Indonesia Ministry of Health Asian Development Bank · PDF fileIndonesia Ministry of Health...
Transcript of Indonesia Ministry of Health Asian Development Bank · PDF fileIndonesia Ministry of Health...
Indonesia
Ministry of Health
Asian Development Bank
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms
TA 3579-INO, August 2004 - August 2008
Final Report
December 2008
Contents
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO I
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Contents
1 Executive Summary....................................................................................................1 2 Activity Summary........................................................................................................3
2.1 Objectives .....................................................................................................3 2.2 Terms of Reference ......................................................................................3 2.3 Team Deployment and Activities ..................................................................4 2.4 Semester Reports .........................................................................................6 2.5 Inception Period ............................................................................................6 2.6 Activities undertaken to support the ToR ......................................................6
3 Logical Framework Review ......................................................................................17 3.1 Goal of TA-3579..........................................................................................17 3.2 Outputs of TA-3579.....................................................................................17 3.3 Issues and Uncertainties.............................................................................18
4 Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care .....................................................20 4.1 The Primary Health Care System in Indonesia...........................................20 4.2 Health Care Providers.................................................................................22 4.3 Family Planning and Reproductive Health..................................................23 4.4 Community Health Program development ..................................................24 4.5 Budgets and Funds flow .............................................................................24 4.6 Health Service Utilization ............................................................................26 4.7 Poverty as a Barrier to Health Service Utilisation .......................................30
4.7.1 General considerations .................................................................30 4.7.2 Utilisation of outpatient services....................................................31 4.7.3 Utilisation of in-patient services.....................................................33 4.7.4 Assisted birthing rates ...................................................................34 4.7.5 Contraceptive prevalence..............................................................35 4.7.6 Immunisation and other preventative health services ...................36
5 Lessons Learned and Recommendations ................................................................42 5.1 One Size Does Not Fit All ...........................................................................42 5.2 Free Health Services Do Not Insure High Utilization ..................................44 5.3 Attitude of Health Workers towards Consumers Has an Impact.................44 5.4 Quality of Services make a Difference........................................................45 5.5 New Financial Regulations Every year Cause Difficulties ..........................45 5.6 Community Ownership Determines Utilization............................................46
6 Conclusions ..............................................................................................................47 6.1 General Conclusions...................................................................................47 6.2 Impact on Decentralisation and Health Sector Reform...............................47
Contents
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO II
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
6.3 Impact on Millennium Development Goals .................................................48 6.4 Recommendations for Future TA................................................................49
7 Annexes....................................................................................................................50 7.1 TA-3579-INO Logical Framework ...............................................................50 7.2 Field Visits...................................................................................................54 7.3 Publications and Presentations...................................................................65
7.3.1 Technical Documents Produced ...................................................65 7.3.2 Meetings attended.........................................................................70
7.4 District level participation with Assisted Deliveries, 2004 ...........................80 7.5 Desa Siaga Guidelines ...............................................................................81
7.5.1 Summary .......................................................................................81 7.5.2 Model development of Desa Siaga ...............................................82 7.5.3 Elements and principles of the Desa Siaga Activity ......................83 7.5.4 Facilitators .....................................................................................85 7.5.5 Operational model in selected villages..........................................86 7.5.6 Impact Evaluation of Desa Siaga ..................................................94 7.5.7 Cost effectiveness .........................................................................97
7.6 Economic and Financial Analysis of Desa Siaga......................................101 7.6.1 Background and Objective of the Analysis..................................101 7.6.2 The Concept of Desa Siaga ........................................................101 7.6.3 Pos Kesehatan Desa (Village Health Post) and Desa Siaga ......102 7.6.4 Establishment and Operation of Desa Siaga ..............................103 7.6.5 Economic Analysis ......................................................................103 7.6.6 Sustainability ...............................................................................110 7.6.7 Cost Effectiveness.......................................................................111
7.7 DHS-2 District Level Health System Performance Data 2007 ..................112
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO IV
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Abbreviations and Acronyms
ADB Asian Development Bank
ANC Ante-natal Care
AusAID Australian Agency for International Development
BAPPEDA Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (Provincial Planning Agency)
BAPPENAS Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional National Development Planning Agency
BCC Behavior Change Communication
BEONC Basic Emergency Obstetric Neonatal Care (PONED)
BKKBN Badan Koordinasi Keluarga Berencana Nasional (National Family Planning Coordinating Board)
BUPATI Government officer in charge of a regency
CEONC Comprehensive Emergency Obstetric Neonatal Care (PONEK)
CPCU Central Project Coordinating Unit
DEKON Dana Dekonistrasi (Funds to support decentralization)
Desa Siaga “Aware Village” (Desa Siap Antar Jaga)
DHA District Health Account
DHC District Health Committee
DHO District Health Office
DHS 1 DHS 2
First Decentralized Health Services Project Second Decentralized Health Services Project
DIPA Daftar Isian Pelaksanaan Anggaran (New Annual Operational Budget format)
DIU District Implementation Unit
DPRD Province or District Parliament
DTPS District Team Problem Solving
FP Family Planning
GIS Geographical Information System
GOI Government of Indonesia
GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (German Agency for Technical Cooperation)
HIS Health Information System
HNSDP Health and Nutrition Sector Development Program
HSP Health Sector Program (USAID)
HSR Health Sector Reform
IBI Ikatan Bidan Indonesia (Indonesian Midwives Association)
IEE Initial Environmental Examination
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO V
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
IHPB Integrated Health Planning and Budgeting
IMCI Integrated Management of Childhood Infections
IT Information Technology
JBIC Japanese Bank for International Cooperation
JKJ Jaminan Kesehatan Jembrana (Jembrana Health Network)
JPS-BK Jaring Pengaman Sosial – Bidang Kesehatan (Social Safety Net Program for Health)
KAP Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices
KIA Kesehatan Ibu & Anak (Maternal and Child Health)
KPPN Kantor Pelayanan Perbendaharaan Negara (Government Treasury Office)
MDG Millennium Development Goals
MIS Management Information System
MMR Maternal Mortality Rate
MNCH Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health
MOF Ministry of Finance
MOH Ministry of Health
MOHA Ministry of Home Affairs
MOHSW Ministry of Health and Social Welfare
MTR Mid-Term Review
NGO Non-Governmental Organization
NTB Nusa Tenggara Barat (West Nusa Tenggara)
NTT Nusa Tenggara Timur (East Nusa Tenggara)
PAM Project Administratin Manual
PCIU Provincial Coordination Implementation Unit
PDK Pusat Desentralisasi Kesehatan Decentralization Unit
Pemda Pemerintah Daerah (local government)
PHP Provincial Health Project
PLKB Petugas Lapangan Keluarga Berencana Family Planning Field Worker
PMS Performance Monitoring System
Polindes Pondok Persalinan Desa (Village Birthing Post)
PPM Provincial Project Manager
Puskesmas Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat (Community Health Center)
Pustu Puskesmas Pembantu (Auxiliary Community Health Center)
QA Quality Assurance
QC Quality Control
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO VI
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
QI Quality Improvement
RRP Report and Recommendations to the President (ADB)
S1 Bachelor level degree
S2 Master level degree
S3 Doctoral level degree
SAF Special Allocation Fund
SIKDA Sistem Informasi Kesehatan Daerah District Health Information System
SKN Sistem Kesehatan Nasional (National Health System)
SPM Surat Perintah Membayar (Payment Order)
SPSDP Social Protection Sector Development Program
SSN Social Safety Network
SUSENAS Survei Sosio-Ekonomi Nasional National Socio-Economic Survey
SWIM Sector Wide Implementation Management
TA Technical Assistance
TRT Technical Review Team
UCI Universal Coverage of Immunization
UNDP United Nations Development Programme
UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund
USAID United States Agency for International Development
VCDC Village Community Development Cadres
WHO World Health Organization
Executive Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 1
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
1 Executive Summary
TA-3579-INO has successfully com-
pleted four years of Technical Assis-
tance to the Ministry of Health to sup-
port health sector reform.
TA-3579-INO telah berhasil menyelesaikan
empat tahun sebagai Technical Assistance
untuk Depkes dalam mendukung reformasi
sektor kesehatan.
The final report reviews the terms of
reference from the original request for
proposal, through loan negotiation,
and project inception, and then dis-
cusses the activities undertaken as
parts of the terms of reference.
Laporan akhir meninjau kerangka acuan dari
permintaan awal untuk proposal, melalui
negosiasi pinjaman, dan proyek
pendahuluan, dan kemudian mendiskusikan
kegiatan yang diambil sebagai bagian dari
kerangka acuan.
The team composition varied during
this project, and a discussion of the
team composition, and the responsi-
bilities of the various team members
are a prelude to the review of travel
during the TA.
Susunan tim berubah selama proyek ini, dan
suatu diskusi tentang susunan tim, dan
tanggung jawab dari berbagai anggota tim
adalah suatu pendahuluan bagi tinjauan
perjalanan selama TA.
Various issues in the execution the TA
are discussed, and the report con-
cludes with some suggestion for im-
proving the quality of technical assis-
tance during the final three years of
DHS-2.
Berbagai masalah dalam menjalankan TA
dibahas, dan laporan ditutup dengan
beberapa saran untuk meningkatkan mutu
technical assistance selama tiga tahun
terakhir bagi DHS-2.
The TA has documented many of the
health sector reforms initiate by the
project in various locations. We in-
cluded these case studies to docu-
ment some of the innovations under-
taken by the DHS-1 project.
TA telah mendukumentasikan banyak hal
mengenai reformasi kesehatan yang
diperlukan oleh proyek di berbagai lokasi
Kami memasukkan pembelajaran masalah
ini untuk mencatat beberapa inovasi yang
dilaksanakan oleh Proyek DHS-1
The primary objective of the DHS
loans was to improve health status of
mothers, and children by improving
access to basic primary health care
activities.
Tujuan utama dari pendanan DHS adalah
untuk meningkatkan status kesehatan ibu
dan anak dengan meningkatakan akses
pada kegiatan kesehatan dasar.
Executive Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 2
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
While the project was successful in
utilization of health care in some prov-
inces and districts, there are still many
barriers to health care and health
status with the project areas. We re-
view these barriers in order to help
future support for decentralization fo-
cus on issues that might help improve
health status and utilization of primary
health care services.
Meski proyek telah berhasil dalam
peningkatanan kesehatan di beberapa
provinsi dan kabupaten; masih banyak
kendala dalam masalah kesehatan dan
status kesehatan di daerah proyek. Kami
meninjau kendala-kendala ini untuk
kepentingan dukungan masalah
desentralisasi dimasa depan yang
diharapkan dapat meningkatakan status
kesehatan dan pelaksanaan pelayanan
kesehatan
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 3
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
2 Activity Summary
2.1 Objectives
The Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms Project (TA 3579-INO) team was authorized
on 19 July 2004 at negotiations in Manila to collaborate with the Decentralized Health Sys-
tem Project (DHS-1).
The objective and scope of contract for TA-3579-INO was to assist the Ministry of Health
(MOH) and selected local governments1 in identifying, implementing and evaluating appro-
priate health sector reforms in the context of decentralization. TA resources were to be used
to support reforms at the central level and in districts and the provinces. The TA focused on
DHS-1 and DHS-2 project areas and TA resources were several times used in non-project
areas on MOH’s request and ADB’s approval.
2.2 Terms of Reference
The Objectives and terms of reference for the TA in the contract2 are as follows:
The main thrust of the TA was to suspect health system development in three main areas;
1. Access
2. Quality and
3. Efficiency
The precise terms of reference were as follows:
i) Play an active role in local capacity building to improve planning management
skills and practices in the DHS provinces.
ii) Assist with the training of core set of trainers to help provinces and districts and
develop strategic and operation plans.
iii) Play a liaison/facilitation role with MOH counterparts at national, provincial and lo-
cal levels officials.
iv) Play a proactive role through advice to MOH and provinces on emerging health
needs, health planning policy issues.
1 The original project was to include all the districts of Aceh, Riau, Bengkulu, Bali, North Su-lawesi, Central Sulawesi, and Southeast Sulawesi. When the Islands of Riau because a separate province (previously part of Riau), it was included. Tsunami affected districts in Aceh were excluded form the project in 2007.
2 Terms of reference from “Request for Proposal” TA-3579-INO, ADB August 2002
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 4
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
v) Maintain and foster effective linkages with other donor projects in health and re-
lated sectors.
vi) The TA will assist the local project implementation units when possible.
During negotiations3 the terms of reference were modified and reformulated as:
1. Assessment,
2. Development of a plan of action,
3. Development and implementation of health sector reforms,
4. Development and implementation of provincial and district health sector develop-
ment programs,
5. Investment in human resources, and
6. Facilitation of Networking and Communications.
The major difference between the two sets of Terms of References are that those within the
RFP are more oriented toward a strategy of increasing capacity of local government in plan-
ning to support decentralization of health services, and the terms of reference from the nego-
tiations are more oriented toward being advocates for health sector reforms. The TA has
tried to take both into consideration in developing work plans supporting the loans.
The TA within the last four years, has helped the two Decentralized Health Service loans
integrate Health Sector reform into its program as well humans resource development poli-
cies, helped in the development and discussion of significant policy issues, has assisted with
strategic planning at all levels of the government based on assessment, health status, and
capacity of the community to support health sector reform, as well as help facilitate lessons
learned in one district to other districts and provinces. The TA also supported various ADB
supervision and special missions during this time period.
2.3 Team Deployment and Activities
Membership in the TA team remained essentially stable during this work period. However,
only the team leader (Robert Tilden) and one domestic consultant (Prof Nur Nasri Noor)
worked full time for the entire contract. Other members worked periodically, or for full time
for specified periods of time.
The original design was to have international field assistance in two provinces. This concept
had worked well in the CHIPS4 project that USAID had fielded in the 1980’s.
3 16-17 June 2004, Quality and Cost Based Selection. In attendance for ADB was Yang Dan, Yuki Shiroishi; for the consultant Robert Gaertner, and R. Nunez, and for the Government of Indonesia, Isti Ratnaningsih
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 5
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
However in this case the provincial level experts were not well utilised, so that the TA recen-
tralized and worked from the centre, where demand for technical assistance was high, and
travelled to the various provinces and districts as requested. This increased the efficacy of
the technical input to the projects, but also increased the travel. Moreover health sector re-
form needed to be implemented at all levels of the government, and coordination in a decen-
tralized system takes greater effort, and a more participatory approach.
Tale 1: TA Team Deployment
Team-leader MM Team-leader MM
1 David Kelaher (DK) 04 2 Robert Tilden (RT) 44
International Consultants Domestic Consultants
1 James Sonnemann (JS) 14 1 Noor Nasry Noor (NN) 47
2 Ascobat Gani (AG) 15 2 James Darmawan5 (JD) 18
3 Don Hindle (DH) 04 3 RM Widjajanto (RW) 14
Table 2 summarizes the travel undertaken to support the DHS loans, and the purpose of the
various types of missions. As can be seen over half the travel was for technical support to
planning which was one of the major concerns within the terms of reference.
Table 2: TA travel by year and type of mission
Inception Supervision fact finding Advocacy Planning Support ADB
missions Total visits
2004 27 0 0 0 0 27
2005 0 13 27 36 11 87
2006 0 18 36 89 8 151
2007 0 12 9 59 0 80
2008 0 8 6 1 8 23
TOTAL 27 51 78 185 27 368
Travel was undertaken by invitation of the Government (National, Province and District), to
attend a meeting, or to assist with proposal development or advocacy.
4 CHIPS, (USAID): Comprehensive Health Improvement Province Specific, 1984-1989 in three provinces, Aceh, West Sumatera, and NTT. Expatriate staff were stationed full time at the provincial level, for on-site training, and facilitation. This program was considered a ground breaking project in the support of decentralization, and local empowerment.
5 Salary and contract for this consultant was directly with ADB.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 6
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
2.4 Semester Reports
The activities of the TA are summarized in progress reports. All semester reports contain an
evaluation of the previous six months against plans, presentations and publications, field ac-
tivities, etc., and working plans for all team members for the following semester.
Report Reporting Period
Inception Report September 2004 December 2004
1st Progress Report October 2004 March 2005
2nd Progress Report April 2005 September 2005
3rd Progress Report October 2005 March 2006
4th Progress Report April 2006 September 2006
5th Progress Report October 2006 March 2007
6th Progress Report April 2007 September 2007
1st Extension Phase Report October 2007 December 2007
2nd Extension Phase Report January 2008 June 2008
3rd Extension Phase Report July 2008 August 2008
2.5 Inception Period
The initial inception report development and its review by the technical team lead to a
change in personnel of the TA, including the team leader. A modified team was mobilized in
December of 2004, and ADB project managers worked closely with the TA unit to help it de-
velop a sense of teamwork and encouraged the MOH to efficiently utilize the TA for program
support and policy development. There have been additional staff added, but the core team
has been supporting the project since December 2005. The inception report did develop a
logical framework for TA-3579-INO which is included as Appendix A. The Outputs and Ac-
tivities described in the logical framework will be discussed.
2.6 Activities undertaken to support the ToR
TA activities to full-fill the ToR have been many and varied. It has involved attendance and
presentations at meetings, capacity building of provincial and district staff, advocacy, data
analysis, writing and dissemination of information, but it has also required a great deal of
travel. Many of the districts participating in the DHS project are underdeveloped economi-
cally, and in terms in infrastructure. There are many isolated areas covered by the DHS pro-
jects, and travel was often difficult, and long.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 7
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
The activities the TA has been involved across the span of the Indonesian archipelago, and
has involved different themes at many venues. Rather than chronologically recreate the ac-
tivities of the TA, this report will organize them around the various terms of reference which
are the primary responsibility of the TA, and give short examples of how the TA supported
local, national and provincial health sector reform and decentralization.
1) Local capacity building to improve planning and management skills and prac-tices in the DHS provinces.
1-a) MNCH Grand Design: During an ADB Special Mission in April 2005, the DHS 1 loan
programme was offered the possibility of extension through the end of 2008 if it could be re-
focused on its original goals, particularly the reduction of maternal, infant, and under five’s
mortality. To help focusing DHO activities on sustainable cost effective interventions to re-
duce risk to mothers and children, the TA developed a “Grand Design” for MNCH, including
investments in supply of services, community demand for quality MNCH services, coopera-
tion between government agencies, and cooperation with private sector and NGO, develop-
ing the capacity of local health offices, and advocacy to local parliaments. After developing
this strategy, much consultation was held with the Maternal Health Directorate, and the tech-
nical review team. The effect of the development of the grand design, its structure, and so-
cialization are discussed in case study annex section 8.
1-b) Prioritization of districts by risks to maternal health: In the absence of recent and
specific data on maternal mortality, the TA suggested using the percentage of assisted deliv-
eries (by trained health personnel) as a legitimate proxy indicator of maternal mortality risk.
This data is available on an annual basis from the Central Bureau of Statistics, and moreover
can be linked to household expenditure and has a large enough sample to be statistically
representative at the district level. Moreover, the literature suggests that maternal mortality
is strongly (inversely) associated with assisted delivery. In discussions with the Project
Manager (Head of Planning), the TA was requested to review time series of material mortal-
ity based on assisted delivery and total number of births at district level. The results of this
analysis were used to focus MOH resource allocation to priority districts. The USAID HSP
project also used this information to select districts to assist with MNCH programs. A map
showing the distribution of district level assisted deliveries in 2004 is included as annex 8.4
1-c) Revised logical framework of DHS-2: The acceptance of results and recommenda-
tions of the Mid-term Review (MTR) within the MoH was not automatic, and required a series
of meetings and discussions, particularly within the Directorate General of Community Health
(DGCH). The MoH eventually accepted the results of the MTR. Discussion continued with
BAPPENAS, and the Ministry of Finance (MoF), and after six months the results of the MTR
were officially accepted by the MoF, and a loan amendment requested. The logical frame-
work for DHS-2 was based on the logical framework from DHS-1, but contained more goals
in health status improvement, and more objectives in health program performance. As a re-
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 8
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
sults of the mid term review of DHS-2, its logical framework was brought into line with the
mid-term review findings, this in terms was discussed on modified in various stakeholder fo-
rums, until a agreement was reached. The Ministry of finance submitted this to ADB as part
of the loan amendment in June 2008.
1-d) Desa Siaga Guidelines: During the MTR, component 1 of the new design for DHS-2
was to support the Desa Siaga Programme through the development and evaluation of
model Desa Siaga in all DHS-2 districts. Guidelines and strategies especially for disease
surveillance and project monitoring for the Desa Siaga Programme were drafted by the TA,
and reviewed and revised by the TRT, the community health section of the MoH, and the
steering committee. The Desa Siaga guidelines are included as annex 8.5.
1-e) Analysis and evaluation of district performance: Working with two loans widely
spread throughout the Indonesian archipelago gave an opportunity to explore the perform-
ance of the various provinces and districts with regard to outpatient, in-patient, and immuni-
zation services. The Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics routinely collects information on
participation in public health programs from a sample of individuals and households that can
be analyzed down to the district level (SUSENAS). Through the analysis of the SUSENAS
data, access barriers were identified, and pro-active intervention was made to improve the
capacity of the district to meet the health challenges. This was initially undertaken for the
DHS-1 districts but also eventually included all DHS-2 projects, and was using 2000 as a
benchmark year, and comparing 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007. This health system perform-
ance data for DHS-2 districts from the 2007 SUSENAS data set is included as Annex 7.6
2) Training of a core set of trainers to help provinces and districts developing stra-tegic and operational plans.
2-a) Planning for greater focus in DHS-1: Participatory planning by district health offices
for the remaining final two years of DHS-1 was completed in a timely fashion during 2005
2006. These plans were reviewed by the TRT and the TA and suggestions were made for
strengthening and improvements. Then the plans were resubmitted and evaluated. Be-
cause of the TA support, DHS-1 was the first of the multi- or bilateral projects to focus on
MNCH when the Minister of Health requested that all loans focus on supporting the reduction
of maternal mortality. However it should be noted that promotion of maternal health was al-
ways central to the objectives of DHS-1.
2-b) Utilization of DEKON Funds for MNCH improvement: One of the unexpected out-
growths that reflects the synergy between team members was the translation of the concept
of district team problem solving (DTPS) into an operational reality, with districts meeting at
provinces to develop strong proposals for the DEKON grants from the national MOH. With
assistance from TA staff, members of the MOH Maternal Health Unit worked with all districts
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 9
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
in several provinces to develop district level proposals for use of the general funds made
available by the national government in DHS-1 areas.
2-c) Integrated Health Planning and Budgeting: Supporting integrated health planning
and budgeting is a specific ToR for the TA. Almost all districts in DHS-1 have participated in
various training exercises concerning integrated planning and budgeting. In addition, many
of the staff of the bureau of planning, and the Secretary General’s office have also partici-
pated in this exercise, which includes the review of nine different manuals. The impact of
this training is reviewed as a case study in the book annex, section 12.
2-d) Development and review of DHS-2 strategic plans: Participation of the TA in the
DHS-2 planning process was different from the assistance provided to the DHS-1 loan pro-
gramme during its refocusing exercise. The planning process for DHS-2 was carried out by
the Decentralization Unit of the MOH which was also the office of the DHS-2 Project Man-
ager, and also under the office of the Executive Director of DHS-2, the special advisor to the
Minister for Decentralization. The TA was involved in the technical review of the proposed
strategic plans developed by the various districts in the project. However, at the same time
the TA was involved in technical planning meetings as resource people in various DHS-2
districts around the country.
2-e) Field Visits to DHS districts: Many of the DHS-1 districts requested visits during the
socialization of the new MNCH orientation, and the TA responded at the request of the ex-
ecutive secretary. Based on the TA’s evaluation of health services data, many of the districts
in DHS-2 were visited to help strengthening the plans developed, and to help in local advo-
cacy to address structural issues and manpower needs. These visits also allowed for some
assessments into the various barriers to care seen through out the DHS-1 and DHS-2 areas,
and helped identify health sector reforms initiated by local governments. The field visits and
dates which they occurred are listed in annex 8.2.
2-f) Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) estimation and evaluation: As the Indonesian
government experiments with various approaches to develop valid vital registration systems,
the issue of MMR remains illusive. The international community tends to use rather higher
estimates (300-400 deaths per 100,000 live-births), than local health records collected na-
tionally estimate (130). The Central Bureau of Statistics estimates that in 2007, the MMR
was around 246. The MoH Community Health Division has developed a birth and maternal
death registration system, which estimates the maternal mortality ratio to be 130. Mean
while the demographic health survey of 2007 suggest it is still above 300. As reduction of
maternal mortality is one of the key elements of the logical framework, the TA has been very
involved in various research forums reviewing maternal mortality, and has developed several
methodologies for developing district level elements from data collected on assisted birthing.
One methodology developed by the TA is be investigated and enhanced by the University of
Indonesia, School of Public Health, with financial support from AusAID.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 10
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
2-g) Guidelines for using data in planning and decision making: One of the compo-
nents of the MTR for DHS-2 was developing a training program for district health officers to
work with local staff from the statistics bureau along with district BAPPEDA in analyzing
health status, and health utilization data. This activity is proposed for 2009-2010 in DHS-2.
The description of this activity can be found in the second extension progress report.
2-h) Guidelines for District Health Accounts: In the socialization for the new post MTR
DHS-2 management structure, districts were given time to discuss some of the various activi-
ties within the new structure they preferred. Over 30 districts said they wanted to develop
District Health Accounts, and by December of 2008, an instrument developed with support
by AusAid will be available to collect cost data from the private and public sector and the
consumers. This will help BAPPENAS and the MoH better understand health expenditure
patterns at the district level, and improve the national health accounts. This document is
found in the second extension progress report.
2-i) Guidelines for Desa Siaga Impact Evaluation: There is a need to demonstrate the
impact of the Desa Siaga program on the health status and community capacity for manag-
ing illness within communities. To date, the evaluation of various Desa Siaga initiatives have
been few in number and limited in scope. Brining researchers from local universities in-
volved in the evaluation of Desa Siaga, with technical support from larger Indonesian schools
of public health, offers the opportunity to identify attributes of successful programs, and those
that limit the impact, and thus will improve the quality of the program over time, as well as
decision making, that will be based on evidence for the cost-effectiveness of this approach.
This document can be found in the second extension progress report.
2-j) Operational research priorities in the area of nutrition: Many of the districts with
the highest levels of malnutrition are in the DHS-2 project area. While nutrition was an indi-
cator in the initial logical framework for DHS-2, it has not been included in the post MTR logi-
cal framework except for malnutrition in mothers as a component of Desa Siaga. The TA
helped developing some suggestions for operations research for districts with high rates of
malnutrition and has worked on nutritional issues related to growth faltering, and breast feed-
ing. This document can be found in the second extension progress report.
3) Liaison with MOH counterparts at national, provincial and local levels
3-a) Short “Project Preparation Technical Assistance” (PPTA) for DHS-1 refocus: As
a part of the loan extension process and approval from the ADB board for this extension and
focus, the TA was requested to go through a short PPTA, and revise the “Report and Rec-
ommendations to the President” (RRP) for DHS-1 to highlight the focus on MNCH. This was
done, commented by ADB staff, revised by DHS-1 management, however ADB made no
official change to the scope of the DHS-1 project.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 11
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
3-b) BKKBN data analysis: BKKBN has on a number of occasions asked support from
the TA. Data analysis on the SUSENAS data on district and provincial contraceptive preva-
lence rates was undertaken. This includes time series analysis, and poverty level analysis.
BKKBN has been very successful in achieving equality in access for contraceptives across
all levels of household expenditure. Susenas data gives lower estimation of contraceptive
prevalence rates, and does not have information on “un-met” family planning needs, that the
demographic health survey has, and so it is not officially recognized as the “preferred” data
source on contraceptive prevalence usage. However it is valid down to the district level, and
many low performance areas for contraceptive usage have been identified.
3-c) BKKBN annual planning meetings: Using data analysis undertaken for BKKBN, the
TA supported the 2006 and 20008 annual planning meetings for BKKBN at the national, pro-
vincial, and district level. In addition, the TA has worked with the executive secretary of
BKKBN DHS-2 to help develop a proposal on demand creation, and help in the formulation
and evaluation of annual plans. However, the Demographic Health Survey (DHS) remains
the official data source on contraceptive prevalence rates.
3-d) District level advocacy with focus on MDGs: The information generated by the
time series analysis of SUSENAS data was used as national and district level attainment
material for advocacy of MDGs at various district and provincial meetings to which the TA
was invited to participate. These meetings included governors, bupatis, and heads of BAP-
PEDA at the provincial level, and district health staff, various NGO’s, private health care pro-
viders, and intersecting social programs at district level.
3-e) Evaluation of DHS-2 management structure: By late 2007, DHS-2 had been red-
flagged by MoF, BAPPENAS, and the MoH as being “at risk” because of management is-
sues. DHS-2 management units, including the steering committee, the TRT, the project
manager, reviewed various issues with the TA, and discussed potential corrective actions.
3-f) DHS-2 Mid-Term Review (MTR): The TA was an active participant in the MTR, in
terms of assisting with meetings, provision of district level data, in field visits, in inception and
wrap up meetings, and review and revision of the MTR document.
3-g) Review of project priorities and plans: Directorates within the DG of Community
Health (where DHS-2 now resides) submitted requests to DHS-2 to support their programs
where there are over-laps between DHS-2 and program activities. The TA worked with the
TRT to help develop networks with the directorates and prioritizing requests for support.
3-h) DHS-2 involvement with the community health program: Prior to 2008, the linkage
between DHS-2 and the directorates within community health was limited. The TA has facili-
tated communication between the project management and the directorates by working with
the members of the TRT, coming from the various units of the directorate general, and get-
ting them involved in reviewing and discussing policy options for DHS-2.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 12
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
3-i) Plans for DHS-2 for 2009-2010. With the new post MTR DHS-2 structure, the issue
of centralization of funds flow changed both the nature of the strategic planning and the ac-
tivities that would be undertaken. The TA reviewed capital absorption in 2006 and 2007 at
the district and provincial level, and how the districts were utilizing the funds. The TA worked
with the CPCU and the districts at the national planning meetings and helped developing the
plans for 2009 - 2010 which were included as a part of the loan amendment.
4) Emerging health needs and health policy issues
4-a) Response to the Aceh Tsunami: The first month of the TA after the inception period
was dominated by the Aceh Tsunami and sorting through a possible role for the DHS-1 loan
of which Aceh is one of the participating provinces. Eventually a proposal for reconstruction
of health centres and a draft MOU was developed; the responsibility for reconstruction for
health centres was given to IOM of the United Nations system.
4-b) MNCH Component Strengthening: Even though MNCH was not part of its initial
ToR, MOH and ADB requested the TA to modify the team composition in order to have
stronger MNCH capacity. A specialist in Gynaecology & Obstetrics was added to the team,
with the mandate of developing guidelines on strengthening MNCH services in remote areas.
Team members and DHS-1 and 2 staff accompanied him on various trips to remote areas,
resulting in a great deal of cross fertilization, and a very useful guideline report. His report on
strategies to improve the maternal health services in remote and isolated areas is included in
the book annex as section 11.
4-c) Targeting the project to the poor and underserved: Systematically, the TA ad-
dressed issues of social responsibility, good governance, gender, and the pro-poor orienta-
tion suggested by the RRP. An “equity index” was developed to demonstrate the differences
in health service utilization between the top and bottom quintile of household expenditure.
