity Type
Semi-gravity Type
Cantilever Type
Counterfort Type
Rigid Frame Type
RemarksAbutment Type10 20 30
Height(m)
Source: JICA Study Team based on Design Procedure of each Regional Development Bureau, Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
b) Pier Types
The pier type is desirable to be long oval type in cross section to avoid disturbance of river flow as
specified in Clause 62 of “Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities,
etc.” so that the wall type pier is adopted6. In consideration of possible future deterioration such as
degradation of stability of the piers by local erosion and the influence on river management facilities,
piers are designed to have footings with sufficient embedment from the riverbed.
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-36 The wall type pier
6 There are some examples of Rahmen type and Pile Bent type pier mainly due to economical reason.
5) Selection of Foundation Type
The foundation type of this bridge is to be pile foundation because the bearing layer exists deeper than
16m~24m from the boring investigation results. The following 3 type of pile foundation is compared based
on the actual construction in Fiji as shown in Table 18-18.
The foundation type of this bridge is to be Case-1: Cast in place Concrete Pile according to the following
reasons.
・Bearing layer is deep
・Load scale is large
・Hearing results from the local contractors’ opinion based on the above conditions
A A
Side view Cross Section A-A
Semicircular nose and tail
Triangular nose and tail
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-53
Table 18-18 Selection of Foundation Type(Nadi Town Bridge)
Case-1:Cast in place Concrete Pile Case-2:H Bearing Pile Case-3:Anchor Pile
Outline
Reinforcing bars and
concrete are installed within
the steel casing.
Main member is H shape
steel column, and pile head
is fixed by spiral bar and
steel casing.
Anchor bars and concrete
are installed within the steel
casing (anchorage to
bearing stratum).
Typical
Sketch
*1
*2
*3
Appropriate
depth (m) Less than approx.60m Less than approx.15m Less than approx.15m
Loading
Scale Middle~Large Small Small
Applicability ○ △ △
Remarks: ○:good, △:fair
Source:*1: Denarau Bridge Project, *2: Vatuboro Bridge Project, *3: Lomawai Bridege Project
Steel Casing H shape
Steel Column
Anchor Bar
Spiral Bars
Reinforcing Bars
Steel Casing
Steel Casing
Concrete
Spiral Bars
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-54
18.6.3 Preliminary Design of Old Queens Road Bridge
(1) Summary The bridge concerned is located at the crossing point of primary rural road of Old Nadi Back Road over Nadi River (see Figure 18-37(1)), and it is a 9 span simple steel bridge, of which bridge length is 99.3m, constructed in year 1936. Width is about 3m and sidewalk was constructed on the overhanging beam additionally. Moreover, tramline also passes on this bridge girder, which span is divided as same to the road bridge, and the substructure is united in one body (see Photo18-2, Figure 18-37(2)). This bridge was decided to be reconstructed because of the following reasons.
Span length is short (maximum span length is 12.3m, pier quantity is 8 nos., meanwhile, the Cabinet Order concerning structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc. specifies; standard span length is 20m, maximum pier quantity is 4 nos.) and because of inconsistency between the direction of river normal line and the direction of piers after the improvement, river flow blockage was anticipated.
Because piers were located within the planned slope, this bridge dose not conform to “Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc.”
Because the foundation was exposed due to the scouring of river bed, structural stability became a big issue.
The reconstructed bridge was planned as below considering the site conditions and planned cross section of the river (see Figure 18-38).
1) Road Bridge Road width was planned as one lane for one side bound as same to the approach road of front and behind the bridge, and the tramline was planned to move to the lower river side due to the land limitation.
The clearance below girder was secured by raise of vertical alignment higher than current elevation because of high HWL. Meanwhile, formation level of road surface was unable to rise because of adjacent cement factory or many residential houses, also river blockage and cost were to be considered; it was required to employ low height girders. Hence, PC 3span Continuous Post Tension I Girder Bridge (bridge length 96m) was planned as the bridge type considering the past successful construction results in Fiji and construction cost.
2) Tramline Bridge “Through bridge type” was selected to secure the clearance below girder because the vertical alignment was unable to change considering the climbing capacity and safe operation of tram.
Steel 3span Continuous Through-Bridge with same span division to Road Bridge was selected as bridge type considering past successful construction results in Fiji and construction cost.
Figure 18-37 (1) Bridge Location
Photo 18-2 Site Photo
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-55
Road Bridge
Figure 18-37(2) Side View of Existing Bridge (Old Queens Road Bridge) Source: JICA Study Team
Road Bridge
Tramline Bridge
Figure 18-38 Side View of Rebuilt Bridge (Old Queens Road Bridge) Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-56
3) Substructure
Planned river normal line (slant angle 80 degrees) was employed for substructures. Road Bridge and
Tramline Bridge were united in one body and spread type was employed for pier foundation because of
shallow bearing stratum. Pile type was employed for abutment foundation because of deep bearing stratum.
(2) Consideration of Alignments
1) Design Policy
In this planning project, cross sectional plan, horizontal & vertical alignment are examined, and also the
road & tramline alignments for bridge section and approach road section of front & behind the existing
bridge are planned in order not redo the detailed road & bridge design in the future. The basic principle in
this planning is shown as below.
[Basic Principle]
Road width was planned as one lane for one side bound as same to the approach road of front and
behind the bridge. Horizontal alignment should be controlled by the land of cement factory on right
bank.
Vertical alignment of road should be controlled by girder height of superstructure type as mentioned
below and the clearance under girder. The transition of alignment is at the approach road section of
front and behind the bridge. The access should be secured limiting raise of road surface around the
entrance of cement factory.
Horizontal alignment of tramline should be parallel to the road and the transition should be toward the
existing road. The vertical transition should be toward the same level to the current condition
considering the climbing capacity and safe operation of tram.
2) Consideration of Alignments
Plan and side view drawings are shown in next page following the above mentioned principle.
Th
e P
roject
for
the
Pla
nn
ing
of
the
Na
di
River
Flo
od
Con
trol
Stru
ctures
in
the
Rep
ublic
of
Fiji
YA
CH
IYO
E
NG
INE
ER
ING
C
O.,L
TD
./CT
I E
NG
INE
ER
ING
C
O.,L
TD
. JV
Fin
al
Rep
ort,
Vo
lum
e II
Ma
in
Rep
ort,
Pa
rt II:
Fea
sibility
Stu
dy
18
-57
Figure 18-39 Plan and Side View (Old Queens Road Bridge)
Source: JICA Study Team
Transition at
STA.106 Transition at
STA.280
Transition at
STA.280 (entrance of
cement factory)
Control point for
horizontal align
–ment (land of
cement factory)
Rail of Tramline
is moved for 2.8m
to lower river
stream side to
secure control
conditions.
Clearance below
girder at A1 =
1.1m > 1.0m (OK)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-58
(3) Bridge Planning
1) Location of Abutment
a) Basic Policy
Regarding the location of Abutment, it is set up referring the “Cabinet Order concerning Structural
Standards for River Management Facilities, etc.” Clause 61.
Location of front face of Abutment: Rear side behind the normal line at high water
Direction of Abutment: Parallel to the Embankment
Bottom of basement: To be installed lower than the line connecting river bed
and top of embankment.
Width equal to top of Embankment
↓Normal Line at High Water
The followings are assumed for simplification of design and construction.
Bridge length is set up on the center line of road with 1m round.
Bridge height is set up with 0.5m round in case of spread footing and 0.1m round in case of pile
foundation.
Footing earth cover is kept more than 50cm considering installation of block revetment.
b) Location of Abutment
The location of Abutment is set up as below following the above-mentioned principle (see Figure 8-98).
A1 Abutment: STA. 151.000
A2 Abutment: STA. 247.000
Bridge Length: 96.0m
Figure -2 Location of Abutment (River Width≧50m) Figure-2 Location of Abutment for Excavated River Bed
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-59
2) Span Arrangement
a) Basic Policy
Span division is arranged considering structural stability and to minimize the number of piers following the
below principle.
1. Refer the “Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities, etc.”
Arrangement of 5 or less span numbers (4 piers) referring Clause 63 “Span Length”
Blocking ratio by river deposits of 5% or less referring Clause 62
Distance of 10m or more from river bank, slope toe and slope shoulder of low water river bank
referring Clause 62. If piers were to be located adjacent to river bank or slope toe of embankment,
or top of slope of low waterway, the revetment should be strengthened if necessary, and river bed
protection or high water protection should be arranged.
2. Consideration of actual successful bridge construction results in Fiji
Actual successful construction results in Fiji (around 35m or less precast PC girders)
3. Crossing adjacent to
Minimize the overlay of road surface at the entrance adjacent to cement factory or residential houses
near the bridge.
b) Span Length
Following the above-mentioned principle, the possible-applied span division is such arranged as the below
3 cases.
2 spans: 2@48m
3 spans: 3@32m
4 spans 4@24m
The span arrangement is determined as 3 spans [email protected] due to the following reasons.
In case of 4 spans a pier has to be installed within 10m from the end of revetment of river which is
prohibited by law so that the application of this span arrangement is difficult.
In case of 2 spans, the girder height will be very high (2.5~3.6m) and transition with front & rear
embankment will be impossible, in addition to this even if PC Box girder bridge is adopted,
overhanging beam method or launched construction have to be applied. These methods require
scaffolding within the river so that river flow blocking occur. These methods also require large-scale
temporary works for superstructures and are uneconomical comparing with the selected
arrangement. In case of 2 span steel girder bridge, launching is also to be applied because of the
same reason to the above-mentioned type. Therefore this span arrangement is difficult to be apply.
3) Superstructure Type
a) Road Bridge
For study of Road Bridge structural type, the type of PC Bridge is also examined together with existing
steel bridge types. Moreover, the following 3 cases are picked up considering the actual successful
construction results in Fiji, and also the applied span length as shown in the below in Table 18-19.
Table 18-19 Comparison of Bridge Type (Old Queens Road Bridge -Road Bridge-)
Bridge Type Reason of Application
Case-1:PC-3span Continuous Post-Tension T-Girder Common type which is applied in Fiji
Case-2:PC-3span Continuous Component Girder Applicable PC girder type as same as Case-1
Case-3:Steel 3span Continuous Non-Composite Girder Same type to the existing bridge
The result of comparison for the above-mentioned 3 cases from the viewpoints of economy, construction
and maintenance, is shown in Table 18-20 below. Following the result of comparison, Case-1 PC-3span
Continuous Post-Tension T-Girder is selected.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-60
Table 18-20 Comparison & Selection of Bridge Type(Old Queens Road Bridge -Road Bridge-)
Case-1
PC-3span Continuous Post-Tension
T-Girder Bridge
Case-2
PC-3span Continuous Component Girder
Bridge
Case-3
Steel 3span Continuous Non-Composite
Girder Bridge
Typical
Cross Section
Outline of Structures
I-section Post Tension girder is applied
for main beam.
There are past successful results of construction in Fiji.
T girder is applied for main beam as
same as Case-1 but PC slab is
installed between the girders to reduce Nos. of main beam.
This type of superstructure is
commonly applied in Japan.
Span between girders is arranged to be
less than 3m with I girder, cross frame
and cross beam.
Similar type to existing bridge, many
past successful results of construction
in Fiji.
Method Girder Installation by Erection Beam Girder Installation by Erection Beam Launched Installation of Girders
Construct-a
bility
Girder and beam are fabricated at
work yard behind abutment; girders
are installed by erection beam method. There are many successful
experiences in Fiji.
○
Method of girder installation is
same to Case-1.
○
Rail facility is arranged at work
yard behind abutment; girders are
launched and installed. Larger work yard is required, less
constructability
△
Maintena
nce
Durability against decline is higher than Case-3 because of concrete
type and maintenance can be easier. ◎
Maintenance is same to Case-1
◎
Maintenance cost will be more than other cases due to a steel
girder type with many structural
members.