Gender specific analysis was undertaken where appropriate.
4-d) Minimum Services Standards: While not a direct item of the ToR, Minimum Service
Standards became a subject of discussion. The ES of DHS-2 requested that members of
the TA participate in the discussion and review of Minimum Services Standards that he was
responsible to develop and submit to the Ministry of Home Affairs. The standards developed
by MOH had 64 programs included. The proposal developed by the special advisor to the
Minister on decentralization had 14 items, and was later reduced to 9. The finalization of the
Minimum Services Standards is now in the hands of the Ministry of Home Affairs.
4-f) Guidelines for Health Sector Reform and Operational Research: The executive
secretary of DHS-1 requested that the TA develop a series of guidelines, in Indonesian,
which it will publish it as a part of the intellectual legacy of the DHS project. These include:
a. Guidelines for Health Sector Reform;
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 13
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
b. Guidelines for operational research, and
c. Guidelines for strengthening MNCH in remote and isolated areas.
4-g) Case Studies on Health Sector Reform and Decentralization: The TA identified
various case studies and did in depth studies on districts and specific themes, including:
a) Introduction to the Indonesian Community Health System.
b) Changes in Utilization of Indonesian Health Care System 2000 to 2007
c) JKJ Insurance Scheme in Jembrana District: Does it promote Equity?
d) Improving Utilization of Outpatient Services by improving Quality of Care
e) The Tabanan Initiative: A Case Study of Decentralization improving the Quality
and Utilization of a District Hospital in Bali.
f) Managing Insurance Funds in the Puskesmas: A Case Study in Bali.
g) Community Based Health Services
h) Partnership between Traditional Birth Attendants and Midwives in Siak District,
Riau Province
i) Sharpening the Focus of the DHS-1 Project on Decentralized MNCH Services
j) Private Public Partnerships in North Sulawesi
k) Operational Research supporting Health Sector Reform and Decentralization
l) The “Cluster-Islands” Approach for Archipelago Areas to reduce Maternal Death
m) Integrated Health Planning at District Level: It’s impact on Health Sector Planning
4-h) Policy Dialogue: Issue papers related to surveillance, community empowerment,
improving quality of medical services, and health care financing were developed and dis-
cussed with senior health managers, on different occasions between 2006- 2008. In addition
a great deal of policy dialogue also went into the development of the post MTR logical
framework for DHS-2 that accompanied the loan amendment.
4-i) Initial Costing and Review of Desa Siaga: The TA, in response to a request from
the ADB supervision mission of June 2007, undertook a costing exercise for the proposed
Desa Siaga initiative, and analyzed several approaches to mobilize this program. This is
included as annex 8.7
4-j) Collection and Analysis of RisKesDes Data: The TA has been involved in the de-
velopment of variables and the collection of data for the new baseline survey undertaken by
the MoH research section. This data set includes information on nutritional status, infectious
and chronic diseases, accidents, quality of life, dental and visual health, blood chemistry,
health care utilization, participation in public health programs, and household health expendi-
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 14
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
tures. The data set covers all the districts of Indonesia and will be Officially launched on De-
cember 1, 2008. This data will allow for districts to begin to explore various aspects of their
health system performance over time.
5) Linkages with other Projects and Programs in Health and related Sectors
5-a) Interaction with various bi- and multi-lateral donors: This was not a primary re-
sponsibility of the TA, as communication with bi- and multi-lateral agencies is channelled
through the Indonesian Resident Mission. However the TA has interacted directly with do-
nors when approached, and at the request of the government.
5-b) AusAid: They worked closely with the TA to review progress after the inception pe-
riod. During this time, the AusAid health representative met monthly with the TA and the Ex-
ecutive Director of DHS-1 to review issues, and plans for activities. During the development
of the AusAid long term programme, one TA member was seconded for a month to work with
the team and help in the development of a Health Service Strengthening project. The TA
has also worked closely with the national AusAid health consultant on the identification of
policy initiatives, and review of program performance.
5-c) USAID: The TA has collaborated with the USAID Health Sector Project, both in terms
of policy dialogue, as well as training for advocators for MNCH in West Java, and developed
a series of structured data analysis to help identify areas of high risk considering MMR and
the absolute number of maternal deaths. Socialization of the MNCH Grand Design was held
early on in the HSP project. Recently the TA has been working with USAID in supporting the
GAVI-HSS proposal development.
5-d) GTZ: GTZ has one of the strongest bilateral presences within the MoH, but also focus
on two provinces which are part of DHS-2. Various meetings have been attended to coordi-
nate activities. GTZ supported the development of annual and strategic plans for NTB and
NTT provinces, and was involved in the review of these plans.
5-e) World Bank: The World Bank also has several decentralized health loans, and the
TA shared lessons learned, and discussed various issues arising with the support and im-
plementation of decentralized health sector reform with the health advisor. Now, the Bank is
taking a new direction focusing on policy development, and specific technical issues.
5-f) UNICEF: UNICEF is very active in the eastern part of Indonesia, and Sulawesi. The
TA has worked with UNICEF both at the national level, and in the province of West Sulawesi.
The TA has given several presentations at UNICEF meetings.
5-g) Global Alliance Vaccine Imitative: GAVI has been developing a proposal for a grant
on strengthening health service delivery systems. They have used some of the work of the
TA in the conceptual framework, and have asked the TA to participate in review meetings.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 15
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
5-h) Quintile Analysis: The TA developed in 2005 an analysis of the frequency of assisted
birthing in relation to household expenditure quintiles, which was immediately picked up by
other bilateral and multilateral agencies. In 2006 this analysis was expanded to include utili-
zation of out-, and inpatient services, measles immunization, contraceptive prevalence rates
in fertile married women, as well as the nutritional status of preschool children. In 2007, an
equity index was developed, which looked at the difference in health service utilization be-
tween the top and bottom quintile of income. In 2008, most social policy analysis undertaken
reviewed differences between levels of household expenditures.
5-i) NGO workshop: The TA organized a workshop, to inform NGO’s of the project’s pur-
pose and structure, and to identify areas for collaboration, and requested the NGO’s to re-
view ways in which they might contribute and support DHS-2, particularly the Desa Siaga
component. This activity is described in more detail in the second extension report.
5-j) Sector Wide Management (SWiM) in NTB: The TA reviewed the organization of the
many donors working in NTB and has made some observations on how the inputs from the
various agencies can be better coordinated.
6) Local Project Implementation Units
6-a) Grand Design on MNCH: Socialisation to district governments and the development
of specific plans was done in series of meetings organized to train and standardize the ap-
proach and to develop consensus among provincial and district level staff. This was followed
by provincial meetings attended by district health officers to discuss the utilization of project
resources to strengthen MNCH programs (through investments from the DHS-1 loan).
6-b) SUSENAS Data Analysis: In anticipation of the project completion report, the TA has
been involved in reviewing program impact in terms of utilization of outpatient and inpatient
services, trends in contraceptive prevalence, assisted delivery, and measles vaccination
coverage in districts supported by various programs.
6-c) Health Sector Reform Bulletin: DHS-1 published a semi-annual bulletin, which con-
tains short articles on various project components, health sector reform research, and since
2005 all issues contained one or more articles provided by various TA members.
6-d) ADB missions: The TA supported and accompanied all ADB missions related to the
DHS loans since its inception. This has helped make the TA more effective and efficient.
6-e) Socialization of Technical Review Team (TRT) of DHS-2: The former DHS-2 man-
agement did not utilize TA for the directorates working in community health, and for the first
two years, no meeting was called for the TRT. Only after BAPPENAS combined TRT func-
tions of DHS 1 and 2, some technical involvement of the community health program was
achieved. In 12/2007, DHS-1 had a meeting for the TRT and MOF, in which the TA re-
viewed both loans and presented approaches to improve loan impact.
Activity Summary
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 16
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
6-f) Development of training plans: The TA worked with the DHS-2 secretariat on de-
veloping training plans for degree and non-degree training. The degree fellowships included
both domestic and international degree training, and the non-degree included both flagship,
and on the job training. These plans have been amended by several sections of BAP-
PENAS, and revised according to their suggestions.
6-g) Cost tables for reformulated DHS-2 project: New plans have been developed by all
DHS-2 provinces using the post MTR logical frame work; all budgets have been compiled,
and new cost tables were developed for submission with the DHS-2 loan amendment.
6-h) Training of facilitators for DHS-2 Desa Siaga component: The TA was involved in
the development of a module for training facilitators for the post Desa Siaga component.
The facilitators will work with village health committee’s and local mid-wives to develop vil-
lage action plans for the implementation of the “Desa Siaga” block grants.
6-i) Development of ToR for meetings, contracts, and study tours: At the request of
the project’s executive secretary, manager, and director, and the head of the steering com-
mittee, the TA has facilitated the drafting of terms of reference for activities, meetings, con-
tracts, research, and study tours.
6-j) New DHS-2 management structure post MTR. The TA reviewed and participated in
the development of the new management structure for DHS-2, as the loan management from
DHS-1 and DHS-2 was streamlined and integrated.
6-K) Socialization of the new DHS-2 management structure: The TA worked with the
new management for DHS-2 in socializing the revised logical framework to DHS-2 provinces
and districts. It helped provinces and districts in adapting their strategic plans, and how best
to implement them considering the new management structure and funds flow environment.
6-l) Implementation of the MTR: Because of the involvement of the TA in the mid term
review, it was in a good position to help reviewing the new management structure within
MoH. After the MTR report was finalized, the TA worked under the guidance of the execu-
tive secretary on setting up a number of steps that would get the BAPPENAS and the Minis-
try of Finance to agree to the changes suggested in the Mid-term review.
Logical Framework Review
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 17
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
3 Logical Framework Review
The Logical Framework for the TA remained unchanged for the duration of the project, the
logical framework for DHS-1 was modified as a result of the gap analysis and refocusing of
DHS-1 and submitted to ADB, but no formal modification of the logical framework was under-
taken. DHS-2 went through a substantial modification after the Mid-Term review when the
Ministry of Finance requested a loan amendment.
3.1 Goal of TA-3579
The Goals of TA3579 are essentially the goals of DHS-1 and DHS-2 which in turn are similar
except that DHS-2 also has the goal of reducing malnutrition. Specifically the health dimen-
sion goals of DHS-1&2 are on the following health parameters, their targets and impact are
however different:
i) Reduce the maternal mortality ratio to below 200 (DHS-1) / 175 (DHS -2).
ii) Reduce infant mortality to 30 (DHS-1) / 25 (DHS-2)
iii) Reduce under five year mortality rate to 40 (DHS-1) / 25-(DHS-2).
iv) Life expectancy at birth - 2 year increase (DHS-1&2)
v) Reduce Underweight children from 34% to 22% (DHS 2)
It appears that DHS-1 is well positioned to meet the goals for maternal mortality and infant
mortality for the project area by the years 2010 (as specified in its logical frame work), al-
though several provinces still remain low in terms of health status attainment (Central and
South East Sulawesi).
The 2007 Demographic Health Survey gives cause for concern with regard to the under five
(U5) mortality goal. The survey suggests that the rate has not improved since 2002 and in
two of the DHS provinces with low level of U5 mortality in 2002 (Bali and North Sulawesi) the
U5 mortality rates have actually increased. Only two districts made the goal of the logical
framework on U5 mortality, those being Riau and SE Sulawesi.
DHS-2 does not appear to be in a position to meet any of their goals for the project area with
the exception of South Sumatra. Two the project districts have some of the highest rates of
malnutrition in Indonesia, as well as the highest infant mortality and maternal mortality.
3.2 Outputs of TA-3579
The outputs for the TA within the log frame are six:
1) Health sector reform (HSR) supported at decentralized levels.
2) Human Capacity for health systems management and delivery strengthened.
Logical Framework Review
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 18
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
3) Health Plans based on actual costs developed.
4) Decision maker understanding of public health priorities improved.
5) Operations research capacity strengthened.
6) Project management improved.
The TA has made contribution to all six areas outlined as outputs of the TA within the log
frame. The TA team has worked on all health sector reform areas with particular focus on
the improvement of capacities for health systems management and service delivery. Health
plans have been reviewed for cost estimates, operations research proposals have been ana-
lysed, and the TA has assisted in all aspects of project management.
3.3 Issues and Uncertainties
While DHS-1 was implemented slowly, it showed steady improvement during the years of the
TA. However DHS-2 was plagued by late release of funds and management shifts during
the period the TA was in existence. After continued years of low loan performance in terms
of budgetary achievement, and there is some question as to its continued existence, particu-
larly after 2008, which will also be a year of low budgetary achievement. While DHS-2 was
able to modify its scope, the late release of funds in 2008 will make this year a lower level of
capital absorption than previous years.
Within the TA, work has been shared, and communication between the team members has
been excellent. All members of the TA showed a high level of professional commitment in
their support provided to local, provincial and national governments. Travel schedules were
often extreme as many of the areas of the project are isolated. Moreover the environment
within the TA was frank and all members of the TA would critical review various comments
before collectively making a decision. Thus, the TA was able to provide support to health
sector reform, not only in the DHS1&DHS-2 areas, but in the country in general.
The function of the IRM in managing contacts with various donors was intermittent, so that
collaboration with agencies often depended on in-formal contacts, and government forums.
Often other donors would anticipate support from the project, however the funds within the
DHS loans belong to the local government, and while suggestions can be made, the final
decision, in what to invest, belongs to provincial and district governments. Donors would
often put themselves in a position to influence fund allocation, particularly in those provinces
where they had a mandate from BAPPENAS to focus their assistance to specific districts.
The problems encountered during the inception, partly due to a too general design of the TA
unit, were solved in coordination with the government. The various ADB task managers
have worked diligently to fill the gaps left by the original TOR, by assigning additional terms
of reference to the TA, particularly for the three contract extensions.
Logical Framework Review
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 19
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
The utilization of the TA by the government has been high, both the planning unit and vari-
ous directorates within the Secretary General’s office and the DG of Community Health have
made various requests to the TA in line with DHS-1 refocus on MNCH, and to support policy
development and implementation. DHS-2 structural and financing issues have caused a
great deal of confusion, not only between the MOH and District Health Offices within the pro-
ject, but also between various Ministries in Jakarta. This particularly has been a problem in
the time since the post MTR reorganization of DHS-2.
Late release of government funds has affected not only program performance in DHS-1 and
DHS-2, but also the TA’s ability to interact with provincial and district governments. In 2008
the government development budget is programmed to be released in December and con-
tracting takes 1-2 months, so that no achievement is expected in DHS-2 this year. This fun-
damental uncertainty influences the operations of all projects within the government. This
will continue to be a problem for DHS-2 into the fiscal year 2009, which is an election year.
One of the major unresolved issues is the inclusion of nutrition in the DHS-2 log frame as an
indicator of program performance, while it remains absent in national plans. Though some
districts have identified nutrition as an issue, it is rather addressed by capacity building than
through the development of new approaches, or making existing programs more effective.
Continuation of DHS-2 after 2008 remains a question due to its low performance. However,
if it is continued, strong managerial support, along with assistance from and cooperation with
the Ministry of Finance will be required to reach a higher level of capital absorption. DHS-2
does stand to make rapid progress in the next years if these structural issues are resolved.
In addition, specific technical input continues to be required for DHS-2. The national initiative
of the Desa Siaga block grant will require continuous support though 2009 in order to ensure
that the facilitators work with villagers to develop village action plans and that these plans are
implemented efficiently. Moreover, technical input is required on the impact evaluation of
Desa Siaga, and on establishing the surveillance and monitoring functions within the Desa
Siaga initiative. Given the low utilization of consultants by the government, it should be an-
ticipated that arrangements to cover the cost of this unit be covered by ADB.
Desa Siaga is one of the post MTR DHS-2 initiatives, but component five which focuses on
using data for decision making is also an area where additional technical resources are
needed. In particular, with the number of districts and provinces working on improving In-
formation Technology at the service delivery level, national technical assistance should be
available to help support and standardize various approaches, as well as assist in the cross
fertilization to districts that have not identified this as a crucial issue. However there is a lack
time between the training of facilitators and the formation of village action communities and
the development of plans. There are considerable capital costs involved with this program
as can be seen in annex 8.7 “Cost analysis of Deas Siaga”.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 20
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
4 Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
4.1 The Primary Health Care System in Indonesia
The DHS loans while designed to promote health sector reform and decentralization, and all
the districts under DHS or other projects work within the larger framework of the Indonesian
Public Health System. The Government of Indonesia has historically considered health and
primary health care as a human right. The public health care, and especially the outpatient
system, has achieved good coverage throughout the country. However it is not performing
at its optimal level because of inadequate financial support.
Hospital based care is located in every district but has low rates of utilization, and it is as-
sumed that the poorer the family, the less likely they are to utilize these health care services.
While every district has a hospital, many of these hospitals do not offer the complete set of
specialist services, and often have insufficient equipment.
Training for nurses, midwives, and other public health staff is done by both the government
and by private schools. The quality of this training is often limited because of lack of training
materials, equipment and libraries.
Despite universal access to outpatient medical services, people, when they are sick, usually
treat themselves, and are often more inclined to visit health care providers during their pri-
vate practice time, than visiting the same provider at the public clinic, where the cost for ser-
vices are reduced or non-existent.
The developers of the Indonesian Health Care System were trained in cost effectiveness,
and the development and expansion of the system was based on the evaluation of program
impact and efficiency. This approach has helped the health care system develop low cost
activities with high levels of coverage and Indonesia has reached a threshold of life expec-
tancy on a very low level of resource input from Government and consumers. The money
spent on health care in Indonesia is 1/8 of the amount spent in the Philippines, yet they have
almost equivalent life expectancies.
Country
Health Expdenditure
US$ 2002 %GDP
Government Health Ex-pend. Per capita US
% of Total Govern
expend on health
Life Ex-pect at birth
Indonesia 20 2.8% 5 3.5% 68
Malaysia 294 3.3% 156 6.1% 72
Myanmar 28 2.2% 4 1.2% 59
Philippines 169 3.4% 80 7.0% 69
Singapore 993 3.6% 329 6.7% 80
Thailand 237 3.6% 138 11.8% 70
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 21
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Country
Health Expdenditure
US$ 2002 %GDP
Government Health Ex-pend. Per capita US
% of Total Govern
expend on health
Life Ex-pect at birth
Canada 2,541 9.9% 1,452 15.2% 80
France 2,416 9.3% 2,061 13.4% 80
Japan 2,827 7.6% 2,298 16.1% 82
United Kingdom 1,859 7.3% 1,442 14.6% 78
United States 4,539 13.1% 2,017 18.2% 77
The public health and medical system was developed during a period of time that all admin-
istrative and management functions were centralized. So the health system is rather stan-
dardized across the country. But since 2001 the government has decentralized, and control
of the provincial health system is the responsibility of the governor, and the health system at
the district and sub district level is the domain of the district government. Most of the districts
and cities of Indonesia, however, have not yet fully utilized the opportunity that decentraliza-
tion has brought them, to make their health system appropriate to the demands of local con-
sumer expectations, and develop health care as part of their regional economies.
According to law, money to support community health activities is the responsibility of the
district government, but in reality almost 70% of the government health budget is still allo-
cated through the national government. And the government health budget is only about
35% of the total health expenditure budget in Indonesia.
Several other units of the Government work with the Ministry of Health in the delivery of
health services to the poor, this would include the National Development Planning Agency
(Bappenas), the family planning board (BKKBN), Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of Fi-
nance, the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Food and Drugs, and the Ministry of Educa-
tion. But within this network of Government support to community health, the Ministry of
Health plays a cutting edge role.
The Alma Ata Declaration on Primary Health Care for All occurred in 1978, at the same
time that the Government of Indonesia was attempting to develop a nation wide primary
health care and public health system. The key to this program was a community health care
centre (Puskesmas), which was staffed with a physician, but also contained public health
nurses, midwives, sanitarians, infectious disease control staff, and nutritionists. The WHO
motto of health for all by the year 2000 became one of the cornerstones of the Indonesian
public health program. The core 14 elements of primary health care as laid out by the Alma
Ata declaration became the basic elements of health care development in Indonesia.
On the forefront of this primary health care revolution was the Posyandu, where mothers
bring their children once a month for growth monitoring, nutritional first aid, immunization,
basic treatment, and access to basic maternal health. The Posyandu was adopted as a na-
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 22
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
tional program in 1982, and covers all villages in Indonesia with basic health services. In
areas where community ownership was developed, Posyandu has been a strong promoter of
good community health, and community “self-help”.
4.2 Health Care Providers
Physicians are not the only medical care providers in Indonesia. Reproductive health is the
domain of midwives (many with only one year of training past high school). And even though
many physicians work for the health system, they will still have private practices that they run
in the afternoon and evening. Midwives, while recruited and trained by the government, also
run a semi-private practice, and while they get money from local government for assisting
with delivery of poor mothers, they provide care to better off community members on a fee
for service basis. Many nurses also hold afternoon private practice. Although service during
private practice hours might be 3 to 4 times more expensive than registration fee’s during the
hours of public practice hours, almost half of the outpatient care in Indonesia is given within
the “private” setting. Although better off families tend to utilize private services more than
poorer families, the utilization of public outpatient care services remain constant across in-
come, with the higher income families making more visits to private providers.
Figure 1:
The role of traditional health care gives has decreased dramatically over the last 20 years as
educational levels have increased, although in rural areas Traditional Birth Attendants do
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 23
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
about 40% of the delivers because of limited availability of qualified midwives. So while the
use of traditional medicine and “magical” cures are still occurring traditional medicine is no
longer as prevalent as it was after independence. More often this approach is used with
chronic diseases that do not respond to traditional therapy. Herbal therapy and the con-
sumption of herbals teas called “Jamu”, to treat disease and promote health is also wide
spread. In addition for some conditions, massage is considered the appropriate therapy.
4.3 Family Planning and Reproductive Health
During the 50’s and early 60’s Indonesia had a pro-population growth policy, but during the
early 70’s the multilateral and bilateral health development policy was dominated by a wide-
spread concern about population growth. Keeping the world’s population within reasonable
bounds became a major priority for bilateral and multi-lateral agencies.
After the establishment of the “new order” in the late 1960’s, the policy of the government
changed, and unlimited population growth was viewed as a threat to “development”, which
was the major priority of the new government.
The development of a national population planning board independent of the Ministry of
Health, was supported by a number of multilateral and bilateral development assistance poli-
cies, and in Indonesia, the National Family Planning Board (BKKBN) was established.
USAID and the United Nations Family Planning Agency invested heavily in BKKBN’s devel-
opment, its procurement of contraceptives, and for its research and development activities.
The R&D initiative of family planning helped develop the posyandu program as well the mid-
wife in the village (BDD) strategy.
The family planning movement in Indonesia became one of the world’s success stories in
family planning with significant coverage of the poor with contraception, and significant re-
duction in overall fertility and population growth in Indonesia. Their success was based on
their ability to make communities feel they owned the program, of keeping families small and
prosperous. However during the decentralization period, the family planning unit maintained
a belief in a vertical program delivery, remained centralized, and lost its operation units at the
District level. Contraceptive prevalence rate though have continued high with Susenas re-
porting over 54% of married women between the age of 15 and 45 reporting using some type
of contraception within the last month.
The need to establish a central unit in the government to promote contraceptive usage,
demonstrates how important limiting population growth is as a basic element of Indonesia’s
development strategy, despite some opposition from conservative religious elements. At the
same time, the historical major support for family planning (USAID) is no longer supporting
BKKBN in Indonesia.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 24
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
4.4 Community Health Program development
Because of limited budget very few initiatives (with the exception of the Puskesmas program)
were implemented nationally. Moreover an approach of program development, evaluation,
further expansion, further evaluation, and eventually bringing the program up to scale if the
program had proved effective was the way in which most program in community health pro-
grams (such as the growth monitoring, IDD, and Vitamin A program, had been developed).
One of the large scales health programs implemented with a crash program, was the Village
Midwife (Bidan di desa), program in which every village (approximately 72,000) received a
midwife for several years supported by central funds. This program was initiated in the early
90’s and continued on thru the mid 90’s. However isolated villages with small populations
had a hard time keeping midwives, as their volume of work is limited, as was the financial
support by the local population. After finishing their contract if unmarried they would often
move to urban areas where they could do enough deliveries to make adequate living. The
midwife remains the primary health care worker in most rural areas, not only providing repro-
ductive health services, but also basic medical care, and other public health services.
4.5 Budgets and Funds flow
Before decentralization, five year plans were developed with objects, goals, targets and
budget estimates. Various units of the government were evaluated on how many of their
targets were achieved, and budgets for future activities depended on previous performance.
There have been traditionally two budgets, an operational budget, and a development
budget.
The operational budget is released every month, so that salaries can be paid, and utilities
supplied to the offices. But the development budget is often not released until later in the
year. This has become consistently problematic since decentralization, with development
budgets not being released until there is only 5-6 months to utilize the funds. According to
the decentralization laws, the districts are not only responsible for the implementation of the
health program, but also for funding the health program.
The district government budget (APBD) consists of funds allocated from the central level
(balancing fund), and funds generated from the local tax (PAD). The balancing funds further
consist of (a) revenue sharing funds (DBH), (b) general allocation funds (DAU), and (c) spe-
cific allocation funds (DAK) that are used for financing physical infrastructure. In addition,
districts also receive funding from the central level for rendering health services for the poor.
This has been started since the economic crisis hit the country in 1998 and initially seen as a
social safety net program, and currently seen as the implementation of the constitution
clause on the government’s responsibility to protect the welfare of the poor.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 25
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
APBD (District Budget):
• a. Balancing Fund
- Revenue Sharing Fund (DBH)
- General Allocation Fund (DAU)
- Specified Allocation Fund (DAK)
• b. Local Tax Revenue (PAD)
Indirectly, districts also receive support from the central Government through two additional
funding mechanisms. The first is the “Deconcentration” budget, allocated by the central level
to the province. This is actually the provincial budget used among other things to support
districts in areas such as capacity building (training), technical assistance, coordination, etc.
The second one is the “Co-administered Task Fund” (Tugas Perbantuan or TP), allocated by
the central level to the district that has been assigned to perform a specific task related to
certain central (MoH) policies.
The analysis of district health accounts under the fiscal decentralization as described above
revealed evidence for performance constraints:
• DAU in many district was spent mostly for salary
• The remaining DAU is used to share 10% of the DAK (this is regulated in Law #
33/2004 on fiscal decentralization)
• DAK is mostly used for physical infrastructure, civil works, and equipment
• Revenue Sharing Funds (DBH) are only available if the district has revenues from
mining, forestry and agro farming
• Local tax revenue (PAD) is relatively small especially in districts/municipalities
with little industrial activity
With these conditions, health programs have been suffering from insufficient operating and
maintenance budgets that in turn affected the performance of health services, facilities, and
public health programs.
DHS-1 and its TA has been proposing and advocating a major reform in the fiscal de-centralization as to assure the availability of sufficient funds to cover operating and maintenance costs for service delivery. The proposed reform is to eliminate restriction
that DAK can only be used for physical infrastructure so that DAK can also be used for pro-
gram operating costs. Another major reform proposed is to shift the “deconcentration fund” to
become a “specified block grant” to the district level, earmarked only for program operating
costs. This reform will assure improved availability of funds to cover operating costs at the
district level which is essential for improving health program performance.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 26
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
4.6 Health Service Utilization
Major constraints to improved utilization of medical care lie in poor quality of service supply,
and in weak community demand for these services, which often were developed and imple-
mented without community assistance. In terms of access to and utilisation of services, ba-
sic primary health care including maternal and child health, outpatient services for moderate
illness, inpatient services for severe illness, and prevention and public health programs (vac-
cination and family planning programs) will be discussed.
Level Public Services Management of Public Services Private Services
Neighborhoods Posyandu Midwife, Women’s Group(PKK), health cen-ter staff
Traditional Birth At-tendants, Shaman, "Healers"
Village
Midwives (Birthing Huts), family planning coordinators Sub health centers
Health Center Staff, Vil-lage Head man
Religious boarding schools, private physi-cians
Sub District
Health Center (outpa-tient care, in some places delivery referral, delivery management
District Health Office which is under the control of "Bupati", and local par-liament
Private physicians, Public physicians after hours treatment, mid-wives, nurses, mid-wife,
District District Hospital
District Hospital office not linked with public health office, but also under the control of Bupati and local parliament.
Private physicians, Private Hospitals (profit, and non-profit facilities)
Province
Provencal Hospital Training of public health staff Coordination of district efforts
Governor, provincial fam-ily planning offices
Private physicians, Private Hospitals (profit, and non-profit facilities)
National
Teaching hospitals, Public health programs Community Health Ser-vices Communicable Disease control, Standards, Licensing Food Safety Nutrition
Ministry of Education, Ministry of Health, family planning National Development Planning agency, Parliament Ministry of Finance Ministry of home affairs Food and Drug Admini-stration Agriculture
Private physicians, private Hospitals, poly clinics, family planning services. Food manufactures
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 27
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
The structure of the health system from the village to the national level, and the responsibili-
ties of the various elements of the system are described above. This system works covers
the larger population centers, but there are many isolated, remote, and poor population in
Indonesia that are not covered by this system.
Local Government & Parliament
Placing MNCH high on district policy agendas
MIS
QA/QI/QC
Capacity to supervise
Planning & Budgeting
Advocacy
Community participation
Transportation
Health promotion
BCC
Incentive system
SSN for the poor
Cost effective interventions
Incentive system
HRH
Infrastructure & equipment
Hospital,Puskesmas,Polindes,
Midwives,Private
providers
Mother,Family,Local
community
Menu for capacity building
IT/GIS, Surveillance, IHPB, DHA, Prospect, Supervision, DTPS, etc
DHO
DemandSupply
MCH, FP, Immunization, Delivery by Health Staff, Maternal Nutrition,
Breastfeeding Nutrient, Under-5 Nutrient, Infant Nutrition, IMCI, Environment Hygiene,
Household Sanitation, etc
Partnership with NGOs & other sectors
DHS supports
Regulation
The grand design developed by TA-2579-INO6 illustrates the roles that various projects can
take, and a menu of interventions, and community mobilization (demand side) activities for
increased utilization of health services (supply side) that might influence how the health, pub-
lic health and family planning services are perceived and utilized by various communities.
Self reliance is also an important attribute of the Indonesian culture. Families and communi-
ties both will do their best to take care of problems within the family, not realizing that the
pooling of efforts between families, communities and market segments is usually a more effi-
cient way of dealing with health care needs, and health promotion. So while supply of medi-
cal care is available in Indonesia, and geographical access is usually not a major barrier, it is
of low quality (both in terms of health care facilities, and also level of training of the provider).
6 Sharpening the Focus of the DHS-1 Project on Decentralized Maternal Neonatal Child Health Services and the Impact on Capital Absorption: Bringing Project and Program into Alignment
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 28
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Therefore in most areas of Indonesia (with the exception of urban areas and several smaller
provinces) the demand for Government health services is low. However throughout the coun-
try there are facilities that are highly utilised and several district/city governments have made
significant improvement in out patient services using DHS funds.