△
Economic Ratio
1.0 ◎ 1.3 △ 1.4 ○
Evaluation
This case is selected because of
economic method, many past successful experiences for sure
construction in Fiji. ◎
This case is not selected because of
uneconomic method due to particular form work &
transportation, and also less
experience in Fiji
△
This case is not selected because of
less constructability and more maintenance cost. △
Source: JICA Study Team Remarks: ◎:very good, ○:good, △:fair
b) Tramline Bridge
The type of Tramline Bridge is selected being limited due to conditions of vertical alignment and High
Water Level. Following 3 cases are picked up considering the actual successful construction results in Fiji,
and also the applied span length as shown in the below Table 18-21.
Table 18-21 Comparison of Bridge Type (Old Queens Road Bridge -Tramline Bridge-)
Bridge Type Reason of Application
Case-1:PC-3span Continuous Post-Tension T-Girder Common type which is applied in Fiji
Case-2:PC-3span Continuous Through-Bridge PC girder type applicable to girder height limitation
Case-3:Steel 3span Continuous Through-Bridge Steel girder type applicable to girder height limitation
The result of comparison for the above-mentioned 3 cases from the viewpoints of economy, construction
and maintenance, is shown in Table 18-22 below. Following the result of comparison, Case-3 “Steel 3span
Continuous Through-Bridge” is selected.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-61
Table 18-22 Comparison & Selection of Bridge Type(Old Queens Road Bridge -Tramline Bridge-)
Case-1
PC-3span Continuous Post-Tension
I-Girder Bridge
Case-2
PC-3span Continuous Through-Bridge
Case-3
Steel 3span Continuous Through-Bridge
Typical
Cross Section
Outline of
Structures
I-section Post Tension girder is applied
for main beam.
There are past successful results of construction in Fiji.
Main girder is PC structure as same to
Case-1. The girder height is reduced
by application of Through-Bridge type.
Bridge slab is Through-Bridge type as
same to Case-2 but steel girder is
employed for main girder.
Method Installation by Crane
(on the slab of Road Bridge)
Launched Installation of Girders
(too heavy for Crane installation)
Installation by Crane
(on the slab of Road Bridge)
Construct-a
bility
Girder and beam are fabricated at work yard behind abutment; girders
are installed by crane method. There
are many successful experiences in Fiji.
○
Girders are fabricated at work yard behind abutment and installed by
launched method. There is no
experience in Fiji, heavy and less constructability.
△
Main girders are fabricated behind abutment and installed by crane
method. The lightest weight of
girder makes the constructability well.
○
Maintena
nce
Durability against decline is higher
than Case-3 because of concrete type and maintenance can be easier.
◎
Maintenance is same to Case-1
◎
Many structural members are
needed but maintenance is easier than others because of
Through-Bridge type.
○
Economic
Ratio --*1 - 1.2 △ 1.0 ○
Evaluation --*1 ×
This case is not selected because of
non-experience in Fiji, also the
erection method is limited only by the launched method of no
experience.
△
This case is selected because of
cost performance advantage and
past successful results in Fiji. ◎
--*1: Evaluation is excluded because of Clearance below primary girder cannot be satisfied.
Source: JICA Study Team Remarks: ◎:very good, ○:good, △:fair
4)Foundation Type
a) Abutment Type
Various types of abutments could be adopted depending on structure heights, supporting soil
conditions, and economic efficiency. Generally, it is said to be appreciate to decide abutment types
depending on the height of structures. Designed heights for abutments of reconstructed bridges would
be between 3.5 and 9.0 meters, and since supporting soil conditions are not good, inverted T-type
(Cantilever Type) abutments would be adopted.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-62
Table 18-23 Abutment Types and Standard Heights
Gravity Type
Semi-gravity Type
Cantilever Type
Counterfort Type
Rigid Frame Type
RemarksAbutment Type10 20 30
Height(m)
Source: JICA Study Team based on Design Procedure of each Regional Development Bureau, Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
b) Pier Types
The pier type is desirable to be long oval type in cross section to avoid disturbance of river flow as
specified in Clause 62 of “Cabinet Order concerning Structural Standards for River Management Facilities,
etc.” so that the wall type pier is adopted7. In consideration of possible future deterioration such as
degradation of stability of the piers by local erosion and the influence on river management facilities,
piers are designed to have footings with sufficient embedment from the riverbed.
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-40 The wall type pier
7 There are some examples of Rahmen type and Pile Bent type pier mainly due to economical reason.
A A
Side view Cross Section A-A
Semicircular nose and tail
Triangular nose and tail
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-63
5) Selection of Foundation Type
The foundation type of this bridge is to be pile foundation because the bearing layer exists deeper than 24m
from the boring investigation results. The following 3 type of pile foundation is compared based on the
actual construction in Fiji as shown in Table 18-24.
The foundation type of this bridge is to be Case-1: Cast in place Concrete Pile according to the following
reasons.
・Bearing layer is deep
・Load scale is large
・Hearing results from the local contractors’ opinion based on the above conditions
Table 18-24 Selection of Foundation Type(Old Queens Road Bridge)
Case-1:Cast in place Concrete Pile Case-2:H Bearing Pile Case-3:Anchor Pile
Outline
Reinforcing bars and
concrete are installed within
the steel casing.
Main member is H shape
steel column, and pile head
is fixed by spiral bar and
steel casing.
Anchor bars and concrete
are installed within the steel
casing (anchorage to
bearing stratum).
Typical
Sketch
*1
*2
*3
Appropriate
depth (m) Less than approx.60m Less than approx.15m Less than approx.15m
Loading
Scale Middle~Big Small Small
Applicability ○ △ △
Remarks: ○:good, △:fair
Source:*1: Denarau Bridge Project, *2: Vatuboro Bridge Project, *3: Lomawai Bridege Project
However the foundation of pier is to be placed directly on the bearing layer which exists shallow depth
from riverbed.
Steel Casing H shape
Steel Column
Anchor Bar
Spiral Bars
Reinforcing Bars
Steel Casing
Steel Casing
Concrete
Spiral Bars
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-64
18.7 Approximate Construction Quantity
18.7.1 Approximate Construction Quantity
Approximate Construction Quantity is as mentioned in Table 18-25 and 18-26.
Table 18-25 Approximate Construction Quantity (River Works)
Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity Quantity
Excavation m3 3,928,181.0 1,257,034.5 6,446.0 290,737.0 23,431.0 5,505,829.5
Backfill m3 868,327.0 21,606.0 34,398.0 924,331.0
Embankment m3 328,936.0 1,159,681.3 57,364.0 251,216.0 27,725.0 1,824,922.3
Trimming of slope (Cuting) m2 349,832.7 168,133.6 61,321.0 7,568.0 586,855.3
Stripping topsoil m2 1,375,000.0 305,000.0 37,387.0 222,240.0 12,092.0 1,951,719.0
Gabion m2 - 1,878.8 - - - 1,878.8
Prevent of Crown of levee m2 110,000.0 5,141.9 7,084.0 19,000.0 - 141,225.9
Planting m2 95,760.0 410,498.1 30,807.0 94,236.0 - 631,301.1
Structures Overflow Dike LS - 2 - - - 2
Drainage Sluice Gate LS - 2 - - - 2
Flap Gate LS 8 2 1 1 - 12
Flood Wall Gate LS - - - 1 - 1
Disposal Dozing and Loading m3 2,659,223.0 97,353.2 - - - 2,756,576.2
Transportation m3 2,659,223.0 97,353.2 - - - 2,756,576.2
Embankment m3 2,659,223.0 97,353.2 - - - 2,756,576.2
Coffer Dam m3 752,000.0 - - - - 752,000.0
Temporary Road m2 84,000.0 - - - - 84,000.0
Compensation Works
Pavement pavement (t=0.4m) m² - 6,724.0 - - - 6,724.0
Ⅰ . Approximate Construction Quantity
Quantity of Main Works
Quantity of Temporary Works
Short cut of tributariesItem Main Works Description Unit
Package-1 Package-2 Package-3 Package-4
Surrounding DikeRiver Widening Retarding Basin A, B Ring Dike
Earth Work
Bank Protection
Embankment
Temporary
Work
Total
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-65
Table 18-26 Approximate Construction Quantity (Bridge Works)
No. unit
0000 Earth work
0001 Excavation(soil) m3 15,457 14,646
0005 Backfill(clean sand) m3 4,718 4,649
0007 Banking m3 1,414 990
0009 Cutting (soil) m3 3,890 0
0010 Trimming of slope (Cutting) m2 148 211
0011 Trimming of slope (Banking) m2 318 193
0100 Foudation Work
0103 casing cast-in-place pile(φ1.0m) m 682 630
0200 Substructure Work
0201 cobble foundation of structure excavation(t=0.2m) m2 277 485
0202 levelling concrete(t=0.1m) m2 277 485
0210 abutment/pier base concrete m3 1,458 2,108
0220 form (for wall, pier) m2 1,380 1,738
0221 form (for levelling concrete) m2 15 21
0230 Rebar for the reinforcement of concrete ton 209 301
0300 Superstructure Work
0301 produce,transport & erection of main beam (PC I-Beam, L=32m)unit 0 21
0302 produce,transport & erection of main beam (PC T-Beam, L=36m)unit 21 0
0350 Steel Girder Bridge (Through Bridge)L=96m(3@32m) m2 0 691
0400 Floor Slab Work
0402 floor slab concrete c=400kg m3 555 298
0403 form (for slab) m2 704 969
0404 Rebar for the reinforcement of concrete ton 56 30
0405 supporting (for slab) m2 1,771 1,286
0500 Bridge Attachment Work
0501 bearing unit 42 50
0502 expansion joint m 26 34
0600 Bridge Surface Work
0604 Guard fence m 216 192
0605 Waterproofing m2 1,404 960
0606 Asphalt pavement for bridge 50thick m2 1,404 960
0700 Removal of Existing Bridge Work
0701 concrete bridge breaking work m3 563 294
0702 concrete waste disposition m3 611 335
0703 steel bridge breaking work ton 92 146
0704 Removal of Existing Pile m 400 460
0800 Pavement Work
0801 road upper subbase m2 1,756 3,092
0803 Asphalt pavement for approach m2 1,756 1,200
0850 Tramline Orbit ton 0 17
0900 Temporary Work
0901 Temporary bridge with H beam m2 576 576
0902 Pile with H Beam (H=350) m 35 35
0904 Big sandbag unit 750 420
0905 temporary construction road m2 2,000 2,840
0906 Hume Pipe (φ1.0m) m 0 150
0907 Coffeing Works m3 8,515 3,720
1000 Concrete Work
1011 Concrete 18Mpa m3 632 447
1020 Form m2 1,275 951
1040 Crushed Stone (t=0.2m) m2 538 406
1100 Dike Works
1101 Pavement of Crown of levee m2 264 376
1102 Plant spraying m2 148 211
1200 Revetment Work
1203 Concrete blocks for bank protection m2 918 1,776
1300 Removal of Surplus Soil Works
1301 Dozing and Loading m3 4,700 5,287
1302 Filling materials transport (≦5.5km) m3 4,700 5,287
1303 Banking m3 4,700 5,287
2000 Other Work
2001 removal / relocation of utility pole unit 6 2
item unit
Quantity
No. Nadi Town Bridge Old Queens Road Bridge
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-66
18.7.2 Land Acquisition and Compensation
(1) Land Acquisition In this project, land acquisition is required for Package-1 River Widening, Package-2 Retarding basin A,B, Package-3 Ring Dike, Package-4 Surrounding Dike and Shortcuts of tributaries and Package-5 Rebuilding of Bridges. Approximate area of required land acquisition is as mentioned in Table 18-27. These area are calculated by department of land in Fiji.
Table 18-27 Land Acquisition Area
Short cut of tributaries
Land Acquisition AreaFreehold Land ha 0.00 18.66 - - - - -State Land ha 0.00 20.14 - - - - -Native Land ha #REF! 39.96 - - - - -Agricultural ha - 243.50 1.40 6.69 4.26 -Commercial ha - - - 0.36 - -Residential ha - - - 0.21 - -Others ha - - - 0.04 - -
ha 78.76 243.50 1.40 7.31 4.26 335.22Total
Breakdown by Landownership
Breakdown by Landuse
Ring DikeItem Main Works Description Unit
Unit Price(FJD)
Package-3Surrounding Dike Total
Package-1 Package-4River Widening Retarding Basin A, B
Package-2
Source: Department of Land, Fiji
(2) Compensation House relocations for river widening and construction of embankment is required in Package-1 River Widening and Package-2 Retarding Basin A,B of which number of house relocations are as shown in Table 18-27.
In addition, there are some houses in downstream which is affected negatively by the Priority Project but not affected directly. The number of affected houses is also as shown in Table 18-28.
Table 18-28 Number of house relocations and affected houses Section Number
Package-1 River Widening 6 houses (house relocations) Package-2Retarding Basin A,B 11 houses (house relocations) Ring Dike 17 houses (affected houses)
Source: JICA Study Team
18.8 Construction Planning The components of the Priority Project (see Figure 18-41) are mainly divided into 2(two) categories such as River Works and Bridge Works. Therefore, construction scheme of execution is planned each other.
<River Works> <Bridge Works> (1)River Widening (6) Rebuilding of Nadi Town Bridge (2)Retarding Basins (7) Rebuilding of Old Queens Road Bridge (3)Surrounding Dike (4)Ring Dike (5)Shortcuts of Tributaries
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-67
S
Malakua River
⑥Rebuilding of Bridge ①River Widening: L=13km
Figure 18-41 The Components of the Priority Project (Structural Measures)
18.8.1 River Works
(1) Contents of ConstructionMain construction works of river works of the Priority Project is as mentioned in Table 18-29.
Table 18-29 Main works of river works of the Priority Project Construction Work Item Work Break down
1.Preparatory Work ・Equipment Yard ・Construction management office, Worker dormitory, electricity, Water and sewerage
2.Temporary Work ・Temporary Road, Slope ・Coffer dam, Temporary relocation of water path, Large sandbags Temporary relocation of water path, Large sandbags
3.Earth Work, Excavation ・Remove trees/roots, demolish existing structures, scrape topsoil, Excavation, disposal of waste soil
4.River Facilities 4.1 Embankment 4.2Overflow dike, Drainage Sluice, Outlet, Flood Gate, etc.
4.3Bank Protection
・Embankment, Compaction ・Main overflow dike work, front aprons, bed protection work ・Sidewall protection, crest concrete ・Main sluiceway work, flap gate work ・Concrete block bank protection ・Gabion protection
5. Subsidiary work ・Flood Water Gate
(2) Construction Section Construction work under this Project has been divided into four (4) major construction sections, some of which is divided into smaller construction sections. Construction sections are as shown in Table 18-30 and Figure 18-42. Contents of works and quantities are as previously mentioned in Chapter 18, 18.7.
Among them, a river channel widening construction of Package-1 is the largest construction, of which construction volume of excavation is 3.9 million m3. The construction plan of Priority Project is much affected by the period of construction of Package-1 so that the construction of Paccage-1 is examined in this section. The construction section Package-1 is divided into 3 sub-section, P1-1,P1-2 andP1-3 considering the location of the existing 2 bridges, location of approximately same work quantity for each sub-section.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-68
Table 18-30 Division of Construction Section
Construction Sections Contents of Works
Major Section Break Down
Package-1
River Widening
P1-1 Downstream section of River
Widening (Nadi River:5.0~9.75k)
・River Widening (Excavation and Embankment)
P1-2 Middle stream section of River
Widening (Nadi River:10.0~14.0k)
・River Widening (Excavation and Embankment)
P1-3 Upstream section of River
Widening (Nadi River:14.0~18.75k)
・River Widening (Excavation and Embankment)
Package-2 Retarding Basin A,B Section ・Construction of Retarding Basin A,B
Package-3 Ring Dike Section ・Construction of Ring Dike
Package-4
Surrounding Dike
and shortcuts of
tributaries Section
P4-1 Surrounding Dike Section ・Construction of Embankment at left bank side of Nadi
River
・Construction of Embankment at right bank side of Nawaka
River
P4-2 Shortcuts of tributaries Section ・Shortcuts of tributaries
Package-5
Rebuilding of Bridge Section
・Rebuilding of Nadi Town Bridge (Namotomoto Bridge)
・Rebuilding of Old Queens Road Bridge
Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-69
【Package-1】P1-1Downstream section of River
Widening (Nadi River:5.0 to 9.75k)
【Package-2】Retarding Basin A,B
Section
【Package-5】Rebuilding of Bridge Section
(Nadi Town (Namotomoto) Bridge)
Nadi Town
Nalakua River
【Package-3】Ring Dike Secion
【Package-4】P4-2Shortcuts of tributaries
Section
【Package-5】Rebuilding of Bridge Section
(Old Queens Road Bridge)
【Package-4】P4-1Surrounding Dike Section
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-42 Division of Construction Section
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-70
(3) Construction Step Construction Step of Package-1is as shown in Figure 18-43.
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-43 Construction Step
(4) Construction method and contents of each step
1) Preparatory Works and Construction Procedures to related agencies Preparation work involves making arrangements for the main construction. Whether it is done properly or not has a huge effect on the efficiency, quality, economic efficiency and schedule of the construction. It is an extremely important part of proper construction management.
When work permits are needed prior to beginning construction, procedures for related agencies must be carried out promptly with the number of days required for prior deliberations taken into account.
2) Preparatory Surveying (Groundbreaking Survey) Before construction starts, preparatory surveying is done to verify compliance with design drawings. If preparatory surveying reveals inconsistencies with design drawings, the causes of those inconsistencies will be surveyed and proper actions taken promptly.
a) Setting Water Level Markers Temporary water level markers will be set up using distance markers or the foundations of structures and
START
Preparatory Works, Construction procedures
Preparatory Surveying (Groundbreaking Survey)
Temporary Works, Finishing Stakes
Excavation Work
Embankment Work
Structures Work
Clearing Work
END
Main Works
Removing Trees/Roots, Topsoil Scraping/Excavation
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-71
other immovable objects. When such objects are not usable, temporary water level markers will be installed.
They will be set up outside of construction areas on solid ground where there is no chance that they will be
compromised by general traffic, and they require proper protection.
Positions of temporary water level markers will be determined by measuring the water level at existing
water level markers and confirming positions by referencing at least one other existing water marker;
temporary water markers cannot be placed unless this confirmation is done.
b) Setting Temporary Coordinates
Coordinate markers will be set up in addition to distance markers where necessary. As with the temporary
water level markers, they will be set up outside of construction areas. These temporary markers will be
placed upon confirming the positions of river structures and such with reference to design drawings.
Boundary markers and water survey markers will be verified before any measuring work is done. Boundary
markers may be broken, removed or become lost if there is a time lapse between work site acquisition and
start of construction, resulting in discrepancies. Thus, markers need to be verified to make sure that they are
in the correct positions. In addition, implementing agencies must be consulted and proper measures taken
before repositioning existing distance markers or water level markers when construction requires them to
be repositioned.
3) Removing Trees/Roots
Trees and roots will be removed by hand and by machine. Removed Trees and roots will be loaded into
dump trucks by hand or by backhoes (with thumbs attached) and transported to a temporary dumping area
(distance of one kilometer or less). Temporary dumping areas for Trees and roots will be set up at
one-kilometer intervals throughout construction zones. At temporary dumping areas, Trees and roots will be
fed through wood chippers, and the chips will be strewn about the slopes by machine to reuse them as
vegetation base material. Roots will be dug out by bulldozers with rippers and piled up. Roots will be
loaded into dump trucks by backhoes (with thumbs attached) and transported to temporary dumping areas.
Roots will also be fed through wood chippers, finely chopped and strewn about the slopes by machine to
reuse them as vegetation base material.
4) Topsoil Scraping/Excavation
Bulldozers will scrape the topsoil from the tops of slopes toward the bottoms efficiently (30-50 centimeters
thick). Then, the bulldozers will scrape 30-50 centimeters of topsoil from the flood channel and pile it up
every 100 meters or so along the flood channel. That dirt will be transported to dumping areas within a
distance three kilometers by wheel loaders or dump trucks. After topsoil scraping, bulldozers will excavate
again in the same order and pile up that dirt along the flood channel in the same way as in the topsoil
scraping. That dirt will be piled up every 100 meters or so along the flood channel and then transported to
embankments by wheel loaders or dump trucks. After excavation, the bulldozers will shape the slopes by
compacting them and shape the flood channel (keeping drainage in mind and making slopes drain in the
direction of the channel).
5) Finishing Stakes
Finishing stakes serve as references in the course of working on structures and must remain in place during
construction. They must be inspected regularly and verified and corrected when doubts exist.
As a rule, finishing stakes will be placed at 10-meter intervals on straight reaches of the channel and at
five-meter intervals on curved and other complicated reaches, but it is best to place them at closer intervals
when necessary.
6) Excavation Work
a) Excavation of riverbank
Excavation will be done by backhoe and soil will be loaded on dump truck and transported to embankment
point of river bank or retarding basins. When soil contains water and it is not suitable for embankment
materials, soil will be temporarily placed for drying.
If excavation will be done by bulldozers, bank excavation will be done by bulldozers from crown to foot.
The construction formation level will be excavated after slope excavation is complete. Dirt will be piled up
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-72
Dump truck(maximum pay load 11t) Wheel loader
on the construction formation level.
The elevation of construction level will be higher than average maximum sea level or the level which does not inundated in dry season and construction period including freeboard, and it is utilized as temporary construction road.
Source: JICA Study TeamFigure 18-44 Excavation Method
b) Excavation of riverbed and water way When it is difficult to excavate riverbed and waterway, excavation will be done with dry conditions and sump pit and cofferdam work with earth dike or sandbags and such will be done at the same time.
The elevation of cofferdam shall be higher than average maximum sea level or the level which does not inundated in dry season and construction period including freeboard. The elevation of cofferdam is as mentioned later in (5)2).
c) Loading and Transportation Excavated soil piled up will be loaded into dump trucks by wheel loaders. The soil will be transported to embankments or to dumping areas based on dirt transportation plans.
General disposal soil will be diverted to materials for embankment or backfilling. Transportation distance shall be within about 5km on average and impact to tourism and environment in surrounding area shall be considered because Nadi is tourism-oriented town and tourism and environment is very important. Construction temporary road will be installed with 4m width along the river or on construction formation level by utilizing the river channel widening area as temporary work space.
Source: JICA Study TeamFigure18-45 Loading and Transportation Method
7) Embankment Before building embankments, topsoil at banking locations will be scraped and banking soil prepared. Soil excavated from the vicinity will be used for embankment.
Soil transported from excavation is by dump trucks will be dumped in places where embankments are planned and compacted by bulldozers. Then, it will be re-compacted with tire rollers.
It will be rolled to a thickness of 35 centimeters and finished to a thickness of 30 centimeters, and compacted by tire roller. Embankment work will be done in approximately 50-meter segments. After soil is embanked, slopes will be shaped and compacted by backhoes as design cross section.
Bulldozer
Bulldozer
Construction Formation Level
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-73
1 lot=50~100m
Single layer
Finish thickness=30cm
Dump truck
(maximum pay load 11t)Multi-wheel roller
Embankment
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-46 Embankment Method
8) Structures Work
a) Bank Protection (Revetment for Bridge Section)
In principle, structural work will be done during dry season. Excavation of lower part than river water level
will be done by using coffer dam or large sandbags. If spring occurs, make a sump pit for drainage and it
will be drained by temporary pump.