The role of the district health office in organizing and managing health services can also be
an obstacle to health care utilization. How well the district health is staffed and organized,
and how it is funded (which depends on how well it does advocacy with local district parlia-
ments and government), will also affect the quality of the services, and the community de-
mand for those services. Equally important is the ability of the district health office in forming
partnerships with other government offices (Bappeda, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Social
Welfare, Hospital services, Police) and local NGO’s and local businesses and industry.
This health system was developed when 85% of the health market was rural, and there was
a large population of landless agricultural workers. This rural based health model is still the
standard for health care, despite the growing number of new health consumer segments,
and a 45% urban population. The rich of the large cities go to Singapore or Malaysia for in-
patient health care for many chronic and high risk diseases. Limited access to appropriate
health care in Indonesian is a phenomenon across all health product consumer segments.
There are two major issues in terms of access to care.
• The first is that not all medical products demanded by various consumers of
medical services in Indonesia are available. Yet some hospitals in the city of
Batam primarily deliver services to customers looking at bargains from Singapore;
• The second is that government services are not as widely utilized, with consum-
ers of all levels of income preferring to deal with government medical officers dur-
ing their “private” afternoon clinics, than go to the government facilities.
In order to review barriers to care several levels shall be looked at: The first is utilization of
health services and public health programs between the rich and the poor. Much research
has gone into the area of disparities of health status and health care utilization by level of
economic attainment. It has been demonstrated to be true in developed as well as in under-
developed countries, countries with “free market” health care.
We will start our investigation into barriers to utilization of public health and primary health
care with the hypothesis that socio economic attainment and disparity is the primary determinant of utilization of health services.
This implies that cost (direct and indirect cost) of health care is the primary obstacle to utili-
zation of health services. Figure 3 below shows how socio-economic attainment influences
birthing and delivery by type of maternal health care provider across the five quintiles of per
capita daily expenditure in Indonesian in 2007.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 29
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Figure 3:
If one considers midwife, doctor, or nurse to be appropriate delivery assistance, and delivery
by a traditional birth attendant (Dukun) or family member to be inappropriate, then the role of
household socio-economic status in determining birthing patterns is obvious. Richer families
use doctors and midwives almost exclusively, while only slightly over 50% of the mothers
giving birth in the last year reported using a midwife or doctor.
If this hypothesis is correct, as the health system improves its program for medical assis-
tance to the poor, the access for the poor will improve, and this should be the primary policy
tool for improved service utilization (and also for increased consumer expenditure for health).
But since “reformasi” in the late 1990’s, the Government of Indonesia has tried to be more
responsive to the needs of its vast population, by decentralizing functional and financial re-
sponsibly to the district. Almost 25% of Indonesia’s districts are now experimenting with
some type of “free” outpatient care for certain population segments, and in some districts the
entire population can utilize the outpatient health services at no direct cost.
A review of the national health care utilization statistics of selected districts throughout the
DHS provinces, some with high utilization and high poverty, some with low poverty levels
and low utilization rates, has led to some conclusions. The highest performing districts were
analysed with regard to the various indicators of utilization. The following paragraphs will
start analysing national data and discuss information gathered through personal observation
and interviews with various health care providers and consumers across Indonesia.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 30
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
4.7 Poverty as a Barrier to Health Service Utilisation
Several indicators of health care utilization, including outpatient visits, inpatient visits, as-
sisted delivery, measles immunization, and contraceptive prevalence rates will be used as
the primary indicators of health service utilisation.
4.7.1 General considerations
What can be said about Indonesia is that it is a vast country and the barriers to care vary
among regions, and among consumer segments within the regions. Indonesia is a wealthy
country with many natural resources, however much of the population lives below the 1$ per
person per day cut off that the Millennium Development Goals set as a threshold for accept-
able income for living adequately.
The household expenditure pattern in Indonesia in 2007 is illustrated below. In breaking it
into five quintiles we can see that for unadjusted income about 50% of the population lives in
households spending less than 1$ per person / day. If that is adjusted for purchasing parity
(price differentials throughout the country), than about 20% of the country lives in households
spending less than $1 per person per year.
Figure 4: Per-capita daily expenditure quintiles Susenas 2007
In this analysis, the proportion of the population in the bottom two quintiles within the various
districts was used as a proxy measure for poverty. The national average in the two bottom
quintiles should be 40%, but some rich districts have 80% of their population in the top quin-
tile, while some very poor ones have 80% of its population in the bottom two quintiles.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 31
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
4.7.2 Utilisation of outpatient services
Utilization of outpatient health services implies a disease state. In 20077 approximately 25%
of the entire population reported being “sick” in the preceding month. The majority of those ill
(80%), reported self treating their illness. Only 44% of those ill went to a provider of health
services (private or public). Almost 50% of the richest families in Indonesia reported seek-
ing outpatient care when ill, while only 38.1% of the poorest families sought care when ill.
This gives a ratio or “equity index” suggesting that the rich utilize the outpatient health care
system 30% more than the poor in 2007.
Figure 5: Equity Index for outpatient care Susenas 2007
However, about 50% of outpatient care services used by people from the lowest expenditure
quintiles are private services for which the patient must pay 3-5 times more than with public
health services; and most bottom quintile households spend more for Tobacco than for
health care services. This suggests that direct “costs” for health services are not a primary
factor influencing utilization of health services. It is also interesting to note that the use of
traditional practitioners has nearly died off in Indonesia, and, while still seen, has almost
been replaced by self treatment as the population has become more educated and affluent.
Outpatient and inpatient utilization vary a great deal across the provinces in Indonesia, and
Bali which has the highest utilization is also a relatively prosperous location within Indonesia.
However, NTB and NTT which are both areas with a vast amount of poverty also have high
levels of outpatient utilization, while Central Kalimantan, and the Islands of Riau, which are
both relatively prosperous have low levels of outpatient utilization.
7 2007 Susenas Core Data Individual data set
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 32
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Not only does household income have low impact on utilization of outpatient services, but
community wealth also does not appear to be a good predictor of outpatient utilization.
Figure 5 a + b: Outpatient and inpatient utilization by province, Susenas 2007
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 33
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Figure 6: Equity ratio between provinces for outpatient services 2007
We compared the ratio (equity index) of utilization between the rich and poor across the vari-
ous income segments in the province, and found a great deal of regional variation. In Yogja-
karta, and North Maluku the equity index is close to one which means equal access and utili-
zation of outpatient services between the rich and the poor.
However, in some provinces there is an extreme difference. Perhaps “The islands of Riau”
province represents the most extreme example. The province is relatively prosperous, and
has only a small proportion of its population in the bottom quintile living in isolated fishing
communities, far from the urban areas, south of Singapore, where over 70% of the popula-
tion live in two large cities. It is also a DHS-1 area, and they are now aware of the problem,
and have had several policy meetings (funded by DHS-1) to review various strategies to ad-
dress the issue of outpatient care, and improve the access for poor remote areas. They
have also undertaken a study tour to other provinces that are developing plans for this issue.
4.7.3 Utilisation of in-patient services
Differences in inpatient utilisation rates between the rich and the poor is much greater than
the difference in outpatient utilisation. In 2007, at the national level, the rich were over two
times as likely to utilise in-hospital care, than the poor. This is illustrated below. The prov-
inces with the biggest difference for in-hospital service utilisation rates between the rich and
the poor are in areas with very small “poor” populations, that being Riau, and Jakarta. Prov-
inces with the lowest levels of inequity have a great deal of poor people, such as NTB,
Papua, North Sumatera, and Central Sulawesi.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 34
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
It is interesting to note the “Islands of Riau” has one of the best equity index on inpatient care
(close to one), which suggests that all consumer income segments have equal access to
inpatient care, but not outpatient care.
Figure 7: Inpatient Equity Index 2007 Susenas
Quality inpatient services to the poor remain a challenge to the development of the health
care system in Indonesia. This is partly due to financial challenges, partly due to cultural
issues, and the need for the entire family to participate in an “in-patient” medical treatment.
Very few hospitals in Indonesia have been designed to accommodate an entire family, but
among the rural poor, a visit to a hospital is not made alone. Moreover the need to staff
hospitals in small and remote districts with adequate number of specialist remains a chal-
lenge because of the income differentials between urban and rural specialty practices.
4.7.4 Assisted birthing rates
The equity index for assisted delivery also has a great deal of variation across the regions as
can be seen in figure 8 below. The five best provinces in terms of equity of access and utili-
zation of birthing services between the rich and the poor are Jakarta, Yogjakarta, Bali, Riau,
and North Sulawesi. The six provinces with the highest levels in equity between economic
strata for assisted delivery are North Maluku, Papua, Banten, West Java, NTT, and Ambon.
Not all of these areas are necessarily poor, but access to trained health personnel to assist
in delivery is problematic in the Eastern Islands of Indonesia. West Java and Banten con-
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 35
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
tinue having low utilization of obstetric services among the poor too, but access is less an
issue, and the effect of belief on preferences for delivery services is also strong in these ar-
eas.
Figure 8, Equity Index for assisted Delivery – Susenas 2007
4.7.5 Contraceptive prevalence
Figure 8A, Equity Index for Contraceptive Prevalence Rate – Susenas 2007
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 36
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
As mentioned earlier, besides the Ministry of Health, the Family Planning Board also has a
significant role in targeting reproductive health services. In particular, the mission of BKKBN
is to target contraceptive access to the poor across Indonesia. As can be seen in figure 8A
contraceptive prevalence nationally indicates that poor mothers use contraceptives more
than the households of higher income, except for four provinces that do not take part in the
DHS programme.
The national average is below one which suggests that at country level, BKKBN is meeting
its mission of getting contraceptives to the poor. However in several provinces with high
number of poor people such as NTT and Maluku, the inequity of utilization of contraception
between the poor and the rich is also troublesome.
4.7.6 Immunisation and other preventative health services
Immunization is a service managed by the health centers, Posyandu, and the village mid-
wives. When vaccines are available, they do a reasonably good job of immunizing most of
the children. Less than 18 percent of the children report not receiving a measles vaccination
before their first birthday. The community demand for immunization insures a relative good
distribution. In all of the areas with strong community developed health programs, it has
been observed that all children are immunized completely.
Figure 9 Children 12-24 months reporting no immunization by quintile
The limitations of the immunization service system do not affect the contact with the various
consumer segments by the health center immunization team, but the adequacy of the immu-
nization. Most immunization (other than BCG and measles) require multiple doses but not all
children are getting adequate dosage.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 37
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Moreover RiskesDas demonstrates that certain areas while having high levels of measles
vaccination, they also have very high levels of reported measles, suggesting that cold chain
failure might be influencing the efficacy of the vaccines administered.
Figure 10: Number of doses of vaccine reported by children aged 12-24 months
As demonstrated earlier, the rich tends to utilize obstetric services more than the poor; it is
therefore logical to assume that levels of assisted birthing could be explained by poverty.
Figure 11 Poverty and levels of assisted birthing
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 38
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
As can be seen in these figures for DHS-2 districts, poverty is a reasonable predictor for lev-
els of assisted birthing coverage. However there are some other trends that are more under
the influence of the provincial policies. South Sumatra has many districts at high level of
coverage despite high levels of poverty, suggesting that government policy can promote high
levels of birthing in areas of high poverty.
Measles vaccine coverage in children between 12-24 months seems to have no relation to
poverty, as seen in figure 12. In fact some of the poorest districts have very good coverage,
or utilization of outpatient service as seen in figure 13.
NTT with the lowest levels of assisted birthing has the highest coverage in immunisation
against measles, as well as outpatient utilization. Most of the DHS-2 districts have low levels
of assisted delivery, but they are above the national average with regard to anti-measles im-
munisation. Not all elements of the health system have the same capacity in the same re-
gion. Consequently it is not possible to judge the performance of regions based on one utili-
sation indicator, as every region seems to have one area where it excels over the others.
Figure 12 Poverty and measles immunization
It is also interesting to note in figure 13 below, that NTT has very high levels of outpatient
utilization, some of the highest within Indonesia. So while NTT has high levels of immunisa-
tion coverage, and the poor and rich are alike in utilising outpatient health services, they are
not likely to utilize health staff for assisted birthing. They are however likely to utilize outpa-
tient services.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 39
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Figure 13 Poverty and outpatient utilization
Concerning the impact of “poverty” on health service utilization, one can say that poverty ap-
pears to influence a family’s choice for delivery assistance; it does not however appear to
influence immunization coverage and the utilization of outpatient services (only a little).
There are other obstacles, some of them related to accessibility, some to the lack of effi-
ciency of public services; but a great deal of low utilization rates have to do with community
demand, and its ability to attract and maintain adequately trained health personnel. Projects
need to work on demand creation as well as infrastructure and systems development.
Table 1 below summarizes the trends in utilization rates as seen in various SUSENAS sur-
veys undertaken between 2000 and 07. Rates of self treatment tend to fluctuate over time,
hovering around 70%, but self treatment is similar across the household expenditure quin-
tiles with the poor opting for self treatment slightly more often than the highest quintile. Out-
patient utilisation was steady from 2000 to 06 but jumped almost 25% from 2006 to 07, and
equity of access improved. This was also true for inpatient utilization, with a 60% increase in
2007. Contraceptive prevalence rates did not increase but the equity index improved. As-
sisted delivery from 2006 to 2007 increased slightly, but equity of access did not.
The utilization of out- and inpatient services took a major jump between 2006 and 2007.
This is partly due to funds made available to pay for health services to the poor, but this must
also be supported by increased demand. It is unclear how the increase in demand was
achieved. Assisted birthing has increased over the last seven years and become more equi-
table. However the jump seen in inpatient and outpatient services between 2006 and 2007
was not seen in assisted birthing or contraceptive prevalence rates, suggesting that increase
seen in outpatient and inpatient utilization was not a system wide improvement in outreach.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 40
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Table 1: Utilization of basic health services 2000 – 2007
2000 2004 2005 2006 2007
Self treatment 62.90% 72.60% 69.90% 71.40% 65.00%
Equity index self treatment 0.93 0.96 0.97 0.93
Outpatient care (contact rate) 35.80% 38.10% 34.40% 34.10% 44.10%
Equity index contact rate 1.35 1.43 1.38 1.3
Inpatient care 1.10% 1.00% 1.20% 1.20% 2.00%
Equity index inpatient 4.68 3.94 3.61 3.23
Assisted delivery 63.50% 72.90% 73.40% 75.10% 75.40%
Equity index assisted delivery 1.78 1.72 1.64 1.69
Contraceptive prevalence rate (cpr) 54.30% 56.70% 57.80% 57.90% 57.40%
Equity index (cpr) 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.88
The poor can access outpatient services. The rich however tends to utilize health services
more frequently than the poor. At district level, poverty does not always predict inpatient
utilization, even with the large difference that exists between the rich and the poor house-
holds in the utilization of these services.
While direct costs of services influence utilization, the indirect costs for transportation and the
time lost (for the patient and family members) also have an impact on the utilization of outpa-
tient services, especially among the poor who are predominately rural landless agricultural
labourers.
Table 2 Rural urban population of Indonesia by household expenditure quintile 2007
household expenditure
quintile Total
HouseholdsTotal Popu-
lation
% Rural Population
living in rural areas
Mean Per-capita Daily Expenditure
household size
1 11,231,106 52,659,892 79.6% 4,704 4.69
2 11,553,773 47,987,296 69.6% 6,732 4.15
3 11,214,530 43,804,886 58.3% 8,755 3.91
4 10,809,705 40,064,730 43.8% 11,769 3.71
5 12,069,399 40,660,606 20.4% 22,570 3.37
Total 56,878,513 225,177,410 56.3% 11,048 3.96
Indonesia is in the midst of a demographic transition. Both in terms of its age structure as
well as its urbanisation: In 1980, the 85% of the population was residing in rural areas, in
1995 it was 65%, and in 2007 56.3%. Moreover, table 2 illustrates, that most of the popula-
tion of household quintile one is living in rural areas whereas only 20% of quintile 5 do live in
a rural environment.
Policy Dialogue: Access Barriers to Health Care
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 41
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
It is assumed, considering the higher potential for income, that the younger population will
continue migrating to urban areas, and that many rural areas will be transformed into urban
zones as their labor markets are transformed by the expansion of industrial production.
Although women in the bottom quintile report higher levels of contraception usage, the family
size in the bottom quintile is larger than the national average (4.69 vs. 3.96), and almost 1.3
heads larger than the average family of the top quintile (3.37). This suggests that more ef-
forts are needed in family planning in order to promote sustained and equitable economic
growth for all economic strata of the population.
Table 3: Midwives Practice by Village Size
VILLAGESIZE
Nb. of Midwives < 500 500 to 1500 1500 to 2500 2500 to 5000 5000 to 10000 > 10000 Total
0 9,198 92.7% 14,703 77.8% 6,871 56.9% 6,541 37.8% 1,917 22.2% 425 14.1% 39,655
1 710 3.1% 4,015 17.3% 4,690 20.3% 8,826 38.1% 4,216 18.2% 701 3.0% 23,158
2 10 0.3% 151 3.9% 380 9.8% 1,313 33.9% 1,395 36.0% 626 16.2% 3,875
3 3 0.2% 26 1.6% 94 6.0% 412 26.1% 617 39.1% 424 26.9% 1,576
4 1 0.1% 9 1.2% 33 4.4% 148 19.6% 271 35.8% 295 39.0% 757
6+ 0 0.0% 3 0.4% 13 1.5% 74 8.7% 213 25.2% 543 64.2% 846
Total 9,922 18,907 12,081 17,314 8,629 3,016 69,869
In table 3 above we have the number of birthing facilities by the size of the village. In vil-
lages less that 500 people 92.7% do not have trained midwives, while in villages with over
10,000 only 14.1% do not have midwives. This suggests that still there are not enough mid-
wives to meet all needs. As a matter of fact, isolated rural areas are less likely to attract a
midwife. And, in small villages there are normally less than 6 births a year to attend, cer-
tainly not enough to maintain a practice, unless the midwife is a resident of that village. To
insure adequate coverage of delivery assistance in small villages, mobile midwife services
are needed, and incentives (such as reimbursement of travel costs and per diem) to initiate
midwives to travel periodically to the more remote and isolated areas.
If the government chooses to place health personnel in a remote and isolated area, they
have to provide some type of subsidy to help them maintaining their practice. If possible,
candidates from rural areas should be trained to increase the probability that they will stay in
post, once deployed to the rural facility. Moreover, career development needs should be
considered, and refresher courses offered; a wider scope of work opportunities may help
maintaining the professional spirit and involvement with the community.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 42
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
5 Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Reflecting on the various lessons learned in the various field trips, the TA team has identified
six major issues that appear to be affecting utilization with the DHS supported health system.
The following chapter summarizes the team’s findings, discussions with health care provid-
ers, consumers, planners and mangers of the health care system.
Health centres are built on a standard plan, but their utilization varies greatly. The average
Health Centre sees about 25 outpatients a day (with a staff of 20-30), although there are a
few high performers seeing more than 200 patients per day. These health centers are usu-
ally located in urban, or on the edge of urban areas. The most highly utilized health facilities
are surrounded by vendors, transport for hire, and have patients waiting for services.
The DHS1 and DHS2 loans were designed under the premise that under-utilization of these
health centres was one of the major obstacles to improving the health status of the popula-
tion, and that giving them a fresh coat of paint, and some minor repairs along with some ad-
ditional equipment would increase the contact rate, and improve the health status. As a mat-
ter of fact, the utilization of outpatient and inpatient contacts did jump last year, but it was a
system wide increase, not limited to provinces with decentralization projects.
The TA tem identified seven crucial issues influencing health care utilization, which are:
1. One size does not fit all
2. Free health services do not insure high utilization
3. Attitude of health workers towards consumers has an impact and (financial and
non-financial) incentives for health staff are important
4. Quality services make a difference
5. New financial regulations every year make project implementation difficult
6. Community ownership determines utilization
5.1 One Size Does Not Fit All
Indonesia is going through an epidemiological transition with coronary vascular diseases,
and in some areas surprising infectious diseases, becoming a major burden. It is also going
through a demographic transition with a much older median age than 30 years ago, marked
by accelerating rates of urbanization. The population is becoming better educated, older,
consuming more, and is less isolated from world trends. Yet, despite decentralization, giving
the opportunity to districts to develop a health system based on the needs of their population,
most districts have generally continued to look to the center (Ministry of Health) for financial
support and direction for program development and expansion.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 43
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
The vision and enthusiasm of the local government, and its ability to work with other units of
the government, and enlist the assistance of NGO’s and other social organizations to im-
prove health care delivery is one of the attributes to differentiate the district’s ability to mobi-
lize a strong community health program, well utilized by the consumers. Several of these
districts are in DHS1 and DHS2 project areas, but the PHP districts of the World Bank de-
centralization program has also produced several very good practice examples.
The future of health development in Indonesia depends on the capacity of the district health
office to meet the needs of the various consumer segments in their area, using resources
locally available. The contributions of the center e.g. through the construction of clinics and
hospitals and the supply of equipment, are probably of less importance, than the investments
in human resource development, and the development of local systems for managing impor-
tant health issues. If the system is improved and more community involvement generated,
than the system will be more responsive to the needs of that population.
In both DHS-1 and DHS-2 there were funds for operational research on local health issues.
DHS-1 appeared to utilize the funds in terms of situational analysis, however, there was very
little follow-up research done to look at the impact of various initiatives undertaken during the
loan periods. The importance of data and monitoring of program development needs to be
promoted with local governments in a way that will insure appropriate evaluation.
Subsidized programs need to be developed to support medical care in remote and isolated
populations, but the local government needs to take the initiative in coming up with ways to
get the local community to participate in and pay for many of these services, particularly for
services and products that are in high demand.
In urban areas there is a different demand for health services, and consumers’ needs should
be considered. Loosing market share of certain health services to nearby countries is also
not appropriate, and ways to capture these consumer segments with more cost-effective
high quality local service providers need to be developed.
For those services that are considered “Public Goods” by the government (Immunization,
MCH services, Primary Health Care), the programs need some support and direction from
the central government. But consumers, particularly in urban areas should help define the
nature of the health services, and programs in their area, and help develop health care as
part of the local economy. Health care has the capacity to contribute to the economic devel-
opment of Indonesia, not only as something that makes Indonesian healthier and economi-
cally more productive, but also as a contributor to the gross domestic product.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 44
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
5.2 Free Health Services Do Not Insure High Utilization
There are a number of districts experimenting with free access to outpatient services, and
the country as a whole is dealing with the issue of free inpatient medical care for the poor.
This is an evolving process, and much adjustment will be needed before the goal of a sus-
tainable system of supporting the poor to get adequate health care is achieved.
Districts have had different results with their experiments. The TA team visited one district
where the remission of charges had no significant impact on health care utilization. Asking
the consumers the TA found out that most of the health centers did not offer the complete
range of services for which the family was looking for. This district has one of the lowest
outpatient utilization rates in Indonesia, although it does not have high levels of poverty.
To confirm this result of the analysis, the TA visited a health centre within an area of endemic
poverty. The TA found that outpatient services were usually well utilised by the population,
when all types of services were delivered, even though the population had to travel to get
there, and pay a registration fee to utilize the service.
In another district we asked to see the “worst” and the “best” health centre. The “worst” cen-
tre, although run down, was staffed, busy with treatment of locals, and active with many
community outreach activities. The “best” health center, with new facilities and new equip-
ment located in a market area, had seen only two patients that day, and the health center
staff did not show much initiative in community outreach, partly because they did not have
support for this kind of activity.
In the City of Batam, in the “Islands of Riau” Province, free health care has almost ruptured
the City’s annual budget because of increased demand, and has had a negative impact on
public health services, because of the high number of people requesting care.
Obviously, direct costs of health services are not the major obstacle to access. As long as
the population in the catchment area feels the health center is “theirs”, they utilize it quite
heavily. If it is viewed as belonging to the government, and the staff is not viewed as “mem-
bers of the community”, than the services of the health centre will be less utilized.
5.3 Attitude of Health Workers towards Consumers Has an Impact
While most health centre staff are helpful and respectful to the clients who seek care at the
clinic, there are other indicators that community members will take as a sign of how the
community health workers feel toward them.
If the health centre is closed and locked up by 11:00 AM, that is an indication that being
available for medical needs is not as important to the health worker than other activities that
they are involved in e.g. for family or financial reasons. If the health center staff only comes
one every three months to the posyandu (e.g. because of limited transportation allowance),
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 45
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
not only will the posyandu attendance go down, but the rural population will perceive it as a
sign that they are not important to the health workers. Health workers need incentives (in-
cluding institutional recognition) to perform at high standards.
However, though underpaid and operating for much of the year without adequate fi-
nancial support for community outreach, public health staff in Indonesia does a re-markable job in maintaining the health of the various communities.
During the TQM exercise in Central Sulawesi, health care provider sessions were held to
help them understand the relationship with clients, and how to encourage them by openness,
respect, and understanding. The transformation of government officials to civil servants
needs to be addressed and managed by the national government, e.g. through local gov-
ernment initiatives to work with communities to implement health policies and programs that
local villages want and that are in line with local, and national priorities.
One important domain of health sector reform is to make health workers more satisfied with
their jobs, this can be attained by better remuneration, and better management practices.
Local governments should be encouraged to experiment with new and innovative ap-
proaches to provide incentives to their staff.
5.4 Quality of Services make a Difference
One of the DHS loan goals was to improve the quality of health services through civil works
and the provision of new equipment. In some places, the local government contributed
funds, and completely rebuilt the health centre, making it larger, improving the quality of wait-
ing rooms and registration, and the layout of the building. Repainting and repair alone did
not seem to have much of an effect on utilization, truly improving the quality of facilities did, if
there was an associated attempt to improve the way in which services were delivered.
High quality services are less an issue of facility repair, than of concern and commitment to
the clients and the wellbeing of the patients. Moreover, health care workers need support
from local governments to meet the needs of their clients for both community and primary
health care services. The issue of ownership by the community is central, and the highest
quality services are provided by health care workers that are truly integrated into their com-
munities, regardless of the state of repair of their treatment center.
5.5 New Financial Regulations Every year Cause Difficulties
Decentralization has lead to new fund channelling mechanisms, and the establishment of
new provinces and districts has changed the boundaries of responsibility. One thing that has
consistently impacted on the implementation of the DHS projects is that development budg-
ets have been released late on every year, making it difficult to accomplish plans and pro-
curements in a timely fashion.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 46
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Not only are projects negatively impacted by this issue, but the implementation of activities
supported by local funds is also limited by this problem. In addition, new programs imple-
mented in a hurry (during the remainder of the year), are not implemented as well as if they
were done in a more systematic way from the very beginning of the financial year. Trying to
muddle through year after year makes solutions for immediate problems becoming more im-
portant than systematic health sector reform.
In addition to the delayed release of funds, the government has been changing regulations
concerning decentralization every year. One good example is the development of the KMK
35 regulation concerning cost sharing at the district level between loan and counterpart funds
(depending on the fiscal capacity) in the DHS-2. After a lot of efforts, the regulation was re-
scinded because it became “unworkable”, and fund allocation and management were again
centralized, despite the fact that provincial and district offices did a very good job in utilizing
their budgets: all provinces but three in DHS-2 exceeded 75% capital absorption, and dis-
tricts hit close to 70% capital absorption. However, the budget from the centre had been de-
layed, and only a small portion of the budget was utilized. It is uncertain, even after the loan
has been centralized, whether it will be able to achieve again the rates of capital absorption
reached in 2007 when the funds were executed primarily by the districts.
5.6 Community Ownership Determines Utilization
One of the over-riding factors in utilization is when the community sees the health program
as being theirs. This is the case in most of Bali, where the banjar system works with the
midwives and has village health committees. Similar effects were observed when exploring
various examples of early implementation of the Desa Siaga Program.
Community ownership is promoted by inspired leadership. The synergy between a strong
leader and a willing community is not something that can be easily developed, but takes con-
tinuous effort and work over time.
One district has experimented with community empowerment and community financing. In
Kolaka of Southeast Sulawesi, a program was developed that put nurses in villages to deal
with outpatient services and referrals as this area has a shortage of midwives and physi-
cians. The nurses receive some basic government financial support, equipment and drugs,
and then they receive “fees for services” for basic treatment. Some of the communities have
developed “risk pooling” mechanisms to pay the nurse a standard salary, and insure local
community members have 24 hour access to basic outpatient services. It turns out that this
resource pooling generates more revenues than expenses and has become a source of in-
come for the village.
Health services do have value, and particularly if people are paying for them, they feel a
sense of ownership. However entitlements for the poor could play an important role in im-
proving the medical care services in rural and poor areas of Indonesia.
Conclusions
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 47
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
6 Conclusions
6.1 General Conclusions
The major constraint to the development of well utilised health services within the Indonesian
Health Care System can not be found in a lack of commitment of the local or national Gov-
ernment. Far from it, the continuous efforts of the Government to implement a centrally de-
fined program based on the principle of health being a human right, rather than seeing health
care as an emerging market that is an element of the overall socio-economic development,
and that on its own turn contributes to the economic welfare of the community both by pro-
ducing healthier people and by generating jobs and secondary markets for health system
components and services, is an obstacle.
Health care needs to be delivered as a system, and the consumers, who already cover the
majority of health care expenditures in Indonesia, have the capacity to carry even a larger
part of the cost, particularly if the risk is pooled among the community members.
The issue of quality remains problematic throughout the health system, and limits the value
that consumers attach to this “commodity”. However, in some parts of the country such as
Bali, models of quality care are well accepted by the population and have reached high lev-
els of service provision to the community.
The major issue across the country is the lack of a sense of ownership by the local communi-
ties to the program promoted and developed. There are exceptions to this such as the Po-
syandu program, and the Family Planning Program of the “new order” government. These
programs were based on community participation and local ownership, but supervision, and
continuous quality improvement is needed in all these programs.
Decentralization offers an opportunity for district health programs to “take off”, in setting up
activities to accelerate the improvement of health status. A few districts under the dynamic
guidance of visionary leaders have made major improvements in their health system. Many
districts supported by ADB, the World Bank, and EU have pursued health sector reform
agendas in specific areas that they found important. As a result, the packages of services
available at health centres are remarkably similar across the country, but there is a shortage
of adequately trained health personnel throughout the country, but particularly in smaller
more remote districts.
6.2 Impact on Decentralisation and Health Sector Reform
Health Sector Reform continues to be an area of major concern in Indonesia. Decentraliza-
tion as a process is adapting to the variations in capacity that exist throughout the country.
While many districts have the capacity to use the potential of the decentralization laws to
Conclusions
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 48
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
develop new and more effective approaches towards health care, many still look to provincial
and national government for policy and strategy direction and financial support.
ADB has fielded two types of loans to support the social sector during social unrest, decen-
tralization and health sector reform in the last decade. The first was the social safety net
loans which were crucial in maintaining social services. It was during this period that DHS-1
was designed. The design of DHS-1 was based on lessons learned with the social safety
net, but did not anticipate all the changes that would come with decentralization, and it took a
while to develop bridging mechanisms that would allow the project to be implemented effec-
tively. DHS-2 was designed while DHS-1 was still figuring out how to make things work.
DHS-2 was more ambitious than DHS-1 in terms of health indicators to be improved, and the
number of managers involved within the system: Every district has an executive secretary,
and its own strategic plan. On top of this, the executive management changed every year
bringing in slightly different perceptions on what the loan should support.