After excavation is completed, soil will be spread to requisite dimensions and compacted. Then, riprap and
chippings will be spread if required in that order and compacted to the requisite thickness. After that,
foundation work, side flame and top flame work will be done and finally concrete block of surface will be
installed.
b) Drainage Sluice Gate, Outlet, Flap Gate and so on
i. Excavation of Foundation for Structures
As same as bank protection work, in principle, structural work will be done during dry season. Excavation
of lower part than river water level will be done by using coffer dam or large sandbags. If spring occurs,
make a sump pit for drainage and it will be drained by temporary pump.
Most excavation will be done by backhoes, and foundation excavation and leveling will be done by hand.
Open excavation will be done on slope surfaces and the bottoms of foundations will be leveled and
compacted. Then, they will be filled with riprap and chippings, compacted, and covered with blinding
concrete.
Backhoe 0.35~0.45m3
Embankment width
Embankment
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-74
Overflowlevee
Broken stone
Temporaryplacing
Backhoe 0.35~0.45m3
Sand bag
Drainage pump
Broken stone
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-47 Construction Method for Foundation of Structures
ii. Concrete Placement for Structures Concrete will be poured by chute, crane or pump truck. Ready-mix concrete will be purchased from a manufacturer in the area.
Overflowlevee
Broken stone
Temporaryplacing
Backhoe 0.35~0.45m3
Sand bag
Drainage pump
Broken stone
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-48 Construction Method for Concrete Placement
(5) Temporary Works
1) Temporary Construction Road General, primary roads will be used as construction roads, and new construction roads will also be built. Construction roads will be 4.0 meters wide within the banks of the river. Broken stone will be laid to a thickness of 20-30 centimeters to create roadbeds fully capable of supporting dump trucks.
When temporary construction road is installed in excavation area within river channel, elevation of the road is higher than the elevation which shall not be inundated during construction and shall be as same as height of temporary coffer dam which height is set as average maximum sea level in the five-year period between 2010 and 2014 (1.118m) and plus freeboard (0.5m). When temporary construction road is also used as coffer dam, width shall be 5.0m for safety. (see (5)2) and Figure 18-51)
In addition, when temporary construction road is installed in river channel, it is required to avoid an obstacle in water flow during the construction period and to be installed as required minimum size (height and width). If there is a need to be forced higher and wider, it must be removed before rainy season starts.
Steel plates will be placed as necessary to ensure traffic ability of construction roads and within construction areas.
Excavation for Structures
Temporary Earth Dike
Temporary Earth Dike
Concrete pump and mixercar
Concrete
Structure
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-75
Temporary cross-river
road
Colgate pipe Concordant discharge
Low flow channel width
When building detour roads outside of construction areas, consideration must be given such that the
construction itself is not inhibited and also that road capacity does not suffer. Implementing agencies must
be consulted to set up safety facilities and signage as the situation demands.
Dump truck
(maximum pay load 11t)
Construction road
Landside
or High water bed
Crushed stone
t=20~30cmW=4~5m
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-49 Temporary Construction Road
If necessary, corrugated pipes, large sandbags and excavation soil will be used to build construction roads
which cross the river to ensure that the river can be crossed during construction. River-Crossing roads will
be constructed and used during dry season and must be removed before rainy season starts.
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-50 Temporary Construction Road for River-Crossing
2) Temporary Coffer Dam
Temporary coffer dam will be installed when it is required to dry up to excavate riverbed and parts near
water path and construct structures under water.The temporary coffer dam must be installed during dry
season and it must be removed before rainy season. The height of it is set as average maximum sea level in
the five-year period between 2010 and 2014 (1.118m)8 and plus freeboard (0.5m). The height is set as
average maximum sea level because it is higher than highest water level in dry season in past five dry
seasons. Width of temporary coffer dam is set as 5.0m considering usage as temporary construction road for
safety.
The height of coffer dam in upstream section is to be H=1.3m including freeboard (0.5m) since the area is
not affected by tide and the maximum past water level in non-flood season is estimated approximately
0.8m.
8 In the time of the study, the mean high water spring in Lautoka in the recent five years (2010~2014) is converted to the
elevation of 1.188m ( refer to 「Draft Final Report: Main Report, Part I: Master Plan Study, Chapter5, 5.3 Current Discharge
Capacity Analysis, 5.3.1 Setting of the Conditions for the Analysis」).
t=30cm
φ2.0m etc.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-76
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-51 Cross Section of Temporary Coffer Dam
Typical specifications of temporary coffer dam in each section are mentioned in Table 18-31. Temporary
coffer dam is installed, if required, considering construction conditions.
Table 18-31 Typical specifications and work quantity of temporary cofferdam
Crest Width 5.0 m 5.0 m 5.0 m 5.0 m
Ave.Height 3.5 m 2.5 m 1.3 m 1.3 m
Slope Gradient 1: 1.0 1: 1.0 1: 1.0 1: 1.0
Width of Bottom 12.0 m 10.0 m 7.6 m 7.6 m
Area 29.8 m2 18.8 m2 8.2 m2 8.2 m2
Transition 80 m 80 m 80 m 80 m
General section 4,750 m 4,000 m 4,750 m 5,000 m
sub total 4,830 m 4,080 m 4,830 m 5,080 m
143,693 m3 76,500 m3 39,558 m3 41,605 m3 301,355 m3
Total
Shape
Length
Eearth Volume
Section
SpecificationsP1-1 P1-2 P1-3 P2
The mean high water spring and water level of river flow are confirmed as shown in Table 18-32.
The observed water level data of river flow without tidal effect exists only at Votualevu station (at the point
of 27.06km, during past 4 years). The maximum water level in non-flood season is estimated as El.+0.7m
at Nadi Town Bridge by applying the present riverbed gradient to the maximum water level at Votualevu
station, which is lower than the mean high water spring El.+1.118m
Table 18-32 Comparison of Mean High Water Spring and Maximum Water Level in
Non-flood Season
Distance from
Votualevu Station
Difference
(height)
Water Level
(Maximum)
Gauge
readingElevation
Adjust
ValueL1 ⊿h1 Elevation
(m) (EL.m) (m) (m) (m) (EL.m) (EL.m)
2011 2.325 9.979 1/ 4200 :9.83k-16.75k - -
2012 4.049 11.703 1/ 4200 :16.75k-17.00k 0.67 < 1.118
2013 3.262 10.916 1/ 1350 :17.00k-25.00k - -
2014 0.987 8.641 1/ 630 :25.00k-27.06k - -
Average
maximum
sea level
Nadi Town Bridge (9.83k)
Water Level (Maximum)*year
Gradient of Current Riverbed
I
Votualevu Observation Station (27.06k)
17,230 11.037.654
3) Drainage for construction works
Drainage for construction works includes draining spring water, standing water, groundwater and rainwater
at excavation sites and expansion sites in construction areas and on transportation routes. Problems with
drainage in civil engineering work carried out by machines are very closely related to the efficiency and
quality of the work, so the most up-to-date considerations must be given to draining construction areas.
Unlined drainage ditches will be dug to drain standing water and other surface water to areas outside banks.
Most situations do not call for large-scale drainage facilities; construction methods, sequences and the
progression of the schedule should account for drainage, and a flexible approach is needed to account for
the weather.
Crown
Coffer Dam
Average maximum sea level 1.118m
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-77
4) Temporary Facilities
There are two (2) types of temporary facilities; those directly related to construction and those indirectly
related.
a) Directly Related Temporary Facilities
i. Rebar/Formwork
Rebar and formwork fabrication yards are temporary facilities related to concrete. Permanent roofs must be
installed over the yards to prevent exposure to rain and sunlight.
ii. Machinery, Heavy Machinery
Repair shops for maintaining, inspecting and repairing machinery and heavy machinery are required. As
with the yards above, these shops must have permanent roofs to prevent exposure to rain and sunlight.
Particular care must be taken to set aside places to store fuels and oils used.
iii. Temporary Bridges
Temporary bridges will be built to detour traffic around bridge construction.
iv. Drainage Work
Temporary pumps will be used to drain spring water and other water that appears after cofferdams are built.
b) Indirectly Related Temporary Facilities
i. Offices, Laboratories, Storehouses, Garages
Offices, laboratories, storehouses, garages, oil and fuel storage and transformer stations will be built within
construction areas and as part of the construction schedule. Related laws and regulations will be observed
as these facilities are built. Particular care must be taken to prevent theft when handling hazardous
materials. These facilities will not be built outside the banks.
ii. Lodging
Lodging will be built to accommodate the number of workers. Care must be taken to observe related laws
and regulations and prevent pollution to the environment as these facilities are built. These facilities will
not be built near the banks.
iii. Electricity
Power supply facilities on work sites are required to provide electricity for machinery facilities,
construction lighting, water supply and drainage, cut-and-cover and office lighting.
5) Disposal Site
According to the site survey, confirmed candidates of dumping area are the following nine (9) locations.
Topsoil stripping soil occurred in excavation of river bank is transported to disposal sites and general soil is
diverted to materials for embankment and backfilling, and surplus soil is transported to disposal sites.
The disposal site is selected considering securing possibly relative wide area without residence around the
area and the lowland ,depression, low level terrace with lower level than the around ground height.
Though approx. 2.7 million m3 surplus soils are generated in this project, it is acceptable by these disposal
sites since total amount of acceptable volume becomes approx. 2.4 million m3 (h=2.0m) except proposed
town boundary area, approx. 3.0 million m3 (h=2.0m) including proposed town boundary area and approx.
3.5 million m3 (h=3.0m).
However, it is required that possibility for use as disposal site shall be reviewed with related agencies and
land owner during detailed design stage.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-78
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-52 Proposal Area for disposal sites
Table 18-33 Acceptable total volume of disposal soil (Rough Estimation)
Area at Bottom Area at crest HeightGradient of
slopeVolume
(m2) (m2) (m) 1:n (m3)
Down stream A 76,405 74,091 1.0 75,248
76,405 71,812 2.0 2.0 148,217 (a)
76,405 69,569 3.0 218,961 (i)
Down stream B 449,776 444,057 1.0 446,916
449,776 438,370 2.0 2.0 888,146 (b)
449,776 432,716 3.0 1,323,738 (ii)
Middle stream C 210,603 206,307 1.0 208,455
210,603 202,045 2.0 2.0 412,648 (c)
210,603 197,815 3.0 612,627 (iii)
Middle stream D 174,146 170,118 1.0 172,132
174,146 166,119 2.0 2.0 340,266 (d)
174,146 162,151 3.0 504,446 (iv)
Middle stream E 165,789 162,302 1.0 164,045
165,789 158,846 2.0 2.0 324,635 (e)
165,789 155,422 3.0 481,818 (v)
Middle stream F 220,583 215,972 1.0 218,278 Proposed Town Boundary Area
220,583 211,390 2.0 2.0 431,973 (f)
220,583 206,836 3.0 641,129
Upstream G 71,378 68,473 1.0 69,925
71,378 65,598 2.0 2.0 136,976 (g)
71,378 62,754 3.0 201,198 (vi)
Upstream H 94,047 91,437 1.0 92,742 Proposed Town Boundary Area
94,047 88,861 2.0 2.0 182,908 (h)
94,047 86,319 3.0 270,549
Upstream I 69,718 67,021 1.0 68,369
69,718 64,364 2.0 2.0 134,082 (i)
69,718 61,748 3.0 197,200 (vii)
2.0 2.0 2,384,970 =(a+b+c+d+e+g+i), except Proposed
Town Boundary Area
2.0 2.0 2,999,851 =(a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h+i), including
Proposed Town Boundary Area
3.0 2.0 3,539,988 =(i+ii+iii+iv+v+vi+vii), except
Proposed Town Boundary Area
Remarks
Total Amount
Right bank side of
Nadi River
Right bank side of
Nadi River
Right bank side of
Nadi River
Right bank side of
Nadi River
Left bank side of
Nadi River
Right bank side of
Nadi River
Left bank side of
Nadi River
Left bank side of
Nadi River
Left bank side of
Nadi River
Area Left/Right
Embankment shape of surplus soil
Source: JICA Study Team
Upstream I Upstream G
Middle stream H
Middle stream E
Middle stream D
Middle stream F
Middle stream C
Downstream B
Downstream A
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-79
“Proposed Town Boundary Area” is the area where is the expansion area of town by Nadi town and there is a possibility that the land-use planning and the like have been made newly. Therefore, it shall be reviewed with related agencies and land owner during detailed design stage
Source: Nadi Town Council
Figure 18-53 Boundary of Nadi Town (Existing and Proposed)
(6) Work Schedule
1) Construction Step for river widening Construction time scheduling of Package-1 River Widening is studied because its construction quantity is huge and largest and it becomes critical factor in time schedule of implementation of this project. It should be noted that constructions of others of the Package-2 to 5 is carried out at the same time in parallel with Package-1.