The TA came at the time to be a catalyst in the performance of DHS-1, and has been a buff-
ering force between the national and the district governments during the inception of the
DHS-2 loan. With regard to the project’s substance, the TA’s important contribution for DHS-
1 was helping the project to focus on MNCH as directed by the Ministry of Health, followed
by various health reform initiatives in this specific area. As for the DHS-2, the TA helped
bringing back the project focus on MDG related issues as also emphasized in the MTR.
Another significant contribution of the TA to both DHS-1 and DHS-2 is promoting better use
of data for the planning at the central, provincial, and district level. Furthermore, TA visits to
districts, and especially to remote ones, helped the project being more responsive to local
needs and characteristics and more relevant to the local situation. It is also important to note
that the TA has played the role of bridging the projects reform to the national policy. A num-
ber of policy dialogues at the central Ministry of Health and BAPPENAS were the forums
where the TA helped transfer the project success into the policy reform.
While DHS-2 remains at risk because of the late release of funds, the district health offices
are moving ahead with plans for health sector reform and how to utilise the loan in 2009-
2010. It is hoped that the new MTR focus will help linking the districts, which are moving
forward, with the national office in a way that will encourage cooperation and support for
technically strong local initiatives.
6.3 Impact on Millennium Development Goals
District health offices need to face the next five year development period with a commitment
to insure that all districts in Indonesia meet the five health related Millennium Developments
Goals.
Conclusions
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 49
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
• MDG 1 on adequacy of dietary intake can be reached, but certain districts need to
be target for intense intervention.
• MDG-4 on child mortality is a reachable target, but the results of the 2007 demo-
graphic health survey suggest that little progress has been made over the last 5
years in achieving the goal.
• Achieving MDG-5 on maternal health will take an extra effort, particularly in DHS-
2 areas.
• MDG-6 on infectious diseases can be reached, but it will take extra effort, and
• MDG-7 on sanitation can also be reached, but many districts will have to work
very hard in order to achieve it.
The key to continued progress on the MDG’s is to work with the communities on how they
plan to achieve these goals. Strengthening the health component of village based develop-
ment programs hold great promise. These programs also have access to funds much larger
than available to the Ministry of Health. The TA suggests that DHS-2 experiment with ways
to increase community communication with District Health Offices, and that local communi-
ties be mobilized in community based development efforts to meet these goals.
6.4 Recommendations for Future TA
In order to determine whether the health sector reforms initiated under this loan are effective
and sustainable, more evaluation needs to be done. Future technical assistance should take
a more proactive approach towards program evaluation. Local governments, provincial gov-
ernments, and the national secretariat should work together to identify operations research
topics for implementation and review. This means that program evaluation, and information
management will be two areas that need additional technical support.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 50
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
7 Annexes
7.1 TA-3579-INO Logical Framework
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
51
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
TA 3
579-
INO
LO
GIC
AL
FRA
MEW
OR
K
Nar
rativ
e Su
mm
ary
of
Proj
ect S
trat
egie
s Pe
rfor
man
ce T
arge
ts
(Ver
ifiab
le In
dica
tors
) M
onito
ring
Mec
hani
sms
(Sou
rces
of I
nfor
mat
ion)
A
ssum
ptio
ns
A. G
OA
L: T
A 3
579-
INO
sha
res
the
goa
ls o
f the
DH
S Pr
ojec
ts:
GO
AL
of D
HS-
1:
Im
prov
ed h
ealth
sta
tus
of th
e
p
opul
atio
n in
all
Proj
ect d
istr
icts
G
oal o
f DH
S-2:
Impr
oved
hea
lth s
tatu
s of
the
pop
ulat
ion,
esp
ecia
lly th
e po
or
a
nd v
ulne
rabl
e gr
oups
DH
S-1
Goa
l Tar
gets
: by
201
0, in
DH
S-1
proj
ect d
istri
cts:
•
Mat
erna
l mor
talit
y ra
tio (M
MR
)1 200
/ 10
0,00
0 liv
e bi
rths
or a
t lea
st 3
0% lo
wer
than
ben
chm
ark
data
•
Infa
nt m
orta
lity
rate
(IM
R)2 :
30 /
1000
live
birt
hs, o
r at
leas
t 30%
low
er th
an lo
cal b
ench
mar
k da
ta
• U
nder
-5 m
orta
lity
rate
(U5M
R)3 :
40 /
1000
chi
ldre
n un
der 5
yea
rs, o
r at l
east
30%
low
er th
an lo
cal
benc
hmar
k da
ta
• Li
fe e
xpec
tanc
y at
birt
h (L
EB)
4 : 70
yea
rs, o
r at l
east
2
year
s m
ore
than
loca
l ben
chm
ark
D
HS-
2 G
oal T
arge
ts:
by 2
010
in th
e pr
ojec
t are
a:
• M
DG
: red
uce
child
mal
nut.
from
34%
(199
5) to
22%
•
MD
G: r
educ
e U
5MR
from
51
(200
0) to
35/
1000
birt
hs
• M
DG
: red
uce
IMR
from
41
(200
0) to
25
live
birth
s •
MD
G: r
educ
e M
MR
from
470
(199
5) to
175
/100
,000
•
LEB
incr
ease
d >2
yea
rs fr
om lo
cal b
ench
mar
k da
ta.
DH
S-1
Goa
l Mon
itorin
g M
echs
: •
Ann
ual d
istri
ct h
ealth
pro
files
•
Uni
ted
Nat
ions
Chi
ldre
n’s
Fund
(U
NIC
EF)
and
Wor
ld H
ealth
O
rgan
izat
ion
(WH
O) d
ata
or
estim
ates
D
HS-
2 G
oal M
onito
ring
Mec
hs:
• B
PS a
nd S
US
ENS
dat
a •
BKK
BN d
ata
• U
NIC
EF a
nd W
HO
dat
a •
Dem
ogra
phic
& H
ealth
Sur
veys
•
Pov
erty
line
indi
cato
rs fr
om
SM
ERU
, SU
SEN
AS, W
orld
Ban
k,
and
BKK
BN.
DH
S-1
Goa
l Ass
umpt
ions
: •
Pol
itica
l sta
bilit
y in
DH
S-1
proj
ect
area
•
Con
tinue
d ec
onom
ic re
cove
ry
DH
S-2
Goa
l Ass
umpt
ions
:
[Non
e lis
ted]
B.
PUR
POSE
of T
A 3
579-
INO
1.
Ass
ist M
OH
and
sel
ecte
d lo
cal
g
over
nmen
ts id
entif
y, im
plem
ent
a
nd e
valu
ate
heal
th s
ecto
r ref
orm
s
i
n th
e co
ntex
t of d
ecen
tralis
atio
n.
2. S
uppo
rt D
HS
in m
eetin
g its
pur
pose
s:
a)
impr
oved
hea
lth a
nd fa
mily
pl
anni
ng s
ervi
ces
in p
roje
ct a
reas
b)
gu
aran
teed
acc
ess
of p
oor t
o es
sent
ial h
ealth
and
fam
ily
plan
ning
ser
vice
s
TA 3
579-
INO
Per
form
ance
Tar
gets
: •
Com
preh
ensi
ve lo
cal h
ealth
sec
tor d
evel
opm
ent
plan
s de
velo
ped
and
in u
se in
all
Proj
ect d
istri
cts
• In
crea
sed
publ
ic e
xpen
ditu
re b
udge
ted
for h
ealth
in
all P
roje
ct d
istri
cts
• Lo
cal h
ealth
soc
ial s
afet
y ne
t pro
gram
s fu
nctio
ning
in
all d
istri
cts
• Ti
mel
y pr
ovis
ion
of te
chni
cal a
ssis
tanc
e to
impr
ove
DH
S P
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion
at C
ente
r, pr
ovin
ces,
an
d di
stric
ts
TA 3
579-
INO
Mon
itorin
g M
echs
: •
Per
iodi
c re
ports
of T
A t
eam
m
embe
rs a
nd D
HS-
1 st
aff
• D
HS
eva
luat
ion
of b
udge
ts a
nd
expe
nditu
res
of s
elec
ted
site
s •
Loca
l gov
ernm
ent b
udge
t rev
iew
an
d as
sess
men
t by
expe
rts
• D
HS
mon
itorin
g m
echa
nism
s
TA
357
9-IN
O A
ssum
ptio
ns:
• D
efin
ition
of h
ealth
sec
tor
deve
lopm
ent p
lans
unc
hang
ed
• N
o un
expe
cted
cris
is in
oth
er
sect
ors
limiti
ng b
udge
t ava
ilabl
e •
No
maj
or in
fluxe
s of
poo
r int
o pr
ojec
t dis
trict
s •
No
maj
or u
nres
t in
Proj
ect a
reas
•
DH
S as
sum
ptio
ns a
re m
et
1 N
umbe
r of m
ater
nal d
eath
s per
100
,000
live
birt
hs.
Nat
iona
l MM
R is
est
imat
ed b
etw
een
390
and
450
(199
9).
2 Num
ber o
f dea
ths o
f chi
ldre
n be
twee
n 0
and
1 ye
ar o
f age
per
1,0
00 li
ve b
irths
. N
atio
nal I
MR
is e
stim
ated
at 4
0 (1
999)
. 3 N
umbe
r of d
eath
s of c
hild
ren
less
than
5 y
ears
old
per
1.0
00 li
ve b
irths
. N
atio
nal U
5MR
is e
stim
ated
at 5
6 (1
998)
. 4 N
atio
nal L
EB is
est
imat
ed a
t 68
year
s (19
99).
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
52
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Nar
rativ
e Su
mm
ary
of
Proj
ect S
trat
egie
s Pe
rfor
man
ce T
arge
ts
(Ver
ifiab
le In
dica
tors
) M
onito
ring
Mec
hani
sms
(Sou
rces
of I
nfor
mat
ion)
A
ssum
ptio
ns
C.
TA 3
579-
INO
OU
TPU
TS:
1. H
ealth
sec
tor r
efor
m (H
RS
) at
d
ecen
tralis
ed le
vels
2.
Hum
an c
apac
ity fo
r hea
lth s
yste
ms
man
agem
ent &
del
iver
y 3.
Hea
lth p
lans
bas
ed o
n ac
tual
cos
ts
4. D
ecis
ion
mak
er u
nder
stan
ding
of
p
ublic
hea
lth p
riorit
ies
5. O
pera
tiona
l res
earc
h ca
paci
ty
6. P
roje
ct m
anag
emen
t
• H
SR
iden
tifie
d in
100
% o
f Pro
ject
dis
trict
s
• H
SR
gui
delin
es d
evel
oped
and
dis
sem
inat
ed
• Te
n pe
rcen
t inc
reas
e pe
r yea
r in
achi
evem
ent o
f m
inim
um s
ervi
ce s
tand
ards
in D
HS
dis
trict
s •
Hea
lth s
ervi
ces
unit
cost
s de
term
ined
in a
t lea
st o
ne
dist
rict o
f eve
ry P
roje
ct p
rovi
nce
• P
ropo
rtion
of l
ocal
pub
lic h
ealth
bud
gets
allo
cate
d to
pr
even
tion/
prom
otio
n/ba
sic
serv
ices
up
by >
20%
•
Mor
e th
an 8
0% o
f ope
ratio
nal r
esea
rch
carr
ied
out
judg
ed re
leva
nt to
"ope
ratio
n" o
f hea
lth s
ervi
ces
• TA
ser
vice
s ac
cess
ible
to a
ll D
HS
dist
ricts
• Ex
perts
’ ass
essm
ents
of t
he
need
and
qua
lity
of lo
cal
refo
rms
•
Perfo
rman
ce m
onito
ring
syst
em; f
ield
vis
its
• R
epor
ts a
nd e
xper
t as
sess
men
ts
• R
evie
w o
f dis
trict
bud
gets
•
Expe
rts’ a
sses
smen
t of t
he
need
and
qua
lity
of O
R
impl
emen
ted
• Ye
arly
and
6-m
o TA
repo
rts
• C
omm
itmen
t of p
erso
nnel
at a
ll le
vels
to re
view
and
refo
rm
• Fl
exib
le n
atio
nal r
egul
atio
ns
• P
erso
nnel
dep
loym
ent s
yste
m
stab
ilised
•
Loca
l gov
ernm
ents
’ com
mitm
ent t
o th
e he
alth
sec
tor
• A
cces
s to
pro
ject
are
as is
not
co
mpr
omis
ed b
y se
curit
y pr
oble
ms
D. T
A 3
579-
INO
AC
TIVI
TIES
1.
Rev
iew
and
mon
itor s
tatu
s an
d ch
ange
s in
the
follo
win
g ar
eas:
a)
H
ealth
Sec
tor R
efor
m to
impr
ove
acce
ss to
and
qua
lity
of h
ealth
se
rvic
es fr
om p
ublic
and
priv
ate
sour
ces;
b)
Pr
otec
tion
of th
e he
alth
of t
he p
oor
and
mos
t vul
nera
ble;
c)
H
uman
and
non
-hum
an h
ealth
re
sour
ces;
d)
O
pera
tions
rese
arch
in h
ealth
se
rvic
es;
e)
Man
agem
ent c
omm
unic
atio
ns
incl
udin
g he
alth
info
rmat
ion
syst
ems,
mon
itorin
g;
f) C
omm
unic
atio
ns fo
r lia
ison
and
ad
voca
cy;
g)
Eval
uatio
n 2.
Ass
ist t
he h
ealth
sec
tor t
o id
entif
y op
portu
nitie
s fo
r ref
orm
at s
ervi
ce
deliv
ery,
dis
trict
, pro
vinc
e, a
nd c
entra
l le
vels
. 3.
Ass
ist h
ealth
sec
tor p
erso
nnel
to
deve
lop,
test
, im
plem
ent,
and
eval
uate
A
ssis
tanc
e pr
ovid
ed to
revi
ew a
nd im
prov
e he
alth
se
ctor
pol
icie
s / p
ract
ices
at a
ll le
vels
;
Cle
arer
und
erst
andi
ng o
f nat
iona
l hea
lth s
ecto
r pol
icy
at
perip
hera
l lev
els;
Impr
oved
und
erst
andi
ng o
f loc
al h
ealth
sta
tus
and
heal
th s
ervi
ces
trend
s;
K
ey a
reas
of h
ealth
ser
vice
s re
form
sch
emes
eva
luat
ed
in a
t lea
st o
ne a
rea:
a)
lo
cal h
ealth
insu
ranc
e sc
hem
es,
b)
stra
tegi
c re
sour
ces
allo
catio
n,
c)
heal
th fi
nanc
ing
advo
cacy
d)
pe
rform
ance
-bas
ed p
aym
ents
, e)
he
alth
car
e ef
ficie
ncy,
f)
drug
s us
e m
anag
emen
t, g)
w
orkf
orce
man
agem
ent,
h)
loca
l hea
lth in
form
atio
n sy
stem
s,
i) he
alth
car
e qu
ality
impr
ovem
ent,
j) op
erat
iona
l res
earc
h st
udie
s,
k)
orga
niza
tiona
l cul
ture
sup
porti
ng re
form
, l)
man
agem
ent o
f cap
ital a
sset
s,
m)
man
agem
ent o
f sup
plie
s,
n)
cons
umer
par
ticip
atio
n,
o)
publ
ic-p
rivat
e pa
rtner
ship
s.
M
etho
ds in
pla
ce a
t all
leve
ls to
mon
itor a
cces
s to
he
alth
ser
vice
s;
P
artn
ersh
ip w
ith p
rivat
e se
ctor
incr
easi
ng;
M
OH
/BK
KBN
par
tner
ship
impr
ovin
g;
Si
x-m
onth
sum
mar
ies
and
repo
rts o
f the
TA
team
Trip
repo
rt of
team
mem
bers
Tech
nica
l rev
iew
s as
requ
este
d by
cou
nter
parts
Topi
cal t
echn
ical
pap
ers
prod
uced
and
dis
sem
inat
ed
rela
ting
to h
ealth
ser
vice
s re
form
that
con
tribu
te
info
rmat
ion
from
els
ewhe
re in
In
done
sia
and
the
wor
ld
Pl
ans,
met
hodo
logy
, fin
ding
s,
and
criti
cal r
evie
w o
f ope
ratio
nal
rese
arch
und
erta
ken.
Lo
cal h
ealth
sec
tor p
erso
nnel
and
de
cisi
on m
aker
s ar
e w
illin
g to
sha
re
plan
ning
and
dev
elop
men
t with
pr
ofes
sion
als
incl
udin
g TA
from
ou
tsid
e th
e lo
cal a
rea
Le
sson
s le
arne
d an
d ex
perie
nce
else
whe
re m
ay b
e re
leva
nt to
the
proj
ect a
reas
Ade
quat
e co
mpl
emen
tary
fina
ncia
l re
sour
ces
will
be p
rovi
ded
by D
HS
an
d G
OI c
ount
erpa
rt fu
ndin
g.
E
ffect
ive
com
mun
icat
ions
in
Indo
nesi
an.
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
53
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
de
velo
p, te
st, i
mpl
emen
t, an
d ev
alua
te
refo
rms,
par
ticul
arly
at d
istri
ct a
nd
serv
ice
deliv
ery
leve
ls.
4. D
evel
op g
uide
lines
, tra
inin
g m
ater
ials
, an
d st
rate
gies
for d
esig
ning
, im
plem
entin
g, a
nd e
valu
atin
g re
form
s.
5. A
ssis
t in
the
eval
uatio
n,
docu
men
tatio
n, a
nd s
harin
g of
less
ons
lear
nt.
6. D
esig
n an
d co
ntra
ct o
pera
tions
re
sear
ch re
leva
nt to
nee
d of
hea
lth
sect
or re
form
pp
pg;
C
olla
bora
tion
with
oth
er s
ocia
l sec
tors
incr
easi
ng in
all
prov
ince
s an
d di
stric
ts;
M
etho
ds to
mon
itor h
ealth
ser
vice
s qu
ality
in p
lace
for
use
by a
ll pr
ovin
ces,
dis
trict
s, c
ities
;
Acc
ess
to h
ealth
ser
vice
s by
poo
r and
mos
t vul
nera
ble
impl
emen
ted
in a
ll di
stric
ts/c
ities
;
Opt
ions
for r
efor
m id
entif
ied
and
appr
aise
d in
co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith a
ll st
akeh
olde
rs;
Le
sson
s do
cum
ente
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed w
ithin
pro
ject
ar
eas
and
mor
e br
oadl
y;
In
crea
sed
oppo
rtuni
ties
for c
omm
unity
par
ticip
atio
n w
ithin
all
dist
ricts
and
pro
vinc
es;
O
pera
tions
rese
arch
for h
ealth
ser
vice
s re
form
de
sign
ed, i
mpl
emen
ted,
ana
lyze
d.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 54
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
7.2 Field Visits
Table 3 - 6 summarize the field visits carried out by the TA consultants during the period Au-
gust 2004 through September 2007.
Table 3 - Field Visits by TA Team Members, 2004, Inception Phase
When Province Who Purpose Nr of Visits
August
9 – 11 Bengkulu JD Learning current condition of health sector in Bengkulu and meeting with PHO 1
11 – 13 Pekanbaru (Riau) JD, JS Province Visit ; Meeting with PHO and stake holder 2
18 – 20
South east Su-lawesi (Kendari) JS Meeting with PHO and stake holder of Southeas Su-
lawesi 1
18 – 20
Manado (North Sulawes DH Meeting with PHO and stake holders 1
23 – 24 Denpasar (Bali) JD, DH Visit Puskesmas model and Pustu 2
October
4 – 6 Pekanbaru (Riau) JS, NN Riau Province Visit to find current conditions, status plan and progress of Health sector Reform in the area. 2
7 – 8 Batam JS, NN Kepulauan Riau Province Visit to find current condition of the area. 2
25 – 27
Puncak (Jawa Barat)
JS, NN, DH Seminar on OR program and HSR Implementation 4
November
2 – 3 Pekanbaru DK, NN Riau Province Visit 2
9 – 10 Banda Aceh NN Banda Aceh Province Visit 1
16 – 19
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN Visit South East Sulawesi 1
21 – 24 Denpasar (Bali) JS, NN,
DK TA meeting on IR revision 3
27 – 30
Palu (Central Su-lawesi) NN Visit Central Sulawesi 1
December
1 – 4 Pekanbaru (Riau) NN Attend seminar on HSR implementation, develop of OR proposal and Unit cost for Puskesmas 1
9 – 10 Banda Aceh NN Banda Aceh Province Visit 1
16 – 17
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN Field Visit in Puskesmas and PHO 1
27 – 29
Palu (Central Su-lawesi) NN Visit Central Sulawesi 1
Total 2004: 27
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 55
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Table 4 - Field Visits by TA Team Members, 2005
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy
Plan-ning
ADB mission
February
13 – 17 Banda Aceh RT Visit Banda Aceh Tsunami disaster 1
March
13 – 16 Pekanbaru (Riau) RT,
NN Field Visit 2
25 – 27 Jogyakarta RT Meeting at UGM 1
April
10 – 12
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari)
RT, NN
Field Visit to Kendari and Kolaka District 2
13 – 16
Manado (North Sulawesi)
RT, NN
Field Visit to Manado and Bitung City 2
27 – 29 Denpasar (Bali) JD, JS
Field Visit to with P. Fedon (ADB) to Tabanan District Hospital, Indera Hospital, Puskesmas Den-pasar Barat 3, Puskesmas Mengui
3
26 – 29
Banda Aceh (NAD)
RT, NN Field Visit 2
May
18 – 22 Denpasar (Bali) RT, JS Field Visit to Tabanan District,
Klungkung, Bangli 2
26 – 28 Bengkulu RT,
NN Field Visit to Bengkulu Selatan, Suka Makmur District, and Beng-kulu City
2
June
2 – 4 Cisarua (West Java) All Workshop Preparation to Increase
Health Effort DHS (ADB)
11 – 12
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN Field visit with Karima Saleh
22 – 24
Cisarua (West Java) All Lokakarya Evaluasi pelaksanaan
HSR
4 4 1
July
25 – 27
Cipayung (West Java) All Workshop Finalizing Proposal for
Loan Extension 4
August
1 – 5 Palu (Central Sulawesi) All Field Visit with EPOS (M. Niech-
zial) 4
22 – 25
Palu (Central Sulawesi)
RT, NN Field Visit To Palu 2
September
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 56
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy
Plan-ning
ADB mission
4 – 6 Bandung (West Java)
RT, NN, AG, JS
Workshop on Socialization, Pres-entation material for Socialization, Prepare time schedule for visit
4
8 -10 Palu (Central Sulawesi)
RT, NN 2
8 -9 Manado (North Sulawesi)
AG, JS 2
12 – 14
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari)
RT, NN 2
13 – 14 Pekanbaru (Riau) AG,
JS 2
18 – 19 Bengkulu
RT, NN, AG
3
21 – 23 Denpasar (Bali) NN,
JS 2
22 – 23
Banda Aceh (NAD)
RT, AG
Field Visit (Socialization Grand Design to Provinces)
2
24 – 26 Sanur (Bali) All TA strategic Retreat to review TOR 4
29 – 30
Cisarua (West Java)
RT, NN, AG
Grand Design Finalization Plan-ning 2006 3
October
1 Cisarua (West Java) All Review Meeting plan 2006 by
provinces 4
17 – 19
Cisarua (West Java) All Workshop sharing experiences
DHS-1 4
November
23 – 25
Palu (Central Sulawesi) NN Seminar on exit strategy 1
15 – 16
Manado (North Sulawesi) AG Analysis health North Sulawesi
(Province & District) 1
29 – 30
Bengkulu (Beng-kulu) NN Workshop on DTPS 1
December
2 – 3 Cisarua (West Java) All Workshop on project achievement
review & planning for year 2006 4
7 – 10 Manado (North Sulawesi), Palu (Central Sulawesi)
AG Advocacy to Province DHS-1 2
8 – 9 West Sulawesi (Mamuju) NN
Visit West Sulawesi for DHS2, district Polewali and District Ma-jene
1
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 57
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy
Plan-ning
ADB mission
9 – 11 Palu (Central Sulawesi)
RT, AG Advocacy to Province DHS-1 2
11 – 12
Bengkulu (Beng-kulu) NN District Training for Health Plan-
ning 1
17 Makassar (Ujung Pandang) NN
Meeting Advocation & Socialization of Project DHS-2 in South Su-lawesi
2
18 – 19 Bali (Denpasar) AG Advocacy 1
20 – 21
Banda Aceh (NAD) AG TA for NAD strategic planning 1
TOTAL 2005: 87 13 27 36 11
Table 5 - Field Visits by TA Team Members, 2006
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy Planning ADB
mission
January
19 – 20
Riau (Pekan Baru) RT Strategic planning to district 1
21 – 23
Kepulauan Riau (Batam) RT Strategic planning to district 1
23 – 24
Banda Aceh (NAD) AG TA for strategic planning review
(NAD) 1
22 – 24
Kendari (South-east Sulawesi) NN Workshop on District proposals 1
26 – 28
Cisarua (West Java) All District strategic plan evaluation 4
February
Manado (North Sulawesi) NN Field Visit to Bolaang Man-
gando District,
8 – 10 Gorontalo (Goron-talo) RT
Visit PHO & DHO, meeting Bappeda (Regional Develop-ment Board) & Governor of Gorontalo
2
18 – 22
Banda Aceh (NAD) NN
Visit provincial hospital, PHO, and health centres, pustu & polindes; meeting with ADB Mission (K. Saleh);
2
March
16 – 18
Riau (Pekan Baru)
NN JS
Workshop on Strategic plan-ning, Riau 2
20 – 22
Cisarua (West Java) All Evaluation of strategic plan 4
27 – 29
Bengkulu (Beng-kulu) NN Workshop on strategic plan-
ning, Bengkulu 1
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 58
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy Planning ADB
mission
April
12 – 14
Cisarua, West Java
RT, AG, NN, JS
HSR workshop, report presen-tation on HSR Guideline DHS-1 4
25 – 28 Bali (Denpasar) RT Socialization 1
May
1 Bali (Buleleng District) JS, AG District plans review 2
08 – 11
South Sulawesi (Makassar) NN Review Strategic Planning 1
10 – 11 Aceh AG Assisting strategic planning 1
15 – 16
Central Sulawesi (Palu) AG Advocacy 1
16 Riau (Pekanbaru) NN Strat.plan workshop 1
17 – 19
Kepri (Tanjung Pinang)
RT, NN Strat.plan workshop 2
29 – 31
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari)
RT, NN Strat.plan workshop 2
June
05 – 08
West Java (Bandung)
RT, NN, AG
National meeting on decentrali-zation 3
19 South Sulawesi (Makassar)
NN, RT, RW
Field visit ADB mission & DHS-2 3
15 – 17
West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) All
Meeting coordination develop-ment health plan 2007 for DHS-2
5
23 – 24 West Sulawesi NN Filed visit to Polewali and Ma-
jene 1
23 – 24
North Sulawesi (Manado, To-mohon)
RT Socialization data Susenas maternal & neonatal death rate 1
July
03 – 05 Bali (Denpasar) JS WHO meeting, edit issue paper,
& review Bali districts plan 1
04 – 05
Bengkulu (Beng-kulu)
AG, NN
MNCH planning seminar, advo-cacy & strategic planning 2
06 – 08
West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) All
Discussion DHS-2 future pro-grams, training technical review team NTB-NTT with ADB mis-sion (K. Saleh)
3
11 – 13 Riau (Pekanbaru) RT,
NN Strategic plan province DHS-1 2
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 59
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy Planning ADB
mission
11 – 15 Bali (Denpasar) JS Review Bali strategic Plan 1
21 – 24
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN Meeting ES Southeast Su-
lawesi & Head of Dinkes 1
26 – 28
Kepulauan Riau (Natuna)
RT, RW Final review strategic plan 2
26 – 28
South Sulawesi (Makassar) NN Review strategic plan South-
east & Central Sulawesi 1
21 – 24
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN
Collect material strategic plan all districts & HSR Kolaka dis-trict
2
August
02 – 04
West Java (Cisa-rua) All
Planning workshop DHS-1 with all provinces, technical review 2007
4
08 – 09
South Sulawesi (Makassar) NN Seminar at Wahidin Hospital 1
10 West Java (Cisa-rua) All 3 yrs planning 4
15 – 16
West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) RT Evaluation project DHS-2 1
22 – 25
West Java (Cisa-rua) AG Revise IHPB module 2
23 South Sulawesi (Makassar) NN Meeting with DHS-2 staff 1
22 – 26
Central Sulawesi (Palu)
RT, RW
Visit Dinkes Poso District & puskesmas, visit puskesmas Ampana Tete
2
29 Bali (Denpasar) AG Advocacy 1
30.-1.9. Jogjakarta (DIY)
RT, AG, NN, RW
Annual Opr. Budget DHS-2, Exit Strategy Workshop 4
September
09 – 14
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN Advocacy at Konawe District,
Kendari City, & Kolaka District 3
10 – 12
Bali (Nusa Penida)
RT, RW
Evaluation Poned & Ponek at Nusa Penida District 2
13 – 15 Bali (Denpasar)
RT, AG, RW
Workshop monitoring & evalua-tion DHS-1, DIP (part of Annual Opr. Budget) DHS-2
3
17 – 21
North Sumatera (Medan)
NN, RW Training DTPS for NAD 2
18 – 19
East Java (Sura-baya) RT Workshop Synchronizing DHS-
2 Activities 1
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 60
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy Planning ADB
mission
18 – 19
Southeast Su-lawesi (Kendari) AG Advocacy MNCH 1
20 – 22
East Java (Sura-baya)
RT, NN
Workshop Synchronizing DHS-2 Activities 2
21 - 22
South Sumatera (Palembang)
RM, RW Planning workshop DHS-2 1
21 – 22 Kepulauan Riau AG Strategic planning & advocacy 1
October
2 – 4 South East Su-lawesi (Kendari) RW Socialization DTPS 1
5 – 6 West Java (Bandung)
RW, NN, RT
BKKBN West Regional Work-shop on Family Planning 3
9 – 11 North Sulawesi (Manado)
RT, NN, RW, AG
Workshop on exit strategy DHS1 4
12 South Kalimantan (Banjarmasin) AG DHS2 Planning Meeting 1
12 – 13
West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram)
NN, RT
BKKBN East Regional Work-shop on Family Planning 2
12 – 14
South Sumatera (Palembang) RW Strategic Planning 1
18 – 19
West Java (Bandung)
RW, RT, AG
Meeting MNCH advocacy 3
30 – 1.11.
South Sulawesi (Makassar) NN DHS2 District Officer Training 1
November
6 – 7 West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) RT 1
7 – 8 West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) RW
MNCH Assessment at remote area
1
7 – 9 West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) NN Strategic planning to district 1
8 – 10 North Nusa Tenggara (Ku-pang)
RT, AG
Workshop arrange proposal & Master Plan 2007-2010 Project DHS2
2
9 – 12 Bengkulu (Beng-kulu) RW Training for based line study 1
13 South Sulawesi (Selayar)
NN, RT
Workshop on DHS2 District Planning 2
14 South Sulawesi (Selayar) NN Visit Health Center and Sub
Health Center
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 61
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervision Advo-cacy Planning ADB
mission
15 South Sulawesi (Pare-pare)
NN, RT
Workshop on preparation dis-trict health system 2
17 – 18
Central Sulawesi (Palu) NN Research proposal of DHS1
local program 1
19 – 20
South East Su-lawesi (Kendari)
NN, RW, RT
Advocacy Grand Design & Socialization DTPS in South Konawe District
3
21 – 22
South East Su-lawesi (Raha)
NN, RW, RT
Advocacy Grand Design & Socialization DTPS in Muna District
3
23 – 24
South East Su-lawesi (Bau-bau)
NN, RW, RT
Advocacy Grand Design & Socialization DTPS in Bau-bau City
3
28 – 29
South Sulawesi (Ujung Pandang) RT Visit to Bappeda (Local Plan-
ning & Development Agency) 1
27 – 30
Kepulauan Riau (Batam)
NN RW
Workshop on DTPS action plan 3
30 – 1.12.