River widening will be done through a whole year by changing the earth work contents such as excavation parts and height in dry season and rainy season. Rainy season is assumed to December to March and during rainy season, the excavation of river bank which elevation is higher than average maximum sea level 1.188m will be done. Safety shall be considered highly enough during rainy season construction. During dry season, the excavation of river bank which elevation is lower parts using cofferdam will be done. In case that excavation is done by backhoe on coffer dam but backhoe reach is insufficient, it is required that excavation shall be done by dredger or dry up by coffer dam, which will be reviewed during detailed design. In case that coffer dam is required, coffer dam shall be installed following the specifications previously mentioned in (5)2). Coffer dam is installed during dry season and it must be removed before rainy season. Construction step is as described in Figure 18-54 and 18-55.
Embankment is constructed through whole year, but be careful so as not to interfere with other construction works such as excavation.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-80
Figure 18-54 Construction Step (1)
<Shut up river water by using coffer dam>
STEP-3 Completion
Embankment EmbankmentStep-1: Inatallation of Coffer Dam
Step-2: Excavation
▽(1.118m)+0.5m (freeboard)
Embankment Embankment
▽(1.118m)+0.5m (freeboard)
Step-4: Removal of Coffer Dam
Step-3: Excavation
Figure 18-55 Construction Step (2)
STEP-0 Current Condition
STEP-1 Rainy Season
STEP-2 Dry Season
<Shut up river water by using excavation parts>
Current Cross Section
Excavation Area higher than the average
maximum sea level in the five-year
period between 2010 and 2014 (1.118m)
▽Average maximum sea level in the five-year period between 2010 and 2014 (1.118m)+0.5m (freeboard)
Embankment Embankment
Step-1: Excavation
lower part of slope
Step-2: Removal of
temporary coffer dam
Utilization as
temporary coffer dam
Embankment Embankment
▽(1.118m)+0.5m (freeboard)
Leave water side part to utilize
it as temporary coffer dam
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-81
2) Planning Conditions
a) Increase coefficientof workable days
The increase coefficient of workable day is assumed as constant through year considering non-workable
days such as holidays and suspended day by rainfall which is estimated by the rainfall data during recent 5
years.
Daily rainfall at Nadi Airport Observation Station where is nearest to the construction area in the last past
five years is summarized as mentioned in Table 18-35. Using these rainfall volume and number of rainfall
days, suspended days by rainfall are calculated by using the ratio mentioned in Table 18-34. In addition, by
adding the number of holiday in a year, total suspended days are calculated in a year. Increase coefficient of
workable days is 1.7 through a year.
Table 18-34 Suspended days (ratio) by rainfall Works Suspended Days due to Rainfall
Rainfall (mm) Main Works
0 0.00
0-5 0.00
5-10 0.75
10-15 0.75
15-20 0.75
20-25 1.00
25-30 1.00
30- 1.50 Source: JICA Study Team The above table of values are set taking into
consideration other of yen loan similar projects,
weather condition and labor situation in Fiji.
Table 18-35 Calculation of increase coefficient of workable days
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0 13.6 8.2 10.2 16.2 20.2 24.0 26.4 23.4 21.2 19.4 14.4 12.4
0-5 6.4 8.0 9.4 6.6 7.2 2.0 2.8 5.6 4.8 6.6 8.6 8.0
5-10 2.2 3.4 4.2 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.4 1.4 3.2
10-15 1.8 1.8 0.8 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.8 1.8 2.2
15-20 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.6 1.6
20-25 1.8 0.6 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.8 0.2
25-30 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6
30- 4.0 4.0 3.8 1.6 1.6 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.8 0.8 2.2 2.6
Total Days of Month 31.0 28.2 31.0 30.0 31.0 30.0 31.0 31.0 30.0 31.0 30.0 30.8
Rest by Rain 11.8 12.4 11.8 6.9 4.1 4.2 1.9 2.0 3.8 4.7 7.2 10.0
Rest Days by Rain 12 13 12 7 5 5 2 2 4 5 8 10
Sunday 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
National Holiday 2 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2
18 17 16 14 9 10 6 6 8 10 13 16
13 11.2 15 16 22 20 25 25 22 21 17 14.8
2.4 2.5 2.1 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.8 2.1 1.7
2.3 1.5 Rainy Total
Coefficient for cariculation of
work days Dry Season Avarage: Rainy Season Avarage:
Suspended by
Rain
Suspended by
Holiday
Suspended Days
Woekable Days
Average Days in 5 year (2009-2013)Rainfall (mm)
Category
Source: JICA Study Team
b) Working hours per day
Working hours per day is set as an eight‐hour day.
c) Assumed Heavy Equipment and Daily Construction Execution Volume
Heavy equipment is selected referring to civil engineering cost estimation criteria, Ministry of Land,
Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Selected heavy equipment is mentioned in Table 18-36 considering
construction volume and construction condition.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-82
[Selection of Heavy Equipment]
Machine Main Works Suitable Construction Volume Specifications, Class Daily Construction
Execution Volume
Bulldozer Excavation and dozing Less than 30,000m3 20t class 320m3 More than 30,000m3 32t class 710m3 Backhoe Excavation and Loading Less than 50,000m3 Piled 0.8m3(Flat piled 0.6) 300m3 More than 50,000m3 Piled 1.4m3(Flat piled 1.0) 500m3 Source: Civil engineering cost estimation criteria, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism
Table 18-36 Selected Heavy Equipment
Construction Section Heavy Equipment
Bulldozer Backhoe P1:River Widening 32t class
Daily Construction Execution Volume: 710m3
Piled 1.4m3(Flat piled 1.0)) Daily Construction Execution
Volume: 500m3 P2:Retarding Basin A,B 32t class
Daily Construction Execution Volume: 710m3
Piled 1.4m3(Flat piled 1.0) Daily Construction Execution
Volume: 500m3 P3:Ring Dike 20t class
Daily Construction Execution Volume: 320m3
Piled 0.8m3(Flat piled 0.6) Daily Construction Execution
Volume: 300m3 P4-1:Surrounding Dike of Nadi Town 20t class
Daily Construction Execution Volume: 320m3
Piled 0.8m3(Flat piled 0.6) Daily Construction Execution
Volume: 300m3 P4-2:Shortcuts of tributaries 20t class
Daily Construction Execution Volume: 320m3
Piled 0.8m3(Flat piled 0.6) Daily Construction Execution
Volume: 300m3
In the above table, although daily construction execution volume of 32t class bulldozer is 710m3, it becomes possible by supported by a 1.4m3 class backhoe and 0.8m3 class backhoe in the actual site. In the construction planning at detailed design stage, pay attention to these combinations.
3) Work Schedule Calculation result of construction period of Package-1 is as shown in Table 18-36 and those of other packages are also shown in Table 18-37.
Though total construction period depends on the number of input (number of equipment), in Package-1 which construction volume is the largest, six parties each of the heavy machinery of the combination (bulldozer 32t class, backhoe 1.4m3 and 0.8m3 class) for each left bank side and right bank side is required and it takes approx. four (4) years to complete civil works in case of that condition. In addition, it is required two (2) backhoes (0.8m3 class) for coffer dam.
Work schedule is as described in Table 18-38.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-83
Table 18-37 Construction Period (River Work)
Day Month
(m3/日) (m3) (days) (days) (month)
P1-1
Installation of Coffer
Dam600 143,693 3 80 1.7 136.0 4.5
Removal of Coffer
Dam600 143,693 3 80 1.7 136.0 4.5
Excavation 710 1,781,637 12 210 1.7 357.0 11.9
Embankment and
Backfilling320 424,593 6 222 1.7 378.0 12.6
P1-2
Installation of Coffer
Dam600 76,500 3 43 1.7 74.0 2.5
Removal of Coffer
Dam600 76,500 3 43 1.7 74.0 2.5
Excavation 710 1,218,717 12 144 1.7 245.0 8.2
Embankment and
Backfilling320 276,153 6 144 1.7 245.0 8.2
P1-3
Installation of Coffer
Dam600 39,558 6 11 1.7 19.0 0.6
Removal of Coffer
Dam600 39,558 6 11 1.7 19.0 0.6
Excavation 710 927,827 12 109 1.7 186.0 6.2
Embankment and
Backfilling320 496,517 6 259 1.7 441.0 14.7
P2Installation of Coffer
Dam600 41,605 6 12 1.7 21.0 0.7
Removal of Coffer
Dam600 41,605 6 12 1.7 21.0 0.7
Excavation 710 1,257,035 5 34 1.7 58.0 1.9
Embankment and
Backfilling320 1,159,681 4 87 1.7 148.0 4.9
P3 Excavation 320 6,446 2 3 1.7 6.0 0.2
Embankment and
Backfilling300 78,970 2 37 1.7 63.0 2.1
- - - - - -
P4-1 Excavation 320 290,737 2 51 1.7 87.0 2.9
Embankment and
Backfilling300 285,614 2 53 1.7 91.0 3.0
- - - - - -
P4-2 Excavation 320 23,431 2 37 1.7 63.0 2.1
Embankment and
Backfilling300 27,725 2 47 1.7 80.0 2.7
- - - - - - -
Number of
Equipments
(Nos)
Package SectionMain Earth
Works
Construction
Execution
Volume
Construction
VolumeWork Day
Ratio
Construction Period
Ring Dike
P4
Surrounding
Dike &
Shortcut
Surrouding Dike of
Nadi Town
Shortcuts of tributaries
P1
River
Widening
P2
Retarding
Basin
P3
Ring Dike
River Widening in
downstream section
River Widening in
middle stream section
River Widening in
upstream section
Retarding Basin A,B
Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-84
Table 18-38 Work Schedule(River Work)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
(day) (Month) 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
P1-1
河道拡幅下流工区
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
272 9.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Earth Work Excavation 357 11.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 378 12.6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
180 6.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
P1-2
河道拡幅中流工区
Preparation 30 1.0 1 1 1
Access Road 30 1.0 1 1 1
148 4.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Earth Work Excavation 245 8.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 245 8.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
180 6.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
P1-3
河道拡幅上流工区
Preparation 30 1.0 1 1 1
Access Road 30 1.0 1 1 1
38 1.3
Earth Work Excavation 186 6.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 441 14.7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Structures 180 6.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
42 1.4 1 1 1 1
Earth Work Excavation 58 1.9 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 148 4.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
270 9.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
Earth Work Excavation 6 0.2 1
Embankment 63 2.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
90 3.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
Earth Work Excavation 87 2.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 91 3.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
270 9.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
Earth Work Excavation 63 2.1 1 1 1
Embankment 80 2.7 1 1 1 1 1
180 6.0
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Pack
ag
e
Section Main Work Item
Construction
Periond
1 year 2 year 3year 4year
Coffer dam (Installation & Removal)
Structures
Coffer dam (Installation & Removal)
Riv
er
Wo
rk
P1
Riv
er W
iden
ing
Coffer dam (Installation & Removal)
Structures
Structures
P4-2
Structures
Structures
P3
Rin
g D
ike P3
Structures
P2
Reta
rdin
g B
asi
n P2
Coffer dam
P4
Su
rro
un
din
g D
ike &
Sh
ort
cu
t
P4-1
Dry Season Dry SeasonDry Season Dry Season
Drainage Suluice Gate Overflow Dike
Fabrication of Flood Wall Gate Installation of Flood Wall Gate
Flap Gate for drainage
Flap Gate for drainage and small river
Flap Gate for drainage and small river
Rainy Season Rainy Season RainyRainy Season Rainy Season
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-85
(7) Disposal Planning In this project, approx. 2.7 million m3 disposal soils from Package-1 and approx. 100 thousand m3 disposal soils will occur. Excavation is main work of this project and it is required that disposal soils are properly transported and treated within construction period. Proposed disposal sites and capacity is previously mentioned in (5)5).
In this clause, disposal days and number of dump tracks required is roughly calculated. Prior to the calculation, these conditions are set as preconditions.
a) Preconditions Dump truck will be selected as transportation machine. 10t to 15t class dump truck is applied in and around residential area and 32t class dump truck is applied in and around suburban area considering efficient transportation. (Necessity of dredger is also considered at the detailed design stage)
Disposal sites are to be selected most closest one from each construction section as mentioned in Table 18-39 and disposal soils are transported by routes as described in Figure 18-56.
Construction temporary road is installed along the river or in the excavation area as previously mentioned in (5)1). In addition, since river water level is low during dry season, if possible, a river crossing road as previously described in (5)1) in order to increase transportation efficiency (to shorten transportation distance and time) and to mitigate impact surrounding environment. In this case, the transport distance is 5km or less from each section.
Table 18-39 Disposal Sites Construction
Section Disposal Sites Acceptable volume for disposal
P1-1 Downstream A, B Total 1,000,000m3 (h=2m) P1-2 Middle stream C, D, E, F, H Total 1,900,000m3 (h=2m, 3m) P1-3 Middle stream C, D, E, F, H P-2 Upstream G,I Total 230,000m3 (h=2m)
It is assumed that dump trucks are to be waited for each party in each construction section and a few dump trucks are to be waited in each party.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-86
【Package-1】P1-3Upstream sectionof River Widening (Nadi River:14.0
to 18.75k)
B
【Package-1】P1-1Downstream section of River
Widening (Nadi River:5.0 to 9.75k)【Package-2】
Retarding Basin A,B Section
【Package-1】P1-2Middle stream section of River
Widening (Nadi River:10.0
to 14.0k)
A
C
F
D
E
G
H
I
A~IDisposal Site
Transportation Route in the rivearea or along the riverside
Transportation Route onexisting road
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-56 Routes of Disposal Transportation
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-87
b) Disposal days and number of dump tracks
Number of days and dump trucks required for disposal based on above preconditions are calculated and
result of them is as mentioned in Table 18-40.
Table 18-40 Number of Transportation Days and Dump Trucks for Disposal
P-1 River Widening
2,700,000 m3
981,818 m3 785,455 m3 932,727 m3 2,700,000 m3
32 t 15 t 32 t
1.8 t/m3 1.8 t/m3 1.8 t/m3
17.8 m3 8.3 m3 17.8 m3
55,159 nos 94,634 nos 52,401 nos 202,194 nos
12 party 12 party 12 party
2 nos 2 nos 2 nos
144 nos/day 144 nos/day 144 nos/day 432 nos/day
383.0 days 657.2 days 363.9 days 1,404.1 days
12.8 months 21.9 months 12.1 months 46.8 months
1.1 years 1.8 years 1.0 years 3.9 years1)
Amount of disposal soils are divided propotionally by section distance ratio
P-2 Retarding Basin A, B
100,000 m3
100,000 m3 100,000 m3
10 t
1.8 t/m3
5.6 m3
17,858 nos 17,858 nos
5 party
2 nos
60 nos/day 60 nos/day
297.6 days 298 days
9.9 months 10 months
0.8 years 1 years1) Amount of disposal soils are divided propotionally by section distance ratio
Number of Working Dump Truck per day ― ―
Requied Days for Disposal
― ―
― ―
― ―
Number of Party ― ― ―
Number of Dump Truck per party ― ― ―
Time required for a round-trip incl. work 0.33 hr +1.0hr = 1.33 hr ― ― ―
Number of round-trip per day 8 hr ÷ 1.33 = 6.01 → 6 times ― ― ―
―
Time for loading and unloading 1.0hr ― ― ―
Total number of Dump Trucks ― ―
Time required for a round-trip 5km/30(km/hr)*2=0.33 hr ― ―
Dump truck load capacity ― ― ―
―
Class of Dump Truck ― ― ―
Unit volume weight of the soil ― ― ―
Disposal Planning Total
Total Disposal Volume ―
Disposal Volume
in each section1)
P2 ― ― ―
―
Number of Party ―
Number of Dump Truck per party ―
Number of Working Dump Truck per day
Requied Days for Disposal
Time required for a round-trip incl. work 0.33 hr +1.0hr = 1.33 hr ―
Number of round-trip per day 8 hr ÷ 1.33 = 6.01 → 6 times ―
Total number of Dump Trucks
Time required for a round-trip 5km/30(km/hr)*2=0.33 hr ―
Time for loading and unloading 1.0hr ―
Class of Dump Truck ―
Unit volume weight of the soil ―
Dump truck load capacity ―
Disposal Planning Total
Total Disposal Volume ―
Disposal Volume
in each section1)
P1-1 P1-2 P1-3 ―
River Flow
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-88
18.8.2 Bridge Works
(1) Nadi Town Bridge The outline of construction process of Nadi Town Bridge is as shown as follows. At first for the present traffic, the detour including temporary bridge is secured in the downstream of the existing bridge. After remove the existing superstructure of the existing bridge from on the bridge, the river water is diverted to prepare construction yard in the river. Then the exiting substructure is demolished and new substructure is constructed. The superstructure can be constructed by election girder method in spite of flood season from the election yard kept on the right bank.
The followings are taken care in the construction work. A1 Abutment is located adjacent to the urban area and A2 Abutment is adjacent to the residential houses and primary school as the local condition of Nadi Town Bridge. The traffic volume of Queens Road, which the concerning bridge is located, is quite heavy because of primary road in the region. The area of bridge construction is a tidal river section.
Hereunder, the flow of bridge rebuilding, principle of construction at each step, and typical construction period are explained considering the above-mentioned site conditions.
1) Construction Process The construction process flow of this bridge is shown in Figure18-57. River improvement work is under planning at the bridge rebuilding location but it is implemented separately from this bridge because of excessive length.
Figure 18-57 Construction Flow(Nadi Town Bridge)
START
Temporary Bridge / Detour
Removal of Superstructure
River flow diversion / inside work yard
Removal of piers
Removal of foundation
Construction of foundation
Construction of piers
Construction of superstructure
Removal of Temp. Brdg./ Detour
E N D
Temporary bridge should be arranged at the lower stream side due to the site condition.
Utilities (waterworks, sewage pipe, phone, and telecom) along the existing bridge should be relocated to temporary bridge.
Removal of superstructure should be carried out from bridge slab.
Rebuilding work
One side on either bank of river should be diverted, existing substructure is removed, and new substructure is built. After that, opposite side of bank is built continuously.
Removal Work
Newly constructed PC Post-Tension T girders should be done by method of girder installation with erection beam.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-89
STEP-1: Temporary Bridge, Detour, Removal of existing Superstructures
STEP-2:Construction of New Abutments
STEP-3: Removal of existing Abutments
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-90
STEP-4: Diversion of River Water, Preparation of Work Yard at Right River Bank
STEP-5: Removal of existing Pier (P3)
STEP-6: Reconstruction of new Pier (P3)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-91
STEP-7: Revetment for River Right Bank
STEP-8: Transition of River Flow / Preparation of Work Yard at Left River Bank
STEP-9: Removal of existing Pier (P1 & P2)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-92
STEP-10: Reconstruction of New Pier P1
STEP-11: Revetment for River Left Bank / Removal of Work Yard
STEP-12: Construction of new Superstructure / Removal of Temporary Bridge and Detour
Figure 18-58 Construction Step (Nadi Town Bridge)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-93
2) Temporary Work Plan The detour route to secure the current traffic is selected as shown in Figure 18-59.
Figure 18-59(1) 58Detour Route (Nadi Town Bridge)
The road width of detour route is set up as shown figure below considering the existing bridge cross section. A width of temporary bridge is same as present bridge as shown in Figure 18-59(2)
Figure 18-59 (2) Detour Planning (Nadi Town Bridge)
Formation level of work yard is taken
as H.W.+1.0m.
A1
A2
Residential Area
Existing Road(Photo18-3)
Construction Yard
Detour
Construction Yard
Primary School
Photo18-3 Existing Road at Left Bank
Current Condition (View from A1 side)
2000 6000
3000 3000 [Pedestrian] [Carriage Way]
8000
Width of Detour and Temporary Bridge
Road Width of Existing Bridge (after Investigation) Example of Temporary Bridge
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-94
3) Removal Plan of Existing Bridge The structural dimension of existing bridge is summarized in Table 18-41 and the bridge general drawing is shown in Figure 18-60 Since the As-Built drawings are not obtainable; confirmed numeric values by the site investigation are shown in the drawing.
Table 18-41 Structural Dimension of Existing Bridge(Nadi Town Bridge)
Item Dimension / Description
Bridge Length L=72.800m
Span Division 18.4m+23.3m+17.8m+13.8m
Width 10.390m (Both Side Pedestrian, W=1.7m)
Type of Bridge Steel 3-span Gerber Girder Bridge + Steel Simple Span Bridge
Type of Substructures
Reversed T type Abutment (assumed), Pile Bent Pier *type and size of foundation is unknown
Completion February 1965
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-95
Figure 18-60 General Drawing of Existing Bridge(Nadi Town Bridge)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-96
Basic plan and principle for removal of superstructure, substructure and foundation of existing bridge are shown below.
a) Removal of Superstructure Superstructure is removed by the crane which installed on bridge deck (Figure 18-61).
The removal works are basically carried out by 3 steps; 1. Handrails and Accessories, 2. Bridge Slabs, 3. Primary Girders
The bridge slab and primary girder will be removed being divided into pieces at points of welding, Gerber Hinges and supports to reduce the size of heavy equipment, consideration of surrounding environment, constructability and safety concerning.
Removal work is carried out from A1 side between A1 and P1 (till Gerber Hinge) due to narrow work space at A1 side. Removal work between P1 and A2 is carried out from A2 side.
Each removal section repeats “bridge slab removal primary girder removal next section removal”.
Bridge slab is cut and divided into pieces by concrete cutter, and then removed and carried out.
Temporary Bent will be installed when primary girder is removed if necessary in order to secure safety. Each support and connection at Gerber Hinge will be divided by cutter in advance to primary beam removal.
Figure 18-61 Removal Plan of Superstructure (Nadi Town Bridge)
6 1
Removal& Carry out to A2 Side
5 2 3 4
1 2 3 456
Removal& Carry out to A1 Side
N Sequence of removal
N Placement of crane at removal
Gerber Hinge
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-97
b) Removal of Substructures and Foundations
For removal of existing abutment, approach to the abutment should be from rear side of abutment and (1) base excavation, (2) removal of structural body, (3)removal of pile foundation, (4) backfill are carried out in turn.
Temporary access road to river bed is prepared before removal of piers. Basic conditions of access road and routes are shown below. (Figure 18-62).
width:4.0m(carriage way 3.0m, shoulder 0.5m)
vertical incline: 10% (for consideration of heavy equipment)
Piers should be removed after one side of river bank is dried by cofferdam using sand bags etc., as mentioned in Clause 1) above. New substructure is reconstructed within the cofferdam after the existing substructure is removed.