Banjarmasin (South Kaliman-tan)
RT Workshop arrange proposal & master plan 2007-2010 project DHS2
1
December
1 West Java (Bo-gor) AG MNCH advocacy DHS1 1
5 – 7 Kepulauan Riau (Batam) AG Integrated Health Planning and
Budgeting (IHPB) Training 1
8 – 9 West Java (Bandung)
RW, RT, NN
Workshop on Lesson Learned & Shared Experience 3
11 – 13
West Java (Bo-gor)
AG, RT HSR TOT 1
13 – 14
West Java (Bo-gor) NN Meeting finalization master plan
DHS2 1
19 East Java (Sura-baya) RW MNCH Guideline clinics 1
20 West Java (Bo-gor) RT Meeting TRT work plan DHS2 1
18 – 20 Bali (Denpasar) NN WHO SEARO Meeting for ADB 1
20 - 23
Kepulauan Riau (Tanjung Pinang) RW Socialization for District Team
Problem Solving (DTPS) 1
26 – 27
South Sulawesi (Jeneponto) NN Visit for advocacy DHS2 1
Total 2006:151 18 36 89 8
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 62
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Table 5 - Field Visits by TA Team Members, 2007
When Province Who Purpose Supervi-sion
Advo-cacy Planning
January
7 – 8 Central Kaliman-tan (Palangkaraya)
RT, NN, RW
Meet with Head Health Office, Field Visit Poned & Ponek District Project DHS2
2
9 – 11 Central Kaliman-tan (Kasongan District)
RT, NN Visit Kasongan District & Tumbang Habangoi Village 2
15 – 16 East Java (Sura-baya) RW Preparation for workshop comple-
tion of MNCH guideline 1
DHS1 workshop Monev Analysis RT, NN
DHS1 planning activities 2007 2
16 – 21 Bali (Denpasar)
All TA Meeting for book writing
26 – 27 East Java (Sura-baya) RW Preparation workshop for IPHB
Improvement 1
February
8 Bali (Denpasar) RT Socialization DHS-1 1
Visit Riau Province
Visit Siak District 13 – 15 Riau (Pekanbaru) RT, NN, RW
Partnership TBA with midwives
3
21 – 24 South East Su-lawesi (Kendari) RT, NN
Visit villages with Bakesra (com-munity health hall) in Kolaka Dis-trict
2
25 – 27 West Nusa Teng-gara (Mataram) RT, AG
Workshop IHPB improvement of the district health system in East Nusa Tenggara & West Nusa Tenggara
2
26 – 27 South Sulawesi (Ujung Pandang)
RW, NN
Workshop monev management DHS 2
March
12 – 15 Central Sulawesi (Palu) RT, NN Work on Palu Total Quality Man-
agement (TQM )chapter 2
21 – 22 Bali (Denpasar) RT, AG Socialization DHS1 & visit to Jim-brana District 2
27 – 28 West Java (Bogor) All Compiling work plan TRT DHS1 4
28 – 29 South East Su-lawesi (Kendari) NN Socialization DHS1 1
April
2 – 4 Bandung (Jawa Barat) RT, NN Workshop DHS2 on Program Co-
ordination 2
2 – 6 North Sumatera (Medan)
RW, AG Workshop DTPS 1
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 63
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervi-sion
Advo-cacy Planning
10 Banda Aceh (NAD) NN Socialization DHS1
17 Bogor (West Java) RT, NN, RW
Present at workshop on advocacy for mother & child with HSP (USAID)
3
18 – 21 Ujung Pandang (South Sulawesi) RT, NN Visit Mamuju District and working
on master plan West Sulawesi 2
24 – 26 Bandung (West Java)
RT, NN, AG
Workshop Analysis monev & per-siapan project completion report (PCR) & Benefit Monitoring Evaluation (BME) & Field visit SUbang District
3
May
8 – 11 Batam (Kepri) RT, AG Workshop exit strategy DHS1 2
22 – 24 Surabaya (East Java)
NN, AG
Meeting Work Plan Years Project DHS1 2
June
4 – 8 Palu (Central Su-lawesi) RT, NN
Participate in DTPS for maternal health, develop annual MNCH work-plan
2
7 - 10 Bandung (West Java)
RT, NN, AG
Demand Creation Technical sup-port for DHS-1, and prepartion for mission
3
19 – 20 Bengkulu (Beng-kulu) RT, NN DTPS, DHS impact survey, 3
July
3 – 6 Polewali Mandar (West Sulawesi) RT, NN Visit Polewali District : two Pusk-
esmas at two Subdistricts 3
08 – 09 Gorontalo (Goron-talo) RT, NN Field visit Bone Bolango district &
Boalemo district
12 – 13 Kendari (South East Sulawesi) NN Visit Kolaka District
16 – 18 Medan (North Sumatera) AG Field visit on District & infrastruc-
ture with all heads of Kepri district
17 – 20 Pekanbaru (Riau) RT, NN Strategic Plan and Proposal De-velopment 2
27– 28 Bitung City (North Sulawesi) RT, NN Visit Bitung city of North Sulawesi
August
5 – 11 Bali (Denpasar) RT, NN, AG
International Health Sector Reform Meeting 3
20 Sekayu (South Sumatera) RT, NN Visit Banyuasin and Musi Banyua-
sin District
21 – 24 Palembang (South Sumatera) RT, NN Visit DHS-2 program at Palem-
bang City 3
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 64
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Supervi-sion
Advo-cacy Planning
30 Bengkulu (Beng-kulu) AG MNCH Advocacy
September
3 – 4 Kota Baru (South Kalimantan) All Visit 2 puskesmas in Kota Baru
District and meeting with Bupati
5 Kota Baru (South Kalimantan) RT, NN
Visit pustu (assisted puskesmas) in isolated area (Tanjung Lalah District in Lontar Island)
7 – 9 Gorontalo (Goron-talo) NN Visit Boalemo District
27 Mataram (West Nusa Tenggara) RT, NN Visit Desa Siaga in West Lombok
28 Karang Anyar (Central Java)
RT, NN, AG
Visit Desa Siaga in Karang Anyar
October
8 Makassar, South Sulawesi NN Visit DHS 2 South Sulawesi Prov. 1
November
14 – 16 Denpasar, Bali RT Field Vsit to Polindes, Pskesmas, Desa Siaga at Karang Asam Distr. 2
19 - 20 Central Sulawesi NN Exit Strategy Workshop at Parigi District & Demand Creation work-shop at Palu City
1 1
22 - 23 Pangkal Pinang, Bangka Belitung RT,NN Workshop on DHS 2 program 2
December
3 – 5 Bengkulu NN Workshop on Data validation 1
10 Jeneponto, S.Sulawesi NN Sosialization DHS proeject
application 1
12 - 13 Makassar, S.Sulawesi RT Provincial DHS 2 Meeting 1
16 – 18 Kendari, South East Sulawesi NN Workshop on policy dialogue Ko-
laka Dstrict 1
16 - 17 Palu, Central Su-lawesi AG HSR Advocacy 1
Total 2007 80 12 9 59
Table 5 - Field Visits by TA Team Members, 2008
When Province Who Purpose Super-vision
Advo-cacy
Plan-ning
January
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 65
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Who Purpose Super-vision
Advo-cacy
Plan-ning
11 - 13 South-East Su-lawesi All Feld visit Bau-Bau District Advo-
cacy Grand Design MNCH 4
18 - 20 Kendari, South-East Sulawesi NN Workshop Grand Design MNCH
Kolaka Utara District 1
26 - 30 Bengkulu RT,NN Develop plan for in-service training 1
April
9 - 11 Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan All Field visit Kotabaru District, OR
undertaken on barriers to care 4
14 - 17 Kupang, NTT RT,AG Field visit to NTT to review the District Health Account Proposal, in coordination with AusAID
2
June
19 - 22 Manado, North Sulawesi All
Field visit with K. Saleh and Boni (Sitaro District & Meet with Bupati and BAPPEDA)
July
25 Bandung, West Java NN Socialization DHS 2 at National
Occupational Health meeting. 1
August
13 – 14 Gorontalo RT,NN Field visit to Bualemo and Bone Bolango Districts 2
19 – 20 Banjarmasin (South Kaliman-tan)
AG Supervision Project DHS-2 1
20 - 21 Palu, Central Su-lawesi RT,NN,
Field visit with Mission (K.Saleh & S. Latief), DHS-2 Synchronization Meeting West Sulawesi
4
22 - 24 Denpasar, Bali RT,AG Field visit with Mission (K.Saleh & S. Latief) to Jimbarana District 4
Total 2008: 23 8 6 9
7.3 Publications and Presentations
7.3.1 Technical Documents Produced
No. Name of Document
October 2004
Criteria for Operations Research
Information for Applicants to Research Grants and simplified Application Form
List of Operation Research Topics
April 2005
Revised MOU for DHS 1
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 66
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
No. Name of Document
Reviewed Plan of Action for TA 3579-INO DHS-ADB Project (Presentation)
Basic Concepts of Operation Research
GAP Analysis (review of program outcomes as compared to the goals of the log frame,) undertaken at the re-quest of the director of planning, to the director of Social Services for SE Asia – 1 1st draft
Enhancing the impact of Health Sector Reform
May 2005
Second revision of the GAP analysis based on comments and review by MOH, and ADB
ADB Health Sector Reform Project - 1st Progress report & Annual Work plan 2005
Policy Paper: ADB Health Sector Reform
June 2005
Grand Design for MNCH
Developing TOR of expanding MNCH services in the DHS-1 program
July 2005
Policy Paper: HSR for the Poor
Proposal for DHS 1 Project extension
Short PPTA MNCH
MNCH Proposal
August 2005
TOR for Socialization & Advocacy of Grand Design
District utilization of trained health personnel for delivery
Socialization Plan
Utilization of private & public health services (Presentation)
Socialization, Grand Design in Indonesian
Revised Project Logical FrameworkDHS-1 to focus on MNCH
September 2005
MNCH TOR
TOR, Health Information Management System
October 2005
Results of developing a model for predicting Maternal Mortality Risk
Concept paper: “Why has Bali been more successful than others in improving health status: a study in positive deviance”
Concept paper: “Piloting a Unifying Strategy for Clinical Care”
Progress Report: Bali Integrated Care
Profile DHS-1 Provinces (Power-point)
Draft: articles for DHS-1 Bulletin Newsletter Invitation
November 2005
TOR: Study Tour to Philippines for MNCH Focus (edit of Bali Province Document)
Overview packet (for DHS socialization of MNCH)
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 67
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
No. Name of Document
Reflection: What to do about the “Demand Side” of the DHS project
Mortality rates by district
District Team Problem Solving (DTPS) Basic concept of DTPS
Maternal mortality risk distribution within Indonesia
Grand Design Strategy (English & Bahasa Indonesia)
Develop new RRP for DHS-1 as requested by project team leader ADBf 27 August 2004
December 2005
Initial Aceh tsunami health damage assessment (TOR)
Birthing by District (Power-point)
Total Quality Management of health service delivery Sulteng (Power-point)
Exit policy DHS-2
Potential Focal Points for Community Side Interventions
Existing community health system
Edit: Implementation Schedule 2006-2008, DHS-1, by province & by project component
Edit: Section V. Project Benefits, Impacts & Risks
Implementation Schedule December 2005
Revision MNCH Proposal based on district and provincial input
Power-point presentation: Recommended new Logical Framework for DHS-1
DHS-1 amendment proposal
Presentation to USAID presentation of DHS-1 new Grand Strategy
Power-point presentation on MNCH for Bali Province district: “Demand Side”
Revision and edits: TA 3579 annual Work Plan
Preparing for “Meeting of the minds” to add more HSR Focus to DHS-2
Development of first description of Best Practice within DHS-1
January 2006
Edit: Article on Health Sector Reform written by Ibu ist published in DHS-1 bullentini
The map of health services in the Riau archipelago)
Edit: Appendix 4. Economic Analysis (for DHS-1 extension “Short RRP”)
DHS-2 baseline survey (proposal for baseline survey)
Format for communicating evaluation of 2006-2008 strategic plans to ADB
Revisi renstra MENKES (Rencana Strategis = Strategic Plan of MoH) English
Model predicting MMR by district draft 7
DHS-1 Amendment proposal rev4
Format evaluasi renstra 2006-2008
Cost effectiveness of MNCH investment
February 2006
Master Plan for DHS-1 after socialization of Grand Design, and Planning excercise
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 68
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
No. Name of Document
Draft summary rmaster plan introduction rev
DHS-1 Renstra (Rencana Strategis = Strategic Plan) 2006-2008 rev 2
Mini RRP DHS-1
DHS-1 Strategic Planning 2006-2008
Short RRP DHS-1 revision 7
Result of Strategic Planning Evaluation 2006-2008 (English)
Recommendation for activities priority and fund source map 2006-2008
Fourth evaluation of DHS-1 strategic plan (post revision by the districts)
Edit: DHS-1 power-point presentation for proposal to extend DHS-1 to focus on MNCH
Utilization DHS Prov 2000 & 2004
DHS-2 cost tabs by district
Comments on strategic planning process
March 2006
Request for Proposal Baseline Assessment DHS-2
DHS-2 indicator table (excel table created from Susenas)
Proposal for DHS-1 project extension rev
Suggestion for DHS-1 Lessons Learned Exercise
DHS-1 Exit Strategy suggestions
DHS-2 Baseline survey revision of RFP
Outline for evaluation & monitoring of DHS-2 Project
Strategic planning evaluation of DHS-2
Kepulauan Riau strategic planning, NAD strategic planning, Bengkulu strategic planning, Riau strategic planning, Central Sulawesi strategic planning, Southeast Sulawesi strategic planning, North Sulawesi strategic planning
Develop Checklists for strategic planning
Powerpoint presentation: monitoring (criteria for strategic planning)
District Team Problem Solving (DTPS) a guide line to develop DTPS team at the province and district
Proposal MNCH 2006-2008 Final (North Sulawesi)
Surveillance of MNCH
April 2006
2 Discussing HSR (Power-point)
4 MCH Workshop material Power-point)
5 Outline documentation HSR
May 2006
6 TOR for assessment of maternal health indicators
June 2006
7 TOR for Epidemiologic surveillance training
8 Training material socialization & advocacy of MNCH(Excel)
9 Policy Paper: Issues for improving health services performance
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 69
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
No. Name of Document
11 Proposal for TA extension rev 2
12 INO DHS-2 June’06 review mission AM
July 2006
Strategic Planning DHS-1
Public Health Surveillance
HSR Issues paper developed by TA
Matrix strategic planning (Excel)
Numbers of manpower health (by function and location - Excel)
Decentralization of HRD / Human resources for health in INA-issues paper
Health information & epidemiologic surveillance (issue paper) (N3)
HSR issues paper rev 5
August 2006
Revision of DHS-1 performance indicators with most recent Susenas Data
Review of operational research studies undertaken (Power-point)
Data on availability of health staff for DHS1 area
Degree program (a gude line for selecting fellowship participants)
Final draft Post Grand Design RRP for DHS-1
Format training & fellowship Karima (Excel)
Issue Paper: Health manpower
Income distribution of populations and its relationship to maternal health access
Development of various TOR for different types of consultants proposed for DHS-1 (Word)
Policy Paper: The development of in-service Training (Excel)
Model predicting MMR by district draft 7 (Excel)
TOR for study tour for DHS-1 (Word)
DHS-2 Cost tabs South Sulawesi (Excel)
Growth faltering & income (Power-point)
Distribution of village size by province (Power-.point)
Susenas curve & graph 1 English-updated (Excel)
The trip to Togian District (Power-point)
Guidelines for assuring training programs
Strategic planning manpower health (Excel)
September 2006
Conceptual framework for DTPS (Power-point)
Guidelines for DTPS (District Team Problem Solving)
HSR issues paper developed by TA 8 Rev (Word)
October 2006
Presentation Description Project DHS-2 in BKKBN Meeting
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 70
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
No. Name of Document
Millennium Development Goals rev4
Indicator DHS-2
November 2006
Natuna District: What Can We Learn?
Training DTPS
December 2006
Providing Health Service for Poor Community
New Guidelines
January 2007
Analysis Evaluation of DHS-1
HSR Guidelines December 2006
Recapitulation Master Plan & Annual Plan DHS-2
February 2007
Health Human Resources development for DHS project
Matrix Summary HSR Book
Summary of Fellowship for Year 2001-2004 DHS-1
Training Programs, management and technical training program in DHS 2
Total Health Manpower
Decentralization Health Human Resources Development
Design Advocacy Southeast Sulawesi
Surveillance HMIS
Evaluation Strategic Planning
March 2007
Outline Bakesra (Balai Kesehatan Rakyat) HSR model for health services at remove village in South East Su-lawesi
Partnership TBA with Midwife in Siak District, Riau Province
HSR Case Studies February 2007
July –August 2008
Evaluation of impact of Desa Siaga, a Guideline
Desa Siaga Model, a Guideline
Surveillance model for Desa Siaga
Training Desa Siaga Facilitators
Cost Tables for DHS-2 2009-2010
Barriers to Health Care in Indonesia
7.3.2 Meetings attended
When Province Purpose
2004
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 71
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
02.09. Jakarta (DKI) Draft Review Circulated by Central Technical Committee
10.09. Jakarta (DKI) Recommendations with ADB from Draft Review
20.09. Jakarta (DKI) Submitting Inception Report to MoH
22 – 25.11. Denpasar (Bali) Finalizing Revised Inception Report , Planning the 1st Six-Month Report, and Preparing Plans for the Next 6 Months
2005
07.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting OR Guidelines
17.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting at DHS-1 for ADB Mission
18 – 19.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting at DHS-1 with ADB Mission
20.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with Province executives
21.04. Jakarta (DKI) Wrap-up Meeting with ADB Mission
22 – 23.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with ADB Mission at IRM
25.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting ADB Mission with MOH
11.05. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting GAP Analysis Presentation
12.05. Jakarta (DKI) Seminar on UI and GAMA finding
07 – 9.06. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) National Seminar on Decentralization
13.06. Jakarta (DKI) Mission Meeting with DHS-2 Staff
02– 4.06. Cisarua (West Java) Workshop Preparation to Increase Health Effort DHS (ADB)
22 – 24.06. Cisarua (West Java) Workshop HSR Implementation Evaluation
04. 07. Jakarta (DKI) TA Meeting with Executive Secretary
11.07. Jakarta (DKI) Presentation, project extension proposal
25.07. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting Ext. Proposal at Bappenas
26 – 27.07. Cipayung (West Java) Workshop Finalizing Proposal for Loan Extension
09.08. Jakarta (DKI) Seminar with UGM and UI Presentation
26.08. Jakarta (DKI) Ta Meeting with Executive Secretary
04 – 06.09. Bandung (West Java) Workshop to prepare Socialization, Presentation material for Socialization, Prepare time schedule for visit
24 – 26.09. Denpasar (Bali) Meeting TOR for strategic Retreat
01.10. Cisarua (West Java) Meeting review plan for 2006 by provinces
09.10. Jakarta (DKI) TA Consulting Meeting
17 – 19.10. Cisarua (West Java) Workshop sharing experiences DHS-1
21 – 22.10. Jakarta (DKI) TA Consulting Meeting
14.11. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with Secretary Executive DHS-1
15.11. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting Team TA
20 - 22.11. Jakarta (DKI) Seminar of National Action Call for Increasing Public Health Degree
28 – 29.11. Jakarta (DKI) Mission Briefing meeting.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 72
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
02 – 3.12. Cisarua (West Java) Workshop on project achievement review & planning for year 2006
04 – 7.12. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with ADB Mission Team & Review DHS-2 Plan of Action
09.12. Jakarta (DKI) Wrap-up meeting project DHS-1, 2 & ETESP
14 – 15.12. Jakarta (DKI) Workshop review & Development Japan Fund for poverty reduction
17.12. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Meeting Advocation & Socialization of Project DHS-2 in South Sulawesi
22.12. Jakarta (DKI) Presentation Health Situation Analysis at DHS-2 Region
2006
05.01. Jakarta (DKI) TA Meeting
06.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting evaluation & setting work plan of center technical committee year 2006
11.01. Jakarta (DKI) TA and DHS1&2 Executives meeting
12.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting preparation for strategic planning evaluation 2006 – 2008
16 – 17.01. Jakarta (DKI) Workshop on proposal Review (DHS-1)
25.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with BKKBN
26 – 28.01. Cisarua (West Java) Meeting district strategic planning evaluation
01.02. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with GTZ/ADB
14-17.02. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting TA, ADB Mission and DHS-1 & DHS-2 staffs & with head of Plan-ning Bureau of MOH
23.02. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting DHS-1 extension program present at the Bappenas (National Plan-ning Board)
03.03. Jakarta (DKI) Invitation of workshop for Ausaid women & child health programming mis-sion to East Nusa Tenggara
06.03. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with EPOS
07.03. Jakarta (DKI) TA meeting for semester report
10.03. Jakarta (DKI) TA Meeting with Director of DHS 2
17.03. Jakarta (DKI) Preparation meeting for evaluation result & finishing project fund calculation
20 – 22.03. Cisarua (West Java) Strategic planning evaluation meeting
04 – 07.04. Jakarta (DKI) - OR guideline finalization - Meeting with DHS-1, preparing OR presentation
12 – 14.04. Cisarua (West Java) HSR workshop, report presentation on HSR Guideline DHS-1
17 – 19.04. Jakarta (DKI) Revise HSR guideline
24 – 26.04. Jakarta (DKI) Finalize OR guideline
02 – 03.05. Jakarta (DKI) Coordination meeting baseline survey DHS-2
08 – 11.05. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Review Strategic Planning Riau & Kepri
16.05. Pekanbaru (Riau) Strat.plan workshop
16 – 19.05. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting stakeholders program of child health to develop strat.plan 2007
17 – 19.05. Tanjung Pinang (Bangka Belitung) Strat.plan workshop
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 73
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
22.05. Jakarta (DKI) TOR baseline survey DHS-2
22 – 24.05. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting stakeholders program of maternal health to develop strat.plan 2007
26.05. Jakarta (DKI) Review analysis MNCH program EBM
29 – 31.05. Kendari (Southeast Sulawesi) Strat.plan workshop
05 – 08.06. Bandung (West Java) National meeting on decentralization
09 – 14.06. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting ADB mission with DHS-2 staff
15 – 17.06. Mataram (West Nusa Tenggara) Meeting coordination development health plan 2007 for DHS-2
21 – 22.06. Jakarta (DKI) ADB mission with MOH & wrap up meeting with Bappenas
27 – 30.06. Jakarta (DKI) Review issue paper, meeting ES DHS-2, presentation DHS-2 action plan 2006/07
01 – 03.07. Jakarta (DKI) Review strat.plan Bengkulu Province
03 – 05.07. Jakarta (DKI) Design baseline Bengkulu Province, & finalize issue paper
03 – 05.07. Bali (Denpasar) WHO meeting, edit issue paper, & review Bali districts plan
04 – 05.07. Bengkulu (Bengkulu) MNCH planning seminar, advocacy & strategic planning
06 – 08.07. Mataram (West Nusa Tenggara) Discussion DHS-2 future programs, training technical review team NTB-NTT
14.07. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting DHS-2 with Bappenas
17 – 19.07. Jakarta (DKI) DHS-1: Meeting & presentation DHS-1 extension, develop guideline for EMOC
21 – 24.07. Kendari (Southeast Sulawesi) Meeting ES Southeast Sulawesi & Head of Dinkes
01.08. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with ADB mission
02 – 04.08. Cisarua (West Java) Planning worskhop DHS-1 with all provinces, review centre technical 2007
05 – 07.08. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with ADB mission (aide memoire)
08 – 09.08. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Seminar at Wahidin Hospital
10.08. Cisarua (West Java) 3 yrs planning
22 – 25.08. Cisarua (West Java) Revise IHPB module
23.08. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Meeting with DHS-2 staffs
22 – 26.08. Palu (Central Sulawesi) Workshop Acceleration of Reducing Maternal Mortality Rate in Tojo Unauna District
24 – 26.08. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Workshop on district work plan
28.08. Jakarta (DKI) Report advocacy Bali
29.08. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with Director of Decentralize Unit
30.08. – 01.09. Jogjakarta (DIY ) Annual Opr. Budget DHS-2, Exit Strategy Workshop
13 – 15.09. Bali (Denpasar) Workshop monitoring & evaluation DHS-1, DIP (part of Annual Opr. Budget) DHS-2
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 74
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
16 – 17.09. Jakarta (DKI) Report advocacy
18 – 19.09. Surabaya (East Java) Workshop Synchronizing DHS-2 Activities
20 – 22.09. Surabaya (East Java) Workshop Synchronizing DHS-2 Activities
25 - 26.09. Jakarta (DKI) Policy dialog
27 – 29.09. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting DHS-1 for Exit Strategy Workshop, developing TOR for workshop in Manado
5 – 6.10. Bandung (West Java) BKKBN West Regional Workshop on Family Planning
06.10. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with DHS1 Executive Secretary
09 – 11.10. Manado (North Su-lawesi) Workshop on exit strategy DHS1
12.10. Banjarmasin (South Kalimantan) DHS2 Planning Meeting
12 – 13.10. Mataram (West Nusa Tenggara) BKKBN East Regional Workshop on Family Planning
12 – 14.10. Palembang (South Sumatera) Strategic Planning
18 – 19.10. Bandung (West Java) Meeting MNCH advocacy
30.10. – 01.11.
Makassar (South Su-lawesi) DHS2 District Officer Training
06.11. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with DHS1 Executive Secretary
07 – 09 .11. Mataram (West Nusa Tenggara) Workshop on Master Plan DHS2
08 – 10.11. Kupang (North Nusa Tenggara) Workshop arrange proposal & Master Plan 2007-2010 Project DHS2
09 – 12.11. Bengkulu (Bengkulu) Training for based line study
13.11. Selayar (South Su-lawesi) Workshop on DHS2 District Planning
15.11. Pare-pare (South Su-lawesi) Workshop on preparation district health system
19 – 20.11. Kendari (South East Sulawesi) Advocacy Grand Design & Socialization DTPS in South Konawe District
21 – 22.11. Raha (South East Su-lawesi) Advocacy Grand Design & Socialization DTPS in Muna District
23 – 24.11. Bau-bau (South East Sulawesi) Advocacy Grand Design & Socialization DTPS in Bau-bau City
23 – 24.11. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting TOR MNCH with ES DHS1
27 – 30.11. Batam (Kepulauan Riau) Workshop on DTPS action plan
27 – 30.11. Bogor (West Java) P2KT Training
28 – 29.11. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Workshop arrange & master plan 2007-2010 project DHS2
30.11. – 01.12.