The formation height of embankment elevation is set up as H.W. +1.0m. The formation setting is shown in 18.8.1(5)2). This section is tidal area so that the mean high water springs is higher than the water level of river flow (estimation value) in non-flood season. The structural body of substructure is removed by demolition by giant breaker and transportation.
The existing pile foundation should be basically pulled out and removed but may be cut off below the formation level of river bank if removal is difficult.
4) Construction Plan of Substructures The plan of new substructure and foundation is shown in Table 18-41 and the general drawing for rebuilt bridge is shown in Figure 18-63.
Table 18-42 Plan of new Substructure and Foundation (Nadi Town Bridge)
Item Type Remarks
Abutment Inverted T Refer to18.6.2(3)4)a)
Pier Wall Refer to 18.6.2(3)4)b)
Foundation Cast-in place Pile Refer to 18.6.2(3)5)
Construction Road
(A1 Side)
A1
A2Construction Road
(A2 Side)
Detour
Figure 18-62 Access Road Plan (Nadi Town Bridge) Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-98
Figure 18-63 General Drawing of New Bridge (Nadi Town Bridge)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-99
The type of foundation should be Cast-in-Place Concrete Pile as mentioned above, and be constructed (1) installation of outer steel casing (by Diesel Hammer method, Figure 18-64), (2) earth excavation within the casing, (3) installation of reinforcing bar cage, (4) concrete casting, in turn.
Figur
Figure 18-64 Example of Pile Construction (Pile driving by Diesel Hammer) Source: provided by local contractor
Reversed T type Abutments and Wall type Piers are planned, and these are constructed; (1) base excavation, (2) footing construction, (3) construction of structural body, (4) backfill, in turn after the construction of pile foundation.
Concrete is cast in place by Chute in case of close distance, and by Crane in case of long distance or high place, and by Concrete Pump & Mixer in case of long distance & large quantity.
5) Erection Plan of Superstructure Erection plan of superstructure is summarized in Table 18-43.
Table 18-43 Superstructure Reconstruction Plan (Nadi Town Bridge)
Item Dimension / Description
Bridge Length L=108.000m
Span Division [email protected]
Width 13.000m (Both Side Pedestrian, W=1.5,3.0m)
Type of Bridge PC-3span Continuous Post Tension T Girder Bridge
Erection Method Girder Installation by Erection Beam
The method of girder installation by erection beam is employed for reconstruction of superstructure because this bridge is river crossing bridge and also it is difficult to install the girder below the existing beams. (Figure 18-65).
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-100
Figure 18-65 Example of Girder Installation by Erection Beam
(Left: Girder Fabrication at Work Yard on site, Right: Installation of Girder by Erection Beam)
Source: provided by local contractor
Fabrication of primary girders is planned at the work yard which can be secured behind the A2
Abutment.
Superstructure is erected in turn as; (1) site survey (confirmation of as-built substructure), (2)
installation of supports, (3) temporary rail laying, fabrication of erection beams, (4) fabrication of
primary girders, (5) installation of erection beams, (6) pull-out of primary girders, (7) primary
girder setting (repeat (4)~(7) as same nos. to girders), (8) move erection beam to next span
(repeat (4)~(8) as same nos. to span), (9) removal of erection beams, (10) transverse beams,
bridge slab (refer to Figure 18-66).
The election girder method is that PC girder fabricated in the back yard of abutment is moved by
pre-installed election girder and shifted laterally and installed to the scheduled position by the
hanging girder device. Therefore the temporary works such as temporary support which block
river cross section is not required and the election work can be done above water level so that
construction can be done through a year.
When bridge slab is reconstructed, utilities should be restored.
Vehicle and pedestrian traffic by detour passing should be returned to new bridge after the
superstructure is completed, and then the temporary bridge is removed.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-101
PLAN VIEW
Anchor for Leg
Anchor Fitting
PC steel bar
Leg Support Bracket
Anchor for Leg
Dolly
Erection Girder
Tifor
Portal Lifting Equipment
Hanging Girder Fitting
Chain Block
Trolley
Leg Support Bracket
SIDE VIEW
PLAN VIEW
Track rail Segment Dolly Dolly
Segment Connecting Yard
Erection Girder
Hanging Girder Device
Strut Wire
Anchor for Strut
Wire
Hanging Girder Device
Strut Wire
Launching Machine
Segment Connecting Yard
Erection Girder
Erection Girder
Launching Machine
Launching Machine
Center Distance of Hanging Girder Device
Figure 18-66 Example of Supere
Structure Election
Cross Section of A1 Bracket of A1 Abutment PLOT PLAN of Leg Support
Bracket of A1 Abutment
CROSS SECTION VIEW
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-102
6) Process Scheduling
The outline of construction schedule is as shown in Table 18-44. The substructure in the present river
channel is to be constructed in dry season. The superstructure is constructed by the election girder method
over the water surface and from behind of abutment so that the construction can be done through a year.
Table 18-44 Process Scheduling (Nadi Town Bridge)
1 2 3 45 6 7 8 9 10 11 121 2 3 4 5 6
Clear Works
Temporary
Bridge3
MItem
Removing
Temporary Bridge1.5
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year
Preparatory
Works
Detour
Removing Existing
Superstructure
7 8 9 10
24 25 26 27 28 2914 15 16 17 18 19
1
10
0.5
0.5
3 4
0.5
2.5
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
2.5
34 35 36
Abutments
Works
Removing
Existing Abutments
Coffering Works
1 2 3 4
30 31 32 33
Removing
Existing P3 Pier
Construction
P2 Pier
5 6 7 8
Revetment Works
Right Bank
Coffering Works
9 10 11 1211 12
1
1
1 2 20 21 22 235 6 7 8 13
Revetment Works
Left Bank
Superstructure
Erection Works
Removing
Detour
9 10 11 12
Removing
Existing P1 & P2 Pier
Construction
P1 Pier
Dry Season Dry SeasonDry Season
Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-103
(2) Old Queens Road Bridge The outline of construction process of Queens Road Bridge is as shown as follows. At first for the present traffic, the detour including temporary bridge is secured in the downstream of the existing bridge. After remove the existing superstructure of the existing bridge from on the bridge, the river water is diverted to prepare construction yard in the river. Then the exiting substructure is demolished and new substructure is constructed. The superstructure can be constructed by election girder method in spite of flood season from the election yard kept in west side (A1 abutment side). The tram line bridge is elected by crane from the road bridge surface.
The followings are taken care in the construction work. A2 Abutment of Old Queens Road Bridge is located adjacent to the cement factory and private houses along the existing road, and the Old Nadi Back Road, where this bridge is placed, is the primary road of this region. The Road is taking function to connect Queens Road and Nadi Back Road; the traffic volume is much. Hereunder, the flow of bridge rebuilding, principle of construction at each step, and typical construction period are explained considering the above-mentioned site conditions.
1) Construction Process The construction process of this Road Bridge and Tramline Bridge, are shown in Figure 18-67 and
18-68.
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-67 Construction Flow(Old Queens Road Bridge)
START
Temporary Bridge / Detour
Removal of Superstructure
Preparation of access road into river bed
Removal of piers
Removal of foundation
Construction of foundation
Construction of piers
Construction of superstructure
Removal of Temp. Bridge/Detour
E N D
Temporary bridge should be arranged at the lower stream side due to the site condition.
Utilities (waterworks pipe, phone, and telecom) along the existing bridge should be relocated to temporary bridge. Removal of superstructure should be carried out from bridge slab; Tramline Bridge first and Road Bridge second.
Rebuilding work
Removal and rebuilding of substructure should be carried out basically in dry season (April ~ November). Average river water level at work place in dry season is low (result of monitoring), removal of existing bridge should be carried out after drain pipes are installed at water flow area and after preparation of work yard.
Removal Work
Newly constructed PC Post-Tension I girders for Road Bridge should be erected by method of girder installation with erection beam. After Road Bridge is completed, the steel girder for Tramline Bridge is erected by crane on this bridge slab.
(1) Tramline Bridge (2) Road Bridge
(1) Road Bridge (2) Tramline Bridge
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-104
STEP-1: Temporary Bridge, Detour, Removal of existing Superstructures
STEP-2: Removal of existing Abutments and Reconstruction of new Abutments
STEP-3: Arrangement of Access Road into Rive
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-105
STEP-4: Removal of existing Piers (P3~P6)
STEP-5: Reconstruction of New Piers (P1~P2)
STEP-6: Removal of existing Piers (P1, P2, P7, P8), Construction of Revetment
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-106
Figure 18-68 Construction Step Flow (Old Queens Road Bridge)
STEP-7: Removal of Access Road
STEP-8: Reconstruction of Superstructure (Road Bridge, Tramline Bridge), Removal of Temporary Bridge and Detour Road
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-107
2) Temporary Work Plan The detour route to secure current traffic and Tramline is selected as shown in Figure 18-69.
Figure 18-69 Detour Route (Old Queens Road Bridge) The road width of detour route is set up as shown below figure considering the existing bridge cross section. A width of temporary bridge is same as present bridge as shown in Figure 18-70.
Figure 18-70 Detour Planning (Old Queens Road Bridge)
Current Condition (View from A2 side)
Road Width of Existing Bridge (after Investigation)
Width of Detour and Temporary Bridge
8000
1000 3000 1500 1500 [Footpath] [Traffic Lane] [Allowance] [Tramline]
5000 3000
Example of Temporary Bridge
Photo18-4 Private House at Right BankA1
A2
Cement Plant
Private House
Construction Yard for Superstructure
Detour (Road)
Private House
Detour (Tramline)
Bus Company
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-108
3) Removal Plan of Existing Bridges The structural dimension of existing bridge is summarized in Table 18-45 and the bridge general drawing is shown in Figure 18-71. Since the As-Built drawings are not obtainable; confirmed numeric values by the site investigation are shown in the drawing.
Table 18-45 Structural Dimension of Existing Bridge (Old Queens Road Bridge)
Item Dimension / Description
Bridge Length L=99.300m
Span Division [email protected]+12.1m+12.3m+9.3m
Width Road Bridge 3.05m(Carriageway)+1.1m(Overhang Sidewalk)
Tramline Bridge 0.93m
Type of Bridge
Road Bridge 9span Steel Girder Bridge (RC Bridge Slab)
Tramline Bridge 9span Steel Girder / Slab Continuous Bridge
Type of Substructures Single line pile Abutment (assumption), Pile-bent type Pier, Foundation type: RC Pile (300x300),length is unknown
Completion 1936 Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-109
Figure 18-71 General Drawing of Existing Bridge (Old Queens Road Bridge)
River Flow
River Flow
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-110
Basic plan and principle for removal of superstructure, substructure and foundation of existing bridge are shown below.
a) Removal of Superstructure Superstructure is removed by the crane which installed on bridge deck of Road Bridge. The work space is secured by installation of H columns & covering plate after the curb of Road Bridge is cut out preliminary, because the out-rigger of crane cannot be extended due to the narrow road width of 3.05m.
Removal work is carried out from A2 toward A1 in one-way because the entrance of cement factory and private houses are adjacent to the bridge at backside of A2 Abutment (see Figure 18-72).
The removal works are basically carried out by 5 steps; 1. Sidewalk on the over-hang beam, 2. Bridge Slab of Tramline, 3. Primary Girder of Tramline Bridge, 4. Bridge Slab of Road Bridge, 5. Primary Girder of Road Bridge
Connection points at support of each substructure are preliminary cut and divided into pieces by concrete cutter.
Bridge slab and primary girders (transverse) are divided by slab cutter in advance because of size reduction of heavy equipment, and then removed and carried out.
Source: JICA Study Team
Figure 18-72 Plan for Removal of Superstructure (Old Queens Road Bridge)
b) Removal of Substructure and Foundation
For removal of existing abutment, approach to the abutment should be from rear side of abutment and (1) base excavation, (2) removal of structural body, (3) removal of pile foundation, (4) backfill, are carried out in turn.