Banjarmasin (South Kalimantan) Workshop arrange proposal & master plan 2007-2010 project DHS2
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 75
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
01.12. Bogor (West Java) MNCH advocacy DHS1
04 – 07.12. Jakarta (DKI) ADB Mission
05 – 07.12. Batam (Kepulauan Riau) P2KT Training
08 – 09.12. Bandung (West Java) Workshop on Lesson Learned & Shared Experience
11 – 13.12. Bogor (West Java) HSR TOT
13 – 14.12. Bogor (West Java) Meeting finalization master plan DHS2
19.12. Surabaya (East Java) MNCH Guideline clinics
20.12. Bogor (West Java) Meeting TRT work plan DHS1
20 - 23.12. Tanjung Pinang (Kepu-lauan Riau) Socialization DTPS
2007
03 – 05.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with DHS2, with TA for book writing
5.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with DHS1
08 – 11.01. Palangkaraya (Central Kalimantan) MNCH assessment
09 – 10.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with DHS1 Executive Secretary
11.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting DHS1 review 2007 plan
16 – 21.01. Denpasar (Bali) 1. DHS1 workshop Monev Analysis 2. DHS1 planning activities 2007 3. TA Meeting for book writing
22.01. Jakarta (DKI) DHS2 seminar on HSR & HRD
23.01. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting with ADB
24.01. Jakarta (DKI) TRT meeting with DHS1
26 – 27.01. Surabaya (East Java) MNCH guideline
30.01. Jakarta (DKI) ADB mission meeting
01 – 02.02. Jakarta (DKI) Presenting issue papers & review DHS2 master & annual plan
03.02. Jakarta (DKI) DHS2 kick-off meeting with ADB
07.02. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting DHS2 master & annual plan
08.02. Jakarta (DKI) Wrap up meeting ADB mission
16.02. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting of mind
22 – 23.02. Jakarta (DKI) HSR guideline DHS1
25 – 26.02. Mataram (West Nusa Tenggara) DHS2 integrated planning
07.03. Jakarta (DKI) Preparation consignation meeting reviewing annual and master plan
08 – 10.03. Depok (West Java) Consignation meeting reviewing annual and master plan
27 – 28.03. Bogor (West Java) Compiling work plan TRT DHS1
29.03. Jakarta (DKI) Meet with Michael from EPOS
02 – 04.04. Bandung (West Java) Workshop: mind setting project DHS-2 program coordination
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 76
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
02 – 05.04. Medan (North Su-matera) Workshop: MNCH advocacy with DTPS project DHS-1
06.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: coordination with DHS-2
10.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: with HSP project team
10.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: advocacy module for MNCH DHS-1
11.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: with Bappenas for DHS-1 & 2
13.04. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: with EPOS Team Leader (J. Smith) on HR project
17.04. Bogor (West Java) Meeting: presentation Grand Design at HSP training
17 – 19.04. Cianjur (West Java) Training: advocacy module on MNCH
18 - 21.04. Mamuju (West Su-lawesi) Workshop: finalizing Master Plan Mamuju District project DHS-2
24 – 25.04. Bandung (West Java) Workshop: monitoring & evaluation (monev) analysis & preparation Project Completion Report (PCR) & benefit monitoring evaluation (BME)
01.05. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: coordination DHS-2 with Central Technical Review Team
04.05. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: follow up the workshop analysis monev project DHS-1
08 – 10.05. Batam (Kepulauan Riau) Workshop: exit strategy for DHS-1
09 – 11.05. Bandung (West Java) Meeting: MNCH division of MoH
14 – 16.05. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: review master plan of South Sulawesi
22 – 24.05. Surabaya (East Java) Workshop: budget planning for DHS-1
04 – 07.06. Palu (Central Sulawesi) Workshop: improving data management in MNCH program & MNCH surveil-lance in Donggala District
10 – 11.06. Bengkulu (Bengkulu) Workshop: baseline survey proposal development of DHS-1 on operational research
11.06. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: review annual plan year 2008 and discuss on TOR short course & fellowship abroad for project DHS-2
14 – 16.06. Bandung (West Java) Workshop: generate demand creation on project DHS-1
19 – 20.06. Bengkulu (Bengkulu) Workshop: MNCH surveillance on DTPS DHS-1
21 – 25.06. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: ADB mission on DHS-1 plan of action 2008 & application of 2007 program
26.06. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: ADB kick off with Bappenas
27.06. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: consultation mechanism extension of Central Loan (ADB) to dis-trict/ city government
28.06. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: ADB wrap up with Bappenas
03 – 05.07. Polewali Mandar (West Sulawesi) Socialization & advocacy for DHS-2
06 – 07.07. Gorontalo (Gorontalo) Socialization & advocacy for DHS-2
11.07. Kendari (Southeast Sulawesi) Meeting: Executive Secretary Southeast Sulawesi
13 – 14.07. Cisarua (West Java) Workshop: advocacy material of MNCH Plan project DHS-1
20.07. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: with central TRT on Loan Agreement project DHS-1 & 2
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 77
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
24.07. Makassar (South Su-lawesi) Meeting: Executive Secretary South Sulawesi
25 – 26.07. Manado (North Su-lawesi)
Workshop: on intensification of inter sector collaboration & coordinator for health
06.08. Denpasar (Bali) Meeting: all EPOS team leaders
07 – 09.08. Denpasar (Bali) Workshop: exit strategy of DHS-1
07 – 09.08. Denpasar (Bali) International Seminar: Implementation on Health Decentralization
21 – 24.08. Palembang (South Sumatera) Workshop: socialization for DHS-2
22 – 24.08. Palembang (South Sumatera)
National Seminar: of IAKMI (Indonesian Community Health Expert Associa-tion)
24.08. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: with DHS-1 data on Desa Siaga
27 – 29.08. Denpasar (Bali) Seminar: Indonesia Senior Policy on Health System by World Bank
27 – 29.08. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: economic analysis of Desa Siaga
30.08. Bengkulu (Bengkulu) Workshop: on MNCH advocacy DHS-1
03 – 06.09. Kotabaru (South Kali-mantan) Workshop: on research for free health services and TOR information system
17.09. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: with IRM discussing result of ADB Review Mission
26.09. Jakarta (DKI) Meeting: mid term review ADB mission for DHS-2 Project
10 .10 Jakarta Meeting for the development of GAVI-HSS proposal (at invitatiohn of Bapp-nas)
22.10 Jakarta Meeting DHS 2 prepare for Mid Term Review
24.10 Jakarta Meeting Mid Term Review, & sugestion cancellation
26.10 Jakarta Meeting for the development of GAVI-HSS proposal (at invitatiohn of Bapp-nas)
28.10 Jakarta Meeting with Mission ADB
5 – 10. 11 Puncak, West Java Workshop Mid`Term Review Project DHS 2 with 2 region, East and West
13. 11 Jakarta Meeting pembahasan hasil persiapan tim Design AusAID
14. 11 Jakarta Wrap Up meeting for supervisionary mission for project DHS 2
23. 11 Depok, West Java Workshop on the development of MNCH Maternal
28. 11 – 1.12 Bandung, West Java Workshop “Sharing Experience” Project DHS
5.12 Jakarta Follow up Wrap Up meeting project DHS 2
9 – 10.12 Kndari, South East Sulawesi Resurce person for prject provincial level workshop
12-14 . 12 Denpasar, Bali Meeting to develop guideline for TRT evaluation of various loan initiatives
2008
7-9 .01 Denpasar, Bali Workshop on Nutrition Bappenas-GTZ
22-24.01 Bandung, West Java Meeting, analysis data RisKesDas
25. 01 Jakarta Meeting Report & Advancement discussion Project DHS 2
30 .01 Jakarta Meeting technical for Surveillance activity KIA
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 78
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
01. 02 Jakarta Meeting with director, Secrt. Executive, & TRT of DHS 2
01 – 02.02 Bandung, West Java Meeting anaysis data base & analysis advanced RisKesDas 2007
15 .02 Jakarta Meeting consolidation DHS 2 Pasca Mid Term Review
19 .02 Jakarta Meeting health Sector Cordinating Committe *(HSCC) and stakeholders in framework arranging proposal GAVI-HSS and GAVI-CSD
20. 02 Jakarta Meeting technical for Surveillance activity KIA
27. 02 Jakarta Invitation project SCHS-UE
21-22. 02 Bandung, West Java Meeting follow up mandat & Analysis long RisKesDas
06. 03 Jakarta Meeting health Sector Cordinating Committe *(HSCC) and stakeholders in framework arranging proposal GAVI-HSS and GAVI-CSD
12 – 15. 03 Bandung,West Java Lokakarya analysis monev DHS 2
08. 04 Jakarta Meeting Policy Dialoque
18-19. 04 Bandung, West Java Meeting analysis RisKesDasADB
16. 05 Jakarta Technical meeting project DHS 2
21-24. 05 Mataram, NTB Workshop review project implementation 2008
27. 05 Jakarta Meeting National Steering Committe Project DHS 2
29. 05 Bandung,West Java Meeting, data analysis RisKesDAS
30. 05 Jakarta Preparation proposal technical Project DHS 1 ADB
13. 06 Jakarta Finalization Proposal Technical Implementation study BME Project DHS 1
17. 06 Jakarta Preparation Mission ADB, including DHS 2 Management team
18. 06 Jakarta Kick Off Meeting project DHS 2
23. 06 Jakarta Meeting TRT, KDP, BKKBN (toether with K.Dsaleh)
24. 06 Jakarta Mission ADB
25. 06 Jakarta Workshop Health Sector Reform in the context of decentraklization in Indo-nesia
26. 06 Jakarta Wrap-Up meeting Project DHS 2
02.07 Jjakarta Meeting with DHS 2 staffs
03. 07 Jkarta Meeting with Dir.General of Comunity Health
10 – 12. 07 Bandung, West Java Meeting to reviuew and modification Logframe
14 – 17. 07 Yogyakarta Meeting withBME teams, National and Provinces
18 – 20. 07. Yogyakarta DHS 2 Start Up meeting for West region.
21 – 22. 07 Palembang, South Sumatera
BKKBN meeting for program development
22 – 24. 07 Padang, West Su-matera BME and Individual neeting to review questionaire.
27 - 29. 07 Surabaya DHS 2 Start Up meeting for East Region.
06. 08 Jakarta Meeting with DHS 2 Executive Secretary with staffs.
07. 08 Jakarta Meeting with National BME team., presentation of Questionaire
11 – 12. 08 Gorontalo Attending workshop of PHO with Ministry of Health
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 79
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
When Province Purpose
15 – 18. 08 Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan
Meeti ng for Sinronization program with Districts DHS 2
18. 08 Jakarta TA meeting with ADB Mission (K. Saleh)
19. 08 Jakarta Kick Of f meeting DHS 1 with mission
22 – 24. 08 Mamuju, West Sulawesi Sincronization program meeting with Districts, DHS 2
25. 08 Jakarta BME meeting with mission
26 - 28 Bandung Sharing experience meeting DHS 1
28. 08 Jakarta War up meeting with mission
28 – 30.08 Palembang, South Sumatera Synchronization program meeting with Districts, DHS 2
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 80
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
7.4 District level participation with Assisted Deliveries, 2004
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 81
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
7.5 Desa Siaga Guidelines
7.5.1 Summary
The mid-term review of DHS-2 suggested that one component of the project after the MTR
should be to support the Ministry of Health in expanding it “Desa Siaga” program, but en-
couraging each of the districts to develop five model “Desa Siaga” in their districts based on
the national guidelines, but adapted locally to the situation of the village in which it is imple-
mented.
The Desa Siaga concept aims at developing a system that makes the village responsible for
its own health programme under the guidance of a midwife and two volunteers. It also con-
sist of various village committee’s working on health care financing, response to medical
emergencies, and ways to assist various village members to cope with the challenges of in-
patient hospital care. This system made up of village committee’s should also promote com-
pliance to public health programs such as immunization and posyandu, and make sure that
every pregnant women gets appropriate and adequate medical services. As the system ma-
tures, it can also begin to consider issues of community sanitation, particularly school sanita-
tion.
Facilitators will be trained to work with village members to discuss the health needs of the
village, and health problems over the last few years, they will work with the mothers to de-
velop village action plans based on structured meetings, and various village assessments
that the facilitators undertakes with the health committee and village meetings. These facili-
tators will be trained by the project, and in close cooperation with other village development
programs.
The facilitator will assist the village to develop a village action plan, which will be reviewed by
the provincial TRT, and after acceptance, a block grant will go directly from the ministry of
finance to a bank account managed by the village under “oversight” from the district facilita-
tor. This system will work in parallel to other community development programs such as
PNPM, and interaction with this program at the sub district level will enhance its ability to
mobilize resources for the Desa Siaga program in the future.
Surveillance of infectious disease and program compliance will be a central component of
the Desa Siaga. Community mapping and local action plans by health committee’s are a key
component of this activity. Moreover chains of information flow from the Desa Siaga to
higher levels of the government, and feedback to the Desa Siaga are an important element
of these programs.
NGO’s will be encouraged to work with the Desa Siaga in various locations. National NGO’s,
international NGO’s and local NGO’s will be involved in the Desa Siaga component as it is
rolled out, and implemented.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 82
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Infectious disease monitoring and control, particularly malaria and TB will also be part of this
Desa Siaga initiative, as many of the DHS-2 district contain areas endemic for malaria, and
TB continues to be one of the major causes of death and morbidity among adults. Exclusive
breast feeding for children below six months of age will be promoted, and underweight
mother’s pregnancy will be managed by feedings centres set up and managed by the local
health centres.
A schedule of activities to be undertaken in fiscal year 2008 will be outlined. In order to de-
termine its impact a multi-centre study will be undertaken in the 86 villages where the pro-
gram is implemented, that will measure baseline health care utilization, and public health
program participation, and measure it again, one year after the Desa Siaga program has
been implemented in order to review the impact of the Desa Siaga program. The results of
this will be used in advocacy with local government to further expand and support the Desa
Siaga program.
7.5.2 Model development of Desa Siaga
The objective of this activity is to explore and developed a model of Desa Siaga that is effec-
tive in enhancing health program performance and improving the health status of the village
community, with the following characteristics:
a. Adopting the generic elements of Desa Siaga (Poskesdes, health professionals,
Desa Siaga cadres, implementation of local assessment and community participa-
tion)
b. Effective role of the village community in the planning, implementation and
evaluation of specific health interventions relevant to the community’s needs
c. Mobilization of community resources for implementation of sustainable Desa
Siaga
d. Effective support from the community leaders, religious leaders, head of the vil-
lage, Camat (head of sub-district), Puskesmas and DHO for Desa Siaga,
e. Provision of continuous technical assistance for the Desa Siaga by trained facili-
tator from the Puskesmas and district level
f. Improvement of health program coverage and effectiveness that become the pri-
ority of the respective Desa Siaga
In the end this activity will also formulate a policy recommendation and technical guideline for
Desa Siaga based on the evaluation of the model. In the first year 2 Desa Siaga will be es-
tablished (in two villages) of each district. That will give around 172 Desa Siaga in the entire
86 districts under DHS-2. In the second year additional 3 Desa Siaga will be established in
each district or 258 Desa Siaga in the whole DHS-2 districts. So at the end of the project
time in 2010, 430 Desa Siaga will be evaluated.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 83
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
7.5.3 Elements and principles of the Desa Siaga Activity
1. Desa Siaga is a concept formally introduced by DOH to improve the prepared-
ness at the village level as to overcome various health problems, including dis-
ease outbreaks. According to the MOH Decree No. 574/SK/VIII/2006, the main
elements of Desa Siaga is (a) the establishment of Village Health Post (Poskes-
des), (b) placement of one health professional at least a midwife, (c) empower-
ment of the community through the training of Desa Siaga cadres. Community
participation is executed trough the SMD and MMD mechanism (participative
planning and implementation). Through this mechanism the community will iden-
tify the priority health problems they are having and determine specific actions
they can do to overcome the problems.
2. Theoretically community empowerment is bound to the social the cultural charac-
teristic of any given community. In this case. Indonesia is a country with diverse
cultures. There is a large variation between regions with respect to the level of
socio-economic condition and culture. Sometime there is also variation between
neighboring villages. Therefore, “one size fit all” approach would not effective in
exploring model for community empowerment. In order to make the model ac-
ceptable and sustainable, it should be developed through a participative and bot-
tom up process. The values believed by the community, their social structure,
strength and weakness as well the local opportunity and constraints; all has to be
taken into consideration in developing the model of community empowerment.
3. Four basic principles have to be kept in mind with respect to Desa Siaga:
- First, Desa Siaga is one of the “meeting points” between the health services
and health programs organized by the government with the organized com-
munity efforts. According to the guideline prepared by the Ministry of Health,
Desa Siaga’s main elements are the existence of medical professional (mid-
wives, nurse) who work in integration with the community. The community or-
ganized themselves as to identify their priority health problems and determine
actions that they can and should do to overcome the problems.
- Second, Desa Siaga has a strong notion of “preparedness” or “alertness”.
Alertness basically starts by “knowing”. Therefore in order to make the com-
munity “alert” of any potential health problem, there must be an accurate and
rapid information flow in the community. This is one of the important elements
in developing Desa Siaga model.
- The third principle is “immediate response”. Once there is a potential health
problem recognized, the community through Desa Siaga will take appropriate
actions and if the actions were not sufficient, the formal health service system
will be informed (including Pustu, Puskesmas, DHO and district hospital in the
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 84
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
health system hierarchy). Similarly the government line structure will also be
informed (including village head, sub-district head and district government in
the government hierarchy). In technical term, alertness requires an effective
24 hours surveillance system and the ability to take accurate and immediate
response.
- Fourth, Desa Siaga is a “vehicle” for the community and health service sys-
tem to carry out various health programs and activities. Currently the pre-
dominant perception is to see Desa Siaga as only for maternal and child
health or reducing maternal and infant mortality. It is true that alertness is
necessary in order to take prompt action when there is emergency cases of
maternal and child health, but other health problems also requires the same
alertness such as malaria, tuberculosis, dengue, severe malnutrition, etc.
The “meeting point”, alertness, immediate response and vehicles for various
health activities are generic principles in the concept. To implement the princi-
ples, the Desa Siaga guideline describes the basic elements: (a) establishment of
village health post (Poskesdes), (b) placement of health professional, (c) commu-
nity participation in form of self assessment (Survey Mawas Diri or SMD) and
planning through consensus (Musyawarah Masyarakat Desa or MMD) and (d) ac-
tive role of Desa Siaga cadres.
4. As mentioned above, community empowerment is subject to the variation of local
culture and social-economic condition. Therefore, Desa Siaga model should be
adaptive to the local variation. However, the basic and generic principles have to
be maintained. Based on the above consideration, the models of Desa Siaga in
DHS-2 will be developed and adapted to local specific characteristics with the
main focus on empowering the “alertness and rapid response system” in the
community in collaboration and integration with the health service system owned
both by the government and the private sector.
5. Community participation means that the community makes decisions about the
way the Desa Siaga activity is structured within their community. It generates a
sense of self ownership and insures sustainability.
6. Partnership is another term used indicating mutual collaboration and respect be-
tween all parties; the community, the NGOs and the government. The “one size fit
all” policy that usually predominant in the misconception of participation is avoided
and local variation adapted to the local condition – including the local culture – is
very much tolerated and respected.
7. ”Community empowerment” It is true that empowerment sometimes requires
external support such as provision of information, training, provision of technical
assistant, consultant, seed capital, equipments, etc. The provision of the external
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 85
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
support may lead to creating dependency if the community and local resources
were not mobilized. Therefore it is very essential in the empowerment effort to
transfer the responsibility to the community. The transfer must be well planned in
form of “exit strategy and sustainability plan”. The plan must be developed by the
community themselves.
8. In this activity the community will be given a block grant so that they will have ini-
tial resources to implement whatever plan they have formulated. The block grant
will be channelled through the formal government mechanism of channelling “so-
cial aid fund”. The community with assistance of a trained facilitator will prepare a
budget proposal. The block grant – which mostly covers the operating cost – will
be transferred directly to the community. It is expected that with the block grant all
plan that was made by the community can be implemented.
9. As mentioned above, external support could be vulnerable as far as self reliance
and sustainability is concerned. Therefore, along with the provision of the block
grant, the community should also prepare an exit strategy so that at one point the
financial support is taken over by their own resources. Community financing
scheme is one possibility. Or – in a larger scale, the local government may secure
some funding from APBD to support the community. For example the local gov-
ernment support may be given to well performing Desa Siaga as an award.
7.5.4 Facilitators
Other community based development program, such as KDP, WISLIC-2, and PNPM have
shown that well trained and supervised facilitators are central to the success of community
based programs. DHS-2 will need to recruit, train and mobilize 86 facilitators, and prepare
their training program, and guidance materials for working with the villages. One facilitator
will be trained and based at the district/kecamatan level. The main functions of the facilitator
include the following:
a. Help establish the Desa Siaga following the DOH guideline
b. Assist Desa Siaga in performing SMD, MMD and annual budgeting
c. Review plan and budget proposed by the respective Desa Siaga
d. Assist Desa Siaga in resource mobilization (community financing schemes or
Dana Sehat, and income generating activities)
e. Assist Desa Siaga in maintaining financial recording and reporting system
In order to perform the tasks, the facilitator needs to have the following competency and skill:
a. Basic knowledge on the principles of community development
b. Examples of participative planning and budgeting from other experiences
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 86
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
c. Basic epidemiological surveillance (such as the one prepared by CDC for village
surveillance system)
d. Standard guidelines and indicators for specific health programs (MPS, malaria, tb,
nutrition, immunization, etc)
e. Performance budgeting system
The facilitator will be trained to have the competencies. The training will be done at the pro-
vincial level. The competency based curriculum for the training will be developed.
Based on the required competency, it is assumed that the Desa Siaga facilitator has to have
a bachelor degree in health science / be a graduate of the School of Public Health. The sub-
stance and curriculum for their training will be prepared following the standard training mod-
ule. The facilitators will be based at the district level. In the first year (2009) they will be re-
sponsible of assisting 2 Desa Siaga and 3 Desa Siaga in the subsequent year (2010). The
facilitators will be contracted and paid on a monthly basis plus also funding to support their
operating activity (travel, per-diem, consumables, etc).
7.5.5 Operational model in selected villages
The basic components of the model
The model consists of two main elements: (a) Community empowerment to manage the
Desa Siaga (demand side) and (b) strengthening health services system (supply side).
A. Desa Siaga and community empowerment
1. The organization
The organization of the Desa Siaga consists of the following:
a. Village Health Council: The village health committee will be selected by the com-
munity member whose functions include providing advice to the Desa Siaga Execu-
tive unit (Pengurus) and resolving any dispute in the operation of Desa Siaga
b. Executive management (Pengurus): Executive management consists of selected
individuals who manage the day to day management of the Desa Siaga. This unit
consists of (a) Chairperson, (b) Secretary, (c) Treasurer and (d) Sections
c. Cadres: Desa Siaga cadres are the community members that has been trained and
assigned to do field activity. Their task varies according to the need of specific pro-
gram. For example, the cadres may functions as FP motivator, finding suspected
case of tb and malaria to be referred for laboratory testing, mapping under fives for
weighting and immunization, mapping pregnant women and their antenatal care
status, etc.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 87
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
d. Member (households): The whole village household in the community is the mem-
ber of the Desa Siaga. They are the target of health intervention performed through
the Desa Siaga. They will be involved and have the right to express their voice in the
planning and implementation of Desa Siaga activity. The village member also has to
follow all agreement and consensus that has been achieved under the Desa Siaga,
such as pay their contribution in health financing scheme.
2. Main activity
a. Surveillance and mapping
The secretariat and the cadres will manage a routine surveillance system in form of map-
ping all household in the respective village. Any health condition in each household will be
identified such as the presence of eligible couple for FP, pregnant woman and her ANC
status, delivery, newborn and under-fives, school children and elderly. In other project (such
as the Family Health and Nutrition project), any health condition requires intervention will be
marked under certain color. For example, red color for tb denoting that the household has its
member with suspect tb. The color will be changed to yellow whenever the person has been
treated or given any medical intervention. The color will be changed to green if the person
has successfully cured. All of the household information will be mapped spatially and the
map is displayed in the Poskesdes.
In addition to the routine surveillance, the Desa Siaga also will manage surveillance for
communicable disease outbreak. The cadres work closely with the community member to
detect the incidence of certain disease that has the potential for epidemiological outbreak
such as measles, dengue, diarrhea, bird flue, etc. Any suspected potential outbreak will be
reported immediately to Poskesdes (health professional), head of the village and Puskes-
mas.
In addition to the routine surveillance, the Desa Siaga will also manage surveillance for communicable disease outbreak. The cadres work closely with the community to monitor
the incidence of certain diseases that have the potential for epidemiological outbreaks such
as measles, malaria, dengue, diarrhea, bird flue, etc… Cluster of cases will be reported im-
mediately to Poskesdes (health professional), head of the village and Puskesmas.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 88
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Example of Family Health Card (would be improved after pre-testing)
Household ID:Address:
Indicators Red Yellow Green1 PUS2 Pregnant women
* ANC (K4)* TT* Fe
3 Delivery* Hlth profesionals* Referal for emergency
4 Post natal care5 <5 weigthing6 Immunization
* BCG* DPT* Polio* Measles
7 Tbc case8 Malaria case9 Ibu KEK
10 Dll
b. Participative planning
Participative planning has been introduced and implemented in many community develop-
ment projects. In health sector, this has been done in the PKMD (Pembangunan Kesehatan
Masyarakat Desa) in the 70s, Posyandu in the 80s and 90s, WSLIC project for water and
sanitation, etc. The Posyandu and Desa Siaga guideline introduce the SMD (Survey Mawas
Diri or Village Self Assessment) and MMD (Musyawarah Masyarakat Desa or Village forum
for consensus) mechanisms for participative planning.
In the model, the participative planning will adopt the (1) SMD, (2) MMD mechanism and ad-
ditional step for (3) budgeting. Through the SMD process, the Desa Siaga will organize a
households meeting to determine priority health problems to be address in the coming year.
The summary of the surveillance data and mapping is presented in the SMD forum, to be
used as the basis for identifying priority problems and issues.
In the MMD process, the villagers will determine the targets to be achieved in the coming
year and what actions should be taken to achieve the target. The main objective is to trans-
form as much as possible the “red colour households” to become “green colour households”
The third step in the planning process is for the Desa Siaga to estimate the necessary cost to
perform the actions that will be proposed as the budget. Unless it is very much needed and
has a very strong reason, the emphasis of the budgeting is only for securing operating
budget (not capital investment). The sequential process of budgeting from target to activity
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 89
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
and to cost input to carry out the activity, a performance budgeting will hopefully is assured.
Any cost spent must be linked to specific outputs related to specific target.
A set of user’s friendly tables/matrix will be prepared for the three steps of the participatory
planning and budgeting process. The use of these instruments will be assisted by a trained
facilitator. For example, to help the villagers identifying the necessary action, the facilitator
may help by explaining the standard action for TB (case detection based on symptoms), how
the confirmations is made through laboratory test, what is the treatment procedure for TB
cases including the important of DOTS, and what the DS cadres could to support these pro-
cedures. A simple ABC (Activity Based Costing) method is recommended for estimating the
cost and budget of the community activity. This is also will be assisted by the filed facilitator.
c. Mobilization of community resources
Mobilization of local resources is essential in the model as to assure that the model will be
sustainable beyond the project period. The villagers are urged to explore the possibility of
collecting contribution from households who have the ability to contribute. The collected con-
tribution may cover partially the operating cost in their annual budget, complementary to the
“block grant” be given by the project. Another possibility is to link this community financing
scheme with a certain income generating activity.
d. Implementing specific actions
As mentioned above, the facilitator will help the Desa Siaga (in MMD process) to identify cost
effective intervention for any specific health problems. The basis of selecting the intervention
would be the available standardized guidelines such as the management of malaria program,
tbc, immunization, MPS, IMCI, etc. For an illustration, if the Desa Siaga has determined that
malaria is one of their priorities, the facilitators will explain that malaria control requires the
following activities:
• case detection with laboratory confirmation (blood smear or RDT)
• prompt treatment and assuring compliance of the patient to take the anti-malaria
drugs properly
• distribution of impregnated bed net
• various measures for vector control (elimination of breeding and resting places,
spraying, etc).
In the MMD forum the Desa Siaga and the community then use the information to determine
what action they can do to support the standardized actions in malaria control.
e. Performance monitoring
As the main objective of this model is to accelerate the achievement of selective MDGs tar-
gets, a monitoring system using household mapping will be introduced. Each household with
certain health condition under consideration will be given a “health card” which contains:
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 90
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
• Household ID and address
• Lists of priority health condition/problems
• Coloured boxes following each health condition/problem:
- Red box denotes that the respective household has its member in need of
medical intervention
- Yellow box denotes that the respected person has already under treatment
- Green box denotes that the person has successfully treated
Each household location will be plotted in the village map along with specific problems and
colour of the respective household. Desa Siaga will use the map to monitor progress of its
performance visually, i.e. by evaluating the transfer of red colour to yellow and then to green
colour.
f. Financial management
The Desa Siaga will be given a block grant annually to support their activity. The size of the
grant will be in accordance to their proposed budget that has been reviewed by the Desa
Siaga Advisory Committee, the Facilitator, the head of the village and the Puskesmas.
In order to assure accountability and transparency, the Desa Siaga will use the grant accord-
ingly and managed financial recording and reporting (book keeping) using a prepared stan-
dard financial report forms. The use of the fund should be reported and reviewed monthly by
the Facilitator, Head of the Village and Puskesmas.
In the end of the year all revenue and expenditure will be audited. The result of the auditing
will be made transparent to all village community (in some places the financial balance is
displayed in a board at specific places (in this case as Desa Siaga).
3. Provision of the block grant
The purpose of providing block grant to the Desa Siaga is to cover the start up and operat-ing costs of specific activities related to achieving certain health programme targets.
This is necessary to convince the villagers that their proposed activity will be supported by
adequate financial sources. The provision of the block grant is also to prove if assuring suffi-
cient operating cost will improve health program performance.
The start up (establishment) cost of the DS model include the cost for Poskesdes construc-
tion and its standard equipment, the training of facilitators and the establishment of DS or-
ganization by the community, including the cost of initial participative planning and budget-
ing (SDM and MMD). A certain amount of cost for consumable is also needed, such as drug,
producing household health cards for surveillance and mapping. Earlier calculation estimated
that the start up cost is around Rp 310,000,000, consist of:
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 91
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
• Capital start up cost Rp 260.000.000,-
(Civil work, equipment, training)
• Operating cost: Rp 50.000.000,-
(Drugs, participative planning, other operational cost)
The subsequent operating cost will depend on the annual activity proposed by each Desa
Siaga. The plan is for the project to allocate a block grant to the respective village to cover
the total cost of Rp 310.000.000. This grant will be channeled using Deconcentration budget
allocation mechanism. This is explained as follow:
Planning process:
1. At the village level, a Community Health Committee and Desa Siaga executive
management will be established to manage Desa Siaga, consist of a chairman, sec-
retary, treasurer and 3 members.
2. With the assistance of the facilitator and bidan (especially related to medical aspect
of the planning (planning for drugs, FP, etc), the Desa Siaga management perform a
planning and budgeting process. For the first year the planning include the planning
of the “star up” or initial budget, and the first year operating budget.
(1) Start up budget including
(a) Poskesdes construction,
(b) its necessary equipment and
(c) initial training for the Desa Siaga cadres.
(d) other start up or investment cost
(2) Operating budget
(a) Administrative operating cost (health cards, recording and reporting,
meeting, etc)
(b) Specific activity related to specific performance target (FP, ANC, Li-
nakes, KN, KBayi, CDR tb, CDR malaria, etc
3. Puskesmas will review the plan for technical aspects of health services
4. The head of the village also review the plan for his/her approval, especially related
to the site location for Poskesdes
5. The DHO review the proposal for approval
6. The proposal is submitted by the Desa Siaga management, endorsed by the Village
Health Committee, to the PHO and forward the proposal to MoH
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 92
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Fund channelling:
1. At the village level, the Chair person of the Desa Siaga executing management
open an account in the local bank (Kecamatan)
2. Based on the submitted proposal, the central level (MoH) will authorize KPPN to
transfer the amount to the account of the respective Desa Siaga
3. The amount disburses to the Desa Siaga account is treated as a package of budget
for the respective Desa Siaga.
Assuring financial Accountability
Provision of a “block grant” to the village level requires a mechanism for assuring the ac-
countability of the use of the resources. The mechanism starts from the planning and budget-
ing process in which each budget (funding) link to specific indicator and activity. This follows
the process of preparing “performance planning and budgeting”. The proposed plan will be
reviewed by different level, including the facilitator, Village Chief (who also given the author-
ity to endorse the proposed plan a budget), the Puskesmas, and the DHO staff.
Disbursement of the fund is directly to the account of the respective Desa Siaga under a col-
lective account. It is considered that withdrawing of the funds from the bank should be signed
by three individuals (The DS Manager (Ketua), DS Treasurer, the Facilitator and/or Bidan).
A set of financial reporting system will be developed with clear flow of the fund (cash inflow,
cash outflow, balance, line item budget reporting system, performance budget reporting sys-
tem). The financial report will be exposed in the DS meeting every month. At the end of the
year, an annual audit will be performed by DHO office.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 93
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Role of other institutions
• Village Chief
- Help establish the Desa Siaga
- Help provide the land for the site of the Poskesdes
- Mobilize PKK to support the DS
- Review and endorse the plan and budget proposed by the DS
• Puskesmas
- Help with the establishment of the DS
- Review and endorse DS proposed plan and budget and submit to DHO
- Link DS surveillance system with the Puskesmas system
- Response adequately to any sign of outbreak reported by the DS
- Provide BEONC
- Assist the baseline and evaluation survey
- Cross check that the block grant has been transferred correctly
• District Health Office
- Help determine the location of DS model and the control village
- Advocate the Village Chief to support the DS model
- Propose candidate for facilitator (see the above criteria)
- Supervise and monitor the facilitator
- Cross check that the block grant has been transferred correctly
- Assist the baseline and evaluation survey
- Advocate the result of the evaluation to the Bupati/Walikota
• Local Pemda/Bappeda
- Mobilize PKK to support DS
- Replicate if the model turned out to be cost effective
• Provincial Health Office
- Help the training of facilitators
- Assist the evaluation of the model for the whole province
- Help formulate policy recommendation generated from the evaluation
• Central level
- Review all proposal and budget of DS model
- Assure timely allocation and disbursement of the block grant
- Develop instruments for the baseline and evaluation
- Develop curriculum for the facilitator training
- Evaluate the whole DS model in the 8 provinces
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 94
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
- Help formulate policy recommendation generated from the evaluation
7.5.6 Impact Evaluation of Desa Siaga
An important purpose of this activity is to formulate policy recommendation with regard to
Desa Siaga. Therefore there must be valid evidence demonstrating that the model is really
cost effective. Consequently, the implementation of the model development requires a spe-
cific design that will allow a scientific evaluation.
Testing effectiveness of the model
In each district 2 villages will be chosen as the site for the model development. In addition,
another 2 will be selected for controls. The selection of those villages will be done through
intensive discussion with DHO and district government. Specific criteria will be developed by
technical assistance so that the control villages will match the model villages.
The objective of this activity is to explore and developed a model of Desa Siaga that is effec-
tive in enhancing health program performance and improving the health status of the village
community. It is hope that this activity in collaboration with PNPM and there is a possibility
that this model in some districts might become activities sponsored by other communities.
In the end of this activity as a trial of Desa Siaga under DHS 2 project, it will also formulate a
policy recommendation and technical guideline for Desa Siaga based on the evaluation of
the model. The results of this activity must meet the needs of the national, provincial and dis-
trict governments.
In the first year (2008) there will be 2 Desa Siaga established in the 2 villages of each district
and that will give a total of 172 Desa Siaga in the entire 86 districts under DHS 2. Information
collected in the evaluation of the first year experience will be used to improve the project per-
formance as it is expanded. In the second year (2009) additional 3 Desa Siaga will be estab-
lished in each district or totally 258 Desa Siaga in the whole DHS 2 district.
Design
The model is consists of two main elements (1) community empowerment to manage the
Desa Siaga (demand side) and (2) strengthening health services system (supply side).
The model will be designed based on Quasy Experimental Design. From each district there
will be 2 villages chosen as the site for model development (as experimental object for inter-
vention) and 2 others will be selected for control.
The selection of those villages will be done through intensive discussion with DHO and dis-
trict government. Specific criteria will be developed by technical assistance so that the con-
trol villages will match the model (experimental) village. Each desa siaga village will be
matched with similar village in a neighboring sub district on the following attributes: size, de-
velopment level, education, poverty, occupation, proximity to nearest market.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 95
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Evaluation of the model
Before any intervention was implemented, a base line survey will be done in all dose villages
(both experimental and control village). The base line survey will include variables explaining
the basic characteristic of the community and the villages as well as indicators denoting the
expected outputs of the model development (such as community contribution, regularity of
village organization, coverage or output of certain health program, etc). The information will
be collected quarterly for one year at both case and control villages.
The following indicators will be measured:
• Indicators related to the community empowerment :
- Regularity of village organization,
- Ability of village to manage medical emergency
- Ability of village in self support for financial needed
- Ability of village to sustain the Desa Siaga model
• Indicators related to MDG targets
- MDG 1: reduction of hunger
- MDG 4: reduction of IMR
- MDG 5: reduction of MMR
- MDG 6: reduction of communicable disease
• Indicators related to other health program such as outpatient utilization, school
health programs, water supply and sanitation, etc.
This evaluation should be contracted to a consortium of universities with the multi center sys-
tem and all local public university will be involved under coordination of one center (Gajah
Mada or University of Indonesia).
Indicators
Community empowerment Program performance Outcome indicators
1. Regularity of village organization
• Survey Mawas Diri (SMD),
• Musyawarah Masyarakat Desa (MMD)
• Role of the community in the planning, implemen-tation and evaluation
• Effective support from community leaders, head of the village, Camat
• Implementation of SMD & MMD
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 96
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Community empowerment Program performance Outcome indicators
2. Ability of the village to manage emergency
Preparedness / alertness of the community
• Availability of village ambu-lance
• KAP of alertness • Effective 24 hour surveil-
lance system • List of the blood type of the
whole adult population • Ability of village manage
medical emergency
3. Ability of the village to mobilize resources for implementation
Financial and budgeting sys-tem
• Collecting community con-tribution have developed
• Availability of financial if needed
4. Ability of the village to support the sustain-ability of Desa Siaga
Mobilization of all community resources
• Availability of community saving system
• Availability of exit strategy MDG Target Program performance Outcome indicators
1. MDG 1: Reduc-tion the hunger
Coverage of under five weighing (90%), LBW and SKDN, N/D etc.
Number reported cases of malnutri-tion % children with under weight de-creased
2. MDG 4: reduction of IMR
PNC (2 times), referral of emer-gency cases, immunization cov-erage (85%)
No of life birth, infant death, mea-sles outbreak and number of case of communicable diseases
3. MDG 5: reduction of MMR
CPR, ANC (K4), Assisted deliv-ery, Post Natal Care (PNC 2x) Referral of emergency cases
Number of delivery, emergency cases and referral emergency cases, maternal death
4. 4. MDG 6: re-duction of communicable disease
CDR, SR and CR of Tuberculosis and Malaria
Number of reported Tbc cases Number of reported Malaria cases
Types of program Program performance Outcome indicators
1. Out patient services Utilization of health services • % increase of person seeking
treatment if Sick • % increase of outpatient
2. Sanitation and drinking water supply
Latrine at home and at school, source of drinking water
• % household with latrine • % household with clean wa-
ter supply • % of school have latrine and
hand washing
3. Posyandu attendance Revitalization of Posyandu • Number of active Posyandu • Posyandu attendance in-
crease
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 97
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
4. Sustainability of cadre Number of cadre have train-ing • % of cadre drop out
7.5.7 Cost effectiveness
All inputs given to the model development will be accounted and their cost will be calculated.
This will allow a cost effectiveness analysis to be performed. This evaluation will show the
comparison of cost and effectiveness between the villages with the model (Desa Siaga) and
villages without the model.
With this design, the analysis will compare the marginal cost of any output (see the above
indicators) in the two setting: villages with Desa Siaga model and village without the model.
The evaluation of the model will be based on the assessment of all inputs, process, outputs
and outcome of piloting the model. This is explained in the following table.
Inputs Process Outputs Outcomes1 Poskesdes establishment 1 Surveillance 1 Coverage of speciific
program1 Under nutrition
2 Placement of health professional
SMD and MMD 2 Exit strategy plan 2 Rate of pregnancy
3 Training and placement of facilitator
2 Desa Siaga activity 3 Financial cash flow performance
3 Number of delivery and reported maternal death
4 Block grant to Desa Siaga 3 Desa Siaga management activity
4 Community financial contribution
4 Number reported infant death
5 etc 4 Community financing scheme
5 Number of tb and malaria cases
5 Income generating 6 Frequency of measles outbreak
Non Government Organization’s role
The involvement of non-government organizations will be a feature of the desa siaga DHS
pilot program. This will include international NGO’s (where appropriate), national NGO’s,
and domestic NGO’s. They will be encouraged to partner with the villages, district health
offices, and with the surveillance component. This will start with the national meeting with
various international and national NGO’s, and will role out to the provincial and district level
during 2008.
Surveillance
It is convenient to analyze a surveillance system in terms of its structure, process and output.
Structure consists of objectives, resources and organizational procedures i.e. the input to the
system. The epidemiological surveillance process may be divided into a) observation, com-
munication and confirmation of the event/s and b) interpretation, presentation and communi-
cation of the findings to decision-makers. The final output of the surveillance system often
takes the shape of a communication or report to the decision-makers. The use to which that
report will be put (its impact) is the ultimate test of whether the surveillance system works.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 98
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Surveillance systems provide essential information for designing, implementing, and evaluat-
ing disease prevention and control activities. There will be four main regular activities:
• Data collection,
• Data analysis
• Interpretation, and
• Dissemination of data.
1. Data collection
To improve quality of data collection, it is important to have an understanding of who report, what skills are required to report, and what motivates individual to report. For these rea-
sons, to develop a good surveillance programs, it is needed to provided special training to
health staffs who will responsible to work on surveillance.
2. Data Analysis and Interpretation
Most of the data was only tabulated and aggregated by demographic categories, and then
process end at this level. In some provinces there are trained field epidemiologists (PETPs)
who are responsible for analyzing and interpreting surveillance data, but since the system
was not work, very few surveillance data available at province level.
The objective of this work is to carry out surveillance system in Desa Siaga model of DHS 2
with 172 villages in 86 districts for the first year (2008) and additional 258 villages for the
second year (2009) to become 430 villages at the end of the project.
The result of the surveillance system will be use to develop national surveillance system
based on village and district data information. The surveillance system for desa siaga will be
divided in two main programs: (1) surveillance based on the data from base line survey and
will be present in mapping system, (2) surveillance of communicable diseases that has po-
tential for outbreak.
Surveillance and Mapping
Cadres at Desa Siaga will be given training in:
1. How to conduct a base line survey.
2. Collecting data and develop a mapping system.
3. How to identify certain communicable diseases base on the disease symp-
toms and health problems.
Training for cadres will take place at the Puskesmas in the same subdistrict of the selected
villages, and field study will be at the same selected village. The secretariat and the cadres
will manage a routine surveillance system in form of mapping all household in the village.
Any health condition in each household will be identified and will include in the map:
• the present of eligible couple for FP program (special colours for FP acceptor),
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 99
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
• Pregnant women and her ANC status (different colours for normal, for risk and for
high risk pregnant mother), blood type and estimate time for delivery.
• Number of children (newborn, under five and school children) and elderly.
• Nutrition status of children (different colours for mild and severe nutrition / colour
will be changed every time the condition changes).
• Tuberculosis patients for different colours in each condition.
The mapping exercise will also include location of spring water, households with latrine, and
other indicators.
Communicable Diseases Surveillance
In addition to the routine surveillance, the Desa Siaga will also manage surveillance for
communicable diseases that have the potential for epidemic outbreak.
Disease surveillance conducted by cadre in Desa Siaga is observation of disease through
disease symptoms and situation threatening the raise of health problem to be immediately
reported to the village chief of village and health officer.
The cadres will work closely with the community members to detect the incidence of certain
diseases that have the potential for epidemiological outbreak such as, and will receive basic
training from facilitators to be knowledgeable about the symptoms of:
1. Avian Flu 5. Malaria 9. Poliomyelitis
2. Pneumonia 6. Severe nutrition 10. Infant /neonatal tetanus
3. Diarrhea 7. Measles 11. Vitamin A deficiency
4. Dengue (Dengue Hem-orrhagic Fever)
8. Diphtheria 12. Lung Tuberculosis
Reporting procedures
Any suspected potential outbreak will be reported immediately to Poskesdes (health profes-
sional) and to village government (RT or RW) and to posyandu / UKM if available and do
simple preventive effort and simple handling. In addition, the cadres can also find symptoms
and sign of health problems in the community from posyandu or report directly from commu-
nity. All cases will be reported include : name, address (name of the head of household),
age, gender and occupation (of parent for children case), symptoms and disease signs or
thing threatening health problems (see sample form report by cadres ). All reports have to
be registered in Poskesdes and then immediately send to the nearest Puskesmas and to
Head of the village (see chart below).
Report can be done by using SMS or phone or any kind of electronic communication for a
QUICK action and prevent the disease in spread to others.
Feeding centers established in health centers for “ibu Kek”
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 100
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Mothers will be classified as to nutritional status using mid-upper arm circ. Mothers that are
underweight will be referred to feeding centers developed at local health centers for feeding
and nutrition education. It is proposed that mothers in their second and third trimesters of
pregnancy be given supplemental feeding. This should be procured locally but be in line with
recommendations on nutritional requirements for pregnancy. All efforts will be made to in-
sure that the Desa Siaga becomes responsible for supplying supplemental feeding to under-
weight mothers in the “alert village”. In addition, the desa siaga will undertake the promotion
of exclusive breast feeding for infants under the age of six months.
Control of Infectious Diseases
Many of the DHS-2 districts are still endemic for malaria, and tuberculosis remains one of the
most important causes of mortality for adults in all of Indonesia. Two approaches will be
used in DHS-2 to address the management of these diseases in desa siaga, villages. One
will be training for malaria control for the midwife, health center and district health offices,
and the other will be advocacy with local government on the importance of the control, man-
agement and prevention of these diseases. Additional Desa Siaga village committee’s will
be asked specifically to develop plans on the management of these diseases.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 101
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
7.6 Economic and Financial Analysis of Desa Siaga
7.6.1 Background and Objective of the Analysis
Desa Siaga is a national program to strengthen the capacity and self reliance of the village
community in improving and maintaining their health. The program has a strong national
support, but it is expected that in the process of its development the local government and
local community will take over the responsibility of continuing and maintaining its existence
and operation.
Affordability and sustainability has been an important issue in various health initiatives as
experience in the past in Indonesia. This economic issue is critical especially if the initiative
is aimed at transferring the responsibility to the community, such as the village community.
There were a number of such initiatives that had “come” and “go” such as “Community Fi-
nancing Scheme” (Dana Sehat), Village Community Health Development (PKMD or Pem-
bangungan Kesehatan Masyarakat Desa), Village Drug Post (Pos Obat Desa), Village Inte-
grated Health Post (Posyandu), etc.
Every health initiative has its cost implications, including the start up (investment), operating,
and maintenance costs. The economic analysis shall help answering the following questions:
• How much does it cost to establish Desa Siaga (start up or investment cost)
• How much does it cost to operate the Desa Siaga (operating cost)
• Is the cost affordable within the capacity of local resources (especially operating
and maintenance cost)
• Is it sustainable if Desa Siaga is to be funded by local or village community and
local government?
Answers to these questions are needed for planning and budgeting Desa Siaga, including
finding ways of sustaining it. Moreover, if the costs were related to performance indicators of
Desa Siaga, one can make a judgment on whether the programme was efficient or not.
7.6.2 The Concept of Desa Siaga
Desa Siaga (Alert Village) is a village where the community has the capacity and willingness
to mobilize resources, to prevent and overcome health problems, disaster and emergency
situations in their respective village. The goal of DS is improved health status of the village
community.
The specific objectives of Desa Siaga are:
a) Increase knowledge and awareness of the village community on the importance
of their health
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 102
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
b) Increase the awareness, alertness and preparedness of the village community
about the risks and health hazards that threaten their health, including disasters,
disease outbreaks and emergencies.
c) Increase awareness of the family on their nutritional problems and adopt healthy
life style including personal hygiene.
d) Improve the village environmental health.
e) Improve the ability and willingness of the village community to be self reliant in
improving and maintaining their health.
7.6.3 Pos Kesehatan Desa (Village Health Post) and Desa Siaga
The concept
Poskesdes is the prime mover of Desa Siaga. In order to become a Desa Siaga, a village
has to have an operating Poskesdes. Pos Kesehatan Desa (Poskesdes) is a type of com-
munity based activity aimed at improving access to basic health services to the village com-
munity. Poskesdes is a meeting point between community based activity and government
support activity. It carries out health promotion, prevention and treatment, undertaken by
health personnel (primarily bidan or midwife) in collaboration with cadres and other voluntary
workers.
Tasks and functions
There are at least four main tasks or functions implemented under the Poskesdes:
1. Simple epidemiological surveillance especially communicable diseases that is po-
tential to become epidemic (outbreak) along with risk factors related to the dis-
eases such as nutritional status and vulnerable pregnant women;
2. Overcome the diseases especially communicable diseases that is potential to be-
come epidemic (outbreak) along with risk factors related to the diseases such as
nutritional status and vulnerable pregnant women;
3. Maintain preparedness to overcome disaster and health emergency;
4. Provision of basic health services in accordance to the health workers compe-
tency available in the Poskesdes.
There are also additional tasks of Poskesdes, including the following:
5. Health promotion to improve the awareness of family on nutrition, improve healthy
life style and environmental health.
6. Support and coordinate other community based activities such as village drug
post, community financing scheme, etc.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 103
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Human resources and infrastructures
The personnel of Poskesdes at least should consist of health personnel (at least one mid-
wife), supported by at least 2 cadres. The physical infrastructure of a Poskesdes include (a)
building, (b) furniture, (c) medical equipment, and (d) communication instruments (such as
telephone, cellular phone, etc).
Various ways of establishing Poskesdes building are converting Polindes (Village Maternity
House) to become a Poskesdes, converting any village building (for example village commu-
nity hall), or constructing a new building funded by government, donor, private enterprise or
community self help.
7.6.4 Establishment and Operation of Desa Siaga
The following table describes the process of DS establishment as well as its recurrent activ-
ity. The table also specified the role of various levels including central, provincial, district,
Puskesmas and village (MoH Letter No: 574/MENKES/SK/VIIIThe activity related to Desa
Siaga development can be classified into (1) indirect or support activity and (2) direct activity.
And each of the classifications consists of: (a) investment or start up activity and (b) regular
or recurrent activity. The list of those activity is important as to be used as the basis of iden-
tifying and estimating the cost related to it.
7.6.5 Economic Analysis
There are a number of analytical methods available for an economic analysis of a certain
program such as the Desa Siaga. The analysis include (a) just merely estimating the cost,
(b) relating the cost to certain specific output resulting at an estimate of unit cost of output,
(c) comparing unit cost of several alternative interventions to produce a specified output
(Cost Effectiveness Analysis), (d) comparing the cost of input and benefit of output measured
in monetary term (Cost Benefit Analysis), (e) comparing the cost with the existing resources
(affordability and sustainability), (f) maximizing output given mixed inputs (production possi-
bility frontier), (g) exploring efficiency (economic, technical and scale efficiency), etc.
The feasibility of implementing the analysis is depending on the (a) setting of the intervention
(for example: is a control or baseline data available), (b) clarity and measurability of the out-
put, (c) availability of cost data.
As for the Desa Siaga, there are conditions limiting the execution of all of the above analysis.
At the present time, Desa Siaga is still in its development phase and therefore measuring its
outputs is difficult. There is no alternative intervention to be compared with Desa Siaga as to
see which one was “cost effective”.
One possibility with respect to trying CEA is to compare the performance of the health sys-
tem (for example at the village setting) between the two situations: (a) without Desa Siaga
and (b) with Desa Siaga.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 104
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
In order words, incremental improvement of certain health performance resulting from intro-
ducing Desa Siaga must first be calculated before CEA is executed. However, due to un-
availability of data, CEA was not done in the analysis.
The Cost Analysis
The cost analysis will answer the following questions:
• How much it cost to established Desa Siaga (start up or investment cost)
• How much it cost to operate the Desa Siaga (recurrent or operating cost)
The cost analysis will produce the estimate of the total cost of developing and operating
Desa Siaga. The total cost include all indirect cost provided by various sources as well as
direct cost which usually is incurred at the Desa Siaga (village) level.
The indirect cost include all cost spent for the indirect activity as described in the previous
sections. This cost mostly is spent at the central, provincial, district and Puskesmas levels.
This cost consist of (a) fixed cost or capital investment cost) and (b) variable cost or recur-
rent cost. Similarly, there is direct cost which mostly spent at the Desa Siaga levels. The di-
rect cost also can be classified into (a) fixed cost and (b) variable cost.
INDIRECT (SUPORT) ACTIVITY Level/ Target Accounted1 Start up (Investment) Institution or not
* Guideline development Central Not included* Training modules Central Not included* TOT Central Not included* TOT for district level District DHO staff Included* Training of health personnel - Puskesmas staff to suppport Desa Siaga District Pusk staff Included - Midwife (Desa Siaga) District DS bidan Included* Improving Puskesmas capacity Central Poned (BEON) Not included* Improving Hospital capacity Central Ponek (CEON) Not included* Establishing Puskesmas Team Puskesmas Pusk. Staff Included
2 Recurrent* Monitor and evaluate Desa Siaga Puskesmas Pusk. Staff Included* Reporting progress of Desa Siaga Puskesmas Pusk. Staff Included* Implementing Local Area Monitoring Puskesmas Pusk. Staff Included* Supervision of DS by Puskesmas (regular) Puskesmas Pusk. Staff IncludedDIRECT ACTIVITY
1 Establishment of Desa Siaga (start up)* Establishment of Village Team Village Desa Siaga Included* Village Self Assessment (SMD) Village Desa Siaga Included* Village Consultative Meeting (MMD) Village Desa Siaga Included* Formulation of organization and personnel of DS Village Desa Siaga Included* Cadres training Village Desa Siaga Included* Constructin/establisment of Poskesdes Village Desa Siaga Included
2 Recurrent activity* Poskesdes activity (see below) Village Included(1) Epidemiological surveilance Village Desa Siaga Included(2) Diagnosis and treatment Village Desa Siaga Included(3) Manage risk and outbreak and dissaster) Village Desa Siaga Included(4) Improve nutrition (especially the vulnerable group) Village Desa Siaga Included(5) Identify and manage vulnerable pregrant women Village Desa Siaga Included(6) Basic treatment Village Desa Siaga Included(7) Health promotion Village Desa Siaga Included(8)Cordinate/collaborate with other comm.based activty Village Desa Siaga Included
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 105
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
In order to calculate the Unit Cost (UC) of one Desa Siaga, the indirect cost has to be divided
by the number of Desa Siaga supported using the respective indirect cost. This is compli-
cated knowing the fact that the central government cost (one element of the indirect cost) is
caused by all Desa Siaga across the country. In a lesser degree, the same situation is found
at the level of province, district and Puskesmas. Therefore, a “backward” method is used to
estimate the indirect unit costs. This is done by estimating unit cost of specific input to carry
out indirect as well as direct activities. This is displayed in the table above.
The table indicates five cost components that were purposely not included in the cost calcu-
lation. They represent costs spent at the central level to prepare the guideline, costs for de-
veloping training modules, training of central and provincial trainers, cost of improving Pusk-
esmas’ and district hospital’s capacity to deal with emergency cases (this is primarily the cost
for establishment and construction of BEON and CEON). Based on the list of direct and indi-
rect activity and cost classification related to them, the next steps is to identify all inputs (line
items) needed to carry out the activity. This is shown in the following tables.
START UP (INVESTMENT)
1 IndirectConstruct-
ion (*)Equip-ment
Vehicle Training Others
* TOT for district level Province Included District x* Training Puskesmas staff to support Desa Siaga District Included Pusk staff x
2 Direct (Desa Siaga)* Establishment of Village Team Village Included Desa Siaga x* Village Self Assessment (SMD) Village Included Desa Siaga x* Village Consultative Meeting (MMD) Village Included Desa Siaga x* Formulation of organization and personnel of DS Village Included Desa Siaga x* Midwife (Desa Siaga) training District Included DS bidan x* Cadres training Village Included Desa Siaga x* Constructin/establisment of Poskesdes Village Included Desa Siaga x* Equipment (medical & non medical) Village Included Desa Siaga x
(*) New or converting Polindes to become Desa SiagaRECURENT (OPERATIONAL)
1 Indirect
Salary per month
Drugs/ med-
supplies
Utilities Fuel/consumable
Mainte-nance
Transport Miscelaneous
* Monitor and evaluate Desa Siaga Puskesmas Included Puskesmas x x x* Reporting progress of Desa Siaga Puskesmas Included Puskesmas x x* Implementing Local Area Monitoring Puskesmas Included Puskesmas x x x* Supervision of DS by Puskesmas (regular) Puskesmas Included Puskesmas x x x* Establishing Puskesmas Team Puskesmas Included Puskesmas x* Refresment training Midwife Desa Siaga Included Desa Siaga x* Refreshment training cadres Desa Siaga Included Desa Siaga x
2 Direct (Desa Siaga)
* Poskesdes activity (see below) Village Included
Salary per month
Drugs/ med-
supplies
Utilities/ month
Fuel & consu-mable
Maintenance
Transport Miscelaneous
(1) Epidemiological surveilance Village Included Desa Siaga x x x x x(2) Basic treatment Village Included Desa Siaga x x x x x(3) Manage risk and outbreak and dissaster) Village Included Desa Siaga x x x x(4) Improve nutrition (especially the vulnerable group) Village Included Desa Siaga x x(5) Identify and manage vulnerable pregrant women Village Included Desa Siaga x x x x(6) Health promotion Village Included Desa Siaga x x x x(7) Cordinate/collaborate with other comm.based activity Village Included Desa Siaga x x x x
1. The start up (investment cost)
According to the guideline as discussed above, the start up or investment cost consist of
building construction and equipment (if new Desa Siaga is constructed) or building renova-
tion (if Polindes is coverted), training and DS organisational development.
The Unit Cost of constructing new Desa Siaga is Rp 62,765,000 and if Polindes is converted
to become a Desa Siaga, the Unit cost would be Rp 15,265,000.
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 106
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
START UP COST UC Unit Unit CostConstructiona. New (6 x 5 m x 1,500,000) 45,000,000 1 45,000,000 b. Converting Polindes 5,000,000 1 7,500,000 Equipment 10,000,000 1 10,000,000 Training* DOH Staffs (3 per 100 villages) 500,000 3 15,000 * Pusk staffs (10 per 20 villages) 250,000 10 125,000 * Midwife 7,250,000 1 7,250,000 * Cadre 100,000 3 300,000 Other* Village Team formation 25,000 1 25,000 * Forming DS orgnztn 50,000 1 50,000
New Desa Siaga 62,765,000 Converted 15,265,000
2. The recurrent (operating) cost
The amount of recurrent cost (per year) to operate a Desa Siaga depends on the size of
population of the village where the Desa Siaga is located. The following table displays the
annual recurrent cost per Desa Siaga for 5 different assumption of the total population in the
respective village.
Village size (pop) ========> 500 1500 2500 5000 10000 15000RECURENT/OPERATING COST UC UnitSalary (per midwives/month) 1,000,000 12 month 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 Drugs/med supplies (per population/mo) 560 Population 3,360,000 10,080,000 16,800,000 33,600,000 67,200,000 100,800,000 Utilities (per month) 100,000 12 month 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Fuel & consumables (permonth) 40,000 12 month 480,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 480,000 Maintenance (per yr) 1,000,000 1 yr 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Transport (per month) 100,000 1 yr 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Miscelaneous (permonth) 100,000 12 months 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 Refreshment training 1 Midwife 500,000 1 yr 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 Refreshment training 3 Cadres 50,000 1 yr x 3 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 Replacement trning (midwive) 7,250,000 0.2 per year 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 Village self assessment (SMD) 50,000 1 x per yr 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 Village planning meeting (MMD) 50,000 1 x per yr 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
UC/Desa Siaga 22,640,000 29,360,000 36,080,000 52,880,000 86,480,000 120,080,000 UC/cap 45,280 19,573 14,432 10,576 8,648 8,005
The recurrent cost per year per Desa Siaga ranges from Rp 25.000.000 (village with 500
population) to Rp 120.000.000 (village with over 10.000 population).
Cost Simulation
In order to calculate the total cost of Desa Siaga, a cost simulation is performed in the prov-
inces of DHS-1 project. There are two scenarios for the simulation:
1. New Desa Siaga (with Poskesdes) is established in all villages currently without
health facility (such as Polindes) and all villages with Polindes is converted to be-
come Desa Siaga. In order words, Desa Siaga is introduced in all villages in the
province
2. Desa Siaga is introduced only in the village already having health facility
(Polindes)
The cost implication of the two scenarios is summarized as follow. The figures were derived
from the subsequent tables (assumption: maximum size of the village is 10.000 people).
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 107
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
First scenario (Desa Siaga in all villages)
TotalProvince < 500 500-1500 1500-2500 2500-5000 5000-10000 > 10000NAD 3,159 2,334 266 154 44 - 5,957 Riau 81 487 368 322 138 79 1,475 Bengkulu 241 660 198 90 25 7 1,221 Kepri 15 71 52 53 26 37 254 Bali 2 50 118 301 192 38 701 Sulut 117 633 284 177 55 3 1,269 Sulteng 294 747 239 183 53 11 1,527 Sultra 339 983 224 111 21 6 1,684 Total 4,248 5,965 1,749 1,391 554 181 14,088
Village size
New DS Polindes convrsion Total With facility No facility N village W faclty No facility 60,265,000 5,515,000
NAD 58.1 41.9 5,968 3,469 2,499.00 150,602,235,000 19,131,535,000 169,733,770,000 Riau 77.39 22.61 1,477 1,143 334.00 20,128,510,000 6,303,645,000 26,432,155,000 Bengkulu 68.46 31.54 1,224 838 386.00 23,262,290,000 4,621,570,000 27,883,860,000 Kepri 95.29 4.71 255 243 12.00 723,180,000 1,340,145,000 2,063,325,000 Bali 93.87 6.13 701 658 43.00 2,591,395,000 3,628,870,000 6,220,265,000 Sulut 72.89 27.11 1,269 925 344.00 20,731,160,000 5,101,375,000 25,832,535,000 Sulteng 80.78 19.22 1,530 1,236 294.00 17,717,910,000 6,816,540,000 24,534,450,000 Sultra 50.27 49.73 1,685 847 838.00 50,502,070,000 4,671,205,000 55,173,275,000 Total 66.33 33.67 14,109 9,359 4,750.00 286,258,750,000 51,614,885,000 337,873,635,000
Investment cost
UC (recurrent) 22,640,000 29,360,000 36,080,000 52,880,000 86,480,000 TotalNAD 71,519,760,000 68,526,240,000 9,597,280,000 8,143,520,000 3,805,120,000 161,591,920,000 Riau 1,833,840,000 14,298,320,000 13,277,440,000 17,027,360,000 11,934,240,000 58,371,200,000 Bengkulu 5,456,240,000 19,377,600,000 7,143,840,000 4,759,200,000 2,162,000,000 38,898,880,000 Kepri 339,600,000 2,084,560,000 1,876,160,000 2,802,640,000 2,248,480,000 9,351,440,000 Bali 45,280,000 1,468,000,000 4,257,440,000 15,916,880,000 16,604,160,000 38,291,760,000 Sulut 2,648,880,000 18,584,880,000 10,246,720,000 9,359,760,000 4,756,400,000 45,596,640,000 Sulteng 6,656,160,000 21,931,920,000 8,623,120,000 9,677,040,000 4,583,440,000 51,471,680,000 Sultra 7,674,960,000 28,860,880,000 8,081,920,000 5,869,680,000 1,816,080,000 52,303,520,000 Total 96,174,720,000 175,132,400,000 63,103,920,000 73,556,080,000 47,909,920,000 455,877,040,000
Recurrent cost/year
The cost of introducing Desa Siaga in all villages in the province
Total Recurent TotalNew Desa Siaga Coversion from Polindes (Investment) Cost
NAD 150,602,235,000 19,131,535,000 169,733,770,000 161,591,920,000.00 331,325,690,000 Riau 20,128,510,000 6,303,645,000 26,432,155,000 58,371,200,000.00 84,803,355,000 Bengkulu 23,262,290,000 4,621,570,000 27,883,860,000 38,898,880,000.00 66,782,740,000 Kepri 723,180,000 1,340,145,000 2,063,325,000 9,351,440,000.00 11,414,765,000 Bali 2,591,395,000 3,628,870,000 6,220,265,000 38,291,760,000.00 44,512,025,000 Sulut 20,731,160,000 5,101,375,000 25,832,535,000 45,596,640,000.00 71,429,175,000 Sulteng 17,717,910,000 6,816,540,000 24,534,450,000 51,471,680,000.00 76,006,130,000 Sultra 50,502,070,000 4,671,205,000 55,173,275,000 52,303,520,000.00 107,476,795,000 Total 286,258,750,000 51,614,885,000 337,873,635,000 455,877,040,000.00 793,750,675,000
Start up (Investment Cost)
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 108
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
Second scenario (Desa Siaga only in villages that already have Polindes)
TotalProvince < 500 500-1500 1500-2500 2500-5000 5000-10000 > 10000
NAD 1,840 1,359 155 90 26 - 3,469 Riau 63 377 285 250 107 61 1,143 Bengkulu 165 453 136 62 17 5 838 Kepri 14 68 50 51 25 35 243 Bali 2 47 111 283 180 36 658 Sulut 85 461 207 129 40 2 925 Sulteng 178 453 145 111 32 7 925 Sultra 249 721 164 81 15 4 1,236 Total 2,596 3,940 1,253 1,056 442 150 9,437
Village sizeThe number of Desa Siaga established, converted from Polindes
Investment costProvince N of DS UC (start up) Total Inv. Cost
NAD 3,469 5,515,000 19,131,535,000 Riau 1,143 5,515,000 6,303,645,000 Bengkulu 838 5,515,000 4,621,570,000 Kepri 243 5,515,000 1,340,145,000 Bali 658 5,515,000 3,628,870,000 Sulut 925 5,515,000 5,101,375,000 Sulteng 925 5,515,000 5,101,375,000 Sultra 1,236 5,515,000 6,816,540,000 Total 9,437 5,515,000 52,045,055,000
Recurrent CostProvince < 500 500-1500 1500-2500 2500-5000 5000-10000 Total
UC 22,640,000 29,360,000 36,080,000 52,880,000 86,480,000 NAD 41,648,824,482 39,905,577,734 5,588,881,034 4,742,298,284 2,215,873,977 94,101,455,511 Riau 1,421,070,590 11,079,986,278 10,288,890,793 13,194,761,003 9,248,024,624 45,232,733,288 Bengkulu 3,744,741,294 13,299,286,486 4,902,979,459 3,266,346,929 1,483,829,648 26,697,183,817 Kepri 324,892,913 1,994,283,780 1,794,908,976 2,681,265,827 2,151,104,882 8,946,456,378 Bali 42,502,482 1,377,951,498 3,996,284,622 14,940,523,595 15,585,645,193 35,942,907,389 Sulut 1,930,822,695 13,546,898,345 7,469,043,341 6,822,520,095 3,467,037,037 33,236,321,513 Sulteng 4,032,055,010 13,285,544,204 5,223,566,470 5,861,992,141 2,776,478,062 31,179,635,887 Sultra 5,633,165,416 21,182,926,176 5,931,860,523 4,308,149,929 1,332,942,328 38,389,044,371 Total 58,778,074,882 115,672,454,501 45,196,415,219 55,817,857,803 38,260,935,749 313,725,738,154
The cost of introducing Desa Siaga only in villages that already has Polindes
Province Investment Cost Recurrent Cost Total CostNAD 19,131,535,000 94,101,455,511 113,232,990,511 Riau 6,303,645,000 45,232,733,288 51,536,378,288 Bengkulu 4,621,570,000 26,697,183,817 31,318,753,817 Kepri 1,340,145,000 8,946,456,378 10,286,601,378 Bali 3,628,870,000 35,942,907,389 39,571,777,389 Sulut 5,101,375,000 33,236,321,513 38,337,696,513 Sulteng 5,101,375,000 31,179,635,887 36,281,010,887 Sultra 6,816,540,000 38,389,044,371 45,205,584,371 Total 52,045,055,000 313,725,738,154 365,770,793,154
Affordability
The calculation based on two scenarios as presented above conclude the following:
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 109
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
a) Establishing Desa Saga in all villages in all province of DHS-1 will cost a total
amount of Rp 793,750,000,000. Of this amount, Rp 337,873,000,000 is for in-
vestment (start up) cost and Rp 455,877,000,000 is for recurrent cost.
b) If Desa Siaga is only introduced in villages already having Polindes or other facili-
ties, the total cost would be Rp 365,770,000,000. Of this amount, Rp
52,045,000,000 is for investment cost (start up cost) and Rp 313,725,000,000 is
for recurrent cost.