Temporary access road to river bed is prepared before removal of piers. Average river water level at work place is low, removal for substructure & foundation of existing bridge should be carried out after drain pipes are installed at water flow area and after preparation of work yard.
Basic conditions of access road and routes are shown below
width: 4.0m (carriageway 3.0m, shoulder 0.5m)
vertical incline: 10% (for consideration of heavy equipment)
arrangement of access: at upper river stream side of A2 Abutment (less negative
influence to adjacent private houses and easy to access)
The structural body of substructure is removed by demolition by giant breaker and transportation.
②
② ①
①
③④⑤⑥⑦⑧
③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧
⑨
⑨
N Sequence of removal
N Placement of c
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-111
The existing pile foundation should be basically pulled out and removed but may be cut off below
the formation level of river bank if removal is difficult.
Drain pipe of φ2.5m×3 is to be installed with estimating water level・discharge from the past
maximum water level in non-flood season at the site. The formation of work yard in the river is
assumed h=3.5m by securing the 1.0m of soil cover. The calculation results of water level・discharge is as shown in Table 18-46.
There is observation data of water level of river flow without tidal effect in only Votualevu
station (at point of 27.6km, during past 4 years) so that the water depth at Old Queens Road
Bridge is estimated h=0.822 (El.+2.322) applying the maximum water level at the station and
riverbed gradation. This water level is lower than the formation of work yard (El.+3.5m) and soil
cover of drain pipe is also secured. In this case the discharge is Q=33.7m3/s and drain pipe
ofφ2.5m×3nos. is required, The river channel here is engraved one so that if the water level・discharge is over than the estimated one in non-flood season inundation outside of bank will not
occur.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-112
Table 18-46 Estimation of Water Level and Discharge in Non-flood Season in Diversion Work(Old Queens Road Bridge)
Distance from
Votualevu Station
Difference
(height)
Water Level
(Maximum)
Average
RiverbedWater Depth Area Gradient Roughness Velocity Discharge Diameter
Install
Gradient
Water
Depth
Roughnes
sDischarge Number
Total
Discharge
Gauge
readingElevation
Adjust
ValueL2 ⊿h2 Elevation h3 A i n V Q1 φ i
(90%)
h4n q N Q2
(m) (EL.m) (m) (m) (m) (EL.m) (EL.m) (m) (m2) (m/s) (m3/s)
2011 2.325 9.979 1/ 4200 :9.83k-16.75k - - - - - - - - (m) (‰) (m) (m3/s) (m3/s)
2012 4.049 11.703 1/ 4200 :16.75k-17.00k 2.322 1.5 0.822 17.124 0.000238095 0.060 1.968 33.7 < 2.5 2.0 2.25 0.014 12.2 3 36.6
2013 3.262 10.916 1/ 1350 :17.00k-25.00k - - - - - - - -
2014 0.987 8.641 1/ 630 :25.00k-27.06k - - - - - - - -
Hume Pipe
Water Level (Maximum)*
I
7.654 10,310 9.38
year
Votualevu Observation Station (27.06k)
Gradient of Current Riverbed
Old Queends Road Bridge (16.75k)
※The discharge in diversion work is to be verified again in the detail design stage based on the up-to-date data and the timing of diversion as well as the possibility of
obtaining temporary work material (hume pipe with diameter ofφ2.5m).
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-113
4) Construction Plan of Substructures The plan of new substructure and foundation is shown in Table 18-47 and the general drawing for rebuilt bridge is shown in Figure 18-75.
Table 18-47 Plan of new Substructure and Foundation (Old Queens Road Bridge)
Item Type Remarks
Abutment Inverted T Refer to 18.6.3(3)4)a)
Pier Wall Refer to 18.6.3(3)4)b)
Foundation Cast in place Concrete Pile (Abutment), Spread Footing (Pier)
Refer to 18.6.3(3)5)
Source: JICA Study Team
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-114
Figure 18-74 General Drawing of New Bridge (Old Queens Road Bridge -Road Bridge-)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-115
Figure 18-75 General Drawing of New Bridge (Old Queens Road Bridge -Tramline Bridge-)
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-116
he type of foundation for Abutment should be Cast-in-Place Concrete Pile as selected in above Clause 18.6.3 (3)4, and be constructed (1) installation of outer steel casing (by Diesel Hammer method, Figure 18-76), (2) earth excavation within the casing, (3) installation of reinforcing bar cage, (4) concrete casting, in turn.
Figure 18-76 Example of Pile Construction (Pile driving by Diesel Hammer)
Source: provided by local contractor
Reversed T type Abutments and Wall type Piers are planned, and these are constructed; (1) base excavation, (2) footing construction, (3) construction of structural body, (4) backfill, in turn after the construction of pile foundation.
Concrete is cast in place by Chute in case of close distance and by Crane in case of long distance or high place, and by Concrete Pump & Mixer in case of long distance & large quantity.
5) Election Plan of Superstructure Erection plan of new superstructure is summarized in Table 18-48.
Table 18-48 Superstructure Reconstruction Plan (Old Queens Road Bridge)
Item Dimension / Description
Bridge Length L=96.000m
Span Division [email protected]
Width Road Bridge 10.000m (Sidewalk at one-side, W=1.5m)
Tramline Bridge 7.800m
Type of Bridge
Road Bridge PC 3span Continuous Post Tension I Girder
Tramline Bridge Steel 3span Continuous Through-Bridge
Erection Method
Road Bridge Girder Installation by Erection Beam (1st)
Tramline Bridge Girder Installation by Crane (2nd) Source: JICA Study Team
The method of girder installation by erection beam is employed for reconstruction of superstructure of Road Bridge because this bridge is river crossing bridge and also it is difficult to install the girder below the existing beams (Figure 18-77).
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-117
Figure 18-77 Example of Girder Installation by Erection Beam
(Left: Girder Fabrication at Work Yard on site, Right: Installation of Girder by Erection Beam)
Source: provided by local contractor
Construction of Tramline Bridge is carried out on the bridge slab of Road Bridge after this bridge
is constructed in advance as mentioned in Clause 8.5.7(4)1).
Fabrication of primary girders for Tramline and Road Bridges is planned at the work yard which
can be secured behind the A1 Abutment
Superstructure of Road Bridge is erected in turn as; (1) site survey (confirmation of as-built
substructure), (2) installation of supports, (3) temporary rail laying, fabrication of erection beams,
(4) fabrication of primary girders, (5) installation of erection beams, (6) pull-out of primary
girders, (7) primary girder setting (repeat (4)~(7) as same nos. to girders), (8) move erection
beam to next span (repeat (4)~(8) as same nos. to span), (9) removal of erection beams, (10)
transverse beams, bridge slab.
The election girder method is that PC girder fabricated in the back yard of abutment is moved by
pre-installed election girder and shifted laterally and installed to the scheduled position by the
hanging girder device. Therefore the temporary works such as temporary support which block
river cross section is not required and the election work can be done above water level so that
construction can be done through a year.
Tramline Bridge is constructed in turn as; (1) site survey (confirmation of as-built substructure),
(2) installation of supports, (3) fabrication of primary girder, (4) installation by crane, (5) bolting,
(6) bridge slab.
When bridge slab is reconstructed, utilities should be restored.
Traffic of Road and Tramline Bridges passing by detour should be returned to new bridge after
construction of Road and Tramline Bridges are completed, and then the detour road (including
temporary bridge) is removed.
6) Process scheduling
The outline of construction schedule is as shown in Table 18-49. The substructure in the present river
channel is to be constructed in dry season. The superstructure is constructed by the election girder method
over the water surface and from behind of abutment so that the construction can be done through a year.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-118
Table 18-49 Process Scheduling (Old Queens Road Bridge)
43 44 45 46 474th Year
482 3 4
37 38 39 40 41 42
RemovingExisting P1,2,7,8Pier
0.5
5 6Item M
1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 365 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 1011 12 1 2 3 4 411 12 9 10 11 121 2 3 85 6 1 2 3
3
PreparatoryWorks
1
745 6 7
AbutmentsWorks 2
Detour 1
TemporaryBridge
Coffering Works 0.5
Removing ExistingSuperstructure 6
RemovingCoffering Works
0.5
RemovingExisting P3-P6 Pier 0.5
11 12
Revetment WorksBoth Banks 1.5
ConstructionP1-P2 Pier 3
RemovingExisting Abutments 0.5
0.5
SuperstructureErection Works 16
17 8 9 10
Clear Works 0.5
RemovingTemporary Bridge 1.5
RemovingDetour
Dry Season Dry Season Dry Season
Tramline Operable Period Tramline Operable Period Tramline Operable Period
Dry Season
Source: JICA Study Team
18.8.3 Whole Construction Work Schedule Whole Construction Work Schedule of this project which is combined river work and bridge work is as described in Table 18-50.
The Project for the Planning of the Nadi River Flood Control Structures in the Republic of Fiji
YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO.,LTD./CTI ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD. JV
Final Report, Volume II Main Report, Part II: Feasibility Study
18-119
Table 18-50 Whole Construction Work Schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12
(day) (Month) 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 30 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 30 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 1 0 2 0 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 30 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 30 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 30 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 30 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 30 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 10 2 0 30 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 10 20 30 10 20 3 0 1 0 20 30 10 20 30 1 0 2 0 30 10 20 30
P1-1 Preparation 30 1.0Access Road 30 1.0
272 9.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Earth Work Excavation 357 11.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Embankment 378 12.6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
180 6.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
P1-2 Preparation 30 1.0 1 1 1Access Road 30 1.0 1 1 1
148 4.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Earth Work Excavation 245 8.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 245 8.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1180 6.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1P1-3 Preparation 30 1.0 1 1 1
Access Road 30 1.0 1 1 138 1.3
Earth Work Excavation 186 6.2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 441 14.7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Structures 180 6.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
42 1.4 1 1 1 1
Earth Work Excavation 58 1.9 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 148 4.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
270 9.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
Earth Work Excavation 6 0.2 1Embankment 63 2.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
90 3.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0
Earth Work Excavation 87 2.9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Embankment 91 3.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1270 9.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 1
Preparation 30 1.0
Access Road 30 1.0Earth Work Excavation 63 2.1 1 1 1
Embankment 80 2.7 1 1 1 1 1
180 6.0
Clearing 30 1.0 1 1 130 1.0
30 1.0
90 3.0
420 14.0
420 14.0
300 10.0
Removal T emporary Bridges 60 2.0
Clearing 30 1.0
30 1.0
30 1.0
90 3.0
420 14.0
420 14.0
480 16.0
Removal T emporary Bridges 60 2.0
Clearing 30 1.0
Pack
age
Section Main Work ItemConstruction
Periond1 year 2 year 3year 4year
Coffer dam (Installation & Removal)
Structures
Coffer dam (Installation & Removal)
Riv
er W
ork
P1 R
iver
Wid
enin
g
Coffer dam (Installation & Removal)
Structures
Structures
P4-2
Structures
Structures
P3 R
ing
Dik
e P3
Structures
P2 R
etar
ding
Bas
in P2
Coffer dam
P4 S
urro
undi
ng D
ike
&Sh
ortc
ut
P4-1
PreparationAccess Road, Detour
T emporary Bridge Works
Superstructure Extention
Brid
ge W
ork
Reb
uild
ing
of B
ridge
s
Nadi T own Bridge
Removal Existing Bridges
Substructure
Superstructure Extention
Old Queens RoadBridge
Preparation
Access Road, Detour
T emporary Bridge Works
Removal Existing Bridges
Substructure
Dry Season Dry SeasonDry Season Dry Season
Drainage Suluice Gate Overflow Dike
Fabrication of Flood Wall Gate Installation of Flood Wall Gate
Flap Gate for drainage
Flap Gate for drainage and small river
Flap Gate for drainage and small river
Rainy Season Rainy Season RainyRainy Season Rainy Season