First scenario
Province Investment Cost Recurrent Cost Total CostNAD 169,733,770,000 161,591,920,000.00 331,325,690,000 Riau 26,432,155,000 58,371,200,000.00 84,803,355,000 Bengkulu 27,883,860,000 38,898,880,000.00 66,782,740,000 Kepri 2,063,325,000 9,351,440,000.00 11,414,765,000 Bali 6,220,265,000 38,291,760,000.00 44,512,025,000 Sulut 25,832,535,000 45,596,640,000.00 71,429,175,000 Sulteng 24,534,450,000 51,471,680,000.00 76,006,130,000 Sultra 55,173,275,000 52,303,520,000.00 107,476,795,000 Total 337,873,635,000 455,877,040,000.00 793,750,675,000
Second scenario
Province Investment Cost Recurrent Cost Total CostNAD 19,131,535,000 94,101,455,511 113,232,990,511 Riau 6,303,645,000 45,232,733,288 51,536,378,288 Bengkulu 4,621,570,000 26,697,183,817 31,318,753,817 Kepri 1,340,145,000 8,946,456,378 10,286,601,378 Bali 3,628,870,000 35,942,907,389 39,571,777,389 Sulut 5,101,375,000 33,236,321,513 38,337,696,513 Sulteng 5,101,375,000 31,179,635,887 36,281,010,887 Sultra 6,816,540,000 38,389,044,371 45,205,584,371 Total 52,045,055,000 313,725,738,154 365,770,793,154
Are these cost affordable? DHS-1 has estimated the amount of budget available for support-
ing Desa Siaga from all sources in 7 out of 8 provinces is Rp 128,541,754,000 (table below).
Province Inv. Cost (TOT midwives only)
Recurrent Cost Total
NAD 2,751,375,000 21,460,090,000 24,211,465,000 Riau 1,354,400,000 17,032,010,000 18,386,410,000 Bengkulu 1,068,700,000 13,368,242,000 14,436,942,000 Bali 1,270,300,000 15,654,546,000 16,924,846,000 North Sulawesi 1,392,600,000 17,196,850,000 18,589,450,000 Central Sulawesi 845,700,000 18,432,673,000 19,278,373,000 South East Sulawesi 2,165,700,000 14,549,568,000 16,715,268,000 Total 10,848,775,000 117,693,979,000 128,542,754,000
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 110
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
This amount is 16% of the total Rp 782,335,910,000 needed in the 7 provinces, i.e. if Desa
Siaga is established in all villages. Or, the available budget would only cover 2,213 villages
in the 7 provinces that have a total of 13,834 villages.
If the available budget is intended to cover villages already having Polindes or other health
facilities, the available budget would cover 35% (3,302 villages) of the total target of 9,437
villages.
Further analysis has been performed to estimate the needed budget the gap is to be closed,
i.e. to cover the remaining villages in the provinces. The following table described the
needed budget, based on two scenarios: (a) all remaining villages will be covered and (b)
only remaining villages with Polindes will be covered.
Needed budget in the coming years
No of village
Investment cost Recurrent cost No of village
Investment cost Recurrent cost
NAD 4,743 285,827,855,250 130,893,831,945.48 2,255 12,435,497,750 62,229,662,958.40 Riau 1,075 64,781,861,750 49,453,180,423.05 743 4,097,369,250 34,179,487,785.76 Bengkulu 928 55,907,840,500 41,380,235,234.71 545 3,004,020,500 24,296,447,269.97 Bali 471 28,366,735,500 28,775,683,823.11 428 2,358,765,500 26,146,930,042.80 Sulut 945 56,965,491,250 34,232,262,269.50 601 3,315,893,750 21,774,290,070.92 Sulteng 1,203 72,513,861,250 41,599,638,389.00 601 3,315,893,750 20,786,854,420.43 Sultra 1,251 75,415,621,000 39,402,751,543.94 803 4,430,751,000 25,296,604,275.53 Total 10,616 639,779,266,500 365,737,583,628.79 5,976 32,958,191,500 214,710,276,823.82 Note: Kepri is not included in this calculation The recurrent cost estimate is adjusted to the village size
ProvinceTarget I (all remaining villages) Target II (remaining villages with Polindes)
The table shows that if all remaining villages would be covered, the needed investment cost
would be Rp 639,779.266,000 and the recurrent cost to run the new Desa Siaga would be
Rp 365,737,583,000.
If only villages already have Polindes would be covered, the needed investment cost is Rp
32,958,191,000 and the recurrent cost to operate the new Desa Siaga would be Rp
214,710,276,000.
The total needed cost per year may less than the amount if the target is broken down into
several years target, fur example 3 years. This is depend on the availability of budget in the
coming years.
7.6.6 Sustainability
The sustainability of the established Desa Siaga will depend on the availability of funds to
cover recurrent costs. There are four potential sources of funding:
1) Budget provided by the (central) government
2) Payment from Askeskin for users of Desa Siaga/Poskesdes for poor people
3) Fees collected by Poskesdes from non-poor users for curative services
4) Local government budget allocation from APBD
Annexes
Support for Health Sector Policy Reforms, ADB TA 3579-INO 111
EPOS Health Consultants
Final Report
December 2008
For villages with mostly poor people, the sustainability of Desa Siaga will depend primarily on
payments from the Askeskin fund.
There are two important issues regarding Desa Siaga’s reliance to its own revenues:
• The first issue is on fee setting (pricing). Fee setting should be based on cost
analysis of services rendered by Desa Siaga and the fee schedule must be ap-
proved formally (for example through local regulation or PERDA).
• The second issue is on revenue retention. Desa Siaga should be allowed to retain
its revenue but has to report the revenue to Puskesmas and/or Dinas Kesehatan.
7.6.7 Cost Effectiveness
Without information on the incremental change of health service performance that can be
attributed to Desa Siaga activities, it is currently not possible to perform a Cost Effectiveness
Analysis (CEA). Desa Siaga carry out various activities and render specific medical care
services including MCH and treatment.
A specific study is needed in order to estimate the effectiveness of Desa Siaga in improving
the coverage of MNCH, such as ANC coverage (K1 – K4), treatment of under nutrition, TT
Immunization, delivery by medical personnel and neonatal visits. The study also should es-
timate the contact rate to basic treatment.
Desa Siaga is designed to render basic treatment services, in addition to MNCH services
and other public interventions such as surveillance, health promotion and environmental
health. Regarding treatment, experiences in Batam show un-expected results. After the lo-
cal government decided to provide free treatment services in all Puskesmas in Batam in
January 2007, the visits to Puskesmas increased four times as by June 2007. The total costs
for drugs quadrupled. The Puskesmas staff said their workload at Puskesmas has increased
and affect their performance outside the Puskesmas (public heath activities).
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
2
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
7.7
DH
S-2
Dis
tric
t Lev
el H
ealth
Sys
tem
Per
form
ance
Dat
a 20
07
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
SOUTH
SUMATR
A
OGAN KOMER
ING ULU
12
8,36
9 13
0,79
2 25
9,16
1 82.34
1.22
0.58
0.31
19.03
1.21
60.00
0.89
84.23
0.36
23.22
50.7
OGAN KOMER
ING ILIR
339,47
0 33
2,56
7 67
2,03
7 66.03
1.51
0.35
9.52
28.21
0.55
53.85
0.83
75.08
0.82
35.44
62.6
MUARA
ENIM
33
3,91
2 30
9,66
1 64
3,57
3 71.40
1.99
0.41
4.87
42.61
0.78
62.29
0.84
85.15
1.26
15.24
64.0
LAHAT
281,95
6 26
8,17
2 55
0,12
8 61.43
1.59
0.58
1.00
21.41
1.17
66.02
1.06
75.15
1.53
27.09
71.0
MUSI RAWAS
251,74
9 23
2,49
6 48
4,24
5 61.89
1.12
0.38
6.51
25.25
0.56
67.34
1.18
83.29
1.00
30.47
56.5
MUSI BANYU
ASIN
245,02
7 23
9,04
9 48
4,07
6 63.61
1.74
0.55
25.27
20.35
1.91
51.75
0.95
68.37
1.49
31.61
43.5
BANYU
ASIN'
377,61
1 37
9,83
9 75
7,45
0 74.12
0.96
0.68
11.63
28.38
0.76
56.34
0.96
84.85
0.58
30.20
52.1
OGAN KOMER
ING ULU
SELATA
N
167,73
9 15
4,72
7 32
2,46
6 58.33
2.00
0.73
18.74
25.82
1.49
54.49
1.07
75.00
1.57
29.01
68.3
OGAN KOMER
ING ULU
TIM
UR
287,41
4 27
7,72
0 56
5,13
4 50.61
1.72
0.49
25.61
12.42
1.66
72.18
1.24
90.48
1.07
35.35
54.4
OGAN ILIR
181,16
3 18
3,98
5 36
5,14
8 59.26
2.06
0.79
6.85
21.35
2.98
50.40
1.68
83.06
1.17
24.84
54.5
PALEMBA
NG
680,97
1 68
8,27
3 1,36
9,24
4 93.72
1.31
1.78
2.29
29.40
1.74
53.89
0.79
71.73
1.99
24.07
25.4
PRABU
MULIH
64,275
68,018
13
2,29
3 87.23
1.28
0.86
8.89
36.14
1.96
65.08
0.66
86.20
1.13
23.37
33.1
PAGAR ALAM
59,299
55,878
11
5,17
7 79.11
1.45
0.80
4.08
16.74
1.31
71.23
0.70
90.24
1.15
22.15
57.0
LUBU
KLINGGAU
90,728
87,310
17
8,03
8 84.85
1.29
0.79
1.16
42.27
1.60
69.98
0.60
68.53
2.43
17.91
28.2
BANGKA
BELITUNG
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
3
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
BANGKA
13
4,14
7 12
2,20
7 25
6,35
4 67.27
1.16
1.77
11.73
27.78
1.64
67.06
0.81
92.08
1.33
23.11
23.8
BELITU
NG
68,932
66,119
13
5,05
1 78.31
1.03
0.99
0.90
28.87
0.98
66.30
1.30
89.91
1.00
27.78
11.3
BANGKA
BARA
T 81,042
72,819
15
3,86
1 68.07
3.15
0.83
2.40
31.31
1.35
60.69
2.45
72.07
1.00
28.24
21.6
BANGKA
TEN
GAH
71,388
66,832
13
8,22
0 70.97
1.01
0.44
2.50
32.17
0.80
62.92
1.83
69.07
0.98
26.54
9.1
BANGKA
SELATA
N
79,167
73,294
15
2,46
1 72.95
1.05
1.18
1.99
34.05
0.91
66.84
1.22
76.60
1.13
35.78
12.9
BELITU
NG TIM
UR
46,300
42,690
88,990
76.08
0.96
0.74
1.25
35.37
1.35
72.84
1.07
91.07
1.00
19.11
7.8
NTB
PANGKA
L PINANG
77,252
73,470
15
0,72
2 91.67
0.95
1.92
0.96
35.76
0.62
50.98
1.09
85.19
1.65
22.86
6.5
LOMBO
K BA
RAT
379,75
5 40
3,26
9 78
3,02
4 63.01
1.68
1.97
2.49
46.89
1.02
60.44
0.72
91.65
1.14
42.16
63.3
LOMBO
K TENGAH
378,66
9 44
7,22
2 82
5,89
1 59.33
1.05
1.57
6.58
39.31
1.61
56.51
0.85
87.61
1.10
27.89
68.5
LOMBO
K TIMUR
480,67
8 57
2,42
2 1,05
3,10
0 67.31
1.85
2.08
3.83
36.88
1.78
55.86
1.01
88.43
1.14
34.08
61.8
SUMBA
WA
209,08
8 19
4,18
4 40
3,27
2 37.98
3.50
1.21
2.29
30.86
1.22
51.52
0.79
77.83
1.08
32.66
50.5
DOMPU
10
4,02
2 10
2,61
9 20
6,64
1 40.51
2.90
2.06
1.88
45.02
1.51
56.19
1.01
69.24
1.50
44.37
71.6
BIMA
205,34
1 20
4,90
0 41
0,24
1 48.76
1.43
1.66
2.56
41.27
0.51
43.38
0.87
80.59
0.63
28.66
75.6
SUMBA
WA BARA
T 48,425
46,891
95,316
54.24
1.86
0.96
2.32
26.65
1.49
43.90
0.94
86.49
1.15
28.63
47.0
MATA
RAM
177,42
5 17
6,82
1 35
4,24
6 79.03
2.21
1.56
4.36
33.44
1.03
64.83
0.90
77.78
0.89
27.42
31.9
BIMA
59,965
65,406
12
5,37
1 60.22
1.81
1.69
3.58
34.61
1.68
53.75
0.99
82.10
1.48
37.25
49.2
NTT
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
4
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
SUMBA
BARA
T 21
7,11
0 19
2,80
6 40
9,91
6 29.31
3.95
1.15
3.71
47.13
0.86
18.67
2.46
61.05
0.78
51.45
85.3
SUMBA
TIM
UR
114,26
2 10
3,22
9 21
7,49
1 34.43
3.73
2.25
2.06
53.68
1.02
23.18
2.70
86.07
1.20
29.47
82.0
KUPA
NG
185,64
0 17
7,66
0 36
3,30
0 35.66
2.19
0.70
8.97
42.38
1.34
38.20
0.74
83.33
1.22
40.96
83.0
TIMOR TENGAH SELATA
N
209,81
1 20
2,48
5 41
2,29
6 23.95
2.62
0.32
10.88
43.24
1.58
39.60
1.10
88.95
1.13
53.53
89.9
TIMOR TENGAH UTA
RA
107,51
7 10
1,46
8 20
8,98
5 58.41
1.64
1.74
4.01
54.21
1.32
45.46
1.46
95.03
1.06
45.38
82.8
BELU
19
7,67
6 19
6,99
2 39
4,66
8 42.55
1.01
1.60
8.22
49.93
0.44
27.37
1.71
91.77
1.10
46.37
74.3
ALO
R 89,063
88,022
17
7,08
5 28.23
3.61
1.01
3.38
34.88
0.92
33.27
0.71
50.77
0.45
46.93
79.7
LEMBA
TA
47,490
54,849
10
2,33
9 59.10
1.03
3.68
1.95
50.05
1.08
24.05
1.48
83.24
1.21
38.00
74.3
FLORE
S TIMUR
107,57
2 11
7,78
4 22
5,35
6 68.24
1.52
0.56
1.38
52.34
0.71
28.03
1.31
98.23
1.00
36.77
88.8
SIKK
A
131,90
6 14
3,96
8 27
5,87
4 75.83
1.37
3.09
4.09
51.31
0.51
39.07
1.00
85.31
1.18
43.40
89.7
ENDE
111,62
1 12
6,49
8 23
8,11
9 46.15
1.75
1.54
7.21
49.89
1.57
20.13
1.76
88.23
1.23
41.60
69.4
NGADA
123,13
6 12
7,18
4 25
0,32
0 68.88
1.54
1.34
2.20
55.99
2.22
25.63
2.50
97.78
0.94
24.69
72.9
MANGGARA
I 25
1,48
6 24
3,66
0 49
5,14
6 49.61
2.01
0.41
13.08
25.85
0.00
48.95
0.89
85.42
1.21
38.56
84.3
ROTE NDA
57,158
53,471
11
0,62
9 33.55
1.58
0.60
0.96
41.59
0.81
28.73
1.71
40.40
1.38
42.96
88.6
MANGGARA
I BARA
T 96,483
99,122
19
5,60
5 26.19
5.83
0.76
3.00
37.34
2.23
38.07
1.43
92.60
1.13
41.84
76.2
KUPA
NG
139,73
7 13
9,33
5 27
9,07
2 72.39
1.57
1.81
2.08
41.56
0.87
36.50
1.28
89.37
1.08
39.79
35.8
CENTR
AL KA
LIMANTA
N
KOTA
WARINGIN BARA
T 10
6,45
4 98,135
20
4,58
9 74.11
1.24
0.67
1.62
28.27
1.05
65.24
1.25
10
0.00
1.00
31.37
20.1
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
5
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
KOTA
WARINGIN TIM
UR
158,22
6 14
8,22
2 30
6,44
8 53.22
1.42
0.64
6.53
28.81
0.90
68.26
0.71
83.69
1.50
24.37
34.4
KAPU
AS
180,90
4 17
3,79
6 35
4,70
0 73.24
1.32
0.50
3.38
24.24
1.48
72.61
0.80
96.39
1.00
40.11
64.2
BARITO
SELATA
N
61,630
56,670
11
8,30
0 62.27
2.64
0.40
1.59
27.17
1.35
71.55
0.71
87.70
0.83
30.99
10.6
BARITO
UTA
RA
59,630
55,720
11
5,35
0 78.12
1.66
0.40
12.11
8.75
5.90
65.84
0.79
50.79
1.10
34.95
44.4
SUKA
MARA
17,927
16,073
34,000
60.72
1.04
0.08
2.63
14.67
4.90
71.11
1.23
85.82
2.00
18.13
20.0
LAMANDAU
50,290
44,600
94,890
75.93
1.13
0.24
0.65
16.23
1.22
65.04
0.57
76.92
0.50
43.79
47.2
SERU
YAN
61,534
54,532
11
6,06
6 53.23
2.99
0.14
14.83
32.64
1.23
62.02
0.60
75.15
1.66
21.49
42.9
KATINGAN
42,428
39,196
81,624
58.36
1.79
0.17
3.96
29.49
0.87
67.61
0.67
82.19
1.15
45.34
11.8
PULANG PISAU
40,229
40,805
81,034
47.40
2.29
0.51
2.32
23.29
0.97
73.40
0.77
93.47
1.09
23.21
45.7
GUNUNG M
AS
85,796
86,898
17
2,69
4 56.93
1.99
0.18
1.38
21.26
3.13
66.62
0.54
76.53
2.85
30.43
18.7
BARITO
TIM
UR
136,63
4 12
4,10
8 26
0,74
2 78.60
1.21
1.03
2.67
16.31
0.74
75.94
0.77
86.89
1.08
25.79
30.8
MURU
NG RAYA
13
8,69
0 13
0,33
4 26
9,02
4 30.56
17.81
0.00
0.00
23.64
1.13
53.05
0.49
47.95
0.31
25.00
31.6
PALANGKA
RAYA
24
1,12
4 22
9,03
6 47
0,16
0 91.71
1.08
0.92
2.00
19.16
0.80
56.40
1.24
85.82
1.02
20.67
33.7
BANJARM
ASIN
134,73
2 13
1,56
6 26
6,29
8 88.26
1.42
1.58
2.00
34.22
1.59
62.38
0.76
73.64
2.09
27.50
51.4
SOUTH
KALIMANTA
N
TANAH LAUT
76,329
74,347
15
0,67
6 71.40
1.97
1.31
6.00
32.02
1.74
67.00
0.95
82.18
1.82
41.55
47.2
BANJAR
101,82
0 10
4,18
0 20
6,00
0 71.60
1.20
1.15
3.77
24.37
1.27
64.46
0.85
69.95
2.25
40.31
41.2
BARITO
KUALA
11
7,36
6 12
2,32
6 23
9,69
2 54.12
1.61
0.35
4.53
24.41
2.91
63.73
0.97
83.36
0.88
34.99
53.4
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
6
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
TAPIN
103,50
9 10
8,22
5 21
1,73
4 73.95
1.80
0.23
3.41
23.80
1.66
70.90
1.07
81.30
1.30
50.79
58.1
HULU
SUNGAI SELATA
N
25,944
22,974
48,918
78.13
1.51
0.51
2.11
41.25
1.57
60.74
0.90
63.55
1.34
57.32
25.7
HULU
SUNGAI TEN
GAH
94,114
95,249
18
9,36
3 69.87
1.24
0.66
2.96
16.88
2.59
71.55
1.38
79.17
1.22
41.30
38.6
HULU
SUNGAI U
TARA
67,932
63,410
13
1,34
2 70.05
1.87
0.39
14.83
25.31
2.76
60.01
0.85
79.18
1.42
36.92
44.0
TABA
LONG
108,95
5 10
7,39
3 21
6,34
8 73.20
1.68
0.72
1.77
26.16
2.43
68.98
0.84
78.61
1.84
33.84
35.5
TANAH BUMBU
39,963
38,002
77,965
61.82
1.63
0.49
1.54
12.60
1.32
67.23
0.95
75.78
1.60
24.82
20.7
BALANGAN
50,985
50,040
10
1,02
5 52.94
1.75
0.15
6.31
16.55
2.21
63.90
1.23
77.08
1.35
29.91
60.6
BANJAR BA
RU
300,57
3 30
2,13
4 60
2,70
7 88.16
1.22
1.69
4.65
28.96
3.03
69.52
0.77
91.26
1.17
31.35
19.0
SOUTH
SULA
WESI
SELAYA
R 55,200
61,215
11
6,41
5 52.67
0.83
0.99
0.87
24.12
1.46
23.48
1.00
63.28
1.90
28.47
66.2
KOTA
BARU
17
5,49
4 20
8,23
6 38
3,73
0 58.67
2.05
0.98
3.48
17.86
6.67
59.81
1.17
61.41
1.54
40.16
64.1
BULU
KUMBA
80,416
90,132
17
0,54
8 46.91
1.78
0.70
3.42
34.87
0.85
37.67
0.49
71.52
1.02
31.47
72.3
BANTA
ENG
160,00
0 16
9,02
8 32
9,02
8 39.87
2.22
0.45
15.12
27.95
2.33
57.77
0.42
71.09
1.62
31.16
77.7
JENEPONTO
12
0,60
4 12
9,87
6 25
0,48
0 35.26
1.82
1.27
9.00
28.62
1.52
61.97
0.99
84.75
0.76
32.05
56.3
TAKA
LAR
294,59
9 29
1,79
9 58
6,39
8 53.03
1.63
1.76
5.59
32.40
1.98
56.80
0.50
60.58
1.46
31.25
51.9
GOWA
108,90
5 11
3,01
0 22
1,91
5 67.52
1.76
0.95
14.37
25.20
3.32
55.92
0.78
63.74
2.34
29.52
76.1
SINJAI
145,34
1 15
2,29
8 29
7,63
9 52.81
1.75
0.35
4.91
40.30
1.99
27.80
1.29
64.07
0.90
43.98
57.2
MARO
S 14
0,18
8 14
9,11
4 28
9,30
2 83.38
1.30
1.09
2.83
28.95
1.32
50.82
0.81
67.90
1.50
29.80
55.8
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
7
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
PANGKA
JENE KEPU
LAUAN
74,590
84,368
15
8,95
8 64.94
1.15
0.37
0.59
22.45
1.39
34.00
0.84
72.80
1.55
46.67
53.5
BARR
U
320,90
0 37
5,79
8 69
6,69
8 37.10
3.19
0.56
0.96
25.92
1.79
45.77
0.93
79.39
1.48
30.86
77.6
BONE
106,77
6 12
0,41
4 22
7,19
0 63.37
1.67
0.43
3.89
22.74
1.59
33.22
1.11
59.82
2.18
35.38
61.6
SOPP
ENG
81,120
81,935
16
3,05
5 59.60
1.93
0.36
4.03
21.37
1.88
45.37
1.14
94.93
1.13
28.10
17.2
WAJO
17
9,09
3 19
4,89
6 37
3,98
9 46.73
2.07
0.20
7.21
16.97
2.28
34.18
0.57
72.10
1.14
24.82
53.3
SIDEN
RENG RAPP
ANG
117,51
2 12
9,36
8 24
6,88
0 71.18
1.41
0.32
0.31
19.46
0.38
51.66
1.01
97.83
1.14
22.33
55.2
PINRA
NG
169,66
4 17
0,52
4 34
0,18
8 75.13
1.63
1.10
10.62
17.97
2.40
39.09
0.87
83.65
0.64
32.02
60.3
ENRE
KANG
94,765
89,096
18
3,86
1 60.49
1.67
0.32
4.12
25.75
1.43
32.64
0.87
89.78
1.05
21.76
81.2
LUWU
160,55
4 15
7,26
0 31
7,81
4 41.52
2.81
0.89
4.58
22.98
1.24
37.13
1.34
77.08
1.36
31.21
57.4
TANA TORA
JA
236,31
3 21
0,46
9 44
6,78
2 53.06
2.02
0.15
10.00
12.00
1.04
29.60
0.53
87.64
1.19
28.89
74.5
LUWU UTA
RA
151,91
5 14
6,94
8 29
8,86
3 49.39
1.73
1.07
2.32
19.73
2.82
52.55
0.99
82.86
1.31
32.92
66.5
LUWU TIM
UR
114,62
1 10
4,87
1 21
9,49
2 64.78
1.83
0.42
6.27
21.41
1.63
54.07
0.60
85.88
1.09
24.50
52.9
UJUNG PANDANG
611,04
4 61
2,48
6 1,22
3,53
0 91.88
1.06
1.74
2.18
32.27
1.52
41.87
1.09
87.67
1.33
41.23
28.2
PARE
‐PARE
54,769
60,307
11
5,07
6 91.27
1.52
2.36
4.43
36.82
1.94
43.98
0.46
86.81
1.11
30.95
32.1
PALO
PO
65,138
69,224
13
4,36
2 65.10
3.14
1.28
19.07
28.75
2.32
38.75
0.84
90.55
0.91
28.50
40.9
GORO
NTA
LO
BOALEMO
60,527
57,555
11
8,08
2 62.17
1.18
0.66
1.42
23.23
0.47
56.45
0.78
75.79
1.39
45.82
75.6
GORO
NTA
LO
213,27
1 21
4,91
5 42
8,18
6 50.18
2.03
0.99
13.15
33.76
1.48
60.87
0.89
80.12
1.35
36.54
70.7
Ann
exes
Supp
ort f
or H
ealth
Sec
tor P
olic
y R
efor
ms,
AD
B T
A 3
579-
INO
11
8
EPO
S H
ealth
C
onsu
ltant
s
Fina
l Rep
ort
Dec
embe
r 200
8
Assisted Delivery
Inpatie
nt Uni‐
tilization in last
year
outpatient use
amon
g ill with
in
last m
onth
Contraceptive
prevalen
ce rate
married
wom
en
age 15
thru 49
years
measles vacina‐
tion am
ong chil‐
dren
12 ‐24 mon
un‐
derw
ght
poverty
(% pop
qu
intile
1&2)
male
female
Total
%
births
at‐
tend
ed
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x %
equity
Inde
x
equity
Inde
x
%
POHUWATO
54,825
54,997
10
9,82
2 60.91
1.94
0.68
10.55
31.00
0.49
63.52
0.83
57.58
0.00
61.40
68.0
BONE BO
LANGO
62,798
64,158
12
6,95
6 53.79
1.66
0.54
3.06
36.78
1.58
62.52
0.92
87.99
1.24
36.44
71.2
GORO
NTA
LO
77,022
81,330
15
8,35
2 81.31
1.43
2.50
1.48
41.93
2.14
54.82
0.63
91.42
1.14
45.69
25.6
WEST SU
LAWESI
POLM
AS
64,928
66,704
13
1,63
2 39.32
1.49
0.14
28.63
15.23
2.77
24.81
1.50
51.69
1.82
38.53
75.8
MAJENE
175,55
2 17
9,84
0 35
5,39
2 65.08
0.78
0.37
15.00
30.92
1.38
25.19
0.48
67.17
0.91
39.24
73.7
MAMUJU
61,248
60,096
12
1,34
4 40.88
1.94
0.37
28.63
15.44
2.77
33.32
1.50
59.64
1.83
32.35
83.8
MAMASA
14
6,15
2 13
7,94
7 28
4,09
9 18.33
6.45
0.54
2.72
19.66
1.06
60.76
0.87
60.00
1.84
31.93
57.9
MAMUJU UTA
RA
50,502
48,222
98,724
37.24
2.30
0.71
5.36
24.39
3.58
42.63
0.49
54.55
1.82
10.68
12.9